WEBVTT

00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:11.759
Uh Well, as you said, I am the collection manager and Senior Math Library

00:00:13.278 --> 00:00:16.925
International. Sorry, this is gonna be
a little bit awkward for me because

00:00:16.958 --> 00:00:22.497
I have, I have a lot of notes in the
computer and all right, um I am the

00:00:22.530 --> 00:00:25.355
collection manager and senior map
librarian at National Geographic. And

00:00:25.388 --> 00:00:31.227
I'm here to tell you about a map.
Heart of the Grand Canyon, a version of

00:00:31.260 --> 00:00:35.135
which is on display on the back wall
there. We National Geographic

00:00:35.168 --> 00:00:41.027
published this map in 1928. But the
idea for it came from Brad Washburn.

00:00:41.060 --> 00:00:43.515
He was

00:00:43.548 --> 00:00:47.885
the project director for it and he
managed the process, the entire process

00:00:47.918 --> 00:00:53.457
from beginning to end and it's
commonly said, um seven years, it's really

00:00:53.490 --> 00:00:56.815
closer to eight when you think about
when he first started buying aerial

00:00:56.848 --> 00:01:00.676
photos for it, but he managed to
process beginning to end. And he's really

00:01:00.709 --> 00:01:05.837
the guy that you should think about
when you think about this map. Um

00:01:05.870 --> 00:01:11.316
Before I start, I wanna give you a, a
quick warning. Um

00:01:11.349 --> 00:01:15.016
When National Geographic First agreed
to help fund Washburn do this

00:01:15.049 --> 00:01:21.727
project, Washburn wrote a letter to
the society's President and said, hey

00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:26.135
, I think you should consider doing an
article in the magazine about this.

00:01:26.168 --> 00:01:31.837
And the president at the time then
forwarded that note on to the, uh the

00:01:31.870 --> 00:01:36.236
magazine editor G grosvenor. And he
said in effect, we both know that

00:01:36.269 --> 00:01:39.986
Washburn has a lot of crazy ideas
about what should go in the magazine.

00:01:40.019 --> 00:01:43.096
But this is actually an idea that
might work. If you agree, please

00:01:43.129 --> 00:01:47.117
consider it. And Groser took the idea
to the Planning Council for the

00:01:47.150 --> 00:01:53.007
magazine who considered it and wrote
back to say, quote, none of us felt

00:01:53.040 --> 00:01:56.717
that an article on the making of a
map, even of the Grand Canyon would

00:01:56.750 --> 00:02:02.316
interest more than a handful of
members. So uh as much as I appreciate

00:02:02.349 --> 00:02:06.055
your comments this morning, we have
about people being rock stars. It, it

00:02:06.088 --> 00:02:11.177
was or was the considered opinion of
National Geographic magazine, one of

00:02:11.210 --> 00:02:15.737
the most beloved and trusted resources
and publications in the world that

00:02:15.770 --> 00:02:19.406
most of you uh in 30 minutes will look
at yourselves and think that you

00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:25.335
had just better had gone to lunch.

00:02:25.368 --> 00:02:28.666
Mhm.

00:02:28.699 --> 00:02:32.335
All right. A little bit about National
Geographic.

00:02:32.368 --> 00:02:35.946
We were originally founded in 1988 as
an organization devoted to the

00:02:35.979 --> 00:02:41.376
increase and diffusion of geographic
information. Our founders, 33 of them

00:02:41.409 --> 00:02:46.275
, a distinguished group of
geographers, military men, scientists and

00:02:46.308 --> 00:02:50.156
explorers, including a couple of army
officers who had played outsized

00:02:50.189 --> 00:02:53.335
roles in the exploration of the canyon
and I should point out here too

00:02:53.368 --> 00:02:58.616
that the earlier version of the slide
also had Grove Carl Gilbert labeled

00:02:58.649 --> 00:03:03.775
as well as um Henry Gannett. So there
was a pretty big contingent of us

00:03:03.808 --> 00:03:11.808
guys, us military map makers who were
godfathers of us cartography

00:03:12.258 --> 00:03:15.616
in pursuit of our mission at National
Geographic. We've awarded more than

00:03:15.649 --> 00:03:20.957
13,000 grants to thousands of people,
oceanographers, archaeologists, poor

00:03:20.990 --> 00:03:24.136
explorers, paleoanthropologists

00:03:24.169 --> 00:03:27.886
and mountain climbers among many
others. People like Robert Pry, Jacques

00:03:27.919 --> 00:03:31.005
Cousteau and Jane Goodall. People who
you might know from National

00:03:31.038 --> 00:03:38.036
Geographic magazine or from perhaps a
TV special starting in the 1960 s.

00:03:38.069 --> 00:03:42.636
We may be best known for pictures, but
cartography is an essential part of

00:03:42.669 --> 00:03:47.495
our history too. We published maps in
the very first issue of National

00:03:47.528 --> 00:03:50.856
Geographic even before pictures made
it in. And we have now created more

00:03:50.889 --> 00:03:56.969
than 7000 unique maps for the
magazine, including 500 pull out supplements.

00:03:59.258 --> 00:04:01.258
Brad Washburn's long relationship with National Geographic began in 1930

00:04:03.300 --> 00:04:06.767
with a lecture he gave about mountain
climbing in the Alps. He was 19

00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:10.126
years old at the time and he'd already
climbed Mount Blanc and the

00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:16.406
Matterhorn as well as the subject of
that night's lecture, a summit called

00:04:16.439 --> 00:04:21.125
the Green Needle in College Washburn
funded his climbing expeditions with

00:04:21.158 --> 00:04:25.366
money he was earning on the lecture
circuit

00:04:25.399 --> 00:04:30.555
in 1934 newly graduated from Harvard.
Harvard led the first expedition to

00:04:30.588 --> 00:04:34.877
successfully climb Southeast Alaska's
Mount Crillon. The next year. The

00:04:34.910 --> 00:04:40.055
geographic center team led by Washburn
to study photograph and map a 5000

00:04:40.088 --> 00:04:44.406
square mile expanse of territory along
the Alaska Yukon border. Washburn

00:04:44.439 --> 00:04:49.697
later conducted the first photographic
flights of Mount mckinley. These

00:04:49.730 --> 00:04:52.866
expeditions were documented by
articles in National Geographic magazine,

00:04:52.899 --> 00:04:57.305
each of which was photographed and
written by Washburn himself. Over the

00:04:57.338 --> 00:05:00.877
years, Wash grew accustomed to working
in extreme conditions. He once

00:05:00.910 --> 00:05:04.106
described the difficulty of standing
atop M mckinley's South summit at

00:05:04.139 --> 00:05:09.265
more than 20,000 ft above sea level

00:05:09.298 --> 00:05:12.717
and in temperatures at 20 below zero
and trying to set up and operate

00:05:12.750 --> 00:05:16.437
survey equipment.

00:05:16.470 --> 00:05:21.296
Quote, it is well nigh impossible to
operate a delicate theodolite with

00:05:21.329 --> 00:05:25.197
gloves on because bare metal cannot be
safely touched with gloved hands.

00:05:25.230 --> 00:05:29.507
In subzero weather, we cover the
tangent screws, leveling screws and other

00:05:29.540 --> 00:05:33.245
adjustable parts with adhesive tape. I
worked with my left hand in a big

00:05:33.278 --> 00:05:37.106
mitten in my right, completely bare.
After three or four minutes, I would

00:05:37.139 --> 00:05:42.387
put my bare hand under my armpit to
warm it up while the recorder checked

00:05:42.420 --> 00:05:47.257
his figures. And then I'd go to work
again.

00:05:47.290 --> 00:05:50.187
Washburn's survey and photo work
culminated in the first map of Mount

00:05:50.220 --> 00:05:54.645
mckinley published in 1960. He later
directed a project funded by the

00:05:54.678 --> 00:05:58.447
geographic to make a large scale map
of the region around Mount Kennedy.

00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:02.736
Canada's Mount Washburn had actually
discovered Mount Kennedy 30 years

00:06:02.769 --> 00:06:06.526
earlier on his Yukon expedition

00:06:06.559 --> 00:06:09.776
and he relied heavily on aerial
photography and newly obtained survey data

00:06:09.809 --> 00:06:13.726
to make the map.

00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:17.455
Not long after Washburn had completed
his map on the mount. His work on

00:06:17.488 --> 00:06:21.346
the Mat Kennedy map, he and his wife
Barbara came to, came to uh the Grand

00:06:21.379 --> 00:06:26.976
Canyon and they were as he put it
disturbed by the fact that they could

00:06:27.009 --> 00:06:31.317
find no large scale maps of the area.
The best available were updated

00:06:31.350 --> 00:06:36.317
editions of the map you just heard
about from Dr Upchurch

00:06:36.350 --> 00:06:41.075
Washburn's response, typical was to
make one himself a large scale map

00:06:41.108 --> 00:06:44.836
depicting the maps depicting the heart
of the Grand Canyon stretching from

00:06:44.869 --> 00:06:48.336
about the south rim to a point 3.5
miles above the above the Colorado

00:06:48.369 --> 00:06:51.245
River

00:06:51.278 --> 00:06:55.796
at a scale of 1 to 4800 far greater
than any previous map. It would cover

00:06:55.829 --> 00:06:59.567
84 square miles and comprise several
sheets that Washburn hoped would

00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:03.967
eventually be published on a smaller
scale as a single sheet to pay for it.

00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:07.236
He would use his research fund from
the Boston Museum of Science where he

00:07:07.269 --> 00:07:10.846
had been the director since 1939 and
he would spread the labor and

00:07:10.879 --> 00:07:15.596
expenses out. Over a number of years,
Washburn was excited to try mapping

00:07:15.629 --> 00:07:20.567
the Grand Canyon. It not only
represents extremely detailed exploration of

00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:23.676
some of the wildest topography on
earth, but it also involves some

00:07:23.709 --> 00:07:27.387
interesting research to determine the
best techniques to depict the canon

00:07:27.420 --> 00:07:31.205
in such a way that the end result will
be totally accurate and precise

00:07:31.238 --> 00:07:35.026
from the scientific, excuse me, from
the standpoint of the scientific user

00:07:35.059 --> 00:07:41.366
, yet beautiful, interesting and
useful for the layman. And the hiker

00:07:41.399 --> 00:07:44.586
Washburn's first step naturally was to
acquire black and white aerial

00:07:44.619 --> 00:07:49.166
photos of the canyon. Beginning in
1970 he arranged to have flights taken

00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:52.796
from 54,000

00:07:52.829 --> 00:07:56.776
and finally from 8500 ft an altitude
low enough to capture important

00:07:56.809 --> 00:08:04.809
details such as roads, buildings, mule
trails, footpaths and vegetation,

00:08:05.119 --> 00:08:08.156
it didn't take long. However, for
Washburn to realize that his, his

00:08:08.189 --> 00:08:11.745
relatively meager research fund from
the Washington Museum of Science was

00:08:11.778 --> 00:08:15.536
not going to support his vision. In
October 1971 he submitted an

00:08:15.569 --> 00:08:20.645
application to the Geographics
Committee on Research and Exploration, the

00:08:20.678 --> 00:08:25.645
cr to ask for financial support. He
wrote,

00:08:25.678 --> 00:08:28.895
although I cannot recollect that the
National Geographic has ever been

00:08:28.928 --> 00:08:32.206
involved in this sort of joint
undertaking before I thought I would

00:08:32.239 --> 00:08:35.496
suggest it to you partly because it is
the sort of thing that you would

00:08:35.529 --> 00:08:39.196
probably like, partly because the
geographic has the resources and the

00:08:39.229 --> 00:08:42.725
inclination to do this thing well and
partly because you have a

00:08:42.758 --> 00:08:45.716
magnificent organization for
distributing a map like this. After it has

00:08:45.749 --> 00:08:48.186
been published,

00:08:48.219 --> 00:08:52.616
Washburn was optimistic that if the
map were properly done, it could be an

00:08:52.649 --> 00:08:55.576
exciting addition to world cartography
and represent one of the world's

00:08:55.609 --> 00:09:00.096
most magnificent cartographic
challenges.

00:09:00.129 --> 00:09:03.657
By this time, Washburn was well known
around the geographic for what he

00:09:03.690 --> 00:09:07.157
could bring to a project. Although it
was hard to see how he might be

00:09:07.190 --> 00:09:11.287
turned down. The CRE nevertheless,
nevertheless requested outside opinions

00:09:11.320 --> 00:09:15.875
on his application to assess the
scientific importance and the viability

00:09:15.908 --> 00:09:19.167
of it.

00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:23.037
Our chief carto, our chief
cartographer at the time, William Peel was

00:09:23.070 --> 00:09:27.907
among those who offered his support.
He wrote it is astonishing but true

00:09:27.940 --> 00:09:30.746
that what is perhaps our most
spectacular natural feature has never been

00:09:30.779 --> 00:09:34.576
mapped in the way it deserves.
Washburn's project appears to be the answer

00:09:34.609 --> 00:09:39.706
to this need. Such a map would not
only carry great public appeal but also

00:09:39.739 --> 00:09:42.816
serve a variety of scientific needs. I
therefore recommend that the

00:09:42.849 --> 00:09:45.566
committee approve the application

00:09:45.599 --> 00:09:49.167
and they did giving him $30,000 in the
first of several grants that would

00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:53.407
be used for this project.

00:09:53.440 --> 00:09:57.456
And here's where I apologize to the
people who have RGB or I'm sorry, red

00:09:57.489 --> 00:10:00.326
green color blindness. I'm sitting on
the plane last night reviewing this

00:10:00.359 --> 00:10:05.706
and I just suddenly the red and the
green jumped out at me and I went

00:10:05.739 --> 00:10:10.385
sorry. There's three maps like this
that have red spots on a green

00:10:10.418 --> 00:10:15.106
background to achieve the kind of
accuracy he sought Washburn first had to

00:10:15.139 --> 00:10:18.557
establish adequate ground control. In
other words, he had to determine the

00:10:18.590 --> 00:10:21.505
precise position and elevation of
every part of the canyon that was going

00:10:21.538 --> 00:10:25.557
to appear on the map without this
framework, the canyon as map would be

00:10:25.590 --> 00:10:29.255
neither precisely fixed to the earth's
surface nor accurately sized and

00:10:29.288 --> 00:10:33.407
shaped. There were existing survey
marks in and around the canyon, but

00:10:33.440 --> 00:10:37.496
Washburn felt that most of them were
inadequate, too old, too far away,

00:10:37.529 --> 00:10:41.446
too hard to get to. There were
however, a few that he thought were

00:10:41.479 --> 00:10:45.157
acceptable, seen here on the map. And
these became the basis for his own

00:10:45.190 --> 00:10:49.086
new control network.

00:10:49.119 --> 00:10:53.856
In early 1971 Washburn, Barbara and a
team of friends and volunteers began

00:10:53.889 --> 00:10:57.976
to establish survey stations and
measure the canyon erecting. A station

00:10:58.009 --> 00:11:01.816
was a small engineering project in and
of itself, Washburn first drilled a

00:11:01.849 --> 00:11:06.717
hole in the rock, then fix a survey
target equipment was set up leveled

00:11:06.750 --> 00:11:10.895
and calibrated. A white cloth was laid
down to make the station visible in

00:11:10.928 --> 00:11:15.547
low altitude photography and a plastic
sphere which in another life had

00:11:15.580 --> 00:11:18.846
been the in of a national geographic
globe would have spray painted bright

00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:23.326
orange in order to make it visible

00:11:23.359 --> 00:11:26.356
from each station. Washburn. And his
team used a theodolite to measure

00:11:26.389 --> 00:11:31.657
horizontal and vertical angles and
lasers to measure distances. The data

00:11:31.690 --> 00:11:34.736
they collected allowed Washburn to
calculate each station's precise

00:11:34.769 --> 00:11:41.356
coordinates as well as its elevation
and distance from other stations.

00:11:41.389 --> 00:11:47.846
Each station was cited repeatedly
perhaps a dozen or more times and excuse

00:11:47.879 --> 00:11:52.297
me, multiple locations in order to
reduce air and ensure accuracy. And I

00:11:52.330 --> 00:11:55.375
don't know how well you can see it if
the resolution is very good. But the

00:11:55.408 --> 00:11:59.616
sheet on the right is a data sheet
that they collected or filled out while

00:11:59.649 --> 00:12:04.866
surveying. I think it's from Hopi
measuring distances from Hopi Hopi point

00:12:04.899 --> 00:12:09.836
to the survey station called middle
and about halfway down the sheet. A

00:12:09.869 --> 00:12:13.186
little more than half way down the
sheet. You see that he has measure the

00:12:13.219 --> 00:12:18.765
distance seven times to a 1000 to
1/1000 of a place and then take the

00:12:18.798 --> 00:12:24.736
average

00:12:24.769 --> 00:12:28.057
washburn. And his team ultimately
surveyed from 92 stations located in the

00:12:28.090 --> 00:12:31.395
heart of the canyon. The stations are
potted on this map and listed in

00:12:31.428 --> 00:12:35.917
tabular form on the right accompanied
by their elevations and coordinates.

00:12:35.950 --> 00:12:39.076
Many of these stations were
impractical or impossible to reach by foot.

00:12:39.109 --> 00:12:44.657
So most of the transportation was done
by helicopter

00:12:44.690 --> 00:12:48.446
washburn. And his team also walked the
canyon's major trails. Bright Angel

00:12:48.479 --> 00:12:52.686
North and South Kaibab Clear Creek,
Hermit Tono in order to pop their

00:12:52.719 --> 00:12:56.547
locations and record their precise
lengths. Even in a low altitude

00:12:56.580 --> 00:12:59.846
photography, long segments of these
trails were invisible because they

00:12:59.879 --> 00:13:05.356
were obscured by shadows and trees
tucked under a rock face which you may

00:13:05.389 --> 00:13:09.956
have noticed on Tom's presentation.
There was a picture of a person what

00:13:09.989 --> 00:13:13.395
hiking down a hill, hiking down the
trail and he was com completely

00:13:13.428 --> 00:13:17.015
underneath a rock face

00:13:17.048 --> 00:13:21.875
or they were just too faint due to
bear train or low use. Washburn, farmed

00:13:21.908 --> 00:13:23.946
out

00:13:23.979 --> 00:13:26.667
some of the field, checking to friends
and volunteers, but he and Barber

00:13:26.700 --> 00:13:31.086
did plenty on their own. In a letter
to Cr Chairman Leonard Carmichael

00:13:31.119 --> 00:13:35.076
Washburn once wrote, working with a
measuring wheel over miles and miles

00:13:35.109 --> 00:13:38.177
of rocket terrain can involve
mistakes, particularly when you're hot and

00:13:38.210 --> 00:13:41.436
tired. So everything of the sort that
we have completed has been done at

00:13:41.469 --> 00:13:48.336
least twice in the Bright Angel Trail
we've now covered 3.5 times.

00:13:48.369 --> 00:13:51.275
It's reasonable at this point to infer
that Washburn was fairly detailed,

00:13:51.308 --> 00:13:55.706
obsessed, but he was neither
unpleasant nor impractical. He once told a

00:13:55.739 --> 00:13:59.486
volunteer who was field checking a
trail with a surveyor's wheel. If you

00:13:59.519 --> 00:14:03.297
make a bad mistake, never back up as
the wheel won't reverse, just stop

00:14:03.330 --> 00:14:06.797
and cuss a bit or a reasonable amount,
then go back to where you made your

00:14:06.830 --> 00:14:14.830
last reliable measurement, start to
wheel zero and just start over.

00:14:15.469 --> 00:14:18.976
Sorry, I meant to point out this is
also a sheet he used while, while, um

00:14:19.009 --> 00:14:22.706
, measuring Bright Angel. And you can
see, I, I hope you can see that what

00:14:22.739 --> 00:14:26.667
he does is he sets the wheel of zero,
starts walking a couple of 100 yards

00:14:26.700 --> 00:14:30.765
, maybe to some kind of a notable
point, a landmark, maybe a curve in the

00:14:30.798 --> 00:14:34.446
trail or the beginning of a tunnel,
taking the measurement and then

00:14:34.479 --> 00:14:37.846
starting it again at zero and starting
over so that every segment is short

00:14:37.879 --> 00:14:41.467
enough to redo if he needs to. And the
whole thing doesn't get spoiled if

00:14:41.500 --> 00:14:45.996
halfway down five miles in, he
realizes he's made a mistake. This is uh

00:14:46.029 --> 00:14:53.787
for Bright Angel. This is page one of
17.

00:14:53.820 --> 00:14:58.967
Here's a summary of Washburn's
fieldwork between 1971 and 1975. He and his

00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:01.826
team made more than

00:15:01.859 --> 00:15:07.417
712 helicopter landings and spent 144
days in the field. It wasn't unusual

00:15:07.450 --> 00:15:10.677
for them to work in the summer when
Washburn reported that they were

00:15:10.710 --> 00:15:13.486
exposed to

00:15:13.519 --> 00:15:18.547
an unrelenting sun and temperatures
that at times crept up to 120.

00:15:18.580 --> 00:15:23.917
He didn't report that I could see
anybody having to jump up and down.

00:15:23.950 --> 00:15:27.157
When Washburn had aerial photos and
survey data collected, he sent them to

00:15:27.190 --> 00:15:31.807
Lockwood mapping in Buffalo, New York.
Lockwood managed the mechanical

00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:35.366
process known as photogrammetry of
turning the aerial photos into a series

00:15:35.399 --> 00:15:39.576
of large scale poster sized
manuscripts depicting contour lines, trails

00:15:39.609 --> 00:15:43.686
and drainage.

00:15:43.719 --> 00:15:50.025
This is part of manuscript sheet
number eight.

00:15:50.058 --> 00:15:55.236
It's not a scan, it's a photo. Thank
you Matt. And it shows I think you

00:15:55.269 --> 00:15:59.037
can get a sense of the detail and the
precision. You can sort of

00:15:59.070 --> 00:16:04.226
understand why photogrammetry, why
Washburn was so enamored of using

00:16:04.259 --> 00:16:12.206
photogrammetry for cartography.

00:16:12.239 --> 00:16:16.145
This map shows the extent of the
original 17 manuscript sheets described

00:16:16.178 --> 00:16:21.037
by Lockwood. The total coverage is 164
miles square miles about twice what

00:16:21.070 --> 00:16:24.917
Washburn had originally envisioned.
You may also notice that the sheets

00:16:24.950 --> 00:16:28.047
are numbered out of sequence

00:16:28.080 --> 00:16:32.525
numbers one through nine represent the
original map as conceived or at

00:16:32.558 --> 00:16:38.895
least as originally funded by c the
other. The next 10 through 17

00:16:38.928 --> 00:16:45.196
represent, represent, represent
additions made to the map subsequent to

00:16:45.229 --> 00:16:48.316
the initial grant and which required a
couple of additional grants from

00:16:48.349 --> 00:16:54.037
the Geographic and Boston Museum.

00:16:54.070 --> 00:16:56.755
It probably won't surprise you to know
that Washburn was not at all

00:16:56.788 --> 00:17:01.686
bashful about asking for things and he
was really quick to go back to the

00:17:01.719 --> 00:17:04.746
geographic and say, you know what we
really, really, really, really need

00:17:04.779 --> 00:17:10.795
to do this, add this add that get
color aerial photos. They almost always

00:17:10.828 --> 00:17:17.107
indulged him in 1974 with the
fieldwork and photogrammetry winding down

00:17:17.140 --> 00:17:21.526
Washburn and the geographic turned
their attention to phase two,

00:17:21.559 --> 00:17:25.266
designing a single sheet map for
publication. By now, the magazine's

00:17:25.299 --> 00:17:28.147
leadership had agreed to publish the
map as a supplement of the magazine.

00:17:28.180 --> 00:17:31.446
And that left Washburn to figure out
what it was going to look like. From

00:17:31.479 --> 00:17:34.436
the beginning. He'd been eager to
employ the same techniques pioneered by

00:17:34.469 --> 00:17:38.647
Swiss cartographers as he'd used on
the mckinley and Mount Kennedy maps.

00:17:38.680 --> 00:17:41.097
If you look closely at the Mount
Kennedy map, you can see a number of

00:17:41.130 --> 00:17:45.035
graphic elements that when used in
combination give the map a realistic

00:17:45.068 --> 00:17:49.726
three dimensional quality that's
consistent with the so called Swiss style.

00:17:49.759 --> 00:17:54.295
These elements are shadows created by
an oblique light source, also known

00:17:54.328 --> 00:18:00.666
initiated relief natural colors which
in this case is uh kind of a blue, a

00:18:00.699 --> 00:18:07.325
very subtle blue gray tint has remarks
for exposed rock and blue hasher

00:18:07.358 --> 00:18:12.196
marks for ice falls and crevasses in
the glaciers and snow fields and

00:18:12.229 --> 00:18:16.535
contour lines rendered in blue to
represent or to suggest the snow and the

00:18:16.568 --> 00:18:21.897
snow and glacier covered alpine
landscape. These elements are extremely

00:18:21.930 --> 00:18:25.996
labor intensive to produce or they
were 40 years ago, but they make for a

00:18:26.029 --> 00:18:32.746
, a very natural looking and and
striking resource. Uh map

00:18:32.779 --> 00:18:36.426
Washburn was from the very beginning,
extremely keen to work with a man

00:18:36.459 --> 00:18:41.347
named Paul Whitwer, a cartographic
relief artist from Swiss Topo had

00:18:41.380 --> 00:18:45.285
worked with Washburn on the mount
mckinley map and Washburn regarded him

00:18:45.318 --> 00:18:48.506
enthusiastically as the number one
acknowledged man in the world at

00:18:48.539 --> 00:18:55.347
painting colored relief starting in
1974 and con continuing well in 1976

00:18:55.380 --> 00:18:59.946
Washburn Witz and his colleagues at
Swiss Topo and the geographic's own

00:18:59.979 --> 00:19:05.467
card, staff debated and tested and
prototyped the most appropriate method

00:19:05.500 --> 00:19:09.545
of representing the canyon, the
colors, the quality of the light and the

00:19:09.578 --> 00:19:13.847
shadows, the spare rugged terrain, the
layer geology, the diverse

00:19:13.880 --> 00:19:20.016
vegetation, the wandering feel in
Washburn's words of the canyon's creeks.

00:19:20.049 --> 00:19:22.825
Washburn was passionate about making a
map that was both scientifically

00:19:22.858 --> 00:19:26.647
precise and conveyed the essence and
character of the canyon. And while he

00:19:26.680 --> 00:19:29.887
was tireless in his efforts to
communicate that vision, he could also be

00:19:29.920 --> 00:19:34.256
rather eloquent as he told New York
Times writer and author John Noble

00:19:34.289 --> 00:19:38.545
Wilford. If you have this kind of
accuracy in all detail, the overall

00:19:38.578 --> 00:19:42.285
feeling of the country will be
correct, great precision and detail, always

00:19:42.318 --> 00:19:48.367
yields extraordinary accuracy in the
sense of the whole.

00:19:48.400 --> 00:19:54.656
These are four of about 20 prototypes
that wiser and Swiss Topo did

00:19:54.689 --> 00:20:01.706
sometime in 1975 and 1976. Most of
them, almost all of them are not well

00:20:01.739 --> 00:20:06.266
documented in the way that Swisstopo
gave them to me in particular, they

00:20:06.299 --> 00:20:11.206
are mostly undated. So, although we
have tons of correspondence in the

00:20:11.239 --> 00:20:15.986
archives and there's really a lot of
it going back and forth between

00:20:16.019 --> 00:20:20.766
Washington and Washburn and
Switzerland and back and forth in circles

00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:24.676
about how should we do this? What's
the palette look going to look like?

00:20:24.709 --> 00:20:29.406
How do we depict the geology without
making it look like a geologic map?

00:20:29.439 --> 00:20:32.107
How are the shadows coming out? What
are we doing about this? What are we

00:20:32.140 --> 00:20:34.847
doing about that? This is the wrong
direction. This is the right direction.

00:20:34.880 --> 00:20:39.597
I'm really discouraged right now. Now,
I'm feeling great.

00:20:39.630 --> 00:20:43.627
I don't have any way really to attach
any of these to any of the

00:20:43.660 --> 00:20:46.867
correspondence. So I don't know what
anybody thought about the thing on

00:20:46.900 --> 00:20:50.097
the left. Uh Other than I can suggest
that the pa palette wasn't the color

00:20:50.130 --> 00:20:53.847
palette wasn't correct. Um But the
rest of them, I mean, the one on the

00:20:53.880 --> 00:21:01.496
right is, is to my eye, almost fully
formed prototype that depicts every

00:21:01.529 --> 00:21:05.526
element of the process and that
apparently was not sufficient. So I don't

00:21:05.559 --> 00:21:09.236
know what the problem was

00:21:09.269 --> 00:21:12.785
in any event for reasons that are not
particularly clear. Washburn

00:21:12.818 --> 00:21:16.555
eventually gave the job of painting
the shaded relief to a guy named T

00:21:16.588 --> 00:21:18.946
Tote

00:21:18.979 --> 00:21:22.055
Thor was a staff photographer had, who
had joined National Geographic in

00:21:22.088 --> 00:21:26.597
1964. He'd been working in Washington
on his own relief samples just as

00:21:26.630 --> 00:21:32.075
Whits had done from Switzerland and
Washburn was apparently happy enough

00:21:32.108 --> 00:21:35.117
with what Por had been working on
that. He just, he gave up on having whit

00:21:35.150 --> 00:21:38.617
do it.

00:21:38.650 --> 00:21:43.897
Sorry, I've just lost my, lost the
mouse, which means I can't get to my

00:21:43.930 --> 00:21:51.930
own notes.

00:21:57.699 --> 00:22:00.035
Yeah.

00:22:00.068 --> 00:22:04.456
Oh, there is, there is,

00:22:04.489 --> 00:22:08.006
Tabor was well suited to the job. He'd
been trained by Swiss Topo and, and

00:22:08.039 --> 00:22:12.266
had actually done the shaded relief
later on the Mount Kennedy map. A

00:22:12.299 --> 00:22:15.676
decade earlier. He also had the
benefit of not being in Switzerland, which

00:22:15.709 --> 00:22:17.887
made communicating with Washburn and
the rest of the geographic

00:22:17.920 --> 00:22:22.065
cartographic staff a lot easier

00:22:22.098 --> 00:22:25.627
using color aerial photos photos that
Washburn had convinced the

00:22:25.660 --> 00:22:30.325
geographic to pay for as his guide.
Tabor started working in earnest in

00:22:30.358 --> 00:22:36.835
1976 11 months. And more than 1000
hours later, he completed the shaded R

00:22:36.868 --> 00:22:41.276
play that now serves as the map maps
Visual Hall. Here's how we describe

00:22:41.309 --> 00:22:45.486
the process. Years later, the heart of
the Grand Canyon was the largest

00:22:45.519 --> 00:22:48.936
and most time consuming relief that I
painted during my 22 years on staff

00:22:48.969 --> 00:22:52.467
at National Geographic, I'd like to
think of this work as my relief thesis

00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:56.016
because it incorporated all that I had
learned about relief shading up to

00:22:56.049 --> 00:22:59.717
that point,

00:22:59.750 --> 00:23:02.976
especially vexing problem for
Washburn. The Swiss and the geographics

00:23:03.009 --> 00:23:06.397
cartographers was how to use contour
lines and color shaded relief to

00:23:06.430 --> 00:23:10.107
depict the canyon's vertical or near
vertical terrain. The problem with

00:23:10.140 --> 00:23:13.436
using contour lines to depict vertical
terrain is that the lines

00:23:13.469 --> 00:23:16.736
necessarily begin to bunch up and
cluster into thick concentrated bands

00:23:16.769 --> 00:23:20.397
that obscure the character of the
landscape rather than elucidate. It. As

00:23:20.430 --> 00:23:24.676
you can see in these USG SS maps,
contour lines leave very little room for

00:23:24.709 --> 00:23:29.575
any other graphic element naming
color. When they start to cluster up into

00:23:29.608 --> 00:23:33.565
these bands. They also do very little
to illustrate the complex topography

00:23:33.598 --> 00:23:37.766
of the terrain other than suggesting
that it's that it's vertical and

00:23:37.799 --> 00:23:44.779
that's, that's only if you know how to
be contour lines in the first place.

00:23:45.328 --> 00:23:47.328
The solution to the problem was to complement the contour lines with cliff

00:23:48.670 --> 00:23:53.295
drawings used to represent the cliffs.

00:23:53.328 --> 00:23:56.016
Here's a four panel sequence that
shows exactly how the cliffs were

00:23:56.049 --> 00:23:58.206
integrated

00:23:58.239 --> 00:24:02.335
panel. One on the left is the contour
lines. The original contour line lay

00:24:02.368 --> 00:24:07.246
with segments removed where the
topography was a vertical or near vertical

00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:09.916
and where the lines would have started
to bunch up and concentrate into

00:24:09.949 --> 00:24:15.335
the thick bands. Panel two shows the
clip drawings which were intended to

00:24:15.368 --> 00:24:19.766
slot into those areas where the
contour lines had been removed. Panel

00:24:19.799 --> 00:24:25.117
three shows the combination of the two
and panel four shows contours cliff

00:24:25.150 --> 00:24:29.367
Ures and T bo shaded relief. And you
can see that the drawings are

00:24:29.400 --> 00:24:34.246
suggestive of the actual rock
formations, especially once they've been

00:24:34.279 --> 00:24:38.656
paired with the shaded relief, they
also permit color to show through and

00:24:38.689 --> 00:24:44.325
this meant to washburn that the map
ultimately could show, could combine

00:24:44.358 --> 00:24:48.276
the mathematical precision of the
contour lines as well as the artistry of

00:24:48.309 --> 00:24:53.006
the shaded relief.

00:24:53.039 --> 00:24:57.617
This is a close up view of the clip
drawings for Isis Temple. They were

00:24:57.650 --> 00:25:03.545
drawn by two Swift Swiss Topo staff
members, Alwa Fleury and, and Rudolf D

00:25:03.578 --> 00:25:09.117
Walder who worked about eight months
in, in summer in 1976 and in early

00:25:09.150 --> 00:25:15.325
1977 according to Washburn, their work
was as expected, painstaking and

00:25:15.358 --> 00:25:20.196
slow. They might spend more than a day
trying to depict with just the

00:25:20.229 --> 00:25:28.055
right brush strokes, too thin, too
thick, too long, too short, too angled

00:25:28.088 --> 00:25:32.347
to depict just a couple centimeters of
cliffs. Washburn was ultimately

00:25:32.380 --> 00:25:38.847
happy. He called their work the
exacting frontier between art and science

00:25:38.880 --> 00:25:43.815
T and the Swiss labored away members
of the geographic cartography staff

00:25:43.848 --> 00:25:47.516
and there were other people were hard
at work on other aspects of the

00:25:47.549 --> 00:25:51.486
map's production. Research,
cartographer Tom Gray worked closely with park

00:25:51.519 --> 00:25:55.555
superintendent Merle Stitt to clarify
place names and compile accurate

00:25:55.588 --> 00:25:58.835
lists in the locations of campgrounds,
archaeological sites, ranger

00:25:58.868 --> 00:26:02.666
stations, picnic areas and other
points of interest that would be that

00:26:02.699 --> 00:26:07.217
would eventually appear on the map.
The page segment here you see is from

00:26:07.250 --> 00:26:12.967
a long list of questions he sent
about, about place names. Gray also

00:26:13.000 --> 00:26:17.127
worked with na Professor Harvey
Butcher, whom Washburn had recognized as

00:26:17.160 --> 00:26:20.176
the number one expert on the details
of the inner reaches of the Grand

00:26:20.209 --> 00:26:26.565
Canyon budget was especially useful in
helping gray identify and pot

00:26:26.598 --> 00:26:30.246
reliable streams and springs which
gray hoped to distinguish on the map

00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:33.887
from those that were intermittent and
seasonal in the interest of public

00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:39.848
safety. Gray eventually removed the
unreliable water sources from the map.

00:26:41.219 --> 00:26:43.219
In May 1978 the heart of the Grand Canyon went to press eight years after

00:26:45.029 --> 00:26:50.137
Washburn had first purchased aerial
photos, two versions were printed both

00:26:50.170 --> 00:26:54.476
at a scale of 1 to 24,000 or about 2.5
inches to the mile. The maps are

00:26:54.509 --> 00:26:58.706
identical except for their coverage.

00:26:58.739 --> 00:27:05.045
The larger of the two maps ok, was,
was printed approximately 34,000 times

00:27:05.078 --> 00:27:08.357
and sold for a while at the Grand
Canyon and at the Boston Museum of

00:27:08.390 --> 00:27:13.545
Science, the smaller the smaller
version of the map, if that's the one

00:27:13.578 --> 00:27:17.476
hanging back, there was printed, was
published and distributed with the

00:27:17.509 --> 00:27:21.656
July 1978 issue of National Geographic
magazine and was therefore printed

00:27:21.689 --> 00:27:25.176
10.5 million times.

00:27:25.209 --> 00:27:33.209
The print run required £1.1 million of
paper and 17 tons of ink.

00:27:33.640 --> 00:27:38.946
Here's the large map, it seems to have
been well received. Washburn

00:27:38.979 --> 00:27:42.217
himself reported shortly after
publication that everything we had received

00:27:42.250 --> 00:27:47.795
ranges from ecstatic to highly
complimentary to be fair. We also received

00:27:47.828 --> 00:27:52.456
some slightly bitter letters from
mostly from staff of the US Geological

00:27:52.489 --> 00:27:54.526
Survey

00:27:54.559 --> 00:27:58.377
who were less impressed. They felt
that it was inaccurate and

00:27:58.410 --> 00:28:04.565
disrespectful to Wash's predecessor's
name, a Geological survey to say as

00:28:04.598 --> 00:28:09.545
the magazine did that the that the
canon had never been mapped in

00:28:09.578 --> 00:28:14.575
sufficient detail for confident field
views by scientists or hikers.

00:28:14.608 --> 00:28:19.936
The magazine stood firm. They said, I
think rightly that Washburn's modern

00:28:19.969 --> 00:28:22.926
methods and the large scale of the
original manuscript sheets from which

00:28:22.959 --> 00:28:28.026
this published map were derived were
unprecedented. Despite the map's

00:28:28.059 --> 00:28:31.815
limited coverage by no stretch of the
whole canyon, it offered detail and

00:28:31.848 --> 00:28:35.206
precision that had never been seen on
any map or as one of the editors

00:28:35.239 --> 00:28:41.627
wrote by all counts, our map is
better, more accurate, more attractive

00:28:41.660 --> 00:28:48.986
and of greater value to the layman
than any US GS map of the canyon.

00:28:49.019 --> 00:28:54.117
I I was watching cartoons at this
point. So

00:28:54.150 --> 00:28:58.295
in any event, the Grand Canyon is a
fitting monument to Washburn's

00:28:58.328 --> 00:29:03.416
dedication, his tenacity, his exacting
standards, not to mention his skill

00:29:03.449 --> 00:29:07.936
as a surveyor, a salesman, a
cheerleader and a project director. It's

00:29:07.969 --> 00:29:13.887
probably top 7000 plus maps. That's
probably geographic, it's probably top

00:29:13.920 --> 00:29:17.406
five in terms of

00:29:17.439 --> 00:29:25.439
and the more i more I look into it,
the more I understand why. Thank you

00:29:27.848 --> 00:29:33.285
if I can. If I have, I have 11 brief
postscript to it. A couple years

00:29:33.318 --> 00:29:38.916
after uh Washburn published, he
published a final report um mostly about

00:29:38.949 --> 00:29:42.887
the survey and less about the
cartography. And he noted that that one of

00:29:42.920 --> 00:29:48.526
the survey stations s 61 from which he
derived most of the spot elevations

00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:53.857
on the map was found to have been
disturbed at some point prior to his use

00:29:53.890 --> 00:29:59.156
of it. So not every but a lot of the
spot elevations that appear on the

00:29:59.189 --> 00:30:03.117
smaller version of the map are off by
2 ft,

00:30:03.150 --> 00:30:07.377
subsequent editions or revisions and
reprints of the larger version of the

00:30:07.410 --> 00:30:12.565
map incorporated the new values. So
despite all his time in the field

00:30:12.598 --> 00:30:18.335
trying to make sure that it was within
inches of correct, it was, we're

00:30:18.368 --> 00:30:24.526
still 2 ft off.

00:30:24.559 --> 00:30:28.085
Ok. Can you guys hear me? Yup. All
right. So we have a few minutes for

00:30:28.118 --> 00:30:33.347
questions. Um Would anybody any
questions out there? Yep. So she's gonna

00:30:33.380 --> 00:30:39.545
be running around. We got one here,
one there.

00:30:39.578 --> 00:30:43.246
Having started my surveying career in
1970 I recognized one of those data

00:30:43.279 --> 00:30:47.647
sheets on measurement and I was just
wondering what kind of a laser

00:30:47.680 --> 00:30:51.137
instrument was used for those
distances I see was measured to a corner

00:30:51.170 --> 00:30:55.776
prism as part of those notes, there
were two, they were both laser ranger

00:30:55.809 --> 00:31:01.156
products, but I couldn't tell you
models or, or I think I remember reading

00:31:01.189 --> 00:31:06.295
that they had one, one was donated by
a pal of Wasp Burns. And then at

00:31:06.328 --> 00:31:11.406
some point later on a second one came
and I don't know if it was

00:31:11.439 --> 00:31:17.746
version 1.1 or what the difference
was. It's well beyond my station in

00:31:17.779 --> 00:31:22.055
life. Um, but I, but laser Ranger was
the product name. Does that, is that

00:31:22.088 --> 00:31:30.088
meaningful?

00:31:37.239 --> 00:31:41.785
Washburn? Sounds to me like someone
who would have wanted to have mapped a

00:31:41.818 --> 00:31:46.397
lot more of this territory. Um What
were the constraints was this his

00:31:46.430 --> 00:31:51.276
vision originally or were there
constraints that from what he says, his

00:31:51.309 --> 00:31:57.206
vision was to get the most heavily
touristed part and expanding beyond

00:31:57.239 --> 00:32:02.756
that was a cost that I didn't think he
either. We shouldn't say he didn't

00:32:02.789 --> 00:32:06.065
care about it, but I think he had
recognized that what he did and what the

00:32:06.098 --> 00:32:10.956
whole canyon represent are much, much,
much different endeavors and there

00:32:10.989 --> 00:32:14.916
was the cost issue. Um,

00:32:14.949 --> 00:32:21.387
I mean, it took long enough for that
little piece. So

00:32:21.420 --> 00:32:24.387
I felt

00:32:24.420 --> 00:32:28.756
ok if it will make you feel any better
math has also had a problem with

00:32:28.789 --> 00:32:35.176
elevations. There was a 6 ft, er, most
of the benchmarks that you'll find

00:32:35.209 --> 00:32:38.785
in the field, they placed the
benchmarks first. When they did their survey

00:32:38.818 --> 00:32:44.226
, you will find that the elevation on
them is 6 ft different from the

00:32:44.259 --> 00:32:52.259
elevation for that benchmark that's
shown on the map

00:32:54.959 --> 00:33:02.959
2 ft 6 ft. Anybody else? Any other
questions

00:33:11.338 --> 00:33:18.335
do? Um Mathis or however you pronounce
his name? Do, do his benchmarks

00:33:18.368 --> 00:33:24.387
appear on Bradbury's map or on
Washburn? They um there are, you can see

00:33:24.420 --> 00:33:29.857
benchmarks notated on the map. Um II I
don't know

00:33:29.890 --> 00:33:35.805
which are whos, but he did mention he
did mention in his, in his report

00:33:35.838 --> 00:33:39.256
that he relied on some of the
measurements or some of the not the

00:33:39.289 --> 00:33:44.176
benchmarks and some of the leveling
done by that crew. Um But, but he did

00:33:44.209 --> 00:33:47.166
, but I'm not sure discounted as the
right word, but he felt most of the

00:33:47.199 --> 00:33:52.877
stuff that was from 19 2, 19 3. It's
too old. He had more modern

00:33:52.910 --> 00:33:59.315
techniques and some of the stuff was,
as you said, is too far away. Did he

00:33:59.348 --> 00:34:04.696
use some of those original points? As
I think so? But I'm not sure if Hopi

00:34:04.729 --> 00:34:11.247
and Middle and the other two that he
said were adequate for his use were

00:34:11.280 --> 00:34:13.836
part of

00:34:13.869 --> 00:34:19.506
II, I don't, I don't know, I I could
probably give a list to Doctor

00:34:19.539 --> 00:34:27.539
Upchurch who might know if, if there's
overlap there.

00:34:29.070 --> 00:34:32.269
Alright. Let's give him a round of
applause.