Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs by molecular beam epitaxy S. R. Johnson, Yu. G. Sadofyev, D. Ding, Y. Cao, S. A. Chaparro, K. Franzreb, and Y.-H. Zhang Citation: Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 22, 1436 (2004); doi: 10.1116/1.1705579 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.1705579 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/3?ver=pdfcov Published by the AVS: Science & Technology of Materials, Interfaces, and Processing Articles you may be interested in Molecular beam epitaxy growth of high electron mobility InAs/AlSb deep quantum well structure J. Appl. Phys. 114, 013704 (2013); 10.1063/1.4811443 Structural, morphological, and defect properties of metamorphic In0.7Ga0.3As/GaAs0.35Sb0.65 p-type tunnel field effect transistor structure grown by molecular beam epitaxy J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 31, 041203 (2013); 10.1116/1.4812793 Sb surfactant effect on GaInAs/GaAs highly strained quantum well lasers emitting at 1200 nm range grown by molecular beam epitaxy J. Appl. Phys. 96, 44 (2004); 10.1063/1.1760841 Sb-mediated growth of Si-doped AlGaAs by molecular-beam epitaxy Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3546 (2004); 10.1063/1.1715153 Si doping for n- and p-type conduction in Al x Ga 1−x As grown on GaAs(311)A by molecular-beam epitaxy J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2638 (2003); 10.1063/1.1539912 Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02 Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs by molecular beam epitaxy S. R. Johnson,a) Yu. G. Sadofyev, D. Ding, Y. Cao, S. A. Chaparro, K. Franzreb, and Y.-H. Zhang Center for Solid State Electronics Research and Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-6206 共Received 27 October 2003; accepted 24 February 2004; published 7 June 2004兲 The Sb-mediated growth of Al0.65Ga0.35As is studied for Sb/III flux ratios from 0% to 2% and growth temperatures from 580 to 720 °C. The surface morphology and electrical properties are found to strongly depend on both the growth temperature and Sb flux. As an isoelectronic dopant, Sb improves the conductivity of n-Al0.65Ga0.35As and reduces the conductivity of p-Al0.65Ga0.35As. As a surfactant, Sb improves the surface morphology of Al0.65Ga0.35As at all growth temperatures with the most dramatic improvement occurring at 670 °C. The smoothest surface 共0.2 nm root-mean-square roughness height兲 was obtained at 700 °C using a Sb/III flux ratio of 0.02. This work demonstrates that Sb-mediated molecular beam epitaxy growth of n-AlGaAs effectively eliminates the ‘‘forbidden temperature gap’’ for device quality n-AlGaAs. © 2004 American Vacuum Society. 关DOI: 10.1116/1.1705579兴 I. INTRODUCTION Today, molecular beam epitaxy 共MBE兲 is widely used to grow optoelectronic devices, such as, in-plane lasers and vertical cavity surface emitting lasers 共VCSELs兲 that cover wavelength ranges from visible to near infrared. These devices typically require a significant amount of Al containing alloys to achieve low index optical confinement layers and high band gap carrier confinement layers. AlGaAs as a nearly lattice-matched alloy, in particular, is widely used on the GaAs substrate, making it the material of choice for GaAs based lasers. Due to the wide range of temperatures required for active materials, such as GaAs, InGaAs, and GaAsSb, it is important that high quality AlGaAs growth is accessible over a wide range of substrate temperatures. Furthermore, good control of surface morphology and deposition rate is important for VCSELs, since accurate layer thickness and smooth interfaces are critical to good device performance. The existence of a forbidden substrate temperature gap for the growth of AlGaAs layers by MBE has been widely reported.1– 4 The surface morphology of Alx Ga1⫺x As (x ⬎0.2) is smooth for lower growth temperatures 共550– 600 °C兲, rough for intermediate temperatures 共620– 680 °C兲, and smooth for high temperatures 共700–750 °C兲. These temperature ranges may vary slightly with the Al composition. The lower growth temperatures result in epitaxial layers with smooth surface morphology that have less than optimal electrical properties compared to layers grown at higher temperatures. At the highest growth temperatures the sticking coefficient of Ga is less than unity and strongly dependent on the growth temperature, resulting in poor layer composition and thickness control. Therefore, compromises are typical when choosing adequate growth temperatures for GaAs/AlGaAs distributed Bragg reflectors in VCSEL devices. Sb as a surfactant has been proposed5 for the growth of a兲 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: shane.johnson@asu.edu 1436 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22„3…, MayÕJun 2004 smoother AlGaAs in the forbidden temperature gap where the Ga sticking coefficient is close to unity and the Sb incorporation rate is close to zero. Since most device applications require a substantial Al mole fraction, we chose to study the Sb-mediated growth of Si and Be doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layers with emphasis on optimizing the electrical properties in addition to the more widely studied surface properties. II. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A set of Si doped (N Si⫽2.0⫻1018 cm⫺3 ) Al0.65Ga0.35As samples were grown at various temperatures 共580, 610, 640, 670, 700, and 720 °C兲 and various Sb/III flux ratios 共0.00, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.02兲. In addition to the extensive set of n-type samples, several Be doped (N Be⫽2.0 ⫻1018 cm⫺3 ) Al0.65Ga0.35As samples were grown at 580 and 640 °C with Sb/III flux ratios of 0.00 and 0.02. The growth was done using a V80H VG solid source MBE system equipped with Ga, Al, Si, and Be effusion cells and As and Sb valved crackers. The As and Sb cracking zones were operated at 1000 °C to ensure that the group-V species were cracked. The samples were grown on semi-insulating GaAs 共001兲 substrates starting with a 30 nm undoped GaAs buffer layer, followed by a 200 nm thick undoped Al0.65Ga0.35As spacer layer and a 1000 nm thick Si 共or Be兲 doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layer. The undoped spacer provides a barrier to free carrier penetration, thus eliminating the possible formation of a two-dimensional electron gas in the GaAs buffer layer that could have an adverse effect on electrical measurements of the samples. Finally, the doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layer was capped with a thin 10 nm Si 共or Be兲 doped GaAs contact layer, whose thickness was chosen to be thick enough to provide electrical contact and yet thin enough not to obscure the surface morphology or conductivity of the underlying AlGaAs layer. The group-V flux values are given in absolute terms, with Sb/III⫽Sb/共Ga⫹Al兲, where, for example, the flux of each element is in units of incident atoms per unit area per unit time. The Al0.65Ga0.35As layers are random alloy and were 1071-1023Õ2004Õ22„3…Õ1436Õ5Õ$19.00 ©2004 American Vacuum Society 1436 Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02 1437 Johnson et al.: Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs FIG. 1. Surface morphology of 1.2 ␮m thick Si doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layers grown at various Sb/III flux ratios and substrate temperatures. 共a兲 Length scale of the surface roughness in the 关110兴 direction. 共b兲 rms height of the surface roughness. grown under a group-V stabilized 2⫻4 surface reconstructed for both Sb-mediated and Sb-free growth. The As2 overpressure was varied depending on the growth temperature, with As/III⫽1.5 at 580, 610, and 640 °C, As/III⫽1.8 at 670 °C, and As/III⫽2.0 at 700 and 720 °C. The absolute V/III flux ratios were established using the onset of the Ga rich surface reconstruction 共or Ga droplet formation兲 to find the one-toone flux ratio 共Sb/Ga⫽1.0 or As/Ga⫽1.0兲, from which each group-V flux curve was normalized in absolute terms. The growth 共substrate兲 temperatures were accurately measured by means of the substrate band edge using diffuse reflection spectroscopy6 and were controlled via a substrate thermocouple which was typically about 100 °C higher than the substrate temperature. The samples were investigated using atomic force microscopy 共AFM兲, x-ray diffraction 共XRD兲, secondary ion mass spectroscopy 共SIMS兲, and Hall effect measurements in the van der Pauw contact geometry. The surface morphology of each sample was examined by AFM. The length scale of the roughness in the 关110兴 direction, L 关 110兴 , and the root mean square 共rms兲 height of the surface roughness obtained from these measurements is reported in Fig. 1 for the various Sb fluxes and growth temperatures. Note that both the sample grown at 580 °C with Sb/III⫽0.005 and the sample grown at 700 °C with Sb/III ⫽0.00 exhibit two length scales, as shown in Fig. 1共a兲. The length scales were ascertained through two-dimensional 共2D兲 fast Fourier transform 共FFT兲 analysis of the AFM images and only observed in the 关110兴 direction. The L 关 110兴 length scales 1437 are a result of surface trenches and ridges orientated perpendicular to, and periodic in, the 关110兴 direction. The smoothing effect of the Sb surfactant in the forbidden temperature gap is evident and the amount of Sb flux required for smoothing tends to increase with the substrate temperature. A Sb/III flux ratio of 0.005 is sufficient for substrate temperatures below 620 °C, whereas a Sb/III flux ratio of 0.01 to 0.02 is necessary in the forbidden temperature gap. The length scale of the roughness in the forbidden temperature gap is insensitive to the Sb/III flux ratio, holding constant at about 200 nm, albeit the rms roughness height is reduced from over 3 to less than 1 nm. On the other hand, the roughness length scale abruptly doubles at 700 °C where higher growth temperatures result in smother surfaces with rms roughness heights below 1 nm. To correlate the quantitative roughness shown in Fig. 1 with the qualitative optical characterization that is commonly used to describe the roughness of epitaxial films, the following observations are offered. The smoothest AlGaAs layers 共⬃0.2 nm rms roughness兲 were grown at 700 and 720 °C with a Sb/III flux ratio of 0.02. Remarkably, these surfaces have the same low levels of roughness as high quality MBE grown GaAs and have a flat mirror like appearance under a high-magnification optical microscope 共with or without phase contrast兲 and exhibit no optical scattering under a bright white-light source. For higher rms roughness levels around 0.5 nm the samples show some texture under an optical microscope and appear hazy under a bright light. For surfaces with poor morphology, the rms roughness exceeds 1 nm and the surface texture is clearly visible under an optical microscope and the samples appear hazy under ambient lighting. These optical scattering observations are valid when the roughness length scales are on the order of the wavelengths of visible light, which is typically the case for MBE grown material and the reason why optical scattering is such a common qualitative technique used by MBE growers. The XRD measurements reveal that about 40% of the incident Sb flux is incorporated at the lowest substrate temperature 共580 °C兲. As the substrate temperature increases the Sb incorporation decreases exponentially, quickly dropping below concentrations measurable by XRD. Therefore to determine the temperature dependence of the Sb sticking coefficient, S Sb 共or incorporation兲, SIMS measurements were done on the samples grown under the highest 共0.02兲 Sb/III flux. The XRD measurements were used to assign absolute numbers to the SIMS data shown in Fig. 2. The Sb sticking coefficient 共left-hand axis兲 and the Sb concentration 共righthand axis兲 decrease by two orders of magnitude over the temperature range shown, resulting in a low 共but nonzero兲 Sb concentration of about 2⫻1018 cm⫺3 in samples grown at 700 °C. Even at the highest growth temperatures Sb is incorporated as an isoelectronic dopant. The Sb sticking coefficient exhibits an Arrhenius behavior 共solid line fit to the data兲 with characteristic energy 2.76⫾0.15 eV. The equation with the best-fit parameters is shown in Fig. 2 where kT is in units of absolute temperature. The constant in front of the JVST B - Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02 1438 Johnson et al.: Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs FIG. 2. Sb sticking coefficient and codoping concentration in MBE grown Al0.65Ga0.35As:Sb as a function of the substrate temperature for a Sb/III flux ratio of 0.02. exponential is 4.0⫻1018 cm⫺3 for the Sb concentration and 1% for the Sb sticking coefficient. Figure 3 shows the room temperature Hall mobility and resistivity of the Si doped (N Si⫽2 ⫻1018 cm⫺3 ) Al0.65Ga0.35As layers discussed above and shown in Fig. 1. The electron mobility increases with the growth temperature and is enhanced by Sb codoping. Remarkably, at the lower growth temperatures where the Sb codoping levels are large (⬃1020 cm⫺3 ), Sb as an isoelec- FIG. 3. Electrical properties of 1.0 ␮m thick Si doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layers grown at various Sb/III flux ratios and substrate temperatures. 共a兲 Electron mobility, with the electron concentration and doping efficiency shown in the inset. 共b兲 Sheet resistance and resistivity; the solid lines are fits to the data for samples grown without Sb 共upper curve兲 and with Sb 共lower curve兲. 1438 tronic dopant still improves the electron mobility, indicating that Sb codoping does not add to electron scattering. In the 640 to 670 °C growth temperature range, the optimal Sb codoping level is about 3⫻1018 cm⫺3 共Sb/III⫽0.005–0.01兲. For the highest growth temperature 共720 °C兲, the mobility decreases because the Al mole fraction erroneously increases from 0.65 to 0.70 when the Ga sticking coefficient decreases from close to unity at 700 °C to 0.8 at 720 °C. The Al mole fraction 共and hence Ga sticking兲 is determined from strain measurements of the AlGaAs layer using XRD. At high growth temperatures the contribution of incorporated Sb to strain is roughly equivalent to ⫹1% in Al mole fraction and is disregarded in the Ga sticking coefficient analysis. Despite the fact that growth temperature and Sb codoping have a dramatic effect on the electron mobility, the overall contribution to the conductivity is not as spectacular because of a strong dependence of the electron concentration 共doping efficiency兲 on the growth temperature, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3共a兲. The electron concentration is given on the lefthand axis and the Si doping efficiency is given on the righthand axis. Here the Si doping efficiency is defined as n AlGaAs /n GaAs 共Hall measurements兲 for a given Si doping flux; note that we are assuming that n GaAs⬃N Si , neglecting the fact that a small fraction of Si incorporates as an acceptor in GaAs. Although not as absolutely accurate as Hall measurements, SIMS measurements tend to validate our assumption, where we found that N SIMS⬃7⫻1017 cm⫺3 for Sidoped GaAs with n GaAs⫽1⫻1018 cm⫺3 . The accuracy of the SIMS data is limited by the ⫾40% absolute accuracy of the Si implant samples used as SIMS reference standards. The trend in doping efficiency, shown by the solid line, Fig. 3共a兲 inset, is independent of the Sb codoping levels and has a minimum of 10% at 660 °C, right in the heart of the forbidden temperature gap. The best doping efficiency 共25%兲 occurs at the lowest growth temperature 共580 °C兲. Notwithstanding the decline in electron concentration, the conductivity of the AlGaAs layer increases with the growth temperature, as shown by the plot in Fig. 3共b兲 with resistivity on the right-hand axis and sheet resistance on the left-hand axis. The solid lines are fits to the data from samples grown without Sb 共upper curve兲 and with Sb 共lower curve兲. On average, the sheet resistance decreases at a rate of ⫺5 ⍀/°C and is further reduced by 120 ⍀/䊐 when Sb codoping is present. The impact of Sb as an isoelectronic dopant in Al0.65Ga0.35As is presented in Fig. 4 for the various growth temperatures. The Sb levels shown here are calculated using the Sb sticking coefficient given in Fig. 2 and the incident Sb/III flux rates. Note that the smallest Sb concentrations 共left-hand side of each curve兲 are for the samples grown with the Sb source off 共Sb/III⫽0.00兲, where the unintentional Sb comes from the Sb background in the growth chamber. In this case, the Sb codoping level calculation is based on the typical 1018 cm⫺3 Sb background levels observed by SIMS measurements on samples grown at 580 °C. The increase in electron mobility with higher Sb codoping levels is clearly seen in Fig. 4共a兲. On the other hand, in Fig. 4共b兲, the electron J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 22, No. 3, MayÕJun 2004 Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02 1439 Johnson et al.: Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs FIG. 4. Electrical properties as a function of the Sb codoping concentration for 1.0 ␮m thick Si doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layers grown at various substrate temperatures. 共a兲 Electron mobility. 共b兲 Electron concentration. concentration shows no observable dependence on the Sb codoping levels. The results of the Be doped Al0.65Ga0.35As samples are summarized in Fig. 5. The rms height of the surface roughness is shown in Fig. 5共a兲 and is less than 1 nm for all four samples. Of the samples grown at 640 °C, the Be doped samples are about three times smoother than the Si doped samples. It is possible that surface segregation of the Be dopant serves as surfactant, resulting in a smoother growth surface at 640 °C. The Be doped samples grown at 580 °C do not exhibit a roughness length scale and the samples grown at 640 °C display a length scale around 200 nm in the 关110兴 direction, similar to that observed in the Si doped samples discussed above. The hole mobility and material resistivity of Be doped Al0.65Ga0.35As are shown in Fig. 5共b兲. Unlike the Si doped material, the Be doped material does not exhibit a change in doping efficiency with the growth temperature; the doping efficiency is 75% for all four samples. The Be impurity and hole concentrations are listed in Fig. 5共b兲. Similar to the Si doped samples, the carrier mobility and material conductivity of the Be doped samples increase with the growth temperature, however, unlike the Si doped samples, Sb as a codopant substantially reduces the carrier mobility and material conductivity. III. DISCUSSION Sb acts as both a surfactant and an isoelectronic dopant in AlGaAs. As a surfactant, Sb provides improved surface mor- 1439 FIG. 5. Surface morphology 共of 1.2 ␮m thick兲 and the electrical properties 共of 1.0 ␮m thick兲 Be doped Al0.65Ga0.35As layers grown at various Sb/III flux ratios and substrate temperatures. 共a兲 rms height and 关110兴 length scale of the surface roughness. 共b兲 Hole mobility and resistivity. phology with the most dramatic improvement occurring in the forbidden temperature gap. During Sb-mediated growth a steady-state surface population of Sb is maintained, enhancing the surface diffusion kinetics of the Ga and Al adatoms. The three-dimensional morphology of AlGaAs layers grown in the forbidden temperature gap is thought to originate from less than ideal Ga and Al transport caused by oxygen gettering on the surface,7 strong anisotropy of surface diffusion,8 the strong Al–As bond,9 and diffusion barriers at island edges.10 The anisotropic diffusion at the atomic scale presumably drives the 200 nm length scale roughness observed in the 关110兴 direction. In which case, the group-V terminated dimer rows perpendicular to the 关110兴 direction oppose group-III adatom diffusion in that direction, while the group-III terminated trenches between the dimer rows assist group-III adatom diffusion in the perpendicular 关 1̄10兴 direction. At higher temperatures above the forbidden temperature gap, Ga and Al diffusion is enhanced, resulting in smoother films. Below the forbidden temperature gap, surface impurities are thought to be more readily incorporated, interfering less with surface mobility, and the Al adatoms tend to stay put thereby avoiding roughening due to anisotropic diffusion. Isoelectronic doping reduces deep levels11 which improves the material properties of Si doped AlGaAs where deep-level traps are not simply arsenic or gallium vacancies, but possibly impurities or gallium/arsenic related complexes.12 Furthermore, isoelectronic doping can reduce unin- JVST B - Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02 1440 Johnson et al.: Sb-mediated growth of n- and p-type AlGaAs tentional impurities and dislocation density in III–V materials.13 As an isoelectronic dopant, Sb yields higher electron mobility and lower sheet resistance in n-AlGaAs:Si and lower hole mobility and higher sheet resistance in p-AlGaAs:Be. An interesting result given that Sb occupies group-V sites and as n and p dopants, both Si and Be impurities occupy group-III sites. The overall doping efficiency of Si in Al0.65Ga0.35As is low because the dominant Si donor level sits well below the conduction band14 and some of the dopant atoms are likely incorporated as acceptors due to the amphoteric nature of Si. The notable temperature dependence of the doping efficiency may be due to an amphoteric behavior of Si atoms in AlGaAs that depends on the growth temperature or that the Si donor activation depends on the growth temperature. Compensation by defects is another possibility, in which case the defect formation would have to depend only on the temperature and not on the Sb codoping or surface morphology. On the other hand, the doping efficiency of Be in Al0.65Ga0.35As is independent of the growth temperature and Sb codoping. IV. CONCLUSIONS Sb-mediated growth improves both the electrical properties and the surface morphology of Si doped Al0.65Ga0.35As; as an isoelectronic dopant Sb increases the electron mobility and as a surfactant Sb reduces surface roughness. The most impressive results occur in the 620– 680 °C temperature 1440 range, essentially eliminating the forbidden temperature gap for n-AlGaAs:Si growth in devices. Sb-mediated growth improves the surface morphology and degrades the electrical properties of Be doped Al0.65Ga0.35As; as a surfactant Sb reduces surface roughness and as an isoelectronic dopant Sb decreases hole mobility. 1 H. Morkoç, T. J. Drummond, W. Kopp, and R. Fischer, J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 824 共1982兲. 2 W. I. Wang, S. Judaprawira, C. E. C. Wood, and L. F. Eastman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 708 共1981兲. 3 R. A. Stall, J. Zilko, V. Swaminathan, and N. Schumaker, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 524 共1985兲. 4 L. P. Erickson, T. J. Mattord, W. P. Palmberg, R. Fischer, and H. Morkoç, Electron. Lett. 19, 632 共1983兲. 5 R. Kaspi, K. R. Evans, D. C. Reynolds, J. Brown, and M. Skowronski, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 379, 79 共1995兲. 6 S. R. Johnson, C.-H. Kuo, M. D. Boonzaayer, W. Braun, U. Koelle, Y.-H. Zhang, and J. A. Roth, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 1502 共1998兲. 7 N. Chand, S. N. G. Chu, and M. Geva, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2874 共1991兲. 8 R. Mirin, M. Krishnamurthy, J. Ibbetson, and J. English, and A. Gossard. J. Cryst. Growth 127, 908 共1993兲. 9 F. Alexandre, L. Goldstein, G. Leroux, M. C. Joncour, H. Thibierge, and E. V. K. Rao, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 950 共1985兲. 10 J. M. Van Hove and P. I. Cohen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 726 共1985兲. 11 C. E. C. Wood, T. M. Kerr, T. D. McLean, D. I. Westwood, J. D. Medland, S. Bright, and R. Davies, J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1300 共1986兲. 12 K. D. Jamison, H. C. Chen, A. Bensaoula, W. Lim, L. Trombetta, and A. Igntiev, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 606 共1989兲. 13 V. K. Bazhenov and V. I. Fistul, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 18, 843 共1984兲. 14 N. Chand, T. Henderson, J. Klem, W. T. Masselink, R. Fischer, Y.-C. Chang, and H. Morkoç, Phys. Rev. B 30, 4481 共1984兲. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 22, No. 3, MayÕJun 2004 Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 209.147.144.21 On: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:58:02