-1-it; l r ^l ,- ) ,'t, v' r'i 9|{a ::#, i v e r .j-/, r /'nt- l)'t<' rtv, .? ;,4 L ., fl (tnt.tf7 f . --'- ' '4 fi t\L' / ? fd';f" 44 * tl --t; ,(,*n4r,+y'> I r)i!.':t I /L/ . '/-,2! 4L . Articles * t Appti cations of Scienee T h e A g e o f S t a n d a r di z a t i o n and Efficiency in Music Education ,* # + JERE T. HUMPHREYS1 From the ancient Greek period to the present, " s c i e ncen word describe has been used to the various nusic, musical learnlng, and aspects of performance. nusical For example, in both Ancient the Greece and in European nedieval unive.rsities, "science of music" meant music theory, or possibly In early America, the study nusic theory. of preachers people Puritan learn the urged to "science" which to then meant reading of nusic, music at singing.by rote. sight as opposed to centuryr Later, during nineteenth the early "scientificn nusic was the nusic of Handel, Haydn, musie was Itlozart, and BeeLhoven, while other The term 'sclence," thought to be 'unscientific." lrhis research was supported in part by a l{est Virginia University Faculty Senate ResearchGrant,. 2n.. wiley Hitchcock, "william Billings and the Y a n k e e T u n e s m i t h sr " H i F i / S t e r e o R e v i e w r" F e b r u a r y 1965,p. 62. g rl il t ir .j; ll g 2 as it related history. f. .$l i$ r. ;.. to education, has an equally varied Beginning in the last two decades of the nine_ , teenth eentury, the term took on new mea.ings i n t h e A r n e r i c a n " aT";c; ;i t i o n a r ?ttd applications worrd. It came to. mean any one or more of t h e f o l l o w ing: ( 1) systernat,ic. appioaches to teaching; (Zl the . grti.ciency-by whi"ir1 given subject was or courd be taught; (3) use of itandard ""iii;;tu and course contenti (4) educational research, (5) teachinq based upon educational or.psychologi""i'd;;;i;;; (5) and schoor administratioi u a s e d - ,-r6pro . b u s i n e s s nanagement principles Regardless its ";;;t neaning, the terrn scientifi6 "J""iiion b e came the watchword of rate nineteenttr-ceniury r e fornist educators. The first widespread attempts to effect a nev, scientific education ,"i" nadi b y e d u c a t o r s and psychologists, who, by studying the physical ; i , a nd intellectual charact!ristic3 i r r d i r r i d u al children' sought to dir""i the focus of the schoors toward specific needs, interests, and growth pro_ cesses of studenrs. Bv rhe 1Bto;; ;i;; widespread, systenatic, d " : . " r i p' tci hv ii i a _ " t rsat uy d y o f c h i l d r e n came to be known as the movement. F,rom the beginning, t!" movenent-reried upon scientific and guasi-scientific m e t h o d s , . s p u r r l-d' e r Uo"nr t b y C h a r l e s Darwin, s writings on evolution, S p e n c e r ,s advocacy of a. scienti!i" ipproach to eaucation, the emergence of the field of lipiricai-p"V"nofoqt; ;;; well-publicized discoveries and appri"-"tion" i n the physical and biological sciences.J' & * '+ t I _ and 3J... T._ Humphreys, ,,The Child-Study ltovement public School ttusic Education; " Journal of 33 (sunierffii-# ou[;;ffi;" e d u c a t i o n s e e L a w r e n c eA . c r e n i n , T h e r iffiiiio,i" 5i"i;;r;: 4ii!i.& -tl$P Sri -:$!-: i# Scientific expand beyond began to r e s e a r c h in education in descriptive studies of children the 1890s. organizat,ions Several influential dedicated to educational research were established around the the National turn of the century: Society for the Scientific Study of Education (the word nscientific" the was dventually dropped), Educational Research Department and the Educational Research Society of The Forun magazine, and the Society of Educational Research. Although researchers and several child-study other educators and psychologists of the Iat.e nineteenth century engaged 1n reeearch on musical learning, interests, and aptitude,'music teachers were apparently either unaware of or not interested in research. They were more interested in the place music's in the expanding and solidifying methods, school curriculum and in teaching especial]y nethods for the of sightteaching singing.' rt is not surprising, then, that some of the earliest attenpts by nusic educators to apply what they considered the nethods of science were to goal teaching the of sight-stngigg, the prlncipal of music teachers of the era.Connecticut, . A nusic supervisor fron t{estfield, was one of Sterrie A. I{eaver, the f i rst. music educators a scientific approach to to advocate music teaching. For several years before his death in 1904, Weaver "tirelessly urged superthe tion of the School: ^ Humphreys, "the = Proqressivisn Child-Study 5sdward in 84. Bailey Birge, History of PubIic School Itlusic in. the United States (Washington, D.C.: Music Educators National Conferenee, L966), p. 113. .? HS F il:3 # ) j: E l; ii i} * 3 1'l # Aner t{ovement," p !: bj,; 4 vrsors . ,- through his sunmerschool, public a d d r e s s e sa n d w r i t . t e n a i t i e r e s t o t a k e a s c i e n t i f i c attitude t o w a r d t h e i r w o r k . " w e a v e r ,s s c i e n t i f i c approach was to t.each each tone and rhythm by rerating then systematicarry to tones and itytrrri previously learned, folrowid by tests of the results, which consisted of itudents singing material at sight from basal series uo6rs A l t h o u g h w e a v e r ' s c o n c e p t o f s c i e n c e a s a p p l i e d i o] music teaching was crude when conpiieo to rater efforts and even to child-study iis"arcn of his d"y, he at least pranted the seel from which more sgehisticated scienlific approachesto music education' would 9row. E d w a r i -e a i r e y s i i g ; c a r l e d h i n the "first e x p o n e n t o f t e s t s a n d n e a s u r e m e n t si n r e a d i n g , t o a n d n o t e d t h a t " t h i s s i-a" n da s, o u t a s 9i9ht his main contribution to schoor-nusic, in the writel':t!,e main co n t r i b u l i o n o f the ^ o p i n i o n period [1885-19051.no j a. * ;.G * t z ip # '' * ,* Another early attenpt to apply the methodEof science to nueic instruclion wai-niae by philip c. Hayden, musl'c supervisor in Keokuk, rovra and edltor p Syguheoeor l - rl t' ryyssi tqg . (l nl tool n r Et h, nl vl y) ), , w hh oo w r oottee a " - rs" er ir;i ;e-s; ; o f :.. . .E { cenrurycitins :e:x: p1e: lr :i n: _e ^n lt ya l" l -s" tIu! "dri e s or hn et .hr eu r pnsoy cf htohr e ogy of rfrythm bf :1 ; psychologist rhaddeus L. iroiton oi'clark 0niverl sity. Hayden wrote that the ear,s tendency t,o ^ Gf L - . - g . r o r p r a p ll ddl lVy ooeeecu ur rrl n. lor g qsnor ur nnddr :s {i nn t} ao ^g?rAor ui ^p- s o tios, threes, and fours had been "scientiticirry d e monStrated, " Set forth in "scientific ordlr, " anrt u 6rbid., pp. a d vo ca te d a t' # * during the 128-31. .'::i.":ill: late Other music educators a p p r o- "a"c" ih"t o r ;.: n u s i c i ; " ; h i ; ; nineteeitni le"e' *, . Jf oi r e x a m Prl:e1, . , .G?€: o r 9 : , N .n e t l e r , ; r r " a " i i " i ' w " o aS ( 1 8 4 5 - 1 9 1 6) : S i n g i.n g Teacher Extr"oidirr"i re, i UPDATE: The * f .-!rFrtr!- * t: + .-d------. 5 "scientifically proved" by Bolton, s experinents.T Hayden also demonstrated his ideas aboul rhythrn at the gducitional 1905 neeting of the National (NEA) and at Association the first two meetings .(1907 and 1909) of what became later the ltusic Supervisors' National Conference (ttSNC).d Hayden may have been the first nusic educator to attlnpt a p p l y r e s u l t 6 p s y chological o f experiments to .tg his own teaching.' :i 1t s * * 'v * 1' P h i l i p C. Hayden, "The place of Rhythm in Classifying and Teaching the Elenents of ltusic,' School ltusic ltlonthlv 7 (January 1906): 23. -R" S e c r e t a r y ' s ltinutes: Department of ltusic Education,' Journal of proceedinqs and Addresses of the National (Winona, Educational Aesociation ltinnesota! National Educational Association, 1905), p: - 6?9, Birge, History of Public School trtusic, pp. 246-47 i and ph ariirg Time,tr School ltusic 10 (ltay-June'1909): 27, 30-35. o -Hayden and certain other music educators of period the were influenced by psychologist G. " recapitulation Stanley tla1l's writings on the theory," but Hall, unlike Bolton, was not primarily an experinentalist. i & *} 4 ;* For infornat,ion on Hayden's interest in recapitulation see ehilip C. Hayden, School titusic ltonthlv 5 (Novenber 1905): lno tit,lel, 28-30. fo the recapitulation theory and ttall, s influence on nusic educators see "Granville Roger Rideout, Stanley Hal1 and lrtusic (Ed.D Education: 1 8 8 0 - 1 9 2 4" dissertation, University of IlIinois, 19?8), and nOn Early 'Psychology in Applications of ltusic Education, ' of Journal Research in ttusic Education 30 ( FaII 1 9 8 2) : L 4 1 - 5 0 . ttltl * 6 EFFICIENCY . Hayden, weaver, and othe16 were influenced by what. by then amounted to a scientific c r a z e Ameriean education. one of ttre-liincrpar goals in the nevr scientific education *ai efficienty,-;tt" of w o r d _ w h i g hb " ! ! e x p r e s s e s t h e i n n e r - " p i r i t of this period. n^' educalor" ,"r" q u i c- k, r " " Jt ,' o s e i z e u p o n efficient management techniquds "o successfulry by induitriar.ists t o l n c r e-aogi -er a nouuf at pcut ut r eadn d reduce waste in the pro{uctlo"goods. A s t. h e y w a t c i r e d . l i n a u - t r y l r phenonenal growth, educatori came tc luetieve'ttrat these nerr, t e c h n i q u e s , w h e n . c o u p l e d ' , , f i t r r - r " i "-"-[ -i fc o ui cf a methods a d v o c a t e d b y c h i l-d - s i u d y leaders; forn a truly scientiric basi;-i;; education. a s s, f & I, ,.i: t$ \ The tern efficiency seems to have meant different things to difie."ni p"opi", so much so that its exact meaning nas sonewhat vague. For exanpte, witlian H. uaxielr, s;;;;inlenoent of rhe New york city _-p u b t i c s c h o o l s , a e i i n " a i t a s t h e '.'d:y.lqpment of each citi zen, f i rst as an individual, a n d s e c o n d a s a m e m b e ro f s o c i e t y , , while psychorogist Edward L. rn"inair" thought of it as the inprovenent or deterioriiion of.nental functions. fhe word was overused for so long by nusic educators that a precise definition is elusive, but for most of then it seems to have meant, simply, ratio of useful work to the e n e r g y e x p e n d e d .. .' ,i f*t.r " l o e i 1 99€€,, 114. airge & f as the H ii ssttoor v nenbodiment' 1lWi11ian B. ciency,' " J o u r n a rl t of of public the spirit School llusic, p. faaver of efficiency. 'Education t{axwell, for Ef f ip r o c e e d il rnlqgss a n d A ,ddddr reesssseass f of o i. on, 1905t; "'iq'!rrFt|F- *: .i' * 7 nas related not only.to the indusEfficiency of Progrefrevolulion but to the new spirit trial estabe d u c a t i o nal A m e r i c a n enbraced by the sivisn nation t h e o f The industrialization lishnent. class m i d d l e I a r g e r a o f developnent the fost.ered B e g i n n i n g in t i n e . I e i s u r e a i r a more wealth with b y . J ohn l e d e d u c a t o r s , 1g90s, Progressive the o p p o r t u n l ! t -9" e d u c a t i o h a l e n h a n c e t ; sougtri o-*.y. m i ddle b u r g e o n i n g t h e o f s t u d e n t s to avai-Iable e x p a n ding b Y s t u d e n t s , a t l t o i n d e e d and "1""", m ore o f f e r i n g s s c h o o l s ' t h e n a k i n g b y a n d curricula P r o g r e s s i ve s o c i e t y ' o f n t e d s t h e t o responsive make the schools to wanted above all educators They set out to change. social for instruments task, iD par!t Py seeking ways to this acconplish with which each subject was improve the efficiency allow tine for which would, Lhey believed, iaignt, in the school cursuuiects of variety a wider disire to inprove teaching From their riculum. arose a need to nreasure the cesults of efficiency or a more precise in lg9rning and teaching mannet.'scientific p. 6Li Edward L. Thorndike, TFe, Ps E C@I L eeaarrnnr inngg, , vv ooLl . z2a: E Feacner; coiiege, - hology of (New Yorks Wright, "Ef f iciency in tlusic p. and Francis 83; piogeedinqs . of the- $gEic of Journal ieaching, " ( D . P ' r L'Lq,, Conference National Supervisorst P. 30. 12ro, and about progres'ivisrn more infornation "The l l i l l e r , v f . T h o m a s see educat,ion music Education, on llusic Progressivism of Influence " Education -Lg ie_Fear!tt_jn_-.![gslc 47, L}LT .Jour4e!_g!_ ( Spring L4 in education see Cremin, The Transprogreisivisn the School; and trtorton whiE@ of fornation ' I ' n e lR e { gev vu rouI t AAqgoar rirnD s t F o r m a i i s m Thr.rrldht 1n Amerl.ca: ' (Boston: Beac *+EF-T.$Sm::ffiffi' ry * t,fr $ t ll: J! {$ r !t F 5 .F .fl f; f i; !: r 8 s !fl. # s r Progressives considered usic an important s u b j e c t w i r h i n r h e s c r r o o f ; " r ;m i;;iumi'a n o ! _ g o u n n o t i c e d b y n u s i c e d u c a tfoarcsr, r h a r 9 i d . eventually c ? T q t o s e e m u s i c a s , , a n i n s t r u m e n tw h o of sociatizarion,'r' rhat could hgip ;i;.;; a person,s rppreciarig?r; idearsl atlitudes, ]n!e: :nt t: a " ,l p e r € and spectives. nl{ Each cfrif a rraa a right to music instruction, and arr oiiiei-tvi." of education, in accordance with his iUifities and interests: not a musicalr;ducation for l i o v i a e t o ;una"ro"iIiil-;rS' alt students wourd bi Despite progressivism,s posture toward nusi"^-"" an appropriate favorable s c f r o o f s u b j ect the fact t h a t m u s i c w i s i r o r e f i r n r y e n t r e n c h e da n d in the schools than ever u"eor", readei"-in t h e f i e r d of nusic education teii pressured t o i n p r o v e t h e s t a t u s o f n u s i c r e l a t-i ev xei-a nt oa e a o t h e r s u b j e c t s v y i n g fg.. a place in th; curricurum. since status' to de?a:e' was determined by the ? , , l : : 9 " perceived efficieniy ritrr which i suuject was taught, they eet out to irfro"" their efficiency by . 13". George payne, nMusic as a tleans of Social- ifiiili;"'" * "1 Jl o h n w. Withers, ',The place c in the S c h e n e o f l t o d e r n D e m o c r a t i c e d u c a i i oorfr , lJt ups"i p "r" and ..eevv.qL.Lru I r r l r r r , E o r q r' ,-ffitfti;i cool€ctlcut: ltusiE-feaEffiET rdi6 f ,r Pp.. zg. * EMM,ffiT]Gsociation, # 15w. nltusic Democratizedr,, otto ltiessner, proceedinss Journal of .-€__E!g_"usic I"r* f 9 developing standards for students and achi"":T"lE tests by wtricn those standards could be measurecl.-STANDARDIZATION one in The issue of standards was an important c e ntury. n i n e t e e n t h education beginning in the late l evels a n d m e t h o d s , teaching iurric,lta, By naking s c h ools, consistent anong teachers, attainrnent of e d u c a t i onal the country, of and regions states, more e n s u r e could they that believed Ieaders like The tern standardization, quality control. fron ! r a 6 _ b o r r o w e d c6mpanion term efficiency, fts the a r o u n d p g p u l a r and became extremely industryl the e f f i c i e n c y , o f ot. the century. Like that turn c o na l w a y s n o t n a a standardization meaning of c o g e nt n o s t t h e o f O n e among users. sistent f o l l o w i n g : t h e i s e d u c a t o r bi a music definitions si has two distinct The word "standardization" to the naking or r e f e r s i t S o n e t i m e s meanings. s o m e t i n e s to the process s t a n d a r d s , defining of accepted- . . ald s t a n d a r d s g e t t i n g of w orld botfrkinds m u s i c a l o u r I n adopted . a t t enpted'-' b e i n g a r e b o t h a n d are needed ' I' 15oth"r music education were ?Iqo of aspects thinking during thig Period, a f f e c t e d b -y s c i e n t i f i c and. certification, training teacher including teaching, school adninisand university college psychological research on music perception trati6n, A and standardized music testing' and leariring, t h e of these topics is beyond treatnent thorough scope of this article. 17w"rdo S. ization, " Teachers' g.F.!, ,'t '4 ry.ry* Pratt, -P a p q r s a n d Natronar nThe Problems of StandardP- rsoscoecel adti fnqgqg o f 9be . {usic (Hartf ord ' j "fr IF .10 r Sterrie pioneers in ili .& fi f s* a r. t philipHayden grere early _atternpt to mlke misic t,eaching a weaver. and science, b u t !! 1h ."" d r i v i n ! f o r c e u e t r i n a - t n " m o v e m ' e n t to improve music's statui through-ct"-trin m o d e so f standardization and effici""cf-. " i s p r o v ided by professionar organizations. The eri o f active _ organizationar i n v o l v e m e n t i n t t r -i sn " ipJn" "i ", " o f m u s i c education began in 1992, when then of Quincy, rltinois, made itre fott;;i;; s r a tenent during an address to a convention of the NEA: There is to-day no statenent enbodying a course of study to serve as guide'to inguiring t e a c h e r s o r s u p e r i n t e n d e n t s o- i-- = i i t i " g the kind of wor k wr r ich shour d be r "g"ir "a of different g r a d e s i n t h e s c t r o o i i - r r r i " t r c a r r i the es the sanction of any number of influential teachers, as for iistance of this the National Educational asio;i"ai;;. t6"ai;;-;; connecticut: ltusic Teachers' Nationar Association, l : 9 1 . 4 [ 1 9 1 5] ) _ p . 1 5 8 . T h o u g hm u s i c e d u c a t o r s u n _ d o u b t e d l y w o ul r d iravg_attenpted to stanJirdize music instruction even if t h e i e r r a a u e e n - - n os c i e n t i f i c movement in education, thei, it i"riig was in_ f l u e n c e d b y t h. a t n o . r e r . n t . ' -1-nP h i f i p g. Hayden, "ltusic in public Educat,ion, and some Erenents Essentiar to--iis proceedings and Adareiies suceess,' Journal of of the s # $ * f 1' !. t"-affi raiz t1Be3t), pp. 531-32. See Chester N. Channon,-iTh. Contrib u ti o n s of phtlip cady Hayden to nuiii Educ ati on i n the United States" (pa.ol dissertiiio", Universiiy of-.Michlgan, 1958), p . 33, for tt.-iUo"" quotation (although- misquoted -and -incorrectrycited) and additional infornation about Hayden?sinterest in efficiency and standardization. -------=F-J "r * i ? .* T ,:: . 11 After Hayden's address, the NEA's music departnent adopted a five-part resolution outlining a set of goals for school music instruction. Through this resolution the nusic departnent declared its belief in value of the developnent of sight-singing, the quality, intonation tone and blend, nusical taste, and expressive singing. According to Bi(9e, this "seems to have been the first resolution ever professional framed by a schggl-nusic regarding the ains of school nusic."'- * t * $ * body The next inportant step toward the establishment of standards for grade schools was taken in 1903 with the publication of PhiIip Haydegfis list of objectives for the first four grades.-That same year, Hayden introduced a motion that evenformation of an NEA comin the resuLted tually der{?Iop.a course of study for the first to nittee grades.o^ The commit,tee's report, presented eight 1 t ' 0B i r g e , Historv of PubIic School ltusic, PP' 234-35. "t ne h i l i p C. Hayden, in F o ur yelrs Fi rst the ( I { a r c h 2 8. 1 9 0 3 ) : t{onthlv 9 zt t t B i r g e "An outline School, " in ltlusic for School ltusic Fchool l|!r9icr p. ired this cominpiies 23gl of Phtlip Channon (n1he Contrlbutlons intle "fti"", says that llayden served as 35) Cady ilayden," P. g t e a v e r was appointed chair in 1903 in fact, chair. (by a nonrinating connittee chaired by Hayden), -and death in 1904 by Hayden' his aiter roa'" replaced " s l c r e t a r y ' s Department of l{usic lrlinutes: See p r o c e e d i n qs and Addresses of Education,tr Joirrnal of (Boston: Educat,ional Associatlo-q National the ), p. 694; DePartment of l'lusic Minutes: and "Secretary's Educatiofir" .rournal of Proceedings and Addresses of (ltistory of PubIic * fl # L2 in 19.03, detailed rather specific musical requirements for eaeh grad,e,aa and generated a great deal of hope for the future on the part of music supervi sors . bther organizations soon followed t h e N E A ,s The ltusic Teachers' Nat,ional Association (llrNA) first addressed the guestion of standards at its 1907 neeting, and propoJed a set of examinaticq questions grammar school students in LgOg,45 for perhaps the first questions test for students developel by a professional body in music education. The fledgling r , r s N Ca r s o b e c l n e i n v o l v e d w i t h standardization and efficiency, but concerned itself at first with the nore Linitea subject of efficiency in sight-singing instruction. Its committee appointed to standirdize methods for the teaching of music reading reported in 1910 that lead ,'.f, * # 4 tr : rt the pp. : t* is Natlonal 675-76. '..i (winona, "n' 1904); tt "philip nReport c. Hayden, Chairnan, of Comnittee on What Results Should be Obtained in the Study of tlusic in the Eight Grades of the public Schools, r Journal tlg_Ngtiollal * * * * * Educationql__4FEociation , Egucqtional Association (Winona, PP. 667-68; and Philip C. Hayden, Chair, rReport ;; connittee of Ten: what nesults should be oLtained in. the of ltusic in the Eight Grades of the _study Public Schoolsr" .school ltuelg Uon!!f.y G (September 1 9 0 5) : 5 0 - 5 1 . -) '?R a l p h L. Baldwin, Chai rman, "Repo;pt of the Conmittee on Grannar School Requi rementl, ', School I r l u s i c 1 0 ( l { a r c h 1 9 0 9) : 1 0 - 1 1 . 13 "economy 1s the modern educatiogn uld word in rn economic ones."-m u s t b e t e a c h i n g rnetlhods- in b y u P d r a w n c o u r s e i o f s t u d y P ! ! f g s ; t o adciltion published several individuals iic :iat organizations, p e r i o d ' t h i s d u r i n g c o u r s e s r o w n ttre,i for high school subjects cour6es standardized vrere developed at about the same tine as those fot During the nineteenth eenturyr elementary slhools. when a lirge proportion oi students attending nigl school high the college, ittlnaea also school by colleges through had been dictatid curriculum By th9 tYTl of entrance requirements. setting the century, dS more and more students who did the of began to attend high college inter plan to not schooi, high schools became morgqaccountable to the of This division Iocal .conmunities.o' denands oi in a power vacuuD that was filled left authority part by professional education organizations. * * ? ill G "the first construcfor high school music, n u sic aE a s c h o o l high organize to attenpt tive resulted b a s i s n rnajor study and on a iegular credit c o mmittee a b y L 9 0 2 in developed in a course the- New b y a conferencg6 sponsored, at appointed which r t s s y l l a b u s , League.o' Education eirllana c o u n t e r p o int, music theory, in studies iniluded As ") At E l s i e l{. shaw, R e a d i n g ," J o u r n a l o f Suoervisors p. 37. nstandardization of Sight' Procgedinqs 9f the ,Iy:ic . p . . 1 9 1 0) , 2SJ"t"" R . A n g e 1 1 , " T h e C , - n b i n a t i o n o f C er t i f " Thc School Review icate and Exanination Systene, 20 (ltarch 1912): 145-46. )' o RB i r g e , 168. History of PubIic School l*lusic, p' t t t? L4 form, biography, history, e n d o r s e d b y t h e r , l T N Aa n d t n " and applied 4qsic, NqA i;-igO-a.", was This gras a first step, but it did not resolve satisfactoriry t h g p r o bllm of hi;h school cur. riculum contint in nusic. rn response to the problen, a group prof essional o.g"rri-""tions, led b y t h e E a s t e r n E d_ uocf a l i o n a l r , r u s i c c o n f e r e n c e and the England Education League, proposed an innovafgt i* !1i 9f :0 6 , p l a n the in * .L to setrle the issue. in-if," spring of c o r r e g e E n t r a n c e E x a m i n a t i o nB o a r d f o r N e w E n gland and the ltiddle Atlantic stiies -io ac c epted th9 plan, which required correfes administer entrance exaninationJ in muslc aia to accept high school credits in muslc. The plan incruded a c c e p t a n c e o f c r e d i t f o r a p p l i e d m u s i c s t u d y wti ht rer quarif ied teachers outside al,e high sctroor. s c h o o r i n c h e r s e a , l r a s s a c t r u s e i [ s i m f i e m e n tie oh i ; h plan in the fal.t of 1900. rn suuseq.r-ii year6 the many other cities awarde{ocredit for m u s i c s tudy a;;ii;e outside tha school. ao * i 1. 27eor nore information.about . this proposar see Richard Lee - Dunham, nllusic Appreci"-tio' in the Fublic Schools of the U n i t e d b t-ilir"i"; ,; i 9 d nf 8, g Z _ f g 3 0 " ( Ph.D. dissertation, University "t96l ) , p. 31. -) A- B i r g e , 1 6 9 -77L1.. { Hirt ilusic, pp. ollege e * t ::::::::-,::qlirenenrs- *. * nlial fi Wact i g U o ngadl i n gAss s o c : [ a in nueic aac o""iir,-;;;;i: ioili"n"il;; i"IiE=ii"il;1"$:; "!:l]:r"-_:"r::l!!,9reait; o --i; r rh; ilsi; ;;";;;;;, I o^o Errt----- -i-e:t3-irgz Ple+ A=?logiati natftiEl-association, 4| t, T:l:l:."' r6 2 -6 6 -a!re ! i iE PP. -, --e -.-", l5 O T H E RS C I E N T I F I C A P P T I C A T I O N S The scientific movenent ln nusic education encompassed considerably nore than efftciency and the developnent of standard courses of study for programs lrere school students. ltusic studled "objectively" fornal thr6ugh Iarge numbers of of city and state school systerns conducted surveys during The the first one-third of the century. school-survey novenent and other descriptive research activities fostered the developnent of permanent educational research bureaus by cities, state departments of education, universit,ies, teachers colleges, foundations. and independent These agencies nere often called efficiency bureag5 and staffed by persons calIed efficiency experts.-An increasing anareness of science by music educators manifested itself also in the actions of certain individuals who sought to establish closer ties to the field of psychology. Several music educators, for example, yrere influenced by CarI E. Seashore's experinents on musical aptitude testing conducted in the nusic laboratory at the University of Iowa. Other prominent music educators either psychological experinented in laborat,ories or attenpted to found their own: Karl 9f. GehrkenE at (1910), Oberlin College Charles ll. Farnsworth aL (1917), and Teachers CoIIege, Columbia University Osbournqn l{cConathy Northwest,ern University at (19171.'still another exanple of the degree of -? -q J e r e Hunphreys, "llusic Education and the T. School-Survey ltov^ment,nThe Bulletin of HistgEig?I ( Januar y 1987) : I l tu si c e d u c-tfon Research in 33-43. 2 ' "nF r a n k T. Lendrim, t'Music for Every ehild: The Story of Karl WiIson Gehrkens" ( Ph.D. dissertation, t l i c h i g d o , L 9 6 1 ), p p . 2 0 - 2 3 ; w i l l i a m of University * il & il t i ''1. ; t t ? s# 15 interest in psycl?Jogywas an unsuccessful. , T9y1:2i " atternpt in 1 t o e " -yi "i ti o i rri oi t9ei""-ai n r l " - s l c t i,oTnN A , s seerion rir!^-rf". musie -ii'un"um o fe ntrh e Association' ror"--ti" Sliliillrt . or OBSTACLES * * * s f tJi,s 'i :,]' The scientific experienced serious novement- in music education J- -i ireeri i";"; r; ;t -i "- " ili, ttr. outset. Althoush oroponents m e t h o d sw o u i d scienrific p r o v i l e s o l u t i o n "i "l ;i ti : o o l all n ost if not the perceivgg m u s i c e d u c a t o r s a i a ;- ;n; ;Jit; -i ,i " r i e vf "e" r l . g r h e f i e t d , o t h e r " s h o u r J - 6 " - " p p r o " cthf readt m u s i c i n s t r u c _ scientiricarry. ;i:' r::i:: -E;; -'""?iiii* e,llind:ii .i:.Hi rr,u ! I - i ; ;i;*ffi ; dardizarion. t Ui: . _ : _ r a i ; i ; r & i ' ' " r", dr h e were,,scien_ "on"i"iing ,,onry :i:i:""tlo"lln"arance t h a6nlv, t w a s " r n , r o - J ! r r " " or or selectiv".I3tton" cri tical Three najor problenrs to pered d e v e l o p a s c i i n c e - J i - r , rhsarm ; - ; i l " ; i ; ;t h o s e w h o s o u q h t durins lrre R. Lee, "Edr li;,t:f;n;te sltiiii:"l"ollr",ii:diii:; -';i;":lj'"i"r*,Yli""i"i!i" iru-:t "; Kenrucky, ,-:s1zj n. n "os6"".ij Platt, M M ccCcoonna a t hrih r :y :^ i rm . re i rai rc^a niE--;-;-i!i " - q . . I u " u i : : : 1 , , ' o sbourie -a;;;;; xesearchin A uusic educaf iJi 2r te+ii:# 31nl*tinutes -of the AnnuaI }|eeting, n 'F + fr * f tratTonEI-tE"; " i ; t i ; n]', ; i; " = ; i ; i ;i i ; f i ;; 32nichard ,,- {Xilrr]".*' Boone, s"i"rr". !3use chaiies--i"i;o. -'--rff*-: . rs L7 first two decades of the century. One was that the profession sinply could not agree upon goals for music instruction in the schools. Sone music educators, for example, did not believe that the teaching of sight-singing should be the nain purpose of school music. One of these individuals was Charles Farnsworth, who complained that the field "makes sight singing its goal.n He,did adnit that an emphasis on sight-singing had the advantage'of "formal Iending itself to nethods" and ease of "dear measurement, naking sight-singing to the hearts of many teachers in systenatized schools," but he preferred insfqad to eoncentrate on mi.reic's gualitie6."" aesthetic This failure to reach a consensus inpeded the developnent of standard nethods of instruction, standards for achievement, and nethods for neasuring the results of instruction, and rendered irnpossible the dream of a science of nusic education with efficient rnethods of instruction and evaluation tailored to each student The second rnajor problen facing scicntifically ninded music educators nas that the nscience of education" was stilI very nuch ln its infancy. Terns were not well defined and were used quite loosely. Research techniques enployed so eitensively generations by later of educational researchers--sanpling, €xperinental controls, correlational nethods, just and the like--were beginning to be discovered and developed. e Lrue "science of educationn yras at that tlnc in reality Iittle nore than a dream. -he tors of third the difficulty was aet nost music educaearly twentieth century, like their 33crrur 1es llusic M- ffi (ttew H. Farnsworth, Education York: Anerican Book @ Through a f fif 6 * ti + & ;{i iii i' ir # i. !*.',ir*:,:,.-..-d.,&:, .-:-'::. 18 counterparts during the child-study era, were u n a v r a r eo f o r i n d i f f e r e n t to scientific principles. fiost vrere lightly educated--undergraduate degrees in music education were just beginning to bicome popular and graduate prograns in musii education were very few in number--and there vrere few journals accessible to nusic teachers that included results of music research.t" rn fact, a content analysis of the first long-standing rnagazine devoted to nusic educatioft, School Uusig_lUonlhfy.l, founded and edited Uy'fen i distinctly non-scienqfiii :i ortlntatlon, e s p e c i a l l y ',rt before the nid-1920s. tt .* * il* ir; f fl' { .*r None of these problens deterred proponents of scientific nusic education, who continlalty compared educat,ion to the tield of nedicinel predicting that . tine and hard work wourd provide'the answers they so urgently sought. By ibout 1915, however, profession was b-coning increasingly the frustrated over its inability to agiee upon goiri for school nusic, to establiltr a siientiiic Sasis for music education, and to raise music fron its perceived inferior position within the hierarchy of the scho.ol curricurun. Leaders were.paintirlty aware that the first courseg of study aiopted bir the NEA ( 1905 ) , the ritTNA ( 1909 ) , ind-tire nSNa (1910) had never been used extensively,so targely because of the profession's lnabltity t; agree upon - t :l i! ): ;r 34J"r. T. Hunphreys,,,periodical Literature in Itlusic Education: A ttistorical Oveiview, " UpDATE: The Applications of *""" 6 *, -2 -RE e n r y E u g e n e K a r J a l a , ' A C r i t-i icpat lr l o .A n a l y s i s o f s-chgol--.Tusic rrtagazini fg6o-r936; dieserta_ c t o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f t { i n n e s o t a , 1 9 7 3i . # I# 35th"dd",r" $F. p. Giddings, Music 15 (January1914):6. ----F-tv v fi ':' : :- ': r . _ t * n P e d a g o g y ,n School 19 music educators struggled goals. Increasingly, goals and nethods while watching other fields *ittr what were perceived to be well-organized inplenint tests sophisticated courses of study and relatively results. there was considerable to measure the nethods used in nusic leaching rtere that coircern than those used for other subjects, efficient Iess of other and teachers aCrninistrators and that in d e f i c i e n c i e s o f t h e a l l e g e d were aweqe subjects f e l t a l s o l { u s i c e d u c a t o r s nusic education.'' w h i c h g o v e r n m e n t s , p r e s s u r e f r o n s t a t e increasing f c i r s c h o o l s p r o p o s e s t a n d a r d s l e g i s l a t e d began to of the a move opposed by the naJority and teacher;" of these Pressures, profession.'" As a result issues paranoiac about always educators, nusic d u r i n g the n o r e s o b e c a m e e v e n status, related to t h e c e n t u r y . o f ' second decade .ll ',,i1 .* t{: * t THE }IODERNERA of 'the f i rst director the walter S. llonroe, of Bureau of Educational Research at the University wrote that the "pioneer stage" of educaIlinriis, ended around 1918, and that the research tional i- I ' li 'l i t, Ir 37rbid., pp. 6-7i and J.l Beach Cragun, 'A Psychological Analysis of the Basis on l{hich Credit f or Study l . t u s ic i s t o b e P l a c e d , ' the of School l l u s i c 1 5 ( S e p t e n b e r 1 9 1 4) : 1 4 . -?-nF r e d e r i c k "The I leal Basis of Schlieder, n Standardization, PaDers and Proceedinge of the Irlusic Teachers' W 6sociation, 1 9 1 s t 1 9 1 5 1 )p . 1 5 9 . :E-ffif ffi, *T=T *" E + 20 il a" € fl 4 ri& ii * field .,[,hen passed into the "quantity production', stage. -The' same can be said for research in music education. The profession comnitted itself to research with the estabrishment of the r,tsNc Educational council in 1918. rn keeping with one of purposes, to "standardize moiE [horoughly . its various phases of school music work,qu the educal tional Council, s fi rst publication outlined detailed standard courses of itudy,for srade school students and nusic supervisors... et about the same tine the profegsion saw the publication of the first s t a n d a r d i z e d t e s t s o f n u s f g i r a 'p t l t u d e ( 1 9 1 9 ) and nusical achievenent (L920.){4 :1 39wult". s. ltonroe et dI. , Ten E d u ca tion Resear ch, 1919- _lg??, iufffi years Bureau of Educational 3. ;l"iri--"i R e s e a r c h , L g } ' g l, p , of rttinois: 4O.loh' nThe l,tusic w. Beattie, Supervisors, National Conference,', leper_E_qlld proceediircs of the llusic Teachers' Nati ssociation, L920 [1921]), p. 93. 4lltsHc Educationar Standard Course of $ counci.r, Burretin srudL__i-g- lt5ig Number 1, and irii"i"i n.p. , L g Z L l. For more lnrormatron see Fred Anthony !{arren, "A History of 'the the ltusic Education neselrch council and Journal of Research in ilusic Education of the nusic di;s;;id'di;;; t University ; E. Seashore, Don Lewis, and Joseph G. Saetvei t . Seashore ltgg_illfgg of ltusical Taients (New York: and Frank A. Beach with H.E. Schramrnel, €d., Beach ? 42carl of ltichigan, 1 9 6 5) , p p . L S _ r i . 2L research in music education won nany Scientific new adherents during the 1920s and 1930s as it fron increasing wealthr benefited national €xpanding music prograns, more highly educated music methods, a teachers, more sophisticated statistical nunber of and larger standardized musical tests, programs. research ne\,r graduate ltany prominent music educators came to believe that "nothing short reorganization of music teaching of a scienlific wiII serve,"-- while others found nuch to criticize in the approach. Nevertheless, music education nodern era entered the during t,hat period, and, for except a significant decline ln enphasis on testing beginning in the Iate 1930s, the practice of research in nusic education, along scientific with some debate over its pertinence, has continued unabated to the present day. --Arizona C # * * I State University r, + ; P t ll ir Standardized ltusic Tests (Enporia, Kansas: Bureau nts, Kansas State Normal S c h o o l , 1 9 2 0) . d - -1J . Lawrence Erb, "[usic Teaching: A Trade or a Profession?' Papers and Proceedings of the llusic Teachers' Natio L920 aI Association, tL921l), p. 107. w. G # .x