An Experiential Pedagogy for Sustainability Ethics Abstract: This project is developing and testing a new approach to teaching engineering and science students that leverages their interest in experiment and experience. Unlike a traditional liberal arts pedagogy involving reading about ethics, discussing the readings, and writing new analyses, this pedagogy uses games to position students in a series of potentially adversarial relationships that force them to confront some of the salient problems of sustainability, including environmental externalities, the Tragedy of the Commons, weak vs. strong sustainability and intra-generational equity. Recent tests allow students at different universities to play the games simultaneously using information communication technologies (ICT). In each game, students must ask themselves the questions related to moral cognition , "What are my obligations to my fellow students?” and moral conation, “What am I willing to risk in my own sense of well-being to meet these obligations?" We hypothesize that this approach will result in students that are actively engaged in learning exercises, and result in an improved ability to identify ethical problems, pose potential solutions, and participate in group deliberations with regard to moral problems. Students are encouraged to communicate face to face with their classmates during class, as well as via information communication technologies (ICT) outside of class and with students located at other universities using (e.g., Twitter, ethicsCORE). • Provide background for sustainability issues • Introduce related theory and general ethical codes of conduct • Assigned readings • PowerPoint lecture • Educational videos Active Experimentation Concrete Experience • Learn how the game works • Directly experience ethical decision making • Determine effective strategies • Sharpen deliberation skills • Identify desired outcomes • Practice discourse ethics • Experiment with game calculator • Navigate non-cooperative situations • Discuss possible outcomes of various strategies and • Role playing Negotiating & thought experiments deliberating • Experiment with online • Opportunities for collaboration tools leadership and teamwork • Graded writing assignments • Students apply theory by such as essays, wikis, publically hypothesizing tweets, and discussion about expected behavior board entries • Students develop interpretations and Results: conceptualizations of sustainability problems Outcomes The students know in advance that their performance during the game will result in a grade. The games are designed so that students must confront the moral dilemma of advancing their own grade at the expense of others Assessments Activities Objectives Abstract Conceptualization from Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, May DR. 2011. Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review. 36(4):663-685 • Game strategy • Some students emerge as group leaders at this stage • Individual and average grades • Communication record • Observation of game-play interactions • Sharing of game points Reflective Observation • Develop realizations of individual moral fiber • Confront discrepancies between what they say they would do and what they actually did • Compare hypothesis to results • Relate to real-world collective action problems • Debate the actions of other students • Classroom discussions • Reflective writing assignments • Graded reflection essays on their experience and/or how they might redesign system for more cooperation • Relationships and trust • Group tacit knowledge between students • Students alter their perceptions and • Heightened emotions and interpretations of theory memories and conceptualizations • Teamwork skills • Improve ability to improvise • Student increase awareness of the perspectives held by • A sense of accountability to others others Classroom experiences are consistently characterized by surprising, emergent behavior and high quality discussions. Issues concerning leadership, transparency, risk and trust dominate discussion. Twitter Participation Participating students reveal deep parallels between their game-play experiences and real-world problems, such as climate change and other environmental issues. 100 90 MMU ASU RIT Game modules have been tested at a number of Universities including Rochester Institute of Technology, Purdue University, Dartmouth and Arizona State. A recent game experiment allowed students at ASU, RIT and Mountains of the Moon University (located in Uganda) to simultaneously play an externalities game. Plotting the participation of students on Twitter during game-play reveals a power law relationship; most of the contributions to the group are made by just a few extremely active individuals. These students provide a critically important role as moral leaders That set expectations for other students. Number of Tweets 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 y = 164.14x-1.299 R² = 0.8677 10 0 Students