Final Presentation July 2017 First-last mile environmental lifecycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles CHRISTOPHER G. HOEHNE – DOCTORAL STUDENT M I K H A I L V. C H E S T E R – A S S O C I AT E P R O F E S S O R C I V I L , E N V I R O N M E N TA L , & S U S TA I N A B L E E N G I N E E R I N G A R I Z O N A S TAT E U N I V E R S I T Y Outline  Project motivation  Project overview and scope  Project methodology & data  Life cycle impacts (per passenger mile)  Multimodal impacts (per passenger trip)  Reducing 10% of system GHG impacts Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 2 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Motivation in transportation  There is a strong understanding of the environmental impacts from unimodal trips.  There is limited knowledge of the environmental impacts from multimodal trips.  Very limited knowledge of impacts from automobile access and egress with transit. Sources: Chester et al. 2013, LA Metro Project Overview  Assess impacts generated from 10 LA transit systems and LA automobiles.  Transit systems included:  Metro Light Rail Transit (LRT, 4 lines)  Metro Heavy Rail Transit (HRT, 1 line)  Commuter Rail Transit (CRT, 1 line)  Metro Local Bus  Metro Rapid Bus  Metro Express Bus  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT, 1 line)  LA Auto:  25 MPG sedan Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 4 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Modal Split in LA Modal Split Transit Modal Split 1% 3% 3% 3% 2% NonMotorized, 14% Blue 6% Purple/Red 10% Orange/Silver 3% Auto, 82% Non-Motorized Metro Transit Bus 73% (Local/Rapid/Express) Auto Other Estimate via California Household Travel Survey (Caltrans, 2013) Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 5 Final Presentation | July 2017 Bus Blue Gold BRT Expo Heavy Rail Green Estimate via LA Metro boardings (LA Metro, 2016) First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Life-Cycle Assessment Scope  Vehicle manufacturing  Infrastructure construction  Electricity production and generation  Material and fuel extraction  Vehicle operation & maintenance  Infrastructure operation & maintenance © Hydro-Québec Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 6 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Life Cycle Grouping Automobiles/Buses Rail System Boundary Vehicle Manufacturing  Vehicle Manufacturing  Battery Manufacturing  Transport to Point of Sale  Train  Transport to Point of Sale Operation  Propulsion  Idling  Propulsion  Idling Maintenance  Typical Maintenance  Tire Replacement  Battery Replacement  Typical Train Maintenance  Train Cleaning  Flooring Replacement Construction  Roadway  Track  Station Operation  Roadway Lighting  Herbicide Use  Track, Station, and Parking Lighting  Herbicide Use  Train Control  Miscellaneous (Escalators, Equipment) Maintenance  Roadway Maintenance  Track and Station Maintenance Parking  Curbside Parking  Dedicated Parking  Gasoline/Diesel/Natural Gas Extraction, Processing, & Distribution  Raw Fuel Extraction and Processing, Electricity Generation, Transmission & Distribution Infrastructure Energy Production Extraction, Processing, & Distribution Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 7 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Data & Tools Trip data:  California Household Travel Survey (CHTS, 2012-13)  LA Metro On-board Surveys (2013 – current) Transit operational data:  Ridership & Operation Reports (2013 – current)  Engineering design documents, Google Earth Life-cycle Modeling:  Modeling tools including SimaPro, GREET, CiRNLCA, and other components  EcoInvent and EIOLCA database and empirical studies Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 8 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles LA Metro Rail Energy Use Yearly LA Rail System Energy Use vs System Passenger Miles Traveled (PMT) * Reflects 2013-2014 data Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 9 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Bus & Metrolink Drive Cycles  Local, Express, and Rapid Bus drive cycles were estimated by matching similar empirically tested cycles in similar buses (excluding Orange BRT).  Estimated system fuel consumption (based on mileage) was 4% lower for buses, and 7% lower than locomotives.  Metrolink drive cycles developed from similar locomotive operation impacts from Fritz (1994). Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 10 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Trip Characteristics (CHTS)  Trip characteristics determined for each region/transit system.  Aggregation at the zip code level, over 900 sub-regions.  Auto trips are shorter distance than transit for same ODs. Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 11 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Transit Access & Egress in LA Access & Egress Modes (2012-13 CHTS) 3% 16% 95% Metro Bus Walk/Bike Auto Access Mode (2012-13 Metro Surveys) 11% 26% 79% 85% Metro Rail Metro Bus Other Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 12 Final Presentation | July 2017 Walk/Bike 68% Metro Rail Auto Other First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Per Passenger-mile Impacts GHGs (g CO2e/PMT) Respiratory (mg PM2.5e/PMT) Smog (g O3e/PMT) Note that auto trips in LA are ~2 pax per trip Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 13 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles GHGs per Passenger-Trip GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (kg CO2e per passenger trip) Auto occupancies may be lower when accessing or egressing transit Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 14 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles GHGs per Passenger-Trip GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (kg CO2e per passenger trip) Local Bus + Auto: Uncommon, high access distance Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 15 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Local vs Remote Impacts Per Passenger Trip Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 16 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles Present Reducing 10% of GHG Impacts Percent Shift Away from Auto Access/Egress Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 17 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles la.transportationlca.org REPORT and DATA chris.hoehne@asu.edu mchester@asu.edu /in/chrishoehne /in/mikhailchester/ GHGs per Passenger-Trip (Long Term) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (kg CO2e per passenger trip) Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 19 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles GHGs per Passenger-Trip (Long Term) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (kg CO2e per passenger trip) Local Bus + Auto: Uncommon, high access distance Hoehne & Chester | Arizona State University | Slide 20 Final Presentation | July 2017 First-last mile environmental life-cycle assessment of multimodal transit in Los Angeles