WEBVTT

00:00:11.489 --> 00:00:13.489
We place very complex machines on the top of huge vertical structures, the

00:00:15.329 --> 00:00:19.826
size of a 34 story tall building. We
proceed to light these explosives and

00:00:19.859 --> 00:00:23.015
the whole structure along with
valuable contents are shut up so high they

00:00:23.048 --> 00:00:27.186
end up in space or plant. We call
these rocket launches and we

00:00:27.219 --> 00:00:30.686
collectively species are from one of
them around every two weeks and we

00:00:30.719 --> 00:00:34.676
have been doing them for at least 40
years right now. At this very moment

00:00:34.709 --> 00:00:38.646
, there are six humans just like you
and me currently traveling at seven

00:00:38.679 --> 00:00:44.237
kilometers per second. That is almost
16,000 MPH at 400 kilometers in

00:00:44.270 --> 00:00:48.976
altitude inside a pressurized box. We
call the International Space Station.

00:00:49.009 --> 00:00:52.195
All of this is incredibly exciting, of
course, but it is also incredibly

00:00:52.228 --> 00:00:56.856
dangerous and crazy. Why would anybody
do such a thing? We don't just

00:00:56.889 --> 00:01:00.695
perform these activities for the sake
of proving the limits of humanity.

00:01:00.728 --> 00:01:04.286
But there's a fundamental benefit of
why we're doing them being in space

00:01:04.319 --> 00:01:07.156
gives you an unparalleled perspective
that allows you to look back down to

00:01:07.189 --> 00:01:11.105
your world in ways not achievable.
Otherwise imagine being lost in a cord

00:01:11.138 --> 00:01:15.706
. I don't know how we get into that
position. But if you were able to know

00:01:15.739 --> 00:01:20.165
what it looked like from above,
everything would be so much easier. Well,

00:01:20.198 --> 00:01:23.087
satellites provide a similar vantage
point. They know what everything

00:01:23.120 --> 00:01:25.605
looks like from the top because
they're up there in space. Looking back

00:01:25.638 --> 00:01:29.467
down to us all the time. This is very
valuable information that allows us

00:01:29.500 --> 00:01:33.156
to solve problems. They in fact make a
lot of aspects of our modern lives.

00:01:33.189 --> 00:01:36.956
For example, the GPS service you may
have used to navigate here, the

00:01:36.989 --> 00:01:39.915
weather forecast you may have seen
this morning and the telecommunications.

00:01:39.948 --> 00:01:43.227
We all love to use the internet,
telephone radios. All of these things

00:01:43.260 --> 00:01:47.766
depend in one way or another in by
satellites machines we humans have sent

00:01:47.799 --> 00:01:52.007
into space. Then there's science,
scientific breakthroughs and discoveries

00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:56.555
in physics, astronomy, even biology
are very often oriented in spacecraft

00:01:56.588 --> 00:02:00.135
like the Hubble space telescope in
International Space Station, Space

00:02:00.168 --> 00:02:04.016
Exploration, we today have high
resolution images of the planets and the

00:02:04.049 --> 00:02:07.626
moon of our solar system. We have even
imaged planets on the habitable

00:02:07.659 --> 00:02:11.725
suns of stars older than our own sun
places where we might want to find

00:02:11.758 --> 00:02:16.156
life. We have placed humans and robots
too on the surfaces of the objects

00:02:16.189 --> 00:02:20.077
of our solar system. Objects once
considered to be God by the ancient

00:02:20.110 --> 00:02:23.957
humans. Clearly, there's a fundamental
benefit and advantage of being in

00:02:23.990 --> 00:02:28.156
the space. This begs the question, why
don't we go there? More often. Well

00:02:28.189 --> 00:02:32.196
, it is stupidly expensive to go to
space right now. That's why. And

00:02:32.229 --> 00:02:35.225
there's multiple reasons why going to
space is expensive. First, there's

00:02:35.258 --> 00:02:38.376
the obvious one, like building a
rocket, the size of a building, fill it

00:02:38.409 --> 00:02:42.017
with explosives and cry generally
cooling. It tends to be a bit expensive

00:02:42.050 --> 00:02:44.636
and it certainly doesn't help at all
that after we are done with the

00:02:44.669 --> 00:02:47.737
launch, we let the thing crash into
the ocean and sink so we can go keep

00:02:47.770 --> 00:02:50.677
company to the Titanic.

00:02:50.710 --> 00:02:53.856
But even though the whole whole rocket
thing is expensive, this is not the

00:02:53.889 --> 00:02:58.327
real reason why going to space is
expensive after all, on average rocket

00:02:58.360 --> 00:03:02.335
launches and the cost of that is only
about a 10% of the total cost of a

00:03:02.368 --> 00:03:07.106
space mission. So where is the rest of
my money going? Space is expensive

00:03:07.139 --> 00:03:10.975
because we're stuck in a vicious cycle
and allow me to explain, we have a

00:03:11.008 --> 00:03:14.457
starting point. We're designing,
constructing and operating a space

00:03:14.490 --> 00:03:18.136
mission is expensive now because the
space is expensive. We can only

00:03:18.169 --> 00:03:21.386
afford so many of them. And there's a
low number of space missions because

00:03:21.419 --> 00:03:24.186
it's a low number of space missions.
When you get the opportunity to send

00:03:24.219 --> 00:03:27.786
something to space, you really, really
want to make sure it works. After

00:03:27.819 --> 00:03:31.536
all, you may have been waiting for
this opportunity for the last 20 years.

00:03:31.569 --> 00:03:35.217
Something not unheard of in the
industry. These proportionate resources

00:03:35.250 --> 00:03:39.327
are spent into guaranteeing the
success of these missions. Redundancy,

00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:42.487
open redundancy, quality checks,
background checks and additional harding

00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:45.866
for all materials. All of these things
cost money. They are up and in the

00:03:45.899 --> 00:03:49.207
end end up being the majority of the
cost of emissions leading us to more

00:03:49.240 --> 00:03:53.116
expensive missions. And the cycle
repeats itself expensive mission leads

00:03:53.149 --> 00:03:56.967
to low number of whose success wants
to be guaranteed no matter the cost

00:03:57.000 --> 00:04:00.717
leading to more expensive missions and
we're stuck, space is expensive

00:04:00.750 --> 00:04:06.957
because failure is not an option. But
what if it was? What if we embrace

00:04:06.990 --> 00:04:11.156
the possibility of failure? What if we
accepted and took risks? What if we

00:04:11.189 --> 00:04:14.636
were to break the cycle by
constructing smaller missions whose success is

00:04:14.669 --> 00:04:18.377
not to be guaranteed? Now, I'm not
trying to suggest we just build ha

00:04:18.410 --> 00:04:21.437
hazardous missions that are prone to
failure or that every mission should

00:04:21.470 --> 00:04:24.226
have risk. There are of course some
missions where we should go for a

00:04:24.259 --> 00:04:28.705
higher cost to guarantee a lower risk,
especially when humans, astronauts

00:04:28.738 --> 00:04:32.955
are involved. But there's some cases
where it is reasonable to take some

00:04:32.988 --> 00:04:36.976
risk. Imagine you are a planetary
scientist who is studying the circles of

00:04:37.009 --> 00:04:41.036
Mars because you just love the rocks
and the circles of Mars and that's ok.

00:04:41.069 --> 00:04:46.645
There's people like that. Well,
traditionally, you will build one very

00:04:46.678 --> 00:04:49.986
expensive state of the art, beautiful
robber that will go all the way to

00:04:50.019 --> 00:04:53.387
Mars and perform wonderful science for
you. But what if for the same

00:04:53.420 --> 00:04:57.007
amount of money you were to go to.
Now, this is not like an information

00:04:57.040 --> 00:04:59.606
with some black magic. So obviously,
you will need to cut corners

00:04:59.639 --> 00:05:02.606
somewhere and the system may be more
prompt to failure somewhere leading

00:05:02.639 --> 00:05:06.717
to say a 75% chance of success. For
each role, you still send the ball to

00:05:06.750 --> 00:05:11.377
Mars and yes, one might fail, but you
still got the other one. Maybe both

00:05:11.410 --> 00:05:15.656
fail, then you're out of luck. But
what if the most likely scenario occurs

00:05:15.689 --> 00:05:18.776
and both can succeed? Then we have
just performed double the amount of

00:05:18.809 --> 00:05:22.317
science without a single 10 a
increases in price, we can do more with less

00:05:22.350 --> 00:05:26.007
if we accept some risk. This is
specifically what we were doing with CUB

00:05:26.040 --> 00:05:30.656
sets. Some engineers, a couple in 1999
they came together and disagreed

00:05:30.689 --> 00:05:34.406
upon building very, very small
satellites in the same form factor. They

00:05:34.439 --> 00:05:37.666
introduced what we know today as a cub
set standard and Cub sets come in

00:05:37.699 --> 00:05:42.166
various sizes. A one U tube set is a
10 by 10 by 10 centimeter blocks

00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:46.736
about the size of a tissue box. A two
U is a 10 by 10 by 20 centimeter box

00:05:46.769 --> 00:05:50.387
and a three U is a 10 by 10 by 30
centimeter box just about the size of a

00:05:50.420 --> 00:05:55.776
loaf of bread. Here, I have a model of
a three unit Gibson. This is the

00:05:55.809 --> 00:05:59.476
actual size of the spacecraft, but
just because you're born a box doesn't

00:05:59.509 --> 00:06:04.697
mean you have to die a box. You can
expand and deploy solar panels. These

00:06:04.730 --> 00:06:08.906
satellites are remarkably small,
especially when you consider the fact

00:06:08.939 --> 00:06:12.887
that when we normally talk about
satellites, we talk in terms of cars and

00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:17.086
school buses, not loads of red tissue
boxes. Satellites are not normally

00:06:17.119 --> 00:06:21.286
something you call on stage while
talking. So even though these satellites

00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:25.346
are so small, we can fit a lot of
useful electronics into them. This is

00:06:25.379 --> 00:06:28.495
thanks to the fact that people want a
smaller computer in a smaller iphone

00:06:28.528 --> 00:06:33.555
every single year. The
commercialization, the militarization of consumer

00:06:33.588 --> 00:06:37.217
electronics have left us with very,
very powerful computers on very very

00:06:37.250 --> 00:06:42.377
small packages. So why not take the
computer in your cellphone

00:06:42.410 --> 00:06:45.296
and put it in a satellite? This is the
point where a traditional aerospace

00:06:45.329 --> 00:06:49.055
engineer would say stop right there.
This is not gonna work, but I'm not a

00:06:49.088 --> 00:06:53.796
traditional aerospace engineer. I can
guarantee to you that utilizing this

00:06:53.829 --> 00:06:58.395
iphone electronics in your satellite
is much, much, much less expensive

00:06:58.428 --> 00:07:02.325
than utilizing the redundant radiation
hard and customized electronics of

00:07:02.358 --> 00:07:05.846
normal satellites. There's some risk
to utilize these electronics because

00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:09.217
they're more prone to fill in space.
But this allows us to build space

00:07:09.250 --> 00:07:14.145
guard for a really low price and break
the cycle. So I have built my space

00:07:14.178 --> 00:07:17.645
, my little cub and I'm ready to send
it to space. What do I do? Well, I

00:07:17.678 --> 00:07:20.705
approach a lunch provider and say,
hey, lunch provider send this to space

00:07:20.738 --> 00:07:23.717
for me. The lunch provider will say,
ok, I'll send this to space for you.

00:07:23.750 --> 00:07:28.495
 Just give me 100 and $65 million

00:07:28.528 --> 00:07:33.586
as an undergrad student. We felt a
little bit out of my budget. So what do

00:07:33.619 --> 00:07:38.817
I do? I wait for another customer with
more money to get a lunch and I

00:07:38.850 --> 00:07:41.555
don't have to wait long because after
all lunches happen every two weeks,

00:07:41.588 --> 00:07:46.046
right? So then I just grab my little
tips up and I strap it next to the

00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:50.096
rocket engine belt or whatever I can
make it fit. I ask him for permission.

00:07:50.129 --> 00:07:52.995
 First, of course,

00:07:53.028 --> 00:07:56.825
for the rocket at 3 kg increment in
mass due to the kids. That makes

00:07:56.858 --> 00:08:00.495
absolutely no difference since it may
already be carrying a five ton

00:08:00.528 --> 00:08:04.106
satellite, the size of school. We are
literally hitchhiking the way into

00:08:04.139 --> 00:08:08.156
space as secondary pillars and we're
just charging conveniently for it.

00:08:08.189 --> 00:08:12.976
This fee may be in the order of a
couple of $100,000 and I know it's still

00:08:13.009 --> 00:08:15.656
expensive. It's not to the point where
everybody is gonna go tonight,

00:08:15.689 --> 00:08:18.776
build their kids and send it to space
tomorrow. But this is a very

00:08:18.809 --> 00:08:22.406
significant reduction in price. One
that opens the doors of the previously

00:08:22.439 --> 00:08:27.236
British Love Space Club. Two more
players,

00:08:27.269 --> 00:08:31.705
I'm talking about high risk science
with the possibility of a high reward.

00:08:31.738 --> 00:08:35.066
Now, imagine you are a lunar scientist
who's studying the moon because

00:08:35.099 --> 00:08:38.135
you just love the rocks on the surface
of the moon. And that's ok. There's

00:08:38.168 --> 00:08:42.895
people like that too. Well, we have
orbiters right now orbiting the moon

00:08:42.928 --> 00:08:45.366
just like this. This is the moon, this
is the orbiter. They're doing,

00:08:45.399 --> 00:08:49.047
they're doing fine science, really
cool stuff. But if we were able to

00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:52.956
orbit the moon really, really close to
it on a really low altitude orbit,

00:08:52.989 --> 00:08:57.275
we will be able to make some very
astonishing measurements. But it doesn't

00:08:57.308 --> 00:09:01.167
matter how much you love the moon and
its rocks. No scientist or engineer

00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:03.816
in their right mind is going to risk
the spacecraft. It is such a low

00:09:03.849 --> 00:09:11.177
orbit because it might crash into the
moon and that's bad. But what if you

00:09:11.210 --> 00:09:14.726
were using a cub set? Let's send it on
to a 10, a five kilometer of it. I

00:09:14.759 --> 00:09:19.657
don't care. We have 10 or 20 more
around the moon at the same time. This

00:09:19.690 --> 00:09:23.177
aspect of cub that has been utilized
by a company called Planet Planet is

00:09:23.210 --> 00:09:27.047
an earth imaging company founded in
2010 with one mission and one mission

00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:31.145
only. They want to image the whole
earth every single day and they're

00:09:31.178 --> 00:09:34.346
doing it. And the resulting images are
not only beautiful but they're

00:09:34.379 --> 00:09:39.287
highly valuable for agriculture, space
and defense and, and mapping. As a

00:09:39.320 --> 00:09:42.066
result, they're making a good back out
of selling these images. They have

00:09:42.099 --> 00:09:45.797
transitioned from being headquartered
in a garage. Seven years ago to

00:09:45.830 --> 00:09:49.557
being a single entity with the most
satellites are on our planet right now.

00:09:49.590 --> 00:09:52.547
They have hundreds of three unit tubes
that just like that one over here

00:09:52.580 --> 00:09:56.936
on planet and they have hundreds more
waiting for lunch. They recently

00:09:56.969 --> 00:10:00.807
deployed at the record in 88 from a
single launch. And yes, the

00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:03.576
individuals had the spell at the time,
but when you have hundreds more

00:10:03.609 --> 00:10:07.446
waiting for lunch and how to do
tomorrow. One of it, it doesn't matter.

00:10:07.479 --> 00:10:10.717
Now, I have to admit to you, I have
said a lot of good things about

00:10:10.750 --> 00:10:14.576
satellites but about tips. That's
specific, but they're not the solution

00:10:14.609 --> 00:10:19.015
to every problem out there. We still
need big space missions because we

00:10:19.048 --> 00:10:22.917
cannot have uh we cannot share the
Hubble space telescope um into the size

00:10:22.950 --> 00:10:27.196
of a break with current technology.
But cub sets are very useful for very

00:10:27.229 --> 00:10:31.635
specific. So solving very specific
problems. For example, scientists in

00:10:31.668 --> 00:10:34.787
the city of Phoenix are trying to
understand how the composition and the

00:10:34.820 --> 00:10:40.135
structure of our cities affects the
urban heat islands, human materials,

00:10:40.168 --> 00:10:43.496
materials like concrete and asphalt.
They tend to retain the heat of the

00:10:43.529 --> 00:10:47.265
sun longer and far more than the
surrounding natural materials like grass

00:10:47.298 --> 00:10:51.895
, dirt and cactus. As a result, the
air temperature and the surface

00:10:51.928 --> 00:10:56.797
temperature of the cities is
increased. This this is not good because

00:10:56.830 --> 00:11:00.177
Phoenix is already hot enough. So

00:11:00.210 --> 00:11:03.446
um this is a very valid scientific
investigation. One to which many

00:11:03.479 --> 00:11:07.217
scientists dedicated their whole lives
about study. But for some reason or

00:11:07.250 --> 00:11:10.177
another, this may not attract
sufficient attention to single handedly

00:11:10.210 --> 00:11:14.076
justify the construction of a large
serving mission, but it can justify A

00:11:14.109 --> 00:11:17.787
Q. And that is specifically what I'm
working on right now together with a

00:11:17.820 --> 00:11:20.996
team of around 60 other undergraduate
students at Arizona State University.

00:11:21.029 --> 00:11:24.486
I'm building such ac that we have
named Phoenix. Phoenix will go to space

00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:28.645
carry a thermal camera and images from
over there. We wrote a proposal to

00:11:28.678 --> 00:11:34.025
NASA two years ago and received
$200,000 to build this mission. That may

00:11:34.058 --> 00:11:38.145
seem like a large amount of money
because it is, but it is a very change

00:11:38.178 --> 00:11:42.846
compared to any other mission out
there. That is not a keep set cub sets

00:11:42.879 --> 00:11:46.336
like Phoenix allows us to train the
scientists and engineers of the future.

00:11:46.369 --> 00:11:49.395
It allows us to like us not just to
learn how to design a spacecraft on

00:11:49.428 --> 00:11:52.385
paper, but to actually build a real
spacecraft that we will go into real

00:11:52.418 --> 00:11:56.446
space. The same were at as well.

00:11:56.479 --> 00:12:00.907
This is huge because it doesn't matter
how much we as a species as a

00:12:00.940 --> 00:12:04.196
society value education. Nobody is
currently writing checks for

00:12:04.229 --> 00:12:07.486
undergraduate students like me to go
build satellites, but they're doing

00:12:07.519 --> 00:12:09.967
so. For Q sets

00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:13.116
in Phoenix or Qet, it's much more than
use A Q set. It is an

00:12:13.149 --> 00:12:15.875
interdisciplinary effort with students
from the school of journalism

00:12:15.908 --> 00:12:19.385
design in the arts, sustainability
engineering. All of us getting valuable

00:12:19.418 --> 00:12:22.765
, getting valuable experience that
will make us better in the respective

00:12:22.798 --> 00:12:26.557
fields. All of us working in unison
towards our single common goal. We aim

00:12:26.590 --> 00:12:30.356
to promote the importance of climate
science. We aim to promote in terms

00:12:30.389 --> 00:12:33.525
of the importance of climate science
and produce meaningful scientific

00:12:33.558 --> 00:12:36.875
information and share with anybody
anywhere so they can do meaningful

00:12:36.908 --> 00:12:40.297
scientific analysis if they sell this
high. I and the rest of my team has

00:12:40.330 --> 00:12:43.816
spent countless hours working on this
mission. It is proof that our work

00:12:43.849 --> 00:12:46.976
can have a meaningful impact on the
world. And I love this. It's stick to

00:12:47.009 --> 00:12:51.428
something as a small as a lo of red.
Thank you.