differences in stress responses. When a given individual does experience stress, it involves both an emotional experience and a specific stress response. These two processes are not as easily separable as the model would suggest. The distinction is made, however, to emphasize the differences between the subjective experience of stress and its more objectively quantifiable physiological and psychological effects. The next stages of the model involve cognitive and behavioral attempts to cope with the stressor. If such responses are successful, the event is reevaluated as non-stressful and further coping behaviors are unnecessary. This benign reappraisal may be the result of cognitive restructuring or an objective change in the environment caused by an overt behavioral coping response. If reappraisal processes still indicate an imbalance, the individual continues to experience stress and continues to make attempts at coping. The overall form of the model is a continuous loop, and this form is important in that it emphasizes the interaction between individual and environment. This process is even clearer in the simplified transactional model provided by McGrath (1976). This model is shown in Figure 2 below. Outcome Process A. Situation I 7 Process \ lntraorganism Figure 2. A simplified transactional model (McGrath, 1976). 9 ENVIRONMENT INDICTOR Traflk Sins INDICTOR KEYB ACCX ACCY E L ACCZ II SYSTEMS RELATED FUNCTIONS Brclk SlWA lnolc-rom EDR HR EMQ Figure 4. A model of driver, vehicle, and road system interactionsin the driving siluation (Helander, 1975). Perceptual complexity, the driver's interpretation of environmental complexity, describes the total influence of the environment on the driver. The level of perceptual complexity determines the activation level of the driver. Activation level can be measured through physiological correlates such as heart rate and galvanic skin response. Activation level, in turn, affects performance in terms of vehicle control operations, which affect the external environmental situation. Neither of these two models directly deals with the idea of driving stress, but it is apparent at what point such a concept would enter each scheme. In Getalter's model, the perceived situation is compared with perceived coping possibilities to arrive at a subjective confidence level. If the perceived situational demand exceeded coping abilities at this comparison point, stress would result. In Helander's model, perceptions of environmental complexity influence the driver's activation level. A high activation level is a necessary prerequisite for the experience of stress. accident group also exhibited a higher rate of psychopathology, including alcoholism, paranoia, depression, and suicidal thoughts, than the control group. If the alcoholics in the fatality group are excluded from the analysis, rates . of psychopathology do not differ between the two groups, but those drivers in the fatality group still reported significantly more life stresses than the controls ( 4 2 % v s . 18%). A slightly different sort of investigation was conducted by McMurray (1970). Accident and violation rates of individuals involved in divorce proceedings were compared to average population levels. Subjects were grouped into four categories (male plaintiff, female plaintiff, male defendant, and female defendant) for analysis. During the seven year . period covered by the driving record, the accident rates for those people involved in divorce proceedings were from 43 to 8 2 % higher than the average rates. Violation rates were 7 8 % to 195% higher. Similar results were found for the one year period associated with filing the divorce petition (from six months before to six months after the filing of the document). For all four of the groups studied, the period of greatest accident and violation activity was the first three months after filing the divorce petition (see Figure 6, below). v I I I I I 68 38 Months before 1618 12-16 9-12 The types of violations for which the I 0-3 I ' 0-3 Time of filing I 3-6 I I I 6-8 9-12 12-16 16-18 Months after Figure 6. Percentage of drivers involved in accidents and violations before and after filing for divorce (McMurray, 1970). divorce group were cited differed from the average types of violations in the population. Fewer serious violations (those requiring mandatory license suspensions) were found in the divorce group, but minor violations involving speeding, failure to yield, and failure to stop occurred more frequently in the divorce group than in the population at large. These studies do suggest that driving stress, as evidenced by accident and violation rates, is greater in individuals who have experienced recent significant life stresses than in those who have not. One group of drivers in which this relationship may prove to be particularly strong is the elderly driving population. DRIVING STRESS AND THE ELDERLY The driving population of the United States is aging. 11.3% of the population was over 65 years of age. In 1988, only This group is expected to increase to 16.9% by the year 2000, and by 2030, over 20% of the population will be over 65 (U.S. DOC., 1981, 1984). Figure 7, below, shows these changes graphically. The number of licensed drivers within the AGE Figure 7. Age d i i t f h t h of the U.S. population, 1950-2030 (Transportation Research Board, 1988). The number of driver fatalities per million licensed drivers evidences a similar increasing trend (Figure lo), Driver fatalities per million licensed driven 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Driver age, yean 80 90 100 Figure 10. Driver fatalities per million million licensed drivers, 1983 (Evans, 1988). as does the number of driver fatalities per unit distance of travel (Figure 11). , famlitbsper unit distance d travel, ~ m ' ' 1 F i n 11. Driver fatalities per terameter (1 Tm = 621 million miles) of travel, 1983 (Evans, 1988). Evans suggests that the increases in driver fatalities may, in fact, be due to the fact that a crash of given serverity is more likely to prove fatal 14 CN - Ri MAGNITUDE PER MIN. h9 U.S. 1 MAGNITUDE PER MIN. I TURNPIKE A mu B C D E F G H I A V G . TEST DRIVERS Figure 15. Mean tension generated on the Maine Turnpike and US 1 for each test triver (Michaels, 1965). Taylor (1964) conducted a study that compared percentage change in GSR as drivers traversed a 21 mile route that contained 40 homogenous sections of different road conditions, including winding country roads, urban streets, and an expressway. The GSR rate, in nominal response units per minute, was, for the most part, quite stable across the different road sections. Some significant relationships, such as higher GSR rates for road sections containing road junctions than for immediately adjacent sections, were identified, but a constant GSR rate was maintained throughout most conditions. The researcher explains this by postulating that GSR may function as a pacing mechanism. A driver may have a certain level of tension that he or she is willing to tolerate. If road conditions impose a greater or lesser amount of tension, the driver will adjust speed accordingly. C a t e m Leveb. Berger, Bliersbach, and Dellen (1976) report that levels of catecholanines indicate that greater stress was experienced on city roads than on highways. Road D e s m Element& Certain road elements have been shown to have a direct relationship to physiological indicators of stress. For example, Babkov (1975) reports