GREATER PHOENIX BLUE CHIP • OCTOBER 2000 VOLUME 12 • NUMBER 4 • OCTOBER 2000 ........................................................................................... PAGE 1 ™ B L U E • C H I P • E C O N O M I C • F O R E C A S T ......................................................................................................................................................... Real estate market outperforms forecasts for 2000 The Greater Phoenix real estate market continues to do well and the single-family housing market remains strong. The forecast for single-family permits for 2000 now exceeds 32,000 units, up from a forecast of 31,000 in May of 2000. For next year, the forecast now exceeds 29,000 units; 27,000 units are anticipated for 2002. This decline is modest by historic standards and is reective of expected continued growth in the economy. The outlook for multi-family housing remains positive as well. More than 7,700 permits are anticipated this year, while close to 7,000 are anticipated for next year and 6,500 for 2002. Apartment vacancy rates are expected to increase only modestly over the next few years as permitting slows and absorption remains stable. The office market outlook remains sanguine as well. More than 3.0 million square feet are expected to be built this year, with a slowdown in construction to 2.3 million square feet next year and 2.0 million in 2002. The good news for the office market has been the very strong absorption levels. The panel expects absorption to approach 3.0 million square feet this year and slow to about 2.1 million next year and 1.9 million in 2002. The net result is that vacancy rates are expected to remain relatively stable, in the 11.5 to 12.0 percent range. Because of the strong absorption, the ofce market apparently is not going to be overbuilt anytime soon. Retail is stable as well. More than 2.2 million square feet will be built this year, slightly above the level that is expected to be absorbed. Construction should increase to about 2.8 million square feet next year and decrease to 2.2 million square feet in 2002. Vacancy rates are expected to be in the 8.0 to 8.5 percent range. The industrial market also remains strong. Nearly 6.9 million square feet of total space is anticipated for this year, while another 6.0 million is expected to be built in 2001 and 5.0 million in 2002. Vacancy rates are expected to remain stable as absorption stays in line with construction. Overall, the market remains in good shape. While a slowdown in construction is expected in all areas except the retail market, absorption is anticipated to match pace with construction and, by historic standards, the slowdown is expected to be very modest. In the absence of the passage of Proposition 202, the economic outlook is also sanguine, which is a necessary condition for the real estate market to stay as stable as it has been. Fears of any signicant overbuilding appear to be unfounded at the present time. – E.P. Greater Phoenix economic outlook remains positive We asked the Blue Chip panel to take a rst look at 2002 and to update its forecast for 2000 and 2001. Those panelists willing to give us a rst look at 2002 foresee an economy still growing at a good pace, but at a slower rate than in 2000 or 2001. The panel so far has been conservative in its forecasts during the current expansion, so another good year is likely. The actual performance of the economy so far this year is better than the forecast in the case of retail sales, wage and salary employment, construction employment, services employment and the unemployment rate. However, the panel has been too optimistic concerning manufacturing employment and the national CPI. The below-expected growth in manufacturing employment may reect tight labor markets, the lingering impact of the Asian nancial crisis or the fact that new rms are not immediately reected in the survey estimates. The consensus agrees exactly with the estimate of population growth produced here at ASU, but its actual relation to the census remains to be seen. The most recent data available for 2000 at press time was through August for all indicators except personal income, where the last actual data point is 1998. Good economic performance will continue as long as consumers are willing to spend — and they have been, in large part because of the unusually tight labor markets. Announcements of layoffs in both the old and new economies have not caused much concern because of the perception that other jobs will not be difcult to nd. However, consumer optimism may begin to reflect the problematic performance of the stock market, rising energy costs and the attempts by the Federal Reserve to slow the national economy. — T.C. CONSENSUS FORECAST FOR 2002 Annual Percent Change from 2001 Population................................... Personal Income......................... Retail Sales ................................ Wage & Salary Employment....... Manufacturing Employment........ Construction Employment .......... Service Employment................... National CPI ............................... Unemployment Rate................... 2.7 6.5 6.2 3.2 1.5 (3.0) 4.9 2.5 3.5 BANK ONE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK CENTER • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PAGE 2 ........................................................................................... GREATER PHOENIX BLUE CHIP • OCTOBER 2000 GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC FORECAST FOR 2000 ANNUAL PERCENT CHANGE 2000 FROM 1999 SOURCE Arizona Public Service ASU – Bank One Economic Outlook Center Communities Southwest Department of Economic Security ECON-LINC Elliott D. Pollack and Co. H. C. Reardon Economics Joint Legislative Budget Committee Lancaster Consulting The Maguire Company Salt River Project U of A – Eller College VisionEcon 1998 Consensus Population 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 3.0 3.1H 3.1H 2.6L 2.9 Personal Income 8.1 7.0 6.8 8.2 6.8 7.3 8.0 6.7 6.2L 6.8 6.8 8.3H 6.7 7.1 Retail Sales 7.8 9.5 6.5 7.0 6.5 8.0 7.5 7.8 5.8L 6.1 6.8 10.1H 7.6 7.4 Wage & Salary Empl. 4.5 4.0 3.9 4.2 4.0 4.2 3.8 3.8 3.5 4.0 4.4 4.6H 3.1L 4.0 Manufacturing Empl. 0.8 1.0 2.1 2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.7 2.0 0.5L 2.8H 1.9 1.7 AVERAGE RATE FOR 2000 Construction Empl. 3.1 3.0 2.6 4.0H 0.0 1.0 4.0H (2.0)L 0.0 1.0 2.8 3.6 2.0 1.8 Services Empl. 5.9 6.3 5.2 6.4 5.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 4.6L 4.6L 37.0H 5.8 5.5 5.7 National CPI 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.3H 2.5 2.3L 3.2 3.3H 2.5 2.8 Unemployment Rate 2.8 2.6L 3.0 — 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.7H 3.5 3.3 2.8 — 3.5 3.2 GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC FORECAST FOR 2001 ANNUAL PERCENT CHANGE 2001 FROM 2000 SOURCE Arizona Public Service ASU – Economic Outlook Center Communities Southwest Department of Economic Security ECON-LINC Elliott D. Pollack and Co. H. C. Reardon Economics Joint Legislative Budget Committee Lancaster Consulting The Maguire Company Salt River Project U of A – BPA College VisionEcon 1999 Consensus Population 2.9H 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9H 2.9H 2.7 2.9H 2.9H 2.9H 2.6 2.8 Personal Income 6.8 6.0L 6.0L 7.5H 6.4 7.0 7.0 6.1 6.0L 6.6 6.4 7.4 6.0L 6.5 Retail Sales 6.0 4.3 5.2 6.2 5.6 6.0 6.0 6.5 5.5 5.6 6.0 3.6L 7.9H 5.7 Wage & Salary Empl. 3.5 2.9 3.2 4.0H 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.2 3.6 4.0H 3.4 2.6L 3.4 Manufacturing Empl. 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.4H 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.0 1.7 (0.5)L 1.4 AVERAGE RATE FOR 2001 Construction Empl. (2.5) (4.0) (4.5) 2.3H (8.0) (10.0)L (5.0) (5.0) (5.0) 0.0 0.0 (2.9) 1.0 (3.4) Services Empl. 4.0L 5.0 4.1 5.7 4.4 5.5 5.5 4.8 4.5 4.2 6.0H 4.8 4.9 5.0 National CPI 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.0H 2.4 2.3L 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.6 Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.3 3.4 — 3.7 3.0L 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.1 — 4.0H 3.5 Data sources for Maricopa County (Greater Phoenix area): population, Arizona Department of Economic Security; personal income, Bureau of Economic Analysis; retail sales, Arizona Department of Revenue; wage and salary employment, manufacturing employment, construction employment, service employment and unemployment rate, GREATER PHOENIX HISTORICAL DATA SOURCE 1999 Percent Change 1998 Percent Change 1997 Percent Change *Estimated Population (thousands) 2,882 3.1 2,794 3.3 2,706 3.2 Personal Income (millions) 81,711* 7.7* 75,869 9.7 69,172 10.1 Retail Sales (millions) 27,825 10.4 25,207 7.9 23,360 7.8 Wage & Salary Empl. (thousands) 1,487.2 4.8 1,418.8 5.5 1,344.2 5.6 Manufacturing Empl. (thousands) 161.8 -2.9 166.7 5.2 158.5 4.5 Construction Empl. (thousands) 112.3 7.6 104.4 11.8 93.4 5.5 Services Empl. (thousands) 486.2 9.0 446.2 5.2 424.0 7.3 National CPI 166.6 2.2 163.0 1.6 160.5 2.3 Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.6 3.0 GREATER PHOENIX BLUE CHIP • OCTOBER 2000 ........................................................................................... PAGE 3 METROPOLITAN PHOENIX REAL ESTATE CONSENSUS FORECAST RESIDENTIAL 2000 Arizona Public Service ASU Real Estate Center CB Richard Ellis Communities Southwest Elliott D. Pollack & Co. Grifn Consulting Marcus & Millichap PricewaterhouseCoopers U of A, Eller College Consensus 1999 Actual 1998 Actual 2001 2002 Singlefamily Permits Multifamily Permits Year-end Apt. Vacancy Apt. Absorption Singlefamily Permits Multifamily Permits Year-end Apt. Vacancy Apt. Absorption Singlefamily Permits Multifamily Permits 35,650 31,000 34,000 30,500 32,000 28,500 34,700 32,000 32,200 32,283 33,262 33,811 7,850 7,500 8,800 6,250 8,000 6,300 8,600 8,000 8,250 7,728 7,759 7,877 6.6% 7.5 6.0 7.3 7.0 7.2 7.1 7.0 — 7.0% 5.9 5.1 5,200 5,500 7,500 4,800 4,500 5,400 7,500 6,800 — 5,900 5,017 3,674 33,000 29,000 32,000 28,000 30,000 27,000 32,000 28,000 23,650 29,183 6,500 7.1% 4,500 31,000 5,500 8,000 8.5 6,000 26,500 7,500 8,100 6.2 8,100 28,000 8,000 5,750 7.6 4,200 26,900 5,500 6,500 7.5 6,000 27,000 6,000 6,100 7.3 5,000 26,000 6,400 8,100 7.4 7,200 30,000 7,700 7,300 8.0 5,700 27,000 7,000 5,800 — — 21,500 5,400 6,906 7.5% 5,838 27,100 6,556 1999 year-end inventory: 765,732 (single-family) 296,761 (multi-family) Year-end Apt. Apt. AbsorpVacancy tion 7.4% 8.0 6.3 7.9 7.5 7.5 7.6 8.5 — 7.6% 4,200 6,250 7,000 4,000 6,000 5,550 7,000 5,500 — 5,688 METROPOLITAN PHOENIX REAL ESTATE CONSENSUS FORECAST OFFICE (Millions of Square Feet) Construction 2000 2001 2002 Leaseable Year-end Vacancy Leaseable Year-end Vacancy Leaseable Year-end Vacancy Absorption Construction Absorption Construction Absorption Arizona Public Service CB Richard Ellis Communities Southwest Elliott D. Pollack & Co. Grubb & Ellis Lee & Associates Marcus & Millichap PricewaterhouseCoopers 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.5 3.9 3.0 11.5% 10.0 12.4 11.5 11.7 11.7 10.4 13.0 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.8 2.7 1.8 4.5 2.8 1.8 2.5 2.7 2.5 3.0 1.9 2.6 1.2 12.7% 9.0 12.7 11.5 11.9 11.1 10.1 13.0 1.0 3.0 2.1 2.5 2.6 1.8 3.0 1.2 1.2 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.9 — — 1.5 12.8% 10.4 12.9 11.3 12.1 — — 14.0 1.0 2.5 1.7 2.2 2.5 — — 1.3 Consensus 1999 1998 3.1 4.0 1.8 11.5 11.4 9.3 2.9 1.8 1.6 2.3 11.5 2.2 1.9 12.3 1.9 1999 year-end inventory: 46.2 million square feet METROPOLITAN PHOENIX REAL ESTATE CONSENSUS FORECAST RETAIL (Millions of Square Feet) Construction Arizona Public Service CB Richard Ellis Communities Southwest Grubb & Ellis Marcus & Millichap PricewaterhouseCoopers Consensus 1999 1998 1.6 2.0 2.4 3.5 2.1 1.8 2.2 3.5 1.0 2000 2001 2002 Leaseable Year-end Vacancy Leaseable Year-end Vacancy Leaseable Year-end Vacancy 9.4% 6.0 9.4 6.0 8.5 9.5 8.1 10.0 9.1 Absorption Construction 2.0 1.8 1.8 3.4 2.0 1.6 2.1 2.3 1.3 3.0 3.0 2.1 4.5 2.7 1.3 2.8 9.7% 6.5 9.6 6.3 9.0 10.0 8.5 Absorption Construction 2.5 2.7 1.5 4.1 2.1 1.0 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 3.5 — 1.8 2.2 10.1% 6.5 10.1 6.5 — 10.0 8.3 1999 year-end inventory: 88.0 million square feet Absorption 1.4 1.6 1.4 3.3 — 1.5 1.8 PAGE 4 ........................................................................................... GREATER PHOENIX BLUE CHIP • OCTOBER 2000 METROPOLITAN PHOENIX REAL ESTATE CONSENSUS FORECAST INDUSTRIAL (Millions of Square Feet) 2000 2001 Leaseable Year-end Vacancy 6.3% 7.5 6.5 6.8 CB Richard Ellis* Lee & Associates* Grubb & Ellis** Consensus–Total Space Construction 7.5 7.3 5.8 6.9 Grubb & Ellis*** Consensus–Spec Space 4.0 4.0 12.5 12.5 3.8 3.8 1999 Actual (Total space) 1998 Actual (Total space) 9.5 7.0 8.1 7.1 7.0 8.0 *All space over 5,000 sq. ft. Absorption 9.5 6.8 5.2 7.2 Construction 6.5 5.5 5.0 5.7 3.5 3.5 Leaseable Year-end Vacancy 6.5% 7.9 6.8 7.1 2002 Absorption 8.0 6.4 4.4 6.3 Construction 6.0 5.0 3.5 4.8 3.4 3.4 2.0 2.0 12.8 12.8 Leaseable Year-end Vacancy 6.0% 7.6 7.0 6.9 Absorption 6.5 6.5 3.1 5.4 13.0 13.0 1.9 1.9 1999 year-end inventory: 189.8 million sq. ft. (CB Richard Ellis)* 196.2 million sq. ft. (Lee & Associates)* 215.0 million sq. ft. (Grubb & Ellis)** 91.9 million sq. ft. spec (Grubb & Ellis)*** **Total Market (Space over 10,000 sq.ft) ***Spec space over 10,000 sq. ft., including single- or multi-tenant buildings REAL ESTATE FORECAST Arizona Real Estate Center Arizona State University Jay Q. Butler Arizona Public Service Brian Cary and Pete Ewen The University of Arizona, Eller College of Business and Public Administration Marshall Vest CB Richard Ellis Jeff Cooledge Grifn Consulting Brian J. Smargiassi Communities Southwest Steven Pritulsky Grubb & Ellis George Gramm PricewaterhouseCoopers Tom Kabat Lee & Associates Arizona T. J. Swearengin Elliott D. Pollack and Company Elliott Pollack Marcus & Millichap Tim Rios or Dave Wetta ECONOMIC FORECAST PANEL Arizona Department of Economic Security Dan Anderson and Donald Wehbey ECON-LINC John Lucking Arizona Public Service Company Pete Ewen H. C. Reardon Economics Hank Reardon Arizona State University, Bank One Economic Outlook Center Tracy Clark Joint Legislative Budget Committee Kent Ennis Communities Southwest Steve Pritulsky Bank One Economic Outlook Center Tracy L. Clark, Economics Editor Elliott Pollack, Topics Editor Nancy A. Maneely, Editorial Coordinator Laura Carr, Graphic Designer Salt River Project Christopher Combe, Melissa Hardison and Karen Wolfe The University of Arizona, Eller College of Business and Public Administration Marshall Vest The Maguire Company Alan Maguire Elliott D. Pollack and Company Elliott Pollack GREATER PHOENIX BLUE CHIP (ISSN 1042-6825) is published four times a year by the Bank One Economic Outlook Center, an afliate of the L. William Seidman Research Institute in the College of Business at Arizona State University. The annual rate is $39. For information, call the Bank One Economic Outlook Center at (480) 965–5543. Arizona State University vigorously pursues afrmative action and equal opportunity in its employment, activities and programs. • Not Printed or Mailed at State Expense • Lancaster Consulting Dwight Duncan Vision Econ Debra J. Roubik www.phoenixchamber.com Mary Pahissa Upchurch, Chairman Valerie Manning, President/CEO