1 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested Mathematics Grade 3 2007 10 18 53 19 72 43 99 81,651 2008 10 19 49 22 71 55 99 83,629 2007 9 18 55 19 74 43 99 39,838 2008 9 19 51 21 72 55 99 40,742 2007 11 18 51 20 71 43 99 41,813 2008 11 18 48 22 70 55 99 42,887 2007 16 23 51 11 62 43 98 4,557 2008 17 23 48 12 60 55 98 4,697 2007 3 10 48 38 86 43 99 2,293 2008 4 10 44 42 86 55 99 2,458 2007 14 24 53 10 63 43 99 35,495 2008 14 24 50 12 62 55 99 36,452 2007 17 29 48 7 55 43 98 4,095 2008 18 30 45 8 53 55 98 4,471 2007 5 11 54 30 84 43 99 35,211 2008 5 12 50 33 83 55 99 35,551 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 14 24 52 10 62 43 99 41,922 2008 15 25 49 12 61 55 99 45,277 Students with Disabilities 2007 27 26 38 8 46 43 96 10,620 2008 30 28 33 9 42 55 98 10,957 Limited English Proficient 2007 22 33 41 3 44 43 99 15,039 2008 22 33 42 4 46 55 100 15,455 2007 14 26 51 8 59 43 99 345 2008 13 36 44 7 51 55 100 205 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 1 Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American 69 53 98 81,350 69 63 99 83,634 2007 5 22 59 14 73 53 99 39,759 Number Tested 12 13 Percent Tested 57 56 Annual Objective 24 24 Percent Meets 7 8 Percent Approaches 2007 2008 Percent Falls Far Below Percent Pass All Students Year Subgroup Percent Exceeds Reading Grade 3 2008 6 22 58 15 73 63 99 40,743 2007 9 26 55 10 65 53 98 41,591 2008 10 26 53 11 64 63 99 42,891 2007 8 29 56 7 63 53 98 4,534 2008 10 28 54 8 62 63 98 4,698 2007 3 14 64 20 84 53 99 2,291 2008 3 14 58 24 82 63 99 2,458 2007 10 32 52 5 57 53 98 35,367 36,450 2008 11 32 52 6 58 63 99 2007 10 37 49 4 53 53 98 4,083 2008 11 37 48 3 51 63 98 4,471 2007 3 14 63 20 83 53 98 35,075 2008 4 14 60 21 81 63 99 35,557 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 10 33 52 5 57 53 98 41,754 2008 11 32 51 6 57 63 99 45,271 Students with Disabilities 2007 24 37 34 4 38 53 93 10,319 2008 29 37 30 4 34 63 98 10,956 Limited English Proficient 2007 19 48 32 1 33 53 98 14,964 2008 19 46 34 1 35 63 99 15,451 2007 10 38 50 3 53 53 99 344 2008 11 46 40 3 43 63 100 205 White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 2 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Writing Grade 3 2007 6 14 65 16 81 99 81,572 2008 6 18 66 10 76 99 83,519 2007 4 10 66 20 86 99 39,847 2008 4 13 70 14 84 99 40,718 2007 7 18 64 11 75 98 41,725 2008 8 23 62 6 68 99 42,801 2007 8 16 64 12 76 98 4,553 2008 8 21 63 8 71 98 4,685 2007 4 6 58 32 90 99 2,287 2008 4 9 65 22 87 99 2,453 2007 8 18 65 9 74 99 35,455 36,388 2008 8 22 64 6 70 99 2007 8 19 66 7 73 97 4,051 2008 9 24 62 5 67 98 4,459 2007 3 9 66 22 88 99 35,226 2008 4 13 68 14 82 99 35,534 2007 8 19 65 9 74 99 41,846 2008 8 23 63 6 69 99 45,191 2007 16 30 48 6 54 96 10,623 2008 22 33 42 3 45 98 10,929 2007 13 27 57 3 60 99 14,981 2008 13 30 55 2 57 99 15,403 2007 8 23 62 7 69 99 345 2008 8 21 66 4 70 100 205 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 3 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested Mathematics Grade 4 2007 11 16 46 27 73 54 99 81,016 2008 11 15 49 25 74 63 99 82,042 2007 10 16 48 26 74 54 99 39,458 2008 10 15 51 25 76 63 99 40,024 2007 12 15 45 28 73 54 99 41,558 2008 12 15 49 25 74 63 99 42,018 2007 18 20 45 17 62 54 98 4,371 2008 18 18 49 15 64 63 98 4,752 2007 4 7 38 50 88 54 99 2,237 2008 5 7 42 46 88 63 99 2,403 2007 15 21 48 16 64 54 99 35,213 2008 14 19 50 16 66 63 99 35,123 2007 19 25 45 11 56 54 98 3,962 2008 20 24 46 10 56 63 98 4,179 2007 5 9 46 40 86 54 99 35,233 2008 6 9 50 35 85 63 99 35,585 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 16 21 47 16 63 54 99 41,139 2008 16 20 50 15 65 63 99 43,063 Students with Disabilities 2007 33 24 32 11 43 54 95 10,757 2008 33 24 34 8 42 63 98 11,122 Limited English Proficient 2007 30 31 35 4 39 54 99 12,709 2008 27 29 40 4 44 63 100 13,001 2007 22 27 42 9 51 54 99 330 2008 15 23 48 13 61 63 98 234 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 4 Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested 2007 11 24 55 10 65 45 98 80,780 2008 9 21 60 9 69 56 99 82,061 2007 9 22 58 11 69 45 99 39,403 2008 7 20 63 10 73 56 99 40,032 2007 14 26 52 8 60 45 98 41,377 2008 12 22 57 8 65 56 99 42,029 2007 15 29 50 5 55 45 98 4,364 2008 13 25 57 5 62 56 98 4,754 2007 5 15 63 17 80 45 99 2,235 2008 4 13 67 15 82 56 99 2,401 2007 17 32 48 4 52 45 99 35,103 2008 13 28 54 4 58 56 99 35,126 2007 17 36 45 2 47 45 98 3,936 2008 15 34 48 2 50 56 98 4,182 2007 5 15 64 16 80 45 98 35,142 2008 5 12 67 16 83 56 99 35,598 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 17 32 47 4 51 45 98 40,990 2008 14 29 54 4 58 56 99 43,074 Students with Disabilities 2007 36 30 30 4 34 45 93 10,513 2008 34 31 32 3 35 56 98 11,129 Limited English Proficient 2007 34 45 20 0 20 45 98 12,621 2008 27 45 28 0 28 56 100 13,001 2007 26 35 38 1 39 45 98 328 2008 15 38 44 4 48 56 98 234 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Pass Reading Grade 4 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 5 Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Percent Pass 6 15 67 12 79 99 81,068 4 26 67 3 70 99 82,019 Number Tested 2007 2008 Percent Tested Percent Exceeds Percent Approaches Percent Meets All Students Year Subgroup Percent Falls Far Below Writing Grade 4 2007 4 11 69 16 85 99 39,514 2008 3 19 73 5 78 99 40,035 2007 8 20 65 8 73 99 41,554 2008 6 32 60 2 62 99 41,984 2007 8 19 65 8 73 98 4,385 2008 6 29 63 2 65 98 4,753 2007 3 7 65 26 91 99 2,241 2008 3 15 74 8 82 99 2,397 2007 8 20 66 6 72 99 35,239 2008 6 31 62 1 63 99 35,105 2007 7 21 67 4 71 98 3,973 2008 6 33 60 1 61 98 4,185 2007 3 10 69 18 87 99 35,230 2008 3 20 72 5 77 99 35,579 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 8 21 65 6 71 99 41,195 2008 6 32 60 1 61 99 43,061 Students with Disabilities 2007 18 34 44 4 48 96 10,819 2008 16 46 37 1 38 98 11,106 2007 17 34 49 1 50 99 12,705 12,979 Limited English Proficient Migrant 2008 11 45 44 0 44 99 2007 12 24 61 3 64 99 330 2008 5 30 64 0 64 99 236 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 6 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Percent Tested Number Tested Science Grade 4 All Students 2008 21 25 35 19 54 93 76,842 Female 2008 21 27 36 17 53 93 37,686 Male 2008 22 24 34 20 54 92 39,156 African American 2008 29 29 32 10 42 92 4,436 Asian 2008 11 18 38 32 70 95 2,292 Hispanic 2008 31 32 29 8 37 93 32,753 Native American 2008 37 33 25 5 30 90 3,848 White 2008 10 18 41 31 72 93 33,513 Economically Disadvantaged 2008 32 31 29 8 37 92 39,934 Students with Disabilities 2008 44 27 21 8 29 85 9,654 Limited English Proficient 2008 57 32 11 1 12 93 12,101 Migrant 2008 40 35 23 2 25 90 214 Subgroup This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 7 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested Mathematics Grade 5 2007 12 19 51 18 69 33 99 81,630 2008 13 18 50 20 70 47 99 81,580 2007 11 19 53 18 71 33 99 40,092 2008 11 19 51 19 70 47 99 39,705 2007 13 18 49 19 68 33 98 41,538 2008 14 17 48 21 69 47 99 41,875 2007 18 24 48 9 57 33 98 4,444 2008 21 22 47 11 58 47 98 4,642 2007 4 9 47 40 87 33 99 2,259 2008 6 9 43 43 86 47 99 2,316 2007 17 24 50 10 60 33 99 34,281 2008 17 24 49 11 60 47 99 34,940 2007 21 28 44 7 51 33 98 4,191 2008 23 26 44 7 51 47 98 4,084 2007 6 12 54 28 82 33 99 36,455 2008 6 12 52 30 82 47 99 35,598 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 18 25 49 9 58 33 99 40,247 2008 18 24 48 10 58 47 99 42,741 Students with Disabilities 2007 39 27 29 6 35 33 94 10,627 2008 41 26 28 5 33 47 98 11,001 Limited English Proficient 2007 38 34 27 2 29 33 98 10,180 2008 37 33 28 2 30 47 99 10,288 2007 24 24 46 6 52 33 98 335 2008 22 26 46 6 52 47 100 231 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 8 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested Reading Grade 5 2007 8 22 63 7 70 43 98 81,462 2008 9 22 60 8 68 55 99 81,602 2007 6 21 66 7 73 43 99 40,054 2008 7 21 63 9 72 55 99 39,715 2007 10 24 60 6 66 43 98 41,408 2008 12 24 57 8 65 55 99 41,887 2007 11 28 58 3 61 43 98 4,447 2008 14 26 56 4 60 55 98 4,641 2007 3 12 70 14 84 43 99 2,257 2008 5 13 65 17 82 55 99 2,315 2007 12 31 55 2 57 43 99 34,195 2008 14 30 53 4 57 55 99 34,943 2007 12 36 50 2 52 43 97 4,165 2008 16 35 47 2 49 55 98 4,085 2007 4 13 72 11 83 43 98 36,398 2008 4 14 68 14 82 55 99 35,618 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 13 31 54 2 56 43 98 40,148 2008 14 30 52 3 55 55 99 42,758 Students with Disabilities 2007 30 36 31 2 33 43 93 10,463 2008 35 34 28 2 30 55 98 11,010 Limited English Proficient 2007 31 49 20 0 20 43 98 10,130 2008 34 46 20 0 20 55 99 10,282 2007 15 38 47 1 48 43 98 335 2008 22 32 45 0 45 55 100 231 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 9 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Writing Grade 5 2007 4 28 64 4 68 99 81,681 2008 3 32 63 2 65 99 81,573 2007 2 21 71 6 77 99 40,184 2008 2 23 72 3 75 99 39,726 2007 6 35 57 3 60 98 41,497 2008 5 40 55 1 56 99 41,847 2007 5 32 60 4 64 98 4,450 2008 5 35 59 1 60 98 4,641 2007 2 15 72 11 83 99 2,261 2008 3 18 74 5 79 99 2,316 2007 6 33 59 2 61 99 34,311 34,932 2008 4 37 58 1 59 99 2007 5 38 56 2 58 98 4,200 2008 5 42 52 1 53 98 4,077 2007 2 22 69 6 75 99 36,459 2008 2 26 70 3 73 99 35,607 2007 6 35 57 2 59 99 40,281 2008 5 39 56 1 57 99 42,734 2007 15 51 32 1 33 95 10,710 2008 13 55 31 0 31 98 11,006 2007 15 51 34 0 34 99 10,201 2008 11 54 35 0 35 99 10,271 2007 8 39 50 3 53 99 337 2008 6 41 53 0 53 100 231 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 10 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Annual Objective Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Mathematics Grade 6 2007 18 17 46 19 65 43 98 80,383 2008 17 16 49 18 67 54 99 81,994 2007 16 17 48 20 68 43 99 39,379 2008 15 16 51 18 69 54 99 40,229 2007 20 16 44 19 63 43 98 41,004 41,765 2008 19 16 47 18 65 54 99 2007 27 20 43 10 53 43 98 4,359 2008 24 21 46 9 55 54 98 4,604 2007 6 9 44 41 85 43 99 2,278 2008 6 8 46 40 86 54 99 2,344 2007 25 21 44 10 54 43 99 33,370 2008 22 21 47 10 57 54 99 33,939 2007 29 24 40 6 46 43 97 4,001 2008 30 23 42 6 48 54 97 4,270 2007 10 12 49 29 78 43 98 36,375 2008 9 11 52 28 80 54 99 36,837 2007 27 22 43 9 52 43 98 38,500 2008 24 21 46 9 55 54 99 41,189 2007 52 20 23 4 27 43 93 10,071 2008 52 22 22 4 26 54 97 10,494 2007 54 25 20 1 21 43 98 8,946 8,630 2008 50 26 23 1 24 54 99 2007 39 19 37 4 41 43 99 322 2008 30 19 42 9 51 54 98 248 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 11 Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested 2007 9 24 60 7 67 45 99 80,428 2008 10 22 60 8 68 56 99 82,021 2007 7 23 62 8 70 45 99 39,416 2008 7 21 63 9 72 56 99 40,245 2007 11 25 57 6 63 45 98 41,012 2008 12 23 58 7 65 56 99 41,776 2007 12 30 55 3 58 45 98 4,382 2008 12 26 57 4 61 56 98 4,605 2007 3 14 67 15 82 45 99 2,279 2008 5 12 66 18 84 56 99 2,347 2007 14 33 50 3 53 45 99 33,361 2008 14 30 53 3 56 56 99 33,948 2007 13 38 47 1 48 45 98 4,009 2008 17 35 46 2 48 56 97 4,274 2007 4 14 70 12 82 45 99 36,397 2008 5 13 68 14 82 56 99 36,847 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 14 33 50 2 52 45 98 38,516 2008 15 30 52 3 55 56 99 41,207 Students with Disabilities 2007 33 38 28 2 30 45 94 10,102 2008 38 35 26 1 27 56 97 10,507 Limited English Proficient 2007 38 47 14 0 14 45 98 8,937 2008 39 45 16 0 16 56 99 8,633 2007 22 42 36 0 36 45 98 321 2008 18 33 47 1 48 56 98 248 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant Year Percent Falls Far Below Reading Grade 6 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 12 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Writing Grade 6 2007 4 17 74 5 79 99 80,504 2008 5 24 67 5 72 99 81,934 2007 3 11 79 7 86 99 39,485 2008 3 17 74 6 80 99 40,259 2007 6 22 69 3 72 98 41,019 41,675 2008 7 30 61 3 64 99 2007 6 19 71 4 75 98 4,384 2008 6 26 65 3 68 98 4,608 2007 3 8 77 12 89 99 2,277 2008 3 13 73 12 85 99 2,342 2007 7 21 69 3 72 99 33,411 33,904 2008 6 28 63 3 66 99 2007 6 22 70 2 72 98 4,010 2008 8 33 57 1 58 97 4,272 2007 2 12 78 7 85 99 36,422 2008 3 19 72 6 78 99 36,808 2007 7 22 68 2 70 99 38,571 2008 7 30 61 2 63 99 41,158 2007 16 39 43 1 44 95 10,271 10,463 2008 20 46 33 1 34 97 2007 19 37 43 0 43 98 8,973 2008 19 45 36 0 36 99 8,598 2007 8 29 62 2 64 98 318 2008 8 25 63 4 67 98 249 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 13 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Annual Objective Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Mathematics Grade 7 2007 14 17 52 18 70 48 98 80,556 2008 12 17 53 18 71 58 99 81,103 2007 11 17 54 18 72 48 98 39,533 2008 10 16 55 19 74 58 99 39,611 2007 16 17 49 18 67 48 98 41,023 2008 14 17 51 17 68 58 98 41,492 2007 20 21 49 9 58 48 97 4,388 2008 19 22 50 9 59 58 98 4,570 2007 5 8 48 40 88 48 99 2,123 2008 5 7 48 40 88 58 99 2,404 2007 20 22 49 9 58 48 98 33,031 33,166 2008 17 22 52 9 61 58 99 2007 22 25 47 6 53 48 97 4,495 2008 21 27 46 6 52 58 97 4,256 2007 7 11 55 27 82 48 98 36,519 2008 7 11 56 27 83 58 99 36,707 2007 21 23 48 8 56 48 98 37,560 2008 18 23 50 9 59 58 99 39,235 2007 47 24 26 3 29 48 91 9,172 2008 46 27 25 2 27 58 97 9,971 2007 46 30 23 1 24 48 98 8,829 2008 40 32 27 1 28 58 99 8,483 2007 25 25 44 5 49 48 98 348 2008 22 26 46 6 52 58 100 236 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 14 21 6 21 2008 6 2007 12 2008 Number Tested 9 2007 Percent Tested 2008 Annual Objective Asian 24 Percent Pass African American 9 Percent Exceeds Male 2007 Percent Meets Female Percent Approaches All Students Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Reading Grade 7 58 9 67 49 98 80,857 62 8 70 59 99 81,118 62 10 72 49 99 39,667 19 66 9 75 59 99 39,617 26 54 8 62 49 98 41,190 12 23 58 7 65 59 98 41,501 2007 11 29 55 5 60 49 98 4,427 2008 12 25 59 4 63 59 98 4,570 2007 4 13 64 19 83 49 99 2,128 2008 5 11 66 19 85 59 99 2,404 2007 14 32 50 3 53 49 98 33,094 2008 13 28 55 3 58 59 99 33,168 2007 14 36 48 2 50 49 98 4,534 2008 13 33 51 2 53 59 97 4,260 2007 4 15 67 14 81 49 99 36,674 2008 4 13 69 13 82 59 99 36,716 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 14 33 50 3 53 49 98 37,688 2008 14 29 54 3 57 59 99 39,249 Students with Disabilities 2007 33 39 26 2 28 49 94 9,448 2008 36 37 26 1 27 59 97 9,972 Limited English Proficient 2007 37 48 14 0 14 49 98 8,861 2008 36 45 19 0 19 59 99 8,481 2007 18 42 38 2 40 49 99 349 2008 17 36 47 0 47 59 100 236 Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 15 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Percent Tested Number Tested Writing Grade 7 2007 4 14 76 6 82 99 80,981 2008 3 32 63 2 65 99 81,163 2007 2 9 81 8 89 99 39,762 2008 2 24 71 3 74 99 39,640 2007 6 20 71 3 74 98 41,219 2008 4 40 55 1 56 99 41,523 2007 5 16 75 4 79 98 4,431 2008 4 35 59 2 61 98 4,565 2007 2 7 78 13 91 99 2,121 2008 2 16 74 7 81 99 2,401 2007 6 19 73 3 76 99 33,188 2008 4 39 56 1 57 99 33,190 2007 6 23 69 2 71 98 4,522 2008 4 45 51 1 52 97 4,268 2007 2 10 80 8 88 99 36,719 2008 1 25 70 3 73 99 36,739 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 6 20 72 2 74 99 37,791 2008 5 41 54 1 55 99 39,285 Students with Disabilities 2007 16 37 46 1 47 95 9,569 2008 13 61 26 0 26 97 9,959 Limited English Proficient 2007 16 37 46 0 46 98 8,883 2008 13 61 26 0 26 99 8,474 2007 4 24 70 2 72 99 352 2008 3 46 49 1 50 100 236 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 16 All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Number Tested Percent Tested Annual Objective Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Meets Percent Approaches Percent Falls Far Below Subgroup Year Mathematics Grade 8 2007 21 18 47 14 61 22 98 78,751 2008 20 18 49 13 62 38 99 80,807 2007 20 19 49 13 62 22 98 38,866 2008 19 19 50 12 62 38 99 39,655 2007 22 17 46 15 61 22 98 39,885 2008 22 17 47 13 60 38 98 41,152 2007 31 23 40 7 47 22 97 4,313 2008 30 22 43 5 48 38 98 4,607 2007 8 10 50 32 82 22 99 2,074 2008 9 10 50 31 81 38 99 2,265 2007 30 23 42 6 48 22 98 31,505 32,830 2008 28 23 43 6 49 38 99 2007 34 25 37 4 41 22 96 4,500 2008 33 25 39 3 42 38 97 4,433 2007 11 13 54 21 75 22 98 36,359 2008 11 14 55 19 74 38 99 36,672 2007 31 23 40 6 46 22 98 35,114 2008 30 23 42 5 47 38 99 37,937 2007 60 18 20 2 22 22 91 8,482 2008 60 21 18 1 19 38 97 9,578 2007 59 23 17 1 18 22 97 8,568 2008 59 24 17 1 18 38 99 7,963 2007 37 24 36 2 38 22 97 388 2008 33 23 38 5 43 38 99 263 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 17 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested Number Tested Reading Grade 8 2007 11 26 56 7 63 43 98 79,081 2008 11 22 60 7 67 54 99 80,833 2007 8 25 59 8 67 43 99 38,998 2008 8 21 63 8 71 54 99 39,671 2007 13 27 54 6 60 43 98 40,083 2008 13 23 57 6 63 54 98 41,162 2007 14 31 52 3 55 43 98 4,344 2008 15 26 56 3 59 54 98 4,611 2007 5 14 66 15 81 43 99 2,075 2008 6 13 67 14 81 54 99 2,265 2007 17 35 46 2 48 43 98 31,617 2008 16 30 52 3 55 54 99 32,843 2007 18 41 40 1 41 43 97 4,542 2008 18 34 46 2 48 54 97 4,440 2007 5 17 67 11 78 43 99 36,503 2008 5 14 70 11 81 54 99 36,674 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 17 35 45 2 47 43 98 35,243 2008 17 30 51 2 53 54 99 37,950 Students with Disabilities 2007 39 37 23 1 24 43 94 8,786 2008 41 36 22 1 23 54 97 9,582 Limited English Proficient 2007 44 45 11 0 11 43 98 8,619 2008 43 43 14 0 14 54 99 7,969 2007 23 41 36 0 36 43 98 391 2008 19 33 46 3 49 54 99 263 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 18 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Percent Tested Number Tested Writing Grade 8 2007 3 23 72 2 74 98 79,195 2008 2 22 74 2 76 99 80,879 2007 2 17 78 2 80 99 39,089 2008 1 15 80 3 83 99 39,720 2007 4 29 65 1 66 98 40,106 2008 3 28 68 1 69 98 41,159 2007 4 28 68 1 69 98 4,358 2008 4 23 72 1 73 98 4,609 2007 1 12 81 6 87 99 2,079 2008 2 10 82 6 88 99 2,264 2007 5 31 63 1 64 99 31,722 2008 3 30 66 1 67 99 32,859 2007 5 35 60 0 60 97 4,531 2008 3 29 66 1 67 97 4,457 2007 1 15 80 3 83 99 36,505 2008 1 14 82 3 85 99 36,690 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 5 32 62 1 63 98 35,324 2008 4 30 65 1 66 99 37,993 Students with Disabilities 2007 12 52 35 1 36 95 8,851 2008 11 52 38 0 38 97 9,570 Limited English Proficient 2007 16 53 30 0 30 98 8,636 2008 11 55 33 0 33 99 7,963 2007 7 34 59 0 59 98 393 2008 4 27 68 1 69 99 263 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 19 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Percent Tested Number Tested Science Grade 8 All Students 2008 30 20 22 28 50 94 76,726 Female 2008 28 21 23 28 51 94 37,816 Male 2008 32 19 21 29 50 93 38,910 African American 2008 40 22 21 17 38 92 4,333 Asian 2008 16 15 22 48 70 97 2,198 Hispanic 2008 43 24 20 14 34 94 31,088 Native American 2008 49 25 17 9 26 89 4,098 White 2008 16 16 24 44 68 94 35,009 Economically Disadvantaged 2008 44 23 19 14 33 93 35,659 Students with Disabilities 2008 70 16 9 6 15 83 8,251 Limited English Proficient 2008 81 13 4 1 5 92 7,420 Migrant 2008 52 23 14 10 24 96 256 Subgroup This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 20 Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Annual Objective Percent Tested 2007 21 12 54 13 67 25 96 72,115 2008 20 12 54 14 68 40 98 74,259 2007 19 13 56 13 69 25 97 35,581 2008 18 12 55 14 69 40 98 36,867 2007 22 11 53 14 67 25 95 36,534 2008 22 12 52 15 67 40 97 37,392 2007 31 15 49 5 54 25 95 3,926 2008 29 15 49 7 56 40 97 4,275 2007 8 6 53 34 87 25 99 2,009 2008 8 7 48 37 85 40 98 2,036 2007 31 16 48 5 53 25 96 26,182 2008 28 15 50 6 56 40 97 28,079 2007 36 18 43 4 47 25 94 4,289 2008 35 19 43 4 47 40 96 4,246 2007 11 8 60 20 80 25 96 35,709 2008 11 8 59 22 81 40 98 35,623 Economically Disadvantaged 2007 32 16 47 5 52 25 96 22,891 2008 31 16 48 5 53 40 97 26,934 Students with Disabilities 2007 62 13 23 2 25 25 81 6,474 2008 62 16 21 1 22 40 94 7,499 Limited English Proficient 2007 61 17 21 1 22 25 96 4,763 2008 60 18 21 1 22 40 98 5,296 2007 38 17 42 3 45 25 98 456 2008 30 16 52 3 55 40 98 309 Subgroup All Students Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Migrant Number Tested Year Mathematics High School This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 21 Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Annual Objective Percent Pass Percent Exceeds Percent Approaches 2007 7 20 65 7 72 36 97 73,930 2008 6 21 66 7 73 49 98 75,311 2007 6 20 67 8 75 36 98 36,314 Percent Meets Number Tested Female Percent Tested All Students Year Subgroup Percent Falls Far Below Reading High School 2008 4 20 68 8 76 49 98 37,353 2007 9 21 64 6 70 36 97 37,616 37,958 2008 7 22 65 6 71 49 97 2007 10 26 61 3 64 36 96 4,034 2008 8 25 64 3 67 49 97 4,320 2007 4 12 70 15 85 36 99 2,011 2008 3 12 70 15 85 49 98 2,039 2007 12 30 56 2 58 36 97 26,887 28,628 2008 9 31 58 2 60 49 98 2007 11 37 51 1 52 36 95 4,391 2008 10 36 52 1 53 49 97 4,343 2007 3 11 75 11 86 36 98 36,607 2008 2 11 75 12 87 49 98 35,981 2007 13 31 54 2 56 36 97 23,795 2008 10 32 56 2 58 49 98 27,574 2007 30 39 30 1 31 36 90 7,369 2008 25 44 30 1 31 49 94 7,713 2007 37 48 15 0 15 36 97 4,899 2008 29 56 15 0 15 49 98 5,437 2007 19 35 45 1 46 36 97 468 2008 8 38 54 1 55 49 99 320 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 22 Female Male African American Asian Hispanic Native American White Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Migrant Percent Tested Number Tested 4 23 64 9 73 97 73,704 4 27 61 7 68 98 75,111 Percent Exceeds Percent Approaches 2007 2008 Percent Meets Percent Falls Far Below All Students Year Subgroup Percent Pass Writing High School 2007 3 19 68 11 79 98 36,240 2008 3 22 66 10 76 98 37,312 2007 6 27 60 7 67 96 37,464 37,799 2008 6 32 57 5 62 97 2007 6 24 64 6 70 96 4,022 2008 6 30 59 5 64 97 4,304 2007 3 12 61 24 85 99 2,002 2008 3 15 62 20 82 98 2,041 2007 7 32 58 3 61 97 26,782 2008 6 36 55 3 58 97 28,527 2007 7 39 51 2 53 94 4,346 2008 8 42 49 2 51 96 4,303 2007 2 14 70 13 83 97 36,552 2008 2 19 68 11 79 98 35,936 2007 8 34 55 3 58 97 23,681 2008 8 38 52 3 55 97 27,450 2007 19 51 29 1 30 89 7,272 2008 20 55 24 0 24 93 7,650 2007 27 53 20 0 20 96 4,851 5,381 2008 24 58 18 0 18 97 2007 12 45 42 2 44 96 464 2008 10 43 46 1 47 96 312 This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 23 Year Percent Falls Far Below Percent Approaches Percent Meets Percent Exceeds Percent Pass Percent Tested Number Tested Science High School All Students 2008 49 19 20 12 32 58 43,935 Female 2008 49 20 20 11 31 59 22,135 Male 2008 49 17 20 14 34 57 21,800 African American 2008 60 18 15 6 21 62 2,739 Asian 2008 36 20 23 22 45 55 1,146 Hispanic 2008 62 18 14 5 19 61 17,574 Native American 2008 68 18 11 3 14 62 2,737 White 2008 33 19 27 20 47 54 19,739 Economically Disadvantaged 2008 63 18 14 5 19 61 16,768 Students with Disabilities 2008 84 8 6 2 8 47 3,789 Limited English Proficient 2008 92 6 2 0 2 55 2,983 Migrant 2008 72 14 12 2 14 61 191 Subgroup This table shows the AIMS results for the past two years. Results are shown as percent at each performance level and percent passing. Also shown are the percent of students tested. 24 NCLB Federal Accountability School Improvement Status Improvement Status 2007 2008 Year 1 151 105 Year 2 46 91 Corrective Action 28 46 Restructuring Implemented 24 14 Restructuring Planning 21 35 Out of School Improvement 27 14 Warning 133 162 Total Identified 270 291 Total Not-Identified 762 701 Number of Title I Schools Identified for Improvement. For status definitions, please see page 27. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)* School and District Year School AYP District AYP Met Not Met Met Not Met 2007 1340 512 327 233 2008 1360 512 341 219 *AYP: A measure of school performance as mandated by the federal government under the No Child Left Behind Act. AYP holds schools accountable for the performance of subgroups, as well as all students. AYP measures schools toward the goal of having 100 percent of all students proficient in state standards for reading and math by 2013-14. Statewide Four-Year Graduation Rates (percent) 2006 2007 All Students 70 73 Female 74 78 Male 66 69 African American 69 72 Asian/Pacific Islander 87 86 Hispanic 60 65 Native American 51 55 White 79 81 Limited English Proficient 44 46 Students with Disabilities 61 63 Economically Disadvantaged 65 65 Migrant 72 74 25 Average Daily Attendance Rates (percent) Grades 1-8 2008 All Students 94.67 Asian/Pacific Islander 96.38 African American 94.9 Hispanic 94.87 Native American 92.29 White 94.35 Female 94.65 Male 94.68 Limited English Proficient 94.67 Students with Disabilities 94.67 Economically Disadvantaged 94.67 This table shows statewide performance on the additional indicator as required by the No Child Left Behind Act. AZ LEARNS - State Accountability Achievement Profile Number of Schools Excelling 328 Highly Performing 252 Performing Plus 392 Performing 744 Underperforming 160 Failing to Meet Academic Standards 20 Total Number of Profiles 1896 This table shows the number of schools that have earned each of the AZ LEARNS profiles in 2008. AZ LEARNS is the system for evaluating schools required by state law. For profile definitions, please see page 41. Highly Qualified Teachers 2007-2008 Highest Degree Held Number of Teachers Bachelors 33,650 Masters 25,509 Doctorate 390 Education Specialist 86 Other 392 Professional Qualifications of All Public K-12 School Teachers in the State 26 State High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools 5.3 7.5 2.6 Percentage of Core Academic Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of Public K-12 Teachers with Emergency/ Provisional Certification 3.8% Title I Schools Identified for Improvement Title I School Improvement - Year 1 – A Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for two consecutive years. Upon identification, the school must: notify parents/legal guardians of the school status; develop and implement a School Improvement Plan within 90 days of the identification; set aside 10% of the schools Title I funds for professional development for teachers and the principal; the district must offer parents the option of transfer and support to the school in its school improvement efforts. Title I School Improvement - Year 2 – A Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for three consecutive years. Upon identification, the school must: notify parents/legal guardians of the school status; develop and implement a School Improvement Plan within 90 days of the identification; set aside 10% of the schools Title I funds for professional development for teachers and the principal; the district must offer parents the option of transfer and offer supplemental educational services to eligible students, and offer support to the school in its school improvement efforts. Title I School Improvement - Year 3 or Corrective Action – A Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for four consecutive years. Upon identification, the school must: notify parents/legal guardians of the school status; develop and implement a School Improvement Plan within 90 days of the identification; set aside 10% of the schools Title I funds for professional development for teachers and the principal; the district must offer parents the option of transfer and offer supplemental educational services to eligible students, and offer support to the school in its school improvement efforts. In addition, the school must choose and implement at least one of six corrective actions. See Section 1116(b)(7) of NCLB for a list of the corrective action options. Title I School Improvement - Year 4 or Restructuring (Planning Phase) – A Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for five consecutive years. Upon identification, the school must: notify parents/legal guardians of the school status; develop and implement a School Improvement Plan within 90 days of the identification; set aside 10% of the schools Title I funds for professional development for teachers and the principal; the district must offer parents the option of transfer and offer supplemental educational services to eligible students, and offer support to the school in its school improvement efforts. In addition, the school must prepare a restructuring plan and make necessary arrangements to carry out one of three restructuring activities. See Section 1116(b)(8) of NCLB for a list of the restructuring activities. Title I School Improvement - Year 5 or Restructuring (Implementation Phase) – A Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for six consecutive years. Upon identification, the school must: notify parents/legal guardians of the school status; develop and implement a School Improvement Plan within 90 days of the identification; set aside 10% of the schools Title I funds for professional development for teachers and the principal; the district must offer parents the option of transfer and offer supplemental educational services to eligible students, and offer support to the school in its school improvement efforts. In addition, the school must implement the restructuring plan. Out of School Improvement – A Title I school that has made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for two consecutive years and is no longer identified. Total Identified – Total number of Title I schools identified for Title I school improvement. Total Not-Identified – Total number of Title I and non-Title I schools identified as making adequate yearly progress (AYP). Title I School – any school that receives Federal Title I funds; the school agrees to the accountability measures mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). 27 AZ LEARNS - State Accountability Excelling - meets or exceeds state performance and state progress goals and has the requisite percentage of students “Exceeding the Standard” category on AIMS. School performance was at or above the state baseline and/or the school made adequate growth during the past three years. Additionally, the school met the performance threshold required for Excelling schools with a certain percentage of their students exceeding the standard on the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) over the past three years. Highly Performing - meets or exceeds state performance and state progress goals and has the requisite percentage of students “Exceeding the Standard” category on AIMS. School receives total scale value placing it in the Highly Performing classification. School performance was at or above the state baseline and/or the school made adequate growth during the past three years. Additionally, the school met the performance threshold required for Highly Performing schools with a certain percentage of their students “Exceeds the Standard” category on the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) over the past three years. Performing - meets state performance goals, and meets state progress goals. School receives total scale value placing it in the Performing classification. School performance was at or above the state baseline and/or the school made adequate growth during the past three years. Performing Plus - above state performance goals, however the number of students exceeding the standard on the AIMS test is not sufficient to earn a highly performing or excelling label. Underperforming - needs to meet state performance and state progress goals. School receives total scale value placing it in the Underperforming classification. School performance was below the state baseline and did not make adequate growth, or the school started above the state baseline and did not make adequate growth during the past three years. Failing to Meet the Academic Standards - needs to meet state performance and state progress goals. School performance has been designated as Underperforming for three consecutive years and a site review determined that the designation of Failing to Meet the Academic Standards was warranted. 28 Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction Research and Evaluation 602-542-5151 www.ade.az.gov ReportCards@ade.az.gov The distribution of this report is mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act. The contents of this publication were developed with funds allocated by the U.S. Department of Education under Title I, Part A of the No Child Left Behind Act. The distribution of this report is mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act. The contents of this publication were developed with funds allocated by the U.S. Department of Education under Title I, Part A of the No Child Left Behind Act. The Arizona Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, religion, sexual orientation or age in its programs, activities or in its hiring and employment practices. The following division has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies: Administrative Services, 1535 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85007, Phone: (602) 542-3186, Fax: (602) 542-3073 Research and Evaluation 602-542-5151 • www.ade.az.gov • ReportCards@ade.az.gov Printed in Phoenix, AZ by the Arizona Department of Education. Copies: 1,169,000, Total Cost: $80,099.76, Unit Cost: $.0685, Date: 3/08 29