2009 Arizona’s Housing Market ... a glance. 2009 GOVERNOR’S HOUSING FORUM gearing up for the future collaboration | resources | knowledge | strategies This report was prepared for distribution at the 2009 Governor’s Housing Forum September 14-16, 2009 JANICE K. BREWER MICHAEL TRAILOR GOVERNOR DIRECTOR September 2009 Dear Community Partner, The Arizona Department of Housing is pleased to present you with the 2009 Arizona Housing Market … a glance. Arizona’s economy, which largely depends on the real estate industry, has been hit hard. Ongoing job losses and significant depreciation in real estate values continue to exacerbate the foreclosure problem adding unintended supply to the already depressed housing market. On a positive note, as prices of homes have fallen approximately 50 percent from their peak, affordability has improved. Federal stimulus such as the Neighborhood Stabilization Program and 8 percent homebuyer tax incentive are helping to absorb excess housing inventory. Hundreds of Arizonan’s are taking advantage of this unique opportunity, purchasing homes and stabilizing our neighborhoods. Lenders must do a better job of providing mortgage modifications and other types of assistance for at-risk homeowners or the foreclosure problems will persist as a vicious cycle. The flow of foreclosures must be stopped so the real estate market can recover and start adding jobs again. Unfortunately, offsetting improved affordability are much tougher lending standards and unemployment that is now reaching 10 percent or more. Our customers, Arizonans who cannot afford market price homes or rentals, are growing in numbers and our resources to serve them are shrinking. The demand for housing advocates to be diligent and innovative has never been greater. We cannot afford to use our resources to fund anything but the very best of projects that meet the needs of our customers. As I travel around the state I have seen some very good examples of what we want to replicate. It is our hope that this year’s Governor’s Housing Forum will stimulate your creativity and provide resources to enable you to better serve our customers. I am grateful for the members of our communities who are so very dedicated to solving Arizona’s housing issues. Sincerely, Michael Trailor Director 1110 WEST WASHINGTON • SUITE 310 • PHOENIX, AZ 85007 • 602-771-1000 • FAX 602-771-1002 TTY 602-771-1001 • WEBSITE www.azhousing.gov Home of the Arizona Housing Finance Authority 2009 Arizona’s Housing Market . . . a glance. The current recession which was originally triggered by troubles in the housing and financial markets has also dragged down the rest of the economy into recession. How long the recession will last is not clear, but there are signs that improvements in the economy and housing market will become noticeable towards the end of this year or by the first half of next year. Last year at this time economists were debating whether or not the national and Arizona economies were in a recession. This year we know that both economies are in the midst of a severe and broad-based recession. The national economy has been in recession since December 2007 and Arizona’s economy started contraction a few months prior to that in the third quarter of 2007. Although there are some encouraging signs that existing home sales in Arizona surpass that of last year’s at this time, new home construction and sales are still very weak and home loan approval standards are tight. In terms of home foreclosure rate, Florida, Nevada, California and Arizona have been on top of the list for most of the 2008 and 2009. Some projections show that Arizona’s foreclosure severity may noticeably ease up by the middle of 2010. As the housing and broader economic market follows their adjustment processes, many Arizona families are struggling to find and secure affordable housing as renters or homeowners. Affordable housing is generally described as standard and sanitary dwellings that cost no more than 30 percent of monthly household gross income. The U.S. Census Bureau’s 2007 American Community Survey data reveal that in Arizona, almost 46 percent of all renters and more than 26 percent of homeowners spend more than 30 percent of their incomes on housing. The analyses and tables in this document are based on data available for early 2009 or for 2008 on housing, income, population, employment, and wages by occupation and by industry. To enable equitable comparison and consistency in this report, we have compared communities across the state on affordability reflected in the median home price or fair market rent in each area. Median price refers to the middle of the price range. The information compiled for this report also reveals that median home prices in Arizona’s rural communities range from a relatively low price of $69,000 in Parker to a high price of $417,000 in the Sedona area. The most expensive among all Arizona rural and urban communities is the Town of Paradise Valley, with a median home sales price of $1.3 million. In general, home prices are much higher in urban areas and in communities that attract large numbers of seasonal and recreational tourists. Comparing this year’s report on affordability with those of previous years, it is clear that median home sales prices have been falling in many communities and affordability has been improving. While lower prices can improve affordability, they can adversely impact many owners and potential sellers whom are watching their limited equity erode as prices decline to and even below existing debt level. The median housing price for existing homes at the state level and for most of the communities that are included in this study, reached their peak in either 2006 or in 2007. They have been following a declining path ever since. From 2007 to 2009, the median price of existing homes decreased by eight percent at the state level and dropped by approximately 30 percent for all jurisdictions combined. 1 2009 General Trends in Arizona’s Housing Market . . . a glance. Arizona Home Prices vs. Median Income Home prices have been increasing faster than income. According to the data from Federal Housing Finance Board, home prices in Arizona have been steadily on the rise, except for 2007, 2008 and 2009. • From year 2000 to 2008, the median sales price of homes in Arizona increased by 70.7 percent. During the same period, median family income increased by only 22.4 percent. • From 2007 to 2008, the median sales price of homes in Arizona decreased by 2.4 percent. During the same period, median family income increased by 7.5 percent. • Home prices have also been declining in 2009. 2 For census data by Arizona counties on median home values and median household income for the years 1990, 2000 and 2007 see Table 5 in the Appendices. Arizona Home Prices and Income* $ 300,000 $240,000 $ 250,000 $ 200,000 $ 150,000 $140,600 $143,900 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $0 $47,800 2000 $49,700 2001 $146,000 $51,900 2002 $156,500 $52,700 2003 $260,000 $246,000 $54,900 $54,400 $240,000 $169,000 $53,300 2004 $53,300 2005 2006 2007 $58,500 2008 Median Home Price Median Family Income *The Federal Housing Finance Board has revised the Median Home Prices for 2005 and 2006 from those reported in the 2006 Arizona’s Housing Market at a Glance. Source: Arizona Department of Housing, Federal Housing Finance Board, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2009 General Trends in Arizona’s Housing Market . . . a glance. Arizona Home Prices vs. Other States Based on the House Price Index (HPI) by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), housing price appreciation in Arizona was ranked number 48th nationally for the first quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009. Three years ago, Arizona’s housing appreciation rate was ranked number one among all states. This is a clear indication of a significant slowdown in Arizona’s housing market. It is very unusual for states such as Arizona, Florida, Nevada and California to experience such a depressed state in their housing markets as evidenced by declining housing prices. State Annual Price Increase or Decrease Ranking Alaska 4.79% 1 Oklahoma 0.30% 2 North Dakota 0.30% 3 South Dakota 0.29% 4 Kentucky -0.54% 5 Texas -0.58% 6 Missouri -0.67% 7 North Carolina -0.80% 8 Arizona -19.51% 48 California -22.12% 49 Florida -22.46% 50 Nevada -31.10% 51 -7.1% - U.S. Average Data Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), First Quarter, 2009. 3 2009 General Trends in Arizona’s Housing Market .. . a glance. Median Home Prices - 2009 Median home prices in Arizona rural communities range from a low price of $69,000 in Parker to a high price of $417,000 in the Sedona area. For cities and towns in Maricopa County, the lowest median price of $68,900 was reported for El Mirage, and the highest median price of $1,300,000 for Paradise Valley. While the first two bar charts below show the 2009 median home prices for selected rural communities, the third bar chart is exclusively for jurisdictions in Maricopa County. In general, home prices are much higher in urban communities and those that attract tourists, or have a relatively higher percentage of seasonal, recreational, or occasional use homes. High-Price Housing Areas $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $0 4 s y n tt w aff ms rea ista ayson kside ord ale Cit Ne cso sco gst aA a illia rra V og su P Tu Saff L oa Pre N r W Fla v e t p a Si Me eto eH nix Pin Lak oe h P n do Se a m Yu lle Low rvi ow ringe h S Sp Low-Price Housing Areas $ 160,000 $ 140,000 $ 120,000 $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000 y e ow sal Cit nsl Re Wi or t e ix M ead h ull B en o Ph k y las Elo lbroo ug Do Ho e is an be nd Lu gm Glo Gra San Kin sa a C n fto Cli ce ge ren oolid Flo C er k Par Major Cities in Metro Phoenix (May 2009) $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 le da tts Sco nH Fo tai un rt ek ler pe ills be nd Cre Tem Gil ha ve C a C ria o Pe r yea od Go sa nty rprise ndale ndale oenix irage Me ou o Ph Su Gle aC El M Av p co ari M * Paradise Valley median sales price of $1.3 million was too high to include in the above graph. Note: First quarter 2009 prices for Fountain Hills and Cave Creek and May 2009 prices for all other jurisdictions. Source: Realty Studies at ASU Polytechnic. 2009 Workforce Housing Affordability ...a glance. Police Officers, Teachers, Nurses and Firefighters The following table shows the ability of a police officer to own a median price home which is affordable in selected communities. Similar details for other occupations such as firefighter, teacher, retail worker, and waiter/waitress are presented in Table 1 in the Appendices. • One Income Earner per Household: A police officer would be able to afford buying a house in only five out of 13 of the following communities in Arizona, assuming he/she is the only income earner in the household. • Two Income Earners per Household: A police officer, with the financial help of another income earner in the household, would be able to afford buying a house in 11out of the 13 following jurisdictions. One Income Earner Per Household Two Income Earners Per Household Hourly Wage Needed to Buy a Median Price House Median Hourly Wage of a Police Officer Affordability Status Hourly Wage of a Police Officer and Another Income Earner* Affordability Status Sedona $58.04 $17.43 Not Affordable $29.63 Not Affordable Flagstaff $45.23 $17.25 Not Affordable $29.33 Not Affordable Pinetop-lakeside $25.05 $19.25 Not Affordable $32.73 Affordable Payson $25.05 $19.25 Not Affordable $32.73 Affordable Phoenix (Maricopa County) $18.79 $25.83 Affordable $43.91 Affordable Sierra Vista $27.15 $22.38 Not Affordable $38.05 Affordable Tucson (Pima County) $22.96 $18.70 Not Affordable $31.79 Affordable Kingman $14.20 $15.54 Affordable $26.42 Affordable Casa Grande $15.57 $25.83 Affordable $43.91 Affordable Yuma $19.83 $15.24 Not Affordable $25.91 Affordable Nogales $22.27 $22.38 Affordable $38.05 Affordable Douglas $12.25 $22.38 Affordable $38.05 Affordable State Average $33.40 $25.46 Not Affordable $43.28 Affordable Selected Areas * Assuming that the hourly wage or income of the second income earner in the household is 70 percent of the police officer’s income. Data Source: Arizona Department of Commerce – Research Administration. 5 ...a glance. 2009 Workforce Housing Affordability Renting a Two Bedroom Apartment in Selected Counties Despite the emphasis on homeownership, renter households comprise almost one-third of the total occupied homes in Arizona according to Census 2000 (32 percent) and American Community Survey 2005-2007 (31.4 percent). The following graph shows the amount a household must earn to afford a two bedroom rental unit at the area’s Fair Market Rent, based on the generally accepted affordability standard of paying no more than 30 percent of one’s income for housing costs. The median hourly wage used in this analysis is that of Retail Sales Workers in the corresponding county. Similar details for other selected occupations are presented in Table 1 in the Appendices. $0 Coconino $5 $10 Cochise Greenlee State Average $ 14.75 $ 9.58 $ 14.35 $ 10.66 $ 14.02 $ 8.65 $ 13.44 $ 8.65 $ 13.37 $ 8.65 $ 10.56 La Paz Apache $ 14.29 $ 9.69 Navajo Graham $ 15.56 $ 10.56 Mohave Santa Cruz $ 16.23 $ 10.72 Gila Yuma $ 16.87 $ 10.51 Yavapai Pima $25 $ 16.87 $ 10.51 Pinal $20 $ 20.08 $ 8.90 Maricopa 6 $15 $ 10.56 $ 13.25 Hourly Wage Needed to Rent Median Hourly Wage Paid $ 12.92 $ 12.63 $ 8.65 $ 11.04 $ 10.56 $ 10.29 $ 15.03 Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing and Arizona Department of Commerce – Research Administration. 2009 Rural & Urban Growth . . . a glance. Employment and Population Growth 2001 – 2008 Most of the economic growth in Arizona, in terms of employment and population occurred in the urban areas from 2001-2008. Statewide employment increased by 351,500 jobs during that period. Of the total increase, 307,300 jobs, 87.4 percent were attributed to employment growth in the urban areas. The remaining 44,200 jobs (12.6 percent) went to the rural areas. One out of every three additions to total employment statewide occurred in the low-wage industries. Workers in these industries, on average, do not make enough money to buy a median price house or rent an apartment as a single income earner. Examples of such industries include retail trade, leisure and hospitality, real estate rental and leasing, and other services (i.e., repair shops and barber shops). Further details are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4, at the end of the report. Arizona’s economy has been following a declining growth path in 2008, as demonstrated by the loss of 81,000 civilian non-farm jobs for the January to December period. During the 2001-2008 period, population of the state increased by 1,309,670 persons. Close to two-thirds (71.7 percent or 939,230 persons) became resident of urban areas. The remaining 28.3 percent (370,440 persons) chose to live in one of the 13 rural counties of Arizona. The following pie charts illustrate that the share of employment growth in rural counties (12.6 percent) has been smaller than their population growth share (28.3 percent). It is very likely that limited employment opportunities in the rural counties are a contributing factor to this variation. Population Growth: 2001-2008 Employment Growth: 2001-2008 12.6% or 44,200 additional jobs 28.3% or 370,440 additional people 71.7% or 939,230 additional people 87.4% or 307,300 additional jobs Rural Urban Data Source: Arizona Department of Commerce – Research Administration. 7 Appendices Table 1: Housing Affordability for Home Buyers and Renters for Common Occupations in Selected Arizona Communities 2007 8 Hourly Median Wage City/Town County Bullhead City Casa Grande Coolidge Douglas Eloy Flagstaff Florence Globe Holbrook Kingman Lake Havasu City Nogales Parker Payson Phoenix Metro - Resale Phoenix Metro - New Pinetop-Lakeside Prescott Safford San Luis Sedona Show Low Sierra Vista Springerville Tucson Williams Winslow Yuma Arizona*** Mohave Pinal Pinal Cochise Pinal Coconino Pinal Gila Navajo Mohave Mohave Santa Cruz La Paz Gila Maricopa Maricopa Navajo Yavapai Graham Yuma Yavapai/Coconino Navajo Cochise Apache Pima Coconino Navajo Yuma - Median Home Price* $260,985 $180,000 $125,900 $88,900 $118,450 $370,000 $157,270 $142,000 $149,500 $204,000 $249,000 $169,000 $279,000 $300,000 $262,570 $296,425 $329,593 $319,000 $168,500 $136,000 $577,500 $337,144 $212,228 $148,900 $210,000 $335,000 $112,000 $174,950 $260,000 Hourly Wage Needed to Buy $38.19 $26.34 $18.42 $13.01 $17.49 $54.14 $23.01 $20.78 $21.88 $29.85 $36.77 $24.73 $40.83 $43.90 $38.42 $43.38 $48.23 $48.68 $24.66 $19.90 $84.50 $49.33 $31.05 $21.79 $30.73 $49.02 $16.39 $25.60 $38.04 2 BDRM Aptmnt Monthly Rent** $676 $782 $782 $617 $782 $939 $782 $713 $610 $676 $676 $645 $592 $713 $782 $782 $610 $744 $582 $695 $744 $610 $617 $522 $772 $939 $610 $695 $703 Hourly Wage Needed to Rent $13.00 $15.04 $15.04 $11.87 $15.04 $18.06 $15.04 $13.71 $11.73 $13.00 $13.00 $12.40 $11.38 $13.71 $15.04 $15.04 $11.73 $14.31 $11.19 $13.37 $14.31 $11.73 $11.87 $10.04 $14.85 $18.06 $11.73 $13.37 $13.52 Police Officer 22.59 22.13 22.13 19.78 22.13 22.78 22.13 20.39 17.30 22.59 22.59 25.53 21.55 20.39 24.06 24.06 17.30 21.55 18.64 17.58 21.55 17.30 22.13 18.02 25.00 22.78 17.30 17.58 23.74 Teacher 15.83 21.39 21.39 17.23 21.39 17.28 21.39 17.14 17.51 15.83 15.83 17.81 15.83 17.14 15.59 15.59 17.51 17.68 16.25 15.11 17.68 17.51 21.39 17.88 17.35 17.28 17.51 15.11 16.16 Retail Worker 8.72 8.87 8.87 8.00 8.87 8.52 8.87 8.47 8.40 8.72 8.72 8.31 8.80 8.47 9.62 9.62 8.40 9.38 8.59 8.64 9.38 8.40 8.87 7.53 9.08 8.52 8.40 8.64 9.33 Nurse 18.24 20.26 20.26 17.23 20.26 19.88 20.26 18.48 19.09 18.24 18.24 14.08 17.24 18.48 20.04 20.04 19.09 19.71 18.48 17.12 19.71 19.09 20.26 20.02 19.37 19.88 19.09 17.12 19.72 Firefighter Waitperson 19.71 15.37 15.37 13.16 15.37 15.62 15.37 14.38 13.43 19.71 19.71 13.16 15.37 14.38 21.26 21.26 13.43 12.97 13.11 15.37 12.97 13.43 15.37 13.43 20.23 15.62 13.43 15.37 17.59 Total of All Occupations 6.43 6.61 6.61 6.24 6.61 6.72 6.61 6.43 6.49 6.43 6.43 6.83 6.70 6.43 6.77 6.77 6.49 6.78 6.53 6.60 6.78 6.49 6.61 6.40 6.38 6.72 6.49 6.60 6.67 12.09 12.88 12.88 13.36 12.88 12.54 12.88 12.87 12.92 12.09 12.09 11.02 11.30 12.87 14.07 14.07 12.92 13.33 13.04 10.06 13.33 12.92 12.88 13.34 12.56 12.54 12.92 10.06 12.97 Affordability Calculation Assumptions: 30% of income is allocated to housing. For buying a house additional assumptions included 5% down payment, 6.6% interest rate at 30-years fixed, plus allocation of 21% of the monthly payments to property taxes, insurance and other costs such as PMI. * Most home prices are median, but a few (Pinetop-Lakeside, Show Low, Springerville) are average prices. Most prices are for April 2007 and some are for May, June, or for first quarter, 2007. ** Apartment Rents - HUD 2007 Fair Market Rents. Rents shown are for 2-bedroom units. *** The Federal Housing Finance Board has revised the Median Home Prices for 2005 and 2006 from those reported in the 2006 Arizona’s Housing Market at a Glance. Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing, Arizona Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, ASU Polytechnic - Real Estate Studies, various local real estate associations, and local governments. The historical information in these three tables illustrates the affordability of owning a home or renting an apartment in various communities around Arizona based on home prices and hourly wages. For 2009, a new category has emerged: those who can buy a house, but cannot afford to rent. 2008 Hourly Median Wage City/Town County Bullhead City Casa Grande Clifton Coolidge Douglas Eloy Flagstaff Florence Globe Holbrook Kingman Lake Havasu City Nogales Parker Payson Phoenix Metro - Resale Phoenix Metro - New Pinetop-Lakeside Prescott Safford San Luis Sedona Show Low Sierra Vista Springerville Tucson* Williams Winslow Yuma Arizona Mohave Pinal Greenlee Pinal Cochise Pinal Coconino Pinal Gila Navajo Mohave Mohave Santa Cruz La Paz Gila Maricopa Maricopa Navajo Yavapai Graham Yuma Yavapai/Coconino Navajo Cochise Apache Pima Coconino Navajo Yuma - Median Home Price* $241,000 $146,000 $104,983 $119,950 $109,000 $95,930 $315,000 $141,660 $127,500 $115,000 $151,000 $247,500 $166,251 $270,000 $259,900 $211,305 $253,505 $258,000 $311,054 $174,000 $125,000 $462,500 $234,500 $189,899 $143,692 $199,900 $220,000 $86,750 $197,750 $246,000 Hourly Wage Needed to Buy $34.97 $21.19 $15.24 $17.41 $15.82 $13.92 $45.71 $20.56 $18.50 $16.69 $21.91 $35.92 $24.13 $39.18 $37.72 $30.66 $36.79 $37.44 $45.14 $25.25 $18.14 $67.12 $34.03 $27.56 $20.85 $29.01 $31.93 $12.59 $28.70 $35.70 2 BDRM Aptmnt Monthly Rent** $723 $862 $674 $862 $678 $862 $1,012 $862 $782 $668 $723 $723 $707 $652 $782 $8.62 $862 $668 $818 $637 $743 $818 $668 $678 $574 $762 $1,012 $668 $743 $762 Hourly Wage Needed to Rent $13.90 $16.58 $12.96 $16.58 $13.04 $16.58 $19.46 $16.58 $15.04 $12.85 $13.90 $13.90 $13.60 $12.54 $15.04 $16.58 $16.58 $12.85 $15.73 $12.25 $14.29 $15.73 $12.85 $13.04 $11.04 $14.65 $19.46 $12.85 $14.29 $14.65 Police Officer 24.42 17.08 16.11 17.08 21.17 17.08 23.47 17.08 21.68 14.35 24.42 24.42 24.84 23.80 21.69 24.84 24.84 14.35 22.01 23.41 18.45 22.01 14.35 21.17 19.54 25.87 23.47 14.35 18.45 24.34 Teacher 16.74 21.93 16.59 21.93 16.10 21.93 18.24 21.93 16.24 18.12 16.74 16.74 18.51 17.41 16.24 16.28 16.28 18.12 18.41 16.84 17.37 18.41 18.12 16.10 18.71 17.86 18.24 18.12 17.37 16.91 Retail Worker 11.75 8.89 7.17 8.89 8.28 8.89 8.55 8.89 8.73 8.61 11.75 11.75 8.60 8.98 8.73 9.66 9.66 8.61 9.53 8.72 9.32 9.53 8.61 8.28 7.32 9.30 8.55 8.61 9.32 9.44 Nurse 19.38 20.81 17.77 20.81 17.77 20.81 18.07 20.81 19.28 19.22 19.38 19.38 13.34 16.69 19.28 20.54 20.54 19.22 20.71 17.77 18.40 20.71 19.22 17.77 18.45 20.06 18.07 19.22 18.40 20.24 Firefighter 18.38 18.52 15.39 18.52 16.00 18.52 16.86 18.52 15.39 14.35 18.38 18.38 16.23 15.39 15.39 22.19 22.19 14.35 16.03 15.39 15.58 16.03 14.35 16.00 13.57 18.76 16.86 14.35 15.58 17.83 Waitperson 7.37 7.25 7.18 7.25 7.08 7.25 7.22 7.25 7.12 7.29 7.37 7.37 7.34 7.18 7.12 7.30 7.30 7.29 7.36 7.18 7.20 7.36 7.29 7.08 7.10 7.17 7.22 7.29 7.20 7.26 Total of All Occupations 12.73 13.21 19.55 13.21 14.04 13.21 12.84 13.21 14.33 13.77 12.73 12.73 11.17 11.44 14.33 14.56 14.56 13.77 13.06 12.88 11.46 13.06 13.77 14.04 13.56 14.18 12.84 13.77 11.46 14.25 Affordability Calculation Assumptions: 30% of income is allocated to housing. For buying a house additional assumptions included 5% down payment, 6.5% interest rate at 30-years fixed, plus allocation of 21% of the monthly payments to property taxes, insurance and other costs such as PMI. * Most home prices are median, but a few are average prices. Most prices are for April 2008 and some are for May, June, or for first quarter, 2008. ** Apartment Rents - HUD 2008 Fair Market Rents. Rents shown are for 2-bedroom units. Can afford to only buy Can afford to buy or rent Cannot afford to buy or rent Can afford to only rent 2009 Hourly Median Wage City/Town County Bullhead City Casa Grande Clifton Coolidge Douglas Eloy Flagstaff Florence Globe Holbrook Kingman Lake Havasu City Nogales Parker Payson Phoenix Metro - Resale Phoenix Metro - New Pinetop-Lakeside Prescott Safford San Luis Sedona Show Low Sierra Vista Springerville Tucson* Williams Winslow Yuma Arizona Mohave Pinal Greenlee Pinal Cochise Pinal Coconino Pinal Gila Navajo Mohave Mohave Santa Cruz La Paz Gila Maricopa Maricopa Navajo Yavapai Graham Yuma Yavapai/Coconino Navajo Cochise Apache Pima Coconino Navajo Yuma - Median Home Price* $139,000 $111,900 $81,406 $77,520 $88,000 $91,290 $325,000 $80,000 $129,900 $88,800 $102,000 $155,000 $160,000 $69,000 $180,000 $135,000 $217,535 $180,000 $255,750 $170,000 $105,000 $417,000 $141,000 $195,050 $139,750 $165,000 $197,500 $130,000 $142,500 $240,000 Hourly Wage Needed to Buy $19.35 $15.57 $11.33 $10.79 $12.25 $12.71 $45.23 $11.13 $18.08 $12.36 $14.20 $21.57 $22.27 $9.60 $25.05 $18.79 $30.28 $25.05 $35.60 $23.66 $14.61 $58.04 $19.62 $27.15 $19.45 $22.96 $27.49 $18.09 $19.83 $33.40 2 BDRM Aptmnt Monthly Rent** $746 $877 $695 $877 $699 $877 $1,044 $877 $809 $689 $746 $746 $729 $672 $809 $877 $877 $689 $844 $657 $767 $844 $689 $699 $593 $743 $1,044 $689 $767 $782 Hourly Wage Needed to Rent $14.35 $16.87 $13.37 $16.87 $13.44 $16.87 $20.08 $16.87 $15.56 $13.25 $14.35 $14.35 $14.02 $12.92 $15.56 $16.87 $16.87 $13.25 $16.23 $12.63 $14.75 $16.23 $13.25 $13.44 $11.40 $14.29 $20.08 $13.25 $14.75 $15.03 Police Officer 15.94 25.83 22.38 25.83 22.38 25.83 17.25 25.83 19.25 19.25 15.94 15.94 22.38 19.25 19.25 25.83 25.83 19.25 17.43 22.38 15.24 17.43 19.25 22.38 19.25 18.70 17.25 19.25 15.24 25.46 Teacher Retail Worker 18.17 18.65 17.99 18.65 17.99 18.65 18.54 18.65 18.73 18.73 18.17 18.17 17.99 18.73 18.73 18.65 18.65 18.73 18.77 17.99 18.57 18.77 18.73 17.99 18.73 18.78 18.54 18.73 18.57 18.56 10.66 10.51 8.65 10.51 8.65 10.51 8.90 10.51 10.56 10.56 10.56 10.56 8.65 10.56 10.56 10.51 10.51 10.56 10.72 8.65 9.58 10.72 10.56 8.65 10.56 9.69 8.90 10.56 9.58 10.29 Nurse 20.15 21.42 18.91 221.42 18.91 21.42 17.40 21.42 19.76 19.76 20.15 20.15 18.91 19.76 19.76 21.42 21.42 19.76 21.76 18.91 19.30 21.76 19.76 18.91 19.76 20.86 17.40 19.76 19.30 21.01 Firefighter 16.29 20.93 17.00 20.93 17.00 20.93 19.55 20.93 14.32 14.32 16.29 16.29 17.00 14.32 14.32 20.93 20.93 14.32 18.29 17.00 16.89 18.29 14.32 17.00 14.32 19.08 19.55 14.32 16.89 18.55 Waitperson 7.49 7.71 7.35 7.71 7.35 7.71 7.48 7.71 7.35 7.35 7.49 7.49 7.35 7.35 7.35 7.71 7.71 7.35 7.76 7.35 7.60 7.76 7.35 7.35 7.35 7.50 7.48 7.35 7.60 7.61 Total of All Occupations 13.35 15.15 14.59 15.15 14.59 15.15 13.01 15.15 14.00 14.00 13.35 13.35 14.59 14.00 14.00 15.15 15.15 14.00 13.76 14.59 11.89 13.76 14.00 14.59 14.00 14.82 13.01 14.00 11.89 14.87 Affordability Calculation Assumptions: 30% of income is allocated to housing. For buying a house additional assumptions included 5% down payment, 6.0% interest rate at 30-years fixed, plus allocation of 21% of the monthly payments to property taxes, insurance and other costs such as PMI. * Most home prices are median, but a few are average prices. Most prices are for April 2009 and some are for May, June, or for first quarter, 2009. ** Apartment Rents - HUD 2009 Fair Market Rents. Rents shown are for 2-bedroom units. Data Source: Arizona Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Realty Studies at ASU Polytechnic, various local real estate associations and local governments. 2009 General Trends in Arizona’s Housing Market Appendices Table 2: Employment Growth and Housing Affordability by Industry - Arizona Industry Mining Employment 2008 Employment Change 2001-2008 Numbers Employment Change 2001-2008 Percent Median Hourly Wages Statewide 2008 Can Afford to Buy Median Priced House Can Afford to Rent 2-BDRM Apartment 9,600 13,500 3,900 40.6% $20.90 No Yes Construction* 173,600 187,800 14,200 8.2% $16.59 No Yes Manufacturing 201,700 174,500 -27,200 -13.5% $18.39 No Yes Wholesale Trade 95,900 107,600 11,700 12.2% $17.45 No Yes 268,100 320,600 52,500 19.6% $11.30 No No Retail Trade (Retail store workers) Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 76,600 87,000 10,400 13.6% $18.48 No Yes Information (Publishing, motion pictures and videos, radio and TV stations, and telecommunications) 53,900 42,100 -11,800 -21.9% $19.08 No Yes 109,300 125,000 15,700 14.4% $18.00 No Yes Finance and Insurance 10 Employment 2001 Real Estate Rental and Leasing 44,100 51,000 7,000 15.9% $14.30 No No Professional and Business Services (Legal services, management services, computers services, accounting services, engineering services, payroll services) 319,900 385,500 65,600 20.5% $22.04 No Yes Educational Services (Businesses that provide educational services to schools, colleges, and universities plus specialized schools such as computer training, language schools, flight training, cosmetology) 28,300 45,200 16,900 59.7% $17.07 No Yes Health Care and Social Assistance 191,600 274,000 82,400 43.0% $15.16 No Yes Leisure and Hospitality 230,000 268,800 38,800 16.9% $10.64 No No 84,700 100,300 15,600 18.4% $12.78 No No 377,800 433,600 55,800 14.8% $19.51 No Yes 2,265,100 2,616,600 351,500 15.5% $14.87 No No Other Services (Auto repair shops, barber shops, other repair shops) Government - Federal, State and Local (All government employees including teachers, police) Total Employment NOTE: 2008 employment data are the average of January to December numbers. * The U.S. Department of Labor’s classification for the construction industry is comprised of residential construction, commercial construction, highway and bridge construction, and related activities. While residential construction in Arizona has almost stopped, commercial and highway construction and repairs have been going strong. Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing, Arizona Department of Commerce - Research Administration. Appendices Table 3: Employment Growth and Housing Affordability by Industry - Urban Arizona* Industry Mining Urban Employment 2001 Urban Employment 2008 Urban Urban Can Afford Hourly WagesCan Afford Employment Employment to Buy Maricopa to Rent Change Change Median County (for 2-BDRM 2001-2008 2001-2008 Priced Urban Arizona) Apartment Numbers Percent House 4,200 5,600 1,400 33.3% $19.81 Yes Yes Construction** 151,000 163,300 12,300 8.1% $17.04 No Yes Manufacturing 186,200 158,500 -27,700 -14.9% $18.25 No Yes Wholesale Trade 87,000 98,600 11,600 13.3% $18.06 No Yes 224,900 270,000 45,100 20.1% $11.52 No No Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 67,800 76,300 8,500 12.5% $18.35 No Yes Information (Publishing, motion pictures and videos, radio and TV stations and telecommunications) 49,300 36,700 -12,600 -25.6% $19.16 Yes Yes 110,900 119,400 8,500 7.7% $18.46 No Yes Retail Trade (Retail store workers) Finance and Insurance Real Estate Rental and Leasing 33,200 45,600 12,400 37.3% $14.78 No No Professional and Business Services (Legal services, management services, computers services, accounting services, engineering services, payroll services) 300,700 360,600 59,900 19.9% $22.08 Yes Yes Educational Services (Businesses that provide educational services to schools, colleges, and universities, plus specialized schools such as computer training, language schools, flight training, cosmetology) 30,200 48,400 18,200 60.3% $17.38 No Yes Health Care and Social Assistance 155,300 225,700 70,400 45.3% $15.42 No No Leisure and Hospitality 190,700 224,900 34,200 17.9% $10.94 No No 73,600 89,800 16,200 22.0% $12.87 No No 277,200 326,100 48,900 17.6% $20.48 Yes Yes 1,942,200 2,249,500 307,300 15.8% $15.15 No No Other Services (Auto repair shops, barber shops, other repair shops) Government - Federal, State and Local (All government employees including teachers, police) Total Employment Note 1: Maricopa County hourly wages by industry data was used as a substitute for the same category of data in the urban areas of Arizona. Note 2: 2008 employment data are the average of January to December numbers. Note 3: While the 2001 Total Employment number is the same as reported in 2008, there has been a redistribution among some industries. * Urban Arizona is defined as Metro Phoenix plus Metro Tucson. ** The U.S. Department of Labor’s classification for the construction industry is comprised of residential construction, commercial construction, highway and bridge construction, and related activities. While residential construction in Arizona has almost stopped, commercial and highway construction and repairs have been going strong. Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing and Arizona Department of Commerce. 11 Appendices Table 4: Employment Growth and Housing Affordability by Industry - Rural Arizona* Industry Mining Rural Rural Hourly Wages- Can Afford Rural Employment Employment Mohave Buying a Employment Change Change County (for Median2008 2001-2008 2001-2008 Rural Arizona) Priced House Numbers Percent Can Afford Renting a 2-BDRM Apartment 5,400 7,900 2,500 46.3% $18.68 No Yes Construction** 22,600 24,500 1,900 8.4% $15.54 No Yes Manufacturing 15,500 16,000 500 3.2% $14.87 No Yes Wholesale Trade 8,900 9,000 100 1.1% $14.38 No Yes 43,200 50,600 7,400 17.1% $10.86 No No Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 8,800 10,700 1,900 21.6% $16.77 No Yes Information (Publishing, motion pictures and videos, radio and TV stations and telecommunications) 4,600 5,400 800 17.4% $16.71 No Yes Finance and Insurance -1,600 5,600 7,200 -450% $15.52 No Yes Real Estate Rental and Leasing 10,900 5,500 -5,400 -49.5% $11.94 No No Professional and Business Services (Legal services, management services, computers services, accounting services, engineering services, payroll services) 19,200 24,900 5,700 29.7% $14.30 No No Educational Services (Businesses that provide educational services to schools, colleges and universities plus specialized schools such as computer training, language schools, flight training, cosmetology) -1,900 -3,200 -1,300 68.4% $15.16 No Yes Health Care and Social Assistance 36,300 48,300 12,000 33.1% $15.10 No Yes Leisure and Hospitality 39,300 43,900 4,600 11.7% $10.35 No No Other Services (Auto repair shops, barber shops, other repair shops) 11,100 10,500 -600 -5.4% $10.96 No No Government - Federal, State and Local (All government employees including teachers, police) 100,600 107,500 6,900 6.9% $17.63 No Yes Total Employment 322,900 367,100 44,200 13.7% $13.34 No No Retail Trade (Retail store workers) 12 Rural Employment 2001 Note 1: Mohave County hourly wages by industry data was used as a substitute for the same category of data in the rural areas of Arizona. Note 2: 2008 employment data are the average of January to December numbers. Note 3: While the 2001 Total Employment number is the same as reported in 2008, there has been a redistribution among some industries. * Rural Arizona is defined as Arizona minus Urban Arizona (Metro Phoenix plus Metro Tucson). ** The U.S. Department of Labor’s classification for the construction industry is comprised of residential construction, commercial construction, highway and bridge construction, and related activities. While residential construction in Arizona has almost stopped, commercial and highway construction and repairs have been going strong. Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing and Arizona Department of Commerce - Research Administration. Appendices Table 5: 1990, 2000 and 2007 Median Home Value and Household Income Data for Arizona and Counties Median Home Value County 1990 2000 2007 Median Home Value Increased Faster Than Median Household Income* Median Household Income % Increase 19902000 % Increase 20002007 1990 2000 2007 % Increase 19902000 % Increase 20002007 % Net Increase 1990 - 2000 % Net Increase 2000 - 2007 Apache $16,600 $41,700 $79,300 151.2% 90.2% $14,100 $23,344 $30,539 65.6% 30.8% 85.6% 59.3% Cochise $59,700 $88,200 $156,100 47.7% 77.0% $22,425 $32,105 $44,499 43.2% 38.6% 4.6% 38.4% Coconino $82,600 $142,500 $288,500 72.5% 102.5% $26,112 $38,256 $49,633 46.5% 29.7% 26.0% 72.7% Gila $58,600 $100,100 $135,500 70.8% 35.4% $20,964 $30,917 $34,989 47.5% 13.2% 23.3% 22.2% Graham $50,300 $80,900 $98,500 60.8% 21.8% $18,455 $29,668 $38,525 60.8% 29.9% 0.1% -8.1% Greenlee $40,700 $62,700 NA 54.1% NA $27,491 $39,384 NA 43.3% NA 10.8% NA La Paz $56,800 $86,500 $85,500 52.3% -1.2% $16,555 $25,839 $28,973 56.1% 12.1% -3.8% -13.3% Maricopa $84,700 $129,200 $268,900 52.5% 108.1% $30,797 $45,358 $54,730 47.3% 20.7% 5.3% 87.5% Mohave $74,900 $95,300 $204,600 27.2% 114.7% $24,002 $31,521 $39,991 31.3% 26.9% -4.1% 87.8% Navajo $51,500 $77,000 $126,900 49.5% 64.8% $19,452 $28,569 $40,190 46.9% 40.7% 2.6% 24.1% Pima $76,500 $114,600 $210,700 49.8% 83.9% $25,401 $36,758 $43,546 44.7% 18.5% 5.1% 65.4% Pinal $53,400 $93,900 $197,500 75.8% 110.3% $21,301 $35,856 $50,228 68.3% 40.1% 7.5% 70.2% Santa Cruz $71,500 $94,700 $131,100 32.4% 38.4% $22,066 $29,710 $45,034 34.6% 51.6% -2.2% -13.1% Yavapai $85,300 $138,000 $253,400 61.8% 83.6% $22,060 $34,901 $44,408 58.2% 27.2% 3.6% 56.4% Yuma $63,700 $85,100 $151,600 33.6% 78.1% $23,635 $32,182 $40,733 36.2% 26.6% -2.6% 51.6% State of Arizona $79,700 $121,300 $221,800 52.2% 82.9% $27,540 $40,558 $48,609 47.3% 19.9% 4.9% 63.0% Note 1: The American Community Survey data was used for the 2007 home value estimates and median household income numbers. Note 2: The 2007 data from American Community Survey is in 2007 inflation-adjusted dollars. Note 3: 2007 median household income and median home value for the counties of Gila, Graham, La Paz and Santa Cruz County are from ACS 2005-1007. * These numbers were derived by subtracting the percent increase in “median household income” from the percent increase in “median home values” for the 1990-2000 and 2000-2007 periods. Data Source: Arizona Department of Housing, U.S. Census Bureau (1990 and 2000 censuses), and 2007 American Community Survey. 13 2009 Arizona’s Housing Market . . . a glance. Enterprise Community Investments, Inc. Sources Arizona Department of Housing Arizona Association of REALTORS® Arizona Department of Commerce Realty Studies - ASU Polytechnic Chambers of Commerce and Local Governments Federal Finance Housing Agency Harvard University – Joint Center for Housing Studies MQ Consulting, LLC National Association of Homebuilders National Association of REALTORS® U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the programs of a public agency. Individuals with disabilities who need the information contained in this publication in an alternate format may contact the Arizona Department of Housing at (602) 771-1000 or our TTY number (602) 771-1001 to make their needs known. Requests should be made as soon as possible to allow sufficient time to arrange for the accommodation. Arizona Department of Housing 1110 W. Washington, Suite 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 771-1000 www.azhousing.gov The goal of the Arizona Department of Housing is to alleviate many of the issues raised in this document through strategic public investment and technical assistance. If you would like additional information, please contact: Michael Trailor, Director Arizona Department of Housing (602) 771-1000 Michael.Trailor@azhousing.gov