THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA 2014 ANNUAL REPORT (Final) David M. Parker Chairman Susan Strickler Vice Chair Michael G. Sanders Commissioner Joseph M. Hennelly, Jr. Commissioner Laura L. McGrory, Director “The Spirit of Arizona,” Mural Painting by Robert T. McCall © 1987 Industrial Commission of Arizona as Trustee for the Special Fund TABLE OF CONTENTS I. History of the Industrial Commission... ............................................................................1 II. Commission Duties and Responsibilities…......................................................................2 III. State of Programs… ..........................................................................................................3 A. Occupational Safety and Health… ...........................................................................3 1. Compliance… ....................................................................................................3 2. Consultation & Training… ................................................................................6 3. Boilers & Elevators… ........................................................................................8 4. Occupational Injury, Illness & Fatal Statistics… ............................................10 B. Payment of Wages… ............................................................................................12 1. Resolution of Wage Disputes….......................................................................12 2. Minimum Wage Law Enforcement… .............................................................12 C. Arizona Workers’ Compensation… ......................................................................14 1. Claims Statistics… ...........................................................................................14 2. Rates, Premiums and Losses… ........................................................................17 3. Injury & Illness Incident Rates… ....................................................................19 4. Special Fund Activity… ..................................................................................23 5. Adjudication of Disputes… .............................................................................27 6. Compliance with Workers' Compensation Insurance Laws… ........................29 IV. D. Youth Employment… ............................................................................................31 E. Licensed & Regulated Agencies… ........................................................................32 State of the Commission… .............................................................................................34 Appendix A: Arizona Occupational Injuries & Illnesses… ............................................................35 Appendix B: Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries… ........................41 HISTORY OF THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION The Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA” or “Commission”) is a regulatory agency that was created in 1925 as a result of legislation implementing the constitutional provisions establishing a worker’s compensation system. From 1925 to 1969, the workers’ compensation system consisted of the State Compensation Fund, which was then a part of the Industrial Commission, and self-insured employers which generally were the mining and the railroad companies. In 1969 the workers’ compensation system was reorganized and expanded to include private insurance companies. The State Compensation Fund was split off from the Industrial Commission and established as a separate agency responsible for providing worker’s compensation coverage. The Industrial Commission retained its responsibility as the file of record and its regulatory authority over the processing of workers’ compensation claims. Since that time, the role of the Industrial Commission has been expanded to cover other labor related issues such as occupational safety and health, youth employment laws, resolution of wage related disputes, minimum wage, vocational rehabilitation, and workers’ compensation coverage for claimants of uninsured employers, insolvent insurance carriers and self-insured employers. The policy setting body for the ICA is a five member Commission whose members are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate to staggered five years terms. As a non-general fund agency, the Industrial Commission’s Administrative Fund is funded by an annual assessment on workers’ compensation premiums that cannot exceed 3%. The Commission performs its statutory duties and responsibilities through the seven major Divisions that are described in this document. 1 Commission Duties and Responsibilities The Commission is responsible for administering and enforcing laws and regulations that relate to the protection of life, health, safety and welfare of employees within the State. These laws are found in Title 23 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. A five-member Commission is responsible for determining the policy of the Industrial Commission of Arizona. Each Commissioner is appointed by the Governor to a five-year staggered term. In addition to establishing the policy of the Commission, the Commissioners also perform a variety of other functions that include:           Approving the issuance of occupational safety and health citations with penalties in excess of $2,500; Approving the issuance of cease and desist orders and penalties for youth employment law violations; Promulgating agency rules; Authorizing and approving renewal of the self-insurance authority for individual employers and workers’ compensation pools; Licensing of employment agencies, career counseling services, and talent and modeling firms; Reviewing the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Physicians’ and Pharmaceutical Fee Schedule on an annual basis; Approving penalties for employers who fail to provide workers’ compensation insurance for their employees; Acting on requests from injured workers to commute their permanent monthly workers’ compensation awards to lump sum amounts; Acting on occupational safety and health discrimination complaints, and; Establishing the annual tax assessment rates on workers’ compensation premiums to fund the Administrative Fund and Special Fund. Commission meetings, except for Executive Sessions, are open to the public and subject to the open meeting laws. The time and location of each meeting are published in the agenda for that meeting. Agendas are published at least 24 hours in advance of each meeting and are available for download on The Industrial Commission of Arizona website at http://www.azica.gov/. Minutes are kept of each meeting and are also available for download on this web site or by contacting the Commission Secretary at (602) 542-4411. 2 STATE OF PROGRAMS A. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH In 1974, Governor Jack Williams asserted Arizona’s right under the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act to retain jurisdiction over occupational safety and health issues within our state, excluding mining operations, Indian reservations and federal employees. This jurisdiction encompasses approximately 2.3 million employees working in 144,000 public and private establishments. In accordance with the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“ADOSH”) operates under an approved plan with the U.S. Department of Labor. In 1985, the U.S. Department of Labor designated ADOSH as being one of only 27 states and territories that have programs that are “as effective” as Federal OSHA. ADOSH focuses its efforts in four specific areas: compliance, consultation, elevators and boilers. 1. Compliance ADOSH’s compliance sections focus on conducting unannounced inspections of workplaces throughout Arizona to determine whether employers are complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Act and standards. Inspections may be the result of (1) a work-related accident, (2) a complaint, (3) a referral, (4) a planned or targeted effort, or (5) a follow-up to ensure that previously cited serious, repeat or willful violations have been corrected. Inspections involving work-related accidents are generally serious in nature, involving multiple injuries or a fatality. A complaint inspection is generally the result of a serious safety/health allegation or an employer’s failure to respond to a written inquiry from ADOSH. A referral generally comes from another government source such as the Department of Economic Security’s Farm Worker Outreach Program, Department of Health Services, or police and fire departments. Planned or targeted inspections are those directed at those employers in high-hazard industries or who have a large number of workers’ compensation claims, or higher than average injury and illness rates. ADOSH is the only state or federal OSHA program in the country that has an independent body (the Commission) that is separate from the OSHA program that reviews the appropriateness of ADOSH’S proposed citations and either approves, modifies or disapproves their issuance. At a public meeting before the Commissioners, a representative from ADOSH presents a prima facie case to the Commissioners as to why a citation should be issued. The Commission, as a body, reviews the proposal and either approves, modifies, or disapproves the proposed citations based upon the facts presented. Current Commission policy is to review all cases where there are citations with penalties totaling more than $2,500.00. Penalties totaling $2,500.00 or less are approved by the ADOSH Director. All penalties assessed and collected go directly to the State General Fund. 3 The following represent statistics related to citations issued by ADOSH during the applicable state fiscal year. Number of Compliance Inspections Conducted 1,276 1,218 1,117 1,035 895 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Serious, Willful and Repeat Violations Issued 800 796 731 711 674 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 4 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Total Penalties Assessed $1,277,612 $768,330 FY 09/10 $827,814 $707,256 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 $763,864 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 It is important to note that not all violations noted in inspections result in penalties. In fact, the majorities of violations are “other than serious” and carry no penalty. In addition, for a significant number of inspections ADOSH finds no violations and determines that the employer is “in compliance” with the Arizona Occupational Safety and Health Act. Number of Non-Serious Violations Issued 2,450 2,271 2,060 1,680 1,239 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 5 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 In-Compliance Rate 50.0% 45.0% 43.2% 40.0% 35.0% 36.0% 36.9% FY 12/13 FY 13/14 31.6% 30.0% 26.5% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 2. Consultation and Training ADOSH’s consultation activities consist of providing free consultative assistance to employers who are requesting assistance in coming into compliance with existing occupational safety and health standards. At the request of an employer, a consultation evaluation may involve an individual operation or an entire workplace. No citations or penalties are issued to employers utilizing consultation services as long as the employer corrects the apparent hazards which are noted as written recommendations in a letter to the employer. The consultation department also oversees key outreach and partnership programs that help strengthen both public and private entity’s understanding of ADOSH’s mission and vision. The programs include the Voluntary Protection Program, the Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program, Partnerships and Alliances. Employers who have chosen to partner with ADOSH have seen injury and illnesses reduced dramatically below their industry average. Therefore the employer helps to improve workplace safety for all employees. Employers who want to work to improve their workplace or industry may contact the program manager to gain more information on the programs. Free training programs are also provided by ADOSH to business organizations, labor organizations and individual employers upon request. The following represent statistics related to consultation services provided by ADOSH during the applicable state fiscal year. 6 Hazards Found During Consultation Surveys 1,374 1,250 1,068 733 572 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Training Programs Conducted 299 293 291 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 230 194 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 Number of Employees Trained 6,966 FY 09/10 3,175 2,970 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 7 3,443 3,672 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Employers Trained 2,359 2,255 2,440 2,009 1,444 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 3. Boilers and Elevators Unlike the Arizona Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Boiler and Elevator programs are equipment oriented, and not based upon employee exposure. As a result, cease and desist orders are utilized without monetary penalties. Once violations are corrected, certificates of operation are issued allowing the employer to utilize the boiler, elevator or escalator. In the boiler and elevator statutes, political subdivisions are allowed to retain jurisdiction if they provide a comparable program. The City of Phoenix has retained jurisdiction over elevators within its boundaries. No other political subdivision has retained jurisdiction for boilers or elevators. Number of Boilers Inspected 4,688 4,079 3,247 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 8 3,439 3,567 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Boiler Deficiencies Identified 2,408 1,913 1,750 1,744 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 1,636 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 Number of Elevators Inspected 6,797 5,612 FY 09/10 5,790 FY 10/11 6,633 5,959 FY 11/12 9 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Elevators With Deficiencies 3,450 3,235 2,882 2,321 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 2,462 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 4. Occupational Injury, Illness & Fatal Statistics The Research and Statistics’ Division of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”), annually conducts the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (“CFOI”) and Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (“SOII”). The CFOI covers all fatal injuries determined to be work-related according to the CFOI criteria, regardless of industry or regulatory coverage of the establishment. Each fatality must be substantiated by at least two independent sources, which include death certificates, workers’ compensation reports, newspaper articles or medical examiners’ reports. The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses is sent out to a sample of employers throughout Arizona from selected industries. Employers are requested to provide work-related injury and illness information from the OSHA Forms 300 and 300A. In cases involving a more severe injury, additional detailed information will be requested for that particular injury or illness. States are responsible for data collection, follow-up, and coding for both the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. The survey also requires employers to report the annual average number of employees and total hours worked for all employees. This information is used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to produce incidence rates at the State and National level. In addition to the foregoing, the Research and Statistics Division also collects data from the Industrial Commission Supplemental Database System (“SDS”) of Arizona workers’ compensation claims to identify lost workday claims by major industry, nature of injury, body part injured, event or exposure, source of injury, and occupation. 10 In September 2010, the Bureau of Labor Statistics completed a major revision to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (“OIICS”). The revised OIICS structure (“OIICS 2.01”) will be used beginning with reference year 2011 for both the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (“CFOI”) and the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (“SOII”) programs. Because of the extensive revisions, data for the OIICS case characteristics for reference year 2011 represent a break in series with data for prior years. More information on OIICS can be found at www.bls.gov/iif/oshoiics.htm. As a result of the break in series, new survey ID’s have been created for the public IIF databases (www.bls.gov/iif/data.htm) for CFOI and SOII. The Standard Occupational Classification (“SOC”) system is used to classify occupations for both CFOI and SOII. Beginning with reference year 2011, a revised version of the SOC system will be used to classify occupations. While the changes to the new structure (“SOC 2010”) were not extensive, comparisons of SOC 2000 and SOC 2010 occupations should be made with caution. More information on the 2010 SOC, including an overview of new items in SOC 2010, can be found here: www.bls.gov/soc/home.htm. The North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) is used to classify industry for both CFOI and SOII. For reference year 2014, the CFOI and SOII programs will adopt a revised industry classification system, NAICS 2012, which will represent a break in series. More information on NAICS can be found here: www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm. For more information on the different coding structures used and the years to which they apply, please see the BLS Handbook of Methods at http://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homch9.pdf. The information obtained from either the CFOI, SOII, or the Commission’s SDS database can be used to identify hazardous industries, occupations, and activities. It also can assist in the development of safer workplaces and in the prevention of injuries. The injury and illness rates calculated based on the most recent surveys are found on pages 19-22. Fatality statistics are found in Appendix B. Appendix A includes the revised OIICS, SOC, and NAICS codes that have been implemented in the Commission’s SDS database. Appendix B reflects the revised OIICS, SOC, and NAICS codes that have been implemented for the fatal statistics beginning in 2011, as well as the former OIICS, SOC, and NAICS codes for fatality statistics ending in 2010. 11 B. PAYMENT OF WAGES The Arizona Labor Department (“Department”) is responsible for the enforcement of Arizona’s payment of wages and minimum wage law. See A.R.S. §23-350 et seq. and 23-363 et seq. Information related to these areas is set forth below. 1. Resolution of Wage Disputes When wages owed to an employee are no more than $5,000 and the accrual of those unpaid wages do not exceed one year, an employee may file a wage claim with the Department. Upon receipt of a claim, the Department will notify the employer of the claim and investigate the allegations. The Department will provide a written determination which can be appealed to Superior Court. An employer who does not comply with a Final Order within ten days after the order becomes final is liable to pay the employee treble the amount of the unpaid wages found to be owed. While every effort is made to resolve the dispute, in some cases there is insufficient information to make a determination. In those cases, a claimant has the right to file a civil action in Justice or Small Claims Court. A claimant also has the right to file their initial wage claim in the appropriate Court. Number of Wage Claims Filed 2,896 2,729 2,577 2,570 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 2,514 FY 09/10 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 2. Minimum Wage Law Enforcement Arizona employers are required to pay employees no less than the minimum wage. Any person may file an administrative complaint with the Department if they are not receiving the state minimum wage or have been retaliated against for asserting any claim or right under the Arizona Minimum Wage Act (“MW Act”). Upon receipt of an alleged violation, the Department will notify the concerned employer and investigate the allegations. Civil penalties may be assessed for violations of 12 the MW Act. Upon determination that wages or penalties are due and unpaid to the employee, the Department may obtain judgment and execution, garnishment, attachments, or other remedies for collection. The Department will provide a written determination, which can be appealed to the Administrative Law Judge Division of the Commission. The Department may mediate and conciliate any dispute between the parties. Additional information regarding the Arizona Minimum Wage and the minimum wage in effect for the current year may be found at the Commission’s website at http://www.azica.gov/. Number of Minimum Wage Complaints Filed 33 31 28 27 25 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 13 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 C. ARIZONA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Since 1925, the Industrial Commission of Arizona has been the file of record for all Arizona workers’ compensation claims. To date, the Commission maintains records for over 6 million workers’ compensation claims files, which translates to over 40 million documents being stored on the Commission’s imaging system and up to 6,000 documents being processed per day. Through its Claims Division, the Commission is actively involved in the processing of Arizona workers’ compensation claims to ensure that insurance carriers, third party processing agents, and self-insured employers (“payers”) are processing workers’ compensation claims in accordance with Arizona law. This includes notifying the appropriate payer of any claim that is received by the Claims Division from an attending physician or injured worker. This notification is done so that the payer can appropriately process the claim. The “active involvement” of the Claims Division also includes the making of determinations in an individual workers’ compensation claim. Numbering in the thousands per year, these determinations can include a variety of issues such as the setting of a worker’s average monthly wage, establishment of unscheduled permanent disability awards, awards for facial scarring and loss of teeth, processing requests to leave the state and requests to change physicians, and allegations of bad faith. Through its Ombudsman’s Office and other Claims Division staff, the Commission answers approximately 150,000 telephone/web inquiries per year. Though not providing legal advice, the Ombudsman’s Office is available to provide assistance to claimants to ensure they understand the Arizona workers’ compensation system and process. 1. Claims Statistics Number of Workers' Compensation Claims Filed 99,215 97,730 95,446 94,611 93,797 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 14 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Claims Frequency Per 100,000 Workers 5,253 4,348 3,873 Arizona Colorado Nevada 4,113 4,039 New Mexico Utah Source: National Council on Compensation Insurance, Statistical Plan data for policies ending in 2012 Claims Frequency of Lost Time Claims Per 100,000 Workers 1,075 975 915 702 662 Arizona Colorado Nevada New Mexico Utah Source: National Council on Compensation Insurance, Statistical Plan data for policies ending in 2012 15 Number of Average Monthly Awards Issued 13,843 13,881 13,577 13,236 12,994 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Loss In Earning Capacity Awards Issued 2,382 2,349 2,262 2,160 2,082 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 16 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 2. Rates, Premiums, and Losses    Arizona Premium Rate Index per $100 of Payroll: $1.60 (eff. 1/01/2014) 2014 Ranking: 37 (15th lowest out of 51 jurisdictions) Percent of National Median ($1.85): 86% $3.00 Range of Premium Rates $2.80 $2.60 AZ Workers Compensation Premium Rate Per $100 of Payroll $2.40 $2.20 $2.00 $1.77 $1.80 $1.73 $1.63 $1.67 $1.71 2008 2010 $1.61 $1.60 2012 2014 $1.49 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 2000 2002 2004 2006 Source: Oregon Workers’ Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Summary Reports, Oregon Department of Consumer & Business Rate Changes in Arizona 10 8.4 7.9 8 6 4.5 4.5 5.2 4.1 4 4 3.2 3.2 2.4 2 0.6 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan-08 Oct-08 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-14 Jan-15 -2 -4 -2.8 -3.1 -4.2 -6 -6 -8 Arizona’s voluntary cumulative rate level change since October 2000: -15.0% 17 CY Total Taxable Premium Written In Millions $1,133.56 $1,058.93 $923.50 $864.40 $773.00 2009 2010 $806.00 2011 2012 2013 2014 CY Total Direct Losses In Millions $581.39 $568.20 $558.70 $559.96 2012 2013 $544.70 $519.40 2009 2010 2011 18 2014 3. Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey of Occupational Injury and Illness Incident Rates * TRC: Total Recordable Cases ** Industry TRCR's by State 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't State TRCR's by Industry 8 7 National 6 AZ 5 CA 4 WA 3 OR 2 NV 1 NM 0 UT Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't National 3.3 3.9 5.7 AZ 3.3 3.0 5.3 CA 3.5 5.6 7.5 WA 4.8 3.6 6.6 OR 4.1 3.0 4.9 NV 4.0 3.7 5.8 NM 3.2 3.9 5.8 UT 3.4 2.2 4.8 19 Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey of Occupational Injury and Illness Incident Rates * DART: Cases with days away from work, job transfer, or restriction ** Sector DART'S by State 4 3.5 3 2.5 Private Industry 2 1.5 State Gov't 1 Local Gov't 0.5 0 State DART'S by Sector 4 National 3.5 3 AZ 2.5 CA 2 WA 1.5 OR 1 NV 0.5 NM 0 UT Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't National 1.7 2.1 2.4 AZ 1.9 1.8 2.3 CA 2.1 2.9 3.5 WA 2.5 1.8 3.1 OR 2.2 1.7 2.6 NV 2.1 1.3 2.6 NM 1.5 1.8 2.6 UT 1.6 .6 1.3 20 Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey of Occupational Injury and Illness Incident Rates * Lost Time Rate: Cases with days away from work ** Industry Lost Time Cases by State 3 2.5 2 Private Industry 1.5 State Gov't 1 Local Gov't 0.5 0 State Lost Time Cases by Industry 3 National 2.5 AZ 2 CA 1.5 WA OR 1 NV 0.5 NM 0 Private Industry State Gov't UT Local Gov't Private Industry State Gov't Local Gov't National 1.0 1.6 1.7 AZ .9 1.4 1.1 CA 1.1 2.0 2.3 WA 1.6 1.4 2.5 OR 1.4 1.3 2.0 NV 1.0 .5 1.6 NM .9 1.1 1.3 UT .8 .4 1.0 21 Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey of Occupational Injury and Illness Incident Rates * Restricted Rate: Cases with transfer or restriction ** Industry Transfer/Restriction Rate by State 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 Private Industry 0.6 State Gov't 0.4 Local Gov't 0.2 0 State Transfer/Restriction Rate by Industry 1.4 National 1.2 AZ 1 CA 0.8 WA 0.6 OR 0.4 NV 0.2 NM 0 Private Industry National AZ CA WA OR NV NM UT State Gov't Local Gov't Private Industry .7 1.0 1.0 1.0 .8 1.1 .6 .8 State Gov't .5 .4 .9 .4 .4 .7 .7 .1 UT Local Gov't .7 1.2 1.3 .5 .6 1.0 1.3 .3 *Source: Incident Rates from Table 6, Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses by Industry, 2013, Bureau of Labor Statistics **TRCR, DART, Lost Time, and Restricted Rates - Rates per 100 Employees 22 4. Special Fund Activity Serving as the “safety net” for the Arizona Workers’ compensation system, the Special Fund is a “trust fund” that was legislatively created in 1969 for the express purpose of providing workers’ compensation benefits in the following areas:      Providing benefits for uninsured claimants Continuing workers’ compensation benefits for claimants of insolvent carriers and bankrupt self-insured employers under A.R.S. §23-966 Partial coverage of workers’ compensation benefits for second injury claims (apportionment) Vocational rehabilitation benefits Continuing medical benefits for pre 1973 workers’ compensation claims The Special Fund consists of monies from Special Fund assessments, property and securities acquired by the use of monies in the Fund, interest earned on monies in the Fund, and other monies derived from the sale, use or lease of property belonging to the Fund. Effective August 12, 2005, unexpended Administrative Fund revenue surplus may be transferred to the Special Fund when the Special Fund is not actuarially sound. The financial integrity of the Special Fund is overseen by a legislatively created Investment Committee that was established in 1984 under A.R.S. §23-1065. a. Special Fund Assessment Rate and Revenue   The maximum assessment rate allowed under the applicable statutes is 2.5%. Currently set at less than the maximum, the assessment rate for the Special Fund is .75% for calendar year 2015. This rate includes the .58% assessment authorized under A.R.S. §23-1065(A), the .17% assessment authorized under A.R.S. §23-1065(F), and the .00% assessment authorized under A.R.S. §23-966 (D). Revenue generated for CY 2014: $19,753,566.00. Historical Perspective of Special Fund Rates: 1993 to 2003: zero 2005 to 2007: 2.5% 2008 and 2009: 1.5% 2010 to 2012: 2.5% 2013: 2.25% 2014: 1.75% 2015: .75% b. Special Fund Actuarial Picture  Total liabilities estimated as of 6-30-14: $537.2 million (an increase of $1.8 million from prior year) 23   Special Fund total assets as of 6-30-14: $580.9 million (an increase of $62.5 million from prior year) Actuarial surplus estimated as $43.7 million with an 80% confidence level (an increase of $60.7 million from the prior year) To meet the reporting needs of our stakeholders, the Commission expects to publish an audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Special Fund. The first report is expected to be published in 2015. Previously, such financial statements were only issued as a component of the State’s CAFR. c. Processing of No Insurance Claims The Special Fund is responsible for providing workers’ compensation benefits to injured workers whose employers have violated the law by not providing workers’ compensation insurance. These workers’ compensation claims are called “no insurance claims.” Number of Claims Notified to the No Insurance Section 642 FY 09/10 511 514 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 24 501 499 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 d. Liability for Apportionment Under A.R.S. 23-1065(F) Total Actuarial Liability for Apportionment In Millions $94.1 $94.3 $93.0 June 30,2012 ** June 30,2013 ** June 30,2014 ** $83.2 $74.1 June 30,2010 * June 30,2011 ** *Reported at a 75% confidence level **Reported at an 80% confidence level e. Processing of Insolvency/Bankrupt Claims Under A.R.S. §23-966 Until June 30, 2015, the Special Fund is responsible for continuing workers’ compensation benefits for claimants insured by insolvent carriers. After that date, the Special Fund will only be responsible for continuing workers’ compensation benefits for claimants insured by bankrupt selfinsured employers. The following are the estimated reserves, excluding a 9.0% administrative fee, as of June 30, 2014, for those claims:             Atlantic Insurance Company Fremont Companies Great States & HIH Insurance Companies Home Insurance Company Legion & Villanova Insurance Companies Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company Mission Companies Park Avenue Insurance Company Paula Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Company Superior Companies Western Employers Insurance Company $5.9 million 97.8 million 20.9 million 6.2 million 19.0 million 14.6 million 10.4 million 4.1 million 11.8 million 17.8 million 11.3 million 3.8 million 25  All Other Ins. Carriers & Self-Insured Employers 9.1 million Total of All Claims $236.1 million Total Actuarial Liability for Claims Under A.R.S. 23-966 In Millions * $241.0 $238.6 $239.0 $238.9 June 30, 2012 ** June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 $220.5 June 30, 2010 ** June 30, 2011 ** *Includes reimbursement owed for that current fiscal year under A.R.S. §23-966 **Information updated from prior Annual Reports f. Vocational Rehabilitation If certain criteria are met, a workers’ compensation claimant may be eligible for vocational rehabilitation benefits. This rehabilitation program is focused on providing vocational retraining that will result in meaningful employment. This training may include a variety of college courses to supplement prior education and on the job training where the Special Fund will pay 50% of the salary during training (as long as there is a commitment to hire the trainee). Examples of past vocational programs provided include bilingual tractor-trailer operator, equine instructor, forensics, mortuary science, computer-aided drafting, and pharmacy technician. For those that are eligible for vocational rehabilitation, but are lacking skills to enter a program, the Special Fund offers foundational training in math, reading, and English (ESL). 26 Number of Vocational Awards Issued 170 128 132 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 136 125 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 5. Adjudication of Disputes The ALJ Division is the administrative tribunal of the Industrial Commission. Its mission is to resolve all disputes coming before it efficiently and equitably. The ALJ Division has jurisdiction over disputes that arise under the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OSHA”), and the Arizona Minimum Wage Act. It is also authorized to resolve disputes referred from the Department of Labor in the area of youth employment. Number of WC Cases Referred to ALJ Division * 7,087 7,080 6,965 6,879 6,472 FY 09/10 ** FY 10/11 ** FY 11/12 ** 27 FY 12/13 ** FY 13/14 Number of ADOSH Cases Referred to ALJ Division 54 51 49 FY 09/10 ** FY 10/11 ** 49 49 FY 11/12 ** FY 12/13 ** FY 13/14 Number of Minimum Wage Cases Referred to ALJ Division 3 FY 09/10 0 0 0 0 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Awards Issued by ALJ Division Involving Compromise and Settlement Agreements 1,514 1,502 1,463 FY 12/13 ** FY 13/14 1,397 1,259 FY 09/10 ** FY 10/11 ** FY 11/12 ** 28 Number of Hearings Held by ALJ Division 5,577 5,190 5,175 4,989 4,692 FY 09/10 ** FY 10/11 ** FY 11/12 ** FY 12/13 ** FY 13/14 *Includes all requests for investigation under A.R.S. §23-1061(J) for which a carrier response has been requested. **Information updated from prior Annual Reports 6. Compliance with Workers’ Compensation Insurance Laws The Commission has authority to enforce the law requiring that employers provide workers’ compensation insurance to their employees. A variety of sources notify the Commission of employers who may be violating Arizona law by not providing workers’ compensation coverage for their employees. Through its Legal Division, the Commission investigates these referrals, educates employers, initiates civil penalties against employers and, as a last resort, pursues enforcement actions in Superior Court that may result in the Superior Court issuing an injunction prohibiting the employer from conducting business unless the employer obtains the appropriate insurance. Number of Coverage Referrals 3,615 3,000 2,421 2,046 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 29 2,243 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Civil Penalties Issued 241 167 137 126 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 183 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Injunction Proceedings Initiated 95 63 60 59 38 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Employers Insured Through Compliance Efforts 426 313 258 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 244 FY 11/12 30 258 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 D. YOUTH EMPLOYMENT Arizona’s youth employment laws, which establish the hours a youth can work and prohibit occupations in which they can be employed, are very similar to those on the federal level. The State Labor Department utilizes information gathered from the Commission’s Claims Division to review and investigate workers’ compensation claims involving minors. It also receives and investigates information from other governmental organizations and complaints filed by the public concerning allegations of youth labor violations. Number of Injury Reports Involving Minors 451 457 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 402 FY 09/10 356 349 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 Number of Confirmed Youth Employment Violations 5 5 2 1 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 1 FY 11/12 31 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 E. LICENSED AND REGULATED AGENCIES Under Arizona Law, private employment agencies that charge a fee to an applicant are required to be licensed and regulated by the Labor Department. The Labor Department investigates the background of each firm applying for a license. Based on this investigation, the Industrial Commission’s Employment Advisory Council recommends approval or denial of a license to the Commission. The Commission administratively approves or denies the license. An appeal of that administrative decision may be made before the five-member Commission through an administrative hearing. The Commission’s decision is appealable to the Superior Court. Number of Career Counseling Firms 26 24 24 24 22 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Model & Talent Agencies 25 25 24 23 21 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 32 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of General Agencies 1 1 1 1 1 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Sitter/Nanny Agencies 2 FY 09/10 2 FY 10/11 1 1 1 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 Number of Licensed Agencies 53 51 51 50 45 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 33 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 IV. State of the Commission The Commission is a self-supporting, non-general fund agency whose operations and other statutorily mandated function is funded through an annual tax on workers’ compensation premiums. The Administrative Fund (established under A.R.S. § 23-1081(A)) provides for the Commission’s expenses in carrying out its powers and duties under Title 23, while the Special Fund (established under A.R.S. § 23-1065(A)) provides for other statutorily mandated functions (which is described in Section IV (C) (4) of this Report). The gradual improvement in Arizona’s economy is reflected in the Commission’s tax rate decreases and revenue increases. The following provides a brief overview of the operations of the Commission: A. Appropriated Budget FY 14/15: $20.0 million B. Administrative Fund Assessment Rate and Revenue:   Currently set below the 3.0% maximum allowed under A.R.S. § 23-961, the assessment rate for the Administrative Fund is 1.50% for calendar year 2015. Historical Perspective of Rates and Revenues: Calendar Year Rate 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 1.75% 2.75% 3.0% 3.0% 2.65% 3.0% Revenue in Millions $19.8 $29.1 $27.7 $24.2 $20.5 $25.9 % Change from Prior Year -32.08% +4.97% +14.64% +17.97% -21.06% -14.82% C. Legislatively Mandated Transfers from Administrative Fund to State General Fund:      FY 13/14: FY 12/13: FY 11/12: FY 10/11: FY 09/10: $0 $0 $426,700 $4.3 million $3.7 million D. Full Time Employees at CY 2014: 270 FTEs, including 34.4 Federally funded FTEs 34 Appendix A Arizona Occupational Injuries & Illnesses * Lost Workday Claims by Major Industry * 9000 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 8000 Construction 7000 Finance & Insurance 6000 Manufacturing 5000 4000 Mining, Quarrying, & Oil & Gas Extraction 3000 Other Services (except Public Administration) Retail Trade 2000 Transportation & Warehousing 1000 Wholesale Trade 0 2011 2012 Industry Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Construction Finance & Insurance Manufacturing Mining, Quarrying, & Oil & Gas Extraction Other Services (except Public Administration) Retail Trade Transportation & Warehousing Wholesale Trade All Other Industries 35 2011 2012 211 1,016 94 577 95 321 1,457 1,020 518 5,524 226 1,142 114 646 81 356 1,656 953 697 8,287 Lost Workday Claims by Nature * 7000 6000 Sprains, Strains 5000 Fractures Cuts, Lacerations 4000 Bruises Heat Burns Chemical Burns 3000 Amputations Carpal Tunnel 2000 Multiple Traumatic Injuries All Other Nature 1000 0 2011 2012 Nature 2011 2012 Sprains, Strains Fractures Cuts, Lacerations Bruises Heat Burns Chemical Burns Amputations Carpal Tunnel Multiple Traumatic Injuries All Other Nature 2,776 955 654 770 83 17 38 30 31 5,479 4,693 1,087 781 805 83 20 60 37 45 6,547 36 Lost Workday Claims by Part * 4000 3500 Head Neck 3000 Back Shoulder 2500 Arm Hand 2000 Wrist Knee 1500 Ankle Foot 1000 Body Systems Multiple Parts 500 All Other Parts 0 2011 2012 Part 2011 2012 Head Neck Back Shoulder Arm Hand Wrist Knee Ankle Foot Body Systems Multiple Parts All Other Parts 420 214 1,944 1,065 508 1,367 485 1,434 501 516 70 768 1,541 458 209 2,068 1,264 389 1,475 577 1,643 625 440 62 1,047 3,901 37 Lost Workday Claims by Event or Exposure * 6000 Contact w/Objects & Equipment 5000 Falls, Slips, Trips 4000 Overexertion & Bodily Reaction Exposure to Harmful Substance or Environment 3000 Transportation Incidents Fires & Explosions 2000 Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animal 1000 All Other Events 0 2011 2012 Event Contact w/Objects & Equipment Falls, Slips, Trips Overexertion & Bodily Reaction Exposure to Harmful Substance or Environment Transportation Incidents Fires & Explosions Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animal All Other Events 38 2011 2012 2,307 1,800 4,257 202 684 41 441 1,101 2,550 3,085 4,864 219 586 32 533 2,289 Lost Workday Claims by Source * 3500 3000 Chemicals & Chemical Products Containers, Furnitures & Fixtures 2500 Machinery Parts & Materials 2000 Persons, Plants, Animals & Minerals 1500 Structures & Surfaces Tools, Instruments & Equipment 1000 Vehicles All Other Sources 500 0 2011 2012 Source Chemicals & Chemical Products Containers, Furniture & Fixtures Machinery Parts & Materials Persons, Plants, Animals, & Minerals Structures & Surfaces Tools, Instruments, & Equipment Vehicles All Other Sources 39 2011 2012 61 1,652 549 755 2,779 2,235 829 1,020 953 52 2,106 512 828 3,281 2,279 938 1,120 3,042 Lost Workday Claims by Occupation * 7000 6000 Construction & Extraction Occupations Installation, Maintenance & Repair Service Occupations 5000 Protective Service Occupations 4000 Healthcare Occupations Food Preparation & Serviung Occupations 3000 Building & Ground Cleaning & Maintenance Occupations 2000 Transportation & Material Moving Occupations All Other Occupations 1000 0 2011 2012 Occupations Construction & Extraction Occupations Installation, Maintenance & Repair Service Occupations Protective Service Occupations Healthcare Occupations Food Preparation & Serving Occupations Building & Ground Cleaning & Maintenance Occupations Transportation & Material Moving Occupations All Other Occupations *Source: Supplemental Data System, Industrial Commission of Arizona 40 2011 979 918 865 1,124 605 710 2,349 3,283 2012 1,159 1,041 951 1,338 748 848 2,330 5,743 Appendix B Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Total Fatal Occupational Injuries - Arizona 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 TOTAL 2005 (F) 2006 (F) 2007 (F) 2008 (F) 2009 (F) 2010 (F) 99 112 97 100 76 77 2011(F) 69 2012 (F) 2013 (P) 60 90 (F) - Final (P) - Preliminary SOURCE: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational 41 Fatal Occupational Injuries by Event or Exposure ** 35 30 Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals 25 Contact w/Objects & Equipment 20 Falls, Slips, Trips Exposure to Harmful Substances/Environment 15 Transportation Incidents 10 Fires & Explosions 5 0 2011 2012 2013 Contact w/Objects & Equipment Falls, Slips, Trips Exposure to Harmful Substances/Environment Transportation Incidents Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals Fires & Explosions 2011 13 6 31 14 - 2012 2013 7 8 7 13 4 5 25 24 15 25 19 *Note: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. Data for 2013 are preliminary. Data for all other years are revised and final. Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Dashes indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. NEC means "not elsewhere classified." CFOI fatal injury counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. **Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. 42 Arizona Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2009-2010 Fatal Occupational Injuries by Event or Exposure ** 35 30 Contact w/Objects 25 Falls 20 Exposure to Harmful Substances/Environment 15 Transportation Incidents 10 Assaults and Violent Acts Fires & Explosions 5 0 2009 2010 Contact w/Objects Falls Exposure to Harmful Substances/Environment Transportation Incidents Assaults and Violent Acts Fires & Explosions 2009 12 11 11 32 10 - 2010 8 9 8 28 24 - *Note: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. Data for 2013 are preliminary. Data for all other years are revised and final. Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Dashes indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. NEC means "not elsewhere classified." CFOI fatal injury counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. **Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. 43