JLBC - Monthly Fiscal Highlights 1716 W. Adams Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: (602) 926-5491 Fax: (602) 926-5416 www.azleg.gov/jlbc.htm “Year-to-date, revenues are $7.2 million above forecast.” June 2010 Summary May General Fund revenues totaled $485.1 million and continued the positive gain in collections that began last month. Excluding revenue sharing and adjustments, base revenues grew by 5.6% above the May 2009 level. The May increase follows a 4.1% increase in April. See Tables 1 and 5 for more details on May General Fund revenues. Budget Projections – In April, JLBC Staff projected a FY 2010 shortfall of $(150) million and a FY 2011 shortfall of $(368) million to $(1.2) billion. (See the June 3rd JLBC Staff Budget Status Update for a slideshow presentation of this issue). These estimates will next be updated in July after Fiscal Year-end 2010 revenue numbers become available. May revenues exceeded the forecast by $42.5 million. Year-to-date, revenues are (11.0)% below FY 2009, but are $7.2 million above the forecast. The last time the State was above the year-to-date forecast in May was FY 2006. The potential FY 2011 shortfall consisted of approximately 3 different $400 million elements: May 2010 General Fund spending was $257.1 million. May expenditures were higher than the prior year in part due to technical revisions. Without this technical change, spending would have declined $(95.4) million. Year-to-date spending is ($1.2) billion less than the prior year. Fiscal year-to-date, General Fund revenues are $6.60 billion compared to spending of $7.68 billion for a shortfall of $(1.08) billion. This shortfall is less than April’s $(1.30) billion. Budget News This Monthly Fiscal Highlight includes information on budget projections, state borrowing, the asset sale/leaseback and a new federal health insurance regulation grant. • Revenue shortfall. With the growth in April and May revenues, however, the revenue shortfall seems less likely to occur at this time. The higher revenue growth would also potentially eliminate any FY 2010 shortfall. • No extended enhanced federal match rate. Contingent upon Congressional approval, these extra federal funds would help pay for the continuation of the Proposition 204 program through the end of FY 2011. As of this writing, Congress has yet to approve these funds. The most recent U.S. House omnibus bill did not include the provision. While the U.S. Senate Majority leadership is supportive of the extension, the bill is still being filibustered in the Senate as concerns grow over the federal deficit. The most recent version of the legislation would potentially reduce the State’s share of additional funding by one-third. Table of Contents Summary Summary of Recent Agency Reports • Budget News……………..…............................... 1 • AHCCCS – Report on SAVE Program .............. 9 • Economic Estimates Commission - BSF ........... 9 May Revenues ........................................................ 3 This report has been prepared for the Arizona Legislature by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee Staff on June 24, 2010 Economic Indicators .............................................. 6 JCCR Meeting Summary • SFB – $100 Million Lease-Purchase ................... 9 • Game & Fish – Shooting Range ....................... 9 May Spending....................................................... 10 2 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Summary (continued) Table 1 May Year-to-Date • “In the last week, the operating balance has had a positive balance of over $600 million.” General Fund Revenues ($ in Millions) FY 2010 Difference From Difference Collections Budget Forecast From FY 2009 $ 485.1 $42.5 $ 27.3 $6,604.1 $ 7.2 $ (234.4) Failure of the November ballot propositions concerning “First Things First” and the Land Conservation Fund. These 2 ballot propositions would: 1) Repeal First Things First and transfer the agencies remaining fund balance to the General Fund and shift the ongoing tobacco tax revenues to the General Fund; 2) Transfer any unexpended monies in the Land Conservation Fund to the General Fund. Since April, a new potential shortfall issue has developed. The Arizona Department of Education (ADE) recently provided an update regarding its FY 2010 budget status. ADE estimates that it will experience a $(31) million net funding shortfall for formula programs for FY 2010. That estimate would be $(80) million, however, apart from a $49 million adjustment for federal “State Fiscal Stabilization Fund” monies budgeted for FY 2011 that ADE instead used to address a portion of its FY 2010 funding shortfall. State Borrowing – In the beginning of June, the Treasurer continued daily borrowing in order to pay state obligations. Since then, the overall financial picture has subsequently improved and daily borrowing has not been necessary. The improved cash flow was due to a combination of increased revenues related to cash deposits from the recent lottery securitization and asset sale/leaseback, along with decreased spending due to payments being deferred to the next fiscal year. In the last week, the operating balance has had a positive balance of over $600 million. Based on informal discussions with the Treasurer’s Office and the General Accounting Office, the state’s positive operating balance is expected to continue until September. At that time, the state is projected to run a negative balance as $1.3 billion in rollover payments to K-12, the Universities, and other agencies come due. ADE’s FY 2011 General Fund budget was reduced by $(93) million with the intent that $93 million of stabilization funds would offset that reduction. With $49 million being used in FY 2010, only $44 million will be backfilled in FY 2011. All education related stabilization funds have been allocated. On June 9, the State Loan Commission met to discuss 2 items related to overnight borrowing: an extension of the existing borrowing agreement with Bank of America, and setting the interest rate the state would pay on overnight borrowing. The Commission took no action on either item. In FY 2011, ADE’s budget could face a shortfall of up to $130 million. This shortfall estimate is speculative and will ultimately depend on final FY 2010 student counts and preliminary FY 2011 student counts, which will not be available until this fall. The estimate includes: Without some action by the Commission, the state will not have the authority for any overnight borrowing after the start of the new fiscal year. In September, there will be at least 3 options to deal with the projected negative operating balance: sign a new commercial lending contract, resume borrowing from internal funds, or issue IOUs. • • • $31 million carryover shortfall from FY 2010. $49 million stabilization fund shortfall in FY 2011, due to using these funds to address the FY 2010 shortfall. $50 million for incorporating the higher than expected FY 2010 base into the FY 2011 formula. The other $30 million of the $80 million FY 2010 shortfall is anticipated to be one-time. See the JLBC Staff Analysis of State Borrowing for additional information. Asset Sale/Leaseback and Lottery Revenue Bonds – In late May, the State completed the issuance of $450 million of lottery revenue bonds at a yield of approximately 4.27%. In early June, the state completed the issuance of an additional $300 million of certificates of 3 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Summary (continued) participation for the asset sale/ leaseback of state properties at a yield of 4.38%. Funds from these issuances are anticipated to be deposited into the General Fund before the end of FY 2010, as assumed by the budget. Health Insurance Regulation Grants - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires states to provide increased oversight of health insurance plans. On June 8th, the federal government announced the availability of $51.0 million in grants to help states review health insurance premium increases, provide information to the federal government, and establish centers to analyze and distribute information to the public. The state would receive $1.0 million if its application is approved and would not have to provide matching funds. In future years, the federal government will make an additional $199.0 million available to states. May Revenues “Contracting continued its poor performance, with a (19.2)% decrease compared to May of last year, while the retail category was almost flat compared to last year, decreasing by (0.1)%.” Sales Tax collections were $277.3 million in May. Collections were down (0.6)% compared to last May and were $(10.7) million below the forecast. As noted last month, April broke a string of 26 consecutive months of year-overyear reductions. However, April’s increase was at least partially due to the collection of sales tax which was due in prior months. Adjusting for the prior months’ collections, April revenues were about equal to April of last year. May collections continue that trend, with collections approximately equal to May of the prior year. Table 2 displays the May growth rates for the largest categories. Table 2 May (0.1)% (19.2)% (2.0)% 4.6% 4.3% Individual Income Tax net revenues were $160.0 million in May. Collections were $48.8 million above the forecast. Year-to-date collections are down by (6.2)%. As indicated in Table 3 below, withholding tax payments increased by 5.1% in May, the fourth consecutive month of increase after 16 months of declines. Table 3 Sales Tax Growth Rates Compared to Prior Year Retail Contracting Utilities Use Restaurant & Bar data) compared to the prior year. The motor vehicle category is down (4.6)% through April. The Motor Vehicle category continues to improve each month from the (33)% decline for all of FY 2009 (see Table 4 below). Individual Income Tax Growth Rates Compared to Prior Year YTD (7.4)% (38.3)% 0.5% (9.6)% (1.2)% As noted in previous months, retail and contracting together account for about 30% of all sales tax revenues. Contracting continued its poor performance, with a (19.2)% decrease compared to May of last year, while the retail category was almost flat compared to last year, decreasing by (0.1)%. Within the retail category, General Merchandise and Miscellaneous Retail are down (2.5)% through April (the latest available Withholding Estimated + Final Payments Refunds May 5.1% (53.5)% YTD (2.3)% (22.5)% (41.1)% (8.4)% The May positive variance from the forecast is due primarily to reduced refunds for the month, which were down more than (40)% compared to the prior year. This May gain, combined with the large gain from April noted last month, brings the total gain relative to the forecast for refunds to $82.7 million for the year. Year-to-date, for this year’s tax filing season, (January through May), estimated and final payments are down over (18)% compared to 4 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 May Revenues Table 4 (Continued) April Taxable Retail Sales by Subcategory General/Misc. Merchandise Motor Vehicles/Misc. Auto. Bldg Materials and Supplies Food and Liquor Stores Furniture, Home Furnishings Clothing and Accessories Manufacturing Other Subcategories Total “Year-to-date, total HURF collections of $1.09 billion are down $(51.5) million or (4.5)% compared to last year.” % of Total 31.2% 20.0% 7.4% 7.5% 6.9% 5.8% 5.5% 15.7% 100.0% % Change From ’09 YTD (2.5)% (4.6)% (6.7)% (5.7)% (11.0)% (6.5)% (17.4)% (20.8)% (8.4)% the same period in the prior year. However, this decrease is more than offset by a decrease in refunds for the same period of over (11)%. Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) revenues consist of gasoline and use fuel (diesel) tax, motor carrier fees (commercial carriers), vehicle license tax and registration fees, and various other fees. Corporate Income Tax net collections were $51.4 million in May. This amount was $11.3 million above the forecast for the month. Approximately $10.0 million of May collections were erroneously included in May collections due to a technical error and were removed the first week of June. The $11.3 positive forecast variance reflects an adjustment for that technical correction. Year-to-date, corporate collections are (34.9)% below last year. HURF collections of $99.1 million in May were up $6.0 million or 6.5% compared to May of last year. However, May 2009 HURF collections were reduced due to a technical correction. Adjusting for this correction, May 2010 collections were approximately equal to May of the prior year. Year-to-date, total HURF collections of $1.09 billion are down $(51.5) million or (4.5)% compared to last year. The Lottery Commission reports that May ticket sales were $49.7 million, which is 7.2% above sales last year. Year-to-date, ticket sales are $60.9 million or 13.7% above last year. While ticket sales have increased, distributions to state beneficiaries are down $(3.2) million. As we have noted in previous months, it appears that sales have increased as prize payouts have increased (which reduces payments to state beneficiaries). Non-General Funds Tobacco Tax revenues were $29.8 million in May. Collections were up 7.5% compared to the prior year. Year-to-date collections are down by (11.7)%. Less than 10% of tobacco taxes are deposited directly into the General Fund. The remainder primarily goes to AHCCCS and the Department of Health Services (DHS) to defray the General Fund cost of operating those programs. 5 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Table 5 State of Arizona General Fund Revenue: Change from Previous Year and Enacted Budget Forecast May 2010 Current Month FY 2010 YTD (Eleven Months) Change From Actual May 2009 May 2010 Percent Amount Change from Actual Forecast Amount Percent May 2009 May 2010 Amount Forecast Percent Amount Percent Taxes Sales and Use $277,349,504 ($1,540,274) $3,134,813,513 ($365,861,920) (10.5) % ($24,773,999) 159,976,798 61,433,098 62.3 48,841,444 43.9 2,145,750,846 (142,593,300) (6.2) 23,418,254 51,427,886 2,495,782 5.1 11,254,127 28.0 322,643,556 (172,976,682) (34.9) 18,327,535 6.0 Property 2,744,174 334,289 13.9 1,533,174 126.6 16,726,693 1,913,193 12.9 2,149,466 14.7 Luxury - Tobacco 2,605,560 346,211 15.3 (209,440) (7.4) 23,916,044 (3,384,132) (12.4) (2,956,665) (11.0) 2,342,499 98,141 4.4 32,499 1.4 26,224,466 (325,370) (1.2) (983,541) (3.6) (6.8) 333,153,455 2,493,653 0.8 4,222,162 -- 358,995 148,623 70.6 25,611 7.7 (27.6) 1,415,797 287,538 25.5 813,888 135.2 Income - Individual - Corporate - Liquor Insurance Premium Estate Other Taxes Sub-Total Taxes 25,947,909 0 20,990 $522,415,320 (4,359,806) 0 (28,481) $58,778,960 (0.6) % ($10,706,639) (14.4) (1,887,091) -- 0 (57.6) (8,010) 12.7 % $48,850,064 (3.7) % 10.3 % $6,005,003,365 ($680,298,397) (10.2) % (71.5) 31,000,000 (2,007,500) (6.1) 16.8 23,959,990 (6,572,862) (21.5) 464,961 (19,056,070) (97.6) $20,242,711 (0.8) % 1.1 1.3 0.3 % Other Revenue Lottery License, Fees and Permits Interest Sales and Services Other Miscellaneous Disproportionate Share Transfers and Reimbursements Sub-Total Other Revenue TOTAL BASE REVENUE 884,800 (2,170,700) (71.0) 1,634,736 (685,380) (29.5) (9,323,188) -- (72,977) -- (3,900,215) (94.2) 24,212,595 (15,763,644) (39.4) (5,210,295) (17.7) 7.0 31,567,897 (9,961,639) (24.0) (4,106,768) (11.5) -- 0 (18,727,942) (100.0) (79.2) 34,250,056 (72,977) 239,785 (3,161,628) (93.0) 3,211,212 (2,821,712) (46.8) 0 169,713 6,067,269 $528,482,589 0 (3,278,591) (21,441,199) $37,337,761 (2,215,200) 234,736 211,212 -- 0 (95.1) (645,287) (77.9) % 7.6 % (6,387,731) * $42,462,333 534,775 (37,600) 2,116,662 (709,576) 0 1.6 (51.3) % 145,455,499 (71,554,882) (33.0) % 8.7 % $6,150,458,864 ($751,853,279) (10.9) % (5,071,582) (0.1) 9.7 (60.4) -(12.9) (13,019,159) (8.2) % $7,223,552 0.1 % * Other Adjustments Urban Revenue Sharing Budget Plan Transfers Leaseback Proceeds Sub-Total Other Adjustments TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE (52,387,052) 8,252,731 8,987,236 (18,277,701) 0 (43,399,816) 0 (10,024,970) -- 0 0.0 (576,257,577) 90,780,039 (67.0) 0 0.0 294,475,725 (308,719,295) -(51.2) (2) 0.0 0 0.0 -- 0 -- 735,419,300 735,419,300 -- 30.0 % 0 0.0 % 453,637,448 517,480,044 -- % 0 $42,462,333 9.6 % $6,604,096,312 ($234,373,235) (3.4) % $7,223,550 0.1 % (2) 0.0 (0.0) % $485,082,773 $27,312,791 6.0 % Highway User Revenue Fund $99,106,000 $6,029,000 6.5 % ($4,668,000) (4.5) % $1,091,839,000 ($51,512,000) (4.5) % ($47,726,000) (4.2) % Tobacco Tax (All Funds Total) $29,804,808 $2,083,376 7.5 % $5,675,031 23.5 % $304,038,476 ($40,138,860) (11.7) % $10,173,251 3.5 % Non-General Funds * After accounting for a $10 million technical adjustment in Corporate Income Taxes, the May adjusted growth rate is 5.6%, and the year-to-date decline is (11.0)%. 6 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Economic Indicators NATIONAL “Year-over-year, total nonfarm employment was down by (0.7)%, or (16,600) jobs. This was the slowest rate of decline since February 2008.” Consumer prices, as measured by the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI), decreased by (0.2)% in May, following April’s (0.1)% decline. The drop in consumer prices was primarily due to falling gasoline prices. The core CPI, which excludes food and energy prices, inched up 0.1% in May and is now 1.0% above last year’s level, the lowest rate of core inflation since the mid-1960s. The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) reported that Semiconductor Billings (3-month moving average) in the U.S. reached $3.94 billion in April, a 3.1% improvement from the prior month and a 48.9% increase over April 2009 levels. April experienced the largest amount of semiconductor sales since November 2006. ARIZONA The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s coincident index gauges current economic activity in each state. The index combines 4 indicators: employment, average hours worked in manufacturing, unemployment rate, and inflation-adjusted wages. The state coincident index for Arizona advanced for the fifth consecutive month in May with a month-over-month increase of 0.4%. Under the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank’s rule-of-thumb, 3 consecutive months of increases of the index tend to signal that the economy has turned a corner and is beginning to recover. As seen in the graph, the Arizona coincident index reached a trough in December 2009. See Tracking Arizona’s Recovery, for additional historical information. 220 (July 1992 = 100) The Conference Board’s U.S. Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose by 0.4% in May. The modest increase comes on the heels of an upward revision for April. Most of the small gain was attributable to an increase in money supply and a favorable spread between shortand long-term interest rates. At a reading of 109.9, the index has improved by close to 10% over the last 12 months. Arizona Coincident Economic Activity Index 230 210 200 190 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Employment According to latest release of employment data by Arizona Department of Commerce, the state added 3,400 nonfarm payroll jobs in May. However, absent the additional 9,600 federal workers added to the payrolls in May (most of whom were hired for the 2010 Census), the state would have experienced a net job loss of (6,200). The average job loss for the month of May in the prior 10 years was (100). Six of the 10 industries that comprise private sector employment shed jobs in May, with most of those losses concentrated to professional and business services and the leisure and hospitality industry. Year-over-year, total nonfarm employment was down by (0.7)%, or (16,600) jobs. This was the slowest rate of decline since February 2008. Year-over-year job losses peaked in June 2009 when there were reportedly (217,200), or (8.4)%, fewer people on the payrolls than in the previous year. Since the onset of the recession in December 2007, the state has lost (287,500) jobs, which constitutes a (10.6)% reduction of the workforce. While nonfarm employment has yet to reach its trough (on a year-over-year basis), available data suggests that this will occur within the coming few months. See Tracking Arizona’s Recovery, for additional historical information. The average weekly hours of production workers in manufacturing industries is a leading indicator since “factory hours” tend to lead the business cycle as employers usually adjust work hours before increasing or decreasing the size of their workforce. According to the Arizona Department of Commerce, preliminary data indicates that the average 7 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Economic Indicators “…the number of foreclosure notices - the initial step in the foreclosure process – totaled 6,471, a (8.4)% decrease from the prior month and a (24.9)% decrease from a year ago.” work week in May was 40.3 hours, the best reading since December 2008. This leading indicator has improved in each of the last 3 months and was (as of May) 2.8% above last year’s level, the largest year-over-year increase since January 2007. This improvement suggests that the manufacturing sector is likely to begin adding people to their payrolls in the coming months. The state’s unemployment rate was 9.6% in May, a 0.1% increase over the prior month. This measure has remained essentially unchanged over the last 4 months. The state’s jobless rate has more than doubled since it reached a record-low 3.7% during the second quarter of 2007. The Department of Commerce reported that 27,535 initial claims for unemployment insurance were filed in May. At this level, there were (4,271), or (13.4)%, fewer claims than in the prior month. The reduction in claims was mostly attributable to seasonal factors. To provide some perspective, the prerecession average decline for the month of May was (16.6)%. May marked the seventh consecutive month with a year-over-year decline in claims. Initial jobless claims peaked in April 2009 when more than 41,000 individuals filed for benefits. See Tracking Arizona’s Recovery, for additional historical information. Housing Foreclosure related data continued to improve in May. In Maricopa County, the number of foreclosure notices - the initial step in the foreclosure process – totaled 6,471, a (8.4)% decrease from the prior month and a (24.9)% decrease from a year ago. The number of pending foreclosures decreased (3.9)% from the prior month to 44,997. Pending foreclosures peaked at 51,466 in December 2009. At their current levels, initial foreclosure notices and pending foreclosures are at their lowest levels since July 2008 and May 2009, respectively. See Tracking Arizona’s Recovery, for additional historical information. Statewide, an average of 1,153 single-family residential building permits were issued per month between March and May. At this level, activity is (4.2)% below the previous period but 16.1% above levels a year ago. Over the last year, a total of 14,268 singlefamily permits have been issued. (Continued) State Agency Data Participation in income driven programs declined somewhat over the prior month, but still remains significantly above last year. In June, AHCCCS caseloads equaled 1.36 million members, a 0.2% increase over the prior month. AHCCCS caseloads are currently 8.5% above June 2009 levels. Total enrollment has stayed essentially unchanged since December 2009. The FY 2010 budget funded a projected June caseload growth of 14.4%, for a total of 1,435,445 members. There were 74,187 TANF recipients in the state in April, a monthly caseload decrease of (3.0)%. Year-over-year, the number of TANF recipients has declined by (12.1)%. The FY 2010 budget assumed that the June 2010 TANF caseload would be 84,287. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as Food Stamps, provides assistance to low-income households to purchase food. In April, there were a total 1.02 million food stamp recipients in the state, a decrease of (1.9)% over the prior month. Compared to the same month last year, food stamp participation was up by 29.3%. The number of food stamp recipients began increasing steadily in July 2007, after several years in the 550,000 to 575,000 range. The Department of Correction’s (ADC) inmate population 3-month average count totaled 40,584 inmates between March and May 2010. During this period, population growth averaged 77 inmates per month. Fiscal yearto-date, however, population growth has increased at an average rate of only 18 inmates per month. In counties other than Maricopa County (who funds all of their probation programs), the state and counties share the costs of probation programs. Based on adult and juvenile probation data from February and April, respectively, the non-Maricopa probation caseload was 19,616 individuals – 122 less probationers than the prior month and 614 probationers less than a year ago. In Maricopa County, there were 28,881 probationers during the period, 51 less than the prior month and 808 less than a year ago. 8 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Economic Indicators (Continued) Table 6 ECONOMIC INDICATORS Indicator Arizona - Unemployment Rate - Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims - Unemployment Insurance Claimants - Non-Farm Employment – Total Manufacturing Construction - Average Weekly Hours, Manufacturing - Contracting Tax Receipts (3-month average) - Retail Sales Tax Receipts (3-month average) - Residential Building Permits (3-month moving average) Single-unit Multi-unit - Greater Phoenix Existing Home Sales Single-Family Townhouse/Condominium - Greater Phoenix Median Home Sales Price Single-Family Townhouse/Condominium - Foreclosure Activity, Maricopa County Foreclosure Notices (Notice of Trustee’s Sales Recorded) Pending Foreclosures (Active Notices) S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index (Jan. 2000 = 100) - Months Supply of Housing, (ARMLS) - Phoenix Sky Harbor Air Passengers - Arizona Average Natural Gas Price ($ per thousand cubic feet) - Arizona Consumer Confidence Index (1985 = 100) - Arizona Coincident Index (July 1992 = 100) - Arizona Personal Income - Arizona Population - AHCCCS Recipients - TANF Recipients - SNAP (Food Stamps) Recipients - ADC Inmate Growth (3-month average) - Probation Caseload (Adult/Juvenile) Non-Maricopa Maricopa County United States - Gross Domestic Product (Chained 2005 dollars, SAAR) - Consumer Confidence Index (1985 = 100) - Leading Indicators Index (2004 = 100) - U.S. Semiconductor Billings (3-month moving average) - Consumer Price Index, SA (1982-84 = 100) Time Period Current Value Change From Prior Period Change From Prior Year May May May May May May May Mar-May Mar-May 9.6% 27,535 84,120 2.43 million 147,800 115,000 40.3 $29.1 million $126.6 million 0.1% (13.4)% (3.7)% 0.1% (0.2)% 1.6% 2.5% 7.5% 4.3% 0.4% (21.0)% (20.5)% (0.7)% (3.7)% (12.1)% 2.8% (29.1)% (5.7)% Mar-May Mar-May 1,153 112 (4.2)% 2.1% 16.1% 167.5% May May 9,660 1,510 (5.8)% (9.6)% (3.2)% 39.2% May May $145,000 $103,000 (2.0)% 1.0% 7.4% (10.4)% May May March May April March 6,471 44,997 109.52 6.8 months 3.31 million $7.41 (8.4)% (3.9)% (0.5)% 0.2 months (4.3)% 2.3% (24.9)% 0.5% 2.5% 0.7 months 0.4% (9.5)% 2nd Quarter 2010 May 1st Quarter 2010 July 1, 2009 June April April Mar-May 49.6 200.25 $220.0 billion 6.60 million 1,362,618 74,187 1,022,647 40,584 (1.2)% 0.4% 1.1% N/A 0.2% (3.0)% (1.9)% 77 inmates NA (0.4)% 1.0% 1.5% 8.5% (12.1)% 29.3% 404 inmates Feb/Apr Feb/Apr 19,616 28,881 (122) (51) (614) (808) 1st Quarter 2010 (Second Estimate) May May Feb-Apr May $13.2 trillion 3.0% 2.5% 63.3 109.9 $3.94 billion 217.2 9.7% 0.4% 3.4% (0.2)% 15.5% 9.7% 48.9% 2.0% 9 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 JCCR Meeting At its June 16, 2010 meeting, the Joint Committee on Capital Review considered the following issues: School Facilities Board – Review of $100 Million Lease-Purchase Issuance – The Committee gave a favorable review of the leasepurchase issuance of $100 million in Qualified School Construction Bonds. In addition, the Committee gave a favorable review of 9 new school construction projects, with the provision that the School Facilities Board not release funds for the construction of the Laveen Elementary School District and Liberty Elementary School District projects until the Committee reviews the districts’ enrollment counts in relation to their capacity. enrollment forecasts for these districts, the Committee requested additional student count information once these figures are made available in the fall. Arizona Game and Fish Department – Review of Remaining Ben Avery Shooting Facility Improvements – The Committee favorably reviewed the department’s request to expend $460,700 in remaining funds for the Ben Avery Shooting Facility project. A total of $950,000 was appropriated for this project, of which $489,300 was favorably reviewed by the Committee at its November 2009 meeting. These 2 districts were projected to be over capacity in FY 2012 and FY 2013, respectively. In order to assess the accuracy of the Summary of Recent Agency Reports AHCCCS – Report on Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements Program – Pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2903.03, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) provided its quarterly report on the collection and verification of documentation associated with the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. AHCCCS, in conjunction with the Department of Economic Security (DES), verified the immigration status of 36,284 individuals between October 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009. During this period, AHCCCS and DES did not identify any fraudulent documents using the SAVE program. (Amy Upston) Economic Estimates Commission – Report on the Budget Stabilization Fund – Pursuant to A.R.S. § 35-144F, the Economic Estimates Commission (EEC) is annually required to calculate the amount of monies that may be deposited to or withdrawn from the Budget Stabilization Fund (BSF). The EEC estimate is calculated based on a formula that compares the growth rate of real adjusted Arizona personal income in the most recent calendar year to the average in the last 7 calendar years (hereafter referred to as the “trend” growth rate). The formula recommends a BSF withdrawal whenever the annual adjusted personal income growth rate is both less than the trend growth rate and 2%. According to a EEC report issued May 27, 2010, the calendar year 2009 growth rate was (7.19)% compared to the trend growth rate of 4.68%. Since both requirements for a fund withdrawal were met, the BSF formula recommends that $768.7 million be transferred to the General Fund in FY 2010. This transfer cannot be implemented, however, since the $(2.8) million withdrawal authorized by Laws 2010, 7th Special Session, Chapter 1 brought the BSF balance to $0. (Hans Olofsson) 10 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 May Spending reflects a rollover of the monthly payment, as was done in May of 2009. Year to date University spending is $785.2 million, or $(46.8) million below FY 2009. FY 2010 Spending May 2010 spending of $257.1 million was $4.2 million higher than May 2009. For the year-todate, spending of $7.7 billion is ($1.2) billion below 2009 (See Table 7). • The Arizona Department of Education (ADE) has spent $3.2 billion year-to-date in 2010, or $(487.0) million less than 2009. In May, ADE spending was $(65.6) million lower than the prior year. May expenditures were lower than the prior year due to ADE using $49.0 million in Fiscal Stabilization Fund monies to offset the General Fund Basic State Aid payment to charter schools. Additionally, ADE did not make $20 million in payments to school districts because it had exhausted its FY 2010 General Fund appropriation. • Spending in AHCCCS and DHS is a combined ($16.3) million less in May than in 2009. This is generally consistent with the FY 2010 budget assumption that caseload growth in Medicaid spending in those agencies would be offset by varying degrees by enhanced federal match from the federal stimulus legislation. • University spending was $2.1 million in May. The low expenditure amount • SFB spending is $99.7 million greater in May than in 2009. This is due to the repayment of a temporary General Fund loan being accounted for as negative spending in May of 2009. Table 7 General Fund Spending ($ in Millions) May 10 Agency AHCCCS Corrections Economic Security Education Health Services Public Safety School Facilities Board Universities Other Total $114.2 59.4 17.4 21.9 8.5 1.7 0.1 2.1 31.8 $257.1 Change from May 09 $(28.8) (13.2) 14.9 (65.6) (3.1) (0.2) 99.7 2.8 (2.3) $ 4.2 Year to Date YTD Change from FY 09 $1,190.4 779.6 527.5 3,170.1 477.1 40.4 104.7 785.2 601.2 $7,676.2 $(233.5) (40.9) (192.6) (486.6) (89.7) (13.5) 16.5 (46.8) (111.2) $(1,198.3) 11 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Table 8 Agency Department of Administration Office of Administrative Hearings Department of Agriculture AHCCCS Arizona Commission on the Arts Arizona Exposition and State Fair Board Attorney General AZ Capital Post Conviction Public Defender State Board of Charter Schools State Bd. of Chiropractic Exam. Department of Commerce Community Colleges Corporation Commission Department of Corrections AZ Criminal Justice Commission AZ State Board of Cosmetology AZ St. Schools for the Deaf & Blind Dept. of Economic Security Department of Education DEMA Dept. of Environmental Quality DEQ-WQARF Office of Equal Opportunity State Board of Equalization Board of Executive Clemency Dept. of Financial Institutions Department of Fire, Life, Bldg Safety State Board of Funeral Directors Arizona Geological Survey Government Information Tech. Governor Gov. - OSPB Department of Health Services Arizona Historical Society Prescott Historical Society of AZ Independent Redistricting Comm. AZ Commission of Indian Affairs Department of Insurance Judiciary Supreme Court Superior Court Court of Appeals Dept. of Juvenile Corrections State Land Department Law Enforcement Merit System General Fund Spending ($ in Thousands) Change from May 10 May 09 1,573.8 1,909.3 62.4 3.8 442.5 (87.2) 114,243.2 (28,764.2) 26.8 (54.4) - Year-to-Date 17,846.9 877.3 7,776.9 1,190,480.7 820.9 400.0 797.4 28.3 (273.4) (10.9) 16,316.6 606.8 42.8 753.2 37.3 59,541.6 2,023.3 17,405.3 21,883.7 513.6 328.9 10.4 22.3 35.8 138.3 116.5 33.3 25.0 416.1 112.8 8,547.0 159.0 35.7 2.7 310.7 8.9 543.4 95.9 (13,218.7) 726.3 14,861.3 (65,594.9) (546.9) (408.4) (18.2) 3.2 (24.6) (21.1) (67.8) (83.0) (16.9) (27.8) (40.9) (3,072.9) 22.6 7.7 (7.5) 2.7 92.3 642.1 148.0 3,221.4 132,426.3 522.7 779,662.6 (4.6) 252.0 20,208.9 527,486.2 3,170,102.0 8,755.5 5,069.6 7,000.0 180.6 603.9 833.7 2,780.7 2,024.2 100.0 699.3 413.6 6,464.5 1,797.5 477,098.1 3,679.4 610.5 26.1 83.0 5,233.0 1,199.2 10,279.6 926.8 3,337.4 (1,563.6) 3.6 177.6 (1,128.1) (64.9) (956.7) (2,198.7) (1.9) 15,798.0 84,338.9 12,956.7 58,110.5 10,162.1 70.9 YTD Change from FY ‘09 (6,004.6) (176.8) (1,778.3) (233,518.8) (594.3) 400.0 (2,813.8) (92.3) (139.1) 148.0 (23,038.3) (3,309.5) (3,479.9) (40,852.1) (1,190.2) 252.0 (1,832.7) (192,550.6) (486,589.0) (1,764.1) (440.3) (6,000.0) (23.8) 32.7 (138.0) (339.2) (775.4) 100.0 (138.5) (968.1) 400.3 (134.7) (89,720.4) (197.6) (17.0) (201.1) (108.8) (917.9) 1,363.4 (3,938.1) 340.7 (7,854.1) (5,084.8) (0.7) 12 JLBC – MONTHLY FISCAL HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2010 Agency Legislature Auditor General House of Representatives Joint Legislative Budget Comm. Legislative Council AZ Library and Archives Senate Dpt. of Liquor Licenses Board of Medical Student Loans Mine Inspector Dpt. of Mines & Mineral Resources Nav. Streams & Adjudication State Board of Nursing OSHA Arizona State Parks Board Personnel Board Comm. for Postsecondary Ed. State Board of Psychologist Exam. Department of Public Safety Arizona Department of Racing Radiation Regulatory Agency Arizona Rangers Pension Real Estate Department Department of Revenue School Facilities Board Secretary of State Tax Appeals Board Office of Tourism Department of Transportation State Treasurer Universities Board of Regents Arizona State University Northern Arizona University University of Arizona Department of Veteran Services AZ State Veterinary Medical Examining Board Department of Water Resources Dept. of Weights & Measures Other Grand Total May 10 Change from May 09 Year-to-Date YTD Change from FY ‘09 1,145.6 809.6 135.3 273.4 396.6 594.7 (45.5) 154.2 6.8 (1,900.0) 86.7 1,737.6 163.7 66.8 1.2 141.3 2,113.9 70.5 601.7 15.8 153.4 48.5 (107.4) (15.0) (36.4) 119.6 (43.6) (182.9) (139.3) 71.1 (11.9) (1.0) (342.3) (17.8) (17.1) (211.7) 110.8 70.3 (13.4) (1,267.4) 99,671.3 406.3 (1.7) 4.1 (7.9) 13,616.4 11,314.6 2,082.3 4,534.1 5,850.4 8,025.5 747.7 801.9 1,022.6 785.1 118.8 14.4 20,214.2 3,417.8 300.0 40,438.2 4,668.9 1,356.2 12.8 2,828.1 32,513.2 104,701.2 6,580.7 236.6 200.0 52.8 2,390.3 (2,042.2) (409.6) (171.2) (7,474.5) (340.6) (63.1) (2,857.8) (199.1) (368.9) (103.4) (144.9) (95.4) 14.4 (3,122.4) (305.9) (679.7) 300.0 (13,518.2) 2,546.5 (245.2) 0.3 (609.9) (28,450.9) 16,455.8 475.0 (9.5) (112.2) (5.2) 21.2 321.3 491.7 1,327.8 1,090.2 - 993.7 491.7 1,327.8 622.0 - 20,413.6 345,234.6 117,372.9 302,161.2 8,789.2 250.0 1,959.1 (23,293.1) (6,616.8) (18,873.4) 2,048.9 250.0 780.4 68.3 2,071.1 257,062.3 (709.7) (12.8) 2,013.9 4,241.3 14,799.8 1,113.7 22,526.3 7,676,170.1 5,138.1 (175.6) (3,535.6) (1,198,300.8)