Managing Efficiencies to Maximize Arizona’s Resources arizona power authority 48th annual report 2006 “Common sense is not so common.” – Voltaire TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR 2 REPORT OF THE COMMISSION 4 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 5 HISTORICAL ENERGY SALES 5 OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT 6 SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY AND ENERGY SALES 7 MANAGEMENT’s DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 17 REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 18 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 22 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Commission Staff John I. Hudson Joseph W. Mulholland Chairman Executive Director Dalton H. Cole Michael A. Gazda Vice-Chairman Deputy Director Michael C. Francis Delbert R. Lewis Richard S. Walden Arizona Power Authority Rita K. Gallant Executive Secretary 1810 W. Adams Street • Phoenix, AZ 85007-2697 (602) 542-4263 • FAX (602) 253-7970 December 1, 2006 The Honorable Janet A. Napolitano Governor of Arizona State Capitol Ninth Floor, West Wing Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Governor: On behalf of the Arizona Power Authority’s Commissioners and staff, I submit the 48th Annual Report. This report details the Authority’s operation and financial activities for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, and features the Authority’s efforts in administering Arizona’s hydroelectric power entitlement generated at the Hoover Dam and Power Plant located on the Colorado River. As you are aware, the Colorado River system is experiencing a severe drought cycle of seven years, one of the most severe in recorded history. This has adversely impacted the entire river system, including Lake Mead and other reservoirs. As a result of the lowered levels of water impounded in Lake Mead, the amount of hydroelectric generation available to Arizona has been reduced by 13 percent from Arizona’s contractual entitlement of 377 megawatts. The storage in Lake Mead is at approximately fifty-four percent (54%) of its cabability. Nevertheless, the State’s water and power entitlements, although at reduced levels of electric generation, are still available for the State’s use. The Authority continues its aggressive and active involvelment in the federal and state efforts to mitigate the drought impacts. The Authority is also continuing to investigate opportunities for development of various renewable, electric power generating resources to assist our customers with greater diversity of electric power generation and reduce their dependancy on fossil-fuel energy resources. These resources, if developed, would supplement the hydro resource and provide clean energy for Arizona. Sincerely, John I. Hudson, LT GENERAL, USMC (Ret.) Chairman 1 REPORT OF THE COMMISSION Effective management has always been a key to fulfilling the Arizona Power Authority’s mandate to provide the citizens of Arizona with low cost power. Now more than ever the efficient administration of Arizona’s federal hydroelectric power entitlement from Hoover Dam and Power Plant is essential. This includes monthly oversight and the application of comprehensive cost containment measures as well as exploring innovative approaches for delivering low-priced electric power for Arizona. In this way, the Authority remains focused on maximizing existing resources, as well as examining opportunities for leveraging new energy sources. John I. Hudson, LT GENERAL, USMC (Ret.) Chairman First appointed to the Arizona Power Authority Commission in March 2000, John I. Hudson was elected Chairman in January 2006 with his current term expiring in 2012. A retired Lieutenant General in the U.S. Marine Corps where he served for 37 years, John Hudson is a member of the Board of Directors of the Yuma Regional Medical Center. In addition, he is a member and past chairman of the Greater Yuma Port Authority Board of Directors, a founding Director of the Foothills Bank of Yuma, a member of the Foothills Rotary Club of Yuma and past president of Yuma’s 78-CRIME Board of Directors. Dalton H. Cole Vice-Chairman Appointed to the Commission in January 2002 for a term to run until 2008, Dalton Cole was elected to be the Vice-Chairman in January 2006. A retired businessman and farmer, a past member of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District Board, Mr. Cole co-founded and chaired the HoHoKam Irrigation District. For 18 years, he also served on the board of Electrical District No. 2 in Pinal County and is a past chairman. In addition, Mr. Cole is a past chairman of the State Board of Directors for Community Colleges. He has served on the Ground Water Management Committee for Pinal County, as well as advisory committees to the Arizona Legislature regarding water and power issues. 2 Michael C. Francis Starting his tenure on the Commission in 1999, Mr. Francis was selected Chairman in April 2003 and re-elected to this position in 2005. His current term expires in January 2008. In addition to his invaluable work on the Commission, Mr. Francis is a partner in Santa Lucia Farms, producer of over 3.7 million garden rose bushes annually. Mr. Francis also owns and operates Francis Insurance Agency, which insures Arizona and California farmers. Mr. Francis is a Board of Directors member of M&I Bank, Arizona Region. He is also a member of the American Rose Society. Delbert R. Lewis First appointed to the Arizona Power Commission in April 2003, Delbert Lewis has been reappointed for a six-year term ending in January 2010. As one of the founders of KTVK Channel 3 and the CEO of MAC America Communications, Inc., Mr. Lewis’ past and present civic affiliations include the Arizona Broadcasters Association, Metropolitan Phoenix Broadcasters, Phoenix Chamber of Commerce, Samaritan Health Services, Greater Phoenix Leadership, the National Conference, Maricopa County Sports Authority and Orpheum Theatre Foundation. Now farming 4,000 acres of farmland near Florence, Arizona. Mr. Lewis and his wife, Sharon, have been nationally recognized for their financial support and commitment to education and community service. Richard S. Walden Appointed to the Commission in 1984 and re-appointed through his present term expiring in 2010, Mr. Walden is the President and CEO of Farmers Investment Company, a family-owned, pecan growing and processing company headquartered in Sahuarita, Arizona. Mr. Walden is a member of the Board of the International Tree Nut Council and in that capacity serves as the chairman of the Committee for Nutrition and Education associated with the Nutrition and Education Foundation. Mr. Walden is also a former member of the Advisory Council on Small Business and Agriculture for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and a member of the Board of the National Pecan Shellers Association. 3 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE ENERGY TO EXCEL Energy is in the news and will no doubt remain there for the foreseeable future. Fluctuations in the availability and cost of energy directly influence Arizona’s economy. So efficiency is at a premium as never before. At the Arizona Power Authority, this means maximizing resources and preparing now to meet the needs of the future. Without a doubt, the Authority’s most vital resource is its people. Recent years have seen considerable staff turnover, ushering in a younger, more energetic team who are truly qualified and motivated to excel. We’re particularly pleased to welcome our new Deputy Director, Mike Gazda, previously with the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, who arrives with a great deal of experience and knowledge in power generation and transmission planning and operations. As a team, we take great pride in understanding the challenges at hand and developing innovative approaches for meeting them. Professionalism is high and the commitment to serve our customers is taken personally. As a result, we have become a more able and responsive organization. This year, the Arizona State Legislature extended the Authority’s operating mandate through July 1, 2016. During the review process, the Legislature expressed strong interest in the Authority’s performance, reflecting the heightened awareness regarding energy resources. In doing so, the Legislature acknowledged a more dynamic role for the Authority to play in the energy welfare of the state. To mitigate these conditions and their impact on generation capacity, modifications are being implemented at Hoover’s power plant. Improved turbines and associated equipment generate greater power per unit, thereby helping to offset the power lost from lower water levels. In addition, superior water flow systems have been implemented, to reduce friction and help maintain generation capacity. In addition, the Authority is exploring the possibility of reducing transmission costs through a purchase in capacity from the Western Transmission System, which Western could use to reduce its debt service. The saving incurred would be passed on directly to our customers. The Authority is also exploring ways of integrating renewable energy resources, such as solar and wind, to complement Hoover power and ensure reliability. Security remains a high Hoover Dam requires New methodologies are on a continuous basis, potential threats. priority as well. As a national icon, comprehensive safety measures. being developed and implemented in order to remain ahead of any While the challenges are significant, the Authority has never been better positioned to meet them. As we address immediate needs of our customers, we continue to look forward as well, in order to ensure efficiency and stability for the long term. In keeping with this mission, the Authority is actively responding to on-going drought conditions throughout the Colorado River system. Lake Mead, which provides the water for generation at the Hoover Power Plant, is currently at 54% of its capacity. Water levels are at 1125 feet above sea level, whereas the 30-year average is about 1200 feet. “Experience is one thing you can’t get for nothing.” – Oscar Wilde 4 HOOVER ENERGY SALES SUPPLEMENTAL ENERGY SALES GWh 1400 HISTORICAL ENERGY SALES 1300 1200 The following graph illustrates the Authority’s 1100 historical energy sales (GWh) since 1998 for 1000 power obtained from the Hoover Power Plant and 900 for supplemental sales. Supplemental power is 800 obtained by the Authority for sale to customers 700 on an “as requested” basis. This energy augments 600 the customers’ allocation from the Authority. 500 400 300 200 100 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FISCAL YEAR 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 HOOVER ENERGY 1,389 1,318 1,205 1,103 1,098 899 753 681 653 SUPPLEMENTAL ENERGY TOTAL ENERGY 3 2 4 0 0 0 23 38 6 1,392 1,320 1,209 1,103 1,098 899 776 719 659 OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS The Colorado River System experienced a “wet year” primarily in the lower basin through heavy rainfall in the mountains surrounding the various tributaries that drain into Lake Mead and other smaller reservoirs. As a result, deliveries to the International Boundary with Mexico were satisfied through these inflows, which allowed the entire 8.23 million acre feet of releases from the upper basin to be stored in Lake Mead, increasing its storage slightly. For water year 2007, the Secretary of the Interior has indicated that there may be some “partial domestic surpluses” available, which would provide more water to the Hoover generators and an increase in energy generation for the fifteen Hoover customers, including the Arizona Power Authority. During the 2006-2007 Winter overhaul period, two additional unit overhauls and two unit modifications are planned for a total of four units with improved capacities. These improvements will potentially add another thirty-three megawatts to the total Hoover capacity at lake levels below 1,145 feet, as well as substantial reductions in water leakage. Since Lake Mead levels historically are below 1,145 feet about 90% of the time, these improvements will benefit customers for many years to come. ENVIRONMENT The voluntary Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program is nearing the completion of its second year of the 50-year program. Many of the administrative procedural processes are completed and the focus is now centered on actual implementation of the program’s objectives. Although below normal inflow to the Colorado River Basin system continued through 2006, improvements to the efficiencies of the Hoover generators have been accelerated to mitigate the loss of capacity and total energy produced. In the last two years, two of the Hoover generating units have been overhauled with new, stainless-steel wicket gates resulting in about fourteen MW of increased capacity at the lower water levels, plus a substantial reduction of bypass water leakage. “It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.” – Henry David Thoreau 5 SALE OF HYDRO POWER CUSTOMERS Aguila Irrigation District Average Billing Demand (kW) Energy Delivered (kWh) Sales ($) Mills Per kWh Prior Year Adj. ($) (4,013) 4,964 9,128,000 $ 242,489 26.57 497 2,215,000 $ 49,846 22.50 (1,147) 2,352 6,778,000 $ 158,642 23.41 (2,394) 127,515 120,428,000 $ 4,817,867 40.01 (107,266) 734 3,263,000 $ 65,164 19.97 (841) 5,081 13,616,000 $ 232,559 17.08 (956) Electrical District No. 2, Pinal 15,348 52,205,000 $ 1,178,980 22.58 (18,380) Electrical District No. 3, Pinal 12,546 58,458,000 $ 1,553,205 26.57 (19,378) Electrical District No. 4, Pinal 15,348 61,228,000 $ 1,202,709 19.64 (22,521) Electrical District No. 5, Pinal 11,655 43,836,000 $ 861,511 19.65 (16,114) 276 3,277,000 $ 59,616 18.19 (1,437) 6,320 17,607,000 $ 351,830 19.98 (4,889) Avra Valley Irrigation & Drainage District Buckeye Water Conseration District Central Arizona Water Conservation District Chandler Heights Citrus Irrigation District Cortaro-Marana Irrigation District Electrical District No. 5, Maricopa Electrical District No. 6, Pinal Electrical District No. 7, Maricopa 8,285 16,521,000 $ 391,543 23.70 (4,620) Electrical District No. 8, Maricopa 19,096 44,029,000 $ 1,114,549 25.31 (18,518) Harquahala Valley Power District 1,964 7,481,000 $ 169,124 22.61 (3,350) Maricopa County Municipal Water District No. 1 6,976 21,547,000 $ 488,666 22.68 (5,230) McMullen Valley Water Conserv. & Drainage Dist. 26.13 (6,184) (3,076) 7,173 13,187,000 $ 344,520 Ocotillo Water Conservation District 1,886 11,892,000 $ 224,253 18.86 Queen Creek Irrigation District 1,397 1,843,000 $ 37,272 20.22 Roosevelt Irrigation District 2,541 12,620,000 $ 258,554 20.49 $ Roosevelt Water Conservation District Salt River Project San Tan Irrigation District Silverbell Irrigation & Drainage District (3,906) 98,414 20.30 (225) $ 2,250,600 22.21 (48,251) 1,699,000 $ 19.30 5,334 4,847,000 30,609 101,351,000 410 32,786 560 4,336,000 $ 78,956 18.21 (1,534) Tonopah Irrigation District 1,223 3,767,000 $ 88,059 23.38 (1,495) Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation & Drainage District 2,296 7,610,000 $ 163,679 21.51 (1,157) 821 848,000 $ 18,473 21.78 1,641 3,470,000 $ 86,815 25.02 (310) (214) City of Page City of Safford Town of Thatcher Town of Wickenburg TOTAL HYDRO POWER SALES 828 1,855,000 $ 45,836 24.71 1,807 1,816,000 $ 50,848 28.00 297,483 652,758,000 $ 16,717,365 $22.69 $ (297,406) PRIOR YEAR (OY-05) CUSTOMER $ (302,754) REFUND ACCRUAL CURRENT FISCAL YEAR CUSTOMER $(1,201,939) REFUND ACCRUAL TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL POWER SALES $ 5,950,918 OTHER ELECTRIC SERVICES INCOME* $ 5,462,409 TOTAL POWER INCOME $ 26,328,596 * Includes Administrative fees, facilities charges, late charges, and Scheduling Entity revenue. 6 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AUTHORITY HIGHLIGHTS The following is a discussion and analysis of the Arizona Power Authority’s (“Authority”) financial performance for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. This discussion is designed to: (a) assist the reader in focusing on significant financial issues, (b) provide an overview of the Authority’s financial activity, and (c) identify changes in the Authority’s financial position. Scheduling Entity Agreement The Authority and Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District were parties to a Scheduling Entity Agreement which expired on September 30, 2004, and provided for Salt River Project (“SRP”) to pay the Authority $8.4 million each year in return for allowing SRP to be the Scheduling Entity of the Hoover generation in Arizona. The new Agreement became effective as of October 1, 2004, provides for SRP to pay the Authority $5.4 million each year, and expires on September 30, 2011. The effect of this agreement is that the energy banking program with SRP has been increased, to the advantage of our customers. However, because payment from SRP has been reduced by $3.0 million each year, the rates for Hoover power increased accordingly. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) focuses on the 2006 and 2005 fiscal year’s activities, resulting changes and known facts, and should be read in conjunction with the Authority’s annual report for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. This MD&A is an introduction to the basic financial statements of the Authority, which are comprised of two components. (1) Fund Financial Statements (2) Notes to the Financial Statements Transmission Agreement The Fund Financial Statements begin on page 18 and provide detailed information about the individual funds. A fund is a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts that the Authority uses to keep track of specific sources of revenues and disbursements for specific purposes. The Authority’s funds are treated as proprietary and are independent of each other. Most of the Authority’s financial dealings are with contracts outside of state government. A separate fund is not maintained for government activities. The Authority does not act as a fiduciary. On January 24, 2003, the Authority and the Western Area Power Administration (“Western”) entered into an agreement for the Advancement of Funds for Transmission Services. The Authority had an existing agreement with Western that provided for the delivery of power and energy. The agreement provides for the Authority to advance funds to Western on a monthly basis to fund operations, maintenance and replacement costs associated with Western’s transmission services. For the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority advanced a net prepaid deposit of $182,360, which is included in the Statements of Net Assets. This new contract gives Western greater flexibility and allows them to work more effectively with the Authority and other customers. USING THIS ANNUAL REPORT This annual report consists of a series of financial statements. The Statements of Net Assets, the Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets and the Statements of Cash Flows (on pages 18-21, respectively) provide information about the activities of the Authority as a whole and present a longer-term view of the Authority’s finances. The Authority is a body, corporate and politic, of the State of Arizona and is a special-purpose government entity engaged only in business-type activities. Accordingly, the financial statements presented in this Annual Report are the required basic financial statements in accordance with the provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements – and Management’s Discussion and Analysis – for State and Local Governments. Contributions During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, the Authority contributed $60,000 via the Arizona Power Authority Scholarship Program. The following schools each received $20,000: Arizona State University, The University of Arizona, and Northern Arizona University. Funds On January 1, 1971, new Hoover contracts between the Authority and its customers went into effect. At that time, previously earned funds from “steam sales” and other sales were placed into a fund identified as the APA Fund. Simultaneously, the Arizona Power Authority Commission established the Hoover Energy Fund to account for revenues and expenditures applicable to the sale and transmission of power and energy received by the Authority under its Hoover Energy Contract. 7 Effects of Drought on Hoover Energy Economic Drought Condition The Colorado River Basin has been experiencing severe drought conditions for the past seven years. Although the drought conditions have mitigated in recent years, there has been a reduction in Lake Mead’s storage and the power production at Hoover Dam. In response to customer requests, the Authority continues to purchase supplemental power to offset the reduced energy production at Hoover. The supplemental power costs are significantly higher than Hoover rates, and are passed directly to the requesting customers. These supplemental revenues and costs are reflected on the Authority’s books, resulting in higher revenue and purchased power costs. Although the drought condition in the Colorado River Basin continues, improvements at Hoover Dam have resulted in increased efficiency and increased capacity from the generators. EXPENSES Introduction of New Programs There were no changes during this fiscal year; however, individual programs may be added or deleted to meet changing Authority needs. Increase/Decrease in Authorized Personnel Changes in the Authority’s services may result in increasing/ decreasing authorized staffing. Fiscal year 2006 staffing costs (salary and related benefits) represent 2.62% of the Authority’s operating costs. For fiscal year 2005, staffing costs represent 2.60% of the Authority’s operating costs. Arizona State Treasurer-Held Investment Write-off The Authority is statutorily required to invest funds through the Arizona State Treasurer (“Treasurer”), who has sole investment decision-making authority. In November 2002, the Authority was advised that one of the Treasurer’s chosen investments managed by National Century Financial Enterprises was under investigation for fraud. In December 2002, the Authority was informed that the Treasurer was vitiating the investment in question, thereby reducing the value to zero. Since that time, litigation was initiated and continues. There is no guarantee that the litigation will result in the recovery of the Authority’s funds, which total $227,224. Therefore, the Authority wrote off the lost investment amount as of June 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2006, a total of $88,785 has been recovered. In fiscal year 2006, $62,702 was received and is presented as Other Income. Salary Structure (cost of living, merit and market adjustment) The ability to attract and retain competent personnel requires the Authority to provide a competitive salary structure, which is reviewed annually, pursuant to State guidelines. During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, changes in staffing resulted in a net reduction in salaries. REVENUES Increase/Decrease in Commission-Approved Power Rates State statute requires the rates be set at levels to recover the cost of supplying service. In addition, contracts between the Authority and its customers provide specific details regarding rate determination. The Arizona Power Authority Commission is solely responsible for periodically adjusting rates, as appropriate. In response to the reduced power production from Hoover, and bond rating analysis, the Commission raised rates by 15% in February 2006. Market Impacts on Investment Income Favorable market conditions during fiscal year 2006 resulted in an increase in interest rates, yielding greater investment income for the year. 8 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS • The Authority’s 2006 net assets increased by $561,639, or 20.4%, due mainly to increased rates. • The Authority’s 2005 net assets decreased by $773,807, or 21.9%, primarily due to the timing in prepaid purchased power usage. • The Authority’s 2006 operating revenues decreased by $143,839, or 0.5%, due to accrual of fiscal year 2006 customer refunds. • The Authority’s 2005 operating revenues increased by $1,026,668, or 4.0%, primarily due to increased supplemental power sales volume. STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS There are six normal transactions that will affect the comparability of the Statements of Net Assets summary presentation: Net Results of Activities which will impact (increase/decrease) current assets and undesignated net assets. Borrowing for Capital which will increase assets and long-term debt. Spending Borrowed Proceeds on New Capital which will reduce current assets and increase capital assets. There is a second impact, an increase in invested capital assets and an increase in related net debt, which will not change the investment in capital assets, net of debt. Spending of Non-borrowed Current Assets on New Capital which will (a) reduce current assets and increase capital assets, and (b) will reduce undesignated net assets and increase investment in capital assets, net of debt. Principal Payment on Debt which will reduce current assets and reduce long-term debt. Reduction of Capital Assets through Depreciation which will reduce capital assets and investment in capital assets, net of debt. 9 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS BUSINESS TYPE ACTIVITIES June 30, Current assets 2006 2005 $ 1 3,774,025 $ 1 1,558,522 49,307,084 52,113,652 235,769 211,786 63,316,878 63,883,960 7,077,825 5,261,291 1,816,534 34.5% Long-term assets Capital assets, net Total assets Current liabilities Diff $ $ 2 ,215,503 (2,806,568) Diff % 19.2% (5.4%) 23,983 11.3% (567,082) (0.9%) Long-term (bonds payable, net) 52,921,922 55,867,177 (2,945,255) (5.3%) Total liabilities 59,999,747 61,128,468 (1,128,721) (1.8%) 235,769 211,786 23,983 11.3% 3,081,362 2,543,706 537,656 21.1% 3,317,131 2,755,492 561,639 20.4% $ 63,316,878 $ 63,883,960 $ (567,082) (0.9%) Net assets Invested in capital assets Unrestricted Total net assets Total liabilities and net assets Fiscal Year 2006 Condensed Statements of Net Assets Discussion Long-Term Liabilities Decreased due to a pay down of the bond principal. See further explanation on page 12. Current Assets Increased due to an increase in prepaid purchased power, increased accounts receivable, and an increase in the Debt Service cash account. Net Assets Are explained on page 13 and 14. Long-Term Assets Decreased because of a payment of principal for the current year Uprating Program. Capital Assets, Net Increased due to the investment in the new parking lot for the office building. Current Liabilities Increased due to an increase in amounts owed pursuant to power contracts at June 30, 2006 and an accrual for fiscal year 2006 customer refunds. 10 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS BUSINESS TYPE ACTIVITIES June 30, Current assets 2005 2004 Diff $ Diff % $ 11,558,522 $ 13,045,876 $ (1,487,354) (11.4%) 52,113,652 54,296,784 (2,183,132) 211,786 159,403 63,883,960 67,502,063 (3,618,103) (5.4%) 5,261,291 5,421,283 (159,992) (3.0%) Long-term assets Capital assets, net Total assets Current liabilities 52,383 (4.0%) 32.9% Long-term (bonds payable, net) 55,867,177 58,551,481 (2,684,304) (4.6%) Total liabilities 61,128,468 63,972,764 (2,844,296) (4.4%) 211,786 159,403 2,543,706 2,755,492 $ 63,883,960 Net assets Invested in capital assets Unrestricted Total net assets 52,383 32.9% 3,369,896 (826,190) (24.5%) 3,529,299 (773,807) (21.9%) $ 67,502,063 $ (3,618,103) (5.4%) Total liabilities and net assets Fiscal Year 2005 Condensed Statements of Net Assets Discussion Long-Term Liabilities Decreased due to a pay down of the bond principal. See further explanation on page 12. Current Assets Decreased due to a reduction in prepaid purchased power and an increase in customer refunds, which resulted in a reduction in cash. Net Assets Are explained on pages 13 and 14. Long-Term Assets Decreased because of a payment of principal for the current year Uprating Program. Capital Assets Net increased due to additions of new air conditioning units for the office building, a new circuit breaker and a right-of-way easement for the E.D. #5 substation. See further explanation on page 12. Current Liabilities Decreased due to a reduction in amounts owed pursuant to power contracts at June 30, 2005. 11 CAPITAL ASSETS LIQUIDITY As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority had $235,769 and $211,786, respectively, invested in a variety of capital assets, as reflected in the following schedule, which represents a net increase (additions less retirements and depreciation) of $23,983, or 11.3% during fiscal year 2006 and a net increase of $52,383 or 32.9% during fiscal year 2005. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Section 30-124, the Commission of the Authority shall establish electric rates to include such price components as are necessary to maintain the Authority, to provide and maintain reasonable working capital and depreciation and other necessary and proper reserves. Components that are necessary to maintain the Authority include employee payroll, occupancy costs, cost of purchases or construction of generation and transmission services, and any cost factors chargeable to the cost of providing service as the Commission deems necessary or advisable to establish and maintain the financial integrity of the Authority. Contracts for sale of electric power to the Authority’s customers include rates which may be modified upon 24-hour notice when such action is necessary in the sole judgment of the Commission in order to achieve the purposes of A.R.S. Section 30-124. The Commission, on a monthly basis, reviews the financial status of the Authority, including expenses and revenues and the adequacy of the rates to maintain the Authority’s financial integrity. Transmission plant Distribution plant General plant - office Invested in capital assets, end of year June 30, 2006 June 30, 2005 $ 27,464 $ 30,516 31,757 40,482 176,548 140,788 $ 235,769 $ 211,786 The following reconciliation summarizes the change in Capital Assets for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, which is presented in detail on page 25 of the Notes to the Financial Statements: Beginning balance June 30, 2006 June 30, 2005 $ 211,786 $ 159,403 Additions 64,248 98,420 Disposals - (5,013) (40,265) (41,024) $ 235,769 $ 211,786 Depreciation Ending balance DEBT OUTSTANDING As of June 30, 2006, the Authority had $54,960,000 in debt outstanding, compared to $57,520,000 in the prior year, as a result of the payment of a principal payment of $2,560,000, which was paid on October 1, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, the Authority had $57,520,000 in debt outstanding, compared to $60,065,000 in the prior year, as a result of the payment of a principal payment of $2,545,000, which was paid on October 1, 2004. Also see page 26 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for a detailed summary of debt activity during the year. 12 STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS There are normal transactions that will affect the comparability of the Statements of Changes in the Net Assets summary presentation: Operating Expenses Which increase/decrease as a result of purchased power costs, transmission costs, and operating costs. Operating Revenues Which increase/decrease as a result of economic conditions and power usage. Other Income (Deductions) Which increase/decrease as a result of investment market conditions. STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS BUSINESS TYPE ACTIVITIES June 30, 2006 Operating revenues Diff $ Diff % $ 26,328,596 $ 26,472,435 2005 $ (143,839) (0.5%) 19,404,200 20,805,429 (1,401,229) (6.7%) Operating expenses Purchased power Western credits (5,167,368) (5,119,484) (47,884) 0.9% Amortization of Hoover Uprating 5,167,368 5,119,484 47,884 0.9% Transmission and distribution Program costs 5,258,886 5,256,841 2,045 0.0% Administrative and general 1,405,247 1,348,146 57,101 40,265 41,024 Depreciation Other Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) (759) 109,518 70,837 38,681 26,218,116 27,522,277 (1,304,161) (1,049,842) 1,160,322 110,480 4.2% (1.9%) 54.6% ( 4.7%) 110.5% Other (deductions) income Interest expense Deferred interest expense (2,862,363) (2,990,812) 128,449 (4.3%) 2,347,319 2,520,052 (172,733) (6.9%) Amortization 120,255 124,304 Interest income 750,465 596,597 153,868 25.8% 95,483 25,894 69,589 268.7% Other, net (4,049) (3.3%) Total other (deductions) income 451,159 276,035 Change in net assets 561,639 (773,807) Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year $ 2,755,492 3,529,299 3 ,317,131 $ 2 ,755,492 13 175,124 63.4% 1,335,446 172.6% (773,807) $ 5 61,639 (21.9%) 20.4% Fiscal Year 2006 Changes in Net Assets Discussion Net Assets increased overall because of the following: • Operating Revenues decreased due to the accrual of fiscal year 2006 customer refunds. 2006 REVENUES • Total Operating Expenses decreased due to a decrease in purchased power. Hoover Power Sales $20,315,268 74.43% • Western Credits increased because of changes in debt payments and associated costs related to the Uprating Program. • Amortization of the Uprating Program increased because of the increase in the amortization of long-term bond costs. • Administrative and General expenses increased due to Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) expenses. • Depreciation decreased due to the normal attrition of capital assets. Other Income $215,738 0.79% • Other expenses increased due to the initiation of special expenses, such as the Colorado River Legal Defense Fund and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Supplemental Power Sales/Admin Charges $6,013,328 22.03% Interest Income $750,465 2.75% 2006 EXPENSES Supplemental Power Purchased $5,950,918 22.26% Depreciation $40,265 0.15% Hoover Power Purchased $13,453,282 50.32% Other Costs $109,518 0.41% Administrative & General $1,405,247 5.26% 14 Transmission & Distribution $5,258,886 19.67% Net Interest Expense $515,044 1.93% STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS There are basic or normal transactions that will affect the comparability of the Statements of Changes in the Net Assets summary presentation: Operating Expenses Which increase/decrease as a result of purchased power rates, transmission costs, and operating costs. Operating Revenues Which increase/decrease as a result of economic conditions and power usage. Other Income (Deductions) Which increase/decrease as a result of investment market conditions. STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS BUSINESS TYPE ACTIVITIES June 30, 2005 Operating revenues Diff $ Diff % $ 26,472,435 $ 25,445,767 2004 $ 1,026,668 4.0% 20,805,429 18,014,692 2,790,737 Operating expenses Purchased power Western credits 15.5% (5,119,484) (5,224,715) 105,231 (2.0%) (105,231) (2.0%) Amortization of Hoover Uprating Program costs 5,119,484 5,224,715 Transmission and distribution 5,256,841 5,247,155 9,686 Administrative and general 1,348,146 1,564,083 (215,937) 41,024 35,870 5,154 14.4% (31,485) (30.8%) Depreciation Other 0.2% (13.8%) 70,837 102,322 Total operating expenses 27,522,277 24,964,122 2,558,155 10.2% Operating income (loss) (1,049,842) 481,645 (1,531,487) (318.0%) Other (deductions) income Interest expense (2,990,812) (3,209,937) 219,125 (6.8%) Deferred interest expense 2,520,052 2,735,366 (215,314) (7.9%) Amortization 124,304 47,177 77,127 163.5% Interest income 596,597 541,265 55,332 10.2% 25,894 2,882 23,012 798.5% Other Total other (deductions) income Change in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year 276,035 116,753 (773,807) 598,398 159,282 (1,372,205) 3,529,299 2,930,901 598,398 $ 2 ,755,492 $ 3 ,529,299 $ ( 773,807) 15 136.4% (229.3%) 20.4% (21.9%) Fiscal Year 2005 Changes in Net Assets Discussion Net Assets decreased overall because of the following: • Operating Revenues increased as a result of increased supplemental power sales. 2005 REVENUES • Total Operating Expenses increased due to an increase in purchased power costs. Hoover Power Sales $19,995,362 73.46% • Western credits decreased because of changes in debt payments and associated costs related to the Uprating Program. • Amortization of the Uprating Program increased because of the increase in the amortization of long-term bond costs. • Administrative and general expenses decreased due to a reduction in annual report expenses, reduction in Commission and staff travel, payroll costs, and a reduction of legal expenses. • Depreciation increased because additional capital assets were acquired (such as new air conditioning units for the office building, a new circuit breaker and a right-of-way easement for the ED #5 substation). Other Income & Amortization $150,198 0.55% • Other operating expenses decreased due to reduced costs in connection with utility organizations, such as WestConnect, which is an independent system operator-type organization that has suspended further development. Supplemental Power Sales/Admin Charges $6,477,073 23.80% Interest Income $596,597 2.19% 2005 EXPENSES Supplemental Power Purchased $6,451,476 23.05% Depreciation $41,024 0.15% Hoover Power Purchased $14,353,953 51.28% Other Costs $70,837 0.25% Administrative & General $1,348,146 4.81% 16 Transmission & Distribution $5,256,841 18.78% Net Interest Expense $470,760 1.68% REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Arizona Power Authority Commission In our opinion, the accompanying statements of net assets and the related statements of revenues, expenses, and changes in net assets, and statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Arizona Power Authority (the “Authority”) (A Body, Corporate and Politic, of the State of Arizona) at June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Authority’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. The accompanying management’s discussion and analysis is not a required part of the financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. November 21, 2006 17 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 APA General Fund 2006 Hoover Uprating Fund 2005 2006 Total 2005 2006 2005 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ Investments held by Trustee 3,517,969 $ 3,619,626 $ 2,457,591 1,973,165 $ 5,975,560 - - 2,818,376 $ 2,426,277 2,818,376 $ 2,426,277 5,592,791 598,577 464,188 2,349,602 2,181,432 2,948,179 2,645,620 20,331 15,477 128,733 122,963 149,064 138,440 170,063 50,702 - - 170,063 50,702 Accounts receivable, customer power purchases Interest receivable Other assets Prepaid purchased power Total current assets Capital assets, net Investments held by Trustee - - 1,712,783 704,692 1,712,783 704,692 4,306,940 4,149,993 9,467,085 7,408,529 13,774,025 11,558,522 235,769 211,786 - - 235,769 211,786 - - 6,546,569 6,766,682 6,546,569 6,766,682 - - 42,578,155 45,164,610 42,578,155 45,164,610 Advances for Hoover Uprating Program, net Prepaid transmission Total assets 182,360 182,360 - - 182,360 182,360 $ 4,725,069 $ 4,544,139 $ 58,591,809 $ 59,339,821 $ 63,316,878 $ 63,883,960 $ 15,440 $ $ $ $ Liabilities Current liabilities Accounts payable and other Customer refunds $ 33,640 96,239 112,920 111,679 146,560 - - 1,504,693 - 1,504,693 - Power contracts payable 593,456 461,973 1,335,405 1,353,166 1,928,861 1,815,139 Accrued interest payable - - 707,592 739,592 707,592 739,592 Bonds payable - - 2,825,000 2,560,000 2,825,000 2,560,000 608,896 495,613 6,468,929 4,765,678 7,077,825 5,261,291 Bonds payable - - 52,135,000 54,960,000 52,135,000 54,960,000 Premium (discounts) on - - 2,474,561 2,852,699 2,474,561 2,852,699 - - (1,687,639) (1,945,522) (1,687,639) (1,945,522) Total current liabilities bonds payable Deferred amounts, net Bonds payable, net Total liabilities - 52,921,922 55,867,177 52,921,922 $ 608,896 $ 495,613 $ 59,390,851 $ 60,632,855 $ 59,999,747 $ 235,769 $ 211,786 $ $ $ 55,867,177 $ 61,128,468 Net Assets Invested in capital assets Unrestricted Total net assets - - 235,769 $ 211,786 3,880,404 3,836,740 (799,042) (1,293,034) 3,081,362 2,543,706 4,116,173 4,048,526 (799,042) (1,293,034) 3,317,131 2,755,492 4,725,069 $ 4,544,139 $ 59,339,821 $ 63,316,878 $ 63,883,960 Total liabilities and net assets $ $ 58,591,809 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 18 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 APA General Fund 2006 Operating revenues Hoover Uprating Fund 2005 2006 Total 2005 2006 2005 $ 6,013,328 $ 6,477,073 $ 20,315,268 $ 19,995,362 $ 26,328,596 $ 26,472,435 5,950,918 6,451,476 13,453,282 14,353,953 19,404,200 20,805,429 - - Operating expenses Purchased power Western credits (5,167,368) (5,119,484) (5,167,368) (5,119,484) Amortization of Hoover Uprating Program costs Transmission and distribution - - 5,167,368 5,119,484 5,167,368 5,119,484 324 18,946 5,258,562 5,237,895 5,258,886 5,256,841 Administrative and general 70,558 67,666 1,334,689 1,280,480 1,405,247 1,348,146 Depreciation 40,265 41,024 - - 40,265 41,024 Other Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) 82,899 40,110 26,619 30,727 109,518 70,837 6,144,964 6,619,222 20,073,152 20,903,055 26,218,116 27,522,277 (131,636) (142,149) 242,116 (907,693) 110,480 (1,049,842) Other (deductions) income Interest expense Deferred interest expense Amortization Interest income Other - - (2,862,363) (2,990,812) (2,862,363) (2,990,812) - - 2,347,319 2,520,052 2,347,319 2,520,052 - - 120,255 124,304 120,255 124,304 131,356 69,361 619,109 527,236 750,465 596,597 67,927 15,777 27,556 10,117 95,483 25,894 199,283 85,138 251,876 190,897 451,159 276,035 (57,011) 493,992 (716,796) 561,639 (773,807) Total other (deductions) income Changes in net assets 67,647 Net assets, beginning of year 4,048,526 4,105,537 (1,293,034) (576,238) Net assets, end of year $ 4,116,173 $ 4,048,526 $ ( 799,042) $ ( 1,293,034) $ 2,755,492 3,529,299 3,317,131 $ 2 ,755,492 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 19 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 APA General Fund 2006 Hoover Uprating Fund 2005 2006 Total 2005 2006 2005 Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers $ 5,759,578 $ 6,666,029 $ 21,651,791 $ 19,950,426 $ 27,411,369 $ 26,616,455 Cash payments to suppliers for goods or services (5,991,416) (6,783,401) (20,512,553) (19,407,140) (26,503,969) (26,190,541) - (603,132) (612,545) (603,132) (612,545) (117,372) 536,106 (69,259) 304,268 (186,631) - (2,894,363) (3,023,260) (2,894,363) (3,023,260) - (2,560,000) (2,545,000) (2,560,000) (2,545,000) (64,248) (98,420) Cash payments to employees for services - Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (231,838) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Interest payments on bonds payable Payments on bonds payable Acquisition of capital assets (64,248) (98,420) - - 4,933,774 4,923,316 4,933,774 Advances for Hoover Uprating Program - - 4,923,316 Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related financing activities (64,248) (98,420) (520,589) (644,944) (584,837) (743,364) 194,429 77,479 640,895 531,952 835,324 609,431 - - (7,467,429) (10,429,978) (7,467,429) (10,429,978) - - 7,295,443 10,437,032 7,295,443 10,437,032 194,429 77,479 468,909 539,006 663,338 616,485 (138,313) 484,426 (175,197) 382,769 (313,510) 3,619,626 3,757,939 1,973,165 $ 3,517,969 $ 3,619,626 Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments Purchase of investments Proceeds from sale and maturities of investments Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Net change in cash and cash equivalents (101,657) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 2,148,362 5,592,791 5,906,301 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,457,591 $ 1,973,165 $ 5,975,560 $ 5,592,791 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (CONTINUED) JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 APA General Fund 2006 Hoover Uprating Fund 2005 2006 Total 2005 2006 2005 Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Operating income (loss) $ (131,636) $ (142,149) $ 242,116 $ (907,693) $ 110,480 $ (1,049,842) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Depreciation Loss on disposal of capital asset 40,265 41,024 - - 40,265 41,024 - 5,013 - - - 5,013 Changes in assets and liabilities (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (134,389) 231,770 (119,361) (42,814) (168,170) (44,936) (302,559) 186,834 (Increase) decrease in other assets - - (119,361) (42,814) - (1,008,091) 815,698 (1,008,091) 815,698 21,033 (16,681) 13,238 (34,881) 34,271 (Increase) decrease in prepaid purchased power - Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other (18,200) Increase (decrease) in customer refunds - - 1,504,693 - 1,504,693 - Increase (decrease) in power contracts payable 131,483 Total adjustments (231,249) (100,202) (17,761) 24,777 293,990 54,434 113,722 (176,815) 838,434 193,788 863,211 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (231,838) $ (117,372) $ 536,106 $ (69,259) $ 304,268 $ (186,631) $ - $ - $ 2,347,319 $ 2,520,052 $ 2,347,319 $ 2,520,052 $ - $ - $ 2,894,363 $ 3,023,260 $ 2,894,363 $ 3,023,260 Supplemental schedule of noncash capital and related financing activities Deferred interest expense Supplemental schedule of cash paid for interest The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net assets. The Authority’s reported total net assets are segregated into invested in capital assets and unrestricted components. Description of Business The Arizona Power Authority (the “Authority”) is a body, corporate and politic, without taxing power, established by the Arizona Legislature on May 27, 1944 by the Power Authority Act. Under the Power Authority Act, the Authority is directed to obtain electric power developed from the mainstream of the Colorado River and sell such power to certain qualified purchasers. The Power Authority Act provides that the Authority must be a self-supporting agency and prohibits the Authority from incurring any obligation, which would be binding upon the State of Arizona. Basis of Accounting Basis of Accounting refers to the time at which revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The accrual basis of accounting is used by the Authority whereby revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they are earned and become measurable, and expenses are recognized when incurred. The Authority supplies capacity and energy on a wholesale basis to certain power purchasers in the State of Arizona. The Authority’s primary source of power and energy is the Hoover Power Plant at Hoover Dam, located approximately 25 miles from Las Vegas, Nevada. Hoover power is produced by the Boulder Canyon Project hydropower plant owned by the Bureau of Reclamation. Hoover Dam is the highest and third largest concrete dam in the United States of America. Hoover Dam was dedicated in 1935 and the first generator of the Hoover Power Plant was in full operation in October 1936 and has been in continuous operation since. Power and energy from the Hoover Power Plant is transmitted to load centers in Arizona, California and Nevada. The Authority first contracted for Arizona’s share of Hoover power in 1952 and has continuously provided power and energy to its customers since that time. The accompanying financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the reporting model defined by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management’s Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments, as amended by GASB Statement No. 37, Basic Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments: Omnibus - an Amendment of GASB Statements No. 21 and No. 34, and GASB Statement No. 38, Certain Financial Statement Note Disclosures. Accounting Standards The Authority is governed by a commission of five members appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate (the “Commission”). The term of office for each member is six years and the members select a chairman and vice-chairman from among its membership for two-year terms. GASB No. 20, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Proprietary Funds and Other Governmental Entities That Use Proprietary Fund Accounting, requires that governments’ proprietary activities apply all GASB pronouncements as well as pronouncements issued on or before November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statements and Interpretations, Accounting Principles Board Opinions and Accounting Research Bulletins. Governments are given the option whether or not to apply all FASB Statements and Interpretations issued after November 30, 1989, except for those that conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements. The Authority has elected not to implement FASB Statements and Interpretations issued after November 30, 1989. Pursuant to Arizona law, the Commission serves as the Authority’s regulatory body with the exclusive authority to establish electric prices. The Authority is required to follow certain procedures, pertaining to public notice requirements and public meetings, before implementing changes in electric price schedules. Measurement Focus The Authority’s funds are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus. All assets and liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activity are included in the Statements of Net Assets. The Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets 22 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS New Accounting Pronouncements Capital Assets and Depreciation In July 2004, the GASB published Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This Statement establishes standards for the measurement, recognition, and display of OPEB expense/expenditures and related liabilities (assets), note disclosures, and, if applicable, required supplementary information (RSI) in the financial reports of state and local governmental employers. GASB Statement No. 45 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007. The Authority believes the implementation of GASB Statement No. 45 will not have an impact on the financial statements. Capital assets are stated at original cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the property items, which range from 3 to 20 years. The costs of additions and replacements are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Retirements, sales and disposals are recorded by removing the cost and accumulated depreciation from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts with any resulting gain or loss reflected in Other within the Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets. Assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the fair value is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference. In September 2006, the GASB published Statement No. 48, Sales and Pledges of Receivables and Future Revenues and Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets and Future Revenues. This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for transactions in which a government receives, or is entitled to, resources in exchange for future cash flows generated by collecting specific receivables or specific future revenues. It also contains provisions that apply to certain situations in which a government does not receive resources but, nevertheless, pledges or commits future cash flows generated by collecting specific future revenues. This Statement is effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2006. GASB No. 48 is currently being evaluated by the Authority. Advances for Hoover Uprating Program Proceeds from bonds payable were advanced by the Authority for uprating the Hoover Power Plant and are recorded as advances. Such advances, including debt issue costs, plus net interest expense incurred by the Authority are reimbursed in the form of credits on the monthly power bills rendered by the Western Area Power Administration of the Department of Energy (“Western”). These credits are issued over the 30-year life of the bonds. Substantially all advances, net interest expense and other related costs on the bonds are charged to the Uprating Program as amounts to be recovered from future credits. Revenue Recognition Schedule C Energy The Authority recognizes revenue when power is delivered to the customers. Under its Electric Service Contract with Western, the Authority has preferential rights to excess energy (“Schedule C energy”) generated at the Hoover Power Plant. The Authority buys Schedule C energy when available from Western during an operating year (October 1 to September 30). The Authority’s financial statements are prepared on a fiscal year (July 1 to June 30) basis. When excess energy is available, the Authority bills its customers as Schedule C energy is delivered and receives payment during a given operating year, but Western does not bill for the cost of such Schedule C energy until the following operating year. An estimate of such amounts is accrued at the end of the fiscal year. The Statements of Net Assets as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 has a $0 accrual for Schedule C energy, as no Schedule C energy was available during the operating years. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Authority treats short-term temporary cash investments with original maturities, when purchased, of three months or less as cash equivalents. All cash and cash equivalent balances are maintained by the State of Arizona Treasurer within the Local Government Investment Pool (“LGIP”). The LGIP is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and investments are not subject to custodial credit risk. The State Board of Investment conducts monthly reviews of investment activity and performance. LGIP amounts are carried at fair value. Participant shares are purchased and sold based on the Net Asset Value (“NAV”) of the shares. The NAV is determined by dividing the fair value of the portfolio by the total shares outstanding. Operating Revenues Operating revenues are derived from the sale of power to customers or from other contractual agreements. Operating revenues include $5,400,000 and $6,150,000 received 23 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS from Salt River Project for scheduling entity services during the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The revenues are the result of an agreement between the Authority and the Salt River Project which will yield $5,400,000 annual revenues to the Authority thereby reducing the overall revenue requirements to be paid by the Authority’s customers through power rates. The agreement will expire on September 30, 2011. districts, and cities, which represent contracted customers in the state of Arizona. The Hoover Uprating Fund is used to purchase electric power solely from Western. The Authority’s APA General Fund is used to purchase electric power from various providers. 2. Fund Accounting Hoover Uprating Fund The Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984 (“Hoover Act”) authorized the U.S. government to increase the capacity of existing generating equipment at the Hoover Dam Power Plant (“Uprating Program”). Instead of appropriating further federal funds for the Uprating Program, Congress implemented an advancement of funds procedure whereby prospective nonfederal purchasers of the uprated Hoover capacity and associated energy contribute to the financing of the Uprating Program. The Uprating Program was determined to be complete in September 1995. The Authority financed a portion of the total Uprating Program by issuing bonds. Application of Net Assets to Expenses Incurred The Authority applies unrestricted, undesignated net assets to expenses incurred. To the extent undesignated net assets are unavailable, unrestricted, designated net assets will be applied to expenses incurred. Customer Credits The Authority operates on a nonprofit basis and reduces charges to its customers through credits on power bills or checks to customers, for any revenues in excess of expenses after the close of the operating year. Likewise, the Authority bills its customers for any deficit in revenues versus expenses incurred during the operating year. The Hoover Uprating Fund accounts for advances by the Authority in connection with the Uprating Program. Effective June 1, 1987, the Authority executed new power contracts with Western and its customers which expire in 2017. The revenues and expenditures applicable to the sale and transmission of power and energy received by the Authority from Western under these contracts are accounted for in the Hoover Uprating Fund. Refunds of $297,405 and $1,024,562 were paid to the customers during the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2006, the accrued amount to be refunded to the customers was $1,504,693. APA General Fund Income Taxes The Authority’s operations other than those applicable to the Hoover Uprating Fund are accounted for in the APA General Fund. The purchase of supplemental power and the sale and transmission of such power to the Authority’s customers comprise the majority of this fund’s activity. The Authority is exempt from federal and Arizona state income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded for the Authority in the accompanying financial statements. Use of Estimates 3. Capital Assets, net The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Capital assets, net, of the APA General Fund at June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows: Transmission plant Current liabilities include customer refunds of $1,504,693 for fiscal year 2006. 2006 $ 319,565 2005 $ 319,565 Distribution plant 227,518 227,518 General plant 777,076 726,808 1,324,159 1,273,891 (1,088,390) (1,062,105) Less: Accumulated Geographic and Product Concentration depreciation The Authority’s revenues are derived from the sale of electrical power and services to water districts, electrical and irrigation Capital assets, net 24 $ 235,769 $ 211,786 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2005 Additions Disposals June 30, 2006 Capital assets Transmission plant $ Distribution plant General plant - office Total capital assets 319,565 $ - $ - $ 319,565 227,518 - - 227,518 726,808 64,248 (13,980) 777,076 1,273,891 64,248 (13,980) 1,324,159 (289,049) (3,052) - (292,101) (187,036) (8,725) - (195,761) (586,020) (28,488) 13,980 (600,528) (1,062,105) (40,265) 13,980 (1,088,390) 211,786 $ 23,983 Accumulated depreciation Transmission plant Distribution plant General plant - office Total accumulated depreciation Capital assets, net $ $ - $ 235,769 The transmission and distribution plant is comprised of a substation and related equipment. Purchased power is delivered over transmission facilities owned by Western. 4. Advances for Hoover Uprating Program Advances for the Hoover Uprating Program were reimbursed by Western through credits on the Authority’s power bills in the amount of $5,167,368 and $5,119,484 for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Credits were received for the upraters’ portion of principal and interest expense on the bonds and other costs associated with the Hoover Uprating Program. 5. Bonds Payable Bonds payable consists of the following: June 30, 2005 Increases Reductions Transfers Bond payable current Bond payable long-term Total bonds payable June 30, 2006 $ 2,560,000 $- $ (2,560,000) $ 2,825,000 $ 2,825,000 54,960,000 - - (2,825,000) 52,135,000 $ 57,520,000 $- $ (2,560,000) - $ 54,960,000 25 $ NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In prior years, the Authority defeased various issues of bonds by purchasing U.S. government securities which were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for future debt service until the call dates. As a result, those bonds are considered to be defeased and the corresponding liability has been removed from the Hoover Uprating Fund. Accordingly, the trust account assets and related liabilities are not included in the Authority’s financial statements. called portion of the 1993 Series Bonds are no longer outstanding and cease to be entitled to any lien on the revenues pledged to payment of those bonds. Instead, the revenue stream originally pledged to secure the called portion of the 1993 Series Bonds “crossed over” to pay debt service on the 2001 Series Bonds on October 1, 2003. The 2001 Series Bonds bear interest at a rate of 5.00% and 5.25% payable on April 1 and October 1, respectively, of each year, commencing April 1, 2004 and maturing in 2017. In addition, the Authority recognized an economic gain (difference between the present value of the old and new debt service payments) of $2,095,648. The crossover refunding also resulted in the recognition of a deferred amount of $2,411,956 that has been reflected as a decrease in bonds payable and which will be amortized using the effective interest method as a component of interest expense over the life of the refunded bonds. The Authority amortized $257,883 and $266,532 for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, resulting in a net deferred amount of $1,687,639 and $1,945,522 in the Statement of Net Assets, respectively. The Authority also recognized a premium of $3,536,652 on the crossover refunding which has been reflected as an increase in bonds payable and which will be amortized using the effective interest method. The Authority amortized $378,138 and $390,836 for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, resulting in a net premium of bonds payable of $2,474,561 and $2,852,699 in the Statement of Net Assets, respectively. The Authority’s outstanding bonds, totaling $54,960,000, bear interest ranging from 5.00% to 5.25%, are due from fiscal year 2006 through 2018, and are secured by the pledged property, as defined by the Resolution, which includes the proceeds from the sale of the bonds, rights and interest in various contracts and revenues. The Authority amortizes the bond premium (discount) using the effective interest method. Principal amounts due over the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows: $2,825,000 in 2007, $3,120,000 in 2008, $3,450,000 in 2009, $3,815,000 in 2010, $4,220,000 in 2011 and $37,530,000 in 2012 through 2018. Interest amounts due over the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows: $2,759,738 in 2007, $2,611,113 in 2008, $2,446,863 in 2009, $2,265,238 in 2010, $2,064,363 in 2011 and $7,291,771 in 2012 through 2018. Crossover Refunding On September 12, 2001, the Authority issued $57,520,000 of Special Obligation Crossover Refunding Bonds. Proceeds from the sale of the bonds along with a fund contribution by the Authority were held in an escrow trust account invested in government securities until October 1, 2003 (the “Crossover Date”) when a crossover refunding took place. The crossover refunding resulted in $57,520,000 of Special Obligation Crossover Refunding Bonds being exchanged for 2001 Series Power Resource Revenue Refunding Bonds of the same principal amount, maturity date and interest rates as the crossover bonds. The Authority called the $62,630,000 of the 1993 Series Power Resource Revenue Refunding Bonds maturing on and after October 1, 2005. 6. Commitments and Contingencies The Lower Colorado Multi-Species Conservation Program (“MSCP”) is a cooperative effort between Federal and nonfederal entities that will create more than 8,100 acres of riparian, marsh and backwater habitat for 31 species of fish, birds, mammals and plants. The program became effective on April 4, 2005 and expires April 30, 2055. As a party to this Agreement, the Arizona Power Authority’s financial obligation is approximately $119,000 per year (in 2003 dollars, adjusted annually for inflation). For the year ended June 30, 2006, the Authority paid $128,877. The proceeds in the government securities escrow trust account, together with the income realized from investment of trust assets, served as collateral for the Special Obligation Crossover Bonds and paid the debt service on those bonds until the Crossover Date. The Special Obligation Crossover Bonds were payable solely from the amounts in the escrow trust account and were not payable from any other source. The Authority is involved in various claims arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, if determined adversely against the Authority, will have a material adverse effect on the business financial condition or results of operations of the Authority. As a result of the crossover refunding transaction on October 1, 2003, the 2001 Series Bonds are reflected as obligations of the Authority at June 30, 2006 and the 26 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 7. Investments Held by Trustee immediately. Total contributions to the Plan for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 by the Authority’s covered employees were $45,864 and $35,527, respectively. As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, investments are collateralized with securities held by the Authority’s trustee. The fair value of the investment securities at June 30 is as follows: 2006 Repurchase agreement U.S. government securities Matching employer member contributions were actuarially determined and fixed at the same rate as employee member contributions for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. In the event the Plan’s actuary determines that additional contributions are needed in order to amortize an unfunded accrued liability, every employer member will be required to contribute the revised contribution percentage which is established by the Arizona State Legislature. 2005 $ 6,546,569 $ 6,766,682 2,818,376 2,426,277 $ 9,364,945 $ 9,192,959 Total investments held by Trustee All full-time employees of the Authority are required to become members of the Plan. The Authority’s total payroll for employees covered by this Plan for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $603,132 and $612,545, respectively. Contributions to the Plan by the Authority for its covered employees vest over five years. All required employer contributions are made to the Plan by the end of each month. On September 19, 1996, the Authority entered into a repurchase and custody agreement with MBIA Investment Management Corporation (“IMC”) wherein the Authority agreed to effect a series of repurchase transactions with IMC, in investments allowable under the bond resolution agreements and state law, with a fixed earnings rate of 6.95%. The securities are held in trust by JP Morgan Institutional Trust Services. If at any time the aggregate market value of all purchased securities is less than the amount required under the repurchase and custody agreement (calculated using a percentage of 104%), the Authority may require IMC to transfer additional securities so the aggregate market value of all securities will equal or exceed such requirement. At June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of all purchased securities exceeded the amount required under the repurchase and custody agreement. 9. Additional Benefits In addition to the pension benefits described above, ASRS offers health care benefits to retired and disabled members who are no longer eligible for health care benefits through their former member employer’s group health plan. Retired is defined as actively receiving an annuity benefit and disabled is defined as receiving a long-term disability (“LTD”) benefit through the LTD program administered by ASRS. A premium benefit is applied to the member’s health insurance cost. The following chart illustrates the maximum amount of the monthly available benefit supplement for eligible members and their dependents: 8. Retirement Plan The Authority contributes to the retirement plan described below. Benefits are established by state statute and generally provide retirement, death, long-term disability, survivor, and health insurance premium benefits. Member Member and Dependent(s) Years of % of Not Not Credited Premium Medicare Medicare Medicare Medicare Service Benefit Eligible Eligible Eligible Eligible The Arizona State Retirement System (the “Plan” or “ASRS”) administers a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan that covers permanent, full-time employees of the Authority. The ASRS is governed by the Arizona State Retirement System Board according to the provisions of ARS Title 38, Chapter 5, Article 2. The ASRS issues a publicly available financial report that includes its financial statements and required supplementary information. By actuarial computation, employee member and Authority contributions to the Plan were fixed at 8.25% (7.75% retirement and 0.50% long-term disability) and 5.70% (5.20% retirement and 0.50% long-term disability) of their compensation for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with the contributions made through payroll deductions. Employee contributions vest 27 5.0 - 5.9 50% $ 75.00 $ 50.00 $ 130.00 $ 85.00 6.0 - 6.9 60% 90.00 60.00 156.00 102.00 7.0 - 7.9 70% 105.00 70.00 182.00 119.00 8.0 - 8.9 80% 120.00 80.00 208.00 136.00 9.0 - 9.9 90% 135.00 90.00 234.00 153.00 10.0+ 100% 150.00 100.00 260.00 170.00 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 10. Purchased Power, Sales and Transmission Commitments The Authority is party to Firm Electric Service and Transmission Service Contracts with terms expiring September 30, 2017. This requires the Authority to pay approximately nineteen percent of Western’s revenue requirements each operating year until the contract expires. During the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority paid $13,453,282 and $14,353,953, respectively, for purchased power under this contract. The Authority is obligated to pay these costs under the contract even in the unlikely event that no power is supplied. The Authority has sales contracts with all customers. Under these contracts, customers are obligated to pay for their percentage allocation if any Hoover power is delivered or made available for delivery. These sales contracts expire September 30, 2017, but some can be terminated by the Authority on June 1, 2007 or thereafter. The Authority also has contracts with Salt River Project for the purchase and transmission of power to the Authority’s customers. Under the transmission contract, the Authority must pay an annual transmission fee of $63,898 until September 30, 2017. The Authority has a power contract with SRP in which supplemental power purchases can be made by the Authority on behalf of its customers. There are no minimum quantities that the Authority is required to purchase. This agreement is applicable when supplemental power is necessary, during such times of low production of Hoover energy, and during summer months when customers require higher levels of energy. During the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority paid $5,950,918 and $6,451,476, respectively, for purchased power under this contract for its customers. The Authority also has a contract with Western for transmission services. During the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority paid $5,258,562 and $5,237,895, respectively, for transmission costs to Western. On January 24, 2003, the Authority entered into the Advancement of Funds for Transmission Services contract with Western. The contract provides for the Authority to advance funds to Western on a monthly basis to fund operations, maintenance and replacement costs associated with Western’s transmission services. The advanced funds are then applied to the subsequent month’s transmission invoice. As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Authority recognized a prepaid deposit of $182,360 that is refundable upon termination of the contract. 28 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO For Year Ended June 30, 2006 NET INCOME $493,992 Add: Interest Expense $2,862,363 Amortization $257,883 Depreciation $26,619 Western Credits $5,167,368 Credits to Customers $1,802,098 for Prior Years Total Additions $10,610,323 Deduct: Deferred Interest Expenses (2,347,319) Premium Amortization Total Deductions $(378,138) $(2,725,457) Income available for debt service $7,884,866 Debt Service $5,621,113 Debt service Coverage ratio 1.40 ARIZONA POWER AUTHORITY 1810 WEST ADAMS STREET PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 (602) 542-4263 FAX (602) 253-7970 PHOTOS COURTESY OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION