January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona’s Economy Economic and business research center Tales of Two Cities: Arizona’s Largest Metropolitan Areas Diverge By George W. Hammond, Ph.D., EBR Director and Research Professor December 1, 2015 has been above the national average since mid-2011. From the third quarter of 2014 to the same quarter of this year, the Phoenix MSA added 48,800 jobs. That translated into a growth rate of 2.7%, which was well above the national rate of 2.0%. It also accounted for 88.1% of net job growth statewide. Keep in mind that the employment data seen here is based on EBRC’s benchmark of the raw BLS data. T he Arizona economy is expanding at a solid, but unspectacular, pace. However, those gains are very unevenly distributed across the state. The Phoenix metro area (MSA), composed of Maricopa and Pinal counties, accounted for most of the state’s job growth during the past year. In contrast, the Tucson MSA (Pima County) generated no net job gains. The rest of the state posted slow job growth. Overall, Arizona remains stuck in low gear, in large part because fiscal drag and low U.S. residential mobility continue to hinder key sectors. The forecast calls for growth to accelerate as these factors gradually loosen their grip. Through September 2015, housing permit activity in the Phoenix MSA has increased strongly, with permits up 17.8% compared to the same period last year. Most of that strength was concentrated in single family permits, which were up 38.9% over 2014. Multifamily permits were running 8.8% below In this issue The outlook for the Phoenix MSA is summarized in Exhibit 2. The forecast calls for economic growth to strengthen during the next three years, with job growth reaching 2.9% by 2017. Stronger job gains translate into faster growth in personal income and retail sales. Keep in mind that the strong growth in retail sales in 2015 is likely related to a change in tax law that is reallocated sales from contracting to the retail category. Exhibit 1: Phoenix MSA Job Growth Outpaces the Nation Over-the-Year Job Growth Rates Percent percent Phoenix MSA and the U.S. 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 -2.5 Phoenix MSA Outlook: Sustained Rapid Growth The Phoenix metro economy is expanding at a faster rate than the nation. As Exhibit 1 shows, job growth in the MSA their 2014 rate. Overall, housing permits are showing signs of strength so far this year, which suggests stronger gains in construction employment in 2016, assuming that builders can overcome a tight construction labor market. U.S.U.S. Phoenix Phoenix MSA MSA -5.0 -7.5 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 -10.0 Photos of Tucson and Phoenix State Capitols, Shutterstock.com Tales of Two Cities: Arizona’s Largest Metropolitan Areas Diverge Fourth Quarter 2015 Forecast Update. . . . . . 1 Forecast Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Arizona Economic Indicators: State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Arizona Economic Indicators: Metro Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Arizona Economic Indicators: Counties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Arizona’s Economy From the third Exhibit 2: Phoenix MSA Outlook Summary Actual* quarter of 2014 to the same quarter of this Forecast 2014 2015 2016 2017 Growth Rate year, the Phoenix MSA Nonfarm Jobs 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.9 added 48,800 jobs. That Personal Income 5.0 5.5 5.5 6.1 Retail Sales Less Food 3.8 9.9 5.5 5.9 Population 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 20,341 23,316 25,979 33,266 translated into a growth rate of 2.7%... Level Housing Permits * Personal income is forecast. Tucson MSA Outlook: Growing, but Still Slow Professional and business services; leisure and hospitality; education and health care; financial activities; and information all added jobs. However, those gains were roughly offset by losses in natural resources and mining; other services; manufacturing; construction; trade, transportation, and utilities; and government. The Tucson MSA (Pima County) has been losing steam during the past three years, with gradually decelerating job gains (Exhibit 3). As the graph suggests, monthly data for Tucson tends to be volatile, so it is wise to focus on more on quarterly/annual data. In the third quarter of 2015, Tucson’s employment was virtually unchanged from a year ago. That’s a big contrast with the nation, state, and Phoenix MSA, each of which added jobs at a rate of 2.0% or greater. Again, keep in mind that the employment data seen here is based on EBRC’s benchmark of the raw BLS data. The government sector generated the largest job losses over the year, with the big decline coming in state and local government. These losses reflect employment reductions at the University of Arizona, as well quirks in the counting of teachers returning to work. Overall, Tucson’s slow growth since 2012 has reflected the impact of fiscal drag. During 2013-2014, this was primarily driven by federal fiscal drag, with the imposition Performance has been quite different across industries during the past four quarters. Exhibit 3: Tucson MSA Job Growth Loses Steam Over-the-Year Job Growth Rates percent Percent Tucson MSA and the U.S. 8 6 4 2 0 -2 U.S. U.S. Tucson Tucson MSAMSA 96 2 98 00 -4 -6 02 04 06 08 10 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona 12 14 -8 January, 2016 Winter Issue Exhibit 4: Tucson MSA Outlook Summary In the third quarter Actual* Forecast 2014 2015 2016 2017 Nonfarm Jobs 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.6 Personal Income 3.6 3.6 3.9 4.7 Retail Sales Less Food 2.4 10.8 3.7 3.5 Population 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 3,250 3,901 4,039 4,502 Growth Rate Level Housing Permits of 2015, Tucson’s employment was virtually unchanged from a year ago. That’s a big contrast with the nation, state, and * Personal income is forecast. of the sequester and other federal budget cuts. Lately, state and local fiscal drag has become more of an issue, with state budget cuts affecting the local economy. Fiscal drag tends to impact Tucson more than Phoenix or the state as a whole. This happens simply because federal and state/ local activity is a larger share of the local economy. Government (federal civilian and military, as well as state and local) accounted for 21.9% of Tucson’s GDP in 2014, compared to 12.4% for the U.S., 13.8% for the state, and 10.1% for Phoenix. The forecast calls for Tucson to grow during the next three years, but at a modest pace (Exhibit 4). Job growth accelerates from 0.3% in 2015 to 1.6% by 2017. The acceleration reflects less federal (and state and local) fiscal drag, as well as increased U.S. residential mobility which boosts population gains. sector would not recover to the degree expected in the baseline forecast. In addition, a continued appreciation in the value of the U.S. dollar carries risks for the state. Exports, particularly to Mexico, have been a bright spot for the state economy during the past year. A much stronger dollar would weigh on exports during the next couple of years, adversely affecting both merchandise exports and international tourist expenditures. Phoenix MSA, each of which added jobs at a rate of 2.0% or greater. Need to know more? Contact EBRC Director George Hammond, Ph.D., about the benefits of becoming a Forecasting Project sponsor! Risks to the Forecast One major risk to the baseline forecasts for Phoenix and Tucson is the possibility of a downturn in the U.S. economy. A U.S. recession would take the wind out of Arizona’s sails, and push growth down or even generate a recession for Phoenix and Tucson. In addition, there are state-specific risks to the outlook, particularly the risk that U.S. residential mobility never increases substantially above current levels. This would generate much slower-than-expected state population gains and the housing ebr.eller.arizona.edu 3 Arizona’s Economy Tucson Teacher Wages: Location, Location, Location by Maile L. Nadelhoffer, Senior Research Economist ...after adjustment (for cost of living), Tucson and Phoenix come in last for median teacher pay among Western metros. The median wage for secondary school teachers in Tucson was $38,240 in 2014, substantially lower than their peers in Phoenix and $18,070 less than for secondary school teachers in the U.S. overall. This means that Tucson teachers earned only 68 percent of what their colleagues earned nationally in 2014, and in Phoenix only 84 percent. Exhibit 1: Dashboard, adjusted 20131 median wages for secondary school teachers for cost of living across select Western metros and made comparisons. Her team found that, after adjustment, Tucson and Phoenix come in last for median teacher pay among Western metros (see Exhibit 2). Pullen’s analysis concluded that ”when adjusted for cost of living, Tucson teachers earn only 66 percent of what their counterparts in San Courtesy of the Making Action Possible dashboard. As one might expect, teachers earned a whole lot more in San Diego with their median wage of $73,530. Now for something you might not expect: secondary school teachers in El Paso also earned substantially more than they did in Tucson. El Paso’s median secondary school teacher wage was $50,800. Phoenix also pays less than El Paso with its median wage of $47,230 (see Exhibit 1). A common argument for low teacher wages in Tucson is that the cost of living is less here when compared to other Western cities and to the nation overall. Jennifer Pullen, a research economist at the Economic and Business Research Center in the Eller College of Management and program director for the Making Action Possible 4 Diego earn, and in Phoenix 73 percent.” Would you go looking for work in San Diego if you thought you could get anything in the neighborhood of a 44 percent raise in real terms? Further, adjusted figures show the median secondary school teacher wage is only 70 and 78 percent of the national median in Tucson and Phoenix, respectively. Another statement often made when teacher wages are discussed is “teachers earn more than other workers in Tucson.” Yes, median wage of for secondary school teachers in 2014 ($38,240) was indeed higher than the median wage for all occupations ($32,510). However, as Pullen points out “the all-occupations median wage includes a large number of occupations with low educational Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Exhibit 2: Courtesy of the Making Action Possible dashboard. requirements.” In the U.S., nearly all secondary school teachers have bachelor’s degrees and over half have master’s degrees. As a result, secondary school teachers are expected to earn more than the overall workforce. This is why Pullen’s team chose to analyze relative median teacher pay across competitive markets in the West and make cost of living adjusted comparisons. “Research has shown that providing competitive wages for teachers has a significant effect on the decision to choose teaching as an occupation and remain in the field. Others have noted that insufficient compensation for teachers, in relation to other occupations, may affect turnover and student success”said Pullen. Visit the Making Action Possible Dashboard’s (MAP) Teacher Wages page for a detailed analysis and data on this important topic and follow the MAP on Twitter. Stay tuned for an in-depth report on the state of teacher wages in Tucson on the MAP coming in January 2016. 2013 is the most recent year for which purchasing power parity data are available from the U.S. Census Bureau in order to carry out a cost of living analysis. 1 Economic Impacts of Extending Arizona’s Border Zone by Maile L. Nadelhoffer, Senior Research Economist On October 6, at DATOS: Southern AZ Regional Overview – Hispanic Market Breakfast at the Hilton Tucson El Conquistador, Alberta Charney, Ph.D., faculty member and senior research economist at Eller’s Economic and Business Research Center (EBRC), presented results of a new study simulating economic impacts of extending Arizona’s border zone from the current 75 miles to include the entire state to a crowd of about 400. In 2015, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) requested that the UA conduct an economic impact analysis of this proposed extension on Mexican visitor spending in Arizona. Several regional planning agencies including MAG have long felt that allowing pre-cleared Mexican border crossing card holders the opportunity and flexibility to spend their tourist dollars throughout Arizona will invigorate tourism-sensitive economies in both rural and urban regions of the state. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 5 Arizona’s Economy Dr. Charney outlined calculations for baseline expenditures of Mexican visitors to Arizona from 2013 to 2016, and provided several “what if” scenarios including 1) an increase in all border crossers by three percent; 2) an increase in passenger crossers by three percent; and 3) increases of five percent, ten percent and fifteen percent in the number of Mexican travelers traveling north of the existing border zone. The analysis used data and detailed characteristics of Mexican visitors and their spending patterns obtained in an extensive 2007-2008 Mexican visitors study, conducted by EBRC for the Arizona Office of Tourism, combined with current and projected trends and volume of border crossings into Arizona. “The proposed extension could generate up to $181 million in additional estimated spending and 2,179 additional jobs in 2016,” concluded Charney, “and bring the total projected spending of Mexican visitors to Arizona to nearly $3.1 billion with a total jobs impact of 31,856.” “However, there are risks associated with these estimates” warned Charney, “if oil prices remain depressed long-term and the Mexican Peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate remains at historic highs, this could adversely affect Mexico’s overall economy and lower Mexican consumer spending and travel.” Read the entire report “Extending the Border Zone to the Entire State of Arizona: Estimated Expenditures and Economic Impact Simulations, 2013-2016.” After Dr. Charney’s remarks, study coauthor and EBRC research economist, Alan Hoogasian took the audience on a tour of EBRC’s new Arizona-Economic Indicators website sponsored by the Arizona-Mexico Commission, Arizona Commerce Authority, Arizona Department of Transportation, and Arizona Office of Tourism. The site offers over three thousand time series tracking trade and competiveness in the ArizonaMexico region. “What I think is really great about this site is that it is interactive,” said Hoogasian, “users can download all the data they see, click on a table to get a trend chart, or if they want to use a map or a chart in a presentation they can download it in multiple formats with a click.” All the data on this site are constantly updated and users are assured they have the most recent statistics. Economic data for Arizona at your fingertips download the free AZ Economy App today! Search on “Arizona’s Economy” in the iTunes App Store or on Google Play and download the Arizona’s Economy mobile app 2.0 for your iphone, ipad, or android phone today. 6 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Forecast Tables Arizona Personal Income ($ mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Retail Sales ($mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Total Nonfarm Employment (000s)   % Chg from Year Ago Population (000s), July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago Residential Building Permits (units)   % Chg from Year Ago Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA Personal Income ($ mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Retail Sales ($ mil)   % Chg from Prior Total Nonfarm Employment (000s)   % Chg from Year Ago Population (000s), July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 255,024 264,709 276,824 293,209 311,360 330,316 4.1% 3.8% 4.6% 5.9% 6.2% 6.1% 88,531 91,436 94,849 99,692 105,729 111,410 3.4% 3.3% 3.7% 5.1% 6.1% 5.4% 2,568.8 1.9% 6,667.2 2,626.7 2.3% 6,762.4 2,688.6 2.4% 6,869.6 2,764.7 2.8% 6,993.8 2,845.4 2.9% 7,121.1 2,926.8 2.9% 7,249.8 1.3% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 26,997 27,958 33,284 42,526 46,226 47,846 7.1% 3.6% 19.0% 27.8% 8.7% 3.5% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 178,029 186,556 196,640 208,838 222,319 236,698 4.5% 4.8% 5.4% 6.2% 6.5% 6.5% 61,920 64,352 66,965 70,530 75,371 79,749 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 5.3% 6.9% 5.8% 1,854.0 1,906.0 1,961.2 2,018.5 2,081.2 2,148.2 2.3% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 3.1% 3.2% 4,404.9 4,474.4 4,551.7 4,642.5 4,746.7 4,855.6 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 20,341 20,336 25,028 33,718 37,323 37,442   % Chg from Prior 8.6% 0.0% 23.1% 34.7% 10.7% 0.3% Tucson MSA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Personal Income ($ mil) 38,025 39,106 40,621 42,641 44,806 47,053   % Chg from Year Ago 3.0% 2.8% 3.9% 5.0% 5.1% 5.0% Residential Building Permits (units) Retail Sales ($ mil) 12,577 12,964 13,460 14,019 14,637 15,229   % Chg from Year Ago 1.6% 3.1% 3.8% 4.2% 4.4% 4.0% Total Nonfarm Employment (000s) 364.9 367.5 372.5 379.4 386.2 393.2   % Chg from Year Ago 0.5% 0.7% 1.4% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1,007.2 1,015.1 1,024.9 1,037.8 1,052.1 1,067.0 1.1% 0.8% 1.0% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% Population (000s), July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago Residential Permits (units) 3,250 3,654 3,796 4,412 4,893 5,012   % Chg from Year Ago -6.9% 12.4% 3.9% 16.2% 10.9% 2.4% >>Need More? Do you need more detailed and comprehensive forecast data and analysis? Learn about the benefits of becoming a Forecasting Project sponsor. Forecasting Project sponsorship allows your company or organization to access an in-depth menu of economic forecasting and consulting services, as well as, quarterly forecast update meetings. Contact Marshall Vest at mvest@eller.arizona.edu or call 520.621.4075. The Forecasting Project is a community-sponsored research unit within the Economic and Business Research Center producing quarterly economic forecasts for Arizona and its metro areas. These forecasts are recognized as among the most accurate in the Western states. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 7 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators Arizona - Labor Force and Employment, SA Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 Persons (000s, seasonally adjusted), Local Area Unemployment Statistics, BLS Civilian Labor Force % Chg from Year Ago Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate 3,145.8 3,141.1 3,144.4 3,148.6 3,158.5 2.1% 1.7% 1.5% 1.3% 1.4% 2,954.3 2,944.3 2,947.4 2,955.6 2,968.4 191.4 196.8 197.0 192.9 190.0 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.1 6.0 Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s, seasonally adjusted), Current Employment Statistics, BLS Total % Chg from Year Ago Total Private % Chg from Year Ago Goods Producing Mining and Logging 2,626.8 2,630.9 2,651.4 2,663.3 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.4% 2.5% 2,215.9 2,219.7 2,219.6 2,238.5 2,250.4 2.8% 297.7 2.7% 298.1 2.6% 297.8 2.8% 297.8 2.9% 302.2 12.8 12.6 12.5 12.1 12.0 Construction 129.6 129.2 130.2 129.6 133.4 Manufacturing 155.3 156.3 155.1 156.1 156.8 119.3 120.3 119.3 120.2 120.4 36.0 36.0 35.8 35.9 36.4 2,321.9 2,328.7 2,333.1 2,353.6 2,361.1 1,918.2 1,921.6 1,921.8 1,940.7 1,948.2 Durable Goods Non-Durable Goods Service Providing Private Service Providing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade 93.5 94.3 94.0 95.0 95.0 316.6 318.7 319.1 320.7 322.9 Transportation and Utilities 88.8 88.7 87.5 89.0 90.8 Information 43.8 43.3 43.6 44.2 44.7 Finance and Insurance 148.7 150.1 149.8 150.7 149.8 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 46.4 45.9 46.5 48.1 46.5 Professional and Business Services 398.3 394.3 394.5 399.2 399.3 134.6 134.8 134.5 135.8 135.9 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises Administrative and Support Waste Management and Remediation Services Educational Services Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services Government 30.6 30.4 31.0 31.0 31.4 233.1 229.1 229.0 232.4 232.0 58.7 60.9 59.8 61.6 61.4 334.6 336.4 335.4 336.4 339.8 40.4 40.5 40.0 41.1 41.6 254.7 255.3 258.2 260.1 261.6 93.7 93.2 93.4 94.6 94.8 403.7 407.1 411.3 412.9 412.9 -1.5% -0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% Federal Government 54.5 55.1 55.1 54.8 54.9 State Government 85.9 83.1 85.7 88.0 88.1 263.3 268.9 270.5 270.1 269.9 % Chg from Year Ago Local Government 8 2,619.6 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona Economic Indicators Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 23.02 23.36 23.25 23.31 23.49 % Chg from Year Ago 0.7% 2.6% 1.9% 2.5% 3.0% Arizona - Earnings, Sales, Housing, Bankruptcy Jul 2015 Average Hourly Earnings by Industry ($, not seasonally adjusted), BLS Total Private Construction 22.94 22.89 23.17 23.01 23.46 Manufacturing 24.50 24.57 24.28 24.59 24.85 Financial Activities 26.74 27.35 26.99 27.23 27.31 Professional and Business Services 26.15 26.67 26.53 26.53 26.71 Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 20.51 20.81 20.69 20.82 20.88 Education and Health Services 24.83 25.03 25.14 25.12 25.21 Leisure and Hospitality 13.94 14.02 14.10 14.15 14.23 7,402,393.7 7,369,357.6 7.4%   3.8%   Retail Sales 4,812,535.8 4,780,953.3 4,923,634.0 Food, EBRC** 1,012,754.5 1,007,109.9 1,016,960.6 Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales, EBRC* % Chg from Year Ago Restaurants & Bars 924,207.4 936,652.0 945,514.8 Gasoline, EBRC*** 660,000.6 652,969.2 552,722.9 Gallons, ADOT 233,628.5 239,007.8 228,021.0 1,151,548.0 1,160,559.5 1,064,554.0 213,758.4 204,858.4 197,529.0 91,369.3 82,105.0 80,741.3 Rentals Personal Property 332,738.6 271,621.0 287,908.0 Contracting 815,330.8 780,141.8 798,747.5 Hotel/Motel Utilities Communications Amusements 176,544.0 165,831.7 194,254.7 Mining, Oil, & Gas Production 35,621.4 12,998.1 10,593.1 Mining Severance 44,920.4 49,303.8 56,063.8 18,127.4 17,502.0 19,334.9 Printing Publishing Use Tax 9,389.3 7,226.7 7,218.0 440,451.8 573,863.7 474,574.1 3114 3168 2503 2617 34.0% 50.6% 34.6% 29.6% 2164 2066 1945 1862 37.9% 51.7% 23.5% 40.4% 34 34 24 16 916 1068 534 739 New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units   % Chg from Year Ago Single Family Units   % Chg from Year Ago 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Bankruptcy Filings, U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Arizona District Total   % Chg from Year Ago Chapter 7 Chapter 11 1491 1443 1433 -15.5% -11.1% -1.2% 1249 1218 1190 38 13 15 Chapter 13 204 212 228 *EBRC estimates Aggregate Retail Sales by summing Retail Sales (ADOR), Food Sales estimated by EBRC (food is not taxable in Arizona), Restaurant and Bar Sales (ADOR), and Gasoline Sales estimated by EBRC using number of gallons sold in Arizona (ADOT) and current tax rate on gasoline (ADOR). **estimated by EBRC. ***estimated by EBRC using gallons sold (ADOT) and tax rate (ADOR). ebr.eller.arizona.edu 9 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators Population and Vital Statistics - Arizona 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 6,401.6 6,438.2 6,498.6 6,581.1 6,667.2 0.2% 0.6% 0.9% 1.3% 1.3% 87.1 85.2 85.7 85.0 86.6 13.6 13.2 13.2 12.9 13.1 45.9 47.5 48.5 49.1 51.1 -16.6 10.9 34.2 48.5 55.5 Demographics and Vital Statistics (July 1st Estimates, 000s), ADHS, ADOA & EBRC Population % Chg from Year Ago Resident Births, July 1st estimates Birth Rate Resident Deaths Net Migration *This population figure is from the Arizona Dept. of Administration, rather than the official Census population count. EBRC feels this figure is more accurate. **Birth rate and net migration are both calculated by EBRC using data from the Arizona Dept. of Health Services. Arizona - Personal Income and Earnings Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC*   % Chg from Year Ago Average Earnings per Job ($), BEA**   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 34,240.9 35,867.3 37,114.7 37,024.0 38,260.6 1.3%   4.7%   3.5%   -0.2%   3.3%   46,664 47,943 49,265 49,376 50,661 1.7%   2.7%   2.8%   0.2%   2.6%   219,195.8 230,920.3 241,192.2 243,656.9 255,092.9 Personal Income Derivation ($ millions), BEA*** Total Personal Income   % Chg from Year Ago 1.4%   5.3%   4.4%   1.0%   4.7%   149,712.1 156,700.8 163,693.4 167,827.3 175,367.2 Less: Contributions for government social insurance 17,129.2 15,873.2 16,423.0 19,165.5 20,056.3 Plus: Adjustment for residence 1,250.9 1,243.5 1,334.5 1,281.9 1,365.2 Earnings by place of work Equals: Net earnings by place of residence 133,833.8 142,071.1 148,605.0 149,943.7 156,676.1 Plus: Dividends, interest, and rent 37,045.9 40,526.3 44,516.4 44,511.3 46,309.8 Plus: Personal current transfer receipts 48,316.1 48,322.9 48,070.8 49,201.9 52,107.0 Total Wages and salaries 109,289.5 113,662.6 119,041.4 122,598.2 127,815.2   % Chg from Year Ago -0.4%   4.0%   4.7%   3.0%   4.3%   Components of Earnings ($ millions), BEA*** Supplements to wages and salaries 25,521.8 26,408.1 26,755.2 27,696.0 28,869.3 Proprietors' income 14,900.8 16,630.0 17,896.8 17,533.1 18,682.7 Farm Nonfarm 85.0 542.8 318.6 675.6 559.2 14,815.7 16,087.2 17,578.2 16,857.4 18,123.5 *EBRC calulates per capita personal income using total personal income from BEA divided by population estimates from ADOA. ADOA counts differ from official Census counts, but EBRC considers them more accurate. **Average earnings per job is total earnings divided by total full-time and part-time employment. Earnings is the sum of three components of personal income--wages and salaries, supplements to wages and salaries, and proprietors’ income. BEA employment series for states and local areas comprises estimates of the number of jobs, full-time plus part-time, by place of work. Full-time and part-time jobs are counted at equal weight. Both employment for wages and salaries and proprietors’ employment are included. ***for detailed definitions, see BEA table SA4 “Personal Income and Employment by Major Component” 10 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona Economic Indicators Arizona - Travel and Tourism (monthly data) Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 International Border Crossings, Bureau of Transportation Statistics Total Border crossing data currently only available through June 2015.   % Chg from Year Ago Pedestrians Personal Vehicle Passengers Bus Passengers Please see AZMEX.eller.ariozna.edu for full data histories and detail. Trains   % Chg from Year Ago Trucks   % Chg from Year Ago Hospitality Employment (000s, not seasonally adjusted), BLS Leisure and Hospitality   % Chg from Year Ago Accommodation 291.2 292.4 294.6 298.5 301.5 4.9% 3.6% 3.7% 3.4% 3.8% 44.2 43.6 43.9 44.5 43.4 1.8% 0.7% 2.3% 2.5% -1.6% 176,544.0 165,831.7 194,254.7 13.5% 5.2% 9.3% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20,082.5 19,339.1 19,030.6 19,221.3 20,705.7 -3.6% -3.7% -1.6% 1.0% 7.7% 17,328.9 16,856.6 16,552.4 16,626.2 18,029.4 -3.4% -2.7% -1.8% 0.4% 8.4%   % Chg from Year Ago Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR Hotel/Motel   % Chg from Year Ago Arizona - Travel and Tourism, cont. Visits (000s) Arizona State and National Parks, NPS & ASPB Total Arizona   % Chg from Year Ago Northern Arizona   % Chg from Year Ago Historical 1,296.1 1,327.8 1,147.4 1,070.3 1,114.5 Scenic 6,297.4 6,190.5 6,369.7 6,521.0 6,935.8 Water-based 9,735.4 9,338.3 9,035.3 9,034.9 9,979.1 Southern Arizona 2,753.6 2,482.5 2,478.2 2,595.1 2,676.3 -4.4% -9.8% -0.2% 4.7% 3.1% 426.9 438.1 382.2 359.4 384.8 1,939.5 1,726.3 1,729.7 1,869.3 1,903.1 387.2 318.1 366.3 366.4 388.4 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 238.10 237.93 237.57 238.04 238.11   % Chg from Year Ago Historical Scenic Water-based Inflation and Prices - United States U.S. Consumer Price Indices (seasonally adjusted), BLS All Urban Consumers: All Items % Chg from Year Ago Western States - All Urban Consumers: All items % Chg from Year Ago U.S. Producer Price Index: All Commodities (seas. adj.), BLS % Chg from Year Ago 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 245.04 244.74 244.26 244.34 243.75 1.3% 1.3% 1.0% 1.1% 1.5% 193.90 -6.8% 192.20 -7.2% 189.10 -8.4% 187.70 -7.7% 185.90 -7.5% ebr.eller.arizona.edu 11 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Note our readers: For the MSAs and counties which follow, EBRC “taxable sales” (accrual basis) only run through May of 2015, hence that line is currently blank. This is due to a delay in reporting from the Arizona Department of Revenue. We hope to have this remedied in the next issue. Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale MSA - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Taxable Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 2,154.8 2,152.7 2,168.7 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 2,172.7 5.7 5.8 5.5 5.2 1,860.4 1,888.0 1,906.2 1,934.3 1,956.0 1,656.8 1,663.4 1,664.4 1,689.9 1,710.0 203.6 224.6 241.8 244.4 246.0 23.80 24.20 24.10 24.17 24.43 NA NA NA NA NA 2,416 2,495 1,855 1,817 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale MSA - Annual Data Population, ADOA* % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC** 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 4,200,427 4,227,601 4,273,897 4,338,672 4,404,888 0.3% 0.7% 1.1% 1.5% 1.5% 151,301,118 160,086,328 168,757,726 1.7% 5.8% 5.4% 0.9% 5.1% 35,944.0 37,631.0 38,965.0 38,655.0 39,846.0 170,239,926 178,871,199 Consumer Price Index (Phx-Mesa-Glndle MSA) All Urban Consumers: All items, BLS % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Tucson MSA (Pima County)- Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 459,673 461,557 471,490 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 471,601 6.2 6.1 5.7 5.5 355.4 362.1 371.4 375.0 382.0 291.4 291.0 291.9 294.8 300.5 64.0 71.1 79.5 80.2 81.5 22.01 22.15 22.15 22.28 22.22 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA NA Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 338 325 288 296 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Tucson MSA (Pima County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA* % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC** % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 981,168 986,081 990,380 996,046 1,007,162 -0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 33,001,217 34,539,779 35,590,889 35,784,754 37,198,714 0.8% 4.7% 3.0% 0.5% 4.0% 33,608 34,955 35,838 35,855 37,031 0.1% 4.0% 2.5% 0.1% 3.3% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. 12 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Flagstaff MSA (Coconino County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 75.0 73.8 74.6 73.7 7.2 6.9 6.4 6.3 65.4 65.7 67.2 67.0 65.6 47.6 47.4 47.2 46.7 45.6 15.2 15.4 17.1 17.6 17.6 18.09 18.16 18.26 18.21 18.56 Taxable Sales: Total ($ Accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA NA Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 45 35 24 214 Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Flagstaff MSA (Coconino County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA*   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC**   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 134,679 134,162 134,313 135,695 139,372 0.8% -0.4% 0.1% 1.0% 2.7% 4,603,037 4,819,660 4,978,754 5,127,921 5,399,899 0.2% 4.7% 3.3% 3.0% 5.3% 34,177.8 35,924.2 37,068.3 37,790.1 38,744.5 -0.6% 5.1% 3.2% 2.0% 2.5% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Lake Havasu City - Kingman MSA (Mohave County) Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate (not seas. adj.), BLS Total Nonfarm Employment, (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 12.4 12.2 12.1 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 12.0 9.0 8.5 8.3 7.5 45.9 46.1 45.8 46.0 45.9 38.4 38.5 38.3 38.3 38.3 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.7 7.6 19.24 19.53 19.57 18.74 19.63 Gross Taxable Sales ($, accrual) NA NA NA NA NA Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 64 51 50 43 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Lake Havasu City-Kingman MSA (Mohave County) Annual Data Population, July 1st estimate, ADOA   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income, EBRC   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 75,210 75,840 77,683 77,900 77,922 0.1% 0.8% 2.4% 0.3% 0.0% 5,143,789 5,219,541 5,347,552 5,396,628 5,633,946 1.0% 1.5% 2.5% 0.9% 4.4% 25,706 26,043 26,333 26,507 27,617 1.1% 1.3% 1.1% 0.7% 4.2% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 13 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Prescott MSA (Yavapai County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 96.3 96.6 96.9 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 97.2 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.5 59.2 60.5 61.6 62.4 49.8 50.5 51.0 51.7 51.9 9.4 10.0 10.6 10.7 10.7 62.6 19.26 18.86 18.85 18.87 19.37 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA NA Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 83 76 107 73 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Prescott MSA (Yavapai County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA*   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC**   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 210,899 211,247 211,583 213,294 215,357 -0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.8% 1.0% 6,077,340 6,345,155 6,591,170 6,811,155 7,172,392 0.1% 4.4% 3.9% 3.3% 5.3% 28,816 30,037 31,152 31,933 33,305 0.6% 4.2% 3.7% 2.5% 4.3% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Sierra Vista - Douglas MSA (Cochise County) Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 51.0 50.7 50.3 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 50.2 7.9 8.0 7.6 7.2 33.5 34.0 34.2 34.5 34.5 22.6 22.6 22.5 22.9 22.8 10.9 11.4 11.7 11.6 11.7 20.26 21.20 20.98 21.88 22.21 NA NA NA NA NA 13.0 17.0 19.0 11.0 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Sierra Vista - Douglas MSA (Cochise County) Annual Data 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Population, ADOA* 51,329 50,893 50,908 51,269 51,104 -3.6% -0.9% 0.0% 0.7% -0.3% 4,570,411 4,736,361 4,678,914 4,593,193 4,679,941 2.2% 3.6% -1.2% -1.8% 1.9% 34,773 36,284 35,785 35,088 36,103 1.3% 4.3% -1.4% -2.0% 2.9%   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000)   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($)**   % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. 14 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Yuma MSA (Yuma County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 97.8 96.4 92.4 Oct 2015 Nov 2015 90.7 26.8 27.0 26.1 23.2 48.3 49.9 50.5 51.5 Private 34.9 35.5 35.9 36.8 37.7 Government 13.4 14.4 14.6 14.7 14.8 20.30 20.11 20.10 19.78 19.36 NA NA NA NA NA 44.0 58.0 62.0 71.0 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 52.5 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Population, ADOA* 60,057 60,522 61,500 63,007 63,718   % Chg from Year Ago -0.5% 0.8% 1.6% 2.5% 1.1% 5,323,706 5,622,247 5,586,005 5,838,101 5,841,652 3.0% 5.6% -0.6% 4.5% 0.1% 27,140 28,051 27,226 27,890 27,553 2.2% 3.4% -2.9% 2.4% -1.2% Yuma MSA (Yuma County) - Annual Data Total Personal Income ($000)   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($)**   % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. TABLES: SOURCES AND ABBREVIATIONS ADHS: Arizona Department of Health Services ADOA: Arizona Department of Administration, Office of Employment and Population Statistics ADOR: Arizona Department of Revenue ADOT: Arizona Department of Transportation ARMLS: Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service ASPB: Arizona State Parks Board BEA: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor Census C-40: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce Micropolitan SA: Micropolitan Statistical Area must have at least one urban cluster of at least 10,000, but less than 50,000 inhabitants. EBR: The Economic and Business Research Center, The University of Arizona. MSA: Metropolitan Statistical Area must have at least one core urbanized area of 50,000 or more inhabitants. PSHIA: Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport SAAR: Seasonally adjusted at annual rates TAR: Tucson Association of Realtors U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Arizona USCBP: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security BTS: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation NPS: National Parks Service * All Aggregate Retail Sales figures reported by EBR include retail, food, restaurant & bars and gasoline sales. Source: Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 15 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - Counties Apache County Summary - Monthly Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS 21.3 21.0 21.3 20.9 20.3 Unemployment Rate 13.6 14.8 13.7 13.2 12.7 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 18.0 17.6 18.5 18.4 18.1 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 10.6 10.2 11.1 11.0 10.8 NA NA NA NA NA Private Government Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Gila County (Payson Micropolitan SA) Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 22.1 22.0 21.8 21.4 21.1 7.8 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.0 15.2 15.0 15.3 15.1 15.0 Private 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.8 Government 5.2 5.1 5.4 5.2 5.2 NA NA NA NA NA Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 7 13 12 7 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Graham County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS 12 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 14.8 14.7 14.7 14.9 15.0 Unemployment Rate 7.3 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.4 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 8.7 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.1 Private 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 Government 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.3 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Greenlee County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS NA Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 Unemployment Rate 7.5 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.6 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Private 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Government 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. 16 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona NA January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - Counties Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 8.8 7.6 5.1 8.8 7.8 5.2 8.2 8.1 5.1 7.7 8.2 5.1 7.8 7.5 5.2 Private 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 Government 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 La Paz County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment, ADOA Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA NA NA NA *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Navajo County (Show Low Micropolitan SA) Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Private Government Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* NA Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 42.2 41.4 42.0 41.4 40.7 9.6 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.2 27.6 26.8 28.1 28.0 27.8 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.3 18.2 9.4 8.7 9.8 9.8 9.7 NA NA NA NA NA New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 14 12 19 14 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. 13 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep 2015 Oct 2015 Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS 20.0 19.9 19.9 19.8 19.7 Unemployment Rate 10.6 14.2 14.4 14.6 13.7 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Santa Cruz County Summary - Monthly 13.3 12.6 12.8 12.8 12.9 Private 9.7 9.1 9.1 9.0 9.2 Government 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 12 6 4 3 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 6 17 January, 2016 Winter Issue Arizona’s Economy Economic and business research center McClelland Hall, Room 103 P.O. Box 210108 1130 E. Helen Street Tucson, AZ, 85721-0108 George W. Hammond, Ph. D. Director (520) 626-1679 ghammond@eller.arizona.edu Alberta Charney, Ph.D. Senior Research Economist (520) 621-2291 acharney@eller.arizona.edu Alan Hoogasian Research Economist (520) 626-6439 ahoogasi@eller.arizona.edu Daniel Kinnear Specialist, Business Research (520) 626-1673 dkinnear@eller.arizona.edu Pia Montoya Database Specialist (520) 621-2523 pmontoya@eller.arizona.edu Maile L. Nadelhoffer Research Economist & Webmaster (520) 621-4050 mln@eller.arizona.edu Vera Pavlakovich-Kochi, Ph.D. Senior Regional Scientist & Associate Professor of Geography (520) 626-0520 vkp@eller.arizona.edu Heather Peterson Technical Consultant (520) 621-4050 thpeterson@comcast.net Jennifer Pullen Research Economist (520) 626-4795 jkanipe@email.arizona.edu Valorie Rice Senior Specialist, Business Information (520) 621-2109 vrice@eller.arizona.edu Phone: 520-621-2155 Fax: 520-621-2150 E-mail: ebrpublications@eller.arizona.edu To subscribe to Arizona’s Economy or other Economic and Business Research Publications, visit: ebr.eller.arizona.edu/subscribe/ Arizona’s Economy, published quarterly by the Economic and Business Research Center at the Eller College of Management, is provided as an educational service by The University of Arizona. Correspondence should be addressed to EBR Publications, McClelland Hall Room 103, PO Box 210108, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108. Arizona’s Economy is available online at: azeconomy.eller.arizona.edu As part of The University of Arizona’s public mission to improve quality of life for the people of Arizona and the nation, the Economic and Business Research Center is dedicated to providing Arizona citizens and decision makers with high quality economic data and objective forecasts and analyses. Copyright 2015 by The University of Arizona. Information contained in this publication may be copied or reprinted with credit to the Eller College of Management at The University of Arizona. >> Visit us online at ebr.eller.arizona.edu! Thank you to our community sponsors for their ongoing support of Economic and Business Research Center programs. Arizona Department of Transportation Elliott D. Pollack and Company Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee JPMorgan Chase & Co. Arizona Public Service Company Maricopa Association of Governments BBVA Compass Maricopa County CBRE Pima Association of Governments City of Mesa Pima County City of Phoenix Salt River Project City of Tempe Tucson Electric Power Company City of Tucson Special thanks to for its ongoing support of the Economic and Business Research Center website! ebr.eller.arizona.edu