October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona’s Economy Economic and business research center Arizona’s 30-Year Outlook: Bigger, Richer….Slower By George W. Hammond, Ph.D., EBR Director and Research Professor benchmark estimates, the state added almost 59,000 jobs in the second quarter, over the year. That translated into 2.3% growth, down from 2.7% in the first quarter, but faster than the national rate in the second quarter of 2.2%. A rizona grew much faster than the nation during the 30 years before the Great Recession. The latest 30-year outlook suggests that the state will continue to outpace the nation in terms of job, population, and real income growth. That means the state will have millions more jobs and residents in 2045 that it does today. Further, even after adjusting for inflation, Arizonans can expect to experience a higher level of per capita personal income than ever before. Even though the state will continue to expand in the future, growth rates will gradually decelerate, as Arizona, like the nation, adjusts to the aging of the Baby Boom generation. Arizona Recent Developments Arizona job growth softened in the second quarter compared to its rapid first quarter pace. According to our internal In this issue As Exhibit 1 shows, most sectors added jobs over the year. The largest gains were in professional & business services and education & health services, although leisure & hospitality; trade, transportation & utilities; and financial activities posted solid increases as well. Government jobs were up slightly over the year, reflecting modest gains in the federal government sector. That was the first over-the-year gain in federal employment since late 2010. Job gains in the goods-producing sector were weaker than in the serviceproviding sector. Natural resources & mining employment declined, which likely reflected falling commodity prices and a rapidly rising dollar. Construction jobs were up slightly, a welcome change from recent losses. Manufacturing jobs were also up a bit, boosted by gains in nondurable industries. Durable manufacturing jobs continued to decline, driven by losses in the computer & electronic products sector and aerospace. The Phoenix MSA added jobs at a faster pace than the state in the second quarter, with a rate of 3.1% over the year. That was down from the first quarter rate of 3.5%. All major sectors added jobs over the year, with the largest increases September 1, 2015 in professional & business services; education & health services; and trade, transportation & utilities. Job growth in the Tucson MSA was positive over the year, hitting at 0.5% in the second quarter. As with the Phoenix MSA and the state, that was slower than its 1.1% growth rate in the first quarter. Job growth was more mixed in Tucson, with gains in professional & business services, leisure & hospitality, education & health services, financial activities, and other services partially offset by losses in government; trade, transportation, & utilities; construction; and manufacturing. The U.S. Census Bureau released final estimates for Arizona housing permits in 2014. Total permits rose 7.1% in 2014, to 26,997. A 48.8% increase in multifamily activity more than offset the 8.4% decline in single-family permits. Total housing permits for the Phoenix MSA rose 8.6% last year, while the Tucson MSA experienced a 6.9% decline. Arizona Outlook in the Long Run Arizona is forecast to grow rapidly during the next 30 years, exceeding the national growth rate for many indicators. However, after near-term acceleration, growth gradually decelerates, reflecting the demographic aging of the Baby Boom generation. Overall, Arizona’s growth is not forecast to return to rates experienced during the 30 years before the Great Recession. Photo of business man and elephant Shutterstock.com Arizona’s 30-Year Outlook: Bigger, Richer….Slower Third Quarter 2015 Forecast Update. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Not As Young As We Used To Be. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Housing Affordability in Pima County – Rent vs. Own. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Forecast Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona Economic Indicators: State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona Economic Indicators: Metro Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona Economic Indicators: Counties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 12 16 20 Arizona’s Economy Exhibit 1: Most Major Industries in Arizona Added Jobs During the Past Year Net Change in Jobs, 2014q2 to 2015q2, and Average Annual Wages per Worker, 2014 1 Professional and Business Services $51,949 19.2 2 Educational and Health Services $47,676 12.1 3 Leisure and Hospitality $21,240 8.0 Trade, Transportation and Utilities $41,994 4 6.6 Financial Activities $63,008 5 6.1 Other Services $33,387 6 5.1 Information $64,695 7 1.2 Manufacturing $70,720 8 0.4 Construction $48,637 9 0.4 Government $49,024 10 0.4 Natural Resources and Mining $45,353 11 Avg. Wages/Worker, 2014: $46,919 -0.3 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 thousands The forecast calls for the state to add 1.8 million jobs and 3.8 million residents during the next 30 years, to reach 4.4 million jobs and 10.5 million residents by 2045. Overall, job growth averages 1.8% per year during the next 30 years, which is faster than the expected U.S. growth rate of 0.7% per year. However, it is slower than the state’s average rate of job growth during the 30 years prior to the Great Recession. As Exhibit 2 shows, job growth speeds up modestly in the near term, followed by slower, but still positive, gains beginning early in the next decade. Exhibit 2: Arizona and U.S. Job Growth in the Long Run Annual Growth Rates percent Arizona and the U.S. 6 4 Arizona 2 0 U.S. -2 -4 -6 00 2 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona 40 45 -8 October, 2015 Fall Issue Annual Growth Rates Overall, real per capita personal income is forecast to rise by 1.5% per year during the forecast, which implies a rising standard of living for state residents. However, that is slightly below growth expected for the nation (1.6% per year). This means that the state’s per capita personal income gap with the U.S. (currently at 17.2%) will expand during the forecast period. Both the Phoenix and Tucson MSAs are expected to expand during the next 30 years. The Phoenix MSA is forecast to add just over 3.0 million residents, to reach a population of 7.5 million by 2045. Phoenix adds 1.5 million jobs from 2015-2045, which translates into an average growth rate of 2.0% per year. Real personal income growth in Phoenix is forecast to average 3.2% per year, which works out to 1.5% per year growth in real per capita personal income. The Tucson MSA also adds jobs, residents, and real income during the forecast, with population reaching 1.4 million by 2045. Population growth averages 1.2% per year, while job gains come at a slightly more rapid pace of 1.4% per year. That means gradual increases in Tucson’s job-to-population ratio, which rises from 36.2% in 2015 to 39.1% by 2045. Even with the expected improvement, the Tucson MSA ratio remains well below the state and national level. Overall, real per capita personal income is forecast to rise by 1.5% per year during the forecast, which implies a rising standard of living for state residents...Both the Phoenix and Tucson MSAs are expected to expand during the next 30 years. The Phoenix MSA is forecast to add just over 3.0 million residents, to reach a population of 7.5 million by 2045...The Tucson MSA also adds jobs, residents, and real income during the forecast, with population reaching 1.4 million by 2045. Want to know more? Contact George Hammond (ghammond@eller.arizona.edu) about the benefits of becoming a Forecasting Project sponsor! ebr.eller.arizona.edu 3 Arizona’s Economy Not As Young As We Used To Be by Valorie Hanni Rice, Senior Specialist, Business Information The Midwest first year since 2000 that Arizona has not placed in the top 10. Arizona experienced decades of increases in its youth population ranking 22nd in 1984, 13th in 1994, and 10th in the 2000 Census. However, Arizona was not the only state to age considerably in the rankings between 2004 and 2014 – California dropped from 5th to 17th. Since Arizona is no longer in the top 10, it is interesting to examine which states gained youth and moved up in the rankings (see Table). states of South Dakota, Kansas, and Nebraska, along with Oklahoma, made the leap into the top 10, replacing Arizona and its neighboring states of Nevada, California, and New In 2014, Arizona’s population under 18 was 24.1%, which ranked the state as the 11th youngest state in the nation. This is a decline from a decade ago, when Arizona ranked 4th with 26.9% under 18, and is the Mexico. Table: States Ranked by Percent of Population Under 18 top 20 2014 Percent under 18 4 2004 Percent under 18 1 Utah 30.7 1 Utah 31.0 2 Idaho 26.4 2 Alaska 28.7 3 Texas 26.4 3 Texas 27.9 4 Alaska 25.3 4 Arizona 26.9 5 Kansas 24.9 5 California 26.7 6 Nebraska 24.8 6 Idaho 26.7 7 Georgia 24.7 7 Georgia 26.4 8 South Dakota 24.7 8 New Mexico 25.9 9 Oklahoma 24.6 9 Nevada 25.9 10 Mississippi 24.4 10 Mississippi 25.8 11 Arizona 24.1 11 Louisiana 25.8 12 New Mexico 24.1 12 Indiana 25.7 13 Indiana 24 13 Colorado 25.6 14 Louisiana 23.9 14 Illinois 25.5 15 Arkansas 23.8 15 Maryland 25.1 16 Wyoming 23.7 16 Michigan 25.1 17 California 23.6 17 Kansas 25.0 United States 25.0 18 Minnesota 23.5 18 Nebraska 24.9 19 Iowa 23.4 19 North Carolina 24.8 20 Nevada 23.4 20 New Jersey 24.8 Utah remains at the top of the list in the same position it was in 2004 with 30.7%. It is followed by Idaho, Texas, Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska, Georgia, South Dakota, Oklahoma, and Mississippi. The Midwest states of South Dakota, Kansas, and Nebraska, along with Oklahoma, made the leap into the top 10, replacing Arizona and its neighboring states of Nevada, California, and New Mexico. The state with the largest gain in ranking was Wyoming, moving from 40th in 2004 to 16th in 2014, while Michigan took the largest dive, going from 16th down to 36th. The trend over the decade indicates a smaller percent of children in the population overall. In 2004, 25.0% of the U.S. population was under 18, yet by 2014 that figure was down to 23.1%. Even Utah, with the highest ranking in both years, had a slightly smaller percentage of under 18 population in 2014 (30.7) than in 2004 (31.0). Only four states have a higher percentage of population under 18 now versus a decade ago. They are North Dakota, Wyoming, Iowa, and Oklahoma. Arizona is among the four states which experienced the greatest decline in the percentage of young population. Only California, New Hampshire and Alaska had larger decreases than Arizona. Despite the lower percent of young people and a fall in ranking for 2014, Arizona still has a higher percentage of youth than the U.S. as a whole (24.1% vs. 23.1%). Photo of kids in Northern Arizona Shuttersock.com Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue The trend over the decade indicates a smaller percent of children in the population overall...Despite the lower percent of young people and a fall in ranking for 2014, Arizona still has a higher percentage of youth than the U.S. as a whole (24.1% vs. 23.1%). Table: States Ranked by Percent of Population Under 18 (con’t) states ranked 21 - 50 2014 Percent under 18 2004 Percent under 18 21 Colorado 23.3 21 South Dakota 24.8 22 Illinois 23.2 22 Arkansas 24.6 United States 23.1 23 Missouri 23.0 23 South Carolina 24.4 24 North Carolina 23.0 24 Oklahoma 24.4 25 Kentucky 22.9 25 Minnesota 24.3 26 Alabama 22.8 26 Ohio 24.3 27 North Dakota 22.8 27 Virginia 24.2 28 Ohio 22.8 28 Alabama 24.2 29 Tennessee 22.8 29 Missouri 24.1 30 Washington 22.7 30 Washington 24.0 31 Maryland 22.6 31 Connecticut 23.9 32 Wisconsin 22.6 32 New York 23.8 33 New Jersey 22.5 33 Wisconsin 23.7 34 Michigan 22.4 34 Oregon 23.7 35 South Carolina 22.4 35 Hawaii 23.7 36 Virginia 22.4 36 Kentucky 23.6 37 Montana 22 37 Tennessee 23.6 38 Delaware 21.8 38 New Hampshire 23.5 39 Hawaii 21.7 39 Delaware 23.3 40 Connecticut 21.6 40 Wyoming 23.1 41 Oregon 21.6 41 Iowa 23.0 42 New York 21.4 42 Florida 23.0 43 Pennsylvania 21.1 43 Pennsylvania 22.9 44 Massachusetts 20.6 44 Massachusetts 22.8 45 West Virginia 20.5 45 Rhode Island 22.6 46 Florida 20.4 46 Montana 22.5 47 Rhode Island 20.2 47 North Dakota 21.9 48 New Hampshire 20.1 48 Vermont 21.7 49 Maine 19.5 49 Maine 21.4 50 Vermont 19.4 50 West Virginia 21.2 ebr.eller.arizona.edu 5 Arizona’s Economy Housing Affordability in Pima County – Rent vs. Own by Jennifer Pullen, Research Economist In 2013, more as healthcare, childcare, transportation, and even food. than half of the renters in Pima County were housing cost burdened, almost double the percentage of homeowners. Shutterstock.com M ore than one third of households in Pima County were housing cost burdened in 2013. When households are broken down by tenure (renter vs owner), renters on average are almost twice as likely to be housing cost burdened than owners. Housing cost burden is an important measure of a household’s well-being because cost burdened households, those that spend more than 30% of their income on housing expenditures (including utilities), are more likely to struggle to pay for basic needs such Exhibit 1: Pima County and Arizona had a similar percentage of households that were housing cost burdened in 2013 (37.8% and 37.1%, respectively), and both posted slightly higher rates than the U.S. (36.6%). All three regions have seen a significant increase in the percentage of cost burdened households since 2000. The U.S. posted an increase of 9.0 percentage points, while Arizona and Pima County increased by 8.5 and 7.6 percentage points respectively (see Exhibit 1). In 2013, more than half of the renters in Pima County were housing cost burdened, almost double the percentage of homeowners. In Pima County 28.7% of homeowners were cost burdened, similar to the state (29.6%) and the U.S. (28.7%). On the other hand, renters in Pima County had a higher housing cost burden then those in the state and the U.S. with 54.0% paying more than 30% of their income in housing costs. In Pima County, homeowners without a mortgage were significantly less Photo of SW house Shuttersock.com Percent of Housing Cost Burdened Households 6 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Exhibit 2: Percent of Housing Cost Burdened Households by Tenure, 2013 likely to be housing cost burdened (13.4%) when compared to owners with a mortgage (36.6%). Homeowners without a mortgage incur housing costs such as: taxes, insurance, and utilities (see Exhibit 2). Cities located throughout Pima County displayed wide variation in the percentage of households that were cost burdened in 2013. Green Valley had the lowest percentage of cost burden households (23.0%), while South Tucson the highest (53.0%). The city of Tucson posted a housing cost burden rate of 43.1%, 5.3 percentage points higher than the county (see Exhibit 3). During 2013, homeowners located in cities throughout Pima County were significantly less cost burdened than renters. Green Valley had the lowest percentage of homeowners that were cost burdened at 17.5%, while South Tucson and the city of Tucson posted the highest rates at 39.4% and 30.1% respectively. Homeowners can be broken down into those with and without a Exhibit 3: Percent of Housing Cost Burdened Households (2013) ebr.eller.arizona.edu 7 Arizona’s Economy Exhibit 4: Percent of Housing Cost Burdened Households (2013) Homeowners without a mortgage tend to be less housing cost burdened than those with a mortgage. mortgage. Homeowners without a mortgage tend to be less housing cost burdened than those with a mortgage. Marana posted the largest percentage of cost burdened households without a mortgage at 14.6%, followed closely by the city of Tucson (14.0%) and Ajo (12.7%). Ajo had the largest percentage of cost burdened renters of any city (63.0%), not only within Pima County, but of any city in Southern Arizona with a population greater than 4,000. Data for select cities is not presented when the estimates are not sufficiently precise. In Pima County, Sahuarita was the only city with a population greater than 4,000 that posted a housing cost burden for renters below 40.0%. Marana and Oro Valley followed closely behind with 41.4% and 42.6% of their respective renters being designated as cost burdened. In contrast, Learn more about the housing cost burden for the Arizona counties, metropolitan areas, states, and the U.S. by visiting the Housing Cost Burden Indicator page on the Making Action Possible for Southern Arizona (MAP) website (http:// mapazdashboard.arizona.edu/). Detailed Exhibit 5: Percent of Housing Cost Burdened Renters (2013) 8 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue information on the housing cost burden by trend, tenure, age, and income is available. Additional information about the Housing Cost Burden by tenure for the Southern Arizona cities can be found here. Please note that all estimates provided in this article were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) five-year estimates in order to directly compare city, county, state, and U.S. data. Data for many of the cities located in Southern Arizona is only available from the ACS five-year estimates. Housing Cost Burden data for Arizona counties, metropolitan areas, states, and the U.S. found elsewhere on the MAP utilizes the ACS three-year estimates, hence you may find slight differences in the values reported. To learn more about the housing cost burden for the Arizona counties, metropolitan areas, states, and the U.S. please visit the Housing Cost Burden indicator. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 9 Arizona’s Economy Real-time Economic Data for Arizona in a New UA App! Search on “Arizona’s Economy” in the iTunes App Store or Google Play and download the new Arizona’s Economy mobile app for your iphone, ipad, or android phone today. >>Keeping Current Arizona’s Economy is published quarterly by the Economic and Business Research Center in the Eller College of Management. For continuous updates of Arizona’s economic indicators, check out our website’s Indicators page: http://azeconomy.eller.arizona.edu/az_indicators/ There you can browse indicators by geography or topic and graph each series by clicking on the series title. If you wish to be notified each quarter when a new issue of Arizona’s Economy becomes available, please send an email to EBRPublications.eller.arizona.edu with your name and contact information. Please put “subscribe” in the header line. We do not share our mailing list. 10 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Forecast Tables Arizona Personal Income ($ mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Retail Sales ($mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Total Nonfarm Employment (000s)   % Chg from Year Ago Population, July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago Residential Building Permits (units)   % Chg from Year Ago Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA Personal Income ($ mil)   % Chg from Year Ago Retail Sales ($ mil)   % Chg from Prior Total Nonfarm Employment (000s)   % Chg from Year Ago Population (000s), July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 255,024 264,709 276,824 293,209 311,360 330,316 4.1% 3.8% 4.6% 5.9% 6.2% 6.1% 88,531 91,436 94,849 99,692 105,729 111,410 3.4% 3.3% 3.7% 5.1% 6.1% 5.4% 2,568.8 1.9% 6,667,241.0 2,626.7 2.3% 6,762,406.0 2,688.6 2.4% 6,869,596.0 2,764.7 2.8% 6,993,779.0 2,845.4 2.9% 7,121,080.0 2,926.8 2.9% 7,249,750.0 1.3% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 26,997 27,958 33,284 42,526 46,226 47,846 7.1% 3.6% 19.0% 27.8% 8.7% 3.5% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 178,029 186,556 196,640 208,838 222,319 236,698 4.5% 4.8% 5.4% 6.2% 6.5% 6.5% 61,920 64,352 66,965 70,530 75,371 79,749 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 5.3% 6.9% 5.8% 1,854.0 1,906.0 1,961.2 2,018.5 2,081.2 2,148.2 2.3% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 3.1% 3.2% 4,404.9 4,474.4 4,551.7 4,642.5 4,746.7 4,855.6 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 20,341 20,336 25,028 33,718 37,323 37,442   % Chg from Prior 8.6% 0.0% 23.1% 34.7% 10.7% 0.3% Tucson MSA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Personal Income ($ mil) 38,025 39,106 40,621 42,641 44,806 47,053   % Chg from Year Ago 3.0% 2.8% 3.9% 5.0% 5.1% 5.0% Residential Building Permits (units) Retail Sales ($ mil) 12,577 12,964 13,460 14,019 14,637 15,229   % Chg from Year Ago 1.6% 3.1% 3.8% 4.2% 4.4% 4.0% Total Nonfarm Employment (000s) 364.9 367.5 372.5 379.4 386.2 393.2   % Chg from Year Ago 0.5% 0.7% 1.4% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1,007.2 1,015.1 1,024.9 1,037.8 1,052.1 1,067.0 1.1% 0.8% 1.0% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% Population (000s), July 1st estimates   % Chg from Year Ago Residential Permits (units) 3,250 3,654 3,796 4,412 4,893 5,012   % Chg from Year Ago -6.9% 12.4% 3.9% 16.2% 10.9% 2.4% >>Need More? Do you need more detailed and comprehensive forecast data and analysis? Learn about the benefits of becoming a Forecasting Project sponsor. Forecasting Project sponsorship allows your company or organization to access an in-depth menu of economic forecasting and consulting services, as well as, quarterly forecast update meetings. Contact Marshall Vest at mvest@eller.arizona.edu or call 520.621.4075. The Forecasting Project is a community-sponsored research unit within the Economic and Business Research Center producing quarterly economic forecasts for Arizona and its metro areas. These forecasts are recognized as among the most accurate in the Western states. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 11 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators Arizona - Earnings, Sales, Housing, Bankruptcy Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Persons (000s, seasonally adjusted), Local Area Unemployment Statistics, BLS Civilian Labor Force % Chg from Year Ago Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate 3,163.9 3,165.3 3,156.2 3,145.8 3,141.3 3.0% 3.0% 2.6% 2.1% 1.7% 2,973.1 2,981.1 2,971.5 2,954.3 2,944.4 190.8 184.2 184.8 191.4 196.9 6.0 5.8 5.9 6.1 6.3 Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s, seasonally adjusted), Current Employment Statistics, BLS Total % Chg from Year Ago Total Private % Chg from Year Ago Goods Producing Mining and Logging 2,610.4 2,611.6 2,619.6 2,623.4 2.2% 2.3% 1.9% 2.1% 2.0% 2,199.7 2,203.7 2,205.1 2,215.9 2,218.2 2.5% 296.1 2.5% 295.6 2.5% 295.2 2.8% 297.7 2.7% 298.4 12.9 12.7 12.6 12.8 12.6 Construction 127.7 127.0 127.2 129.6 129.7 Manufacturing 155.5 155.9 155.4 155.3 156.1 119.5 119.4 119.6 119.3 120.4 36.0 36.5 35.8 36.0 35.7 Durable Goods Non-Durable Goods Service Providing Private Service Providing Wholesale Trade 2,317.1 2,314.8 2,316.4 2,321.9 2,325.0 1,903.6 1,908.1 1,909.9 1,918.2 1,919.8 92.2 91.9 92.7 93.5 94.5 316.1 314.6 315.3 316.6 319.1 Transportation and Utilities 88.4 88.9 88.9 88.8 89.2 Information 43.4 43.1 43.7 43.8 43.2 145.0 147.0 147.1 148.7 150.1 47.7 47.1 45.7 46.4 46.2 391.0 394.7 395.7 398.3 392.8 132.6 133.6 134.0 134.6 135.6 Retail Trade Finance and Insurance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Professional and Business Services Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises Administrative and Support Waste Management and Remediation Services Educational Services Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services Government % Chg from Year Ago 30.0 30.0 30.3 30.6 30.3 228.4 231.1 231.4 233.1 226.9 60.6 59.7 61.1 58.7 60.8 331.0 332.0 333.2 334.6 336.3 38.9 39.9 40.3 40.4 40.2 254.9 254.9 252.6 254.7 254.6 94.4 94.3 93.6 93.7 92.8 413.5 406.7 406.5 403.7 405.2 0.9% 1.1% 1.0% -1.5% -1.2% Federal Government 55.4 55.1 55.0 54.5 55.1 State Government 87.4 80.5 85.4 85.9 83.1 270.7 271.1 266.1 263.3 267.0 Local Government 12 2,613.2 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona Economic Indicators May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 23.1 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.4 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 2.7% Construction 23.5 22.6 22.7 22.9 22.9 Manufacturing 24.7 24.6 24.1 24.5 24.4 Arizona - Earnings, Sales, Housing, Bankruptcy Apr 2015 Average Hourly Earnings by Industry ($, not seasonally adjusted), BLS Total Private % Chg from Year Ago Financial Activities 26.4 26.4 26.7 26.7 27.5 Professional and Business Services 26.5 26.3 26.4 26.2 26.7 Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 20.6 20.8 20.5 20.5 20.8 Education and Health Services 24.7 24.6 24.7 24.8 25.1 Leisure and Hospitality 14.0 14.0 13.8 13.9 14.0 7,748,842.1 8,020,544.9 7,549,799.6 4.3% 7.3% 4.9% Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales, EBRC* % Chg from Year Ago Retail Sales 5,015,144.3 5,193,695.6 4,932,073.8 4,812,535.8 Food, EBRC** 1,081,281.8 1,072,048.6 1,056,418.6 1,005,650.0 Restaurants & Bars 1,100,786.8 1,109,057.4 940,331.4 924,207.4 547,712.7 645,743.4 620,975.9 Gasoline, EBRC*** 235,778.2 235,586.8 225,399.6 Utilities Gallons, ADOT 654,948.8 735,850.6 898,235.9 1,151,548.0 Communications 202,229.9 214,600.7 173,946.7 213,758.4 98,138.7 100,234.0 138,995.1 91,369.3 Amusements Rentals Personal Property 286,603.5 290,595.4 274,143.2 332,738.6 Contracting 764,344.9 785,692.8 834,239.1 815,330.8 Hotel/Motel 263,435.5 230,193.8 178,395.4 176,544.0 Mining, Oil, & Gas Production 11,015.0 9,116.7 12,254.0 35,621.4 Mining Severance 65,466.4 93,103.7 56,253.8 44,920.4 Printing 20,784.3 18,260.2 18,202.3 18,127.4 Publishing 9,644.6 8,873.7 7,322.9 9,389.3 447,366.9 419,124.0 492,456.9 440,451.8 3080 2710 3115 % Chg from Year Ago 14.6% 9.5% 25.4% Single Family Units 2154 2129 2245 34.0% 30.2% 19.6% 34 18 26 892 563 844 Use Tax New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units % Chg from Year Ago 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Bankruptcy Filings, U.S. Bankruptcy Court - Arizona District Total % Chg from Year Ago Chapter 7 Chapter 11 1637 1435 1472 1491 -16.5% -26.2% -11.1% -15.5% 1423 1239 1274 1249 17 27 6 38 Chapter 13 197 169 192 204 *EBRC estimates Aggregate Retail Sales by summing Retail Sales (ADOR), Food Sales estimated by EBRC (food is not taxable in Arizona), Restaurant and Bar Sales (ADOR), and Gasoline Sales estimated by EBRC using number of gallons sold in Arizona (ADOT) and current tax rate on gasoline (ADOR). **estimated by EBRC. ***estimated by EBRC using gallons sold (ADOT) and tax rate (ADOR). ebr.eller.arizona.edu 13 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators 2010 Population and Vital Statistics - Arizona 2011 2012 2013 2014 6,401.6 6,438.2 6,498.6 6,581.1 6,667.2 0.2% 0.6% 0.9% 1.3% 1.3% Demographics and Vital Statistics (July 1st Estimates, 000s), ADHS & EBRC Population % Chg from Year Ago Resident Births, July 1st estimates Birth Rate Resident Deaths Net Migration 22.4 21.4 21.2 21.4 21.4 13.6 13.2 13.2 12.9 13.1 11.3 11.8 12.0 12.4 12.3 -16.6 10.9 34.2 48.5 55.5 *This population figure is from the Arizona Dept. of Administration, rather than the official Census population count. EBRC feels this figure is more accurate. **Birth rate and net migration are both calculated by EBRC using data from the Arizona Dept. of Health Services. Arizona - Personal Income and Earnings Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC* % Chg from Year Ago Average Earnings per Job ($), BEA** % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 34,031.6 35,680.8 36,920.3 37,238.8 38,260.0 0.8% 4.8% 3.5% 0.9% 2.7% 46,783 48,081 49,335 49,981 1.9% 2.8% 2.6% 1.3% 217,855.6 229,719.2 239,929.3 245,070.5 Personal Income Derivation ($ millions), BEA*** Total Personal Income % Chg from Year Ago 255,088.7 1.0% 5.4% 4.4% 2.1% 4.1% 149,982.1 156,986.4 163,835.2 169,520.8 175,779.4 17,263.8 16,012.8 16,560.1 19,335.8 20,208.3 684.8 714.4 771.8 781.0 838.4 133,403.1 141,688.0 148,046.9 150,965.9 156,409.4 36,940.9 40,521.0 44,062.8 45,102.0 46,743.9 47,511.7 47,510.1 47,819.6 49,002.5 51,935.3 Total Wages and salaries 109,293.1 113,663.4 119,043.1 122,564.2 127,250.4 % Chg from Year Ago -0.4% 4.0% 4.7% 3.0% 3.8% Supplements to wages and salaries 25,650.9 26,544.4 26,824.7 27,751.9 28,573.3 Proprietors' income 15,038.1 16,778.6 17,967.4 19,204.7 19,955.7 Earnings by place of work Less: Contributions for government social insurance Plus: Adjustment for residence Equals: Net earnings by place of residence Plus: Dividends, interest, and rent Plus: Personal current transfer receipts Components of Earnings ($ millions), BEA*** Farm Nonfarm 222.4 691.4 231.0 293.2 344.2 14,815.7 16,087.2 17,736.4 18,911.5 19,611.5 *EBRC calulates per capita personal income using total personal income from BEA divided by population estimates from ADOA. ADOA counts differ from official Census counts, but EBRC considers them more accurate. **Average earnings per job is total earnings divided by total full-time and part-time employment. Earnings is the sum of three components of personal income--wages and salaries, supplements to wages and salaries, and proprietors’ income. BEA employment series for states and local areas comprises estimates of the number of jobs, full-time plus part-time, by place of work. Full-time and part-time jobs are counted at equal weight. Both employment for wages and salaries and proprietors’ employment are included. ***for detailed definitions, see BEA table SA4 “Personal Income and Employment by Major Component” 14 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona Economic Indicators Arizona - Travel and Tourism (monthly data) Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 14,811,952 15,447,170 14,610,468 3.1% 6.6% 6.3% Jul 2015 Aug 2015 International Border Crossings, BTS Total % Chg from Year Ago Pedestrians Personal Vehicle Passengers 3,339,210 3,453,359 3,207,279 11,258,592 11,791,328 11,190,705 214,150 202,483 212,484 820 839 842 Bus Passengers Trains % Chg from Year Ago Trucks % Chg from Year Ago 3.5% -2.2% -0.2% 475,780 468,216 481,539 1.6% -1.3% 7.8% 301.6 300.2 293.5 291.2 291.4 3.1% 3.5% 3.4% 4.9% 3.3% Hospitality Employment (000s, not seasonally adjusted), BLS Leisure and Hospitality % Chg from Year Ago Accommodation 45.7 44.4 44.5 44.2 43.6 2.0% -1.6% -0.7% 1.8% 0.7% 263,435.5 230,193.8 178,395.4 176,544.0 5.3% 9.6% 8.0% 13.5% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20,082.5 19,339.1 19,030.6 19,221.3 20,705.7 -3.6% -3.7% -1.6% 1.0% 7.7% 17,328.9 16,856.6 16,552.4 16,626.2 18,029.4 -3.4% -2.7% -1.8% 0.4% 8.4% % Chg from Year Ago Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR Hotel/Motel % Chg from Year Ago Arizona - Travel and Tourism, cont. Visits (000s) Arizona State and National Parks, NPS & ASPB Total Arizona % Chg from Year Ago Northern Arizona % Chg from Year Ago Historical 1,296.1 1,327.8 1,147.4 1,070.3 1,114.5 Scenic 6,297.4 6,190.5 6,369.7 6,521.0 6,935.8 Water-based 9,735.4 9,338.3 9,035.3 9,034.9 9,979.1 Southern Arizona 2,753.6 2,482.5 2,478.2 2,595.1 2,676.3 % Chg from Year Ago -4.4% -9.8% -0.2% 4.7% 3.1% Historical 426.9 438.1 382.2 359.4 384.8 1,939.5 1,726.3 1,729.7 1,869.3 1,903.1 387.2 318.1 366.3 366.4 388.4 Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 235.98 237.03 237.79 238.10 237.93 Scenic Water-based Inflation and Prices - United States Consumer Price Index (1982-84=100), BLS All Urban Consumers: All Items % Chg from Year Ago Western States - All Urban Consumers: All items % Chg from Year Ago Producer Price Index for All Commodities % Chg from Year Ago -0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 242.30 244.23 244.33 245.04 244.74 1.0% 1.2% 1.1% 1.3% 1.3% 190.90 192.90 194.70 194.00 192.20 -8.4% -7.3% -6.5% -6.7% -7.2% ebr.eller.arizona.edu 15 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Note our readers: For the MSAs and counties which follow, EBRC “taxable sales” (accrual basis) only run through May of 2015, hence that line is currently blank. This is due to a delay in reporting from the Arizona Department of Revenue. We hope to have this remedied in the next issue. Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale MSA - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 2,158.9 2,160.4 2,164.2 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 2,154.3 4.8 4.6 5.4 5.7 1,904.3 1,895.0 1,865.2 1,860.4 1,886.5 1,660.0 1,659.7 1,655.3 1,656.8 1,663.8 244.3 235.3 209.9 203.6 222.7 23.9 23.8 23.7 23.8 24.2 2,415 2,046 2,321 2,416 Taxable Sales ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale MSA - Annual Data Population, ADOA* % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC** Consumer Price Index (Phx-Mesa-Glndle MSA) All Urban Consumers: All items, BLS % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 4,200,427 4,227,601 4,273,897 4,338,672 4,404,888 0.3% 0.7% 1.1% 1.5% 1.5% 148,818,951 158,157,229 166,556,387 170,430,508 1.1% 6.3% 5.3% 2.3% 35,429.5 37,410.6 38,970.6 39,281.7 118.23 121.48 124.20 125.78 127.82 0.6% 2.8% 2.2% 1.3% 1.6% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Tucson MSA (Pima County)- Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Private, $, BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 470,576 470,036 462,974 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 460,275 5.1 4.9 5.9 6.2 372.2 369.6 357.8 355.4 361.3 292.9 292.2 291.7 291.4 289.6 79.3 77.4 66.1 64.0 71.7 21.8 21.9 21.9 22.0 22.2 291 338 407 338 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Tucson MSA (Pima County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA* % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC** % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 981,168 986,081 990,380 996,046 1,007,162 -0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 33,883,172 35,132,468 36,412,855 36,935,363 0.5% 3.7% 3.6% 1.4% 34,534 35,628 36,767 37,082 0.8% 3.2% 3.2% 0.9% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. 16 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Flagstaff MSA (Coconino County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 73.4 73.4 75.5 75.0 5.7 5.6 6.6 7.2 66.2 65.6 66.1 65.4 65.7 46.0 46.5 47.3 47.6 47.4 17.6 16.3 15.8 15.2 15.4 18.17 17.87 18.11 18.09 18.02 33 25 17 Taxable Sales: Total ($ Accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Flagstaff MSA (Coconino County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA*   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC**   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 134,679 134,162 134,313 135,695 139,372 2.7% 0.8% -0.4% 0.1% 1.0% 4,529,627 4,631,539 4,746,702 4,906,294 0.1% 2.3% 2.5% 3.4% 33,632.8 34,522.0 35,340.6 36,156.8 -0.7% 2.6% 2.4% 2.3% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Lake Havasu City - Kingman MSA (Mohave County) Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (not seas. adj.), BLS Unemployment Rate (not seas. adj.), BLS Total Nonfarm Employment, (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 79,056.0 78,718.0 79,357.0 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 79,209.0 7.4 7.1 8.1 8.7 46.5 46.0 46.4 46.1 45.9 39.1 38.7 38.5 38.4 38.5 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.5 7.6 18.98 19.06 18.70 19.24 20.07 56 50 68 64 Gross Taxable Sales ($, accrual) Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Lake Havasu City-Kingman MSA (Mohave County) Annual Data Population, July 1st estimate, ADOA   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income, BEA   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income, EBRC   % Chg from Year Ago 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 75,210 75,840 77,683 77,900 77,922 0.0% 0.1% 0.8% 2.4% 0.3% 5,232,506 5,407,834 5,546,309 5,679,043 1.4% 3.4% 2.6% 2.4% 26,150 26,983 27,312 27,894 1.5% 3.2% 1.2% 2.1% *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 17 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Prescott MSA (Yavapai County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 98.9 98.0 97.9 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 96.8 5.2 4.8 5.8 6.0 61.0 60.0 60.8 60.4 61.3 Private 50.8 50.1 50.0 49.8 50.6 Government 11.1 10.6 9.9 9.4 10.3 18.18 18.08 18.59 19.26 18.87 90 70 86 83 Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private, $, BLS Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. Prescott MSA (Yavapai County) - Annual Data Population, ADOA*   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000), BEA 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 210,899 211,247 211,583 213,294 215,357 -0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.8% 1.0% 6,245,478 6,498,204 6,800,376 6,992,574   % Chg from Year Ago -0.4% 4.1% 4.7% 2.8% Per Capita Personal Income ($), EBRC** 29,614 30,761 32,140 32,784 0.0% 3.9% 4.5% 2.0%   % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. Sierra Vista - Douglas MSA (Cochise County) Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Private Government Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 50.7 51.1 51.3 51.0 7.1 6.7 7.6 7.9 34.3 34.4 33.6 33.5 34.2 22.5 22.6 22.5 22.6 22.7 11.8 11.8 11.1 10.9 11.5 20.57 20.50 20.28 20.26 21.19 25.0 22.0 24.0 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Sierra Vista - Douglas MSA (Cochise County) Annual Data 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Population, ADOA* 51,329 50,893 50,908 51,269 51,104 -3.6% -0.9% 0.0% 0.7% -0.3% 4,695,244 4,869,173 4,803,928 4,740,219 2.2% 3.7% -1.3% -1.3% 35,723 37,301 36,741 36,211 1.4% 4.4% -1.5% -1.4%   % Chg from Year Ago Total Personal Income ($000)   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($)**   % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. 18 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - MSAs Yuma MSA (Yuma County) - Monthly Data Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), BLS Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 91.3 94.4 93.7 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 98.1 22.2 23.1 22.8 26.6 51.2 50.7 48.2 48.3 50.0 Private 36.4 36.1 34.9 34.9 35.6 Government 14.8 14.6 13.3 13.4 14.4 20.45 20.34 20.44 20.30 20.10 68.0 77.0 61.0 Average Hourly Earnings, Total Private ($), BLS Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* Total New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona's "Transaction Privilege Tax," does not include food or gasoline sales. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Population, ADOA* 60,057 60,522 61,500 63,007 63,718   % Chg from Year Ago -0.5% 0.8% 1.6% 2.5% 1.1% 5,289,911 5,512,842 5,427,233 5,529,669 2.5% 4.2% -1.6% 1.9% 26,967 27,505 26,452 26,417 1.7% 2.0% -3.8% -0.1% Yuma MSA (Yuma County) - annual data Total Personal Income ($000)   % Chg from Year Ago Per Capita Personal Income ($)**   % Chg from Year Ago *Population counts as of July 1st. ADOA population estimates differ from official Census Bureau estimates. EBRC considers ADOA counts to be the most accurate. **BEA total personal income divided by ADOA population estimates. TABLES: SOURCES AND ABBREVIATIONS ADHS: Arizona Department of Health Services ADOA: Arizona Department of Administration, Office of Employment and Population Statistics ADOR: Arizona Department of Revenue ADOT: Arizona Department of Transportation ARMLS: Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service ASPB: Arizona State Parks Board BEA: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor Census C-40: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce Micropolitan SA: Micropolitan Statistical Area must have at least one urban cluster of at least 10,000, but less than 50,000 inhabitants. EBR: The Economic and Business Research Center, The University of Arizona. MSA: Metropolitan Statistical Area must have at least one core urbanized area of 50,000 or more inhabitants. PSHIA: Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport SAAR: Seasonally adjusted at annual rates TAR: Tucson Association of Realtors U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Arizona USCBP: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security BTS: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation NPS: National Parks Service * All Aggregate Retail Sales figures reported by EBR include retail, food, restaurant & bars and gasoline sales. Source: Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 19 Arizona’s Economy Arizona Economic Indicators - Counties Apr 2015 May 2015 Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS 20.6 21.0 21.3 21.0 Unemployment Rate 12.6 12.1 13.6 14.8 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 18.2 18.4 18.0 17.6 18.6 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.5 10.8 11.0 10.6 10.2 11.1 Apache County Summary - Monthly Private Government Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Gila County (Payson Micropolitan SA) Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 21.4 21.7 22.1 22.0 7.4 6.9 7.8 8.5 Aug 2015 15.1 15.2 15.2 15.0 15.3 Private 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 Government 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.4 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 8 8 7 13 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.7 Unemployment Rate 6.6 6.5 7.3 8.0 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.6 8.8 Private 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.9 Government 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.8 3.0 Graham County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Aug 2015 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Unemployment Rate 6.8 6.7 7.5 8.1 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Private 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Government 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 Greenlee County Summary - Monthly Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. 20 Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona Aug 2015 October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona Economic Indicators - Counties Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 8.1 7.6 5.2 8.4 7.1 5.2 8.8 7.6 5.1 8.8 7.8 5.2 5.0 Private 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 Government 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 La Paz County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment, ADOA Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Navajo County (Show Low Micropolitan SA) Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 41.2 41.9 42.2 41.4 Aug 2015 8.9 8.4 9.6 10.5 27.8 28.1 27.6 26.8 27.9 Private 17.7 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Government 10.0 10.1 9.4 8.7 9.6 Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 14 16 14 12 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. Santa Cruz County Summary - Monthly Civilian Labor Force (000s), BLS Unemployment Rate Total Nonfarm Employment (000s), ADOA Private Government Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 20.1 20.3 20.0 19.9 9.3 9.1 10.6 14.2 Aug 2015 13.8 13.8 13.3 12.6 12.8 10.0 10.0 9.7 9.1 9.1 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.7 Taxable Sales: Total ($000s, accrual), ADOR* New Residential Permits (units), Census C-40 8 6 12 6 *Total of all collection categories covered by Arizona’s “Transaction Privilege Tax,” does not include food or gasoline sales. ebr.eller.arizona.edu 21 October, 2015 Fall Issue Arizona’s Economy Economic and business research center McClelland Hall, Room 103 P.O. Box 210108 1130 E. Helen Street Tucson, AZ, 85721-0108 George W. Hammond, Ph. D. Director (520) 626-1679 ghammond@eller.arizona.edu Alberta Charney, Ph.D. Senior Research Economist (520) 621-2291 acharney@eller.arizona.edu Alan Hoogasian Research Economist (520) 626-6439 ahoogasi@eller.arizona.edu Daniel Kinnear Specialist, Business Research (520) 626-1673 dkinnear@eller.arizona.edu Pia Montoya Database Specialist (520) 621-2523 pmontoya@eller.arizona.edu Maile L. Nadelhoffer Research Economist & Webmaster (520) 621-4050 mln@eller.arizona.edu Vera Pavlakovich-Kochi, Ph.D. Senior Regional Scientist & Associate Professor of Geography (520) 626-0520 vkp@eller.arizona.edu Heather Peterson Technical Consultant (520) 621-4050 thpeterson@comcast.net Jennifer Pullen Research Economist (520) 626-4795 jkanipe@email.arizona.edu Valorie Rice Senior Specialist, Business Information (520) 621-2109 vrice@eller.arizona.edu Phone: 520-621-2155 Fax: 520-621-2150 E-mail: ebrpublications@eller.arizona.edu To subscribe to Arizona’s Economy or other Economic and Business Research Publications, visit: ebr.eller.arizona.edu/subscribe/ Arizona’s Economy, published quarterly by the Economic and Business Research Center at the Eller College of Management, is provided as an educational service by The University of Arizona. Correspondence should be addressed to EBR Publications, McClelland Hall Room 103, PO Box 210108, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108. Arizona’s Economy is available online at: azeconomy.eller.arizona.edu As part of The University of Arizona’s public mission to improve quality of life for the people of Arizona and the nation, the Economic and Business Research Center is dedicated to providing Arizona citizens and decision makers with high quality economic data and objective forecasts and analyses. Copyright 2015 by The University of Arizona. Information contained in this publication may be copied or reprinted with credit to the Eller College of Management at The University of Arizona. >> Visit us online at ebr.eller.arizona.edu! Thank you to our community sponsors for their ongoing support of Economic and Business Research Center programs. Arizona Department of Transportation Elliott D. Pollack and Company Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee JPMorgan Chase & Co. Arizona Public Service Company Maricopa Association of Governments BBVA Compass Maricopa County CBRE Pima Association of Governments City of Mesa Pima County City of Phoenix Salt River Project City of Tempe Tucson Electric Power Company City of Tucson Special thanks to for its ongoing support of the Economic and Business Research Center website! ebr.eller.arizona.edu