INSIDE: A P R I L 2 0 0 6 • S P R I N G A Poor Report Card Doesn’t Deter Growth By Marshall J. Vest Forecasting Project Director March 1, 2006 The data for 2005 continues to arrive, and it shows that Arizona’s economy was even stronger than previously imagined. Moreover, bellwether data for employment and personal income are likely to be revised significantly higher in coming months. How else can doubledigit growth in tax collections be reconciled? After all the revisions for 2005 are in, employment will have grown in the 5-6% range, wage increases will top five percent, and I S S U E Arizona is the Fifth-Youngest State – pg. 4 Forecast Tables – pg. 5 UA Contributes to State Economy – pg. 6 Phoenix is a Great Place for Women Business Owners – pg. 8 Arizona Economic Indicators – pg. 9 After surging during the fiscal year ending last June, tax collections for the state’s general fund continued strong through year end. For the six months from July through December, sales and use taxes increased 17.1%, individual income taxes by 22.1% and corporate income taxes by 16.3%, compared to the same period one year earlier. Even after adjusting for a boost to withholding schedules that took effect in January 2005, individual income tax collections were still ahead of last year by nearly 18%. After removing the effects of inflation, these increases are among the largest ever recorded. Meanwhile, published data for employment shows growth of only 4.1%. With data for the first three quarters, personal income is reported to be growing by less than 9%. Both measures will be revised higher in coming weeks: employment growth may approach 6% and personal income could top 10%. Together the two measures suggest that average pay scales increased in the 5-6% range, a very strong gain that no doubt reflects a resurgence from bonuses and stock options that today are offered across many industries. Recently, the Arizona Department of Economic Security recently released population estimates for mid-year 2005. These show that the number of Arizona residents increased by over 210,000 last year, a growth rate of 3.7%. That is the largest numerical increase ever recorded and the fastest growth since the 4.4% gain of 1995. According to DES, Arizona now has 6.045 million residents (making it the 16th most populated state). personal income growth may exceed ten A Poor Report Card for Arizona percent. As 2006 begins, the Arizona Arizona may be experiencing a boom and rank as the second-fastest growing state in the nation, but the Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED) recently gave Arizona D’s on its economic report card. Arizona has never scored well on this annual study that’s been published since 1987. The study assigns grades to each state on “how well its economy is doing for its people… and its businesses, and how well the state is preparing economy has a full head of steam, but the pace will moderate as the year progresses due to less exuberant consumer spending and the return of more “normal” real estate activity. www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu for the future.” Measures include sixty-eight aspects of economic health organized into three indexes: performance, business vitality, and development capacity. The performance index is comprised of five measures: employment (which garnered an A due to Arizona’s rapid growth), earnings and job quality (D due to poor employer health coverage and large proportions of working poor), equity (D due to a wide and worsening income gap), quality of life (D due to high How is it percentages of uninsured lowincome children and teen that Arizona pregnancies, low voting rates, low scores so home ownership rates, and the worst crime rate in the country), poorly, yet is and resource efficiency (B the second highlighted by low per capita energy consumption). Overall grade = D. fastest The business vitality index is growing comprised of two measures: competitiveness of existing state in the businesses and entrepreneurial country? energy. The competitiveness component received an F for low scores on “strength of traded sector”, business closings, and manufacturing investment. The entrepreneurial component received a C with low scores for growth of new companies counterbalanced by job growth in new businesses and a large portion of employment in technology industries. Overall grade = D. Finally, development capacity is made up of five components: human resources (D due to low scores on student proficiency in reading and math, low teacher salaries, low K-12 education expenditures and the highest high school dropout rate in the country), financial resources (D due to loans for small businesses), infrastructure resources (B with the best bridge deficiency rating in the country), amenity resources and natural capital (F due to high cost of housing, poor air quality, and conversion of cropland), and innovation assets (B with high rankings for R&D, university spin-outs and patents issued). Overall grade = D. Arizona was among only five states that scored Ds or Fs in each of the three dimensions. Mississippi, West Virginia, New Mexico and Alaska were the other bottom dwellers. Critics argue that grades from the development report card correlate poorly with growth. After all, how is it that Arizona scores so poorly, yet is the second fastest growing state in the country? How does one explain that those economic dynamos, Massachusetts and Minnesota, received the highest grades? Arizona, they continue, is widely viewed as pro business, retiree-friendly, and a land of endless possibilities. These criticisms aside, the study is useful in identifying Arizona’s perceived weaknesses. Arizona is portrayed as a state of haves-and-have-nots, with a mediocre workforce, troubled public schools, and poor quality of life due to various social ills. This is not the image desired by elected officials and economic developers who dream of and promote a state with a highly skilled work force, an idyllic setting, and an economy driven by high technology and creative thinking. How will policy makers close this gap? EXHIBIT 1 Resale Housing Has Stabilized Existing Home Sales, 000s (Source: MLS) Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate Real Estate Update For the past few years, real estate has been the turbo charger for Arizona’s growth engine. Money poured in from all over the country, especially from over-priced housing markets in California and Las Vegas, thereby driving homebuilding to record levels and sending home prices soaring. Commercial construction also found new life as demand for retail, office, and industrial space strengthened. The construction industry normally accounts for 5-7 percent of total jobs, but in recent years it provided nearly one-fourth of all new jobs. In short, growth industries have been driving growth. What we’ve just experienced is a once or twice in a generation surge in real estate investment. In the late 1990’s, money poured into high tech. Since the high tech boom went bust, the investment focus has been on real estate (and not just here in Arizona, but around the world). The frenzy in last summer’s real estate markets all but disappeared as 2005 came to a close. Bidding wars that resulted in homes selling for tens-of-thousands of dollars more than asking price have disappeared, along with Saturday morning lines of potential homebuyers hoping to get their name on the list for the next lottery drawing used to allocate who gets to buy a new home. Open house signs are once again popping up (for a while houses were selling EXHIBIT 3 Permits Have Peaked Single Family Building Permits, 000s (Source: Census C-40) Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate What we’ve just experienced is a once or twice in a generation surge in real estate investment. 2. EXHIBIT 2 Home Prices Are Plateauing Median Price of Homes Sold, $000s (Source: MLS) Seasonally Adjusted, Smoothed EXHIBIT 4 Spending to Lag Income Growth Real Consumer Spending and Income Growth, AZ % change so fast, realtors didn’t have a chance to hold them open). Inventories of homes for sale have increased back to normal levels, and houses are selling for less than asking price. Housing markets are getting back to normal once again. With data through the end of the year, we see that the number of homes sold through the MLS has flattened out in both metros Tucson and Phoenix. Sales peaked in metro Phoenix during last year’s first quarter, while Tucson sales have plateaued (Exhibit 1). Data reported by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the Federal Office of Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) both show moderating home prices in recent months. Data for the fourth quarter show that metro Phoenix led the nation for price increases year-on-year with a 48.9% increase. That was slower than the 55.2% increase registered during the prior quarter. Metro Tucson had the second-fastest gain in the West, with an increase of 32.2%. Again, that was slower than the third quarter’s 34.7% gain. OFHEO data for the third quarter show deceleration as well, not only in AZ but in California and Nevada metros as well. This data provides quarter-over-prior-quarter annual rates (as opposed to year-on-year from NAR) and therefore gives a more current picture of price trends. In the third quarter, the annual rate of appreciation in metro Phoenix was 37.7%, down from a 51.3% pace in the prior quarter. Similar results as seen for metro Tucson (28.3% versus 37.6%). Southern California cities and Las Vegas, which experienced rapid increases earlier and serve as a leading indicator for Arizona, recorded much more moderate increases in the third quarter: Los Angeles prices rose at a 19.7% annual rate, Las Vegas up 9.3%, and San Diego up 7.1%. Prices in those markets are plateauing and serve as a harbinger for Arizona. Data from local Multiple Listing Services show similar results. The median price of homes sold on the MLS has declined recently in metro Phoenix after an amazing surge during 2004 and 2005. In December the median price was $330,000, up from $245,000 the year before. In metro Tucson, prices are flattening out and are much lower (at $220,000 up from $169,000) than in Phoenix, (Exhibit 2). Slowing can also be seen in new home construction, as single family permitting in both metros is below its peak. In metro Phoenix, the decline in the latter part of 2004 was payback from accelerated permitting prior to a boost in impact fees in the summer of 2004. After falling about 15%, permits in metro Phoenix have been moving upward during the past year. In metro Tucson, permits peaked in the spring of 2005 and are down about 10% so far (Exhibit 3). With data through the end of the year, we see that the number of homes sold through the MLS has flattened out in both metros Tucson and Phoenix. 3. The mania that swept through these markets has evaporated, but that doesn’t mean disaster looms. We expect these measures to flatten or give back modest amounts in months to come, but strong population growth will limit the downside. Also, commercial construction will remain robust in the near term. One question now is, where will the “hot” money go next? Financial markets, collectibles, commodities? A second question is, now that real estate is no longer a driver of growth, what sector is going to take its place? One possibility: business investment spending, which promises expansion for Arizona’s high tech industries. It’s time for the hot money to seek business opportunities once again. The Outlook We continue to expect Arizona’s economy to slow as the year progresses. Real estate will become a neutral factor or even a slight drag rather than the major source of growth. Consumers will spend less freely as slower appreciation of homes and higher interest rates limit homeowners access to extra cash. Fortunately, job creation and tightening labor markets will drive wages higher, and the combination will prop up spending. But after two years of spending growth exceeding that of income gains, we’ll see the opposite going forward. After adjusting for inflation, spending will grow two percentage points slower than incomes over the next three years. This mirrors the years 1996-98 which followed a spending surge in 1993-94 that was even stronger than what we experienced during the past two years (Exhibit 4). Overall, 2006 will be another year of solid expansion for the Arizona economy. The following year is more uncertain. One of the top forecasters in the country, Jim Smith from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, predicts a recession in 2007, due to over tightening by the Federal Reserve Bank. For the time being, we’ll stick with a forecast of continuing expansion in 2007, just at a slower pace. Stay tuned. ■ Arizona is the Fifth-Youngest State By Valorie Rice Arizona is young in comparison with the rest of the United States. The Census Bureau recently released state level population estimates that include a tabulation of those over 18 years old. According to the figures, Arizona is the fifth- youngest state with 26.6% of our population under the age of 18. The four states with populations even younger than ours are Utah (30.1%), Alaska (28.4%), Texas (27.7%) and California (26.9%) while the United States as a whole has 24.8% of the population under 18 years. Despite the perception that Arizona is an older state, the data shows that we are, in fact, quite young. The percentage of young people in Arizona hasn’t changed much – it was at 26.6 in 2000 as well – but the number of other states younger than us has fallen. We were the tenth-youngest state in 2000 and now stand at fifth. ■ Arizona was the tenthyoungest state in 2000 and now stands at fifth. Source: Population Estimates Program, U.S. Bureau of the Census Estimates of the Total Resident Population and Resident Population Age 18 Years and Older for the United States and States: July 1, 2005 (Released January 2006) 2005 Population Estimate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 UNITED STATES Utah Alaska Texas California Arizona Idaho Georgia Nevada Indiana Mississippi Illinois Louisiana New Mexico Colorado Maryland Michigan New Jersey North Carolina Kansas Nebraska Arkansas South Dakota Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina Virginia Minnesota Alabama Connecticut Missouri New York Washington Hawaii Kentucky Wisconsin Oregon Tennessee Delaware New Hampshire Florida Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania Iowa Wyoming Montana North Dakota Vermont West Virginia Maine Overall, 2006 will be another year of solid expansion for the Arizona economy. The following year is more uncertain. 4. 2005 Population Estimate 296,410,404 2,469,585 663,661 22,859,968 36,132,147 5,939,292 1,429,096 9,072,576 2,414,807 6,271,973 2,921,088 12,763,371 4,523,628 1,928,384 4,665,177 5,600,388 10,120,860 8,717,925 8,683,242 2,744,687 1,758,787 2,779,154 775,933 11,464,042 3,547,884 4,255,083 7,567,465 5,132,799 4,557,808 3,510,297 5,800,310 19,254,630 6,287,759 1,275,194 4,173,405 5,536,201 3,641,056 5,962,959 843,524 1,309,940 17,789,864 6,398,743 1,076,189 12,429,616 2,966,334 509,294 935,670 636,677 623,050 1,816,856 1,321,505 % under 18 yrs 24.8 30.1 28.4 27.7 26.9 26.6 26.2 26.0 25.7 25.6 25.6 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.3 25.1 24.9 24.8 24.7 24.6 24.5 24.3 24.3 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.0 23.9 23.8 23.8 23.6 23.6 23.5 23.5 23.4 23.3 23.3 23.2 23.1 22.9 22.8 22.8 22.7 22.6 22.4 21.9 21.4 21.3 21.1 21.0 F O R E C A S T Arizona Personal Income ($ mill) percent change Wage per Employee percent change Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* percent change Population (000s, mid-year) percent change Residential Permits percent change Non Farm Employment (000s) percent change Goods-Producing percent change Service-Providing percent change Trade, Trans., & Utilities percent change Prof. & Business Services percent change Leisure & Hospitality percent change Government percent change Phoenix-Mesa Metro Area Personal Income ($ mill) percent change Wage per Employee percent change Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* percent change Population (000s, mid-year) percent change Residential Permits percent change Non Farm Employment (000s) percent change Goods-Producing percent change Service-Providing percent change Trade, Trans., & Utilities percent change Prof. & Business Services percent change Leisure & Hospitality percent change Government percent change Tucson Metro Area Personal Income ($ mill) percent change Wage per Employee percent change Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* percent change Population (000s, mid-year) percent change Residential Permits percent change Non Farm Employment (000s) percent change Goods-Producing percent change Service-Providing percent change Trade, Trans., & Utilities percent change Prof. & Business Services percent change Leisure & Hospitality percent change Government percent change T A B L E S 2005 178,119 8.4 39,852 4.5 73,873 11.7 6,028.3 3.4 86,245 0.6 2,483.7 4.6 394.5 5.1 2,089.4 4.6 484.2 4.9 359.6 7.8 250.7 3.8 412.1 2.9 2006 194,839 9.4 41,518 4.2 79,666 7.8 6,228.6 3.3 80,644 -6.5 2,601.6 4.7 409.3 3.7 2,192.5 4.9 506.2 4.5 391.7 8.9 261.4 4.2 425.1 3.2 2007 210,245 7.9 43,199 4.0 84,686 6.3 6,431.1 3.3 80,666 0.0 2,694.1 3.6 412.4 0.8 2,281.8 4.1 523.8 3.5 416.6 6.4 268.7 2.8 437.0 2.8 2008 225,539 7.3 44,940 4.0 88,970 5.1 6,624.4 3.0 77,793 -3.6 2,772.4 2.9 420.1 1.9 2,352.5 3.1 536.6 2.4 432.4 3.8 275.5 2.5 445.3 1.9 2009 243,919 8.1 46,878 4.3 93,988 5.6 6,822.6 3.0 79,386 2.0 2,866.9 3.4 430.1 2.4 2,437.1 3.6 553.5 3.2 452.9 4.7 284.4 3.2 456.2 2.5 2010 264,103 8.3 48,904 4.3 99,748 6.1 7,030.4 3.0 83,057 4.6 2,965.6 3.4 440.2 2.4 2,525.6 3.6 573.3 3.6 474.0 4.7 293.5 3.2 467.9 2.6 2011 284,801 7.8 50,952 4.2 105,733 6.0 7,242.5 3.0 84,924 2.2 3,060.9 3.2 453.0 2.9 2,608.1 3.3 591.4 3.1 494.5 4.3 301.3 2.7 479.0 2.4 123,788 8.6 45,687 4.2 51,622 13.8 3,897.0 4.1 63,449 -2.8 1,765.6 5.0 289.6 6.6 1,476.0 4.7 358.6 5.0 287.2 6.7 169.8 4.4 229.4 3.5 135,053 9.1 47,593 4.2 55,597 7.7 4,033.9 3.5 55,344 -12.8 1,853.1 5.0 297.1 2.6 1,556.1 5.4 374.0 4.3 314.6 9.6 177.1 4.3 235.9 2.8 145,516 7.7 49,756 4.5 58,828 5.8 4,159.4 3.1 49,758 -10.1 1,906.9 2.9 292.0 -1.7 1,614.9 3.8 386.2 3.3 330.4 5.0 181.8 2.6 241.9 2.5 156,231 7.4 51,998 4.5 61,927 5.3 4,284.9 3.0 49,792 0.1 1,955.5 2.6 293.0 0.3 1,662.6 3.0 396.8 2.7 337.6 2.2 186.7 2.7 246.2 1.8 169,271 8.3 54,400 4.6 66,055 6.7 4,421.0 3.2 53,961 8.4 2,022.7 3.4 300.7 2.7 1,722.0 3.6 409.8 3.3 348.9 3.4 193.6 3.7 252.3 2.5 183,787 8.6 56,907 4.6 70,135 6.2 4,564.2 3.2 56,812 5.3 2,098.8 3.8 311.3 3.5 1,787.6 3.8 424.8 3.6 364.3 4.4 200.4 3.5 259.1 2.7 198,058 7.8 59,438 4.4 73,850 5.3 4,707.6 3.1 56,883 0.1 2,167.0 3.2 320.2 2.9 1,846.8 3.3 438.6 3.3 380.3 4.4 205.7 2.6 265.3 2.4 26,537 7.7 38,076 4.4 11,077 11.9 956.9 2.8 11,758 13.0 376.3 4.5 56.9 5.1 319.4 4.4 61.4 5.9 44.4 4.4 41.6 6.5 80.9 1.8 28,813 8.6 39,622 4.1 11,860 7.1 983.5 2.8 11,290 -4.0 391.8 4.1 59.8 5.1 332.0 3.9 63.8 3.9 48.2 8.6 43.6 4.8 82.3 1.8 30,961 7.5 41,167 3.9 12,381 4.4 1008.2 2.5 9,749 -13.6 403.2 2.9 61.2 2.3 342.0 3.0 65.5 2.6 51.9 7.5 44.8 2.9 83.4 1.3 32,955 6.4 42,690 3.7 12,944 4.5 1031.5 2.3 9,189 -5.8 410.9 1.9 61.2 0.1 349.7 2.2 66.7 1.9 53.8 3.8 45.8 2.1 84.5 1.2 35,163 6.7 44,237 3.6 13,528 4.5 1055.9 2.4 9,618 4.7 419.4 2.1 61.7 0.8 357.7 2.3 68.2 2.2 55.4 2.9 46.9 2.5 85.7 1.4 37,534 6.7 45,816 3.6 14,155 4.6 1081.3 2.4 9,999 4.0 428.5 2.2 62.8 1.7 365.7 2.2 69.6 2.1 56.9 2.7 48.1 2.4 87.0 1.5 39,898 6.3 47,444 3.6 14,771 4.4 1106.2 2.3 9,833 -1.7 436.8 1.9 63.8 1.7 372.9 2.0 70.8 1.7 58.7 3.2 49.0 1.9 87.9 1.0 * Aggregate Retail Sales includes retail, food, restaurant & bars and gasoline sales. Source: Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 5. UA is a Major Contributor to 1 Arizona’s Economy By Vera Pavlakovich-Kochi, Ph.D. and Alberta H. Charney, Ph.D.2 The University of Arizona is a land-grant school and a Doctoral/Research University-Extensive (formerly called a Research I Institution). As such it plays a valuable role in training citizens and conducting advanced research in important academic areas such as astronomy, medicine, optics, and biosciences. The University of Arizona is also a major generator of economic activity in Pima County and throughout Arizona. The annual statewide economic impact of the University includes the creation of approximately 41,300 jobs, $1.2 billion in earnings and a total dollar impact on the state’s economy of $2.3 billion in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004. The impacts estimated in this report are limited to the following sources of university-related spending: University purchases and operating expenditures, University capital investment (including construction), University employee spending, student spending, and University-related visitor spending. As such, this study does not evaluate the economic contributions of the spending of alumni or retired University employees who stay in the area. Similarly, the study does not estimate the economic impact of private businesses that are in Pima County either directly or indirectly because of the existence of the University. • Statewide, the UA accounts for over 42,000 jobs, $1.2 billion in earnings (primarily wage and salary disbursements), and $2.3 billion in total dollar impact (as measured by spending). • One in every ten employees in metro Tucson holds a job directly or indirectly related to the UA. • Every dollar of state appropriated funds is matched by $1.45 in grants, contracts, and gifts. • State appropriations account for 28.5% of total spending. Student tuition and fees represents 15.5%. Grants, contract and gifts comprise 41%. • Every dollar of state appropriations generates $7.13 in total spending. • Over $98 million in tax revenues is generated, including $54.2 million that is collected by the State of Arizona. University Revenues Total University revenues in 2004 were $1.1 billion. In addition to the state appropriation funding, the University attracts additional dollars to the local economy from several other sources. For every dollar of the state’s $317.3 million in appropriated funds, the University received $3.5 from other revenue sources. Federal grants and contracts were the largest source of University revenues, accounting for more than $346.3 million. The share of University revenues attributable to federal grants and contracts increased substantially from 25.8 percent in fiscal year 1998 to 31.2 percent in 2004. In 2004, the University attracted an additional $1.45 in grants, contracts and gifts for every $1 of state-appropriated funds. University Impact on the Pima County Economy The University buys from local businesses various goods and services such as equipment, office supplies, and professional services. The economic impact of these purchases is almost 2,000 jobs and $168.8 million in earnings in Pima County. Locally, the University spent more than $60 million in construction and acquisition of capital goods, creating 1,300 jobs in construction and other industries in Pima County. This activity contributed $44.6 million in earnings to the local economy. The University employed 14,484 full- and parttime persons, including more than 3,000 graduate students. The total payroll, including benefits, was $714.9 million. The local spending of University faculty and staff generated an economic impact in Pima County of 7,500 jobs and $171.7 million in additional earnings. Not counting tuition, University student spending injected $704.3 million into the local economy. This generated 12,600 jobs and $279 million in earnings in Pima County. More than 809,000 University-associated visi- For every $1.00 of the state’s $317.3 million in appropriated funds, the University received $3.50 from other revenue sources. 6. tor-days were generated in Pima County, creating about 1,640 jobs and $35.3 million in earnings. The total employment impact of the University was 39,500 jobs in Pima County. This included direct employment of 14,484 at the University and all other jobs generated by University-related activities. This represents 9.8 percent of total employment in Pima County. Thus, every 10th employed person in Pima County is directly or indirectly related to The University of Arizona. The combined earnings impact was $1.1 billion in Pima County. The total dollar impact (including earnings and tax revenues) was $2.1 billion. This means that $7.13 in total sales is generated by University-related activities for every dollar of state appropriated funds. Impact on the Arizona Economy The economic impact of The University of Arizona extends beyond the boundaries of Pima UA Revenues by Source FY 2004 (in thousands of dollars) State appropriations Federal grants and contracts Non-federal grants and contracts Student tuition and fees Gifts Auxiliary enterprise operations Other* Total 317,250 346,282 73,125 172,529 41,717 121,087 48,617 1,111,607 Total Revenue Impact Source: UA Annual Financial Report, Year ended June 30, 2004 * Includes state education sales tax revenues, investment income (less interest expense on debt), and other revenues. Economic Impacts of the University of Arizona Pima County Jobs 39,498 $1.1 billion Earnings Tax Revenues City of Tucson $20.3 million Tax Revenues Pima County $14 million Tax Revenues Counties Tax Revenues State Pima Association of Governments $0.1 million Total Impact $2.1 billion Beyond Pima County Total Impact on Arizona 1,774 $60.9 million County. The University has a physical presence in every county of Arizona through its various programs and outreach center. The University also purchases goods and services from other Arizona businesses outside of Pima County. More than 1,770 jobs and $60.9 million in earnings were generated in Arizona counties other than Pima County. The total dollar impact was $140.7 million. Combining the impacts in Pima County with those in all other Arizona counties, The University of Arizona generated close to 41,300 jobs with $1.2 billion in earnings. The total dollar impact on the state economy was an estimated $2.3 billion, including earnings and revenue impacts. 41,272 $1.2 billion The University generates tax revenues directly through purchases of goods and services and indirectly through taxes paid by University employees. In addition, employees of businesses that sell to the University, students and visitors pay taxes to all levels of governments. The total tax impact in fiscal year 2004 was $98.1 million, including $54.2 to state government, $20.3 million to the City of Tucson, $14 million to Pima County, $9.5 million to other Arizona counties and cities, and about $100,000 to the Pima Association of governments. Tax revenues associated with the spending impacts estimated in this report are estimated to return $17.10 to the state government for every $100 of state appropriated funding received in fiscal year 2004. ■ 1 The entire study is available online at either http://oed.arizona.edu or http://ebr.eller.arizona.edu. $9.5 million $54.2 million $98.1 million $140.7 million $2.3 billion 2 The authors of this article are with the Office of Economic and Policy Analysis in the Office of Economic Development and the Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, respectively. The authors would like to recognize Lora Mwaniki-Lyman and Dr. Sushila Umashankar as co-authors of the original study. The University of Arizona generated close to 41,300 jobs with $1.2 billion in earnings. The total dollar impact on the state economy was an estimated $2.3 billion. 7. Study Shows Phoenix is a Great Place for Women Business Owners By Heather Peterson December 2, 2005 Phoenix is a great place for women to own businesses according to a study by the Center for Women’s Business Research. Using U.S. Census Bureau data, Center researchers ranked 50 MSAs based on estimates of how many privately-held firms were at least half-owned by women. The rankings also reflect firms’ employee counts and sales volumes. Phoenix-Mesa ranked fifth overall, with 54.7 percent (136,845) of privately-held firms (250,300) being at least half owned by women. These women-owned firms boast a sales volume of more than $41 billion and account for 21.2 percent (304,408) of all private sector jobs. When the cities were ranked solely based on the share of women-owned firms, Phoenix-Mesa’s 54.7 percent moved the city into third place, behind Portland-Vancouver with 57.7 percent and SeattleBellevue-Everett with 56.8 percent. Las-Vegas ranked fourth with 53.7 percent. Center researchers estimated that between 1997 and 2004 the number of women-owned firms in the Phoenix-Mesa MSA grew 30.6 percent, the number of employer firms grew by 43.8 percent, and employment in these firms grew by 49.1 percent. At the same time, sales increased by 79.3 percent. These growth numbers combined to place Phoenix-Mesa second for overall growth in women-owned businesses, following Salt Lake City-Ogden in first place, ahead of third-place Las Vegas. At the state level, Arizona was ranked fourteenth with 56.6 percent of private-sector firms at least half-owned by women. These firms account for 24.5 percent of the State’s private sector jobs and generate more than $60 billion in sales. Arizona ranked second for strong growth in the number of women-owned firms, which increased a stunning 30 percent, while sales volume shot up a whopping 79 percent between 1997 and 2004. Utah placed first and Nevada followed in third. The number of firms in Phoenix-Mesa increased 31 percent between 1997 and 2004, the number of employer firms grew by 44 percent, and employment in these firms grew by 49 percent. These growth numbers placed Phoenix-Mesa second, following Salt Lake City-Ogden in first place, and Las Vegas ranked third. To read this study or for more general information, visit the Center for Women’s Business Research at www.cfwbr.org. ■ Number of Firms, Sales Volume, and Employment Firms Owned 50% or More by Women 2004 Arizona and Phoenix-Mesa MSA California Texas Washington Arizona Colorado Oregon Nevada Utah New Mexico Idaho Phoenix-Mesa MSA 8. Total Number of Privately-Held Firms 2,571,405 1,659,061 475,188 388,333 470,562 317,345 166,321 204,149 145,222 126,102 250,300 Number of 50% or Employment in Firms More Women 50% or more Owned Firms % of Total Total Employment Owned by Women 1,249,343 48.6% 2,818,949 791,387 47.7% 1,515,034 280,075 58.9% 538,087 219,894 56.6% 1,979,000 484,214 245,185 52.1% 358,227 186,704 58.8% 355,826 89,501 53.8% 177,803 50.1% 217,260 102,194 84,048 57.9% 176,931 74,713 59.2% 140,743 136,845 54.7% 1,435,950 304,408 Phoenix-Mesa ranked fifth overall, with 54.7 percent of privately held firms being at least half owned by women. % of Total Private Sector Employment 24.5% 21.2% Sales ($000) 406,217,440 197,112,725 70,398,286 60,296,582 49,824,725 42,515,391 29,216,458 22,795,105 18,999,798 16,959,144 41,176,987 A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S APACHE COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units NAVAJO COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 20,375 18,125 2,250 11.0 20,150 18,025 2,125 10.5 19,550 17,400 2,150 11.0 19,350 17,225 2,125 11.0 19,250 16,900 2,350 12.2 -3.6 -4.7 4.4 8.4 -1.3 -0.9 -4.2 -2.8 20,375 6,875 900 19,475 1,825 4,150 13,500 3,300 10,200 20,350 6,775 900 19,450 1,900 3,975 13,575 3,275 10,300 19,575 6,625 875 18,700 1,925 3,825 12,950 3,175 9,775 19,325 6,525 775 18,550 1,950 3,800 12,800 3,150 9,650 18,825 6,325 725 18,100 1,875 3,725 12,500 3,050 9,450 -2.7 -1.6 11.5 -3.2 1.4 -5.1 -3.3 -1.6 -3.8 1.1 3.6 14.6 0.6 0.6 3.1 -0.2 1.8 -0.8 15,229 6,576 1,055 7,598 2,610 10,857 1,373 14,392 6,461 1,015 6,916 2,515 6,450 1,134 13,379 6,399 677 6,304 2,628 9,477 534 13,326 7,007 849 5,469 2,533 7,863 904 ... ... ... 5,585 2,439 ... ... 11.5 12.1 1.6 20.5 -5.1 12.5 2.9 15.8 17.7 9.1 15.1 -3.6 27.0 17.7 Note: As of Jan 2005, Apache County no longer reports monthly permits. 37,425 34,400 3,025 8.1 36,875 34,025 2,850 7.7 36,450 33,475 2,975 8.2 36,625 33,675 2,950 8.1 36,300 32,950 3,350 9.2 -1.3 -1.8 3.9 5.2 -0.9 -0.8 -2.1 -1.2 29,650 19,425 3,550 2,725 825 26,100 5,575 750 550 1,150 3,650 3,150 1,050 10,225 1,775 8,450 29,475 19,250 3,575 2,775 800 25,900 5,525 750 550 1,150 3,650 3,025 1,025 10,225 1,675 8,550 29,050 18,975 3,450 2,675 775 25,600 5,725 750 525 1,150 3,650 2,725 1,000 10,075 1,500 8,575 29,375 18,900 3,350 2,675 675 26,025 5,675 800 550 1,200 3,600 2,700 1,025 10,475 1,650 8,825 28,400 18,250 3,150 2,475 675 25,250 5,475 800 550 1,200 3,550 2,575 950 10,150 1,500 8,650 0.7 3.3 -7.4 -2.9 -20.6 1.8 2.8 10.3 -12.0 20.0 8.4 3.0 15.2 -3.6 0.0 -4.2 1.2 4.5 3.9 6.8 -4.3 0.9 2.5 14.3 -8.5 9.0 10.4 -2.0 17.2 -4.3 -1.6 -4.7 88,252 65,198 7,361 15,693 5,390 20,491 3,001 79,769 58,096 7,104 14,569 5,299 19,133 2,497 73,680 55,892 6,169 11,619 4,843 18,759 1,666 87,371 69,752 6,649 10,969 5,081 23,872 2,150 ... ... ... 10,973 4,793 ... ... 10.3 11.3 9.8 16.9 -7.9 91.8 14.1 10.2 9.2 12.1 14.0 -4.4 35.3 10.0 59 57 63 59 76 76 29 27 50 46 127.3 109.1 26.4 32.7 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 9. A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S GRAHAM COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting COCONINO COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 12,275 11,425 850 6.9 12,250 11,450 800 6.5 12,275 11,500 775 6.3 12,200 11,450 750 6.1 12,275 11,400 875 7.1 2.7 2.2 9.4 6.5 2.3 2.6 -2.0 -4.2 7,425 4,875 600 6,825 1,525 2,750 2,550 325 2,225 7,525 4,850 600 6,925 1,525 2,725 2,675 325 2,350 7,575 5,000 625 6,950 1,625 2,750 2,575 325 2,250 7,550 4,975 600 6,950 1,600 2,775 2,575 325 2,250 7,325 4,750 550 6,775 1,525 2,675 2,575 325 2,250 3.5 2.7 0.0 3.8 5.2 1.9 5.1 8.3 4.7 3.2 6.2 6.0 3.0 4.3 7.4 -2.0 2.6 -2.7 18,669 14,600 1,643 2,426 833 2,459 18,646 14,687 1,757 2,202 801 2,850 19,406 15,047 2,325 2,034 848 4,788 22,651 19,005 1,725 1,922 890 4,137 ... ... ... 1,895 827 ... 14.6 17.4 2.5 7.9 -15.0 84.3 18.2 18.6 18.7 13.3 -4.5 19.7 68,600 65,100 3,500 5.1 68,300 65,000 3,300 4.8 67,900 64,600 3,300 4.9 67,000 63,600 3,400 5.1 66,400 62,300 4,100 6.2 2.3 2.1 5.1 2.8 1.6 1.8 -1.6 -3.1 63,900 44,200 6,700 3,300 3,400 57,200 9,400 500 1,700 4,000 7,200 12,800 1,900 19,700 3,200 16,500 64,100 44,200 6,700 3,300 3,400 57,400 9,300 500 1,700 4,000 7,400 12,800 1,800 19,900 3,000 16,900 64,200 44,200 6,700 3,200 3,500 57,500 9,500 500 1,700 3,900 7,300 12,800 1,800 20,000 2,900 17,100 63,100 43,700 6,600 3,200 3,400 56,500 9,400 500 1,700 3,900 7,400 12,400 1,800 19,400 2,800 16,600 61,200 42,300 6,500 3,000 3,500 54,700 9,100 500 1,600 3,800 7,300 11,800 1,700 18,900 2,600 16,300 5.2 6.0 8.3 3.4 12.9 4.8 0.0 25.0 0.0 18.8 5.8 8.3 -5.6 3.3 -10.3 5.8 3.9 4.8 4.1 0.3 8.0 3.9 0.2 7.3 -0.5 12.0 5.5 7.7 1.8 2.0 -6.8 3.8 140,565 88,783 26,827 24,956 8,572 35,233 21,394 136,971 87,723 26,831 22,417 8,154 26,012 19,164 116,602 78,283 21,034 17,284 7,205 31,134 11,030 135,817 98,156 20,917 16,744 7,755 35,868 10,529 ... ... ... 16,118 7,040 ... ... 7.3 7.2 2.3 18.5 -6.7 40.3 5.4 8.1 5.9 9.4 16.3 -2.5 13.0 7.5 174 90 88 88 80 80 62 62 67 67 76.3 103.0 27.9 -1.1 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. 10. % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S GREENLEE COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel* % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 3,500 3,300 200 5.7 3,500 3,300 200 5.7 3,525 3,325 200 5.7 3,475 3,300 175 5.0 3,500 3,300 200 5.7 2.9 3.1 0.0 -2.9 2.6 2.7 1.1 -1.5 3,825 3,350 2,725 1,100 300 325 475 50 425 3,800 3,325 2,700 1,100 300 325 475 50 425 3,850 3,350 2,725 1,125 275 350 500 50 450 3,850 3,350 2,725 1,125 275 350 500 50 450 3,925 3,450 2,775 1,150 275 400 475 50 425 9.8 12.2 11.0 7.0 0.0 33.3 -5.0 100.0 -10.5 8.2 10.8 11.5 0.9 14.3 3.2 -6.7 -9.1 -6.5 10,566 9,582 203 781 268 5,038 668 9,052 8,003 287 762 277 2,328 490 7,798 6,907 260 631 263 1,761 479 8,552 7,821 212 518 240 3,172 477 ... ... ... 643 281 ... ... -0.7 -0.6 -14.2 42.8 12.5 N/A 86.2 11.9 10.2 10.7 42.4 19.0 59.7 33.7 92,100 88,200 3,900 4.2 91,900 88,200 3,700 4.0 90,900 87,400 3,500 3.9 90,500 87,200 3,300 3.6 90,000 85,900 4,100 4.6 4.0 3.7 10.8 6.5 3.9 4.1 0.7 -3.2 61,400 50,000 12,200 8,600 3,600 49,200 11,600 600 2,200 5,100 8,500 7,700 2,100 11,400 1,300 10,100 61,800 50,200 12,200 8,500 3,700 49,600 11,900 600 2,200 5,100 8,500 7,600 2,100 11,600 1,300 10,300 61,800 50,200 12,000 8,300 3,700 49,800 12,200 600 2,200 5,000 8,600 7,500 2,100 11,600 1,300 10,300 61,500 50,300 12,000 8,300 3,700 49,500 12,100 600 2,300 5,100 8,600 7,500 2,100 11,200 1,200 10,000 59,900 48,900 11,700 8,100 3,600 48,200 11,800 600 2,100 4,900 8,500 7,300 2,000 11,000 1,200 9,800 7.2 7.7 9.3 12.5 2.9 6.6 5.4 0.0 10.5 19.5 3.7 4.3 17.6 4.8 0.0 5.4 6.7 7.4 10.5 12.6 6.1 5.8 5.9 -12.2 12.1 15.9 5.1 2.8 8.5 3.8 0.7 4.2 171,561 130,071 20,529 20,960 7,199 62,935 7,858 176,329 134,135 21,959 20,235 7,360 65,982 9,221 163,514 127,293 20,263 15,957 6,652 73,315 6,605 198,778 163,621 20,163 14,995 6,945 81,206 6,074 ... ... ... 15,304 6,684 ... ... 12.6 14.2 1.0 26.3 -0.6 41.9 15.9 16.2 16.0 17.0 17.5 -1.5 25.5 18.0 315 311 316 302 311 308 251 249 248 248 -1.2 0.4 11.7 19.0 * Includes Graham County data. YAVAPAI COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 11. A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S GILA COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel MOHAVE COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 20,650 19,300 1,350 6.5 20,450 19,150 1,300 6.4 20,350 19,100 1,250 6.1 20,250 19,050 1,200 5.9 20,200 18,800 1,400 6.9 0.4 -0.3 9.8 9.4 0.1 0.3 -2.8 -2.8 14,050 9,175 1,925 12,125 2,150 5,100 4,875 550 4,325 14,025 9,175 1,900 12,125 2,150 5,125 4,850 525 4,325 14,275 9,500 2,125 12,150 2,250 5,125 4,775 425 4,350 14,225 9,425 2,125 12,100 2,225 5,075 4,800 450 4,350 13,900 9,200 2,075 11,825 2,125 5,000 4,700 425 4,275 2.4 4.5 0.0 2.8 2.4 7.5 -1.6 -5.6 -1.2 1.7 3.0 -0.3 2.0 1.7 5.0 -0.8 -2.8 -0.6 35,140 23,801 4,665 6,674 2,292 10,504 1,221 34,471 23,197 4,797 6,477 2,356 8,095 1,206 33,867 23,364 4,200 6,303 2,627 9,504 966 39,402 29,253 4,188 5,962 2,761 9,681 891 ... ... ... 5,666 2,475 ... ... 14.5 15.9 -2.1 40.9 11.0 -1.8 31.0 15.0 15.1 8.1 22.0 3.0 -3.5 19.6 87,850 84,075 3,775 4.3 88,350 84,725 3,625 4.1 88,525 85,025 3,500 4.0 87,700 84,300 3,400 3.9 89,050 84,875 4,175 4.7 4.8 4.1 22.8 17.1 4.8 4.8 5.4 0.5 53,125 45,275 11,025 7,100 3,925 42,100 11,400 950 2,175 3,875 6,775 6,525 2,550 7,850 525 7,325 53,600 45,725 11,075 7,150 3,925 42,525 11,525 950 2,175 3,825 6,925 6,675 2,575 7,875 525 7,350 54,125 46,175 11,050 7,150 3,900 43,075 12,025 950 2,200 3,950 6,900 6,500 2,600 7,950 525 7,425 53,725 45,850 10,700 7,000 3,700 43,025 12,050 975 2,200 3,975 6,900 6,475 2,575 7,875 525 7,350 53,625 45,700 10,975 7,300 3,675 42,650 11,900 925 2,125 3,900 7,050 6,325 2,500 7,925 500 7,425 7.1 7.8 5.3 10.6 -3.9 7.6 9.9 0.0 7.6 11.4 8.5 5.4 12.4 2.9 0.0 3.1 7.0 7.5 9.1 10.7 6.1 6.4 6.2 2.9 8.7 8.5 6.1 7.1 10.3 4.2 2.0 4.3 179,625 136,105 16,183 27,337 9,389 61,228 4,316 153,740 110,496 16,985 26,260 9,551 56,056 3,673 162,580 124,444 15,575 22,561 9,404 52,945 2,585 181,896 143,744 15,895 22,257 10,308 52,682 2,896 ... ... ... 22,741 9,932 ... ... 7.9 7.6 -1.7 44.2 13.5 -0.8 22.9 17.4 16.7 13.2 25.7 5.7 20.5 7.2 387 380 328 316 304 300 234 232 265 237 -14.0 -16.8 5.4 7.5 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. 12. % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S LA PAZ COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel YUMA METROPOLITAN REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 7,225 6,675 550 7.6 7,225 6,700 525 7.3 7,250 6,750 500 6.9 7,200 6,725 475 6.6 7,350 6,800 550 7.5 -3.9 -4.6 4.8 9.0 -0.2 -0.6 4.6 4.9 5,200 3,000 450 4,750 1,325 1,225 2,200 225 1,975 5,250 3,075 450 4,800 1,375 1,250 2,175 225 1,950 5,200 3,050 450 4,750 1,325 1,275 2,150 225 1,925 5,225 3,075 475 4,750 1,325 1,275 2,150 225 1,925 5,275 3,150 500 4,775 1,275 1,375 2,125 225 1,900 -2.8 2.4 11.1 -4.0 -5.6 7.8 -9.6 0.0 -10.6 0.9 3.8 13.5 -0.2 2.1 2.4 -2.9 5.9 -3.8 16,167 8,581 1,854 5,732 1,969 3,399 462 20,314 12,335 1,951 6,028 2,192 2,541 403 17,598 9,202 2,120 6,275 2,616 2,237 439 18,543 11,136 2,091 5,315 2,462 3,830 409 ... ... ... 6,994 3,055 ... ... -2.6 -2.8 -11.5 27.9 0.7 145.2 0.6 18.4 21.7 11.3 15.7 -1.7 4.1 6.0 74,000 60,200 13,800 18.6 73,700 61,800 11,900 16.1 75,500 64,400 11,100 14.7 75,800 66,400 9,400 12.4 75,700 66,900 8,800 11.6 4.7 3.7 12.8 7.8 4.1 3.6 7.2 2.7 49,600 35,700 7,300 4,900 2,400 42,300 9,300 1,100 1,500 3,500 6,100 5,400 1,500 13,900 3,100 10,800 51,100 36,700 7,500 5,000 2,500 43,600 9,800 1,100 1,500 3,500 6,100 5,700 1,500 14,400 3,100 11,300 53,000 38,400 7,900 5,000 2,900 45,100 10,300 1,100 1,500 3,600 6,400 6,000 1,600 14,600 3,200 11,400 55,000 40,800 8,700 5,000 3,700 46,300 11,500 1,100 1,500 3,800 6,400 6,200 1,600 14,200 3,300 10,900 54,700 40,600 8,700 4,900 3,800 46,000 11,400 1,100 1,500 3,700 6,400 6,300 1,500 14,100 3,200 10,900 4.8 4.6 6.1 11.4 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.9 16.7 -6.3 5.2 10.3 3.8 5.6 6.4 7.6 12.0 1.1 5.2 4.5 0.0 3.5 7.0 4.2 15.6 -2.1 3.5 5.2 3.0 126,647 93,530 12,432 20,685 7,105 39,617 2,417 137,513 103,253 13,992 20,268 7,372 31,683 3,539 146,178 111,599 15,419 19,161 7,987 33,170 3,409 185,478 149,264 17,099 19,115 8,853 40,719 3,873 ... ... ... 20,864 9,113 ... ... 9.6 11.0 6.5 26.2 -0.6 25.6 34.1 16.4 15.2 15.4 24.8 5.1 24.2 14.7 213 208 168 168 130 125 168 168 142 142 -4.1 -2.7 -14.2 -9.8 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 13. A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S SANTA CRUZ COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Other Private Service-Providing Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units COCHISE COUNTY Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Total Private Goods-Producing Mining and Construction Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Leisure and Hospitality Other Services Government Federal Government State and Local Government Sales ($000) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 16,000 14,075 1,925 12.0 16,300 14,525 1,775 10.9 16,350 14,900 1,450 8.9 16,450 15,225 1,225 7.4 16,275 15,025 1,250 7.7 3.3 3.3 4.2 0.8 3.4 4.1 -3.2 -6.5 12,725 9,500 925 11,800 4,925 3,650 3,225 1,200 2,025 13,275 10,025 900 12,375 5,325 3,800 3,250 1,225 2,025 13,725 10,450 875 12,850 5,725 3,850 3,275 1,250 2,025 14,050 10,775 825 13,225 6,100 3,850 3,275 1,250 2,025 13,725 10,400 775 12,950 5,875 3,750 3,325 1,250 2,075 6.6 9.5 -16.2 8.4 11.4 13.6 -1.5 11.1 -7.8 6.9 9.7 -4.1 7.8 11.8 10.5 -0.7 4.1 -3.3 35,101 26,078 3,453 5,570 1,913 10,334 888 36,227 28,586 3,184 4,456 1,621 7,348 706 43,831 34,105 3,700 6,026 2,512 9,722 1,225 58,602 47,891 4,543 6,167 2,857 8,950 1,327 ... ... ... 5,473 2,390 ... ... 11.9 14.4 16.5 17.0 -7.9 N/A 65.8 14.7 16.6 11.3 7.6 -8.6 41.2 19.3 64 59 48 48 36 36 30 30 128 128 265.7 265.7 15.3 16.9 56,375 53,400 2,975 5.3 56,325 53,500 2,825 5.0 56,075 53,400 2,675 4.8 55,900 53,300 2,600 4.7 56,500 53,350 3,150 5.6 3.7 2.8 20.0 15.8 3.2 3.1 4.3 1.1 37,750 25,325 3,700 2,850 850 34,050 6,450 450 1,000 4,450 3,900 4,225 1,150 12,425 5,025 7,400 38,050 25,600 3,775 2,900 875 34,275 6,500 450 1,000 4,500 3,950 4,250 1,175 12,450 5,025 7,425 38,125 25,600 3,725 2,975 750 34,400 6,725 450 1,000 4,425 3,975 4,275 1,025 12,525 5,025 7,500 38,025 25,600 3,650 2,850 800 34,375 6,825 475 1,000 4,350 4,000 4,300 1,000 12,425 5,000 7,425 37,725 25,350 3,550 2,775 775 34,175 6,550 475 975 4,525 4,025 4,275 975 12,375 5,000 7,375 5.7 6.0 6.0 11.0 -8.8 5.7 2.3 0.0 8.3 9.0 4.5 11.8 0.0 5.3 4.2 6.1 5.6 5.4 7.7 11.1 -2.2 5.3 1.1 -8.3 4.7 15.2 4.4 6.2 -4.1 6.0 3.6 7.6 79,841 57,853 8,626 13,362 4,589 21,330 2,601 80,784 59,437 9,313 12,034 4,377 24,377 2,988 80,611 60,043 9,091 11,478 4,784 26,526 2,690 99,292 78,775 9,600 10,918 5,057 22,817 2,158 ... ... ... 11,340 4,953 ... ... 1.0 2.1 2.8 6.4 -16.2 -3.6 -6.8 7.8 7.5 1.8 12.3 -5.5 14.4 9.8 110 108 92 90 67 67 50 48 60 60 -14.3 -14.3 12.5 13.6 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. 14. % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S TUCSON METROPOLITAN REGION (PIMA) Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Natural Resources and Mining Construction Manufacturing Computer and Electronic Prod. Aerospace Products and Parts Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transp., Warehousing, and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Educational and Health Services Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation Food Svcs and Drinking Places Other Services Federal Government State and Local Government State and Local Government Education Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 adjusted by EBR Total Units Single Family Units 2-5-plus Unit Structures Housing Sales and Prices, TAR Total Sales ($000s) Total Units Average Price ($) Tucson International Airport, TAA Total Passengers Total Aircraft Movements OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 437.1 415.4 21.7 4.8 438.9 418.2 20.7 4.8 438.9 419.4 19.5 4.7 441.2 422.7 18.5 4.5 438.9 416.5 22.4 4.9 1.3 0.6 14.9 13.5 -0.2 -0.3 1.6 1.7 367.7 1.3 26.3 28.3 4.7 11.2 8.3 40.3 9.1 7.1 16.8 46.6 50.8 5.0 7.8 27.1 14.7 10.3 67.9 43.1 372.1 1.3 26.7 28.3 4.8 11.2 8.4 40.9 9.3 7.2 17.0 47.2 51.3 5.3 7.7 27.4 14.9 10.3 68.9 44.4 375.6 1.6 26.7 28.4 4.7 11.3 8.4 42.6 9.3 7.1 17.1 47.2 51.7 5.6 7.9 27.8 14.9 10.3 69.0 44.6 378.6 1.6 27.1 28.6 4.7 11.4 8.6 43.6 9.4 7.3 17.4 47.8 51.6 5.6 8.0 28.1 14.9 10.2 68.8 44.4 369.9 1.6 26.4 28.8 4.7 11.3 8.4 41.5 9.3 7.2 17.2 46.7 51.6 5.7 8.1 27.9 14.3 10.1 65.1 40.8 3.8 14.3 11.4 2.9 -6.0 1.8 5.0 0.7 5.7 -1.4 11.0 5.7 5.1 26.7 5.2 5.7 0.0 2.0 -1.8 -2.9 1.8 8.8 7.9 -0.3 -5.0 -0.4 3.2 -1.0 8.1 -4.9 4.2 5.5 5.3 2.4 0.1 4.5 -0.1 3.9 -3.9 -6.3 911,419 587,212 124,176 104,403 95,628 186,483 21,681 894,110 567,016 129,703 109,081 88,310 165,585 28,388 915,677 606,453 132,513 108,368 68,343 185,217 29,983 1,156,281 839,207 134,007 116,830 66,237 207,330 24,526 ... ... ... ... 70,074 ... ... 8.7 9.0 13.2 6.5 19.5 16.5 9.3 10.9 9.2 12.6 12.4 21.6 13.6 18.7 1,110 965 145 899 797 102 823 713 110 896 793 103 897 853 44 26.9 25.7 53.0 15.0 16.6 2.9 354,531 1,404 252,515 355,266 1,368 259,698 324,189 1,219 265,947 331,014 1,241 266,731 258,363 944 273,690 3.7 -13.1 19.3 32.3 7.2 23.5 313,413 23,941 357,371 24,194 354,541 27,291 358,549 25,337 ... ... 7.8 25.9 9.5 12.2 IV 2004 I 2005 II 2005 III 2005 IV 2005 940.7 1.3 3.3 2.0 4.7 947.1 1.3 3.3 2.0 5.1 953.8 1.3 3.3 2.0 5.3 960.4 1.3 3.3 2.0 5.3 967.0 1.3 3.3 2.0 5.3 2.8 -0.5 1.2 2.4 11.7 2.7 -0.3 1.2 2.1 18.3 25,339 17,597 1,990 120 4,929 4,683 26,936 25,715 17,955 2,022 123 4,890 4,769 27,151 26,247 18,362 2,072 126 4,962 4,868 27,519 26,803 18,761 2,124 129 5,068 4,968 27,908 27,384 19,143 2,180 132 5,220 5,068 28,320 8.1 8.8 9.6 9.6 5.9 8.2 5.1 7.7 9.0 9.1 9.9 3.3 8.3 4.9 TUCSON METROPOLITAN REGION (PIMA COUNTY) - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population Natural Increase Births Deaths Net Migration Personal Income by Source ($mil, SAAR) EBR Total Personal Income Earnings by Place of Work Less: Contributions for Social Insurance Plus: Adjustment for Residence Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents Plus: Transfer Payments Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months SEP 2005 % change versus year ago for most recent: quarter 4-quarters www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 15. A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S PHOENIX-MESA METROPOLITAN REGION (MARICOPA AND PINAL) Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Natural Resources and Mining Construction Durable Goods Fabricated Metal Products Computer and Electronic Prod. Aerospace Products and Parts Non-Durable Goods Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Utilities Transportation and Warehousing Information Finance and Insurance Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing Professional and Business Services Educational Services Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation Food Svcs and Drinking Places Other Services Federal Government State and Local Government State and Local Government Education Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Contracting Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Housing Sales and Prices, ARMLS Total Sales ($000s) Total Units Average Price ($) Phoenix Skyharbor International Airport, PSIA Total Passengers Total Aircraft Movements SEP 2005 OCT 2005 1,930.3 1,845.4 84.9 4.2 % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months NOV 2005 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 1,942.5 1,861.7 80.8 4.2 1,948.8 1,872.7 76.1 4.1 1,952.9 1,880.5 72.4 4.0 1,948.7 1,861.2 87.5 4.3 3.8 3.5 10.9 6.9 3.8 4.0 -1.5 -5.2 1,809.2 1.7 169.6 108.9 14.2 40.0 15.4 27.5 82.5 216.3 8.2 54.0 32.9 110.9 37.5 306.5 30.3 154.5 21.5 26.2 120.1 68.2 21.9 210.0 110.7 1,829.9 1.7 172.5 109.1 14.4 39.9 15.4 27.5 83.5 220.8 8.2 55.0 33.1 110.7 38.0 310.9 31.0 154.8 22.2 27.1 122.1 68.5 21.9 211.3 111.7 1,850.3 2.5 173.6 109.0 14.4 39.9 15.3 27.5 83.8 230.4 8.2 55.0 33.0 111.5 38.4 313.2 31.6 155.5 22.6 27.4 123.7 68.8 22.1 212.5 113.2 1,862.8 2.6 175.3 109.1 14.7 40.0 15.3 27.4 84.2 235.0 8.2 55.1 32.9 112.0 38.9 316.4 31.5 155.8 23.1 27.5 124.6 69.2 22.4 211.6 112.9 1,826.3 2.6 172.8 109.1 14.5 40.1 15.3 26.9 84.1 227.8 8.0 54.9 32.6 110.7 38.2 307.4 31.1 156.4 22.7 27.4 122.9 67.8 22.2 200.7 102.0 6.5 18.2 16.0 3.0 5.1 3.4 3.4 0.4 4.6 8.2 2.6 2.8 1.2 4.8 5.8 9.8 4.7 6.6 7.6 0.4 6.8 6.4 1.8 0.7 1.6 6.2 4.4 15.9 3.3 5.7 2.5 3.5 0.5 4.3 8.3 2.2 2.5 -3.1 5.1 7.6 9.4 6.9 5.2 5.1 -0.7 6.4 4.6 1.2 2.0 3.3 4,303,110 2,878,748 546,914 479,397 398,050 1,204,574 83,888 4,363,527 2,889,600 571,256 511,397 391,274 1,120,078 110,371 4,444,380 3,036,818 583,633 511,297 312,632 1,242,223 116,001 5,572,205 4,119,293 590,212 553,719 308,980 1,443,256 102,327 ... ... ... ... 322,354 ... ... 15.7 16.7 14.4 10.4 32.1 32.8 12.1 14.7 14.7 13.8 12.6 21.2 29.5 15.6 5,263 4,350 38 875 5,433 3,889 144 1,400 3,577 3,405 61 111 4,703 3,905 176 622 4,915 3,593 257 1,065 14.0 -3.6 213.4 110.9 -4.8 -9.7 -7.7 42.2 2,827,977 8,871 318,789 2,513,633 7,751 324,298 2,279,457 7,048 323,419 2,093,431 6,300 332,291 1,721,698 5,048 341,065 5.4 -19.9 31.6 40.1 3.6 35.8 3,130,240 45,879 3,451,033 47,572 3,404,530 46,840 3,433,127 47,656 3,310,363 46,349 4.9 0.6 4.1 1.5 SOURCES AND ABBREVIATIONS: ADES: Arizona Department of Economic Security ADHS: Arizona Department of Health Services ADOR: Arizona Department of Revenue ADOT: Arizona Department of Transportation ARMLS: Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service ASPB: Arizona State Parks Board BEA: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce 16. BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor Census C-40: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce EBR: Economic & Business Research Center, The University of Arizona NPS: National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior PSIA: Phoenix Skyharbor International Airport SAAR: Seasonally adjusted at annual rates TAA: Tucson Airport Authority TAR: Tucson Association of Realtors U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Arizona USBCBP: U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S IV 2004 I 2005 PHOENIX-MESA METROPOLITAN REGION (MARICOPA AND PINAL COUNTY) - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population 3,803.0 3,841.6 Natural Increase 9.3 9.3 Births 15.7 15.8 Deaths 6.4 6.5 Net Migration 31.1 29.4 Personal Income by Source ($mil, SAAR) EBR Total Personal Income 117,661 119,672 Earnings by Place of Work 94,582 96,475 Less: Contributions for Social Insurance 10,382 10,543 Plus: Adjustment for Residence -46 -46 Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents 18,147 18,069 Plus: Transfer Payments 15,360 15,717 Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR 30,939 31,152 ARIZONA - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population Natural Increase Births Deaths Net Migration Personal Income Derivation ($mil, SAAR) BEA & EBR Total Personal Income Earnings by Place of Work Less: Contributions for Social Insurance Plus: Adjustment for Residence Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents Plus: Transfer Payments Components of Earnings ($mil, SAAR) BEA & EBR Wages and Salaries Other Labor Income EBR Proprietor’s Income Farm Nonfarm Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR Average Wage Per Employee, Annual Rate ($) EBR % change versus year ago for most recent: quarter 4-quarters II 2005 III 2005 IV 2005 3,878.6 9.3 15.9 6.6 27.7 3,913.8 9.4 16.0 6.6 25.8 3,948.2 9.5 16.2 6.7 24.9 3.8 2.0 2.8 4.1 -19.9 4.0 1.3 2.4 4.1 -6.3 122,357 98,796 10,815 -46 18,324 16,098 31,547 125,132 101,129 11,109 -46 18,682 16,476 31,972 127,993 103,442 11,426 -46 19,176 16,847 32,418 8.8 9.4 10.1 0.7 5.7 9.7 4.8 8.6 9.4 9.4 1.9 3.6 10.0 4.3 5,907.4 13.3 23.8 10.5 36.7 5,956.5 12.8 23.5 10.6 35.5 6,004.5 12.6 24.2 11.5 35.0 6,053.1 13.4 23.9 10.5 36.1 6,102.8 12.8 23.7 10.9 37.2 3.3 -3.9 -0.4 4.0 1.3 3.4 1.7 2.2 2.8 -4.5 170,663 130,079 14,266 643 28,111 26,096 172,784 133,396 14,777 660 26,553 26,954 176,407 136,214 15,052 675 27,103 27,471 178,814 139,242 15,341 690 25,723 28,503 184,472 142,696 15,663 708 28,178 28,555 8.1 9.7 9.8 10.1 0.2 9.4 8.4 10.1 10.3 10.1 0.0 9.6 94,147 20,945 14,663 412 14,251 28,890 38,286 96,006 21,639 15,258 713 14,545 29,008 38,643 97,778 22,143 15,938 739 15,199 29,379 38,849 99,975 22,796 16,604 823 15,780 29,541 39,119 102,243 23,382 ... ... ... 30,228 ... 8.6 11.6 12.6 44.1 11.3 4.6 4.0 9.4 12.1 10.4 3.8 10.7 4.9 4.8 SEP 2005 OCT 2005 NOV 2005 DEC 2005 1,579,277 133,819 559,871 885,587 103,175 20,093 60,559 22,523 1,394,300 119,325 486,432 788,543 193,454 30,898 131,822 30,734 941,659 84,233 335,718 521,708 202,603 31,649 148,917 22,037 781,257 64,645 291,377 425,235 208,809 35,400 159,194 14,215 929,069 72,044 262,685 594,340 279,300 43,049 209,130 27,121 22.0 28.3 51.4 11.8 14.9 -8.6 18.6 37.9 1.0 -5.7 5.2 -0.5 2.9 7.6 1.4 5.0 630,599 1,716,005 ... 666,986 1,646,390 ... 656,552 1,732,627 ... 705,441 1,920,452 ... 631,041 1,842,596 ... -1.6 4.6 ... -3.5 -8.6 ... 198.8 195.0 199.2 195.2 196.8 192.5 196.8 192.5 198.3 194.0 4.0 4.1 3.4 3.6 TRAVEL AND TOURISM - MONTHLY DATA Visits to Parks & Other Recreational Areas, NPS & ASPB Northern Arizona Historical Scenic Water Based Recreation Southern Arizona Historical Scenic Water Based Recreation International Border Crossings, USBCBP U.S. Citizens Aliens Vehicles MEASURES OF INFLATION AND PRICES - MONTHLY DATA Consumer Price Index (1982-1984=100) BLS U.S. - All Urban U.S. - Wage Earners JAN 2006 % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 17. A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S ARIZONA MONTHLY DATA Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Natural Resources and Mining Construction Durable Goods Manufacturing Fabricated Metal Products Computer and Electronic Prod. Aerospace Products and Parts Non-Durable Goods Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Utilities Transportation and Warehousing Information Finance and Insurance Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing Professional and Business Services Educational Services Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation Food Svcs and Drinking Places Other Services Federal Government State and Local Government State and Local Government Education Hours Worked Per Week, Manufacturing, ADES Average Hourly Earnings ($) ADES Construction Manufacturing Trade, Transportation, Utilities Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Utilities Communications Amusements Rentals - Personal Property Contracting Mining - Metal, Oil & Gas Hotel/Motel New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Bankruptcy Filings, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Total Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 13 SEP 2005 OCT 2005 2,863.8 2,719.1 144.7 4.8 DEC 2005 JAN 2006 2,876.7 2,740.2 136.5 4.8 2,882.5 2,753.4 129.1 4.7 2,886.8 2,764.8 122.0 4.7 2,880.5 2,736.3 144.2 4.8 3.3 2.9 11.6 6.7 3.0 3.1 -0.0 -3.4 2,533.8 8.2 225.5 147.0 18.4 45.2 26.9 34.9 98.8 304.1 11.8 69.2 44.8 126.9 49.4 377.4 41.0 236.0 30.7 44.7 177.3 94.3 52.4 359.4 193.4 40.0 2,563.0 8.2 228.7 147.4 18.6 45.2 26.9 34.9 100.0 309.9 11.9 70.4 45.0 126.8 49.9 382.1 42.1 237.2 31.4 46.3 179.5 95.1 52.3 363.9 198.0 40.9 2,588.1 9.5 229.5 147.5 18.6 45.2 26.9 35.3 100.8 322.3 11.9 70.5 44.9 127.6 50.3 384.7 42.7 238.3 31.7 46.4 181.4 95.4 52.0 365.4 200.1 40.9 2,603.4 9.6 231.1 147.6 18.9 45.3 27.0 35.9 102.4 327.9 11.9 70.6 45.0 128.3 51.1 388.1 42.4 238.8 32.4 46.5 182.5 95.8 52.2 363.3 198.4 40.5 2,549.1 9.6 227.2 147.7 18.5 45.3 27.0 35.4 102.0 316.7 11.7 69.9 44.5 126.7 50.2 377.4 41.6 239.3 31.9 45.9 180.3 93.1 51.0 347.0 182.2 40.5 5.6 11.6 14.1 3.1 5.1 2.3 2.7 0.3 4.5 5.7 2.6 2.3 0.7 5.2 7.0 9.1 3.5 5.9 9.2 3.1 6.8 5.7 0.6 0.6 1.1 -1.9 5.4 6.0 14.1 2.9 5.3 1.6 1.5 0.6 4.1 6.1 2.2 3.2 -3.0 4.9 7.3 9.0 5.8 5.1 5.0 2.6 6.0 4.0 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.4 15.99 14.31 14.98 12.21 18.72 15.92 14.18 15.10 12.27 18.47 15.98 14.33 14.96 12.19 18.65 16.12 14.15 14.86 12.01 18.46 16.21 14.45 15.14 12.37 18.34 5.7 0.3 2.6 3.6 -0.4 3.7 2.4 4.2 3.7 1.4 6,280,822 4,126,716 820,022 688,631 645,453 221,691 779,801 256,987 54,781 281,046 1,674,482 115,262 151,767 6,335,096 4,126,716 856,519 729,655 622,205 226,314 687,685 273,566 71,562 311,101 1,538,518 116,387 183,780 6,396,032 4,295,849 875,076 718,498 506,608 211,175 511,689 258,754 90,441 314,168 1,700,777 114,584 177,613 7,938,915 5,783,926 884,941 774,478 495,569 229,526 630,229 260,600 77,647 298,120 1,945,382 142,304 158,540 ... ... ... ... 516,023 225,377 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 13.4 14.5 11.6 8.7 28.5 1.2 19.6 9.4 4.4 3.0 30.7 43.9 12.1 13.7 13.7 11.0 12.4 20.4 1.0 9.8 6.3 10.4 6.5 26.2 58.1 15.1 7,722 6,584 83 1,055 7,466 5,812 199 1,455 5,428 5,155 86 187 6,452 5,567 207 678 6,675 5,250 312 1,113 12.8 -0.7 171.3 116.5 -0.3 -3.0 -10.1 41.1 4,950 4,557 13 379 11,007 10,410 20 577 388 106 13 269 245 166 6 73 298 212 8 78 -84.9 -85.9 -57.9 -82.9 23.6 35.0 -23.3 -28.3 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. 18. % change versus year ago for most recent: month 12-months NOV 2005 A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S MEASURES OF INFLATION AND PRICES -QUARTERLY DATA Consumer Price index (1982-84=100) BLS Western Region (U.S.) U.S. - All Urban Consumers U.S. - Urban Wage Earners Price Indexes (1996=100) BEA Gross Domestic Product Personal Consumption Expenditures % change versus year ago for most recent: quarter 4-quarters IV 2004 I 2005 II 2005 III 2005 IV 2005 194.8 190.7 186.4 195.8 191.9 187.4 198.5 194.5 190.1 200.0 196.9 192.7 201.3 197.6 193.4 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.1 3.4 3.5 110.1 109.3 111.0 109.9 111.7 110.8 112.6 111.8 113.1 112.6 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.8 See sources and abbreviations at the bottom of page 16. • For additional detail and history, subscribe to Arizona Economic Indicators Data Book. To subscribe to Arizona's Economy or other Economic and Business Research Publications, visit: www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu/subscribe/. Arizona’s Economy, published quarterly by the Economic and Business Research Center at the Eller College of Management, is provided as an educational service by The University of Arizona. Correspondence should be addressed to EBR Publications, McClelland Hall Room 103, PO Box 210108, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108. Eller College of Management Dean........................................................................Paul R. Portney Vice Dean ................................................................Stanley Reynolds Director of Marketing and Communications ............Julie S. Krell Arizona’s Economy also is available online at: www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu/azeconomy/. Economic and Business Research Center: As part of The University of Arizona’s public mission to improve quality of life for the people of Arizona and the nation, the Economic and Business Research Center is dedicated to providing Arizona citizens and decision makers with high quality economic data and objective forecasts and analyses. Copyright 2006 by The University of Arizona. Information contained in this publication may be copied or reprinted with credit to the Eller College of Management at The University of Arizona. Printing and mailing costs for Arizona’s Economy are covered by private sponsorship and not at tax-payer expense. Main phone/fax ......................................................520.621.2155 fax: 520.621.2150 Director ..................................................................Marshall J. Vest 520.621.4075 Senior Research Economist ....................................Alberta Charney 520.621.2291 Database Administrator ..........................................Pia Montoya 520.621.2523 Senior Researcher and Webmaster ..........................Maile Nadelhoffer 520.621.4050 State Data Center and Librarian ..............................Valorie Rice 520.621.2109 Thank you to our partners for their ongoing sponsorship of Economic and Business Research Center programs. Arizona’s Economy Sponsor: Forecasting Project Sponsors: Arizona Department of Commerce City of Tucson Pima Association of Governments Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Compass Bank Pima County Arizona Public Service Company Elliott D. Pollack and Company Realty Executives Southern Arizona CB Richard Ellis KB Home Salt River Project Chase Lippow Development Company Tucson Electric Power Company City of Glendale Maricopa Association of Governments Tucson Newspapers City of Mesa Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities, Inc. Website Sponsor: City of Tempe www.ebr.eller.arizona.edu 19. Breakfast with the Economists: A Mid-Year Economic Update Make the Right Decision. The quality of one’s decisions grows from the quality of the information upon which they are based. The Arizona Business Leaders Confidence Index ® (BLCI), a collaborative effort by Compass Bank and The University of Arizona’s Eller College of Management, provides executives like you with valuable perspectives on the latest economic news and business trends. Please log on at www.blci.com/arizona/ and register to become a BLCI panelist. It only takes a few minutes and you’ll be notified by email when the next survey opens on June 1st. With increased participation from business leaders like you, the BLCI will become a more valuable planning tool for the Arizona business community. Plus, when you participate, you receive an exclusive preview of survey results before they are released to the general public. Join us for breakfast as The University of Arizona economists Gerald Swanson and Marshall Vest review the nation’s current situation regarding budget deficits, national debt, and mid-year economic forecast for the State and Metro economies. When: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 7:00 am – 8:45 am Where: Doubletree Hotel Tucson at Reid Park 445 South Alvernon Way Cost: $20.00 per person Reservations: outlook@eller.arizona.edu or 520.626.8666 Sponsored by Chase Join today! PRSRT. STD. U.S. POSTAGE P A I D TUCSON, ARIZONA Economic and Business Research Center Eller College of Management McClelland Hall 103 PO Box 210108 Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108 CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED PERMIT NO. 190 Change of address, please email: ebrpublications@eller.arizona.edu