S E P T E M B E R 1 9 9 7 F A L L ARIZONA TO REMAIN “A LAND OF POSSIBILITIES” Marshall J. Vest, Forecasting Project Director August 1, 1997 EXHIBIT 1 AZ is consistently One of the Fastest-Growing States PERIOD 1900 - 95 This quarter’s forecast pushes the horizon out to the year 2020. Our annual visit of the long-term shows slightly more growth and higher numbers than what we published one year ago. This reflects recent boosts to current estimates for employment and population (so we’re jumping off from a higher starting point) as well as the economy’s amazing strength witnessed in the past four years, which prompts us to raise the rate of growth in the near term. These projections show that Arizona will continue to be a “land of possibilities” for many new residents. T he recent Ken Burns’ PBS miniseries, The West, described the early western United States as “a land of possibilities – a place where a man could bring his family in hopes of making a better life.” Since the early 1800’s, when the first trappers headed west from St. Louis to make their fortunes in the fur trade, people have been moving west. The discovery of gold in California started a rush of migrants to its farthest reaches. Hordes came to harvest the bounty of a land rich in timber and buffalo and prairies covered with waist-high grasses. The prairies filled with cattle and the cowboys who tended them. More came to build the railroads, which opened the western United States to homesteaders and settlements. Mormons fled religious persecution to settle the Great Basin region. Perhaps one of the most vivid pictures of the westward movement was the Oklahoma land rush, with wagons pulled by teams of horses at break-neck speed leaving the starting line. Today, Arizona and other mountain and pacific states continue to be “a land of possibilities,” as large numbers of people continue to in-migrate. During the first half of this decade, the top five states for population growth were Nevada, Idaho, Arizona, Colorado and Utah, in that order. Arizona is the largest of these five states, with a mid-year 1997 population in excess of 4.5 million. During this century, four of the fastestgrowing states are in the west, with Florida as the only exception. Arizona ranks second only to Nevada, followed by Florida, California and Washington (Exhibit 1). During this century’s first 95 years, the top five in each decade have included such widely-dispersed states as Alaska, Washington DC, New Mexico, New Jersey, Minnesota, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. Most have brief visits to the winner’s circle. In this horse race, the top states have consistently been there almost every decade, with the exception of Washington, which was never far out of the money. At the beginning of the 20th century, only 124,000 people called Arizona home. Since then Arizona has consistently ranked among the fastest-growing states, failing to make the top five in only two decades: the aughts (1900-10) and the 30’s. It ranked seventh I S S U E RANK TOP 5 STATES 2 NV, AZ, FL, CA,WA 7 WA, OK, ID, NV, ND BY DECADE 1900 - 10 1910 - 20 1 AZ, CA, MT, WY, DC 1920 - 30 4 CA, FL, MI, AZ, NJ DC, FL, NM, NV, CA 1930 - 40 7 1940 - 50 2 CA, AZ, FL, NV, OR 1950 - 60 4 FL, NV, AK, AZ, CA 1960 - 70 3 NV, FL, AZ, AK, CA 1970 - 80 2 NV, AZ, FL, WY, UT 1980 - 90 3 NV, AK, AZ, FL, CA 1990 - 95 3 NV, ID, AZ, CO, UT in both decades. Over the first 95 years, Arizona’s population growth has averaged 3.8% per year. The fastest growth recorded, 5.7% per year, came during the 1950’s. THE OUTLOOK There is plenty of additional growth on the horizon. During the next five years (1997-2001): ■ Arizona’s population will increase by 587,300, or 117,500 per year. For the entire decade of the 1990’s some 1.177 million new residents will be added. That’s a larger gain than in the 1980s (989,000) or during the 1970s (943,000). By the year 2000, some 4.9 million persons will reside in Arizona. Arizona will gain at I N S I D E DATA SHORTCOMINGS...........5 FORECAST TABLES ................6 OUTLOOK LUNCHEON ...........7 ARIZONA ECONOMIC INDICATORS........................8 ELLER GRADUAT E SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT • COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION T H E U N I V E R S I T Y OF A R I Z O N A TUCSON, ARIZONA EXHIBIT 3 Projections to the year 2020 ARIZONA W&S Employment (000s) Population (000s) 1990 1995 2000 1,483 1,795 2,139 2005 2,479 2010 2,893 2015 3,340 2020 3,800 3,728 4,297 4,905 5,491 6,125 6,785 7,450 Personal Income ($ millions) 60,852 86,420 122,261 169,658 236,117 328,141 452,541 Retail Sales ($ millions) 26,722 37,789 49,317 64,399 85,133 112,912 149,710 2,564 PHOENIX-MESA MA W&S Employment (000s) 1,013 1,225 1,468 1,674 1,967 2,277 Population (000s) 2,293 2,658 3,067 3,463 3,936 4,450 4,963 Personal Income ($ millions) 40,237 57,539 82,181 109,101 151,426 214,767 295,683 Retail Sales ($ millions) 17,333 24,946 33,001 41,795 55,284 74,697 98,888 TUCSON METRO AREA W&S Employment (000s) 252 303 346 399 466 535 594 Population (000s) 670 758 846 943 1,057 1,177 1,284 10,213 14,652 19,713 25,950 35,297 48,875 65,815 4,668 6,288 8,056 10,262 13,487 18,288 24,314 Personal Income ($ millions) Retail Sales ($ millions) EXHIBIT 2 Annual Changes in Population, AZ least two and most likely three additional seats in Congress. ■ Some 298,000 new jobs will be created. Job growth will average 3.0% per year (compared to 3.9% during the 1980s). ■ Personal income will grow by an average 6.8% annually, and will exceed $122 billion in the year 2000. ■ Average annual wages will rise at a 4.0% annual rate and top $32,300 by 2000. Inflation in Metro Phoenix will average 3.3% per year. ■ Per capita income will rise to nearly $25,000, an annual increase of 4.2%. ■ PAGE TWO By the year 2020, Arizona is expected to add another three million residents, and population will approach 7.5 million. That’s about as large as North Carolina and Georgia (the nation’s 10th and 11th largest states) are today. As of 1995, Arizona’s population ranked 24th, and with the magnitude of change predicted, Arizona will move up quickly in the rankings. Population growth varies significantly over the business cycle as shown in Exhibit 2. During the recession in the early 90’s, Arizona’s population increased by less than 90,000 per year. From 1994-96, those numbers rose into the 130-135,000 range, as the economy soared. The forecast calls for a slowing through the rest of this decade to roughly 110,000 in the year 2000. Thereafter, population gains return to “trend line” with increases approaching 140,000 in the year 2020. Arizona’s resident population should break the five million mark in 2001, six million in 2009, and seven million in 2017 (Exhibit 3). Employment also varies greatly over the business cycle. From an average of nearly 105,000 net new jobs created in each of the past three years, job growth should cool to 50,000 or so by the end of this decade. Thereafter, job growth is forecast to return to “trend” of 80-85,000 net new jobs per year. Per capita income (PCI) in 2020 will exceed $60,000. Arizona PCI as a percentage of national PCI is expected to be at 92% 25- years-hence, about five points higher than where it is today. In real terms, per capita income is expected to grow by 1.6% per year during the projection period. Earlier this year, total personal income surpassed a major milestone: $100 billion. In the year 2020, it will exceed $450 billion. With population growing by 2.2% per year and employment increasing at a 2.9% annual rate, the state’s employment to population ratio will continue to increase. While less than one-fourth of the population in 1960 was employed, by 1996 that ratio reached 43%. By the year 2020, over one-half of the population will be working. To house Arizona’s new residents, approximately 45,000 new housing units each year (on average) will need to be constructed. Roughly 30,000 will be single family units. METRO AREA OUTLOOK The Phoenix-Mesa metro area is undergoing a transformation and is quickly becoming a really large and diversified economy, serving a region that transcends Arizona’s borders. With a mid-year 1997 population of 2.84 million, it is the “mega-city” of the southwest. During the next five years, some 390,000 additional people will be added. That’s about 78,000 per year. A year 2000 population of 3.07 million is projected. Roughly 29,000 new housing units each year ARIZONA'S ECONOMY EXHIBIT 4 Personal Income and Individual Income Tax Receipts, AZ EXHIBIT 5 Wage & Salary Disbursements and Individual Withholding, AZ EXHIBIT 6 Corporate Income Tax Collections, AZ AR IZ ON A 'S E CON O MY will be needed to house the new residents. By the year 2020, almost five million persons will live in Metro Phoenix. That’s about as large as today’s Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint and Dallas-Ft. Worth metro areas, the nation’s 7th and 8th largest. Today, the Phoenix-Mesa metro area ranks 17th. As the nation’s 57th largest metro area, Tucson will continue to grow about half as fast as Metro Phoenix. Its population count rises from 794,000 today to 846,000 by the turn of the century. That is an average increase of 17,000 per year. Nearly 7,000 new housing units per year will be needed. By the year 2020, Tucson’s population is projected to exceed 1.25 million. Metro Phoenix will account for 73% of Arizona’s new residents and 72% of the new jobs created through 2020. The Phoenix area will represent two-thirds of Arizona’s population 25 years from now, up from 62% today. RECENT EVIDENCE Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Alan Greenspan, said it all in testimony to Congress in late July when he described the economy as “exceptional.” After more than six years of expansion, the nation’s economy will likely grow by nearly 3.5% this year. At midyear, unemployment stands at a 24-year low, consumer confidence is the highest level ever recorded, and financial markets continue to amaze, establishing new records almost daily. Remarkably, inflation shows no signs of accelerating, and is expected to register only 2.5% or less this year at the consumer level. And remember, the consumer price index is a measure that the Boskin Committee recently found to be overstating actual inflation by 1.1%. So, inflation may be lower than we think, and real growth even stronger. Data covering the past two years for gross domestic product (GDP) will soon be revised significantly higher. That may help explain why income tax revenues are growing well beyond expectations, which may drive the federal deficit below $50 billion this year. An old proverb states that “when things are too good to last, they eventually come to an end,” but so far, there is nothing visible to suggest a reversal of the best business climate since the 1960’s. The forecast assumes that policy-makers at the Fed will be able to slow growth in real GDP next year to 2.2%, a pace equal to the economy’s longterm growth potential. This, in turn, is expected to keep inflation from re-accelerating. Arizona’s economy could hardly be better. After three consecutive years of very strong growth, the state’s economy is still surging. Jobs continue to grow at a five percent annual rate, unemployment is at a 13-year low of 4.3%, consumer confidence stands at an all-time record high, housing markets are surprisingly strong, and tax dollars continue to pour into state coffers. Highlights of the too-good-to-be-true economy follow. Nonag jobs increased 5.3% during the 12month period ending in May. That’s slower than the 7.5% rate of mid-1994, but still surprisingly strong given that this is the seventh year of this business expansion. In a ranking using data through April1, Arizona’s job growth was second only to Nevada. The Phoenix-Mesa metro area was the fastestgrowing large metro market (over 750,000 workers), and the third-fastest when compared to all (some 291) metro areas. The fastest-growing sectors during the past year are found in services, schools, transportation and mining, all registering job growth greater than 7.0% (comparing 12 months versus 12 months). Wholesale trade is up a strong 6.4%. Significantly, since both are notorious for wide swings, both the manufacturing and construction industries continue to add to payrolls. Construction jobs stand at an all-time record high 130,000. Likewise for manufacturing, with nearly 205,000. Arizona’s unemployment rate fell to 4.3% in June, well below the 5.0% rate recorded nationwide. Less than 110,000 were unemployed, down more than 30,000 during the past year. As Arizona’s experiment with moving welfare recipients into jobs gets rolling during the next year, unemployment should fall further. Tight labor markets are pushing up wages at the fastest pace in recent years in nearly every sector. Construction wages in May were up 15.2% from May of 1996, while copper mining wages rose 10.0%, and retail trade rose 8.8%. After falling during the summer of 1996, help wanted advertising in Metro Phoenix has moved back up to readings near the high point for this business cycle. The Conference Board compiles the help wanted index. Arizona’s home building industry remains remarkably strong. Building permits, after peaking in early 1996, have stabilized at a 48,000 unit annual rate. Single family permits peaked in early 1994, but after falling for better than a year shot up to establish a new peak in early 1996. So far this year, single PA GE TH RE E family permits have been moving upward again to a 41,000 annual rate. Both retail sales and restaurant and bar (R&B) sales are showing growth in the neighborhood of five to six percent. Growth rates for both peaked in 1994 and have been slowing as consumers satisfy their pent-up demand and as they use up available sources of credit. Special events including the Super Bowl affected last year’s R&B numbers. The 12-month versus 12-month comparisons jumped by two percent as a result. At five to six percent growth, dollar sales are still healthy, growing at twice the rate of inflation. The sales slowdown is spread pretty evenly across the various categories, according to SO FAR, THERE IS NOTHING VISIBLE TO SUGGEST A REVERSAL OF THE BEST BUSINESS CLIMATE SINCE THE 1960’S. breakouts provided by the Arizona Department of Revenue (DOR). During the twelve months that ended in April, sales at motor vehicle dealers rose only 3.9%. Apparel and furniture stores increased by like amounts. Miscellaneous stores and building materials registered the largest gains, posting 8.4% and 7.5%, respectively. General merchandise stores saw sales increase by less than one percent. WHY ARE TAX RECEIPTS SURGING? Tax revenues are pouring into Uncle Sam’s coffers, and there is a good chance that the federal budget deficit may fall below $50 billion this year. Surging income taxes are the reason. But economists are hard pressed to explain why. Income taxes are coming in faster than wages would suggest. A soaring stock market may be the answer. Over the past three years, market averages have posted total returns approaching 30% annually. Mutual funds must pay income to investors, PA GE F OU R who in turn must pay taxes on the proceeds, whether reinvested or received in cash. Taxes from last year’s dividends and capital gains would be reflected on this year’s tax returns. Surging income tax receipts also are evident in Arizona. In May, individual income tax collections increased 31.9% from one year earlier. Comparing 12 months to 12 months, collections jumped by nearly 12% (Exhibit 4). Since this year’s collections reflect liability for 1996, the strong flows suggest that official statistics for personal income are grossly understated. We expect these estimates to be revised upward, when BEA revises its estimates in September. Current personal income estimates show growth of only seven percent during the second half of last year. The dividends, interest and rents component (which contains the effects of movements in financial markets) currently shows a gain of only 4.7% for all of 1996. These numbers hardly reflect a booming stock market. But, that’s not the whole the story. Wage & salary disbursements and individual withholding also have diverged – but in the opposite direction! As shown in Exhibit 5, wage & salary disbursements have been increasing at a strong 9-10% annual rate during the past four quarters. In early 1996, withholding jumped well into double-digit territory. But early this year, gains fell into the 3-4% range. This reflects huge bonuses (averaging $5,000 per worker) paid during the first quarter of 1996 to workers in the copper mining industry. Those bonuses were not repeated in 1997, which accounts for the large fall. So, in addition to a strong stock market, one-time bonuses in 1996 also help explain the jump in this year’s income tax collections. So far this year, surging income taxes have kept state government tax collections growing at a high rate, even as collections from sales taxes have moderated. Will the income tax continue to carry the day as we go forward? The falloff in withholding portends disappointing individual collections next spring. Meanwhile, corporate income taxes have increased nearly 35% during the past year (Exhibit 6). That may have as much to do with weakness during early 1996 as with strong corporate profits today. Most likely, corporate tax gains will settle in the neighborhood of 10% next year. $ 1 Blue Chip Job Growth Update: Ranking the States & MSA, ASU College of Business, June 1997. A CORRECTION REGARDING POPULATION n last quarter’s report, we compared I population estimates from three different sources: the US Census Bureau, the Arizona Department of Economic Security and Arizona State University. We stated in reference to the 1995 Special Census that “DES doesn’t show this number because it does not revise previously published estimates.” In fact, DES has revised its 1995 number to reflect the Special Census results. Moreover, they do revise estimates when they have data from a decennial or special census. Later this summer they will revise estimates for the 1991-94 period. This does not change our conclusion, however: that the ASU estimates are the most realistic time series for the 1990-96 time period. Therefore, we continue to use the ASU estimates in our models. $ S P O N S O R S Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Arizona Public Service Company Bank One Arizona City of Tucson Estes Homebuilding Company Pima County Salt River Project Territorial Newspapers Tucson Electric Power Company Tucson Newspapers U S West Communications U S West Dex ARIZONA'S ECONOMY DATA SHORTCOMINGS CONFOUND COUNTY ANALYSIS Marshall J. Vest, Forecasting Project Director August 1, 1997 Analysts continue to be challenged to measure and understand what’s happening in a rapidly transforming economy, while faced with inadequate budgets for statistical gathering and an increased unwillingness of business firms to provide important information. IN SHORT... A growing number of companies with multiple locations are no longer providing the state with employee counts by county. As a result, their employee counts for the entire state are being reported in Maricopa County. This inflates growth in the Phoenix area, while seriously understating job creation in the remainder of the state. These companies are behaving rationally in the short term by minimizing compliance costs, since the state does not require this information (reporting is voluntary). However, in the long term, the quality of investment decisions will suffer as the data deteriorates, leading to a misallocation of resources. Isn't this a compelling reason for all companies to report individual county totals? ucson’s economy slowed to a crawl in 1995, prompting many analysts to ask the question, “What is wrong with Tucson?” After all, Tucson’s economy was on a roll in 1994 with job growth at a robust 6.3% (17,300 new jobs). But by mid-year 1995, job growth had receded to less than two percent. Meanwhile, statewide gains were running nearly three times that amount! It was as if Tucson’s economy had run into a wall. One possible explanation was the devaluation of the Mexican peso at the end of 1994, which negatively affected retail sales. The construction industry also was downsizing following modest overbuilding, particularly in the luxury apartment market. Thirdly, the large gains in manufacturing employment during 1994 turned into small losses. These explanations were the best that analysts had at the time, but Tucson’s rapid change in fortune was still incomprehensible. Never before had the economy lost momentum so rapidly. The mystery is now solved: there were major problems with the data. Revisions to the job numbers now show that Tucson’s job base grew by 3.8% during 1995, not 2.4%. That is 11,200 new jobs rather than only 7,000 as reported. Although the new numbers still represent a slow down from the prior year, the economy’s perceived health is not so grave. There were a number of problems with the data (and some problems still remain). But first, a review of the revision process is T ARIZONA'S ECONOMY helpful. In January of 1996, when the figures were in for all of 1995, the numbers showed Tucson’s job base growing by 2.6% (7,500 jobs). A couple of months later, the preliminary numbers were revised as part of an annual “rebenchmarking.” We expected a significant upward revision into the 4-5% range. But, estimates were revised downward instead, to show a 2.4% gain, or 7,000 jobs. Finally, in March of 1997 a second revision was released that boosts job growth to 3.8%, an 11,200 increase. These numbers could receive another boost next year. Could the understatement of jobs be happening again, this time to the estimates for 1996? In January of this year, preliminary estimates for the entire year showed an increase of 2.3% or 7,000 jobs. A couple of months later, the estimates were revised downward to show a weak 1.8% gain, or 5,400 jobs. We won’t know until the end of the first quarter of next year, when the annual revisions are again released, whether current estimates will hold or be revised significantly upward once again. In addition to driving forecasters crazy, misstatements of this magnitude can have deleterious effects on investment decisions. Tucson currently has a serious shortage of available industrial properties, particularly in excess of 100,000 square feet. Yet speculative building remains nonexistent, because of lack of financing. Economic developers report losing a number of prospective new businesses during the past year because of the lack of available properties. Lenders rely heavily on job growth to judge the vitality of a community and whether to finance new projects. Understated job figures are no doubt partially responsible for giving lenders the impression that there is “something wrong with Tucson.” This lack of building is, in turn, holding back the economy and depressing job growth. A number of steps are being taken to improve the accuracy of employment data and lessen the size of future revisions. Adoption of probabilistic sampling techniques, a new touch-tone data entry system for employers, a new industry classification system that standardizes codes for the US, Canada and Mexico, and improved techniques to estimate new businesses are being implemented. One major problem that will be hard to fix involves large retailers’ unwillingness to report the number of employees by county. These are large department stores or other national or regional firms that have multiple outlets spread across the state. Firms are required by state unemployment insurance laws to report total wages paid in each calendar quarter when unemployment insurance premiums are remitted to the State. On the back of this form is an area that asks companies to voluntarily provide employment counts for each month of the quarter. For employers with multiple work sites, there is a second form that requests job counts by county. This also is voluntary. During the past year or so, several large department stores have stopped providing this information. For these firms, total state-wide employee counts have been “rolled up” into and reported in Maricopa County. The effect on Pima County data is that the general merchandise & apparel category sheds over 1,000 jobs during 1996, and “other retail trade” shows a cumulative decline of 1,100 over the past two years. As a result, Tucson’s retail trade employment is reported to have dropped by 1.8% in 1996 while total dollar sales increased by 3.5%. In the Phoenix area, employment grew 4.6% while sales increased 8.3%. In short, job counts for Phoenix are overstated (slightly – the base is huge) while figures for other counties are seriously understated. Business firms have legitimate concerns about the cost involved in reporting figures to the government, but it is important for businesses to provide this information. The payback for doing so is much more accurate data on which to base investment decisions.$ PAGE FIVE F O R E C A S T T A B L E S Compound Annual Growth Rates Forecasts for Arizona Personal Income ($ mill) percent change Per Capita Personal Income percent change Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* percent change Population (000s, mid-year) percent change Net Migration (000s) Wage & Salary Employment (000s) percent change Goods-Producing percent change Construction percent change Manufacturing percent change Service-Providing percent change Trade (Wholesale & Retail) percent change Services percent change 1991 63,767.8 4.8 16,710.6 2.4 27,490.9 2.9 3,816.0 2.4 56.7 1,491.4 0.6 266.6 -4.9 77.2 -6.5 176.1 -4.9 1,224.8 1.9 370.3 0.8 409.9 2.4 1996 93,454.2 8.1 21,095.8 4.9 40,369.0 6.8 4,430.0 3.1 94.2 1,898.3 5.7 344.3 5.5 127.0 6.1 202.9 4.8 1,553.9 5.8 465.4 4.7 559.0 7.7 1997 100,792.7 7.9 22,101.8 4.8 42,410.8 5.1 4,560.4 2.9 86.1 1,972.2 3.9 353.6 2.7 126.7 -0.3 212.2 4.6 1,618.7 4.2 478.6 2.8 593.5 6.2 1998 107,852.2 7.0 23,048.4 4.3 44,539.5 5.0 4,679.4 2.6 76.3 2,032.4 3.1 357.7 1.2 125.7 -0.8 216.8 2.2 1,674.8 3.5 491.5 2.7 624.5 5.2 1999 114,903.6 6.5 23,974.4 4.0 46,829.8 5.1 4,792.8 2.4 72.3 2,084.9 2.6 356.6 -0.3 124.2 -1.2 217.0 0.1 1,728.3 3.2 505.4 2.8 652.5 4.5 2000 122,316.5 6.5 24,941.3 4.0 49,312.2 5.3 4,904.2 2.3 72.7 2,141.6 2.7 359.2 0.7 124.7 0.4 219.0 0.9 1,782.4 3.1 519.7 2.8 681.7 4.5 2001 130,051.3 6.3 25,920.3 3.9 52,053.8 5.6 5,017.3 2.3 74.4 2,202.4 2.8 363.8 1.3 127.1 2.0 221.2 1.0 1,838.6 3.2 533.8 2.7 712.5 4.5 Forecasts for Phoenix-Mesa Metro Area Personal Income ($ mill) 41,844.3 percent change 4.0 Per Capita Personal Income 17,827.8 percent change 1.6 Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* 17,580.6 percent change 1.4 Population (000s, mid-year) 2,347.1 percent change 2.3 Net Migration (000s) 28.4 Wage & Salary Employment (000s) 1,009.0 percent change -0.4 Goods-Producing 191.5 percent change -5.7 Construction 51.3 percent change -8.6 Manufacturing 134.7 percent change -5.2 Service-Providing 817.5 percent change 0.9 Trade (Wholesale & Retail) 251.2 percent change -0.6 Services 283.2 percent change 2.0 63,646.2 10.6 23,157.7 7.0 27,282.8 9.4 2,748.4 3.4 63.9 1,310.5 7.0 254.9 6.7 90.6 6.8 157.4 6.1 1,055.6 7.0 322.2 5.5 399.7 9.5 69,306.8 8.9 24,412.7 5.4 29,069.0 6.5 2,839.0 3.3 63.0 1,372.1 4.7 267.5 5.0 94.1 3.9 166.6 5.8 1,104.6 4.6 334.4 3.8 425.0 6.3 73,773.3 6.4 25,263.0 3.5 30,404.3 4.6 2,920.2 2.9 52.9 1,412.4 2.9 270.1 1.0 92.6 -1.6 170.7 2.5 1,142.3 3.4 342.3 2.4 446.8 5.1 78,145.4 5.9 26,093.0 3.3 31,740.2 4.4 2,994.9 2.6 45.6 1,441.0 2.0 267.6 -0.9 90.0 -2.8 170.8 0.1 1,173.4 2.7 348.1 1.7 465.2 4.1 82,180.7 5.2 26,795.3 2.7 33,000.9 4.0 3,067.0 2.4 42.6 1,467.6 1.8 265.6 -0.8 88.1 -2.1 170.6 -0.1 1,202.0 2.4 353.2 1.5 484.0 4.0 86,232.0 4.9 27,465.5 2.5 34,326.1 4.0 3,139.6 2.4 42.9 1,497.5 2.0 265.8 0.1 88.1 0.0 170.8 0.1 1,231.6 2.5 358.5 1.5 503.2 4.0 Forecasts for Tucson Metro Area Personal Income ($ mill) percent change Per Capita Personal Income percent change Aggregate Retail Sales ($ mill)* percent change Population (000s, mid-year) percent change Net Migration (000s) Wage & Salary Employment (000s) percent change Goods-Producing percent change Construction percent change Manufacturing percent change Service-Providing percent change Trade (Wholesale & Retail) percent change Services percent change 15,487.0 5.7 19,931.7 3.1 6,558.0 4.3 777.0 2.5 14.5 309.9 2.4 49.5 -0.1 19.7 2.1 27.4 -2.2 260.4 2.9 68.9 1.6 96.1 5.2 16,538.7 6.8 20,838.2 4.5 6,923.0 5.6 793.7 2.1 12.0 320.1 3.3 50.7 2.5 19.5 -1.3 28.6 4.7 269.4 3.5 70.0 1.7 101.0 5.1 17,526.5 6.0 21,605.0 3.7 7,264.9 4.9 811.2 2.2 12.7 328.8 2.7 51.8 2.2 19.5 -0.0 29.6 3.4 277.0 2.8 71.3 1.9 105.6 4.5 18,649.5 6.4 22,512.8 4.2 7,665.0 5.5 828.4 2.1 12.0 337.1 2.5 53.1 2.4 20.0 2.5 30.1 1.4 284.0 2.5 72.8 2.1 109.7 3.9 19,712.9 5.7 23,300.3 3.5 8,055.7 5.1 846.0 2.1 12.1 346.2 2.7 54.6 2.9 20.9 4.8 30.4 1.2 291.6 2.7 74.4 2.2 114.1 4.1 20,715.5 5.1 23,972.5 2.9 8,426.9 4.6 864.1 2.1 12.5 355.5 2.7 56.0 2.4 21.8 4.3 30.7 1.1 299.5 2.7 76.1 2.2 118.8 4.1 10,840.1 6.1 15,894.6 4.3 4,900.9 5.0 682.0 1.8 6.4 258.3 2.6 41.5 -3.1 14.1 -2.4 25.1 -4.2 216.8 3.8 61.0 3.5 75.6 3.3 91-96 96-01 91-01 7.9 6.8 7.4 4.8 4.2 4.5 8.0 5.2 6.6 3.0 2.5 2.8 10.7 4.9 -4.6 3.0 2.8 4.0 5.2 1.1 3.2 10.5 0.0 5.1 2.9 1.7 2.3 4.9 3.4 4.1 4.7 2.8 3.7 6.4 5.0 5.7 8.7 6.3 7.5 5.4 3.5 4.4 9.2 4.7 6.9 3.2 2.7 3.0 17.6 5.4 -7.6 2.7 4.2 4.0 5.9 0.8 3.3 12.0 -0.5 5.6 3.2 1.6 2.4 5.2 3.1 4.2 5.1 2.2 3.6 7.1 4.7 5.9 7.4 6.0 6.7 4.6 3.8 4.2 6.0 5.1 2.6 2.1 2.4 17.9 3.7 -2.9 2.8 7.0 3.2 3.6 2.5 3.0 6.9 2.0 4.4 1.8 2.4 2.1 3.7 2.8 3.3 2.4 2.0 2.2 4.9 4.3 4.6 * Aggregate Retail Sales includes retail, food, restaurant & bars and gasoline sales Source: Economic and Business Research Program, Karl Eller Graduate School of Management, College of Business and Public Administration, The University of Arizona PAGE SIX ARIZONA'S ECONOMY The Local Economy: A New Paradigm? Find out at The University of Arizona College of Business and Public Administration’s: 1998/1999 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK LUNCHEON Presentations by Marshall J. Vest Economic and Business Research Program Gerald J. Swanson Economics Department Mark Zupan Dean of the College of Business and Public Administration Friday, December 12, 1997 Noon-2:00 p.m. Westin La Paloma $35 per person; $325 per table of 10* Reservations required. Call 621-2930 for information and reservations ARIZONA'S ECONOMY P AG E S E VEN A R I Z O N A YUMA METROPOLITAN REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses MOHAVE-LA PAZ REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 60,775 48,900 11,875 19.5 65,675 47,650 18,025 27.4 68,000 48,700 19,300 28.4 69,675 47,975 21,700 31.1 70,350 46,725 23,625 33.6 -5.7 4.5 -21.1 -16.3 1.6 0.9 3.4 1.9 38,200 0 2,100 1,600 1,900 12,200 1,200 9,200 10,000 37,300 0 1,900 1,600 1,900 11,800 1,100 9,100 9,900 36,600 0 2,000 1,600 1,900 11,200 1,100 9,000 9,800 36,000 0 2,000 1,600 1,900 11,100 1,100 9,000 9,300 34,500 0 2,000 1,600 1,900 10,900 1,100 9,000 8,000 4.5 ... 5.3 6.7 11.8 5.8 0.0 11.1 -4.8 3.8 ... 9.0 0.5 0.4 1.4 -7.9 9.1 4.1 83,050 63,186 10,059 9,805 7,394 11,332 66,976 54,066 7,400 5,510 4,093 11,081 65,228 50,240 7,743 7,245 5,616 12,064 60,888 48,053 6,338 6,497 5,211 11,200 ... ... ... ... ... ... 110.2 198.3 9.9 -8.3 4.9 17.4 8.7 9.5 7.0 4.7 -0.4 -0.1 11,088 6,609 3,222 1,257 24,803 7,230 16,583 990 32,302 6,822 23,317 2,163 12,636 5,664 5,132 1,840 14,705 5,410 4,468 4,827 33.9 26.6 30.3 47.4 32.4 17.6 107.2 -36.4 86 86 92 92 87 87 72 72 58 58 9.4 9.4 23.9 10.3 69,575 65,725 3,850 5.5 69,475 66,175 3,300 4.7 70,475 66,925 3,550 5.0 71,675 68,025 3,650 5.1 72,100 68,525 3,575 5.0 3.2 6.0 -31.3 -33.4 2.8 3.5 -5.5 -8.2 40,100 200 3,100 3,000 2,000 11,500 1,900 10,600 7,800 40,500 200 3,400 3,000 1,900 11,500 1,900 10,700 7,900 40,500 200 3,400 3,100 1,900 11,500 1,900 10,700 7,800 40,600 200 3,500 3,100 1,900 11,700 1,900 10,800 7,500 40,300 200 3,300 3,100 1,800 11,600 1,800 10,700 7,800 5.5 0.0 10.0 3.3 -5.3 1.8 0.0 10.3 8.3 4.1 0.0 3.9 -0.8 5.0 -0.4 4.7 11.2 4.0 93,256 67,248 12,527 13,481 10,167 17,754 85,200 61,561 11,441 12,198 9,063 17,760 93,593 69,398 12,188 12,007 9,308 16,471 85,272 63,380 10,323 11,569 9,280 17,108 ... ... ... ... ... ... 3.9 12.1 -7.8 -19.3 -7.6 16.9 4.6 6.2 0.2 0.6 -3.5 10.6 35,848 12,305 4,250 19,293 20,407 12,112 6,773 1,522 20,580 14,545 5,029 1,006 16,744 11,972 940 3,832 29,248 10,719 1,686 16,843 40.3 -22.2 493.7 148.5 16.9 14.4 79.7 -9.0 138 138 152 150 167 163 124 120 116 116 -32.9 -4.1 6.3 10.8 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table. PAGE EIGHT AR I ZO NA 'S EC ONO M Y A R I Z O N A COCHISE-SANTA CRUZ REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses GILA-GRAHAM-GREENLEE REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 54,650 48,850 5,800 10.6 54,175 48,725 5,450 10.1 55,150 49,400 5,750 10.4 55,125 48,675 6,450 11.7 55,450 48,925 6,525 11.8 -3.5 0.9 -27.3 -24.6 -3.5 -3.5 -3.2 -0.1 40,400 100 1,600 2,300 2,300 11,700 1,200 8,200 13,000 40,400 100 1,600 2,300 2,300 11,900 1,100 8,200 12,900 40,400 100 1,600 2,300 2,300 11,900 1,200 8,200 12,800 39,500 100 1,700 2,300 2,300 11,200 1,200 8,500 12,200 39,100 100 1,600 2,300 2,300 11,200 1,200 8,500 11,900 2.6 0.0 -5.9 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 8.2 -0.3 0.0 -6.2 3.7 3.0 1.3 14.6 -3.7 -1.1 71,128 54,796 8,507 7,825 5,901 11,686 64,050 48,270 8,083 7,697 5,718 12,702 70,506 54,426 8,407 7,673 5,948 9,264 67,973 53,872 7,419 6,682 5,360 10,870 ... ... ... ... ... ... 9.9 16.6 -9.8 -10.1 2.9 -14.8 6.0 8.2 -0.3 -2.2 -6.7 -10.7 11,474 5,260 765 5,449 11,691 6,903 2,357 2,431 6,728 5,715 221 792 14,517 7,682 6,782 53 9,422 8,000 60 1,362 -26.9 39.5 -66.7 -80.5 10.4 -16.8 165.4 22.6 64 60 84 78 82 82 83 81 75 75 0.0 0.0 -0.9 -9.6 34,475 31,675 2,800 8.1 34,175 31,700 2,475 7.2 35,225 32,550 2,675 7.6 34,300 31,450 2,850 8.3 34,225 31,500 2,725 8.0 -2.8 -1.2 -18.0 -15.7 -1.1 -1.2 -0.1 0.9 25,200 3,000 2,000 1,900 900 5,700 400 4,000 7,300 25,600 3,000 2,000 1,900 900 5,800 500 4,000 7,500 25,500 3,000 2,100 1,900 800 5,600 500 4,000 7,600 24,700 3,000 2,000 1,900 800 5,900 500 4,000 6,600 24,300 3,000 1,900 1,900 800 5,900 500 4,000 6,400 -0.4 0.0 -5.0 -5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.4 3.2 3.4 3.7 12.8 3.2 7.7 0.6 14.0 4.8 1.6 30,951 21,468 4,992 4,491 3,387 12,557 38,355 28,631 5,427 4,297 3,192 12,252 44,481 34,069 5,823 4,589 3,557 11,057 42,496 33,090 5,350 4,056 3,253 14,514 ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.9 4.8 -1.7 -13.8 -1.3 11.5 4.6 5.6 0.2 2.7 -1.9 31.1 11,758 10,881 308 569 11,785 8,013 3,772 0 4,907 4,397 210 300 7,310 3,102 972 3,236 16,033 5,650 1,882 8,501 115.7 36.2 349.2 196.7 -20.0 11.0 -29.1 -49.9 104 62 84 68 57 38 34 34 50 50 16.3 16.3 5.8 -3.6 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table. ARIZONA'S ECONOMY PAGE NINE A R I Z O N A APACHE-NAVAJO REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses COCONINO-YAVAPAI REGION Civilian Labor Force, ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls, ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Gross Retail Retail Restaurants & Bar Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building Number of Dwelling Units Awarded, F.W. Dodge Total One Family Houses E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 51,550 42,975 8,575 16.6 50,975 43,275 7,700 15.1 52,325 43,900 8,425 16.1 53,075 42,575 10,500 19.8 52,350 42,200 10,150 19.4 -2.1 3.6 -20.2 -18.5 -2.2 -3.3 3.2 5.7 40,800 900 2,000 1,700 2,600 7,100 1,200 8,400 16,900 41,100 900 2,200 1,700 2,600 7,200 1,200 8,400 16,900 41,300 900 2,200 1,800 2,600 7,100 1,200 8,400 17,100 39,600 900 2,200 1,800 2,800 7,300 1,200 8,300 15,100 38,600 900 2,200 1,800 2,700 7,300 1,200 8,300 14,200 4.9 0.0 4.8 5.9 3.8 -3.9 -7.7 -1.2 16.4 0.5 -7.7 21.8 -10.0 2.3 2.1 -6.5 5.2 -2.7 48,423 36,359 4,573 7,491 5,649 5,948 45,923 33,535 4,682 7,706 5,725 5,839 57,740 44,111 5,800 7,829 6,069 8,418 61,183 48,173 6,656 6,354 5,097 8,817 ... ... ... ... ... ... -2.4 5.7 -0.1 -39.1 -30.3 -10.4 -7.6 -8.4 -0.5 -7.5 -11.6 5.6 4,996 2,774 791 1,431 17,205 11,978 597 4,630 19,671 4,042 9,003 6,626 19,251 4,409 3,423 11,419 11,305 4,953 2,380 3,972 -21.8 -49.0 95.1 12.6 4.0 8.8 6.0 -2.7 35 35 137 137 49 47 54 54 53 53 -36.1 -36.1 22.5 22.1 122,050 114,900 7,150 5.9 123,875 117,425 6,450 5.2 125,375 118,375 7,000 5.6 126,700 118,200 8,500 6.7 128,450 120,225 8,225 6.4 0.7 2.1 -15.9 -16.4 0.8 1.1 -3.2 -4.0 93,400 900 5,800 6,500 2,900 24,800 2,700 25,200 24,600 94,100 800 6,200 6,600 2,900 25,500 2,700 26,000 23,400 95,000 800 6,400 6,700 2,900 25,600 2,800 26,200 23,600 93,000 800 6,500 6,500 3,000 26,000 2,700 26,400 21,100 93,600 800 6,400 6,500 3,100 26,300 2,700 26,700 21,100 3.9 -11.1 -3.0 1.6 -3.1 2.7 0.0 5.5 9.3 5.0 -3.7 3.9 7.7 -3.0 3.5 6.6 7.9 3.4 164,281 115,206 31,494 17,581 13,259 34,746 163,261 114,797 31,091 17,373 12,907 35,429 181,664 132,331 31,262 18,071 14,009 39,198 183,257 134,532 33,135 15,590 12,505 40,868 ... ... ... ... ... ... 4.6 9.5 2.6 -21.9 -10.6 -3.3 6.8 7.3 4.8 6.8 2.3 0.4 39,678 23,134 6,393 10,151 41,088 20,997 13,125 6,966 42,296 26,402 6,160 9,734 50,000 25,865 5,320 18,815 65,405 25,261 19,004 21,140 16.6 -20.0 13.6 172.4 -13.3 -9.0 -30.2 -4.8 212 187 190 188 319 226 249 245 240 220 -44.2 13.4 -8.4 7.3 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table. PAGE TEN ARIZONA'S ECONOMY A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C PHOENIX-MESA METROPOLITAN REGION (MARICOPA AND PINAL) Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Durable Nondurable Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Wholesale Retail Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Awards Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Housing Sales and Prices, ARMLS Total Sales ($000s) Total Units Average Price ($) Phoenix Skyharbor International Airport, PSIA Total Passengers Total Aircraft Movements I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 1,479.9 1,436.3 43.6 3.1 1,477.8 1,437.8 40.0 3.0 1,495.8 1,452.4 43.4 3.2 1,505.0 1,459.5 45.5 2.9 1,515.7 1,470.7 45.0 2.8 3.0 4.2 -26.6 -28.2 2.3 2.5 -2.5 -4.9 1,375.3 7.3 92.0 155.0 117.6 37.4 71.7 340.0 85.7 254.3 101.1 427.9 180.3 1,377.3 7.5 93.2 155.6 118.1 37.5 72.1 340.5 85.7 254.8 101.4 427.5 179.5 1,381.6 7.6 95.2 156.5 119.0 37.5 72.2 341.3 86.7 254.6 101.9 427.9 179.0 1,369.2 7.8 96.4 158.5 121.0 37.5 72.6 340.4 87.4 253.0 102.9 429.8 160.8 1,362.3 8.4 97.3 159.8 122.4 37.4 73.0 339.9 86.5 253.4 103.5 427.1 153.3 6.0 25.4 7.3 3.9 5.3 -0.5 5.3 7.1 7.1 7.1 8.9 6.4 1.3 6.3 12.7 5.0 2.0 2.8 -0.2 6.6 5.4 8.2 4.4 9.1 9.0 4.6 2,564,332 1,775,709 321,657 318,427 148,538 462,973 2,448,433 1,683,687 327,530 295,584 141,632 486,513 2,422,577 1,688,584 322,456 275,892 135,645 476,385 2,474,779 1,776,011 315,825 260,148 122,796 545,691 ... ... ... ... ... ... 7.8 10.7 6.8 1.5 -12.2 13.1 6.5 6.1 7.9 5.8 10.5 10.0 624,589 380,798 150,480 93,311 725,100 413,079 131,728 180,293 598,408 388,684 158,533 51,191 799,363 377,567 279,686 142,110 480,864 340,981 106,367 33,516 -13.7 -12.1 4.0 -50.0 5.4 -4.0 16.8 36.0 2,891 2,586 47 258 3,409 2,890 26 493 3,412 2,746 8 658 2,790 2,576 29 185 2,980 2,888 8 84 -11.0 6.4 -78.9 -85.9 -10.1 -6.7 -8.2 -21.5 524,503 3,928 133,529 510,735 3,665 139,355 610,086 4,485 136,028 536,833 3,756 142,927 625,098 4,405 141,906 28.0 15.2 11.1 9.0 0.0 8.7 3,059,241 38,448 2,713,900 35,228 2,538,311 36,232 2,536,618 42,118 ... ... 1.9 25.8 5.7 9.0 PHOENIX-MESA METROPOLITAN REGION (MARICOPA AND PINAL) - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population Natural Increase Births Deaths Net Migration Personal Income by Source ($mil, SAAR) EBR Total Personal Income Earnings by Place of Work Less: Contributions for Social Insurance Plus: Adjustment for Residence Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents Plus: Transfer Payments Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent quarter 4-quarters II 96 III 96 IV 96 I 97 II 97 2,737.3 6.5 11.8 5.3 16.3 2,759.9 6.6 11.9 5.4 16.1 2,782.5 6.7 12.1 5.4 15.8 2,805.1 6.8 12.2 5.4 15.8 2,827.7 6.9 12.3 5.4 15.8 3.3 5.6 4.0 2.1 -3.5 3.3 5.7 4.8 3.7 -0.8 62,946 45,898 2,758 -32 10,340 9,498 22,996 64,397 47,002 2,819 -32 10,579 9,667 23,333 65,791 48,037 2,871 -32 10,820 9,836 23,645 67,184 49,068 2,921 -32 11,063 10,006 23,951 68,599 50,127 2,976 -32 11,304 10,176 24,260 9.0 9.2 7.9 0.4 9.3 7.1 5.5 9.7 10.0 8.7 0.3 9.8 7.5 6.1 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table ARIZONA'S ECONOMY PAGE ELEVEN A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C TUCSON METROPOLITAN REGION (PIMA) Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Durable Nondurable Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Trade Wholesale Retail Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Contracting Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s) F.W. Dodge Total Awards Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Housing Sales and Prices, TAR Total Sales ($000s) Total Units Average Price ($) Tucson International Airport, TAA Total Passengers Total Aircraft Movements I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 379.3 367.7 11.6 3.2 378.3 367.5 10.8 3.2 382.3 370.6 11.7 3.3 381.0 368.2 12.8 3.2 372.8 360.4 12.4 3.1 -2.0 -1.2 -21.0 -18.4 -1.5 -1.5 -2.5 -1.2 317.6 2.4 18.0 29.1 23.3 5.8 13.2 69.3 10.4 58.9 12.7 99.8 73.1 317.5 2.4 18.1 29.2 23.4 5.8 13.4 68.7 10.4 58.3 12.6 100.1 73.0 318.3 2.4 18.2 29.4 23.5 5.9 13.5 68.4 10.4 58.0 12.6 100.5 73.3 311.6 2.3 18.8 29.6 23.7 5.9 13.6 67.9 10.4 57.5 12.5 99.7 67.2 301.2 2.5 19.2 29.5 23.6 5.9 13.4 67.3 10.4 56.9 12.6 99.0 57.7 0.9 4.2 -1.0 2.4 2.6 1.7 0.8 2.7 0.0 3.3 1.6 1.9 -3.0 2.3 2.5 -2.7 3.4 4.0 0.9 -1.4 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.6 6.4 0.5 582,020 387,220 81,805 75,131 37,865 82,905 605,402 407,153 83,298 74,406 40,545 87,738 585,693 392,788 82,008 70,741 40,156 92,425 580,529 404,483 80,321 61,856 33,869 92,050 ... ... ... ... ... ... 7.4 11.6 4.7 -0.4 -13.8 -1.8 4.4 4.1 4.6 3.7 8.4 -2.0 102,301 48,897 23,436 29,968 81,522 51,638 21,953 7,931 76,679 50,076 20,396 6,207 134,579 54,185 75,755 4,639 78,168 46,941 21,096 10,131 -29.6 -18.3 -41.5 -42.0 -16.6 -29.8 26.2 -29.5 438 420 18 0 609 474 18 117 441 412 29 0 562 548 5 9 392 384 1 7 -38.6 -9.6 -87.5 -96.6 -24.6 -2.7 32.6 -90.6 93,406 720 129,730 95,412 762 125,212 98,407 760 129,483 106,778 805 132,643 ... ... ... -4.9 -2.8 -2.2 -3.9 -8.3 5.0 363,357 22,484 315,643 21,421 313,488 21,018 277,970 20,103 280,818 19,012 4.4 3.6 0.5 -4.1 TUCSON METROPOLITAN REGION (PIMA) - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population Natural Increase Births Deaths Net Migration Personal Income by Source ($mil, SAAR) EBR Total Personal Income Earnings by Place of Work Less: Contributions for Social Insurance Plus: Adjustment for Residence Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents Plus: Transfer Payments Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent quarter 4-quarters II 96 III 96 IV 96 I 97 II 97 774.7 1.1 2.8 1.7 3.4 779.0 1.1 2.8 1.7 3.2 783.2 1.1 2.8 1.7 3.1 787.4 1.1 2.9 1.7 3.1 791.6 1.2 2.9 1.7 3.0 2.2 3.6 2.0 0.9 -9.9 2.3 1.1 1.6 2.0 -16.6 15,352 9,661 608 127 3,072 3,100 19,817 15,596 9,826 618 130 3,111 3,147 20,021 15,870 10,015 629 134 3,158 3,192 20,263 16,144 10,202 640 137 3,207 3,238 20,504 16,407 10,381 651 141 3,251 3,284 20,727 6.9 7.5 7.1 11.2 5.8 5.9 4.6 6.3 6.5 6.3 9.7 5.4 6.4 3.9 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table PAGE TWELVE ARIZONA'S ECONOMY A R I Z O N A ARIZONA MONTHLY DATA Civilian Labor Force (000s) ADES Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate, Seas. Adj. (%) Employees on Nonagricultural Payrolls (000s) ADES Total Mining Construction Manufacturing Durable Nondurable Trans., Comm. & Publ. Util. Transportation Trade Wholesale Retail Finance, Ins. & Real Estate Services Government Federal State & Local Schools Hours Worked Per Week, Manufacturing, ADES Average Hourly Earnings ($) ADES Copper Mining Construction Manufacturing Utilities Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Sales ($000s) ADOR Aggregate Retail Sales Retail Food, EBR Restaurants & Bars Gasoline, EBR Gallons (000s) ADOT Utilities Communications Amusements Rentals - Real Property Rentals - Personal Property Contracting Mining - Metal, Oil & Gas Hotel/Motel Value of Construction Contract Awards ($000s Total Awards Residential Building Non-Residential Building Non-Building New Housing Units Authorized, Census C-40 Total Units Single Family Units 2-4 Unit Structures 5-plus Unit Structures Bankruptcy Filings, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Total Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 13 E C O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 2,252.4 2,157.1 95.3 4.8 2,254.5 2,160.3 94.2 4.8 2,284.7 2,182.9 101.8 4.7 2,296.5 2,184.5 112.0 4.4 2,301.5 2,189.2 112.3 4.1 1.3 3.1 -23.6 -28.1 1.2 1.4 -1.3 -2.4 1,973.2 14.7 126.6 202.3 153.4 48.9 99.1 62.0 483.7 106.4 377.3 121.1 590.7 335.0 42.5 292.5 174.5 41.2 1,974.2 14.7 128.3 202.7 154.0 48.7 99.2 62.3 483.1 106.2 376.9 121.4 591.4 333.4 42.8 290.6 172.3 41.6 1,980.2 14.8 131.0 203.8 154.9 48.9 99.7 62.7 483.6 107.1 376.5 122.0 591.0 334.3 43.1 291.2 172.3 41.6 1,952.4 14.9 132.8 205.6 156.5 49.1 100.1 63.1 481.1 107.4 373.7 123.0 593.8 301.1 41.7 259.4 138.3 41.1 1,932.7 15.1 133.7 206.5 157.6 48.9 100.2 63.6 479.1 105.0 374.1 123.8 591.3 283.0 41.1 241.9 119.1 40.5 4.3 2.7 4.9 3.5 4.4 0.6 3.9 7.6 4.4 5.1 4.2 7.1 5.5 1.3 -1.4 1.8 2.3 -4.9 5.1 5.9 4.1 2.3 2.6 1.5 5.1 7.3 4.5 5.9 4.2 6.7 7.4 3.6 -2.6 4.7 7.4 -3.2 17.34 14.15 11.67 18.00 11.47 13.06 18.85 14.22 11.68 18.24 11.48 13.08 18.12 14.68 11.67 17.88 11.33 12.87 18.89 14.58 11.70 17.26 11.43 13.28 15.25 14.46 11.94 16.89 11.45 13.34 -8.0 14.6 2.7 -8.0 7.8 2.1 5.4 8.3 3.4 6.7 6.6 3.0 3,731,872 2,521,192 497,892 465,710 247,078 186,333 329,644 141,724 72,498 272,879 236,871 639,901 136,540 198,565 3,613,753 2,431,700 506,982 438,114 236,957 176,045 318,211 145,665 60,612 324,965 229,745 669,314 121,622 159,176 3,616,146 2,465,947 499,128 417,856 233,214 180,786 371,432 139,954 50,323 275,852 220,069 665,282 134,128 130,294 3,649,094 2,561,594 488,863 391,225 207,412 166,369 436,909 162,921 ... ... ... 741,118 137,769 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7.1 10.6 6.5 0.8 -14.7 -2.3 15.1 23.1 15.1 6.2 6.1 9.3 19.4 10.3 5.7 5.5 6.5 5.0 7.8 3.1 2.8 13.6 36.3 16.1 13.3 8.2 -16.4 9.7 841,732 490,658 189,645 161,429 933,601 531,950 196,888 204,763 801,571 500,683 222,869 78,019 1,054,400 490,446 378,010 185,944 705,150 447,915 156,943 100,292 -10.8 -12.9 -2.2 -13.3 1.8 -6.9 18.1 13.7 3,922 3,507 152 263 4,625 3,910 82 633 4,455 3,715 66 674 3,925 3,645 54 256 3,892 3,777 19 96 -15.9 3.1 -76.5 -89.1 -15.8 -6.8 -19.2 -46.8 2,166 1,660 24 482 2,240 1,770 33 436 2,234 1,766 19 448 2,154 1,699 18 436 ... ... ... ... 30.9 34.9 -30.8 20.8 29.2 28.0 -2.4 35.6 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table. ARIZONA'S ECONOMY P AG E T HI RT EEN A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C ARIZONA - QUARTERLY DATA Demographics & Vital Statistics (000s, seas adj) ADHS & EBR Population Natural Increase Births Deaths Net Migration Personal Income Derivation ($mil, SAAR) EBR Total Personal Income Earnings by Place of Work Less: Contributions for Social Insurance Plus: Adjustment for Residence Plus: Dividends, Interest & Rents Plus: Transfer Payments Components of Earnings ($mil, SAAR) BEA Wages and Salaries Other Labor Income Proprietor’s Income Farm Nonfarm Per Capita Personal Income ($, SAAR) EBR Average Wage Per Employee, Annual Rate ($) E Measures of Financial Institutions Banks and S&Ls Combined ($mil) ASBD Assets Loans Liabilities Deposits Equity Capital Capital:Asset Ratio (%) I N D I C A T O R S II 96 III 96 IV 96 I 97 II 97 4,413.4 9.7 18.4 8.8 23.6 4,446.6 9.7 18.6 8.8 23.5 4,479.6 9.6 18.5 8.9 23.2 4,512.3 9.7 18.7 9.0 22.9 4,544.5 9.8 18.8 9.0 22.1 3.0 1.4 2.1 2.7 -6.5 3.0 3.1 1.2 -0.8 -4.0 92,401 64,279 4,437 294 15,839 16,425 94,278 65,668 4,522 299 16,171 16,662 96,038 66,968 4,601 304 16,462 16,906 98,154 68,469 4,704 308 16,749 17,333 99,966 69,975 4,797 313 16,922 17,552 8.2 8.9 8.1 6.4 6.8 6.9 8.0 8.7 7.8 6.4 5.8 7.3 52,317 6,035 5,858 379 5,479 20,936 27,341 53,382 6,130 6,008 465 5,543 21,202 27,373 53,733 6,129 6,021 364 5,657 21,439 27,276 54,485 6,112 6,109 328 5,781 21,753 27,426 ... ... ... ... ... 21,997 ... 5.6 1.3 7.2 4.8 7.3 5.1 0.8 8.2 4.3 6.5 2.5 6.8 4.8 2.8 39,810 24,161 36,140 32,512 3,670 10.1 31,064 21,266 28,558 25,909 2,506 8.9 32,145 22,699 29,791 27,252 2,354 8.1 24,226 15,812 22,528 20,340 1,698 7.8 24,230 16,419 22,470 20,637 1,760 8.2 -39.1 -32.0 -37.8 -36.5 -52.0 NA -27.6 -18.5 -27.1 -26.7 -33.3 NA MEASURES OF INFLATION AND PRICES Consumer Price Index (1982-84=100) ASU & BLS Metropolitan Phoenix Western Region (U.S.) U.S. - All Urban Consumers U.S. - Urban Wage Earners Price Indexes (1992=100) BEA Gross Domestic Product Personal Consumption Expenditures Sources and abbreviations: ADES: Arizona Department of Economic Security ADHS: Arizona Department of Health Services ADOR: Arizona Department of Revenue ADOT: Arizona Department of Transportation ARMLS: Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service ASBD: Arizona State Banking Department ASPB: Arizona State Parks Board ASU: Arizona State University, College of Business, Research Centers PAGE FOURTEEN % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent quarter 4-quarters II 96 III 96 IV 96 I 97 II 97 168.4 157.5 156.5 153.9 167.6 158.6 157.4 154.6 168.6 158.7 158.5 155.8 171.3 160.8 159.6 156.7 173.9 161.0 160.2 157.3 3.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 4.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 109.6 109.8 110.2 110.2 110.7 111.0 111.4 111.6 111.9 111.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 MEASURES OF INFLATION AND PRICES - MONTHLY DATA Consumer Price Index (1982-1984=100) BLS U.S. - All Urban U.S. - Wage Earners % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent quarter 4-quarters MAR 97 APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 160.0 157.0 160.2 157.2 160.1 157.2 160.3 157.4 160.5 157.5 BEA: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor Census C-40, Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce EBR: Economic & Business Research Program, The University of Arizona F.W. Dodge, Division of McGraw Hill Information Systems Co. (proprietary data provided by special permission) NPS: National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months 2.2 2.1 2.8 2.7 NSCCC: Nogales-Santa Cruz Chamber of Commerce PSIA: Phoenix Skyharbor International Airport SAAR: Seasonally adjusted at annual rates TAA: Tucson Airport Authority TAR: Tucson Association of Realtors USINS: U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona USCS: U.S. Customs Service, U.S. Department of the Treasury ARIZONA'S ECONOMY A R I Z O N A E C O N O M I C MAR 97 I N D I C A T O R S APR 97 MAY 97 JUN 97 JUL 97 % change versus year ago for: most most recent recent month 12-months TRAVEL AND TOURISM Visits to Parks & Other Recreational Areas, ADOT, NPS & ASPB Northern Arizona Historical Scenic Water Based Recreation Southern Arizona Historical Scenic Water Based Recreation 1,561,051 208,133 512,435 840,483 468,240 96,671 312,311 59,258 1,800,648 193,193 480,997 1,126,458 297,306 56,709 197,805 42,792 2,131,384 201,673 687,273 1,242,438 254,428 44,183 157,589 52,656 2,221,820 203,491 790,583 1,227,746 178,922 28,426 106,141 44,355 2,677,087 211,370 998,558 1,467,159 167,243 26,978 93,969 46,296 -4.2 -0.0 3.0 -9.0 -5.7 -35.6 7.0 -2.8 -5.1 -1.1 -3.6 -6.5 0.3 -1.3 0.7 0.4 International Border Crossings, USINS & USCS U.S. Citizens Aliens 775,392 2,074,294 685,276 1,826,179 614,941 1,551,744 722,656 1,873,859 717,859 1,874,132 22.1 21.0 3.7 -5.9 See notes at bottom of Arizona - Quarterly table. TO ORDER Check the appropriate box below and include a check or money order, where applicable. Arizona’s Economy ❑ free of charge in the United States ❑ $12.00 (U.S.) international subscription Arizona Economic Indicators ❑ $17.00 in the U.S., Fall 1997 and Spring 1998 ❑ $23.00 (U.S.) international subscription, Fall 1997 and Spring 1998 1990 Arizona Statistical Abstract, includes 1980 Census data. ❑ Quantity ordered:_______ $26.50 (includes $3 shipping and handling) ❑ Quantity ordered:_______ $30.00 (U.S.) international order 1993 Arizona Statistical Abstract, includes 1990 Census data. ❑ Quantity ordered:_______ $27.95 (includes $3 shipping and handling) ❑ Quantity ordered:_______ $36.00 (U.S.) international order ARIZONA'S ECONOMY IS PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE KARL ELLER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON, ARIZONA 85721. 520-621-2155. COPYRIGHT 1997 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA. Name: _______________________________________________________________________________________ REQUESTS FOR COPIES, PERMISSION TO REPRINT AND CHANGE OF ADDRESS NOTICES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE STAFF. Organization: ___________________________________________Title: __________________________________ DEAN ...............................................................MARK ZUPAN Address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATE DEAN OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS...................................LISA FAHEY City: ________________________________State: _____________________________Zip: ___________________ Country: _____________________________Telephone: ( ) _________________________________________ PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR...............................DIANA HUNTER Total amount enclosed: $ _______________________________ ❑ Address Change. Please fill in old address in shaded box. Please make check or money order payable to: Economic and Business Research Program Mail to: Publications Office College of Business and Public Administration McClelland Hall 204 PO Box 210108 The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721-0108 9/97 Name: ______________________________________________ Organization: ________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________ City: ______________________________________________ State: ________________________ Zip: ________________ Telephone: __________________________________________ NOTE: The publication date of Arizona’s Economy is in transition from the middle month of each quarter to the first month of each quarter. To accomplish this change, we follow the this September issue in January, 1998, and every three months thereafter – April, July and October, 1998. AR IZ ON A 'S ECON O MY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS RESEARCH PROGRAMS 520-621-2155 ECONOMIC IMPACT & FISCAL ANALYSIS....................ALBERTA CHARNEY 621-2291 FORECASTING PROJECT .................MARSHALL J. VEST 621-4075 FREE TRADE STUDIES ......................ARTHUR L. SILVERS 621-4822 STATE DATA CENTER ...........................PIA MONTOYA 621-2523 DATA REFERENCE..................................VALORIE RICE 621-2109 PAGE FIFTEEN