PG TD0310 Contract No. T08-49-0001 Task Assignment MPD 33-09 September 2010 Executive Summary 2010 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Long Range Transportation Plan Prepared for: Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. September 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 1.1 2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................. ES-1 Long Range Planning Process ...................................................................... ES-1 Implementation Plan ...................................................................................... ES-4 2.1 Roads ....................................................................................................... ES-4 2.2 Non-Motorized Trail System....................................................................... ES-10 2.3 Public Transit ........................................................................................... ES-10 2.4 Transportation Funding ............................................................................. ES-13 3.0 Policies and Guidelines ................................................................................ ES-13 3.1 Typical Road Cross Sections ...................................................................... ES-13 3.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines .............................................................. ES-13 3.3 Access Management................................................................................. ES-14 List of Figures Figure ES-1 Figure ES-2 Figure ES-3 Road Improvement Needs .................................................................... ES-5 Recommended Non-Motorized Trail System .......................................... ES-11 Recommended Public Transit System .................................................... ES-12 List of Tables Table ES-1 Road Improvement Needs .................................................................... ES-6 CD-ROM (Back Cover) 2010 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Long Range Transportation Plan i ii 1.0 Introduction The Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC, Community) 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a multimodal transportation plan covering the period through 2030. The LRTP identifies needed road improvements to accommodate Community growth and quality of life goals, road preservation and reconstruction, public transit, and non-motorized paths and trails. The SRPMIC is a sovereign tribe located on the east side of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is bordered by the cities of Mesa and Tempe to the south, Scottsdale to the west and north, the town of Fountain Hills and the Fort McDowell Indian Reservation to the north, and unincorporated Maricopa County and Tonto National Forest to the east. The Community is a member of the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), the municipal and intergovernmental planning organization for Maricopa County and the metropolitan Phoenix area. The Community is comprised of two Native American tribes with two distinct backgrounds and cultures: the Pima, "Akimel O'Odham" (River People) and the Maricopa, "Xalychidom Piipaash" (people who live toward the water). Although these tribes are distinct, the Community is considered in its entirety by this long range transportation plan. This is a summary of the recommendations of the SRPMIC 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. For a more detailed discussion of the plan elements and the planning process, please refer to the complete plan document found in the attached CD-ROM. This plan was prepared with funding from the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Multimodal Planning Division’s Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) program. The recommendations of this plan are subject to the review and approval of the SRPMIC Tribal Council. 1.1 Long Range Planning Process This LRTP responds to federal transportation planning requirements for tribal communities; it evaluates existing and future transportation conditions using transportation performance measures; its recommendations incorporate broad-based Community and agency involvement. Indian Reservation Roads Program The Indian Reservation Roads (IRR) Program, which is administered by the Federal Highway Administration’s Federal Lands Highway Office and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), requires a LRTP to demonstrate the Community’s transportation needs and the strategies to meet these needs. This 2010 LRTP fulfills these requirements and updates the previous plan completed in 2001. Technical Advisory Committee The Technical Advisory Committee met five times over the 18-month study process and provided important guidance in the development of the 2010 LRTP. The committee membership included representatives from several SRPMIC departments, ADOT, the BIA, City of Scottsdale, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) and the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT): Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-1 SRPMIC Nicole Charlie – Administration Suzanne Colver – Community Development Department Kirk Beaty – Engineering & Construction Services Jennifer Jack – Engineering and Construction Services (Project Manager) Phil Matthews – Engineering & Construction Services ADOT Julian Avila – Communications & Community Partnerships Tish Hunter – Environmental Planning Group Misty Dayzie – Multimodal Planning Division (Project Manager) Robert Samour – Phoenix Construction District Office Tim Wolfe – Phoenix Maintenance District Office BIA Bob Maxwell – Western Regional Office City of Scottsdale Teresa Huish –Transportation Department MAG Bob Hazlett – Transportation Engineering MCDOT Tim Oliver – Systems Planning Mitch Wagner – Systems Planning Community Outreach Two rounds of Community outreach were conducted for this long range transportation planning effort. The first round focused on issue identification and data collection. The second round provided Community members with an overview of the plan recommendations. The study team attended Elders’ Breakfasts, conducted Community Workshops and made presentations to the SRPMIC Tribal Council. Community outreach also included attending the Young River People’s Council, district meetings, and Community events such as Earth Day and Safety Day. The study team identified six main transportation issues based on input from this outreach effort: • • Growth: The new Salt River Fields spring training facility, the Talking Stick Resort, Casino Arizona and projected commercial employment in the Pima Freeway (Loop 101) corridor combined with regional population growth will add more traffic to SRPMIC roads. Cut-Through Traffic: The growing number of non-Community drivers finding shortcuts across Community land to avoid growing congestion on the regional freeway and arterial system was Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-2 • • • • a big concern for stakeholders. Traffic Safety: Concerns included speeding on Community roads, pedestrian and bicycle safety, crashes at Pima Freeway traffic interchanges, and safety on State Route 87 (Beeline Highway). Salt River Bridge Crossings: Divided by the Salt River, several new bridge crossings are identified to serve both regional and local traffic. MCDOT is planning new bridges at Dobson Road, McKellips Road and Gilbert Road. Some Community stakeholders want a new riverbed crossing for local traffic at Horne Road. Public Transit: Community members and the Salt River Transit System expressed a need for additional service with better connectivity to the regional transit system for access to health care facilities, shopping, work and other activities. Bicycle and Pedestrian Route: Stakeholders expressed a desire for sidewalks and trails to improve pedestrian safety and mobility; however there was little support for connecting pathways to areas outside of the Community. Existing Transportation System Conditions To establish a baseline to identify improvement needs, the study team reviewed existing transportation systems conditions by collecting data on road characteristics, traffic conditions, public transit service and non-motorized transportation. A traffic intersection model using SYNCHRO transportation analysis software was prepared to evaluate existing level of service at key intersection locations in the Pima Freeway corridor. The study team also reviewed crash history information from both the SRPMIC Police Department and ADOT. The LRTP recommendations include improvements to address operational and safety deficiencies. Land Use and Socioeconomic Conditions The study team reviewed Census 2000 data to identify protected populations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice. The data showed that the SRPMIC population has higher than average concentrations of minorities, people living in a low-income household, elderly people age 65 and older, disabled, and female heads of households. Population and employment projections for year 2030 were used with the City of Scottsdale Travel Demand Model (STDM) to estimate future travel demand. The study team reviewed existing and planned land use and compiled population and employment projections for the Community and surrounding areas to prepare the socioeconomic data needed by the travel demand model. In 2009, the estimated SRPMIC population was 7,188; and, estimated employment was 12,600. In 2030, the projected SRPMIC population is 8,900; and, projected employment is 50,399. Future Transportation System Conditions Using the 2030 traffic forecasts from the STDM, the study team evaluated traffic operations at key traffic intersection locations and on SRPMIC road segments. The analysis included the effects of possible traffic calming measures to reduce cut-through traffic. Potential traffic operations deficiencies were noted at several Pima Freeway traffic interchanges and on State Route 87 (Beeline Highway). While both the Pima Freeway and the Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202) will be built to their ultimate cross section of eight general purpose lanes and two High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, operations analysis suggests that additional capacity will be needed to accommodate 2030 traffic at an acceptable level of service. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-3 The planned new Dobson Road crossing of the Salt River will increase traffic on the two-lane section of 92nd Street between McKellips Road and McDowell Road. To maintain efficient access to Casino Arizona improvement of this section of 92nd Street to four lanes is needed concurrent with the construction of the planned Salt River bridge. This new bridge crossing is anticipated in the 2020 to 2030 horizon. The Salt River Transit System will need to expand to meet the demand for public transit service within the Community. As much as 60 percent of the Community population would be considered transit dependent based on the socioeconomic characteristics of the Community. Continued funding for transit operations is the greatest challenge to meeting transit demand both now and in the future. Today, there are few paved or un-paved trails within the SRPMIC. The rural character of the Community, characterized by its narrow roads with no curb or gutter, requires pedestrians to walk along the edge of pavement and in some cases where obstructions or canal laterals exist, pedestrians have to walk on the pavement. A system of connected paths and trails is needed to improve pedestrian safety and encourage walking for health. 2.0 Implementation Plan The 2010 SRPMIC LRTP implementation plan identifies needed road improvements to accommodate Community growth and quality of life goals, road preservation and reconstruction, public transit, and non-motorized paths and trails. Descriptions of all of the SRPMIC priority projects in the implementation plan can be found in the LRTP final report. 2.1 Roads This LRTP addresses two types of road improvements for the Community: system capacity and road preservation and reconstruction. System improvements include traffic calming measures to minimize cutthrough traffic and capacity and mobility improvements in the Pima Freeway corridor to encourage commercial development. Road preservation and reconstruction needs include pavement preservation, road reconstruction and paving gravel roads. Figure ES-1 shows the 2030 road improvements identified in the SRPMIC priority project list. Table ES-1 describes the type and estimated cost for each SRPMIC road improvement priority. The SRPMIC priority project list also includes the use of IRR funds for routine road maintenance and transportation planning as need arises. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-4 Mesa Drive Center Street Country Club Drive Extension Road Alma School Road Longmore Road Dobson Road 92nd Street Pima Road 37 Via de Ventura Arizona Canal VER T RI SAL AREA OF INSET 34 ARIZONA 23 al Can 87 SRPMIC Boundary 53 CAP ARIZONA 101 Indian Bend Road 7 8 32 Multi-family Subdivision 3 16 25 44 Chaparral Road Camelback Road 43 46 12 Indian School Road 42 Osborn Road 19 15 55 Thomas Road McDowell Road McKellips Road 29 30 48 ARIZONA 87 SALT RIVER 14 1 33 Total 2030 lanes 2-lanes 40 26 27 22 57 50 49 Section 12 35 52 10 9 36 Curry Road* 18 45 39 56 17 13 24 Oak Street Country Club Subdivision Center Street Arizona Canal Subdivision 31 11 41 28 20 21 51 SALT RIVER Gilbert Road 54 2 5 4 6 Stapley Drive McDonald Drive See Inset 38 ARIZONA 202 47 6-lanes 10-lanes 4-lanes 8-lanes (none projected) x Priority. see Table ES-1 Improvements Movement Community Intersection Restriction Gateway Improvements Potential new local streets Road preservation and reconstruction need Roadway capacity improvement by planning horizon Near-term Mid-term Long-term *Curry Road alignment subject to Section 12 Master Plan Study No scale Source: HDR Engineering, Inc., September 2010 FIGURE ES-1 | Road Improvement Needs 2010 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Long Range Transportation Plan ES-5 Table ES-1 SRPMIC Priority Road Improvement Priorities Roadway Description 1 Oak Street: Horne Road to Gilbert Reconstruction Road 2 Pima Road: McDowell Road to Via Widen to 4 lanes de Ventura 3 Jackrabbit Road: Alma School Road to Beverly Street 4 5 McDonald Drive: Alma School Road to Mesa Drive McDonald Drive: Mesa Drive to Olive Street Mesa Drive: Chaparral Road to McDonald Drive Mesa Drive: McDonald Drive to Indian Bend Road Reconstruction Route Owner Cost Estimate (Thousands) SRPMIC $3,200 SRPMIC/ COS $70,400 SRPMIC $200 SRPMIC $4,000 SRPMIC $600 SRPMIC $2,000 SRPMIC $2,000 SRPMIC $200 BIA $1,400 New construction New construction 6 Alma School Road: Arizona Canal New construction to McDonald Drive 7 Dobson Road: Arizona Canal to Indian Bend Road 8 Center Street: McDonald to Indian New construction Bend Road SRPMIC $2,000 9 Virginia Drive: Westwood Street to Extension Road SRPMIC $400 Victory Acres1: Grand Street BIA $60 Victory Acres1: Glenrosa Drive BIA $60 Victory Acres1: McDonald Drive BIA $60 Victory Acres1: Monterosa Drive BIA $30 SRPMIC $10 BIA $600 BIA $400 BIA $200 10 11 New construction Reconstruction Overlay Dobson Heights: Pinchot Drive Surface reseal Montecito Avenue: Longmore Road to Standage 12 Montecito Avenue: Standage to Alma School Road New construction Montecito Avenue: Alma School Road to Beverly Road Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-6 Table ES-1 SRPMIC Priority Road Improvement Priorities (continued) Roadway Description Route Owner Cost Estimate (Thousands) 13 Extension Road: McDowell Road to Indian School Road Reconstruction BIA $4,000 14 Harris Road: McDowell Road to Thomas Road Reconstruction BIA $2,000 15 Dobson Road: McDowell Road to Camelback Road Pavement rehabilitation BIA $1,250 16 Multi-family Village Roads New local residential streets SRPMIC - 17 Country Club Subdivision Roads New local residential streets SRPMIC - 18 Center Street Subdivision Roads New local residential streets SRPMIC - 19 Longmore Road: Osborn Road to Indian School Road Pavement rehabilitation/ reconstruction BIA $250 BIA $250 BIA $250 20 21 Extension Road: Indian School Road to Camelback Road Extension Road: Camelback Road to Chaparral Road Pavement rehabilitation Longmore Road: Indian School Road to Chaparral Road Overlay BIA $300 22 92nd Street: McKellips Road to McDowell Road Pavement rehabilitation BIA $1,050 23 Spring Training Facility Roads Widen to 4 lanes SRPMIC - 24 Longmore Road: Palm Lane to Thomas Road Pavement rehabilitation/ reconstruction BIA $450 BIA $500 BIA $250 BIA $250 BIA $400 Chaparral Road: Dobson Road to Alma School Road 25 Chaparral Road: Alma School Road to Extension Road Pavement rehabilitation Chaparral Road: Extension Road to Country Club Drive 26 Longmore Road: McKellips Road to McDowell Road Pavement rehabilitation Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-7 Table ES-1 Road Improvement Priorities (continued) SRPMIC Priority Roadway Route Owner Cost Estimate (Thousands) 27 Dobson Road: McKellips Road to McDowell Road Reconstruction BIA $2,000 28 Country Club Drive: Highland Avenue to Chaparral Road Pavement rehabilitation BIA $150 29 Mesa Drive: SR 87 to Camelback Road Pavement rehabilitation SRPMIC $650 30 Osborn Road: Country Club Drive to Mesa Drive Pavement rehabilitation BIA $500 31 Country Club Drive: Oak Street to Indian School Road Pavement rehabilitation BIA $750 32 Alma School Road: Arizona Canal bridge Bridge replacement/ rehabilitation SRPMIC $650 33 Traffic calming measures at various locations Entry treatments and traffic channelization SRPMIC - 34 Longmore Road: Talking Stick to Via de Ventura New 2-lanes road SRPMIC $1,000 35 Curry Road Extension: McClintock New 4-lane road Road to McKellips Road SRPMIC $4,800 36 Section 12 Infrastructure Roads New commercial streets SRPMIC - 37 Dobson Road: Via de Ventura to 90th Street New 3-lane road SRPMIC $3,750 38 Dobson Road: Arizona Canal Bridge New 4-lane canal crossing SRPMIC $682 39 92nd Street and McDowell Road Intersection Improvements Remove offset and align 92nd Street SRPMIC/MCDOT $500 40 92nd Street: McKellips Road to McDowell Road Widen to 4 lanes SRPMIC $4,000 41 92nd Street: McDowell Road to Indian School Road Widen to 3 lanes SRPMIC $6,000 42 Indian School Road: Pima Freeway to Dobson Road Widen to 3 lanes SRPMIC $2,400 43 Dobson Road: Indian School Road to McDonald Drive Widen to 3 lanes SRPMIC $6,000 Description Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-8 Table ES-1 SRPMIC Priority Road Improvement Needs (continued) Roadway Description Route Owner Cost Estimate (Thousands) SRPMIC/MCDOT $2,000 SRPMIC $600 44 Chaparral Road: 92nd Street to Dobson Road Widen to 4 lanes 45 Lehi Crossing New Salt River crossing 46 Pima Freeway: Red Mountain Freeway to Shea Blvd New general purpose lanes ADOT $97,400 47 Red Mountain Freeway: Pima Freeway to Gilbert Road New general purpose lanes ADOT $60,300 48 Gilbert Road: Thomas Road to SR 87 (Beeline Highway) 6-lane bridge MCDOT $40,910 49 McKellips Road: Pima Freeway to Alma School Road Widen to 6 lanes MCDOT $14,750 50 McKellips Road: Alma School Road to Red Mountain Freeway New 6-lane bridge MCDOT $24,725 51 Dobson Road: Red Mountain Freeway to McKellips Road New 4-lane bridge MCDOT $47,700 52 SR 87: Red Mountain Freeway to Shea Boulevard Widen to 6 lanes ADOT $24,000 53 Pima Freeway and Pima Road/90th Street Traffic Interchange Additional through and turn lanes ADOT - 54 Pima Freeway and McDonald Drive Traffic Interchange Additional through and turn lanes ADOT - 55 Pima Freeway and Thomas Road Traffic Interchange Additional through and turn lanes ADOT - 56 Pima Freeway and McDowell Road Traffic Interchange Additional through and turn lanes ADOT - 57 Pima Freeway and McKellips Road Traffic Interchange Additional through and turn lanes ADOT - Source: HDR Engineering, Inc., September 2010. Notes: ‘-‘ more study needed to estimate improvement cost. Pavement reconstruction includes pavement removal, grading, drainage, asphalt surfacing, pavement striping and marking. Pavement overlay includes 2” overlay, pavement striping and marking. Pavement rehabilitation includes 2” mill and replacement, pavement striping and marking. New construction includes grading, drainage, asphalt surfacing, pavement striping and marking. Surface reseal is applying sealant to asphalt surfaces. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-9 2.2 Non-Motorized Trail System The recommended Community trails system links schools, subdivisions and other destinations important to Community members. This system will not be built overnight; rather, these recommendations lay out a framework for developing a system over time. Implementation of the trails plan will provide dedicated routes for pedestrians, bicyclists, and horseback riders to connect safely between activity centers. Figure ES-2 shows the recommended trail system for the Community as well as a plan for developing the system in multiple phases. During the public outreach, the study team heard from several different voices that the Community prefers not to provide trails linkages to the greater metropolitan area. The trails plan reflects the Community’s desire to have a system of non-motorized routes to access Community destinations and residential areas. The trails system is not an extension of the regional trails system; the paths/trails are intended to provide circulation within the Community itself. 2.3 Public Transit There is a large unmet demand for transit services within the Community. Even with the modest population increase expected over the next twenty years, demand for transit services is expected to increase almost 50 percent over that period. The public feedback the study team received regarding transit services was generally positive. Comments largely related to the desire for expanded hours of operation and increased frequency of service. The current demand-responsive service is convenient to users, but the zoned system, infrequent service, and lack of adequate wait-room facilities at the transit center makes transferring between zones difficult. In response to this desire for improved service, the LRTP recommends two Community circulator routes; one referred to as the Pima/Dobson Area Community Circulator and the other as the People’s Village/Lehi Community Circulator. Figure ES-3 shows the recommended public transit system. The Pima/Dobson Area Community Circulator could be partially funded by the businesses in the corridor. The route would serve developing and established Pima Freeway corridor locations such as the Pima Center, the Pavilions and other regional shopping, the Salt River Fields at Talking Stick, and Talking Stick golf, casino and conference facilities. The People’s Village/Lehi Community Circulator would provide service for the residential developments of these areas. The circulators would have connections to each other and to the demand-response service at the Two Waters Government Complex. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-10 al Can Center Street Country Club Drive Extension Road Alma School Road Longmore Road Dobson Road 92nd Street Pima Road Mesa Drive 87 SRPMIC Boundary CAP ARIZONA Arizona Canal VER T RI SAL AREA OF INSET Via de Ventura ARIZONA Talking Stick Golf Club 101 " ) Casino Arizona Pavilions dM ou nta i Scottsdale Community " ) College nT rai l " ) Walmart Canalside " ) Camelback Road Victory Acres 1 Victory Acres 2 Salt River Trail Osborn Road Dobson Hts Thomas Road Oak Street McDowell Road Riparian Corridor Trail - South " ) Two Waters " ) Saddleback Communications Casino Arizona McKellips Road " ) Rec Complex " ) Canal " ) " ) Indian School Road Arizon a Gilbert Road Chaparral Road Re Stapley Drive McDonald Drive See Inset " ) " ) Indian Bend Road PHASE II ARIZONA 87 SALT RIVER I Lehi Trail JR’s " ) I EI Lehi PD " ) S A PH " ) Lehi Ctr Planned " Park and Ride ARIZONA 202 " ) Section 12 Planned Development ASE Curry Road PH SALT RIVER I " ) Existing Trails/ Paths Destinations Riverview " ) Proposed Trails Phase I Phase II Phase III Va Shly’ay Akimel Restoration Project (PHASE) Mesa Trails Scottsdale Trails No scale Source: HDR Engineering, Inc., September 2010. FIGURE ES-2 | Recommended Non-Motorized Trail System 2010 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Long Range Transportation Plan ES-11 Mesa Drive Center Street Country Club Drive Extension Road Alma School Road Longmore Road Dobson Road 92nd Street Pima Road Hayden Road Scottsdale Road Via de Ventura SRPMIC Boundary Talking Stick Golf Club " ) Casino Arizona Pavilions Indian Bend Road " ) " ) x Æ 101 McDonald Drive 92nd St. Future Community Circulator Route Areas Chaparral Road Scottsdale Community " ) College Ari zon aC 50 76 84 511 " ) ana l Canalside Walmart Victory Acres 1 " ) " ) " ) Indian School Road Victory Acres 2 Osborn Road Scottsdale Healthcare 87 Æ x " ) Camelback Road Dobson Hts 511 " ) Thomas Road " ) M/P Admin Lehi PD " ) Oak Street Grocery Store Rec Complex McDowell Road " ) JR's " ) " ) Planned Park and Ride " 535 536 " ) " ) Saddleback Communications Casino Arizona McKellips Road Lehi Ctr " ) 532 x Æ 202 Curry Road Transit Service Area Extends South to Baseline Road Recommended Demand Response Transit Service Riverview " ) o Service Area Boundary Rte 3 - North Scottsdale Rte 4 - East Mesa Rte 5 - West Mesa 0 0.5 1 " ) Activity Center 511 Valley Metro Transit Route # Potential Community Circulator Service Area Rte 1 - South Scottsdale 2 Miles Sources: SRPMIC, Valley Metro, HDR Engineering, Inc., December 2009. Source: Source: HDR HDR Engineering, Engineering, Inc., Inc., September March 28, 2010. FIGURE ES-3 FIGURE | Recommended 1 | Improvement Public andTransit Phasing System Plan 2010 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Transportation Long Range Transportation Planning Study Plan xx ES-12 2.4 Transportation Funding Federal, state, regional and Community funds are available for the construction, operation and maintenance of the SRPMIC transportation system. The recommendations in this 2010 LRTP position the Community to take advantage of both existing sources as well as new sources as they may come available. Road Revenue Sources In addition to Community funding and development fees, other road transportation sources include the IRR Program, the Regional Transportation Plan administered by MAG and federal funding administered by ADOT. Transit Revenue Sources Tribal transit funds are available from several federal agencies including the U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. A partnership with businesses in the Pima Freeway corridor is another potential transit funding source. Non-motorized Revenue Sources In addition to Community funding, Transportation Enhancement funds and Safe Routes to School funds are possible sources for seed money to start implementing the recommended path and trail system between Community activity centers. 3.0 Policies and Guidelines The LRTP includes policies and guidelines needed to help implement the recommendations of this transportation plan. 3.1 Typical Road Cross Sections In addition to updated Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification for Community roads, the LRTP also identifies typical road cross sections that include sidewalks and multi-use trails to support the recommended path and trail system. Urban-style cross sections with curb and gutter are included to support planned commercial development in Section 12 and the Pima Freeway corridor. 3.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines SRPMIC anticipates that employment in the Pima Freeway corridor will increase to more than 50,000 by year 2030. As new projects come forward, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is an important tool in the overall development planning process that identifies the existing, short-term and long term impacts on the road system. The LRTP identifies guidelines for preparing a TIA, recommending that all new developments that generate 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips be required to complete the analysis. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-13 3.3 Access Management Access management is the systematic control, location, spacing, design, and operation of driveways and street connections, medians, median openings, turn lanes, traffic signals, and interchanges. The purpose is to provide (or improve upon the existing) access to land development while at the same time preserving the constant flow of traffic on surrounding roads, keeping crucial factors such as speed, safety and capacity needs in mind For SRPMIC, implementing robust access management policies of its own should be an important part of the Community’s strategy for reducing cut-through commuter traffic. Access management for peripheral roads should go hand-in-glove with the proposed interior traffic calming measures. Protecting high capacity corridors like McKellips Road, McDowell Road, Pima Road, 92nd Street and Dobson Road will maintain higher travel speeds, reducing the likelihood that a shortcut through the Community will be faster for commuters. The LRTP identifies access management areas where developers will be required to help maintain the balance between land development plans and the functional integrity of the roads serving the area. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan ES-14