MARICOPA COUNTY
RISK MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2011-12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

II.

CLAIMS DIVISION

III.

SAFETY DIVISION

IV.

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

V.

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION

VI.

STATISTICS AND COVERAGE

RISK MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Presented herein is the Maricopa County Risk Management Annual Report for the fiscal year
July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012.
This report contains summaries of the fiscal year’s losses and costs for Maricopa County’s (County)
auto liability, auto physical damage, general liability, medical malpractice, property damage,
workers’ compensation, professional liability, environmental liability, environmental property
damage and unemployment exposures. This report, along with ongoing quarterly reports to County
departments during the year, are intended to assist departments in recognizing the nature and extent
of their losses to implement and improve their loss control and prevention programs.
Structure and Mission
As of June 30, 2012, the Risk Management Department (Department) completed its 31st year
administering the County’s self-insurance program. Risk Management’s mission is to provide
claims management, safety and loss control consultations and training, environmental consultations
and insurance coverage services to Maricopa County departments, districts, and Trust members so
they can reduce or eliminate loss. The vision is to be recognized as a leader in Risk Management,
and relied upon for a County-wide risk management philosophy and culture. Risk Management’s
primary activities are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Risk consulting
Insurance procurement above self-insured retention levels
Maricopa County Self-Insured Risk Trust Fund management and financing
Administration and monitoring of third party administrators adjusting
workers’ compensation and unemployment claims
Investigation and disposition of casualty and property claims and lawsuits
Safety training, reporting, and compliance
Loss control programs
Environmental investigation, remediation, and reporting
Contractual indemnification and insurance requirement language standards and review.

The Department is divided into four operating divisions: Claims, Safety, Environmental, and
Administration. Highlights for each division are included herein. The Department strives to
accomplish its mission with assistance and direction from the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors, the Maricopa County Self-Insured Risk Trust Fund Board of Trustees, and the County
Manager. The Director of Risk Management reports to the County Manager.

I-1

Self-Insured Trust Fund
Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) § 11-981 authorizes the County to self-insure, or procure insurance
from any insurer authorized by the State of Arizona Department of Insurance, or both. Insurance
(defined in Title 20 ARS) includes, but is not limited to; auto liability, auto physical damage,
general liability, medical malpractice, property, workers’ compensation, professional liability,
environmental liability, environmental property damage and unemployment insurance.
Upon establishment of the self-insurance program, the County is required to designate a Risk Trust
Administrator (Director, Risk Management), and establish a trust. The Risk Trust is funded by an
allocation of funds from General Fund and Non-General Fund departments and Special Districts, or
such other funding techniques permitted by State statute and authorized by the Risk Trust’s Board
of Trustees.
A Board of Trustees assists Risk Management to coordinate the Risk Trust’s activities and affairs.
Trustees, United States citizens and residents of Maricopa County, are appointed by the Maricopa
County Board of Supervisors (BOS) and the County Manager. During Fiscal Year FY11-12, the
following individuals were members of the Board of Trustees:
Trustee District/Appointment

Trustee

BOS District One
BOS District Two
BOS District Three
BOS District Four
BOS District Five
BOS Chairman
County Manager

Les Clark
Joel Sterrett, Chair
Thomas Katsenes
Steven Beeghley
Rey Valenzuela
BOS Chairman
Shelby Scharbach
FY11-12 Results

During the three year period of FY09-10 through FY11-12, the Risk Trust’s assets decreased
$12,323,650, or 19.52% from $63,134,669 to $50,811,019. During the same period, the Trust’s
liabilities increased $38,691,034, or 42.10%, from $91,891,866 to $130,582,900. The deficit in Risk
Trust net assets is a result of a spend down of the Risk Trust fund in fiscal years when user
departments were only charged for administrative costs even though claims and insurance continued
to be paid by Risk Management on behalf of user departments.
Maricopa County’s population approximates 3.8 million. It is the 4th most populous County in the
United States. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than half of the state’s population
resides in Maricopa County with a 24 percent increase in population during the past decade. The
actual number of County and MIHS employees varies from month to month. For FY11-12 and
FY10-11, actual positions were 16,757 and 17,150 respectively. Size and growth, while
economically positive, can negatively impact claim frequency. Risk Management’s emphasis on
responsible claim handling and a strong proactive loss prevention and safety program is designed to
keep any increase in claims frequency to a minimum.

I-2

Cost of Risk
Cost of Risk is a comparison of the Risk Management program and costs of claims and claims
related expenses to the County’s overall expenditures or budget in the fiscal year. The effectiveness
of a risk management program can be reflected in this comparison since the cost of a risk
management program includes paid claims (amounts paid in the fiscal year without regard to the
year the claim arose), insurance premiums, safety and loss control programs, and operational and
administrative expenses, against the total County's expenditures or budget. For FY09-10, the Cost of
Risk was 1.01%, and increased in FY11-12 to 1.32%. Risk Management’s commitment is to
maintain this measure at or below 2%.
Claims and Premiums
Auto Liability
General Liability
Medical Malpractice
Environmental Liability
Property/Auto Physical Damage
Workers' Compensation
Unemployment
Premiums
Subtotal
Other Expenses
Legal Expenses
Actuary Fees
Broker Fees
Consulting and Management Fees
Claims Administration Service Fees
Workers’ Compensation Taxes
Administrative
Subtotal
Total Risk Management Costs
Total County Expenditures
TOTAL COST AS A
PERCENTAGE OF COUNTY
EXPENDITURES
Notes:

1.
2.
3.

ACTUAL
FY09-10
$1,714,581
$1,448,516
$1,649,324
$0
$249,392
$4,701,475
$1,810,153
$3,623,022
$15,196,463

ACTUAL
FY10-11
$571,090
$4,657,481
$178,350
$0
$670,842
$5,527,232
$1,315,009
$3,788,533
$16,708,537

ACTUAL
FY11-12
$1,073,578
$3,884,430
$4,706,365
$1,633,492
$75,589
$4,441,728
$1,608,813
$3,766,441
$21,190,436

$4,900,396
$42,100
$59,001
$82,943
$601,899
$415,367
$2,172,557
$8,274,263
$23,470,726

$4,193,937
$44,400
$59,000
$69,790
$656,260
$518,609
$2,346,738
$7,888,734
$24,597,271

$7,467,154
$55,980
$59,000
$41,991
$759,000
$408,091
$2,280,774
$11,071,990
$32,262,426

$2,318,510,352

$2,486,658,082

$2,446,649,088

1.01%

0.99%

1.32%

Paid claims represents the amount paid in the fiscal year regardless of occurrence date and
does not include Reported But Not Paid (RBNP) or Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) reserves.
Amounts as valued for the period through June 30, 2012, as reported in the Advantage Financial System.
County expenditures do not include internal service funds per Internal Audit recommendation.

I-3

CLAIMS DIVISION
The Risk Management Claims Division is staffed with a manager, supervisor, three senior
adjusters, one junior adjuster, and three administrative employees. The Division is committed to
reducing Maricopa County’s cost of risk through prudent claim and litigation management
arising from the County’s employee, auto, property and liability exposures. The Division also
manages the County’s workers’ compensation and unemployment claims through two third-party
claim administrators.
Claims and lawsuits are investigated, evaluated and then either denied or resolved via litigation
or settlement. Litigated matters are assigned to either in-house counsel within the County
Attorney’s Office or outside counsel pursuant to contract. Thereafter, the Division manages the
assigned attorneys to minimize expense and obtain expeditious and fair resolutions.
The Division also manages the Subsequent Remedial Measures Program, the purpose and intent
of which is to assist departments in (1) identifying the root cause(s) of events which have
precipitated a Notice of Claim and/or lawsuit against Maricopa County and its employees, agents
and volunteers, and (2) formulating a subsequent remedial measures plan designed to mitigate
future claims and/or lawsuits arising out of the same or substantially similar root cause(s).
The Division also manages the Roundtable Program for high exposure and other sensitive
claims. This program assists the Division, the defendant departments and employees, agents and
volunteers, and defense counsel with the formulation and critical review of litigation tactics,
strategies, and related evidentiary issues.
Fiscal Year 11-12 Summary
In Fiscal Year (FY) 11-12, the Division managed 2,569 new workers’ compensation, auto
liability, auto physical damage, general liability, environmental liability, environmental property
damage, professional liability, medical malpractice, and property claims, a decrease of 737
claims, which is a 22.29% decrease from FY10-11.
CLAIM COUNTS BY FY
WORKERS COMPENSATION
PROPERTY DAMAGE
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

FY 11/12

GENERAL LIABILITY

FY 10/11

ENVIROMENTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE

FY 09/10

ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY
AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE
AUTO LIABILITY

0

500

II-1

1000

1500

2000

It should be noted that there were 495 property and auto physical damage claims attributed to the
October 5, 2010 hail storm, which were included in the FY10-11 claim counts. While the filing
of new claims decreased, the relative severity of the claims significantly increased from FY1011.
For all such claims and lawsuits, the Division paid $23,030,597, an increase of $5,688,366,
which is an increase of 33% from FY10-11.
PAYMENTS MADE BY FY
WORKERS COMPENSATION

PROPERTY DAMAGE

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

FY 11/12
FY 10/11

GENERAL LIABILITY

FY 09/10

ENVIROMENTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE

ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY

AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE

AUTO LIABILITY

$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

$8,000,000

$9,000,000

The Division also provided the following services to County departments and districts:
•

Management of the County’s third-party workers’ compensation claim administrator that
adjusts employee workers’ compensation claims. In FY11-12, 1,443 new workers’
compensation claims were re-opened or filed by County employees, a decrease of 322, which
is a decrease of 18.24% from FY10-11. In addition to claim adjusting, Risk Management’s
vendors conduct bill/invoice reviews and apply available discounts when injured County
employees utilize a Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) (a medical services network). In
FY11-12, the County realized a net savings of $3,203,531, which equates to a 51% savings
from billed charges and a 6% increase in savings over FY 10-11 results.

II-2

ADVANTAGE BILL REVIEW
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000

FY 09/10
FY 10/11
FY 11/12

$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
Bille d Charge s

Allowable s

Ne t Savings

•

Recovery of $562,940.19 in subrogation on claims against third parties, and $469,493.75 in
subrogation on workers’ compensation claims.

•

Consultation services to departments concerning coverage, exposures, perils, risk
management issues, and pending claims and litigation.

•

Review of indemnity and insurance requirements for County contracts.

•

Oversight of vendors and contractors providing Risk Management services, auto and
property appraisals, auto repair and structured settlement services.

•

Coordination of claim adjusting and recovery from the County’s property, aviation and crime
insurance policies, as well as from the County’s excess liability and medical malpractice
insurers.

•

Development of a database to track and monitor County volunteers for purpose of workers’
compensation and Risk Trust liability coverage. To date, over 100 programs and over 4,000
volunteers have been identified and included within the database.

II-3

SAFETY DIVISION
The focus of the Risk Management Safety Division is collaborating with other departments
countywide to innovatively develop safety programs which assist in meeting strategic goals. Risk
mitigation, loss reduction and compliance are achieved by interaction with departments utilizing
a variety of proven safety strategies reducing negative outcomes and increasing productivity. Our
goal is to mitigate exposures thus minimizing preventable injuries/accidents. Our road map to
success is a four-step process:
1. Obtain management’s support of County safety policies.
2. Train employees in safe work practices and safety/hazard awareness and identification.
3. Identify potential risks and develop safer, less risky alternatives to accomplish the task or
process.
4. Maintain an effective, comprehensive and compliant accident/incident control program.
This four-step process and the cooperation of the various departments have been instrumental in
reducing injuries and vehicle accidents. Two examples of continually improving departmental
safety performance are the Injury Incident Rate and Vehicle Collision Claims as noted below.
In FY11-12, workers’ compensation data realized an overall decrease of 33 recordable injuries.
There were 498 injuries in FY11-12 versus 531 injuries in FY10-11. The injury incident rate has
been in a steady decline over the past three years. The County’s overall rate reduction from
FY09-10 to FY11-12 was 0.28 with a total injury severity (cost) reduction of $1,818,221.40.
Injury Incident Rate
FY 11-12

FY 10-11

FY 09-10

3.2

3.25

3.3

3.35

3.4

3.45

3.5

3.55

3.6

3.65

3.7

Additionally, in FY11-12 there was overall decrease of 68 vehicle collision claims. There were
256 vehicle collisions in FY11-12 versus 324 vehicle collisions in FY10-11. The collision
incident rate has also been in a steady decline over the past three years. The County’s overall
vehicle collision incident rate reduction from FY09-10 to FY11-12 was 3.48.

III-1

Collision Incident Rate

FY 11-12
FY 10-11
FY 09-10
0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

The Risk Management Safety Division offers a total solution for safety awareness and safety
compliance training. We will continue partnering with all County departments to reduce the
injury incident rate and collision incident rate utilizing the following Safety strategies:
Risk Management Safety Training
SafeStart: In 2011, the Risk Management Safety/Environmental Divisions implemented the
SafeStart Program. Eight Safety/Environmental Consultants completed training and qualified
as SafeStart Instructors. In October 2011, they began introducing SafeStart to the Flood
Control District Operations Division. Over the next 6 months, sixty (60) Flood Control
District employees attended and completed the first phase of the SafeStart program.
Road Builder: The Maricopa County and Gateway Community College’s Road Builder
Heavy Equipment Certification Program graduated four (4) County employees in 2012. This
includes one student who also completed an AS degree in Heavy Equipment Operation.
These employees completed 120 hours of college credit, for a cost savings to the County of
$9,000.
Maricopa County Equipment Training Network: The job of keeping hundreds of County
employees trained and qualified on over 40 types of equipment is a difficult task. County
Departments such as Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT), Flood Control
District, Waste Resources and Recycling Management and Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office
have joined together with the Safety Division to develop a program to manage this training.
On-Site Safety Training Programs: Due to staffing issues, not all departments can send
employees to off-site training, thus the Safety Division provides training at employee worksites
focused on the needs of the department. This training can be task or program specific or targeted
to re-educate employees in safe procedures. Targeted training often addresses an increase in
accidents or near misses.
Examples of targeted training include:
•

Personal Protective Equipment--unique to more hazardous activities, such as fall
protection.
III-2

•
•

Heat Stress Awareness--for employees working outside during summer months.
Safe Lifting and Back Injury Prevention.

Examples of routine training offered at multiple locations to accommodate the scheduling needs
of departments include:
•
•
•
•

Defensive Driving
Hazard Communication
Bloodborne Pathogen Awareness
Fire Extinguisher Awareness and Emergency Evacuation.

An example of special circumstance training that arises from unusual conditions of employment
is the Safety in the Field -- Personal Safety Awareness for Public Health course.
Provisions for departments to provide their own training due to 24-hour operations are:
•
•
•

Train-the-Trainer programs for Animal Care and Control Department
Slips, Trips and Falls
Hazard Communication

Commercial Driver’s License (CDL): Several County employees are required to drive
commercial vehicles to perform their duties at the County. These employees require specialized
training and a CDL from Motor Vehicles Department (MVD) to drive these vehicles. In order to
minimize department down time, the Safety Division’s fleet safety consultant provides on-site
programs. These include:
•
•

•
•

Providing a three-day training program to prepare employees to take the written
examination required to obtain a CDL from the MVD.
Serving as a third party tester for MVD. The Fleet Safety Consultant provides
approved and recognized testing services as required by the State for employees, so
that they do not have to go back to MVD for the hands-on testing.
Providing all CDL annual training to departments requiring CDL drivers.
Administering the required substance abuse monitoring program.

Off-site Safety Training: Requires an off-site location due to the type of training.
•

Welding Safety Training and Certification -- All County departments that have
cutting and welding activities require training to comply with OSHA and ANSI safety
requirements. Training and certification is administered by an outside contractor.

•

Collision Avoidance Driving Safety -- This course is two hours of classroom driver
safety and a one hour field exercise. Employees operate vehicles through a course to
learn parking lot backing, lane change and serpentine and evasive maneuvers. The
Safety Division also instructs various other driver safety classes such as Utility Truck,
Trailer Towing Safety and Defensive Driving.
III-3

Safety Fair: The 2012 Safety Fair was a great success. Ninety-three (93) safety classes were
taught with 2,841 people attending. The Flood Control District won the Safety Bowl
competition; Waste Resources and Recycling Management won the Big Dig; and the Flood
Control District’s Office Safety Contest was very popular with employees.
Additional Safety Strategies: The Safety Division uses a wide variety of recognized safety
program techniques in addition to training to keep County employees safe. These include:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Facilities and Field Inspections
Departmental Program Reviews
Departmental Policy and Procedure Development and Review
Safety Committees
Job Safety Analysis
Accident Investigations With Corrective Actions/Recommendations.

As Maricopa County continues developing safety management systems, it is necessary that each
level of management take a proactive role in safety improvement. Management commitment,
front-line supervision and accountability are the keys to sustain a successful safety processes and
reduce unsafe work practices.

III-4

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION
The Environmental Division of Risk Management conducts remedial investigations and takes
action to minimize County environmental liability as determined by law, regulation, statute,
and/or court order. The Division provides leadership in the area of pollution prevention and
environmental management, and has developed a proactive assessment and action process that
mitigates environmental liabilities, saving the County in the cost of remedial action and
regulatory penalties. Possible environmental liability costs of known sites have been reduced
from previous estimates of over $500 million for FY95-96, to approximately $8,823,373 for
FY11-12.
This fiscal year the Division:
•

•
•
•

•

•

•

•

•

Continued to cooperate with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) in
conducting site characterization of groundwater contamination at the Cave Creek
Landfill. Two new groundwater wells were installed. A soil vapor pilot test was
conducted at the deep soil vapor monitoring well.
Soil contamination discovered during demolition of the Durango Vehicle Wash Facility
was investigated and characterized. Soil and groundwater sampling was completed.
Continued to participate with the Hassayampa Steering Committee in working towards
the remediation of the Hassayampa Superfund Site.
Completed in-house assessments and remedial oversight for industrial hygiene, indoor air
quality and mold (43), asbestos (113) and lead paint (8). This represents a 588% increase
in these types of projects since Risk Management first brought them in-house in FY 2007.
Settled claim by Maricopa Air Quality Department against Maricopa County Solid Waste
Department and Allied Waste for Title V Air permit violations at the Queen Creek
Landfill. County’s share of the settlement was $818,000.
Revised Hazard Communication Training to comply with OSHA’s recent Globally
Harmonized System (GHS) amendments and began testing delivery to County employees
via live webinar.
Conducted inspections of County owned and maintained drywells. Recommendations
were turned over to Facilities Maintenance for required repairs and for best practices
repairs. These repairs help reduce regulatory liability and general liability for the County.
Previously, a consultant had been paid to inspect the drywells as part of a larger storm
water project.
Assisted Facilities Management, Superior Courts, Real Estate, Maricopa County Sheriff’s
Office (MCSO), Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT), Juvenile and
Adult Probation, Flood Control District, Legal Defender, Environmental Services,
Animal Control, Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Assessor, Agricultural Exchange,
WIC, Solid Waste, Public Health, Medical Examiner, and the Library District in
environmental studies, hazardous waste reviews and clean-ups, and conducting indoor air
quality review, asbestos and lead paint surveys.
Continued to provide sound environmental compliance information to requesting
departments.

IV-1

The Division recognizes that environmental risks are capable of being managed through risk
control and prevention measures. These measures include separation of hazardous materials,
effective pollution prevention and loss control techniques, redundant controls and safety
mechanisms, double and triple containment of tanks and flow tubes, emergency response plans,
and effective training of employees. The Division will continue to seek to implement these
measures.

IV-2

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION
The Administrative Division is responsible for procuring the insurance policies above the County’s
self-insured retention, providing certificates of insurance to County departments, preparing the
annual user charges for services, preparing the annual budget and financial statements for the Risk
Trust, and providing administrative support to the other divisions within the department. Included
in this report is a comparison of the assets and liabilities of the Risk Trust over a three-year period,
the trend of the current insurance market, a budget summary, and the financial statements through
fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
Self-Insured Trust Fund
Combined Balance Sheet Comparison
FY09-10, FY10-11, FY11-12

Assets
Liabilities
Net Assets (deficit)

Audited
FY09-10
$63,134,669
$91,891,866
($28,757,197)

Audited
FY10-11
$63,644,422
$133,427,607
($69,783,185)

Audited
FY11-12
$ 50,811,019
$130,582,900
($ 79,771,881)

During the FY09-10 through FY11-12 period, the Risk Trust’s assets decreased $12,323,650, or
19.52%, from $63,134,669 to $50,811,019. During the same period, the Trust’s liabilities increased
$38,691,034, or 42.10%, from $91,891,866 to $130,582,900. The deficit in Risk Trust net assets is
a result of a spend down of the Risk Trust fund in fiscal years when user departments were only
charged for administrative costs even though claims and insurance continued to be paid by Risk
Management on behalf of user departments.
The Risk Trust began billing user departments for the full costs of claims and insurance and
administrative costs in FY99-00. On an annual basis, the Risk Trust funding plan calculates the
total Risk Management’s expenses for the fiscal year and the next year’s claims and claims related
expenses. The County does not fund the Risk Trust for all reserves; however, the reserves are part
of the liability calculation. It is not the intent of the funding plan to decrease the deficit, but to
continue to fund for the next year’s claims and claims related expenses.
Insurance Policies
Risk Management continually analyzes insurance market trends. Due to recent claims and weather
related events, it is expected that insurance premiums in all lines of coverage will increase.
However, experts differ over whether or not the “hard” insurance market of the last few years may
abate. Potential increases in annual premium costs may not be as great as in the past years. Risk
Management works closely with our insurance broker to aggressively pursue reasonable insurance
coverages to protect the County.
At the close of this fiscal year, the County’s major insurance policies are as follows:

V-1

Coverage

Policy Period

Limits

Deductible/SIR

General Liability
(Excess Liability)

3/1/12 – 3/1/13

$15 million
$35 million

$5 million SIR

Medical Malpractice

12/4/11 – 12/4/12

$25 million

$5 million SIR

Workers’ Compensation

7/1/12 – 7/1/13

$25 million

$2 million SIR

Property Damage

7/1/12 – 7/1/13

$500 million

$100,000 per occ.

Budget Summary
The expenditure budget for the Risk Management Department for FY11-12 was $56,912,696, of
which $2,068,388 was for personnel costs, $317,770 supplies and services, and $54,526,538 was
for insurance, legal, and claims and claims related expenditures. On a percentage basis, 95.81% of
Risk Management’s budget is committed to insurance, legal, claims and claim related expenditures.
The revenue budget for the Risk Management Department for FY11-12 was $16,231,190, of
which $15,756,190 was from user charges and $475,000 from interest earnings. On a percentage
basis, 97.07% of the revenue is from user charges. These user charges are based on actuarially
estimated claims payments and insurance projections Risk Management will pay on behalf of
County departments.

Note:

The auditors have not reviewed and are not providing an opinion as to the information disclosed in the annual
report.

V-2

TOTAL COST SUMMARY CHART
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

FY 11-12

Workers’ Compensation
Property Damage

Paid
Reserves

Professional Liability
Medical Malpractice
General Liability
Environmental Property
Environmental Liability
Auto Physical Damage

FY 10-11

Auto Liability
Workers’ Compensation
Property Damage
Professional Liability
Medical Malpractice
General Liability
Environmental Property
Environmental Liability

FY 09-10

Auto Physical Damage
Auto Liability
Workers’ Compensation
Property Damage
Professional Liability
Medical Malpractice
General Liability
Environmental Property
Environmental Liability
Auto Physical Damage
Auto Liability
$0

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

$14,000,000

$16,000,000

$18,000,000

Notes:
1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures
from FY09-10 give a truer picture as these claims have had time to mature.
2. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system except for Workers’ Compensation amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported
by the Pinnacle system.
3. Unemployment not included.
4. Small dollar amounts may not be visible on the chart, but they are included in the data.

VI-1

TOTAL COST SUMMARY TABLE
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

Auto Physical Environmental
Auto Liability
Damage
Liability

FY 09-10

FY 10-11

FY 11-12

Environmental
Property
Damage

General
Liability

Medical
Malpractice

Professional
Liability

Property
Damage

Worker’s
Compensation

$ Paid

$444,008

$322,984

$720

$9,301

$3,892,227

$4,667,075

$249,122

$10,331

$4,657,371

Open Reserves

$128,712

$4,000

$1,479,280

$0

$12,753,128

$4,251,256

$0

$9,669

$366,638

Total Incurred5

$572,721

$326,984

$1,480,000

$9,301

$16,645,355

$8,918,332

$249,122

$20,000

$5,024,009

$ Paid

$943,263

$817,653

$0

$33,406

$793,137

$86,819

$374,271

$1,237,460

$3,042,319

Open Reserves

$2,398,090

$235,981

$0

$16,091

$2,961,081

$1,511,162

$968

$144,636

$325,114

Total Incurred5

$3,341,353

$1,053,634

$0

$0

$3,754,217

$1,597,982

$375,239

$1,382,096

$3,367,433

$ Paid

$66,573

$210,683

$0

$0

$70,628

$4,222

$135,045

$2,550

$2,309,301

Open Reserves

$143,180

$115,578

$0

$2

$621,661

$388,388

$2,028

$50,002

$2,439,421

Total Incurred5

$209,753

$326,262

$0

$2

$692,289

$392,610

$137,073

$52,552

$4,748,722

Notes:
1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures
from FY09-10 give a truer picture as these claims have had time to mature.
2. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system except for Workers’ Compensation amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported
by the Pinnacle system.
3. Unemployment not included.
4. Total Incurred = $ Paid plus Open Reserves, minus Total Recoveries.
5. The totals are derived using both dollars and cents. The cents are removed for presentation purposes and all dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.

VI-2

TOTAL CLAIMS SUMMARY TABLE
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

65

$227,397

75

$104,163

66

$88,411

ANIMAL CONTROL

96

$406,610

96

$86,903

76

$55,253

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

17

$68,340

31

$111,473

22

$25,579

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

84

$69,219

55

$55,850

72

$61,720

COUNTY ASSESSOR

9

$40,695

11

$32,261

13

$19,393

COUNTY ATTORNEY

58

$1,520,344

68

$1,364,687

44

$78,212

ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT

6

$7,660

15

$33,354

4

$5,754

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

45

$22,468

57

$94,498

39

$17,209

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

14

$73,034

32

$275,655

5

$1,777

HUMAN SERVICES

30

$57,319

34

$32,813

23

$36,094

JUVENILE PROBATION

83

$445,394

106

$259,547

114

$204,024

LEGAL ADVOCATE

0

$62,002

3

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

376

$0

3

$0

$5,810,512

422

$776,171

383

$504,901

MEDICAL EXAMINER

7

$8,436

25

$22,960

15

$29,379

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH

8

$79,621

9

$3,173

11

$31,470

PARKS & RECREATION

15

$19,012

26

$30,123

14

$137,345

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

11

$32,668

4

$5,704

12

$15,174

PUBLIC DEFENDER

36

$124,393

26

$16,580

22

$27,729

PUBLIC FIDUCIARY

7

$11,069

3

$1,109

7

$2,067

PUBLIC HEALTH

38

$52,013

52

$215,461

38

$42,823

PUBLIC WORKS

244

$493,707

465

$717,711

175

$264,708

RISK MANAGEMENT

19

$620,756

10

$44,906

5

SHERIFF

906

$3,911,909

937

$2,722,856

824

$990,471

TRIAL COURTS

48

$73,507

48

$45,647

39

$40,811

ALL OTHERS

78

$15,054

120

$274,723

73

$111,018

$14,253,139

2730

$7,328,328

TOTAL
Notes:

2300

2099

$7,680

$2,799,002

1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system except for Workers’ Compensation
amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the Pinnacle system.
4. Unemployment not included.
5. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-3

TOTAL NUMBER OF CLAIMS SUMMARY CHART
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY 09-10

FY 11-12

FY 10-11

48

85
343

1226

53
1

349

791
1223

191

473

1

3

0
112

1

55
220

5

37

FY 09-10 to FY 11-12

Auto Physical Damage
Automobile Liability

1483

Environmental Liability
Environmental Property Damage

237

General Liability
3821

Medical Malpractice

1013

Professional Liability
395

Property

115
9

Workers' Compensation
Notes: Unemployment not included.

VI-4

1
23

1372

104

349
63

0

53
3

TOTAL NUMBER OF CLAIMS SUMMARY TABLE
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

FY 09-10

FY 10-11

FY 11-12

Auto Physical Damage

343

791

349

Automobile Liability

85

104

48

Environmental Liability

53

0

0

Environmental Property Damage

1

1

1

General Liability

473

349

191

Medical Malpractice

55

37

23

Professional Liability

1

5

3

Property Damage

63

220

112

Workers' Compensation

1226

1223

1372

TOTAL

2300

2730

2099

Notes: 1.
2.
3.
4.

Number of claims paid represents the amount of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
Unemployment not included.
Small dollar amounts may not be visible on the chart, but they are included in the data.
The Environmental Liability, Environmental Property Damage was previously not included in the report. The
Professional Liability types were previously included with the General Liability Claim Type. This FY is the first
year we have provided the data broken out separately.

VI-5

AUTO LIABILITY LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

2

$0

4

$0

2

$0

AIR QUALITY

1

$50

1

$0

1

$3,067

ANIMAL CONTROL

6

$38,001

2

$750

1

$0

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

0

$0

1

$0

0

$0

CONSTABLES

0

$0

2

$5,333

0

$0

COUNTY ATTORNEY

1

$2,447

0

$0

0

$0

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

3

$368

5

$4,437

2

$2,417

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

1

$4,906

0

$0

0

$0

JUVENILE PROBATION

0

$0

1

$0

2

$0

LEGAL DEFENDER

0

$0

1

$1,089

0

$0

LIBRARY DISTRICT

0

$0

2

$6,278

0

$0

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

2

$3,218

3

$430

1

$0

MEDICAL EXAMINER

0

$0

0

$0

3

$6,107

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH

0

$0

0

$0

1

$4,783

PARKS & RECREATION

0

$0

1

$806

0

$0

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

2

$2,595

0

$0

2

$2,590

PUBLIC HEALTH

0

$0

2

$0

4

$10,521

PUBLIC WORKS

18

$45,316

19

$111,943

10

$17,972

RISK MANAGEMENT

1

$434

0

$0

1

$718

SCHOOLS

0

$0

1

$2,408

0

$0

SHERIFF

45

$346,671

57

$809,787

16

$18,399

TRIAL COURTS

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

ALL OTHERS

2

$0

2

$0

2

$0

TOTALS

85

$444,008

$943,263

48

$66,573

Notes:

104

1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-6

AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

15

$14,760

37

$50,742

28

$901

AIR QUALITY

12

$217

8

$4,564

5

$3,628

ANIMAL CONTROL

20

$11,552

33

$740

16

$178

CONSTABLES

5

$1,823

8

$5,030

5

$12,271

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

1

$500

1

$0

1

$0

COUNTY ASSESSOR

2

$500

1

$0

0

$0

COUNTY ATTORNEY

5

$0

15

$14,250

5

$4,620

ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT

0

$0

2

$8,154

0

$0

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

21

$9,205

28

$10,937

16

$7,334

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

5

$10,991

16

$47,623

3

$0

HUMAN SERVICES

8

$1,776

2

$116

0

$0

JUVENILE PROBATION

2

$0

14

$803

5

$5,507

LEGAL DEFENDER

1

$0

2

$1,993

0

$0

LIBRARY DISTRICT

0

$0

3

$5,800

2

$111

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

3

$3,025

4

$1,959

4

$0

MEDICAL EXAMINER

0

$0

1

$155

3

$3,558

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH

2

$890

3

$458

3

$3,670

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

3

$16,677

2

$5,522

6

$7,688

PUBLIC DEFENDER

1

$2,663

1

$0

5

$8,831

PUBLIC HEALTH

1

$0

11

$9,795

7

$1,299

PUBLIC WORKS

50

$50,104

219

$141,216

51

$23,657

SCHOOLS

0

$0

$2,871

0

$0

SHERIFF

181

$198,301

2
348

$501,137

173

$125,572

TRIAL COURTS

1

$0

3

$3,789

1

$0

ALL OTHERS

4

$0

27

$0

10

$1,859

$322,984

791

$817,653

349

$210,683

TOTALS
Notes:

343

1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-7

ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

FY09-10

FY10-11

FY11-12

# Claims

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

PUBLIC WORKS

53

$720

0

$0

0

$0

TOTALS

53

$720

0

$0

0

$0

Department

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-8

ENVIRONMENTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

0

$0

1

$33,406

0

$0

PUBLIC WORKS

1

$9,301

0

$0

1

$0

TOTALS

1

$9,301

1

$33,406

1

$0

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-9

GENERAL LIABILITY LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

2

$0

3

$0

1

$0

ANIMAL CONTROL

18

$3,256

6

$1,832

9

$1,443

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

4

$0

0

$0

2

$0

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

6

$0

2

$5,223

0

$0

COUNTY ATTORNEY

40

$1,208,418

34

$101,278

15

$0

COUNTY MANAGERS OFFICE

1

$1,500

4

$28,018

0

$0

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

4

$0

3

$389

1

$0

FLOOD CONTROL

1

$0

2

$0

0

$0

JUVENILE PROBATION

2

$0

0

$0

0

$0

LEGAL DEFENDER

2

$0

2

$28,000

2

$6,829

LIBRARY DISTRICT

1

0

1

0

1

0

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

19

$9,475

19

$35,100

13

$44

MEDICAL EXAMINER

0

$0

4

$0

2

$10,330

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

3

$12,199

1

$0

1

$0

PUBLIC DEFENDER

18

$0

16

$0

9

$1,330

PUBLIC FIDUCIARY

1

$0

1

$0

1

$0

PUBLIC HEALTH

3

$0

1

$0

1

$0

PUBLIC WORKS

64

$298,351

49

$104,799

22

$3,526

RECORDER

1

$0

2

$73,020

1

$35,000

RISK MANAGEMENT

14

$597,687

6

$36,492

0

$0

SCHOOLS

1

$0

1

$0

0

$0

SHERIFF

226

$1,754,161

141

$358,112

76

$11,677

TRIAL COURTS

22

$7181

15

$195

13

$448

WORKFORCE MGT & DEV

1

$0

2

$20,679

1

$0

ALL OTHERS

19

$0

34

$0

20

$0

TOTALS

473

$3,892,227

349

$793,137

191

$70,628

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-10

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LOSS SUMMARY
FY10-11 TO FY11-12

FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

43

$29,496

24

$14,770

20

$4,222

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

12

$4,637,579

13

$72,049

2

$0

NON-JURISDICTIONAL

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

TOTALS

55

$4,667,075

37

$86,819

23

$4,222

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-11

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

COUNTY ATTORNEY

0

$0

3

$1,230,367

3

$2,550

LEGAL DEFENDER

0

$0

1

$7,093

0

$0

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

1

$10,331

1

$0

0

$0

TOTALS

1

$10,331

5

$1,237,460

3

$2,550

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-12

PROPERTY DAMAGE LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

1

$0

2

$23,915

0

$0

AIR QUALITY

2

$0

4

$0

1

$0

ANIMAL CONTROL

2

$1,230

8

$0

8

$0

CONSTABLES

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

COUNTY ASSESSOR

0

$0

0

$0

1

$500

COUNTY ATTORNEY

0

$0

1

$1,151

0

$0

ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT

1

$699

0

$0

0

$0

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

3

$564

1

$0

3

$0

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

1

$4,770

1

$6,075

0

$0

HUMAN SERVICES

5

$4,532

3

$0

1

$0

LIBRARY DISTRICT

0

$0

0

$0

2

$0

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

3

$70,397

4

$1,033

6

$3,116

MEDICAL EXAMINER

0

$0

1

$1,208

0

$0

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH

1

$38,899

2

$0

3

$18,148

PARKS & RECREATION

3

$12,352

3

$7,273

5

$29,493

PUBLIC FIDUCIARY

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

PUBLIC HEALTH

3

$3,479

7

$51,430

5

$739

PUBLIC WORKS

23

$33,385

147

$243,465

56

$58,213

RECORDER

1

$699

0

$0

0

$0

RISK MANAGEMENT

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

SHERIFF

12

$78,115

35

$38,721

17

$24,365

TRIAL COURTS

1

$0

1

$0

1

$472

TOTALS

63

$249,122

220

$374,271

112

$135,045

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the RiskMaster system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-13

UNEMPLOYMENT LOSS SUMMARY – PAID IN YEAR
FY09-10 TO FY11-12

Department

FY09-10

FY10-11

FY11-12

$ Paid

$ Paid

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

$94,963

$41,087

$50,375

AIR QUALITY

$40,138

$58,126

$43,242

$9,695

$6,010

$11,433

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

$59,988

$45,545

$32,349

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

$54,186

$70,487

$53,198

COUNTY ASSESSOR

$20,864

$27,167

$8,880

COUNTY ATTORNEY

$34,174

$41,940

$51,004

ELECTIONS

$47,996

$50,201

$34,192

EMPLOYEE HEALTH INITIATIVES

$21,740

$6,720

$0

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

$42,191

$13,069

$7,931

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

$10,718

$4,800

$8,880

FINANCE

$11,037

$815

$0

$9,360

$11,006

$2,061

$238,578

$189,162

$158,193

JUSTICE COURTS

$19,612

$24,598

$21,626

JUVENILE PROBATION

$78,640

$74,044

$42,783

LIBRARY

$18,605

$8,417

$13,722

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

$371,276

$181,678

$383,120

PLANNING & DEVELOPEMENT

$64,542

$28,320

$0

PUBLIC DEFENDER

$10,662

$13,831

$4,363

PUBLIC HEALTH

$62,369

$74,031

$59,215

PUBLIC WORKS

$29,000

$0

$35,057

SHERIFF

$95,162

$76,743

$72,493

TRIAL COURTS

$164,529

$121,528

$49,072

ALL OTHERS

$200,130

$502,978

$91,931

$1,810,153

$1,672,302

$1,235,120

ANIMAL CONTROL

HUMAN RESOURCES
HUMAN SERVICES

TOTALS

Notes: 1. Dollars paid represents the amount paid for the fiscal year. There are no reserves for unemployment.
2. Amounts as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the Advantage Financial System.

VI-14

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LOSS SUMMARY
FY09-10 TO FY11-12
FY09-10
Department

# Claims

FY10-11

$ Paid

# Claims

FY11-12

$ Paid

# Claims

$ Paid

ADULT PROBATION

45

$212,638

29

$29,506

35

$87,510

AIR QUALITY

6

$1,387

6

$7,488

9

$11,977

ANIMAL CONTROL

50

$352,571

47

$83,581

42

$53,632

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

13

$68,340

26

$111,473

18

$23,966

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH

34

$39,222

28

$35,857

50

$57,498

COUNTY ASSESSOR

6

$40,195

10

$32,261

12

$18,893

COUNTY ATTORNEY

12

$309,478

15

$17,641

21

$71,042

ELECTIONS

5

$6,961

12

$25,200

4

$5,754

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

14

$12,331

20

$78,736

17

$7,458

EQUIPMENT SERVICES

7

$52,367

14

$188,551

2

$1,777

HUMAN SERVICES

17

$51,012

28

$32,697

20

$36,094

JUSTICE COURTS

7

$5,482

8

$13,496

10

$903

JUVENILE PROBATION

79

$445,394

91

$258,744

107

$198,517

LIBRARY DISTRICT

8

$0

7

$8,966

9

$33,636
$501,741

MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER

336

$1,076,488

378

$665,599

357

MEDICAL EXAMINER

7

$8,436

19

$21,597

7

$9,385

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH

5

$39,832

3

$2,714

3

$4,870

PARKS & RECREATION

9

$6,661

8

$22,044

7

$107,852

PUBLIC DEFENDER

17

$121,730

9

$16,580

7

$17,568

PUBLIC FIDUCIARY

5

$11,069

2

$1,109

4

$1,821

PUBLIC HEALTH

31

$48,534

31

$154,237

21

$30,264

PUBLIC WORKS

35

$56,529

31

$116,287

35

$161,340

SHERIFF

442

$1,534,662

356

$1,015,099

542

$810,459

TRIAL COURTS

23

$66,326

29

$41,663

24

$39,891

ALL OTHERS

13

$89,730

16

$61,195

9

$15,453

TOTALS

1226

$4,657,371

1223

$3,042,319

1372

$2,309,301

Notes: 1. Dollars paid listed above represents payments on claims by event date, not actual payment date, and does not include
RBNP or IBNR reserves. Due to lag time in resolution and payment of claims, the figures from FY09-10 give a truer
picture of the cost of these claims as they have had time to mature.
2. Number of claims represents the number of claims for the year in which the event occurred.
3. Amounts are as valued on June 30, 2012, as reported by the Pinnacle system.
4. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The totals are first derived from the non-rounded amounts then
rounded.

VI-15