FY 2008-09 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District, Library District, Stadium District Adopted Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Flood Control District Flood Control District Motions Transmittal Letter Flood Control District Mission and Vision Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Capital Improvement Program 1 2 3 4 9 13 15 17 Library District Library District Motions Transmittal Letter Library District Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Capital Improvement Program 83 84 85 86 88 92 96 98 101 Stadium District Stadium District Motions Transmittal Letter Stadium District Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Debt Service 106 107 108 109 113 117 119 120 123 Special Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvements Levies 127 128 Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Flood Control District Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Library District Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Stadium District Minimum Fund Balance for Cash Flow Purposes i 134 136 138 139 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Table of Contents ii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Motions Flood Control District Approve the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Tentative Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Flood Control District in the amount of $95,962,288; and set a public hearing to solicit public comment on the FY 2008-09 Budget for Monday, June 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Adopted Fiscal Year 2008-09 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $95,962,288, which is $885,895 (1.0%) less than the prior fiscal year’s revised budget. Decreased expenditures are mainly due to reduced spending in capital projects. Budgeted capital project expenditures have decreased by $793,000 (1.3%) in Fiscal Year 2008-09. There is a slight increase in operating activities such as floodplain enforcement and inspections. The budget also provides for a more focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2004 Through FY 2009 $70,000,000 In Fiscal Year 2008-09 the Flood Control $60,718,007 $60,000,000 $58,006,298 $60,000,000 District will be lowering its tax rate from $55,128,752 $47,741,781 $0.1533 to $0.1367. The District was $50,000,000 $42,692,818 directed by the Board of Directors to $40,000,000 implement a cap of 2% on its tax levy $30,000,000 growth, excluding new construction, in order to protect taxpayers from tax $20,000,000 increases due to increases in assessed $10,000,000 property values. The reduced rate results $in a property tax revenue budget of FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Adopted $74,096,526. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals to $14,910,000 for cost- sharing with cities and towns on capital projects. In Fiscal Year 2008-09, the Flood Control District has budgeted total revenue of $98.4 million, which is $6.9 million (7.5%) more than in Fiscal Year 2007-08. The Adopted Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $1.5 million for the Flood Prone Properties Acquisition program. In all, the Flood Control District has 28 scheduled projects totaling $300 million in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Mission The mission of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is to provide flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation, and education to the people in Maricopa County so that they can reduce their risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding while enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The vision of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is that the people of Maricopa County and future generations will have the maximum amount of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multiple-use facilities that complement or enhance the beauty of our desert environment. 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity – All Funds FY 2006-07 ACTUAL SOURCES 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2008-09 ADOPTED $ 1,458 1,458 $ 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 4,000 $ 137,884 133,884 4,000 $ 4,000 4,000 $ - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FCSR - CUSTOMER SERVICE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 6,000 0.0% 0.0% 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLIANCE $ 154,294 154,172 122 $ 1,004,000 1,000,000 4,000 $ 1,004,000 1,000,000 4,000 $ 407,688 404,490 3,198 $ 145,000 140,000 5,000 $ (859,000) (860,000) 1,000 -85.6% -86.0% 25.0% 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE DAMS - DAM SAFETY $ 20,204,975 13,257,922 6,636,340 310,713 $ 18,863,300 17,042,874 1,820,426 - $ 18,863,300 17,042,874 1,820,426 - $ 20,321,991 16,683,998 3,637,993 - $ 15,509,000 13,550,000 599,000 1,360,000 $ (3,354,300) (3,492,874) (1,221,426) 1,360,000 -17.8% -20.5% -67.1% 0.0% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES $ 231,354 231,354 - $ 468,000 468,000 - $ 468,000 468,000 - $ 468,309 468,309 - $ 6,873,683 38,000 6,835,683 $ 6,405,683 1368.7% (430,000) -91.9% 6,835,683 0.0% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 66,686,092 66,686,092 $ 70,582,697 70,582,697 $ 70,582,697 70,582,697 $ 70,963,285 70,963,285 $ 75,129,910 75,129,910 $ 4,547,213 4,547,213 6.4% 6.4% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT $ 373,258 373,258 $ 602,000 602,000 $ 602,000 602,000 $ 602,001 602,001 $ 728,185 728,185 $ 126,185 126,185 21.0% 21.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ USES 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 87,651,594 $ 91,523,997 $ 91,523,997 $ 92,901,158 $ 98,395,778 $ 6,871,781 7.5% 10,988,343 7,770,774 3,217,569 $ 10,810,514 7,534,602 3,275,912 $ 11,017,522 7,741,607 3,275,915 $ 10,975,528 7,703,837 3,271,691 $ 7,768,668 4,941,286 2,827,382 $ 3,248,854 2,800,321 448,533 29.5% 36.2% 13.7% 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION EDAY - PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING $ 1,064,015 484,032 543,102 36,881 - $ 884,886 526,313 286,911 71,662 - $ 916,539 542,139 302,734 71,666 - $ 874,416 507,932 303,274 63,210 - $ 2,487,473 606,671 701,476 411,367 767,959 $ 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLIANCE $ 1,765,848 1,232,577 533,271 $ 3,166,963 1,778,609 1,388,354 $ 3,166,974 1,778,613 1,388,361 $ 2,913,677 1,518,884 1,394,793 $ 2,309,086 1,414,157 894,929 $ 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE FMLT - FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE MULTI-PURPOSE ENH DAMS - DAM SAFETY 64,238,802 54,966,971 6,955,017 2,316,814 $ 74,055,998 62,244,532 8,103,536 3,707,930 $ 73,881,075 62,037,542 8,103,544 3,739,989 $ 73,853,460 62,181,561 8,062,624 3,609,275 $ 73,667,893 55,414,706 6,481,664 2,909,229 8,862,294 $ (1,570,934) -171.4% (64,532) -11.9% (398,742) -131.7% (339,701) -474.0% (767,959) 0.0% 857,888 364,456 493,432 213,182 0.3% 6,622,836 10.7% 1,621,880 20.0% (2,909,229) 0.0% (5,122,305) -137.0% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES PROC - PROCUREMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ 3,321,736 85,533 2,495,725 343,703 170,750 226,025 - $ 3,097,216 87,441 2,014,791 563,978 181,783 249,223 - $ 3,097,166 87,441 2,014,751 563,973 181,783 249,218 - $ 3,191,344 73,889 2,092,582 522,591 176,034 326,248 - $ 3,653,032 109,111 1,301,249 281,321 198,956 364,208 753,956 628,611 15,620 $ 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES $ 1,432,112 1,108,407 323,705 $ 2,082,944 1,215,272 867,672 $ 2,082,944 1,215,272 867,672 $ 2,082,950 1,215,272 867,678 $ 3,094,639 1,232,332 1,862,307 $ 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEVELOP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT $ 2,401,018 440,707 639,470 1,320,841 - $ 2,785,963 391,500 754,323 1,640,140 - $ 2,785,963 391,500 754,323 1,640,140 - $ 2,966,610 582,470 901,808 1,482,332 - $ 2,981,497 508,418 200,904 584,801 1,655,416 31,958 $ (195,534) (116,918) (200,904) 169,522 (15,276) (31,958) TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 85,536,902 $ 96,884,484 $ 96,948,183 $ 96,857,985 $ 95,962,288 $ 985,895 4 27.1% 20.5% 35.5% (555,866) (21,670) 713,502 282,652 (17,173) (114,990) (753,956) (628,611) (15,620) -17.9% -24.8% 35.4% 50.1% -9.4% -46.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (1,011,695) -48.6% (17,060) -1.4% (994,635) -114.6% -7.0% -29.9% 0.0% 22.5% -0.9% 0.0% 1.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources FY 2006-07 ACTUAL FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2008-09 ADOPTED ALL FUNDS 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ 64,957,691 64,957,691 $ $ 69,683,115 69,683,115 $ $ 69,683,115 69,683,115 $ $ 69,683,116 69,683,116 $ $ 74,096,526 74,096,526 $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 2,341,904 2,341,904 $ $ 1,883,000 1,883,000 $ $ 1,883,000 1,883,000 $ $ 2,470,818 2,470,818 $ $ 746,000 746,000 $ $ (1,137,000) -60.4% (1,137,000) -60.4% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 76,602 13,012,335 199,736 13,288,673 $ $ $ 14,910,000 133,384 15,043,384 $ $ 16,817,882 149,582 16,967,464 $ $ 17,042,874 149,582 17,192,456 $ $ 17,042,874 149,582 17,192,456 $ (2,132,874) -12.5% (16,198) -10.8% (2,149,072) -12.5% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 12,000 12,000 $ $ - $ $ - MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ 1,528,665 5,534,661 7,063,326 $ $ $ 900,000 7,609,868 8,509,868 $ $ 1,130,896 2,636,864 3,767,760 $ $ 750,000 2,015,426 2,765,426 $ $ 750,000 2,015,426 2,765,426 $ 150,000 20.0% 5,594,442 277.6% 5,744,442 207.7% ALL REVENUES $ 87,651,594 $ 91,523,997 $ 91,523,997 $ 92,901,158 $ 98,395,778 $ 6,871,781 LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ (110,257,504) $ (110,257,504) $ TOTAL SOURCES $ (22,605,910) $ (58,628,253) $ (58,628,253) $ 32,895,744 5 $ (58,357,554) $ (58,357,554) $ 33,166,443 $ (58,357,554) $ (58,357,554) $ 34,543,604 $ - 4,413,411 4,413,411 6.3% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% - $ $ 58,357,554 ###### 58,357,554 ###### 98,395,778 $ 65,229,335 196.7% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Uses FY 2006-07 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 11,096,271 $ 130,582 86,503 3,249,004 183,884 (420,866) 1,547,748 15,873,126 $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 1,115,776 258,478 83,544 1,457,798 FY 2007-08 REVISED 10,933,300 $ 328,768 31,300 3,434,646 10,600 (2,229,687) 3,911,278 16,420,205 $ $ 1,945,595 243,812 164,700 304,157 2,658,264 $ FY 2007-08 FORECAST 10,933,300 $ 328,768 31,300 3,434,687 42,204 (2,229,687) 3,986,278 16,526,850 $ $ 1,945,595 243,812 164,700 304,157 2,658,264 $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 10,334,480 $ 128,042 71,880 3,230,003 196,104 (829,733) 3,312,824 16,443,600 $ $ 1,945,596 243,811 164,700 304,157 2,658,264 $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 17,256,170 17,256,170 $ $ $ 2,228,541 2,228,541 $ $ $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 388,231 $ 10,987,752 457,015 166,148 2,576,953 398 59,870 91,370 17,567 285,887 (85,306) 89,225 15,035,110 $ 214,467 $ 13,560,409 350,104 216,700 2,797,454 55,485 126,093 23,500 345,518 (21,585) 392,521 18,060,666 $ 214,467 $ 13,799,463 350,104 216,700 2,797,454 55,485 126,093 23,500 345,518 (21,585) 392,521 18,299,720 $ 214,469 $ 13,799,464 350,107 216,700 2,797,458 55,487 126,093 23,500 345,518 (20,267) 392,521 18,301,051 $ 17,437,329 17,437,329 $ CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 8,532,550 42,792 7,735 1,393,454 43,014,134 180,203 53,170,868 $ 10,566,000 157,500 59,500 448,050 47,977,000 57,299 198,000 59,463,349 $ 10,414,328 157,500 71,275 427,991 48,128,678 255,138 160 59,455,070 $ 7,251,000 50,230,031 1,559,217 59,040,248 $ $ 5,911,000 157,500 59,500 448,050 52,914,000 57,299 198,000 59,745,349 $ TOTAL USES $ 85,536,902 $ 96,884,484 $ 96,948,183 $ 96,857,985 $ 95,962,288 $ $ $ $ $ 10,933,300 328,768 31,300 3,434,687 42,204 (2,229,687) (13,269,892) (729,320) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -332.9% -4.4% 1,945,595 243,812 164,700 (1,924,384) 429,723 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -632.7% 16.2% 214,467 100.0% 13,799,463 100.0% 350,104 100.0% 216,700 100.0% 2,797,454 100.0% 0.0% 55,485 100.0% 126,093 100.0% 23,500 100.0% 345,518 100.0% (21,585) 100.0% (17,044,808) -4342.4% 862,391 4.7% $ 3,315,000 157,500 59,500 448,050 (2,253,031) 57,299 (1,361,217) 423,101 985,895 31.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% -4.7% 100.0% -687.5% 0.0% 1.0% Sources and Uses by Fund FY 2006-07 ACTUAL FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED % VARIANCE FY 2008-09 ADOPTED SOURCES 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 55,128,752 55,128,752 $ $ 58,628,253 58,628,253 $ $ 58,357,554 58,357,554 $ $ 58,357,554 58,357,554 $ $ 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ $ 1,261,904 1,261,904 2.2% 2.2% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ $ 87,574,992 87,574,992 $ $ 91,523,997 91,523,997 $ $ 91,523,997 91,523,997 $ $ 92,901,158 92,901,158 $ $ 83,485,778 83,485,778 $ $ (8,038,219) (8,038,219) -8.8% -8.8% TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE $ 87,574,992 $ 91,523,997 $ 91,523,997 $ 92,901,158 $ 83,485,778 $ 980 - ELIMINATIONS $ TOTAL FUNDS $ (55,128,752) $ 87,651,594 $ (58,628,253) $ 91,523,997 $ (58,357,554) $ 91,523,997 $ (58,357,554) $ 92,901,158 $ (44,709,458) $ 98,395,778 $ (8,038,219) -8.8% 13,648,096 6,871,781 -23.4% 7.5% USES 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 53,647,924 53,647,924 $ $ 61,000,000 61,000,000 $ $ 60,793,000 60,793,000 $ $ 60,793,008 60,793,008 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ 793,000 793,000 1.3% 1.3% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ $ 86,941,128 86,941,128 $ $ 94,512,737 94,512,737 $ $ 94,512,737 94,512,737 $ $ 94,422,531 94,422,531 $ $ 80,671,746 80,671,746 $ $ 13,840,991 13,840,991 14.6% 14.6% TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE $ 86,941,128 $ 94,512,737 $ 94,512,737 $ 94,422,531 $ 80,671,746 $ 13,840,991 14.6% (13,648,096) 985,895 23.4% 1.0% 980 - ELIMINATIONS $ TOTAL FUNDS $ (55,128,752) $ 85,536,902 $ (58,628,253) $ 96,884,484 $ 6 (58,357,554) $ 96,948,183 $ (58,357,554) $ 96,857,985 $ (44,709,458) $ 95,962,288 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds Sources of Funds $98,395,778 Miscellaneous & Interest 9% Permits, Fees & Fines 1% Other Intergovernmental & Grants 15% Property Taxes, Penalties & Interest 75% Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $95,962,288 Flood Hazard Regulation 3% Information Technology 3% Administrative Services 4% Flood Hazard Education 1% Flood Hazard Identification 11% Flood Hazard Remediation 78% 7 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Budget Summary Consolidated Budget by Fund Type FLOOD DISTRICT FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET BEG. UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. SPECIAL DEBT SERVICE FUND TYPE: CAPITAL SUBTOTAL Value $ 18,339,252 $ 15,525,220 $ (2,814,032) $ - SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAX ES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL OPERTING SOURCES $ 74,096,526 $ 746,000 133,384 900,000 1,009,868 76,885,778 $ - $ - $ 6,600,000 6,600,000 $ - $ $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING USES $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NO N-RECURRING USES $ ELIMINATIONS TOTAL $ - $ 15,525,220 - $ - $ 74,096,526 $ 746,000 133,384 900,000 1,009,868 76,885,778 $ - $ $ 74,096,526 746,000 133,384 900,000 1,009,868 76,885,778 $ 14,910,000 $ 44,709,458 59,619,458 $ 14,910,000 $ 6,600,000 44,709,458 66,219,458 $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ 14,910,000 6,600,000 21,510,000 - $ 59,619,458 (44,709,458) $ 98,395,778 14,737,201 $ 2,228,541 17,437,329 1,559,217 35,962,288 $ - $ - $ 44,709,458 44,709,458 $ - $ TOTAL USES $ 80,671,746 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 40,923,490 ENDING UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ NON-RECURRING OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TO TAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 83,485,778 $ $ $ 143,105,236 $ - $ - $ 14,737,201 2,228,541 17,437,329 1,559,217 35,962,288 $ $ - $ $ 14,737,201 2,228,541 17,437,329 1,559,217 35,962,288 $ 2,518,969 $ 57,481,031 60,000,000 $ 2,518,969 $ 57,481,031 44,709,458 104,709,458 $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ 2,518,969 57,481,031 60,000,000 - $ 60,000,000 $ 140,671,746 $ (44,709,458) $ 95,962,288 $ - $ - $ 40,923,490 $ - $ 40,923,490 - $ - $ 17,958,710 $ 17,958,710 $ - $ 17,958,710 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rates. Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Fiscal Year 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 12,361,851 13,660,618 15,504,112 17,485,890 19,544,069 21,174,169 24,140,629 26,585,248 29,605,196 32,778,027 45,937,945 54,751,263 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.3425 0.3270 0.2858 0.2534 0.2319 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2047 0.1533 0.1367 Tax Levy 38,118,477 42,339,342 44,670,223 44,310,754 45,042,553 45,322,696 44,165,629 50,550,367 62,733,411 67,096,622 70,422,870 74,674,333 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. The schedule at the left lists the District secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last eleven fiscal years, plus the assessed value and the preliminary tax rate for FY 2008-09. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate was reduced to $0.1367 per $100 net assessed value, a difference of ($0.0166) from FY 2007-08. As reflected in the graph below, the tax rate has steadily declined over the past decade, while the secondary net assessed value has more than quadrupled. Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $60,000 $0.4000 $0.3500 $0.3000 $40,000 $0.2500 $30,000 $0.2000 $0.1500 $20,000 $0.1000 $10,000 $0.0500 $0 $0.0000 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Fiscal Year 9 06 07 08 09 * Projected Actual Tax Rate NAV (Millions) $50,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FY 2008-09 estimated revenues of $74,096,526 are based on an historical collection rate of 99.0%, and are an increase of $4,413,411 (6.3%) from the FY 2007-08 Adopted budget. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2008-09 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVY Flood Control District Levy Description Salt River Proj. Net Effective Net Assessed Value Assessed Value FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: FY 2008-09 Preliminary $ 54,751,262,830 FY 2007-08 Adopted 45,937,944,910 FY 2006-07 Adopted 32,778,027 $ 97,574,499 97,574,499 90,480,096 Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1-cent Levy Tax Rates Property Tax Levy $ 54,848,837,329 46,035,519,409 $ 32,868,507,458 $ 5,484,884 4,603,552 3,286,851 $ 0.1367 0.1533 0.2047 $ 74,844,976 70,422,870 67,096,622 SRP Payments in Lieu of Taxes(PILT) $ 133,384 149,582 185,213 Total Tax Levy & PILT $ 74,978,360 70,572,452 67,281,835 Levy Limit FY 2008-09 Flood Control District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 70,422,870 71,831,327 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 52,533,779,423 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 54,626,432,391 D. Recommended Calculation D3. Recommended Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Divided by 100) D5. Recommended Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.1367 74,674,333 4,251,463 6.0% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 52,042,509,188 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 491,270,235 $ 52,533,779,423 10 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Property tax collection is budgeted in FY 2008-09 at the approximate historical average of 99.0%, rather than the actual levy amount. The graph below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2008-09. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2008-09 $ Levy Amount 70,422,870 Estimated Collections $ 68,326,743 Collection Rate 99.0% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, 3.0 and licenses. Rates for 2.5 licenses and permits are approved by the Board of 2.0 Directors, unless 1.5 otherwise set forth in 1.0 statute. The revenue generated from licenses 0.5 and permits is used to 0.0 offset the cost of issuing 2007 2008* 2009** the permits. The chart to * Projected Actual ** Budget the left shows FY 2006-07 actual, FY 2007-08 projected, and FY 2008-09 budgeted revenue for this category. For FY 2008-09, the District is projecting fewer requests for licenses and permits resulting in reduced revenue. $ (Millions) Licenses and Permit Revenue Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are amounts received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2008-09 payments in lieu of taxes. The recent decline in revenue is reflective of decline in the District’s secondary property tax rate. Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2002-03 $ 136,905 2003-04 152,557 2004-05 196,239 2005-06 191,727 2006-07 199,736 2007-08* 149,582 2008-09** 133,384 * Projected Actual ** Budget 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The following table compares FY 2007-08 and FY 2008-09 budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenue FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 Increase/ Adopted Recommended (Decrease) Jurisdiction City of Phoenix $ 1,212,000 $ 30,000 $ (1,182,000) Town of Wickenburg 50,000 25,000 (25,000) City of Peoria 2,350,000 2,350,000 City of Mesa 1,678,000 5,536,000 3,858,000 Federal NRCS 5,254,000 4,860,000 (394,000) Maricopa Water District 439,000 439,000 ADOT 224,000 224,000 Multiple Jurisdictions 8,318,874 1,446,000 (6,872,874) Total $ 16,512,874 $ 14,910,000 $ (1,602,874) Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales, and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. Flood Control District Miscellaneous Revenue $15.0 (millions) $12.0 $9.0 $6.0 $3.0 Listed to the left are the miscellaneous revenues, other than bond proceeds, recorded for fiscal years 2002-03 through 2006-07. Note that revenues in Fiscal Year 2002-03 include the sale of land, which is non-recurring in nature. $- 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s capital improvement program. The reduction in the Fiscal Year 2008-09 fund transfer reflects a $17 million reallocation of intergovernmental revenues directly to Capital Projects Fund (990). 12 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Fund Transfers $70 (millions) $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2009** * Projected **Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Fund designations are explained in greater detail later in this section. A list of fund balance designations is provided below, as well. Estimated beginning fund balances for FY 2008-09 are based on audited actual fund balances at the end of FY 2005-06, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning Fund Balance Summary FLOOD DISTRICT ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2008-09 SOURCES: FUND UNDESIG. BEG. FUND BALANCE NON RECURRING OPERATING SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER 991 FLOOD CONTROL (2,814,032) SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ (2,814,032) $ 76,885,778 76,885,778 $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 18,339,252 CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 18,339,252 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 15,525,220 $ 76,885,778 $ $ 13 USES: NON RECURRING OPERATING 6,600,000 6,600,000 $ 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ - $ (44,709,458) $ - $ 21,510,000 $ 35,962,288 35,962,288 $ 35,962,288 $ UNDESIG. ENDING FUND BALANCE STRUCTURAL BALANCE 44,709,458 44,709,458 $ 40,923,490 40,923,490 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ - 17,958,710 $ 17,958,710 ( 44,709,458) $ - $ 60,000,000 $ 40,923,490 $ - - $ 17,958,710 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Designations The following schedule lists amounts designated within the estimated balance of the Flood Control District’s operating fund. Designations are the District’s self-imposed limitations on financial resources that would otherwise be available for use. The fund balance designation is for budget stabilization to ensure that sufficient cash is set aside to cover shortfalls during the fiscal year due to the property tax collection cycle. FY 2008-09 Fund Balance Designations Fund/Designation Flood Control District (Fund 991) Budget Stabilization: Cash Flow/Property Tax FY 2007-08 $ 3,200,000 FY 2008-09 12,500,000 $ (Inc.)/Dec. (9,300,000) (1) (1) Based on the estimated amount needed to eliminate the need for Tax Anticipation Notes or other forms of short-term borrowing to finance current operations. Designation amount decreasing because of increased fund balance. 14 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 94,512,737 $ 91,523,997 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 94,512,737 $ 91,523,997 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Property Taxes Reallocate IGA Revenue to Capital Projects Fund (990) Increase in Transfer to Capital Projects Fund (990) Public Communications Market Study One-Time Carefree Non-Capital Flood Proofing Restatement to Non-Operating - Fund Transfer to Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) $ Subtotal $ FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET - $ (17,042,874) 1,617,564 14,107 (207,000) 4,413,411 (17,042,874) - (42,932,244) (58,550,447) $ (12,629,463) $ 35,962,290 $ 78,894,534 $ $ Subtotal $ - $ (1,496,900) (1,137,000) (400,000) (400,000) (30,140) (3,464,040) FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 35,962,290 $ 75,430,494 RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS Forecasted Property Tax Revenue Forecasted Payments in Lieu of Taxes $ - $ REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Request Below Target for Property Tax Reduction in Licenses and Permits Review Requests One Time Revenue - Sand and Gravel Litigation Reduction in Orthophotography Reduction in Sale of Fixed Assets Subtotal $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ $ 1,496,900 (41,616) 1,455,284 35,962,290 $ 0.0% 76,885,778 -2.5% NON-OPERATING NON-OPERATING 0001 Sale of Spook Hill and Other Excess Land Restatement from Operating - Fund Transfer to Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Increase in Fund Transfer to Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) FY 2008-09 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET 15 $ - $ 6,600,000 Subtotal $ 42,932,244 1,777,214 44,709,458 $ 6,600,000 $ 44,709,458 $ 6,600,000 $ 80,671,748 $ 83,485,778 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District EXPENDITURES REVENUE NON-OPERATING NON-OPERATING 0001 Transfer in from the Flood Control Operations Fund (991) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F022 - City of Chandler F026 - City of Phoenix F035 - Town of Guadalupe F117 - South Phoenix Drainage Improvements F121 - East Maricopa Floodway F126 - Salt/Gila River F201 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 F202 - McMicken Dam F207 - Buckeye FRS No. 1 F211 - Buckeye/Sun Valley ADMP F300 - Spook Hill FRS and Outlet F310 - Powerline FRS F343 - Wickenburg ADMP F344 - Wittmann ADMP F346 - Aguila F371 - Upper New River ADMP F400 - Skunk Creek and New River F420 - Spook Hill ADMP F442 - East Mesa ADMP F450 - Glendale/Peoria ADMP F470 - White Tanks ADMP F480 - Queen Creek ADMP F491 - Higley ADMP F565 - Durango ADMP F580 - ACDC ADMP F590 - Scatter Wash Channel F620 - Maryvale ADMP F625 - Metro ADMP FCPR - Flood Control Project Reserve FY 2008-09 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET 16 $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 44,709,458 44,709,458 $ $ Subtotal $ 515,000 515,000 5,000 1,188,000 5,690,000 1,020,000 780,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 32,000 580,000 2,989,000 710,000 60,000 55,000 10,000 7,455,000 4,289,000 4,962,000 17,283,000 1,219,000 2,210,000 2,370,000 958,000 5,000 2,180,000 430,000 2,430,000 60,000,000 $ 25,000 1,900,000 3,636,000 2,350,000 5,523,000 30,000 1,446,000 14,910,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 59,619,458 $ 60,000,000 $ 59,619,458 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by state statutes and as directed by the District’s General Policies under District Resolutions 88-08 and 88-08A. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Significance within a master plan • Hydrologic/hydraulic significance • Level of protection • Area protected • Environmental quality • Area-wide benefit • Total project cost • Level of partner participation • Operation and maintenance costs • Operation and maintenance responsibility The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 28 capital projects are identified and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The adopted projects are as follows: 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS PREVIOUS ACDC ADMP $ 33,027,127 BUCKEYE #1 12,811 BUCKEYE/SUN VALLEY ADMP 5,323 CITY OF CHANDLER 4,974,398 DURANGO ADMP 13,666,218 EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY 54,511,068 EAST MESA ADMP 32,410,484 GLENDALE/PEORIA ADMP 53,036,862 HASSAYAMPA RIVER 25,342 HIGLEY ADMP 5,060,752 MARYVALE ADMP 73,792,114 MCMICKEN DAM 12,017,866 METRO ADMP 781,792 PHOENIX DAM SAFETY PROGRAM POWERLINE FRS QUEEN CREEK ADMP 13,421,073 S PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 35,339,791 SALT/GILA RIVER 1,916,040 SCATTER WASH CHANNEL 1,513,313 SKUNK CREEK/NEW RIVER 68,324,088 SPOOK HILL ADMP 8,320,825 SPOOK HILL FRS 176,281 TOWN OF GUADALUPE 8,650,487 UPPER NEW RIVER 649,805 WHITE TANKS ADMP 74,981,588 WHITE TANKS DAM #4 2,248,560 WICKENBURG ADMS 6,618,062 WITTMAN ADMP 253,186 PROJECT RESERVES (FLOOD) TOTAL FUND 990 $ 505,735,256 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 $ 1,220,000 10,000 12,000 10,000 1,366,000 27,000 1,394,000 10,292,000 371,000 19,000 1,291,000 833,000 2,996,000 85,000 6,064,000 1,211,000 50,000 1,016,000 11,000 465,000 109,000 1,000 432,000 22,452,000 87,000 6,721,000 2,000 1,433,000 $ 59,980,000 FY 2008-09 $ 958,000 20,000 20,000 515,000 2,370,000 5,690,000 4,289,000 4,962,000 60,000 2,210,000 2,180,000 20,000 430,000 515,000 580,000 1,219,000 1,188,000 1,020,000 5,000 10,000 7,455,000 32,000 5,000 55,000 17,283,000 780,000 2,989,000 710,000 2,430,000 $ 60,000,000 FY 2009-10 $ 1,080,000 15,000 1,215,000 7,796,000 2,955,000 9,360,000 1,580,000 4,461,000 1,580,000 1,445,000 5,000 1,650,000 60,000 10,000 1,115,000 5,601,000 9,900,000 6,160,000 1,015,000 1,015,000 1,982,000 $ 60,000,000 18 FY 2010-11 $ 8,250,000 6,020,000 1,215,000 2,170,000 6,010,000 2,650,000 6,915,000 3,480,000 40,000 4,350,000 10,000 1,620,000 855,000 2,240,000 6,142,000 3,270,000 515,000 515,000 3,733,000 $ 60,000,000 FY 2011-12 $ 8,250,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 20,000 60,000 9,250,000 7,950,000 30,000 4,210,000 1,064,000 2,160,000 8,397,000 14,150,000 515,000 515,000 3,349,000 $ 60,000,000 FY 2012-13 $ 8,250,000 60,000 5,200,000 20,000 4,200,000 8,250,000 4,210,000 10,000 21,720,000 4,250,000 1,015,000 1,015,000 1,800,000 $ 60,000,000 5-YEAR TOTAL (FY 2009-13) $ 958,000 25,850,000 6,065,000 2,955,000 12,456,000 19,875,000 16,379,000 26,907,000 60,000 2,210,000 18,071,000 9,890,000 6,255,000 520,000 2,240,000 11,319,000 3,117,000 1,020,000 5,000 1,125,000 17,466,000 32,000 5,000 55,000 63,442,000 28,610,000 6,049,000 3,770,000 13,294,000 $ 300,000,000 TOTAL PROJECT 35,205,127 25,872,811 6,082,323 7,939,398 27,488,218 74,413,068 50,183,484 90,235,862 456,342 7,289,752 93,154,114 22,740,866 10,032,792 605,000 2,240,000 30,804,073 39,667,791 2,986,040 2,534,313 69,460,088 26,251,825 317,281 8,656,487 1,136,805 160,875,588 30,945,560 19,388,062 4,025,186 14,727,000 $ 865,715,256 $ Page 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 75 77 80 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Managing for Results Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Program Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported • Capital Projects Result Measures Measure RESULT: Percent of Capital Dollars Expended FY 2007-08 Year-To-Date Actual 52% FY 2007-08 YearEnd Projected 92% FY 2008-09 Projected 96% District CIP Managing for Results (MfR) are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 608.5 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP; projects planned for fiscal year 2009 completion will benefit 106.6 square miles. 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC)/ Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F580.07.31 3 F580.07.31 F580.07.31 F580.07.31 F580.05.31 - T3N/R3E - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2009 Project Description: F580.07.31 – 9th Avenue Storm Drain The 9th Avenue Storm Drain Project was identified within the Sunnyslope Candidate Assessment Report as one of several storm drains required in the Sunnyslope area to prevent local flooding during smaller events. The City of Phoenix has received numerous drainage complaints from the area. The City requested that the District initiate a drainage study to identify drainage problems and recommend solutions. The project, starting at Peoria Avenue along 9th Avenue and ending at the Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC), consists of a storm drain system of pipe sizes ranging from 24" to 78", inlet and outlet structures and catch basins. The project will provide a 10-year level of flood protection to the properties located in the watershed. The City is the lead agency for design and construction of the project, and the District has entered into a fifty percent construction cost share agreement. Construction is in progress with an estimated completion date in Fiscal Year 2009. The City will own, operate and maintain the completed storm drain system. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 20 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 25,936,140 IGA - Phoenix 7,090,987 Project Total $ 33,027,127 Projected Year 1 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 $ (46,000) $ 958,000 1,266,000 $ 1,220,000 $ 958,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 21 $ $ 5-Year Total 958,000 958,000 Total Project $ 26,848,140 8,356,987 $ 35,205,127 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Buckeye Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 1 Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F207.01.31 4 F207.01.31 F207.01.31 F207.01.31 F207.01.31 - T1N/R3W, T1N/R4W, T1N/R5W - Flood Control District NRCS (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: F207.01.31 - Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. It is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Since its original construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance, under Public Law 106-472, for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. Buckeye FRS No.1 has been identified as a major component of the proposed Maricopa Regional Trail Phase 3 Master Plan. Ongoing project planning includes coordination with stakeholders for the potential incorporation of a recreational federal cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Design is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 12,811 IGA - Pending Project Total $ 12,811 Projected FY 07-08 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,080,000 $ 1,080,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 7,250,000 1,000,000 $ 8,250,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 4,250,000 4,000,000 $ 8,250,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 4,250,000 4,000,000 $ 8,250,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 23 5-Year Total $ 16,850,000 9,000,000 $ 25,850,000 Total Project $ 16,872,811 9,000,000 $ 25,872,811 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Buckeye / Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F211.03.31 4 F211.03.31 F211.03.31 F211.03.31 F211.03.31 - T1S/R3W - Town of Buckeye Town of Buckeye Town of Buckeye FY 2012 Project Description: F211.03.31 - Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (MC 85) with increasingly intense flood conditions to Beloat Road. The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year conveyance system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety, and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. The project’s IGA commits the District to provide 50 percent reimbursement to the Town of Buckeye (the project’s lead agency) no earlier than Fiscal Year 2011, by which time construction is expected to be complete. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 5,323 Project Total $ 5,323 $ $ Projected FY 07-08 12,000 12,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 08-09 20,000 20,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 09-10 15,000 15,000 24 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 6,020,000 6,020,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 6,065,000 6,065,000 $ $ Total Project 6,082,323 6,082,323 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District City of Chandler Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F022.01.32 3 F022.01.32 F022.01.32 F022.01.32 F022.01.32 - T1S/R5E - City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler FY 2012 Project Description: F022.01.32 - Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project (SRP) “Chandler Drain” irrigation tailwater system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a flat four square mile segment of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. Project elements include numerous catch basins and a total of 2.8 miles of drainage pipes. Total project cost is estimated at $5.5 million, and the District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement with the City of Chandler, the project’s prospective lead agency. A resolution and IGA are required. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for Fiscal Year 2009, and construction is expected to be complete by Fiscal Year 2011. The project may be broken into up to four phases depending on District and City funding availability. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 4,974,398 Project Total $ 4,974,398 $ $ Projected FY 07-08 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 08-09 515,000 515,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 09-10 1,215,000 1,215,000 26 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 1,215,000 1,215,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 2,955,000 2,955,000 $ $ Total Project 7,939,398 7,939,398 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 27 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Durango Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F565.04.31 - T1N/R1E, T1N/R2E F565.04.32 - T1N/R1E, T1N/R2E 5 F565.04.31 - Flood Control District, City of Phoenix F565.04.32 - Flood Control District, City of Avondale F565.04.31 - City of Phoenix F565.04.32 - City of Avondale (Projected / Unapproved) F565.04.31 - City of Phoenix F565.04.32 - City of Avondale F565.04.31 - FY 2011 F565.04.32 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: F565.04.31 - 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel The 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) was recommended by the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) and was requested by the City of Phoenix. The project will provide an interim regional outfall channel and is the first phase of the DRCC Project. Project improvements will reduce flooding hazards north of the Union Pacific Railroad and remove approximately 71 structures from an identified floodplain. The City is the lead agency for design of both the storm drain and the DRCC and is the lead agency for storm drain construction which began in Fiscal Year 2006. The District will be the lead agency for construction of the first phase of the DRCC, scheduled to begin in early Fiscal Year 2010. F565.04.32 - Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria) The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Channel to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the Fiscal Year 2003 Prioritization Procedure, and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. The District and the City are pursuing cost-share commitment from area developers, and project implementation will likely await this commitment. 28 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 11,166,618 IGA - Phoenix 2,499,600 Project Total $ 13,666,218 Projected FY 07-08 $ 1,294,000 72,000 $ 1,366,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,340,000 30,000 $ 2,370,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 6,636,000 1,160,000 $ 7,796,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 1,010,000 1,160,000 $ 2,170,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 29 5-Year Total $ 10,106,000 2,350,000 $ 12,456,000 Total Project $ 22,566,618 4,921,600 $ 27,488,218 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District EMF (East Maricopa Floodway) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F121.03.32 F121.03.33 1 F121.03.32 F121.03.33 F121.03.32 F121.03.33 F121.03.32 F121.03.33 F121.03.32 F121.03.33 - T1S/R6E - T2S/R6E - Flood Control District Flood Control District Town of Gilbert None Flood Control District Flood Control District FY 2012 Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: F121.03.32 - Rittenhouse Basin The District’s East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF’s 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Rittenhouse Basin construction is being accomplished in multiple phases. Design and the first phase of construction have been completed, and the second phase of construction is expected to be completed during Fiscal Year 2010. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, the Town of Gilbert will fund recreational amenities and assume certain operations and maintenance responsibilities. The project IGA requires the Town to purchase an easement on the 40-acre excavated basin site within six months of project completion at a value equal to approximately fifty percent of the appraised fair market value. F121.03.33 - Chandler Heights Basin Chandler Heights Basin addresses flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction are complete, and the third phase of construction is tentatively scheduled for Fiscal Year 2011. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operations and maintenance obligations in the future. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. 30 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 54,311,068 IGA 200,000 Project Total $ 54,511,068 Projected FY 07-08 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 5,690,000 $ 5,690,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 2,955,000 $ 2,955,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 6,010,000 $ 6,010,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 5,200,000 $ 5,200,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 31 5-Year Total $ 19,875,000 $ 19,875,000 Total Project $ 74,213,068 200,000 $ 74,413,068 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District East Mesa Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F442.11.31 F442.12.31 1, 2 F442.11.31 F442.12.31 F442.11.31 F442.12.31 F442.11.31 F442.12.31 F442.11.31 F442.12.31 - T1S/R7E, T1S/R8E - T1N/R7E - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - City of Mesa - None – Flood Control District, City of Mesa - Flood Control District - Outside Five-Year CIP - FY 2010 Project Description: F442.11.31 - Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements The Siphon Draw project is the final element of the recommended plan for the East Mesa ADMP for the area south of the Superstition Freeway and north of Warner Road. The project includes a channel along Meridian Road that intercepts flow entering Maricopa County from Pinal County and conveys the flow south to a detention basin to be constructed east of Meridian Road and north of Elliot Road. A storm drain will be constructed along Elliot Road to convey flow from the basin to the existing storm drain at Elliot Road and 104th Avenue. Construction of the storm drain and basin is anticipated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009 with the City of Mesa as a project partner. Construction of the channel along Meridian Road will follow, pending partnering agreements. F442.12.31 - East Mesa Drain Reaches 4 and 7 Modification In June 1994, the District assumed maintenance responsibility (previously held by Maricopa County Public Works Department) for the East Mesa Drains, 11 dedicated local drainage easements in Unincorporated Maricopa County. The District conducted a Candidate Assessment Report (CAR) in April 2004 to investigate improvement alternatives to mitigate the extensive maintenance costs associated with the drains. The consensus of the District identified Reaches 4 and 7 as the best targets for structural improvements to decrease maintenance costs. The bottom and side slopes of the Reach 4 channel have experienced scour erosion maintenance complications associated with trees and trash; the Reach 7 channel has experienced chronic erosion from inflows across its east bank. The project will be unilateral and will likely include installation of concrete lining. Design will be completed by staff, and construction of Reach 7 improvements will begin in Fiscal Year 2009. 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 25,430,115 IGA -Mesa, Pending 6,980,369 Project Total $ 32,410,484 Projected FY 07-08 $ 946,000 448,000 $ 1,394,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 653,000 3,636,000 $ 4,289,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 6,120,000 3,240,000 $ 9,360,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 1,300,000 1,350,000 $ 2,650,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 33 5-Year Total $ 8,153,000 8,226,000 $ 16,379,000 Total Project $ 34,529,115 15,654,369 $ 50,183,484 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): County Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F450.02.32 – T4N/R1E F450.02.33 – T4N/R1E F450.05.30 – T3N/R1E, T3N/R2E F450.06.31 – T4N/R1E F450.08.31 – T4N/R1E F450.XX.X1 – T4N/R1E 4 F450.02.32 – City of Peoria F450.02.33 – Flood Control District F450.05.30 – City of Glendale F450.06.31 – TBD (City of Peoria or Flood Control District) F450.08.31 – City of Peoria F450.XX.X1 – TBD (City of Peoria or Flood Control District) F450.02.32 – City of Peoria F450.02.33 – City of Peoria, Public Works F450.05.30 – City of Glendale F450.06.31 – City of Peoria (Pending/Unapproved) F450.08.31 – City of Peoria (Pending/Unapproved) F450.XX.X1 – City of Peoria (Pending/Unapproved) F450.02.32 – City of Peoria F450.02.33 – City of Peoria, Public Works F450.05.30 – City of Glendale F450.06.31 – City of Peoria F450.08.31 – City of Peoria F450.XX.X1 – City of Peoria F450.02.32 – FY 2010 F450.02.33 – FY 2009 F450.05.30 – FY 2010 F450.06.31 – FY 2012 F450.08.31 – FY 2013 F450.XX.X1 – FY 2014 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Description: F450.02.32 - Rose Garden Lane Channel The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update Study (G/P ADMP) in May 2001 which made several recommendations for regional drainage infrastructure to provide 100year protection for the G/P ADMP watershed. The Rose Garden Lane Channel is a high priority recommendation of the G/P ADMP and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The City Council of Peoria adopted the recommendations of the G/P ADMP in May 2001, and the Board of Directors for the District adopted the G/P ADMP recommendations in December 2001 (Resolution FCD 2001R012). The project involves construction of an open channel along the north side of Rose Garden Lane and will provide a 100-year level of protection for an area between approximately Lake Pleasant Road and the Agua Fria River, south of Rose Garden Lane. The channel will accept flows that currently flow over Rose Garden Lane and overflow the Beardsley Channel and convey them to the Agua Fria River. Intergovernmental agreements between the District and the City of Peoria are in place for the design and construction of the project. The City is the lead agency for all tasks, and construction is expected to be complete by Fiscal Year 2009. F450.02.33 - 83rd Avenue / Pinnacle Peak Road Improvements The 83rd Avenue / Pinnacle Peak Road Drainage Improvements Project is a high priority recommendation of the Glendale/Peoria (G/P) ADMP and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. Resolution FCD 2001R012 authorized the District to cost share in the project, and to undertake project design, land and rights-of-way (R/W) acquisitions, construction and construction management. The project includes two detention basins and a series of storm drains along Pinnacle Peak Road, 83rd Avenue and nearby residential streets. Improvements will provide a 100-year level of protection benefits to an area between approximately 83rd and 87th Avenue, and south of Calle Lejos (one-half mile north of Pinnacle Peak Road); a 10-year level of protection will be provided to an area between 87th and 91st Avenues south of Cielo Grande and Pinnacle Peak Road. The project will tie in to existing infrastructure on the east side of 83rd Avenue, south of Williams Road. The District is the lead agency for all tasks, with the City of Peoria as a project partner. Construction will be substantially completed in Fiscal Year 2008. The City and Public Works will own, operate and maintain the completed project. F450.05.30 - 67th Avenue Storm Drain The City of Glendale is the lead agency for this project, which will provide 10-year storm drainage protection for a three-square-mile area lying within jurisdictional boundaries of both the cities of Glendale and Peoria. The project will consist of drainage pipes and catch basins, and will be constructed in rights-of-way provided by the City of Glendale. The outfalls for the project were constructed by the District along 67th Avenue and Cactus Road, and 67th Avenue and Olive Avenue, and are owned and operated by the City of Peoria. The District is contributing 50 percent of the project cost, estimated to be $3 million. The City of Glendale will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The first phase of the project is complete and involved the installation of 200 feet of storm drain at the intersection of 67th and Peoria Avenue. The remaining storm drain design and construction along 67th Avenue from Cactus Road to the Arizona Canal Diversion Channel is scheduled to be completed in Fiscal Year 2009. F450.06.31 - Pinnacle Peak Road Channel (89th Avenue to the Agua Fria River) The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale / Peoria ADMP Update study to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMP Update recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from 89th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The recommended project will capture and convey 100-year storm flows in a series of open channels and culverts along the north side of Pinnacle Peak Road from approximately 89th Avenue to the river; it will also provide roadway improvements along this alignment. The City of Peoria and Public Works are anticipated project partners. The District and the City of Peoria are re-evaluating elements of this project, based on potential mitigation by pending area development; and cost savings may result. A project resolution and an IGA are required. F450.08.31 – Pinnacle Peak Road / 67th Avenue Drainage Improvements The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale / Peoria ADMP Update Study to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The G/P ADMP Update recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from the New River to 67th Avenue, north to Hatfield Road. The recommended project will capture and convey 100-year storm flows from areas north of Pinnacle Peak Road and east of 67th Avenue, and discharge those flows to the New River. It will provide protection to existing, proposed and future developments downstream of Pinnacle Peak Road. The District anticipates partnering with the City of Peoria. A project resolution and IGA are required. F450.XX.X1 - Beardsley Road Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale / Peoria ADMP Update Study to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMP Update recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including this project, consisting of a channel and culvert system along Beardsley Road from approximately 107th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The District anticipates partnering with the City of Peoria in a 50 percent cost share, with the City being responsible for O&M responsibilities following construction. A project resolution and IGA are required. Construction will likely be completed outside the five-year CIP. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 45,862,424 IGA - Peoria, MCDOT, Pending 7,174,438 Project Total $ 53,036,862 Projected FY 07-08 $ 10,292,000 $ 10,292,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,612,000 2,350,000 $ 4,962,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,580,000 $ 1,580,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 2,915,000 4,000,000 $ 6,915,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 5,250,000 4,000,000 $ 9,250,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 37 5-Year Total $ 16,557,000 10,350,000 $ 26,907,000 Total Project $ 72,711,424 17,524,438 $ 90,235,862 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Hassayampa River Watercourse Master Plan (WCMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F346.07.39 4 F346.07.39 None F346.07.39 F346.07.39 - T1S/R5W - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - FY 2009 Project Description: F346.07.39 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Parker (APN 401-28004B) Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. The Parker property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2008 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates completing the purchase of the property in Fiscal Year 2008. Demolition, environmental surveys, and moving costs are expected in Fiscal Year 2009. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 25,342 Project Total $ 25,342 Projected FY 07-08 $ 371,000 $ 371,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 39 $ $ 5-Year Total 60,000 60,000 Total Project $ 456,342 $ 456,342 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Higley Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F491.04.31 1 F491.04.31 F491.04.31 F491.04.31 F491.04.31 - T2S/R5E - City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler FY 2009 Project Description: F491.04.31 - Queen Creek Road Basin The Queen Creek Road Basin was identified as one element of the recommended plan of the Higley ADMP. The off-line basin alleviates flooding problems along the eastern boundary of the Consolidated Canal as well as flooding to the west caused by possible overtopping of the canal from runoff generated within the study area. The completed basin will retain approximately 204 acre-feet of storage volume for up to a 100-year frequency storm event. The City of Chandler is the lead agency for project design and construction, and will own, operate and maintain the completed basin, with plans to develop it into a regional park. The District is participating in a cost-share IGA, with a contribution not to exceed $2.2 million. Design is in progress, and construction is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2009. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 4,902,623 IGA 158,129 Project Total $ 5,060,752 Projected FY 07-08 $ 19,000 $ 19,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,210,000 $ 2,210,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 41 $ $ 5-Year Total 2,210,000 2,210,000 Total Project $ 7,131,623 158,129 $ 7,289,752 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Maryvale Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F620.03.32 4, 5 F620.03.32 Glendale F620.03.32 F620.03.32 F620.03.32 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E - FCDMC, City of Phoenix, City of - City of Phoenix, City of Glendale - City of Phoenix, City of Glendale - FY 2012 Project Description: F620.03.32 - Bethany Home Outfall Channel The Bethany Home Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The project will have a 100-year capacity removing approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the project, extending west from the Agua Fria Freeway (Loop 101) to the New River along the Bethany Home Road alignment, has been completed by Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) with District participation. ADOT increased the size of their channel to accommodate additional flows from the east. Phase II of the project includes a channel from the Agua Fria Freeway alignment to 63rd Avenue. The ADMP also recommends 10-year capacity storm drains, located within Bethany Home Road and Camelback Road, extending from 59th Avenue to the Outfall Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the cost to construct this 100-year channel and 10-year storm drains is approximately $67 million. The cost share for the project is approximately fifty percent District, and 25 percent each for the Cities of Glendale and Phoenix. Construction of portions of the project from Loop 101 to 67th Avenue is completed. Design and construction of the remainder of the improvements will be phased over several years, with completion anticipated in 2012. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 42,120,267 IGA - Phoenix, Glendale 31,671,847 Project Total $ 73,792,114 Projected Year 1 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 $ (1,004,000) $ 734,000 2,295,000 1,446,000 $ 1,291,000 $ 2,180,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 2,593,000 1,868,000 $ 4,461,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 1,844,000 1,636,000 $ 3,480,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 4,837,000 3,113,000 $ 7,950,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 43 5-Year Total $ 10,008,000 8,063,000 $ 18,071,000 Total Project $ 51,124,267 42,029,847 $ 93,154,114 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District McMicken Dam Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F202.02.31 4 F202.02.31 None F202.02.31 F202.02.31 - T3N/R2W - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description F202.02.31 - McMicken Dam Project The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including: hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and canals such as Beardsley Canal. The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately 10 miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) which discharges to the Agua Fria River. The long-term ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has sought, and continues to seek, federal funding assistance for this project. Project planning will include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Design for the dam's rehabilitation or replacement is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2010, followed by construction several years thereafter. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 12,017,866 Project Total $ 12,017,866 Projected FY 07-08 $ 833,000 $ 833,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,580,000 $ 1,580,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ $ - Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 8,250,000 $ 8,250,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 45 $ $ 5-Year Total 9,890,000 9,890,000 Total Project $ 22,740,866 $ 22,740,866 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Metro Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F625.01.30 3 F625.01.30 F625.01.30 F625.01.30 F625.01.30 - T1N/R3E - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix 2011 Project Description: F625.01.30 – Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) The Fiscal Year 2008 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project involves drainage components along 1st Avenue (from Van Buren to Hadley Street); along Fillmore Street (from 9th Street to 3rd Avenue); along 3rd Avenue (from Fillmore Street to Interstate-10); and along Jefferson Street (from 19th Avenue to 10th Avenue). Specific components may be adjusted during final design to maximize efficiency. Phoenix has tentatively scheduled design for Fiscal Year 2009 and construction for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011. Phoenix will act as lead agency for project design and construction, and the District intends to contribute 50 percent of the project cost. An IGA is required. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 781,792 Project Total $ 781,792 Projected FY 07-08 $ 2,996,000 $ 2,996,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 430,000 $ 430,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,445,000 $ 1,445,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 47 $ $ 5-Year Total 6,255,000 6,255,000 Total Project $ 10,032,792 $ 10,032,792 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District City of Phoenix/Dam Safety Program Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F026.01.30 3 F026.01.30 F026.01.30 F026.01.30 F026.01.30 - T3N/R3E - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2010 Project Description: F026.01.30 - City of Phoenix Dam No. 7 Rehabilitation The City of Phoenix owns and operates four flood control dams that are of sufficient height and storage capacity to be classified as jurisdictional by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR): Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7, East Park Dam, West Park Dam and North Mountain Flood Detention Dam No. 3. Safety assessments of these dams performed by the City under IGA FCD2004A018 recommended rehabilitation of Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7 and implementation of minor dam safety improvements of the remaining jurisdictional dams. Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7, located in the North Mountain Preserve, provides flood protection to downstream areas for up to the 100-year flood event. This earth embankment dam is about 1,000 feet in length with a maximum height of 31 feet and a storage capacity of 120 acre-feet. An ungated low level drain pipe (primary outlet) through the dam releases floodwaters captured in the impoundment at a rate of about 50 cubic feet per second (cfs) to downstream areas. Dam rehabilitation, planned for Fiscal Year 2009, will include adding central filter into the existing earth dam, repair work of the dam embankment, and removal of existing trees and large tree roots in accordance with current dam safety practices. A new trash rack will also be installed on the primary outlet of each of the four City jurisdictional dams. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 07-08 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 49 $ $ 5-Year Total 520,000 520,000 Total Project $ 605,000 $ 605,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Powerline Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F310.XX.X1 1 F310.XX.X1 None F310.XX.X1 F310.XX.X1 - T1S/R8E - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - FY 2011 Project Description: F310.XX.X1 - Powerline FRS Repairs The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS causing the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Geotechnical field investigations are ongoing to determine if one or multiple earth fissures cross the dam and/or are located within the impoundment area of the dam. Appropriate flood alert inspection and warning procedures have been put in place for this site-specific condition at the dam. The District anticipates site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, will be required to assure the safety of the dam until its rehabilitation or replacement. Remedial work will likely include engineered, preventative updates to the dam design. Implementation is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 07-08 $ $ - Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 580,000 $ 580,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,650,000 $ 1,650,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 51 $ $ 5-Year Total 2,240,000 2,240,000 Total Project $ 2,240,000 $ 2,240,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Queen Creek Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F480.04.32 - T2S/R6E, T2S/R7E F480.04.34 - T2S/R7E F480.05.31 - T2S/R6E 1 F480.04.32 - Flood Control District F480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek F480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert F480.04.32 - Town of Queen Creek (Projected / Unapproved) F480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek (Projected / Unapproved) F480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert F480.04.32 - Town of Queen Creek F480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek F480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert F480.04.32 - FY 2012 F480.04.34 - Outside Five-Year CIP F480.05.31 - FY 2009 Project Description: F480.04.32 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights Road to Crismon Road) The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment along the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road east to Crismon Road. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow to prevent flooding to property adjacent to the wash. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the proposed 200-foot-wide channel. The Riggs Road to Crismon Road portion of Sonoqui Wash collects overland flow from the south and conveys it into the main branch of Sonoqui Wash. Advance right-of-way expenditures are scheduled for Fiscal Year 2009, to be followed by design and construction late in the five-year CIP. This is a joint project between the District and the Town of Queen Creek. The Town of Queen Creek is expected to act as the lead agency, and the Town will be responsible for channel operation and maintenance costs. An IGA between the Town and the District is required. F480.04.34 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Crismon Road to Empire Boulevard) The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes channelization from Riggs Road and Crismon Road, southeast to Empire Boulevard. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The District anticipates entering a 50-percent cost-share agreement with the Town of Queen Creek, identifying the Town as the project’s lead agency. Portions of the channelization will likely be accomplished through developers. An IGA between the Town and the District is required. F480.05.31 – Queen Creek Wash (Recker Road to Higley Road) The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash, from Recker Road to Higley Road, to complete channel improvements that have already been accomplished upstream of Recker and downstream of Higley. This project replaces the existing wash with a natural desert 100-year capacity channel. In accordance with the IGA, the Town is the lead agency for the project and will own, operate and maintain the completed project; the District’s cost share is limited to a cap of $1 million. Construction is in progress with completion anticipated in FY 2009. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 7,898,421 IGA - Gilbert, Queen Creek 5,522,652 Project Total $ 13,421,073 Projected FY 07-08 5,313,000 751,000 $ 6,064,000 $ Year 1 FY 08-09 1,219,000 $ 1,219,000 $ Year 2 FY 09-10 60,000 $ 60,000 $ Year 3 FY 10-11 1,120,000 500,000 $ 1,620,000 $ Year 4 FY 11-12 2,210,000 2,000,000 $ 4,210,000 $ Year 5 FY 12-13 2,210,000 2,000,000 $ 4,210,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 53 5-Year Total 6,819,000 4,500,000 $ 11,319,000 $ Total Project $ 20,030,421 10,773,652 $ 30,804,073 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District South Phoenix Drainage Improvement User Department: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC) F117.08.31 - T1S/R1E, T1S/R2E, T1N/R1E, T1N/R2E F117.09.31 - T1N/R2E 5 F117.08.31 - Flood Control District F117.09.31 - City of Phoenix F117.08.31 - City of Phoenix, SRP, Public Works F117.09.31 - City of Phoenix F117.08.31 - City of Phoenix, Flood Control District F117.09.31 - City of Phoenix, Flood Control District F117.08.31 - FY 2009 F117.09.31 - FY 2012 Project Description: F117.08.31 - Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (LACC) The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel is a public and private partnership that improved the Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility to reduce flooding in the Laveen area. The project consisted of 5.8 miles of conveyance channel and a detention basin at 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue. The District's project involvement is complete with the exception of several land acquisitions and construction of a swale, and the District will continue to maintain the project outfall. Landscaping by the City of Phoenix is ongoing to allow the channel and basin to function as City park facilities. F117.09.31 - 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Storm Drain and Detention Basin The 23rd Avenue / Roeser Road Storm Drain and Detention Basin is identified as an element for regional flood control infrastructure as defined by the recommended plan for the South Phoenix / Laveen Drainage Improvement Project. A proposed 10-acre detention basin, to be located on the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Roeser Road, will intercept flows from the north and the east. The Basin will be designed to intercept flows from a 100-year storm and will then discharge flows into a storm drain system to be constructed along Roeser Road to 27th Avenue from Roeser Road to Broadway Road where it will connect to an existing 108-inch storm drain that will convey the flows to the Salt River. The City of Phoenix is the lead agency for all project tasks, and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The City and the District are sharing equally in the project costs. Design is complete. Storm drain construction is planned for Fiscal Year 2009, and basin construction is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2011. 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Projected Funding Source Actuals FY 07-08 25,131,369 $ 1,120,000 Flood Control District Property Tax 10,208,422 IGA - City of Phoenix 91,000 Project Total $ 35,339,791 $ 1,211,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 1,188,000 $ 1,188,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 855,000 $ 855,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 1,064,000 $ 1,064,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 55 $ $ 5-Year Total 3,117,000 3,117,000 Total Project $ 29,368,369 10,299,422 $ 39,667,791 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Salt / Gila River Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F126.01.31 5 F126.01.31 Phoenix F126.01.31 F126.01.31 F126.01.31 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, City of - City of Phoenix - Flood Control District - FY 2009 Project Description: F126.01.31 - Tres Rios The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands; open water marshes and riparian corridors; and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2 million in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. The levee design and construction will occur in three phases - from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and 123rd to 137th Avenue. Design of the first two phases and construction of the first phase are complete, the second phase of construction is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2008, and construction of the third phase has not yet been scheduled. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 1,823,305 IGA 92,735 Project Total $ 1,916,040 Projected FY 07-08 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 1,020,000 $ 1,020,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 57 $ $ 5-Year Total 1,020,000 1,020,000 Total Project $ 2,893,305 92,735 $ 2,986,040 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Scatter Wash Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F590.03.31 3&4 F590.03.31 F590.03.31 F590.03.31 F590.03.31 - T4N/R2E - ADOT ADOT ADOT FY 2009 Project Description: F590.03.31 - Scatter Wash Basin Improvements The Scatter Wash Basin Improvement project originated from an Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) proposal and consists of improvements to Scatter Wash at the Interstate 17 crossing, channel improvements downstream of Interstate17, and construction of an off-line basin. The completed improvements will provide a 100-year level of protection. The District entered into an IGA with ADOT and the City of Phoenix to share 28 percent of the total project costs, not to exceed $1,008,000. ADOT is the lead agency for design, right-of-way acquisition and construction, and the City and ADOT will share operation and maintenance responsibilities for the channel and basin improvements. Project design and right-of-way acquisition are complete, and construction is underway. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 1,513,313 Project Total $ 1,513,313 Projected FY 07-08 $ 1,016,000 $ 1,016,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 59 $ $ 5-Year Total 5,000 5,000 Total Project $ 2,534,313 $ 2,534,313 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Skunk Creek and New River Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F400.06.31 4 F400.06.31 F400.06.31 F400.06.31 F400.06.31 - T3N/R1E, T4N/R1E - City of Peoria City of Peoria City of Peoria FY 2010 Project Description: F400.06.31 - New River (Grand Avenue to Skunk Creek, Including Paradise Shores) The Middle New River Watercourse Master Plan (MNRWCMP) study undertaken by the District identified projects to improve the conveyance capacity of the New River and provide bank protection. Improvements include channelization and bank protection for approximately two miles of the New River and an 800-foot reach on the west side of the New River south of Bell Road. With the City of Peoria as a project partner, construction has been completed with the exception of channelization at the Thunderbird Road crossing. The City of Peoria will act as the lead agency for construction at Thunderbird Road, to be conducted in conjunction with road improvements anticipated for Fiscal Year 2010. This is the last reach of the New River that has not yet been improved in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ “Phoenix, Arizona and Vicinity, including New River” project. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 64,703,473 IGA - Peoria 3,620,615 Project Total $ 68,324,088 Projected FY 07-08 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,115,000 $ 1,115,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 61 $ $ 5-Year Total 1,125,000 1,125,000 Total Project $ 65,839,473 3,620,615 $ 69,460,088 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F420.02.31 - T1N/R7E F420.03.31 - T1N/R7E F420.XX.X1 - T1N/R7E 2 F420.02.31 - Flood Control District F420.03.31 - Flood Control District F420.XX.X1 - Flood Control District F420.02.31 - City of Mesa F420.03.31 - City of Mesa F420.XX.X1 - City of Mesa (Potential/Unapproved) F420.02.31 - Flood Control District, City of Mesa F420.03.31 - Flood Control District, City of Mesa F420.XX.X1 - Flood Control District F420.02.31 - FY 2010 F420.03.31 - FY 2011 F420.XX.X1 - FY 2013 Project Description: F420.02.31 - Hermosa Vista / Hawes Road Drainage System The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Hermosa Vista / Hawes Road Storm Drain and Basin project is the first scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a storm drain from Spook Hill FRS, along Hermosa Vista Drive and Hawes Road, connecting to a local basin and a detention basin constructed at Hawes Road and Culver Street as a component of this project. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure provided by the McDowell Road and Oak Street projects. Construction is expected to begin in Fiscal Year 2009, with the City of Mesa as a project partner. F420.03.31 - McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain System The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain project is the second scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at McDowell Road and 76th Street (Sossaman Road) and a storm drain east along McDowell Road to Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District conjunction with drainage infrastructure provided by the Hermosa Vista / Hawes Road and Oak Street projects. Construction is expected to begin in Fiscal Year 2010, with the City of Mesa as a project partner. F420.XX.X1 – Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure provided by the Hermosa Vista / Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Construction is expected to begin in Fiscal Year 2012, with the City of Mesa as a project partner. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 7,935,899 IGA - Mesa, Pending 384,926 Project Total $ 8,320,825 Projected FY 07-08 $ 339,000 126,000 $ 465,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 5,555,000 1,900,000 $ 7,455,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 2,696,000 2,905,000 $ 5,601,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 1,018,000 1,222,000 $ 2,240,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 1,160,000 1,000,000 $ 2,160,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 63 5-Year Total $ 10,439,000 7,027,000 $ 17,466,000 Total Project $ 18,713,899 7,537,926 $ 26,251,825 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Spook Hill Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) and Outlet Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F300.01.31 - T1N/R7E 2 F300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation F300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation F300.01.31 - Flood Control District, Arizona Department of Transportation F300.01.31 - FY 2009 Project Description: F300.01.31 - Spook Hill FRS / Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202L) Modification Spook Hill FRS is a structural plan element of a Watershed Work Plan, prepared by the NRCS in January 1963, for the Buckhorn-Mesa Watershed Project located in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The dam was designed to impound floodwaters for a 100-year flood event and direct flows in excess of the 100-year flood event through an emergency spillway. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) is the lead agency in an effort to modify Spook Hill FRS to accommodate construction of the Power Road to University Drive segment of the Loop 202 freeway, which will pass over the dam within the dam's floodway, and to address all identified dam safety deficiencies. Modifications to address dam safety deficiencies include the installation of a central filter throughout the dam to protect against cracking, slope erosion repair, and replacement of the principal spillway. The District will provide easements to ADOT on District land, generating revenue that is expected to completely offset its $5 million contribution to the modification costs. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Previous Projected Funding Source Actuals FY 07-08 176,281 $ Flood Control District Property Tax 109,000 Project Total $ 176,281 $ 109,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 Flood Control District Year 2 FY 09-10 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 65 $ $ 5-Year Total 32,000 32,000 Total Project $ 317,281 $ 317,281 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Town of Guadalupe Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F035.04.31 5 F035.04.31 F035.04.31 F035.04.31 F035.04.31 - T1S/R4E - City of Tempe City of Tempe City of Tempe FY 2009 Project Description: F035.04.31 – ADOT Pit Modifications This largely-completed project provides a storm drain collection system and four retention basins along the Highline Canal that capture and convey the 10-year storm event within the Town of Guadalupe and east of Avenida del Yaqui. Runoff from within the Town had historically flooded low-lying houses and collected along the Highline Canal, where it eventually overtopped the canal and caused damage to downstream property within Tempe. Three of the project’s four basins are located within the Town and have been landscaped and converted to parks. The remaining basin, along the east side of the canal in Tempe, was landscaped and fenced due to its small size. Construction is complete with the exception of a potential future pump station that may be designed and constructed by the City of Tempe in a large drainage basin near I-10 and Warner Road. In accordance with the project IGA, the District will participate in a cost share if construction is completed by the end of Fiscal Year 2009. The Town owns, operates and maintains the storm drain system and four basins. Total project costs have been less than $7 million. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Projected Funding Source Actuals FY 07-08 8,564,172 $ Flood Control District Property Tax 1,000 86,315 IGA Project Total $ 8,650,487 $ 1,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 67 $ $ 5-Year Total 5,000 5,000 Total Project $ 8,570,172 86,315 $ 8,656,487 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Upper New River Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F371.11.39 3 F371.11.39 None F371.11.39 F371.11.39 - T7N/R2E - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - FY 2009 Project Description: F371.11.39 - Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Shelton (APN 202-11023C) Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. The Shelton property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2008 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates completing the purchase of the property in Fiscal Year 2008. Demolition, environmental surveys, and moving costs are expected in Fiscal Year 2009. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 68 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 649,805 Project Total $ 649,805 Projected FY 07-08 $ 432,000 $ 432,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ $ Year 3 FY 10-11 - $ $ Year 4 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 5 FY 12-13 - $ $ - Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 69 $ $ 5-Year Total 55,000 55,000 Total Project $ 1,136,805 $ 1,136,805 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District White Tanks – Agua Fria Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: F470.04.30 F470.04.31 F470.04.32 F470.08.30 F470.12.31 F470.13.31 F470.14.31 F470.15.31 F470.16.31 4, 5 F470.04.30 F470.04.31 F470.04.32 F470.08.30 F470.12.31 F470.13.31 F470.14.31 F470.15.31 F470.16.31 F470.04.30 F470.04.31 F470.04.32 F470.08.30 F470.12.31 Family Ent. F470.13.31 F470.14.31 F470.15.31 F470.16.31 F470.04.30 F470.04.31 F470.04.32 F470.08.30 F470.12.31 F470.13.31 F470.14.31 Goodyear - T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W T2N/R2W, T3N/R2W T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W T2N/R1W T3N/R1W T1N/R1W Loop 303 Corridor T3N/R1W T1N/R1W - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Town of Litchfield Park - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Flood Control District and ADOT – Public Works - City of Avondale - NRCS - NRCS, Maricopa Water District - None - Town of Litchfield Park - Public Works, Peoria, 180 LLC, Woolf - 70 City of Goodyear ADOT Public Works City of Avondale Flood Control District Flood Control District, MWD Flood Control District Town of Litchfield Park Flood Control District City of Goodyear ADOT, Flood Control District, City of Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Completion Date: Flood Control District F470.15.31 F470.16.31 F470.04.30 F470.04.31 F470.04.32 F470.08.30 F470.12.31 F470.13.31 F470.14.31 F470.15.31 F470.16.31 - Public Works City of Avondale FY 2010 FY 2009 FY 2013 FY 2010 FY 2010 Later than 5-Year CIP FY 2014 FY 2012 FY 2011 Project Description: F470.04.30 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Modifications White Tanks FRS No.3 is ranked first in the nation by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under their dam rehabilitation priority ranking process. The District and NRCS have proceeded with the project under "The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Amendment" (Public Law 106-472), which authorizes NRCS to assist watershed project sponsors with rehabilitation of aging dams on a 65 percent federal, 35 percent local cost share basis, and NRCS is additionally providing technical assistance for the project. In Fiscal Year 2004, the District contracted an alternative evaluation and chose to modify the dam. The District and NRCS completed the final work plan and environmental assessment in 2004 and signed an IGA for the project early in Fiscal Year 2005. Dam modification design is complete, and construction is underway. The first phase of construction includes plugging and abandoning existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP) outlets, construction of principal pipe outlets to replace the existing CMP outlets, and construction of a soil cement embankment section and cutoff walls in the dam's south fissure risk zone. The second phase of construction will construct a new emergency spillway structure, and the north fissure risk zone embankment and the non-fissure risk zone embankment. The dam’s north inlet channel, identified as the third phase of this project, is being constructed in parallel with the dam modifications (see Project F470.04.31 below). Specific federal funding included in the IGA supports the first and second phases of the project. F470.04.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 North Inlet Channel The White Tanks FRS No.3 North Inlet Channel (NIC) Project, which was identified in the White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan, includes the construction of a channel along the east side of the Beardsley Canal from Olive Avenue to Northern Avenue, a splitter structure and road/canal crossing at Olive Avenue, a road / canal crossing at Northern Avenue, a box culvert at Northern Avenue, erosion protection of the Beardsley Canal at Cholla Wash, and improvements to the existing channel west of the Beardsley Canal and south of Northern Avenue. The 100-year flows historically broke out over the Beardsley Canal, inundating a residential area. The NIC Project protects the Beardsley Canal between Olive and Northern avenues, the existing flood control channel south of Northern Avenue, and approximately 118 homes east of the Beardsley Canal. 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Construction of the channel from Olive Avenue south to Northern Avenue is complete. Construction of the channel from Northern Avenue south to White Tanks FRS No. 3 is in progress, and is expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2009. This is a joint project with the Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One (MWD), who owns the Beardsley Canal, and the District. The Maricopa County Department of Transportation also participated in a cost share for the box culvert at Olive Avenue. F470.04.32 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel In Fiscal Year 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4 (this project), rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No. 4 (project F201.02.31) and an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 4 to the Gila River (project F201.01.31). This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Camelback Road south to Interstate-10, the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet Channel project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. Resolution FCD 2004R011 authorizes advance land acquisitions for the project that are necessary due to the rapid development in the area. Acquisition is expected to begin in Fiscal Year 2009 for land most threatened by valuation increases. F470.08.30 - Litchfield Park Drainage Improvements This multi-phase storm drain project, proposed by the City of Litchfield Park, is the final project remaining to be implemented to resolve flooding issues in this area of the County. Other completed projects include the Colter Channel and the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) Overchute project. The project consists of a series of storm drains constructed north of Indian School Road to capture and convey storm water to the RID Overchute structure located south of Indian School Road, at Old Litchfield Road. It is anticipated that the City will be the lead agency for all tasks, and the District will participate in a cost share agreement. An amendment to the existing IGA with the City is required to increase the District's cost share and contribute funding to complete construction. F470.12.31 - Reems Road Channel This project includes a flood control channel along the west side of Reems Road from south of Peoria Avenue to the Dysart Drain at the Falcon Dunes Golf Course, and a 42-acre basin north of Olive Avenue. The channel and basin will provide 100-year flood protection and outlet to the Dysart Drain within the Falcon Dunes Golf Course. The City of Surprise is constructing the channel from Peoria Avenue north to Waddell Road. The District is constructing the channel and basin south of Peoria Avenue, and also cost sharing with the City of Surprise on the box culvert to be constructed at Peoria Avenue. Public Works has agreed to cost share to extend box culverts at Olive and Butler to their ultimate length. The project design is largely complete, and construction is anticipated to begin in the last quarter of Fiscal Year 2008. 72 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District F470.13.31 - Bullard Wash Phase II Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor / White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a previous District / City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen / greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This storm water would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to Interstate-10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City funding and will likely occur outside the five-year CIP. F470.14.31 - Loop 303 Drainage Improvements The Loop 303 Corridor / White Tanks ADMP provided a drainage master plan to determine guidelines for storm water management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 208 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a storm water collection and conveyance system and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303 Loop. The District anticipates participating with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) in this regional project, and intends to construct drainage solutions south from Van Buren Street to the Gila River, while ADOT will construct the project north from Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will precede construction of SR 303L. Advance land acquisition is planned for Fiscal Year 2009, and construction is scheduled to begin late in the five-year CIP. F470.15.31 - Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (Loop 303 to Reems) The Public Works / Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from Loop 303 to Reems Road, which subsequently connects to the Dysart Basin, also known as Falcon Dunes Golf Course. The project provides 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with Public Works and the City of Glendale. Construction is expected late in the five-year CIP. F470.16.31 - Elm Lane Drainage Mitigation The Elm Drainage Mitigation Project at Central Avenue and Elm Lane in Avondale involves the construction of one-half mile of storm drains with catch basins, two retention basins and an outfall culvert and provides protection from a 10-year storm event. The project resulted from an alternatives mini-study conducted by the City of Avondale in response to flooding in streets and homes. 73 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The City of Avondale will act as the project's lead agency, and the District will share in 50 percent of the total project cost. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • • Dam Safety Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Projected Funding Source Actuals FY 07-08 67,472,286 $ 12,909,000 Flood Control District Property Tax 7,509,302 IGA - Various 9,543,000 Project Total $ 74,981,588 $ 22,452,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 11,760,000 5,523,000 $ 17,283,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 9,688,000 212,000 $ 9,900,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 6,142,000 $ 6,142,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 8,397,000 $ 8,397,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 21,720,000 $ 21,720,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 74 5-Year Total $ 57,707,000 5,735,000 $ 63,442,000 Total Project $ 138,088,286 22,787,302 $ 160,875,588 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F201.01.31 F201.02.31 4 F201.01.31 F201.02.31 F201.01.31 F201.02.31 F201.01.31 F201.02.31 F201.01.31 F201.02.31 - T1N/R2W, T2W/R2W - T1NR2W, T2N/R2W - Flood Control District Flood Control District None NRCS (anticipated/pending) Flood Control District Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP FY 2013 Project Description: F201.01.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet Channel The District's Buckeye ADMP is examining alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No.4 to the Gila River, ranging from a base-flow channel to a 100-year conveyance, primarily along the Tuthill Road alignment. Design of the selected alternative is scheduled to commence in Fiscal Year 2011, followed by right-ofway acquisition and construction. Right of way acquisition may accelerate to maximize the District’s leverage with respect to market conditions and area development. This project will complement the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.3, the construction of an outlet channel for White Tanks FRS No.3, and the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Efforts to explore potential project partnering arrangements are ongoing. F201.02.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation Corrective action is required to bring White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure No. 4 (White Tanks FRS No.4), operated and maintained by the District, into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies requiring corrective action. These deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, an inadequate left spillway and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004. Design efforts are tentatively scheduled for Fiscal Year 2009 following the completion of an alternative evaluation and pre-design. 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • • Capital Projects Dam Safety Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 2,248,560 IGA - Pending Project Total $ 2,248,560 Projected FY 07-08 $ 87,000 $ 87,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 780,000 $ 780,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 2,160,000 4,000,000 $ 6,160,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 270,000 3,000,000 $ 3,270,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 7,150,000 7,000,000 $ 14,150,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 2,250,000 2,000,000 $ 4,250,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 76 5-Year Total $ 12,610,000 16,000,000 $ 28,610,000 Total Project $ 14,945,560 16,000,000 $ 30,945,560 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Wickenburg ADMP Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F343.01.31 - T7N/R5W F343.09.39 - T7N/R5W F343.XX.X1 - T7N/R5W 4 F343.01.31 - Flood Control District F343.09.39 - Flood Control District F343.XX.X1 - Flood Control District F343.01.31 - Town of Wickenburg F343.09.39 - None F343.XX.X1 - None F343.01.31 - Town of Wickenburg F343.09.39 - Flood Control District F343.XX.X1 - Flood Control District F343.01.31 - FY 2009 F343.09.39 - FY 2009 F343.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: F343.01.31 - Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. The project will provide a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It will also convey the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction began in Fiscal Year 2008 and is expected to be complete by Fiscal Year 2009. F343.09.31 - Floodprone Property Assistance Program: 019B) Welna (APN 505-14- Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. The Welna property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2008 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates completing the purchase of the property in Fiscal Year 2008. Demolition, environmental surveys, and moving costs are expected in Fiscal Year 2009. F343.XX.X1 (Unallocated) Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Wickenburg Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. The area covered by the Wickenburg ADMP includes the second-highest quantity of homes within an identified floodway (estimated 40 of 383 county-wide), and fifty percent of budgeted, unallocated FPAP dollars are tentatively held in the Wickenburg account pending completion of the annual FPAP prioritization process. Following the identification of specific targeted properties, and with the concurrence of the District’s Board, this funding will be reallocated to accounts containing these properties, or to other projects’ accounts as needed. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 6,413,888 IGA - Wickenburg 204,174 Project Total $ 6,618,062 Projected FY 07-08 $ 5,598,000 1,123,000 $ 6,721,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,964,000 25,000 $ 2,989,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,015,000 $ 1,015,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 1,015,000 $ 1,015,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 79 $ $ 5-Year Total 6,024,000 25,000 6,049,000 Total Project $ 18,035,888 1,352,174 $ 19,388,062 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Wittmann ADMP Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: F344.XX.X1 4 F344.XX.X1 None F344.XX.X1 F344.XX.X1 - T5N/R3W - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: F343.XX.X1 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Wittmann (Unallocated) Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. The area covered by the Wittmann ADMP includes the highest quantity of homes within an identified floodway (estimated 43 of 383 county-wide) , and fifty percent of budgeted, unallocated FPAP dollars are tentatively held in the Wittmann account pending completion of the annual FPAP prioritization process. Following the identification of specific targeted properties, and with the concurrence of the District’s Board, this funding will be reallocated to accounts containing these properties, or to other projects’ accounts as needed. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax $ 253,186 Project Total $ 253,186 Projected FY 07-08 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 710,000 $ 710,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,015,000 $ 1,015,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 515,000 $ 515,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 1,015,000 $ 1,015,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 81 $ $ 5-Year Total 3,770,000 3,770,000 Total Project $ 4,025,186 $ 4,025,186 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Project Reserve Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: N/A 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Description: FCPR – Flood Control Project Reserve The District’s budgeted project reserve provides supplemental funding for unanticipated cost increases and increases project scheduling flexibility, allowing the District to accelerate flood control projects when it is appropriate or advantageous to do so. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Flood Control District Property Tax Project Total $ - Projected FY 07-08 $ 1,433,000 $ 1,433,000 Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,430,000 $ 2,430,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 1,982,000 $ 1,982,000 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ 3,733,000 $ 3,733,000 Year 4 FY 11-12 $ 3,349,000 $ 3,349,000 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 Operating Cost Summary Partnering jurisdictions will assume operational costs upon completion of the projects. 82 5-Year Total $ 13,294,000 $ 13,294,000 Total Project $ 14,727,000 $ 14,727,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Motions Library District Approve the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Tentative Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for Library District in the amount of $25,677,127; and set a public hearing to solicit public comment on the FY 2008-09 Budget for Monday, June 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM. 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District adopted revenue budget for FY 2008-09 is $25,677,130 and expenditure budget for 2008-09 is $25,677,127. The tax rate has been reduced from $0.0391 to $0.0353 per $100 of assessed value due to the direction by the Board of Directors to implement a 2% levy cap, excluding new construction, in order to protect taxpayers from tax increases due to increased assessed property values. In FY 2007-08, the District opened the new Perry Branch Library in Gilbert and the Civic Center Library in Avondale. The organization of the Perry Branch without the Dewey Decimal System has attracted national and international attention from the media and the library community. Also in FY 2007-08, the District sold the Campbell Branch Library to Paradise Valley Community College. In FY 2008-09, the District plans to open a new branch in Queen Creek. Property Tax Revenue by Fiscal Year $22,000,000 $21,000,000 $20,375,371 $20,000,000 Property Tax Revenue $19,229,055 $19,000,000 $18,059,040 $18,000,000 $16,976,551 $17,000,000 $16,000,000 $15,534,579 $15,000,000 $14,000,000 FY 05 Actual FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 08 Projected FY09 Adopted Fiscal Year Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 84 The District has seen continued growth in the use of the District’s libraries by the residents of the County. In calendar year 2007, the annual increase in circulation of library materials is up 36%, web page use is up 56%, and electronic database use is up 58%. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Analysis by Julia Smith, Management & Budget Analyst Summary Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. Strategic Goals • Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: The department implemented a Customer Comment system which allows customers to request materials be added to the collection. This allows direct feedback about what materials would satisfy customers. The customer satisfaction rating for FY 2006-07 was 86.6% and for FY 2007-08 was 92.0%. • By June 30, 2008, increase resource usage to meet or exceed the average increase of 10 benchmark libraries. Status: The District is making progress towards this goal with the expansion of electronic databases for County libraries, upgraded computers, and the library card sign-up campaign for children. • By June 30, 2009, increase the number of active (card is used at least 3 times in 12 months) cardholders by 40% over the 89,593 cardholders on June 30, 2004. Status: The FY 2008-09 adopted budget continues to support this goal. • Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: The FY 2008-09 adopted budget supports the attainment of this goal. 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity – All Funds FY 2006-07 ACTUAL REVENUE 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAPC - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICES FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST FY 2008-09 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ 1,508,976 1,508,976 $ 3,129,822 3,129,822 $ 3,502,772 3,502,772 $ 2,957,899 2,957,899 $ 5,065,964 5,065,964 $ 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES $ 4,668,362 4,196,197 472,165 $ 402,266 202,266 200,000 $ 402,266 202,266 200,000 $ 548,915 14,659 534,256 $ 17,483 600 16,883 $ 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 18,394,797 18,394,797 $ 19,366,349 19,366,349 $ 19,366,349 19,366,349 $ 19,399,531 19,399,531 $ 20,558,488 20,558,488 $ 1,192,139 1,192,139 6.2% 6.2% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEVELOP TOTAL PROGRAMS $ EXPENDITURES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ MAPC - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICES 24,572,135 $ 22,898,437 $ 23,271,387 $ 22,906,345 $ 35,195 35,195 25,677,130 $ 35,195 35,195 2,405,743 0.0% 0.0% 10.3% 15,749,921 15,749,921 $ 16,537,345 16,537,345 $ 17,092,499 17,092,499 $ 16,799,988 16,799,988 $ 22,114,864 22,114,864 $ (5,022,365) -29.4% (5,022,365) -29.4% $ $ $ $ $ 1,563,192 1,563,192 44.6% 44.6% (384,783) -95.7% (201,666) -99.7% (183,117) -91.6% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT $ 2,381,743 117,663 1,789,302 166,167 298,476 - $ 2,181,446 106,146 1,374,821 280,616 419,863 - $ 2,181,441 106,146 1,374,816 280,616 419,863 - $ 2,121,524 153,911 1,415,248 261,401 290,964 - $ 1,645,794 116,763 923,381 294,896 272,303 38,451 $ 535,647 24.6% (10,617) -10.0% 451,435 32.8% (14,280) -5.1% 147,560 35.1% (38,451) 0.0% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES $ 1,000,161 840,961 159,200 $ 843,520 778,880 64,640 $ 843,520 778,880 64,640 $ 848,418 778,880 69,538 $ 818,357 818,357 - $ 25,163 3.0% (39,477) -5.1% 64,640 100.0% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEVELOP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SERVICES TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 990,855 341,256 157,413 283,823 208,363 20,122,680 $ 1,168,890 260,488 260,853 424,988 222,561 20,731,201 $ 1,168,890 260,488 260,853 424,988 222,561 21,286,350 $ 1,453,467 515,088 171,212 348,898 418,269 21,223,397 $ 1,098,112 371,867 240,467 229,145 256,633 25,677,127 $ 70,778 6.1% (111,379) -42.8% 20,386 7.8% 195,843 46.1% (34,072) -15.3% (4,390,777) -20.6% $ $ $ $ $ Sources FY 2006-07 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST FY 2008-09 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ SUBTOTAL $ 18,059,039 18,059,039 $ $ 19,163,520 19,163,520 $ $ 19,163,520 19,163,520 $ $ 19,229,055 19,229,055 $ $ 20,375,371 20,375,371 $ $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 134,754 450,018 263,004 847,776 $ 25,000 10,000 202,829 237,829 $ 62,000 335,861 202,829 600,690 $ 85,513 10,000 179,963 275,476 $ 183,117 183,117 $ CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ 3,791 3,791 $ SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 2,262,502 2,262,502 579,650 579,650 $ $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ 472,165 4,609,714 5,081,879 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,572,135 FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS $ $ $ $ 2,267,252 2,267,252 550,000 550,000 $ $ $ $ 200,000 484,586 684,586 $ 22,898,437 $ $ 2,001,155 2,526 2,003,681 550,000 550,000 $ $ $ $ 200,000 489,925 689,925 $ 23,271,387 86 $ $ $ $ 4,023,156 24,210 4,047,366 632,945 632,945 $ $ $ $ 534,256 230,932 765,188 $ 22,906,345 $ $ 1,211,851 1,211,851 6.3% 6.3% (62,000) -100.0% (335,861) -100.0% (19,712) -9.7% (417,573) -69.5% $ 1,755,904 24,210 1,780,114 78.5% 609,020 609,020 $ $ 59,020 59,020 10.7% 10.7% $ $ 216,883 245,373 462,256 $ 25,677,130 $ $ 77.4% 16,883 8.4% (244,552) -49.9% (227,669) -33.0% 2,405,743 10.3% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Uses FY 2006-07 ACTUAL FY 2007-08 ADOPTED ALL FUNDS 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 6,081,264 764,480 4,395 2,041,195 14,105 379,265 9,284,704 $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL $ 4,778,991 13,618 693,724 5,486,333 $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES $ 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2007-08 REVISED 6,822,938 1,115,447 2,332,625 42,129 10,313,139 $ $ $ 5,092,834 13,000 5,105,834 718,199 $ 253,871 301,106 2,240,549 (1,380) 71,308 55,788 280,875 548,124 4,468,440 $ 336,682 376,847 255,400 2,956,954 48,500 59,000 227,500 621,550 4,882,433 $ $ $ CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ 19,050 407,157 20,324 436,672 883,203 $ $ 429,795 429,795 TOTAL USES $ 20,122,680 $ 20,731,201 FY 2007-08 FORECAST 6,822,938 1,115,447 2,332,654 42,129 10,313,168 $ 5,113,438 13,000 5,126,438 $ 362,682 376,847 763,945 2,956,925 48,500 59,000 227,500 621,550 5,416,949 $ $ $ 429,795 429,795 $ 21,286,350 $ $ $ 87 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 7,107,330 1,017,427 1,735 2,376,234 25,489 10,528,215 $ 5,313,813 13,788 369,740 5,697,341 $ 331,814 392,743 479,577 2,411,048 10,638 93,935 67,606 218,391 439,546 4,445,298 $ $ $ 90,047 462,496 552,543 $ 21,223,397 $ $ $ $ $ $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 6,769,613 $ 1,490,059 2,416,633 54,638 (193,653) 193,653 10,730,943 $ 5,658,040 16,000 110,000 5,784,040 $ $ 561,927 $ 386,918 598,750 3,046,023 80,100 170,345 240,770 584,884 (135,879) 135,879 5,669,717 $ $ 53,325 (374,612) (83,979) (12,509) 193,653 (193,653) (417,775) 0.8% -33.6% 0.0% -3.6% -29.7% 0.0% 0.0% -4.1% (544,602) (3,000) (110,000) (657,602) -10.7% -23.1% 0.0% -12.8% (199,245) -54.9% (10,071) 0.0% 165,195 21.6% (89,098) -3.0% (31,600) 0.0% (111,345) -188.7% (13,270) -5.8% 36,666 5.9% 135,879 0.0% (135,879) 0.0% (252,768) -4.7% $ 500,000 2,637,092 104,500 250,835 3,492,427 $ (500,000) 0.0% (2,637,092) 0.0% 0.0% (104,500) 0.0% 178,960 41.6% (3,062,632) -712.6% $ 25,677,127 $ (4,390,777) -20.6% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund FY 2006-07 ACTUAL FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2008-09 ADOPTED SOURCES 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS SPECIAL REVENUE - GRANT $ $ 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE 900 - ELIMINATIONS - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 134,754 134,754 $ $ 25,000 25,000 $ $ 62,000 62,000 $ $ 85,513 85,513 $ $ $ $ 22,820,832 22,820,832 $ $ 23,209,387 23,209,387 $ $ 22,873,437 22,873,437 $ $ 24,437,381 24,437,381 $ 24,572,135 $ 22,898,437 $ 23,271,387 $ $ TOTAL FUNDS $ 24,572,135 $ $ 22,898,437 $ $ 23,271,387 $ $ 7,708,315 7,708,315 - $ $ $ $ $ $ 21,915,639 4,694,929 26,610,568 22,906,345 $ 26,610,568 22,906,345 $ $ (8,641,753) $ 25,677,130 $ 7,708,315 7,708,315 0.0% 0.0% (62,000) -100.0% (62,000) -100.0% $ (1,293,748) 4,694,929 3,401,181 -5.6% 0.0% 14.7% $ 3,339,181 14.3% (8,641,753) 2,405,743 0.0% 10.3% (3,137,092) (3,137,092) 0.0% 0.0% USES 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS SPECIAL REVENUE - GRANT $ $ 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE 980 - ELIMINATIONS - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 134,754 134,754 $ $ 25,000 25,000 $ $ 62,000 62,000 $ $ 62,000 62,000 $ $ $ $ 21,161,397 21,161,397 $ $ 21,224,350 21,224,350 $ $ 20,706,201 20,706,201 $ $ 19,987,926 19,987,926 $ 20,122,680 $ 20,731,201 $ 21,286,350 $ $ TOTAL FUNDS $ 20,122,680 $ $ 20,731,201 $ $ 21,286,350 $ $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 - $ $ $ $ $ 26,486,859 4,694,929 31,181,788 21,223,397 $ 31,181,788 21,223,397 $ $ $ 62,000 62,000 100.0% 100.0% $ (5,262,509) (4,694,929) (9,957,438) -24.8% 0.0% -46.9% $ (9,895,438) -46.5% (8,641,753) $ 25,677,127 $ 8,641,753 (4,390,777) 0.0% -20.6% Programs and Activities Public Library Services Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers, so that their needs, interests and goals are met. Program Results Measure FY 2007 Description Actual Percent of customers who rate overall library services as Not Reported excellent Not Reported Percent of customers who report that they found enjoyment, personal development and/or cultural enrichment through library services Percent of customers who report that the program/activity Not Reported was valuable to them Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with 92.2% the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner FY 2008 Forecast 62.2% 91.0% FY 2009 Variance % Variance Adopted Forecast - Adopted Forecast - Adopted 62.2% 0.0% 0.0% 95.1% 95.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 92.0% 92.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.0% 91.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so that they get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Mandates: None. Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who report that they found enjoyment, personal development and/or cultural enrichment through library services Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Number of customers who rate overall library services Number of items circulated Number of library cards issued Number of programs/activities offered Number of items to be circulated Dollar cost per item circulated FY 2007 Actual Not Reported FY 2008 Forecast 95.1% FY 2009 Variance % Variance Adopted Forecast - Adopted Forecast - Adopted 95.1% 0.0% 0.0% 92.2% 92.0% 92.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.0% 91.0% 91.0% 0.0% 0.0% Not Reported 62.2% 62.2% 0.0% 0.0% Not Reported 3,764 3,764 - 0.0% 4,531,500 52,643 3,418 4,800,000 3.48 $ 4,531,500 52,643 3,418 4,800,000 3.71 $ 4,531,500 52,643 3,418 4,800,000 3.33 $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS $ 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 62,000.00 1,446,976 1,508,976 $ 95,000.00 2,862,899 2,957,899 $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS $ 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 134,754 15,615,167 15,749,921 $ 62,000 16,737,988 16,799,988 $ $ $ $ 0.38 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.1% $ 1,304,473 4,694,929 7,708,315 (8,641,753) 5,065,964 $ (95,000.00) (1,558,426) 4,694,929 7,708,315 (8,641,753) 2,108,065 -100.0% -54.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 71.3% $ 22,924,596 4,694,929 3,137,092 (8,641,753) 22,114,864 $ 62,000 (6,186,608) (4,694,929) (3,137,092) 8,641,753 (5,314,876) 100.0% -37.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -31.6% Expenditure $ 89 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds Sources of Funds (Excluding Fund Balance) $25,677,130 Permits, Fees & Fines 2% Miscellaneous & Interest 2% Property Taxes, Penalties & Interest 80% Other Intergovernmental & Grants 16% Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $25,677,127 Information Technology, 5% Administrative Services, 16% Public Library Service, 79% 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Budget Summary Consolidated Budget by Fund Type LIBRARY DISTRICT BEG. UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. FUND TY PE: CAPITAL PROJECTS SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET SUBTO TAL Value $ 11,495,282 $ 11,495,282 $ - SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAX ES $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES OTHER CHARGES FO R SERVICES FINES & FORFEITS INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERTING SOURCES $ 20,375,371 183,117 4,023,156 24,210 609,020 16,883 145,373 1,233,438 26,610,568 $ $ $ - - $ - $ 200,000 100,000 7,408,315 7,708,315 $ NON-RECURRING INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TO TAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ $ ELIMINATIONS $ 20,375,371 $ 183,117 4,023,156 24,210 609,020 16,883 145,373 1,233,438 26,610,568 $ - TOTAL $ 11,495,282 - $ (1,233,438) (1,233,438) $ 20,375,371 183,117 4,023,156 24,210 609,020 16,883 145,373 25,377,130 200,000 100,000 300,000 $ $ 200,000 100,000 7,408,315 7,708,315 $ - $ (7,408,315) (7,408,315) $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 26,610,568 $ 7,708,315 $ 34,318,883 $ (8,641,753) $ 25,677,130 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 10,730,943 5,784,040 5,669,717 355,335 1,233,438 23,773,473 $ $ 10,730,943 5,784,040 5,669,717 355,335 1,233,438 23,773,473 $ $ - - $ (1,233,438) (1,233,438) $ 10,730,943 5,784,040 5,669,717 355,335 22,540,035 - $ 7,408,315 7,408,315 $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 $ $ $ 3,137,092 7,408,315 10,545,407 $ - $ (7,408,315) (7,408,315) $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 (8,641,753) $ 25,677,127 NON-RECURRING CAPITAL $ OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NO N-RECURRING USES $ $ $ TOTAL USES $ 31,181,788 $ 3,137,092 $ 34,318,880 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 2,837,095 $ - $ 2,837,095 $ - $ 2,837,095 ENDING UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ 6,924,062 $ 4,571,223 $ 11,495,285 $ - $ 11,495,285 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate. Fiscal Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy $ 14,343,156 $ 0.0421 $ 6,038,469 15,723,498 0.0421 6,619,593 16,813,017 0.0421 7,078,280 18,676,830 0.0421 7,862,946 20,877,716 0.0421 8,586,315 22,913,134 0.0421 9,646,430 24,457,047 0.0421 10,182,607 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. The schedule above lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last twelve fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2008-09. The Library District’s property tax rate has been reduced to $0.0353 per $100 net assessed value, a difference of ($0.0038) from FY 2007-08. As reflected in the graph below, the tax rate is declining for the third year in a row in response to increased secondary net assessed values. 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value Vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Fiscal Year The FY 2008-09 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $20,581,183, an increase of $1,213,165 (5.90%) from the FY 2007-08 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2008-09 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT: FY 2008-09 Preliminary FY 2007-08 Adopted FY 2006-07 Adopted $ $ $ 58,303,635,287 49,534,573,831 36,294,693,601 Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value $ $ $ 518,745,464 518,745,464 542,156,376 Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1-cent Levy Tax Rates SRP Payment in Lieu of Taxes Total Tax Levy & Property Tax Levy (PILT) PILT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 58,822,380,751 50,053,319,295 36,836,849,977 93 5,882,238 5,005,332 3,683,685 0.0353 0.0391 0.0507 20,581,183 19,368,018 18,401,410 $ $ $ 183,117 202,829 274,873 $ $ $ 20,764,300 19,570,847 18,676,283 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Levy Limit FY 2008-09 Library District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 19,368,018 19,755,378 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value (partially estimated*) $ 55,982,759,248 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value $ 58,303,635,287 D. Recommended Calculation D3. Recommended Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Divided by 100) D5. Recommended Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.0353 20,581,183 1,213,165 6.3% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 53,363,270,163 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 2,619,489,085 Total $ 55,982,759,248 Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2008-09 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 99.0% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2008-09. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2008-09 $ Levy Amount 20,581,183 Estimated Collections $ 20,375,371 94 Rate 99.00% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2001-02 $ 191,864 2002-03 186,473 2003-04 252,593 2004-05 281,442 2005-06 270,953 2006-07 246,032 2007-08* 202,829 2008-09** 183,117 * Projected Actual ** Budget Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Queen Creek Maricopa County Special Healthcare District (automation services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library Civic Center Library TOTAL 95 FY 2007-08 $ 1,063,752 75,000 25,030 10,000 848,720 250,000 $ 2,272,502 FY 2008-09 $ 1,067,206 82,940 25,408 837,092 10,985 1,456,762 542,763 $ 4,023,156 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Fines and Forfeits Fiscal Year 2001-02 $ 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08* 2008-09** Fines 256,605 339,099 479,128 524,082 621,684 547,589 550,000 609,020 The District collects fines in accord with the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2001-02 through FY 2006-07, the projected amount for FY 2007-08 and the anticipated amount for FY 2008-09. * Projected ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue Fiscal Miscellaneous Year Revenue 2001-02 $ 374,637 2002-03 311,046 2003-04 531,961 2004-05 740,186 2005-06 1,140,257 2006-07 776,912 2007-08* 684,586 2008-09** 145,373 The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart at the left illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2001-02 through the FY 2008-09 budget. * Projected ** Budget Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2007-08. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Fund designations are explained in greater detail later in this section. A list of fund balance designations is provided below. Estimated beginning fund balances for FY 2008-09 are based on audited actual ending fund balances for FY 2005-06, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). For governmental funds, the “unreserved fund balance” is used. 96 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DIST RICT FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET SOURCES: USES: FUND UNDESIG. BEG. FUND BALANCE OPERATING NON RECURRING SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 11,471,769 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ 11,471,769 $ SPECIAL REVENUE - GRANT 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS $ 23,513 $ - $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ - $ - $ ELIMINATIONS $ - $ (1,233,438) $ TOTAL $ 11,495,282 $ 25,377,130 $ 21,915,639 4,694,929 26,610,568 $ OPERATING - $ - $ - 7,708,315 $ 300,000 $ $ $ - $ $ - $ (7,408,315) $ $ 19,078,544 4,694,929 23,773,473 NON RECURRING $ 7,408,315 7,408,315 - 3,137,092 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ $ 2,837,095 2,837,095 $ $ 6,900,549 6,900,549 $ - $ 23,513 $ - $ 4,571,223 $ - (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) $ 22,540,035 3,137,092 $ UNDESIG. ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 2,837,095 $ 11,495,285 Fund Designations The following schedule lists amounts designated within the estimated balances of the Library District’s operating fund. Designations are the District’s self-imposed limitations on financial resources that would otherwise be available for use. The major fund balance designation is for budget stabilization to ensure that sufficient cash is set aside to cover shortfalls during the fiscal year due to the property tax collection cycle. FY 2008-09 Fund Balance Designations Fund/Designation Library District (Fund 244) Budget Stabilization: Cash Flow/Property Tax FY 2007-08 $ 2,719,171 FY 2008-09 $ 2,600,000 (Inc.)/Dec. $ 119,171 (1) (1) Based on estimate of the amount needed to eliminate the need for Tax Anticipation Notes or other forms of short-term borrowing to finance current operations. 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants (242) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Gates Library Initiative Grant Target Early Childhood Grant Target Family Festival Grant FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Gates Library Initiative Grant Target Early Childhood Grant Target Family Festival Grant $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ $ Subtotal $ 2,000 10,000 25,000 37,000 $ 2,000 10,000 25,000 37,000 $ 62,000 $ 62,000 $ Subtotal $ FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Reduction of State Aid Grant $ Subtotal $ FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 98 (2,000) $ (10,000) (25,000) (37,000) $ 25,000 $ (25,000) $ (25,000) $ - (2,000) (10,000) (25,000) (37,000) 25,000 (25,000) (25,000) $ - - $ -100.0% -100.0% - $ - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Library District (244) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 20,706,201 $ 22,873,437 MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Cash Donations IGA Amendments and One-Time Improvements $ $ Subtotal $ 4,854 513,295 518,149 $ 4,854 331,096 335,950 $ 21,224,350 $ 23,209,387 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Cash Donations IGA Amendments Increased Property Tax Revenue Capital Outlay $ Subtotal $ (4,854) $ 449,195 3,171,347 3,615,688 $ FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ 24,840,038 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Reallocation to Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Request Above/Below Target $ (3,461,494) $ (2,300,000) (5,761,494) $ (3,461,491) 537,092 (2,924,399) Subtotal $ $ (4,854) 423,654 1,211,851 1,630,651 24,840,038 FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 19,078,544 $ 21,915,639 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ 19,078,544 $ -23.2% 21,915,639 -11.8% NON-OPERATING NON-OPERATING 0001 Transfer to Library Capital Projects Fund (465) FY 2008-09 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET 99 $ Subtotal $ 7,408,315 7,408,315 $ $ - $ 7,408,315 $ - $ 26,486,859 $ 21,915,639 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental (246) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ - $ - FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ - $ - FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ - $ - REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Reallocation from Library District Fund (244) - Intergovernmental Revenue $ Transfer In from Library District Fund (244) - Library Portion of IGAs Subtotal $ 3,461,491 1,233,438 4,694,929 $ $ 3,461,491 1,233,438 4,694,929 FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 4,694,929 $ 4,694,929 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ 4,694,929 $ 4,694,929 FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 4,694,929 $ 4,694,929 Library District Capital Improvement (465) EXPENDITURES REVENUE NON-OPERATING NON-OPERATING 0001 Transfer from Library District Fund (244) Interest Earnings Quality of Life Contributions from Developers $ - $ $ Subtotal $ 2,637,092 500,000 3,137,092 $ 2,637,092 500,000 3,137,092 $ 3,137,092 $ 7,708,315 $ 3,137,092 $ 7,708,315 Subtotal $ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Library Building White Tank (LDB1) Library District Tech Phase 2 (LDT2) $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET 100 $ 4,271,223 200,000 100,000 4,571,223 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Capital Improvement Program Summary A Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) has been established in the FY 2008-09 budget to track the expenditure of capital project spending by the Library District. Project Detail A total of two capital projects are identified and recommended by the Library District Board of Directors. The adopted projects are as follows: 465 LIBRARY DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTED IMPROVEMENT PREVIOUS FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 Library Building White Tank $ - $ - $ 2,637,092 Library District Technology Phase 2 500,000 TOTAL FUND 465 $ - $ - $ 3,137,092 FY 2009-10 7,055,908 $ 7,055,908 $ 101 FY 2010-11 $ $ FY 2011-12 - $ $ FY 2012-13 - $ $ - 5-YEAR TOTAL (FY 2009-13) 9,693,000 500,000 $ 10,193,000 $ TOTAL PROJECT 9,693,000 500,000 $ 10,193,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Building – White Tank Branch Project Location: SE Corner of Parcel 20 in Zanjero Trails (1000’ West of Olive & Perryville) County District(s): 4 Managing Department: Library District Project Partner(s): None Scheduled Completion Date: April 2010 Project Description Construction of the White Tank Branch Library will meet the library needs of the residents living in the unincorporated developments east of the White Tank Park. The Library District is receiving contributions for the construction of a library from the developers of these master plan communities. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Library District Building – White Tank Branch project is to provide library service for the residents of Maricopa County so that they have access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Strategic Goals Addressed Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Strategic Plan Programs Supported Public Library Service Strategic Plan Activities Supported Public Library Service Result Measures FY 2007-08 Year-To-Date Actual RESULT MEASURE Percent of customers who report that the Library’s collection of books and other materials met their needs FY 2007-08 Year-End Projected 92.5% Projected with Capital Improvement 92.5% 93.0% Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Library Donations from Developers $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 07-08 $ $ - Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 2,637,092 $ 2,637,092 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ 7,055,908 $ 7,055,908 102 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ $ - Year 4 FY 11-12 $ $ - Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - 5-Year Total $ 9,693,000 $ 9,693,000 Total Project $ 9,693,000 $ 9,693,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Operating Cost Summary Year 1 FY 08-09 Year 2 FY 09-10 Year 3 FY 10-11 Year 4 FY 11-12 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 10,517,043 9,760,433 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,106,525 10,353,761 346,579 $ 21,806,865 $ 11,495,253 10,716,143 358,709 $ 22,570,105 $ 11,897,587 11,091,208 371,264 $ 23,360,059 $ 12,314,003 11,479,400 384,258 $ 24,177,661 Post-Construction Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services $ 10,517,043 Supplies & Services 9,760,433 Capital Outlay 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,417,034 10,664,065 346,579 $ 22,427,678 $ 12,780,760 11,455,940 358,709 $ 24,595,409 $ 13,228,087 11,856,898 371,264 $ 25,456,249 $ 13,691,070 12,271,889 399,258 $ 26,362,217 $ $ $ $ $ FY 07-08 Current Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Net Operating Cost Increase (post less current) Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ Total $ - $ 103 - $ 310,509 310,304 620,813 $ 1,285,507 739,797 2,025,304 $ 1,330,500 765,690 2,096,190 $ 1,377,067 792,489 15,000 2,184,556 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Technology Phase 2 Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Scheduled Completion Date: District-Wide 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Library District None June 30, 2009 Project Description The Library District Technology Phase 2 project will increase the capacity and the security of the network in order to meet the demands of the growth in library use and give the Library District complete redundancy at its backup site in case a catastrophic communication breakdown hits the District’s main network site. When completed, the project will allow the District to keep its facilities, web presence, and contract libraries operating. Also, the increase in capacity is required to run the Library Information System for major client libraries coming onboard in late 2009. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Library District Tech Phase 2 project is to expand capacity of the network and create total redundancy for the District network for our customers and the client libraries within Maricopa County for whom we provide library services. Strategic Goals Addressed Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Strategic Plan Programs Supported Public Library Service Strategic Plan Activities Supported Public Library Service Result Measures FY 2007-08 Year-To-Date Actual RESULT MEASURE Percent of customers who report that the Library’s collection of books and other materials met their needs FY 2007-08 Year-End Projected 92.5% Projected with Capital Improvement 92.5% 93.0% Funding/Cost Summary Previous Funding Source Actuals Library District Property Tax $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 07-08 $ $ - Year 1 FY 08-09 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Year 2 FY 09-10 $ $ - 104 Year 3 FY 10-11 $ $ - Year 4 FY 11-12 $ $ - Year 5 FY 12-13 $ $ - 5-Year Total $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Total Project $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Operating Cost Summary Year 1 FY 08-09 Year 2 FY 09-10 Year 3 FY 10-11 Year 4 FY 11-12 Year 5 FY 12-13 $ 10,517,043 9,760,433 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,106,525 10,353,761 346,579 $ 21,806,865 $ 11,495,253 10,716,143 358,709 $ 22,570,105 $ 11,897,587 11,091,208 371,264 $ 23,360,059 $ 12,314,003 11,479,400 384,258 $ 24,177,661 Post-Construction Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services $ 10,517,043 Supplies & Services 9,760,433 Capital Outlay 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,106,525 10,553,761 334,859 $ 21,995,145 $ 11,495,253 10,923,143 334,859 $ 22,753,255 $ 11,897,587 11,305,453 334,859 $ 23,537,899 $ 12,314,003 11,701,143 534,859 $ 24,550,005 $ $ $ $ $ FY 07-08 Current Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Net Operating Cost Increase (post less current) Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ Total $ - $ 105 - $ 200,000 200,000 $ 207,000 207,000 $ 214,245 214,245 $ 221,744 150,601 372,344 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Library District Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Motions Stadium District Approve the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Tentative Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for Stadium District in the amount of $11,906,186; and set a public hearing pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4232 to solicit public comment on the FY 2008-09 Budget for Monday, June 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM. 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s Adopted expenditure budget for 2008-09 is $11,906,186. Included in this amount is $2.4 million to begin Phase III of the Chase Field Suite Renovations and $1.5 million to resurface the main concourse flooring. The recommended revenue budget is $11,756,485. The stadium is now entering its 11th season of baseball, and the suite license agreements will expire this year. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility and the strategic goal of generating on-going revenue, the District is budgeting $2.4 million in capital funds from the Facility Reserves to renovate approximately 23 more of the 69 suites. This should complete the remodeling of all individual suites at Chase Field. Renovating these suites is expected to generate new long-term suite license agreements, which in turn will generate revenue to the District. Under the Agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks, the District receives 5% of the suite premiums, which currently amounts to more than $300,000 per year. There is an increase in expenditures in the Long Term Project Reserve Fund due to one-time costs included in the FY 2008-09 recommended budget. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Cactus League by Fiscal Year $6,498,814 $6,500,000 $6,286,155 $6,229,765 $6,024,416 Revenue $6,000,000 $5,450,000 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 FY 05 Actual FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 08 Forecasted FY 09 Recommended Fiscal Year Car rental surcharge revenues have been decreasing but have been more than adequate to cover the debt-service payment on the Cactus League bonds. Once the required debt-service payment has been made, and the District’s operations funded, the remaining revenue will be turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Maria K. Tutelman, Management & Budget Analyst Summary Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals • The District will provide continuous management oversight and obtain an independent assessment every three calendar years. Status: The Stadium District continues to follow up on items identified for further review in the Facility Assessment that was submitted June 2006. During FY 2007-08, the District completed the second phase of the suite renovations and replacement of the original video scoreboard and has three projects planned for FY 2008-09: upgrade flooring on the Main Concourse; construct Family Zone; and upgrade the Legacy Lounge. • By June 30, 2011, the District will increase facility revenues for non-baseball activities by 10% ($622,691 currently). Status: The District received $661,627 in non-baseball event revenue during FY 2007-08, a 6% increase from the baseline of $622,691. • By June 30, 2011, the District will increase use of the facility and public exposure to the facility through District and Day Use events for non-baseball activities by 5% (108 current). Status: During FY 2007-08, the District hosted 102 non-baseball events, a 6% decrease from the baseline of 108. Through the first quarter of FY 2008-09, the District hosted 35 nonbaseball events; this is compared to an average of 21 events per quarter in FY 2007-08. For FY 2008-09, the Day Use Event program is incorporated in the District Event program under the booking manager which should help increase facility use for non-baseball activities. 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity – All Funds FY 2006-07 ACTUAL REVENUE 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - EVENTS FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST FY 2008-09 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED % $ 593,193 593,193 $ 662,500 662,500 $ 1,162,500 1,162,500 $ 550,092 550,092 $ 550,000 550,000 $ (612,500) (612,500) -52.7% -52.7% 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 12,962,532 7,641,507 5,321,025 $ 11,266,367 7,185,094 4,081,273 $ 22,766,367 7,185,094 15,581,273 $ 22,272,417 7,497,423 14,774,994 $ 11,206,485 6,025,094 5,181,391 $ (11,559,882) (1,160,000) (10,399,882) -50.8% -16.1% -66.7% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT $ - $ 52,000 52,000 $ 52,000 52,000 $ 17,332 17,332 $ - $ (52,000) (52,000) -100.0% -100.0% $ 1,938 1,938 13,557,663 $ 11,980,867 $ 23,980,867 $ 1,160 1,160 22,841,001 $ 11,756,485 $ (12,224,382) -51.0% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS $ EXPENDITURES 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - EVENTS $ $ $ $ $ $ 35,698 35,698 $ 197,125 197,125 $ 197,127 197,127 $ 59,327 59,327 $ 104,054 104,054 $ 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 13,533,846 9,232,148 4,301,697 $ 11,956,199 6,197,150 5,759,049 $ 23,956,199 6,197,150 17,759,049 $ 22,500,996 6,578,649 15,922,347 $ 11,534,627 6,201,383 5,333,244 $ 12,421,572 (4,233) 12,425,805 51.9% -0.1% 70.0% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES $ 190,767 10,404 121,651 10,797 47,914 $ 179,352 11,274 113,725 4,980 49,373 $ 179,350 11,273 113,727 4,976 49,374 $ 266,338 9,011 200,438 11,129 45,760 $ 228,151 17,888 157,445 17,269 35,549 $ (48,801) (6,615) (43,718) (12,293) 13,825 -27.2% -58.7% -38.4% -247.0% 28.0% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 33,425 32,288 1,137 13,793,736 $ 39,677 37,943 1,734 12,372,353 $ 39,677 37,943 1,734 24,372,353 $ 40,437 38,795 1,642 22,867,098 $ 39,354 37,512 1,842 11,906,186 $ 323 431 (108) 12,466,167 0.8% 1.1% -6.2% 51.1% $ $ $ $ $ 93,073 93,073 47.2% 47.2% Sources FY 2006-07 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ SUBTOTAL $ 6,288,094 6,288,094 - FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 6,300,000 6,300,000 $ $ $ $ 52,000 $ 52,000 $ 52,000 52,000 $ $ 17,332 $ 17,332 $ $ 885,094 $ 4,743,773 5,628,867 $ 885,094 4,743,773 5,628,867 $ $ 1,268,818 $ 4,730,442 5,999,260 $ $ 11,980,867 $ 12,246,357 $ $ $ 12,000,000 12,000,000 $ $ 10,594,644 10,594,644 $ $ $ 23,980,867 $ 22,841,001 $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 13,557,662 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 13,557,663 $ $ $ 11,980,867 11,980,867 109 6,229,765 6,229,765 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 6,300,000 $ 6,300,000 $ 1,355,350 5,914,218 7,269,568 - FY 2007-08 FORECAST $ $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0652 - PROCEEEDS FROM FINANCING $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ FY 2007-08 REVISED $ $ 5,450,000 5,450,000 - ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ $ (850,000) (850,000) $ $ (52,000) -100.0% (52,000) -100.0% $ -1.1% 14.5% 12.0% -1.9% 875,094 5,431,391 6,306,485 $ (10,000) 687,618 677,618 11,756,485 $ (224,382) 11,756,485 -13.5% -13.5% $ $ (12,000,000) -100.0% (12,000,000) -100.0% $ (12,224,382) -51.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Uses FY 2006-07 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 273,787 $ 201 1,049 74,455 250 (83,861) 412,143 678,024 $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL $ 3,687 2,640 6,327 SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES SUBTOTAL $ 18,054 239,081 2,400 1,342,838 941 2,800 4,469 186 212 1,610,982 $ CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS $ 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ 3,220,559 8,277,844 11,498,404 $ TOTAL USES $ 13,793,736 $ $ FY 2007-08 REVISED 306,244 $ 89,149 (12,824) 78,119 460,688 $ 4,976 2,500 7,476 $ $ 65,000 1,169,284 1,540 2,500 832,468 3,850 5,150 800 600 2,081,192 $ $ $ 4,200,000 5,622,997 9,822,997 $ 12,372,353 $ FY 2007-08 FORECAST 306,244 $ 89,152 (12,824) 78,119 460,691 $ 4,974 2,500 7,474 $ $ 65,000 1,169,284 1,540 2,500 832,467 3,850 5,150 800 600 2,081,191 $ $ $ 16,200,000 5,622,997 21,822,997 $ 24,372,353 $ 110 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 232,526 $ 1,709 61,841 852 (12,827) 116,821 400,922 $ 5,373 877 6,250 $ $ 30,661 273,803 835 832 1,482,333 14,017 1,318 9,032 422 719 1,813,972 $ $ $ 14,939,822 5,706,132 20,645,954 $ 22,867,098 $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 279,883 $ 8,456 84,465 (11,073) 11,073 372,804 $ 4,500 2,500 7,000 $ $ 65,000 750,162 1,606 2,500 945,262 13,523 3,850 5,550 368 800 1,788,621 $ $ $ 3,900,000 5,837,761 9,737,761 $ 11,906,186 $ 26,361 (8,456) 4,687 (1,751) 67,046 87,887 474 474 8.6% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 13.7% 85.8% 19.1% 9.5% 0.0% 6.3% 419,122 (66) (112,795) (13,523) (400) 432 (200) 292,570 0.0% 35.8% 0.0% 0.0% -13.5% $ 12,300,000 (214,764) 12,085,236 0.0% 0.0% $ 12,466,167 51.1% $ 0.0% -7.8% 1 -33.3% 14.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources of Funds Sources of Funds (Excluding Fund Balance) $11,756,485 Sales Taxes 46% Miscellaneous & Interest 54% Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $11,906,186 Administrative Services 2% Entertainment Management 1% Financial Management 97% 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Budget Summary Consolidated Budget by Fund Type STADIUM DISTRICT FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET SPECIAL DEBT SERVICE FUND TYPE: CAPITAL SUBTOTAL ELIMINATIONS Value 7,504,359 $ 15,029,095 $ - $ 7,268,975 $ 255,761 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERTING SOURCES $ - $ 100,000 4,431,391 492,750 5,024,141 $ 5,450,000 $ 475,094 5,925,094 $ - $ 300,000 1,000,000 1,660,000 2,960,000 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 5,024,141 $ 5,925,094 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 372,804 $ 7,000 1,785,621 405,417 1,660,000 4,230,842 $ NON-RECURRING CAPITAL $ TOTAL NO N-RECURRING USES $ TOTAL $ 15,029,095 5,450,000 $ 875,094 5,431,391 2,152,750 13,909,235 $ - $ (2,152,750) (2,152,750) $ 5,450,000 875,094 5,431,391 11,756,485 2,960,000 $ 13,909,235 $ (2,152,750) $ 11,756,485 - $ 5,432,344 492,750 5,925,094 $ - $ 3,000 3,000 $ 372,804 $ 7,000 1,788,621 5,837,761 2,152,750 10,158,936 $ - $ (2,152,750) (2,152,750) $ 372,804 7,000 1,788,621 5,837,761 8,006,186 - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000 $ - $ - $ 3,900,000 3,900,000 TOTAL USES $ 4,230,842 $ 5,925,094 $ 3,903,000 $ 14,058,936 $ (2,152,750) $ 11,906,186 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 793,299 $ $ 2,957,000 $ 3,750,299 $ - $ 3,750,299 ENDING UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ 8,062,274 $ 255,761 $ 6,561,359 $ 14,879,394 $ - $ 14,879,394 BEG. UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. NON-RECURRING - Sources and Uses by Fund FY 2006-07 ACTUAL FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FY 2007-08 REVISED FY 2007-08 FORECAST FY 2008-09 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED % VARIANCE SOURCES 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 3,206,625 3,206,625 $ $ 2,054,076 2,054,076 $ $ 14,054,076 14,054,076 $ $ 12,623,429 12,623,429 $ $ 2,960,000 2,960,000 $ $ (11,094,076) (11,094,076) -78.9% -78.9% 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 DEBT SERVICE $ $ 6,838,435 6,838,435 $ $ 6,775,094 6,775,094 $ $ 6,775,094 6,775,094 $ $ 6,768,155 6,768,155 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ (850,000) (850,000) -12.5% -12.5% 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ $ $ 517,750 4,506,391 5,024,141 $ $ 1,201,000 4,358,977 5,559,977 $ $ 507,500 4,630,773 5,138,273 $ $ 507,500 4,630,773 5,138,273 $ $ 1,540,835 4,433,899 5,974,734 $ 10,250 (124,382) (114,132) 2.0% -2.7% -2.2% TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE $ 5,974,734 $ 5,138,273 $ 5,138,273 $ 5,559,977 $ 5,024,141 $ (114,132) -2.2% (2,152,750) $ 11,756,485 $ (166,174) (12,224,382) 8.4% -51.0% ELIMINATIONS TOTAL FUNDS USES 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ $ $ 3,206,859 3,206,859 $ $ 4,203,000 4,203,000 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 DEBT SERVICE $ $ 6,833,490 6,833,490 $ $ 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ 1,320,530 4,894,987 6,215,517 $ $ TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE $ 6,215,517 ELIMINATIONS $ TOTAL FUNDS $ (2,462,131) $ 13,557,663 $ (1,986,576) $ 23,980,867 $ (2,110,560) $ 22,841,001 $ $ $ 16,203,000 16,203,000 $ $ 14,933,976 14,933,976 $ $ 3,903,000 3,903,000 $ $ 12,300,000 12,300,000 75.9% 75.9% 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 6,512,394 6,512,394 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% 482,288 3,748,547 4,230,835 $ $ 482,288 3,748,554 4,230,842 $ $ 1,035,969 2,495,319 3,531,288 $ $ 482,288 3,748,547 4,230,835 $ $ $ (7) (7) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $ 4,230,835 $ 4,230,835 $ 3,531,288 $ 4,230,842 $ (7) 0.0% (2,462,131) $ 13,793,736 $ (1,986,576) $ 11,980,867 $ (1,986,576) $ 12,372,353 $ 112 (1,986,576) $ 24,372,353 $ (2,110,560) $ 22,867,098 $ (2,152,750) $ 11,906,186 $ 166,174 12,466,167 -8.4% 51.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District General Adjustments Budget Balancing: Technical adjustment reducing operating budget $7. Programs and Activities Entertainment Management Program The purpose of the Entertainment Management Program is to provide entertainment event services to the Maricopa County community and visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Program Results Measure Description % change in District Event revenue % change in Event participants % change in Day Use Event net revenue % change in Day Use Events % of District Event usage days booked FY 2007 Actual Not Reported Not Reported 9.3% 15.7% Not Reported FY 2008 Forecast 3.8% (46.3%) (58.5%) (63.0%) 28.3% FY 2009 Adopted 0.0% 0.0% (100.0%) (100.0%) 100.0% Variance Forecast - Adopted (3.8%) 46.3% (41.5%) (37.0%) 71.7% % Variance Forecast - Adopted (100.0%) (100.0%) 71.0% 58.8% 252.9% Activities that comprise this program include: • Events Events Activity The purpose of the Events Activity is to provide entertainment services to the Maricopa County community and its visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Mandates: Not mandated. 113 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Revenue Measure Description FY 2007 Actual Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 9.3% 15.7% 43 156,392 41,552 54 529,781 Not Reported % of District Event usage days booked % change in Event participants % change in District Event revenue % change in Day Use Event net revenue % change in Day Use Events # of booked District Event usage days # of District Event participants $ Day Use Event net revenue generated # of Day Use Events $ Event revenue generated # of expected available District Event usage days # of expected District event participants Not Reported $ Day use event net revenue expected to be Not Reported generated # of expected day use events $ District Event revenue to be generated 550,000 $ spent/ $ generated in District revenue $ 0.07 $ $ spent / # of booked District Event usage $ 830.28 $ days (Budget/# of booked District Event Usage Days) $ spent/# of District Event participants $ 0.23 $ FY 2008 Forecast 28.3% (46.3%) 3.8% (58.5%) (63.0%) 34 84,000 25,000 20 550,000 120 FY 2009 Variance % Variance Adopted Forecast - Adopted Forecast - Adopted 100.0% 71.7% 252.9% 0.0% 46.3% (100.0%) 0.0% (3.8%) (100.0%) (100.0%) (41.5%) 71.0% (100.0%) (37.0%) 58.8% 50 16 47.1% 84,000 0.0% (25,000) (100.0%) (20) (100.0%) 550,000 0.0% 120 0.0% 84,000 25,000 84,000 550,000 525,000 0.0% 2100.0% 38 550,000 0.11 $ 1,744.91 $ 550,000 0.19 $ 2,081.08 $ (38) (0.08) (336.17) (100.0%) 0.0% (75.4%) (19.3%) 0.71 $ 1.24 $ (0.53) (75.4%) (92) (52,376) 52,376 (92) 0.0% -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% 7,649 (52,376) (44,727) 6.8% 100.0% -75.4% $ spent/ $ Day Use Event revenue generated Total $ spent / # of day use events $ 0.86 $ 2.37 $ 661.15 $ 2,966.35 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS Total Sources $ 593,193 $ 41,552 (41,552) 593,193 $ 550,092 $ 52,376 (52,376) 550,092 $ 550,000 550,000 77,250 $ (41,552) 35,698 $ 111,703 $ (52,376) 59,327 $ 104,054 104,054 $ $ $ Expenditure 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 900 - ELIMINATIONS Total Uses • $ $ $ $ Performance measures for FY 2008-09 reflect the Day Use Event program incorporated in the District Event program. Financial Management Program The purpose of the Financial Management Program is to provide fiscal resources and asset management of Cactus League Facilities and Chase Field for the Board of Directors of the Stadium District, the community, and for its visitors, in order to ensure sound fiscal management of publicly owned facilities. Program Results Description % of items in compliance % of customer satisfied % change in revenue % increase in reserves % decrease in debt FY 2007 Actual Not Reported Not Reported (0.7%) (5.8%) Not Reported FY 2008 Forecast Not Reported 95.0% 10.8% 60.3% 5.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Fiscal Resource • Physical Asset Management 114 FY 2009 Adopted Not Reported 95.0% (12.8%) (88.0%) 4.9% Variance Forecast - Adopted % Variance Forecast - Adopted 0.0% (23.6%) (148.3%) (0.1%) 0.0% (218.2%) (245.9%) (1.3%) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fiscal Resource Activity The purpose of the Fiscal Resource Activity is to provide Financial Management Services for the Stadium District Board of Directors so that they can make sound financial decisions. Mandates: Not mandated. Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Measure Description % change in revenue % increase in reserves % decrease in debt $ generated in reserves $ paid down on debt (principal) $ generated in revenue $ expected to be paid down on debt $ reserves expected to be generated $ revenue expected to be generated $ spent/$ reserves generated $ spent/$ debt paid $ spent/$ revenue generated FY 2007 Actual (0.7%) (5.8%) Not Reported 2,475,148 Not Reported 7,400,752 2,820,000 1,557,411 Not Reported $ 3.73 $ Not Reported $ $ 1.247 $ FY 2008 Forecast 10.8% 60.3% 5.0% 939,013 2,960,000 11,788,867 2,960,000 939,013 11,839,258 7.01 $ 2.22 $ 0.558 $ FY 2009 Adopted (12.8%) (88.0%) 4.9% 1,300,000 3,105,000 10,856,485 3,105,000 1,300,000 10,434,704 4.72 1.97 0.565 Variance % Variance Forecast - Adopted Forecast - Adopted (23.6%) (218.2%) (148.3%) (245.9%) (0.1%) (1.3%) 360,987 38.4% 145,000 4.9% (932,382) (7.9%) 145,000 4.9% 360,987 38.4% (1,404,554) (11.9%) $ 2.29 32.7% $ 0.25 11.2% $ (0.007) (1.2%) Revenue 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERV 900 - ELIMINATIONS Total Sources $ 1,540,835 $ 162,768 6,838,435 1,520,048 (2,420,579) 7,641,507 $ 1,201,000 $ 111,203 6,768,155 505,865 (1,088,800) 7,497,423 $ 517,750 $ 75,000 5,925,094 (492,750) 6,025,094 $ (683,250) (36,203) (843,061) (505,865) 596,050 (1,472,329) -56.9% -32.6% -12.5% -100.0% -54.7% -19.6% 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERV 900 - ELIMINATIONS Total Uses $ 1,318,552 $ 3,500,685 6,833,490 (2,420,579) 9,232,148 $ 1,031,630 $ 120,425 6,512,394 3,000 (1,088,800) 6,578,649 $ 480,412 $ 288,627 5,925,094 (492,750) 6,201,383 $ 551,218 (168,202) 587,300 3,000 (596,050) 377,266 53.4% -139.7% 9.0% 100.0% 54.7% 5.7% Expenditure Physical Asset Management Activity The purpose of the Physical Asset Management Activity is to provide oversight of Chase Field maintenance and use agreements for the users of Chase Field so that they can enjoy a safe and well maintained facility and be protected from future capital repair expenditures to Chase Field by increasing capital reserves. Mandates: Not mandated. 115 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description % of customer satisfied % of items in compliance Number of satisfied customers Number of items in compliance Total number of expected customers Total number of compliance items $ Total activity expenditure per item in compliance FY 2007 Actual Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported FY 2008 Forecast 95.0% Not Reported 2,400,507 Not Reported 2,400,507 Not Reported Not Reported FY 2009 Variance % Variance Adopted Forecast - Adopted Forecast - Adopted 95.0% 0.0% 0.0% Not Reported 2,514,000 113,493 4.7% Not Reported 2,514,000 113,493 4.7% Not Reported Not Reported Revenue 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 3,677,938 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERV 1,643,087 900 - ELIMINATIONS Not Reported Total Sources $ 5,321,025 $ $ 3,680,350 $ 12,064,028 (969,384) 14,774,994 $ 3,881,391 $ 2,960,000 (1,660,000) 5,181,391 $ 201,041 (9,104,028) (690,616) (9,593,603) 5.5% -75.5% 71.2% -64.9% 1,960,755 $ 14,930,976 (969,384) 15,922,347 $ 3,090,244 $ 3,903,000 (1,660,000) 5,333,244 $ (1,129,489) 11,027,976 690,616 10,589,103 -57.6% 73.9% -71.2% 66.5% Expenditure 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 1,094,838 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERV 3,206,859 900 - ELIMINATIONS Not Reported Total Uses $ 4,301,697 • $ $ Compliance was not clearly identified in the current strategic plan; therefore, it is not currently being tracked. The Stadium District’s strategic plan is currently in the process of being updated. Base Adjustment • Increase Non-Operating Expenditure budget $1,500,000 in the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450) for non-recurring expenses to upgrade the Stadium’s main concourse flooring as recommended by an independent assessment on facility maintenance. • Increase Non-Operating Expenditure budget $2,400,000 in the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450) for non-recurring expenses to renovate Stadium suites as recommended by an independent assessment on facility maintenance. 116 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax In FY 1994-95, State Legislation allowed the Stadium District to collect a special 0.25% sales tax for two years for the construction of the Chase Field. $238,000,000 of the $253,000,000 total cost to construct Chase Field was funded through the use of the special sales tax levy. The District obtained a loan from the Diamondbacks for the remainder of the total cost which was paid off in June of 2007. The car rental sales tax established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District bonds. The car rental surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Tourism and Sport Authority (AZTSA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Fiscal Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Special Sales Tax Stadium District Stadium District Major League Car Rental Baseball Surcharge $ 5,326,147 $ 96,058,302 5,443,369 35,997,339 5,400,000 NA 5,722,238 NA 5,637,184 NA 5,536,163 NA 4,865,038 NA 5,556,717 NA 6,024,416 NA 6,498,814 NA 6,288,093 NA * 6,229,765 NA ** 5,450,000 NA *Forecasted **Budget 117 Total $ 101,384,449 41,440,708 5,400,000 5,722,238 5,637,184 5,536,163 4,865,038 5,556,717 6,024,416 6,498,814 6,288,093 6,229,765 5,450,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include payments made under the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization, naming rights fees, facility use charges and interest earnings. The chart at the right illustrates the miscellaneous revenues from FY 2001-02 through the FY 2008-09 Budget. Other Financing Sources Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 * ** Miscellaneous Revenue $ 4,953,957 5,071,762 4,916,724 5,276,945 6,000,467 7,269,570 5,966,558 6,306,485 * Projected Actual ** Budget Other Financing Sources solely comprise Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. A portion of the car rental surcharge revenue from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) is transferred to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) to support Cactus League operations Additionally, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) along with amounts associated with loan repayments. These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds will be utilized to maintain and improve the facility. Fund Transfers $4,485,379 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,066,807 $1,986,576 $2,152,750 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,813,912 $1,372,050 $1,500,000 $1,003,599 $1,000,000 $500,000 $2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 118 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2007-08. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated,” which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. The Stadium District has no fund balance designations at this time. The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for FY 2008-09 begins with audited actual fund balance information at the end of FY 2006-07, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The “unreserved fund balance” is used. Beginning Fund Balance Summary STADIUM DISTRICT FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET SOURCES: USES: FUND UNDESIG. BEG. FUND BALANCE SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 3,079,219 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS 4,189,756 SPECIAL REVENUE - OTHER $ 7,268,975 DEBT SERVICE 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 $ DEBT SERVICE $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ OPERATING NON RECURRING OPERATING NON RECURRING $ $ $ $ $ 517,750 4,506,391 5,024,141 255,761 255,761 $ $ 7,504,359 $ ELIMINATIONS $ - TOTAL $ 15,029,095 $ - $ 482,288 3,748,554 4,230,842 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ - $ $ 2,960,000 $ - $ $ (2,152,750) $ - $ (2,152,750) $ $ 11,756,485 - $ $ 119 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ - $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ - $ $ 3,000 $ 8,006,186 $ 3,900,000 3,900,000 UNDESIG. ENDING FUND BALANCE $ $ $ $ 35,462 757,837 793,299 - 2,957,000 3,750,299 $ $ 3,114,681 4,947,593 8,062,274 $ $ 255,761 255,761 $ 6,561,359 $ - $ 14,879,394 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 507,500 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 507,500 $ $ Subtotal $ - $ - FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ 482,288 $ 507,500 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Car Rental Surcharge Fund Transfer from Debt Fund (370) $ - $ 10,250 FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ 482,288 $ 0.0% 517,750 2.0% TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Employee Health/Dental Plan Changes (12 months) Retirement Contributions FY 2008-09 Pay for Performance FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 Ballpark Operations Fund (253) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 3,748,547 $ 4,630,773 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 3,748,547 $ 4,630,773 FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ 3,748,547 $ 4,630,773 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Program Revenue Volume Change Other Reductions Stadium Net Operating Fund Transfer to Long Term Reserve Fund (450) $ Subtotal $ FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Budget Balancing Adjustment FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ 3,748,547 $ $ Subtotal $ 7 7 $ $ $ FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 120 - $ (155,924) 155,924 - $ 3,748,554 $ 0.0% 3,748,554 $ (124,382) (124,382) 4,506,391 4,506,391 -2.7% 4,506,391 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 6,775,094 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 6,775,094 FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ 5,925,094 $ 6,775,094 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Decrease $ Car Rental Surcharge Fund Transfer to Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Other Base Adjustments Subtotal $ - $ 10,250 (10,250) - $ (850,000) (850,000) FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ 5,925,094 $ 0.0% 5,925,094 -12.5% FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 121 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 4,203,000 $ 2,054,076 MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Repayment of Video Board and Control Room Renovations Chase Field Suite Renovation Project Phase II $ $ Subtotal $ 10,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 $ 10,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 $ 16,203,000 $ 14,054,076 FY 2007-08 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Non-Recurring Expenditure Detail Suite Renovation Resurface Main Concourse Flooring Scoreboard Replacement Diamondbacks Donation/Chase Field Video Boards Diamondbacks Donation/Suite Conversion at Chase Field $ Subtotal $ (1,000,000) $ (1,200,000) (2,000,000) (10,000,000) (2,000,000) (16,200,000) $ (10,000,000) (2,000,000) (12,000,000) FY 2008-09 BUDGET TARGET $ 3,000 $ 2,054,076 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS: Program Revenue Volume Increase Stadium Net Operating Fund Transfer to Long Term Reserve $ $ Subtotal $ - $ 750,000 155,924 905,924 FY 2008-09 REQUESTED BUDGET $ 3,000 $ 2,960,000 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PERCENT CHANGE FROM TARGET AMOUNT $ 3,000 $ 0.0% 2,960,000 44.1% NON-OPERATING Ballpark Flooring (BPFL) Main Concourse Reflooring Project Ballpark Suite Rennovations (BPSR) Chase Field Suite Renovation Project Phase III $ 1,500,000 $ 2,400,000 FY 2008-09 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET FY 2008-09 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET 122 - $ 3,900,000 $ - $ 3,903,000 $ 2,960,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt (2) Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2007 Year Ending June 30 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds Stadium District contractual obligations Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities $57,225,000 $55,225,000 7,888,888 6,428,888 0 0 $65,113,888 $61,653,888 $52,735,000 $50,050,000 4,428,888 2,428,888 0 0 $57,163,888 $52,478,888 $47,230,000 0 978,394 $48,208,394 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. 123 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2007 Year Ending June 30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 – 17 2018 – 19 Total Principal $ 2,960,000 3,105,000 3,260,000 3,390,000 3,570,000 20,920,000 10,025,000 $ 47,230,000 Interest $ 2,462,344 2,314,344 2,159,094 2,028,694 1,850,718 6,185,012 815,388 $ 17,815,594 Total Debt Service $ 5,422,344 5,419,344 5,419,094 5,418,694 5,420,718 27,105,012 10,840,388 $ 65,045,594 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING BY ISSUE As of June 30, 2007 Bond Issue Total Stadium District Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Amount $ 47,230,000 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Interest Principal $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 FY FY 08 -0 9 09 FY 10 10 FY 11 11 FY 12 12 FY 13 13 FY 14 14 FY 15 15 FY 16 16 FY 17 17 FY 18 18 FY 19 19 -2 0 $0 124 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for Maricopa County. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of County – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the County, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation bond ratings of corporate/municipal Fitch Moody’s Standard Poor’s Premium quality AAA Aaa AAA High quality AA Aa AA Medium quality A A A Medium grade, lower quality BBB Baa BBB Predominantly speculative BB Ba BB Speculative, low grade B B B Poor to default CCC Caa CCC Highest speculation CC Ca CC Lowest quality, no interest C C C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DDD DD DD D D & Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. 125 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Fitch Stadium District Revenue Bonds Date Date Date Rating Rating Standard & Rating Assigned Moody's Assigned Poor's Assigned Aaa (1) AAA (1) (1) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating. Stadium District Loans Payable On July 25, 2006, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the enhancement of the sound system at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $679,295 of the funding for the enhancement; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over the next two years, ending December 2008. On January 23, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the renovation of suites at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $537,723 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over the next four years, ending December 2010. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2007 Year Ending June 30 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Principal $ 220,335 399,577 179,241 179,241 $ 978,394 126 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Stadium District Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Special Districts Special Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts Secondary Roll DIST. NO. DISTRICT NAME LEVY PURPOSE K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv Bond Interest Bond redemption ESTIMATED 2007-08 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 2007-08 1,480 1,480 3,076 3,076 4,556 4,556 2008-09 LESS 2008-09 BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT 1,314 0 1,314 3,040 0 3,040 4,353 0 4,353 K-96 Central Ave Bond Interest Bond redemption 1,911 4,916 6,826 1,911 4,916 6,826 772 17,148 17,920 0 0 0 772 17,148 17,920 K-98 Billings Street Bond Interest Bond redemption 47 1,049 1,096 47 1,049 1,096 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K-100 Marquerite Drive Bond Interest Bond redemption 931 4,283 5,214 931 4,283 5,214 385 0 385 0 0 0 385 0 385 K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest Bond redemption 2,829 6,006 8,835 2,829 6,006 8,835 2,349 6,006 8,355 0 0 0 2,349 6,006 8,355 192nd Ave. Avenida del Sol Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street 31st Avenue General General General General General General General Subtotal 740 265 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,675 34,866 171,546 740 265 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,675 34,866 171,546 420 210 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,205 0 135,835 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 420 210 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,205 0 135,835 Total $198,073 $198,073 $166,849 $0 $166,849 28548 28532 28795 28529 28793 28835 38014 127 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies Secondary Roll 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 2,523 2,733 8,812 1,086 19,403 9,708 794 17,538 2,493 4,391 5,816 5,108 217 984 3,823 5,283 2,173 9,703 3,514 3,672 6,643 3,596 4,421 652 639 7,815 1,545 11,454 855 5,414 855 7,965 6,494 10,278 13,906 1,458 1,923 10,252 3,259 23,914 2,018 3,010 3,270 8,953 1,100 22,275 9,857 813 20,923 2,534 4,451 5,915 6,124 220 998 3,878 5,366 2,200 9,835 3,565 4,399 7,827 3,646 4,481 660 652 7,918 1,830 11,609 866 5,502 866 8,071 6,581 10,427 14,153 1,477 1,948 12,357 3,300 28,750 2,050 128 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 600 1,329,308 0.0451 2,160 1,918,100 0.1126 9,173 3,120,408 0.2940 1,216 435,200 0.2794 25,071 13,229,074 0.1895 10,816 3,493,250 0.3096 744 616,180 0.1207 23,926 4,486,174 0.5333 2,658 1,319,158 0.2015 4,547 1,667,645 0.2727 5,784 1,324,640 0.4366 5,950 3,398,850 0.1751 253 6,915,904 0.0037 1,007 969,230 0.1039 4,136 2,530,771 0.1634 5,927 2,749,438 0.2156 2,011 664,507 0.3026 10,240 2,399,629 0.4267 3,580 1,782,900 0.2008 4,629 1,475,800 0.3137 8,611 2,415,005 0.3566 3,985 1,099,858 0.3623 4,396 6,031,456 0.0729 632 1,447,658 0.0437 655 413,050 0.1586 7,837 5,746,813 0.1364 1,762 501,038 0.3517 11,493 9,089,054 0.1264 884 571,558 0.1547 5,441 4,012,050 0.1356 1,035 346,650 0.2986 8,025 4,756,600 0.1687 6,477 3,987,874 0.1624 10,408 5,767,857 0.1804 14,016 7,031,118 0.1993 1,472 1,861,250 0.0791 1,876 356,547 0.5262 13,041 2,994,614 0.4355 3,208 1,108,992 0.2893 27,737 7,004,504 0.3960 2,107 913,058 0.2308 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Special Districts Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 3,443 3,773 22,440 1,086 1,266 6,143 3,525 731,915 11,254 2,173 2,486 186 2,824 17,713 2,282 5,189 4,060 13,893 9,380 2,607 1,969 2,847 1,710 20,323 2,672 21,073 22,098 2,607 4,344 2,722 2,557 6,411 12,517 10,281 16,329 7,169 4,497 13,924 13,000 8,745 125,904 4,393 10,434 31,023 19,059 3,502 3,829 26,896 1,100 1,286 6,225 4,215 875,238 11,405 2,200 2,524 188 2,860 21,233 2,321 5,364 4,112 16,825 11,243 2,640 2,004 3,403 1,731 24,468 3,203 21,547 26,577 2,640 4,400 3,260 2,592 6,493 13,299 10,427 19,554 7,283 5,375 16,686 15,580 10,478 150,533 5,265 12,554 37,180 22,836 129 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 3,421 1,156,924 0.2957 4,412 1,500,834 0.2940 26,560 6,044,160 0.4394 1,159 453,600 0.2555 1,305 491,650 0.2654 6,203 4,274,372 0.1451 4,585 731,432 0.6269 885,456 318,578,209 0.2779 11,220 5,814,500 0.1930 2,195 759,208 0.2891 2,644 1,104,440 0.2394 120 614,844 0.0195 2,644 1,149,293 0.2301 21,534 4,579,395 0.4702 2,516 587,208 0.4285 5,699 1,635,158 0.3485 4,541 1,165,266 0.3897 15,929 4,087,598 0.3897 10,981 3,181,744 0.3451 2,868 1,134,250 0.2529 1,929 464,316 0.4154 3,804 2,303,671 0.1651 1,880 921,950 0.2039 24,423 5,427,888 0.4500 3,287 511,058 0.6432 22,549 4,689,782 0.4808 26,509 6,449,826 0.4110 2,741 830,819 0.3299 4,449 928,961 0.4789 2,909 512,500 0.5676 2,513 974,938 0.2578 6,461 4,201,903 0.1538 13,867 3,455,189 0.4013 10,187 5,065,214 0.2011 18,319 5,893,249 0.3108 7,622 2,280,924 0.3342 5,921 533,540 1.1098 15,502 4,090,524 0.3790 14,727 4,510,183 0.3265 10,440 3,176,140 0.3287 149,084 53,514,063 0.2786 5,388 2,300,900 0.2342 12,250 3,290,089 0.3723 36,581 12,015,644 0.3044 23,945 6,981,351 0.3430 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 DESCRIPTION Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Special Districts Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 19,529 2,154 4,433 22,429 3,206 9,189 3,191 3,206 27,377 4,060 2,422 1,069 1,496 3,861 3,636 6,333 6,606 900 3,733 18,796 17,666 5,802 1,710 15,048 4,344 1,086 6,541 1,738 11,098 3,383 3,268 2,858 8,802 1,724 7,189 10,311 3,176 18,767 25,346 10,159 5,888 1,710 4,562 16,047 9,013 23,484 2,187 5,312 27,062 2,814 11,003 3,298 3,246 33,097 4,112 2,990 1,082 1,515 3,954 4,342 6,915 6,815 914 4,584 22,606 21,205 6,949 1,731 15,309 4,400 1,100 6,639 1,760 11,246 3,430 3,352 1,393 10,465 1,762 7,773 10,674 3,391 22,511 30,631 12,158 7,090 1,731 4,620 19,239 10,777 130 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 23,259 6,126,846 0.3796 2,405 788,850 0.3049 6,200 1,570,145 0.3949 27,061 6,425,496 0.4212 2,556 2,894,750 0.0883 10,539 4,172,517 0.2526 3,509 1,199,380 0.2926 3,291 334,819 0.9829 34,142 8,037,256 0.4248 4,082 595,740 0.6852 2,930 1,372,281 0.2135 1,079 489,700 0.2203 1,471 371,267 0.3962 4,515 1,189,558 0.3796 4,742 1,396,656 0.3395 7,143 1,839,649 0.3883 6,868 1,722,987 0.3986 946 359,800 0.2629 4,791 1,403,408 0.3414 22,769 5,812,672 0.3917 21,803 5,485,191 0.3975 7,924 5,321,073 0.1489 1,723 617,758 0.2789 14,343 5,940,463 0.2414 4,281 2,977,774 0.1438 1,106 369,775 0.2991 7,336 1,790,024 0.4098 1,725 537,600 0.3209 11,104 3,766,800 0.2948 3,376 1,160,253 0.2910 3,502 1,188,628 0.2946 796 1,478,275 0.0538 11,193 1,533,428 0.7299 1,994 470,279 0.4240 8,599 3,878,941 0.2217 10,887 2,498,304 0.4358 3,878 1,172,600 0.3307 24,089 6,040,789 0.3988 29,876 7,127,650 0.4192 11,820 5,515,198 0.2143 7,414 3,376,812 0.2196 1,962 535,650 0.3663 5,058 2,205,474 0.2293 17,852 4,040,866 0.4418 10,935 2,270,007 0.4817 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 DESCRIPTION Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Special Districts Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 19,681 2,905 3,708 4,909 1,927 6,114 13,947 2,133 5,601 6,677 1,710 7,569 3,472 11,404 1,706 1,912 4,063 3,850 10,724 2,793 5,561 11,756 11,937 7,746 4,932 9,829 2,100 5,461 2,271 7,217 1,310 2,140 6,413 2,695 1,652 2,396 28,557 17,216 11,962 7,917 6,679 5,856 1,923 1,283 4,789 23,590 3,482 3,756 5,050 1,973 6,288 14,328 2,198 5,699 6,864 1,758 7,705 3,518 11,680 1,756 1,940 4,173 3,954 11,013 2,830 5,736 12,075 12,351 7,959 5,057 10,085 2,159 5,535 2,332 6,925 1,333 2,195 6,581 2,776 1,674 2,429 29,257 17,661 12,300 8,129 6,840 5,932 1,973 1,316 4,840 131 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 21,893 5,150,598 0.4251 3,472 694,040 0.5003 3,787 2,501,305 0.1514 5,117 3,208,237 0.1595 1,950 1,714,950 0.1137 6,784 3,412,858 0.1988 15,018 8,453,808 0.1776 2,150 1,559,400 0.1379 6,102 3,752,266 0.1626 7,028 3,986,703 0.1763 1,838 2,680,410 0.0686 8,324 6,105,958 0.1363 3,606 1,265,650 0.2849 11,779 8,309,397 0.1418 1,704 1,317,150 0.1294 1,811 597,258 0.3032 4,179 3,237,470 0.1291 4,040 2,768,383 0.1459 11,211 6,096,833 0.1839 2,834 2,323,843 0.1220 6,088 1,969,346 0.3091 12,257 7,572,863 0.1619 13,010 8,011,466 0.1624 8,307 5,701,893 0.1457 5,243 2,876,282 0.1823 10,256 7,706,829 0.1331 2,160 884,154 0.2443 5,841 1,664,206 0.3510 2,371 1,524,416 0.1555 7,255 3,684,870 0.1969 1,375 999,500 0.1376 2,270 1,673,750 0.1356 6,663 3,583,545 0.1859 3,011 1,841,907 0.1635 1,786 568,295 0.3143 2,497 844,460 0.2957 30,203 18,145,890 0.1664 18,494 10,832,516 0.1707 12,590 15,433,358 0.0816 8,448 4,191,890 0.2015 6,927 4,419,650 0.1567 6,067 4,279,710 0.1418 2,149 1,296,190 0.1658 1,266 874,450 0.1448 5,022 3,517,558 0.1428 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Special Districts Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 6,168 1,706 1,282 12,003 4,361 1,923 2,133 30,022 13,416 6,839 4,696 2,741 25,213 22,184 10,747 10,212 12,295 9,478 2,137 6,614 40,763 30,496 3,641 3,898 281,304 4,097 6,146 5,026 31,176 2,515 7,801 35,206 8,943 19,888 31,582 7,424 10,760 11,445 28,078 2,835 3,836 5,541 8,602 36,948 19,573 6,256 1,758 1,299 12,289 4,422 1,948 2,162 38,165 16,977 6,925 4,768 2,780 31,215 27,193 13,491 12,242 14,938 11,961 2,164 6,702 48,710 37,008 4,358 4,660 337,986 4,159 6,242 6,010 37,467 2,623 9,429 42,303 9,067 23,828 38,128 7,538 12,941 13,703 33,808 2,878 3,888 6,419 10,450 44,363 23,813 132 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 6,336 1,872,882 0.3383 1,928 914,400 0.2108 1,401 399,076 0.3511 12,689 6,307,916 0.2012 4,270 1,713,233 0.2492 1,792 507,266 0.3533 2,150 990,114 0.2171 40,601 8,909,582 0.4557 17,711 4,921,605 0.3599 6,961 2,368,872 0.2939 4,738 1,826,797 0.2594 2,916 561,400 0.5194 32,149 7,761,669 0.4142 27,772 6,285,375 0.4419 14,379 3,674,510 0.3913 11,838 3,200,873 0.3698 13,930 4,012,507 0.3472 11,881 2,698,537 0.4403 2,070 748,441 0.2766 6,629 2,251,364 0.2944 53,579 10,661,681 0.5025 36,518 8,077,173 0.4521 4,157 1,970,908 0.2109 4,874 928,164 0.5251 347,301 51,244,813 0.6777 4,087 620,676 0.6585 6,217 2,103,274 0.2956 6,323 1,919,078 0.3295 35,659 8,983,952 0.3969 2,119 757,008 0.2799 8,648 2,612,956 0.3310 42,719 9,921,906 0.4306 9,087 3,077,115 0.2953 25,365 4,494,462 0.5644 36,457 8,539,525 0.4269 7,465 2,356,998 0.3167 13,800 2,237,306 0.6168 13,801 5,253,381 0.2627 35,991 6,071,905 0.5927 2,669 731,165 0.3650 4,094 896,728 0.4565 6,658 995,788 0.6686 9,827 4,141,381 0.2373 45,782 11,425,188 0.4007 22,237 5,933,988 0.3747 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget 2007-08 BUDGET DIST # 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23578 23579 23580 23595 23596 13435 23104 DESCRIPTION Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 RUSSELL RANCH PH 1 Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vista Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 Litchfield Vista Views Special Districts Estimated 2008-09 BUDGET 9,635 37,187 19,238 8,903 14,293 6,513 2,824 7,765 17,966 15,594 14,209 3,419 7,425 3,288 14,818 9,396 5,043 2,616 12,597 1,902 7,732 494,031 1,137 5,552 72,804 38,208 1,496 11,582 17,663 3,270 40,646 1,000 3,954 0 7,526 42,671 109,863 21,840 8,362 0 0 11,992 44,574 21,825 9,017 14,485 6,597 2,860 9,304 21,722 18,695 17,242 3,462 8,885 3,938 17,781 9,517 6,050 3,131 15,065 2,277 7,858 725,460 1,176 6,570 87,795 45,315 1,515 13,727 20,959 3,891 48,176 1,184 5,941 61,611 7,329 41,644 99,582 25,534 4,703 18,284 1,617 4,022,302 4,850,627 2,093 1,668 2,162 2,029 133 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2008 2008 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 11,630 3,214,370 0.3618 45,964 10,175,730 0.4517 26,068 12,543,395 0.2078 8,639 3,583,912 0.2410 13,899 5,670,487 0.2451 6,423 3,660,993 0.1754 2,760 1,283,578 0.2150 9,084 3,627,367 0.2504 21,852 6,401,209 0.3414 17,310 3,697,455 0.4682 17,074 4,115,089 0.4149 3,653 2,489,550 0.1467 9,120 4,259,042 0.2141 3,915 1,421,740 0.2754 17,465 4,049,072 0.4313 9,414 3,527,906 0.2668 4,928 3,016,421 0.1634 3,448 2,293,350 0.1503 17,569 5,179,650 0.3392 2,408 2,581,050 0.0933 8,212 1,907,450 0.4305 861,513 184,010,564 0.4682 1,287 908,260 0.1417 7,422 5,648,748 0.1314 87,793 30,274,731 0.2900 51,045 31,796,158 0.1605 1,605 1,238,599 0.1296 15,345 9,250,118 0.1659 23,618 18,191,198 0.1298 4,430 5,938,510 0.0746 52,582 34,067,152 0.1543 1,228 3,861,800 0.0318 8,558 3,553,850 0.2408 61,611 7,273,630 0.8470 8,095 4,098,500 0.1975 50,202 20,451,009 0.2455 115,775 35,881,186 0.3227 27,977 21,327,530 0.1312 5,113 7,105,350 0.0720 18,284 4,061,472 0.4502 1,617 1,035,060 0.1562 5,083,372 2,294 2,085 2008 SQUARE FOOTAGE 272,754 1,351,641 0.8411 0.1543 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Flood Control District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Property Taxes: The budget will advance the goal of reducing property tax rates by continuing the self-imposed limits on the District property tax levy and by controlling expenditure increases. • In order to protect taxpayers from tax increases resulting from high valuation increases, the FY 2007-08 Flood Control District secondary tax levy on properties taxed in FY 2006-07 will increase by no more than 2%, which is equivalent to limits on primary property taxes. • The targeted overall increase in operating expenditures should be less than the combined rate of increase in population and inflation (as measured by the GDP Price Deflator), currently estimated at 7.0% for FY 2007-08. To achieve this target, the Office of Management and Budget is directed to identify possible savings by working with District staff and advisory boards and recommend corresponding changes to the budget. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. 134 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized cost of FY 2006-07 approved Results Initiatives. 2. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 3. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 4. Items required by State law. 5. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 6. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. 135 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Library District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Property Taxes: The budget will advance the goal of reducing property tax rates by continuing the self-imposed limits on the District property tax levy and by controlling expenditure increases. • In order to protect taxpayers from tax increases resulting from high valuation increases, the FY 2007-08 Flood Control District secondary tax levy on properties taxed in FY 2006-07 will increase by no more than 2%, which is equivalent to limits on primary property taxes. • The targeted overall increase in operating expenditures should be less than the combined rate of increase in population and inflation (as measured by the GDP Price Deflator), currently estimated at 7.0% for FY 2007-08. To achieve this target, the Office of Management and Budget is directed to identify possible savings by working with District staff and advisory boards and recommend corresponding changes to the budget. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized cost of FY 2006-07 approved Results Initiatives. 2. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 3. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 4. Items required by State law. 136 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments 5. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 6. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. 137 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Stadium District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the strategic goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 2. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 3. Items required by State law. 4. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 5. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. 138 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2008-09 Adopted Budget Attachments Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. Minimum Fund Balances for Cash Flow Purposes Each year, the Department of Finance, in collaboration with the Office of Management and Budget, calculates the minimum fund balances needed for the upcoming fiscal year necessary to avoid shortterm borrowing (such as Line of Credit, Tax Anticipation Note, or Internal Borrowing Agreement) in the General Fund, Flood Control District, and Library District. OMB uses trend analysis to estimate revenue collection and spending patterns for each fund. In addition, the calculation model assumes growth commensurate with the Consumer Price Index. The model assumptions are re-examined each year and modified when necessary. Calculated minimum fund balance requirements for FY 2007-08 are listed in the table below, followed by fund-specific information. Fund Required Minimum Fund Balance Flood Control District $3,200,000 Library District $2,436,203 Flood Control District The Flood Control District has one fund available to finance its operational expenditures. The District utilizes a separate capital projects fund for its Capital Improvement Program, with expenditures supported by fund transfers from the Flood Control District’s operating fund. The Flood Control District operating fund’s principal source of revenue is a property tax. As a result, it shares the same pattern of fiscal low and high points as the County General Fund. For purposes of calculating the minimum fund balance, it is assumed that major intergovernmental revenues will be collected, and transfers to the capital projects fund will occur uniformly during the year. Library District Similar to the Flood Control District, the Library District only has one fund to finance its operations. The Library District’s principal source of revenue is a property tax, and has a fairly uniform spending pattern during the year. 139