Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Table of Contents Table of Contents Flood Control District Transmittal Letter Flood Control District Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals Budget Summary Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Capital Improvement Program 1 3 6 9 21 25 26 28 Library District Transmittal Letter Library District Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals Budget Summary Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation 61 62 64 67 68 73 74 Stadium District Transmittal Letter Stadium District Mission, Vision and Strategic Goals Budget Summary Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variances Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Debt Service 77 79 81 84 88 90 90 94 Special Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvements Levies 100 101 Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Flood Control District Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Library District Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Stadium District Minimum Fund Balance for Cash Flow Purposes i 108 110 112 114 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Table of Contents ii Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Fulton Brock, Chairman, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The recommended Fiscal Year 2007-08 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $97,250,609, which is $2,355,497 (2.5%) higher than the prior fiscal year’s budget. Increased expenditures are mainly due to higher spending in capital projects and operating activities such as floodplain enforcement, inspections, and planning. The budget also provides for a more focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so that properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains or floodways before building on the land takes place. Expenditures for capital projects have increased by $1,000,000 (1.7%) in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2003 Through FY 2008 $70,000,000 For the second consecutive year, in FY $61,000,000 $60,000,000 $58,006,298 2007-08 the Flood Control District will be $60,000,000 lowering its tax rate (from 0.2047 to $47,741,781 $50,000,000 $42,692,818 $40,773,261 0.1533). The District was directed by the $40,000,000 Board of Directors to implement a 2% levy $30,000,000 cap, excluding new construction, in order to protect taxpayers from tax increases $20,000,000 due to increased assessed property $10,000,000 values. The reduced rate results in a $property tax revenue budget of FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Adopted $69,683,115. Revenue increases are also expected in Fiscal Year 2007-08 as a result of increased permit issuances, licenses, and other regulatory services. In total, the Flood Control District expects to receive $91.9 million this year, which is $335,199 (0.4%) more than in Fiscal Year 2006-07. The recommended Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $1 million for the Flood Prone Properties Acquisition program. In all, the Flood Control District has 26 scheduled projects totaling $331 million in their five-year capital improvement plan. 1 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith County Manager On June 18, 2007, the Maricopa County Flood Control District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2007-08 budget totaling $96,884,484. This represents a $366,125 decrease from the recommended budget of $97,250,609 and was reduced for technical corrections to Public Works internal charges. On August 20, 2007 the Board of Supervisors adopted the tax rates. 2 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Jamie Rullo, Principal Management & Budget Analyst Organizational Chart Flood Control District Board of Directors County Manager Assistant County Manager Regional Development Services Agency Public Works Director Flood Control District Timothy S. Phillips, P.E., Chief Engineer & General Manager Executive Operations & Maintenance Land Management Regulatory Administration Engineering Information Technology Planning & Project Management Mission The mission of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is to provide flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation, and education to the people in Maricopa County so that they can reduce their risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding while enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The vision of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is that the people of Maricopa County and future generations will have the maximum amount of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multiple-use facilities that complement or enhance the beauty of our desert environment. 3 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Strategic Goals • By June 30, 2009, the Flood Control District will develop and implement a model for flood hazard risk mitigation that measures the amount of risk mitigated through actions taken by each of its programs in terms of the number of people and/or area of Maricopa County covered and cost per resident to provide that risk mitigation. Status: The District is making progress on developing a model for risk mitigation. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding activities in the Flood Hazard Identification Program. • Beginning in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 and for each year for the next 5 years, the Flood Control District will continue to identify flood and erosion hazard areas by annually delineating at least 5% of the existing (3,334) linear miles of undelineated watercourses and conducting studies on 5% of the total number of square miles (7,070) of watershed needing study. Status: In FY 2006-07 the District had 15 ongoing studies that involved the delineation of floodplains. There is an estimated 475 linear miles of floodplain delineation associated with these studies. By the end of the fiscal year, 330 linear miles (approximately 20 sq. mi.) from the 15 ongoing studies will be completed and available for regulatory purposes. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding the Floodplain Delineation Activity. • Beginning in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 and for each year for the next five years, the Flood Control District will continue to provide maximum flood hazard mitigation to the people who live and work in Maricopa County by annually completing 10% of the structural projects listed in the CIP plan. To the extent allowed by its enabling statutes, the District will include provisions for multiple use opportunities incorporating the principles of landscape architecture and land use planning in their siting, planning, and design. Status: During FY 2006-07 the District and its project partners were working on twenty-six (26) structural projects. Fifteen (15) were in various stages of design, seven (7) were in various stages of construction, four (4) had multiple phases with some phases still in design while other phases were in construction, and one (1) project was completed (0.3% projects completed to date). Of these projects, sixteen (16) are being or have been designed with landscaping and/or, where possible, multi- use provisions. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding $61,000,000 in capital projects. • Beginning in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 and for each year for the next five years, the Flood Control District will continue to provide floodplain regulation compliance guidance, direction, permitting, and enforcement so that 100% of the structures permitted for building within delineated floodplains are in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and are not flooded during storm runoff events. Status: The District is making progress in meeting this goal. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding activities in the Flood Hazard Regulation Program. • Beginning in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 and for each year for the next 5 years, 50% of those who live in and visit Maricopa County will be exposed to flood hazard information, flood mitigation project information, and flood safety guidance through mass media and public education programs as measured by public meeting counts and PR Tracker. 4 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Status: In Fiscal Year 2006-07, 95.4% of Maricopa County residents were exposed to at least 10 media images about the risks of floods and flood hazards, or the District’s projects, studies, and activities that affect them. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding the Flood Hazard Education Program activities. • By December 31, 2007, the Flood Control District will have the requisite number of 500 points to increase its Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Community Rating System (CRS) rating from a level 5 to a level 4 thereby saving property owners in unincorporated Maricopa County an additional 5% on their annual flood insurance premiums. Status: The District submitted the annual recertification document for the FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) rating and is awaiting results. The District has also submitted revised floodplain regulations for FEMA’s review. The budget supports attainment of this goal by funding the Flood Hazard Regulation Program. 5 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Budget Summary Sources of Funds Sources of Funds $96,884,484 Permits, Fees & Fines 2% Miscellaneous & Interest 2% Fund Balances 20% Other Intergovernmental & Grants 15% Property Taxes, Penalties & Interest 61% Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $96,884,484 Information Technology 3% Flood Hazard Regulation 3% Administrative Services 5% Flood Hazard Education 1% Flood Hazard Identification 11% Flood Hazard Remediation 77% 6 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Revenue and Expenditures by Program and Activity FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION PROGRAM FENF - FLOODPLAIN ENFORCEMENT FINS - FLOODPLAIN INSPECTIONS FMAP - FLOODPLAIN MAP INFORMATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM MAINT $ $ $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED 159,735 800 3,059 0 157,235 24,946,603 19,909,710 5,036,893 $ 1,111,927 $ $ $ FY 2006-07 REVISED 250,000 250,000 42,256,000 21,106,000 21,150,000 $ 200,000 $ $ $ FY 2006-07 PROJECTED 250,000 250,000 20,000 20,000 22,827,002 21,106,001 1,721,001 $ 139,998 $ $ $ REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 296,407 122 296,122 8,536 8,536 19,089,995 17,464,568 1,625,427 $ 213,075 $ $ $ 1,004,000 4,000 1,000,000 4,000 4,000 18,863,300 17,042,874 1,820,426 $ 468,000 $ $ $ 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG $ 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM $ 289,079 $ - $ 40,000 $ 57,698 $ 602,000 $ 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS $ $ 61,286,213 87,793,558 $ $ 67,564,585 110,270,585 $ $ 67,564,585 90,841,585 $ $ 67,881,834 87,547,546 $ $ 70,582,697 91,523,997 $ $ $ 1,888,814 213,263 275,118 50,223 922,415 677,422 268,175 409,247 12,180,457 3,347,438 8,833,019 67,707,273 59,156,629 8,550,644 $ 2,310,595 52,103 471,193 68,200 1,342,390 2,161,383 1,494,867 666,516 10,263,124 2,378,474 7,884,650 84,348,863 72,577,282 11,771,581 $ 2,222,167 54,192 365,337 58,356 1,422,039 1,022,033 690,844 331,189 10,731,711 3,483,775 7,247,936 73,611,351 61,700,739 11,910,612 $ 2,340,841 116,103 370,192 55,317 1,441,468 1,214,506 873,940 340,566 11,164,312 3,465,671 7,698,641 72,937,422 61,608,978 11,328,444 $ 3,239,125 861,165 527,189 72,162 1,778,609 813,224 286,911 526,313 10,810,014 3,275,412 7,534,602 74,055,998 62,244,532 11,811,466 $ EXPENDITURES 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION PROGRAM FENF - FLOODPLAIN ENFORCEMENT FINS - FLOODPLAIN INSPECTIONS FMAP - FLOODPLAIN MAP INFORMATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD EDUCATION PROGRAM EDAY - PUBLIC OUTREACH MASM - MASS MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM MAINT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 754,000 301.6% 4,000 750,000 300.0% (16,000) -80.0% (16,000) -80.0% (3,963,702) -17.4% (4,063,127) -19.3% 99,425 5.8% 328,002 234.3% 562,000 1405.0% 3,018,112 682,412 4.5% 0.8% (1,016,958) -45.8% (806,973) -1489.1% (161,852) -44.3% (13,806) -23.7% (356,570) -25.1% 208,809 20.4% 403,933 58.5% (195,124) -58.9% (78,303) -0.7% 208,363 6.0% (286,666) -4.0% (444,647) -0.6% (543,793) -0.9% 99,146 0.8% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG $ 4,403,208 $ 3,036,673 $ 3,032,493 $ 3,040,551 $ 3,097,216 $ (64,723) -2.1% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM $ 2,041,033 $ 2,067,873 $ 2,095,119 $ 1,989,773 $ 2,785,963 $ (690,844) -33.0% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS $ $ 1,170,255 90,068,461 $ $ 1,466,899 105,655,410 $ $ 1,466,899 94,181,773 $ $ 1,395,554 94,082,959 $ $ 2,082,944 96,884,484 $ $ (616,045) (2,702,711) -42.0% -2.9% Revenue and Expenditures by Category FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 ADOPTED FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % REVENUE Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Miscellaneous Revenues Total Revenue EXPENDITURES Personal Services Supplies Services Other Financing Uses Capital Outlay Total Expenditures $ $ $ $ 61,173,495 3,641,058 19,444,200 3,534,805 87,793,558 $ 14,541,518 1,483,317 20,339,706 1,170,425 52,533,495 90,068,461 $ $ $ 67,096,622 1,000,000 21,291,213 20,882,750 110,270,585 $ 16,066,761 2,014,327 20,346,192 67,228,130 105,655,410 $ $ $ 67,096,622 1,571,000 21,291,213 882,750 90,841,585 $ 16,713,326 1,507,938 16,226,379 59,734,130 94,181,773 $ 7 $ $ 67,096,622 1,882,988 17,185,213 1,382,724 87,547,546 $ 16,593,176 1,586,250 16,198,955 59,704,578 94,082,959 $ $ $ 69,683,115 1,883,000 17,192,456 2,765,426 91,523,997 $ 16,420,205 2,658,264 18,060,666 59,745,349 96,884,484 $ $ $ 2,586,493 312,000 (4,098,757) 1,882,676 682,412 3.9% 19.9% -19.3% 213.3% 0.8% 293,121 (1,150,326) (1,834,287) (11,219) (2,702,711) 1.8% -76.3% -11.3% 0.0% -2.9% Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 ADOPTED FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS $ (258) $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 61,762,926 991 FLOOD CONTROL 87,793,815 900 ELIMINATIONS (61,762,926) TOTAL FUNDS $ 87,793,558 $ - $ 77,315,461 110,270,585 (77,315,461) 110,270,585 $ - $ - $ - $ 57,849,304 57,849,304 58,628,253 90,841,585 87,547,546 91,523,997 (57,849,304) (57,849,304) (58,628,253) 90,841,585 $ 87,547,546 $ 91,523,997 $ (778,949) 778,949 682,412 682,412 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS $ (259) $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 58,006,298 991 FLOOD CONTROL 93,825,349 900 ELIMINATIONS (61,762,926) TOTAL FUNDS $ 90,068,461 $ - $ 71,000,000 111,970,871 (77,315,461) 105,655,410 $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 61,000,000 92,031,077 91,932,263 94,512,737 (57,849,304) (57,849,304) (58,628,253) 94,181,773 $ 94,082,959 $ 96,884,484 $ 778,949 (1,000,000) (2,481,660) (2,702,711) % 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 0.8% -1.3% -1.7% -2.7% -2.9% Personnel by Program and Activity FY 2006-07 REVISED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % FY 2007-08 ADOPTED FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION PROGRAM FENF - FLOODPLAIN ENFORCEMENT FINS - FLOODPLAIN INSPECTIONS FMAP - FLOODPLAIN MAP INFORMATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD EDUCATION PROGRAM EDAY - PUBLIC OUTREACH MASM - MASS MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM MAINT 23.00 0.50 4.50 1.00 17.00 6.00 3.50 2.50 42.40 16.20 26.20 105.45 35.60 69.85 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG 28.00 17.00 7.00 - 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM TOTAL PROGRAMS 214.75 29.40 1.50 6.50 1.00 20.40 6.00 3.50 2.50 45.30 17.90 27.40 98.05 30.10 67.95 195.75 6.40 27.8% 1.00 200.0% 2.00 44.4% 0.0% 3.40 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.90 6.8% 1.70 10.5% 1.20 4.6% (7.40) -7.0% (5.50) -15.4% (1.90) -2.7% (11.00) -39.3% (7.00) -100.0% (19.00) -8.8% The FY 2006-07 revised FTE data above reflects budgeted positions as of February. Since then, the District has added 10 FTEs within their current expenditure appropriation by reallocating resources. Positions were added to the Floodplain Enforcement, Inspections, and Delineation activities to meet demand. This increase is offset by the transfer of 28.5 FTEs to the Public Works section in the Transportation Capital Project Fund. 8 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Mandated vs. Non-Mandated Expenditures $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 Thousands $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 PROJECTED MANDATED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED NON-MANDATED Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide the identification of, and alternative solutions to flood hazards, and flood warning data to public and private organizations so that they can incorporate knowledge of flood hazards in their plans within presently developed and future urban growth areas. Program Results FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT ADOPTED (Rev. - Adopted) Percent of square miles of Maricopa 18.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 0.0% County where planning studies were completed. Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Delineation • % 0.0% Flood Hazard Planning Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide a map of the physical boundaries of the area adjoining a watercourse that may be covered by floodwater during a flood so that the public is aware of the dangers inherent in that property. Mandates: A.R.S. § 11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; A.R.S. §§ 48-3605, 48-3606, and 48-3609 establish assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; A.R.S. § 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 9 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Performance Analysis: FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED Demand Number of square miles of watercourse requiring delineation. Output Number of square miles of watercourses that were delineated. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per square mile delineated Revenues by Fund Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Grants Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 1,025 1,025 1,400 1,393 368 35.9% 736 736 736 1,393 657 89.3% 71.8% 3,231.62 $ 71.8% 4,733.39 $ 52.6% 4,708.79 $ 100.0% 2,351.34 $ 28.2% 2,382.05 39.3% 50.3% $ $ - $ $ 20,000 20,000 $ $ 8,536 8,536 $ $ 4,000 4,000 $ $ (16,000) (16,000) -80.0% -80.0% $ 2,378,474 2,378,474 - $ 3,483,775 3,483,775 16.20 $ 3,465,671 3,465,671 - $ 3,275,412 3,275,412 17.90 $ 208,363 208,363 1.70 6.0% 6.0% 10.5% $ $ $ $ $ $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 # of Delineated Square Miles 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Demand Cost per square mile Output Cost/Delineated Square Mile Floodplain Delineation Activity Performance The FY 2007-08 budget for the Floodplain Delineation Activity meets the projected demand of 1,393 square miles of watercourse delineated at an annual cost of $2,351 per square mile in order to achieve delineation of 100%. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to decrease by $208,363 (6.0%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The decrease related to the rate variance is $3,318,200 (95.2%) and is offset by an unfavorable volume variance of $3,109,837 (89.3%). The favorable rate variance is due to a declining marginal cost for additional square miles delineated. Floodplain delineation is a priority for the Flood Control District, and engineering technicians have been added to enhance this function. The FY 2007-08 total activity budget does reflect a decrease, however, because of the need to allocate resources to Enforcement for remediation of a sand and gravel 10 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District operation. This is discussed in greater detail in the Floodplain Enforcement Activity section. The District prioritizes activities each year and allocates funding as needed. Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide studies which identify and document flood and erosion hazards, and alternative mitigation solutions to public and private organizations so that they can incorporate knowledge of flood hazards in their plans and their flood hazard remediation requests to the District. Mandates: A.R.S. § 11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; A.R.S. § 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of square miles of watershed identified for plan studies. Output Number of square miles of watershed that were studied. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per square mile Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Staffing (FTEs) $ $ Totals $ FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2006-07 PROJ ACT FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 547 768 768 4,729 4,426 1,698 768 768 503 768 100.0% 10,266 $ 100.0% 9,437 $ 310.4% 5,202 $ 8,833,019 8,833,019 - $ $ 7,884,650 7,884,650 - $ $ 7,247,936 7,247,936 26.20 $ $ 10.6% 15,305.45 $ 7,698,641 7,698,641 - $ $ Variance (Rev. - Adopted.) 3,658 - 17.4% 9,810.68 $ 7,534,602 7,534,602 27.40 % $ 476.3% 0.0% -82.6% (373.26) -82.6% -4.0% (286,666) (286,666) 1.20 -4.0% -4.0% 4.6% The FY 2007-08 budget for the Flood Hazard Planning Activity meets projected output of 768 square miles of watershed identified for plan studies at an annual cost of $9,811 per square mile studied in order to achieve 17.4% of square miles of watershed studied. The District projects to study 503 square miles of watershed in FY 2006-07. An additional FTE was allocated to this activity in FY 2007-08 in order to complete 768 studies. As the studies are completed, the demand is expected to decrease annually. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to increase by $377,699 (5.2%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The increase related to the rate variance is $1,321,441 (18.2%) and is offset by a favorable volume variance of $943,742 (13.0%). The increased rate cost is nominal at $492 or 5.2% and is attributed to higher personnel costs. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information to the public so that they can be more knowledgeable about the risks of floods and flood hazards, and the Flood Control District projects, studies, and activities that will affect them and weather, water level, and stream flow information to agencies that need to respond to flooding so that they can make their decisions in a timely and effective manner. 11 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Program Results Percent of dollar value of positive media attention received at a rating of five or above (on a scale of one to nine). FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT ADOPTED (Rev. - Adopted) 0.0% 93.7% 93.7% 93.7% 100.0% 6.3% Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Outreach • % 6.7% Mass Media Public Outreach Activity The purpose of the Public Outreach Activity is to provide information and learning opportunities to the public about flood and storm water related issues so that they are aware of the dangers and can be safe. Mandates: A.R.S. § 48-3609(E) requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; A.R.S. § 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44 C.F.R. § 59.78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of presentation and program requests received. Output Number of presentation and program requests completed. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per presentation/request Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Staffing (FTEs) $ $ Totals $ FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted.) % 350 58 58 250 350 292 503.4% 19 71 71 250 350 279 393.0% 5.3% 14,496 $ 122.4% 21,054 $ 122.4% 9,730 $ 100.0% 3,496 $ 100.0% 819.75 $ 268,175 268,175 - $ $ 1,494,867 1,494,867 - $ $ 690,844 690,844 3.50 $ $ 873,940 873,940 - $ $ 286,911 286,911 3.50 $ -22.4% 8,910 403,933 403,933 - -18.3% 91.6% 58.5% 58.5% 0.0% The FY 2007-08 Budget for the Public Outreach Activity meets the projected demand of 350 presentation/program requests at an annual cost of $820 per request completed in order to achieve the result of 100%. Demand and output data is not available for prior years; therefore, no comparisons are made. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures are budgeted at $286,911 at a cost of $820 per presentation/program request. 12 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Mass Media Activity The purpose of the Mass Media Activity is to provide information to reporters, and discuss with them information about flood hazards and projects so that they can be more knowledgeable about flood risks and flood control projects and provide accurate and balanced information to the public. Mandates: Administrative mandate Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of dollars of media attention required Output Number of dollars of positive media attention received Percent of Demand met $ Efficiency Cost per dollar of media attention Expenditures by Fund Flood Control $ Totals $ Staffing (FTEs) FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 1,269,993 932,140 932,140 1,500,000 2,000,000 1,067,860 114.6% 1,269,993 836,622 836,622 836,622 2,000,000 1,163,378 139.1% 100.0% 0.32 $ 409,247 409,247 - $ $ 89.8% 0.80 $ 666,516 666,516 - 89.8% 0.40 $ $ $ 331,189 331,189 2.50 $ $ 55.8% 0.41 $ 340,566 340,566 - $ $ 100.0% 0.26 $ 526,313 526,313 2.50 $ $ 10.2% 0.13 11.4% 33.5% (195,124) (195,124) - -58.9% -58.9% 0.0% Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to increase by $195,124 (58.9%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The budget contains $350,000 in funding for television airtime to advertise the risks of flood hazards. Flood Hazard Regulation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Regulation Program is to provide guidance, direction, and enforcement for the public so that they can avoid causing adverse impacts to floodplains, and use their property safely and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. Program Results Percent of floodplain plan reviews completed within One Stop Shop goals timeframe. FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT ADOPTED (Rev. - Adopted) 93.0% 90.0% 90.0% 98.0% 90.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Enforcement • Floodplain Permit Inspection • • % 0.0% Floodplain Map Information Floodplain Review Floodplain Enforcement Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Enforcement Activity is to provide enforcement of the floodplain regulations to residents and property owners so that they can be kept out of harm’s way of floods and use and develop their property with an acceptable risk of flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. § 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; A.R.S. §§ 48-3613, 48-3614, and 48-3615 require authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44 C.F.R. § 59.78 (Code of Federal Regulations) 13 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of floodplain violation complaints received. Output Number of floodplain complaint cases investigated. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per complaint investigated Revenues by Fund Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 58 85 85 85 85 - 0.0% 49 78 78 85 85 7 9.0% 91.8% 667.99 $ 91.8% 694.77 $ 84.5% 4,352.31 $ 100.0% 1,365.92 $ 100.0% 10,131.35 $ $ $ 800 800 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 4,000 4,000 $ $ $ $ 213,263 213,263 - $ $ 52,103 52,103 - $ $ 54,192 54,192 0.50 $ $ 116,103 116,103 - $ $ 861,165 861,165 1.50 $ $ 8.2% 9.0% (9,436.58) -1358.2% 4,000 4,000 (806,973) -1489.1% (806,973) -1489.1% 1.00 200.0% The FY 2007-08 budget for the Floodplain Enforcement Activity meets the projected demand of 85 violation complaints at an annual cost of $10,131 per complaint in order to achieve 100.0% of demand. The FY 2006-07 budget assumed a 46.5% increase in demand, with output at 91.8% of demand. The District is projecting to meet this demand of 85 complaints at 100.0%. Violation complaints are hard to predict; therefore, the demand and output will remain the same at 85 complaints in FY 2007-08. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to increase by $806,973 (1,489.1%) from the FY 200607 revised budget. The increase is attributed to an unfavorable rate variance of $802,100 (1,480.1%) and an unfavorable volume variance of $4,863 (9.0%). The Fiscal Year 2007-08 budget contains funding of more than $697,250 for enforcement resources, of which $400,000 is for clean-up of Raven Rock. Raven Rock was an illegal sand and gravel operation which was ordered to remediate (correct the damage to) the site they were mining. The operation filed bankruptcy, and the District was ordered to remediate the site for health and safety reasons. When the bankruptcy proceedings are finalized, the District will be reimbursed for these costs. Outsourced engineering services for technical reviews and technology consulting has also increased expenditures in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Additionally, a senior engineer was added to this activity, bringing the activity FTE total to 1.5 and adding $92,853 in pay and benefits. Floodplain Inspection Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Inspection Activity is providing floodplain inspections to residents and builders so that they can complete construction in compliance with approved floodplain regulations. Mandates: A.R.S. § 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; A.R.S. §§ 48-3613, 48-3614, and 48-3615 require authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44 C.F.R. § 59.78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. 14 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of floodplain inspection requests received. Output Number of floodplain inspections completed. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per floodplain inspection Revenues by Fund Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 1,220 797 797 2,353 2,362 1,565 196.4% 1,176 733 733 2,164 2,362 1,629 222.2% 92.0% 642.83 $ 92.0% 498.41 $ 8.0% 275.22 8.7% 55.2% 96.4% 233.94 $ 92.0% 171.07 $ 100.0% 223.20 $ $ $ 3,059 3,059 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 122 122 $ $ - $ $ $ $ 275,118 275,118 - $ $ 471,193 471,193 - $ $ 365,337 365,337 4.50 $ $ 370,192 370,192 - $ $ 527,189 527,189 6.50 $ $ (161,852) (161,852) 2.00 -44.3% -44.3% 44.4% 2,500 $250 2,000 $200 1,500 $150 1,000 $100 $50 500 Cost/Floodplain Inspection # of Floodplain Inspections Floodplain Inspection Activity Performance $0 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Demand Output Cost per inspection The FY 2007-08 budget for the Floodplain Inspection Activity meets projected demand of 2,362 inspection requests at an annual cost of $223 per inspection in order to achieve 100.0% completed. In the table above, the FY 2006-07 budget assumed a 34.7% decrease in demand, with 92% completed. The District projects to actually complete 2,164 inspections in FY 2006-07. The amount of inspection requests will increase by 222.2% in FY 2007-08, with 100% of inspections completed due the addition of two inspectors. The District should be able to achieve 2,362 completed inspections with the additional resources. The FY 2006-07 adopted and revised demand and output measures were incorrect. The District now states that the adopted and revised demand and output amounts should have been 1,224 and 1,176 respectively, which would have shown no growth from FY 2005-06. The increase in demand for FY 2007-08 is actually 9.3%, which is more in line with FY 2006-07 projections. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures are budgeted to increase by $161,852 (44.3%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The increase related to volume is $811,915 (222.2%) and is offset by favorable rate variance of $650,063 (177.9%). The favorable rate of $223 per inspection is attributed to declining marginal costs. 15 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Floodplain Map Information Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Map Information Activity is to provide realtors, appraisers, engineers, and the public with flood determination information from flood insurance rate maps so that they will know if they can build on their property, where they can build on their property, and whether they need flood insurance. Mandates: A.R.S. § 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; A.R.S. § 48-3613 requires authorization for development in watercourses; 44 C.F.R. § 59.78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of flood determinations requested Output Number of flood determination requests responded to. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per flood determination Revenues by Fund Flood Control Grants Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 6,193 7,875 7,875 4,000 4,500 (3,375) -42.9% 6,193 5,500 5,500 4,000 4,500 (1,000) -18.2% 30.2% (5.43) 43.2% -51.1% $ 100.0% 8.11 $ 69.8% 12.40 $ 69.8% 10.61 $ $ $ (1,785) $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ 50,223 50,223 - 68,200 68,200 - $ $ 58,356 58,356 1.00 $ $ 55,317 55,317 - $ $ 72,162 72,162 1.00 $ $ $ $ 100.0% 13.83 $ 100.0% 16.04 $ (13,806) (13,806) - -23.7% -23.7% 0.0% $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 # of Flood Determinations 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Cost/Flood Determination Floodplain Map Information Activity Performance FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Demand Output Cost per determination The FY 2007-08 budget for the Floodplain Map Information Activity meets projected demand of 4,500 flood determinations requested at an annual cost of $16 per request in order to achieve 100% of requests fulfilled. 16 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District The FY 2006-07 revised budget assumed a 27.2% increase in demand, with results of 69.8% or 5,500 requests. The output is projected to actually decrease during FY 2006-07 by 1,500 requests. The decrease in demand and output can be attributed to the volatile real estate market in Maricopa County and the declining trend of new builds. The trend is now reversing, and the District is forecasting 4,500 determination requests in FY 2007-08. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to increase by $13,806 (23.7%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The increase related to rate is $24,416 (41.8%) and is offset by a favorable volume variance of $10,610 (18.2%). The cost per response has increased by $5, which is nominal. Floodplain Review Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Review Activity is to provide plan review comments or approvals to the One-Stop-Shop Distribution Center so that they can notify permit applicants of required changes to their plans or to pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. § 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; A.R.S. §§ 48-3613, 48-3614, and 48-3615 require authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44 C.F.R. § 59.78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of engineered and nonengineered floodplain plan review requests received. Output Number of floodplain plan reviews completed. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per plan review Revenues by Fund Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 955 2,024 2,024 2,418 2,594 570 28.2% 2,242 1,964 1,964 2,418 2,594 630 32.1% 3.0% 38.39 3.1% 5.3% 234.8% 411.43 $ 97.0% 683.50 $ 97.0% 724.05 $ 100.0% 596.14 $ 100.0% 685.66 $ $ $ 157,235 157,235 $ $ 250,000 250,000 $ $ 250,000 250,000 $ $ 296,122 296,122 $ $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ $ 750,000 750,000 300.0% 300.0% $ $ 922,415 922,415 - $ $ 1,342,390 1,342,390 - $ $ 1,422,039 1,422,039 17.00 $ $ 1,441,468 1,441,468 - $ $ 1,778,609 1,778,609 20.40 $ $ (356,570) (356,570) 3.40 -25.1% -25.1% 20.0% 17 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Floodplain Review Activity Performance $800 $700 2,500 $600 2,000 $500 $400 1,500 $300 1,000 $200 500 Cost/Floodplain Review # of Floodplain Reviews 3,000 $100 $0 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Output Cost per floodplain review The FY 2007-08 budget for the Floodplain Review Activity meets projected demand of 2,594 plan review requests at an annual cost of $686 per review in order to achieve 100.0% completion. The FY 2006-07 budget assumed a 111.9% increase in demand due to a change in the methodology of calculating the reviews. The District is projecting to complete 2,418 reviews in FY 2006-07 at $596 per review. The demand in FY 2005-06, 955, was a count of review cases and not actual reviews, which can be more than one per case. The District realized that the measure was incorrectly calculated and then counted output as actual reviews completed, 2,242. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to increase by $356,570 (25.1%) from the FY 2006-07 revised budget. The increase related to volume is $456,153 (32.1%) and is offset by a favorable rate variance of $99,583 (7.0%). The cost per review will be increased by $38 (5.3%) and is attributed to the addition of 3.4 FTEs to this activity as well as an increase in capital costs for two replacement trucks at $60,000 and radios at $6,000. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide protection to the public from flood hazards through structural and non-structural solutions to mitigate flood hazards to provide protection to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Program Results FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT ADOPTED (Rev. - Adopted) Percent of Priority One Work Orders 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% that were completed within established time frames (Target = 90%) Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Control Capital Projects • 18 % 0.0% Flood Control System Maintenance Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural (buy-out) solutions to known flooding and drainage problems to residents and government agencies so that they can have reduced risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. §§ 45-1423 and 45-1424 give power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; A.R.S. § 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Performance Analysis: Demand Number of capital dollars to be expended Output Number of capital dollars expended Percent of Demand met Efficiency Expenditures per unit of Output Revenues by Fund Eliminations Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Eliminations Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ $ $ $ $ FY 2005-06 ACTUAL ADOPTED FY 2006-07 REVISED PROJ ACT - - - - 61,000,000 61,000,000 - - - - 61,000,000 61,000,000 - $ - $ - $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED - Variance (Rev. - Rec.) % $ 100.0% 1.02 $ (1.02) (61,762,926) $ 61,762,926 19,909,710 19,909,710 $ (77,315,461) $ 77,315,461 21,106,000 21,106,000 $ (57,849,304) $ 57,849,304 21,106,001 21,106,001 $ (57,849,304) $ 57,849,304 17,464,568 17,464,568 $ (58,628,253) $ 58,628,253 17,042,874 17,042,874 $ (778,949) 778,949 (4,063,127) (4,063,127) 1.3% 1.3% -19.3% -19.3% (61,762,926) $ 57,971,166 62,948,389 59,156,629 $ - (77,315,461) $ 71,000,000 78,892,743 72,577,282 $ - (57,849,304) $ 60,000,000 59,550,043 61,700,739 $ 35.60 (57,849,304) $ 60,000,000 59,458,283 61,608,978 $ - (58,628,253) $ 60,925,000 59,947,785 62,244,532 $ 30.10 778,949 (925,000) (397,742) (543,793) (5.50) -1.3% -1.5% -0.7% -0.9% -15.4% Demand and output performance measures were revised in the Flood Control Capital Projects activity for FY 2007-08; therefore, data for prior years is not provided. Prior year’s measures were based on the number of square miles benefited from capital projects. Base Adjustments: In the Flood Control Fund (991), Transfers Out to the Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) were reduced by $1,581,574 in order to get a $0 fund balance in the operating fund (991). Transfers In were then reduced by the same amount in the Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990). Transfers In and Out in the Eliminations Fund (900) were then increased by $1,581,574. Flood Control System Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control System Maintenance Activity is to provide upkeep of the flood control system and its associated properties to the public so that they can get safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing flood control facilities. Mandates: A.R.S. § 45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; A.R.S. § 48-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; A.R.S. § 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; A.R.S. § 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. 19 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Performance Analysis: FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand Number of priority 1 work orders that were issued. Output Number of priority 1 work orders that were completed. Percent of Demand met Efficiency Cost per work order Revenues by Fund Flood Control Totals Expenditures by Fund Flood Control Totals Staffing (FTEs) FY 2006-07 REVISED ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJ ACT Variance (Rev. - Adopted) % 149 270 270 164 180 (90) -33.3% 148 265 265 164 180 (85) -32.1% 1.9% (20,673.55) 1.9% -46.0% $ 99.3% 57,774.62 $ 98.1% 44,421.06 $ $ $ 5,036,893 5,036,893 $ $ 21,150,000 21,150,000 $ $ 8,550,644 8,550,644 - $ $ 11,771,581 11,771,581 - 98.1% 44,945.71 $ 100.0% 69,075.88 $ 100.0% 65,619.26 $ $ $ 1,721,001 1,721,001 $ $ 1,625,427 1,625,427 $ $ 1,820,426 1,820,426 $ $ 99,425 99,425 5.8% 5.8% $ $ 11,910,612 11,910,612 69.85 $ $ 11,328,444 11,328,444 - $ $ 11,811,466 11,811,466 67.95 $ $ 99,146 99,146 (1.90) 0.8% 0.8% -2.7% 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 Cost/Priority 1 Work Order # of Priority 1 Work Orders Flood Control System Maintenance Activity Performance $0 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Demand Output Cost per priority one work order The FY 2007-08 budget for the Flood Control System Maintenance Activity meets projected demand of 180 priority one work orders at an annual cost of $65,619 per order in order to achieve 100% of work orders completed. The FY 2006-07 budget assumed an 87% increase in demand, with results of 98.1%. The number of work orders is actually projected to increase by only 10.1%, with 100% of demand met. It should be noted that the District changed its methodology of determining what constitutes a “priority one” work order; therefore, the projected demand and output reflects a significant reduction from the revised FY 2006-07 measure. Total FY 2007-08 expenditures will be budgeted to decrease by $99,146 (0.8%). The decrease related to volume is $3,880,143 (32.1%) and is offset by an unfavorable rate variance of 3,780,997 (30.3%). he decreased budget is mainly attributed to reduced spending in replacement vehicles and equipment. Total FY 2007-08 revenue will be budgeted to increase by $99,425 (5.8%). Revenue from a deleted activity, Property Management, will be posted to the Flood Control System Maintenance Activity for right-of-way revenue, which is creating this variance. Base Adjustment: Licenses and Permits revenue was reduced by $617,000 from $1,500,000 to $883,000 to reflect no growth based on recent economic forecasts. 20 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rates. The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Fiscal Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Net Assessed Value (Thousands) $ 11,129,482 12,361,851 13,660,618 15,504,112 17,485,890 19,544,069 21,174,169 24,140,629 26,585,248 29,605,196 32,778,027 45,937,945 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.3425 0.3425 0.3270 0.2858 0.2534 0.2319 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2047 0.1533 Tax Levy $ 36,078,354 38,118,477 42,339,342 44,670,223 44,310,754 45,042,553 45,322,696 44,165,629 50,550,367 62,733,411 67,096,622 70,422,870 The schedule at the right lists the District secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last ten fiscal years, plus the assessed value and the preliminary tax rate for FY 2007-08. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate was reduced to $0.1533 per $100 net assessed value, a difference of ($0.0514) from FY 2006-07. As reflected in the graph below, the tax rate has steadily declined over the past decade, while the secondary net assessed value has more than tripled. $50,000 $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $0.4000 $0.3500 $0.3000 $0.2500 $0.2000 $0.1500 $0.1000 $0.0500 $0.0000 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 Fiscal Year 21 05 06 07 08 Tax Rate NAV (Millions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District FY 2007-08 estimated revenues of $69,683,115 are based on an historical collection rate of 98.9%, and are an increase of $2,586,493 (3.9%) from the FY 2006-07 Adopted budget. Property tax revenue growth will be tempered in Fiscal Year 2007-08 and future fiscal years by the Board of Director’s selfimposed limit on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVY Flood Control District Levy Description Salt River Proj. Net Effective Net Assessed Value Assessed Value FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: FY 2007-08 Adopted $ 45,937,944,910 FY 2006-07 Adopted 32,778,027,362 Variance $ 13,159,917,548 $ $ 97,574,499 90,480,096 7,094,403 Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP $ $ 46,035,519,409 32,868,507,458 13,167,011,951 Revenue from 1-cent Levy $ $ 4,603,552 3,286,851 1,316,701 Tax Rates $ $ 0.1533 $ 0.2047 (0.05) $ Property Tax Levy 70,422,870 67,096,622 3,326,248 SRP Payments in Lieu of Taxes(PILT) $ 149,582 $ 185,213 (35,631) $ $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 70,572,452 67,281,835 3,290,617 Levy Limit FY 2007-08 Flood Control District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 67,096,622 68,438,554 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 44,654,430,674 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 45,937,944,910 D. Recommended Calculation D3. Recommended Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Divided by 100) D5. Recommended Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.1533 70,422,870 3,326,248 5.0% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 44,021,013,041 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 633,417,633 $ 44,654,430,674 22 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2007-08 2006-07 $ Levy Amount 70,422,870 67,096,622 Total Estimated Revenue: Estimated Collections $ 68,326,743 1,356,372 $ 69,683,115 Licenses and Permits (Millions) The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses Licenses and Permit Revenue and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. $4.0 The revenue generated from $3.5 $3.0 licenses and permits is used to $2.5 offset the cost of issuing the $2.0 permits. The chart to the right $1.5 shows FY 2005-06 actual $1.0 revenue, FY 2006-07 projected $0.5 revenue, and FY 2007-08 $budgeted revenue for this 2006 2007* 2008** category. Fewer requests for licenses and permits have resulted in reduced revenue from Licenses and Permits. Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are amounts received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table below reflects historical payments in lieu of taxes data. Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2001-02 $ 152,544 2002-03 136,905 2003-04 152,557 2004-05 196,239 2005-06 191,727 2006-07* 185,213 2007-08** 149,582 * Projected Actual ** Budget 23 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenue FY 2006-07 Adopted Jurisdiction City of Phoenix $ 3,272,000 Town of Wickenburg 715,000 City of Peoria City of Mesa 1,370,000 NRCS 4,498,000 Multiple Jurisdictions 11,151,000 Undetermined 100,000 Total $ 21,106,000 FY 2006-07 Revised $ 3,272,000 715,000 1,370,000 4,498,000 11,151,000 100,000 $ 21,106,000 FY 2006-07 Projected Actual $ 2,533,000 1,206,000 195,000 272,000 3,600,000 9,194,000 $ 17,000,000 FY 2007-08 Adopted $ 1,212,000 50,000 383,000 1,825,000 5,254,000 8,318,874 $ 17,042,874 Miscellaneous Revenue Flood Control District Miscellaneous Revenue $15.0 $12.0 (millions) The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales, and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. $9.0 $6.0 $3.0 $Listed to the right are the miscellaneous 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 revenues, other than bond proceeds, recorded for fiscal years 2001-02 through 2005-06. Note that revenues in fiscal years 2001-02 and 2002-03 include sale of land, which is nonrecurring in nature. Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. 24 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s capital improvement program. Flood Control District Fund Transfers $70 $60 (millions) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $2003 2004 2005 2006 2007** Projected 2008* Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Fund designations are explained in greater detail later in this section. A list of fund balance designations is provided below, as well. Estimated beginning fund balances for FY 2007-08 are based on audited actual fund balances at the end of FY 2005-06, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Unreserved/ Undesignated Beginning Fund Balance Revenue & Transfers In Expenditures & Transfers Out Operating Expenditures Unreserved/ Undesignated Ending Fund Balance SPECIAL REVENUE 991 FLOOD CONTROL $ 2,988,740 $ 91,523,997 $ 94,512,737 $ 94,512,737 $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 17,143,121 $ 58,628,253 $ 61,000,000 $ 61,000,000 $ 14,771,374 ELIMINATIONS $ - $ (58,628,253) $ - ALL FUNDS $ 20,131,861 $ (58,628,253) $ 91,523,997 25 $ (58,628,253) $ 96,884,484 $ 96,884,484 $ 14,771,374 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Fund Designations The following schedule lists amounts designated within the estimated balance of the Flood Control District’s operating fund. Designations are the District’s self-imposed limitations on financial resources that would otherwise be available for use. The fund balance designation is for budget stabilization to ensure that sufficient cash is set aside to cover shortfalls during the fiscal year due to the property tax collection cycle. FY 2007-08 Fund Balance Designations Fund/Designation Flood Control District (Fund 991) Budget Stabilization: Cash Flow/Property Tax FY 2006-07 $ 4,626,756 FY 2007-08 3,200,000 $ (Inc.)/Dec. 1,426,756 (1) (1) Based on the estimated amount needed to eliminate the need for Tax Anticipation Notes or other forms of short-term borrowing to finance current operations. Designation amount decreasing because of increased fund balance. Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 71,000,000 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue Reduction for Intern Program $ Revenue Reduction for Pay for Performance Adjustments Revenue Reduction for General Maintenance Market Increases Revenue Reduction for Chemical Application Market Increases Subtotal $ FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET - $ (11,000,000) $ REVENUE 77,315,461 (100,000) (32,038) (9,824) (27,333) (19,466,157) $ 60,000,000 $ 57,849,304 $ 60,000,000 $ 57,849,304 1,000,000 $ 3,150,696 1,000,000 $ (2,371,747) 778,949 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue and Expenditures Budget Submittal Above Target $ Decreased Transfers In from Operating Fund to Accommodate Reserved Funds Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BASE: $ 61,000,000 $ 58,628,253 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ 61,000,000 $ 58,628,253 26 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Flood Control Operating Fund (991) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 111,970,871 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Expenditure Reduction (Cave Buttes Property Not Sold) $ Subtotal $ (19,939,794) (19,939,794) $ REVENUE 110,270,585 (19,429,000) (19,429,000) FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: Restatements Reclassification of County IGA Revenue & Expense FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: $ 92,031,077 713,339 $ 90,841,585 713,339 $ 92,744,416 $ 91,554,924 FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET $ 36,250,609 $ 94,881,172 - $ (1,583,877) (739,755) (50,418) (617,000) BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue Submittal Below Target $ Decreased Property Taxes Decreased Payments in Lieu of Taxes Decreased Licenses and Permits Revenue/expenditures decreased: payments from Transportation (640) will be realized as allocations in Increased Regular Pay and Benefits for IT Market Adjustments Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BASE: Transfer to CIP Budget/Decreased Transfers Out FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: 27 $ $ (366,125) (366,125) 29,891 (366,125) $ 35,884,484 58,628,253 94,512,737 $ $ (3,357,175) 91,523,997 91,523,997 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District employs a planning procedure that includes intergovernmental agency collaboration and prioritization based on an established list of ranking criteria for designated types of projects. The Flood Control District project ranking criteria follows: • • • • • • • • • • • Submitting agency priority Master plan element Hydrologic/hydraulic significance Level of protection Area protected Environmental quality Area-wide benefits Total projected cost Level of partner(s) participation Operational and maintenance costs Operational and maintenance responsibility The prioritization procedure used by the Flood Control District is a multi-step decision process intended to implement previously approved fiscal policies from the District’s Strategic Plan. Potential CIP projects are identified primarily through agency requests and/or the Area Drainage Master Studies/Area Drainage Master Plans (ADMS/ADMP), flood plain delineation studies, or other District programs. As ADMPs are completed and adopted, it is anticipated that a significant number of future CIP project requests will be generated through this program. Input received annually concerning project priorities coming from these, or other plans, as well as other submitted projects, will continue to be sought and prioritized on a County-wide basis using this procedure. The Flood Control District utilizes its CIP prioritization procedure to limit additional future structural maintenance responsibility to only those projects that are multi-jurisdictional and regional in nature and involve main watercourses. Capital Improvement Program Summary A total of 26 capital projects are identified and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The recommended projects are as follows: 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS PREVIOUS ACDC ADMP $ 28,359,405 ADOBE DAM ADMP 7,274,633 AGUILA ADMP BUCKEYE #1 12,406 BUCKEYE/SUN VALLEY ADMP DURANGO ADMP 8,906,237 EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY 51,416,909 EAST MESA ADMP 30,226,948 GILBERT/CHANDLER ADMP GLENDALE/PEORIA ADMP 50,469,919 HIGLEY ADMP 5,048,369 MARYVALE ADMP 58,725,375 MCMICKEN DAM 11,986,017 METRO ADMP 160,806 PARADISE VLY, SCOTTSDALE,PHX 8,383,234 PROJECT RESERVES (FLOOD) QUEEN CREEK ADMP 12,870,006 SALT/GILA RIVER 1,881,994 SALTRIVER UPSTREAM INDIAN BEND SCATTER WASH CHANNEL 1,505,507 SKUNK CREEK/NEW RIVER 68,388,964 SOUTH PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 34,588,469 SPOOK HILL ADMP 7,641,294 TOWN OF GUADALUPE 8,650,363 WHITE TANKS ADMP 61,007,674 WHITE TANKS DAM #4 2,246,579 WICKENBURG ADMS 4,799,507 NON-PROJECT 426 TOTAL FUND 990 $ 470,816,032 PROJECTED FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 $ 4,693,000 $ 984,000 153,000 15,000 217,000 6,000 518,000 5,000 3,826,002 3,977,000 3,074,000 2,144,000 1,553,000 10,000 157,000 2,820,003 14,489,000 11,257 15,071,000 962,000 30,508 497,000 443,000 3,487,000 147,000 982,000 375,250 1,504,000 321,000 10,048,000 36,800 105,000 6,000 1,044,000 20,000 722,304 1,450,000 773,000 1,094,000 1,000 20,376,999 10,019,000 10,000 2,375,366 7,943,000 249,999 75,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 61,000,000 FY 2008-09 1,124,000 516,000 10,210,000 8,810,000 5,208,000 826,000 537,000 288,000 1,220,000 1,755,000 1,305,000 550,000 1,450,000 6,361,000 390,000 20,955,000 774,000 2,721,000 $ 65,000,000 $ 28 FY 2009-10 $ $ 516,000 4,149,000 516,000 7,491,000 5,108,000 3,643,000 8,569,000 2,168,000 2,070,000 2,003,000 2,581,000 258,000 826,000 7,367,000 8,516,000 6,219,000 3,000,000 65,000,000 FY 2010-11 $ $ 3,094,000 8,150,000 3,610,000 2,073,000 6,207,000 2,578,000 6,183,000 4,249,000 620,000 2,585,000 2,068,000 6,704,000 3,134,000 5,931,000 10,314,000 2,500,000 70,000,000 FY 2011-12 $ $ 13,408,000 4,022,000 6,737,000 2,578,000 5,912,000 5,157,000 630,000 2,063,000 5,157,000 13,585,000 8,251,000 2,500,000 70,000,000 5-YEAR TOTAL (FY 2008-12) 2,108,000 17,018,000 217,000 17,355,000 4,126,000 30,488,000 11,315,000 19,162,000 157,000 34,449,000 2,168,000 14,019,000 6,191,000 3,775,000 982,000 5,977,000 16,969,000 1,563,000 4,131,000 1,044,000 550,000 10,430,000 23,113,000 390,000 59,006,000 25,558,000 7,943,000 10,796,000 $ 331,000,000 $ TOTAL PROJECT 35,160,405 24,445,633 232,000 17,373,406 4,131,000 43,220,239 65,805,909 51,532,948 167,000 87,738,921 7,227,626 87,815,376 18,207,525 4,378,806 9,512,235 $ 6,352,250 30,160,006 3,481,794 4,236,000 2,555,507 68,958,963 45,740,773 31,527,293 9,041,363 140,390,673 27,814,579 15,117,873 11,046,425 $ 861,816,032 Page 29 30 31 32 33 33 35 36 37 38 40 41 42 43 44 45 47 48 49 49 50 52 53 54 58 59 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District ACDC Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 580.05.31 - 10th Street Wash Improvements - Alice Ave to ACDC (Along 10th Street, North of Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC) to Alice Avenue) 580.07.31 – 9th Avenue Storm Drain – Peoria Ave to ACDC 3 City of Phoenix City of Phoenix (50%) 580.05.31 - FY 2007 580.07.31 – FY 2008 Project Description: 10th Street Wash Improvements, Alice to ACDC (580.05.31) The Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) conducted the ACDC Area Drainage Master Study in June of 1992. The study recommended this project to be completed along with upstream improvements such as 10th Street Wash Basin #1, Basin #2a and #2b. The portion of the 10th Street Wash to be improved is from Alice Avenue to ACDC. The project is located within the jurisdiction of City of Phoenix, Township 3N, Range 3E, Section 33 of GSRBM. The project is about 3000 feet in length starting at just south of Alice Avenue along 10th Street to ACDC. Most of the project will be within the existing drainage rights-of-way. The project will include multiple pipes or box culvert with small open channel on top of the box and/or pipes. Several inlet structures (catch basins etc…) will be located along the east side of the channel to capture sheet flows. Several utilities may need to be relocated to facilitate the new pipe/box culverts. The 10th Street Wash Improvements Project: • Eliminates the existing floodplain containing 84 homes and commercial properties, • Eliminates the existing hazard of a deep and unsafe open channel without any type of security fence and/or guard rail, • Provides positive outfall for the storm drain coming from east along El Caminito Blvd. • Connects the east and west neighborhood currently divided by the drainage channel, • Enhances the quality of life through diminishing the impacts of flooding; and • Increases opportunities for multi-use corridor facilities The design is complete and project is under construction. It is anticipated to be completed by July 2007. 9th Avenue Storm Drain, Peoria Ave to ACDC (580.07.31) The project was identified within the Sunnyslope Candidate Assessment Report (CAR) as a one of several storm drains required in the Sunnyslope area to prevent local flooding during smaller events. The City received numerous drainage complaints from this area. The City requested the District to initiate a drainage study to identify the problem and recommend solutions to the drainage issues. The 9th Avenue Storm Drain project starts at Peoria Avenue along 9th Avenue and ends at Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC). The project consists of a storm drain system of pipe sizes ranging from 24” to 78”, inlet and outlet structures as well as catch basins. The project will provide a 10-yr level of flood protection to the properties located in the watershed. The City is the lead agency for design 29 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District and construction of the project. The District is cost sharing only the construction of the project. The District has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the City to identify cost share and responsibilities of each project partner for construction, construction management and operation and maintenance of the project. The City has completed the design of the project and it is waiting for construction funding. The City will own, operate and maintain the storm drain system once completed. Funding/Cost Summary Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total Prior Yrs FY 06-07 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Actual Projected FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 $ 22,829,083 $ 3,311,000 $ (228,000) $ 1,124,000 $ 5,530,322 1,382,000 1,212,000 $ 28,359,405 $ 4,693,000 $ 984,000 $ 1,124,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total Total Project - $ 896,000 $ 27,036,083 1,212,000 8,124,322 - $ 2,108,000 $ 35,160,405 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Adobe Dam-Desert Hills Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 520.xx.xx. - TBD The project location is the reach of Skunk Creek from just 2000 feet north of CAP to the I-17 crossing. 520.xx.xx. - TBD The project location is the recommended alternative identified in the Adobe Dam-Desert Hills ADMP. 3 Flood Control District City of Phoenix, ADOT, CAP To be determined Project Description: Skunk Creek at CAP One of the elements of the recommended plan for the Adobe Dam-Desert Hills Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) is the extension of the Corps’ levees north from I-17, until they tie into the CAP. Additionally, a levee north of the CAP along I-17 and Sonoran Wash is recommended to stop overtopping of the I-17 and skunk creek to the east. Adobe Dam-Desert Hills ADMP The study area is bounded by the Tonto National Forest to the North, the Adobe Dam to the south, approximately 40th Street alignment (north of the Carefree Highway) and 7th Street alignment (south of the Carefree Highway) to the east, and the watershed boundary between skunk creek and new river to the west. The total project area is approximately one hundred square miles. Future projects from the ADMP will be implemented under this title. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 7,274,633 $ 7,274,633 $ FY 06-07 Projected 153,000 $ 153,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ 30 516,000 $ 516,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 2,844,000 $ 250,000 3,094,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 9,408,000 $ 4,000,000 13,408,000 $ Total Project 12,768,000 $ 4,250,000 17,018,000 $ 20,195,633 4,250,000 24,445,633 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary Current Year Current Project Operating Costs for User Department Personal Services $ 12,633 Supplies & Services 9,388 $ 22,021 Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Services $ 12,633 Supplies & Services 9,388 $ 22,021 Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Services $ Supplies & Services $ - Year 1 FY 07-08 $ $ $ $ $ $ 25,266 18,776 44,042 26,516 21,776 48,292 1,250 3,000 4,250 Year 2 FY 08- 09 $ $ $ $ $ $ 26,150 19,433 45,583 27,444 22,538 49,982 1,294 3,105 4,399 Year 3 FY 09-10 $ $ $ $ $ $ Year 4 FY 10-11 Year 5 FY 11-12 27,066 20,113 47,179 $ 28,013 20,817 $ 48,830 $ 28,993 21,546 $ 50,539 28,405 23,327 51,732 $ 29,399 24,143 $ 53,542 $ 30,428 24,988 $ 55,416 1,339 3,214 4,553 $ 1,386 3,326 $ 4,712 $ $ 1,434 3,443 4,877 Aguila Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: Aguila Area 4 Flood Control District None FY 2008 Project Description: The Floodprone Property Acquisition Program is (FPAP) is one of the District's flood hazard remediation programs that is contained within the Aguila Area Drainage Master Plan project. The FPAP is a voluntary buy-out program to remove residents living in a flood hazard area where a structural alternative is not feasible or cost effective. This program was approved in November 2004 via resolution 2004R013 and will be implemented over several years. The current property Owner applied for the program in August 2005. The potential flooding hazard for his property was evaluated for the 100-yr flood and compared to other properties. The District anticipates purchasing this property in FY 07-08. Funding/Cost Summary Funding Source Prior Yrs Actual $ Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ FY 06-07 Projected - $ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 217,000 $ 217,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 31 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 217,000 $ 217,000 $ 232,000 232,000 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Buckeye FRS No. #1 Rehabilitation Project Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 207.01.31 – Buckeye #1 Dam Rehabilitation - along the western slopes of the White Tank Mountains, parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River 4 Flood Control District Natural Resources Conservation District (Potential Future Federal Partner) FY 2012 Project Description: Buckeye FRS #1 is the western most dam of the series of three flood control dams that were all designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service – NRCS) from 1973 to 1975. The dam is located along the western slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) and is regulated under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). The District has formal operating agreements with NRCS for all structural features of the Buckeye Watershed Project inclusive of Buckeye FRS #1. Since the dam’s original construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS #1 as a dam safety deficiency that must be corrected. ADWR currently classifies the dam as “unsafe non-emergency” due to embankment cracking. The District has completed Phase I Assessments of the dam and has filed application for federal cost share assistance and technical assistance under Public Law 106-472, The Small Watershed Amendment, with NRCS for a rehabilitation project to address the dam safety issues and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways, or basins, which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. Buckeye FRS #1 has been identified as a major component of the proposed Maricopa Regional Trail Phase 3 Master Plan. Project planning will include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational federal cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Initially, the reconstructed dam will not require the current level of maintenance; however, the long-term maintenance requirements will be similar to today’s efforts. As is currently the case, the District would operate and maintain the rehabilitated dam (or the facility that replaces the dam). Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ $ 12,406 $ 12,406 $ FY 06-07 Projected 6,000 $ 6,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 518,000 $ 518,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 516,000 $ 516,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 32 Year 3 FY 09-10 4,149,000 $ 4,149,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 8,150,000 $ 8,150,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 4,022,000 $ 4,022,000 $ Total Project 17,355,000 $ 17,355,000 $ 17,373,406 17,373,406 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Buckeye/Sun Valley ADMP Project Location: 211.03.31 Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Strom Drain: Located along Monroe Street to Apache Road and then outfalls to the Gila River. (The Historic Downtown Buckeye) 4&5 Flood Control District Town of Buckeye FY 2011 Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: Project Description: The project is to mitigate repetitive flooding in the Downtown Buckeye area by constructing a 10-year storm drain and 100-year basin system that will convey flows from Monroe Street (MC-85) to a regional Basin located south of Monroe and east of Apache Road. The flows then will be conveyed southerly in another 10 year system to outfall in the Gila River. Funding/Cost Summary Funding Source Prior Yrs Actual $ Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ FY 06-07 Projected - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ 516,000 $ 516,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 3,610,000 $ 3,610,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 4,126,000 $ 4,126,000 $ 4,131,000 4,131,000 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Durango Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 565.xx.xx - I-10 south to the Salt/Gila Rivers, and from approximately 27th Avenue west to the Agua Fria River 565.04.31 – 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel 565.04.32 –Durango Regional Conveyance Channel Avondale 5 565.xx.xx – to be determined 565.04.31 – City of Phoenix and FCDMC (O&M by City of Phoenix) 565.04.32 – City of Avondale and FCDMC City of Phoenix & Avondale 565.xx.xx – FY 2011 565.04.31 – FY 2010 565.04.32 – FY 2015 33 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Project Description: Durango ADMP (565.xx.xx) The study consisted of an area drainage master plan that recommended guidelines for storm water management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the Durango Study area. The study included analysis of approximately 68 square miles of watershed, which extends from I-10 south to the Salt/Gila Rivers, and from approximately 27th Avenue west to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost effective solutions for a storm water collection and conveyance system, and identified potential outfall alternatives. Currently the Study is in the implementation phase, which identifies the next design and construction phases for of solutions to the identified flooding hazards. Total expenditures proposed for the CIP are now estimated at $130 million for identified projects, which includes the costs for the 75th Avenue Storm Drain & Durango Regional Conveyance Channel. 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (565.04.31) The 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel Project will provide an interim regional outfall for the City of Phoenix, and is the first phase of the Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) Project. The area north of the UPRR railroad has associated flooding hazards. The improvements will reduce the flooding hazards and remove approximately 71 structures from an identified floodplain. The project was requested by the City of Phoenix for inclusion into the District's CIP in the FY 2001/2002 Prioritization Procedure. The FCDMC and City of Phoenix are cost sharing at 65% FCDMC and 35% City of Phoenix, for total Project costs. Construction of the storm drain is ongoing. The 75th Avenue storm drain is under construction by the City of Phoenix. Construction of the DRCC by FCDMC will begin in summer 2009. The City of Phoenix will operate and maintain the completed project and the DRCC basin will become a City park. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel – Avondale (565.04.32) The Durango Regional Conveyance Channel Project will provide an interim regional outfall for the City of Avondale, and is the outfall for the Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) Project. The project was requested by the City of Avondale for inclusion into the District's CIP in the FY 2004/2005 Prioritization Procedure. The FCDMC and City of Avondale are cost sharing approximately 35% FCDMC and 65% City of Phoenix, for the total Project costs. The City of Avondale will operate and maintain the completed project. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 6,514,386 $ 2,391,851 8,906,237 $ FY 06-07 Projected 3,567,002 $ 259,000 3,826,002 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 3,977,000 $ 3,977,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 9,087,000 $ 1,123,000 10,210,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 34 Year 3 FY 09-10 6,368,000 $ 1,123,000 7,491,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 2,073,000 $ 2,073,000 $ Year 5 Fy 11-12 5-Year Total 6,737,000 $ 6,737,000 $ Total Project 28,242,000 $ 2,246,000 30,488,000 $ 38,323,388 4,896,851 43,220,239 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District East Maricopa Floodway Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 121.03.32 – Rittenhouse Basin; located near Williams Field Road and Power Road 121.03.33 – Chandler Heights Basin; located near Queen Creek Road and Chandler Heights Road 1 Flood Control District None 121.03.32 – FY2011 121.03.33 - FY 2014 Project Description: Rittenhouse Basin (121.03.32) The District completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study that identified several drainage and flooding problems along the EMF. The study proposed to mitigate the problem by constructing two large off line detention basins. The Rittenhouse Basin is one of those two off line basins, and it will mitigate flows from the EMF. This project is being accomplished solely by the District and consists of a pre-design, a final design and construction. The design has been completed, as has construction of the first phase. Phase 2, the final phase of construction, is presently scheduled for FY2010. The District has negotiated an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Gilbert for the Town’s recreational use of the basin in the future. The Town will fund the recreation amenities and assume responsibility for most operation and maintenance obligations. Chandler Heights Basin (121.03.33) The District completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study that identified several drainage and flooding problems along the EMF. The study proposed to mitigate the problem by constructing two large off-line detention basins. The Chandler Heights Basin is one of those two off-line basins, and it will mitigate flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui Washes into the EMF. This project is being accomplished solely by the District and consists of a pre-design, a final design and construction. The design has been completed, as has construction of the first and second phases. Because of the size of the basin and because of the cost, construction will be phased over a number of years. The District will be negotiating an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Gilbert for the Town’s recreational use of the basin in the future. The Town would fund the recreation amenities and assume responsibility for most operation and maintenance obligations. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 51,416,909 $ 51,416,909 $ FY 06-07 Projected 2,874,000 $ 200,000 3,074,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 35 5,108,000 $ 5,108,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 6,207,000 $ 6,207,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 11,315,000 $ 11,315,000 $ 65,605,909 200,000 65,805,909 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District East Mesa Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 442.08.31 – Ellsworth Channel - begin at Pecos and Ellsworth Roads and convey to the Powerline Floodway 442.11.31 – Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements Vicinity of Meridian Road and north of Elliot Road 1 442.08.31 – Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) (O&M by City of Mesa) 442.11.31 – FCDMC (O&M by City of Mesa and FCD) City of Mesa, MCDOT 442.11.31 – FY 2009 Project Description: Ellsworth Channel (442.08.31) Design and construction of the Ellsworth Channel was included in MCDOT’s Ellsworth Road - Germann to Baseline project (Project). Ellsworth Channel was identified as a high priority component of the regional flood plan in the East Mesa Area Drainage Master Plan. MCDOT developed a Design Concept Report (DCR) for the Project, which provided a preliminary design for the flood control features. Ellsworth Channel will begin at Pecos and Ellsworth roads and convey the future 100-year storm flows and Ellsworth Road drainage to the Powerline Floodway, and alleviate significant flooding problems for the upgraded Ellsworth Road. MCDOT is the lead agency for the Project. IGA 2000A002 authorizes design and construction of the Ellsworth Channel, and identifies a cost share of 50 percent FCD, 40 percent City of Mesa, and 10 percent MCDOT, for the channel part of the project. The Project is nearing completion, and the City of Mesa will assume ownership, operation and maintenance of the completed project. Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements (442.11.31) This project is the final element of the recommended plan for the East Mesa ADMP for the area south of the Superstition Freeway and north of Warner Road. This project, as currently envisioned, will collect sheet flow from east of Meridian Road, attenuate the flows and convey the flow to the storm drain which was constructed for the Elliot Basin and Channel project near the 104th Street alignment. The Project will include one or more detention basin(s) on the east side of Meridian Road just north of Elliot Road in Pinal County. The channel along Meridian Road will collect and convey flows to the basin(s). Some flows from Siphon Draw Wash will also be diverted to the basin(s). The basin(s) will outlet to a new storm drain along Elliot Road, which will convey flow to the existing storm drain system. The draft design IGA between FCDMC and the City of Mesa identifies a 50/50 cost share for the Project design. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 23,246,579 $ 6,980,369 30,226,948 $ FY 06-07 Projected 2,144,000 $ 2,144,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 678,000 $ 875,000 1,553,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 4,560,000 $ 4,250,000 8,810,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 36 Year 3 FY 09-10 393,000 $ 3,250,000 3,643,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 1,328,000 $ 1,250,000 2,578,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 1,328,000 $ 1,250,000 2,578,000 $ Total Project 8,287,000 $ 10,875,000 19,162,000 $ 33,677,579 17,855,369 51,532,948 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Gilbert/Chandler Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: Gilbert/Chandler area 1 Flood Control District None FY 2008 Project Description: The Flood-prone Property Acquisition Program is (FPAP) is one of the District's flood hazard remediation programs that is contained within the Gilbert/Chandler Area Drainage Master Plan project. The FPAP is a voluntary buy-out program to remove residents living in a flood hazard area where a structural alternative is not feasible or cost effective. This program was approved in November 2004 via resolution 2004R013 and will be implemented over several years. The current property Owner applied for the program in August 2005. The potential flooding hazard for his property was evaluated for the 100-yr flood and compared to other properties. The District anticipates purchasing this property in FY 07/08. Funding/Cost Summary Funding Source Prior Yrs Actual $ Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ FY 06-07 Projected - $ - $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 157,000 $ 157,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 37 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 157,000 $ 157,000 $ 167,000 167,000 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 450.02.32 – Rose Garden Lane Channel; located along Rose Garden Lane from Lake Pleasant Road to the Agua Fria River 450.02.33 - 83rd Avenue and Pinnacle Peak Road Improvements; located between 83rd and 91st Avenues, and from Calle Lejos to south of Williams Road 450.05.30 – 67th Avenue Storm Drain 450.06.31 – Pinnacle Peak Road Channel; located along Pinnacle Peak Road from 89th Avenue to the Agua Fria River 450.08.31 – Pinnacle Peak Road/67th Ave Drainage Improvements 450.xx.xx - Beardsley Road Channel 4 450.02.32 – City of Peoria (O&M by the City) 450.02.33 – FCDMC (O&M by the City & MCDOT) 450.05.30 – City of Glendale (O&M by the City) 450.06.31 - TBD 450.08.31 – City of Peoria (O&M by the City) 450.xx.xx – TBD City of Glendale, City of Peoria, MCDOT 450.02.32 – FY 2008 450.02.33 – FY 2008 450.05.30 – FY 2009 450.06.31 - TBD 450.08.31 – FY 2011 450.xx.xx – TBD Project Description: Rose Garden Lane Channel (450.02.32) The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update Study (G/P ADMP) in May 2001. The Study made several recommendations for regional drainage infrastructure to provide 100-year protection for the G/P ADMP watershed. The Rose Garden Lane Channel is a high priority recommendation of the G/P ADMP and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The project consists of an open channel and culvert along the north side of Rose Garden Lane and an outlet basin at the Agua Fria River. The project will provide 100-year level of protection. The channel will benefit an area between approximately Lake Pleasant Road and the Agua Fria River, south of Rose Garden Lane. The City of Peoria is the project lead agency for all tasks with the District as a 50% cost-share partner. The design is nearing completion and construction is scheduled for FY08. The City of Peoria will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 38 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District 83rd Avenue/Pinnacle Peak Road Improvements (450.02.33) The 83rd Avenue/Pinnacle Peak Road Drainage Improvements Project is a high priority recommendation of the Glendale/Peoria (G/P) ADMP and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The District is the lead agency for all tasks. The design has been completed and construction is scheduled for FY08. The project will provide a combination of 10-year and 100-year levels of protection. The project will benefit an area between approximately 83rd and 91st Avenues, south of Calle Lejos (one-half mile north of Pinnacle Peak Road), and ties in to existing infrastructure on the east side of 83rd Avenue, south of Williams Road. The project components include two detention basins and a series of 10-yr and 100-yr storm drains. The City of Peoria and MCDOT will share responsibilities for operation and maintenance of the completed project. 67th Avenue Storm Drain (450.05.30) The project will provide 10-year storm drainage protection for a three square mile area lying within jurisdictional boundaries of both the cities of Glendale and Peoria. The project will consist of drainage pipes and catch basins and will be constructed in rights-of-way provided by Glendale. The outfalls for the project were constructed by the District along Cactus Road and Olive Avenue and are presently owned and operated by the City of Peoria. The District is contributing 50% of the project costs. The estimated cost for the project is $3 million, which includes the design, land acquisition, utility relocations, construction and construction management. Glendale is the lead agency for the design and construction of the project, and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The Phases of the project include the completed Phase 1, 200’ of storm drain at intersection with Peoria Avenue, and Phase 2, storm drain Installation to Cactus. Pinnacle Peak Road Channel (89th Ave. to AFR) (450.06.31) The Pinnacle Peak Road Channel Improvements Project is one of the recommended projects from the Glendale/Peoria (G/P) ADMP. The project is presently in the development stages with on-going discussions occurring among the District, the City of Peoria and the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) to define the project and project responsibilities. The proposed project will consist of a channel and culvert storm drain system along the north side of Pinnacle Peak Road from about 89th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. It will be necessary to obtain approval of a project resolution as well as an intergovernmental agreement. It is anticipated that the District will contribute 50% of the project costs and be the lead agency for the project. The City and MCDOT will share O&M responsibilities. Beardsley Road Channel (450.xx.xx) The Beardsley Road Channel Improvements Project is one of the recommended projects from the Glendale/Peoria (G/P) ADMP. The project is proposed by the City of Peoria and will require the development of a project Resolution and an IGA between the District and the City of Peoria. The proposed project will consist of a channel and culvert system along Beardsley Road from about 107th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. It is anticipated that the District and the City will each contribute 50% of the project costs. The City will be responsible for the O&M responsibilities. Pinnacle Peak/67th Avenue Drainage Improvements (450.08.31) The project is located in Township 4N, Range 1E Section 13 and Township 4N, Range 2E, Section 18, within City of Peoria. The project consists of design, construction and construction management of the storm drainage facilities to capture the runoff along Pinnacle Peak Road and 67th Avenue area. The City of Peoria is a lead agency for all of the tasks. The District will be involved during the entire phase of the project in review and decision making process. The District will take a lead in drafting 39 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District intergovernmental agreement between the two agencies to define each project partner’s responsibilities. The City will own, operate and maintain the project once completed. The project was recommended in the Glendale Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan as a regional drainage project. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 45,795,915 $ 4,674,004 50,469,919 $ FY 06-07 Projected 444,003 $ 2,376,000 2,820,003 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 13,037,000 $ 1,452,000 14,489,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 3,208,000 $ 2,000,000 5,208,000 $ 6,069,000 $ 2,500,000 8,569,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 Year 5 FY 11-12 3,683,000 $ 2,500,000 6,183,000 $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 25,997,000 $ 8,452,000 34,449,000 $ 72,236,917 15,502,004 87,738,921 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Higley Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O & M: Completion Date: 491.04.31 - Queen Creek Road Basin 1 City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler 491.04.31 - FY 2010 Project Description: The Queen Creek Road Basin was identified as one element of the recommended plan of the Higley ADMP. The project includes design and construction of a retention basin along south east corner of Queen Creek Road and McQueen Road. The basin would serve as an off-line basin in order to alleviate the flooding problems along the eastern boundary of the Consolidated Canal as well as flooding to the west caused by possible overtopping of the canal from runoff generated within the study area. The basin will retain approximately 204 ac-feet of storage volume for up to a 100-yr frequency storm event. The City of Chandler’s Parks Department is interested in developing this basin as a regional park and also will own, operate and maintain the basin once constructed. The City is the lead for design and construction. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 4,890,240 $ 158,129 5,048,369 $ FY 06-07 Projected 11,257 $ 11,257 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 40 2,168,000 $ 2,168,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 2,168,000 $ 2,168,000 $ 7,069,497 158,129 7,227,626 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Maryvale ADMP Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 620.03.32 - along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River, with storm drains in Camelback Road and Bethany Home Road 620.05.31 – 26th Ave. & Verde Lane Basin; located along Verde Lane between 25th and 26th Drives 4, 5 620.03.32 – FCDMC (O&M by Glendale and Phoenix) 620.05.31 – City of Phoenix (O&M by the City) Glendale, Phoenix 620.03.32 – FY 2012 620.05.31 – FY 2007 Project Description: Bethany Home Outfall (620.03.32) The Bethany Home Road Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The project will have a 100-year capacity removing approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the project has been completed by ADOT, with District participation. Phase I extends west from the Agua Fria Freeway to the New River following the Bethany Home Road Alignment. ADOT increased the size of their freeway drainage channel to accommodate additional flows from the Maryvale area. Phase II of the project includes a channel from the Agua Fria Freeway alignment to 63rd Avenue. The ADMP also recommends ten-year capacity storm drains, located within Bethany Home Road and Camelback Road, extending from 59th Avenue to the Outfall Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the cost to construct this 100-year channel and 10-year storm drains is approximately $67 million. The cost share for the project is approximately 50% District, and 25% each for the Cities of Glendale and Phoenix. The first reach of the Phase II project (Loop 101 to 83rd Avenue) is completed. Construction of the second and third reaches will be complete in mid-2007. Design and construction of the remainder or the improvements will be phased over several years, with completion anticipated in 2012. Each of the cities will own, operate and maintain the completed project within their jurisdictions. 26th Avenue/Verde Lane Basin (620.05.31) The project consists of a 100-year, 24-hour storm retention basin and storm drain system. The recommended alternative will incorporate a storm drain system designed to intercept flow from along the I-17 frontage road. Flows will be intercepted along 25th and 26th Drives, eliminating flooding for storms up to and including the10-year event. The Verde Lane Detention Basin will provide a positive outfall location for the proposed storm drains thereby precluding ponding from occurring within streets and houses in this area. The basin will drain into the existing 27thAvenue storm drain system after the peak flows have passed. This project cost will be shared equally with the City. Design and construction by the City has been completed. The City of Phoenix will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 41 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 35,514,381 $ 23,210,994 58,725,375 $ FY 06-07 Projected 10,685,000 $ 4,386,000 15,071,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 (838,000) $ 1,800,000 962,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 (199,000) $ 1,025,000 826,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 1,024,000 $ 1,046,000 2,070,000 $ Year 5 FY 10-11 1,791,000 $ 2,458,000 4,249,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 3,621,000 $ 2,291,000 5,912,000 $ Total Project 5,399,000 $ 8,620,000 14,019,000 $ 51,598,382 36,216,994 87,815,376 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable McMicken Dam Project Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 202.xx.xx – McMicken Dam Project; located east of the Beardsley Canal from the Peoria Avenue alignment 10 miles north to Grand Avenue, then northeast 6 miles to the McMicken Outlet Wash and then south 4 miles to the Agua Fria River 4 FCDMC None Final Design - FY 2009 Phase I Construction - FY 2011 Phase II Construction - FY 2013 Phase III Construction - FY 2015 Phase IV Construction - FY 2017 Project Description: Originally termed the Trilby Wash Detention Basin Dam, McMicken Dam was constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agriculture activities in the area from flooding. The dam is operated and maintained by the District. The dam also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure such as; hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and canals such as Beardsley canal. The ability of McMicken Dam to maintain the current level of flood protection in the long-term for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have lead the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. The District has initiated an alternatives analysis study under the Wittmann ADMP. The final design is planned to be completed during FY 2007/2008 through FY 2008/2009. It is anticipated that construction will be completed in phases with the first phase of construction initiated in FY 2011/2012. Project partners have not been identified. It will be necessary to obtain approval of a project resolution as well as intergovernmental agreements for any project partners identified. 42 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ $ 11,986,017 $ 11,986,017 $ FY 06-07 Projected 30,508 $ 30,508 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 497,000 $ 497,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 Year 3 FY 09-10 537,000 $ 537,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total 5,157,000 $ 5,157,000 $ Total Project 6,191,000 $ 6,191,000 $ 18,207,525 18,207,525 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Metro ADMP Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department : Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 625.02.31 - 24th Avenue & Camelback Basin; located between Missouri Avenue and Camelback Road, and between 23rd Avenue and I-17 3 City of Phoenix City of Phoenix 625.02.31 – FY 2008 Project Description: The project has been redefined to include the basin in the vicinity of 24th Avenue and Camelback Road and an associated storm drain system. Future phases will be addressed later. The existing Resolution and IGA will be superseded with new documents. The District will participate in 50% of the costs for the rights-of-way and for the design. The City will fund 100% of the construction cost, and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ $ 160,806 $ 160,806 $ FY 06-07 Projected 443,000 $ 443,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 3,487,000 $ 3,487,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 288,000 $ 288,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 43 Year 3 FY 09-10 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 3,775,000 $ 3,775,000 $ 4,378,806 4,378,806 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Paradise Valley, Scottsdale Phoenix - Scottsdale Road Corridor Drainage Improvements Project Location: 120.03.31 – Scottsdale Road Corridor Drainage along the east side of Scottsdale Road from Thunderbird Road to Sweetwater Avenue Supervisor District(s): 2 Managing Department: City of Scottsdale Project Partner(s): City of Scottsdale (50%) Completion Date: FY 2009 Project Description: This project includes improving an existing earthen drainage channel just east of Scottsdale Road from Thunderbird Road to Sweetwater Avenue with a closed system either as pipe and/or a box culvert. The City will be the lead agency for the project. The District and the City entered into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) to design and construct the project. The improvements will be designed to convey up to 10-yr flows. The design plans are at 100% design level and will be finalized by April 2007. The City intends to start construction of this project by July 2007. The City will own, operate and maintain the system once constructed. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 7,210,333 $ 1,172,901 8,383,234 $ FY 06-07 Projected 147,000 $ 147,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 982,000 $ 982,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 982,000 $ 982,000 $ 8,339,334 1,172,901 9,512,235 Operating Cost Summary Current Year Current Project Operating Costs for User Department Personal Services $ 6,619 Supplies & Services $ 6,619 Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Services $ 6,619 Supplies & Services $ 6,619 Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Services $ Supplies & Services $ - Year 1 FY 07-08 $ $ $ $ $ $ 44 Year 2 FY 08- 09 13,238 13,238 $ 14,238 2,400 16,638 $ 1,000 2,400 3,400 $ $ $ $ Year 3 FY 09-10 13,701 13,701 $ 14,736 2,484 17,220 $ 1,035 2,484 3,519 $ $ $ $ Year 4 FY 10-11 Year 5 FY 11-12 14,181 14,181 $ 14,677 $ 14,677 $ 15,191 $ 15,191 15,252 2,571 17,823 $ 15,786 2,661 $ 18,447 $ 16,338 2,754 $ 19,092 1,071 2,571 3,642 $ 1,109 2,661 $ 3,770 $ $ 1,148 2,754 3,902 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Queen Creek ADMP Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O & M: Completion Date: 480.04.31 – Sonoqui Wash, west of Higley Road to Chandler Heights Road 480.04.32 – Sonoqui Wash, Chandler Heights to Riggs Road 480.04.33 – Sonoqui Wash, Riggs Rd to Crismon Road 480.04.34 – Sonoqui Wash, Crismon Road to Empire Blvd 480.05.31 - Queen Creek Wash Channel (ReckerHigley); located along the wash south of Queen Creek Road from Recker to Higley Roads 1 480.04.31 – Towns of Gilbert and Queen Creek 480.04.32 - Town of Queen Creek 480.04.33 - Town of Queen Creek 480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek 480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert 480.04.31 – Towns of Gilbert and Queen Creek (25% each) 480.04.32 - Town of Queen Creek (anticipated 50%) 480.04.33 - Town of Queen Creek (anticipated 50%) 480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek (anticipated 50%) 480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert (50%) 480.04.31 – Towns of Gilbert and Queen Creek 480.04.32 - Town of Queen Creek 480.04.33 - Town of Queen Creek 480.04.34 - Town of Queen Creek 480.05.31 - Town of Gilbert 480.04.31 – FY 2008 480.04.32 - FY 2011 480.04.33 - FY 2012 480.04.34 - FY 2013 480.05.31 – FY 2007 Project Description: Sonoqui Wash Channelization (480.04.31) The project design includes channelization of existing wash from confluence of Queen Creek Wash, just west of Higley Road to Chandler Heights Road. The existing wash does not contain 100-yr flows and is subject to overtopping and flooding adjacent property owners. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-yr flow. The current floodplain encompasses approximately 800 acres of land. After completion of the project, a 200’ wide strip of land will be conveying all of the floodwaters and remaining land can be removed from the floodplain. This is a joint project between the 45 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District District, and both the Towns of Gilbert and Queen Creek. The District will be the lead agency for the design of the project including bank improvements, major roadway crossings, channel stabilization, and landscape and trail improvements. The District will be constructing the drainage related improvements and both of the Towns will be required to implement the proposed Landscaping of the channel at their own expense. Both of the Towns are expected to take responsibility of owning, operating and maintaining their portion of the channel. The adjacent developers, as per their development agreement with the Towns, will dedicate most of the land required for construction of the channel. The design has been completed and awaiting construction funding starting fiscal year 2007/08. The engineer’s estimated cost of construction is approximately $9.0 million. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road) (480.04.32) The Sonoqui Wash Floodplain Delineation Study from Higley Road to Riggs Road indicated that significant ponding and breakouts of flood flows occur along the wash. Results from the Queen Creek & Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan for Queen Creek and Sonoqui Washes indicate that the most feasible solution to contain breakouts from Sonoqui Wash is to increase the cross section of the wash to contain the 100-year flood flows. In conjunction with Town of Queen Creek, the District is undertaking this project. The project design includes channelization of existing wash from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-yr flow. The total length of the project is approximately 2 miles. The District will be the lead agency for the design and other related tasks including bank improvements, major roadway crossings, channel stability analysis and landscape and trail improvements. The existing floodplain within this reach contains 115 acres of developable land and once the project is constructed the floodplain can be removed from these properties. The Town of Queen Creek has requested the project and will be required to assume the maintenance responsibilities of the project after completion. The Town owns majority of the property required to construct the channel. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Riggs Road to Crismon Road) (480.04.33) The results from the Queen Creek & Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan for Queen Creek and Sonoqui Washes indicate that the most feasible solution to contain breakouts from Sonoqui Wash is to increase the cross section of the wash to contain the 100-year flood flows. In conjunction with Town of Queen Creek, the District is undertaking this project. The project design includes channelization of existing wash from Riggs Road to Crismon Road, which is called east branch of Sonoqui Wash. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-yr flow. The total length of the project is less than 2 miles. The Town will be the lead agency for the design and other related tasks including bank improvements, major roadway crossings, channel stability analysis and landscape and trail improvements. The Town of Queen Creek has requested the project and will be required to assume the maintenance responsibilities of the project after completion. The Town owns majority of the property required to construct the channel. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Crismon Road to Empire Blvd) (480.04.34) The results from the Queen Creek & Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan for Queen Creek and Sonoqui Washes indicate that the most feasible solution to contain breakouts from Sonoqui Wash is to increase the cross section of the wash to contain the 100-year flood flows. In conjunction with Town of Queen Creek, the District is undertaking this project. The project design includes channelization of existing wash from Crismon Road to Empire Blvd. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-yr flow. The total length of the project is less than 2 miles. The Town will be the 46 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District lead agency for the design and other related tasks including bank improvements, major roadway crossings, channel stability analysis and landscape and trail improvements. The Town of Queen Creek has requested the project and will be required to assume the maintenance responsibilities of the project after completion. Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) (480.05.31) The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash from Recker to Higley Roads. Improvements have already been made to the wash upstream of Recker Road, and are under construction for the wash downstream of Higley Road as part of the District’s EMF Basins project. The Town is proposed the lead agency for design, utility relocation, construction, and construction management. The Town will be the lead agency for rights-of-way acquisition and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. A design and construction IGA has been approved, and design is underway. The proposed improvements are to replace the existing wash with a natural desert vegetated 100-year 24-hour capacity channel. The total cost of the project, excluding force, is estimated to be $2,400,000 and will be shared between the District and the Town with the District’s cost-share capped at $1,000,000. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 8,908,019 $ 3,961,987 12,870,006 $ FY 06-07 Projected 267,000 $ 54,000 321,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 5,943,000 $ 4,105,000 10,048,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 1,755,000 $ 1,755,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 2,581,000 $ 2,581,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 1,335,000 $ 1,250,000 2,585,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 11,614,000 $ 5,355,000 16,969,000 $ 20,789,019 9,370,987 30,160,006 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Salt/Gila River Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 126.01.31 - Tres Rios - located along the Salt and Gila Rivers from about 91st Avenue to the Agua Fria River 5 USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) and the City of Phoenix City of Phoenix (FCDMC to O&M the levee component) FY 2009 Project Description: The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The local sponsor is the City of Phoenix. The project is located in and along the Salt and Gila Rivers from about 91st Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The project consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river, including constructed wetlands, open water marshes, and riparian corridors. Along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River will be constructed a flood control levee with interior drainage facilities to remove property and homes along the north side of the river from the existing floodplain. The District's participation includes a $2,000,000 cash 47 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District contribution and the use of District owned rights-of-way at no cost to the City, as well as providing operation and maintenance of the levee. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ FY 06-07 Projected 1,837,447 $ 44,547 1,881,994 $ $ Year 1 FY 07-08 36,800 $ 36,800 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 1,305,000 $ 1,305,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 258,000 $ 258,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 1,563,000 $ 1,563,000 $ 3,437,247 44,547 3,481,794 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Salt River Upstream of Indian Bend Wash Project Location: 130.01.31 – Va Shyl’ay Akimel River Restoration Fourteen mile reach of the Salt River from the Granite Reef Dam to SR 101 2 USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers), City of Mesa and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community City of Mesa FY 2015 Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: Project Description: The Va Shyl’ay Akimel River Restoration project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The local sponsor is the City of Mesa. The Project encompasses a fourteen mile reach of the Salt River from the Granite Reef Dam to the Pima Freeway (SR 101) and includes the City, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, and unincorporated Maricopa County. The project consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river, including open water marshes and riparian corridors. Flood control aspects potentially include establishing a low flow channel, constructing bank stabilization, reshaping the main channel, and building a grade control structure. The District’s participation includes a $100,000 contribution to design (FY 07) and future cost sharing in the construction, anticipated to be $4,000,000. Funding/Cost Summary Funding Source Prior Yrs Actual $ Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ FY 06-07 Projected - $ - $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 48 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ 2,068,000 $ 2,068,000 $ Year 4 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 2,063,000 $ 2,063,000 $ Total Project 4,131,000 $ 4,131,000 $ 4,236,000 4,236,000 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Scatter Wash Channel Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 590.03.31 – Scatter Wash Basin & Channel - Scatter Wash immediately downstream of I-17 3, 4 Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) City of Phoenix, ADOT (O&M by the City and ADOT) FY 2008 Project Description: The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) has proposed a channel and basin improvement project for Scatter Wash at and immediately downstream (west of) Interstate 17 (I-17). This project is a joint project among ADOT, the City of Phoenix and the Flood Control District. A comprehensive IGA for design through operation and maintenance has been approved. The project will provide 100-year flood protection to this reach of Scatter Wash, and will consist of improvements to Scatter Wash at the I-17 crossing, channel improvements immediately up and downstream of I-17 and construction of an off-line basin. ADOT is the lead agency for design and construction and the City and ADOT will own, operate and maintain the project features within their jurisdiction. ADOT has a consultant under contract for the design of the project in conjunction with improvements planned for I-17, and design is moving forward to the 30% submittal. The costs are being shared 28%/28%/44% by FCDMC/City of Phoenix/ADOT. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Project Total $ $ 1,505,507 $ 1,505,507 $ FY 06-07 Projected 6,000 $ 6,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 1,044,000 $ 1,044,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 1,044,000 $ 1,044,000 $ 2,555,507 2,555,507 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Skunk Creek and New River Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 400.06.31 – New River (Grand-Skunk Creek) - the reach of New River from Grand Avenue north to the Skunk Creek confluence with New River 4 FCDMC (O&M by Peoria) City of Peoria FY 2006 Project Description: The Middle New River Watercourse Master Plan (MNRWCMP) study undertaken by the District identified projects to improve the conveyance capacity and provide bank protection along the New River. One of the recommended project areas is the reach of New River from Grand Avenue north to the Skunk Creek confluence with New River. Recommended improvements include channelization and bank protection for approximately 2 miles of New River, and an 800-foot reach on the west side of New River south of Bell Road. The City of Peoria is a project partner. The City and the District are property owners along and within the New River alignment. Intergovernmental agreements have been entered 49 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District into with the City for design, construction and operations and maintenance of the project. This is the last reach of the New River that has not been improved consistent with the Corps of Engineers' “Phoenix, Arizona and Vicinity including New River” project. The project was requested by the City of Peoria and approved for inclusion in the District's CIP. Construction of the majority of the project is complete. Design and construction of the channel under the Thunderbird Road Bridge will be completed by Peoria, and is scheduled for 2008/2009. The City of Peoria will assume the operations and maintenance responsibilities. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 64,772,853 $ 3,616,111 68,388,964 $ FY 06-07 Projected (25,001) $ 45,000 20,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 65,297,852 3,661,111 68,958,963 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 117.08.31 – Laveen Area Conveyance Channel 117.09.31 - 23rd Avenue & Roeser Road Basin 117.xx.xx – South Phoenix Detention Basins 5 117.08.31 – FCDMC (O&M by City of Phoenix and FCDMC) 117.09.31 - City of Phoenix (O&M by City of Phoenix and FCDMC) 117.xx.xx – FCDMC (O&M by City of Phoenix) City of Phoenix, SRP, MCDOT 117.08.31 - FY 2007 117.09.31 - FY 2008 117.xx.xx – FY 2011 Project Description: Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (LACC) (117.08.31) The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (LACC) is a public and private partnership to improve the existing Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility. This project, consisting of 5.8 miles of conveyance channel and a detention basin at 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue will reduce flooding in the Laveen area. The channel and basin will also function as park facilities for the City of Phoenix. FCDMC, the City of Phoenix, and MCDOT shared the Project costs, with MCDOT contributing $1,000,000 and the FCDMC and City of Phoenix cost sharing 50/50 of the remaining Project costs (approximately $9,000,000 each). Construction of the channel and basin is complete. The irrigation and landscaping for the basin and channel is complete. The basin and channel upstream of Station 43+00 is being turned over to the City. The channel downstream of Station 43+00 will continue to be owned and maintained by FCDMC. 50 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Storm Drain & Detention Basin (117.09.31) The 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Storm Drain & Detention Basin is identified as an element for regional flood control infrastructure as defined by the recommended plan for the South Phoenix / Laveen Drainage Improvement Project. A proposed 10-acre detention basin, to be located on the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Roeser Road, will intercept flows from the north and the east. The Basin will be designed to intercept flows from a 100-year storm and will then discharge flows into a storm drain system to be constructed along Roeser Road to 27th Avenue from Roeser Road to Broadway Road where it will connect to an existing 108-inch storm drain that will convey the flows to the Salt River. The City of Phoenix is the lead agency for all project tasks, and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The City and the District are sharing equally in the project costs. Design is complete and construction will occur in FY 2008. South Phoenix Detention Basins (117.xx.xx) The South Phoenix Detention Basins are identified as elements for regional flood control infrastructure as defined by the recommended plan for the South Phoenix / Laveen Drainage Improvement Project. Proposed detention basins, to be located at the northeast corner of Baseline Road and 43rd Avenue, and at the northeast corner of South Mountain Avenue and 27th Avenue, are located along the existing Baseline Road and 43rd Avenue storm drain system. The completed system will intercept flows from a 100-year storm and will convey the flows to the Salt River. The Flood Control District is the lead agency for design and construction, and the City of Phoenix will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The City and the District are sharing equally in the project costs. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 24,550,047 $ 10,038,422 34,588,469 $ FY 06-07 Projected 522,304 $ 200,000 722,304 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 426,000 $ 400,000 826,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 3,454,000 $ 3,250,000 6,704,000 $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 6,780,000 $ 3,650,000 10,430,000 $ 31,852,351 13,888,422 45,740,773 Operating Cost Summary Current Year Current Project Operating Costs for User Department Personal Services $ 6,531 Supplies & Services 19,679 $ 26,210 Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Services $ 6,531 Supplies & Services 19,679 $ 26,210 Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Services $ Supplies & Services $ - Year 1 FY 07-08 $ $ $ $ $ $ 51 Year 2 FY 08- 09 13,062 20,368 33,430 $ 15,562 21,868 37,430 $ 2,500 1,500 4,000 $ $ $ $ Year 3 FY 09-10 13,519 21,081 34,600 $ 16,107 22,633 38,740 $ 2,588 1,553 4,140 $ $ $ $ Year 4 FY 10-11 Year 5 FY 11-12 13,992 21,818 35,811 $ 14,482 22,582 $ 37,064 $ 14,989 23,372 $ 38,361 16,670 23,426 40,096 $ 17,254 24,245 $ 41,499 $ 17,858 25,094 $ 42,952 2,678 1,607 4,285 $ 2,772 1,663 $ 4,435 $ $ 2,869 1,722 4,590 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 420.02.31- Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road Storm Drain and Basin; located between 90th Street and the Spook Hill FRS, and between McDowell Road and Hermosa Vista Road 420.03.31- McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain; located along McDowell Road from Hawes Road to west of Sossaman Road 420.xx.xx- TBD Spook Hill ADMP projects 2 FCDMC (O&M by Mesa and FCDMC) City of Mesa, possibly MCDOT 420.02.31 – FY 2010 420.03.31 – FY 2008 Post 5-year CIP Project Description: Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road Drainage System (420.02.31) The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan updated and expanded the existing Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Study conducted in 1987. A preferred alternative has been chosen and adopted by the City of Mesa City Council and Flood Control District Board of Directors. The project includes a storm drain that will tie into the existing Madrid basin at 90th Street and McDowell, go west along McDowell Road, south along Hawes Road and west along Hermosa Vista Drive to the Spook Hill Flood Retarding Structure. A retention basin will be located at Hawes Road and Culver Street. The drainage system will provide 100-year storm protection. An intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between the City of Mesa and the District has been approved for design, which will be complete in early 2008. A separate IGA will be negotiated for the project construction, operation and maintenance. McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain System (420.03.31) The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan also identified a project along McDowell Road from Hawes Road to west of Sossaman Road. The project includes a detention basin at the south west corner of Sossaman Road and McDowell Road and a storm drain along McDowell Road from Hawes Road to just west of Sossaman Road. The drainage system will provide 100-year storm protection. Design is complete. An intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between the City of Mesa and the District has been approved for design, and a separate IGA will be negotiated for the project construction, operation and maintenance. Construction is anticipated to start in mid-2008 and last approximately one year. Spook Hill ADMP (420.xx.xx) The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan updated and expanded the existing Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Study conducted in 1987. Since the 1987 study, much of the watershed has been developed, additional drainage infrastructure now exists, and man-made changes have occurred in the watershed. The Spook Hill area in east Mesa currently does not have the flood control and drainage facilities in place to handle its regional flood problems. The approximate watershed area is 16 square miles. The study identified current area flooding problems and produced a recommended alternative to resolve the current flooding problems. A preferred alternative has been chosen and adopted by the 52 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District City and County officials. The recommended plan is a series of underground pipes, open channels, and offline detention basins to reduce the flooding in the area and provide a 100-year level of protection Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 7,531,461 $ 109,833 7,641,294 $ FY 06-07 Projected 501,000 $ 272,000 773,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 144,000 $ 950,000 1,094,000 $ 4,691,000 $ 1,670,000 6,361,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 Year 4 FY 10-11 5,502,000 $ 1,865,000 7,367,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 769,000 $ 2,365,000 3,134,000 $ 5-Year Total 2,657,000 $ 2,500,000 5,157,000 $ Total Project 13,763,000 $ 9,350,000 23,113,000 $ 21,795,460 9,731,833 31,527,293 Operating Cost Summary Not applicable Town of Guadalupe Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 035.04.31 – Guadalupe – ADOT Pit Modifications 1 035.04.31 – City of Tempe (O&M by Tempe) City of Tempe 035.04.31 - FY 2009 Project Description: This is the final component of the Guadalupe Drainage Improvements project that includes four detention basins and a storm drain system within the Town of Guadalupe. The project captures and conveys the 10-year storm event within the Town and east of Avenida Del Yaqui. Runoff from within the Town results in flooding of low-lying houses and collects along the Highline Canal where it eventually overtops the canal and causes damage to downstream properties within Tempe. The ADOT Pit Modification component is to include a pump station that will be located in a large drainage basin near I-10 & Warner Road. In accordance with the IGA the pump station must be completed by the end of FY 2008/2009. The Town will own, operate and maintain this project. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 8,564,048 $ 86,315 8,650,363 $ FY 06-07 Projected 1,000 $ 1,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 53 Year 3 FY 09-10 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 8,580,048 86,315 8,666,363 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District White Tanks – Agua Fria Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 470.04.30 – White Tanks FRS #3 Modifications north of Bethany Home Road, west of the Beardsley Canal 470.04.31 – White Tanks #3 North Inlet Channel Olive Avenue near the Beardsley Canal 470.04.32 – White Tanks FRS#3 Outlet Channel 470.12.31 – Reems Road Channel - west side of Reems Road, south of Peoria Avenue and a 42-acre basin north of Olive Avenue 470.13.31 – Bullard Wash Channel – Phase 2 470.14.31 – Loop 303 Drainage Improvements 470.xx.xx – Northern Parkway Channel Project 470.xx.xx – ATSF Channel - Northern Parkway 470.xx.xx – Elm Lane Drainage – in Avondale 470.xx.xx – Litchfield Park Storm Drain – in Litchfield Park 4, 5 470.04.30 – FCDMC (FCDMC to O&M) 470.04.31 – FCDMC (FCDMC and MWD to O&M) 470.12.31 – FCDMC (FCDMC to O&M) 470.13.31 – FCDMC (Goodyear to O&M) 470.14.31 - FCDMC/ADOT (Goodyear/ADOT/FCD to O&M) 470.xx.xx – Northern Parkway Channel Project – MCDOT to O&M 470.xx.xx – ATSF Channel - Northern Parkway – MCDOT to O&M 470.xx.xx - Elm Lane - FCDMC (Avondale to O&M) 470.xx.xx – Litchfield Park (Litchfield Park to O&M) ADOT, City of Goodyear, City of Glendale, City of Surprise, Maricopa Water District, MCDOT, NRCS, Avondale, Litchfield Park 470.04.30 - FY 2009 470.04.31 - FY 2009 470.12.31 - FY 2009 470.13.31 - FY 2015 470.14.31 – FY 2015 470.xx.xx – FY2010 (Northern Parkway Channel) 470.xx.xx – FY2010 (ATSF Channel – Northern Parkway) 470.xx.xx – FY2010 (Elm Lane) 470.xx.xx – FY2010 (Litchfield Park) 54 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Project Description: White Tanks FRS #3 Modifications (470.04.30) White Tanks FRS #3 is ranked first in the nation by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under their dam rehabilitation priority ranking process. The District and NRCS, therefore, propose to proceed with the Project under “The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Amendment” (Public Law 106472), which authorizes NRCS to assist watershed project sponsors with rehabilitation of aging dams on a 65% federal, 35% local cost share basis. The District and NRCS completed the final work plan and environmental assessment in 2004. The District developed and signed an IGA with NRCS in 2004 In FY 2003-2004, under Contract FCD 2003C014, alternatives were evaluated that would maintain the same flood protection as the existing dam. The project alternative selected was a dam modification. The Phase 1 dam modification design was completed during fiscal year 2004-2005 and the District awarded a construction contract for Phase 1 in 2005. Phase 2 design is currently in progress and scheduled for completion in calendar year 2007. It is intended that White Tanks FRS #3 Rehabilitation Project will be constructed in four phases as follows: Phase I: White Tanks FRS #3 Rehabilitation Phase I Phase II: White Tanks FRS #3 Rehabilitation Phase II Phase III: White Tanks FRS #3 North Inlet Channel Improvements from Olive to Northern Avenues Phase IV White Tanks FRS #3 North Inlet Channel Improvements from Northern Avenue to White Tanks FRS #3 The federal cost share for Phase I is estimated to be $9.5 million. Federal funds for Phases I and II have been allocated in the amount of $13.5 million. It is intended that cost sharing for remainder of Phase II will be supplements to the IGA; however, federal funding of Phase II will be subject to future approval of federal appropriations. The District will continue to operate and maintain the rehabilitated dam. White Tanks FRS #3 North Inlet Channel (470.04.31) The White Tanks FRS #3 North Inlet Channel (NIC) Project includes a two-mile long earthen flood control channel from just north of Olive Avenue to the Glendale Avenue alignment, outletting to the White Tanks FRS#3; diversion structures/box culverts at Olive and Northern Avenues; erosion protection at Cholla Wash; and aesthetic treatments per District policy. The NIC Project will provide 100-year level of protection. Construction of the Channel will prevent 100-year flows from Waterfall Wash and Cholla Wash from flowing southeast over the Beardsley Canal, protecting existing and future development. The Maricopa Water District will be responsible for maintaining the box culverts and channel north of Northern Avenue. The District will maintain the inlet structure at Olive Avenue, the box culvert at Beardsley Wash and Northern Avenue, and the channel south of Northern Avenue. MWD and FCDMC are cost sharing at 50/50 for the Project costs, including the value of the MWD rights-ofway. MCDOT is contributing approximately $120,000 to extend the box culvert at Olive Avenue to accommodate the ultimate roadway width. White Tanks FRS #3 Outlet Channel (470.04.32) The White Tanks FRS#3 Outlet Channel is being studied as part of the White Tanks FRS#4 Dam Rehabilitation and Channels Project planning effort (201.02.31 and 201.01.31). The recommended channel configuration and alignment will be completed in FY 2007-08. To date no partners have been identified to date for this channel project and the entity or agency that would perform O&M therefore has not been determined. 55 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Reems Road Channel (470.12.31) This Project will provide a flood control channel along the west side of Reems Road, south of Peoria Avenue and a new 42-acre basin north of Olive Avenue. The channel and basin will provide 100-year flood protection and outlet to the Dysart Drain within the Falcon Dunes Golf Course. The City of Surprise is constructing the channel from Peoria Avenue north to Waddell Road, and the District is constructing the channel and basin south of Peoria Avenue, and also may cost-share with the City of Surprise on the box culvert to be constructed at Cactus Road. The City of Surprise is cost-sharing 100% of Project costs at Peoria and north of Peoria Ave. The District is cost-sharing 100% of Project costs south of Peoria Avenue and to the outfall at Falcon Dunes Golf Course. The District will maintain the channel south of Peoria Avenue and the new basin. MCDOT will maintain the box culverts at Olive Avenue and at the outlet crossing Reems Road. MCDOT is contributing approximately $1,128,000 to extend two box culverts to accommodate the ultimate roadway width. Two adjacent landowners are also contributing approximately $100,000 each to extend box culverts to accommodate their development needs. Bullard Wash Phase 2 (470.13.31) Phase I of the Bullard Wash Improvements Project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a previous District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and detention basin just north of I-10, from Estrella Parkway to Dysart Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This storm water will otherwise collect in streets, businesses, farm fields, and residential areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to I-10 is complete and intergovernmental agreements with the City for construction of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road are in place. Construction will take place when City and District funding is available, currently estimated to be 2012. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470.14.31) The proposed project from ADOT will consist of a regional channel and basin system on the west side of the future Loop 303. The District is anticipating cost-sharing 21% of the project. The Total cost is estimated to be $140 million. The District is currently working with ADOT to develop agreements on this project. Northern Parkway Channel (470.xx.xx) The proposed project from MCDOT and Glendale will consist of a 100 year regional channel along the north side of the proposed Northern Parkway from the Loop 303 Alignment to Reems Road and then continue southerly to the south west corner of the existing Falcon Dunes retention basin. The District is anticipating cost-sharing between 20 to 50% of the project. The Total cost is estimated to be $4 million. The District is currently working with Glendale and MCDOT to develop agreements for this project. ATSF Channel & Northern Parkway (470.xx.xx) The proposed project from MCDOT and Glendale will consist of a 100 year regional channel along the north side of the proposed Northern Parkway from the Reems Road to the ATSF railroad Alignment and then continue southerly and outfall into the Dysart Drains. The District is anticipating cost-sharing between 20 to 50% of the project. The Total cost is estimated to be $6 million. The District is currently working with Glendale and MCDOT to develop agreements for this project. Elm Lane Drainage (470.xx.xx) The proposed project from the City of Avondale will consist of a small basin and storm drain system. Both a Resolution and an IGA will need to be developed with the City. It is anticipated that the District will be the lead agency and will fund 50% of the project cost. 56 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Litchfield Park Storm Drain (470.xx.xx) The proposed project is the final phase of a storm drain system within Litchfield Park. The District and the City participated in the previous phases of the project. A project Resolution and an IGA will need to be developed in order to implement the project. It is anticipated that the City will take the lead for all tasks and that the District will share in 50% of the project costs. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 55,809,549 $ 5,198,125 61,007,674 $ FY 06-07 Projected 14,598,999 $ 5,778,000 20,376,999 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 3,437,000 $ 6,582,000 10,019,000 $ Year 3 FY 09-10 16,224,000 $ 4,731,000 20,955,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 6,141,000 $ 2,375,000 8,516,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 4,806,000 $ 1,125,000 5,931,000 $ 5-Year Total 10,095,000 $ 3,490,000 13,585,000 $ 40,703,000 18,303,000 59,006,000 Total Project $ $ 111,111,548 29,279,125 140,390,673 Operating Cost Summary Current Year Current Project Operating Costs for User Department Personal Services $ 34,351 Supplies & Services 95,814 $ 130,165 Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Services $ 34,351 Supplies & Services 95,814 $ 130,165 Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Services $ Supplies & Services $ - Year 1 FY 07-08 $ 68,702 191,628 260,330 $ $ 93,702 196,628 290,330 $ $ 25,000 5,000 30,000 $ 57 Year 2 FY 08- 09 $ $ $ $ $ $ 71,107 198,335 269,442 96,982 203,510 300,492 25,875 5,175 31,050 Year 3 FY 09-10 $ $ $ $ $ $ 73,595 205,277 278,872 100,376 210,633 311,009 26,781 5,356 32,137 Year 4 FY 10-11 $ $ $ $ $ $ Year 5 FY 11-12 76,171 212,461 288,633 $ 78,837 219,898 $ 298,735 103,889 218,005 321,894 $ 107,525 225,635 $ 333,160 27,718 5,544 33,262 $ 28,688 5,738 $ 34,426 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District White Tanks FRS #4 and Channels Project Location: Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 201.02.31 – White Tanks #4 Dam Rehabilitation Van Buren Street, west of Tuthill Road 201.01.31 – White Tanks #4 Outlet Channel to Gila River 4 FCDMC NRCS may participate in the Dam Rehabilitation ($5M) FY 2014 Project Description: White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure #4 (White Tanks FRS #4 – 201.02.31), operated and maintained by the District, requires corrective action to bring the structure into compliance with current dam safety standards and requirements. In addition an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS #4 to the Gila River is required (201.01.31). The District has completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS #4. The Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) has classified the dam as having safety deficiencies that require corrective action. These deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, left spillway adequacy, and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has also identified these same deficiencies that require corrective action. The District submitted an Application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004. The District has initiated the alternatives evaluation and pre-design efforts under the operating budget for the project in fiscal years 2005/2006/2007. Recommended channel configurations, alignments, and rehabilitation or replacement of White Tanks FRS #4 will be completed in FY 2007-08. The project may be divided into two separate projects. Initially, the reconstructed dam will not require the current level of maintenance; however, the long-term maintenance requirements will be similar to today’s efforts. Maintenance of the dam or basin to replace the dam will be performed by the District. To date no partners have been identified to date for white Tanks FRS#3 Outlet Channel Project and the entity or agency that would perform O&M therefore has not been determined. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 2,246,579 $ 2,246,579 $ FY 06-07 Projected 10,000 $ 10,000 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 Year 2 FY 08-09 - $ - $ 774,000 $ 774,000 $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 58 Year 3 FY 09-10 3,719,000 $ 2,500,000 6,219,000 $ Year 4 FY 10-11 7,814,000 $ 2,500,000 10,314,000 $ Year 5 FY 11-12 5-Year Total 8,251,000 $ 8,251,000 $ Total Project 20,558,000 $ 5,000,000 25,558,000 $ 22,814,579 5,000,000 27,814,579 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District Wickenburg Area Drainage Master Plan Project Location: 343.01.31 – Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Mitigation - along the Sols Wash from the proposed SR93/Hassayampa River to approximately Hospital Wash Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Completion Date: 4 FCDMC (O&M by Wickenburg) Town of Wickenburg, ADOT FY 2009 Project Description: The project includes facilities along the Sols Wash from the proposed SR93/Hassayampa River to approximately Hospital Wash to mitigate 100-year storm flows that cause flooding hazards to downtown Wickenburg. This project will remove a floodplain from approximately 120 residences. Additionally, this project works in conjunction with the proposed ADOT SR-93 Interim Bypass Project roadway embankment to protect the downtown of Wickenburg from the existing Sols Wash and Hassayampa River FEMA delineated floodplain. The Town of Wickenburg will assume operation and maintenance responsibility for the flood control improvements. Design is complete, and construction is scheduled to begin in mid-2007 with a one-year duration. Funding/Cost Summary Prior Yrs Actual Funding Source Flood Control Dist. Property Taxes Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ $ 4,714,345 $ 85,162 4,799,507 $ FY 06-07 Projected 1,169,366 $ 1,206,000 2,375,366 $ Year 1 FY 07-08 7,893,000 $ 50,000 7,943,000 $ Year 2 FY 08-09 (25,000) $ 25,000 - $ Operating Cost Summary Not applicable 59 Year 3 FY 09-10 Year 4 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 11-12 - $ - $ 5-Year Total - $ - $ Total Project 7,868,000 $ 75,000 7,943,000 $ 13,751,711 1,366,162 15,117,873 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control District 60 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Fulton Brock, Chairman, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District recommended expenditure budget for 2007-08 is $20,717,140. The recommended revenue budget is $22,898,437. The tax rate has been reduced from $0.0507 to $0.0391 per $100 of assessed value due to the direction by the Board of Directors to implement a 2% levy cap, excluding new construction, in order to protect taxpayers from tax increases due to increased assessed property values. In FY 2006-07, the District opened the new Civic Center Library in Avondale and soon will open the new Perry Branch Library in Gilbert. The District administrative offices moved out of the Campbell Branch Library into leased space in downtown Phoenix. Plans are progressing to sell the Campbell Branch Library to Paradise Valley Community College for $4 million. The District has seen continued growth in the use of the District’s libraries by the residents of the County. In the first six months of FY 2006-07, circulation of library materials is up 7.8%, web page use is up 14.6%, and electronic database use is up 17.8%. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager On June 18, 2007, the Maricopa County Library District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2007-08 budget totaling $20,731,201. This represents a $14,061 increase from the recommended budget of $20,717,140 due to increases in Risk Management charges. On August 20, 2007 the Board of Supervisors adopted the tax rates. 61 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Library District Analysis by Vic Wickersham, Management & Budget Analyst Organizational Chart Library District Board of Directors County Manager Assistant County Manager Community Services Library Director/County Librarian Library Director/County Librarian Harry Courtright Harry Courtright Branch Libraries Regional Libraries Information Services Library Administration Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. Strategic Goals • Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: The department implemented a customer comment system which allows customers to request materials be added to the collection. This allows direct feedback about what materials would satisfy customers. The customer satisfaction rating for FY 2006-07 was 86.6%. • By June 30, 2008, increase resource usage to meet or exceed the average increase of 10 benchmark libraries. Status: The District is making progress towards this goal with the expansion of electronic databases for County libraries, upgraded computers, and the library card sign-up campaign for children. For FY 2006-07 the District was 7th for circulations per capita but ranked last of five libraries reporting in the category of “users of electronic resources”. The District is anticipating 62 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District the latest results from the Arizona State Statistical Report and the Public Library Association's Public Library Data Service Statistical report in the near future. • By June 30, 2009, increase the number of active (card is used at least 3 times in 12 months) cardholders by 40% over the 89,593 cardholders on June 30, 2004. Status: The Library District partnered with Childsplay to present a play encouraging library use to children which was held in conjunction with a library card enrollment drive. The FY 2007-08 budget continues to support this goal. Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: The FY 2007-08 budget supports the attainment of this goal. The Library District just recently began an on-line serial novel for children series. 6,000,000 $3.50 5,000,000 $3.00 $2.50 4,000,000 $2.00 3,000,000 $1.50 2,000,000 $1.00 1,000,000 $0.50 $0.00 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED Output 63 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED Cost per Item Circulated Cost/Item Circulated Public Library Services Activity Performance # of Items Circulated • Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Budget Summary Sources of Funds Sources of Funds (Excluding Fund Balance) $22,898,437 Permits, Fees & Fines, $550,000 Miscellaneous & Interest, $684,586 Other Intergovernmental & Grants, $2,500,331 Property Taxes, Penalties & Interest, $19,163,520 Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $20,731,201 Information Technology, $1,168,890 Administrative Services, $3,009,369 Public Library Service, $16,552,942 64 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Total Budget by Program and Activity FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE CMMS - COMMONS INSV - INFORMATION SERVICES MAPC - MATERIALS, PROGRAMS & OUTREACH $ 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG $ 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE CMMS - COMMONS INSV - INFORMATION SERVICES MAPC - MATERIALS, PROGRAMS & OUTREACH FY 2006-07 ADOPTED 2,171,649 $ 870,862 (55,535) 1,356,323 FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2006-07 PROJECTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 963,500 39,400 924,100 $ 1,422,057 136,325 1,285,732 $ 1,224,131 264,416 959,715 $ 3,129,822 3,129,822 $ 356,041 $ 356,291 $ 341,213 $ 402,266 $ 1,707,765 (136,325) 1,844,090 143.4% 375,309 $ $ 190 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 17,185,668 19,732,816 $ $ 18,676,283 19,995,824 $ $ 18,676,283 20,454,631 $ $ 18,173,282 19,738,626 $ $ 19,366,349 22,898,437 $ $ 690,066 2,443,806 3.7% 11.9% $ 14,385,656 $ 2,185,440 375,329 11,824,887 13,911,659 $ 1,224,715 1,346,458 11,340,486 16,537,345 16,537,345 $ (867,989) 1,142,342 1,453,200 (3,463,531) -5.5% 100.0% 100.0% -26.5% 14,018,915 $ 706,183 1,126,689 12,186,043 15,669,356 $ 1,142,342 1,453,200 13,073,814 45,975 120.1% -100.0% 12.9% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG $ 2,523,735 $ 2,362,255 $ 2,421,342 $ 2,544,431 $ 2,181,446 $ 239,896 9.9% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM $ 719,219 $ 1,542,873 $ 1,326,276 $ 1,089,388 $ 1,168,890 $ 157,386 11.9% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS $ $ 922,089 18,550,699 $ $ 1,024,336 18,948,379 $ $ 1,024,336 20,441,310 $ $ 1,289,178 18,834,656 $ $ 843,520 20,731,201 $ $ 180,816 (289,891) 17.7% -1.4% Total Budget by Category FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE Taxes Intergovernmental Charges For Service Fines & Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenues Total Revenue EXPENDITURES Personal Services Supplies Services Other Financing Uses Capital Outlay Total Expenditures $ $ $ $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED 16,976,551 946,082 48,496 621,684 1,140,003 19,732,816 $ 8,060,651 5,058,626 2,809,077 913,614 1,708,731 18,550,699 $ $ $ FY 2006-07 REVISED 18,401,410 337,933 70,000 550,000 636,481 19,995,824 $ 9,103,516 5,400,141 3,884,274 560,448 18,948,379 $ $ $ FY 2006-07 PROJECTED 18,401,410 777,990 70,000 550,000 655,231 20,454,631 $ 9,613,545 5,691,280 4,686,231 450,254 20,441,310 $ $ $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED 17,927,250 457,952 28,923 547,589 776,912 19,738,626 $ 9,097,311 5,111,196 4,042,799 583,350 18,834,656 $ $ $ REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % 19,163,520 237,829 2,262,502 550,000 684,586 22,898,437 $ 10,313,139 5,105,834 4,882,433 429,795 20,731,201 $ $ 762,110 (540,161) 2,192,502 29,355 2,443,806 4.1% -69.4% 3132.1% 0.0% 4.5% 11.9% (699,594) 585,446 (196,202) 20,459 (289,891) -7.3% 10.3% -4.2% $ 4.5% -1.4% Total Budget by Fund FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL FUNDS $ EXPENDITURES 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL FUNDS $ 115,983 19,616,833 19,732,816 115,982 18,434,717 18,550,699 FY 2006-07 ADOPTED $ $ $ $ 25,000 19,970,824 19,995,824 25,000 18,923,379 18,948,379 65 FY 2006-07 REVISED $ $ $ $ 90,057 20,364,574 20,454,631 90,057 20,351,253 20,441,310 FY 2006-07 PROJECTED $ $ $ $ 43,326 19,695,300 19,738,626 43,326 18,791,330 18,834,656 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED $ $ $ $ 25,000 22,873,437 22,898,437 25,000 20,706,201 20,731,201 VARIANCE $ $ $ $ % (65,057) 2,508,863 2,443,806 -72.2% 12.3% 11.9% 65,057 (354,948) (289,891) 72.2% -1.7% -1.4% Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Personnel by Program and Activity FY 2006-07 REVISED FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE CMMS - COMMONS INSV - INFORMATION SERVICES MAPC - MATERIALS, PROGRAMS & OUTREACH BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % 132.94 3.00 26.00 103.94 1.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 131.45 131.45 1.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 (1.49) (3.00) (26.00) 27.51 2.00 (1.00) -1.1% -100.0% -100.0% 26.5% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% -14.3% 16.00 17.00 6.3% 15.00 163.94 13.00 161.45 1.00 (2.00) (2.49) 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 2007-08 ADOPTED -13.3% -1.5% The District requested 2.49 FTE less than the FY 2006-07 revised budget due to the successful reorganization and restructure of service delivery. Thousands Mandated vs. Non-Mandated Expenditures $22,000 $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED PROJECTED MANDATED NON-MANDATED 66 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Programs and Activities Public Library Services Program The purpose of the Public Library Services Program is to provide resources, activities, and skilled assistance to our customers, so that their needs, interests and goals are met. Program Results Percent of library users who report that they received the information in a timely manner FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT RECOMM (Rev. - Rec.) % 91.0% 92.0% 92.0% 88.0% 92.0% 0.0% 0.0% Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so that they get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: None. Performance Analysis: Demand Number of items expected to be circulated Output Number of items circulated Percent of Demand met Efficiency Expenditures per unit of Output Revenues by Fund Library District Grants Library District Totals Expenditures by Fund Library District Grants Library District Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ $ $ $ $ FY 2005-06 ACTUAL 4,271,158 ADOPTED 4,300,000 FY 2006-07 REVISED 4,300,000 PROJ ACT 4,800,000 FY 2007-08 RECOMM 5,300,000 Variance (Rev. - Rec.) 1,000,000 % 23.3% 4,271,158 4,300,000 4,300,000 4,800,000 5,300,000 1,000,000 23.3% 100.0% 2.77 $ 103,073 1,253,250 1,356,323 $ 89,448 11,735,439 11,824,887 - $ $ $ 100.0% 2.83 $ 25,000 899,100 924,100 $ 25,000 12,161,043 12,186,043 - $ 100.0% 3.04 $ 90,057 1,195,675 1,285,732 $ 90,057 12,983,757 13,073,814 103.94 $ $ $ 67 $ $ 100.0% 2.36 $ 11,725 916,389 928,114 $ 43,326 11,297,160 11,340,486 - $ $ $ 100.0% 3.12 $ 0.0% (0.08) 0.0% -2.6% (65,057) 1,909,147 1,844,090 -72.2% 159.7% 143.4% (65,057) 3,530,124 $ (3,465,067) 27.51 -72.2% 27.2% -26.5% 26.5% 25,000 3,104,822 3,129,822 $ 25,000 16,513,881 16,538,881 131.45 $ $ Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District 6,000,000 $3.50 5,000,000 $3.00 $2.50 4,000,000 $2.00 3,000,000 $1.50 2,000,000 $1.00 1,000,000 Cost/Item Circulated # of Items Circulated Public Library Services Activity Performance $0.50 $0.00 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED Output FY 2007-08 RECOMMENDED Cost per Item Circulated The FY 2007-08 budget for the Library District shows an increase in the cost per unit from $2.36 to $3.12. The increase in this activity is a result of the District’s revised Strategic Plan for FY 2007-08 that consolidates three activities into one. The District shows a 500,000 increase in FY 2007-08 for the number of items circulated compared to the projection for FY 2006-07. The District has been experiencing about a 500,000 increase each year and expects this trend to continue. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate. Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Fiscal Year (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy 1996-97 $ 14,343,156 $ 0.0421 $ 6,038,469 1997-98 15,723,498 0.0421 6,619,593 1998-99 16,813,017 0.0421 7,078,280 1999-00 18,676,830 0.0421 7,862,946 2000-01 20,877,716 0.0421 8,586,315 2001-02 22,913,134 0.0421 9,646,430 2002-03 24,457,047 0.0421 10,182,607 2003-04 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 2004-05 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 2005-06 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 2006-07 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 2007-08 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. 68 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District The schedule above lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last eleven fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2007-08. The Library District’s property tax rate has been reduced to $0.0391 per $100 net assessed value, a difference of ($0.0116) from FY 2006-07. As reflected in the graph below, the tax rate is declining for the second year in response to increased the secondary net assessed values. 60 $0.0600 50 $0.0500 40 $0.0400 30 $0.0300 20 $0.0200 10 $0.0100 0 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value Vs. Tax Rate $99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Fiscal Year The FY 2007-08 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $19,163,520, an increase of $762,110, (4.14%) from the FY 2006-07 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, property tax revenue growth was tempered in Fiscal Year 2006-07 and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2007-08 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT: FY 2007-08 Adopted FY 2006-07 Adopted Variance $ $ $ 49,534,573,831 36,294,693,601 13,239,880,230 Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value $ $ $ Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP 518,745,464 $ 542,156,376 $ (23,410,912) $ 50,053,319,295 36,836,849,977 13,216,469,318 69 Revenue from 1-cent Levy Tax Rates $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,005,332 3,683,685 1,321,647 SRP Payment in Lieu of Taxes Total Tax Levy & Property Tax Levy (PILT) PILT 0.0391 $ 0.0507 $ (0.0116) $ 19,368,018 18,401,410 966,608 $ $ $ 202,829 $ 274,873 $ (72,044) $ 19,570,847 18,676,283 894,564 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Levy Limit FY 2006-07 Library District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 18,401,410 18,769,438 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value (partially estimated*) $ 47,945,114,422 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value $ 49,534,573,831 D. Recommended Calculation D3. Recommended Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Divided by 100) D5. Recommended Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.0391 19,368,018 966,608 5.3% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 45,327,621,689 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 2,617,492,733 Total $ 47,945,114,422 Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2007-08 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 3.0% of levied taxes go unpaid. While a portion (approximately 2.0%) are paid in the following tax year, approximately 1.0% are never paid, or are not levied due to resolutions which actually reduce assessed value amounts. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2007-08 2006-07 $ Levy Amount Estimated Collections 19,368,018 $ 18,791,532 18,401,410 371,988 Total Estimated Revenue: $ 19,163,520 Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. 70 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2001-02 $ 191,864 2002-03 186,473 2003-04 252,593 2004-05 281,442 2005-06 270,953 2006-07* 246,032 2007-08** 202,829 * Projected Actual ** Budget Grants The Library District applies for a variety of grants from State, Federal and other sources. The chart below illustrates the grants for FY 2006-07 and FY 2007-08. Grant Revenue FY 2006-07 $ 25,000 63,057 2,000 $ 90,057 State Grant In Aid Gates Library Initiative Target Corporation TOTAL FY 2007-08 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2006-07* Gilbert, Perry Branch Library $ 300,000 Surprise/Hollyhock 75,000.00 Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library 24,500.00 services) Maricopa County Planning (space rental) 4,485.00 Maricopa County Special Healthcare District 9,075.00 (automation services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library Civic Center Library TOTAL $ 413,060 FY 2007-08 $ 1,063,752 75,000 25,030 10,000 $ 848,720 250,000 2,272,502 *FY 2006-07 Other Intergovernmental revenue is reclassified as Intergovernmental Charges for Services above. 71 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Fines and Forfeits Fiscal Year 2001-02 $ 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07* 2007-08** The District collects fines in accord with the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2001-02 through FY 2005-06, the projected amount for FY 2006-07 and the anticipated amount for FY 2007-08. Fines 256,605 339,099 479,128 524,082 621,684 547,589 550,000 * Projected ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07* 2007-08** The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart at the left illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2001-02 through the FY 2007-08 budget. The graph below illustrates the types of miscellaneous revenues recorded for fiscal years 2001-02 through 2005-06. Miscellaneous Revenue $ 374,637 $ 311,046 $ 531,961 $ 740,186 $ 1,140,257 $ 776,912 $ 684,586 * Projected ** Budget Sou rces of Miscellaneous Revenue Other $1,200,000 Interest $1,000,000 Donations $800,000 Copies $600,000 Vending $400,000 Building Rental $200,000 $FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 72 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2007-08. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Fund designations are explained in greater detail later in this section. A list of fund balance designations is provided below. Estimated beginning fund balances for FY 2007-08 are based on audited actual ending fund balances for FY 2005-06, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). For governmental funds, the “unreserved fund balance” is used. Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Unreserved/ Undesignated Beginning Fund Balance SPECIAL REVENUE 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FUNDS $ $ 6,194,934 6,194,934 Revenue & Transfers In $ $ 25,000 22,873,437 22,898,437 Expenditures & Transfers Out $ 25,000 20,706,201 20,731,201 $ Unreserved/ Undesignated Ending Fund Balance Operating Expenditures $ $ 25,000 20,706,201 20,731,201 $ 8,362,170 8,362,170 $ Fund Designations The following schedule lists amounts designated within the estimated balances of the Library District’s operating fund. Designations are the District’s self-imposed limitations on financial resources that would otherwise be available for use. The major fund balance designation is for budget stabilization to ensure that sufficient cash is set aside to cover shortfalls during the fiscal year due to the property tax collection cycle. FY 2007-08 Fund Balance Designations Fund/Designation Library District (Fund 244) Budget Stabilization: Cash Flow/Property Tax FY 2006-07 $ 2,436,203 FY 2007-08 $ 2,719,171 (Inc.)/Dec. $ (282,968) (1) (1) Based on estimate of the amount needed to eliminate the need for Tax Anticipation Notes or other forms of short-term borrowing to finance current operations. 73 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Library District Grants (242) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 25,000 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Gates Foundation grant carry over Target Corporation grant $ REVENUE 25,000 $ Subtotal $ 63,057 2,000 65,057 $ 63,057 2,000 65,057 $ 90,057 $ 90,057 FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: $ 90,057 $ 90,057 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: One Time Expenses One-Time Revenue $ FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: Subtotal $ (65,057) $ (65,057) $ (65,057) (65,057) FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: $ 25,000 $ 25,000 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ 25,000 $ 25,000 74 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District Library District (244) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 18,923,379 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: IGA with City of Surprise Cash donation Town of Gilbert capital Lease & moving Admin offices IGA with City of Avondale Cash donation Exec Compensation Pkg Cash donation IGA with Gilbert-Perry Branch Sale of Equipment $ FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Employee Health/Dental Plan Changes (12 months) Retirement Contributions FY 2007-08 Pay for Performance Annualization of Mid-Year Adjustments Annualization of FY 2007 Initiatives One Time Expenses One-Time Revenue Property Taxes Central Service Cost Allocation $ Subtotal $ 75,000 750 290,413 593,179 150,000 750 32,055 13,000 272,727 1,427,874 $ 75,000 750 13,000 300,000 5,000 393,750 $ 20,351,253 $ 20,364,574 $ Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: Revenue Submission Over Target BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Salary & Benefit Savings Property Taxes - Levy increase Risk Management increases 763,752 436,720 (18,000) 966,608 2,149,080 20,835,659 $ 22,513,654 $ - $ 40,653 (143,519) $ 14,061 (129,458) $ 319,130 319,130 Subtotal $ $ 75 107,567 $ 33,399 236,504 694,320 124,568 (688,413) (23,539) 484,406 $ $ $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: REVENUE 19,970,824 20,706,201 $ 22,873,437 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Library District 76 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Fulton Brock, Chairman, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District recommended expenditure budget for 2007-08 is $12,371,984. Included in this amount is funding for $1 million to begin Phase II for the Chase Field Suite Renovations, $1.2 million to resurface the main concourse flooring, and $2 million for replacement of the Scoreboard Jumbotron. The recommended revenue budget is $11,980,867. The stadium is now entering its 10th season of baseball and the suite license agreements will be expiring this year. In keeping with the District’s mission of providing a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility and the strategic goal of generating on-going revenue, the District is budgeting $1 million in capital funds from the Facility Reserves to renovate approximately 12 more of the 69 suites. Renovating these suites will allow new long-term suite license agreements, which in turn will maintain and generate greater revenue to the District. Under the Agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks, the District receives 5% of the suite premiums, which amounts to more than $300,000 per year. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Cactus League by Fiscal Year $6,493,520 $6,500,000 $6,300,000 $6,032,099 $6,024,355 There is an increase in expenditures in the Long Term Project Reserve Fund due to onetime costs included in the FY 2007-08 recommended budget. Revenue $6,000,000 $5,556,717 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 FY 04 Actual FY 05 Actual FY 06 Actual FY 07 Projected Fiscal Year 77 FY 08 Adopted Car rental surcharge revenues have increased and have been more than adequate to cover the debt service payment on the Cactus League bonds. Once the required debt service payment has been made and the District’s operations funded, the remaining revenue will be turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement. Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager On June 18,2007, the Maricopa County Stadium District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2007-08 budget totaling $12,372,353. This represents a $369 increase from the recommended budget of $12,371,984 due to an increase in Risk Management Charges. On August 20, 2007 the Board of Supervisors adopted the tax rates. 78 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Vic Wickersham, Management & Budget Analyst Organizational Chart Stadium District Board of Directors Executive Director David Smith Executive Director Representative William C. Scalzo Cactus League Admin. Ballpark Operations Cactus League Debt Stadium District Construction Stadium District Reserves Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals • The District will provide continuous management oversight and obtain an independent assessment every three calendar years. Status: The Stadium District is following up on items identified for further review in the Facility Assessment that was submitted June 2006. The Stadium District began the first phase of Suite Renovations during the 2nd Quarter. The Suite Renovations project addresses the results of the independent facility assessment by updating the Chase Field suites to the current industry standards for luxury suites. • By September 30, 2007, the District will develop and implement a department wide succession and transfer of knowledge plan both internally and with its business partners. Status: The District has developed a succession plan and is in the process of documenting the plan. Also, the District is in the process of implementing the necessary cross training and making appropriate changes in job duties. • By July 1, 2008, the District will obtain five new entrepreneurial revenue sources to ensure the future stability of the Stadium District. 79 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Status: The District has obtained 9 entrepreneurial revenue sources since July 2003. The Stadium District is currently continuing to develop new entrepreneurial revenue sources for FY 2007-08 to further ensure the future financial stability of the Stadium District. • By June 30, 2011, the District will increase facility revenues to non-baseball activities by 10% ($622,691 currently). Status: The District received $22,221 in non-baseball event revenue during the second quarter of 2007 compared to $15,860 in non-baseball event revenue during the second quarter of 2006. The District is on track to achieve the goal to increase non-baseball revenue by 10%. • By June 30, 2011, the District will increase use of the facility and public exposure to the facility through District and Day Use events for non-baseball activities by 5% (108 current). Status: The District hosted 30 non-baseball events through the second quarter of 2007 compared to 33 hosted non-baseball events through the second quarter of 2006. This slight downturn is not expected to prevent the District from meeting the goal to increase non-baseball events by 5%. 80 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Budget Summary Sources of Funds Sources of Funds (Excluding Fund Balance) $11,980,867 Miscellaneous & Interest 47% Sales Taxes 53% Uses of Funds Administrative Services 2% Uses of Funds $12,372,353 Entertainment Management 2% Financial Management 96% 81 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Total Budget by Program and Activity FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - DAY USE EVENTS FY 2006-07 ADOPTED FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % $ 625,693 625,693 $ 662,500 662,500 $ 662,500 662,500 $ 662,500 662,500 $ 662,500 662,500 $ - 0.0% 0.0% 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 11,873,588 7,481,032 4,392,556 $ 9,987,398 5,833,777 4,153,621 $ 10,837,398 5,833,777 5,003,621 $ 11,542,938 7,093,313 4,449,626 $ 11,266,367 7,185,094 4,081,273 $ 428,969 4.0% 1,351,317 23.2% (922,348) -18.4% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG TOTAL PROGRAMS $ $ 12,499,280 $ $ 10,649,898 $ $ 11,499,898 $ $ 12,205,438 $ $ 52,000 11,980,867 $ $ 52,000 480,969 4.2% EXPENDITURES 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - DAY USE EVENTS $ 58,159 58,159 $ 153,997 153,997 $ 218,280 218,280 $ 187,329 187,329 $ 197,125 197,125 $ 21,155 21,155 9.7% 9.7% 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 13,351,342 8,842,397 4,508,945 $ 8,571,842 6,469,330 2,102,512 $ 10,405,720 6,489,361 3,916,359 $ 10,339,111 6,461,409 3,877,702 $ 11,956,199 6,197,150 5,759,049 $ (1,550,479) -14.9% 292,211 4.5% (1,842,690) -47.1% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG $ 159,592 $ 201,574 $ 143,618 $ 203,883 $ 179,352 $ (35,734) -24.9% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL PROGRAMS $ $ 35,188 13,604,281 $ $ 32,742 8,960,155 $ $ 32,742 10,800,360 $ $ 33,236 10,763,560 $ $ 39,677 12,372,353 $ $ (6,935) -21.2% (1,571,993) -14.6% Total Budget by Category FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE Taxes Intergovernmental Miscellaneous Revenues Total Revenue EXPENDITURES Personal Services Supplies Services Other Financing Uses Capital Outlay Total Expenditures $ $ $ $ 6,498,814 6,000,466 12,499,280 618,935 6,517 1,320,276 35,187 11,623,366 13,604,281 FY 2006-07 ADOPTED $ $ 5,215,094 5,434,804 10,649,898 $ $ 889,113 6,250 1,299,747 6,765,045 8,960,155 FY 2006-07 REVISED $ $ $ $ 5,215,094 6,284,804 11,499,898 989,147 6,250 1,324,713 8,480,250 10,800,360 FY 2006-07 PROJECTED $ $ $ $ 6,032,099 6,173,340 12,205,438 771,645 6,167 1,501,643 1 8,484,103 10,763,560 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % FY 2007-08 ADOPTED $ $ $ $ 6,300,000 52,000 5,628,867 11,980,867 460,688 7,476 2,081,192 9,822,997 12,372,353 $ $ $ $ 1,084,906 52,000 (655,937) 480,969 528,459 (1,226) (756,479) (1,342,747) (1,571,993) 20.8% -10.4% 4.2% 53.4% -19.6% -57.1% -15.8% -14.6% Total Budget by Fund FY 2005-06 ACTUAL REVENUE 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 ELIMINATIONS TOTAL FUNDS EXPENDITURES 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 ELIMINATIONS TOTAL FUNDS $ $ $ $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2006-07 PROJECTED 1,294,143 $ 4,325,147 7,018,590 4,346,779 (4,485,379) 12,499,280 $ 507,500 $ 4,616,121 5,515,094 2,054,076 (2,042,893) 10,649,898 $ 507,500 $ 4,716,121 5,515,094 2,804,076 (2,042,893) 11,499,898 $ 950,261 4,293,168 6,442,132 2,586,684 (2,066,807) 12,205,438 1,122,911 $ 6,444,607 6,641,569 3,880,572 (4,485,379) 13,604,281 $ 482,288 $ 3,592,666 5,925,094 1,003,000 (2,042,893) 8,960,155 $ 482,288 $ 3,717,666 5,925,094 2,718,205 (2,042,893) 10,800,360 $ 821,875 2,886,664 6,287,374 2,834,455 (2,066,807) 10,763,560 82 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED $ $ $ $ REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % 507,500 $ 4,630,773 6,775,094 2,054,076 (1,986,576) 11,980,867 $ (85,348) 1,260,000 (750,000) 56,317 480,969 0.0% -1.8% 22.8% -26.7% -2.8% 4.2% 482,288 $ 3,748,547 5,925,094 4,203,000 (1,986,576) 12,372,353 $ (30,881) (1,484,795) (56,317) (1,571,993) 0.0% -0.8% 0.0% -54.6% 2.8% -14.6% Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Personnel by Fund FY 2006-07 REVISED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE % FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - DAY USE EVENTS 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 (0.10) (0.10) -12.5% -12.5% 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT 1.95 1.55 0.10 0.10 0.50 1.15 2.90 0.60 0.20 0.10 0.50 2.15 0.95 (0.95) 0.10 1.00 48.7% -61.3% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 87.0% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROG TOTAL PROGRAMS 2.25 5.00 1.40 5.00 (0.85) - -37.8% 0.0% Mandated vs. Non-Mandated Expenditures $14,000 Thousand $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $FY 2005-06 ACTUAL FY 2006-07 PROJECTED FY 2007-08 ADOPTED MANDATED NON-MANDATED 83 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Programs and Activities Entertainment Management Program The purpose of the Entertainment Management Program is to provide entertainment event services to the Maricopa County community and visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Program Results Percentage of Change in District Event Revenue Compared to Prior Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT RECOMM (Rev. - Rec.) % 0.0% -5.0% -5.0% -5.0% 1.0% 6.0% -120.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Events Events Activity The purpose of the Events Activity is to provide entertainment services to the Maricopa County community and its visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Performance Analysis: Demand Dollar event revenue to be generated Output Dollar event revenue generated Percent of Demand met Efficiency Expenditures per unit of Output Revenues by Fund Ballpark Operations Long Term Project Reserve Eliminations Totals Expenditures by Fund Ballpark Operations Eliminations Totals Staffing (FTEs) FY 2005-06 ACTUAL 3,939,552 ADOPTED 3,726,940 FY 2006-07 REVISED 3,726,940 PROJ ACT 3,726,940 FY 2007-08 RECOMM 3,780,878 Variance (Rev. - Rec.) 53,938 % 1.4% 3,939,552 3,726,940 3,726,940 3,726,940 3,780,878 53,938 1.4% $ $ $ $ $ 100.0% 0.01 $ 100.0% 0.04 $ 100.0% 0.06 $ 100.0% 0.05 $ 625,693 $ 73,601 (73,601) 625,693 $ 662,500 $ 50,000 (50,000) 662,500 $ 662,500 $ 50,000 (50,000) 662,500 $ 662,500 662,500 131,760 $ (73,601) 58,159 $ - 203,997 $ (50,000) 153,997 $ - 268,280 $ (50,000) 218,280 $ 0.80 187,329 187,329 - $ $ $ $ 100.0% 0.05 $ 0.0% 0.01 662,500 $ 50,000 (50,000) 662,500 $ - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 247,125 $ (50,000) 197,125 $ 0.70 21,155 21,155 (0.10) Events Activity Performance $ Revenue Generated $3,500,000 $0.05 $3,000,000 $0.04 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $0.03 $1,500,000 $0.02 $1,000,000 $0.01 $500,000 $0 $0.00 Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED Output 84 FY 2007-08 RECOMMENDED Cost per Revenue $ Generated Cost/Revenue $ Generated $0.06 $4,000,000 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL 0.0% 11.0% 7.9% 0.0% 9.7% -12.5% Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District The lower unit cost in FY 2005-06 is due to it being the first year of the Day Use Program and it did not reflect a full year cost. The FY 2007-08 unit costs have increased slightly when compared to FY 2006-07 due to salary and benefit increases. The overall budget decreased in the amount of $21,155 due to .10 FTE being reallocated to another activity. Financial Management Program The purpose of the Financial Management Program is to provide fiscal resources and asset management of Cactus League Facilities and Chase Field for the Board of Directors of the Stadium District, the community, and for its visitors, in order to ensure sound fiscal management of publicly owned facilities. Program Results FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Variance ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROJ ACT RECOMM (Rev. - Rec.) % 11.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -3.0% -1.0% 50.0% Percentage Change in Revenue Generated 89.0% Percentage of Satisfied Customers 95.0% 95.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Fiscal Resource 95.0% • 96.0% 1.0% 1.1% Physical Asset Management Fiscal Resource Activity The purpose of the Fiscal Resource Activity is to provide financial management services for the Stadium District Board of Directors so that they can make sound financial decisions. Performance Analysis: Demand Dollar revenue to be generated Output Dollars generated in revenue Percent of Demand met Efficiency Expenditures per unit of Output Revenues by Fund Cactus League Operations Ballpark Operations Stadium Dist Debt Series02 Long Term Project Reserve Eliminations Totals Expenditures by Fund Cactus League Operations Ballpark Operations Stadium Dist Debt Series02 Long Term Project Reserve Eliminations Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ $ $ $ $ FY 2005-06 ACTUAL 12,473,471 ADOPTED 12,231,988 FY 2006-07 REVISED 12,231,988 PROJ ACT 12,231,988 FY 2007-08 RECOMM 11,839,259 Variance (Rev. - Rec.) (392,729) % -3.2% 12,473,471 12,231,988 12,231,988 12,231,988 11,839,259 (392,729) -3.2% 100.0% 0.71 $ 100.0% 0.53 $ 100.0% 0.53 $ 100.0% 0.60 $ 100.0% 0.52 $ 0.0% 0.01 0.0% 1.3% 1,294,143 $ 171,352 7,018,590 3,408,725 (4,411,778) 7,481,032 $ 507,500 $ 50,000 5,515,094 1,257,411 (1,496,228) 5,833,777 $ 507,500 $ 50,000 5,515,094 1,257,411 (1,496,228) 5,833,777 $ 950,261 $ 110,338 6,442,132 1,607,388 (1,040,690) 8,069,429 $ 507,500 $ 85,000 6,775,094 300,000 (482,500) 7,185,094 $ 35,000 1,260,000 (957,411) 1,013,728 1,351,317 0.0% 70.0% 22.8% -76.1% -67.8% 23.2% 1,120,504 $ 5,492,102 6,641,569 (4,411,778) 8,842,397 $ - 480,011 $ 1,557,453 5,925,094 3,000 (1,496,228) 6,469,330 $ - 480,011 $ 1,577,484 5,925,094 3,000 (1,496,228) 6,489,361 $ 0.80 819,822 $ 1,421,020 6,177,374 (1,040,690) 7,377,526 $ - 478,800 $ 1,211 272,780 1,304,704 5,925,094 3,000 (482,500) (1,013,728) 6,197,174 $ 292,187 0.75 (0.05) 0.3% 82.7% 0.0% 0.0% 67.8% 4.5% -6.3% 85 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District $13,000,000 $0.80 $12,000,000 $0.70 $11,000,000 $0.60 $10,000,000 $0.50 $9,000,000 $0.40 $8,000,000 $0.30 $7,000,000 $0.20 $6,000,000 $0.10 $5,000,000 Cost/ $ Reveenue Generated $ Revenue Generated Fiscal Resource Activity Performance $0.00 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED Output FY 2007-08 RECOMMENDED Cost per $ Revenue Generated The FY 2007-08 recommended revenue budget reflects a decrease compared to the FY 200607 projected budget due to a one-time receipt of revenue in the amount of $679,000. During FY 2006-07, the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team contributed 50% funding for a new sound system. The FY 2007-08 recommended expenditure budget reflects a unit cost reduction from $0.60 in FY 2006-07 to $0.52 due to a one-time expense in the amount $243,000 for a weatherproofing contract. Physical Asset Management Activity The purpose of the Physical Asset Management Activity is to provide oversight of Chase Field maintenance and use agreements for the users to Chase Field so that they can enjoy a safe and well maintained facility and be protected from future capital repair expenditures to Chase Field by increasing capital reserves. Performance Analysis: Demand Total dollars deposited into reserves Output Dollars generated in reserves Percent of Demand met Efficiency Expenditures per unit of Output Revenues by Fund Cactus League Operations Ballpark Operations Long Term Project Reserve Eliminations Totals Expenditures by Fund Cactus League Operations Ballpark Operations Long Term Project Reserve Eliminations Totals Staffing (FTEs) $ $ $ $ $ FY 2005-06 ACTUAL 4,355,210 ADOPTED 2,534,311 FY 2006-07 REVISED 2,534,311 PROJ ACT 2,534,311 FY 2007-08 RECOMM 2,054,076 Variance (Rev. - Rec.) (480,235) % -18.9% 4,355,210 2,534,311 2,534,311 2,534,311 2,054,076 100.0% 1.04 $ 3,528,102 864,454 4,392,556 317 628,056 3,880,572 4,508,945 - $ $ $ $ 100.0% 0.83 $ 100.0% 1.55 $ - $ 3,903,621 746,665 (496,665) 4,153,621 $ - $ 4,003,621 1,496,665 (496,665) 5,003,621 $ 3,520,331 929,295 4,449,626 $ 1,599,177 1,000,000 (496,665) 2,102,512 $ - $ 1,697,819 2,715,205 (496,665) 3,916,359 $ 1.15 1,043,248 2,834,455 3,877,702 - 86 100.0% 1.53 $ $ $ $ $ (480,235) -18.9% 100.0% 2.80 $ 0.0% (1.26) 0.0% -81.4% - $ 3,831,273 1,704,076 (1,454,076) 4,081,273 $ (172,348) 207,411 (957,411) (922,348) -4.3% 13.9% 192.8% -18.4% $ 3,013,125 (1,315,306) 4,200,000 (1,484,795) (1,454,076) 957,411 5,759,049 $ (1,842,690) 2.15 1.00 -77.5% -54.7% -192.8% -47.1% 87.0% Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 Cost/$ Deposited into Reserves Total $ Deposited into Reserves Physical Asset Management Activity Performance $0.00 FY 2005-06 ACTUAL Demand FY 2006-07 PROJECTED Output FY 2007-08 RECOMMENDED Cost per $ Deposited into Reserves The unit costs for FY 2007-08 recommended budget for the Physical Asset Management Activity shows an increase from $1.53 in FY 2006-07 to $2.80. This unit cost increase is due to one-time capital improvements in the amount of $4,200,000 that will occur in FY 2007-08. These projects are continued renovations of 12 more suites ($1,000,000), resurfacing the main concourse flooring ($1,200,000) and the replacement of the Jumbotron Scoreboard ($2,000,000). The FY 2007-08 recommended budget for the Long Term Project Reserve Fund requires the use of fund balance for these one-time expenditures in the amount of $2,148,924. The high demand and output shown for FY 2005-06 is due to $2 million in transfers into the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) for capital repairs. This transfer will not occur in FY 2007 or FY 2008. 87 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Stadium District has authority to levy a surcharge on rental cars to help fund Cactus League stadium construction in Maricopa County. In addition, in FY 1994-95, Legislation allowed the Stadium District to collect a special 0.25% sales tax for construction of Chase Field. In connection with the authority, the Stadium District committed to provide up to $253,000,000 for the cost of the new stadium. The $253,000,000 was funded through the use of $238,000,000 of the special sales tax levy. Under the Facility Development Agreement for the major league baseball stadium, the Stadium District was obligated to obtain a loan in an amount not to exceed $15 million to pay for part of the Stadium District’s portion of construction costs. Fiscal Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Special Sales Tax Stadium District Stadium District Major League Car Rental Baseball Surcharge $ 5,326,147 $ 96,058,302 5,443,369 35,997,339 5,400,000 NA 5,722,238 NA 5,637,184 NA 5,536,163 NA 4,865,038 NA 5,556,717 NA 6,024,416 NA 6,498,814 NA * 6,032,099 NA ** 6,300,000 NA Total $ 101,384,449 41,440,708 5,400,000 5,722,238 5,637,184 5,536,163 4,865,038 5,556,717 6,024,416 6,498,814 6,032,099 6,300,000 * Projected Actual ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include payments made under the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization, naming rights fees, facility use charges and interest earnings. The chart at the right illustrates the miscellaneous revenues from FY 200102 through the FY 2007-08 Budget. Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 * ** Miscellaneous Revenue $ 4,953,957 5,071,762 4,916,724 5,276,945 6,000,467 6,173,340 5,680,867 * Projected Actual ** Budget 88 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District fund to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. A portion of the car rental surcharge revenue from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) is transferred to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) to support Cactus League operations. Under the statute, the District may set the surcharge at $2.50 on each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire, for less than one year, and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by statute, in January 1993. Additionally, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) along with amounts associated with loan repayments. These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds will be utilized to maintain and improve the facility. Fund Transfers $4,485,379 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,066,807 $1,986,576 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,813,912 $1,372,050 $1,500,000 $1,003,599 $1,000,000 $500,000 $2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 89 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2007-08. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. The Stadium District has no fund balance designations at this time. The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for FY 2007-08 begins with audited actual fund balance information at the end of FY 2005-06, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The “unreserved fund balance” is used. Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Unreserved/ Undesignated Beginning Fund Balance SPECIAL REVENUE 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS SPECIAL REVENUE TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 DEBT SERVICE TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL TOTAL FUNDS $ Revenue & Transfers In $ $ 2,822,269 4,193,691 7,015,960 $ $ Expenditures & Transfers Out $ $ 507,500 4,630,773 5,138,273 154,758 154,758 $ $ $ $ 9,567,370 9,567,370 $ 16,738,088 Operating Expenditures $ $ 482,288 3,748,547 4,230,835 6,775,094 6,775,094 $ $ $ $ 2,054,076 2,054,076 $ 13,967,443 Unreserved/ Undesignated Ending Fund Balance $ $ 482,288 3,748,547 4,230,835 $ 2,847,481 5,075,917 7,923,398 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 1,004,758 1,004,758 $ $ 4,203,000 4,203,000 $ $ 4,203,000 4,203,000 $ $ 7,418,446 7,418,446 $ 14,358,929 $ 14,358,929 $ 16,346,602 EXPENDITURES $ 482,288 $ REVENUE 507,500 Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Reconciliation Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: $ 482,288 $ 507,500 FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: $ 482,288 $ 507,500 FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ 482,288 $ 507,500 90 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 3,592,666 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Parking lease with Regents IGA with Sheriff - Security $ FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Employee Health/Dental Plan Changes (12 months) Retirement Contributions FY 2007-08 Pay for Performance Annualization of Compensation Adjustments Annualization of Mid-Year Adjustments One-Time Revenue Central Service Cost Allocation Subtotal $ 25,000 100,000 125,000 $ 100,000 100,000 $ 3,717,666 $ 4,716,121 $ 3,717,666 $ 4,716,121 3,418 $ 1,464 12,016 2,963 98,000 (792) 117,069 $ 98,000 54,000 152,000 $ Subtotal $ $ REVENUE 4,616,121 FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: $ 3,834,735 $ Revenue Submission (Under) Target BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue from Parks - Mngmt Analyst Mngmt Analyst move to Parks & Rec Charge from Parks - Mngmt Analyst $ - $ (189,551) - $ (98,670) 12,482 (86,188) $ (47,797) (237,348) $ Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ 91 3,748,547 $ 4,868,121 4,630,773 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series Fund (370) Budget Reconciliation EXPENDITURES $ 5,925,094 $ FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: Structural Balance FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue Submission Over Target FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: REVENUE 5,515,094 $ 5,925,094 $ 5,515,094 $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 410,000 410,000 $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 850,000 850,000 $ 5,925,094 $ 6,775,094 EXPENDITURES $ 1,003,000 $ REVENUE 2,054,076 Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Appropriated Budget Reconciliation FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Sound System Weatherproofing contract $ Subtotal $ 1,472,120 243,085 1,715,205 $ 2,718,205 $ nonono $ 2,804,076 FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: $ 2,718,205 $ TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: One Time Expenses Diamondbacks Sound System $ FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET: BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Suite Renovation Resurface Main Concourse flooring Scoreboard Replacement FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ (2,715,205) $ (2,715,205) $ - 2,804,076 (750,000) (750,000) $ 3,000 $ 2,054,076 $ $ Subtotal $ 1,000,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 4,200,000 $ - $ 4,203,000 $ 2,054,076 Expenditures Decrease in Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) is due to one-time costs included in the FY 200708 budget. These costs include the continuation of the suite renovation project, replacement of the Scoreboard Jumbotron and the resurfacing of the main concourse flooring. 92 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) Budget Reconciliation FY 2006-07 ADOPTED BUDGET: EXPENDITURES $ (2,042,893) $ FY 2006-07 REVISED BUDGET: $ (2,042,893) $ (2,042,893) FY 2006-07 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET: $ (2,042,893) $ (2,042,893) FY 2007-08 BUDGET TARGET $ (2,042,893) $ (2,042,893) BASE ADJUSTMENTS: Revenue/Expenditure Under Target $ Subtotal $ FY 2007-08 ADOPTED BUDGET: $ 93 56,317 56,317 $ $ (1,986,576) $ REVENUE (2,042,893) 56,317 56,317 (1,986,576) Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as, categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt (2) Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2006 Year Ending June 30 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds $58,225,000 $57,225,000 $55,225,000 $52,735,000 $50,050,000 Stadium District contractual obligations 0 7,888,888 6,428,888 4,428,888 2,428,888 Stadium Debt with governmental commitment 0 0 0 0 0 $58,225,000 $65,113,888 $61,653,888 $57,163,888 $52,478,888 Total Governmental activities 94 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2006 Year Ending June 30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 – 16 2017 – 19 Total Principal 2,820,000 2,960,000 3,105,000 3,260,000 3,390,000 19,855,000 14,660,000 $ 50,050,000 $ $ $ Interest 2,603,345 2,462,344 2,314,344 2,159,094 2,028,694 7,247,756 1,603,363 20,418,940 Total Debt Service $ 5,423,345 5,422,344 5,419,344 5,419,094 5,418,694 27,102,756 16,263,363 $ 70,468,940 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING BY ISSUE As of June 30, 2006 Bond Issue Total Stadium District Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 95 Amount $ 50,050,000 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Interest Principal $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 FY 07 FY -08 08 FY -09 09 FY -10 10 FY -11 11 FY -12 12 FY -13 13 FY -14 14 FY -15 15 FY -16 16 FY -17 17 FY -18 18 FY -19 19 -2 0 $0 Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for Maricopa County. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of County – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the County, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. 96 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District Examples of the rating systems are: BOND RATINGS RATING AGENCIES Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings Premium quality Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s AAA Aaa AAA AA Aa AA A A A BBB Baa BBB BB Ba BB B B B CCC Caa CCC CC Ca CC C C C High quality Medium quality Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest In default, in arrears DDD DDD DD DD D D Questionable value Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Date Date Date Rating Rating Standard & Rating Assigned Moody's Assigned Poor's Assigned Aaa (1) AAA (1) (1) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating. Stadium District Contractual Commitments On February 17, 1994, the Stadium District entered into an agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) to provide for the financing of a portion of the costs of acquisitions and construction of a new major league baseball stadium. The Arizona Diamondbacks agreed to include the Stadium District loan in its financing in order to allow the Stadium District to obtain more favorable financing terms, and the Stadium District agreed to repay the Team for this increase in the Team’s borrowing. At June 30, 2006, the Stadium District had contractual commitments outstanding of $2,428,888 with a fixed interest rate of 7.15%. 97 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Contractual Commitments Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2006 Year Ending June 30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 – 16 Total Principal $ $ $ 2,428,888 2,428,888 $ 98 Interest 173,762 173,762 173,762 173,762 173,762 471,366 1,340,176 $ $ Total Debt Service 173,762 173,762 173,762 173,762 173,762 2,900,254 3,769,064 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Stadium District 99 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Special Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts account for debt service on special assessment bonds. Funding is provided by special assessments made against the benefiting property owners. DIST. NO. 28531 28548 28532 28795 28529 28793 28835 DISTRICT NAME LEVY PURPOSE Queen Creek Water Improv Bond Interest Bond redemption ESTIMATED 2006-07 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 2006-07 2,296 2,296 5,471 5,471 7,767 7,767 2007-08 LESS 2007-08 BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT 1,480 1,480 3,076 3,076 4,556 4,556 Central Ave Bond Interest Bond redemption 2,626 6,631 9,257 2,626 6,631 9,257 1,911 4,916 6,826 - 1,911 4,916 6,826 Billings Street Bond Interest Bond redemption 115 455 570 115 455 570 47 1,049 1,096 - 47 1,049 1,096 Marquerite Drive Bond Interest Bond redemption 2,088 357 2,445 2,088 357 2,445 931 4,283 5,214 - 931 4,283 5,214 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest Bond redemption 3,604 6,006 9,610 3,604 6,006 9,610 2,829 6,006 8,835 - 2,829 6,006 8,835 14th Street 192nd Ave. Avenida del Sol Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street 31st Avenue General General General General General General General General Subtotal 455 740 265 13,800 75,000 10,900 10,146 0 111,306 455 740 265 13,800 75,000 10,900 10,146 0 111,306 0 740 265 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,675 34,866 171,546 - 0 740 265 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,675 34,866 171,546 Total $140,955 $140,955 - $198,073 100 $198,073 $ Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies This Street Lighting Improvement District provides for lighting in unincorporated areas of Maricopa County. Operations are funded by special assessment as listed below. 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET 2,385 2,685 8,721 1,102 19,266 9,611 783 17,128 2,473 4,351 5,754 5,045 215 977 4,013 5,242 2,154 9,614 3,489 3,618 6,331 3,571 4,391 646 632 7,763 1,478 11,377 849 5,370 849 7,912 6,451 10,204 13,782 1,448 1,911 10,097 2,523 2,733 8,812 1,086 19,403 9,708 794 17,538 2,493 4,391 5,816 5,108 217 984 3,823 5,283 2,173 9,703 3,514 3,672 6,643 3,596 4,421 652 639 7,815 1,545 11,454 855 5,414 855 7,965 6,494 10,278 13,906 1,458 1,923 10,252 101 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2007 2007 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 600 1,252,517 0.0479 2,160 1,809,380 0.1194 10,339 2,686,350 0.3849 1,369 373,850 0.3662 24,159 12,493,851 0.1934 11,997 3,014,500 0.3980 850 525,300 0.1618 22,028 3,999,501 0.5508 2,632 1,180,167 0.2230 4,909 1,453,476 0.3377 6,078 1,220,823 0.4979 6,060 2,858,200 0.2120 234 6,272,768 0.0037 1,144 862,540 0.1326 4,668 2,467,439 0.1892 6,590 2,658,627 0.2479 2,154 510,269 0.4221 10,185 2,203,163 0.4623 3,723 1,588,400 0.2344 4,198 1,309,000 0.3207 7,975 2,052,195 0.3886 4,472 941,317 0.4751 4,728 5,370,294 0.0880 674 1,012,337 0.0666 845 343,050 0.2463 8,386 5,107,422 0.1642 1,650 312,349 0.5283 12,213 8,095,585 0.1509 819 498,017 0.1645 5,693 3,406,000 0.1671 1,157 296,400 0.3904 8,289 4,299,249 0.1928 7,347 3,552,401 0.2068 11,180 5,154,835 0.2169 15,262 6,263,829 0.2437 1,526 1,565,150 0.0975 1,937 297,809 0.6504 12,613 2,653,052 0.4754 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13248 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 3,247 23,166 2,002 3,414 3,745 21,776 1,077 1,253 6,103 3,461 718,585 11,177 2,158 2,595 182 2,867 17,429 2,263 5,113 4,035 13,654 9,191 2,584 1,952 2,791 1,699 20,118 2,639 20,638 21,596 2,584 4,307 2,682 2,622 6,371 12,421 10,209 16,090 7,113 4,389 13,744 12,912 3,259 23,914 2,018 3,443 3,773 22,440 1,086 1,266 6,143 3,525 731,915 11,254 2,173 2,486 186 2,824 17,713 2,282 5,189 4,060 13,893 9,380 2,607 1,969 2,847 1,710 20,323 2,672 21,073 22,098 2,607 4,344 2,722 2,557 6,411 12,517 10,281 16,329 7,169 4,497 13,924 13,000 102 Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 3,411 28,175 2,263 3,546 4,524 26,472 1,352 1,536 6,765 3,929 817,596 11,988 2,476 3,107 120 2,814 19,973 2,540 6,021 4,794 16,841 11,805 3,184 2,080 3,148 2,143 24,185 2,664 22,983 26,214 2,770 4,669 3,055 2,527 6,791 13,196 11,018 19,154 8,897 4,504 15,631 14,478 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 882,118 6,262,953 808,400 1,036,858 1,373,968 5,751,622 390,050 423,950 3,809,863 692,892 290,283,293 5,209,950 709,317 953,990 538,448 890,023 4,116,618 529,917 1,397,572 1,004,067 3,682,402 2,821,208 1,047,850 392,651 2,022,797 793,950 4,890,591 473,834 4,240,235 5,742,013 735,078 831,724 476,550 833,017 3,759,936 3,410,570 4,519,046 5,258,856 1,969,491 490,204 3,659,484 4,058,900 0.3867 0.4499 0.2799 0.3420 0.3293 0.4603 0.3466 0.3623 0.1776 0.5670 0.2817 0.2301 0.3491 0.3257 0.0223 0.3162 0.4852 0.4793 0.4308 0.4775 0.4573 0.4184 0.3039 0.5297 0.1556 0.2699 0.4945 0.5622 0.5420 0.4565 0.3768 0.5614 0.6411 0.3034 0.1806 0.3869 0.2438 0.3642 0.4517 0.9188 0.4271 0.3567 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 8,628 123,570 4,336 10,218 30,706 18,861 19,537 2,131 4,376 22,157 3,185 8,977 3,168 3,185 27,150 4,035 2,300 1,103 1,532 3,819 3,556 6,280 6,561 893 3,656 18,165 17,410 5,719 1,744 15,407 4,307 1,162 6,486 1,838 11,287 3,475 3,226 2,829 8,576 1,683 7,124 10,231 3,150 8,745 125,904 4,393 10,434 31,023 19,059 19,529 2,154 4,433 22,429 3,206 9,189 3,191 3,206 27,377 4,060 2,422 1,069 1,496 3,861 3,636 6,333 6,606 900 3,733 18,796 17,666 5,802 1,710 15,048 4,344 1,086 6,541 1,738 11,098 3,383 3,268 2,858 8,802 1,724 7,189 10,311 3,176 103 Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 10,533 127,678 4,861 11,789 35,284 21,471 24,186 2,497 4,853 24,597 3,650 10,501 3,797 3,515 30,472 4,247 2,865 1,166 1,582 4,561 4,282 6,570 6,964 1,041 3,937 20,962 19,429 7,289 1,913 15,264 4,760 1,048 7,833 2,099 11,545 3,677 3,932 3,067 9,154 1,846 8,713 10,662 3,957 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 2,935,834 51,863,506 1,872,950 2,950,310 10,740,179 6,175,601 5,438,086 673,550 1,354,195 5,787,409 2,612,300 3,796,223 1,087,990 297,071 7,241,515 548,665 1,190,802 425,350 318,867 1,041,817 1,230,218 1,792,223 1,667,401 312,450 1,264,667 5,620,458 4,954,097 4,776,945 538,567 4,822,102 2,592,084 319,084 1,684,451 465,600 3,295,323 1,021,934 1,038,637 1,380,016 1,149,928 411,999 3,033,992 2,427,967 1,064,400 0.3588 0.2462 0.2595 0.3996 0.3285 0.3477 0.4448 0.3707 0.3584 0.4250 0.1397 0.2766 0.3490 1.1832 0.4208 0.7741 0.2406 0.2741 0.4961 0.4378 0.3481 0.3666 0.4177 0.3332 0.3113 0.3730 0.3922 0.1526 0.3552 0.3165 0.1836 0.3284 0.4650 0.4508 0.3503 0.3598 0.3786 0.2222 0.7960 0.4481 0.2872 0.4391 0.3718 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 18,275 24,984 9,973 5,791 1,699 4,522 15,860 8,846 19,443 2,869 3,675 4,863 1,910 6,054 13,818 2,113 5,548 6,615 1,694 7,501 3,533 11,616 1,690 1,897 4,027 3,816 10,623 2,812 5,498 11,650 11,831 7,673 4,890 9,740 2,080 5,484 2,251 7,119 1,297 2,121 6,356 2,670 1,645 18,767 25,346 10,159 5,888 1,710 4,562 16,047 9,013 19,681 2,905 3,708 4,909 1,927 6,114 13,947 2,133 5,601 6,677 1,710 7,569 3,472 11,404 1,706 1,912 4,063 3,850 10,724 2,793 5,561 11,756 11,937 7,746 4,932 9,829 2,100 5,461 2,271 7,217 1,310 2,140 6,413 2,695 1,652 104 Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 23,818 28,675 13,025 6,446 1,997 5,657 18,982 10,311 22,227 3,567 4,332 5,822 2,217 7,293 16,414 2,552 6,455 7,764 1,995 8,968 4,192 12,930 2,077 2,150 4,779 4,467 12,393 2,785 6,593 14,014 13,894 9,378 5,506 11,486 2,434 6,086 2,614 9,022 1,545 2,544 7,538 2,907 1,880 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 5,491,849 6,407,742 4,491,771 3,119,921 502,000 1,902,551 3,658,521 2,013,830 4,637,609 651,368 2,157,391 2,818,153 1,473,900 2,992,917 7,248,985 1,338,150 3,279,184 3,464,734 2,366,180 5,353,200 1,090,150 7,425,878 1,155,174 499,567 2,898,750 2,428,083 5,339,234 1,957,687 1,708,584 6,608,262 6,984,889 5,006,933 2,524,751 6,744,538 755,857 1,437,369 1,331,734 3,492,357 895,800 1,489,950 3,144,463 1,613,922 503,441 0.4337 0.4475 0.2900 0.2066 0.3978 0.2973 0.5188 0.5120 0.4793 0.5476 0.2008 0.2066 0.1504 0.2437 0.2264 0.1907 0.1968 0.2241 0.0843 0.1675 0.3845 0.1741 0.1798 0.4304 0.1649 0.1840 0.2321 0.1423 0.3859 0.2121 0.1989 0.1873 0.2181 0.1703 0.3220 0.4234 0.1963 0.2583 0.1725 0.1707 0.2397 0.1801 0.3734 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 2,388 28,305 17,059 11,853 7,819 6,618 5,818 1,906 1,272 4,657 6,226 1,690 1,294 11,867 4,408 1,948 2,193 28,327 12,243 7,046 4,781 2,761 23,290 21,107 10,450 10,053 12,087 9,354 2,147 6,767 39,805 29,617 3,584 3,823 275,123 4,101 6,133 4,933 30,628 2,476 7,607 33,999 2,396 28,557 17,216 11,962 7,917 6,679 5,856 1,923 1,283 4,789 6,168 1,706 1,282 12,003 4,361 1,923 2,133 30,022 13,416 6,839 4,696 2,741 25,213 22,184 10,747 10,212 12,295 9,478 2,137 6,614 40,763 30,496 3,641 3,898 281,304 4,097 6,146 5,026 31,176 2,515 7,801 35,206 105 Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 2,602 33,464 20,210 14,107 8,921 7,899 6,822 2,267 1,597 5,602 6,747 2,112 1,380 13,882 4,685 2,038 2,200 29,212 13,675 7,376 5,005 3,084 25,275 22,747 11,378 11,527 13,773 11,194 2,187 7,292 47,203 35,589 4,114 3,733 339,521 4,079 6,337 5,756 34,499 2,482 8,668 37,723 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 717,150 16,276,885 9,736,434 13,840,741 3,643,692 3,978,200 3,764,171 1,122,970 752,200 3,112,817 1,621,142 820,300 345,614 5,492,467 1,495,175 432,784 859,354 7,985,707 4,603,983 2,033,410 1,576,003 485,950 7,068,132 5,654,890 3,257,663 2,866,763 3,590,090 2,461,988 657,368 1,955,819 9,644,574 7,014,064 1,843,515 857,632 47,794,781 566,832 1,805,984 1,731,088 8,000,876 645,950 2,449,402 8,974,336 0.3628 0.2056 0.2076 0.1019 0.2448 0.1986 0.1812 0.2019 0.2123 0.1800 0.4162 0.2575 0.3993 0.2527 0.3133 0.4709 0.2560 0.3658 0.2970 0.3627 0.3176 0.6346 0.3576 0.4023 0.3493 0.4021 0.3836 0.4547 0.3327 0.3728 0.4894 0.5074 0.2232 0.4353 0.7104 0.7196 0.3509 0.3325 0.4312 0.3842 0.3539 0.4203 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 RUSSELL RANCH PH 1 8,943 19,369 30,689 7,417 10,463 11,272 27,571 2,907 3,895 5,453 8,489 36,175 19,104 9,526 36,812 18,854 9,337 14,402 6,875 2,988 7,590 17,746 15,260 13,864 3,397 7,154 3,175 14,530 9,567 4,995 2,573 12,361 1,872 7,651 466,281 1,118 5,293 71,437 36,630 1,486 11,082 16,957 3,160 8,943 19,888 31,582 7,424 10,760 11,445 28,078 2,835 3,836 5,541 8,602 36,948 19,573 9,635 37,187 19,238 8,903 14,293 6,513 2,824 7,765 17,966 15,594 14,209 3,419 7,425 3,288 14,818 9,396 5,043 2,616 12,597 1,902 7,732 494,031 1,137 5,552 72,804 38,208 1,496 11,582 17,663 3,270 106 Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 9,419 24,863 35,980 7,563 11,443 14,577 30,651 2,656 3,991 6,872 10,737 39,997 23,145 10,625 41,859 23,576 8,926 17,290 6,232 2,691 9,010 20,505 17,912 16,313 4,040 9,409 4,053 16,677 9,821 4,105 3,135 15,871 2,198 9,800 745,146 1,318 7,053 73,835 48,928 1,610 14,452 21,964 4,432 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 2,651,686 4,038,160 7,675,306 2,067,675 1,982,435 4,677,381 5,390,466 550,032 780,367 914,331 3,894,583 10,356,598 5,391,003 2,933,218 9,210,580 10,975,370 2,809,899 4,986,553 3,000,474 1,020,174 3,332,182 5,918,073 3,361,140 3,748,819 2,347,290 3,948,525 1,253,084 3,649,969 3,047,354 2,750,371 2,183,600 4,936,550 2,246,250 1,642,400 99,138,648 798,240 5,134,347 28,005,777 27,127,167 1,116,812 7,989,387 14,888,038 5,110,940 0.3552 0.6157 0.4688 0.3658 0.5772 0.3116 0.5686 0.4829 0.5114 0.7516 0.2757 0.3862 0.4293 0.3622 0.4545 0.2148 0.3177 0.3467 0.2077 0.2638 0.2704 0.3465 0.5329 0.4352 0.1721 0.2383 0.3234 0.4569 0.3223 0.1493 0.1436 0.3215 0.0979 0.5967 0.7516 0.1651 0.1374 0.2636 0.1804 0.1442 0.1809 0.1475 0.0867 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2006-07 BUDGET DIST # 23399 23452 23502 23568 23572 23579 23580 13435 23104 Estimated 2007-08 BUDGET DESCRIPTION Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vista Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 Litchfield Vista Views Estimated DIRECT TAX LEVY 38,906 956 0 0 0 0 0 40,646 1,000 3,954 7,526 42,671 21,840 8,362 49,447 1,139 3,954 7,526 42,671 21,840 8,362 3,742,906 3,912,439 4,603,545 2,093 1,668 2,287 1,836 107 2,315 2,070 TAX YEAR Estimated 2007 2007 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUATION RATE 29,477,696 3,483,020 1,433,800 3,162,490 17,805,971 14,571,710 5,584,736 2007 SQUARE FOOTAGE 314,226 1,351,641 0.1677 0.0327 0.2758 0.2380 0.2396 0.1499 0.1497 0.8488 0.1531 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Flood Control District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Property Taxes: The budget will advance the goal of reducing property tax rates by continuing the self-imposed limits on the District property tax levy and by controlling expenditure increases. • In order to protect taxpayers from tax increases resulting from high valuation increases, the FY 2007-08 Flood Control District secondary tax levy on properties taxed in FY 2006-07 will increase by no more than 2%, which is equivalent to limits on primary property taxes. • The targeted overall increase in operating expenditures should be less than the combined rate of increase in population and inflation (as measured by the GDP Price Deflator), currently estimated at 7.0% for FY 2007-08. To achieve this target, the Office of Management and Budget is directed to identify possible savings by working with District staff and advisory boards and recommend corresponding changes to the budget. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. 108 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized cost of FY 2006-07 approved Results Initiatives. 2. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 3. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 4. Items required by State law. 5. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 6. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. 109 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Library District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Property Taxes: The budget will advance the goal of reducing property tax rates by continuing the self-imposed limits on the District property tax levy and by controlling expenditure increases. • In order to protect taxpayers from tax increases resulting from high valuation increases, the FY 2007-08 Flood Control District secondary tax levy on properties taxed in FY 2006-07 will increase by no more than 2%, which is equivalent to limits on primary property taxes. • The targeted overall increase in operating expenditures should be less than the combined rate of increase in population and inflation (as measured by the GDP Price Deflator), currently estimated at 7.0% for FY 2007-08. To achieve this target, the Office of Management and Budget is directed to identify possible savings by working with District staff and advisory boards and recommend corresponding changes to the budget. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized cost of FY 2006-07 approved Results Initiatives. 2. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 3. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 4. Items required by State law. 110 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments 5. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 6. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. 111 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Budgeting for Results Guidelines and Priorities – Stadium District (Approved by the Board of Directors on December 4, 2006; Amended by the Board of Directors on February 5, 2007) The purpose of these guidelines and priorities is to provide direction from the Board of Directors to the Office of Management and Budget and District staff so that they can develop a sustainable, structurallybalanced budget that achieves, within available resources, the District’s mission and strategic goals. Employee Compensation: The budget should support progress toward achieving the strategic goal of competitive total compensation that results in improved customer service. The Office of Management and Budget is therefore directed to allocate funding for employee salary and benefit increases, including market and performance-based salary adjustments. 1. District base budgets will include allocations for performance-based salary adjustments averaging 3.5% (subject to available funding) for employees eligible under the performancebased salary adjustment plan for FY 2007-08. The budgeted rate for performance-based salary adjustments may not be increased without direction from the Board of Directors. The Employee Compensation Division of the Office of Management & Budget is directed to develop the FY 2007-08 Performance-Based Salary Advancement Plan consistent with FY 2006-07 and present it to the Board of Directors for review and approval. 2. To the extent allowed by availability of funds and internal equity with the County, funding for market adjustments will be prioritized to address only the most critical turnover, retention and recruitment issues that have a significant impact on critical public services. The District may not include requests for new market compensation funding in their budget requests. Base Budget Targets: Base budgets for all funds will be prepared within target amounts equal to their current budgets plus authorized adjustments. The Office of Management and Budget is directed to adjust budget targets for the following: 1. Annualized impact of FY 2006-07 mid-year appropriation adjustments. 2. Annualized impact of other items (including intergovernmental agreements) that were approved by the Board of Directors, so long as the impact was disclosed at the time of Board approval. 3. Items required by State law. 4. Estimated cost of performance-based salary adjustments for FY 2007-08 averaging 3.5%, as well as estimated employee benefit increases. 5. Other technical adjustments as required. The District must submit its base expenditure budget requests within budget targets. If justified by revenue projections, base revenue budget requests may exceed revenue targets. Revenue targets for non-General Fund budgets will include an adjustment as necessary to maintain structural balance (recurring revenues equal to or greater than recurring expenditures) within the fund. If the revenue target cannot be met, the District must reduce base expenditures and base revenue by an amount sufficient to restore structural balance. 112 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Base Budget Reductions Lower revenue growth will challenge the District to continue to provide results for the people it serves. In order to meet this challenge, the District is directed to work with the Office of Management and Budget to identify budget savings through greater efficiency and reduction or elimination of services that have little or no impact on results. Requests for Additional Funding: Funding for new initiatives will be extremely limited in FY 2007-08. Results Initiative Requests will not be considered unless directed by the Board of Directors. Capital Improvement Program The Office of Management and Budget is directed to work with District staff to develop an updated Capital Improvement Program and Capital Projects budget for FY 2007-08 that meets the strategic goal of developing, identifying funding, and begin implementing a long-range plan for addressing District capital infrastructure needs. The capital improvement program should be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis through a combination of operating revenues and non-recurring resources. 113 Maricopa County, Arizona FY 2007-08 Annual Business Strategies Attachments Minimum Fund Balances for Cash Flow Purposes Each year, the Department of Finance, in collaboration with the Office of Management and Budget, calculates the minimum fund balances needed for the upcoming fiscal year necessary to avoid shortterm borrowing (such as Line of Credit, Tax Anticipation Note, or Internal Borrowing Agreement) in the General Fund, Flood Control District, and Library District. OMB uses trend analysis to estimate revenue collection and spending patterns for each fund. In addition, the calculation model assumes growth commensurate with the Consumer Price Index. The model assumptions are re-examined each year and modified when necessary. Calculated minimum fund balance requirements for FY 2007-08 are listed in the table below, followed by fund-specific information. Fund Required Minimum Fund Balance Flood Control District $3,200,000 Library District $2,436,203 Flood Control District The Flood Control District has one fund available to finance its operational expenditures. The District utilizes a separate capital projects fund for its Capital Improvement Program, with expenditures supported by fund transfers from the Flood Control District’s operating fund. The Flood Control District operating fund’s principal source of revenue is a property tax. As a result, it shares the same pattern of fiscal low and high points as the County General Fund. For purposes of calculating the minimum fund balance, it is assumed that major intergovernmental revenues will be collected, and transfers to the capital projects fund will occur uniformly during the year. Library District Similar to the Flood Control District, the Library District only has one fund to finance its operations. The Library District’s principal source of revenue is a property tax, and has a fairly uniform spending pattern during the year. 114