September 2006 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Table of Contents ȱ 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 3 x Map of Corridor .................................................................................... 4 x Contract Log......................................................................................... 5 2. Cost Overview.............................................................................................. 6 x Project Budget Status .......................................................................... 9 x Plan vs. Actual ................................................................................... 11 x Current vs. Baseline........................................................................... 11 x Contingency Drawdown ..................................................................... 12 x CNPA Project Budget Status.............................................................. 13 3. Schedule Overview .................................................................................... 15 x Critical Path........................................................................................ 17 x Procurement Bid Status Report.......................................................... 19 4. Quality Assurance ...................................................................................... 20 5. Public Involvement ..................................................................................... 23 6. Disadvantage Business Enterprise Program.............................................. 27 x DBE Program Overview ..................................................................... 29 7. System Safety and Security ....................................................................... 30 8. Environmental Management ...................................................................... 31 9. Real Estate................................................................................................. 34 10. Utilities........................................................................................................ 37 x Prior Rights Utility Cost Status ........................................................... 43 11. Architecture ................................................................................................ 44 x Public Art............................................................................................ 44 x Station Finishes.................................................................................. 46 12. Facilities ..................................................................................................... 50 x Line Section 1 .................................................................................... 50 x Line Section 2 .................................................................................... 55 x Line Section 3 .................................................................................... 59 x Line Section 4 .................................................................................... 64 x Line Section 5 .................................................................................... 68 x 48th Street Bridge Replacement ......................................................... 73 x Town Lake Bridge .............................................................................. 74 x Maintenance and Storage Facility ...................................................... 77 x Park-and-Ride .................................................................................... 81 x Track Material Procurement ............................................................... 84 x Traffic Signal Procurement................................................................. 86 x Underfloor Wheel Profiling Machine................................................... 88 13. Systems ..................................................................................................... 89 x Automated Fare Collection System.................................................... 89 x Light Rail Vehicle ............................................................................... 92 x Signals and Communications............................................................. 96 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Traction Electrification System ......................................................... 101 14. Appendix .................................................................................................. 107 x Presentation Schedule ..................................................................... 107 x Acronyms ......................................................................................... 117 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 1. Executive Summary The Central Phoenix/East Valley (CP/EV) Light Rail Transit Project includes the design and construction of a 19.6 mile, double track, Minimum Operable Segment that extends from 19th Avenue near Bethany Home Road in North Central Phoenix through the downtown area to and through the City of Tempe, then crosses into the City of Mesa where the project terminates at Main Street and Sycamore. The track alignment is mostly in-street median and includes 27 passenger stations and eight surface parking lots, seven of which are newly constructed, and one existing lot owned by the City of Tempe near an LRT station site that will be dedicated to transit use at no cost to the Project. An initial fleet of 36 LRVs is part of the Project. The Project also includes a maintenance and storage facility to support the 36 light rail vehicles located South of Washington Street and East of 48th Street in Phoenix. Propulsion power for the LRVs will be delivered by a Traction Electrification System consisting of wayside substations distributing propulsion power through an Overhead Catenary System (OCS). The Project will also include a Signals and Communications System consisting of both wayside and traffic signals. The entity responsible for project delivery, Valley Metro Rail (METRO), is a sub-recipient to the grantee, the City of Phoenix. The Project has a budget of $1,412,000,000 Billion, with a Revenue Operations Date of December 2008. Major milestones/accomplishments this month include substantial utility progress on Camelback Road on LS 1, and the substantial completion of the Grand Canal Bridge on LS 2. The LS 3 contractor continues to make progress on rail installation, as does the LS 4 contractor. The first production track work has begun in LS 5. Permanent power is now connected at the MSF site, and the main switchboard and transformer in the MOE building has been tested, inspected and energized. Traction power substation rectifier-transformer equipment delivery has begun, and LRV 101 left Japan on September 30, 2006 heading to Baltimore. The project remains on schedule and within budget. Only 25 parcels remain that are not yet under city control, and only 80 are not yet available for construction, although only a small number of these parcels are negatively impacting the construction schedule. The energy of the project team is focused where it is needed most. In all line sections there are some parcels that remain unavailable for construction, but the outstanding parcels in Line Section 1 are of the highest priority. Intensity is increasing regarding negotiations with contractors about the impacts of the revised Master Schedule. Negotiations are progressing on LS1, LS2 and LS3, and the Systems contracts will be providing cost information in October, all in support of achieving the milestones included in the new Master Schedule. There continues to be a forecast of sufficient contingency remaining to complete the project within budget. Page 3 Buckeye Rd. Union Pacific RR Washington St. Jefferson St. Van Buren St. Roosevelt St. Papago Fwy. McDowell Rd. Encanto Blvd. Thomas Rd. 19th Ave. 10 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Central Ave. Osborn Rd. 15th Ave. 6 14 3rd St. 5 17 15 10 LINE SECTION 3 4.29 MILES 51 LINE SECTION 2 2.99 MILES PHOENIX 7th St. 7th Ave. 4 12th St. Indian School Rd. 3 16th St. Campbell Ave. 27th Ave. 2 16 l na Ca 10 S r ive R alt Sky Harbor International Airport nd ra G 17 153 18 143 202 L EGE N D 19 Papago Park 20 Park-and-Ride Location Station Location 21 Te m p TEMPE 22 STATI O N S 18. 44th Street / Washington 19. Priest Drive / Washington 20. Mill Avenue / Third Street 4. Central Avenue / Camelback 5. Campbell / Central Avenue 6. Indian School / Central Avenue 7. Osborn / Central Avenue 24. McClintock / Apache Boulevard 26 101 25 Rio Salado Pwy. 27 pe m Te MESA LINE SECTION 5 4.77 MILES 24 Curry Rd. Broadway Rd. Apache Blvd./ Main St. University Dr. l na Ca 202 12. Central Station / Central Avenue 25. Smith-Martin / Apache Boulevard Central Station / 1st Avenue 26. Price Freeway / Apache Boulevard 13. Washington / Central Avenue 27. Sycamore / Main Street Jefferson / 1st Avenue 14. 3rd Street / Washington 3rd Street / Jefferson 23. Dorsey / Apache Boulevard 22. University Drive / Rural 11. Roosevelt / Central Avenue 21. Fifth Street / College 9. Encanto / Central Avenue 10. McDowell / Central Avenue 8. Thomas / Central Avenue 3. 7th Avenue / Camelback 2. 19th Avenue / Camelback 15. 12th Street / Washington 12th Street / Jefferson 16. 24th Street / Washington 24th Street / Jefferson 17. 38th Street / Washington 1. Montebello / 19th Avenue 23 e To wn Lake TEMPE TOWN LAKE BRIDGE Maintenance & Storage Facility LINE SECTION 4 5.36 MILES 48th St. Camelback Rd. 32nd St. Sky Harbor People Mover System Priest Dr. 17 38th St. Light Rail Alignment Galv in P wy. Center Pkwy. 1 Mill Ave. Montebello Ave. College Ave. LINE SECTION 1 2.27 MILES Rural Rd. Bethany Home Rd. Dorsey Ln. LIGHT RAIL STARTER SEGMENT McClintock Dr. 40th St. 24th St. RAIL Smith-Martin Ln. Page 4 Price Fwy. ra Dobson Rd. e Sycamore nu e Av Alma School Rd. G nd M ETR O C O N TR A C T LO G -SEPTEM B ER 2006 ITEM C O N TR A C T N U M B ER C O N TR A C T D ESC R IPTIO N 1.PR O G R A M M A N A G EM EN T & EN G IN EER IN G 1 LR T-99-001 G EC -D EIS/FEIS/PE 2 LR T-02-001 G EC -FinalD esign 3 LR T-02-001 G EC -D SD C 4 LR T-98-001-PM C 5 LR T-03-005-C AC 2.C O N STR U C TIO N 6 LR T-03-007-B48 7 LR T-04-017-M SF 8 LR T-04-020-LS1 9 LR T-04-019-LS2 10 LR T-04-021-LS3 11 LR T-04-018-LS4 12 LR T-04-022-LS5 13 LR T-05-042-PN R 14 LR T-04-028-SF 15 LR T-04-040-TLB 16 LR T-05-036-W PM 3.SYSTEM ELEM EN TS C onstruction Adm inistration Services Parsons BrinckerhoffQ uade & D ouglas Parsons BrinckerhoffQ uade & D ouglas Parsons BrinckerhoffQ uade & D ouglas S.R .Beard & Associates LLC and Parsons Transportation G roup,Inc.,a JointVenture Post,Buckley,Schuh & Jernigan,Inc.,and PG H W ong Engineering,Inc.,a JointVenture 48th StreetBridge R eplacem ent M aintenance & Storage Facility (M SF) Line Section 1 Line Section 2 Line Section 3 Line Section 4 Line Section 5 Park and R ides Station Finishes Tow n Lake Bridge W heelProfiling M achine FN F C onstruction,Inc. Sundt/Stacey & W itbeck,JointVenture Kiew itW estern C o H erzog C ontracting C orp ArcherW estern C ontractors Sundt/Stacey & W itbeck,JointVenture Sundt/Stacey & W itbeck,JointVenture Undetermined ArcherW estern C ontractors PC L C ivilC onstructors,Inc. Sim m ons M achine ToolC orp ProjectM anagem entC onsultant 17 LR T-03-001 LightR ailVehicles (LR V) 18 LR T-04-039-S&C Signals and C om m unications 19 LR T-04-014-TES Traction Electrification System 20 LR T-06-053-FC S Fare C ollection System LightR ailC arM over 21 LR T-06-071-LC M 4.PU B LIC A R T 22 02-002-04 LS4 D esign Team Artist/Station Artist 23 02-002-03 LS2 D esign Team Artist/Station Artist 24 02-002-04 LS1 D esign Team Artist/Station Artist 25 02-002-05 LS5 D esign Team Artist/Station Artist 26 02-002-01 LS3 D esign Team Artist 27 05-041-AR T Bridge D esign Team Artist 28 02-002-07 LS3 D esign Team Artist 29 02-002-08 LS3 D esign Team Artist 30 02-002-09 44th StreetStation Artist 31 02-002-10 38th StreetStation Artist 32 02-002-11 C entral/R oosevelStation Artist 33 02-002-12 C entral/M cD ow ellStation Artist 34 02-002-13 FirstStreetStation Artist 35 02-002-14 Third StreetStation Artist 36 02-002-15 C entralStation,Station Artist 37 02-002-16 12th StreetStation Artist 38 02-002-17 Fifth Street/C ollege Station Artist 39 02-002-18 C entral/C am pbellStation Artist 40 02-002-19 C entral/Indian SchoolStation Artist 41 02-002-20 C entral/O sborn Station Artist 42 02-002-21 C entral/Thom as Station Artist 43 02-002-23 Third Street/M illStation Artist 44 02-002-24 Apache Stations -Lighting Artist 45 02-002-25 Apache Stations -C ulturalW eave Artist 46 02-002-26 Apache Stations -VerticalO bjects Artist 47 02-002-27 Apache Stations -Paving Artist 48 02-002-28 Longm ore Station Artist 49 02-002-29 19th Avenue /C am elback Station Artist 50 02-002-30 7th Avenue /C am elback Station Artist 51 02-002-31 24th StreetStation Artist 52 02-002-32 C entral/Encanto Station Artist 5.M ISC .C O N STR U C TIO N & SER VIC ES 53 LR T-05-046-ER S Environm entalR em ediation Service Pow erC onsulting Services 54 LR T-04-031-PC S M odularFurniture 55 LR T-06-052-M F Telecom C arrierServices 56 LR T-06-065-TC S W AN /LAN and IPT Voice Sys Equipm ent 57 LR T-06-057-W LI Strategic Planning C onsulting Services 58 LR T-04-034-SPC 59 LR T-05-045-D C S D ocum entC ontrolServices 60 LR T-05-037-AC S AuditC onsulting Services 61 LR T-05-038-R M S R isk M anagem entServices 62 LR T-06-069-SSC Safety & Security C ertification Services 63 LR T-06-067-ITS Info Technology-O ffice N etw ork Support Telecom m unications Services forM SF 64 LR T-07-082-TC S 6.O W N ER FU R N ISH ED M A TER IA LS 65 LR T-04-009-M P1 R ail(M P1) 66 LR T-04-010-M P2 C oncrete C rossties (M P2) 67 LR T-04-030-M P5 Ballasted SpecialTrackw ork (M P5) 68 LR T-04-032-M P8 G irderR ail(M P8) 69 LR T-04-033-M P9 G irderR ailSpecialTrackw ork (M P9) 70 LR T-04-015-M P3 Traffic SignalH ardw are (M P3) 71 LR T-06-072-SE Shop Equipm entforM aintenance Facility 7.FU TU R E LIG H T R A IL EXTEN SIO N S 71 LR T-06-050-D C S D esign C riteria & Standards Planning SupportServices 72 LR T-06-055-PSS 10/3/2006 C O N TR A C TO R Page 5 Kinkisharyo International,L.L.C .and M itsui& C o.(U .S.A),Inc.,C PEV JointVenture M ass Electric C orp. M ass Electric C orp. Scheidt& Bachm ann U SA,Inc. BrandtR oad R ailC orp Laurie Lundquist Ilan Averbuch R obertAdam s N orie Sato/BillW ill JanetZw eig BusterSim pson Laurie Lundquist R obertAdam s M ona H iguchi StuartKeeler/M ichaelM achnic PeterR ichards M ichaelM aglich Stephen Farley C liffG arten R ies N iem i VictorZaballa Tad Savinar AlPrice M ary Lucking Thom as Sayre Brian G oldbloom C atherine W idgery D an C orson C hristine Bourdette Suikang Zhao Benson Shaw Brad Konick Josh G arber N ubia O w ens Kevin Berry Jam ex & Einarde la Torre Environm entalR esponse Inc R W Beck Facilitec,Inc. Tim e W arnerTelecom C alence,Inc. D avis C onsulting LKG -C M C ,Inc C lifton G underson LLP Ashton Tiffany,LLC Booz Allen H am ilton,Inc W orld W ide Technology,Inc. Q w estC om m unications Progress R ailC orporation C XT Inc VAE N ortrak N orth Am erica Inc VAE N ortrak N orth Am erica Inc VAE N ortrak N orth Am erica Inc Various W issota Supply C om pany,Inc Stantec C onsulting H D R Engineering,Inc. 1 of1 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 2. Cost Overview Federal 5309 Project The project budget for the Federal 5309 program is $1,412,125,346. Known pending and executed change orders are valued at $36,035,325 of the available $84,536,664 planned contingency. Including Project Reserve, this leaves $59,108,409 of contingency funds available to the project. The project is 49.2 percent complete. Construction is 38.9 percent complete. Since the last reporting period, the contingency decreased by $2,932,752. Program Management and Administration Forecast is within budget. No major draws on contingency in this contract unit are anticipated. Program Management Consultant Staffing plan for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 is within the overall forecast of this contract unit. City Administration Forecasts are per agreements with the cities. Right of Way Acquisition Forecast is being evaluated. PE/FEIS Engineering Activity is complete. Engineering The final design budget and its associated contingency total $82,800,000. To date, $81,400,000 has been incurred. Work remaining consists of change orders, completion of Park and Rides design and vehicle engineering support. The Design Services During Construction budget totals $14,900,000 and $12,800,000 of this has been expended. METRO has $1,600,000 of contingency available to fund further work. Task Order No. 7 has obligated $1,270,513 of federal funds of this amount for change orders and continuation of final design tasks. Owner Furnished Equipment/Materials Forecasts are within budget. The work is 80.8 percent complete. Page 6 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Light Rail Vehicles Contingency appears to be sufficient to fund the work remaining. Facilities Facilities work is 38.8 percent complete. Executed and pending change orders are expected to utilize $17,700,000 of the $33,100,000 available contingency. Additional expected change orders for required acceleration, additional work and expected requests for equitable adjustment are challenging to the available balance of contingency. The forecast for prior right utilities continues to be a concern and is being evaluated. The basis of the budget was developed prior to approval of the Full Funding Grant Agreement. Since then there have been significant increases in material costs and changes in market conditions. Portions of the work are being transferred to the line section contracts for schedule mitigation reasons. Systems Systems work is 26.1 percent complete. Remaining contingency is at 81 percent of the contingency budget and will likely be required to accelerate the systems work. Construction Administration Services The forecast appears adequate though there is some uncertainty as to the cost of archaeological/environmental remediation work that will be assigned to the consultant. Negotiation of the Construction Administration Consultant Contract (to extend services in line with the December 2008 schedule) will determine the final cost of these services and is nearly complete. Testing and Startup Forecast continues to show and under run to the budget. Art Program Forecast appears sufficient to complete the work. Unallocated Design Contingency Budget was utilized to fund variances between bid amounts and original budgets. Project Reserve Remaining Project Reserve is forecast at $7,300,000. Page 7 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Financing Costs Forecast indicates an under run to the budget and is being evaluated on a periodic basis. Concurrent Non Project Activities Project The budget for Concurrent Non Project Activities is $94,996,637, based on the January 2006 METRO Board approved amount. Task Order funding of $150,000 was provided to the GEC for preliminary work on the 11th Street Loop Track. Funding for this has not been secured yet. Change orders continue to be processed for City of Phoenix Water Services Department work. Page 8 Valley Metro Rail Program Control CP/EV LRT Project Project Budget Status Federal 5309 Project Description Element 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 5K 58 5G 59 5A 5B 81 LS1 19th Ave/Bethany - Camelback/Central LS2 Camelback/Central - McDowell Road LS3 McDowell Road - 28th Street LS4 28th Street - N Approach to Town Lake LS5 1st Street - Sycamore Station Finishes Park and Ride Facilities Miscellaneous Construction Archaeological Investigations/Hazardous Material Removal MSF Construction/Equipment Installation MSF Underfloor Wheel Profiling System 48th Street Bridge Restoration Town Lake Bridge Prior Rights Utility Relocations Contingency Facilities 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 81 Rail Procurement Concrete Crosstie Procurement Traffic Signal Hardware Ballasted Special Trackwork Procurement Crossing Panel Procurement Girder Rail Procurement Girder Rail Special Trackwork Procurement Contingency Owner Furnished Materials/Equipment 5D 5E 5F 81 FFGA Attachment 3 Board Revised Budget 2006_09 Current Actual $ (To Date) Forecast Variance $27,130,856 $38,004,059 $63,981,654 $46,622,020 $49,680,435 $38,701,950 $15,104,339 $7,505,200 $0 $57,637,721 $0 $2,014,013 $15,529,600 $22,938,000 $37,491,841 $422,341,688 $40,991,524 $49,231,868 $81,304,730 $51,966,787 $69,997,409 $52,985,000 $15,104,339 $4,501,200 $1,004,000 $64,015,887 $980,107 $2,824,232 $21,884,369 $21,054,084 $16,252,717 $494,098,253 $9,714,219 $9,944,969 $23,397,036 $25,185,313 $26,281,751 $3,304,699 $0 $0 $21,249 $56,104,974 $343,038 $2,824,232 $20,825,570 $10,010,927 $0 $187,957,977 $41,687,062 $49,274,715 $81,430,668 $52,140,395 $70,062,844 $52,985,000 $20,907,699 $4,501,200 $1,004,000 $63,543,061 $980,107 $2,824,232 $21,905,386 $27,792,387 $15,471,463 $506,510,219 $1,306,200 $900,000 $8,060,100 $2,532,414 $380,100 $15,079,742 $0 $1,412,863 $29,671,419 $1,271,080 $751,492 $8,060,100 $2,291,498 $360,096 $14,526,798 $5,712,656 $865,480 $33,839,200 $1,251,101 $718,285 $6,821,329 $2,253,875 $0 $14,293,479 $747,774 $0 $26,085,843 $1,271,080 $751,492 $8,060,100 $2,291,498 $0 $14,526,798 $5,712,656 $846,480 $33,460,104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,096 $0 $0 $19,000 $379,096 Fare Collection Machines Traction Power Substations/Overhead Catenary System Communications/Signals Contingency Systems $10,755,800 $62,141,100 $38,220,002 $8,674,000 $119,790,902 $7,100,012 $56,874,356 $38,344,018 $5,542,926 $107,861,312 $0 $16,912,345 $8,871,776 $0 $25,784,121 $7,101,612 $56,948,754 $38,470,746 $5,340,200 $107,861,312 ($1,600) ($74,398) ($126,728) $202,726 $0 Sub Total, Construction $571,804,009 $635,798,765 $239,827,941 $647,831,635 ($12,032,870) 4K 4N Vehicle Contract LRT Vehicle Contract Contingency LRT Vehicles $115,501,823 $5,775,001 $121,276,824 $117,625,456 $2,512,813 $120,138,269 $20,672,257 $0 $20,672,257 $117,625,456 $2,512,813 $120,138,269 22 23 20 ROW Acquisition ROW Contingency ROW $116,214,150 $20,081,000 $136,295,150 $116,214,150 $19,570,482 $135,784,632 $127,569,361 $0 $127,569,361 $134,000,000 $0 $134,000,000 Page 9 ($695,538) ($42,847) ($125,938) ($173,608) ($65,435) $0 ($5,803,360) $0 $0 $472,826 $0 $0 ($21,017) ($6,738,303) $781,254 ($12,411,966) $0 $0 $0 ($17,785,850) $19,570,482 $1,784,632 Valley Metro Rail Program Control CP/EV LRT Project Project Budget Status Federal 5309 Project Description Element FFGA Attachment 3 Board Revised Budget 2006_09 Current Actual $ (To Date) Forecast Variance 30 PE/FEIS Engineering $25,054,938 $25,054,938 $25,054,938 $25,054,938 31 4L 20 32 33 34 Engineering Vehicle Engineering ROW Engineering Design Services During Construction Engineering Contingency DSDC Contingency Engineering $76,780,935 $5,432,358 $1,016,370 $14,160,426 $0 $0 $97,390,089 $76,091,060 $5,555,358 $1,321,163 $14,877,262 $1,112,105 $329,487 $99,286,435 $75,222,079 $4,807,923 $1,386,172 $12,783,953 $0 $0 $94,200,127 $76,642,352 $5,555,358 $1,386,172 $19,877,262 $501,898 $329,487 $104,292,529 60 61 CAC Contract CAC Contingency Construction Administration Services $37,759,127 $15,244,622 $53,003,749 $38,368,729 $1,065,984 $39,434,713 $26,853,286 $0 $26,853,286 $59,401,079 $1,065,984 $60,467,063 ($551,292) $0 ($65,009) ($5,000,000) $610,207 $0 ($5,006,094) $0 ($21,032,350) $0 ($21,032,350) 10 11 62 67 21 76 16 17 18 PE Administrative/Management Costs Administrative/Management - VMR Construction Administration Services - VMR CAB Program Administrative ROW Costs Administrative/Management Art Program Costs Administrative/Management - ADOT Agency Insurance Cost Administrative/Management Contingency Program Management $4,363,526 $43,915,047 $1,697,232 $0 $696,712 $414,632 $420,000 $7,000,000 $58,507,149 $4,363,526 $44,228,316 $3,087,589 $2,500,000 $696,712 $414,632 $930,000 $7,000,000 $11,910,551 $75,131,326 $4,363,526 $24,366,234 $2,096,678 $836,474 $506,334 $0 $385,365 $3,629,060 $0 $36,183,671 $4,363,526 $44,212,844 $3,087,589 $2,500,000 $696,712 $414,632 $930,000 $7,000,000 $1,824,969 $65,030,272 $0 $15,472 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,085,582 $10,101,054 10 21 76 12 4M 63 PE Administrative/Management Costs Administrative ROW Costs Administrative/Management Art Program Costs Administrative/Management - PMC Administrative Vehicle Costs Construction Administration Services - PMC Program Management Consultant $12,832,472 $1,016,571 $549,061 $32,736,326 $1,337,322 $4,581,527 $53,053,279 $12,832,472 $1,016,571 $549,061 $32,736,326 $1,337,322 $5,081,527 $53,553,279 $12,832,472 $793,865 $234,041 $21,653,782 $561,908 $2,539,229 $38,615,297 $12,832,472 $981,934 $501,189 $33,684,591 $1,337,322 $4,215,771 $53,553,279 $0 $34,637 $47,872 ($948,265) $0 $865,756 $0 10 13 64 14 15 PE Administrative/Management Costs Administrative/Management - COP Construction Administration Services - COP Administrative/Management - COT Administrative/Management - COM City Administration $3,158,439 $2,986,000 $8,347,000 $6,797,000 $897,000 $22,185,439 $3,158,439 $5,448,000 $5,885,000 $6,797,000 $897,000 $22,185,439 $3,158,439 $4,994,625 $2,952,003 $5,146,515 $263,164 $16,514,746 $3,158,439 $5,451,406 $5,881,594 $6,797,000 $897,000 $22,185,439 $0 ($3,406) $3,406 $0 $0 $0 75 77 Public Art Contracts Art Program Contingency Public Art $5,284,133 $999,000 $6,283,133 $6,095,129 $188,004 $6,283,133 $2,399,616 $0 $2,399,616 $6,095,129 $188,004 $6,283,133 $0 $0 $0 70 Start-Up and Testing $31,000,000 $30,000,000 $65,107 $26,000,000 $4,000,000 80 85 Unallocated Design Contingency Project Reserve $7,575,241 $69,829,000 $0 $10,607,071 $0 $0 $0 $7,288,789 $0 $3,318,282 $1,253,258,000 $1,253,258,000 $627,956,347 $1,272,125,346 $158,867,346 $158,867,346 $5,717,401 $140,000,000 $18,867,346 $1,412,125,346 $1,412,125,346 $633,673,748 $1,412,125,346 $0 SUBTOTAL 90 Financing Costs TOTAL CP/EV PROJECT Page 10 $0 ($18,867,346) Ju n0 Ju 6 l-0 Au 6 gSe 06 pO 06 ct N 06 ov -0 D 6 ec Ja 06 nFe 07 bM 07 ar Ap 07 r-0 M 7 ay Ju 07 n0 Ju 7 l-0 Au 7 gSe 07 pO 07 ct N 07 ov -0 D 7 ec Ja 07 nFe 08 bM 08 ar Ap 08 r M -0 8 ay Ju 08 n0 Ju 8 lAu 0 8 gSe 08 pO 08 ct N 08 ov D 08 ec -0 8 $900,000,000 $800,000,000 Percent $ O ct -0 4 D ec -0 4 Fe b05 Ap r-0 5 Ju n05 Au g05 O ct -0 5 D ec -0 5 Fe b06 Ap r-0 6 Ju n06 Au g06 O ct -0 6 D ec -0 6 Fe b07 Ap r-0 7 Ju n07 Au g07 O ct -0 7 D ec -0 7 Fe b08 Ap r-0 8 Ju n08 Au g08 O ct -0 8 D ec -0 8 Plan versus Actual Costs $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 $0 Actual Current Early FFGA Average Planned Current versus Baseline 100% $1,200,000,000 $1,100,000,000 80% $1,000,000,000 60% $700,000,000 40% $600,000,000 20% $500,000,000 $400,000,000 0% Months Current Late Page 11 FFGA Early FFGA Late Actual Page 12 $0.0 Aug-04 $30.0 $60.0 $90.0 $120.0 $150.0 $180.0 $ Million Feb-05 Change Order Contingency Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 Feb-06 Unallocated Design Contingency Aug-05 CP/EV LRT Contingency Drawdown Aug-06 Project Reserve May-06 Phoenix Public Transit Phoenix Streets Phoenix Aviation Phoenix W ater Page 13 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 J1 J2 J3 J5 A7 A7 D2 D6 E9 F3 A3 D1 E3 E4 E5 J6 K3 K7 A1 A2 A5 A6 A7 B1 F4 F5 F6 F7 FB H1 H2 H3 H4 J6 Elem ent $9,900,351 $6,255,348 $15,367,099 $4,935,839 $453,006 $1,187,352 $1,083,586 $29,192 $432,039 $39,643,811 $83,768,329 Sub TotalW ater Services D epartm ent Total-Phoenix $5,087,047 Sub TotalA viation D epartm ent LS 1 W ater/Sanitary Sew er LS 2 W ater/Sanitary Sew er LS 3 W ater/Sanitary Sew er LS 4 W ater/Sanitary Sew er W aterand Sanitary Sew erLines -48th St.Bridge R eplacem entC ontract C athodic Protection forW aterlines LS1 C athodic Protection forW aterlines LS2 C athodic Protection forW aterlines LS3 C athodic Protection forW aterlines LS4 $2,917,270 $906,881 $919,161 $216,000 $67,735 $60,000 $12,490,867 $9,820,210 $492,574 $264,342 $1,482,845 $430,896 $0 $0 $0 $26,546,604 $0 $0 $0 $287,174 $269,395 $3,932,769 $806,300 $108,770 $6,344,743 $6,968,744 $4,649,580 $881,613 $2,208,231 $89,285 44th Street/W ashington TransitC enter(SF) W ashington StreetTransitC enterC hanges 44th StreetStation People M overFoundation (LS4) People M over-APS D uctBank @ 40th Place 10" W aterLine at42nd/W ashington LS 4 Archaeological/H azardous M aterialTesting (C AC ) Sub TotalStreets D epartm ent 6th Lane -C am elback (LS1) AdditionalStreet/Pedestrian Lighting (LS3) SealC oatversus R ubberO verlay (LS 1 ) SealC oatversus R ubberO verlay (LS 3) SealC oatversus R ubberO verlay (LS 4) W ashington/Jefferson Large Vehicle Access R ed LightEnforcem ent 11th StreetLoop Track Sub TotalPublic TransitD epartm ent Bus Bays (LS2) Phoenix ArtM useum LeftTurn Signal 19th/M ontebello TransitC enter(SF) 117 C entral/C am elback TransitC enter(SF) 44th Street/W ashington TransitC enterR ealEstate W ashington StreetBike Lane (LS4) C ivic Plaza Track SupportSystem AdditionalW aterServices to the Pueblo G rande M useum -LS4 C entral/C am elback Bus Bays R elocation C O P Landscape Irrigation R estoration C entralAve FiberO ptic D uctbanks FiberO ptic LS1 FiberO ptic LS2 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-3 (Phoenix portion) FiberO ptic Backbone LS-4 (Phoenix portion) W ashington/Jefferson 16th to 26th Street,Property Access D escription Jan 2006 Approved Total Valley M etro R ailProgram C ontrol C P/EV LR T Project ProjectB udgetStatus C N PA Project $79,928,266 $36,686,664 $8,793,300 $5,455,253 $14,462,098 $5,305,818 $155,767 $1,099,400 $979,408 $0 $435,620 $3,964,798 $2,821,529 $0 $806,000 $216,000 $61,269 $60,000 $12,654,895 $9,820,210 $509,602 $264,342 $1,479,845 $430,896 $0 $0 $150,000 $26,621,909 $806,300 $108,770 $6,344,743 $7,018,744 $4,649,580 $906,604 $2,208,231 $89,285 $7,500 $75,000 $6,736 $0 $0 $213,922 $154,479 $4,032,015 R evised Budget/Estim ate $32,880,137 $14,423,303 $1,347,742 $963,669 $7,596,092 $4,080,796 $155,767 $84,775 $108,842 $0 $85,620 $1,591,661 $587,759 $0 $594,208 $326,527 $47,020 $36,147 $7,624,518 $7,255,110 $250,963 $17,104 $90,509 $10,832 $0 $0 $0 $9,240,655 $755,507 $0 $2,273,413 $1,921,015 $2,680,145 $541,499 $157,475 $62,262 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,016 $19,128 $819,195 C urrent Actual$ (To D ate) $78,720,210 $35,640,593 $8,793,300 $5,311,368 $14,536,820 $5,308,318 $155,767 $1,099,400 $0 $0 $435,620 $3,986,226 $2,842,957 $0 $806,000 $216,000 $61,269 $60,000 $12,835,879 $9,820,210 $509,602 $264,342 $1,479,814 $430,896 $143,330 $37,685 $150,000 $26,257,512 $965,311 $108,770 $5,562,567 $6,678,579 $4,900,509 $930,257 $2,208,231 $89,285 $200,565 $108,702 $6,736 $0 $0 $213,922 $154,479 $4,129,599 Forecast $1,208,056 $1,046,071 $0 $143,885 ($74,722) ($2,500) $0 $0 $979,408 $0 $0 ($21,428) ($21,428) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($180,984) $0 $0 $0 $31 $0 ($143,330) ($37,685) $0 $364,397 ($159,011) ($0) $782,176 $340,165 ($250,929) ($23,653) ($0) ($0) ($193,065) ($33,702) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($97,584) Variance 2006_09 Tem pe M esa Arizona State U niversity Various Page 14 E1 E8 F8 FB H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 A9 FB H3 H4 H5 N3 XX A8 AA B8 C1 C2 C7 D4 E5 E6 F2 FB H4 H5 J4 J9 K1 K2 K4 N4 XX Elem ent $174,649 $0 $0 $0 $174,649 (APS)D uctBank at48th St.U tility Bridge,ArchaeologicalSupport C N PA N on C ity ProjectR eserve R ojo Lofts Property FiberO ptic D uctbanks Sub TotalO ther $94,996,638 $877,239 Sub TotalA SU G rand TotalC N PA $0 $0 $228,371 $183,411 $465,458 $0 $6,329,442 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-1 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-2 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-3 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-4 FiberO ptic Backbone LS-5 FiberO ptic C om m /Signals Sub TotalM esa $5,531,609 $0 $271,270 $229,216 $297,345 M ain Sycam ore TransitC enter FiberO ptic D uctbanks FiberO ptic Backbone LS-3 (M esa portion) FiberO ptic Backbone LS-4 (M esa portion) FiberO ptic Backbone LS-5 (M esa portion) M esa M arketAnalysis M esa M iscellaneous Force AccountW ork LS5 $0 $3,846,979 $0 $735,400 $0 $38,105 $24,000 $0 $116,990 $345,014 $671,372 $624,873 $200,129 $0 $185,372 $237,901 $158,637 $509,186 $0 $0 $0 Sub TotalTem pe 5th/C ollege TransitC enter C O T SR P PriorR ights TC R elocation Terrace /Apache W aterline C oordination (D esign O nly) AdditionalC om m unications C onduits C O T ASU Pedestrian Signal Parking Facility 5th/Farm er C O T AdditionalStreetLighting (LS5) C O T R ubberized AC O verlay LS4 R ubberized AsphaltLS5 M cC lintock /Apache Storm D rain FiberO ptic D uctbanks FiberO ptic Backbone LS-4 (Tem pe portion) FiberO ptic Backbone LS-5 (Tem pe portion) C athodic Protection ofW aterline LS4 C O #15 U niversity D rive Station Bus Interface Veteran's W ay-5th/C ollege TC Bus ShelterElectrification W ashington/C enterParkw ay Station Tem pe M arketAnalysis Tem pe M iscellaneous Force AccountW ork LS5 D escription Jan 2006 Approved Total Valley M etro R ailProgram C ontrol C P/EV LR T Project ProjectB udgetStatus C N PA Project $93,726,724 $286,924 $278,331 $0 $0 $8,593 $1,200,479 $27,987 $91,367 $265,288 $214,061 $236,497 $365,279 $6,327,023 $5,531,611 $8,593 $269,091 $230,308 $263,878 $18,542 $5,000 $5,984,032 $759,989 $244,080 $38,105 $32,499 $123,637 $116,990 $345,014 $523,214 $624,874 $611,695 $3,967 $173,054 $200,467 $158,638 $509,186 $7,645 $11,076 $1,435,524 $44,378 $20,000 R evised Budget/Estim ate $36,028,709 $57,870 $57,870 $0 $0 $0 $186,593 $0 $9,200 $4,043 $0 $173,350 $0 $1,490,346 $1,483,118 $0 $4,490 $0 $0 $0 $2,738 $1,413,763 $658,992 $0 $35,577 $24,271 $58,158 $110,207 $199,949 $0 $0 $42,667 $0 $15,000 $22,519 $109,791 $0 $1,882 $0 $124,042 $0 $10,708 C urrent Actual$ (To D ate) $92,392,876 $152,933 $62,342 $0 $81,998 $8,593 $1,197,319 $27,987 $91,367 $262,128 $214,061 $236,497 $365,279 $6,326,999 $5,531,587 $8,593 $269,091 $230,308 $263,878 $18,542 $5,000 $5,995,415 $763,154 $244,080 $38,105 $32,499 $123,637 $110,207 $345,014 $523,215 $624,874 $611,695 $3,967 $188,054 $200,467 $158,638 $509,186 $7,645 $11,076 $1,435,524 $44,378 $20,000 Forecast $1,330,688 $133,991 ($81,998) $215,989 $3,160 $0 $0 $3,160 $0 $0 $0 $24 $24 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($11,383) ($3,165) $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,783 $0 ($1) $0 $0 $0 ($15,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Variance 2006_09 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 3. Schedule Overview The current Status of the Master Schedule is based on a data date of October 1, 2006. The current forecast continues to be an on-time Program completion date of Saturday, December 27, 2008. Line Section Contracts 1 and 2 continue to have right-of-way, cost to cure and private utility relocation issues that have impacted access dates and interim Milestones. Metro management continues to aggressively manage these issues, resulting in minimum impact to the overall Program Schedule/or contract milestones. To date, the Program has been successful in mitigating delays with a minimum of acceleration to Civil Contracts. During the last month, follow-up meetings continued with the Line Section Contracts, TES, S&C and Station Finishes. These reviews are focused on the development of the contractors revised detail schedules, supporting the new Master Schedule. During the month of September, 2006, there were no major contract procurement activities Revised Baseline Preliminary Schedule Highlights: Civil: Line Section 1 Completion: February, 2008 Line Section 2 Completion: December, 2007 Line Section 3 Completion: January, 2008 Test Track Completion: February, 2007 Line Section 4 Completion: December, 2007 Line Section 5 Completion: March, 2008 Maint/Storage Facility Completion: January, 2007 Tempe Town Lake: August, 2006 Station Finishes: October, 2008 Park and Ride October, 2008 Systems: Signals and Communications: October, 2008 Fare Collection: November, 2008 Traction Electrification: August, 2008 Page 15 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Startup: Start Integrated Testing Area 1 Washington/Jefferson/25th St to 5th St/College (All of LS-4, parts of LS-3 & LS-5): March, 2008 Start Integrated Testing Area 2 Balance of LS-3 and Balance of LS-5 June, 2008 Start Integrated Testing Area 3 All of LS-2 and LS-1 July, 2008 Critical Path(s): The Program critical Paths run through Right of Way and Private Utility relocations in the Line Sections to the completion of the Station Foundations in the Line Sections, through the Completion of the stations to a point that the Signals and Communications Contractor can install the signals equipment and wiring, through the completion of the track-way in the Line Sections, thru the installation of the Overhead Contact System (OCS) to the Phased Integrated Testing, to the Completion of the Safety Certification, to Pre-Revenue Operations to the Revenue Service date of late December, 2008. Page 16 Activity ID Orig Rem% Dur Dur Start Finish 2006 2007 2008 2009 J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J Line Section 5 Utility Relocations LS5_HAM23 397* 244* 01MAY06A 01JUN07 LS5_HAM22 125* LS1_HAM22 176* LS2_HAM22 236* 111* 29MAY06A 19JAN07 LS3_HAM23 123* 1* 01JUN06A 01OCT06 LS2_HAM23 154* 32* 01JUN06A 01NOV06 LS1_HAM23 319* 197* 01JUN06A 15APR07 SF_HAM03 265* 265* 01OCT06 22JUN07 SF_HAM01 547* 547* 01OCT06 30MAR08 SF, Line Section 1 SF_HAM02 547* 547* 01OCT06 30MAR08 SF, Line Section 2 LS4_4 Line Section 5 ROW 0* 29MAY06A Line Section 1 ROW 51* 29MAY06A 20NOV06 0 0 Line Section 2 ROW Line Section 3 Utility Relocations Line Section 2 Utility Relocations Line Section 1 Utility Relocations SF, Line Section 3 LS-4 Milestone 1 48th St to 56th St 15NOV06* Access for TES/S&C-Trackway Complete TES_4010 87 87 16NOV06 10FEB07 TES_4006 112 112 16NOV06 07MAR07 619* 619* 05DEC06 14AUG08 SF_HAM05 LS4_5 0 0 TES - LS-4 OCS Construction Test Track TES - LS-4 OCS Construction Wash/Central SF, Line Section 5 LS-4 Milestone 2 44th St to 48th St 21JAN07* Access for TES/S&C - Trackway Complete LS5_4 0 0 LS-5 - MS A2 TES/S&C Access (Startup Area 1) 09FEB07* TLB to 1867+00 Trackwork, OCS Fndn's TES_4004 LS5_8 227* 227* 31MAR07* 0 0 TES - LS-4 OCS Construction 25th to 44th St 12NOV07 LS-5 - Milestone C2 TES/S&C Access 18JUN07* E of McClintock to 1981+40 E of 101 Track/OCS Unrestricted Trackway Access TES_5012 117 117 19JUN07 13OCT07 TES - LS-5 OCS Const McClintock to 101 TES_5014 110 110 23JUN07 10OCT07 TES - LS-5 OCS Const 101 to Dobson SC_2002 62 62 27JUN07 27AUG07 TES_3000 100 100 03JUL07 10OCT07 SC_1003 25 25 28JUL07 21AUG07 S&C at LS-1 - 7th Ave/Camelback Area Const SC_3004 37 37 28JUL07 02SEP07 S&C, LS-2 Central/Indian School Sta Const SC_2001 329 329 02AUG07 25JUN08 SC_1002 50 50 11AUG07 29SEP07 210* 210* 16SEP07 12APR08 TES_3004 TES_1010 75 75 11OCT07 S&C, LS-2 Earl X-ovr TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 16th to 26th St S&C, LS-2 Pierson X-ovr Bldg #1 S&C at LS-1 -19th Ave/Camelback Area Const TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 3rd to Roosevelt TES - LS-1 - OCS Construction 24DEC07 Central/Camelback to 19th Ave Start Date Finish Date Data Date Run Date 01AUG04 26DEC08 01OCT06 06OCT06 08:51 Early Bar Progress Bar 6010 Sheet 1 of 2 Valley Metro Rail Critical Activity Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT © Primavera Systems, Inc. Revised Master Page 17 Critical Path Activity ID TES_5016 TES_3002 Orig Rem% Dur Dur 110 Start Finish 110 11OCT07 28JAN08 180* 180* 16OCT07 12APR08 TES_2020 150 150 20NOV07 17APR08 TES_1090 75 75 11JAN08 25MAR08 2006 2007 2008 2009 J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J TES - LS-5 OCS Const Dobson to EOL TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 7th to 16th St TES - LS-2 -OCS Construction TES - LS-1 - OCS Construction N of Bethany Home to 19th TESM10A_2 0 INTTESTA_2 60 TESM10B_2 0 0 12APR08 TURNOVER_3 0 0 15MAY08* INTTESTB_2 45 TESM10C_2 0 TURNOVER_4 0 INTTESTC_2 30 0 60 16MAR08 22FEB08* 14MAY08* TES New Milestone 10A - Compl TES Work Area 1 Integ.Tests Area 1 -Track, Clearance, TES TES New Milestone 10B - Compl TES Work Area 2 Turnover Area 2 to VMR Operations 29JUN08 Integ.Tests Area 2 -Track, Clearance, TES 0 27JUN08* TES New Milestone 10C - Compl TES Work Area 3 0 06AUG08 Turnover Area 3 to VMR Operations 05SEP08 Integ.Tests Area 3 -Track, Clearance, TES TES Milestone 10 - Complete TES Work 45 16MAY08 30 07AUG08 TES_999 0 0 08AUG08 TURNOVER_5 0 0 15AUG08 T/O OCC/Comm. Entire Line to VMR Operations Integ.Tests Entire Line - Dynamic Signal & Comm INTTESTD_2 60 60 17AUG08 15OCT08 SCHCONT_2 41 41 16OCT08 25NOV08 Allowance for Re-Testing INTTESTC_C 0 0 25NOV08 Complete Integrated Testing SFTYCERT_2 0 0 25NOV08* PREREV_2 PREREVC_2 31 31 26NOV08 0 0 27DEC08 Complete Safety Certification Process Pre-Revenue Operation 26DEC08 Revenue Service Date (ROD) Sheet 2 of 2 Page 18 Page 19 04/06/07 Issue D ate 09/07/06 TBD 08/28/06 N /A TBD NA 10/23/06 11/10/06 10/18/06 10/16/06 TBD 08/29/06 NA TBD 08/21/06 08/30/06 & 09/26/06 08/28/06 07/24/06 06/27/06 05/16/06 07/12/06 TBD TBD TBD NA NA 06/20/06 06/06/07 B id O pening 05/03/07 04/24/07 Pre-B id C onf LR T Vehicle M aintenance – R FP 04/20/06 LR T System s and Facilities TBD M aintenance -R FP LR T Transportation Services 04/27/06 R FP LegalServices 05/19/06 LegalServices (Sm allC laim s) 05/19/06 M aintenance M anagem ent 07/10/06 Inform ation System IT N etw ork Equipm ent– R e-bid 09/25/06 O n C allPrinting Services TBD M odularFurniture forM SF -IFB 08/14/06 M SF Spray PaintBooth M anlifts 08/21/06 -IFB Pow erC onsulting Services TBD Telecom m unications Services at 07/26/06 M SF PA R T II– LO N G R A N G E D EVELO PM EN T PR O JEC TS Planning,C onceptual Engineering,and Environm ental 08/10/06 Studies forFuture LightR ail Extensions N orthw estLR T Extension 10/11/06 Engineering Services N ote:significantdelays in the IFB due to the design hold forthe C entral& C am elback site PA R T I– C P/EV LR T PR O JEC TS Park and R ides (Tentative) Title 02/21/07 01/17/07 NA TBD N /A 11/15/06 TBD 09/20/06 12/20/06 TBD TBD 11/15/06 TBD 10/18/06 07/18/07 B oard A w ard Procurem entB id Status R eportas of9/28/06 03/01/07 02/12/07 09/18/06 TBD 10/02/06 11/24/06 TBD 10/02/06 01/15/07 TBD TBD 12/18/06 TBD 11/20/06 08/06/07 N TP (A nticipated) SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 4. Quality Assurance Description The METRO Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for the establishment and implementation of a Quality Assurance Program for the METRO organization that meets the requirements of the Federal Transit Administration and provides adequate confidence that procured materials and services meet the technical and quality requirements of the project. The METRO Quality Assurance Manager is assisted by the Quality Assurance Managers for the GEC for design, the GEC for LRT Vehicle procurement and the CAC for construction, installation, inspection and testing. Individually and collectively, the Quality Assurance Managers are responsible for ensuring the effective implementation of the Quality Assurance Programs for their respective organizations and contractors. The Quality Assurance Managers are responsible for approval of quality programs, assessment of compliance with quality programs through inspections, audits and surveillances and for identifying nonconforming materials, parts and services and assuring effective corrective action. Progress QUALITY MANUALS REVIEWED: x Station Finishes QC Plan was approved as noted. x LS1 QC Plan was resubmitted for review, with minor comments. Resubmittal due in October. Comments do not affect quality of construction activities. QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS/SURVEILLANCES: x The CAC commenced an audit of the TLB closeout activities. The scope of the audit is verification of compliance with Spec 01770, “Closeout Procedure,” and Spec 01789, “Contract Record Documents”. While some closeout activities have been completed, others are still in progress. The Audit will be left open and resume as necessary to allow all items to be completed. x The CAC conducted an audit of the TES Resident Engineers’ activities for compliance with the quality aspects of the CAC Resident Engineers Manual. The scope of the audit was contract drawings, daily diary and weekly report, Contractor submittals, file system, records, NCR process, material sampling and testing, and oversight inspection. Two minor audit findings were issued. x The CAC conducted an audit of the LS1 Contractor. The scope of the audit was receipt inspection, material identification and traceability, contract record documents, and material test reports. The Contractor was found to be in full compliance with the requirements. No audit findings were issued. Page 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x The CAC conducted an audit of the LS2 Contractor. The scope of the audit was document control, test plan, preparatory meetings, M&TE control, and NCR and QARF response. Two minor audit findings were issued. x The CAC performed surveillance of the OCS Pole fabricator, SSP in Ft. Worth, Texas to witness OCS Pole Deflection testing and inspection of OCS pole welding and paint. Issued were identified and have been forwarded to MEC Quality Assurance to resolve. x A first article inspection was performed by the CAC at Trinity Metal Products for the Station Finish structural steel columns. In addition, Station Finishes Light Frames that were rejected on NCR 001 were re-inspected as well as new frames. Resolution is still pending, however, several frames will be scrapped and several will be repaired. VEHICLE ACQUISITION x Quality Manuals o No Quality Manuals reviewed during this period x Audits o No Audits performed during this period x Documents Reviewed o CDRL PHX-404, VMP 3.1.2, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-434, VMP 3.1.17, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-660, VMP 4.9.2, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-662, VMP 4.9.3, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-664, VMP 4.9.4, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-666, VMP 4.9.5, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-668, VMP 4.9.6, Rev. 0 o CDRL PHX-672, VMP 5.1.1, Rev. 1 o CDRL PHX-712, VMP 5.17.2, Rev. 2 x Inspections (U.S.) o PSI of Traction Motors at Everson Tesla o PSI of Windows and glass at NAG o PSI bellows at Hubner Page 21 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o Re-FAI of Bumper at Hubner x Inspection (Japan) o FAI of entire vehicle conducted in Osaka o Ongoing daily In process inspections (IPI) o Monitoring ongoing qualification and routine tests x Meetings o No meetings attended this month. x Open NCRs and Audit items o No NCRs generated during this reporting period. All previously generated NCRs have been closed. x General Engineering Consultant o No GEC Audits were conducted in September Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Quality Assurance activities remain within budget and on schedule. Issues and Solutions x Nonconformances on the OCS Poles are in the process of being technically reviewed by the GEC. Existing poles will be accepted for the MSF yard, however all poles on the alignment must meet identified technical requirements. Mitigation Plan was received, however, the GEC is still in the process of issuing concurrence of the plan. x Two Quality Action Requests (QARs) were issued to Mass Electric on the Traction Electrification System Contract for lack of adequate inspection personnel; lack of inspection and surveillance reports, lack of inspection and failure to implement an internal and external audit program. Response was received and rejected and new draft response was received from Mass Electric and will be responded to by October 7th. x Two flawed girder rails were discovered at the LS5 welding site. This item is essentially closed with the exception of two missing pieces of rail, and the submission of the final report. Resolution is being pursued. Page 22 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 5. Public Involvement Description The Public Involvement Section is responsible for sharing information on the Project with stakeholders along the light rail alignment, documenting questions and concerns expressed by these stakeholders and ensuring that appropriate Project staff addresses them, and providing answers and feedback to those stakeholders on the outcome. At this stage of the Project, PI Area Coordinators are working with stakeholders in their respective line sections to provide the latest information on the design plans with regard to right-of-way requirements, traffic circulation, landscaping, and locations for traction power substations and signal houses. They are also sharing information on business assistance programs with the owners and managers of businesses located along the light rail corridor. Progress x Construction in all five Line Sections continues to progress and Public Involvement Staff continues to meet and respond to various stakeholders addressing their concerns with construction. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE x Order and delivery of Courtesy Signage Program continues in all Line Sections. Through September, 366 signs and 277 banners (643 totals) have been issued for businesses in all five Line Sections. The following table illustrates the current distribution for this program: METRO Construction Signage/Banner Program Overall Distribution Line Section Line Section One (LS1) Line Section Two (LS2) Line Section Three (LS3) Line Section Four (LS4) Line Section Five (LS5) Totals Page 23 Signs Banners Total 24 62 160 29 91 366 52 53 54 32 86 277 76 115 214 61 177 643 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT METRO Business Outreach Program The following is a break down of Phoenix business outreach statistics as of October 1, 2006: x METRO Max Program Participants – 129 businesses x Construction Signage Program – 643 Total (366 signs and 277 banners) x Management Technical Assistance (MTA) Program – 197 businesses x ASU Market Needs Assessment - 90 businesses (78 Complete / 12 In-Progress) x SELF Seminars / Micro Loan Assistance – 22 Businesses x SBDC One-on-One Consultation - 15 Businesses x Prestamos – Chicanos Por La Causa – 2 Businesses COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARDS (CAB) - Meetings are scheduled on a monthly basis to evaluate the contractor’s efforts to go “above and beyond” the contract specifications during light rail construction. LS-1 x LS 1 conducted its Community Advisory Board (CAB) meeting on Tuesday September 12th, at AmeriSchools Academy. CAB Members welcomed a new member to the group: Terri Schouten representing Medlock Place Neighborhood Association. METRO’s, Al Field, Utility Coordinator, presented an overview of the third party utility work occurring in Line Section 1. He highlighted what has and has not been completed and the timeframe for upcoming work. After the overview, Kiewit staff briefed the board on the upcoming restriction/closure of 19th Avenue and Camelback. Member discussed business losses since construction began. Board member Dan Abrams suggested CABs work together to petition the county for a tax break during construction. An overview of METRO’s and City of Phoenix’s business outreach programs will be presented at the October meeting. Kiewit received an overall rating of 100 percent, for their effort for going “above and beyond” the contract specifications. The next LS 1 CAB meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 10th. LS-2 x LS 2 held their monthly meeting Tuesday September 19th, at Brophy College Preparatory. CAB members welcomed two new members to the group: Bruce Kern representing Carnation Neighborhood Association and Chris Bianco representing Pane Bianco/ Lux Coffee Shop/ Passage Boutique/ Central Pawn Shop. Members of the community voiced concerns with the closure at the Grand Canal Bridge, notification, and the verbiage and placement of variable message boards. METRO’s Resident Engineer for LS 2, Matt McMenamin and Page 24 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Herzog’s Project Manager, Pat Gray explained the process of welding rail while video taken of Herzog’s welding activities was presented. Members asked questions regarding how the rail will be transferred from the yard to its final location. Herzog received and overall rating of 90 percent. The next LS 2 CAB meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 17th. LS-3 x LS 3 held its monthly meeting on Tuesday, September 12th, 2006. Members of the community addressed the CAB on various construction-related issues and conditions, such as increased crime and transients in the eastern part of the line section; access issues at a few crosswalks; notification of work and access to parking issues at the Post Office. Archer Western Contractors (AWC) delivered their contractor presentation, highlighting the progress and successes that they have achieved during the last month, and described future track work timelines for each segment. The presentation also included a list of future intersection closures. AWC received and overall rating of 70 percent. The next LS 3 CAB meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 10th in the METRO Board Room. LS-4 x LS 4 held their monthly CAB Meeting on Wednesday, September 13th, at Papago Buttes Corporate Plaza. Mr. Patrick Fuller, METRO’s General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Project Manager, provided an overview on traffic signals and operations of the signal control. He explained “predictive priority” and how the traffic signals will respond to the transit vehicle. Mr. Erik Yingling, Project Manager for SSWJV, reviewed the contractor presentation. He presented photos of the yard leads, of crews pouring track (he noted they are pouring 700 to 1,000 feet of track a week now), and of sidewalk, curb and gutter grading. He said work is continuing for the station at Priest and explained “bathtub” track (special track) so the light rail vehicle can move in and out of the MSF building. He noted advanced utilities are heading west and also explained upcoming traffic plans for September to mid-November. The LS 4 CAB gave a recommendation of 100 percent of the incentive available to Sundt/Stacy and Witbeck Joint Venture, for going “above and beyond” the contract specifications for the month. The City of Tempe reminded CAB members about the unveiling and lighting of the Tempe Town Lake Bridge on December 9, 2006. LS 4’s next CAB meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 11th at Papago Buttes Corporate Center @ 3 p.m. LS-5 x LS 5 CAB conducted it’s meeting on Thursday, September 14th, at the Escalante Community Center. CAB Members requested that an Action Plan for exit surveys be developed by METRO to ensure that mitigating concerns are addressed by the Contractor. CAB Member Ray Devine request additional notification for Victory Acres and Escalante neighborhoods regarding existing and upcoming the road. A recommendation of 100 percent of the incentive available to Sundt/Stacy and Witbeck Joint Venture was recommended by the LS5 CAB. The next LS5 Page 25 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT CAB meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 12th and has been relocated to the Escalante Community Center in Tempe @ 7:30 a.m. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Public Involvement activities remain on schedule. x Scheduled CAB Disbursement remains the same as the previous month: Total Available Incentive: $2,500,000.00 (10 Quarterly disbursements) Total Miles of Street with LRT: 23.53 miles Allocation per Mile: $106,247.34 Total CAB Disbursement through September remains at $ 836,473 ȱ ȱ Lineȱ Sectionȱ Totalȱ Amountȱ Availableȱ Availableȱ forȱAwardȱ toȱDateȱ Totalȱ Awardȱtoȱ Dateȱ LSȬ1ȱ LSȬ2ȱ LSȬ3ȱ LSȬ4ȱ LSȬ5ȱ $241,181.00 $317,680.00 $865,916.00 $567,361.00 $507,862.00 $ȱ48,236ȱ $ȱ95,304ȱ $346,366ȱ $283,680ȱ $152,358ȱ $ȱ48,236ȱ $ȱ92,127ȱ $277,093ȱ $266,659ȱ $152,358ȱ Issues and Solutions x None at this time. Page 26 %ȱ Awardȱ toȱ Dateȱ 100%ȱ 97%ȱ 80%ȱ 94%ȱ 100%ȱ SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 6. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Description Description It is the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program Section’s responsibility to administer the DBE participation requirements mandated by the Federal Government as a condition of the receipt of funding. These participation requirements are established by the City of Phoenix Equal Opportunity Department through the DBE Program Plan and are conveyed to METRO, as a sub-recipient, through the Civil Rights Office of the Public Transit Department. The DBE Program Section is responsible for ensuring that procurement and contract language, specific to the program, accurately reflects current requirements. During the procurement process, the DBE Program Section is responsible for responding to Requests for Information, presenting the DBE documentation requirements at pre-bid conferences, and conducting contractor and DBE subcontractor training sessions. At Bid Opening, the accuracy of DBE documentation submitted with each bid must be verified and each bidder must be found either responsive or non-responsive. Upon contract execution, pre-construction meetings are held and reporting/compliance requirements are addressed in more detail. Monthly utilization reports are submitted by each prime contractor and are reviewed by the DBE Program Section. Field issues and variances in the planned utilization are addressed on an on-going/as-needed basis. In order to ensure adequate DBE participation and the availability of DBE contractors, ongoing outreach activities are also conducted to facilitate networking of DBEs with prime contractors and to encourage DBE certification of non-certified small businesses. Progress x DBE participation based on amounts originally awarded is 13.84 percent, participation including change order work is at 14.31 percent and DBE’s have been paid 12.10 percent of construction dollars to date. Final proposed DBE participation levels will be established once the outstanding construction procurements of Park-N-Rides and Miscellaneous Construction have been completed. Procurement Activities x There are no DBE-related procurement activities this period. Outreach Activities x The DBE Outreach Advisory Committee did not meet during the month of September. The next meeting is scheduled for October 3rd to prepare for the Profiles in Diversity event October 5th. x A “Profiles in Diversity” event has been scheduled for October 5, 2006. This event will be held at the Wyndham from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. and coincide with the Page 27 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT United Latino Business Coalition Awards Banquet which will be held later than evening. The purpose of this event is to highlight the work of the small, minority, and women owned businesses that are contributing to METRO’s success. It will also recognize the efforts of our general contractors and consultants who continue to ensure that opportunities are provided. Formal invitations will be sent to METRO and participating City leadership, as well as prime contractors and consultants, the DBE Outreach Advisory Committee and their Boards of Directors, and DBE subcontractor and subconsultants who have contributed to the METRO program. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x DBE activities remain within budget and on schedule. Issues and Solutions x There are no issues this reporting period. Page 28 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT DBE Program Overview ȱ DBE Program Overview Estimated Construction Budget $498,000,000.00 Multi-Year DBE Project Goal (13.03%) $64,889,400.00 Original Contract Amounts Construction Contracts Issued to Date $663,455,568.42 Proposed DBE Participation to Date (13.84%) $91,807,371.97 Current Participation $672,950,569.38 Current Contract Total Current DBE Participation (14.31%) $96,297,908.63 Achieved to Date $251,369,956.14 Construction Contracts Paid to Date DBE Paid to Date (12.10%) $30,413,240.46 Page 29 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 7. System Safety and Security Description The System Safety and Security Department is responsible for establishing requirements for the identification, evaluation, and minimization of safety and security risks throughout all phases of the project, including revenue operations. The Section has developed and is administering provisions of the System Safety Program Plan, the System Security Program Plan, and the Safety and Security Certification Plan. Progress x Participated in commissioning efforts for the MSF. x Reviewed safety and security certification checklists for Line Sections 1 and 4. x Participated in events surrounding fatal collision involving a Tempe Police motorcycle officer in Line Section 5. x Completed set-up and implemented emergency notification process for construction accidents. x Resolved the pedestrian trespassing problem on the Town Lake Bridge x Incorporated PMOC safety and security consultant revisions of the Safety and Security Certification Plan. x Participated in the First Article Inspection of the Light Rail Vehicle at the Kinkisharyo plant in Osaka, Japan. x Participated in the FTA State Safety Oversight Workshop in Salt Lake City, Utah. x Continued with the process to develop light rail codes and ordinances for traffic, public conduct, and fare inspection enforcement with the City of Phoenix Law Department. x Conducted the Fire/Life Safety and Security Committee meeting. x Conducted the Safety and Security Certification Review Committee Committees meeting. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Safety and Security activities remain within budget on schedule. Issues and Solutions x None Page 30 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 8. Environmental Managementȱ Description During design and construction, the Environmental Manager is responsible for overseeing the compliance with federal and State environmental laws/regulations, the Project’s environmental/historic preservation obligations, implementing the requirements of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Record of Decision (ROD), and Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. The Environmental Manager is also responsible for review of all proposed Project changes to determine if the proposed change is consistent with the Project Definition as stated in the FEIS and to determine if the change presents any environmental impact not addressed in the FEIS/ROD. If a proposed change results in potential new impacts, the Manager shall document those impacts and secure FTA concurrence with the change, definition of impacts and proposed mitigation. Progress Archaeology x Provided archaeological monitoring in LS 2, 3, 4 and 5 for all ground disturbance activities. x As of September 29, 2006 we have discovered three cremations / 4 inhumations in Pueblo Grande (no new discoveries) and 35 cremations / 55 inhumations La Plaza –Tempe (one new discovery). Primary data recovery efforts have been in the Promenade area of the 5th and College Station. Archaeological recovery efforts continue to be adjusted to accommodate contractor’s priorities. Currently scheduled to complete data recovery in Veterans Way 3rd week in October. x ACS has provided 20 field archaeologist and two supervisors for excavation in the vicinity of Veterans Way. ACS has maintained schedule commitments. Field crews are being shifted to meet contractor’s priorities. Primary work was shifted from guideway in Veterans Way to Promenade to accommodate ASU request to improve drive access for large trucks to football stadium. Contaminated and Hazardous Materials x The Soil Monitoring and Management Plan is being implemented for excavation at Central and Camelback. To date no materials have demonstrated contamination levels above residential standards. All excavated materials suitable for backfill can be reused on site or disposed at a designated landfill. Because of low levels of contaminates we have reduced monitoring to spot checks. x Removed, disposed and closed underground storage tank (UST) at 22nd and Washington (LS 3). Page 31 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Investigated discovered 6 septic wells and tanks. Determined no environmental issues and requested contractor to over-excavate and backfill. Regulator Compliance x Conducted field observation of contractor compliance with dust control BMP. The Central and Camelback site is a potential trouble spot because of the multiple contractors working the site. AWC will maintain trackout and site watering until they are substantially complete with site excavation. Herzog must coordinate their excavation with AWC’ dust control. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis Archaeology Original Contract Value (CAC) Approved Change Orders Contract Value to date Invoiced as of Sept 29, 2006 Funds Available $1,500,064 $400,000 $1,900,064 ($2,752,985) ($852,921) Note: overage to ACS contract is being paid by CAC from the Construction Administration Services budget based on authorization from METRO. Overage costs to be included in forthcoming Change Order to CAC. Hazardous Materials Assessment (CAC) Original Contract Value $499,488 Contract Value to date $499,488 Invoiced as of Sept 29, 2006 ($218,566) Task orders issued not invoiced ($12,650) Funds Available $268,272 Page 32 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Remediation and Treatment Fund (METRO) Budget $1,004,000 Expended or Committed ($175,680) Data Recovery Report ($84,956) ERI ($90,724) Funds Available $828,320 Issues and Solutions x Issue: Suspicious soils generated at Central and Camelback may have to be transported to Beatty NV for disposal due to presence of chemicals associated with dry cleaning. Preliminary cost estimate for transport and disposal is $50,000 for an estimated 120 CY. Solution: METRO and COP to evaluate alternative means to dispose of materials due to the low levels of contaminates and to see if a local land fills will accept the materials. x Issue: Cost to complete archaeology monitoring and data collection (field work) is forecasted at $3,719,500 total cost. Solution: Costs to complete archaeology field work is included in the current CAC Forecast x Issue: Archaeology technical reports(s) must be completed for project close-out. Current ROM of cost is $1,500,000 to $3,000,000. Solution: We are preparing scope, schedule and cost estimate for this work. Costs will be funded from Misc. Construction budget or out of under utilized Archeology Investigations/Hazardous Material Removal budget. Page 33 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 9. Real Estate Description The LRT Project travels down main business arterials in the cities of Phoenix, Tempe and Mesa and approximately 783 parcels of property are affected. The number of rightof-way certifications required within this 20-mile corridor is in excess of 2,500. This number includes all easements required by the project, such as utility, irrigation, sidewalk, traffic, slope, landscape and temporary construction. Real Estate staff members from the project cities are responsible for obtaining all of the necessary property rights required to construct and operate the LRT system. Oversight and coordination of the cities’ activities is provided by METRO Real Estate staff. Progress x Four additional parcels came under City control since last month, and 9 additional parcels became available for construction. Presently, 96 percent of the required properties are now under city control and 90 percent of the properties are available for construction. Extensive coordination between METRO and City staff has enabled the project to obtain these properties in a manner sufficient to support construction. x In Line Section 1, 176 relocations have now been completed and only 3 remain. Three parcels came under City control for a total of 142. An additional five parcels were made available for construction for a total of 123. Line Section 1 contains a total of 153 parcels. x In Line Section 2, all relocations have now been completed. One parcel was made available for construction for a total of 75. Line Section 2 contains a total of 94 parcels. x In Line Section 3, only 5 relocations remain. A total of 258 parcels are now under City control and 241 parcels are available for construction. Line Section 3 contains a total of 260 parcels. x In Line Section 4, all of the relocations have now been completed. 108 parcels are now under City control and 103 parcels are available for construction. Line Section 4 contains a total of 109 parcels. x In Line Section 5, all of the relocations have now been completed. One parcel came under City control for a total of 162. Three parcels were made available for construction for a total of 161. Line Section 5 contains a total of 167 parcels. x In Line Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4; eighteen building cut and re-faces were identified; thirteen have been completed and 5 are currently underway. These building modifications require a structural engineering analysis, architectural and utility modifications, the procurement of relevant contractors and an extensive permitting process. Page 34 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x The City of Phoenix Ombudsman program continues to be a successful process for negotiating administrative settlements. As of the end of September, 243 ombudsman meetings have been held resulting in 216 settlements. This number represents a negotiated success rate of 89 percent. An updated Real Estate Acquisition Summary sheet is included at the end of this section. 5309 Budget $116,214,150 Available Contingency $ 19,570,480 Total $135,784,630 Spent To Date $114,572,085 Balance Available $21,212,545 CNPA $22,221,205 $ 1,753,931 $23,975,136 $17,318,039 $6,657,097 Total $138,435,355 $ 21,324,411 $159,759,766 $131,890,123 $27,869,643 Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Real Estate continues to be one of two key issues (utilities being the other) currently driving the project schedule and creating pressure on the ROD. The Cities are working diligently with METRO to improve and streamline processes wherever possible. x The overall real estate forecast is still within the budget and actual costs are within the budget plus contingency for the real estate contract unit. Issues and Solutions x Only 25 parcels remain that are not yet under city control, and only 80 are not yet available for construction, although only a small number of these parcels are negatively impacting the construction schedule. The energy of the project team is focused where it is needed most. In all line sections there are some parcels that remain unavailable for construction, but the outstanding parcels in Line Section 1 are of the highest priority. Page 35 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT CENTRAL PHOENIX / EAST VALLEY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION SUMMARY September 30, 2006 ACTIVITY 1 PHX 40 2 PHX 0 3 PHX 9 4 PHX 2 4 TEMPE 0 5 TEMPE 12 5 MESA 0 Totals 63 Partial Takes 113 94 251 106 1 109 46 720 Total Affected Parcels 153 94 260 108 1 121 46 783 Projected Relocations 179 29 36 28 0 40 0 312 Title Reports Completed 153 94 260 108 1 121 46 783 Full Takes Legals sent to City Appraisals Requested 153 94 260 108 1 121 46 783 153 94 260 108 1 121 46 783 Appraisals Completed 152 94 260 108 1 121 46 782 150 93 260 108 1 121 45 778 Offers Accepted 99 65 224 85 1 88 36 598 Escrow Closed Acquisition Complete 93 49 196 85 1 84 23 531 Condemnation Filed 26 14 25 11 0 29 13 118 OIP Received 19 8 22 9 0 29 13 100 ROE Signed 30 31 40 13 0 8 5 127 Relocations Underway 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 Relocations Completed 176 29 31 28 0 40 0 304 Parcels Under City Control 142 88 258 107 1 121 41 758 Parcels Available for Construction 123 75 241 102 1 121 40 703 Parcels Pending Release for Construction 19 13 17 5 0 0 1 55 Offers Made Page 36 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 10. Utilities Description The METRO Utility Manager is responsible for managing and overseeing the relocation of all privately owned utilities (irrigation, natural gas, nitrogen lines, fiber optics, power, private force mains, private communication lines, private irrigation lines, cable television, and telecommunications) necessary to allow LRT construction, including those with and without prior rights. Utilities with prior rights include SRP Power, SRP Irrigation, Qwest (local and long distance), Southwest Gas, WilTel, MCI and APS. Relocation of privately owned utilities is performed by private utility companies and their contractors, preferably prior to beginning LRT construction. Relocation of publiclyowned utilities is accomplished within the civil construction contracts by METRO contractors. Progress x Line Section 1 o Right-of-way availability continues to constrain utility and contractor activities. Acquisition progress is being made. The lack of access to properties at 19th Avenue and Camelback Road continue to restrict utility and contractor progress. o Previous Salt River Project Power (SRPP), claims of prior rights are disputed in several areas. SRPP has about 3 percent Prior Rights and 97 percent NonPrior Rights on 19th Avenue. Things are a bit more complicated on the Camelback Road where approximately 50 percent are Prior Rights but are still being disputed. o The City of Phoenix has allowed re-routing of bus traffic from 19th Avenue between Campbell and Missouri and from Camelback Road between 23rd Avenue and 15th Avenue. Bus traffic will skirt the 19th and Camelback intersection for approximately one year allowing construction in this intersection to take place with nighttime closures of the intersection. o Southwest Gas (SWG) has completed most of the relocation work on Camelback Road. The newly installed gas lines cannot be placed in service and the old lines removed until the utility easement on Fry’s property becomes available and SWG can work in that area. Qwest and SRPP cannot proceed until the SWG facility in the easement has been moved. o Salt River Project Irrigation (SRPI) continues with the installation of the irrigation structures on the project as right-of-way becomes available. o Salt River Project Power (SRPP) trenching on Camelback west from 9th Avenue has begun. Work has slowed for a private irrigation pipeline which must be removed. Page 37 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o The private irrigation work was pending resolution of a siphon condition at 15th Avenue. The resolution has been made and a connection is established to the SRPI structure at 15th Avenue. The conflicting private pipeline is now being removed. A siphon condition at 11th Avenue is being re-constructed to eliminate the siphon at the owner’s request. o Re-sequencing of all wet and dry utility relocation issues on 19th Avenue has been completed and final plans are in the field. o Twenty-four inch sewer construction will begin when SWG and SRPP trenching activities have moved far enough away to allow the excavation for the sewer to take place, currently estimated to be mid October. o Forty-eight inch water plans have been delivered to the Resident Engineer and the contractor has ordered pipe. o Southwest Gas continues relocations on 19th Avenue in multiple locations. o The contractor’s joint trenching for SRPP, Qwest and Cox continues. o Qwest needs right-of-way availability to install a manhole near Spectrum Mall property. o A private irrigation line crossing 19th at Montebello conflicts with the 45-inch water line that is not to be relocated since the re-sequencing. Alternatives continue to be investigated. x Line Section 2 o Utility conflicts and coordination issues are being addressed at bi-weekly meetings held in the field office. These meetings increase contractor communication, and utility company accountability. o Archer Western has completed placing APS and Qwest conduits at the Camelback Station site. Cox has started trenching and placing conduits. o The MCI Contractor continues to splice 432, 288 and 144 fiber optic cables. The LS2 Contractor activity has not been impacted. o APS acquired the two easements that were needed to relocate two major duct banks, one at Central Avenue and Thomas and the other at Central Avenue and Cambridge. o APS is currently pulling 12 kV cable at Central Avenue and Indian School Road. APS will need to remove the existing overhead which should be completed by mid October. o Salt River Project Water (Irrigation) will start placing pipe at Central Avenue and Mariposa mid-October of 2006. Page 38 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o The project team continues to work with APS to implement design modifications of street lights and Station Finishes platform power supply. The weekly coordination meeting that is held with APS representatives has been instrumental in facilitating the necessary changes of this work. x Line Section 3 o Utility conflicts and coordination issues are being addressed at bi-weekly meetings held in the field office. These meetings increase contractor communication, and utility company accountability. o Level 3 has completed relocation of duct bank and manholes at 24th Street, 22nd Street, 18th Street, and 17th Street and Washington. o The City of Phoenix – ITD has completed their relocation of manholes and lowering of the duct bank in several areas. o AWC and METRO continue to meet with APS on a weekly basis to confirm revenue service design. o The project team continues to work with APS to implement design modifications as development pressures increase within the downtown area. The weekly coordination meeting that is held with APS representatives has been instrumental in facilitating the necessary changes of this work. o APS and Qwest continue their relocations at 23rd Street and Jefferson Street. Relocations are to be completed by mid November. x Line Section 4 o Utility conflicts and coordination issues are being addressed on an as-needed basis. These meetings increase contractor communication, and utility company accountability. o APS still needs to demo overhead facilities, and remove power poles on Washington Street between 32nd Street and 30th Street. o Southwest Gas needs to install several test points at SR143 and Washington. x Line Section 5 o Resolutions to utility issues are addressed weekly in the LS5 Utilities Coordination meeting. o SRP irrigation plans were modified at Rural and Tyler. The siphon was reduced at the request of METRO. The design would reduce the construction time frame in half. METRO also requested the same for Price Freeway and Apache Boulevard to a minimum depth that will allow SRP to expedite their work and avoid a major Qwest relocation. Page 39 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o SRP Electric continues to trench and install street lights. The SRP electrical crossing at McClintock and Apache Boulevard is to be completed by mid October. o If the LS5 contract is to be completed by the Master Schedule dates, then all advanced utility contracts need to be accelerated. The following dates are required for Salt River Project Power to complete their work and SRPP needs to accelerate the following jobs: ƒ SRP Job No: JJC-5006, KJC-5010, KJC-3008 - McClintock to River to be completed by October 6, 2006 ƒ SRP Job No: SRP KJC-5012, KJC-3006 - Price to Tempe Canal to be completed by November 11, 2006 ƒ SRP Job No: SRP KJC-5011, JJC-5008, KJC-3011 - River to Price to be completed by December 31, 2006. ƒ SRP Job No: SRP KEC-5000, JEC-5000 – Roosevelt to Dobson to be completed by January 31, 2007 ƒ SRP Job No: SRP KEC-5001, JEC-5001 - Dobson to Sycamore to be completed by February 28, 2007 o The LS5 Contractor is to start the 24-inch casing under the Union Pacific Railroad mid October. o The Union Pacific Railroad needs to relocate a signal and a communication cabinet. Traction Power Substations x APS has started defining electrical easements that are still needed for Traction Power Substations. No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 15. x SRP has started defining their electrical easements. To expedite SRP Easements are being survey by SRP which should expedite the Legal and Exhibits for Traction Power Substations. No. 1, 2, 9, 12, 13 and 14. New Electric Services Accounts x APS electrical services for METRO have been established. x SRP electrical services are being established for METRO. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Costs incurred to-date for prior rights utilities are within the Utility Budget. We are concerned that the budget for SRP Irrigation and SRP Power will run over budget due to material costs and the fact that traffic control costs have increased. Page 40 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Utility relocation continues to be one of two key issues driving the project schedule. Lack of available Right-of-Way and delays in completion of utility design have affected contractor construction schedules. METRO is working with the cities, the utility companies and the Contractors to develop strategies to streamline processes provide additional resources and create opportunities for work-around so that impacts to the Contractors’ schedules are minimized. Issues and Solutions x Weekly meetings continue to address any conflicts and coordination issues. Meetings are being held at the field office to better effect contractor communication with utilities as well as make the utilities accountable x Define APS and SRP Electric easements for the TPSS Site number 1 thru number 12 and number 14. x Line Section 1 - SRP Irrigation easements have been defined but not all have been obtained. Several SRP Power easements are being revised due to METRO design revisions and new development projects. Parcel acquisitions and cost to cure items have been prioritized so as to coincide with the contractor’s construction schedule and utility needs. METRO currently needs the access to Walgreen’s, Fry’s, Osco, and other parcels to allow the third party utilities and contract work to continue. x Line Section 2 – MCI still needs to splice their fiber, which is a major process. Getting a window to do the cut over from primary customers has been a major challenge to MCI. x Line Section 3 – Level 3 need to relocate several manholes. The contractor is working around this area to mitigate delays. x Line Section 4 – METRO must ensure that all utility relocations within the test track are complete. x Line Section 5 – SRP irrigation relocation, SRP Power, Qwest and Cox still hinders the LS5 Contractor. Page 41 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Construction Photographs SRP-Power under grounding 12 kV on Camelback Road in Line Section 1 SWG relocation 8-inch High Pressure Gas Main on 19th Avenue in Line Section 1 Page 42 Prior R ights U tility C ostStatus Federal5309 Project Percent Line Section 1 Line Section 2 Line Section 3 Line Section 4 Line Section 5 M aintenance Storage Facility Tow n Lake B ridge B udget Earned $3,685,390 $1,775,000 $3,071,676 $4,425,236 $7,010,760 $320,230 $1,150,000 $2,062,424 $1,265,000 $2,525,925 $3,954,688 $3,944,528 $320,230 $1,150,000 $2,205,797 $89,936 $406,686 $2,003,401 $4,083,134 $397,876 $824,097 $6,639,507 $1,775,000 $3,900,000 $5,126,806 $7,790,372 $397,876 $1,216,282 $21,438,292 $15,222,795 $10,010,927 $26,845,843 0.0% $1,185,480 $0 $0 $0 67.3% $22,623,772 $15,222,795 $10,010,927 $26,845,843 56.0% 71.3% 82.2% 89.4% 56.3% 100.0% 100.0% Sub Total C ontingency TotalPrior R ights U tilities Page 43 C ostto D ate Forecast SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 11. Architecture Public Art ȱ Description Public art projects will be a part of all Station Finishes listed in Section 4.1.3 with the exception of the platform at 19th Avenue and Camelback. Additional artworks will be placed at the 19th Avenue and Camelback Park-and-Ride and at the Tempe Town Lake Bridge. Artworks will include stand alone sculptures, integrated architectural finishes, entryway canopies, lighting, paving and landscaping elements. Artists will install their work in conjunction with the Station Finishes, Park-and-Ride, and Town Lake Bridge construction schedule. Progress x Tempe Town Lake Bridge artist Buster Simpson installed his Trialogue sculpture on the south beach. The concrete low wall was installed in concert with the Rio Salado/Tempe Art Center walkway. Buster will install his porcelain steel panels along the south wall in October or November of this year. Page 44 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Public Art activities remain on schedule and within budget. Issues and Solutions x Continuing to monitor contract schedule issues. Page 45 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Station Finishes ȱ Description The Station Finishes (SF) contract includes twenty-seven stations, four transit centers and installation of art pieces by twenty-seven artists. Amenities within the fully accessible stations include: shading trellises with overhead canopies, irrigated trees and landscape, patron seating and leaning rails, drinking fountains, map cases, directional signage and trash receptacles. Types of art pieces include stand-alone sculptures, paving treatments, lighting treatments and integrated art within the station structures. The SF architects prepared the construction drawings in five separate packages that correspond to each civil line section. These documents along with an art reference volume have been combined together and are currently under construction. System elements that are located in the station areas include: surveillance cameras (CCTV), a public address system (PA), emergency call boxes (ECB), variable message boards (VMB) and automated ticket vending machines (TVM). Page 46 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Progress x The Permit for Civil work was issued by the City of Phoenix for the 44th Street/Washington Transit Center thereby allowing underground and surface construction to commence with site clearing, grubbing, and installation of some underground utilities. Additional permits for constructing all remaining elements at this facility were issued in late September 2006. x At the Mariposa Street Cul-De-Sac site, Herzog Construction is currently on the street installing water lines. Redesign of the SRP irrigation line is now being priced by the Line Section 2 Contractor, and this work has impacted Archer Western (Station Finishes). When Herzog completes the irrigation installation, Archer Western will get back onto Mariposa Street and complete all remaining new curb, gutter, paving and miscellaneous utilities. x Construction is continuing on the physical links between couplet stations at Van Buren/1st Avenue and Central into the Central Station Bus Transit Center. This work includes the extension of platform/entry foundations which were turned over to the Station Finishes Contractor from Line Section 3 along with walkways, retaining walls and rework to the retention basins. x A punch list was developed by Archer Western (Station Finishes) for the Van Buren/1st Avenue Station Foundation which is a requirement for turn-over of foundations by the Line Section Contractor. This will serve as a protocol of acceptance with other stations as they come on line from METRO Civil contracts. Line Section 3 has turned over seven foundations to Archer Western (Station Finishes) to begin the acceptance process. x Once steel is fabricated, above-ground station structural construction at platforms and transit centers will begin by late 2006/early 2007. See Issues and Solutions below. x A cost proposal (Change Notice No. 30) was received from Archer Western for ASU design additions at four METRO platforms in downtown Phoenix and Tempe. A meeting was scheduled for October 4, 2006 to finalize scope and budget of this work with reimbursement by ASU to METRO. x All review comments were received by METRO from the City of Mesa Building Safety Division for the Sycamore/Main Transit Center construction permit. A second submittal of all documents is scheduled for early October 2006 with an anticipated permit ready for pick-up by Archer Western at the end of this month. x The second Station Finishes Partnering Session between METRO, Archer Western and City staff is scheduled for October 12, 2006. x All outstanding City of Phoenix permits are ready for pick-up by Archer Western except at Montebello/19th Avenue Transit Center. See Issues and Solutions below. Page 47 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x METRO and Archer Western Contractors are in negotiation to finalize the revised Station Finishes construction schedule as determined by Change Order No. 3. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Issues and Solutions x Right of Entry for Spectrum Mall has been re-negotiated into a purchase agreement by the City of Phoenix to provide needed Right of Way for the METRO LRT. However, the final marked-up legal agreement has still not yet been signed by either party, but anticipated kick-off remains expected for October 2006. This has continued to delay Station Finishes construction and receipt of a building permit for this site. x The First Article of Inspection for Station Steel columns was rejected by METRO in September 2006. Archer Western Contractors is resolving the problem by hiring a new local steel fabricator to produce this work within their revised contract schedule. Page 48 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT 3.2.1 Station Finishes Steve G ottesm an A rcher W estern C ontractors B ob Yantzer D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentA rchitect: A ugust31,2006 D ata Through: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 5309 $52,985,000 $0 $0 $52,985,000 $3,703,701 $3,309,002 $3,304,699 $49,680,301 $0 $52,985,000 6.2% 7.0% 6.2% 0.89 1.00 $546,000 $546,000 100.0% C N PA $9,988,000 $50,000 $0 $10,038,000 $655,686 $0 $457,000 $9,581,000 $0 $10,038,000 4.6% 6.5% 0.0% 0.00 N /A $371,603 $321,603 86.5% Total $62,973,000 $50,000 $0 $63,023,000 $4,359,387 $3,309,002 $3,761,699 $59,261,301 $0 $63,023,000 6.0% 6.9% 5.3% 0.76 0.88 $917,603 $867,603 94.6% N /A $0 $0 $52,985,000 $386,880 $781,345 $0 $52,985,000 $0 $52,985,000 0.0% 0.7% 1.5% 2.02 #N /A N /A $50,000 $0 $10,038,000 $114,561 $409,512 $49,500 $9,988,500 -$50,000 $9,988,000 0.5% 1.1% 4.1% 3.57 N /A N /A $50,000 $0 $50,000 $501,441 $1,190,857 $49,500 $62,973,500 -$50,000 $62,973,000 0.1% 0.8% 1.9% 2.37 24.06 M onthly Perform ance M easures Total= x Budgeted/ Planned $63. 9 70. 0 Total ForecastatC om pletion $0.9 $0.0 Plann 60. 0 $0.1 Total= $63.0 98.6% of C ontingency Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O B udget 63.0 0.9 63.0 0.1 4.4 C om pleted W ork to D ate 3.3 C ont 50. 0i 0.9 C ontingency Expended D ollars in M illions 0.0 0.1 40.0 $63.0 $63.0 30.0 20.0 75.9% of Planned 94.6% R em aining 10.0 $4.4 $3.3 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate Station Finishes C ontractthrough Septem ber '06 Page 49 $0.9 C ontingency Available $0.1 C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 12. Facilities Line Section 1 ȱ Description Line Section 1 is 2.27 miles in length, and begins on 19th Avenue south of Bethany Home Road to a point west of the Central Avenue and Camelback Road Station. The construction work in this contract includes demolition, relocation of public utilities, roadway and drainage modifications, systems ductbank installation to the substation site interface, station foundations, signing and marking, irrigation, landscaping, et cetera. There are three stations in Line Section 1. They are at 19th Avenue and Montebello, 19th Avenue and Camelback Road, and 7th Avenue and Camelback Road. Page 50 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Progress x Kiewit continues water line installation, storm drain and sewer line installation, private irrigation, street light installation, traffic signal work at intersections, landscape irrigation, utility removals and miscellaneous demolition, roadway excavation, milling and plaiting, paving pipe trenches, man holes / stand pipes installation, ACP removal at various places along the South Side of Camelback Road. Some work is being performed at night. Private irrigation tie-in work utilizing “mini dry-ups” continue to be coordinated well between KWC and Salt River Project Irrigation. Kiewit has begun their part of the SRP joint trench and they have also begun duct bank, curb, gutter and sidewalk work this month. They plan to begin work for the trackway and restart the catenary pole foundations installation next month. x Southwest Gas (SWG) has completed nearly all the gas line relocation work on Camelback Road; but, they can not put the new line in service until the utility easement for the “Payless” part of Fry’s parcel take is finalized. They continue to work on 19th Avenue with two subcontractors; one subcontractor is working from Bethany Home Road south and the other subcontractors is working from Camelback Road north. Periodic line drops in the 19th Avenue and Camelback intersection are being performed at night. x The joint trench work on Camelback continues with Salt River Project Power (SRPP) that now has two subcontractors working. Salt River Project Irrigation (SRPI) continues with the installation of the irrigation structures on the project. x Traffic control has been seamlessly combined between all participants on the project and continues to be successful with few formal complaints from the various stake holders or traveling public. In early October Kiewit plans on restricting traffic flow on both Camelback and 19th Avenue to one lane in each direction and the City of Phoenix (COP) has agreed to allow pre-approved night time full closures of the Camelback and 19th Avenue intersection. x Sidewalk, curb and gutter installation has started on the south side of Camelback Road between Central and 7th Avenue. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x A Mitigation Plan is being prepared to recover lost time once 19th Avenue work is re-started and the acquisition of these parcels has been completed. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Page 51 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Issues and Solutions x Real Estate, Cost-To-Cure (CTC), and SRPP Utility Easements continue to be a concern. There are several parcels on LS 1 that are not yet available or have CTC issues. And, there are several SRPP Utility Easements not yet obtained. The Contractor and third party utilities know of the lack of these key work areas and are amending their work plans as much as possible, but crucial systems tieins can not be finished until the parcels and easements are available. METRO and COP continue to strengthen their efforts to obtain the remaining parcels and easements. Construction Photos KWC Crews Removing SRP Irrigation Line on 19th Avenue KWC Excavating for the New SRP 30-inch RGRCP Across 17th Avenue Fry’s Parking Lot Storm Drain in Conflict with the New SRP at 415+87 KWC Installing the New 30-inch SRP at 415+50 Page 52 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT KWC Backfilling the Open Excavation Material Removed at 450+75 RT Page 53 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT 3.1.1 Line Section 1 A lvin Livingstone K iew itW estern C o. B illB lane D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: Septem ber 1,2006 D ata Through: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $50.4 Total= $49.2 x Budgeted/Planned 60.0 Total ForecastatC om pletion 5309 $37,951,658 $539,865 $2,500,000 $40,991,523 $13,971,583 $9,705,359 $9,714,219 $31,277,304 $195,538 $41,187,061 23.7% 34.1% 23.7% 0.69 1.00 $1,963,056 $1,423,191 72.5% C N PA $10,533,342 -$210 $0 $10,533,132 $4,577,013 $1,439,398 $1,432,517 $9,100,615 $0 $10,533,132 13.6% 43.5% 13.7% 0.31 1.00 $44,811 $45,021 100.5% Total $48,485,000 $539,655 $2,500,000 $51,524,655 $18,548,596 $11,144,757 $11,146,736 $40,377,919 $195,538 $51,720,193 21.6% 36.0% 21.6% 0.60 1.00 $2,007,867 $1,468,212 73.1% N /A $0 $0 $40,991,523 $1,893,441 $534,846 $543,706 $40,447,817 $139,538 $41,131,061 1.3% 4.6% 1.3% 0.28 0.98 N /A -$210 $0 $10,533,132 $515,129 $18,110 $0 $10,533,132 -$9,300 $10,523,832 0.0% 4.9% 0.2% 0.04 #N /A N /A -$210 $0 $51,524,655 $2,408,570 $552,956 $543,706 $50,980,949 $130,238 $51,654,893 1.1% 4.7% 1.1% 0.23 1.02 M onthly Perform ance M easures 97.5% of C ontingency Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O B udget 48.5 2.0 48.5 0.5 0.2 $0.2 Plann $2.0 50.0 C om pleted W ork to D ate 18.5 C onti C ontingency Expended D ollars in M illions 11.1 $0.5 2.0 0.5 40.0 30.0 $48.5 $48.5 60.0% of Planned 20.0 73.1% R em aining $18.5 10.0 $11.1 $2.0 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to D ate C om pleted W ork to D ate LS1 C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 54 C ontingency Available $0.5 C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Line Section 2 ȱ Description Line Section 2 begins at a point on Camelback Road just west of the Central Avenue/Camelback Road Station, and continues south on Central Avenue to a point approximately 200 feet north of the Central Avenue/McDowell Road intersection. The construction work in this contract includes demolition, relocation of public utilities, roadway improvements, drainage modifications, systems ductbank installations, station foundations, installation of systems ductbank and conduits, streetlights, traffic signals, OCS pole foundations, preparation of trackbed, and installation of embedded track. It also includes replacement of the Grand Canal Bridge on Central Avenue. This Line Section will have six stations at the following locations: Central/Camelback, Central/Campbell, Central/Indian School, Central/Osborn, Central/Thomas and Central/Encanto. Page 55 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Progress x Herzog continues to install various underground utilities throughout the project. Many have been installed and good progress is being made. They have completed the pressure and bacterial test for several fire lines and hydrants and put these lines back in service. They are continuing the installation of various storm drain laterals, sewer, water and laterals, fire hydrants and electrical conduits throughout the project. x Guideway excavation continues this month opposite Central High School and Campbell. This includes excavation for Campbell Station foundations. x Rail welding (flash-butt factory welds) has begun this month we have received most of the LS2 rail. x The sidewalk area north and south of the Grand Canal Bridge and along the easterly and westerly sides of Central opposite Central High School are now complete, less some quality rework. Herzog has constructed the easterly half of the Grand Canal Bridge, thus completing the bridge. Some bridge wingwalls, joint work and backfill remain to be done. Traffic is currently using the new westerly half of the bridge in both directions. Work continues this month at the Camelback Station Site and Herzog continues coordinating with Archer Western, Kiewit and other third party utilities. Utility installations and relocations are critical and require coordination between work scope by all the Contractors. x Light poles and traffic signal poles are being restored (or installed new), painted and placed on new foundations along the easterly half of Central Avenue. x Herzog continues potholing activities between Osborn and McDowell Road in preparation for the upcoming utility relocations. Off-set manholes for the storm drain access are being installed in this area. Work in this area will be limited due to upcoming events at the Heard and Art Museums. x No lost time injuries occurred this month. x Contractor received a 90 percent score on their Community Advisory Board (CAB) review this month. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Schedule impacts include conflicts with underground utilities and design changes. x METRO has issued several change notices to Herzog for pricing and credit. Several change orders are being performed on the job, mostly concerning utility work-a-rounds and design changes. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Page 56 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Issues and Solutions x Line Section 2 has all but 2 parcels under City control. There are no impacts to schedule at this time due to real estate. x Utility conflicts continue to occur. METRO is working diligently with Herzog to perform work-arounds and other mitigation processes as needed to keep on schedule. x Several major design adjustments, including protection of the 54-inch waterline at Indian School Road/Central, the 24-inch waterline at Osborn, and the private irrigation at Mariposa are being completed and should be implemented soon. Construction Photos Newly poured curb return at Minnezona. Stripping forms of the bridge barrier wall at GCB Page 57 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: 3.1.2 Line Section 2 A lvin Livingstone H erzog C ontracting C orporation M attM cM enam in D ata Through: A ugust31,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $58.3 x Budgeted/Planned 60.0 Total $3.1 ForecastatC om pletion Total= $56.4 $0.2 5309 C N PA/O ther Total $48,425,124 $6,762,248 $55,187,372 $806,743 $0 $806,743 $10,000 $162,317 $172,317 $49,231,867 $6,924,565 $56,166,432 $18,873,031 $4,380,346 $23,253,377 $9,945,962 $1,102,916 $11,048,878 $9,944,969 $1,104,781 $11,049,750 $39,286,898 $5,819,784 $45,106,682 $42,847 $143,885 $186,732 $49,231,867 $7,068,450 $56,300,317 20.2% 16.0% 19.7% 38.3% 63.3% 41.4% 20.2% 15.9% 19.7% 0.53 0.25 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 $3,050,401 $13,293 $3,063,694 $2,233,658 $13,293 $2,084,634 73.2% 100.0% 68.0% N /A $54,572 $0 $49,231,867 $2,129,496 $1,455,566 $1,452,790 $47,779,077 -$42,288 $49,189,579 3.0% 4.3% 3.0% 0.68 1.00 N /A $0 $9,550 $6,924,565 $1,448,693 -$88,351 $41,712 $6,882,853 $140,484 $7,065,049 0.6% 20.9% -1.3% N /A -2.12 N /A $54,572 $9,550 $56,156,432 $3,578,189 $1,367,215 $1,494,502 $54,661,930 $98,196 $56,254,628 2.7% 6.4% 2.4% 0.38 0.91 M onthly Perform ance M easures Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 96.7%C ont ofingency 55. 2 3.1 B udget 55.2 1.0 0.2 $1.0 Plann 50.0 C om pleted W ork to D ate 23.3 11.0 D ollars in M illions C onti C ontingency Expended 3.1 1.0 40.0 30.0 $55.2 $55.2 47.8% of Planned 68.0% R em aining 20.0 $23.3 10.0 $11.0 $3.1 $1.0 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to D ate C om pleted W ork to D ate LS2 C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 58 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Line Section 3 ȱ ȱ Description Line Section 3 is 4.29 miles in length with approximately eight miles of in-street track. It begins at Central Avenue and McDowell Road and extends south on Central Avenue to Portland Avenue where the line splits into single-track alignment on the one-way streets of Central Avenue and 1st Avenue. It continues south on one-way 1st Avenue to Jefferson Street and then east on one-way Jefferson Street to its end at 26th Street. It continues on one-way Central Avenue to Washington Street and then east on oneway Washington Street to 26th Street. The eastbound leg is on 1st Avenue and Jefferson Street and the westbound leg is on Washington Street and Central Avenue. The Section traverses downtown Phoenix crossing the Deck Park Bridge and passes near America West Arena, Bank One Ballpark, the Symphony Hall, Civic Plaza and Arizona Science Center. The work anticipated in this construction contract includes demolition, relocation of public utilities, corrosion control facilities, roadway and drainage modifications, station platform foundations, installation of systems duct bank and conduits, streetlights, traffic signals, OCS pole foundations, irrigation, landscaping, traffic signing, pavement Page 59 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT marking, preparation of track bed and installation of embedded track. It also includes modifications of existing structures at the Deck Park Bridge, Renaissance II Garage, Arizona Science Center/CPEG Pedestrian Bridge and ADOT I-10 Washington-Jefferson Interchange. The seven stations with 13 platforms located within Line Section 3 are McDowell Road/Central Avenue, Roosevelt Street/Central Avenue, Roosevelt Street/1st Avenue, Van Buren Street/Central Avenue, Van Buren Street/1st Avenue, Washington Street/Central Avenue, Jefferson Street/1st Avenue, 3rd Street/Washington Street, 3rd Street/Jefferson Street, 12th Street/Washington Street, 12th Street/Jefferson Street, 24th Street/Washington Street and 24th Street/Jefferson Street. For Right-of-Way availability and order of construction or sequencing, Line Section 3 has been divided into 15 segments. The segments are paired on the one-way street couplets with Segments 1 and 2 extending from Polk to Washington on Central and 1st Avenue, 3 and 4 from 1st Avenue to 3rd Street on Washington and Jefferson, 5 and 6 from 3rd Street to 9th Street on Washington and Jefferson, 7 and 8 from Portland to Polk on Central and 1st Avenue, 9 and 10 from 9th Street to 14th Street on Washington and Jefferson, 11 and 12 from 14th to 20th Street on Washington and Jefferson, 13 and 14 from 20th to 26th Street on Washington and Jefferson, and Segment 15 on Central Avenue from McDowell to Portland. Progress x Archer Western Contractors (AWC) is continuing utility construction in segments 2 through 14 installing storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water service. AWC is continuing to install traffic features and wiring on traffic signals in segments 1 through 15. Additionally, AWC is proceeding with OCS foundations, lighting conduits and foundations, irrigation as required along ROW and stations. x AWC is currently working day crews six days per week and night crews four to five nights a week. x AWC has completed placing the station foundation at Washington/24th Street and has started excavation of the 12th Street/Washington station. AWC encountered several third party utility conflicts during excavation of the Washington/3rd Street foundation and will cease work in this area until these utilities are relocated. x AWC is extending guideway placement from Segment 1 to Segment 7 (Central Polk to Portland) from Polk to McKinley. AWC is also has continued guideway placement on Jefferson to from 1st Street to 3rd Street, installed the pre-curve section of rail from Jefferson to 1st Avenue station and has completed guideway on Washington from Central to 1st Street. AWC has set rail and related system boxes at the contract match line to Line Section 4 east of 26th Street on Washington. x Level 3 has completed relocation of duct bank and manholes at 18th Street and 17th Street on Washington Street and has moved to Washington and 16h Street. Page 60 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT AWC and METRO continue to meet with APS to confirm design of revenue service and coordinate installation. x AWC has established six rail headings to provide schedule flexibility for the approximate 44,635 lf of guideway installation for this project. To date AWC has installed approximately 5500 lf of guideway (including direct fixation track). Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x AWC and METRO are in negotiations concerning the master schedule milestone revision change order. The interim progress schedule indicates the contractor has completed 35 percent of the work. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Issues and Solutions x Bi-weekly meetings continue to address any conflicts and coordination issues. Meetings are being held at the field office to better effect contractor communication with utilities as well as make the utilities accountable. x Weekly APS meetings are also continuing to better facilitate the revenue installation and expedite any required changes. x ROW acquisition is complete with several outstanding cost to cure items. Sterling Hotel being the only property with ROW impact. Construction Photos Exposed Aggregate at the US Airway Center Plaza Driveway at the Courthouse Parking Lot Page 61 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Curb and Gutter at Jefferson Between 24th and 25th Street 24th Street and Washington Station Page 62 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: 3.1.3 Line Section 3 W illiam G ustafson A rcher W estern W illiam A tesis D ata Through: A ugust26,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 5309 $79,248,617 $2,032,281 $23,831 $81,304,729 $42,500,596 $23,378,840 $23,397,036 $57,907,693 $118,521 $81,423,250 28.8% 52.3% 28.8% 0.55 1.00 $5,648,232 $3,639,782 64.4% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) N /A $167,899 $0 $81,304,729 $3,554,639 $1,852,654 $1,850,363 $79,454,366 -$57,517 $81,247,212 2.3% 4.4% 2.3% 0.52 1.00 $6,398,232 $6,230,333 97.4% C N PA Total $19,452,352 $98,700,969 $25,285 $2,057,566 $432,649 $456,480 $19,910,286 $101,215,015 $13,880,001 $56,380,597 $7,685,970 $31,064,810 $7,686,743 $31,083,779 $12,223,543 $70,131,236 $282,233 $400,754 $20,192,519 $101,615,769 38.6% 30.7% 69.7% 55.7% 38.6% 30.7% 0.55 0.55 1.00 1.00 $402,730 $6,050,962 $381,610 $3,536,916 94.8% 58.5% N /A N /A $0 $167,899 $43,404 $43,404 $19,910,286 $101,215,015 $610,810 $4,165,449 $763,200 $2,615,854 $762,104 $2,612,467 $19,148,182 $98,602,548 $78,376 $20,859 $19,988,662 $101,235,874 3.8% 2.6% 3.1% 4.1% 3.8% 2.6% 1.25 0.63 1.00 1.00 $1,231,072 $7,629,304 $1,187,668 $7,418,001 96.5% 97.2% M onthly Perform ance M easures Total= x Budgeted/Planned $104.8 120. 0 Total ForecastatC om pletion D ollars in M illions $6.1 Plann 100.0 C om pleted W ork to D ate Total= $101.6 $0.4 Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 97.0% of C ontingency 98.7 6.1 B udget 98.7 2.5 0.4 56.4 31.1 $2.5 C onti C ontingency 80.0 Expended 6.1 2.5 60.0 $98.70 54.9% of Planned $98.70 58.5% R em aining 40.0 $56.38 20.0 $31.06 $6.05 $2.51 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate LS3 C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 63 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Line Section 4 ȱ ȱ Description Line Section 4 guideway is approximately 5.4 miles, from 26th and Washington Street to the northern limit of Tempe Town Lake. The work includes demolition, relocation of water and sewer lines, roadway improvements, drainage modifications, sidewalk and landscaping, streetlights, installation of traffic control signals, LRT station platform foundations, systems duct bank and conduits, OCS pole foundations, preparation of the tracked and sub drains, installations of track and special trackwork including the portion of the LRT Tempe Town Lake Bridge, and replacement of the Washington Street Bridge over the Grand Canal. There are three light rail stations located on Washington Street at 38th Street, 44th Street and Priest Drive. Progress x Lakeside Drive to Center Parkway: No activities this month. x Center Parkway to 56th Street: Continued guide-way construction adjacent to and west of the Priest Station; excavated, placed reinforcement, anchor bolts and poured the station platform foundation; continued guide-way construction and Page 64 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT embedded track way pours at various locations between Desert Drive and 56th Street. x 56th Street to 48th Street: Continued to place guide-way slabs for the left and right tracks from 56th Street to SR202 and west of 51st Street to 50th Street; completed the underground combined systems duct bank work at the yard lead; completed the installation of the 4-5/4-6 and the 4-9/4-10 single crossovers as well as the 4-5/4-6 switch machines all to the MSF yard lead; completed pouring the 4-7 and 4-8 turnout bath tubs and installing the isolation membrane with protection board; placed remaining curbs/gutters, sidewalks, driveways, catch basins, track drainage and AC base pavement between 51st and 48th Streets and switched vehicular traffic to the far south side of Washington Street. x 48th Street to 44th Street: Completed installing the fiber optic duct bank conduits and communication vault into the Pueblo Grande Museum; continued grading and replacement of curb/gutter and sidewalks on the south side of Washington Street from 48th Street to SR143; fine graded the guide-way subgrade and pulled in rail strings; assembled the overhead sign structure in front of the Pueblo Grande Museum. x 44th Street to 40th Street; placed curbs/gutters, driveways, sidewalks on the south side of Washington Street from the Washington Street bridge over the Grand Canal to 40th Street; completed the sanitary manholes and sanitary line reconstruction at the 40th Street intersection. x 40th Street to 26th Street: Continued the installation of advanced utility crossings under the LRV guide-way from west of the 36th to 32nd Streets; continued the underground electrical conversion connections to various parcels; began preparing for the 32nd Street intersection closure for the infrastructure replacement and intersection reconstruction. x Washington Street Bridge: Cast the south parapet wall and south sidewalk. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x The contract schedule is now divided into four milestones. The METRO targets for Milestones 1 and 2 have been integrated with follow-on contractors for TES and S&C to determine the earliest possible start for TES, S&C and Station Finishes in the test track area. There is no forecasted impact to the start of testing in April 2007. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Page 65 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Issues and Solutions x The re-facing of the buildings that intrude into the new right-of-way is almost complete. Construction Photographs Guideway placement west of 56th Street 4-5/4-6 Single Crossover Construction Forming 4-8 Turnout Bath Tub to MSF Yard Lead Track Placement of curb/gutter east of 48th Street Page 66 SEPTEMBR 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 3.1.4 Line Section 4 A vrum Loew enstein Sundt/Stacey W itbeck M arty Spong D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: D ata Through: A ugust31,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $60.6 Total= $58.3 5309 $47,869,894 $3,829,948 $266,946 $51,966,788 $31,365,035 $23,442,571 $25,185,313 $26,781,475 $21,288 $51,988,076 48.5% 60.4% 45.1% 0.75 0.93 $5,662,190 $2,077,900 36.7% C N PA $6,880,853 -$425,903 $1,465,327 $7,920,277 $6,078,361 $4,712,346 $5,089,896 $2,830,381 $352,474 $8,272,751 64.3% 76.7% 59.5% 0.78 0.93 $172,633 $172,633 100.0% Total $54,750,747 $3,404,045 $1,732,273 $59,887,065 $37,443,396 $28,154,917 $30,275,209 $29,611,856 $373,762 $60,260,827 50.6% 62.5% 47.0% 0.75 0.93 $5,834,823 $2,250,533 38.6% N /A -$103,560 $113,000 $51,966,788 $1,934,465 $1,577,048 $2,316,360 $26,781,475 -$20,162 $29,077,673 4.5% 3.7% 3.0% 0.82 0.68 N /A -$12,415 $24,279 $7,920,277 $0 $0 $0 $2,830,381 -$819,036 $2,011,345 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #D IV/0! #D IV/0! N /A -$115,975 $137,279 $59,887,065 $1,934,465 $1,577,048 $2,316,360 $29,611,856 -$839,198 $31,089,018 3.9% 3.2% 2.6% 0.82 0.68 M onthly Perform ance M easures 96.3% of C ontingency Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O B udget 54.8 5.8 x Budgeted/Planned 0r Total70. C ont ForecastatC om pletion 54.8 3.6 0.0 $0.0 Planned 60.0W $5.8 C om pleted W ork to D ate 37.4 28.2 $3.6 D ollars in M illions C ontingenc 50. 0 Expended C onti ngency 5.8 3.6 40.0 30.0 75.1% of Planned $54.8 $54.8 20.0 $37.4 $28.2 38.6% R em aining 10.0 $5.8 $3.6 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork to D ate D ate LS4 C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 67 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Line Section 5 ȱ Description Line Section 5 is 4.7 miles in length and begins at the 1st Street grade crossing in Tempe and progresses down the former Creamery Branch of the UPRR in Tempe across Mill Avenue and behind the Mission Palms resort. From there, it runs along Stadium Drive across Rural Road down Terrace Road to Apache Boulevard. It then proceeds east on Apache Boulevard and enters the City of Mesa, where it terminates in the vicinity of Main Street and Sycamore near the Tri-city Mall property. The construction work in this contract includes demolition, relocation of public utilities, roadway and drainage modifications, station platform foundations, installation of systems duct bank and conduits, street lights, traffic signals, OCS pole foundations, preparation of track bed, and installation of embedded track. Stations are located in Tempe at 3rd and Mill, 5th and College, University and Rural, Apache and Dorsey, Apache and McClintock, Apache and Smith-Martin, Apache and Price Freeway; and in Mesa at Main and Sycamore. Page 68 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Progress x The Contractor completed Retaining Wall 5 in the parking lot area from Ash Avenue toward First Street, and began guide-way excavation from First Street eastward. x The Contractor installed traffic signal foundations and poles at 3rd Street intersections at Ash and Mill Avenues, and began guide-way excavation along 3rd Street. x The Contractor completed Retaining Wall One, located along the Creamery Route, and began construction of Retaining Wall Seven. x The Contractor continued grading the Promenade area westward from Sun Devil Stadium, placing pavers at the Southwest Gate, and gabion walls westward from the stadium, working around archeological data recovery areas to do this work. x The Contractor completed roadwork along Veterans Way, including track-way at the 5th/College and 6th Street intersections. Veterans Way was opened eastbound for check-in of ASU students, and the westbound lane was opened for the first ASU game on August 31st. Guide-way preparation from 5th/College to 6th Street was conducted around archeological discoveries in the guide-way itself. x The Contractor continued to prepare guide-way east from 6th Street, to University Drive. x The Contractor continued tie-in of the 30-inch waterline at Rural Road and constructed an entrance from the new Terrace Road into Cholla Hall to facilitate ASU student check-in. x The Contractor continued roadway work along the north side of Apache Boulevard in preparation for paving. The Contractor continued placement of street light foundations on the south side. Third-party utility companies continued relocations eastward along Apache Boulevard. x The Contractor continued work on wing walls at the 101 Freeway Bridge, placed new traffic signal conduits and foundations at the Price Road intersections, and conducted exploratory work in the center of the of the 101 Bridge structure in preparation for demolition. x The Contractor shifted traffic to the completed south side of the Tempe Canal Bridge, and demolished pavement, curb, and sidewalk, as well as the old bridge structure on the north side. Abutment piers were drilled, and the abutments formed for the new north side of the bridge structure. x The Contractor continued utility relocation work from the Tempe Canal Bridge, eastward toward Dobson Road in the City of Mesa. Page 69 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. x Key interface dates with follow-on contractors Station Finishes, TES and S&C are still achievable. SSWJV continues to make excellent efforts to work through utility and other conflicts to keep the project moving forward. Issues and Solutions x Significant archeological data recovery in Lot 55 and along Veterans’ Way, as well as utility conflicts, have impeded guide-way and promenade work in the ASU area. Completing Veterans’ Way roadway prior to return of students, and the ASU Promenade prior to beginning of football season, was a challenge, but was achieved to ASU’s satisfaction through coordination and intense effort. x The placement of street light conduits along Apache Boulevard by APS and SRP-Power continues to delay street widening efforts there. The contractor has altered its schedule to enable the utilities to complete that work expeditiously. x The potential for other utility conflicts is being reviewed in conjunction with the contractor’s baseline schedule and three-week “look-aheads”. Resolution of utility issues is addressed weekly in the Line Section 5 Utilities Coordination meeting. x The contractor has taken positive steps to assure positive public involvement, issuing notices to stakeholders regarding construction activities, and resolving stakeholder concerns as quickly as possible. SSWJV has continued to receive 100 percent of the Community Advisory Board incentive award. Construction Photos Continuation of Work at Retaining Wall 1 Retaining Wall 5, Ash to First Street Page 70 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Roadway Work at Veterans’ Way Roadway Work at Tempe Canal Bridge Page 71 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT 3.1.5 Line Section 5 B rian B uchanan Sundt/Stacey W itbeck Sam G raham D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: Septem ber 15,2006 D ata Through: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) (SPI) C ostPerform ance (6/7) (C PI) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $74.3 x Budgeted/Planned 80.0 Total ForecastatC om plet ion $3. 8 70.0 Plann C om pleted W ork to D ate Total= $70.8 $0.1 $0.3 5309 $68,882,969 $266,960 $847,481 $69,997,410 $33,066,144 $26,319,719 $26,281,751 $43,715,659 $68,444 $70,065,854 10.8% 47.2% 37.6% 0.80 1.00 $3,708,135 $3,441,175 92.8% C N PA $1,573,317 $148,556 $0 $1,721,873 $403,568 $293,971 $475,378 $1,246,495 $0 $1,721,873 27.6% 23.4% 17.1% 0.00 0.00 $107,679 $107,679 100.0% Total $70,456,286 $415,516 $847,481 $71,719,283 $33,469,712 $26,613,690 $26,757,129 $44,962,154 $68,444 $71,787,727 37.3% 46.7% 37.1% 0.80 0.99 $3,815,814 $3,548,854 93.0% N /A -$509,229 $0 $69,997,410 $3,725,106 $2,994,707 $2,940,117 $67,057,293 -$22,865 $69,974,545 4.2% 5.3% 4.3% 0.80 1.02 N /A N /A ($387,689) -$896,918 $0 $0 $1,721,873 $71,719,283 $0 $3,725,106 $0 $2,994,707 $170,188 $3,110,305 $1,551,685 $68,608,978 $0 -$22,865 $1,721,873 $71,696,418 9.9% 4.3% 0.0% 5.2% 0.0% 4.2% 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.96 M onthly Perform ance M easures 95.3% Cof ontingency Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O B70. udget 5 3.8 70.5 0.3 0.1 33.5 26.6 D ollars in M illions 60.0 C onti C ontingency Expended 3.8 0.3 79.4% of Planned 50.0 40.0 $70.5 $70.5 93.0% R em aining 30.0 20.0 $33.5 $26.6 10.0 $3.8 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate LS5 C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 72 C ontingency Available $0.3 C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 48th Street Bridge Replacement ȱ Description The 48th Street Bridge Replacement Contract consists of the replacement of one concrete vehicular and one utility bridge over the SRP Grand Canal, construction of underground utilities including water mains and APS ductbanks, jack and bored utility pipe casings under UPRR railroad track, curb and gutter, sidewalk and driveways, grading and fencing of the METRO rail material storage yard, and removal and replacement of asphalt concrete pavement. Progress x The work on the utility bridge is substantially complete. All that remains is the installation of the protective bollards around the APS electrical pole and punch list items noted. The Contractor is addressing the remaining work when the trades become available. No work was done this month. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x This contract was closed out after final completion, final acceptance and final payment. Issues and Solutions x None Page 73 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Town Lake Bridge ȱ Description The Town Lake Bridge consists of an 11-span structure with concrete deck and steel deck truss superstructure on concrete piers. The structure has an overall length of 1, 546 feet. The North and South approaches to the bridge are of retained earth fill and are approximately 1,654 feet in total length. The construction work includes cast-inplace drilled shaft pier foundations to bedrock, cast-in-place concrete pier caps, concrete abutments, concrete retaining walls, a steel truss superstructure, cast-in-place concrete deck, specialty lighting, demolition, relocation of public utilities, roadway and drainage modifications, systems duct bank conduits, streetlights, OCS pole foundations, preparation of track embankment and installation of concrete track slab. Installation of direct fixation rail for both the approaches and the bridge is included in Line Section 4 contract. Progress x The contractor completed installing expanded metal panels (or scrim) on the outside of the trusses. Page 74 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Completed landscaping at the north end of the project and continued landscaping in Tempe Beach Park and along Rio Salado Parkway. x Completed production truss coating, applying one coat of epoxy over the primer, one coat of white and one coat of clear urethane. Punch list touch up is underway. x The spare parts and operating equipment for the special purpose lighting system was turned over to METRO and accepted. x Demobilization of the field office complex and completion of punch list activities is underway. x The contractor has submitted the required as-built drawings. x The project has been deemed substantially complete. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Milestone C which was to “Complete the Work” in 560 days was achieved effective August 28, 2006 at 560 days following Notice to Proceed. Milestone B (Unimpeded track-way access by all follow-on contractors) was achieved early on July 20, 2006. Issues and Solutions x No major issues at this time. Construction Photographs Completed Bridge Deck Rio Salado Parkway Complete ȱ Page 75 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: 3.6.1 Tow n Lake B ridge B illG ustafson PC L C ontractors JoelM ona D ata Through: July 31,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $22.5 x Budgeted/Planned Total 25.0 ForecastatC om pletion Total= $22.3 $0.0 5309 C N PA Total $21,219,861 $17,523 $21,237,384 $847,508 $0 $847,508 -$183,000 $0 -$183,000 $21,884,369 $17,523 $21,901,892 $21,812,051 $17,523 $21,829,574 $20,903,725 $15,771 $20,919,496 $20,825,570 $15,771 $20,841,341 $1,058,799 $1,752 $1,060,551 $0 $0 $0 $21,884,369 $17,523 $21,901,892 66.1% 90.0% 95.2% 99.7% 100.0% 99.7% 95.5% 90.0% 95.5% 0.96 0.00 0.96 1.0 1.0 1.0 $1,242,400 $1,402 $1,243,802 $211,892 $1,402 $213,294 17.1% 0.0% 17.1% N /A $0 $0 $21,884,369 $37,913 $0 $0 $21,884,369 $0 $21,884,369 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.00 1.00 $1,242,400 $211,892 17.1% N /A $0 $0 $17,523 $0 $0 $0 $17,523 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.00 1.00 $0 $0 0.0% N /A $0 $0 $21,901,892 $37,913 $0 $0 $21,901,892 $0 $21,884,369 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.00 1.00 $1,242,400 $211,892 17.1% M onthly Perform ance M easures Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 99.1% of C ontingency 21.2 1.2 B udget 21.2 1.0 0.0 $1.2 D ollars in M illions Plann C om pl20. eted0W ork to D ate $1.0 21.8 20.9 C onti C ontingency Expended 95.8% of Planned 1.2 1.0 15.0 $21.2 $21.2 $21.8 $20.9 10.0 17.1% R em aining 5.0 $1.2 $1.0 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate TLB C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 76 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Maintenance and Storage Facility ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ Description The Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) contract includes construction of Maintenance of Equipment (MOE) building, Maintenance of Way (MOW) building, Car Wash facility, Service and Cleaning facility, maintenance equipment and tools, entry station, track installation in the yard and shop areas, construction of yard lead track from the LRT mainline in Washington Street to the MSF site including a bridge over the UPRR railroad track and SRP Grand Canal, retaining walls and embankment, fill materials for site preparation, grading and drainage, drain channel and swales, culverts and underground drainage pipes, roadways, parking lots, landscaping, fencing, water mains for fire protection and domestic services, utility services, electrical ductbanks, OCS pole foundations, and systems ductbanks. Progress x MSF is now connected to the APS power grid. The main switchboard and transformer in the MOE building has been tested, inspected and energized. Other MOE electrical panels have also been completed, tested and energized. x Work along the yard lead track is complete with exception to grounding of four OCS foundations and the installation of negative return disconnect trench which is now in being constructed. x At the MOE building work is nearing completion on the HVAC equipment, chilled water system and duct work, grids for the suspended ceilings, fire sprinkler system, compressed air piping, drywall, kitchen cabinets, lockers and painting. Page 77 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Significant progress has been made in the installation of the telecommunications and fire detection systems, roll-up coiling doors in the MOE building. The pace of window glass installation has improved this month. Work is progressing in compressed air equipment room and boiler room. Electrical rough-ins to the building equipment, conductor terminations at the equipment and electrical panels is nearing completion throughout the building. x Toilet fixtures, toilet partitions, carpeting, vinyl composition tile are now being installed. x All the MOE building exterior vertical wall panels have been installed. Work on the panel trim is in progress. x Track and special track work installation is complete with exception of fastening of the MOE M2, M3 and M4 tracks to their support pedestals. x Assembly and installation of LRV lifts, truck elevator, and turntable in the basement are almost complete including the electrical rough-in and conductors. x Assembly of the shade canopy structures in the MOE parking lot is almost complete. Construction continues for the remaining curbs, gutters and side walks at the MOE and MOW parking lots. x Planting of trees and shrubs is progressing well throughout the work site. Work along the entry road is substantially complete. x At the MOW building metal studs installation as well as mechanical and plumbing rough-in work is nearing completion. The HVAC installations along with plumbing and fire protection piping are ongoing. The electrician is pulling branch and feeder wires and scheduled also as fill-in work. Exterior vertical wall panel installation has started and is progressing well. Painting of the steel superstructure is on going. x At the LRV Wash building work on the HVAC system continues. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x The Contractor is presently reviewing the status of the remaining contract milestones and Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for MOE. Final contract completion remains forecasted for January 22, 2007. x The latest project schedule update indicates 88.2 percent of the work is complete. Page 78 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Construction Photographs Utility Clearance – City of Phoenix Blue Tag MOE from the East Shade Canopies in the MOE Parking Lot Motor Control Center for the LRV Lift Page 79 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: 3.5.1 M aintenance SupportFacility A vrum Loew enstein Sundt/Stacy W itbeck Frank A ber D ata Through: A ugust31,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $64.2 Total= $64.1 x 70. Budget 0 ed/Planned Total ForecastatC om pletion 5309 Total $57,637,721 $57,637,721 $6,636,150 $6,636,150 -$257,984 -$257,984 $64,015,887 $64,015,887 $56,006,982 $56,006,982 $56,473,575 $56,473,575 $56,104,974 $56,104,974 $7,910,913 $7,910,913 -$472,826 -$472,826 $63,543,061 $63,543,061 87.6% 87.6% 87.5% 87.5% 88.2% 88.2% 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 $6,513,772 $6,513,772 $92,464 $92,464 1.4% 1.4% N /A $85,370 $0 $56,006,982 $2,292,673 $3,719,338 $2,811,057 $53,195,925 -$85,370 $55,921,612 5.0% 4.1% 6.6% 1.62 1.32 N /A $85,370 $0 $56,006,982 $2,292,673 $3,719,338 $2,811,057 $53,195,925 -$85,370 $55,921,612 5.0% N /A N /A 1.62 1.32 M onthly Perform ance M easures C ontingency 6 99.9%57. of B udget Forecast/Actual Pending C O 6.5 57.6 -0.5 $6.5 60.0 Plann 56.0 C om pleted W ork to D ate 56.5 50. C ont i 0 6.5 100.8% of 6.4 Planned D ollars in M illions C ontingency Expended 40.0 30.0 $57.6 $57.6 $56.0 $56.5 1.4% R em aining 20.0 10.0 -$0.5 $6.5 $6.4 0.0 -10.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate M SF C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 80 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Park-and-Ride ȱ Description Surface Park-and-Rides (PNR) are proposed at eight sites along the alignment. Approximately 3,600 spaces are to be provided. Sites are located at 19th Avenue and Montebello, 19th Avenue and Camelback Road, Central Avenue and Camelback Road, 38th Street and Washington Street, Dorsey Lane and Apache Boulevard, McClintock Road and Apache Boulevard, Price Freeway and Apache Boulevard., and Sycamore and Main Street. The lots are adjacent to Transit Centers at 19th Street and Montebello, Central and Camelback and Sycamore and Main Street. The Surface Parking Lots construction package includes work for demolition, grading, drainage, concrete curbs, concrete sidewalks, asphalt concrete pavement, lighting, irrigation, landscaping, a security building, signing and pavement marking. CCTV security cameras and emergency telephones will be installed under the Signals and Communication construction package. Progress x The 19th Avenue and Montebello site is at 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. 100 percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. Page 81 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x The 19thAvenue and Camelback site is at 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. 100 percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. x The Central Avenue and Camelback PNR change order for redesign is complete. The new design will be complete and approved in time to include in the total PNR bid package in April 2007. x The Dorsey and Apache PNR has been designed by the City of Tempe as a maintenance upgrade only. Completion of this work is outside of this Contract. x The 38th Street and Washington Street PNR site has reached the 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. A final draft for the IGA between Gateway Community College and the City of Phoenix has been settled. One hundred percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. x The McClintock and Apache PNR site has reached the 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. One hundred percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. The City of Tempe is working with a prospective developer to design and construct a Transit Oriented Development that would provide an equivalent number of parking spaces as proposed for the current surface parking lot. If the development proceeds, it is to be completed for parking no later than the current surface lot date of December 2008. If the development does not proceed the current surface lot will be constructed as planned. x The Loop 101 and Apache PNR site has reached the 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. One hundred percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. x The Sycamore and Main PNR site has reached the 100 percent design completion by the primary sub-consultant. One hundred percent consolidation of plans is in process by the GEC. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x The budget for all sites is $15,104,339 with a contingency of $1,208,300. x A December 2005 construction estimate and projections indicate a base cost (without soft costs) of $21,000,000. This cost does not include shade canopies. x With the Central and Camelback site included, a bid date is scheduled for April 2007 with construction completion of all sites by December 2008. Construction start-up of some sites is necessarily delayed by their use as construction yards by the line section contractors. Page 82 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Issues and Solutions x None Page 83 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Track Material Procurement ȱ Description The track materials are broken down into five separate procurements as follows: x Ballasted Special Trackwork – includes ballasted turnouts and concrete switch ties for the MSF and direct fixation fasteners for the MSF, Town Lake Bridge (TLB) and Deck Park Bridge. x Girder Rail – rail needed for the embedded trackwork. x Girder Rail Special Trackwork – turnouts needed for the embedded trackwork. x Concrete Crossties – concrete crossties needed for the MSF. x T Rail – rail for the MSF, TLB including approaches and Deck Park Bridge. Progress x Girder Rail o The Contractor is approximately 98 percent complete. The Contractor did not make any material deliveries during this month. x Embedded Special Trackwork o The Contractor continues to produce crossover and turnout castings for this contract. During this month the rail team made an inspection trip to Birmingham, Alabama to check on the Contractor’s progress and perform a layout inspection on the first half of the Pocket Track for LS5. If this first half Page 84 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT is approved the contractor will deliver the materials the first week in September. o Our next inspection trip (Birmingham, Alabama) is scheduled for late August 2006. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Track material procurement activities remain on schedule and within budget at this time. Issues and Solutions x There are no significant issues at this time. Construction Photo Crossties for Turnout 4-5 and 4-6 that are to be installed on Line Section 4 ȱ Page 85 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Traffic Signal Procurement ȱ Description These Purchase Orders include the system-wide procurement of traffic signal poles, controllers, controller cabinets, and traffic central system upgrades for the City of Phoenix and Tempe. Progress x All of traffic signal equipment for the five Line Section Contracts initially ordered under these Purchase Orders has been delivered to METRO or directly to the Line Section Contractors’ staging areas. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Traffic signal procurement activities have been completed. x A table showing the status of costs incurred to-date versus budget is shown below: Description COP Traffic System Upgrades COT Traffic System Upgrades Traffic Signal Controller/Cabinets LS 1 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms (PO is completed) LS 2 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms (PO is completed) LS 3 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms (PO is completed) LS 4 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms Contract/Budget Amount $958,862.00 $344,097.00 $2,711,527.00 Total Payments $596,957.60 $189,612.00 $2,516,973.82 $209,144.33 $204,961.42 $309,685.98 $304,479.32 $1,369,268.37 $1,241,739.95 $369,069.21 $365,378.49 Page 86 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Description Contract/Budget Amount (Phoenix) (PO is completed) LS 4 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms (Tempe) (PO is completed) LS 5 Traffic Signal Poles/Mast Arms (Tempe) Total Payments $337,883.37 $336,248.15 $942,013.10 $840,942.23 ȱ Issues and Solutions x A Non-Conformance Reports (NCR) was issued to CEM-TEC Inc., the Line Section 3 Traffic Signal Pole contractor, at the end of July 2006 because of a problem that was encountered with some of the copper colored poles that were delivered under this particular purchase order. The paint finish on these poles has oxidized leaving a white film over the paint finish. x The Contractor response for the cause of non-conformance and their recommendation for remedy are being evaluated by the Resident Engineer and the City of Phoenix. Construction Photos Copper colored poles have developed an oxidation problem Copper colored poles stored at Maintenance Storage Facility Storage Yard Page 87 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Underfloor Wheel Profiling Machine ȱ Description Design, fabricate, furnish an Underfloor Wheel Profiling Machine, Mechanical Chip Collection/Removal Conveying System, and all necessary accessories, items of equipment, and mechanical, electrical, controls and structural items to re-profile wheels on Light Rail Vehicles. Deliver the machine to the MSF and install the machine within the concrete foundation constructed by the Agency in the Maintenance of Equipment building. Inspect, test, start-up the machine to ensure it is operating properly and safely and provide training to Agency staff. Progress x Simmons Machine Tool Corporation continues to work on the manufacturing of components and assembly of the machine. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Wheel profiling machine activities remain on schedule and within budget at this time. Issues and Solutions x None Page 88 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 13. Systems Automated Fare Collection System ȱ Description Design, manufacture, furnish, assemble, test, inspect and install the LRT Automated Fare. Collection System (AFCS) for use by METRO. The AFCS consists of Ticket Vending Machines (TVMs), Ticket Validators (Validators) integrated within the TVMs, a Data Collection/Information System (DC/IS), station LANs, Hand Held Verifiers (HHVs), Revenue Collection Equipment, related data communication networks to allow the TVMs to communicate with a central fare collection computer, spare parts, tools, test equipment, documentation, software listings, training, technical assistance and warranty. Progress x Submittals review comments have been provided to the Contractor including Management Plan, Preliminary Master Program Schedule and Contract CDRL List. x Contractor currently in the Conceptual Design Phase. Contractor provided 21 conceptual design submittals for review and comments. CDR meeting will be scheduled in October 2006. Page 89 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x Fare collection system activities remain on schedule and within budget at this time. Issues and Solutions x COP Public Transit Department and METRO received Contractor’s Proposal to combine Fare Collection Data Central Processing in one single office. Proposal is in review by METRO and COP PTD/ITD. Page 90 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: Fare C ollection M achines A rkady B ernshtryn Scheidt& B achm ann U SA ,Inc. Thom as K lings D ata Through: N /A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) Total= $7.7 x 8.0Budgeted/Planned Total $0.6 ForecastatC om pletion 7.0 Total= $7.1 $0.0 $7,100,012 $0 $0 $7,100,012 $131,782 $0 $0 $7,100,012 $1,600 $7,101,612 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% N /A N /A $574,535 $574,535 100.0% $0 $0 $0 $7,100,012 $1,540 $0 $0 $7,100,012 $0 $7,100,012 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N /A N /A M onthly Perform ance M easures 92.5% of B udget C ontingency 7.1 Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 0.6 7.1 Plann C om pleted W ork to D ate 0.1 0.0 C onti C ont 5.0ingency Expended 0.6 0.0 6.0 D ollars in M illions 0.0 $0.0 0.0 4.0 $7.1 $7.1 3.0 0% of Planned 2.0 100.0% R em aining 1.0 $0.6 $0.1 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion $0.0 Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate Fare C ollection M achines Through Septem ber '06 Page 91 $0.0 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Light Rail Vehicle Description METRO has a Contract with KINKISHARYO International, L.L.C. (KI) for two prototype and forty eight production light rail vehicles (LRVs) for a total of thirty-six LRVs. The contract includes prototype engineering, special tools and test equipment, training, spare parts and publications. The cars are 70 percent low-floor, double-articulated LRVs with two main “A” and “B” passenger sections and a mid “C” section, joined to form one single operating unit. There are four passenger doors on each side and an operators cab at each end. The LRVs are designed to be “street friendly” with energy absorbing bumpers and crashworthy cab ends. Progress x METRO is continuing review of submittals of Contract Data Requirement List items (CDRLs) the bulk of which are test procedures and reports as well as First Article Inspection (FAI) reports. x METRO held Design Review Meeting No. 22 with KI on June 15, 2006. The main topics for presentation by KI and discussion were: Bumper side panel application; truck FAI; closing open items; bumper fit; master control review on mockup; climate room schedule; and vehicle delivery schedule. Page 92 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x METRO/KI dialogue continues regarding vehicle final assembly in Arizona. Also, the MSF is still one option. x Changes for an Overhead Catenary System (OCS) Surveillance Camera Installation on two cars and an Automatic Passenger Counting System (APC) for the fleet are being processed. The following describes ongoing METRO resident inspection, quality assurance, manufacturing monitoring, and site surveillance activities at the Kinki Sharyo factory in Osaka Japan (KS-J) during June 2006: x LRV Mass Production – 20 Trains are now in production. x An inspection of the grit blasting is being performed and ongoing. No defects noted. x A visual and dimensional inspection of underframe and car body was performed and ongoing. The dimensions were within tolerance, but defects were noted during the inspection. No defects remained after rework and reinspection. x KS-J completed the 14 underframe bolsters and has set up the end frame underframe jig for mass-production. The end underframe for car 105A was produced and removed from the jig, and KS-J performed weld finishing work. The first 14 underframes for car 105 - 114 have been welded and inspected, and NDT for 105A and C have been completed. Underframes have been grit blasted and primer has been applied. x Carbody – water tests were performed on Cars 101 - 109. Some open items remain. Sound deadener has been applied. Installation of the insulation is now in process. In car 102A, installation of the main duct and ceiling panels as well as the cab partition wall is complete. Installation of window masks is in process. In cars 103 to 105 installation of the main duct and ceiling panels is in process. In car 103 to 109 installation of interior wiring and duct is in process. 102 is scheduled for climate testing October 2, 2006 – October 20, 2006. x Concealment inspections were witnessed in two stages each for cars 101 and 109. All noted defects were repaired. No defects remain. x KS-J has made parts adjustments to all the A and B prototype cars at the cab front mask around the front destination sign opening. This allowed KS-J to install the front windshield and destination sign window. x KS-J advised that a new rubber seal will be installed on the front headlights to improve the water tightness. x LRV 101 left Japan on September 30, 2006 heading to Baltimore. On October 26, 2006 testing will start in November at Hudson Bergen. Page 93 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x 102 is at Nippon Sharyo for climate testing October 2, 2006 – October 20, 2006 and will not ship to METRO until January 7, 2007 due to eliminate room modifications Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x No perceptible cost or schedule variance. Car delivery remains on schedule sufficient to meet the needs of the overall program. Performance is indicated on the spreadsheet. Issues and Solutions x None Construction Photographs Carbody clearance test. Prototype car 101, August 1, 2006. Horizontal curve carbody clearance test for articulation. Prototype car 101, August 1, 2006 Prototype car 101C loaded and ready for shipment from KSOsaka to Kobe Port. September 19, 2006 Page 94 SEPTEMBER 2006 RAIL PROGRESS REPORT 3.7.1 LightR ailVehicles Steve B ethel K inkisharo International John Sw anson D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: A ugust31,2006 D ata Through: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 5309 C O P Funded Total $115,369,780 $40,050,160 $155,419,940 $2,255,676 $0 $2,255,676 $0 $0 $0 $117,625,456 $40,050,160 $77,575,296 $19,136,067 N /A $19,136,067 $20,702,833 N /A $20,702,833 $20,672,257 N /A $20,672,257 $96,953,199 N /A $96,953,199 $0 N /A $0 $117,625,456 $40,050,160 $117,625,456 17.6% N /A 26.6% 16.3% N /A 24.7% 17.6% N /A 26.7% 1.08 N /A 1.08 1.00 N /A 1.00 $4,768,489 $2,135,840 $6,904,329 $2,512,813 $2,135,840 $4,648,653 52.7% 100.0% 67.3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) Pending C hanges ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) $115,369,780 $0 $0 $117,625,456 $973,987 $4,750,728 $4,681,735 $112,943,721 $0 $117,625,456 4.0% 16.3% 16.3% 1.00 1.00 $4,768,489 $2,512,813 52.7% Total= $162.3 x Budgeted/Planned 180. 0 Total Forecastto C om plete 160.0 $0.0 $6.9 Plann C om plet 140. 0ed W ork to D ate D ollars in M illions Total= $157.7 $2.3 $40,050,160 $0 $0 $40,050,160 N /A N /A N /A N /A N /A $40,050,160 N /A N /A N /A N /A N /A $2,135,840 $2,135,840 100.0% $155,419,940 $0 $0 $157,675,616 $973,987 $4,750,728 $4,681,735 $112,943,721 $0 $157,675,616 6.0% 24.7% 24.7% 4.88 1.00 $6,904,329 $4,648,653 67.3% M onthly Perform ance M easures Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 97.1% of C ontingency 155.4 6.9 B udget 155.4 2.3 0.0 19.1 20.7 C ont 120. 0 C ont ingency Expended 6.9 2.3 100.0 80.0 $155.4 $155.4 60.0 108% of Planned 67.3% R em aining 40.0 20.0 $19.1 $20.7 $6.9 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastto C om plete Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate D ata Through Septem ber 06 N ote:C O P Funded D ata unavailable Page 95 C ontingency Available $2.3 C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Signals and Communications Description The LRT Signal and Communications (SC) Contract provides for the final design, manufacturing, installation, and testing of the integrated signal and communication system. Major work elements include train signal equipment and communication hardware and software for controlling train movements through crossovers and interlockings, fiberoptic backbone communication transmission system (CTS), closed-circuit TV (CCTV), public address system (PA), variable message boards (VMB), Train Control System, Vehicle Management (VMS), Radio System, PABX and Telephone System including emergency telephones at Park-and-Rides and Transit Centers, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA), installation of workstations and equipment in the Operations Control Center (OCC) and at the Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF), six site-built signal buildings and three signal buildings combined with traction power substations. The work scope also includes installation of fiber-optic cables for street traffic control systems for the Cities of Phoenix, Tempe and Mesa, and installation of fiber-optic cables for ASU. Page 96 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Progress x Signal Buildings and Signal Cases o Contractor completed foundation and slab at Signal Building No. 6. o Contractor currently coordinating and installing power feeds from the MOW Building at Signal Building No. 5. o Contractor continuing electrical and mechanical rough-in installation at Signal Building No. 4. o Contractor continuing electrical and mechanical rough-in installation at Signal Building No. 3. x Signaling System o Contractor performed Factory Acceptance Testing for the Culver Interlocking Signal Equipment with Metro representatives as witnesses. o Contractor is performing checkout inspection and testing in preparation for Factory Acceptance Testing for the McKinley Loop Interlocking Signal Equipment, as well as First Article Inspection for Signal Cases. x Communications System o Contractor currently performing Final Design for Communication System. o Metro, MEC, ACS, and GeoFocus met at GeoFocus's facility to discuss vehicle data radio interfaces and protocols. x OCC Build Out o Contractor starting core drilling operations at the OCC Building. x Coordinating with other Contracts o Master Schedule Update. Contractor presented S&C Mitigation Schedule to Metro. Contractor is currently preparing cost impacts package to support revised facilities access and system milestone dates. o On-going coordination with LS4 Contractor for the Yard Entrance Area to support installation of power and signal rail connections, earth boxes, and signals. Installed pigtails for shunt fouling and AFO track circuits. o On-going coordination with LS3 Contractor for the McKinley Loop Area to support installation of power and signal rail connections, earth boxes, and signals. o On-going coordination with MSF Contractor to support required systems startup interfaces. Continuing to await resolution of turnover punch-list items. Page 97 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o Met with vehicle systems contractor to discuss communications systems and vehicle systems. interface between Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x The contractor has completed 21.2 percent of the work to-date. The contract is in the early stages of submittals, design and procurement with some field construction work in progress. Field construction to date has included the civil and architectural parts of four signal buildings, signal equipment installation in the MSF Yard signal building, some architectural work at the OCC, some track bonding at MSF and installation of powered switch machines at MSF. Planned progress is currently being evaluated as the master schedule revisions are being implemented. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Issues and Solutions x Mitigation Schedule. Awaiting the Contractor Mitigation Schedule Cost Impacts submittal, due October 13, 2006. Construction Photographs SB No. 3 - Installation of Overhead Cable Trays SB No. 5 – Installation of 480V Power Cable Page 98 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT SB No. 6 - Compacting for AC Pad SB No. 4 - Testing SFRM FAT Culver Interlocking Signal Equipment Yard Entrance - Rail Bonding Shunt Fouling Pigtails Page 99 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT 3.7.4 Signals & C om m unications Leslee O 'C onell M ass Electric Steve K yauk D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: A ugust15,2006 D ata Through: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 5309 $37,476,762 $867,256 -$80,332 $38,344,018 $13,513,386 $10,414,977 $8,871,776 $29,472,242 $126,728 $38,470,746 23.1% 35.2% 27.2% 0.77 1.17 $2,388,332 $1,521,076 63.7% C N PA $1,480,805 $0 $0 $1,480,805 $130,569 $67,955 $30,000 $1,450,805 $0 $1,480,805 2.0% 8.8% 4.6% 0.52 2.27 $93,913 $93,913 100.0% Total $38,957,567 $867,256 -$80,332 $39,744,491 $13,643,955 $10,482,932 $8,901,776 $30,842,715 $126,728 $39,871,219 22.4% 34.3% 26.4% 0.77 1.18 $2,482,245 $1,695,321 68.3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period O riginalBudget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) N /A $380,753 $0 $38,344,018 $872,845 $2,116,646 $553,317 $37,790,701 -$1,577 $38,342,441 1.4% 2.3% 5.5% 2.42 3.83 $2,388,332 $1,521,076 63.7% N /A $0 $0 $1,480,805 $14,637 $37,927 $0 $1,480,805 $0 $1,480,805 0.0% 1.0% 2.6% 2.59 N /A $93,913 $93,913 100.0% N /A $380,753 $0 $39,824,823 $887,482 $2,154,573 $553,317 $39,271,506 -$1,577 $39,823,246 1.4% 2.2% 5.4% 2.43 3.89 $2,482,245 $1,695,321 68.3% Total= $41.4 x Budgeted/Planned 45.0 Total ForecastatC om pletion 40.0 Total= $39.9 0.1 M onthly Perform ance M easures 96.2% 39. of0 B udget C ontingency Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 2.5 39.0 $2.5 Plann C om pleted W ork to D ate $0.8 0.1 13.6 10.5 35.0 D ollars in M illions 0.8 C onti C ont ingency Expended 30. 0 2.5 0.8 25.0 20.0 $39.0 77% of Planned $39.0 68.3% R em aining 15.0 10.0 $13.6 $10.5 5.0 $2.5 $0.8 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om pletion Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate S& C C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 100 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Traction Electrification System ȱ Description The Traction Electrification System (TES) provides the electric power required to operate the Light Rail Vehicles (LRV). There are two main components to the TES, these are: Traction Power Substations (TPSS) that convert incoming utility power to DC power, which is used by the LRV and the Overhead Contact System (OCS), which distributes the DC power to the trackway. There are 15 Site Built 2,000 kW substations. Twelve of the substations are 22 feet by 44 feet and three are 22 feet by 57 feet. The substation buildings will be constructed of integrally colored concrete block on landscaped sites. The OCS is comprised of 20 route miles of double-track low-profile overhead catenary. The OCS will be installed on over 1,300 round painted poles. The nominal system voltage is 750 VDC. The nominal height of the OCS above the roadway is 18 feet, 6 inches. The TES Contract provides final design of the TPSS and OCS, manufacturing, fabrication, installation and testing. Progress x Traction Power Substation No. 1 o Fireproofing patchwork progressed. x Traction Power Substation No. 2 o Roof installation has been completed. Page 101 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT o Interior walls and rough-in work has commenced. o Rectifier-Transformer has been delivered. x Traction Power Substation No. 3 o Excavation of ductbanks continued. x Traction Power Substation No. 4 o Installation of conduits, ductbanks, and ground grid commenced. x Traction Power Substation No. 5 o No work performed this month. x Traction Power Substation No. 6 o Door installations have commenced. o Installation of HVAC ductwork and equipment commenced. x Traction Power Substation No. 7 o CMU wall installation has commenced. x Traction Power Substation No. 8 o No work performed this month. x Traction Power Substation No. 9 o DC Switchgear, AC Switchgear, Rectifier and Bus Duct have been delivered. x Traction Power Substation No. 10 o Installation of conduits, ductbanks, and ground grid progressed. x Traction Power Substation No. 11 o Installation of conduits, ductbanks, and ground grid progressed. x Traction Power Substation No. 15 o Metal paneling installation has been completed. o CMU voids have been replaced. o Installation of door hardware progressed. Page 102 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT x Overhead Contact System o OCS pole/hardware installations continue in the MSF Yard. x Site Access/Permits o TPSS #13 was submitted to Mesa Building Safety for permit. The building permit should be available by October 16, 2006. o TPSS #14 was submitted to Mesa Building Safety for initial review. The building permit should be available by November 16, 2006. o TPSS No. 12 (McClintock Park-and-Ride) has utility impacts which require remediation to allow the TPSS building to be constructed. Tempe has engaged an electrical engineer to provide design for relocation of the underground electrical serving the mobile home park. The design will be followed by re-routing of the underground electrical. The schedule access to this site is January 15, 2007 x Coordination with other Contracts/Entities o Ongoing coordination meetings are being held with the Facility Contractors. Cost and Schedule – Variance Analysis x The contractor has completed 27.8 percent of their work to-date. The contract is in the final stages of design and procurement with some factory design and productions tests in progress. Field construction to date has included the civil and architectural parts of eleven out of the sixteen traction power substations and OCS components installation in the yard and yard lead at MSF. Planned progress is currently being evaluated as the master schedule revisions are being implemented. x Planned versus actual progress is currently being evaluated as the Master Schedule revisions are being implemented. Issues and Solutions x MEC has been given comments on their mitigated schedule based on the updated projected Civil Contract milestone dates. MEC is scheduled to submit their revised mitigation schedule during the week of October 16, 2006. Page 103 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Construction Photographs 2nd Lift of CMU Walls at TPSS No. 7 Ductwork Installation at TPSS No. 6 Grading work at TPSS No. 10 Installation of Rectifier into TPSS No. 9 Metal Stud Framing at TPSS No. 2 Concrete Encasement of Negative Ductbank at TPSS No. 11 Page 104 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Adjustment of Crossspans and Stagger on Storage Tracks Page 105 Cantilever Arm Installation at MSF Yard SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT D escription: PE/PA : C ontractor: R esidentEngineer: 3.7.3 Traction Electrification System s A lan Friend M ass Electric C orporation R on W ong D ata Through: A ugust15,2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 C um ulative Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled W ork Earned ActualExpenditures Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) 5309 $56,681,003 $193,353 $0 $56,874,356 $21,200,197 $17,767,298 $16,912,345 $39,962,011 $74,398 $56,948,754 29.7% 37.3% 31.2% 0.84 1.05 $3,721,000 $3,527,647 94.80% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Period Budget Executed C hange O rders BudgetTransfers C urrentBudget(1+2+3) W ork Scheduled (C um m -LastPeriod) W ork Earned (C um m -LastPeriod) ActualExpenditures (C um m -LastPeriod) Forecastto C om plete Base (4-7) C hange O rders Pending Execution ForecastatC om pletion (7+8+9) PercentBudgetExpended (7/4) PercentPlanned (5/4) Earned PercentC om plete (6/4) Schedule Perform ance (6/5) C ostPerform ance (6/7) C ontingency Budget R em aining C ontingency PercentC ontingency R em aining (17/16) N /A $4,000 $0 $56,874,356 $1,410,205 $1,931,077 $1,133,167 $55,741,189 $70,398 $56,944,754 2.0% 2.5% 3.4% 1.37 N /A $3,721,000 $3,527,647 94.80% M onthly Perform ance M easures al= x 70.0 Budgeted/PlTot anned $60.4 Total ForecastatC om plete Total= $56.9 94.3% of B udget C ontingency 56.7 Forecast/Actual Executed C O Pending C O 3.7 56.7 0.2 0.1 $0.1 60.0 $3.7 Plann C om pleted W ork to D ate 21.2 17.8 $0.2 D ollars in M illions C 50. onti0 3.7 C ontingency Expended 0.2 40.0 30.0 $56.7 84% of Planned $56.68 94.8% R em aining 20.0 $21.2 10.0 $17.77 $3.7 $0.19 0.0 TotalC ontract Budget Forecastat C om plete Planned W ork to C om pleted W ork D ate to D ate TES C ontractThrough Septem ber '06 Page 106 C ontingency Available C ontingency Expended Page 107 Duration Start 0 0 0 MSF_2 MSF_3 MSF_6 01AUG04 26DEC08 01OCT06 06OCT06 08:49 0 © Primavera Systems, Inc. Start Date Finish Date Data Date Run Date LS4_4 LS4_3 1,083* 11JAN05A 123* 01JUN06A LS4_HAM23 Utilities 176* 29MAY06A 298* 05MAR07* LS4_HAM22 Right of Way Line Section 4 CAR_4 0 0 CAR_2 CAR_3 0 CAR_1 Light Rail Vehicles 0 854* 14SEP04A MSF_5 MSF_1 Finish 15NOV06* 29DEC07 01OCT06 20NOV06 27DEC07 23FEB07* 15FEB07* 14DEC06* 15JAN07 06DEC06* 19OCT06* 22AUG06A 15JAN07 Maintenance & Storage Facility Revised Master Schedule Activity ID Early Bar Critical Activity Progress Bar 6010 Line Section 4 Construction METRO Rail Program Control Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT Project October 1, 2006 Sheet 1 of 10 Presentation Schedule Access for TES/S&C-Trackway Complete LS-4 Milestone 1 48th St to 56th St Line Section 4 Utility Relocations Line Section 4 ROW Deliver Rail Cars 105 - 136 (original contract) Deliver Rail Car 104 Deliver Rail Car 103 Deliver Rail Car 101 & 102 MSF Milestone- Project Completion MSF Milestone-MOW Substantial Completion MSF Milestone-MOE Substantial Completion MSF Milestone- Rail Track Substantial Completion MSF Construction 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 108 0 LS4_1 123* 01JUN06A 929* 16MAY05A LS3_HAM23 LS3_2 0 LS3_1 397* 01MAY06A 958* 18JUL05A LS5_HAM23 LS5_5 0 0 LS5_4 LS5_8 Utilities 125* 29MAY06A LS5_HAM22 Right of Way Line Section 5 0 LS3_6 0 LS3_3 0 0 LS3_4 LS3_5 0 LS3_CP01 Utilities 155* 29MAY06A Start LS3_HAM22 Right of Way Line Section 3 0 Duration Activity ID LS4_5 18JUN07* 09FEB07* 01MAR08 01JUN07 30NOV07 30OCT07* 15OCT07* 15SEP07* 02JUL07* 16OCT06* 30NOV07 01OCT06 30OCT06 29DEC07 21JAN07* Finish Sheet 2 of 10 LS-5 - Milestone C2 TES/S&C Access E of McClintock to 1981+40 E of 101 Track/OCS Unrestricted Trackway Access TLB to 1867+00 Trackwork, OCS Fndn's LS-5 - MS A2 TES/S&C Access (Startup Area 1) Line Section 5 Construction Line Section 5 Utility Relocations Line Section 5 ROW LS-3 - Milestone H Overall Completion Trackway Complete - Roosevelt to McDowell LS-3 Milestone D TES/S&C Access Trackway Complete- 7th St to 16th St LS-3 Milestone C TES/S&C Access Trackway Complete - 7th St to Roosevelt LS-3 Milestone A TES/S&C Access Trackway Complete - 16th St to 26th St LS-3 Milestone B TES/S&C Access LS-3 - Civic Plaza Area Avalable Line Section 3 Construction Line Section 3 Utility Relocations Line Section 3 ROW LS-4 Milestone F Overall Completion Access for TES/S&C - Trackway Complete LS-4 Milestone 2 44th St to 48th St 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 109 0 0 0 LS5_12 LS5_14 LS5_1 319* 01JUN06A 869* 09NOV05A LS1_HAM23 LS1_3 0 0 LS1_6 LS1_1 154* 01JUN06A 860* 15AUG05A LS2_HAM23 LS2_3 0 0 LS2_55 LS2_7 Utilities 236* 29MAY06A LS2_HAM22 Right of Way Line Section 2 0 LS1_4 Utilities 176* 29MAY06A Start LS1_HAM22 Right of Way Line Section 1 0 Duration LS5_10 Activity ID 19JAN07 30SEP06 22DEC07 01NOV06 19JAN07 26MAR08 10JAN08* 22AUG07* 26MAR08 15APR07 20NOV06 01MAR08 01NOV07* 10OCT07* 22JUN07* Finish Sheet 3 of 10 Indian School to Encanto LS-2 Milestone E TES/S&C Access 1st Place Between Earl & Montgomery LS-2 Milestone A Roadway Project LS-2 Contract Duration Line Section 2 Utility Relocations Line Section 2 ROW LS-1 Milestone E Overall Completion N of Bethany Home to 19th/Camelback Trackwork Complete LS-1 Milestone D TES/S&C Access LS-1 Milestone B TES/S&C Access Central/Camelback to 19th Ave/Camelback Trackwork Complete Line Section 1 Construction Line Section 1 Utility Relocations Line Section 1 ROW LS-5 - Milestone H Overall Completion E of Dobson to End of Line Unrestricted Trackway Access LS-5 - Milestone F2 TES/S&C Access 1998+49 to 2031+73 E of Dobson Unrestricted Trackway Access LS-5 - Milestone E2 TES/S&C Access 101 to 1998+49 (E of Tempe Canal) Track/OCS Unrestricted Trackway Access LS-5 - Milestone D2 TES/S&C Access 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2009 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 110 0 0 LS2_10 LS2_1 0 TTL_3 LS-1 547* 01OCT06 619* 05DEC06 SF_HAM04 SF_HAM05 PR_HAM01 Park and Ride LS-5 LS-4 612* 06APR07 265* 01OCT06 SF_HAM03 LS-3 547* 01OCT06 0 547* 01OCT06 SF_HAM02 LS-2 SF_1 SF_HAM01 SF_2 1,096* 24OCT05A 0 Station Finishes Start 594* 14FEB05A TTL_2 TTL_1 Tempe Town Lake 0 Duration Activity ID LS2_4 07DEC08 14AUG08 30MAR08 22JUN07 30MAR08 23OCT08 30MAR08 23OCT08 25AUG06A 25AUG06A 22DEC07 20SEP07* 26JUN07* Finish Station Finishes Construction Sheet 4 of 10 SF, Line Section 1 SF, Line Section 3 Park and Ride SF, Line Section 5 SF, Line Section 4 SF, Line Section 2 Station Finishes - Overall Completion TTL Milestone C Contract Completion TTL Milestone B Bridge Trackway Access Tempe Town Lake Construction LS-2 Milestone J Overall Completion Encanto to N of McDowell LS-2 Milestone H TES/S&C Access Camelback to Indian School LS-2 Milestone B TES/S&C Access 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 111 Duration Start 690* 04APR06A 0 0 0 SCM2B_2 SCM2A_2 SC_999 07JUN07 08OCT07 50 11AUG07 37 02MAY07 160 02MAY07 62 27JUN07 SC_1002 SC_2102 SC_2003 SC_2002 SC_3004 37 02DEC07 SC_2100 Sheet 5 of 10 37 20NOV07 SC_2006 07JAN08 26DEC07 S&C, LS-2 Central/Thomas Sta Const S&C, LS-2 Central/Encanto Sta Const S&C, LS-2 Central/Osborn Sta Const 37 11OCT07 SC_2005 16NOV07 25JUN08 329 02AUG07 SC_2001 S&C, LS-2 Pierson X-ovr Bldg #1 S&C, LS-2 Central/Indian School Sta Const 02SEP07 37 28JUL07 S&C, LS-2 Central/Campbell Sta Const S&C, LS-2 Central/Camelback Sta Const S&C at LS-1 -19th Ave/Camelback Area Const S&C at LS-1 - 7th Ave/Camelback Area Const S&C, LS-2 Earl X-ovr 29SEP07 S&C at LS-1 19 & Montebello Area Construction S&C Milestone Area 3 Signals Complete S&C New Milestone 2A -Compl. OCC, SCADA, Signals S&C Milestone Area 2 Signals Complete S&C Milestone Area 1 Signals Complete S&C Operations Controls Center Construction Signal & Communica Proposed Center Parkway Station 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2009 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL 27AUG07 LS-2 25 28JUL07 SC_1003 21AUG07 555* 01OCT06 07APR08 06JUL08* 28JUN08* 15MAY08* 15MAR08* 23FEB08 16OCT08 22FEB08 Finish SC_1001 LS-1 0 419 01JAN07* 1,341* 14FEB05A SC_992 SC_OCC1 SC_001 Contract Summary Signal & Communications CP_HAM01 Engineering/Design Proposed Center Pkwy Station Activity ID Page 112 12OCT07 120 15JUN07 41 04SEP07 SC_4120 SC_4104 Sheet 6 of 10 03JUL07 41 24MAY07 14OCT07 19APR07 S&C, LS-4 -Washington & 38th St Station S&C, LS-4 -Washington & 44th Transit Ctr S&C, LS-4 -Washington & 44th St Station S&C, LS-4 -Washington & Priest Station S&C, LS-4 -Washington St x-ovr S&C, LS-4 -TPSS#7 - 27th St x-ovr SC_4102 LS-4 41 10MAR07 SC_3309 S&C, LS- 3 Jefferson/12th St Station Const SC_4103 21 16JUN07 SC_3322 24MAY07 S&C, LS- 3 Washington/12th St Station Const 11JAN07 24 01MAY07 SC_3310 21MAY07 S&C, LS- 3 Washington/24th St Station Const 58 15NOV06 24 28APR07 SC_3308 24APR07 S&C, LS- 3 Jefferson/1st Ave Station Const SC_4101 24 01APR07 SC_3311 01APR07 S&C, LS- 3 Washington/3rd St Station Const 29MAR07 21 12MAR07 SC_3305 25MAR07 S&C, LS- 3 Jefferson/3rd St Station Const 180 01OCT06 21 05MAR07 SC_3306 09MAR07 S&C, LS- 3 VanBuren/Central Station Const SC_4100 21 17FEB07 SC_3307 08FEB07 S&C, LS- 3 Van Buren/1st St Station Const S&C, LS- 3 Roosevelt/Central Station Const 28 12JAN07 SC_3303 04FEB07 S&C, LS- 3 Jefferson/24th St Station Const 16JUL07 24 12JAN07 SC_3321 04FEB07 S&C, LS- 3 Washington/Central Station Const 24 23JUN07 24 12JAN07 SC_3312 01FEB07 S&C, LS- 3 Culver Sig Bldg #2 Const S&C, LS- 3 McKinley Sig Bldg #3 Const 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL S&C, LS- 3 McDowell/Central Station Const 21 12JAN07 SC_3304 10DEC07 12NOV07 Finish 06JUL07 436* 01OCT06 SC_3301 Start 586* 06APR06A Duration SC_3300 LS-3 Activity ID Page 113 30 01DEC06* 48 16MAY07 63 30AUG07 152 28SEP07 68 30OCT07 100 30OCT07 255 02NOV07 68 10NOV07 80 14JAN08 SC_TTL01 SC_5009 SC_5010 SC_5005 SC_5014 SC_5012 SC_5007 SC_5016 SC_5006 283* 10JAN06A 61* 01OCT06* SC_M003 SC_M002 0 945* 10APR06A TESM10A_2 TES_001 Contract Summary 0 1,306* 11JAN05A Traction Electrification FC_013 FC_001 Contract Summary Automated Fare Collection 487* 06DEC05A SC_M001 Maintenance & Storage Facility 45 15NOV06 SC_5004 Start 499* 16MAR06A Duration SC_5001 LS-5 Activity ID 22FEB08* 08AUG08 09NOV08 09NOV08 30NOV06 19OCT06 06APR07 02APR08 16JAN08 13JUL08 06FEB08 05JAN08 26FEB08 31OCT07 02JUL07 30DEC06 29DEC06 27JUL07 Finish Sheet 7 of 10 Fare Collection Contract TES New Milestone 10A - Compl TES Work Area 1 TES - Contract Ready for Revenue Service Compl & Accept of the Sys Int Test S&C Construction - MSF Yard Entrance, Washington S&C Construction - MSF Yard Lead S&C Construction - M&SF Yard S&C, LS-5 - Apache/Price Fwy Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - Apache/Smith Mart Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - Main/Syc (Dobson) Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - Apache/Dorsey Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - Apache/McClintock Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - Univ/Rural Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - 5th/College Station Area Const S&C, LS-5 - 3rd/Mill Station Area Const S&C, TTL Bridge Area Construction S&C, LS-5 - Macayos & AWA Const S&C, LS-5 - Mill Pocket (Misson Palms) Const 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 114 0 0 TESM10C_2 TES_999 547* 30JAN06A 75 11OCT07 75 11JAN08 349 07JUL07* 350 07JUL07* TES_1002 TES_1010 TES_1090 TES_2002 TES_2000 15NOV06 10OCT07 273* 16FEB06A 100 03JUL07 210* 16SEP07 180* 16OCT07 556* 11JUL05A 426* 01AUG05A 401* 01DEC05A 87 16NOV06 TES_2004 TES_3000 TES_3004 TES_3002 TES_4000 TES_4002 TES_4008 TES_4010 LS-4 10FEB07 05JAN07 17JAN07 12APR08 12APR08 13DEC06 378* 01DEC05A TES_2006 LS-3 150 20NOV07 17APR08 20JUN08 19JUN08 25MAR08 24DEC07 30JUL07 30JUN07 08AUG08 27JUN08* 12APR08 Finish TES_2020 LS-2 695* 05AUG05A Start TES_1000 LS-1 0 Duration Activity ID TESM10B_2 Sheet 8 of 10 TES - LS-4 OCS Construction Test Track TES - LS-4 - TPSS# 7 TES - LS-4 - TPSS# 8 TES - LS-2 -OCS Construction TES - LS-2 Catalina TPSS#4 TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 16th to 26th St TES - LS-4 - TPSS# 9 TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 7th to 16th St TES - LS-3 OCS Construction 3rd to Roosevelt TES - LS-3 - TPSS# 6 TES - LS-3 -Roosevelt TPSS# 5 TES - LS-2 Indian School TPSS#3 N of Bethany Home to 19th TES - LS-1 - OCS Construction Central/Camelback to 19th Ave TES - LS-1 - OCS Construction TES - LS-1 - 17th Ave TPSS# 2 TES - LS-1 Montebello TPSS# 1 TES Milestone 10 - Complete TES Work TES New Milestone 10C - Compl TES Work Area 3 TES New Milestone 10B - Compl TES Work Area 2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 115 227* 31MAR07* 371* 01DEC05A 482* 01DEC05A 513* 01DEC05A 543* 01DEC05A 586* 01DEC05A 110 10FEB07 117 19JUN07 110 23JUN07 117 29AUG07 110 11OCT07 TES_4004 TES_5000 TES_5018 TES_5020 TES_5022 TES_5006 TES_5002 TES_5012 TES_5014 TES_5010 TES_5016 333 01OCT06* TES_MSF003 TURNOVER_2 0 Rail Activation Plan TES_TTL001 64 04OCT06* 199 01OCT06* TES_MSF01 Tempe Town Lake 17APR07 10 01OCT06* TES_MSF02 15MAR08* 06DEC06 29AUG07 10OCT06 471* 21MAR06A 04JUL07 28JAN08 23DEC07 10OCT07 13OCT07 30MAY07 09JUL07 27MAY07 27APR07 27MAR07 06DEC06 TES_MSF004 Maintenance & Storage Facility LS-5 07MAR07 112 16NOV06 12NOV07 Finish Start Duration Activity ID TES_4006 Sheet 9 of 10 Turnover Area 1 to VMR Operations TES - Tempe Town Lake Perm Power TPSS# 10 TES - MSF TPSS# 15 TES - M&SF Shop TPSS16 TES - 56th Street TPSS# 9 TES - MSF OCS Installation TES - LS-5 OCS Const Dobson to EOL TES - LS-5 OCS Const Rural to McClintock TES - LS-5 OCS Const 101 to Dobson TES - LS-5 OCS Const McClintock to 101 TES - LS-5 OCS Construction Ash to Rural TES - LS-5 - TPSS# 11 TES - LS-5 - TPSS# 14 TES - LS-5 - TPSS# 13 TES - LS-5 - TPSS# 12 TES - LS-5 - TPSS# 10 TES - LS-4 OCS Construction 25th to 44th St TES - LS-4 OCS Construction Wash/Central 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2009 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL Page 116 60 17JUN08 OPTTR5_2 31 26NOV08 0 27DEC08 PREREVC_2 0 SFTYCERT_2 PREREV_2 0 60 16SEP08 OPTTR4_2 INTTESTC_C 0 16SEP08 60 17AUG08 INTTESTD_2 OPTTR3_2 60 16AUG08 0 30 07AUG08 OPTTR6_2 TURNOVER_5 INTTESTC_2 0 45 16MAY08 INTTESTB_2 TURNOVER_4 124 15MAY08 26DEC08 25NOV08* 25NOV08 14NOV08 15OCT08 14OCT08 15AUG08 05SEP08 06AUG08 15AUG08 29JUN08 15SEP08 15MAY08* 14MAY08* 60 16MAR08 0 Finish Start Duration OPTTR2_2 TURNOVER_3 Activity ID INTTESTA_2 Sheet 10 of 10 Revenue Service Date (ROD) Pre-Revenue Operation Complete Safety Certification Process Complete Integrated Testing Final Operators Training(Entire Line - 2 Months) Start Final Operators Training (Entire Line) Integ.Tests Entire Line - Dynamic Signal & Comm Final OCC Controllers Training T/O OCC/Comm. Entire Line to VMR Operations Integ.Tests Area 3 -Track, Clearance, TES Turnover Area 3 to VMR Operations Preliminary OCC Controllers Training Integ.Tests Area 2 -Track, Clearance, TES Pre-Final Operators Training (6 Mi.- 4 Months) Turnover Area 2 to VMR Operations Integ.Tests Area 1 -Track, Clearance, TES 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JJUL SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT Acronyms ȱ AASHTO AC ACI ADA ADOT AISC AISI APM APPROX APS AREMA ASTM ASU ATS AT&T AWC AWG AWS BTU CAC CALCS CCTV CFM CFS CMU CNPA COE COM COMM COP COT CPU CRSI CRT American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Alternating Current American Concrete Institute Americans with Disabilities Act Arizona Department of Transportation American Institute of Steel Construction American Iron and Steel Institute Automatic People Mover Approximately Arizona Public Service American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association American Society for Testing and Materials Arizona State University Automatic Train Stop American Telephone and Telegraph Company Archer Western Contractors American Wire Gauge American Welding Society British Thermal Unit Construction Administration Consultant Calculations Closed Circuit Television Cubic Feet Per Minute Cubic Feet Per Second Concrete Masonry Unit Concurrent Non-Project Activity US Corp of Engineers City of Mesa Communications City of Phoenix City of Tempe Central Processing Unit Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute Cathode Ray Tube Page 117 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT CTS CWR CY DBE DC DSD DWG EPA EST FAA FAI FHWA FPS FTA GEC HVAC ICBO IEEE IFB IPI LAN LRT LRV LS MAG MEC MISC MOE MOW MPH MSF MUTCD NEC NEMA NESC NFPA Carrier Transmission System Continuous Welded Rail Cubic Yard Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Direct Current Development Services Department Drawing(s) Environmental Protection Agency Estimate, Estimated Federal Aviation Administration First Article Inspection Federal Highway Administration Feet Per Second Federal Transit Administration General Engineering Consultant Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning International Conference of Building Officials Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Invitation For Bid In Process Inspection Local Area Network Light Rail Transit Light Rail Vehicle Line Section Maricopa Association of Governments Mass Electric Company Miscellaneous Maintenance of Equipment Maintenance of Way Miles Per Hour Maintenance and Storage Facility Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices National Electrical Code National Electrical Manufacturers Association National Electrical Safety Code National Fire Protection Association Page 118 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT NRHP OCC OCS O&M OPS PA PAN PBAX PCI PSI PED PMC PNR PSF PSI PTZ QA QC RE RFI RI RPM ROW RTU S&C SCADA SDI SJI SONET SPEC SRP SSPC SSW SSWJV SWG TBD National Register of Historic Places Operations Control Center Overhead Contact System Operations And Maintenance Operations Public Address Pantograph Telephone Private Exchange And Controls Prestressed Concrete Institute Pre Shipment Inspection Pedestrian Program Management Consultant Park-and-Ride Pounds Per Square Foot Pounds Per Square Inch Pan Tilt Zoom Quality Assurance Quality Control Registered Engineer Request For Information Receiving Inspection Revolutions Per Minute Right-of-Way Remote Terminal Unit Signals and Communications Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Steel Deck Institute Steel Joist Institute Synchronous Optical Network Specification Salt River Project Structural Steel Painting Council Sundt/Stacy and Witbeck Sundt/Stacy and Witbeck Joint Venture Southwest Gas Corporation To Be Determined Page 119 SEPTEMBER 2006 PROGRESS REPORT TCE TES TTLB TPSS TTY TVM TWC UBC UL UPRR UPS VCR VETAG VMB VMR VMS WAN Temporary Construction Easement Traction Electrification System Tempe Town Lake Bridge Traction Power Substation Text Teletype ADA Device Ticket Vending Machine Train to Wayside Communications Uniform Building Code Underwriters Laboratories Incorporated Union Pacific Railroad Uninterruptible Power System Video Cassette Recorder Vehicle Tagging System Variable Message Board Valley Metro Rail Vehicle Management System Wide Area Network Page 120