Transit Performance Report FY 20 0 6 -20 07 (J U N E 30, 20 07 ) JANUARY 20 08 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) Transit Performance Report I S S U E D : J A N U A R Y 20 0 8 The Transit Performance Report (TPR) is prepared and updated annually by Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA). This report is developed using input from, and reviewed by, member agencies and the RPTA Board. The TPR serves as input to Maricopa Association of Governments’ (MAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) updates. In 2006 RPTA hired a consultant to conduct a Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study (SEES). One task of this study was to develop a series of performance measures. Transit service in the region is made possible and supported by many funding sources including local city taxes in many cases. The SEES performance measures support the auditing requirements of Proposition 400 legislation. Proposition 400 authorizes a half-cent sales tax approved by voters in 2004 that goes toward freeway, street, transit and light rail improvements. In addition, the SEES developed initial performance targets that will allow comparison between performance expectations and actual performance. These performance measures and performance targets have been incorporated into the TPR. In future years these targets will be reviewed, refined and indexed to inflation as appropriate. The 2007 TPR continues to transition between the previous Performance Management Analysis System (PMAS) format and the new TPR and is based on the findings from the SEES and the data available at the time. In the future, the TPR will serve as a report card indicating the performance of each mode and service category at the system and route level as defined in the SEES. Modes covered by future TPRs will include fixed route, paratransit, vanpool, Table of Contents and light rail. This report reflects data as reported to RPTA by member DEFINITIONS .................. 3 agencies. In fiscal year 2006-07 (July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007), there were many changes affecting data collection and reporting. Some of these changes include service providers transitioning to new fareboxes FIXED ROUTE BUS......... 4 PARATRANSIT ................ 8 and light rail construction along major transit routes. Also as part of transitioning towards a new TPR, data definitions and measurements have changed from previous reporting years. 2 VANPOOL ....................... 12 SYSTEM SUMMARY ...... 15 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) Definitions Average Fare: Average fare is the average price a person pays for a transit trip. It is equal to total fare revenue collected divided by total boardings. Boarding: A boarding is known as an unlinked passenger trip. Every time a person boards a vehicle it is counted as a boarding. For example, if a person makes a trip involving one transfer, this trip is counted as two boardings. Consumer Price Index (CPI): This index is used to measure changes in prices from one period to another. The CPI is frequently used to adjust base payments to reflect changes in prices. In this Report, the CPI for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) which is averaged for all U.S. Cities, not adjusted for seasonal changes, for transportation items with a base period of 1982-1984=100 was used. The average annual index for FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 were calculated using the average monthly index from each fiscal year. The change from the average FY 2005-06 index to FY 2006-07 index is 0.79 percent. Farebox Recovery Ratio: This is the percentage of total operating cost that is covered by fares collected. It is equal to total fare revenue collected divided by total operating costs. Mechanical Failures: Mechanical failure is a failure of some mechanical element of the revenue vehicle that prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip. In addition, mechanical failures include failures from mechanical element of the revenue vehicle, because of local agency policy, prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or starting the next revenue trip even though the vehicle is physically able to continue in revenue service. Net Vanpool Starts: Calculated by subtracting number of deleted vanpools from the number of new vanpools started. Operating Cost: The total cost to operate and maintain a transit system including labor, fuel, and 3 maintenance, and administration. Revenue Hour: A revenue hour is an hour that one vehicle in revenue service is available to pick up revenue passengers. If ten vehicles are in service for two hours each, they collectively perform twenty revenue hours of service. Revenue Mile: A revenue mile is a mile traveled by one vehicle in revenue service that is available to pick up revenue passengers. If ten vehicles are in service for two miles each, they collectively perform twenty revenue miles of service. Revenue Service: Revenue service occurs when a vehicle is available to the general public and there is an expectation of carrying passengers who pay the required fare. Vehicles operated in fare-free service are also considered in revenue service. Revenue service includes layover/ recovery time, but does not include deadhead (i.e. travel from garage to the start point of a route), or vehicle maintenance testing. Safety Incident: Safety incidents only include major safety incidents that involve a transit vehicle or occur on transit-controlled property. Some conditions that apply to a major indecent involve property damage equal or exceeding $25,000, fatality or major injuries for two or more people. Security Incident: Security incidents are crimes (e.g. injuries or deaths resulting from assaults, arson, homicide) and the consequences of security incidents. Security incidents only include major incidents which involve a fatality, two or more injures or property damage over $25,000. Subsidy per Boarding: Also known as net operating cost per boarding, this is the operating cost per boarding minus the fare revenue per boarding. This number indicates the amount of public funding that is used to make up the difference between the cost of providing transportation service and the revenue generated by this service on a per boarding basis. FIXED ROUTE BUS (S YSTEM -W IDE ) Includes local, Express/BRT, shuttle/circulator and rural routes. T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) FIXED ROUTE BUS (S YSTEM -W IDE ) The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target Farebox Recovery Ratio 25% Regional Fare Policy recommendation approved by Board on September 20, 2007. Operating Cost per Boarding $2.34 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Subsidy per Boarding $1.76 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $5.00 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Average Fare $0.68 Five year timeframe starting in FY08* Annual Increase in Total Boardings 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study - Board approved Annual Increase in Boardings, Weekday, Saturday, Sunday 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study - Board approved Avg. Boardings per Revenue Mile 2.1 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* COST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS S ERVICE E FFECTIVENESS Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Inflated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 5 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) FIXED ROUTE BUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS (S YSTEM -W IDE ) C OST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost per Boarding Target $2.34 Target 25% 25.87% 23.67% 24.24% 2005* 2006 2007 The percentage of operating cost covered by fare revenue increased slightly from FY 2005-06. Fare revenue increased faster than operating cost in part because newer service continues to mature and schedules and routes were adjusted. Subsidy per Boarding $2.23 $2.29 $2.62 2005* 2006 2007 Operating cost increased while boardings decreased slightly. Rising fuel costs and labor contributed to the increase in operating cost. Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $6.00 $1.99 Target $1.76 $1.75 $1.65 2005* 2006 Target $5.00 $4.71 $4.90 $5.28 2005* 2006 2007 2007 The net operating cost per boarding increased from last year and exceeds the target. Operating cost per revenue mile increased from last year and exceeds the target. Average Fare Target $0.68 $0.64 $0.58 $0.54 * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 2005* 2006 2007 Fare revenue increased by $0.10 per boarding but fell slightly short of the target. 6 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) FIXED ROUTE BUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS (S YSTEM -W IDE ) S ERVICE E FFECTIVENESS Total Fixed Route Boardings Annual Increase/Decrease in Total Boardings (Includes shuttles/circulators) Annual Increase/Decrease in Weekday Boardings 59,070,596 58,858,166 58,184,595 Target 3% Target 3% - -1.88% 2005* 2006 2007 - 2005* -1.14% This includes local, express/BRT, shuttle/circulator, and rural routes. 2005* 2006 2007 2007 The previous report measured total weekday boardings. Boardings on a typical weekday decreased slightly from the previous year. Boardings decreased slightly from FY 2005-06. Annual Increase/Decrease in Saturday Boardings 2006 Annual Increase/Decrease in Sunday Boardings Boardings per Revenue Mile Target 2.1 2.12 2.15 2005* 2006 2.01 Target 3% Target 3% -2.66% -1.05% 2005* 2005* 2006 2006 2007 2007 The previous report measured total Saturday boardings. Boardings on a typical Saturday decreased from the previous year. Boardings per Revenue Mile decreased slightly. The previous report measured total Sunday boardings. Boardings on a typical Sunday decreased slightly from the previous year. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 7 2007 PARATRANSIT T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) PARATRANSIT The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target Farebox Recovery Ratio 5% Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Operating Cost per Boarding $28.78 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Subsidy per Boarding $27.37 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $50.70 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Annual Increase in Total Boardings 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study Boardings per Revenue Hour 1.76 Baseline from FY05-06 PMAS Dial-a-Ride system average* ADA On-time Performance 90% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study COST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS S ERVICE E FFECTIVENESS Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Inflated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 9 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) PARATRANSIT PERFORMANCE RESULTS C OST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost per Boarding $31.97 Target $28.78 4.81% Target 4.41% 2005* 2006 2005* 2007 This ratio decreased slightly from the previous year and still is below the target. Subsidy per Boarding 2006 2007 Operating costs increased while boardings decreased. Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $30.56 Target $27.37 Target $50.70 $55.46 2005* 2006 2007 The net operating cost to transport each passenger increased from the previous year. 2005* 2006 2007 The operating cost per revenue hour increased slightly from the previous year and was above the target. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 10 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) PARATRANSIT PERFORMANCE RESULTS S ERVICE E FFECTIVENESS Annual Increase/Decrease in Total Boardings Boardings per Revenue Hour 6% Target 1.76 5% 1.73 4% 3% 2% 1% -1.71% 0% 2005* -1% -2% 2005* 2006 2007 2006 2007 Boardings per revenue hour decreased slightly and was slightly below the target Total boardings decreased by almost two percent. ADA On-Time Performance The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is federal law which prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities in 93.5% 89.8% 95.39% many areas, including public transportation. On-time performance measures how many ADA boardings occurred within 30 minutes of the pick-up time given to the passenger at the time of their reservation. Performance exceeded the target by over 5 percent. 2005* 2006 2007 * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 11 VANPOOL T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) VANPOOL The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target Farebox Recovery Ratio 100% Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Operating Cost per Boarding $1.71 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Subsidy per Boarding $0 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $0.46 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Average Fare $1.85 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Boardings per Revenue Mile .27 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Annual Increase in Total Boardings 0% Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Number of new Vanpools started 24 2003 Regional Transportation Plan COST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS S ERVICE E FFECTIVENESS Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Inflated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 13 T R A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 07 (J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 ) VANPOOL PERFORMANCE RESULTS C OST E FFICIENCY /E FFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost per Boarding 116.00% $1.72 Target $1.71 115% 114.00% $1.70 112.00% $1.68 110.00% $1.66 108.00% $1.70 $1.64 107.89% 106.00% $1.66 $1.62 $1.63 105.25% 104.00% $1.60 102.00% $1.58 2005* Target 100% 100.00% 2005* 2006 2006 2007 2007 Farebox recovery ratio increased from the previous year. That is, fare revenue exceeded operating cost at a greater percentage. Operating cost per boarding decreased compared to last reporting year and is below the target. Subsidy per Boarding Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 Target $0.00 $0.00 -$0.10 -0.09 -0.13 -$0.20 $0.46 $0.44 $0.44 -0.24 Target $0.46 -$0.30 2005* 2006 2007 Subsidy per boarding continues to decrease. This means that fare revenue exceeded operating cost. 2005* 2006 2007 Operating cost per revenue mile decreased from the previous year and was below the target. Total Vanpool Boardings Net Vanpool Starts 70 1.5 million 1,418,466 60 60 1.4 million 50 1.3 million 40 1,270,416 1.2 million 30 1.1 million 20 Target 24 26 19 1,025,136 10 1.0 million 2005* 2006 2007 0 2005* Vanpool boardings continued to increase 2006 2007 Fewer vanpools started than in the previous year and didn’t make the target number. In FY 2006, a “Start a vanpool and get one month free” promotion was held. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 14 TR A N S I T P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T F Y 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 07 7 ((J J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 07 07 ) SYSTEM SUMMARY Performance Indicator Fixed Route Paratransit Vanpool System Total Farebox Recovery 24.24% 4.41% 115% 22.20% Operating Cost per Boarding $2.62 $31.97 $1.63 $3.05 Subsidy per Boarding $1.998 $30.56 -$0.24 $2.37 Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $5.28 $0.44 $5.40 Average Fare $0.64 $1.41 $1.87 $0.68 Total Boardings 58,184,595 922,790 1,418,466 60,525,851 Boardings per Revenue Mile 2.01 0.27 1.77 For questions or detailed data supporting this document, please call (602) 262-7433 and request the Transit Performance Report Support data. 15