HE

ENCH

The Arizona Superior Court in Pima County
is the second largest court in the state. The
bench comprises 28 full-time judges who are
nominated for office by the Pima County
Commission on Trial Court Appointments and
appointed by the governor.
Each judge
appointed through this process stands for
retention in office during a general election
and serves a four-year term. The court also has
three full-time judges pro tempore, one parttime commissioner and 16 full-time
commissioners who are appointed by the
presiding judge of the court through a local
merit selection process.
Judges are assigned on a rotating basis to
one of five benches or departments: criminal,
civil, probate, family law and juvenile. Each
bench is administrated by a presiding judge.
Generally, judges maintain their assignment
for two to five years.
Each of the court’s judges is assigned a
judicial administrative assistant, and a bailiff
or law clerk. All retained judges have assigned
court reporters while commissioners utilize
court reporters from a court reporter pool. The
clerk of the superior court provides each
judicial division with a courtroom clerk who
keeps the official record of proceedings and
preserves exhibits and other evidence.

HE

RESIDING

UDGE

The presiding judge of the superior court is
appointed by the Arizona Supreme Court and
serves a five-year term. The presiding judge
has responsibility for the administration of the
superior court, as well as the Pima County
Consolidated Justice Court, Ajo Justice Court,
Green Valley Justice Court, Sahuarita
Municipal Court, Oro Valley Municipal Court,
South Tucson Municipal Court and Tucson
City Court.

The presiding judge appoints other judges
to serve as the associate presiding judge and as
bench presiding judges. A bench presiding
judge is assigned to each department of the
court – called “benches” to oversee judicial
activities. Benches are based on case types:
criminal, civil, family law, probate and
juvenile.
RESIDING

UDGE

RANSITION

The Honorable Gordon
Alley, Div. 23, the presiding
judge for superior court,
passed away the night of
Nov. 27, 2001, at a local
hospice facility. Judge
Alley’s death was the
conclusion of a two-year
battle against
cancer.
Judge Alley would have
completed three years of his Hon. Gordon
five-year term at the end of 2001.

Hon. Kenneth Lee

Alley

Upon the death of Judge
Alley, The
Honorable
Kenneth Lee, Div. 3, the
associate presiding judge for
superior court, assumed the
role of acting presiding
judge pending the chief
justice’s appointment of a
new presiding judge.

Toward the end of January
2002, Chief Justice Jones
appointed The Honorable
John Leonardo, Div. 10, as
presiding judge for superior
court. Judge Leonardo, a
nine-year veteran of the
court, was serving on the
juvenile bench at the time of
his appointment as presiding judge. He asked Hon. John Leonardo
Judge Lee to remain a part
of the court’s management structure as the
associate presiding judge.

In September 2001,
The Honorable Jan
Kearney
was
appointed to Division 9
by Governor Jane Dee
Hull, replacing The
Honorable
Michael
Brown who retired
from the bench. Her
initial assignment was
to the family law bench.

Hon. Jan Kearney

Judge Kearney had previously served as an
assistant U.S. Attorney specializing as Border
Liaison and Southwest Border Coordinator.
She also had served as chief of the criminal division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Tucson.
In February 2002,
Governor Hull appointed
The Honorable Carmine
Cornelio to Division 23 to
fill the vacancy left by the
death of The Honorable
Gordon Alley. His initial
service at superior court
Hon. Carmine Cornelio was on the civil bench.
Judge Cornelio came to the bench from private practice where he specialized in real estate and insurance litigation. He also practiced
in the area of alternate dispute resolution as a
mediator or arbitrator.
Also
in
February
2002, the U.S. Senate
gave its approval to the
presidential nomination
of The Honorable Cindy
Jorgenson to a seat on
the U.S. District Court
for the District of Arizona. Judge Jorgenson Hon. Cindy Jorgenson
had served on the superior court bench since April 1996. During her
tenure she served on the criminal and family
law bench. In 2001, she was appointed presiding judge of the family law bench.

The Honorable John Quigley, a 17-year veteran of the
superior court bench, announced his retirement in
April 2002. During his tenure,
Judge Quigley served three
years on the civil bench and
three years on the family law
bench.
He was presiding Hon. John Quigley
judge of the family law bench
from 1998 until his retirement. Prior to his
appointment as a retained judge, he served as
a judge pro-tem and commissioner.
In June 2002, Governor Hull announced the
appointment of two judges to fill the vacancies
left by Judges Jorgenson and Quigley.
Appointed to Division 25
was The Honorable Michael
Miller. He began his assignment on the juvenile bench.
Judge Miller came to the
superior court from private
practice where he specialHon. Michael Miller ized in product liability law,
as well as insurance law and
commercial litigation. In addition, Judge
Miller served as a judge pro tem for the superior court presiding over civil, family law, juvenile and mental health cases. He also served
as a hearing officer on attorney discipline matters for the State Bar of Arizona.
Appointed to Division 5 was The Honorable
Virginia Kelly. Her initial
assignment was to the criminal bench.
Judge Kelly had previously served as deputy chief
of the U.S. Attorney’s Office
in Tucson where she served
Hon. Virginia Kelly
in the appellate section focusing on criminal appeals. Prior to that, she
served as a trial attorney prosecuting federal
law cases including bankruptcy fraud, mail
fraud, alien smuggling, kidnapping and border
drug crimes.

OURT

URISDICTION

The Arizona Superior Court in Pima County
is a court of general jurisdiction serving the
residents of Pima County. Pima County is the
second largest county by population in Arizona
with 843,746 residents counted in the 2000
Census.
The court can hear almost any type of case
except small claims, minor offenses and
violations of city codes and ordinances. The
superior court has jurisdiction in the following
matters:
♦ Criminal felony and misdemeanor cases
not otherwise provided by law.
♦ Civil cases involving sums of money in
excess of $10,000. All civil cases where
the amount in controversy does not
exceed $50,000 are referred to
compulsory arbitration.
♦ Forcible entry and detainer.
♦ Dissolutions of marriage, adoptions or
other family-related matters.
♦ Probate matters.
♦ Appeals from limited jurisdiction courts
throughout Pima County.
The juvenile court, as established under
state law, has jurisdiction over delinquent and
incorrigible young people in Pima County. The
bench also has jurisdiction over matters
involving dependent children who are the
victims of abuse, neglect or abandonment. The
juvenile court is located at 2225 East Ajo Way
and is staffed by over 500 employees.
OURT

ANAGEMENT

EAM

The Court Management Team meets on a
bi-weekly basis to confer and collaborate on
issues that impact the court as a whole and to
develop policies and procedures designed to
enhance operations. Members of the
management team include the
presiding
judge, associate presiding judge, presiding
judge of Pima County Juvenile Court, Clerk of

the Superior Court, court administrator,
deputy court administrator, chief probation
officer and juvenile court director.
OURT

DMINISTRATION

Under the direction of the presiding judge,
the court administrator is responsible for the
non-judicial operations of superior court.
Court administration comprises departments
including: financial services, human resources,
training, facilities
management, and
information and technology services. The court
administrator also oversees adult probation,
calendar services, court interpreters, the
court reporters’ pool, jury services, the law
library, and pretrial services.
The Financial Services Department is
primarily responsible for developing and
overseeing the court’s $35 million annual
budget, while monitoring all expenditures and
revenues relating to court operations and
assisting departments in preparing and
monitoring their budgets and assuring that
each is in compliance with the minimum
accounting standards provided by the Arizona
Supreme Court.
Human Resources manages all personnel
activity for the court including: recruitment
and selection of employees for all court
divisions, payroll and benefits, and addresses
issues concerning employee relations. In FY
2002, the department processed over 2,200
applications for 44 vacant positions.
The Superior Court Training Unit
coordinates classes for employees of the court,
as well as for employees in the limited
jurisdiction courts within the county and rural
courts in Southern Arizona. The court hosts 10
classes per month and distributes bulletins
with class descriptions on a monthly basis. In
addition, staff assist with co-hosting classes
with other courts and departments in Southern
Arizona and offer specialized training for
individualized needs.

Facilities Management maintains all of
the physical, spatial, and equipment needs of
the court and ensures compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act, the Office of
Safety and Health Administration, and risk
management procedures and policies. This
year, the department coordinated several
construction and renovation projects focused
on improving court facilities. Court security,
which oversees the safety of court employees,
is also a responsibility of facilities
management.

total probationers were supervised throughout
the year, with a monthly average of 4,094. A
total of 1,100 probationers successfully
completed their probation terms with 327
revocations. Officers collected $3,240,407 in
restitution, fines and fees.

Information
Technology
Services
Division (ITSD)
p r o vid es
and
m a i n t a i n s
computer systems
and applications
in every judicial
division
and
administrative
department of the
court.
One
of
their
primary
responsibilities is
to assist departments in acquiring or
developing automated systems, which aid in
managing cases, enhancing administrative
operations and providing a calendar of court
events.

Intensive Probation Supervision, a
statutorily mandated program, provided highly
structured, control-oriented supervision to
1,023 probationers this year, with officers
supervising an average of 604 per month with
a total of 403 successfully completing the
program. A total of $526,152 in court-ordered
assessments were collected and 147,341 hours
of community service were completed.

The Research and Statistics unit works
under the direction of the ITSD director. The
unit produces management and statistical
reports which are used for short and long
range planning, evaluates existing and
projected demands for services and collects,
analyzes and reports caseload statistics.
The Adult Probation Department has
responsibility for the preparation of all presentence reports on adjudicated defendants, as
well as for supervising those defendants who
are sentenced to probation.
Assessment center officers prepared over
3,500 presentence reports during FY 2002. The
average time from plea to sentencing was
reduced from 31 days to 26.
The Field Supervision Services Division
began the year supervising 3,714 probationers
and ended the year with 4,149. However, 7,863

Interstate Compact Supervision, a
mandated
program,
supervised
397
probationers from other states and 12
interstate compact cases were assumed from
transfers from other Arizona counties.

Calendar

Services

assignment for all cases.

coordinates the
production of the
daily
calendar,
schedules
judges
pro-tem, data entry
regarding cases and
monitors
the
progress of pending
cases.
The court
primarily utilizes an
individual calendar

The Conciliation Court provides a variety
of services to residents of Pima County such as:
mediation services mandated by the court for
custody and time sharing disputes, conciliation
counseling to assist parties considering divorce,
child advocacy services, custody and parenting
time evaluations, and community education
services. In FY
2002, there were
1,100 mediation
cases opened. Of
all
mediation
sessions held 68
percent resulted
in agreement by
both parents on
custody
and/or
parenting time.

Court interpreters serve as impartial
communicators for monolingual parties during court litigation. Interpreters provide assistance in all criminal cases, where requested, and not only serve in the superior
court, but in the justice courts in Tucson, as
well as Green Valley. Additionally, they are
called upon to translate documents into English.
Interpreters also provide services in civil
and domestic cases if the party is representing themselves, or is represented by legal aid
or the county attorney. Regardless of the
type of case, American Sign Language interpreters are provided for parties and jurors
who are hearing-impaired.
Interpreters most frequently provide
translation for Spanish and American Sign
Language; however, per diem interpreters
are available to the court to provide translation in other languages such as Vietnamese,
Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi and Punjabi,
to name a few. In FY 2002 the interpreters
participated in over 6,900 cases held in superior and justice courts.
The jury commissioner summons, qualifies and manages jurors for superior court,
the consolidated justice court, city court and
for county and state grand juries. In FY
2002, there were summons issued for
128,500 prospective jurors for jury and grand
jury service.
Jurors in Pima County serve for one day
or one trial and are not asked to serve again
for at least one year. If impaneled, county
grand jurors serve two days per week for 120
days. State grand jurors serve three days
per month for six months.
The Law Library, mandated by statute,
is open to all citizens in Pima County. Staff
maintain a collection of over 35,000 volumes.
Books, CD’s and other resource materials are
partially funded through civil filing fees collected by the court. Borrowing privileges are
restricted to judges, court personnel and licensed Pima County attorneys. In FY 2002,
the library served over 11,000 patrons.
Pretrial Services (PTS) staff are responsible for screening the suitability for re-

lease of all persons arrested on felony or misdemeanor charges prior to or at the initial appearance hearing.
Staff have the authority to release defendants charged with certain misdemeanor offenses; however, all persons arrested on felony
charges must remain in custody until their initial appearance hearing. Pretrial service staff
members make recommendations to judges for
those defendants detained on felony or misdemeanor charges regarding conditions of release
at initial appearance hearings.
The court may release a defendant into the
custody and supervision of PTS pending trial.
Staff supervise the defendant’s compliance with
court ordered conditions of release and ensure
that each defendant appears for court hearings
as required. During FY 2002, staff screened
over 34,000 arrestees for release and supervised
more than 2,800 defendants awaiting trial.
Court reporters are responsible for taking a verbatim record of court proceedings and transcribing and
certifying the proceeding as
required by court rule or statute. Each retained judge in the superior court
hires their own court reporter; however, a pool
of reporters serves court commissioners and
covers court hearings such as arraignments,
grand jury proceedings, mental health hearings,
orders of protection and preliminary hearings.
A managing court reporter was hired in FY
2002 to oversee pool reporters and coordinate
case assignments.
The clinical liaison works very closely with
the criminal bench judges coordinating competency evaluations for defendants who may not
be competent to stand trial. If a defendant is
found incompetent, the clinical liaison coordinates treatment for the defendant and serves as
a liaison between the court and treatment facilities, the jail and the Department of Corrections.
The Arizona Death Penalty Judicial Assistance Program provides consultation to
trial judges during all stages of capital litigation. The program is funded by an Arizona Supreme Court grant and an in-kind match from
superior court.

The court’s budget for FY 2002 totaled just over $35 million. The court is supported with funds
received from the following sources: Pima County, the State of Arizona, special revenue funds and
grants. The chart below illustrates the level of funding from each of these sources.

Since 1998, court appropriations have increased 26%. This growth is primarily the result of increased special revenue fund collections and the aggressive efforts of staff to obtain additional state
and grant funds. This increase also reflects the successful efforts to acquire additional county funding to establish new judicial divisions warranted by population growth.
The following table illustrates the increases that have occurred during this period for each funding source.

Revenues comprise money collected on
behalf of the court through filing fees and
fees for specific services such as probation.
Revenues are also obtained from intergovernmental agreements for the provision of
services. Such activities include provision of
jurors to Tucson City Court and the operation of the pretrial intake unit at the Pima
County Jail. Expenditures are made from
appropriations derived from Pima County
general funds, special revenue funds, and
grants. As can be seen from the following
charts, since FY 1998 revenues have increased 16.4% and expenditures have increased 22.3%.

Budgeted expenditures totaled $34,545,485
in FY 2002. These can be divided into four
functional categories: 1) judicial services comprising judicial divisions, court support services (e.g., interpreters, medical professional
services, calendar services, conciliation court,
court reporter transcripts, and jury expenses),
and the information technology services division; 2) administrative services which is primarily expenditures related to court administration; 3) adult probation; and 4) pretrial
services.

There was very little change in the overall caseload from FY01 to FY02. As depicted in the charts
below, filings, dispositions and pending caseloads remained fairly constant. Although filings have
increased in some case categories, overall filings have declined the last few years.

FILINGS FY 02
Family law filings comprised 37% of the caseload; the majority
of these filings being marriage dissolutions. Civil filings placed
second, followed by criminal and probate filings.

DISPOSITIONS FY 02
In looking at dispositions, the picture is pretty much the same.
The family law and civil bench disposed of just as many filings
as they took in while the criminal bench disposed of more cases
and probate, too.

PENDING FY 02
Probate cases make up the majority of the pending caseload.
This is primarily a result of estates, trusts, guardianship and
conservatorship cases that typically remain open a long time.
Family law and criminal cases each had 13% share of the
pending caseload, while civil comprised 15%.

The biggest change in case filings occurred in the criminal case category. Filings declined 8%
over last fiscal year. This may be an indication that crime was down or perhaps a result of policy
changes in the county attorneys office. Burglary, robbery and drug cases compromise the majority
of criminal filings.
In FY 02, 78% of the cases were closed by plea and 10% were dismissed. The remaining 12%
went to trial which is quite high compared to national trial statistics.

Although civil filings had been on the decline the last few years, this fiscal year they increased
2%. This is consistent with national trends where litigation appears to be on the rise.
Non-classified civil cases, such as forcible entry and detainer make-up the largest percentage of
civil filings, followed by contract and tort motor vehicle filings.

Family Law case filings decreased 4% over FY 01. Dissolution of marriage filings have been on
the decline since 1995, but comprise 62% of the caseload. Paternity filings which are those matters
involving unmarried couples make up 24% of the caseload.

Probate cases primarily involve estates, trusts, guardianship and converatorship cases. Unlike
other case types there are relatively few new cases filed and few cases disposed per year. Generally
these cases may be pending for years and do not terminate until an individual dies or in the case of
a guardianship, the minor turns 18 years of age

AW

AY

ELEBRATION

Superior court played host, May 3, 2001, to
24 students from the Business/Law Academy
at Amphitheater High School as part of a law
week program designed to inform and educate
students about the court and the legal
profession.
This year’s theme for law day, “Assuring
Equal Justice for All”, focused on efforts to
make equal justice a reality for all citizens.
The students and their instructors were

OURTS

RE

S

ROGRAM

The
Courts-Are-Us
program provides financially
disadvantaged teens with
the opportunity to work in
the court system and other
legal agencies. The program
was
created
by The
Honorable Norman Fenton,
a retired superior court
judge, through the CourtsAre-Us Foundation.

Judge Norman Fenton

Last summer, the court provided positions
for 29 teens who worked in the following
departments: clerk of court, calendar services,
jury services, pretrial services, adult probation
and court administration. Each teen was
supervised by a court employee and provided
an attorney who served as a mentor
throughout the program.
OURTHOUSE
As Hon. Patricia Escher looks on, students are shown the operation
of Court Reporter Rita Borboa’s equipment

welcomed to superior court by Associate
Presiding Judge Kenneth Lee. The students
were then divided into groups and taken to the
courtrooms of Judge Patricia Escher, Judge
Richard Nichols and Judge Frank Dawley to
observe their 9 a.m. calendars. When the
calendars of the judges allowed, they
addressed the students and answered their
questions. The students also were able to get a
closer look at the job of court reporters and
other courtroom staff.

ALLERY

The Courthouse Gallery was dedicated in
December 1997 with a display of artwork
provided by students from Flowing Wells High
School. Since then, numerous high schools
within the Tucson Unified School District have
participated in Courthouse Gallery.

Following their observance of morning
calendars, Judge Leslie Miller fielded
questions about what they had observed, as
well as other questions regarding the court
system.

An entire wall on
the first floor of the
superior
court
building, the area
dedicated for use by
the clerk of the
superior court, has
been set-aside as a
courthouse gallery. Thus, just about everyone
entering the court’s building whether it is for
jury duty or other business has an opportunity
to observe the artwork of these talented young
people.

Finally, the students were presented with a
program which featured topics related to
assuming equal justice in the areas of court
administration,
jury
service,
court
interpretation and the role of the legal
defender.

Artwork from local schools is on display for
two months at the gallery and the students are
honored with a certificate of recognition and a
reception.
They are also provided an
opportunity to tour court facilities, observe
judicial proceedings and ask questions of

DULT

ROBATION

ONORED

The Adult Probation Department’s Literacy,
Education And Resource Network received the
Frank X. Gordon Award, 2002 Adult LEARN
Lab of the Year award from the state’s highest
court.
The
Arizona
Supreme
Court’s
Administrative Office of the Courts recognized
the program’s educators during their annual
conference held April 10, 2002.

(left to right)
Shannon Easterday,
Lindell Rhodes,
Debbie Tinajero,
Susan Barlow,
Kathi Thomas,
Susan Enholm.

The department’s program competed for the
award with 40 labs throughout the state. Pima
County’s program was selected for the award
because of its high level of success documented
through research and testimonials.
Also considered was their innovative usage
of education software, the formation of various
community partnerships, creative funding
approaches, and the tremendous support
received from the superior court bench in Pima
County.
The community service unit of the Adult
Probation Department was honored by the city
of South Tucson,
in March 2002,
for
its
community service
efforts.
Probationers assist-ed
elderly residents
in the cleanup
and
maintenance of their
properties. Since November 2000, more than
60 properties have been serviced, as well as
numerous vacant lots, easements, alleyways
and school grounds.

ENOVATION

ROJECTS

FY 2002 brought long awaited construction
and
building
improvements to
the
courthouse.
Once only shell
space,
construction began on
the third floor to
build three new
courtrooms
and
judges’ chambers. A new courtroom on the third floor .
These courtrooms
were near completion as the fiscal year came to
a close.
A new hearing room in the county
administration building for the board of
supervisors made way for the construction of a
new jury assembly room. The room, complete
with televisions, computers, working tables, and
a lounge, has been well received by jurors.
Construction also began on the second floor to
create new hearing rooms for commissioners and
provide for secured hallways to their chambers
and staff offices.
Offices will be built to
accommodate staff from the Clerk of the Court
as well as court files and evidence storage.
APANESE

URIST

In the spring of 2002,
Judge Hajime Shimada
was a participant in an
international
judicial
e x c h a n ge
program
designed to provide him
with an opportunity to
learn more about a
whole
range
of
situations that we take
for granted in the
American
judicial
system.

ISITS

Judge Hajime Shimada
Hiroshima High Court

Judge Shimada researched and studied the
American judicial system, in particular the jury
system and the role of the public defender in
criminal cases. Upon his return to Japan he
presented a report recommending the
establishment of a jury system in his country.

OMAN

F

HE

EAR

The man and woman of the year program
was established in 1952
by
the
Tucson
Advertising Club to honor
individuals who have
distinguished themselves
through active support of
community projects at
personal sacrifice, for
aiding
those
less
fortunate, and for living
Hon. Leslie Miller
in a manner that inspires
affection and respect.
The Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of
Commerce named Honorable Leslie Miller,
Div. 7, as Tucson’s 2001 Woman of the Year for
her dedication both professionally and
personally to this community.
As a member of the Pima County Superior
Court bench, Judge Miller initiated the Pima
County Drug Court for adults and the
Courthouse Gallery. She serves on the boards
of the Pima County Bar Association, the
YMCA, Boys and Girls Clubs of Tucson, La
Frontera Inc., and the Arizona Association of
Drug Court Professionals.
Judge Miller has also been involved in
activ-ities such as the annual Mariachi
Conference, Concert, and Garibaldi Festival
that support the La Frontera Mental Health
Clinic; the Sean Elliott Steak & Burger
Dinner; and, the Boys and Girls Club Auction.
OLUNTEER

In 1999, the

AWYERS

WARD

James E. Rogers College of
Law
at
the
University
of
Arizona and the
V o l u n t e e r
Lawyers
Program
(VLP)
joined to form
VLP Associates.
The program is funded by the Pima County
Bar Association, Pima County Superior Court
and the Arizona Bar Foundation.

Sixteen volunteer law students were given
the opportunity to assist parties involved in
family law matters. Under the supervision of a
staff attorney, the students reviewed
paperwork for persons seeking child support.
They interviewed parties, reviewed and
corrected child support calculations and made
sure all documents were accurate and in order
prior to the court hearing.
This program has proved valuable to the
court. Prior to this program parties would
often appear in court with incomplete or
inaccurate paperwork which resulted in delays
and inefficiencies.
The VLP expressed its appreciation to the
family law bench at Superior Court for their
part in funding the program. Judge Warner,
presiding judge of the family law bench, and
her predecessor, Judge Jorgenson were
recognized by VLP for their efforts.
ITLE

ROGRAM

Title IV-D enforcement at superior court
faced major changes toward the end of the
fiscal year.
In March, the Pima County Attorney’s
Office received permission from the Board of
Supervisors to end its 26-year affiliation with
the state’s child support enforcement program.
The Arizona Attorney General’s office assumed
those responsibilities in June.
Another change was the inception of the
Responsible Parent Program (“RPP”), a
progressive collaboration between superior
court and local agencies designed to assist
parents to become better able to support their
children. The genesis for the program was the
Loving Parent Program, started by the 2001
National Child Support Commissioner of the
Year, Fred Dardis.
The program is now
managed by Catholic Social Services as part of
their Adelante program.
The focus of the program is to refer noncustodial parents to programs where they can
obtain training or education to assist them to
become better able to pay child support.
Although targeted for non-custodial parents,
some custodial parents have been referred to
the program as well.

This report represents the achievements of over 1,300 employees working for Arizona Superior
Court in Pima County. We extend special thanks to the following individuals for contributing to
this annual report: Kathy Brauer, Suzy Bushman, Andy Dowdle, Kim Holloway, Brenda Kelley,
Doug Kooi, Fred Mitchell, Mike Stafford, and Donna Whitman.
Editor: David Ricker
Co-Editor: Lisa Royal
Co-Editor: Susan Foster
K. Kent Batty
Court Administrator