2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 33 North Stone, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701 AQ 394 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Pima County Board of Supervisors Ally Miller Ramón Valadez Sharon Bronson Raymond Carroll Richard Elías Pima County Administrator Charles H. Huckelberry Pima County Department of Environmental Quality Ursula Nelson Director Richard Grimaldi Deputy Director Air Quality Technical Operations Ted Gould Program Manager Data Collection Group Data Management Group Jim McDonnell, Principal Instrumentation Technician Deborah Jentoft, Data Manager Trinidad Alvarez, Senior Instrumentation & Control Specialist Victor Malkin, Program Specialist Dale Eaton, Senior Principal Instrument & Control Specialist Quality Assurance Group Mike Draper, Data Collection Supervisor TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION Network improvements and anticipated modifications...………………… II. BACKGROUND Regional Evaluation……………………………………………………… Average Daily Traffic (ADT)……………………………………………. Local Geography and Meteorology……………………………………… Definition of Monitoring objective, site types and spatial scales………… Eastern Pima County, Tucson air planning area map…………………….. III. MONITORING SITES SUMMARY AND MAP Active particulate monitoring sites for 2016…………………………… ... Active gaseous monitoring sites for 2016………………………………... PDEQ Ambient Air Monitoring site location map……………………….. Monitoring network descriptive summary tables 2016….……………….. IV. CURRENT MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATIONS PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements ……………………..……………………………… PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements ……………………………………………………... PM 10 -PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements …..……………………………………… O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements …………….…………………………………………… CO Monitoring Network Requirements ……………………………………………………… NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ……………………………………………………. NO y Monitoring Network Requirements ………………………………..…………………… SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ………………………………………………………. Lead Monitoring Network Requirements ……………………………………………………. V. DETAILED SITE AND MONITOR INFORMATION 2 3 5 6 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 17 20 23 24 26 28 30 31 33 35 LIST OF FIGURES / TABLES FIGURES 1. 2. TABLES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Eastern Pima County, Tucson Air Planning Area map……………………… PDEQ Ambient Air monitoring site location map….……………………….. 9 12 Relationship between Monitoring site type and spatial scale represented……………………………………………………………….….. Active particulate monitoring sites for 2016………………………………… Active gaseous monitoring sites for 2016……………………………………. Monitoring Network Descriptive Summary Tables………………………….. 2016 PM 10 Design Criteria…………………………………………………… PM 10 Precision and Accuracy Summary Table………………………………. Collocated PM 10 Monitors …………………………………………………... PM 10 Annual Summary Statistics …………………………………………… 2016 PM 2.5 Design Criteria…………………………………………………… Collocated PM 2.5 Monitors …………………………………………………… PM 2.5 Precision and Accuracy Summary Table………………………………. PM 2.5 Annual Summary Statistics……………………………………………. PM 10 - PM 2.5 Annual Summary Statistics…………………………………….. 2016 Ozone Design Criteria………………………………………………….. Ozone Audit Dates 2016……………………………………………………… Ozone Annual Summary Statistics …………………………………………… 2016 Carbon Monoxide Design Criteria ……………………………………… CO Audit Dates 2016……….……………………………………………….... CO Annual Summary Statistics……………………………………………….. 2016 Nitrogen Dioxide Design Criteria ……………………………………… Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Dates 2013 ………………………………………….. NO 2 Annual Summary Statistics ………………………………………………. NO y Audit Dates 2016 ……………………………………………………….. NO y Annual Summary Statistics……………………………………………… 2016 Sulfur Dioxide Design Criteria …………………………………………. Sulfur Dioxide Audit Dates 2016 …………………………………………….. SO 2 Annual Summary Statistics ………………………………………………. 2016 Lead Design Criteria …………………………………………………….. Lead Precision and Accuracy Summary Table ……………………………….. Lead Annual Summary Statistics ……………………………………………… 8 10 11 13 17 18 18 19 20 20 22 23 23 24 25 25 26 27 27 28 29 29 30 30 31 32 32 33 34 34 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan I. INTRODUCTION This document constitutes the 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Pima County air monitoring network. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) has prepared this document to be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region IX. The purpose of the Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan is to determine if the network is achieving the air monitoring objectives specified in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, which mandate adherence to certain number, type and location requirements of monitoring sites and specific site criteria such as monitoring inlet height. The plan should also determine if modifications should be made to the network (e.g. through the termination or relocation of unnecessary stations or addition of new stations). In addition, the plan is necessary in order to ensure that the residents of Pima County are provided adequate, representative and useful air quality data, and to provide adequate protection to public health. The designated ambient air pollutants monitored and reported by PDEQ are carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O 3 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), lead (Pb), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less in size (PM 10 ) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less in size (PM 2.5 ). This pollutant data is submitted to the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database for determination of compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This report contains statistical data summaries for the 2016 calendar year and provides a site by site assessment of the monitoring network with respect to EPA site criteria. The Pima County monitoring network includes both State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and Special Purpose monitors (SP). SLAMS monitors comprise the required network monitors that are used for NAAQS comparisons and follow the monitoring objectives listed on page 6. SP monitors are used to conduct special purpose studies and to enhance the network coverage of air quality monitoring data. Pima County has a designated National Core (NCore) site at the Children’s Park location, which also monitors for reactive oxides of nitrogen (NO Y ), particulate matter, coarse fraction (PM 10-2.5 ) and speciated PM 2.5 particulate matter. Pima County does not share monitoring responsibilities with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality at this time. Appendix C contains the response letter from EPA for the 2015 Ambient Air Monitoring Plan submitted by PDEQ. 2 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan PDEQ made the following network modifications in 2016: Based on the 2014 EPA Technical System Audit findings, PDEQ made the following changes, effective January, 2016: Re-Classification of PM 10 stations from Special Purpose to SLAMS • Geronimo, Santa Clara, Green Valley and Tangerine Re-Classification of PM 2.5 stations from Special Purpose to OTHER • Geronimo, Green Valley, Rose Elementary and Coachline Began reporting PM 10 collocation data at the Santa Clara station February, 2016 Filter Base PM 2.5 FRM changed from method code 118 to 125 (replacing WINS Impactor with VSSC). Due to continued decreasing ambient concentrations and changes to the NAAQS, PDEQ changed operating ranges on nitrogen dioxide and ozone analyzers to reflect current recommendations for upper range, quality control checks, and span check levels. The nitrogen dioxide analyzer at the 22/Craycroft monitoring station was changed from a 500 ppb range to a 200 ppb range, duplicating the ranges of the nitrogen dioxide and NOy analyzers at the Children’s Park NCore station. Ozone analyzers network-wide underwent changes to operating range, span check and calibration points, as well as one-point QC checks, following recommendations in the QA Handbook, Volume II, Section 10. Pima County DEQ discontinued monitoring of non-source oriented lead at the Children’s Park location in May, 2016. See attachments A and B. PDEQ’s anticipated network modifications in 2017: Also based on the 2014 EPA Technical System Audit findings, PDEQ made the classification change from Special Purpose to SLAMS for the following monitors / stations: • • • Carbon Monoxide / Children’s Park NCore Nitrogen Dioxide / Children’s Park NCore Ozone / Green Valley, Tangerine, Rose Elementary, Coachline and Fairgrounds Install continuous PM 10 FEM monitors at the Orange Grove and South Tucson stations to replace the current FRM samplers. Replace all analog data loggers with digital data loggers at all stations. Relocate the current primary PM 2.5 FRM at the Children’s Park station from the existing platform to the roof of the shelter, and change its designation from primary to collocation. 3 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Change the designation of the PM 2.5 FEM continuous sampler at the Children’s Park station from non-primary to primary. Install continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor at the Orange Grove station to replace the current FRM sampler. Relocate the PM coarse PM 10 – PM 2.5 sampler at the Children’s Park station from the existing platform to the roof of the shelter. Continue impact analysis of development near the Tangerine ozone and PM10 monitoring station, and if necessary change the station spatial scale and site type to correspond with changes to area development. Near-Road Monitoring Integral to revised minimum monitoring requirements for nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) promulgated in February, 2010, state and local air monitoring agencies are required to install near-road NO 2 monitoring stations at locations where peak hourly NO 2 concentrations are expected to occur within the near-road environment in larger urban areas. Implementation of this requirement involves a three-phased approach, with initial installations in areas with populations greater than 1,000,000 to be completed by January 1, 2014. The second phase requires areas with 1) populations greater than 2,500,000 or, 2) populations greater than 500,000 with one or more roadway segments having 250,000 or greater Average Daily Traffic count to be completed by January 1, 2015. The third phase requires areas with populations greater than 500,000 but less than 1,000,000 to complete installations by January 1, 2017. With most installations of phase one and two monitoring stations complete, and sufficient NO 2 data reported to ascertain with some certainty the concentration levels of NO 2 in the near-road environment, it has been determined that measured NO 2 levels are lower than expected, and in some cases, lower than neighborhood locations in the same urban areas. In light of this information, the logical course of action is to cancel installations of phase three monitoring stations, which is what EPA has done (Federal Register / Volume 81, No 251 / December 30, 2016). Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) above a population of one million are still required to install a near-road NO 2 station. Current population estimates place the Tucson CBSA over one million, which triggers the requirement for a near-road station. The Tucson CBSA is one of only two in the nation to cross over a population demarcation during the course of the implementation phases, and guidance for implementation has not been developed. PDEQ acknowledges the requirement to install a near-road station, but lacks the resources to complete the installation, which will be difficult and costly. The station must be located within 50 meters of a heavily travelled road, which in the case of Tucson, means beside a freeway. This will involve extensive logistical planning and permitting. A plan is currently under development, but implementation will require funding, which is uncertain, in view of budget cuts under consideration at the federal level. 4 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan General comment regarding monitoring station siting criteria: The locations of monitoring stations in the PDEQ network require considerable planning to conform to all of the siting requirements specified in 40 CFR 58 Appendix E. Locations are chosen only after carefully considering the intent and installation logistics of each station. Some stations remain static, and easily maintain all siting criteria, and others fall victim to urban evolution and nature. Development happens and trees grow, modifying the original circumstances. Development can change those circumstances to the point that relocation or designation change of a station is required. Tree growth is more forgivable in that it can be modified by removal or trimming, but sometimes this is not possible for a number of reasons. Going to the effort of relocating a station because of tree growth is not generally practical. Modifying the station information to categorize trees as an obstruction is preferable, as long as siting criteria still meets the minimum requirements for obstructions. Most of the trees near PDEQ monitoring stations are typical of Sonoran Desert indigenous species, namely mesquite and palo verde, both of which have small, relatively sparse leaves, and in most cases do not totally block airflow, or provide large surfaces for particulate deposition. However, PDEQ has several stations that have been compromised by substantial tree growth, and in each section for those stations, the category for degrees of unrestricted airflow will reflect the reality of tree growth at those stations, and the obstructed airflow will be identified by direction in degrees. II. BACKGROUND Pima County Air Quality Control District met all the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in 2016. Concentrations of the criteria pollutants have been stable over the past few years with ozone and particulate matter (PM 10 ) being the major concern for Pima County. Ozone has been very close to the standard, often within 95% of the standard. Particulate matter (PM 10 ) levels are elevated during drought conditions and high winds which have caused exceedances of the NAAQS. Regional Evaluation In order to evaluate existing and proposed monitoring stations and their stated objectives, regional information is used. The regional information consists of the most current values for population, major urban developments and directions of growth, traffic and highway data, major industries and aerial photographs showing topography. Population (census tract) data can act as a guide in evaluation of the representativeness of a site for determining population exposure. The 2010 census shows Pima County population at 980,263 and the city of Tucson population at 520,116. Figure 1 on page 9 illustrates the Eastern Pima County Tucson Air Planning Area (TAPA). The various incorporated areas and other agency lands are shown, as well as the named mountain peaks that define the planning area for Eastern Pima County, which includes the Tucson Metropolitan area. The Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area( MSA) has incurred a population increase of approximately 2.5% since the 2010 census, based on 2015 estimates by the US Census Bureau. 5 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Traffic data is necessary for site evaluations since a large portion of air pollutants in the Tucson basin are caused by vehicular traffic. Traffic volumes and density maps are used in evaluating the monitoring network. This data is routinely compiled and used by local transportation and planning agencies. An analysis of the most current traffic data indicates that the network continues to meet the requirements for the monitoring site type and corresponding spatial scales as initially established. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) numbers are 24 - hour, two - way volume of averaged weekday traffic. Latitude and Longitude Latitude and Longitude data is also provided for the monitoring sites using Datum WGS84 AZ Central in Decimal.Degrees. Local Geography and Meteorology Tucson, Arizona is a major metropolitan area situated in the Santa Cruz river valley, which is encompassed by the Sonoran Desert at an elevation between 2300 and 2800 feet. Basin and range topography characterizes the region with rugged mountain ranges encircling the valley floor with mountain peak elevations in excess of 9000 feet, thus delineating the Tucson Air Planning Area. The flat or gently rolling valley terrain slopes from the higher south and southeast toward the lower northwest following the Santa Cruz river drainage. The climate of Tucson is characterized by a hot season normally starting in April and ending in October, and a generally mild winter. Maximum daily temperatures from May through September are usually above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The average rainfall is around eleven inches per year. Tucson International Airport records show an average of 240 clear days a year (days with less than 50% total cloud cover). The remaining periods include the winter prefrontal situations more common in the north and the prolonged seasons of convective summer storms. Wind velocity and direction changes, associated with the large scale pressure systems, frequently result in localized dust storms. The mountain-valley circulation, along with surface heating during the day and radiational cooling at night, create a predominantly southeast to northwest wind path in the basin. Airflows generally tend to be downvalley (from the southeast) at night and early morning hours, reversing to the upvalley direction (from the northwest) during the day. These downvalley / upvalley flows are strongly influenced by localized upslope / downslope terrain. The normal upvalley airflow is from the northwest, and parallels the Santa Cruz River, but decays well before sunset. This is followed by an hour of light, erratic flows which turn into the downvalley flow from the southeast, and reach their maximum and stabilized speed in four to six hours. The air temperature drops steadily during this interval until the sun rises. The downvalley direction continues for two to five hours past sunrise and then transforms into a short calm period prior to the change to upvalley flows. The southeasterly “monsoon” regime that occurs primarily in the months of July and August is a large scale synoptic feature with considerable yearly variation both in intensity and timing. At the Tucson International Airport, the winds become strong, gusty and southeasterly with high relative humidity, cloud cover and frequent thunderstorms. The mountain – valley circulation tends to be suppressed during this time period. 6 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Atmospheric temperature inversions occur almost daily in the Tucson air basin. During the winter months these inversions may become severe with particulate and other pollutants becoming concentrated, remaining near the ground level causing haze. When the sun sets, the ground and surface air cools faster than the air several hundred feet above the surface. Since air temperature normally decreases with increasing altitude, the warm and cool layers are reversed or “inverted”, hence the name ‘temperature inversion’. These temperature inversions are usually strongest on cold, clear winter nights, where there is an absence of cloud cover. Consequently, the inversions “lock” the pollutants near the surface. As the sun causes the cool air layer close to the ground to warm up, vertical mixing and horizontal transport disperse the air pollutants. In the early evening, the low level air inversion begins to form again and often coincides with the evening traffic rush hour. Definition of Monitoring Objectives, Site Types and Spatial Scales The Pima County ambient air monitoring network is designed to meet three basic monitoring objectives. These objectives listed in Appendix D, 1.1 of 40 CFR Part 58 are: ♦ To provide air pollution data to the general public in a timely manner; ♦ To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS; ♦ To support research studies. The monitoring stations which comprise the Pima County network are designed to meet at least one of six basic monitoring site types. As listed in Appendix D, 1.1.1 of 40 CFR Part 58, the site types: ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Determine the area of highest concentrations expected to occur in the network; Determine representative concentrations in areas of high population density; Determine the impact on ambient pollution levels of significant sources or source categories; Determine general background concentration levels; Determine the extent of regional pollution transport among populated areas; Determine the welfare – related impact in more rural and remote areas. The link between general monitoring objectives, site types and the geographical location of a monitoring station is defined as the spatial scale of representativeness, and the relationship is indicated in Table 1 (next page). The goal of each station is to represent a specific air parcel throughout which actual pollution concentrations are reasonably homogeneous. The spatial scales are defined in Appendix D, 1.2 of 40 CFR Part 58 as follows: ♦ Microscale defines concentrations in air volumes associated with area dimensions from 1 meter to 100 meters; ♦ Middle Scale defines concentrations typical of areas from 100 meters to 500 meters; ♦ Neighborhood Scale defines concentrations typical of areas with dimensions in the 0.5 to 4.0 kilometer range; 7 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan ♦ Urban Scale defines the overall, city – wide conditions with dimensions in the 4 to 50 kilometer range; ♦ Regional Scale usually defines a rural area with dimensions as much as hundreds of kilometers; ♦ National and Global Scales represent concentrations which characterize nations and the globe as a whole (Pima County does not employ stations under this category). Table 1 Monitoring Site Types Highest Concentration Population Source Impact General / Background Regional Transport Welfare-Related Impacts Appropriate Spatial Scales Micro, Middle, Neighborhood, sometimes Urban Neighborhood, Urban Micro, Middle, Neighborhood Urban, Regional Urban, Regional Urban, Regional 8 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan III. PIMA COUNTY AIR QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK SUMMARY TABLES AND MAP Active Particulate Monitoring Sites for 2016 Map # Table 2 Address Pollutant 4 PM 10 5 2498 N. Geronimo Geronimo PM 10 1601 S. 6th Ave. South Tucson 8 PM 10 Corona de Tucson 9 PM 10 10 PM 10 PM 2.5 22000 S. Houghton Rd. 6910 S. Santa Clara Ave. 601 N. La Canada Dr. PM 2.5 400 W. River Rd. PM 2.5 3401 W. Orange Grove Rd. 12101 N. Camino de Oeste 710 W. Michigan Children’s Park NCore Orange Grove 11 12 PM 10 13 PM 10 PM 2.5 Site Name 14 PM 2.5 15 PM 2.5 9597 N. Coachline Blvd. Map located on Page 12 10 Santa Clara School Green Valley Tangerine Rose Elementary Coachline 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Active Gaseous Pollutant Monitoring Sites for 2016 Table 3 Address Map # Pollutant 2 CO 3 CO 10 11 O3 NO 2 O3 CO O3 SO 2 NO 2 NO Y Site Name 1237 S. Beverly Ave. 22nd & Craycroft 3895 E. 22nd St. 22nd & Alvernon 601 N. La Canada Dr. Green Valley 400 W. River Rd. Children’s Park NCore 13 O3 12101 N. Camino de Oeste Tangerine 14 O3 710 W. Michigan Rose Elementary 15 O3 9597 N. Coachline Blvd. Coachline 2745 N. Cherry Ave. Cherry & Glenn 16 CO 17 O3 11330 S. Houghton Rd. Fairgrounds 18 O3 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Saguaro National Park, East Golf Links & Kolb 23 CO 2601 S. Kolb Rd. Map located on page 12 11 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Summary Table Table 4 CARBON MONOXIDE - PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) PARAMETER (b) 22ND & CRAYCROFT 04-019-1011 42101 CLASSIFICATION (c) DATES (d) SLAMS Jul-73 04-019-1014 42101 SLAMS 04-019-1028 42101 SLAMS SMPL FREQ (i) POC (j) MONITORING SITE TYPE (h) 158/054 2582 4.4 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Mar-75 174/054 2516 3.8 MICROSCALE CONTINUOUS 1 HIGHEST CONCENTRATION Oct-98 554 2286 4.25 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 54 2400 4.9 NEIGHBORHOOD Cont/Seasonal 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 1 HIGHEST CONCENTRATION PRESENT 400 W. RIVER ROAD CHERRY & GLENN SPATIAL SCALE (h) PRESENT 3895 E.22ND STREET CHILDREN'S PARK NCore ELEV. SMPL FEET (f) HEIGHT (M) (g) PRESENT 1237 S. BEVERLY AVE. 22ND & ALVERNON METHOD (e) 04-019-1021 42101 SP Feb-89 PRESENT 2745 N. CHERRY AVE. Jan. 1 –March31 Oct. 1- Dec. 31 GOLF LINKS & KOLB 04-019-1031 42101 SP Sept-02 54 2661 3 MICROSCALE PRESENT 2601 SOUTH KOLB Cont/Seasonal Jan. 1 –March31 Oct. 1- Dec. 31 NITROGEN DIOXIDE - PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) PARAMETER (b) 22ND & CRAYCROFT 04-019-1011 42602 CLASSIFICATION (c) DATES (d) SLAMS Jan-73 ELEV. SMPL SPATIAL FEET (f) HEIGHT SCALE (h) (M) (g) SMPL FREQ (i) POC (j) MONITORING SITE TYPE (h) 157/074 2582 4.4 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 090/074 2286 4.25 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 HIGHEST CONCENTRATION PRESENT 1237 S. BEVERLY AVE. CHILDREN'S PARK NCore METHOD (e) 04-019-1028 42602 SLAMS May-98 PRESENT 400 W. RIVER ROAD REACTIVE OXIDES OF NITROGEN - PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK CHILDREN'S PARK NCore 400 W. RIVER ROAD 04-019-1028 42600 SLAMS Oct-10 674 PRESENT Key located on page 16 13 2286 10.0 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Summary Table SULFUR DIOXIDE -PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) PARAMETER CLASSI(b) FICATION (c) DATES (d) CHILDREN'S PARK NCore 04-019-1028 Oct-10 42401 SLAMS METHOD (e) ELEV. SMPL FEET (f) HEIGHT (M) (g) 560 2286 4.25 SPATIAL SCALE (h) SMPL FREQ (i) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS POC (j) MONITORING SITE TYPE (h) 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE PRESENT 400 W. RIVER ROAD OZONE -PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) PARAMETER CLASSI(b) FICATION (c) 22ND & CRAYCROFT 04-019-1011 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1030 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1028 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1018 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1032 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1034 44201 SLAMS 04-019-1020 44201 SLAMS 3905 S. OLD SPANISH TRAIL 4.4 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE July-03 047 2910 3.3 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Sep-97 047 2286 4.25 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Oct-89 047 2638 3.75 URBAN CONTINUOUS 1 HIGHEST CONCENTRATION July-03 047 2387 4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE July-03 047 2110 3.4 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Oct-89 047 3078 3.6 URBAN CONTINUOUS 1 BACKGROUND 047 3089 4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 MAXIMUM OZONE CONCENTRATION PRESENT 11330 S. HOUGHTON RD. SAGUARO NATIONAL PARK 2582 PRESENT 9597 N. COACHLINE BLVD FAIRGROUNDS 047 PRESENT 710 W. MICHIGAN COACHLINE POC (j) MONITORING SITE TYPE (h) PRESENT 12101 N. CAMINO DE OESTE ROSE ELEMENTARY SMPL FREQ (i) PRESENT 400 W. RIVER ROAD TANGERINE SPATIAL SCALE (h) PRESENT 601 N. LA CANADA DR. CHILDREN'S PARK NCore Jul-73 METHOD (e) ELEV. SMPL FEET (f) HEIGHT (M) (g) PRESENT 1237 S. BEVERLY AVE. GREEN VALLEY DATES (d) 04-019-0021 44201 SLAMS Jun-82 PRESENT Key located on page 16 14 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Summary Table PM10- PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) PARAMETER (b) CLASSI- DATES (d) FICATION (c) GERONIMO 04-019-1113 SLAMS 81102 04-019-1001 81102 SLAMS 1601 S. 6TH AVE. CORONA DE TUCSON 04-019-0008 81102 SLAMS 04-019-1026 81102 SLAMS 6910 S. SANTA CLARA AVE. GREEN VALLEY 04-019-1030 81102 SLAMS 04-019-0011 81102 SLAMS 3401 W. ORANGE GROVE RD. TANGERINE POC (j) MONITORING SITE TYPE (h) 122 2452 4.6 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Sep-88 127 2420 6.9 NEIGHBORHOOD 1 DAY 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE PRESENT 127 collocated every 6 day 2 Mar-87 126 3078 2.1 REGIONAL 6 DAY 1 BACKGROUND 2540 6.45 NEIGHBORHOOD 6 DAY 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE Jul-94 126 PRESENT 126 Feb-01 122 2910 4.25 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 2234 2.65 NEIGHBORHOOD 1 DAY 2 HIGHEST CONCENTRATION collocated every 6 day 4 6 DAY 1 BACKGROUND 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE collocated every 12 day PRESENT 601 N. LA CANADA DR. ORANGE GROVE SMPL FREQ (i) PRESENT 22000 S. HOUGHTON RD. SANTA CLARA June- 07 SPATIAL SCALE (h) PRESENT 2498 N. GERONIMO SOUTH TUCSON METHOD (e) ELEV. SMPL FEET (f) HEIGHT (M) (g) 04-019-1018 81102 SLAMS Jan-85 127 PRESENT 127 Jan-94 126 2638 4 .5 URBAN PRESENT 12101 N. CAMINO DE OESTE LEAD -PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK CHILDREN'S PARK NCore 04-019-1028 14129 SLAMS Feb-12 110 2286 2.0 NEIGHBORHOOD 6DAY May-16 400 W. RIVER ROAD 110 Collocated every 12 days 2 CHEMICAL SPECIATION -PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK CHILDREN'S PARK NCore 400 W. RIVER ROAD 04-019-1028 88502 SLAMS Feb-02 810 PRESENT 15 2286 3.0 3 DAY 5 POPULATION EXPOSURE 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Summary Table PM2.5- PIMA COUNTY MONITORING NETWORK SITE NAME AND LOCATION SITE ID (a) GERONIMO 04-019-1113 PARAMETER (b) 88501 CLASSI- DATES (d) METHOD (e) ELEV. SMPL FICATION FEET (f) HEIGHT (c) (M) (g) SPATIAL SCALE (h) OTHER July-03 SMPL FREQ (i) POC MONITORING (j) SITE TYPE (h) 733 2452 4.6 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 3 POPULATION EXPOSURE 733 2910 4.8 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 3 POPULATION EXPOSURE 2286 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD 3 DAY 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 2 PRESENT 2498 N. GERONIMO 04-019-1030 GREEN VALLEY 88501 OTHER 601 N. LA CANADA DR. CHILDREN'S PARK NCore 04-019-1028 88101 SLAMS 400 W. RIVER ROAD CHILDREN’S PARK NCore July-03 PRESENT 04-019-1028 88101 SLAMS Jan-99 118 PRESENT 118 Jan-11 170 2286 4.3 collocated every 6 day NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 118 2234 2.65 NEIGHBORHOOD 3 DAY 1 POPULATION EXPOSURE 733 2387 4.9 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 3 POPULATION EXPOSURE 733 2100 4.9 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTINUOUS 3 POPULATION EXPOSURE 3 POPULATION EXPOSURE PRESENT 400 W. RIVER ROAD 04-019-0011 ORANGE GROVE 88101 SLAMS 04-019-1032 ROSE ELEMENTARY Jan-99 PRESENT 3401 W. ORANGE GROVE RD. 88501 OTHER July-03 PRESENT 710 W. MICHIGAN 04-019-1034 COACHLINE 9597 N. COACHLINE BLVD Key: 88501 OTHER July-03 PRESENT a - Site ID - site identification code used in the AQS database b - Parameter - code used in the AQS database to describe the pollutant monitored c - Classification – described on page 2 d - Dates - dates sampling began and ended e - Method - code used in the AQS database indicating the type of instrument used f - Elev. feet - site elevation in feet g - SPL (M) Height - sample inlet height in meters, specific height range required for uniform collection h - Spatial Scale and Monitoring site type - described on page 6 i - SMPL Freq - frequency of sampling days j - POC - parameter occurrence code used to distinguish between two or more instruments measuring the same parameter at the same time Information provided based on EPA'S 2016 Air Quality System (AQS) data. 16 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan IV. CURRENT MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATIONS PM 10 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS The PDEQ PM 10 network consists of seven monitoring sites in eastern Pima County, Arizona. The 2016 network used several different types of PM 10 samplers: R& P Partisol 2000, R& P Partisol-Plus 2025 Sequential and BAM 1020. 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.6 Particulate matter (PM 10 ) design criteria, provided guidance in determining the minimum number of required PM 10 SLAMS sites for 2016. 2016 PM 10 Design Criteria Table 5 Population Pima County 2010 Census 980,263 MSA 8520 Tucson Population Category 500,000 – 1,000,000 Max Concentration site 2014-2016 Geronimo Max Concentration (µg/m3 ) PM 10 Sites # Required PM 10 Sites # Operating 99 Requires 1-2 SLAMS monitors 7 SLAMS monitors a 2015 Estimated >1,000,000 2-4 SLAMS Population 1,010,025 monitors a. U.S. Census Bureau 2015 population estimate of the Tucson area (MSA 8520) is 1,010,025. Violation History The PM 10 24 hour standard remains at 150 µg/m3. Since the promulgation of the PM 10 standard, July 31, 1987, there has been one violation of the standard. In 1999, the PM 10 standard was violated with four recorded exceedances at the Orange Grove location and two exceedances at the South Tucson location. Subsequently, the monitoring schedules for the Orange Grove and South Tucson locations have been changed from every six day sampling to every day sampling, as indicated in 40 CFR Part 50, app. K and 40 CFR Part 58.13. Exceedances of the 24 hour standard have been recorded at monitoring sites in the PDEQ PM 10 network at the following locations: In 2013, one exceedance on April 8th at the South Tucson location and on April 9th there was one exceedance each, at the South Tucson, Geronimo, and Green Valley stations. These exceedances may also be considered as an Exceptional Event dependent on approval from EPA. In 2014, there were three exceedances on July 25 at the Green Valley, Geronimo, Orange Grove monitoring sites. These exceedances may also be considered as an Exceptional Event dependent on approval from EPA. In 2015 and 2016, there were no recorded exceedances for PM 10 . 17 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Quality Assurance for Particulate Matter PM 10 All data quality assessment requirements, as outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met for 2016. The precision of PM 10 data is derived from the co-located PM 10 samplers at the South Tucson, Santa Clara and Orange Grove sites; the difference in concentration between the two samplers running side-by-side is used to calculate the precision of the data. At the end of each calendar quarter, a combined precision probability interval for monitors is calculated by EPA. The accuracy of PM 10 sampling is assessed by auditing the flow rate of at least 25% of the samplers each calendar quarter, such that each sampler is audited at least once per year. The difference in the flow rate between the audit flow measurement and the flow indicated by the sampler is used to calculate accuracy. Protocol Flow rate verification Flow Rate Audit Flow rate verification Flow Rate Audit Instrument Met One BAM 1020 R&P TEOM 1400 Bam 1020 Table 6 Frequency Date Completed 2016 Weekly Green Valley 03/17, 06/17, 09/14, 12/05 Semi Annually R& P Partisol 2000, Monthly R& P Partisol-Plus 2025 Sequential R& P Partisol 2000, Semi R& P Partisol-Plus Annually 2025 Sequential Geronimo 03/18, 06/21, 09/16, 12/06 Corona de Tucson 03/18, 06/10, 09/14, 12/01 Santa Clara 03/17, 06/21, 09/14, 12/16 Santa Clara (co-located) 03/17, 06/21, 09/14, 12/16 Tangerine 03/21, 06/22, 09/13, 12/06 South Tucson 03/18, 06/13, 09/16, 12/16 South Tucson (co-located) 03/18, 06/20, 09/16, 12/16 Orange Grove 03/15, 06/13, 09/13, 12/06 Orange Grove (co-located) 03/15, 06/13, 09/13, 12/06 NPAP Audit None Method 81102 Table 7 Collocated PM 10 Monitors # Required # Primary Collocation Monitors Monitors 1 7 18 # Collocated Monitors 3 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Table 8 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS: 150 µg/m3 24- Hour Average. Orange Grove 0011 83 2nd Annual Highest Average 24-Hour Value 56 23.4 Corona de Tucson 0008 Santa Clara 1026 45 29 15.2 53 42 22.9 Green Valley 1030 Geronimo 1113 63 57 18.4 99 67 24.8 Tangerine 1018 South Tucson 1001 54 34 17.7 80 74 24.5 Highest 24- Hr Value Year 2016 Site Particulate Matter Weigh Lab Pima County Department of Environmental Quality operates a filter weigh lab for the processing of Pima County’s PM 10 and PM 2.5 network filters, excluding PM 2.5 speciation filters. This weigh lab follows all requirements set forth in Appendix L of 40 CFR Part 50. Sampling Schedule Calculation The design value for the Tucson area network was determined using the PM 10 SIP Development Guideline, Section 6.3.1 “Table look-up” procedure. Three years of sampling data, 2014 – 2016, were used. For that period, the Geronimo monitoring location was determined to have the highest design value (including possible exceptional events). That value was 113µg/m3. The ratio of this value to the 24 hour standard of 150 µg/m3, .76, was then compared to the brackets in Figure 1 from 40 CFR 58.12(e) to arrive at a minimum PM 10 sampling frequency of every sixth day. Geronimo is a continuous monitor sampling site. 19 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan PM 2.5 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS The PDEQ PM 2.5 network consists of six monitoring sites in eastern Pima County, Arizona, 40 CFR Part 58.20, App. D. 4.7. PM 2.5 design criteria provided guidance on the required number of SLAMS monitors. Two SLAMS Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitors were initiated in January, 1999 at the Orange Grove and Children’s Park sites. In addition to two FRM SLAMS monitors, Pima County operates an FEM SLAMS continuous monitor, and four non- regulatory continuous monitors. Population Pima County 2016 PM 2.5 Design Criteria Table 9 PM2.5 SLAMS (FRM and FEM) MSA 8520 Design Value Annual Daily PM 2.5 Sites Tucson Site Design Design # Required Population Value Value Category Years Years 201420142016 2016 2010 Census 980,263 500,000 – 1,000,000 2015 Estimated Population 1,010,025 Orange Grove 5.8µg/m3 >1,000,000 Method 88101 Method 118 15µg/m3 Requires 1 SLAMS monitor <85% of NAAQS Requires 2 SLAMS monitors PM 2.5 Sites # Operating 2 SLAMS monitors Table 10 Collocated PM 2.5 Monitors # Required Collocation # Primary Monitors Monitors # Collocated Monitors 1 1 2 General Statement regarding changes to the PM 2.5 network: PDEQ does not have any violating monitors or proposals to move or change any monitors at this time. In the event of proposed changes to the PM 2.5 network or violating monitors, PDEQ would detail all information and present it to the public for comment and would forward all comments and information to EPA for approval. After approval, PDEQ would then initiate any changes. 20 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Regional Transport or Background: ADEQ operates an FEM monitor at their Alamo Lake site for regional background, and an FEM monitor at their Yuma Supersite for regional transport. The PDEQ SLAMS FRM monitors are filter-based low-volume samplers that collect a sample for 24 hours on a 1 in 3 day cycle. A co-located sampler at the Children’s Park NCore site runs on a 1 in 6 day cycle for precision assessment. Continuous PM 2.5 monitoring was initiated in May, 2000 at the Green Valley site using Beta Mass Attenuation (Met One BAM 1020) and a sharp-cut cyclone. This installation was a pilot project and was followed by similar installations at the Rose Elementary and Coachline monitoring sites. All three sites were a part of the EMPACT project (Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking), designed to provide near real-time data to the public via the internet and PDEQ web pages. A fourth monitor was added at the Geronimo site to provide fine particulate data for AQI reporting. These monitors provide automatic concentration measurement on an hourly basis, and output the reading to the site data logger, which is then polled every hour, and the data posted on the PDEQ website. The PM 2.5 monitors at these four sites are operated as non-regulatory, intended only to provide information to the public. They are operated under the same Quality Control and Quality Assurance protocols as regulatory monitors to assure meaningful data are provided, but they are operated using alternative instrument settings (50 minute sample, 4 minute count time) that do not conform to FEM designation parameters for PM 2.5 . This setting does not compromise the accuracy of the readings, and is inherent in the original design and designation of all FEM PM 10 BAM 1020 monitors. The data obtained by FRM, continuous, FEM and non-regulatory monitors in Tucson are submitted quarterly to the EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) database. Pima County Department of Environmental Quality operates a filter weigh lab for the processing of Pima County’s PM 10 and PM 2.5 network filters, excluding PM 2.5 speciation filters. This weigh lab follows all requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 50, App. L. The PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Trends Network was established by EPA in 1999 to determine the chemical speciation of fine particulates. PM 2.5 speciation monitoring began in Pima County at the Children’s Park location in February, 2002. The samples are analyzed for forty eight elements, cations, nitrate, sulfate, organic and elemental carbon. Analysis and reporting is completed by RTI International. Violation History The PM 2.5 standard (December 14, 2012): the annual PM 2.5 standard is met when the three year average of the spatially averaged annual mean is less than or equal to 12ug/m3 and the 24 hour standard is met when the three year average of the 98th percentile value at each site is less than or equal to 35ug/m3. No exceedances of the annual or 24 - hour NAAQS were recorded in Tucson in 2016. 21 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Quality Assurance for Particulate Matter PM2.5 All data quality assessment requirements as outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A have been met in 2016, and include both internal and EPA PEP audits, and the co-located sampler at the Children’s Park NCore site. The accuracy of PM 2.5 sampling is assessed by auditing the flow rate every six months. The difference in the flow rate between the audit flow measurement and the flow indicated by the sampler is used to calculate accuracy. A combined accuracy probability interval is calculated for PM 2.5 along with separate probability limits for each audit concentration level for automated analyzers. Pima County reports the results of all valid precision and accuracy tests on a quarterly basis to the Air Quality System (AQS) database. Table 11 Protocol Flow rate verification Flow Rate Audit Instrument Met One BAM 1020 Frequency Weekly Date Completed 2016 Met One BAM 1020 Semi Annually Green Valley 03/17, 06/17, 09/14, 12/05 Geronimo 03/18, 06/21, 09/16, 12/06 Rose Elementary 03/17, 06/17, 09/14, 12/05 Coachline 03/21, 06/22, 09/13, 12/06 Children’s Park 03/22, 06/27, 09/16, 12/16 Flow rate verification R& P Partisol-Plus 2025 Sequential R & P 2000 R& P Partisol-Plus 2025 Sequential R& P 2000 (Co- located) Met One SASS (Speciation) URG – 3000N (Speciation) Monthly Flow Rate Audit Orange Grove 03/15, 06/13, 09/13, 12/06 Children’s Park 03/15, 06/27, 09/16, 12/16 Children’s Park (Co-located) 03/15, 06/27, 09/16,12/16 Children’s Park (Speciation, SASS) 03/15,06/27, 09/16, 12/19 Children’s Park (Speciation, URG) 03/15, 06/27, 09/16, 12/19 Semi Annually NPAP Audit Children’s Park Met One BAM 1020 2/17, Children’s Park R& P Partisol-Plus 2025 11/14, Orange Grove 11/14 22 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Table 12 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS PM 2.5 : 12 µg/m3 Annual Average, 35 µg/m3 24 Hour Average. Highest 24 HR Value 2nd Highest Value 98th % Annual Value Average Orange Grove 27.9 21.3 19.2 6.3 Children’s Park (Meth. 145) 18.4 17.5 13.3 5.8 Children’s Park (Meth. 170) 22 13 10.3 4.4 Green Valley 14 13 14 5.0 Geronimo 39 18 19 5.3 Rose Elementary 35 16 22 7.8 Coachline 34 16 19 6.7 Year 2016 Site PM 10 - 2.5 (PM-Coarse) MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Pima County is monitoring for PM- Coarse at the Children’s Park NCore station as part of the monitoring requirements for an NCore station. PM-Coarse is the arithmetic difference between separate but concurrent collocated measurements of PM 10 and PM 2.5 , also referred to as PM 10-2.5 . Pima County is following the requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 50, App O. The collocation for PM 10-2.5 is fulfilled by the national NCore Network. The PM 10-2.5 is described on page 39. Year 2016 Children’s Park NCore PM10 - PM2.5 (86101) Table 13 PM-Coarse Annual summary statistics Highest 24- HR 2nd Highest 24Value Hour Value 62 30 23 Annual Average 12.41 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan OZONE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Ozone (O 3 ) is currently being monitored at seven locations in Tucson and one location in Green Valley. Pima County monitors year round for ozone. EPA has revised the minimum monitoring requirements for ozone. The design criteria for ozone monitoring is described in 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, Table D-2. Population MSA 8520 Pima Tucson County Population Category 2010 Census 980,263 2015 Estimated Population 1,010,025 500,000 – 1,000,000 Table 14 2016 O 3 Design Criteria Design Value 8- Hour Design Site Value (2014-2016) Saguaro Park 040190021 .068 ppm >1,000,000 O 3 Sites # Required O 3 Sites # Operating Requires 2 SLAMS monitors 8 SLAMS monitors Same requirement Violation History On October 26, 2015, EPA strengthened the ozone standard from 0.075 ppm to 0.070 ppm, keeping the form of the standard as the three year average of the fourth highest daily maximum eight hour average ozone concentration. The secondary standard is identical to the primary standard. Pima County has not violated the ozone standard in 2016. Quality Assurance for Ozone All data quality assessment requirements outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met in 2016. The requirements include precision checks a minimum of every other week with a check gas range between 0.01 and 0.10 ppm with Pima County performing the precision check at 0.075 ppm and changing to 0.070 in October, representing the highest level we are likely to achieve. The annual internal audits for accuracy are performed with four point check levels at zero, 0.035ppm, 0.055ppm, and 0.085ppm. Pima County maintains an ozone primary standard which is verified annually for accuracy by the California Air Resources Board in Sacramento.. All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. 24 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan OZONE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Table 15 Ozone Audit Dates 2016 22nd St. & Craycroft 6/03, 12/8 Children’s Park 3/11, 9/22 Fairgrounds 6/18, 12/16 Tangerine 6/10, 12/01 Saguaro Park 6/10, 12/01 Coachline 3/21, 9/13 Rose Elementary 6/17, 12/05 Green Valley 6/17, 12/05 NPAP Ozone TTP Audit Dates 2016 None Table 16 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS: 0.070 ppm 4th highest 8- Hour Average Year 2016 Site 22nd St. & Craycroft 1011 Children’s Park 1028 Fairgrounds 1st Max. 1-HR 1st Max. Avg (ppm) 8- HR Avg (ppm) .072 .063 4th Max. 8- HR Avg (ppm) .061 .070 .065 .063 .077 .068 .066 .072 .067 .064 .080 .072 .069 .067 .063 .060 .078 .070 .066 .074 .070 .066 1020 Tangerine 1018 Saguaro Park 0021 Coachline 1034 Rose Elementary 1032 Green Valley 1030 25 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan CARBON MONOXIDE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Carbon Monoxide is monitored at five locations throughout the eastern Pima County. The revised requirements for Carbon Monoxide 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.2 state that there is no minimum number of CO monitoring sites required. Pima County is operating under the auspices of the CO Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) and has maintained the same number of sites in order to meet and exceed the requirements of the LMP. Population Pima County 2010 Census 980,263 2016 CO Design Criteria Table 17 MSA 8520 1- Hour CO Monitors Tucson Design # Required Population Category Value 20152016 500,000 – 1,000,000 2.0 ppm No Specific Requirement CO Monitors # Operating 3 SLAMS monitors 2 SP monitors a 2015 Estimated >1,000,000 Requires 1 Population 1,010,025 a. Requires one, collocated with one required Near-Road NO 2 monitor, per 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.2.1 and 4.3.2. Refer to page 4 of this Plan for additional information on Near-Road Monitoring. Motor vehicles are the primary source of carbon monoxide (CO) in the Tucson area. In spite of increased vehicular traffic, CO levels have dropped considerably since the county began monitoring in 1973. The dramatic decrease can primarily be contributed to the progress made by automobile manufacturers in meeting federally mandated tailpipe emissions standards and to the state vehicle inspection / maintenance programs. Violation History No exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for CO were recorded in Tucson from 1989 through 2016. In January 1988, the eight - hour health standard of nine parts per million was exceeded once at two monitoring sites on the same day. The last exceedance of the eight - hour standard prior to 1988 occurred in December 1986 at a special purpose microscale location (Broadway / Craycroft). Pima County’s status for CO was reclassified to attainment with the implementation of a Limited Maintenance Plan on April 25, 2000 by the EPA. The Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan was developed in conjunction with Pima Association of Governments and approved by EPA to help mitigate any future violations. The plan allows for additional mobile monitoring of CO at high volume intersections, and a microscale site located at Golf Links & Kolb was established, September, 2002. 26 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan CARBON MONOXIDE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Quality Assurance for Carbon Monoxide All data quality assessment requirements as outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met in 2016. The precision of SLAMS automated analyzers is based on one-point precision QC checks with a minimum frequency of every two weeks, when each analyzer is challenged by a known concentration of a check gas. For CO the concentrations are between 1.0 and 10.0 ppm. The requirements include annual audits performed in-house for accuracy. Three levels are reported of the four audit point levels that are used for CO. The audit levels are: level two at 0.900 - 2.99 ppm, level three at 3.0 -7.99 ppm, level four at 8.0 -15.99 ppm and level five at 16.0 -30.99 ppm. All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. Table 18 Carbon Monoxide Audit Dates 2016 Craycroft & 22nd St. 5/18, 11/15 Children’s Park 3/10, 9/22, Cherry & Glenn; Seasonal 2/08, 11/15 Alvernon & 22nd St. 2/08, 8/19 Golf Links & Kolb; Seasonal 2/08, 11/15 NPAP Carbon Monoxide TTP Audit Dates 2016 Cherry Glenn 4/14 Golf Links and Kolb 4/14 Table 19 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS: 35ppm 1-Hour Average, 9ppm 8- Hour Average Year 2016 1st Max. 1- HR Avg 2nd Max. 1- HR Avg 1st Max. 2nd Max. 8- HR Avg 8- HR Avg Site Craycroft & 22nd St 1011 1.4 1.2 .7 .7 Alvernon & 22nd St. 1014 2.1 1.8 .9 .9 Cherry & Glenn 1021 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.2 Children’s Park 1028 1.0 1.0 .7 .6 Golf Links & Kolb 1031 1.3 1.1 .8 .7 27 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan NITROGEN DIOXIDE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) is currently measured at two locations in Tucson. The Environmental Protection Agency has revised the NO 2 requirements. The 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.3, design criteria document states that there are no minimum requirements for the number of NO 2 monitoring sites in Pima County. 2016 NO 2 Design Criteria Table 20 MSA 8520 Tucson Population Category Annual Design Value 1- Hour 98th Percentile Design Value # of Required NO 2 Monitors # of NO 2 Monitors 2010 Census 980,263 500,000 – 1,000,000 8.17ppb 38.9 ppb No Requirement 2 SLAMS monitors 2015 Estimated Population 1,010,025 >1,000,000 a c Population Pima County a. b. b Require 1 microscale Requires 1 area-wide 1 SLAMS areawide monitor 1 SLAMS monitor Requires one microscale near-road NO 2 monitor for populations over 1,000,000 per 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.3.2. Requires one area-wide NO 2 monitor for populations greater than 1,000,000 per 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.3.3(a). Historical Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) levels remain well below federal standards. The Craycroft and 22nd St. monitor has been operational since 1973, measuring typical neighborhood NO 2 concentrations. Much of the data has been used in studies measuring the effects of NO 2 as a precursor to ozone formation. A NO 2 analyzer was operating at the Pomona site from 1988 until 1996, when the site was closed. The site was re-established at the Children’s Park location in May, 1998, one mile east of the original Pomona Site, and allows for continued monitoring on the north side of Tucson and in the lower valley area. A NO 2 analyzer was operating at the Downtown site until early 1989. From 1995 to December 2001, NO 2 monitoring was conducted at Saguaro National Park East to establish baseline conditions in a Class I Wilderness Area. 28 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan NITROGEN DIOXIDE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Quality Assurance for NO 2 All data quality assessment requirements outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met for 2016. The requirements include precision QC checks with a minimum frequency of every other week with a check gas range between 0.01 and 0.10 ppm and annual internal audits for accuracy with three point check levels between 0.008 - 0.019 ppm, 0.02 - 0.049 ppm, 0.05 - 0.099 ppm and 0.10 - 0.299 ppm . All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. The 2016 precision and accuracy tests will be reported in ppb. Table 21 Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Dates 2016 Craycroft & 22nd St. 5/13, 11/15 Children’s Park 3/11, 9/22 Nitrogen Dioxide TTP Audit Dates 2016 None Table 22 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS: 100 ppb 1- Hour Average (98th percentile of the 1-hour concentrations averaged over three years); 53 ppb Annual Average 1st Max. 1- Hour Avg 1 - Hour 98th Percentile Annual Mean Site Craycroft & 22nd St 1011 37.7 33.5 8.17 Children’s Park 1028 45.7 32.8 7.62 Year 2016 29 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan REACTIVE OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NO Y ) MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Reactive Oxides of Nitrogen are currently monitored at one location in Pima County fulfilling the NCore site requirement. Quality Assurance for NO y All data quality assessment requirements outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met for 2016. The requirements include precision QC checks with a minimum frequency of every other week with a check gas range between 0.01 and 0.10 ppm and annual internal audits for accuracy with three point check levels between 0.008 - 0.019 ppm, 0.02 – 0.049 ppm and 0.05 – 0.099 ppm . All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. The 2016 precision and accuracy tests will be reported in ppb. Table 23 Reactive Oxides of Nitrogen Audit Dates 2016 Children’s Park NCore 3/11, 9/23 Reactive Oxides of Nitrogen TTP Audit Dates 2016 None NPAP Audit Dates 2016 None Table 24 Annual summary statistics: reported in ppb 1st Max. Annual Year 1- Hour Mean 2016 Site Avg Children’s Park 1028 102.0 9.69 30 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan SULFUR DIOXIDE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) is currently monitored at one location in Pima County. On October 1, 2010, an SO 2 trace monitor was added at the Children’s Park NCore location as required for an NCore site. The SO 2 monitor at the 22nd and Craycroft site was discontinued on December 31, 2010. The Environmental Protection Agency has revised the SO 2 requirements. The design criteria indicated in 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.4, states that there are no minimum requirements for the number of SO 2 monitoring sites. 2016 SO 2 Design Criteria Table 25 Population Pima County MSA 8520 Tucson Population Category Total SO 2 [tons/year] Based on 2011 N EI Population Weighted Emissions Index [million Data Requirements Rule Sources using Monitoring 1Hour Design Value # of Required SO 2 Monitors # of SO 2 Monitors 4.0 ppb No Requirement 1 NCore SLAMS persons- tons per year] 2010 Census 980,263 500,000 – 1,000,000 2015 Estimated Population 1,010,025 >1,000,000 2,184.9 2194.8 No Requirement Historical Sulfur Dioxide Monitoring Ambient concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) in Tucson have historically remained well below all federal standards, and in recent years have been extremely low. With new trace SO 2 monitoring we can now get more accurate readings at very low levels. There are no major stationary sources of SO 2 in the Tucson air planning area. Quality Assurance for SO 2 All data quality assessment requirements outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met for 2016. The requirements include precision checks every other week with a check gas range between 0.01 and 0.10 ppm and annual internal audits for accuracy with three point check levels between 0.0003 - 0.0029 ppm, 0.0030 – 0.0049 ppm and 0.005 – 0.0079 ppm . All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. 31 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Table 26 Sulfur Dioxide Audit Dates 2016 Children’s Park NCore 3/22, 9/22 Sulfur Dioxide TTP Audit Dates 2016 None Table 27 Annual summary statistics: Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS: 75 ppb 1- Hour Average (99th percentile of the 1hour daily maximum concentrations, averaged over 3 years) Year 2016 Site Children’s Park NCore 1028 1st Max. 1- Hour Avg 1–Hour 99th Percentile Annual Mean 3.2 1.3 0.08 32 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan LEAD MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS Lead monitoring was performed in Pima County at the Children’s Park NCore location until May, when it was discontinued. This was a non-source-oriented monitor. The sampling schedule for lead was based on the 2016 EPA’s monitoring sampling schedule with a one in six day schedule for the primary monitor and a one in twelve day schedule for the collocated lead monitor. The design criteria indicated in 40 CFR Part 58, app. D, 4.5, states that there is one required lead monitor. 2016 Lead Design Criteria Table 28 NCore Site Children’s Park 040191028 MSA 8520 Tucson Population Category Population Pima County Lead Design Value # Required monitors # of Pb Monitors 500,000 – 1,000,000 2010 Census 980,263 0.00 ** 1 1- NCore 1- Collocated >1,000,000 2015 Estimated Population 1,010,025 1 Same as above ** Lead monitoring discontinued May, 2016, per approval by EPA. See attachment A. Historical Lead Monitoring Lead concentrations are extremely low in Tucson. Lead monitoring began in Pima County in 1975 at eight TSP sampling locations. In August, 1978, lead analyses were discontinued at all but two sites. Magnetic Observatory (University of Arizona) and Prince Road were selected to represent a neighborhood site and roadway site, respectively. Lead sampling was started at a third site (Broadway & Swan) in January 1983. Lead analysis at Magnetic Observatory was discontinued in 1983 due to lack of detectable levels of lead. A TSP sampler was installed at South Tucson in 1991 for purposes of lead analysis. This site, along with the other two remaining sites, (Prince Road and Broadway & Swan) adequately fulfilled the siting criteria for measuring potential highest urban concentrations of lead in the particulate monitoring network. In March of 1992 the Broadway & Swan lead analysis was discontinued and the TSP samplers from the South Tucson and the Magnetic Observatory sites were moved to the 22nd & Craycroft site. 22nd & Craycroft and Prince Road sites remained until March of 1997, when lead monitoring was discontinued due to non- detectable concentrations. 33 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan On October 15, 2008 EPA strengthened the lead standardThe primary standard of 1.5 ug/m3 was lowered to 0.15ug/m3, measured as total suspended particles (TSP).The secondary standard is identical to the primary standard. According to the 2005 National Air Emissions Inventory (NEI) from EPA, Pima County had no sources of lead of one ton or more. That meant that Pima County was required to perform area monitoring only, which was done at the Children’s Park NCore location. Monitoring and reporting began on February 27, 2012, and was discontinued May 2016 per approval by EPA. See attachment A. Quality Assurance for Lead All data quality assessment requirements outlined in 40 CFR Part 58, app. A, have been met for 2016. The requirements include quarterly flow rate verification and audits. All valid precision and accuracy tests are reported to the Air Quality System (AQS) database on a quarterly basis. Protocol Flow rate verification Flow Rate Audit NPAP Audit Instrument Tisch Hi Vol with Brushless Motor Table 29 Frequency Date Completed 2016 Quarterly 2/9, 3/9, 4/7, 4/22 Collocated: 2/9, 3/9, 4/7 Semi3/15, 5/20, Annually Collocated: 03/15, 5/20 none Table 30 Annual summary statistics: NAAQS Lead: 0.15 µg/m3 three month average Annual Mean 1st Max. 2nd Max. Year 24- HR Avg 24- Hour 2016 Avg Site Children’s Park 1028 .011 .006 .004 34 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan V. DETAILED SITE AND MONITOR INFORMATION CHILDREN’S PARK NCore: AQS # 040191028 Site Name AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description Site Description CHILDREN’S PARK NCore 040191028 400 W. River Road, Tucson, AZ 32.295150 / -110.982300 2286 Gravel in walled compound, dirt parking lot, dry river bed This site is located at the confluence of the Rillito River and Pima Wash, a natural low spot in the local topography. Single - family residences and a popular county park with exercise trails extend to the north, northwest, and west, respectively. Heavy commercial usage dominates to the south and east, including large shopping malls and automobile dealerships. 35 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Monitoring Information CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of Purpose Site Type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA PM 2.5 - Not a Primary Monitor 170 1 88101 / 3 NAAQS Comparison / Population Exposure Population Exposure Met One / BAM 1020 FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS NCore Neighborhood 360 0 0 Continuous 4.3 meters 360 1.73 meters n/a n/a 14.3 meters n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 YES YES Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Continuous PM 2.5 sampling began at this neighborhood scale site on January 23, 2011. 36 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code/ POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of Purpose Site Type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height PM 2.5 Primary 118 1 88101 /1 NAAQS Comparison / Population Exposure Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Population Exposure R & P/ Partisol-Plus 2025 FRM PDEQ / PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS NCore Neighborhood 115 0 0 Every three days 3.1 meters above the ground on a platform located in a city water well site. 290, from 280 to 210, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 2.08 meters n/a n/a 8.0 meters n/a 1.2 meters /Every twelve days (after April 27, 2013 every six days) / R& P 2025 Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Sampling began in 1999. 37 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code/ POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of Purpose PM 2.5 Collocated 118 1 88101 / POC 2 Site Type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Population Exposure R & P / Partisol-Plus 2025 FRM PDEQ / PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS NCore Neighborhood 54 0 Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS; 0 Every twelve days; after April 27, 2013 every six days 3.1 meters above the ground on a platform located in a city water well site. 270, from 290 to 200, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 2.08 meters n/a n/a 8.0 meters n/a 1.2 meters /Every twelve days (after April 27, 2013 every six days) / R& P 2025 Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This is the collocated monitor for Children’s Park NCore PM 2.5 . 38 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of Purpose Site Type Instrument Manufacturer / Model Quarterly flow rate Audit dates FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height PM Coarse PM 10 -PM 2.5 (Other) 176 2 86101/ 1 Research support / NCore requirement Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor /ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Population exposure R & P / Partisol-Plus 2025 Sampler Pair 03/15, 06/27, 09/16, 12/16 FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS NCore Neighborhood 107 0 0 Every three days 3.1 meters above the ground on a platform located in a city water well site. 290, from 280 to 210, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 2.08 meters n/a n/a 8.0 meters n/a 1.2 m / 1 in 3 days / n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: The subtraction method for determining the coarse PM fraction was initiated in 2011, using a matched pair of Partisol- Plus samplers. 39 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height PM 2.5 SPECIATION Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 810 1 Speciated parameters/ 5 Research support for the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Population Exposure Met One/ Super SASS Other Pima County Department of Environmental Quality/ RTP UCD SLAMS CSN Supplemental ; NCore Neighborhood 118 0 0 Every three days 3 meters above the ground on a platform located in a city water well site. 290, from 290 to 200, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 1.83 meters n/a n/a SASS 5.2 meters n/a Collocation is fulfilled by the National NCore network. Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Sampling began for PM 2.5 Speciation in 2000. 40 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of houly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height CARBON MONOXIDE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 554 1 42101/ 1 NAAQS comparison / NCore requirement Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 48i -TLE FRM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose Monitor / SLAMS January, 2017 NCore Neighborhood 8765 0 0 Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter in a city water well site FEP Teflon/ 11.84 seconds 360 1.70 meters n/a n/a 14.0 meters n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site began monitoring for Carbon Monoxide in October, 1998. 41 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height OZONE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ schedule/collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 047 1 44201/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Maintenance of long term ozone monitoring at this location Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a SLAMS NCore Neighborhood 365 0 One in 1999; One in 2002; One in 2014 Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter located in a city water well site. FEP Teflon / 5.9 seconds 360 1.73 meters n/a n/a 16.4 meters n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site began August of 1997 and is a relocation (1.5 kilometers, northeast) of the Pomona site. This site is representative of a neighborhood scale in the north central region of the air planning area where ozone levels are generally expected to be high due to the low altitude and the prevailing southeasterly winds. 42 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height NITROGEN DIOXIDE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ schedule/collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 074 1 42602/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Maintenance of long term monitoring at this location Highest Concentration Ecotech / 9841 T FRM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Proposed NCore Neighborhood / Area Wide Monitoring 8638 0 0 Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter located in a city water well site FEP Teflon / 9.19 seconds 360 1.70 meters n/a n/a 12.8 meters n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: The site began monitoring for Nitrogen Dioxide in May, 1998, and is a relocation (1.5 kilometers, northeast) of the Pomona site. 43 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / season Probe height REACTIVE OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NO Y ) Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ schedule/collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 674 1 42600/ 1 Research support / Comply with NCore requirements Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 42i - Y n/a PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS NCore neighborhood 8239 0 0 Continuous 10.0 meters above the ground on a shelter located in a city water well site FEP Teflon / 0.6 seconds to converter; 6.1 seconds from converter to analyzer. 360 0.36 meters probe to mast; 7.31 meters probe to shelter n/a n/a 12.8 meters, horizontal, inlet well above tree tops n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: The site began monitoring for reactive oxides of nitrogen in October, 2010 for the NCore site requirements, using a Thermo 42i-y instrument with remote converter mounted at the requisite 10 meters. 44 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 1-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height SULFUR DIOXIDE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 560 1 42401/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Comply with NCore requirements Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 43i - TLE FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS NCore neighborhood 8693 0 0 Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter located in a city water well site FEP Teflon / 12.1 seconds 360 1.70 meters n/a n/a 14.0 meters n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Sulfur Dioxide sampling began October 1, 2010 to conform to NCore site requirements. 45 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective/ Statement of Purpose Site Type LEAD Primary Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Analytical Instrument / Method Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of rolling three month average standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 110 ICAP spectra (ICP-MS) 2 14129/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Comply with NCore requirements Population Exposure Non- Source -Oriented Tisch / Hi –Vol Plus n/a PDEQ/ PDEQ Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (CRAO) ICAP Spectra (ICP-MS) / EQL-0510-191 SLAMS Proposed NCore Neighborhood 23 0 0 Every six days 2.0 meters 300, from 270 to 210, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) n/a n/a n/a 8.4 meters n/a 2.3 m / 6 days/ Tisch Hi –Vol Plus Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Lead sampling began February 27, 2012. Lead sampling discontinued May, 2016. 46 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method Code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective/ Statement of Purpose LEAD QA Collocated Site Type Population Exposure Non- Source -Oriented Tisch Hi –Vol Plus n/a PDEQ/ PDEQ Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (CRAO) ICAP Spectra (ICP-MS) / EQL -0510-191 SLAMS Proposed NCore Neighborhood 24 0 Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical Lab Analytical Instrument / Method Monitor type Monitor Network Affiliation Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of rolling three month average standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 110 ICAP spectra (ICP-MS) 2 14129 (POC 2 as of March, 2014) To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS 0 Every twelve days; Every six days starting March 7, 2015 2.0 m 290, from 270 to 200, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) n/a n/a n/a 6.6 meters n/a 2.3 m / 12 days/ Tisch Hi –Vol Plus Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Lead sampling began February 27, 2012. Lead sampling discontinued May, 2016. 47 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name CHILDREN’S PARK NCore Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model METEOROLOGICAL DATA 061, 040, 011 4 61103, 61104, 62101, 62201 Research support / Source determination for criteria pollutants FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA n/a WD/WS –MET ONE 50.5; Temp/RH – VAISALA HMP45AC n/a PDEQ, PDEQ n/a n/a n/a 361 n/a n/a continuous WD/WS – 10m ; Temp/RH – 4.25m 360 n/a n/a n/a WD/WS – 16.5m ; Temp/RH – 12.8m n/a n/a Arizona State Route 77 runs north - south 0.5 kilometers to the east, providing six lanes of heavily used arterial routing with a 2012 ADT of 44,000. River Road runs east – west 0.5 kilometers to the north, with a 2013 ADT of 37,168 YES Tucson, AZ 8520 48 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan GREEN VALLEY: AQS # 040191030 Site Description Site Name GREEN VALLEY AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191030 601 N. La Canada Drive, Green Valley, AZ 31.87952 / -110.996440 2910 Dirt, sparse desert vegetation This site is situated in a residential / commercial area. Open pit copper mines and tailings ponds are located four kilometers to the west of the community. 49 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of houly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT GREEN VALLEY PM 10 122 1 81102/1 NAAQS comparison / Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner Population Exposure Met One/ BAM 1020 FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose/ SLAMS Neighborhood 8434 0 April 9, 2013; July 25, 2014. Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter near the Pima County Government Center. 360 1.63 meters n/a n/a 12.5 meters n/a n/a 100 meters west of La Canada with a 2015 ADT of 14,332 Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E 0.5 kilometers west of Interstate 19 with a 2011 ADT of 31,000 Yes CBSA MSA Green Valley, AZ 46060 Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is fifty kilometers south of Downtown Tucson in the retirement community of Green Valley. PM 10 monitoring commenced in September 1989 at the established TSP site there. ASARCO and Freeport-McMoRan operate several open pit mines and tailings ponds just west of the community. The monitoring objective is to monitor the population exposure to this potentially significant source of airborne particulates. The monitor was relocated in February 2001, approximately 1 kilometer north of the original Esperanza site, to the Pima County Government Center at 601 N. La Canada Drive. The new site is considered a continuation of the original site. PM 10 levels were below the health standards in the years 1989 through 2012. In 2013, there was one exceedance resulting from an intense regional dust storm that may be considered as an Exceptional Event, dependent on approval from EPA. 50 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT GREEN VALLEY PM 2.5 733 1 88501/3 Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner / Population Exposure Population Exposure Met-One / BAM 1020 other PDEQ / PDEQ n/a OTHER Neighborhood 8238 0 0 Continuous 4.25 meters above the ground on a shelter near the Pima County Government Center. 360 2.03 meters n/a n/a 10.7 meters n/a n/a 100 meters west of La Canada with a 2015 ADT of 14,332 0.5 kilometers west of Interstate 19 with a 2011 ADT of 31,000 Annual n/a Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E Yes CBSA MSA Green Valley, AZ 46060 Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is fifty kilometers south of Downtown Tucson in the retirement community of Green Valley. This monitor was initially installed in May of 2000 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. Pima County began reporting the PM 2.5 data to EPA July, 2003. 51 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT GREEN VALLEY OZONE 047 1 44201/1 NAAQS comparison / Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 361 0 0 Continuous 3.3 meters above the ground on a shelter near the Pima County Government Center. FEP Teflon / 7.95 seconds 360 1.4 meters n/a n/a 8.5 meters n/a n/a 100 meters west of La Canada with a 2015 ADT of 14,332 Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E 0.5 kilometers west of Interstate 19 with a 2011 ADT of 31,000 Yes CBSA MSA Green Valley, AZ 46060 Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is fifty kilometers south of Downtown Tucson in the retirement community of Green Valley. This site was initially established in April of 2002 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. Pima County began reporting the ozone data to EPA July, 2003. 52 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan CORONA de TUCSON: AQS # 040190008 Site Description Site Name CORONA de TUCSON AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040190008 22001 S. Houghton Road, Tucson, AZ 32.00474 / -110.79260 3078 Gravel within enclosure; dirt, sparse desert vegetation surrounding This site is situated in an undisturbed natural desert area. 53 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name CORONA de TUCSON Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer/Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA PM 10 126 1 81102/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Upwind Background Upwind Background R&P 2000 FRM PDEQ / PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Regional 58 0 0 Every six days 2.08 meters 360 n/a n/a n/a 23.4 meters n/a n/a 1.6 kilometers west of Houghton Road with a 2015 ADT of 11,752 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is the only regional scale monitor in the network. PM 10 sampling was started here in September 1988, in conjunction with existing total suspended particulates (TSP) sampling. This site exhibits the lowest network concentrations. TSP sampling was discontinued in May 1989. Hi - Vol sampling for PM 10 was substituted with dichotomous sampling during the last quarter of 1989 in support of the state sponsored Tucson PM 10 Source Apportionment Study. Hi - Vol PM 10 sampling resumed in January 1990. Low -Vol PM 10 R& P 2000 sampling began in March, 2006. 54 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan ORANGE GROVE: AQS # 040190011 Site Description Site Name ORANGE GROVE AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040190011 3401 W. Orange Grove Road, Tucson, AZ 32.32255 / -111.037700 2234 Gravel in fenced compound, dirt road shoulders This site is situated in a residential area with light commerce and industry. There is an asphalt batch plant and redi-mix concrete operations with a large gravel pit less than three kilometers to the west of the site in the Santa Cruz River bed area. 55 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name ORANGE GROVE Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer/Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances PM 10 Primary 127 2 81102/ 2 NAAQS Comparison / Highest Concentration Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Every day Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Highest Concentration R&P 2025 Sequential FRM PDEQ /PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Neighborhood 337 0 Exceedances of the 24 – hour standard: two in 1988, four in 1999, one in 2002, one in 2003, one in 2009 ; one in 2014 2.2 meters above the ground in a city water well site 360 n/a n/a n/a 19.2 meters n/a 1.2 meters /Every day; reported every 6th day/ R& P 2025 Sequential 37 meters west of Camino de la Tierra with a 2011 ADT of 7,894 and 70 meters south of Orange Grove Road with a 2015 ADT of 26,928 2 kilometers east of Interstate 10 with a 2012 ADT of 110,000 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Established in February 1985, this site is the oldest of the PM 10 monitoring sites in the network. Orange Grove was chosen as the initial PM 10 monitoring site and the design value site for Group II in the Tucson air planning area based on historically high TSP data. This neighborhood scale site is located near the confluence of the Santa Cruz, Rillito, and Canada del Oro Rivers in the Tucson Valley. This site is situated near the freeway and railway tracks, therefore high PM 10 values are expected here. Dichotomous sampling was started at this site in July of 1993. The dichotomous ran in co-location with a HI-VOL- SA/1200 model from 1993 to 1996. The site was converted to dichotomous only operations on October 1, 1996 continuing until December 1998. Hi-Vol sampling resumed in January 1999, but was replaced with co-located low volume sequential samplers in 2004. 56 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name ORANGE GROVE Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose PM 10 Collocated 127 2 81102 / 4 Site type Instrument Manufacturer/Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Highest Concentration R&P 2025 Sequential FRM PDEQ /PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Neighborhood 322 0 Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS One in 2002; One in 2009; One in 2014 Every six days 2.2 meters above the ground in a city water well site 360 n/a n/a n/a 19.2 meters n/a 1.2 meters /Every day ; reported every 6th day/ R& P 2025 Sequential 37 meters west of Camino de la Tierra with a 2011 ADT of 7,894 and 70 meters south of Orange Grove Road with a 2015 ADT of 26,928 2 kilometers east of Interstate 10 with a 2012 ADT of 110,000 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 57 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT ORANGE GROVE PM 2.5 118 1 88101/ 1 NAAQS Comparison / Highest expected concentration Population Exposure R&P Partisol-Plus 2025 FRM PDEQ / PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Neighborhood 110 0 0 Every three days 2.1 meters above the ground in a city water well site 360 n/a n/a n/a 20.3 meters n/a n/a 37 meters west of Camino de la Tierra with a 2011 ADT of 7,894 and 70 meters south of Orange Grove Road with a 2015 ADT of 26,928 2 kilometers east of Interstate 10 with a 2012 ADT of 110,000 Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual Yes NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E Yes MSA Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: PM 2.5 sampling began at this neighborhood scale site in January, 1999. It is located near the confluence of the Santa Cruz, Rillito and Canada del Oro Rivers in the Tucson Valley, toward the northwest end of the air planning area. The site is situated near a freeway and railroad tracks. 58 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan SOUTH TUCSON: AQS # 040191001 Site Description Site Name SOUTH TUCSON AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape 040191001 1601 S. 6th Avenue, South Tucson, AZ 32.20195 / -110.967900 2420 Primarily paved parking lots; gravel and desert landscaping surrounding building. This site is situated in a dense residential / commercial area. There are numerous unpaved alleys and lots in the vicinity. Location description Comments: From January 1985 to September 1988 this site approached or exceeded TSP standards. PM 10 sampling began here in September 1988. On March 8, 1993, the samplers were relocated from the original site to the new South Tucson Governmental Complex, which is less than two blocks north and across S. 6th Avenue. Levels at this location are representative of area - wide emissions patterns with high population exposure. The annual means for 1989 through 1999 were below the health standard. The 24 hour NAAQS was exceeded twice in 1999 and 2002. Two co-located PM 10 samplers were operational at this site from June 1991 to June 1999. Co-location of the PM 10 samplers was discontinued when a third sampler was added and every day sampling began on June 23, 1999. In March, 2004, the Hi -Vol samplers were replaced with co-located Low –Vol sequential samplers. 59 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA SOUTH TUCSON PM 10 Primary 127 2 81102 /1 NAAQS Comparison / Population Exposure Population Exposure R&P 2025 Sequential FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Neighborhood 331 0 Exceedances of the 24 – hour standard: two in 1999; two in 2002; one in 2009; two in 2013 Every day 6.9 meters above the ground on the roof of the South Tucson Governmental Complex Building. 360 2.2 meters n/a n/a 13.2 meters n/a 1.7 meters/ Every day; reported every 6th day/ R&P 2025 Sequential 41 meters east of South 6th Avenue with a 2015 ADT of 17,612 528 meters south of 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 28,374 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 60 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA SOUTH TUCSON PM 10 Collocated 127 2 81102 / 2 To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS Population Exposure R&P 2025 Sequential FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Neighborhood 336 0 One in 1999; one in 2013; one in 2014 Every six days 6.9 meters above the ground on the roof of the South Tucson Governmental Complex Building. 360 2.2 meters n/a n/a 15.4 meters n/a 1.7 meters/ Every day; reported every 6th day/ R&P 2025 Sequential 41 meters east of South 6th Avenue with a 2015 ADT of 17,612 528 meters south of 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 28,374 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 61 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan SANTA CLARA SCHOOL: AQS# 040191026 Site Description Site Name SANTA CLARA SCHOOL AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191026 6910 S. Santa Clara Avenue, Tucson, AZ 32.125950 / -110.982600 2540 Large flat roof, paved parking lots and streets, grass playground. This site is situated in a Southwest Tucson residential district. Comments: This site is located south of Interstate 10 and east of Interstate 19 and provides a representative neighborhood scale site on Tucson’s south side. Being near the fringe of the city limits, this site should track transport values that develop with a southerly wind from a combination of desert, agricultural land, and silt flood plain that is found on the Tohono O’Odham Indian Reservation (San Xavier district) 500 meters south of the site. The Hi- Vol sampler was replaced in April, 2006, with a Low- Vol sampler. A co – located monitor was added February, 2016. 62 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA SANTA CLARA SCHOOL PM 10 126 1 81102 /1 NAAQS Comparison / Population Exposure Population Exposure R&P 2000 FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 59 0 Exceedances of the 24 – hour standard: One on 10/27/2008 Every six days 6.45 meters above the ground on the roof of the Santa Clara Elementary School. 360 2.01 meters (to roof) n/a n/a 23.9 meters n/a 1.7 meters 450 meters east of Interstate 19 with a 2012 ADT of 38,000 800 meters south of Valencia Road with a 2014 ADT of 46,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 63 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA SANTA CLARA SCHOOL PM 10 Collocated 126 1 81102 /2 To comply with ambient air quality protocols and standards in order for data to be used for comparison to the NAAQS Population Exposure R&P 2000 FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 30 0 Exceedances of the 24 – hour standard: One on 10/27/2008 Every six days 6.45 meters above the ground on the roof of the Santa Clara Elementary School. 360 2.01 meters (to roof) n/a n/a 23.9 meters n/a 1.7 meters 450 meters east of Interstate 19 with a 2012 ADT of 38,000 800 meters south of Valencia Road with a 2014 ADT of 46,168 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 64 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan TANGERINE: AQS # 040191018 Previous Current Site Description Site Name TANGERINE AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape 040191018 12101 N. Camino de Oeste, Tucson, AZ 32.425250 / -111.063500 2638 Dirt, sparse desert vegetation to the east; high density, tri-level and multi-unit apartments directly west of station. This site has been situated in a relatively undisturbed natural desert area for most of its existence, but residential development in recent years have been built to within 35 meters to the west, and low density residential developments are encroaching from the south, east and north to within 3 kilometers to 5 kilometers. Location description 65 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors / schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA TANGERINE PM 10 126 1 81102/ 1 NAAQS Comparison / General Background * General Background R&P 2000 FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ PDEQ SLAMS Urban 59 0 0 Every six days 4.5 meters above the ground on a shelter on Tucson’s far northwest side 360 2.01 meters (to roof) n/a n/a 6.4 meters n/a n/a Tangerine Road runs approximately east – west 70 meters south of the site with a 2016 ADT of 14,824 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 * See comment on page 3, PDEQ’s anticipated modifications to network in 2017 Comments: The primary objective of this site is to assess background concentrations and to assess transport impact from outlying sources during exceptional wind events. As part of the urban haze/ visibility study, dichotomous samplers were installed at this site in July 1993. PM 10 data from these samplers was used to supplement the existing PM 10 network from October 1996 to December 1998, when the dichotomous samplers were relocated and a Hi-Vol sampler was installed to continue PM 10 monitoring. In 2005, the Hi-Vol PM 10 sampler was replaced with a Low –Vol R& P 2000 sampler. 66 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA TANGERINE OZONE 047/ 087 1 44201 / 1 NAAQS comparison / Highest Concentration * Highest Concentration Thermo Scientific / 49c and 49i FEM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Urban 362 0 One in 2002; One in 2009; One in 2014 Continuous 3.75 meters above the ground on a shelter on Tucson’s far northwest side. FEP Teflon / 8.5 seconds 360 1.24 meters n/a n/a 8.3 meters n/a n/a Tangerine Road runs approximately east – west 70 meters south of the site with a 2016 ADT of 14,824 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Tangerine was established in November 1989. Ozone concentrations at this site have been the highest in the network on occasion. This may be due to the prevailing southeasterly winds transporting ozone from the urban area. Concentrations remain high well into the night and early morning. 67 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan GERONIMO: AQS # 040191113 Site Description Site Name GERONIMO AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191113 2498 N. Geronimo Tucson, AZ 32.251840 / -110.965300 2398 Dirt, dead shrubs, unpaved road shoulders This site is situated in a residential area in a City of Tucson water well site. 68 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA GERONIMO PM 10 122 1 81102 / 1 NAAQS Comparison / Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner Population Exposure Met One / BAM 1020 FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 8681 0 One on 7/22/2009; one on 04/09/2013; one on 07/25/2014 Continuous 4.6m 360 1.83 meters n/a n/a 9.3 meters n/a n/a 154.8 meters north of Grant Road with a 2016 ADT 33,210 617.6 meters east of Stone Avenue with a 2012 ADT 21,000 397.5 meters west of North 1st Avenue with a 2015 ADT 37,033 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This monitor was initially installed in July 1, 2007 for Air Quality Index reporting using a continuous monitor. This is a Special Purpose site situated in a residential area, monitoring for population exposure. There was one exceedance on April 9, 2013 that may be considered as an Exceptional Event dependent on the approval from EPA. 69 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT GERONIMO PM 2.5 733 1 88501 /3 Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner / Population Exposure Population Exposure Met One / BAM 1020 Other PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a Other Neighborhood 8477 0 0 Continuous 4.6 meters 360 1.98 meters n/a n/a 9.4 meters n/a n/a 154.8 meters north of Grant Road with a 2016 ADT 33,210 617.6 meters east of Stone Avenue with a 2012 ADT 21,000 397.5 meters west of North 1st Avenue with a 2015 ADT 37,033 Annual n/a Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This monitor was initially installed in July of 2001 for Air Quality Index reporting using a continuous monitor. Pima County began reporting the PM 2.5 data to EPA July, 2003. This is site situated in a residential area, monitoring for population exposure. 70 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan ROSE ELEMENTARY: AQS # 040191032 Site Description Site Name ROSE ELEMENTARY AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191032 710 W. Michigan, Tucson, AZ 32.173 / -110.980115 2438 Grass playground The site is located in a residential neighborhood with light commercial enterprises. The Santa Cruz River, with several sand and gravel operations, parallels the interstate one kilometer to the west. 71 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA ROSE ELEMENTARY PM 2.5 733 1 88501 /3 Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner / Population Exposure Population Exposure Met One / BAM 1020 Other PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Other Neighborhood 8258 0 0 Continuous 4.9 meters above the ground on the roof of a shelter located on the grounds of Rose Elementary School 360 2.39 meters n/a n/a 11.8 meters n/a n/a 12th Avenue 235 meters to the east with a 2011 ADT of 22,000 Ajo Way 528 meters to the north with a 2015 ADT of 23, 797 Interstate 19 runs north-south half a kilometer to the west with a 2012 ADT 80,000 n/a Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This monitor was initially installed in October of 2000 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. This area was identified as having higher than normal number of pediatric asthma cases. Pima County began reporting the PM 2.5 data to EPA July, 2003. 72 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name ROSE ELEMENTARY Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height OZONE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 047 1 44201/ 1 NAAQS comparison / Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ/PDEQ n/a Special Purpose/ SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 366 0 0 Continuous 4.1 meters above the ground on the roof of a shelter located on the grounds of Rose Elementary School. FEP Teflon / 9.5 seconds 360 1.63 meters n/a n/a 11.4 meters n/a n/a 12th Avenue 235 meters to the east with a 2011 ADT of 22,000 Ajo Way 528 meters to the north with a 2015 ADT of 23, 797 Interstate 19 runs north-south half a kilometer to the west with a 2012 ADT 80,000 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site was initially established in October of 2000 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. This area was identified as having higher than normal number of pediatric asthma cases. Pima County began reporting the ozone data to EPA July, 2003. 73 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan COACHLINE: AQS # 040191034 Site Description Site Name COACHLINE AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191034 9597 N. Coachline, Tucson, AZ 32.380820 / -111.127160 2104 Dirt within walled compound, residential neighborhood The site is situated in a residential neighborhood. The normally dry Santa Cruz River runs northwest between the Interstate and the neighborhood and contributes to airborne dust through previous deposition of fine clay soils throughout the floodplain. This area has previously been used for farming and ranching, and sand and gravel operations are still in operation five to ten kilometers upstream to the southwest. 74 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of 24-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT COACHLINE PM 2.5 733 1 88501/ 3 Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner / Population Exposure Population Exposure Met One / BAM 1020 Other PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Other Neighborhood 8027 0 0 Continuous 4.9 meters above the ground on a shelter on Tucson’s far northwest side 280, from 250 to 170, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 2.39 meters n/a 9.41 meters 5.0 meters n/a n/a approximately 1.25 kilometers west of Interstate 10 with a 2012 ADT of 77,000 .5 kilometer north of Twin Peaks Road 2015 ADT of 5,992 Suitable for comparison to PM 2.5 Annual n/a NAAQS Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E Yes MSA Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This monitor was initially installed in March of 2001 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. This area was identified as having higher than normal number of pediatric asthma cases. Pima County began reporting the PM 2.5 data to EPA July, 2003. 75 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer/Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA COACHLINE OZONE 047 1 44201 / 1 NAAQS comparison / Provide air pollution data to the public in a timely manner Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Neighborhood 365 0 0 Continuous 3.4 meters above the ground on a shelter on Tucson’s far northwest side FEP Teflon / 9.3 seconds 310, from 230 to 180, includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE) 1.3 meters n/a n/a 5.3 meters n/a n/a approximately 1.25 kilometers west of Interstate 10 with a 2012 ADT of 77,000 .5 kilometer north of Twin Peaks Road 2015 ADT of 5,992 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site was initially established in April of 2001 as part of the Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program. This area was identified as having higher than normal number of pediatric asthma cases. Pima County began reporting the ozone data to EPA July, 2003. 76 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 22ND STREET & CRAYCROFT: AQS # 040191011 Site Description Site Name 22ND AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191011/ 1 1237 S. Beverly Avenue, Tucson, AZ 32.204420 / -110.878067 2582 Dirt, ephemeral weeds This site is situated in a predominately residential eastside area with commercial activity lining nearby arterial routes. There is a large covered water reservoir north of the location. STREET & CRAYCROFT 77 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 22ND STREET & CRAYCROFT CARBON MONOXIDE 158/ 054 1 42101 /1 NAAQS comparison / Population Exposure Population Exposure Horiba / APMA370 ; TECO / 48i-TLE FRM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS Neighborhood 8757 0 0 Continuous 4.4 meters above the ground on the roof of a shelter located in a city water well site. FEP Teflon / 5.3 seconds 360 1.3 meters n/a n/a 22.0 meters n/a n/a 260 meters west is Craycroft Road with a 2015 ADT of 25,760 260 meters north is 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 43,289 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is one of the oldest in the monitoring network, originally established in 1973, and has operated continuously to the present. 78 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 22ND STREET & CRAYCROFT OZONE 047 1 44201 /1 NAAQS comparison / Maintenance of long term monitoring at this location Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS Neighborhood 365 0 One in 1997, 1999, 2002, 2011 Continuous 4.4 meters above the ground on the roof of a shelter located in a city water well site. FEP Teflon / 8.1 seconds 360 1.3 meters n/a n/a 22.0 meters n/a n/a 260 meters west is Craycroft Road with a 2015 ADT of 25,760 260 meters north is 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 43,289 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is one of the oldest in the monitoring network, originally established in 1973, and operated continuously to the present. 79 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 22ND STREET & CRAYCROFT NITROGEN DIOXIDE 157/ 074 1 42602 /1 NAAQS comparison / Maintenance of long term monitoring at this location Population Exposure Horiba / APNA -370 and Thermo Scientific / 42i FRM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS Neighborhood / Area Wide Monitoring 8462 0 0 Continuous 4.4 meters above the ground on the roof of a shelter located in a city water well site FEP Teflon / 7.5 seconds 360 1.3 meters n/a n/a 22.0 meters n/a n/a 260 meters west is Craycroft Road with a 2015 ADT of 25,760 260 meters north is 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 43,289 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: This site is one of the oldest in the monitoring network, originally established in 1973, and operated continuously to the present. 80 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 22ND STREET & ALVERNON: AQS # 040191014 Site Description Site Name 22ND AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191014 3895 E. 22nd Street, Tucson, AZ 32.207390 / -110.910650 2516 Gravel in walled compound, paved streets and sidewalks This site is situated in a commercial area near a high traffic count intersection. A large regional park is located to the northwest of the site. STREET & ALVERNON 81 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type 22ND STREET & ALVERNON CARBON MONOXIDE 174 1 42101 / 1 NAAQS comparison / Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Ecotech / Serinus 30 and Thermo Scientific 48i – TLE FRM PDEQ / PDEQ n/a SLAMS Microscale 8739 0 Years: 1975 - 1986 and 1988 Continuous 3.8 meters above the ground attached to a wall near 22nd Street at a Tucson Water well site FEP Teflon / 24.4 seconds 320 , from 5 to 325 includes predominant wind direction from 135 (SE; directly from intersection of 22nd St. and Alvernon Way). 1.15 meters n/a 2.0 meters 10.7 meters n/a n/a Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT 60 meters west of Alvernon Way with a 2014 ADT of 29,475 Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Yes 10 meters north of 22nd Street with a 2015 ADT of 37,351 Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: The site was relocated in October, 2001 to a Tucson Water well site 50 meters west of the original location. The move was necessitated by an intersection improvement project and anticipated construction on the northwest corner. The shelter was moved again in January, 2004, to a different corner within the well site, and the probe was attached to a wall in virtually the same location as before the shelter was moved, so airflow from the intersection would remain unrestricted. 22nd & Alvernon continues to measure the highest CO concentrations in the network. The prevailing morning- hour southeasterly winds usually disperse CO generated in the intersection. During stagnant conditions, especially during the winter inversion formation, CO generated in the intersection has a longer residence time. Although population exposure is limited at this location, 22nd & Alvernon is representative of worstcase intersections in Tucson. This site has been operating continuously since 1975. No exceedances of the eight-hour health standard were recorded in 1989 through 2016. 82 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan CHERRY & GLENN: AQS # 040191021 Site Description Site Name CHERRY & GLENN AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191021 2745 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 32.25658 / -110.948650 2400 Gravel in fenced compound, paved parking lot, streets This site is located in a predominately residential neighborhood, approximately 0.8 km northwest of a high traffic count intersection. Directly south and west of the site is a private High School enrolling approximately 1200 students. 83 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA CHERRY & GLENN CARBON MONOXIDE 054 1 42101 /1 NAAQS comparison / Population Exposure Population Exposure Thermo Scientific / 48c FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a Special Purpose Neighborhood 4289 0 0 Continuous / Seasonal monitor operation from Jan 1- March 31 and Oct.1 – Dec. 31 4.9 meters above the ground on a shelter in a city water well site. FEP Teflon / 5.47 seconds 360 1.1meters n/a n/a 8.7 meters n/a n/a 0.8 kilometers north of Grant Road with a 2014 ADT of 34,034 0.5 kilometers west of Campbell Avenue with a 2014 ADT of 35,740 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Cherry & Glenn was established as a special purpose site in February 1989, in order to assess the CO levels at a distance (less than 1 kilometer) from a typical high-volume intersection. This site has historically recorded very low levels of CO during the summer months. Consequently, in 2001, seasonal monitoring began with sampling from October through March. 84 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan GOLF LINKS & KOLB: AQS # 040191031 Site Description Site Name GOLF LINKS & KOLB AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191031 2601 South Kolb Road 32.191180 / -110.840550 2692 Dirt lot and easement, paved street This site is located near the southeast corner of Golf Links and Kolb roads in a City of Tucson water reservoir site. Light commercial enterprises occupy all four corners and separate the intersection from residential neighborhoods. 85 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of hourly observations Number / Dates of standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT GOLF LINKS & KOLB CARBON MONOXIDE 054 1 42101 / 1 NAAQS comparison / Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Thermo Scientific/ 48C FRM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a Special Purpose Microscale 4384 0 0 Continuous / Seasonal Monitor operating Jan. 1- March 31 and Oct. 1 – Dec. 31 3.0 meters above the ground on a pole located next to Kolb road FEP Teflon / 28.96 seconds 360 n/a n/a n/a 2.7 meters n/a n/a 100 meters south of Golf Links, with a 2014 ADT of 37,210 2 meters east of Kolb Road, with a 2015 ADT of 40,034 Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Golf Links & Kolb was established as a special purpose site in September 2002, as part of the Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan. Inlet placement qualifies it as a microscale site, and sighting it on the southeastern quarter of the intersection provides an opposite wind direction compliment to the 22/Alvernon site. This site is operated seasonally, from October through March. 86 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan SAGUARO PARK EAST: AQS # 040190021 Site Description Site Name SAGUARO PARK EAST AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040190021 3905 South Old Spanish Trail, Tucson, AZ 32.174538 / -110.737116 3089 Natural desert This site is situated in the National Park. The nearby light residential area has no significant local sources of ozone precursors. 87 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name SAGUARO PARK EAST Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height OZONE Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA 047 1 44201 /1 NAAQS comparison / Highest Concentration Maximum ozone concentration Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a SLAMS Neighborhood 365 Two / 5/3, 5/28 one in 1999, 2003, 2005, 2008; three in 2011; one in 2014 Continuous 4.1 meters above the ground in Saguaro National Park East on the roof of a shelter that is one kilometer south of the administration building. FEP Teflon / 6.58 seconds 360 1.22 meters n/a n/a – (trailer was removed) 8.0 meters n/a n/a 80 meters east to Old Spanish Trail with a 2015 ADT of 6,535 105 meters south of Escalante with a 2015 ADT of 2,740 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: The Saguaro National Park site has been active since 1982. The operation of the site was taken over by the National Park Service in 1987. The Park Service returned operation of the site to Pima County in 1993. Geographically, Saguaro National Park is on the eastern edge of the Tucson metropolitan area. Ozone data from this site has been used to study how the levels of ozone affect natural vegetation. 88 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan FAIRGROUNDS: AQS # 040191020 Site Description Site Name FAIRGROUNDS AQS ID Address Latitude / Longitude Elevation Surrounding landscape Location description 040191020 11330 S. Houghton Road, Tucson, AZ 32.047680 / -110.774350 3078 Natural desert vegetation on lag gravel This site is situated in an undisturbed natural desert area to the north and east. The Pima County Fairgrounds and drag strip are located directly southwest of the site. 89 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan Monitoring Information Site Name Pollutant Method code Number of monitors Parameter code / POC Basic monitoring objective / Statement of purpose Site type Instrument Manufacturer / Model FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting agency / Reporting agency Analytical lab Monitor type Scale Number of daily observations Number / Dates of 8-hour standard exceedances in 2016 Historical exceedances Current Sampling frequency / Season Probe height Probe material / Residence time Degrees of unrestricted air flow Distance from supporting structure Distance from obstruction on roof Distance from obstruction not on roof Distance from trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue Distance between collocated monitors/ Schedule / Collocated monitor type Nearest roads distance & direction to monitor / ADT Site meets 40 CFR 58, Appx. A,C,D,E MSA FAIRGROUNDS OZONE 047 1 44201 / 1 NAAQS comparison / Background Background Thermo Scientific / 49i FEM PDEQ/ PDEQ n/a Special Purpose / SLAMS January, 2017 Urban 365 0 One in 2008 and 2011 Continuous 3.6 meters above the ground on a shelter on Tucson’s far southeast side FEP Teflon / 8.64 seconds 360 1.22 meters n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 53 meters west of Houghton road with a 2015 ADT of 11,752 Yes Tucson, AZ 8520 Comments: Fairgrounds was established in October 1989. Ozone concentrations at this site have been the highest in the network on occasion. This may be due to the afternoon wind shift that takes place almost daily in the Tucson basin. The wind may be transporting urban ozone precursors or stable ozone to the far east end of the Tucson air planning area. 90 Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C