State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan For the Year 2014 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section July 1, 2014 Final State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................... 6 2.1 NAAQS COMPLIANCE NETWORK ...................................................................................................... 6 2.2 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) AND MAINTENANCE AREA NETWORK..................................... 6 2.3 SOURCE-ORIENTED NETWORK ........................................................................................................... 7 2.4 NCORE NETWORK.............................................................................................................................. 7 2.5 METEOROLOGICAL NETWORK............................................................................................................ 7 2.6 PHOTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT MONITORING STATIONS (PAMS) ..................................................... 8 2.7 NATIONAL AIR TOXICS TREND SITES (NATTS) ................................................................................ 8 2.8 CHEMICAL SPECIATION NETWORK (CSN) ......................................................................................... 8 2.9 CLASS 1 AREA NETWORK AND IMPROVE PROGRAM ....................................................................... 9 2.10 AIRNOW REPORTING ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.11 URBAN HAZE NETWORK .................................................................................................................. 9 2.12 E-BAM NETWORK OF PM 2.5 SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS ............................................................ 9 2.13 ARIZONA / MEXICO BORDER NETWORK......................................................................................... 10 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION ................................................................................... 11 3.1 SITE CLOSURES ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 NEW SITES PLANNED ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 NETWORK CHANGES – CURRENT AND PLANNED ............................................................................. 11 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS ............................................................................................... 15 4.1 PM 2.5 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................. 15 4.2 PM 10 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 18 4.3 O 3 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 21 4.4 PB MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 22 4.5 SO 2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................. 23 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 2 4.6 NO 2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................ 24 4.7 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 25 4.8 PAMS MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................. 26 4.9 NCORE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................ 28 4.10 SIP MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................ 29 NOTE: SITES IN ITALICS ARE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN SIP; OTHERS MEET THE GENERAL SIP REQUIREMENT THAT REPRESENTATIVE MONITORING BE CONDUCTED (NO SPECIFIC MONITORING SITES ARE NAMED IN SIP). ............................................................................................................................... 30 4.11 SOURCE COMPLIANCE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................... 30 4.12 CLASS 1 VISIBILITY NETWORK ...................................................................................................... 32 4.13 URBAN HAZE MONITORING NETWORK .......................................................................................... 33 4.14 METEOROLOGY MONITORING NETWORK ....................................................................................... 34 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................................................................................. 36 5.1 ADEQ QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND PROJECT PLANS ....................................................... 37 5.2 EPA QA REPORTS AND NETWORK PERFORMANCE .......................................................................... 38 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................39 APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS.........................................................................................................43 APPENDIX C SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES ......................................................................54 APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES .......................................................................84 APPENDIX E MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CRITERIA POLLUTANTS.............................136 APPENDIX F REQUEST FOR SITING WAIVER…………………………………................. ........140 APPENDIX G INTERAGENCY AIR QUALITY MONITORING FOR ARIZONA …................. ...143 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, § 58.10(a), requiring the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual monitoring network plan for the year 2014. This plan informs EPA Region 9 of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 2013, as well as activities ADEQ will undertake through December 2015. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database and to AirNow. In 40 CFR Part 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart J specifies that 40 CFR Part 58 Subpart -C contain the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality. Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors located at carefully selected physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors include: • State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) • National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore) • Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) • Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) • National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) • Special Purpose Monitors (SPM) • Urban Haze monitoring sites • Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) • AirNow information sites • Source-oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry) • Meteorological sites This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meets the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendices A, C, D, and E as follows: State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 4 • Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring • Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology • Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring • Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring The results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they should be modified to continue meeting their objectives and data needs. Modifications can include the termination of existing stations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the monitoring networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and regulatory compliant air quality data. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 5 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C of this Network Plan. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics. Appendix D of this Network Plan lists information on each of ADEQ's current and recently closed monitoring sites, including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs in which ADEQ participates is described in the following sections. 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network ADEQ’s compliance network consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ozone (O 3 ), particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb). For each of these pollutants, EPA has established national air quality standards to protect public health. The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments designated by EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria: • Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant • Objectives and spatial scales • Sampling frequency • Collocation • Special NCore-related requirements • Meteorology • Probe location and other restrictions within a site • Periodic performance evaluations • Quality Assurance • Data reporting 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently in non- attainment for one or more of the NAAQS, and in areas where the NAAQS have been met but on-going demonstration of maintenance is required. Specific monitoring requirements for each of these areas are described in their respective SIPs and/or Maintenance Plans. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 6 2.3 Source-Oriented Network Several major point sources in the state are required to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , as part of their air quality permit. Some of the source-generated data from these sites have been submitted to AQS. As indicated in the 2012 Network Plan, ADEQ met with Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold, Inc. (FMMI) to discuss the role of Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the Miami Golf Course PM 10 , Miami Townsite SO 2 , and Miami Jones Ranch SO 2 monitors. ADEQ collocated instruments at these sites to meet the PQAO requirements for submittal of these data to AQS. ADEQ installed the PM 10 monitor at the Miami Golf Course site in fall 2012, and the SO 2 monitors at the Miami Jones Ranch site and Miami Townsite in early 2013. Data are being collected from both the FMMI and ADEQ monitors at these sites for at least one year for comparability analysis and preparation of the comparative data analysis review for submittal to EPA. After data comparison of the PM10 at Miami Golf Course, the data were found to be reasonably comparable and FMMI has stopped monitoring at the site. The data comparison for the SO2 will be completed in the near future and if found to be comparable, FMMI will have the option to stop monitoring at these sites as well. Discussions with American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCO) are ongoing to have ADEQ collocate SO 2 at sites in and around Hayden, AZ. 2.4 NCore Network EPA describes the nationwide NCore network, which is composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites, as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some objectives of the NCore network include: • Tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants; • Support for long-term health assessments which contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS; • Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines • Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses. As required by 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site, JLG Supersite, was operational by January 1, 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples include advanced communications and serial data collection, remote zero/span/precision (Z/S/P) checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instruments, and instruments that monitor additional pollutants that may be added to current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html 2.5 Meteorological Network ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ continues to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that were not previously equipped, and for which there are adequate facilities to support the State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 7 meteorological tower and equipment. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of O 3 , oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total reactive nitrogen (NOy), speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, ADEQ began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of O 3 . The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR Part 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their monitoring networks in O 3 nonattainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutants and meteorological data are the widespread nonattainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQ operates three PAMS sites to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area: JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley (type 3), and VEI (meteorological). EPA assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and to consider the possible re-invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and included PAMS objectives, methods, network design, and quality assurance. ADEQ participates in the PAMS re-engineering process and will continue to follow its activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network. 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of EPA identified air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes to the human exposure from air toxics. Detection of increased human toxicity risk can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long-term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. ADEQ’s JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix MSA. 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM 2.5 samples collected at select sites throughout the country. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs. The network has increased to around 200 sites nationwide. PM 2.5 speciation monitoring at JLG Supersite includes two CSN PM 2.5 speciation samplers. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision and bias information for the IMPROVE network and the data are reasonably comparable to the CSN speciation data. In 2009, the URG 3000N sampler was added at JLG for collecting the carbon sample in lieu of the Met One SuperSASS, which had been used to collect all three types of filter samples e.g. Quartz, Teflon, and Nylon. The laboratory analysis method for carbon samples collected by the URG also changed. These changes to the CSN program’s monitoring and analytical design were State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 8 geared toward more closely matching the carbon analytes from the CSN sampler to those collected via the IMPROVE network. 2.9 Class 1 Area Network and IMPROVE Program The rural visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class 1 areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 Federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests, which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were larger than 6,000 acres, and to which visual air was an important resource for the visitor experience. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine Class 1 areas are located in USFS land and three in NPS land. EPA initiated the nationally-operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987, whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 wilderness areas across the United States. Ten Class 1 IMPROVE sites were originally placed in and around these Class 1 areas. One of these sites, Grand Canyon National Park-Indian Gardens, has been shut down recently. Additionally, ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites identified as Protocol sites. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class 1 Visibility and IMPROVE networks. 2.10 AirNow Reporting ADEQ reports near real-time data for of its continuous air quality monitors to the AirNow system. The AirNow system is a set of near real-time public maps which report an Air Quality Index (AQI) for the five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act. These pollutants are: ground-level O 3 , PM, CO, SO 2 , and NO 2 . The purpose of the AQI is to help understand what local air quality means to your health. To make it easier to understand, the AQI is divided into six color coded categories: Good, Moderate, Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups, Unhealthy, Very Unhealthy and Hazardous. ADEQ will continue to expand efforts for data submission to AirNow to support the collection and nationwide dissemination of consistently provided air quality data in the AQI. The AQI format is used by local weather forecasters, medical facilities, schools and the general public to make health-related activity decisions based on the reported local AQI. 2.11 Urban Haze Network The purpose of the Urban Haze Network is to provide State and Local policy-makers and the public with information regarding the urban haze levels, track short-term and long-term trends, assess source contributions, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. ADEQ utilizes transmissometers, particulate monitors, and/or digital camera systems to evaluate urban visibility. More than a decade of urban visibility data has been collected for the Phoenix and Tucson area. Currently, only the Phoenix metropolitan area urban visibility is monitored using high resolution cameras. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13. 2.12 E-BAM Network of PM2.5 Special Purpose Monitors E-BAM monitors are special purpose monitors which provide continuous, real-time particulate concentration data that is useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns and wildfire State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 9 monitoring. The current network of special purpose continuous particulate monitors (listed in Table 2.12-1) is composed of lightweight, portable E-BAM monitors typically in self-contained, environmentally sealed enclosures. They can be battery or solar powered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. Data are sampled every second and concentrations are calculated and recorded every minute. E-BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United States. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily in populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from prescribed burns and wildfires. In 2011 ADEQ configured the E-BAM monitors to measure PM 2.5 to be consistent with the National Forest Service monitors. Hourly PM 2.5 data from the E-BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx. Table 2.12-1 Current Locations of E-BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Payson Well 204 W. Aero Dr., Payson, AZ 85541 Prescott College AQD 226 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322 2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network ADEQ works with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group’s primary priority is reviewing the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluating the adequacy of these networks. The secondary priority of this group is to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are expected to develop, such that data are shared across the border and capacity is built to meet the needs of the air monitoring program objectives. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 10 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION This section provides a summary of changes to ADEQ's monitoring networks completed since the 2013 Network Plan submission, as well as changes planned for July 2014 through December 2015. Any occurrence of unplanned changes due to emerging needs, budget constraints, or other circumstances will be documented in next year’s Air Monitoring Network Plan, and ADEQ will communicate with EPA Region 9 regarding any significant changes on a case-by-case basis. Below is a summary of the planned network changes. Details regarding these changes can be found in Section 4 of this Monitoring Network Plan. 3.1 Site Closures Prescott Valley – Although monitoring in Prescott Valley began in 2007, the MSA population does not require PM 10 or PM 2.5 monitoring there. Statistical analysis shows that these monitors are reporting concentrations significantly below the NAAQS. ADEQ shut down both PM 10 and PM 2.5 monitors at this site on January 1, 2014. Instruments were removed on January 16, 2013. 3.2 New Sites Planned Lake Havasu City, AZ – ADEQ plans to add monitoring in Lake Havasu City due to it being recently designated an MSA. As there are no data from this area, modeling will be utilized to determine the area of highest concentration. The data will be used for regulatory purposes as part of the NAAQS Compliance Network and will be used to determine if monitoring will be needed in the future. An O 3 , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 monitor is planned to be added by January 2016. Sierra Vista, AZ – ADEQ plans to add O 3 monitoring in Sierra Vista due to it being recently designated an MSA. As there is no data from this area, modeling will be utilized to determine the area of highest concentration. The data will be used for regulatory purposes as part of the NAAQS Compliance Network, and will be used to determine if monitoring will be needed in the future. Currently the Sierra Vista MSA has a PM 10 monitor and a PM 2.5 monitor in Douglas, AZ. These are located in the area of highest concentration and will used to satisfy the requirements for PM 10 and PM 2.5 monitoring for the MSA. The O 3 monitor is planned to be added by January 2016. 3.3 Network Changes – Current and Planned Ajo – A temperature and RH probe was added on February 11, 2014 to match the ADEQ’s meteorological setup as found at all other sites. Alamo Lake – This site is currently the transport/background site for the O 3 network. The site is sufficiently remote that it is being configured to be the designated background site for several pollutants. ADEQ installed a Met One PM 10 FEM BAM 1020 at Alamo Lake on October 30, 2013, a Met One PM 2.5 FEM BAM 1020 on November 15, 2013,and an Ecotech SO 2 9850T on January 14, 2014. An Ecotech NO x 9841, A CO analyzer, and meteorological instruments will be installed in the next year. The SO 2 , NO x , and CO analyzers are designated as State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 11 SPM for the purpose of providing background data as a part of Arizona’s permitting process, SIP development, and for modeling. This will allow permit applicants to use same background data throughout the entire state. The plan is to discontinue these monitors after two years of monitoring. Flagstaff PM 10 and PM 2.5 – The statistical analysis for Flagstaff shows that PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations are significantly below the NAAQS and monitors are not required for this area based on MSA population. ADEQ shut down both the PM 10 and PM 2. monitors on January 1, 2014. Instruments were removed on January 2, 2014. See Section 3.5 for the statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR §58.14(c)(1). Payson Well Site PM 10 – Part of the network planning process is to assess the representativeness of the monitors for sampling ambient air. There have been several structural changes at the Payson Well Site that are limiting airflow around this monitor. These include construction of new buildings and growth of trees. ADEQ met with the site manager to define a more suitable location. On December 2, 2013, ADEQ received delivery of a shelter to houseaPM 10 FEM BAM 1020. In May 2014 electrical power was established to the shelter at Payson Well Site and on May 21, 2014 the PM 10 FEM BAM 1020 was installed thereby replacing the collocated Thermo Partisol PM 10 FRM monitors starting July 1, 2014. As a result, this site will no longer be collocated for PM 10, as there is no collocation requirement for PM 10 FEM monitors. Prescott College O 3 – In 2013, the administration at Prescott College contacted ADEQ with plans to renovate the building where the O 3 analyzer was located. The renovation was aligned so that the full 2013 O 3 season was monitored, and then the instrument was shut down and removed. The location of the analyzer did not meet siting requirements pertaining to the proximity of a roadway. With Grove Avenue having a daily traffic count of 17,650, a minimum distance of 30m is required. The distance to the roadway of the old location was only 8m, thus requiring ADEQ to submit a yearly waiver to EPA Region 9. The new location is still located at Prescott College, (See Figure 3.3-3) but now meets the siting requirements and is 45m from the roadway. The new location is located 180m to the southwest of the previous site and is free of any obstructions from trees or other buildings. The site change resulted in an address change from 336 Grove Ave. to 226 Grove Ave. Since the site is so close in proximity to the old site, and is now meeting siting requirements, the AQS ID will remain the same. The analyzer was shut off due to the end of O 3 season on November 1, 2013, and was removed from the previous location. The instrument was shut off during O 3 season and on January 16, 2014 a Teledyne 400e analyzer was installed, replacing the Thermo 49c analyzer for continuous monitoring of O 3 . Data recovery started March 1, 2014 at the beginning of O 3 season. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 12 Figure 3.3 1 Google Earth Image of the New and Old Location of the Prescott College O 3 Analyzer Prescott Valley - The statistical analysis for Prescott Valley shows that PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations are significantly below the NAAQS and that monitors are not required for this area based on MSA population. ADEQ shut down both the PM 10 and PM 2. monitors on January 1, 2014 and instruments were removed on January 2, 2014. Table 3.3-1 Instruments Changes Made from July 2013 thru June 2014 Site Name Monitors Date of Change Ajo Temp and RH 11-Feb-2014 A temperature and RH sensor were installed for forecasting purposes. Alamo Lake PM 10 30-Oct-2013 A Met One FEM BAM 1020 PM 10 was deployed to the site in October 2013 and designated as Background. Alamo Lake PM 2.5 15-Nov-2013 A Met One FEM BAM 1020 PM 2.5 was deployed to the site in November 2013 and designated as Background. Alamo Lake SO 2 14-Jan-2014 An Ecotech SO 2 9850T was installed in January 2014 and designated as a special purpose monitor. Description State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 13 Site Name Monitors Date of Change Ajo Temp and RH 11-Feb-2014 Flagstaff Middle School Payson Well Site PM 10 , PM 2.5 PM 10 Description A temperature and RH sensor were installed for forecasting purposes. 1-Jan-2014 Monitors were discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E-BAM) will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website. Ozone monitoring will continue at this site. 21-May-2014 Collocated Partisol FRM PM 10 monitors were replaced with a PM 10 FEM BAM 1020. Starting on July 1, 2014, the BAM will replace the Partisol’s. Collocation is not required at this site. Monitoring to be relocated within site property. Prescott Valley PM 10 , PM 2.5 1-Jan-2014 Monitors were discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. System modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR 58.14(C)(1). A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E-BAM) will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website. Prescott College O3 1-Nov-2013 Prescott College O 3 analyzer was moved to a new location on campus due to renovation of previous location. A Teledyne 400e replaced the Thermo 49c at this time. AQS ID remains the same. Table 3.4-2 Instrument Changes Planned for July 2014 to December 2015 Site Name Monitors Date of Change Description Alamo Lake CO 1-Jan-2015 A CO monitor will be deployed to the site as a SPM for background data purposes. Alamo Lake NO x 1-Jan-2015 An Ecotech NO x 9841 will be deployed to this site as a SPM for background data purposes by 1-Jan-2015. Alamo Lake Temp, RH, and Wind 1-Jan-2015 Full meteorological equipment will be deployed to this site by 1-Jan2015. 1-Jan-2016 Monitors will be planned for installation at new site starting Jan. 2016. 1-Jan-2016 Monitor will be planned for installation at new site starting Jan. 2016. Lake Havasu City PM 10 , PM 2.5, O 3 Sierra Vista O3 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 14 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS The minimum monitoring requirements for each pollutant are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas. Current minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Tables 4.0-1 and 4.0-2 outline metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas in Arizona as identified by the U.S. Census Bureau. Table 4.0-1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population Flagstaff Coconino County 134,421 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 200,186 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887 Prescott Yavapai County 211,033 Sierra Vista-Douglas Cochise 131,346 Tucson Pima County 980,263 Yuma Yuma County 195,751 Table 4.0-2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420 Payson Gila 53,597 Safford Graham & Greenlee Counties 37,220 Show Low Navajo 107,449 4.1 PM2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0-1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1-1). State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 15 Table 4.1-1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Most recent 3-Yr design value ≥ 85% of any PM 2.5 NAAQS * Most recent 3-Yr design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS * or no Design Value Available >1,000,000 3 2 500,000 – <1,000,000 2 1 50,000 – <500,000 1 0 Population (MSA) *85% Annual NAAQS (12 μg/m3) = 10.2 μg/m3; 85% 24-Hour NAAQS (35 μg/m3) = 29.75 μg/m3 The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter-based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1-2). 40 CFR §58.12 (d)(1) states the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor. Table 4.1-2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ Sites 2011-2013 2011-2013 24-Hour Design Annual Design Value (μg/m3) Value (μg/m3) 12 6.7 Continuous Sample AQS Site ID Site Name Frequency 04-003-1005 Douglas Red Cross 04-012-8000 Alamo Lake1 N/A1 N/A1 Continuous 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite 22 8.5 Continuous 04-023-0004 Nogales Post Office 26 9.6 1 in 6 Day 04-027-8011 Yuma Supersite2 16 7.8 Continuous 1 PM 2.5 monitoring will began on November 5, 2013 and be designated as the Background site for the PM 2.5 Network 2 Designated Transport site in the PM 2.5 Network State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 16 ADEQ currently operates EPA-approved FEM monitors at six PM 2.5 monitoring sites. An EPA-approved FEM monitor was deployed to the Alamo Lake site in January 2014; this site is the designated as the PM 2.5 monitoring network’s Background site. Yuma Supersite is designated as the required PM 2.5 Transport site. ADEQ operates both an EPA-approved FEM continuous monitor and a Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM at the JLG Supersite fulfilling an NCore collocation requirement. The EPA-approved FEM sampler is designated the primary PM 2.5 monitor for NAAQS compliance purposes. Several non-FEM continuous PM 2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are associated with the Smoke Management E-BAM network. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the E-BAM network. 4.1.1 PM 2.5 Collocation Requirements For the ADEQ PM 2.5 network, one site is required to have collocated monitoring. The Nogales Post Office site has the highest PM 2.5 design value in ADEQ’s PM 2.5 network and is therefore the designated PM 2.5 collocated site. ADEQ operates both an EPA-approved FEM continuous instrument and two Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instruments at the Nogales Post Office site. The FEM BAM 1020 is designated as the primary PM 2.5 monitor for this site, thus enabling ADEQ to exceed the required 1-in-3 day monitoring frequency. This combination of instruments also fulfills the collocation requirement of the PM 2.5 network for ADEQ. The QA collocated Partisol PM 2.5 FRM operates on a 1-in-6 day monitoring frequency rather than the required 1-in-12 day monitoring frequency. Additionally, ADEQ operates one Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instrument and one continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor at the JLG Supersite. This PM 2.5 FEM is designated the primary instrument as required by NCore. The PM 2.5 FEM monitor is also labeled as an NCore PM coarse paired monitor. The PM 2.5 FRM instrument is labeled as a QA collocated instrument for the site. Table 4.1-3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 2.5 collocation requirements. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 17 Table 4.1-3 PM 2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code (Instrument Type) # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 143 (Partisol 2000) 2 0 0 0 170 (Met One BAM 1020) 5 5 1 2 4.1.2 Relocating Any Violating PM 2.5 Monitors ADEQ does not have any violating PM 2.5 monitors that are being considered for relocation. A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is required and described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone. The analysis includes a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor. 4.2 PM10 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on the population of the area (see Table 4.2-1) and design values for PM 10 24-hour concentrations (see Table 4.2-2). Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have delegated authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 nonattainment areas in those counties. JLG Supersite PM 10 concentrations for NCore are provided by the PM 10 FEM BAM 1020. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 18 Table 4.2-1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Medium Low Concentration Concentration Less than 80% of Exceeds 80% of 24-Hour NAAQS 24-Hour NAAQS (>120µg/m3) (<120 µg/m3) or no Design Value Available High Concentration Exceeds 24-Hour MSA Population NAAQS by 20% or more (>180µg/m3) >1,000,000 6-10 4-8 2-4 500,000 – <1,000,000 4-8 2-4 1-2 250,000 – <500,000 3-4 1-2 0-1 100,000 – <250,000 1-2 0-1 0 The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12(e) states that for PM 10 sites, “…the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24-hour standard.” ADEQ has transitioned most PM 10 monitors from filter-based methods to continuous methods. By July1, 2014 all the primary PM 10 monitors in the ADEQ PM 10 network will be continuous methods. Payson Well Site will continue as the PM10 collocated filter-based monitoring station until July 1, 2014. Table 4.2-2 lists the PM 10 network site Design Values and Annual Means Table 4.2-2 PM 10 Design Values (Estimated Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 2011 - 2013 Average Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μg/m3 Including Events 2011 – 2013 Average Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μg/m3 Excluding Events 2013 Annual Mean Concentration (μg/m3) 04-003-0011 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 1.0 0.7 20.6 04-003-1005 Douglas Red Cross 2.0 0.7 37.3 04-007-0008 Payson Well Site 0 0 19.1 04-007-1001 Hayden Old Jail 1.046 1.4 42.5 04-007-8000 Miami Golf Course 0 0* 22.6 04-012-8000 Alamo Lake N/A1 N/A1 N/A1 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 19 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite 2.0 0.7 30.5 04-015-1003 Bullhead City 1.0 0.7 20.6 04-019-0001 Ajo 1.0 04-019-0020 Rillito 04-023-0004 Nogales Post Office 0* 04-023-0004 Nogales Post Office 2 04-027-8011 Yuma Supersite 28.6 1.7 5.044 40.4 3.7 35.8 0* 43.7 1.7 5.011 41.0 5.7 * Annual values not meeting completeness criteria 1 Monitoring at Alamo Lake began on Oct.. 30, 2013 4.2.1 PM 10 Collocation Requirements There are no collocation requirements for EPA-approved PM 10 FEM monitors. ADEQ has transitioned the PM 10 network to continuous FEM monitors. ADEQ does operate an additional Partisol 2000 FRM at the Nogales Post Office site. While the FEM is designated as the primary PM 10 monitor, the Partisol 2000 monitor is designated a QA collocated PM 10 instrument. Table 4.2-3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 10 collocation requirements. Table 4.2-3 PM 10 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 126 (Partisol 2000) 1 0* 0* 0* 079 (TEOM) 8 8 0 0 122 (BAM) 4 4 0 0 * The Partisol 2000 monitors at the Payson Well Site will be replaced with a single FEM BAM 1020 beginning July 2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 20 4.3 O3 Monitoring Network Requirements Table 4.3-1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8-hour Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) Most recent 3 year 8-hour Design Value <85% NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) or no Design Value available >10 Million 4 2 4 – <10 Million 3 1 350,000 – <4 Million 2 1 50,000 – <350,000 1 0 The minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown above in Table 4.3-1. ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3-2). ADEQ is updating the O 3 network with remote zero/span/precision checks utilizing the Teledyne T703 UV Photometric O 3 Calibrator with Internal Zero Air Pump and External Zero Air Shut-Off Valve. This will allow air monitoring staff to more efficiently maintain the O 3 network while minimizing travel time during the O 3 season, and avoiding calibration during the peak hours of the day when O 3 levels are highest. Additionally, Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties operate O 3 monitors. Table 4.3-2 ADEQ O 3 Sites and Design Values AQS Site ID Site Current Operating Schedule 2011-2013 Design Value (ppm) 04-005-1008 Flagstaff Middle School March - October 0.069 04-007-0010 Tonto National Monument March - October 0.075 04-012-8000 Alamo Lake March - October 0.072 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite January - December 0.077 04-021-8001 Queen Valley March - October 0.076 04-025-8033 Prescott College AQD March - October 0.069 04-027-8011 Yuma Supersite March - October 0.076 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 21 4.3.1 O 3 Season In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), “Deviation from the [January-to-December] O 3 monitoring season must be approved by the EPA Regional Administrator, documented in the annual network plan, and updated in AQS. Information on how to analyze O 3 data to support a change to the O 3 season in support of the 8-hour standard for a specific state can be found in reference 8 to this appendix”. Reference 8 refers to the Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8-hour Ozone Standard. In compliance with this document, ADEQ analyzed the most recent seven years of O 3 data (2007-2013 O 3 data from ADEQ sites) to create the chart in Figure 4.3-1, which is the basis of ADEQ’s request for modifying the O 3 season to March through October. The only two days in October > 75 ppb occurred in 2009, which included an unusually high number of exceedance days. The O 3 season was extended in 2012 to include March because some parts of Arizona begin experiencing low concentrations of O 3 in March. ADEQ does additional monitoring in the off-season of November – February for its own purposes; however, those data are not being reported to the AQS database. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule. Figure 4.3-1 Average Number of Days O 3 > 75 ppb all ADEQ Sites Combined 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ has operated three source-oriented TSP Hi-Vol Pb monitors between the Globe Highway site (collocated) and the Miami Golf Course site since January 2011. 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D states that at a minimum, there must be one source-oriented SLAMS site located to measure the maximum Pb concentration in ambient air resulting from each non-airport source which emits 0.50 or more tons per year and each airport source which emits 1.0 or more tons per year. Per the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) 2011, there are no non-airport sources in the 0.5-1.0 ton per year category. For the NCore-Pb requirement, ADEQ uses the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples and on June 1, 2012 received EPA approval for the ICP-MS analysis method for lead in PM 10 . No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 22 changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb-PM 10 data collected at JLG Supersite; however, parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with these data in AQS. 4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements ADEQ’s Pb network requires only one collocated site. The Globe Highway site located in Hayden, AZ has the highest design value in the Pb network and is therefore the collocated site. Although ADEQ monitors NCore-Pb at the JLG Supersite, collocated NCore-Pb sites are determined by the EPA and JLG Supersite is not a designated NCore-Pb collocated site. Table 4.4-1 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements. Table 4.4-1 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 191 (Pb-TSP ICP/MS) 2 2 1 1 202 (Pb-PM 10 ICP/MS) 1 1 0* 0 * Pb-PM 10 monitor is located at an NCore site and does not require collocation Table 4.4-2 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 2011-2013 Design Value (µg/m3) 04-007-1002 Globe Highway 0.27 04-007-8000 Miami Golf Course 0.06 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite --* * Design Value not available 4.5 SO2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates a network of six SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima Counties. Additionally, two sources, ASARCO and FMMI, operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for permit compliance and to support SIP rule requirements. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both sources to ensure that the monitors are operated under the required quality assurance requirements. In Miami, ADEQ runs the Miami Ridgeline site and added SO 2 monitors at the Miami Townsite and Jones Ranch sites, which FMMI has been monitoring. For Hayden, ADEQ currently operates an SO 2 monitor at Hayden Old Jail. ADEQ initiated discussions with ASARCO regarding Globe Highway and Montgomery Ranch on the best means to meet the PQAO requirements. ADEQ also operates a trace-level SO 2 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 23 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. An SO 2 monitor was placed at Alamo Lake in February 2014 and is designated as the background SPM monitor. The SO 2 monitoring requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a Population Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor, PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors, and PWEIs greater than 1,000,000 require three SO 2 monitors. There are no PWEI greater than 5,000 in Arizona, but there are other SO 2 monitors in Arizona, which are operated by Maricopa County and Pima County. Table 4.5-1 SO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 2011-2013 1-Hour Design Value (ppb) 04-012-8000 Alamo Lake N/A 04-007-0011 Miami Jones Ranch N/A 04-007-0009 Miami Ridgeline 105 04-007-0012 Miami Townsite N/A 04-007-1001 Hayden Old Jail 266 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite 6 4.6 NO2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ currently operates only one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona with one planned to be deployed this year. These NO 2 monitors are located at the JLG Supersite and Alamo Lake. JLG is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement and Alamo Lake is designated as a background SPM site. The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near-roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near-roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 and containing roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT require two near-roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0-1, two CBSAs within Arizona (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) contain populations greater than 500,000, and therefore, require at least one NO 2 near-roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA exceeds 2.5 million in population; therefore, two nearroadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. Pima and Maricopa Counties will operate the required nearroadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix, respectively. In addition to the near-roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area-wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 24 metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that requires ambient monitoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors operated by Maricopa and Pima Counties are meeting the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements required by the PAMS program. See Table 4.6-1 for design values. Table 4.6-1 NO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2011-2013 2013 Annual Mean (ppb) AQS Site ID Site Name 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite 55 16.98 04-012-8000 Alamo Lake NA NA 1-Hour Design Value (ppb) 4.7 Carbon monoxide (CO) Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates only one CO monitor throughout Arizona, with plans to operate a second at Alamo Lake as a background SPM. The current CO monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and has sufficient sensitivity to monitor trace levels. This CO monitor fulfills NCore as well as PAMS monitoring requirements. Maricopa and Pima Counties operate the other required CO monitors within the State of Arizona. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million population requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near-road NO 2 monitor. The required near-roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County. The most recent census data show the Tucson MSA is below one million and therefore near-road CO monitoring is not required. The Trace-Level CO (COTL) analyzer that is currently operated by ADEQ exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. Due to the low range at which the JLG COTL analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution be exercised when utilizing these data for the purpose of NAAQS compliance. Under most circumstances, the data would be used to determine compliance with the CO NAAQS. However, due to the consistently low ambient concentrations, the trace-level analyzer’s operating range is set at 05 ppm, which is the range most frequently measured at JLG. This operating range is well below the CO NAAQS of 9 ppm, therefore, when/if under certain rare circumstances, the CO concentrations are > 5 ppm, determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible, because measurement uncertainty increases and becomes challenging to statistically quantify. Table 4.7-1 contains the most recent Design Values for CO at JLG Supersite. Table 4.7-1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 04-013-9997 JLG Supersite 2013 CO 1-Hour Max. Value (ppm) 2013 CO 8-Hour Max. Value (ppm) 3.239 2.0 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 25 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required for each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, Carbonyls, NO x , trace-level reactive oxides of nitrogen (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August. ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data. JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. Since the required manual method of eight three-hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24-hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re-engineering program are available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8-1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS, but because carbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no current plans to discontinue carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite. Table 4.8-1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration VOC * Jan-Dec Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs. Carbonyl * Jan-Dec Multi-port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6th day, 1-24 hr sample (DecJan). Every 6th day, 3 – 3 hr samples (0500-0800, 0800-1100, 11001400)(June-August) CO Jan – Dec Trace CO Hourly average O3 Jan – Dec O 3 Analyzer Hourly average NOx Jan – Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec • Wind speed/direction Hourly average • Temperature • Relative humidity * 24-hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also part of the NATTS program and collected year-round. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 26 Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NOy, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011 and carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8-2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site. Table 4.8-2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration VOC June – August Multi-port sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs, and 3 – 3 hr samples (0500-0800, 1300-1600, 16001900) O3 March – October O 3 Analyzer Hourly average NOy June – August NOy Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec • Wind speed/direction Hourly average • Temperature • Relative humidity Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters), and relative humidity. The National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport collects barometric pressure and precipitation measurements. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and a Wind Profiler had also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights since 1998 until July 2012. The PAMS re-engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and very limited use of the RASS and Wind Profiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use – particularly if usable data is available from other sources. ADEQ considered the high operational cost and very limited data use when deciding to discontinue its operation. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 27 Table 4.8-3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Meteorology Jan – Dec Method • Pyranometer (total solar radiation) • Ultra-violet (UV solar) • Wind speed/direction • Temperature • Relative humidity Duration Hourly average 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has been a multipollutant monitoring site since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, including: SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, CSN, and meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9-1. The required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. . The NCore-Pb requirement is being met by using the current Partisol 2000 PM 10 sample filter) for metals speciation. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG analysis method for PM 10 metals speciation was approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) for the analysis of Pb. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore site, the parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with Pb-PM 10 data in AQS. Required Measurement Table 4.9-1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Frequency/Duration Status PM 2.5 FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, designated primary PM 2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd day Thermo Partisol 2000 is current instrument; PM 2.5 samples collected since 1999 PM 10 FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair PM coarse FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, difference method PM 2.5 speciation organic and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals 24 hour average; every 3rd day Met One SuperSASS with URG module is current instrument; STN/CSN samples collected since 1999 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 28 Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10 metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP-MS analysis method as an FEM. O3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E CO (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9830T SO 2 (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9850T NO/NO 2 /NOx Hourly Ecotech EC9841 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC9843 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Vaisala temperature/relative humidity probe currently in operation 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ, along with other delegated agencies, is responsible for the preparation and submittal of SIPs for nonattainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for areas not included within Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties or tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in the area’s SIP; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10-1 lists the ADEQ and source-operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance. Table 4.10-1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1-hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix-Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8-hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office) Douglas-Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 29 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal PM 10 (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Yuma Supersite Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction Miami, Gila SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline, Miami Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Miami Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class 1 areas Visibility Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe National Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West National Monument, Meadview Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon - Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon - Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Station, Saguaro National ParkEast, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites are named in SIP). 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 30 ADEQ requires select major and minor point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around their sources. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit or timeframe specified therein. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of instruments at some of these sites and review of ambient monitoring data submitted according to the permit requirements. Sources are required to review and validate their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11-1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. Any data submitted to AQS needs to be approved by a PQAO that meets EPA’s QA requirements. Data from the ASARCO and FMMI monitors are being used for regulatory decisions and will need to be submitted to AQS. In spring 2012, ADEQ sent letters to ASARCO and FMMI discussing the PQAO requirements and suggesting that they meet with ADEQ to discuss options. FMMI representatives met with ADEQ, and in January 2013, ADEQ established monitors at the existing FMMI’s Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites in the Miami, AZ area. Table 4.11-1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal Globe Highway Winkelman SO 2 No ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. Hayden SO 2 No ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch Hayden SO 2 No ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO 2 No Hayden Old Jail 1 Hayden SO 2 No Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No Sycamore Canyon PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology No Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation Yes (PM 10 mass only) FMMI - Miami Golf Course Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated Yes (PM 10 mass only) FMMI - Miami Jones Ranch 1 Miami SO 2 No Drake Cement FMMI - Miami Ridgeline State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 31 Site Name FMMI - Miami Townsite 1 PCC – Clarkdale NW PCC – Clarkdale SE Carlota Mine – Sanctuary City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal Miami SO 2 No Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No Globe PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology No 1 ADEQ also operates an SO 2 monitor at this site. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not. 4.12 Class 1 Visibility Network As stated previously, visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas called Class 1 areas based on designations made by the 1977 CAA Amendments. The evaluations, performed by the USFS and NPS, reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and had visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. For the Class 1 area designations, EPA initiated a nationally operated monitoring network in 1987 called the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of this network is to characterize broad regional trends in visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 areas across the United States. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class 1 areas. During 1999-2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima County, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class 1 areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12-1. In addition to the Class 1 IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12-1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and two collocated IMPROVE monitors at the JLG Supersite. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has been used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve multiple objectives. In 2012, a review of the data from the Douglas Red Cross site was prepared by Air Resource Specialists and provided to ADEQ. These data will be used to evaluate if this site should be continued or if it could be better utilized at another location. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class 1 areas within the state of Arizona. Table 4.12-1 2014 Arizona Class 1 Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 32 Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond) 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban haze by conducting studies during the winter of 1989-90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992-93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long-term, year-round monitoring of visibility in both areas. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. Executive Order 2000-3 directed by the Governor’s Brown Cloud Summit was to establish options for a visibility standard or other method to track progress in improving visibility in the Phoenix area. The Summit concluded that a daily visibility index for the metropolitan area should have its characteristics defined through a public survey process. This process called for a representative cross-section of residents of Area A (as described in House Bill 2538, roughly the Phoenix metropolitan area), to determine what visual air qualities are desirable, what visual range is acceptable, and how often the combination of acceptable visual range and air quality is preferred. Through a series of meetings in 2002 and early 2003, ADEQ and the Visibility Index Oversight Committee designed the visibility survey, selected a contractor to conduct the survey, oversaw the completion of the field portion of the survey, and defined a recommended visibility index. The Visibility Index Oversight Committee Final Report was issued in early 2003 summarizing the visibility index. Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, and digital camera systems. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, and five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area. The Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September 2010. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 33 Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network. The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13-1. ADEQ continues to evaluate the Urban Haze program. The high-resolution images from these cameras can be viewed online at http://www.phoenixvis.net. Table 4.13-1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network – Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer (Bext) (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network ADEQ operates meteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network; see Table 4.14-1. Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Currently, Alamo is the only meteorological site that does not have the full suite of meteorological instruments. A temperature and/or RH probe may be added to this site within the next year to compliment the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction. Except for the items mentioned above, ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the meteorological network, but may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 34 permit. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network can be found in Appendix B. Table 4.14-1 Meteorology Monitoring Network Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS Alamo Lake X X X No Ajo X X X No Douglas Red Cross X X X No Globe Highway X X X No Hayden Old Jail X X X No JLG Supersite X X X Yes Miami Golf Course X X X No Nogales Post Office X X X No Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant X X X No Payson Well Site X X X No Queen Valley X X X Yes Rillito X X X No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 35 Comments For NCore / PAMS support For PAMS support Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Vehicle Emissions Laboratory X X Yuma Supersite X Site Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS Comments X X X X Solar only For PAMS support X X No 5.0 Quality Assurance To ensure high quality data are produced that meet the users’ needs, ADEQ sustains a “quality system” as required by EPA. The U.S. EPA primarily specifies the quality assurance (QA) requirements for operating SLAMS, SPM, CSN, NCore, NATTS, PAMS, and PSD air monitors in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A, the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume II: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program, technical assurance documents (TADs), and other supporting guidance documents. In response, ADEQ develops quality assurance plans for air monitoring networks, which provide detailed information regarding the specifics of each air monitoring network and how data will be managed. Components of ADEQ’s quality system include, but are not limited to: • ADEQ being established as the primary quality assurance organization (PQAO) for the criteria and noncriteria pollutant air monitoring data collected and reported to AQS. • An agency-level Quality Management Plan (QMP), which is an “umbrella” document that details, in broad terms, the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities. • Division-level quality assurance program plans (QAPPs) with supporting standard operating procedures (SOPs) for each major, ongoing air monitoring network. Each QAPP describes: o Health effects of a specific pollutant and o Purpose for operating the monitoring station or network o Data quality objectives (DQOs) and/or measurement quality objectives (MQO) along with data quality indicators (DQIs) that specify the amount of tolerable error in the data using statistical metrics  ADEQ’s precision and bias results from QC checks such as verifications and performance evaluation (PE) audits apply to ADEQ’s data only while some metrics obtained by the EPA National Performance Evaluation Program (NPEP) apply to a specific network at the nationwide level. o Variety of regularly occurring quality control (QC) checks along with pass/fail criteria o Types of QA assessments and reports needed from the network, State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 36 o Data validation processes and data reporting requirements, o Additional items such as preventative measures taken to reduce data loss, corrective actions, and document control and management. In addition to QAPP requirements and/or recommendations from the U.S. EPA QA Office and/or OAQPS, the EPA Region 9 QA Office provides additional QAPP requirements for agencies under their jurisdiction that distinguish between the scope of a “program” versus “project” plan. As per EPA Region 9 guidance: o “Program Plans” describe major air monitoring networks that are essentially “permanent” with no known end dates, and o “Project Plans” describe the specifications for special air monitoring projects of limited in scope and duration. Per EPA Region 9 guidance, a draft comprehensive program plan was submitted to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, but this document was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual program plans, which provide more details for each major air monitoring program, or network. All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty or error. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement and population uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty relates to how accurately a pollutant’s concentration was measured, or sampled, and occurs during the data collection process. The measurement uncertainty among ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous because such stations operate under a set of common factors needed to effectively operate as a PQAO. Common factors typically include: • Stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field standard operating procedures (SOPs), • Common calibration facilities and standards, • Use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPPs), • Oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and • Support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters. Population uncertainty relates to how well the measurements of a pollutant from a particular air monitoring station represent the population deemed at risk. Population uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by establishing monitoring sites at the best possible location to achieve the monitoring objective. The annual network review helps to ensure air monitoring stations remain sited correctly and target the intended population. 5.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Program and Project Plans EPA requires PQAOs to update their QAPPs every five years so they remain current. For specific QA/QC information regarding pollutant measurements, please reference the appropriate QAPP for this information. ADEQ plans on using the pollutant-specific QAPPs for each parameter measured at the NCore station. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 37 For criteria pollutants, ADEQ has the following QAPPs in-place: • A Final Pb QAPP that was approved by Region 9 in January 2013. • A Final PM QAPP that was approved by Region 9 in August 2013. o The EPA produces a QAPP for the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) PM 2.5 monitoring program and ADEQ plans on adding any supplemental PM speciation air monitoring information as an addendum in 2015. • A Final O 3 , QAPP that was approved by EPA Region 9 in December 2013. • A Final SO 2 QAPP that received condition approval by EPA Region 9 in December 2013. ADEQ has been addressing EPA’s comments on this document and the revised Final QAPP will be submitted for approval in May 2014. • A Final Draft NO 2 QAPP was submitted to EPA Region 9 in March 2014 and approval is outstanding. • A Final Draft CO QAPP is near completion and will be submitted to EPA Region 9 in May or June 2014. For non-criteria pollutants, ADEQ has the following QAPPs in-place: • A Final National Air Toxics Trends Stations (NATTS), (Urban) Air Toxics Monitoring Program (ATMP), & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) QAPP that was approved EPA Region 9 in February 2008. o • ADEQ is in the process of updating this QAPP and the plan is to separate it into two QAPPs: one for the air toxics network, and one for the PAMS network. ADEQ plan on submitting these revised QAPPs to EPA Region 9 in late 2014 and/or early 2015. ADEQ plans on developing a QAPP for the meteorological network and submit it for approval to EPA Region 9 in 2014. For special projects, ADEQ does not have any active project plans in-place at this time. 5.2 EPA QA Reports and Network Performance Periodically, EPA publishes reports for some of the criteria pollutant networks, and potentially non-criteria pollutant networks, that rate and/or rank monitoring organizations’ performance over a three year period. The QA Team, as well as other personnel in DM&QA, review these reports to gauge how well our networks are performing with those across the nation. If needed, corrective actions are taken to ensure data of the highest quality possible are collected. ADEQ is monitoring the PM 2.5 network to see how it performs nationally based on the results published in the most recent EPA report, the 3-Year Quality Assurance Report Calendar Years 2005, 2006, and 2007 The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program (February 2009). State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 38 Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations AAAD Air Assessment Ambient Database AAS Air Assessment Section AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality AFL Air Filter Lab AMU Air Monitoring Unit ASARCO American Smelting and Refining Company, LLC ATEC Atmospheric Technologies, Inc. Auto GC/MS Automated Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer AQS Air Quality System (EPA database) BAM Beta Attenuation Monitor Bext Total Light Extinction Bscat Light Scattering CAA Clean Air Act CBSA Core Based Statistical Area CEDES Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO Carbon Monoxide CSN Chemical Speciation Network DCS Data Collection System DM&QA Data Management & Quality Assurance Unit DQO Data Quality Objective E-BAM Environment Proof - Beta Attenuation Monitor EDO Environmental Data Operation EPA Environmental Protection Agency State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 39 ERG Eastern Research Group, Inc. FEM Federal Equivalent Method FMMI Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. FRM Federal Reference Method HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant ICP-MS Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments MCAQD Maricopa County Air Quality Department MET Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) MQO Measurement Quality Objective MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area μg/m3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAREL National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory NATA National Air Toxics Assessment NATTS National Air Toxics Trends Station NCore National Core multipollutant monitoring stations NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NM National Monument NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen oxides NOy Reactive Nitrogen Oxides NPAP National Performance Audit Program NPEP National Performance Evaluation Program NPS National Park Service NWS National Weather Service State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 40 O3 Ozone OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAMS Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Pb Lead PCAQCD Pinal County Air Quality Control District PDEQ Pima County Department of Environmental Quality PE Performance Evaluation PEP Performance Evaluation Program PM Particulate Matter PM 10 Particulate Matter ≤ 10 microns PM coarse Coarse Particulate Matter between 2.5 to 10 micrometers aerodynamic diameter, may also be denoted as PM 10-2.5 PM 2.5 Particulate Matter ≤ 2.5 microns POC Parameter Occurrence Code ppb Parts Per Billion ppm Parts Per Million PQAO Primary Quality Assurance Organization PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration PWEI Populated Weighted Emissions Index QA Quality Assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Program Plan QC Quality Control QMP Quality Management Plan RASS Radar Acoustic Sounding System SEMARNAT Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources SIP State Implementation Plan State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 41 SLAMS State and Local Air Monitoring Stations SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPM Special Purpose Monitor SRO Southern Regional Office STN Speciation Trends Network TAD Technical Assistance Document TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance TSA Technical System Audit USFS United States Forest Service VOC Volatile Organic Compound State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 42 Appendix B – Network Maps There are ten maps in this section illustrating the location of ADEQ and Source monitors: • CO Network • NO 2 Network • O 3 Network • SO 2 Network • Pb Network • PM 10 Network • PM 2.5 Network • Meteorological Network • Urban Visibility Network • IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 43 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 44 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 45 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 46 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 47 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 48 t State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 49 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 50 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 51 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 52 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 53 Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors). Only those monitors that are in operation at the time that this network plan was created are included in this appendix. Monitors that are proposed to be installed or those that were discontinued prior to the creation of this network plan are not included in this appendix. Since individual pollutants or networks have specific monitoring or siting criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout a program or network. See Appendix D for detailed information on specific monitoring sites. NON-REGULATORY NETWORKS Meteorology Temp/RH ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 Wind ............................................................................................................................................................ 59 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM)....................................................................................................................... 61 NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO ............................................................................................................................................................... 62 NO 2 ............................................................................................................................................................. 63 O 3 ................................................................................................................................................................ 64 SO 2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 65 Pb ................................................................................................................................................................. 66 PM 10 ............................................................................................................................................................ 67 PM 2.5 ............................................................................................................................................................ 69 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) ................................................................................................................ 70 National Core Multi-Pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore) ............................................................................ 71 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ................................................................................ 73 AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ...................................................................................................... 76 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP) ............................................................................................ 77 VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera......................................................................................................................................................... 78 Nephelometer .............................................................................................................................................. 79 Transmissometer ......................................................................................................................................... 80 Temp/RH ..................................................................................................................................................... 81 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ......................................................... 82 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 54 Definitions for Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DDMM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site and the POC is the Primary Occurrence Code for the instrument, as it is in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD The AQS code representing a specific pollutant being measured or monitored Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site (Public Information, NAAQS Comparison, or Research) A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (Extreme Downwind, Highest Concentration, Max Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure, Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other) The associated monitoring network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS, Special Purpose, Supplemental Speciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Monitor, Unofficial PAMS) The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the network The AQS code representing the particular method for collecting samples of the specified instrument Denotes if the instrument is a Federal Reference Method, Federal Equivalency Method, Approved Regional Method (for continuous PM 2.5 only), or other according to the Federal Registry Name of agency collecting data Name of laboratory performing sample analysis Name of agency reporting the data Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Date that the monitor was started at the site Frequency the instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6, etc.) Theoretical frequency for particular matter instrument based on Ratio to Standard Figure in 40CFR Part 58.12 (e.g. hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6) Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout a given year (expressed as a range of months) Distance the probe is from the ground in meters (O 3 and SO 2 probes must be between 2 and 15 meters; others pollutants must be between 2 to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters) For rooftop probe(s) only. The separation distance is in reference to walls, parapets, or penthouses located on roof Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction not on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest tree in meters (must be a State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 55 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) Tree Height above Probe (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Restricted airflow (degrees) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb minimum of 10 meters from drip line) Height the obstruction is above the inlet (distance from the obstruction to the inlet must be at least 2x the height that the obstacle protrudes above the inlet). Trees can be considered obstructions depending on density of foliage, therefore the same obstruction requirements apply to trees Height the tree is above the inlet. Trees that are within 10 meters of inlet may not cause issue if the tree height is at or below the inlet height. Furthermore, as trees grow they may become obstructions, therefore it is important to capture the height of trees Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest furnace or incinerator flue in meters (for Pb and SO 2 ; designed to avoid undue influences from minor sources) Distance between the centers of collocated instruments in meters (must be between 1 and 4 meters) Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is free from obstructions (minimum of 180°) Direction the airflow is restricted in degrees as they are associated with the cardinal directions (i.e. 90º = E) (must not be in the direction of the prevailing winds) Direction the wind predominately comes from in degrees during the season of greatest pollutant concentration. Used to determine if restricted airflow is in the direction of the prevailing wind. Type of material probe is made of (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 must have FEP Teflon or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VOCs must be borosilicate glass or stainless steel) Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds) Are there any planned changes to the monitoring in the next 18 months? (Y or N) Are the data being compared against the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS standards? (Y or N) Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for manual particulate matter and lead instruments (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for automated particulate matter instrument (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which zero/span/precision checks occur for gaseous instruments (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Date the last Performance Evaluation audit was performed on the gaseous instrument. (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 , CO, etc.) (MM/DD/YYYY) Dates of the last two audits on the particulate matter and lead instruments flow rate. (MM/DD/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 56 [Monitor] Network (e.g. PM10 Network) Local Site Name Pollutant, POC Parameter code Basic monitoring objective(s) Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (i.e. weight lab, toxics lab, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (e.g. micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (e.g. 1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (e.g. 1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) Tree Height above Probe (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Restricted airflow (degrees) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases (e.g. Pyrex, Stainless Steel, Teflon) Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Will there be changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Is it sutable for comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification for manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification for automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters (MM/DD/YYYY) Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb monitors (MM/DD/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY) not checked with site inspection form checked with site inspection form need to verify with Theresa need info checked with references does not match references need to check CFR If it changes to this format need to change all the tables. Appendix C (1) Monitors by Programs-Networks-Parameters NonRegualatory MET SPM SLAMS NAAQS SPM Temp/RH Wind E-BAM PM2.5 Non-FRM / FEM Monitors NO2 O3 SO2 Pb PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 Ncore Trace CO NOy O3 Trace SO2 PM10-2.5 PM2.5 PAMS O3 NOy NOx Carbonyls VOC Delta Temp Total Horizontal… Ultra Violet… Wind Profiler STN PM2.5 Speciated AIR TOXICS Carbonyls Hex. Chrome SVOC VOC PAH PM10 Metals Carbonyls VOC NATTS UATMP VISIBILITY Camera Nephelometer Transmissometer Transmitter Urban Haze Transmissometer Receiver Temp/RH Wind IMPROVE State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2009, Page 47 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Ajo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Population Exposure Population Exposure Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 02/11/2014 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/16/2012 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/11/2011 Continuous -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 04/15/2011 Continuous Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2.3 2 2 2.1 2 2 5.2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 -- -- 0.5 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 14 13 3.6 12 4 6 5 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- 5.5 -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 270 150 330 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- 250-340 140-350 310-350 -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 57 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 -- -Population Exposure -- -- Downwind Source Oriented -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe -Vaisala HMP 45C Probe -Vaisala HMP 45C Probe -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 040 040 040 040 -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Source Oriented -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 03/30/2010 05/11/1999 03/17/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2 2 2.6 2.4 4.5 2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- 1/0/1900 -- -- 1 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 5 -- -- -- 1 Distance from trees (meters) 9 1 1.2 19 10 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 250 180 290 360 270 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- 90-270 35-105 -- 0-90 Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters --- --- --- --- --- --- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 58 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) Tree Height above Probe (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Restricted airflow (degrees) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb Ajo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Population Exposure Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1969 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---14 ----360 ----N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/06/2012 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---13 ----360 ----N -- Highest Concentration, Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 04/15/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 --------360 ----N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 --------360 ----N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Continuous -01/01-12/31 11.5 --------360 ----N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10.5 --------360 ----N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Continuous -01/01-12/31 12 --------360 ----N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 59 Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind continued Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Middle 01/08/2004 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10.4 ---20 --- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 05/11/1999 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 --30 50 --- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 03/17/2010 Continuous -01/01-12/32 10 6.3 ------ -- -- -- -- -360 ----N -- -360 ----N -- -360 ----N -- -360 ----N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Downwind Source Oriented Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) Tree Height above Probe (meters) -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Middle 12/01/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---35 --- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 05/30/1991 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---2 --- -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Regional 06/23/2003 Continuous -01/01-12/31 9 6.5 ------ Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Restricted airflow (degrees) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -360 ----N -- -270 ----N -- -- Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Source Oriented State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 60 Non-Regulatory - SPM Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Flagstaff Middle School PM2.5 (1) Parameter code -- -- -- -- Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Monitor type(s) Population Exposure Special Purpose Population Exposure Special Purpose Population Exposure Special Purpose Population Exposure Special Purpose Instrument manufacturer and model Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Payson Well Site PM2.5 (1) Prescott College AQD PM2.5 (1) Sedona Fire Station AQD PM2.5 (1) Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Method code -- -- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 09/09/1999 05/16/2012 07/13/2011 12/16/2011 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 3.6 Probe height (meters) 6 2 6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 15 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 6 -- 3 Distance from trees (meters) 15 4 -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- 270 90 360 300 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 61 NAAQS - SLAMS - CO Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) CO (1) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model 42101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Ecotech EC9830T Method code 588 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 Distance from trees (meters) 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Glass, Teflon 1.94 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb --Bi-Weekly 02/28/2014 -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 62 NAAQS - SLAMS - NO2 Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) NO2 (1) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model 42602 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS Ecotech EC9841B Method code 074 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FRM Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 Distance from trees (meters) 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Restricted airflow (degrees) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) --360 --Glass, Teflon 1.94 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb --Bi-Weekly 02/27/2014 -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 63 NAAQS - SLAMS - O3 Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Alamo Lake O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Regional Transport SLAMS Flagstaff Middle School O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS JLG Supersite O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Prescott College AQD O3 (1) O3 (1) Tonto National Monument O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration 44201 NAAQS Comparison 44201 NAAQS Comparison Downwind Downwind SLAMS SLAMS, PAMS SLAMS Queen Valley Yuma Supersite O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Method code 087 087 087 087 087 087 087 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/20/2005 03/13/2008 07/01/1993 03/25/2008 01/01/1998 05/22/2002 05/06/2008 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 5.5 10 4.1 6 4.5 5 4.3 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2 1.2 1.5 2 2 1.6 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- 10 17 -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 12 15 10 -- -- 6 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 3.4 -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 3.4 -- -- 0 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Teflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon 2.91 8.66 1.94 3.87 3.56 3.53 2.98 N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly 08/20/2013 06/19/2013 03/21/2014 06/04/2013 08/21/2013 07/24/2013 05/09/2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 64 NAAQS - SLAMS - SO2 Alamo Lake SO2 (1) Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Hayden Old Jail SO2 (1) JLG Supersite SO2 (1) Miami Jones Ranch SO2 (1) Miami Ridgeline SO2 (1) Miami Townsite SO2 (1) 42401 NAAQS Comparison 42401 NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented 42401 42401 42401 NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Background Source Oriented SPM SLAMS NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T 42401 SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Thermo 43C Ecotech EC9850T Method code 592 592 592 592 060 592 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/14/2014 01/01/1975 03/03/2005 02/01/2013 10/05/1995 02/01/2013 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 3.7 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.5 3.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2.1 1.2 1 1.1 1 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- 10 -- 10 26.4 Distance from trees (meters) -- 12 10 -- -- 10.9 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 3.4 -- 1.5 14 Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 3.4 -- -- 7 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- 280 -- 3081 1411 2300 Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Teflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon 3.72 4.75 1.94 4.08 4.88 3.96 N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly 02/19/2014 02/04/2014 03/07/2014 08/27/2013 05/15/2013 12/10/2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 65 NAAQS - SLAMS - Pb Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Globe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Pb (1) Pb (2) Pb-PM10 (1) Pb (1) Parameter code 14129 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration, Source Oriented 14129 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration, Source Oriented 85129 NAAQS Comparison 14129 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure Source Oriented SLAMS Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP 191 QA Collocated Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP 191 SLAMS, NCore Thermo Partisol 2000 202 SLAMS Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP 191 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Miami Golf Course FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ PCRWRD PCRWRD ERG PCRWRD ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 10/01/2010 10/01/2010 01/01/2005 10/01/2010 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 2 2 4.7 3 1.1 1.1 2 1.1 Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 65 65 9.1 -- Distance from trees (meters) 3 3 9.1 7 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 23 23 2.8 -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -1 -1 2.8 1 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) 1043 1043 -- 2635 Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 2.7 2.7 -- -- 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11/05/2013, 02/07/2014 11/05/2013, 02/07/2014 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 11/05/2013, 02/26/2014 Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 66 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 Ajo Alamo Lake Bullhead City Douglas Red Cross Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Pollutant (POC) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) Parameter code 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS 81102 NAAQS Comparison 122 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Local Site Name Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Background SLAMS Met One BAM 1020 Source Oriented Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Met One BAM 1020 FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 122 SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/11/1991 10/30/2013 11/05/1997 09/02/1998 01/06/1981 07/01/1993 7/26/2012 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:6 1:6 1:2 1:6 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2.9 4.7 5 3 4.6 4.9 4 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.8 2.1 2 2 2 2.5 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- 10 -- 7 -- Distance from trees (meters) 12 -- 23 11 12 7 6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- 1 -- 2.6 -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- 2.9 0 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -06/04/2013, 12/11/2013 -07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 -08/07/2013, 02/04/2014 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 -07/26/2013, 02/26/2014 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -05/08/2013, 10/22/2013 02/19/2014, - State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 67 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continued Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Rillito Yuma Supersite PM10 (3) PM10 (1) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Method code 122 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 126 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Met One BAM 1020 Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Met One BAM 1020 122 Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ AFL -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 01/06/1991 01/01/1991 01/03/1985 12/01/2009 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous Continous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 1:1 1:1 1:2 1:6 1:6 1:6 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 8 7.3 3 4.75 4.3 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.7 2 2 2.1 2 1.8 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 11 15 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 35 17.4 20 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2 2.7 -- -- 0 -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 0 0 -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 3 3 -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N Y N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- Monthly -- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -08/10/2013, 01/28/2014 -08/10/2013, 01/28/2014 -07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 -- -06/12/2013, 11/26/2013 -05/09/2013, 10/22/2013 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 05/22/2014, - State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 68 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5 Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Yuma Supersite Alamo Lake Douglas Red Cross JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (1) PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (1) PM2.5 (2) PM2.5 (3) 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Background SLAMS Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure SLAMS SLAMS, NCore Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 SLAMS, NCore Thermo Partisol 2000 Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Highest Concentration SLAMS QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020 Regional Transport SLAMS Met One BAM 1020 Method code 170 170 170 143 170 143 143 170 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FRM FEM FRM FRM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 11/15/2013 11/02/2000 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 01/01/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:3 Continuous 1:6 1:6 Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4.8 3 5 4.7 8.3 7.3 7.3 4.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.2 2.5 2.5 2 3 2 2 1.9 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- 12 9 8 -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 10 8 7.6 Distance from trees (meters) -- 11 8 7.6 10 10 10 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 2.5 2.8 1.7 2.7 2.7 -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- 2.5 2.8 0 0 0 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- 3 3, 2 2 -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- 180 180 180 -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -- -- -- Monthly -- Monthly Monthly -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- Monthly -- -- Monthly Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 -05/29/2013, 11/19/2013 -02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 -08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 -08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 -08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 -05/29/2013, 10/22/2013 02/19/2014, - State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 69 NAAQS - CSN Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 Speciation (7) PM2.5 Speciation (7) Multiple Multiple Research Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Met One SuperSASS Various Research Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore URG 3000N Various -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) RTI RTI Reporting Agency RTI RTI Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 1:3 1:3 Collecting Agency Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 4.7 4.9 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 11 12 Distance from trees (meters) 11 12 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.6 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N -- -- Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- -09/18/2013, 11/19/2013 -09/12/2013, 11/19/2013 Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 70 NAAQS - NCore Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite CO (1) NOy (1) Parameter code 42101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS 42600 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) NCore JLG Supersite O3 (1) JLG Supersite SO2 (1) JLG Supersite 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS 42401 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure 85129 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore NCore SLAMS, NCore Pb-PM10 (1) JLG Supersite PM10-2.5 (1) 86101 Research Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech 9843 Teledyne API 400E Ecotech EC9850T Method code 588 591 087 592 Thermo Partisol 2000 202 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- ERG -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 03/03/2005 01/01/2005 11/10/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Continuous Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Met One BAM 1020 185 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 10 4.1 4.1 4.7 4.9 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 7 1.2 1.2 2 2.5 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 -- 10 10 9.1 7.6 Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 10 9.1 7.6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 -- 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.6 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 -- 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon -- -- 1.94 14.39 1.94 1.94 -- -- N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- -- 02/28/2014 02/27/2014 03/21/2014 02/27/2014 -- -- -- -- -02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 71 NAAQS - NCore continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (1) 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 Speciation (7) PM2.5 Speciation (7) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Multiple Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 Research Research -- -- Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Met One SuperSASS Various Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Population Exposure Population Exposure -- -- Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 Method code 170 Thermo Partisol 2000 143 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Met One BAM 1020 Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) URG 3000N Various -- ADEQ AFL RTI RTI -- -- ADEQ ADEQ RTI RTI ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 11.5 5 4.7 4.7 4.9 2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.5 2 2 2 1 7 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8 7.6 11 12 4 -- Distance from trees (meters) 8 7.6 11 12 4 4 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 5.5 -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 5.5 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 150 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb Y Y -- -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -5/13/2013, 11/19/2013 -02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 -11/19/2013, 03/13/2014 -11/19/2013, 03/13/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 72 -- -- -- -- NAAQS - PAMS Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite CO (1) NOx (1) Parameter code 42101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS 42603 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9830T Research Population Exposure PAMS Ecotech EC9841B JLG Supersite O3 (1) 44201 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Carbonyl (30,31) Carbonyl (32) VOC (6) Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Max Precursor Impact QA Collocated Max Precursor Impact PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS Teledyne API 400E ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 126 Method code 588 090 087 202 202 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) -- -- -- ERG ERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ERG ERG Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 NATTS not PAMS 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.7 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 1.2 1.2 2 2 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 10 10 6 6 6 Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 10 6 6 6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel 1.94 1.94 1.94 -- -- -- N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- -- -- 02/28/2014 02/27/2014 03/21/2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 73 NAAQS - PAMS continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite VOC (7) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Parameter code Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Queen Valley O3 (1) Queen Valley Queen Valley NOy (1) VOC (6) 44201 NAAQS Comparison 42600 Multiple Research Research Downwind Downwind Downwind SLAMS, PAMS PAMS -- -- 126 Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 087 PAMS Thermo 42C TL Reactive 574 -- -- -- FEM FEM -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Research QA Collocated PAMS, NATTS ATEC 2200 Teledyne API 400E ATEC 8001 126 Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG -- -- -- -- ERG Reporting Agency ERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 NATTS not PAMS Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 06/01 - 08/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 4.5 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4.7 2 11.5 4.5 5.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 1 7 2 2.6 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 6 4 -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 6 4 4 -- -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 5.5 -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 5.5 -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 150 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- 140-350 -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Stainless Steel -- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Stainless Steel Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- 3.56 13.8 -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- 08/21/2013 08/21/2013 -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 74 NAAQS - PAMS continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Queen Valley Queen Valley Vehicle Emissions Lab Vehicle Emissions Lab Ultraviolet Solar Radiation (1) 63302, 63304 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Temp R/H (1) Wind (1) 62101, 61202 Vehicle Emissions Lab Horizontal Solar Raditation (1) 63301 Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Delta Temp (1) 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 -- -- 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 Research Population Exposure PAMS Research Population Exposure PAMS Research Population Exposure PAMS RM Young 7627 Li-Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR UV 810 011 011 -Population Exposure -Rotronics MP101A Probe 040 Downwind Downwind -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -Vaisala HMP 45C Probe 040 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Neighborhood Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 10 Probe height (meters) 2.6 9 2.5 - 10 5 5 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) .5 6.5 .5 -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 Distance from trees (meters) -- -- 10 10 10 10 50 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 180 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 75 Air Toxics -NATTS Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Carbonyl (6) Carbonyl (7) VOC (6) VOC (7) SVOC (6) Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple JLG Supersite PM10 metals speciation (1) Multiple Research Population Exposure Research Research Population Exposure Research Research Population Exposure Research Population Exposure NATTS Thermo Partisol 2000 QA Collocated QA Collocated PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS NATTS ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 ATEC 2200 Tisch PUF+ 202 202 101 101 118 -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 202 Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Reporting Agency ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 06/06/2001 06/06/2001 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 1:6 Every other month 1:6 Every other month 1:6 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 4.7 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2 2 2 1.1 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 6 6 6 6 4.5 9.1 Distance from trees (meters) 6 6 6 6 4.5 9.1 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.8 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 320 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- 150-190 -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- 250-260 -- Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 76 Air Toxics - UATMP Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code South Phoenix VOC (6) Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Population Exposure UATMP Instrument manufacturer and model ATEC 8001 Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency 101 -ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG Reporting Agency ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 8/5/2001 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 1:12 -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.6 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8.0 Distance from trees (meters) 4.8 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 8.0 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 8.0 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 335 Restricted airflow (degrees) -240-265 Prevailing wind direction (degrees) 250-260 Probe material for reactive gases Stainless Steel Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- ----- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 77 Visibility - Urban Haze - Camera Visibility (1) Banner Mesa Medical Center Visibility (1) Estrella Mountain Community College Visibility (1) North Mountain Summit Visibility (1) North Mountain Summit Visibility (2) -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ Building Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Population Population Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure Exposure Exposure -----CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel T2i T2i T2i T2i T2i ------- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2002 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 78 Visibility - Urban Haze - Nephelometer Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Dysart Estrella Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Parameter code -- -- -- Public Information Population Exposure Public Information Population Exposure Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Method code -- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 06/25/2003 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 5 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- 5 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 79 Visibility - Urban Haze - Transmissometer Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Bext (1) Bext (1) -- -- Monitor type(s) Public Information Population Exposure -- Public Information Population Exposure -- Instrument manufacturer and model Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Receiver Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Method code -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/1992 12/01/1992 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 30 27 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 5 -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- 240 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 80 Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RH Dysart Estrella Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Parameter code 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/16/2003 02/11/2003 01/01/1994 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 32 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- 10 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- 5 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Y Y Y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 81 Visibility - IMPROVE Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp Greer Water Treatment Plant Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Meadview IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Background Other Background Other Other Other Other Background IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS ADEQ NPS NFS UC Davis ADEQ ADEQ NFS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/02/1988 06/02/2004 09/24/1997 02/29/2000 04/02/2000 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 09/04/1991 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 4.5 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4 3 -- 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- 1.5 1 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 8 -- -- 5 10 10 -- Distance from trees (meters) 10 6 -- 50 23 10 10 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --4 --4 ---- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 -- 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/28/2014 -- 08/28/2013 10/23/2013 12/02/2013 12/02/2013 06/05/2013 Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 82 Visibility - IMPROVE - continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Organ Pipe National Monument Petrified Forest National Park Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Queen Valley IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Saguaro National Saguaro National Sycamore Canyon Park East Park West Tonto National Monument IMPROVE Other Background Other Other Background Other Background Background IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS NPS NFS ADEQ NPS NPS ADEQ / UC Davis NPS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/15/2003 03/02/1988 02/10/2000 04/30/2001 06/04/1988 04/19/2001 09/11/1991 04/23/1988 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 3.4 4 5 5.2 -- 4 4 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.4 -- 1.5 2.2 -- 1.5 1.5 1.5 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 13 -- 20 -- -- 15 15 8 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 -- 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 05/08/2013 -- 03/07/2013 01/22/2014 -- 07/10/2013 09/11/2013 06/11/2013 Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 83 Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All current sites and those closed after July 1, 2014 are included in this appendix. Sites that were closed after July 1, 2014 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section. This appendix also contains general information about the air quality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for more detailed information on specific monitors and networks. AQS ID ADEQ ID 04-019-0001 04-012-8000 04-015-1003 04-003-8001 04-003-1005 04-013-4010 04-013-8005 04-005-1008 04-007-1002 04-005-8102 04-001-8001 04-007-1001 04-025-8104 04-013-9997 04-015-9000 04-007-8000 04-007-0011 04-007-0009 04-007-0012 04-023-0004 04-019-0005 04-003-0011 04-007-0008 04-001-0012 04-007-8100 04-025-8033 04-021-8001 04-019-0020 04-019-0021 04-019-9000 04-013-4003 04-005-8103 04-007-0010 04-013-9998 04-027-8011 21737 16316 34961 19489 16365 16679 16503 19550 16506 21736 16707 16593 16682 16323 16326 16421 16328 21298 16629 16631 16382 16632 16511 16480 16681 16391 16317 16473 16829 16330 16446 133011 16394 16499 16474 16475 142818 16377 16476 16447 16363 11319 SITE NAME PAGE ADEQ Building Ajo Alamo Lake Banner Mesa Medical Center Bullhead City Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Dysart Estrella Estrella Mountain Community College Flagstaff Middle School Globe Highway Grand Canyon National Park – Hance Camp Greer Water Treatment Plant Hayden Old Jail Ike’s Backbone JLG Supersite Meadview Miami Golf Course Miami Jones Ranch Miami Ridgeline Miami Townsite Nogales Post Office North Mountain Summit Organ Pipe National Monument Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Petrified Forest National Park Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Prescott College AQD Queen Valley Rillito Saguaro National Park East Saguaro National Park West Sedona Fire Station AQD South Phoenix Sycamore Canyon Tonto National Monument Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 134 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 84 Definitions for Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Local Site Name Site Narrative Site Information AQS ID ADEQ ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to Roadway Traffic Count of Nearest Major Roadway Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Site Established Date Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Brief summary of the site location and surroundings Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database Unique identifier from the AZURITE / AAAD database for each monitoring site Physical Street Address or cross streets of the monitoring site Arizona county the monitor is located within Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Description of area around monitoring site (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, desert, forest, mobile, blighted area, and military reservation) Distance and direction from the edge of the nearest roadway to the instrument in meters ADOT supplied traffic count for the nearest major roadway. Includes distance and direction of roadway if differs from the nearest roadway. Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement, rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.) The North/South geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The East/West geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The vertical distance above sea level of the site in meters Date site was first used as a monitoring site Monitoring Information Pollutant The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site Basic monitoring Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site (Public Information, objective NAAQS Comparison, or Research.) Site type(s) A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (Extreme Downwind, Highest Concentration, Max Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure, Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other) Monitor type(s) The associated monitoring network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Special Purpose, Supplemental Speciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Monitor, Unofficial PAMS) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Monitor Start Date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site Instrument The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the manufacture and network State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 85 model Site Photos Aerial View Site View Image of site and the surrounding area (using Google Earth) Most current photo of monitors at the site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 86 ADEQ Building The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of the building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None ADEQ ID 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 84 m – S – Washington St. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 21737 Rooftop 33.4483 -112.0878 329 m 07/01/2002 Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 07/01/2002 Site Photos Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 87 Ajo The site is located at the Pima County Maintenance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest structure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lie the stabilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo mining operation that closed in 1985. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID Street Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to roadway 109 m – E – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Elevation Traffic count of Nearest Major 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16316 Gravel 32.3820 -112.8575 515 m 07/01/1969 Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind Temp/RH NAAQS --Comparison Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure SLAMS --Thermo RM Young Vaisala HMP TEOM 5305 155 Probe 1400AB Anemometer Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 02/11/1991 07/01/1969 02/11/2014 Site Photos Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 0/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 88 Alamo Lake The site was established to replace the Hillside site and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49 km north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter. More monitors will be added at this site over the next year as it becomes a designated background site. Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID Street Address Alamo Lake State Park County La Paz Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to roadway 80 m – NE – Alamo Rd. Elevation Traffic count of Nearest Major 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information O3 SO 2 PM 10 NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Comparison Regional General / General / Transport Background Background SLAMS SPM SLAMS Teledyne API Ecotech Met One BAM 400E EC9850T 1020 Regional Regional Regional 05/20/2005 01/14/2014 10/30/2013 34961 Gravel 34.2439 -113.5586 403 m 05/20/2005 PM 2.5 NAAQS Comparison General / Background SLAMS Met One BAM 1020 Regional 11/05/2013 Site Photos Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with PM inlets – 12/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 89 Banner Mesa Medical Center The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201 Maricopa Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Residential 170 m – N – W Brown St. Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 32,760 – Country Club Dr. – 260m – E ADEQ ID 19489 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Rooftop 33.4335 -111.8428 454 m Site Established Date 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 01/01/1993 Site Photos Banner Mesa Medical Center Camera– 05/2013 Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 90 Bullhead City The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429 Mohave Groundcover Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 30 m – W – SR 95 Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 25,500 – SR 95 Site Established Date 16365 Rooftop 35.1539 -114.5661 156 m 11/01/1997 Monitoring Information PM 10 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB Neighborhood 11/05/1997 Site Photos Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office– 06/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 91 Chiricahua Entrance Station The site is operated by the NPS. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3.8 km to the northeast. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Site Information 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Desert Longitude 99 m – E – Bonita Canyon Elevation Rd. Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date 16679 Dirt/Rocks 32.0094 -109.3891 1,570 m 01/01/1988 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 92 Douglas Red Cross The site is located at the Red Cross building on the south side of 15th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS database, a second AQS ID was created (04-003-9000) for IMPROVE data. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-003-1005 1445 E. 15th St. Douglas, AZ 85607 Cochise Sierra Vista-Douglas Commercial/Residential 30 m – N – 14th St. Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 2,474 – 14th St. ADEQ ID 16503 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Dirt/Grass 31.3492 -109.5396 1,231 m Site Established Date 09/01/1998 Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Met One BAM Vaisala HMP TEOM 1020 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 08/16/2012 Wind -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 08/06/2012 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 06/02/2004 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 93 Site Photos Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 04/2013 Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 94 Dysart The site is located in the Maricopa County Facility Maintenance Yard at the southeast corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 14 m – W – Dysart Rd Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 51,673 – Bell Rd. – 150m – N Site Established Date 19550 Gravel 33.6370 -112.3393 357 m 01/01/2003 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Vaisala Optec NGN 2 HMP155 Nephelometer Probe Urban Urban 01/01/2003 07/16/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 03/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 95 Estrella The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estrella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Site Information 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Desert/Recreation Area Longitude 258 m – N – W. Vineyard Elevation Ave. Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date 16506 Grass/Gravel 33.3833 -112.3728 277 m 01/01/1995 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Vaisala Optec NGN 2 HMP155 Nephelometer Probe Urban Urban 01/01/2003 02/11/2003 Site Photos Estrella Nephelometer tower – 06/2012 Aerial view of Estrella State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 96 Estrella Mountain Community College One high-resolution digital camera points to the Estrella Mountains, which lies 11 km to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None ADEQ ID 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 155 m – S – Thomas Rd. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 9,798 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 21736 Rooftop 33.4836 -112.3503 305 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 01/01/1993 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 97 Flagstaff Middle School The site is west of Bonito Road on the rooftop of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east. At the end of 2013 the O 3 , and the PM 10 , and PM 2.5 Partisols, will be removed from this site. Only the PM 2.5 E-BAM unit will remain at the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Site Information 04-005-1008 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Coconino Flagstaff Residential 80 m – E – N. Bonito St. 3,200 – N. Bonito St. ADEQ ID 16707 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Rooftop 35.2061 -111.6528 2,120 m Site Established Date 10/29/1996 Monitoring Information O3 PM 2.5 NAAQS Public Comparison Information Max O 3 Population Concentration Exposure SLAMS Special Purpose Teledyne API 400E Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 03/13/2008 Neighborhood 09/09/1999 Site Photos O 3 sample cane at Flagstaff – 11/2012 Aerial view of Flagstaff Middle School State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 98 Globe Highway This site is the location of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ. ASARCO mine also maintains a SO 2 analyzer, Pb sampler, PM sampler, wind monitor, rain gage, and temp/RH at the site. The site is located on the southwest end of a small canyon and may be influenced by both broad and local meteorological conditions. The Site is located approximately 1 km to the east/southeast of the ASARCO smelting facility. Surrounding trees are below inlet height and have no vegetation. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292 Gila Payson Desert/Residential 10 m – W – SR 77 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 2,700 – SR 77 ADEQ ID Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Site Established Date Monitoring Information Pb Pb Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Highest Highest Highest Concentration, Concentration, Concentration, Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS QA Collocated -Tisch TE8550-BL TSP Tisch TE8550-BL TSP Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 10/01/2010 Neighborhood 10/01/2010 Neighborhood 04/15/2011 16593 Gravel 33.002 -110.765 602 m 01/01/1975 Wind -Highest Concentration, Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 04/15/2011 Site Photos Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 07/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 99 Aerial view of Globe Highway Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Desert Longitude 200 m – E – SR64 Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date 16682 Dirt 35.9731 -111.9841 2,235 m 09/24/1997 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/24/1997 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 100 Greer Water Treatment Plant The site is located in the Apache National Forest and is operated the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4 km to the south/southwest. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-001-8001 SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927 Apache None Forest 1,600 m – N – SR 373 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 1,044 – SR 373 ADEQ ID 16323 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Grass 34.0583 -109.4400 2,503 m Site Established Date 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 02/29/2000 Site Photos Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 101 Hayden Old Jail The site is located in a shelter next to the old Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved to a shelter next to the jail due to safety and siting concerns. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the ASARCO smelting facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site. Site Information 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 10 m – E – Canyon Dr. Elevation Shelter 33.0062 -110.7864 625 m Site Established Date 01/01/1969 AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of 1,790 – Velasco Ave. – 242m Nearest Major –E Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information SO 2 PM 10 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Ecotech Vaisala HMP TEOM EC9850T 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 16326 Wind -Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail shelter, PM inlet and meteorological tower – 05/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 102 Ike’s Backbone The site is operated by the USFS. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas. The site is located on a small ridge with the Verde River and mountains nearby. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544 Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Forest Longitude -111.6825 1000m – N – Childs Rd Elevation 1,303 m Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. – 6500m – NE Site Established Date 04/02/2000 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/02/2000 Site Photos IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone – 2011 Regional view of Ike’s Backbone State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 103 JLG Supersite The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily residential neighborhoods, with I-17 approximately 1.6 km to the west. This is also an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID th Street Address 4530 N. 17 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to roadway 10 m – E – 17th Ave. Elevation 1,557 – Campbell Ave. – Traffic count of 158m – S Nearest Major Site Established Date 17,639 – N 19th Ave. – Roadway 367m – W Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information CO NO 2 / NOx NOy NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison. Comparison Comparison Research Highest Highest Concentration, Population Concentration Population Exposure Exposure SLAMS, SLAMS, NCore NCore, PAMS PAMS Ecotech Ecotech Ecotech 9843 EC9830T EC9841B Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 16328 Gravel 33.5038 -112.0957 354 m 07/01/1993 O3 NAAQS Comparison Max O 3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Teledyne API 400E Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Monitoring Information SO 2 Carbonyl VOC SVOC NAAQS Research Research Research Comparison Population Population Population Exposure, Max Exposure, Max Population Exposure Precursor Precursor Exposure Impact Impact Monitor type(s) SLAMS, PAMS, PAMS, NATTS NCore NATTS NATTS Instrument Ecotech Tisch TEATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 manufacture and model EC9850T 1000BL Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/03/2005 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 07/08/2007 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 104 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information Pb-PM 10 / PM 10 metals PM 10 PM 10-2.5 speciation NAAQS NAAQS Research Comparison, Comparison Research Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure SLAMS, NCore, SLAMS NCore NATTS Thermo Met One BAM Met One BAM Partisol 2000 1020 1020 Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/2005 07/01/1993 11/10/2010 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Speciation Speciation NAAQS Research Research Comparison Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure Supplemental Supplemental SLAMS, Speciation, Speciation, NCore NCore NCore Thermo Met One URG 3000N Partisol 2000 SuperSASS Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 Monitoring Information Wind IMPROVE -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 07/01/1993 PM 2.5 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Met One BAM 1020 Neighborhood 07/01/2003 Temp/RH -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 07/01/1993 IMPROVE Research Research Other Other IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- Neighborhood 04/25/2001 Neighborhood 04/25/2001 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 105 Site Photos Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite two shelters, roof top, and meteorological tower – 08/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 106 Meadview The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the north end of Meadview, AZ, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingman. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444 Mohave Groundcover Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Desert/Residential Longitude 100 m – E – Pierce Ferry Rd Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date 21298 Gravel 36.0193 -114.0684 902 m 09/04/1991 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/04/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview shelter – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 107 Miami Golf Course This site is the location of the TSP-Pb monitor in Miami, AZ. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc also maintained two particulate matter monitors at the site but were removed as of January 2014. The site is located near the Cobre Valley Country Club with residential areas to the south and east and the Freeport McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest. Surrounding trees are below inlet height and have no vegetation. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-8000 SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Payson Residential 220 – SE – SR 188 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 3,300 – SR 188 ADEQ ID 16629 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Gravel 33.4190 -110.8296 1000 m Site Established Date 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information Pb PM 10 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Tisch TEVaisala HMP TEOM 8550-BL TSP 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 10/01/2010 7/26/2012 06/08/2011 Wind -Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 05/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 108 Miami Jones Ranch This site is one of three SO 2 sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc operate a SO 2 instrument at this site as well. The site is located south of the town of Miami and is over 3 km south/southwest of the smelter. The site located in the desert hills over looking the town and is off a gravel/dirt road. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-0011 Cherry Flats Rd. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Payson Residential 15m – SE – Cherry Flats Rd. Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date n/a ADEQ ID 16631 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Gravel 33.3853 -110.8673 1,242 m Site Established Date 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information SO 2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Neighborhood 02/01/2013 Site Photos Fenced Miami Jones Ranch site – 03/2013 Aerial view of Miami Jones Ranch State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 109 Miami Ridgeline This is one of three SO 2 site in the Miami area. The site is located inside on private property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ridge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintain a PM 10 monitor at the site. The Freeport McMoRan smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-0009 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Payson Residential 40 m – N – Linden St. Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 510 – Loomis Ave. – 230m – W ADEQ ID 16382 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Dirt 33.3992 -110.8589 1,085 m Site Established Date 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information SO 2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo 43C Neighborhood 10/05/1995 Site Photos Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 05/2012 Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 110 Miami Townsite This site is one of three SO 2 sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc run a SO 2 instrument at this site as well. This site is located on the western side of Miami, near the center of the town. There is a church to the west and a Police Station to the west with residential to the north and south. The road is located to the south of the site. The smelter is over 2 km to the northwest of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-0012 ADEQ ID Sullivan ST & Davis Canyon Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 16.5 m – SE – Sullivan St. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 470 – Sullivan St. Site Established Date 16382 Gravel 33.3973 -110.8744 1,042 m 0/01/1997 Monitoring Information SO 2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Neighborhood 02/01/2013 Site Photos Fenced Miami Townsite – 05/2013 Aerial view of Miami Townsite State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 111 Nogales Post Office The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Border. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. This site is used to meet the PM 2.5 collocation requirement. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621 Santa Cruz Groundcover Nogales Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 37.6 m – NW – Morley Ave. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 10 PM 2.5 NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Comparison Population Population Highest Exposure Exposure Concentration SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS Met One BAM Thermo Met One BAM 1020 Partisol 2000 1020 Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 16511 Rooftop 31.3372 -110.9367 1,176 m 01/01/1980 PM 2.5 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 Neighborhood 04/01/1999 Monitoring Information Temp/RH Wind -- -- Population Exposure -- Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 08/11/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 112 Site Photos Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteorological monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 113 North Mountain Summit The site is located on a mountaintop in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera faces South Mountain, which lies 27 km to the south. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with some commercial activity to the south and east. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None ADEQ ID 16480 West side of 7th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722 850 m – E – 7th St. Elevation 625 m Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 28,210 – 7th St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Visibility Public Public Information Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --CANON EOS CANON EOS Rebel T2i Rebel T2i Urban Urban 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 Site Photos Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 04/2013 Aerial view of North Mountain Summit State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 114 Organ Pipe National Monument The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1 km south/southwest of the national monument visitor center, which is about 35.4 km south of Why, AZ. The site is about seven meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mountain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Desert Longitude 400 m – E – SR 85 Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date 16681 Gravel 31.9499 -112.8010 505 m 01/01/1971 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 01/15/2003 Site Photos Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 04/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 115 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. In 2011 the meteorological instruments were re-located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site was closed. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, the surrounding area is predominately desert. The Chemical Lime Plant is not operational at this time. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Desert Longitude 107 m – S – Paul Spur Rd. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 4,920 – SR 80 – 230m – N Site Established Date 16391 Dirt 31.3658 -109.7309 1,278 m 01/01/1985 Monitoring Information PM 10 Temp/RH Wind NAAQS --Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS --Thermo RM Young Vaisala HMP TEOM 5305 155 Probe 1400AB Anemometer Middle Middle Middle 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP – 03/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 116 Payson Well Site The site is located in the southern area of Payson, in a field at a well water site. To the south of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use and 200 meters to the south east is SR 87. Site was moved 90m NE on the same parcel to meet siting requirements. The Thermo Partisol 2000 will be replaced with a continuous Met One BAM 1020 starting July 1, 2014. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID Street Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to roadway 134 m – S – Aero Dr. Elevation Traffic count of Nearest Major 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM2.5 NAAQS Public Comparison Information Population Population Exposure Exposure SLAMS Special Purpose Met One BAM 1020 Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 01/01/1991 Neighborhood 05/16/2012 16317 Gravel 34.2297 -111.3295 1,501 m 01/01/1991 Temp/RH Wind -- -- Population Exposure -- Population Exposure -RM Young Vaisala HMP 5103 45C Probe Anemometer Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/30/1991 05/30/1991 Site Photos Payson Well Site continuous particulate monitor probe and shelter – 5/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 117 Aerial view of Payson Well Site Petrified Forest National Park The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1.6 km north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surrounding area is desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Street Address I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ County Apache Groundcover Dirt CBSA None Latitude 35.0770 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690 Distance to roadway 1,050 m – SW – I-40 Elevation 1,766 m Traffic count of Nearest Major 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988 Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 118 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holiday Inn Hotel near 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID nd Street Address 3600 N. 2 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to roadway 25 m – E – Central Ave. Elevation Traffic count of Nearest Major 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16829 Rooftop 33.4901 -112.0767 337 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Optec LVP-2 Vaisala Transmissometer HMP155 Receiver Probe Urban Urban 12/01/1992 01/01/1994 Site Photos Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 12/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 119 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn Hotel 4.5 km to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. A new LED bulb was installed in May 2014. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 120 m – S – Beth. Home Rd. Elevation Rooftop 33.5253 -112.1019 340 m 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. 12/01/1992 Site Established Date 16330 Monitoring Information Bext Public Information Population Exposure -Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Urban 12/01/1992 Site Photos Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Pathway – 2005 Transmitter State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 120 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station The site is operated by USFS. The site is located on a hilltop south of Young, AZ, within the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest. The surrounding area is a transitional zone between desert and forest. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Desert/Forest Longitude 250 m – N – SR288 Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date 16446 Dirt 34.0908 -110.9419 1,587 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 02/10/2000 Site Photos Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 09/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 121 Prescott College AQD The site was relocated at Prescott College from the Mogollon Building to the Penstemon Building due to Mogollon Building’s renovation and to meet siting requirements. The surrounding area is residential and commercial, with a high traffic street approximately 45 meters to the east. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-025-8033 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Yavapai Prescott Residential/Commercial 45m – E – Grove Ave. Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 13,300 – Grove Ave. ADEQ ID 133011 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Rooftop 34.5467 -112.4761 1,591 m Site Established Date 12/05/2006 Monitoring Information O3 PM 2.5 NAAQS Public Comparison Information Max O 3 Population Concentration Exposure Special SLAMS Purpose Met One Teledyne 400e E-BAM Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/25/2008 07/13/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott College AQD New Location of Prescott College AQD – 10/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 122 Queen Valley The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small town of Queen Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primarily desert. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219 Pinal Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Desert Longitude 87 m – E – Queen Anne Dr. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date Monitoring Information O3 NOy NAAQS Research Comparison Downwind Downwind SLAMS, PAMS PAMS Teledyne API Thermo 42C 400E TL Reactive Regional Regional 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 16394 Gravel 33.2938 -111.2857 668 m 01/01/1998 VOC Temp/RH Research -- Downwind Downwind PAMS -- ATEC 8001 Regional 05/20/2001 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Regional 06/23/2003 Monitoring Information Wind IMPROVE -- Research Downwind -RM Young 5103 Anemometer Regional 06/23/2003 Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/30/2001 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 123 Site Photos Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter and meteorological tower at Queen Valley site – 02/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 124 Rillito In February of 2007 the site was moved from the Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping station. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 260 meters to the northeast. The site is located within the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximately 500 meters to the north/northwest of the Cal Portland Rillito Cement Plant. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Residential Longitude 10 m – S – Robinson St. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. – 240m – NE Site Established Date 16499 Dirt 32.4143 -111.1545 626 m 01/01/1985 Monitoring Information PM 10 Temp/RH Wind NAAQS --Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS --Thermo RM Young Vaisala HMP TEOM 5103 45C Probe 1400AB Anemometer Middle Middle Middle 01/03/1985 03/30/2010 01/08/2004 Site Photos Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 125 Saguaro National Park East The site is located within the Saguaro National Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Residential/Desert Longitude 82 m – W – Old Spanish Tr. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 6,198 – Old Spanish Trail Site Established Date 16474 Dirt 32.1740 -110.7360 938 m 06/04/1988 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 06/04/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 126 Saguaro National Park West The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by the NPS. The area surrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 km southwest of I-10. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Desert Longitude 27 m – W – Mile Wide Rd. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date 16475 Gravel 32.2485 -111.2175 718 m 12/29/1996 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/19/2001 Site Photos Shelters at Saguaro NP West site – 07/2012 Regional view of Saguaro NP West State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 127 Sedona Fire Station AQD In 2011, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was moved from the Sedona Post Office site to the Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emissions affecting the monitor. The Sedona Fire Station site is located approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona Post Office site. The surrounding area is composed of residential and commercial use. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information None 310 Forest Rd, Sedona, AZ 86336 Coconino Flagstaff Commercial/Residential 50m – N – Forest Rd 5,689 – SR89A – 150m – E n/a ADEQ ID 142818 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Rooftop 34.8683 -111.7633 1,326 m Site Established Date 12/16/2011 Monitoring Information Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date PM 2.5 Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 12/16/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Sedona Fire Station E-BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station – 3/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 128 South Phoenix The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are located north and west of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 83 m – N – Tamarisk St. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 19,110 – Central Ave. – 165m – E Site Established Date 16377 Asphalt 33.4030 -112.0750 330 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information VOC Research Population Exposure UATMP ATEC 8001 Neighborhood 8/5/2001 Site Photos Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 129 Sycamore Canyon The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area surrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Site Information 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond) Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Forest Longitude 33 m – NW – Boy Scout Elevation Camp Rd Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 15,048 – I-40 – 12km – N Site Established Date 16476 Dirt/Grass 35.1406 -111.9692 2,046 m 09/11/1991 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/11/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 130 Tonto National Monument The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National Forest at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roosevelt Lake about 1 km to the north. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Desert Longitude 17 m – NE – SR 188 Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 800 – SR 188 Site Established Date 16447 Dirt/Rock 33.6547 -111.1074 786 m 04/23/1988 Monitoring Information O3 IMPROVE NAAQS Research Comparison Downwind Background SLAMS IMPROVE Teledyne API -400E Regional Regional 05/22/2002 04/23/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 08/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 131 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both residential and commercial, with an open field directly to the northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202). AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-013-9998 600 N. 40th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 Maricopa Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Residential/Commercial 66 m – E – 40th St. 10,740 – 40th St. ADEQ ID 16363 Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Gravel 33.4553 -111.9961 356 m Site Established Date 04/01/1987 Monitoring Information Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Urban 06/25/2003 Delta Temp Horizontal Solar Raditation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Research Research Research Population Exposure PAMS RM Young 7627 Neighborhood 08/20/2004 Population Exposure PAMS Population Exposure PAMS Epply TUVR UV Neighborhood 08/20/2004 Li-Cor 200S2 Neighborhood 06/18/1999 Monitoring Information Temp R/H Wind -- -- Population Exposure -Rotronics MP101A Probe Neighborhood 05/11/1999 Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP155 Probe Neighborhood 05/11/1999 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 132 Site Photos Aerial view of Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 12/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 133 Yuma Supersite The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air quality monitors in the Yuma area to one site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility property. The surrounding area is commercial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 km to the northeast. In addition to NAAQS compliance, the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count of Nearest Major Roadway Site Information 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364 Yuma Groundcover Yuma Latitude Commercial/Industrial Longitude 91 m – W – Arizona Ave. Elevation Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date Monitoring Information O3 PM 10 PM 2.5 NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Comparison Max O 3 Population Regional Concentration Exposure Transport SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Thermo Teledyne API Met One BAM TEOM 400E 1020 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 113219 Gravel 32.6903 -114.6144 60 m 02/01/2006 Temp/RH -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 03/17/2010 Monitoring Information Wind -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 03/17/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 134 Site Photos Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Meteorological Tower at Yuma Supersite – 4/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 135 Appendix E – Criteria Pollutant Minimum Monitoring Requirements This appendix contains tables that summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO). Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not included within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 136 O3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Table D-2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O3. 2011-2013 # of Required # of Active 8-hr Design Design Value Site Monitors Monitors Value (ppb) Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 69 Flagstaff Middle School 1 1 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 69 Prescott College AQD 1 1 Yuma Yuma 195,751 76 Yuma Supersite 1 1 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A 0 0 Sierra Vista - Douglas Cochise 131,346 N/A N/A 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, and Tonto National Monument. _________________________________________________________________________ MSA County 2010 Census Population # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 0 PM2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 and Table D-5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 2a Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM2.5 SLAMS. (FRM/FEM/ARM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.1 and Table D-5) 2011-2013 2011-2013 # of # of Active Annual Annual Daily Required 2010 Census Daily Design Continuous MSA County Design Design Value Design Continuous Population Value Site Monitors Value Site Value Monitors (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.3 12 0 0 Middle School Middle School Prescott Prescott Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.2 10 0 0 Valley Valley Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 16 1 1 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Kingman Sierra Vista Douglas Red Douglas Red Cochise 131,346 6.7 12 1 1 Douglas Cross Cross Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office. Table 2b Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non-FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.2) 2011-2013 2011-2013 # of # of Active Annual Annual Daily Required 2010 Census Daily Design Continuous MSA County Design Design Value Design Continuous Population Value Site Monitors Value Site Value Monitors (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 12 0 1* Middle School Middle School Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.0 Prescott Valley 9 Prescott Valley 0 1* Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 15 0 1 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Kingman Sierra Vista Cochise 131,346 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Douglas * Continuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMs, or ARMs Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office. _________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 137 # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 0 # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 0 PM10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Table D-4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM10. MSA County 2010 Census 2011-2013 Max Population Concentration [μg/m3] Max Concentration Site # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 61 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 274 Yuma Supersite 1-2 1 0 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 185 Bullhead City 0-1 1 0 Sierra Vista - Douglas Cochise 131,346 251 Douglas Red Cross 0-1 2 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas Red Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Golf Course, Miami Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite. _________________________________________________________________________ NO2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO2. CBSA 2010 Census 2010 Population Max AADT Counts # of Required Near-road Monitors # of Active Near-road Monitors # of Additional Near-road Monitors Needed # of Required Area-wide Monitors # of Active Area-wide Monitors # of Additional Area-wide Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 40,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sierra Vista - Douglas 131,346 32,000 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None _________________________________________________________________________ 0 0 0 SO2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO2. CBSA County 2010 Census Population 2011 Total SO21 [tons/year] Population Weighted Emissions Index2 [million persons-tons per year] 1.34 # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors 0 0 # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 10 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2000 422 0 0 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 12.6 2.40 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman Mohave 200,186 14.44 2.89 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sierra Vista - Douglas Cochise 131,346 3922 515 1 Using NEI data 2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO2 and dividing product by one million Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline. EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None _________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 138 CO (Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for CO. CBSA 2010 Census # of Required Population Near-Road Monitors # of Active Near-Road Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0 Prescott 211,033 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 0 0 0 Sierra Vista - Douglas 131,346 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None _____________________________________________________________________________ Pb (Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore. NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census Population JLG Supersite State-wide Requirement 4,192,887 # of Required Monitors 1 # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 1 0 Table 7b. Minimum Source-Oriented Pb Monitoring above 0.5 Tons Per Year (including airports)1 Source Name Address Pb Emissions Emission Max 3-Month Design Value (tons per Inventory Design Date year) Source & Value* (third month, Data Year [μg/m3 ] year) ADEQ ASARCO LLC -3.87 0.27 June, 2011 2011 Freeport ADEQ McMoRan Copper -4.87 0.06 April, 2011 2011 and Gold Inc. Ernest A. Love -0.89 NEI 2011 --Field Falcon Field -- 0.77 NEI 2011 -- Chandler -0.58 NEI 2011 -Municipal Phoenix Goodyear -0.50 NEI 2011 -Phoenix Deer -1.16 NEI 2011 -Valley2 *consider data from the past 3 years. 1 Monitoring Required on all non-airport sources above 0.5 TPY and on Airports above 1.0 TPY 2 Phoenix Deer Valley is not on the list of Airports to be monitored for Pb Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 139 Appendix F – Letter to EPA This appendix contains one letter to EPA. The letter is ADEQ’s Request for Siting Criteria Waiver at the JLG Supersite. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 140 July 1, 2014 Deborah Jordan, Air Division Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Air-1 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Subject: ADEQ Request for Siting Criteria Waiver JLG Supersite Dear Ms. Jordan: The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is submitting the Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014. There is one site that does not meet the distance from the nearest road or distance from trees requirements as specified in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E. This letter is to request EPA to waive the monitoring site requirements for the JLG Supersite.. Below is information that ADEQ has considered in the determination that this monitoring site is as representative as it would be if the siting criteria were being met. JLG Supersite The JLG Supersite was established in 1993 in a central Phoenix neighborhood. Today, after 21 years, the site remains largely the same. Monitors and inlets are located on the roof of the shelters, while temperature sensitive analyzers and data loggers are inside the air-conditioned shelters. The neighboring houses remain largely the same except for the trees in the yards adjacent to the site. The required distance from trees to probe is >10 meters. There is now a tree drip line within 10 meters on 1 sides of the site shelter. The PM10, PM2.5 (continuous and filter-based), Carbonyl, VOC, SVOC, and Pb inlets are <10 meters from the closest tree drip line. The SO2, O3, NO2, and CO inlets are currently exactly 10 meters from the closet tree drip line. This has the potential to be < 10 meters as the tree grows. The tree is located in the SSE direction from the inlet whereas the prevailing wind direction comes from the SW during the season of highest concentration (summer), therefore the tree has negligible impact on monitoring at the site. ADEQ has found that these monitor probes cannot reasonably be relocated so as to meet the siting criteria because of the physical constraints of the site. Page 2 of 2 The JLG Supersite has monitors for NAAQS (CO, NO 2 , O 3 , SO 2 , Pb, PM 10 , PM 2.5 ), NCore, PAMS, NATTS, Toxics, IMPROVE, and meteorology. The cost of site relocation would be substantial. ADEQ has reviewed several options. Based on the long standing historical trends, the lack of cost benefit for moving the site, the constraints of the site for modification of the probes, the low ADT of the adjacent road, the prevailing wind direction coming from the SW, and that the probes locations are just shy of the required distances for trees, ADEQ is requesting a siting criteria waiver from EPA for the placement of the PM 2.5 continuous PM 2.5 filter-based, and PM 10 continuous, Carbonyl, VOC, SVOC, and Pb instruments located at JLG Supersite regarding the distance from tree line siting criteria listed in 40CFR Part 58 Appendix E. We appreciate the effort by EPA in the review of this waiver request for air monitoring siting. If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Rigney at (602) 771-2274. Sincerely, Eric C. Massey, Director Air Quality Division cc: Meredith Kurpius, USEPA, Region 9 Michael Flagg, USEPA, Region 9 Theresa Rigney, ADEQ Appendix G – Interagency Air Quality Monitoring for Arizona This appendix contains a proposed document between State and local air monitoring agencies in Arizona to outline the responsibilities delineated to each agency. As it stands, this document is not in-place and has not been approved by each State or local agency. Each State or local agency will receive forthcoming guidance from the EPA for this document in the following year after the 2014 Network Plan has been published. This is only intended for informational purposes and is included per the request of EPA Region 9. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 143 Interagency Air Quality Monitoring for the State of Arizona Purpose: 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D(e) states that “Full monitoring requirements apply separately to each affected State or local agency in the absence of an agreement between the affected agencies and the EPA Regional Administrator.” EPA Region 9 indicated in their response to the 2013 Network Plan that an interagency document should be in place to delineate the shared monitoring requirements by overlapping agencies. This document is to fulfill this CFR requirement, to clarify the monitoring requirements being met by each agency, and to support requirements for the monitoring networks in Arizona. The following table outlines Minimum Monitoring Requirements in the State of Arizona as required in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D. This does not take into account the breadth of monitoring that is required by the EPA Regional Administrator for the design of a complete monitoring program. Each State or local agency must work with the EPA Regional Administrator to develop a monitoring program for their area. This document illustrates the minimum monitoring requirements as outlined in Table 1 between all agencies in Arizona. Each agency is responsible for all other monitoring requirements not listed in Table 1 as stated in 40 CFR Part 58 for their area. Each area is defined as a specific Metropolitan Statistical Area or as a State-wide area. Agencies involved: Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 144 Table 1: Minimum Monitoring Requirements in Arizona State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 145