Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS .......................................................................... 6 2.1 NAAQS COMPLIANCE NETWORK .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) AND MAINTENANCE AREA NETWORK ....................................................... 6 2.3 SOURCE ORIENTED NETWORK ................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 NCORE NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.5 METEOROLOGICAL NETWORK ................................................................................................................... 7 2.6 PHOTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT MONITORING STATIONS (PAMS) ................................................................... 7 2.7 NATIONAL AIR TOXICS TREND SITES (NATTS) ............................................................................................. 8 2.8 CHEMICAL SPECIATION NETWORK (CSN) .................................................................................................... 8 2.9 CLASS 1 AREA NETWORK AND IMPROVE PROGRAM ................................................................................... 8 2.10 AIRNOW REPORTING ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.11 URBAN HAZE NETWORK ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.12 E‐BAM NETWORK OF PM2.5 SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS......................................................................... 9 2.13 ARIZONA / MEXICO BORDER NETWORK .................................................................................................. 10 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION ....................................................................................... 11 3.1 SITE CLOSURES..................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 NEW SITES PLANNED ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.3 NETWORK CHANGES – CURRENT AND PLANNED ......................................................................................... 11 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS ................................................................................................. 17 4.1 PM2.5 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................ 17 4.2 PM10 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 20 4.3 O3 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 23 4.4 PB MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 24 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 2 4.5 SO2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................... 25 4.6 NO2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 26 4.7 CO MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 27 4.8 PAMS MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 28 4.9 NCORE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 30 4.10 SIP MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 31 NOTE: SITES IN ITALICS ARE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN SIP; OTHERS MEET THE GENERAL SIP REQUIREMENT THAT REPRESENTATIVE MONITORING BE CONDUCTED (NO SPECIFIC MONITORING SITES ARE NAMED IN SIP).......................... 32 4.11 SOURCE COMPLIANCE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................. 33 4.12 CLASS 1 VISIBILITY NETWORK ............................................................................................................... 34 4.13 URBAN HAZE MONITORING NETWORK ................................................................................................... 35 4.14 METEOROLOGY MONITORING NETWORK ................................................................................................ 36 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................................................. 39 5.1 THE QUALITY SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 MEASUREMENT QUALITY CHECKS ............................................................................................................ 42 5.3 CALCULATIONS AND REPORTING .............................................................................................................. 42 5.4.2 SUMMARY OF AUDITS CONDUCTED BY EPA ........................................................................................... 44 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................... 45 APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS ............................................................................................................ 48 APPENDIX C SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES ................................................................................ 59 APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES ................................................................................. 90 APPENDIX E MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CRITERIA POLLUTANTS............................................ 145 APPENDIX F REQUEST FOR SITING WAIVER…………………………………................. ................................ 149 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a), requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual monitoring network plan for the year 2013. This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 2012, as well as activities ADEQ will undertake through December 2014. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database and to AIRNow. In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contain the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality. Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully chosen physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:            State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) Special Purpose Monitors (SPM) Urban Haze monitoring sites Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) AIRNow information sites Source‐oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry) Meteorological sites This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E as follows:     Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring The results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they should be modified (through termination of existing stations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 4 monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet their objectives and data needs. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the monitoring networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and regulatory compliant air quality data. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 5 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics across the programs or networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's current and recently closed monitoring sites including those sites that ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs in which ADEQ participates is described in the following sections. 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network ADEQ’s compliance network consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments designated by EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria:           Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant Objectives and spatial scales Sampling frequency Collocation Special NCore‐related requirements Meteorology Probe location and other restrictions within a site Periodic performance evaluations Quality Assurance Data reporting 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently in non‐ attainment for one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met but on‐going demonstration of maintenance is required. Specific monitoring requirements for each of these areas are described in their respective SIPs and/or Maintenance Plans. 2.3 Source Oriented Network Several major point sources in the state are required to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM10 and SO2, as part of their air quality permit. Some of the monitoring data from these sites are submitted to AQS. As indicated in the 2012 Network Plan, ADEQ met with Freeport‐McMoRan Copper and Gold, Inc. (FMMI) to discuss the role of Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the Miami Golf Course PM10, Miami Townsite SO2, and Miami Jones Ranch SO2 monitors. ADEQ collocated instruments at these sites to State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 6 meet the PQAO requirements for submittal of these data to AQS. ADEQ installed the PM10 monitor at the Miami Golf Course site in fall 2012, and the SO2 monitors at the Miami Jones Ranch site and Miami Townsite in early 2013. Data are being collected from both the FMMI and ADEQ monitors at these sites for at least one year for comparability analysis and preparation of the comparative data analysis review for submittal to EPA 2.4 NCore Network EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some of the objectives of the NCore network are:  Tracking long‐term trends of criteria and non‐criteria pollutants;  Support for long‐term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;  Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; and, support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses. As required by 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples include advanced communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html 2.5 Meteorological Network ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ added meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that were not previously equipped and for which there are adequate facilities to support the meteorological tower and equipment. 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O3 that includes concurrent monitoring of O3, oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total reactive nitrogen (NOy, speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, ADEQ began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of O3. The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their monitoring networks in O3 non‐attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutants and meteorological data are the widespread non‐attainment of the O3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O3 and its precursors. ADEQ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 7 operates three PAMS sites to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area: JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley (type 3), and VEI (meteorological). EPA assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and consider the possible re‐invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and included PAMS objectives, methods, network design, and quality assurance. ADEQ participates in the PAMS re‐invention process and will continue to follow its activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network. 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes the human exposure risks from the various pollutants. Detection of increased human toxicity risk can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long‐term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM2.5 samples collected at select sites throughout the country. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs. The network has increased to around 200 sites nationwide. PM2.5 speciation monitoring at JLG Supersite includes two CSN PM2.5 speciation samplers and two IMPROVE samplers. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the IMPROVE network and the data are reasonably comparable to the CSN speciation data. In 2009, the URG 3000N sampler was added at JLG for collecting the carbon sample in lieu of the Met One SuperSASS, which had been used to collect all three types of filter samples. The laboratory analysis method for carbon samples collected by the URG also changed. These changes to the CSN program’s monitoring and analytical design were geared toward more closely matching the carbon analytes from the CSN sampler to those collected via the IMPROVE network. 2.9 Class 1 Area Network and IMPROVE Program The rural visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class 1 areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests, which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and to which visual air was an important resource for the visitor experience. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally‐ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 8 operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 Wilderness areas across the United States. In addition to the eleven Class 1 sites (two were combined in the past) ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites identified as Protocol sites. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class 1 Visibility and IMPROVE networks. 2.10 AIRNow Reporting ADEQ provides data to the AIRNow system. Data currently being submitted to AIRNow on a near‐real time basis includes O3, continuous PM10 and PM2.5, and SO2 data. ADEQ will continue to expand efforts for data submission to AIRNow to support the collection and dissemination of nationwide and consistently provided air quality data in the Air Quality Index (AQI) format that is being used by local weather forecasters, medical facilities, schools and the general public to make health‐based activity decisions based on the reported local AQI. 2.11 Urban Haze Network The purpose of the Urban Haze Network is to provide State and Local policy‐makers and the public with information regarding the urban haze levels, track short‐term and long‐term trends, assess source contributions, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. More than a decade of urban visibility data has been collected for the Phoenix and Tucson area. ADEQ utilizes transmissometers, particulate monitors, and/or digital camera systems to evaluate urban visibility. Currently, only the Phoenix metropolitan area urban visibility is monitored. The existing Phoenix area cameras sites were recently upgraded with higher resolution cameras. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13. 2.12 E‐BAM Network of PM2.5 Special Purpose Monitors The current network of special purpose continuous particulate monitors (listed in Table 2.12‐1) is composed of lightweight, portable E‐BAM monitors typically in self‐contained, environmentally sealed enclosures. They can be battery or solar powered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. Data are sampled every second and concentrations are calculated and recorded every minute. E‐BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United States. They provide continuous, real‐time particulate concentration data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns and wildfire monitoring. E‐BAM instruments are used only as special purpose monitors. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily in populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from prescribed burns and wildfires. In 2011 ADEQ configured the E‐BAM monitors to measure PM2.5 to be consistent with the National Forest Service monitors. Hourly PM2.5 data from the E‐BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 9 Table 2.12‐1 Current Locations of E‐BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Payson Well 204 W. Aero Dr., Payson, AZ 85541 Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322 2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network ADEQ works with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group is reviewing the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluating the adequacy of these networks. The second priority of this group is to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are expected to develop, such that data are shared across the border and capacity is built to meet the needs of the air monitoring program objectives. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 10 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION This section provides a summary of changes to ADEQ's monitoring networks completed since the 2012 Network Plan submission; as well as changes planned for July 2013 through December 2014. Any occurrence of unplanned changes due to emerging need, budget constraints, or other circumstances will be documented in next year’s Air Monitoring Network Plan. Below is a summary of the planned network changes. Details regarding these changes can be found in Section 4. 3.1 Site Closures Prescott Valley – Although monitoring began in 2007, the MSA population does not require PM10 nor PM2.5 monitoring in Prescott Valley. Statistical analysis shows that these monitors are reporting concentrations significantly below the NAAQS. ADEQ is requesting to close both PM10 and PM2.5 monitors at this site at the end of 2013. See Section 3.5 for statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 58.14(c) (1). 3.2 New Sites Planned Miami, AZ area SO2 sites – ADEQ added SO2 monitors at existing Freeport‐McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc (FMMI) sites, Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite. These monitors will be concurrently run along side FMMI monitors until sufficient data is collected so a comparative analysis can be prepared and forwarded to EPA. 3.3 Network Changes – Current and Planned Alamo Lake – This site is currently the background site for the O3 network. The site is sufficiently remote that it is being configured to be the designated background site for several pollutants. ADEQ plans to begin operating a PM2.5 FEM BAM 1020 at Alamo Lake by January 2014. ADEQ also plans to establish this site as a SO2 background site so that data from this site can be used for background emissions in modeling. ADEQ is currently assessing the availability of trace‐level SO2 for placement at this site. Bullhead City PM10 – ADEQ installed a continuous PM10 TEOM on July 1, 2012 to replace the filter‐based Partisol 2000 FRM. Douglas Red Cross PM10 and PM2.5 – ADEQ installed a continuous PM10 TEOM at the Douglas Red Cross site in October 2012 to meet the required sampling frequency. It ran concurrently with the Partisol 2000 FRM until it was removed on January 1, 2013. ADEQ also installed a continuous PM2.5 FEM BAM 1020 in April 2013, which ran concurrently with the Partisol 2000 FRM until it was removed in July 1, 2013. Flagstaff PM10 and PM2.5 – The statistical analysis for Flagstaff shows that PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are significantly below the NAAQS and the monitors are not required for this area based on MSA population. ADEQ is requesting to discontinue both the PM10 and PM2.monitors at the end of 2013. See Section 3.5 for the statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 58.14(c)(1). Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite SO2 – ADEQ installed SO2 analyzers at the Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite in January 2013 to ensure the data are meeting the AQS quality assurance requirements. FMMI will continue to operate their SO2 monitors until a correlation study between the two sets of monitors can be State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 11 made. ADEQ’s data meet the PQAO requirements and will be used for submittal to AQS. ADEQ will prepare a report in the summer of 2014 comparing and analyzing these data for submittal to EPA for review and determination regarding the Miami Ridgeline design value and the continued need for collocated monitors at Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite. Nogales Post Office PM2.5 – An FEM BAM 1020 continuous monitor replaced the PM2.5 1‐in‐6 day Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM as the primary monitor in April 2013. The Partisol 2000 FRM is the QA collocated monitor for the PM2.5 network. This QA collocated monitor will operate on a 1‐in‐6 day sampling schedule. ADEQ will continue to operate the site’s second PM2.5 1‐in‐6 day Partisol 2000 through December 2013. Paul Spur Chemical Lime PM10 – An FEM PM10 TEOM continuous monitor replaced the PM10 1‐in‐6 day Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM in April 2012. Payson Well Site PM10 – Part of the network planning process is to assess the representativeness of the monitors for sampling ambient air. There have been several structural changes at the Payson Well Site that are limiting airflow around this monitor. These include construction of new buildings and growth of trees. ADEQ met with the site manager to define a more suitable location. By January 1, 2014, ADEQ plans to install a single PM10 FEM BAM 1020 at Payson Well Site, thereby replacing the collocated Partisol PM10 FRM monitors. As a result, this site will no longer be collocated for PM10, as there is no collocation requirement for PM10 FEM monitors. ADEQ is requesting approval by EPA Region 9 in the attached letter for the relocation of the current PM10 monitoring location (Lat: 34.2294; Long: ‐111.3297) to a parcel 90 meters to the east at location (Lat: 34.2296; Long: ‐ 111.3295). The PM10 monitoring will remain on the same property and better meet the required siting criteria. The AQS Site ID and Site Name will remain the same. Please see Figure 3.3‐1 and Figure 3.3‐2 below for aerial photographs of the site relocation schematic. Figure 3.3‐1 Aerial photograph of current PM10 monitor location at Payson Well Site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 12 Figure 3.3‐2 Google Earth Image of the proposed PM10 monitor location at Payson Well Site Vehicle Emissions Laboratory ‐ The PAMS re‐engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and limited use of the Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and wind profiler data. ADEQ has not been able to calibrate these instruments for a number of years due to the high cost for maintenance and calibrations (re‐ calibrations estimate is $30,000). ADEQ has discontinued data collection from these instruments, because the quality assurance requirements cannot be met resulting in unreliable data. Alternatives are being reviewed. Yuma Supersite PM2.5 ‐ The PM2.5 Partisol 2000 FRM was replaced by an FEM BAM 1020 in July 2013. This site is also designated as the ADEQ Transport site for the PM2.5 monitoring network. Table 3.3‐1 Instruments Changes Made from July 2012 thru June 2013 Site Name Monitors Date of Change Vehicle Emissions Laboratory RASS and Wind Profiler 30‐Jun‐2012 The RASS and Wind Profiler has been nonoperational for a number of years due to lack of calibration and cost of maintenance. Bullhead City PM10 1‐Jul‐2012 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM with a continuous FEM TEOM Douglas Red Cross PM10 1‐Jan‐2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM with a continuous FEM TEOM Nogales Post Office PM10 1‐Jan‐2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM with a continuous FEM BAM 1020 – the Partisol will continue to be operated until ADEQ determines the Partisol is fit for removal Miami Jones Ranch SO2 1‐Apr‐2013 Installed ADEQ SO2 analyzer to meet PQAO requirement for NAAQS determinations Miami Townsite SO2 1‐Apr‐2013 Installed ADEQ SO2 analyzer to meet PQAO requirement for NAAQS determinations Description State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 13 Site Name Nogales Post Office Monitors PM2.5 Date of Change Description 1‐Apr‐2013 Replaced Partisol FRM with a continuous FEM BAM 1020 – this monitor is now the designated primary and operates with a collocated Partisol FRM. ADEQ will continue to operate the additional Partisol FRM at this site through December 2013. Table 3.4‐2 Instruments Changes Planned for July 2013 to December 2014 Site Name Monitors Date of Change Douglas Red Cross PM2.5 1‐Jul‐2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter‐based FRM with a continuous FEM BAM 1020 Yuma Supersite PM2.5 1‐Jul‐2013 Partisol 2000 FRM was replaced by an FEM BAM 1020. This site is the PM2.5 designated Transport site. Alamo Lake PM2.5 1‐Jan‐2014 An FEM BAM 1020 will be deployed to the site by January 1, 2014. This is the PM2.5 designated Background site. 1‐Jan‐2014 Monitors will be discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. System modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR 58.14(C)(1). See Figure 3.5‐1. A special purpose PM2.5 monitor (E‐BAM) will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website. Ozone monitoring will continue at this site. 1‐Jan‐2014 Currently collocated Partisol FRM PM10 monitors will be replaced with a PM10 FEM BAM 1020. Collocation is not required at this site. Monitoring to be relocated within site property. 1‐Jan‐2014 Monitors will be discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. System modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR 58.14(C)(1). See Figure 3.5‐1. A special purpose PM2.5 monitor (E‐BAM) will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website. Flagstaff Middle School PM10, PM2.5 Payson Well Site PM10 Prescott Valley PM10, PM2.5 Description State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 14 3.5 Requests for EPA Region 9 Approval to Discontinue Particulate Monitoring at Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley In conformance with 40 CFR 58.14(c)(1), ADEQ requests EPA Region 9 Administrator’s approval for the following network changes:   The discontinuation of PM10 SLAMS monitors at the Flagstaff Middle School (AQS ID 04‐005‐1008) and Prescott Valley (AQS 04‐025‐2002) sites, The discontinuation of PM2.5 SLAMS monitors at the Flagstaff Middle School (AQS ID 04‐005‐1008) and Prescott Valley (AQS 04‐025‐2002) sites. These monitors are “not specifically required by an attainment plan or maintenance plan.” For the PM10 monitor discontinuations, according to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D Table D‐5, for Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley, the minimum required number of PM10 monitors for each city is zero. This is based on populations (MSA) <250,000 (134,421 and 211,033 respectively) and the ambient PM10 data showing ambient concentrations <120 μg/m3, which is 80% of PM10 NAAQS (150 μg/m3). The most recent five‐year average maximum ambient concentration is 43.4 μg/m3 at Flagstaff and 54.6 μg/m3 at Prescott Valley, see Figure 3.5‐1. For the PM2.5 monitor discontinuation, according to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D Table D‐5, for Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley, the minimum required number of PM2.5 monitors for each city is zero. This is based on a population (MSA) <500,000 (134,421 and 211,033 respectively) and the most recent three‐year design value <85% of any PM2.5 NAAQS. Eighty‐five percent of the PM2.5 24‐hour NAAQS is 29.75 μg/m3 (0.85 x 35 μg/m3) and eighty‐five‐percent of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS is 10.2 μg/m3 (0.85 x 12 μg/m3). Flagstaff Middle School’s most recent three‐year PM2.5 24‐hour design value is 5.2 μg/m3 and the three‐year PM2.5 annual design value is 12 μg/m3. Prescott Valley’s most recent three‐year PM2.5 24‐hour design value is 9.0 μg/m3 and the three‐year PM2.5 annual design value is 4.0 μg/m3. Using the last five‐years of certified data and Formula 1 shown below with the appropriate t‐value from section 4.1 of the Network Assessment Guidance 2007 document, Table 3.5‐1 shows that these four monitors each have a probability of less than 10% of exceeding 80% of the applicable NAAQS during the next three years based on trends, concentrations, and variability observed in the past. Formula 1 t = 2.132 (4 degrees of freedom) Where is the average design value for the last 5 years, t is the student’s t value for n‐1 degrees of freedom at the 90% Upper Confidence Limit, s is the standard deviation of the design values, n is the number of records (i.e., number of design values), and NAAQS is the standard of interest. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 15 Table 3.5‐1 PM10 & PM2.5 Monitor Discontinuance Statistical Support Site Monitor 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 5‐Year Avg. Max Conc. Flagstaff PM 10 Annual Max Conc. Value 45 47 26 61 38 43.40 12.82 2.132 5 Prescott Valley PM 10 Annual Max Conc. Value 42.3 59.9 41 90.8 39 54.60 21.90 2.132 Flagstaff PM 2.5 24Hr Design Value 18 19 13 14 12 15.20 3.11 Flagstaff PM 2.5 Annual Design Value 6.8 7.1 6.1 5.9 5.2 6.22 Prescott Valley PM 2.5 24Hr Design Value 12 13 11 10 9 Prescott Valley PM 2.5 Annual Design Value 5.9 5.5 5.0 4.3 4.0 NAAQS s t n 90% UCL 80% NAAQS 90%UCL is <80% 55.6 120 YES 5 75.5 120 YES 2.132 5 18.2 28 YES 0.75 2.132 5 6.9 9.6 YES 11.00 1.58 2.132 5 12.5 28 YES 4.94 0.80 2.132 5 5.7 9.6 YES State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 16 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS The monitoring requirements for the number of sites in the SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas. Current minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Table 4.0‐1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population Flagstaff Coconino County 134,421 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 200,186 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887 Prescott Yavapai County 211,033 Sierra Vista‐Douglas Cochise 131,346 Tucson Pima County 980,263 Yuma Yuma County 195,751 Table 4.0‐2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420 Payson Gila 53,597 Safford Graham 37,220 Show Low Navajo 107,449 4.1 PM2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0‐1) and design values for PM2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1‐1). State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 17 Table 4.1‐1 Minimum Number of PM2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3‐Yr design value ≥ 85% of any PM2.5 NAAQS * Most recent 3‐Yr design value <85% any PM2.5 NAAQS * >1,000,000 3 2 500,000 – <1,000,000 2 1 50,000 – <500,000 1 0 85% Annual NAAQS (12 μg/m3) = 10.2 μg/m3; 85% 24‐Hour NAAQS (35 μg/m3) = 29.75 μg/m3 The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter‐based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1‐2). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1) states the manual PM2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM2.5 monitor. Table 4.1‐2 PM2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ FRM/FEM Sites 2010‐2012 2010‐2012 24‐Hour Design Annual Design Value (μg/m3) Value (μg/m3) Sample AQS Site ID Site Name Frequency 04‐003‐1005 Douglas Red Cross 13 6.7 Continuous 04‐005‐1008 Flagstaff Middle School 12 5.2 1‐in‐6 Day 04‐012‐8000 Alamo Lake1 N/A1 N/A1 Continuous 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite 20 8.2 Continuous 04‐023‐0004 Nogales Post Office 28 9.8 Continuous 04‐025‐2002 Prescott Valley 9 4.0 1‐in‐6 Day 04‐027‐8011 Yuma Supersite2 15 7.8 Continuous 1 PM2.5 monitoring will begin on Jan. 1, 2014 and be designated as the Background site for the PM2.5 Network 2 Designated Transport site in the PM2.5 Network State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 18 ADEQ currently operates EPA‐approved FEM monitors at six PM2.5 monitoring sites. An additional EPA‐approved FEM monitor will be deployed to the Alamo Lake site in January 2014 and this site will be the designated PM2.5 Background site in the PM2.5 monitoring network. Yuma Supersite is designated as the required PM2.5 Transport site. ADEQ operates both an EPA‐approved FEM continuous monitor and a Partisol 2000 PM2.5 FRM at the JLG Supersite fulfilling an NCore requirement. The EPA‐approved FEM sampler is designated the primary PM2.5 monitor for NAAQS compliance purposes. Several non‐FEM continuous PM2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are associated with the Smoke Management E‐BAM network. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the E‐BAM network. As previously stated, the FRM monitors at Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley are scheduled to operate through the end of 2013 and be discontinued. ADEQ evaluated the need for PM2.5 monitors at Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley and determined that both monitors can be removed due to the long history of low concentrations at both sites. 4.1.1 PM2.5 Collocation Requirements For the ADEQ PM2.5 network, one site is required to have collocated monitoring. The Nogales Post Office site has the highest PM2.5 design value in ADEQ’s PM2.5 network and is therefore the designated PM2.5 collocated site. ADEQ operates both an EPA‐approved FEM continuous instrument and two Partisol 2000 PM2.5 FRM instrument at the Nogales Post Office site. The FEM BAM 1020 is designated as the primary PM2.5 monitor for this site enabling ADEQ to exceed the required 1‐in‐3 day monitoring frequency. This combination of instruments also fulfills the collocation requirement of the PM2.5 network for ADEQ. The second Partisol 2000 PM2.5 FRM instrument will operate through December 2013. The QA collocated Partisol PM2.5 FRM operates on a 1‐in‐6 day monitoring frequency rather than the required 1‐in‐12 day monitoring frequency. Additionally, ADEQ operates one Partisol 2000 PM2.5 FRM instrument and one continuous PM2.5 FEM monitor at the JLG Supersite. This PM2.5 FEM is designated the primary instrument as required by NCore. The PM2.5 FEM monitor is also labeled as an NCore PMcoarse paired monitor. The PM2.5 FRM instrument is labeled as a QA collocated instrument for the site. Table 4.1‐3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM2.5 collocation requirements. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 19 Table 4.1‐3 PM2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code (Instrument Type) # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 143 (Partisol 2000) 2 0 0 0 170 (Met One BAM 1020) 5 5 1 2 4.1.2 Relocating Any Violating PM2.5 Monitors A process for relocating violating PM2.5 monitors is required and described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone. The analysis includes a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor. ADEQ does not have any violating PM2.5 monitors that are being considered for relocation. 4.2 PM10 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM10 samplers required in urban areas is based on the population of the area (see Table 4.2‐1) and design values for PM10 24‐hour concentrations (see Table 4.2‐2). Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have delegated authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting. ADEQ's PM10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM10 non‐attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ operates a PMcoarse monitor (difference method using paired FEM BAM 1020 instruments) in the Phoenix metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. JLG Supersite PM10 concentrations for NCore are provided by the PM10 FEM BAM 1020. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 20 Table 4.2‐1 Minimum Number of PM10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Medium High Concentration Low Concentration Concentration Exceeds 24‐Hour Less than 80% of MSA Population Exceeds 80% of NAAQS by 20% or 24‐Hour NAAQS 24‐Hour NAAQS more (>180µg/m3) (<120 µg/m3) 3 (>120µg/m ) >1,000,000 6‐10 4‐8 2‐4 500,000 – <1,000,000 4‐8 2‐4 1‐2 250,000 – <500,000 3‐4 1‐2 0‐1 100,000 – <250,000 1‐2 0‐1 0 The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12(e) states that for PM10 sites, “…the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24‐hour standard.” ADEQ has transitioned several PM10 monitors from filter‐based methods to continuous methods and by January 1, 2014 all the primary PM10 monitors in the ADEQ PM10 network will be continuous methods. Table 4.2‐2 lists the PM10 network site Design Values and Annual Means. Table 4.2‐2 PM10 Design Values (Est. Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 2010 ‐ 2012 Average Estimated Days PM10>150 μg/m3 Including Events 2010 – 2012 Average Estimated Days PM10>150 μg/m3 Excluding Events 2012 Annual Mean Concentration (μg/m3) 04‐003‐0011 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 0.31 0 25.4 04‐003‐1005 Douglas Red Cross 0* 0 31.2 04‐005‐1008 Flagstaff Middle School 0 0 17.3 04‐007‐0008 Payson Well Site 0 0 20.4 04‐007‐1001 Hayden Old Jail 1 0.3 43.2 04‐007‐8000 Miami Golf Course 0* 0* 23.9 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 21 N/A2 N/A2 N/A2 04‐012‐8000 Alamo Lake 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite 0 0 34.9 04‐015‐1003 Bullhead City 0.31 0 21.81 04‐019‐0001 Ajo 1.4 04‐019‐0020 Rillito 2.7* 04‐023‐0004 Nogales Post Office 3.8* 04‐025‐2002 Prescott Valley 0 04‐027‐8011 Yuma Supersite 4.1 33.7 0 43.6 * 36.7 3.8* 12.5 0 47.8 0 * Annual values not meeting completeness criteria; ADEQ monitoring at Miami Golf Course began July 27, 2012 1 Filter‐based and continuous records were merged to calculate value 2 Monitoring at Alamo Lake is scheduled to begin Jan. 1, 2014 4.2.1 PM10 Collocation Requirements There are no collocation requirements for EPA‐approved PM10 FEM monitors. ADEQ has transitioned the PM10 network to continuous FEM monitors. ADEQ does operate an additional Partisol 2000 FRM at the Nogales Post Office site. While the FEM is designated as the primary PM10 monitor, the Partisol monitor is designated a QA collocated PM10 instrument. Table 4.2‐3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM10 collocation requirements. Table 4.2‐3 PM10 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 126 (Partisol 2000) 5 2* 1* 1* 079 (TEOM) 8 8 0 0 122 (BAM) 2 2 0 0 * The Partisol 2000 monitors at the Payson Well Site will be replaced with a single FEM BAM 1020 beginning January 2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 22 4.3 O3 Monitoring Network Requirements Table 4.3‐1 Minimum Number of O3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8‐hour Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) or no Design Value available Most recent 3 year 8‐hour Design Value <85% NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) >10 Million 4 2 4 – <10 Million 3 1 350,000 – <4 Million 2 1 50,000 – <350,000 1 0 The minimum monitoring requirements for O3 are shown above in Table 4.3‐1. ADEQ operates a network of seven O3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3‐2). ADEQ is updating the O3 network with remote zero/span/precision checks utilizing the Teledyne T703 UV Photometric O3 Calibrator with Internal Zero Air Pump and External Zero Air Shut‐Off Valve. This will allow Air Monitoring Staff to more efficiently maintain the O3 network while minimizing travel time during the O3 season and avoiding calibration during the peak hours of the day when O3.levels are highest. Additionally, the Counties of Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal also operate O3 monitors. Table 4.3‐2 ADEQ O3 Sites and Design Values AQS Site ID Site Current Operating Schedule 2010‐2012 Design Value (ppm) 04‐005‐1008 Flagstaff Middle School March ‐ October 0.069 04‐007‐0010 Tonto National Monument March ‐ October 0.074 04‐012‐8000 Alamo Lake March ‐ October 0.072 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite January ‐ December 0.076 04‐021‐8001 Queen Valley March ‐ October 0.076 04‐025‐8033 Prescott College AQD March ‐ October 0.069 04‐027‐8011 Yuma Supersite March ‐ October 0.077 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 23 4.3.1 O3 Season In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), “Deviation from the [January‐to‐December] O3 monitoring season must be approved by the EPA Regional Administrator, documented in the annual network plan, and updated in AQS. Information on how to analyze O3 data to support a change to the O3 season in support of the 8‐hour standard for a specific state can be found in reference 8 to this appendix” Reference 8 refers to the Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8‐hour Ozone Standard. In compliance with this document, ADEQ analyzed the most recent six years of O3 data (2007‐2012 O3 data from ADEQ sites) to create the chart in Figure 4.3‐1, which is the basis of ADEQ’s request for modifying the O3 season to March through October. The only two days in October > 75 ppb occurred in 2009, which included an unusually high number of exceedance days. The O3 season was extended in 2012 to include March because some parts of Arizona begin experiencing low concentrations of O3 in March. ADEQ does additional monitoring in the off‐season of November – February for its own purposes; however, those data are not being reported to the AQS database. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule. Figure 4.3‐1 Average Number of Days O3 > 75 ppb all ADEQ Sites Combined Average (2007-2012) Number of Days-per-Month Ozone > 75 ppb (all ADEQ Sites) 35 Days > 75 ppb 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ has operated three source‐oriented TSP Hi‐Vol Pb monitors between the Globe Highway site (collocated) and the Miami Golf Course site since January 2011. For the NCore‐Pb requirement, ADEQ uses the same PM10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples and on June 1, 2012 received EPA approval for the ICP‐MS analysis method for lead in PM10. No changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb‐PM10 data collected at JLG Supersite; however, parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with these data in AQS. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 24 4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements ADEQ’s Pb network requires only one collocated site. The Globe Highway site located in Hayden, AZ has the highest design value in the Pb network and is therefore the collocated site. Although ADEQ monitors NCore‐Pb at the JLG Supersite, collocated NCore‐Pb sites are determined by the EPA and JLG Supersite is not a designated NCore‐Pb collocated site. Table 4.4‐1 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements. Table 4.4‐1 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 191 (Pb‐TSP ICP/MS) 2 2 1 1 202 (Pb‐PM10 ICP/MS) 1 1 0* 0 * Pb‐PM10 monitor is located at an NCore site and does not require collocation Table 4.4‐2 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 2010‐2012 Design Value (µg/m3) 04‐007‐1002 Globe Highway 1 0.27 04‐007‐8000 Miami Golf Course 2 0.06 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite ‐‐* * Design Value not available; PM10 Metals (low‐Vol., filter‐based) analysis method approved June 2012 1 Design Value based on 2 years of data, but is valid due to NAAQS violation 2 Design Value based on 2 years of data 4.5 SO2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates a network of five SO2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. Sources, ASARCO LLC and Freeport‐McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., also operate SO2 monitoring networks in Gila County for permit compliance and to support SIP requirements. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both companies to ensure that the monitors are operated under the required quality assurance requirements. For Miami, ADEQ runs the Miami Ridgeline site and recently added collocated SO2 monitors at the Miami Townsite and Jones Ranch sites, which FMMI has been monitoring. For Hayden, ADEQ currently operated a SO2 monitors at Hayden Old Jail. ADEQ initiated discussions with ASARCO LLC regarding Globe Highway and Montgomery Ranch on the best means to meet the PQAO requirements. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 25 Table 4.5‐1 SO2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2010‐2012 1‐Hour Design Value (ppb) AQS Site ID Site Name 04‐007‐0011 Miami Jones Ranch 04‐007‐0009 Miami Ridgeline 107 04‐007‐0012 Miami Townsite ‐‐* 04‐007‐1001 Hayden Old Jail 285 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite ‐‐* 6 *Design Value not available; monitoring began February 2013 The SO2 monitoring requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a Population Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO2 monitor while CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO2. These SO2 monitors are operated by Maricopa County and Pima County respectively. ADEQ installed SO2 monitors at Freeport McMoRan’s Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites in February 2013. Data from these monitors will be reported quarterly to EPA’s AQS database. ADEQ does operate a trace‐level SO2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. 4.6 NO2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates only one NO2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO2 monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement. The NO2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near‐roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near‐roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 and containing roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT require two near‐roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0‐1, two CBSAs within Arizona (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) contain populations greater than 500,000, and therefore, require at least one NO2 near‐roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA exceeds 2.5 million in population; therefore, two near‐roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. Pima and Maricopa Counties will operate the required near‐roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix, respectively. In addition to the near‐roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area‐wide NO2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO2 monitor to measure NO2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that requires ambient monitoring of NO2. The State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 26 current NO2 monitors operated by Maricopa and Pima Counties meeting the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NOx measurements required by the PAMS program. The NO2 monitor at JLG Supersite has an annual mean of 18 ppb and a three‐year 1‐hour design value of 55 ppb; see Table 4.6‐1. Table 4.6‐1 NO2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2010‐2012 AQS Site ID Site Name 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite 1‐Hour Design Value (ppb) 2012 Annual Mean (ppb) 55 18.0 4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates only one CO (carbon monoxide) monitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and has sufficient sensitivity to monitor trace levels. This CO monitor fulfills NCore as well as PAMS monitoring requirements. Maricopa and Pima counties operate the other required CO monitors within the State of Arizona. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million population requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near‐road NO2 monitor. The required near‐roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County. The most recent census data show the Tucson MSA is below one million and therefore near‐road CO monitoring is not required. The Trace‐Level CO (COTL) analyzer that is currently operated by ADEQ exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. Due to the low range at which the JLG COTL analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution be exercised when utilizing these data for the purpose of NAAQS compliance. Under most circumstances, the data would be used to determine compliance with the CO NAAQS. However, due to the consistently low ambient concentrations, the trace‐level analyzer’s operating range is set at 0‐5 ppm, which is the range most frequently measured at JLG. This operating range is well below the CO NAAQS of 9 ppm, therefore, when/if under certain rare circumstances, the CO concentrations are > 5 ppm, determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible, because measurement uncertainty increases and becomes challenging to statistically quantify. Table 4.7‐1 contains the most recent Design Values for CO at JLG Supersite. Table 4.7‐1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites AQS Site ID Site Name 04‐013‐9997 JLG Supersite 2012 CO 1‐Hour Max. Value (ppm) 2012 CO 8‐Hour Max. Value (ppm) 2.9 1.8 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 27 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme non‐attainment for O3. Two sites are required for each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, Carbonyls, NOx, trace‐level reactive oxides of nitrogen (NOy), CO, O3, surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August. ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix‐Mesa‐Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data. JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. Since the required manual method of eight three‐hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24‐hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re‐engineering program are available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O3, CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8‐1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS, but because carbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no current plans to discontinue carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite. Table 4.8‐1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration VOC * June – August Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs. Carbonyl * June – August Multi‐port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6th day, 3 – 3 hr samples (0500‐0800, 0800‐1100, 1100‐1400) CO Jan – Dec Trace CO Hourly average O3 Jan – Dec O3 Analyzer Hourly average NOx Jan – Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec  Wind speed/direction Hourly average  Temperature  Relative humidity * 24‐hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also part of the NATTS program and collected year‐round. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 28 Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include: speciated PAMS VOCs, O3, total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five‐Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8‐2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site. Table 4.8‐2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration VOC June – August Multi‐port sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs, and 3 – 3 hr samples (0500‐0800, 1300‐1600, 1600‐ 1900) O3 March – October O3 Analyzer Hourly average NOy June – August NOy Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec  Wind speed/direction Hourly average  Temperature  Relative humidity Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters), and relative humidity. The National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport collects barometric pressure and precipitation measurements. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and a Wind Profiler had also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights since 1998 until July 2012. The PAMS re‐engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and very limited use of the RASS and Wind Profiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use – particularly if usable data is available from other sources. ADEQ considered the high operational cost and very limited data use when deciding to discontinue its operation. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 29 Table 4.8‐3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Meteorology Jan – Dec Method  Pyranometer (total solar radiation)  Ultra‐violet (UV solar)  Wind speed/direction  Temperature  Relative humidity Duration Hourly average 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has been a multipollutant monitoring site since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, including: SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, CSN, and meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9‐1. The required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver requesting to substitute NOx monitoring for NOy. The NCore‐Pb requirement is being met by using the current PM10 metals speciation sampler (PM10 Partisol 2000) and associated samples. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG analysis method for PM10 metals speciation was approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) for the analysis of Pb. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore site, the parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with Pb‐PM10 data in AQS. Table 4.9‐1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Frequency/Duration Status Required Measurement PM2.5 FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, designated primary PM2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd day Thermo Partisol 2000 is current instrument; PM2.5 samples collected since 1999 PM10 FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair PMcoarse FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, difference method PM2.5 speciation ‐ organic and elemental carbon, major ions, and 24 hour average; every 3rd day Met One SuperSASS with URG module is current instrument; STN/CSN samples collected since 1999 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 30 trace metals Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM10 metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP‐MS analysis method as an FEM. O3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E CO (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9830T SO2 (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9850T NO/NO2/NOx Hourly Ecotech EC9841 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC9843 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics temperature/relative humidity probe currently in operation 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ, along with other delegated agencies, are responsible for the preparation and submittal of SIPs for non‐ attainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for areas not included within Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties or tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in the area’s SIP; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10‐1 lists the ADEQ and source‐operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance. Table 4.10‐1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O3 1‐hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix‐Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O3 8‐hr “Basic” Non‐attainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM10 Moderate Non‐attainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM10 Maintenance/Attainment Douglas‐Paul Spur, Cochise PM10 Moderate Non‐attainment Douglas Red Cross, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Bullhead City (Post Office) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 31 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail Miami, Gila PM10 Moderate Non‐attainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline Nogales, Santa Cruz PM10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Payson, Gila PM10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) PM10 Serious Non‐attainment JLG Supersite Rillito, Pima PM10 Moderate Non‐attainment Rillito Yuma, Yuma PM10 Moderate Non‐attainment Yuma Supersite Nogales, Santa Cruz PM2.5 Non‐attainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Douglas, Cochise SO2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO2 Non‐attainment – Primary ADEQ (SO2, MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO2, 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction Miami, Gila SO2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline Freeport McMoRan (SO2, MET) Miami Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite Morenci, Greenlee SO2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class 1 areas Visibility Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe National Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West National Monument, Meadview Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, PM2.5 species) NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon ‐ Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon ‐ Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Station, Saguaro National Park‐East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites are named in SIP). State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 32 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ requires select major and minor point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around their facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit or timeframe specified therein. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of instruments at some of these sites and review of ambient monitoring data submitted according to the permit requirements. Sources are required to review and validate their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11‐1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. Any data submitted to AQS needs to be performed by a Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) that meets all the quality assurance requirements. Data from the ASARCO and FMMI monitors are being submitted to AQS to use for regulatory decisions. In spring 2012, ADEQ send letters to ASARCO and FMMI discussion the PQAO requirements and suggesting that they meet with ADEQ to discuss options. FMMI representatives met with ADEQ, and in January 2013, ADEQ collocated monitors at the existing FMMI’s Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to discuss similar changes. Except for potential changes to the Miami and Hayden area networks noted above, the only other change in the source compliance monitoring network includes the discontinuation of source operated PM10 monitors in Rillito. ADEQ has operated a continuous PM10 TEOM in Rillito for several years; therefore, PM10 monitoring conducted by the source was determined to be redundant and unnecessary. Table 4.11‐1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal Globe Highway Winkelman SO2 No ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. Hayden SO2 No ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch Hayden SO2 No ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO2 No Hayden Old Jail 1 Hayden SO2 No Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon PM10, PM2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology No Miami Ridgeline Miami PM10 mass and metals Yes (PM10 mass only) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 33 Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal speciation Miami Golf Course Miami PM10 mass and metals speciation, collocated Miami Jones Ranch 1 Miami SO2 No Miami Townsite 1 Miami SO2 No Clarkdale PM10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No Clarkdale PM10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No Globe PM10, H2SO4, Meteorology No PCC – Clarkdale NW PCC – Clarkdale SE Carlota Mine – Sanctuary 1 Yes (PM10 mass only) ADEQ also operates an SO2 monitor at this site. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not. 4.12 Class 1 Visibility Network As stated previously, visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas called Class 1 areas based on designations made by the 1977 CAA Amendments. The evaluations, performed by the USFS and NPS, reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were: designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and had visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. For the Class 1 areas designations, EPA initiated a nationally operated monitoring network in 1987, called the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of this network is to characterize broad regional trends in visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 areas across the United States. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class 1 areas. During 1999‐2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima County, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class 1 areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12‐1. In addition to the Class 1 IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12‐1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and two collocated IMPROVE monitors at the JLG Supersite. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has been State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 34 used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve multiple objectives. In 2012, a review of the data from the Douglas Red Cross site was prepared by Air Resource Specialists and provided to ADEQ. These data will be used to evaluate if this site should be continued or if it could be better utilized at another location. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class 1 areas within the state of Arizona. Table 4.12‐1 2012 Arizona Class 1 Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond) 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban haze by conducting studies during the winter of 1989‐90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992‐93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long‐term, year‐round monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. Executive Order 2000‐3 directed by the Governor’s Brown Cloud Summit was to establish options for a visibility standard or other method to track progress in improving visibility in the Phoenix area. The Summit concluded that a daily visibility index for the metropolitan area should have its characteristics defined through a public survey process. This process called for a representative cross‐section of residents of Area A (as described in House Bill 2538, roughly the Phoenix metropolitan area), to determine what visual air qualities are desirable, what visual range is acceptable, and how often the combination of acceptable visual range and air quality is preferred. Through a series of meetings in 2002 and early 2003, ADEQ and the Visibility Index Oversight Committee designed the visibility survey, selected a contractor to conduct the survey, oversaw the completion of the field portion of the survey, and defined a recommended visibility index. The Visibility Index Oversight Committee Final Report was issued in early 2003 summarizing the visibility index. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 35 Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, and digital camera systems. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, and five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area. The Tucson urban haze network was shutdown in September 2010. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network. The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13‐1. ADEQ continues to evaluate the Urban Haze program. The high‐resolution images from these cameras can be viewed online at http://www.phoenixvis.net. Table 4.13‐1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network – Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer (Bext) (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 36 ADEQ operates meteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network; see Table 4.14‐1. Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five‐Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Currently, Ajo and Douglas Red Cross are the only meteorological sites that do not have the full suite of meteorological instruments. A temperature and/or RH probe may be added to these sites within the next year to compliment the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction. Except for the items mentioned above ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the meteorological network, but may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources permit. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network can be found in Appendix B. Table 4.14‐1 Meteorology Monitoring Network Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Ajo Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS X No Douglas Red Cross X X X No Globe Highway X X X No Hayden Old Jail X X X No JLG Supersite X X X Yes Miami Golf Course X X X No Nogales Post Office X X X No Paul Spur Chemical X X X No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 37 Comments For NCore / PAMS support Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS Comments Lime Plant Payson Well Site X X X No Queen Valley X X X Yes Rillito X X X No Vehicle Emissions Laboratory X X X Yuma Supersite X X X X X X Solar only No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 38 For PAMS support For PAMS support 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty or error. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement and population uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty relates to how accurately a pollutant’s concentration was measured, or sampled, and occurs during the data collection process. Population uncertainty relates to how well the measurements of a pollutant from a particular air monitoring station represent the population deemed at risk. Measurement uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by adhering to stringent operating requirements established by the EPA, or in‐house by ADEQ, for each specific air monitoring network. Population uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by establishing monitoring sites at the best possible location to achieve the monitoring objective. 5.1 The Quality System To ensure high quality data are produced, ADEQ maintains a quality system as required by EPA. EPA specifies the quality assurance (QA) requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix A. Components of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality system include, but are not limited to, the use of:       Quality assurance program/project plans (QAPP) with supporting standard operating procedures, Data quality objectives (DQOs) and/or data quality indicators (DQIs) that specify the amount of tolerable error and establish the precision, bias and completeness requirements for the data, Measurement quality objectives (MQO) and associated quality control (QC) checks on air monitoring instruments, Data quality assessments that provide statistical evaluation of data collected and certified annually for the specific purpose of each air monitoring station or network, A variety of regularly occurring audits, or assessments, for technical and/or management systems, and Data validation and reporting requirements that keep data comparable with other air monitoring organizations’ networks. ADEQ is the primary quality assurance organization (PQAO) for the criteria pollutant air monitors operating at ADEQ’s SLAMS and SPM network stations unless otherwise noted. The precision and bias results from QC checks such as verifications, performance evaluation (PE) audits, and national performance evaluation program audits apply to ADEQ’s data only. Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties are each designated as a PQAO by EPA Region 9 for the data they produce and the Tribal monitoring organizations work with EPA directly to establish PQAO designations for data produced on Tribal Land. ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring instruments to assess how well they achieve established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions, and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process, which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in‐house PE audits. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 39 The measurement uncertainty among ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous because such stations operate under a set of common factors needed to effectively operate as a PQAO. Common factors typically include:      Stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field standard operating procedures (SOPs), Common calibration facilities and standards, Use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPP), Oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and Support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters. 5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff The AAS QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is composed of two full‐time employees dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA team. The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA requirements are met. The QA Team primarily interacts with personnel from the AMU, which includes the Air Filter Laboratory (AFL). Detailed information on the QA Team’s activities is documented via an Annual Audit Report. The QA Team responsibilities include, but are not limited to:      Coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program or Project Plans (QAPPs). QAPPs are supported by SOPs that define how to operate air monitoring instruments, handle and process samples, and manage data. Two variations of QAPPs apply to ADEQ: o Program plans, which describe the air monitoring networks that are essentially “permanent” with no known end dates and are associated with data used for NAAQS compliance or for other national programs with specialized purposes, and o Project Plans, which describe the air monitoring stations or networks that are limited in scope and duration and are usually operated for special projects Reviewing documents such as chain‐of‐custody forms, air sample records, and various instrument performance reports that relate to DQOs and/or MQOs. Managing the field audit program, which include conducting PE audits and coordinating with the EPA national performance evaluation program auditors for PM2.5, Pb, and gaseous monitors, Conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) on ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services, and Monitoring third‐party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA or other government agencies such as the Arizona Department of Health Services. 5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents The Quality Management Plan ADEQ has an agency‐level Quality Management Plan (QMP), managed by the ADEQ Safety and Quality Management Specialist, who report to the Office of Administrative Counsel in the Administrative Services State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 40 Division. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. The Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator approved this version in November 2010. The QMP describes the management processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality system that supports programs involving environmental data and technology. The QMP is an “umbrella” document that details, in broad terms, the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities conducted by ADEQ. The Quality Assurance Program/Project Plans Per EPA Region 9 guidance, a draft comprehensive program plan was submitted to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, but this document was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual program plans, which provide more details for each major air monitoring program, or network. ADEQ develops project plans as needed for special studies, but these plans do not necessarily have to be submitted to EPA Region 9 for approval. Project plans may involve single or multi‐pollutant monitoring and they may refer to the appropriate program plan(s) for the pollutant(s) being measured to reduce duplication of effort. In 2013, personnel within the AAS are diligently working to meet EPA’s requirement of all program QAPPs updated or developed and approved by EPA Region 9 as soon as possible. EPA requires that QAPPs be updated every five years. ADEQ developed an Interim Final Pb QAPP that was approved by EPA Region 9 in October 2011 and the Final Pb QAPP was completed and approved by Region 9 in January 2013. ADEQ submitted a Final PM QAPP to Region 9 in June 2013 and Region 9 approved this QAPP in August 2013. ADEQ plans on adding any supplemental PM speciation air monitoring information as an addendum in 2014. In 2013, ADEQ plans to produce individual gaseous pollutant network QAPPs for SO2, O3, NO2, and CO. We anticipate that producing a smaller QAPP for each gaseous network will be more expedient than trying to develop a comprehensive gaseous pollutant network QAPP. EPA Region 9 approved the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, (Urban) Air Toxics Monitoring Program, & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (NATTS/ATMP/PAMS) QAPP in February 2008. This QAPP is scheduled for update and submittal in 2013 and will include the QA/QC for the meteorological network. ADEQ plans to use the pollutant‐specific QAPPs for each parameter measured at its NCore station. The EPA produces a QAPP for the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) PM2.5 monitoring program. In 2010, the QA Lead at EPA OAQPS updated the 2001 version of the speciation trends network QAPP with input from the air monitoring community. The draft of this QAPP was made available to the air monitoring community at Research Triangle Institute’s (RTI) website and is also saved on ADEQ’s shared drive with other program QAPPs. ADEQ follows the EPA QAPP for operating this network; however, any specific information regarding how ADEQ operates the two Met One samplers used for collecting these filter samples will be provided in ADEQ’s technical SOPs and addendums added to the PM QAPP regarding any specifics for this EDO. Air Monitoring SOPs for ambient air monitors are either stored at monitoring sites with storage capability or in the AMU technician’s service vehicle. Air Assessment Section SOPs are scheduled for update annually and follow State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 41 the format provided by EPA in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G‐6. SOPs are submitted for EPA Region 9 review with their relevant QAPP. The Document Control System In 2012, the DM&QA Unit produced two new administrative SOPs regarding the SOP development and document control processes. The SOPs provide guidance to personnel creating, editing, and archiving SOPs. These documents included a new alphanumeric identification system and use a centralized storage location for the electronic versions of QAPPs and SOPs. This was implemented to ensure QA documents are easily assessable for all AAS personnel and will improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining the writing and review efforts. In 2013, the DM&QA Unit produced a new administrative SOP for the corrective action program. 5.2 Measurement Quality Checks Precision, Bias, and Completeness Measurements QC checks are performed by the DM&QA Unit’s QA Auditor and generate data used to assess the quality of the ambient air data collected by AAS. As previously stated, these QC checks assess how well an air monitoring network is operating in order to quantify the amount of measurement error present in the data from field operations. EPA publishes the requirements for measurement quality checks in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A. The verifications and PE audits generate quality control data used to assess the amount of precision and bias introduced into air quality data by the monitoring process. Collocated monitors generate precision data as well. These data are reviewed regularly to determine if the quality of the ambient air data meet their intended purpose and to survey how well monitoring networks are meeting the QA requirements for precision, bias, and completeness as required in 40 CFR Part 58. The information gained from precision and bias data is important for data certification and user purposes. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40 CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants. Statistical evaluations of the QC data are available in several reports generated by the EPA’s AQS database. These reports include the AMP 255 ‐ Data Quality Indicator Report, the AMP 455 NC ‐ Quick Look All Parameters and the AMP 600 ‐ Data Certification Report. Currently, the digital flow and gas standards used by AMU and QA are annually certified, or verified, to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable standard. The standards used by QA for criteria pollutant gases are NIST‐certified annually and the O3 standards are NIST‐certified twice per year. The VOC samplers are calibrated annually by ATEC and NIST‐certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl samplers are currently calibrated annually by ATEC and NIST‐certified annually by either ATEC or ERG. For detailed information on the air monitoring instrument, or method, used at each site, see Appendix C and D. Table 5.1 shows the frequency and type of measurement quality checks performed on ADEQ monitors. 5.3 Calculations and Reporting ADEQ submits the required precision and bias report(s) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per certification guidelines and CFR requirements. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM) measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 42 Audit data for both PM and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly. ERG and RTI laboratories submit QC check information for the NATTS and CSN program, respectively. The EPA reports the NPAP and PEP QC results to AQS. ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports Periodically, EPA publishes reports for some of the criteria pollutant networks, and potentially non‐criteria pollutant networks, that rank U.S. monitoring organizations’ performance over a three year period. The QA Team as well as other personnel in DM&QA review these reports to gauge how well our networks are performing with those across the nation. If needed, corrective actions are taken to ensure data are of the highest quality possible. ADEQ is monitoring the PM2.5 network to see how it performs nationally based on the results published in the most recent EPA report, the 3‐Year Quality Assurance Report Calendar Years 2005, 2006, and 2007 The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program (February 2009). 5.4 The Audit Program Several types of quality control audits and assessments are performed on ADEQ’s air monitoring networks. ADEQ performs the PE audits as per CFR 40 Part 58 Appendix A, Section 3.2.2. For information specific to each network or pollutant, see the applicable ADEQ quality assurance program plan (QAPP). 5.4.1 Summary of Audits Conducted by ADEQ Surveillance ADEQ AAS routinely observes how well a monitor is functioning and takes timely action to mitigate any performance issues to monitoring instruments and/or networks. PE Audits In addition to ADEQ instruments, the QA Team conducts PE audits of PCAQCD monitors that are included in the interagency agreement and some source monitors. Internal Audits Technical Systems Audits (TSA) ‐ The QA Team plans on conducting a comprehensive internal TSA every three years or more frequently if needed; however, the TSA may be more focused on a particular air monitoring network(s) if changes to regulations, noted performance concerns, or emerging issues are occurring. The internal TSAs will alternate with the EPA TSA schedule. Audits of Data Quality (ADQ) ‐ The QA Team plans on conducting an ADQ twice per year. Data Quality Assessments (DQA) ‐ The DM&QA Unit Manager conducts the DQA as part of the annual data certification process. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 43 5.4.2 Summary of Audits Conducted by EPA EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have authority to audit ADEQ's ambient air monitoring program. The National Performance Evaluation Program (NPEP) The EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) at Headquarters oversee the NPEP program, which includes a number of QC evaluations. These include, but are not limited to:  Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)– for ADEQ this applies to the PM2.5 and Pb TSP monitors and analytical laboratory (Pb only),  National Performance Audit Program (NPAP) – for ADEQ this applies to the gaseous pollutant monitors, Ambient Air – Protocol Gas Verificaiton Program – for ADEQ this applies to the gaseous pollutant monitors and participation is voluntary – ADEQ participated in 2011.  Gravimetric Inter‐lab Study for PM2.5 by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory – the ADEQ Air Filter Laboratory has been voluntarily participating in this performance test since 2009. Note that ADEQ will continue to participate in the NPAP and PEP audit programs using EPA’s services versus conducting this test independently. EPA Technical Systems Audits In conformance with 40 CFR Part 58 App. A Section 2.5, EPA Region 9 conducts a TSA on ADEQ’s air monitoring program every three years and the results are reported to the AQS. EPA Region 9 most recently conducted a TSA of ADEQ’s air monitoring program in April 2012. Findings and recommendations from the TSA along with corrective action plans have been documented in a report for EPA Region 9. ADEQ is working with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2012 TSA and is constantly progressing with corrective actions since 2012. In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for EPA, and corrective actions were put in‐place for the findings and recommendations. We anticipate another NATTS TSA will take place in the future. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 44 Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations AAAD AAS AADT ADEQ AFL AMU ASARCO ATEC Auto GC/MS AQS BAM Bext Bscat CAA CBSA CEDES CFR CO CSN DCS DM&QA DQO E‐BAM EDO EPA ERG FEM FMMI FRM HAP ICP‐MS IMPROVE MCAQD MET MQO MSA μg/m3 NAAQS NAREL NATA Air Assessment Ambient Database Air Assessment Section Annual Average Daily Traffic Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Filter Lab Air Monitoring Unit American Smelting and Refining Company, LLC Atmospheric Technologies, Inc. Automated Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer Air Quality System (EPA database) Beta Attenuation Monitor Total Light Extinction Light Scattering Clean Air Act Core Based Statistical Area Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development Code of Federal Regulations Carbon Monoxide Chemical Speciation Network Data Collection System Data Management & Quality Assurance Unit Data Quality Objective Environment Proof ‐ Beta Attenuation Monitor Environmental Data Operation Environmental Protection Agency Eastern Research Group, Inc. Federal Equivalent Method Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Federal Reference Method Hazardous Air Pollutant Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments Maricopa County Air Quality Department Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) Measurement Quality Objective Metropolitan Statistical Area Micrograms per Cubic Meter National Ambient Air Quality Standard National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory National Air Toxics Assessment State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 45 NATTS NCore NIST NM NO2 NOx NOy NPAP NPEP NPS NWS O3 OAQPS PAHs PAMS Pb PCAQCD PDEQ PE PEP PM PM10 PMcoarse PM2.5 POC ppb ppm PQAO PSD PWEI QA QAPP QC QMP RASS SEMARNAT SIP SLAMS SO2 SOP SPM National Air Toxics Trends Station National Core multipollutant monitoring stations National Institute of Standards and Technology National Monument Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrogen oxides Reactive Nitrogen Oxides National Performance Audit Program National Performance Evaluation Program National Park Service National Weather Service Ozone Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Lead Pinal County Air Quality Control District Pima County Department of Environmental Quality Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Program Particulate Matter Particulate Matter ≤ 10 microns Coarse Particulate Matter between 2.5 to 10 micrometers aerodynamic diameter, may also be denoted as PM10‐2.5 Particulate Matter ≤ 2.5 microns Parameter Occurrence Code Parts Per Billion Parts Per Million Primary Quality Assurance Organization Prevention of Significant Deterioration Populated Weighted Emissions Index Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Control Quality Management Plan Radar Acoustic Sounding System Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources State Implementation Plan State and Local Air Monitoring Stations Sulfur Dioxide Standard Operating Procedure Special Purpose Monitor State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 46 SRO STN TAD TEOM TSA USFS VOC Southern Regional Office Speciation Trends Network Technical Assistance Document Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technical System Audit United States Forest Service Volatile Organic Compound State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 47 Appendix B – Network Maps There are eleven maps in this section illustrating the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:  CO Network  NO2 Network  O3 Network  SO2 Network  Pb Network  PM10 Network  PM2.5 Network  Meteorological Network  Urban Visibility Network  IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 48 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 49 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 50 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 51 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 52 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 53 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 54 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 55 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 56 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 57 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 58 Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors). Only those monitors that are in operation at the time that this network plan was created are included in this appendix. Monitors that are proposed to be installed or those that were discontinued prior to the creation of this network plan are not included in this appendix. Since individual pollutants or networks have specific monitoring or siting criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout a program or network. See Appendix D for detailed information on specific monitoring sites. NON-REGULATORY NETWORKS Meteorology Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................62 Wind...............................................................................................................................................64 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................66 NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO ..................................................................................................................................................67 NO2 ................................................................................................................................................68 O3 ...................................................................................................................................................69 SO2 .................................................................................................................................................70 Pb ...................................................................................................................................................71 PM10 ...............................................................................................................................................72 PM2.5 ..............................................................................................................................................74 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) ..................................................................................................76 National Core Multi-Pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore) ..............................................................77 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ..................................................................79 AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ........................................................................................82 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP) ..............................................................................83 VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera ...........................................................................................................................................84 Nephelometer .................................................................................................................................85 Transmissometer ............................................................................................................................86 Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................87 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................88 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 59 Definitions for Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site and the POC is the Primary Occurrence Code for the instrument, as it is in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD The AQS code representing a specific pollutant being measured or monitored Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site (Public Information, NAAQS Comparison, or Research) A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (Extreme Downwind, Highest Concentration, Max Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure, Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other) The associated monitoring network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Special Purpose, Supplemental Speciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Monitor, Unofficial PAMS) The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the network The AQS code representing the particular method for collecting samples of the specified instrument Denotes if the instrument is a Federal Reference Method, Federal Equivalency Method, Approved Regional Method (for continuous PM2.5 only), or other according to the Federal Registry Name of agency collecting data Name of laboratory performing sample analysis Name of agency reporting the data Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Date that the monitor was started at the site Frequency the instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6, etc.) Theoretical frequency for particular matter instrument based on Ratio to Standard Figure in 40CFR Part 58.12 (e.g. hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6) Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout a given year (expressed as a range of months) Distance the probe is from the ground in meters (O3 and SO2 probes must be between 2 and 15 meters; others pollutants must be between 2 to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 60 Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM For rooftop probe(s) only. The separation distance is in reference to walls, parapets, or penthouses located on roof Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction not on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest tree in meters (must be a minimum of 10 meters from drip line) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest furnace or incinerator flue in meters (for Pb and SO2; designed to avoid undue influences from minor sources) Distance between the centers of collocated instruments in meters (must be between 1 and 4 meters) Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is free from obstructions (minimum of 180°) Type of material probe is made of (SO2, NO2, O3 must have FEP Teflon or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VOCs must be borosilicate glass or stainless steel) Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds) Are there any planned changes to the monitoring in the next 18 months? (Y or N) Are the data being compared against the annual PM2.5 NAAQS standards? (Y or N) Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for manual particulate matter instrument (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for automated particulate matter instrument (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which zero/span/precision checks occur for gaseous instruments (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Date the last Performance Evaluation audit was performed on the gaseous instrument. (SO2, NO2, O3, CO, etc.) (MM/DD/YYYY) Dates of the last two audits on the particulate matter instrument flow rate. (MM/DD/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 61 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 -- Population Exposure Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/16/2012 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 04/15/2011 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 02/02/2011 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1993 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 06/08/2011 -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/11/2011 Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2 2 2 2 2 5.2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 13 3.6 12 6 6 5 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 180 300 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 62 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH continued Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp/RH (1) 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 -- -- -- -- -- -- Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Population Exposure Downwind -- -- -- -- -- -- Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Rotronics MP101A Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 040 040 040 040 040 040 -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 03/30/2010 05/11/1999 03/17/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2 2 2.4 2.4 4.5 2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 5 -- -- -- 1 Distance from trees (meters) 9 1 1.2 19 10 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 250 180 270 360 220 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 63 Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM Ajo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Population Exposure Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1969 Continuous -01/01-12/31 11.3 ---42 --360 --N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 08/06/2012 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---13 --360 --N -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Highest Concentration, Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 04/15/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ------360 --N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ------360 --N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Continuous -01/01-12/31 11.5 ---12 --360 --N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10.5 ------360 --N -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Continuous -01/01-12/31 12 ------360 --N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 64 Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind continued Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Middle 01/08/2004 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10.4 ---20 Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 05/11/1999 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 --30 50 Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 03/17/2010 Continuous -01/01-12/32 10 --33 -- -- -- -- -- -360 --N -- -360 --N -- -360 --N -- -360 --N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -- Downwind Source Oriented Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Middle 12/01/2011 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---35 Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Population Exposure -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood 05/30/1991 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ---2 -RM Young 5103 Anemometer 020 -ADEQ -ADEQ Regional 06/23/2003 Continuous -01/01-12/31 10 ----- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -360 --N -- -270 --N -- -- Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM Wind (1) 61103, 61104 -Source Oriented State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 65 Non-Regulatory - SPM Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Flagstaff Middle School PM2.5 (1) Parameter code -- -- -- -- Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Method code -- -- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Payson Well Site PM2.5 (1) Prescott College AQD PM2.5 (1) Sedona Fire Station AQD PM2.5 (1) -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 09/09/1999 05/16/2012 07/13/2011 12/16/2011 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 6 2 6 3.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 15 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 6 -- 3 Distance from trees (meters) 15 4 7 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- 270 90 250 300 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 66 NAAQS - SLAMS - CO Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) CO (1) Parameter code 42101 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Ecotech EC9830T Method code 588 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) ADEQ -ADEQ Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -2.5 Distance from trees (meters) 8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -210 Glass, Teflon 0.76 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM --Bi-Weekly 02/12/2013 -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 67 NAAQS - SLAMS - NO2 Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) NO2 (1) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model 42602 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS Ecotech EC9841B Method code 074 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FRM Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency ADEQ -ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 2.5 Distance from trees (meters) 8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -210 Glass, Teflon 0.89 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM --Bi-Weekly 06/13/2013 -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 68 NAAQS - SLAMS - O3 Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model O3 (1) Flagstaff Middle School O3 (1) O3 (1) Prescott College AQD O3 (1) O3 (1) Tonto National Monument O3 (1) 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Downwind Downwind NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS SLAMS, PAMS SLAMS Alamo Lake Regional Transport SLAMS SLAMS JLG Supersite Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Thermo 49C Queen Valley Yuma Supersite O3 (1) SLAMS Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Method code 087 087 087 047 087 087 087 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/20/2005 03/13/2008 07/01/1993 03/25/2008 01/01/1998 05/22/2002 05/06/2008 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 5 5.5 10 5 6 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- 2 -- 1 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- 4 -- -- -- -- -33 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- 2 -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 12 15 8 12 4 6 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 210 220 360 360 360 Teflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon 2.91 8.66 0.83 3.60 3.56 3.53 2.98 N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly 08/21/2012 06/19/2013 05/06/2013 06/04/2013 08/22/2012 04/25/2013 05/09/2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 69 NAAQS - SLAMS - SO2 Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Hayden Old Jail SO2 (1) JLG Supersite SO2 (1) Miami Jones Ranch SO2 (1) Miami Ridgeline SO2 (1) Miami Townsite SO2 (1) Parameter code 42401 NAAQS Comparison 42401 NAAQS Comparison 42401 NAAQS Comparison 42401 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented SLAMS 42401 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Basic monitoring objective Source Oriented Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Thermo 43C Ecotech EC9850T Method code 592 592 592 060 592 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/1975 03/03/2005 02/01/2013 10/05/1995 02/01/2013 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 5 4.5 4 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- 2 -- 2 25 Distance from trees (meters) 12 8 -- 9 15 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) 280 -- 3081 1411 2300 Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- 360 210 360 180 220 Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon 4.75 0.51 4.08 4.88 3.96 N N N Y N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly 01/23/2013 05/16/2013 07/30/2013 05/15/2013 03/19/2013 -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 70 NAAQS - SLAMS - Pb Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Globe Highway Globe Highway Pb (2) JLG Supersite Pb-PM10 (1) Miami Golf Course Pb (1) Parameter code 14129 14129 85129 14129 Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Pb (1) Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS, NCore SLAMS Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP Thermo Partisol 2000 Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP Method code 191 191 202 191 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ PCRWRD PCRWRD ERG PCRWRD Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 10/01/2010 10/01/2010 01/01/2005 10/01/2010 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Reporting Agency Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 2 2 4.67 3.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 3 5 2 -- 2 2 7 6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) 1043 1043 -- 2635 Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 2.7 2.7 -- -- 360 360 210 300 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 71 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 Ajo Bullhead City Douglas Red Cross Pollutant (POC) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) Flagstaff Middle School PM10 (1) Parameter code 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo Partisol 2000 126 FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ Local Site Name Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course PM10 (3) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS 81102 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Met One BAM 1020 FRM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ 122 SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 -- -- -- ADEQ AFL -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/11/1991 11/05/1997 09/02/1998 10/30/1996 01/06/1981 07/01/1993 7/26/2012 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Continuous Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 1:1 1:1 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:2 1:6 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 3.5 5 3 6 5 4.88 4 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- 15 -- -- -- 6 -- 10 -- -- 6 -- 40 23 11 17 12 7 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 270 360 180 300 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N Y N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -10/31/2012, 04/29/2013 -10/31/2012, 04/22/2013 -08/08/2012, 01/29/2013 -11/27/2012, 06/17/2013 -08/2/2012, 01/24/2013 05/13/2013, 02/07/2013 -07/31/2012, 03/06/2013 Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 72 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continued Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito Yuma Supersite PM10 (3) PM10 (1) PM10 (3) PM10 (1) PM10 (2) PM10 (1) PM10 (3) PM10 (3) 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 126 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo Partisol 2000 126 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 126 81102 NAAQS Comparison General/ Background SLAMS Thermo Partisol 2000 126 81102 NAAQS Comparison 81102 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Met One BAM 1020 Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB 079 Method code 122 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRM FRM FRM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 01/06/1991 01/01/1991 01/01/1991 03/16/2003 01/03/1985 12/01/2009 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous 1:6 1:6 1:6 Continuous Continuous Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 1:1 1:1 1:2 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 8 7 3 3 3 6 4.3 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 10 12 -- -- -- 3 -- -- 13 10 -- 8 8 -- 3 33 10 10 35 3 3 12 20 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 3 3 -- 2 2 -- -- -- 300 300 360 270 270 360 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N Y Y Y N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- Monthly -- Monthly -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -08/09/2012, 01/30/2013 -08/09/2012, 01/30/2013 -08/08/2012, 01/29/2013 -11/08/2012, 06/17/2013 -11/08/2012, 06/17/2013 -11/28/2012, 06/03/2013 -11/20/20012, 06/10/2013 -11/01/2012, 04/29/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 73 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5 Douglas Red Cross Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) PM2.5 (3) Parameter code 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Flagstaff Middle School PM2.5 (1) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (1) 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Thermo Partisol 2000 143 Method code 170 88101 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo Partisol 2000 143 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ AFL Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 170 -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 11/02/2000 09/09/1999 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 3 6 4.88 4.67 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- 15 -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 -- 6 6 Distance from trees (meters) 11 19 7 8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- 360 270 180 210 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N Y N N Y Y Y Y -- Monthly -- Monthly Monthly -- Monthly -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -08/08/2012, 01/29/2013 -11/27/2012, 06/17/2013 -12/05/2012, 05/13/2013 -08/15/2012, 02/07/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 74 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5 continued Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code PM2.5 (1) PM2.5 (2) PM2.5 (1) PM2.5 (3) 88101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS 88101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 143 88101 NAAQS Comparison General/ Background SLAMS Thermo Partisol 2000 143 88101 NAAQS Comparison FRM FRM FEM ADEQ Method code 170 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Yuma Supersite PM2.5 (3) 88101 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 143 Basic monitoring objective Prescott Valley Met One BAM 1020 Regional Transport SLAMS Met One BAM 1020 170 ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 12/28/2007 01/01/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 1:6 1:6 Continuous Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 8 7 7 6 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 15 10 8 3 -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 8 15 15 -- 33 12 12 7 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3, 2 2 -- -- 300 300 300 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- Monthly -- -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -08/09/2012, 01/30/2013 -08/09/2012, 01/30/2013 -08/09/2012, 01/30/2013 -11/28/2012, 06/03/2013 -11/01/2012, 04/29/2013 Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 75 NAAQS - CSN Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 Speciation (7) PM2.5 Speciation (7) Multiple Multiple Research Research Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Met One SuperSASS Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Various Various URG 3000N -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) RTI RTI Reporting Agency RTI RTI Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 1:3 1:3 Collecting Agency Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 4.60 4.80 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 10 Distance from trees (meters) 12 12 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- 230 230 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N -- -- Monthly Monthly -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- 08/30/2012, 02/26/2013 08/30/2012, 02/26/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 76 NAAQS - NCore Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite CO (1) NOy (1) JLG Supersite O3 (1) JLG Supersite SO2 (1) JLG Supersite Pb-PM10 (1) JLG Supersite PM10-2.5 (1) Parameter code 42101 42600 44201 42401 85129 86101 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Research Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Population Exposure Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech 9843 NCore Teledyne API 400E Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore NCore Ecotech EC9850T Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020 Method code 588 591 087 592 202 185 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- ERG -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 03/03/2005 01/01/2005 11/10/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Continuous Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 10 5 5 4.67 4.88 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.5 -- 2 2 2 6 Distance from trees (meters) 8 5 8 8 7 7 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 210 210 210 210 210 180 Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon -- -- 0.76 13.08 0.83 0.51 -- -- N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- -- 02/12/2013 08/15/2012 05/16/2013 05/16/2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 77 NAAQS - NCore continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 (3) PM2.5 (1) 88101 88101 NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model JLG Supersite JLG Supersite PM2.5 Speciation (7) PM2.5 Speciation (7) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Multiple Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 Research Research -- -- Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Population Exposure Population Exposure -- -- URG 3000N Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 Population Exposure Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Population Exposure Supplemental Speciation, NCore Met One SuperSASS Method code 170 143 Various Various 040 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Collecting Agency -- ADEQ AFL RTI RTI -- -- ADEQ ADEQ RTI RTI ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 Continuous Continuous Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 4.88 4.67 4.60 4.80 2 11.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 6 6 10 10 -- -- Probe height (meters) Distance from trees (meters) 7 8 12 12 6 12 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 180 210 230 230 180 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N Y Y -- -- -- -- -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- 12/05/2012, 05/13/2013 08/15/2012, 02/07/2013 08/30/2012, 02/26/2013 08/30/2012, 02/26/2013 -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 78 NAAQS - PAMS Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite CO (1) NOx (1) O3 (1) Carbonyl (30,31) Carbonyl (32) VOC (6) Parameter code 42101 42603 44201 Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Max Precursor Impact QA Collocated Max Precursor Impact PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS Teledyne API 400E ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 126 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Population Exposure Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech EC9841B Research PAMS NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Method code 588 090 087 202 202 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) -- -- -- ERG ERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ERG ERG Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Every other month 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 Probe height (meters) 5 5 5 4.55 4.55 4.55 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.5 2.5 2 8 8 8 Distance from trees (meters) 8 8 8 6 6 6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Probe material for reactive gases Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM 210 210 210 210 210 210 Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Stainless Steel 0.76 0.89 0.83 -- -- -- N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- -- -- 02/12/2013 06/13/2013 05/06/2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 79 NAAQS - PAMS continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen Valley Queen Valley Queen Valley VOC (7) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) O3 (1) NOy (1) VOC (6) Parameter code Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 44201 42600 Multiple Research Research Downwind Downwind Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Research -- -- NAAQS Comparison QA Collocated Population Exposure Population Exposure Downwind SLAMS, PAMS PAMS PAMS Teledyne API 400E Thermo 42C TL Reactive ATEC 8001 126 PAMS, NATTS -- -- ATEC 2200 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer 126 040 020 087 574 -- -- -- FEM FEM -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG -- -- -- -- ERG Reporting Agency ERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 Every other month Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4.55 2 11.5 5 10 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8 -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 6 6 12 4 4 4 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 210 180 360 360 360 360 Stainless Steel Probe material for reactive gases Stainless Steel -- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- 3.56 13.8 -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- 08/22/2012 08/22/2012 -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 80 NAAQS - PAMS continued Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Queen Valley Queen Valley Vehicle Emissions Lab Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Delta Temp (1) 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 -- -- Downwind Vehicle Emissions Lab Horizontal Solar Raditation (1) Vehicle Emissions Lab Ultraviolet Solar Radiation (1) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Temp R/H (1) Wind (1) 62101, 61202 63301 63302, 63304 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 Research Research Research -- -- Downwind Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure PAMS PAMS PAMS -- -RM Young 5305 Anemometer 020 -- -- Vaisala HMP 45C Probe RM Young 5103 Anemometer RM Young 7627 Li-Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR UV Rotronics MP101A Probe 040 020 810 011 011 040 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Neighborhood Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 2.4 10 2.5 - 10 5 5 4.5 10 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 Distance from trees (meters) 1.2 -- 10 10 10 10 50 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 180 360 360 360 360 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 81 Air Toxics -NATTS Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple JLG Supersite PM10 metals speciation (1) Multiple Carbonyl (6) Carbonyl (7) VOC (6) VOC (7) SVOC (6) Research Research Research Research Research Research Population Exposure QA Collocated Population Exposure QA Collocated PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS Population Exposure Population Exposure NATTS NATTS ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 ATEC 2200 Tisch TE-1000BL Thermo Partisol 2000 202 202 101 101 118 202 -- -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Reporting Agency ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 06/06/2001 06/06/2001 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 1:6 Every other month 1:6 Every other month 1:6 1:6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4.55 4.55 4.55 4.55 3.86 4.67 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8 8 2 8 5 9 Distance from trees (meters) 6 6 6 6 5 9 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- 210 210 210 210 210 210 -- Probe material for reactive gases Teflon Teflon Stainless Steel Stainless Steel -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Monthly -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 08/15/2012, 02/07/2013 Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 82 Air Toxics - UATMP Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) South Phoenix Parameter code Multiple Basic monitoring objective VOC (6) Monitor type(s) Research Population Exposure UATMP Instrument manufacturer and model ATEC 8001 Site type(s) Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency 101 -ADEQ ERG ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 8/5/2001 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 1:12 -01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 2 Distance from trees (meters) 10 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 250 Probe material for reactive gases -Stainless Steel Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- ----- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 83 Visibility - Urban Haze - Camera Visibility (1) Banner Mesa Medical Center Visibility (1) -- -- ADEQ Building Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Estrella Mountain Estrella Mountain Community College Community College Visibility (1) Visibility (2) -- -- North Mountain Summit Visibility (1) -- Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Population Population Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure Exposure Exposure -----CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel CANON EOS Rebel T2i T2i T2i T2i T2i ------- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2002 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 84 Visibility - Urban Haze - Nephelometer Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Dysart Estrella Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Parameter code -- -- -- Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer -- Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer -- Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer -- Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 06/25/2003 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- 5 10 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- 360 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 85 Visibility - Urban Haze - Transmissometer Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Parameter code Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Bext (1) Bext (1) -- -- Public Information Public Information Population Exposure Population Exposure -- -- Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Receiver Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Method code -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/1992 12/01/1992 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 30 27 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 5 -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- 240 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 86 Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RH Dysart Estrella Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Local Site Name Pollutant (POC) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Parameter code 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 -- -- -- Basic monitoring objective Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Collecting Agency Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency -- -- -- Rotronics MP101A Probe Rotronics MP101A Probe Rotronics MP101A Probe 040 040 040 -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ -- -- -- ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/16/2003 02/11/2003 01/01/1994 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 32 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- 10 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) -- 5 -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- 360 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- Y Y Y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 87 Visibility - IMPROVE Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp Grand Canyon National Park Indian Gardens Greer Water Treatment Plant Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Meadview Pollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE Parameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Background Other Background Background Other Other Other Other Background IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Local Site Name Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS ADEQ NPS NPS NFS UC Davis ADEQ ADEQ NFS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/02/1988 06/02/2004 09/24/1997 10/01/1989 02/29/2000 04/02/2000 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 09/04/1991 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4 3 -- 4 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- 2 1.5 1 -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 8 -- -- -- 5 10 10 -- Distance from trees (meters) Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) 10 6 -- 6 50 23 10 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 4 -360 Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 -- 300 360 360 220 220 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N Y N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- 01/29/2013 -- -- 09/11/2012 11/07/2012 10/30/2012 10/30/2012 06/05/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 88 Visibility - IMPROVE - continued Petrified Forest National Park Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Queen Valley Local Site Name Organ Pipe National Monument Saguaro National Park East Pollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE Parameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Saguaro National Sycamore Canyon Park West Tonto National Monument IMPROVE Other Background Other Other Background Other Background Background IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS NPS NFS ADEQ NPS NPS ADEQ / UC Davis NPS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacturer and model Method code Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) Reporting Agency Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/15/2003 03/02/1988 02/10/2000 04/30/2001 06/04/1988 04/19/2001 09/11/1991 04/23/1988 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) Probe height (meters) 4 4 5 6 -- 4 4 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.5 -- 1.5 2.5 -- 1.5 1.5 1.5 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- 73 -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 12 -- 20 5 -- 15 15 8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360 360 360 360 -- 360 360 360 Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM samplers Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments N N N N N N N N -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 05/08/2013 -- 03/07/2013 02/13/2013 -- 07/18/2012 09/04/2012 06/11/2013 Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 89 Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All current sites and those closed after July 1, 2012 are included in this appendix. Sites that were closed after July 1, 2012 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section. This appendix also contains general information about the air quality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for more detailed information on specific monitors and networks. AQS ID 04-019-0001 04-012-8000 04-015-1003 04-003-8001 04-003-1005 04-013-4010 04-013-8005 04-005-1008 04-007-1002 04-005-8102 04-005-8101 04-001-8001 04-007-1001 04-025-8104 04-013-9997 04-015-9000 04-007-8000 04-007-0011 04-007-0009 04-007-0012 04-023-0004 04-019-0005 04-003-0011 04-007-0008 04-001-0012 04-007-8100 04-025-8033 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 21737 16316 34961 19489 16365 16679 16503 19550 16506 21736 16707 16593 16682 16683 16323 16326 16421 16328 21298 16629 16631 16382 16632 16511 16480 16681 16391 16317 16473 16829 16330 16446 133011 18392 SITE NAME ADEQ Building Ajo Alamo Lake Banner Mesa Medical Center Bullhead City Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Dysart Estrella Estrella Mountain Community College Flagstaff Middle School Globe Highway Grand Canyon National Park – Hance Camp Grand Canyon National Park – Indian Garden Greer Water Treatment Plant Hayden Old Jail Ike’s Backbone JLG Supersite Meadview Miami Golf Course Miami Jones Ranch Miami Ridgeline Miami Townsite Nogales Post Office North Mountain Summit Organ Pipe National Monument Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Petrified Forest National Park Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Prescott College AQD Prescott Valley State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 90 PAGE 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 115 116 117 118 119 120 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 AQS ID 04-021-8001 04-019-0020 04-019-0021 04-019-9000 04-013-4003 04-005-8103 04-007-0010 04-013-9998 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 16394 16499 16474 16475 142818 16377 16476 16447 16363 11319 SITE NAME Queen Valley Rillito Saguaro National Park East Saguaro National Park West Sedona Fire Station AQD South Phoenix Sycamore Canyon Tonto National Monument Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 91 PAGE 132 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 143 Definitions for Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Local Site Name Site Narrative Site Information AQS ID ADEQ ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to Roadways Traffic Count Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Site Established Date Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Brief summary of the site location and surroundings Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database Unique identifier from the AZURITE / AAAD database for each monitoring site Physical Street Address or cross streets of the monitoring site Arizona county the monitor is located within Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Description of area around monitoring site (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, desert, forest, mobile, blighted area, and military reservation) Distance and direction from the edge of the roadway to the instrument in meters ADOT supplied traffic count for the nearest major roadway (data obtained in 2010) Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement, rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.) The North/South geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The East/West geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The vertical distance above sea level of the site in meters Date site was first used as a monitoring site Monitoring Information Pollutant The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site Basic monitoring Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site (Public Information, objective NAAQS Comparison, or Research.) Site type(s) A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (Extreme Downwind, Highest Concentration, Max Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure, Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other) Monitor type(s) The associated monitoring network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Special Purpose, Supplemental Speciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Monitor, Unofficial PAMS) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 92 Monitor Start Date Instrument manufacture and model Site Photos Aerial View Site View Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the network Image of site and the surrounding area (using Google Earth) Most current photo of monitors at the site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 93 ADEQ Building The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of the building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 84 m – S Elevation 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 21737 Rooftop 33.4483 -112.0878 329 m 07/01/2002 Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 07/01/2002 Site Photos Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 94 Ajo The site is located at the Pima County Maintenance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest structure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lie the stabilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo mining operation that closed in 1985. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 109 m – E Elevation 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16316 Gravel 32.3820 -112.8575 515 m 07/01/1969 Monitoring Information PM10 Wind NAAQS -Comparison Population Population Exposure Exposure SLAMS -Thermo RM Young TEOM 5305 1400AB Anemometer Neighborhood Neighborhood 02/11/1991 07/01/1969 Site Photos Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 05/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 95 Alamo Lake The site was established to replace the Hillside site and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49 km north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter. More monitors will be added at this site over the next year as it becomes a designated background site. Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID Street Address Alamo Lake State Park County La Paz Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to roadway 30 m – E Elevation Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date 34961 Gravel 34.2439 -113.5586 403 m 05/20/2005 Monitoring Information Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date O3 NAAQS Comparison Regional Transport SLAMS Teledyne API 400E Regional 05/20/2005 Site Photos Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the east – 08/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 96 Banner Mesa Medical Center The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 20 m – N Elevation 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 19489 Rooftop 33.4335 -111.8428 454 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 01/01/1993 Site Photos Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center Banner Mesa Medical Center Camera– 05/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 97 Bullhead City The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429 Mohave Groundcover Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude ~30 m – W Elevation 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16365 Rooftop 35.1539 -114.5661 156 m 11/01/1997 Monitoring Information PM10 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS Thermo TEOM 1400AB Neighborhood 11/05/1997 Site Photos Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office– 06/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 98 Chiricahua Entrance Station The site is operated by the NPS. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3.8 km to the northeast. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Desert Longitude 99 m – E Elevation 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16679 Dirt/Rocks 32.0094 -109.3891 1,570 m 01/01/1988 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 99 Douglas Red Cross The site is located at the Red Cross building on the south side of 15th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS database, a second AQS ID was created (04-003-9000) for IMPROVE data. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID 1445 E. 15th St. Douglas, AZ 85607 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 30 m – N Elevation th 2,320 – 14 St. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information PM10 PM2.5 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Met One BAM Vaisala HMP TEOM 1020 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 08/16/2012 16503 Dirt/Grass 31.3492 -109.5396 1,231 m 09/01/1998 Wind -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 08/06/2012 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 06/02/2004 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 100 Site Photos Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 101 Dysart The site is located in the Maricopa County Facility Maintenance Yard at the southeast corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 14 m – W Elevation 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 19550 Gravel 33.6370 -112.3393 357 m 01/01/2003 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Rotronics Optec NGN 2 MP101A Nephelometer Probe Urban Urban 01/01/2003 07/16/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 03/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 102 Estrella The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estrella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Desert/Recreation Area Longitude 258 m – N Elevation 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16506 Grass/Gravel 33.3833 -112.3728 277 m 01/01/1995 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Rotronics Optec NGN 2 MP101A Nephelometer Probe Urban Urban 01/01/2003 02/11/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 06/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 103 Estrella Mountain Community College One high-resolution digital camera points to the Estrella Mountains, which lies 11 km to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 155 m – S Elevation 7,280 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 21736 Rooftop 33.4836 -112.3503 305 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Visibility Public Public Information Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --CANON EOS CANON EOS Rebel T2i Rebel T2i Urban Urban 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 104 Flagstaff Middle School The site is west of Bonito Road on the rooftop of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east. At the end of 2013 the O3, and the PM10, and PM2.5 Partisols, will be removed from this site. Only the PM2.5 E-BAM unit will remain at the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Residential Longitude 70 m – E Elevation 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information O3 PM10 NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Max O3 Population Concentration Exposure PM2.5 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Teledyne API 400E Neighborhood 03/13/2008 Thermo Partisol 2000 Neighborhood 10/30/1996 Thermo Partisol 2000 Neighborhood 09/09/1999 16707 Rooftop 35.2061 -111.6528 2,120 m 10/29/1996 PM2.5 Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 09/09/1999 Site Photos Aerial view of Flagstaff Middle School Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff Middle School – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 105 Globe Highway This site is the location of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ. ASARCO mine also maintains a SO2 analyzer, Pb sampler, PM sampler, wind monitor, rain gage, and temp/RH at the site. The site is located on the southwest end of a small canyon and is located approximately 1 km to the east/southeast of the ASARCO smelting facility. Due to its proximity to the end of the canyon, the site may be influenced by both broad and local meteorological conditions. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Street Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude Distance to roadway 5m–W Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16593 Gravel 33.002 -110.765 602 m 01/01/1975 Monitoring Information Pb Temp/RH Wind NAAQS --Comparison Highest Highest Highest Concentration, Concentration, Concentration, Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS --RM Young Tisch TEVaisala HMP 5305 8550-BL TSP 155 Probe Anemometer Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 07/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 106 Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Desert Longitude 200 m – E Elevation 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16682 Dirt 35.9731 -111.9841 2,235 m 09/24/1997 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/24/1997 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 107 Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Gardens The site is owned by the NPS. The site is located in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the south side of the canyon along the Bright Angel Trail. Due to budgetary constraints this site will be closed by the end of 2013. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID Bright Angel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Desert Longitude 8,047 m – S Elevation 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16683 Dirt/Rocks 36.0778 -112.1289 1,183 m 10/01/1989 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 10/01/1989 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 108 Greer Water Treatment Plant The site is located in the Apache National Forest and is operated the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4 km to the south/southwest. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927 Apache Groundcover None Latitude Forest Longitude 1,600 m – N Elevation 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16323 Grass 34.0583 -109.4400 2,503 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 02/29/2000 Site Photos Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 109 Hayden Old Jail The site is located in a shelter next to the old Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved to a shelter next to the jail due to safety and siting concerns in 2010. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the ASARCO smelting facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site in the old jail building. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID Street Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to roadway 5m–E Elevation Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information SO2 PM10 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Ecotech Vaisala HMP TEOM EC9850T 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 16326 Shelter 33.0062 -110.7864 625 m 01/01/1969 Wind -Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail shelter and meteorological tower – 05/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 110 Ike’s Backbone The site is operated by the USFS. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas. The site is located on a small ridge with the Verde River and mountains nearby. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544 Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Forest Longitude -111.6825 n/a Elevation 1,303 m 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/02/2000 Site Photos IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone – 2011 Regional view of Ike’s Backbone State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 111 JLG Supersite The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily residential neighborhoods, with I-17 approximately 1.6 km to the west. This is also an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID 4530 N. 17th Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 8.5 m – E Elevation 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information CO NO2 / NOx NOy NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison. Comparison Comparison Research Highest Highest Concentration, Population Concentration Population Exposure Exposure SLAMS, SLAMS, NCore NCore, PAMS PAMS Ecotech Ecotech Ecotech 9843 EC9830T EC9841B Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 Monitoring Information SO2 Carbonyl VOC NAAQS Research Research Comparison Population Population Population Exposure, Max Exposure, Max Exposure Precursor Precursor Impact Impact SLAMS, PAMS, PAMS, NCore NATTS NATTS Ecotech ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 EC9850T Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/03/2005 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 16328 Gravel 33.5038 -112.0957 354 m 07/01/1993 O3 NAAQS Comparison Max O3 Concentration SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Teledyne API 400E Neighborhood 07/01/1993 SVOC Research Population Exposure NATTS Tisch TE1000BL Neighborhood 07/08/2007 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 112 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information Pb-PM10 / PM10 metals PM10 PM10-2.5 speciation NAAQS NAAQS Comparison, Research Comparison Research Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure SLAMS, NCore, SLAMS NCore NATTS Thermo Met One BAM Met One BAM Partisol 2000 1020 1020 Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/2005 07/01/1993 11/10/2010 Monitoring Information PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Speciation Speciation NAAQS Research Research Comparison Population Population Population Exposure Exposure Exposure Supplemental Supplemental SLAMS, Speciation, Speciation, NCore NCore NCore Thermo Met One URG 3000N Partisol 2000 SuperSASS Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 Monitoring Information Wind IMPROVE -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 07/01/1993 PM2.5 NAAQS Comparison Population Exposure SLAMS, NCore Met One BAM 1020 Neighborhood 07/01/2003 Temp/RH -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 07/01/1993 IMPROVE Research Research Other Other IMPROVE IMPROVE -- -- Neighborhood 04/25/2001 Neighborhood 04/25/2001 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 113 Site Photos Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite two shelters, roof top, and meteorological tower – 08/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 114 Meadview The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the north end of Meadview, AZ, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingman. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444 Mohave Groundcover Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Desert/Residential Longitude 100 m – E Elevation 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 21298 Gravel 36.0193 -114.0684 902 m 09/04/1991 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/04/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview shelter – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 115 Miami Golf Course This site is the location of the TSP-Pb monitor in Miami, AZ. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc also maintains two particulate matter monitors at the site. The site is located near the Cobre Valley Country Club with residential areas to the south and east and the Freeport McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 230 – E Elevation n/a Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information Pb PM10 Temp/RH NAAQS NAAQS -Comparison Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS SLAMS -Thermo Tisch TEVaisala HMP TEOM 8550-BL TSP 155 Probe 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 10/01/2010 7/26/2012 06/08/2011 16629 Gravel 33.4190 -110.8296 1000 m 01/01/1997 Wind -Source Oriented -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 07/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 116 Miami Jones Ranch This site is one of three SO2 sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc operate a SO2 instrument at this site as well. The site is located south of the town of Miami and is over 3 km south/southwest of the smelter. The site located in the desert hills over looking the town and is off a gravel/dirt road. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0011 ADEQ ID Cherry Flats Rd. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude n/a Elevation n/a Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16631 Gravel 33.3853 -110.8673 1,242 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information SO2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Neighborhood 02/01/2013 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Jones Ranch Fenced Miami Jones Ranch site – 03/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 117 Miami Ridgeline This is one of three SO2 site in the Miami area. The site is located inside on private property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ridge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintain a PM10 monitor at the site. The Freeport McMoRan smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 40 m – N Elevation 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16382 Dirt 33.3992 -110.8589 1,085 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information SO2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Thermo 43C Neighborhood 10/05/1995 Site Photos Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 05/2012 Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 118 Miami Townsite This site is one of three SO2 sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc run a SO2 instrument at this site as well. This site is located on the western side of Miami, near the center of the town. There is a church to the west and a Police Station to the west with residential to the north and south. The road is located to the south of the site. The smelter is over 2 km to the northwest of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0012 ADEQ ID Sullivan ST & Davis Canyon Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 16.5 m - SE Elevation 470 – Sullivan St Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16382 Gravel 33.3973 -110.8744 1,042 m 0/01/1997 Monitoring Information SO2 NAAQS Comparison Source Oriented SLAMS Ecotech EC9850T Neighborhood 02/01/2013 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Townsite Fenced Miami Townsite – 05/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 119 Nogales Post Office The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Border. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. This site is used to meet the PM2.5 collocation requirement. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621 Santa Cruz Groundcover Nogales Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 14 m – NW Elevation 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information PM10 PM10 PM2.5 NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Comparison Population Population Highest Exposure Exposure Concentration SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS Met One BAM Thermo Met One BAM 1020 Partisol 2000 1020 Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 16511 Rooftop 31.3372 -110.9367 1,176 m 01/01/1980 PM2.5 NAAQS Comparison Highest Concentration QA Collocated Thermo Partisol 2000 Neighborhood 04/01/1999 Monitoring Information Temp/RH Wind -- -- Population Exposure -- Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 08/11/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 120 Site Photos Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteorological monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 121 North Mountain Summit The site is located on a mountaintop in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera faces South Mountain, which lies 27 km to the south. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet athttp://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx. The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with some commercial activity to the south and east. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 16480 West side of 7th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722 850 m – E Elevation 625 m th 28,210 – 7 St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information Visibility Public Information Population Exposure -CANON EOS Rebel T2i Urban 01/01/1993 Site Photos Aerial view of North Mountain Summit Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 122 Organ Pipe National Monument The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1 km south/southwest of the national monument visitor center, which is about 35.4 km south of Why, AZ. The site is about seven meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mountain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Desert Longitude 400 m – E Elevation 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16681 Gravel 31.9499 -112.8010 505 m 01/01/1971 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 01/15/2003 Site Photos Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 05/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 123 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. In 2011 the meteorological instruments were re-located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site was closed. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, the surrounding area is predominately desert. The Chemical Lime Plant is not operational at this time. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Desert Longitude 50 m – S Elevation 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16391 Dirt 31.3658 -109.7309 1,278 m 01/01/1985 Monitoring Information PM10 Temp/RH Wind NAAQS --Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS --Thermo RM Young Vaisala HMP TEOM 5305 155 Probe 1400AB Anemometer Middle Middle Middle 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP – 03/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 124 Payson Well Site The site is located in the southern area of Payson, at a water well site. To the southeast of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use. Directly to the west, on the other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290 meters to the east is SR 87. This site is currently used to meet the PM10 collocation requirement. This site will be moved west to a more open area on the water well property within the next year and PM10 BAM instrument will replace the Partisol instrument. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 80 m – S Elevation 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information PM10 PM2.5 NAAQS Public Comparison Information Population Population Exposure Exposure SLAMS Special Purpose Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 01/01/1991 Neighborhood 05/16/2012 16317 Gravel 34.2294 -111.3297 1,501 m 01/01/1991 Temp/RH Wind -- -- Population Exposure -- Population Exposure -RM Young Vaisala HMP 5103 45C Probe Anemometer Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/30/1991 05/30/1991 Site Photos Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and particulate monitor on platform – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 125 Petrified Forest National Park The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1.6 km north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surrounding area is desert. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ Apache Groundcover Dirt None Latitude 35.0770 Desert Longitude -109.7690 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988 Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 126 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holiday Inn Hotel near 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 3600 N. 2nd Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 25 m – E Elevation 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 16829 Rooftop 33.4901 -112.0767 337 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Temp R/H Public -Information Population Population Exposure Exposure --Optec LVP-2 Rotronics Transmissometer MP101A Receiver Probe Urban Urban 12/01/1992 01/01/1994 Site Photos Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 12/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 127 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn Hotel 4.5 km to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 120 m – S Elevation 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date 16330 Rooftop 33.5253 -112.1019 340 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Public Information Population Exposure -Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Urban 12/01/1992 Site Photos Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pathway – 2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 128 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station The site is operated by USFS. The site is located on a hilltop south of Young, AZ, within the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest. The surrounding area is a transitional zone between desert and forest. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Desert/Forest Longitude 250 m – N Elevation 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16446 Dirt 34.0908 -110.9419 1,587 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 02/10/2000 Site Photos Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 09/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 129 Prescott College AQD The site is located at Prescott College on the rooftop of the Mogollon Building (#307). The surrounding area is residential and commercial, with a high traffic street approximately 20 meters to the east and large trees to the west. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Yavapai Groundcover Prescott Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 8m–E Elevation 17,650 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 133011 Rooftop 34.5467 -112.4761 1,591 m 12/05/2006 Monitoring Information O3 PM2.5 NAAQS Public Comparison Information Max O3 Population Concentration Exposure Special SLAMS Purpose Met One Thermo 49C E-BAM Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/25/2008 07/13/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD – 06/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 130 Prescott Valley The site is located on the Prescott Police Department building about 1,100 meters to the north of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly residential with some areas of open desert. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 7601 E. Civic Cir. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 Yavapai Groundcover Prescott Latitude Desert/Residential Longitude 25 m – S Elevation 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 18392 Rooftop 34.5950 -112.3310 1,556 m 03/12/2003 Monitoring Information PM10 PM2.5 NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison General / General / Background Background SLAMS SLAMS Thermo Thermo Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/16/2003 12/28/2007 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott Police Department – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 131 Queen Valley The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small town of Queen Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primarily desert. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219 Pinal Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Desert Longitude 87 m – W Elevation 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information O3 NOy NAAQS Research Comparison Downwind Downwind SLAMS, PAMS PAMS Teledyne API Thermo 42C 400E TL Reactive Regional Regional 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 16394 Gravel 33.2938 -111.2857 668 m 01/01/1998 VOC Temp/RH Research -- Downwind Downwind PAMS -- ATEC 8001 Regional 05/20/2001 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Regional 06/23/2003 Monitoring Information Wind IMPROVE -- Research Downwind -RM Young 5103 Anemometer Regional 06/23/2003 Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/30/2001 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 132 Site Photos Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter and meteorological tower at Queen Valley site – 02/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 133 Rillito In February of 2007 the site was moved from the Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping station. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 meters to the northeast. The site is located within the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximately 500 meters to the north/northwest of the Cal Portland Rillito Cement Plant. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Residential Longitude 7m–S Elevation 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16499 Dirt 32.4143 -111.1545 626 m 01/01/1985 Monitoring Information PM10 Temp/RH Wind NAAQS --Comparison Source Source Source Oriented Oriented Oriented SLAMS --Thermo RM Young Vaisala HMP TEOM 5103 45C Probe 1400AB Anemometer Middle Middle Middle 01/03/1985 03/30/2010 01/08/2004 Site Photos Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 04/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 134 Saguaro National Park East The site is located within the Saguaro National Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730 Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Residential/Desert Longitude 82 m – W Elevation 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16474 Dirt 32.1740 -110.7360 938 m 06/04/1988 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 06/04/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 135 Saguaro National Park West The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by the NPS. The area surrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 km southwest of I-10. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ Pima Groundcover Tucson Latitude Desert Longitude 27 m – W Elevation 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16475 Gravel 32.2485 -111.2175 718 m 12/29/1996 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Other IMPROVE -Regional 04/19/2001 Site Photos Shelters at Saguaro NP West site – 07/2012 Regional view of Saguaro NP West State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 136 Sedona Fire Station AQD In 2011, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was moved from the Sedona Post Office site to the Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emissions affecting the monitor. The Sedona Fire Station site is located approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona Post Office site. The surrounding area is composed of residential and commercial use. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 310 Forest Rd, Sedona, AZ 86336 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude n/a Elevation n/a Site Established Date 142818 Rooftop 34.8683 -111.7633 1,326 m 12/16/2011 Monitoring Information Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date PM2.5 Public Information Population Exposure Special Purpose Met One E-BAM Neighborhood 12/16/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Sedona Fire Station E-BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station – 3/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 137 South Phoenix The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are located north and west of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 83 m – W Elevation 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16377 Asphalt 33.4030 -112.0750 330 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information VOC Research Population Exposure UATMP ATEC 8001 Neighborhood 8/5/2001 Site Photos Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 138 Sycamore Canyon The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area surrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond) Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Forest Longitude 33 m – NW Elevation 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16476 Dirt/Grass 35.1406 -111.9692 2,046 m 09/11/1991 Monitoring Information IMPROVE Research Background IMPROVE -Regional 09/11/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 139 Tonto National Monument The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National Forest at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roosevelt Lake about 1 km to the north. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Desert Longitude 17 m – NE Elevation 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date 16447 Dirt/Rock 33.6547 -111.1074 786 m 04/23/1988 Monitoring Information O3 IMPROVE NAAQS Research Comparison Downwind Background SLAMS IMPROVE Teledyne API -400E Regional Regional 05/22/2002 04/23/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 08/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 140 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both residential and commercial, with an open field directly to the northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202). AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID 600 N. 40th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 66 m – E Elevation th 12,740 – 40 St. Site Established Date 16363 Gravel 33.4553 -111.9961 356 m 04/01/1987 Monitoring Information Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Public Information Population Exposure -Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Urban 06/25/2003 Delta Temp Horizontal Solar Raditation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Research Research Research Population Exposure PAMS RM Young 7627 Neighborhood 08/20/2004 Population Exposure PAMS Population Exposure PAMS Epply TUVR UV Neighborhood 08/20/2004 Li-Cor 200S2 Neighborhood 06/18/1999 Monitoring Information Temp R/H Wind -- -- Population Exposure -Rotronics MP101A Probe Neighborhood 05/11/1999 Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 05/11/1999 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 141 Site Photos Aerial view of Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 12/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 142 Yuma Supersite The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air quality monitors in the Yuma area to one site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility property. The surrounding area is commercial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 km to the northeast. In addition to NAAQS compliance, the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone. AQS ID Street Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to roadway Traffic count Site Information 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364 Yuma Groundcover Yuma Latitude Commercial/Industrial Longitude 91 m – W Elevation 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Pollutant Basic monitoring objective Site type(s) Monitor type(s) Instrument manufacture and model Spatial scale Monitor Start Date Monitoring Information O3 PM10 PM2.5 NAAQS NAAQS NAAQS Comparison Comparison Comparison Max O3 Population Regional Concentration Exposure Transport SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Thermo Teledyne API Met One BAM TEOM 400E 1020 1400AB Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 113219 Rooftop 32.6903 -114.6144 60 m 02/01/2006 Temp/RH -Population Exposure -Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Neighborhood 03/17/2010 Monitoring Information Wind -Population Exposure -RM Young 5305 Anemometer Neighborhood 03/17/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 143 Site Photos Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Meteorological Tower at Yuma Supersite – 11/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 144 Appendix E – Criteria Pollutant Minimum Monitoring Requirements This appendix contains tables that summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO). Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not included within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 145 O3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Table D-2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O3. 2010-2012 # of Required # of Active 8-hr Design Design Value Site Monitors Monitors Value (ppb) Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 69 Flagstaff Middle School 1 1 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 69 Prescott College AQD 1 1 Yuma Yuma 195,751 77 Yuma Supersite 1 1 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, and Tonto National Monument. _________________________________________________________________________ MSA County 2010 Census Population # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 PM2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 and Table D-5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 2a Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM2.5 SLAMS. (FRM/FEM/ARM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.1 and Table D-5) 2010-2012 2010-2012 # of Annual Daily # of Active Annual Daily Design Required 2010 Census MSA County Design Value Design Continuous Design Value Site Continuous Population Site Value Monitors Value Monitors (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 12 0 1 Middle School Middle School Prescott Prescott Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.0 9 0 1 Valley Valley Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 15 0 1 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Kingman Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office. Table 2b Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non-FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.2) 2010-2012 2010-2012 # of Annual # of Active Annual Daily Daily Design Required 2010 Census MSA County Design Value Continuous Design Design Value Site Continuous Population Site Monitors Value Value Monitors (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 12 0 1* Middle School Middle School Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.0 Prescott Valley 9 Prescott Valley 0 1* Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 15 0 1 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 Kingman * Continuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMs, or ARMs Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office. _________________________________________________________________________ # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed PM10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Table D-4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM10. MSA County 2010 Census 2010-2012 Max Population Concentration [μg/m3] 134,421 61 Max Concentration Site Flagstaff Middle School # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 1 0 Flagstaff Coconino Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 274 Yuma Supersite 1-2 1 0 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 185 Bullhead City 0-1 1 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas Red Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Golf Course, Miami Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite. _________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 146 0 0 0 0 NO2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO2. CBSA 2010 Census 2009 Population Max AADT Counts Flagstaff 134,421 # of Required Near-road Monitors # of Active Near-road Monitors # of Additional Near-road Monitors Needed # of Required Area-wide Monitors # of Active Area-wide Monitors # of Additional Area-wide Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,500 Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None _________________________________________________________________________ 0 0 0 SO2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO2. CBSA County 2010 Census Population Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 539 Population Weighted Emissions Index2 [million persons-tons per year] 70 2008 Total SO21 [tons/year] # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors 0 0 # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2272 490 0 0 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 185 36 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman Mohave 200,186 319 62 0 0 0 1 Using NEI data 2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO2 and dividing product by one million Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline. EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None _________________________________________________________________________ CO (Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for CO. CBSA 2010 Census # of Required Population Near-Road Monitors # of Active Near-Road Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0 Prescott 211,033 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None _____________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 147 Pb (Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore. NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census Population JLG Supersite Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale 4,192,887 # of Required Monitors 1 # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 1 0 Table 7b. Source-Oriented Pb Monitoring (including airports) Source Name Address Pb Emissions Emission Max 3-Month (tons per Inventory Design year) Source & Value* Data Year [μg/m3 ] ADEQ ASARCO LLC -3.87 0.27 2011 Freeport ADEQ McMoRan Copper -4.87 0.06 2011 and Gold Inc. *consider data from the past 3 years. Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None Design Value Date (third month, year) # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed June, 2011 1 1 0 April, 2011 1 1 0 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 148 Page 2 of 2 cc: Meredith Kurpius, USEPA, Region 9 Michael Flagg, USEPA, Region 9 Theresa Rigney, ADEQ Figure 1 Aerial photograph of current PM10 monitor location at Payson Well Site Figure 3.3‐2 Google Earth Image of the proposed PM10 monitor location at Payson Well Site