State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan For the Year 2012 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section Final August 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................4 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ...............................................................6 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network ..........................................................................................................6 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ...................................................7 2.3 Source Oriented Network ..................................................................................................................7 2.4 NCore Network..................................................................................................................................8 2.5 Meteorological Network ....................................................................................................................8 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ................................................................8 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) .......................................................................................9 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)................................................................................................9 2.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program ..............................................................................10 2.10 AIRNow Reporting........................................................................................................................10 2.11 Urban Haze Network .....................................................................................................................10 2.12 E-BAM Network of PM 2.5 Special Purpose Monitors ..................................................................11 2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network ................................................................................................11 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION................................................................................12 3.1 Site Closures ....................................................................................................................................12 3.2 New Sites .........................................................................................................................................13 3.3 Instrument Changes .........................................................................................................................13 3.4 Summary of Network Changes........................................................................................................15 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS.............................................................................................17 4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements ......................................................................................17 4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements .......................................................................................20 4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements ...........................................................................................24 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements............................................................................................25 4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements .........................................................................................26 4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ........................................................................................27 4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements ..........................................................................................28 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements .....................................................................................28 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements .....................................................................................30 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ........................................................................................31 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements...............................................................32 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 2 4.12 Class I Visibility Network .............................................................................................................34 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network ..................................................................................................35 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network ................................................................................................36 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE .........................................................................38 5.1 The Quality System .........................................................................................................................38 5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements................................................40 5.3 Calculations and Reporting..............................................................................................................43 5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities ................................................................................................43 5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities .............................................................................................................44 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................46 APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS.........................................................................................................48 APPENDIX C CURRENT MONITORS BY PROGRAMS OR NETWORK .......................................60 APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES ......................................................................90 APPENDIX E 2012 EPA MONITORING SCHEDULE .....................................................................150 APPENDIX F DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT .................................................................151 APPENDIX G ADEQ PM 2.5 SAMPLE FREQUENCY CLARIFICATIONS AND REQUEST FOR SAMPLING FREQUENCY REDUCTIONS...............................................................167 APPENDIX H PROPOSED CHANGES TO SO 2 AND PM 10 NETWORKS IN MIAMI AND HAYDEN, AZ ..............................................................................................................171 APPENDIX I CRITERIA POLLUTANT MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.............180 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a), requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual network monitoring plan for the year 2012. This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 2011, as well as activities ADEQ will undertake July 2012, through December 2013. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database and to AIRNow. In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contains the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality. Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully-chosen physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:            State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) Special Purpose Monitors (SPM) Urban Haze monitoring sites Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) AIRNow information sites Source-oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry) Meteorological sites This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E as follows:     Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 4 should be modified (through termination of existing stations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet their objectives and data needs. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and useful air quality data. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 5 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics across the networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's current monitoring sites (or those recently closed), including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs that ADEQ participates in is described in the following sections. 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network The largest compliance network in Arizona consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ozone (O 3 ), particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb). The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments that have been certified by the EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria:  Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant  Objectives and spatial scales  Sampling frequency  Collocation  Special NCore-related requirements  Meteorology  Probe location and other restrictions within a site  Periodic performance evaluations  Quality Assurance  Data reporting 2.1.1 Changes to the NAAQS Pb – In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μg/m3 to 0.15 μg/m3. New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. The rule also clarified that monitoring near airports was only required at select locations. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites that are located within CBSAs with populations of 500,000 or greater. NCore Pb monitors and source-oriented Pb monitors associated with the new 0.5 to one ton emissions threshold were to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 6 O 3 – After several delays, in September 2011, the EPA indicated that they would uphold their original 2008 decision to set the eight-hour NAAQS at 0.075 ppm. The EPA has also indicated that the proposed monitoring rule issued in July 2009, would likely not move forward on several fronts. The EPA has unofficially stated that the only part of the proposed rule that may be implemented would be the changes in ozone seasons. As a result, unlike previous network plans, ADEQ will not include the 2009 proposed monitoring rule in their network plan evaluation for 2012. SO 2 – In June 2010, EPA revised the primary SO 2 standard by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). The new form is the three-year average of the 99th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour concentrations. It is also revoking the two existing primary standards of 140 ppb evaluated over 24 hours and the 30 ppb evaluated over a year. Additionally, the EPA required changes to data reporting requirements to include reporting the maximum five minute concentration for each hour in addition to the hourly averaged concentrations. ADEQ began collecting and processing hourly maximum five minute SO 2 concentrations in July and August, 2010. New monitoring requirements for placement of monitors were also issued, and monitors must be operational by January, 2013. The new monitoring requirements do not result in any SO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors will be covered by Maricopa and Pima County agencies and the source oriented monitors have been established for years. NO 2 – In January 2010, EPA set a new one-hour standard for NO 2 of 100 ppb. EPA is retaining the annual standard of 53 ppb. The form of the standard is the three-year average of the 98th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour average concentrations. New monitoring requirements were established including near roadway monitors in urban areas, additional urban monitors in large urban areas, and monitors in areas with populations susceptible to NO 2 related health effects. The new monitoring requirements are not expected to result in any NO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors and near roadway monitors will be operated by Maricopa and Pima County agencies. CO – In August 2011, EPA finalized network design changes that would place CO monitors at a subset of near-road NO 2 monitoring sites. ADEQ will not be required to and does not anticipate creating any near-road NO 2 sites. Two sites are anticipated in Maricopa County and one in Pima County. ADEQ’s CO monitoring efforts continue to focus on CO trace-level monitoring at the JLG Supersite as part of the NCore network. 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently not attaining one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met, but ongoing demonstration of compliance is required. Monitoring requirements for these areas are described in their associated SIPs. 2.3 Source Oriented Network Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , in and around the permitted facility. These monitors constitute a subset of the compliance monitoring network described above. ADEQ activities State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 7 with respect to this network have been limited to performance audits and review of ambient data summaries submitted by the individual sources. Recently, however, SIP support has required the submittal of data by some sources to the AQS, including review of quality assurance documents kept by the sources to support their ambient monitoring programs. ADEQ continues to work with the permitted facilities to obtain all ambient air quality data that are required to be reported to AQS. In 2012, a proposal was submitted to ASARCO and Freeport-McMoRan suggesting changes in the source SO 2 monitoring at their facilities at Hayden and Miami, respectively. These suggested changes involved ADEQ assuming additional monitoring responsibilities. Additional information is provided in the Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements section. 2.4 NCore Network EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some of the missions of the NCore network are:  Tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants;  Support for long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;  Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; and  Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses. As required under 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies that may be adopted in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples would include advanced communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to the current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html 2.5 Meteorological Network ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ intends to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that are not currently equipped. Additions will occur as time and funding permits. A priority list has been created to sequence the installations as materials and manpower become available. 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of ozone, oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total reactive nitrogen (NOy, speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 8 CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, the affected states began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of ozone. Each SIP for the affected areas must contain commitments to implement the appropriate ambient monitoring network for such air pollutants. The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their SIP monitoring networks in O 3 non-attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutant and meteorological data are the widespread non-attainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQ operates three PAMS sites, JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley (type 3), and VEI (meteorological) to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area. EPA has recently assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and consider the possible re-invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and included PAMS objectives, network design, methods, and quality assurance. ADEQ participated in the PAMS reinvention process and will continue to follow this activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network. 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes in the risks of human exposure. These changes can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long-term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. ADEQ accepted federal funding and responsibility for this program in 2003. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for Phoenix. 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM 2.5 samples collected at select sites throughout the country. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs. The network has increased to around 200 sites nationwide. Monitoring at JLG Supersite includes one STN speciation sampler and two IMPROVE samplers as part of the CSN network. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the IMPROVE network and are used for comparison of the speciation results from both programs. In 2009, a URG 3000N carbon sampler was added and data from that sampler was then used in place of the data from the Met One SASS carbon channel. This substitution was made as part of a national program designed to make the characteristics of the CSN carbon method match the IMPROVE carbon method more closely. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 9 2.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class I areas (CIAs) and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, which was performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally-operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Wilderness Areas across the United States. In addition to the eleven Class 1 sites (two were combined in the past) ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites identified as Protocol sites in the IMPROVE table in Appendix C. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class I Visibility and IMPROVE networks. Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network. 2.10 AIRNow Reporting ADEQ has recently renewed efforts to provide data to the AIRNow system and has been successful in transferring some data to AIRNow via their new AQCSV file format. Data currently being submitted to AIRNow on a near-real time basis include, ozone, continuous PM 10 and PM 2.5 , and SO 2 data. ADEQ will continue their efforts in expanding their data submission to AIRNow to support air quality forecasting and near-real time data reporting. Appendix C contains an indication of whether data from specific monitors and sites are submitting data to AIRNow. 2.11 Urban Haze Network Historically, ADEQ operated an urban haze network in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas. The purpose of the networks is to provide policy-makers and the public with information regarding urban haze levels, track short-term and long-term urban haze trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies on urban haze. Equipment used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. A wealth of urban visibility related data and information have been collected for more than a decade in both the Phoenix and Tucson area. In 2010, due to budget cuts, this non-mandatory program was reduced to operate in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area only. This network includes digital cameras, nephelometers, and transmissometer. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 10 2.12 E-BAM Network of PM 2.5 Special Purpose Monitors The current network of E-BAM continuous particulate special purpose monitors (listed in Table 2.12-1) is composed of lightweight, portable monitors typically enclosed in self-contained, environmentally sealed containers. They can be battery or solar powered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. E-BAMs continuously sample and report particulate concentrations. Data are sampled every second and concentrations recorded every minute. E-BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United Sates, to provide continuous, real-time particulate concentration data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns. E-BAM instruments are used for special purpose monitoring only. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily to monitor populated areas that could be impacted by prescribed burns and wildfires. Historically, ADEQ’s E-BAM monitors have been configured to measure particles ≤ 10 microns in diameter (PM 10 ). To get a better understanding of smoke impacts in these smaller communities, ADEQ changed the configuration in 2011 of these monitors to measure only particles PM 2.5 . Hourly data from the E-BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx. Table 2.12-1 Location of E-BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322 2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network Historically, ADEQ has been involved in ambient air quality monitoring along the Arizona / Mexico border. Initially, ADEQ conducted particulate monitoring on both sides of the border. In 2008, due to changes in federal regulations regarding documentation needed to cross the border, ADEQ staff were not permitted to cross the border into Mexico. As a result, ADEQ’s direct involvement with ambient air quality monitoring in Mexico was reduced. In its place, ADEQ relied upon contractors to perform the monitoring on the Mexico side of the border. Due to recent budget constraints by both ADEQ and EPA, this program could no longer be funded. As a result, the Agua Prieta Fire Station, Sonora Nogales Fire Station, and San Luis Rio Colorado monitoring sites were closed in June 2011. Currently, ADEQ is working with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Policy Forum and the Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group will review the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluate the adequacy of these networks to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are expected to develop, such that data can be shared across the border and capacity can be built to meet the needs of each of the air monitoring program objectives. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 11 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION This section provides a summary of the changes in ADEQ's current monitoring network that have taken place since the 2011 Network Plan was issued as well as changes planned for the next 18 months. While future changes cannot always be anticipated due to unforeseen circumstances, ADEQ puts forth an extensive effort to document plans for future changes throughout the monitoring network. In the instances that unforeseen changes occur to the monitoring network, these changes will always be documented as having occurred via the network plan. A summary of the changes are listed below. Specific details regarding these changes can be found in their respective sections within Section 4. 3.1 Site Closures Prescott College AQD – The site may be closed following the 2012 ozone season. It does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. These conditions make the Prescott College AQD site unsuitable for continued, long-term placement of the O 3 monitor. In addition, environmental control issues (the O 3 instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable site will continue in 2012. ADEQ plans to run O 3 monitors at the current Prescott site and at an additional site in Prescott during a portion of the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. A potential site has been identified at a Prescott Parks Maintenance building located in the vicinity of Embry Riddle University at 3700 Willow Creek Road in Prescott (ZIP 86301). An E-BAM monitor is also located at the Prescott College site. At this time, it is not known if this E-BAM monitor will be removed along with the O 3 monitor. Mexico Sites – Due to budget constraints by both ADEQ and EPA, the Agua Prieta Fire Station, Sonora Nogales Fire Station, and San Luis Rio Colorado monitoring sites were closed in June 2011. ADEQ is working with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Policy Forum and the Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group will review the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluate the adequacy of these networks to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies. Sedona Post Office – Due to concerns about local emissions affecting the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor, a new site was established in Sedona and the Sedona Post Office site was discontinued. Several sites were evaluated with temporary monitors. A location at a Fire Station was determined to be most representative and best suited to house the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor. Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South – In an effort to consolidate meteorological and PM instrumentation near the lime plant at Paul Spur, the previously existing meteorological station was discontinued and the meteorological instrumentation was moved to the same location as the PM 10 instruments. Miami Ridgeline – ADEQ is in the beginning stages of transitioning the Miami, AZ area sites to operation by ADEQ staff. As a result, two additional SO 2 sites and one additional PM 10 site will be operated by ADEQ. With the addition of these sites, ADEQ is proposing to discontinue the Miami State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 12 Ridgeline site. The exact timing of this is not known and this process may take some time due to the complex nature of such an action. Additional details may be found in Section 4. 3.2 New Sites Replacement for Prescott College AQD – An O 3 monitor will be located at a new site in Prescott. The current site does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. In addition, environmental control issues have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A potential site has been identified at a Prescott Parks Maintenance building located in the vicinity of Embry Riddle University at 3700 Willow Creek Road in Prescott (ZIP 86301). It is ADEQ’s goal to run O 3 monitors at the two sites in Prescott during a portion of the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. Sedona Fire Station AQD – Due to concerns about local emissions affecting the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor that was previously located at a Post Office, a new site was established in Sedona. Several sites were evaluated with temporary monitors. A location at a Fire Station was determined to be most representative and best suited to house the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor. Miami, AZ area sites – ADEQ is in the beginning stages of transitioning the Miami, AZ area sites to operation by ADEQ staff. As a result, two additional SO 2 sites and one additional PM 10 site will be operated by ADEQ. These new sites include Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite for SO 2 and Miami Golf Course for PM 10 . Additional details may be found in Section 4. 3.3 Instrument Changes Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant PM 10 – The collocated Partisol 2000 instruments were replaced by a continuous TEOM instrument at the beginning of 2012. This reduced the filter-based PM 10 network to six sites which reduced the required number of collocated PM 10 sites to one which is currently Payson Well Site. Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Meteorology – In an effort to consolidate meteorological and PM instrumentation near the lime plant at Paul Spur, the previously existing meteorological station was discontinued and the meteorological instrumentation was moved to the same location as the PM 10 instruments. Additionally, in an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe was installed at the new site to accompany the existing anemometer. JLG Supersite PM 10 , and PM 2.5 TEOMs – The PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and the PM 10 TEOM instruments will be removed at the end of June 2012. Simultaneous TEOM and BAM monitoring was warranted for a period of time to assess the comparability between the two instrument types. JLG Supersite Pb – Recent revisions to the Pb monitoring rule required Pb monitoring at NCore sites that are located within a combined statistical area (CBSA) with a population greater than 500,000. The Phoenix CBSA meets this population requirement, therefore, Pb monitoring is required at ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite). Currently, a PM 10 low volume sampler produces Pb results as part of the NATTS PM 10 Metals program. ERG recently obtained approval of their ICP-MS analysis method for Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 13 and will report the Pb concentrations as part of the NAAQS requirement. It is important to note that no physical changes in instrumentation or analysis method will have been made. Miami Golf Course PM 10 – ADEQ plans to install a continuous PM 10 TEOM at the Miami Golf Course site in Miami, AZ. The PM instrumentation at this site has historically been operated by Freeport McMoRan. The exact date of installment is not known, but should occur prior to the start of 2013. The data generated from this TEOM will be reported to EPA’s AQS database and serve as the official NAAQS compliance data for the Miami, AZ planning area. Bullhead City PM 10 – ADEQ anticipates replacing the Partisol 2000 PM 10 instrument with a continuous PM 10 TEOM. There’s also a possibility that a new site may be needed due to some uncertainties at the current Post Office. Logistics are currently being evaluated and a definitive date for replacement has not been determined. Douglas Red Cross PM 10 & PM 2.5 – ADEQ anticipates replacing the Partisol PM 10 and PM 2.5 instruments with continuous PM instruments. ADEQ is still evaluating which continuous PM 2.5 monitoring method to use, and the decision may impact the continuous PM 10 method selected for the Douglas Red Cross site. Nogales Post Office Meteorology – In an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe was added to the Nogales Post Office site in August, 2011, which previously only contained an anemometer for measurements of wind speed and direction. Ajo Meteorology – In an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe may be added to the Ajo site which currently only contains an anemometer for measurements of wind speed and direction. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 14 3.4 Summary of Network Changes Site Name Table 3.4-1 Instruments Closed in 2011-2012 or to be Closed in 2012-2013 Monitor Parameter(s) Report AQS ID Classification Scale Reason for Monitor Closure Objective Measured to AQS JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and PM 10 TEOM replaced by NCore BAMS monitors Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 04-003-0011 SLAMS Middle Source PM 10 Yes Collocated Partisol 2000 PM 10 instruments replaced by PM 10 TEOM Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South NA SLAMS Middle Source Wind No Meteorology moved from Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site to Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant. 04-005-1010 SPM Neighborhood Population PM 2.5 EBAM No Adverse affect of local emissions. Site moved to Sedona Fire Station AQD Sedona Post Office Prescott College AQD 04-025-8033 SLAMS Neighborhood Population O3 Yes Site does not meet EPA siting requirements Bullhead City 04-015-1003 SLAMS Neighborhood Population PM 10 Yes Partisol 2000 FRM anticipated to be replaced by a continuous instrument Miami Ridgeline 04-007-0009 SLAMS Neighborhood Source SO 2 , PM 10 Yes Proposing to close site. Associated with transition to ADEQ operation of Miami monitors Agua Prieta Fire Station 80-26-1000 SPM Neighborhood Transport PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes Funds not available for continued operation San Luis Rio Colorado 80-26-8012 SPM Neighborhood Transport PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes Funds not available for continued operation Sonora Nogales Fire Station 80-26-0005 SPM Neighborhood Transport PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes Funds not available for continued operation Site/City Name Prescott MSA Table 3.4-2 Instruments Added in 2011-2012 or to be Added in 2012-2013 Parameter(s) Report AQS ID Classification Scale Objective Reason for Monitor Addition Measured to AQS NA SLAMS Urban or Neighborhood Population O3 Yes Replacement for Prescott College AQD Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 04-003-0011 SLAMS Middle Source PM 10 , Met Yes PM 10 TEOM replaced collocated Partisol 2000 PM 10 instrument. Met added replacing instruments from nearby site. Douglas Red Cross 04-003-1005 SLAMS Neighborhood Population PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes Continuous PM 10 and PM 2.5 instruments anticipated to replace filter-based Partisol 2000s. Bullhead City 04-015-1003 SLAMS Neighborhood Population PM10 Yes Continuous PM 10 anticipated to replace Partisol 2000 FRM Miami Golf Course 04-007-8000 SLAMS Neighborhood Population PM 10 Yes Install TEOM as part of transition from Freeport McMoRan to ADEQ operation State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 15 Site/City Name AQS ID Classification Scale Objective Parameter(s) Report Reason for Monitor Addition Measured to AQS Miami Townsite NA SLAMS Neighborhood Population SO 2 Yes Install SO 2 analyzer as part of transition from Freeport McMoRan to ADEQ operation Jones Ranch NA SLAMS Middle Source SO 2 Yes Install SO 2 analyzer as part of transition from Freeport McMoRan to ADEQ operation Sedona Fire Station AQD NA SPM Neighborhood Population PM 2.5 EBAM No Site moved to Sedona Fire Station AQD from Sedona Post Office Nogales Post Office 04-023-0004 SLAMS Neighborhood Population TEMP/RH No TEMP/RH probe added to conform to ADEQ Met standards Ajo 04-019-0001 SLAMS Neighborhood Source TEMP/RH No TEMP/RH probe anticipated to be added to existing site. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 16 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS Minimum monitoring requirements for the number of sites in SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas. As EPA reviews the NAAQS for each of the criteria pollutants, additional monitoring requirements for these pollutants may be added. The additional requirements may be based on population or a combination of population and some other metric, such as design values, traffic counts, or emission inventories. Additional monitoring requirements may also be based solely on the discretion of the EPA Regional Administration to adequately assess air quality for sensitive population groups. Currently, minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Table 4.0-1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas As of the July 2010 Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population Flagstaff Coconino County 134,421 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 200,186 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887 Prescott Yavapai County 211,033 Tucson Pima County 980,263 Yuma Yuma County 195,751 Table 4.0-2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas As of the July 2010 Census Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420 Payson Gila 53,597 Safford Graham 45,657 Show Low Navajo 107,449 Sierra Vista-Douglas Cochise 131,346 4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0-1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1-2). Table 4.1-1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 yr Most recent 3 yr design value ≥ 85% of design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS * any PM 2.5 NAAQS * >1,000,000 3 2 500,000 – 1,000,000 2 1 50,000 – 500,000 1 0 * 85% of Annual NAAQS (15 μg/m3) = 12.75 μg/m3; 85% of 24-Hour NAAQS (35 μg/m3) = 29.75 μg/m3 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 17 The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter-based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.12). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1) states the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor. For SLAMS PM 2.5 sites with manual and continuous PM 2.5 monitors, the agency may request approval from the EPA Regional Administrator for a reduction to every sixth day and/or seasonal sampling schedule. However, in response to EPA’s approval letter for the 2011 Network Plan, ADEQ intends to clarify the sampling schedules for PM 2.5 FRM monitors. Table 4.1-2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ FRM/FEM Sites 2009-2011 24-Hour 2009-2011 Annual Current Required Site Name Design Value Design Value Sample Frequency (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Frequency Douglas Red Cross 13 7.0 1 in 6 1 in 3 Flagstaff Middle School 14 5.9 1 in 6 1 in 6 JLG Supersite 21 8.2 1 in 3 1 in 3 Nogales Post Office 30 11.1 1 in 6 1 in 6 Prescott Valley* 10 4.3 1 in 6 1 in 6 Yuma Supersite* 15 7.5 1 in 6 1 in 6 * Indicates SPM monitor ADEQ currently operates EPA-approved FRM samplers at six PM 2.5 monitoring sites. In addition to the PM 2.5 FRM at JLG Supersite, ADEQ also operates an EPA-approved FEM continuous monitor at this site to fulfill NCore requirements. The FRM sampler is considered the primary monitor for PM 2.5 NAAQS compliance purposes. Several non-FEM continuous PM 2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are associated with the Smoke Management EBAM network. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the EBAM network. Monitor Type and Sample Schedule Clarification ADEQ operates two collocated Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instruments and a PM 2.5 non-FEM BAM continuous instrument at the Nogales Post Office site. This combination of instruments along with Regional Administrator approval results in a 1-in-6 day monitoring frequency requirement for the FRM instrument(s). ADEQ may replace the non-FEM continuous instrument with an FEM continuous instrument in the future, but until then, plans to maintain the same configuration that is currently in place at the Nogales Post Office site. ADEQ operates a PM 2.5 FRM instrument at Flagstaff Middle School on a 1-in-6 sampling schedule. ADEQ may re-evaluate the need for a PM 2.5 monitor at Flagstaff Middle school due to the long history of low concentrations. at this site. Until then, ADEQ plans to continue operating the FRM sampler on a 1-in-6 sampling schedule due to the collocated continuous non-FEM monitor that is in place as part of the EBAM network. The Prescott Valley and Yuma Supersite PM 2.5 monitors are special purpose monitors and as a result, can operate on the 1-in-6 day sampling schedule. These monitors had been mistakenly labeled as SLAMS monitors in previous network plans. As part of the 2012 network plan, ADEQ’s intent is to clarify these monitors as SPMs. The initial designation of these monitors as SPMs occurred in the 2007 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 18 network plan. In the coming years, ADEQ plans to evaluate the data at these sites to determine if future monitoring is warranted. PM 2.5 concentrations have been low at both sites, particularly at Prescott Valley. Considering the above clarifications, as can be seen from Table 4.1-2, the only PM 2.5 FRM monitor that does not meet the sample frequency requirement is the Douglas Red Cross site. ADEQ plans to replace the Douglas Red Cross filter-based instrument with an FEM continuous instrument following the availability of additional 103 funds. For additional details of the PM 2.5 network and associated sample schedules, see Appendix G for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval. SLAMS Sites with design values ±10 percent of 35µg/m3 (31.5 to 38.5µg/m3) and sites where 24-hour values exceed the NAAQS for three consecutive years require an every third day frequency. Sites within ±5% of 35µg/m3 (33.25 to 36.75µg/m3) need to operate on a daily schedule. At a minimum, operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 2.5 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. More frequent evaluations may occur, which would be addressed in the annual monitoring network plan. 4.1.1 PM 2.5 Collocation Requirements Table 4.1-3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 2.5 collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ PM 2.5 network. This site is the Nogales Post Office Site, which is the highest PM 2.5 design value site in the ADEQ PM 2.5 network. While ADEQ does operate one continuous FEM monitor at the JLG Supersite, this monitor is not the primary monitor and therefore, does not require a collocated FRM. However, due to NCore requirements, a PM 2.5 FRM is located at this site also. The JLG Supersite continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor is labeled as both an NCore monitor as well as a QA Collocated monitor for the FRM primary monitor. While the methods are different, value is still gained by evaluating data from these collocated monitors. Table 4.1-3 PM 2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code 143 (Partisol 2000) 170 (Met One BAM 1020) # of Sites 6 1 # of Primary Monitors 6 0 # of Required Collocated Monitors 1 0 # of Active Collocated Monitors 21 12 1 One site contains collocated monitors of the same method (Nogales Post Office) while one contains collocated monitors of differing methods (JLG Supersite) 2 Collocation is of differing methods (JLG Supersite) 4.1.2 Compliance with 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c) A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone, including a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 19 to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor. 4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.2-1) and design values for PM 10 24-hour concentrations (see Table 4.2-2). Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have delegation authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 non-attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ operates a PM coarse monitor (difference method using BAM instruments) in the Phoenix metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. PM 10 concentrations are available from the PM 10 BAM instrument to support the multipollutant measurements at that site. Table 4.2-1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Medium High Concentration Low Concentration Concentration Exceeds 24-Hour Less than 80% of Population (MSA) Exceeds 80% of 24NAAQS by 20% or 24-Hour NAAQS Hour NAAQS more (>180µg/m3) (<120 µg/m3) (>120µg/m3) >1,000,000 6-10 4-8 2-4 500,000 – 1,000,000 4-8 2-4 1-2 250,000 – 500,000 3-4 1-2 0-1 100,000 – 250,000 1-2 0-1 0 The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e) states that for PM 10 sites, “…the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24-hour standard.” In rural areas of Arizona where there is only one PM 10 monitor to represent the area, such as Ajo, Hayden, and Yuma, sites can be considered de facto maximum-concentration sites whose operating frequencies must be determined using the Ratio-to-Standard diagram in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e). Due to the variability in PM 10 concentrations from year to year throughout Arizona, the operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. In response to the PM 10 sampling frequency comments raised in EPA’s approval letter of ADEQ’s 2011 Network Plan, State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 20 PM 10 sample frequencies are specifically addressed in this year’s plan. Table 4.2-2 provides the maximum 24-hour concentration and the ‘design value to NAAQS ratio’ for each site as was published in the 2010 Network Plan, as well as updated information using the most recent data (2009-2011). As can be seen in the table, four of the twelve sites experienced a change in the required sampling frequency over the two year period. Two sites would have required more frequent sampling while two would have required less frequent sampling. Based on the recommended methodology used to assess PM 10 sample frequencies, the changes in required sampling frequencies that would occur on a year to year basis make it impractical to assess and implement sample frequency changes as part of the annual monitoring network plan. As a result, ADEQ has confirmed that the Five Year Network Assessment will be a better tool to assess sampling frequencies throughout the PM 10 network. Additionally, ADEQ’s general trend towards continuous PM 10 monitoring should alleviate some of these concerns in the future. Taking into consideration the recent changes to the PM 10 network and planned changes to occur in the next year, all sites now meet or exceed the sample frequency requirement as determined from both evaluations. In recent years, ADEQ has transitioned several PM 10 monitors from filter-based methods to continuous methods. As stated in ADEQ’s Five Year Network Assessment, this transition to continuous PM 10 samplers continues to be a focus for ADEQ. As a continuation of this effort, replacing the filter-based PM 10 monitors in Bullhead City and Douglas Red Cross is being evaluated and will likely occur within the next six to twelve months. In addition to these planned changes, ADEQ is also currently negotiating with Freeport McMoRan in the Miami, AZ area to install and operate a continuous PM 10 TEOM at the Miami Golf Course site. The PM 10 monitor at this site has previously been operated by Freeport McMoRan. With the operation of a PM 10 monitor by ADEQ staff, the data can be more efficiently loaded to the ADEQ internal database, and ultimately reported to EPA’s AQS database in a timely manner. Due to potential changes in the SO 2 network, ADEQ is also proposing that Freeport McMoRan discontinue PM 10 monitoring at the Miami Ridgeline site as the Miami Golf Course site represents maximum concentrations in the Miami area. For additional details on these proposed changes to the PM 10 network, see Appendix H for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval. Table 4.2-3 shows the most recent design values for all sites within ADEQ’s PM 10 network. Due to the large number of exceptional events that have occurred over the last several years, two separate design value scenarios are provided. Additionally, due to changes from filter-based to continuous monitors at several sites, PM 10 data from different instrumentation were merged at some sites to calculate the expected number of exceedances over the three-year period. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 21 Table 4.2-2 PM 10 Maximum Values and Sampling Frequencies for ADEQ Monitors 2007-2009 Max (μg/m3) Site Name Ratio 2009-2011 Max (μg/m3) Ratio Current Sample Frequency Required Frequency Ajo 153 1.02 213 1.42 Continuous 2010 Network Plan Every Day Bullhead City 98 0.65 132 0.88 1 in 6 1 in 6 Douglas Red Cross Flagstaff Middle School Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite 97 0.65 138 0.92 1 in 6 1 in 6 2012 Network Plan 1 in 6 Every Other Day Every Day 56 0.37 61 0.40 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 225 521 1.50 3.47 225 331 1.50 2.20 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Nogales Post Office 238 1.58 238 1.58 Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 159 1.06 85 0.56 Continuous Every Day 1 in 6 61 63 208 386 0.41 0.42 1.39 2.57 42 90 242 306 0.28 0.60 1.61 2.04 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito Yuma State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 22 Table 4.2-3 PM 10 Design Values (Estimated Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites Site Name 2009-2011 Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μg/m3 Including Events Ajo 1 Bullhead City Douglas Red Cross * Flagstaff Middle School Hayden Old Jail 1 JLG Supersite Nogales Post Office FRM Nogales Post Office Continuous Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito 1 Yuma Supersite 2 2009-2011 Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μg/m3 Excluding Events 1.4 0 0 0 1.0 2.0 0 4.2 0 0 0 2.0 2.7 2011 Annual Mean Concentration μg/m3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 15.4 34.5 15.7 40.5 34.3 39.7 54.2 23.2 18.0 11.4 41.9 29.8 1 Filter-based and continuous records merged to calculate design value Continuous records from Yuma Courthouse and Yuma Supersite merged to calculate design value * Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria 2 4.2.1 PM 10 Collocation Requirements Table 4.2-1 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 10 collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ PM 10 network. This site is the Payson Well Site. While the Payson Well Site annual mean is not within the highest 25% of the PM 10 FRM network, the highest site (Nogales Post Office) is collocated with a PM 10 BAM monitor. The Payson Well Site is the third highest of the PM 10 FRM network. In addition to the one required collocated site, ADEQ operates two additional sites with collocated PM 10 instruments, although one of these sites (JLG Supersite) will be reduced to one PM 10 monitor in the near future. While the methods are different, value is still gained by evaluating data from these collocated monitors. Table 4.2-4 PM 10 FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code 126 (Partisol 2000) 079 (TEOM) 122 (BAM) # of Sites 6 6 2 # of Primary Monitors 6 5 1 # of Required Collocated Monitors 1 0 0 # of Active Collocated Monitors 21 12 12 1 One site contains collocated monitors of the same method (Payson Well Site) while one contains collocated monitors of differing methods (Nogales Post Office) 2 Collocation is of differing methods (Nogales Post Office FRM & BAM; JLG Supersite BAM & TEOM) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 23 4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements The minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown below in Table 4.3-1. In September 2011, the EPA indicated that they would uphold their original 2008 decision to set the eight-hour NAAQS at 0.075 ppm. The EPA has also indicated that the proposed monitoring rule issued in July 2009, would likely not move forward on several fronts. Unlike previous network plans, ADEQ will not include the 2009 proposed monitoring rule in their network plan evaluation for 2012. As a result, ADEQ is no longer considering installing an ozone monitor within the Lake Havasu / Kingman MSA. If future monitoring rules require such a monitor, ADEQ will re-evaluate the ozone network. Table 4.3-1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Most recent 3 year 8hour Design Value ≥ Most recent 3 year 8Population (MSA) 85% of NAAQS (0.075 hour Design Value <85% ppm) or no Design NAAQS (0.075 ppm) Value available >10 Million 4 2 4-10 Million 3 1 350,000 - 4 Million 2 1 50,000 – 350,000 1 0 ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3-2). Authority to operate O 3 monitors has been delegated to Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties. ADEQ will be relocating the Prescott College AQD monitor following the 2012 O 3 season due to siting requirements. Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, ADEQ upgraded their O 3 monitoring network by replacing the Thermo 43C analyzers with newer API Teledyne analyzers. Table 4.3-2 O 3 Design Values at ADEQ Sites Current Operating 2009-2011 Site Schedule Design Value (ppm) Alamo Lake March - October 0.070 Flagstaff Middle School March - October 0.067 JLG Supersite January - December 0.075 Prescott College AQD March - October 0.066 Queen Valley March - October 0.073 Tonto National Monument March - October 0.072 Yuma Supersite March - October 0.073 4.3.1 O 3 Season In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), ADEQ was granted a modification to the January through December O 3 season defined in the regulation. Prior to the 2008 revision to the O 3 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 24 NAAQS, the 1998 EPA guidance document entitled, “Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an Eight-Hour Ozone Standard” supported a shorter O 3 season for Arizona (April through October) based upon data collected from 1990-1995. During the Spring of 2011, this analysis was updated to include the 2008 O 3 NAAQS, as well as more recent data. To get the best representation of the entire state, data from all O 3 sites in Arizona were used in the analysis. For the period 2006-2010, the average number of days above 85 percent of the 2008 NAAQS of 0.075 ppm continues to support the operation of seasonal monitors (see Figure 4.3-1). However, the data indicate that the O 3 season should be extended one month to include the month of March. In 2012 ADEQ extended the O 3 season by starting to monitor in March instead of April. ADEQ may do additional monitoring in the off season of November – February for its own purposes; however, those data will not be reported to the AQS database. As shown in Table 4.3-2, the current ADEQ seasonal sites are Alamo Lake, Flagstaff Middle School, Prescott College AQD, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument, and Yuma Supersite. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule. Figure 4.3-1 Average Number of Days exceeding 85% of the 2008 O 3 NAAQS Total Ozone Exceedances 2006-2010 Average Number of Days > 85% Ozone Standard In All Arizona Ozone Sites Combined 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μg/m3 to 0.15 μg/m3. New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December, 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to 1 ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites with CBSA populations greater than 500,000. ADEQ has installed source-oriented Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective January, 2011. For the NCore-Pb requirement, ADEQ will use the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program for the analysis of Pb in PM 10 . Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples and has recently received EPA approval for the ICP-MS analysis method for lead. No changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb data collected at JLG Supersite; however, a new parameter code and method code may be associated with the data in AQS due to the newly approved analysis method. The Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 25 monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb monitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold. Table 4.4-1 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2009-2011 Design Site Name Value (µg/m3) Globe Highway 1 0.27 2 Miami Golf Course 0.06 JLG Supersite * --* PM 10 Metals (low-Vol., filter-based) analysis method approved 2012 Design Value based on one year of data, but is valid due to NAAQS violation 2 Design Value invalid due to incomplete data (only one year collected) 1 4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements Table 4.4-2 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ Pb network. This site is the Globe Highway site in Hayden, AZ. As can be seen in table 4.4-1, this site contains the highest design value in the Pb network. Collocation for NCore-Pb sites are determined by the EPA, and the JLG Supersite has not been selected as a collocated site. Table 4.4-2 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details Method Code # of Sites 191 (Pb-TSP ICPMS) 202 (Pb-PM 10 ICPMS) 2 1 # of Primary Monitors 2 1 # of Required Collocated Monitors 1 0 # of Active Collocated Monitors 1 0 4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates a network of three SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. ASARCO LLC and FreeportMcMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. also operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for compliance purposes to support SIP requirements. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both companies to make changes in which ADEQ may assume some of the SO 2 monitoring responsibilities. Table 4.5-1 SO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2009-2011 1-Hour Site Name Design Value (ppb) Miami Ridgeline 111 Hayden Old Jail 259 JLG Supersite * 7 * Based on incomplete data (2011) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 26 The SO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D is based on a Population Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) that is calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO 2 . The current SO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. In an effort to more efficiently report SO 2 and PM 10 data to EPA’s AQS database, ADEQ has begun negotiations with Freeport McMoRan to discuss changes in operator status. ADEQ may assume monitoring responsibilities or collocate monitors at Freeport McMoRan sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ is proposing to collocate SO 2 monitors at Freeport McMoRan’s Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites. Data from these monitors would be routinely reported to EPA’s AQS database. In doing so, ADEQ is proposing to discontinue the Miami Ridgeline site as the Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites would provide sufficient coverage for SO 2 concentrations in the Miami area with the Jones Ranch site representing maximum concentrations and the Miami Townsite site representing general population exposure. For additional details on these changes, see Appendix H for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to discuss similar changes. Until a more permanent plan is established, ADEQ will continue to operate at least one SO 2 monitor in the Hayden and Miami areas to support the local facility networks. Additionally, ADEQ will continue to work with these facilities to obtain quality assured data and will perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. ADEQ also operates a trace-level SO 2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. 4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO 2 monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement. Authority to operate NO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 which also contain roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT also require two near roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0-1, two CBSAs (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) within the state of Arizona contain populations greater than 500,000 and therefore require at least one NO 2 near roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA also exceeds the 2.5 million population requirement, therefore two near roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. Recent guidance from EPA has indicated a phased approach for NO 2 near roadway monitor installments. The phased approach would push back the deadlines for monitor installments to January, 2014 for Maricopa County and January, 2017 for Pima County. As a result, Pima County has relaxed their planning efforts given the longer time frame. As part of the five-year network assessment submitted in 2011, ADEQ has reviewed population and AADT data and has determined that no other areas in the state require near roadway NO 2 monitors. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 27 In addition to the near roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area-wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements which are required for the PAMS program. Table 4.6-1 NO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2009-2011 Site Name 1-Hour Design Value (ppb) JLG Supersite * 54 * Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria 4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates one CO (carbon monoxide) monitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor utilizes an instrument with sufficient sensitivity to monitor trace levels. It is located at the JLG Supersite to fulfill NCore and PAMS monitoring requirements. Authority to operate CO monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million population requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near-road NO 2 monitor. The required near roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County. The most recent Census data show the Tucson MSA slipped slightly below one million so no near-road CO monitoring is required. The one CO monitor that is currently operated by ADEQ meets or exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS, network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. Due to the low range for which the JLG CO analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution when interpreting data for the purpose of NAAQS compliance. While under most circumstances the data can be used to determine compliance with the CO NAAQS due to the low nature of the ambient concentrations, the operating range (0-5 ppm) is below that of the CO NAAQS (9 ppm), therefore under certain rare circumstances (i.e. concentrations > 5 ppm), determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible. Table 4.7-1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites 2011 2011 CO 8-Hour Site Name CO 1-Hour Design Value (ppm) Design Value (ppm) JLG Supersite * 2.7 2.1 * Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required for State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 28 each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, carbonyls, NO x , trace level nitrogen oxides (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August. ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data. JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. Since the required manual method of eight three-hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24-hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re-engineering program are available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8-1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS but because carbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no current plans to discontinue carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite. Parameter VOC * Carbonyl * CO O3 NOx Meteorology Table 4.8-1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation Period of Collection Method Frequency and Duration Operation June – August Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 Hr June – August Multi-port Carbonyl Every 6th day, 3 - 3hr samples Sampler (0500-0800, 0800-1100, 11001400) Jan – Dec Trace CO Hourly average Jan – Dec O 3 Analyzer Hourly average Jan – Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average Jan – Dec Hourly average  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity * 24-hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also collected year-round as part of the NATTS program Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8-2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 29 Parameter VOC O3 NOy Meteorology Table 4.8-2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation Period of Collection Method Frequency and Duration Operation June – August Multi-port sampler Every 6th day, 24Hr, and 3 – 3hr samples (0500-0800, 1300-1600, 1600-1900) March – October O 3 Analyzer Hourly average June – August NOy Analyzer Hourly average Jan – Dec Hourly average  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters), and relative humidity. Barometric pressure and precipitation measurements are collected by the National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RAAS) and a wind profiler have also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights since 1998. The PAMS re-engineering workgroup has noted the high maintenance cost and lack of use of the RASS and wind profiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use – particularly if usable data is available from other sources. As a result, ADEQ is considering discontinuing its use. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA. Parameter Meteorology Table 4.8-3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Period of Operation Method Duration Jan – Dec  Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) Hourly average  pyranometer (total solar radiation)  ultra-violet (UV solar)  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has a long history of multipollutant monitoring since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, (SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, and CSN) as well as meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9-1. All required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver request to substitute NOx monitoring for NOy. The NCore-Pb requirement is being met by using the current PM 10 metals speciation sampler (PM 10 Low-Vol Partisol 2000) and associated samples. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG analysis method for PM 10 metals State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 30 speciation has been approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) for the analysis of Pb. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore site, the parameter code and method code associated with Pb-PM 10 data in AQS may change as is appropriate. Table 4.9-1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Required Measurement Frequency/Duration Status PM 2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every Thermo Partisol is current instrument; PM 2.5 3rd day samples collected since 1999 24 hour average; MetOne SuperSASS with URG module is current PM 2.5 speciation - organic every 3rd day instrument; STN samples collected since 1999 and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals Continuous PM coarse mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair Continuous PM 2.5 mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair O3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E CO Hourly Ecotech EC 9830 SO 2 Hourly Ecotech EC 9850 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC 9843 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics temperature/relative humidity probe currently in operation Pb 24 hour average; Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS every 6th day PM 10 metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP-MS analysis method as an FEM. 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ is responsible for preparation and submittal of SIPs to EPA for the non-attainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is also responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for these areas with the exception of the delegated agreements with Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties and tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in some SIPs; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10-1 lists the ADEQ and source operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance. Table 4.10-1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites named in SIP). Area and County Phoenix, Maricopa Pollutant CO Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1-hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix-Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8-hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 31 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Douglas-Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross ,Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline Nogales Post Office Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal PM 10 (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Yuma Supersite Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary Miami, Gila SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class I areas Visibility Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe Natl Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West Natl Monument, Meadview NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon - Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon - Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Station, Saguaro National Park-East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around specific facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of some equipment at these sites and review of ambient data submitted according to permit requirements. Recently, ADEQ has begun to submit a portion of these data to the EPA AQS database to support SIP compliance. Sources are required to review their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11-1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. ADEQ staff are currently working with ASARCO and Freeport McMoRan staff to State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 32 acquire and report SO 2 data from Miami and Hayden to the EPA AQS database. In an effort to more efficiently report SO 2 and PM 10 data from these areas to EPA’s AQS database, ADEQ has begun negotiations with Freeport McMoRan to discuss changes in operator status. ADEQ may assume monitoring responsibilities or collocate monitors at existing Freeport McMoRan sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to discuss similar changes. ADEQ will continue to perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. Except for potential changes to the Miami and Hayden area networks, the only other change in the source compliance monitoring network includes the discontinuation of PM 10 monitors in Rillito. ADEQ has operated a continuous PM 10 TEOM in Rillito for several years now, therefore, PM 10 monitoring conducted by the source was determined to be redundant and unnecessary. Table 4.11-1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Site Name City Globe Highway ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Old Jail Chemical Lime Plant Winkelman Hayden Hayden Hayden Junction Hayden Nelson Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon Miami Ridgeline Miami Miami Golf Course FMMI – Miami – Jones Ranch FMMI – Miami – Townsite Miami Miami Miami PCC – Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PCC – Clarkdale SE Clarkdale Carlota Mine – Sanctuary Globe Pollutant(s) SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 Meteorology PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology PM 10 mass and metals speciation PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated SO 2 SO 2 PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology AQS Submittal No No No No No 1 No No Yes (PM 10 mass only) Yes (PM 10 mass only) No 2 No 2 No No No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 33 Site Name TEP – Springerville – Coyote Hills TEP – Springerville – Coal Yard City Springerville Springerville Pollutant(s) NO 2 , PM 10 , SO 2 , Meteorology PM 10 AQS Submittal No No 1 ADEQ also operates an SO 2 monitor at the Hayden Old Jail site. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not. 2 ADEQ has not yet been able to report these data to the AQS database. 4.12 Class I Visibility Network Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation which was performed by the USFS and NPS reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. For the Class I Area designations, EPA initiated a nationally-operated monitoring network in 1987 called the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of the network is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Areas across the United States. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class I areas. During 1999-2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima County, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class I areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12-1. In addition to the Class I IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.121, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and collocated monitors at the JLG Supersite. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has been used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve multiple objectives and its data will be evaluated in the upcoming year to determine if it continues to meet its designated purpose(s) or if it could be better utilized at another location. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class I areas within the state of Arizona. ADEQ's 1996 monitoring plan for the Arizona Class I areas proposed adding optical (nephelometer) and wind-speed and direction meteorological monitoring equipment to existing IMPROVE sites to supplement data collected by the IMPROVE aerosol monitors. Those continuous measurements were intended to supplement the IMPROVE measurements and better characterize the air quality in these areas. Part of the motivation for installing integrating nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was a desire to use short term (five minutes) visibility estimates to model the visual experience of a visitor to a Class I area. A second motivation for installing nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was to provide input to mathematical algorithms that create values that can be compared with the IMPROVE measurements to test the performance of the IMPROVE algorithm. Both the original and the revised IMPROVE State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 34 algorithms tend to slightly over-estimate the lowest extinction values typical of the Arizona IMPROVE sites. Table 4.12-1 2011 Arizona Class I Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Chiricahua Entrance Station Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond) Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network. 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Historically, ADEQ monitored the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas with a network of instruments to characterize and quantify the extent of urban haze. There are no established federal or state standards for acceptable levels of urban haze. ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban hazes by conducting studies during the winter of 1989-90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992-93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long-term, year-round monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. These visibility monitoring data are needed to provide policymakers and the public with information, track short and long-term trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area, and particulate filters for quantifying and characterizing particulate matter. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 35 Due to budget constraints, the Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September, 2010. Approximately a decade of urban haze data were collected in the Tucson area. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network. The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13-1. ADEQ continues to evaluate the Urban Haze program and is currently exploring the possibility of reallocation of the Phoenix visibility camera network to provide resources to additional areas around the state. Table 4.13-1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network - Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer (Bext) (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network ADEQ operates meteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network (Table 4.14-1). Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Currently, Ajo is the only meteorological site that does not have the full suite of meteorological instruments. A temperature / RH probe may be added to this site within the next year to compliment the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction. Except for the items mentioned above ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the meteorological network, but may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources and funding permit. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network can be found in Appendix B. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 36 Table 4.14-1 Meteorology Monitoring Network Site Ajo Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS X No X X X No X X X No X X X Yes X X X No X X X No X X X No X X X No X X X Yes X X X No X X X X X X X X X X Solar only No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 37 Comments For NCore / PAMS support For PAMS support For PAMS support 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE EPA specifies the quality assurance requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix A. Data quality objectives, measurement quality objective and indicators, quality control (QC) checks for the monitors, calculations for data quality assessments, and data reporting requirements are part of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality management system. 5.1 The Quality System All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty, or error, associated with them. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement error, which occurs in the data collection process, and population uncertainty, which relates to the representativeness of samples. ADEQ follows EPA’s quality system approach which uses data quality objectives (DQOs) which are developed prior to sampling in a program’s or project’s planning phase. DQOs specify the amount of tolerable error that is not to be exceeded in order to make decisions using the air assessment data collected for each program’s or project’s specific purpose. To help meet DQOs, measurement quality objectives (MQOs), or performance constraints applied to air monitoring instruments, are used to keep measurement uncertainty within acceptable limits. Population uncertainty is controlled by proper site selection. ADEQ serves as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the air monitoring stations it owns and operates. Being a PQAO streamlines Quality Assurance (QA) efforts by allowing meaningful measurement assessments to take place in a shorter period of time, by allowing expensive assessments such as collocated precision sampling and EPA-required performance evaluation (PE) audits such as the Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and the National Performance Audit Program (NPAP) to take place at less sites and for results to be aggregated at higher levels that are representative of additional ADEQ sites. As a PQAO, ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring instruments to assess how well we are achieving our established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions, and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in-house PE audits. The measurement uncertainty among all ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous, as a result of common factors existing between those stations. Common factors typically include:  stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field procedures (standard operating procedures (SOP)),  common calibration facilities and standards,  use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPP),  oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 38  support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters. 5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff The QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is currently composed of two full-time employees specifically dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA team which is chaired by the agency’s QA/QC and Laboratory Services Manager. The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA requirements are met. The QA Team primarily interacts with staff from the AMU and the Air Filter Laboratory (AFL) both of which are within the AAS. The QA Team has numerous responsibilities that include, but are not necessarily limited to:      Coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program Plans (QAPrP) which are required by EPA Region 9 and/or Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPjP) and SOPs as required by EPA OAQPS for operating air monitoring equipment, sample handling, and sample processing, Conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) of ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services, Monitoring third-party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA, Conducting PE audits on ADEQ, source, and Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) monitors, and Reviewing documents such as chain-of-custody forms, data forms, and instrument performance forms that relate to DQOs. Detailed information on the QA Team’s activities is documented via an Annual Audit Report. 5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents ADEQ has an agency-level Quality Management Plan (QMP) that is managed by the QA/QC Manager who reports to the General Services Section in the Administrative Services Division. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. This version was approved by the Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator in November 2010. The QMP describes the quality management processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality management system that supports programs involving environmental data or technology. The QMP is an “Umbrella” document which details in broad terms the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities. Per EPA Region 9 guidance, AAS submitted a draft QAPrP to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, which was not approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual QAPrPs which provide more detail for each major air monitoring program. QAPjPs are developed for environmental data operations of limited scope and duration, such as special studies, which have known beginning and anticipated end dates. These projects may involve single or multi-pollutant monitoring, and the QAPjPs may refer to the State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 39 appropriate QAPrP for the pollutant to reduce duplication of effort. In practice, a QAPrP and a QAPjP are commonly referred to as a Quality Assurance Program/Project Plan (QAPP). In 2010, the QA/QC Lead along with staff from AMU began revising the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, Air Toxics Monitoring Program, & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations QAPP which was approved by EPA Region 9 in February 2008. Completion of this QAPP was delayed due to a re-evaluation of priorities and the QAPP schedule was revised to focus first on criteria pollutantrelated QAPPs. In 2010, the QA Team began coordinating the development of a new QAPP for the new Pb monitoring program. This QAPP was submitted to EPA Region 9 as an Interim Final and was approved as such in October, 2011. The QA Team will finalize the Pb QAPP once sufficient information is available regarding the recently approved ERG analysis method. The team’s goal is to expedite the completion of the Gas, PM, and Pb QAPPs as soon as practicable, with a general goal of completing or updating one QAPP per year in addition to accomplishing other QA tasks. The instruments used in the NCore program will be addressed in several program specific QAPPs that include, but may not be limited to: the PM 2.5 and PM 10 , Gaseous Pollutants, and Meteorological QAPPs. The QA Auditor will manage PE audits on these instruments. AAS follows the EPA’s QAPP for the PM 2.5 STN monitoring program. This QAPP is undergoing update by the EPA OAQPS. Two samplers are used for collecting filter samples; the MetOne SuperSASS and the URG 3000. The QA Auditor conducts PE audits on the SuperSASS and URG 3000 four times per year (quarterly) per instrument. SOPs for ambient air quality monitors are included in QAPPs as well as at monitoring sites for technicians and operators. AAS SOPs are being revised to follow EPA’s format provided in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G-6. The DM&QA Unit Manager, QA/QC Lead and the Document Control Specialist have been working on two new SOPs regarding the SOP development and document control processes. Both documents are near completion. The goal is to provide more guidance to staff creating or editing SOPs and to establish a new document control plan for AAS documents. In addition, DM&QA is developing a centralized storage area for the electronic versions of QAPPs and SOPs to ensure they are easily assessable for all. This change is expected to improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining the writing and review efforts. 5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements AMU QC checks and QA PE audits generate data used to assess the quality of the ambient air quality data collected by AAS. The QC checks are used to assess precision, or imprecision actually, introduced into air quality data by the monitoring system. The PE audits generate data used to assess the amount of bias introduced into air quality data by the monitor. For particulate matter monitors, collocated sampling generates precision data as well. The information gleaned from precision and bias data is important for data certification and user purposes. This QA information is provided via the AMP 255 report which is generated by the EPA’s AQS database. The AMP 255 report is included in Appendix F of this plan to demonstrate QA completeness requirements as required in 40 CFR Part 58.10. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 40 The precision and bias data are reviewed for QA purposes by AMU and DM&QA staff to determine the quality of the ambient air data collected. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40 CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants. 5.2.1 Particulate Monitors – PM 10 ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 10 . Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurement and both TEOMs and BAMs are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed once every four weeks and instrument calibrations are performed at minimum once per year or more frequently if needed by AMU staff. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these samplers once every six months. Section 3.3.1 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A indicates that 15 percent of the filter-based PM 10 sites in a network must be collocated. The collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. ADEQ has six filter-based PM 10 sites and according to the rule one collocated site is required. ADEQ operates collocated filter-based samplers at Payson Well Site to meet this collocation requirement. All concentrations from the collocated samplers are reported to the AQS with parameter occurrence code (POC) 2. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day for precision measurements. Historically, ADEQ has operated two collocated sites, but with the change from filter-based measurements to continuous at Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, the need for collocation at Paul Spur was eliminated. 5.2.2 Particulate Monitors – PM 2.5 ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 2.5 . Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurements and TEOMs, BAMs and a few nephelometers are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed by AMU. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these monitors once every six months. For the PM 2.5 network, each filter-based sampling method must include collocated sampling at 15 percent of the monitoring sites operated by the reporting agency. If the area has less than four monitoring sites at least one must have a precision measurement. ADEQ currently operates six PM 2.5 sites which results in one collocated site being required. This requirement is met with the collocation of Partisols at the Nogales Post Office site. Previously, collocated PM 2.5 sampling also occurred at the JLG Supersite; however, with the replacement of the Partisol 2025 instruments with a Partisol 2000 instrument, collocation will no longer be required at this site. Section 3.2.5.6 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A requires that the collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day to ensure an adequate number of precision measurements. All concentrations from the collocated monitors are reported as POC 2. PEP audits are conducted on PM 2.5 filter-based samplers by the EPA. The PEP audit results are also used for measuring bias and are reported to AQS by the EPA. The ADEQ network has more than five filter-based sites, which requires eight PEP audits distributed evenly over four quarters. According to this schedule, all samplers will receive a PEP audit within a six year period. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 41 ADEQ operates two air samplers, the SuperSASS and the URG 3000, for the PM 2.5 STN as part of the CSN. Speciation filter samples are collected every third day. There is no collocation requirement for these samplers, but data generated from these samplers complement the data generated from the collocated IMPROVE samplers at JLG Supersite. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed. The QA Auditor audits each sampler quarterly. Beginning with 2010, all precision and bias measurements for the SuperSASS and URG are reported to the AQS by the Research Triangle Institute. 5.2.3 Gas Monitors – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2 One-point precision checks along with zero and span checks are conducted biweekly and multipoint verifications/calibrations are performed quarterly by AMU for all gas monitors. Multi-point PE audits are performed annually by QA. Both measurements are reported to the AQS. NPAP audits are conducted by EPA annually for bias measurements. NPAP results are reported to AQS by the EPA. Beginning in July 2010, the frequency of these audits increased and are now conducted on a semiannual basis. All shelters for the gas monitors contain temperature probes. The shelter temperature is checked daily via the data collection system (DCS) to verify proper operating conditions for the monitors. Shelter temperatures are required to be between 20º and 30º C. Shelter temperature probes are audited once every six months by QA. 5.2.4 Air Toxics Monitors ADEQ’s JLG Supersite in Phoenix is a designated air monitoring station for the NATTS program. AMU conducts verifications and calibrations on the samplers used to collect PM 10 metals, Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and hexavalent chrome. Calibrations occur once every six months and verifications occur on a monthly or quarterly basis. QA conducts PE audits on the samplers once every six months. The VOC sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by either ATEC or ERG. ADEQ monitors VOCs for the Urban Air Toxics monitoring program at Maricopa County’s South Phoenix site. The QA auditor does not audit the carbonyl or VOC air toxics samplers which are returned to the manufacturer annually for certification. Audits are conducted on the Xonteck sampler which is used for collecting hexavalent chrome samples and the PUF which is used for collecting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon samples. 5.2.5 Meteorological Equipment Meteorological equipment is audited by the QA Team annually. The meteorological equipment at the designated NCore site will be audited once every six months. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 42 5.3 Calculations and Reporting ADEQ submits the required AQS precision and bias report (AMP 255) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per certification guidelines and CFR requirements. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM) measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records. Audit data for both PM monitors and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly. 5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities The QA Team conducts PE audits of ADEQ monitors, PCAQCD monitors that are included in the interagency agreement regarding PQAOs, and some source monitors. 5.4.1 Internal Technical System Audits In 2010, the QA Team provided support and assistance to AMU in addressing the findings and recommendations from the Southern Regional Office (SRO) and Northern Regional Office (NRO) staff and operator TSAs. Corrective actions for a couple of complex findings are still in progress. To date, the QA Auditor conducts audits on 12 IMPROVE samplers at 11 sites operating throughout the state annually. These audits are limited to evaluating site conditions and instrument performance with occasional operator interaction. Seven samplers are “protocol” samplers meaning they are owned by ADEQ. The other samplers are owned and operated by the National Park Service or the United States Forestry Service. Currently, ADEQ does not receive funds for the audits performed on IMPROVE samplers. This schedule was reviewed in 2011 and there have been no changes to the audit services provided for the IMPROVE program at this time. In late 2009, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of an Air Toxics Team whose members include technicians from AMU, the QA Auditor, and the data management lead. The purpose of this team is to update the NATTS / ATMP / PAMS QAPP and instrument SOPs. The team meets on a regular basis to address issues related to air toxics sampling. In mid-2010, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of a Pb Monitoring Team whose members include staff from Special Projects, AMU, the AFL, DM&QA as well as the manager of AAS. The purpose of the team was to ensure all pertinent staff were able to work together to develop program-related SOPs and the program QAPP. In late 2011, the QA/QC Lead initiated the started up of a Gaseous Pollutant monitoring team which includes staff from DM&QA and AMU. The team is currently working on the Gaseous Pollutant QAPP and updating SOPs for gas analyzers. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 43 5.4.2 ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports In early 2009, the QA Team reviewed the report of EPA's PEP audit program. DM&QA staff began investigating what changes may have occurred within the PM 2.5 network to cause a shift in program performance over the last nine years. Based on EPA’s Three-Year Quality Assurance Reports for the SLAMS PM 2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program covering years 1999 through 2007, ADEQ's PM 2.5 network fell from a high rating to a low rating for bias results. While the information from the report is evaluated with caution due to the relatively low sample size used to summarize the results for Arizona, four areas are under review to identify and eliminate possible source(s) of error occurring in the network: the sampler and impactor combination, the AFL gravimetric weighing process, operator training, and the PEP audit and data assessment process. To date, AFL has participated in three roundrobins in the Gravimetric Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study conducted by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) and scored well on each. AMU is currently working on updating their training procedures for those responsible for operating filter-based PM 10 and PM 2.5 instrumentation. Evaluation on the network will continue in an effort to reduce any bias that may present. ADEQ looks forward to reviewing the comprehensive PEP QA report that EPA is working on which summarizes data over a much larger time period. 5.4.3 Technical Assistance and QA Handbook Document Development In 2010, the process of verifying flow standards used by AMU and QA underwent review. This review was initiated by the QA/QC Lead’s involvement as a reviewer on a new flow standard TAD by OAQPS. Currently, most AMU and QA flow standards are certified, or verified, annually. The calibrators used by QA for criteria pollutant gases and the O 3 standard are checked twice per year. All gas and flow rate standards used by AMU and the QA Team are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) flow standard. The flow standard TAD draft has not been released for comment by EPA OAQPS at this time. Throughout 2011, ADEQ DM&QA and AMU staff were actively involved in updating Volume II of EPA’s Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems. ADEQ staff participated in bi-monthly conference calls with EPA’s OAQPS staff, as well as EPA regional staff and other state and local monitoring staff. ADEQ continues to work with EPA and other state and local agency staff as the document is finalized in 2012. While ADEQ is currently working to establish program specific QAPPs for all air quality monitoring networks, the EPA QA Handbook serves as consistent guidance for AMU and DM&QA staff. 5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have authority to audit ADEQ's ambient air monitoring program. 5.5.1 PEP and NPAP Audits In 2012, ADEQ will continue to participate in the EPA NPAP and the PM 2.5 and Pb PEP audits. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 44 5.5.2 Technical System Audits In April 2012 EPA Region 9 conducted a TSA of ADEQ’s air monitoring program. Findings and recommendations from the TSA will be reviewed by AAS staff and a Corrective Action Plan will be submitted to EPA Region 9 following the review. ADEQ will work with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2012 TSA. EPA Region 9 is required to conduct TSAs on the ADEQ monitoring program every three years. In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for EPA. A few outstanding findings and recommendations are being addressed. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 45 Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations AAAD AAS AADT ADEQ AFL AMU Auto GC/MS AQS BAM Bext Bscat CAA CBSA CEDES CFR CIA CO CSN DCS DM&QA DQO E-BAM EDO EPA FEM FRM HAP ICPMS IMPROVE MCAQD MET MQO MSA μg/m3 NAAQS NAREL NATA NATTS NCore NIST NM NO 2 NOx NOy Air Assessment Ambient Database Air Assessment Section Annual Average Daily Traffic Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Filter Lab Air Monitoring Unit Automated Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer Air Quality System (EPA database) Beta Attenuation Monitor Total Light Extinction Light Scattering Clean Air Act Core Based Statistical Area Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development Code of Federal Regulations Class I area Carbon Monoxide Chemical Speciation Network Data Collection System Data Management and Quality Assurance Unit Data Quality Objective Environmental Proof - Beta Attenuation Monitor Environmental Data Operation Environmental Protection Agency Federal Equivalent Method Federal Reference Method Hazardous Air Pollutants Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments Maricopa County Air Quality Department Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) Measurement Quality Objective Metropolitan Statistical Area Micrograms per Cubic Meter National Ambient Air Quality Standard National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory National Air Toxics Assessment National Air Toxics Trends Station National Core multipollutant monitoring stations National Institute of Standards and Technology National Monument Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrogen oxides Reactive Nitrogen Oxides State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 46 NPAP NPS NRO NWS O3 OAQPS PAHs PAMS Pb PCAQCD PDEQ PE PEP PM PM 10 PM coarse PM 2.5 POC ppb ppm PQAO PSD PWEI QA QAPP QAPjP QAPrP QC QMP RASS SEMARNAT SIP SLAMS SO 2 SOP SPM SRO STN TAD TEOM TSA USFS VOC National Performance Audit Program National Park Service Northern Regional Office National Weather Service Ozone Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Lead Pinal County Air Quality Control District Pima County Department of Environmental Quality Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Program Particulate Matter Particulate Matter < 10 microns Coarse Particulate Matter 2.5 to 10 microns aerodynamic diameter Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns Parameter Occurrence Code Parts Per Billion Parts Per Million Primary Quality Assurance Organization Prevention of Significant Deterioration Populated Weighted Emissions Index Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Program and/or Project Plan Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Assurance Project Plan Quality Control Quality Management Plan Radar Acoustic Sounding System Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources State Implementation Plan State and Local Air Monitoring Stations Sulfur Dioxide Standard Operating Procedure Special Purpose Monitor Southern Regional Office Speciation Trends Network Technical Assistance Document Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technical System Audit United States Forest Service Volatile Organic Compound State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 47 Appendix B – Network Maps There are eleven maps in this section illustrating the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:  CO Network  NO 2 Network  O 3 Network  SO 2 Network  Pb Network  PM 10 Network  PM 2.5 Network  PM 2.5 EBAM Network  Meteorological Network  Urban Visibility Network  IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 48 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 49 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 50 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 51 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 52 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 53 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 54 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 55 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 56 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 57 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 58 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 59 Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors). Only those monitors that are in operation at the time that this network plan was created are included in this appendix. Monitors that are proposed to be installed or those that were discontinued prior to the creation of this network plan are not included in this appendix. Since individual pollutants or networks have specific monitoring or siting criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout a program or network. See Appendix D for detailed information on specific monitoring sites. NON-REGULATORY NETWORKS Meteorology Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................63 Wind...............................................................................................................................................65 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................67 NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO ..................................................................................................................................................68 NO 2 ................................................................................................................................................69 O 3 ...................................................................................................................................................70 SO 2 .................................................................................................................................................71 Pb ...................................................................................................................................................72 PM 10 ...............................................................................................................................................73 PM 2.5 ..............................................................................................................................................75 National Core Multi-Pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore)........................................................76 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ............................................................78 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................80 SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK (STN) ...........................................................................................81 AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ........................................................................................82 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)..............................................................................83 VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera ...........................................................................................................................................84 Nephelometer.................................................................................................................................85 Transmissometer ............................................................................................................................86 Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................87 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................88 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 60 Definitions for Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument start date Instrument location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees The pollutant(s) or the atmospheric parameter(s) being monitored at the site Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (maximum concentration, population exposure, sourceoriented, background, transport, visibility or welfare based) Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site Specific make and model of physical devise used to collect air samples or take measurements The date that the current type of instrument (i.e. method) began operation at the site The physical location of the instrument within the site (e.g. rooftop, shelter, tower, etc.) The method used to analyze collected pollutant or collect measurements An AQS code representing a particular method for collecting samples of the specified pollutant parameter Frequency the instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. hourly, daily, 1-in-3, 1-in-6, etc.) Length of time instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. 1hour, 24-hour, etc.) Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout a given year (typically expressed as a range of months) Distance the probe is from the ground in meters (O 3 and SO 2 probes must be between 2 and 15 meters; others pollutants must be between 2 to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters) Horizontal or vertical distance probe is from the supporting structure in meters Type of material probe is made of (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 must have FEP Teflon or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VOCs must be borosilicate glass or stainless steel) Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds) Distance the instrument is from the closest obstruction(s) in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance the instrument is from the nearest tree in meters (must be a minimum of 10 meters from drip line) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 61 Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Flow rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? NPAP audit monitor? Data Submitted to AQS? Data Submitted to AirNOW? Protocol Site? Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is free from obstructions (minimum of 270°) Distance between the centers of collocated instruments in meters (must be between 1 and 4 meters) An indication as to whether the site has a climate controlled area for the particular monitor (Yes or No) Frequency at which zero/span/precision checks occur for gaseous instruments (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for particulate instruments (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) Frequency at which independent performance audits occur (quarterly, biannually, annual) An indication as to whether a PM 2.5 or Pb monitor should be subjected to Performance Evaluation Program audits (Yes or No) An indication as to whether a gaseous monitor should be subjected to National Performance Audit Program audits (Yes or No) An indication as to whether data from the monitor are loaded to EPA’s AQS Database (Yes or No) An indication as to whether data from the monitor are loaded to the AirNOW database (Yes or No) An indication as to whether an IMPROVE monitor / site is a Protocol Site (Yes or No) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 62 Meteorology - Temp/RH CBSA Phoenix-MesaPayson Scottsdale Payson Hayden Old Miami Golf Globe Highway Jail JLG Supersite Course Population Population Population Population Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle 4/15/2011 2/2/2011 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 Rotronics Vaisala HMP Vaisala HMP MP101A Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 45C Probe Probe 155 Probe 4/15/2011 2/2/2011 1/15/2010 6/8/2011 Tower Tower Tower Tower None None None None ----Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year All year 2m 2.3 m 2m 2m 1m 0.6 m 1m 1m 32 m 0.6 m 8m -36 m 4.3 m 5m 5m 150° 210° 90° 360° N N N N Annual Annual Annual Annual N N Y N N N N N Payson Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 63 Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 8/11/2011 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe 8/11/2011 Tower None -Continuous Hourly All year 5.2 m 3m 13.1 m 7.3 m 360° N Annual N N Meteorology - Temp/RH - continued CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Sierra VistaPhoenix-MesaDouglas Payson Scottsdale Pima Yuma Paul Spur Chemical Lime Payson Well Yuma Plant Site Queen Valley Rillito Supersite Population Source Population Source Population Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 12/1/2011 5/30/1991 6/23/2003 3/30/2010 3/17/2010 Vaisala HMP Vaisala HMP Vaisala HMP Vaisala HMP Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 45C Probe 45C Probe 45C Probe 155 Probe 4/19/2011 12/1/2011 6/19/2003 3/30/2010 3/17/2010 Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower None None None None None -----Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year All year All year 3m 2.4 m 2m 2m 2.7 m 0.9 m 1m 1m 1m 1m 7.3 m 2m 7m 1m 1m 1.2 m -9m 5m 18 m 360° 250° 180° 360° 220° N N N N N Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual N N Y N N N N N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 64 Meteorology - Wind CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Tucson Payson Payson Ajo Population Neighborhood 7/1/1969 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 6/11/2003 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 11.3 m -9m 360° N Annual N N Globe Highway Population Middle 4/15/2011 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 4/15/2011 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m --360° N Annual N N Hayden Old Jail Population Neighborhood 2/2/2011 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 2/2/2011 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m -2m 360° N Annual N N Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Nogales Nogales Post JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Office Population Population Population Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 1/1/1980 RM Young 5103 RM Young 5305 RM Young 5103 Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 6/13/2003 Tower Tower Pole None None None 40 40 40 Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year 10 m 10 m 12 m 8m --5m 10 m -360° 360° 360° N N N Biannual Annual Annual Y N N N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 65 Meteorology - Wind - continued CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Source Middle 12/1/2011 RM Young 5305 Anemometer 12/1/2011 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m -9m 360° N Annual N N Payson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Tucson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Yuma Payson Well Site Population Neighborhood 5/30/1991 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 5/30/1991 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m 7m 5m 360° N Annual N N Queen Valley Population Neighborhood 6/23/2003 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 4/19/2011 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m 73 m -360° N Annual Y N Rillito Source Neighborhood 1/8/2004 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 1/8/2004 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m 20 m 20 m 360° N Annual N N Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Population Neighborhood 5/11/1999 RM Young 5305 Anemometer 5/11/1999 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m 30 m 50 m 360° N Annual N N Yuma Supersite Population Neighborhood 3/17/2010 RM Young 5305 Anemometer 3/17/2010 Tower None 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m 50 m -360° N Annual N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 66 Non-regulatory - SPM Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? PM2.5 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Population Neighborhood 8/27/2001 Met One E-BAM 7/14/2011 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 6m -10 m 15 m 300° N Monthly -N N PM2.5 Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 4/1/1999 Met One 1020 BAM 2/2/2004 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation 731 Continuous Hourly All year 8m -11.9 m 10 m 300° Y Monthly Biannual Y Y PM2.5 Prescott Prescott College AQD Population Neighborhood 7/13/2011 PM2.5 Flagstaff Sedona Fire Station AQD Population Neighborhood 12/16/2011 PM2.5 Navajo PM2.5 None Show Low Population Neighborhood 6/8/2011 Springerville Population Neighborhood 6/8/2011 PM2.5 Prescott Verde Ranger Station Population Neighborhood 8/2/2011 Met One E-BAM 7/13/2011 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 6m --7m 250° N Monthly -N N Met One E-BAM 12/16/2011 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 3.6 m -3m -300° N Monthly -N N Met One E-BAM 6/8/2011 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 5m --10 m 220° N Monthly -N N Met One E-BAM 6/8/2011 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 8m --30 m 250° N Monthly -N N Met One E-BAM 8/2/2011 Metal Platform Beta Ray Attenuation -Continuous Hourly All year 3.5 m --30 m 360° N Monthly -N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 67 NAAQS - SLAMS - CO CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/1993 Ecotech EC 9830 CO Analyzer 12/15/2011 Shelter Gas Filter Correlation 588 Continuous Hourly All Year 5m Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Line 16.14 sec 8m 5m 210° Y Every 2 weeks Annual Y Y Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 68 NAAQS - SLAMS - NO2 CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/1993 Thermo 42C NOx Analyzer 7/1/1993 Shelter Chemiluminescence 74 Continuous Hourly All Year 5m 2m Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Line 15.69 sec 8m 5m 210° Y Every 2 weeks Annual Y Y N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 69 NAAQS - SLAMS - O3 CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? None Alamo Lake Transport Regional 5/20/2005 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Population Neighborhood 3/13/2008 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Urban 7/1/1993 Prescott Prescott College AQD Population Neighborhood 3/25/2008 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Queen Valley Transport Urban 1/1/1998 Payson Tonto National Monument Transport Urban 5/22/2002 Yuma Yuma Supersite Population Neighborhood 5/6/2008 Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API Thermo 49C O3 Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer 400E O3 Analyzer 400E O3 Analyzer Analyzer 400E O3 Analyzer 400E O3 Analyzer 400E O3 Analyzer 3/10/2011 3/11/2011 4/1/2011 2/10/2012 3/16/2011 3/16/2011 3/3/2011 Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric 087 087 087 047 087 087 087 Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly March – Oct. March – Oct. All Year March – Oct. March – Oct. March – Oct. March – Oct. 5m 10 m 5m 6m 5m 6m 5m 2m 0.5 m ---2m 2m Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Line Line Line Line Line Line Line 2.95 sec 8.66 sec 15.71 sec 3.60 sec 3.46 sec 3.53 sec 4.99 sec 7m -8m -73 m -35 m 12 m 15 m 5m 12 m 3m 4m -360° 360° 210° 250° 360° 360° 360° Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 70 NAAQS - SLAMS - SO2 CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Payson Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Ridgeline Source Population Source Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 1/1/1975 3/3/2005 10/5/1995 Thermo 43C Ecotech EC 9850 Thermo 43C SO2 Analyzer SO2 Analyzer SO2 Analyzer 10/10/2001 6/1/2010 7/21/1999 Shelter Shelter Shelter Pulsed Pulsed Pulsed Fluorescence Fluorescence Fluorescence 592 60 60 Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year 5m 5m 4m 7m -2m Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Line Line Line 4.85 sec 15.64 sec 5.13 sec 7m 8m 5m 4.2 m 5m 5m 360° 210° 180° Y Y Y Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 71 NAAQS - SLAMS - Pb CBSA Payson Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Payson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Globe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Source Source Population Source Middle Middle Neighborhood Middle 10/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2005 10/1/2010 Tisch TE-8550-BL Tisch TE-8550-BL Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP TSP R&P Partisol 2000 TSP 10/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2005 10/1/2010 Platform Platform Metal Roof Platform ICP-MS with Heated ICP-MS with Heated ICP-MS with Heated ICP-MS with Heated Ultrasonic Nitric and Ultrasonic Nitric and Hot Block in Dilute Acid Ultrasonic Nitric and Hydrochloric Acid Filter Hydrochloric Acid Filter and Hydrogen Peroxide Hydrochloric Acid Filter Extraction (TSP) Extraction (TSP) Filter Extraction (PM10) Extraction (TSP) 191 1 in 6 24 hour All year 2.5 m -3.7 m 1.5 m 330 191 1 in 6 24 hour All year 2.5 m -3.7 m 1.5 m 330° 202 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -8m 5m 210° 191 1 in 6 24 hour All year 3.5 m --4m 180° 1.8 m N Every 12 days Quarterly Y Y N 1.8 m N Every 12 days Quarterly Y Y N -N Monthly Biannual N Y N -N Every 12 days Quarterly Y Y N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 72 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Tucson Lake Havasu CityKingman Sierra VistaDouglas Douglas Red Cross Population Neighborhood 9/2/1998 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Population Neighborhood 10/30/1996 Payson Ajo Bullhead City Hayden Old Jail Population Population Source Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 2/11/1991 11/5/1997 1/6/1981 R&P 1400AB R&P 1400 AB TEOM R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 TEOM 2/19/2009 9/2/2003 4/1/2004 4/1/2004 3/3/2009 Metal Platform Rooftop Metal Platform Rooftop Rooftop Tapered Element Tapered Element Oscillating Oscillating Microbalance Microbalance Technology Technology Gravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric 79 126 126 126 79 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Hourly 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly All Year All year All year All year All year 3.5 m 5m 3m 6m 5m -----6.7 m -12 m 10 m 8m 9m 11 m 6m 15 m 15 m 360° 360° 320° 300° 360° -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y -N Monthly Biannual Y N -N Monthly Biannual Y N -N Monthly Biannual Y N -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 73 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/1993 Met One 1020 BAM 11/10/2010 Shelter Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 1/1/1980 Thermo Partisol 2000 8/27/2003 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation 122 Continuous Hourly All year 5m -8m 5m 210° Gravimetric 126 1 in 6 24 hour All year 8m -13.7 m 7m 300° -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y -N Monthly Biannual Y N NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continued CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Source Middle 1/6/1991 Thermo Partisol 2000 12/16/1997 Metal Platform Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Source Middle 1/6/1991 R&P 1400 AB TEOM 1/12/2012 Metal Platform Gravimetric 126 1 in 6 24 hour All year 3m -50 m 5m 360° Gravimetric 79 Continuous Hourly All year 3m -50 m 5m 360° Gravimetric 126 1 in 6 24 hour All year 3m -12 m 5m 300° Gravimetric 126 1 in 6 24 hour All year 3m -12 m 5m 300° -N Monthly Biannual Y N -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y 2m N Monthly Biannual Y N 2m N Monthly Biannual Y N Payson Payson Prescott Tucson Yuma Gravimetric 126 1 in 6 24 hour All year 7m -20 m -360° Rillito Source Neighborhood 1/3/1985 R&P 1400 AB TEOM 3/30/2010 Metal Platform Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology 79 Continuous Hourly All year 5m -4m 20 m 360° Yuma Supersite Population Neighborhood 12/1/2009 R&P 1400 AB TEOM 12/1/2009 Shelter Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology 79 Continuous Hourly All year 5m 2m 50 m -360° -N Monthly Biannual Y N -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y -Y Monthly Biannual Y Y Payson Well Site Population Neighborhood 1/1/1991 Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 1/1/1991 3/16/2003 Thermo Partisol R&P Partisol 2000 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 6/30/2003 7/1/2009 12/28/2007 Metal Platform Metal Platform Rooftop State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 74 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5 CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Sierra VistaDouglas Douglas Red Cross Population Neighborhood 11/2/2000 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Population Neighborhood 8/27/2001 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/2003 Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All year 3m -9m 6m 320° Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All year 6m -10 m 15 m 300° Gravimetric 143 1 in 3 24 hour All Year 5m -8m 5m 210° JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/2003 Met One 1020 BAM 11/10/2010 Shelter Beta Ray Attenuation 170 Continuous Hourly All year 5m -8m 5m 210° -N Monthly Biannual Y Y N -N Monthly Biannual Y Y N -N Monthly Biannual Y Y N -Y Monthly Biannual -Y Y R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 4/1/2004 9/16/2003 7/1/2011 Metal Platform Rooftop Metal Roof State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 75 Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 4/1/1999 Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 4/1/1999 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 9/26/2003 9/26/2003 Rooftop Rooftop Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All year 8m -10.4 m 12 m 300° Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All year 7m -8m 10 m 300° 2m N Monthly Biannual Y Y N 2m N Monthly Biannual Y Y N NAAQS - NCore Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? CO Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/1993 NOy Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 1/1/2011 Ecotech 9830 CO Analyzer 12/15/2011 Shelter Ecotech 9843 Reactive NOx 4/1/2011 Shelter O3 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/1993 API Teledyne M400E O3 Analyzer 4/1/2011 Shelter SO2 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 3/3/2005 Pb-PM10 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 1/1/2005 PM10-2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 11/10/2010 Ecotech 9850 SO2 Analyzer 6/1/2010 Shelter R&P Partisol 2000 1/1/2005 Metal Roof Paired Met One 1020 BAMs 11/10/2010 Shelter Gas Filter ChemiluminPulsed Correlation escence UV Photometric Fluorescence 588 591 087 592 Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year All year 5m 5m 5m 5m 2m 7m 2m 2m Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Line Line Line Line 16.14 sec 13.08 sec 15.71 sec 15.64 sec 8m 8m 8m 8m 5m 5m 5m 5m 210° 210° 210° 210° Y Y Y Y Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks ----Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks N N N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 76 ICP-MS with Heated Hot Block in Dilute Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide Filter Extraction 202 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -- Difference Method 185 Continuous Hourly All year 5m -- --8m 5m 210° N -Monthly Biannual N N Y N --8m 5m 210° N -Monthly -N N Y N NAAQS - NCore continued Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/2003 R&P Partisol 2000 7/1/2011 Metal Roof PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Neighborhood 7/1/2003 Met One 1020 BAM 11/10/2010 Metal Roof Gravimetric Beta Ray Attenuation 145 1 in 3 24 hour All year 5m ---8m 5m 210° N -Monthly -Y N Y N 170 Continuous Hourly All year 5m ---8m 5m 210° N -Monthly Biannual N N Y Y PM2.5 Speciation PM2.5 Speciation Temp/RH Wind Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Population Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 2/21/2000 2/21/2000 7/1/1993 7/1/1993 Met One Super Rotronics MP101A RM Young 5103 SASS URG 3000N Probe Anemometer 2/21/2000 10/1/2009 1/15/2010 7/1/1993 Metal Roof Metal Roof Tower Tower Energy Dispersive XRF & Ion IMPROVE A TOR Chromatography & Various 831, 838, & 811 & 812 Various 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour All year All year 5m 5m ------8m 8m 5m 5m 210° 210° N N --Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly N N N N Y Y N Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 77 None None 21 Continuous Hourly All year 2m ---8m 5m 210° N --Biannual N N Y N 40 Continuous Hourly All year 10 m ---8m 5m 360° N --Biannual N N Y N NAAQS - PAMS Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? CO NOx O3 Carbonyl Carbonyl VOC Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Population Population Population Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Urban Urban Urban Urban 5/15/1999 5/15/1999 1/1/2003 7/1/1993 7/1/1993 7/1/1993 ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 Ecotech Teledyne API Carbonyl Carbonyl ATEC 8001 EC 9830 Thermo 42C 400E O3 Cartridge Cartridge Canister CO Analyzer NOx Analyzer Analyzer Sampler Sampler Sampler 12/15/2011 7/1/1993 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/2/2011 4/1/2011 Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Gas Filter ChemiluminCorrelation escence UV Photometric TO-11A TO-11A TO-14 588 74 202 202 126 087 Continuous Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Hourly Hourly Hourly 24 hour 3 - 3 hour 24 hour All Year All Year All Year All year All year June – Aug. 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 4.5 m ------Borosilicate Borosilicate Borosilicate Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Glass Funnel / Glass Funnel / Glass Funnel / Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Funnel / FEP Teflon FEP Teflon FEP Teflon Teflon Sample Teflon Sample Stainless Steel Sample Line Sample Line Sample Line Line Line Sample Line 16.14 sec 15.69 sec 15.71 sec ---8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° Y Y Y Y Y Y Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual -Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 78 O3 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Queen Valley Transport Urban 1/1/1998 Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer 3/16/2011 Shelter UV Photometric 087 Continuous Hourly March – Oct. 5m -Borosilicate Glass Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Line 3.46 sec 73 m 3m 360° Y Every 2 weeks Annual Y Y Y NAAQS - PAMS continued Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency NPAP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? NOy VOC Delta Temp Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Vehicle Emissions Queen Valley Queen Valley Laboratory Transport Transport Population Urban Urban Neighborhood 1/1/1998 5/20/2001 8/20/2004 Met One 8001 RM Young RTD Thermo 42C TL Canister 7627 Delta Reactive NOx Sampler Temp System 5/9/2011 6/1/2010 8/20/2004 Shelter Shelter Tower Chemiluminescence TO-14 None 574 126 810 Continuous 1 in 6 Continuous Hourly Hourly 24 hour June – Aug. June – Aug. All year 5m 5m 2m&9m --1m Borosilicate Stainless Steel Glass Funnel / Funnel / FEP Teflon Stainless Steel Sample Line Sample Line ----73 m 30 m 30 m 3m 3m 50 m 360° 360° 360° Y Y N Every 2 weeks --Annual Every 3 Years Annual Y N N Y Y N N N N Total Horizontal Ultraviolet Solar Solar Radiation Radiation Wind Profiler Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Emissions Emissions Emissions Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 6/18/1999 8/20/2004 1/1/1998 Epply TUVR Visalia Li-Cor LI-200S2 Ultraviolet LAP-3000 Pyranometer Sensor Wind Profiler 6/18/1999 8/20/2004 1/1/1998 Tower Tower Ground None 11 Continuous Hourly All year 5m 0.5 m None 11 Continuous Hourly All year 5m 0.5 m None -Continuous Hourly All year --- --30 m 50 m 360° N --N Y N --35 m 50 m 360° N --N Y N --5m 50 m 360° N --N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 79 NAAQS - SPM Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency PEP audit monitor? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? PM10 Nogales Nogales Post Office Population Neighborhood 1/1/1980 Met One 1020 BAM 2/2/2004 Rooftop Beta Ray Attenuation 122 Continuous Hourly All year 7m -8m 12 m 300° Y Monthly Biannual -Y Y PM2.5 Prescott PM2.5 Yuma Prescott Valley Population Neighborhood 12/28/2007 Thermo Partisol 2000 12/28/2007 Rooftop Yuma Supersite Population Neighborhood 1/1/2010 R&P Partisol 2000 1/1/2010 Platform Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All Year 7m -20 m -360° N Monthly Biannual Y Y N Gravimetric 143 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -50 m -360° N Monthly Biannual Y Y N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 80 STN Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? PM2.5 Speciated PM2.5 Speciation Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaJLG Supersite JLG Supersite Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 2/21/2000 2/21/2000 Met One Super SASS URG 3000N 2/21/2000 10/1/2009 Metal Roof Metal Roof Energy Dispersive XRF & Ion IMPROVE A TOR Chromatography & Various 831, 838, & 811 & 812 Various 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour All year All year 5m 5m --8m 8m 5m 5m 210° 210° N N Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly Y Y N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 81 TOXICS - NATTS Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Hexavalent PM10 Metal Carbonyl Carbonyl Chromium SVOC Speciation Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Population Population Population Population Population Urban Urban Urban Urban Neighborhood 5/15/1999 5/15/1999 1/1/2006 7/8/2007 1/1/2005 ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 VOC ATEC 2200 VOC Carbonyl Cartridge Carbonyl Cartridge Xontec 924 Toxic Tisch TE-1000BL Canister Sampler Canister Sampler Sampler Sampler Air Sampler PUF R&P Partisol 2000 6/5/2007 6/5/2007 5/24/2007 5/24/2007 1/1/2006 7/8/2007 1/1/2005 Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Metal Roof Shelter Metal Roof VOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Urban 6/6/2001 TO-15 101 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -- VOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Population Urban 6/6/2001 TO-15 101 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -- Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Funnel / Stainless Funnel / Stainless Steel Sample Line Steel Sample Line --8m 8m 5m 5m 210° 210° Y Y Annual Annual --Annual Annual Y Y N N TO-11A 202 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -Stainless Steel Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Line -8m 5m 210° Y Annual -Annual Y N TO-11A 202 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -Stainless Steel Funnel / FEP Teflon Sample Line -8m 5m 210° Y Annual -Annual Y N CARB Method 920 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -- TO-13 118 1 in 6 24 hour All year 4.5 m -- --8m 5m 210° N --Biannual Y N Stainless Steel Funnel / Stainless Steel Sample Line -8m 5m 210° N Monthly -Biannual Y N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 82 ICP-MS with Heated Hot Block in Dilute Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide Filter Extraction 202 1 in 6 24 hour All year 5m -- --8m 5m 210° N -Monthly Biannual Y N TOXICS - UATMP Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure VOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale South Phoenix Population Neighborhood 8/5/2001 ATEC 8001 Canister Sampler 5/20/2010 Shelter TO-15 101 1 in 12 24 hour All year 6m 2m Probe material Residence time Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? One-point QC check frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Stainless Steel Funnel / Stainless Steel Sample Line -12 m 10 m 250° Y -Annual Y N Monitor CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 83 Visibility - Urban Haze - Camera CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate-controlled shelter? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Estrella Mountain Estrella Mountain Banner Mesa Community Community North Mountain Medical Center College College Summit ADEQ Building Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban 7/1/2002 1/1/1993 1/1/1993 1/1/1993 1/1/1993 Olympus Olympus Olympus Olympus Olympus SP500UZ Camera SP500UZ Camera SP500UZ Camera SP500UZ Camera SP500UZ Camera 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Tower None None None None None -----Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. < 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 sec All year All year All year All year All year N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 84 Visibility - Urban Haze - Nephelometer CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Dysart Population Neighborhood 1/1/2003 Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer 1/1/2003 Tower Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 -Continuous Hourly All year 6m ---360° N Annual N Y Estrella Population Neighborhood 1/1/2003 Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer 1/1/2003 Tower Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 -Continuous Hourly All year 6m --5m 360° N Annual N Y Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Population Neighborhood 6/25/2003 Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer 6/25/2003 Tower Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 -Continuous Hourly All year 5m -30 m 50 m 360° N Annual N Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 85 Visibility - Urban Haze - Transmissometer CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Phoenix Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer Receiver Transmitter Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Urban 12/1/1992 12/1/1992 Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Optec LVP-2 Receiver Transmissometer 12/1/1992 12/1/1992 Rooftop Rooftop Light Attenuation Light Attenuation --Continuous Continuous 5 seconds 5 seconds All year All year ----290° 360° N N N N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 86 Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RH Phoenix-MesaScottsdale CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees In climate-controlled shelter? Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Phoenix Transmissometer Vehicle Emissions Dysart Estrella Receiver Laboratory Population Population Urban Haze Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood 7/16/2003 2/11/2003 1/1/1994 5/11/1999 Rotronics MP101A Rotronics MP101A Rotronics MP101A Rotronics MP101A Probe Probe Probe Probe 7/16/2003 2/11/2003 6/9/2003 6/30/2003 Tower Tower Rooftop Tower None None None None ----Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year All year 6m 6m 36 m 5m 1m 1m 1m 1m --5m 30 m -5m -50 m 360° 360° 360° 360° N N N N Annual Annual Annual Annual N N N N N N N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 87 IMPROVE CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Protocol site? Sierra VistaDouglas Chiricahua Entrance Station Visibility Regional 3/2/1988 IMPROVE 4/2/2000 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All Year 4m 1m 10 m 10 m 360° -N -N Y N N Sierra VistaDouglas Flagstaff Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Douglas Red National Park Indian Cross Hance Camp Gardens Visibility Visibility Visibility Regional Regional Regional 6/2/2004 9/24/1997 10/1/1989 IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE 6/2/2004 9/24/1997 10/1/1989 Platform Shelter Shelter Various Various Various ---1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour All Year All year All year 3m * 4m -* 2m 8m * -6m * 6m 320° * 300° -N -Annual Y N Y Flagstaff -N --Y N N -N --Y N N None Greer Water Treatment Plant Visibility Regional 2/29/2000 IMPROVE 2/29/2000 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year 4m 1m 150 m 50 m 360° -N -Annual Y N N Flagstaff Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Lake Havasu Scottsdale Scottsdale City-Kingman Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Visibility Population Population Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood 4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE 4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 Shelter Metal Roof Metal Roof Various Various Various ---1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour All year All year All year 4m 5.5 m 5.5 m 1m --7m 8m 8m 18 m 5m 5m 360° 210° 210° -N -Annual Y N N * Information not available State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 88 2m N Annual Annual Y N Y 2m N Annual Annual Y N Y Meadview Background Regional 9/4/1991 IMPROVE 9/4/1991 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year * * * * * -N --Y N Y IMPROVE - continued CBSA Site Objective Spatial scale Monitor start date Instrument Instrument Start Date Instrument Location Analysis method Method code Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from obstructions Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Distance between collocated monitors In climate-controlled shelter? Flow-rate verification frequency Monitor audit frequency Data submitted to AQS? Data submitted to AirNOW? Protocol site? Tucson Organ Pipe National Monument Background Regional 1/15/2003 IMPROVE 1/15/2003 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year 3.6 m 1.5 m 7.6 m 12 m 360° -N -Annual Y N Y Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Tucson Pleasant Saguaro Petrified Forest Valley Ranger National Park National Park Station Queen Valley East Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Regional Regional Regional Regional 3/2/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE 3/2/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 Shelter Shelter Rooftop Shelter Various Various Various Various ----1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour All year All year All year All year * 4m 6m * * 1.5 m 1m * * -73 m * * 10 m 4m * * 360° 360° * None -N --Y N N -N -Annual Y N N -N -Annual Y N Y -N --Y N N Tucson Saguaro National Park West Visibility Regional 4/19/2001 IMPROVE 4/19/2001 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year 4m 1m -15 m 360° Flagstaff Payson Sycamore Canyon Visibility Regional 9/11/1991 IMPROVE 9/11/1991 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year 4m 1m 25 m 15 m 360° Tonto National Monument Visibility Regional 4/23/1988 IMPROVE 4/23/1988 Shelter Various -1 in 3 24 hour All year 5m 1.5 m -6m 360° -N -Annual Y N Y -N -Annual Y N N -Y -Annual Y N N * Information not available State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 89 Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All current sites and those closed after July 1, 2011 are included in this appendix. Sites that were closed after July 1, 2011 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section. This appendix also contains general information about the air quality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for more detailed information on specific monitors and networks. AQS ID 80-026-1000 04-019-0001 04-012-8000 04-015-1003 04-003-8001 04-003-1005 04-013-4010 04-013-8005 04-005-1008 04-005-8102 04-005-8101 04-001-8001 04-007-1001 04-025-8104 04-013-9997 04-015-9000 04-007-8000 04-007-0009 04-023-0004 04-019-0005 04-003-0011 04-007-0008 04-001-0012 04-025-8033 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 21737 16361 16316 34961 19489 16365 16679 16503 19550 16506 21736 16707 16593 16682 16683 16323 16326 16421 16328 21298 16629 16382 16511 16480 16681 16391 16392 16317 16473 16829 16330 16446 133011 18392 SITE NAME ADEQ Building Agua Prieta Fire Station Ajo Alamo Lake Banner Mesa Medical Center Bullhead City Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Dysart Estrella Estrella Mountain Community College Flagstaff Middle School Globe Highway Grand Canyon National Park – Hance Camp Grand Canyon National Park – Indian Garden Greer Water Treatment Plant Hayden Old Jail Ike’s Backbone JLG Supersite Meadview Miami Golf Course Miami Ridgeline Nogales Post Office North Mountain Summit Organ Pipe National Monument Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South Payson Well Site Petrified Forest National Park Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Prescott College AQD Prescott Valley State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 90 PAGE 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 115 116 117 118 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 AQS ID 04-021-8001 04-019-0020 04-019-0021 04-019-9000 80-026-8012 04-005-1010 04-017-0007 80-026-0005 04-013-4003 04-005-8103 04-007-0010 04-013-9998 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 16394 16499 16474 16475 113221 142818 16512 16603 16399 16377 135133 16476 16447 16363 138696 11319 SITE NAME Queen Valley Rillito Saguaro National Park East Saguaro National Park West San Luis Rio Colorado Sedona Fire Station AQD Sedona Post Office Show Low Sonora Nogales Fire Station South Phoenix Springerville Sycamore Canyon Tonto National Monument Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Verde Ranger Station Yuma Supersite State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 91 PAGE 131 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 147 148 Definitions for Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Site Name Site propose Site narrative Site Information AQS ID ADEQ ID Address County CBSA Surrounding area Distance to road Traffic count Groundcover Latitude Longitude Elevation Site Established Date Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Reason for air quality monitoring at the site Brief summary of the site location and surroundings Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database Unique identifier from the AZURITE / AAAD database for each monitoring site Physical address or cross streets of the monitoring site Arizona county the monitor is located within Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Description of area around monitoring site (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, desert, forest, mobile, blighted area, and military reservation) Distance and direction from the edge of the road to the instrument ADOT supplied traffic count for the nearest major road (data obtained in 2010) Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement, rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.) The North/South geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The East/West geographic location of a site in decimal degrees The vertical distance above sea level of the site in meters Date site was first used as a monitoring site Monitoring Information Monitor The pollutant(s) or the atmospheric parameter(s) being monitored at the site Network The set of monitors collecting air samples or taking measurements to which this monitor is associated within ADEQs various networks (e.g. SLAMS, NCORE, CSN, PAMS, SPM, NATTS, IMPROVE, or Urban Haze) Objective A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (maximum concentration, population exposure, sourceoriented, background, transport, visibility or welfare based) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Monitor start date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 92 Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Photos Aerial View Site View Specific make and model of physical devise that is used to collect air samples or take measurements The date that the current type of instrument (i.e. method) began operation at the site Image of site and the surrounding area (using Google Earth) Most current photo of monitors at the site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 93 ADEQ Building Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of the building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 kilometers to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/came1/index.html. The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 84 m – S Elevation 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 21737 Rooftop 33.4483 -112.0878 329 m 07/01/2002 Monitoring Information Visibility Urban Haze Visibility Urban 07/01/2002 Olympus SP500UZ Camera 07/01/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 94 Agua Prieta Fire Station Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located approximately 640 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is primarily residential. This site is used as a comparison to the Douglas Red Cross site as part of the border studies. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints. Site Information AQS ID 80-026-1000 ADEQ ID Address Calle 6 & Ave. 15 Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 6m–W Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 Wind Non-regulatory Non-regulatory Non-regulatory SPM SPM SPM Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1995 04/11/2010 12/18/1998 RM Young Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 5103 04/11/2010 04/11/2010 12/18/1998 16361 Rooftop 31.3283 -109.5472 1,200 m 01/01/1995 Temp/RH Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 12/18/1998 Vaisala HMP 45C 12/18/1998 Site Photos Roof of Aqua Prieta Fire Station – 12/2004 Aerial view of Agua Prieta Fire Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 95 Ajo Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located at the Pima County Maintenance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest structure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lies the stabilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo mining operation which closed in 1985. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 109 m – E Elevation Traffic count 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16316 Gravel 32.3820 -112.8575 515 m 07/01/1969 Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind SLAMS MET Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 02/11/1991 07/01/1969 RM Young R&P 1400AB 5103 TEOM Anemometer 02/19/2009 06/11/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 03/2009 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 96 Alamo Lake Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting. The site was established to replace the Hillside site and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49 km north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter. Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID Address Alamo Lake State Park County La Paz Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 30 m – E Elevation Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 34961 Gravel 34.2439 -113.5586 403 m 05/20/2005 Monitoring Information O3 SLAMS Transport Regional 05/20/2005 Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer 03/10/2011 Site Photos Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the east – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 97 Banner Mesa Medical Center Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/supm1/index.html. The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential, with some commercial areas. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 20 m – N Elevation 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date 19489 Rooftop 33.4335 -111.8428 454 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Urban Haze Visibility Urban 01/01/1993 Olympus SP500UZ Camera 07/01/2003 Site Photos No Photo Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 98 Bullhead City Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport. Site Information AQS ID 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429 County Mohave Groundcover CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road ~30 m – W Elevation Traffic count 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16365 Rooftop 35.1539 -114.5661 156 m 11/01/1997 Monitoring Information PM 10 SLAMS Population Neighborhood 11/05/1997 R&P Partisol 2000 09/02/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office looking north – 04/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 99 Chiricahua Entrance Station Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3.8 km to the northeast. Site Information AQS ID 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID Address 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 99 m – E Elevation Traffic count 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16679 Dirt/Rocks 32.0094 -109.3891 1,570 m 01/01/1988 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 03/02/1988 IMPROVE 04/02/2000 Site Photos Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 100 Douglas Red Cross Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located at the Red Cross building on the south side of 15th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS database, a second AQS ID was created (04-003-9000) for IMPROVE data. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID th Address 1445 E. 15 St. Douglas, AZ 85607 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 30 m – N Elevation th Traffic count 2,320 – 14 St. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16503 Dirt/Grass 31.3492 -109.5396 1,231 m 09/01/1998 Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 Aerosol SLAMS SLAMS IMPROVE Population Population Visibility Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 06/02/2004 R&P Partisol R&P Partisol IMPROVE 2000 2000 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 06/02/2004 Site Photos Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 01/2012 Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 101 Dysart Site Purpose: monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting. The site is located in the Maricopa County Facility Maintenance Yard at the corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 14 m – W Elevation Traffic count 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 19550 Gravel 33.6370 -112.3393 357 m 01/01/2003 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Urban Haze Urban Haze Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/2003 07/16/2003 Optec NGN 2 Rotronics Nephelometer MP101A Probe 01/01/2003 07/16/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 02/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 102 Estrella Site Purpose: monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting. The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estrella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Recreation Area Longitude Distance to road 258 m – N Elevation Traffic count 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16506 Grass/Gravel 33.3833 -112.3728 277 m 01/01/1995 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Urban Haze Urban Haze Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/2003 02/11/2003 Optec NGN 2 Rotronics Nephelometer MP101A Probe 01/01/2003 02/11/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 02/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 103 Estrella Mountain Community College Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. One high-resolution digital camera points to the Estrella Mountains, which lies 11 km to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/esmo1/index.html. The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 155 m – S Elevation 7,280 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 21736 Rooftop 33.4836 -112.3503 305 m 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Urban Haze Visibility Urban 01/01/1993 Olympus SP500UZ Camera 07/01/2003 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 104 Flagstaff Middle School Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information. The site is west of Bonito Road on the rooftop of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 70 m – E Elevation Traffic count 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date Monitoring Information PM 10 16707 Rooftop 35.2061 -111.6528 2,120 m 10/29/1996 Monitor O3 Network SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Population Neighborhood 03/13/2008 Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer 03/11/2011 Population Neighborhood 10/30/1996 Population Neighborhood 08/27/2001 PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 08/27/2001 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 Met One E-BAM 04/01/2004 09/16/2003 07/14/2011 Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date PM 2.5 Site Photos Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff Middle School – 04/2008 Aerial view of Flagstaff Middle School State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 105 Globe Highway Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. This site is the location of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site. The site is located on the southwest end of a small canyon and is located approximately 1 km to the east/southeast of the ASARCO smelting facility. Due to its proximity to the end of the canyon, the site may be influenced by both broad and local meteorological conditions. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude Distance to road 5m–W Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16593 Gravel 33.002 -110.765 602 m 01/01/1975 Monitoring Information Pb Wind Temp/RH SLAMS MET MET Source Population Population Middle Middle Middle 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011 RM Young Tisch TE-8550Vaisala 5103 BL TSP HMP155 Probe Anemometer 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 5/10/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 106 Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID Address West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 200 m – E Elevation Traffic count 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16682 Dirt 35.9731 -111.9841 2,235 m 09/24/1997 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 09/24/1997 IMPROVE 09/24/1997 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 107 Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Gardens Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is owned by the NPS. The site is located in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the south side of the canyon along the Bright Angel Trail. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID Bright Angel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Desert Longitude 8,047 m – S Elevation 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Established Date 16683 Dirt/Rocks 36.0778 -112.1289 1,183 m 10/01/1989 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 10/01/1989 IMPROVE 10/01/1989 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 108 Greer Water Treatment Plant Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located in the Apache National Forest and is operated the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4 km to the south/southwest. Site Information AQS ID 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927 County Apache Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Forest Longitude Distance to road 1,600 m – N Elevation Traffic count 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16323 Grass 34.0583 -109.4400 2,503 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 02/29/2000 IMPROVE 02/29/2000 Site Photos Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 109 Hayden Old Jail Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. The site is located in a shelter next to the old Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved due to safety and siting concerns in 2010. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the ASARCO smelting facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site in the old jail building. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 5m–E Elevation Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information SO 2 PM 10 Wind SLAMS SLAMS MET Source Source Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 RM Young Thermo 43C R&P 1400 AB 5103 SO2 Analyzer TEOM Anemometer 10/10/2001 03/03/2009 02/02/2011 16326 Shelter 33.0062 -110.7864 625 m 01/01/1969 Temp/RH MET Population Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Vaisala HMP45C Probe 02/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail – 05/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 110 Ike’s Backbone Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the USFS. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas. The site is located on a small ridge with the Verde River and mountains nearby. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Address Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544 County Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.6825 Distance to road n/a Elevation 1,303 m Traffic count 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 04/02/2000 IMPROVE 04/02/2000 Site Photos IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone – 2011 Regional view of Ike’s Backbone State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 111 JLG Supersite Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, NCore, PAMS, NATTS, STN, AQI forecasting, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support. The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily residential neighborhoods, with I-17 approximately 1.6 km to the west. This is also an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID th Address 4530 N. 17 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 8.5 m – E Elevation Traffic count 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information CO NOy NO 2 /NOx SLAMS/ NCore SLAMS/PAMS NCore/PAMS Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Ecotech EC 9830 CO Analyzer 12/15/2011 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 Ecotech 9843 Reactive NOx Thermo 42C NOx Analyzer 04/01/2011 07/01/1993 Monitoring Information VOC PAMS/ SLAMS/NCore TOXICS NATTS Population Population Neighborhood Urban 03/03/2005 01/01/2003 SO 2 VOC TOXICS NATTS Population Urban 6/6/2001 Ecotech EC-9850 SO2 Analyzer ATEC 8001 Canister Sampler ATEC 2200 VOC Canister Sampler 06/01/2010 06/02/2011 5/24/2007 16328 Gravel 33.5038 -112.0957 354 m 07/01/1993 O3 SLAMS/ NCore/PAMS Population Neighborhood/ Urban 07/01/1993 Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer 04/01/2011 Carbonyls PAMS/ TOXICS NATTS Population Urban 05/15/1999 ATEC 8000 Carbonyl Cartridge Sampler 06/05/2007 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 112 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information Hexavalent SVOC Pb PM 10 Chromium TOXIC TOXICS SLAMS/NCore NATTS NATTS Population Population Population Urban Urban Neighborhood 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 Xontec 924 Tisch TER&P Partisol Toxic Air 1000BL PUF 2000 Sampler 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 Monitoring Information PM 10 /Metal PM 2.5 PM 10 Speciation TOXICS – SLAMS SLAMS/NCore NATTS Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/1993 01/01/2005 07/01/2003 Met One 1020 R&P Partisol R&P Partisol BAM 2000 2000 11/10/2010 01/01/2005 07/01/2011 Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Wind Speciated Speciated NCore/STN NCore/STN Met/NCore Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 RM Young Met One Super URG 3000N 5103 SASS Anemometer 02/21/2000 10/01/2009 07/01/1993 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Population Neighborhood 04/25/2001 IMPROVE 04/25/2001 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument PM 10-2.5 NCore Population Neighborhood 11/10/2010 Paired Met One 1020 BAMs 11/10/2010 PM 2.5 SLAMS/NCore Population Neighborhood 07/01/2003 Met One 1020 BAM 11/10/2010 Temp/RH Met/NCore Population Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Rotronics MP101A Probe 01/15/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 113 Site Photos Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 114 Meadview Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the north end of Meadview, AZ, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingman. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444 County Mohave Groundcover CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude Distance to road 100 m – E Elevation Traffic count 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 21298 Gravel 36.0193 -114.0684 902 m 09/04/1991 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Background Regional 09/04/1991 IMPROVE 09/04/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 115 Miami Golf Course Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. This site is the location of the TSP-Pb monitor in Miami, AZ. Freeport McMoRan also maintains two particulate matter monitors at the site. The site is located near the Cobre Valley Country Club with residential areas to the south and east and the Freeport McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 230 – E Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16629 Gravel 33.4190 -110.8296 1000 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information Pb Wind Temp/RH SLAMS MET MET Source Population Population Middle Middle Middle 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 06/08/2011 RM Young Tisch TE-8550Vaisala HMP 5305 BL TSP 155 Probe Anemometer 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 06/08/2011 Site Photos Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 05/2011 Aerial view of Miami Golf Course State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 116 Miami Ridgeline Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. The site is located inside the fence line on private property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ridge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintains a PM 10 monitor at the site. The Freeport McMoRan smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 40 m – N Elevation 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date 16382 Dirt 33.3992 -110.8589 1,085 m 0/01/1993 Monitoring Information Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date SO 2 SLAMS Source Neighborhood 10/05/1995 Thermo 43C SO2 Analyzer 7/21/1999 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 117 Nogales Post Office Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Border. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. This site is used to meet the PM 2.5 collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621 County Santa Cruz Groundcover CBSA Nogales Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 14 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 10 PM 2.5 SLAMS NAAQS-SPM SLAMS Population Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Thermo Partisol 2000 08/27/2003 Population Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Met One 1020 BAM 02/02/2004 Population Neighborhood 04/01/1999 R&P Partisol 2000 09/26/2003 16511 Rooftop 31.3372 -110.9367 1,176 m 01/01/1980 PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 04/01/1999 Met One 1020 BAM 02/02/2004 Monitoring Information Wind Temp/RH MET MET Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1980 08/11/2011 RM Young Vaisala 5103 HMP45C Probe Anemometer 06/13/2003 08/11/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 118 Site Photos Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteorological monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 02/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 119 North Mountain Summit Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The site is located on a mountain top in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera points toward South Mountain, which lies 27 km to the south. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/somt1/index.html. The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with some commercial activity to the south and east. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 16480 west side of 7th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722 850 m – E Elevation 625 m 28,210 – 7th St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993 Monitoring Information Visibility Urban Haze Visibility Urban 01/01/1993 Olympus SP500UZ Camera 07/01/2003 Site Photos Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 2008 Aerial view of North Mountain Summit State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 120 Organ Pipe National Monument Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1 km south/southwest of the national monument visitor center, which is about 35.4 km south of Why, AZ. The site is about seven meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mountain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID Address SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 400 m – E Elevation Traffic count 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16681 Gravel 31.9499 -112.8010 505 m 01/01/1971 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Background Regional 01/15/2003 IMPROVE 01/15/2003 Site Photos Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 03/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 121 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. In 2011 the meteorological instruments were re-located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site was closed. The collocated PM 10 instrument was removed and replaced with a TEOM instrument to aid in the migration of this site to continuous monitoring. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, the surrounding area is predominately desert. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 Cochise Groundcover Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Desert Longitude 50 m – S Elevation 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 10 Wind SLAMS SLAMS MET Source Source Source Middle Middle Middle 01/06/1991 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 RM Young Thermo R&P 1400 AB 5305 Partisol 2000 TEOM Anemometer 12/16/1997 01/12/2012 12/01/2011 16391 Dirt 31.3658 -109.7309 1,278 m 01/01/1985 Temp/RH MET Source Middle 12/01/2011 Vaisala HMP155 Probe 12/01/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP – 01/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 122 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South Site Purpose: meteorological support. The site is located approximately 500 meters to the south/southeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is predominately desert. In December, 2011 this site was closed and meteorological instruments were added to the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant site, which is located approximately 1 km to the north/northeast. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address South of Stonridge Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16392 Dirt/Grass 31.3543 -109.7376 1,287 m 12/21/1995 Monitoring Information Wind MET Middle Neighborhood 12/21/1995 RM Young5103 Anemometer 12/16/1997 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP South Meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP South – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 123 Payson Well Site Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located in the southern area of Payson, at a water well site. To the southeast of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use. Directly to the west, on the other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290 meters to the east is SR 87. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 80 m – S Elevation Traffic count 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 10 Wind SLAMS SLAMS MET Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1991 01/01/1991 05/30/1991 RM Young R&P Partisol Thermo 5103 2000 Partisol 2000 Anemometer 06/30/2003 07/01/2009 05/30/1991 16317 Gravel 34.2294 -111.3297 1,501 m 01/01/1991 Temp/RH MET Population Neighborhood 05/30/1991 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe 06/19/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and particulate monitor on platform – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 124 Petrified Forest National Park Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1.6 km north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surrounding area is desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Address I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ County Apache Groundcover Dirt CBSA None Latitude 35.0770 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690 Distance to road 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m Traffic count 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 03/02/1988 IMPROVE 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 125 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holiday Inn Hotel near 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID nd Address 3600 N. 2 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 25 m – E Elevation Traffic count 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16829 Rooftop 33.4901 -112.0767 337 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Temp/RH Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Urban 12/01/1992 01/01/1994 Optec LVP-2 Rotronics Trans Receiver MP101A Probe 12/01/1992 06/09/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 11/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 126 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn Hotel 4.5 km to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 120 m – S Elevation Traffic count 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16330 Rooftop 33.5253 -112.1019 340 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban 12/01/1992 Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer 12/01/1992 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 127 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by USFS. The site is located on a hilltop south of Young, AZ, within the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest. The surrounding area is a transitional zone between desert and forest. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude Distance to road 250 m – N Elevation Traffic count 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16446 Dirt 34.0908 -110.9419 1,587 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 02/10/2000 IMPROVE 02/10/2000 Site Photos Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 08/2008 Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 128 Prescott College AQD Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information. The site is located at Prescott College on the rooftop of the Mogollon Building (#307). The surrounding area is residential and commercial, with a high traffic street approximately 20 meters to the east and large trees to the west. Due to the close proximity of this site to the nearby road, ADEQ plans to relocate the ozone monitor to a more favorable location. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID Address 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 8m–E Elevation Traffic count 21,945 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 133011 Rooftop 34.5467 -112.4761 1,591 m 12/05/2006 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SLAMS SPM Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/25/2008 07/13/2011 Thermo 49C Met One O3 Analyzer E-BAM 02/10/2012 07/13/2011 O3 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 129 Prescott Valley Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the Prescott Police Department building about 1,100 meters to the north of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly residential with some areas of open desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID Address 7601 E. Civic Cir. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude Distance to road 25 m – S Elevation Traffic count 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 18392 Rooftop 34.5950 -112.3310 1,556 m 03/12/2003 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 PM 10 SLAMS NAAQS-SPM Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/16/2003 12/28/2007 R&P Partisol Thermo 2000 Partisol 2000 12/28/2007 12/28/2007 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott Police Department – 10/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 130 Queen Valley Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, PAMS network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, and IMPROVE program. The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small town of Queen Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primarily desert. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219 County Pinal Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 87 m – W Elevation Traffic count 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information O3 NOy VOC SLAMS/PAMS PAMS PAMS Transport Transport Transport Urban Urban Urban 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 Met One 8001 Teledyne API Thermo 42C Canister 400E O3 TL Reactive Sampler Analyzer NOx 03/16/2011 05/09/2011 06/01/2010 16394 Gravel 33.2938 -111.2857 668 m 01/01/1998 Wind MET Population Neighborhood 06/23/2003 RM Young 5103 Anemometer 04/19/2011 Monitoring Information Monitor Temp/RH Aerosol Network MET IMPROVE Objective Population Visibility Spatial Scale Neighborhood Regional Monitor Start Date 06/23/2003 04/30/2001 Vaisala Instrument IMPROVE HMP45C Probe Instrument Start Date 04/19/2011 04/30/2001 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 131 Site Photos Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter at Queen Valley site – 5/10/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 132 Rillito Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. In February of 2007 the site was moved from the Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping station. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 meters to the east. The site is located within the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximately 500 meters to the north/northwest of the Cal Portland Rillito Cement Plant. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID Address 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 7m–S Elevation Traffic count 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind SLAMS MET Source Source Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/03/1985 01/08/2004 RM Young R&P 1400 AB 5103 TEOM Anemometer 03/30/2010 01/08/2004 16499 Dirt 32.4143 -111.1545 626 m 01/01/1985 Temp/RH MET Source Neighborhood 03/30/2010 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe 03/30/2010 Site Photos Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 03/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 133 Saguaro National Park East Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located within the Saguaro National Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID Address 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude Distance to road 82 m – W Elevation Traffic count 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16474 Dirt 32.1740 -110.7360 938 m 06/04/1988 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 06/04/1988 IMPROVE 06/04/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 134 Saguaro National Park West Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by the NPS. The area surrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 km southwest of I-10. This is an IMPROVE protocol site. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID Address N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 27 m – W Elevation Traffic count 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16475 Gravel 32.2485 -111.2175 718 m 12/29/1996 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 04/19/2001 IMPROVE 04/19/2001 Site Photos Shelters and towers at Saguaro NP West site – 03/2003 Regional view of Saguaro NP West State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 135 San Luis Rio Colorado Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located at the Oomapas Well # 10 site at the corner of Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. The site is approximately 1.6 km south of the Arizona-Mexico border. The surrounding area is mixed commercial and residential use. *Note this site was previously used the in WASBAQS study. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information 80-026-8012 ADEQ ID 113221 Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico Sonora Groundcover Dirt None Latitude 32.4664 Commercial/Residential Longitude -114.7688 5m–S&E Elevation 41 m n/a Site Established Date 07/05/2009 Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 Non-regulatory Non-regulatory SPM SPM Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/05/2009 7/05/2009 Partisol Dichot Partisol Dichot 06/15/2009 06/15/2009 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of San Luis Rio Colorado State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 136 Sedona Fire Station AQD Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. In 2011, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was moved from the Sedona Post Office site to the Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emissions affecting the monitor. The Sedona Fire Station site is located approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona Post Office site. The surrounding area is composed of residential and commercial use. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information None ADEQ ID 310 Forest Rd, Sedona, AZ 86336 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 30 m – S Elevation n/a Site Established Date 142818 Rooftop 34.8683 -111.7633 1,326 m 12/16/2011 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 12/16/2011 Met One E-BAM 12/16/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Sedona Fire Station E-BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station – 12/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 137 Sedona Post Office Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site is located on the U.S. Post Office building and was established to assess particulate concentrations in the Sedona area. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the south and mainly hills to the north, east, and west. The site is located northeast of the intersection of SR 179 and SR 89A. This site was closed in December, 2011, when the EBAM instrument was moved 300 meters northeast to the Sedona Fire Station AQD site due to concerns about local emissions affecting the monitor. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information 04-005-1010 ADEQ ID 190 W. Highway 89A Sedona, AZ 86336 Coconino Groundcover Flagstaff Latitude Commercial/Residential Longitude 45 m – S Elevation 25,193 – SR 89A Site Established Date 16512 Rooftop 34.8667 -111.765 1,279 m 01/01/1992 Monitoring Information Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 08/02/2011 Met One E-BAM 08/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Sedona Post Office E-BAM on roof of Sedona Post Office – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 138 Show Low Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site is located on the Historical Museum building and was originally established to demonstrate compliance with the PM 10 NAAQS. Currently the site is used for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surrounding area is residential and commercial. Show Low is the commercial and tourism hub of the western White Mountains and sees a seasonal increase in population by 5,000 people. Site Information AQS ID 04-017-0007 ADEQ ID Address 561 E. Deuce of Clubs Show Low, AZ 85901 County Navajo Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 36 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 9,500 – Deuce of Clubs Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16603 Rooftop 34.2525 -110.0364 1,924 m 01/01/1974 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Met One E-BAM 06/08/2011 Site Photos No Photo Aerial view of Show Low State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 139 Sonora Nogales Fire Station Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located on the rooftop of the Fire Station in Nogales, Mexico, approximately 600 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is urban with a mix of commercial and residential use. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints. Site Information AQS ID 80-026-0005 ADEQ ID 16399 Address Diaz and Avenue Adolfo Lopez Mateos Nogales, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop CBSA None Latitude 31.3258 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude -110.9447 Distance to road 3 m – NE Elevation 1,202 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 11/01/1993 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 Non-regulatory Non-regulatory SPM SPM Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 11/01/1993 04/11/2010 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 04/11/2010 04/11/2010 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Sonora Nogales Fire Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 140 South Phoenix Site Purpose: toxics network. The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are located north and west of the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 83 m – W Elevation Traffic count 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 16377 Asphalt 33.4030 -112.0750 330 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information VOC TOXICS-UATMP Population Neighborhood 08/05/2001 ATEC 8001 Instrument Canister Sampler Instrument Start Date 05/20/2010 Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Site Photos Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 141 Springerville Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site is located on the roof of the Apache County Public Health Services District building. There is an open field to the south and west of the site, with SR 180/SR 260 to the east, and buildings to the north. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 County Apache Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 8 m – SW Elevation Traffic count 10,616 – S. Mountain Ave. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 135133 Rooftop 34.1284 -109.2891 2,125 m 09/24/2008 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 06/08/2011 Met One E-BAM 06/08/2011 Site Photos Springerville E-BAM on roof of county building – 09/2008 Aerial view of Springerville State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 142 Sycamore Canyon Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area surrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond) County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Forest Longitude Distance to road 33 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16476 Dirt/Grass 35.1406 -111.9692 2,046 m 09/11/1991 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Visibility Regional 09/11/1991 IMPROVE 09/11/1991 Site Photos Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 09/2008 Regional view of Sycamore Canyon State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 143 Tonto National Monument Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, downwind transport from Phoenix area, and IMPROVE program. The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National Forest at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roosevelt Lake about 1 km to the north. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID Address South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 17 m – NE Elevation Traffic count 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 16447 Dirt/Rock 33.6547 -111.1074 786 m 04/23/1988 Monitoring Information O3 Aerosol SLAMS IMPROVE Transport Visibility Urban Regional 05/22/2002 04/23/1988 Teledyne API 400E O3 IMPROVE Analyzer 03/16/2011 04/23/1998 Site Photos Shelter at Tonto NM site – 07/2011 Regional view of Tonto NM State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 144 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Site Purpose: AQI forecasting, PAMS, special study, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support. The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both residential and commercial, with an open field directly to the northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202). Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID th Address 600 N. 40 St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 66 m – E Elevation th Traffic count 12,740 – 40 St. Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Wind Temp/RH Urban Haze MET Urban Haze Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer Rotronics MP101A Probe 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 06/30/2003 16363 Gravel 33.4553 -111.9961 356 m 04/01/1987 Delta Temp PAMS Population Neighborhood 08/20/2004 RM Young RTD 7627 Delta Temp System 08/20/2004 Monitoring Information Ultraviolet Total Horizontal Wind Profiler Solar Radiation Solar Radiation PAMS PAMS PAMS Population Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 01/01/1998 Epply TUVR Vaisala Li-Cor LI-200S2 Ultraviolet LAP-3000 Pyranometer Sensor Wind Profiler 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 01/01/1998 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 145 Site Photos Wind profiler, meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 04/12/2005 Aerial view of Vehicle Emissions Laboratory State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 146 Verde Ranger Station Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information The site is located at the Verde Ranger Station in Camp Verde. The monitor is located on a metal platform that is on a concrete slab surrounded by dirt and rocks. Ranger Station buildings are to the northeast and northwest and there are solar panels to the east of the monitor. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 300 E. Highway 260 Camp Verde, AZ 86322 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude Distance to road 70 m – S Elevation Traffic count 6,075 – SR 260 Site Established Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date 138696 Dirt 34.5489 -111.8472 945 m 01/01/2008 Monitoring Information PM 2.5 Non-regulatory SPM Population Neighborhood 08/02/2011 Met One E-BAM 08/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Verde Ranger Station E-BAM on platform at Verde Ranger Station – 2/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 147 Yuma Supersite Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting. The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air quality monitors in the Yuma area to one site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility property. The surrounding area is commercial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 km to the northeast. In addition to NAAQS compliance, the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Monitor Network Objective Spatial Scale Monitor Start Date Instrument Instrument Start Date Site Information 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364 Yuma Groundcover Yuma Latitude Commercial/Industrial Longitude 91 m – W Elevation 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date Monitoring Information O3 PM 10 SLAMS SLAMS Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 Teledyne API R&P 1400 AB 400E O3 TEOM Analyzer 03/03/2011 12/01/2009 PM 2.5 SPM Population Neighborhood 01/01/2010 R&P Partisol 2000 01/01/2010 113219 Rooftop 32.6903 -114.6144 60 m 02/01/2006 Wind MET Population Neighborhood 03/17/2010 RM Young 5305 Anemometer 03/17/2010 Monitoring Information Temp/RH MET Population Neighborhood 03/17/2010 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe 03/17/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 148 Site Photos Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Met Tower at Yuma Supersite – 5/19/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 149 Appendix E – 2012 EPA Monitoring Schedule State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 150 Appendix F – Data Quality Indicator Report This Appendix provides documentation of the Quality Control / Quality Assurance requirements for all monitors within ADEQ’s criteria pollutant network for calendar year 2011. For a detailed interpretation of this report, see ADEQ’s 2011 data certification letter. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 151 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY User ID: BNE DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Report Request ID: 996565 Report Code: AMP255 Jun. 4, 2012 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS Tribal Code State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region 04 PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification PQAO SELECTIONS Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc. Parameter Method Duration Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality APP_A_PARAMETERS SELECTED OPTIONS Option Type Option Value INCLUDE ONLY APPENDIX A MONITORS RESTRICT TO MONITORING SEASONS MERGE PDF FILES NO YES YES GLOBAL DATES Start Date 2011 01 01 End Date 2011 12 31 Selection Criteria Page 1 Method Duration Begin Date End Date UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Notes About this Report For specific information about the fields appearing within this report, please refer to the README.txt file that is included with the WORKFILE output for this report. M If you see this value for a column in a summarized row, this means that more than one occurence exist in the summary. For example, if you have a PQAO summary that spans multiple States, you would see this value in the States column. Code Listing The following codes may be seen in the "MT" column throughout this report. Please be advised that not all of the codes may appear in the report. They are provided for completeness. Code NR P SP NC ID NA F PN VS X SU TS UP M Description NON-REGULATORY PAMS SPECIAL PURPOSE NCORE INDUSTRIAL NATTS NON-EPA FEDERAL PROPOSED NCORE VOL SCHOOL AT SECURED SUPLMNTL SPECIATION TRENDS SPECIATION UNOFFICIAL PAMS WMO Code S T I IX N CN O ST QA SS SU U W Description SLAMS TRIBAL MONITORS IMPROVE INDEX SITE NAMS CASTNET OTHER SCHOOL AIR TOXICS QA COLLOCATED SLAMS SPECIATION SUPPLMNTL SPECIATION UNKNOWN WHO Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 1-Point Quality Control Pollutant: CO Year 2011 2011 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 AZ 04-013-9997 AZ SUMMARY AZ Pollutant: NO2 Year 2011 2011 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ Pollutant: SO2 Year 2011 2011 2011 Region State 09 09 09 1 S-NC 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 26 26 26 15 15 15 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs AZ 04-013-9997 AZ SUMMARY AZ Pollutant: O3 Year PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 1 S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 26 26 26 21 21 21 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 04-005-1008 04-007-0010 04-012-8000 04-013-9997 04-021-8001 04-025-8033 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S S S S-NC S S S 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-JAN-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-DEC-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 15 15 15 26 15 15 15 116 116 11 9 11 18 14 14 12 89 89 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs AZ 04-007-0009 AZ 04-007-1001 AZ 04-013-9997 1 3 1 S S S-NC 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 26 26 26 Page 2 of 14 22 21 28 % Complete CV 58 58 58 7.09 7.09 7.09 Bias 81 81 81 2.96 2.96 2.96 + 2.51 + 2.51 + 2.51 73 60 73 69 93 93 80 77 77 4.35 4.98 4.43 3.58 4.60 4.08 2.18 3.14 3.14 % Complete CV 85 81 100 3.24 3.87 7.03 App A?: Yes App A?: Yes App A?: Yes +/- 5.74 +/- 5.74 +/- 5.74 CV CV Yes Bias % Complete % Complete App A?: Bias + +/+/+ + + + + + 3.87 4.02 3.64 3.30 3.84 3.76 2.03 2.77 2.77 Bias + 3.35 + 3.74 +/- 4.65 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 1-Point Quality Control Pollutant: SO2 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs Region State 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY 78 71 SUMMARY 09 AZ 78 71 Page 3 of 14 App A?: % Complete CV 89 89 4.97 4.97 Bias +/- 3.58 +/- 3.58 Yes UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Annual Performance Evaluations Pollutant: CO Year 2011 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State 09 Site ID POC AZ 04-013-9997 1 MT S-NC Begin Date End Date 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 App A?: Yes 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper % Btwn Conf. Limits 81.30 23.43 7.94 2.62 0 0 4 0 81.30 23.43 7.94 2.62 0 0 4 0 100 -9.08 11.64 50 81.30 23.43 7.94 2.62 0 0 4 0 100 -9.08 11.64 50 Y (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY (Levels 6 thru 10) SUMMARY 09 AZ (Levels 6 thru 10) Pollutant: NO2 Year 2011 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State 09 Site ID AZ 04-013-9997 POC MT Begin Date 1 S 01-JAN-11 End Date 31-DEC-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 09 AZ 09 Pollutant: O3 2011 Site ID AZ 04-005-1008 POC MT Begin Date 1 S 01-APR-11 End Date 31-OCT-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 09 -1.69 -1.69 0 4 0 N 3 0 4 0 0 -3.73 5.41 71 3 0 4 0 0 -3.73 5.41 71 -3.51 -3.51 -3.51 AZ 04-007-0010 1 S 01-APR-11 App A?: Yes 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 1.36 -1.90 % Btwn Conf. Limits 3 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State 09 -1.69 AZ (Levels 6 thru 10) Year 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper SUMMARY (Levels 6 thru 10) SUMMARY App A?: Yes 3.41 Page 4 of 14 0 5 0 0 Y 0 0 5 0 Y -2.02 -2.00 31-OCT-11 -1.13 4.38 % Btwn Conf. Limits UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Annual Performance Evaluations Pollutant: O3 Year PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End Date (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 09 AZ 04-012-8000 1 S 01-APR-11 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S-NC 01-JAN-11 09 AZ 04-021-8001 1 S 01-APR-11 09 AZ 04-025-8033 1 S 01-APR-11 09 AZ 04-027-8011 1 S 01-APR-11 09 AZ 09 1.92 -0.85 1.94 9.56 3.88 -0.85 0.48 -2.92 0 Y 5 0 5 5 Y 0 0 5 0 Y -1.38 0 5 0 0 Y -2.88 0 5 0 0 Y 5 15 20 5 100 -3.92 7.18 98 5 15 20 5 100 -3.92 7.18 98 -2.93 0.14 0.00 0.48 5 -0.82 0.00 -3.00 0 -1.90 -0.45 -0.80 0 0.14 2.52 0.36 -0.85 -0.24 2.52 0.36 -0.85 -0.24 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State 09 3.73 1.15 AZ Pollutant: SO2 2011 2.20 0.00 (Levels 6 thru 10) Year 2.18 SUMMARY (Levels 6 thru 10) SUMMARY 0.00 2.95 -2.25 -2.93 -2.46 31-OCT-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 0.00 -2.00 Site ID AZ 04-007-0009 POC MT Begin Date 1 S 01-JAN-11 End Date 31-DEC-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) App A?: Yes 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 0 5.08 4.24 % Btwn Conf. Limits 7.00 31-OCT-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 5.86 31-OCT-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 5.90 31-DEC-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 31-OCT-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) App A?: Yes 5.10 Page 5 of 14 5.66 4.89 5 0 0 Y % Btwn Conf. Limits UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Annual Performance Evaluations Pollutant: SO2 Year 2011 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Region State 09 Site ID AZ 04-007-1001 POC MT Begin Date 3 S 01-JAN-11 End Date 31-DEC-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S-NC 01-JAN-11 2011 09 AZ 09 -1.08 1.04 0.20 1.26 0.49 -8.38 -2.13 -8.04 -9.80 -18.30 -24.60 -7.23 -38.29 -5.97 SUMMARY (Levels 6 thru 10) SUMMARY 1-Point Avg %D / Level Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 31-DEC-11 (Levels 6 thru 10) -4.77 AZ (Levels 6 thru 10) App A?: Yes -4.77 -8.38 -2.13 -8.04 -9.80 -6.44 -0.64 -10.46 -0.20 -8.38 -2.13 -8.04 -9.80 -6.44 -0.64 -10.46 -0.20 Page 6 of 14 % Btwn Conf. Limits 0 0 5 0 Y 3 0 13 8 Y 3 5 18 8 100 -7.72 9.58 65 3 5 18 8 100 -7.72 9.58 65 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Flow Rate Verifications Pollutant: LEAD PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs Region State 38 4 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-1002 1 S 09 2011 41 4 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-1002 2 S 09 2011 38 4 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-8000 1 S 09 2011 117 12 AZ SUMMARY 09 2011 SUMMARY 09 117 12 AZ PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs Region State 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-003-0011 1 S 2011 09 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-003-0011 2 QA 2011 09 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-003-1005 1 S 2011 09 15 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S 2011 09 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-0008 1 S 2011 09 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-0008 2 QA 2011 09 12 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-1001 3 S 2011 09 7 6 01-JAN-11 30-JUN-11 AZ 04-013-8006 1 SP 2011 09 11 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-013-9997 3 S 2011 09 11 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-013-9997 4 S 2011 09 14 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-015-1003 1 S 2011 09 14 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-019-0001 3 S 2011 09 13 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-019-0020 3 S 2011 09 14 12 AZ 04-023-0004 1 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2011 09 S 14 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-023-0004 3 SP 2011 09 14 12 AZ 04-025-2002 1 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2011 09 S 14 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-027-8011 3 S 2011 09 218 198 AZ SUMMARY 2011 09 SUMMARY 09 218 198 AZ Average %D -0.06 -0.71 -1.00 -0.59 -0.59 % Complete 100 100 100 100 100 +/+/+/+/+/- % Complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 92 92 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 Year 2011 2011 Page 7 of 14 # Obs 40 39 Average %D -0.80 -0.43 App A?: Yes App A?: Yes Bias +/- 2.12 +/- 1.27 +/- 0.72 +/- 1.09 +/- 1.35 +/- 1.32 +/- 1.15 +/- 1.57 +/- 0.86 + 0.96 + 0.60 +/- 1.21 +/- 0.84 +/- 0.80 + 1.43 +/- 0.61 +/- 1.54 +/- 0.89 +/- 0.89 Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date Region State 12 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 AZ 04-007-0009 1 ID 09 12 AZ 04-007-8000 1 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 09 ID Yes Bias 4.24 3.93 4.02 3.76 3.76 Pollutant: PM10 Average %D -0.66 0.13 0.21 -0.14 0.09 0.34 -0.01 0.37 0.17 0.66 0.34 0.46 0.17 -0.23 0.65 -0.13 0.40 0.16 0.16 App A?: % Bias Complete - 1.66 100 +/- 1.88 100 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Flow Rate Verifications Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) Begin End Year # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date Region State ID-QA 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 2011 09 AZ 04-007-8000 2 36 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 36 AZ # Obs 39 118 118 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs Region State S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 13 2011 09 AZ 04-003-1005 1 S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 14 2011 09 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S-NC 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 11 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 1 QA 01-JAN-11 30-JUN-11 6 6 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 2 PN-QA 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 11 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 3 S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 14 2011 09 AZ 04-023-0004 1 QA 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 13 2011 09 AZ 04-023-0004 2 S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 14 2011 09 AZ 04-025-2002 1 S 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 12 13 2011 09 AZ 04-027-8011 1 102 109 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 102 109 AZ Average %D -0.66 -0.63 -0.63 Pollutant: PM2.5 Page 8 of 14 Average %D 0.55 0.15 0.44 12.11 0.39 0.23 0.08 -0.03 0.23 0.90 0.90 App A?: Yes App A?: Yes % Bias Complete 100 +/- 1.33 100 +/- 1.52 100 +/- 1.52 % Complete 100 100 92 100 92 100 100 100 100 98 98 Bias + 1.05 +/- 1.12 +/- 1.07 +/- 35.05 + 0.77 +/- 1.16 +/- 0.76 +/- 1.02 +/- 1.12 +/- 2.40 +/- 2.40 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits Pollutant: LEAD PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Obs / Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Avg %d -0.4 -0.1 1.1 0.2 0.2 End % Criteria #Q Obs / Q Date # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 N 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 N 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 N 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 30-JUN-11 1 1 100 Y 0 1 0 0 31-DEC-11 2 1 50 N 0 1 0 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 N 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 0 1 0 1 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 Y 1 0 1 0 N 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 0 1 0 1 Y 31-DEC-11 2 2 100 0 1 0 1 65 33 32 97 7 10 7 8 65 33 32 97 7 10 7 8 Avg %d -1.2 -0.5 -0.1 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.9 2.4 -3.8 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.7 -0.9 -0.4 1.1 1.1 0.3 0.3 Criteria % Begin End #Q # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Date Date 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2 4 100 Y 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2 4 100 Y 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2 4 100 Y 100 6 12 100 100 6 12 100 Year Site ID POC MT Region State 2011 09 AZ 04-007-1002 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-007-1002 2 S 2011 09 AZ 04-007-8000 1 S 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 AZ PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: PM10 Begin Date 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 App A?: Yes Year Site ID POC MT Region State 09 AZ 04-003-0011 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-003-0011 2 QA 2011 09 AZ 04-003-1005 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-007-0008 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-007-0008 2 QA 2011 09 AZ 04-007-1001 3 S 2011 09 AZ 04-013-8006 1 SP 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 3 S 2011 2011 09 AZ 04-013-9997 4 S 09 AZ 04-015-1003 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-019-0001 3 S 2011 09 AZ 04-019-0020 3 S 2011 2011 09 AZ 04-023-0004 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-023-0004 3 SP 09 AZ 04-025-2002 1 S 2011 09 AZ 04-027-8011 3 S 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY 2011 SUMMARY 09 AZ PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) Pollutant: PM10 Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between Lower Upper Conf. Limits -8.85 -8.85 100 7.67 100 7.67 App A?: Yes Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between Lower Upper Conf. Limits -1.95 -1.95 88 2.27 88 2.27 App A?: Yes Flow Rate Page 9 of 14 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) App A?: Yes Criteria % Begin End #Q Year # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Site ID POC MT Date Date Region State 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 100 AZ 04-007-0009 1 ID 2 2011 09 2 Y 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 100 AZ 04-007-8000 1 ID 2 2011 09 2 Y 100 AZ 04-007-8000 2 ID-QA 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 2 2011 09 2 Y 100 AZ SUMMARY 6 2011 09 6 100 SUMMARY 09 100 AZ 6 6 100 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: PM2.5 Year Site ID Region State AZ 04-003-1005 09 2011 AZ 04-005-1008 09 2011 AZ 04-013-9997 09 2011 AZ 04-013-9997 09 2011 AZ 04-013-9997 09 2011 AZ 04-023-0004 09 2011 AZ 04-023-0004 09 2011 AZ 04-025-2002 09 2011 AZ 04-027-8011 09 2011 AZ SUMMARY 2011 09 SUMMARY 09 AZ Begin POC MT Date 01-JAN-11 S 1 01-JAN-11 S 1 S-NC 01-JAN-11 1 01-JAN-11 QA 2 3 PN-QA 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 S 1 01-JAN-11 QA 2 01-JAN-11 S 1 01-JAN-11 S 1 Obs / Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 6 0 3 0 12 0 9 0 12 0 9 End % Criteria #Q Date # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Q1 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 Y 1 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 N 0 31-DEC-11 100 3 2 Y 1 30-JUN-11 100 1 1 Y 0 31-DEC-11 50 1 2 N 0 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 Y 1 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 Y 1 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 N 0 31-DEC-11 100 2 2 Y 0 94 17 17 67 4 94 17 17 67 4 Page 10 of 14 Obs / Q Q2 Q3 Q4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 6 4 4 6 4 4 Avg %d -0.8 -1.1 -1.9 -1.3 -1.3 Avg %d -0.3 0.3 -0.5 7.0 -0.2 -1.4 -0.4 0.0 -0.1 0.5 0.5 Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between Lower Upper Conf. Limits -3.65 -3.65 2.39 90 2.39 90 App A?: Yes Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between Lower Upper Conf. Limits -12.05 13.85 -12.05 13.85 100 100 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Collocation Detail Pollutant: LEAD Year Method Region 09 2011 Pollutant: PM10 Year Method Region 09 09 2011 2011 Pollutant: PM10 Year Method Region 2011 09 Pollutant: PM2.5 Year 2011 2011 2011 Method Region 09 143 09 143 09 145 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Parameter State Site ID MT Date Date POC Code 1 S AZ 04-007-1002 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 14129 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Parameter State Site ID MT Date Date POC Code 1 S AZ 04-003-0011 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 81102 1 S AZ 04-007-0008 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 81102 PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) Begin End Parameter State Site ID MT Date Date POC Code 1 ID AZ 04-007-8000 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11 81102 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Parameter State Site ID MT Date Date POC Code 1 S-NC AZ 04-013-9997 02-JUL-11 29-DEC-11 88101 1 S AZ 04-023-0004 03-JAN-11 29-DEC-11 88101 1 S-NC AZ 04-013-9997 03-JAN-11 29-JUN-11 88101 Page 11 of 14 # Valid # Req 30 # Obs # Req 30 30 # Obs # Req 30 # Obs # Req 15 30 14 # Obs 50 40 # Valid 49 55 46 54 # Valid 12 12 # Valid 60 54 97 60 52 91 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 100 7.65 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 100 14.27 100 8.51 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 40 8.37 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 100 14.53 100 14.91 100 12.84 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Collocation Summary Pollutant: LEAD Year 2011 SUMMARY Method Pollutant: PM10 Year 2011 SUMMARY Method Pollutant: PM10 Year 2011 SUMMARY Method PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Region State # Sites Required Collocated Collocated # Req 09 AZ 2 1 100 30 1 09 AZ 100 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Region State # Sites Required Collocated Collocated # Req 09 AZ 13 2 100 60 2 09 AZ 100 PQAO: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Region State # Sites Required Collocated Collocated 09 AZ 2 1 100 1 09 AZ 100 # Req 30 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Year Region State # Sites Required Collocated Method Collocated # Req 09 AZ 6 1 100 30 2011 143 2 09 AZ 1 1 100 30 2011 145 1 09 AZ 1 1 0 30 2011 170 0 SUMMARY 09 AZ 67 2011 SUMMARY 09 AZ 67 # Obs 50 # Valid Obs 40 40 % Complete 100 100 # Obs 104 # Valid Obs 100 100 % Complete 100 100 # Obs 12 # Valid Obs 12 12 % Complete 40 40 Page 12 of 14 # Obs 114 97 0 % Complete 100 100 0 67 67 Yes App A?: Yes App A?: Yes App A?: Yes CV 7.65 7.65 CV 11.00 11.00 CV 8.37 8.37 Pollutant: PM2.5 # Valid Obs 112 91 0 203 203 App A?: CV 14.81 12.84 13.53 13.53 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) #PEP # PEP # Collocated # Collocated % Year Region State # Sites Required Collected PEP Req PEP Coll. Complete Bias 2011 09 AZ 2 1 4 0 0 0 SUMMARY 09 AZ 0 Pollutant: LEAD PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) #PEP # PEP # Collocated # Collocated % Year Region State # Sites Required Collected PEP Req PEP Coll. Complete Bias 6 8 0 0 - 10.70 2011 09 AZ 88 7 SUMMARY 09 - 10.70 AZ 88 Yes App A?: Yes Conf. Limits Lower Upper Pollutant: PM2.5 Page 13 of 14 App A?: Conf. Limits Lower Upper -26.96 5.56 -26.96 5.56 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Jun. 4, 2012 Audit Strip Analysis PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: LEAD Region State Year 2011 09 AZ SUMMARY 09 AZ Lab Id 1394 1394 % Completeness Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Bias +/- 4.02 +/- 4.02 Page 14 of 14 App A?: Yes Appendix G – ADEQ PM 2.5 Sampling Frequency Clarifications and Request for Sampling Frequency Reductions This Appendix contains a copy of the letter from ADEQ to the EPA clarifying and requesting PM 2.5 sampling frequency deviations from the CFR. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 167 Appendix H – Proposed Changes to SO 2 and PM 10 Networks in Miami and Hayden, AZ This Appendix contains a copy of the letter from ADEQ to EPA regarding proposed changes to SO 2 and PM 10 monitoring in the towns of Miami and Hayden, Arizona. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 171 Appendix I – Criteria Pollutant Minimum Monitoring Requirements This appendix contains tables that summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO). Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not included within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 180 O3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Table D-2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O 3 . MSA County 2010 Census Population 2009-2011 8-hr Design Value (ppb) Design Value Site # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors Flagstaff Middle 1 1 School Prescott College Prescott Yavapai 211,033 66 1 1 AQD Yuma Yuma 195,751 73 Yuma Supersite 1 1 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 NA NA 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley , and Tonto National Monument. _________________________________________________________________________ Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 67 # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 PM 2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 and Table D-5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 2a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 2.5 SLAMS. (FRM/FEM/ARM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.1 and Table D-5) # of Active Annual 2009-2011 Daily Design # of MSA County 2010 Census 2009-2011 SLAMS Design Value Daily Value Site Required Population Annual Monitors Site Design SLAMS Design Value Monitors Value (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.9 14 0 1 Middle School Middle School Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.3 Prescott Valley 10 Prescott Valley 0 1 Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.5 15 0 1 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 NA NA NA NA 0 0 Kingman Table 2b. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM 2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non-FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.2) # of Active MSA County 2010 Census 2009-2011 Annual 2009-2011 Daily Design # of Continuous Population Annual Design Value Daily Value Site Required Monitors Design Site Design Continuous Value Value Monitors (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Flagstaff Flagstaff Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.9 14 0 1* Middle School Middle School Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.3 Prescott Valley 10 Prescott Valley 0 1* Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.5 15 0 0 Supersite Supersite Lake HavasuMohave 200,186 NA NA NA NA 0 0 Kingman # of Additional SLAMS Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed * Conitnuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMS, or ARMs Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office. _________________________________________________________________________ PM 10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Table D-4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 10 . # of Active # of Additional Max Concentration Site # of MSA County 2010 Census 2009-2011 Max Monitors Monitors Required Population Concentration Needed Monitors [μg/m3] Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 61 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 306 Yuma Supersite 1-2 1 0 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 132 Bullhead City 0-1 1 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas Red Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Golf Course, Miami Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite. _________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 181 0 0 0 0 NO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO 2 . CBSA 2010 Census 2009 Population Max AADT Counts # of Active Near-road Monitors # of Required Near-road Monitors # of Additional Near-road Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 # of Required Area-wide Monitors # of Active Area-wide Monitors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flagstaff 134,421 40,500 0 0 Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None _________________________________________________________________________ # of Additional Area-wide Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 SO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO 2 . CBSA County 2010 Census Population 2008 Total SO 2 1 [tons/year] Population Weighted Emissions Index2 [million persons-tons per year] 70 490 36 62 Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 539 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2272 Yuma Yuma 195,751 185 Lake Havasu – Kingman Mohave 200,186 319 1 Using NEI data 2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO 2 and dividing product by one million # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Additional Monitors Needed 0 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline. EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None _________________________________________________________________________ CO (Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for CO. CBSA 2010 Census # of Required Population Near-Road Monitors # of Active Near-Road Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0 Prescott 211,033 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None _____________________________________________________________________________ State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 182 Pb (Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58) Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore. NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census Population JLG Supersite Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale 4,192,887 Table 7b. Source-Oriented Pb Monitoring (including airports) Emission Source Name Address Pb Emissions Inventory (tons per Source & year) Data Year ADEQ ASARCO LLC -3.85 2010 Freeport ADEQ McMoRan Copper -3.67 2010 and Gold Inc. *consider data from the past 3 years. # of Required Monitors 1 # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 1 0 Max 3-Month Design Value* [μg/m3 ] Design Value Date (third month, year) # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed 0.27 June, 2011 1 1 0 0.06 May, 2011 1 1 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None EPA Regional Administrator-required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 183