State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan For the Year 2011 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section Final Report August 2, 2011 Publication Number EQR 11-02 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................5 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................................7 2.1 NAAQS COMPLIANCE NETWORK............................................................................................7 2.1.1 CHANGES TO THE NAAQS................................................................................................7 2.2 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) AND MAINTENANCE AREA NETWORK...........8 2.3 SOURCE ORIENTED NETWORK................................................................................................8 2.4 NCORE NETWORK .......................................................................................................................9 2.5 METEOROLOGICAL NETWORK................................................................................................9 2.6 PHOTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT MONITORING STATIONS (PAMS) ...............................9 2.7 NATIONAL AIR TOXICS TREND SITES (NATTS) .................................................................10 2.8 CHEMICAL SPECIATION NETWORK (CSN) ..........................................................................10 2.9 CLASS I AREA NETWORK AND IMPROVE PROGRAM.......................................................10 2.10 AIRNOW REPORTING..............................................................................................................11 2.11 URBAN HAZE NETWORK .......................................................................................................11 2.12 E-BAM NETWORK OF PM 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS .........................................11 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION....................................................................................12 3.1 SITE CLOSURES..........................................................................................................................12 3.2 NEW SITES...................................................................................................................................13 3.3 INSTRUMENT CHANGES ..........................................................................................................13 3.4 SUMMARY OF NETWORK CHANGES ....................................................................................15 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS.................................................................................................16 4.1 PM 2.5 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ..............................................................16 4.1.1 COMPLIANCE WITH 40CFR PART 58.10(c) ...................................................................17 4.2 PM 10 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................18 4.3 O 3 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................19 4.3.1 O 3 SEASON .........................................................................................................................20 4.4 Pb MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS....................................................................21 4.5 SO 2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS .................................................................22 4.6 NO 2 MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS.................................................................22 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 2 4.7 CO MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................23 4.8 PAMS MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS .............................................................23 4.9 NCORE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................25 4.10 SIP MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ................................................................26 4.11 SOURCE COMPLIANCE MONITORING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ...........................27 4.12 CLASS I VISIBILITY NETWORK ............................................................................................28 4.13 URBAN HAZE MONITORING NETWORK ............................................................................30 4.14 METEOROLOGY MONITORING NETWORK .......................................................................31 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE.............................................................................32 5.1 THE QUALITY SYSTEM ............................................................................................................32 5.1.1 ADEQ QUALITY ASSURANCE STAFF ...........................................................................33 5.1.2 ADEQ QUALITY DOCUMENTS.......................................................................................34 5.2 MEASUREMENT QUALITY CHECKS – PRECISION AND BIAS MEASUREMENTS........35 5.2.1 PARTICULATE MONITORS – PM 10 .................................................................................35 5.2.2 PARTICULATE MONTIROS – PM 2.5 ................................................................................35 5.2.3 GAS MONITORS – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2 ..............................................................................36 5.2.4 AIR TOXICS MONITORS ..................................................................................................36 5.2.5 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT..................................................................................37 5.3 CALCULATIONS AND REPORTING........................................................................................37 5.4 ADEQ AQD AUDIT REPONSIBILITIES....................................................................................37 5.4.1 INTERNAL TEHNICAL SYSTEMS AUDITS ...................................................................37 5.4.2 ADEQ RANKINGS IN EPA PROGRAM REPORTS.........................................................37 5.4.3 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT.........................................38 5.5 EPA AUDIT REPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................38 5.5.1 PEP AND NPAP AUDITS ...................................................................................................38 5.5.2 TECHNICAL SYSTEM AUDITS .......................................................................................38 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................39 APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS.........................................................................................................41 APPENDIX C CURRENT MONITORS BY PROGRAMS-NETWORKS-PARAMETERS ...............53 APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES ......................................................................82 APPENDIX E 2011 EPA MONITORING SCHEDULE .....................................................................134 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 3 APPENDIX F BETHUNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE REMOVAL RATIONALE.................135 APPENDIX G DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT .................................................................137 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a), requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual network monitoring plan for the year 2011. This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ will undertake July 1, 2011 through December 2011. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System(AQS) database and to AIRNow. Please refer to ADEQ's Annual Air Quality Report for summaries of these data. In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contains the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality. Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully-chosen physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:             State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) Special Purpose Monitors (SPM) Urban Haze monitoring sites Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ADEQ visibility stations located in or near mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas). Class I monitoring sites are subject to specific siting and operational guidance developed by the IMPROVE Steering Committee. AIRNow information sites Source-oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry) Meteorological sites This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E as follows:  Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring  Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology  Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring  Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 5 Results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the network is achieving its required air monitoring objectives, how well it meets data users’ needs, and how it should be modified (through termination of existing stations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet its objectives and data needs. The network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the network and ensuring that it provides adequate, representative, and useful air quality data. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 6 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or parameter, to easily compare instrument specifics across the networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's 49 monitoring sites, including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs ADEQ participates in is described in the following sections. 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network The largest compliance network in Arizona consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ozone (O 3 ), particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb). The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments that have been certified by the EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria:  Number and types of monitors required per metropolitan statistical area (MSA) by pollutant  Objectives and spatial scales  Sampling frequency  Collocation  Special NCore-related requirements  Meteorology  Probe location and other restrictions within a site  Periodic performance evaluations  Quality Assurance  Data reporting 2.1.1 Changes to the NAAQS Pb - In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μg/m3 to 0.15 μg/m3. New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to one ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites, as opposed to the 500,000 population requirement mentioned in the original November, 2008 final rule. ADEQ has installed Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective October, 2010. ADEQ is currently exploring options for Pb monitoring methods at JLG Supersite and will have this monitor installed by December, 2011. The Pb monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 7 monitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold. O 3 - In March 2008, EPA revised the eight-hour O 3 standard from 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm. Monitoring network revisions included the requirement for locating monitors in urban areas with populations between 50,000 and 350,000 and requiring states to operate three non-urban monitors. In January 2010, EPA proposed revisions to the level of the standard, requesting comments on lowering the standard to a level within 0.060 to 0.070 ppm. No changes were proposed for the monitoring requirements. The final O 3 NAAQS will be issued in July 2011. SO 2 - In June 2010, EPA revised the primary SO 2 standard by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). The new form is the three-year average of the 99th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour concentrations. It is also revoking the two existing primary standards of 140 ppb evaluated over 24 hours and the 30 ppb evaluated over a year. Additionally, the EPA required changes to data reporting requirements to include reporting the maximum five minute concentration for each hour in addition to the hourly averaged concentrations. ADEQ began collecting and processing hourly maximum five minute SO 2 concentrations in July and August, 2010. New monitoring requirements for placement of monitors were also issued, and monitors must be operational by January, 2013. The new monitoring requirements do not result in any SO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors will be covered by Maricopa and Pima County agencies and the source oriented monitors have been established for years. NO 2 - In January 2010, EPA set a new one-hour standard for NO 2 of 100 ppb. EPA is retaining the annual standard of 53 ppb. The form of the standard is the three-year average of the 98th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour average concentrations. New monitoring requirements were established including near roadway monitors in urban areas, additional urban monitors in large urban areas, and monitors in areas with populations susceptible to NO 2 related health effects. The new monitoring requirements are not expected to result in any NO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors and near roadway monitors will be operated by Maricopa and Pima County agencies. 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently not attaining one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met, but ongoing demonstration of compliance is required. Monitoring requirements for these areas are described in their associated SIPs. 2.3 Source Oriented Network Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , in and around the permitted facility. These monitors constitute a subset of the compliance monitoring network described above. ADEQ activities with respect to this network have been limited to performance audits and review of ambient data summaries submitted by the individual sources. Recently, however, SIP support has required the submittal of data by some sources to the AQS, including review of quality assurance documents kept by State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 8 the sources to support their ambient monitoring programs. ADEQ continues to work with the permitted facilities to obtain all ambient air quality data that are required to be reported to AQS. 2.4 NCore Network EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some of the missions of the NCore network are:  Tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants;  Support for long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;  Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; and  Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses. As required under 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. All ambient monitoring data required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D(3)(b) will be reported to EPA’s AQS database no later than June 30th, 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies that may be adopted in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples would include advanced communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to the current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html 2.5 Meteorological Network ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. It is a goal of ADEQ to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that are not currently equipped. Additions will occur as time and funding permits. 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, the affected states began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities and the monitoring of emissions of NOx and VOCs. Each SIP for the affected areas must contain commitments to implement the appropriate ambient monitoring network for such air pollutants. The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their SIP monitoring networks in O 3 non-attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 9 requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutant and meteorological data are the widespread non-attainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQ operates two PAMS sites, JLG Supersite and Queen Valley, to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area. EPA has recently constructed a workgroup to discuss the evaluation and possible re-invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation is extensive and includes PAMS objectives, network design, methods, and quality assurance. ADEQ has been an active participant in the PAMS re-invention process and will follow this activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ PAMS network. 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes in the risks of human exposure. These changes can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long-term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. ADEQ accepted federal funding and responsibility for this program in Arizona in 2003. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in PM 2.5 . The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs. The network has increased to 200 sites nationwide. Monitoring at JLG Supersite includes one STN speciation sampler and two IMPROVE samplers as part of the CSN network. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the IMPROVE network and are used for comparison of the speciation results from both programs. In 2009, a URG 3000N carbon sampler was added and data from that sampler was then used in place of the data from the Met One SASS carbon channel. This substitution was made as part of a national program designed to make the characteristics of the CSN carbon method match the IMPROVE carbon method more closely. 2.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Wilderness Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, which was performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 10 designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally-operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Wilderness Areas across the United States. ADEQ is involved with the operation of 6 sites with IMPROVE instrumentation. Refer to section 4.12 and Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class I Visibility and IMPROVE networks. 2.10 AIRNow Reporting ADEQ currently utilizes three urban nephelometers to approximate and report PM 2.5 data to the AIRNow Web site to provide near real-time data for public use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. The PM 2.5 value is calculated by applying a correlation developed between the nephelometer and filter-based measurements. The program is voluntary and was originally intended to fill gaps in the AIRNow network until actual continuous methods were available. Several years ago, ADEQ attempted to submit additional continuous data to AIRNow via XML format; however, despite assurances that this format would be acceptable, AIRNow was not able to process data in this format. ADEQ has recently renewed these efforts to provide data to the AIRNow system and is currently working with their contractor to modify the existing AIRNow data transfer module. ADEQ hopes to utilize AIRNow’s new AQCSV file format to transfer data to AIRNow. 2.11 Urban Haze Network Historically, ADEQ operated an urban haze network in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas. The purpose of the networks is to provide policy-makers and the public with information regarding urban haze levels, track short-term and long-term urban haze trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies on urban haze. Equipment used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. A wealth of urban visibility related data and information have been collected for more than a decade in both the Phoenix and Tucson area. Recently, due to budget cuts, this non-mandatory program was reduced to operate in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area only. This network includes the digital cameras and the nephelometers and transmissometer that support the AIRNow data reporting. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13. 2.12 E-BAM Network of PM 10 Special Purpose Monitors The current network of E-BAM continuous particulate special purpose monitors (listed in Table 2.12-1) is composed of lightweight, portable monitors typically enclosed in self-contained, environmentally sealed containers. They can be battery or solar powered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. E-BAMs continuously sample and report particulate concentrations. Data are sampled every second and concentrations recorded every minute. E-BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United Sates, to provide continuous, real-time particulate concentration data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns. E-BAM instruments are used for special purpose monitoring only. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors for temporary or short term monitoring of populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from controlled burns or for investigations of complaint responses. Historically, ADEQ’s E-BAM monitors have been configured to State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 11 measure particles ≤ 10 microns in diameter (PM 10 ). To get a better understanding of smoke impacts in these smaller communities, ADEQ is considering changing the configuration on these monitors to measure only particles ≤ 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 ). Hourly data from the E-BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx. Table 2.12-1 Location of E-BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Post Office 190 W. Highway 89A, Sedona, AZ 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION This section describes changes in ADEQ's current monitoring network that have taken place since the 2010 Network Plan was issued as well as changes planned for the next 18 months. 3.1 Site Closures Tucson Transmissometer Receiver and Transmitter sites – Both of the sites were part of the Urban Visibility Program and were closed in 2010 due to budget constraints. Prescott College AQD – The site may be closed following the 2012 ozone season. It does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. These conditions make the Prescott College AQD site unsuitable for continued, long-term placement of the O 3 monitor. In addition, environmental control issues (the O 3 instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable site will continue in 2011. It is ADEQ’s goal to run O 3 monitors at two sites in Prescott during the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. An EBAM monitor is also located at this site. At this time, it is not known if this E-BAM monitor will be removed along with the O 3 monitor. Bethune Elementary School – The following were considerations in deciding to close this site: 1. Current and ongoing budgetary limitations require the redirection of non-essential resources. ADEQ no longer has the resources to conduct monitoring that is not required by regulation. The Bethune Elementary School monitor is an SPM and not required by the CFR. 2. The Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) PM 10 network provides sufficient coverage for attainment / nonattainment determinations in Maricopa County. 3. The West 43rd, Durango, South Phoenix, Greenwood, and Central Phoenix sites provide data that are representative of the Bethune Elementary School monitor. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 12 Snowflake – An E-BAM was added in 2010 for a period of one year for smoke management information. This was a temporary study which ended in May, 2011. This E-BAM monitor will be redeployed to its original location in Show Low, AZ. 3.2 New Sites Lake Havasu City – Kingman MSA – This area (population between 50,000 and 350,000) may require an O 3 monitor to be sited to capture maximum concentration in the MSA. The location would likely be in or near Lake Havasu City. A suitable site would be selected following careful analysis of the potential sites identified by our search process and in accordance with O 3 network monitoring guidelines. While a site in the Lake Havasu area has been under consideration for the past several years, delays in the promulgation of the O 3 NAAQS and the associated monitoring rule have delayed this process. Globe Highway – This location was selected for the Hayden area Pb monitor in accordance with monitoring guidance published by EPA. EPA Region 9 has concurred with the selection of this site. Collocated TSP monitors were installed at this site in October 2010 as part of ADEQ's Pb network. A meteorological tower along with instrumentation to measure wind, temperature, and relative humidity were also installed in Spring, 2011. Miami Golf Course – This location was selected for the Miami area Pb monitor in accordance with monitoring guidance published by EPA. A Pb TSP monitor was installed at this site in October 2010. A meteorological tower along with instrumentation to measure wind, temperature, and relative humidity were also installed in Spring, 2011. Replacement for Prescott College AQD – An O 3 monitor will be located at a new site in Prescott prior to the start of the 2012 O 3 season. The current site does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. In addition, environmental control issues (the instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable site will continue in 2011. It is ADEQ’s goal to run O 3 monitors at two sites in Prescott during the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. 3.3 Instrument Changes Tucson Urban Visibility Monitors – ADEQ discontinued the operation of all nephelometers and transmissometers in the Tucson area due to budget constraints. The affected sites include Children’s Park, 22nd & Craycroft, and the Tucson Transmissometer Receiver and Transmitter sites. Supporting meteorological instruments were also closed at these sites. These instruments were shut down in May, 2010. JLG Supersite CO and SO 2 – High-sensitivity instruments for measurements of CO and SO 2 are required as part of the NCore program. These ‘trace-level’ monitors were installed at JLG Supersite in the fall of 2010. These instruments were operational by January 1, 2011. The older, traditional CO and SO 2 instruments that were previously used for NAAQS compliance were removed in the spring of 2011. Data from these ‘trace-level’ monitors will be reported to AQS in place of the traditional monitors. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 13 JLG Supersite PM coarse , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 BAMs – Two FEM BAM instruments and an electronic connection between them provide hourly PM 10-2.5 , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 measurements to meet NCore requirements. These instruments were installed in the fall of 2010 and were operational by January 1, 2011. Data from these instruments will be reported to AQS. JLG Supersite PM 10 , and PM 2.5 TEOMs – The PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and the PM 10 TEOM instruments will be removed following a period of collocation with the paired BAMs system. Simultaneous TEOM and BAM monitoring is warranted for a period of time to assess the comparability between the two instrument types. After sufficient data are collected, the PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and PM 10 TEOM will be removed. JLG Supersite PM 2.5 – The collocated Partisol 2025 PM 2.5 instruments will be replaced by a Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 . With this change, all PM 2.5 filter-based instruments in ADEQ's network will be of the same measurement method, eliminating the need for PM 2.5 collocation at JLG Supersite since the network collocation requirement is already met. This change is scheduled to occur by July 1, 2011. JLG Supersite Pb – Recent revisions to the Pb monitoring rule required Pb monitoring at NCore sites that are located within a combined statistical area (CBSA) with a population greater than 500,000. The Phoenix CBSA meets this population requirement, therefore, Pb monitoring will be required at ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite). Currently, a PM 10 low volume sampler produces Pb results as part of the NATTS program. ADEQ is currently reviewing the EPA approved methods for both TSP and PM 10 collection and analysis methods. ADEQ will continue to review these methods as they become available and determine if Pb-PM 10 will be an option at JLG Supersite. ADEQ will also determine if an ‘attainment’ designation is preferred over an ‘unclassifiable’ designation, since the Pb-PM 10 data collection method cannot be used to show attainment. O 3 Analyzers – Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, all O 3 sites were upgraded with newer API Teledyne analyzers, which have remote zero and span capabilities. These API Teledyne O 3 analyzers replaced the TEI 49C analyzers that had been used in prior years. Queen Valley Meteorology – During the five-year network assessment, it was discovered that the Queen Valley site was not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements as it lacked meteorological measurements of wind, temperature, and relative humidity. Meteorological instrumentation was installed at this site in the Spring, 2011. Hayden Old Jail Meteorology – Pursuant to the recommendation in ADEQ’s five-year network assessment to increase coverage in ADEQ’s meteorological network, meteorological measurements of wind, temperature, and relative humidity were added to this site in December, 2010. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 14 3.4 Summary of Network Changes Table 3.4-1 Instruments Closed or to be Closed in 2011-2012 Monitor Parameter(s) Report Site Name AQS ID Classification Scale Objective Measured to AQS Reason for Monitor Closure JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population SO 2 , CO Yes Replaced by NCore trace-level instruments JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and PM 10 TEOM replaced by NCore BAMS monitors JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population PM 2.5 Yes Partisol 2025 replaced by Partisol 2000 Prescott College AQD 04-025-8033 SLAMS Neighborhood Population O3 Yes Site does not meet EPA siting requirements Bethune Elementary School 04-013-8006 SPM Neighborhood Population PM 10 Yes Budget constraints, not required, redundant with other Phoenix monitors PM 10 No Planned one-year EBAM project ended Various SLAMS Various Various O3 Yes Thermo 49Cs replaced with API Teledynes Urban Haze Urban Visibility Bext No Snowflake Ozone Analyzers SPM Tucson Transmissometer / Receiver nd 22 St./Craycroft 04-019-1011 Urban Haze Urban Visibility Bscat, Temp, RH No Children’s Park 04-019-1028 Urban Haze Urban Visibility Bscat, Temp, RH No Site/City Name Tucson urban visibility and associated meteorology were discontinued due to budgetary constraints Table 3.4-2 Instruments to be Added in 2011-2012 Parameter(s) Report AQS ID Classification Scale Objective Reason for Monitor Addition Measured to AQS JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population Trace SO 2 , CO Yes Replaced older, less accurate instruments JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population PM 2.5 Yes Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 replaces collocated Partisol 2025 instruments JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population PM coarse , PM 10 , PM 2.5 Yes PM 10 and PM 2.5 BAM instruments added to monitor PM coarse , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 JLG Supersite 04-013-9997 SLAMS/NCore Neighborhood Population Pb Yes New Pb NAAQS / NCore requirement SLAMS Middle Source Pb, Wind, TEMP, RH Yes Required source-oriented Pb monitoring 04-007-8000 SLAMS Middle Source Pb, Wind, TEMP, RH Yes Required source-oriented Pb monitoring Prescott MSA SLAMS Urban or Neighborhood Population O3 Yes Replacement for Prescott College AQD Lake Havasu City-Kingman MSA SLAMS Urban or Neighborhood Population O3 Yes To be added if required by new O 3 rules SLAMS Neighborhood Population Wind, TEMP, RH Yes Expanding meteorology network Globe Highway Miami Golf Course Hayden Old Jail 04-007-1001 Queen Valley 04-021-1001 SLAMS Neighborhood Population Wind, TEMP, RH Yes Required for PAMS site Various SLAMS Various Various O3 Yes API Teledynes replaces older Thermo 49C Ozone Analyzers State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 15 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS Minimum monitoring requirements for the number of sites in SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are based on the population of urban areas. As EPA reviews the NAAQS for each of the criteria pollutants, additional network monitoring requirements for these standards as well as for the other criteria pollutants may be added. The additional requirements may be based on population or on some other metric, such as non-urban areas, micropolitan areas, or simply at the discretion of the EPA Regional Administration to adequately assess air quality for sensitive population groups. Table 4.0-1 lists Arizona's MSA populations. Table 4.0-1 Arizona MSAs as of the July 2009 Census Estimate MSA Name Area included Population Flagstaff Coconino County 129,849 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 194,825 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,364,094 Prescott Yavapai County 215,503 Tucson Pima County 1,020,200 Yuma Yuma County 196,972 4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.1-1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1-2). Table 4.1-1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 yr Most recent 3 yr design value ≥ 85% of design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS * any PM 2.5 NAAQS * >1,000,000 3 2 500,000 – 1,000,000 2 1 50,000 – 500,000 1 0 * 85% of Annual NAAQS (15 μg/m3) = 12.75 μg/m3; 85% of 24-Hour NAAQS (35 μg/m3) = 29.75 μg/m3 The frequency of sample collection is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter monitors) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1-2). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1) gives the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor. For SLAMS PM 2.5 sites with manual and continuous PM 2.5 monitors, the agency may request approval from the EPA Regional Administrator for a reduction to every sixth day and/or seasonal sampling schedule. Sites with design values ±10 percent of 35µg/m3 (31.5 to 38.5µg/m3) and sites where 24-hour values exceed the NAAQS for three consecutive years need an every third day frequency. Sites within ±5% of 35µg/m3 (33.25 to 36.75µg/m3) need to operate on a daily schedule. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 16 Table 4.1-2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ SLAMS Sites 2008-2010 24-Hour 2008-2010 Annual Current Required Site Name Design Value Design Value Sample Frequency (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Frequency Douglas Red Cross 14 7.1 1 in 6 1 in 3 Flagstaff Middle School* 13 6.1 1 in 6 1 in 3 JLG Supersite 19 8.1 1 in 3 1 in 3 Nogales Post Office 32 12.2 1 in 6 1 in 3 Prescott Valley* 11 5.0 1 in 6 1 in 3 Yuma Supersite* 14 7.4 1 in 6 1 in 3 * Indicates design value calculations do not meet completeness criteria ADEQ operates EPA approved FRM samplers at all required PM 2.5 monitoring sites. Although the required frequency for all PM 2.5 FRM monitors is every third day, ADEQ operates only the monitor at JLG Supersite at this frequency. Sampling frequencies at the other sites have remained on the original every sixth day schedule established when the PM 2.5 program was started. Consideration of travel time, shipping costs, laboratory processing workload, and little change in annual values through time have discouraged changing to the more frequent monitoring schedule. Currently, ADEQ operates continuous samplers at two monitoring sites, JLG Supersite and Nogales Post Office. A continuous PM 2.5 sampler is required at JLG Supersite as part of the NCore requirements. The continuous PM 2.5 sampler at Nogales Post Office is not an FEM, but is used to supplement the filter-based monitoring at the site so that diurnal patterns in PM 2.5 can be assessed. Since the PM 2.5 design value at Nogales Post Office is within 10 percent of the NAAQS, higher frequency monitoring is warranted. 4.1.1 Compliance with 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c) A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone, including a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 17 4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.2-1) and design values for PM 10 24-hour concentrations (see Table 4.2-2). ADEQ has delegated authority for monitoring PM 10 to Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties, giving them responsibility for the monitoring network for the MSAs within their counties. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 non-attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ operates a PM coarse monitor (difference method using BAM instruments) in the Phoenix metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. PM 10 concentrations are available from the PM 10 BAM instrument to support the multipollutant measurements at that site. Table 4.2-1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Medium High Concentration Low Concentration Concentration Exceeds 24-Hour Less than 80% of Population (MSA) Exceeds 80% of 24NAAQS by 20% or 24-Hour NAAQS Hour NAAQS more (>180µg/m3) (<120 µg/m3) (>120µg/m3) >1,000,000 6-10 4-8 2-4 500,000 – 1,000,000 4-8 2-4 1-2 250,000 – 500,000 3-4 1-2 0-1 100,000 – 250,000 1-2 0-1 0 The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e) states that for PM 10 sites, “…the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24-hour standard.” In rural areas of Arizona where there is only one PM 10 monitor to represent the area, such as Ajo, Hayden, and Yuma, sites can be considered de facto maximum-concentration sites whose operating frequencies must be determined using the Ratio-to-Standard diagram in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e). Due to the variability in PM 10 concentrations from year to year throughout Arizona, the operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. Table 4.2-2 provides the design values and sampling frequencies for ADEQ’s PM 10 monitors. Since exceptional events have a large impact on PM 10 design values in Arizona, two scenarios are provided. In recent years, ADEQ has transitioned several PM 10 monitors from filter-based methods to continuous methods. As stated in ADEQ’s Five Year Network Assessment, this transition to continuous PM 10 samplers continues to be a focus for ADEQ, but there are no plans at this time to transition additional filter-based monitors to continuous samplers. ADEQ will be removing the Bethune Elementary School PM 10 SPM at the end of the second quarter of 2011. This monitor is not required by regulation and ADEQ does not have the resources to operate non-essential monitors. A further description of the rationale for removing this monitor can be found in Appendix F. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 18 Table 4.2-2 PM 10 NAAQS Design Value and Sampling Frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 Monitors Site Name Ajo 2 Bullhead City Douglas Red Cross 1 Flagstaff Middle School Hayden Old Jail 2 Bethune Elementary School (SPM) JLG Supersite Nogales Post Office Estimated Days PM 10 >150 (μg/m3) 2008-2010 Including Events Estimated Days PM 10 >150 (μg/m3) 2008-2010 Excluding Events Current Sample Frequency Historical Sample Frequency 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 2 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 0 0 Continuous 2.2 0 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Prescott Valley 1 Rillito 2 2 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Yuma Supersite 3 3.6 0 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 Indicates design value calculations do not meet completeness criteria Filter-based and continuous records merged to calculate design value 3 Continuous records from Yuma Courthouse and Yuma Supersite merged to calculate design value 2 4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements The current EPA minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown below in Table 4.3-1. EPA has proposed revisions to the O 3 monitoring requirements, but these revisions have not been finalized. If the proposed revisions go final, there will be an affect on ADEQ’s O 3 network. Potential effects include:    greater coordination with the NPS as their monitors may be used to meet the rural O 3 monitoring requirement an additional O 3 monitor may be needed in the Lake Havasu area to meet the population requirement an additional O 3 monitor may be needed in a micropolitan statistical area to meet a new population requirement. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 19 ADEQ is basing its current O 3 monitoring network off of the current regulations in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ is aware of the potential for changes to the O 3 monitoring rule. If EPA does finalize their proposed rule, ADEQ will address these changes in subsequent network plans. Table 4.3-1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Most recent 3 year 8hour Design Value ≥ Most recent 3 year 8Population (MSA) 85% of NAAQS (0.075 hour Design Value <85% ppm) or no Design NAAQS (0.075 ppm) Value available >10 Million 4 2 4-10 Million 3 1 350,000 - 4 Million 2 1 50,000 – 350,000 1 0 ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3-2). Authority to operate O 3 monitors has been delegated to Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties. ADEQ will be relocating the Prescott College AQD monitor following the 2012 O 3 season due to siting requirements. Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, ADEQ upgraded their O 3 monitoring network by replacing the Thermo 43C analyzers with newer API Teledyne analyzers. The new API Teledyne O 3 analyzers allow for remote zero, span, and precision checks which will improve the overall efficiency of ADEQ’s ambient air monitoring group. Table 4.3-2 O 3 Design Values at ADEQ Sites Operating 2008-2010 Design Site Schedule Value (ppm) Alamo Lake April - October 0.072 Flagstaff Middle School April - October 0.069 JLG Supersite January - December 0.075 Prescott College AQD * April - October 0.066 Queen Valley April - October 0.074 Tonto National Monument April - October 0.073 Yuma Supersite April - October 0.073 * Based on incomplete data (2008) 4.3.1 O 3 Season In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), ADEQ was granted a modification to the January through December O 3 season defined in the regulation. Prior to the 2008 revision to the O 3 NAAQS, the 1998 EPA guidance document entitled, “Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an Eight-Hour Ozone Standard” supported a shorter O 3 season for Arizona (April through October) based upon data collected from 1990-1995. During the Spring of 2011, this analysis was updated to include the 2008 O 3 NAAQS, as well as more recent data. To get the best representation of the entire state, data from all O 3 sites in Arizona were used in the analysis. For the State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 20 period 2006-2010, the average number of days above 85 percent of the 2008 NAAQS of 0.075 ppm continues to support the operation of seasonal monitors (see Figure 4.3-1). However, the data indicate that the O 3 season should be extended one month to include the month of March. In 2012 ADEQ plans to extend the O 3 season by starting to monitor O 3 in March instead of April. As shown in Table 4.3-2, the current seasonal sites are Alamo Lake, Flagstaff Middle School, Prescott College AQD, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument, and Yuma Supersite. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule. Figure 4.3-1 Average Number of Days exceeding 85% of the 2008 O 3 NAAQS Total Ozone Exceedances 2006-2010 Average Number of Days > 85% Ozone Standard In All Arizona Ozone Sites Combined 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μg/m3 to 0.15 μg/m3. New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December, 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to 1 ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites with CBSA populations greater than 500,000. ADEQ has installed Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective October, 2010. ADEQ is currently exploring options for Pb monitoring methods at JLG Supersite and will have this monitor installed by December, 2011. ADEQ is hoping to use the current low volume PM 10 metals speciation sampler as the collection method. However, this collection method will be dependent upon EPA’s approval of analysis methods for this type of sampling. ADEQ hopes to use the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program for the analysis of Pb. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples. The Pb monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb monitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 21 4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates a network of three SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. ASARCO LLC and Freeport MacMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for compliance purposes to support SIP requirements. The SO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D is based on a Populated Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) that is calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO 2 . The current SO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to operate at least one SO 2 monitor in the Hayden and Miami areas to support the local facility networks. ADEQ has been working with these facilities to acquire their SO 2 ambient monitoring data for reporting to EPA’s AQS database. In the years to come, ADEQ will continue to work with these facilities to review and report ambient SO 2 data to the AQS database where compliance with the SO 2 standard can be easily monitored. ADEQ has and will continue to perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. ADEQ also operates a trace-level SO 2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. 4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO 2 monitor is located at the JLG Supersite. Authority to operate NO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 which also contain roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT also require two near roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0-1, two CBSAs (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) within the state of Arizona contain populations greater than 500,000 and therefore require at least one NO 2 near roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA also exceeds the 2.5 million population requirement, therefore two near roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. ADEQ has reviewed population and AADT data and has determined that no other areas in the state require near roadway NO 2 monitors. In addition to the near roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area-wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 22 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements which are required for the PAMS program. 4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ operates one CO monitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor is a trace level monitor that is located at the JLG Supersite to fulfill NCore monitoring requirements. Authority to operate CO monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. There are no CO minimum monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, however, continued operation of CO monitors is required until discontinuation is approved by the EPA Regional Administrator. While there are no minimum monitoring requirements for CO set for in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, the EPA has recently proposed new monitoring requirements for CO. Except for those CO monitors that are required as part of the NCore network, the proposed monitoring requirements would not require any area-wide CO monitors. However, the proposed monitoring requirements would require near roadway CO monitors in CBSAs with populations of one million or greater. These near roadway CO monitors would be collocated with the NO 2 near roadway monitoring stations. Since the Tucson and Phoenix CBSAs both exceed the one million population requirement set forth in the proposed rule, the number of near roadway CO monitors would be identical to the number of near roadway NO 2 monitors. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. The one CO monitor that is currently operated by ADEQ meets or exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for both the NCore and CO network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required for each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, carbonyls, NO x , trace level nitrogen oxides (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August. ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data. JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. To meet the revised EPA requirement for daily monitoring, ADEQ contracted with an outside vendor for the operation of an automated gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (Auto GC/MS) monitoring system for collection and analysis of PAMS VOCs data at JLG Supersite for the 2007 monitoring season. The hourly data were reviewed and submitted to AQS. A comparison with the canister samples collected for Toxics VOCs indicated the Auto GC/MS measurements were within 15 percent of the canister method results. Analysis of the 2007 results has been completed. The successful operation of the Auto GC/MS and the reliability of the results for analysis plus the additional information that continuous measurements can provide could support a decision to purchase an Auto GC/MS to be operated at JLG Supersite during PAMS season in State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 23 lieu of canister sampling. However, consultation with current users of Auto GC equipment in several different agencies confirmed that purchase and installation would cost approximately $100,000 and successful operation would require half of a full time employee on a continuing basis. Since the required manual method of eight three-hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24-hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re-engineering program are available which may include recommendations for changes to monitoring and possibly new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8-1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS and could be discontinued for the 2012 PAMS season but there are no current plans at this time. Table 4.8-1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation VOC Carbonyl Dates of Operation 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 CO O3 NOx Meteorology 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 Parameter Collection Method Canister Sampler Multi-port Carbonyl Sampler Trace CO O 3 Analyzer NOx Analyzer  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity Frequency and Duration Every 6th day, 24 Hr Every 6th day, 24 Hr, and 3 - 3hr samples (0500-0800, 0800-1100, 1100-1400) Hourly average Hourly average Hourly average Hourly average Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8-2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site. Parameter VOC O3 Table 4.8-2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation Dates of Collection Method Frequency and Duration Operation 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 Multi-port sampler Every 6th day, 24Hr, and 3 – 3hr samples (0500-0800, 1300-1600, 1600-1900) 4/1/11 – 10/31/11 O 3 Analyzer Hourly average State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 24 NOy Meteorology 4/1/11 – 10/31/11 4/19/11 – 12/31/11 NOy Analyzer  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity Hourly average Hourly average Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site A radar wind profiler collects continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights. This site also includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Barometric pressure and precipitation measurements are collected by the National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport. Parameter Meteorology Table 4.8-3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Dates of Operation Method Duration 1/1/11-12/31/11 Hourly average  Radar Acoustic Sounding System (RASS)  pyranometer (total solar radiation)  ultra-violet (UV solar)  wind speed/direction  temperature  relative humidity 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has a long history of multipollutant monitoring since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, (SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, and CSN) as well as meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9-1. All required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver request to substitute NOx monitoring for NOy. Table 4.9-1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Required Measurement Frequency/Duration Status PM 2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every Thermo Partisol is current instrument; PM 2.5 3rd day samples collected since 1999 24 hour average; MetOne SuperSASS with URG module is current PM 2.5 speciation - organic every 3rd day instrument; STN samples collected since 1999 and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals Continuous PM coarse mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair beginning 1/1/2011 Continuous PM 2.5 mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair beginning 1/1/2011 O3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E beginning 4/1/2011 CO Hourly Ecotech EC 9830 beginning 1/1/2011 SO 2 Hourly Ecotech EC 9850 beginning 1/1/2011 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC 9843 beginning 1/1/2011 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics temperature/relative humidity probe currently in State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 25 Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day operation To be determined. Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10 metals sampler. 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ADEQ is responsible for preparation and submittal of SIPs to EPA for the non-attainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is also responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for these areas with the exception of the delegated agreements with Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties and tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if they are the largest source of emissions for that area. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in some SIPs; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10-1 lists the ADEQ and source operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance. Table 4.10-1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites named in SIP). Area and County Phoenix, Maricopa Pollutant CO Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1-hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix-Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8-hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office) Douglas, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site at the Agua Prieta Fire Station in Mexico. Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline Nogales Post Office ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site at Nogales Fire Station in Mexico. Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal PM 10 (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito Both ADEQ and the source, APCC, operate instruments at this site. Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Yuma Supersite ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site in San Luis Rio Colorado, Mexico. Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 26 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary Miami, Gila SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class I areas Visibility Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe Natl Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West Natl Monument, Meadview NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon - Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon - Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Station, Saguaro National Park-East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around specific facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of some equipment at these sites and review of ambient data submitted according to permit requirements. Recently, ADEQ has begun to submit a portion of these data to the EPA AQS database to support SIP compliance. Sources are required to review their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11-1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. ADEQ staff are currently working with ASARCO and Freeport McMoRan staff to acquire and report SO 2 data from Miami and Hayden to the EPA AQS database. Table 4.11-1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Site Name Rillito Globe Highway ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Old Jail City Rillito Winkelman Hayden Hayden Hayden Junction Hayden Pollutant(s) PM 10 , Meteorology SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 AQS Submittal No Yes, begin w/ 2008 data Yes, begin w/ 2008 data Yes, begin w/ 2008 data No No State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 27 Site Name City Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon Miami Ridgeline Miami Miami Golf Course FMMI – Miami – Jones Ranch FMMI – Miami – Townsite Miami Miami Miami PCC – Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PCC – Clarkdale SE Clarkdale Carlota Mine – Sanctuary Globe TEP – Springerville – Coyote Hills TEP – Springerville – Coal Yard Springerville Springerville Pollutant(s) Meteorology PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology PM 10 mass and metals speciation PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated SO 2 SO 2 PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology NO 2 , PM 10 , SO 2 , Meteorology PM 10 AQS Submittal No No Yes Yes Yes, begin w/ 2008 data Yes, begin w/ 2008 data No No No No No 4.12 Class I Visibility Network Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation which was performed by the USFS and NPS reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. For the Class I Area designations, EPA initiated a nationally-operated monitoring network in 1987 called the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of the network is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Areas across the United States. Originally, the national State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 28 IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class I areas. During 1999-2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima and Pinal counties, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class I areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12-1. In addition to the Class I IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12-1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and collocated monitors at the JLG Supersite. These sites serve as urban IMPROVE monitors. The Douglas Red Cross site also serves as a border region IMPROVE site. See Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class I areas within the state of Arizona. Table 4.12-1 2010-2011 Arizona Class I Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Chiricahua Entrance Station Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond) ADEQ's 1996 monitoring plan for the Arizona Class I areas proposed adding optical and meteorological monitoring equipment to existing IMPROVE sites to supplement data collected by the IMPROVE aerosol monitors with continuous measurements to better characterize the air quality in these areas. ADEQ’s 2002 Class I Area Visibility monitoring plan proposed to established protocol sites (completely supported by ADEQ following IMPROVE monitoring requirements) to supplement the IMPROVE network coverage. Part of the motivation for installing integrating nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was a desire to use short term (five minutes) visibility estimates to model the visual experience of a visitor to a Class I area. A second motivation for installing nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was to provide input to mathematical algorithms that create values that can be compared with the IMPROVE measurements to test the performance of the IMPROVE algorithm. Both the original and the revised IMPROVE algorithms tend to over-estimate the lowest extinction values typical of the Arizona IMPROVE sites. Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 29 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Historically, ADEQ monitored the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas with a network of instruments to characterize and quantify the extent of urban haze. There are no established federal or state standards for acceptable levels of urban haze. ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban hazes by conducting studies during the winter of 1989-90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992-93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long-term, year-round monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. These visibility monitoring data are needed to provide policymakers and the public with information, track short and long-term trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area, and particulate filters for quantifying and characterizing particulate matter. Due to budget constraints, the Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September, 2010. Approximately a decade of urban haze data were collected in the Tucson area. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network. The urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13-1. Table 4.13-1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network - Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer (Bext) (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Tucson Network – Closed September, 2010 22nd St./Craycroft Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Children's Park Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Tucson Transmissometer Transmissometer (Bext) (U of A Clinical Science Building to Pima County Health & Welfare Building) State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 30 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network ADEQ operates meteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network (Table 4.14-1). Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network. ADEQ has recently added meteorological instrumentation at the following sites:     Hayden Old Jail Queen Valley Globe Highway Miami Golf Course As resources and funding permits, ADEQ may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network can be found in Appendix B. Table 4.14-1 Meteorology Monitoring Networks Site Ajo Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant - South Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS X No X X X No X X X No X X X Yes X X X No X No X No X X X No X X X Yes X X X X X No Solar only X X X X X State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 31 Comments For NCore / PAMS support For PAMS support For PAMS support Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind X X Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS Comments Laboratory Yuma Supersite 5.0 X No MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE EPA specifies the quality assurance requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix A. Data quality objectives, measurement quality objective and indicators, quality control (QC) checks for the monitors, calculations for data quality assessments, and data reporting requirements are part of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality management system. 5.1 The Quality System All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty, or error, associated with them. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement error, which occurs in the data collection process, and population uncertainty, which relates to the representativeness of samples. ADEQ follows EPA’s quality system approach which uses data quality objectives (DQOs) which are developed prior to sampling in a program’s or project’s planning phase. DQOs specify the amount of tolerable error that is not to be exceeded in order to make decisions using the air assessment data collected for each program’s or project’s specific purpose. To help meet DQOs, measurement quality objectives (MQOs), or performance constraints applied to air monitoring instruments, are used to keep measurement uncertainty within acceptable limits. Population uncertainty is controlled by proper site selection. ADEQ serves as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the air monitoring stations it owns and operates. Being a PQAO streamlines Quality Assurance (QA) efforts by allowing meaningful measurement assessments to take place in a shorter period of time, by allowing expensive assessments such as collocated precision sampling and EPA-required performance evaluation (PE) audits such as the Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and the National Performance Audit Program (NPAP) to take place at less sites and for results to be aggregated at higher levels that are representative of additional ADEQ sites. As a PQAO, ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring instruments to assess how well we are achieving our established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions, and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in-house PE audits. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 32 The measurement uncertainty among all ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous, as a result of common factors existing between those stations. Common factors typically include:  stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field procedures (standard operating procedure (SOP),  common calibration facilities and standards,  use of a common quality assurance project plan (QAPP),  oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and  support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters. 5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff The QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is currently composed of two full-time employees specifically dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA team which is chaired by the agency’s QA/QC and Laboratory Services Manager. The QA/QC Lead participates in technical assistance document (TAD) development with the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) when possible. Information concerning changes to TADs is communicated to the QA Auditor and AMU staff so that AAS is able to comment on pertinent QA changes that affect air monitoring quality, logistics, and resources. The QA Auditor manages the PE audit program. In addition, the QA Auditor frequently interacts with air monitoring representatives from the tribes and industrial sources for public outreach or compliance purposes. The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA requirements and/or best work practices are met. The QA Team primarily interacts with staff from the AMU and Air Filter Laboratory (AFL) both of which are within the AAS. The QA Team has numerous responsibilities that include, but are not necessarily limited to:      coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program Plans (QAPrP) which are required by EPA Region 9 and/or Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPjP) and SOPs as required by EPA OAQPS for operating air monitoring equipment, sample handling, and sample processing, conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) of ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services, monitoring third-party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA, conducting PE audits on ADEQ, source, and Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) monitors, and reviewing documents such as chain-of-custody forms, data forms, and instrument performance forms that relate to DQOs. For detailed information on the QA Team’s activities, see the Annual Audit Report. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 33 5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents ADEQ has an agency-level Quality Management Plan (QMP) that is managed by the QA/QC Manager who reports to the General Services Section in the Administrative Services Division. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. This version was approved by the Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator in November 2010. The QMP describes the quality management processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality management system that supports programs involving environmental data or technology. The QMP is an “Umbrella” document which details in broad terms the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities. Per Region 9 guidance, AAS submitted a QAPrP to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, which was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual QAPrPs which provide more detail for each major air monitoring program. QAPjPs are developed for environmental data operations of limited scope and duration, such as special studies, which have known beginning and anticipated end dates. These projects may involve single or multi-pollutant monitoring, and the QAPjPs may refer to the appropriate QAPrP for the pollutant to reduce duplication of effort. In practice, a QAPrP and a QAPjP are commonly referred to as a Quality Assurance Program/Project Plan (QAPP). In early 2010, the QA Team updated a schedule for managing new and existing QAPPs. The team’s goal is to complete two QAPPs per year in addition to accomplishing other QA tasks. In early 2011, it was determined that QAPPs for criteria pollutants need to be prioritized. The QAPP schedule was revised to reflect the highest priority QAPPs. In 2010, the QA/QC Lead along with staff from AMU began revising the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, Air Toxics Monitoring Program, & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations QAPP which was approved by EPA Region 9 in February 2008. Completion of this QAPP was delayed due to other work priorities. In 2010, the QA Team began coordinating the development of a new QAPP for the new Pb monitoring program. This QAPP is nearing completion and expected to be submitted to EPA Region 9 for approval in mid-2011. The QA Auditor audits the new Pb samplers and ADEQ participates in EPA’s PEP audit program for these samplers. Based on communication with EPA, it is not necessary to develop a specific QAPP for NCore. The instruments used in the NCore program will be addressed in several program specific QAPPs that include, but may not be limited to: the PM 2.5, PM 10 , Gaseous Pollutants, and Meteorological QAPPs. The QA Auditor will manage PE audits on these instruments. AAS follows the EPA’s QAPP for the PM 2.5 STN monitoring program. In late 2009, a new URG 3000 sampler was added for the collection of elemental and organic carbon. The QA Auditor will conduct PE audits on the SuperSASS and URG 3000 four times per year (quarterly) per instrument. An SOP for the URG 3000 from EPA is currently in-use. SOPs for ambient air quality monitors are included in QAPPs as well as at monitoring sites for technicians and operators. AAS SOPs are being revised to follow EPA’s format provided in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G-6. The QA/QC Lead began drafting a new in-house guidance procedure for SOP management and this document is still in development. The goal is to ensure each SOP contains all pertinent procedures from each Unit within State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 34 AAS so that all procedures are transparent for staff. This change is expected to improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining review efforts. 5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements AMU QC checks and QA PE audits generate data used to assess the quality of the ambient air quality data collected by AAS. The QC checks are used to assess precision, or imprecision actually, introduced into air quality data by the monitoring system. The PE audits generate data used to assess the amount of bias introduced into air quality data by the monitor. For particulate matter monitors, collocated sampling generates precision data as well. The information gleaned from precision and bias data is important for data certification and user purposes. This QA information is provided via the AMP 255 report which is generated from the EPA’s AQS database. The AMP 255 report is included in Appendix G of this plan to demonstrate QA completeness requirements as required in 40 CFR Part 58.10. The precision and bias data are reviewed for QA purposes by AMU and DM&QA staff to determine the quality of the ambient air data collected. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40 CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants. To date, the national air monitoring programs not currently accepting/requiring this precision and bias data include the NATTS and PAMS programs. 5.2.1 Particulate Monitors – PM 10 ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 10 . Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurement and both TEOMs and BAMs are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed once every four weeks and instrument calibrations are performed at minimum once per year or more frequently if needed by AMU staff. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these samplers once every six months. Section 3.3.1 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A indicates that 15 percent of the filter-based PM 10 sites in a network must be collocated. The collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. ADEQ has seven sites and according to the rule one collocated site is required. Currently ADEQ runs two collocated filter-based samplers, at Payson Well Site and Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, which exceeds this requirement. All concentrations from the collocated samplers are reported to the AQS with parameter occurrence code (POC) 2. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day for precision measurements. 5.2.2 Particulate Monitors – PM 2.5 ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 2.5 . Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurements and TEOMs, BAMs and nephelometers are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed by AMU. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these monitors once every six months. For the PM 2.5 network, each filter-based sampling method must include collocated sampling at 15 percent of the monitoring sites operated by the reporting agency. If the area has less than four State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 35 monitoring sites at least one must have a precision measurement. ADEQ currently operates six PM 2.5 sites which results in one collocated site being required. This requirement is met with the collocation of Partisols at the Nogales Post Office site. Previously, collocated PM 2.5 sampling also occurred at the JLG Supersite; however, with the replacement of the Partisol 2025 instruments with a Partisol 2000 instrument, collocation will no longer be required at this site. Section 3.2.5.6 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A requires that the collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day to ensure an adequate number of precision measurements. All concentrations from the collocated monitors are reported as POC 2. PEP audits are conducted on PM 2.5 filter-based samplers by the EPA. The PEP audit results are also used for measuring bias and are reported to AQS by the EPA. The ADEQ network has more than five filter-based sites, which requires eight PEP audits distributed evenly over four quarters. According to this schedule, all samplers will receive a PEP audit within a six year period. ADEQ operates two air samplers, the SuperSASS and the URG 3000, for the PM 2.5 STN as part of the CSN. Speciation filter samples are collected every third day. There is no collocation requirement for these samplers, but data generated from these samplers complement the data generated from the collocated IMPROVE samplers at JLG Supersite. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed. The QA Auditor audits each sampler quarterly. Beginning with 2010, all precision and bias measurements are reported to the AQS. 5.2.3 Gas Monitors – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2 One-point precision checks, along with zero and span checks are conducted biweekly and multipoint calibrations are performed quarterly by AMU for all gas monitors. Multi-point PE audits are performed annually by QA. Both measurements are reported to the AQS. NPAP audits are conducted by EPA annually for bias measurements. NPAP results are reported to AQS by the EPA. Beginning in July 2010, the frequency of these audits increased and are now conducted on a semi-annual basis. All shelters for the gas monitors contain temperature probes. The shelter temperature is checked daily via the data collection system (DCS) to verify proper operating conditions for the monitors. Shelter temperatures are required to be between 20º and 30º C. Shelter temperature probes are audited once every six months by QA. 5.2.4 Air Toxics Monitors ADEQ’s JLG Supersite in Phoenix is a designated air monitoring station for the NATTS program. AMU conducts verifications and calibrations on the samplers used to collect PM 10 metals, Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and hexavalent chrome. Calibrations occur once every six months and verifications occur on a monthly or quarterly basis. QA conducts PE audits on the same samplers once every six months. The VOC sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by either ATEC or ERG. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 36 5.2.5 Meteorological Equipment Meteorological equipment is audited by the QA Team annually. The meteorological equipment at the designated NCore site will be audited once every six months. 5.3 Calculations and Reporting ADEQ submits the required AQS precision and bias report (AMP 255) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per certification guidelines and CFR requirements. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM) measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records. Audit data for both PM monitors and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly. 5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities The QA Team conducts PE audits of AAS monitors, PCAQCD monitors, and some source monitors whose measurements are used for determining NAAQS compliance. 5.4.1 Internal Technical System Audits In 2010, the QA Team provided support and assistance to AMU in addressing the findings and recommendations from the Southern Regional Office (SRO) and Northern Regional Office (NRO) staff and operator TSAs. To date, the QA Auditor conducts TSAs on 12 IMPROVE samplers at 11 sites operating throughout the state annually. These TSAs are limited to evaluating site conditions and instrument performance with occasional operator interaction. Seven of the 12 samplers are “protocol” samplers meaning they are owned and operated by ADEQ. The other five samplers are owned and operated by EPA. Currently, AAS does not receive funds for the TSAs performed on EPA IMPROVE samplers. This schedule was reviewed in 2010 and there have been no changes to the audit services provided for IMPROVE program at this time. In late 2009, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of an Air Toxics Team whose members include technicians from AMU, the QA Auditor, and the data management lead. The purpose of this team was to prepare for a TSA and to update the NATTS / ATMP / PAMS QAPP and instrument SOPs. The team meets on a regular basis to address issues related to air toxics sampling. In mid-2010, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of a Pb Monitoring Team whose members include staff from Special Projects, AMU, the AFL, DM&QA as well as the manager of AAS. The purpose of the team was to ensure all pertinent staff were able to work together to develop program-related SOPs and the program QAPP. 5.4.2 ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports In early 2009, the QA Team reviewed the report of EPA's PEP audit program. DM&QA staff began investigating what changes may have occurred within the PM 2.5 network to cause a shift in program State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 37 performance over the last nine years. Based on EPA’s Three-Year Quality Assurance Reports for the SLAMS PM 2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program covering years 1999 through 2007, ADEQ's PM 2.5 network fell from a high rating to a low rating for bias results. Three areas are under review to identify and eliminate source(s) of error occurring in the network in order to reverse this trend. The program elements under review include: the sampler and impactor combination, the AFL gravimetric weighing process, operator training, and the PEP audit and data assessment process. To date, AFL has participated in three round-robins in the Gravimetric Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study conducted by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) and scored well on each. AMU is currently working on updating their training procedures for those responsible for operating filter-based PM 10 and PM 2.5 instrumentation. Further network evaluation will continue in 2011. 5.4.3 Technical Assistance Document Development In 2010, the process of verifying flow standards used by AMU and QA underwent some review. This review was initiated by the QA/QC Lead’s involvement as a reviewer on a new flow standard TAD by OAQPS. Currently, most AMU and QA flow standards are certified, or verified, annually. The calibrators used by QA for criteria pollutant gases and the O 3 standard are checked twice per year. All gas and flow rate standards used by AMU and QA Team are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) flow standard. 5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have responsibilities for auditing ADEQ's ambient air monitoring program. 5.5.2 PEP and NPAP Audits In 2011, ADEQ will continue to participate in the EPA NPAP and the PM 2.5 PEP audits. ADEQ consented to have EPA use a portion of ADEQ's grant funds to pay for these audit programs through IFC Consultants. NPAP and PEP audits are expected to occur in 2011 as in previous years. Also, PEP audits for Pb will begin in 2011 and the cost for this will be covered by EPA this year. 5.5.2 Technical System Audits In September 2009, EPA Region 9 conducted a comprehensive TSA on ADEQ’s air monitoring program. Findings and recommendations from the TSA were reviewed by AAS staff and an official Corrective Action Plan was submitted to EPA Region 9 in February, 2011. ADEQ will continue to work with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2009 EPA TSA. EPA Region 9 is required to conduct TSAs on the ADEQ monitoring program every three years. In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for EPA. Findings and recommendations from the TSA are being addressed. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 38 Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations AAAD AAS AADT ADEQ AFL AMU Auto GC/MS AQS BAM Bext Bscat CAA CBSA CFR CO CSN DCS DM&QA DQO E-BAM EDO EPA FEM FRM HAP IMPROVE MCAQD MET MQO MSA μg/m3 NAAQS NAREL NATA NATTS NCore NIST NM NO 2 NOx NOy NPAP NPS NRO Air Assessment Ambient Database Air Assessment Section Annual Average Daily Traffic Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Filter Lab Air Monitoring Unit Automated Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer Air Quality System (EPA database) Beta Attenuation Monitor Total Light Extinction Light Scattering Clean Air Act Combined Statistical Area Code of Federal Regulations Carbon Monoxide Chemical Speciation Network Data Collection System Data Management and Quality Assurance Unit Data Quality Objective Environmental Proof - Beta Attenuation Monitor Environmental Data Operation Environmental Protection Agency Federal Equivalent Method Federal Reference Method Hazardous Air Pollutants Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments Maricopa County Air Quality Department Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) Measurement Quality Objective Metropolitan Statistical Area Micrograms per Cubic Meter National Ambient Air Quality Standard National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory National Air Toxics Assessment National Air Toxics Trends Station National Core multipollutant monitoring stations National Institute of Standards and Technology National Monument Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrogen oxides measured in two ranges; 0-1 ppm and trace level 0-0.2 ppm Trace Level Nitrogen Oxides National Performance Audit Program National Park Service Northern Regional Office State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 39 NWS O3 OAQPS PAHs PAMS Pb PCAQCD PDEQ PE PEP PM PM 10 PM coarse PM 2.5 POC ppb ppm PQAO PSD PWEI QA QAPP QAPjP QAPrP QC QMP RASS SIP SLAMS SO 2 SOP SPM SRO STN TAD TEOM TSA USFS VOC National Weather Service Ozone Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Lead Pinal County Air Quality Control District Pima County Department of Environmental Quality Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Program Particulate Matter Particulate Matter < 10 microns Coarse Particulate Matter 2.5 to 10 microns aerodynamic diameter Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns Parameter Occurrence Code Parts Per Billion Parts Per Million Primary Quality Assurance Organization Prevention of Significant Deterioration Populated Weighted Emissions Index Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Program and/or Project Plan Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Assurance Project Plan Quality Control Quality Management Plan Radar Acoustic Sounding System State Implementation Plan State and Local Air Monitoring Stations Sulfur Dioxide Standard Operating Procedure Special Purpose Monitor Southern Regional Office Speciation Trends Network Technical Assistance Document Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technical System Audit United States Forest Service Volatile Organic Compound State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 40 Appendix B – Network Maps There are elevan maps in this section illustrating the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:  CO Network  NO 2 Network  O 3 Network  SO 2 Network  Pb Network  PM 10 Network  PM 2.5 Network  EBAM Network  Meteorological Network  Urban Visibility Network  IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 41 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 42 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 43 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 44 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 45 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 46 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 47 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 48 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 49 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 50 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 51 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 52 Appendix C – Current Monitors by Programs-Networks-Parameters ADEQ NETWORKS AirNOW...............................................................................................................................................54 EBAM ..................................................................................................................................................55 Meteorology Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................56 Wind...............................................................................................................................................57 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................59 NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS National Core Multi-pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore) ..............................................................60 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ..................................................................62 State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO ..................................................................................................................................................64 NO 2 ................................................................................................................................................65 O 3 ...................................................................................................................................................65 SO 2 .................................................................................................................................................67 Pb ...................................................................................................................................................68 PM 10 ...............................................................................................................................................69 PM 2.5 ..............................................................................................................................................71 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................72 SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK (STN) ...........................................................................................73 AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ........................................................................................74 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)..............................................................................75 VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera ...........................................................................................................................................76 Nephelometer.................................................................................................................................77 Transmissometer ............................................................................................................................78 Temp/RH........................................................................................................................................79 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................80 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 53 ADEQ - AirNOW Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Bscat/PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Bscat/PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Bscat/PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Dysart Tower Population Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -6/16/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m 30 m -360° Annual Estrella Tower Population Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -2/11/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m 25 m 5m 360° Annual Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Tower Visibility Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -6/25/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 5m 30 m 50 m 360° Annual State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 54 ADEQ - E-BAM - PM10 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Flow rate verification frequency Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Rooftop Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -7/3/2007 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m 10 m 15 m 300° Monthly Prescott Prescott College AQD Rooftop Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -12/5/2006 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m -7m 250° Monthly Flagstaff Sedona Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -12/5/2006 Continuous Hourly All year N 2m 13 m 15 m 360° Monthly Navajo None Show Low Rooftop Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -5/25/2011 Continuous Hourly All year N ----Monthly Springerville Rooftop Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -9/24/2008 Continuous Hourly All year N 8m -30 m 250° Monthly State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 55 Prescott Verde Ranger Station Metal Platform Population Neighborhood E-BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One E-BAM -1/1/2008 Continuous Hourly All year N 3.5 m -30 m 360° Monthly ADEQ - Meteorology - Temp/RH CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPayson Scottsdale Payson Payson Scottsdale Pima Yuma Hayden Old Miami Golf Payson Well Yuma Globe Highway Jail JLG Supersite Course Site Queen Valley Rillito Supersite Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower Population Population Population Population Population Population Source Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Probe Probe Probe Probe Probe Probe Probe Probe None None None None None None None None Rotronics Rotronics Rotronics Rotronics Rotronics Vaisala Vaisala Vaisala MP101A MP101A MP101A MP101A MP101A HMP 45C HMP 45C HMP 45C --------4/14/2011 2/2/2011 1/15/2010 4/27/2011 6/8/2011 6/19/2003 3/30/2010 3/17/2010 Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly All year All year All year All year All year All year All year All year N N N N N N N N 2m 2m 2m 2m 3m 2m 2m 2m 1m 1m 1m 1m 1m 1m 1m 1m -1m 8m 12 m -7m 1m 1m 4m 2m 5m ---5m 18 m 250° 210° 300° -250° 360° 360° 220° Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Payson State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 56 ADEQ - Meteorology - Wind CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Tucson Payson Payson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Ajo Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 6/11/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m -35 m 360° Annual Globe Highway Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 4/14/2011 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m -4m 360° Annual Hayden Old Jail Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 2/2/2011 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 2m 2m 360° Annual JLG Supersite Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 2/12/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 8m 5m 360° Biannual Miami Golf Course Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 6/8/2011 Continuous Hourly All year N ----Annual State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 57 Nogales Nogales Post Office Pole Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 6/13/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m -20 m 360° Annual ADEQ - Meteorology - Wind - continued CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South Tower Source Middle Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 12/16/1997 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m --360° Annual Payson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Tucson Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Yuma Payson Well Site Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 5/30/1991 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 7m 5m 360° Annual Queen Valley Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 4/27/2011 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m --360° Annual Rillito Tower Source Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 1/8/2004 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 20 m 20 m 360° Annual Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 5/11/1999 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 30 m 50 m 360° Annual Yuma Supersite Tower Population Neighborhood Anemometer None RM Young 5103 40 3/17/2010 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m 50 m -360° Annual State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 58 ADEQ - SPM Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type PM10 None Agua Prieta Fire Station Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 PM2.5 None Agua Prieta Fire Station Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Temp/RH None Agua Prieta Fire Station Rooftop Population Neighborhood Probe Wind None Agua Prieta Fire Station Rooftop Population Neighborhood Anemometer PM10 None Sonora Nogales Fire Station Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 PM2.5 None Sonora Nogales Fire Station Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Gravimetric Thermo 2000 F 126 4/11/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m -30 m 20 m 360° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months Gravimetric Thermo 2000 F 126 4/11/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m -30 m 20 m 360° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months None Vaisala HMP 45C -12/18/1998 Continuous Hourly All year N 8m -30 m 20 m 360° --- None RM Young 5103 -12/18/1998 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m -30 m 20 m 360° --- Gravimetric Thermo 2000 F 126 4/11/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m 3m 3m -250° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months Gravimetric Thermo 2000 F 126 4/11/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m 3m 3m -250° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 59 PM2.5 Nogales Nogales Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One 1020 731 2/2/2004 Continuous Hourly All year Y 7m -8m 12 m 300° Biannual Monthly PM10 None San Luis Rio Colorado Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol Dichot PM2.5 None San Luis Rio Colorado Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol Dichot Gravimetric Thermo 2000 D -6/15/2009 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m 20m 50 m 5m 360° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months Gravimetric Thermo 2000 D -6/15/2009 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4m 20m 50 m 5m 360° Every 3 Months Every 3 Months NCore Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency One-point QC check frequency PEP audit monitor? NPAP audit monitor? CO Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood CO Trace Analyzer Gas Filter Correlation Ecotech EC 9830 588 6/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m 2m Teflon 0.76 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual -Every 2 weeks --- NOy Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood Trace Reactive NOx Chemiluminescence Ecotech EC 9843 591 4/1/2011 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m 7m Teflon 13.08 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual -Every 2 weeks --- O3 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood O3 Analyzer UV Photometric API Teledyne M400E 087 3/15/2011 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m 2m Teflon 0.83 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual -Every 2 weeks -Y SO2 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood SO2 Trace Analyzer Pulsed Fluorescence Ecotech EC 9850 592 6/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m 2m Teflon 0.51 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual -Every 2 weeks --- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 60 PM10-2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Metal Roof Population Neighborhood BAM Partisol 2000 Difference Method Met One 1020 185 11/10/2010 Continuous Hourly All year N ----8m 5m 210° Biannual Monthly ---- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 145 7/1/2011 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 5m ---8m 5m 210° Biannual Monthly -Y -- NCore continued PM2.5 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Metal Roof Population Neighborhood Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One 1020 Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency One-point QC check frequency PEP audit monitor? NPAP audit monitor? 170 11/10/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m ---8m 5m 210° Biannual Monthly ---- Monitor type PM2.5 Speciation PM2.5 Speciation Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Metal Roof Metal Roof Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Speciation Speciation FRM/SASS FRM/URG Various Met One Super SASS 811/812/813 2/21/2000 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 5m ---8m 5m 210° Quarterly Every 2 weeks ---- Various URG 3000N 838/839/840/841/8 42/826 10/1/2009 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 5m ---8m 5m 210° Quarterly Every 2 weeks ---- Temp/RH Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Tower Population Neighborhood Wind Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Tower Population Neighborhood Probe Anemometer None Rotronics MP101A None RM Young 5103 21 1/15/2010 Continuous Hourly All year N 2m ---8m 5m 210° Biannual ----- 40 2/12/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 10 m ---8m 5m 360° Biannual ----- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 61 PAMS Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? CO NOx O3 Carbonyl Carbonyl VOC O3 Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen Valley Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Population Population Population Population Population Population Transport Neighborhood Neighborhood Urban Urbany Urbany Urban Urban Cartridge Cartridge Canister CO Trace Sampler Sampler Sampler O3 Analyzer Analyzer NOx Analyzer O3 Analyzer Gas Filter ChemiluminCorrelation escence UV Photometric TO-11A TO-11A Lab Analysis UV Photometric Thermo Thermo Thermo ATEC ATEC Met One Thermo 48C 42C 49C 8000 8000 8001 49C 54 74 47 202 202 -47 12/11/2002 7/1/1993 7/1/1993 5/15/1999 5/15/1999 6/1/2009 1/1/1998 Continuous Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Hourly Hourly Hourly 24 hour 3 - 3 hour Hourly 24 hour All Year All Year All Year All year All year June - Aug. April – Oct. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 4.5 m 5m -------Teflon Teflon Teflon ---Teflon 0.76 sec 0.89 sec 0.83 sec ---3.56 sec 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 8m 30 m 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 5m 3m 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 360° Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual -Annual Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Every 2 weeks Y Y Y ---Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 62 PAMS continued Total Horizontal Ultraviolet Solar NOy VOC Delta Temp Solar Radiation Radiation Wind Profiler Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Queen Valley Queen Valley Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Shelter Shelter Tower Tower Tower Ground Transport Transport Population Population Population Population Urban Urban Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? Trace Reactive Canister NOx - Seasonal Sampler Chemiluminescence Lab Analysis Thermo Met One 42C TL 8001 574 -5/9/2011 6/1/2010 Continuous 1 in 6 Hourly 24 hour April – Oct. June – Aug. Y Y 5m 5m ------30 m 30 m 3m 3m 360° 360° Annual Every 3 Years Every 2 weeks ---- Delta Temp System Pyranometer Ultraviolet Sensor Wind Profiler None RM Young RTD 7627 810 8/20/2004 Continuous Hourly All year N 2m&9m 1m --30 m 50 m 360° Annual --- None Li-Cor LI - 200S2 11 6/18/1999 Continuous Hourly All year N 5m 0.5 m --30 m 50 m 360° ---- None Epply TUVR 11 8/20/2004 Continuous Hourly All year N 5m 0.5 m --35 m 50 m 360° ---- None Vaisala LAP-3000 -1/1/1998 Continuous Hourly All year N ----5m 50 m 360° ---- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 63 NAAQS - SLAMS - CO CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood CO Trace Analyzer Gas Filter Correlation Ecotech EC 9830 588 6/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All Year Y 5m Teflon 0.76 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual Every 2 weeks Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 64 NAAQS - SLAMS - NO2 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood NOx Analyzer Chemiluminescence Thermo 42C 74 7/1/1993 Continuous Hourly All Year Y 5m Teflon 0.89 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual Every 2 weeks Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 65 NAAQS - SLAMS - O3 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? None Alamo Lake Shelter Transport Regional O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 5m 2m Teflon 2.91 sec 7m 12 m 360° Annual Every 2 weeks -- Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Shelter Population Neighborhood O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 10 m 0.5 m Teflon 8.66 sec -15 m 360° Annual Every 2 weeks -- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Urban O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/15/2011 Continuous Hourly All Year Y 5m -Teflon 0.83 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual Every 2 weeks Y Prescott Prescott College AQD Shelter Population Neighborhood O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 6m -Teflon 3.60 sec -12 m 250° Annual Every 2 weeks -- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Queen Valley Shelter Transport Urban O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 5m -Teflon 3.56 sec 30 m 3m 360° Annual Every 2 weeks Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 66 Payson Tonto National Monument Shelter Transport Regional O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 6m 2m Teflon 3.53 sec -4m 360° Annual Every 2 weeks Y Yuma Yuma Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood O3 Analyzer UV Photometric Teledyne API 400E 087 3/1/2011 Continuous Hourly April – Oct. Y 5m 2m Teflon 2.98 sec 35 m -360° Annual Every 2 weeks -- NAAQS - SLAMS - SO2 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Payson Hayden Old Jail Shelter Source Neighborhood Monitor type SO2 Analyzer Pulsed Fluorescence Thermo 43C 60 1/1/1975 Continuous Hourly All year Y 7m 2m Teflon 4.75 sec 3m 15 m 360° Annual Every 2 weeks Y Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Probe material Residence time Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency NPAP audit monitor? Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood SO2 Trace Analyzer Pulsed Fluorescence Ecotech EC 9850 592 6/11/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m -Teflon 0.51 sec 8m 5m 210° Annual Every 2 weeks Y Payson Miami Ridgeline Shelter Source Neighborhood SO2 Analyzer Pulsed Fluorescence Thermo 43C 60 10/5/1995 Continuous Hourly All year Y 4m 2m Teflon 4.88 sec 5m 5m 180° Annual Every 2 weeks Y State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 67 NAAQS - SLAMS - Pb CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Monitor analysis method Lab analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Payson Payson Globe Highway Platform Source Middle TSP High-Vol Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry Tisch TE-5170-BL 191 10/1/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m --4m 360 2m Quarterly Every 12 days Globe Highway Platform Source Middle TSP High-Vol Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry Tisch TE-5170-BL 191 10/1/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m --4m 360° 2m Quarterly Every 12 days Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Metal Roof Population Neighborhood --- -----1 in 6 24 hour All year N ------Quarterly Every 12 days State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 68 Payson Miami Golf Course Platform Source Middle TSP High-Vol Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry Tisch TE-5170-BL 191 10/1/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3.5 m --1m 180° -Quarterly Every 12 days NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Lake Havasu CityKingman Tucson Ajo Metal Platform Population Neighborhood TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology R&P 1400AB 79 2/19/2009 Continuous Hourly All Year Y 4m -7m 35 m 360° -Biannual Monthly Bullhead City Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Sierra VistaDouglas Douglas Red Cross Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 9/2/2003 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 8m -7m -360° -Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 4/1/2004 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4m -10 m >10 m 300° -Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 4/1/2004 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 6m -10 m 15 m 300° -Biannual Monthly Payson Hayden Old Jail Rooftop Source Neighborhood TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology R&P 1400AB 79 3/3/2009 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m -3m 15 m 360° -Biannual Monthly State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 69 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood BAM Nogales Nogales Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Beta Ray Attenuation Met One 1020 185 6/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y --8m 5m 210° -Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 8/27/2003 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m -8m 6m 300° -Biannual Monthly NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continued CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Metal Platform Source Middle Partisol 2000 Sierra VistaDouglas Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Metal Platform Source Middle Partisol 2000 Payson Payson Prescott Tucson Yuma Payson Well Site Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Payson Well Site Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Prescott Valley Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 7/20/2005 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4m -50 m 5m 320° 1.5 m Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 6/28/2005 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4m -50 m 5m 320° 1.5 m Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 1/16/2005 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m -12 m 5m 300° 2m Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 5/13/2009 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 3m -12 m 5m 300° 2m Biannual Monthly Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126 12/28/2007 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m -20 m -360° -Biannual Monthly Rillito Metal Platform Source Neighborhood TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology R&P 1400 AB 79 4/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All year N 5m -4m 20 m 360° -Biannual Monthly Yuma Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Technology R&P 1400 AB 79 12/1/2009 Continuous Hourly All year Y 5m 2m 50 m -360° -Biannual Monthly State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 70 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5 CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency PEP audit monitor? Changes in next 18 months? Sierra VistaDouglas Douglas Red Cross Metal Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Flagstaff Flagstaff Middle School Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 4/1/2004 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4m 8m >10 m 300° -Biannual Monthly Y -- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 9/16/2003 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 6m 10 m 15 m 300° -Biannual Monthly Y -- Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Metal Roof Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 JLG Supersite Shelter Population Neighborhood BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One 1020 185 6/1/2010 Continuous Hourly All year Y -8m 5m 210° -Biannual Monthly --- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 7/1/2011 1 in 3 24 hour All Year N 5m 8m 5m 210° -Biannual Monthly Y -- Nogales Nogales Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Nogales Nogales Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Prescott Yuma Prescott Valley Rooftop Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Yuma Supersite Platform Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 9/26/2003 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m 8m 10 m 300° 2m Biannual Monthly Y -- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 9/26/2003 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 7m 8m 10 m 300° 2m Biannual Monthly Y -- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 1/1/2008 1 in 6 24 hour All Year N 7m 20 m -360° -Biannual Monthly --- Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 143 1/1/2010 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 5m 50 m -360° -Biannual Monthly --- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 71 NAAQS - SPM Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency PM10 Nogales Nogales Post Office Rooftop Population Neighborhood BAM Beta Ray Attenuation Met One 1020 122 2/2/2004 Continuous Hourly All year Y 7m 8m 12 m 300° Biannual Monthly State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 72 STN Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency PM2.5 Speciated PM2.5 Speciation Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Metal Roof Metal Roof Population Population Neighborhood Neighborhood Speciation FRM/ Speciation SASS FRM/URG Various Various Met One URG Super SASS 3000N 838/839/840/841/8 811/812/813 42/826 2/21/2000 10/1/2009 1 in 6 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour All year All year N N 5m 5m 8m 8m 5m 5m 210° 210° Biannual Quarterly Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 73 TOXICS - NATTS Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency One-point QC check frequency VOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Urban VOC Canister Sampler TO15/TO14 Tisch Environmental 2200 101/126 6/6/2001 1 in 6 24 hour All year Y 5m -8m 5m 210° Annual -Annual VOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Urban VOC Canister Sampler TO15/TO14 Tisch Environmental 2200 101/126 6/6/2001 1 in 6 24 hour All year Y 5m -8m 5m 210° Annual -Annual Hexavalent Carbonyl Carbonyl Chromium Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Scottsdale JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Shelter Shelter Metal Roof Population Population Population Urban Urban Urban Carbonyl Cartridge Carbonyl Cartridge Sampler Sampler Toxic Air Sampler TO-11A TO-11A CARB Method ATEC 8000 202 5/15/1999 1 in 6 24 hour All year Y 5m -8m 5m 210° Annual -Annual ATEC 8000 202 5/15/1999 1 in 6 24 hour All year Y 5m -8m 5m 210° Annual -Annual Xontech 924 921 1/1/2006 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 5m -8m 5m 210° Biannual --- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 74 SVOC Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Shelter Population Urban PUF Lab Analysis Tisch Environmental TE-1000BL 118 7/8/2007 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 4.5 m -8m 5m 210° Biannual -Monthly PM10 Metal Speciation Phoenix-MesaScottsdale JLG Supersite Metal Roof Population Neighborhood Partisol 2000 Gravimetric R&P 2000 F 126/202 1/1/2005 1 in 6 24 hour All year N 5m -8m 5m 210° Biannual Monthly -- TOXICS - UATMP Parameter CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency One-point QC check frequency Toxics Phoenix-MesaScottsdale South Phoenix Shelter Population Neighborhood Multiport Canister Sampler TO15 ATEC 8001 -8/5/2001 1 in 12 24 hour May-Aug. Y 6m 2m 12 m 10 m 250° Annual -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 75 Visibility - Urban Haze - Camera CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale ADEQ Building Rooftop Visibility Urban High Res Digital Camera None Olympus SP500UZ -6/9/2003 Every 15 min. 1 min. All year N Banner Mesa Medical Center Rooftop Visibility Urban High Res Digital Camera None Olympus SP500UZ -6/10/2003 Every 15 min. 1 min. All year N Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Estrella Mountain Estrella Mountain Community Community College College Rooftop Rooftop Visibility Visibility Urban Urban High Res Digital High Res Digital Camera Camera None None Olympus Olympus SP500UZ SP500UZ --3/12/2003 3/12/2003 Every 15 min. Every 15 min. 1 min. 1 min. All year All year N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 76 Phoenix-MesaScottsdale North Mountain Tower Visibility Urban High Res Digital Camera None Olympus SP500UZ -7/1/2003 Every 15 min. 1 min. All year N Visibility - Urban Haze - Nephelometer CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Dysart Tower Population Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -6/16/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m --360° Annual Estrella Tower Population Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -2/11/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m -5m 360° Annual Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Tower Population Neighborhood Nephelometer Light Scatter with correlation to PM2.5 Optec NGN 2 -6/30/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 5m 30 m 50 m 360° Annual State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 77 Visibility - Urban Haze - Transmissometer CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Phoenix Phoenix Transmissometer Transmissometer Receiver Transmitter Rooftop Rooftop Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Urban Transmissometer Transmissometer Receiver Transmitter Light Attenuation Light Attenuation Optec Optec LVP-2 LVP-2 --12/1/1992 12/1/1992 Continuous Continuous All year All year N N State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 78 Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RH CBSA Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Monitor audit frequency Dysart Tower Population Neighborhood Probe None Rotronics MP101A -7/16/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m 1m --360° Annual Estrella Tower Population Neighborhood Probe None Rotronics MP101A -2/11/2003 Continuous Hourly All year N 6m 1m -5m 360° Annual Phoenix-MesaPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Scottsdale Phoenix Transmissometer Vehicle Emissions Receiver Laboratory Rooftop Tower Urban Haze Population Urban Neighborhood Probe Probe None None Rotronics Rotronics MP101A MP101A --6/9/2003 6/30/2003 Continuous Continuous Hourly Hourly All year All year N N 36 m 5m 1m 1m 5m 30 m -50 m 360° 360° Annual Annual State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 79 IMPROVE CBSA Sierra VistaDouglas Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Chiricahua Entrance Station Shelter Visibility Regional Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Protocol site IMPROVE Various Various Various -4/2/2000 1 in 3 24 hour All Year N 4m 1m 10 m 10 m 360° ----- Sierra VistaDouglas Flagstaff Flagstaff Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Douglas Red National Park Indian Cross Hance Camp Gardens Platform Shelter Shelter Visibility Visibility Visibility Regional Regional Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -6/2/2004 1 in 3 24 hour All Year N 3m 2m 10 m 10 m 300° -Annual -Y IMPROVE Various Various Various -8/1/1997 1 in 3 24 hour All year N * * * * * ----- IMPROVE Various Various Various -10/1/1989 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 4m 2m -6m 300° ----- Apache Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter Visibility Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -2/29/2000 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 4m 1m 150 m 50 m 360° -Annual --- Flagstaff Phoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-Mesa- Lake Havasu Scottsdale Scottsdale City-Kingman Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Shelter Metal Roof Metal Roof Visibility Population Population Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood IMPROVE collocated IMPROVE IMPROVE Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various ---4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour All year All year All year N N N 4m 5.5 m 5.5 m 1m --7m 8m 8m 18 m 5m 5m 360° 210° 210° -2m 2m Annual Annual Annual -Annual Annual -Y Y * Information not available State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 80 Meadview Shelter Background Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -2/1/2003 1 in 3 24 hour All year N * * * * * ----- IMPROVE - continued CBSA Site monitor located Monitor location at site Monitoring objective Spatial scale Monitor type Analysis method Make of monitor Model of monitor Method code Monitor start date Sampling schedule Sampling duration Sampling season In climate controlled shelter Probe height from ground Probe distance from structure Distance from closest obstruction Distance from trees Unrestricted airflow degrees Dist. between collocated monitors Monitor audit frequency Flow rate verification frequency Protocol site Tucson Organ Pipe National Monument Shelter Background Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -1/14/2003 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 5m 1.5 m 7m 15 m 360° -Annual -Y Phoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson Tucson Pleasant Saguaro Petrified Forest Valley Ranger National Park National Park Station Queen Valley East Shelter Shelter Rooftop Shelter Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Regional Regional Urban Regional IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various ----1/1/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour All year All year All year All year N N N N * 4m 6m * * 1.5 m 1m * * -30 m * * 10 m 4m * * 360° 360° * -----Annual Annual -------Y -None * Information not available State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 81 Tucson Saguaro National Park West Shelter Visibility Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -4/18/2001 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 4m 1m -15 m 360° -Annual -Y Flagstaff Payson Sycamore Canyon Shelter Visibility Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -9/1/1997 1 in 3 24 hour All year N 4m 1m 25 m 15 m 360° -Annual --- Tonto National Monument Shelter Visibility Regional IMPROVE Various Various Various -1/1/2002 1 in 3 24 hour All year Y 5m 1.5 m -6m 360° -Annual --- Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations Each monitoring site where ADEQ operates ambient air instruments is described in this section. The parameters that are currently measured at the sites are listed with the start date for the parameter and not the monitor. See Appendix C for detailed information on specific monitors grouped by monitoring networks. AQS ID 80-026-1000 04-019-0001 04-012-8000 04-015-1003 04-003-8001 04-003-1005 04-013-4010 04-013-8005 04-005-1008 04-005-8102 04-005-8101 04-001-8001 04-007-1001 04-025-8104 04-013-9997 04-015-9000 04-007-8000 04-007-0009 04-023-0004 04-019-0005 04-003-0011 04-007-0008 04-001-0012 04-025-8033 04-025-2002 04-021-8001 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 21737 16361 16316 34961 19489 16365 16679 16503 19550 16506 21736 16707 16593 16682 16683 16323 16326 16421 16328 21298 16629 16382 16511 16480 16681 16391 16392 16317 16473 16829 16330 16446 133011 18392 16394 16499 SITE NAME ADEQ Building Agua Prieta Fire Station Ajo Alamo Lake Banner Mesa Medical Center Bullhead City Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Dysart Estrella Estrella Mountain Community College Flagstaff Middle School Globe Highway Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Garden Greer Water Treatment Plant Hayden Old Jail Ike’s Backbone JLG Supersite Meadview Miami Golf Course Miami Ridgeline Nogales Post Office North Mountain Summit Organ Pipe National Monument Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South Payson Well Site Petrified Forest National Park Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Prescott College AQD Prescott Valley Queen Valley Rillito State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 82 PAGE 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 AQS ID 04-019-0021 04-019-9000 80-026-8012 04-005-1010 04-017-0007 80-026-0005 04-013-4003 04-005-8103 04-007-0010 04-013-9998 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 16474 16475 113221 16512 16603 16399 16377 135133 16476 16447 16363 138696 11319 SITE NAME Saguaro National Park East Saguaro National Park West San Luis Rio Colorado Sedona Post Office Show Low Sonora Nogales Fire Station South Phoenix Springerville Sycamore Canyon Tonto National Monument Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Verde Ranger Station Yuma Supersite State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 83 PAGE 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ADEQ Building Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of the building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 kilometers to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/came1/index.html. The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residential with some commercial areas. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential/Commercial Longitude 84 m – S Elevation 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 21737 Rooftop 33.4483 -112.0878 329 m 06/09/2003 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 06/09/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 84 Agua Prieta Fire Station Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located approximately 640 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is primarily residential. This site is used as a comparison to the Douglas Red Cross site as part of the border studies. Site Information AQS ID 80-026-1000 ADEQ ID Address Calle 6 & Ave. 15 Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 6m–W Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1995 04/11/2010 16361 Rooftop 31.3283 -109.5472 1,200 m 01/01/1995 Wind ADEQ-SPM Neighborhood 12/18/1998 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 12/18/1998 Site Photos Roof of Aqua Prieta Fire Station – 12/2004 Aerial view of Agua Prieta Fire Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 85 Ajo Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located at the Pima County Maintenance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest structure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lies the stabilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo mining operation which closed in 1985. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 109 m – E Elevation Traffic count 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16316 Gravel 32.3820 -112.8575 515 m 07/01/1969 Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind SLAMS ADEQ-MET Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1987 07/01/1969 Site Photos Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 03/2009 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 86 Alamo Lake Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting. The site was established to replace the Hillside site and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49,000 meters north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1,000 meters to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the instruments. Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID Address Alamo Lake State Park County La Paz Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 30 m – E Elevation Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 34961 Gravel 34.2439 -113.5586 403 m 05/20/2005 Monitoring Information O3 SLAMS Regional 05/20/2005 Site Photos Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the east – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 87 Banner Mesa Medical Center Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32,000 meters east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/supm1/index.html. The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential, with some commercial areas. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 20 m – N Elevation 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date 19489 Rooftop 33.4335 -111.8428 454 m 06/10/2003 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 06/10/2003 Site Photos No Photo Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 88 Bullhead City Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport. Site Information AQS ID 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429 County Mohave Groundcover CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road ~30 m – W Elevation Traffic count 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16365 Rooftop 35.1539 -114.5661 156 m 11/01/1997 Monitoring Information PM 10 SLAMS Neighborhood 11/05/1997 Site Photos Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office looking south – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 89 Chiricahua Entrance Station Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3,800 meters to the northeast. Site Information AQS ID 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID Address 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 99 m – E Elevation Traffic count 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16679 Dirt/Rocks 32.0094 -109.3891 1,570 m 01/01/1988 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 90 Douglas Red Cross Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located at the Red Cross building on the south side of 15th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Also, there is a second AQS ID 04-003-9000 for IMPROVE data. Site Information AQS ID 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID th Address 1445 E. 15 St. Douglas, AZ 85607 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 30 m – N Elevation th Traffic count 2,320 – 14 St. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 SLAMS SLAMS Neighborhood Neighborhood 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 16503 Dirt/Grass 31.3492 -109.5396 1,231 m 09/01/1998 Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 06/02/2004 Site Photos Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 07/20/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 91 Dysart Site Purpose: monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting/AIRNow program. The site is located in the Maricopa County Facility Maintenance Yard at the corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 14 m – W Elevation Traffic count 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 19550 Gravel 33.6370 -112.3393 357 m 01/01/2003 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Urban Haze/ Urban Haze AIRNow Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/2003 03/25/2003 Site Photos Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 02/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 92 Estrella Site Purpose: monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting/AIRNow program. The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estrella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Recreation Area Longitude Distance to road 258 m – N Elevation Traffic count 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16506 Grass/Gravel 33.3833 -112.3728 277 m 01/01/1995 Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Urban Haze/ Urban Haze AIRNow Neighborhood Neighborhood 12/18/2002 12/18/2002 Site Photos Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 02/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 93 Estrella Mountain Community College Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. One high-resolution digital camera points to the Estrella Mountains, which lies 11,000 meters to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20,000 meters northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/esmo1/index.html. The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323 Maricopa Groundcover Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Residential Longitude 155 m – S Elevation 7,280 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 21736 Rooftop 33.4836 -112.3503 305 m 03/12/2003 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 03/12/2003 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 94 Flagstaff Middle School Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information. The site is west of Bonito Road on the rooftop of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 70 m – E Elevation Traffic count 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information O3 PM 10 SLAMS SLAMS/ADEQE-BAM Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/13/2008 10/30/1996 16707 Rooftop 35.2061 -111.6528 2,120 m 10/29/1996 PM 2.5 SLAMS Neighborhood 09/09/1999 Site Photos Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff Middle School – 04/2008 Aerial view of Flagstaff Middle School State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 95 Globe Highway Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. This site is the location for the Pb monitoring in Hayden. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site. This site is used to meet the Pb collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 5m–W Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Pb Wind Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Middle Middle Parameter start date at site 10/01/2010 04/14/2011 16593 Gravel 33.002 -110.765 602 m 01/01/1975 Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Middle 04/14/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 5/10/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 96 Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive, 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID Address West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 200 m – E Elevation Traffic count 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16682 Dirt 35.9731 -111.9841 2,235 m 09/24/1997 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 09/24/1997 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 97 Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Gardens Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is owned by the NPS. The site is located in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the south side of the canyon along the Bright Angel Trail. AQS ID 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID Address Bright Angel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 8,047 m – S Elevation Traffic count 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16683 Dirt/Rocks 36.0778 -112.1289 1,183 m 10/01/1989 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 10/04/1989 Site Photos Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 98 Greer Water Treatment Plant Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located in the Apache National Forest and is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4,000 meters to the south/southwest. Site Information AQS ID 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927 County Apache Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Forest Longitude Distance to road 1,600 m – N Elevation Traffic count 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16323 Grass 34.0583 -109.4400 2,503 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 02/29/2000 Site Photos Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 99 Hayden Old Jail Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. The site is located in a shelter next to the old Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved due to safety concerns in 2010. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site in the old jail building. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 5m–E Elevation Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter SO 2 PM 10 Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1975 01/06/1986 Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16326 Shelter 33.0062 -110.7864 625 m 01/01/1969 Wind ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Monitoring Information Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 02/02/2011 Site Photos Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail – 05/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 100 Ike’s Backbone Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas with the Verde River and mountains nearby. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Address Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544 County Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.6825 Distance to road n/a Elevation 1,303 m Traffic count 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000 Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 04/02/2000 Site Photos Regional view of Ike’s Backbone Shelters and tower at Ike’s Backbone – 12/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 101 JLG Supersite Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, PAMS, NATTS, STN, NCore, AIRNow, AQI forecasting, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support. The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily residential neighborhoods, with I-17 roughly 1,609 meters west. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID th Address 4530 N. 17 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 8.5 m – E Elevation Traffic count 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information CO CO Trace SLAMS NCore Neighborhood Neighborhood 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter NO 2 O3 SLAMS/PAMS/ Network or Program SLAMS/PAMS NCore Neighborhood Neighborhood/ Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information SO 2 Trace NCore Neighborhood 01/01/2011 VOC TOXICS NATTS/ PAMS Urban 05/15/1999 Monitoring Information Hexavalent SVOC Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Chromium TOXIC TOXICS Network or Program NATTS NATTS Spatial Scale Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 16328 Gravel 33.5038 -112.0957 354 m 07/01/1993 NOy NCore Neighborhood 01/01/2011 SO 2 SLAMS Neighborhood 03/03/2005 Carbonyls TOXICS NATTS/ PAMS Urban 05/15/1999 Pb PM 10 NCore Neighborhood -- State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 102 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10-2.5 PM 10 Network or Program NCore SLAMS Neighborhood -- Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Speciated Network or Program SLAMS/NCore STN Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Neighborhood 01/01/1999 Neighborhood 01/01/1999 PM 10 /Metal Speciation TOXICS – NATTS Neighborhood 01/01/2005 Wind ADEQMet/NCore Neighborhood 07/01/1993 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Temp/RH Aerosol Network or Program NCore IMPROVE Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/15/2010 04/25/2001 Site Photos Eastern side of JLG Supersite – 09/2008 Aerial view of JLG Supersite State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 103 Meadview Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located on the north end of Meadview, AZ, which is a small town near the Nevada/Arizona border, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southwest 64,400 meters is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96,560 meters to the southeast is downtown Kingman. Site Information AQS ID 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444 County Mohave Groundcover CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude Distance to road 100 m – E Elevation Traffic count 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 21298 Gravel 36.0193 -114.0684 902 m 09/04/1991 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 09/04/1991 Site Photos Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 104 Miami Golf Course Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. This site is the location for the Pb monitoring in Miami. Freeport McMoRan also maintains two particulate matter monitors at the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 230 – E Elevation Traffic count n/a Site Established Date Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Pb Wind Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Middle Middle Parameter start date at site 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 16629 Gravel 33.4190 -110.8296 1000 m 01/01/1997 Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Middle 06/08/2011 Site Photos Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 05/2011 Aerial view of Miami Golf Course State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 105 Miami Ridgeline Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. The site is located inside the fence line on private property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ridge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintains a PM 10 monitor at the site. The Freeport McMoRan smelter is 1,609 meters to the north of the site. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539 Gila Groundcover Payson Latitude Residential Longitude 40 m – N Elevation 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date 16382 Dirt 33.3992 -110.8589 1,085 m 0/01/1991 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter SO 2 Network or Program SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 10/05/1995 Site Photos Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 106 Nogales Post Office Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Border. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. This site is used to meet the PM 2.5 collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621 County Santa Cruz Groundcover CBSA Nogales Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 14 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 SLAMS/NAAQS- SLAMS/ADEQSPM SPM Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 16511 Rooftop 31.3372 -110.9367 1,176 m 01/01/1980 Wind ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 01/01/1980 Site Photos Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 09/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 107 North Mountain Summit Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The site is located on a mountain top in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera points toward South Mountain, which lies 27,000 meters south. The pictures of the local views are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/somt1/index.html. The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with some commercial activity to the south and east. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information None ADEQ ID 16480 west side of 7th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722 850 m – E Elevation 625 m 28,210 – 7th St. Site Established Date 07/01/2003 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 07/01/2003 Site Photos Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 2008 Aerial view of North Mountain Summit State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 108 Organ Pipe National Monument Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1,000 meters south/southwest of the national monument visitor center, which is about 35,400 meter south of Why, AZ. The site is about 7 meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mountain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID Address SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 400 m – E Elevation Traffic count 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16681 Gravel 31.9499 -112.8010 505 m 01/01/1971 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 01/15/2003 Site Photos Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 03/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 109 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located about 3,500 meters north of the Arizona/Mexico border and is just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas. The surrounding area is predominately desert. The chemical lime plant is to the west/southwest. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID Address SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 50 m – S Elevation Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16391 Dirt 31.3658 -109.7309 1,278 m 02/21/1985 Monitoring Information PM 10 SLAMS Neighborhood 03/01/1985 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors on platform at Paul Spur CLP – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 110 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South Site Purpose: meteorological support. The site is located about 3,500 meters north of the Arizona/Mexico border and is just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas. The surrounding area is predominately desert. The chemical lime plant is to the north/northwest. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address South of Stonridge Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 County Cochise Groundcover CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16392 Dirt/Grass 31.3543 -109.7376 1,287 m 12/21/1995 Monitoring Information Wind ADEQ-MET Middle 12/21/1995 Site Photos Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP South Meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP South – 07/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 111 Payson Well Site Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located in the southern area of Payson, at a water well site. To the southeast of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use. Directly to the west, on the other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290 meters to the east is SR 87. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 80 m – S Elevation Traffic count 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind SLAMS ADEQ-MET Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1991 05/30/1991 16317 Gravel 34.2294 -111.3297 1,501 m 01/01/1991 Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 05/30/1991 Site Photos Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and particulate monitor on platform – 04/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 112 Petrified Forest National Park Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1,609 meters north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surrounding area is desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Address I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ County Apache Groundcover Dirt CBSA None Latitude 35.0770 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690 Distance to road 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m Traffic count 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988 Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 03/02/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 113 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holiday Inn Hotel near 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4,500 meters to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID nd Address 3600 N. 2 Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 25 m – E Elevation Traffic count 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16829 Rooftop 33.4901 -112.0767 337 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Temp/RH Urban Haze Urban Haze Urban Urban 12/01/1992 12/01/1992 Site Photos Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 11/2008 Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 114 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Site Purpose: monitor urban haze. The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located on Holiday Inn Hotel 4,500 meters to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 120 m – S Elevation Traffic count 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16330 Rooftop 33.5253 -112.1019 340 m 12/01/1992 Monitoring Information Bext Urban Haze Urban 12/01/1992 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 115 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. The site is located on a hilltop south of Young, AZ. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude Distance to road 250 m – N Elevation Traffic count 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16446 Dirt 34.0908 -110.9419 1,587 m 01/01/2000 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 02/10/2000 Site Photos Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 08/2008 Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 116 Prescott College AQD Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information. The site is located at Prescott College on the rooftop of the Mogollon Building (#307). The surrounding area is residential and commercial, with a high traffic street approximately 20 meters to the east and large trees to the west. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID Address 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 8m–E Elevation Traffic count 21,945 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 133011 Rooftop 34.5467 -112.4761 1,591 m 06/04/2007 Monitoring Information O3 PM 10 SLAMS ADEQ-E-BAM Neighborhood Neighborhood 03/25/2008 06/04/2007 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 117 Prescott Valley Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network. The site is located on the Prescott Police Department building about 1,100 meters to the north of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly residential with some areas of open desert. Site Information AQS ID 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID Address 7601 E. Civic Cir. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 25 m – S Elevation Traffic count 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 18392 Rooftop 34.5950 -112.3310 1,556 m 11/08/1999 Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 SLAMS SLAMS Neighborhood Neighborhood 11/08/1999 12/28/2007 Site Photos Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott Police Department – 10/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 118 Queen Valley Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, PAMS network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, and IMPROVE program. The site is operated by ADEQ and PCAQCD. The site is located 635 meters southeast of Queen Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primarily desert on the far eastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site. Site Information AQS ID 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219 County Pinal Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 87 m – W Elevation Traffic count 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information O3 NOy SLAMS/PAMS PAMS Urban Urban 05/20/2001 06/24/2002 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 04/20/2011 04/20/2011 16394 Gravel 33.2938 -111.2857 668 m 04/30/2001 VOC PAMS Urban 05/20/2001 Aerosol IMPROVE Urban 04/30/2001 Site Photos Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter at Queen Valley site – 5/10/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 119 Rillito Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement. In February of 2007 the site was moved from the Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping station. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 meters to the east. Arizona Portland Cement Company also maintains PM 10 monitors at the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID Address 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential Longitude Distance to road 7m–S Elevation Traffic count 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 Wind SLAMS ADEQ-MET Neighborhood Neighborhood 01/01/1974 01/08/2004 16499 Dirt 32.4143 -111.1545 626 m 01/01/1974 Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 3/30/2010 Site Photos Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 05/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 120 Saguaro National Park East Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located within the Saguaro National Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID Address 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730 County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude Distance to road 82 m – W Elevation Traffic count 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16474 Dirt 32.1740 -110.7360 938 m 06/04/1988 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 06/04/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 121 Saguaro National Park West Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by PDEQ and NPS and PDEQ takes care of the ADEQ monitors. The area surrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 kilometers southwest of I-10. Site Information AQS ID 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID Address N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ County Pima Groundcover CBSA Tucson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 27 m – W Elevation Traffic count 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16475 Gravel 32.2485 -111.2175 718 m 04/19/2001 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 04/19/2001 Site Photos Shelters and towers at Saguaro NP West site – 03/2003 Regional view of Saguaro NP West State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 122 San Luis Rio Colorado Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located at the Oomapas Well # 10 site at the corner of Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. The site is approximately 1,600 meters south of the Arizona-Mexico border. The surrounding area is mixed commercial and residential use. *Note this site was previously used the in WASBAQS study. AQS ID Address County CBSA Surrounding Area Distance to road Traffic count Site Information 80-026-8012 ADEQ ID 113221 Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico Sonora Groundcover Dirt None Latitude 32.4664 Commercial/Residential Longitude -114.7688 5m–S&E Elevation 41 m n/a Site Established Date 07/05/2009 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 07/05/2009 7/05/2009 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of San Luis Rio Colorado State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 123 Sedona Post Office Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site is located on the U.S. Post Office building and was established to assess particulate concentrations in the Sedona area. Currently the site is used for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the south and mainly hills to the north, east, and west. The site is located northeast of the intersection of SR 179 and SR 89A. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1010 ADEQ ID Address 190 W. Highway 89A Sedona, AZ 86336 County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 45 m – S Elevation Traffic count 25,193 – SR 89A Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16512 Rooftop 34.8667 -111.765 1,279 m 01/01/1992 Monitoring Information PM 10 ADEQ-E-BAM Neighborhood 01/01/1992 Site Photos Aerial view of Sedona Post Office E-BAM on roof of Sedona Post Office – date unkown State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 124 Show Low Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site located on the Historical Museum building and was established to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. Currently the site is used for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surrounding area is residential and commercial. Show Low is the commercial and tourism hub of the western White Mountains and sees a seasonally increase in population by 5,000 people. Site Information AQS ID 04-017-0007 ADEQ ID Address 561 E. Deuce of Clubs Show Low, AZ 85901 County Navajo Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude Distance to road 36 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 9,500 – Deuce of Clubs Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16603 Rooftop 34.2525 -110.0364 1,924 m -- Monitoring Information PM 10 ADEQ-E-BAM Neighborhood 05/25/2011 Site Photos No Photo Aerial view of Show Low State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 125 Sonora Nogales Fire Station Site Purpose: special purpose monitoring. The site is located on the rooftop of the Fire Station. Nogales, Sonora, Mexico is located just south, approximately 600 meters of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is dense urban commercial and residential use. Site Information AQS ID 80-026-0005 ADEQ ID 16399 Address Diaz and Avenue Adolfo Lopez Mateos Nogales, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop CBSA None Latitude 31.3258 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude -110.9447 Distance to road 3 m – NE Elevation 1,202 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 11/01/1993 Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information PM 10 PM 2.5 ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Neighborhood Neighborhood 11/01/1993 04/11/2010 Site Photos No photo Aerial view of Sonora Nogales Fire Station State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 126 South Phoenix Site Purpose: toxics network. The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are located north and west of the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 83 m – W Elevation Traffic count 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16377 Asphalt 33.4030 -112.0750 330 m 01/01/1997 Monitoring Information Toxics TOXICSUATMP Neighborhood 08/05/2001 Site Photos Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 127 Springerville Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information. The site is located on the roof of the Apache County Public Health Services District building. There is an open field to the south and west of the site, with SR 180/SR 260 to the east, and buildings to the north. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 County Apache Groundcover CBSA None Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 8 m – SW Elevation Traffic count 10,616 – S. Mountain Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 135133 Rooftop 34.1284 -109.2891 2,125 m 09/24/2008 Monitoring Information PM 10 ADEQ-E-BAM Neighborhood 09/24/2008 Site Photos Springerville E-BAM on roof of county building – 09/2008 Aerial view of Springerville State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 128 Sycamore Canyon Site Purpose: monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program. The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area surrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site. Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond) County Coconino Groundcover CBSA Flagstaff Latitude Surrounding Area Forest Longitude Distance to road 33 m – NW Elevation Traffic count 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16476 Dirt/Grass 35.1406 -111.9692 2,046 m 09/11/1991 Monitoring Information Aerosol IMPROVE Regional 09/11/1991 Site Photos Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 09/2008 Regional view of Sycamore Canyon State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 129 Tonto National Monument Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, downwind transport from Phoenix area, and IMPROVE program. The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roosevelt Lake about 1,000 meters to the north in Tonto National Forest. Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID Address South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545 County Gila Groundcover CBSA Payson Latitude Surrounding Area Desert Longitude Distance to road 17 m – NE Elevation Traffic count 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 16447 Dirt/Rock 33.6547 -111.1074 786 m 04/23/1988 Monitoring Information O3 Aerosol SLAMS IMPROVE Urban Urban 05/22/2002 04/23/1988 Site Photos Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 03/2008 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 130 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Site Purpose: AIR Now, AQI forecasting, PAMS, special study, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support. The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both residential and commercial, with an open field directly to the north/northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202). Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID th Address 600 N. 40 St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 County Maricopa Groundcover CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude Distance to road 66 m – E Elevation th Traffic count 12,740 – 40 St. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information Bscat/PM 2.5 Wind SPM/AIRNow ADEQ-MET Neighborhood Neighborhood 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 Monitoring Information Ultraviolet Solar Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Delta Temp Radiation Network or Program PAMS PAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 05/11/1999 08/20/2004 16363 Gravel 33.4553 -111.9961 356 m 04/01/1987 Temp/RH ADEQ-MET Neighborhood 05/11/1999 Total Horizontal Solar Radiation PAMS Neighborhood 06/18/1999 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Profiler Network or Program PAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1998 Site Photos Aerial view of Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Wind profiler, meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 04/12/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 131 Verde Ranger Station Site Purpose: monitor smoke/public information The site is located at the Verde Ranger Station in Camp Verde. The monitor is located on a metal platform that is on a concrete slab surrounded by dirt and rocks. Ranger Station buildings are to the northeast and northwest and there are solar panels to the east of the monitor. Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID Address 300 E. Highway 260 Camp Verde, AZ 86322 County Yavapai Groundcover CBSA Prescott Latitude Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude Distance to road 70 m – S Elevation Traffic count 6,075 – SR 260 Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site 138696 Dirt 34.5489 -111.8472 945 m 01/01/2008 Monitoring Information PM 10 ADEQ-E-BAM Neighborhood 01/01/2008 Site Photos Aerial view of Verde Ranger Station E-BAM on platform at Verde Ranger Station – 2/2010 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 132 Yuma Supersite Site Purpose: NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting. The site was reopened in 2008 to take the place of the Yuma Game & Fish site and is used to indicate ozone transport into the Phoenix metropolitan area from the Arizona/Mexico border. The particulate and the meteorological monitors have also been moved to this site to create one Yuma monitoring site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility property. The surrounding area is commercial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 kilometer to the northeast. Site Information AQS ID 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID Address 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364 County Yuma Groundcover CBSA Yuma Latitude Surrounding Area Commercial/Industrial Longitude Distance to road 91 m – W Elevation Traffic count 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Network or Program Spatial Scale Parameter start date at site Monitoring Information O3 PM 10 SLAMS SLAMS Neighborhood Neighborhood 05/06/2008 01/01/2010 113219 Rooftop 32.6903 -114.6144 60 m 02/01/2006 PM 2.5 SLAMS Neighborhood 01/01/2010 Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 03/17/2010 03/17/2010 Site Photos Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Met Tower at Yuma Supersite – 5/19/2011 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 133 Appendix E – 2011 EPA Monitoring Schedule State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 134 Appendix F – Bethune Elementary School Site Removal Rationale This document explains the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality’s rationale for removing the PM 10 special purpose monitor (SPM) from the Bethune Elementary School at the end of the second quarter 2011. This rationale includes the following issues: 1. Current and ongoing budgetary limitations require the redirection of non-essential (nonregulatory) resources. ADEQ no longer has the resources to conduct monitoring that is not required by regulation. The Bethune Elementary School monitor is an SPM and not required by the CFR. 2. The Maricopa County Air Quality Department’s PM 10 network provides sufficient coverage for attainment / nonattainment determinations in Maricopa County. 3. The West 43rd, Durango, South Phoenix, Greenwood, and Central Phoenix sites provide data that are representative of the Bethune Elementary School monitor. The first two issues are straightforward and likely well understood by Region 9. The third issue is examined in more detail below. It is evident from the figure, table, and graphs below that the Bethune Elementary School monitor, and the data from this monitor, is closely bracketed by the five Maricopa County monitors. The Bethune Elementary School PM 10 monitor is located within 3.5 miles of five other Maricopa County PM 10 monitors. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 135 Annual Weighted Arithmetic Mean (μg/m3) Site 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2005-2010 Average West Forty Third 73.4 80.8 71.3 56.5 50.6 39.4 62.0 Durango 65.9 69.7 59 47.7 44.4 36.2 53.8 Greenwood 51.9 52.4 49.5 42.1 41.2 34.9 45.3 58 61.2 53 43.6 44.6 30.3 48.5 South Phoenix 54.1 54.5 55 44.8 44 35 47.9 Central Phoenix 37.3 42.3 41.9 34.8 34.4 27.4 36.4 Bethune Salt River Area PM 10 Monitors - Annual Weighted Arithmetic Means Micrograms per cubic mete 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 2005 2006 Bethune Greenw ood 2007 2008 Durango Central Phoenix 2009 2010 South Phoenix West Forty Third 2005-2010 Average PM10 70.0 60.0 PM10 (ug/m3) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 West Forty Third Durango Greenw ood Bethune South Phoenix Central Phoenix* Site State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 136 Appendix G – Data Quality Indicator Report This Appendix contains the required Quality Assurance documentation for all SLAMS monitors in ADEQs SLAMS network. The Data Quality Indicator Report is for the calendar year of 2010. State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 137 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY User ID: BNE DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Report Request ID: 862423 Report Code: Apr. 19, 2011 AMP255 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS Tribal State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region 04 80 PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter PQAO SELECTIONS Method Duration Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality APP_A_PARAMETERS SELECTED OPTIONS Option Type Option Value INCLUDE ONLY APPENDIX A MONITORS RESTRICT TO MONITORING SEASONS MERGE PDF FILES NO YES YES GLOBAL DATES Start Date 2010 01 01 End Date 2010 12 31 Selection Criteria Page 1 Method Duration Begin Date End Date UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Notes About this Report For specific information about the fields appearing within this report, please refer to the README.txt file that is included with the WORKFILE output for this report. M If you see this value for a column in a summarized row, this means that more than one occurence exist in the summary. For example, if you have a PQAO summary that spans multiple States, you would see this value in the States column. Code Listing The following codes may be seen in the "MT" column throughout this report. Please be advised that not all of the codes may appear in the report. They are provided for completeness. Code NR P SP NC ID NA F PN VS X SU TS UP M Description NON-REGULATORY PAMS SPECIAL PURPOSE NCORE INDUSTRIAL NATTS NON-EPA FEDERAL PROPOSED NCORE VOL SCHOOL AT SECURED SUPLMNTL SPECIATION TRENDS SPECIATION UNOFFICIAL PAMS WMO Code S T I IX N CN O ST QA SS SU U W Description SLAMS TRIBAL MONITORS IMPROVE INDEX SITE NAMS CASTNET OTHER SCHOOL AIR TOXICS QA COLLOCATED SLAMS SPECIATION SUPPLMNTL SPECIATION UNKNOWN WHO Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 1-Point Quality Control Pollutant: CO Year 2010 2010 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 AZ 04-013-9997 AZ SUMMARY AZ Pollutant: NO2 Year 2010 2010 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY Region State 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ Pollutant: SO2 Year 2010 2010 2010 Region State 09 09 09 1 S 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 26 26 26 24 24 24 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs AZ 04-013-9997 AZ SUMMARY AZ Pollutant: O3 Year PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 1 S 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 26 26 26 19 19 19 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 04-005-1008 04-007-0010 04-012-8000 04-013-9997 04-021-8001 04-025-8033 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S S S S-NC S S S 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-DEC-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 15 15 15 26 15 15 15 116 116 15 13 15 24 13 15 15 110 110 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End # Req Date Date Site ID POC MT # Obs AZ 04-007-0009 AZ 04-007-1001 AZ 04-013-9997 1 3 1 S S S 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 26 26 26 Page 2 of 11 22 27 25 % Complete CV 92 92 92 4.43 4.43 4.43 Bias 73 73 73 3.55 3.55 3.55 - 3.45 - 3.45 - 3.45 100 87 100 92 87 100 100 95 95 0.75 1.30 1.69 2.12 1.24 0.99 1.07 1.51 1.51 % Complete CV 85 100 96 3.92 3.55 4.09 App A?: Yes App A?: Yes App A?: Yes +/- 3.65 +/- 3.65 +/- 3.65 CV CV Yes Bias % Complete % Complete App A?: Bias + + + + + + +/+ + 1.69 1.24 3.34 1.72 1.03 2.35 0.65 1.53 1.53 Bias +/- 3.16 - 3.20 +/- 3.24 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 1-Point Quality Control Pollutant: SO2 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 78 74 2010 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 78 74 AZ Page 3 of 11 App A?: % Complete CV 94 94 3.61 3.61 Bias +/- 2.89 +/- 2.89 Yes UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Annual Performance Evaluations Pollutant: CO PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Date Date 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 Avg %D / Level L2 L3 L4 Year Region State Site ID POC MT L1 0.95 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S 2010 09 0.95 AZ SUMMARY 2010 09 0.95 SUMMARY 09 AZ PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: NO2 Begin End Date Date 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 End Date 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-DEC-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 Year 2010 2010 2010 Region 09 09 09 State Site ID POC AZ 04-007-0009 1 AZ 04-007-1001 3 AZ 04-013-9997 1 MT S S S Begin End Date Date 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 -0.82 -0.98 -0.82 -0.98 -0.82 L1 L5 2.81 2.05 2.81 2.05 2.81 2.05 Avg %D / Level L2 L3 L4 Year Region State Site ID POC MT L1 0.00 -1.25 -2.00 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S 09 2010 -2.63 -1.28 -0.68 AZ 04-007-0010 1 S 09 2010 0.00 2.63 0.00 AZ 04-012-8000 1 S 09 2010 -7.32 -4.94 -2.65 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S-NC 09 2010 0.66 2.38 0.00 AZ 04-021-8001 1 S 09 2010 0.00 0.00 -1.33 AZ 04-025-8033 1 S 09 2010 0.00 2.44 0.00 AZ 04-027-8011 1 S 09 2010 -0.36 -1.07 -0.86 AZ SUMMARY 09 2010 -0.36 -1.07 -0.86 SUMMARY 09 AZ Pollutant: SO2 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) L5 -0.98 Avg %D / Level L2 L3 L4 Year Region State Site ID POC MT L1 5.93 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S 2010 09 5.93 SUMMARY AZ 2010 09 5.93 SUMMARY 09 AZ PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: O3 Begin Date 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 App A?: Yes L5 -1.99 -2.60 -0.81 -0.71 0.00 -1.18 -1.99 -1.17 0.40 0.47 -1.60 -1.89 -0.40 0.00 -0.91 -1.01 -0.91 -1.01 Avg %D / Level L2 L3 L4 L5 5.76 5.92 1.66 0.05 -0.31 -4.00 -4.80 -4.82 5.00 Page 4 of 11 1-Point % Btwn Conf. Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 4 4 4 4 Y 4 4 4 4 100 -6.59 7.35 88 4 4 4 4 100 -6.59 7.35 88 App A?: Yes 1-Point % Btwn Conf. Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 0 4 4 0 Y 0 4 4 0 100 -7.27 3.53 63 0 4 4 0 100 -7.27 3.53 63 App A?: Yes 1-Point % Btwn Conf. Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 0 5 0 0 Y 0 0 5 0 Y 0 0 5 0 Y 0 0 5 0 Y 0 0 5 0 Y 0 5 0 0 Y 0 5 0 0 Y 0 15 20 0 100 -1.52 3.88 71 0 15 20 0 100 -1.52 3.88 71 App A?: Yes 1-Point Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 0 0 4 0 Y 3 0 4 4 Y 0 3 0 0 Y % Btwn Conf. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Annual Performance Evaluations Pollutant: SO2 App A?: Yes PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Year Region State Site ID POC 2010 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 AZ MT Begin Date End Date L1 Avg %D / Level L2 L3 L4 L5 0.89 0.34 0.26 0.89 0.34 0.26 Page 5 of 11 1-Point Obs / Q Criteria Conf. Limits Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Met? Lower Upper 6.18 3 3 8 4 100 -6.44 6.18 3 3 8 4 100 -6.44 % Btwn Conf. 100 100 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Flow Rate Verifications Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 14 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-003-0011 1 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-003-0011 2 QA 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-003-1005 1 S 2010 09 12 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-007-0008 1 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-007-0008 2 QA 2010 09 15 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-007-1001 3 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-013-8006 1 SP 2010 09 14 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-013-9997 3 S 2010 09 12 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-015-1003 1 S 2010 09 14 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-019-0001 3 S 2010 09 5 2 01-JAN-10 30-MAR-10 S 2010 09 AZ 04-019-0020 1 11 9 01-APR-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-019-0020 3 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-023-0004 1 S 2010 09 15 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-023-0004 3 SP 2010 09 12 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-025-2002 1 S 2010 09 13 12 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 AZ 04-027-8011 3 S 2010 09 215 191 AZ SUMMARY 2010 09 SUMMARY 09 215 191 AZ Average %D 0.09 -0.68 -2.40 -0.94 0.11 -0.29 -1.65 -0.28 -0.97 0.37 -0.23 0.41 -0.06 -0.15 -0.21 -0.04 -1.42 -0.54 -0.54 % Complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Page 6 of 11 Average %D -0.27 -0.75 1.03 -0.28 -0.34 0.16 0.18 -0.16 -0.05 -0.05 % Complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Yes App A?: Yes Bias +/- 1.74 +/- 1.88 - 5.98 - 1.48 +/- 1.54 +/- 1.07 - 2.55 +/- 1.04 - 1.86 + 0.95 +/- 1.03 + 0.71 +/- 2.83 +/- 1.47 +/- 0.92 +/- 0.77 - 1.73 +/- 1.38 +/- 1.38 Pollutant: PM2.5 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Year # Req Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date # Obs 12 13 AZ 04-003-1005 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S 2010 12 12 AZ 04-005-1008 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S 2010 13 12 AZ 04-013-9997 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S-NC 2010 13 12 AZ 04-013-9997 2 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 QA 2010 13 12 AZ 04-023-0004 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S 2010 13 12 AZ 04-023-0004 2 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 QA 2010 12 12 AZ 04-025-2002 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S 2010 13 12 AZ 04-027-8011 1 09 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 S 2010 96 102 09 AZ SUMMARY 2010 SUMMARY 09 96 102 AZ App A?: Bias +/- 1.14 - 1.53 + 1.63 +/- 1.60 +/- 1.21 + 1.21 +/- 0.42 +/- 0.92 +/- 1.01 +/- 1.01 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) App A?: No Flow Rate Avg Conf. Limits % Between Criteria Begin End % #Q Obs / Q Year # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 %d Lower Upper Conf. Limits Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date 0 N MX 80-026-0005 1 NR-SP 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 0 2010 25 2 0 N MX 80-026-1000 1 NR-SP 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 0 2010 25 2 0 0 MX SUMMARY 0 2010 25 4 SUMMARY 25 0 0 MX 0 4 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: PM10 App A?: Yes Begin Date 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 Criteria End % #Q Date # Req w/ Data Complete Met? Q1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 2 Y 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 N 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 N 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 2 N 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 Y 0 0 30-MAR-10 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 1 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 Y 2 2 31-DEC-10 0 100 82 32 32 8 100 82 32 32 8 Year Region State Site ID POC MT AZ 04-003-0011 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-003-0011 2 09 QA 2010 AZ 04-003-1005 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-005-1008 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-007-0008 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-007-0008 2 09 QA 2010 AZ 04-007-1001 3 09 S 2010 AZ 04-013-8006 1 09 SP 2010 AZ 04-013-9997 3 09 S 2010 AZ 04-015-1003 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-019-0001 3 09 S 2010 AZ 04-019-0020 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-019-0020 3 09 S 2010 AZ 04-023-0004 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-023-0004 3 09 SP 2010 AZ 04-025-2002 1 09 S 2010 AZ 04-027-8011 3 09 S 2010 AZ SUMMARY 09 2010 SUMMARY 09 AZ PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Pollutant: PM2.5 Criteria Page 7 of 11 Obs / Q Q2 Q3 Q4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Flow Rate Avg Conf. Limits % Between %d Lower Upper Conf. Limits -0.1 1.0 -1.7 -1.6 -2.0 -0.8 -0.6 -1.3 -1.5 0.6 -1.4 2 0 0 1 1 9 9 -3.4 -0.6 -1.3 -1.0 -3.2 -1.3 -4.72 -1.3 -4.72 0 1 1 0 0 8 8 Obs / Q 1 0 0 1 1 8 8 3.64 97 3.64 97 App A?: Yes Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits Pollutant: PM2.5 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Year Region State Site ID POC MT 2010 09 AZ 04-003-1005 1 S 2010 09 AZ 04-005-1008 1 S 2010 09 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S-NC 2010 09 AZ 04-013-9997 2 QA 2010 09 AZ 04-023-0004 1 S 2010 09 AZ 04-023-0004 2 QA 2010 09 AZ 04-025-2002 1 S 2010 09 AZ 04-027-8011 1 S 2010 09 AZ SUMMARY SUMMARY 09 AZ Begin Date 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 Criteria End % #Q Date # Req w/ Data Complete Met? 2 2 100 Y 31-DEC-10 2 2 100 N 31-DEC-10 Y 2 3 100 31-DEC-10 Y 2 2 100 31-DEC-10 2 2 100 Y 31-DEC-10 2 2 100 Y 31-DEC-10 Y 2 2 100 31-DEC-10 Y 2 2 100 31-DEC-10 88 16 17 100 88 16 17 100 Page 8 of 11 App A?: Yes Obs / Q Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 Avg %d -1.0 -1.6 0.5 -1.0 -0.8 -0.7 -1.4 -2.1 -0.9 -0.9 Flow Rate Conf. Limits % Between Lower Upper Conf. Limits -2.29 -2.29 2.19 2.19 76 76 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Collocation Detail Pollutant: PM10 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Parameter Year # Req Method Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date Code 81102 AZ 04-003-0011 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 30 2010 09 1 S 81102 AZ 04-007-0008 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 30 2010 09 1 S Pollutant: PM2.5 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) Begin End Parameter Year # Req Method Region State Site ID POC MT Date Date Code 88101 30 09 AZ 04-023-0004 S 02-JAN-10 28-DEC-10 2010 1 143 88101 30 2010 09 AZ 04-013-9997 1 S-NC 02-JAN-10 31-DEC-10 145 Page 9 of 11 # Obs 55 58 # Obs 57 111 # Valid 54 58 # Valid 56 107 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 9.40 100 100 7.67 App A?: Yes % CV Complete 11.94 100 100 8.08 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Collocation Summary Pollutant: PM10 Year 2010 SUMMARY Method Pollutant: PM10 Year 2010 SUMMARY Method PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Region State # Sites Required Collocated Collocated # Req 30 MX 25 2 1 0 0 MX 25 0 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Region State # Sites Required Collocated Collocated # Req AZ 60 09 100 13 2 2 AZ 09 100 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) # Collocated # Actually % Req. Sites Year Region State # Sites Required Collocated Method Collocated # Req AZ 09 100 30 5 1 2010 143 1 AZ 30 09 100 1 1 2010 145 1 SUMMARY AZ 09 100 2010 SUMMARY AZ 09 100 # Obs 0 # Valid Obs 0 0 % Complete 0 0 # Obs 113 # Valid Obs 112 112 % Complete 100 100 # Valid Obs 56 107 163 163 % Complete 100 100 100 100 Page 10 of 11 No App A?: Yes App A?: Yes CV CV 8.15 8.15 Pollutant: PM2.5 # Obs 57 111 App A?: CV 11.94 8.08 9.48 9.48 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT Apr. 19, 2011 Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) Pollutant: PM2.5 PQAO: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) #PEP % # PEP # Collocated # Collocated Year Region State # Sites Required Collected PEP Req PEP Coll. Complete Bias 2010 09 AZ 6 8 0 0 25 2 SUMMARY 09 AZ 25 Page 11 of 11 App A?: Conf. Limits Lower Upper Yes