Division of Behavioral Health Services and Arizona State Hospital ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015 Douglas A. Ducey, Governor Cara M. Christ, MD, Director Arizona Department of Health Services Margery Ault, Interim Deputy Director Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Behavioral Health Services Aaron Bowen, Psy.D., Deputy Director/CEO Arizona Department of Health Services Arizona State Hospital Submitted Pursuant to A.R.S. §36-3405 (A) (B) (C) Published By: Arizona Department of Health Services th 150 North 18 Avenue Phoenix Arizona 85007 (602) 364-4558 ~Health and Wellness for All Arizonans~ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ADHS/DBHS PROGRAMMATIC AND FINANCIAL ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ................................................................................................... 3 Table 1: Statewide Revenue by Program FY 2015 ................................................................... 4 Table 2: Total ADHS/DBHS Services and Administration Expenditures ................................... 4 Table 3: Administrative Expenditures ...................................................................................... 5 Table 4: Statewide Expenditures by Program .......................................................................... 5 Table 5: ADHS/DBHS Clients Enrolled in FY 2015 ..................................................................... 6 Table 6: ADHS/DBHS Clients Served in FY 2015 ....................................................................... 7 II. ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL ANNUAL REPORT FY 2015 ............................................................... 9 Vision and Mission Statements…………….…………………………………………………………………….………..9 Description of the Arizona State Hospital ................................................................................ 9 Leadership .............................................................................................................................. 10 Personnel ................................................................................................................................ 11 Hospital Program Overview ................................................................................................... 12 Admission, Discharge & Census Data ..................................................................................... 13 Hospital-wide Operational and Environmental Improvements…………………………………………..14 Hospital-wide Condition of Existing Equipment.............................……………………………………..15 Strategic Initiatives ................................................................................................................. 16 Promoting Quality Care .......................................................................................................... 17 Commitment to Quality Care ................................................................................................. 18 Hospital Budget ...................................................................................................................... 21 Permission to quote from or reproduce materials from this publication is granted when due acknowledgement is made. Page 2 DIVISION OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAMMATIC AND FINANCIAL REPORT Introduction The Arizona Department of Health Services/Division of Behavioral Health Services (ADHS/DBHS) submits the following programmatic and financial Annual Report for fiscal year 2015, in compliance with Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) §36-3405(a)(b) and (c). The report identifies the number of clients served by Geographic Service Area (GSA), funding category and program; and includes programmatic financial reports of revenues, expenditures and administrative costs. ADHS/DBHS received a total of $1,984,559,696 in funding for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015. ADHS/DBHS’ statewide service costs totaled $1,916,617,855 and administrative costs totaled $23,909,742. The following information identifies ADHS/DBHS’ revenues and expenditures, including specific identification of administrative costs for each behavioral health program, by the following categories: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Seriously Mentally Ill; Alcohol and Drug Abuse; Severely Emotionally Handicapped Children; Domestic Violence; and The Arizona State Hospital. Revenues and Expenditures Tables 1 through 4, provide ADHS/DBHS’ FY2015 annual revenues and expenditures. Revenue tables are compiled and categorized based on legislative appropriations, federal grant awards, and intergovernmental agreements which in some cases may not agree with categories as specified in ARS § 36-3405(B). ADHS/DBHS does not categorize members and services for domestic violence; therefore, this category is not itemized in the report. Attachment A provides detailed information on the Arizona State Hospital. Page 3 Table 1: Statewide Revenue by Program FY 2015 Statewide Revenue by Program FY 2015 Funding Amount Received Title XIX Children 502,061,055 TXXI Children 871,651 TXIX SMI Non Integrated 305,236,782 TXIX SMI Integrated Acute 116,151,305 TXIX SMI Integrated Behavioral 411,809,174 Non TXIX SMI/Other (1) 95,488,000 TXXI SMI 90,579 TXIX GMH/SA 407,081,172 Housing 7,324,800 Federal Grants (2) 43,228,344 ISA/IGA 55,773,476 Administration 25,342,658 Clawback 14,100,700 Total 1,984,559,696 Percentage 25.30% 0.04% 15.38% 5.85% 20.75% 4.81% 0.01% 20.51% .37% 2.18% 2.81% 1.28% .71% 100.00% (1) Other Includes: Crisis & Mental Health First Aid (2) Funding for Federal Grants includes funding for administration Source Data: Accounting Event Data Warehouse Table 2: Total ADHS/DBHS Services and Administration Expenditures Total Behavioral Health Services Expenditures Services & Administration FY 2015 Funding Title XIX Amount Paid Percentage 1,118,498,215 57.64% 605,841,933 31.22% Title XXI 1,744,168 0.09% Federal Funds 44,219,499 2.28% Non Title XIX/XXI Funds General Funds 111,716,922 5.76% County Funds 56,731,894 2.92% Senate Bill 1616 822,498 0.04% Other (1) 952,468 0.05% Title XIX Proposition 204 Total 1,940,527,597 100.00% (1) Other Includes: PASRR, Bridge Subsidy, Indirect Funds, Liquor Fees & City of Phoenix Page 4 Table 3: Administrative Expenditures Administrative Expenditures FY 2015 Funding Amount Paid Title XIX 13,929,428 Title XIX Proposition 204 5,622,454 Title XXI 80,879 Federal Funds 2,122,399 Non Title XIX/XXI Funds General Funds 741,961 County Funds 1,258,012 Other (1) 154,609 Total 23,909,742 Percentage 58.26% 23.52% 0.34% 8.88% 3.10% 5.26% 0.64% 100.00% (1) Other Includes PASRR & Indirect Funds Source Data: Accounting Event Data Warehouse Table 4: Statewide Expenditures by Program Statewide Expenditures by Program FY 2015 Funding Title XIX Children Amount Paid 472,082,935 Percentage 24.63% Non TXIX Children 8,315,159 0.43% TXXI Children TXIX SMI Non Integrated TXIX SMI Integrated Acute 1,446,594 308,560,513 116,850,745 .08% 16.10% 6.10% TXIX SMI Integrated Behavioral Non TXIX SMI TXXI SMI 414,289,003 148,959,582 216,694 21.61% 7.77% 0.01% TXIX GMH/SA Non TXIX GMH/SA 393,005,070 21,747,100 20.51% 1.13% Crisis 22,400,534 1.17% Non TXIX Prevention Other Programs (1) 8,680,051 63,875 0.45% 0.01% 1,916,617,855 100.00% Total (1) Other Includes Liquor Fees Source Data: Accounting Event Data Warehouse Page 5 During FY 2015, behavioral health recipients received behavioral health services as depicted in the following tables: Table 5 provides information on the number of ADHS/BHS clients enrolled during SFY15 and Table 6 provides information on the number of clients who were served under the following assumptions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Client eligibility is broken out into TXIX/TXXI and Non-TXIX. Client behavioral health category is to be broken out into Seriously Mentally Ill (SMI), Substance Abuse (SA), General Mental Health (GMH), Serious Emotional Disturbed Children (SED) and Children (CHILD). Children and SED are less than 18 years of age. Adults with behavioral health category SMI, SA, and GMH are 18 years of age or older. "Served" in this report means that the client had at least one encounter in FY 2015. The number of enrolled members differs from the number of members served because (a) certain services cannot be encountered, such as prevention services (b) persons do not need to be enrolled to receive certain kinds of services such as crisis phone services, and (c) some enrolled members did not present for any services during the time period. Non-Title 19/21 records use all encounter records. Encounters for T19/T21 consumers were included only if they have been approved at AHCCCS (Encounter-Status = “AP”) or it was a Non-T19 encounter service code. Table 5: ADHS/DBHS Clients Enrolled in FY 2015 Clients Enrolled in FY 2015 Eligibility TXIX/TXXI BHC Count CHILD 68,958 GMH/SA 134,814 SED 13,701 SMI 42,046 Total NON-TXIX All Eligibilities 259,519 CHILD 3,139 GMH/SA 25,153 SED 204 SMI 5,161 Total 33,657 CHILD GMH/SA SED SMI 72,097 159,967 13,905 47,207 Total 293,176 1 All data sources are effective as of month-end October 2015 (unless otherwise noted) Page 6 Table 6: ADHS/DBHS Clients Served in FY 2015 Clients Served in FY 2015 Note: The term “served” defined as clients that had at least one encounter in FY 2015 Eligibility TXIX/TXXI* BHC Count CHILD 62,045 GMH 118,826 SED 13,301 SMI NON-TXIX** All Eligibilities 40,819 Total 234,991 CHILD 2,823 GMH 22,646 SED 178 SMI 5,008 Total 30,655 CHILD 64,868 GMH 141,472 SED 13,479 SMI 45,827 Total 265,646 *Title 19/21 encounters were included only if they have been approved at AHCCCS (Encounter-Status = “AP”) or it was a Non-19 encounter service code. **Non-Title 19/21 records use all encounter records. 1 All data sources are effective as of month-end October 2015 (unless otherwise noted). 2 BHSD.QM_ENRL_SRVD_SFY2015 H78DWH.H78_SNAP_DEMOG_TRANS H78DWH.H78_SNAP_CLIENT_DEMOG H78DWH.H78_SNAP_BHS_CLIENT H78DWH.H78_SNAP_AHCCCS_ENROLLMENT H74CIS.78_SNAP_CLIENTS_COMMON 3 BHSD.QM_ENCOUNTER_2015FY BHSD.QM_B2_BILL_TYPE BHSD.QM_B2_DESC_REF BHSD.QM_B2_MED_MOD_REF BHSD.QM_B2_PROCEDURE_REF BHSD.QM_B2_REVENUE_REF H78DWH.H78_SNAP_ENCOUNTER H78DWH.H78_SNAP_CLIENTS_COMMON H78DWH.H78_SNAP_PROV_DEMOGRAPHICS H78DWH.H78_5010_SNAP_HCFA_ENC H78DWH.H78_5010_SNAP_UB_ENC H78DWH.H78_5010_SNAP_NCPDP_ENC Page 7 Notes: 1. If the data in this report will be reproduced in a different format (another report, graph, etc), please remove the footers which reference Bureau of Business Information Systems Staff and publish under your own name/department. 2. The data in this report may not match data from the Enrollment-Penetration Report due to the reconciliation of data over time and the use of snapshot versions of the production tables. 3. This report/data is the property of the Arizona Department of Health Services. The file contains information that may be privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure by applicable law. It is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you receive this communication in error, please do not retain or distribute it. Please notify the Bureau of Business Information Systems at 602364-4740 and destroy the file immediately. Page 8 ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL Vision & Mission Statements The Arizona State Hospital (ASH) is part of the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). The Department of Health Services has the following Vision and Mission Statements:   Vision: Health and Wellness for all Arizonans Mission: To promote, protect, and improve the health and wellness of individuals and communities in Arizona. ADHS is currently in the process of rebranding, and a new logo is expected within the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. ASH will follow suit with a logo redesign. Also, new vision and mission statements have been developed by leadership. The following statements will become effective once a new logo is selected:   Vision: Quality, Compassion, and Excellence in the Provision of Care Mission: Provide evidence-based, recovery-oriented, and trauma-informed care to the individuals receiving care at Arizona State Hospital in order to facilitate their successful transition to the lease restrictive alternative possible. Description of the Arizona State Hospital (ASH) ASH is located on a 93-acre campus at 24th Street and Van Buren, in Phoenix, Arizona. ASH provides long-term inpatient psychiatric care to Arizonans with serious mental illness. The facility operates programs within a 260-bed funded facility, is accredited by the Joint Commission, and the Civil Hospital is certified to receive reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Also located on the campus is the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center (ACPTC). The ACPTC is a 100-bed funded facility that provides care, supervision and treatment for those persons court-ordered into the program as sexually violent persons. Authorized by A.R.S. § 36-201 through 36-207, ASH is required to provide inpatient care and treatment to patients with mental disorders, personality disorders or emotional conditions. ASH strives to protect the rights and privileges of each patient, particularly the patients’ right to confidentiality and privacy. Treatment at ASH is considered “the highest and most restrictive” level of care in the state. Patients are admitted as a result of an inability to be maintained in a community facility or due to their legal status. Hospital personnel endeavor to provide state-of-the-art inpatient psychiatric care and are committed to treating patients and personnel with dignity and respect. Interdisciplinary care is delivered in collaboration with the patient, family, legal representatives and community providers with a focus on recovery and community reintegration. Page 9 Leadership Leadership is the key to developing and maintaining a culture of change. New ideas and perspectives are important in creating an environment for change. Overall governance for ASH is provided by the ASH Governing Body. The Director of the ADHS chairs this committee. The Governing Body consists of the Director of ADHS, a representative from the ADHS Central Budget Office, an ASH Physician, Community Representatives (including family and consumers), the ASH Chief Executive Officer (Superintendent), the ASH Chief Medical Officer, a Consumer Advocate (Legal System), and a Mental Health Provider (Psychiatrist or Psychologist). ASH receives overall direction from the Chief Executive Officer, who reports to the Director of ADHS. The CEO directs the various leaders of ASH, who comprise the Executive Management Team (EMT). The Executive Management Team oversees hospital operations, establishes administrative policies and procedures and directs ASH planning activities. The members of EMT are:          Aaron Bowen, Psy.D., Chief Executive Officer Steven Dingle, M.S, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Ryan Hoffmeyer, M.B.A, Chief Operating Officer Debra Taylor, R.N., Chief Nursing Officer Tiffany Williams, RN-BC, CPHQ, Chief Quality Officer Margaret McLaughlin, M.S., Chief Compliance Officer Shanda Payne, L.M.S.W, ACPTC Director Levada Coker, Human Resources Manager Larry Diffie, Campus Support and Safety Manager The Chief Medical Officer (CMO) is responsible for managing the following services: Psychiatric Providers, contracted medical doctors, contracted laboratory, pharmacy, psychology, social work, and rehabilitation services such as occupational therapy, recreational therapy and psychosocial rehabilitation. The Chief Operating Officer (COO) is responsible for managing financial and administrative support services, facilities management, dietary services, managing the environment of care, promoting the wellness and safety of the patients and staff and management of environmental and housekeeping services. The Chief Quality Officer (CQO) is responsible for maintaining the hospital-wide quality management program including: quality assurance and performance improvement activities, data analytics, staff training, and special investigations. The Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) is responsible for hospital-wide compliance with the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) Services regulations, Arizona State Rules and The Page 10 Joint Commission standards; development of policies and procedures; grievances and appeals, and health records. The Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) oversees and assures the provision of quality psychiatric and medical nursing services for patients and coordination of nursing care based on individual patient needs. The Campus Support and Safety Manager is responsible for overall monitoring and safety duties of the hospital. The Human Resources Manager is responsible for compensation and benefits, employee relations, recruitment and retention. The Director of ACPTC is responsible for managing the day-to-day clinical and administrative operations for the Sexually Violent Persons Program. Personnel Data on Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for fiscal year 2015 is presented below. This information was taken from the last payroll record of each month for the entire fiscal year. Employee turnover per month is also provided below. Page 11 Hospital Program Overview ASH has three (3) separate components: The Civil Hospital, Forensic Hospital and the ACPTC. Civil adult patients are involuntarily court ordered to ASH if they have not responded to a minimum of 25 days in a community hospital setting. Forensic patients are court-ordered for pre- or post-trial treatment as a result of involvement with the criminal justice system due to a mental health issue. ASH has three Population-Based Programs. Patients are housed separately in accordance with legal, treatment and/or security issues as follows: Civil Adult Rehabilitation Program (116 beds) consists of six (6) treatment units specializing in providing services to adults who are civilly committed as a danger to self, danger to others, gravely disabled and/or persistently and acutely disabled, who have completed a mandatory 25 days of treatment in a community inpatient setting prior to admission. Medical beds are also available. Forensic Adult Program (143 beds) consists of court-ordered commitments through a criminal process for either:  Pre-Trial Restoration to Competence Program (“RTC”): These patients are currently housed on one unit providing pre-trial evaluation, treatment, and restoration to competency to stand trial.  Post-Trial Forensic Program: These patients are adjudicated as Guilty Except Insane (“GEI”) serving determinate sentences under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), or for those adjudicated prior to 1994 as Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (“NGRI”). These patients are currently housed on five separate units.  Community Reintegration Program: These patients are adjudicated as either NGRI or GEI with a Conditional Release Plan approved by the PSRB for transition into the community. Page 12 Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center (ACPTC) (100 beds) On the grounds of ASH is the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center (ACPTC). The ACPTC is statutorily mandated (ARS §36-3701, §13-4601 - §13-4618). It is a separately licensed facility of ASH. ASH is responsible for the oversight and management of the facility. ACPTC provides care, supervision and treatment for those persons court-ordered into the program while protecting the community from sexually violent offenders. There are several types of residents at ACPTC:  Pre-Trial Detainee Residents: Pre-trial residents are awaiting a court decision to determine their sexually violent person (SVP) status.  Treatment Resident (Full Confinement): Residents in this program have been adjudicated as SVP pursuant to A.R.S. §36-3701-3717 and have been committed to treatment. Full confinement residents can only leave the grounds for court-ordered legal proceedings and medical appointments during this phase of treatment.  Less Restrictive Alternative (LRA): "Less restrictive alternative" means court ordered treatment in a setting that is less restrictive than total confinement and that is conducted in a setting approved by the CEO of ASH. LRA residents are conditionally released to begin community reintegration activities. Residents in LRA are monitored via Global Position System (GPS) satellite.  LRA Level 6 Resident: Residents are ready for community living placement. Only the court can order a resident to Level 6 status. Once the court orders a resident into Community Based Living (LRA Level 6), the resident is expected to find suitable housing and employment and begin community reintegration under strict supervision by ACPTC. Admission, Discharge, & Census Data for Treatment Programs In fiscal year 2015, ASH encountered 55 admissions and 79 discharges, as detailed below: Type Civil Forensic (RTC) Forensic (GEI) Forensic (GEI-75) Forensic (NGRI) Forensic (Other)* ACPTC (Pre-Trial) ACPTC (Treatment) Admissions and Discharges - FY 2015 Admissions 17 10 19 8 0 1 11 5 Discharges 39 9 19 10 1 1 15 2 *ASH had a same day admission and discharge for a patient admitted under Title 31-226F Petition for Transfer Page 13 ASH collects census data by population to meet the maximum funded capacity. For fiscal year 2015, the funded capacity and allocation of ASH’s beds was as follows. The funded capacity of fiscal year 2014 was the same (260 beds). Funded Hospital Capacity - FY 2015 Type Total Hospital Beds Forensic (Adult) Civil (Adult) Civil (Medical bed for Infection Control) Number 260 143 (58% ) 116 (42%) 1 Funded ACPTC Capacity - FY 2015 Type Total ACPTC Beds Number 100 The average daily census for fiscal year 2015 was 242.63. The average daily census distribution was as follows: Average Daily Hospital Census and Distribution - FY 2015 Civil Forensic (RTC) Forensic (GEI) Forensic (GEI-75) Forensic (NGRI) 111 3 103 1 13 Average Daily ACPTC Census and Distribution - FY 2015 ACPTC (Pre-Trial) ACPTC (Treatment – Full Confinement) ACPTC (Least Restrictive Alternative) 12 18 72 Hospital-wide Operational & Environmental Improvements ASH is continuously striving to create a safe and secure environment of care for the patients and staff alike, as well as providing more technology to assist in the delivery of care for our staff. The following are improvements for the past year:  ASH went live with an EHR (Electronic Health Record) replacement (MyAvatar from Netsmart) and a new Pharmacy application (Rx Connect). These applications contain functionality to meet the more stringent CMS and Joint Commission requirements. These upgrades replaced both the legacy EHR from 2004 that ran on an outdated Windows XP platform and the legacy free-standing Pharmacy application. The new applications run on Windows 7 and are housed in a remote hosting center that provides the latest security patches and Windows upgrades and ensures Disaster Recovery support. The new applications include the following functionality: Page 14 1) Provides integration among the EHR, Pharmacy, and the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). This provides a “closed loop” where a provider places a medication order and the order goes directly to the pharmacy for verification and also to the eMAR for nursing to administer the medication. 2) Previously, orders would print in the Pharmacy and then need to be re-entered by Pharmacy staff into the Pharmacy system. This created more opportunities for medication errors due to additional manual entry of orders. 3) Previously, nursing staff on the floors kept up a hand written Medication Administration Record. Now the medication administration record is electronic and is fully integrated with both the physician orders and the pharmacy system and allergy checking.  Current EHR projects include electronic lab orders and results interfaces and referrals interfacing with Maricopa Medical Center (one of the Maricopa Integrated Health System facilities).  A new Quality Management System (QMS) was built to allow users at ASH to create Incident Reports electronically and for reports to be generated using this database for quality improvement opportunities.  Continuing to improve on the hospital-wide fire and smoke detection and suppression system. Phase II of a III phase project was kicked off this year to promote our commitment to patient and staff safety.  The campus power plant received a new centrifugal chiller to assist with the production cold water for the units and provide cool air for the patients and staff during the Arizona summers. This project also included a new system to assist with the control of the heating and cooling of the units from a centralized area. Hospital-wide Condition of Existing Equipment Over the past fiscal year, ASH monitored the equipment for performance and efficiency and outlined the capital equipment needs in the 2017 CIP report that provided insight as to needed equipment for operations. This report focuses on the equipment that is coming closer to end of life and will need attention in the near future:  Power plant boiler replacement – failing equipment is scheduled to be replaced with multiple heat condenser units in the power plant.  Chiller replacements – the power plant is also in need of two replacement chillers to provide a reliable source of cooling capacity that will adequately meet our demands during the summer months. Page 15  Cooling Towers – the addition of two new cooling towers will assist the power plant and the cooling system in a more energy efficient process that will also provide ASH with additional cooling capacity in warmer temperatures. Strategic Initiatives During this fiscal year, ASH continues to work on the strategic initiatives that were developed in 2014. The strategies were developed with input from all levels and disciplines of staff. The focus of these initiatives was a culture of safety to improve patient and resident outcomes. Below are some of the milestones achieved since their inception. Note: These initiatives will be revised in fiscal year 2016. Strategic Initiatives – 2014-2015 Strategy Milestones Strategy 1 – Create a safe campus by  New visitation policy was approved by ASH improving staff and patient safety by clarifying that clarifies processes for patients and visitation procedures, improving contraband visitors control, and increasing safety and training  Additional cameras were added to the Civil drills. Hospital and upgraded cameras were added to the Forensic Hospital. Strategy 2 – Coordinate care for patients and  A new electronic Medication residents by improving patient outcomes Administration (eMAR) was implemented. through revised treatment plans and plan 100% of available nurses were trained on participation, medication use and improved this document. progress note process.  Nursing Care Plans were instituted to ensure those issues that are ever-changing and/or need additional attention/care from nursing are addressed and documented in real time.  Electronic versions of several nursing assessment forms have been implemented. Strategy 3 – Connecting with the community  ASH has expanded its tour schedule to the by educating and outreaching to the community and increased the number of community to increase awareness about the schools and other organizations who have hospital and mental health. attended these tours. Strategy 4 – Maintaining continual compliance  ASH has added additional resources to the with CMS, The Joint Commission, and licensing Quality Resource Management team by improving processes, policies, and Quality including: a Quality Assurance Manager; Management. four Quality Assurance Specialists; a Performance Improvement Manager; two Performance Improvement Specialists; a Chief Compliance Officer; a Compliance Manager; a Policy Manager; and a Policy Specialist. Page 16 Strategic Initiatives – 2014-2015 Strategy Milestones  ASH’s deemed status was restored after the ADHS Division of Licensing survey on 7/24/15 resulted in findings that ASH is in compliance with Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoPs).  The Joint Commission granted a decision of accreditation for ASH, effective October 2014 through October 2017.  ASH’s Plans of Correction, developed in accordance with CMS and ADHS Division of Licensing requirements, were approved; ASH’s Plans of Action, developed through a self-assessment process (Focused Standard Assessment), were reviewed and approved by the Joint Commission. Strategy 5 – Increase communication with  ASH has developed a new computer based internal and external customers. Incident Report system that will allow internal communication to improve by faster and more efficient report reviews. This will also improve the communication with external regulatory bodies that need this information to maintain compliance. Strategy 6 - Recruit and retain high quality  Over the past year, ASH has held 3 job fairs employees by improving processes, training, on campus that produced 22 staff. and increasing internships. Promoting Quality Care ASH has undergone major renovations this past year in an effort to focus on quality care for the patients. The goal of this transformation is to focus on patient needs while creating an environment of quality and transparency that promotes a positive culture throughout ASH. These changes will also promote established goals to recruit and retain talented staff, increase productivity by leveraging technology, improve communication and cultivate collaboration and creativity throughout the organization. ASH has overhauled some major processes and continues to focus on Recovery based treatment:  Further revising the roles and responsibilities of Campus Support and Safety to focus on ensuring a safe environment for staff, patients and visitors alike. Campus Support Staff are no longer the first responders during patient behavioral episodes, but will have ‘rovers’ that will help the direct care staff manage behavioral episodes. Page 17  Continuing to Improve the Patient and Family Experience by implementing a process that includes patient voice, choice and self-advocacy, and promoting healing and trusting relationships. Family members provide feedback on services and are provided with education on specific topics related to mental health. Patients are members of certain ASH committees including Human Rights Committee (HRC) and patient focused forums that hospital administration attends to hear concerns and suggestions from the patients.  Implemented a new response for patients experiencing a behavioral crisis called NonViolent Crisis Intervention (NVCI) developed by the Crisis Prevention Institute (CPI). All direct care staff are trained and continue to participate in monthly drills and annual retraining. The goal of NVCI is to intervene early before a situation becomes critical. It also addresses how staff can deal with their own stress, anxieties, and emotions when confronted with challenging situations.  Continuing to improve the program by utilizing a nursing staffing acuity and effectiveness plan that provides a process for nursing staff to adjust staffing based upon the behavior of individual patients.  Expanded programming for patients including development of a new activity/drop in center and new unit programing. More programming was added on nights and weekends and on units.  Focused on Recruitment, Retention and Training to reduce the amount of time between interviews and hire date and retain talent in the hospital. Commitment to Quality Care Quality care must be sustained on an ongoing basis. Quality requires analyzing what works and what could be done better on a daily basis. It also requires identifying areas for improvement. The Quality management department presents data to committees and leadership for discussion of findings and program improvement. ASH also collects data on a monthly basis for seclusion, restraint, “Code Gray,” assaults, self-harm and falls. The data is used to measure progress and identify quality improvement activities. Below is the summary data for fiscal year 2015: Civil Summary - FY15 Mon Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Seclusion Mechanical Restraint Physical Holds Code Gray Patient on Patient Assault Patient on Staff Assault Patient Self-Harm Falls Unwitnesse d Falls Witnessed 6 9 6 9 4 4 36 36 37 40 14 11 47 44 44 60 39 27 44 37 43 46 33 17 15 15 18 15 19 10 10 14 18 16 28 27 45 23 30 46 34 16 3 3 5 1 2 2 8 12 10 6 8 4 Page 18 Civil Summary - FY15 Mon Seclusion Mechanical Restraint Physical Holds Code Gray Patient on Patient Assault Patient on Staff Assault Patient Self-Harm Falls Unwitnesse d Falls Witnessed Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total 4 13 12 22 15 20 124 16 35 22 29 37 46 359 44 61 47 61 74 77 625 28 50 50 55 70 84 557 16 12 12 14 12 17 175 15 13 16 16 14 25 212 17 20 33 21 28 46 359 3 2 2 2 3 6 34 3 4 7 7 5 5 79 Forensic Summary - FY15 Mon Seclusion Mechanical Restraint Physical Holds Code Gray Patient on Patient Assault Patient on Staff Assault Patient Self-Harm Falls Unwitnesse d Falls Witnessed Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 2 8 4 7 0 28 0 2 6 4 1 1 3 2 4 4 5 0 32 2 4 9 11 11 2 5 3 13 6 7 3 76 4 15 14 10 7 3 5 12 16 9 15 4 114 3 7 5 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 0 1 29 0 0 1 4 2 1 2 1 3 0 2 0 16 3 12 5 5 1 1 2 4 3 1 4 0 41 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 14 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 11 Seclusion:  There were a total of 152 seclusion episodes with a total of 187 hours and 45 minutes.  For the Civil Hospital, there were 36 unique patients with a seclusion episode equating to 26.6% of the patients secluded.  For the Forensic Hospital, there were 9 unique patients with a seclusion episode equating to 5.9% of the patients secluded. Restraint:  There were a total of 1,092 restraint episodes, 701 physical holds and 391 mechanical restraints. This resulted in a total of 675 hours and 25 minutes for ASH; 579 hours and 22 minutes for Civil and 96 hours and 3 minutes for Forensic.  For the Civil Hospital, there were 63 unique patients with a restraint episode equating to 46.6% of the patients restrained. o Physical Hold Restraint: 63 unique patients, 46.6% o Mechanical Restraint 46 unique patients 34.1% Page 19   Physical and Mechanical Restraints combined had a total of 63 unique patients, which means that each unique patient accounted for under the Mechanical Restraints was also accounted for under the Physical Restraints. For the Forensic Hospital, there were 19 unique patients with a seclusion episode equating to 12.5% of the patients restrained. o Physical Hold Restraint: 18 unique patients, 11.8% o Mechanical Restraint 8 unique patients, 5.3% Physical Hold and Mechanical Restraints combined had a total of 19 unique patients, which means that each unique patient accounted for under the Mechanical Restraints was also accounted for under the Physical Hold Restraint analysis. ASH also compares its data with other Western Psychiatric State Hospitals (WPSHA). Regarding comparison to the WPSHA partners, ASH’s seclusion rate fared as follows: Per 1000 patient days, ASH has the 5th lowest rate of the WPSHA hospitals with 24 hospitals participating. Regarding comparison to the WPSHA partners, ASH’s restraint rate fared as follows:  Per 1000 patient days, ASH has the 11th lowest rate of the WPSHA hospitals with 24 hospitals participating. Page 20 Hospital Budget ASH’s budget for fiscal year 2015 is summarized below: ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2015 Funding Sources (General Operations Based on Budget Allocations): * Personal Services and Related Benefits - General Fund All Other Operating - General Fund/Az State Hosp Fund Restoration to Compentency - Az State Hosp Fund Rental Income Endowment Earnings Patient Benefit Fund Acptc Patient Benefit Fund Non-Title 36 Revenue Donations Emergency Preparedness AzSH Forensic Unit Debt Service ACPTC (Arizona Community Protection Treatment Center) Total Funding Expenditures: * Personal Services and Related Benefits Professional and Outside Services ** Travel (In-State) Travel (Out-of-State) Other Operating Capital Equipment Total Cost of Operations $38,291,621 $16,312,911 $900,000 $527,248 $650,000 $145,000 $20,000 $74,256 $30,000 $91,371 $3,111,700 $9,731,711 $69,885,818 $46,478,645 $11,846,922 $89,432 $4,821 $9,048,569 $69,850 $67,538,239 Collections : * ** Patient Care Collections to General Fund Patient Care Collections to Az State Hosp Fund - RTC Patient Care Collections to Az State Hosp Fund - Title XIX Patient Care Collections to Az State Hosp Fund - ACPTC Non-Patient Care Collection to General Fund $750,308 $975,636 $923,491 $2,838,374 $5,751 Total Collections $5,493,560 Through FYE June 30th Contract Physicians, Outside Hospitalization Costs, Outside Medical Services, and privitization of support services. Daily Costs by Treatment Program: AzSH Specialty Rehabilitation Psychosocial Rehabilitation Forensic - Restoration to Competency Forensic Rehabilitation Average $818 $659 $668 $672 $690 Rates became effective 1/01/15. ACPTC LRA 1-5 (Less Restrictive Alternative) LRA 6 LRA 6 Community Pre-Trial Treatment LOA (Leave of Absence for Medical Inpatient) $296 $434 $199 $295 $296 $442 Rates became effective 07/01/14. Page 21