Division of Behavioral Health Services Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs Fiscal Year 2015 Submitted Pursuant to A.R.S. §36-2023 Report Contents  Program Names and Locations  Client Demographics  Program Funding  Summary of Available Services  Service Utilization  Treatment Needs Addressed  Programmatic Initiatives  Treatment Outcomes  Goals for the Current Fiscal Year Report Highlights  94.6% of treatment recipients were adults  35.7% of treatment recipients were located within Maricopa County  9.3% of treatment recipients were referred to treatment by the criminal justice system  32.8% of all treatment recipients cited alcohol as their primary substance type; however, Marijuana was the primary substance abused by 79.7% of children/adolescents in treatment  29.3% of treatment recipients had a co-occurring Serious Mental Illness December 31, 2015 Introduc on The Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Behavioral Health Services (ADHS/DBHS) has conducted an assessment of its substance abuse treatment programs in accordance with the requisites outlined in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S) §36-2023(C)(6). This report includes information related to service types and geographic locations, funding sources and expenditures, numbers of clients served with their corresponding demographic information, substance use patterns and encounters for utilized services. A review of treatment outcomes, including changes in employment, educational participation, criminal activity, homelessness, and substance use is also included, along with programmatic goals for the current fiscal year. Name and Loca on of Each Program ADHS/DBHS serves as the Single State Authority on substance abuse, providing oversight, coordination, planning, administration, regulation and monitoring of all facets of the public behavioral health system in Arizona. Four Regional Behavioral Health Authorities (RBHAs), and three Tribal Regional Behavioral Health Authorities (TRBHAs), are contracted to operate as managed care organizations in six distinct geographic service areas (GSAs) throughout the State (see map). The T/RBHAs are required to maintain a comprehensive network of behavioral health providers to deliver prevention, intervention, treatment and rehabilitative services to individuals enrolled in the public behavioral health system. This structure allows communities to provide services in a manner appropriate to meet the unique needs of individuals and families residing within their local areas. Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Behavioral Health Services 150 N 18th Avenue, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85007 1 Enrollment and Demographics Table 1: FY 2015 Enrollment Distribution Counties Tribal / Regional Behavioral Health Authority (Geographic Service Area) No. of Enrolled and Percentage of Statewide Served Substance Substance Abuse Abuse Clients Population Apache Coconino Mohave Navajo Yavapai Northern Arizona Regional Behavioral Health Authority (NARBHA - GSA 1) 9,980 18.9% La Paz Yuma Cenpatico Behavioral Health of Arizona (GSA 2) 2,249 4.3% Cochise Graham Greenlee Santa Cruz Cenpatico Behavioral Health of Arizona (GSA 3) 2,067 3.9% Gila Pinal Cenpatico Behavioral Health of Arizona (GSA 4) 3,590 6.8% Pima Community Partnership of Southern Arizona (CPSA - GSA 5) 15,449 29.2% Maricopa Mercy Maricopa Integrated Care (MMIC - GSA 6) 18,855 35.7% TRBHA: Gila River Indian Community 325 0.6% TRBHA: Pascua Yaqui Tribe 90 0.2% TRBHA: White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona 25 0.0% IGA: Navajo Nation 191 0.4% Enrolled and Served Demographics Enrolled and Served in Arizona’s public behavioral health system and received at least one substance abuse service. Of Division policy requires that all behavioral health enrollees, 35.7 percent were enrolled in GSA 6 clients undergo a clinical assessment, adminis- (Maricopa County). tered by a clinician at the provider level. Among the information gathered during this process are sever- Table 1 shows enrollment counts throughout the al identifiable factors, such as date of birth, race State’s various geographic service areas. and ethnicity, gender, financial status and reasons for seeking treatment. The following paragraphs Gender present this information for those clients with a Substance Use Disorder (SUD) enrolled and The overall behavioral health population is divided served in Arizona’s behavioral health system dur- nearly evenly between males and females; however, the substance abuse population is comprised of ing Fiscal Year 2015 (FY 2015). more men than women—53.3 percent versus 46.7 The sidebar on page 3 also details demographics percent, respectively. of those who were enrolled and received substance abuse treatment services in the Arizona Financial Status behavioral health system for FY 2015. ADHS/DBHS is responsible for providing treatment and rehabilitation services to those individuals who In FY 2015, there were 52,821 consumers enrolled qualify for Title XIX or Title XXI benefits—these 2 consumers are often referred to as being “AHCCCS eligible” because their services are funded through the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS); the State’s Medicaid Authority. In FY 2015, 90.8 percent of substance abuse treatment members were eligible for AHCCCS. Age multi-race backgrounds, and 0.8 percent whom were Asian or Pacific Islander. Statewide, 26.0 percent of participants identified themselves as Hispanic/Latino. Referral Source Substance abuse members enter the behavioral health system through a variety of means and ADHS/DBHS works with the T/RBHAs to reduce barriers and promote efficient access to care. In FY 2015, 52.8 percent of all substance abuse members were self-referrals, meaning they decided to enroll on their own, or upon the recommendation of friends or family. External behavioral health providers referred 11.9 percent of members to the system, while 9.3 percent of individuals enrolled after involvement with the criminal justice system . Aggregate review of client age data indicates the vast majority of substance abuse treatment members in FY 2015 were adults, with those between the ages of 26 and 45 accounting for about half of all members (48.5 percent). Approximately 5.4 percent of substance abuse members were under the age of 18. The highest counts for age distribution occurred for the age group representing the 26 to 30 year olds (14.2 percent) and the 31 to 35 years Behavioral Health Category olds (13.7 percent). Co-occurring mental health issues such as depression, anxiety and psyRace and Ethnicity chotic disorders are commonly noted The majority (83.0 percent) of per- with substance abuse. In FY 2015, sons who were enrolled and served 19.5 percent of substance abuse for substance abuse treatment ser- clients had a co-occurring General vices in FY 2015 were white, 6.0 per- Mental Health Disorder (GMH), while cent were African American, and 6.8 29.3 percent also had a Serious percent were American Indian, fol- Mental Illness (SMI), in addition to a lowed by 1.2 percent whom were of substance use disorder. Percent of Served Population 12% 10.9% 9.7% 9.3% 10% 8% 5.4% 6% 9.4% 4% 2% 0% 9.7% 6.8% 6.0% Male: 53.3% Female: 46.7% Financial Eligibility Title XIX/XXI Non-Title XIX/XXI 90.8% 9.2% Age Distribution Birth - 5: 6-12 13-17 18-21 22-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 65+ Median Age 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 6.0% 9.3% 14.2% 13.7% 10.9% 9.7% 9.4% 9.7% 6.8% 2.9% 1.8% 38.3 Race and Ethnicity American Indian: Asian or Pacific Islander: African American: White: Multiracial: 6.0% 83.0% 1.2% Hispanic/Latino: 26.0% Self Referred: Other : Other Providers: Criminal Justice: Dept. of Economic Security: AHCCCS/PCP: 14.2% 13.7% 14% Gender 6.8% 0.8% Referral Source Figure 1— FY 2015 Substance Abuse Treatment Age Distribution 16% Substance Abuse SERVED Member Demographics (n=52,821) 2.9% 1.8% 52.8% 12.5% 11.9% 9.3% 5.0% 2.2% Community Agency: 1.6% Federal Agency: RBHA: Child Protective Services: Dept. of Education: 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% Behavioral Health Category 0.0% 0.0% Adult—Sub. Abuse Adult—SMI Adult—GMH Child/Adolescent Age Group 3 45.9% 29.3% 19.5% 5.4% Program Funding Table 2—Substance Abuse Treatment Funding Summary—FY 2015 Fund Source Dollar Amount Medicaid Funding (Title XIX & Proposition 204) Percentage $128,516,274 78.87% $23,913,267 14.68% State Appropriated $8,753,120 5.37% Intergovernmental Agreements: Maricopa County; City of Phoenix Local Alcohol Reception Center (LARC) $1,689,871 1.04% $66,725 0.04% $162,939,257 100.00% Federal: Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant (SAPT) Liquor Fees Total Funding: During fiscal year 2015, ADHS/DBHS expended $162,939,256 in service funding for individuals and families with substance abuse disorders. The single largest source of substance abuse treatment funding (78.87%) was Medicaid (TXIX & Proposition 204) as reflected in Table 2, followed by the Federal Substance Abuse Block Grant (SABG) (14.68%) (non-prevention monies). Additional funding included State appropriated monies, funds from Maricopa County for local detoxification services, the City of Phoenix IGA, and Liquor Services Fees. Available Services ADHS/DBHS maintains a comprehensive service delivery network providing primary prevention, treatment and rehabilitation programs to Children and Adolescents, as well as Adults with General Mental Health Disorders (GMH), Serious Mental Illnesses (SMI) and/or Substance Use Disorders (SA/SUD). sure the service delivery network presents individuals with a choice of multiple, highly-qualified providers, each offering varying levels of care spanning multiple treatment modalities. Generally speaking, services can be grouped into seven categories: Crisis, Support, Inpatient, Outpatient, Medical/Pharmacy, Residential and RehaWith respect to substance abuse treatment, ADHS/ bilitation. Table 3 (below) details the complete arDBHS works diligently with its contractors to en- ray of substance abuse services offered. Table 3: Service Array Service Category Description Treatment Services Individual and group counseling, therapy, assessment, evaluation, screening, and other professional services. Rehabilitation Services Living skills training, cognitive rehabilitation, health promotion, and ongoing support to maintain employment. Medical and Pharmacy Medications and medical procedures which relieve symptoms of addiction and/or promote or enhance recovery from addiction Support Services Case management, self-help/peer support services and transportation. Crisis Intervention Stabilization services provided in the community, hospitals and residential treatment facilities. Inpatient Services Inpatient detoxification and treatment services delivered in hospitals and sub-acute facilities, including Level I residential treatment centers that provide 24-hour supervision, an intensive treatment program, and on-site medical services. Residential Services Residential treatment with 24-hour supervision in Level II and III Facilities. Behavioral Health Day Programs Skills training and ongoing support to improve the individual’s ability to function within the community. Specialized outpatient substance abuse programs provided to a person, group of persons and/or families in a variety of settings. 4 Service Encounters The services listed in Table 3 (page 4) are available to Arizona’s public behavioral health members and are delivered based on need per each member’s individualized treatment plan. whereas Behavioral Health Day Programs encountered at the least percent (0.6%). Please note, the number members served in each category varied, as well as the cost of each service, therefore the percent does not necessarily reflect the most utilized service by the members. As indicated in Figure 2 (see below), Support Services encountered at the highest percent (29.6%), Figure 2— FY 2015 Percent Encountered by Service Category Statewide Substance Abuse Service Encounters, FY2015 35% 29.6% 30% Percent 25% 20% 15% 12.6% 10.0% 10.3% Medical Services Pharmacy 10% 5% 11.6% 11.5% 8.8% 4.9% 0.6% 0% Behavioral Health Day Programs Crisis Intervention Services Inpatient Services Rehabilitation Services Residential Support Services Treatment Services Services Service Category Treatment Needs Addressed by the Programs Alcohol remained the most common substance used by those in treatment in FY 2015; 32.8 percent of all members cited it as their primary substance, almost a 2 percent increase from FY 2014. As in past years, patterns in substance preference differed greatly between children/adolescents and adults. For example, 17.9 percent of adolescents receiving substance abuse treatment services cited marijuana as the primary substance used, compared to 19.5 percent of adults receiving substance abuse services. Table 4 - Primary Substance Type by Group Substance Type Child Adults All Clients Alcohol 13.4% 37.8% 32.8% Marijuana 79.7% 19.5% 22.7% Methamphetamine 2.5% 17.9% 17.1% Heroin/Morphine 1.4% 15.4% 14.7% Other Narcotics/Opiates 0.8% 6.8% 6.5% Cocaine/Crack 0.5% 4.1% 3.9% All Other Substances 1.5% 2.1% 2.1% Other Stimulants 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 5 This disparity between child/adolescents and adults is apparent when comparing substance preference by age group (see Figure 2). Marijuana was more commonly reported by children, adolescents and adults under age 25; alcohol continues to be more prevalent amongst adults over age 25. Figure 3—Primary Substance Type by Age Band—FY 2015 100% 90% Percent of Served Members 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6-12 13-17 18-21 22-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-64 65+ Age Group Alcohol Crack/ Cocaine Marijuana Heroin Methamphetamine Other Narcotics Other Stimulants Other Substances Treatment Outcomes and System Performance Table 5— FY2014 Outcomes How has participating in the behavioral health system impacted the lives of our clients? Outcomes Our Substance Abuse Clients: Percent 42.1% No Alcohol Use Change +21.0% No (Other) Drug Use 38.7% +24.1% Participate in Self-Help Programs During Treatment 1.5% +134.8% Are Not Homeless 93.4% +1.1% Are Competitively Employed Full or Part-Time 22.8% +6.1% Have No Recent Involvement with the Criminal Justice System 84.2% +1.3% The Division employs a variety of mechanisms to measure the effectiveness of treatment; including assessing the change in numerous functional outcome indicators for persons receiving behavioral health services. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has established a set of National Outcome Measures (NOMs) to capture an individual’s improvement in the areas of employment, educational participation, abstinence from alcohol or other drugs, criminal activity and homelessness. corresponding change in each of the outcome domains for those receiving treatment for a substance use disorder. For example, the number of clients reducing or abstaining from alcohol at discharge in FY2014 was 21 percent greater in relation to those abstaining from alcohol at admission. Participation in self-help programs during treatment at discharge was 134.8 percent greater than at admission. Although this was a large change, there was a small number of members participating in self-help programs at admission; this allowed for a Table 5 (above) shows the most recent status and very large relative change. 6 Programmatic Initiatives for Specific Populations In the following paragraphs, are highlights of programmatic initiatives in FY 2015 that focused on specific substance abuse populations: ing and support services, and an “Older Adult Behavioral Health” program that focuses on providing an array of services in-clinic. Pregnant and Parenting Women The protocol for pregnant females using drugs intravenously continues use in order to ensure medically assisted treatment medications are appropriately prescribed for this population. Collaboration also continues with Arizona’s Family First Program to provide substance use treatment services to parents who have involvement with the Department of Child Safety (DCS) due to abuse of substances. The Women’s Services Directory, which lists all treatment providers with treatment services and programs that are gender specific to women in Maricopa County, continues to assist providers and other entities in making appropriate treatment referrals. Youth The behavioral health system has been working to promote youth substance abuse prevention through stakeholder meetings, school and community-based trainings, public service announcements, media campaigns, and youth leadership programs. Provider treatment trainings have included components on how to screen for substance abuse in the adolescent population and the application of effective substance abuse treatment such as ACRA and other evidence-based practices targeting the adolescent population. Military, Veterans and Their Families Our RBHAs have been collaborating in various capacities, including participating in military-centered coalitions and councils, as well as collaborating on a Resource Navigator training. Additionally, Rally Point Tucson continues to help veterans and their families in Pima County navigate and access various resources. Providers throughout the state have been engaged in multiple trainings that are specific to the needs of service members, such as Trauma Informed Care, PTSD, Traumatic Brain injury, employment assistance, and resource navigation. Older Adults RBHAs continue to work with councils, providers, and community agencies to make appropriate referrals and monitor substance use diagnoses among the older adult population, as well as attend educational events. Providers have implemented programs tailored to the older adult population, such as a “Senior Peer” program that provides preventative services, resource connections, counsel- Goals for the Current Fiscal Year ADHS/DBHS will continue to enhance the quality of  Make data-driven decisions when planning for substance abuse service delivery, increase the use substance abuse prevention. of evidence-based practices in prevention and  Increase network of substance abuse prevention treatment, and improve clinical outcomes and the services providers. overall efficiency of substance abuse service utili-  Continue to track the availability and utilization of zation. Medically-Assisted Treatment (MAT) options through the increased use of Federal Grant The Adult and Children Systems of Care Plans funds. each have specific initiatives designed to promote  Increase outreach, engagement and enrollment and enhance the effectiveness of treatment, while of members of the military and their families. increasing outreach activities and encouraging  Promote the Arizona Prescription Drug Misuse more individuals to both seek out, and complete, and Abuse Initiative. treatment. These initiatives will be in place through  Promote education on the availability and effec2016 and include the following: tiveness of Peer and Family Support Services and self-help participation (AA, NA and CA).  Increase the utilization of Evidenced-Based Prac-  Continue to provide substance abuse and wrapatices (EBPs) in substance abuse prevention and round services for at risk populations through treatment. discretionary grants. Data Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Behavioral Health Services, Bureau of Business Information Systems. ARS §36-2023 (FY 2015); December 2015. 7