Maricopa County Department of Transportation MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES PLAN Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas Adopted April 18, 2001 Revised September 2004 Revised June 2011 Preface to 2011 Revision This version of the Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) revises the original plan and the 2004 revisions. Looking ahead to pending updates to the classification systems of towns and cities in Maricopa County, the original MSRP stipulated a periodic review and modification of the street functional classification portion of the plan. This revision incorporates the following changes: (1) as anticipated, many of the communities in the County have updated either their general or transportation plans in the time since the adoption of the first MSRP; (2) a new roadway classification, the Arizona Parkway, has been added to the Maricopa County street classification system and the expressway classification has been removed; and (3) a series of regional framework studies have been conducted by the Maricopa Association of Governments to establish comprehensive roadway networks in parts of the West Valley. Table of Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2. Functional Classification Categorization.............................................................................1 3. Geometric Design Standards..............................................................................................4 4. Street Classification Atlas..................................................................................................5 Roadway Cross-Section Schematics......................................................................................10 Map Index.............................................................................................................................13 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan 1. INTRODUCTION The Board of Supervisors adopted the latest edition of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) for Maricopa County on February 7, 2007. The TSP is the implementation component of the transportation element of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. Earlier editions of the TSP identified the need for a Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP). The MSRP is an important tool for planning future development along County roads. It insures adequate visibility and access, protects property values and the neighborhood character, and enhances the unique qualities of County areas. It also minimizes unnecessary costs and impact to property owners and the public as designated roadways are improved. The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Roadway Design Manual is the controlling document for all roadway specifications and requirements. Any references herein to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual are to the edition adopted November 3, 1993 and revised April 2004. It is currently available online at: http://www.mcdot. maricopa.gov/manuals/eng_manuals/roadDesign/ RoadwayCover_2004.pdf 2. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION CATEGORIZATION Functional classification is the process by which roads are grouped into classes according to the kind of service they provide. The basic functional classifications used in the MSRP are Arizona Parkway, Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, and Minor Collector. Local Streets are included for reference only and are not part of the MSRP. Using national classification criteria, these MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan systems are classified based on the trips served and the operational characteristics of the streets or highways. Distinctions are made between rural and urban classifications, as discussed below and illustrated in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12. For more detailed information please see the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual. Level of Service and Roadway Classifications Definitions of the desired Level of Service (LOS) designations for each roadway section referenced in the roadway function classifications is as follows: A: Free flow, with low volumes and high speeds B: Reasonably free flow, speeds beginning to be restricted by traffic conditions C: Stable flow zone, most drivers restricted in freedom to select their own speed D: Approaching unstable flow, drivers have little freedom to maneuver E: Unstable flow, may be short stoppages F: Forced or breakdown flow Table 2.1: Urban and Rural Roadway Planning Level Traffic Volumes in Chapter 2 of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual provides general ranges of traffic volumes that can be expected for various roadway types. Please consult the latest edition of the Roadway Design Manual for current traffic volumes. Also, please note that volumes shown in the above mentioned Table 2.1 are not used to determine roadway classifications in the MSRP. Roadway classifications are determined primarily by definition and supported by traffic analysis indicating the desired LOS. Page 1 2. Functional Classification Categorization Rural Principal Arterial A rural principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • • Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for substantial statewide travel Traffic movements between urban areas with populations over 25,000 Traffic movements at high speeds Divided four-lane roads Desired LOS C Rural Minor Arterial A rural minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • • • Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for integrated interstate or inter-county service Traffic movements between urban areas or other traffic generators with populations less than 25,000 Traffic movements at high speeds Undivided four-lane roads Striped for one or two lanes in each direction with auxiliary lanes at intersections as required by traffic volumes Desired LOS C Rural Major Collector A rural major collector road includes the following service characteristics: • • • Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for inter-county service Traffic movements between traffic generators, between traffic generators and larger cities, and between traffic generators and routes of a higher classification Traffic movements subject to a low level of side friction MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan • • • • Development may front directly on the road Controlled intersection spacing of 2 miles or greater Striped for one lane in each direction with a continuous left turn lane Desired LOS C Rural Minor Collector A rural minor collector road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • • • Traffic movements between local roads and collector roads Traffic movements between smaller communities and developed areas Traffic movements between locally important traffic generators within their remote regions Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade, and designed to take a minimum interference of traffic from driveways appropriate to a rural setting Striped for one lane in each direction Desired LOS B Rural Local Road A rural local road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade Traffic movements between collectors and adjacent lands Traffic movements involving relatively short distances Desired LOS A Urban Principal Arterial An urban principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics: • Traffic movements in urban areas consisting Page 2 2. Functional Classification Categorization • • • • • of through movements and major circulation movements in these areas Traffic movements involving a large portion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of mileage Posted speeds less than or equal to 45 mph Divided four-lane or six-lane roads Striped for two or three lanes in each direction with a median and exclusive turn lanes where applicable Desired LOS D Urban Minor Arterial An urban minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • • • Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of major circulation movements within these areas, with more emphasis on land access than major roads Traffic movements do not penetrate residential neighborhoods Traffic movements at moderate speeds with partially controlled access facilities Undivided four-lane with intersections at grade Striped for two lanes in each direction with a center left turn lane Desired LOS C Urban Major and Minor Collector Urban major and minor collector roads include the following service characteristics: • • • • • Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of both land access service and traffic circulation Traffic movements subject to high levels of median and side friction Traffic movements penetrate local areas Development may front directly on the road Has more than 10 uncontrolled access points per mile on one side MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan • • • • • Local areas include residential neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial areas Traffic capacity for an urban major collector road is limited not by the typical capacity of the road section, but instead by the desirability of maintaining acceptable traffic levels by the use of continuous center left turn lanes rather than intermittent left-turn lanes An urban minor collector road maintains acceptable traffic levels that will not affect residential neighborhoods adversely Urban “major” or “minor” classifications shall be made at MCDOT’s discretion Desired LOS C (major collector) and LOS B (minor collector) Urban Local Road An urban local road includes the following service characteristics: • • • • Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade with frequent driveway access Traffic movements between adjacent lands and collectors or other roads of higher classification Traffic movements over relatively short distances, less than 8 blocks long in most cases Desired LOS A Arizona Parkway An Arizona Parkway includes the following service characteristics: • • • • • • Divided roadway with access to abutting land generally limited to right in – right out Higher vehicle capacity Faster travel times Better gas mileage due to fewer stops and less idling at intersections Less potential for accidents at intersections due to elimination of left turns Grade separated intersections or at-grade, Page 3 3. Geometric Design Standards • signalized intersections no less than one mile apart Typically four or more lanes in width constructed on 200 feet of right-of-way Special Circumstances Classification There are road classifications used by cities and occasionally in Maricopa County that do not fit conveniently in any of the functional classifications defined in the MSRP. These special roads either do not occur often enough to warrant their own classification or they combine characteristics in such a way that they cannot be classified as a typical parkway, arterial, collector, or local street. In these instances, the County Engineer, or his or her designee, will make the decision as to when and where these cross-sections will be applied. This can be based on approved general plans, capacity requirements, or other circumstances requiring an alternative cross-section. These special circumstances may require additional right-of-way, number of lanes, urban or rural designation, or other unique design requirements. 3. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS The previous section presented the functional classifications used by Maricopa County to classify County streets. Presented in this section are the general geometric design standards associated with each classification. The latest edition of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual should be consulted for specific design guidance. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Roadway Cross-Sections The typical urban roadway width, right-of-way requirements, and number of lanes are provided in Table 1 (in feet). The cross-sections for parkway, principal arterial, minor arterial, major collector, minor collector, and local street classifications are shown graphically in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12. Table 1. Typical Urban Roadway Cross-Sections Classification Arizona Parkway Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Street Width (feet) 162 101 73 49 40 31 ROW Number Width of Lanes (feet) (typical) 200 6 130* 6 130 5 80 3 60 2 50 2 *Rural Principal Arterial requires 150 feet of right-of-way. It is generally anticipated that right-of way will be preserved as follows: 130’ for section line roadways; 80’ for mid-section line roadways; and 60’ for quarter-section line roadways. Bicycle Lanes Bicycle lanes are included in the standard crosssections for all principal arterial, minor arterial, and major collector streets. Bicycles are accommodated on minor collector and local streets with wide outside lanes, possibly sharing a parking lane. For an Arizona Parkway, a shoulder is recommended to accommodate bicycles. Curb opening catch basins should be used rather than grated inlets due to the potential for bicycles adjacent to the gutter pan. The minimum bicycle lane width on an urban street with curb-and-gutter shall be four feet, measured from the edge of the vehicle lane to the edge of the Page 4 4. Street Classification Atlas gutter pan. The minimum bicycle lane width on noncurbed rural streets shall be five feet. Pedestrians A five foot (minimum) sidewalk is required for all urban cross-sections, except the Arizona Parkway. For an Arizona Parkway in urban areas, a six foot (minimum) sidewalk is recommended to accommodate pedestrians. Bus Pullouts Right-of-way for bus pullouts and shelters should be preserved at all intersections of all principal arterial/ principal arterial, principal arterial/minor arterial, and minor arterial/minor arterial intersections. See the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction for details. Access Management Access management is defined as the regulation of vehicular access to public roadways from adjoining property. This is provided through legal, administrative, and technical strategies available to a political jurisdiction under its police powers in order to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the jurisdiction’s residents. Access management regulates the level of access control on roadways and is needed to help retain the capacity of public highways, maintain public safety, and retain access to private land. Typically, access management decisions are made during a corridor study or design of roadway improvements. AZTech™ AZTech™ is partnership between MCDOT, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), MAG, and cities and towns in the Phoenix metropolitan area that brings together decision makers and practitioners with a consensus-based MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan approach to integrating and operating a multimodal regional transportation system. Through the application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technology, AZTech™ fosters integration of local traffic management and traveler information services on a cross-jurisdictional, regional basis to promote seamless transportation service for the traveling public. AZTech™ began in 1996, on the strength of a model demonstration grant won by MCDOT and ADOT. The award’s objective was to exhibit the strengths and benefits of ITS and regional cooperation in both traffic management and the distribution of traveler information. After successfully completing the initial award, AZTech™ continues today as a voluntary, thriving, beneficial partnership for the region. The partnership provides many benefits for both travelers and traffic managers. For the traveling public, the AZTech™ program delivers traffic coordination, traffic information and incident management from a regional perspective. Methods include motorist message signs, coordinated traffic signals, travel time information via phone and website, and incident and congestion information relayed through television and radio. For the professional traffic manager, AZTech™ has been able to integrate the many individual local and state government management systems into a regional system of traffic monitoring and control. Project specific decisions are made during roadway improvement design. 4. STREET CLASSIFICATION ATLAS This section includes the functional classification maps that designate the future classification for the Arizona Parkways, arterial roadways, and collector roadways portion of the 2,478 miles of roads that Page 5 4. Street Classification Atlas are in the Maricopa County Road Inventory System. The following are assumptions and guidelines that were utilized in coding these maps. Please note that no distinction is made between rural and urban classifications. Primary Purpose • • • • • • Town of Fountain Hills General Plan (2010) Town of Gila Bend General Plan Update (2006) Town of Gilbert General Plan (2010) City of Glendale Transportation Plan (2009) City of Goodyear General Plan (2010) City of Litchfield Park General Plan Update (2010) City of Mesa Transportation Plan (2002) Town of Paradise Valley General Plan (2003) City of Peoria General Plan (2010) City of Phoenix Street Classification Map (2010) Town of Queen Creek General Plan Update (2008) City of Scottsdale Street Classification Map (2008) City of Surprise General Plan (2010) City of Tempe General Plan (2003) City of Tolleson General Plan (2005) Town of Youngtown General Plan (2003) The primary purpose of the MSRP is to identify future roadway classifications for county roads. Identification of roadway classifications for roadways within cities or towns is included for the purpose of showing continuity with county roadways. Generally the classification for the county roadway is matched to the adjacent city or town roadway. A primary objective is to facilitate rightof-way preservation for future roadways. However, assignment of a roadway to a particular functional classification is not a guarantee that roadway improvements will be constructed in the future. • • • • • Municipal Functional Classification Resources Municipal functional classification designations, as they relate to the county’s categorization, are summarized in Table 2. A roadway’s classification is identified as shown on the most recently updated and adopted/accepted planning document. In many cases this is a municipality’s general plan. In other cases, it might constitute a regional transportation framework study. The municipal functional classification documents referenced include: • • • • • • City of Avondale General Plan Update (2002) Town of Buckeye Transportation Master Plan (Draft, 2010) Town of Carefree General Plan (2002) Town of Cave Creek General Plan (2005) City of Chandler Transportation Master Plan Update (2010) City of El Mirage – staff designation (2010) MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan • • • • • The Town of Guadalupe is not included in this list because it does not have a functional classification map. The arterials within Guadalupe are included in the City of Tempe’s General Plan. The Town of Wickenburg is not included in this list because its 2003 General Plan illustrates only existing and future roadways, not roadway classifications. The MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010) is used instead, as cited in Table 2 and confirmed by municipal staff. The City of El Mirage is included in the list, but not in the table, as no functional classification map yet exists for the city; however, city staff clarified intended classification categories for the purpose of this publication. Page 6 4. Street Classification Atlas Table 2. County/Municipal Functional Classification System Comparison Jurisdiction MCDOT Functional Classification Categories Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Avondale Buckeye Carefree Cave Creek Chandler Fountain Hills Arterial; RRS Arterial Arterial Principal Arterial Major Arterial Principal Arterial Major Collector N/A N/A N/A Minor Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A Collector Major Collector N/A Major Collector Gila Bend Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector N/A N/A Minor Collector Minor Collector N/A Limited Collector; Minor Collector N/A Gilbert Major Arterial; RRS Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Glendale Major Arterial; Superstreet Scenic Arterial; Major Arterial; Arterial Arterial Arterial Collector N/A Goodyear City Center Arterial N/A N/A N/A Collector N/A Arterial (6 lanes); Parkway Major Arterial Arterial (4 lanes) N/A N/A N/A Minor Arterial Collector Minor Arterial Major Collector Collector Phoenix Principal Arterial; Major Arterial Major Arterial Arterial Collector Minor Collector Queen Creek Principal Arterial Arterial Collector N/A Scottsdale Major Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Surprise Major Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A Tempe Arterial N/A N/A N/A Tolleson Major Street N/A N/A N/A Youngtown Arterial; RRS N/A Major Collector N/A Litchfield Park Mesa Paradise Valley Peoria MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Page 7 4. Street Classification Atlas Municipal functional classifications are assigned according to the best match of the county’s functional classification system. For example, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as a six-lane roadway with 130 feet of right-of-way, it is depicted as a principal arterial roadway, as it best matches this classification within the county’s system. However, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as having 80 feet of right-of-way and only two lanes, it would most closely match the county’s major collector category. Framework Studies The framework studies referenced include: • • • • MAG I-10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (September 2007) MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study (October 2009) ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010) MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study Wickenburg Area (November 2010) MCDOT Corridor Studies The MSRP incorporates the recommended roadway alignments identified in Corridor Feasibility Studies and Corridor Improvement Studies conducted by MCDOT. A summary of these studies can be found on the MCDOT website (http://www.mcdot. maricopa.gov). Roadway Names Roadway names are identified as shown on municipal general plans, transportation master plans, and/or regional transportation framework studies. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Functional Classification Distinctions Many local jurisdictions do not distinguish between major and minor arterials or between major and minor collectors in their transportation plans. These include: • • • • • • • • • • • City of Avondale Town of Buckeye Town of Carefree Town of Cave Creek City of El Mirage City of Glendale City of Litchfield Park City of Peoria City of Tempe City of Tolleson Town of Youngtown In order to preserve the maximum required right-ofway, roadways in these jurisdictions are classified as major arterials and major collectors. It should also be noted that many local jurisdictions do not distinguish between current and future roadways in their transportation plans, as the plan is a snapshot of the intended roadway network. Thus, roadways illustrated as future in the street classification maps are: (1) specifically classified as “future” in the municipal transportation plan or framework study, (2) illustrated in a transportation plan, but non-existent in the Streetnet file (comprehensive county roadway network compilation updated on a weekly basis), thus implying that they do not exist today, or (3) classified as future in the county RoadRunner file (inventory of roadways and their classifications in non-incorporated areas). Page 8 4. Street Classification Atlas Major and Minor Collectors Indian Community Roadways All collectors in the unincorporated areas are shown. However, only collectors in incorporated areas that complete the grid on the periphery of cities and towns or provide connectivity between major and minor arterials are shown. Roadway corridors within an Indian Community are illustrated as “other” to provide regional connectivity context. Those roadways that are maintained by the county, however, due to their regional significance, are classified per the RoadRunner file. Municipal Planning Areas (MPA) Roadways planned in unincorporated areas as part of a town or city MPA are classified according to the municipal network functional categorization, as opposed to the county’s, as the roadway will likely ultimately be built and maintained by the town or city jurisdiction. Shared Roadways Similarly, when a roadway is shared by a city or town and the county (north-south or east-west side divisions), ownership is categorized as a county roadway, however classified according to the town or city’s functional classification plan. Adjacent Counties Roadways in adjacent counties are simply depicted with a solid line representing existing, and dashed line for future; however, no functional classification designations are assigned. Roadway network information for adjacent counties was pulled from a variety of sources, including: • • High Capacity Roadways Maricopa County does not own or operate any freeways or expressways. High capacity and access controlled roadways (metropolitan state routes/ freeways) are depicted separate from the local roadway system to provide regional context. They are categorized in three ways: Existing; Planned (e.g., adopted alignment, funding available for some degree of improvement over existing conditions); or Proposed (e.g., accepted corridor, no funding for improvements, preliminary design only). U.S. highways and state routes that are limited access and/or rural in nature are depicted as “Highways.” U.S. highways and state routes that traverse incorporated areas and function as part of the local roadway network (e.g., principal arterial) are classified according to each jurisdiction’s functional classification plan. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan • • • • • • • ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010), which includes principal arterial and higher network information statewide MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010), which includes some network information for Yavapai County La Paz County Comprehensive Plan (2010) Yuma County Comprehensive Plan (2010) Pima County 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (2010) Pinal County Comprehensive Plan (2009) Yavapai County Road Centerlines and Routes GIS shapefile (2010) MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study (October 2009), which includes the Pinal County Regionally Significant Routes for Safety and Mobility network Yavapai County Comprehensive Plan (2003) Page 9 Roadway Cross-Sections Figure 1. Parkway Cross-Section Figure 2. Urban Principal Arterial Cross-Section Figure 3. Rural Principal Arterial Cross-Section MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Page 10 Roadway Cross-Sections Figure 4. Urban Minor Arterial Cross-Section Figure 5. Rural Minor Arterial Cross-Section Figure 6. Urban Major Collector Cross-Section MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Page 11 Roadway Cross-Sections Figure 7. Rural Major Collector Cross-Section Figure 8. Urban Minor Collector Cross-Section Figure 9. Rural Minor Collector Cross-Section MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Page 12 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan 1 2 6 7 12 13 17 18 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 3 8 14 Map Index 4 5 9 10 15 11 16 19 Page 13 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Municipalities Index Wickenburg 1 2 3 4 5 Cave Creek Carefree Peoria Scottsdale 6 7 Surprise El Mirage Buckeye 8 Youngtown Glendale Fountain Hills Paradise Valley Litchfield Phoenix Tolleson Park Avondale Goodyear 9 Tempe 13 14 11 Mesa Gilbert Guadalupe Chandler 12 10 15 Queen Creek 16 Gila Bend 17 18 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 19 Page 14 Map 1 LA PAZ COUNTY YAVAPAI COUNTY MARICOPA COUNTY Cherokee Ln R BNSF ailwa y Eagle Eye Parkway W. Wickenburg Way Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Area ila Rd MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Other Roadway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Twin Peaks Rd Ag u W. Caballeros Rd Black Mountain Pkwy Eagle Eye Rd Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Forepaug h Peak Rd Tres Alamos Wilderness Area 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 17 18 19 5 10 11 15 16 Page 15 Map 2 y wa BN SF Ra il o Cher L kee n Constellation Park ure Mi ne Rd YAVA PAI C O UN MAR TY ICOP A CO U NT Y Vu lt W. Caballeros Rd m Hassaya pa Frwy W. Wickenburg Way Sp Lake P BN SF R ai l wa y MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan R gs d leasa nt Frw y 211th Ave Black Mountain Rd t Ho tle ri n Wild Rose Pkwy S Turner Pkwy R7 on nsi xte E 4 Hidden Waters Pkwy Joy Ranch Pkwy Vulture Mine Rd Twin Peaks Rd s Ca Black Mountain Pkwy Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Hassayampa River Canyon Wilderness Area Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 17 18 19 5 10 11 15 16 Page 16 Map 3 Hell's Canyon Wilderness Area YAVA PAI C O UN MAR TY ICOP A CO U NT Y nt Frw rR ive Honda Bow Rd Anthem Way Ne wR Castle Hot Sp leasa Jenny Lin Rd d rings Rd Lake Pleasant Regional Park Desert Hills Dr Joy Ranch Rd y 163rd Ave Jackrabbit Tr Lake P 211th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Prescott National Forest Cloud Rd Carefree Hwy MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Other Roadway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 17 18 19 5 10 11 15 16 Page 17 Map 4 GILA COUNTY YAVAPAI C O UN New River TY COUNTY Tonto National Forest Seven Springs Rd MARICOPA Rd Circle Mountain Rd Honda Bow Rd 136th St Pima Rd 32nd St 24th St 16th St 7th St Tom Darlington Dr Cave Creek Regional Park Joy Ranch Rd School House Rd Desert Hills Dr Cave Creek Rd Bartlett Dam Rd 7th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan YAVAPAI COUNTY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 18 Map 5 GILA COUNTY YAVAPAI COUNTY MARICOPA COUNTY Tonto National Forest Bartle tt Da m O A C UN T Y M GIL A RICOPA CO U Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan YAVAPAI COUNTY Rd N TY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Other Roadway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 19 Map 6 Dove Valley Rd d Hummingbird Springs Wilderness Area Eagle Eye Rd LA PAZ COUNTY Big Horn Mountains Wilderness Area Sa lom eH CAP C wy ana Olive Ave l Northern Pkwy Glendale Ave Camelback Pkwy Indian School Rd Thomas Rd Centennial Rd Courthouse Rd McDowell Rd Van Buren St Yuma Rd Lower Buckeye Rd 483rd Ave 491st Ave 499th Ave Broadway Rd 507th Ave 523rd Ave 531st Ave 539th Ave Eagletail Mountains Wilderness Area Harquahala Valley Rd Buckeye Rd 547th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan MARICOPA COUNTY Agu ila R Southern Ave Baseline Rd Tonopah Pkwy MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 20 Wild Rose Pkwy Has say am Vult ure M ine Rd pa F r wy Map 7 BN SF R ai lw Dove Valley Rd ay Lone Mountain Rd Dixileta Dr Patton Rd White Tanks Frwy Jomax Rd Pinnacle Peak Rd Deer Valley Rd Sun Valley Pkwy Wickenburg CAP Canal Greenway Rd White Tank Mountain Regional Park Wintersburg Pkwy Olive Ave Hidden Waters Pkwy Northern Pkwy Glendale Ave Sun Valley Pkwy Bethany Home Rd Camelback Pkwy Turner Pkwy Hassayampa Frwy Tonopah Pkwy Cactus Rd Peoria Ave Indian School Rd Thomas Rd McDowell Rd Van Buren St Yuma Rd Broadway Rd Rainbow Rd Watson Rd Apache Rd Miller Rd Rooks Rd Turner Rd RID Canal Wilson Rd Palo Verde Rd Bruner Rd Johnson Rd 315th Ave 323rd Ave 331st Ave 339th Ave 347th Ave 355th Ave 363rd Ave 371st Ave Wintersburg Rd 387th Ave 395th Ave Tonopah Rd Lower Buckeye Rd 411th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Rd Bell Rd MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Southern Ave MC-85 Other Roadway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 21 Pkwy asant Lone Mountain Rd Dixileta Dr n CAP Ca Lake P le Map 8 Dove Valley Rd al Patton Rd Jomax Rd Happy Valley Rd Pinnacle Peak Rd Adobe Dam Regional Park Deer Valley Rd Beardsley Rd Union Hills Dr White Tank Mountain Regional Park ai Greenway Rd lw ay Thunderbird/Waddell Rd Ar izo n Cactus Rd aC an Peoria Ave al Dunlap/Olive Ave Beardsley Canal Northern Ave Glendale Ave Bethany Home Rd Camelback Rd Indian School Rd Thomas Rd Grand Canal McDowell Rd Union Pacific Railroad Yuma/Buckeye Rd 27th Ave 35th Ave 43rd Ave 51st Ave 59th Ave 30 67th Ave 75th Ave 83rd Ave 91st Ave 99th Ave Broadway Rd 107th Ave Avondale Blvd El Mirage Rd Dysart Rd Litchfield Rd Lower Buckeye Rd Bullard Ave Sarival Rd Cotton Ln Citrus Rd l Perryville Rd Jackrabbit Tr Airport Rd a Can RID Estrella Pkwy/Reems Rd Van Buren St Dean Rd Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Bell Rd BN SF R MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Southern Ave Baseline Rd Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 22 Stagecoach Pass 176th St 160th St 152nd St Lone Mountain Rd 144th St Sonoran Blvd 168th St Tonto National Forest Carefree Hwy 136th St Map 9 Cloud Rd Dixileta Dr Rio Verde Dr ek Rd Black Mountain Blvd Dynamite Blvd Cre Jomax Rd McD owell M Beardsley Rd McDowell Mountain Regional Park Union Hills Dr Bell Rd 104th St 96th St Pima Rd Hayden Rd Scottsdale Rd Peoria Ave 64th St Cactus Rd 56th St Tatum Blvd Thunderbird/Waddell Rd Shea Blvd CA P Dunlap/Olive Ave Ca na l Northern Ave Phoenix Mountains Preserve Glendale Ave Bethany Home Rd Ar izo n Camelback Rd aC an al Tonto N.F. Indian School Rd Thomas Rd Thomas Rd McDowell Rd McDowell Rd Papago Park McKellips Rd Brown Rd Union Pacific Railroad Broadway Rd Higley Rd Greenfield Rd Val Vista Dr Lindsay Rd Gilbert Rd Stapley Rd Mesa Dr Country Club Dr Alma School Rd Dobson Rd Price Rd McClintock Dr Rural Rd Kyrene Rd Priest Dr 48th St 40th St 32nd St 24th St 16th St 7th St 7th Ave 19th Ave University Dr 27th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Greenway Rd ay Deer Valley Rd Mustang W Pinnacle Peak Rd ountain Rd Cav e Happy Valley Rd MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Baseline Rd Other Roadway Minor Arterial NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. Southern Ave 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 23 Map 10 BIA 51 Mustang W ay M G AR ILA C IC OP OU N A CO T Y UN TY c D o w e ll R d Tonto National Forest Hw Bush y tM ss Rd r Fo y Pa Thomas Rd MARICOPA COUNTY User McDowell Rd McKellips PINAL COUNTY Brown Rd Mountain View Rd Goldfield Rd Tomahawk Rd Idaho Rd Ironwood Dr Meridian Rd Baseline Rd Crismon Rd Southern Ave Ellsworth Rd Broadway Rd Signal Butte Rd University Dr Hawes Rd Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan McD owell M ountain Rd Rio Verde Dr MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 24 Map 11 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Tonto National Forest A GIL NT Y PINAL COUNTY COU MARICOPA COUNTY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 25 Elliot Rd Tonopah Rd Dobbins Rd 411th Ave 477th Ave 491st Ave 507th Ave Harquahala Valley Rd 523rd Ave 531st Ave 539th Ave 547th Ave Map 12 Eagletail Mountains Wilderness Area Narramore Rd Ray Rd cif ic R ai lro ad YUMA COUNTY Signal Mountain Wilderness Area Woolsey Peak Wilderness Area Un i on Pa Lahman Rd Highline Rd Rhodes Ave Butterfield Stage Rd de Hy rR d Painted m ck Da Ro Oat ma n 571st Ave Rd Rd Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan MARICOPA COUNTY Willams Field Rd MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 26 fic 0 n Can Arlingto Rainbow Rd Watson Rd Apache Rd Miller Rd Rooks Rd Turner Rd Wilson Rd Palo Verde Rd Bruner Rd Johnson Rd 331st Ave d Ol o ad 8 US Hazen Rd Elliot Rd Narramore Rd al Ray Rd Williams Field Rd Hidden Waters Pkwy aci nP 351st Ave 355th Ave Wintersburg Rd Tonopah Rd 411th Ave Map 13 o Uni lr R ai 30 Pecos Rd Buckeye Hills Regional Park Germann Rd Riggs Rd Patterson Rd rise Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan rp Ente Sonoran Desert National Monument a Can l Woods Rd e nd Gila B Woolsey Peak Wilderness Area Canal Pierpoint Rd North Maricopa Mountains Wilderness Area pa Rd ailroad acific R P Union Stout Rd Powerline Rd Marico Gila Blvd Paloma Rd Watermelon Rd Citrus Valley Rd Fornes Rd MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 27 27th Ave 35th Ave 43rd Ave 51st Ave 59th Ave 67th Ave 75th Ave 83rd Ave 91st Ave 99th Ave 107th Ave 115th Ave 123rd Ave Dysart Rd Bullard Ave Litchfield Rd Pebble Creek Pkwy/Estrella Pkwy Sarival Rd Estrella Pkwy/Cotton Ln Citrus Rd/Rainbow Valley Rd Perryville Rd Jackrabbit Tr Airport Rd Map 14 Dobbins Rd Elliot Rd Narramore Rd Estrella Mountain Regional Park Ray Rd Williams Field Rd Pecos Rd Germann Rd Queen Creek Rd Ocotillo Rd Chandler Heights Rd Riggs Rd Hunt Rd rw Patterson Rd y So no ra n Va ll North Maricopa Mountains Wilderness Area ey Pk w y PINAL COUNTY aF Sierra Estrella Wilderness Area MARICOPA COUNTY mp Amaranth Blvd Sonoran Desert National Monument Kinney Rd Mahalia Rd Schumacher Rd 75th Ave za Farrell Rd 83rd Ave An de Ra 91st Ave y Wa nic e c S ic cif Pa 99th Ave n d 107th Ave io Un a ilro 115th Ave Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Ha ssa ya Ha s South Maricopa Mountains Wilderness Area sa ya m pa Fr wy MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 17 18 19 5 10 11 15 16 Page 28 Higley Rd Greenfield Rd Warner Rd ac ific Ra ilro Ray Rd ad Williams Field Rd lidat e pe Pecos Rd Cons o Tem Elliot Rd nP d Ca nal Un io Val Vista Dr Lindsay Rd Gilbert Rd Cooper Rd McQueen Rd Dobson Rd Price Rd McClintock Dr Rural Rd Alma School Rd Highli n Kyrene Ca nal Can al e C an al Kyrene Rd Priest Dr 48th St 40th St 32nd St 24th St 16th St 7th St 7th Ave 19th Ave Map 15 Phoenix South Mountain Park Guadalupe Rd Germann Rd rn C ana l Queen Creek Rd East e Ocotillo Rd ana l Chandler Heights Rd RW CD C Riggs Rd MARICOPA COUNTY Hunt Hwy PINAL COUNTY Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Hohokam Pima National Monument Murphy Rd Horseshoe Rd Sesame Rd Un io Nelson Rd Casa Blanca Rd nP ac ific Ra ilro ad Hassayampa Frwy MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 29 Goldfield Rd Idaho Rd Ironwood Dr Meridian Rd Tomahawk Rd Warner Rd Signal Butte Rd Elliot Rd Crismon Rd Ellsworth Rd Map 16 Guadalupe Rd Tonto N.F. Ray Rd Vineyard Rd Williams Field Rd Pecos Rd Germann Rd Queen Creek Rd Chandler Heights Rd Rit te nh ou se Riggs Rd ateway Frw y Schnepf Rd Williams G Ocotillo Rd Hunt Hwy 802 Rd MARICOPA COUNTY PINAL COUNTY io Un Skyline Dr Ar n izo ad i l ro ific ac Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan nP Ma a gm a aR Ra ilr oa d North-South Frwy y Hw nt Hu acific R P Union ren ce K elv in H wy Ra Union Pacific ilroad Flo ailroad MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 30 n Unio fic R Paci ailro ad la Gi n Be dC an al MARICOPA COUNTY YUMA COUNTY al i en te Rd Oat man Rd Map 17 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan aC Painted Rock Dam Rd Ag u MARICOPA COUNTY PIMA COUNTY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 31 Be n Citrus Valley Rd Paloma Rd la Gi Potatoe Rd Map 18 Railroad al an dC fic Union Paci Tucson, Cornelia, and Gila Bend Railroad Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Sonoran Desert National Monument MARICOPA COUNTY PIMA COUNTY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 32 Map 19 South Maricopa Mountains Wilderness Area Vekol Valley Rd Sonoran Desert National Monument PINAL COUNTY Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan MARICOPA COUNTY Table Top Wilderness Area MARICOPA COUNTY PIMA COUNTY MCDOT Classification Municipal Classification High Capacity Roadway Parkway Parkway Freeway Canal Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Planned Freeway Railroad Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Freeway Park Area Major Collector Major Collector Highway Minor Collector Minor Collector NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities. MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan Other Roadway 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 15 16 Page 33