2002 Periodic Emissions Inventory for Carbon Monoxide for the Maricopa County, Arizona, Nonattainment Area June 2004 This emissions inventory has been prepared by: Bob Downing Dena Konopka Matt Poppen Eric Raisanen Maricopa County Environmental Services Department 1001 N. Central Ave. Suite 250 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Ruey-in Chiou Steve Ochs Roger Roy Maricopa Association of Governments 302 N. 1st Ave. Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85003 with additional contributions and/or review by: Randy Sedlacek Peter Hyde Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1101 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Bob Farrell Pima County Air Quality Control District P.O. Box 987 Florence, AZ 85232 Alison K. Pollock Cuong Tran Christian Lindjhem ENVIRON International Corp. 101 Rowland Way Novato, CA 94945 2002 Ozone Periodic Emission Inventory i Maricopa County, AZ Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Overview............................................................................................................................ 1 Agencies responsible for the emissions inventory............................................................. 1 Temporal scope.................................................................................................................. 2 Geographic scope............................................................................................................... 2 Overview of local demographic and land-use data............................................................ 3 1.5.1 Demographic data ................................................................................................... 3 1.5.2 Land-use data .......................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Emissions overview by source category............................................................................ 4 1.6.1 Point sources ........................................................................................................... 4 1.6.2 Area sources............................................................................................................ 5 1.6.3 Nonroad mobile sources ......................................................................................... 5 1.6.4 Onroad mobile sources ........................................................................................... 6 1.6.5 Summary of emissions by source category............................................................. 6 1.7 References.......................................................................................................................... 8 2. Point Sources ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Introduction and scope....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Identification of CO point sources................................................................................... 10 2.3 Procedures for estimating emissions from point sources ................................................ 14 2.3.1 Example 1: Ocotillo Power Plant.......................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Example 2: Imsamet of Arizona ........................................................................... 15 2.4 Emission reduction credits............................................................................................... 18 2.5 CO point source emissions by process type .................................................................... 19 2.6 Summary of point source emissions ................................................................................ 23 2.7 Quality assurance / quality control procedures................................................................ 23 2.7.1 Emission survey preparation and data collection.................................................. 23 2.7.2 Submission processing.......................................................................................... 24 2.7.3 Analysis of annual point source emissions data for this inventory....................... 25 2.8 References........................................................................................................................ 25 3. Area Sources ........................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Scope and methodology................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Fuel combustion............................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Industrial natural gas............................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 Industrial fuel oil................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3 Commercial/institutional natural gas .................................................................... 31 3.2.4 Commercial/institutional fuel oil .......................................................................... 33 3.2.5 Residential natural gas .......................................................................................... 34 3.2.6 Residential wood combustion ............................................................................... 35 3.2.7 Residential fuel oil ................................................................................................ 37 3.2.8 Summary of all area-source fuel combustion ....................................................... 37 3.3 Industrial processes.......................................................................................................... 38 3.3.1 Chemical manufacturing....................................................................................... 38 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory i Maricopa County, AZ 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.3.2 Commercial cooking............................................................................................. 39 3.3.3 State-permitted portable sources........................................................................... 41 3.3.4 Industrial processes not elsewhere classified (NEC) ............................................ 42 3.3.5 Summary of all area-source industrial processes.................................................. 42 Waste treatment and disposal .......................................................................................... 43 3.4.1 On-site incineration............................................................................................... 43 3.4.2 Open burning ........................................................................................................ 43 3.4.3 Landfills ................................................................................................................ 46 3.4.4 Summary of all area-source waste treatment and disposal ................................... 47 Miscellaneous area sources.............................................................................................. 47 3.5.1 Other combustion.................................................................................................. 47 3.5.1.1 Wildfires and brush fires ......................................................................... 47 3.5.1.2 Structure fires........................................................................................... 49 3.5.1.3 Vehicle fires............................................................................................. 50 3.5.1.4 Engine testing .......................................................................................... 51 3.5.2 Health services: crematories ................................................................................. 51 3.5.3 Accidental releases................................................................................................ 52 3.5.4 Summary of all miscellaneous area sources ......................................................... 52 Summary of area source emissions.................................................................................. 53 Quality assurance / quality control procedures................................................................ 53 References........................................................................................................................ 55 4. Nonroad Mobile Sources........................................................................................................ 57 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 57 Agricultural equipment.................................................................................................... 59 Airport ground support equipment .................................................................................. 60 Commercial equipment.................................................................................................... 61 Construction and mining equipment................................................................................ 62 Industrial equipment ........................................................................................................ 62 Lawn and garden equipment............................................................................................ 63 Logging equipment.......................................................................................................... 64 Pleasure craft ................................................................................................................... 64 Railway maintenance equipment ..................................................................................... 65 Recreational equipment ................................................................................................... 66 Aircraft............................................................................................................................. 66 Locomotives .................................................................................................................... 70 Summary of all nonroad mobile source emissions .......................................................... 71 Quality assurance procedures .......................................................................................... 71 References........................................................................................................................ 71 5. Onroad Mobile Sources ......................................................................................................... 73 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 73 VMT estimation procedure.............................................................................................. 73 Speed estimation procedure............................................................................................. 76 Monthly VMT factors...................................................................................................... 77 Emission factor estimation procedure ............................................................................. 78 5.5.1 Emission factor model .......................................................................................... 78 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory ii Maricopa County, AZ 5.5.2 Development of model inputs............................................................................... 79 5.5.3 Model outputs ....................................................................................................... 83 5.5.4 Summary of emission factors................................................................................ 83 5.5.5 Emission estimates................................................................................................ 84 5.6 Summary of CO emissions from onroad mobile sources .............................................. 101 5.7 Quality assurance process.............................................................................................. 105 5.7.1 VMT estimates.................................................................................................... 105 5.7.2 Emission factor estimates ................................................................................... 105 5.7.3 Quality review of 2002 periodic CO emissions inventory.................................. 105 5.8 References...................................................................................................................... 106 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory iii Maricopa County, AZ List of Tables Table 1.2–1. Table 1.5–1. Table 1.5–2. Table 1.6–1. Table 1.6–2. Table 1.6–3. Chapter authors and QA/QC contacts....................................................................... 1 Demographic profile of Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area............. 3 Land-use categories used to apportion emissions..................................................... 4 Summary of annual and season-day point source emissions, by source category.... 4 Summary of annual and season-day area source emissions, by source category. .... 5 Summary of annual and season-day CO emissions from nonroad mobile sources...................................................................................................................... 6 Table 1.6–4. Annual and season-day emissions from onroad mobile sources in Maricopa County. ..................................................................................................................... 6 Table 1.6–5. Summary of annual CO emissions (tons/yr) in the CO nonattainment area, by source category, 1990–2002. ................................................................................... 8 Table 1.6–6. Summary of CO season-day emissions (lbs/day) in the CO nonattainment area, by source category, 1990–2002................................................................................ 8 Table 2.2–1. Number of stationary point sources by location and permitting authority............. 10 Table 2.2–2. Name and location of all point sources. ................................................................. 10 Table 2.3–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by facility. ........................... 16 Table 2.4–1. CO emission reduction credits. .............................................................................. 18 Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type. .................. 19 Table 2.6–1. Summary of annual and season-day point source emissions, by source category. ................................................................................................................. 23 Table 3.1–1. List of area source categories................................................................................. 27 Table 3.2–1. Natural gas sales data from Maricopa County natural gas suppliers. .................... 28 Table 3.2–2. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source industrial natural gas combustion, by combustion type. .......................................................................... 29 Table 3.2–3. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source industrial natural gas combustion. ............................................................................................................ 29 Table 3.2–4. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source industrial fuel oil combustion, by combustion type. .......................................................................... 31 Table 3.2–5. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source industrial fuel oil combustion. ............................................................................................................ 31 Table 3.2–6. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source commercial/institutional natural gas combustion, by combustion type. ................ 32 Table 3.2–7. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source commercial/institutional natural gas combustion........................................................................................... 32 Table 3.2–8. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion, by combustion type. ...................... 34 Table 3.2–9. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion................................................................................................. 34 Table 3.2–10. Annual and season-day emissions from residential natural gas combustion. ........ 35 Table 3.2–11. Annual and season-day emissions from residential wood combustion.................. 37 Table 3.2–12. Annual and season-day emissions from residential fuel oil combustion. .............. 37 Table 3.2–13. Summary of annual and season-day area source fuel combustion......................... 37 Table 3.3–1. NAICS codes and descriptions for chemical manufacturing. ................................ 38 Table 3.3–2. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source chemical manufacturing...... 39 Table 3.3–3. Maricopa County restaurants, by type. .................................................................. 40 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory iv Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.3–4. Table 3.3–5. Table 3.3–6. Table 3.3–7. Table 3.3–8. Table 3.3–9. Table 3.4–1. Table 3.4–2. Table 3.4–3. Table 3.4–4. Table 3.4–5. Annual emissions from commercial cooking, by equipment type......................... 40 Season-day emissions from commercial cooking, by equipment type. ................. 40 Annual and season-day emissions from commercial cooking. .............................. 40 Emissions from ADEQ-permitted portable sources, by permit type. .................... 42 Annual and season-day emissions from other industrial processes. ...................... 42 Summary of annual and season-day area source industrial processes. .................. 42 Annual and season-day emissions from on-site incineration................................. 43 2002 Maricopa County burn permit activity data. ................................................. 44 Emission and fuel loading factors for open burning. ............................................. 44 Annual emissions from open burning (tons/yr). .................................................... 45 Surrogate land-use classes, ratios and annual emissions from open burning in the CO NAA........................................................................................................... 45 Table 3.4–6. Season-day emissions (lbs/day) from open burning. ............................................. 46 Table 3.4–7. Annual and season-day emissions from landfills................................................... 46 Table 3.4–8. Summary of annual and season-day emissions from waste treatment and disposal................................................................................................................... 47 Table 3.5–1. Emission and fuel loading factors for wildfires and brush fires. ........................... 47 Table 3.5–2. Annual emissions from wildfires and brush fires (tons/yr).................................... 48 Table 3.5–3. Season-day emissions from wildfires and brush fires (lbs/day)............................. 48 Table 3.5–4. Estimated material burned, emission and fuel loading factors for structure fires.. 49 Table 3.5–5. Annual and season-day emissions from structure fires.......................................... 50 Table 3.5–6. Estimated material burned, emission and fuel loading factors for vehicle fires. ... 50 Table 3.5–7. Annual and season-day emissions from vehicle fires. ........................................... 51 Table 3.5–8. Annual and season-day emissions from engine testing. ........................................ 51 Table 3.5–9. Annual and season-day emissions from crematories. ............................................ 52 Table 3.5–10. Annual and season-day emissions from accidental releases. ................................. 52 Table 3.5–11. Summary of annual and season-day emissions from all miscellaneous area sources.................................................................................................................... 52 Table 3.6–1. Summary of annual and season-day area source emissions, by source category... 53 Table 4.1–1. Default weekday and weekend day activity allocation fractions. .......................... 59 Table 4.2–1. Annual emissions from agricultural equipment in Maricopa County.................... 59 Table 4.2–2. Annual emissions from agricultural equipment in the CO nonattainment area. .... 60 Table 4.2–3. Total seasonal and season-day emissions from agricultural equipment in Maricopa County.................................................................................................... 60 Table 4.2–4. Season-day emissions from agricultural equipment in CO nonattainment area. ... 60 Table 4.3–1. Annual emissions from airport ground support equipment.................................... 61 Table 4.3–2. CO season-day emissions from airport ground support equipment. ...................... 61 Table 4.4–1. Annual emissions from commercial equipment..................................................... 61 Table 4.4–2. CO season-day emissions from commercial equipment. ....................................... 62 Table 4.5–1. Annual emissions from construction and mining equipment................................. 62 Table 4.5–2. CO season-day emissions from construction and mining equipment. ................... 62 Table 4.6–1. Annual emissions from industrial equipment. ....................................................... 63 Table 4.6–2. CO season-day emissions from industrial equipment............................................ 63 Table 4.7–1. Annual emissions from lawn and garden equipment. ............................................ 63 Table 4.7–2. CO season-day emissions from lawn and garden equipment................................. 64 Table 4.8–1. Annual emissions from logging equipment. .......................................................... 64 Table 4.8–2. CO season-day emissions from logging equipment............................................... 64 Table 4.9–1. Annual emissions from pleasure craft equipment.................................................. 65 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory v Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.9–2. CO season-day emissions from pleasure craft equipment. .................................... 65 Table 4.10–1. Annual emissions from railway maintenance equipment. ..................................... 65 Table 4.10–2. CO season-day emissions from railway maintenance equipment.......................... 66 Table 4.11–1. Annual emissions from recreational equipment..................................................... 66 Table 4.11–2. CO season-day emissions from recreational equipment. ....................................... 66 Table 4.12–1. NEI default emission factors, by aircraft type. ...................................................... 67 Table 4.12–2. 2002 airport activity data and emission calculation methods. ............................... 68 Table 4.12–3. Emission factors, and annual and CO season-day emissions, by airport and aircraft type. ........................................................................................................... 69 Table 4.13–1. Fuel use, emission factors, and annual emissions from locomotives in Maricopa County.................................................................................................... 70 Table 4.13–2. Annual CO nonattainment area emissions from locomotives. ............................. 70 Table 4.13–3. CO season-day emissions from locomotives. ........................................................ 71 Table 4.14–1. Summary of annual and season-day CO emissions from nonroad mobile sources.................................................................................................................... 71 Table 5.2–1. 2002 HPMS VMT by area type and facility type for the CO nonattainment area (annual average daily traffic). ................................................................................ 74 Table 5.2–2. 2002 HPMS VMT by area type and facility type for Maricopa County (annual average daily traffic) .............................................................................................. 75 Table 5.3–1. Average daily speeds (mph) for the 2002 periodic emissions inventory. .............. 76 Table 5.4–1. Average daily VMT adjustment factors by month................................................. 77 Table 5.4–2. Average daily VMT during 2002 carbon monoxide season for the CO nonattainment area (November 2002–January 2003). ........................................... 78 Table 5.4–3. Average daily VMT during 2002 carbon monoxide season for Maricopa County (November 2002–January 2003). .............................................................. 78 Table 5.5–1. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day). ............................................................. 85 Table 5.5–2. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day). ............................................................................ 89 Table 5.5–3. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic). .................................................. 93 Table 5.5–4. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic).................................................................. 97 Table 5.6–1. Daily CO emissions (kg/day) in the CO nonattainment area from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (winter day). .......... 101 Table 5.6–2. Daily CO emissions (kg day) in Maricopa County from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (winter day). ................................... 102 Table 5.6–3. Daily CO emissions (kg/day) in the CO nonattainment area from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (annual average day)....................................................................................................................... 103 Table 5.7–1. Comparison of CO emissions from onroad mobile sources and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the CO nonattainment area, 1990–2002. ............................... 105 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory vi Maricopa County, AZ List of Figures Figure 1.4–1. Map of Maricopa County and the CO, ozone, and PM10 nonattainment areas. ...... 2 Figure 1.6–1. Annual emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by source category (tons/yr). .... 7 Figure 1.6–2. Season-day emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by source category (lbs/day). .................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2.7–1. Data flow for annual point source emission inventory reporting........................... 24 Appendices Appendix 2.1 Instructions for Reporting 2002 Annual Air Pollution Emissions Appendix 3.1 2002 Fire Department Survey Results Appendix 5.1 Appendix 5.2 Appendix 5.3 Appendix 5.4 Appendix 5.5 Appendix 5.6 Appendix 5.7 Traffic Information MOBILE6.2 Inputs, Outputs, and Spreadsheet Vehicle Registration Data Minimum and Maximum Temperature Calculations VMT Reasonableness Calculations FORTRAN Source Code for Emission Factor Weighting Program Monthly Gasoline Data 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory vii Maricopa County, AZ 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory viii Maricopa County, AZ 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview This 2002 periodic carbon monoxide (CO) emissions inventory was developed to meet requirements set forth in Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). The CAAA require development of a baseline emission inventory and periodic revisions for areas that fail to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). A portion of Maricopa County is classified as serious nonattainment for carbon monoxide. This inventory includes emission estimates for carbon monoxide (CO) from point, area, nonroad mobile, and onroad mobile sources. Note that totals shown in all tables may not equal the sum of individual values due to independent rounding. 1.2 Agencies responsible for the emissions inventory Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has primary responsibility for preparing and submitting the 2002 Periodic Ozone Emissions Inventory for Maricopa County. Stationary point, area, and nonroad mobile source emission estimates for aircraft and locomotives were prepared by MCESD. The remaining nonroad mobile emission estimates were developed by ENVIRON International Corporation (Environ et al., 2003), with additional work conducted by MCESD to develop estimates for the nonattainment area and a typical season day. The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) prepared the onroad mobile emissions estimates. Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) activities are described in each chapter. The persons responsible for inventory preparation and QA/QC activities for each chapter are listed in Table 1.2–1. Table 1.2–1. Chapter authors and QA/QC contacts. Chapter Author(s) Point Sources Bob Downing MCESD (602) 506-6790 QA/QC contact persons Matt Poppen, Eric Raisanen and Dena Konopka MCESD (602) 506-6790 Area Sources Matt Poppen, Eric Raisanen and Dena Konopka MCESD (602) 506-6790 Bob Downing MCESD (602) 506-6790 Ruey-in Chiou and Scott DiBiase MAG (602) 254-6300 Nonroad Mobile Sources Matt Poppen and Eric Raisanen MCESD (602) 506-6790 Bob Downing and Dena Konopka MCESD (602) 506-6790 Ruey-in Chiou and Scott DiBiase MAG (602) 254-6300 Onroad Mobile Sources Roger Roy MAG (602) 254-6300 Ruey-in Chiou MAG (602) 254-6300 Bob Downing and Dena Konopka MCESD (602) 506-6790 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 1 Maricopa County, AZ 1.3 Temporal scope Annual and CO season-day emissions were estimated for the year 2002, for Maricopa County and the Maricopa County CO nonattainment area (NAA). The three-month peak CO season for Maricopa County is defined as November through January. The CO season is based on CO exceedances from 1988 through 1991 and is consistent with the CO season in the 1990 base year inventory. 1.4 Geographic scope This inventory includes emission estimates for Maricopa County and for the Maricopa County CO nonattainment area. Maricopa County encompasses approximately 9,223 square miles of land area, while the Maricopa County CO nonattainment area is approximately 1,946 square miles or approximately 21 percent of the Maricopa County land area. A map of Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area is provided in Figure 1.4–1. Figure 1.4–1. Map of Maricopa County and the CO, ozone, and PM10 nonattainment areas. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 2 Maricopa County, AZ 1.5 Overview of local demographic and land-use data Many of the emissions estimates generated in this report were calculated using demographic and land-use data provided by the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG). These data were used to apportion and/or scale Maricopa County emissions estimates to the nonattainment area and vice versa. (For example, county-level emissions from residential natural gas usage in Maricopa County was apportioned to the nonattainment area using the ratio of occupied households in each area). Detailed explanations of how emission estimates were apportioned or scaled are presented in each of the following chapters, along with the data sources used. 1.5.1 Demographic data The demographic data provided by MAG included population, housing and employment data for calendar year 2002, for Maricopa County and the nonattainment area. Table 1.5-1 provides an overview of the demographic data used in this report. Table 1.5–1. Demographic profile of Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Maricopa Within Percent within Demographic variable County CO NAA CO NAA Total resident population 3,296,250 3,232,387 98.06% Total non-resident population 253,443 249,420 98.41% Total population: 3,549,693 3,481,807 98.09% Occupied resident housing units Total non-resident households Total occupied households: 1,215,173 146,664 1,361,837 1,192,680 144,419 1,337,099 98.15% 98.47% 98.18% Retail employment Office employment Industrial employment Public employment Other employment Total employment: 438,674 392,383 383,938 221,676 232,614 1,669,285 431,973 390,375 376,610 213,061 227,953 1,639,972 98.47% 99.49% 98.09% 96.11% 98.00% 98.24% 1.5.2 Land-use data The most recent land-use data available from MAG was for the year 2000. The 2000 land-use data was assumed to be representative of 2002. Table 1.5–2 presents a summary of the land-use categories and acreage used to develop emission estimates for this inventory. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 3 Maricopa County, AZ Table 1.5–2. Land-use categories used to apportion emissions. Acreage in Maricopa County Description Active open space (e.g., parks) 127,792 Passive open space (e.g., mountain preserves) 2,057,048 General open space (not elsewhere classified) 849 Golf courses 22,922 Water 110,940 Agriculture 415,473 Vacant (e.g., developable land) 2,653,351 Acreage within CO NAA 90,038 40,846 782 22,231 38,057 185,029 414,465 Percent within CO NAA 70.46% 1.99% 92.16% 96.98% 34.30% 44.53% 15.62% 1.6 Emissions overview by source category 1.6.1 Point sources The point source category includes those stationary sources that emit a significant amount of pollution into the air such as power plants and large industrial facilities. As Maricopa County has an established annual reporting program for sources with air quality permits, the thresholds for defining a point source are lower than the minimums required by the US EPA. For the purposes of this inventory, a point source is a stationary operation within Maricopa County or within 25 miles of the CO nonattainment area, which in 2002 emitted: • 25 English (short) tons or more of carbon monoxide (CO); or • 10 tons or more of volatile organic compounds (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), or sulfur oxides (SOx); or • 5 tons or more of particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) or ammonia compounds (NHx). Table 1.6–1 summarizes annual and season-day emissions of the chief point source categories. A detailed breakdown of emissions calculations for all point sources is contained in Chapter 2. Table 1.6–1. Summary of annual and season-day point source emissions, by source category. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Electricity generation 1,058.24 3,484.0 894.61 2,598.0 Commercial/institutional fuel combustion 45.63 329.7 45.63 329.9 Industrial fuel combustion 426.42 2,618.6 401.93 2,472.6 Industrial processes 82.08 565.5 82.07 565.5 Manufacturing processes 146.12 959.9 135.99 882.0 Waste disposal 64.39 343.8 56.41 299.9 All point sources: 1,822.88 8,301.5 1,616.64 7,147.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 4 Maricopa County, AZ 1.6.2 Area sources Area sources are facilities or activities whose individual emissions do not qualify them as point sources. Area sources represent numerous facilities or activities that individually release small amounts of a given pollutant, but collectively they can release significant amounts of a pollutant. Stationary sources with annual emissions lower than the point source thresholds described in Section 1.6.1 were included in the area source inventory. Examples of area source categories include residential wood burning, commercial cooking, waste incineration, and wildfires. Table 1.6–2 summarizes annual and season-day emissions of the chief area source categories, for both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. A detailed breakdown of emissions calculations for each area source category is contained in Chapter 3. Table 1.6–2. Summary of annual and season-day area source emissions, by source category. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Fuel combustion 4,817.71 66,584.1 4,730.96 65,380.8 Industrial processes 412.98 2,398.4 407.74 2,369.6 Waste treatment/disposal 616.30 3,794.2 159.71 723.5 Miscellaneous area sources 2,976.99 2,537.6 243.43 1,472.8 All area sources: 8,823.98 75,314.2 5,541.86 69,946.8 1.6.3 Nonroad mobile sources Nonroad mobile sources include off-highway vehicles and engines that move or are moved within a 12-month period. Table 1.6–3 summarizes annual and season-day emissions from nonroad mobile sources, for both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. A detailed breakdown of emissions calculations for each source category is contained in Chapter 4. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 5 Maricopa County, AZ Table 1.6–3. Summary of annual and season-day CO emissions from nonroad mobile sources. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Equipment category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Agricultural 632.96 861.9 281.86 383.8 Airport ground support equipment 3,471.09 19,071.9 3,384.31 18,595.1 Commercial 45,797.55 244,320.3 44,922.82 239,653.8 Construction & mining 15,584.58 70,666.5 15,286.91 69,316.8 Industrial 15,135.47 89,552.2 14,846.38 87,841.8 Lawn & garden 77,273.13 111,110.3 75,866.76 109,088.1 Logging 136.54 744.7 133.93 730.5 Pleasure craft 1,423.91 4,272.3 488.40 1,465.4 Railway maintenance 61.28 371.7 60.11 364.6 Recreational 9,788.20 32,092.5 987.63 3,238.1 Aircraft 10,097.03 55,478.2 9,888.43 54,332.0 Locomotives 344.35 1,886.8 160.78 881.0 All nonroad mobile sources: 179,746.09 630,429.3 166,308.32 585,891.0 1.6.4 Onroad mobile sources Emission from onroad mobile sources were calculated for the CO nonattainment area located primarily within Maricopa County as well as for Maricopa County as a whole. A detailed breakdown of emissions calculations by vehicle class and roadway type is contained in Chapter 5. Tables 1.6–4 summarizes annual and season-day emissions from onroad mobile sources for both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Table 1.6–4. Annual and season-day emissions from onroad mobile sources in Maricopa County. Annual emissions Season-day (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Geographic area Maricopa County 352,821 1,925,867 CO NAA 322,867 1,763,151 1.6.5 Summary of emissions by source category Figures 1.6–1 and 1.6–2 provide a graphical overview of the relative contributions of the major source categories (point, area, nonroad, and onroad) to CO emissions in the nonattainment area, on an annual and season-day basis, respectively. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 6 Maricopa County, AZ Figure 1.6–1. Annual emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by source category (tons/yr). Area: 5,541.9 (1%) Points: 1,616.6 (< 1%) Nonroad: 166,308.3 (34%) Onroad: 322,867.0 (65%) Figure 1.6–2. Season-day emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by source category (lbs/day). Area: 69,947 (3%) Points: 7,148 (< 1%) Nonroad: 585,891 (24%) Onroad: 1,763,151 (73%) 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 7 Maricopa County, AZ Tables 1.6–5 and 1.6–6 provides a comparison between this inventory and earlier periodic CO emissions inventories for the CO nonattainment area. Note that figures may not be directly comparable as calculation methods, emission factors, and source category definitions (e.g., point vs. area sources) may have changed over time. Table 1.6–5. Summary of annual CO emissions (tons/yr) in the CO nonattainment area, by source category, 1990–2002. Inventory year Source category 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 Points 1,299 874 665 1,753 1,617 Area 13,338 14,231 3,730 5,840 5,542 Nonroad mobile 167,303 166,335 184,220 195,042 166,308 Onroad mobile* n/a n/a n/a n/a 322,867 173,467 ** Total 181,940 181,440 188,615 202,635 * Prior-year inventories did not include annual totals of onroad mobile emissions. ** Total does not include onroad mobile sources, to allow more direct comparison to prior-year inventories. Table 1.6–6. Summary of CO season-day emissions (lbs/day) in the CO nonattainment area, by source category, 1990–2002. Inventory year Source category 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 Points 17,400 14,800 12,600 18,180 7,148 Area 175,400 186,600 42,000 48,120 69,947 Nonroad mobile 476,000 460,000 904,000 1,147,900 585,891 Onroad mobile 1,615,410 1,220,223 1,120,508 1,080,829 1,763,151 Total 2,284,210 1,881,623 2,079,108 2,295,029 2,426,137 1.7 References ENVIRON et al., 2003. Maricopa County 2002 Comprehensive Emission Inventory for the Cap and Trade Oversight Committee, Final Rep. prepared for Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality, October 9, 2003. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 8 Maricopa County, AZ 2. Point Sources 2.1 Introduction and scope This carbon monoxide (CO) inventory is one of a number of emission inventory reports being prepared to meet US EPA reporting requirements. In addition to preparing periodic emissions inventories for the CO nonattainment area (NAA) as a commitment under the current CO State Implementation Plan (SIP), the federal Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule (CERR) requires that state and local agencies prepare emissions estimates on a county basis, and submit data electronically to the US EPA for inclusion in the National Emission Inventory (NEI) for 2002. This CO inventory is being developed concurrently with similar inventories for ozone precursors (VOC, NOx and CO), and PM (including PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SOx, and NH3), as part of Maricopa County's requirements under the respective SIPs. In order to provide consistency among all these inventories, it was decided to standardize the definition of a “point source”. While the US EPA has defined minimum point source reporting thresholds for various pollutants, EPA guidance also notes that: … we encourage organizations to provide facility-specific emissions data for all point sources, regardless of size, where they are already included in the S/L/T [state/local/tribal] emission inventory. (US EPA, 2003) As Maricopa County has an established annual reporting program for sources with air quality permits, the thresholds for defining a point source are lower than the minimums required by EPA. For the purposes of this inventory, a point source is a stationary operation within Maricopa County or within 25 miles of the CO nonattainment area, which in 2002 emitted: • 25 English (short) tons or more of carbon monoxide (CO); or • 10 tons or more of volatile organic compounds (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), or sulfur oxides (SOx); or • 5 tons or more of particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) or ammonia compounds (NHx). While the above approach results in some anomalies (e.g., a facility treated as a point source may have very low, or no, emissions of a certain pollutant), a uniform definition of “point source” ensures that all data sets, which are prepared for a variety of purposes, will be comparable. This point source inventory includes actual CO emissions for the year 2002 and a typical day during the CO season (defined as November through January). A description and map of the nonattainment area are provided in Chapter 1. Questions concerning point source emissions may be directed to Bob Downing of MCESD at (602) 506-6790. Several tables have been constructed to provide the point source emissions and category totals. Table 2.2–1 summarizes all point sources by location and permitting authority. Table 2.2–2 provides an alphabetical list of all point sources and their location, while Table 2.3–1 shows the 2002 annual and average CO season-day emissions broken out by facility. Table 2.5–1 lists the 2002 annual and CO season-day emissions broken out by individual process types, and Table 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 9 Maricopa County, AZ 2.6–1 summarizes point source CO emissions by source category. Note that totals shown in all tables may not equal the sum of individual values due to independent rounding. 2.2 Identification of CO point sources Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) identified point sources within Maricopa County through its permit system database and the 2002 annual emissions reports submitted to the department. In addition, the permit system was reviewed to locate new facilities that were not included in the previous emission inventory, and to identify sources that have ceased operations since the 1999 periodic inventory was compiled. A total of 172 point sources were identified using the emission thresholds described in Section 2.1. Of the 172 stationary point sources, 111 MCSED-permitted sources reported some level of CO emissions – 97 within the CO nonattainment area, and 14 outside the CO NAA. There are 2 additional point sources (Hexcel Corp. and SRP Desert Basin Generating Station) within the 25mile boundary around the CO nonattainment area, with permits issued by the Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD). While the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) retains permitting authority for a limited number of industrial source categories in Maricopa County, no ADEQ-permitted facilities are considered point sources, and are addressed instead as area sources. Table 2.2–1. Number of stationary point sources by location and permitting authority. Total no. of Facilities reporting Location facilities CO emissions Within the CO nonattainment area: – Maricopa County-permitted sites 153 97 Outside the CO nonattainment area: – Maricopa County-permitted sites – Pinal County-permitted sites Total outside NAA: Grand total: 17 2 19 172 14 2 16 113 Table 2.2–2 contains an alphabetical list of all point sources, including a unique business identification number, NAICS industry classification code, business name (including any changes from the 1999 periodic inventory), and physical address. Table 2.2–2. Name and location of all point sources. Within the CO nonattainment area: ID # NAICS Business name 1074 22132 23rd Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant (formerly City of Phoenix 23rd Ave. WWTP) 1075 22132 91st Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant 245 337122 A. F. Lorts Company Inc. 1952 811121 Adesa Phoenix LLC 1239 332321 AG Products 35541 33121 Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. 199 327332 Ameron Intl. Water Transmission Group (formerly Ameron Pipe) 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 10 Address 2470 S. 22nd Ave. City Phoenix ZIP 85009 5615 S. 91st Ave. 8120 W. Harrison St. 400 N. Beck Ave. 2525 W. Broadway Rd.. 2525 N. 27th Ave. 2325 S. 7th St. Tolleson Tolleson Chandler Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix 85353 85353 85226 85041 85009 85034 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.2–2. Name and location of point sources (continued). ID # NAICS Business name 292 325412 Anabolic Laboratories Inc. (formerly Health Factors International Inc.) 3313 221112 APS West Phoenix Power Plant 3938 332812 Arizona Galvanizing Inc. 4364 61131 Arizona State University 36485 54185 Billboard Poster Company Inc. 43124 313230 Bonded Logic Inc. 3441 42471 BP West Coast Products LLC 458 32191 Bryant Industries Inc. 217 327123 Building Products Co. 3442 493190 Caljet (formerly Caljet/Williams) 60598 337211 Case Furniture & Design LLC 1317 321991 Cavco Industries LLC (35th Ave.) 1318 321991 Cavco Industries LLC (Litchfield Rd.) 1316 321991 Cavco Industries LLC (Durango Plant) 4145 61111 Cave Creek School District 1267 32732 Cemex Mesa Plants #61 & #71 1266 212321 Cemex USA (Phoenix) 1268 212321 Cemex USA (Sun City) 1310 32311 Century Graphics LLC 1426 32311 Cesar Color Inc. 4401 32732 Chandler Ready Mix Inc. 51073 52312 Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. 3297 42471 Chevron USA Inc. 3976 33711 Cholla Custom Cabinets Inc. 4083 32191 Chris Fischer Productions Inc. 399 32739 Coreslab Structures (Ariz) Inc. 1198 32311 Courier Graphics Corp. 4368 32191 Craftsmen in Wood Mfg. 4023 321918 Creative Shutters Inc. 3744 325991 Desert Sun Fiberglass 130 331512 Dolphin Inc. 508 337122 Eagle Industries LLC (formerly Samuel Lawrence Furniture Co.) 45493 811121 Earnhardt Ford 3305 311812 Earthgrains Baking Companies Inc. 26 423810 Empire Machinery Co. 1505 32191 Executive Door 544 321991 Fleetwood Homes of Arizona Inc. #21 27728 334413 FlipChip International LLC (formerly Flip Chip Technologies) 41751 326121 GCR Truck Tire Center 4050 311812 General Mills (formerly Pillsbury Bakeries & Food Service) 4173 562212 Glendale Municipal Sanitary Landfill 781 62211 Good Samaritan Regional Medical Ctr. 1418 326299 Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products (formerly BF Goodrich Aircraft Evacuation Sys.) 36772 212321 GTI Capital Holdings LLC 699 212321 Hanson Aggregates of Arizona (Phoenix) 31565 32614 Henry Products Inc. 529 32614 Highland Products Inc. 4543 32311 Hogue Printing Inc. 3536 311812 Holsum Bakery Inc. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 11 Address 429 S. Siesta Ln. City Tempe ZIP 85281 4606 W. Hadley St. 15775 Elwood St. 1551 S. Rural Rd. 3940 W. Montecito Ave. 411 E. Ray Rd. 5333 W. Van Buren St. 788 W. Illini St. 4850 W. Buckeye Rd 125 N. 53rd Ave. 4645 W. Polk St. 2602 S. 35th Ave. 1366 S. Litchfield Rd. 2502 W. Durango St. 33606 N. 60th St. 1901 N. Alma School Rd. 11701 W. Indian School 24004 N. 107th Ave. 2960 Grand Ave. 3433 E. Wood St. 6500 N. 115th Ave. 2121 S. Price Rd. 5110 W. Madison St. 1727 E. Deer Valley Dr. 4741 W. Polk St. 5026 S. 43rd Ave. 2621 S. 37th St. 5441 W. Hadley St. 2009 W. Ironwood Dr. 21412 N. 14th Ave. 740 S. 59th Ave. 601 S. 65th Ave. Phoenix Goodyear Tempe Phoenix Chandler Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Goodyear Phoenix Cave Creek Mesa Phoenix Sun City Phoenix Phoenix Glendale Chandler Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix 85043 85338 85287 85019 85225 85043 85041 85043 85043 85043 85009 85338 85009 85331 85201 85063 85373 85017 85040 85323 85248 85043 85024 85043 85041 85034 85043 85021 85027 85043 85043 7300 W. Orchid Ln. 738 W. Van Buren St. 1725 S. Country Club Dr. 3939 W. Clarendon Ave. 6112 N. 56th Ave. 3701 E. University Dr. Chandler Phoenix Mesa Phoenix Glendale Phoenix 85226 85007 85210 85019 85311 85034 2815 N. 32nd Ave. 1120 W. Fairmont Dr. Phoenix Tempe 85009 85282 11480 W. Glendale Ave. 1111 E. McDowell Rd. 3414 S. 5th St. Glendale Phoenix Phoenix 85301 85006 85040 3636 S. 43rd Ave. 4002 S. 51st Ave. 302 S. 23rd Ave. 43 N. 48th Ave. 159 W. 1st Ave. 2322 W. Lincoln St. Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Mesa Phoenix 85009 85043 85009 85043 85210 85009 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.2–2. Name and location of point sources (continued). ID # NAICS Business name 3802 311812 Holsum Bakery Tempe 1059 336412 Honeywell Engines Systems & Service (formerly Honeywell Aerospace Services) 355 336412 Honeywell International Inc. 354 331314 Imsamet of Arizona 777 32614 Insulfoam 3966 334413 Intel Corp. Ocotillo Campus (Fab 12 & 22) (formerly Intel Corp. Ocotillo Campus Fab 12) 983 334419 Isola Laminate Systems Corp. 3317 221112 Kyrene Generating Station (formerly SRP Kyrene Steam Plant) 341 325991 L & M Laminates & Marble 4182 337122 Legends Furniture Inc. 857 334412 Litton Electro-Optical Systems 3300 92811 Luke Air Force Base 744 3325 M. E. Global Inc. (formerly M. E. West Castings Inc.) 1248 325991 Maax Spas 31261 21231 Madison Granite Supplies 4111 337121 Magic Woods Inc. 205 322232 Mail-Well Envelope 353 326199 Marlam Industries Inc. 61268 327390 Master Block Inc. 62 33711 Mastercraft Cabinets Inc. 3326 352991 Mesa Fully Formed Inc. 1414 212321 Mesa Materials Inc. (Mesa) 1415 212321 Mesa Materials Inc. (Phoenix) 29474 423930 Metal Management Arizona Inc. 1203 334413 Microchip Technology Inc. (Chandler) 1875 334413 Microchip Technology Inc. (Tempe) 226 32739 Monier Lifetile LLC 882 311942 Morton Salt Glendale Facility 881 334413 Motorola Inc. 223 333112 MTD Southwest Inc. 693 333415 Munters Corp. 34197 327420 National Gypsum Co. 948 32614 Nesco Manufacturing Inc. 1309 337122 New Directions Inc. 1331 337122 Oak Canyon Manufacturing Inc. (formerly Aspen II) 3953 33711 Oakcraft Inc. 27925 337122 Oasis Bedroom Co. 52382 221112 Ocotillo Power Plant 3982 32311 O'Neil Printing Inc. 3970 337122 Pacific Designs 1344 321991 Palm Harbor Homes Inc. 733 811412 Pan-Glo West 419 336412 Parker Hannifin GTFSD 1341 33992 Penn Racquet Sports Inc. 1014 327121 Phoenix Brick Yard 562 51111 Phoenix Newspapers Inc. 148 331528 Presto Casting Co. 60889 326212 Purcell’s Western States Tire 1030 32311 Quebecor World Phoenix Division 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 12 Address 710 W. Geneva Dr. 1944 E. Sky Harbor Cir. City Tempe Phoenix ZIP 85252 85034 111 S. 34th St. 3829 S. Estrella Pkwy. 3401 W. Cocopah St. 4500 S. Dobson Rd. Phoenix Goodyear Phoenix Chandler 85034 85338 85009 85248 165 S. Price Rd. 7005 S. Kyrene Rd. Chandler Tempe 85224 85283 813 E. University Dr. 5555 N. 51st Ave. 1215 S. 52nd St. 14002 W. Marauder St. 5857 S. Kyrene Rd. Phoenix Glendale Tempe Glendale Tempe 85034 85301 85281 85309 85283 25605 S. Arizona Ave. 30600 N. 23rd Ave. 4210 N. 39th Ave. 221 N. 48th Ave. 834 E. Hammond Ln. 12620 W. Butler Dr. 305 S. Brooks 1111 S. Sirrine St. 3410 N. Higley Rd. 7845 W. Broadway Rd. 3640 S. 35th Ave. 2355 W. Chandler Blvd. 1200 S. 52nd St. 1832 S. 51st Ave. 13000 W. Glendale Ave. 1300 N. Alma School Rd. 550 N. 54th St. 802 S. 59th Ave. 1414 E. Hadley St. 1510 W. Drake Dr. 2940 W. Willetta St. 3021 N. 29th Dr. Chandler Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix El Mirage Mesa Mesa Mesa Phoenix Phoenix Chandler Tempe Phoenix Glendale Chandler Chandler Phoenix Phoenix Tempe Phoenix Phoenix 85248 85027 85019 85043 85034 85335 85202 85210 85205 85043 85009 85224 85281 85043 85307 85224 85226 85043 85034 85283 85009 85017 7733 W. Olive Ave. 2022 N. 22nd Ave. 1500 E. University Dr. 366 N. 2nd Ave. 2425 W. Sherman St. 309 S. Perry Ln. 2401 W. Sherman St. 7777 N. Glen Harbor Bd. 306 S. 45th Ave. 1814 S. 7th Ave. 22600 N. 19th Ave. 5440 W. Missouri Ave. 420 S. 35th Ave. 1850 E. Watkins St. Peoria Phoenix Tempe Phoenix Phoenix Tempe Phoenix Glendale Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Glendale Phoenix Phoenix 85345 85009 85281 85003 85043 85281 85009 85307 85043 85007 85027 85301 85009 85034 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.2–2. Name and location of point sources (continued). ID # NAICS Business name 537 327999 Red Mountain Mining Inc. 1503 321991 Redman Homes Inc. 303 332431 Rexam Beverage Can Company 4318 32732 River Ranch Plant 759 32613 Rogers Corp. Advanced Circuit Materials 1437 334412 Sanmina Phoenix Division (formerly Hadco Phoenix Inc./Sanmina Phx. Div.) 3315 221112 Santan Generating Station (formerly Santan Generating Plant) 266 332312 Schuff Steel Co. 42636 62211 Scottsdale Health Care Hospital 4175 493190 SFPP LP 70634 42471 Shell Oil Phoenix Terminal (formerly Texaco Phoenix Terminal) 27933 562212 Skunk Creek Landfill 4471 332311 Skyline Steel Inc. 31627 115111 South Mountain Gin 3316 221112 SRP Agua Fria 4131 334413 ST Microelectronics 1444 327123 Staco Architectural Roof Tile 582 337122 Stone Creek Inc. 281 212321 Sun State Rock & Materials 101 31161 Sunland Beef Co. 52471 325188 Superior Lime & Chemical 3978 337122 Team Two Design Assoc Inc. 249 336411 The Boeing Company 937 336211 The Heil Company 232 72111 The Phoenician Resort 1102 325412 The Procter & Gamble Mfg Co. 552 337122 Thornwood Furniture Mfg. 363 337122 Thunderbird Furniture 56 32739 TPAC Division of Kiewit Western Co. 1210 337122 Trendwood Inc. (15th Ave.) 1211 337122 Trendwood Inc. (University Dr.) 819 336399 TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. 169 811111 U Haul Intl. Technical Center 1228 325991 Ultra Installations Inc. 234 311514 United Dairymen of Arizona 260 212321 United Metro Plant #11 213 212321 United Metro Plant #12 403 331316 VAW of America 2 32412 Vulcan Materials Co. (El Mirage) 90 32732 Vulcan Materials Co. (Phoenix) 174 325998 W. R. Meadows of Arizona Inc. 141 424910 Western Organics Inc. 4384 321918 Western Shutter LLC 2703 42471 Western States Petroleum 20706 32614 Wincup Holdings Inc. 1382 33711 Woodcase Fine Cabinetry Inc. (formerly McCarthy Cabinet Co.) 72 337122 Woodstuff Manufacturing Inc. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 13 Address 4250 N. Bush Hwy. 400 E. Ray Rd. 211 N. 51st Ave. 5159 N. El Mirage Rd. 100 S. Roosevelt Ave. 5020 S. 36th St. City Mesa Chandler Phoenix Litchfield Pk Chandler Phoenix ZIP 85215 85225 85043 85340 85226 85040 1005 S. Val Vista Rd. Gilbert 85296 420 S. 19th Ave. 7400 E. Osborn Rd. 49 N. 53rd Ave. 5325 W. Van Buren St. Phoenix Scottsdale Phoenix Phoenix 85009 85251 85043 85043 3165 W. Happy Valley Rd 631 W. Commerce Ave. 6411 S. 51st Ave. 7302 W. Northern Ave. 1000 E. Bell Rd. 3530 E. Elwood St. 4221 E. Raymond St. 11500 W. Beardsley Rd. 651 S. 91st Ave. 320 S. 27th Ave. 310 S. 43rd Ave. 5000 E. McDowell Rd. 1500 S. 7th St. 6000 E. Camelback Rd. 2050 S. 35th Ave. 5125 E. Madison St. 7501 E. Redfield Rd. 3052 S. 19th Ave. 2402 S. 15th Ave. 261 E. University Dr. 11202 E. Germann Rd. 11298 S. Priest Dr. 245 S. Mulberry 2008 S. Hardy Dr. 3640 S. 19th Ave. 11920 W. Glendale Ave. 249 S. 51st Ave. 14521 N. 115th Ave. 4830 S. 43rd Ave. 2636 S. Sarival Ave. 2807 S. 27th Ave. 4038 E. Madison St. 450 S. 15th Ave. 7980 W. Buckeye Rd. 3255 W. Osborn Rd. Phoenix Gilbert Laveen Glendale Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Sun City Tolleson Phoenix Phoenix Mesa Phoenix Scottsdale Phoenix Phoenix Scottsdale Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Queen Creek Tempe Mesa Tempe Phoenix Glendale Phoenix El Mirage Phoenix Goodyear Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix 85027 85233 85339 85303 85022 85040 85040 85373 85353 85009 85009 85215 85034 85251 85009 85034 85260 85009 85007 85004 85242 85284 85202 85282 85009 85307 85043 85335 85041 85338 85009 85034 85007 85043 85017 1635 S. 43rd Ave. Phoenix 85009 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.2–2. Name and location of point sources (continued). The following point sources are outside the CO nonattainment area: ID # NAICS Business name Address 31606 115111 Acme Gin Co. Inc. 7401 S. Wilson Rd. 1874 212321 Alleco Stone LLC 10401 S. Miller Rd. 31643 562212 Allied Waste Industries Inc. 24427 S. Hwy 85 31637 115111 Anderson Clayton Corp. Valencia Gin 25500 W. Southern Ave. 1218 562212 Butterfield Station 40404 S. 99th Ave. 1389 541380 DaimlerChrysler AZ Proving Grounds 33040 N. 203rd Ave. 43063 221112 Duke Energy Arlington Valley LLC 39027 W. Elliot Rd. 1488 115111 Farmers Gin Inc. 8400 S. Turner St. 10211 Hexcel Corp. † 1214 W. Gila Bend Hwy. 725 212321 Kilauea Crushers Inc. Hwy 74 1879 562212 Northwest Regional Landfill 19401 W. Deer Valley Rd 98 221113 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 5801 S. Wintersburg Rd. 428 115111 Paloma Gin Properties LLC I-8 289 115111 Phoenix Agro Invest Inc. 51040 W. Valley Rd. 42956 221112 Pinnacle West Energy Corp. 11600 S. 363rd Ave. 44182 332312 Quincy Joist Company 22253 W. Southern Ave. 246 321991 Schult Homes 231 N. Apache Rd. 10469 221112 SRP Desert Basin Generating Station † 1872 N. Burris Rd. 398 212321 Wickenburg Facility 44605 Grand Ave. † Source is located in Pinal County. 2.3 City Buckeye Buckeye Buckeye Buckeye Mobile Wittmann Arlington Buckeye Casa Grande Wickenburg Surprise Tonopah GilaBend Aguila Arlington Buckeye Buckeye Casa Grande Wickenburg ZIP 85326 85326 85326 85326 85239 85361 85322 85326 85222 85358 85374 85354 85337 85320 85322 85326 85326 85222 85390 Procedures for estimating emissions from point sources Both annual and average season-day CO emissions were estimated from annual source emission reports, MCESD investigation reports, permit files and logs, or telephone contacts with sources. For most of the sources, material balance methods were used for determining emissions. Emissions were estimated using the emission factors from AP–42, source tests, engineering calculations, or manufacturers' specifications. MCESD distributes annual emissions survey forms to nearly all facilities for which MCESD has issued an operating permit. Facilities are required to report detailed information on stacks, control devices, operating schedules, and process-level information concerning their annual activities. (See Appendix 2.1 for a copy of the instructions to complete the emissions inventory.) These instructions include examples and explanations on how to complete the annual emissions reporting forms that facilities must submit to MCESD. Activity data reported for the December– February winter season is presumed to be representative of the November–January CO season. After a facility has submitted an annual emissions report to MCESD, emissions inventory staff check all reports for missing and questionable data, and check the accuracy and reasonableness of all emissions calculations with AP–42, the Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) software, and other EPA documentation. Control efficiencies are determined by source tests when available, or by AP–42 factors, engineering calculations, or manufacturers' specifications. MCESD has conducted annual emissions surveys for permitted facilities since 1988, and the department's database system, EMS, contains numerous automated quality assurance/quality control checks for data input and processing. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 14 Maricopa County, AZ 2.3.1 Example 1: Ocotillo Power Plant General Facility Information: Arizona Public Service (APS) operates a peaking electric generating plant with two steam units (gas/oil-fired boilers) and two natural-gas turbines. APS provided its total annual fuel consumption for each unit, as well as daily and seasonal operating activity. Total annual emissions from boilers and turbines are summed to obtain the facility's total annual CO emissions. The Ocotillo power plant provided the following information. The following data were used to calculate emissions from boilers and turbines: SCC 10100604 20100201 Source type Natural gas boilers Natural gas turbines Annual fuel consumption 3,406.56 MMCF 673.59 MMCF CO emission factor 24 lb/ MMCF 83.64 lb/ MMCF CO emissions (lbs/yr) 81,757.0 56,339.0 Calculation of annual CO emissions: Annual emissions (lbs) = Annual fuel consumption × emission factor CO emissions from natural-gas boilers = 3,406.56 MMCF × 24 lb CO/MMCF = 81,757 lbs CO/yr CO emissions from natural-gas turbines = 673.59 MMCF × 83.64 lb CO/MMCF = 56,339 lbs CO/yr Total CO emissions = 81,757 lbs + 56,339 lbs = 138,096 lbs/yr = 69.05 tons CO/yr Calculation of CO season-day emissions: APS provided seasonal operating data for each boiler and turbine. The activity reported for the December–February time period ranged from 14 to 37 percent among all natural-gas fired equipment. The average season-day emissions were calculated individually, as illustrated in the following example for Steam Unit No. 1 burning natural gas: CO season-day emissions = annual emissions × seasonal activity factor ÷ (days/week × weeks/season) = 50,986 lb CO × 19% ÷ (7 days/wk × 13 wks/season) = 106.5 lbs CO/season day The daily calculations for each boiler and turbine were then summed to derive total CO seasonday emissions. 2.3.2 Example 2: Imsamet of Arizona General Facility Information: This secondary foundry facility has two electric arc furnaces (EAFs) and two heat treat furnaces. Carbon monoxide emissions of 21.5 lbs/hr of operation were calculated from stack tests conducted on the electric arc furnaces in 1999. Seasonal activity levels for each process are also reported annually. Calculation of annual CO emissions: Annual emissions (lbs) = Total hours of operation × emission factor = 7,503 hrs/yr × 21.5 lb CO/hr = 161,315 lbs CO/yr = 80.66 tons CO/yr 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 15 Maricopa County, AZ Calculation of CO season-day emissions: CO season-day emissions = Annual emissions × seasonal activity factor ÷ (days/week × weeks/season) = 161,315 lbs/yr × 26% ÷ ( 7 days/wk × 13 wks/season) = 460.9 lbs CO/day Table 2.3–1 provides a list of annual and season-day CO emissions from those point sources that reported CO emissions, broken out by location (inside or outside the CO nonattainment area). Table 2.3–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by facility. Facilities within the CO nonattainment area: Annual CO Season-day CO emissions (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) ID # Business name City 1074 23rd Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant Phoenix 50.91 258.7 1075 91st Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant Tolleson 4.03 43.0 245 A F Lorts Company Inc. Tolleson 0.01 0.1 1952 Adesa Phoenix LLC Chandler 0.01 0.0 35541 Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. Phoenix 0.33 1.9 199 Ameron Intl. Water Transmission Group Phoenix 0.53 11.0 292 Anabolic Laboratories Inc. Tempe 0.12 0.9 3313 APS West Phoenix Power Plant Phoenix 116.58 429.6 3938 Arizona Galvanizing Inc. Goodyear 2.98 17.8 4364 Arizona State University Tempe 15.14 138.7 43124 Bonded Logic Inc. Chandler 0.16 1.3 217 Building Products Co. Phoenix 16.73 92.3 3442 Caljet Phoenix 4.30 23.6 4145 Cave Creek School District Cave Creek 3.21 24.8 1267 Cemex Mesa Plants #61 & #71 Mesa 2.14 10.4 1310 Century Graphics LLC Phoenix 0.04 0.3 1426 Cesar Color Inc. Phoenix 0.41 3.1 51073 Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. Chandler 0.92 5.0 3976 Cholla Custom Cabinets Inc. Phoenix 0.01 0.1 1198 Courier Graphics Corp. Phoenix 0.20 1.4 4368 Craftsmen in Wood Mfg. Phoenix 0.06 0.5 130 Dolphin Inc. Phoenix 1.71 12.1 508 Eagle Industries LLC Phoenix 0.02 0.2 3305 Earthgrains Baking Companies Inc. Phoenix 1.53 9.8 26 Empire Machinery Co. Mesa 21.16 110.6 27728 FlipChip International LLC Phoenix 0.28 1.5 4050 General Mills Tempe 0.67 4.1 4173 Glendale Municipal Sanitary Landfill Glendale 1.67 12.9 781 Good Samaritan Regional Medical Ctr. Phoenix 8.24 31.5 1418 Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products Phoenix 1.51 15.4 31565 Henry Products Inc. Phoenix 0.49 3.0 529 Highland Products Inc. Phoenix 1.15 9.2 3536 Holsum Bakery Inc. Phoenix 2.77 21.3 3802 Holsum Bakery Tempe Tempe 0.89 7.1 1059 Honeywell Engines Systems & Service Phoenix 1.99 18.2 355 Honeywell International Inc. Phoenix 20.13 110.6 354 Imsamet of Arizona Goodyear 80.66 460.9 777 Insulfoam Phoenix 0.94 6.0 3966 Intel Corp. Ocotillo Campus (Fab 12 & 22) Chandler 14.69 118.9 983 Isola Laminate Systems Corp. Chandler 9.14 58.6 3317 Kyrene Generating Station Tempe 39.17 18.7 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 16 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.3–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by facility (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO emissions (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) ID # Business name City 3300 Luke Air Force Base Glendale 10.75 86.0 744 M. E. Global Inc. Tempe 56.22 427.1 31261 Madison Granite Supplies Phoenix 14.59 112.3 205 Mail-Well Envelope Phoenix 0.71 3.6 353 Marlam Industries Inc. Phoenix 0.02 0.2 61268 Master Block Inc. El Mirage 0.22 1.4 62 Mastercraft Cabinets Inc. Mesa 0.13 1.6 1414 Mesa Materials Inc. (Mesa) Mesa 16.28 75.1 1415 Mesa Materials Inc. (Phoenix) Phoenix 11.22 51.8 29474 Metal Management Arizona Inc. Phoenix 0.16 1.0 1203 Microchip Technology Inc. Chandler 1.94 10.9 1875 Microchip Technology Inc. Tempe 3.60 20.6 226 Monier Lifetile LLC Phoenix 0.79 5.0 882 Morton Salt Glendale Facility Glendale 3.82 29.4 881 Motorola Inc. Chandler 1.85 24.4 223 MTD Southwest Inc. Chandler 46.12 355.7 693 Munters Corp. Phoenix 0.15 1.1 34197 National Gypsum Co. Phoenix 16.15 103.9 3953 Oakcraft Inc. Peoria 0.07 0.5 52382 Ocotillo Power Plant Tempe 69.05 343.9 733 Pan-Glo West Phoenix 0.63 4.8 1341 Penn Racquet Sports Inc. Phoenix 3.88 30.6 1014 Phoenix Brick Yard Phoenix 34.27 188.3 562 Phoenix Newspapers Inc. Phoenix 0.27 3.9 148 Presto Casting Co. Glendale 0.95 7.3 60889 Purcell's Western States Tire Phoenix 0.15 1.2 1030 Quebecor World Phoenix Division Phoenix 39.99 328.1 537 Red Mountain Mining Inc. Mesa 1.43 11.0 303 Rexam Beverage Can Company Phoenix 4.29 23.6 759 Rogers Corp. Advanced Circuit Materials Chandler 35.74 194.3 1437 Sanmina Phoenix Division Phoenix 1.53 9.8 3315 Santan Generating Station Gilbert 339.66 1,042.9 266 Schuff Steel Co. Phoenix 0.74 4.7 42636 Scottsdale Health Care Hospital Scottsdale 1.38 10.5 4175 SFPP LP Phoenix 8.96 49.2 70634 Shell Oil Phoenix Terminal Phoenix 0.28 1.6 27933 Skunk Creek Landfill Phoenix 0.59 3.2 31627 South Mountain Gin Laveen 0.12 1.6 3316 SRP Agua Fria Glendale 330.15 762.9 4131 ST Microelectronics Phoenix 4.46 24.5 1444 Staco Architectural Roof Tile Phoenix 0.05 0.5 281 Sun State Rock & Materials Sun City 0.73 4.7 101 Sunland Beef Co. Tolleson 10.21 60.1 249 The Boeing Company Mesa 1.50 11.5 232 The Phoenician Resort Scottsdale 9.98 52.8 1102 The Procter & Gamble Mfg Co. Phoenix 0.70 5.4 56 TPAC Division of Kiewit Western Co. Phoenix 0.80 6.2 819 TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. QueenCreek 3.18 20.0 234 United Dairymen of Arizona Tempe 27.51 157.1 260 United Metro Plant #11 Phoenix 16.52 65.0 213 United Metro Plant #12 Glendale 30.45 171.9 403 VAW of America Inc. Phoenix 10.65 68.3 2 Vulcan Materials Co. (El Mirage) El Mirage 2.03 10.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 17 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.3–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by facility (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO emissions (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) ID # Business name City 174 W. R. Meadows of AZ Inc. Goodyear 0.16 2.0 20706 Wincup Holdings Inc. Phoenix 11.19 56.6 72 Woodstuff Manufacturing Inc. Phoenix 0.07 0.5 CO nonattainment area totals: 1,616.64 7,147.9 Facilities outside the CO nonattainment area: 31606 Acme Gin Co. Inc. 1874 Alleco Stone LLC 31643 Allied Waste Industries Inc. 31637 Anderson Clayton Corp. Valencia Gin 1218 Butterfield Station 1389 DaimlerChrysler AZ Proving Grounds 43063 Duke Energy Arlington Valley LLC 1488 Farmers Gin Inc. 10211 Hexcel Corp. 1879 Northwest Regional Landfill 98 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 428 Paloma Gin Properties LLC 289 Phoenix Agro Invest Inc. 42956 Pinnacle West Energy Corp. 10469 SRP Desert Basin Generating Station 398 Wickenburg Facility Total, outside the NAA: Grand total: 2.4 Buckeye Buckeye Buckeye Buckeye Mobile Wittmann Arlington Buckeye Casa Grande Surprise Tonopah Gila Bend Aguila Arlington Casa Grande Wickenburg 0.02 3.89 0.90 0.07 8.25 0.06 23.74 0.13 10.13 1.42 16.13 0.07 0.01 89.70 50.20 1.56 206.27 1,822.90 0.3 24.9 5.8 0.3 45.6 0.3 148.9 2.0 77.9 9.1 88.6 1.0 0.3 461.3 275.8 12.0 1,154.1 8,301.9 Emission reduction credits A major source or major modification planned in a nonattainment area must obtain emissions reductions as a condition for approval. These emissions reductions, generally obtained from existing sources located in the vicinity of a proposed source, must offset the emissions increase from the new source or modification. The obvious purpose of acquiring offsetting emissions decreases is to allow an area to move towards attainment of the national ambient air quality standards while still allowing some industrial growth. Table 2.4–1 provides a list of emission reduction credits for carbon monoxide. Two facilities shut down their equipment prior to 2002 and requested that their emissions continue to be listed in the emission inventory for possible future use as emission reduction credits. A third facility shut down operations in 2002 and received a credit generation certificate for their emissions from the Arizona Emissions Bank. In order for these emission reductions to be available in the future for offsetting, they must be: 1) explicitly included and quantified as growth in projection year inventories required in rate of progress plans or attainment demonstrations that were based on 1990 actual inventories, and 2) meet the requirements outlined in MCESD Rule 240 (Permit Requirements for New Major Sources and Major Modification to Existing Major Sources). Table 2.4–1. CO emission reduction credits. Facility Anderson Clayton Oilseed Plant Motorola (Mesa) The Scottsdale Princess Cogeneration Partnership Total 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory CO emission reduction credits (tons) 2.28 17 12.95 32.23 18 Maricopa County, AZ 2.5 CO point source emissions by process type Table 2.5–1 lists annual and CO season-day emissions from the 113 point sources that reported CO emissions. Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type. CATEGORY Annual CO emissions ID # Business name (tons/yr) ELECTRICITY GENERATION: Fuel Combustion: Fuel Oil: 3313 APS West Phoenix Power Plant 0.00 43063 Duke Energy Arlington Valley LLC † 0.11 3317 Kyrene Generating Station 0.00 98 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 0.00 3316 SRP Agua Fria 0.01 0.13 Total Fuel Combustion: Fuel Oil Fuel Combustion: Natural Gas 3313 APS West Phoenix Power Plant 116.58 43063 Duke Energy Arlington Valley LLC † 23.63 3317 Kyrene Generating Station 39.17 52382 Ocotillo Power Plant 69.05 42956 Pinnacle West Energy Corp. † 89.70 3315 Santan Generating Plant 339.66 3316 SRP Agua Fria 330.13 10469 SRP Desert Basin Generating Station † 50.20 1,058.12 Total Fuel Combustion: Natural Gas TOTAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION: 1,058.25 COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL FUEL COMBUSTION: Fuel Oil: 1074 23rd Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant 1075 91st Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant 4364 Arizona State University 4145 Cave Creek School District 51073 Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. 781 Good Samaritan Regional Medical Ctr. 3300 Luke Air Force Base 42636 Scottsdale Health Care Hospital Total Commercial/Institutional Fuel Oil: Natural Gas: 1074 23rd Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant 4364 Arizona State University 4145 Cave Creek School District 781 Good Samaritan Regional Medical Ctr. 3300 Luke Air Force Base 42636 Scottsdale Health Care Hospital 232 The Phoenician Resort Total Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas: Other Fuels: 3300 Luke Air Force Base TOTAL COMMERCIAL/ INSTITUTIONAL FUEL COMBUSTION: † Source is outside the CO nonattainment area. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 19 Season-day CO emissions (lbs/day) 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.5 429.6 145.4 18.7 343.9 461.3 1,042.9 762.8 275.8 3,480.5 3,484.0 0.03 0.45 0.02 0.05 0.92 4.96 0.71 0.44 7.58 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.5 5.0 13.5 5.5 3.9 41.6 0.76 15.12 3.16 3.28 4.20 0.94 9.98 37.44 7.3 138.7 24.3 18.0 36.9 6.6 52.8 284.7 0.61 3.6 45.63 329.9 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO CATEGORY emissions emissions ID # Business name (tons/yr) (lbs/day) INDUSTRIAL FUEL COMBUSTION: Industrial Fuel Oil: 1874 Alleco Stone LLC † 199 Ameron Intl. Water Transmission Group 3938 Arizona Galvanizing Inc. 1218 Butterfield Station † 1267 Cemex Mesa Plants #61 & #71 26 Empire Machinery Co. 1418 Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products 3966 Intel Corp.-Ocotillo Campus (Fab 12 & 22) 31261 Madison Granite Supplies 1414 Mesa Materials Inc. (Mesa) 1415 Mesa Materials Inc. (Phoenix) 29474 Metal Management Arizona Inc. 1203 Microchip Technology Inc. (Chandler) 1875 Microchip Technology Inc. (Tempe) 882 Morton Salt Glendale Facility 881 Motorola Inc. 34197 National Gypsum Co. 1879 Northwest Regional Landfill 98 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 537 Red Mountain Mining Inc. 266 Schuff Steel Co. 281 Sun State Rock & Materials 260 United Metro Plant #11 213 United Metro Plant #12 2 Vulcan Materials Co. (El Mirage) 398 Wickenburg Facility † Total Industrial Fuel Oil: Industrial Fuel Combustion: Natural Gas 245 A F Lorts Company Inc. 1952 Adesa Phoenix LLC 35541 Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. 199 Ameron Intl. Water Transmission Group 292 Anabolic Laboratories 3938 Arizona Galvanizing Inc. 43124 Bonded Logic Inc. 217 Building Products Co. 1310 Century Graphics LLC 1426 Cesar Color Inc. 1198 Courier Graphics Corp. 4368 Craftsmen in Wood Mfg. 130 Dolphin Inc. 508 Eagle Industries LLC 3305 Earthgrains Baking Companies Inc. 26 Empire Machinery Co. 27728 FlipChip International LLC 4050 General Mills † Source is outside the CO nonattainment area. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 20 3.89 0.18 0.66 0.26 2.14 2.25 0.02 1.16 14.59 16.28 11.22 0.16 0.01 0.02 2.37 0.44 0.06 1.42 14.27 1.43 0.74 0.73 0.16 0.19 1.98 1.56 78.22 24.9 7.1 5.1 1.7 10.4 12.1 0.4 44.6 112.3 75.1 51.8 1.0 0.3 0.9 18.3 17.1 0.8 9.1 78.4 11.0 4.7 4.7 2.1 1.2 10.2 12.0 517.2 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.35 0.12 2.32 0.16 16.73 0.04 0.41 0.20 0.06 1.71 0.02 1.53 18.91 0.28 0.67 0.1 0.0 1.9 3.9 0.9 12.7 1.3 92.3 0.3 3.1 1.4 0.5 12.1 0.2 9.8 98.5 1.5 4.1 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO CATEGORY emissions emissions ID # Business name (tons/yr) (lbs/day) INDUSTRIAL FUEL COMBUSTION: Natural Gas (cont'd.) 1418 Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products 31565 Henry Products Inc. 529 Highland Products Inc. 3536 Holsum Bakery Inc. 3802 Holsum Bakery Tempe 1059 Honeywell Engines Systems & Service 355 Honeywell International Inc. 777 Insulfoam 3966 Intel Corp. Ocotillo Campus (Fab 12 & 22) 983 Isola Laminate Systems Corp. 744 M. E. Global Inc. 205 Mail-Well Envelope 353 Marlam Industries Inc. 61268 Master Block Inc. 62 Mastercraft Cabinets Inc. 1203 Microchip Technology Inc. (Chandler) 1875 Microchip Technology Inc. (Tempe) 226 Monier Lifetile LLC 882 Morton Salt Glendale Facility 881 Motorola Inc. 223 MTD Southwest Inc. 693 Munters Corp. 34197 National Gypsum Co. 3953 Oakcraft Inc. 428 Paloma Gin Properties LLC 733 Pan-Glo West 1341 Penn Racquet Sports Inc. 289 Phoenix Agro Invest Inc. 1014 Phoenix Brick Yard 562 Phoenix Newspapers Inc. 148 Presto Casting Co. 60889 Purcell's Western States Tire 1030 Quebecor World Phoenix Division 303 Rexam Beverage Can Company 759 Rogers Corp. Advanced Circuit Materials 1437 Sanmina Phoenix Division 70634 Shell Oil Phoenix Terminal 31627 South Mountain Gin 4131 ST Microelectronics 1444 Staco Architectural Roof Tile 101 Sunland Beef Co. 249 The Boeing Company 1102 The Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. 56 TPAC Division of Kiewit Western Co. 819 TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. 234 United Dairymen of Arizona 260 United Metro Plant #11 213 United Metro Plant #12 403 VAW of America Inc. † Source is outside the CO nonattainment area. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 21 0.38 0.49 1.15 2.77 0.89 0.80 3.76 0.94 13.53 9.14 3.99 0.71 0.02 0.22 0.13 1.93 3.52 0.79 0.57 1.40 0.08 0.15 16.09 0.07 0.07 0.63 3.88 0.01 34.27 0.27 0.95 0.15 39.99 4.29 35.74 1.53 0.28 0.12 4.46 0.05 10.21 1.05 0.70 0.80 2.77 27.51 16.36 30.25 8.03 7.0 3.0 9.2 21.3 7.1 10.5 20.6 6.0 74.3 58.6 26.0 3.6 0.2 1.4 1.6 10.6 19.3 5.0 4.4 7.3 1.6 1.1 103.1 0.5 1.0 4.8 30.6 0.3 188.3 3.9 7.3 1.2 328.1 23.6 194.3 9.8 1.6 1.6 24.5 0.5 60.1 8.1 5.4 6.2 17.0 157.1 62.9 170.7 51.5 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO CATEGORY emissions emissions ID # Business name (tons/yr) (lbs/day) INDUSTRIAL FUEL COMBUSTION: Natural Gas (cont'd.) 2 Vulcan Materials Co. (El Mirage) 174 W. R. Meadows of AZ Inc. 20706 Wincup Holdings Inc. 72 Woodstuff Manufacturing Inc. Total: Industrial Fuel Combustion: Natural Gas Industrial Fuel Combustion: Other 31606 Acme Gin Co. Inc. † 31643 Allied Waste Industries Inc. † 31637 Anderson Clayton Corp. Valencia Gin † 3976 Cholla Custom Cabinets Inc. 1389 DaimlerChrysler AZ Proving Grounds † 1488 Farmers Gin Inc. † 1418 Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products 882 Morton Salt Glendale Facility 98 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Total: Industrial Fuel Combustion: Other TOTAL: ALL INDUSTRIAL FUEL COMBUSTION: INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES: Engine Testing: 1059 Honeywell Engines Systems & Service 355 Honeywell International Inc. 3300 Luke Air Force Base 223 MTD Southwest Inc. 249 The Boeing Company Total Engine Testing: Other: 3442 Caljet 4175 SFPP LP 249 The Boeing Company Total Other Industrial Processes: TOTAL: ALL INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES MANUFACTURING PROCESSES: Electrical Equipment: 1875 Microchip Technology Inc. Fabricated Metal Products: 10211 Hexcel Corp. Secondary Metal Products: 354 Imsamet of Arizona 744 M. E. Global Inc. 403 VAW of America Inc. Total: Manufacturing: Secondary Metal Products: Other: 819 TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. TOTAL: ALL MANUFACTURING: † Source is outside the CO nonattainment area. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 22 0.05 0.16 11.19 0.07 343.21 0.2 2.0 56.6 0.5 2,068.0 0.02 0.90 0.07 0.01 0.06 0.13 1.10 0.87 1.85 5.01 426.44 0.3 5.8 0.3 0.1 0.3 2.0 8.0 6.7 10.2 33.7 2,618.9 1.19 16.37 5.12 46.04 0.29 69.01 7.6 90.0 39.4 354.1 2.3 493.3 4.30 8.62 0.15 13.06 82.07 23.6 47.3 1.2 72.1 565.5 0.06 0.3 10.13 77.9 80.66 52.24 2.62 135.51 460.9 401.1 16.8 878.7 0.41 146.12 2.9 959.9 Maricopa County, AZ Table 2.5–1. Annual and CO season-day point source emissions, by process type (continued). Annual CO Season-day CO CATEGORY emissions emissions ID # Business name (tons/yr) (lbs/day) WASTE DISPOSAL: Landfills: 1218 Butterfield Station † 4173 Glendale Municipal Sanitary Landfill 27933 Skunk Creek Landfill Total: Landfills Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs): 1074 23rd Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant 1075 91st Ave. Wastewater Treatment Plant Total: POTWs Site Remediation: 3300 Luke Air Force Base 4175 SFPP LP Total Site Remediation: TOTAL: ALL WASTE DISPOSAL: TOTAL: ALL POINT SOURCES: † = Point source is outside the CO nonattainment area. 2.6 7.98 1.67 0.59 10.24 43.9 12.9 3.2 59.9 50.12 3.58 53.70 251.4 29.9 281.3 0.11 0.34 0.45 64.40 0.6 1.9 2.5 343.7 1,822.90 8,301.9 Summary of point source emissions Table 2.6–1 provides an overview of source category contributions to total point source emissions. Table 2.6–1. Summary of annual and season-day point source emissions, by source category. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Electricity generation 1,058.25 3,484.0 894.61 2,598.0 Commercial/institutional fuel combustion 45.63 329.9 45.63 329.9 Industrial fuel combustion 426.44 2,618.9 401.93 2,472.6 Industrial processes 82.07 565.5 82.07 565.5 Manufacturing processes 146.12 959.9 135.99 882.0 Waste disposal 64.40 343.7 56.41 299.9 All point sources: 1,822.90 8,301.9 1,616.64 7,147.9 2.7 Quality assurance / quality control procedures 2.7.1 Emission survey preparation and data collection The MCESD's Emissions Inventory (EI) Unit annually collects point source criteria pollutant emission data from sources in the county. MCESD annually reviews EPA guidance, documents from the Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP), and other source materials to ensure that the most current emission factors and emission calculation methods are used for each year's survey. Each January, the EI Unit prepares a pre-populated hard copy of the preceding year’s submissions and mails reporting forms to permitted sources, along with detailed instructions for completing the forms. (A copy of these instructions is included as Appendix 2.1). The EI Unit 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 23 Maricopa County, AZ asks sources to verify and update the data. The EI Unit also holds weekly workshops from January through April to assist businesses in completing EI forms. The general data flow for data collection and inventory preparation is shown in Figure 2.7–1. Figure 2.7–1. Data flow for annual point source emission inventory reporting. EI Reporting Forms • Hard Copy Forms/ Instructions • Instruction on Web EI Reporting Forms Log In EI reports/ Issue Receipts Data Entry EMS Issue NOVs for late submitters • • • Code/field check Range checks Referential value checks Create Inventory files Automated QA checks Technical QA/ QC Using completed survey data Finalized Inventory Data Reconciliation 2.7.2 Submission processing Submitted EI reports are logged in as they are received, and receipts are issued for emissions fees paid. The data are input “as received” into the department's data base. During data entry, numerous automated quality control (QC) checks are performed, including: • • • • • pull-down menus to minimize data entry errors (e.g., city, pollutant, emission factor unit, etc.) mandatory data field requirement checks (e.g., a warning screen appears if a user tries to save an emission record with a missing emission factor). range checks (e.g., were valid SCC, Tier, SIC, and NAICS codes entered?) referential value checks (e.g., emission factor units, annual throughput units) automatic formatting of date, time, telephone number fields, etc. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 24 Maricopa County, AZ Automated quality assurance (QA) checks on the report that has been entered include the following: • • • • Comparing reported emission factors to SCC reference lists Comparing reported emission factors to material name reference list Checking the report for calculation errors. This includes annual throughput, emission factors, unit conversion factors (e.g., BTU to therms), capture efficiency, primary / secondary control device efficiency, and any offsite recycling credits claimed. Checking the report for completeness of required data. When data entry is complete, an electronic version of the original data is preserved separately to document changes made during the technical review and QA/QC process. When errors are flagged, the businesses are contacted and correct information is obtained and input to the EMS. Outstanding reporting issues are documented. Confidential business information (CBI) is identified by a checkbox on the form, and these data elements are flagged during data entry and are not transmitted to the EPA. To prepare the inventory for submittal to the National Emissions Inventory (NEI), the EI Unit runs Microsoft Access queries on the data in the EMS to pull fields for the NEI Input format (NIF) tables. 2.7.3 Analysis of annual point source emissions data for this inventory Two environmental planners checked inventory accuracy and reasonableness, and assured that all point sources had been identified and that the methodology applied to calculate emissions was appropriate and that the calculations were correct. Other reasonableness checks were conducted by recalculating emissions using methods other than those used to make the initial emissions calculations and then comparing results. QA was conducted by checking all emissions reports submitted to MCESD for the year 2002 for missing and questionable data and by checking the accuracy and reasonableness of all emissions calculations made for such reports. Notes concerning follow-up calls and corrections to calculations were documented on each 2002 annual emissions report. The QA point source coordinator reviewed checked calculations, identified errors, and performed completeness, reasonableness and accuracy checks. 2.8 References US EPA, 2003. 2002 National Emission Inventory (NEI) Preparation Plan (draft). USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Dec. 19, 2003. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 25 Maricopa County, AZ 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 26 Maricopa County, AZ 3. Area Sources 3.1 Scope and methodology This chapter considers all stationary sources which are too small or too numerous to be treated as point sources. EPA guidance documents, including “Introduction to Area Source Inventory Development” (US EPA, 2001) as well as permit and emissions data in the MCESD’s Environmental Management System (EMS) database, and previous SIP inventories, were evaluated to develop the list of area source categories for inclusion. Some source categories were deemed “insignificant” because there are no large production facilities and/or very few small sources, and therefore emissions were not quantified. MCESD prepared the area source emission estimates for all area sources and provided quality assurance checks on all data. Table 3.1–1 contains a list of all area source categories, with Source Classification Codes (SCCs), addressed in this chapter. Table 3.1–1. List of area source categories. AMS code Area source description Fuel combustion: 2102006000 Industrial natural gas 2102004000 Industrial fuel oil 2103006000 Commercial/institutional natural gas 2103004000 Commercial/institutional fuel oil 2104006000 Residential natural gas 2104008000 Residential wood 2104004000 Residential fuel oil Section 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 3.2.6 3.2.7 2301000000 2302002000 n/a 2399000000 Industrial processes: Chemical manufacturing Commercial cooking State-permitted portable sources Industrial processes not elsewhere classified 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 2601000000 2610000000 2620000000 Waste treatment and disposal: On-site incineration Open burning Landfills 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 2810001000 2810030000 2810050000 2810040000 2601020000 2830000000 Miscellaneous area sources: Wildfires and brush fires Structure fires Vehicle fires Engine testing Health services (crematories) Accidental releases 3.5.1.1 3.5.1.2 3.5.1.3 3.5.1.4 3.5.2 3.5.3 For nearly all categories, emissions were calculated in one of the following ways: • emissions estimates for some categories were developed by conducting surveys on local usage (e.g., natural gas consumption, pesticide usage) or derived from state-wide data (e.g., fuel oil use). • for some widespread or diverse categories (e.g., consumer solvent use), emissions were calculated using published per-capita or per-employee emission factors. • for source categories with some information available from annual emissions reports (e.g., bakeries), these data were combined with employment data to “scale up” reported emissions to reflect the entire source category. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 27 Maricopa County, AZ • for those source categories with detailed emissions data available from most or all significant sources in the category, emissions were calculated based on detailed process and operational data provided by these sources. The specific emissions estimation methodologies used for each source category (including any application of rule effectiveness) are described in greater detail in the respective sections. 3.2 Fuel combustion Area source emissions for the following seven categories of fuel consumption were calculated: Industrial natural gas, industrial fuel oil, commercial/institutional natural gas, commercial institutional fuel oil, residential natural gas, residential wood, and residential fuel oil. Data for emissions calculations from natural gas combustion came from a survey of the four natural gas suppliers in Maricopa County. The following table summarizes the natural gas sales data received from Maricopa County natural gas suppliers. Table 3.2–1. Natural gas sales data from Maricopa County natural gas suppliers. Sales by end user category (in MMCF/yr) Natural gas Electric Commercial/ supplier Utilities Institutional Industrial Residential Transport* Southwest Gas n/a 3,092.760 13,774.986 14,842.508 3,802.155 City of Mesa 80.169 386.692 1,486.877 1,112.936 59.924 El Paso 58,334.169 161.429 n/a n/a n/a Black Mountain n/a n/a 142.561 464.084 n/a * For emissions calculations, sales from these two categories were grouped with industrial sales. Other* 1,977.644 n/a n/a n/a Area source emissions for wood and fuel oil combustion were calculated from Arizona statelevel sales and consumption data as described in the following subsections. Area source emissions from coal and liquid petroleum gas were not calculated as emissions from these categories were determined to be insignificant. 3.2.1 Industrial natural gas All natural gas suppliers in Maricopa County were surveyed to gather information on the volume of natural gas distributed, by user category, within the county in 2002. Area source industrial natural gas usage for the county is based on the reported total volume of natural gas sold to industrial sources, minus natural gas used by industrial point sources: Area source industrial natural gas usage = Reported industrial natural gas sales = 9,480.60 MMCF = 1,551.23 MMCF – Industrial point source natural gas usage – 7,929.38 MMCF Natural gas is used for both external combustion (boilers, heaters) and internal combustion (generators), each of which have different emission factors. Thus the area source natural gas usage derived above must be apportioned between these two categories. This apportionment was based on the percentages of external and internal natural gas combustion reported by all industrial area sources in 2002. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 28 Maricopa County, AZ Annual emissions for the county are calculated by multiplying natural gas usage by the respective AP-42 emission factors for external and internal combustion, as in this example for CO emissions from external natural gas combustion: Annual CO emissions = External industrial natural × CO emission factor for ÷ 2,000 lb/ton from external natural gas gas usage (MMCF) external natural gas comcombustion bustion (lb/MMCF) = 1,527.09 × 84 ÷ 2,000 = 64.14 tons CO/yr Table 3.2–2. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source industrial natural gas combustion, by combustion type. % of Annual natural gas CO emission factor Annual emissions Combustion type total usage (MMCF) (lbs/MMCF) (tons/yr) External 98.44 1,527.09 84 64.14 Internal 1.56 24.14 399 4.82 Totals: 100.00 1,551.23 68.95 Season-day emissions for the county are calculated by first multiplying annual emissions by the percentage of industrial natural gas sold used during the CO season. (Figures reported by natural gas suppliers for the December–February time period are assumed to be representative for the November–January CO season.) CO season emission totals are then divided by the number of days that activity occurs during the CO season: Season-day CO = Annual CO × % natural gas sold emissions from emissions (tons/yr) during CO season industrial natural gas = 68.95 × 28.59 % = 505.5 lbs/day ÷ (days/week × wks/season) × 2,000 lbs/ton ÷ (6 × 13) × 2,000 Annual and season-day emissions within the CO nonattainment area are calculated by applying the ratio of industrial employment in the nonattainment area to county-level emission calculations. (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the employment data used). Emissions from area source industrial natural gas combustion in the CO NAA = Annual county CO emissions (tons/yr) × Industrial employment ratio = 68.95 = 67.64 tons CO/yr × 0.9809 Table 3.2–3. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source industrial natural gas combustion. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 68.95 505.5 CO NAA 67.64 495.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 29 Maricopa County, AZ 3.2.2 Industrial fuel oil Area source emissions from industrial fuel oil combustion are calculated by a multi-step process which allocates Arizona state-level industrial fuel oil sales data from the US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (US DOE, 2002b) to Maricopa County. To derive industrial fuel oil usage in Maricopa County, reported Arizona sales of high-sulfur diesel for 2002 are first subtracted from Arizona state-level total industrial fuel oil sales, as it is presumed that no high-sulfur diesel fuel is used in Maricopa County due to local air quality regulations and market conditions. State industrial fuel oil sales other than high-sulfur diesel (in thousand gallons, or Mgal) = Reported state total – Reported state high-sulfur diesel sales industrial fuel oil sales = 61,748 Mgal – 34,076 Mgal = 27,672 Mgal/yr Arizona state industrial fuel oil sales (less high-sulfur diesel fuel) are then multiplied by the ratio of industrial employment in Maricopa County to Arizona state (0.71), as determined from data from the US Census (2003a) to estimate annual Maricopa County industrial fuel oil sales, as follows: Maricopa County = Arizona industrial fuel oil industrial fuel oil sales sales less high-sulfur diesel = 27,672 Mgal = 19,647.12 Mgal/yr × Maricopa County:state industrial employment ratio × 0.71 To avoid double-counting, industrial fuel oil use attributable to stationary point sources (addressed in Chapter 2) and nonroad mobile sources (addressed in Chapter 4) are subtracted from County industrial fuel oil sales to estimate county fuel oil usage by area sources, as follows: Maricopa County industrial = Maricopa County – Fuel oil used by industrial – Fuel oil used by industrial area source fuel oil sales industrial fuel oil sales nonroad mobile equipment stationary point sources = 19,647.12 Mgal – 7,365.927 Mgal – 2,021.10 Mgal = 10,260.097 Mgal/yr Industrial fuel oil is used for both external combustion (boilers, heaters) and internal combustion (generators), each of which have different emission factors. Thus the area source industrial fuel oil sales derived above must be apportioned between these two categories. This apportionment was based on the percentages of external and internal fuel oil combustion reported by all industrial area sources surveyed by MCESD in 2002 (shown in Table 3.2–4 below). County-level annual emissions from this area source category were calculated by multiplying industrial fuel oil sales by the respective AP-42 emission factors for external and internal combustion, as in this example for CO emissions from external industrial fuel oil combustion: Annual CO emissions = External industrial fuel from external industrial oil sales (Mgal) fuel oil combustion = 8,003.949 = 20.01 tons CO/yr 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory × CO emission factor for external ÷ 2,000 lb/ton fuel oil combustion (lb/Mgal) × 5 30 ÷ 2,000 Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.2–4. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source industrial fuel oil combustion, by combustion type. % of Annual fuel oil CO emission Annual emissions Combustion type total sales (Mgals) factor (lbs/Mgals) (tons/yr) External 78.01 8,003.949 5 20.01 Internal 21.99 2,256.147 130 146.65 Totals: 100.00 10,260.097 166.66 Season-day emissions for the county are calculated by first multiplying annual emissions by 25% to estimate CO season emission totals. CO season emission totals are then divided by the number of days that activity occurs during the CO season, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2001a): CO season-day emissions from industrial fuel oil = Annual CO × % fuel oil sold ÷ (days/week × wks/season) × 2,000 lbs/ton emissions (tons/yr) during CO season = 166.66 = 1,068.3 lbs/day × 25 % ÷ (6 × 13) × 2,000 Annual and season-day emissions in the CO nonattainment area are calculated by applying the ratio of industrial employment in the nonattainment area to county-level emission calculations. (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the employment data used). CO NAA emissions from area source industrial fuel oil combustion = Annual county CO emissions (tons/yr) = 166.66 tons/yr = 163.48 tons CO/yr × NAA:County industrial employment ratio × 0.9809 Table 3.2–5. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source industrial fuel oil combustion. Annual emissions Season-day (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Geographic area Maricopa County 166.66 1,068.3 CO NAA 163.48 1,047.9 3.2.3 Commercial/institutional natural gas All natural gas suppliers in Maricopa County were surveyed to gather information on the volume of natural gas distributed, by user category, within the county in 2002. Area source commercial and institutional (C&I) natural gas usage for the county is based on the reported total volume of natural gas sold to C&I sources, minus natural gas used by C&I point sources: County area source C&I natural gas usage = Reported C&I natural gas sales = 15,404.42 MMCF = 14,679.07 MMCF – C&I point source natural gas usage – 725.35 MMCF Natural gas is used for both external combustions (boilers, heaters) and internal combustion (generators), each of which have different emission factors. Thus the area source natural gas usage derived above must be apportioned between these two categories. This apportionment was based on the percentages of external and internal natural gas combustion reported by all C&I area sources in 2002. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 31 Maricopa County, AZ Annual emissions for the county and the CO nonattainment area are calculated by multiplying natural gas usage by the respective AP-42 emission factors for external and internal combustion, as in this example for CO emissions from external natural gas combustion: Annual CO emissions = External C&I natural from external natural gas gas usage (MMCF) combustion = 14,434.79 = 606.26 tons CO/yr × CO emission factor for ÷ 2,000 lb/ton external natural gas combustion (lb/MMCF) × 84 ÷ 2,000 Table 3.2–6. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source commercial/institutional natural gas combustion, by combustion type. % of Annual natural gas CO emission factor Annual emissions Combustion type total usage (MMCF) (lbs/MMCF) (tons/yr) External 98.34 14,434.79 84 606.26 Internal 1.66 244.29 399 48.74 Totals: 100.00 14,679.07 655.00 Season-day emissions for the county are calculated by first multiplying annual emissions by the percentage of C&I natural gas sold used during the CO season. (Figures reported by natural gas suppliers for the December–February time period are assumed to be representative for the November–January CO season.) CO season emission totals are then divided by the number of days that activity occurs during the CO season: Season-day CO emissions from C&I natural gas = Annual CO × % natural gas sold emissions (tons/yr) during CO season ÷ (days/week × wks/season) × 2,000 lbs/ton = 655.00 = 5,594.0 lbs/day ÷ (6 × 13) × 33.31 % × 2000 Annual and season-day emissions in the CO nonattainment area are calculated by applying the combined ratio of retail, office, public and other employment in the nonattainment area to county-level emission calculations. (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the employment data used). Emissions from area source C&I natural gas combustion in the CO NAA = Annual county CO emissions (tons/yr) × NAA:County C&I employment ratio = 655.00 = 643.80 tons CO/yr × 0.9829 Table 3.2–7. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source commercial/institutional natural gas combustion. Annual emissions Season-day emissions (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Geographic area Maricopa County 655.00 5,594.0 CO NAA 643.80 5,498.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 32 Maricopa County, AZ 3.2.4 Commercial/institutional fuel oil Area source emissions from commercial and institutional (C&I) fuel oil combustion are calculated by a multi-step process of allocating Arizona state-level C&I fuel oil sales as reported by the US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (US DOE, 2002a) to Maricopa County. To derive commercial/institutional fuel oil usage in Maricopa County, reported Arizona statelevel sales of high-sulfur diesel for 2002 are first subtracted from Arizona state-level total commercial/institutional fuel oil sales, as it is presumed that no high-sulfur diesel fuel is used in Maricopa County due to local clean air act requirements and market conditions. State C&I fuel oil sales other than high-sulfur diesel (in thousand gallons, or Mgal) = Reported state total C&I fuel oil sales = 30,077 Mgal = 30,006 Mgal/yr – Reported state high-sulfur diesel sales – 71 Mgal Arizona state commercial/institutional fuel oil sales less high-sulfur diesel are then multiplied by the ratio of C&I employment in Maricopa County to Arizona state (0.71), as determined by data from the US Census (2003a), to estimate Maricopa County-level C&I fuel oil sales, as follows: Maricopa County C&I fuel oil sales = Arizona C&I fuel oil sales less high-sulfur diesel = 30,006 Mgal = 21,304.26 Mgal/yr × Maricopa County:state C&I employment ratio × 0.71 To avoid double-counting, commercial/institutional fuel oil use attributable to stationary point sources (addressed in Chapter 2) and nonroad mobile sources (addressed in Chapter 4) are subtracted from County C&I fuel oil sales to estimate county fuel oil usage used by C&I area sources, as follows: Maricopa County C&I area source fuel oil sales = Maricopa County – Fuel oil used by C&I – Fuel oil used by C&I C&I fuel oil sales nonroad mobile equipment stationary point sources = 21,304.26 Mgal – 4,435.974 Mgal – 190.672 Mgal = 16,677.614 Mgal/yr Fuel oil is used for both external combustion (boilers, heaters) and internal combustion (generators), each of which have different emission factors. Thus the area source C&I fuel oil sales derived above must be apportioned between these two categories. This apportionment was based on the percentages of external and internal fuel oil combustion reported by all commercial/institutional area sources surveyed by MCESD in 2002 (shown in Table 3.2–8 below). Annual emissions for the county are calculated by multiplying C&I fuel oil sales by the respective AP-42 emission factors for external and internal combustion, as in this example for CO emissions from external C&I fuel oil combustion: 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 33 Maricopa County, AZ Annual CO emissions from external C&I fuel oil combustion = External C&I fuel oil sales (Mgal) × CO emission factor for external fuel oil combustion (lb/Mgal) ÷ 2,000 lb/ton = 11,165.542 = 27.91 tons CO/yr × 5 ÷ 2,000 Table 3.2–8. Emission factors and annual emissions from area-source commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion, by combustion type. % of Annual fuel oil CO emission Annual emissions total sales (Mgals) factor (lbs/Mgals) (tons/yr) Combustion type External 66.95 11,165.542 5 27.91 Internal 33.05 5,512.072 130 358.28 Totals: 100.00 16,677.614 386.20 Season-day emissions for the county are calculated by first multiplying annual emissions by 35% to estimate CO season emission totals. CO season emission totals are then divided by the number of days that activity occurs during the CO season as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2001a): CO season-day emissions from C&I fuel oil use = Annual CO × % fuel oil sold ÷ (days/week × wks/season) × 2,000 lbs/ton emissions (tons/yr) during CO season = 386.20 = 3,465.9 lbs/day × 35 % ÷ (6 × 13) × 2,000 Annual and season-day emissions within the CO nonattainment area are calculated by applying the combined ratio of retail, office, public and other employment in the nonattainment area to county-level emission calculations. (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the employment data used). CO NAA emissions from area source C&I fuel oil combustion = Annual county CO emissions (tons/yr) = 386.20 = 379.59 tons CO/yr × NAA:County C&I employment ratio × 0.9829 Table 3.2–9. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion. Annual emissions Season-day Geographic area (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa County 386.20 3,465.9 CO NAA 379.59 3,406.6 3.2.5 Residential natural gas All natural gas suppliers in Maricopa County were surveyed to gather information on the volume of natural gas sold, by user category, within the county. Annual emissions from residential natural gas combustion emissions were calculated by multiplying residential natural gas sales by emission factors for residential natural gas combustion listed in AP-42 Tables 1.4-1 and 1.4-2 (US EPA, 1998), as follows: 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 34 Maricopa County, AZ Annual emissions from = Residential natural residential natural gas gas annual sales combustion (MMCF) = 16,419.53 = 328.39 tons CO/yr × Residential natural gas emission factor for CO (lbs/MMCF) × 40 ÷ 2,000 lbs/ton ÷ 2,000 lbs/ton CO season-day emissions are calculated by first multiplying reported natural gas usage during the CO season (5,989.84 MMCF) by the emission factor for CO for residential natural gas combustion to produce CO season emissions (natural gas usage reported for the months of December-February are assumed to represent CO season usage). CO season emissions are then divided by the number of days during the CO season that residential natural gas combustion occurs (US EPA, 2001a). Season-day emissions = Residential natural × Residential natural gas from residential natural gas seasonal sales emission factor for CO gas combustion (MMCF) (lbs/MMCF) = 5,989.84 × 40 = 2,632.9 lbs CO/day ÷ (days/week × weeks/season) ÷ (7 × 13) Annual and season-day residential natural gas emissions in the CO nonattainment area are calculated by multiplying county-level emissions by the percentage of total occupied households (98.18%) in the CO nonattainment area as follows: Annual emissions from residential natural gas combustion in the NAA = County annual emissions × Percentage of occupied households in the NAA = 328.39 tons/yr = 322.41 tons CO/yr × 98.18% Table 3.2–10. Annual and season-day emissions from residential natural gas combustion. Annual emissions CO season-day Geographic area (tons/year) emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa County 328.39 2,632.9 CO NAA 322.41 2,585.0 3.2.6 Residential wood combustion Area source emissions from residential wood combustion are calculated based on the amount of wood burned in fireplaces and woodstoves in Maricopa County, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2001b). Residential wood combustion in the county is estimated by multiplying data on statewide residential wood combustion usage from the US Department of Energy (2003) by the ratio of county to state households that report use of wood for heating from the US Census Bureau (2003c). The latest available data on residential wood use for household heating from the US Census Bureau is for the calendar year 2000. Since all fireplaces in homes constructed since 1999 are required by Arizona statute to be clean-burning, it is assumed that these new homes have negligible emissions. Thus, year 2000 data is assumed to be representative of 2002 emissions. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 35 Maricopa County, AZ Maricopa County residential = Arizona residential × Ratio of county:state households wood usage (cords/yr) wood usage (cords/yr) using wood for heat = 491,000 × 1,655 / 39,842 = 20,396 cords/yr To calculate emissions, the amount of wood used is converted to tons by multiplying cords by the number of cubic feet of wood in a cord and by the density of the wood used (US EPA, 2001b). Wood density is determined by weighted average of types of wood used for residential combustion in Maricopa County, provided by the US Forest Service (USFS, 1993). County residential = County wood × avg. ft3 wood/cord × Wood density (lbs/ ft3) ÷ 2,000 lbs/ton wood usage (tons/yr) usage (cords) = 20,396 × 79 × 31.57 ÷ 2,000 = 25,433.73 tons Annual emissions from residential wood combustion are calculated by multiplying the tons of wood used by the CO emission factor for residential total woodstoves and fireplaces from EIIP Volume III, Chap. 2, Table 2.4-1 (US EPA, 2001b): Annual CO emissions from resid- = Residential × CO emission factor (lbs/ton) ential wood combustion (tons/yr) wood usage (tons) = 25,433.73 × 252.6 = 3,212.28 tons CO/yr ÷ 2,000 lbs/ton ÷ 2,000 Following EIIP guidance, season-day CO emissions are calculated by apportioning wood burning activity based on heating degree days (i.e., the number of degrees per day that the daily average temperature is below 65°F). Data provided by Arizona State University (2003) indicated that there were a total of 776 heating degree days in Phoenix during 2002, with 586 heating degrees days reported during the CO season. By applying the ratio of CO season heating degree days to annual heating degree days, CO season-day emissions are calculated as follows: Season-day CO emissions = Annual emissions × Heating degree days × 2,000 lbs/ton ÷ CO season-days/yr from residential wood (tons/yr) (ratio) combustion (lbs/day) = 3,212.28 × (586 / 776) × 2,000 ÷ 91 = 53,313.6 lbs/day Annual and season-day emissions within the CO nonattainment area (NAA) are calculated by multiplying county totals by the ratio of total occupied housing units inside the nonattainment area (1,337,099) to total residential housing units in the county (1,361,837). See Section 1.5.1 for a further discussion of the housing data used. NAA annual emissions = County annual emissions from residential wood (tons/yr) combustion (tons/yr) = 3,212.28 = 3,153.82 tons/yr 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory × NAA:county residential housing ratio × 0.9818 36 Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.2–11. Annual and season-day emissions from residential wood combustion. Annual emissions Season-day emissions (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Geographic area Maricopa County 3,212.28 53,313.6 CO NAA 3,153.82 52,343.3 3.2.7 Residential fuel oil Emissions from residential fuel oil use were calculated using an approach similar to that used for residential wood combustion described in Section 3.2.6. County-level residential fuel oil use was derived from statewide totals using the ratio of county to state households that report fuel oil use from the US Census Bureau (2003b): Maricopa County residential = Arizona residential × Ratio of county:state households fuel oil usage (Mgal/yr) fuel oil use (Mgal/yr) reporting fuel oil use = 340 × 490 / 1,813 = 91.89 Mgal/yr An AP-42 emission factor of 5 lbs CO/Mgal, and data on heating degree days and residential housing units described in Section 3.2.6, were used to calculate annual and daily CO emissions shown in Table 3.2–12. Table 3.2–12. Annual and season-day emissions from residential fuel oil combustion. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 0.23 3.8 CO NAA 0.23 3.7 3.2.8 Summary of all area-source fuel combustion Table 3.2–13. Summary of annual and season-day area source fuel combustion. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Industrial natural gas 68.95 505.5 67.64 495.9 Industrial fuel oil 166.66 1,068.3 163.48 1,047.9 Commercial/institutional natural gas 655.00 5,594.0 643.80 5,498.4 Commercial/institutional fuel oil 386.20 3,465.9 379.59 3,406.6 Residential natural gas 328.39 2,632.9 322.41 2,585.0 Residential wood 3,212.28 53,313.6 3,153.82 52,343.3 Residential fuel oil 0.23 3.8 0.23 3.7 Totals: 4,817.71 66,584.1 4,730.96 65,380.8 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 37 Maricopa County, AZ 3.3 Industrial processes 3.3.1 Chemical manufacturing Emissions from area-source chemical manufacturing were calculated by the “scaling up” method as described in EPA emission inventory guidance (US EPA, 2001a). This method combines detailed emissions data from a subset of sources, and county-level employment data from the US Census Bureau (2003b) to develop a per-employee emission factor that is then used to estimate emissions from all sources in an industry category. The most recent data from the US Census’ County Business Patterns (CBP) for 2001 employment, were used. Where CBP employment estimates were presented as a range, the midpoint values was chosen for these calculations. Table 3.3–1 shows the NAICS codes and employment data used to calculate emissions from chemical manufacturing. Table 3.3–1. NAICS codes and descriptions for chemical manufacturing. NAICS US Census Code Description employment data 32551 Paint & coating manufacturing 100–249 32591 Printing ink manufacturing 20–99 422910 Farm supplies, wholesale 298 325991 Custom compounding of purchased resin 100–249 325998 All other misc. chemical product & prep. manufacturing 316 325188 All other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing 100–249 325412 Pharmaceutical manufacturing 500–999 Total: Value used 175 60 298 175 316 175 750 1,949 Some facilities in this category are considered point sources, and have been addressed in Chapter 2. To avoid double-counting, employment at point sources is subtracted from total employment as follows: Total area-source employment in chemical mfg. = Total employment (from US – Employment at point sources Census’ County Business Patterns) (from annual emission reports) = 1,949 – 191 = 1,758 employees This area-source employment estimate is used to “scale up” emissions reported from those facilities surveyed in 2002 as follows: Total area-source = Emissions from surveyed area sources × Total area-source employment emissions Employment at surveyed area sources Area-source CO emissions from chemical mfg. = 0.03 tons/yr 744 employees × 1,758 employees = 0.07 tons CO/yr CO season-day emissions are calculated based on the operating schedule data reported by chemical manufacturing facilities. From annual emission surveys, the modal values were identified for two items: days/week and seasonal activity as a percentage of annual activity. This data was used to calculate typical season-day emissions as follows: 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 38 Maricopa County, AZ Season-day CO emissions from chemical mfg. = Annual emissions (tons/yr) × season % Days/week × Weeks/season × 2,000 lbs ton = × 2,000 = 0.07 × 25% 5 × 13 0.5 lbs CO/day Annual and season-day emissions for the CO nonattainment area were calculated by multiplying the Maricopa County emission totals by the percentage industrial employment within the nonattainment area. (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the employment data used.) CO emissions from area-source chemical mfg. in the CO NAA (tons/yr) = Annual Maricopa County emissions × NAA:county ratio of industrial employment = 0.07 tons/yr × 98.09% = 0.07 tons CO/yr Table 3.3–2 summarizes annual and season-day emissions from chemical manufacturing in both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Table 3.3–2. Annual and season-day emissions from area-source chemical manufacturing. Annual CO emissions Season-day CO emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 0.07 0.5 CO NAA 0.07 0.5 3.3.2 Commercial cooking Emissions from commercial cooking were estimated for five source categories based on equipment type. These equipment types include: chain-driven (conveyorized) charbroilers (SCC 2302002100), under-fired charbroilers (2302002200), flat griddles (2302003100), clamshell griddles (2302003200), and deep-fat fryers (2302003000). Emission inventory methods outlined in EPA guidance (US EPA, 2004) for these source categories include emissions from all meat types (hamburger, steak, fish, pork, and chicken) and five restaurant types (ethnic, fast food, family, seafood, and steak & barbeque). Data obtained from MCESD’s eating and drinking establishments permit database indicated that 9,038 restaurants operated in Maricopa County in 2002. The percent of restaurants in Maricopa County for the five restaurant types was obtained from a commercial business database (Harris InfoSource, 2003). The percent of restaurants for each restaurant type was multiplied by the total number of restaurants operated in Maricopa County in 2002 to derive the number of restaurants for each restaurant type as shown in Table 3.3–3. Using the number of restaurants for each restaurant type, along with the default emission factors and equations from US EPA (2004), emissions for each combination of equipment type, restaurant type, and meat type were calculated, and the results were summed to estimate annual emissions for each type of cooking equipment, as shown in Table 3.3–4. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 39 Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.3–3. Maricopa County restaurants, by type. Restaurant category Percentage # of restaurants Ethnic food 14.47 1,308 Fast food 15.35 329 Family 3.64 1,387 Seafood 0.61 55 Steak & barbecue 1.15 104 Unrelated restaurant types (e.g., lunchrooms, bars) 64.79 5,856 All restaurants: 100.00 9,038 Table 3.3–4. Annual emissions from commercial cooking, by equipment type. Annual CO emissions Equipment type (tons/yr) Chain-driven charbroilers 60.75 Underfired charbroilers 196.43 Deep fat fryers 0.00 Flat griddles 16.32 Clamshell griddles 0.00 Total: 273.50 Commercial cooking is assume to occur uniformly throughout the year, therefore, it was assumed that 25% of annual activity occurs during the CO season, and activity occurs 7 days/week. Table 3.3–5. Season-day emissions from commercial cooking, by equipment type. CO season-day emissions (lbs/day) Equipment type Chain-driven charbroilers 333.8 Underfired charbroilers 1,079.3 Deep fat fryers 0.0 Flat griddles 89.7 Clamshell griddles 0.0 Total: 1,502.8 Annual and season-day emissions for the CO nonattainment area were calculated by multiplying the Maricopa County emission totals by the percentage population within the nonattainment area (98.09%). (See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population data used.) Table 3.3–6 summarizes the annual and season-day emissions from commercial cooking for Maricopa County and the CO NAA. Table 3.3–6. Annual and season-day emissions from commercial cooking. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Equipment type (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Chain-driven charbroilers 60.75 333.8 59.59 327.4 Underfired charbroilers 196.43 1,079.3 192.68 1,058.7 Deep fat fryers 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Flat griddles 16.32 89.7 16.01 88.0 Clamshell griddles 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Totals: 273.50 1,502.8 268.28 1,474.1 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 40 Maricopa County, AZ 3.3.3 State-permitted portable sources The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) retains the authority to permit certain categories of sources within Maricopa County, including portable sources. MCESD requested information from ADEQ for all ADEQ-permitted sources that reported any activity in Maricopa County during 2002. Annual total emissions for each pollutant were provided, along with information on the facility type, and information on the location of the site during the year. Permits were classified into four major types: asphalt batch, concrete batch, crushing/screening, and other (including soil remediation, generators, etc.). From this information, emissions that occurred within Maricopa County were estimated as in the following example. Data provided: Source information: Permit type: Operating schedule: Total annual emissions: Fisher Sand & Gravel - Arizona Crusher #1, ID 13464 Portable crushing/screening plant Operated in Maricopa County 1/3/02 to 4/20/02, Gila County from 4/30/02 to 6/15/02 and 6/20/02 to 11/02/02, and in Greenlee County from 11/08/02 to 12/31/02 1.7592 tons CO/year Using this information, calculations were made to determine: Total operating days in 2002: 345 = 29 (Jan.) + 28 (Feb.) + … + 31 (Dec.) Total operating days in Maricopa County: 108 = 29 (Jan.) + 28 (Feb.) + 31 (Mar.) + 20 (April) Any operating days in Maricopa County during CO season? (December–February): yes All emissions were assumed to be equally distributed among all reported days of operation. First, the total emissions attributable to activity in Maricopa County was calculated as follows: Annual CO emissions in Maricopa County = Total annual emissions × operating days in Maricopa County (tons/yr) total operating days in 2002 = 1.7592 × 108 345 = 0.55 tons CO/yr If the facility had any operations in Maricopa County during the December–February CO season, season-day emissions (lbs/day) were calculated as follows: Season-day = total emissions attributable to activity in Maricopa County × 2,000 lbs emissions number of operating days in Maricopa County ton (lbs/day) = 0.55 tons × 2,000 lbs 108 days ton = 10.2 lbs CO/day Table 3.3–7 summarizes the annual and season-day emissions for all ADEQ-permitted portable sources that operated within Maricopa County at some point during 2002. Since no precise location data was available, all emissions are conservatively assumed to have originated within the CO nonattainment area, therefore emissions in Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area are equal. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 41 Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.3–7. Emissions from ADEQ-permitted portable sources, by permit type. Annual emissions Season-day (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Permit type Asphalt batch 25.34 173.8 Concrete batch 7.25 15.8 Crushing/screening 105.56 696.5 Other 0.28 1.5 Totals: 138.43 887.6 3.3.4 Industrial processes not elsewhere classified (NEC) Annual area-source emissions from other industrial processes not elsewhere classified (NEC) were derived from annual emissions reports from permitted facilities. Other industrial processes include a wide array of industrial activities that are often specific to the permitted facility that reported the process. For this reason, it is assumed there are no significant emissions from other industrial processes, other than those reported by permitted facilities on their annual emissions reports. CO season-day emissions are calculated based on operating schedule information provided by the facilities in their annual emissions report. All facilities that reported area-source emissions from other industrial processes are located inside the CO nonattainment area, therefore emissions for Maricopa County and the CO NAA are equal. Table 3.3–8. Annual and season-day emissions from other industrial processes. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 0.98 7.5 CO NAA 0.98 7.5 3.3.5 Summary of all area-source industrial processes Table 3.3–9 provides a summary of annual and season-day emissions from all industrial processes. Table 3.3–9. Summary of annual and season-day area source industrial processes. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Chemical manufacturing 0.07 0.5 0.07 0.5 Commercial cooking 273.50 1,502.8 268.28 1,474.1 State-permitted portable sources 138.43 887.6 138.43 887.6 Industrial processes NEC 0.98 7.5 0.96 7.5 Totals: 412.98 2,398.4 407.74 2,369.6 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 42 Maricopa County, AZ 3.4 Waste treatment and disposal 3.4.1 On-site incineration This section includes emissions from on-site industrial incinerators, primarily burn-off ovens used to reclaim electric wire or other materials. Emissions from human and animal crematories are addressed in Section 3.5.2. There were no incinerators at residential (e.g., apartment complexes) or commercial/institutional facilities (e.g., hospitals, service establishments) in operation during 2002. Emissions from on-site incineration were determined from annual emission inventory reports. Of the four incinerators under permit in 2002, two were surveyed and reported annual emissions. As all four facilities are roughly similar in terms of capacity, these survey results were doubled to estimate total annual and season-day emissions from all four incinerators in Maricopa County. All four facilities are located within the CO nonattainment area, thus total emissions for the county and NAA are equal. Table 3.4–1. Annual and season-day emissions from on-site incineration. Annual emissions Season-day Geographic area (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa County 0.59 4.5 CO NAA 0.59 4.5 3.4.2 Open burning Emissions from controlled open burning are regulated by MCESD Rule 314, which requires a burn permit for open burning in Maricopa County. Burn permits are issued primarily for purposes of agricultural ditch bank and fencerow burning, tumbleweed burning, land clearance, air curtain destructor burning of trees, and fire fighting training. Maricopa County’s burn permit data base was used to identify all burn permits issued during 2002. A total of 140 permits were issued during the year; however, not all permit applications contained the information needed to calculate emissions. Where data were missing, activity data for each permit category was grown from those permits that contained information, as follows: Total activity = ∑ activity reported × number of permits with activity data total number of permits issued Example: Total ditch 85 ditchbank/fencerow burn permits issued = 973,885 linear ft × = 2,854,491 linear ft bank/fencerows 29 permits with quantitative data Reported and estimated activity data for each open burning category are summarized in Table 3.4–2. Permits issued for fire fighting training are addressed in Section 3.5.1.2, Structure fires. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 43 Maricopa County, AZ Table 3.4–2. 2002 Maricopa County burn permit activity data. Number of permits with Unit of Total reported activity data measure activity Category Ditchbank/fencerow Linear ft 973,885 29 Land clearance Acres 1,345 17 Land clearance Piles 69 8 Air curtain Trees 200 1 Tumbleweeds Piles 9 3 Total permits issued 85 34 34 2 8 Activity grown to total number of permits issued 2,854,491 2,690 293 400 24 The above activity data were converted to tons material burned using fuel loading factors from AP-42, Table 2.5-5 (US EPA, 1992). The emission and loading factors used are shown in Table 3.4–3. Table 3.4–3. Emission and fuel loading factors for open burning. CO emission factor Category (lb/ton burned) Weeds, unspecified 85 Russian Thistle (tumbleweeds) 309 Orchard Crops: Citrus 81 Fuel loading factors 3.2 tons/acre 0.1 tons/acre 1.0 tons/acre The following assumptions were made based on previous MCESD emission inventory work: • Ditch banks and fence rows in Maricopa County average 7 feet in width and are burned twice per year (MCESD, 1999). • A pile of tumbleweeds 15 feet in diameter and 5 feet high weighs 200 lbs (MCESD, 1993). This is equivalent to the AP-42 fuel loading factor for tumbleweeds – 0.1 tons/acre. • The estimated weight of a mature, partially dried citrus tree, including trunk, limbs and bulk of root is 500 lbs per tree (MCESD, 1993). To calculate the annual amount of material burned on ditch banks and fence rows in Maricopa County, MCESD estimated the area burned and then applied AP-42 fuel loading factor. The tons of material burned in ditch banks and fence rows in Maricopa County were estimated as follows: Material burned for ditch bank and fence row burning = 2,854,491 ft length × 7 ft width × 3.2 tons/acre × 2 times/year 43,560 ft2 / acre = 2,936 tons material burned/yr Activity data for the other categories were similarly converted to material burned using AP-42 fuel loading factors. Annual emissions were then calculated by multiplying the amount of material burned by emission factors listed in AP-42 (Table 3.4–3). To account for unpermitted illegal outdoor burning, the county’s Air Quality Complaint data base was examined, which indicated 65 illegal outdoor open burning complaints (mostly residential) and 6 issued Notices of Violation. All calculated emissions estimates were thus increased by 10 percent, as a conservative estimate. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 44 Maricopa County, AZ Annual CO emissions from = Total material burned ditchbank and fence row burning = 2,936 tons × emission factor × unit conversion factor × 85 lbs/ton × 1 ton / 2,000 lbs = 124.78 tons CO/yr Total annual CO emissions = Calculated emissions from permit data + unpermitted burning adjustment factor including unpermitted burning = 124.78 tons/yr + (10% x 124.78) = 137.25 tons CO/yr Table 3.4–4 summarizes the annual emissions for Maricopa County from each open burning category. Table 3.4–4. Annual emissions from open burning (tons/yr). CO emissions (tons/yr) Category Ton-equivalents Ditchbank/fencerow 2,935.7 137.25 Land clearance 9,545.5 446.25 Air curtain 100.0 4.46 Tumbleweeds 2.4 0.41 Total: 588.36 Annual emissions for the nonattainment area are calculated by multiplying the percentage of agricultural and/or vacant land use located in the CO nonattainment area by the Maricopa County emission totals. (See Section 1.5.2 for a discussion of the land-use data used.) Table 3.4–5 summarizes the annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area. Table 3.4–5. Surrogate land-use classes, ratios and annual emissions from open burning in the CO NAA. Surrogate land-use 2000 NAA:county Category category land-use ratio Emissions (tons/yr) Ditchbank/fencerow Agriculture 44.53 % 61.12 Land clearance Vacant 15.62 % 69.70 Air curtain agriculture and vacant 19.53 % 0.87 Tumbleweeds agriculture and vacant 19.53 % 0.08 Total: 131.77 Ditch bank/fence row burning is not allowed from November to February, therefore daily emissions during the CO season are zero. For the other burning categories, it was assumed that open burning occurs 5 days per week (most burn permits are issued for weekdays but permits may be issued on weekends depending on circumstances) and open burning occurs evenly during the CO season months (November – December). A seasonal adjustment factor was derived as follows: Seasonal adjustment factor Example: Seasonal adjustment factor for tumbleweed burning = # of permits issued Nov. – Dec. for the category total # of permits issued in 2002 for the category = 3 permits issued during Nov. – Dec. for tumbleweed burning 8 total permits issued in 2002 for tumbleweed burning = 37.50 % 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 45 Maricopa County, AZ CO season-day emissions for Maricopa County are derived using the following formula: CO season-day emissions = (annual CO emissions lbs) × (seasonal adjustment factor) from tumbleweed burning (# of burn days/week) × (# of season weeks/year) = 820 lbs × 0.3750 5 days/wk × 13 wks/yr = 4.73 lbs CO/day CO season-day emissions for the nonattainment area are calculated by multiplying the percentage of agricultural and/or vacant land use located in the nonattainment area (listed in Table 3.4– 5) by the total County season-day emissions. Table 3.4–6 summarizes the CO season-day emissions from open burning for both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Table 3.4–6. Season-day emissions (lbs/day) from open burning. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Category (lbs/day) (lbs/day) Ditchbank/fencerow 0.0 0.0 Land clearance 3,634.6 567.7 Air curtain 0.0 0.0 Tumbleweeds 4.7 0.9 Totals: 3,639.3 568.6 3.4.3 Landfills Emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills come from uncontrolled landfill gas emissions as well as combustion from control measures, such as flares. Total emissions were calculated from annual emissions inventory reports from all landfills located within the county. Two MSW landfills (Butterfield Station and Allied Waste Industries Southwest Regional Facility) are considered point sources and are reported in Chapter 2. All other MSW landfills are reported here as area source landfills. Since there are no area-source landfills located outside the CO nonattainment area, total emission values for the county and the CO nonattainment area are equal. Season-day emissions were calculated based on reported activity data (days per week) for each individual process, and then summed. Nearly all processes reported operating on a 7 day week. Emissions within the CO nonattainment area were identified using information on the location of each permitted facility. Annual and daily emissions are shown in Table 3.4–7. Table 3.4–7. Annual and season-day emissions from landfills. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 27.35 150.3 CO NAA 27.35 150.3 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 46 Maricopa County, AZ 3.4.4 Summary of all area-source waste treatment and disposal Table 3.4–8. Summary of annual and season-day emissions from waste treatment and disposal. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) On-site incineration 0.59 4.5 0.59 4.5 Open burning 588.36 3,639.3 131.77 568.6 Landfills 27.35 150.3 27.35 150.3 Totals: 616.30 3,794.2 159.71 723.5 3.5 Miscellaneous area sources 3.5.1 Other combustion 3.5.1.1 Wildfires and brush fires The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, in cooperation with the United States Forest Service, reported that one wildfire burned 1000 acres in the Tonto National Forest in July 2002. The wildfire occurred within Maricopa County but outside of the nonattainment area. ADEQ also reported that negligible prescribed fires occurred in Maricopa County in 2002. In addition, 2002 survey results from Maricopa County fire departments, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Arizona State Land Department were used to calculate emissions from brush fires. In some cases, the survey results included limited information on the average size of fires. Thus, when acreage data was incomplete or unclear, each reported brush fire was assumed to be equal to 0.1 acres. Survey results are included in Appendix 3.1. It was estimated that 7,054 brush fires occurred in Maricopa County in 2002 and burned approximately 1,656.5 acres. Wildfire emission factors and fuel loading factors were obtained from the Western Regional Air Partnership’s (WRAP) 1996 Fire Emission Inventory (WGA/WRAP, 2002), while brush fire emission factor and fuel loading factors were obtained from AP-42 (US EPA, 1992). Both are listed in Table 3.5–1. Estimates of the material burned in are derived by multiplying the number of acres burned by the appropriate fuel loading factor. For wildfires, a “combustive efficiency” factor of 90% is included in the calculation to reflect the fact that not all available material (fuel) is consumed in a wildfire (WGA/WRAP, 2002). Table 3.5–1. Emission and fuel loading factors for wildfires and brush fires. Number Fuel loadof acres ing factor Fires CO emission factor reported burned (tons/acre) (lbs/ton burned) Type of fire Wildfire (Calif. chaparral) 1 1,000 19.5 289 Brush fire (weeds) 7,054 1656.5 3.2 85 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 47 Maricopa County, AZ Annual emissions from wildfires in Maricopa County were calculated as follows: Annual CO emissions from wildfires in Maricopa County =acres burned × fuel loading factor × combustive efficiency × emission factor (lbs/ton) 2,000 lbs/ton =1,000 acres burned × 19.5 tons/acre × 90% × 289 lbs/ton 2,000 lbs/ton = 2,535.98 tons CO/yr Because the 1,000-acre wildfire occurred in the Tonto National Forest, which is located outside of the nonattainment area, emissions from wildfires within the nonattainment area were determined to be zero. However, annual emissions from brush fires for the nonattainment area were calculated by multiplying the Maricopa County annual emissions by the percentage of vacant land located in the CO nonattainment area (15.62%), as shown in Table 3.5–2. (See Section 1.5.2 for a discussion of the land-use data used.) Annual CO emissions from = Annual CO emissions from brush fires within the CO NAA brush fires, County total = 225.28 tons/yr = 35.19 tons CO/yr × Percentage of vacant land within the NAA × 15.62 % Table 3.5–2. Annual emissions from wildfires and brush fires (tons/yr). Type of fire Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Wildfire 2,535.98 0.00 Brush fire 225.28 35.19 Totals: 2,761.25 35.19 Because the 1,000-acre wildfire occurred in July 2002 and the CO season is November through January, it was presumed that no wildfires occurred during the CO season; therefore season-day emissions from wildfires were zero. It was assumed that brush fires occur evenly throughout the year. Thus, CO season-day emissions from brush fires were derived by dividing the annual emissions from brush fires for Maricopa County and the nonattainment area by a 365 days/yr, as follows: Season-day CO emissions emissions from brush fires in Maricopa County = 225.28 tons/yr 365 days/yr × 2,000 lbs/ton = 1,234.41 lbs/day Table 3.5–3. Season-day emissions from wildfires and brush fires (lbs/day). Type of fire Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Wildfire 0.0 0.0 Brush fire 1,234.4 192.8 Totals: 1,234.4 192.8 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 48 Maricopa County, AZ 3.5.1.2 Structure fires 2002 structure fire data were obtained by surveying fire departments in Maricopa County and by querying Maricopa County’s burn permit data base. The fire departments surveyed reported 3,597 structure fires in Maricopa County in 2002. The list of fire departments surveyed and survey results are contained in Appendix 3.1. Eleven open burn permits were issued in 2002 for fire training; these were included in the total number of estimated structure fires for 2002. It was estimated that 3,608 structure fires occurred in Maricopa County in 2002. Estimates of the material burned in a structure fire were determined by multiplying the number of structure fires by a fuel loading factor of 1.15 tons of material per fire, which factors in percent structural loss and content loss (US EPA, 2001c). Tons of material burned were estimated as the follows: Material burned in = 3,608 fires × 1.15 tons/fire structure fires (tons/yr) = 4,149.2 tons material burned/year Table 3.5–4. Estimated material burned, emission and fuel loading factors for structure fires. Structure Fuel loading Material burned CO emission fires reported factor (tons/fire) (tons) factor (lbs/ton) 3,608 1.15 4,149.20 60 Annual emissions were then calculated by multiplying the amount of material burned by the emission factors listed in Table 3.5–4 (US EPA, 2001c), as follows: Annual CO emissions = Quantity of material burned × emission factor × unit conversion factor from structure fires Maricopa County = 4,149.20 tons × 60 lbs/ton × (1 ton/2,000 lbs.) = 124.48 tons CO/yr Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area were derived by multiplying Maricopa County annual emissions by the percentage of total residential population within the CO nonattainment area (98.06%), as shown in the example below. See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population data used. Annual CO emissions within the CO NAA = annual CO emissions for Maricopa County × percentage residential population within the NAA = 124.48 tons/year × 98.06 % = 122.06 tons CO/yr It was assumed that structure fires occur 7 days a week; however, structure fires vary seasonally and may increase during cold weather. Because local season-specific data were not available from the fire department surveys, seasonal occurrences of residential and non-residential structure fires reported by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were used to derive a seasonal adjustment factor for the CO season (US EPA, 2001c). FEMA reported that 29.6% of residential structure fires and 24.5% of non-residential structural fires occurred during 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 49 Maricopa County, AZ November, December, and January 1994. Thus, an average occurrence of 27.05% [(29.6% + 24.5%) ÷ 2] was used as a seasonal adjustment factor to estimate CO season-day emissions. CO season-day emission for Maricopa County were derived using the following formula: CO season-day emissions = annual CO emissions (lbs) × seasonal adjustment factor (%) from structure fires in 7 days/wk × 13 weeks/yr Maricopa County = 248,960 lbs × 27.05% 91 = 740.04 lbs CO/day CO season-day emissions for the nonattainment area are calculated by multiplying the Maricopa County season-day emissions by the percentage of total residential population within the CO nonattainment area (98.06%). Results are shown in Table 3.5–5. Table 3.5–5. Annual and season-day emissions from structure fires. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 124.48 740.0 CO NAA 122.06 725.7 3.5.1.3 Vehicle fires 2002 vehicle fire data were obtained by surveying fire departments in Maricopa County. The fire departments surveyed reported 5,316 vehicle fires (4 boat fires were included in vehicle fires) in Maricopa County in 2002. The list of fire departments surveyed and survey results are presented in Appendix 3.1. Annual emissions from vehicle fires are calculated by first multiplying the number of vehicle fires by a fuel loading factor of per vehicle fire to estimate the annual amount of material burned in vehicle fires. The amount of annual material burned in vehicle fires is then multiplied by emission factors for open burning of automobile components from AP-42 as listed in Table 3.5– 6 (from US EPA, 1992). Annual CO emissions from vehicle fires = annual number × fuel loading factor × emission factor × unit conversion factor of vehicle fires = 5,316 × 0.25 tons/vehicle = 83.06 tons CO/yr × 125 lbs/ton × (1 ton / 2,000 lbs) Table 3.5–6. Estimated material burned, emission and fuel loading factors for vehicle fires. Vehicle fires Fuel loading Material CO emission reported factor (tons/fire) burned (tons) factor (lbs/ton) 5,316 0.25 1,329 125 Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area were derived by multiplying Maricopa County annual emissions by the percentage of total residential population within the CO nonattainment area (98.06%). See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population data used. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 50 Maricopa County, AZ It was assumed that vehicle fires occur evenly throughout the year. Thus, CO season-day emissions were derived by dividing the Maricopa County and nonattainment area annual emissions by 365 days/year. The results are shown in Table 3.5–7 below. Table 3.5–7. Annual and season-day emissions from vehicle fires. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 83.06 455.1 CO NAA 81.45 446.3 3.5.1.4 Engine testing Annual emissions from engine testing facilities were derived from annual emission reports from permitted sources that were not considered point sources in this inventory. It was assumed that there were no significant unpermitted sources within Maricopa County. Season-day emissions were calculated based on operating schedule information provided in the facilities’ annual emission reports. Since all facilities considered in this section are located within the CO nonattainment area, total emission values for the county and the CO NAA are equal. Results are shown in Table 3.5–8. Table 3.5–8. Annual and season-day emissions from engine testing. Annual emissions Season-day emissions Geographic area (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Maricopa County 3.67 99.9 CO NAA 3.67 99.9 3.5.2 Health services: crematories Emissions from human and animal crematories were calculated by the “scaling up” method as described in EPA emission inventory guidance (US EPA, 2001a). This method combines detailed emissions data from a subset of sources, and county-level employment data from the US Census Bureau (2003a) to develop a per-employee emission factor that is then used to estimate emissions from all sources in an industry category. The most recent data from the Census’ County Business Patterns (CBP), for 2001 employment, were used. CBP employment data for NAICS code 81222 (cemeteries and crematories) indicated 683 employees in this industry in Maricopa County. This employment estimate is used to “scale up” emissions reported from those facilities surveyed in 2002 as follows: Total area-source = Emissions from surveyed area sources × Total area-source employment CO emissions Employment at surveyed area sources from crematories = 0.17 tons/yr × 683 employees 110 = 1.06 tons CO/yr 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 51 Maricopa County, AZ Season-day emissions are calculated based on the operating schedule data reported by surveyed facilities. From annual emission surveys, the modal values were identified for two items: days/week and seasonal activity as a percentage of annual activity. This data was used to calculate typical season-day emissions as follows: Season-day CO emissions from crematories =Annual emissions (tons/yr) × seasonal % Days/week × Weeks/season = 1.06 × 25% 5 × 13 × 2,000 lbs ton × 2,000 = 8.2 lbs CO/day As all facilities addressed in this source category are located within the CO nonattainment area, emission totals for both areas are equal. Annual and daily emissions are shown in Table 3.5–9. Table 3.5–9. Annual and season-day emissions from crematories. Annual emissions Season-day Geographic area (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa County 1.06 8.2 CO NAA 1.06 8.2 3.5.3 Accidental releases As part of its air quality permit compliance program, MCESD keeps an “upset log” for each calendar year, that records excess emissions and accidental releases at permitted facilities. Annual emissions inventory reports also provide for recording of accidental releases. Data from these two sources documented the release of 3.47 tons of CO for the year 2002. Season-day emissions of CO are assumed to be zero, as no recorded releases occurred during the CO season. Emissions in the CO nonattainment area are calculated based on locations of facilities that reported releases. In 2002, all recorded releases occurred outside the CO NAA. Table 3.5–10. Annual and season-day emissions from accidental releases. Annual emissions Season-day Geographic area (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa County 3.47 0.0 CO NAA 0.00 0.0 3.5.4 Summary of all miscellaneous area sources Table 3.5–11. Summary of annual and season-day emissions from all miscellaneous area sources. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual emissions Season-day Annual emissions Season-day Source category (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) (tons/yr) emissions (lbs/day) Wildfires and brushfires 2,761.25 1,234.4 35.19 192.8 Structure fires 124.48 740.0 122.06 725.7 Vehicle fires 83.06 455.1 81.45 446.3 Engine testing 3.67 99.9 3.67 99.9 Crematories 1.06 8.2 1.06 8.2 Accidental releases 3.47 0.0 0.00 0.0 Totals: 2,976.99 2,537.6 243.43 1,472.79 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 52 Maricopa County, AZ 3.6 Summary of area source emissions Table 3.6–1 summarizes the total annual and CO season-day emissions from all area sources addressed in this chapter for both Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Table 3.6–1. Summary of annual and season-day area source emissions, by source category. Maricopa County CO nonattainment area Annual Season-day Annual Season-day emissions emissions emissions emissions Source category (tons/yr) (lbs/day) (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Fuel combustion: Industrial natural gas 68.95 505.5 67.64 495.9 Industrial fuel oil 166.66 1,068.3 163.48 1,047.9 Commercial/institutional natural gas 655.00 5,594.0 643.80 5,498.4 Commercial/institutional fuel oil 386.20 3,465.9 379.59 3,406.6 Residential natural gas 328.39 2,632.9 322.41 2,585.0 Residential wood 3,212.28 53,313.6 3,153.82 52,343.3 Residential fuel oil 0.23 3.8 0.23 3.7 Total, all fuel combustion: 4,817.71 66,584.1 4,730.96 65,380.8 Industrial processes: Chemical manufacturing Commercial cooking State-permitted portable sources Industrial process NEC Total, all industrial processes: 0.07 273.50 138.43 0.98 412.98 0.5 1,502.8 887.6 7.5 2,398.4 0.07 268.28 138.43 0.96 407.74 0.5 1,474.1 887.6 7.4 2,369.6 Waste treatment/disposal: On-site incineration Open burning Landfills Total, all waste treatment/disposal: 0.59 588.36 27.35 616.30 4.5 3,639.3 150.3 3,794.2 0.59 131.77 27.95 159.71 4.5 568.6 150.3 723.5 2,761.25 124.48 83.06 3.67 1.06 3.47 2,976.99 8,823.98 1,234.4 740.0 455.1 99.9 8.2 0.0 2,537.6 75,314.2 35.19 122.06 81.45 3.67 1.06 0.00 243.43 5,541.86 192.8 725.7 446.3 99.9 8.2 0.0 1,472.8 69,946.8 Miscellaneous area sources: Wildfires and brush fires Structure fires Vehicle fires Engine testing Health Services: crematories Accidental releases Total, all misc. area sources: Total, all area sources: 3.7 Quality assurance / quality control procedures Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) activities for the area source emissions inventory were driven by the goal of creating a comprehensive, accurate, representative and comparable inventory of area source emissions for Maricopa County and the nonattainment area. During each step of creating, building and reviewing the area source emissions inventory, quality checks and assurances were performed to establish confidence in the inventory structure and data. Area source categories were selected for inclusion in the inventory based on the latest Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) guidance available. EPA’s guidance for area source categories included in the draft 2002 National Emission Inventory (NEI) was also evaluated, as 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 53 Maricopa County, AZ area source emissions from this inventory will be submitted to EPA for the 2002 NEI. The list of area source categories developed based on these guidance documents was modified to fit the characteristics of Maricopa County, with some area source categories determined to be insignificant (such as industrial coal combustion and oil and gas production). The 1999 Maricopa County Periodic Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories and other regional emission inventories were also consulted to confirm the completeness of the area source categories chosen for inclusion. Data for area source emission calculations were gathered from a wide universe of resources. Whenever applicable, local surveyed data (such as annual emissions report) was used as this data best reflects activity in the county and the nonattainment area. When local data was not available, state data from Arizona State agencies (such as the Arizona Department of Transportation) and regional bodies (such as the Western Regional Air Partnership {WRAP}) were used. National level data (such as the US Census Bureau) was used when no local, state or regional data was available. In addition, the most recent EIIP guidance for area sources was consulted for direction in determining the most relevant data source for use in emissions calculations. Emissions calculations for area sources were performed by three air quality planners and one unit manager. All area source emission estimates were calculated in spreadsheets to ensure the calculations could be verified and reproduced. Whenever possible or available, the “preferred method” described in the most recent EIIP guidance documents for area sources was used to calculate emissions. Emissions were estimated using emission factors from EIIP guidance, AP42, and local source testing. Local seasonal and activity data were used when available, with EPA and EIIP guidance used when no local seasonal or activity data existed. All calculations were evaluated to ensure that emissions from point sources were not being double-counted and to determine if rule effectiveness applied. Once area source emission estimates had been produced, several quality control checks were performed to substantiate the calculations. Most area source calculations were peer-reviewed by two other planners, with all area sources being reviewed by at least one other planner. Peer review ensured that all emission calculations were reasonable and could be reproduced. Sensitivity analyses and computational method checks were performed on area sources when emissions seemed to be outside the expected ranges. When errors were found, the appropriate changes were made by the author of the calculations to ensure consistency of the emissions calculations. The peer-reviewed emissions estimates were combined into a draft area source chapter. This draft chapter was read through in its entirety by the unit manager and the three air quality planners for final review, with any identified errors corrected by the author of the section. The draft version of the area source chapter was sent to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and the Maricopa Association of Governments for a quality assurance review. These agencies provided comments which were addressed and incorporated into the final area source chapter. Further quality analysis was performed by inputting the emission estimates into EPA’s “QA/QC basic format and content checker”, prior to submitting the data to the 2002 NEI. The QA/QC activities described here have produced high levels of confidence in the area source emissions estimates detailed in this chapter, and represent the best efforts of the inventory preparers. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 54 Maricopa County, AZ 3.8 References ASU, 2003. Heating Degree Days: Phoenix. Office of Climatology, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ. Internet address: http://www.commerce.state.az.us/doclib/ENERGY/ Degreedays.pdf. Harris InfoSource, 2003. Selectory CD-ROM Database of Arizona Businesses. March 2003. MCESD, 1993. 1990 Base Year Ozone Emission Inventory for Maricopa County, Arizona, Nonattainment Area, Draft Submittal, Maricopa County Environmental Quality & Community Services Agency, March 1993. MCESD, 1999. 1999 Periodic Ozone Emissions Inventory for the Maricopa County, Arizona Nonattainment Area, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, November 2001, Revised August 2002. US Census Bureau, 2003a. 2001 County Business Patterns (CenStats Databases). Internet address: http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml. US Census Bureau, 2003b. 2001County Business Patterns (NAICS). Internet address: http://censtats.census.gov/ cgi-bin/cbpnaic/cbpsel.pl US Census Bureau, 2003c. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Internet address: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsTable? _lang=en&_vt_name=DEC _2000_SF3_U_DP4&_geo_id=05000US04013 US DOE, 2002a. US Dept. of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Adjusted Sales for Commercial Use: Distillate Fuel Oil, Residual Fuel Oil, and Kerosene (Table 20). Internet address: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/ oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/current/pdf/table20.pdf. US DOE, 2002b. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Adjusted Sales for Industrial Use: Distillate Fuel Oil, Residual Fuel Oil, and Kerosene (Table 21). Internet address: http://www.eia.doe.gov/ pub/oil_gas/petroleum/ data_publications/ fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/current/pdf/table21.pdf. US DOE, 2003. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. State Energy Data 2000 Consumption Tables, Table 8. Residential Energy Consumption Estimates, 1960– 2000, Arizona. Internet address: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_use/res/ use_res_az.html US EPA, 1992. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42). Fifth Ed. Vol. I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. Section 2.5: Open Burning. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. US EPA, 1998. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42). Fifth Ed. Vol. I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. Section 1.4: Natural Gas Combustion. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf US EPA, 2001a. Introduction To Area Source Emission Inventory Development. Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) Vol. III, Chap. 1. Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Revised Final, Jan. 2001. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/ techreport/volume03/iii01_apr2001.pdf US EPA, 2001b. Residential Wood Combustion. Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) Vol. III, Chap. 2. Revised Final, Jan. 2001. Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. for the Area Source Committee, EIIP. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/ techreport/volume03/iii02_apr2001.pdf. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 55 Maricopa County, AZ US EPA, 2001c. Structure Fires. Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) Vol. III, Chap. 18. Revised Final, Jan. 2001. Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. for the Area Source Committee, EIIP. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/ volume03/iii18_apr2001.pdf. US EPA, 2004. Documentation for the 2002 Preliminary Non point Source National Emission Inventory for Criteria and Hazardous Air Pollutants (Jan. 2004 Version). Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for Emission Factor and Inventory Group. Internet address: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/pub/emisinventory/prelim2002nei/nonpoint/documentation USFS, 1993. Cliff Dills, US Forest Service, Payson Ranger Station, Payson AZ, pers. comm. WGA/WRAP 2002. Draft Final Report – 1996 Fire Emission Inventory, Western Governors Association/Western Regional Air Partnership, prepared by Air Science, Inc. Project 178-1, December 2002, pp. 48–51. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 56 Maricopa County, AZ 4. Nonroad Mobile Sources 4.1 Introduction Nonroad mobile sources are defined as those sources that move or are moved within a 12-month period and are not licensed or certified as highway vehicles. Nonroad mobile sources are vehicles and engines that fall under the following categories: • • • • • • • • • • • • • Agricultural equipment, such as tractors, combines and balers; Airport ground support equipment, such as baggage tugs, and terminal tractors; Commercial equipment, such as generators and pumps; Industrial equipment, such as forklifts and sweepers; Construction and mining equipment, such as graders, back hoes and trenchers; Lawn and garden equipment, such as leaf blowers and lawn mowers; Logging equipment, such as shredders and large chain saws; Pleasure craft, such as power boats and personal watercraft; Railway maintenance equipment, such as rail straighteners; Recreational equipment, such as all-terrain vehicles and off-road motorcycles; Underground mining and oil field equipment, such as mechanical drilling engines (not present in Maricopa County); Aircraft, such as jet and piston engines; and Locomotives, such as switching and line haul trains. Emission calculations for most nonroad mobile sources are derived from a Maricopa County nonroad emission inventory of certain visibility-impairing pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, NOx and SOx) developed by ENVIRON International Corp. for calendar year 2002 (ENVIRON et al., 2003). ENVIRON prepared the inventory for use and review by the Cap and Trade Oversight Committee (CTOC) formed by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). In the inventory prepared for the Cap and Trade Committee, EPA’s NONROAD2002 model from EPA (Core Version 2.1d March, 2002) was used to estimate emissions for all categories except aircraft and locomotives. Nonroad modeling for the ENVIRON inventory was based on recent NONROAD modeling performed for the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) for use in the development of a regional haze rule. Since the modeling done for the CTOC was only annual totals for Maricopa County, additional work was needed to develop estimates for the CO nonattainment area and for an average CO season day. Emission calculations for this report differ from the CTOC work in one major area: emission estimates prepared for the CTOC were derived from season average weekday calculations, which were then multiplied by the number of days in each season to produce season totals, and then summed to produce annual emission totals. This approach assumes that activity levels of nonroad equipment are the same on weekdays and weekends. For this report, ENVIRON re-ran the NONROAD2002 model to produce season totals, which are then summed to produce annual emission totals. The revised method used for this report results in annual emissions levels that are about 15% less than the method used for the CTOC inventory. The method used by ENVIRON for this report takes into account the different 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 57 Maricopa County, AZ activity levels experienced on weekdays versus weekends, which explains the lower annual emissions. The NONROAD model define four seasons as follows: spring – March through May, summer – June through August, fall – September through November, and winter – December through February. Since the gasoline oxygen content in Maricopa County changes on September 30, emissions from the fall quarter were calculated for each month separately, and then summed. Seasonal emissions totals are then summed to produce annual emission totals. The methods used to estimate CO season-day emissions are described in each section of this chapter. Emission estimates from the winter season (December–February) are assumed to represent emissions in the CO season (November–January). Temperature and fuel-related inputs are required for the operation of the NONROAD2002 model. The inputs listed below were used by ENVIRON after ADEQ review: Fuel volatility (Reid Vapor Pressure [RVP]), psi: 9.0 in winter, 8.1 in spring, 7.8 in summer and fall. • Gasoline oxygen content (weight %): 3.36 from October through February, 0.0 otherwise. • Gasoline sulfur content (ppm): 179 in fall and winter, 115 in spring and summer. • Diesel sulfur content (ppm): 310 all seasons. • Temperatures (minimum/average/maximum °F): 39/55/65 winter, 53/72/83 spring, 78/94/104 summer, 57/78/87 fall. EPA recommends adjusting default NONROAD2002 model values (such as equipment population, activity levels of equipment, growth factors, etc.) where local data is available, as the default values in the model are derived from national averages. ENVIRON adjusted the NONROAD2002 model defaults in the following manner: • • • The NONROAD model uses 1996 as a base year, and then projects emissions for any given year based on growth factors inherent in the model. The default growth factors in the model were zeroed out to reflect base year 1996 equipment population numbers. Arizona-specific growth factors developed for WRAP were then applied to the NONROAD2002 model outputs to produce 2002 year population numbers and associated emissions. Equipment population numbers and activity levels for commercial lawn and garden equipment were adjusted based on survey results of the commercial lawn and garden industry performed by ENVIRON as part of the CTOC work. Survey results show that for most categories of lawn and garden equipment, the equipment populations for Maricopa County are significantly lower than EPA default values, while the average annual hours of operation for most equipment types are slightly higher than EPA's values. Using these new local data results is a considerable decrease in emissions from this category, compared with earlier results using EPA default data. Equipment population numbers and activity levels for airport ground support equipment were adjusted based on Maricopa County-specific data provided by the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) for the CTOC inventory. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 58 Maricopa County, AZ Spatial allocation factors were developed, based on EPA guidance documents, to apportion nonroad emissions to the CO nonattainment area. The approaches used are described in each section of this chapter. Temporal allocations (used to calculate CO season-day emissions) for nonroad equipment categories modeled in the NONROAD2002 model come from EPA recommendations on weekday and weekend day activity levels for each nonroad equipment category (US EPA, 1999). Table 4.1–1 below lists the weighted activity level allocation fractions for each equipment class for weekdays and weekend days. For this report, the most conservative (highest) allocation fraction in each nonroad equipment class was used to calculate season-day emissions. Table 4.1–1. Default weekday and weekend day activity allocation fractions. Equipment category Weekday Weekend day Agricultural 0.1666667 0.0833334 Airport ground support 0.1428571 0.1428571 Commercial 0.1666667 0.0833334 Construction and mining 0.1666667 0.0833334 Industrial 0.1666667 0.0833334 Lawn and garden (residential) 0.1111111 0.2222222 Lawn and garden (commercial) 0.1600000 0.1000000 Logging 0.1666667 0.0833334 Pleasure craft 0.0600000 0.3500000 Railway maintenance 0.1800000 0.0500000 Recreational 0.1111111 0.2222222 4.2 Agricultural equipment Annual emissions from agricultural equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as discussed above. Emissions are reported by engine type: gasoline 2stroke, gasoline 4-stroke, diesel, compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquid petroleum gas (LPG). Emissions from CNG and LPG equipment are reported in the gasoline 4-stroke category, as total emissions from these engine types were either trivial or none. County-wide results are shown in Table 4.2–1. Table 4.2–1. Annual emissions from agricultural equipment in Maricopa County. Source ClassifiCO emissions cation Code (SCC) Engine type (tons/year) 2260005000 Gasoline 2-stroke 2.12 2265005000 Gasoline 4-stroke 355.26 2270005000 Diesel 275.58 Total: 632.96 CO nonattainment area annual emissions were calculated based on EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002) which recommends using the ratio of agricultural land inside the nonattainment area (185,029 acres) to agricultural land inside the county (415,473 acres). See Section 1.5.2 for a discussion of land-use data used. CO nonattainment area emissions = County CO emissions from agricultural equipment = 632.96 tons = 281.86 tons CO/yr 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 59 × Agricultural land-use allocation factor × 44.53% Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.2–2. Annual emissions from agricultural equipment in the CO nonattainment area. CO emissions SCC Engine type (tons/year) 2260005000 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.94 2265005000 Gasoline 4-stroke 158.20 2270005000 Diesel 122.72 Total: 281.86 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying winter season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/weekend day activity allocation factor for agricultural equipment listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999), as follows: Maricopa County CO = Winter season season-day emissions CO emissions (lbs/day) (tons/season) = 33.61 = 861.8 lbs/day × 2000 (lb/ton) × daily activity allocation factor for agricultural equipment expressed as (week/day) × 0.166667 × 2000 ÷ 13 (weeks/season) ÷ 13 Table 4.2–3. Total seasonal and season-day emissions from agricultural equipment in Maricopa County. Winter CO season-day CO emissions emissions SCC Engine type (tons/season) (lbs/day) 2260005000 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.11 2.7 2265005000 Gasoline 4-stroke 16.96 434.9 2270005000 Diesel 16.54 424.3 Total: 33.61 861.9 CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying county season-day emissions by the agricultural land-use allocation factor: CO nonattainment area = Maricopa County CO × Agricultural land-use allocation factor season-day emissions season-day emissions = 861.9 lbs/day × 44.53% = 383.8 lbs/day Table 4.2–4. Season-day emissions from agricultural equipment in CO nonattainment area. CO emissions SCC Engine type (lbs/day) 2260005000 Gasoline 2-stroke 1.2 2265005000 Gasoline 4-stroke 193.7 2270005000 Diesel 188.9 Total: 383.8 4.3 Airport ground support equipment Annual emissions from airport ground support equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of the number of FAA landing and takeoff operations (LTO) in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002). See Section 4.12 for a discussion of aircraft LTO data. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 60 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.3–1. Annual emissions from airport ground support equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260008000 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.00 0.00 2265008000 Gasoline 4-stroke 3,447.92 3,361.72 2270008000 Diesel 23.17 22.59 Totals: 3,471.09 3,384.31 County season-day emissions were calculated by first multiplying Maricopa County annual CO emissions by 25% to estimate CO season totals, as airport ground support equipment activity is assumed uniform throughout the year (US EPA, 1999). CO season totals were then multiplied by the most conservative weekday/weekend day activity allocation factor for airport ground support equipment (0.1428571) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on LTOs as described above. Table 4.3–2. CO season-day emissions from airport ground support equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260008000 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.0 0.0 2265008000 Gasoline 4-stroke 18,944.6 18,471.0 2270008000 Diesel 127.3 124.1 Totals: 19,071.9 18,595.1 4.4 Commercial equipment Annual emissions from commercial equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of industrial employment in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals, as data on the number of wholesale establishments recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002) was not available. See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the industrial employment data used. Table 4.4–1. Annual emissions from commercial equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260006000 Gasoline 2-stroke 557.16 546.52 2265006000 Gasoline 4-stroke 44,729.37 43,875.04 2270006000 Diesel 511.02 501.26 Totals: 45,797.55 44,922.82 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for commercial equipment (0.1666667) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on industrial employment ratios as described above. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 61 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.4–2. CO season-day emissions from commercial equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260006000 Gasoline 2-stroke 3,070.5 3,011.9 2265006000 Gasoline 4-stroke 237,973.6 233,428.3 2270006000 Diesel 3276.2 3213.6 Totals: 244,320.3 239,653.8 4.5 Construction and mining equipment Annual emissions from construction and mining equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of population in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals as a conservative estimate, as the EIIPrecommended allocation factor of total dollar value of construction was unavailable (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population data used. Table 4.5–1. Annual emissions from construction and mining equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260002000 Gasoline 2-stroke 1,170.13 1,147.78 2265002000 Gasoline 4-stroke 9,139.37 8,964.81 2270002000 Diesel 5,275.07 5,174.32 Totals: 15,584.58 15,286.91 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for construction/mining equipment (0.1666667) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on population ratios as described above. Table 4.5–2. CO season-day emissions from construction and mining equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260002000 Gasoline 2-stroke 5,116.2 5,018.5 2265002000 Gasoline 4-stroke 38,335.4 37,603.2 2270002000 Diesel 27,214.9 26,695.1 Totals: 70,666.5 69,316.8 4.6 Industrial equipment Annual emissions from industrial equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of industrial employment in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals as a conservative estimate, as the number of employees in manufacturing recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002) was not available. See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the industrial employment data used. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 62 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.6–1. Annual emissions from industrial equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260003000 Gasoline 2-stroke 7.23 7.09 2265003000 Gasoline 4-stroke 14,638.82 14,359.22 2270003000 Diesel 489.42 480.07 Totals: 15,135.47 14,846.38 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter-season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for industrial equipment (0.1666667) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on industrial employment ratios as described above. Table 4.6–2. CO season-day emissions from industrial equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260003000 Gasoline 2-stroke 39.9 39.1 2265003000 Gasoline 4-stroke 86,374.9 84,725.1 2270003000 Diesel 3,137.4 3,077.5 Totals: 89,552.2 87,841.8 4.7 Lawn and garden equipment Annual emissions from lawn and garden equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. These results reflect new equipment population and usage estimates from survey work done in early 2003 for the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (discussed further in Section 4.1). Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of housing units in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the housing data used. Table 4.7–1. Annual emissions from lawn and garden equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260004000 Gasoline 2-stroke 4,677.47 4,592.34 2265004000 Gasoline 4-stroke 72,476.35 71,157.28 2270004000 Diesel 119.31 117.14 Totals: 77,273.13 75,866.76 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter-season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for lawn and garden equipment (0.1600000 for the commercial segment, 0.2222222 for residential) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area seasonday emissions were calculated based on housing units as described above. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 63 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.7–2. CO season-day emissions from lawn and garden equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260004000 Gasoline 2-stroke 6,369.6 6,253.7 2265004000 Gasoline 4-stroke 104,564.5 102,661.4 2270004000 Diesel 176.2 173.0 Totals: 111,110.3 109,088.1 4.8 Logging equipment Annual emissions from logging equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Logging equipment includes equipment such as large chain saws and shredders used by such entities such as city parks departments and large landscaping companies. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of population in the nonattainment area to Maricopa Countylevel totals as a conservative estimate, as the number of employees in logging recommended by EIIP guidance was not available (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population figures used. Table 4.8–1. Annual emissions from logging equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260007000 Gasoline 2-stroke 34.30 33.64 2265007000 Gasoline 4-stroke 90.02 88.30 2270007000 Diesel 12.23 12.00 Totals: 136.54 133.93 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter-season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for logging equipment (0.1666667) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on population as described above. Table 4.8–2. CO season-day emissions from logging equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260007000 Gasoline 2-stroke 189.0 185.4 2265007000 Gasoline 4-stroke 477.2 468.1 2270007000 Diesel 78.5 77.0 Totals: 744.7 730.5 4.9 Pleasure craft Annual emissions from pleasure craft equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of water surface area in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.2 for a discussion of the land use data used. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 64 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.9–1. Annual emissions from pleasure craft equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260007000 Gasoline 2-stroke 982.10 336.86 2265007000 Gasoline 4-stroke 439.26 150.67 2270007000 Diesel 2.55 0.87 Totals: 1,423.91 488.40 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter-season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for pleasure craft (0.3500000) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on water surface area as described above. Table 4.9–2. CO season-day emissions from pleasure craft equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260007000 Gasoline 2-stroke 2,998.3 1,028.4 2265007000 Gasoline 4-stroke 1,264.5 433.7 2270007000 Diesel 9.5 3.3 Totals: 4,272.3 1,465.4 4.10 Railway maintenance equipment Annual emissions from railway maintenance equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of population in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals, as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.1 for a discussion of the population data used. Table 4.10–1. Annual emissions from railway maintenance equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2285003015 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.00 0.00 2285004015 Gasoline 4-stroke 43.99 43.15 2285002015 Diesel 17.29 16.96 Totals: 61.28 60.11 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for railway maintenance equipment (0.1800000) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on the population ratio as described above. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 65 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.10–2. CO season-day emissions from railway maintenance equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2285003015 Gasoline 2-stroke 0.0 0.0 2285004015 Gasoline 4-stroke 252.0 247.2 2285002015 Diesel 119.7 117.4 Totals: 371.7 364.6 4.11 Recreational equipment Annual emissions from recreational equipment in Maricopa County were calculated using EPA’s NONROAD2002 model, as described in Section 4.1. Annual emissions for the CO nonattainment area for this category were derived by applying the ratio of passive open space, golf courses and vacant land use in the nonattainment area to Maricopa County-level totals as recommended by EIIP guidance (US EPA, 2002). See Section 1.5.2 for a discussion of the land use data used. Table 4.11–1. Annual emissions from recreational equipment. CO emissions (tons/year) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260001000 Gasoline 2-stroke 971.01 97.97 2265001000 Gasoline 4-stroke 8,803.03 888.23 2270001000 Diesel 14.16 1.43 Totals: 9,788.20 987.63 County season-day emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County winter-season CO emissions (generated by the NONROAD2002 model) by the most conservative weekday/ weekend day activity allocation factor for recreational equipment (0.2222222) listed in Table 4.1–1, and dividing the product by the number of weeks (13) in the CO season (US EPA, 1999). CO nonattainment area season-day emissions were calculated based on land use as described above. Table 4.11–2. CO season-day emissions from recreational equipment. CO emissions (lbs/day) SCC Engine type Maricopa County Nonattainment area 2260001000 Gasoline 2-stroke 3,327.9 335.8 2265001000 Gasoline 4-stroke 28,706.4 2,896.4 2270001000 Diesel 58.2 5.9 Totals: 32,092.5 3,238.1 4.12 Aircraft A survey of all 16 airports in Maricopa County was conducted to collect data on the total number of landing and take-off operations (LTO’s) as well as fleet mix to determine the types of aircraft used and idle times to calculate annual emissions. Of these airports, three locations (Buckeye Municipal Airport, Gila Bend Municipal Airport and Wickenburg Municipal Airport) are outside of the nonattainment area. Data provided by many airports were in the form of the US Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) monthly reporting Form 7230-1, which documents the traffic flow in four major activity categories: air carrier, air taxi, general aviation and military. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 66 Maricopa County, AZ Emissions were derived from both computer modeling and National Emissions Inventory (NEI) default emission factors. For airports that provided complete survey data, the FAA’s latest airport Emissions and Dispersion Modeling Software (EDMS 4.1) was used to calculate emissions. Parameters required to apply this model include annual LTO figures, fleet mix of types of aircraft in each activity category, and average idle-in and idle-out times. For those airports that provided only partial data, the EDMS model could not be used to calculate emissions. Instead, NEI default emission factors were used to calculate emissions. Examples of missing data were detailed fleet mix data or unknown idle times. For airports that did not respond to the survey, LTO figures and fleet mix were derived from an online database that provides free detailed aeronautical information on airports at http://www.airnav.com. The “Airport Operational Statistics” section of this database contains data on average daily aircraft operations at the airport by aircraft type (air carrier, air taxi, general aviation and military). These data were multiplied by 365 to derive annual LTO totals and was used to grow LTO’s and fleet mix. Since the EDMS model requires specific aircraft types to run and the Airport Operational Statistics only provide general aircraft type information, the NEI default emission factors shown in Table 4.12–1 were applied to these activity data to calculate emissions Table 4.12–1. NEI default emission factors, by aircraft type. Aircraft type Air taxi General aviation Military Abbreviation AT GA ML SCC 2275060000 2275050000 2275001000 CO emission factor (lbs/LTO) 28.130 12.014 28.130 Table 4.12–2 summarizes the data received from each airport, and the approach used (using the EDMS model or default emission factors from the 1999 NEI) to calculate emissions from each airport. The following provides an example of how aircraft emissions were calculated using EDMS for Skyranch at Carefree, a small, general-aviation only airport with a mix of aircraft 12,500 lbs or less. Since the EDMS model requires an exact LTO value for each airframe considered in the model, and since the survey did not require respondents to supply exact LTO counts for each individual airframe, an averaging method was used. EDMS was run to produce an composite emission factor for an airport based on the most common type of aircraft using that facility. For Skyranch, a composite profile was created by selecting within EDMS 12 aircraft types likely to utilize the airport, based on data provided by the airport survey and follow-up correspondence. These 12 aircraft types are: Cessna 150, Commanche, Robin R 2160, Socata Tampico, Cessna 172 Skyhawk, Piper PA-28, Robin R 3000, Socata Tobago, Cherokee six, Robin DR 400, Rockwell Commander, and Spencer S-12 Air Car. The EDMS model was run with the above 12 aircraft types and for ease of calculation, each aircraft was allocated 2000 LTO/year. It was then necessary to divide the lbs/LTO result by the 12 representative aircraft used to derive an emission factor for an “average” aircraft LTO. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 67 Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.12–2. 2002 airport activity data and emission calculation methods. LTO data Annual Activity source1 LTOs Airport name category Arizona Army National Guard ML 780 reported Buckeye Municipal Airport3 GA 16,796 reported Chandler Municipal Airport AT 914 reported GA 80,689 reported ML 10 reported Falcon Field AT 1,319 AirNav GA 125,350 AirNav ML 5,278 AirNav Gila Bend Municipal Airport3 GA 522 AirNav Glendale Municipal Airport GA 59,352 reported Luke Air Force Base ML 61,225 reported Phoenix Deer Valley Airport AT 2,495 reported GA 192,254 reported ML 37 reported Phoenix Goodyear Airport AC 131 reported AT 270 reported GA 68,317 reported ML 569 reported Phoenix Sky Harbor Int'l. Airport AC 187,125 reported AT 57,570 reported GA 26,204 reported ML 1,987 reported Pleasant Valley Airport GA 19,302 reported Scottsdale Airport AT 5,026 reported GA 92,365 reported ML 291 reported Skyranch at Carefree GA 2,453 reported Stellar Airpark GA 22,000 reported Wickenburg Municipal Airport3 AT 179 AirNav GA 8,495 AirNav ML 268 AirNav Williams Gateway Airport AC 421 reported AT 3,104 reported GA 79,731 reported ML 5,990 reported 1. “reported” = using 2002 survey results supplied by the airport, “AirNav” = using available data on average daily LTOs from www.airnav.com. 2. “EDMS” = emission factors were based on EDMS model calculations, “NEI default” = NEI default emission factors Table 4.12–1 were used. 3. Airport is outside the nonattainment area. Emission calculation method2 NEI default EDMS NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default EDMS NEI default NEI default NEI default EDMS NEI default NEI default NEI default EDMS EDMS EDMS EDMS EDMS NEI default NEI default NEI default EDMS NEI default NEI default NEI default NEI default EDMS EDMS EDMS EDMS For example, the model run with the 12 aircraft types resulted in total CO emissions of 211.69 tons (assuming each of the 12 aircraft types had 2000 LTOs during the period). Composite CO emission factor (lb/LTO) = Σ modeled CO emissions (tons/yr) × 1 yr ÷ 24,000 LTOs × 2000 lb/ton = 17.64 lb CO/LTO This composite emission factor was then multiplied by the actual number of LTOs at the airport to derive an annual CO emissions total: 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 68 Maricopa County, AZ CO emissions (lb/ yr) = 2,453 LTO/yr × 17.64 lb CO/LTO = 43,272.88 lb CO/yr Table 4.12–1 lists the emission factors used. Table 4.12–3 lists the total annual emissions, and CO season-day emissions, for each airport and aircraft type. For all airports, activity is presumed to occur evenly over a 7-day week. To develop seasonal allocation factors, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport’s distribution of LTO’s for air carrier activity was used. Seasonal activity for the CO season (November – January) is thus calculated as (15,245 + 15,865 + 15,091 ÷ 187,125 = 25%). Table 4.12–3. Emission factors, and annual and CO season-day emissions, by airport and aircraft type. Annual CO Season-day CO Activity emissions emissions Facility category1 Lbs/LTO (tons/yr) (lbs/day) Arizona Army Natl. Guard ML 28.130 10.97 60.3 Chandler Municipal Airport AT 28.130 12.86 70.6 GA 12.014 484.70 2,663.2 ML 28.130 0.14 0.8 Falcon Field AT 28.130 18.55 101.9 GA 12.014 752.98 4,137.2 ML 28.130 74.24 407.9 Glendale Municipal Airport GA 12.014 356.53 1,958.9 Luke Air Force Base ML 13.827 423.28 2,325.7 Phoenix Deer Valley Airport AT 28.130 35.09 192.8 GA 12.014 1,154.87 6,345.4 ML 28.130 0.52 2.9 Phoenix Goodyear Airport AC 7.615 0.50 2.7 AT 28.130 3.80 20.9 GA 12.014 410.38 2,254.8 ML 28.130 8.00 44.0 Phoenix Sky Harbor Int'l. Airport AC 43.267 4,048.17 22,242.7 AT 14.996 431.66 2,371.8 GA 6.838 89.59 492.3 ML 0.643 0.64 3.5 Pleasant Valley Airport GA 0.529 5.11 28.1 Scottsdale Airport AT 28.130 70.69 388.4 GA 12.014 554.84 3,048.6 ML 28.130 4.09 22.5 Skyranch at Carefree GA 17.641 21.64 118.9 Stellar Airpark GA 12.014 132.15 726.1 Williams Gateway Airport AC 6.960 1.47 8.1 AT 14.996 23.27 127.9 GA 18.234 726.91 3994.0 ML 10.288 30.81 169.3 CO nonattainment area totals: 9,888.43 54,332.0 Airports outside the nonattainment area: Buckeye Municipal Airport Gila Bend Municipal Airport Wickenburg Municipal Airport GA GA AT GA ML 17.641 12.014 28.130 12.014 28.13 Maricopa County totals: 1. AC = air carrier, GA = general aviation, AT = air taxi, ML = military. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 69 148.15 3.14 2.52 51.03 3.77 10,097.03 814.0 17.2 13.8 280.4 20.7 55,478.2 Maricopa County, AZ 4.13 Locomotives Annual emissions from locomotives were calculated based on diesel fuel usage provided by Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railway (UP). Railway operations from these companies fall into two categories: Class I haul lines and yard/switching operations (no Class II or Class III haul lines operated in Maricopa County in 2002). Annual emissions from Class I haul operations and yard/ switching operations were calculated by multiplying diesel fuel usage by EPA emission factors for CO (US EPA, 1997). Emissions from UP = Diesel fuel used (gals) × EPA emission factor (lbs/gal) ÷ 2000 lbs/ton Class I haul lines for CO = 9,204,320 gallons × 0.059 lbs/gal ÷ 2000 lbs/ton = 271.53 tons of CO/yr Table 4.13–1. Fuel use, emission factors, and annual emissions from locomotives in Maricopa County. Diesel fuel CO emission CO emissions Locomotive type used (gals) factor (lbs/gal) (tons/year) BNSF Class I haul line 824,339 0.059 24.32 UP Class I haul line 9,204,320 0.059 271.53 BNSF yard/switch operations 824,900 0.084 34.65 UP yard/switch operations 329,960 0.084 13.86 Totals: 11,183,519 344.35 CO nonattainment area emissions were calculated by multiplying Maricopa County emissions by the percentage of track miles inside the CO nonattainment area, determined by GIS mapping: CO nonattainment area emissions = County CO emissions from UP Class I haul lines = 271.53 tons = 103.04 tons CO/year × Percentage of track in the nonattainment area × 37.95% Table 4.13–2. Annual CO nonattainment area emissions from locomotives. County CO Track in CO nonattainment emissions nonattainment area emissions Locomotive type (tons/year) area (%) (tons/year) BNSF Class I haul line 24.32 37.95 9.23 UP Class I haul line 271.53 37.95 103.04 BNSF yard/switch operations 34.65 100.00 34.65 UP yard/switch operations 13.86 100.00 13.86 Totals: 344.35 160.78 CO season-day emissions for both the county and the CO nonattainment area were calculated by dividing annual totals by 365 days per year, as locomotive activity is assumed to be uniform throughout the year. CO season-day = Annual County CO emissions (tons) emissions from haul lines = 295.85 tons = 1,621.1 lbs/day 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 70 × 2000 lbs/ton ÷ 365 days × 2000 lbs/ton ÷ 365 days Maricopa County, AZ Table 4.13–3. CO season-day emissions from locomotives. County CO season-day SCC Activity type emissions (lbs/day) 2285002005 Line haul 1,621.1 2285002010 Yard/switch operations 265.7 Totals: 1,886.8 4.14 CO nonattainment area season-day emissions (lbs/day) 615.2 265.7 881.0 Summary of all nonroad mobile source emissions Table 4.30 summarizes the annual and season-day emissions of carbon monoxide from nonroad mobile sources in Maricopa County and the CO nonattainment area. Table 4.14–1. Summary of annual and season-day CO emissions from nonroad mobile sources. Annual emissions (tons/yr) Season-day emissions (lbs/day) Maricopa CO nonattainment Maricopa CO nonattainment Equipment category County area County area Agricultural 632.96 281.86 861.9 383.8 Airport ground support equipment 3,471.09 3,384.31 19,071.9 18,595.1 Commercial 45,797.55 44,922.82 244,320.3 239,653.8 Construction & mining 15,584.58 15,286.91 70,666.5 69,316.8 Industrial 15,135.47 14,846.38 89,552.2 87,841.8 Lawn & garden 77,273.13 75,866.76 111,110.3 109,088.1 Logging 136.54 133.93 744.7 730.5 Pleasure craft 1,423.91 488.40 4,272.3 1,465.4 Railway maintenance 61.28 60.11 371.7 364.6 Recreational 9,788.20 987.63 32,092.5 3,238.1 Aircraft 10,097.03 9,888.43 55,478.2 54,332.0 Locomotives 344.35 160.78 1,886.8 881.0 Totals: 179,746.09 166,308.32 630,429.3 585,891.0 4.15 Quality assurance procedures Established procedures were used to check, and correct when necessary, the off-road mobile sources emissions estimates. All NONROAD model input and output files, and Excel spreadsheets used to calculate the emissions, were checked by personnel who were not involved in the development of the modeling inputs/outputs and spreadsheets. In addition, the emissions estimates were reviewed for reasonableness by external agency staff. 4.16 References ENVIRON et al., 2003. Maricopa County 2002 Comprehensive Emission Inventory for the Cap and Trade Oversight Committee, Final Rep. prepared for Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality, October 9, 2003. ERG, 2001. Documentation for the Draft 1999 Base Year Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessels, and Locomotive National Emissions Inventory for Criteria and Hazardous Air Pollutants. Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, Oct. 29, 2001. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eidocs/ partllsec4.pdf 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 71 Maricopa County, AZ US EPA, 2002. Geographic Allocation of State Level Nonroad Engine Population Data to the County Level. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Rep. EPA420-P-02-009, July. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ models/nonrdmdl/p02009.pdf. US EPA, 1999. Weekday and Weekend Day Temporal Allocation of Activity in the NONROAD Model. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Rep. EPA420-P-99-033, March. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ models/nonrdmdl/p99033.pdf. US EPA, 1997. Emission Factors for Locomotives. Office of Mobile Sources. Techn. Highlights, (Table 9) Rep. EPA420-F-97-051, Dec. 1997. Internet address: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/locomotv/frm/42097051.pdf 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 72 Maricopa County, AZ 5. Onroad Mobile Sources 5.1 Introduction The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) prepared the onroad mobile source emission estimates for the 2002 Periodic Carbon Monoxide Emissions Inventory for the Maricopa County Nonattainment Area and for Maricopa County. Onroad mobile source emission estimates have been calculated for carbon monoxide (CO) for the 2002 Periodic CO Inventory. These onroad mobile source estimates are for the CO nonattainment area within Maricopa County and also for Maricopa County as a whole. Emission estimates were developed for both the carbon monoxide season and also for 2002 as a whole. Emission estimates were calculated for the following eight vehicle classes: light duty gas vehicles (LDGV), light duty gas trucks of gross vehicle weight under 6000 pounds (LDGT1/ LDGT2) or over 6000 pounds (LDGT3/LDGT4), heavy duty gas vehicles (HDGV), light duty diesel vehicles (LDDV), light duty diesel trucks (LDDT), heavy duty diesel vehicles (HDDV), and motorcycles (MC). Emission factors for these vehicle classes were calculated using MOBILE6.2, the latest version in a series of models developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the purpose of estimating motor vehicle emission factors. The resulting emission factors were multiplied by the estimates of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) to generate emission estimates. The main reference sources for preparing the onroad mobile source portion of the inventory were as follows: • Emission Inventory Requirements for Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plans, EPA-450/4-91-011, March 1991, (hereinafter referred to as EPA Guidance), • Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission Inventory Preparation, US EPA, January 2002, • User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2 (Mobile Source Emission Factor Model), EPA420-R-03-010, August 2003, (hereinafter referred to as User's Guide), and • Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation Volume IV: Mobile Sources, EPA-450/481-026d (Revised), 1992. 5.2 VMT estimation procedure MAG prepared the 2002 vehicle miles of travel (VMT) estimates for the carbon monoxide nonattainment area and Maricopa County. The source of data for these estimates is the 2002 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) data (see Appendix 5.1) submitted to the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). The ADOT contact person for the HPMS VMT estimates is Mark Catchpole (602-712-8596). Each year, ADOT coordinates the collection of HPMS data, including the annual average daily traffic (AADT) estimates which are utilized to develop HPMS VMT estimates. ADOT provides the AADT for the state highway system routes including interstates, urban freeways, and principal arterials in Maricopa County. AADTs for other non-local facilities are provided by local 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 73 Maricopa County, AZ jurisdictions. ADOT merges the Maricopa County data with information from other Arizona counties to create the statewide HPMS dataset submitted to FHWA each year. HPMS contains a number of data elements which describe roadway characteristics and performance for every non-local roadway in Arizona. All non-local roadways have been divided into sections which are 0.3 to 10 miles in length, in accordance with HPMS criteria. These sections are called HPMS universe sections. HPMS contains additional data elements which provide more detailed information on a randomly-selected set of sample sections. The VMT estimates which ADOT submits to FHWA each year are generated from HPMS universe data for all interstates, urban freeways, and principal arterials. Sample section data are expanded to estimate VMT on all other non-local systems. VMT on local streets in the urbanized portion of Maricopa County is estimated using traffic counts collected on 50 randomly-selected local streets in June-July of 1994. These counts resulted in an AADT of 587 for local roads in the urbanized area. To calculate VMT, this AADT was applied to local road mileage in 1994 obtained from the Maricopa County street centerline coverage. In 1994, an AADT of 150 was assumed for local roads which are in the “donut” area. The “donut” area is an HPMS term referring specifically to the area inside the PM10 nonattainment area, but outside the Phoenix urbanized area boundary. Since 1994, the AADTs on local streets have been increased annually on the basis of the rate of population growth in the Maricopa County population; the mileage on local streets is updated annually by the local jurisdictions in Maricopa County. VMT for the CO nonattainment area, based on the 2002 HPMS data ADOT submitted to FHWA, is summarized by area type and facility type in Table 5.2–1. Table 5.2–1. 2002 HPMS VMT by area type and facility type for the CO nonattainment area (annual average daily traffic). Area type Facility type: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Interstate / Freeway 1,129,051 9,046,583 6,240,489 4,525,653 2,678,544 23,620,320 Principal Arterial / Minor Arterial 1,087,462 8,834,531 9,795,953 6,923,412 2,670,291 29,311,650 Collector 1,046,993 2,727,290 1,694,159 872,616 955,062 7,296,120 Local 195,247 1,991,136 2,564,545 1,689,510 855,772 7,296,210 Totals: 3,458,753 22,599,539 20,295,146 14,011,191 7,159,670 67,524,300 Notes: 1. Area Type = f(DENSITY of a planning district) where: DENSITY = (Population + 2 × Employment) / Area For Area Type 1, DENSITY = 20,001+ (Central Business District) For Area Type 2, DENSITY = 10,001–20,000 (Outlying Central Business District) For Area Type 3, DENSITY = 5,001–10,000 (Mixed Urban) For Area Type 4, DENSITY = 1,001–5,000 (Suburban) For Area Type 5, DENSITY = 0–1,000 (Rural) 2. Total VMT by facility type is extracted from the appropriate HPMS templates, with the urbanized area VMT reduced by 1 percent and the donut area VMT reduced by 28 percent. 3. VMT is split up into Area Types using data from MAG 2002 EMME/2 travel demand modeling results. 4. In some cases, the total VMT estimates may differ slightly from the sum of the component VMT estimates due to rounding. This difference will not exceed one vehicle mile of travel. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 74 Maricopa County, AZ The 2002 HPMS System Length and Daily Vehicle Travel for individual urbanized areas (in Appendix 5.1) was submitted to FHWA by ADOT in October 2003. This table reported a 2002 average daily VMT (AADT) for the Phoenix urbanized area (#33) of 63.338 million. In comparison, the 2002 urbanized area VMT for the CO nonattainment area used in the periodic emissions inventory is 62.705 million. The one percent difference between these totals is attributable to small sections of the Phoenix urbanized area (i.e. Apache Junction) which are not located in the CO nonattainment area and Maricopa County. The HPMS System Length and Daily Vehicle Travel, donut area data for individual NAAQS nonattainment areas, (in Appendix 5.1), reported a 2002 VMT for the “donut” area (#33) of 6.694 million. The factors (i.e. 99 percent for the urbanized area and 72 percent for the donut area) used to determine the allocation of HPMS VMT to the CO nonattainment area were derived from the report, “Maricopa Association of Governments Highway Performance Monitoring System Update Study”, January 1995. These factors were also used to derive VMT for the CO tracking area in Chapter Three of the “MAG 1999 Serious Area Carbon Monoxide Plan for the Maricopa County Nonattainment Area”, June 1999. The total 2002 daily VMT for the urbanized and “donut” areas in the CO nonattainment area is 67.524 million, as shown in Table 5.2–1. It is important to note that the 2002 HPMS daily VMT for the CO nonattainment area is within one percent of the 2002 VMT estimated by the MAG EMME/2 travel demand models for the same domain (after conversion of EMME/2 estimates from average weekday traffic to annual average daily traffic). The distribution of VMT by facility type for the CO nonattainment area in Table 5.2–1 was derived from the 2002 HPMS data, while the distribution by area type was derived from a MAG EMME/2 travel demand model run for 2002. The output of this traffic assignment was evaluated using GIS to obtain VMT by area type and facility type for the Phoenix urbanized and “donut” areas. The area type distributions from the EMME/2 assignment were applied to the 2002 HPMS VMT estimates by facility type for the urbanized and “donut” areas to create Table 5.2–1. VMT estimates for all of Maricopa County were also developed by ADOT. The VMT division by area type for all of Maricopa County were developed by applying all additional VMT for each facility type to the Area Type 5 (rural) category, since all VMT outside of the CO nonattainment area but inside Maricopa County is expected to be in a rural setting. The total VMT estimated for Maricopa County is 73.579 million miles per day for an annual average day. The VMT estimates for Maricopa County are shown in Table 5.2–2. Table 5.2–2. traffic) 2002 HPMS VMT by area type and facility type for Maricopa County (annual average daily Area Type Facility type: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Interstate / Freeway 1,129,051 9,046,583 6,240,489 4,525,653 5,662,224 26,604,000 Principal Arterial / Minor Arterial 1,087,462 8,834,531 9,795,953 6,923,412 3,738,642 30,380,000 Collector 1,046,993 2,727,290 1,694,159 872,616 2,390,942 8,732,000 Local 195,247 1,991,136 2,564,545 1,689,510 1,422,562 7,863,000 Totals: 3,458,753 22,599,540 20,295,146 14,011,191 13,214,370 73,579,000 Notes: 1. For the definition of “Area Type”, see Table 5.2–1, Note 1. 2. VMT is split up into Area Types using data from MAG 2002 EMME/2 travel demand modeling results. All VMT outside of the HPMS urbanized and donut areas were applied to Area Type 5. 3. In some cases, the total VMT estimates may differ slightly from the sum of the component VMT estimates due to rounding. This difference will not exceed one vehicle mile of travel. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 75 Maricopa County, AZ Although HPMS reports vehicle mix data for urban and rural areas of Arizona, there are insufficient classification stations in the Phoenix urbanized area to justify use of this information in calculating VMT by vehicle class. In addition, the HPMS vehicle class data do not discriminate between gas and diesel vehicles. Therefore, MOBILE6.2 model defaults, representing the fraction of total VMT for each vehicle class, were applied to VMT estimates for each facility type and area type. 5.3 Speed estimation procedure MAG prepared the average daily speeds for the onroad mobile sources portion of the 2002 periodic CO emissions inventory. The average daily speeds were developed from several sources representing the latest planning assumptions for 2002. For the Interstate/Freeway category and for the Principal/Minor Arterial category, the speeds were developed using data in the February 11, 2004 draft report 2002-2003 MAG Regional Travel Time & Travel Speed Study. This report contained data for the functional classifications “HOV”, “Freeway”, “Expressway”, “6 Leg Arterial”, and “Major Arterial”. Speeds for the first three categories were combined through a weighted average to develop the average speed for the Interstate/Freeway category used in the Periodic Inventory. Similarly, the two arterial categories contained in the speed study were combined through a weighted averaging to obtain a Principal Arterial/Minor Arterial category speed. In both of these categories, speeds were unique by area type. The third facility type included in the periodic inventory is collectors. To develop speed estimates for this facility type, speeds were extracted from the latest 2002 travel demand model run created using the EMME/2 software. In the EMME/2 runs performed by MAG, some traffic links that are classified as “locals” would actually be classified as “collectors” by HPMS. The EMME/2 runs also contain artificial links that are categorized as locals. Since the HPMS collector category includes some EMME/2 collector links and some EMME/2 locals, the EMME/2 speeds for locals and collectors were averaged and the result was used for the HPMS category of collectors. Like the speeds for the Interstate/Freeway and Principal/Minor Arterials categories, the speeds for Collectors were calculated separately for each of the five area types. The fourth of the HPMS facility types is local roadways. The MOBILE6.2 model assumes a set speed of 12.9 miles per hour for local roadways. This speed was incorporated into the current analysis for all local roadways, regardless of area type. Table 5.3–1. Average daily speeds (mph) for the 2002 periodic emissions inventory. Area Type * Facility type: 1 2 3 4 Interstate / Freeway 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 Principal Arterial / Minor Arterial 30.3 34.4 36.1 39.0 Collector 18.2 19.1 24.4 24.7 Local 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 * For the definition of “Area Type”, see Table 5.2–1, Note 1. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 76 5 64.2 42.6 28.2 12.9 Maricopa County, AZ 5.4 Monthly VMT factors In the development of annual emissions totals for this inventory, emission factor estimates were estimated independently for each month, with month-specific meteorological and fuel data. Since average daily VMT varies by month, and the number of days in each month varies, these monthly average emission factors were weighted to more appropriately represent an annual average emission factor. Similarly, the conversion of annual average day traffic to the three months of the peak CO season utilized the monthly VMT factors listed below. Average daily VMT estimate factors were developed from the 1998 MAG Regional Congestion Study and the monthly factors are as follows: Table 5.4–1. Month January February March April May June Average daily VMT adjustment factors by month. Avg daily VMT Avg daily VMT estimate factor Month estimate factor 0.98 July 0.94 1.03 August 0.96 1.03 September 0.99 1.03 October 1.02 0.99 November 1.02 0.98 December 1.04 These factors indicate, as an example, that an average day in February has three percent more traffic than an average month while an average day in June has two percent less traffic than average. Separately, the different number of days in a month will effect the weighting of monthly emission factors to an annual average. For instance, if each month had the same number of days, each monthly emission factor would be equally weighted by 1/12 (0.0833). Since each month does not have the same number of days, the monthly emission factors are weighted accordingly, with January being weighted 31/365 (0.0849), February being weighted 28/365 (0.0767), etc. Combining the two sets of adjustments, the February emission factors would be weighted by 1.03 × 0.0767 in the development of the annual emission factors. These weightings are applied by the FORTRAN program “NEIProgram”, which was created by MAG. NEIProgram reads in the individual MOBILE6.2 output files for all twelve months and for the I/M versus non-I/M scenarios. NEIProgram weighs those 24 sets of MOBILE6.2 output files to a single set of annual average emission factors. The complete source code for NEIProgram may be found in Appendix 5.6. The same monthly factors were used to convert the annual average daily traffic estimates from the HPMS system to reflect an average day during the peak CO season. The peak CO season reflects the three consecutive months when peak CO concentrations occur. For consistency with the 1999 carbon monoxide inventory, the three consecutive months selected were November 2002 through January 2003, in accordance with EPA guidance. Averaging the monthly factors for November through January results in a factor of 1.01. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 77 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.4–2. Average daily VMT during 2002 carbon monoxide season for the CO nonattainment area (November 2002–January 2003). Area Type Facility type: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Interstate / Freeway 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 2,705,329 23,856,523 Principal Arterial / Minor Arterial 1,098,337 8,922,876 9,893,913 6,992,646 2,696,994 29,604,765 Collector 1,057,463 2,754,563 1,711,101 881,342 964,613 7,369,081 Local 197,199 2,011,047 2,590,190 1,706,405 864,330 7,369,172 Totals: 3,493,341 22,825,535 20,498,098 14,151,303 7,231,266 68,199,541 Notes: 1. For the definition of “Area Type”, see Table 5.2–1, Note 1. 2. In some cases, the total VMT estimates may differ slightly from the sum of the component VMT estimates due to rounding. This difference will not exceed one vehicle mile of travel. Table 5.4–3. Average daily VMT during 2002 carbon monoxide season for Maricopa County (November 2002–January 2003). Area Type Facility type: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Interstate / Freeway 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 26,870,041 Principal Arterial / Minor Arterial 1,098,337 8,922,876 9,893,913 6,992,646 3,776,028 30,683,800 Collector 1,057,463 2,754,563 1,711,101 881,342 2,414,851 8,819,320 Local 197,199 2,011,047 2,590,190 1,706,405 1,436,788 7,941,629 Totals: 3,493,341 22,825,535 20,498,098 14,151,303 13,346,513 74,314,790 Notes: 1. For the definition of “Area Type”, see Table 5.2–1, Note 1. 2. In some cases, the total VMT estimates may differ slightly from the sum of the component VMT estimates due to rounding. This difference will not exceed one vehicle mile of travel. 5.5 Emission factor estimation procedure 5.5.1 Emission factor model CO vehicle exhaust emission factors were calculated using MOBILE6.2, the latest version in a series of models developed by the US EPA for the purpose of estimating motor vehicle emission factors. The resulting emission factors were combined with vehicle miles of travel (VMT) estimates to produce emission estimates for carbon monoxide. The MOBILE6.2 runs were executed by the Maricopa Association of Governments. The contact person for the MOBILE6.2 emission estimates is Roger Roy (602-254-6300). For the CO season analysis, two MOBILE6.2 runs were executed for a typical day (24-hour period) during the three-month period of November through January. For the annual emissions estimates, two MOBILE6.2 runs were executed for each month of the year using month specific fuel and temperature data, reflecting vehicles registered locally (subject to the I/M program) and those not registered locally (not participating in the I/M program). The emission factors estimated with these runs were combined to reflect the actual proportions of vehicles subject to the specified levels of inspection. The term “I/M vehicles” denotes vehicles which are required to undergo an emission test and/or inspection under the Arizona Vehicle Inspection/Maintenance Program. It is important to note that participation in the I/M program is required for all vehicles registered in the nonattainment area, with the exception of 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 78 Maricopa County, AZ certain model year and vehicle classes. However, it is assumed that of the vehicles which are of an age and type subject to an I/M program, only 91.7 percent of the vehicles operating within the nonattainment area participate in the I/M program. The remaining 8.3 percent do not participate in the program. These percentages reflect the control measures “Tougher Registration Enforcement” and “Expansion of Area A Boundaries”, described in the Revised MAG 1999 Serious Area Carbon Monoxide Plan for the Maricopa County Nonattainment Area, MAG, March 2001. In the absence of any additional data, this percentage split is assumed to apply directly to VMT as well. Refer to Appendix 5.2 for portions of the actual input and output files and a spreadsheet showing the emission factor calculations. 5.5.2 Development of model inputs The inputs to MOBILE6.2 are grouped into three categories: Header inputs, run inputs, and scenario inputs. The input values used in the MOBILE6.2 runs are specified and explained below This next section looks like it maybe should be an appendix section. Humidity was not used as an input to these runs. After reviewing the MOBILE6.2 guidance on the use of local humidity data (see page 7 of http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/mobile6/m6techgd.pdf) , it does not appear that inputting specific humidity values would be appropriate for the development of an annual average emissions inventory of this type. Header Section 1. MOBILE6 INPUT FILE: indicates that the MOBILE6.2 input file is a regular command file rather than a batch file. 2. POLLUTANTS: CO indicates that the only pollutant for which output is desired is carbon monoxide for this analysis. For the annual CO emissions estimate, the monthly MOBILE6.2 runs performed did not include this flag because other emission factor estimates in addition to CO were desired. Run Data Section 1. NO REFUELING: indicates that refueling emissions are excluded from the MOBILE6.2 outputs. This command is included for completeness, but does not affect carbon monoxide outputs. 2. I/M PROGRAM: 1 1977 2050 1 T/O LOADED IDLE indicates the program start and end dates, frequency of testing, and test type. There are five components of the I/M program modeled; a loaded idle test for heavy duty gasoline vehicles (shown in the example in Appendix 5.2), a transient idle test (I/M240 modeled as a surrogate for the I/M147 test) for light duty cars and trucks through model year 1995, a loaded idle test for light duty cars and trucks of model years 1967 to 1980, an on-board diagnostic (OBD) exhaust test for model year 1996 and newer vehicles, and an OBD evaporative test for the same vehicles. The remaining four occurrences of this command are as follows: 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 79 Maricopa County, AZ I/M PROGRAM: 2 1977 2050 2 T/O IM240 - relating to the transient idle I/M240 program modeled as a surrogate for the I/M147 program. I/M PROGRAM: 3 1977 2050 1 T/O LOADED IDLE - relating to the loaded idle program for model year 1967-1980 light duty cars and trucks. I/M PROGRAM: 4 2001 2050 2 T/O OBD I/M - relating to the exhaust portion of the OBD test. I/M PROGRAM: 5 2001 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC - relating to the evaporative and gas cap portion of the OBD test. 3. I/M MODEL YEARS: 1 1967 2050 indicates the first and last model years affected by the given component of the I/M program. The inputs shown above indicate that model years 1967 and newer are tested by component 1 of the I/M program. The remaining four occurrences of this command are as follows: I/M MODEL YEARS: 2 1981 1995 - relating to the transient idle I/M240 program modeled as a surrogate for the I/M147 program. I/M MODEL YEARS: 3 1967 1980 - relating to the loaded idle program for model year 1967-1980 light duty cars and trucks. I/M MODEL YEARS: 4 1996 2050 - relating to the exhaust portion of the OBD test. I/M MODEL YEARS: 5 1996 2050 - relating to the evaporative and gas cap portion of the OBD test. 4. I/M VEHICLES: 1 11111 22222222 2 indicates that for the first component of the I/M program (1), the five vehicle categories LDGV, LDGT1, LDGT2, LDGT3, and LDGT4 are not subject to this portion of the I/M program (indicated by “1”) while HDGV2B, HDGV3, HDGV4, HDGV5, HDGV6, HDGV7, HDGV8A, HDGV8B, and gasoline buses are covered (indicated by “2”). The remaining four occurrences of this command are as follows: I/M VEHICLES: 2 22222 11111111 1 indicates that the opposite vehicle classes are subject to the transient idle I/M240 program modeled as a surrogate for the I/M147 program. This selection of vehicle classes is also applied to the remaining three portions of the I/M program. 5. I/M STRINGENCY: 1 28.0 indicates that the initial test failure rate for pre-1981 LDGVs and pre-1984 LDGTs is 28.0 percent. This stringency rate is also applied to the remaining portions of the I/M program. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 80 Maricopa County, AZ 6. I/M COMPLIANCE: 1 97.0 indicates that the fraction of the total vehicle fleet subject to the I/M program that passes the I/M test or receives a waiver is 97.0 percent. This compliance rate is also applied to the remaining portion of the I/M program. 7. I/M WAIVER RATES: 1 1.3 1.0 indicates that the fraction of vehicles that fail the I/M program is 1.3 for pre-1981 model years and 1.0 percent for 1981 and later model years. These waiver rates are also applied to the remaining portion of the I/M program. 8. I/M GRACE PERIOD: 1 5 indicates that vehicles less than 5 years old are exempted from the I/M program. This exemption is identical for all portions of the I/M program. 9. I/M CUTPOINTS: 2 CUTcmp03.d indicates that for the CO peak season analysis, MOBILE6.2 reads the external data file “CUTcmp03.d” for the I/M cutpoint values for HC, CO, and NOx. There are 25 values for each vehicle class and pollutant, for the most recent 25 model years, starting with the youngest vehicle. This data is only input for the I/M240 program. For the monthly MOBILE6.2 runs performed to develop the annual CO emissions estimates, the file CUTcmp02.d was used for the January through September 2002 analyses and CUTcmp03.d was used for October through December. 10. ANTI-TAMP PROGRAM: 87 75 80 22222 22222222 2 11 097. 22111222 indicates the nature of the anti-tampering program. Specifically, this portion of the anti-tampering program began in 1987 and covers model year vehicles 1975 to 1980. Vehicle classes subject to the inspection (indicated by a “2”) include LDGV, LDGT1, LDGT2, LDGT3, LDGT4, HDGV2B, HDGV3, HDGV4, HDGV5, HDGV6, HDGV7, HDGV8A, HDGV8B, and gasoline powered buses. The test is performed annually. The test has a 97 percent compliance rate. The parameters tested include air pump disablement, catalyst removal, evaporative system disablement, PCV system disablement, and missing gas cap. The parameters not tested are fuel inlet restrictor disablement, tailpipe lead deposit test, and EGR disablement. A second data line indicates that the same test is also performed on model year 1981 to 1995 vehicles, but with the LDGV, LDGT1, LDGT2, LDGT3, and LDGT4 classes omitted because those vehicles are subject to the transient I/M or OBD test. 11. REG DIST: 02reg03.d indicates that for the CO peak season analysis, vehicle registration distributions by age for the 16 composite vehicle types are read by MOBILE6.2 from an external data file, called 02reg03.d. The raw data upon which the registration distributions and diesel fractions are based may be found in Appendix 5.3. The file 02reg02.d was used for the months January through September, 2002. The file 02reg03.d was used for the remaining months of October 2002 through December 2002 because those analyses are closer to a January 2003 scenario than a July 2002 scenario. 12. DIESEL FRACTIONS: indicates the user-supplied diesel sales fractions. This input is followed by 350 fractional values representing the fraction of the 14 vehicle classes internally examined by MOBILE6.2 and 25 most recent model years that are diesel vehicles. As an example, the first value, 0.0050, indicates that for the most recent model year of light duty vehicles, 0.5 percent of the vehicles sold are diesel. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 81 Maricopa County, AZ Scenario Section 1. SCENARIO RECORD: Allows the user to enter a name to identify the scenario being run. 2. CALENDAR YEAR: 2003 was input because the applicable three-month period for the CO season inventory is November and December of 2002 and January 2003. To be consistent with the User's Guide, the calendar year 2003 was chosen to model conditions representative of the applicable period. For the annual emission estimates, the calendar year 2002 was chosen for the months January through September while for the months of October through December, the calendar year 2003 was chosen because a January 2003 scenario more closely matches those months than a January 2002 scenario. 3. EVALUATION MONTH: 1 indicates that the month to be modeled for the peak CO season inventory is January. For the annual emissions estimates, the months January through March and October through December were run with this setting while the remaining months were processed with the evaluation month set to July. January and July are the only settings allowed for the evaluation month. 4. ALTITUDE:1 indicates the geographic area modeled was low altitude. 5. MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 45.0 73. provides the model with the daily minimum and maximum temperatures for the peak CO season day modeled. The temperatures used are consistent with those modeled for the previous carbon monoxide periodic inventories. For the monthly analyses used to estimate annual emissions, temperatures were derived from the appropriate Sky Harbor Airport Local Climatological Data (LCD) reports. The raw meteorological data may be found in Appendix 5.4. 6. AVERAGE SPEED: various speeds analyzed indicates to MOBILE6.2 the average speed to be modeled for each facility type and area type combination. All facility and area type combinations with unique speeds will be modeled in this manner. 7. VMT BY FACILITY: allfwy.def indicates to MOBILE6.2 that the external file allfwy.def is to be referenced for the ratio of VMT by hour by facility type. The file allfwy indicates that all VMT is occurring on the MOBILE6.2 facility type freeways for use in developing the emission factors for the periodic inventory functional classifications Interstates/Freeways/Expressways. Similarly, the external file allart.def is called when estimating the emission factors for the arterials or collectors, and allloc.def is called when estimating the emission factors for the periodic inventory category locals. 8. FUEL RVP: 8.5 Indicates that the average Reid Vapor Pressure of the gasoline sold is 8.5 pounds per square inch for the peak CO season day modeled. This estimate is based upon raw gasoline data provided by the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures. Specifically, this value represents the average RVP of 138 samples collected during November and December of 2002. For the annual emissions estimates, monthly RVP estimates were derived from the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures data table for use in the monthly MOBILE6.2 analyses incorporated into this analysis. Monthly 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 82 Maricopa County, AZ fuel qualities, including RVP, sulfur content, and ethanol content, are summarized in Appendix 5.7. 9. FUEL PROGRAM: 4 Indicates that the model is to be run with user-supplied gasoline sulfur levels. The following four lines include 32 numbers, the first 16 listing the average gasoline sulfur value in parts per million for the years 2000 through 2015 and the second 16 indicate the maximum gasoline sulfur content vehicles of model year 2000 through 2015 will be exposed. For the purposes of this analysis, the gasoline data from the time period of November and December 2002 was examined and the average sampled sulfur values during that time period were entered for all time periods. Similarly, the gasoline data for all of 2002 was examined and the maximum sulfur value during that time period was entered for each model year of 2000 through 2015. Those values were 45.6 for average sulfur content and 338.0 ppm for a maximum sulfur content. For the monthly MOBILE6.2 analyses incorporated into this analysis, the average monthly sulfur content from the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures data table were used for the average sulfur value while the 338.0 ppm estimate was used for each month as the maximum sulfur content. 10. OXYGENATED FUELS: 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.031 1 Indicates that the 0 percent of the gasoline sold during the CO season modeled used MTBE as an oxygenate and 100 percent of the gasoline used ethanol as an oxygenate. The average MTBE content was 0.0 percent by weight and the average ethanol content was 3.1 percent by weight. The number “1” indicates that no RVP waiver has been granted to allow for the “splash” blending of ethanol oxygenates. For the monthly MOBILE6.2 analyses incorporated into this analysis, the average monthly oxygenate content from the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures data table were used, with the exception of January through March 2003, a time period during which no oxygenate data were available. For those months, an average of the oxygenate data from the months November and December were used. 5.5.3 Model outputs MOBILE6.2 was executed with the inputs described above to obtain composite emission factors in grams per mile (g/mi) for exhaust CO. These values were obtained for the eight vehicle classes described in section 5.1 for the various speeds as described in item six of the Scenario Section, described on the preceding page. The emission factors generated for 2002 are presented in the following section. Representative output runs are contained in Appendix 5.2. These values were subsequently used in developing emission estimates. 5.5.4 Summary of emission factors Refer to Appendix 5.2 for the emission factors developed for CO for each facility and area type. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 83 Maricopa County, AZ 5.5.5 Emission estimates MOBILE6.2 was used to generate CO emission factors for vehicle class, facility, and area type. Daily VMT for the CO season (Table 5.4–2 and 5.4–3) or for a monthly average day (Table 5.2– 1 and 5.2–2) was then multiplied by the VMT mix by vehicle class and the appropriate CO emission factor (Appendix 5.2) to estimate CO emissions on a kilogram per day (kg/day) basis. VMT mix refers to the fraction of total onroad vehicle miles of travel from a particular vehicle type. For example, since the EPA MOBILE6.2 model estimates that 42.2 percent of onroad VMT was from light duty gasoline vehicles, the VMT Mix value for LDGVs is 0.422. An example calculation is given below, reflecting light duty gasoline vehicles on interstates, freeways, and expressways in area type 1 (see Table 5-4(a) at this time, 5-4(a) can not be changed to 5.4–4 and on: CO emissions = DMVT (kg/day) × VMT mix × CO emission factor (g/mi) = 1,140,342 × 0.422 = 5,991 kg CO/day × 12.446 ÷ unit conversion factor (g/kg) ÷ 1,000 CO emissions = CO emissions ÷ unit conversion factor (lb/day) (kg/day) (kg/lb) = 5,991 kg ÷ 0.4536 = 13,208 lb CO/day Tables 5.5–1 though 5.5–4 show daily VMT data, associated speed estimates, MOBILE6.2 emission factors, and the calculated CO emissions for each vehicle class, facility type, and area type for the CO season runs and the annual average runs for the CO nonattainment area and Maricopa County, respectively. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 84 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–1. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 59.7 12.446 1,140,342 13,208.0 5,991.2 INTERSTATE, LDGV 2 60.3 12.496 9,137,049 106,262.3 48,200.6 FREEWAY, with VMT 3 63.2 12.526 6,302,894 73,477.5 33,329.4 and mix of 4 64.8 12.526 4,570,910 53,286.5 24,170.7 EXPRESSWAY 42.2% 5 64.2 12.526 2,705,329 31,538.0 14,305.7 1 59.7 16.382 1,140,342 11,804.6 5,354.6 LDGT1 2 60.3 16.442 9,137,049 94,931.3 43,060.8 with VMT 3 63.2 16.483 6,302,894 65,647.8 29,777.9 mix of 4 64.8 16.483 4,570,910 47,608.3 21,595.1 28.7% 5 64.2 16.483 2,705,329 28,177.4 12,781.3 1 59.7 17.857 1,140,342 5,998.2 2,720.8 LDGT2 2 60.3 17.928 9,137,049 48,251.3 21,886.8 with VMT 3 63.2 17.969 6,302,894 33,360.4 15,132.3 mix of 4 64.8 17.969 4,570,910 24,193.2 10,974.0 13.4% 5 64.2 17.969 2,705,329 14,319.0 6,495.1 1 59.7 10.036 1,140,342 898.3 407.5 HDGV 2 60.3 10.289 9,137,049 7,378.8 3,347.0 with VMT 3 63.2 10.450 6,302,894 5,170.0 2,345.1 mix of 4 64.8 10.450 4,570,910 3,749.3 1,700.7 3.6% 5 64.2 10.450 2,705,329 2,219.1 1,006.6 1 59.7 1.258 1,140,342 7.0 3.2 LDDV 2 60.3 1.268 9,137,049 56.2 25.5 with VMT 3 63.2 1.275 6,302,894 39.0 17.7 mix of 4 64.8 1.275 4,570,910 28.3 12.8 0.2% 5 64.2 1.275 2,705,329 16.7 7.6 1 59.7 0.655 1,140,342 37.7 17.1 LDDT 2 60.3 0.661 9,137,049 304.9 138.3 with VMT 3 63.2 0.666 6,302,894 211.9 96.1 mix of 4 64.8 0.666 4,570,910 153.7 69.7 2.3% 5 64.2 0.666 2,705,329 91.0 41.3 1 59.7 2.287 1,140,342 528.4 239.7 HDDV 2 60.3 2.324 9,137,049 4,302.6 1,951.6 with VMT 3 63.2 2.349 6,302,894 2,999.9 1,360.8 mix of 4 64.8 2.349 4,570,910 2,175.6 986.8 9.2% 5 64.2 2.349 2,705,329 1,287.6 584.1 1 59.7 16.110 1,140,342 202.5 91.9 MC 2 60.3 16.790 9,137,049 1,691.2 767.1 with VMT 3 63.2 17.230 6,302,894 1,197.2 543.0 mix of 4 64.8 17.230 4,570,910 868.2 393.8 0.5% 5 64.2 17.230 2,705,329 513.9 233.1 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 85 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–1. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 30.3 9.753 1,098,337 9,969.5 4,522.1 PRINCIPAL LDGV 2 34.4 9.832 8,922,876 81,642.3 37,032.9 ARTERIALS with VMT 3 36.1 9.933 9,893,913 91,463.1 41,487.7 and mix of 4 39.0 10.157 6,992,646 66,101.4 29,983.6 MINOR 42.2% 5 42.6 10.451 2,696,994 26,230.9 11,898.3 ARTERIALS 1 30.3 13.315 1,098,337 9,240.9 4,191.7 LDGT1 2 34.4 13.423 8,922,876 75,683.6 34,330.1 with VMT 3 36.1 13.544 9,893,913 84,675.4 38,408.7 mix of 4 39.0 13.816 6,992,646 61,049.4 27,692.0 28.7% 5 42.6 14.151 2,696,994 24,115.6 10,938.8 1 30.3 14.437 1,098,337 4,670.8 2,118.7 LDGT2 2 34.4 14.545 8,922,876 38,228.1 17,340.3 with VMT 3 36.1 14.685 9,893,913 42,798.7 19,413.5 mix of 4 39.0 14.989 6,992,646 30,873.3 14,004.1 13.4% 5 42.6 15.373 2,696,994 12,212.7 5,539.7 1 30.3 8.457 1,098,337 729.1 330.7 HDGV 2 34.4 7.578 8,922,876 5,307.4 2,407.4 with VMT 3 36.1 7.335 9,893,913 5,696.0 2,583.7 mix of 4 39.0 7.011 6,992,646 3,848.2 1,745.6 3.6% 5 42.6 6.829 2,696,994 1,445.6 655.7 1 30.3 1.311 1,098,337 7.0 3.2 LDDV 2 34.4 1.231 8,922,876 53.3 24.2 with VMT 3 36.1 1.207 9,893,913 57.9 26.3 mix of 4 39.0 1.173 6,992,646 39.8 18.0 0.2% 5 42.6 1.147 2,696,994 15.0 6.8 1 30.3 0.688 1,098,337 38.2 17.3 LDDT 2 34.4 0.638 8,922,876 287.4 130.4 with VMT 3 36.1 0.622 9,893,913 310.7 140.9 mix of 4 39.0 0.601 6,992,646 212.2 96.2 2.3% 5 42.6 0.584 2,696,994 79.5 36.1 1 30.3 2.472 1,098,337 550.1 249.5 HDDV 2 34.4 2.195 8,922,876 3,968.5 1,800.1 with VMT 3 36.1 2.110 9,893,913 4,230.0 1,918.7 mix of 4 39.0 1.993 6,992,646 2,823.8 1,280.9 9.2% 5 42.6 1.901 2,696,994 1,038.8 471.2 1 30.3 10.210 1,098,337 123.6 56.1 MC 2 34.4 9.250 8,922,876 909.9 412.7 with VMT 3 36.1 8.930 9,893,913 974.0 441.8 mix of 4 39.0 8.460 6,992,646 652.2 295.8 0.5% 5 42.6 8.040 2,696,994 239.0 108.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 86 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–1. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 18.2 10.314 1,057,463 10,150.3 4,604.2 COLLECTOR LDGV 2 19.1 10.220 2,754,563 26,198.8 11,883.8 with VMT 3 24.4 9.873 1,711,101 15,722.5 7,131.7 mix of 4 24.7 9.853 881,342 8,081.8 3,665.9 42.2% 5 28.2 9.777 964,613 8,776.6 3,981.1 1 18.2 13.974 1,057,463 9,337.4 4,235.4 LDGT1 2 19.1 13.870 2,754,563 24,141.4 10,950.6 with VMT 3 24.4 13.455 1,711,101 14,547.7 6,598.8 mix of 4 24.7 13.443 881,342 7,486.6 3,395.9 28.7% 5 28.2 13.347 964,613 8,135.6 3,690.3 1 18.2 15.262 1,057,463 4,753.9 2,156.4 LDGT2 2 19.1 15.127 2,754,563 12,273.8 5,567.4 with VMT 3 24.4 14.628 1,711,101 7,372.8 3,344.3 mix of 4 24.7 14.607 881,342 3,792.1 1,720.1 13.4% 5 28.2 14.480 964,613 4,114.4 1,866.3 1 18.2 14.457 1,057,463 1,199.9 544.3 HDGV 2 19.1 13.758 2,754,563 2,974.5 1,349.2 with VMT 3 24.4 10.571 1,711,101 1,419.8 644.0 mix of 4 24.7 10.430 881,342 721.5 327.3 3.6% 5 28.2 9.095 964,613 688.6 312.3 1 18.2 1.803 1,057,463 9.2 4.2 LDDV 2 19.1 1.748 2,754,563 23.4 10.6 with VMT 3 24.4 1.490 1,711,101 12.4 5.6 mix of 4 24.7 1.479 881,342 6.3 2.9 0.2% 5 28.2 1.365 964,613 6.4 2.9 1 18.2 1.000 1,057,463 53.4 24.2 LDDT 2 19.1 0.965 2,754,563 134.2 60.9 with VMT 3 24.4 0.802 1,711,101 69.3 31.4 mix of 4 24.7 0.795 881,342 35.4 16.0 2.3% 5 28.2 0.723 964,613 35.2 16.0 1 18.2 4.183 1,057,463 896.3 406.5 HDDV 2 19.1 3.991 2,754,563 2,227.5 1,010.4 with VMT 3 24.4 3.095 1,711,101 1,073.1 486.7 mix of 4 24.7 3.055 881,342 545.6 247.5 9.2% 5 28.2 2.661 964,613 520.1 235.9 1 18.2 15.100 1,057,463 176.0 79.8 MC 2 19.1 14.550 2,754,563 441.8 200.4 with VMT 3 24.4 12.080 1,711,101 227.9 103.4 mix of 4 24.7 11.980 881,342 116.4 52.8 0.5% 5 28.2 10.800 964,613 114.8 52.1 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 87 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–1. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 12.9 11.118 197,199 2,040.4 925.5 LOCAL LDGV 2 12.9 11.118 2,011,047 20,808.2 9,438.6 with VMT 3 12.9 11.118 2,590,190 26,800.6 12,156.8 mix of 4 12.9 11.118 1,706,405 17,656.1 8,008.8 42.2% 5 12.9 11.118 864,330 8,943.2 4,056.6 1 12.9 14.927 197,199 1,860.0 843.7 LDGT1 2 12.9 14.927 2,011,047 18,968.8 8,604.2 with VMT 3 12.9 14.927 2,590,190 24,431.4 11,082.1 mix of 4 12.9 14.927 1,706,405 16,095.3 7,300.8 28.7% 5 12.9 14.927 864,330 8,152.6 3,698.0 1 12.9 16.431 197,199 954.4 432.9 LDGT2 2 12.9 16.431 2,011,047 9,733.3 4,415.0 with VMT 3 12.9 16.431 2,590,190 12,536.3 5,686.5 mix of 4 12.9 16.431 1,706,405 8,258.9 3,746.2 13.4% 5 12.9 16.431 864,330 4,183.3 1,897.5 1 12.9 20.082 197,199 310.8 141.0 HDGV 2 12.9 20.082 2,011,047 3,169.9 1,437.8 with VMT 3 12.9 20.082 2,590,190 4,082.7 1,851.9 mix of 4 12.9 20.082 1,706,405 2,689.7 1,220.0 3.6% 5 12.9 20.082 864,330 1,362.4 618.0 1 12.9 2.236 197,199 2.1 1.0 LDDV 2 12.9 2.236 2,011,047 21.8 9.9 with VMT 3 12.9 2.236 2,590,190 28.1 12.7 mix of 4 12.9 2.236 1,706,405 18.5 8.4 0.2% 5 12.9 2.236 864,330 9.4 4.3 1 12.9 1.275 197,199 12.7 5.8 LDDT 2 12.9 1.275 2,011,047 129.5 58.7 with VMT 3 12.9 1.275 2,590,190 166.7 75.6 mix of 4 12.9 1.275 1,706,405 109.8 49.8 2.3% 5 12.9 1.275 864,330 55.6 25.2 1 12.9 5.688 197,199 227.3 103.1 HDDV 2 12.9 5.688 2,011,047 2,317.8 1,051.3 with VMT 3 12.9 5.688 2,590,190 2,985.2 1,354.1 mix of 4 12.9 5.688 1,706,405 1,966.7 892.1 9.2% 5 12.9 5.688 864,330 996.2 451.9 1 12.9 20.110 197,199 43.7 19.8 MC 2 12.9 20.110 2,011,047 445.8 202.2 with VMT 3 12.9 20.110 2,590,190 574.2 260.5 mix of 4 12.9 20.110 1,706,405 378.3 171.6 0.5% 5 12.9 20.110 864,330 191.6 86.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 88 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–2. season day). Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO Facility type Vehicle class INTERSTATE, FREEWAY, and EXPRESSWAY LDGV with VMT mix of 42.2% LDGT1 with VMT mix of 28.7% LDGT2 with VMT mix of 13.4% HDGV with VMT mix of 3.6% LDDV with VMT mix of 0.2% LDDT with VMT mix of 2.3% HDDV with VMT mix of 9.2% MC with VMT mix of 0.5% Area type 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Speed (mph) 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 59.7 60.3 63.2 64.8 64.2 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory Emission factor (g/mi) 12.446 12.496 12.526 12.526 12.526 16.382 16.442 16.483 16.483 16.483 17.857 17.928 17.969 17.969 17.969 10.036 10.289 10.450 10.450 10.450 1.258 1.268 1.275 1.275 1.275 0.655 0.661 0.666 0.666 0.666 2.287 2.324 2.349 2.349 2.349 16.110 16.790 17.230 17.230 17.230 89 DVMT (miles) 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 1,140,342 9,137,049 6,302,894 4,570,910 5,718,846 Emissions (lb/day) 13,208.0 106,262.3 73,477.5 53,286.5 66,668.8 11,804.6 94,931.3 65,647.8 47,608.3 59,564.7 5,998.2 48,251.3 33,360.4 24,193.2 30,269.1 898.3 7,378.8 5,170.0 3,749.3 4,690.9 7.0 56.2 39.0 28.3 35.4 37.7 304.9 211.9 153.7 192.3 528.4 4,302.6 2,999.9 2,175.6 2,721.9 202.5 1,691.2 1,197.2 868.2 1,086.3 Emissions (kg/day) 5,991.2 48,200.6 33,329.4 24,170.7 30,241.0 5,354.6 43,060.8 29,777.9 21,595.1 27,018.5 2,720.8 21,886.8 15,132.3 10,974.0 13,730.1 407.5 3,347.0 2,345.1 1,700.7 2,127.8 3.2 25.5 17.7 12.8 16.0 17.1 138.3 96.1 69.7 87.2 239.7 1,951.6 1,360.8 986.8 1,234.7 91.9 767.1 543.0 393.8 492.7 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–2. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 30.3 9.753 1,098,337 9,969.5 4,522.1 PRINCIPAL LDGV 2 34.4 9.832 8,922,876 81,642.3 37,032.9 ARTERIALS with VMT 3 36.1 9.933 9,893,913 91,463.1 41,487.7 and mix of 4 39.0 10.157 6,992,646 66,101.4 29,983.6 MINOR 42.2% 5 42.6 10.451 3,776,028 36,725.5 16,658.7 ARTERIALS 1 30.3 13.315 1,098,337 9,240.9 4,191.7 LDGT1 2 34.4 13.423 8,922,876 75,683.6 34,330.1 with VMT 3 36.1 13.544 9,893,913 84,675.4 38,408.7 mix of 4 39.0 13.816 6,992,646 61,049.4 27,692.0 28.7% 5 42.6 14.151 3,776,028 33,764.0 15,315.3 1 30.3 14.437 1,098,337 4,670.8 2,118.7 LDGT2 2 34.4 14.545 8,922,876 38,228.1 17,340.3 with VMT 3 36.1 14.685 9,893,913 42,798.7 19,413.5 mix of 4 39.0 14.989 6,992,646 30,873.3 14,004.1 13.4% 5 42.6 15.373 3,776,028 17,098.9 7,756.0 1 30.3 8.457 1,098,337 729.1 330.7 HDGV 2 34.4 7.578 8,922,876 5,307.4 2,407.4 with VMT 3 36.1 7.335 9,893,913 5,696.0 2,583.7 mix of 4 39.0 7.011 6,992,646 3,848.2 1,745.6 3.6% 5 42.6 6.829 3,776,028 2,024.0 918.1 1 30.3 1.311 1,098,337 7.0 3.2 LDDV 2 34.4 1.231 8,922,876 53.3 24.2 with VMT 3 36.1 1.207 9,893,913 57.9 26.3 mix of 4 39.0 1.173 6,992,646 39.8 18.0 0.2% 5 42.6 1.147 3,776,028 21.0 9.5 1 30.3 0.688 1,098,337 38.2 17.3 LDDT 2 34.4 0.638 8,922,876 287.4 130.4 with VMT 3 36.1 0.622 9,893,913 310.7 140.9 mix of 4 39.0 0.601 6,992,646 212.2 96.2 2.3% 5 42.6 0.584 3,776,028 111.3 50.5 1 30.3 2.472 1,098,337 550.1 249.5 HDDV 2 34.4 2.195 8,922,876 3,968.5 1,800.1 with VMT 3 36.1 2.110 9,893,913 4,230.0 1,918.7 mix of 4 39.0 1.993 6,992,646 2,823.8 1,280.9 9.2% 5 42.6 1.901 3,776,028 1,454.5 659.7 1 30.3 10.210 1,098,337 123.6 56.1 MC 2 34.4 9.250 8,922,876 909.9 412.7 with VMT 3 36.1 8.930 9,893,913 974.0 441.8 mix of 4 39.0 8.460 6,992,646 652.2 295.8 0.5% 5 42.6 8.040 3,776,028 334.7 151.8 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 90 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–2. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 18.2 10.314 1,057,463 10,150.3 4,604.2 COLLECTOR LDGV 2 19.1 10.220 2,754,563 26,198.8 11,883.8 with VMT 3 24.4 9.873 1,711,101 15,722.5 7,131.7 mix of 4 24.7 9.853 881,342 8,081.8 3,665.9 42.2% 5 28.2 9.777 2,414,851 21,971.7 9,966.4 1 18.2 13.974 1,057,463 9,337.4 4,235.4 LDGT1 2 19.1 13.870 2,754,563 24,141.4 10,950.6 with VMT 3 24.4 13.455 1,711,101 14,547.7 6,598.8 mix of 4 24.7 13.443 881,342 7,486.6 3,395.9 28.7% 5 28.2 13.347 2,414,851 20,367.0 9,238.5 1 18.2 15.262 1,057,463 4,753.9 2,156.4 LDGT2 2 19.1 15.127 2,754,563 12,273.8 5,567.4 with VMT 3 24.4 14.628 1,711,101 7,372.8 3,344.3 mix of 4 24.7 14.607 881,342 3,792.1 1,720.1 13.4% 5 28.2 14.480 2,414,851 10,300.2 4,672.2 1 18.2 14.457 1,057,463 1,199.9 544.3 HDGV 2 19.1 13.758 2,754,563 2,974.5 1,349.2 with VMT 3 24.4 10.571 1,711,101 1,419.8 644.0 mix of 4 24.7 10.430 881,342 721.5 327.3 3.6% 5 28.2 9.095 2,414,851 1,723.8 781.9 1 18.2 1.803 1,057,463 9.2 4.2 LDDV 2 19.1 1.748 2,754,563 23.4 10.6 with VMT 3 24.4 1.490 1,711,101 12.4 5.6 mix of 4 24.7 1.479 881,342 6.3 2.9 0.2% 5 28.2 1.365 2,414,851 16.0 7.3 1 18.2 1.000 1,057,463 53.4 24.2 LDDT 2 19.1 0.965 2,754,563 134.2 60.9 with VMT 3 24.4 0.802 1,711,101 69.3 31.4 mix of 4 24.7 0.795 881,342 35.4 16.0 2.3% 5 28.2 0.723 2,414,851 88.2 40.0 1 18.2 4.183 1,057,463 896.3 406.5 HDDV 2 19.1 3.991 2,754,563 2,227.5 1,010.4 with VMT 3 24.4 3.095 1,711,101 1,073.1 486.7 mix of 4 24.7 3.055 881,342 545.6 247.5 9.2% 5 28.2 2.661 2,414,851 1,302.0 590.6 1 18.2 15.100 1,057,463 176.0 79.8 MC 2 19.1 14.550 2,754,563 441.8 200.4 with VMT 3 24.4 12.080 1,711,101 227.9 103.4 mix of 4 24.7 11.980 881,342 116.4 52.8 0.5% 5 28.2 10.800 2,414,851 287.5 130.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 91 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–2. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (peak CO season day) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 12.9 11.118 197,199 2,040.4 925.5 LOCAL LDGV 2 12.9 11.118 2,011,047 20,808.2 9,438.6 with VMT 3 12.9 11.118 2,590,190 26,800.6 12,156.8 mix of 4 12.9 11.118 1,706,405 17,656.1 8,008.8 42.2% 5 12.9 11.118 864,330 8,943.2 4,056.6 1 12.9 14.927 197,199 1,860.0 843.7 LDGT1 2 12.9 14.927 2,011,047 18,968.8 8,604.2 with VMT 3 12.9 14.927 2,590,190 24,431.4 11,082.1 mix of 4 12.9 14.927 1,706,405 16,095.3 7,300.8 28.7% 5 12.9 14.927 864,330 8,152.6 3,698.0 1 12.9 16.431 197,199 954.4 432.9 LDGT2 2 12.9 16.431 2,011,047 9,733.3 4,415.0 with VMT 3 12.9 16.431 2,590,190 12,536.3 5,686.5 mix of 4 12.9 16.431 1,706,405 8,258.9 3,746.2 13.4% 5 12.9 16.431 864,330 4,183.3 1,897.5 1 12.9 20.082 197,199 310.8 141.0 HDGV 2 12.9 20.082 2,011,047 3,169.9 1,437.8 with VMT 3 12.9 20.082 2,590,190 4,082.7 1,851.9 mix of 4 12.9 20.082 1,706,405 2,689.7 1,220.0 3.6% 5 12.9 20.082 864,330 1,362.4 618.0 1 12.9 2.236 197,199 2.1 1.0 LDDV 2 12.9 2.236 2,011,047 21.8 9.9 with VMT 3 12.9 2.236 2,590,190 28.1 12.7 mix of 4 12.9 2.236 1,706,405 18.5 8.4 0.2% 5 12.9 2.236 864,330 9.4 4.3 1 12.9 1.275 197,199 12.7 5.8 LDDT 2 12.9 1.275 2,011,047 129.5 58.7 with VMT 3 12.9 1.275 2,590,190 166.7 75.6 mix of 4 12.9 1.275 1,706,405 109.8 49.8 2.3% 5 12.9 1.275 864,330 55.6 25.2 1 12.9 5.688 197,199 227.3 103.1 HDDV 2 12.9 5.688 2,011,047 2,317.8 1,051.3 with VMT 3 12.9 5.688 2,590,190 2,985.2 1,354.1 mix of 4 12.9 5.688 1,706,405 1,966.7 892.1 9.2% 5 12.9 5.688 864,330 996.2 451.9 1 12.9 20.110 197,199 43.7 19.8 MC 2 12.9 20.110 2,011,047 445.8 202.2 with VMT 3 12.9 20.110 2,590,190 574.2 260.5 mix of 4 12.9 20.110 1,706,405 378.3 171.6 0.5% 5 12.9 20.110 864,330 191.6 86.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 92 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–3. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 59.7 13.108 1,129,051 14,710.1 6,672.5 INTERSTATE, LDGV 2 60.3 13.177 9,046,583 118,484.5 53,744.6 FREEWAY, with VMT 3 63.2 13.222 6,240,489 82,011.2 37,200.3 and mix of 4 64.8 13.222 4,525,653 59,475.2 26,977.9 EXPRESSWAY 45.1% 5 64.2 13.222 2,678,544 35,200.8 15,967.1 1 59.7 16.711 1,129,051 11,737.2 5,324.0 LDGT1 2 60.3 16.788 9,046,583 94,474.3 42,853.5 with VMT 3 63.2 16.840 6,240,489 65,373.4 29,653.4 mix of 4 64.8 16.840 4,525,653 47,409.3 21,504.9 28.2% 5 64.2 16.840 2,678,544 28,059.6 12,727.8 1 59.7 18.807 1,129,051 5,223.8 2,369.5 LDGT2 2 60.3 18.890 9,046,583 42,041.0 19,069.8 with VMT 3 63.2 18.943 6,240,489 29,081.1 13,191.2 mix of 4 64.8 18.943 4,525,653 21,089.8 9,566.3 11.2% 5 64.2 18.943 2,678,544 12,482.2 5,661.9 1 59.7 12.791 1,129,051 1,133.4 514.1 HDGV 2 60.3 13.109 9,046,583 9,306.8 4,221.6 with VMT 3 63.2 13.317 6,240,489 6,521.7 2,958.2 mix of 4 64.8 13.317 4,525,653 4,729.6 2,145.3 3.6% 5 64.2 13.317 2,678,544 2,799.2 1,269.7 1 59.7 1.243 1,129,051 6.8 3.1 LDDV 2 60.3 1.254 9,046,583 55.0 25.0 with VMT 3 63.2 1.261 6,240,489 38.2 17.3 mix of 4 64.8 1.261 4,525,653 27.7 12.6 0.2% 5 64.2 1.261 2,678,544 16.4 7.4 1 59.7 0.664 1,129,051 35.7 16.2 LDDT 2 60.3 0.671 9,046,583 288.8 131.0 with VMT 3 63.2 0.675 6,240,489 200.6 91.0 mix of 4 64.8 0.675 4,525,653 145.5 66.0 2.2% 5 64.2 0.675 2,678,544 86.1 39.0 1 59.7 2.449 1,129,051 554.1 251.3 HDDV 2 60.3 2.489 9,046,583 4,511.0 2,046.2 with VMT 3 63.2 2.515 6,240,489 3,144.3 1,426.2 mix of 4 64.8 2.515 4,525,653 2,280.2 1,034.3 9.1% 5 64.2 2.515 2,678,544 1,349.6 612.2 1 59.7 21.115 1,129,051 268.0 121.6 MC 2 60.3 22.030 9,046,583 2,240.5 1,016.3 with VMT 3 63.2 22.630 6,240,489 1,587.6 720.2 mix of 4 64.8 22.630 4,525,653 1,151.4 522.3 0.5% 5 64.2 22.630 2,678,544 681.4 309.1 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 93 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–3. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 30.3 9.686 1,087,462 10,469.1 4,748.8 PRINCIPAL LDGV 2 34.4 9.835 8,834,531 86,363.5 39,174.5 ARTERIALS with VMT 3 36.1 9.982 9,795,953 97,190.5 44,085.6 and mix of 4 39.0 10.157 6,923,412 69,893.5 31,703.7 MINOR 45.1% 5 42.6 10.538 2,670,291 27,969.8 12,687.1 ARTERIALS 1 30.3 12.995 1,087,462 8,791.1 3,987.7 LDGT1 2 34.4 13.205 8,834,531 72,572.5 32,918.9 with VMT 3 36.1 13.375 9,795,953 81,506.2 36,971.2 mix of 4 39.0 13.593 6,923,412 58,544.9 26,556.0 28.2% 5 42.6 14.022 2,670,291 23,291.6 10,565.1 1 30.3 14.894 1,087,462 3,984.5 1,807.4 LDGT2 2 34.4 15.091 8,834,531 32,797.5 14,876.9 with VMT 3 36.1 15.270 9,795,953 36,798.8 16,691.9 mix of 4 39.0 15.509 6,923,412 26,415.6 11,982.1 11.2% 5 42.6 15.966 2,670,291 10,488.4 4,757.5 1 30.3 10.773 1,087,462 919.4 417.0 HDGV 2 34.4 9.660 8,834,531 6,697.0 3,037.8 with VMT 3 36.1 9.346 9,795,953 7,184.5 3,258.9 mix of 4 39.0 8.936 6,923,412 4,854.9 2,202.2 3.6% 5 42.6 8.701 2,670,291 1,823.4 827.1 1 30.3 1.296 1,087,462 6.8 3.1 LDDV 2 34.4 1.217 8,834,531 52.1 23.6 with VMT 3 36.1 1.193 9,795,953 56.7 25.7 mix of 4 39.0 1.160 6,923,412 38.9 17.7 0.2% 5 42.6 1.133 2,670,291 14.7 6.7 1 30.3 0.698 1,087,462 36.1 16.4 LDDT 2 34.4 0.647 8,834,531 272.1 123.4 with VMT 3 36.1 0.631 9,795,953 294.2 133.4 mix of 4 39.0 0.609 6,923,412 200.8 91.1 2.2% 5 42.6 0.592 2,670,291 75.3 34.1 1 30.3 2.647 1,087,462 576.7 261.6 HDDV 2 34.4 2.350 8,834,531 4,160.2 1,887.1 with VMT 3 36.1 2.260 9,795,953 4,435.5 2,012.0 mix of 4 39.0 2.134 6,923,412 2,960.6 1,342.9 9.1% 5 42.6 2.036 2,670,291 1,089.2 494.1 1 30.3 13.080 1,087,462 159.9 72.5 MC 2 34.4 11.765 8,834,531 1,168.5 530.1 with VMT 3 36.1 11.328 9,795,953 1,247.6 565.9 mix of 4 39.0 10.694 6,923,412 832.4 377.6 0.5% 5 42.6 10.114 2,670,291 303.6 137.7 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 94 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–3. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 18.2 10.040 1,046,993 10,448.3 4,739.3 COLLECTOR LDGV 2 19.1 9.940 2,727,290 26,946.0 12,222.7 with VMT 3 24.4 9.609 1,694,159 16,180.2 7,339.3 mix of 4 24.7 9.595 872,616 8,321.6 3,774.7 45.1% 5 28.2 9.559 955,062 9,074.1 4,116.0 1 18.2 13.268 1,046,993 8,641.7 3,919.9 LDGT1 2 19.1 13.167 2,727,290 22,338.1 10,132.5 with VMT 3 24.4 12.875 1,694,159 13,568.5 6,154.7 mix of 4 24.7 12.863 872,616 6,982.4 3,167.2 28.2% 5 28.2 12.859 955,062 7,639.7 3,465.4 1 18.2 15.380 1,046,993 3,961.5 1,796.9 LDGT2 2 19.1 15.251 2,727,290 10,232.5 4,641.4 with VMT 3 24.4 14.841 1,694,159 6,185.5 2,805.7 mix of 4 24.7 14.827 872,616 3,182.9 1,443.8 11.2% 5 28.2 14.777 955,062 3,472.0 1,574.9 1 18.2 18.423 1,046,993 1,513.7 686.6 HDGV 2 19.1 17.524 2,727,290 3,750.6 1,701.3 with VMT 3 24.4 13.463 1,694,159 1,789.9 811.9 mix of 4 24.7 13.282 872,616 909.5 412.6 3.6% 5 28.2 11.581 955,062 868.0 393.7 1 18.2 1.786 1,046,993 9.1 4.1 LDDV 2 19.1 1.731 2,727,290 22.9 10.4 with VMT 3 24.4 1.474 1,694,159 12.1 5.5 mix of 4 24.7 1.463 872,616 6.2 2.8 0.2% 5 28.2 1.350 955,062 6.3 2.8 1 18.2 1.015 1,046,993 50.6 23.0 LDDT 2 19.1 0.979 2,727,290 127.2 57.7 with VMT 3 24.4 0.813 1,694,159 65.6 29.8 mix of 4 24.7 0.806 872,616 33.5 15.2 2.2% 5 28.2 0.733 955,062 33.3 15.1 1 18.2 4.479 1,046,993 939.7 426.3 HDDV 2 19.1 4.274 2,727,290 2,335.5 1,059.4 with VMT 3 24.4 3.314 1,694,159 1,125.0 510.3 mix of 4 24.7 3.271 872,616 572.0 259.5 9.1% 5 28.2 2.849 955,062 545.3 247.3 1 18.2 19.735 1,046,993 232.3 105.4 MC 2 19.1 18.983 2,727,290 582.0 264.0 with VMT 3 24.4 15.626 1,694,159 297.6 135.0 mix of 4 24.7 15.480 872,616 151.9 68.9 0.5% 5 28.2 13.874 955,062 149.0 67.6 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 95 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–3. Daily CO emissions in the CO nonattainment area, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 12.9 10.904 195,247 2,116.1 959.8 LOCAL LDGV 2 12.9 10.904 1,991,136 21,579.8 9,788.6 with VMT 3 12.9 10.904 2,564,545 27,794.3 12,607.5 mix of 4 12.9 10.904 1,689,510 18,310.8 8,305.8 45.1% 5 12.9 10.904 855,772 9,274.8 4,207.0 1 12.9 14.157 195,247 1,719.5 780.0 LDGT1 2 12.9 14.157 1,991,136 17,535.4 7,954.1 with VMT 3 12.9 14.157 2,564,545 22,585.3 10,244.7 mix of 4 12.9 14.157 1,689,510 14,879.1 6,749.1 28.2% 5 12.9 14.157 855,772 7,536.6 3,418.6 1 12.9 16.521 195,247 793.5 360.0 LDGT2 2 12.9 16.521 1,991,136 8,092.6 3,670.8 with VMT 3 12.9 16.521 2,564,545 10,423.1 4,727.9 mix of 4 12.9 16.521 1,689,510 6,866.7 3,114.7 11.2% 5 12.9 16.521 855,772 3,478.1 1,577.7 1 12.9 25.590 195,247 392.1 177.9 HDGV 2 12.9 25.590 1,991,136 3,998.6 1,813.8 with VMT 3 12.9 25.590 2,564,545 5,150.1 2,336.1 mix of 4 12.9 25.590 1,689,510 3,392.9 1,539.0 3.6% 5 12.9 25.590 855,772 1,718.6 779.5 1 12.9 2.216 195,247 2.1 1.0 LDDV 2 12.9 2.216 1,991,136 21.4 9.7 with VMT 3 12.9 2.216 2,564,545 27.6 12.5 mix of 4 12.9 2.216 1,689,510 18.2 8.2 0.2% 5 12.9 2.216 855,772 9.2 4.2 1 12.9 1.294 195,247 12.0 5.5 LDDT 2 12.9 1.294 1,991,136 122.7 55.6 with VMT 3 12.9 1.294 2,564,545 158.0 71.7 mix of 4 12.9 1.294 1,689,510 104.1 47.2 2.2% 5 12.9 1.294 855,772 52.7 23.9 1 12.9 6.090 195,247 238.3 108.1 HDDV 2 12.9 6.090 1,991,136 2,429.9 1,102.2 with VMT 3 12.9 6.090 2,564,545 3,129.7 1,419.6 mix of 4 12.9 6.090 1,689,510 2,061.8 935.2 9.1% 5 12.9 6.090 855,772 1,044.4 473.7 1 12.9 26.555 195,247 58.3 26.4 MC 2 12.9 26.555 1,991,136 594.4 269.6 with VMT 3 12.9 26.555 2,564,545 765.6 347.3 mix of 4 12.9 26.555 1,689,510 504.4 228.8 0.5% 5 12.9 26.555 855,772 255.5 115.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 96 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–4. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County, by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 59.7 13.108 1,129,051 14,710.1 6,672.5 INTERSTATE, LDGV 2 60.3 13.177 9,046,583 118,484.5 53,744.6 FREEWAY, with VMT 3 63.2 13.222 6,240,489 82,011.2 37,200.3 and mix of 4 64.8 13.222 4,525,653 59,475.2 26,977.9 EXPRESSWAY 45.1% 5 64.2 13.222 5,662,224 74,411.7 33,753.2 1 59.7 16.711 1,129,051 11,737.2 5,324.0 LDGT1 2 60.3 16.788 9,046,583 94,474.3 42,853.5 with VMT 3 63.2 16.840 6,240,489 65,373.4 29,653.4 mix of 4 64.8 16.840 4,525,653 47,409.3 21,504.9 28.2% 5 64.2 16.840 5,662,224 59,315.7 26,905.6 1 59.7 18.807 1,129,051 5,223.8 2,369.5 LDGT2 2 60.3 18.890 9,046,583 42,041.0 19,069.8 with VMT 3 63.2 18.943 6,240,489 29,081.1 13,191.2 mix of 4 64.8 18.943 4,525,653 21,089.8 9,566.3 11.2% 5 64.2 18.943 5,662,224 26,386.3 11,968.8 1 59.7 12.791 1,129,051 1,133.4 514.1 HDGV 2 60.3 13.109 9,046,583 9,306.8 4,221.6 with VMT 3 63.2 13.317 6,240,489 6,521.7 2,958.2 mix of 4 64.8 13.317 4,525,653 4,729.6 2,145.3 3.6% 5 64.2 13.317 5,662,224 5,917.3 2,684.1 1 59.7 1.243 1,129,051 6.8 3.1 LDDV 2 60.3 1.254 9,046,583 55.0 25.0 with VMT 3 63.2 1.261 6,240,489 38.2 17.3 mix of 4 64.8 1.261 4,525,653 27.7 12.6 0.2% 5 64.2 1.261 5,662,224 34.6 15.7 1 59.7 0.664 1,129,051 35.7 16.2 LDDT 2 60.3 0.671 9,046,583 288.8 131.0 with VMT 3 63.2 0.675 6,240,489 200.6 91.0 mix of 4 64.8 0.675 4,525,653 145.5 66.0 2.2% 5 64.2 0.675 5,662,224 182.0 82.5 1 59.7 2.449 1,129,051 554.1 251.3 HDDV 2 60.3 2.489 9,046,583 4,511.0 2,046.2 with VMT 3 63.2 2.515 6,240,489 3,144.3 1,426.2 mix of 4 64.8 2.515 4,525,653 2,280.2 1,034.3 9.1% 5 64.2 2.515 5,662,224 2,852.9 1,294.1 1 59.7 21.115 1,129,051 268.0 121.6 MC 2 60.3 22.030 9,046,583 2,240.5 1,016.3 with VMT 3 63.2 22.630 6,240,489 1,587.6 720.2 mix of 4 64.8 22.630 4,525,653 1,151.4 522.3 0.5% 5 64.2 22.630 5,662,224 1,440.5 653.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 97 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–4. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 30.3 9.686 1,087,462 10,469.1 4,748.8 PRINCIPAL LDGV 2 34.4 9.835 8,834,531 86,363.5 39,174.5 ARTERIALS with VMT 3 36.1 9.982 9,795,953 97,190.5 44,085.6 and mix of 4 39.0 10.157 6,923,412 69,893.5 31,703.7 MINOR 45.1% 5 42.6 10.538 3,738,642 39,160.1 17,763.0 ARTERIALS 1 30.3 12.995 1,087,462 8,791.1 3,987.7 LDGT1 2 34.4 13.205 8,834,531 72,572.5 32,918.9 with VMT 3 36.1 13.375 9,795,953 81,506.2 36,971.2 mix of 4 39.0 13.593 6,923,412 58,544.9 26,556.0 28.2% 5 42.6 14.022 3,738,642 32,610.3 14,792.0 1 30.3 14.894 1,087,462 3,984.5 1,807.4 LDGT2 2 34.4 15.091 8,834,531 32,797.5 14,876.9 with VMT 3 36.1 15.270 9,795,953 36,798.8 16,691.9 mix of 4 39.0 15.509 6,923,412 26,415.6 11,982.1 11.2% 5 42.6 15.966 3,738,642 14,684.6 6,661.0 1 30.3 10.773 1,087,462 919.4 417.0 HDGV 2 34.4 9.660 8,834,531 6,697.0 3,037.8 with VMT 3 36.1 9.346 9,795,953 7,184.5 3,258.9 mix of 4 39.0 8.936 6,923,412 4,854.9 2,202.2 3.6% 5 42.6 8.701 3,738,642 2,552.9 1,158.0 1 30.3 1.296 1,087,462 6.8 3.1 LDDV 2 34.4 1.217 8,834,531 52.1 23.6 with VMT 3 36.1 1.193 9,795,953 56.7 25.7 mix of 4 39.0 1.160 6,923,412 38.9 17.7 0.2% 5 42.6 1.133 3,738,642 20.5 9.3 1 30.3 0.698 1,087,462 36.1 16.4 LDDT 2 34.4 0.647 8,834,531 272.1 123.4 with VMT 3 36.1 0.631 9,795,953 294.2 133.4 mix of 4 39.0 0.609 6,923,412 200.8 91.1 2.2% 5 42.6 0.592 3,738,642 105.4 47.8 1 30.3 2.647 1,087,462 576.7 261.6 HDDV 2 34.4 2.350 8,834,531 4,160.2 1,887.1 with VMT 3 36.1 2.260 9,795,953 4,435.5 2,012.0 mix of 4 39.0 2.134 6,923,412 2,960.6 1,342.9 9.1% 5 42.6 2.036 3,738,642 1,524.9 691.7 1 30.3 13.080 1,087,462 159.9 72.5 MC 2 34.4 11.765 8,834,531 1,168.5 530.1 with VMT 3 36.1 11.328 9,795,953 1,247.6 565.9 mix of 4 39.0 10.694 6,923,412 832.4 377.6 0.5% 5 42.6 10.114 3,738,642 425.1 192.8 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 98 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–4. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 18.2 10.040 1,046,993 10,448.3 4,739.3 COLLECTOR LDGV 2 19.1 9.940 2,727,290 26,946.0 12,222.7 with VMT 3 24.4 9.609 1,694,159 16,180.2 7,339.3 mix of 4 24.7 9.595 872,616 8,321.6 3,774.7 45.1% 5 28.2 9.559 2,390,942 22,716.5 10,304.2 1 18.2 13.268 1,046,993 8,641.7 3,919.9 LDGT1 2 19.1 13.167 2,727,290 22,338.1 10,132.5 with VMT 3 24.4 12.875 1,694,159 13,568.5 6,154.7 mix of 4 24.7 12.863 872,616 6,982.4 3,167.2 28.2% 5 28.2 12.859 2,390,942 19,125.5 8,675.3 1 18.2 15.380 1,046,993 3,961.5 1,796.9 LDGT2 2 19.1 15.251 2,727,290 10,232.5 4,641.4 with VMT 3 24.4 14.841 1,694,159 6,185.5 2,805.7 mix of 4 24.7 14.827 872,616 3,182.9 1,443.8 11.2% 5 28.2 14.777 2,390,942 8,691.9 3,942.6 1 18.2 18.423 1,046,993 1,513.7 686.6 HDGV 2 19.1 17.524 2,727,290 3,750.6 1,701.3 with VMT 3 24.4 13.463 1,694,159 1,789.9 811.9 mix of 4 24.7 13.282 872,616 909.5 412.6 3.6% 5 28.2 11.581 2,390,942 2,173.0 985.7 1 18.2 1.786 1,046,993 9.1 4.1 LDDV 2 19.1 1.731 2,727,290 22.9 10.4 with VMT 3 24.4 1.474 1,694,159 12.1 5.5 mix of 4 24.7 1.463 872,616 6.2 2.8 0.2% 5 28.2 1.350 2,390,942 15.7 7.1 1 18.2 1.015 1,046,993 50.6 23.0 LDDT 2 19.1 0.979 2,727,290 127.2 57.7 with VMT 3 24.4 0.813 1,694,159 65.6 29.8 mix of 4 24.7 0.806 872,616 33.5 15.2 2.2% 5 28.2 0.733 2,390,942 83.5 37.9 1 18.2 4.479 1,046,993 939.7 426.3 HDDV 2 19.1 4.274 2,727,290 2,335.5 1,059.4 with VMT 3 24.4 3.314 1,694,159 1,125.0 510.3 mix of 4 24.7 3.271 872,616 572.0 259.5 9.1% 5 28.2 2.849 2,390,942 1,365.0 619.2 1 18.2 19.735 1,046,993 232.3 105.4 MC 2 19.1 18.983 2,727,290 582.0 264.0 with VMT 3 24.4 15.626 1,694,159 297.6 135.0 mix of 4 24.7 15.480 872,616 151.9 68.9 0.5% 5 28.2 13.874 2,390,942 372.9 169.2 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 99 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.5–4. Daily CO emissions in Maricopa County by vehicle class, facility type and area type (annual average daily traffic) (continued). Vehicle Area Speed Emission DVMT Emissions Emissions Facility type class type (mph) factor (g/mi) (miles) (lb/day) (kg/day) 1 12.9 10.904 195,247 2,116.1 959.8 LOCAL LDGV 2 12.9 10.904 1,991,136 21,579.8 9,788.6 with VMT 3 12.9 10.904 2,564,545 27,794.3 12,607.5 mix of 4 12.9 10.904 1,689,510 18,310.8 8,305.8 45.1% 5 12.9 10.904 1,422,562 15,417.6 6,993.4 1 12.9 14.157 195,247 1,719.5 780.0 LDGT1 2 12.9 14.157 1,991,136 17,535.4 7,954.1 with VMT 3 12.9 14.157 2,564,545 22,585.3 10,244.7 mix of 4 12.9 14.157 1,689,510 14,879.1 6,749.1 28.2% 5 12.9 14.157 1,422,562 12,528.1 5,682.8 1 12.9 16.521 195,247 793.5 360.0 LDGT2 2 12.9 16.521 1,991,136 8,092.6 3,670.8 with VMT 3 12.9 16.521 2,564,545 10,423.1 4,727.9 mix of 4 12.9 16.521 1,689,510 6,866.7 3,114.7 11.2% 5 12.9 16.521 1,422,562 5,781.7 2,622.6 1 12.9 25.590 195,247 392.1 177.9 HDGV 2 12.9 25.590 1,991,136 3,998.6 1,813.8 with VMT 3 12.9 25.590 2,564,545 5,150.1 2,336.1 mix of 4 12.9 25.590 1,689,510 3,392.9 1,539.0 3.6% 5 12.9 25.590 1,422,562 2,856.8 1,295.8 1 12.9 2.216 195,247 2.1 1.0 LDDV 2 12.9 2.216 1,991,136 21.4 9.7 with VMT 3 12.9 2.216 2,564,545 27.6 12.5 mix of 4 12.9 2.216 1,689,510 18.2 8.2 0.2% 5 12.9 2.216 1,422,562 15.3 6.9 1 12.9 1.294 195,247 12.0 5.5 LDDT 2 12.9 1.294 1,991,136 122.7 55.6 with VMT 3 12.9 1.294 2,564,545 158.0 71.7 mix of 4 12.9 1.294 1,689,510 104.1 47.2 2.2% 5 12.9 1.294 1,422,562 87.6 39.8 1 12.9 6.090 195,247 238.3 108.1 HDDV 2 12.9 6.090 1,991,136 2,429.9 1,102.2 with VMT 3 12.9 6.090 2,564,545 3,129.7 1,419.6 mix of 4 12.9 6.090 1,689,510 2,061.8 935.2 9.1% 5 12.9 6.090 1,422,562 1,736.1 787.5 1 12.9 26.555 195,247 58.3 26.4 MC 2 12.9 26.555 1,991,136 594.4 269.6 with VMT 3 12.9 26.555 2,564,545 765.6 347.3 mix of 4 12.9 26.555 1,689,510 504.4 228.8 0.5% 5 12.9 26.555 1,422,562 424.7 192.6 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 100 Maricopa County, AZ 5.6 Summary of CO emissions from onroad mobile sources Tables 5.6–1 through 5.6–4 summarize the calculated CO emissions by vehicle class, area, and facility type. Total daily CO emissions from onroad mobile sources for the CO nonattainment area in the 2002 carbon monoxide season are estimated to be 799,751 kilograms per day or 1,763,151 pounds per day. Total CO emissions from daily onroad mobile sources for all of Maricopa County for the 2002 carbon monoxide season are estimated to be 873,558 kilograms per day or 1,925,867 pounds per day. Similarly, total CO emissions were estimated for all of 2002. For the carbon monoxide nonattainment area, onroad estimates are 322,867 English tons per year. For all of Maricopa County, onroad emissions are estimated to be 352,821 English tons per year. Table 5.6–1. Daily CO emissions (kg/day) in the CO nonattainment area from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (winter day). Area Vehicle class Facility type type LDGV LDGT1 LDGT2 HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC TOTAL 1 5,991.2 5,354.6 2,720.8 407.5 3.2 17.1 239.7 91.9 14,825.8 INTERSTATE, 2 48,200.6 43,060.8 21,886.8 3,347.0 25.5 138.3 1,951.6 767.1 119,377.8 FREEWAY, 3 33,329.4 29,777.9 15,132.3 2,345.1 17.7 96.1 1,360.8 543.0 82,602.3 and 4 24,170.7 21,595.1 10,974.0 1,700.7 12.8 69.7 986.8 393.8 59,903.8 EXPRESSWAY 5 14,305.7 12,781.3 6,495.1 1,006.6 7.6 41.3 584.1 233.1 35,454.6 Total 125,997.5 112,569.6 57,209.0 8,806.9 66.7 362.5 5,123.0 2,029.0 312,164.3 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL and MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCAL GRAND TOTALS: 1 4,522.1 4,191.7 2 37,032.9 34,330.1 3 41,487.7 38,408.7 4 29,983.6 27,692.0 5 11,898.3 10,938.8 Total 124,924.7 115,561.4 2,118.7 17,340.3 19,413.5 14,004.1 5,539.7 58,416.2 330.7 2,407.4 2,583.7 1,745.6 655.7 7,723.1 3.2 24.2 26.3 18.0 6.8 78.5 17.3 130.4 140.9 96.2 36.1 420.9 249.5 56.1 11,489.3 1,800.1 412.7 93,478.1 1,918.7 441.8 104,421.3 1,280.9 295.8 75,116.3 471.2 108.4 29,655.1 5,720.5 1,314.9 314,160.1 1 2 3 4 5 Total 4,604.2 11,883.8 7,131.7 3,665.9 3,981.1 31,266.6 4,235.4 10,950.6 6,598.8 3,395.9 3,690.3 28,871.1 2,156.4 5,567.4 3,344.3 1,720.1 1,866.3 14,654.5 544.3 1,349.2 644.0 327.3 312.3 3,177.2 4.2 10.6 5.6 2.9 2.9 26.2 24.2 60.9 31.4 16.0 16.0 148.5 406.5 1,010.4 486.7 247.5 235.9 2,387.1 79.8 200.4 103.4 52.8 52.1 488.5 12,055.1 31,033.3 18,346.0 9,428.4 10,156.9 81,019.7 1 2 3 4 5 Total 925.5 9,438.6 12,156.8 8,008.8 4,056.6 34,586.3 843.7 8,604.2 11,082.1 7,300.8 3,698.0 31,528.9 432.9 4,415.0 5,686.5 3,746.2 1,897.5 16,178.2 141.0 1,437.8 1,851.9 1,220.0 618.0 5,268.8 1.0 9.9 12.7 8.4 4.3 36.3 5.8 58.7 75.6 49.8 25.2 215.2 103.1 1,051.3 1,354.1 892.1 451.9 3,852.5 19.8 202.2 260.5 171.6 86.9 741.0 2,472.8 25,217.9 32,480.2 21,397.8 10,838.4 92,407.2 316,775.2 288,531.0 146,457.9 24,975.9 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 101 207.6 1,147.2 17,083.0 4,573.4 799,751.2 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.6–2. Daily CO emissions (kg day) in Maricopa County from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (winter day). Area Vehicle class Facility type type LDGV LDGT1 LDGT2 HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC TOTAL 1 5,991.2 5,354.6 2,720.8 407.5 3.2 17.1 239.7 91.9 14,825.8 INTERSTATE, 2 48,200.6 43,060.8 21,886.8 3,347.0 25.5 138.3 1,951.6 767.1 119,377.8 FREEWAY, 3 33,329.4 29,777.9 15,132.3 2,345.1 17.7 96.1 1,360.8 543.0 82,602.3 and 4 24,170.7 21,595.1 10,974.0 1,700.7 12.8 69.7 986.8 393.8 59,903.8 EXPRESSWAY 5 30,241.0 27,018.5 13,730.1 2,127.8 16.0 87.2 1,234.7 492.7 74,948.1 Total 141,932.9 126,806.9 64,443.9 9,928.1 75.2 408.5 5,773.6 2,288.6 351,657.8 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL and MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCAL GRAND TOTALS: 1 4,522.1 4,191.7 2 37,032.9 34,330.1 3 41,487.7 38,408.7 4 29,983.6 27,692.0 5 16,658.7 15,315.3 Total 129,685.1 119,937.9 2,118.7 17,340.3 19,413.5 14,004.1 7,756.0 60,632.6 330.7 2,407.4 2,583.7 1,745.6 918.1 7,985.5 3.2 24.2 26.3 18.0 9.5 81.2 17.3 130.4 140.9 96.2 50.5 435.4 249.5 56.1 11,489.3 1,800.1 412.7 93,478.1 1,918.7 441.8 104,421.3 1,280.9 295.8 75,116.3 659.7 151.8 41,519.7 5,909.0 1,358.2 326,024.8 1 2 3 4 5 Total 4,604.2 11,883.8 7,131.7 3,665.9 9,966.4 37,251.9 4,235.4 10,950.6 6,598.8 3,395.9 9,238.5 34,419.2 2,156.4 5,567.4 3,344.3 1,720.1 4,672.2 17,460.4 544.3 1,349.2 644.0 327.3 781.9 3,646.7 4.2 10.6 5.6 2.9 7.3 30.5 24.2 60.9 31.4 16.0 40.0 172.6 406.5 1,010.4 486.7 247.5 590.6 2,741.8 79.8 200.4 103.4 52.8 130.4 566.8 12,055.1 31,033.3 18,346.0 9,428.4 25,427.2 96,290.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total 925.5 9,438.6 12,156.8 8,008.8 6,743.4 37,273.1 843.7 8,604.2 11,082.1 7,300.8 6,147.3 33,978.2 432.9 4,415.0 5,686.5 3,746.2 3,154.3 17,435.0 141.0 1,437.8 1,851.9 1,220.0 1,027.3 5,678.1 1.0 9.9 12.7 8.4 7.1 39.1 5.8 58.7 75.6 49.8 42.0 231.9 103.1 1,051.3 1,354.1 892.1 751.1 4,151.7 19.8 202.2 260.5 171.6 144.5 798.6 2,472.8 25,217.9 32,480.2 21,397.8 18,016.9 99,585.6 346,142.9 315,142.2 159,971.9 27,238.4 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 102 226.0 1,248.3 18,576.1 5,012.3 873,558.1 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.6–3. Daily CO emissions (kg/day) in the CO nonattainment area from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (annual average day). Area Vehicle class Facility type type LDGV LDGT1 LDGT2 HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC TOTAL 1 6,672.5 5,324.0 2,369.5 514.1 3.1 16.2 251.3 121.6 15,272.3 INTERSTATE, 2 53,744.6 42,853.5 19,069.8 4,221.6 25.0 131.0 2,046.2 1,016.3 123,107.9 FREEWAY, 3 37,200.3 29,653.4 13,191.2 2,958.2 17.3 91.0 1,426.2 720.2 85,257.7 and 4 26,977.9 21,504.9 9,566.3 2,145.3 12.6 66.0 1,034.3 522.3 61,829.6 EXPRESSWAY 5 15,967.1 12,727.8 5,661.9 1,269.7 7.4 39.0 612.2 309.1 36,594.3 Total 140,562.4 112,063.6 49,858.8 11,108.9 65.3 343.2 5,370.2 2,689.4 322,061.9 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL and MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCAL GRAND TOTALS: 1 4,748.8 3,987.7 2 39,174.5 32,918.9 3 44,085.6 36,971.2 4 31,703.7 26,556.0 5 12,687.1 10,565.1 Total 132,399.6 110,998.8 1,807.4 14,876.9 16,691.9 11,982.1 4,757.5 50,115.9 417.0 3,037.8 3,258.9 2,202.2 827.1 9,742.9 3.1 23.6 25.7 17.7 6.7 76.8 16.4 123.4 133.4 91.1 34.1 398.5 261.6 72.5 11,314.5 1,887.1 530.1 92,572.3 2,012.0 565.9 103,744.6 1,342.9 377.6 74,273.2 494.1 137.7 29,509.3 5,997.6 1,683.8 311,413.9 1 2 3 4 5 Total 4,739.3 12,222.7 7,339.3 3,774.7 4,116.0 32,192.1 3,919.9 10,132.5 6,154.7 3,167.2 3,465.4 26,839.7 1,796.9 4,641.4 2,805.7 1,443.8 1,574.9 12,262.8 686.6 1,701.3 811.9 412.6 393.7 4,006.1 4.1 10.4 5.5 2.8 2.8 25.6 23.0 57.7 29.8 15.2 15.1 140.7 426.3 1,059.4 510.3 259.5 247.3 2,502.7 105.4 264.0 135.0 68.9 67.6 640.8 11,701.5 30,089.4 17,792.2 9,144.6 9,882.9 78,610.5 1 2 3 4 5 Total 959.8 9,788.6 12,607.5 8,305.8 4,207.0 35,868.7 780.0 7,954.1 10,244.7 6,749.1 3,418.6 29,146.4 360.0 3,670.8 4,727.9 3,114.7 1,577.7 13,451.1 177.9 1,813.8 2,336.1 1,539.0 779.5 6,646.3 1.0 9.7 12.5 8.2 4.2 35.6 5.5 55.6 71.7 47.2 23.9 203.9 108.1 1,102.2 1,419.6 935.2 473.7 4,038.9 26.4 269.6 347.3 228.8 115.9 988.0 2,418.5 24,664.4 31,767.3 20,928.1 10,600.5 90,378.9 341,022.9 279,048.5 125,688.5 31,504.3 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 103 203.3 1,086.3 17,909.5 6,002.0 802,465.3 Maricopa County, AZ Table 5.6–4. Daily CO emissions (kg/day) in Maricopa County from onroad mobile sources by vehicle class, area type and facility type (annual average day). Area Vehicle class Facility type type LDGV LDGT1 LDGT2 HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC TOTAL 1 6,672.5 5,324.0 2,369.5 514.1 3.1 16.2 251.3 121.6 15,272.3 INTERSTATE, 2 53,744.6 42,853.5 19,069.8 4,221.6 25.0 131.0 2,046.2 1,016.3 123,107.9 FREEWAY, 3 37,200.3 29,653.4 13,191.2 2,958.2 17.3 91.0 1,426.2 720.2 85,257.7 and 4 26,977.9 21,504.9 9,566.3 2,145.3 12.6 66.0 1,034.3 522.3 61,829.6 EXPRESSWAY 5 33,753.2 26,905.6 11,968.8 2,684.1 15.7 82.5 1,294.1 653.4 77,357.5 Total 158,348.5 126,241.4 56,165.7 12,523.3 73.6 386.7 6,052.1 3,033.7 362,825.0 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL and MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR LOCAL GRAND TOTALS: 1 4,748.8 3,987.7 2 39,174.5 32,918.9 3 44,085.6 36,971.2 4 31,703.7 26,556.0 5 17,763.0 14,792.0 Total 137,475.6 115,225.8 1,807.4 417.0 14,876.9 3,037.8 16,691.9 3,258.9 11,982.1 2,202.2 6,661.0 1,158.0 52,019.3 10,073.9 3.1 23.6 25.7 17.7 9.3 79.4 16.4 123.4 133.4 91.1 47.8 412.1 261.6 72.5 11,314.5 1,887.1 530.1 92,572.3 2,012.0 565.9 103,744.6 1,342.9 377.6 74,273.2 691.7 192.8 41,315.7 6,195.3 1,738.9 323,220.2 1 2 3 4 5 Total 4,739.3 12,222.7 7,339.3 3,774.7 10,304.2 38,380.3 3,919.9 10,132.5 6,154.7 3,167.2 8,675.3 32,049.7 1,796.9 4,641.4 2,805.7 1,443.8 3,942.6 14,630.5 686.6 1,701.3 811.9 412.6 985.7 4,598.0 4.1 10.4 5.5 2.8 7.1 29.9 23.0 57.7 29.8 15.2 37.9 163.5 426.3 1,059.4 510.3 259.5 619.2 2,874.6 105.4 264.0 135.0 68.9 169.2 742.4 11,701.5 30,089.4 17,792.2 9,144.6 24,741.1 93,468.8 1 2 3 4 5 Total 959.8 9,788.6 12,607.5 8,305.8 6,993.4 38,655.1 780.0 7,954.1 10,244.7 6,749.1 5,682.8 31,410.6 360.0 3,670.8 4,727.9 3,114.7 2,622.6 14,496.0 177.9 1,813.8 2,336.1 1,539.0 1,295.8 7,162.6 1.0 9.7 12.5 8.2 6.9 38.3 5.5 55.6 71.7 47.2 39.8 219.8 108.1 26.4 1,102.2 269.6 1,419.6 347.3 935.2 228.8 787.5 192.6 4,352.7 1,064.8 2,418.5 24,664.4 31,767.3 20,928.1 17,621.4 97,399.8 372,859.4 304,927.4 137,311.5 34,357.8 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 104 221.3 1,182.0 19,474.6 6,579.8 876,913.9 Maricopa County, AZ 5.7 Quality assurance process 5.7.1 VMT estimates Normal quality assurance procedures, including extensive automated consistency checks, were used by ADOT in developing the 2002 HPMS data. These data were submitted to the Federal Highway Administration in October 2003. 5.7.2 Emission factor estimates The quality assurance (QA) process performed on the MOBILE6.2 analyses included accuracy, completeness, and reasonableness checks. For accuracy and completeness, a system was used that included a two-layer, independent reviewer set-up. All hard copy and computer-based data entries as well as all calculations procedures were checked independently for accuracy and completeness by two different reviewers. Any errors found were corrected and the changes were then rechecked by the reviewers. The entire onroad mobile source portion of the 2002 periodic CO inventory was reviewed by MAG staff that did not directly participate in its development. All comments were addressed. 5.7.3 Quality review of 2002 periodic CO emissions inventory The draft onroad mobile source portion of the 2002 periodic carbon monoxide emissions inventory was reviewed using published EPA quality review guidelines for base year emission inventories (EPA Document 450/4-91-022, September 1991). The procedural review (Levels I, II, and III) included checks for completeness, consistency, and the correct use of appropriate procedures. Additionally, the draft onroad mobile source portion of the 2002 periodic carbon monoxide emissions inventory for the carbon monoxide nonattainment area was compared with the onroad mobile source portions of the 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 base year and periodic emissions inventories. The results are in Table 5.7–1. Estimates for Maricopa County in its entirety were not prepared for previous inventories, so no comparison is possible. Table 5.7–1. Comparison of CO emissions from onroad mobile sources and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the CO nonattainment area, 1990–2002. CO emissions from onroad Vehicle miles Year of analysis mobile sources (lb/yr) traveled (VMT) 1990 1,615,410 45,877,773 1993 1,220,223 48,153,240 1996 1,120,508 53,091,273 1999 1,080,829 57,853,980 2002 1,763,151 68,199,542 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 105 Maricopa County, AZ While the VMT increases over time, the modeled onroad CO emissions decrease between 1990 and 1999 because of the implementation of control measures designed to reduce onroad emissions such as I/M program, cleaner gasoline, cleaner vehicle technologies, etc. This decline would have continued if MOBILE5a had been used for the 2002 inventory. Significant increase is modeled between 1999 and 2002 due to the use of MOBILE6.2 in the 2002 analysis versus MOBILE5a in the 1999 and previous analyses. It is also important to note that the base case emissions from the Serious Area CO Plan may not match those in the periodic inventories because of a different year modeled and different modeling domain size. As an additional QA check, the average miles per gallon estimate was derived using average annual daily VMT estimates and gasoline sales from ADOT. The results of that QA check may be found in Appendix 5.5. 5.8 References MAG, 1986. 1986 Phoenix Urbanized Area Travel Speed Study, Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., for MAG, October 1986. MAG, 1990. Phoenix Travel Demand Model Update Project Final Report, MAG, January 1990. MAG, 1995. 1993 Study of Travel Speed and Delay in the MAG Region, Lee Engineering, Inc., for MAG, January 1995. MAG, 1995. Maricopa Association of Governments Highway Performance Monitoring System Update, Lee Engineering, Inc., for MAG, January 1995. MAG, 2000. 1998 MAG Regional Congestion Study, Traffic Research & Analysis, Inc. et al. for MAG, September 2000. Memorandum from Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, on Cutpoints for IM147 for MOBILE6, May 2001. Memorandum from William G. Laxton, US Environmental Protection Agency, OAQPS, on Issues Associated with the 1990 Base Year Emission Inventory and Modeling, December 1991. US DOT, 1987. Highway Performance Monitoring System Field Manual, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, December 1987. US EPA, 1991. Emission Inventory Requirements for Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plans, EPA-450/4-91-011, March 1991. US EPA, 1992. Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation Volume IV: Mobile Sources, EPA-450/4-81-026d (Revised), 1992. US EPA, 1992. Quality Review Guidelines for 1990 Base Year Emission Inventories, EPA454/R-92-007, July 1992. SAI, 1994. Revised Base Case and Demonstration of Attainment for Carbon Monoxide for Maricopa County, Arizona, Systems Applications International, for MAG, February 1994. US EPA, 2003. User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2 (Mobile Source Emission Factor Model), EPA420-R-03-010, August 2003. 2002 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventory 106 Maricopa County, AZ