STATE OF ARIZONA HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2012 PREPARED FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION PREPARED BY ARIZONA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY JANICE K. BREWER GOVERNOR STATE OF ARIZONA ALBERTO C. GUTIER DIRECTOR GOVERNOR’S HIGHWAY SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE MATTHEW D. DERR DEPUTY DIRECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Mission Statement.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 GOHS Organization Chart.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Problem Identification Overview................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Highway Safety Plan Process – Grant Proposal Process........................................................................................................................... 7 Program and Project Development........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Components of the Highway Safety Plan............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Funding......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Goals and Performance Measures.............................................................................................................................................................................. 12 FFY 2012 Performance Measures........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Traffic Safety Performance (Core Outcome) Measures For Arizona ............................................................................................ 19 State Certifications and Assurances........................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Planning and Administration......................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Accident Investigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 Equipment...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Training ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Alcohol and Other Drugs................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 Enforcement.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 47 Education ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 48 Public Awareness....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Emergency Medical Services.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 57 Equipment...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Training ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 57 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 3 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Motorcycle Safety................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Occupant Protection ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60 Enforcement.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 Education ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 Enforcement.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 Public Awareness....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Police Traffic Services.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 68 Enforcement.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 68 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Roadway Safety....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Traffic Records......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Program Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Performance Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73 Tasks......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Program Cost Summary.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 Equipment .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 86 4 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan INTRODUCTION The Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (“GOHS”) produces this annual Highway Safety Plan (“HSP”) to serve as the guide for the implementation of highway safety projects throughout Arizona and as the application for funding through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”). Projects are funded to meet specific highway safety goals and performance measures as enumerated in this document, and are based on state and national traffic safety data, including data on crashes, fatalities, injuries and citations to ensure that projects are focused on areas of greatest need in the state. Arizona’s HSP is developed through annual problem identification and analysis of traffic records, citations, convictions, judicial outcome, incarcerations, assessments, screening, treatment, prevention, and surveys. The three leading causes of death from vehicular collisions in Arizona are alcohol impairment, speed too fast for conditions and unrestrained occupants in vehicles. Consequently, the majority of funding in the FY 2012 HSP is devoted to these three program areas – Alcohol, Police Traffic Services and Occupant Protection. Through the Director of the Governor's Office of Highway Safety, a channel of communication and understanding has been developed between the Governor's Office, the Legislature, state agencies, political subdivisions, and community groups concerning all aspects of the statewide highway safety program. Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-602 authorizes GOHS as the appropriate agency to administer highway safety programs in the State. Executive Order 2004-24 designates the GOHS as the State Highway Safety Agency (“SHSA”) and, as such, the appropriate agency to administer the HSP on behalf of the Governor. Problem identification involves the study of relationships between crashes and the characteristics of population, licensed drivers, registered vehicles, and vehicle miles traveled. Drivers can be classified into subgroups according to age, sex, etc. Vehicles can be divided into subgroups according to year, make, body style, etc. Roads can be divided into subgroups according to number of lanes, type of surface, political subdivision, etc. Crashes can be further analyzed in terms of the time, day of the week, month; age and sex of drivers; primary crash factors; and use of safety equipment. Other factors also influence motor vehicle crashes and should be considered in conducting comparative analyses between jurisdictions. For example, variations in composition of population, modes of transportation, the highway system, economic conditions, climate, and the effective strength of law enforcement agencies can be influential. The selection of crash comparisons requires the exercise of judgment. MISSION STATEMENT GOHS is the focal point for highway safety issues in Arizona. GOHS provides leadership by developing, promoting, and coordinating programs; influencing public and private policy; and increasing public awareness of highway safety. 5 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOHS ORGANIZATION CHART Janice K. Brewer Governor Alberto Gutier Director Mari Hembeck Executive Assistant Lizette Pena Admin. Asst. II Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Representative, PIO and Procurement Officer Maria Sanchez IT/Project Coordinator Beth Barnes PHX Prosecutor/ TSRP John Butler Grants Manager Michelle Jimenez Project Coordinator Benjamin Deemer Project Coordinator Matthew Derr Deputy Director Michelle Cota Project Coordinator Bridget Reutter Impaired Driving Coordinator VACANT Lori Boncoskey Chief Financial Officer Dannie Maynard Fiscal Specialist 6 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan VACANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION OVERVIEW HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN PROCESS – GRANT PROPOSAL PROCESS PROGRAM AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT In FY 2011, GOHS advanced the grant cycle five months and as a result of this accomplishment, in FFY 2012, GOHS will be able to fund grants at the beginning of the FFY on October 1, 2011. Programs starting on October 1 will be funded utilizing available carry forward funding until such a time that GOHS receives current year Section 402 funding from Congress. In November of each year, a letter outlining the Proposal Process and priority program areas is sent out to political subdivisions, state and non-profit agencies regarding the GOHS Proposal Process. All statewide law enforcement and 7 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan non-profit agencies are encouraged to take an active part in Arizona's Highway Safety Program. In addition to the written notification, the letter and Proposal Guide are posted on the GOHS website. Proposals are due to the GOHS through the GOHS e-grants system in mid-February. Each proposal is assigned a number and pertinent information is added to an Excel spreadsheet. Meetings with the GOHS Director, Executive Assistant, Deputy Director, Comptroller, Grant Coordinator, and Project Coordinators to review each proposal begin in March and last through April. During these meetings each proposal is discussed and level of funding is determined. These discussions include the following evaluation criteria:     Is the proposal allowable and fundable? Does the proposal address one or more of the priority areas identified in the Proposal Letter? Did the submitting agency follow the guidelines set forth in the Proposal Guide? Did they provide statistical data, cover letter signed by agency head, etc.? Has the agency been included in the HSP before? If yes, how did they perform? Were narrative and financial reports completed in accordance with contractual requirements? When evaluating grant applications, GOHS bases decisions on an agency’s past performance. If an agency exhibits poor performance – operationally or financially – it will be less likely to receive funding. Conversely, GOHS rewards top performing agencies with funding. GOHS requires grantees requesting $100,000 or greater or nonprofits applicants to make formal presentations before GOHS staff. These presentations present an overview of the request with background on the agency. This process allows the GOHS Director and staff to ask questions of the grantee and helps GOHS better assess the grant application. GOHS Grants Philosophy: Grants for Performance It is the policy of GOHS to fund all proposals that meet the listed criteria. This ensures that the entire state is represented in the HSP. Once the grants and funding levels are determined by program area, Project Coordinators begin work on writing contracts so they can be mailed to grantees by early September. During this time period, the Director, Deputy Director, Grant Manager and Comptroller begin development of the HSP. Figure 1Grant presentation by Mesa Police Department to GOHS Staff. Agencies review their grant contracts in September and gain approval (if necessary) from their appropriate governing board and council. Once completed, the GOHS Director signs the contract and the agency can begin incurring costs pursuant to the grant contract – with the goal of contracts beginning on October 1. 8 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOHS relies on the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division, Traffic Records Section and the NCSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (“FARS”) for the data contained in the HSP. COMPONENTS OF THE HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN  Alcohol and Other Drugs (AL) - To reduce the number and severity of crashes in which alcohol and / or drugs are contributing factors.  Occupant Protection (OP) - To increase the statewide seat belt / child safety seat (CSS) usage rate of motor vehicle occupants and to increase public information and education of the benefits of seat belt / CSS usage for adults and children.  Police Traffic Services (PT) - To achieve and maintain compliance with traffic laws such as aggressive driving, speeding and red light running. Enforcement must be consistent, impartial and uniformly applied to all street and highway users.  Traffic Records (TR) -To develop a comprehensive data processing system that brings together the engineering, enforcement, educational, medical, behavioral health, prosecution, judicial, correctional, and emergency response disciplines.  Emergency Medical Services (EM) - To support rural first responders with emergency medical services (EMS) equipment.  Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Safety (MC/PS) - To increase the public's awareness and understanding of and participation in motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian safety.  Roadway Safety (RS) -To improve traffic conditions in identified corridors and local jurisdictions by funding minor traffic engineering improvements, correcting signing deficiencies and promoting safety programs. ARIZONA’S FFY 2012 HSP IS:  A working document that is revised throughout the year to accommodate changes to existing programs or to introduce new or additional programs.  A statewide overview and detailed summaries of traffic safety data as well as project/program descriptions, objectives, costs, and time frames.  Operational during FFY 2012 which commences October 1, 2011 and ends September 30, 2012.  A budget for the allocation of available funding.  The opportunity by which the State of Arizona is able to secure federal highway safety funds under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). 9 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan FUNDING Funding for FY 2012 is estimated based on allocated amounts from prior years plus carry forward funding. For FY 2012, GOHS is utilizing carry forward Section 410 High Fatality funding for some projects. As was done in FY 2011, additional carry forward funding will be utilized to fund projects as they come up through the course of the year through revisions to the Highway Safety Plan. Carry forward funding will fund Section 402 grants until receipt of full Section 402 funding from Congress. The amounts listed below are estimated as of the date this Highway Safety Plan was finalized. Program Area 402 408 410 410-HF 2010 Total HSP Funding Awarded Amount $ 4,100,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,053,648 $ 0 $ 111,200 Estimated Carry Forward1 $ 1,639,515 $ 192,354 $ 2,206,2522 $ 0 $ 157,890 Amount Funded in HSP $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,686,251 500,000 2,070,983 185,000 200,000 6,642,234 1 Estimated Carry Forward Amount was based on GOHS estimates of programmatic expenditures, actual carry forward funding will differ. Amount includes 410, 410 High Visibility and 410 High Fatality Carry Forward Funds. 2 Funding by Program Area 410-HF, $185,000 2010, $200,000 410, $2,070,983 402, $3,686,251 408, $500,000 10 Funding | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Funding by Program Area RS, $42,546 PT, $1,194,156 PA, $320,000 AI, $177,403 PS, $134,963 OP, $692,393 MS, $210,000 EM, $79,155 AL, $3,241,697 TR, $549,921 Funding by Program Area RS, 0.64% PT, 18.09% PA, 4.85% AI, 2.69% PS, 2.05% OP, 10.49% MS, 3.18% EM, 1.20% TR, 8.33% AL, 49.12% 11 Funding | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The primary highway safety goal for Arizona is to reduce fatalities across all program areas. The data utilized for the FFY 2012 HSP comes from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (“FARS”) and the Arizona Department of Transportation Traffic Records Section (“ADOT”). The 2010 data received from ADOT indicates that there were 762 fatalities in Arizona. This represents a 5.46% decrease in overall fatalities from 2009 (806 to 762). Arizona Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Month (Source: ADOT) 55 57 70 62 77 51 65 70 61 64 68 62 2011 TOTAL 56 55 68 42 34 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 2011 URBAN 30 32 31 20 21 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 2011 RURAL 26 23 37 22 13 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 806 762 282 152 130 1.34 1.27 N/A MONTH 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 101 97 95 90 93 98 99 93 92 102 86 86 85 76 85 91 111 84 93 99 97 102 107 95 82 86 91 114 99 87 88 115 105 92 102 98 101 90 112 108 81 101 129 114 70 101 98 88 92 78 112 138 120 106 130 119 118 115 92 81 63 82 91 113 89 95 97 87 97 88 92 77 68 84 90 85 87 67 85 88 91 73 66 54 64 63 61 88 70 89 60 61 64 57 66 63 TOTAL FATALITY RATE* 1,132 1,125 1,159 1,193 1,301 1,071 938 2.18 2.11 2.02 2.03 2.08 1.70 1.52 Fatality Rate per 100 MM VMT Data: ADOT 2.50 Rate per 100 Million VMT 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Fatality Rate per 100 MM VMT 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2.18 2.11 2.02 2.03 2.08 1.70 1.52 1.34 1.27 12 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Total Fatalities Data: ADOT 1400 1200 Fatalities 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Fatalities 1057 1132 1125 1159 1193 1301 1071 938 806 762 Annual Trends in Total Fatalities Data: ADOT 15.00% Annual Percentage Change 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% -10.00% -15.00% -20.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 % Change Total Fatalities 1.93% 7.10% -0.62% 3.02% 2.93% 9.05% -17.68 -12.42 -14.07 -5.46% 13 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Total Fatalities and Fatality Rate Data: ADOT 1400 3.00 1200 2.50 2.00 800 1.50 600 Fatality Rate Total Fatalities 1000 1.00 400 200 0.50 0 0.00 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Fatalities VMT Population,Licensed Drivers, Registered Vehicles, Vehicle Miles Traveled 7,000,000 70,000 6,000,000 60,000 5,000,000 50,000 4,000,000 40,000 3,000,000 30,000 2,000,000 20,000 1,000,000 10,000 0 Vehicle MilesTraveled People Data: ADOT 0 2002 LICENSED DRIVERS* 2003 2004 2005 REGISTERED VEHICLES* 2006 2007 2008 TOTAL POPULATION** 2009 2010 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED*** 14 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities by Year Data: FARS 1,400 1,200 1,000 Fatalities 800 600 400 200 - 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1,151 1,179 1,293 1,071 938 807 Alcohol Fatalities 334 375 399 337 262 219 Speeding Fatalities 408 519 584 452 389 283 Total Fatalities Year Total Fatalities Alcohol Fatalities Alcohol Fatalities Percent 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010* 1151 1179 1293 1071 938 807 762 334 375 399 337 262 219 223 29% 32% 31% 31% 28% 27% 29% Year to Year Percentage Change Alcohol Fatalities Year to Year Percentage Change Total Fatalities 12.28% 6.40% -15.54% -22.26% --16.41% 1.83% 2.43% 9.67% -17.17% -12.42% -13.97% -5.46% * 2010 Data is from ADOT, 2010 Arizona Crash Facts Summary. All other data is from FARS. 15 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities Data: FARS 450 400 350 Fatalities 300 250 200 150 100 50 Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities (BAC=.08+) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 334 375 399 337 262 219 Annual Trends in Alcohol Fatalities Data: FARS 15.00% Annual Percentage Change 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% -10.00% -15.00% -20.00% -25.00% % Change Alcohol Fatalities 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 12.28% 6.40% -15.54% -22.26% -16.41% 16 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan FFY 2012 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Pursuant to 23 CFR 1200.10(a)(1), GOHS is including 10 Core Outcome Performance Measures and 1 Core Behavior Measure in the FFY 2012 HSP. The data for the Performance Measures comes from FARS, unless otherwise noted. CORE OUTCOME MEASURES (10) Traffic Fatalities (FARS) C-1) To decrease traffic fatalities seven percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 939 to 873 by December 31, 2012. Serious Traffic Injuries (State Crash Data Files) C-2) To decrease serious traffic injuries 10 percent from the 2008-2010 calendar base year average of 53,657 injuries to 48,291 injuries by December 31, 2012. Fatalities/VMT (FARS/FHWA) C-3a) To decrease total fatalities/VMT five percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 1.51 to 1.43 by December 31, 2012. C-3b) To decrease rural fatalities/VMT five percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 2.51 to 2.38 by December 31, 2012. C-3c) To decrease urban fatalities/VMT five percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 1.08 to 1.03 by December 31, 2012. Unrestrained Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities (FARS) C-4) To decrease unrestrained passenger vehicle occupant fatalities in all seating positions eight percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 313 to 288 by December 31, 2012. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities (FARS) C-5) To decrease alcohol impaired driving fatalities 10 percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 273 to 245 by December 31, 2012. Speeding Related Fatalities (FARS) C-6) To decrease speeding-related fatalities 10 percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 375 to 337 by December 31, 2012. 17 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Motorcyclist Fatalities (FARS) C-7) To decrease motorcycle fatalities two percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 132 to 130 by December 31, 2011. Unhelmeted Motorcyclist Fatalities (FARS) C-8) To decrease unhelmeted motorcyclist fatalities four percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 68 to 65 by December 31, 2012. Drivers Age 20 or Younger Involved in Fatal Crashes (FARS) C-9) To decrease drivers age 20 or younger involved in fatal crashes 10 percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 142 to 128 by December 31, 2012. Pedestrian Fatalities (FARS) C-10) To reduce pedestrian fatalities eight percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 132 to 121 by December 31, 2012. CORE BEHAVIOR MEASURE (1) Seat Belt Use Rate (Observed Seat Belt Use Survey) B-1) To increase statewide observed seat belt use of front seat outboard occupants in passenger vehicles one percentage point from the 2009-2011 calendar base year average usage rate of 81.83 percent to 82.83 percent by December 31, 2012. 18 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TRAFFIC SAFETY PERFORMANCE (CORE OUTCOME) MEASURES FOR ARIZONA Core Outcome Measures Year 2004 Traffic Fatalities 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total 1,151 1,179 1,293 1,071 938 807 Rural 594 536 650 516 474 418 Urban 546 643 641 555 464 387 Unknown 11 0 2 0 0 2 Total 2.01 1.97 2.07 1.70 1.52 1.31 Rural 3.42 3.06 3.27 2.63 2.6 2.29 Urban 1.37 1.52 1.51 1.28 1.07 0.89 Total 799 739 868 699 595 460 Restrained 276 254 277 238 201 160 Unrestrained 424 406 469 379 330 240 Unknown 99 79 122 82 64 60 Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities (BAC = .08+)** 334 375 399 337 266 219 Speeding-Related Fatalities 408 519 584 452 389 283 Total 119 138 142 135 141 121 Helmeted 35 58 45 54 67 50 Unhelmeted 76 74 91 71 68 64 Unknown 8 6 6 10 6 7 1,506 1,578 1,720 1,430 1,243 981 7 2 3 3 2 1 Aged 15-20 206 210 222 177 151 93 Aged Under 21 213 212 225 180 153 94 1,213 1,290 1,412 1,205 1,051 835 80 76 83 45 39 52 130 158 167 154 121 120 Fatalities Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Driven Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities (All Seat Positions) Motorcyclist Fatalities Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes Total Aged Under 15 Aged 21 and Over Unknown Age Pedestrian Fatalities Year Daytime Front Seat Passenger Vehicle Occupants (Observed) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 93.90% 78.90% 80.90% 79.90% 80.80% 81.80% 19 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Seatbelt and Child Restraint Usage 100% 90% 80% 70% Percent 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Seat Belt Usage '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 53.2% 58.0% 54.6% 63.4% 58.3% 71.1% 75.2% 74.4% 73.8% 85.8% 95.3% 93.3% 78.9% 80.9% 79.9% 80.8% 81.8% 82.9% Child Restraint Usage 36.9% 39.5% 44.9% 75.6% 80.1% 87.0% 71.7% 72.0% 71.4% 89.7% 97.6% 95.2% 88.4% 86.2% 80.1% 87.2% 78.0% 79.1% 20 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Fatality Rates: Arizona, U.S. and Best State Fatalities 1,151 42,836 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled (Millions) 57,336 2,964,788 1,179 43,510 59,799 2,989,430 1,293 42,708 62,468 3,014,371 1,071 41,259 62,963 3,032,399 937 37,261 61,628 2,973,509 807 33,808 61,628 2,953,501 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Fatalities Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled 2.01 1.44 0.87 1.97 1.46 0.80 2.07 1.42 0.78 1.70 1.36 0.79 1.52 1.25 0.67 1.31 1.14 0.61 Total Population 5,750,475 292,892,127 5,961,239 295,560,549 6,178,251 298,362,973 6,353,421 301,290,332 6,500,180 304,059,724 6,595,778 307,006,550 Fatalities Per 100,000 Population 20.02 14.63 7.39 19.78 14.72 6.85 20.93 14.31 6.32 16.86 13.69 6.55 14.41 12.25 5.59 12.24 11.01 4.84 21 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities By The Highest Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) in the Crash Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Total Fatalities in all Crashes 1,151 42,836 Highest BAC level in the Crash BAC = .01+ BAC = .08+ Number 446 16,919 1,179 43,510 508 17,590 1,293 42,708 578 17,738 1,071 41,259 466 17,158 937 37,261 393 15,438 807 33,808 323 14,188 Percent 39 39 25 43 40 14 45 42 24 44 42 24 42 41 21 40 42 23 Number 385 14,593 446 15,102 480 15,144 403 14,603 328 13,294 280 12,233 Percent 33 34 21 38 35 12 37 35 20 38 35 21 35 36 16 35 36 18 Per 100 Million VMT 0.67 0.49 0.27 0.75 0.51 0.14 0.77 0.50 0.22 0.64 0.48 0.23 0.53 0.45 0.16 0.45 0.41 0.16 22 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Alcohol-Impaired Driving Total Fatalities (BAC = .08+) Per Fatalities 100 in all Million Crashes Number Percent VMT Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State 1,151 42,836 334 13,099 1,179 43,510 375 13,582 1,293 42,708 399 13,491 1,071 41,259 337 13,041 937 37,261 266 11,773 Arizona US Best State 807 33,808 219 10,839 29 31 20 32 31 12 31 32 18 31 32 19 28 32 16 27 32 16 0.58 0.44 0.25 0.63 0.45 0.13 0.64 0.45 0.20 0.54 0.43 0.21 0.43 0.40 0.16 0.36 0.37 0.15 23 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan BAC Reporting Rates for Drivers/Operators Involved in Fatal Crashes Surviving Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Killed Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Total Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Alcohol Alcohol Alcohol Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent 897 31,524 57 8,215 609 26,871 299 18,275 1,506 58,395 356 26,490 928 31,729 52 7,415 650 27,491 321 18,773 1,578 59,220 373 26,188 1,018 30,498 252 7,482 702 27,348 491 18,911 1,720 57,846 743 26,393 851 29,449 246 7,631 579 26,570 457 19,434 1,430 56,019 703 27,065 717 26,011 190 6,677 519 24,175 332 17,045 1,236 50,186 522 23,722 554 23,432 155 6,372 427 21,798 246 15,505 981 45,230 401 21,877 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State 6 26 80 6 23 77 25 25 81 29 26 82 26 26 80 28 27 86 49 68 97 49 68 98 70 69 99 79 73 100 64 71 95 58 71 97 24 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 24 45 82 24 44 84 43 46 85 49 48 84 42 47 84 41 48 90 Daytime Front Seat Restraint Use Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Fatalities - Restrained Percent Fatalities - Restrained Percent 51 56 82 52 55 88 45 55 77 50 57 82 51 56 78 51 58 77 95 80 95 94 82 95 79 81 96 81 82 98 80 83 97 81 84 98 25 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities Age 5 and Above Lives Saved Estimates Fatalities Age 5 and Above Additional Lives Savable Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Restrained Unrestrained Unknown Restraint Use 775 731 845 681 575 448 269 250 268 226 193 152 408 403 465 375 318 238 98 78 112 80 64 58 Percent Known Restrained Lives Saved at Current Belt Use 40 38 37 38 38 39 376 346 366 298 260 217 at 100% Belt Usage 47 54 175 135 113 91 Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities Age 4 and Below Percent Known Restrained Lives Saved Estimates Lives Saved at Current Seat Belt and Child Safety Seat Usage 50 67 69 79 89 6 5 13 20 11 Fatalities Age 4 and Under Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Restrained Unrestrained Unknown Restraint Use 10 6 16 15 10 5 4 9 11 8 5 2 4 3 1 0 0 3 1 1 26 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Motorcyclist Fatalities by Helmet Use Fatalities Lives Saved Estimates Total Helmeted 119 138 142 135 121 35 58 45 54 50 Unhelmeted Unknown Helmet Use Percent Known Helmeted Additional Lives Savable Lives Saved at 100% at Current Helmet Helmet Use Usage 76 74 91 71 64 8 6 6 10 7 32 44 33 43 44 22 36 29 35 32 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 31 29 35 29 25 Fatalities by Person Type Person Type Occupants 2007 2008 2009 # % # % # % # % # % Passenger Car 396 34 353 30 425 33 357 33 299 32 209 26 Light Truck - Pickup 176 15 175 15 212 16 167 16 130 14 88 11 Light Truck - Utility 153 13 139 12 171 13 140 13 132 14 120 15 71 6 71 6 57 4 35 3 34 4 43 5 3 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 15 1 21 2 20 2 19 2 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 53 5 88 7 62 5 34 3 37 4 60 7 Total Occupants 871 76 842 71 951 74 753 70 651 69 536 66 Total Motorcyclists 119 10 138 12 142 11 135 13 141 15 121 15 130 11 158 13 167 13 154 14 121 13 120 15 27 2 35 3 29 2 21 2 19 2 25 3 4 0 6 1 4 0 8 1 6 1 5 1 161 14 199 17 200 15 183 17 146 15 150 19 1,151 100 1,179 100 1,293 100 1,071 100 938 100 807 100 Large Truck Bus Other/Unknown Occupants Pedestrian Bicyclist and Other Cyclist Other/Unknown Nonoccupants Total Nonoccupants Totals: 2006 % Light Truck - Other Nonoccupants 2005 # Light Truck - Van Motorcyclists 2004 27 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities by Crash Type Crash Type Total Fatalities (All Crashes)* (1) Single Vehicle (2) Involving a Large Truck (3) Involving Speeding (4) Involving a Rollover (5) Involving a Roadway Departure (6) Involving an Intersection (or Intersection Related) 2004 1,151 662 106 408 462 562 236 2005 1,179 661 118 519 417 526 268 2006 1,293 701 136 584 495 535 318 2007 1,071 615 98 452 413 506 269 2008 938 558 98 389 356 425 234 Motorcyclist Fatalities by Age Age Year <20 20 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 >59 Totals 2004 14 23 20 31 26 5 119 2005 13 34 26 29 24 12 138 2006 13 34 23 28 33 11 142 2007 12 22 28 35 23 15 135 2008 3 36 20 30 27 25 141 2009 2 11 23 27 29 28 1 Motorcyclist Fatalities per 100,000 Registered Motorcyclists Motorcycle Fatalities Per Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total 100,000 Motorcyclist Motorcycle Motorcycle Fatalities 119 138 142 135 141 121 Registrations 209,048 98,703 114,443 125,219 134,434 138,475 Registrations 56.92 139.8 124.1 107.8 104.9 87.38 28 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 2009 807 506 66 283 276 345 165 Fatalities by Person Type and Race/Hispanic Origin Person Type by Race/Hispanic Origin 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Hispanic 266 311 347 266 220 White, Non-Hispanic 440 374 538 463 435 Black, Non-Hispanic 26 28 26 28 25 American Indian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 82 108 107 107 84 Asian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 4 5 4 2 5 Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 0 1 0 0 0 Multiple Races, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 0 1 0 0 0 All Other Non-Hispanic Races 13 143 61 18 15 Unknown Race and Unknown Hispanic 159 9 10 4 8 Total 990 980 1,093 888 792 Non-Occupants Hispanic 47 60 64 54 35 (Pedestrians, Pedalcyclists and White, Non-Hispanic 57 65 80 87 70 Other/Unknown Non-Occupants) Black, Non-Hispanic 0 6 5 5 9 American Indian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 19 29 34 33 29 Asian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 0 1 0 2 0 Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 Multiple Races, Non-Hispanic/Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Non-Hispanic Races 0 37 15 0 1 Unknown Race and Unknown Hispanic 38 1 2 2 2 161 199 200 183 146 1,151 1,179 1,293 1,071 938 Occupants (All Vehicle Types) Total Totals: 29 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 5-Year Trend for the Top 10 Counties of 2008 - Fatalities Fatalities Counties by 2008 Ranking 2004 2005 2006 Percent of Total 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 Maricopa County 458 524 564 461 368 307 40 44 44 43 39 38 2 Pima County 148 137 154 129 137 92 13 12 12 12 15 11 3 Pinal County 94 84 131 86 81 75 8 7 10 8 9 9 4 Yavapai County 79 73 72 59 41 46 7 6 6 6 4 6 5 Navajo County 51 45 41 56 36 44 4 4 3 5 4 5 6 Mohave County 53 61 61 52 57 42 5 5 5 5 6 5 7 Coconino County 58 62 82 56 51 40 5 5 6 5 5 5 8 Cochise County 53 47 35 21 33 39 5 4 3 2 4 5 9 Apache County 54 32 33 50 45 32 5 3 3 5 5 4 10 Yuma County 27 37 37 31 26 25 2 3 3 3 3 3 Sub Total 1. Top Ten Counties 1,076 1,105 1,210 1,009 875 742 94 94 94 94 93 92 Sub Total 2. All Other Counties 74 73 83 62 62 64 6 6 6 6 7 8 1,150 1,178 1,293 1,071 938 806 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total All Counties 30 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 5 Year Trend for the Top 10 Counties of 2009 – Fatalities Year to Year Percent Change Percent Change From Fatalities Previous Year Counties by 2008 Ranking 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 Maricopa County 458 524 564 461 368 307 14 8 -18 -20 -17 2 Pima County 148 137 154 129 137 92 -7 12 -16 6 -33 3 Pinal County 94 84 131 86 81 75 -11 56 -34 -6 -7 4 Yavapai County 79 73 72 59 41 46 -8 -1 -18 -31 12 5 Navajo County 51 45 41 56 36 44 -12 -9 37 -36 22 6 Mohave County 53 61 61 52 57 42 15 0 -15 10 -26 7 Coconino County 58 62 82 56 51 40 7 32 -32 -9 -22 8 Cochise County 53 47 35 21 33 39 -11 -26 -40 57 18 9 Apache County 54 32 33 50 45 32 -41 3 52 -10 -29 10 Yuma County 27 37 37 31 26 25 37 0 -16 -16 -4 Sub Total 1. Top Ten Counties 1,076 1,105 1,210 1,009 875 742 3 10 -17 -13 -15 Sub Total 2. All Other Counties 74 73 83 62 63 64 -1 14 -25 0 2 Total All Counties 1,150 1,178 1,293 1,071 938 806 2 10 -17 -12 -14 31 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 5-Year Trend For the Top 10 Counties of 2008 - Fatality Rates Counties by 2009 Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sub Total 1. Sub Total 2. Total La Paz County Apache County Navajo County Santa Cruz County Gila County Coconino County Cochise County Graham County Greenlee County Pinal County Top Ten Counties All Other Counties All Counties 2004 142.64 79.48 48.56 Fatalities Per 100,000 Population 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 174.94 46.89 42.07 31.62 35.35 49.68 37.41 24.52 27.43 134.21 47.78 37.61 38.06 42.61 65.06 27.61 30.04 107.17 144.04 72.17 50.45 18.74 45.95 43.94 16.44 23.03 12.89 99.98 64.73 32.04 20.87 44.00 39.71 25.70 22.10 37.23 89.95 45.33 38.95 38.84 32.57 30.81 30.11 26.99 24.87 42.63 35.37 48.44 28.42 24.62 22.00 45.44 40.57 45.01 36.64 33.06 31.11 13.86 14.70 15.10 12.38 10.72 9.06 20.00 19.72 20.88 16.83 14.43 12.22 47.06 43.05 27.75 32 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan STATE CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Failure to comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations and directives may subject State officials to civil or criminal penalties and/or place the State in a high risk grantee status in accordance with 49 CFR 18.12. Each fiscal year the State will sign these Certifications and Assurances that the State complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include, but not limited to, the following: 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 - Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments 23 CFR Chapter II - (§§1200, 1205, 1206, 1250, 1251, & 1252) Regulations governing highway safety programs NHTSA Order 462-6C - Matching Rates for State and Community Highway Safety Programs Highway Safety Grant Funding Policy for Field-Administered Grants Section 402 Requirements The Governor is responsible for the administration of the State highway safety program through a State highway safety agency which has adequate powers and is suitably equipped and organized (as evidenced by appropriate oversight procedures governing such areas as procurement, financial administration, and the use, management, and disposition of equipment) to carry out the program (23 USC 402(b) (1) (A)); The political subdivisions of this State are authorized, as part of the State highway safety program, to carry out within their jurisdictions local highway safety programs which have been approved by the Governor and are in accordance with the uniform guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Transportation (23 USC 402(b) (1) (B)); At least 40 percent of all Federal funds apportioned to this State under 23 USC 402 for this fiscal year will be expended by or for the benefit of the political subdivision of the State in carrying out local highway safety programs (23 USC 402(b) (1) (C)), unless this requirement is waived in writing; This State's highway safety program provides adequate and reasonable access for the safe and convenient movement of physically handicapped persons, including those in wheelchairs, across curbs constructed or replaced on or after July 1, 1976, at all pedestrian crosswalks (23 USC 402(b) (1) (D)); The State will implement activities in support of national highway safety goals to reduce motor vehicle related fatalities that also reflect the primary data-related crash factors within the State as identified by the State highway safety planning process, including: National law enforcement mobilizations, Sustained enforcement of statutes addressing impaired driving, occupant protection, and driving in excess of posted speed limits, 33 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan An annual statewide safety belt use survey in accordance with criteria established by the Secretary for the measurement of State safety belt use rates to ensure that the measurements are accurate and representative, Development of statewide data systems to provide timely and effective data analysis to support allocation of highway safety resources. The State shall actively encourage all relevant law enforcement agencies in the State to follow the guidelines established for vehicular pursuits issued by the International Association of Chiefs of Police that are currently in effect. (23 USC 402 (b)(1)(E). Other Federal Requirements Cash drawdowns will be initiated only when actually needed for disbursement. 49 CFR 18.20 Cash disbursements and balances will be reported in a timely manner as required by NHTSA. 49 CFR 18.21. The same standards of timing and amount, including the reporting of cash disbursement and balances, will be imposed upon any secondary recipient organizations. 49 CFR 18.41. Failure to adhere to these provisions may result in the termination of drawdown privileges. The State has submitted appropriate documentation for review to the single point of contact designated by the Governor to review Federal programs, as required by Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs); Equipment acquired under this agreement for use in highway safety program areas shall be used and kept in operation for highway safety purposes by the State; or the State, by formal agreement with appropriate officials of a political subdivision or State agency, shall cause such equipment to be used and kept in operation for highway safety purposes 23 CFR 1200.21 The State will comply with all applicable State procurement procedures and will maintain a financial management system that complies with the minimum requirements of 49 CFR 18.20; Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act The State will report for each sub-grant awarded: Name of the entity receiving the award; Amount of the award; Information on the award including transaction type, funding agency, the North American Industry Classification System code or Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number (where applicable), program source; Location of the entity receiving the award and the primary location of performance under the award, including the city, State, congressional district, and country; , and an award title descriptive of the purpose of each funding action; A unique identifier (DUNS); 34 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan The names and total compensation of the five most highly compensated officers of the entity receiving the award and of the parent entity of the recipient, should the entity be owned by another entity; (i) the entity in the preceding fiscal year received— (I) 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and(II) $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and(ii) the public does not have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; Other relevant information specified by the Office of Management and Budget in subsequent guidance or regulation. The State highway safety agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin (and 49 CFR Part 21); (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101, et seq.; PL 101-336), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities (and 49 CFR Part 27); (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970(P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse of alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, which provides that any portion of a state or local entity receiving federal funds will obligate all programs or activities of that entity to comply with these civil rights laws; and, (k) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. The Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988(41 U.S.C. 702;): The State will provide a drug-free workplace by: a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: 1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace. 2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. 3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. 35 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace. c. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a). d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will 1. Abide by the terms of the statement. 2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. e. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. f. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted 1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination. 2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. g. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) above. Buy America Act The State will comply with the provisions of the Buy America Act (49 U.S.C. 5323(j)) which contains the following requirements: Only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States may be purchased with Federal funds unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestic purchases would be inconsistent with the public interest; that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality; or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. Clear justification for the purchase of non-domestic items must be in the form of a waiver request submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation. 36 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Political Activity (Hatch Act) The State will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Certification Regarding Federal Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subaward at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Restriction on State Lobbying None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal. 37 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension Instructions for Primary Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. 2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction. 3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 5. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meaning set out in the Definitions and coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification , in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each 38 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan participant may, but is not required to, check the list of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. 9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of record, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Instructions for Lower Tier Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 39 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definition and Coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that is it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. (See below) 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions: 1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. 2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 40 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Policy to Ban Text Messaging While Driving In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to: Adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving including policies to ban text messaging while driving— Company-owned or –rented vehicles, or Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles; or Privately-owned when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. Conduct workplace safety iniatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as – Establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving; and Education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. 42 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM GOAL: TO EFFICIENTLY AND EFFECTIVELY MANAGE ARIZONA’S HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Planning and Administration (“PA”) program area includes those activities and costs necessary for the overall management and operations of the Arizona GOHS. The Director of the GOHS is responsible for Arizona’s Highway Safety Program and serves as the Governor’s Highway Safety Representative. As the Governor’s representative, the GOHS Director participates in activities that impact the highway safety programs and policies nationwide. GOHS staff activities include, grant writing, monitoring and auditing, evaluating project accomplishments, preparing reports for the GOHS Director and coordinate training opportunities. PERFORMANCE PLAN It is the goal of the Planning and Administration Program to provide the management, supervision, and support services for the activities necessary to operate the Highway Safety Program in the State of Arizona. The performance measures to support this goal include:       Process all grants to subgrantees by start of Federal Fiscal Year on October 1. Monitor all grants according to the GOHS monitoring policy. Develop a coordinated Highway Safety Plan (HSP) by September 1 of each calendar year. Develop, coordinate, monitor and evaluate traffic safety projects identified in the HSP. Promote highway safety awareness through educational programs and public awareness campaigns. Prepare the Annual Report by December 31st of each calendar year. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety to coordinate and monitor activities and projects relating to the planning and administration of the Arizona Highway Safety Program. Agency GOHS Amount $320,000 43 Planning and Administration | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM GOAL: TO PROVIDE TRAINING AND RESOURCES FOR VEHICULAR CRIMES UNITS TO MORE EFFECTIVELY AIDE IN THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF FATAL TRAFFIC COLLISIONS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Accident investigation (“AI”) is a program administered by agencies funded by GOHS in order to verify the parameters of a crash, the demarcations of the crash, the exact location of the crash – both in a state highway or a city/county street, to produce an investigative report that will show where the vehicles were positioned before and after the crash by considering skid marks, debris and position of the vehicles at the point of impact (“PI”) and at the point of rest (“PR”) in order to determine the causation and consequences of the crash. AI reports include statements from witnesses, victims and other drivers in order to determine where the fault lies with the crash and whether citations should be issued. AI is primarily done by electronic equipment, like Accident Investigation Measurement System (“AIMS”), GPS Tracking and one man stations that provide the investigator with exact technical data that will produce a reproduction of the crash. Most cities have intersections on GPS so they can draw the accident report into a diagram by superimposing PI’s and PR’s into the exact location of the incident. The Vehicular Crimes Units (“VCU”) for agencies provide this service. AZ DPS provides these services for smaller jurisdictions that are unable to afford sophisticated equipment. Equipment and overtime provided to these investigators is critical to reporting the crash where there are injuries or fatalities involved that will end up being discussed in court – both criminal and civil. PERFORMANCE PLAN EQUIPMENT GOHS provides funding for crash mapping software, AIMS and Nikkon Total Station Kits, to help agencies in their duties investigating traffic accidents. Agencies funded by GOHS often provide accident investigation and reconstruction services to neighboring agencies without necessary equipment to perform this function on their own. TRAINING Funding is provided for agencies to receive IPTM training in accident investigation and reconstruction. TASKS TASK 1 – ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION OVERTIME Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies for overtime in response to collisions involving the potential for criminal charges. 44 Accident Investigation | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Agency Maricopa CSO Total Amount $ 15,000 $ 15,000 TASK 2 – ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to purchase equipment to aid in their VCU in the investigation and reconstruction of traffic accidents. Funding will be provided for crash mapping and CDR software, AIMS units, Nikkon total station units, and one GPS unit. Agency Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Tucson Police Department Peoria Police Department Maricopa Police Department Buckeye Police Department Total Amount $ 2,642 $ 45,000 $ 25,000 $ 14,000 $ 4,800 $ 91,442 TASK 3 – ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION TRAINING Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to receive training through the Institute of Police Technology and Management in accident investigation and reconstruction. Agency Tempe Police Department GOHS - IPTM Training Total Amount $ 5,000 $ 42,000 $ 47,000 TASK 4 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage section 402 Accident Investigation programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $23,961 45 Accident Investigation | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING FATALITIES, INJURIES AND CRASHES THROUGH ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Alcohol and drug-related fatalities continue to be a leading cause of death on Arizona roads and highways. In 2009, Arizona saw a 16.41 percent decrease in alcohol-related fatalities from 2008, with 219 individuals killed as a result of alcohol-related accidents. To combat the prevalence of impaired driving, GOHS devotes a significant amount of resources to overtime enforcement, equipment and training for law enforcement officers statewide. Arizona law enforcement officers and prosecutors are aided by some of the toughest DUI laws in the country. Arizona’s Impaired Driving Program utilizes enforcement, education and public awareness to reduce the number of fatalities and injuries resulting from alcohol-impaired collisions. GOHS will continue to fund these programs which have proven to be successful in reducing the number of alcohol-related fatalities, increasing the number of DUI arrests and continuing to keep Arizona’s highways and roadways safe. Arizona’s DUI enforcement program includes two parallel enforcement activities: (1) year-long sustained enforcement efforts and (2) periodic enhanced enforcement campaigns (such as Holiday DUI Task Force enforcement efforts). The goal of Arizona’s DUI Enforcement efforts is to identify areas that have a high frequency of fatal and/or serious injury collisions and devote resources to these locations in an effort to reduce alcoholrelated fatalities. Public awareness activities, consisting of earned and paid media efforts will focus on increasing the public’s awareness of ongoing statewide DUI enforcement activities. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier conducts press conferences and frequent media interviews, in English and Spanish, throughout the year and during all Holiday enforcement campaigns. Earned media is supplemented by targeted paid media efforts emphasizing Arizona’s “Get a DD…Not a DUI!” and “Drive Hammered…Get Nailed!” slogan, including radio and print ads and sponsorship of the Arizona Cardinals. In addition to high visibility enforcement and media campaigns, GOHS places a large emphasis on training law enforcement officers in Standardized Field Sobriety Test (“SFST”) and Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (“HGN”) training, Law Enforcement Phlebotomy Training, Drug Recognition Expert (“DRE”) courses, Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (“ARIDE”) and Drug Impaired Training for Educational Professionals (“DITEP”) 46 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan courses. GOHS also conducts training for prosecutors and judges on DUI law issues through the Arizona Prosecuting Attorney’s Advisory Council (“APAAC”) and the Arizona Supreme Court. GOHS devotes resources to enforce underage drinking laws through partnerships with MADD and SADD. Additional funding is devoted to agencies to conduce underage drinking enforcement efforts, examples include Phoenix Police Department’s “Party Crew” enforcement, and programs in Yavapai County. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Priority funding is given to agencies that have proven to be the most successful with funding received from past GOHS grant awards. Participating agencies received funding based on number of DUI arrests, fatalities and injuries over the previous three years. In FFY 2012, GOHS is providing Section 402 Alcohol funding to 44 agencies and Section 410 Alcohol funding to 21 agencies conduct high visibility enforcement campaigns. Arizona’s successful DUI enforcement efforts are attributable to law enforcement officers being highly trained to develop the necessary skills, knowledge and abilities to detect drivers impaired by alcohol, arrest and aide in the successful prosecution of these offenders. Figure 2 New DUI Processing Vehicles – Purchased in FY 2011 with Sections 163 and 410 High Visibility Enforcement Funds 47 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan EDUCATION GOHS devotes a significant amount of resources toward the training of officers in areas such as SFST, DRE, HGN, DUI report writing and testimony, law enforcement phlebotomy, ARIDE and DITEP. It is a direct result of these training opportunities that Arizona continues to be the national leader in the number of officers that are certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) and DRE Instructors. Arizona’s robust DRE training program has proven to be a successful model for other states to adopt, consequently, Arizona provides training to law enforcement officials from other states and countries. Through the first six months of calendar year 2011, with funding from GOHS, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office hosted 53 certification nights, with 793 urine samples collected from subjects. Due to the prevalence of alcohol and drug impaired drivers, GOHS places a large emphasis on the education and certification of DREs. Arizona’s law enforcement phlebotomy program provides training and certification to law enforcement officers by providing them the necessary tools to obtain blood for evidentiary purposes which aide in successful DUI prosecutions. The DITEP program, taught by DRE instructors, provides school administrators and school nurses the training to recognize and evaluate individuals in an academic setting who may be impaired by drugs. In the last fiscal year, GOHS provided more than $200,000 in support of law enforcement training programs. Travel reimbursement, training, books, materials and supplies, conference speakers in support of special training knowledge, and conference registration to provide necessary updates to the knowledge of our states’ DRE’s as well as training for Law Enforcement Phlebotomists are all covered by GOHS. The funds invested in training law enforcement officers continue to demonstrate positive results. Arizona continues to be a national leader in DREs with 471 in 2010 (trailing only California), Arizona ranks 7th in the country with 8.2 evaluations per DRE. PUBLIC AWARENESS This past year under the direction of GOHS Director Alberto Gutier, GOHS expended $200,000 in paid media campaigns promoting the joint messages of “Get a DD…Not a DUI!” and “Drive Hammered…Get Nailed!” theme. GOHS introduced the new message of “Get a DD…Not a DUI!” in an attempt to reach out and encourage sober designated drivers. Section 410 funds supported billboard promotions, radio, television and print media. Last year, GOHS partnered with the Arizona Cardinals football club to promote sober designated drivers at Cardinals home football games and on the Cardinals radio broadcast. This year the Cardinals improved to be the fifth best team in the league for signing up designated drivers at home football games. GOHS is proud of the partnership established with the Cardinals and other statewide media to promote designated driving. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier conducts an annual press conference to kick off the Holiday DUI enforcement campaign at the State Capitol. This event is widely covered by local TV, radio and print media. Additionally, with GOHS’ online DUI reporting system, press releases during planned enforcement events are distributed to the media on a daily basis with updated impaired driving statistics from the previous evening’s activity, plus cumulative data. These releases provide constant news reports on DUI arrests and the importance—and pleas—to the public to 48 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan reduce these numbers. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier is constantly doing radio, TV and newspaper interviews to expand on the reports. GOHS funding dictates that each agency receiving DUI enforcement funds conduct educational and public awareness campaigns in their respective communities. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – DUI ENFORCEMENT AND OVERTIME Project Summary: Federal 402 funds will support comprehensive impaired driving enforcement efforts throughout Arizona. Funding will support overtime and related employee related expenses to conduct high visibility enforcement efforts, DUI saturation patrols and checkpoints. Agency Oro Valley Police Department Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control Town of Marana La Paz County Sheriff's Office Prescott Police Department Sierra Vista Police Department Goodyear Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Arizona State Capitol Police Department Casa Grande Police Department City of Flagstaff Nogales Police Department Yuma County Sheriff's Office Avondale Police Department Maricopa Police Department Navajo County Sheriff's Office Pima Community College Public Safety Cottonwood Police Department Douglas Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Cochise County Sheriff's Office Mohave County Sheriff's Office Safford Police Department Springerville Police Department University of Arizona Police Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 35,000 30,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 24,000 23,000 22,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 49 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Yuma Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Clifton Police Department Show Low Police Department Town of Payson Apache County Sheriff Arizona State University El Mirage Police Department Graham County Sheriff's Office NAU Police Department St. Johns Police Department Wickenburg Police Department Eagar Police Department Sahuarita Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department Quartzsite Police Department Coolidge Police Department Williams PD Benson Police Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 9,000 7,500 7,000 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 552,750 TASK 2 – DUI EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund equipment, such as Portable Breath Testing Devices (“PBT”), Phlebotomy supplies, Phamatec drug testing kits, urine and blood kits, and gas cylinders used to calibrate PBTs and Intoxilyzers. PBTs are handheld instruments used in the field by law enforcement officers to indicate the presence of alcohol on suspected alcohol/drug impaired drivers and underage alcohol offenders. Agency Oro Valley Police Department Nogales Police Department Arizona Game and Fish Department Holbrook Police Department Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Prescott Valley Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Arizona State University Cottonwood Police Department Douglas Police Department Williams PD $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 5,000 5,000 4,000 3,825 2,200 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 50 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Sierra Vista Police Department Arizona SADD Yuma Police Department Clifton Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,500 1,050 1,000 1,000 500 37,575 TASK 3 – IMPAIRED DRIVING TRAINING Project Summary: Most training for Arizona law enforcement officers is provided for out of Section 410 funds – training for SFST, DRE, Phlebotomy, HGN, ARIDE and DITEP. Funding from this task will provide the Chandler Police Department with alcohol training and provides training for the annual GOHS training conference judges. This task will also provide funding for the 2012 Lifesavers conference. Agency Chandler Police Department GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - Judges Conference Total $ $ $ $ Amount 6,094 10,000 30,000 46,094 TASK 4 – DUI MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES Project Summary: To provide funding for supplies such as PBT and Intoxilyzer mouthpieces, printing of training material, and other collateral material (such as pencils and badges for community events). Agency Arizona SADD Pima County Department of Transportation MADD Arizona State Capitol Police Department Coolidge Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department MADD Chino Valley Police Department Clifton Police Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 9,150 7,000 1,000 848 600 500 500 500 86 80 20,264 TASK 5 – DUI EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS Project Summary: This task provides funding for continued public education and awareness campaigns focused on youth alcohol programs. The court monitoring program by MADD in 51 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Maricopa and Pima Counties will assist GOHS and the TSRP in identifying efficient prosecution and adjudication of DUI and impaired driving cases. SADD will utilize these funds to educate youth statewide about the dangers associated with underage alcohol consumption and impaired driving. Funding will also be provided for the MADD and SADD national conferences. Agency Mesa Police Department Arizona SADD MADD Total Amount $ 4,250 $ 49,800 $ 58,500 $ 112,550 TASK 6 – VEHICULAR CRIMES BUREAU EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task provides funding to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Vehicular Crimes Bureau for the purchase of laptops, tablets, scanners and related software for the prosecution of DUI cases and other vehicular crimes cases where fatalities occur. Agency Maricopa County Attorney’s Office Total $ $ Amount 25,000 25,000 TASK 7 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Alcohol programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $ 155,281 TASK 8 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ALCOHOL SURVEY Project Summary: GOHS will conduct an annual survey on alcohol, occupant protection and speeding behavior and perceptions about enforcement and media. Agency GOHS Amount $ 7,000 52 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 9 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION MATERIALS AND OUTREACH Project Summary: This task will support the development, printing and distribution of public information and education materials to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s DUI laws. Funding will additionally support GOHS’ “Public Safety Days” at the Arizona State Fair to provide the public information and education about Arizona DUI laws and general traffic safety issues. Additionally, this task will support one dedicated storage unit for DUI PI&E materials. Agency GOHS – PI&E GOHS – Public Safety Days GOHS – Storage Unit Total Amount $ 15,000 $ 13,000 $ 1,200 $ 29,200 SECTION 410 TASK 1 – DUI ENFORCEMENT AND OVERTIME Project Summary: Federal 410 funds will support comprehensive impaired driving enforcement efforts throughout Arizona. Funding will support overtime and related employee related expenses to conduct high visibility enforcement efforts, DUI saturation patrols and checkpoints. Agency Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Phoenix Police Department Mesa Police Department Tucson Police Department Tempe Police Department Arizona Department of Public Safety Gilbert Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Pima County Sheriff's Office Arizona Department of Public Safety Chandler Police Department Peoria Police Department Phoenix Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Glendale Police Department Surprise Police Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 130,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 40,000 80,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,000 28,000 30,000 30,000 53 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Kingman Police Department Buckeye Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Total $ $ $ $ 30,000 25,000 25,000 1,253,000 TASK 2 – DUI EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund equipment, such as Portable Breath Testing Devices (“PBT”), Phlebotomy supplies, Phamatec drug testing kits, urine and blood kits, and gas cylinders used to calibrate PBTs and Intoxilyzers. PBTs are handheld instruments used in the field by law enforcement officers to indicate the presence of alcohol on suspected alcohol/drug impaired drivers and underage alcohol offenders. Agency Tempe Police Department Phoenix Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Buckeye Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Total $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 50,000 14,500 5,000 2,500 1,000 73,000 TASK 3 – DUI MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES Project Summary: This task will provide funding for supplies such as PBT and Intoxilyzer mouthpieces, printing of training material, and other collateral material (such as pencils and badges for community events). Agency Yavapai County Sheriff Amount $ 4,000 TASK 4 – TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE PROSECUTOR Project Summary: Arizona’s Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor assists prosecutors statewide in the adjudication of impaired driving cases. The TSRP will continue to focus on two goals: (1) increase the visibility of traffic safety cases with prosecutors and prosecutors’ visibility with the traffic safety community, and (2) increase the confidence of prosecutors to go into the courtroom. Funding will be provided for personnel services, employee related expenses, materials and supplies and travel. Agency City of Phoenix Prosecutor’s Office Amount $ 210,983 TASK 5 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 410 Alcohol programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the 54 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. This task will also support funding for Arizona’s Impaired Driving Coordinator. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $140,000 TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: GOHS will develop and implement paid media campaigns to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s DUI laws. This will include the creation of brochures, collateral material, print, electronic, radio and broadcast media. Agency GOHS - Media Amount $200,000 TASK 7 – IMPAIRED DRIVING TRAINING Project Summary: This task provides funding for training Arizona law enforcement officers in SFST, DRE, HGN, DUI report writing and testimony, law enforcement phlebotomy, ARIDE and DITEP. Funding supports expenses related to classes, including DRE and phlebotomy kits, textbooks and manuals, and travel. Agency GOHS - DRE Conference GOHS - DRE Support GOHS - SFST Support GOHS - Phlebotomy Support Total Amount $ 25,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 175,000 TASK 8 – SCHOOL EDUCATION Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS to work with high schools across the state to conduct programs to educate youth about the risks associated with underage alcohol consumption. Agency GOHS Amount $15,000 55 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan SECTION 410 – HIGH FATALITY TASK 1 – DUI EQUIPMENT Project Summary: Carry forward Federal 410 High Fatality funds will support the purchase of Livescan Instruments for DUI processing vehicles for the Phoenix Police Department, Scottsdale Police Department, Pinal County Sheriff’s Office, Mesa Police Department and Chandler Police Department. Livescan Instruments take fingerprints in electronic fashion and provides an immediate comparison to data to check DUI suspects for prior arrests and assists officers to positively identify suspects. Agency Phoenix Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Mesa Police Department Chandler Police Department Total Amount $ 105,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 185,000 Figure 3 GOHS Director Alberto Gutier, DPS Director Robert Halliday, Phoenix Prosecutor Aarón Carreón-Ainsa, Phoenix Police Commander Joe Klima, Phoenix Police Lieutenant Brian Lee at the dedication of the Lee Campbell Memorial DUI Van 56 / | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PROGRAM GOAL: TO SUPPORT RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND FIRE DISTRICTS WITH THE NECESSARY RESOURCES TO RESPOND TO TRAFFIC COLLISIONS IN RURAL ARIZONA. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS provides limited funding to predominantly rural fire departments and fire districts to purchase equipment to assist emergency responders at the scene of traffic accidents. According to 2009 FARS data, 51.8 percent of traffic fatalities in Arizona were rural (418), even though most of Arizona’s population resides in two counties – Maricopa and Pima. PERFORMANCE PLAN EQUIPMENT GOHS provides extraction equipment to fire departments and fire districts throughout Arizona. Need is determined on number of fatal accidents and response time for the agency and if the agency received grant funding from GOHS within the last 3 fiscal years. TRAINING GOHS provides funding to the agencies to for training in order to properly work the equipment provided. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – FIRST RESPONDER EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund the purchase of extrication equipment, including Hurst LKE 55 Combination tools (Jaws of Life), rescue struts, cribbing and air bags. Agency Benson Fire District Black Canyon Fire District Cottonwood Fire Department Fountain Hills Fire Department Fry Fire District Total $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 11,550 13,403 11,981 20,617 6,540 64,091 57 Emergency Medical Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 2 – TRAINING Project Summary: This task will provide funding for the Fry Fire District to receive extrication training. Agency Fry Fire District Amount $ 1,050 TASK 3 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 Emergency Medical Services program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $ 14,014 58 Emergency Medical Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan MOTORCYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF MOTORCYCLE FATALITIES. PROGRAM OVERVIEW According to 2009 FARS data, motorcycle fatalities decreased 14.18 percent from 2008 (141 fatalities in 2008 to 121 fatalities in 2009). funds public awareness campaigns focusing on motorcycle safety and reminding the driving public to look out for motorcycles. Additionally, utilizing state motorcycle safety funds and with the Arizona Motorcycle Safety Advisory Council, GOHS funds statewide paid media campaigns promoting motorcycle safety. PERFORMANCE PLAN GOHS’ goal in creating public awareness campaigns for motorcycle safety is three-fold: 1. Inform the general public to watch out for motorcycles 2. Inform the motorcyclist to ride safely in accordance with state law 3. Educate the motorcycle community on the danger of riding under the influence TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 - GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ANNUAL SURVEY – MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS’ annual survey measuring the use of motorcycle helmets. This survey is conducted as part of GOHS’ annual seatbelt survey. Agency GOHS – Annual Seatbelt Survey $ Amount 10,000 SECTION 2010 TASK 1 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: GOHS will develop and implement paid media campaigns to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s motorcycle laws, including distracted riding. This will include the creation of brochures, collateral material, print, electronic, radio and broadcast media. Agency GOHS Amount $200,000 59 Motorcycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan OCCUPANT PROTECTION PROGRAM GOAL: TO IMPROVE THE USAGE OF SEATBELTS AND CHILD SAFETY SEATS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF FATALITIES AND INJURIES AS A RESULT OF VEHICULAR COLLISIONS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS accomplishes its goal of improving seatbelt and child safety seat usage through strong cohesive statewide enforcement campaigns with a united effort of “Buckle Up Arizona…It’s the Law!” Although currently a secondary seatbelt violation state, Arizona law enforcement agencies implement a zero-tolerance policy when encountering a non-usage of seatbelts in correlation with a stop for a traffic violation. Occupant protection enforcement has a consistent built-in component in all aspects of funded traffic projects. Enforcement is supported by extensive education and public awareness activities. GOHS partners with public and private sectors to promote activities to enhance occupant protection. These include, but are not limited to, seatbelt and child safety seat classes, inspections and associated events. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Arizona actively participates in the Buckle Up Arizona…It’s the Law/Click it or Ticket (“CIOT”) and “Child Passenger Safety” campaigns and related events. Funding is provided to top performing agencies for enforcement during these periods. GOHS strongly supports and funds projects directed toward enforcing Arizona’s occupant protection laws. EDUCATION GOHS continues to facilitate and develop the Children are Priceless Passengers (“CAPP”) program throughout the state. The program, although open to the general public, is directed towards violators of the child passenger safety laws. The CAPP program provides an opportunity for education on the proper installation and use of child safety seats. CAPP is currently at 15 locations and will be expanding to additional locations in FY 2012. GOHS additionally funds and sponsors three child safety seat certification classes in three geographic areas across the state in proximity to individuals wanting to become certified technicians. 60 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 - OCCUPANT PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT AND EDUCATION Project Summary: This task will support funding personnel services (overtime) and associated employee related expenses for law enforcement agencies to conduct enforcement of Arizona seatbelt and child safety seat laws. Funding will additionally be provided to fire departments to conduct child safety seat clinics within their jurisdiction. Agency Phoenix Fire Department Glendale Fire Department Pima County Sheriff's Office Tucson Police Department Chandler Fire Department Tempe Police Department Glendale Police Department Yuma Police Department Mesa PD Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 60,000 20,959 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 4,250 170,209 TASK 2 – EQUIPMENT AND CHILD SAFETY SEATS Project Summary: In addition to providing child safety seats through the CAPP program, GOHS provides funding to agencies to distribute child safety seats throughout their individual communities. The distribution of these seats is in combination with education to parents and guardians on proper installation of child safety seats. Agency Tucson Medical Center Health Care Apache County Public Health Services District Maricopa Integrated Health System Yuma Police Department Pima County Health Department Show Low Police Department Chandler Fire Department La Paz County Public Health Education & Prevention Program $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 20,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,750 4,600 Coconino County Public Health Services District Drexel Heights Fire District Nogales Police Department Total $ $ $ $ 4,400 3,000 1,250 73,000 61 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 3 – OCCUPANT PROTECTION TRAVEL Project Summary: This task provides funding for in-state travel for child safety seat training. This task also provides funding for occupant protection/child safety seat education overtime and employee related expenses. Agency Coconino County Public Health Services District Apache County Public Health Services District Total Amount $ 1,000 $ 534 $ 1,534 TASK 4 – OCCUPANT PROTECTION MATERIALS & SUPPLIES Project Summary: This task provides funding to agencies to develop, print and distribute occupant protection public information materials and supplies. Agency Tempe Police Department Coconino County Public Health Services District Phoenix Police Department Apache County Public Health Services District Prescott Valley Police Department La Paz County Public Health Education & Prevention Program Chandler Fire Department Pima County Health Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 3,000 2,500 1,700 1,500 1,500 1,400 250 200 12,050 TASK 5 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY CHILDREN ARE PRICELESS PASSENGERS PROGRAM Project Summary: The goal of GOHS’ innovative Children Are Priceless Passengers (“CAPP”) program is to improve the child seat usage rate in Arizona by increasing enforcement of child restraint laws by law enforcement agencies, increasing education of drivers about the importance of child safety seats and raising public awareness about the effectiveness of child safety seats. This task provides funding for the purchase of child safety seats and booster seats for distribution throughout the state. Additional funding is provided to certified instructors to provide educational and public safety awareness classes for the CAPP diversion program. Agency GOHS – CAPP Support Pima County Sheriff Total Amount $ 50,000 $ 15,000 $ 65,000 62 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Occupant Protection programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $ 53,900 TASK 7 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION, OUTREACH Project Summary: This task will provide funding for GOHS to design, print and distribute public information and education materials relating to occupant protection programs. Funding will additionally support GOHS’ “Public Safety Days” at the Arizona State Fair to provide the public information and education about Arizona occupant protection laws and general traffic safety issues. Additionally, this task will support one dedicated storage unit for child safety seats and occupant protection materials. Agency GOHS - PI&E GOHS - Public Safety Days GOHS - Storage Unit Total $ $ $ $ Amount 12,500 13,000 1,200 26,700 TASK 8 – TRAVEL AND TRAINING Project Summary: GOHS will hold its annual conference for judges with a curriculum focused on occupant protection and the CAPP program. This task will also provide funding for the 2012 Lifesavers conference. Agency GOHS Conference Lifesavers Total Amount $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 63 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 9 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY BUCKLE UP ARIZONA…IT’S THE LAW!/CLICK IT OR TICKET ENFORCEMENT AND MEDIA Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the top performing law enforcement agencies for enforcement during the Buckle Up Arizona…It’s the Law!/Click it or Ticket campaign – based on the 2011 CIOT campaign. GOHS will determine these agencies in early January 2012. This task will also provide funding for paid media for the FFY 2012 Buckle Up Arizona…It’s the Law!/Click it or Ticket campaign. Agency GOHS – CIOT Enforcement GOHS – CIOT Media Total Amount $ 150,000 $ 40,000 $ 190,000 TASK 10 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ANNUAL SEATBELT SURVEY Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS’ annual seatbelt survey. Agency GOHS – Annual Seatbelt Survey Amount $ 50,000 TASK 11 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: This task will provide funding for the development and distribution of paid media campaigns (electronic, print, radio and broadcast) to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s occupant protection, seatbelt and child safety seat laws. Agency GOHS – Media Amount $ 30,000 64 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FATALITIES AND INJURIES THROUGH ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW This year, GOHS will continue to place an emphasis on school zone and pedestrian safety. GOHS is funding a number of agencies to conduct specific enforcement details in school zones and pedestrian crossings. This enforcement is combined with greater earned media from GOHS and the respective law enforcement agencies concerning the importance of obeying traffic laws in school zones and in pedestrian walkways. GOHS continues to provide funding for selected agencies to purchase bicycle helmets for distribution within their respective communities. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT GOHS provides overtime funding for selected agencies with identified problems with speeding through school zones and accidents involving motor vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. With this funding, these agencies participate in “Wolf Pack” enforcement details within their communities to aggressively enforce school zone and pedestrian traffic laws. PUBLIC AWARENESS GOHS provides funding for agencies to purchase bicycle helmets for children to be utilized at public safety fairs and community events. Along with the distribution of helmets, agencies provide the public with important safety information concerning bicycle operation. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CROSSING ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to conduct “Wolf Pack” or other selective traffic enforcement of pedestrian crosswalk and bicycle right of way laws. Agency Tucson Police Department Peoria Police Department University of Arizona Police Department Mesa PD Total $ $ $ $ $ Amount 15,555 10,000 10,000 4,250 39,805 65 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 2 – SCHOOL ZONE ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME Project Summary: This task provides funding for the Peoria Police Department to conduct school zone and school bus safety enforcement. Agency Peoria PD Total Amount $ 11,000 $ 11,000 TASK 3 – BICYCLE HELMETS, PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION MATERIALS Project Summary: This task will support the purchase of bicycle helmets and other materials (including the development of print and electronic media) for bicycle and pedestrian safety for events throughout the state. Agency Peoria Police Department Phoenix Street Transportation Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Total $ $ $ $ Amount 9,000 7,000 4,000 20,000 TASK 4 – PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will support the purchase of bicycles for the Arizona State University Police Department to enforce pedestrian and bicycle laws on the campus and for the Phoenix Street Transportation Department for the dissemination of information on pedestrian safety in the City of Phoenix. Agency Arizona State University Police Department Phoenix Street Transportation Total Amount $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $ 12,000 TASK 5 – PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY PROFESSIONAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the Phoenix Street Transportation Department for the development, design and distribution of print and electronic campaigns on pedestrian safety throughout the City of Phoenix. Agency Phoenix Street Transportation Total $ $ Amount 14,000 14,000 66 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TASK 6 – PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY TRAVEL Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the Phoenix Street Transportation Department for instate travel to attend training on pedestrian safety issues. Agency Phoenix Street Transportation Total $ $ Amount 4,000 4,000 TASK 7 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety for the development of public information and education materials relating to pedestrian and bicycle safety. Agency GOHS – PI&E Total $ $ Amount 12,500 12,500 TASK 8 - GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $ 21,658 67 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan POLICE TRAFFIC SERVICES PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF TRAFFIC FATALITIES ON ARIZONA ROADWAYS AND HIGHWAYS RESULTING FROM SPEEDING, AGGRESSIVE DRIVING, RED LIGHT RUNNING AND OTHER FORMS OF RISKY DRIVING BEHAVIOR. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Speeding is the number one contributor in fatal traffic accidents in Arizona. According to FARS, in 2009 there were 283 speed related fatalities (a 27.25% decrease from 2008), constituting 35.07% of all traffic fatalities. Impaired driving and speeding continue to be the leading causes of traffic fatalities in Arizona. Speed related fatalities have decreased since peaking at 584 in 2006 as a result of fewer vehicle miles traveled and stronger enforcement of Arizona traffic laws. Law enforcement officers are aided with strong statutes governing speeding and aggressive driving. Arizona has a “Double Fine” program to reduce persistent speeding and aggressive driving violations by having the ability to suspend an individual’s drivers license when 8 or more points are accumulated within a 12 month period. The “Double Fine” program is extended to speeding in excess of the posted speed limit in construction zones when workers are present. Arizona aggressively prosecutes and adjudicates red light violators. GOHS has successfully funded programs with the City of Phoenix Police Department in an effort to crack down on red light drivers within Arizona’s largest city. Figure 4 Police Package Motorcycle Purchased with FY 2011 funding from GOHS by the Mesa Police Department. In addition to providing overtime for Selective Traffic Enforcement (“STEP”), GOHS funds laser and radar guns, speed trailers and aggressive driving vehicles for a number of law enforcement agencies. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Funding is given to agencies with a proven track record of aggressively enforcing Arizona traffic laws. Particular attention is given to agencies with a high number of fatalities resulting from speeding or aggressive driving. GOHS looks to fund agencies implementing unique speed management and aggressive driving enforcement programs. 68 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOHS will continue to fund equipment – such as radar and laser guns – to law enforcement officers to more effectively enforce traffic laws. GOHS will increase the amount of sustained enforcement of speed and aggressive driver laws through overtime funding. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS Project Summary: Selective Traffic Enforcement Programs (“STEP”) are sustained traffic enforcement campaigns conducted by law enforcement agencies throughout the year. Participating law enforcement agencies will enforce speed, aggressive driving, red light running and DUI laws. This task will fund related overtime and employee related expenses. Agency Gilbert Police Department Mesa PD Chandler Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Phoenix Police Department Phoenix Police Department Tucson Police Department Tempe Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Navajo County Sheriff's Office Nogales Police Department Peoria Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Prescott Police Department Springerville Police Department Town of Marana Sedona Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Sahuarita Police Department Arizona State Capitol Police Department Arizona State University Police Department Buckeye Police Department Cochise County Sheriff's Office El Mirage Police Department Quartzsite Police Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 50,000 44,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 25,000 22,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 69 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Safford Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department St. Johns Police Department Mesa PD Cottonwood Police Department Apache County Sheriff Eagar Police Department Maricopa Police Department Williams PD Benson Police Department Coolidge Police Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,250 4,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,500 540,500 TASK 2 – EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund equipment, such as police package motorcycles, speed trailers, LASER and Radar guns and tint meters to aide in the enforcement of Arizona traffic laws. Agency Town of Marana Mesa PD Gila River Indian Community Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Phoenix Police Department Nogales Police Department Prescott Police Department Sedona Police Department Tucson Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Show Low Police Department Peoria Police Department Avondale Police Department Coconino County Sheriff's Office Glendale Police Department Glendale Police Department Town of Fredonia Eagar Police Department Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Apache County Sheriff La Paz County Sheriff's Office Sierra Vista Police Department Benson Police Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 54,000 43,000 34,700 33,000 30,000 27,000 20,983 20,500 13,000 12,000 10,550 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 9,000 8,000 6,200 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,500 70 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Bullhead City Police Department Tempe Police Department Holbrook Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Snowflake-Taylor Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,500 5,400 5,400 4,129 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,990 2,700 429,552 TASK 3 – MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES Project Summary: This task will support funding for materials and supplies for use in public education and awareness campaigns on speeding and aggressive driving. Agency Prescott Valley Police Department Amount 1,500 $ TASK 4 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY TRAVEL Project Summary: This task will support funding for the 2012 Lifesavers Conference. Agency GOHS - Lifesavers Amount $ 10,000 TASK 5 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY SPEED SURVEY Project Summary: This task will provide funding for the annual attitudinal survey on speeding. Agency GOHS - Survey Amount $ 7,000 TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 Police Traffic Services program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $ 205,604 71 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DEVELOP EFFECTIVE SAFETY MESSAGES AND OUTREACH STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE SAFETY FOR ALL USERS OF ARIZONA ROADWAYS AND HIGHWAYS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS funds roadway safety programs to create public awareness campaigns to promote safety with all users of Arizona roadways and highways. PERFORMANCE PLAN Public awareness campaigns will be created with the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation. The focus of the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation will be to continue the successful Share the Road campaign, educating the general public and truckers about truck safety. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION Project Summary: This task will fund personnel services to the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation for the Share the Road campaign. Agency Arizona Transportation Education Foundation Amount $ 35,000 TASK 2 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 Roadway Safety program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $7,546 72 Roadway Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan TRAFFIC RECORDS PROGRAM GOAL: TO ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF STATISTICAL DATA RELATED TO TRAFFIC SAFETY. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division (“MVD”) collects, manages and analyzes Arizona traffic record data for GOHS. With funding from GOHS, MVD and the Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (“TRCC”) maintain the database for accident crash fatalities and injuries. In the last year, Arizona has made tremendous improvements with processing traffic data, including the redesign of the Crash Report Form and the implementation of AZ TraCS software for data collection. The goal of Arizona’s Traffic Records program is to ensure that GOHS, ADOT and law enforcement has access to accurate and complete data. This data is critical to identifying problem areas that need to be addressed with funding from GOHS. PERFORMANCE PLAN The TRCC, at the direction of MVD and GOHS continue to work on a number of projects to enhance the collection of traffic data in Arizona. In FFY 2012, MVD will focus on reducing the crash data backlog with overtime assistance from GOHS, supporting and developing AZ TraCS and establishing a database to track compliance with Arizona’s Ignition Interlock program. TASKS SECTION 408 TASK 1 – ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Project Summary: This task provides funding to the Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division to manage projects relating to the collection, evaluation and analysis of traffic data throughout the State of Arizona. Agency Arizona Department of Transportation – Motor Vehicle Division Amount $ 500,000 73 Traffic Records | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan SECTION 402 TASK 1 – E-CITATION AND DEVICES Project Summary: This task provides funding for the Casa Grande Police Department to purchase Mobile Data Computers for their e-citation system and for the Cottonwood Police Department to purchase handheld e-citation devices. Agency Casa Grande Police Department Cottonwood Police Department Total Amount $ 18,304 $ 4,581 $ 22,885 TASK 2 – E-CITATION PROFESSIONAL & OUTSIDE SERVICES Project Summary: This task provides funding for the Phoenix Police Department to implement e-citation software. Agency Phoenix Police Department Total Amount $ 19,000 $ 19,000 TASK 3 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 Traffic Records program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS – Program Administration Amount $8,036 74 Traffic Records | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan PROGRAM COST SUMMARY 23 CFR 1250 requires States to provide at least 40% of Federal funds toward local agencies and political subdivisions. For FY 2012, 59.56% or $3,940,986 is directed toward local agencies. 40.44% or $2,676,248 is directed toward GOHS or other state agencies. Agency Name GOHS - P&A Total Fund 402 Planning and Administration Program Area Task Local PA 1 $ $ - Agency Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Tucson Police Department Peoria Police Department Maricopa Police Department Buckeye Police Department Tempe Police Department GOHS Salaries & ERE GOHS Staff Other Operating Costs GOHS - IPTM Training Total Fund 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 State $ $ Accident Investigation Program Area Task Local AI 1 $ 15,000 AI 2 $ 2,642 AI 2 $ 45,000 AI 2 $ 25,000 AI 2 $ 14,000 AI 2 $ 4,800 AI 3 $ 5,000 AI 4 $ AI 4 $ AI 3 $ $ 111,442 Total 320,000 320,000 $ $ 320,000 320,000 State Total $ $ 15,000 $ $ 2,642 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 14,000 $ $ 4,800 $ $ 5,000 $ 22,005 $ 22,005 $ 1,956 $ 1,956 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 65,961 $ 177,403 75 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Agency Oro Valley Police Department Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control Town of Marana La Paz County Sheriff's Office Prescott Police Department Sierra Vista Police Department Goodyear Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Arizona State Capitol Police Department Casa Grande Police Department City of Flagstaff Nogales Police Department Yuma County Sheriff's Office Avondale Police Department Maricopa Police Department Navajo County Sheriff's Office Pima Community College Public Safety Cottonwood Police Department Douglas Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Cochise County Sheriff's Office Mohave County Sheriff's Office Safford Police Department Springerville Police Department University of Arizona Police Department Yuma Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Clifton Police Department Show Low Police Department Town of Payson Apache County Sheriff Arizona State University El Mirage Police Department Graham County Sheriff's Office NAU Police Department St. Johns Police Department Wickenburg Police Department Eagar Police Department Fund 402 402 Alcohol and Other Drugs Program Area Task Local AL 1 $ AL 1 $ 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 35,000 - State $ $ 30,000 25,000 25,000 24,000 23,000 22,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 7,500 7,000 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 30,000 Total $ $ 35,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 30,000 25,000 25,000 24,000 23,000 22,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 7,500 7,000 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 76 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Sahuarita Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department Quartzsite Police Department Coolidge Police Department Williams PD Benson Police Department Oro Valley Police Department Nogales Police Department Arizona Game and Fish Department Holbrook Police Department Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Prescott Valley Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Arizona State University Cottonwood Police Department Douglas Police Department Williams PD Sierra Vista Police Department Arizona SADD Yuma Police Department Clifton Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Chandler Police Department GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - Judges Conference Arizona SADD Pima County Department of Transportation MADD Arizona State Capitol Police Department Coolidge Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department MADD Chino Valley Police Department Clifton Police Department Mesa Police Department Arizona SADD MADD 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 5,000 5,000 3,825 2,200 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,000 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 5,000 5,000 4,000 3,825 2,200 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,050 1,000 1,000 500 6,094 9,150 7,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 10,000 30,000 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,050 1,000 1,000 500 6,094 10,000 30,000 9,150 7,000 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,000 600 500 500 500 86 80 4,250 45,500 1,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 848 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,000 848 600 500 500 500 86 80 4,250 49,800 58,500 77 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOHS - Program Administration GOHS - Alcohol Survey GOHS - PI&E Alcohol GOHS - Public Safety Days GOHS - Storage Unit Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Phoenix Police Department Mesa Police Department Tucson Police Department Tempe Police Department Arizona Department of Public Safety Gilbert Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Pima County Sheriff's Office Arizona Department of Public Safety Chandler Police Department Peoria Police Department Phoenix Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Glendale Police Department Surprise Police Department Kingman Police Department Buckeye Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Tempe Police Department Phoenix Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Buckeye Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Yavapai County Sheriff's Office City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office GOHS - Program Administration GOHS - Paid Media GOHS - DRE Conference GOHS - DRE Support GOHS - SFST Support GOHS - Phlebotomy Support GOHS - School Alcohol Education 402 402 402 402 402 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 6 7 8 8 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 130,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 40,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL AL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 7 7 8 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 28,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 14,500 5,000 2,500 1,000 4,000 210,983 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 155,281 7,000 15,000 13,000 1,200 80,000 60,000 140,000 200,000 25,000 75,000 25,000 50,000 15,000 78 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 155,281 7,000 15,000 13,000 1,200 130,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 40,000 80,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 28,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 14,500 5,000 2,500 1,000 4,000 210,983 140,000 200,000 25,000 75,000 25,000 50,000 15,000 Phoenix Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Mesa Police Department Chandler Police Department Total 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF Agency Arizona Department of Transportation Casa Grande Police Department Cottonwood Police Department City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office GOHS - Program Administration Total Agency Benson Fire District Black Canyon Fire District Cottonwood Fire Department Fountain Hills Fire Department Fry Fire District Fry Fire District GOHS - Program Administration Total Agency Name GOHS - Survey GOHS - Paid Media Total Agency Phoenix Fire Department Glendale Fire Department Pima County Sheriff's Office Tucson Police Department Chandler Fire Department Tempe Police Department Fund 402 2010 AL AL AL AL AL 1 1 1 1 1 Traffic Records Fund Program Area Task 408 TR 1 402 TR 1 402 TR 1 402 TR 2 402 TR 3 $ 105,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 2,176,568 Local $ $ $ $ $ $ Fund 402 402 402 402 402 402 Occupant Protection Program Area Task Local OP 1 $ OP 1 $ OP 1 $ OP 1 $ OP 1 $ OP 1 $ - $ $ 8,036 508,036 State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 14,014 14,014 State $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 210,000 State 60,000 20,959 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 978,329 State $ 500,000 18,304 4,581 19,000 41,885 Emergency Medical Services Fund Program Area Task Local 402 EM 1 $ 11,550 402 EM 1 $ 13,403 402 EM 1 $ 11,981 402 EM 1 $ 20,617 402 EM 1 $ 6,540 402 EM 2 $ 1,050 402 EM 3 $ $ 65,141 Motorcycle Safety Program Area Task Local MS 1 $ MS 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 105,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 3,031,697 Total $ 500,000 $ 18,304 $ 4,581 $ 19,000 $ 8,036 $ 549,921 Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,550 13,403 11,981 20,617 6,540 1,050 14,014 79,155 Total $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 210,000 Total $ $ $ $ $ $ 79 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 60,000 20,959 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 Glendale Police Department Yuma Police Department Mesa PD Tucson Medical Center Health Care Apache County Public Health Services District Maricopa Integrated Health System Yuma Police Department Pima County Health Department Show Low Police Department Chandler Fire Department La Paz County Public Health Education & Prevention Program Coconino County Public Health Services District Drexel Heights Fire District Nogales Police Department Coconino County Public Health Services District Apache County Public Health Services District Tempe Police Department Coconino County Public Health Services District Phoenix Police Department Apache County Public Health Services District Prescott Valley Police Department La Paz County Public Health Education & Prevention Program Chandler Fire Department Pima County Health Department Pima County Sheriff's Office GOHS - CAPP Support GOHS - Program Administration GOHS - PI&E GOHS - Public Safety Days 402 402 402 402 OP OP OP OP 1 1 1 2 402 OP 2 402 OP 2 402 402 OP OP 402 402 402 OP OP OP $ $ $ 10,000 5,000 4,250 $ $ $ 10,000 5,000 4,250 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2 2 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 2 2 2 $ $ 5,000 4,750 $ $ 5,000 4,750 $ 4,600 $ 4,600 $ 4,400 $ 4,400 $ $ 3,000 1,250 $ $ 3,000 1,250 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 534 $ 534 402 OP 2 402 402 402 OP OP OP 2 2 3 402 OP 3 402 402 OP OP 4 4 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 402 402 OP OP 4 4 $ 1,700 $ 1,700 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 402 OP 4 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 402 OP 4 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 402 402 OP OP 4 4 $ 250 $ 250 $ 200 $ 200 402 402 402 402 402 OP OP OP OP OP 5 5 6 7 7 $ 15,000 - $ $ $ $ $ 15,000 50,000 53,900 12,500 13,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 50,000 53,900 12,500 13,000 80 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan GOHS - Storage Unit GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - Judges Conference GOHS - CIOT Enforcement GOHS - CIOT Media GOHS - Seatbelt Survey GOHS - OP Media Total 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 Agency Tucson Police Department Peoria Police Department University of Arizona Police Department Mesa PD Peoria Police Department Phoenix Street Transportation Peoria Police Department Peoria Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Arizona State University Phoenix Street Transportation Phoenix Street Transportation Phoenix Street Transportation GOHS - PI&E GOHS - Program Administration Total Agency Gilbert Police Department Mesa PD Chandler Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Phoenix Police Department Phoenix Police Department Tucson Police Department Tempe Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Navajo County Sheriff's Office Nogales Police Department OP OP OP OP OP OP OP 7 8 8 9 9 10 11 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 132,000 403,793 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Fund Program Area Task Local 402 PS 1 $ 15,555 402 PS 1 $ 10,000 402 PS 1 $ 402 PS 1 $ 4,250 402 PS 2 $ 11,000 402 PS 3 $ 7,000 402 PS 3 $ 5,000 402 PS 3 $ 4,000 402 PS 3 $ 4,000 402 PS 4 $ 402 PS 4 $ 5,000 402 PS 5 $ 14,000 402 PS 6 $ 4,000 402 PS 7 $ 402 PS 8 $ $ 83,805 Police Traffic Services Fund Program Area Task 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 402 PT 1 Local $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 50,000 44,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 25,000 22,500 15,000 15,000 $ 1,200 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 18,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 288,600 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ 10,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,000 $ $ $ $ 12,500 $ 21,658 $ 51,158 State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,200 10,000 10,000 150,000 40,000 50,000 30,000 692,393 Amount $ 15,555 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 4,250 $ 11,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $ 14,000 $ 4,000 $ 12,500 $ 21,658 $ 134,963 - 81 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Amount $ 50,000 $ 44,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 25,000 $ 22,500 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Peoria Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Prescott Police Department Springerville Police Department Town of Marana Sedona Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Sahuarita Police Department Arizona State Capitol Police Department Arizona State University Police Department Buckeye Police Department Cochise County Sheriff's Office El Mirage Police Department Quartzsite Police Department Safford Police Department Snowflake-Taylor Police Department St. Johns Police Department Mesa PD Cottonwood Police Department Apache County Sheriff Eagar Police Department Maricopa Police Department Williams PD Benson Police Department Coolidge Police Department Town of Marana Mesa PD Gila River Indian Community Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Phoenix Police Department Nogales Police Department Prescott Police Department Sedona Police Department Tucson Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Show Low Police Department Peoria Police Department Avondale Police Department Coconino County Sheriff's Office 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 15,000 15,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,250 4,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,500 54,000 43,000 34,700 33,000 30,000 27,000 20,983 20,500 13,000 12,000 10,550 10,000 10,000 10,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000 5,000 - 82 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 15,000 15,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 9,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,250 4,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,500 54,000 43,000 34,700 33,000 30,000 27,000 20,983 20,500 13,000 12,000 10,550 10,000 10,000 10,000 Glendale Police Department Glendale Police Department Town of Fredonia Eagar Police Department Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Apache County Sheriff La Paz County Sheriff's Office Sierra Vista Police Department Benson Police Department Bullhead City Police Department Tempe Police Department Holbrook Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Yavapai County Sheriff's Office Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Mohave County Sheriff's Office Snowflake-Taylor Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - Speed Survey GOHS - Program Administration Total Agency Name Arizona Transportation Education Foundation GOHS - Program Administration Total 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 Roadway Safety Fund Program Area Task 402 RS 1 402 RS 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 9,000 9,000 8,000 6,200 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,500 5,500 5,400 5,400 4,129 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,990 2,700 1,500 961,552 Local $ 35,000 $ $ 35,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 7,000 205,604 232,604 State $ $ 7,546 $ 7,546 83 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 9,000 9,000 8,000 6,200 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,500 5,500 5,400 5,400 4,129 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,990 2,700 1,500 10,000 7,000 205,604 1,194,156 Total $ 35,000 $ 7,546 $ 42,546 84 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan 85 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan EQUIPMENT The following list identifies equipment in excess of $5,000.00 to be purchased utilizing Section 402 funds. Agency Tempe PD Phoenix Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Pinal County Sheriff's Office Mesa Police Department Chandler Police Department Tucson PD Peoria PD Maricopa PD Benson Fire District Black Canyon Fire District Cottonwood Fire Department Fountain Hills Fire Department Fry Fire District Prescott Valley Police Department Marana Police Department Mesa Police Department Gila River Indian Community Police Department Nogales Police Department Prescott Police Department Sedona Police Department Show Low Police Department Coconino County Sheriff's Office Casa Grande Police Department Total Program Area 410 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF 410-HF AI AI AI EM EM EM EM EM PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT TR Task 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Equipment Tahoe 7 Livescan Instruments Livescan Instrument Livescan Instrument Livescan Instrument Livescan Instrument GPS Unit Topcom Total Station Nikkon Total Station Aluminum Delux 4 Point Strut Kit Combi Tool Stabilization Kit, Lifting Airbags Extrication Equipment (Cutter, Spreader) Hydraulic Cutter Motorcycle 2 Police Package Motorcycles 2 Speed Message Boards 1 Motorcycle 1 Motorcycle 1 Motorcycle 1 Speed Message Board 2 Electronic Display Signs 1 Speed Message Board 3 Mobile Data Computers 86 Equipment | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2012 Highway Safety Plan Amount $ 50,000 $ 105,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 45,000 $ 25,000 $ 14,000 $ 7,830 $ 13,403 $ 11,981 $ 20,617 $ 5,000 $ 27,000 $ 54,000 $ 18,000 $ 28,700 $ 27,000 $ 20,983 $ 20,500 $ 10,550 $ 10,000 $ 18,304 $ 612,868 Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Alberto C. Gutier, Director Governor’s Highway Safety Representative 3030 North Central Avenue, Suite 1550 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 602-255-3216 www.azgohs.gov