STATE OF ARIZONA HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2011 PREPARED FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION PREPARED BY ARIZONA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY JANICE K. BREWER GOVERNOR STATE OF ARIZONA ALBERTO C. GUTIER DIRECTOR GOVERNOR’S HIGHWAY SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE MATTHEW D. DERR DEPUTY DIRECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Mission Statement .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 GOHS Organization Chart......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Problem Identification Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Highway Safety Plan Process – Grant Proposal Process....................................................................................................... 7 Program and Project Development ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Components of the Highway Safety Plan............................................................................................................................... 9 Funding..........................................................................................................................................................................................10 Goals and Performance Measures ............................................................................................................................................13 FFY 2011 Performance Measures .........................................................................................................................................17 Traffic Safety Performance (Core Outcome) Measures For Arizona ................................................................................19 State Certifications and Assurances...........................................................................................................................................33 Planning and Administration ......................................................................................................................................................43 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................43 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................43 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................44 Accident Investigation .................................................................................................................................................................45 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................45 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................45 Equipment...........................................................................................................................................................................45 Training ................................................................................................................................................................................46 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................46 Alcohol and Other Drugs.............................................................................................................................................................48 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................48 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................49 Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................................................49 Education.............................................................................................................................................................................49 Public Awareness................................................................................................................................................................50 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................50 Emergency Medical Services ......................................................................................................................................................58 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................58 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................58 Equipment...........................................................................................................................................................................58 Training ................................................................................................................................................................................58 3 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................58 Motorcycle Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................60 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................60 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................60 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................60 Occupant Protection....................................................................................................................................................................61 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................61 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................61 Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................................................61 Education.............................................................................................................................................................................61 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................62 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety .....................................................................................................................................................66 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................66 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................66 Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................................................66 Public Awareness................................................................................................................................................................66 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................66 Police Traffic Services...................................................................................................................................................................68 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................68 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................69 Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................................................69 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................69 Roadway Safety............................................................................................................................................................................73 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................73 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................73 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................73 Traffic Records ..............................................................................................................................................................................75 Program Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................75 Performance Plan....................................................................................................................................................................75 Tasks..........................................................................................................................................................................................75 Program Cost Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................77 Equipment ....................................................................................................................................................................................86 4 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan INTRODUCTION The Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (“GOHS”) produces this annual Highway Safety Plan (“HSP”) to serve as the guide for the implementation of highway safety projects throughout Arizona and as the application for funding through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”). Projects are funded to meet specific highway safety goals and performance measures as enumerated in this document, and are based on state and national traffic safety data, including data on crashes, fatalities, injuries and citations to ensure that projects are focused on areas of greatest need in the state. Highway Safety means the reduction of traffic crashes, deaths, injuries, and property damage on public roads. Arizona’s HSP is developed through annual problem identification and analysis of traffic records, citations, convictions, judicial outcome, incarcerations, assessments, screening, treatment, prevention, and surveys. Through the Director of the Governor's Office of Highway Safety, a channel of communication and understanding has been developed between the Governor's Office, the Legislature, state agencies, political subdivisions, and community groups concerning all aspects of the statewide highway safety program. Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-602 authorizes GOHS as the appropriate agency to administer highway safety programs in the State. Executive Order 2004-24 designates the GOHS as the State Highway Safety Agency (“SHSA”) and, as such, the appropriate agency to administer the HSP on behalf of the Governor. Problem identification involves the study of relationships between crashes and the characteristics of population, licensed drivers, registered vehicles, and vehicle miles traveled. Drivers can be classified into subgroups according to age, sex, etc. Vehicles can be divided into subgroups according to year, make, body style, etc. Roads can be divided into subgroups according to number of lanes, type of surface, political subdivision, etc. Crashes can be further analyzed in terms of the time, day of the week, month; age and sex of drivers; primary crash factors; and use of safety equipment. Other factors also influence motor vehicle crashes and should be considered in conducting comparative analyses between jurisdictions. For example, variations in composition of population, modes of transportation, the highway system, economic conditions, climate, and the effective strength of law enforcement agencies can be influential. The selection of crash comparisons requires the exercise of judgment. MISSION STATEMENT GOHS is the focal point for highway safety issues in Arizona. GOHS provides leadership by developing, promoting, and coordinating programs; influencing public and private policy; and increasing public awareness of highway safety. 5 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan GOHS ORGANIZATION CHART Janice K. Brewer Governor Cheryl O’Neill Admin. Secretary I Christopher Dickinson Technology Project Coordinator Alberto Gutier Mari Hembeck Executive Assistant Director Governor’s Highway Safety Representative PIO and Purchasing Officer John Butler Grants Manager Patricia Arteaga Project Coordinator Matthew Derr Deputy Director Lori Boncoskey Chief Financial Officer Benjamin Deemer Project Coordinator Dannie Maynard Fiscal Specialist Bridget Reutter Impaired Driving Coordinator VACANT Michelle Cota Project Coordinator VACANT Project Coordinator Amy Wozniak O.P. Coordinator Tempe P.D. Employee Beth Barnes PHX Prosecutor’s Office 6 Introduction | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION OVERVIEW HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN PROCESS – GRANT PROPOSAL PROCESS PROGRAM AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT In FFY 2011, GOHS instituted a number of operational changes to advance the grant cycle by five months. With these changes, and utilizing carry-forward funds, GOHS will be able to fund grants at the beginning of the FFY on October 1. 7 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan In November of each year, a letter outlining the Proposal Process and priority program areas is sent out to political subdivisions, state and non-profit agencies regarding the GOHS Proposal Process. All statewide law enforcement and non-profit agencies are encouraged to take an active part in Arizona's Highway Safety Program. In addition to the written notification, the letter and Proposal Guide are posted on the GOHS website. Proposals are due to the GOHS Phoenix Office no later than the end of February. Each proposal is date stamped, assigned a number and pertinent information is added to an Excel spreadsheet. Meetings with the GOHS Director, Deputy Director, Comptroller, Grant Coordinator, Project Coordinators, and Impaired Driving Coordinator to review each proposal begin in March and last through April. During these meetings each proposal is discussed and level of funding is determined. These discussions include the following evaluation criteria: • • • • Is the proposal fundable? Does the proposal address one or more of the priority areas identified in the Proposal Letter? Did the submitting agency follow the guidelines set forth in the Proposal Guide? Did they provide statistical data, cover letter signed by agency CEO, etc.? Has the agency been included in the HSP before? If yes, how did they perform? Were narrative and financial reports completed in accordance with contractual requirements? When evaluating grant applications, GOHS bases decisions on an agency’s past performance. If an agency exhibits poor performance – operationally or financially – it will be less likely to receive funding. Conversely, GOHS rewards top GOHS Grant Philosophy: performing agencies with funding. Grants for Performance GOHS requires grantees requesting $100,000 or greater or nonprofits applicants to make formal presentations before GOHS staff. These presentations present an overview of the request with background on the agency. This process allows the GOHS Director and staff to ask questions of the grantee and helps GOHS better assess the grant application. It is the policy of GOHS to fund all proposals that meet the listed criteria. This ensures that the entire state is represented in the HSP. Once the grants and funding levels are determined by program area, Project Coordinators begin work on writing contracts so they can be mailed to grantees by early September. During this time period, the Director, Deputy Director, Grant Manager and Comptroller begin development of the HSP. Agencies review their grant contracts in September and gain approval (if necessary) from their appropriate governing board and council. Once completed, the GOHS Director signs the contract and the agency can begin incurring costs pursuant to the grant contract – with the goal of contracts beginning on October 1. GOHS relies on the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division, Traffic Records Section and the NCSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (“FARS”) for the data contained in the HSP. 8 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan COMPONENTS OF THE HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN • Alcohol and Other Drugs (AL) - To reduce the number and severity of crashes in which alcohol and/or drugs are contributing factors. • Occupant Protection (OP) - To increase the statewide seat belt / child safety seat (CSS) usage rate of motor vehicle occupants and to increase public information and education of the benefits of seat belt / CSS usage for adults and children. • Police Traffic Services (PT) - To achieve and maintain compliance with traffic laws such as aggressive driving, speeding and red light running. Enforcement must be consistent, impartial and uniformly applied to all street and highway users. • Traffic Records (TR) -To develop a comprehensive data processing system that brings together the engineering, enforcement, educational, medical, behavioral health, prosecution, judicial, correctional, and emergency response disciplines. • Emergency Medical Services (EM) - To support rural first responders with emergency medical services (EMS) equipment. • Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Safety (MC/PS) - To increase the public's awareness and understanding of and participation in motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian safety. • Roadway Safety (RS) -To improve traffic conditions in identified corridors and local jurisdictions by funding minor traffic engineering improvements, correcting signing deficiencies and promoting safety programs. Arizona’s FFY 2011 HSP is: • A working document that is revised throughout the year to accommodate programmatic changes or to introduce new or additional countermeasures. • A statewide overview and detailed summaries of traffic safety data as well as project/program descriptions, objectives, costs, and time frames • Operational during FFY 2011 which commences October 1, 2010 and ends September 30, 2011; • A budget for the allocation of available funding; • The opportunity by which the State is able to secure federal highway safety funds under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). 9 Problem Identification Overview | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan FUNDING Funding resources are estimated during the summer as the Highway Safety Plan is developed. The estimations are developed by using the previous year’s allocated amounts and may include carry-forward funding from prior fiscal years. Actual amounts are obligated by Congress and may differ from the estimated amounts. The amounts listed below are estimated as of the date this Highway Safety Plan was finalized. Program Area 402 408 410 2010 Total HSP Funding (Estimated) Amount Funded (Estimated) $ 3,998,479.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 2,000,923.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 6,599,402.00 Funding by Program Area 2010, $200,000.00 410, $2,000,923.00 408, $400,000.00 402, $3,998,479.00 10 Funding | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Funding by Program Area % of Total 2010, 3.03% 410, 30.32% 408, 6.06% 402, 60.59% 11 Funding | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Budgeted Funding by Program Area RS, $59,750.00 PT, $1,263,083.00 PA, $370,000.00 AI, $113,220.00 PS, $106,377.00 OP, $600,023.00 MS, $210,000.00 TR, $410,000.00 EM, $69,615.00 AL, $3,397,334.00 Funding by Program Area % of Total RS, 0.91% PT, 19.16% PA, 5.61% AI, 1.72% PS, 1.61% OP, 9.10% MS, 3.19% EM, 1.06% TR, 6.22% AL, 51.53% 12 Funding | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The primary highway safety goal for Arizona is to reduce fatalities across all program areas. The data utilized for the FFY 2011 HSP comes from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (“FARS”) and the Arizona Department of Transportation Traffic Records Section (“ADOT”). As of August 2010, GOHS does not have all of the crash fact data available for 2009. The data presented herein is as up to date as possible. The preliminary 2009 data received from ADOT indicates that there were 806 fatalities in Arizona and 261 alcohol fatalities. This represents a 13.98% decrease in overall fatalities from 2008 (937 to 806) and a 1.88% decrease in alcohol fatalities from 2008 (266 to 261). VMT data for 2009 was not available in August 2010. Arizona Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities by Month 68 84 90 85 87 67 85 88 91 73 66 53 2009 TOTAL 64 63 61 88 70 89 60 61 64 57 66 63 2009 URBAN* 32 34 35 51 24 24 34 31 32 26 32 31 2009 RURAL* 32 29 26 37 46 65 26 30 32 31 34 32 1,071 937 806 386 420 1.70 1.53 *** MONTH 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 71 71 74 83 98 86 107 79 90 95 87 96 64 66 88 92 99 78 90 105 91 112 86 86 101 97 95 90 93 98 99 93 92 102 86 86 85 76 85 91 111 84 93 99 97 102 107 95 82 86 91 114 99 87 88 115 105 92 102 98 101 90 112 108 81 101 129 114 70 101 98 88 92 78 112 138 120 106 130 119 118 115 92 81 63 82 91 113 89 95 97 87 97 88 92 77 TOTAL **FATALITY RATE 1,037 1,057 1,132 1,125 1,159 1,193 1,301 2.14 2.08 2.18 2.11 2.02 2.03 2.08 *2009 urban and rural data was compiled from FARS **Fatality rate is the number of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled ***Data will be provided when available NOTE: All other data compiled from ALISS as of July 31, 2010 13 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Total Fatalities 1400 1200 Fatalities 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Fatalities 1037 1057 1132 1125 1159 1193 1301 1071 937 806 Year Fatality Rate per 100 MM VMT 2.50 Rate per 100 Million VMT 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fatality Rate per 100 MM 2.14 VMT 2.08 2.18 2.11 2.02 2.03 2.08 1.70 1.53 14 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities by Year Data: FARS 1400 1200 1000 Fatalities 800 600 400 200 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Fatalities 1151 1179 1293 1071 937 806 Alcohol Fatalities 334 375 399 337 266 261 Year Total Fatalities Alcohol Fatalities Alcohol Fatalities Percent 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1151 1179 1293 1071 937 806 334 375 399 337 266 261 29% 32% 31% 31% 28% 32% Year to Year Percentage Change Alcohol Fatalities Year to Year Percentage Change Total Fatalities 12.28% 6.40% -15.54% -21.07% -1.88% 2.43% 9.67% -17.17% -12.51% -13.98% 15 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Annual Trends in Total Fatalities Data: ADOT 15.00% Annual Percent Change 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% -10.00% -15.00% -20.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % Change Total Fatalities 1.93% 7.10% -0.62% 3.02% 2.93% 9.05% -17.68% -12.51% -13.98% Annual Trends in Alcohol Fatalities Data: FARS 15.00% Annual Percent Change 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% -10.00% -15.00% -20.00% -25.00% % Change Alcohol Fatalities 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 12.28% 6.40% -15.54% -21.07% -1.88% 16 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan FFY 2011 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Pursuant to 23 CFR 1200.10(a)(1), GOHS is including 10 Core Outcome Performance Measures and 1 Core Behavior Measure in the FFY 10 HSP. The data for the Performance Measures comes from FARS, unless otherwise noted. CORE OUTCOME MEASURES (10) Traffic Fatalities (FARS) C-1) To decrease traffic fatalities seven percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 938 to 872 by December 31, 2011. Serious Traffic Injuries (State Crash Data Files) C-2) To decrease serious traffic injuries 10 percent from the 2008-2009 calendar base year average of 51,736 injuries to 46,562 injuries by December 31, 2011. Fatalities/VMT (FARS/FHWA) C-3a) To decrease total fatalities/VMT five percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 1.77 to 1.68 by December 31, 2011. C-3b) To decrease rural fatalities/VMT from the 2005-2007 calendar base year average of 2.99 to 2.84 by December 31, 2011. C-3c) To decrease urban fatalities/VMT from the 2005-2007 calendar base year average of 1.44 to 1.37 by December 31, 2011. Unrestrained Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities (FARS) C-4) To decrease unrestrained passenger vehicle occupant fatalities in all seating positions eight percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 237 to 218 by December 31, 2011. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities (FARS) C-5) To decrease alcohol impaired driving fatalities 10 percent from the 2007-2009 calendar base year average of 288 to 259 by December 31, 2011. Speeding Related Fatalities (FARS) C-6) To decrease speeding-related fatalities 10 percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 470 to 423 by December 31, 2011. Motorcyclist Fatalities (FARS) C-7) To decrease motorcycle fatalities two percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 139 to 136 by December 31, 2011. 17 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Unhelmeted Motorcyclist Fatalities (FARS) C-8) To decrease unhelmeted motorcyclist fatalities four percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 75 to 72 by December 31, 2011. Drivers Age 20 or Younger Involved in Fatal Crashes (FARS) C-9) To decrease drivers age 20 or younger involved in fatal crashes 10 percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 185 to 166 by December 31, 2011. Pedestrian Fatalities (FARS) C-10) To reduce pedestrian fatalities 10 percent from the 2006-2008 calendar base year average of 147 to 132 by December 31, 2011. CORE BEHAVIOR MEASURE (1) Seat Belt Use Rate (Observed Seat Belt Use Survey) B-1) To increase statewide observed seat belt use of front seat outboard occupants in passenger vehicles one percentage point from the 2008-2010 calendar base year average usage rate of 80.85 percent to 81.85 percent by December 31, 2011. 18 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TRAFFIC SAFETY PERFORMANCE (CORE OUTCOME) MEASURES FOR ARIZONA Core Outcome Measures Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total 1,151 1,179 1,293 1,071 937 806 Rural 594 536 650 516 473 420 Urban 546 643 641 555 464 386 Unknown 11 0 2 0 0 Total 2.01 1.97 2.07 1.70 1.52 NA Rural 3.42 3.06 3.27 2.63 2.59 NA Urban 1.37 1.52 1.51 1.28 1.07 NA 799 739 868 699 583 NA Restrained 276 254 277 238 196 NA Unrestrained 424 406 469 379 320 NA Unknown 99 79 122 82 67 NA Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities (BAC = .08+)** 334 375 399 337 266 261 Speeding-Related Fatalities 408 519 584 452 373 NA Total 119 138 142 135 141 NA Helmeted 35 58 45 54 64 NA Unhelmeted 76 74 91 71 64 NA Unknown 8 6 6 10 13 NA Total 1,506 1,578 1,720 1,430 1,236 NA Aged Under 15 7 2 3 3 1 NA Aged 15-20 206 210 222 177 148 NA Aged Under 21 213 212 225 180 149 NA Aged 21 and Over 1,213 1,290 1,412 1,205 1,036 NA Unknown Age 80 76 83 45 51 NA 130 158 167 154 120 NA 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 93.90% 78.90% 80.90% 79.90% 80.80% 81.80% Traffic Fatalities Fatalities Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Driven Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities Total (All Seat Positions) Motorcyclist Fatalities Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes Pedestrian Fatalities Year Daytime Front Seat Passenger Vehicle Occupants (Observed) *NA = As of August 1, 2010 Data Not Yet Available 19 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Seatbelt and Child Safety Restraint Usage 100% 90% 80% Usage Rate 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Seat Belt Usage % '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 53.2%58.0%54.6%63.4%58.3%71.1%75.2%74.4%73.8%85.8%95.3%93.3%78.9%80.9%79.9%80.8%81.80 Child Restraint Usage % 36.9%39.5%44.9%75.6%80.1%87.0%71.7%72.0%71.4%89.7%97.6%95.2%88.4%86.2%80.1%87.2%78.0% 20 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Fatality Rates: Arizona, U.S. and Best State Fatalities 1,151 42,836 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled (Millions) 57,336 2,964,788 1,179 43,510 59,799 2,989,430 1,293 42,708 62,468 3,014,371 1,071 41,259 62,963 3,032,399 937 37,261 61,628 2,973,509 806 NA NA NA Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Fatalities Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled 2.01 1.44 0.87 1.97 1.46 0.80 2.07 1.42 0.78 1.70 1.36 0.79 1.52 1.25 0.67 NA NA NA Total Population 5,750,475 292,892,127 5,961,239 295,560,549 6,178,251 298,362,973 6,353,421 301,290,332 6,500,180 304,059,724 6,595,778 304,059,724 Fatalities Per 100,000 Population 20.02 14.63 7.39 19.78 14.72 6.85 20.93 14.31 6.32 16.86 13.69 6.55 14.41 12.25 5.59 NA NA NA *NA = As of August 1, 2010 Data Not Yet Available 21 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities By The Highest Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) in the Crash Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Highest BAC level in the Crash BAC = .01+ BAC = .08+ Total Fatalities in all Crashes 1,151 42,836 Number 446 16,919 1,179 43,510 508 17,590 1,293 42,708 578 17,738 1,071 41,259 466 17,158 937 37,261 393 15,438 Percent 39 39 25 43 40 14 45 42 24 44 42 24 42 41 21 Number 385 14,593 446 15,102 480 15,144 403 14,603 328 13,294 Percent 33 34 21 38 35 12 37 35 20 38 35 21 35 36 16 Per 100 Million VMT 0.67 0.49 0.27 0.75 0.51 0.14 0.77 0.50 0.22 0.64 0.48 0.23 0.53 0.45 0.16 22 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Alcohol-Impaired Driving Total Fatalities (BAC = .08+) Per Fatalities 100 in all Million Crashes Number Percent VMT Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State 1,151 42,836 1,179 43,510 1,293 42,708 1,071 41,259 937 37,261 806 NA 334 13,099 29 31 0.58 0.44 375 13,582 20 32 31 0.25 0.63 0.45 399 13,491 12 31 32 0.13 0.64 0.45 337 13,041 18 31 32 0.20 0.54 0.43 266 11,773 19 28 32 0.21 0.43 0.40 261 NA 16 32 NA 0.16 NA NA NA NA *NA = As of August 1, 2010 Data Not Yet Available 23 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan BAC Reporting Rates for Drivers/Operators Involved in Fatal Crashes Surviving Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Killed Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Total Drivers/Motorcycle Riders With Blood Alcohol Alcohol Alcohol Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent Total Concentration (BAC) Results Reported to FARS Number Percent 897 31,524 57 8,215 609 26,871 299 18,275 1,506 58,395 356 26,490 928 31,729 52 7,415 650 27,491 321 18,773 1,578 59,220 373 26,188 1,018 30,498 252 7,482 702 27,348 491 18,911 1,720 57,846 743 26,393 851 29,449 246 7,631 579 26,570 457 19,434 1,430 56,019 703 27,065 717 26,011 190 6,677 519 24,175 332 17,045 1,236 50,186 522 23,722 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State 6 26 80 6 23 77 25 25 81 29 26 82 26 26 80 49 68 97 49 68 98 70 69 99 79 73 100 64 71 95 24 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 24 45 82 24 44 84 43 46 85 49 48 84 42 47 84 Daytime Front Seat Restraint Use Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Arizona US Best State Fatalities - Restrained Percent Fatalities - Restrained Percent 51 56 82 52 55 88 45 55 77 50 57 82 51 56 78 95 80 95 94 82 95 79 81 96 81 82 98 80 83 97 25 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities Age 5 and Above Lives Saved Estimates Fatalities Age 5 and Above Additional Lives Savable Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Restrained Unrestrained Unknown Restraint Use 775 731 845 681 575 269 250 268 226 193 408 403 465 375 318 98 78 112 80 64 Percent Known Restrained* Lives Saved at Current Belt Use 40 38 37 38 38 376 346 366 298 260 at 100% Belt Usage 47 54 175 135 113 Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities Age 4 and Below Percent Known Restrained* Lives Saved Estimates Lives Saved at Current Seat Belt and Child Safety Seat Usage 50 67 69 79 60 6 5 13 20 5 Fatalities Age 4 and Under Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Restrained Unrestrained Unknown Restraint Use 10 6 16 15 5 5 4 9 11 3 5 2 4 3 2 0 0 3 1 0 26 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Motorcyclist Fatalities by Helmet Use Fatalities Lives Saved Estimates Total Helmeted 119 138 142 135 141 35 58 45 54 64 Unhelmeted Unknown Helmet Use Percent Known Helmeted* Additional Lives Savable Lives Saved at 100% at Current Helmet Helmet Use Usage 76 74 91 71 64 8 6 6 10 13 32 44 33 43 50 22 36 29 35 42 Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 31 29 35 29 26 Fatalities by Person Type Person Type Occupants Motorcyclists Nonoccupants Totals: Passenger Car Light Truck - Pickup Light Truck - Utility Light Truck - Van Light Truck - Other Large Truck Bus Other/Unknown Occupants Total Occupants Total Motorcyclists Pedestrian Bicyclist and Other Cyclist Other/Unknown Nonoccupants Total Nonoccupants 2004 # % 2005 # % 2006 # % 2007 # % 2008 # % 396 176 153 71 3 17 2 53 871 119 130 27 4 161 353 175 139 71 1 15 0 88 842 138 158 35 6 199 425 212 171 57 3 21 0 62 951 142 167 29 4 200 357 167 140 35 0 20 0 34 753 135 154 21 8 183 292 129 128 34 0 19 0 49 651 141 120 19 6 145 34 15 13 6 0 1 0 5 76 10 11 2 0 14 30 15 12 6 0 1 0 7 71 12 13 3 1 17 33 16 13 4 0 2 0 5 74 11 13 2 0 15 33 16 13 3 0 2 0 3 70 13 14 2 1 17 1,151 100 1,179 100 1,293 100 1,071 100 937 27 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 31 14 14 4 0 2 0 5 69 15 13 2 1 15 100 Fatalities by Crash Type Crash Type Total Fatalities (All Crashes)* (1) Single Vehicle (2) Involving a Large Truck (3) Involving Speeding (4) Involving a Rollover (5) Involving a Roadway Departure (6) Involving an Intersection (or Intersection Related) 2004 1,151 662 106 408 462 562 236 2005 1,179 661 118 519 417 526 268 2006 1,293 701 136 584 495 535 318 2007 1,071 615 98 452 413 506 269 2008 937 560 97 373 353 415 230 Motorcyclist Fatalities by Age Age Year <20 20 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 >59 Totals 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14 13 13 12 3 23 34 34 22 36 20 26 23 28 20 31 29 28 35 30 26 24 33 23 27 5 12 11 15 25 119 138 142 135 141 Motorcyclist Fatalities per 100,000 Registered Motorcyclists Motorcycle Fatalities Per Total 100,000 Motorcyclist Motorcycle Motorcycle Year Fatalities Registrations Registrations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 119 138 142 135 141 209,048 98,703 114,443 125,219 134,434 56.92 139.8 124.1 107.8 104.9 28 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Fatalities by Person Type and Race/Origin Person Type by Race/Hispanic Origin 2004 2005 2006 2007 Occupants (All Vehicle Types) Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic American Indian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Asian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Multiple Races, Non-Hispanic/Unknown All Other Non-Hispanic Races Unknown Race and Unknown Hispanic Total 266 440 26 82 4 0 0 13 159 990 311 374 28 108 5 1 1 143 9 980 347 538 26 107 4 0 0 61 10 1,093 266 463 28 107 2 0 0 18 4 888 Non-Occupants (Pedestrians, Pedalcyclists and Other/Unknown Non-Occupants) Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic American Indian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Asian, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic/Unknown Multiple Races, Non-Hispanic/Unknown All Other Non-Hispanic Races Unknown Race and Unknown Hispanic Total 47 57 0 19 0 0 0 0 38 161 60 65 6 29 1 0 0 37 1 199 64 80 5 34 0 0 0 15 2 200 54 87 5 33 2 0 0 0 2 183 1,151 1,179 1,293 1,071 Totals: 29 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 5 Year Trend for the Top 10 Counties of 2008 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Maricopa County Pima County Pinal County Mohave County Coconino County Apache County Yavapai County Navajo County Cochise County Fatalities 2004 2005 458 524 148 137 94 84 53 61 58 62 54 32 79 73 51 45 53 47 10 Yuma County 27 37 37 31 26 2 3 3 3 3 Sub Total 1. Top Ten Counties 1,076 1,105 1,210 1,009 875 94 94 94 94 93 Sub Total 2. All Other Counties 74 73 83 62 62 6 6 6 6 7 All Counties 1,150 1,178 1,293 1,071 937 100 100 100 100 100 Counties by 2008 Ranking Total 2006 564 154 131 61 82 33 72 41 35 2007 461 129 86 52 56 50 59 56 21 2008 368 137 81 57 51 45 41 36 33 Percent of Total 2004 2005 40 44 13 12 8 7 5 5 5 5 5 3 7 6 4 4 5 4 2006 44 12 10 5 6 3 6 3 3 2007 43 12 8 5 5 5 6 5 2 2008 39 15 9 6 5 5 4 4 4 30 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 5 Year Trend for the Top 10 Counties of 2008 – Fatalities Year to Year Percent Change Percent Change From Fatalities Previous Year Counties by 2008 Ranking 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2008 1 Maricopa County 458 524 564 461 368 14 8 -18 -20 2 Pima County 148 137 154 129 137 -7 12 -16 6 3 Pinal County 94 84 131 86 81 -11 56 -34 -6 4 Mohave County 53 61 61 52 57 15 0 -15 10 5 Coconino County 58 62 82 56 51 7 32 -32 -9 6 Apache County 54 32 33 50 45 -41 3 52 -10 7 Yavapai County 79 73 72 59 41 -8 -1 -18 -31 8 Navajo County 51 45 41 56 36 -12 -9 37 -36 9 Cochise County 53 47 35 21 33 -11 -26 -40 57 10 Yuma County 27 37 37 31 26 37 0 -16 -16 Sub Total 1. Top Ten Counties 1,076 1,105 1,210 1,009 875 3 10 -17 -13 Sub Total 2. All Other Counties 74 73 83 62 62 -1 14 -25 0 Total All Counties 1,150 1,178 1,293 1,071 937 2 10 -17 -13 31 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 5 Year Trend for the Top 10 Counties of 2008 – Fatality Rates Counties by 2008 Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sub Total 1. Sub Total 2. Total La Paz County Apache County Gila County Coconino County Greenlee County Navajo County Mohave County Cochise County Pinal County Graham County Top Ten Counties All Other Counties All Counties Fatalities Per 100,000 Population 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 142.64 79.48 49.18 47.06 0.00 48.56 29.73 43.05 42.63 175.83 46.88 35.37 49.74 27.43 42.07 32.82 37.45 35.42 135.28 47.61 42.77 65.10 107.41 37.64 31.68 27.62 48.75 144.34 71.77 46.21 43.97 12.92 50.41 26.55 16.42 28.58 99.57 64.10 42.17 39.67 37.49 31.93 29.04 25.58 24.75 27.75 24.53 29.97 22.87 21.95 45.44 40.60 45.13 36.69 32.94 13.86 14.74 15.73 12.40 10.72 20.00 19.76 20.93 16.86 14.41 32 Goals and Performance Measures | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan STATE CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES Failure to comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations and directives may subject State officials to civil or criminal penalties and/or place the State in a high risk grantee status in accordance with 49 CFR 18.12. Each fiscal year the State will sign these Certifications and Assurances that the State complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include, but not limited to, the following: 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 - Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments 23 CFR Chapter II - (§§1200, 1205, 1206, 1250, 1251, & 1252) Regulations governing highway safety programs NHTSA Order 462-6C - Matching Rates for State and Community Highway Safety Programs Highway Safety Grant Funding Policy for Field-Administered Grants Section 402 Requirements The Governor is responsible for the administration of the State highway safety program through a State highway safety agency which has adequate powers and is suitably equipped and organized (as evidenced by appropriate oversight procedures governing such areas as procurement, financial administration, and the use, management, and disposition of equipment) to carry out the program (23 USC 402(b) (1) (A)); The political subdivisions of this State are authorized, as part of the State highway safety program, to carry out within their jurisdictions local highway safety programs which have been approved by the Governor and are in accordance with the uniform guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Transportation (23 USC 402(b) (1) (B)); At least 40 per cent of all Federal funds apportioned to this State under 23 USC 402 for this fiscal year will be expended by or for the benefit of the political subdivision of the State in carrying out local highway safety programs (23 USC 402(b) (1) (C)), unless this requirement is waived in writing; This State's highway safety program provides adequate and reasonable access for the safe and convenient movement of physically handicapped persons, including those in wheelchairs, across curbs constructed or replaced on or after July 1, 1976, at all pedestrian crosswalks (23 USC 402(b) (1) (D)); The State will implement activities in support of national highway safety goals to reduce motor vehicle related fatalities that also reflect the primary data-related crash factors within the State as identified by the State highway safety planning process, including: National law enforcement mobilizations, Sustained enforcement of statutes addressing impaired driving, occupant protection, and driving in excess of posted speed limits, 33 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan An annual statewide safety belt use survey in accordance with criteria established by the Secretary for the measurement of State safety belt use rates to ensure that the measurements are accurate and representative, Development of statewide data systems to provide timely and effective data analysis to support allocation of highway safety resources. The State shall actively encourage all relevant law enforcement agencies in the State to follow the guidelines established for vehicular pursuits issued by the International Association of Chiefs of Police that are currently in effect. (23 USC 402 (b)(1)(E). Other Federal Requirements Cash drawdowns will be initiated only when actually needed for disbursement. 49 CFR 18.20 Cash disbursements and balances will be reported in a timely manner as required by NHTSA. 49 CFR 18.21. The same standards of timing and amount, including the reporting of cash disbursement and balances, will be imposed upon any secondary recipient organizations. 49 CFR 18.41. Failure to adhere to these provisions may result in the termination of drawdown privileges. The State has submitted appropriate documentation for review to the single point of contact designated by the Governor to review Federal programs, as required by Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs); Equipment acquired under this agreement for use in highway safety program areas shall be used and kept in operation for highway safety purposes by the State; or the State, by formal agreement with appropriate officials of a political subdivision or State agency, shall cause such equipment to be used and kept in operation for highway safety purposes 23 CFR 1200.21 The State will comply with all applicable State procurement procedures and will maintain a financial management system that complies with the minimum requirements of 49 CFR 18.20; Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act The State will report for each sub-grant awarded: Name of the entity receiving the award; Amount of the award; Information on the award including transaction type, funding agency, the North American Industry Classification System code or Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number (where applicable), program source; Location of the entity receiving the award and the primary location of performance under the award, including the city, State, congressional district, and country; , and an award title descriptive of the purpose of each funding action; A unique identifier (DUNS); 34 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan The names and total compensation of the five most highly compensated officers of the entity if-- of the entity receiving the award and of the parent entity of the recipient, should the entity be owned by another entity; (i) the entity in the preceding fiscal year received— (I) 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and(II) $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and(ii) the public does not have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; Other relevant information specified by the Office of Management and Budget in subsequent guidance or regulation. The State highway safety agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin (and 49 CFR Part 21); (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101, et seq.; PL 101-336), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities (and 49 CFR Part 27); (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970(P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse of alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, which provides that any portion of a state or local entity receiving federal funds will obligate all programs or activities of that entity to comply with these civil rights laws; and, (k) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. The Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988(41 U.S.C. 702;): The State will provide a drug-free workplace by: a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: 1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace. 2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. 3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. 35 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace. c. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a). d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will -1. Abide by the terms of the statement. 2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction. e. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. f. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted 1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination. 2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. g. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) above. Buy America Act The State will comply with the provisions of the Buy America Act (49 U.S.C. 5323(j)) which contains the following requirements: Only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States may be purchased with Federal funds unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestic purchases would be inconsistent with the public interest; that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality; or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. Clear justification for the purchase of non-domestic items must be in the form of a waiver request submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation. 36 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Political Activity (Hatch Act) The State will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Certification Regarding Federal Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subaward at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Restriction on State Lobbying None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal. 37 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension Instructions for Primary Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. 2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction. 3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 5. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meaning set out in the Definitions and coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification , in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each 38 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan participant may, but is not required to, check the list of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. 9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of record, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Instructions for Lower Tier Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 39 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan 3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definition and Coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that is it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. (See below) 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions: 1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. 2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 40 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Environmental Impact The Governor's Representative for Highway Safety has reviewed the State's Fiscal Year highway safety planning document and hereby declares that no significant environmental impact will result from implementing this Highway Safety Plan. If, under a future revision, this Plan will be modified in such a manner t hat a project would be instituted that could affect environmental quality to t he extent that a review and statement would be necessary, t his office is prepared to take the action necessary to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 USC 4321 et seq.) and the implementing regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR Parts 1500-1517). Governor's Representative for Highway Safety State 2Q(I For Fiscal Year ~-24-2o(b Date State Certifications and Assurances I Arizona Governor's Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 201 1 Highway Safety Plan Policy to Ban Text Messaging While Driving In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to: Adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving including policies to ban text messaging while driving— Company‐owned or –rented vehicles, or Government‐owned, leased or rented vehicles; or Privately‐owned when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. Conduct workplace safety iniatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as – Establishment of new rules and programs or re‐evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving; and Education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. 42 State Certifications and Assurances | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM GOAL: TO EFFICIENTLY AND EFFECTIVELY MANAGE ARIZONA’S HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Planning and Administration (“PA”) program area includes those activities and costs necessary for the overall management and operations of the Arizona GOHS. The Director of the GOHS is responsible for Arizona’s Highway Safety Program and serves as the Governor’s Highway Safety Representative. As the Governor’s representative, the GOHS Director participates in activities that impact the highway safety programs and policies nationwide. GOHS staff activities include, grant writing, monitoring and auditing, evaluating project accomplishments, preparing reports for the GOHS Director and coordinate training opportunities. PERFORMANCE PLAN It is the goal of the Planning and Administration Program to provide the management, supervision, and support services for the activities necessary to operate the Highway Safety Program in the State of Arizona. The performance measures to support this goal include: • • • • • • • Process all grants to subgrantees by start of Federal Fiscal Year on October 1 Monitor all grants at least once in the fiscal year Develop a coordinated Highway Safety Plan (HSP) by September 1 of each calendar year. Develop, coordinate, monitor and evaluate traffic safety projects identified in the HSP Promote highway safety awareness through educational programs and public awareness campaigns Prepare the Annual Evaluation Report by December 31st of each calendar year Utilize all available means for improving and promoting Arizona’s Highway Safety Program 43 Planning and Administration | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: This task will provide funding to the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety to coordinate and monitor activities and projects relating to the planning and administration of the Arizona Highway Safety Program. Agency GOHS Amount $370,000 Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, Chairmen of the Arizona Senate and House Public Safety Committees, Police Chiefs, Sheriffs, Officers, GOHS Director and NHTSA Region IX Administrator at Holiday DUI Task Force Kick Off Press Conference at the Arizona State Capitol, December 2009 44 Planning and Administration | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM GOAL: TO PROVIDE TRAINING AND RESOURCES FOR VEHICULAR CRIMES UNITS TO MORE EFFECTIVELY AIDE IN THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF FATAL TRAFFIC COLLISIONS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Accident investigation (“AI”) is a program administered by agencies funded by GOHS in order to verify the parameters of a crash, the demarcations of the crash, the exact location of the crash – both in a state highway or a city/county street, to produce an investigative report that will show where the vehicles were positioned before and after the crash by considering skid marks, debris and position of the vehicles at the point of impact (“PI”) and at the point of rest (“PR”) in order to determine the causation and consequences of the crash. AI reports include statements from witnesses, victims and other drivers in order to determine where the fault lies with the crash and whether citations should be issued. AI is primarily done by electronic equipment, like Accident Investigation Measurement System (“AIMS”), GPS Tracking and one man stations that provide the investigator with exact technical data that will produce a reproduction of the crash. Most cities have intersections on GPS so they can draw the accident report into a diagram by superimposing PI’s and PR’s into the exact location of the incident. The Vehicular Crimes Units (“VCU”) for agencies provide this service. AZ DPS provides these services for smaller jurisdictions that are unable to afford sophisticated equipment. Equipment and overtime provided to these investigators is critical to reporting the crash where there are injuries or fatalities involved that will end up being discussed in court – both criminal and civil. PERFORMANCE PLAN EQUIPMENT GOHS provides funding for crash mapping software, AIMS and Nikkon Total Station Kits, to help agencies in their duties investigating traffic accidents. Agencies funded by GOHS often provide accident investigation and reconstruction services to neighboring agencies without necessary equipment to perform this function on their own. 45 Accident Investigation | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TRAINING Funding is provided for agencies to receive IPTM training in accident investigation and reconstruction. SECTION 402 TASKS TASK 1 – ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to purchase equipment to aid in their VCU in the investigation and reconstruction of traffic accidents. Funding will be provided for crash mapping and CDR software, two AIMS units, one Nikkon total station units, tripods for cameras, one vericom accelerometer and one AIMS battery. Agency Salt River PD Camp Verde MO Yavapai CSO Pima CSO Phoenix PD Tempe PD Thatcher PD Total Amount $ 32,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,550 $ 2,400 $ 72,950 TASK 2 – ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION TRAINING Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to receive training through the Institute of Police Technology and Management in accident investigation and reconstruction. Agency Tempe PD Glendale PD Maricopa CSO Salt River PD Total 46 Amount $ 10,230 $ 6,300 $ 2,480 $ 2,395 $ 21,405 Accident Investigation | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 3 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage section 402 accident investigation programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS 47 Amount $18,865 Accident Investigation | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING FATALITIES, INJURIES AND CRASHES THROUGH ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Alcohol and drug-related fatalities continue to be a leading cause of death on Arizona roads and highways. In 2009, Arizona saw a 1.88 percent decrease in alcohol-related fatalities from 2008, with 261 individuals killed as a result of alcohol-related accidents. Alcohol-impaired fatalities per 100 million VMT decreased from 0.54 in 2007 to 0.43 in 2008 (slightly above the national average of 0.43). In 2009, the Arizona Supreme Court reported that there were 82,719 charges for DUI and Extreme DUI, a 3.42 percent decrease over 2008. To combat the prevalence of impaired driving, GOHS devotes a significant amount of resources to overtime enforcement, equipment and training for law enforcement officers statewide. Arizona law enforcement officers and prosecutors are aided by some of the toughest DUI laws in the country. Arizona’s Impaired Driving Program utilizes enforcement, education and public awareness to reduce the number of fatalities and injuries resulting from alcohol-impaired collisions. GOHS will continue to fund these programs which have proven to be successful in reducing the number of alcohol-related fatalities, increasing the number of DUI arrests and continuing to keep Arizona’s highways and roadways safe. Arizona’s DUI enforcement program includes two parallel enforcement activities: (1) year-long sustained enforcement efforts and (2) periodic enhanced enforcement campaigns (such as Holiday DUI Task Force enforcement efforts). The goal of Arizona’s DUI Enforcement efforts is to identify areas that have a high frequency of fatal and/or serious injury collisions and devote resources to these locations in an effort to reduce alcoholrelated fatalities. Public awareness activities, consisting of earned and paid media efforts will focus on increasing the public’s awareness of ongoing statewide DUI enforcement activities. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier conducts press conferences and frequent media interviews, in English and Spanish, throughout the year and during all Holiday enforcement campaigns. Earned media is supplemented by targeted paid media efforts emphasizing Arizona’s “Drive Hammered…Get Nailed!” slogan, including radio and print ads and sponsorship of the Arizona Cardinals. In addition to high visibility enforcement and media campaigns, GOHS places a large emphasis on training law enforcement officers in Standardized Field Sobriety Test (“SFST”) and Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (“HGN”) training, Law Enforcement Phlebotomy Training, 48 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Drug Recognition Expert (“DRE”) courses, Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (“ARIDE”) and Drug Impaired Training for Educational Professionals (“DITEP”) courses. GOHS also conducts training for prosecutors and judges on DUI law issues through the Arizona Prosecuting Attorney’s Advisory Council (“APAAC”) and the Arizona Supreme Court. GOHS devotes resources to enforce underage drinking laws through partnerships with MADD and SADD. Additional funding is devoted to agencies to conduce underage drinking enforcement efforts, examples include Phoenix Police Department’s “Party Crew” enforcement, and programs in Yavapai County. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Priority funding is given to agencies that have proven to be the most successful with funding received from past GOHS grant awards. Participating agencies received funding based on number of DUI arrests, fatalities and injuries over the previous three years. In FFY 2011, GOHS is providing Section 402 Alcohol funding to 56 agencies and Section 410 Alcohol funding to 14 agencies conduct high visibility enforcement campaigns. In calendar year 2009, DUI arrests made as part of reported DUI enforcement (funded by Sections 410, 410 High Fatality and 410 High Visibility) increased 36% over the prior year. Through the first six months of 2010, DUI Task Force enforcement details have arrested 8,521 drivers for DUI – a pace that if sustained through the end of the year will represent a 20% increase over 2009. Arizona’s successful DUI enforcement efforts are attributable to law enforcement officers being highly trained to develop the necessary skills, knowledge and abilities to detect drivers impaired by alcohol, arrest and aide in the successful prosecution of these offenders. EDUCATION GOHS devotes a significant amount of resources toward the training of officers in areas such as SFST, DRE, HGN, DUI report writing and testimony, law enforcement phlebotomy, ARIDE and DITEP. It is a direct result of these training opportunities that Arizona continues to be the national leader in the number of officers that are certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) and DRE Instructors. Arizona’s robust DRE training program has proven to be a successful model for other states to adopt, consequently, Arizona provides training to law enforcement officials from other states and countries. Through the first six months of calendar year 2010, with funding from GOHS, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office hosted 48 certification nights, with 878 urine samples collected from subjects – with officers conducting over 1,600 DREs. Due to the prevalence of alcohol and drug impaired drivers, GOHS places a large emphasis on the education and certification of DREs. Arizona’s law enforcement phlebotomy program provides training and certification to law enforcement officers by providing them the necessary tools to obtain blood for evidentiary purposes which aide in successful DUI prosecutions. Through DITEP training, GOHS provides hands-on practical education to law enforcement to identify the 10 signs and symptoms of alcohol and drug impairment in students at the High School and Junior High School level. 49 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan The funds invested in training law enforcement officers continue to demonstrate positive results. Arizona continues to be a national leader in DREs with 568 in 2009 (trailing only California), Arizona ranks 7th in the country with 5.3 evaluations per DRE. PUBLIC AWARENESS This past year under the direction of GOHS Director Alberto Gutier, GOHS expended $200,000 in paid media campaigns promoting the “Drive Hammered…Get Nailed!” theme. These funds supported billboard promotions, radio, television and print media. Last year, GOHS partnered with the Arizona Cardinals football club to promote sober designated drivers at Cardinals home football games and on the Cardinals radio broadcast. This year the Cardinals improved to be the fifth best team in the league for signing up designated drivers at home football games. GOHS is proud of the partnership established with the Cardinals and other statewide media to promote designated driving. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier conducts an annual press conference to kick off the Holiday DUI enforcement campaign at the State Capitol. This event is widely covered by local TV, radio and print media. Additionally, with GOHS’ online DUI reporting system, press releases during planned enforcement events are distributed to the media on a daily basis with updated impaired driving statistics from the previous evening’s activity, plus cumulative data. These releases provide constant news reports on DUI arrests and the importance—and pleas—to the public to reduce these numbers. GOHS Director Alberto Gutier is constantly doing radio, TV and newspaper interviews to expand on the reports. GOHS funding dictates that each agency receiving DUI enforcement funds conduct educational and public awareness campaigns in their respective communities. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – DUI ENFORCEMENT AND OVERTIME Project Summary: Federal 402 funds will support comprehensive impaired driving enforcement efforts throughout Arizona. Funding will support overtime and related employee related expenses to conduct high visibility enforcement efforts, DUI saturation patrols and checkpoints. Agency Salt River PD Scottsdale PD Yavapai CSO Kingman PD Marana PD FINAL 402 FUNDING AMOUNT $ 49,680 $ 43,192 $ 33,946 $ 32,623 $ 30,619 50 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan AZ Capital PD Cochise CSO Maricopa PD La Paz CSO Oro Valley PD Prescott PD Prescott Valley PD Maricopa CSO Avondale PD Navajo CSO Pima CCCD DPS Sierra Vista PD Surprise PD Buckeye PD Nogales PD Chino Valley PD Lake Havasu City PD Douglas PD Tolleson PD AZDLLC Flagstaff PD Payson PD Mohave CSO Cottonwood PD ASU PD Show Low PD Eagar PD Pascua Yaqui PD Casa Grande PD Safford PD Sahuarita PD El Mirage PD White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Pima PD Clarkdale PD Clifton PD St John’s PD Pinetop-Lakeside PD U of A PD Thatcher PD Snowflake Taylor PD Springerville PD Greenlee CSO Holbrook PD Benson PD $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 27,500 25,600 25,459 25,000 24,310 24,300 24,300 23,521 22,950 20,583 20,520 20,250 20,050 20,000 19,849 18,492 16,358 16,215 16,200 15,000 15,000 13,500 12,909 12,000 11,830 10,800 9,959 9,660 9,625 8,505 8,108 8,107 7,740 7,138 6,780 6,750 6,750 6,500 5,644 5,400 4,725 4,200 4,000 3,200 3,000 51 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Quartzsite PD San Luis PD Williams PD Parker PD Total $ $ $ $ $ 2,970 2,700 2,025 1,297 827,339 TASK 2 – DUI EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS Project Summary: This task provides funding for continued public education and awareness campaigns focused on youth alcohol programs. The court monitoring program by MADD in Maricopa and Pima Counties will assist GOHS and the TSRP in identifying efficient prosecution and adjudication of DUI and impaired driving cases. SADD will utilize these funds to educate youth statewide about the dangers associated with underage alcohol consumption and impaired driving. Funding will also be provided for the MADD and SADD national conferences. In partnership with law enforcement agencies and school districts GOHS is implementing a new program in FFY 2011 to reach out to high schools across the state to conduct programs to educate youth about the risks associated with underage alcohol consumption. Agency GOHS MADD MADD SADD Total Amount $ 15,000 $ 35,100 $ 27,850 $ 42,400 $ 120,350 TASK 3 – DUI TRAINING Project Summary: Most training for Arizona law enforcement officers is provided for out of Section 410 funds – training for SFST, DRE, Phlebotomy, HGN, ARIDE and DITEP. This task provides training for the annual DRE conference and to the DRE Technical Advisory Panel (“TAP”) meeting. Additional funding will be utilized for the annual GOHS training conference for prosecutors, judges and law enforcement personnel. This task will also provide funding for the 2011 Lifesavers conference to be held in Phoenix. Agency GOHS – DRE Conference GOHS Conference Lifesavers Phoenix PD – TAP DRE Meeting Total $ $ $ $ $ Amount 15,000 50,000 12,000 4,000 81,000 52 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 4 – DUI EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund equipment, such as Portable Breath Testing Devices (“PBT”), Phlebotomy supplies, Medtox drug testing kits, urine and blood kits, and gas cylinders used to calibrate PBTs and Intoxilyzers. PBTs are handheld instruments used in the field by law enforcement officers to provide a preliminary alcohol concentration on suspected alcohol/drug impaired drivers and underage alcohol offenders. Agency Maricopa CSO Mesa Police Department AZ DPS Pima CSO Phoenix PD ASU PD Cochise CSO Yavapai CSO El Mirage PD Chandler PD Phoenix PD Bullhead City PD AZ Capital PD Glendale PD Pinetop-Lakeside PD Surprise PD Tempe PD Payson PD Prescott PD Mohave CSO Lake Havasu City PD Sierra Vista PD Parker PD Benson PD Clarkdale PD Peoria PD Pima CCCD DPS Springerville PD St Johns PD Thatcher PD White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Tucson PD Total Amount $ 23,500 $ 19,000 $ 13,380 $ 12,500 $ 10,000 $ 8,776 $ 7,350 $ 5,852 $ 5,200 $ 5,000 $ 4,500 $ 3,330 $ 3,234 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,324 $ 2,220 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,674 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,200 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 150,540 53 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 5 – DUI MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES Project Summary: To provide funding for supplies such as PBT and Intoxilyzer mouthpieces, printing of training material, and other collateral material (such as pencils and badges for community events). Agency AZDLLC Pascua Yaqui PD Glendale PD Yavapai County Sheriff Maricopa CSO Safford PD Peoria PD Pinetop-Lakeside PD ASU PD Pinal CSO Clarkdale PD Total Amount $ 5,000 $ 2,950 $ 1,200 $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 200 $ 187 $ 180 $ 177 $ 120 $ 75 $ 11,589 TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Alcohol programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS - Personnel Amount $ 179,929 TASK 7 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ALCOHOL SURVEY Project Summary: GOHS will conduct an annual survey on alcohol, occupant protection and speeding behavior and perceptions about enforcement and media. Agency GOHS Amount $ 7,000 54 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 8 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION MATERIALS AND OUTREACH Project Summary: This task will support the development, printing and distribution of public information and education materials to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s DUI laws. Funding will additionally support GOHS’ “Highway Safety Days” at the Arizona State Fair to provide the public information and education about Arizona DUI laws and general traffic safety issues. Additionally, this task will support one dedicated storage unit for DUI PI&E materials. Agency GOHS – PI&E GOHS – Public Safety Days GOHS – Storage Unit Total Amount $ 10,000 $ 7,500 $ 1,164 $ 18,664 SECTION 410 TASK 1 – DUI ENFORCEMENT AND OVERTIME Project Summary: Federal 410 funds will support comprehensive impaired driving enforcement efforts throughout Arizona. Funding will support overtime and related employee related expenses to conduct high visibility enforcement efforts, DUI saturation patrols and checkpoints. Agency AZ DPS Pima CSO Tucson PD Maricopa CSO Phoenix PD Gilbert PD Mesa Police Department Chandler PD Tempe PD Glendale PD Phoenix PD Goodyear PD Pinal CSO Peoria PD Total Amount $ 270,000 $ 133,440 $ 118,449 $ 117,603 $ 104,000 $ 99,084 $ 88,324 $ 69,866 $ 58,446 $ 55,814 $ 52,000 $ 50,891 $ 47,840 $ 40,000 $ 1,305,757 55 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 2 – TRAFFIC SAFETY RESOURCE PROSECUTOR Project Summary: Arizona’s Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor assists prosecutors statewide in the adjudication of impaired driving cases. The TSRP will continue to focus on two goals: (1) increase the visibility of traffic safety cases with prosecutors and prosecutors’ visibility with the traffic safety community, and (2) increase the confidence of prosecutors to go into the courtroom. Funding will be provided for personnel services, employee related expenses, materials and supplies and travel. Agency City of Phoenix Prosecutor’s Office Amount $ 206,407 TASK 3 – IMPAIRED DRIVING TRAINING Project Summary: This task provides funding for training Arizona law enforcement officers in SFST, DRE, HGN, DUI report writing and testimony, law enforcement phlebotomy, ARIDE and DITEP. Funding supports expenses related to classes, including DRE and phlebotomy kits, textbooks and manuals, and travel. Agency GOHS - DRE Support GOHS - SFST Support GOHS - Phlebotomy Support Total Amount $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 TASK 4 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: GOHS will develop and implement paid media campaigns to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s DUI laws. This will include the creation of brochures, collateral material, print, electronic, radio and broadcast media. Agency GOHS Amount $200,000 TASK 5 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 410 Alcohol programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the 56 Alcohol and Other Drugs | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. This task will also support funding for Arizona’s Impaired Driving Coordinator. Agency GOHS 57 Amount $138,759 | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PROGRAM GOAL: TO SUPPORT RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND FIRE DISTRICTS WITH THE NECESSARY RESOURCES TO RESPOND TO TRAFFIC COLLISIONS IN RURAL ARIZONA. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS provides limited funding to predominantly rural fire departments and fire districts to purchase equipment to assist emergency responders at the scene of traffic accidents. According to 2009 FARS data, 52.11 percent of traffic fatalities in Arizona were rural (420), even though most of Arizona’s population resides in two counties – Maricopa and Pima. PERFORMANCE PLAN EQUIPMENT GOHS provides extraction equipment to fire departments and fire districts throughout Arizona. Need is determined on number of fatal accidents and response time for the agency and if the agency received grant funding from GOHS within the last 3 fiscal years. TRAINING GOHS provides funding to the agencies to for training in order to properly work the equipment provided. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – FIRST RESPONDER EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund the purchase of extrication equipment, including Hurst LKE 55 Combination tools (Jaws of Life), rescue struts, cribbing, air bags and portable generators with lights. 58 Emergency Medical Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Agency Sedona FD Pinewood FD Flagstaff FD Sun Lakes FD Total Amount $ 26,182 $ 20,293 $ 9,041 $ 2,866 $ 58,382 TASK 2 – TRAINING Project Summary: This task will provide funding for the Pinewood Fire District to receive training on their Hurst LKE 55 Combination tools. Agency Pinewood FD Amount $ 1,608 TASK 3 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 emergency medical services program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS - Personnel Amount $ 9,625 59 Emergency Medical Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan MOTORCYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF MOTORCYCLE FATALITIES. PROGRAM OVERVIEW According to 2008 FARS data, motorcycle fatalities increased 4.44 percent over 2007 from 135 to 141, representing the only core outcome measure to see an increase in fatalities. As a way to decrease motorcyclist fatalities, GOHS funds public awareness campaigns focusing on motorcycle safety and reminding the driving public to look out for motorcycles. Additionally, utilizing state motorcycle safety funds and with the Arizona Motorcycle Safety Advisory Council, GOHS funds statewide paid media campaigns promoting motorcycle safety. PERFORMANCE PLAN GOHS’ goal in creating public awareness campaigns for motorcycle safety is three-fold: 1. Inform the general public to watch out for motorcycles 2. Inform the motorcyclist to ride safely in accordance with state law 3. Educate the motorcycle community on the danger of riding under the influence TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 - GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ANNUAL SURVEY – MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS’ annual survey measuring the use of motorcycle helmets. This survey is conducted as part of GOHS’ annual seatbelt survey. GOHS – Annual Seatbelt Survey $ 10,000 SECTION 2010 TASK 1 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: GOHS will develop and implement paid media campaigns to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s motorcycle laws, including distracted riding. This will include the creation of brochures, collateral material, print, electronic, radio and broadcast media. Agency GOHS Amount $200,000 60 Motorcycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan OCCUPANT PROTECTION PROGRAM GOAL: TO IMPROVE THE USAGE OF SEATBELTS AND CHILD SAFETY SEATS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF FATALITIES AND INJURIES AS A RESULT OF VEHICULAR COLLISIONS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS accomplishes its goal of improving seatbelt and child safety seat usage through strong cohesive statewide enforcement campaigns with a united effort of “Buckle Up Arizona…No Excuses!” Although currently a secondary seatbelt violation state, Arizona law enforcement agencies implement a zero-tolerance policy when encountering a non-usage of seatbelts in correlation with a stop for a traffic violation. Occupant protection enforcement has a consistent built-in component in all aspects of funded traffic projects. Enforcement is supported by extensive education and public awareness activities. GOHS partners with public and private sectors to promote activities to enhance occupant protection. These include, but are not limited to, seatbelt and child safety seat classes, inspections and associated events. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Arizona actively participates in the national Click it or Ticket (“CIOT”) and “Child Passenger Safety” campaigns and related events. Funding is provided to top performing agencies for enforcement during these periods. GOHS strongly supports and funds projects directed toward enforcing Arizona’s occupant protection laws. EDUCATION GOHS continues to facilitate and develop the Children are Priceless Passengers (“CAPP”) program throughout the state. The program, although open to the general public, is directed towards violators of the child passenger safety laws. The CAPP program provides an opportunity for education on the proper installation and use of child safety seats. CAPP is currently at 15 locations and will be expanding to the Navajo Nation in FFY 2011. GOHS additionally funds and sponsors three child safety seat certification classes in three geographic areas across the state in proximity to individuals wanting to become certified technicians. 61 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 - OCCUPANT PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT AND EDUCATION Project Summary: This task will support funding personnel services (overtime) and associated employee related expenses for law enforcement agencies to conduct enforcement of Arizona seatbelt and child safety seat laws. Funding will additionally be provided to fire departments to conduct child safety seat clinics within their jurisdiction. Agency Phoenix FD Chandler PD Tempe PD Chandler FD Pima CSO Pima PD Casa Grande PD Pima CCCD DPS Parker PD Mesa Police Department Total Amount $76,791 $30,000 $26,075 $14,276 $ 6,950 $ 3,331 $ 3,208 $ 2,430 $ 610 $ 502 $164,173 TASK 2 – CHILD SAFETY SEATS Project Summary: In addition to providing child safety seats through the CAPP program, GOHS provides funding to agencies to distribute child safety seats throughout their individual communities. The distribution of these seats is in combination with education to parents and guardians on proper installation of child safety seats. Agency Tucson Medical Center Safe Kids Tucson Cochise Health Network Coconino CHD Chandler FD Pima CHD Nogales PD Verde Valley FD Pima CSO Casa Grande PD Parker PD Total Amount $ 20,000 $ 13,000 $ 9,077 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $67,577 62 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 3 – OCCUPANT PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task provides funding to purchase a tent canopy for child safety seat inspections and education events. Pima Community College $ 300 TASK 4 – OCCUPANT PROTECTION PUBLIC EDUCATION & INFORMATION, MATERIALS & SUPPLIES, PROFESSIONAL & OUTSIDE SERVICES AND TRAVEL Project Summary: This task provides funding to agencies to develop, print and distribute occupant protection public information materials and supplies. Specific funding will be devoted to the Phoenix Police Department’s “Buckle Up Baby” program. Additional funding will be provided for in-state travel for child safety seat training. This task also provides funding for occupant protection/child safety seat education overtime and employee related expenses. Funding will additionally support GOHS’ “Highway Safety Days” at the Arizona State Fair to provide the public information and education about Arizona occupant protection laws and general traffic safety issues. Additionally, this task will support one dedicated storage unit for child safety seats and occupant protection materials. Agency Phoenix PD GOHS – PI&E Tucson PD GOHS – Public Safety Days Coconino CHD GOHS – Storage Unit Total Amount $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,700 10,000 9,713 7,500 1,264 1,164 41,341 TASK 5 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY CHILDREN ARE PRICELESS PASSENGERS PROGRAM Project Summary: The goal of GOHS’ innovative Children Are Priceless Passengers (“CAPP”) program is to improve the child seat usage rate in Arizona by increasing enforcement of child restraint laws by law enforcement agencies, increasing education of drivers about the importance of child safety seats and raising public awareness about the effectiveness of child safety seats. This task provides funding for the purchase of child safety seats and booster seats for distribution throughout the state. Additional funding is provided to certified instructors to provide educational and public safety awareness classes for the CAPP diversion program. GOHS – CAPP Support $ 50,000 63 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY BUCKLE UP ARIZONA…NO EXCUSES!/CLICK IT OR TICKET ENFORCEMENT AND MEDIA Project Summary: In response to the Special Management Review of Arizona’s Occupant Protection program in 2010, GOHS provided funding to 40 agencies to conduct seatbelt enforcement during the national CIOT campaign. This task will provide funding to the top performing law enforcement agencies – based on the 2010 CIOT campaign and the CIOT Next Generation enforcement campaigns. GOHS will determine these agencies in early January 2011. This task will also provide funding for paid media for the FFY 2011 Buckle Up Arizona…It’s the Law!/Click it or Ticket campaign. GOHS – CIOT Enforcement GOHS – CIOT Media $ $ 100,000 30,000 TASK 7 – TRAINING Project Summary: GOHS will hold its annual conference for law enforcement personnel, prosecutors and judges with a curriculum focused on highway and traffic safety issues such as, impaired driving, aggressive driving, speed, occupant protection and school zone enforcement. This task will also provide funding for the 2011 Lifesavers conference to be held in Phoenix. Additional training will be provided by the Transportation Safety Institute for GOHS staff in Occupant Protection Program Management. Agency GOHS Conference Lifesavers TSI Training Total Amount $ 12,500 $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ 34,500 TASK 8 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PAID MEDIA Project Summary: This task will provide funding for the development and distribution of paid media campaigns (electronic, print, radio and broadcast) to promote public awareness of and compliance with Arizona’s occupant protection, seatbelt and child safety seat laws. GOHS – Media $ 20,000 TASK 9 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY ANNUAL SEATBELT SURVEY Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS’ annual seatbelt survey. GOHS – Annual Seatbelt Survey $ 40,000 64 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 10 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Occupant Protection programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS - Personnel Amount $ 52,132 65 Occupant Protection | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FATALITIES AND INJURIES THROUGH ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW This year, GOHS is placing a higher emphasis on school zone and pedestrian safety than prior years. GOHS is funding a number of agencies to conduct specific enforcement details in school zones and pedestrian crossings. This enforcement is combined with greater earned media from GOHS and the respective law enforcement agencies concerning the importance of obeying traffic laws in school zones and in pedestrian walkways. GOHS continues to provide funding for selected agencies to purchase bicycle helmets for distribution within their respective communities. PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT GOHS provides overtime funding for selected agencies with identified problems with speeding through school zones and accidents involving motor vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. With this funding, these agencies participate in “Wolf Pack” enforcement details within their communities to aggressively enforce school zone and pedestrian traffic laws. PUBLIC AWARENESS GOHS provides funding for agencies to purchase bicycle helmets for children to be utilized at public safety fairs and community events. Along with the distribution of helmets, agencies provide the public with important safety information concerning bicycle operation. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CROSSING ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to conduct “Wolf Pack” or other selective traffic enforcement of pedestrian crosswalk and bicycle right of way laws. 66 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Agency Tucson PD Peoria PD Total Amount $ 34,548 $ 10,500 $ 45,048 TASK 2 – SCHOOL ZONE ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME Project Summary: This task provides funding for agencies to conduct school zone and school bus safety enforcement. Agency Pima CSO Peoria PD Casa Grande PD Total Amount $ 19,460 $ 6,000 $ 3,208 $ 28,668 TASK 3 – BICYCLE HELMETS, PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION MATERIALS Project Summary: This task will support the purchase of bicycle helmets and other materials (including the development of print and electronic media) for bicycle and pedestrian safety for events throughout the state. Agency GOHS Peoria PD Total Amount $ 15,000 $ 3,500 $ 18,500 TASK 4 - GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage 402 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety programs. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS - Personnel Amount $ 14,161 67 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan POLICE TRAFFIC SERVICES PROGRAM GOAL: TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF TRAFFIC FATALITIES ON ARIZONA ROADWAYS AND HIGHWAYS RESULTING FROM SPEEDING, AGGRESSIVE DRIVING, RED LIGHT RUNNING AND OTHER FORMS OF RISKY DRIVING BEHAVIOR. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Speed is the number one contributor in fatal traffic accidents in Arizona. According to FARS, in 2008 there were 373 speed related fatalities (a 17.48% decrease from 2007), constituting 39.81% of all traffic fatalities. Impaired driving and speeding continue to be the leading causes of traffic fatalities in Arizona. Speed related fatalities have decreased since peaking at 584 in 2006 as a result of fewer vehicle miles traveled and stronger enforcement of Arizona traffic laws. Law enforcement officers are aided with strong statutes governing speeding and aggressive driving. Arizona has a “Double Fine” program to reduce persistent speeding and aggressive driving violations by having the ability to suspend an individual’s drivers license when 8 or more points are accumulated within a 12 month period. The “Double Fine” program is extended to speeding in excess of the posted speed limit in construction zones when workers are present. Two Fully Equipped Police Package Motorcycles Purchased by the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Police Department with Fiscal Year 2010 GOHS Grant Funds Arizona aggressively prosecutes and adjudicates drivers who run red lights. GOHS has successfully funded programs with the City of Phoenix Police Department in an effort to crack down on red light drivers within Arizona’s largest city. In addition to providing overtime for Selective Traffic Enforcement (“STEP”), GOHS funds laser and radar guns, speed trailers and aggressive driving vehicles for a number of law enforcement agencies. 68 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan PERFORMANCE PLAN ENFORCEMENT Funding is given to agencies with a proven track record of aggressively enforcing Arizona traffic laws. Particular attention is given to agencies with a high number of fatalities resulting from speeding or aggressive driving. GOHS looks to fund agencies implementing unique speed management and aggressive driving enforcement programs. GOHS will continue to fund equipment – such as radar and laser guns – to law enforcement officers to more effectively enforce traffic laws. GOHS will increase the amount of sustained enforcement of speed and aggressive driver laws through overtime funding. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS Project Summary: Selective Traffic Enforcement Programs (“STEP”) are sustained traffic enforcement campaigns conducted by law enforcement agencies throughout the year. Participating law enforcement agencies will enforce speed, aggressive driving, red light running and DUI laws. This task will fund related overtime and employee related expenses. Agency Tucson PD Phoenix PD Tucson PD Gilbert PD Tempe PD Maricopa CSO Cochise CSO Nogales PD Pinetop-Lakeside PD La Paz CSO Mohave CSO ASU PD Peoria PD Cottonwood PD Prescott PD Prescott Valley PD Yavapai CSO $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 57,579 39,000 36,851 27,500 26,075 23,521 23,400 17,959 15,600 12,500 11,295 11,020 10,000 9,600 9,450 9,450 7,834 69 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Chino Valley PD Salt River PD Pima CSO Pinal CSO Eagar PD Holbrook PD Maricopa PD Springerville PD St Johns PD Greenlee CSO Pima PD Casa Grande PD San Luis PD White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Quartzsite PD Sahuarita PD Williams PD Safford PD Snowflake Taylor PD Parker PD Douglas PD Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,038 7,020 6,950 6,760 5,613 4,800 4,243 4,200 4,050 4,000 3,331 3,208 2,700 2,580 2,430 2,354 2,025 1,620 1,350 972 705 426,583 TASK 2 – EQUIPMENT Project Summary: This task will fund equipment, such as police package motorcycles, speed trailers, LASER and Radar guns, aggressive driving cars and tint meters to aide in the enforcement of Arizona traffic laws. Agency Mesa Police Department Pima CSO Flagstaff PD Surprise PD Oro Valley PD Yuma CSO Coconino CSO Tempe PD Tolleson PD Maricopa CSO U of A PD Phoenix PD Prescott Valley PD Tucson PD Show Low PD Amount $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 73,867 60,467 50,000 29,500 29,500 24,455 22,795 20,250 16,093 14,966 13,100 13,040 13,020 11,600 70 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Lake Havasu City PD Williams PD Chino Valley PD Gilbert PD Chandler PD Marana PD Chandler PD Douglas PD Sierra Vista PD Tucson PD El Mirage PD Mohave CSO Payson PD Snowflake Taylor PD Peoria PD Pinetop-Lakeside PD Tempe PD AZ Capital PD St Johns PD Prescott PD Yavapai CSO Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,731 9,000 8,800 8,612 8,329 8,250 8,195 8,092 5,860 5,700 5,602 5,500 5,200 5,000 4,641 4,000 3,545 2,950 2,500 2,400 390 614,950 TASK 3 – EDUCATION Project Summary: This task will support an innovative project to educate high school students about safe, responsible driving. Funding will be provided to develop curriculum material to expand the existing “Stay Alive Arizona” program across the state. The goal of the program is to raise awareness among our young teen drivers to the dangers and consequences involved in risky driving behaviors. Agency Stay Alive Arizona $ Amount 15,750 TASK 4 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY SPEED SURVEY Project Summary: GOHS will conduct an annual survey on alcohol, occupant protection and speeding behavior and perceptions about enforcement and media. Agency GOHS Amount $ 7,000 71 Police Traffic Services | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 5 – TRAINING Project Summary: GOHS will hold its annual conference for law enforcement personnel, prosecutors and judges with a curriculum focused on highway and traffic safety issues such as, impaired driving, aggressive driving, speed, occupant protection and school zone enforcement. This task will also provide funding for the 2011 Lifesavers conference to be held in Phoenix. Agency GOHS Conference Lifesavers Total Amount $ 12,500 $ 11,000 $ 23,500 TASK 6 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 Police Traffic Services program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Agency GOHS - Personnel Amount $ 175,300 Aggressive Driver Vehicle Purchased by the Buckeye Police Department with Fiscal Year 2010 GOHS Funds 72 | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM GOAL: TO DEVELOP EFFECTIVE SAFETY MESSAGES AND OUTREACH STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE SAFETY FOR ALL USERS OF ARIZONA ROADWAYS AND HIGHWAYS. PROGRAM OVERVIEW GOHS funds roadway safety programs to create public awareness campaigns to promote safety with all users of Arizona roadways and highways. PERFORMANCE PLAN Public awareness campaigns will be created with the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation and the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department. The focus of the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation will be to continue the successful Share the Road campaign, educating the general public and truckers about truck safety. The City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department will continue to produce public awareness materials and supplies to promote general road and traffic safety within Arizona’s largest city. TASKS SECTION 402 TASK 1 – ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION Project Summary: This task will fund personnel services to the Arizona Transportation Education Foundation for the Share the Road campaign. Agency Arizona Transportation Education Foundation Amount $ 23,750 TASK 2 – CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Project Summary: This task will fund the development of public information and education materials and supplies to promote general road and traffic safety within the City of Phoenix. Agency City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department Amount $ 31,000 73 Roadway Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 3 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Project Summary: GOHS personnel will administer and manage the 402 roadway safety program. Functions include writing, managing and monitoring grants and contracts. GOHS personnel coordinate the activities and tasks outlined in the Highway Safety Plan and provide status reports and updates on project activity to the GOHS Director and other parties as required. GOHS personnel monitor project activity, prepare and maintain project documentation and evaluate task accomplishments for their grant portfolio. Funding will support personnel services, employee related expenses, and other operating expenses for GOHS grant manager and grant project coordinators. Agency GOHS Amount $5,000 74 Roadway Safety | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TRAFFIC RECORDS PROGRAM GOAL: TO ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF STATISTICAL DATA RELATED TO TRAFFIC SAFETY. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division (“MVD”) collects, manages and analyzes Arizona traffic record data for GOHS. With funding from GOHS, MVD and the Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (“TRCC”) maintain the database for accident crash fatalities and injuries. In the last year, Arizona has made tremendous improvements with processing traffic data, including the redesign of the Crash Report Form and the implementation of AZ TraCS software for data collection. In FFY 10, the Crash Report Form was redesigned utilizing Section 408 funds to eliminate unnecessary reporting data and make the form easier for officers in the field to use. The goal of Arizona’s Traffic Records program is to ensure that GOHS, ADOT and law enforcement has access to accurate and complete data. This data is critical to identifying problem areas that need to be addressed with funding from GOHS. PERFORMANCE PLAN The TRCC, at the direction of MVD and GOHS continue to work on a number of projects to enhance the collection of traffic data in Arizona. In FFY 2011, MVD will focus on reducing the crash data backlog with overtime assistance from GOHS, supporting and developing AZ TraCS, establishing a reporting system for DUI and Seatbelt citations and continuing to integrate the changes made to the Crash Report Form into ADOT software applications. TASKS SECTION 408 TASK 1 – ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Project Summary: This task provides funding to the Arizona Department of Transportation’s Motor Vehicle Division to manage projects relating to the collection, evaluation and analysis of traffic data throughout the State of Arizona. Agency Arizona Department of Transportation – Motor Vehicle Division Amount $ 300,000 75 Traffic Records | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan TASK 2 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY Project Summary: This task provides funding to GOHS to design and implement a data repository for DUI and Seatbelt citations issued under GOHS grants. This data will assist GOHS in identifying problem areas throughout the state and agencies that are successfully implementing countermeasures to solve these problems. Agency GOHS Amount $ 100,000 SECTION 402 TASK 1 – GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY TRAINING Project Summary: This task provides funding for GOHS training for data collection and analysis. Training will be provided by the Transportation Safety Institute and will be for GOHS staff. Agency GOHS Amount $ 10,000 76 Traffic Records | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan PROGRAM COST SUMMARY Agency Name GOHS - P&A Total Fund 402 Planning and Administration Task Local State 1 $ $ 370,000.00 $ $ 370,000.00 Agency Name Salt River Police Department Camp Verde Marshall's Office Yavapai County Sheriff Pima County Sheriff Phoenix Police Department Tempe Police Department Thatcher Police Department Tempe Police Department Glendale Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff Salt River Police Department GOHS - Program Administration Total Accident Investigation Fund Task Local 402 1 $ 32,000.00 402 1 $ 12,000.00 402 1 $ 12,000.00 402 1 $ 7,000.00 402 1 $ 5,000.00 402 1 $ 2,550.00 402 1 $ 2,400.00 402 2 $ 10,230.00 402 2 $ 6,300.00 402 2 $ 2,480.00 402 2 $ 2,395.00 402 3 $ $ 94,355.00 Total $ 370,000.00 $ 370,000.00 State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 18,865.00 $ 18,865.00 Total $ 32,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 10,230.00 $ 6,300.00 $ 2,480.00 $ 2,395.00 $ 18,865.00 $ 113,220.00 77 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Alcohol and Other Drugs Agency Name Fund Task Local ASU Police Department 402 1 $ Avondale Police Department 402 1 $ 22,950.00 AZ State Capital Police Deparment 402 1 $ Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 402 1 $ Benson Police Department 402 1 $ 3,000.00 Buckeye Police Department 402 1 $ 20,000.00 Casa Grande Police Department 402 1 $ 9,625.00 Chino Valley Police Department 402 1 $ 18,492.00 Clarkdale Police Department 402 1 $ 6,780.00 Clifton Police Department 402 1 $ 6,750.00 Cochise County Sheriff 402 1 $ 25,600.00 Cottonwood Police Department 402 1 $ 12,000.00 Douglas Police Department 402 1 $ 16,215.00 Eagar Police Department 402 1 $ 9,959.00 El Mirage Police Department 402 1 $ 8,107.00 Flagstaff Police Department 402 1 $ 15,000.00 Greenlee County Sheriff 402 1 $ 4,000.00 Holbrook Police Department 402 1 $ 3,200.00 Kingman Police Department 402 1 $ 32,623.00 La Paz County Sheriff 402 1 $ 25,000.00 Lake Havasu City Police Department 402 1 $ 16,358.00 Marana Police Department 402 1 $ 30,619.00 Maricopa County Sheriff 402 1 $ 23,521.00 Maricopa Police Department 402 1 $ 25,459.00 Mohave County Sheriff 402 1 $ 12,909.00 Navajo County Sheriff 402 1 $ 20,583.00 Nogales Police Department 402 1 $ 19,849.00 Oro Valley Police Department 402 1 $ 24,310.00 Parker Police Department 402 1 $ 1,297.00 Pascua Yaqui Police Department 402 1 $ 9,660.00 Payson Police Department 402 1 $ 13,500.00 Pima Community College 402 1 $ 20,520.00 Pima Police Department 402 1 $ 7,138.00 Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department 402 1 $ 6,500.00 Prescott Police Department 402 1 $ 24,300.00 Prescott Valley Police Department 402 1 $ 24,300.00 Quartzsite Police Department 402 1 $ 2,970.00 Safford Police Department 402 1 $ 8,505.00 Sahuarita Police Department 402 1 $ 8,108.00 State $ 11,830.00 $ $ 27,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total $ 11,830.00 $ 22,950.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 9,625.00 $ 18,492.00 $ 6,780.00 $ 6,750.00 $ 25,600.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 16,215.00 $ 9,959.00 $ 8,107.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 32,623.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 16,358.00 $ 30,619.00 $ 23,521.00 $ 25,459.00 $ 12,909.00 $ 20,583.00 $ 19,849.00 $ 24,310.00 $ 1,297.00 $ 9,660.00 $ 13,500.00 $ 20,520.00 $ 7,138.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 24,300.00 $ 24,300.00 $ 2,970.00 $ 8,505.00 $ 8,108.00 78 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Salt River Police Department San Luis Police Department Scottsdale Police Department Show Low Police Department Sierra Vista Police Department Snowflake Taylor Police Department Springerville Police Department St. John's Police Department Surprise Police Department Thatcher Police Department Tolleson Police Department University of Arizona Police Department White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Williams Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff GOHS - School Outreach MADD MADD SADD GOHS - DRE Conference GOHS Conference GOHS - Lifesavers Phoenix Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff Mesa Police Department Arizona Department of Public Safety Pima County Sheriff Phoenix Police Department Arizona State University Police Department Cochise County Sheriff Yavapai County Sheriff El Mirage Police Department Chandler Police Department Phoenix Police Department Bullhead City Police Department AZ State Capital Police Deparment Glendale Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Surprise Police Department Tempe Police Department Payson Police Department 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 49,680.00 2,700.00 43,192.00 10,800.00 20,250.00 4,725.00 4,200.00 6,750.00 20,050.00 5,400.00 16,200.00 7,740.00 2,025.00 33,946.00 35,100.00 27,850.00 42,400.00 4,000.00 23,500.00 19,000.00 12,500.00 10,000.00 7,350.00 5,852.00 5,200.00 5,000.00 4,500.00 3,330.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,324.00 2,220.00 2,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,644.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 50,000.00 12,000.00 13,380.00 8,776.00 3,234.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 49,680.00 2,700.00 43,192.00 10,800.00 20,250.00 4,725.00 4,200.00 6,750.00 20,050.00 5,400.00 16,200.00 5,644.00 7,740.00 2,025.00 33,946.00 15,000.00 35,100.00 27,850.00 42,400.00 15,000.00 50,000.00 12,000.00 4,000.00 23,500.00 19,000.00 13,380.00 12,500.00 10,000.00 8,776.00 7,350.00 5,852.00 5,200.00 5,000.00 4,500.00 3,330.00 3,234.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,324.00 2,220.00 2,000.00 79 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Prescott Police Department Mohave County Sheriff Lake Havasu City Police Department Sierra Vista Police Department Parker Police Department Benson Police Department Clarkdale Police Department Peoria Police Department Pima Community College Springerville Police Department St. John's Police Department Thatcher Police Department White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Tucson Police Department Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control Pascua Yaqui Police Department Glendale Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff Maricopa County Sheriff Safford Police Department Peoria Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Arizona State University Police Department Pinal County Sheriff Clarkdale Police Department GOHS - Program Administration GOHS - Alcohol Survey GOHS - PI&E GOHS - Public Safety Days GOHS - Storage Unit Arizona Department of Public Safety Pima County Sheriff Tucson Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff Phoenix Police Department Gilbert Police Department Mesa Police Department Chandler Police Department Tempe Police Department Glendale Police Department Phoenix Police Department 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 8 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000.00 1,674.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 2,950.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 500.00 200.00 187.00 180.00 120.00 75.00 133,440.00 118,449.00 117,603.00 104,000.00 99,084.00 88,324.00 69,866.00 58,446.00 55,814.00 52,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000.00 177.00 179,929.00 7,000.00 10,000.00 7,500.00 1,164.00 270,000.00 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000.00 1,674.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 5,000.00 2,950.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 500.00 200.00 187.00 180.00 177.00 120.00 75.00 179,929.00 7,000.00 10,000.00 7,500.00 1,164.00 270,000.00 133,440.00 118,449.00 117,603.00 104,000.00 99,084.00 88,324.00 69,866.00 58,446.00 55,814.00 52,000.00 80 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Goodyear Police Department Pinal County Sheriff Peoria Police Department City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office GOHS - DRE Support GOHS - SFST Support GOHS - Phlebotomy Support GOHS - Paid Media GOHS - Program Administration Total 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 Agency Name Arizona Department of Transportation GOHS - DUI/Seatbelt Data GOHS - Data Training Total Agency Name Sedona Fire Department Pinewood Fire District Flagstaff Fire Department Sun Lakes Fire Department Pinewood Fire District GOHS - Program Administration Total Agency Name GOHS - Survey GOHS - Paid Media Total 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 5 $ 50,891.00 $ 47,840.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 206,407.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,250,441.00 Traffic Records Fund Task Local 408 1 $ 408 2 $ 402 1 $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ 75,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 138,759.00 $ 1,146,893.00 State $ 300,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 410,000.00 Emergency Medical Services Fund Task Local State 402 1 $ 26,182.00 $ 402 1 $ 20,293.00 $ 402 1 $ 9,041.00 $ 402 1 $ 2,866.00 $ 402 2 $ 1,608.00 $ 402 3 $ $ 9,625.00 $ 59,990.00 $ 9,625.00 Fund 402 2010 Task 1 1 Motorcycle Safety Local $ $ $ - State $ 10,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 50,891.00 $ 47,840.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 206,407.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 138,759.00 $ 3,397,334.00 Total $ 300,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 410,000.00 Total $ 26,182.00 $ 20,293.00 $ 9,041.00 $ 2,866.00 $ 1,608.00 $ 9,625.00 $ 69,615.00 Total $ 10,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 210,000.00 81 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Agency Name Phoenix Fire Department Chandler Police Department Tempe Police Department Chandler Fire Department Pima County Sheriff Pima Police Department Casa Grande Police Department Pima Community College Parker Police Department Mesa Police Department Tucson Medical Center Safe Kids Tucson Cochise Health Network Coconino County Health Department Chandler Fire Department Pima County Health Department Nogales Police Department Verde Valley Fire Department Pima County Sheriff Casa Grande Police Department Parker Police Department Pima Community College Phoenix Police Department GOHS - PI&E Tucson Police Department GOHS - Public Safety Days Coconino County Health Department GOHS - Storage Unit GOHS - CAPP Support GOHS - CIOT Enforcement GOHS - CIOT Media GOHS Conference GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - TSI Training GOHS - OP Media GOHS - Seatbelt Survey GOHS - Program Administration Total Occupant Protection Fund Task Local 402 1 $ 76,791.00 402 1 $ 30,000.00 402 1 $ 26,075.00 402 1 $ 14,276.00 402 1 $ 6,950.00 402 1 $ 3,331.00 402 1 $ 3,208.00 402 1 $ 2,430.00 402 1 $ 610.00 402 1 $ 502.00 402 2 $ 20,000.00 402 2 $ 13,000.00 402 2 $ 9,077.00 402 2 $ 5,000.00 402 2 $ 5,000.00 402 2 $ 4,000.00 402 2 $ 4,000.00 402 2 $ 2,500.00 402 2 $ 2,500.00 402 2 $ 2,500.00 402 3 $ 300.00 402 4 $ 11,700.00 402 4 $ 402 4 $ 9,713.00 402 4 $ 402 4 $ 1,264.00 402 4 $ 402 5 $ 402 6 $ 402 6 $ 402 7 $ 402 7 $ 402 7 $ 402 8 $ 402 9 $ 402 10 $ $ 254,727.00 State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000.00 $ $ 7,500.00 $ $ 1,164.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 52,132.00 $ 345,296.00 Total $ 76,791.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 26,075.00 $ 14,276.00 $ 6,950.00 $ 3,331.00 $ 3,208.00 $ 2,430.00 $ 610.00 $ 502.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 9,077.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 300.00 $ 11,700.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,713.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 1,264.00 $ 1,164.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 52,132.00 $ 600,023.00 82 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Agency Name Tucson Police Department Peoria Police Department Pima County Sheriff Peoria Police Department Casa Grande Police Department GOHS - Bicycle Helmets Peoria Police Department GOHS - Program Administration Total Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Fund Task Local 402 1 $ 34,548.00 402 1 $ 10,500.00 402 2 $ 19,460.00 402 2 $ 6,000.00 402 2 $ 3,208.00 402 3 $ 402 3 $ 3,500.00 402 4 $ $ 77,216.00 Agency Name Arizona Transportation Education Foundation City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department GOHS - Program Administration Total State $ $ $ $ $ $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,161.00 $ 44,161.00 Roadway Safety Fund Task Local 402 1 $ 23,750.00 402 2 $ 31,000.00 402 3 $ $ 54,750.00 Total $ 34,548.00 $ 10,500.00 $ 19,460.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,208.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 14,161.00 $ 121,377.00 State $ $ $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Total $ 23,750.00 $ 31,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 59,750.00 83 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Agency Name Tucson Police Department Phoenix Police Department Tucson Police Department Gilbert Police Department Tempe Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff Cochise County Sheriff Nogales Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department La Paz County Sheriff Mohave County Sheriff Arizona State University Police Department Peoria Police Department Cottonwood Police Department Prescott Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff Chino Valley Police Department Salt River Police Department Pima County Sheriff Pinal County Sheriff Eagar Police Department Holbrook Police Department Maricopa Police Department Springerville Police Department St. John's Police Department Greenlee County Sheriff Pima Police Department Casa Grande Police Department San Luis Police Department White Mountain Tribal Traffic Safety Coalition Quartzsite Police Department Sahuarita Police Department Williams Police Department Safford Police Department Snowflake Taylor Police Department Parker Police Department Douglas Police Department Mesa Police Department Police Traffic Services Fund Task Local 402 1 $ 57,579.00 402 1 $ 39,000.00 402 1 $ 36,851.00 402 1 $ 27,500.00 402 1 $ 26,075.00 402 1 $ 23,521.00 402 1 $ 23,400.00 402 1 $ 17,959.00 402 1 $ 15,600.00 402 1 $ 12,500.00 402 1 $ 11,295.00 402 1 $ 402 1 $ 10,000.00 402 1 $ 9,600.00 402 1 $ 9,450.00 402 1 $ 9,450.00 402 1 $ 7,834.00 402 1 $ 7,038.00 402 1 $ 7,020.00 402 1 $ 6,950.00 402 1 $ 6,760.00 402 1 $ 5,613.00 402 1 $ 4,800.00 402 1 $ 4,243.00 402 1 $ 4,200.00 402 1 $ 4,050.00 402 1 $ 4,000.00 402 1 $ 3,331.00 402 1 $ 3,208.00 402 1 $ 2,700.00 402 1 $ 2,580.00 402 1 $ 2,430.00 402 1 $ 2,354.00 402 1 $ 2,025.00 402 1 $ 1,620.00 402 1 $ 1,350.00 402 1 $ 972.00 402 1 $ 705.00 402 2 $ 100,000.00 State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,020.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Total $ 57,579.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 36,851.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 26,075.00 $ 23,521.00 $ 23,400.00 $ 17,959.00 $ 15,600.00 $ 12,500.00 $ 11,295.00 $ 11,020.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 9,450.00 $ 9,450.00 $ 7,834.00 $ 7,038.00 $ 7,020.00 $ 6,950.00 $ 6,760.00 $ 5,613.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,243.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,050.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,331.00 $ 3,208.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 2,430.00 $ 2,354.00 $ 2,025.00 $ 1,620.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 972.00 $ 705.00 $ 100,000.00 84 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Pima County Sheriff Flagstaff Police Department Surprise Police Department Oro Valley Police Department Yuma County Sheriff Coconino County Sheriff Tempe Police Department Tolleson Police Department Maricopa County Sheriff University of Arizona Police Department Phoenix Police Department Prescott Valley Police Department Tucson Police Department Show Low Police Department Lake Havasu City Police Department Williams Police Department Chino Valley Police Department Gilbert Police Department Chandler Police Department Marana Police Department Chandler Police Department Douglas Police Department Sierra Vista Police Department Tucson Police Department El Mirage Police Department Mohave County Sheriff Payson Police Department Snowflake Taylor Police Department Peoria Police Department Pinetop-Lakeside Police Department Tempe Police Department AZ State Capital Police Deparment St. John's Police Department Prescott Police Department Yavapai County Sheriff Stay Alive Arizona GOHS - Survey GOHS Conference GOHS - Lifesavers GOHS - Program Administration Total 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 402 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 $ 73,867.00 $ 60,467.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 24,455.00 $ 22,795.00 $ 20,250.00 $ 16,093.00 $ $ 13,100.00 $ 13,040.00 $ 13,020.00 $ 11,600.00 $ 9,731.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 8,612.00 $ 8,329.00 $ 8,250.00 $ 8,195.00 $ 8,092.00 $ 5,860.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 5,602.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 4,641.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,545.00 $ $ 2,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 390.00 $ 15,750.00 $ $ $ $ $ 1,028,347.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 14,966.00 2,950.00 7,000.00 12,500.00 11,000.00 175,300.00 234,736.00 $ 73,867.00 $ 60,467.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 24,455.00 $ 22,795.00 $ 20,250.00 $ 16,093.00 $ 14,966.00 $ 13,100.00 $ 13,040.00 $ 13,020.00 $ 11,600.00 $ 9,731.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 8,612.00 $ 8,329.00 $ 8,250.00 $ 8,195.00 $ 8,092.00 $ 5,860.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 5,602.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 4,641.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,545.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 390.00 $ 15,750.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 12,500.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 175,300.00 $ 1,263,083.00 85 Program Cost Summary | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan EQUIPMENT The following list identifies equipment in excess of $5,000.00 to be purchased utilizing Section 402 funds. Agency Mesa Police Department Flagstaff Police Department Surprise Police Department Salt River Police Department Oro Valley Police Department Yuma County Sheriff Pima County Sheriff Pinewood Fire District Mesa Police Department Tolleson Police Department Sedona Fire Department Camp Verde Marshall's Office Yavapai County Sheriff Prescott Valley Police Department Williams Police Department Gilbert Police Department ASU Police Department Pima County Sheriff Coconino County Sheriff Tolleson Police Department Program Area PT PT PT AI PT PT PT EM AL PT EM AI AI PT PT PT AL AI PT PT Task 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 Equipment 4 Police Package Motorcycles ($25,000 each) 2 Police Package Motorcycles ($30,233.70 each) 1 Police Package Aggressive Driving Vehicle AIMS Crash Mapping & CDR Software 1 Police Package Motorcycle 1 Police Package Motorcycle 1 Police Package Motorcycle 2 Hurst Tools Jaws of Life ($10,000 each) DUI Van Upgrades - Floor $5500; Generator $13,500 Traffic Message Board 24"x24" air bag - $7,320; 42" Rescue Struts - $6,295 Nikkon Total Station Kit Nikkon Total Station Kit Speed Trailer Speed Trailer Speed Trailer Intoxilyzer 8000 Crash Data Recorder Upgrade Server for Video Camera Recording Storage Speed Feedback Sign Total 86 Equipment | Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Fiscal Year 2011 Highway Safety Plan Amount $ 100,000.00 $ 60,467.40 $ 50,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 15,250.00 $ 13,615.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 9,750.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 8,611.68 $ 7,276.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 463,470.08 Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Alberto C. Gutier, Director Governor’s Highway Safety Representative 3030 North Central Avenue, Suite 1550 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 602-255-3216 www.azgohs.gov