MARICOPA COUNTY STADIUM FLOOD CONTROL LIBRARY & OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADOPTED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2016‐2017 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Staffing Variance Analysis General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Sources and Uses by Project Strategic Business Planning (SBP) for All Projects Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Flood Control District Floodprone Property Acquisition Program i 1 3 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 12 13 14 14 14 15 25 25 26 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 30 33 33 34 34 35 36 37 46 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Library District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Staffing Variance Analysis General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 49 51 53 54 54 55 56 57 57 58 59 60 60 61 61 61 62 63 65 65 66 67 67 68 68 68 68 69 71 Stadium District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities ii 75 77 79 80 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 86 87 87 87 87 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service 90 90 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 93 98 Improvement Districts Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies 101 102 103 iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion Adopt the Flood Control District Fiscal Year 2017 Budget in the amount of $109,947,047 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Flood Control District. This amount represents no increase from the FY 2017 Tentative Budget of $109,947,047. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Clint Hickman, Chairman, District 4 Denny Barney, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The FY 2017 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $109,947,047, an increase of $8,847,880 over the FY 2016 Revised Budget. Capital project expenditures are budgeted at $77,446,654. This is an increase of $9,446,654 from FY 2016 and is supported by a partnership with the Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS to rehabilitate four major dam structures over the next five years. Commercial and residential property values have increased from FY 2016. The FY 2017 budget has been developed with an increased tax rate of $0.1792 per $100 dollars of net assessed value. This has increased the Flood Control District Levy to $58,463,580 for FY 2017, an increase of $8,951,444 from FY 2016. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals $38,733,500 for cost sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2017, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $97,456,842, which is $12,892,814 (15.2%) more than FY 2016. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2015 through FY 2017 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 FY 2015 Actuals FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. In all, the Flood Control District has 52 scheduled projects totaling $260 million in the five-year Capital Improvement Program. This includes $6.8 million in the Small Projects Assistance Program and $960,000 in the Floodprone Property Assistance Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Joy Rich Maricopa County Manager 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District On June 20, 2016, the Maricopa County Flood Control District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2017 Budget totaling $109,947,047. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 15, 2016, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2017 Tax Levy and Rate. Casandro Wash Guadalupe Flood Retarding Structure 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst and Carmine L. Davis, Management and Budget Supervisor Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) is to provide regional flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation an education to Maricopa County residents so they can reduce the risk of injury, death, and property damage from flooding, while still enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The Flood Control District vision is for the residents of Maricopa County and future generations to have the maximum level of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multi-use facilities that complement and enhance the beauty of our desert environment. Strategic Goals Department Specific By 2022, the District will evaluate all new structures and 50% of the 83 existing District structures for potential water conservation measures and implement such water conservation measures on at least 5 of the new or existing structures. Status: This is a new goal for FY 2017 and as a result, there is no information to report at this time. Government Operations By 2022, the District will achieve a 50% reduction in water usage on FCD landscaping from 7,500,000 gallons of water in 2014, thus reducing the overall water usage. Status: This is a new goal for FY 2017 and as a result, there is no information to report at this time. Regional Services By 2022, The District will have reduced the risk of loss of life or property due to storm water flooding for 94% of the 2030 projected population of the County, an increase from 84% of the projected population. (Risk reduction is measured based on structures, regulation and information that comes out of studies.) Status: This is a new goal for FY 2017 and as a result, there is no information to report at this time. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 6,349,421 CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 18,246,085 SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 57,762,017 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 184,600 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 202,096 INTEREST EARNINGS 65,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 504,629 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 58,718,342 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 40,938,500 25,408,677 5,000 $ 66,347,177 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 58,723,342 $ 66,347,177 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 16,028,642 $ SUPPLIES 1,647,530 SERVICES 13,464,125 CAPITAL 1,355,096 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 32,495,393 $ 24,595,506 TOTAL $ - $ 24,595,506 57,762,017 $ 184,600 202,096 65,000 504,629 58,718,342 $ - $ $ 57,762,017 184,600 202,096 65,000 504,629 58,718,342 5,000 $ - $ 40,938,500 25,408,677 (25,408,677) 66,352,177 $ (25,408,677) $ 5,000 40,938,500 40,943,500 $ 125,070,519 $ (25,408,677) $ 16,028,642 $ 1,647,530 13,464,125 1,355,096 32,495,393 $ - $ 99,661,842 $ 16,028,642 1,647,530 13,464,125 1,355,096 32,495,393 NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ - $ 1,798,000 $ 1,798,000 $ - $ SERVICES 5,000 5,000 CAPITAL 75,648,654 75,648,654 OTHER FINANCING USES 25,408,677 25,408,677 (25,408,677) TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 25,413,677 $ 77,446,654 $ 102,860,331 $ (25,408,677) $ 1,798,000 5,000 75,648,654 77,451,654 TOTAL USES $ 57,909,070 - $ - $ ELIMINATIONS $ 77,446,654 $ 135,355,724 $ (25,408,677) $ 109,947,047 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 26,222,949 $ - $ 26,222,949 $ - $ 26,222,949 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ $ 7,146,608 $ 14,310,301 $ - $ 14,310,301 7,163,693 6 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2016 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CONTROL CIP FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ $ $ $ $ 32,495,393 34,195,616 66,691,009 FY 2016 REVISED $ 32,495,393 34,195,616 66,691,009 345,000 $ 603,774 3,050,000 64,950,000 68,000,000 $ $ $ FY 2017 RECOMM FY 2017 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 32,495,393 25,408,677 $ 57,904,070 $ 32,495,393 $ 25,408,677 $ 57,904,070 $ $ $ 5,000 5,000 8,786,939 8,786,939 $ 598,774 3,050,000 $ 1,782,250 $ 1,782,250 $ 1,267,750 300,000 320,000 320,000 (20,000) 64,650,000 75,344,404 75,344,404 (10,694,404) 68,000,000 $ 77,446,654 $ 77,446,654 $ (9,446,654) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) $ (8,786,939) $ 100,840,393 7 $ 101,099,167 $ 109,947,047 $109,947,047 $ (8,847,880) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $109,947,047 Fund Balance $10,285,205 9% Intergovernmental & Grants $41,145,596 37% Property Taxes & PILT $57,762,017 53% Miscellaneous & Interest $569,629 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $184,600 0% Uses of Funds $109,947,047 Administrative Services $7,783,294 7% Flood Hazard Identification $6,793,448 6% Information Technology $2,612,171 3% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,497,601 2% Flood Hazard Regulation $1,314,926 1% Flood Hazard Remediation $88,945,607 81% 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2015 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES $ FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ 8,619 $ 172,671 181,290 $ - $ 134,600 134,600 $ - $ 134,600 134,600 $ - $ 150,762 150,762 $ 3,000 $ 154,600 157,600 $ 3,000 20,000 23,000 N/A 14.9% 17.1% FWRN - FLOOD WARNING 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ $ 100 $ 100 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,100 $ 7,100 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ - 0.0% 0.0% PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ 273,709 $ 273,709 $ 345,000 $ 345,000 $ 468,774 $ 468,774 $ 521,291 $ 521,291 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ 7,131,014 $ 2,528 7,133,542 $ 34,453,000 $ 34,453,000 $ 34,453,000 $ 34,453,000 $ 25,751,542 $ 4,195 25,755,737 $ 40,938,500 $ 25,000 40,963,500 $ - $ 135,477 161,135 296,612 $ - $ 135,477 161,135 296,612 $ 17,190 $ 712,110 138,737 868,037 $ - $ 383,629 101,000 484,629 $ $ $ (463,774) (463,774) 6,485,500 25,000 6,510,500 248,152 (60,135) 188,017 -98.9% -98.9% 18.8% N/A 18.9% RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ 25,699 $ 1,211,173 130,626 1,367,498 $ N/A 183.2% -37.3% 63.4% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 43,437,175 $ 43,437,175 $ 49,204,042 $ 49,204,042 $ 49,204,042 $ 49,204,042 $ 49,351,703 $ 49,351,703 $ 58,029,113 $ 58,029,113 $ 8,825,071 8,825,071 17.9% 17.9% GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 475 $ 475 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 15,000 N/A N/A TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 52,393,789 $ 84,440,254 $ 84,564,028 $ 76,654,630 $ 99,661,842 $ 15,097,814 17.9% 278,043 $ 1,002,551 1,280,594 $ 337,847 $ 945,439 1,283,286 $ 301,690 $ 956,164 1,257,854 $ 245,195 $ 979,733 1,224,928 $ 343,198 $ 971,728 1,314,926 $ (41,508) (15,564) (57,072) -13.8% -1.6% -4.5% 16,729 $ 541,516 1,282,930 412,752 2,253,927 $ 104,164 $ 651,990 1,253,213 310,346 2,319,713 $ 60,438 $ 619,313 1,249,054 337,873 2,266,678 $ 34,901 $ 556,969 1,176,211 292,290 2,060,371 $ 67,032 $ 864,116 1,222,157 344,296 2,497,601 $ (6,594) (244,803) 26,897 (6,423) (230,923) -10.9% -39.5% 2.2% -1.9% -10.2% 1,747,236 $ 4,180,412 5,927,648 $ 2,225,587 $ 5,482,226 7,707,813 $ 2,163,170 $ 5,736,405 7,899,575 $ 1,921,567 $ 5,375,733 7,297,300 $ 1,983,553 $ 4,809,895 6,793,448 $ 179,617 926,510 1,106,127 8.3% 16.2% 14.0% 32,162,464 $ 9,544,725 41,707,189 $ 68,967,794 $ 11,564,635 80,532,429 $ 69,116,660 $ 11,565,093 80,681,753 $ 55,762,662 $ 10,926,100 66,688,762 $ 78,629,673 $ 10,315,934 88,945,607 $ (9,513,013) 1,249,159 (8,263,854) -13.8% 10.8% -10.2% 456,728 $ 505,630 92,736 1,156,579 223,647 104,990 100,634 5,530 680,779 516,267 3,843,520 $ 523,569 $ 530,404 114,797 1,114,224 184,522 306,199 121,528 102,831 17,295 687,351 741,800 4,444,520 $ 443,971 $ 530,404 114,797 1,233,976 184,522 267,897 121,528 102,831 17,295 687,351 741,800 4,446,372 $ 527,496 $ 536,586 46,183 1,216,879 184,522 237,422 114,100 221,888 15,815 647,266 648,582 4,396,739 $ 535,076 $ 794,526 83,652 1,232,634 259,242 264,436 118,583 133,298 16,720 1,675,857 760,745 5,874,769 $ (91,105) (264,122) 31,145 1,342 (74,720) 3,461 2,945 (30,467) 575 (988,506) (18,945) (1,428,397) -20.5% -49.8% 27.1% 0.1% -40.5% 1.3% 2.4% -29.6% 3.3% -143.8% -2.6% -32.1% 1,730,641 $ 229,196 172,164 2,132,001 $ 1,667,648 $ 237,663 226,928 2,132,239 $ 1,667,648 $ 237,663 226,928 2,132,239 $ 1,667,648 $ 239,517 227,543 2,134,708 $ 1,340,900 $ 325,444 242,181 1,908,525 $ 326,748 (87,781) (15,253) 223,714 19.6% -36.9% -6.7% 10.5% $ 810,545 $ 875,865 269,556 1,955,966 $ 936,968 $ 1,143,077 340,348 2,420,393 $ 936,968 $ 1,137,380 340,348 2,414,696 $ 1,103,840 $ 1,032,297 417,635 2,553,772 $ 1,064,318 $ 1,257,543 290,310 2,612,171 $ (127,350) (120,163) 50,038 (197,475) -13.6% -10.6% 14.7% -8.2% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 59,100,845 $ 100,840,393 $ 101,099,167 $ 86,356,580 $ 109,947,047 $ (8,847,880) -8.8% USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ $ FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ $ HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT POOL - POOLED COSTS PROC - PROCUREMENT RCOM - REGULATION COMPLIANCE RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 9 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2015 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS 43,056,303 43,056,303 FY 2016 ADOPTED $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 347,390 $ 347,390 $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ FY 2016 REVISED 48,917,990 $ 48,917,990 $ 174,600 174,600 48,917,990 48,917,990 FY 2016 FORECAST $ $ $ $ 174,600 $ 174,600 $ 273,709 $ 7,131,014 152,712 7,557,435 $ 345,000 $ 34,453,000 186,052 34,984,052 $ 468,774 $ 34,453,000 186,052 35,107,826 $ 228,160 $ 1,204,501 1,432,661 $ 100,000 263,612 363,612 $ $ 100,000 $ 263,612 363,612 $ 49,022,804 49,022,804 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ $ 57,762,017 57,762,017 $ $ 8,844,027 8,844,027 18.1% 18.1% 215,569 $ 215,569 $ 184,600 184,600 $ $ 10,000 10,000 5.7% 5.7% 521,291 25,751,542 186,618 26,459,451 $ $ 5,000 $ 40,938,500 202,096 41,145,596 $ (463,774) 6,485,500 16,044 6,037,770 -98.9% 18.8% 8.6% 17.2% 142,281 $ 814,525 956,806 $ 65,000 $ 504,629 569,629 $ (35,000) 241,017 206,017 -35.0% 91.4% 56.7% ALL REVENUES $ 52,393,789 $ 84,440,254 $ 84,564,028 $ 76,654,630 $ 99,661,842 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 52,393,789 FY 2015 ACTUAL $ 84,440,254 $ FY 2016 ADOPTED 84,564,028 FY 2016 REVISED $ 76,654,630 FY 2016 FORECAST $ 99,661,842 FY 2017 ADOPTED $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 15,097,814 17.9% 15,097,814 17.9% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 12,269,358 $ 24,333 34,899 4,166,498 50,008 (4,570,609) 4,492,206 16,466,693 $ 11,148,355 $ 50,136 53,300 4,032,207 14,000 (2,001,000) 5,021,803 18,318,801 $ 11,130,432 $ 68,040 53,300 4,032,226 14,000 (2,001,000) 5,021,803 18,318,801 $ 10,615,395 $ 37,998 43,495 3,812,946 10,015 (2,719,773) 5,342,049 17,142,125 $ 9,892,210 $ 43,056 48,600 4,139,232 10,000 (2,448,679) 6,142,223 17,826,642 $ 1,238,222 24,984 4,700 (107,006) 4,000 447,679 (1,120,420) 492,159 11.1% 36.7% 8.8% -2.7% 28.6% 22.4% -22.3% 2.7% 719,958 $ 264,705 252,535 (34,889) 129,372 1,331,681 $ 966,244 $ 378,666 127,400 156,532 1,628,842 $ 966,244 $ 378,666 127,400 156,532 1,628,842 $ 840,129 $ 335,921 389,335 148,017 1,713,402 $ 1,037,630 $ 361,500 111,350 (15,348) 152,398 1,647,530 $ (71,386) 17,166 16,050 15,348 4,134 (18,688) -7.4% 4.5% 12.6% N/A 2.6% -1.1% 288,071 $ 5,684,676 862,284 283,153 2,986,257 33,495 61,979 12,877 653,955 (189,940) 233,595 10,910,402 $ 59,113 $ 8,734,465 485,465 962,985 3,036,638 108,250 67,421 9,300 325,200 331,846 14,120,683 $ 59,113 $ 8,993,239 485,465 962,985 3,036,638 108,250 67,421 9,300 325,200 331,846 14,379,457 $ 204,046 $ 7,904,243 626,976 963,129 2,999,988 49 82,227 52,504 13,735 312,052 (10,772) 361,236 13,509,413 $ 299,550 $ 7,598,402 626,127 1,390,771 2,833,796 75,300 118,550 8,600 325,200 (171,442) 364,271 13,469,125 $ (240,437) 1,394,837 (140,662) (427,786) 202,842 32,950 (51,129) 700 171,442 (32,425) 910,332 -406.7% 15.5% -29.0% -44.4% 6.7% N/A 30.4% -75.8% 7.5% 0.0% N/A -9.8% 6.3% $ 1,858,656 $ 1,104,935 841,633 26,563,239 (14,842) 38,448 30,392,069 $ 235,000 $ 40,000 735,500 65,761,000 567 66,772,067 $ 235,000 $ 40,000 735,500 65,761,000 567 66,772,067 $ 1,030,541 $ 55,143 715,499 52,190,219 238 53,991,640 $ 870,000 $ 376,096 979,000 74,778,654 77,003,750 $ (635,000) (336,096) (243,500) (9,017,654) 567 (10,231,683) -270.2% -840.2% -33.1% -13.7% N/A 100.0% -15.3% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 59,100,845 $ 100,840,393 $ 101,099,167 $ 86,356,580 $ 109,947,047 $ (8,847,880) -8.8% TOTAL USES $ 59,100,845 $ 100,840,393 $ 101,099,167 $ 86,356,580 $ 109,947,047 $ (8,847,880) -8.8% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0910 - LAND 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0955 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION OUT 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 10 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % SOURCES $ 6,027 $ 267,682 273,709 $ - $ 345,000 345,000 $ - $ 468,774 468,774 $ - $ 521,291 521,291 $ - $ 5,000 5,000 $ $ SOURCES $ 44,989,066 $ 44,989,066 $ 49,642,254 $ 49,642,254 $ 49,642,254 $ 49,642,254 $ 50,381,797 $ 50,381,797 $ 58,718,342 $ 58,718,342 $ 9,076,088 9,076,088 18.3% 18.3% $ SOURCES $ 30,000,000 $ 7,131,014 37,131,014 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,453,000 68,648,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,453,000 68,648,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,751,542 59,947,158 $ 25,408,677 $ 40,938,500 66,347,177 $ (8,786,939) 6,485,500 (2,301,439) -25.7% 18.8% -3.4% $ SOURCES $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) $ 8,786,939 8,786,939 -25.7% -25.7% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 44,995,093 $ 7,398,696 $ 52,393,789 $ FY 2015 ACTUAL 49,642,254 $ 34,798,000 $ 84,440,254 $ FY 2016 ADOPTED 49,642,254 $ 34,921,774 $ 84,564,028 $ FY 2016 REVISED 50,381,797 $ 26,272,833 $ 76,654,630 $ FY 2016 FORECAST $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 188,808 $ 188,808 $ 345,000 $ 345,000 $ 603,774 $ 603,774 $ 603,774 $ 603,774 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 598,774 598,774 99.2% 99.2% $ 27,506,348 $ 30,000,000 57,506,348 $ 32,495,393 $ 34,195,616 66,691,009 $ 32,495,393 $ 34,195,616 66,691,009 $ 30,818,499 $ 34,195,616 65,014,115 $ 32,495,393 $ 25,408,677 57,904,070 $ 8,786,939 8,786,939 0.0% 25.7% 13.2% FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FY 2016 ADOPTED (463,774) (463,774) N/A -98.9% -98.9% 58,718,342 $ 9,076,088 18.3% 40,943,500 $ 6,021,726 17.2% 99,661,842 $ 15,097,814 17.9% FY 2017 REVISED VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CONTROL CIP $ FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,372,834 $ 30,032,855 31,405,689 $ 3,050,000 $ 64,950,000 68,000,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 300,000 64,650,000 68,000,000 $ 3,102,743 $ 600,737 51,230,827 54,934,307 $ 1,782,250 $ 320,000 75,344,404 77,446,654 $ 1,267,750 (20,000) (10,694,404) (9,446,654) 41.6% -6.7% -16.5% -13.9% (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) $ (8,786,939) (8,786,939) 25.7% 25.7% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 27,506,348 $ 31,594,497 $ 59,100,845 $ 32,495,393 $ 68,345,000 $ 100,840,393 $ 32,495,393 $ 68,603,774 $ 101,099,167 $ 30,818,499 $ 32,495,393 $ 55,538,081 $ 77,451,654 $ 86,356,580 $ 109,947,047 $ (8,847,880) (8,847,880) 0.0% -12.9% -8.8% Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 Non-Recurring $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 Non-Recurring $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 ELIMINATIONS $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) Non-Recurring $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 11 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 Non-Recurring $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 Non-Recurring $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 $ 25,408,677 ELIMINATIONS $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) Non-Recurring $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (25,408,677) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION FLOOD WARNING PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT REGULATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 14.00 11.00 25.00 15.00 11.00 26.00 14.50 10.00 24.50 14.50 10.00 24.50 13.50 10.00 23.50 (1.00) (1.00) (6.9%) 0.0% (4.1%) 2.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 23.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 9.00 19.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 9.00 18.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 9.00 19.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 9.00 19.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 7.00 4.00 11.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 8.00 4.00 12.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 (1.00) (1.00) (12.5%) 0.0% (8.3%) 15.00 87.00 102.00 17.00 86.50 103.50 19.00 86.50 105.50 17.00 87.00 104.00 16.00 89.00 105.00 (3.00) 2.50 (.50) (15.8%) 2.9% (0.5%) 7.00 3.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 2.00 53.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 27.00 7.00 7.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 .00 2.00 1.00 28.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 27.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 27.00 (1.00) (1.00) 0.0% (14.3%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% (3.6%) 14.00 14.00 228.00 186.50 .00 188.00 185.50 185.50 (2.50) N/A N/A (1.3%) 12 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Administrative Staff Supv Administrative Supervisor Applications Development Mgr Applications Development Supv Atmospheric Science Pro Chemical Applicatns Tech Communications Department Ofcr Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Communicatn Officer Supervisor Construction Maintenance Supv Crew Leader Database Administrator Deputy Director - Flood Control Development Services Supervisor Development Svcs Technician Development Svcs Technician Ld Development Svcs Technician Sr Director - Flood Control District Engineer Engineering Associate Engineering Manager Engineering Specialist Engineering Supervisor Engineering Support Branch Manager Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Executive Assistant Field Operations Supervisor Finance Manager - Large Finance Support Supervisor Finance/Business Analyst General Maintenance Worker GIS Programmer/Analyst GIS Programmer/Analyst - Senior/Lead Heavy Equipment Operator Heavy Equipment Operator - Sr Inspection Supervisor Inspector Instrumentation Tech-Water Management Analyst Management Assistant Mechanic - Automotive Media Specialist Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized Operations Supervisor - PW Operations/Program Manager Planning Supervisor Procurement Officer - Dept Procurement Specialist Procurement Supervisor - Dept Public Works Chief Appraiser Real Property Manager Real Property Specialist Real Property Supervisor Respiratory Technician Software Sys Engineer Special Projects Manager Survey Technician Technical Program Supv Title Examiner Trades Generalist Water Instrument Tech Supv Web Designer/Developer Department Total FY 2015 ADOPTED 2.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 28.00 16.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 14.00 4.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 8.00 2.00 7.00 4.00 2.00 12.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 228.00 FY 2016 ADOPTED 2.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.50 16.00 4.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 2.00 12.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 10.00 1.00 186.50 13 FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.00 31.50 15.00 14.00 5.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 7.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 12.00 12.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 188.00 185.50 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2017 ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 2.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% N/A 3.00 0.0% 1.00 (1.00) (50.0%) 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 31.50 (.50) (1.6%) 14.00 (1.00) (6.7%) 4.00 (1.00) (20.0%) N/A 8.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 7.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 10.00 0.0% N/A N/A 7.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 12.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 3.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 5.00 1.00 25.0% 1.00 (1.00) (50.0%) 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 10.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 185.50 (2.50) (1.3% ) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 991 FLOOD CONTROL Department Total FY 2015 ADOPTED 228.00 228.00 FY 2016 ADOPTED 186.50 186.50 FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 188.00 185.50 188.00 185.50 FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 185.50 (2.50) (1.3%) 185.50 (2.50) (1.3% ) Staffing Variance Analysis The Flood Control District reassessed the needs of the Engineering Division which resulted in the net inactivation of one Developmental Services Technician, one part time Engineer, one Engineer Associate and an Engineering Manager. The District also inactivated one Office Assistant Specialised and created an Office Assistant FTE. These changes were accomplished through regular attrition within the department. The Title Examiner market range title was used since there is no market range title for the Landscape Architect position which was created to manage water conservation and multi-use landscape aesthetic. General Adjustments Base Adjustments: Flood Control Grants Fund (989) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget includes: o $5,000 in Revenue and Expenditure for Gila River Indian Community for Vegetation Management. Flood Control Fund (991) Operating • Increase Revenue by $216,017 for Other Intergovernmental. • Increase Revenue by $8,844,027 for Property Taxes. • Increase Revenue by $16,044 for Payments in Lieu of Taxes. • Increase Regular Benefits by $244,264 for the impact of the changes in health/dental premium rates. • Increase Personnel Benefits Savings by $8,564 for the vacancy factor applied to the impact of the changes in health/dental and retirement rates. • Increase Regular Benefits by $1,126 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase in Services by $326,748 for Central Services Cost Allocation. • Increase in Capital by $395,775 for equipment. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $458 for the impact of the changes in radio charges. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $15,253 for the impact of the changes in risk management charges. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $87,323 for the impact of the changes in the base telecommunication charges. • Increase in Personnel Savings by $1,062,383, from 5.17% to 10.15%. Flood Control Fund (991) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget includes: o $25,408,677 Transfer to the Capital Project Fund. Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget includes: o $40,938,500 in Revenue from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). o $77,446,654 in Total Expenditures for Capital Improvement Projects. 14 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget includes: o $25,408,677 for Transfer to the Capital Project Fund. Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Regulation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Regulation Program is to provide advisory information and enforcement services to the public with property within floodplains so they can avoid causing adverse impacts to surrounding property, and use their property safely and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request FY 2015 ACTUAL 95.5% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 73.3% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% (5.0%) -5.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% (2.0%) -2.0% 95.4% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% (2.0%) -2.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Permitting • Floodplain Regulation Compliance Floodplain Permitting Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Permitting Activity is to provide clearance and permitting services to the permit applicant so they can make changes needed to their plans or pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. 15 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Flood Control District Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Number of floodplain use permit applications reviewed Number of map change reviews completed Number of floodplain use permit applications submitted Number of map change reviews requested Total expenditure per map change review FY 2015 ACTUAL 95.5% FY 2016 REVISED 100.0% FY 2016 FORECAST 100.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 100.0% 73.3% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% $ 15 66,836.73 $ 10 95,616.40 $ 10 97,973.30 $ 10 97,172.80 $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 172,671 172,671 $ $ 134,600 134,600 $ $ 150,762 150,762 $ $ 154,600 154,600 $ $ 20,000 20,000 14.9% 14.9% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 1,002,551 1,002,551 $ $ 956,164 956,164 $ $ 979,733 979,733 $ $ 971,728 971,728 $ $ (15,564) (15,564) -1.6% -1.6% (5.0%) -5.0% 463 100 100 160 60 60.0% 15 463 10 100 10 100 10 160 60 0.0% 60.0% (1,556.40) 0.0% -1.6% Expenditure Activity Narrative: The Flood Control District now serves 14 communities with floodplain management. Two of which have been acquired in the last couple of years. Additionally, the communities have rebounded quicker from the recession due to increased development. Trends are showing this number to continue increasing as well as the revenue associated with floodplain permitting. The unincorporated permits that are processed by the Planning and Development Department in the One Stop Shop are not included in the output of 160, but are also increasing. The slight expenditure increase is due to higher health/dental benefits rates in FY 2017. Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity is to provide inspection and enforcement services to property owners so they can develop their property without adversely affecting surrounding property. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request Number of floodplain complaints investigated Number of floodplain use permit inspections completed Number of floodplain complaints Number of floodplain use permits requiring inspection Total expenditure per floodplain use permit inspection completed FY 2015 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2016 REVISED 100.0% FY 2016 FORECAST 100.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 98.0% 95.4% 100.0% 100.0% 98.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (2.0%) -2.0% (2.0%) -2.0% 119 100 100 125 25 25.0% 152 500 500 500 - 0.0% 119 152 100 500 100 500 125 500 25 - 25.0% 0.0% $ 1,829.23 $ 603.38 $ 490.39 $ 686.40 $ (83.02) 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 8,619 8,619 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 3,000 3,000 $ $ 3,000 3,000 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 278,043 278,043 $ $ 301,690 301,690 $ $ 245,195 245,195 $ $ 343,198 343,198 $ $ (41,508) (41,508) -13.8% N/A N/A Expenditure 16 -13.8% -13.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activity Narrative: There are more miles of floodplain delineations as the District continues to complete studies. Therefore, it is more likely there will be an increase in violations and a slight increase in revenue since development is on the rise again post-recession. The percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt is down because there are more delineations to investigate. Expenditure increase is due to an increase in the complexity of floodplain use permits. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information services to the public and other agencies so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves from injury and loss of property from flooding. Program Results Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received FY 2015 ACTUAL 0.0% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 90.2% 90.2% FY 2017 ADOPTED N/A REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A N/A 90.0% 90.0% N/A N/A N/A 99.5% 98.6% 99.0% 98.6% (0.0%) -0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 90.0% 90.0% N/A N/A N/A Activities that comprise the program include: • Flood Control Customer Service • Flood Control Public Information • • Flood Control Customer Service Activity Flood Safety Education Flood Warning The purpose of the Flood Control Customer Service Activity is to provide responsive flood hazard and mitigation advisory information services to the general public, government agencies and other entities so they can make informed development decisions and be protected from loss of life and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study Number of public meetings held Number of printed materials produced Number of website hits received Number of public meetings required Number of printed materials (including brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ that utilized the District website 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES Flood Control District FY 2015 ACTUAL 0.0% FY 2016 REVISED 90.2% 11 14 334,963,500 11 14 $ $ FY 2016 FORECAST 90.2% 13 50 10,000,000 13 50 FY 2017 ADOPTED N/A 13 50 10,000,000 13 50 REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A 13 55 12,000,000 13 60 5 2,000,000 10 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 7.6% 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 16,729 16,729 $ $ 60,438 60,438 $ $ 34,901 34,901 $ $ 67,032 67,032 $ $ (6,594) (6,594) -10.9% -10.9% Activity Narrative: The 5 year average for customer contacts has been around 5,500. The increase for last year was due to the flood insurance reform and the large number of Flood Insurance Rate Map changes. The District anticipates that inquiries will return to a normal level in FY 2017. The District is no longer conducting surveys therefore the result measure for FY 2017 is not applicable. Expenditure increase is due to changes in the procedures for this division and higher health/dental benefits rates in FY 2017. Flood Control Public Information Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Public Information Activity is to provide project and study information services to affected Maricopa County residents and property owners so they can understand how their flooding risk is being mitigated in order to preclude injury, loss of life, and property damage. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3609E requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED Percent of affected residents surveyed who 0.0% 90.2% 90.2% N/A report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study Number of public meetings held 11 13 13 13 Number of printed materials produced 14 50 50 55 Number of website hits received 334,963,500 10,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 Number of public meetings required 11 13 13 13 Number of printed materials (including 14 50 50 60 brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ that utilized the District website 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 16,729 16,729 $ $ 60,438 60,438 $ $ 34,901 34,901 $ $ 67,032 67,032 $ $ REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A 5 2,000,000 10 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.00 7.6% (6,594) (6,594) -10.9% -10.9% Activity Narrative: Current Administration has discontinued all surveys. The District has begun an advertising campaign engaging various methods including social media to increase traffic to their website. Expenditures will increase as a result. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Safety Education Activity The purpose of the Flood Safety Education Activity is to provide flood and storm water safety education services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can be aware of flood hazards and understand how to avoid injury and loss of life due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Number of school and civic presentations completed Number of school and civic presentations requested Total expenditure per school and civic $ presentation 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 REVISED 90.0% N/A FY 2016 FORECAST 90.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED N/A REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A 12 10 10 10 - 0.0% 12 10 10 10 - 0.0% 34,396.00 $ 33,787.30 $ 29,229.00 $ 34,429.60 $ (642.30) -1.9% 412,752 412,752 $ $ 337,873 337,873 $ $ 292,290 292,290 $ $ 344,296 344,296 $ $ (6,423) (6,423) -1.9% -1.9% Activity Narrative: The Flood Control District no longer conducts the survey, but continues to present at schools and in civic presentations. Expenditure increase is due to higher health/dental benefits rates in FY 2017. Flood Warning Activity The purpose of the Flood Warning Activity is to provide reliable weather, water level and stream flow information and flood response planning services to public safety managers so they can make public safety decisions in a timely and effective manner. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 requires the District to operate in accordance with Federal guidance that is normally issued in the form of structure Operating and Maintenance Manuals. The manuals federally direct the District to operate and maintain the structure and other equipment installed during construction in accordance with the standard in that manual. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and related laws require entities such as the District to protect those in a floodplain. In order to fulfill this requirement, monitoring is required to provide sufficient lead-time to allow evacuation of those in danger. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Number of sensor-days during which District ALERT system sensors are operational Number of flood response plans completed Number of sensor-days during which ALERT system sensors are needed Number of flood response plans requested Total activity expenditure per operational $ ALERT sensor-day FY 2015 ACTUAL 99.5% FY 2016 REVISED 98.6% FY 2016 FORECAST 99.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.0%) -0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 248,745 248,902 254,093 266,325 17,423 7.0% 1 250,019 1 252,434 1 256,609 1 270,100 17,666 0.0% 7.0% 1 5.16 $ 1 5.02 $ 1 4.63 $ 1 4.59 $ 0.43 0.0% 8.6% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 100 100 $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ 7,100 7,100 $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 1,282,930 1,282,930 $ $ 1,249,054 1,249,054 $ $ 1,176,211 1,176,211 $ $ 1,222,157 1,222,157 $ $ 26,897 26,897 2.2% 2.2% Expenditure 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activity Narrative: The District added 14 new weather stations since July 2015 accounting for the increase in sensor days. The slight decrease in expenditures is due to an increase in efficiencies with the new weather stations. Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide flood hazard information and solution services to government entities so they can utilize knowledge of flood hazards to protect the public and infrastructure. Program Results Measure Description Percent of linear miles of floodplains delineated Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards FY 2015 ACTUAL 68.6% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 70.5% 68.7% 60.4% 42.1% 42.1% FY 2017 ADOPTED 0.6% 47.9% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (69.9%) -99.1% 5.8% 13.7% Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Hazard Planning • Floodplain Delineation Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services to municipalities and public agencies so they can have the information necessary to mitigate identified flood and erosion hazards. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 20 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Measure Description Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards Cumulative square miles of Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed through the end of this fiscal year Number of linear miles of watercourse where Watercourse Master Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of new Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of updated Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Total number of square miles identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Number of linear miles of watercourse identified for Watercourse Master Plans Number of population in areas identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Total activity expenditure per number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year Flood Control District FY 2015 ACTUAL 60.4% FY 2016 REVISED 42.1% FY 2016 FORECAST 42.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 5.8% 13.7% FY 2017 ADOPTED 47.9% 223 3,557 3,557 3,690 133 - 20 20 - 122,396 186,386 186,386 365,434 147 394 394 68 (326) -82.7% 6 155 155 65 (90) -58.0% 7,877 8,271 8,271 8,271 - 0.0% 192 211 211 211 - 0.0% 3,731,063 3,917,447 3,917,447 3,917,447 - 0.0% 17.61 57.2% (20) 179,048 3.7% -100.0% 96.1% $ 34.15 $ 30.78 $ 28.84 $ 13.16 $ 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 273,709 273,709 $ $ 468,774 468,774 $ $ 521,291 521,291 $ $ 5,000 5,000 $ $ (463,774) (463,774) -98.9% -98.9% 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 188,808 3,991,604 4,180,412 $ 603,774 5,132,631 5,736,405 $ 603,774 4,771,959 5,375,733 $ 5,000 4,804,895 4,809,895 $ 598,774 327,736 926,510 99.2% 6.4% 16.2% Revenue Expenditure $ $ $ $ $ Activity Narrative: Demand and Output is driven by changes in population, land development, emergent flooding issues, and technological improvements. Population density varies with each project, causing fluctuations in the number of residents that will benefit. These variable parameters in combination with the duration of individual studies can vary and typically require multiple years to complete which will then cause fluctuations in the Output from year to year. Population density varies with each project causing fluctuations in the number of residents and associated benefits. The District will not complete any Watercourse Master Plans in FY 2017. The Area Drainage Master Studies (ADMS’s) that are currently underway and scheduled for the next year are within the more urban areas of Ahwatukee Foothills, Lower Indian Bend Wash, Middle Indian Bend Wash, East Fork Cave Creek, Paradise Valley/Scottsdale/Phoenix Shea Corridor, North Mesa, South Phoenix/Laveen, Tempe and various Design Concept Reports (DCR’s). The decrease in revenue is a result of a decrease in anticipated grant activity. The decrease in expenditures can be attributed to the decrease in District construction projects that will be completed in FY 2017. Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide National Floodplain Insurance Programbased flood hazard identification services to floodplain administrators so they can have the necessary information available to regulate floodplains. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3605, 48-3606, 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 21 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of linear miles of floodplains delineated Number of cumulative linear miles of floodplains delineated through the end of the fiscal year Linear miles of floodplains currently under delineation study Linear miles of floodplain delineated this fiscal year Total number of linear miles of floodplains requiring delineation Total activity expenditure per linear mile of $ floodplain delineated this fiscal year 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ Flood Control District FY 2015 ACTUAL 68.6% FY 2016 REVISED 70.5% FY 2016 FORECAST 68.7% FY 2017 ADOPTED 0.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (69.9%) -99.1% 4,107 4,222 4,110 4,110 (112) -2.7% 197 105 105 36 (69) -65.7% 20 105 105 36 (69) -65.7% 5,985 5,985 5,985 5,985 - 85,648.82 $ 20,601.62 $ 18,300.64 $ 55,098.69 $ 1,747,236 1,747,236 $ $ 2,163,170 2,163,170 $ $ 1,921,567 1,921,567 $ $ 1,983,553 1,983,553 $ $ (34,497.08) 179,617 179,617 0.0% -167.4% 8.3% 8.3% Activity Narrative: The number of new linear miles to be completed in FY 2016 has been reduced. Due to the size and complexity of the delineations for FY 2017 there will be less linear miles completed. Expenditure increase is due to the increased complexity of delineations and higher health/dental benefits rates in FY 2017. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Program Results Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year FY 2015 ACTUAL 11.8% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 0.1% 0.1% FY 2017 ADOPTED 12.8% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 12.7% 12568.8% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% (9.1%) -9.1% 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Control Capital Projects • Flood Control Structure Maintenance Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural flood protection services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can have increased physical protection from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 and 45-1424 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Number of capital projects completed this fiscal year Number of Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones completed this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding Number of square miles of area benefited by projects in current five-year Capital Improvement Program Number of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects requested this fiscal year Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding Total activity expenditure per capital project $ completed this fiscal year 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ FY 2015 ACTUAL 11.8% FY 2016 REVISED 0.1% FY 2016 FORECAST 0.1% FY 2017 ADOPTED 12.8% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 12.7% 12568.8% 2 2 2 4 2 6 13 13 12 (1) -7.7% 4 7 7 6 (1) -14.3% 662 592 592 592 (0) -0.0% 7 13 13 12 (1) -7.7% 5 7 7 7 - 0.0% $ 19,657,418.25 $ (19,540,686.85) -16739.9% $ $ 48,561.78 $ 116,731.40 $ 94,177.78 37,131,014 $ 68,648,616 $ 59,947,158 (30,000,000) 7,131,014 $ (34,195,616) 34,453,000 $ (34,195,616) 25,751,542 $ 66,347,177 100.0% (2,301,439) -3.4% 8,786,939 6,485,500 -25.7% 18.8% $ 8,720,580 (9,446,654) 24.7% -13.9% (25,408,677) 78,629,673 $ (8,786,939) (9,513,013) 25.7% -13.8% (25,408,677) 40,938,500 $ Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ 30,756,775 31,405,689 $ (30,000,000) 32,162,464 $ 35,312,276 68,000,000 $ (34,195,616) 69,116,660 $ 35,023,971 54,934,307 $ (34,195,616) 55,762,662 $ 26,591,696 77,446,654 Activity Narrative: Benefited areas vary greatly from project to project and year to year. In FY 2016 the District will complete two small projects. In FY 2017 the District will complete three much larger projects, including two large dam rehabilitation projects with very large benefited areas. The number of projects completed varies from year to year, depending on budget, schedule, partner interest and other factors. The number of projects approved varies from year to year depending on customer demand and available funding. The number of Small Project Assistance projects requested is dependent on community needs and those projects requested. The variability of the expenditure ration is directly 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District related to the ultimate overall cost of projects in the benefited areas. The FY 2017 increase in expenditures is due to the scheduled completion of critical projects identified from the flooding that occurred in 2014. Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity is to provide flood control infrastructure maintenance services that meet federal, state and local safety and operational standards for residents and visitors of Maricopa County so they can experience protection from flooding as a consequence of safe and well maintained flood control structures. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 45-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year Number of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed Number of Work Orders completed Number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed Number of dam assessments provided this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones completed this fiscal year Number of Work Order requests submitted Number of dam assessments required this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year Total activity expenditure per Work Order completed FY 2015 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2016 REVISED 100.0% FY 2016 FORECAST 100.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% (9.1%) -9.1% 34 30 42 34 4 972 62 993 83 997 87 873 62 (120) (21) -12.1% -25.3% 22 22 22 20 (2) -9.1% 1 1 1 6 5 1,025 22 993 22 1,040 22 928 20 1 1 1 6 (65) (2) 5 13.3% 500.0% -6.5% -9.1% 500.0% $ 9,819.68 $ 11,646.62 $ 10,958.98 $ 11,816.65 $ (170.03) -1.5% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 2,528 2,528 $ $ - $ $ 4,195 4,195 $ $ 25,000 25,000 $ $ 25,000 25,000 N/A N/A 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 9,544,725 9,544,725 $ $ 11,565,093 11,565,093 $ $ 10,926,100 10,926,100 $ $ 10,315,934 10,315,934 $ $ 1,249,159 1,249,159 10.8% 10.8% Expenditure Activity Narrative: The District owns, operates and maintains 83 flood control structures including 22 dams/flood retarding structures totaling 64 miles in length, 150 miles of channels and levees, 250 acres of basins, and 40 acres of general flood hazard mitigation property. Flood control structures require regular inspections and maintenance to function as designed and provide the maximum flood protection. This maintenance is performed by the staff of the District’s Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Division. This year the District is adding the Loop 303 project to the maintenance program. This structure is 4.5 miles in length. The District’s most significant structures are approaching their design life and maintenance costs will continue to increase on a long-term basis to extend the life of these structures. Two dams are under rehabilitation so they will not be inspected. This number will return to 22 when construction is complete. The number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed would be in the 60’s if it weren’t for the storm event of 2014. The District anticipates returning to normal numbers for 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FY 2017. The construction on the dam rehabilitations will be well under way in FY 2017 so more milestones will be met. Revenue increase is from cost share partnerships. Although expenditures decreased for FY 2017, increases are anticipated in the upcoming fiscal years due to the need to increase maintenance personnel and contracted repair work. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Beginning in FY 2016 for Tax Year 2015, the Flood Control District secondary property tax will no longer assess property valuation based on full cash value, but instead on limited property value and will have a growth cap of 5% on property taxed in the prior year. This change in property tax collections is due to a voter approved Proposition 117 that was approved in 2012. Previously, secondary net assessed values of real and personal property had no constitutional limitation on growth. The Flood Control District Board of Directors chose to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy resulting in a 2% cap annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 45,937,945 54,751,263 54,862,329 45,681,391 35,056,838 30,665,493 28,622,833 31,339,191 31,100,587 32,624,765 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.1533 0.1367 0.1367 0.1489 0.1780 0.1780 0.1392 0.1392 0.1592 0.1792 Tax Levy 70,422,870 74,674,333 74,996,804 68,019,592 62,401,172 54,584,578 39,842,985 43,660,332 49,512,136 58,463,580 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2017. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate for FY 2017 will increase to $0.1792 per $100 net assessed value, resulting in a levy increase of $8,951,444. 60 $0.2500 50 $0.2000 40 $0.1500 30 $0.1000 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0500 10 0 $07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Fiscal Year The FY 2017 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $58,463,580, an increase from the FY 2016 Adopted Levy. 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FY 2017 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY: FY 2017 Adopted $ FY 2016 Adopted $ FY 2017 Variance $ 32,624,765,419 $ 31,100,587,859 $ 1,524,177,560 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Revenue from Value w/SRP 1-cent Levy 112,776,850 $ 116,866,656 $ (4,089,806) $ 32,737,542,269 $ 31,217,454,515 $ 1,520,087,754 $ 3,273,754 $ 3,121,745 $ 152,009 $ SRP Payment in Total Tax Levy & Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) PILT Tax Rates 0.1792 $ 0.1592 $ 0.0200 $ 58,463,580 $ 49,512,136 $ 8,951,444 $ 202,096 $ 186,052 $ 16,044 $ Levy Limit FY 2017 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2017 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 97,058,677 0.2975 FY 2017 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 58,463,580 0.1792 Amount Under Limit: $ 38,595,097 39.8% 0.1183 FY 2017 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" TOTAL LEVY FY 2017 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 50,144,264 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.1537 FY 2017 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 58,463,580 0.1792 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ FY 2017 Median Residential Limited Property Value $ "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 26 $ (8,319,316) -16.6% (0.0255) 121,100 18.61 21.70 (3.09) -16.6% 58,665,676 49,698,188 8,967,488 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2017 vs. FY 2016 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2016: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2017: Median Residential Limited Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ 116,078 0.1592 18.48 121,100 0.1792 21.70 (3.22) -17.4% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2017 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2017. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2017 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 58,463,580 $ 57,762,017 Rate 98.8% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2015 actual, the FY 2016 forecast and the FY 2017 budget revenue for this category. FY 2015 revenue was higher than FY 2016 forecast and FY 2017 budget because the complexity of the requested permits has dropped. Licenses and Permits Revenue $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $FY 2015 Actual FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. 27 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2016 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of SRP’s increase in estimated net assessed value. Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2016 budget is reflective of receiving $38,733,500 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. FY 2015 revenues were higher than budgeted for FY 2017 due to a decrease in land sales during these fiscal years. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2008 149,582 2009 135,796 2010 144,249 2011 156,110 2012 186,613 2013 192,535 2014 151,252 2015 152,482 2016* 186,618 2017** 202,096 * Forecast ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $FY 2015 Actual FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfer $40 $35 $(Millions) $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 2015 2016 28 2017 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Flood Control District fund balances are “Restricted”. Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2015 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED $ - $ - $ - $ 84,901 $ 2,418 $ $ $ 521,291 521,291 $ $ 468,774 468,774 $ $ 345,000 345,000 $ $ 6,027 267,682 273,709 $ 5,000 5,000 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 188,808 188,808 $ 345,000 345,000 $ 603,774 603,774 $ 603,774 603,774 $ 5,000 5,000 Structural Balance $ 6,027 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 84,901 84,901 $ - $ - $ (135,000) (135,000) $ 2,418 2,418 $ 2,418 2,418 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 33,496,573 $ 17,048,755 $ 17,048,755 $ 20,979,321 $ 6,347,003 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 44,989,066 44,989,066 $ $ 49,642,254 49,642,254 $ $ 49,642,254 49,642,254 $ $ 50,381,797 50,381,797 $ $ 58,718,342 58,718,342 $ $ $ 30,818,499 34,195,616 65,014,115 $ $ 32,495,393 34,195,616 66,691,009 $ $ 32,495,393 34,195,616 66,691,009 $ $ 27,506,348 30,000,000 57,506,348 $ 32,495,393 25,408,677 57,904,070 Structural Balance $ 17,482,718 $ 17,146,861 $ 17,146,861 $ 19,563,298 $ 26,222,949 Accounting Adjustments $ 30 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 20,979,321 20,979,321 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 6,347,003 6,347,003 $ $ 7,161,275 7,161,275 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 7,507,905 $ 6,504,950 $ 6,504,950 $ 13,233,234 $ 18,246,085 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 37,131,014 37,131,014 $ 68,648,616 68,648,616 $ 68,648,616 68,648,616 $ 59,947,158 59,947,158 $ 66,347,177 66,347,177 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 31,405,689 31,405,689 $ 68,000,000 68,000,000 $ 68,000,000 68,000,000 $ 54,934,307 54,934,307 $ 77,446,654 77,446,654 Accounting Adjustments $ 4 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 13,233,234 13,233,234 $ $ 7,153,566 7,153,566 $ $ 7,153,566 7,153,566 $ $ 18,246,085 18,246,085 $ $ 7,146,608 7,146,608 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Grants Fund (989) NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants GRIC Flood Control Grant FEMA Grant FY16 345,000 $ 258,774 $ 135,000 123,774 123,774 123,774 $ 603,774 $ 468,774 $ (603,774) $ (345,000) (135,000) (123,774) (468,774) (345,000) (123,774) $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 C-69-16-018-2-00 C-69-16-019-2-00 Agenda Item: C-69-15-017-G-00 C-69-16-018-2-00 C-69-16-019-2-00 FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Grants GRIC Flood Control Grant 345,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants FEMA Grant GRIC Flood Control Grant FEMA Grant FY16 $ Agenda Item: C-69-16-018-2-00 FY 2017 Adopted Budget 30 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 49,642,254 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 49,642,254 FY 2017 Baseline Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 49,642,254 $ 236,826 $ 244,264 (8,564) 1,126 (236,826) $ 722,523 - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Vacancy Savings Assoc with Benefit Adjustments Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Increase Central Services Cost Allocation Increase Capital Equipment Radio Charges Adjustment Risk Management Adjustment Base Telecom Adjustment Personnel Savings From 5.17% to 10.15% Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes Agenda Item: $ $ 326,748 395,775 458 15,253 87,323 (1,062,383) $ (1,062,383) $ - $ - $ - 216,017 216,017 8,860,071 16,044 8,844,027 32,495,393 $ 0.0% 58,718,342 18.3% $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount - $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 34,195,616 $ - FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 34,195,616 $ - $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) - $ - $ - $ 25,408,677 $ 25,408,677 - $ 25,408,677 $ - Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget 31 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 68,000,000 $ 34,453,000 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 68,000,000 $ 34,453,000 $ (68,000,000) $ (68,000,000) (34,453,000) (34,453,000) $ - $ - $ 77,446,654 $ 77,446,654 38,733,500 38,733,500 $ 77,446,654 $ 38,733,500 $ - $ - 2,205,000 2,205,000 $ 77,446,654 $ Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2017 Tentative Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget Expenditures 40,938,500 Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ - $ 34,195,616 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ - $ 34,195,616 $ - $ - (34,195,616) (34,195,616) $ - $ - $ - $ - 25,408,677 25,408,677 $ - $ 25,408,677 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) FY 2016 Revised Budget $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 34,195,616 34,195,616 $ - $ - $ (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) (25,408,677) (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) $ (25,408,677) Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by A.R.S. Title 48 in accordance with District Resolution 2010R008, which specifies the Board’s financial management directives for the District. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Project Description • Funding Commitment and Agency Priority • Flood Control/Drainage Master Plan Element • Flooding Threat • Level of Protection • Area Protected • Ancillary Benefits • Level of Partnership Participation • Operations and Maintenance Costs to the District The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promotes community development, protects natural habitats and maintains watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 3 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2017, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: Previous 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total Actuals $ 153,750,654 153,750,654 $ Projected FY 2016 19,000 92,455 51,223,964 51,335,419 $ Year 1 Year 2 FY 2017 1,782,250 320,000 75,344,404 77,446,654 $ FY 2018 1,980,000 300,000 59,490,000 61,770,000 $ Year 3 Year 4 FY 2019 1,996,000 300,000 32,869,000 35,165,000 $ FY 2020 2,016,000 320,000 38,339,000 40,675,000 $ Year 5 FY 2021 2,016,000 320,000 42,664,000 45,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 9,790,250 1,560,000 248,706,404 260,056,654 $ Total Project 9,809,250 1,652,455 453,681,022 465,142,727 Sources and Uses by Project FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SOURCES 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 205A - 2050130 GUADALUPE FRS REHAB 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 620G - 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH FCPR - PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Actuals FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 3,553,440 5,700,484 140,000 493,388 9,887,312 $ 4,400,000 10,390,585 9,750,000 24,540,585 $ 10,638,000 12,968,500 17,332,000 40,938,500 $ 34 27,165,250 27,165,250 $ Year 4 - $ FY 2020 735,000 507,000 1,250,000 1,175,000 3,667,000 $ Year 5 FY 2021 1,430,000 1,250,000 899,000 50,000 250,000 3,879,000 $ 5-Year Total 735,000 10,638,000 1,937,000 12,968,500 44,497,250 2,500,000 2,074,000 50,000 250,000 75,649,750 $ Total Project 735,000 18,591,440 1,937,000 29,059,569 54,247,250 2,640,000 2,567,388 50,000 250,000 110,077,647 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Project (continued) Previous FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS USES 017A - 0170630 ALERT2 SYST UPGRADE 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 109A - 109 02 30 AGUA FRIA LEVEE IMP 117C - 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN 121A - 1210332 RITTENHOUSE BASIN 121B - 1210333 CHANDLER HEIGHTS BASIN 201A - 2010131 WHITE TANKS 4 OUTLET 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 202B - 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 204A - 2040130 MCMICKEN DAM OUT IMPR 205A - 2050130 GUADALUPE FRS REHAB 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 211A - 2110331 DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 265A - 2650130 GRANITE REEF WASH 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 331A - 3310130 SADDLEBACK FRS MOD 350B - 3500130 CAVE BUTTES DAM MOD 361A - 3610130 SKUNK CREEK AT I17 370A - 3700130 NEW RIVER DAM OUTLET 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 420E - 4200531 ELLSWORTH MCKELLIPS 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470D - 4701331 BULLARD WASH PH II 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 470H - 4701531 NORTHERN PKWY PH I 470L - 4701630 LUKE AFB FLOOD MITIG 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 480E - 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 565B - 5650432 DRCC AVONDALE 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 565D - 5650435 VNBRN CHNL 99TH TO AFR 620G - 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH 625J - 6250130 DOWNTOWN PHOENIX PH I 625L - 6250232 ARCADIA DR STRM DRAN 670A - 6700130 ASHBROOK WASH CHANNEL 698A - 6981030 EMF MAINT RD IMP 69D1 - 6991730 9054 S. CALLE SAHUARO 69D2 - 6991731 63RD ST BROADWAY ROAD 69D3 - 6991732 EXTENSION AND 2ND AVE 69D4 - 6991733 SOLOMON & SOUTHERN 69D5 - 6991734 47TH & PARADISE LN 69D6 - 6991735 OSBORN 48TH TO 49TH ST 69D7 - 6991736 51ST OLNEY & DOBBINS 69D8 - 6991737 SHERWOOD HGHTS BASIN F699 - SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE PRGM 700P - 7001230 FPAP HILL 700V - 7001236 FPAP WICKENBURG F700 - FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP FCPR - PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD Project Total $ Projected Actuals 1,109,024 3,049 768,808 8,725,948 3,049,161 809,495 10,768,739 4,542,682 196,889 12,359,042 1,084,122 710,322 8,895 6,206,550 1,103,687 2,266,820 100,702 13,055 912,148 125,764 1,274,031 115,121 40,619,348 5,743,413 19,366 18,537,204 18,688,239 96,574 6,026,878 6,013 11,217 6,919,428 310,676 516,744 1,500 153,750,654 $ FY 2016 116,437 240 45,392 6,847 8,886 7,173,144 788,956 718,651 16,415,432 2,834 43,864 14,250 18,323,405 791,513 1,364 178 480 397,013 8,684 581,640 745 2,000 4,382 1,579,432 1,225 1,046 11,000 1,000 93,742 2,000 2,088,182 19,000 87,168 5,287 2,000,000 51,335,419 $ Year 1 Year 2 FY 2017 120,000 2,000 2,000 3,505,000 2,000 6,000 16,000 21,666,000 735,000 50,000 2,000 25,337,000 2,000 8,000 8,000 23,610,000 2,000 40,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 50,000 5,000 2,000 8,000 4,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 2,000 95,750 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 174,500 44,000 26,000 250,000 119,404 77,446,654 $ FY 2018 370,000 2,000 2,000 1,100,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 342,000 700,000 50,000 30,000 820,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 43,434,000 2,000 30,000 2,000 30,000 30,000 2,000 50,000 2,000 30,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 1,980,000 300,000 4,000 12,414,000 61,770,000 $ Year 3 FY 2019 30,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 5,117,000 5,000 80,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,526,000 2,000 80,000 2,000 80,000 80,000 2,000 50,000 2,000 5,080,000 4,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 10,000 2,000 3,000 10,000 1,996,000 300,000 296,000 9,369,000 35,165,000 $ Year 4 FY 2020 30,000 1,472,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 3,640,000 10,781,000 1,050,000 800,000 2,000 2,000 2,529,000 30,000 2,000 7,065,000 205,000 1,140,000 2,550,000 2,000 2,450,000 2,000 200,000 4,000 3,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 2,000 60,000 2,000 3,000 10,000 2,016,000 320,000 1,068,000 3,215,000 40,675,000 $ Year 5 FY 2021 30,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,052,000 13,100,000 1,050,000 2,300,000 2,000 2,000 6,345,000 2,000 2,000 200,000 2,550,000 2,000 1,898,000 2,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 110,000 2,000 2,000 2,016,000 320,000 6,987,000 45,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 580,000 1,480,000 10,000 4,605,000 10,000 14,000 11,712,000 22,013,000 30,433,000 2,205,000 3,212,000 26,159,000 10,000 16,000 8,886,000 79,602,000 10,000 7,415,000 211,000 1,255,000 5,212,000 10,000 4,498,000 13,000 2,000 5,318,000 20,000 10,000 4,000 19,000 16,000 20,000 118,000 76,000 10,000 18,000 32,000 95,750 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 174,500 8,008,000 44,000 26,000 1,490,000 1,368,000 32,104,404 260,056,654 $ Total Project 1,805,461 1,483,289 10,000 5,419,200 8,735,948 3,070,008 12,530,381 39,954,883 35,764,638 3,120,540 3,212,000 54,933,474 1,096,956 770,186 8,909,145 104,131,955 1,113,687 10,473,333 313,066 1,268,233 6,124,628 135,764 6,169,044 136,805 41,202,988 11,062,158 41,366 18,551,586 20,271,671 116,799 6,043,924 37,013 130,217 7,089,170 12,000 2,416,858 548,744 95,750 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 174,500 8,027,000 131,168 31,287 1,490,000 1,369,500 34,104,404 465,142,727 Strategic Business Planning (SBP) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By June 30, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Projects Program submittals. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Result Measures: FY 2015 Actual Measure Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year. 11.80% FY 2016 Forecast 0.1% FY 2017 Projected with Capital Improvement 12.80% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 592 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP. Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADMS – Area Drainage Master Study ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR – Arizona Department of Water Resources SPAP – Small Projects Assistance Program CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service Buckeye Wash 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: District Scheduled Completion ALERT2 System Upgrade Project All FY 2016 Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements 1 FY 2022 Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements 1 FY 2025 Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation Improvement 4 FY 2027 27 Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin 5 FY 2017 South Phoenix/Laveen Drainage Improvement Project 5 FY 2033 Berneil Channel Modifications 2 FY 2025 Rittenhouse Basin 1 FY 2020 Chandler Heights Detention Basin 1 FY 2027 1,2 FY 2027 Reata Pass Drainage 2 FY 2022 White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet 4 FY 2026 White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2018 McMicken Dam Rehabilitation 4 FY 2033 McMicken Dam Outlet Channel 4 FY 2027 Guadalupe FRS Rehabilitation 1,5 FY 2021 Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2018 Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain 4 FY 2027 Watson Drainage System 4 FY 2027 Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project 2 FY 2024 PVR Rehabilitation/Replacement 1 FY 2026 Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation 4 FY 2020 Saddleback FRS Modifications 5 FY 2025 Cave Buttes Dam Modifications 3 FY 2027 I-17/Skunk Creek Land Rights Acquisition and Access Improvements 3 FY 2020 New River Dam Outlet Improvements 4 FY 2020 Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain 2 FY 2021 Ellsworth Road & McKellips Road Drainage Improvements 2 FY 2027 115 Avenue/Union Hills Drive Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2023 Bullard Wash Phase II 4 FY 2027 Loop 303 Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2017 Northern Parkway Drainage 4 FY 2020 Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements 4 FY 2026 Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) 1 FY 2020 th East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel th 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Improvement Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (Broadway Rd./Southern Ave.) District Scheduled Completion 1 FY 2017 5 FY 2027 th 5 FY 2025 Van Buren Street Channel - 99 Avenue to Agua Fria River th Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75 Avenue/107 Avenue) th 5 FY 2027 Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79 Avenue to 59 Avenue) 5 FY 2022 Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) 5 FY 2017 Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III 2 FY 2027 Circle K Park Detention Basin 5 FY 2024 Ashbrook Wash Improvements 2 FY 2016 1, 2 FY 2027 th th East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: ALERT2 System Upgrade Project (017A) Project Partner: N/A ALERT2 is the new standard protocol designed to replace the existing ALERT. ALERT2 provides a graceful transition of real-time data collection systems from providing slow, lean, error-prone environmental data to receiving fast, information-rich, error-free knowledge about events in the real world. It differs from ALERT in that it is much faster, carries more information, and operates virtually error free. Using a channel sharing technique called TDMA, where each transmitter has its own brief time slot in which to transmit, the message contention and data loss problems of ALERT can be minimized. It has a large enough ID space to eliminate the ID assignment problems common in some areas of the country. Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Project involves installation of 15 catch basins, Ivanhoe Drain slope realignment, and new storm drain construction to eliminate all discharges into Chandler Drain. Project corrects flooding problem in flat downtown area, removes connection to SRP tailwater drainage system and improves measures associated with MS4 Phase II permit. Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements (TBD) Project Partner: City of Tempe Mitigate flooding of 21 homes in the area during the 100-year storm event by constructing a series of storm drains in Loma Vista, Alameda and Los Feliz Drives with an outfall into an expanded detention basin at the NW corner of McClintock High school. 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Provide safety and fall protection by installing pipe rail along Agua Fria levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin (117C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project includes constructing a detention basin that will be designed for a 100-year level of protection and is a part of the overall drainage system plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP area. The basin will provide flood protection for residential developments existing and planned for the area and may have multi-use recreational amenities. South Phoenix/Laveen Drainage Improvement Project (TBD) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project includes constructing multiple regional detention basins and storm drains, which are generally bound by 7th Avenue, Olney Avenue, 19th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. Study update is underway. Berneil Channel Modifications (TBD) Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley Channel improvements are needed to increase channel capacity to convey a 10-year to 100-year rain event. Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert Construction of the basin and flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active as the District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. Chandler Heights Detention Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert Construction of the detention basin is being accomplished in phases. The first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as District funding becomes available. Material may also be removed through the dirt auction process. East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel (TBD) Project Partner: N/A Due to the topography of the area, the East Mesa Floodway (EMF) has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications. 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Reata Pass Drainage (TBD) Project Partners: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale is the lead for this project and the project is a high priority for the City. It is anticipated that the project will consist of some kind of channelization of Reata Pass Wash. The City will coordinate their design with the District, and the City has indicated that they will request cost share funding for construction of the project. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A Construction will involve an outlet pipe from the White Tanks FRS No.4 to the Loop 303 Outfall channel that ultimately discharges to the Gila River. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Rehabilitation will mitigate existing dam deficiencies and extend the functional life of the structure. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is complete. Phase two of the work began construction in FY 2016 which includes removing the left auxiliary spillway by extending the left abutment of the dam to the north, widening the right auxiliary spillway to accommodate the removal of the left spillway and re-grading the flood pool. McMicken Dam Rehabilitation (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives include a modified dam section, floodways, outlet and spillways which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. Project is being completed through five (5) separate construction phases. McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (204A) Project Partner: N/A The primary goal of the project is to reconstruct the Outlet Channel so as to mitigate current deficiencies, lower risk, and meet District requirements for flood protection, for the 100-year flood. Guadalupe FRS Rehabilitation (205A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Dam rehabilitation work will include the replacement of the intake structure, installation of filter diaphragm around principal spillway, slip line existing principal spillway through dam and slip line the existing principal spillway downstream of the dam. Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking since being constructed in the 70's. Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Construction will be accomplished in two phases and Phase 2A is currently in construction. Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: City of Buckeye The project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Watson Drainage System (211B) Project Partner: City of Buckeye Project includes several branches of channels, culverts and detention basins spanning more than 10 miles, draining from the Roosevelt Irrigation District canal on the north to the Gila River on the south. The project will be implemented in phases. The District will be responsible for final design and construction of the downstream portion that provides the outfall from the north side of the Union Pacific Railroad to the Gila River. Buckeye will implement the upstream portions through future development and capital projects. Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The project will construct infrastructure to intercept storm water flows from the Granite Reef Watershed and convey them to the Salt River. Project also eliminates a 100-year flood hazard affecting at least 1,200 property owners within Scottsdale alone. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The ADWR recently reclassified the PVR FRS’s as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis (FFMA) Report for the Structures Assessment Program Phase I in July 2002 that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. Project pre-design is complete. Powerline FRS and Vineyard FRS Phase 2 and 3 are under design. The selected alternative involves rehabilitating Vineyard Road FRS, converting Rittenhouse FRS to a levee and replacing the Powerline FRS with a system of channels. Phase I of Vineyard is currently under construction. Total project completion including Rittenhouse is scheduled for 2026. Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation (TBD) Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides comprehensive rock mulch and hydroseed treatments for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon District funding availability. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modifications will consist of two major features. The first planned improvement (Phase I) will be a drainage tunnel gated outlet and channel, which will decrease the time it takes for the water collected behind the dam to drain. The second planned improvement (Phase II) will be a system to collect water that has seeped through the dam and foundation. I-17/Skunk Creek Land Rights Acquisition and Access Improvements (361A) Project Partner: N/A District staff has identified the need to secure additional land rights to improve access for routine inspections, repairs & maintenance activities of Skunk Creek in the vicinity of Interstate 17. New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370A) Project Partner: N/A Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain involves construction of a detention basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project will include construction of a detention basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 115th Avenue/Union Hills Drive Drainage Improvements (450G) Project Partner: MCDOT, City of Peoria and City of Surprise The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The project will be constructed in three phases. Phase I final design and construction documents are complete. Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This storm water would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Phase I of the Bullard Wash Improvements Project has been completed and included construction of an earthen and gabion basket-lined channel from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road. Phase II will be implemented as funds become available and includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment, which is located between Estrella Parkway and Bullard Avenue from Lower Buckeye Road to Interstate 10. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: City of Goodyear, MCDOT and ADOT The new outfall drainage system will collect and carry storm water runoff to the Gila River and reduce the chance of property damage and flooding for the future freeway and adjacent areas during a major storm event. Drainage improvements include construction of a concrete-lined channel, box culverts, storm drain pipe, retaining walls and landscaping. Additional improvements include street and irrigation system reconstruction for the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) and Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District (BWCDD). Project right-of-way condemnations are complete and construction will be completed at the start of FY 2017. Northern Parkway Drainage (470H) Project Partner: City of Goodyear, MCDOT and ADOT This project involves the construction of a new channel, storm drain and basins along the new alignment of Northern Parkway from Dysart Road to 111th Avenue. The channel will intercept offsite storm water flows and convey this runoff to the Agua Fria River. Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements (470L) Project Partner: Luke Air Force Base The project includes rehabilitating and improving the existing storm drain system to collect and convey 100-year flows from sensitive areas on the base to the improved channel system containing those flows within the channel system and provide a connection to the existing regional outfall. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Town of Queen Creek and MCDOT The project involves the channelization of an existing wash from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road along the existing alignment, and the east branch from Hawes Road to Crismon Road along Riggs Road. The total length of the project is approximately 3.5 miles. The channel will be earth-lined with 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District rock slope protection with 4:1 to 8:1 side slopes and a 50-foot bottom width. The project will include multi-use components such as equestrian and pedestrian trails. Phase IIB (Ellsworth Road to Crismon Road) construction will occur in the future by the Town of Queen Creek and the project remains active so District construction management can occur when the next phase is implemented. The project is anticipated to remove the existing floodplain extending from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, which includes 71 acres of land and 68 properties. Queen Creek operates and maintains the facility. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: N/A Phase III is being constructed in an additional two phases in which the first was completed in May 2012. Main Branch Phase IIIA1 from Riggs Road to Empire Boulevard and Phase IIIA2 from Empire Blvd to Hunt Highway in Pinal County construction were completed in October 2013. The West Branch Phase IIIB construction is now complete. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain, and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (Broadway Rd./Southern Ave.) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale This phase of the DRCC will construct a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix This phase of the project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will include constructing basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. Upon completion, the basins and culverts will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. Van Buren Street Channel – 99th Avenue to Agua Fria River (565D) Project Partner: City of Avondale The Van Buren Street Channel will be designed to provide a drainage system along Van Buren Street carrying storm water west of 99th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The channel project will improve storm water drainage in the Avondale City Center at Avondale Boulevard (115th Avenue) and Van Buren Street, and solve other crucial drainage issues for current and future development along Van Buren Street. When completed, the channel will provide flood hazard protection up to the 10-year storm event (10% chance of occurring in a year). Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale The project consists of a 10-year storm drain on Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The storm drain will collect and convey sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix This project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. The project’s involves the installation of storm drains and other various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. Project construction is complete but remains active to complete the final archeological reporting requirements. Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix This third phase of the Arcadia Area Improvement project will include construction of interceptor storm drains, primarily in Arcadia Drive. Drains will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. Circle K Park Detention Basin (TBD) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The project will construct a 35 ac-ft detention basin and will provide storage for a 10-year event. Properties and structures downstream will be benefited. Ashbrook Wash Improvements (670A) Project Partner: Town of Fountain Hills The Ashbrook Wash Improvement Project is expected to include replacing two culvert crossings (at Bayfield Drive and Saguaro Boulevard), as well as cleaning and channelizing Ashbrook Wash as necessary to ensure it can safely convey flood flows. Once completed, properties adjacent to Ashbrook Wash between Bayfield Drive and Del Cambre Avenue will be protected from flooding caused by 100year flows through the wash, or flows that have a one percent chance of occurring in any given year. The design and construction are being coordinated with the Saguaro Boulevard Reconstruction Project. Project is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion in FY 2020. East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. Auxiliary Budget Line (FCIP) Project Partner: N/A Several District projects did not have accounting lines at the time of this document’s preparation and were placed under this function code. 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: District Scheduled Completion 5 FY 2017 2 FY 2017 1 FY 2017 5 FY 2017 3 FY 2017 2 FY 2017 51 Avenue Storm Drain 5 FY 2017 Sherwood Heights Detention Basin 2 FY 2017 Improvement 9054 S. Calle Sahuaro rd 63 Street and Broadway Road Extension Road and 2 nd Avenue Solomon and Southern Avenue th 47 Avenue and Paradise Lane th th Osborn Road Storm Drain 48 and 49 Streets st Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects (F699) Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. In accordance with Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) Resolution 2009R003A, the District prioritizes and funds potential local flood control capital projects through its annual Small Project Assistance Program. The Small Project Assistance Program has three purposes: • • • Facilitate the mitigation of flood hazards that are local in nature but pose a risk to the citizens and property of Maricopa County. Using consistent, published criteria, objectively evaluate submitted local flood control capital projects requested by municipalities. Allow for the rapid implementation of recommended local flood control capital projects with minimal administrative delay. 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 9054 S. Calle Sahuaro (69D1) Project Partner: Town of Guadalupe Construct a concrete lined channel or add storm drain (approximately 150'), 2-3 catch basins and an additional 650' of storm drain. 63rd Street and Broadway Road (69D2) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert Excavate and construct a 20' x 600' gabion-lined channel, construct approximately 115 LF of 2' X 6' CBC and demo 2 existing driveways. Extension Road and 2nd Avenue (69D3) Project Partner: City of Mesa Construct storm line connection to existing Main Street storm drain system. Solomon and Southern Avenue (69D4) Project Partner: City of Mesa Construct storm drains, catch basin, storm line connection and storm drain manhole. 47th Avenue and Paradise Lane (69D5) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Design and reconstruct Sunburst Park (basin) and drywells. Osborn Road Storm Drain 48th and 49th Streets (69D6) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Design and construct Storm Drain along Osborn Road between 48th St. and 49th St. with catch basins. 51st Avenue Storm Drain (69D7) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Design and construct storm drain and connect to existing 72 inch Storm Drain in 51st Avenue. Sherwood Heights Detention Basin (69D8) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale Construct detention basin, inlet and outlet works. 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Floodprone Property Acquisition Program Managing Department: Project Description: Flood Control District See Project Description Project Descriptions: Unallocated Floodprone Acquisition Program (F700) Project Partner: N/A In many areas development took place prior to floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary sale to the Flood Control District of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Adopt the Library District FY 2017 Budget in the amount of $26,283,450 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Library District, listed in the attached schedules. This amount represents an $8,500 increase from the FY 2017 Tentative Budget of $26,274,950. 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Clint Hickman, Chairman, District 4 Denny Barney, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andy Kunasek, District 3 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The Library District FY 2017 revenue budget is $26,283,450 and the expenditure budget is $26,283,450. The tax levy for FY 2017 will increase from $19,250,761 to $20,091,335 or 4.4%, an increase of $840,574 from FY 2016. The tax rate for FY 2017 will remain flat at $0.0556 per $100 of assessed value, while the net assessed value is increasing by $1,511,824,151 from FY 2016 to FY 2017. The Summer Reading Program continues to improve in numbers and software enhancements are delivering a literacy experience that facilitates a more interesting and enjoyable learning experience for at-risk children. Access to digital materials has remained a focus as demand increases exponentially. The Maricopa County Library District (MCLD) has responded with additional digital resources such as coding clubs and other innovative learning programs for all ages that resulted in the receipt of four 2015 NACO Awards. MCLD continues to provide vital access to information and technology, empowering people to thrive in the digital age. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2015 through FY 2017 $22,000,000 $20,000,000 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2015 Actual FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Joy Rich Maricopa County Manager On June 20, 2016, the Maricopa County Library District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2017 Budget totaling $26,283,450. There was an $8,500 change in total revenue and expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 15, 2016, the Maricopa County Board of Directors approved the FY 2017 Tax Levy and Rate. 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Anthem Parade Chairman Hickman at White Tanks Library Supervisor Gallardo at Guadalupe Library Supervisor Barney at Food for Fines Supervisor Chucri at Southeast Regional Library 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst and Carmine L. Davis, Management and Budget Supervisor Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to reading, exploring and discovering for all so they can be lifelong learners. Vision Maricopa County Library District aspires to be the vibrant community front porch, a destination where people exchange ideas, gain access, foster creativity and pursue knowledge. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2020, 88% of of customers surveyed will report that the library’s collections and services meet their needs, up from a 2015 baseline of 84%. Status: There has been a 1% increase year over year from 2014’s low of 82.9%. MLCD is on track to meet this goal by 2020. Government Operations By June 30, 2020, 90% of first and second grade participants in the summer reading program will retain or increase reading and comprehension skills over the summer, based on a 2015 baseline of 87%. Status: Goal was added in Fall of 2015. Summer Reading Program 2016 will be the first test against the baseline. 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,018,941 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 19,850,239 $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 408,485 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,130,700 FINES & FORFEITS 669,547 INTEREST EARNINGS 25,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 190,979 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 26,274,950 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ 7,000 $ 1,500 8,500 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 26,283,450 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 11,827,967 $ SUPPLIES 9,573,990 SERVICES 4,732,993 CAPITAL 140,000 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 26,274,950 $ NON-RECURRING SUPPLIES $ SERVICES OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 7,500 $ 1,000 2,018,941 2,027,441 $ TOTAL USES $ 28,302,391 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - $ SUBTOTAL 9,223,770 - $ 11,242,711 - $ - $ 19,850,239 $ 408,485 5,130,700 669,547 25,000 190,979 26,274,950 $ - $ $ 19,850,239 408,485 5,130,700 669,547 25,000 190,979 26,274,950 - $ 2,018,941 2,018,941 $ 7,000 $ 1,500 2,018,941 2,027,441 $ - $ (2,018,941) (2,018,941) $ 7,000 1,500 8,500 (2,018,941) $ 26,283,450 $ 11,242,711 28,302,391 $ - $ - $ 11,827,967 $ 9,573,990 4,732,993 140,000 26,274,950 $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 1,000 2,018,941 2,027,441 $ - $ 28,302,391 $ $ 11,242,711 $ 11,242,711 $ 54 TOTAL $ 2,018,941 $ ELIMINATIONS - $ 11,827,967 9,573,990 4,732,993 140,000 26,274,950 - $ (2,018,941) (2,018,941) $ 7,500 1,000 8,500 (2,018,941) $ 26,283,450 - $ $ 11,242,711 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2017 ADOPTED $ 20,710,145 4,448,803 $ 25,158,948 $ 20,721,886 4,463,248 $ 25,185,134 $ 21,631,223 2,020,441 $ 23,651,664 $ $ - $ 55,612 $ 7,000 $ 48,612 $ 4,579,574 415,931 4,995,505 $ 4,579,574 415,931 4,995,505 $ 4,643,727 4,643,727 $ (64,153) 415,931 351,778 $ $ $ $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ $ 29,489,719 55 $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ $ 29,571,517 (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ $ (2,018,941) $ (2,018,941) $ $ 26,283,450 $ (909,337) 2,442,807 1,533,470 1,354,207 1,354,207 3,288,067 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $26,283,450 Fund Balance $0% Intergovernmental & Grants $5,137,700 19% Miscellaneous & Interest $217,479 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $669,547 3% Property Taxes $20,258,724 77% Uses of Funds $26,283,450 Information Technology $2,912,248 11% Administrative Services $3,205,034 12% Public Library Service $20,166,168 77% 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2015 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH MUNI - SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 5,754,077 $ 5,754,077 $ 5,888,276 $ 5,888,276 $ 5,955,629 $ 14,445 5,970,074 $ 6,143,231 $ 14,445 6,157,676 $ 5,999,726 $ 5,999,726 $ 44,097 (14,445) 29,652 0.7% -100.0% 0.5% SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ 26,805 $ 26,805 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 22,338 $ 22,338 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 7,000 7,000 38.9% 38.9% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 19,681,131 $ 19,681,131 $ 19,441,337 $ 19,441,337 $ 19,441,337 $ 19,441,337 $ 19,491,341 $ 19,491,341 $ 20,258,724 $ 20,258,724 $ 817,387 817,387 4.2% 4.2% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 25,462,013 $ 25,347,613 $ 25,429,411 $ 25,671,355 $ 26,283,450 $ 854,039 3.4% 14,708,657 $ 4,393,688 19,102,345 $ 14,962,787 $ 4,718,043 19,680,830 $ 15,161,949 $ 4,747,762 19,909,711 $ 14,924,304 $ 4,890,813 19,815,117 $ 15,398,113 $ 4,768,055 20,166,168 $ (236,164) (20,293) (256,457) -1.6% -0.4% -1.3% - $ 1,053,917 1,053,917 $ 177,207 $ 1,198,691 1,375,898 $ - $ 1,226,794 1,226,794 $ - $ 1,226,085 1,226,085 $ 225,197 $ 1,283,818 1,509,015 $ (225,197) (57,024) (282,221) N/A -4.6% -23.0% 1,181,576 $ 4,200,000 172,525 107,643 5,661,744 $ 1,181,576 $ 4,200,000 177,980 107,643 5,667,199 $ 1,181,575 $ 4,030,498 177,062 170,433 5,559,568 $ 1,432,014 $ 178,192 85,813 1,696,019 $ (250,438) 4,200,000 (212) 21,830 3,971,180 -21.2% 100.0% -0.1% 20.3% 70.1% (144,435) (144,435) -5.2% -5.2% USES MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH MUNI - SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ POOL - POOLED COSTS SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT MPOS - ELECTED OR STATUTORY OFFICIALS RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 1,149,371 $ 182,035 98,388 1,429,794 $ TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 1,987,262 $ 1,987,262 $ 2,771,247 $ 2,771,247 $ 2,767,813 $ 2,767,813 $ 2,846,813 $ 2,846,813 $ 2,912,248 $ 2,912,248 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 23,573,318 $ 29,489,719 $ 29,571,517 $ 29,447,583 $ 26,283,450 $ $ 3,288,067 11.1% Sources and Uses by Category FY 2015 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ $ 19,019,752 $ 19,019,752 $ 19,019,752 19,019,752 FY 2016 FORECAST $ $ $ $ 19,850,239 $ 19,850,239 $ 830,487 830,487 7,000 408,485 415,485 $ (27,075) (13,100) (40,175) $ $ 5,130,700 5,130,700 $ $ 66,314 66,314 1.3% 1.3% 5,064,386 5,064,386 $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 720,826 $ 720,826 $ 689,740 689,740 $ $ 689,739 $ 689,739 $ 670,890 $ 670,890 $ 669,547 669,547 $ $ (20,192) (20,192) -2.9% -2.9% $ 72,861 $ 483,875 556,736 $ 18,000 134,150 152,150 $ 18,000 $ 181,874 199,874 $ 47,342 $ 413,608 460,950 $ 25,000 192,479 217,479 $ $ 7,000 10,605 17,605 38.9% 5.8% 8.8% $ 5,064,386 5,064,386 $ $ 34,075 $ 421,585 455,660 $ 5,064,103 5,064,103 $ 4.4% 4.4% $ $ 4,390,122 4,390,122 $ 34,075 $ 421,585 455,660 $ 19,019,752 19,019,752 REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2017 ADOPTED $ SUBTOTAL $ 200,738 $ 375,194 575,932 $ FY 2016 REVISED 421,585 421,585 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS 19,218,397 19,218,397 FY 2016 ADOPTED -79.5% -3.1% -8.8% ALL REVENUES $ 25,462,013 $ 25,347,613 $ 25,429,411 $ 25,671,355 $ 26,283,450 $ 854,039 3.4% TOTAL SOURCES $ 25,462,013 $ 25,347,613 $ 25,429,411 $ 25,671,355 $ 26,283,450 $ 854,039 3.4% 57 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2017 ADOPTED 7,055,092 $ 1,044,542 948 2,851,468 10,335 (28,200) 115,686 11,049,871 $ 7,522,176 $ 1,183,846 6,500 3,255,467 400 (356,388) 440,135 12,052,136 $ 7,496,209 $ 1,079,098 3,262,794 130,288 (400,865) 484,612 12,052,136 $ 7,127,538 $ 1,028,869 450 3,131,628 288 (401,175) 484,612 11,372,210 $ 7,288,813 $ 1,097,002 3,441,752 400 (433,932) 433,932 11,827,967 $ 207,396 (17,904) (178,958) 129,888 33,067 50,680 224,169 2.8% -1.7% N/A -5.5% 99.7% 8.2% 10.5% 1.9% 8,268,732 $ 8,599 403,465 227 8,681,023 $ 8,731,759 $ 10,000 314,000 (2,106) 2,790 9,056,443 $ 8,813,557 $ 10,000 314,000 (2,106) 2,790 9,138,241 $ 9,287,276 $ 8,832 413,257 (2,574) 3,258 9,710,049 $ 9,170,055 $ 10,000 401,435 (2,574) 2,574 9,581,490 $ (356,498) (87,435) 468 216 (443,249) -4.0% 0.0% -27.8% 22.2% 7.7% -4.9% 781,123 $ 455,260 600,183 1,192,712 3,626 44,221 15,673 227,476 511,450 3,831,724 $ 833,945 $ 442,720 713,935 5,422,462 45,648 75,848 245,980 568,145 (12,312) 14,769 8,351,140 $ 833,945 $ 442,720 713,935 5,422,462 45,648 75,848 245,980 568,145 (12,312) 14,769 8,351,140 $ 864,408 $ 474,522 744,620 5,259,168 17,524 63,740 112,517 221,813 565,391 (13,908) 17,505 8,327,300 $ 1,184,864 $ 472,841 657,318 1,474,339 45,648 75,848 246,480 576,655 (13,512) 13,512 4,733,993 $ (350,919) (30,121) 56,617 3,948,123 (500) (8,510) 1,200 1,257 3,617,147 -42.1% -6.8% 7.9% 72.8% N/A 0.0% 0.0% -0.2% -1.5% 9.7% 8.5% 43.3% $ 10,700 $ 10,700 $ - $ 30,000 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 30,000 $ 11,769 $ 26,255 38,024 $ 110,000 $ 30,000 140,000 $ (110,000) (110,000) N/A 0.0% -366.7% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 23,573,318 $ 29,489,719 $ 29,571,517 $ 29,447,583 $ 26,283,450 $ 3,288,067 11.1% TOTAL USES $ 23,573,318 $ 29,489,719 $ 29,571,517 $ 29,447,583 $ 26,283,450 $ 3,288,067 11.1% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP SUBTOTAL $ $ $ Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2015 ACTUAL $ FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 141,484 $ 59,254 200,738 $ - $ - $ - $ 55,612 55,612 $ - $ 55,612 55,612 $ - $ 7,000 7,000 $ (48,612) (48,612) N/A -87.4% -87.4% SOURCES $ 21,129,408 $ 21,129,408 $ 20,768,039 $ 20,768,039 $ 20,779,780 $ 14,445 20,794,225 $ 20,996,720 $ 14,445 21,011,165 $ 21,631,223 $ 1,500 21,632,723 $ 851,443 (12,945) 838,498 4.1% -89.6% 4.0% $ SOURCES $ 4,530,161 $ 4,530,161 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,643,727 $ 4,643,727 $ 64,153 64,153 1.4% 1.4% $ 20,811 $ 25,245 46,056 $ - $ 664,734 664,734 $ - $ 664,734 664,734 $ - $ 273,807 273,807 $ - $ 2,018,941 2,018,941 $ 1,354,207 1,354,207 N/A 203.7% 203.7% SOURCES $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ - $ (248,803) (248,803) $ - $ (2,018,941) (2,018,941) $ (1,354,207) (1,354,207) N/A 203.7% 203.7% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 25,377,514 $ 84,499 $ 25,462,013 $ 25,347,613 $ - $ 25,347,613 $ 25,359,354 $ 70,057 $ 25,429,411 $ 25,576,294 $ 95,061 $ 25,671,355 $ 26,274,950 $ 8,500 $ 26,283,450 $ 915,596 (61,557) 854,039 3.6% -87.9% 3.4% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 200,738 $ 200,738 $ - $ - $ 55,612 $ 55,612 $ 55,612 $ 55,612 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ $ 19,302,042 $ 19,302,042 $ 20,710,145 $ 4,448,803 25,158,948 $ 20,721,886 $ 4,463,248 25,185,134 $ 20,597,952 $ 4,463,248 25,061,200 $ 21,631,223 $ 2,020,441 23,651,664 $ (909,337) 2,442,807 1,533,470 -4.4% 54.7% 6.1% 4,514,888 $ 4,514,888 $ 4,579,574 $ 415,931 4,995,505 $ 4,579,574 $ 415,931 4,995,505 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,643,727 $ 4,643,727 $ (64,153) 415,931 351,778 -1.4% 100.0% 7.0% FUND TOTAL USES $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ - $ (248,803) (248,803) $ - $ (2,018,941) (2,018,941) $ 1,354,207 1,354,207 DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 23,372,580 $ 200,738 $ 23,573,318 $ 25,289,719 $ 4,200,000 $ 29,489,719 $ 25,301,460 $ 4,270,057 $ 29,571,517 $ 25,177,526 $ 4,270,057 $ 29,447,583 $ 26,274,950 $ 8,500 $ 26,283,450 $ (973,490) 4,261,557 3,288,067 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 48,612 48,612 87.4% 87.4% N/A -203.7% -203.7% -3.8% 99.8% 11.1% Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 Non-Recurring $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 Non-Recurring $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 ELIMINATIONS $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ (248,803) $ (2,018,941) Non-Recurring $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ (248,803) $ (2,018,941) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 59 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 Non-Recurring $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 248,803 $ 248,803 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 Non-Recurring $ 248,803 $ 248,803 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 415,931 $ 415,931 $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 415,931 $ 415,931 $ - $ - $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 664,734 $ 664,734 $ 248,803 $ 2,018,941 ELIMINATIONS $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ (248,803) $ (2,018,941) Non-Recurring $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ (248,803) $ (2,018,941) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTED OR STATUTORY OFFICIALS PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 12.00 12.00 11.45 11.45 10.95 10.95 10.95 10.95 11.95 11.95 1.00 1.00 9.1% 9.1% 14.00 14.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 137.73 137.73 164.73 135.61 2.67 138.28 163.73 136.01 2.77 138.78 163.73 136.01 2.77 138.78 163.73 136.01 2.77 138.78 164.73 1.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Administrative Supervisor Communications Department Ofcr Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Department Facilities Planner Deputy Director - Library Director - Library Executive Assistant Finance Manager Finance Support Supervisor Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Associate Human Resources Manager Human Resources Specialist IT Division Manager IT Services Supv Librarian Library Administrator Library Branch Services Supervisor Library Clerk Library Large Branch Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Region Manager Library Services Manager Library Small Branch Manager Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized PC/LAN Technician Systems Administrator Trades Generalist Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer - Senior/Lead Department Total FY 2015 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.00 3.00 47.49 12.00 1.24 18.00 4.00 10.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 164.73 FY 2016 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.00 3.00 48.49 11.00 1.24 20.00 7.00 9.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 163.73 FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.00 33.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 48.49 48.49 9.00 9.00 1.24 1.24 18.00 18.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 163.73 163.73 FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 33.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 48.49 0.0% 9.00 0.0% 1.24 0.0% 18.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A 6.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 164.73 1.00 0.6% FY 2015 ADOPTED 116.73 48.00 164.73 FY 2016 ADOPTED 116.73 47.00 163.73 FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 117.73 116.73 46.00 47.00 163.73 163.73 FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 117.73 0.0% 47.00 1.00 2.2% 164.73 1.00 0.6% Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Department Total Staffing Variance Analysis The Library District is hiring a Communications Officer to enhance the customer experience and initiate community engagement. This position will create, implement, and measure the effectiveness of short and long range strategic activities and operating plans for the District’s communication, advertising and development. The Communication Officer will develop strategic marketing campaigns designed to increase public awareness of the Maricopa County Library District programs and services and cultivate positive relationships with civic and community leaders. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District General Adjustments Base Adjustments: Library District Grants Fund (242) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget of $ includes: o $1,000 revenue and expenditures for the Thinking Money Program grant. o $6,000 revenue and expenditures for the State Library Services & Technology Act Grant from the American Library Association and FINRA Investor Education Foundation. Library District Fund (244) Operating • Increase Revenue by $45,797 for Donations. • Increase Revenue by $830,487 for Property Taxes. • Decrease Revenue by $13,100 for Payments in Lieu of Taxes. • Increase Regular Benefits by $157,599 for the impact of changes in health/dental premium rates. • Increase Personnel Benefits Savings by $2,673 for the vacancy factor applied to the impact of the changes in health/dental and retirement rates. • Increase Regular Benefits by $582 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $250,438 for the increase in Central Services Cost Allocation. • Increase Supplies by $331,525 for Virtual Branch library materials. • Increase Services by $219,857 for Polaris software updates. • Decrease Internal Service Charges by $21,830 for the impact of the changes in risk management charges. • Increase Personnel Savings by $14,420, from 1.58% to 2.66%. Library District Fund (244) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget of $2,020,441 includes: o $2,018,941 Transfer to Capital Project Fund. o $1,500 revenue and expenditures as a donation from The Friends of the Litchfield Park Branch Library. Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Operating • Increase Revenue by $64,153 for the increase in Intergovernmental Agreements. • Increase Regular Benefits by $62,644 for the changes in health/dental premium rates. • Increase Personnel Benefits Savings by $911 for the vacancy factor applied to the impact of the changes in health/dental and retirement rates. • Increase Regular Benefits by $187 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase in Supplies and Services by $90,985 for library materials. • Increase in Personnel Savings by $88,752, from 3.76% to 5.61%. Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Non Recurring Non Project • FY 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget of $2,018,941 includes: o $2,018,941 Transfer to Capital Project Fund. 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered FY 2015 ACTUAL 54.0% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 48.6% 54.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 55.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 6.4% 13.2% 93.7% 87.7% 85.3% 86.0% (1.7%) -1.9% 92.1% 91.8% 92.8% 93.8% 2.0% 2.2% Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: Discretionary services. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Number of items circulated Number of programs and activities provided Number of digital materials accessed Number of website visits Number of items requested to be circulated Number of digital materials requested to be accessed Total expenditure per item circulated Library District FY 2015 ACTUAL 54.0% FY 2016 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST 48.6% 54.0% FY 2017 ADOPTED 55.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 6.4% 13.2% 93.7% 87.7% 85.3% 86.0% (1.7%) -1.9% 92.1% 91.8% 92.8% 93.8% 2.0% 2.2% (300,000) 1,000 400,000 85,000 (300,000) 400,000 -3.8% 18.2% 40.0% 2.3% -3.8% 40.0% 7,476,306 6,068 1,151,715 3,487,932 7,500,000 1,250,000 8,000,000 5,500 1,000,000 3,715,000 8,000,000 1,000,000 7,700,000 6,200 1,250,000 3,310,332 7,700,000 1,250,000 7,700,000 6,500 1,400,000 3,800,000 7,700,000 1,400,000 $ 1.97 $ 1.90 $ 1.94 $ 2.00 $ (0.10) -5.5% Total expenditure per digital material accessed $ 12.77 $ 15.16 $ 11.94 $ 11.00 $ 4.16 27.5% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 159,254 $ 55,612 $ 30,612 $ 7,000 $ (48,612) 1,509,012 1,320,443 1,533,045 1,348,999 28,556 4,530,161 4,579,574 4,579,574 4,643,727 64,153 664,734 248,803 2,018,941 1,354,207 (444,350) (664,734) (248,803) (2,018,941) (1,354,207) $ 5,754,077 $ 5,955,629 $ 6,143,231 $ 5,999,726 $ 44,097 -87.4% 2.2% 1.4% 203.7% 203.7% 0.7% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 87.4% -18.5% 7.0% -203.7% -1.6% Expenditure 200,738 $ 55,612 $ 55,612 $ 7,000 $ 48,612 10,437,381 10,775,566 10,537,921 12,766,327 (1,990,761) 4,514,888 4,995,505 4,579,574 4,643,727 351,778 (444,350) (664,734) (248,803) (2,018,941) 1,354,207 $ 14,708,657 $ 15,161,949 $ 14,924,304 $ 15,398,113 $ (236,164) Activity Narrative: The Demand for “the number of items customers requested to be circulated” in the FY 2016 Revised Budget was overly ambitious and has been adjusted for the FY 2016 Forecast and FY 2017 Recommended Budget to be more in line with actual performance. The Library District is attempting to incrementaly increase all three result measure percentages beginning in FY 2017 by continually listening to customers and reallocating resources as necessary to meet their needs. 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Beginning in FY 2016 for Tax Year 2015, the Library District secondary property tax will no longer assess property valuation based on full cash value, but instead on limited property value and will have a growth cap of 5% on property taxed in the prior year. This change in property tax collections is due to a voter approved Proposition 117 that was approved in 2012. Previously, secondary net assessed values of real and personal property had no constitutional limitation on growth. The Library District Board of Directors chose to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy resulting in a 2% cap annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2017. The tax levy will increase from FY 2016 to FY 2017. The Library District’s property tax rate for FY 2017 will remain flat at $0.0556 per $100 net assessed value. Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 49,534,573 58,303,635 57,984,051 49,707,952 38,760,297 34,400,455 32,229,007 37,616,986 34,623,670 36,135,494 Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.0391 0.0353 0.0353 0.0412 0.0492 0.0492 0.0438 0.0556 0.0556 0.0556 Tax Levy 19,368,018 20,581,183 20,468,370 20,479,676 19,070,066 16,925,024 14,116,305 19,504,284 19,250,761 20,091,335 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Fiscal Year The FY 2017 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $20,091,335, an increase of $840,574 from the FY 2016 Adopted Levy. 65 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District FY 2017 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES LIBRARY DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY: FY 2017 Adopted FY 2016 Adopted FY 2017 Variance $ $ 36,135,494,474 34,623,670,323 1,511,824,151 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP 734,685,173 758,245,769 (23,560,596) $ Revenue from 1-cent Levy 36,870,179,647 35,381,916,092 1,488,263,555 $ 3,687,018 3,538,192 148,826 $ SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Tax Rates 0.0556 0.0556 $ 20,091,335 19,250,761 840,574 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 408,485 421,585 (13,100) $ Levy Limit FY 2017 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2017 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 28,185,686 0.0780 FY 2017 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 20,091,335 0.0556 Amount Under Limit: $ 8,094,351 28.7% 0.0224 FY 2017 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" TOTAL LEVY FY 2017 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 19,693,844 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0545 FY 2017 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 20,091,335 0.0556 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ (397,491) (0.0011) FY 2017 Median Residential Limited Property Value $ 121,100 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 66 $ 6.60 6.73 (0.13) -2.0% -2.0% 20,499,820 19,672,346 827,474 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2017 vs. FY 2016 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2016: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2017: Median Residential Limited Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ $ $ 116,078 0.0556 6.45 121,100 0.0556 6.73 $ (0.28) -4.3% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2017 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2017. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2017 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 20,091,335 $ 19,850,239 Rate 98.8% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. 67 SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011 269,405 2012 327,394 2013 329,011 2014 296,957 2015 377,686 2016* 421,585 2017** 408,485 * Forecast ** Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2016 FY 2017 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library $ 1,025,985 $ 1,004,890 Surprise/Hollyhock 1,852,860 1,903,000 Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) 26,855 22,600 Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library 2,158,686 2,200,210 TOTAL $ 5,064,386 $ 5,130,700 Fines and Forfeits Fines and Forfeits The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2015, the anticipated amount for FY 2016 and the budget for FY 2017. The Food for Fines program decreased revenue significantly from FY 2015 to FY 2016. $730,000 $720,000 $710,000 $700,000 $690,000 $680,000 $670,000 $660,000 $650,000 $640,000 Miscellaneous Revenue FY 2015 Actual The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2015 through the FY 2017 budget. The FY 2017 Miscellaneous Revenues are significantly less than those budgeted for FY 2016 due to a decrease in donations. FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget Miscellaneous Revenue $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $FY 2015 Actual FY 2016 Forecast FY 2017 Budget Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. 68 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Balance Summary Library District Operating Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ 55,612 55,612 $ $ 55,612 55,612 $ $ - $ 7,000 7,000 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 141,484 59,254 200,738 Uses: Structural Balance $ 141,484 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED $ 4,226,352 $ 4,390,909 $ 4,390,909 $ 6,068,976 $ 2,018,941 $ 21,129,408 21,129,408 $ 20,768,039 20,768,039 $ 20,779,780 14,445 20,794,225 $ 20,996,720 14,445 21,011,165 $ 21,631,223 1,500 21,632,723 $ $ $ 20,597,952 4,463,248 25,061,200 $ $ 20,721,886 4,463,248 25,185,134 $ $ 20,710,145 4,448,803 25,158,948 $ 21,631,223 2,020,441 23,651,664 $ $ $ $ $ Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 19,302,042 19,302,042 Structural Balance $ 1,827,366 $ 57,894 $ 57,894 $ 398,768 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 15,258 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 6,068,976 6,068,976 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 2,018,941 2,018,941 $ $ - $ 69 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ 415,931 $ 415,931 $ - $ - Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,530,161 4,530,161 $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,643,727 4,643,727 $ $ $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,579,574 415,931 4,995,505 $ $ 4,579,574 415,931 4,995,505 $ 4,643,727 4,643,727 $ - $ - $ - $ - (15,273) $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ - $ - Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 4,514,888 4,514,888 Structural Balance $ 15,273 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED $ 8,903,907 $ 8,925,007 $ 8,925,007 $ 8,949,963 $ 9,223,770 $ $ $ 273,807 273,807 $ $ 664,734 664,734 $ $ 664,734 664,734 $ $ 20,811 25,245 46,056 $ 2,018,941 2,018,941 Uses: Structural Balance $ 20,811 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 8,949,963 8,949,963 $ $ 9,589,741 9,589,741 $ $ 9,589,741 9,589,741 $ $ 9,223,770 9,223,770 $ $ 11,242,711 11,242,711 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ - $ - $ 55,612 $ 9,075 25,000 21,537 55,612 9,075 25,000 21,537 $ 55,612 $ 55,612 $ (55,612) $ (9,075) (25,000) (21,537) (55,612) (9,075) (25,000) (21,537) FY 2017 Baseline Budget $ - $ - FY 2017 Tentative Budget $ - $ - $ 7,000 $ 1,000 6,000 7,000 1,000 6,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Adjustments: Grants AZ State Lib Serv & Archiv AZ State Lib Serv & Archiv Library District Grant Recon Agenda Item: C-65-15-025-M-00 C-65-16-005-M-00 C-65-16-019-M-00 FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants AZ State Lib Serv & Archiv AZ State Lib Serv & Archiv Library District Grant Recon Adjustments: Grants Think ing Money Prog Grant Grant Reconciliation State Library Services & Technology Act Grant from the American Library Association and FINRA Investor Education Foundation Agenda Item: C-65-15-025-M-00 C-65-16-005-M-00 C-65-16-019-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-16-023-M-00 $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget 71 6,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Donations Friends of Libr Sun City Friends of Libr Fountain Hills Friends of Libr Queen Creek Robert Joseph Berk es Dontation 20,768,039 $ 11,741 $ 2,089 1,377 806 7,469 11,741 2,089 1,377 806 7,469 $ 20,721,886 $ 20,779,780 $ (11,741) $ (2,089) (1,377) (806) (7,469) $ 20,710,145 $ 20,768,039 $ 155,508 $ 157,599 (2,673) 582 765,570 $ 801,820 - (21,830) (14,420) - C-65-16-004-D-00 C-65-16-006-D-00 C-65-16-007-D-00 C-65-16-013-D-00 Agenda Item: C-65-16-004-D-00 C-65-16-006-D-00 C-65-16-007-D-00 C-65-16-013-D-00 FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Vacancy Savings Assoc with Benefit Adjustments Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Base Adjustment Increases Increase Central Services Cost Allocation Increase Supplies for Virtual Branch Library Materials Increase Services for Polaris Software Updates Risk Management Adjustment Personnel Savings From 1.58% to 2.66% Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes 20,710,145 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Donations Friends of Libr Sun City Friends of Libr Fountain Hills Friends of Libr Queen Creek Robert Joseph Berk es Dontation $ (11,741) (2,089) (1,377) (806) (7,469) Agenda Item: $ $ $ 250,438 331,525 219,857 (14,420) $ $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 72 - $ - $ - 45,797 45,797 817,387 (13,100) 830,487 21,631,223 $ 4.4% 21,631,223 4.2% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Donations Friends of Libr Queen Creek Br Friends of Libr Fountain Hills - $ 14,445 $ 12,450 1,995 14,445 12,450 1,995 $ 4,463,248 $ 14,445 $ (248,803) $ (248,803) (14,445) $ (12,450) (1,995) (4,200,000) $ (4,200,000) (14,445) (12,450) (1,995) - C-65-16-008-D-00 C-65-16-009-D-00 Agenda Item: $ C-65-16-008-D-00 C-65-16-009-D-00 $ FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund 4,448,803 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Donations Friends of Libr Queen Creek Br Friends of Libr Fountain Hills Other Mandates State Contribution $ $ - $ - $ 2,018,941 $ 2,018,941 - $ 2,018,941 $ - $ 1,500 $ 1,500 1,500 1,500 $ 2,020,441 $ 1,500 Agenda Item: FY 2017 Tentative Budget Adjustments: Agenda Item: Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Donation from the Friends of The Litchfield Park Branch Library $ 1,500 FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 FY 2017 Baseline Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 61,920 $ 62,644 (911) 187 2,233 $ 90,985 - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Vacancy Savings Assoc with Benefit Adjustments Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Increase Supplies and Other Services Personnel Savings From 3.76% to 5.61% Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA Agenda Item: $ $ 90,985 $ (88,752) (88,752) FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount 73 - $ - $ - 64,153 64,153 $ 4,643,727 $ 1.4% 4,643,727 1.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ - $ 664,734 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ - $ 664,734 $ - $ - (664,734) (664,734) $ - $ - $ - $ - 2,018,941 2,018,941 $ - $ 2,018,941 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ (664,734) $ (664,734) FY 2016 Revised Budget $ (664,734) $ (664,734) $ 664,734 $ 664,734 - 664,734 664,734 $ - $ - $ (2,018,941) $ (2,018,941) (2,018,941) (2,018,941) $ (2,018,941) $ (2,018,941) Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Non Recurring Fund Transfer R Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Approve the Stadium District Fiscal Year 2017 Budget in the amount of $10,639,898 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Stadium District. This amount represents no change from the Fiscal Year 2017 Tentative Budget of $10,639,898. 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District 76 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Clint Hickman, Chairman, District 4 Denny Barney, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The Stadium District’s recommended expenditure budget for FY 2017 is $10,639,898 and the recommended revenue budget is $10,620,908. Chase Field is now entering its 19th season of baseball. The District completed Phase V of the Concrete and Structural Repair project in FY 2016. The Concrete and Structural project is projected to be an ongoing, multi-year effort based on objective findings from the Facility Assessment Study (conducted every two years) and annual observation and investigation. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue $5,400,000 On August 1, 2012, the District issued Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 in the amount of $25,140,000 (par $5,000,000 value) with an interest rate of 2.28%. The District paid $3,325,000 towards $4,800,000 the FY 2015 outstanding balance of $4,600,000 $16,010,000; leaving a balance of $12,685,000 for FY 2016. The District $4,400,000 will pay $3,405,000 towards principal in FY13 FY15 FY16 FY14 FY17 Actual Actual Actual Forecast Adopted FY 2017, leaving a balance of $9,280,000. The Bonds are scheduled to be paid off in June 2019. $5,200,000 In FY 2015, $1,230,178 of excess car rental surcharge revenue was remitted to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA). It is expected that excess car rental surcharge revenue will continue to be available for remittance to AZSTA in FY 2016 and 2017. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Joy Rich Maricopa County Manager On June 20, 2016, the Stadium District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2017 Budget totaling $10,639,898. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Chase Field 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Kimberly D. Tolbert, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 2017, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 5% from 80% to 85% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: It is anticipated that routine maintenance will be approximately 83% for FY 2016 and the goal of 85% will be met in FY 2017. Department Specific By June 2017, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 3% from 168 to 173 non-baseball events. Status: There are 220 non-baseball District events scheduled for FY 2016. It is anticipated that the goal of 173 non-baseball events will be met in FY 2017. Department Specific By June, 2017, the District will increase facility revenue by 3%, from $627,509 to $646,334, for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: Revenue from non-baseball events is scheduled to be $650,000 for FY 2016 and FY 2017 in accordance with the Booking Manager Contract. 79 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type BEGINNING FUND BALANCE SPECIAL REVENUE DEBT SERVICE $ 12,345,132 $ 4,275,051 SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES - TOTAL SOURCES $ 6,164,895 NON-RECURRING SUPPLIES $ SERVICES OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ $ 1,319,391 $ 3,705,468 $ 3,574,876 1,236,628 34,000 345 6,164,895 $ 3,705,813 $ $ $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 7,995,979 SUBTOTAL $ 24,616,162 5,024,959 $ 3,574,876 1,236,628 34,445 750,000 1,521,643 12,142,551 $ - $ (1,521,643) (1,521,643) $ 5,024,959 3,574,876 1,236,628 34,445 750,000 10,620,908 2,555,000 $ 2,555,000 $ (2,555,000) $ (2,555,000) $ - $ (4,076,643) $ 10,620,908 - $ 3,000 3,000 $ 424,972 $ 5,540 2,456,529 3,694,218 1,521,643 8,102,902 $ - $ (1,521,643) (1,521,643) $ 424,972 5,540 2,456,529 3,694,218 6,581,259 3,639 $ 4,055,000 2,555,000 6,613,639 $ - $ (2,555,000) (2,555,000) $ 3,639 4,055,000 4,058,639 (4,076,643) $ 10,639,898 - $ $ 2,555,000 2,555,000 $ $ $ 3,705,813 $ 4,826,843 $ 424,972 $ - $ 5,540 2,441,934 11,595 3,694,218 1,521,643 4,394,089 $ 3,705,813 $ 3,639 $ 2,555,000 2,558,639 $ - $ $ - $ 4,055,000 4,055,000 $ TOTAL USES $ 6,952,728 $ 3,705,813 $ 4,058,000 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 1,770,806 $ - $ 2,268,843 $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 11,557,299 $ 4,275,051 $ 8,764,822 $ 80 14,697,551 14,716,541 $ $ 4,039,649 $ 24,597,172 $ - TOTAL $ 100 $ 100 750,000 1,521,643 2,271,843 $ 24,616,162 ELIMINATIONS - $ 4,039,649 - $ 24,597,172 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2016 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING All Functions LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT FY 2016 REVISED FY 2017 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ $ 3,096,830 $ 3,306,432 $ 3,096,830 $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,558,639 $ 5,596,830 $ 5,806,432 $ 5,655,469 $ $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,705,813 $ $ 3,705,813 $ $ $ 3,000 $ 3,000 4,000,000 4,226,952 $ 4,003,000 $ 4,229,952 209,602 (58,639) 150,963 (4,190) (4,190) 3,000 $ 4,055,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 171,952 171,952 $ (1,385,778) $ (1,495,380) $ (1,521,643) $ (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (2,555,000) $ (3,885,778) $ (3,995,380) $ (4,076,643) $ 26,263 55,000 81,263 $ 10,712,934 $ 11,039,886 81 $10,639,898 $ 399,988 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $10,620,908 Interest $34,445 0.3% Miscellaneous $750,000 7.1% Charges for Services $1,236,628 11.6% Sales Taxes $5,024,959 47.3% Licenses and Permits $3,574,876 33.7% Uses of Funds $10,639,898 Administrative Services $310,612 2.9% Stadium Operations $5,331,818 50.1% Cactus League Support $4,997,468 47.0% 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2015 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES $ FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ 4,916,111 $ 5,436,820 10,352,931 $ 5,021,014 $ 5,484,439 10,505,453 $ 5,021,014 $ 5,484,439 10,505,453 $ 5,021,038 $ 5,553,781 10,574,819 $ 5,025,204 $ 5,561,604 10,586,808 $ 4,190 77,165 81,355 0.1% 1.4% 0.8% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ (30,186) $ (30,186) $ 34,100 $ 34,100 $ 34,100 $ 34,100 $ 38,987 $ 38,987 $ 34,100 $ 34,100 $ - 0.0% 0.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,322,745 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,613,806 $ 10,620,908 $ 81,355 0.8% $ 4,942,825 $ 3,325,831 8,268,656 $ 4,991,634 $ 5,369,386 10,361,020 $ 4,991,634 $ 5,707,323 10,698,957 $ 4,991,537 $ 5,590,915 10,582,452 $ 4,997,468 $ 5,331,731 10,329,199 $ (5,834) 375,592 369,758 -0.1% 6.6% 3.5% 54,775 $ 43,502 80,951 4,747 60,660 244,635 $ 56,914 $ 55,286 80,826 10,985 3,241 59,648 266,900 $ 56,914 $ 55,286 80,826 3,241 59,648 255,915 $ 58,635 $ 53,935 85,627 2,342 60,049 260,588 $ 57,836 $ 55,918 81,462 8,930 3,311 60,703 268,160 $ (922) (632) (636) (8,930) (70) (1,055) (12,245) -1.6% -1.1% -0.8% N/A -2.2% -1.8% -4.8% 79,504 $ 897 80,401 $ 79,504 $ 897 80,401 $ 79,508 $ 903 80,411 $ 33,713 $ 882 34,595 $ 45,791 15 45,806 57.6% N/A 1.7% 57.0% (3,331) (3,331) -72.2% -72.2% USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT POOL - POOLED COSTS PROC - PROCUREMENT SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 36,293 $ 8 1,008 37,309 $ TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 1,486 $ 1,486 $ 4,613 $ 4,613 $ 4,613 $ 4,613 $ 4,245 $ 4,245 $ 7,944 $ 7,944 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 8,552,086 $ 10,712,934 $ 11,039,886 $ 10,927,696 $ 10,639,898 $ $ 83 399,988 3.6% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2015 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % SUBTOTAL $ 4,915,705 4,915,705 $ 5,020,769 5,020,769 $ 5,020,769 5,020,769 $ 5,020,769 5,020,769 $ 5,024,959 5,024,959 $ 4,190 4,190 0.1% 0.1% $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,469,347 3,469,347 $ $ 3,499,163 3,499,163 $ $ 3,499,163 3,499,163 $ $ 3,521,556 3,521,556 $ $ 3,574,876 3,574,876 $ $ 75,713 75,713 2.2% 2.2% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,191,962 1,191,962 $ $ 1,235,176 1,235,176 $ $ 1,235,176 1,235,176 $ $ 1,259,779 1,259,779 $ $ 1,236,628 1,236,628 $ $ 1,452 1,452 0.1% 0.1% (29,644) $ 775,375 745,731 $ 34,445 750,000 784,445 $ 39,521 $ 772,181 811,702 $ 34,445 750,000 784,445 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81,355 0.8% LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ 34,445 $ 750,000 784,445 $ ALL REVENUES $ 10,322,745 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,613,806 $ 10,620,908 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,322,745 FY 2015 ACTUAL $ 10,539,553 $ FY 2016 ADOPTED 10,539,553 FY 2016 REVISED $ 10,613,806 FY 2016 FORECAST $ 10,620,908 FY 2017 ADOPTED $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 81,355 0.8% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 300,789 $ 5,277 94,426 (40,133) 17,070 377,429 $ 298,742 $ 9,772 5,000 101,526 (13,489) 17,146 418,697 $ 289,970 $ 9,772 5,000 99,313 (13,489) 17,146 407,712 $ 296,928 $ 4,081 5,000 98,636 (13,488) 17,056 408,213 $ 299,844 $ 9,772 5,300 106,918 (12,920) 16,058 424,972 $ (9,874) (300) (7,605) (569) 1,088 (17,260) -3.4% 0.0% -6.0% -7.7% -4.2% 6.3% -4.2% 1,119 $ 63 1,182 $ 5,485 $ 58 5,543 $ 5,485 $ 58 5,543 $ 2,741 $ 44 2,785 $ 5,485 $ 3,694 9,179 $ (3,636) (3,636) 0.0% N/A -6269.0% -65.6% 14,163 $ 2,040,400 2,908 1,951,183 460,957 4,341 152 41 58 10,077 4,484,280 $ 75,298 $ 1,948,059 3,000 4,001,000 555,910 4,950 8,400 276 875 733 6,598,501 $ 75,298 $ 2,059,044 3,000 4,001,000 555,910 4,950 8,400 276 875 733 6,709,486 $ 69,207 $ 1,956,908 2,921 4,001,000 562,516 5,766 5,100 141 379 825 6,604,763 $ 50,000 $ 1,876,730 3,000 4,056,000 510,609 4,950 8,400 276 875 689 6,511,529 $ 25,298 182,314 (55,000) 45,301 44 197,957 33.6% 8.9% 0.0% -1.4% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 3.0% $ - $ 3,689,128 67 3,689,195 $ - $ 3,690,028 165 3,690,193 $ 226,952 $ 3,690,028 165 3,917,145 $ 221,840 $ 3,690,028 67 3,911,935 $ - $ 3,694,218 3,694,218 $ 226,952 (4,190) 165 222,927 100.0% -0.1% 100.0% 5.7% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 8,552,086 $ 10,712,934 $ 11,039,886 $ 10,927,696 $ 10,639,898 $ 399,988 3.6% TOTAL USES $ 8,552,086 $ 10,712,934 $ 11,039,886 $ 10,927,696 $ 10,639,898 $ 399,988 3.6% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 1,339,819 $ 1,339,819 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,336,053 $ 1,336,053 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,333,391 $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ $ 4,642,718 $ 4,642,718 $ 4,754,339 $ 4,754,339 $ 4,754,339 $ 4,754,339 $ 4,803,560 $ 4,803,560 $ 4,831,504 $ 4,831,504 $ 77,165 77,165 1.6% 1.6% $ $ 3,564,658 $ 3,564,658 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,647 $ 3,701,647 $ 3,705,813 $ 3,705,813 $ 4,190 4,190 0.1% 0.1% $ 2,395,536 $ 2,395,536 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,500,000 4,635,978 $ 2,245,580 $ 2,500,000 4,745,580 $ 2,158,324 $ 2,500,000 4,658,324 $ 2,271,843 $ 2,555,000 4,826,843 $ 26,263 55,000 81,263 1.2% 2.2% 1.7% $ (1,619,986) $ (1,619,986) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ (1,495,380) $ (2,500,000) (3,995,380) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ (1,521,643) $ (2,555,000) (4,076,643) $ (26,263) (55,000) (81,263) 1.8% 2.2% 2.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,322,745 $ 10,322,745 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,539,553 $ 10,613,806 $ 10,613,806 $ 10,620,908 $ 10,620,908 $ 81,355 81,355 0.8% 0.8% FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL SOURCES 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING FUND TOTAL SOURCES 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL SOURCES 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL SOURCES FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING $ $ FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,255,492 $ 1,255,492 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,170 $ 1,297,170 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 3,271,951 $ 3,271,951 $ 3,096,830 $ 2,500,000 5,596,830 $ 3,306,432 $ 2,500,000 5,806,432 $ 3,090,349 $ 2,500,000 5,590,349 $ 3,096,830 $ 2,558,639 5,655,469 $ 209,602 (58,639) 150,963 6.3% -2.3% 2.6% $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 3,690,946 $ 3,690,946 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,615 $ 3,701,615 $ 3,705,813 $ 3,705,813 $ (4,190) (4,190) -0.1% -0.1% $ 2,500 $ 1,951,183 1,953,683 $ 3,000 $ 4,000,000 4,003,000 $ 3,000 $ 4,226,952 4,229,952 $ 2,500 $ 4,221,840 4,224,340 $ 3,000 $ 4,055,000 4,058,000 $ 171,952 171,952 0.0% 4.1% 4.1% FUND TOTAL USES $ (1,619,986) $ (1,619,986) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ (1,495,380) $ (2,500,000) (3,995,380) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ (1,521,643) $ (2,555,000) (4,076,643) $ 26,263 55,000 81,263 -1.8% -2.2% -2.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 6,600,903 $ 1,951,183 $ 8,552,086 $ 6,712,934 $ 4,000,000 $ 10,712,934 $ 6,812,934 $ 4,226,952 $ 11,039,886 $ 6,705,856 $ 4,221,840 $ 10,927,696 $ 6,581,259 $ 4,058,639 $ 10,639,898 $ 231,675 168,313 399,988 3.4% 4.0% 3.6% 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 85 - 0.0% 0.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS $ FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 $ 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (3,885,778) $ (3,995,380) $ (3,885,778) $ (4,076,643) Operating $ (1,385,778) $ (1,495,380) $ (1,385,778) $ (1,521,643) Non-Recurring $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ (2,555,000) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS - Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 $ 3,885,778 $ 3,995,380 $ 3,885,778 $ 4,076,643 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,495,380 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,521,643 Non-Recurring $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,555,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (3,885,778) $ (3,995,380) $ (3,885,778) $ (4,076,643) Operating $ (1,385,778) $ (1,495,380) $ (1,385,778) $ (1,521,643) Non-Recurring $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ (2,555,000) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 86 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .80 .50 .55 .70 .10 2.65 .70 .50 .55 .85 .05 2.65 .70 .50 .55 .85 .05 2.65 .70 .50 .55 .85 .05 2.65 .70 .50 .55 .85 .05 2.65 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2016 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2016 REVISED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2016 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2016 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2016 REVISED 5.00 5.00 FY 2016 FORECAST 5.00 5.00 FY 2017 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 5.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Facil Capital Project Mgr Finance/Business Analyst Management Assistant Office Assistant Department Total Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total General Adjustments Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating • Increase Regular Benefits by $6,550 for the impact of the changes in health/dental premium rates. • Increase Personnel Benefits Savings by $874 for the vacancy factor applied to the impact of the changes in health/dental and retirement rates. • Increase Regular Benefits by $33 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Decrease Services by $5,694. • Decrease Internal Service Charges by $15 for the impact of the changes in risk management charges. • Increase Revenues by $77,165 for the impact of additional payments from the Arizona Diamondbacks in compliance with multiple agreements and changes in other charges for services. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Non Recurring Non Project • The 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget of $2,558,639 includes: o Increase Supplies-Allocation In by $3,639 for Other IT Non Recurring expense for desktop replacement. o Increase Transfer Out by $2,555,000 to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non Recurring Non Project. 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Service (370) Operating • Increase Revenue by $4,190 for the impact of changes in Car Rental Surcharge in FY 2017. • Increase Debt Service expenditures by $4,190 in FY 2017. Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Operating • Increase revenue by $135,865. Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non Recurring Non Project • The Non Recurring Non Project budget includes: o Increase Transfer In by $2,555,000 from Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Non Recurring Non Project. o Increase expenditures by $4,000,000 for Phase VI of the Concrete and Structural Repair project and $55,000 for Chase Field Roof Power Wash. Eliminations Fund (900) Operating • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $135,865 to eliminate transfers between Ballpark Operations Fund (253) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Eliminations Fund (900) Non Recurring Non Project • The 2017 Non Recurring Non Project budget of ($2,555,000) includes: o Decrease revenue and expenditures by $2,555,000 to eliminate transfers between Ballpark Operations Fund (253) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year FY 2015 ACTUAL 84.4% FY 2016 REVISED 81.1% FY 2016 FORECAST 19.1% FY 2017 ADOPTED 85.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 3.9% 4.8% 77.4% 77.4% 77.4% 77.4% 0.0% 0.0% 28.9% 5.0% 28.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue REV VS ADOPTED Measure FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent change in economic benefit from 28.9% 5.0% 28.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cactus League over prior year Number of existing spring training facilities in 10 10 10 10 0.0% Maricopa County for the current fiscal year Number of existing and planned spring training 10 10 10 10 0.0% facilities for the current fiscal year $ 494,282.50 $ 499,163.40 $ 499,153.70 $ 499,746.80 $ (583.40) -0.1% Cost per existing spring training facility in Maricopa County for the current fiscal year 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE TOTAL SOURCES $ 1,351,453 3,564,658 $ 4,916,111 $ 1,319,391 3,701,623 $ 5,021,014 $ 1,319,391 3,701,647 $ 5,021,038 $ 1,319,391 3,705,813 $ 5,025,204 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE TOTAL USES $ 1,251,879 3,690,946 $ 4,942,825 $ 1,290,011 3,701,623 $ 4,991,634 $ 1,289,922 3,701,615 $ 4,991,537 $ 1,291,655 3,705,813 $ 4,997,468 $ $ 4,190 4,190 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% (1,644) (4,190) (5,834) -0.1% -0.1% -0.1% Expenditure $ $ Activity Narrative: The annual cost per spring training facility declined in FY 2015 due to a decrease in excess Car Rental Surcharge that was remitted to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA). The payment to AZSTA in FY 2015, in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement was $1,230,178. The debt service payment increased due to the net effect of an increase in principal and decrease in interest payments. Revenue collected for the Car Rental Surcharge is expected to increase based on historical results and forecasting tools. Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” 89 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Stadium District Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year Number of attendees at all events for the current fiscal year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year FY 2015 ACTUAL 84.4% FY 2016 REVISED 81.1% FY 2016 FORECAST 19.1% FY 2017 ADOPTED 85.0% 77.4% 77.4% 77.4% 77.4% 1,901 1,901 1,901 1,901 2,106,079 2,165,724 2,137,378 2,137,378 (28,346) -1.3% 2,165,724 2,165,724 2,137,378 2,137,378 (28,346) -1.3% $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 4,661,309 $ 4,734,339 $ 4,781,335 $ 4,811,504 $ 2,395,497 4,745,480 4,658,224 4,826,743 (1,619,986) (3,995,380) (3,885,778) (4,076,643) $ 5,436,820 $ 5,484,439 $ 5,553,781 $ 5,561,604 $ 77,165 81,263 (81,263) 77,165 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 1.4% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 2,992,134 $ 5,472,751 $ 5,252,353 $ 5,350,374 $ 1,953,683 4,229,952 4,224,340 4,058,000 (1,619,986) (3,995,380) (3,885,778) (4,076,643) $ 3,325,831 $ 5,707,323 $ 5,590,915 $ 5,331,731 $ 122,377 171,952 81,263 375,592 2.2% 4.1% -2.0% 6.6% 1.58 $ 2.64 $ 2.62 $ 2.49 REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 3.9% 4.8% 0.0% - $ 0.14 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% Expenditure Activity Narrative: It is estimated that there will be a slight increase in routine maintenance items completed on time. The number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year is expected to decrease in FY 2017. The results of the survey that was conducted in 2015 by the Arizona Diamondbacks showed that customer satisfaction remained the same. The decrease in attendance would be due to historical data and forecasting tools. Increase in revenue results from agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks in FY 2016. The District is working with the Arizona Diamondbacks and facility assessment to determine the amount for non-recurring major maintenance and/or capital projects. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax Stadium District Car Rental Surcharge Fiscal Annual Growth Year Collections Rate 2007-08 6,132,645 -2.5% 2008-09 5,304,567 -13.5% 2009-10 4,668,575 -12.0% 2010-11 4,988,266 6.8% 2011-12 5,191,683 4.1% 2012-13 5,217,412 0.5% 2013-14 5,394,707 3.4% 2014-15 4,915,705 -8.9% 2015-16* 5,020,769 2.1% 2016-17** 5,024,959 0.1% The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §484234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle, licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of * Forecasted Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 ** Budgeted beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies Miscellaneous Revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of Miscellaneous revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources are solely comprised by Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds are utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from the Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) will be made for repayment of loans used for projects and renovations. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2017. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 4,556,371 $ 4,594,828 $ 4,594,828 $ 4,640,699 $ 4,679,582 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 1,339,819 1,339,819 $ $ 1,333,391 1,333,391 $ $ 1,333,391 1,333,391 $ $ 1,336,053 1,336,053 $ $ 1,333,391 1,333,391 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 1,255,492 1,255,492 $ $ 1,297,259 1,297,259 $ $ 1,297,259 1,297,259 $ $ 1,297,170 1,297,170 $ $ 1,297,259 1,297,259 Structural Balance $ 84,327 $ 36,132 $ 36,132 $ 38,883 $ 36,132 Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 4,640,699 4,640,699 $ $ 4,630,960 4,630,960 $ $ 4,630,960 4,630,960 $ $ 4,679,582 4,679,582 $ $ 4,715,714 4,715,714 Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 7,081,566 $ 8,709,963 $ 8,709,963 $ 8,452,339 $ 7,665,550 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,642,718 4,642,718 $ $ 4,754,339 4,754,339 $ $ 4,754,339 4,754,339 $ $ 4,803,560 4,803,560 $ $ 4,831,504 4,831,504 $ $ $ $ 3,090,349 2,500,000 5,590,349 $ $ 3,306,432 2,500,000 5,806,432 $ $ 3,096,830 2,500,000 5,596,830 $ 3,096,830 2,558,639 5,655,469 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 3,271,951 3,271,951 Structural Balance $ 1,370,767 $ 1,657,509 $ 1,447,907 $ 1,713,211 $ 1,734,674 Accounting Adjustments $ 6 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 8,452,339 8,452,339 $ $ 7,867,472 7,867,472 $ $ 7,657,870 7,657,870 $ $ 7,665,550 7,665,550 $ $ 6,841,585 6,841,585 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Service (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 4,401,308 $ 4,401,344 $ 4,401,344 $ 4,275,019 $ 4,275,051 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 3,564,658 3,564,658 $ $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 $ $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 $ $ 3,701,647 3,701,647 $ $ 3,705,813 3,705,813 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 3,690,946 3,690,946 $ $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 $ $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 $ $ 3,701,615 3,701,615 $ $ 3,705,813 3,705,813 Structural Balance $ (126,288) $ - $ - $ 32 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 4,401,344 4,401,344 $ $ 4,401,344 4,401,344 $ $ 4,275,051 4,275,051 $ $ 4,275,051 4,275,051 4,275,019 4,275,019 $ $ Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2015 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2016 REVISED FY 2016 FORECAST FY 2017 ADOPTED $ 7,120,142 $ 6,868,120 $ 6,868,120 $ 7,561,995 $ 7,995,979 $ 2,395,536 2,395,536 $ 2,135,978 2,500,000 4,635,978 $ 2,245,580 2,500,000 4,745,580 $ 2,158,324 2,500,000 4,658,324 $ 2,271,843 2,555,000 4,826,843 $ $ $ 2,500 1,951,183 1,953,683 Structural Balance $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $ 3,000 4,000,000 4,003,000 2,393,036 $ 7,561,995 7,561,995 $ $ $ $ $ 3,000 4,226,952 4,229,952 2,132,978 $ 7,501,098 7,501,098 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,500 4,221,840 4,224,340 $ $ 3,000 4,055,000 4,058,000 2,242,580 $ 2,155,824 $ 2,268,843 7,383,748 7,383,748 $ $ 7,995,979 7,995,979 $ $ 8,764,822 8,764,822 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 1,297,259 $ 1,333,391 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 1,297,259 $ 1,333,391 FY 2017 Baseline Budget $ 1,297,259 $ 1,333,391 FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 1,297,259 $ 0.0% 1,333,391 0.0% 93 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj Mid Year Adjustments Stadium District Expenditure Increase 4,754,339 $ 109,602 $ 109,602 100,000 $ 100,000 - $ 3,306,432 $ 4,754,339 $ (109,602) $ (109,602) (100,000) $ (100,000) - $ 3,096,830 $ 4,754,339 $ 5,709 $ 6,550 (874) 33 (5,709) $ (5,694) - (15) - $ - 77,165 77,165 3,096,830 $ 0.0% 4,831,504 1.6% C-68-16-003-M-00 $ C-68-16-007-2-00 Agenda Item: C-68-16-003-M-00 $ C-68-16-007-2-00 FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Vacancy Savings Assoc with Benefit Adjustments Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Decrease Services Risk Management Adjustment Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec 3,096,830 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj Mid Year Adjustments Stadium District Expenditure Increase $ Agenda Item: $ $ (5,694) $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 2,500,000 $ - FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 2,500,000 $ - $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) - $ - $ - Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Information and Communications Technology Other IT Non Recurring Desk top Replacements Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Agenda Item: $ $ $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget 94 3,639 3,639 - $ 2,555,000 $ 2,555,000 - $ 2,558,639 $ - 3,639 2,555,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 FY 2016 Revised Budget $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 FY 2017 Baseline Budget $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 4,190 $ 4,190 - $ - 4,190 4,190 3,705,813 $ 0.1% 3,705,813 0.1% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Debt Service Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Agenda Item: $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 95 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj 2,135,978 $ - $ - 109,602 109,602 $ 3,000 $ 2,245,580 $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ 2,135,978 $ - $ - 135,865 135,865 $ 3,000 $ 0.0% 2,271,843 6.4% C-68-16-003-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-16-003-M-00 FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec 3,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj $ (109,602) (109,602) Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Stadium District Roof Bearing Replacement 2,500,000 $ 226,952 $ 226,952 - $ 4,226,952 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ (226,952) $ (226,952) (4,000,000) $ (4,000,000) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) - C-68-15-011-M-00 Agenda Item: $ C-68-15-011-M-00 $ FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Chase Field Concrete Repair Project - Phase VI Roof Power Wash 4,000,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Capital Improvement Program Stadium District Roof Bearing Replacement Non Recurring Other Non Recurring $ $ - $ - $ - $ 4,055,000 $ 4,055,000 2,555,000 2,555,000 - 4,055,000 $ 2,555,000 Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2017 Adopted Budget 4,000,000 55,000 $ 96 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2016 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj (1,385,778) $ (109,602) $ (109,602) (109,602) (109,602) $ (1,495,380) $ (1,495,380) $ 109,602 $ 109,602 $ (1,385,778) $ (1,385,778) $ (135,865) $ (135,865) (135,865) (135,865) $ (1,521,643) $ 9.8% (1,521,643) 9.8% C-68-16-003-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-16-003-M-00 FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Operating Transfer to/from Debt Service (1,385,778) $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Revised Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium District Budget Adj $ 109,602 109,602 Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) FY 2016 Revised Budget $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ (2,555,000) $ (2,555,000) (2,555,000) (2,555,000) $ (2,555,000) $ (2,555,000) Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2017 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2017 Adopted Budget 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • Oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a Major League Baseball stadium. • Enhance and promote Major League Baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of existing, baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District As of June 30, 2015 2011 2012 Year Ending June 30 2013 2014 2015 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds $ 34,515,000 $ 42,621,857 30,945,000 $ 37,851,857 8,106,857 Stadium District loans payable Total governmental activities $ $ 22,440,000 $ 28,146,857 6,906,857 $ 19,260,000 $ 19,260,000 5,706,857 $ 16,010,000 $ 16,010,000 - - Stadium District 2012 Revenue Refunding Bonds are special obligations of the District, which were privately placed and not subject to bond rating. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. The Stadium District has pledged future auto rental surcharge revenues to repay the Revenue Refunding Bonds of $16,010,000. Proceeds from the bond issuance provided financing to refund previously issued bonded debt for the construction of Cactus League facilities. The bond is payable through 2019. The following table illustrates the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2015 Year Ending Total June 30 2016 Principal $ Interest 3,325,000 $ 365,028 Debt Service $ 3,690,028 2017 3,405,000 289,218 3,694,218 2018 3,480,000 211,584 3,691,584 2019 5,800,000 Total $ 16,010,000 132,240 $ 99 998,070 5,932,240 $ 17,008,070 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Stadium District 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, approve the Fiscal Year 2017 Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2017 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts DIST. NO. K-91 DISTRICT NAME Queen Creek Water Improv LEVY PURPOSE Bond Interest Bond redemption K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest Bond redemption 28795 Circle City Community Park 28529 Estrella Dells General General 28793 Queen Creek Water Improv General ESTIMATED BUDGET EXPENDITURES FY 2016 FY 2016 138 138 1,420 1,420 1,558 1,558 BUDGET REQUEST FY 2017 73 1,017 1,090 LESS AVAILABLE FUNDS - DIRECT ASSESSMENT FY 2017 73 1,017 1,090 2,374 7,785 10,159 2,374 7,785 10,159 1,440 7,298 8,738 - 1,440 7,298 8,738 13,800 100,000 13,800 100,000 13,800 100,000 - 13,800 100,000 Subtotal 10,900 130,548 10,900 130,548 10,900 124,700 - 10,900 124,700 Total 142,266 142,266 134,528 - 134,528 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies MARICOPA COUNTY STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017 Estimated DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A FY 2016 BUDGET 3,674 3,985 12,897 1,588 9,378 14,208 635 23,947 3,652 6,351 8,523 7,487 317 1,443 5,593 7,736 3,175 13,410 5,142 5,598 7,891 4,374 6,439 952 635 11,122 2,312 16,683 1,250 8,985 3,578 11,415 9,366 14,261 20,375 2,049 2,811 15,057 4,763 34,517 2,955 FY 2017 BUDGET 3,666 3,979 12,938 1,594 13,240 14,255 637 23,908 3,663 6,375 8,548 7,481 318 1,448 5,612 7,760 4,516 13,459 5,159 5,591 7,863 4,390 6,462 956 637 11,162 2,303 16,743 1,254 8,441 1,254 11,456 9,400 14,309 20,432 2,056 2,822 15,039 4,781 34,485 4,199 103 Estimated TAX LEVY 4,143 3,292 11,031 1,427 12,429 11,820 36 18,277 3,477 6,293 8,203 6,661 234 1,157 4,579 6,290 3,659 11,413 4,836 4,408 6,414 3,506 5,940 834 24 10,496 2,338 15,168 1,118 7,323 12 10,439 8,277 12,823 18,902 1,963 2,268 13,841 4,511 32,716 3,325 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 673,582 1,276,741 2,002,015 237,963 7,749,347 1,867,709 361,897 1,739,636 832,407 2,119,550 1,079,746 1,887,620 1,727,386 581,369 1,610,511 1,740,474 622,281 2,135,130 1,182,316 921,268 1,052,939 493,713 3,941,013 812,000 240,271 3,979,987 146,429 5,915,675 372,248 2,818,463 124,438 3,243,730 2,698,741 4,051,104 4,791,318 1,300,726 239,213 1,996,050 993,852 4,387,504 578,919 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.6151 0.2578 0.5510 0.5997 0.1604 0.6329 0.0099 1.0506 0.4177 0.2969 0.7597 0.3529 0.0135 0.1990 0.2843 0.3614 0.5880 0.5345 0.4090 0.4785 0.6092 0.7101 0.1507 0.1027 0.0100 0.2637 1.5967 0.2564 0.3003 0.2598 0.0096 0.3218 0.3067 0.3165 0.3945 0.1509 0.9481 0.6934 0.4539 0.7457 0.5743 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) Estimated DIST # 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 FY 2016 BUDGET 5,045 5,529 32,734 1,588 1,858 8,781 5,137 1,045,429 16,391 3,175 3,493 272 4,128 25,832 3,242 7,758 5,936 20,480 13,682 3,811 2,884 4,280 2,499 29,760 3,898 30,827 32,347 3,811 6,351 3,969 3,749 9,395 18,432 14,970 23,918 10,519 6,553 20,310 18,963 12,755 182,167 6,438 15,524 44,779 27,764 28,114 FY 2017 BUDGET 5,060 5,548 32,703 1,594 1,863 8,812 5,129 1,047,023 16,450 3,188 3,506 430 4,143 25,809 3,251 7,771 5,958 20,462 13,669 3,825 2,893 4,273 2,509 29,739 3,894 30,940 32,316 3,825 6,375 3,965 5,331 9,429 18,500 15,022 23,891 10,552 6,542 20,290 18,945 12,742 182,103 6,433 15,498 44,736 27,735 28,085 104 Estimated TAX LEVY 4,670 4,664 29,345 1,175 1,521 7,978 4,406 964,615 15,348 2,670 2,741 368 3,897 23,843 2,654 6,865 4,714 18,711 12,378 3,234 2,753 3,970 2,044 27,588 3,589 29,562 29,501 3,351 5,845 3,789 4,221 8,718 16,851 13,678 21,255 8,361 5,786 18,936 17,623 11,739 167,397 5,628 14,231 41,339 25,046 26,230 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 768,792 614,249 3,636,518 253,526 265,569 2,941,649 441,713 213,931,598 4,022,987 319,603 658,951 177,879 1,067,462 3,019,478 227,839 408,714 483,138 2,589,583 1,806,542 519,704 176,943 469,560 398,575 3,462,318 348,240 3,751,173 4,065,781 742,824 873,868 309,015 584,991 2,855,079 3,375,230 3,318,219 3,646,078 1,139,356 640,773 2,498,131 2,765,276 1,846,558 38,397,854 1,326,180 1,860,063 7,633,753 4,339,955 3,734,893 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.6074 0.7593 0.8070 0.4635 0.5727 0.2712 0.9975 0.4509 0.3815 0.8354 0.4160 0.2069 0.3651 0.7896 1.1649 1.6797 0.9757 0.7225 0.6852 0.6223 1.5559 0.8455 0.5128 0.7968 1.0306 0.7881 0.7256 0.4511 0.6689 1.2262 0.7215 0.3054 0.4993 0.4122 0.5830 0.7338 0.9030 0.7580 0.6373 0.6357 0.4360 0.4244 0.7651 0.5415 0.5771 0.7023 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) Estimated DIST # 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 DESCRIPTION Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B FY 2016 BUDGET 3,198 6,466 32,931 876 13,399 938 4,686 40,264 5,936 3,640 1,562 2,186 4,786 5,297 9,372 9,890 1,325 5,576 27,155 25,542 8,460 2,499 22,019 6,351 1,588 9,648 2,541 15,928 4,952 4,835 4,266 11,520 2,584 10,642 15,139 922 27,016 37,311 14,810 8,692 683 6,668 23,409 12,659 28,706 4,238 FY 2017 BUDGET 3,210 6,460 32,902 1,091 13,383 936 4,703 40,233 5,958 3,636 2,221 2,195 4,804 5,286 9,407 9,923 1,329 5,572 27,127 25,522 8,451 3,554 22,084 6,375 1,992 9,679 2,550 15,988 4,969 4,850 4,280 11,502 2,591 10,677 15,193 936 26,998 37,286 14,790 8,680 964 6,693 23,389 12,640 28,680 4,234 105 Estimated TAX LEVY 2,700 5,916 31,270 1,235 12,106 711 4,286 36,602 5,428 3,417 1,792 1,855 3,597 4,605 8,826 9,013 1,088 4,976 25,029 22,934 7,115 3,047 20,547 5,649 1,814 8,331 2,193 14,594 4,423 4,333 3,989 10,471 2,234 8,894 13,980 969 22,957 33,535 11,823 7,864 859 5,287 20,088 11,454 26,843 3,641 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 455,676 921,051 4,251,665 1,626,270 2,013,910 795,108 315,659 4,949,497 560,460 536,998 286,379 208,465 452,947 753,789 1,710,107 1,713,995 213,208 838,667 3,646,836 3,363,921 2,916,147 351,141 5,956,926 1,555,484 272,635 749,485 285,534 2,189,825 703,850 430,350 413,279 713,868 487,231 1,293,129 2,426,943 745,224 3,720,215 4,408,128 3,150,665 1,655,749 328,042 988,441 3,506,249 1,415,600 3,179,482 397,397 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.5925 0.6423 0.7355 0.0759 0.6011 0.0894 1.3578 0.7395 0.9685 0.6363 0.6257 0.8898 0.7941 0.6109 0.5161 0.5258 0.5103 0.5933 0.6863 0.6818 0.2440 0.8677 0.3449 0.3632 0.6654 1.1116 0.7680 0.6664 0.6284 1.0069 0.9652 1.4668 0.4585 0.6878 0.5760 0.1300 0.6171 0.7608 0.3753 0.4750 0.2619 0.5349 0.5729 0.8091 0.8443 0.9162 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) Estimated DIST # 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 DESCRIPTION Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 FY 2016 BUDGET 5,421 1,794 769 2,477 5,263 854 2,221 2,182 684 2,819 4,446 4,596 684 2,834 1,623 1,537 4,317 4,061 8,256 4,698 4,919 3,075 1,965 3,929 3,124 7,498 940 10,135 565 854 2,648 1,110 2,419 2,887 11,360 6,950 4,783 11,749 2,694 2,221 769 512 1,879 9,060 684 1,875 FY 2017 BUDGET 5,441 1,789 766 2,470 5,247 852 2,214 2,175 682 2,810 4,462 4,582 682 2,845 1,618 1,533 4,304 4,076 8,287 4,684 4,903 3,066 1,959 3,917 3,136 7,526 937 10,148 563 852 2,640 1,107 2,428 3,139 11,327 6,926 4,769 11,793 2,686 2,214 766 511 1,873 9,093 682 2,352 106 Estimated TAX LEVY 4,648 197 115 205 526 105 235 238 508 375 3,735 519 93 2,648 208 164 361 3,716 7,091 452 477 337 176 456 2,770 6,648 80 8,158 63 122 223 114 2,005 3,255 1,194 717 1,019 10,046 312 120 63 51 207 8,103 57 2,137 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 1,440,395 1,967,747 1,152,580 2,052,452 5,255,265 1,049,021 2,348,232 2,376,565 5,076,675 3,751,284 598,546 5,188,646 930,081 335,203 2,076,995 1,639,182 3,606,749 1,287,349 788,953 4,519,560 4,772,669 3,365,303 1,759,601 4,562,254 352,437 894,678 803,142 2,079,605 626,794 1,219,383 2,229,090 1,138,515 226,421 453,220 11,935,358 7,165,929 10,192,114 2,482,562 3,119,117 1,198,942 634,927 513,933 2,071,567 1,049,847 571,471 222,578 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.3227 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.6240 0.0100 0.0100 0.7900 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.2887 0.8988 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.7860 0.7431 0.0100 0.3923 0.0101 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.8855 0.7182 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.4047 0.0100 0.0100 0.0099 0.0099 0.0100 0.7718 0.0100 0.9601 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) Estimated DIST # 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 DESCRIPTION Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 FY 2016 BUDGET 17,783 6,398 2,811 3,124 46,696 20,676 9,997 6,905 4,015 38,281 33,320 16,428 14,898 18,179 14,608 3,124 9,684 59,348 45,357 5,308 5,788 406,956 6,056 9,060 7,324 45,766 3,192 11,482 51,514 13,121 29,114 46,392 10,934 15,747 16,795 40,813 4,153 5,623 7,820 12,762 53,995 28,979 14,704 54,241 24,568 13,020 FY 2017 BUDGET 17,849 6,421 2,822 3,136 46,969 20,655 10,034 6,929 4,028 38,243 33,284 16,412 14,885 18,163 14,595 4,443 9,720 59,276 45,300 5,302 5,779 406,415 6,078 9,093 7,313 45,725 3,189 11,468 51,462 13,170 29,084 46,351 10,975 15,733 16,775 40,778 4,167 5,644 7,811 12,749 53,941 28,952 14,693 54,192 24,526 13,068 107 Estimated TAX LEVY 15,449 5,808 2,657 2,973 42,090 18,495 8,920 6,175 3,399 34,461 31,773 15,353 13,044 16,388 13,687 3,536 8,861 53,670 40,828 5,062 5,235 370,052 5,870 8,661 6,863 43,265 2,865 9,628 46,643 12,473 26,334 42,177 9,830 14,487 13,585 38,665 3,889 4,919 7,016 10,046 49,756 26,826 13,344 49,690 18,601 12,370 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 3,621,881 916,510 269,333 539,191 5,063,114 2,461,264 1,318,508 1,027,465 318,414 4,600,802 3,505,397 1,928,489 1,898,236 2,082,280 1,462,705 481,640 1,257,900 6,440,427 4,322,152 539,423 597,509 28,741,252 647,209 1,180,257 780,122 5,385,645 395,033 1,509,540 5,991,262 1,660,064 2,657,494 4,970,851 1,346,286 1,305,357 3,301,032 3,421,007 680,237 531,924 1,181,635 2,323,110 7,181,256 3,595,983 1,949,305 6,154,396 7,181,311 3,475,234 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.4265 0.6337 0.9865 0.5514 0.8313 0.7514 0.6765 0.6010 1.0675 0.7490 0.9064 0.7961 0.6872 0.7870 0.9357 0.7342 0.7044 0.8333 0.9446 0.9384 0.8761 1.2875 0.9070 0.7338 0.8797 0.8033 0.7253 0.6378 0.7785 0.7514 0.9909 0.8485 0.7302 1.1098 0.4115 1.1302 0.5717 0.9248 0.5938 0.4324 0.6929 0.7460 0.6846 0.8074 0.2590 0.3559 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2017 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) Estimated DIST # 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 23697 13435 23104 DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vista Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Coldwater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Arroyo Norte Unit 4 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 Litchfield Vista Views FY 2016 BUDGET 21,275 9,526 4,128 11,325 26,589 22,748 20,978 1,365 10,823 4,796 21,624 13,791 7,358 3,814 18,362 2,774 10,796 779,375 1,680 8,065 107,015 52,471 2,186 16,844 25,699 4,761 58,667 1,453 5,144 32,387 6,352 36,057 10,562 84,653 17,973 4,770 32,979 4,608 736 4,866 FY 2017 BUDGET 21,355 9,562 4,143 11,314 26,571 22,728 20,964 2,268 10,809 4,790 21,610 13,842 7,353 3,809 18,332 2,771 10,831 780,189 1,679 8,029 106,841 53,348 2,195 16,774 25,223 4,746 58,502 1,447 5,123 32,247 6,324 35,913 20,900 84,587 17,901 4,782 32,830 4,590 734 4,846 5,583,291 5,606,502 3,124 2,471 3,920 2,468 108 Estimated TAX LEVY 19,965 9,239 3,924 10,275 25,794 20,521 18,970 1,740 8,922 4,438 19,697 12,764 10,504 2,913 13,276 2,269 9,031 584,872 1,280 6,194 98,703 9,596 1,902 12,440 18,693 3,989 43,400 1,139 3,692 23,116 4,951 26,281 25,203 61,284 12,701 3,690 27,390 3,336 539 4,213 TAX YEAR 2016 NET ASSESSED VALUE 3,110,906 2,978,582 1,072,395 1,725,994 3,817,128 2,359,302 2,491,868 1,443,630 3,164,626 587,678 2,538,268 1,964,895 1,436,626 1,484,604 2,455,678 1,389,801 1,141,516 120,754,589 524,776 2,358,516 21,645,220 14,961,516 848,692 3,798,565 8,772,350 3,465,222 19,715,689 2,148,335 5,157,094 10,620,654 1,907,839 8,999,698 3,542,274 24,068,529 18,346,555 4,841,381 3,558,878 6,806,851 1,249,669 2,025,226 2016 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 Estimated 2016 TAX RATE 0.6418 0.3102 0.3659 0.5953 0.6757 0.8698 0.7613 0.1205 0.2819 0.7552 0.7760 0.6496 0.7312 0.1962 0.5406 0.1633 0.7911 0.4843 0.2439 0.2626 0.4560 0.0641 0.2241 0.3275 0.2131 0.1151 0.2201 0.0530 0.0716 0.2177 0.2595 0.2920 0.7115 0.2546 0.0692 0.0762 0.7696 0.0490 0.0431 0.2080