CO U N TY ,L T Bu ib ra sin ry, St es ad sS ium tra an te d Ot gi he es rS pe cia lD ist ric ts M FY A AD 20 R IC Flo OP 1 6 od TE O Co D B An nt UD nu PA ro G l E al Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Staffing Variance Analysis General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Strategic Business Planning (SBP) for All Projects Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Sources and Uses by Project Flood Control District Small Project Assistance Program i 1 3 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 14 15 16 16 16 16 27 28 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 31 32 35 36 36 38 39 54 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Library District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 59 61 63 64 65 66 67 67 68 69 70 71 71 72 72 72 74 75 77 77 77 77 77 78 80 Stadium District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary ii 85 87 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 97 98 98 98 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Table of Contents 102 102 102 102 103 103 Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service 103 105 109 Improvement Districts 113 114 115 Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion Adopt the Flood Control District FY 2016 Budget in the amount of $100,840,393 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Flood Control District. This amount represents a $2,000,000 increase from the FY 2016 Tentative Budget of $98,840,393. The increase is for the Flood Control Capital Improvement Program. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Steve Chucri, Chairman, District 2 Denny Barney, District 1 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The FY 2016 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $98,840,393. Capital project expenditures are budgeted at $66,000,000. This is an increase of $26,000,000 from FY 2015 and is supported by a partnership with the Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS to rehabilitate four major dam structures over the next 5 years. Commercial and residential property values have decreased only slightly from FY 2015. The FY 2016 budget has been developed with an increased tax rate of 2 cents to $0.1592 per hundred dollars net assessed value. This has increased the Flood Control District Levy to $49,512,136 for FY 2016, an increase of $5,851,804 from FY 2015. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue total $34,453,000 for cost sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2016, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $49.6 million, which is $5,620,581 (12.8%) more than FY 2015. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2014 through FY 2016 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 FY 2014 Actuals FY 2015 Forecast FY 2016 Budget The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. In all, the Flood Control District has 42 scheduled projects totaling $248 million in the five-year Capital Improvement Program. There is an additional $1.9 million in the Small Projects Assistance Program and $1.2 million in the Floodprone Property Assistance Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District On June 22, 2015, the Maricopa County Flood Control District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2016 Budget totaling $100,840,393. The budget increased by $2 million from the Tentative Adopted Budget, thereby increasing the Capital Improvement Program budget by $2 million. On August 17, 2015, the Board of Directors approved the FY 2016 Tax Levy and Rate. New River Dam Cave Buttes Dam 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) is to provide regional flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation an education to Maricopa County residents so they can reduce the risk of injury, death, and property damage from flooding, while still enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The Flood Control District vision is for the residents of Maricopa County and future generations to have the maximum level of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multi-use facilities that complement and enhance the beauty of our desert environment. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to District social media satisfaction surveys will indicate satisfaction with the District’s use of social media to provide flood hazard education. Status: The District actively engages the community through social media accounts. The accounts are used to promote flood safety, inform and interact with all stakeholders about District activities, projects and studies, and to serve as a resource to the media. The first satisfaction survey will be conducted in June 2015 and will provide feedback for a full year of activity. Government Operations By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to the Citizen Satisfaction Survey will indicate satisfaction with the District. Status: The County’s 2014 Customer Satisfaction Survey indicated that 91% of 1,102 respondents were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the District. Efforts to involve the public have been directed toward all stakeholders, including but not limited to homeowners, businesses, students and educators. In addition to traditional public meetings, advertising and media relations the District developed a monthly stakeholder group that is open to the public. It is inclusive of a diverse audience complete with a flood awareness education program geared towards science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Regional Services Flood Control District By June 30, 2018, the District will increase County resident’s insurance premium discounts from 30% to 35% through the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System program. Status: Due to changes in the National Flood Insurance Program post Hurricane Sandy, this goal will require substantial investment in Flood Control District resources in order to reach the 35% target. District staff will be participating in a Community Rating System audit late spring 2015 and will revise programs to qualify for the increased discounts on flood insurance by the June 30, 2018 target date if feasible. The cooperation of other County departments will be needed in order to qualify for the increased discounts. Government Operations By June 30, 2018, the annual voluntary turnover rate of District full-time employees will be 10% or less. Status: During FY 2014, 20 of the 255 positions or 8% of the turnover was voluntary. To address the anticipated retirement surge, the District is developing a resiliency plan as part of the strategic business plan. The plan will address information transfer, career ladders, employee rotation, policy and procedures, and critical knowledge needs. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Project Program submittals. Status: Over the past four fiscal years, the District has participated in 100% of qualifying projects submitted to the Small Projects Assistance program. There were eight projects in FY 2013, eight projects in FY 2014, seven projects in FY 2015, and twelve projects have been approved for FY 2016. It is anticipated that as long as sufficient funding is available, the District will continue to participate in 100% of qualifying projects submitted to the program. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will have conducted engineering inspections on 100% of District maintained non-dam structures completed prior to 1996; and the District will initiate corrective action on 50% of identified deficiencies extending the useful life of those structures to provide ongoing flood protection to downstream residents. Status: Pre 1996 non-dam inspections continued into FY 2015 and will continue into FY 2016 and beyond. Six of the 25 non-dam structures have been inspected and reports compiled. The goal remains to have all non-dam inspections completed by June 2018 and subject to the availability of funding the corrective actions on 50% of the identified deficiencies will also be completed. 6 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Safe Communities Flood Control District By June 30, 2018, the District will increase the accuracy and effectiveness of flood hazard identification for 25% of prioritized watershed so that underlying County residents can be best informed of flooding hazard. Status: The District identified 21 areas as having the highest priority for new or updated Area Drainage Master Studies (ADMS). In FY 2014 and FY 2015, the District initiated studies in five of those areas; Paradise Valley/Scottsdale/Phoenix (PVSP) West (Middle Indian Bend), Upper East Fork Cave Creek, North Mesa, Ahwatukee foothills and Laveen. For FY 2016 the District plans to start four additional studies (budget permitting) which are: Woolsey/Gillespie, Queen Creek, PVSP East, and Carefree/Desert Mountain. 7 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 17,048,755 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 48,917,990 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 174,600 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 186,052 INTEREST EARNINGS 100,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 263,612 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 49,642,254 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ SUBTOTAL 6,504,950 $ - $ - $ 345,000 - $ 34,453,000 $ 34,195,616 345,000 $ 68,648,616 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 49,987,254 $ 68,648,616 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 16,314,801 $ SUPPLIES 1,628,842 SERVICES 13,775,683 CAPITAL 776,067 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 32,495,393 $ 23,553,705 TOTAL $ - $ 23,553,705 48,917,990 $ 174,600 186,052 100,000 263,612 49,642,254 $ - $ $ 48,917,990 174,600 186,052 100,000 263,612 49,642,254 345,000 34,453,000 $ - $ 34,195,616 (34,195,616) 68,993,616 $ (34,195,616) $ 345,000 34,453,000 34,798,000 $ 118,635,870 $ (34,195,616) $ $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ - $ 2,004,000 $ 2,004,000 $ - $ SERVICES 345,000 345,000 CAPITAL 65,996,000 65,996,000 OTHER FINANCING USES 34,195,616 34,195,616 (34,195,616) TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 34,540,616 $ 68,000,000 $ 102,540,616 $ (34,195,616) $ 2,004,000 345,000 65,996,000 68,345,000 - $ $ 68,000,000 $ 135,036,009 $ (34,195,616) $ 100,840,393 $ - $ 17,146,861 7,153,566 $ - $ 7,153,566 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 17,146,861 $ - $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ $ 7,153,566 $ - 16,314,801 $ 1,628,842 13,775,683 776,067 32,495,393 $ 84,440,254 16,314,801 1,628,842 13,775,683 776,067 32,495,393 TOTAL USES $ 67,036,009 - $ - $ ELIMINATIONS 8 17,146,861 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2015 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOOD CONTROL CIP All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ $ 32,495,393 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ $ FY 2015 REVISED $ 32,495,393 30,000,000 62,495,393 - $ 500,000 1,614,000 38,386,000 40,000,000 $ $ 1,614,000 38,386,000 40,000,000 FY 2016 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 32,495,393 $ 34,195,616 (4,195,616) $ 66,691,009 $ (4,195,616) $ 345,000 3,050,000 64,950,000 $ 68,000,000 $ (1,436,000) (26,564,000) $ (28,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ 72,495,393 9 $ 72,995,393 $100,840,393 155,000 4,195,616 $ (27,845,000) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $100,840,393 Fund Balance $16,400,139 16% Property Taxes & PILT $49,104,042 49% Intergovernmental & Grants $34,798,000 35% Miscellaneous & Interest $363,612 0% Permits, Fees & Fines $174,600 0% Uses of Funds $100,840,393 Administrative Services $6,576,759 7% Information Technology $2,420,393 2% Flood Hazard Identification $7,707,813 8% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,319,713 2% Flood Hazard Regulation $1,283,286 1% Flood Hazard Remediation $80,532,429 80% 10 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2014 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ $ 121,710 $ 121,710 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 $ 137,335 $ 137,335 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 $ - 0.0% 0.0% FWRN - FLOOD WARNING 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ $ - $ - $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ - 0.0% 0.0% FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ 250,194 $ 250,194 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 500,000 $ - $ 345,000 345,000 $ (155,000) (155,000) N/A -31.0% -31.0% 4,278,135 $ 2,000 4,280,135 $ 5,700,000 $ 58,150 5,758,150 $ 5,700,000 $ 58,150 5,758,150 $ 7,729,989 $ 51,628 7,781,617 $ 34,453,000 $ 34,453,000 $ 28,753,000 (58,150) 28,694,850 504.4% -100.0% 498.3% - $ 283,776 5,000 288,776 $ - $ 283,776 5,000 288,776 $ - $ 10,909 363,527 19,525 393,961 $ - $ 135,477 161,135 296,612 $ HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ $ FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ 154,771 $ 196,835 887,651 1,239,257 $ N/A N/A N/A (148,299) -52.3% 156,135 3122.7% 7,836 2.7% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 39,756,368 $ 39,756,368 $ 43,503,147 $ 43,503,147 $ 43,503,147 $ 43,503,147 $ 43,447,112 $ 43,447,112 $ 49,204,042 $ 49,204,042 $ GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 115,401 $ 115,401 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 13,675 $ 13,675 $ - $ - $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 45,763,065 $ 49,721,673 $ 50,221,673 $ 52,280,700 $ 84,440,254 $ 301,789 $ 1,788,990 2,090,779 $ 496,758 $ 915,744 1,412,502 $ 502,616 $ 924,208 1,426,824 $ 368,724 $ 907,806 1,276,530 $ 337,847 $ 945,439 1,283,286 $ 164,769 (21,231) 143,538 32.8% -2.3% 10.1% 125,609 $ 220,546 1,107,810 501,179 1,955,144 $ 165,678 $ 858,173 1,240,001 538,035 2,801,887 $ 98,726 $ 809,831 1,251,636 488,171 2,648,364 $ 56,498 $ 671,888 1,202,057 504,102 2,434,545 $ 104,164 $ 651,990 1,253,213 310,346 2,319,713 $ (5,438) 157,841 (1,577) 177,825 328,651 -5.5% 19.5% -0.1% 36.4% 12.4% 1,998,396 $ 5,348,557 7,346,953 $ 2,174,953 $ 5,458,797 7,633,750 $ 2,232,752 $ 6,030,756 8,263,508 $ 1,775,078 $ 4,898,654 6,673,732 $ 2,225,587 $ 5,482,226 7,707,813 $ 7,165 548,530 555,695 0.3% 9.1% 6.7% 45,065,483 $ 7,338,071 52,403,554 $ 40,828,015 $ 11,073,716 51,901,731 $ 40,834,487 $ 11,128,528 51,963,015 $ 39,530,295 $ 9,760,216 49,290,511 $ 68,967,794 $ 11,564,635 80,532,429 $ (28,133,307) (436,107) (28,569,414) -68.9% -3.9% -55.0% 409,923 $ 412,021 126,678 1,599,756 281,337 41,838 666,811 3,538,364 $ 510,792 $ 561,789 560,156 553,376 286,799 215,209 106,357 26,530 824,459 611,920 4,257,387 $ 506,069 $ 562,686 107,198 1,001,235 290,907 171,725 108,425 26,530 845,914 507,291 4,127,980 $ 489,995 $ 484,302 100,228 1,022,467 279,109 132,539 109,306 14,803 774,789 2,718,000 6,125,538 $ 523,569 $ 530,404 114,797 1,114,224 184,522 306,199 121,528 102,831 17,295 687,351 741,800 4,444,520 $ (17,500) 32,282 (7,599) (112,989) (184,522) (15,292) 50,197 5,594 9,235 158,563 (234,509) (316,540) -3.5% 5.7% -7.1% -11.3% N/A -5.3% 29.2% 5.2% 34.8% 18.7% -46.2% -7.7% 1,592,089 $ 448,277 2,040,366 $ 1,730,641 $ 230,853 172,157 2,133,651 $ 1,730,641 $ 230,853 172,157 2,133,651 $ 1,730,642 $ 228,218 172,164 2,131,024 $ 1,667,648 $ 237,663 226,928 2,132,239 $ 62,993 (6,810) (54,771) 1,412 3.6% -2.9% N/A -31.8% 0.1% $ 719,562 $ 327,127 1,067,831 153,015 2,267,535 $ 890,758 $ 1,125,492 338,235 2,354,485 $ 914,308 $ 1,180,939 336,804 2,432,051 $ 513,737 $ 1,017,758 268,098 1,799,593 $ 936,968 $ 1,143,077 340,348 2,420,393 $ (22,660) 37,862 (3,544) 11,658 -2.5% N/A 3.2% -1.1% 0.5% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 71,642,695 $ 72,495,393 $ 72,995,393 $ 69,731,473 $ 100,840,393 $ (27,845,000) -38.1% 5,700,895 5,700,895 (30,000) (30,000) 34,218,581 13.1% 13.1% -100.0% -100.0% 68.1% USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ $ $ HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT POOL - POOLED COSTS PROC - PROCUREMENT RCOM - REGULATION COMPLIANCE RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2014 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ 39,655,195 39,655,195 FY 2015 ADOPTED $ $ 454,212 $ 454,212 $ FY 2015 REVISED 43,100,665 $ 43,100,665 $ 43,100,665 43,100,665 FY 2015 FORECAST $ $ 43,100,665 43,100,665 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ $ 48,917,990 48,917,990 $ $ 5,817,325 5,817,325 13.5% 13.5% 174,600 174,600 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% 174,600 174,600 $ $ 174,600 $ 174,600 $ 259,154 $ 259,154 $ $ $ 5,700,000 152,482 5,852,482 500,000 $ 5,700,000 152,482 6,352,482 $ 500,000 $ 7,729,989 152,482 8,382,471 $ 345,000 $ 34,453,000 186,052 34,984,052 $ (155,000) 28,753,000 33,570 28,631,570 -31.0% 504.4% 22.0% 450.7% 117,948 $ 944,155 1,062,103 $ 250,000 343,926 593,926 $ 250,000 $ 343,926 593,926 $ 193,965 $ 344,445 538,410 $ 100,000 $ 263,612 363,612 $ (150,000) (80,314) (230,314) -60.0% -23.4% -38.8% 159,134 4,278,135 154,286 4,591,555 $ $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 45,763,065 $ 49,721,673 $ 50,221,673 $ 52,280,700 $ 84,440,254 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 45,763,065 FY 2014 ACTUAL $ 49,721,673 $ FY 2015 ADOPTED 50,221,673 FY 2015 REVISED $ 52,280,700 FY 2015 FORECAST $ 84,440,254 FY 2016 ADOPTED $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 34,218,581 68.1% 34,218,581 68.1% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 12,201,515 $ 20,178 4,187,905 30,743 (991,078) 1,603,953 17,053,216 $ 13,944,303 $ 56,330 4,668,856 10,012 (5,290,542) 5,003,058 18,392,017 $ 13,870,349 $ 37,440 56,330 4,710,989 10,012 (5,393,211) 5,068,837 18,360,746 $ 13,413,025 $ 50,862 47,095 4,520,985 30,306 (5,202,018) 4,147,267 17,007,522 $ 11,148,355 $ 50,136 53,300 4,032,207 14,000 (2,001,000) 5,021,803 18,318,801 $ 2,721,994 (12,696) 3,030 678,782 (3,988) (3,392,211) 47,034 41,945 19.6% -33.9% 5.4% 14.4% -39.8% -62.9% 0.9% 0.2% 859,024 $ 324,904 35,177 (39,513) 123,271 1,302,863 $ 1,035,949 $ 425,366 126,400 (48,686) 184,981 1,724,010 $ 1,035,949 $ 425,366 126,400 (48,686) 184,951 1,723,980 $ 856,647 $ 355,823 92,304 (61,724) 194,106 1,437,156 $ 966,244 $ 378,666 127,400 156,532 1,628,842 $ 69,705 46,700 (1,000) (48,686) 28,419 95,138 6.7% 11.0% -0.8% -100.0% 15.4% 5.5% 5,527,453 $ 6,837,148 394,890 210,880 2,831,182 39,507 68,021 17,755 337,452 (196,190) 160,796 16,228,894 $ 103,000 $ 8,249,177 442,136 941,065 2,977,058 110,450 89,450 12,050 325,200 (201,670) 284,363 13,332,279 $ 103,000 $ 8,280,245 442,136 941,065 2,977,058 110,450 89,450 12,050 325,200 (201,670) 284,596 13,363,580 $ 51,854 $ 8,175,564 479,995 557,576 3,012,838 349 67,833 66,397 14,478 412,140 (49,847) 208,927 12,998,104 $ 59,113 $ 8,734,465 485,465 962,985 3,036,638 108,250 67,421 9,300 325,200 331,846 14,120,683 $ 43,887 (454,220) (43,329) (21,920) (59,580) 2,200 22,029 2,750 (201,670) (47,250) (757,103) 42.6% -5.5% -9.8% -2.3% -2.0% N/A 2.0% 24.6% 22.8% 0.0% -100.0% -16.6% -5.7% $ 2,178,701 $ 106,928 314,062 34,450,035 7,996 37,057,722 $ 1,615,000 $ 147,250 906,268 36,385,000 (11,000) 4,569 39,047,087 $ 1,615,000 $ 147,250 906,268 36,885,000 (11,000) 4,569 39,547,087 $ 1,149,018 $ 375,721 819,120 35,943,363 1,469 38,288,691 $ 235,000 $ 40,000 735,500 65,761,000 567 66,772,067 $ 1,380,000 107,250 170,768 (28,876,000) (11,000) 4,002 (27,224,980) 85.4% 72.8% 18.8% -78.3% -100.0% 87.6% -68.8% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 71,642,695 $ 72,495,393 $ 72,995,393 $ 69,731,473 $ 100,840,393 $ (27,845,000) -38.1% TOTAL USES $ 71,642,695 $ 72,495,393 $ 72,995,393 $ 69,731,473 $ 100,840,393 $ (27,845,000) -38.1% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0910 - LAND 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0955 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION OUT 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 12 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2016 ADOPTED (171,060) $ 330,194 159,134 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 500,000 $ - $ 345,000 345,000 $ 41,251,560 $ 74,236 41,325,796 $ 44,021,673 $ 44,021,673 $ 44,021,673 $ 44,021,673 $ 44,050,711 $ 44,050,711 $ 49,642,254 $ 49,642,254 $ 5,620,581 5,620,581 12.8% N/A 12.8% SOURCES $ 14,696,402 $ 4,278,135 18,974,537 $ 30,000,000 $ 5,700,000 35,700,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 5,700,000 35,700,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 7,729,989 37,729,989 $ 34,195,616 $ 34,453,000 68,648,616 $ 4,195,616 28,753,000 32,948,616 14.0% 504.4% 92.3% $ SOURCES $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (4,195,616) (4,195,616) 14.0% 14.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 41,080,500 $ 4,682,565 $ 45,763,065 $ 44,021,673 $ 5,700,000 $ 49,721,673 $ 44,021,673 $ 6,200,000 $ 50,221,673 $ 44,050,711 $ 8,229,989 $ 52,280,700 $ 49,642,254 $ 34,798,000 $ 84,440,254 $ 5,620,581 28,598,000 34,218,581 12.8% 461.3% 68.1% FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST (155,000) (155,000) N/A -31.0% -31.0% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2016 ADOPTED $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 345,000 $ 345,000 $ $ 27,647,232 $ 20,071,995 47,719,227 $ 32,495,393 $ 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ 32,495,393 $ 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ 30,498,529 $ 30,000,000 60,498,529 $ 32,495,393 $ 34,195,616 66,691,009 $ (4,195,616) (4,195,616) 0.0% -14.0% -6.7% 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 155,000 155,000 31.0% 31.0% FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG $ FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,195,194 $ 37,265,542 38,460,736 $ 1,614,000 $ 38,386,000 40,000,000 $ 1,614,000 $ 38,386,000 40,000,000 $ 1,565,339 $ 37,167,605 38,732,944 $ 3,050,000 $ 64,950,000 68,000,000 $ (1,436,000) (26,564,000) (28,000,000) -89.0% -69.2% -70.0% (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ 4,195,616 4,195,616 -14.0% -14.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 27,647,232 $ 43,995,463 $ 71,642,695 $ 32,495,393 $ 40,000,000 $ 72,495,393 $ 32,495,393 $ 40,500,000 $ 72,995,393 $ (27,845,000) (27,845,000) 0.0% -68.8% -38.1% 30,498,529 $ 32,495,393 $ 39,232,944 $ 68,345,000 $ 69,731,473 $ 100,840,393 $ Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 Non-Recurring $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 Non-Recurring $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 ELIMINATIONS $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) Non-Recurring $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 13 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 Non-Recurring $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 Non-Recurring $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 34,195,616 ELIMINATIONS $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) Non-Recurring $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (34,195,616) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION FLOOD WARNING PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT REGULATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 25.00 9.00 34.00 14.00 11.00 25.00 14.50 11.00 25.50 14.50 11.00 25.50 15.00 11.00 26.00 .50 .50 3.4% 0.0% 2.0% 2.00 5.00 3.00 9.00 19.00 2.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 23.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 9.00 20.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 9.00 20.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 9.00 19.00 (1.00) (1.00) 0.0% 0.0% (50.0%) 0.0% (5.0%) 16.00 6.00 22.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.00 77.00 103.00 15.00 87.00 102.00 15.00 86.00 101.00 15.00 86.00 101.00 17.00 86.50 103.50 2.00 .50 2.50 13.3% 0.6% 2.5% 8.00 15.00 1.00 4.00 27.00 1.00 56.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 2.00 53.00 7.00 7.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 1.00 54.00 7.00 8.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 1.00 55.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 27.00 (1.00) 1.00 (27.00) (27.00) 0.0% (14.3%) 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% (100.0%) 0.0% 0.0% (50.0%) 18.00 18.00 252.00 14.00 14.00 228.00 211.50 212.50 186.50 (25.00) N/A N/A (11.8%) 14 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Administrative Staff Supv Administrative Supervisor Applications Development Mgr Applications Development Supv Atmospheric Science Pro Attorney - Senior Counsel Chemical Applicatns Tech Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Communicatn Officer Supervisor Construction Maintenance Supv Crew Leader Database Administrator Deputy Director Deputy Director - Flood Control Development Services Supervisor Development Svcs Technician Development Svcs Technician Sr Director - Flood Control District Engineer Engineering Associate Engineering Manager Engineering Specialist Engineering Supervisor Engineering Support Branch Manager Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Executive Assistant Field Operations Supervisor Finance Manager - Large Finance Support Supervisor Finance/Business Analyst General Maintenance Worker GIS Programmer/Analyst GIS Programmer/Analyst - Senior/Lead GIS Technician Heavy Equipment Operator Heavy Equipment Operator - Sr Inspection Supervisor Inspector Instrumentation Tech-Water Management Analyst Management Assistant Mechanic - Automotive Media Specialist Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized Operations Supervisor - PW Operations/Program Manager Planning Supervisor Procurement Officer - Dept Procurement Specialist Procurement Supervisor - Dept Public Works Chief Appraiser Real Property Manager Real Property Specialist Real Property Supervisor Software Sys Engineer Survey Technician Technical Program Supv Title Examiner Trades Generalist Water Instrument Tech Supv Web Designer/Developer Department Total FY 2014 ADOPTED 2.00 4.00 6.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 35.00 18.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 15.00 4.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 2.00 16.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 252.00 FY 2015 ADOPTED 2.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 28.00 16.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 14.00 4.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 8.00 2.00 7.00 4.00 2.00 12.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 228.00 15 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 29.50 29.50 16.00 16.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 12.00 12.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 211.50 212.50 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 2.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 5.00 (1.00) (16.7%) 1.00 (1.00) (50.0%) 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A 1.00 0.0% N/A 5.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% N/A N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 N/A (2.00) (100.0%) (1.00) (100.0%) 1.00 0.0% 3.4% 30.50 1.00 16.00 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 1.00 (3.00) (75.0%) 8.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 4.00 (6.00) (60.0%) 4.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 7.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 10.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A 7.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 12.00 0.0% 4.00 0.0% 3.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 (2.00) (66.7%) 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% (1.00) (100.0%) 3.00 1.00 50.0% 1.00 0.0% (1.00) (100.0%) (1.00) (100.0%) (10.00) (100.0%) (3.00) (100.0%) 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 N/A 5.00 3.00 150.0% 10.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 186.50 (25.00) (11.8% ) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 991 FLOOD CONTROL Department Total FY 2014 ADOPTED 252.00 252.00 FY 2015 ADOPTED 228.00 228.00 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 211.50 212.50 211.50 212.50 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 186.50 (25.00) (11.8%) 186.50 (25.00) (11.8% ) Staffing Variance Analysis The Flood Control District has decreased staff by 25 FTE in the Flood Control Operating Fund (991) due to the movement of Real Estate staff to the Facilities Management Department. General Adjustments Personnel: FY 2016 personnel expenditures have increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments made in FY 2015. Base Adjustments: Flood Control Fund (991) Operating • Decrease Regular Benefits by $13,029 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $54,771 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Regulation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Regulation Program is to provide advisory information and enforcement services to the public with property within floodplains so they can avoid causing adverse impacts to surrounding property, and use their property safely and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District. Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District. Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt. Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request. FY 2014 ACTUAL 90.8% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Permitting • Floodplain Regulation Compliance 16 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Floodplain Permitting Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Permitting Activity is to provide clearance and permitting services to the permit applicant so they can make changes needed to their plans or pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District. Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District. Number of floodplain use permit applications reviewed. Number of map change reviews completed. Number of floodplain use permit applications submitted. Number of map change reviews requested. Total expenditure per map change review. FY 2014 ACTUAL 90.8% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 88.2% 100.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 402 350 350 100 (250) -71.4% 17 402 8 350 8 350 10 100 2 (250) 25.0% -71.4% 17 $ 105,234.71 8 $ 115,526.00 8 $ 113,475.75 10 $ 94,543.90 2 $ 20,982.10 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 121,710 121,710 $ $ 134,600 134,600 $ $ 137,335 137,335 $ $ 134,600 134,600 $ $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,788,990 $ 1,788,990 $ $ 924,208 924,208 $ $ 907,806 907,806 $ $ 945,439 945,439 $ $ - 25.0% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0% Expenditure (21,231) (21,231) -2.3% -2.3% Activity Narrative: FY 2016 output and demands are expected to be consistent with FY 2015 figures. Activity demand is generally driven by development and property improvements in unincorporated Maricopa County and the communities for which the District provides floodplain management. Technical review for unincorporated Maricopa County is now performed by the Maricopa County Planning & Development Department at the One-Stop-Shop. The District is still legally responsible for permitting, enforcement and all costs. Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity is to provide inspection and enforcement services to property owners so they can develop their property without adversely affecting surrounding property. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt. Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request. Number of floodplain complaints investigated. Number of floodplain use permit inspections completed. Number of floodplain complaints. Number of floodplain use permits requiring inspection. Total expenditure per floodplain use permit inspection completed. 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES Flood Control District FY 2014 ACTUAL 99.3% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 142 538 100 550 100 550 100 500 (50) 0.0% -9.1% 142 538 100 550 100 550 100 500 (50) 0.0% -9.1% $ 560.95 $ 913.85 $ 670.41 $ 675.69 $ 238.15 26.1% $ $ 301,789 301,789 $ $ 502,616 502,616 $ $ 368,724 368,724 $ $ 337,847 337,847 $ $ 164,769 164,769 32.8% 32.8% Activity Narrative: Demand is driven by customer complaints and field inspections within unincorporated Maricopa County and the communities for which the District provided floodplain management. The district absorbs all cost for permit inspections done for unincorporated Maricopa County now conducted by the Maricopa County Planning & Development Department staff. All enforcement action and assistance to communities are completed by District staff. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information services to the public and other agencies so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves from injury and loss of property from flooding. Program Results Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study. Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards. Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available. Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies. Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received. FY 2014 ACTUAL 99.1% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 98.0% 98.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 90.2% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (7.8%) -8.0% 98.0% 87.0% 87.0% 90.0% 3.0% 3.5% 99.4% 99.0% 99.3% 98.6% (0.4%) -0.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% (10.0%) -10.0% Activities that comprise the program include: • • • • Flood Control Customer Service Flood Control Public Information 18 Flood Safety Education Flood Warning Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Customer Service Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Customer Service Activity is to provide responsive flood hazard and mitigation advisory information services to the general public, government agencies and other entities so they can make informed development decisions and be protected from loss of life and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received. Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests completed. Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests received. Total activity expenditure per citizen information request response provided. 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES FY 2014 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (10.0%) -10.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 90.0% 6,036 5,000 5,000 6,200 1,200 24.0% 6,036 5,000 5,000 6,200 1,200 24.0% $ 36.54 $ 161.97 $ 134.38 $ 105.16 $ 56.81 35.1% $ $ 220,546 220,546 $ $ 809,831 809,831 $ $ 671,888 671,888 $ $ 651,990 651,990 $ $ 157,841 157,841 19.5% 19.5% Activity Narrative: Customer requests under this activity have steadily increased from previous years. New federal flood insurance requirements and flood risk management standards will increase activity in outreach and staff response to federal programs such as: Community Rating System (CRS), National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), levee certification, and floodplain map information. Flood Control Public Information Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Public Information Activity is to provide project and study information services to affected Maricopa County residents and property owners so they can understand how their flooding risk is being mitigated in order to preclude injury, loss of life, and property damage. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3609E requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Flood Control District Measure FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of affected residents surveyed who 99.1% 98.0% 98.0% 90.2% (7.8%) -8.0% report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study. Number of public meetings held. 14 26 26 13 (13) -50.0% Number of printed materials produced. 98 52 52 50 (2) -3.8% Number of website hits received. 50,430,340 12,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 (2,000,000) -16.7% Number of public meetings required. 14 26 26 13 (13) -50.0% Number of printed materials (including 98 52 52 50 (2) -3.8% brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed. Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ (0.00) -26.6% that utilized the District website. 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 125,609 125,609 $ $ 98,726 98,726 $ $ 56,498 56,498 $ $ 104,164 104,164 $ $ (5,438) (5,438) -5.5% -5.5% Activity Narrative: Demand for the District’s website content remains high. Public meeting demand generally corresponds to the volume of planning, delineation and capital projects, which remains relatively constant with just a slight increase. The District now uses SiteImprove as the content management system. Google Analytics was used in the past and was not as accurate since it included non-direct hits to the site. The Result, Output and Demand is decreasing, but the information received is much better. Flood Safety Education Activity The purpose of the Flood Safety Education Activity is to provide flood and storm water safety education services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can be aware of flood hazards and understand how to avoid injury and loss of life due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2015 Measure FY 2014 REV VS ADOPTED VAR % FORECAST ADOPTED REVISED Description ACTUAL 3.0% 3.5% 90.0% 87.0% 87.0% Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that 98.0% understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards. 11.1% 1 10 9 9 Number of school and civic presentations 12 completed. 11.1% 1 10 9 9 Number of school and civic presentations 12 requested. 42.8% Total expenditure per school and civic $ 41,764.92 $ 54,241.22 $ 56,011.33 $ 31,034.60 $ 23,206.62 presentation. 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 501,179 501,179 $ $ 488,171 488,171 $ $ 504,102 504,102 $ $ 310,346 310,346 $ $ 177,825 177,825 36.4% 36.4% Activity Narrative: Demand for school and civic presentations, and other flood safety education objectives, are expected to be similar to FY 2015 due to limited staff availability. However, in an effort to increase the number of presentation, library displays have been placed in six county libraries advertising the District’s willingness to accommodate presentation requests. Additionally, information packets promoting flood safety presentations are sent to schools in outlying county communities such as Gila Bend, Circle City, New River and Wickenburg. 20 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Warning Activity The purpose of the Flood Warning Activity is to provide reliable weather, water level and stream flow information and flood response planning services to public safety managers so they can make public safety decisions in a timely and effective manner. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 requires the District to operate in accordance with Federal guidance that is normally issued in the form of structure Operating and Maintenance Manuals. The manuals federally direct the District to operate and maintain the structure and other equipment installed during construction in accordance with the standard in that manual. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and related laws require entities such as the District to protect those in a floodplain. In order to fulfill this requirement, monitoring is required to provide sufficient lead-time to allow evacuation of those in danger. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available. Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies. Number of sensor-days during which District ALERT system sensors are operational. Number of flood response plans completed. Number of sensor-days during which ALERT system sensors are needed. Number of flood response plans requested. Total activity expenditure per operational ALERT sensor-day. FY 2014 ACTUAL 99.4% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 99.0% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 98.6% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.4%) -0.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 245,865 247,379 248,505 248,902 1,523 0.6% 1 247,346 1 249,878 1 250,305 1 252,434 2,556 0.0% 1.0% $ 1 4.51 $ 1 5.06 $ 1 4.84 $ 1 5.03 $ 0.02 0.0% 0.5% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,107,810 $ 1,107,810 $ 1,253,213 $ 1,253,213 $ $ Expenditure $ 1,251,636 $ 1,251,636 $ 1,202,057 $ 1,202,057 (1,577) (1,577) -0.1% -0.1% Activity Narrative: New flood warning sensors were installed in FY 2015. Additionally, the District has started efforts to upgrade the flood warning network from ALERT to ALERT2 protocols. One new or substantially updated Flood Response Plan will be completed in FY 2016. Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide flood hazard information and solution services to government entities so they can utilize knowledge of flood hazards to protect the public and infrastructure. Program Results Measure Description Percent of linear miles of floodplains delineated. Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards. FY 2014 ACTUAL 68.6% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 68.8% 68.8% 40.3% 46.4% 21 46.4% FY 2016 ADOPTED 70.5% 42.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 1.8% 2.6% (4.2%) -9.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activities that comprise this program include: • • Flood Hazard Planning Floodplain Delineation Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services to municipalities and public agencies so they can have the information necessary to mitigate identified flood and erosion hazards. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Measure Description Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards. Cumulative square miles of Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed through the end of this fiscal year. Number of linear miles of watercourse where Watercourse Master Plans were completed this fiscal year. Number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year. Number of square miles of new Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year. Number of square miles of updated Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year. Total number of square miles identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans. Number of linear miles of watercourse identified for Watercourse Master Plans. Number of population in areas identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans. Total activity expenditure per number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year. FY 2014 ACTUAL 40.3% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 46.4% 46.4% FY 2016 ADOPTED 42.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (4.2%) -9.1% 3,163 3,652 3,652 3,557 (95) -2.6% - 27 27 20 (7) -25.9% 132,629 592,270 592,270 186,386 (405,884) -68.5% 180 164 164 394 230 140.2% 105 69 69 155 86 124.1% 7,877 7,877 7,877 8,271 394 5.0% 192 191 191 211 20 10.5% 3,731,063 3,808,082 3,808,082 3,917,447 109,365 2.9% $ 40.33 $ 10.18 $ 8.27 $ 29.41 $ (19.23) -188.9% 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - $ $ 500,000 500,000 $ $ 500,000 500,000 $ $ 345,000 345,000 $ $ (155,000) (155,000) -31.0% -31.0% 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 5,348,557 $ 5,348,557 $ 500,000 5,530,756 $ 6,030,756 $ 500,000 4,398,654 $ 4,898,654 $ 345,000 5,137,226 $ 5,482,226 $ 155,000 393,530 548,530 31.0% 7.1% 9.1% Revenue Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: Demand and Output is driven by changes in population, land development, emergent flooding issues, and technological improvements. Population density varies with each project, causing fluctuations in the number of residents that will benefit. These variable parameters in combination with the duration of individual studies that can vary and typically require multiple years to complete will then cause fluctuations in the Output from year to year. Population density varies with each project causing fluctuations in the number of residents and associated benefits. Studies expected 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District to be completed during FY 2015 include several urban/suburban watersheds. The studies expected to be completed in 2016 have a cumulative lower population, and as a result, the number of affected population is lower than FY 2015. The Area Drainage Master Studies (ADMS’s) that are currently underway and scheduled for the next year are within the more urban areas of Ahwatukee Foothills, Lower Indian Bend Wash, Middle Indian Bend Wash, East Fork Cave Creek, Paradise Valley/Scottsdale/Phoenix Shea Corridor, North Mesa, South Phoenix/Laveen, Tempe and various Design Concept Reports (DCR’s). Therefore, the affected populations demand is higher than in FY 2015. Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide National Floodplain Insurance Programbased flood hazard identification services to floodplain administrators so they can have the necessary information available to regulate floodplains. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3605, 48-3606, 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 REV VS ADOPTED FY 2016 Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of linear miles of floodplains 68.6% 68.8% 68.8% 70.5% 1.8% 2.6% delineated. Number of cumulative linear miles of 4,107 4,117 4,117 4,222 105 2.6% floodplains delineated through the end of the fiscal year. Linear miles of floodplains currently under 175 109 109 105 (4) -3.7% delineation study. Linear miles of floodplain delineated this fiscal 101 109 109 105 (4) -3.7% year. Total number of linear miles of floodplains 5,985 5,985 5,985 5,985 0.0% requiring delineation. Total activity expenditure per linear mile of $ 19,727.50 $ 20,483.96 $ 16,285.12 $ 21,196.07 $ (712.10) -3.5% floodplain delineated this fiscal year. 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 250,194 250,194 $ $ 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ - $ $ 159,134 1,839,262 $ 1,998,396 $ 2,232,752 $ 2,232,752 $ - $ $ - $ $ - N/A N/A 1,775,078 $ 1,775,078 $ 2,225,587 $ 2,225,587 $ 7,165 7,165 N/A 0.3% 0.3% Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: Demand for new delineations is generally consistent. The total potential miles of floodplain to be delineated countywide is essentially a fixed figure, subject to policy changes. Demand for re-delineations is generally driven by requests from municipalities and by need based on physical changes along a watercourse. Studies expected to be completed in FY2016 include both new delineations and re-delineations. Program output varies, as studies occasionally span fiscal years, and specific regions requiring new large-scale delineations may cause short-term aberrations. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year. Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features. Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year. Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies. Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days. Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days. Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year. FY 2014 ACTUAL 8.7% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 13.0% 13.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 0.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (12.9%) -99.2% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% (50.0%) -50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Control Structure Maintenance Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural flood protection services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can have increased physical protection from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 and 45-1424 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year. Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features. Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year. Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies. Number of capital projects completed this fiscal year. Number of Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year. Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones completed this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding. Number of square miles of area benefited by projects in current five-year Capital Improvement Program. Number of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects requested this fiscal year. Flood Control District REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (12.9%) -99.2% FY 2014 ACTUAL 8.7% FY 2015 REVISED 13.0% FY 2015 FORECAST 13.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 0.1% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% (50.0%) -50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% 5 3 3 2 (1) -33.3% 14 8 8 13 5 62.5% 3 5 5 7 2 40.0% 664 606 606 592 (14) -2.3% 14 8 8 13 5 62.5% 7 5 5 7 2 40.0% $ 9,013,096.60 $ 13,611,495.67 $ 13,176,765.00 $ 34,483,897.00 $ (20,872,401.33) 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ $ $ $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding. Total activity expenditure per capital project completed this fiscal year. $ 18,974,537 (14,696,402) 4,278,135 $ 35,700,000 (30,000,000) 5,700,000 $ 37,729,989 (30,000,000) 7,729,989 $ 68,648,616 -153.3% 32,948,616 92.3% (4,195,616) 28,753,000 14.0% 504.4% $ (4,328,923) (28,000,000) -14.0% -70.0% (34,195,616) 68,967,794 $ 4,195,616 (28,133,307) -14.0% -68.9% (34,195,616) 34,453,000 $ Expenditure $ 21,301,149 38,460,736 $ (14,696,402) 45,065,483 $ 30,834,487 40,000,000 $ (30,000,000) 40,834,487 $ 30,797,351 38,732,944 $ (30,000,000) 39,530,295 $ 35,163,410 68,000,000 Activity Narrative: Demand and Result are a function of the nature of projects in the Flood Control District’s five-year Capital Improvement Program, and the available funding for the program. The areas that benefit from projects can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on the number, size, type and location of the projects. Dam rehabilitation projects dramatically impact demand and results, as individual dam rehabilitation projects have very large corresponding benefited areas. As deficiencies in the dams are detected, rehabilitation projects are identified and cause large demand increases. Demand and expenditures do not directly correlate, as project cost is a function of construction techniques, project scope, land cost and other factors. The FY 2016 Capital Project Budget is larger than FY 2015 levels due to an influx of dam rehabilitation projects with funding assistance from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), as well as additional funding from a 2 cent property tax rate increase which will fund an additional $5.8 million of projects. 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity is to provide flood control infrastructure maintenance services that meet federal, state and local safety and operational standards for residents and visitors of Maricopa County so they can experience protection from flooding as a consequence of safe and well maintained flood control structures. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 45-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days. Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days. Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year. Number of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed. Number of Work Orders completed. Number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed. Number of dam assessments provided this fiscal year. Number of dam repair project milestones completed this fiscal year. Number of Work Order requests submitted. Number of dam assessments required this fiscal year. Number of dam repair project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year. Total activity expenditure per Work Order completed. FY 2014 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 97.4% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30 20 38 30 10 50.0% 917 83 680 47 869 53 993 83 313 36 46.0% 76.6% 22 22 22 22 - 0.0% 1 - - 1 1 N/A 1,015 22 758 22 927 22 993 22 235 - 31.0% 0.0% 2 - - 1 1 N/A $ 8,002.26 $ 16,365.48 $ 11,231.55 $ 11,646.16 $ 4,719.32 28.8% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 2,000 2,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ (58,150) (58,150) -100.0% -100.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 7,338,071 $ 7,338,071 $ 11,564,635 $ 11,564,635 $ $ (436,107) (436,107) -3.9% -3.9% 58,150 58,150 51,628 51,628 Expenditure $ 11,128,528 $ 11,128,528 $ 9,760,216 $ 9,760,216 Activity Narrative: The District owns, operates and maintains 83 flood control structures; including 22 dams/flood retarding structures totaling 64 miles in length, 150 miles of channels and levees, 250 acres of basins and 40 acres of general flood hazard mitigation property. Flood control structures require regular inspections and maintenance to function as designed and provide the maximum flood protection. This maintenance is performed by the staff of the District’s Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Division. This year the district is adding the Loop 303 project to the maintenance program; this structure is 4.5 miles in length. The District’s most significant structures are approaching their design life; maintenance costs will continue to increase on a long-term basis to extend the life of these structures. Increases in expenditures for this activity will be due to a need to an increase maintenance personnel and contracted repair work. 26 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Beginning in FY 2016 for Tax Year 2015, Flood Control District Tax Levy the Flood Control District secondary Net Assessed Tax Rate property tax will no longer assess property Value (per $100 valuation based on full cash value, but Fiscal Year (Thousands) N.A.V.) instead on limited property value and will 2007 32,778,027 0.2047 have a growth cap of 5% on property taxed 2008 45,937,945 0.1533 in the prior year. This change in property 2009 54,751,263 0.1367 tax collections is due to a voter approved 2010 54,862,329 0.1367 Proposition 117 that was approved in 2011 45,681,391 0.1489 2012. Previously, secondary net assessed 2012 35,056,838 0.1780 values of real and personal property had 2013 30,665,493 0.1780 no constitutional limitation on growth. The 2014 28,622,833 0.1392 Flood Control District Board of Directors 2015 31,339,191 0.1392 chose to impose growth limitations similar 2016 31,100,587 0.1592 to those imposed on the primary levy resulting in a 2% cap annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Tax Levy 67,096,622 70,422,870 74,674,333 74,996,804 68,019,592 62,401,172 54,584,578 39,842,985 43,660,332 49,512,136 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2016. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2015 to FY 2016. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate for FY 2016 will increase to $0.1592 per $100 net assessed value. 60 $0.2500 50 $0.2000 40 $0.1500 30 $0.1000 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0500 10 0 $06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Fiscal Year The FY 2016 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $49,512,136, an increase from the FY 2015 Adopted Levy. FY 2016 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY: FY 2016 Adopted FY 2015 Adopted FY 2015 Variance $ $ $ 31,100,587,859 $ 31,365,181,149 $ (264,593,290) $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP 116,866,656 $ 109,541,563 $ 7,325,093 $ Revenue from 1-cent Levy 31,217,454,515 $ 31,474,722,712 $ (257,268,197) $ 27 3,121,745 $ 3,147,472 $ (25,727) $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.1592 $ 0.1392 $ 0.0200 $ 49,512,136 $ 43,660,332 $ 5,851,804 $ 186,052 $ 152,482 $ 33,570 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 49,698,188 43,812,814 5,885,374 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Levy Limit FY 2016 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2016 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 44,069,533 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.1417 FY 2016 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 49,512,136 0.1592 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ FY 2016 Median Residential Limited Property Value $ "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ (5,442,603) -12.4% (0.0175) 116,078 16.45 18.48 (2.03) -12.3% FY 2016 FLOOD CONTROL SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY VS. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2016 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 93,954,876 0.3021 FY 2016 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP): Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 49,512,136 0.1592 Amount Under Limit: $ 44,442,740 0.1429 28 47.3% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2015: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2016: Median Residential Limited Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ 119,600 0.1392 16.65 116,078 0.1592 18.48 (1.83) -11.0% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2016 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2016. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2016 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 49,512,136 $ 48,917,990 Rate 98.8% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2014 actual, the FY 2015 forecast and the FY 2016 budget revenue for this category. FY 2014 revenue was higher than FY 2015 forecast and FY 2016 budget due to an increase in granting District easement right of way. Licenses and Permits Revenue $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $FY 2014 Actual FY 2015 Forecast FY 2016 Budget Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2016 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of SRP’s increase in estimated net assessed value. Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2016 budget is reflective of receiving $34,453,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. FY 2014 and 2015 revenues are higher than budgeted for FY 2016 due to increased land sales during these fiscal years. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2007 199,736 2008 149,582 2009 135,796 2010 144,249 2011 156,110 2012 186,613 2013 192,535 2014 151,252 2015* 152,482 2016** 186,052 * Forecast ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $FY 2014 Actual FY 2015 Forecast FY 2016 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfer $40 $35 $(Millions) $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 2014 2015 30 2016 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Flood Control District fund balances are “Restricted”. Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ $ $ Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ FY 2015 ADOPTED - FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ - $ - (171,060) $ 330,194 159,134 $ - $ $ $ 500,000 500,000 $ $ 500,000 500,000 $ 345,000 345,000 159,134 159,134 $ - $ 500,000 500,000 $ 500,000 500,000 $ 345,000 345,000 (171,060) $ - $ - $ - $ - 37,500 37,500 $ $ 37,500 37,500 $ $ - $ $ - - $ $ Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2015 FORECAST $ 39,889,983 $ 29,943,735 $ 29,943,735 $ 33,496,573 $ 17,048,755 $ 41,251,560 74,236 41,325,796 $ 44,021,673 44,021,673 $ 44,021,673 44,021,673 $ 44,050,711 44,050,711 $ 49,642,254 49,642,254 $ $ 30,498,529 30,000,000 60,498,529 $ $ 32,495,393 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ $ 32,495,393 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ $ 27,647,232 20,071,995 47,719,227 $ 32,495,393 34,195,616 66,691,009 Structural Balance $ 13,604,328 $ 11,526,280 $ 11,526,280 $ 13,552,182 $ 17,146,861 Accounting Adjustments $ 21 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 33,496,573 33,496,573 $ $ 11,470,015 11,470,015 $ $ 11,470,015 11,470,015 $ $ 17,048,755 17,048,755 $ $ - Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ 31 $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 26,994,074 $ 22,004,846 $ 22,004,846 $ 7,507,905 $ 6,504,950 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 18,974,537 18,974,537 $ 35,700,000 35,700,000 $ 35,700,000 35,700,000 $ 37,729,989 37,729,989 $ 68,648,616 68,648,616 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 38,460,736 38,460,736 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 $ 38,732,944 38,732,944 $ 68,000,000 68,000,000 Accounting Adjustments $ 30 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 7,507,905 7,507,905 $ $ 17,704,846 17,704,846 $ $ 17,704,846 17,704,846 $ $ 6,504,950 6,504,950 $ $ 7,153,566 7,153,566 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Grants Fund (989) NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants FEMA Grant - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 500,000 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ (500,000) $ (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) $ - $ - $ 345,000 $ 345,000 345,000 345,000 $ 345,000 $ 345,000 C-69-15-017-G-00 Agenda Item: C-69-15-017-G-00 FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Grants FEMA Grant - $ Agenda Item: FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants FEMA Grant $ Agenda Item: C-69-15-017-G-00 FY 2016 Adopted Budget 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 44,021,673 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 44,021,673 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 32,495,393 $ 44,021,673 $ (13,029) $ (13,029) 13,029 $ (41,742) 54,771 - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges Increase Risk Mangement Charges Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Interest Revenue Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes Agenda Item: $ $ 54,771 $ - $ - $ - (80,314) (80,314) 5,700,895 (150,000) 33,570 5,817,325 32,495,393 $ 0.0% 49,642,254 12.8% $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ Revenue Expenditures NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 30,000,000 $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 30,000,000 $ - $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) - $ - $ - $ 34,195,616 $ 34,195,616 - $ 34,195,616 $ - Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 40,000,000 $ 5,700,000 $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) (5,700,000) (5,700,000) $ - $ - $ 66,000,000 $ 66,000,000 34,453,000 34,453,000 $ 66,000,000 $ 34,453,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 - $ 68,000,000 $ Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2016 Tentative Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget Expenditures 34,453,000 Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ - $ 30,000,000 $ - $ - (30,000,000) (30,000,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - 34,195,616 34,195,616 $ - $ 34,195,616 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ FY 2015 Revised Budget $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 30,000,000 30,000,000 $ - $ - $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) (34,195,616) (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) $ (34,195,616) Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund - Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by A.R.S. Title 48 in accordance with District Resolution 2010R008, which specifies the Board’s financial management directives for the District. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Project Description • Funding Commitment and Agency Priority • Flood Control/Drainage Master Plan Element • Flooding Threat • Level of Protection • Area Protected • Ancillary Benefits • Level of Partnership Participation • Operations and Maintenance Costs to the District The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promotes community development, protects natural habitats and maintains watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 2 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2016, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: Previous 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total $ $ Projected Actuals 1,195,194 $ 213,448,095 214,643,289 $ FY 2015 1,565,339 $ 37,167,605 38,732,944 $ Year 1 Year 2 FY 2016 3,050,000 $ 64,950,000 68,000,000 $ FY 2017 2,000,000 $ 300,000 60,700,000 63,000,000 $ Year 3 FY 2018 2,000,000 $ 300,000 46,700,000 49,000,000 $ Year 4 FY 2019 2,000,000 $ 300,000 31,700,000 34,000,000 $ Year 5 FY 2020 2,000,000 $ 300,000 31,700,000 34,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 11,050,000 $ 1,200,000 235,750,000 248,000,000 $ Total Project 13,810,533 1,200,000 486,365,700 501,376,233 Strategic Business Planning (SBP) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By June 30th, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Projects Program submittals. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Result Measures: FY 2014 Actual Measure Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year. 8.7% FY 2015 Forecast 13.0% FY 2016 Projected with Capital Improvement 0.1% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 592 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADMS – Area Drainage Master Study ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation SPAP – Small Projects Assistance Program CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service Indian Bend Wash 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: District Scheduled Completion ALERT2 System Upgrade Project All FY 2016 Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements 1 Outside 5-year CIP Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements 1 Outside 5-year CIP Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements Improvement 4 Outside 5-year CIP 27 Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin 5 FY 2017 Rittenhouse Basin 1 Complete Berneil Channel Modifications 2 FY 2020 Chandler Heights Basin 1 Outside 5-year CIP 1,2 Outside 5-year CIP Tres Rios 5 Complete White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet 4 Outside 5-year CIP White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2017 McMicken Dam 4 Outside 5-year CIP th East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Guadalupe FRS Rehabilitation 1,5 Outside 5-year CIP Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2017 Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain 4 Outside 5-year CIP Watson Drainage System 4 Outside 5-year CIP Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements 2 FY 2019 PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement 1 FY 2018 Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation 4 Outside 5-year CIP Saddleback FRS Modifications 5 Outside 5-year CIP Cave Buttes Dam Modifications 3 Outside 5-year CIP I-17/Skunk Creek Land Rights Acquisition and Access Improvement 3 FY 2020 New River Dam Outlet Improvements 4 Outside 5-year CIP Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain 2 Outside 5-year CIP Ellsworth Road & McKellips Road Drainage System 2 Outside 5-year CIP 115 Avenue Drainage Improvements/Union Hills Drive 4 Outside 5-year CIP Bullard Wash (Phase II) 4 Outside 5-year CIP Loop 303 Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2015 Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements 4 Outside 5-year CIP Sonoqui Wash Channelization Phase II (Chandler Heights to Riggs) 1 FY 2020 Sonoqui Wash Channelization Phase II (Main Branch) 1 FY 2016 5 Outside 5-year CIP 5 Outside 5-year CIP th th DRCC (107 Avenue to Agua Fria) th DRCC (75 Avenue to 107th Avenue) 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District District Scheduled Completion 5 FY 2018 Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79 Avenue to 59 Avenue) 5 Outside 5-year CIP Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) 5 FY 2014 Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III 3 Outside 5-year CIP Circle K Park Detention Basin 5 Outside 5-year CIP Ashbrook Wash Channelization 2 Outside 5-year CIP 1, 2 Outside 5-year CIP Improvement th Van Buren St. Channel (99 Avenue to Agua Fria River) th th East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: ALERT2 System Upgrade Project (017A) Project Partner: N/A The Flood Control District of Maricopa County operates a 24-hour rain, stream and weather gauge network which provides "real-time" information to the County and many other agencies about rainfall, floods and weather conditions in Maricopa County. This network operates in the National Weather Service ALERT (Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time) format and is commonly referred to as an ALERT system. The ALERT system uses "automatic" telemetry gauges for data collection. Data is also used to reconstruct storm events in order to show the origin of flooding problems and to provide data for use in floodplain studies, computer modeling of watersheds and design of future flood control structures. ALERT2 is the new standard protocol designed to replace the existing ALERT. ALERT2 provides a graceful transition of real-time data collection systems from providing slow, lean, error-prone environmental data to receiving fast, information-rich, error-free knowledge about events in the real world. It differs from ALERT in that it is much faster, carries more information, and operates virtually error free. Using a channel sharing technique called TDMA, where each transmitter has its own brief time slot in which to transmit, the message contention and data loss problems of ALERT can be minimized. It has a large enough ID space to eliminate the ID assignment problems common in some areas of the country. Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tail water system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project involves installation of 15 catch basins, Ivanhoe Drain slope realignment, and new storm drain construction to eliminate all discharges into Chandler Drain. Project corrects the flooding problem in the flat downtown area, removes connection to SRP tail water drainage system and improves measures associated with MS4 Phase II permit. Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Tempe Project was recommended within the Broadway/Rural Drain Master Plan. Historic flooding has occurred in the Loma Vista neighborhood. The project area is primarily single family residential and is characterized by minimal relief with slopes of less than 0.1%. Mitigate flooding of 21 homes in the area during the 100-year storm event by constructing a series of storm drains in Loma Vista, Alameda and Los Feliz Drives with an outfall into an expanded detention basin at the Northwest corner of McClintock High school. Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Construction schedule is dependent upon City funding. The FY 2015 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin (117C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District has previously identified several detention basins and storm drain systems in the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP (1997). Information on flooding and flood-prone areas was generated through this study. Project includes constructing a detention basin that will be designed for a 100-year level of protection and is a part of the overall drainage system plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP area. The basin will provide flood protection for residential developments existing and planned for the area and may have multi-use recreational amenities. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Berneil Channel Modifications Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley The Berneil Channel generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at approximately the 66th Street alignment. The existing channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. Channel improvements are needed to increase channel capacity to convey a 10-year to 100-year rain event. Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. The Rittenhouse Basin mitigates flows from the upstream EMF. Construction of the basin and flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active as the District contributes limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. Chandler Heights Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction of the detention basin is being accomplished in phases. The first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as District funding becomes available. East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Project Partner: N/A The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications. Tres Rios (126A) Project Partners: City of Phoenix and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project consists of the reestablishment of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands, open water marshes and riparian corridors, and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The project consists of north bank levee improvements, channelization, and habitat areas composed of open water marshes and overbank wetlands from 105th Avenue to El Mirage Road. Also, a pump station has been constructed that will provide water to the habitat areas. Construction is complete. FEMA coordination and a Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway are in progress. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Construction will involve an outlet pipe from the White Tanks FRS No.4 to the Loop 303 Outfall channel that ultimately discharges to the Gila River. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The NRCS identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004, and the District has entered into an IGA with NRCS to accomplish project construction. 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Rehabilitation will mitigate existing dam deficiencies and extend the functional life of the structure. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is complete. Phase two work includes removing the left auxiliary spillway by extending the left abutment of the dam to the north, widening the right auxiliary spillway to accommodate the removal of the left spillway and re-grading the flood pool. McMicken Dam Project (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives include a modified dam section, floodways, outlet and spillways which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. Project is being completed through nine separate construction phases. Guadalupe FRS Rehabilitation (205A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Guadalupe Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) is an earthen structure consisting of three dams, North Dam No. 1, North Dam No. 2 and East Dam. The FRS detains floodwater at the mouth of Pima Wash and releases it to the Western Canal via an underground pipe. The reservoir pool is grass-lined and used for part of the golf course for the Arizona Grand Resort. The structure is 2,910 feet in length and has a height of 35 feet, with a storage capacity of 252 acre-feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor. Through routine O&M, the District has identified exposure and corrosion of reinforcing steel within intake structure, deterioration of principal spillway through dam embankment, structural defects of principal spillway downstream of dam embankment, and lack of a filter diaphragm around spillway in dam embankment. Dam rehabilitation work will include the replacement of the intake structure, installatoin of filter diaphragm around principal spillway, slip line existing principal spillway through dam and slip line the existing principal spillway downstream of the dam. Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking since being constructed in the 70's. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. phases and Phase 1 is currently in construction. Construction will be accomplished in two Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The City of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. The project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Watson Drainage System (211B) Project Partner: City of Buckeye The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended a backbone drainage conveyance system with an outfall to the river for future development in the eastern portion of Buckeye. Project includes several branches of channels, culverts and detention basins spanning more than 10 miles, draining from the Roosevelt Irrigation District canal on the north to the Gila River on the south. The project will be implemented in phases. The District will be responsible for final design and construction of the downstream portion that provides the outfall from the north side of the Union Pacific Railroad to the Gila River. Buckeye will implement the upstream portions through future development and capital projects. Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The city initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. With the city as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the selection of an outfall alignment south of McKellips Road by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC). 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The project will construct infrastructure to intercept storm water flows from the Granite Reef Watershed and convey them to the Salt River. Project also eliminates a 100-year flood hazard affecting at least 1,200 property owners within Scottsdale alone. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the SRPMIC’s undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route Loop 101 and State Route Loop 202. PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the NRCS, the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the State Route Loop 202. The ADWR recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. Project pre-design is complete. The selected alternative involves rehabilitating Vineyard Road FRS, converting Rittenhouse FRS to a levee and replacing the Powerline FRS with a system of channels. Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS is a compact earth-fill dam which detains floodwater from the southwest side of the Big Horn Mountains, the Harquahala Plain and Saddle Mountain. The water is conveyed to the Harquahala Floodway and the Saddleback Diversion Channel and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 11.5 miles in length. Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides a comprehensive rock mulch and hydro seed treatment for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon District funding availability. Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for the initial construction. 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. The Cave Buttes Dam is an earth-fill structure, complemented by a system of three earthen dikes, which impound storm water runoff from Cave Creek Wash. Constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the dam and dike system has provided flood protection for downstream properties. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modifications will consist of two major features. The first planned improvement (Phase I) will be a drainage tunnel gated outlet and channel, which will decrease the time it takes for the water collected behind the dam to drain. The second planned improvement (Phase II) will be a system to collect water that has seeped through the dam and foundation. I-17/Skunk Creek Land rights Acquisition and Access Improvements (361A) Project Partner: N/A In the early 1980's, two levees and channel improvements were constructed in Skunk Creek. The levees are located near Interstate-17 at approximately the Jomax Road alignment. The levees are maintained by the District. District staff has identified the need to secure additional land rights to improve access for routine inspections, repairs & maintenance activities of Skunk Creek in the vicinity of Interstate 17. New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370A) Project Partner: N/A The District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the New River Dam and associated works in 1985 as part of the New River and Phoenix City Streams Flood Control Project, providing enhanced flood protection for downstream Maricopa County residents, and the District operates and maintains the dam. Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project will include construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. 115th Avenue/Union Hills Drive Drainage Improvements (450G) Project Partner: City of Peoria and City of Surprise The project is located in the Lower Agua Fria watershed and is part of the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update (ADMPU). The study area extends from Beardsley Road to south of Bell Road between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River. The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The project will be constructed in three phases. Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear Bullard Wash is included within the State Route Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), which recommends improvements be made to the wash. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This stormwater would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Phase I of the Bullard Wash Improvements Project has been completed and included construction of an earthen and gabion basket -lined channel from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road. Phase II will be implemented as funds become available and includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment, which is located between Estrella Parkway and Bullard Avenue, from Lower Buckeye Road to Interstate 10. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: City of Goodyear, MCDOT and ADOT The State Route Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for storm water management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303 Loop (SR-303L). The new outfall drainage system will collect and carry stormwater runoff to the Gila River and reduce the chance of property damage and flooding the future freeway and adjacent areas during a major storm event. Drainage improvements include construction of a concrete-lined channel, box culverts, storm drain pipe, retaining walls and landscaping. Additional improvements include street and irrigation system reconstruction for the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) and Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District (BWCDD). Project construction is currently in progress. Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements (470L) Project Partner: Luke Air Force Base This project is an element generated from the State Route Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan Update. The project will mitigate an existing delineated flooding hazard on and adjacent to Luke Air Force Base (AFB). Approximately 250 acres of on-base facilities within existing flood zones will be removed from the floodplain which includes aircraft hangars, command posts, control tower, simulator complex, dorms and drinking wells. An additional 300 acres of commercial/industrial/agricultural property south of the base limits would be protected. The project includes rehabilitating and improving the existing storm drain system to collect and convey 100-year flows from sensitive areas on the base to the improved channel system, contain those flows within the channel system and provide a connection to the existing regional outfall. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Town of Queen Creek and MCDOT The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2009, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The channel will collect and convey the 100-year flow to reduce 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District flooding hazards to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. The project includes channelization of existing wash from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road along the existing alignment, and the east branch from Hawes Road to Crismon Road along Riggs Road. The total length of the project is approximately 3.5 miles. The channel will be earth-lined with rock slope protection with 4:1 to 8:1 side slopes and a 50-foot bottom width. The project will include multi-use components such as equestrian and pedestrian trails. Phase IIB (Ellsworth Road to Crismon Road) construction will occur in the future by the Town of Queen Creek and the project remains active so District construction management can occur when the next phase is implemented. The project is anticipated to remove the existing floodplain extending from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, which includes 71 acres of land and 68 properties. Queen Creek operates and maintains the facility. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: N/A The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2009, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase, completed in FY 2013, includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Rd. to Riggs Rd., and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. The third phase of channelization includes the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northwest to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is located in unincorporated Maricopa County. Phase III is being constructed in two phases in which the first was completed in May 2012. Main Branch Phase IIIA1 from Riggs Road to Empire Boulevard and Phase IIIA2 from Empire Blvd to Hunt Highway in Pinal County construction is to be completed in October 2013. The West Branch Phase IIIB construction scheduled to begin during FY 2015. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain, and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. This phase of the DRCC will construct a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. This phase of the project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will construct basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. Upon completion, the project will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. Van Buren Street Channel - 99th Avenue to Agua Fria River (565D) Project Partner: City of Avondale A design concept study was completed and the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. The Van Buren Street Channel will be designed to provide a drainage system along Van Buren Street carrying storm water west of 99th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The channel project will improve storm water drainage in the Avondale City Center at Avondale Boulevard (115th Avenue) and Van Buren Street, and solve other crucial drainage issues for current and future development along Van Buren Street. When completed, the channel will provide flood hazard protection up to the 10-year storm event (10% chance of occurring in a year). Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale Project is a recommendation from the District’s completed Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The storm drain will collect and convey sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project was a recommended component of the Metro ADMP. This project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. The project’s involves the installation of storm drains and other various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. Project will be complete during FY 2014 but will remain active to complete the final archeological report. 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase, which was completed by the City of Phoenix, constructed the system outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvement Project. The second phase, also completed, constructed interceptor drains in Lafayette Boulevard. and Camelback Road. This third phase of the Arcadia Area Improvement project will include construction of interceptor storm drains, primarily in Arcadia Drive. This project will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. Circle K Park Detention Basin Project Partner: City of Phoenix The proposed project was a recommendation with the Hohokam ADMP. Rainfall runoff from the South Mountain area flows from the south to the north towards the highline canal. Stormwater overtops the canal and floods properties to the north. The project will construct a 35 ac-ft detention basin and will provide storage for a 10-year event. Properties and structures downstream will be benefited. Ashbrook Wash Improvements (670A) Project Partner: Town of Fountain Hills Ashbrook Wash is the largest watercourse within the Town of Fountain Hills, having a watershed area of 13.06 square miles. The District’s 1995 Floodplain Delineation Study for Fountain Hills showed deficiencies at the Golden Eagle Park Dam on Ashbrook Wash, due to overtopping and potential dam failure. Dam safety improvements were made to the Golden Eagle Park Dam in year 2000 to prevent its overtopping and failure in the 1/2 Probable Maximum Flood. However, those improvements increased the regulatory 100-year peak flow downstream. The Ashbrook Wash Improvement Project is expected to include replacing two culvert crossings (at Bayfield Drive and Saguaro Boulevard), as well as cleaning and channelizing Ashbrook Wash as necessary to ensure it can safely convey flood flows. Once completed, properties adjacent to Ashbrook Wash between Bayfield Drive and Del Cambre Avenue will be protected from flooding caused by 100year flows through the wash, or flows that have a one percent chance of occurring in any given year. The design and construction are being coordinated with the Saguaro Boulevard Reconstruction Project. East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. Auxiliary Budget Line (FCIP) Project Partner: N/A Several District projects did not have accounting lines at the time of this document’s preparation and were placed under this function code. 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Project Sources by Project 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 117C - 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 202B - 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 343A - 3430131 WICKENBURG DOWNTOWN 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 470F - 4700432 WHITE TANKS 3 OUTLET 470K - 4701132 LOWER EL MIRAGE WASH 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 480E - 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 620F - 6200333 CAMELBACK 59TH TO 75TH 625M - 6250233 LAFAYETTE DRAIN 670A - 6700130 ASHBROOK WASH CHANNEL FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total $ Uses by Project 017A - 0170630 ALERT2 SYST UPGRADE 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 027A - 0271032 UPPER CAMELBACK WASH 109A - 109 02 30 AGUA FRIA LEVEE IMP 117A - 1170831 LAVEEN AREA CONV CHAN 117C - 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 121A - 1210332 RITTENHOUSE BASIN 121B - 1210333 CHANDLER HEIGHTS BASIN 126A - 1260131 TRES RIOS 201A - 2010131 WHITE TANKS 4 OUTLET 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 202B - 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 204A - 2040130 MCMICKEN DAM OUT IMPR 205A - 2050130 GUADALUPE FRS REHAB 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 211A - 2110331 DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 265A - 2650130 GRANITE REEF WASH 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 331A - 3310130 SADDLEBACK FRS MOD 343A - 3430131 WICKENBURG DOWNTOWN 350B - 3500130 CAVE BUTTES DAM MOD 361A - 3610130 SKUNK CREEK AT I17 370A - 3700130 NEW RIVER DAM OUTLET 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 420E - 4200531 ELLSWORTH MCKELLIPS 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470D - 4701331 BULLARD WASH PH II 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 470F - 4700432 WHITE TANKS 3 OUTLET 470H - 4701531 NORTHERN PKWY PH I 470K - 4701132 LOWER EL MIRAGE WASH 470L - 4701630 LUKE AFB FLOOD MITIG 480B - 4800531 QUEEN CK RKR TO HIGLEY 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 480E - 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 565B - 5650432 DRCC AVONDALE 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 565D - 5650435 VNBRN CHNL 99TH TO AFR 620F - 6200333 CAMELBACK 59TH TO 75TH 620G - 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH 625J - 6250130 DOWNTOWN PHOENIX PH I 625L - 6250232 ARCADIA DR STRM DRAN 625M - 6250233 LAFAYETTE DRAIN 670A - 6700130 ASHBROOK WASH CHANNEL F700 - FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP FCPR - PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD Project Total Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Actuals FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 4,500,000 110,000 4,610,000 $ Year 4 295,500 840,675 3,553,440 57,046 281,546 4,164,396 25,000 140,000 144,000 643,078 198,035 181,150 3,546,638 871,619 2,279,605 7,124,146 2,450,627 37,500 26,834,001 $ Previous Actuals $ 3,049 7,970,047 1,299,243 663,589 2,483,917 8,725,948 3,041,193 1,689,701 807,925 8,989,920 3,726,615 5,501,462 1,083,723 700,932 1,000 2,897,139 7,548,271 1,103,446 10,429,670 1,707,900 42,917 13,007 911,344 125,663 672,957 109,966 34,670,041 29,170,291 5,675,201 2,476,183 18,781 451,400 18,530,975 14,141,929 91,790 6,026,595 5,833 13,201,909 11,217 5,387,908 10,676,440 154,423 1,500 212,942,960 $ 6,105,745 459,244 410,000 380,000 375,000 7,729,989 $ Projected 8,255,000 14,400,000 350,000 11,125,000 135,000 188,000 34,453,000 $ Year 1 770,000 6,750,000 3,375,000 18,750,000 188,000 29,833,000 $ Year 2 770,000 24,000,000 24,770,000 $ Year 3 FY 2015 266,200 1,000 2,384,929 1,000 547 15,309 22,544 1,000 4,062 560 3,943 1,962,516 1,099,778 80,426 11,322,037 1,021 336,507 8,717 1,328,758 5,210 1,241 452,265 43,428 3,048 1,804 1,101 852,131 2,162 7,469,526 1,161 1,781 (88) 1,302 4,050 4,051,296 5,279 77 1,057,153 1,000 1,454,636 2,000 2 899,577 1,000 2,000,000 37,152,996 $ FY 2016 30,000 2,000 2,000 210,000 2,000 10,000 3,000 2,000 9,875,000 1,285,000 760,000 2,000 24,615,000 2,000 780,000 25,000 17,875,000 2,000 765,000 2,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 3,820,000 5,000 345,000 4,000 2,000 2,112,000 2,000 2,000 25,000 2,000 60,000 2,000 1,795,000 6,000 505,000 64,945,000 $ FY 2017 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,395,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 13,385,000 1,230,000 402,000 2,000 9,955,000 2,000 780,000 25,000 29,800,000 2,000 357,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 25,000 2,000 60,000 2,000 2,000 300,000 2,000 225,000 60,995,000 $ FY 2018 252,000 2,000 2,000 1,100,000 2,000 10,000 5,000 8,525,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 1,030,000 35,000 34,325,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,125,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 35,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 300,000 4,000 198,000 46,990,000 $ 54 FY 2019 2,000 3,000 3,000 10,000 4,525,000 7,355,000 5,000 3,000 28,000 1,550,000 555,000 7,005,000 3,000 5,265,000 210,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,585,000 3,000 1,010,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 35,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 300,000 296,000 1,210,000 31,990,000 $ Year 5 FY 2020 85,000 175,000 3,035,000 3,295,000 $ Year 5 FY 2020 2,000 3,000 3,000 10,000 7,005,000 8,175,000 3,000 783,000 25,000 1,550,000 2,915,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,020,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 4,288,000 2,720,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 300,000 1,068,000 1,085,000 31,990,000 $ 5-Year Total Total 85,000 1,540,000 15,005,000 17,775,000 350,000 58,375,000 310,000 376,000 3,145,000 96,961,000 $ 5-Year Project 85,000 1,835,500 840,675 18,558,440 57,046 23,880,745 631,546 58,375,000 4,164,396 25,000 140,000 913,244 1,053,078 198,035 181,150 4,302,638 871,619 2,279,605 7,124,146 2,450,627 412,500 3,145,000 131,524,990 Total Total 284,000 10,000 12,000 5,705,000 12,000 44,000 3,000 11,539,000 23,260,000 26,570,000 1,175,000 792,000 34,570,000 59,000 5,690,000 3,555,000 89,005,000 12,000 6,389,000 216,000 15,000 12,000 12,000 7,540,000 18,000 345,000 3,030,000 14,000 12,000 2,112,000 14,000 4,296,000 2,840,000 12,000 120,000 12,000 1,805,000 1,200,000 1,376,000 3,223,000 236,910,000 $ Project 550,200 14,049 10,354,976 13,000 1,299,790 6,383,898 2,506,461 8,738,948 3,089,255 1,693,261 12,350,868 34,212,436 31,396,393 1,255,426 792,000 51,393,499 1,143,744 6,727,439 3,564,717 93,230,897 7,553,481 1,116,687 10,429,670 8,549,165 302,345 31,055 925,148 138,764 9,065,088 130,128 42,484,567 29,171,452 8,706,982 2,476,095 34,083 451,400 18,547,025 20,305,225 111,069 10,322,672 3,902,986 13,201,909 24,217 6,962,544 14,000 10,676,442 2,859,000 1,200,000 1,378,500 5,223,000 487,005,956 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: District Scheduled Completion 1 FY 2016 2 Avenue and Solomon Drainage 2 FY 2016 Emerald Acres Drainage 2 FY 2016 Royal Palms Drainage 2 FY 2016 2 FY 2016 th 2 FY 2016 th 5 FY 2016 7 Avenue and Dobbins Storm 5 FY 2016 8525 East Pinnacle Peak Road 2 FY 2016 Paradise Drive Storm Drain 2 FY 2016 East 3 Avenue and N. Craftsman Ct. 2 FY 2016 Jerry Street and Rimrock Road 4 FY 2016 Improvement Coldwater Boulevard Channel nd th 9 Avenue and Horne Detention 10 Avenue and Sirrine Drainage 16 Street and Violet Drive Storm th rd Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects (F699) Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. In accordance with Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) Resolution 2009R003A, the District prioritizes and funds potential local flood control capital projects through its annual Small Project Assistance Program. The Small Project Assistance Program has three purposes: • • • Facilitate the mitigation of flood hazards that are local in nature but pose a risk to the citizens and property of Maricopa County. Using consistent, published criteria, objectively evaluate submitted local flood control capital projects requested by municipalities. Allow for the rapid implementation of recommended local flood control capital projects with minimal administrative delay. 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Coldwater Boulevard Channel (69C1) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert Project will excavate and construct a 20' x 600' gabion-lined channel, construct approximately 115 LF of 2' X 6' CBC and demo 2 existing driveways. 2nd Avenue and Solomon Drainage (69C2) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project will construct a series of storm drain parallel to Solomon and Miller Streets and a detention basin at 2nd Street and Solomon. Emerald Acres Drainage (69C3) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project will construct approximately 1,325 LF of 18" storm drain, provide connections to existing infrastructure and construct manholes and catch basins. Royal Palms Drainage (69C4) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project will construct flap gates and manholes to alleviate flooding due to water backing up out of the lake and the city storm drain system. 9th Avenue and Horne Detention (69C5) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project will construct a detention basin and dry well at the corner of 9th Avenue and Horne. 10th Avenue and Sirrine Drainage (69C6) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project will construct approximately 355 LF of 18" and 30" storm drain and catch basins within 10th Avenue. 16th Street and Violet Drive Storm (69C7) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project will construct a new storm drain 36-inch to 48-inch in Violet Street to connect to the existing 48-inch storm drain in 16th Street. 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 7th Avenue and Dobbins Storm (69C8) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The project will construct approximately 4,000 LF of 30" drain at Dobbins Road and Montezuma Street west to 7th Avenue and Dobbins Road. 8525 East Pinnacle Peak Road (69C9) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale Project will construct an 18-inch high flood wall adjacent to the south side of the sidewalk along the property frontage. Paradise Drive Storm Drain (69C10) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale Project will construct catch basins and a 30" storm drain in Paradise Drive from 67th Street to 68th Street. East 3rd Avenue and N. Craftsman Ct. (69C11) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale Project will re-grade a portion of the roadway and widen the existing concrete channel between the sidewalk and the landscaped island at 7117 East 3rd Avenue. Jerry Street and Rimrock Road (69C12) Project Partner: City of Surprise Project will construct a retention basin along with several dry wells. Uses by Small Project Previous Uses by Project F699 - SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE PRGM Project Total Projected Actuals $ - $ FY 2015 1,336,000 1,336,000 $ Year 1 Year 2 FY 2016 3,050,000 3,050,000 $ FY 2017 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ Year 3 FY 2018 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ Year 4 FY 2019 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ Year 5 FY 2020 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 11,050,000 11,050,000 $ Total Project 12,386,000 12,386,000 Project Description: 700.XX.X1 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Unallocated In many areas development took place prior to floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary sale to the Flood Control District of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. 57 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Adopt the Library District Fiscal Year 2016 Budget in the amount of $29,489,719 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Library District. 59 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Steve Chucri, Chairman, District 2 Denny Barney, District 1 Andy Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The Library District FY 2016 revenue budget is $25,347,613 and the expenditure budget is $29,489,719. The tax levy for FY 2016 will decrease from $19,504,284 to $19,250,761, a decrease of $253,523 from FY 2015. The tax rate for FY 2016 will remain flat at $0.0556 per $100 of assessed value, while the net assessed value is decreasing by $455,976,270 from FY 2015 to FY 2016. The property tax revenue is decreasing by 1.2%, and all public libraries in Maricopa County will be utilizing the Polaris library system resulting in a substantial cost savings. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2014 through FY 2016 $22,000,000 $20,000,000 Access to digital materials remains a focus as the demand continues to increase. The Library District has responded with additional digital resources, providing 24 hour access to streaming and downloading. Digital circulation has increased by 34% from FY 2015. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2014 Actual FY 2015 Forecast FY 2016 Budget Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 22, 2015, the Maricopa County Library District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2016 Budget totaling $29,489,719. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 17, 2015, the Maricopa County Board of Directors approved the FY 2016 Tax Levy and Rate. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to reading, exploring and discovering for all so they can be lifelong learners. Vision Maricopa County Library District aspires to be the vibrant community front porch, a destination where people exchange ideas, gain access, foster creativity and pursue knowledge. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2016, 90% of survey respondents will report that the library’s collection of books and other materials meets their needs. Status: FY 2013 and 2014 results are in the mid-80%. The annual survey is done in the Spring but there is no FY 2015 data at this time. The Library District has added a Customer Experience Administrator and is reworking the current management structure of the libraries to be more responsive to the customer needs. The Library District is currently using focus groups and secret shoppers to identify ways in which to better engage customers. Regional Services By June 30, 2016 there will be a 30% usage increase of electronic materials. Status: FY 2014 Digital Circulation was up 34% from the previous year and is projected to increase in FY 2015. Government Operations By June 30, 2015, there will be a 10% increase in municipal partnerships. Status: All municipal libraries are using the Polaris system, partnering in the Summer Reading Program, and are active in the Library Assistance Program. This goal was met by June 30, 2015 and will be removed from the strategic business plan. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,806,840 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 19,019,752 $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 421,585 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,064,386 FINES & FORFEITS 689,740 INTEREST EARNINGS 18,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 134,150 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 25,347,613 $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ - $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 25,347,613 SUBTOTAL 8,925,007 $ 13,731,847 ELIMINATIONS $ - $ 13,731,847 - $ - $ 19,019,752 $ 421,585 5,064,386 689,740 18,000 134,150 25,347,613 $ - $ $ 19,019,752 421,585 5,064,386 689,740 18,000 134,150 25,347,613 664,734 664,734 $ 664,734 664,734 $ (664,734) (664,734) $ - (664,734) $ 25,347,613 $ 664,734 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 12,052,136 $ SUPPLIES 9,056,443 SERVICES 4,151,140 CAPITAL 30,000 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 25,289,719 $ - $ - $ 12,052,136 $ 9,056,443 4,151,140 30,000 25,289,719 $ - $ 4,200,000 664,734 4,864,734 $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 4,200,000 664,734 4,864,734 $ TOTAL USES $ 30,154,453 TOTAL 26,012,347 $ $ - $ 30,154,453 $ - $ $ 12,052,136 9,056,443 4,151,140 30,000 25,289,719 (664,734) (664,734) $ 4,200,000 4,200,000 (664,734) $ 29,489,719 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 57,894 $ - $ 57,894 $ - $ 57,894 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - $ 9,589,741 $ 9,589,741 $ - $ 9,589,741 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 21,091,271 $ 21,091,271 $ 21,092,815 6,731 $ 21,099,546 $ 20,710,145 4,448,803 $ 25,158,948 $ 222,275 $ $ 4,579,574 4,300 4,583,874 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ $ 25,226,495 65 (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. - 382,670 (4,442,072) $ (4,059,402) 222,275 $ 4,579,574 $ 415,931 4,995,505 $ (411,631) (411,631) (444,350) $ (444,350) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ (444,350) 664,734 220,384 $ 25,461,345 $ 29,489,719 $ (4,028,374) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $29,489,719 Fund Balance $4,142,106 14% Intergovernmental & Grants $5,064,386 17% Property Taxes $19,441,337 66% Miscellaneous & Interest $152,150 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $689,740 2% Uses of Funds $29,489,719 Information Technology $2,756,583 9% Administrative Services $7,156,704 24% Public Library Service $19,576,432 67% 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2014 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 302,665 302,665 5.4% 5.4% MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 5,849,858 $ 5,849,858 $ 5,350,761 $ 5,350,761 $ 5,585,611 $ 5,585,611 $ 5,871,428 $ 5,871,428 $ 5,888,276 $ 5,888,276 $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ (16,137) $ (16,137) $ - $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ 30,799 30,799 $ - $ 18,000 18,000 $ (32,000) (32,000) N/A -64.0% -64.0% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 14,432,730 $ 14,432,730 $ 19,639,641 $ 19,639,641 $ 19,639,641 $ 19,639,641 $ 19,654,741 $ 19,654,741 $ 19,441,337 $ 19,441,337 $ (198,304) (198,304) -1.0% -1.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 20,266,451 $ 25,040,402 $ 25,275,252 $ 25,556,968 $ 25,347,613 $ 72,361 0.3% 16,425,031 $ 4,236,057 20,661,088 $ 15,228,686 $ 5,102,835 20,331,521 $ 15,239,705 $ 5,456,611 20,696,316 $ 15,067,103 $ 5,307,662 20,374,765 $ 14,962,787 $ 4,718,043 19,680,830 $ 276,918 738,568 1,015,486 1.8% 13.5% 4.9% 501,754 $ 246,671 626,265 1,374,690 $ - $ 1,256,902 1,256,902 $ - $ 1,224,912 1,224,912 $ - $ 1,137,622 1,137,622 $ - $ 177,207 1,198,691 1,375,898 $ (177,207) 26,221 (150,986) N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.1% -12.3% 1,085,301 $ 89,400 1,174,701 $ 1,149,371 $ 171,537 98,394 1,419,302 $ 1,149,371 $ 175,799 98,394 1,423,564 $ 1,149,371 $ 178,501 155,787 1,483,659 $ 1,181,576 $ 4,200,000 172,525 107,643 5,661,744 $ (32,205) (4,200,000) 3,274 (9,249) (4,238,180) -2.8% N/A N/A 1.9% -9.4% -297.7% $ 303,988 $ 124,983 528,277 167,560 1,124,808 $ - $ 2,218,770 2,218,770 $ - $ 2,116,553 2,116,553 $ - $ 1,959,334 1,959,334 $ - $ 2,771,247 2,771,247 $ (654,694) (654,694) N/A N/A -30.9% N/A -30.9% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,335,287 $ 25,226,495 $ 25,461,345 $ 24,955,380 $ 29,489,719 $ (4,028,374) -15.8% USES MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH MUNI - SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT POOL - POOLED COSTS SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES MPOS - ELECTED OR STATUTORY OFFICIALS RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ Sources and Uses by Category FY 2014 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ $ 19,255,955 $ 19,255,955 $ $ $ 19,019,752 $ 19,019,752 $ (236,203) (236,203) -1.2% -1.2% 217,275 $ 377,686 594,961 $ - $ 421,585 421,585 $ (214,521) 43,899 (170,622) -100.0% 11.6% -28.8% $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 729,767 $ 729,767 $ 711,395 711,395 $ $ 711,395 $ 711,395 $ 717,727 $ 717,727 $ 689,740 689,740 $ 4,923 $ 438,167 443,090 $ 56,000 197,193 253,193 $ 56,000 $ 217,522 273,522 $ 51,899 $ 521,320 573,219 $ 4,442,173 4,442,173 $ $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ $ 4,442,173 4,442,173 $ 214,521 $ 377,686 592,207 $ 19,255,955 19,255,955 FY 2016 ADOPTED $ $ 4,411,924 4,411,924 $ 19,255,955 19,255,955 FY 2015 FORECAST $ SUBTOTAL $ 313,425 $ 295,028 608,453 $ FY 2015 REVISED 377,686 377,686 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS 14,073,217 14,073,217 FY 2015 ADOPTED 4,415,106 4,415,106 $ $ 5,064,386 $ 5,064,386 $ 622,213 622,213 14.0% 14.0% $ $ (21,655) (21,655) -3.0% -3.0% 18,000 $ 134,150 152,150 $ (38,000) (83,372) (121,372) -67.9% -38.3% -44.4% ALL REVENUES $ 20,266,451 $ 25,040,402 $ 25,275,252 $ 25,556,968 $ 25,347,613 $ 72,361 0.3% TOTAL SOURCES $ 20,266,451 $ 25,040,402 $ 25,275,252 $ 25,556,968 $ 25,347,613 $ 72,361 0.3% 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2016 ADOPTED 7,050,803 $ 1,067,692 4,678 2,874,827 320 (12,803) 97,865 11,083,382 $ 7,207,067 $ 1,327,764 3,025,221 240,087 (13,500) 90,267 11,876,906 $ 7,255,614 $ 1,182,406 2,970,381 29,070 (13,500) 90,267 11,514,238 $ 7,187,070 $ 1,095,668 622 2,954,822 23,315 (19,825) 140,406 11,382,078 $ 7,522,176 $ 1,183,846 6,500 3,255,467 400 (356,388) 440,135 12,052,136 $ (266,562) (1,440) (6,500) (285,086) 28,670 342,888 (349,868) (537,898) -3.7% -0.1% N/A -9.6% 98.6% 2539.9% -387.6% -4.7% 8,526,256 $ 10,158 457,933 125 8,994,472 $ 8,954,118 $ 21,000 210,000 582 9,185,700 $ 9,228,165 $ 21,000 217,500 582 9,467,247 $ 8,845,952 $ 13,768 360,270 809 9,220,799 $ 8,731,759 $ 10,000 314,000 (2,106) 2,790 9,056,443 $ 496,406 11,000 (96,500) 2,106 (2,208) 410,804 5.4% 52.4% -44.4% N/A -379.4% 4.3% 826,653 $ 642,056 610,906 1,171,049 33,851 53,188 225,964 522,455 14,429 4,100,551 $ 821,540 $ 611,622 699,246 1,199,905 57,010 74,800 249,398 34,010 415,930 428 4,163,889 $ 1,248,271 $ 473,622 699,246 1,199,905 83,510 94,800 249,398 430,680 428 4,479,860 $ 1,240,317 $ 522,736 527,589 1,212,407 3,126 79,963 112,490 236,069 417,378 428 4,352,503 $ 833,945 $ 442,720 713,935 5,422,462 45,648 75,848 245,980 568,145 (12,312) 14,769 8,351,140 $ 414,326 30,902 (14,689) (4,222,557) 37,862 18,952 3,418 (137,465) 12,312 (14,341) (3,871,280) 33.2% 6.5% -2.1% -351.9% N/A 45.3% 20.0% 1.4% N/A -31.9% N/A -3350.7% -86.4% $ 132,001 $ 24,881 156,882 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 30,000 $ (30,000) (30,000) N/A N/A N/A ALL EXPENDITURES $ 24,335,287 $ 25,226,495 $ 25,461,345 $ 24,955,380 $ 29,489,719 $ (4,028,374) -15.8% TOTAL USES $ 24,335,287 $ 25,226,495 $ 25,461,345 $ 24,955,380 $ 29,489,719 $ (4,028,374) -15.8% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0845 - SUPPORT AND CARE OF PERSONS 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP SUBTOTAL $ $ $ Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2014 ACTUAL $ FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 43,425 $ 270,000 313,425 $ - $ - $ - $ 222,275 222,275 $ - $ 222,275 222,275 $ - $ - $ (222,275) (222,275) N/A -100.0% -100.0% 15,848,605 $ 3,737,685 19,586,290 $ 20,899,178 $ 20,899,178 $ 20,900,722 $ 6,731 20,907,453 $ 21,167,338 $ 6,731 21,174,069 $ 20,768,039 $ 20,768,039 $ (132,683) (6,731) (139,414) -0.6% -100.0% -0.7% 4,713,131 $ 4,713,131 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,300 4,583,874 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,300 4,583,874 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ (4,300) (4,300) 0.0% -100.0% -0.1% 21,060 $ 21,060 $ - $ 6,000 6,000 $ - $ 6,000 6,000 $ - $ 21,100 21,100 $ - $ 664,734 664,734 $ 658,734 658,734 SOURCES $ (862,645) $ (3,504,810) (4,367,455) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ 444,350 (664,734) (220,384) -100.0% N/A 49.6% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 19,763,576 $ 502,875 $ 20,266,451 $ 25,034,402 $ 6,000 $ 25,040,402 $ 25,035,946 $ 239,306 $ 25,275,252 $ 25,302,562 $ 254,406 $ 25,556,968 $ 25,347,613 $ - $ 25,347,613 $ 311,667 (239,306) 72,361 1.2% -100.0% 0.3% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ 68 N/A 10978.9% 10978.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2016 ADOPTED $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 313,426 $ 313,426 $ - $ - $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ - $ - $ $ 17,379,561 $ 2,945,209 20,324,770 $ 21,091,271 $ 21,091,271 $ 21,092,815 $ 6,731 21,099,546 $ 21,002,781 $ 6,731 21,009,512 $ 20,710,145 $ 4,448,803 25,158,948 $ 382,670 (4,442,072) (4,059,402) 1.8% -65994.2% -19.2% FUND TOTAL USES $ 4,559,736 $ 343,555 4,903,291 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,300 4,583,874 $ 4,163,643 $ 4,300 4,167,943 $ 4,579,574 $ 415,931 4,995,505 $ (411,631) (411,631) 0.0% -9572.8% -9.0% $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ FUND TOTAL USES $ (862,645) $ (3,504,810) (4,367,455) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ - $ (664,734) (664,734) $ (444,350) 664,734 220,384 100.0% N/A -49.6% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 21,076,652 $ 3,258,635 $ 24,335,287 $ 25,226,495 $ - $ 25,226,495 $ 25,228,039 $ 233,306 $ 25,461,345 $ 24,722,074 $ 233,306 $ 24,955,380 $ 25,289,719 $ 4,200,000 $ 29,489,719 $ (61,680) (3,966,694) (4,028,374) -0.2% -1700.2% -15.8% 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 222,275 222,275 100.0% 100.0% - N/A N/A Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - Operating $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 664,734 OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 ELIMINATIONS $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ Operating $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 69 (664,734) (664,734) - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 664,734 Operating $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 248,803 Operating $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 248,803 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 415,931 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 415,931 $ - $ - $ - $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 664,734 CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ 444,350 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 664,734 ELIMINATIONS $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ Operating $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 70 (664,734) (664,734) - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTED OR STATUTORY OFFICIALS PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 6.00 4.00 3.00 13.00 12.00 12.00 .00 .00 .00 11.45 11.45 11.45 11.45 11.45 11.45 - N/A N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 .00 .00 .00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 - N/A N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0% 137.73 137.73 164.73 137.73 137.73 164.73 134.61 2.67 137.28 162.73 135.61 2.67 138.28 163.73 135.61 2.67 138.28 163.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.6% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Department Facilities Planner Deputy Director - Library Director - Library Executive Assistant Finance Manager Finance Support Supervisor Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Manager Human Resources Specialist IT Division Manager IT Services Supv Librarian Library Administrator Library Clerk Library Large Branch Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Region Manager Library Small Branch Manager Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized PC/LAN Technician Systems Administrator Trades Generalist Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer - Senior/Lead Department Total FY 2014 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.00 3.00 48.49 11.00 1.24 18.00 4.00 11.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 164.73 FY 2015 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.00 3.00 47.49 12.00 1.24 18.00 4.00 10.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 164.73 71 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.00 30.00 3.00 3.00 48.49 48.49 11.00 11.00 1.24 1.24 18.00 19.00 7.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 162.73 163.73 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 30.00 0.0% 3.00 0.0% 48.49 0.0% 11.00 0.0% 1.24 0.0% 20.00 2.00 11.1% 7.00 0.0% 9.00 0.0% 5.00 (1.00) (16.7%) 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% N/A N/A 6.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 2.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 163.73 1.00 0.6% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Department Total FY 2014 ADOPTED 117.73 47.00 164.73 FY 2015 ADOPTED 116.73 48.00 164.73 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 116.73 117.73 46.00 46.00 162.73 163.73 FY 2016 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 116.73 0.0% 47.00 1.00 2.2% 163.73 1.00 0.6% General Adjustments Personnel: FY 2016 personnel expenditures increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments made in FY 2015. Base Adjustments: Library District Fund (244) • Decrease Regular Benefits by $5,727 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $9,249 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. • Increase transfer to Capital Improvement Fund by $248,803. Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) • Decrease Regular Benefits by $1,868 for the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase transfer to Capital Improvement Fund by $415,931. Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent. Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs. Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered. Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program. Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program. FY 2014 ACTUAL 51.0% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 48.6% 48.6% FY 2016 ADOPTED 48.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 82.9% 87.7% 87.7% 87.7% 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 91.8% 91.8% 91.8% 0.0% 0.0% 26.8% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 0.0% 0.0% 92.1% 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. 72 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Mandates: Discretionary services. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Number of items circulated Number of programs and activities provided Number of digital materials accessed Number of website visits Number of items requested to be circulated Number of digital materials requested to be accessed Total expenditure per item circulated FY 2014 ACTUAL 51.0% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 48.6% 48.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 48.6% 82.9% 87.7% 87.7% 87.7% 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 91.8% 91.8% 91.8% 0.0% 0.0% 7,545,168 5,101 710,623 3,602,382 8,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 5,500 1,000,000 3,715,000 8,000,000 1,000,000 7,781,517 5,158 1,000,000 3,569,874 7,750,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 5,500 1,000,000 3,715,000 8,000,000 1,000,000 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $ 2.18 $ 1.90 $ 1.94 $ 1.87 $ 0.03 1.8% Total expenditure per digital material accessed $ 23.11 $ 15.24 $ 15.07 $ 14.96 $ 0.28 1.8% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 270,000 $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ - $ 1,729,372 1,223,812 1,509,629 1,308,702 4,713,131 4,583,874 4,583,874 4,579,574 664,734 (862,645) (444,350) (444,350) (664,734) $ 5,849,858 $ 5,585,611 $ 5,871,428 $ 5,888,276 $ (222,275) 84,890 (4,300) 664,734 (220,384) 302,665 -100.0% 6.9% -0.1% N/A 49.6% 5.4% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 222,275 245,890 (411,631) 220,384 276,918 100.0% 2.3% -9.0% -49.6% 1.8% Expenditure 313,426 $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ - $ 12,414,514 10,877,906 11,121,235 10,632,016 4,559,736 4,583,874 4,167,943 4,995,505 (862,645) (444,350) (444,350) (664,734) $ 16,425,031 $ 15,239,705 $ 15,067,103 $ 14,962,787 $ Activity Narrative: The Library District Grant Fund (242) revenues decreased due to the expiration of large grants during FY 2015. Subsequently, expenditures had a corresponding decrease. Library District Fund (244) has an increase in revenues primarily because this is the first fiscal year that the District will be receiving the 10% overhead for personnel, supplies and services for Northwest Regional Library from the City of Surprise. There was a slight reduction in the budget requests for the Gilbert and the Surprise libraries costing and, consequently, the revenue and expenditures which covers at 100% is down by the same amount. The Library District Fund (244) expenditures include an increased transfer of funds to the Capital Improvement Fund (465). Support for Municipalities Services Activity The Municipalities Services Activity purpose is to provide a better library service to Maricopa County Residents through implementation of our Polaris Program, consulting services and partnerships with cities and towns. Mandates: Discretionary services. 73 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program Number of Summer Reading Program participants Number of materials provided through Materials Assistance Program Number of materials requested to be provided through Materials Assistance Program Number of people requesting Summer Reading Program participation Total expenditure per Summer Reading Program participant 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL USES Library District FY 2014 ACTUAL 26.8% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 55.0% 55.0% 92.1% $ 90.0% FY 2016 ADOPTED 55.0% 90.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 0.0% 64,987 95,000 95,000 95,000 - 0.0% 202,011 104,000 104,000 104,000 - 0.0% 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 - 0.0% 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 - 0.0% 65.18 $ 4,236,057 $ 4,236,057 $ 57.44 $ 5,456,611 $ 5,456,611 $ 55.87 $ 5,307,662 $ 5,307,662 49.66 $ 7.77 13.5% $ 4,718,043 $ 4,718,043 $ $ 738,568 738,568 13.5% 13.5% $ Activity Narrative: Both Scottsdale and Chandler were brought onto Polaris in FY 2015. The decrease in expenditures is the savings between the ongoing maintenance/hosting and bringing two large systems online. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Beginning in FY 2016 for Tax Year 2015, the Library District secondary property tax will no longer assess property valuation based on full cash value, but instead on limited property value and will have a growth cap of 5% on property taxed in the prior year. This change in property tax collections is due to a voter approved Proposition 117 that was approved in 2012. Previously, secondary net assessed values of real and personal property had no constitutional limitation on growth. The Library District Board of Directors chose to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy resulting in a 2% cap annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2016. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2015 to FY 2016. The Library District’s property tax rate for FY 2016 will remain flat at $0.0556 per $100 net assessed value. Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 33,197,218 36,294,693 49,534,573 58,303,635 57,984,051 49,707,952 38,760,297 34,400,455 32,229,007 37,616,986 34,623,670 74 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.0521 0.0507 0.0391 0.0353 0.0353 0.0412 0.0492 0.0492 0.0438 0.0556 0.0556 Tax Levy 17,295,751 18,401,410 19,368,018 20,581,183 20,468,370 20,479,676 19,070,066 16,925,024 14,116,305 19,504,284 19,250,761 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Fiscal Year The FY 2016 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $19,250,761, a decrease of $253,523 from the FY 2015 Adopted Levy. Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY: FY 2016 Adopted FY 2015 Adopted FY 2016 Variance $ $ $ 34,623,670,323 $ 35,079,646,593 $ (455,976,270) $ FY 2016 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES LIBRARY DISTRICT Salt River Proj. Effective Net Total Net Assessed Revenue from Assessed Value Value w/SRP 1-cent Levy Tax Rates 758,245,769 679,290,980 78,954,789 $ $ $ 35,381,916,092 $ 35,758,937,573 $ (377,021,481) $ 3,538,192 $ 3,575,894 $ (37,702) $ 0.0556 0.0556 - SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) $ $ $ 19,250,761 $ 19,504,284 $ (253,523) $ 421,585 377,686 43,899 Total Tax Levy & PILT $ $ $ Levy Limit FY 2016 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY VS. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2016 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 27,006,463 0.0780 FY 2016 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP): Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 19,250,761 0.0556 Amount Under Limit: $ 7,755,702 0.0224 75 28.7% 19,672,346 19,881,970 (209,624) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District FY 2016 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2016 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 19,839,363 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0573 FY 2016 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 19,250,761 0.0556 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 588,602 0.0017 FY 2016 Median Residential Limited Property Value $ 116,078 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home $ 6.65 Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home 6.45 Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 0.20 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2015: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2016: Median Residential Limited Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ $ 3.0% 3.0% 119,600 0.0556 6.65 $ 116,078 0.0556 6.45 $ 0.20 3.0% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2016 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2016. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2016 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 19,250,761 $ 19,019,752 76 Rate 98.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2007 246,032 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011 269,405 2012 327,394 2013 329,011 2014 296,957 2015* 377,686 2016** 421,585 * Forecast ** Budget Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2015 FY 2016 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library $ 938,895 $ 1,025,985 Surprise/Hollyhock 1,374,620 1,852,860 Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) 26,855 26,855 Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library 2,100,803 2,158,686 TOTAL $ 4,441,173 $ 5,064,386 Fines and Forfeits Fines and Forfeits $740,000 The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2014, the anticipated amount for FY 2015 and the budget for FY 2016. $730,000 $720,000 $710,000 $700,000 $690,000 $680,000 $670,000 Miscellaneous Revenue $660,000 FY 2014 Actual The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2014 through the FY 2016 budget. The FY 2016 Miscellaneous Revenues are significantly less than those budgeted for FY 2015 because of the donations received for remodels at Sun City and Fairway. 77 FY 2015 Forecast FY 2016 Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. Fund Balance Summary Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2015 ADOPTED $ - $ $ $ Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 43,425 270,000 313,425 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance FY 2015 REVISED (8,683) $ $ - 313,426 313,426 $ $ 43,425 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ FY 2015 FORECAST (8,683) $ - $ - $ $ - $ 222,275 222,275 $ 222,275 222,275 - $ 222,275 222,275 $ 222,275 222,275 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ (8,683) (8,683) $ - $ - (8,683) (8,683) $ $ FY 2016 ADOPTED Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2015 REVISED FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 4,828,038 $ 3,715,047 $ 3,715,047 $ 4,226,352 $ 4,390,909 $ 15,848,605 3,737,685 19,586,290 $ 20,899,178 20,899,178 $ 20,900,722 6,731 20,907,453 $ 21,167,338 6,731 21,174,069 $ 20,768,039 20,768,039 $ 21,091,271 21,091,271 $ 21,092,815 6,731 21,099,546 $ $ 21,002,781 6,731 21,009,512 $ $ 17,379,561 2,945,209 20,324,770 $ 20,710,145 4,448,803 25,158,948 Structural Balance $ (1,530,956) $ (192,093) $ 164,557 $ 57,894 Accounting Adjustments $ 136,794 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 4,226,352 4,226,352 $ $ 3,522,954 3,522,954 $ $ 3,522,954 3,522,954 $ $ 4,390,909 4,390,909 $ $ - Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ $ $ $ (192,093) $ 78 $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2016 ADOPTED FY 2015 FORECAST $ 326,951 $ 510,625 $ 510,625 $ - $ 415,931 $ 4,713,131 4,713,131 $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 4,300 4,583,874 $ 4,579,574 4,300 4,583,874 $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,163,643 4,300 4,167,943 $ $ 4,579,574 4,300 4,583,874 $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ $ 4,559,736 343,555 4,903,291 $ 4,579,574 415,931 4,995,505 Structural Balance $ 153,395 $ - $ - $ 415,931 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (136,791) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ 510,625 510,625 $ $ 510,625 510,625 $ $ 415,931 415,931 $ $ - Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ - $ $ $ $ Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 12,044,103 $ 8,901,299 $ 8,901,299 $ 8,903,907 $ 8,925,007 $ $ $ $ 21,100 21,100 $ $ 6,000 6,000 $ $ 6,000 6,000 $ 664,734 664,734 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 21,060 21,060 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ - $ - $ - $ - Structural Balance $ 21,060 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 8,907,299 8,907,299 $ $ 8,907,299 8,907,299 $ $ 8,925,007 8,925,007 $ $ 9,589,741 9,589,741 8,903,907 8,903,907 $ $ 79 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Thelma B. Cornfield Donation Grants Library District Tribal Gaming Grant Tribal Gaming Grant Reconciliation AZ State Library Technology Act Grant AZ State Library Grant Stem Grant for Guadalupe Branch Library - $ - $ 7,754 $ 2,754 5,000 214,521 $ 25,000 63,021 100,000 25,000 1,500 7,754 2,754 5,000 214,521 25,000 63,021 100,000 25,000 1,500 $ 222,275 $ 222,275 $ (7,754) $ (2,754) (5,000) (214,521) $ (25,000) (63,021) (100,000) (25,000) (1,500) (7,754) (2,754) (5,000) (214,521) (25,000) (63,021) (100,000) (25,000) (1,500) Agenda Item: C-65-11-002-D-01 C-65-05-009-M-00 $ C-65-15-001-M-00 C-65-15-006-M-00 C-65-15-007-M-00 C-65-15-008-M-00 C-65-15-014-M-00 FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Thelma B. Cornfield Donation Grants Library District Tribal Gaming Grant Tribal Gaming Grant Reconciliation AZ State Library Technology Act Grant AZ State Library Grant Stem Grant for Guadalupe Branch Library $ Agenda Item: C-65-11-002-D-01 C-65-05-009-M-00 $ C-65-15-001-M-00 C-65-15-006-M-00 C-65-15-007-M-00 C-65-15-008-M-00 C-65-15-014-M-00 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ - $ - FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ - $ - 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants Library District Friends of Queen Creek Donation 20,899,178 $ 1,544 $ 1,544 1,544 1,544 $ 21,092,815 $ 20,900,722 $ (1,544) $ (1,544) $ 21,091,271 $ $ (5,727) $ (5,727) (375,399) $ (384,648) 9,249 - $ - (131,139) 57,894 (189,033) $ 20,710,145 $ -1.8% 20,768,039 -0.6% $ - $ - $ 6,731 $ 3,200 1,933 1,598 6,731 3,200 1,933 1,598 $ 6,731 $ 6,731 $ (6,731) $ (3,200) (1,933) (1,598) (6,731) (3,200) (1,933) (1,598) $ - $ - $ 248,803 248,803 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 - 4,448,803 $ - C-65-15-004-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-15-004-M-00 FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes 21,091,271 $ Agenda Item: FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants Library District Friends of Queen Creek Donation $ (1,544) (1,544) 20,899,178 Agenda Item: $ $ 9,249 $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the Surprise Library Friends of the El Mirage Library Friends of Library Donation - Summer Reading Program Agenda Item: C-65-15-011-M-00 C-65-15-012-M-00 C-65-15-013-M-00 FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the Surprise Library Friends of the El Mirage Library Friends of Library Donation - Summer Reading Program Agenda Item: C-65-15-011-M-00 C-65-15-012-M-00 C-65-15-013-M-00 FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Other Mandates State Contribution Agenda Item: $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 81 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ (1,868) $ (1,868) 1,868 $ 1,868 - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Agenda Item: $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget $ 4,579,574 $ Expenditures 4,579,574 Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the Surprise Libraries Donation Friends of the Surprise Libraries Donation - $ 4,300 $ 2,985 1,315 4,300 2,985 1,315 $ 4,300 $ 4,300 $ (4,300) $ (2,985) (1,315) (4,300) (2,985) (1,315) $ - $ - $ 415,931 $ 415,931 - $ 415,931 $ - C-65-15-017-M-00 C-65-15-018-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-15-017-M-00 C-65-15-018-M-00 FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer - $ Agenda Item: FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the Surprise Libraries Donation Friends of the Surprise Libraries Donation $ Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ 6,000 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ - $ 6,000 $ - $ - (6,000) (6,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - 664,734 664,734 $ - $ 664,734 Adjustments: General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ - $ - FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ - $ - $ (664,734) $ (664,734) - (664,734) (664,734) $ (664,734) $ (664,734) Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Non Recurring Fund Transfer R Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Library District 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Adopt the Stadium District Fiscal Year 2016 Budget in the amount of $10,712,934 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Stadium District. This amount represents no change from the Fiscal Year 2016 Tentative Budget of $10,712,934. 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District 86 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Steve Chucri, Chairman, District 2 Denny Barney, District 1 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Steve Gallardo, District 5 The Stadium District’s recommended expenditure budget for FY 2016 is $10,712,934 and the recommended revenue budget is $10,539,553. Chase Field is now entering its 18th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility, the District completed Phase IV of the Concrete and Structural Repair project in FY 2015. The Concrete and Structural project is projected to be an ongoing, multi-year effort based on objective findings from the Facility Assessment Study (conducted every two years) and annual observation and investigation. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue $5,400,000 $5,200,000 $5,000,000 $4,800,000 $4,600,000 $4,400,000 FY12 Actual FY13 Actual FY14 Actual FY15 Forecast FY16 Adopted On August 1, 2012, the District issued Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 in the amount of $25,140,000 (par value) with an interest rate of 2.28%. The District effectively bought down the debt, which allowed for a lower interest rate and lower annual debt service payments. In FY 2014, the outstanding balance of the Bonds, was $19,260,000. The District will pay $3,250,000 in principal in FY 2015, leaving a balance of $16,010,000. In FY 2014, $1,539,921 of excess car rental surcharge revenue was remitted to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA). As a result of the reduction in principal and interest payments, it is expected that excess car rental surcharge revenue will continue to be available for remittance to AZSTA in FY 2015 and 2016. In FY 2014, loans payable of $5,706,857 were paid in full to the Arizona Diamondbacks. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District On June 22, 2015, the Maricopa County Stadium District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2016 Stadium District Budget totaling $10,712,934. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. Evening baseball game at Chase Field 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Carmine L. Davis, Management & Budget Supervisor Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 2017, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 5% from 80% to 85% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: The routine maintenance items completed on schedule during FY 2014 ending in the fiscal year at 81%. It is anticipated that the routine maintenance items to be completed for FY 2015 will be at approximately 83%. Department Specific By June 2017, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 3% from 168 to 173 non-baseball events. Status: There were 182 non-baseball events held at the ballpark during FY 2014. This represented a 61% increase over the baseline amount of 113 non-baseball events. It is anticipated that the number of non-baseball events for FY 2015 will be 182 or greater. Department Specific By June, 2017, the District will increase facility revenue from $600,000 to $630,000 by 5% for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: Revenue for District Events were $600,000 for FY 2014. District Events revenue is scheduled to increase to $650,000 on April 1, 2015 in accordance with the contract. 89 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE DEBT SERVICE $ 13,304,791 $ 4,401,344 GENERAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ TOTAL SOURCES $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 1,319,391 $ 3,701,278 $ 3,499,163 1,235,176 34,000 345 6,087,730 $ 3,701,623 $ - $ 6,087,730 INTERNAL SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS - $ $ 3,701,623 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ - $ - $ 418,697 $ - $ 5,543 2,583,906 11,595 165 3,690,028 1,385,778 4,394,089 $ 3,701,623 $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES $ OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 $ TOTAL USES $ - $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ - $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - $ 12,498,432 6,868,120 $ SUBTOTAL - $ $ - TOTAL $ 24,574,255 100 $ 100 750,000 1,385,778 2,135,978 $ - $ - $ 5,020,769 $ 3,499,163 1,235,176 34,445 750,000 1,385,778 11,925,331 $ - $ (1,385,778) (1,385,778) $ 5,020,769 3,499,163 1,235,176 34,445 750,000 10,539,553 2,500,000 2,500,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 $ (2,500,000) (2,500,000) $ - 4,635,978 - $ (3,885,778) $ 10,539,553 $ $ 14,425,331 - $ 3,000 3,000 $ - $ - $ 418,697 $ 5,543 2,598,501 3,690,193 1,385,778 8,098,712 $ - $ (1,385,778) (1,385,778) $ 418,697 5,543 2,598,501 3,690,193 6,712,934 - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ 2,500,000 6,500,000 $ - $ (2,500,000) (2,500,000) $ 4,000,000 4,000,000 (3,885,778) $ 10,712,934 - $ $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 6,894,089 $ 3,701,623 $ 4,003,000 $ - $ 1,693,641 $ - $ 2,132,978 $ - $ $ 4,401,344 $ 7,501,098 $ - $ 90 24,574,255 ELIMINATIONS 14,598,712 $ 3,826,619 $ 24,400,874 $ - $ 3,826,619 - $ 24,400,874 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2015 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING All Functions LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT FY 2015 REVISED FY 2016 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,297,259 $ (22,503) $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 2,500,000 (2,500,000) $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 5,596,830 $ (2,500,000) $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ $ 3,000 $ 3,000 2,000,000 2,400,000 $ 2,003,000 $ 2,403,000 $ $ 1,174,368 1,174,368 3,000 $ 4,000,000 (1,600,000) $ 4,003,000 $ (1,600,000) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,385,778) $ (1,175,613) (2,500,000) 2,500,000 $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (3,885,778) $ 1,324,387 $ 8,689,186 $ 9,089,186 91 $10,712,934 $ (1,623,748) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $10,539,553 Miscellaneous $750,000 7.1% Interest $34,445 0.3% Charges for Services $1,235,176 11.7% Sales Taxes $5,020,769 47.6% Licenses and Permits $3,499,163 33.2% Uses of Funds $10,712,934 Administrative Services $354,566 3.3% Stadium Operations $5,366,734 50.1% Cactus League Support $4,991,634 46.6% 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2014 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES $ FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ 5,395,215 $ 5,383,795 10,779,010 $ 4,997,238 $ 5,426,745 10,423,983 $ 4,997,238 $ 5,426,745 10,423,983 $ 4,997,274 $ 5,397,529 10,394,803 $ 5,021,014 $ 5,484,439 10,505,453 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 56,183 $ 56,183 $ 34,128 $ 34,128 $ 34,128 $ 34,128 $ 40,166 $ 40,166 $ 34,100 $ 34,100 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,835,193 $ 10,458,111 $ 10,458,111 $ 10,434,969 $ 10,539,553 $ $ 5,253,971 $ 10,283,854 15,537,825 $ 4,971,521 $ 3,426,793 8,398,314 $ 4,971,521 $ 3,821,375 8,792,896 $ 4,971,373 $ 3,765,886 8,737,259 $ 4,991,634 $ 5,369,386 10,361,020 $ (20,113) (1,548,011) (1,568,124) -0.4% -40.5% -17.8% 64,897 $ 53,161 134,377 252,435 $ 63,040 $ 53,770 78,336 6,240 44,390 245,776 $ 64,432 $ 54,704 80,284 6,371 45,364 251,155 $ 54,303 $ 47,628 74,992 5,464 58,741 241,128 $ 56,914 $ 55,286 80,826 10,985 3,241 59,648 266,900 $ 7,518 (582) (542) (10,985) 3,130 (14,284) (15,745) 11.7% -1.1% -0.7% N/A 49.1% -31.5% -6.3% 36,293 $ 1,977 996 39,266 $ 36,293 $ 1,977 996 39,266 $ 36,294 $ 833 997 38,124 $ 79,504 $ 897 80,401 $ (43,211) 1,977 99 (41,135) -119.1% 100.0% N/A 9.9% -104.8% 1,256 1,256 23,776 57,694 81,470 (28) (28) 81,442 0.5% 1.1% 0.8% -0.1% -0.1% 0.8% USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT POOL - POOLED COSTS PROC - PROCUREMENT SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ 49,326 $ 1,028 50,354 $ TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ - $ - $ 5,830 $ 5,830 $ 5,869 $ 5,869 $ 3,590 $ 3,590 $ 4,613 $ 4,613 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 15,840,614 $ 8,689,186 $ 9,089,186 $ 9,020,101 $ 10,712,934 $ $ 93 (1,623,748) 21.4% 21.4% -17.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2014 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2016 ADOPTED SUBTOTAL $ 5,394,707 5,394,707 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 5,020,769 5,020,769 $ 23,727 23,727 0.5% 0.5% $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,391,204 3,391,204 $ $ 3,422,385 3,422,385 $ $ 3,422,385 3,422,385 $ $ 3,463,083 3,463,083 $ $ 3,499,163 3,499,163 $ $ 76,778 76,778 2.2% 2.2% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,122,640 1,122,640 $ $ 1,254,260 1,254,260 $ $ 1,254,260 1,254,260 $ $ 1,169,846 1,169,846 $ $ 1,235,176 1,235,176 $ $ (19,084) (19,084) -1.5% -1.5% 56,821 869,821 926,642 $ 34,424 750,000 784,424 $ 34,424 750,000 784,424 $ 40,449 764,549 804,998 $ $ $ 34,445 750,000 784,445 10,434,969 $ 10,539,553 10,458,111 $ 10,434,969 $ 10,539,553 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ ALL REVENUES $ TOTAL SOURCES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ $ 10,835,193 $ $ 10,458,111 $ 10,835,193 $ 10,458,111 $ FY 2014 FY 2015 ACTUAL ADOPTED $ 10,458,111 $ $ 21 21 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% $ 81,442 0.8% 81,442 0.8% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 292,314 $ 6,185 93,339 (17,064) 13,728 388,502 $ 282,444 $ 9,773 5,000 92,251 9,642 (12,497) 16,146 402,759 $ 290,088 $ 9,773 5,000 93,507 (12,797) 16,485 402,056 $ 295,960 $ 4,007 5,047 93,615 (39,243) 15,337 374,723 $ 298,742 $ 9,772 5,000 101,526 (13,489) 17,146 418,697 $ (8,654) 1 (8,019) 692 (661) (16,641) -3.0% 0.0% 0.0% -8.6% N/A 5.4% -4.0% -4.1% 604 $ 468 2,489 3,561 $ 2,100 $ 60 2,160 $ 2,100 $ 60 2,160 $ 1,275 $ 1,275 $ 5,485 $ 58 5,543 $ (3,385) 2 (3,383) -161.2% N/A 3.3% -156.6% 29,190 $ 2,043,074 3,498,026 471,829 (160) 4,939 1,398 60 35 1,479 6,049,870 $ 75,298 $ 1,956,355 3,000 2,001,000 542,864 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,952 4,594,970 $ 75,298 $ 1,957,058 3,000 2,001,000 542,864 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,952 4,595,673 $ 75,766 $ 1,956,062 2,913 2,400,500 508,539 4,825 4,599 151 409 1,031 4,954,795 $ 75,298 $ 1,948,059 3,000 4,001,000 555,910 4,950 8,400 276 875 733 6,598,501 $ 8,999 (2,000,000) (13,046) 1,219 (2,002,828) 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% -100.0% -2.4% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 62.4% -43.6% $ - $ 9,398,489 192 9,398,681 $ - $ 3,689,128 169 3,689,297 $ 400,000 $ 3,689,128 169 4,089,297 $ - $ 3,689,128 180 3,689,308 $ - $ 3,690,028 165 3,690,193 $ 400,000 (900) 4 399,104 100.0% 0.0% 2.4% 9.8% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 15,840,614 $ 8,689,186 $ 9,089,186 $ 9,020,101 $ 10,712,934 $ (1,623,748) -17.9% TOTAL USES $ 15,840,614 $ 8,689,186 $ 9,089,186 $ 9,020,101 $ 10,712,934 $ (1,623,748) -17.9% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 1,687,951 $ 1,687,951 $ 1,310,888 $ 1,310,888 $ 1,310,888 $ 1,310,888 $ 1,313,094 $ 1,313,094 $ 1,333,391 $ 1,333,391 $ 22,503 22,503 1.7% 1.7% $ SOURCES $ 4,618,271 $ 4,618,271 $ 4,696,645 $ 4,696,645 $ 4,696,645 $ 4,696,645 $ 4,656,789 $ 4,656,789 $ 4,754,339 $ 4,754,339 $ 57,694 57,694 1.2% 1.2% $ 5,395,215 $ 5,706,857 11,102,072 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,999 $ 4,875,999 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ (1,174,368) (1,174,368) -24.1% N/A -24.1% 1,786,689 $ 1,786,689 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,150,478 $ 2,150,478 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,500,000 4,635,978 $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 0.0% N/A 117.0% (2,652,933) $ (5,706,857) (8,359,790) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ 1,175,613 (2,500,000) (1,324,387) -45.9% N/A 51.7% 10,835,193 $ 10,835,193 $ FY 2014 ACTUAL 10,458,111 $ 10,458,111 $ FY 2015 ADOPTED $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,562,051 $ 1,562,051 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,637 $ 1,274,637 $ 1,297,259 $ 1,297,259 $ (22,503) (22,503) -1.8% -1.8% $ 2,370,035 $ 5,706,857 8,076,892 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,028,392 $ 3,028,392 $ 3,096,830 $ 2,500,000 5,596,830 $ (2,500,000) (2,500,000) 0.0% N/A -80.7% 5,354,078 $ 5,706,857 11,060,935 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,963 $ 4,875,963 $ 3,701,623 $ 3,701,623 $ 1,174,368 1,174,368 24.1% N/A 24.1% 2,500 $ 3,498,026 3,500,526 $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 2,003,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,400,000 2,403,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,400,000 2,402,500 $ 3,000 $ 4,000,000 4,003,000 $ (1,600,000) (1,600,000) 0.0% -66.7% -66.6% FUND TOTAL USES $ (2,652,933) $ (5,706,857) (8,359,790) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,385,778) $ (2,500,000) (3,885,778) $ (1,175,613) 2,500,000 1,324,387 45.9% N/A -51.7% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 6,635,731 $ 9,204,883 $ 15,840,614 $ 6,689,186 $ 2,000,000 $ 8,689,186 $ 6,689,186 $ 2,400,000 $ 9,089,186 $ 6,620,101 $ 2,400,000 $ 9,020,101 $ 6,712,934 $ 4,000,000 $ 10,712,934 $ (23,748) (1,600,000) (1,623,748) -0.4% -66.7% -17.9% 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 95 10,458,111 $ 10,434,969 $ 10,458,111 $ 10,434,969 $ FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 10,539,553 $ 81,442 0.8% 10,539,553 $ 81,442 0.8% FY 2016 REVISED VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Operating $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Operating $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - DEBT SERVICE $ - $ - $ - $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 3,885,778 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 3,885,778 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 3,885,778 Operating $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ Operating $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,385,778) Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ (2,500,000) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 96 (3,885,778) - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 3,885,778 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 3,885,778 Operating $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 DEBT SERVICE $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Operating $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - Operating $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 $ - $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 3,885,778 Operating $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 2,561,391 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ Operating $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,385,778) Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ (2,500,000) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS (3,885,778) - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .85 1.15 .60 2.60 .80 .50 .55 .70 .10 2.65 .80 .50 .55 .70 .10 2.65 .80 .50 .55 .70 .10 2.65 .70 .50 .55 .85 .05 2.65 (.10) .15 (.05) - (12.5%) 0.0% 0.0% 21.4% (50.0%) 0.0% 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Facil Capital Project Mgr Finance/Business Analyst Office Assistant Department Total FY 2014 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2015 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 FY 2016 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 1.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2015 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 FY 2016 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 5.00 0.0% 5.00 0.0% Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total General Adjustments FY 2016 personnel expenditures increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments in FY 2015. Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating • Decrease revenues by $19,084 for the impact of lower stadium fee rentals. • Decrease Regular Benefits by $333 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Decrease Internal Service Charges by $99 for the impact of the changes in risk management charges. • Increase Other Services by $432 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates and risk management charges. • Increase revenues by $76,778 for the impact of the additional payments from the Arizona Diamondbacks in compliance with multiple agreements. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Non Recurring Non Project • Increase Transfer Out by $2,500,000 to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non Recurring Non Project. Eliminations Fund (900) Operating • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $1,175,613 to eliminate transfers between Cactus League Operations Fund (250) and Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370). Eliminations Fund (900) Non Recurring Non Project • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $2,500,000 to eliminate transfers between Ballpark Operations Fund (253) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year FY 2014 ACTUAL 81.1% FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 82.7% 30.7% FY 2016 ADOPTED 81.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (1.6%) -1.9% 90.8% 90.8% 77.4% 77.4% (13.5%) -14.8% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent change in economic benefit from 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cactus League over prior year Number of existing spring training facilities in 10 10 10 10 0.0% Maricopa County for the current Fiscal Year Number of existing and planned spring training 10 10 10 10 0.0% facilities for the current Fiscal Year Cost per existing spring training facility in $ 525,397.10 $ 497,152.10 $ 497,137.30 $ 499,163.40 $ (2,011.30) -0.4% Maricopa County for the current fiscal year 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 1,661,196 $ 1,296,888 $ 1,296,888 $ 1,319,391 5,395,215 4,875,963 4,875,999 3,701,623 (1,661,196) (1,175,613) (1,175,613) $ 5,395,215 $ 4,997,238 $ 4,997,274 $ 5,021,014 $ 22,503 (1,174,340) 1,175,613 $ 23,776 1.7% -24.1% -100.0% 0.5% 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 1,561,089 $ 1,271,143 $ 1,271,023 $ 1,290,011 5,354,078 4,875,991 4,875,963 3,701,623 (1,661,196) (1,175,613) (1,175,613) $ 5,253,971 $ 4,971,521 $ 4,971,373 $ 4,991,634 $ -1.5% 24.1% 100.0% -0.4% Expenditure (18,868) 1,174,368 (1,175,613) $ (20,113) Activity Narrative: The annual cost per spring training facility declined in FY 2014 due to the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 in FY 2013. The reduction in debt service allowed for a payment of $1,175,613 to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement in FY 2014. Revenue collected for the Car Rental 99 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Surcharge is expected to decrease 9.2% from the FY 2015 Revised budget amount. This estimated decrease is based on historical results and conservative forecasting. Cactus League Fund (250) Operating • Increase revenue by $22,503 due to the reallocation of estimated excess Car Rental Surcharge from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) in FY 2016. • Increase expenditures by $22,503 for structural balance. Stadium District Debt Service (370) Operating • Decrease revenue by $1,174,368 for reallocation of estimated excess Car Rental Surcharge to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) in FY 2016. • Increase Other Services by $345 in FY 2016. • Increase Debt Service expenditures by $900 in FY 2016. • Decrease Transfer Out by $1,175,613 from Cactus League Operations Fund (250) for a reduction in principal payments from the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. Eliminations Fund (900) Operating • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $1,175,613 to eliminate transfers between Cactus League Operations Fund (250) and Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370). Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year. Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year $ Stadium District FY 2015 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST 82.7% 30.7% FY 2014 ACTUAL 81.1% FY 2016 ADOPTED 81.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (1.6%) -1.9% 90.8% 90.8% 77.4% 77.4% 1,901 1,901 1,901 1,901 2,323,052 2,409,142 1,045,104 2,165,724 (243,418) -10.1% 2,409,142 2,409,142 2,165,724 2,165,724 (243,418) -10.1% (0.89) -56.3% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 4,588,844 $ 4,676,645 $ 4,632,929 $ 4,734,339 $ 57,694 5,706,857 2,500,000 1,786,688 2,135,878 2,150,378 4,635,878 (6,698,594) (1,385,778) (1,385,778) (3,885,778) (2,500,000) 57,694 $ 5,383,795 $ 5,426,745 $ 5,397,529 $ 5,484,439 $ 1.2% N/A 117.0% 180.4% 1.1% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 7,775,065 $ 2,804,153 $ 2,749,164 $ 5,252,164 $ (2,448,011) 5,706,857 (1,600,000) 3,500,526 2,403,000 2,402,500 4,003,000 (6,698,594) (1,385,778) (1,385,778) (3,885,778) 2,500,000 $ 10,283,854 $ 3,821,375 $ 3,765,886 $ 5,369,386 $ (1,548,011) -87.3% N/A -66.6% -180.4% -40.5% 4.43 $ 1.59 $ 3.60 $ 2.48 (13.5%) - $ -14.8% 0.0% Expenditure Activity Narrative: It is estimated that there will be a slight decrease in routine maintenance items completed on time. The number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year is expected to decrease in FY 2016. Customer satisfaction is down due to results from a customer satisfaction survey conducted jointly by Maricopa County and the Diamondbacks. Increase in revenue results from agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks in FY 2015. The District is working with the Arizona Diamondbacks to determine an amount for non-recurring major maintenance or capital projects. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating • Increase revenues by $76,778 for the impact of the additional payments from the Arizona Diamondbacks in compliance with multiple agreements. • Decrease revenues by $19,084 for the impact of the lower stadium fee rentals. • Decrease Regular Benefits by $333 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Decrease Internal Service Charges by $99 for the impact of the changes in risk management charges. • Increase Other Services by $432 for the impact of the changes in retirement contribution rates and risk management charges. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Non Recurring Non Project • Increase Transfer Out by $2,500,000 to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non Recurring Non Project. Stadium District Debt Service (370) Operating • Decrease revenue by $1,174,368 for reallocation of estimated excess Car Rental Surcharge to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) in FY 2016. • Increase Other Services by $345 in FY 2016. • Increase Debt Service expenditures by $900 in FY 2016. 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget • Stadium District Decrease Transfer Out by $1,175,613 from Cactus League Operations Fund (250) for a reduction in principal payments from the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non-Recurring • Increase Transfer In by $2,500,000 from Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Non Recurring Non Project. • Increase expenditures by $4,000,000 for Phase V of the Concrete and Structural Repair project. Eliminations Fund (900) Non Recurring Non Project • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $2,500,000 to eliminate transfers between Ballpark Operations Fund (253) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §484234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle, licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Stadium District Car Rental Surcharge Fiscal Annual Growth Year Collections Rate 2006-07 6,288,093 -3.2% 2007-08 6,132,645 -2.5% 2008-09 5,304,567 -13.5% 2009-10 4,668,575 -12.0% 2010-11 4,988,266 6.8% 2011-12 5,191,682 4.1% 2012-13 5,217,412 0.5% 2013-14 5,394,706 3.4% 2014-15* 4,875,667 -9.6% 2015-16** 5,020,669 3.0% * Forecasted ** Budgeted Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies Miscellaneous Revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of Miscellaneous revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources are solely comprised by Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds are utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from the Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) will be made for repayment of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the reduction in debt service payment will allow for a payment of $1,175,613 to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2016. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 4,430,470 $ 4,473,681 $ 4,473,681 $ 4,556,371 $ 4,594,828 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 1,687,951 1,687,951 $ $ 1,310,888 1,310,888 $ $ 1,310,888 1,310,888 $ $ 1,313,094 1,313,094 $ $ 1,333,391 1,333,391 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 1,562,051 1,562,051 $ $ 1,274,756 1,274,756 $ $ 1,274,756 1,274,756 $ $ 1,274,637 1,274,637 $ $ 1,297,259 1,297,259 Structural Balance $ 125,900 $ 36,132 $ 36,132 $ 38,457 $ 36,132 Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 4,556,371 4,556,371 $ $ 4,509,813 4,509,813 $ $ 4,509,813 4,509,813 $ $ 4,594,828 4,594,828 $ $ 4,630,960 4,630,960 103 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 10,540,187 $ 6,863,859 $ 6,863,859 $ 7,081,566 $ 8,709,963 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,618,271 4,618,271 $ $ 4,696,645 4,696,645 $ $ 4,696,645 4,696,645 $ $ 4,656,789 4,656,789 $ $ 4,754,339 4,754,339 $ $ $ $ 3,028,392 3,028,392 $ $ 3,096,830 3,096,830 $ $ 3,096,830 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 2,500,000 5,596,830 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 2,370,035 5,706,857 8,076,892 Structural Balance $ 2,248,236 $ 1,599,815 $ 1,599,815 $ 1,628,397 $ 1,657,509 Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 7,081,566 7,081,566 $ $ 8,463,674 8,463,674 $ $ 8,463,674 8,463,674 $ $ 8,709,963 8,709,963 $ $ 7,867,472 7,867,472 Stadium District Debt Service (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 4,360,173 $ 4,352,706 $ 4,352,706 $ 4,401,308 $ 4,401,344 $ 5,395,215 5,706,857 11,102,072 $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 $ 4,875,999 4,875,999 $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 $ $ 5,354,078 5,706,857 11,060,935 Structural Balance $ 41,137 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 $ (2) $ 4,401,308 4,401,308 $ $ $ $ $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 - $ - 4,352,706 4,352,706 104 $ $ $ $ $ 4,875,963 4,875,963 $ 3,701,623 3,701,623 - $ 36 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 4,352,706 4,352,706 $ $ 4,401,344 4,401,344 $ $ 4,401,344 4,401,344 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2014 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2015 REVISED FY 2015 FORECAST FY 2016 ADOPTED $ 8,833,977 $ 7,112,947 $ 7,112,947 $ 7,120,142 $ 6,868,120 $ 1,786,689 1,786,689 $ 2,135,978 2,135,978 $ 2,135,978 2,135,978 $ 2,150,478 2,150,478 $ 2,135,978 2,500,000 4,635,978 $ $ $ 2,500 3,498,026 3,500,526 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 3,000 2,000,000 2,003,000 1,784,189 $ $ 2 $ $ 7,120,142 7,120,142 $ $ $ 3,000 2,400,000 2,403,000 2,132,978 $ $ - $ $ 7,245,925 7,245,925 $ $ $ $ 2,500 2,400,000 2,402,500 $ 3,000 4,000,000 4,003,000 2,132,978 $ 2,147,978 $ 2,132,978 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 6,845,925 6,845,925 $ $ 6,868,120 6,868,120 $ $ 7,501,098 7,501,098 Expenditures Revenue $ $ Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 1,274,756 $ 1,310,888 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 1,274,756 $ 1,310,888 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 1,274,756 $ 1,310,888 $ - $ 22,503 $ 22,503 22,503 22,503 - 1,297,259 $ 1.8% 1,333,391 1.7% Adjustments: Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Structural Balance Structural Balance Agenda Item: $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 105 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 3,096,830 $ 4,696,645 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 3,096,830 $ 4,696,645 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 3,096,830 $ 4,696,645 $ (333) $ (333) 333 $ 432 - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Increase Supplies and Services to Offset Reduction in Retirement contributions and Risk Management Charges Internal Service Charges Decrease Risk Management Charges Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA Agenda Item: $ $ 432 $ (99) (99) $ - $ - $ - (19,084) (19,084) 76,778 76,778 3,096,830 $ 0.0% 4,754,339 1.2% $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ - Expenditures Revenue NON-RECURRING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ - $ - FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 - $ 2,500,000 $ - Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ (1,174,368) $ 345 - Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Increase in Other Services Debt Service Stadium Net Operating Transfer to/from Debt Service General Revenues Car Rental Surcharge Interest Revenue Agenda Item: $ 345 $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 106 900 (1,175,613) - $ - (1,174,368) (1,174,389) 21 3,701,623 $ -24.1% 3,701,623 -24.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,135,978 FY 2015 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,135,978 FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,135,978 FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount $ 3,000 $ 0.0% 2,135,978 0.0% Expenditures Revenue NON-RECURRING FY 2015 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Stadium District Roof Bearing Replacement - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 - $ 2,400,000 $ - $ (400,000) $ (400,000) (2,000,000) $ (2,000,000) - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 $ 2,500,000 C-68-15-005-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-15-005-M-00 $ FY 2016 Baseline Budget Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Chase Field Concrete Repairs - Phase V 2,000,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2015 Revised Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Stadium District Roof Bearing Replacement Non Recurring Other Non Recurring $ Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2016 Adopted Budget 4,000,000 $ 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) FY 2015 Revised Budget $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ 1,175,613 $ 1,175,613 1,175,613 1,175,613 $ (1,385,778) $ -45.9% (1,385,778) -45.9% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Operating Transfer to/from Debt Service Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Baseline Amount Expenditures Revenue NON-RECURRING FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2015 Revised Budget $ - $ - FY 2016 Baseline Budget $ - $ - $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) $ (2,500,000) Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stadium Net Non Recurring Transfer to Long Term Reserve Agenda Item: FY 2016 Adopted Budget 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a Major League Baseball stadium, and; • Enhance and promote Major League Baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of existing, baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District As of June 30, 2014 2010 2011 Year Ending June 30 2012 2013 2014 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds $ $ 9,286,098 Stadium District loans payable Total governmental activities 37,905,000 $ 47,191,098 34,515,000 $ 8,106,857 $ 42,621,857 30,945,000 $ 6,906,857 $ 37,851,857 22,440,000 $ 5,706,857 $ 28,146,857 19,260,000 - $ 19,260,000 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. The Stadium District has pledged future auto rental surcharge revenues to repay the Revenue Refunding Bonds of $19,260,000. Proceeds from the bond issuance provided financing to refund previously issued bonded debt for the construction of Cactus League facilities. The bond is payable through 2019. The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. 109 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2014 Total Year Ending June 30 2015 Principal Interest $ 3,250,000 $ Debt Service 439,128 $ 3,689,128 2016 3,325,000 365,028 3,690,028 2017 3,405,000 289,218 3,694,218 2018 3,480,000 211,584 3,691,584 2019 5,800,000 132,240 5,932,240 Total $19,260,000 $ 1,437,198 $ 20,697,198 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Stadium District Loans Payable In October 2007, the Stadium District entered into cost-sharing agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks Team for the purchase of a video board, related equipment, and suite renovations at Chase Field. Under terms of the agreements, the Team provided a total of $10,106,856 in funding for the purchases. During fiscal year 2014, the Stadium District paid off the remaining $5,706,857 of the loan with the Arizona Diamondbacks. Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • Economic conditions – stability of trends, 110 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget • • • • Stadium District Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Premium quality High quality Medium quality AAA AA A Aaa Aa A AAA AA A Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade BBB BB B Baa Ba B BBB BB B Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest CCC CC C Caa Ca C CCC CC C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DD D DDD DD D Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Moody's Standard & Poor's BBB- (1) N/A N/A (1) Bonds are insured, underlying rating. 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Stadium District 112 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2016 Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2016 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 113 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts ESTIMATED 2014-15 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 2014-15 215 215 1,472 1,472 1,687 1,687 0 0 0 2015-16 DIRECT ASSESSMENT 138 1,420 1,558 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,854 11,191 15,045 2,374 7,785 10,159 0 0 0 2,374 7,785 10,159 13,800 100,000 10,900 5,848 130,548 13,800 100,000 10,900 5,848 130,548 13,800 100,000 10,900 0 124,700 0 0 0 0 0 13,800 100,000 10,900 0 124,700 147,280 $ 147,280 $ 136,418 $0 $ 136,418 DIST. NO. K-91 DISTRICT NAME Queen Creek Water Improv LEVY PURPOSE Bond Interest Bond redemption K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest Bond redemption 0 0 0 0 0 0 K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest Bond redemption 3,854 11,191 15,045 Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street General General General General 28795 28529 28793 28835 Subtotal Total $ 114 2015-16 BUDGET REQUEST 138 1,420 1,558 LESS AVAILABLE FUNDS Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District MARICOPA COUNTY STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2016 2015 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Tow ne Meadow s The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadow s 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadow s 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Estimated 2016 BUDGET 3,609 3,911 12,192 1,500 8,930 13,430 600 23,508 3,452 6,000 8,058 7,347 300 1,364 5,286 7,312 3,000 12,671 4,860 5,494 7,758 4,132 6,084 900 600 10,509 2,274 15,763 1,180 7,955 1,200 10,786 8,850 13,477 19,266 1,936 2,657 14,776 4,501 33,867 2,793 3,674 3,985 12,897 1,588 9,378 14,208 635 23,947 3,652 6,351 8,523 7,487 317 1,443 5,593 7,736 3,175 13,410 5,142 5,598 7,891 4,374 6,439 952 635 11,122 2,312 16,683 1,250 8,985 3,578 11,415 9,366 14,261 20,375 2,049 2,811 15,057 4,763 34,517 2,955 115 Estimated TAX LEVY 3,846 3,379 10,797 1,308 12,899 11,561 34 18,761 2,884 6,462 7,643 7,275 269 1,617 4,668 6,439 2,947 11,407 4,271 4,595 6,034 3,601 5,700 821 23 9,246 1,882 14,117 1,110 8,329 5,644 10,171 8,244 12,376 17,576 1,810 2,219 12,670 4,720 31,078 2,596 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 638,366 1,219,153 1,906,989 226,632 7,382,813 1,771,933 344,426 1,656,914 796,381 2,165,663 1,043,451 1,797,737 1,733,799 554,338 1,534,632 1,657,478 583,826 2,224,696 1,127,384 885,067 913,580 470,940 3,757,365 775,390 228,829 3,820,046 139,467 5,631,774 355,650 2,685,103 118,511 3,095,092 2,572,648 3,866,887 4,570,054 1,243,422 227,823 1,921,301 944,363 4,199,126 551,467 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.6025 0.2772 0.5662 0.5771 0.1747 0.6525 0.0099 1.1323 0.3621 0.2984 0.7325 0.4047 0.0155 0.2917 0.3042 0.3885 0.5048 0.5127 0.3788 0.5192 0.6605 0.7646 0.1517 0.1059 0.0101 0.2420 1.3494 0.2507 0.3121 0.3102 4.7624 0.3286 0.3204 0.3201 0.3846 0.1456 0.9740 0.6594 0.4998 0.7401 0.4707 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) 2014-15 BUDGET DIST # 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 4,770 5,226 32,117 1,500 1,756 8,297 5,043 1,020,284 15,487 3,000 3,300 258 3,900 25,344 3,065 7,343 5,609 20,093 13,424 3,601 2,725 4,202 2,362 29,193 3,824 29,385 31,738 3,601 6,000 3,895 3,542 8,877 17,415 14,147 23,472 9,944 6,433 19,928 18,606 12,515 178,904 6,318 15,242 43,935 27,242 27,586 Estimated 2015-16 BUDGET 5,045 5,529 32,734 1,588 1,858 8,781 5,137 1,045,429 16,391 3,175 3,493 272 4,128 25,832 3,242 7,758 5,936 20,480 13,682 3,811 2,884 4,280 2,499 29,760 3,898 30,827 32,347 3,811 6,351 3,969 3,749 9,395 18,432 14,970 23,918 10,519 6,553 20,310 18,963 12,755 182,167 6,438 15,524 44,779 27,764 28,114 116 Estimated TAX LEVY 4,672 4,403 29,554 1,304 1,574 7,471 4,881 911,546 14,585 2,665 3,024 417 3,851 23,001 2,891 6,368 4,624 17,669 11,453 3,357 2,714 3,428 2,166 25,510 3,686 27,875 27,990 3,326 5,441 3,714 3,520 8,215 16,305 12,910 21,910 8,804 5,353 17,302 16,880 11,621 163,391 5,393 13,726 41,101 23,987 25,870 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 729,025 570,943 3,471,068 241,881 252,926 2,796,736 432,594 208,815,371 3,835,925 298,593 616,671 167,852 1,021,631 2,885,426 215,019 389,357 459,127 2,463,584 1,752,366 462,221 168,398 452,028 373,646 3,295,420 333,270 3,605,952 3,865,333 739,963 865,337 295,734 560,324 2,729,059 3,337,000 3,159,953 3,481,094 1,083,390 614,172 2,382,775 2,634,490 1,760,684 36,682,746 1,261,926 1,768,139 7,325,528 4,145,757 3,560,455 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.6409 0.7712 0.8514 0.5391 0.6223 0.2671 1.1283 0.4365 0.3802 0.8925 0.4904 0.2484 0.3769 0.7971 1.3445 1.6355 1.0071 0.7172 0.6536 0.7263 1.6117 0.7584 0.5797 0.7741 1.1060 0.7730 0.7241 0.4495 0.6288 1.2559 0.6282 0.3010 0.4886 0.4086 0.6294 0.8126 0.8716 0.7261 0.6407 0.6600 0.4454 0.4274 0.7763 0.5611 0.5786 0.7266 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) 2014-15 BUDGET DIST # 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 DESCRIPTION Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentw ood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Estimated 2015-16 BUDGET 3,023 6,344 32,309 834 13,149 1,218 4,428 39,500 5,609 3,572 1,476 2,066 5,423 5,201 8,855 9,347 1,252 5,470 27,112 25,524 8,302 2,362 20,819 6,000 1,500 9,120 2,401 15,051 4,680 4,570 4,034 11,308 2,444 10,058 14,305 1,218 26,501 36,600 14,535 8,531 650 6,301 22,966 12,427 28,164 4,157 3,198 6,466 32,931 876 13,399 938 4,686 40,264 5,936 3,640 1,562 2,186 4,786 5,297 9,372 9,890 1,325 5,576 27,155 25,542 8,460 2,499 22,019 6,351 1,588 9,648 2,541 15,928 4,952 4,835 4,266 11,520 2,584 10,642 15,139 922 27,016 37,311 14,810 8,692 683 6,668 23,409 12,659 28,706 4,238 117 Estimated TAX LEVY 2,673 5,888 29,376 157 11,663 388 4,067 34,790 5,104 3,212 1,445 1,719 3,729 4,398 7,771 8,412 1,172 5,085 22,342 21,856 7,417 2,372 19,742 5,602 1,618 8,284 2,231 13,596 4,498 4,239 3,590 9,529 2,204 9,255 13,651 406 22,348 31,476 11,778 7,394 880 5,679 19,436 11,053 25,719 3,799 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 433,990 892,146 4,063,903 1,566,623 1,912,294 759,374 310,876 4,728,103 555,822 510,397 271,844 198,829 413,402 722,204 1,679,985 1,692,394 203,554 795,402 3,512,717 3,233,671 2,874,992 334,501 5,710,573 1,481,924 259,868 703,204 272,125 2,079,331 672,755 409,737 396,354 682,971 468,155 1,221,474 2,397,588 710,447 3,595,643 4,222,074 3,042,630 1,546,175 289,177 939,572 3,400,959 1,405,586 3,030,711 379,730 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.6159 0.6600 0.7229 0.0100 0.6099 0.0511 1.3082 0.7358 0.9183 0.6293 0.5316 0.8646 0.9020 0.6090 0.4626 0.4970 0.5758 0.6393 0.6360 0.6759 0.2580 0.7091 0.3457 0.3780 0.6226 1.1780 0.8198 0.6539 0.6686 1.0346 0.9058 1.3952 0.4708 0.7577 0.5694 0.0571 0.6215 0.7455 0.3871 0.4782 0.3043 0.6044 0.5715 0.7864 0.8486 1.0004 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) 2014-15 BUDGET DIST # 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 DESCRIPTION Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Tow n & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Merew ay Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Estimated 2015-16 BUDGET 5,123 1,708 732 2,358 5,011 813 2,114 2,483 651 2,683 4,200 4,376 651 2,679 1,545 1,463 4,110 3,837 7,801 4,472 4,684 2,927 1,870 3,740 2,952 7,084 894 9,599 538 813 2,521 1,057 2,287 2,729 10,814 6,617 4,554 11,101 2,565 2,114 732 488 1,789 8,560 651 1,771 5,421 1,794 769 2,477 5,263 854 2,221 2,182 684 2,819 4,446 4,596 684 2,834 1,623 1,537 4,317 4,061 8,256 4,698 4,919 3,075 1,965 3,929 3,124 7,498 940 10,135 565 854 2,648 1,110 2,419 2,887 11,360 6,950 4,783 11,749 2,694 2,221 769 512 1,879 9,060 684 1,875 118 Estimated TAX LEVY 4,484 187 109 195 500 100 222 227 455 357 3,712 495 89 2,527 198 156 343 3,685 7,003 429 455 321 168 434 2,976 6,421 78 8,534 60 115 212 108 1,926 2,493 1,140 681 970 9,928 297 114 61 49 197 7,715 55 1,489 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 1,371,749 1,867,696 1,091,628 1,950,554 4,999,613 999,076 2,223,230 2,265,165 4,551,040 3,571,794 568,394 4,953,920 885,691 320,672 1,978,634 1,561,661 3,428,958 1,225,575 740,364 4,287,673 4,547,128 3,211,263 1,676,741 4,337,525 331,788 852,878 779,475 1,977,702 597,517 1,153,244 2,122,623 1,077,849 208,246 431,848 11,401,865 6,814,960 9,702,045 2,366,713 2,972,797 1,136,210 605,088 489,998 1,974,810 1,000,946 545,794 208,054 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.3269 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.6531 0.0100 0.0100 0.7880 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.3007 0.9459 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.8970 0.7529 0.0100 0.4315 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.9249 0.5773 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.4195 0.0100 0.0100 0.0101 0.0100 0.0100 0.7708 0.0101 0.7157 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) 2014-15 BUDGET DIST # 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 DESCRIPTION Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 16,802 6,047 2,657 2,952 45,819 20,288 9,446 6,526 3,794 37,560 32,696 16,119 14,616 17,836 14,331 2,952 9,150 58,242 44,514 5,209 5,682 399,452 5,723 8,560 7,190 44,902 3,132 11,268 50,547 12,397 28,567 45,515 10,331 15,450 16,482 40,042 3,926 5,313 7,674 12,521 52,979 28,432 14,425 53,217 24,121 12,301 Estimated 2015-16 BUDGET 17,783 6,398 2,811 3,124 46,696 20,676 9,997 6,905 4,015 38,281 33,320 16,428 14,898 18,179 14,608 3,124 9,684 59,348 45,357 5,308 5,788 406,956 6,056 9,060 7,324 45,766 3,192 11,482 51,514 13,121 29,114 46,392 10,934 15,747 16,795 40,813 4,153 5,623 7,820 12,762 53,995 28,979 14,704 54,241 24,568 13,020 119 Estimated TAX LEVY 14,884 5,204 2,624 2,649 39,972 17,747 8,721 6,083 3,904 32,214 28,087 14,301 12,568 15,967 12,292 2,869 8,450 50,712 37,563 5,007 5,236 332,434 5,565 7,894 6,197 40,601 2,761 9,790 45,398 11,702 26,416 41,793 10,347 13,443 13,430 35,321 4,012 5,164 6,381 10,028 47,653 24,482 13,835 47,550 19,854 11,811 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 3,449,931 875,009 257,055 514,828 4,848,944 2,354,189 1,257,679 978,987 303,739 4,426,061 3,325,637 1,842,958 1,836,675 1,980,712 1,389,596 459,650 1,196,781 6,160,133 4,133,005 524,065 573,500 27,606,954 626,869 1,122,607 741,255 5,142,137 375,306 1,496,854 5,700,529 1,571,667 2,542,475 4,733,236 1,285,567 1,250,516 3,242,834 3,268,217 659,324 507,802 1,113,466 2,250,408 6,864,966 3,446,091 1,858,596 5,869,112 7,266,362 3,389,404 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.4314 0.5947 1.0208 0.5145 0.8243 0.7538 0.6934 0.6214 1.2853 0.7278 0.8446 0.7760 0.6843 0.8061 0.8846 0.6242 0.7061 0.8232 0.9089 0.9554 0.9130 1.2042 0.8877 0.7032 0.8360 0.7896 0.7357 0.6540 0.7964 0.7446 1.0390 0.8830 0.8049 1.0750 0.4141 1.0807 0.6085 1.0169 0.5731 0.4456 0.6941 0.7104 0.7444 0.8102 0.2732 0.3485 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2016 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) 2014-15 BUDGET DIST # 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 23697 13435 23104 DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadow s 10 Litchfield Vista View s II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigw am Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigw am Creek South Litchfield Vista View s IIIA& Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigw am Creek N 2&2b Coldw ater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Arroyo Norte Unit 4 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 Litchfield Vista View s Estimated 2015-16 BUDGET 20,102 9,001 3,900 11,111 26,082 22,318 20,579 1,299 10,623 4,706 21,211 13,031 7,218 3,744 18,025 2,722 10,204 765,132 1,593 7,935 105,056 54,462 2,066 16,569 25,273 4,679 57,736 1,429 5,059 31,863 6,250 35,465 10,390 83,411 17,678 4,511 32,451 4,532 724 4,786 21,275 9,526 4,128 11,325 26,589 22,748 20,978 1,365 10,823 4,796 21,624 13,791 7,358 3,814 18,362 2,774 10,796 779,375 1,680 8,065 107,015 52,471 2,186 16,844 25,699 4,761 58,667 1,453 5,144 32,387 6,352 36,057 10,562 84,653 17,973 4,770 32,979 4,608 736 4,866 5,446,144 5,583,291 Estimated TAX LEVY 19,102 8,962 3,722 9,790 23,469 19,353 18,709 1,261 9,025 4,001 18,708 11,990 6,309 2,840 13,539 2,350 9,437 563,036 1,266 6,500 95,014 38,246 1,822 12,758 19,665 4,469 44,430 1,230 4,065 25,711 4,869 27,667 14,329 65,846 13,690 3,867 45,165 3,510 562 4,870 TAX YEAR 2015 NET ASSESSED VALUE 2,961,423 2,854,357 1,025,826 1,641,563 3,664,646 2,259,725 2,380,180 1,382,626 2,629,564 561,862 2,427,518 1,890,155 1,376,836 1,424,387 2,338,246 1,323,628 1,087,176 115,843,301 502,678 2,247,553 20,679,239 14,275,527 807,928 3,617,815 8,358,481 3,305,477 18,770,884 2,040,814 4,911,314 10,148,479 1,817,003 8,571,686 2,005,028 22,357,220 17,458,085 4,610,861 3,298,416 6,479,346 1,190,207 1,446,568 2015 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 2,952 2,422 120 Estimated 2015 TAX RATE 0.6450 0.3140 0.3628 0.5964 0.6404 0.8564 0.7860 0.0912 0.3432 0.7121 0.7707 0.6343 0.4582 0.1994 0.5790 0.1775 0.8680 0.4860 0.2519 0.2892 0.4595 0.2679 0.2255 0.3526 0.2353 0.1352 0.2367 0.0603 0.0828 0.2533 0.2680 0.3228 0.7147 0.2945 0.0784 0.0839 1.3693 0.0542 0.0472 0.3367