MARICOPA COUNTY FY 2015 Annual Business Strategies ADOPTED BUDGET Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Sources and Uses by Project Flood Control District Small Project Assistance Program 1 2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 16 16 27 28 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 32 35 36 36 38 54 55 Library District 59 Motion i Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 60 61 63 64 65 66 67 67 68 69 70 71 71 72 72 72 74 76 77 77 78 78 78 79 81 Stadium District Motion Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary ii 87 88 89 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 99 100 100 100 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Table of Contents 103 103 103 104 104 104 104 107 110 Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service Improvement Districts 113 114 115 Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion 1) Adopt the Flood Control District FY 2015 Budget in the amount of $72,495,393 by total appropriation for each fund and function class of the Flood Control District listed in the attached schedules. This amount represents no change from the FY 2015 Tentative Budget of $72,495,393. 2) Approve the attached Executive Summary. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2015 Adopted Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guidelines to conform to the budget. 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Denny Barney, Chairman, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Marie Lopez Rogers, District 5 The FY 2015 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $72,495,393. Capital project expenditures are budgeted at $40,000,000. The budget continues to provide a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Commercial and residential property values are increasing in Maricopa County for FY 2015. The FY 2015 budget has been developed with a flat tax rate of $0.1392 per hundred dollars net assessed value. This has increased the Flood Control District Levy to $43,660,332 for FY 2015, an increase of $3,817,347 from FY 2014. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals $5,700,000 for cost sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2015, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $44 million, which is $3.8 million (9.4%) more than FY 2014. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2013 through FY 2015 $50,000,000 $44,000,000 $38,000,000 $32,000,000 $26,000,000 $20,000,000 FY 2013 Actuals FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. In all, the Flood Control District has 46 scheduled projects totaling $190.4 million in the five-year Capital Improvement Program. There is an additional $9.6 million in the Small Projects Assistance Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 23, 2014, the Maricopa County Flood Control District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2015 Budget totaling $72,495,393. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 18, 2014, the Board of Directors approved the FY 2015 Tax Levy and Rate. 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District McMicken Dam Northern Avenue Parkway Collaborative Project with MCDOT 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) is to provide regional flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation an education to Maricopa County residents so they can reduce the risk of injury, death, and property damage from flooding, while still enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The Flood Control District vision is for the residents of Maricopa County and future generations to have the maximum level of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multi-use facilities that complement and enhance the beauty of our desert environment. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to District social media satisfaction surveys will indicate satisfaction with the District’s use of social media to provide flood hazard education. Status: The District is using social media on only a limited basis and anticipates initiating efforts under this strategic goal by mid-2014. Government Operations By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to the Citizen Satisfaction Survey will indicate satisfaction with the District. Status: The County’s 2013 Customer Satisfaction Survey indicated that 90% of respondents were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the District. Public involvement efforts have focused on a primary audience of County homeowners, and a secondary audience of students and educators that influence the primary audience through word-of-mouth promotion. In addition to traditional public outreach through public meetings, advertising and media relations, the District is developing its public outreach to the secondary audience by creating a curriculumbased education program, designing educational materials for distribution, conducting focus groups to create a targeted social media campaign, and participating in community events geared towards science/technology/engineering and mathematics students. Regional Services By June 30, 2018, the District will increase County resident’s insurance premium discounts from 30% to 35% through the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System program. Status: District staff is compiling data associated with new CRS requirements for an anticipated FEMA CRS audit in the fall of 2014. District staff will additionally continue to work with other County departments to formulate documentation and maximize CRS points. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Government Operations Flood Control District By June 30, 2018, the annual voluntary turnover rate of District full-time employees will be 10% or less. Status: Of the District’s separations during Fiscal Year 2013, 29 were voluntary, or 11% of the 257 budgeted positions. Of the 29 separations, 12 were retirements, five were for family reasons or relocations, eight were for more pay in equivalent positions, three were for changes in job field or promotions, and one provided no information. To reduce turnover, the District continues to budget for retention pay increases consistent with County budgeting policies, continues to implement wellness initiatives including monthly wellness events, healthy eating alternatives and exercise facilities, and continues to emphasize a positive organizational culture. The District’s FY 2013 employee satisfaction survey overall rating of 82% exceeded County averages. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Project Program submittals. Status: Over the past three fiscal years, the District has participated in 100% of qualifying projects submitted to the Small Projects Assistance Program. In FY 2013 – eight projects, FY 2014 – seven projects, FY 2015 – seven projects. It is anticipated that as long as sufficient funding is available, the District will continue to participate in 100% of qualifying projects submitted to the program. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will have conducted engineering inspections on 100% of District-maintained non-dam structures completed prior to 1996; and, the District will initiative corrective action on 50% of identified deficiencies, extending the useful life of those structures to provide ongoing flood protection to downstream residents. Status: District staff has developed a work plan and program for initiating the structure inspections to identify deficiencies, and subject to funding availability and the nature of the identified deficiencies, to initiate corrective action as needed by FY 2017. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will increase the accuracy and effectiveness of flood hazard identification for 25% of prioritized watershed so that underlying County residents can be best informed of flooding hazard. Status: The District identified 21 areas as having the highest priority for new or updated Area Drainage Master Studies (ADMS). In FY 2014 and FY 2015, the District will be initiating studies in five of those areas: Paradise Valley/Scottsdale/ Phoenix, Upper East Fork Cave Creek, Lower East Maricopa Floodway, East Maricopa County, and Ahwatukee Foothills. 6 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type BEGINNING FUND BALANCE SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 29,981,235 $ 22,004,846 SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 43,100,665 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 174,600 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 152,482 INTEREST EARNINGS 250,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 343,926 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 44,021,673 $ NON-RECURRING OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 5,700,000 $ 30,000,000 - $ 35,700,000 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 44,021,673 $ 35,700,000 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 16,392,017 $ SUPPLIES 1,724,010 SERVICES 13,332,279 CAPITAL 1,047,087 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 32,495,393 $ $ - $ - $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ - $ 2,000,000 $ CAPITAL 38,000,000 OTHER FINANCING USES 30,000,000 TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 30,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ TOTAL USES $ 62,495,393 51,986,081 ELIMINATIONS TOTAL $ - $ 51,986,081 43,100,665 $ 174,600 152,482 250,000 343,926 44,021,673 $ - $ $ 43,100,665 174,600 152,482 250,000 343,926 44,021,673 5,700,000 $ - $ 30,000,000 (30,000,000) 35,700,000 $ (30,000,000) $ 5,700,000 5,700,000 79,721,673 $ (30,000,000) $ 16,392,017 $ 1,724,010 13,332,279 1,047,087 32,495,393 $ - $ 49,721,673 $ 16,392,017 1,724,010 13,332,279 1,047,087 32,495,393 2,000,000 $ - $ 38,000,000 30,000,000 (30,000,000) 70,000,000 $ (30,000,000) $ 2,000,000 38,000,000 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 102,495,393 $ (30,000,000) $ 72,495,393 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 11,526,280 $ - $ 11,526,280 $ - $ 11,526,280 ENDING FUND BALANCE ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 11,507,515 $ 17,704,846 $ 29,212,361 $ - $ 29,212,361 $ 11,507,515 $ 17,704,846 $ 29,212,361 $ - $ 29,212,361 7 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOOD CONTROL CIP All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ $ $ $ $ 32,621,798 20,071,995 52,693,793 75,000 $ 159,134 31,934,409 14,696,402 46,630,811 1,550,000 38,450,000 40,000,000 $ $ 1,550,000 38,450,000 40,000,000 FY 2015 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 32,495,393 $ 126,405 (9,928,005) 30,000,000 $ 62,495,393 $ (9,801,600) $ - 1,614,000 38,386,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 159,134 $ (64,000) 64,000 - $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ 15,303,598 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ 72,009,409 8 $ 78,156,525 $ 72,495,393 $ 5,661,132 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $72,495,393 Fund Balance $22,773,720 31% Property Taxes $43,253,147 60% Intergovernmental & Grants $5,700,000 8% Miscellaneous & Interest $593,926 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $174,600 0% Uses of Funds $72,495,393 Information Technology $2,354,485 3% Administrative Services $6,391,038 9% Flood Hazard Identification $7,633,750 10% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,801,887 4% Flood Hazard Regulation $1,412,502 2% Flood Hazard Remediation $51,901,731 72% 9 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2013 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FWRN - FLOOD WARNING $ $ FY 2014 ADOPTED 5 $ 151,447 151,452 $ FY 2014 REVISED 3,000 $ 136,000 139,000 $ FY 2014 FORECAST 3,000 $ 136,000 139,000 $ FY 2015 ADOPTED 2,000 $ 110,912 112,912 $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % - $ 134,600 134,600 $ (3,000) (1,400) (4,400) -100.0% -1.0% -3.2% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,000 $ 7,000 N/A $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,000 $ 7,000 N/A FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ 94,493 $ 94,493 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ 287,694 $ 287,694 $ - $ - $ (159,134) (159,134) -100.0% -100.0% DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ 2,544,797 $ 2,087,185 2,000 4,633,982 $ - $ 7,886,000 7,886,000 $ - $ 7,886,000 7,886,000 $ - $ 7,026,694 7,026,694 $ - $ 5,700,000 58,150 5,758,150 $ (2,186,000) 58,150 (2,127,850) N/A -27.7% N/A -27.0% - $ 4,000 305,643 309,643 $ - $ 4,000 305,643 309,643 $ - $ 164,276 667,115 831,391 $ - $ 283,776 5,000 288,776 $ (4,000) (21,867) 5,000 (20,867) N/A -100.0% -7.2% N/A -6.7% 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ 10,000 $ 84,250 7,426,363 7,520,613 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 54,676,532 $ 54,676,532 $ 39,770,251 $ 39,770,251 $ 39,770,251 $ 39,770,251 $ 39,599,902 $ 39,599,902 $ 43,503,147 $ 43,503,147 $ 3,732,896 3,732,896 9.4% 9.4% GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ (1,526) $ (1,526) $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 108,078 $ 108,078 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 15,000 100.0% 100.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 67,075,546 $ 48,194,894 $ 48,279,028 $ 47,966,671 $ 49,721,673 $ 1,442,645 3.0% 553,167 $ 1,795,587 2,348,754 $ 481,122 $ 1,813,320 2,294,442 $ 466,581 $ 2,004,396 2,470,977 $ 388,453 $ 1,909,732 2,298,185 $ 496,758 $ 915,744 1,412,502 $ (30,177) 1,088,652 1,058,475 -6.5% 54.3% 42.8% 187,716 $ 340,820 1,164,930 780,464 2,473,930 $ 171,406 $ 265,695 1,222,264 492,438 2,151,803 $ 177,105 $ 263,382 1,230,267 507,848 2,178,602 $ 164,625 $ 244,240 1,106,815 559,991 2,075,671 $ 165,678 $ 858,173 1,240,001 538,035 2,801,887 $ 11,427 (594,791) (9,734) (30,187) (623,285) 6.5% -225.8% -0.8% -5.9% -28.6% 2,073,241 $ 5,000,363 7,073,604 $ 2,112,949 $ 6,566,148 8,679,097 $ 2,250,582 $ 6,670,763 8,921,345 $ 2,080,910 $ 6,241,509 8,322,419 $ 2,174,953 $ 5,458,797 7,633,750 $ 75,629 1,211,966 1,287,595 3.4% 18.2% 14.4% 9,066,458 $ 59,850,750 6,152,187 75,069,395 $ - $ 41,559,347 8,856,448 50,415,795 $ - $ 46,982,681 9,041,653 56,024,334 $ - $ 33,525,876 8,263,019 41,788,895 $ - $ 40,828,015 11,073,716 51,901,731 $ 6,154,666 (2,032,063) 4,122,603 N/A 13.1% -22.5% 7.4% 417,456 $ 472,905 488,109 1,263,508 226,835 38,828 525,617 3,433,258 $ 453,829 $ 726,865 137,751 1,605,890 268,329 39,962 697,054 3,929,680 $ 439,084 $ 720,739 137,751 1,602,240 284,646 52,145 727,178 3,963,783 $ 426,957 $ 574,273 143,426 1,645,554 281,255 58,360 739,165 3,868,990 $ 510,792 $ 561,789 560,156 553,376 286,799 215,209 106,357 26,530 824,459 611,920 4,257,387 $ (71,708) 158,950 (422,405) 1,048,864 (2,153) (215,209) (54,212) (26,530) (97,281) (611,920) (293,604) -16.3% 22.1% -306.6% 65.5% -0.8% N/A -104.0% N/A -13.4% N/A -7.4% 1,524,626 $ 464,557 1,989,183 $ 1,592,089 $ 414,182 2,006,271 $ 1,592,089 $ 414,182 2,006,271 $ 1,592,089 $ 465,157 2,057,246 $ 1,730,641 $ 230,853 172,157 2,133,651 $ (138,552) (230,853) 414,182 (172,157) (127,380) -8.7% N/A 100.0% N/A -6.3% $ 619,405 $ 309,681 1,002,133 219,601 2,150,820 $ 693,828 $ 354,231 1,147,103 337,159 2,532,321 $ 722,133 $ 358,607 1,168,044 342,429 2,591,213 $ 647,808 $ 372,725 1,162,116 270,592 2,453,241 $ 890,758 $ 1,125,492 338,235 2,354,485 $ (168,625) 358,607 42,552 4,194 236,728 -23.4% 100.0% 3.6% 1.2% 9.1% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 94,538,944 $ 72,009,409 $ 78,156,525 $ 62,864,647 $ 72,495,393 $ USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES FACI - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT RCOM - REGULATION COMPLIANCE RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10 5,661,132 7.2% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2013 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ 53,987,455 53,987,455 FY 2014 ADOPTED $ $ 302,209 $ 302,209 $ 265,553 4,631,982 201,357 5,098,892 $ $ 316,660 $ 7,370,330 7,686,990 $ FY 2014 REVISED 39,364,869 $ 39,364,869 $ 166,000 166,000 FY 2014 FORECAST 39,364,869 39,364,869 $ $ $ $ 166,000 $ 166,000 $ - $ 7,961,000 155,382 8,116,382 $ - $ 8,045,134 155,382 8,200,516 $ 250,000 297,643 547,643 $ $ 250,000 $ 297,643 547,643 $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2015 ADOPTED 39,364,869 39,364,869 $ $ 43,100,665 43,100,665 $ $ 3,735,796 3,735,796 9.5% 9.5% 326,029 $ 326,029 $ 174,600 174,600 $ $ 8,600 8,600 5.2% 5.2% $ $ 5,700,000 152,482 5,852,482 252,917 $ 646,352 899,269 $ 250,000 343,926 593,926 $ 159,134 7,064,194 153,176 7,376,504 $ $ N/A -29.1% -1.9% -28.6% $ 46,283 46,283 0.0% 15.5% 8.5% 1,442,645 3.0% ALL REVENUES $ 67,075,546 $ 48,194,894 $ 48,279,028 $ 47,966,671 $ 49,721,673 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 67,075,546 FY 2013 ACTUAL $ 48,194,894 $ FY 2014 ADOPTED 48,279,028 FY 2014 REVISED $ 47,966,671 FY 2014 FORECAST $ 49,721,673 FY 2015 ADOPTED $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ (2,345,134) (2,900) (2,348,034) 1,442,645 3.0% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 12,599,408 $ 9,025 17,613 4,475,661 426,109 (3,708,630) 3,240,060 17,059,246 $ 13,795,912 $ 74,847 4,847,907 37,000 (5,402,107) 4,643,777 17,997,336 $ 14,249,382 $ 74,847 4,919,292 (5,429,357) 4,870,561 18,684,725 $ 13,188,644 $ 45,337 4,534,841 26,702 (2,652,359) 2,588,294 17,731,459 $ 13,944,303 $ 56,330 4,668,856 10,012 (5,290,542) 5,003,058 18,392,017 $ 305,079 18,517 250,436 (10,012) (138,815) (132,497) 292,708 2.1% N/A 24.7% 5.1% N/A -2.6% -2.7% 1.6% SUBTOTAL $ 707,091 $ 353,362 91,447 (43,147) 139,579 1,248,332 $ 1,279,250 $ 439,735 155,300 (63,050) 222,708 2,033,943 $ 1,279,250 $ 439,735 155,300 (63,050) 222,708 2,033,943 $ 1,133,581 $ 413,088 91,872 (42,919) 236,315 1,831,937 $ 1,035,949 $ 425,366 126,400 (48,686) 184,981 1,724,010 $ 243,301 14,369 28,900 (14,364) 37,727 309,933 19.0% 3.3% 18.6% -22.8% 16.9% 15.2% SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 292,529 $ 7,236,482 302,198 757,624 2,546,520 1 72,571 76,719 14,042 274,113 (50,830) 54,441 11,576,410 $ 372,000 $ 9,213,363 438,143 332,669 2,711,629 144,575 145,000 13,650 355,200 (213,649) 195,366 13,707,946 $ 5,747,593 $ 9,297,497 438,143 332,669 2,711,629 144,575 145,000 13,650 355,200 (213,649) 195,366 19,167,673 $ 5,659,488 $ 8,256,434 316,463 284,231 2,829,788 105,267 110,340 13,247 363,061 (97,877) 128,306 17,968,748 $ 103,000 $ 8,249,177 442,136 941,065 2,977,058 110,450 89,450 12,050 325,200 (201,670) 284,363 13,332,279 $ 5,644,593 1,048,320 (3,993) (608,396) (265,429) 34,125 55,550 1,600 30,000 (11,979) (88,997) 5,835,394 98.2% 11.3% -0.9% -182.9% -9.8% N/A 23.6% 38.3% 11.7% 8.4% -5.6% -45.6% 30.4% CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0955 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION OUT 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 6,330,256 $ 210,107 615,347 38,388,966 4,976 45,549,652 $ 2,305,000 $ 216,250 351,500 35,395,000 2,434 38,270,184 $ 2,305,000 $ 216,250 351,500 35,395,000 2,434 38,270,184 $ 997,203 $ 150,412 377,935 23,803,542 3,411 25,332,503 $ 1,615,000 $ 147,250 906,268 36,385,000 (11,000) 4,569 39,047,087 $ 690,000 69,000 (554,768) (990,000) 11,000 (2,135) (776,903) 29.9% 31.9% -157.8% -2.8% N/A -87.7% -2.0% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 75,433,640 $ 72,009,409 $ 78,156,525 $ 62,864,647 $ 72,495,393 $ 5,661,132 7.2% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ 19,105,304 $ 19,105,304 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 94,538,944 $ 72,009,409 $ 78,156,525 $ 62,864,647 $ 72,495,393 $ 5,661,132 7.2% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT APS ES ESCO IMPROVEMENTS FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2015 ADOPTED $ SOURCES $ 94,493 $ 265,553 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ 367,694 $ 196,634 $ - $ - $ $ SOURCES $ 62,168,011 $ 62,168,011 $ 40,233,894 $ 40,233,894 $ 40,233,894 $ 40,233,894 $ 40,743,343 $ 40,743,343 $ 44,021,673 $ 44,021,673 $ 3,787,779 3,787,779 $ SOURCES $ 300,000 $ 34,817,699 10,000 4,331,982 39,459,681 $ - $ 14,696,402 7,886,000 22,582,402 $ - $ 14,696,402 7,886,000 22,582,402 $ - $ 14,696,402 7,026,694 21,723,096 $ - $ 30,000,000 5,700,000 35,700,000 $ 15,303,598 (2,186,000) 13,117,598 N/A 104.1% N/A -27.7% 58.1% $ SOURCES $ (34,817,699) $ (34,817,699) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (15,303,598) (15,303,598) 104.1% 104.1% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 62,639,071 $ 4,436,475 $ 67,075,546 $ FY 2013 ACTUAL 40,233,894 $ 7,961,000 $ 48,194,894 $ FY 2014 ADOPTED 40,233,894 $ 8,045,134 $ 48,279,028 $ FY 2014 REVISED 40,572,283 $ 7,394,388 $ 47,966,671 $ FY 2014 FORECAST $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 265,554 $ 265,554 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ - $ - $ $ 27,838,888 $ 54,300,389 82,139,277 $ 31,934,409 $ 14,696,402 46,630,811 $ 32,621,798 $ 20,071,995 52,693,793 $ 30,617,596 $ 20,071,995 50,689,591 $ 32,495,393 $ 30,000,000 62,495,393 $ 126,405 (9,928,005) (9,801,600) 0.4% -49.5% -18.6% (64,000) 64,000 - -4.1% N/A 0.2% 0.0% FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT (159,134) -100.0% (159,134) -100.0% 9.4% 9.4% 44,021,673 $ 3,787,779 9.4% 5,700,000 $ (2,345,134) -29.1% 49,721,673 $ 1,442,645 3.0% FY 2015 REVISED VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % 159,134 159,134 100.0% 100.0% FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG $ FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,302,486 $ 17,512 45,631,814 46,951,812 $ 1,550,000 $ 38,450,000 40,000,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 38,450,000 40,000,000 $ 1,550,344 $ 25,161,980 26,712,324 $ 1,614,000 $ 38,386,000 40,000,000 $ (34,817,699) $ (34,817,699) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ 15,303,598 15,303,598 -104.1% -104.1% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 27,838,888 $ 66,700,056 $ 94,538,944 $ 31,934,409 $ 40,075,000 $ 72,009,409 $ 32,621,798 $ 45,534,727 $ 78,156,525 $ 30,617,596 $ 32,247,051 $ 62,864,647 $ 32,495,393 $ 40,000,000 $ 72,495,393 $ 126,405 5,534,727 5,661,132 0.4% 12.2% 7.2% Fund Transfer In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 Non-Recurring $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 Non-Recurring $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) Non-Recurring $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 12 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfer Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 Non-Recurring $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 Non-Recurring $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 $ 30,000,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) Non-Recurring $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (30,000,000) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 13 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM ACTIVITY FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION FLOOD WARNING PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT REGULATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 17.27 11.15 28.42 25.00 9.00 34.00 25.00 9.00 34.00 25.00 9.00 34.00 14.00 11.00 25.00 (11.00) 2.00 (9.00) (44.0%) 22.2% (26.5%) 2.55 5.73 4.05 10.18 22.51 2.00 5.00 3.00 9.00 19.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 9.00 18.00 2.00 5.00 3.00 9.00 19.00 2.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 23.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 125.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.8% 16.75 8.25 25.00 16.00 6.00 22.00 13.00 4.00 17.00 17.00 6.00 23.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 (6.00) (6.00) (46.2%) 0.0% (35.3%) 10.72 34.75 61.10 106.57 26.00 77.00 103.00 .00 25.00 77.00 102.00 25.00 77.00 102.00 15.00 87.00 102.00 (10.00) 10.00 - N/A (40.0%) 13.0% 0.0% 8.30 11.60 1.00 2.00 4.10 27.00 1.00 55.00 8.00 15.00 1.00 4.00 27.00 1.00 56.00 8.00 14.00 1.00 .00 .00 4.00 27.00 2.00 .00 56.00 8.00 14.00 1.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 56.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 27.00 2.00 2.00 53.00 (1.00) (11.00) 7.00 2.00 (3.00) (12.5%) (78.6%) 0.0% N/A N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A (5.4%) 16.50 16.50 254.00 18.00 18.00 252.00 18.00 18.00 245.00 18.00 18.00 252.00 14.00 14.00 228.00 (4.00) (4.00) (17.00) (22.2%) (22.2%) (6.9%) 14 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Administrative Staff Supv Administrative Supervisor Applications Development Mgr Applications Development Supv Atmospheric Science Pro Attorney - Senior Counsel Chemical Applicatns Tech Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Communicatn Officer Supervisor Construction Maintenance Supv Crew Leader Database Administrator Development Services Specialist Development Svcs Supervisor Development Svcs Technician Director - Flood Control Dist Engineer Engineering Associate Engineering Manager Engineering Specialist Engineering Supervisor Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Executive Assistant Field Operations Supervisor Finance Manager - Large Finance Support Supervisor Finance/Business Analyst General Maintenance Worker GIS Programmer/Analyst GIS Programmer/Analyst - Senior/Lead GIS Technician Heavy Equipment Operator Heavy Equipment Operator - Sr Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Specialist Inspection Supervisor Inspector Instrumentation Tech-Water Management Analyst Management Assistant Mechanic - Automotive Media Specialist Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized Operations Supervisor - PW Operations/Program Manager Operations/Program Supervisor Planning Supervisor Procurement Specialist Procurement Supervisor - Dept Public Works Chief Appraiser Real Property Manager Real Property Specialist Real Property Supervisor Software Sys Engineer Survey Technician Technical Program Supv Trades Generalist Warehouse/Inventory Specialist Water Instrument Tech Supv Web Designer/Developer Department Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED VAR % ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE 2.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 (50.0%) (2.00) 2.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00) (100.0%) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 (33.3%) (1.00) 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (17.6%) (6.00) 35.00 28.00 35.00 34.00 34.00 0.0% 18.00 16.00 19.00 18.00 16.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.7% 13.00 14.00 1.00 15.00 13.00 16.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 8.00 0.0% 8.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 (1.00) (100.0%) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 7.00 7.00 7.00 11.00 11.00 4.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 (2.00) (14.3%) 16.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 14.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 (2.00) (25.0%) 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 10.00 (1.00) (9.1%) 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 (2.00) (100.0%) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 0.0% 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 N/A 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 228.00 (17.00) (6.9% ) 254.00 252.00 245.00 252.00 15 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 991 FLOOD CONTROL Department Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 254.00 252.00 245.00 252.00 228.00 (17.00) (6.9%) 254.00 252.00 245.00 252.00 228.00 (17.00) (6.9% ) Staffing Variance Analysis The Flood Control District has reduced staff by 17 FTE in the Flood Control Operating Fund (991). This was done because of attrition and increased efficiencies in flood hazard planning. Additionally, positions were transferred to Planning and Development to serve the community better with floodplain permitting. General Adjustments Personnel: FY 2015 personnel expenditures have increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments made in FY 2014. Base Adjustments: Flood Control Fund (991) Operating • Increase Regular Benefits by $6,858 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $61,688 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. • Decrease expenditures by $1,065,422 for zero-based budget request submitted under threshold. • Increase expenditures by $479,625 for 2.5% salary increases. • Increase Worker’s Compensation by $12,675 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. • Increase Central Services Cost Allocation by $138,552 for the impact of changes in internal services. • Decrease RDSA Allocation by $1,385 for the impact of changes in technical support. • Decrease personnel services by $312,595 for positions transferred to Planning and Development. • Increase allocation in by $520,657 from Planning and Development for services. • Decrease expenditures by $13,886 for other miscellaneous adjustments. Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Regulation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Regulation Program is to provide advisory information and enforcement services to the public with property within floodplains so they can avoid causing adverse impacts to surrounding property, and use their property safely and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. 16 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request FY 2013 ACTUAL 95.3% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Permitting • Floodplain Regulation Compliance Floodplain Permitting Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Permitting Activity is to provide clearance and permitting services to the permit applicant so they can make changes needed to their plans or pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain use permits completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Number of floodplain use permit applications reviewed Number of map change reviews completed Number of floodplain use permit applications submitted Number of map change reviews requested Total expenditure per map change review 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,795,587 $ 1,795,587 FY 2013 ACTUAL 95.3% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 342 350 350 350 - 0.0% 14 342 8 350 8 350 8 350 - 0.0% 0.0% 14 $ 128,256.21 8 $ 250,549.50 8 $ 238,716.50 8 $ 114,468.00 $ 136,081.50 0.0% 54.3% $ $ $ $ 110,912 110,912 $ $ 134,600 134,600 $ $ -1.0% -1.0% $ 1,909,732 $ 1,909,732 $ $ 915,744 915,744 $ 1,088,652 $ 1,088,652 151,447 151,447 136,000 136,000 (1,400) (1,400) Expenditure $ 2,004,396 $ 2,004,396 54.3% 54.3% Activity Narrative: FY 2015 output and demands are expected to be consistent with FY 2014 forecast figures. Activity demand is generally driven by development and property improvements in unincorporated Maricopa County, and the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. As a change to the previous approach, certain services related to this activity will now be performed by Maricopa County Planning & Development Department staff under the One Stop Shop. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District However, the costs of the activity will continue to be borne by the District. The budget for this activity has been reduced primarily through the elimination of vacant positions. Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity is to provide inspection and enforcement services to property owners so they can develop their property without adversely affecting surrounding property. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request Number of floodplain complaints investigated Number of floodplain use permit inspections completed Number of floodplain complaints Number of floodplain use permits requiring inspection Total expenditure per floodplain use permit inspection completed FY 2013 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 96.8% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 128 100 100 100 - 0.0% 663 550 550 550 - 0.0% 128 663 100 550 100 550 100 550 - 0.0% 0.0% $ 834.34 $ 848.33 $ 706.28 $ 903.20 $ (54.87) -6.5% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 5 5 $ $ 3,000 3,000 $ $ 2,000 2,000 $ $ - $ $ (3,000) (3,000) -100.0% -100.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 553,167 553,167 $ $ 466,581 466,581 $ $ 388,453 388,453 $ $ 496,758 496,758 $ $ (30,177) (30,177) -6.5% -6.5% Expenditure Activity Narrative: Demand is driven by development in unincorporated Maricopa County, and in the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. As a change to the previous approach, certain services related to this activity will now be performed by Maricopa County Planning & Development Department staff under the One Stop Shop. However, the costs of the activity will continue to be borne by the District. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information services to the public and other agencies so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves from injury and loss of property from flooding. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed or electronic materials Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received FY 2013 ACTUAL 92.0% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 95.0% 95.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 98.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 3.0% 3.2% 100.0% 98.0% 98.0% 87.0% (11.0%) -11.2% 99.5% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% (0.0%) -0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise the program include: • • • • Flood Control Customer Service Flood Control Public Information Flood Safety Education Flood Warning Flood Control Customer Service Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Customer Service Activity is to provide responsive flood hazard and mitigation advisory information services to the general public, government agencies and other entities so they can make informed development decisions and be protected from loss of life and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests completed Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests received Total activity expenditure per citizen information request response provided 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES FY 2013 ACTUAL 99.5% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 4,310 3,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 66.7% 4,310 3,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 66.7% $ 79.08 $ 87.79 $ 81.41 $ 171.63 $ (83.84) -95.5% $ $ 340,820 340,820 $ $ 263,382 263,382 $ $ 244,240 244,240 $ $ 858,173 858,173 $ $ (594,791) (594,791) -225.8% -225.8% Activity Narrative: Customer requests under this activity have seen slight increases over previous years, and obligations related to the National Flood Insurance Program and other regulatory tasks remain. The expenditure budget has increased as personnel from other activities have been reassigned to this activity, recognizing Floodplain Permitting staff’s role in National Flood Insurance Program administration and other regulatory tasks. 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Public Information Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Public Information Activity is to provide project and study information services to affected Maricopa County residents and property owners so they can understand how their flooding risk is being mitigated in order to preclude injury, loss of life, and property damage. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3609E requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of affected residents surveyed who 92.0% 95.0% 95.0% 98.0% 3.0% 3.2% report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study Number of public meetings held 15 26 26 26 0.0% Number of printed materials produced 90 50 50 52 2 4.0% Number of website hits received 39,383,600 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 0.0% Number of public meetings required 15 26 26 26 0.0% Number of printed materials (including 90 50 50 52 2 4.0% brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 6.5% that utilized the District website 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 187,716 187,716 $ $ 177,105 177,105 $ $ 164,625 164,625 $ $ 165,678 165,678 $ $ 11,427 11,427 6.5% 6.5% Activity Narrative: Demand for the District’s website content remains high. Public meeting demand generally corresponds to the volume of planning, delineation and capital projects, which is expected to be constant. Flood Safety Education Activity The purpose of the Flood Safety Education Activity is to provide flood and storm water safety education services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can be aware of flood hazards and understand how to avoid injury and loss of life due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that 100.0% 98.0% 98.0% 87.0% (11.0%) -11.2% understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Number of school and civic presentations 4 9 9 9 0.0% completed Number of school and civic presentations 4 9 9 9 0.0% requested Total expenditure per school and civic $ 195,116.00 $ 56,427.56 $ 62,221.22 $ 59,781.67 $ (3,354.11) -5.9% presentation 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 780,464 780,464 20 $ $ 507,848 507,848 $ $ 559,991 559,991 $ $ 538,035 538,035 $ $ (30,187) (30,187) -5.9% -5.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activity Narrative: Demand for school and civic presentations, and other flood safety education objectives, are expected to be similar to FY 2014. Fluctuations in expenditure ratio and expenditures are a result of a vacant web developer position. Flood Warning Activity The purpose of the Flood Warning Activity is to provide reliable weather, water level and stream flow information and flood response planning services to public safety managers so they can make public safety decisions in a timely and effective manner. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 requires the District to operate in accordance with Federal guidance that is normally issued in the form of structure Operating and Maintenance Manuals. The manuals federally direct the District to operate and maintain the structure and other equipment installed during construction in accordance with the standard in that manual. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and related laws require entities such as the District to protect those in a floodplain. In order to fulfill this requirement, monitoring is required to provide sufficient lead-time to allow evacuation of those in danger. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Number of sensor-days during which District ALERT system sensors are operational Number of flood response plans completed Number of sensor-days during which ALERT system sensors are needed Number of flood response plans requested Total activity expenditure per operational ALERT sensor-day FY 2013 ACTUAL 99.5% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 99.0% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 99.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.0%) -0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 243,413 244,930 244,930 247,379 2,449 1.0% 1 244,604 1 247,404 1 247,404 1 249,878 2,474 0.0% 1.0% 1 N/A $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,164,930 $ 1,164,930 $ $ 1 5.02 $ 1 4.52 $ 1 5.01 $ 0.01 0.0% 0.2% - $ $ - $ $ 7,000 7,000 $ $ 7,000 7,000 N/A N/A $ 1,240,001 $ 1,240,001 $ $ (9,734) (9,734) Expenditure $ 1,230,267 $ 1,230,267 $ 1,106,815 $ 1,106,815 -0.8% -0.8% Activity Narrative: New flood warning sensors will be installed in FY 2015 as the District continues to expand the effectiveness of its flood warning network. Additionally, the District will begin efforts to upgrade the flood warning network from ALERT to ALERT2 protocols. One new or substantially updated Flood Response Plan will be completed in FY 2015. Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide flood hazard information and solution services to government entities so they can utilize knowledge of flood hazards to protect the public and infrastructure. 21 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of linear miles of floodplains delineated Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards FY 2013 ACTUAL 68.6% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 68.6% 68.6% 40.2% 48.3% FY 2015 ADOPTED 68.8% 48.3% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.2% 0.3% 46.4% (1.9%) -3.9% Activities that comprise this program include: • • Flood Hazard Planning Floodplain Delineation Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services to municipalities and public agencies so they can have the information necessary to mitigate identified flood and erosion hazards. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Measure Description Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards Cumulative square miles of Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed through the end of this fiscal year Number of linear miles of watercourse where Watercourse Master Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of new Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of updated Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Total number of square miles identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Number of linear miles of watercourse identified for Watercourse Master Plans Number of population in areas identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Total activity expenditure per number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year FY 2013 ACTUAL 40.2% $ FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 48.3% 48.3% FY 2015 ADOPTED 46.4% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (1.9%) -3.9% 3,163 3,862 3,862 3,652 (210) -5.4% - N/A N/A 27 N/A N/A 71,884 317,642 317,642 592,270 47 272 272 164 (108) -39.7% 12 116 116 69 (47) -40.5% 7,877 8,002 8,002 7,877 (125) -1.6% 191 191 191 191 - 0.0% 3,808,082 3,793,152 3,793,152 3,808,082 14,930 0.4% 11.78 56.1% $ 1,211,966 $ 1,211,966 18.2% 18.2% 69.56 $ 21.00 $ 19.65 $ 9.22 274,628 $ 86.5% Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 5,000,363 $ 5,000,363 22 $ 6,670,763 $ 6,670,763 $ 6,241,509 $ 6,241,509 $ 5,458,797 $ 5,458,797 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activity Narrative: Demand is driven by changes in population, land development, emergent flooding issues, and technological improvements. Population density varies with each project, causing fluctuations in the number of residents that will benefit. Studies expected to be completed during FY 2015 include several urban and suburban watersheds. Therefore, the affected population is higher than in FY 2014. Budgeted expenditures for FY 2015 have been reduced since several staff members that were previously assigned to this activity are now assisting with structural rehabilitation engineering and similar maintenance efforts. Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide National Floodplain Insurance Programbased flood hazard identification services to floodplain administrators so they can have the necessary information available to regulate floodplains. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3605, 48-3606, 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of linear miles of floodplains 68.6% 68.6% 68.6% 68.8% 0.2% 0.3% delineated Number of cumulative linear miles of 4,104 4,105 4,105 4,117 12 0.3% floodplains delineated through the end of the fiscal year Linear miles of floodplains currently under 116 139 139 109 (30) -21.6% delineation study Linear miles of floodplain delineated this fiscal 116 139 139 109 (30) -21.6% year Total number of linear miles of floodplains 5,985 5,985 5,985 5,985 0.0% requiring delineation Total activity expenditure per linear mile of $ 17,872.77 $ 16,191.24 $ 14,970.58 $ 19,953.70 $ (3,762.46) -23.2% floodplain delineated this fiscal year 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 94,493 94,493 $ $ 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 159,134 159,134 $ $ 185,554 1,887,687 $ 2,073,241 $ 287,694 287,694 $ $ 159,134 2,091,448 $ 2,250,582 $ - $ $ (159,134) (159,134) -100.0% -100.0% 159,134 1,921,776 $ 2,080,910 $ 2,174,953 $ 2,174,953 $ 159,134 (83,505) 75,629 100.0% -4.0% 3.4% Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: Demand is generally constant, as the total miles of floodplain to be delineated countywide is essentially a fixed figure, subject to policy changes. Program output varies, as studies occasionally span fiscal years, and specific regions requiring new large-scale delineations may cause short-term aberrations. The Planning Map Revisions (PMR) grant with FEMA for the official floodplain map was dropped for FY 2015. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year FY 2013 ACTUAL 2.2% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 0.7% 0.7% FY 2015 ADOPTED 13.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 12.3% 1791.0% 50.0% 75.0% 75.0% 100.0% 25.0% 33.3% N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% 81.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Control Structure Maintenance Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural flood protection services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can have increased physical protection from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 and 45-1424 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Number of capital projects completed this fiscal year Number of Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones completed this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding Number of square miles of area benefited by projects in current five-year Capital Improvement Program Number of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects requested this fiscal year Flood Control District FY 2013 ACTUAL 2.2% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 0.7% 0.7% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 12.3% 1791.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 13.0% 50.0% 75.0% 75.0% 100.0% 25.0% 33.3% N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2 4 4 3 (1) -25.0% N/A 7 7 8 1 14.3% N/A 6 6 5 (1) -16.7% 686 610 610 606 (4) -0.7% N/A 7 7 8 1 14.3% N/A 6 6 5 (1) -16.7% $ 87,233.28 $ 77,020.79 $ 54,960.45 $ 67,372.96 $ 9,647.83 12.5% 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 36,904,884 $ 22,582,402 $ 21,723,096 $ 35,700,000 $ 13,117,598 58.1% (34,817,699) (14,696,402) (14,696,402) (30,000,000) (15,303,598) $ 2,087,185 $ 7,886,000 $ 7,026,694 $ 5,700,000 $ (2,186,000) 104.1% -27.7% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 55,679,965 38,988,484 -42.2% 0.0% Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding Total activity expenditure per square mile of area benefited by projects completed this fiscal year Revenue Expenditure $ 21,679,083 40,000,000 $ 21,509,954 26,712,324 $ 30,828,015 40,000,000 $ (9,148,932) - (34,817,699) (14,696,402) (14,696,402) (30,000,000) 15,303,598 $ 59,850,750 $ 46,982,681 $ 33,525,876 $ 40,828,015 $ 6,154,666 -104.1% 13.1% Activity Narrative: Demand is a function of the nature of projects in the Flood Control District’s fiveyear Capital Improvement Program, and the available funding for the program. The areas that benefit from projects can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on the number, size, type and location of the projects. Dam rehabilitation projects dramatically impact demand, as individual dam rehabilitation projects have very large corresponding benefited areas. As deficiencies in the dams are detected, rehabilitation projects are identified and cause large demand increases. Demand and expenditures do not directly correlate, as project cost is a function of construction techniques, project scope, land cost and other factors. The FY 2015 Capital Project Budget is unchanged from FY 2014 levels. However, the increase in Fund 991 operational expenditures is due to the increased fund transfer to Fund 990 for CIP. Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity is to provide flood control infrastructure maintenance services that meet federal, state and local safety and operational standards 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District for residents and visitors of Maricopa County so they can experience protection from flooding as a consequence of safe and well maintained flood control structures. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 48-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year Number of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed Number of Work Orders completed Number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed Number of dam assessments provided this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones completed this fiscal year Number of Work Order requests submitted Number of dam assessments required this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year Total activity expenditure per Work Order completed FY 2013 ACTUAL 81.3% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2015 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16 24 25 20 (4) -16.7% 768 66 703 45 737 46 680 47 (23) 2 -3.3% 4.4% N/A 22 22 22 N/A 2 2 - (2) -100.0% 800 N/A 801 22 823 22 758 22 (43) - -5.4% 0.0% N/A 2 2 - (2) -100.0% $ 12,861.53 $ 11,211.69 $ 16,284.88 $ (3,423.35) -26.6% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,010.66 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 2,000 2,000 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 6,152,187 $ 6,152,187 - - 58,150 58,150 - 58,150 58,150 0.0% N/A N/A Expenditure $ 9,041,653 $ 9,041,653 $ 8,263,019 $ 8,263,019 $ 11,073,716 $ 11,073,716 $ (2,032,063) $ (2,032,063) -22.5% -22.5% Activity Narrative: Rehabilitation and improvement projects attempt to combat aging infrastructure concerns, and the District has increased collaborative efforts with law enforcement to reduce trespassing and vandalism. However, as the District’s most significant structures begin to approach their design life, maintenance costs will continue to increase on a long-term basis. The increase in expenditures is due to movement in hydrology staff from planning to dam rehabilitation. 26 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Flood Control District Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 (Thousands) N.A.V.) 29,605,196 0.2119 32,778,027 0.2047 45,937,945 0.1533 54,751,263 0.1367 54,862,329 0.1367 45,681,391 0.1489 35,056,838 0.1780 30,665,493 0.1780 28,622,833 0.1392 31,339,191 0.1392 Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tax Levy 62,733,411 67,096,622 70,422,870 74,674,333 74,996,804 68,019,592 62,401,172 54,584,578 39,842,985 43,660,332 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2015. The tax levy will increase from FY 2014 to FY 2015. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate for FY 2015 will remain flat at $0.1392 per $100 net assessed value. The FY 2015 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $43,660,332, an increase from the FY 2014 Adopted Levy. FY 2015 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2015 Adopted FY 2014 Adopted FY 2015 Variance $ $ $ 31,365,181,149 $ 28,622,833,869 $ 2,742,347,280 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP 109,541,563 $ 108,658,355 $ 883,208 $ Revenue from 1-cent Levy 31,474,722,712 $ 28,731,492,224 $ 2,743,230,488 $ 27 3,109,702 $ 2,838,671 $ 271,031 $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Total Levy & SRP PILT Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.1392 $ 0.1392 $ $ 43,660,332 $ 39,842,985 $ 3,817,347 $ 152,482 $ 151,252 $ 1,230 $ 43,812,814 39,994,237 3,818,577 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Levy Limit FY 2015 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2015 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 40,272,893 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.1284 FY 2015 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 43,660,332 0.1392 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ FY 2015 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ (3,387,439) (0.0108) -8.4% 119,600 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home $ 15.36 Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home 16.65 Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ (1.29) -8.4% FY 2015 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2015 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 91,241,312 0.2909 FY 2015 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 43,660,332 0.1392 Amount Under Limit: $ 47,580,980 0.1517 28 52.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2014: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2015: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ 102,100 0.1392 14.21 119,600 0.1392 16.65 (2.44) -17.2% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2015 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2015. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2015 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 43,660,332 $ 43,100,665 Rate 98.7% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2013 actual, the FY 2014 forecast and the FY 2015 budget revenue for this category. FY 2014 revenues are higher than forecasted for FY 2015 due to an increase in granting District easement right of way. Licenses and Permits Revenue $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2015 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of SRP’s increase in estimated net assessed value. Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2015 budget is reflective of receiving $5,700,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. FY 2013 and 2014 revenues are higher than budgeted for FY 2015 due to increased land sales in FY 2013. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2006 191,727 2007 199,736 2008 149,582 2009 135,796 2010 144,249 2011 156,110 2012 186,613 2013 192,535 2014* 151,252 2015** 152,482 * Forecast ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfer $40 $(Millions) $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 2013 2014 30 2015 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Flood Control District fund balances are “Restricted”. Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 37,500 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 94,493 265,553 $ 75,000 75,000 $ 159,134 159,134 $ 367,694 196,634 $ - Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 265,554 265,554 $ 75,000 75,000 $ 159,134 159,134 $ 159,134 159,134 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 37,500 37,500 $ $ 37,500 37,500 No grant revenues or expenditures are anticipated for FY 2015. Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 59,844,252 $ 6,396,917 $ 6,396,917 $ 39,889,983 $ 29,943,735 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 62,168,011 62,168,011 $ $ 40,233,894 40,233,894 $ $ 40,233,894 40,233,894 $ $ 40,743,343 40,743,343 $ $ 44,021,673 44,021,673 $ $ $ $ 30,617,596 20,071,995 50,689,591 $ $ 32,621,798 20,071,995 52,693,793 $ $ 31,934,409 14,696,402 46,630,811 $ 32,495,393 30,000,000 62,495,393 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 27,838,888 54,300,389 82,139,277 Structural Balance $ 34,329,123 $ 8,299,485 $ 7,612,096 $ 10,125,747 $ 11,526,280 Accounting Adjustments $ 16,997 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 39,889,983 39,889,983 $ - $ - $ (6,062,982) (6,062,982) $ 29,943,735 29,943,735 $ 11,470,015 11,470,015 Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 31 $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 34,486,215 $ 46,446,536 $ 46,446,536 $ 26,994,074 $ 22,004,846 $ $ $ $ 21,723,096 21,723,096 $ $ 22,582,402 22,582,402 $ $ 22,582,402 22,582,402 $ 35,700,000 35,700,000 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 300,000 39,159,681 39,459,681 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 46,951,812 46,951,812 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 $ 26,712,324 26,712,324 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 Structural Balance $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (10) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 29,028,938 29,028,938 $ $ 29,028,938 29,028,938 $ $ 22,004,846 22,004,846 $ $ 17,704,846 17,704,846 Expenditures Revenue 26,994,074 26,994,074 $ $ Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Grants Fund (989) NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 84,134 $ 84,134 84,134 84,134 $ 159,134 $ 159,134 $ (159,134) $ (84,134) (75,000) (159,134) (84,314) (74,820) FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ - $ - FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants FEMA Grant Agenda Item: C-69-14-009-M-00 FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants FEMA Grant Grant Reconciliation Agenda Item: C-69-14-009-M-00 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Flood Control RPP $ 40,233,894 $ 687,389 687,389 $ - $ 32,621,798 $ 40,233,894 $ 46,828 12,522 34,306 $ - $ 32,668,626 $ 40,233,894 6,858 $ 6,858 (180,091) $ (241,779) - C-49-14-007-2-00 Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Request Under Threshold 2.5% Salary Increases Work er's Compensation Increase CSCA Increase Reduce RDSA Allocation Filled positions transferred to Planning & Development Increase Allocation in from Planning & Development Other miscellaneous adjustments Internal Service Charges Risk Management Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes 31,934,409 Agenda Item: FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Annual Mark et Adjustment - IT 2nd to 4th Quarter Retention Pay Plan $ Agenda Item: $ $ $ (1,065,422) 479,625 12,675 138,552 (1,385) (312,595) 520,657 (13,886) 61,688 $ $ $ 154,635 154,635 3,633,144 (2,900) 3,636,044 $ 32,495,393 $ -0.5% 44,021,673 9.4% $ 14,696,402 $ - $ 5,375,593 $ 5,375,593 - $ 20,071,995 $ - $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) (5,375,593) $ (5,375,593) - $ - $ - $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 - $ 30,000,000 $ - $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount - 61,688 - $ NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring FY 14 Flood Control Budget Adjustment Agenda Item: C-69-14-011-2-00 FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring FY 14 Flood Control Budget Adjustment Agenda Item: $ C-69-14-011-2-00 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 40,000,000 $ 7,886,000 FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 40,000,000 $ 7,886,000 $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) (7,886,000) (7,886,000) $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 5,700,000 FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ - $ 14,696,402 FY 2014 Revised Budget $ - $ 14,696,402 $ - $ - (14,696,402) (14,696,402) $ - $ - $ - $ - 30,000,000 30,000,000 $ - $ 30,000,000 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget NON RECURRING NON PROJECT Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) FY 2014 Revised Budget $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ 14,696,402 $ 14,696,402 14,696,402 14,696,402 $ - $ - $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) (30,000,000) (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) $ (30,000,000) Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by A.R.S. Title 48 in accordance with District Resolution 2010R008, which specifies the Board’s financial management directives for the District. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Readiness • Hazard Mitigation Need • Federal Cost Share • Municipal Cost Share The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promotes community development, protects natural habitats and maintains watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 2 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2015, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: Previous 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CONTROL CIP SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG Project Total $ Actuals 176,182,553 176,182,553 $ Projected FY 2014 25,161,980 1,550,344 26,712,324 $ Year 1 FY 2015 38,386,000 1,614,000 40,000,000 $ Year 2 Year 3 FY 2016 38,000,000 2,000,000 40,000,000 $ Year 4 FY 2017 38,000,000 2,000,000 40,000,000 $ FY 2018 38,000,000 2,000,000 40,000,000 $ Year 5 FY 2019 38,000,000 2,000,000 40,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 190,386,000 9,614,000 200,000,000 $ Total Project 353,730,533 9,164,344 362,894,877 Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By June 30th, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Projects Program submittals. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Result Measures: FY 2013 Actual Measure Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year 2.2% FY 2014 Forecast 0.7% FY 2015 Projected with Capital Improvement 13.0% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 610 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP. 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADMS – Area Drainage Master Study ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation SPAP – Small Projects Assistance Program CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service Lower El Mirage Wash South 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: District Scheduled Completion ALERT2 System Upgrade Project All FY 2018 Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements 1 FY 2020 Upper Camelback Wash Improvements 2 FY 2015 Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements 1 FY 2019 Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements 4 Outside 5-year CIP Laveen Area Conveyance Channel Improvement 5 Complete th 5 FY 2017 rd 43 Avenue and Baseline Road Basin 5 Complete Berneil Channel Modifications 2 FY 2020 Rittenhouse Basin 1 Complete Chandler Heights Basin 1 Outside 5-year CIP 1,2 Outside 5-year CIP Tres Rios 5 Complete White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet 4 FY 2019 White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2017 McMicken Dam 4 Outside 5-year CIP Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation 4 FY 2017 Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain 4 Outside 5-year CIP Watson Drainage System 4 Outside 5-year CIP Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements 2 Outside 5-year CIP PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement 1 Outside 5-year CIP Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation 1 FY 2014 Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation 4 Outside 5-year CIP Saddleback FRS Modifications 5 Outside 5-year CIP Cave Buttes Dam Modifications 3 FY 2019 I-17/Skunk Creek Land Rights Acquisition and Access Improvement 3 FY 2016 New River Dam Outlet Improvements 4 FY 2017 Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain 2 Outside 5-year CIP Ellsworth Road & McKellips Road Drainage System 2 Outside 5-year CIP 115 Avenue Drainage Improvements/Union Hills Drive 4 FY 2020 White Tanks FRS No.3 Outlet Channel 4 Complete Bullard Wash (Phase II) 4 Outside 5-year CIP Loop 303 Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2015 Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2014 27 Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel th 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District District Scheduled Completion Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements 4 Outside 5-year CIP Sonoqui Wash Channelization Phase II (Chandler Heights to Crismon) 1 FY 2019 Sonoqui Wash Channelization Phase II (Main Branch) 1 FY 2016 5 Outside 5-year CIP 5 FY 2019 5 FY 2017 Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79 Avenue to 59 Avenue) 5 Outside 5-year CIP Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) 5 FY 2014 Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III 3 Outside 5-year CIP Circle K Park Detention Basin 5 Outside 5-year CIP Ashbrook Wash Channelization 2 FY 2016 East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving 1, 2 Outside 5-year CIP Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve N/A N/A Improvement th DRCC (107 Avenue to Agua Fria) th DRCC (75 Avenue to 107th Avenue) th Van Buren St. Channel (99 Avenue to Agua Fria River) th th Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: ALERT2 System Upgrade Project (017A) Project Partner: N/A The Flood Control District of Maricopa County operates a 24-hour rain, stream and weather gauge network which provides "real-time" information to the County and many other agencies about rainfall, floods and weather conditions in Maricopa County. This network operates in the National Weather Service ALERT (Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time) format and is commonly referred to as an ALERT system. The ALERT system uses "automatic" telemetry gauges for data collection. Data is also used to reconstruct storm events in order to show the origin of flooding problems and to provide data for use in floodplain studies, computer modeling of watersheds and design of future flood control structures. ALERT2 is the new standard protocol designed to replace the existing ALERT. ALERT2 provides a graceful transition of real-time data collection systems from providing slow, lean, error-prone environmental data to receiving fast, information-rich, error-free knowledge about events in the real world. It differs from ALERT in that it is much faster, carries more information, and operates virtually error free. Using a channel sharing technique called TDMA, where each transmitter has its own brief time slot in which to transmit, the message contention and data loss problems of ALERT can be minimized. It has a large enough ID space to eliminate the ID assignment problems common in some areas of the country. 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tail water system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. Project involves installation of 15 catch basins, Ivanhoe Drain slope realignment, and new storm drain construction to eliminate all discharges into Chandler Drain. Project corrects the flooding problem in the flat downtown area, removes connection to SRP tail water drainage system and improves measures associated with MS4 Phase II permit. Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation (027A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. Project construction is in progress, under the City’s lead, with the District providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2011A010. Loma Vista Corridor Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Tempe Project was recommended within the Broadway/Rural Drain Master Plan. Historic flooding has occurred in the Loma Vista neighborhood. The project area is primarily single family residential and is characterized by minimal relief with slopes of less than 0.1%. Mitigate flooding of 21 homes in the area during the 100-year storm event by constructing a series of storm drains in Loma Vista, Alameda and Los Feliz Drives with an outfall into an expanded detention basin at the NW corner of McClintock High school. Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Construction schedule is dependent upon City funding. The FY 2015 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (117A) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel improved the Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility capable of containing and conveying a 100-year flood event in the Laveen area from 43rd Avenue to the Salt River – a distance of approximately 5.8 miles. An associated flood detention basin at 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue mitigates peak flood flows getting to the conveyance channel. The peak discharge at the outfall of the channel for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be 2,800 cubic feet per second. This project was constructed by a public-private partnership involving the Flood Control District, City of Phoenix, Maricopa County Department of Transportation and the Salt River Project. The channel and basin are grass-lined, and a concrete low-flow channel carries tail water to the Salt River. The District's project involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project rights-ofway condemnations. The project is being maintained by the City of Phoenix. 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin (117B) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District has previously identified several detention basins and storm drain systems in the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP (1997). Information on flooding and flood-prone areas was generated through this study. Project includes constructing a detention basin that will be designed for a 100-year level of protection and is a part of the overall drainage system plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP area. The basin will provide flood protection for residential developments existing and planned for the area and may have multi-use recreational amenities. 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road Basin (117D) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District has previously identified several detention basins and storm drain systems in the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP (1997). Information on flooding and flood-prone areas was generated through this study. Project constructed a detention basin designed for a 100-year level of protection and is a part of the overall drainage system plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen ADMP area. The basin will provides flood protection for residential developments existing and planned for the area and may have multi-use recreational amenities. The project was completed during fiscal year 2014. District's involvement is 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District complete with the exception of litigation related to project rights-of-way property transfer to the City. The project is being maintained by the City of Phoenix. Berneil Channel Modifications Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley The Berneil Channel generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at approximately the 66th Street alignment. The existing channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. Channel improvements are needed to increase channel capacity to convey a 10-year to 100-year rain event. Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. The Rittenhouse Basin mitigates flows from the upstream EMF. Construction of the basin and flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active as the District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. Chandler Heights Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction of the detention basin is being accomplished in phases. The first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as District funding becomes available. East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Project Partner: N/A The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications. Tres Rios (126A) Project Partners: City of Phoenix and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project consists of the reestablishment of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands, open water marshes and riparian corridors, and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The project consists of north bank levee improvements, channelization, and habitat areas composed of open water marshes and overbank wetlands from 105th Avenue to El Mirage Road. Also, a pump station has been constructed that will provide water to the habitat areas. Construction is complete. FEMA coordination and a Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway are in progress. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Construction will involve an outlet pipe from the White Tanks FRS No.4 to the Loop 303 Outfall channel that ultimately discharges to the Gila River. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The NRCS identified these same 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004, and the District has entered into an IGA with NRCS to accomplish project construction. Rehabilitation will mitigate existing dam deficiencies and extend the functional life of the structure. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is complete. Phase two work includes removing the left auxiliary spillway by extending the left abutment of the dam to the north, widening the right auxiliary spillway to accommodate the removal of the left spillway and re-grading the flood pool. McMicken Dam Project (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives include a modified dam section, floodways, outlet and spillways which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. Project is being completed through nine (9) separate construction phases. Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). The dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking since being constructed in the 70's. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. phases and Phase 1 is currently in construction. 44 Construction will be accomplished in two Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The City of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. The project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Watson Drainage System (211B) Project Partner: City of Buckeye The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended a backbone drainage conveyance system with an outfall to the river for future development in the eastern portion of Buckeye. Project includes several branches of channels, culverts and detention basins spanning more than 10 miles, draining from the Roosevelt Irrigation District canal on the north to the Gila River on the south. The project will be implemented in phases. The District will be responsible for final design and construction of the downstream portion that provides the outfall from the north side of the Union Pacific Railroad to the Gila River. Buckeye will implement the upstream portions through future development and capital projects. Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The city initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. With the city as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the selection of an outfall alignment south of McKellips Road by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC). The project will construct infrastructure to intercept storm water flows from the Granite Reef Watershed and convey them to the Salt River. Project also eliminates a 100-year flood hazard affecting at least 1,200 property owners within Scottsdale alone. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the SRPMIC’s undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the NRCS, the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the L202 Freeway. The ADWR recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. Project pre-design is complete. The selected alternative involves rehabilitating Vineyard Road FRS, converting Rittenhouse FRS to a levee and replacing the Powerline FRS with a system of channels. Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation (310B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate reservoir storage monitoring and warning procedures have been put in place for this site-specific condition at the dam. Site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, are required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall rehabilitation or replacement. Project construction is complete and the District will be finalizing the "completion report" for ADWR during early FY15. Harquahala FRS Erosion Mitigation Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS is a compact earth-fill dam which detains floodwater from the southwest side of the Big Horn Mountains, the Harquahala Plain and Saddle Mountain. The water is conveyed to the Harquahala Floodway and the Saddleback Diversion Channel and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 11.5 miles in length. Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides a comprehensive rock mulch and hydro seed treatment for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon District funding availability. Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for the initial construction. Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. The Cave Buttes Dam is an earth-fill structure, complemented by a system of three earthen dikes, which impound storm water runoff from Cave Creek Wash. Constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the dam and dike system has provided flood protection for downstream properties. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modifications will consist of two major features. The first planned improvement (Phase I) will be a drainage tunnel gated outlet and channel, which will decrease the time it takes for the water collected behind the dam to drain. The second planned improvement (Phase II) will be a system to collect water that has seeped through the dam and foundation. I-17/Skunk Creek Land rights Acquisition and Access Improvements (361A) Project Partner: N/A In the early 1980's, two levees and channel improvements were constructed in Skunk Creek. The levees are located near Interstate-17 at approximately the Jomax Road alignment. The levees are maintained by the District. District staff has identified the need to secure additional land rights to improve access for routine inspections, repairs & maintenance activities of Skunk Creek in the vicinity of Interstate 17. New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370A) Project Partner: N/A The District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the New River Dam and associated works in 1985 as part of the New River and Phoenix City Streams Flood Control Project, providing enhanced flood protection for downstream Maricopa County residents, and the District operates and maintains the dam. 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project will include construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. 115th Avenue/Union Hills Drive Drainage Improvements (450G) Project Partner: City of Peoria and City of Surprise The project is located in the Lower Agua Fria watershed and is part of the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update (ADMPU). The study area extends from Beardsley Road to south of Bell Road between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River. The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The project will be constructed in three phases. 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), which recommends improvements be made to the wash. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This stormwater would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Phase I of the Bullard Wash Improvements Project has been completed and included construction of an earthen and gabion basket -lined channel from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road. Phase II will be implemented as funds become available and includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment, which is located between Estrella Parkway and Bullard Avenue, from Lower Buckeye Road to Interstate 10. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: City of Goodyear, MCDOT and ADOT The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for stormwater management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303 Loop (SR-303L). The new outfall drainage system will collect and carry stormwater runoff to the Gila River and reduce the chance of property damage and flooding the future freeway and adjacent areas during a major storm event. Drainage improvements include construction of a concrete-lined channel, box culverts, storm drain pipe, retaining walls and landscaping. Additional improvements include street and irrigation system reconstruction for the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) and Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District (BWCDD). Project construction is currently in progress. White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel (470F) Project Partner: City of Buckeye and MCDOT In FY 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No.4. Project construction is complete and District's involvement is ongoing due to litigation related to project rights-of-way condemnations. This project combined soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No.3 to White Tanks FRS No.4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Bethany Home Road south to Interstate 10 (I-10), the project provides a 100year level of protection. 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (470H) Project Partners: MCDOT MCDOT studied and is a constructing a new transportation facility that will be a high capacity, limited access roadway with overpasses at major intersections. The parkway will traverse along the current Butler Drive alignment between Loop 303 and Litchfield Road. North of Luke Air Force Base (LAFB), the parkway swings southeasterly to the Northern Avenue alignment at Dysart Road and continues along this alignment to US 60 (Grand Avenue) through the jurisdictions of El Mirage, Glendale, Peoria and Maricopa County. A drainage channel will be constructed along the northern side of the parkway to intercept offsite storm water flows and convey this runoff through other flood control facilities to the Agua Fria River. The project also serves both roadway drainage and regional flood control purposes, providing 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements (470L) Project Partner: Luke Air Force Base This project is an element generated from the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan Update. The project will mitigate an existing delineated flooding hazard on and adjacent to Luke Air Force Base (AFB). Approximately 250 acres of on-base facilities within existing flood zones will be removed from the floodplain which includes aircraft hangars, command posts, control tower, simulator complex, dorms and drinking wells. An additional 300 acres of commercial/industrial/agricultural property south of the base limits would be protected. The project includes rehabilitating and improving the existing storm drain system to collect and convey 100-year flows from sensitive areas on the base to the improved channel system, contain those flows within the channel system and provide a connection to the existing regional outfall. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Town of Queen Creek and MCDOT The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY09, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The channel will collect and convey the 100-year flow to reduce flooding hazards to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. The project includes channelization of existing wash from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road along the existing alignment, and the east branch from Hawes Road to Crismon Road along Riggs Road. The total length of the project is approximately 3.5 miles. The channel will be earth-lined with rock slope protection with 4:1 to 8:1 side slopes and a 50-foot bottom width. The project will include multi-use components such as equestrian and pedestrian trails. Phase IIB (Ellsworth Road to Crismon Road) construction will occur in the future by the Town of Queen Creek and the project remains active so District construction management can occur when the next phase is implemented. 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The project is anticipated to remove the existing floodplain extending from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, which includes 71 acres of land and 68 properties. Queen Creek operates and maintains the facility. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: N/A The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY09, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase, completed in FY13, includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Rd. to Riggs Rd., and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. The third phase of channelization includes the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northwest to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is located in unincorporated Maricopa County. Phase III is being constructed in two phases in which the first was completed in May 2012. Main Branch Phase IIIA1 from Riggs Road to Empire Boulevard and Phase IIIA2 from Empire Blvd to Hunt Highway in Pinal County construction is to be completed in October 2013. The West Branch Phase IIIB construction scheduled to begin during FY15. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain, and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. This phase of the DRCC will construct a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. This phase of the project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will construct basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. Upon completion, the project will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Van Buren Street Channel - 99th Avenue to Agua Fria River (565D) Project Partner: City of Avondale A design concept study was completed and the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. The Van Buren Street Channel will be designed to provide a drainage system along Van Buren Street carrying stormwater west of 99th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The channel project will improve stormwater drainage in the Avondale City Center at Avondale Boulevard (115th Avenue) and Van Buren Street, and solve other crucial drainage issues for current and future development along Van Buren Street. When completed, the channel will provide flood hazard protection up to the 10-year storm event (10% chance of occurring in a year). Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale Project is a recommendation from the District’s completed Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The storm drain will collect and convey sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project was a recommended component of the Metro ADMP. This project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. The project’s involves the installation of storm drains and other various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. Project will be complete during FY14 but will remain active to complete the final archeological report. Arcadia Drainage Improvements Phase III (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase, which was completed by the City of Phoenix, constructed the system outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvement Project. The second phase, also completed, constructed interceptor drains in Lafayette Blvd. and Camelback Rd. This third phase of the Arcadia Area Improvement project will include construction of interceptor storm drains, primarily in Arcadia Drive. This project will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Circle K Park Detention Basin Project Partner: City of Phoenix The proposed project was a recommendation with the Hohokam ADMP. Rainfall runoff from the South Mountain area flows from the south to the north towards the highline canal. Stormwater overtops the canal and floods properties to the north. The project will construct a 35 ac-ft detention basin and will provide storage for a 10-year event. Properties and structures downstream will be benefited. Ashbrook Wash Improvements (670A) Project Partner: Town of Fountain Hills Ashbrook Wash is the largest watercourse within the Town of Fountain Hills, having a watershed area of 13.06 square miles. The District’s 1995 Floodplain Delineation Study for Fountain Hills showed deficiencies at the Golden Eagle Park Dam on Ashbrook Wash, due to overtopping and potential dam failure. Dam safety improvements were made to the Golden Eagle Park Dam in year 2000 to prevent its overtopping and failure in the 1/2 Probable Maximum Flood. However, those improvements increased the regulatory 100-year peak flow downstream. The Ashbrook Wash Improvement Project is expected to include replacing two culvert crossings (at Bayfield Drive and Saguaro Boulevard), as well as cleaning and channelizing Ashbrook Wash as necessary to ensure it can safely convey flood flows. Once completed, properties adjacent to Ashbrook Wash between Bayfield Drive and Del Cambre Avenue will be protected from flooding caused by 100year flows through the wash, or flows that have a one percent chance of occurring in any given year. The design and construction are being coordinated with the Saguaro Boulevard Reconstruction Project. East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve (FCPR) Project Partner: N/A The project reserve provides contingency funding for unforeseen schedule or cost estimate changes. 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Auxiliary Budget Line (FCIP) Project Partner: N/A Several District projects did not have accounting lines at the time of this document’s preparation and were placed under this function code. Sources and Uses by Project Sources by Project 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRN 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 670A - 6700130 ASHBROOK WASH CHANN FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total $ Uses by Project 017A - 0170630 ALERT2 SYST UPGRADE 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRN 027A - 0271032 UPPER CAMELBACK WAS 109A - 109 02 30 AGUA FRIA LEVEE IMP 117A - 1170831 LAVEEN AREA CONV CHAN 117C - 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 121A - 1210332 RITTENHOUSE BASIN 121B - 1210333 CHANDLER HEIGHTS BASIN 126A - 1260131 TRES RIOS 201A - 2010131 WHITE TANKS 4 OUTLET 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 202B - 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 211A - 2110331 DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTE 265A - 2650130 GRANITE REEF WASH 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 331A - 3310130 SADDLEBACK FRS MOD 350B - 3500130 CAVE BUTTES DAM MOD 361A - 3610130 SKUNK CREEK AT I17 370A - 3700130 NEW RIVER DAM OUTLET 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 420E - 4200531 ELLSWORTH MCKELLIPS 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470D - 4701331 BULLARD WASH PH II 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 470F - 4700432 WHITE TANKS 3 OUTLET 470H - 4701531 NORTHERN PKWY PH I 470L - 4701630 LUKE AFB FLOOD MITIG 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 480E - 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 565B - 5650432 DRCC AVONDALE 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 565D - 5650435 VNBRN CHNL 99TH TO AFR 620G - 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH 625J - 6250130 DOWNTOWN PHOENIX PH I 625L - 6250232 ARCADIA DR STRM DRAN 670A - 6700130 ASHBROOK WASH CHANN 698A - 6981030 EMF MAINT RD IMP FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP FCPR - PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 15,000 3,120,000 $ 3,135,000 534,112 3,553,440 2,544,797 563,078 3,084,746 10,280,173 $ 250,000 840,000 3,175,000 656,776 144,000 966,000 86,684 6,118,460 $ 400,000 3,880,000 255,000 410,000 380,000 375,000 5,700,000 $ 8,645,000 188,000 8,833,000 $ 1,400,000 188,000 1,588,000 $ 355,000 355,000 Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 2014 FY 2015 40,000 2,000 1,850,000 2,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 13,000 1,775,000 1,085,000 10,445,000 2,000 770,000 5,000 750,000 12,000 5,000 850,000 5,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 630,000 5,000 9,465,000 30,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 6,440,000 2,000 10,000 1,085,000 2,000 235,000 2,000 810,000 5,000 2,000 2,000,000 $ 38,386,000 FY 2016 70,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,650,000 955,000 11,970,000 2,000 1,070,000 2,000 779,000 2,000 1,000,000 190,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,900,000 5,000 115,000 2,000 2,000 1,045,000 2,000 5,000 2,415,000 2,000 2,000 790,000 5,000 2,000 2,000,000 $ 38,000,000 FY 2017 170,000 2,000 2,000 5,735,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 6,000,000 1,055,000 6,130,000 2,000 5,000,000 3,154,000 780,000 2,000 5,035,000 1,030,000 2,000 2,000 330,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 1,530,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 5,000 2,000,000 $ 38,000,000 FY 2018 175,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 7,945,000 9,820,000 5,000 4,425,000 780,000 795,000 3,000 550,000 3,000 3,000 50,000 5,000 273,000 3,000 5,000 10,200,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 938,000 2,000,000 $ 38,000,000 FY 2019 3,049 6,462,544 1,197,088 658,452 443,915 8,725,595 3,039,126 1,647,673 784,796 7,669,358 2,257,213 2,235,087 1,083,723 466,274 823 2,369,873 5,499,904 1,073,573 1,251,704 11,624 903,964 123,963 74,540 102,958 16,471,105 28,158,994 5,238,852 15,426 18,507,734 13,112,124 90,897 5,872,506 11,217 5,318,913 497,405 1,500 141,383,492 $ 3,000 28,242 3,000 8,402 9,137 1,240,338 3,157 4,832 39,848 10,868 2,543,942 871,110 2,680,588 4,000 419,102 5,177 522,318 1,271,321 29,583 581,838 868 4,383 9,184 4,700 496,385 7,115 8,246,662 108,953 294,572 250,595 19,664 851,340 5,893 23,038 463 3,000 67,779 3,000 21,984 5,837 98,000 2,000,000 22,803,218 Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 54 340,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 4,450,000 9,600,000 280,000 4,150,000 1,070,000 495,000 3,000 3,610,000 3,000 3,000 3,125,000 265,000 285,000 3,000 265,000 1,325,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 6,706,000 2,000,000 $ 38,000,000 5-Year $ Total 15,000 10,445,000 3,880,000 255,000 410,000 756,000 375,000 3,475,000 19,611,000 Total Project $ 784,112 14,838,440 7,055,000 3,201,573 399,000 1,939,078 3,927,430 375,000 355,000 32,874,633 $ Project 455,000 12,049 8,340,786 12,000 1,215,490 6,414,589 1,689,253 8,737,752 3,054,958 1,692,521 8,760,664 30,638,300 16,043,323 33,460,675 1,098,723 12,150,376 3,947,000 5,996,191 6,783,225 1,115,156 9,268,542 195,868 1,053,007 922,148 137,663 4,480,925 130,073 34,297,767 28,297,947 5,538,424 545,021 18,536,398 21,448,464 107,790 16,115,544 5,030,463 23,217 5,621,692 12,000 1,621,984 523,242 1,046,500 10,000,000 316,572,710 5-Year $ Total 455,000 346,000 1,850,000 12,000 10,000 5,747,000 5,000 12,000 16,000 5,000 12,415,000 20,425,000 22,515,000 28,545,000 291,000 15,415,000 5,011,000 3,599,000 12,000 15,000 11,045,000 195,000 1,037,000 12,000 12,000 7,035,000 285,000 9,580,000 30,000 5,000 564,000 12,000 7,485,000 276,000 11,545,000 5,030,000 12,000 235,000 12,000 1,600,000 25,000 7,653,000 10,000,000 190,386,000 Total Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement th 7141 East 5 Avenue Drainage Improvements th 90 Street & Butternut Ave. Drainage Improvements District Scheduled Completion 2 FY 2015 2 FY 2015 th Osborn Road & 12 Place Storm Drain 3 FY 2015 1745 East Jackson Street Storm Drain 5 FY 2015 Central Avenue/Foothill Drive Storm Drain 3 FY 2015 27 Street & Southern Avenue Storm Drain 5 FY 2015 Martin Acres Drainage Improvements 4 FY 2015 th Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects (F699) Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. In accordance with Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) Resolution 2009R003A, the District prioritizes and funds potential local flood control capital projects through its annual Small Project Assistance Program. The Small Project Assistance Program has three purposes: • • • Facilitate the mitigation of flood hazards that are local in nature but pose a risk to the citizens and property of Maricopa County. Using consistent, published criteria, objectively evaluate submitted local flood control capital projects requested by municipalities. Allow for the rapid implementation of recommended local flood control capital projects with minimal administrative delay. 7141 East 5th Avenue Drainage Improvements (69A7) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The project will construct valley gutter to reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of one commercial property and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 90th St. & Butternut Ave. Drainage Improvements (69A8) Project Partner: City of Mesa Project consists of constructing storm drain and catch basins with a connection to the existing ADOT box culvert. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to two residential properties and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Osborn Road & 12th Place Storm Drain (69A9) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project will construct a 24-inch storm drain in 12th Place and extend an 18-inch storm drain system in the 16-foot public alley right of way. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to two residential properties and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 1745 East Jackson Street Storm Drain (69A10) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project will construct a storm drain in 18th Street and an interim connection to the existing, 12-inch storm drain lateral that connects to Jefferson Street. In addition, reconstruct the curb and gutter. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to one residential property and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Central Avenue/Foothill Drive Storm Drain (69A11) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Project will construct a new 36-inch storm drain system in Central Avenue and Foothill Drive and connect it to the existing storm drain system just north of Mountain View Rd. and Central Ave. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to three residential properties and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 27th Street & Southern Avenue Storm Drain (69A12) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The project will remove the existing 30-inch to 36-inch storm drain pipe and replace it with a new 36inch to 48-inch storm drain pipe in Southern Avenue. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to one residential property and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Martin Acres Drainage Improvements (69A13) Project Partner: City of Surprise Project will construct new culverts, channels and a split structure to convey floodwater through the Martin Acres development. Project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding to 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District two residential properties and mitigate flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Uses by Small Project Previous Uses by Small Project Projected Actuals 69A7 - 6991436 7121 E 5TH ST DI F699 - SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE PRGM Project Total $ - $ FY 2014 253,119 31,496 284,615 $ Year 1 FY 2015 212,000 1,402,000 1,614,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 57 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ 5-Year Total 212,000 9,402,000 9,614,000 $ Total Project 465,119 9,433,496 9,898,615 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion 1) Adopt the Library District Fiscal Year 2015 Budget in the amount of $25,226,495 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Library District listed in the attached schedules. This amount represents no change from the Fiscal Year 2015 Tentative Budget of $25,226,495. 2) Approve the attached Executive Summary. 59 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2015 Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guidelines to conform to the budget. 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Denny Barney, Chairman, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andy Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Marie Lopez Rogers, District 5 The Library District FY 2015 Recommended revenue budget is $25,040,402 and the expenditure budget is $25,226,495. The tax levy for FY 2015 will increase from $14,116,305 to $19,504,284, an increase of $5,387,979. The tax rate for FY 2015 will increase to $0.0556 per $100 of assessed value, while the net assessed value is increasing by $2,850,639,783 from FY 2014 to FY 2015. Due to the property tax revenue increase of 27.6%, the reciprocal borrowing program with cities will continue, but will now be funded through operating revenues. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2013 through FY 2015 $22,000,000 $20,000,000 Use of the District library facilities continues to grow for traditional services as well as electronic services, which allows the library user to download music and books. $19,255,955 $18,000,000 $16,791,940 $16,000,000 $13,946,909 $14,000,000 I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 23, 2014, the Maricopa County Library District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2015 Budget totaling $25,226,495. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 18, 2014, the Maricopa County Board of Directors approved the FY 2015 Tax Levy and Rate. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Christine Jasinski, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to reading, exploring and discovering for all so they can be lifelong learners. Vision Maricopa County Library District aspires to be the vibrant community front porch, a destination where people exchange ideas, gain access, foster creativity and pursue knowledge. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2016, 90% of survey respondents will report that the library’s collection of books and other materials meets their needs. Status: The FY 2014 Customer Satisfaction Survey is not yet complete. Regional Services By June 30, 2016 there will be a 30% usage increase of electronic materials. Status: FY 2014 is the baseline measuring year and the data for this measurement is not yet complete. Government Operations By June 30, 2015, there will be a 10% increase in municipal partnerships. Status: FY 2014 is the baseline measuring year and the data for this measurement is not yet complete. However, the Library District has added Polaris to Tempe, Chandler and Scottsdale affiliates this fiscal year. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,216,989 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 19,255,955 $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 377,686 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,442,173 FINES & FORFEITS 711,395 INTEREST EARNINGS 50,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 197,193 TRANSFERS IN 444,350 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 25,478,752 $ NON-RECURRING INTEREST EARNINGS TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ - $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 25,478,752 SUBTOTAL 8,901,299 $ - $ - $ 6,000 $ 19,255,955 $ 377,686 4,442,173 711,395 50,000 197,193 444,350 25,478,752 $ 6,000 6,000 $ - $ 13,118,288 - $ (444,350) (444,350) $ 19,255,955 377,686 4,442,173 711,395 50,000 197,193 25,034,402 6,000 6,000 $ (444,350) $ 25,040,402 - $ - $ 11,876,906 $ 9,185,700 4,163,889 444,350 25,670,845 $ - $ (444,350) (444,350) $ 11,876,906 9,185,700 4,163,889 25,226,495 $ - $ 25,670,845 (444,350) $ 25,226,495 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 11,876,906 $ SUPPLIES 9,185,700 SERVICES 4,163,889 OTHER FINANCING USES 444,350 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 25,670,845 $ $ $ TOTAL $ $ 6,000 6,000 13,118,288 ELIMINATIONS 25,484,752 - NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ 25,670,845 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ (192,093) $ - $ (192,093) $ - $ (192,093) ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED UNASSIGNED $ $ 4,033,579 $ (8,683) $ 8,907,299 - $ $ 12,940,878 $ (8,683) $ - $ $ 12,940,878 (8,683) 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2015 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 18,309,921 3,400,000 $ 21,709,921 $ 18,593,629 4,130,511 $ 22,724,140 $ 21,091,271 $ 21,091,271 $ (2,497,642) 4,130,511 $ 1,632,869 425,000 $ - $ 425,000 $ $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ 83,437 343,555 426,992 $ $ - $ $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ $ 200,000 $ $ 4,515,096 343,555 4,858,651 $ 4,663,011 343,555 5,006,566 $ $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ $ $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ $ 25,525,017 65 (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ $ 26,912,151 (444,350) $ (455,650) (3,504,810) (444,350) $ (3,960,460) $ 25,226,495 $ 1,685,656 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $25,226,495 Fund Balance $186,093 1% Intergovernmental & Grants $4,442,173 17% Miscellaneous & Interest $253,193 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $711,395 3% Property Taxes $19,633,641 78% Uses of Funds $25,226,495 Information Technology $2,218,770 9% Administrative Services $2,676,204 11% Public Library Service $20,331,521 80% 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2013 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 4,609,324 $ 4,609,324 $ 5,087,681 $ 5,087,681 $ 5,759,200 $ 5,759,200 $ 5,501,689 $ 5,501,689 $ 5,350,761 $ 5,350,761 $ (408,439) (408,439) -7.1% -7.1% BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT $ 74,778 $ - 72,000 $ - 72,000 $ 4,169 50,401 $ - - $ - (72,000) (4,169) -100.0% -100.0% 50,000 (26,169) N/A -34.4% SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ 74,778 $ 72,000 $ 76,169 $ 50,401 $ 50,000 50,000 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 16,990,806 $ 16,990,806 $ 14,243,866 $ 14,243,866 $ 14,243,866 $ 14,243,866 $ 14,367,340 $ 14,367,340 $ 19,639,641 $ 19,639,641 $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 21,695,860 $ 19,424,499 $ 20,100,187 $ 19,919,430 $ 25,040,402 $ 4,940,215 24.6% 20,016,485 $ 20,016,485 $ 15,734,217 $ 4,705,600 20,439,817 $ 16,952,462 $ 4,935,600 21,888,062 $ 15,388,640 $ 4,551,808 19,940,448 $ 15,228,686 $ 5,102,835 20,331,521 $ 1,723,776 (167,235) 1,556,541 10.2% -3.4% 7.1% 472,101 $ 255,440 655,306 1,382,847 $ 591,074 $ 284,787 976,142 1,852,003 $ 611,880 $ 279,636 922,104 1,813,620 $ 505,369 $ 248,953 798,907 1,553,229 $ - $ 1,256,902 1,256,902 $ 611,880 279,636 922,104 (1,256,902) 556,718 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% N/A 30.7% 952,741 $ 62,460 1,015,201 $ 1,085,301 $ 36,228 89,399 1,210,928 $ 1,085,301 $ 89,399 1,174,700 $ 1,085,301 $ 89,396 1,174,697 $ 1,149,371 $ 171,537 98,394 1,419,302 $ (64,070) 89,399 (171,537) (98,394) (244,602) -5.9% N/A 100.0% N/A N/A -20.8% $ 303,039 $ 354,964 463,189 154,705 1,275,897 $ 474,631 $ 680,593 689,544 177,501 2,022,269 $ 491,622 $ 653,975 706,558 183,614 2,035,769 $ 393,874 $ 237,863 527,448 172,675 1,331,860 $ - $ 2,218,770 2,218,770 $ 491,622 653,975 (1,512,212) 183,614 (183,001) 100.0% 100.0% -214.0% 100.0% -9.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 23,690,430 $ 25,525,017 $ 26,912,151 $ 24,000,234 $ 25,226,495 $ 1,685,656 5,395,775 5,395,775 (20,952) (20,952) 37.9% 37.9% -100.0% -100.0% USES MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH MUNI - SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES MPOS - ELECTED AND STATUTRY OFFICIALS RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 6.3% Sources and Uses by Category FY 2013 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 116,794 $ 339,505 456,299 $ FY 2014 REVISED 13,946,909 $ 13,946,909 $ 13,946,909 13,946,909 FY 2014 FORECAST $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,912,806 20,952 3,933,758 $ 711,034 $ 684,670 $ 684,670 $ 691,765 $ 711,395 $ 82,521 $ 429,223 511,744 $ 72,000 290,205 362,205 $ 72,000 $ 341,796 413,796 $ 68,852 $ 496,687 565,539 $ 56,000 $ 197,193 253,193 $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,203,891 20,952 3,224,843 $ $ $ 4,311,903 20,952 4,332,855 $ $ 376,446 $ 295,534 671,980 $ 19,255,955 19,255,955 $ $ 425,000 $ 296,957 721,957 $ 13,946,909 13,946,909 REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2015 ADOPTED 200,000 296,957 496,957 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 16,791,940 16,791,940 FY 2014 ADOPTED 4,043,237 4,043,237 $ $ 5,309,046 5,309,046 38.1% 38.1% - $ 377,686 377,686 $ (425,000) 80,729 (344,271) -100.0% 27.2% -47.7% 4,442,173 $ 4,442,173 $ 130,270 (20,952) 109,318 3.0% -100.0% 2.5% $ 26,725 (16,000) (144,603) (160,603) 3.9% -22.2% -42.3% -38.8% ALL REVENUES $ 21,695,860 $ 19,424,499 $ 20,100,187 $ 19,919,430 $ 25,040,402 $ 4,940,215 24.6% TOTAL SOURCES $ 21,695,860 $ 19,424,499 $ 20,100,187 $ 19,919,430 $ 25,040,402 $ 4,940,215 24.6% 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 6,875,909 $ 1,157,292 3,339 2,873,089 220,702 (12,800) 12,800 11,130,331 $ 6,808,852 $ 1,197,315 2,876,666 133,523 (12,800) 91,442 11,094,998 $ 7,595,971 $ 1,294,867 251 3,043,826 66,439 (12,800) 91,442 12,079,996 $ 7,233,061 $ 1,123,734 1,328 2,946,367 456 (13,868) 90,402 11,381,480 $ 7,207,067 $ 1,327,764 3,025,221 240,087 (13,500) 90,267 11,876,906 $ 388,904 (32,897) 251 18,605 (173,648) 700 1,175 203,090 5.1% -2.5% 100.0% 0.6% -261.4% 5.5% 1.3% 1.7% 6,857,355 $ 976 667,093 7,525,424 $ 8,144,382 $ 21,000 400,000 732 8,566,114 $ 8,027,460 $ 21,000 676,842 732 8,726,034 $ 6,301,862 $ 14,601 341,982 436 6,658,881 $ 8,954,118 $ 21,000 210,000 582 9,185,700 $ (926,658) 466,842 150 (459,666) -11.5% 0.0% 69.0% 20.5% -5.3% $ 563,335 $ 507,821 913,102 1,938,405 504 39,698 30,872 234,686 554,703 4,783,126 $ 660,493 $ 671,619 691,171 2,733,905 50,000 87,900 246,225 722,136 456 5,863,905 $ 882,794 $ 671,619 685,586 2,733,905 75,000 87,900 246,725 722,136 456 6,106,121 $ 901,086 $ 650,828 652,156 2,758,157 38,451 54,399 229,270 556,177 473 5,840,997 $ 821,540 $ 611,622 699,246 1,199,905 57,010 74,800 249,398 34,010 415,930 428 4,163,889 $ 61,254 59,997 (13,660) 1,534,000 17,990 13,100 (2,673) (34,010) 306,206 28 1,942,232 6.9% 8.9% -2.0% 56.1% N/A 24.0% 14.9% -1.1% N/A 42.4% 6.1% 31.8% $ $ 251,549 $ 251,549 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 118,876 $ 118,876 $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A ALL EXPENDITURES $ 23,690,430 $ 25,525,017 $ 26,912,151 $ 24,000,234 $ 25,226,495 $ 1,685,656 6.3% TOTAL USES $ 23,690,430 $ 25,525,017 $ 26,912,151 $ 24,000,234 $ 25,226,495 $ 1,685,656 6.3% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0845 - SUPPORT AND CARE OF PERSONS 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL $ Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2013 ACTUAL $ FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % (148,382) $ 265,176 116,794 $ - $ 200,000 200,000 $ - $ 425,000 425,000 $ 106,446 $ 270,000 376,446 $ - $ - $ N/A (425,000) -100.0% (425,000) -100.0% SOURCES $ 18,659,570 $ 1,175,012 19,834,582 $ 15,509,403 $ 3,604,810 19,114,213 $ 15,531,665 $ 3,885,321 19,416,986 $ 15,711,522 $ 3,554,810 19,266,332 $ 20,899,178 $ 20,899,178 $ 5,367,513 34.6% (3,885,321) -100.0% 1,482,192 7.6% $ SOURCES $ 4,311,477 $ 4,311,477 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,663,011 $ 4,663,011 $ 4,663,011 $ 4,663,011 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ $ 9,570 $ 10,317,623 10,327,193 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,451 $ 18,451 $ - $ 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 6,000 N/A N/A N/A SOURCES $ (1,399,724) $ (11,494,462) (12,894,186) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ 455,650 3,504,810 3,960,460 -50.6% -100.0% -89.9% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 21,432,511 $ 263,349 $ 21,695,860 $ 19,124,499 $ 300,000 $ 19,424,499 $ 19,294,676 $ 805,511 $ 20,100,187 $ 19,599,430 $ 320,000 $ 19,919,430 $ 25,034,402 $ 6,000 $ 25,040,402 $ 5,739,726 (799,511) 4,940,215 29.7% -99.3% 24.6% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ 68 (83,437) (83,437) -1.8% -1.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 116,796 $ 116,796 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 385,129 $ 385,129 $ - $ - $ $ 18,415,991 $ 12,492,762 30,908,753 $ 18,309,921 $ 3,400,000 21,709,921 $ 18,593,629 $ 4,130,511 22,724,140 $ 17,061,604 $ 3,317,719 20,379,323 $ 21,091,271 $ 21,091,271 $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 4,384,055 $ 1,175,012 5,559,067 $ 4,515,096 $ 343,555 4,858,651 $ 4,663,011 $ 343,555 5,006,566 $ 4,135,782 $ 343,555 4,479,337 $ 4,579,574 $ 4,579,574 $ 83,437 343,555 426,992 1.8% 100.0% 8.5% $ FUND TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 100.0% 100.0% $ FUND TOTAL USES $ (1,399,724) $ (11,494,462) (12,894,186) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ (444,350) $ (444,350) $ (455,650) (3,504,810) (3,960,460) 50.6% 100.0% 89.9% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 21,400,322 $ 2,290,108 $ 23,690,430 $ 21,925,017 $ 3,600,000 $ 25,525,017 $ 22,356,640 $ 4,555,511 $ 26,912,151 $ 20,297,386 $ 3,702,848 $ 24,000,234 $ 25,226,495 $ - $ 25,226,495 $ (2,869,855) 4,555,511 1,685,656 -12.8% 100.0% 6.3% 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 425,000 425,000 (2,497,642) 4,130,511 1,632,869 100.0% 100.0% -13.4% 100.0% 7.2% Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 444,350 Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Non-Recurring $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ - 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ - Non-Recurring $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ - 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 $ 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 444,350 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Non-Recurring $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (4,404,810) $ (4,404,810) $ (4,404,810) $ (444,350) (444,350) Operating $ (900,000) $ (900,000) $ (900,000) $ Non-Recurring $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ALL FUNDS 69 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 1,243,555 $ 1,243,555 $ 1,243,555 $ 444,350 Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Non-Recurring $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ - 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ - Non-Recurring $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ - $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - Non-Recurring $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ - $ 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 4,404,810 $ 444,350 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 444,350 Non-Recurring $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (4,404,810) $ (4,404,810) $ (4,404,810) $ (444,350) (444,350) Operating $ (900,000) $ (900,000) $ (900,000) $ Non-Recurring $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ALL FUNDS 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM ACTIVITY GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTED AND STATUTRY OFFICIALS PROGRAM TOTAL INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2014 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED TO ADOPTED VAR % REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE - - .00 - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 6.00 6.00 3.00 15.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 13.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 .00 13.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 13.00 12.00 12.00 (6.00) (4.00) (3.00) 12.00 (1.00) (100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%) N/A (7.7%) 4.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 14.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 13.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 (4.00) (1.00) (1.00) 7.00 1.00 (100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%) 100.0% 7.7% 141.73 141.73 170.73 137.73 137.73 164.73 139.73 139.73 165.73 140.73 140.73 167.73 137.73 137.73 164.73 (2.00) (2.00) (1.00) (1.4%) (1.4%) (0.6%) Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Department Facilities Planner Deputy Director - Library Director - Library Executive Assistant Finance Manager Finance Support Supervisor Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Manager Human Resources Specialist IT Division Manager IT Services Supv Librarian Library Administrator Library Clerk Library Coordinator Library Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized PC/LAN Technician Systems Administrator Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer - Senior/Lead Department Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 31.00 31.00 33.00 33.00 32.00 (1.00) (3.0%) 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 (1.00) (25.0%) 49.49 48.49 47.49 48.49 47.49 0.0% 11.00 11.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.0% 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 0.0% 22.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 0.0% 12.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 12.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 100.0% 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 170.73 164.73 165.73 167.73 164.73 (1.00) (0.6% ) 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 246 Department Total FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2014 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED VAR % ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE (0.8%) 117.73 119.73 116.73 (1.00) 117.73 119.73 0.0% 48.00 48.00 51.00 47.00 48.00 165.73 167.73 164.73 (1.00) (0.6% ) 164.73 170.73 General Adjustments Personnel: FY 2015 personnel expenditures increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments made in FY 2014. Base Adjustments: Library District Fund (244) • Increase in revenue by $4,106,659 for the impact of changes in Property Tax. • Increase Regular Benefits by $3,697 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase Internal Service Charges by $8,995 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. • Increase expenditures by $2.6 million for the Library Assistance Program. • Increase expenditures by $200,000 for IT equipment replacement. • Increase expenditures by $239,125 for 2.5% salary adjustments. • Increase expenditures by $125,000 for the Summer Reading Program growth and digital development. • Increase expenditures by $122,252 for Polaris system hosting for existing systems. • Increase expenditures by $70,000 for Polaris system in Tempe. • Increase expenditures by $64,070 for the Central Services Cost Allocation. • Decrease expenditures by $1 million for other operating reductions. Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) • Increase revenues by $64,478 due to improved fee collection. • Increase Regular Benefits by $932 for the changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase expenditures by $63,546 for the changes in programs. Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. 72 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program FY 2013 ACTUAL 47.1% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 48.9% 48.9% FY 2015 ADOPTED 48.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.3%) -0.5% 93.9% 88.0% 88.0% 87.7% (0.3%) -0.4% 94.3% 91.3% 91.3% 91.8% 0.5% 0.5% N/A N/A N/A 55.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90.0% N/A N/A Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: Discretionary services. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Number of items circulated Number of programs and activities provided Number of digital materials accessed Number of website visits Number of items requested to be circulated Number of digital materials requested to be accessed Total expenditure per item circulated FY 2013 ACTUAL 47.1% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 48.9% 48.9% Total expenditure per digital material accessed REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.3%) -0.5% 93.9% 88.0% 88.0% 87.7% (0.3%) -0.4% 94.3% 91.3% 91.3% 91.8% 0.5% 0.5% 7,477,422 5,012 N/A N/A 7,808,000 N/A $ FY 2015 ADOPTED 48.6% 2.68 7,527,476 4,000 720,000 3,480,000 8,000,000 720,000 7,527,476 4,000 720,000 3,480,000 8,000,000 720,000 8,000,000 5,500 1,000,000 3,715,000 8,000,000 1,000,000 472,524 1,500 280,000 235,000 280,000 6.3% 37.5% 38.9% 6.8% 0.0% 38.9% $ 2.25 $ 2.04 $ 1.90 $ 0.35 15.5% N/A $ 23.55 $ 21.37 $ 15.23 $ 8.32 35.3% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 265,176 $ 425,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 2,607,407 1,571,189 1,468,678 1,215,537 4,311,477 4,663,011 4,663,011 4,579,574 (2,574,736) (900,000) (900,000) (444,350) $ 4,609,324 $ 5,759,200 $ 5,501,689 $ 5,350,761 $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ (425,000) (355,652) (83,437) 455,650 (408,439) -100.0% -22.6% -1.8% -50.6% -7.1% 116,796 $ 425,000 $ 385,129 $ - $ 425,000 16,915,358 12,764,451 11,767,729 11,093,462 1,670,989 5,559,067 4,663,011 4,135,782 4,579,574 83,437 (2,574,736) (900,000) (900,000) (444,350) (455,650) $ 20,016,485 $ 16,952,462 $ 15,388,640 $ 15,228,686 $ 1,723,776 100.0% 13.1% 1.8% 50.6% 10.2% Expenditure 73 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Activity Narrative: The Library District Grant Fund (242) revenues decreased due to the expiration of large grants during FY 2014. Library Grant Fund (242) expenditures had a corresponding decrease. Library District Fund (244) has a decrease in revenues due to an elimination of one-time transfers from the Library District Capital Fund (465). Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) revenues decreased due to a reduction in one-time revenue received from the Town of Gilbert during FY 2014. The Library District Fund (244) expenditures decreased due to the escalation of the City of Surprise cost share percentage for the Northwest Regional Library – up to 75% in FY 2015. Additional decreases came from moving Polaris hosting of other Library Systems to being hosted at Polaris instead of directly by the Library District, the elimination of some rents, reductions in materials and reductions in personnel. The Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) has a decrease due to the one-time expenditure made on behalf of the Town of Gilbert in FY 2014. Support for Municipalities Services Activity The Municipalities Services Activity purpose is to provide a better library service to Maricopa County Residents through implementation of our Polaris Program, consulting services and partnerships with cities and towns. Mandates: Discretionary services. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Expenditure Ratio Expenditure Measure Description Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program Number of Summer Reading Program participants Number of materials provided through Materials Assistance Program Number of materials requested to be provided through Materials Assistance Program FY 2013 ACTUAL N/A Number of people requesting Summer Reading Program participation Total expenditure per Summer Reading Program participant 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL USES $ $ FY 2014 FY 2014 FORECAST REVISED N/A N/A FY 2015 ADOPTED 55.0% 90.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - - 95,000 95,000 N/A N/A - - 104,000 104,000 N/A N/A - - 104,000 104,000 N/A N/A - - 95,000 95,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 53.71 - $ 4,935,600 $ 4,935,600 $ 4,551,808 $ 4,551,808 $ 5,102,835 $ 5,102,835 N/A $ $ N/A N/A N/A (167,235) (167,235) -3.4% -3.4% Activity Narrative: The FY 2015 budget supports the Department in meeting 100% of demand for services. This Activity includes services for support of the Intergovernmental Reciprocal Borrowing Program and Materials Assistance Program. These programs provide essential resources to libraries in the cities and towns of Maricopa County. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last ten fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2015. The tax levy will increase from FY 2014 to FY 2015 due to the increase in property values county-wide, combined with a tax rate increase. The tax rate will increase to $0.0556 per $100 of assessed value. Library District Tax Levy Tax Rate Net Assessed (per $100 Value N.A.V.) (Thousands) 30,066,987 0.0521 33,197,218 0.0521 36,294,693 0.0507 49,534,573 0.0391 58,303,635 0.0353 57,984,051 0.0353 49,707,952 0.0412 38,760,297 0.0492 34,400,455 0.0492 32,229,007 0.0438 37,616,986 0.0556 Fiscal Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tax Levy 15,534,579 17,295,751 18,401,410 19,368,018 20,581,183 20,468,370 20,479,676 19,070,066 16,925,024 14,116,305 19,504,284 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fiscal Year The FY 2015 budget includes a secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $19,504,284, an increase of $5,387,979 from the FY 2014 Adopted Levy. FY 2015 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND RATES LIBRARY DISTRICT Description FY 2015 Adopted FY 2014 Adopted FY 2015 Variance Net Assessed Value $ $ 35,079,646,593 32,229,006,810 2,850,639,783 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP 679,290,980 671,847,721 7,443,259 $ Revenue from 1-cent Levy 35,758,937,573 32,900,854,531 2,858,083,042 $ 75 3,575,894 3,290,085 285,809 $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.0556 0.0438 0.0118 $ 19,504,284 14,116,305 5,387,979 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 377,686 294,269 83,417 $ 19,881,970 14,410,574 5,471,396 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Levy Limit FY 2015 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY VS. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2015 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 26,029,098 0.0742 FY 2015 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP): Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assess Value) $ 19,504,284 0.0556 Amount Under Limit: $ 6,524,814 0.0186 25.1% FY 2015 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2015 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 14,417,735 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0411 FY 2015 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 19,504,284 0.0556 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ FY 2015 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 76 $ (5,086,549) -35.3% (0.0145) 119,600 4.92 6.65 (1.73) -35.2% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2014: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2015: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ 102,100 0.0438 4.47 119,600 0.0556 6.65 (2.18) -48.8% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2015 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2015. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2015 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 19,504,284 $ 19,255,955 Rate 98.7% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2006 270,953 2007 246,032 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011 269,405 2012 327,394 2013 329,011 2014* 296,957 2015** 377,686 * Forecast ** Budget 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2014 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library $ 901,768 Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library FY 2015 $ 42,570 26,200 26,855 2,043,368 TOTAL $ 938,895 941,470 3,912,806 2,100,803 $ 3,109,123 Fines and Forfeits Fines and Forfeits $715,000 The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2013, the anticipated amount for FY 2014 and the budget for FY 2015. $710,000 $705,000 $700,000 $695,000 $690,000 $685,000 $680,000 FY 2013 Actual Miscellaneous Revenue FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget Miscellaneous Revenue The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the left illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2013 through the FY 2015 budget. $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Forecast FY 2015 Budget Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Balance Summary Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 ADOPTED - $ FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST $ - $ - $ - $ (148,382) $ 265,176 116,794 $ 200,000 200,000 $ $ $ 106,446 270,000 376,446 $ $ 425,000 425,000 $ - $ 200,000 200,000 $ 425,000 425,000 $ 385,129 385,129 $ - (148,382) $ - $ - $ 106,446 $ - - $ - Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments $ 2 $ - $ - $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ $ FY 2015 ADOPTED 116,796 116,796 (8,683) (8,683) $ (8,683) (8,683) (8,683) Library District Grant Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement, which may result in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 15,902,206 $ 2,595,708 $ 2,595,708 $ 4,828,038 $ 3,715,047 $ 18,659,570 1,175,012 19,834,582 $ 15,509,403 3,604,810 19,114,213 $ 15,531,665 3,885,321 19,416,986 $ 15,711,522 3,554,810 19,266,332 $ 20,899,178 20,899,178 $ $ 18,593,629 4,130,511 22,724,140 $ 17,061,604 3,317,719 20,379,323 $ $ 18,309,921 3,400,000 21,709,921 (2,800,518) $ $ $ $ Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 18,415,991 12,492,762 30,908,753 Structural Balance $ 243,579 $ Accounting Adjustments $ 3 $ - $ $ 4,828,038 4,828,038 $ - $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 FORECAST $ $ $ 79 $ $ $ $ (3,061,964) $ - $ $ (1,350,082) $ 21,091,271 21,091,271 (192,093) $ - $ - - $ (711,446) (711,446) $ 3,715,047 3,715,047 $ 3,522,954 3,522,954 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 1,574,541 $ 343,555 $ 343,555 $ 326,951 $ 510,625 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,311,477 4,311,477 $ $ 4,515,096 4,515,096 $ $ 4,663,011 4,663,011 $ $ 4,663,011 4,663,011 $ $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 $ 4,384,055 1,175,012 5,559,067 $ $ $ 4,135,782 343,555 4,479,337 $ $ 4,663,011 343,555 5,006,566 $ $ 4,515,096 343,555 4,858,651 $ 4,579,574 4,579,574 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ (72,578) $ - $ - $ 527,229 $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 326,951 326,951 - $ $ - $ $ 510,625 510,625 $ $ 510,625 510,625 $ $ Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 1,716,911 $ 12,285,661 $ 12,285,661 $ 12,044,103 $ 8,901,299 $ $ $ $ 18,451 18,451 $ $ - $ $ - $ 6,000 6,000 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 9,570 10,317,623 10,327,193 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ - $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ - Structural Balance $ 9,570 $ - $ - $ 18,451 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 9,124,406 9,124,406 $ $ 9,124,406 9,124,406 $ $ 8,901,299 8,901,299 $ $ 8,907,299 8,907,299 12,044,103 12,044,103 $ $ 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 225,000 $ 50,000 150,000 25,000 225,000 50,000 150,000 25,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ (425,000) $ (50,000) (150,000) (25,000) (200,000) (425,000) (50,000) (150,000) (25,000) (200,000) FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ - $ - FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants MC Summer Reading Program Grant AZ State Library Technology Act Grant Library District ASLAPR Grant FY14 Agenda Item: C-65-13-039-M-00 C-65-13-041-M-00 C-65-14-025-G-00 FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants MC Summer Reading Program Grant AZ State Library Technology Act Grant Library District ASLAPR Grant FY14 Grant Reconciliation Agenda Item: C-65-13-039-M-00 C-65-13-041-M-00 C-65-14-025-G-00 81 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Library RPP Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment 15,509,403 $ 283,708 $ 283,708 - $ - 22,262 22,262 $ 18,593,629 $ 15,531,665 $ 64,503 $ 51,840 12,663 - $ - $ - C-49-14-008-2-00 $ C-65-14-032-M-00 Agenda Item: $ $ C-65-14-032-M-00 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Library Assistance Program IT Equipment Replacement 2.5% Salary Adjustments Summer Reading Program Growth and Digital Development Polaris Hosting of Existing Systems Polaris - Tempe CSCA Increase Other Reductions Internal Service Charges Risk Management General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes (Increase rate by .0118, from .0438 to .0556) 18,309,921 $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Annual Mark et Adjustment - IT 2nd to 4th Quarter Retention Pay Plan General Revenues Property Taxes Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment $ 1,283,116 1,283,116 (22,262) (22,262) $ 18,658,132 $ 16,792,519 $ 3,697 $ 3,697 2,429,442 $ 2,420,447 - 8,995 - Agenda Item: $ $ $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount 82 2,600,000 200,000 239,125 125,000 122,252 70,000 64,070 (1,000,000) 8,995 $ - $ - 4,106,659 80,729 4,025,930 $ 21,091,271 $ 13.0% 20,899,178 24.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the SE Regional and Perry Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Donation Technology Projects POLARIS Integrated Health System Polaris System for City of Scottsdale Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment 3,400,000 $ 3,604,810 $ 51,591 $ 39,922 7,500 4,169 450,000 $ 220,000 230,000 228,920 $ 228,920 51,591 39,922 7,500 4,169 228,920 228,920 $ 4,130,511 $ 3,885,321 $ (51,591) $ (39,922) (7,500) (4,169) (51,591) (39,922) (7,500) (4,169) (700,000) (450,000) $ (220,000) (230,000) (2,928,920) $ (228,920) (2,700,000) - (3,833,730) (228,920) (100,000) (3,504,810) Agenda Item: C-65-13-043-M-00 C-65-14-026-M-00 C-65-14-034-M-00 $ C-65-14-035-M-00 C-65-14-037-M-00 $ C-65-14-032-M-00 FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of the SE Regional and Perry Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Donation Information and Communications Technology Other IT Non Recurring Technology Projects POLARIS Integrated Health System Polaris System for City of Scottsdale Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment Other Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer $ Agenda Item: C-65-13-043-M-00 C-65-14-026-M-00 C-65-14-034-M-00 $ C-65-14-035-M-00 C-65-14-037-M-00 $ C-65-14-032-M-00 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ - $ - FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 147,915 $ 147,915 147,915 147,915 $ 4,663,011 $ 4,663,011 $ (147,915) $ (147,915) $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 932 $ 932 63,546 $ 63,546 64,478 64,478 $ 4,579,574 $ 1.4% 4,579,574 1.4% FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 343,555 $ - FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 343,555 $ - $ (343,555) $ (343,555) - FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ - $ - FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - Adjustments: Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment Agenda Item: C-65-14-032-M-00 FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Library District Budget Amendment Agenda Item: C-65-14-032-M-00 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec (147,915) (147,915) Agenda Item: $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount NON RECURRING NON PROJECT Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Agenda Item: Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 3,161,255 $ - FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 3,161,255 $ - $ (3,161,255) $ (3,161,255) - $ - $ - $ - $ - 6,000 6,000 $ - $ 6,000 Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ (900,000) $ (900,000) FY 2014 Revised Budget $ (900,000) $ (900,000) FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ (900,000) $ (900,000) $ 455,650 $ 455,650 455,650 455,650 $ (444,350) $ -50.6% (444,350) -50.6% FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) FY 2014 Revised Budget $ (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) $ 3,504,810 $ 3,504,810 3,504,810 3,504,810 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ - $ - FY 2015 Adopted Budget $ - $ - Adjustments: Base Adjustments Operating Fund Transfers Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount NON RECURRING NON PROJECT Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Agenda Item: 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Library District 86 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion 1) Adopt the Stadium District Fiscal Year 2015 Budget in the amount of $8,689,186 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Stadium District listed in the attached schedules. This amount represents no change from the Fiscal Year 2015 Tentative Budget of $8,689,186. 2) Approve the attached Executive Summary. 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2015 Adopted Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guidelines to conform with the budget. 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Denny Barney, Chairman, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Clint Hickman, District 4 Marie Lopez Rogers, District 5 The Stadium District’s recommended expenditure budget for FY 2015 is $8,689,186 and the recommended revenue budget is $10,458,111. Chase Field is now entering its 17th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility, the District completed Phase III of the Concrete and Structural Repair project in FY 2014. The Concrete and Structural project is projected to be an ongoing, multi-year effort based on objective findings from the Facility Assessment Study (conducted every two years) and annual observation and investigation. On August 1, 2012, the District issued Revenue 5,200,000 Refunding Bonds, Series 5,100,000 2012 in the amount of 5,000,000 $25,140,000 (par value) with 4,900,000 an interest rate of 2.28%. 4,800,000 The net proceeds, along 4,700,000 with $6,239,304 of the fund 4,600,000 balance, was used to 4,500,000 advance refund of the 4,400,000 Revenue Refunding Bonds, FY12 Actual FY14 Forecast FY11 Actual FY13 Actual FY15 Recommended Series 2002. This action effectively bought down the debt and allowed for a lower interest rate and lower annual debt service payments. As a result of the reduction in principal and interest payments, it is expected that excess car rental surcharge revenue will be available to remit to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) in FY 2015. Revenue $$ Car Rental Surcharge Revenue I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 23, 2014, the Maricopa County Stadium District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2015 Stadium District Budget totaling $8,689,186. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. 89 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Evening baseball game at Chase Field Center 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Carmine L. Davis, Management and Budget Supervisor Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 2017, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 5% from 80% to 85% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: 83% of routine items will be completed on schedule. It is anticipated that 84% of preventative maintenance items will be completed on time in FY 2015. Department Specific By June 2017, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 3% from 168 to 173 non-baseball events. Status: There were 191 non-baseball events held at the ballpark during FY 2013. This represented a 59% increase over the baseline amount of 113 non-baseball events. It is anticipated that the number of non-baseball events for the next fiscal year will be 191 or greater. Department Specific By June 2017, the District will increase facility revenue from $600,000 to $630,000 by 5% for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: Revenue for District events are scheduled to increase to $650,000 in FY 2015. 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE DEBT SERVICE $ 11,337,540 $ 4,352,706 GENERAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS $ - $ - $ 121,275 $ 4,875,667 $ 3,422,385 1,254,260 34,000 324 1,175,613 6,007,533 $ 4,875,991 $ - 6,007,533 7,112,947 INTERNAL SERVICE $ SUBTOTAL - $ 22,803,193 ELIMINATIONS $ - TOTAL $ 22,803,193 100 $ 100 750,000 1,385,778 2,135,978 $ - $ - $ 4,997,042 $ 3,422,385 1,254,260 34,424 750,000 2,561,391 13,019,502 $ - $ (2,561,391) (2,561,391) $ 4,997,042 3,422,385 1,254,260 34,424 750,000 10,458,111 2,135,978 - 13,019,502 $ (2,561,391) $ 10,458,111 - $ (2,561,391) (2,561,391) $ 402,759 2,160 2,594,970 3,689,297 6,689,186 NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING $ PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ - $ - $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES $ TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ - $ - $ $ 4,875,991 $ - $ 402,759 $ 2,160 11,250 2,580,720 3,689,128 169 1,175,613 1,385,778 4,371,586 $ 4,875,991 $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ 3,000 3,000 $ - $ - $ 402,759 $ 2,160 2,594,970 3,689,297 2,561,391 9,250,577 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ TOTAL USES $ - $ 4,371,586 $ 4,875,991 $ 2,003,000 $ - $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ - $ 1,635,947 $ - $ 2,132,978 $ - $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - $ 12,973,487 $ 4,352,706 $ 7,245,925 $ - $ 92 11,250,577 $ 3,768,925 $ 24,572,118 $ - $ $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 (2,561,391) $ 8,689,186 - $ 3,768,925 - $ 24,572,118 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2014 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT BALLPARK CONCOURSE FLR RESURF BLPRK LOUNGE AND RSTRM REN BALLPARK SUITE RENOVATION All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT FY 2014 REVISED FY 2015 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 1,272,788 $ 1,639,064 $ 1,274,756 $ 364,308 $ 3,948,367 $ 4,006,324 $ 3,096,830 $ 5,706,856 $ 3,948,367 $ 9,713,180 $ 3,096,830 $ 909,494 5,706,856 6,616,350 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,564,078 5,706,856 $ 6,197,802 $ 12,270,934 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 1,688,087 5,706,856 7,394,943 $ $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,003,000 $ 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000 $ 3,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 $ 3,503,000 $ 3,503,000 $ $ (3,590,259) $ (3,956,535) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,395,144) (5,706,856) (5,706,856) $ (3,590,259) $ (9,663,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (7,102,000) $ 11,331,698 $ 17,462,787 93 $ 8,689,186 $ 8,773,601 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2013 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES $ FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ 31,127,812 $ 5,193,014 36,320,826 $ 4,997,542 $ 5,279,750 10,277,292 $ 4,997,542 $ 5,337,707 10,335,249 $ 4,985,202 $ 5,385,712 10,370,914 $ 4,997,238 $ 5,426,745 10,423,983 $ (304) 89,038 88,734 0.0% 1.7% 0.9% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 63,535 $ 57,576 $ 57,576 $ 36,608 $ 34,128 $ (23,448) -40.7% $ 63,535 $ 57,576 $ 57,576 $ 36,608 $ 34,128 $ (23,448) -40.7% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 36,384,361 $ 10,334,868 $ 10,392,825 $ 10,407,522 $ 10,458,111 $ 65,286 0.6% $ 35,267,394 $ 4,070,471 39,337,865 $ 4,974,708 $ 6,071,126 11,045,834 $ 5,340,984 $ 11,825,404 17,166,388 $ 4,963,832 $ 10,503,471 15,467,303 $ 4,971,521 $ 3,426,793 8,398,314 $ 369,463 8,398,611 8,768,074 6.9% 71.0% 51.1% 59,127 $ 49,898 142,380 251,405 $ 56,483 $ 54,068 125,336 235,887 $ 58,981 $ 55,933 131,135 246,049 $ 63,959 $ 56,118 131,562 251,639 $ 63,040 $ 53,770 78,336 6,240 44,390 245,776 $ (4,059) 2,163 52,799 (6,240) (44,390) 273 -6.9% 3.9% 40.3% N/A N/A 0.1% 49,326 $ 651 49,977 $ 49,326 $ 1,024 50,350 $ 49,326 $ 868 50,194 $ 36,293 $ 1,977 996 39,266 $ 13,033 (1,977) 1,024 (996) 11,084 26.4% N/A 100.0% N/A 22.0% (5,830) (5,830) N/A N/A 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ BDFS - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT SPPT - OPERATIONS SUPPORT 99AS - INDIRECT SUPPORT $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC INFR - INFRASTRUCTURE ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES RISK - RISK PREMIUMS 99GV - GENERAL OVERHEAD $ $ 36,762 $ 648 37,410 $ TSPT - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,830 $ 5,830 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 39,626,680 $ 11,331,698 $ 17,462,787 $ 15,769,136 $ 8,689,186 $ $ 95 8,773,601 50.2% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2013 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2014 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % SUBTOTAL $ 5,217,453 5,217,453 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 4,984,851 4,984,851 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,268,680 3,268,680 $ $ 3,384,928 3,384,928 $ $ 3,384,928 3,384,928 $ $ 3,390,868 3,390,868 $ $ 3,422,385 3,422,385 $ $ 37,457 37,457 1.1% 1.1% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ 1,274 1,115,282 1,116,556 $ - $ 1,144,722 1,144,722 $ 1,202,679 1,202,679 $ 1,205,211 1,205,211 $ $ $ 1,254,260 1,254,260 51,581 51,581 N/A 4.3% 4.3% 36,992 $ 789,600 826,592 $ 34,424 750,000 784,424 $ $ (23,752) (23,752) LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ 145,655 $ 1,496,017 1,641,672 $ 58,176 750,000 808,176 $ $ $ 58,176 $ 750,000 808,176 $ $ -40.8% 0.0% -2.9% ALL REVENUES $ 11,244,361 $ 10,334,868 $ 10,392,825 $ 10,407,522 $ 10,458,111 $ 65,286 0.6% OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0652 - PROCEEEDS FROM FINANCING $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 25,140,000 25,140,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - N/A N/A 36,384,361 FY 2013 ACTUAL $ 10,334,868 $ FY 2014 ADOPTED 10,392,825 FY 2014 REVISED $ 10,407,522 FY 2014 FORECAST $ 10,458,111 FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 65,286 0.6% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % TOTAL SOURCES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 277,400 $ 4,909 90,451 8,886 (30,712) 36,034 386,968 $ 268,455 $ 9,084 4,000 89,565 (11,867) 15,000 374,237 $ 283,129 $ 9,084 4,000 91,982 (12,478) 15,611 391,328 $ 288,199 $ 3,969 4,452 92,142 (12,478) 13,981 390,265 $ 282,444 $ 9,773 5,000 92,251 9,642 (12,497) 16,146 402,759 $ 685 (689) (1,000) (269) (9,642) 19 (535) (11,431) 0.2% -7.6% -25.0% -0.3% N/A 0.2% -3.4% -2.9% 1,951 $ 124 2,075 $ 2,180 $ 50 2,230 $ 2,180 $ 50 2,230 $ 1,833 $ 37 1,870 $ 2,100 $ 60 2,160 $ 80 (10) 70 3.7% -20.0% 3.1% 22,844 $ 1,142,486 989,164 425,897 2,358 1,178 134 80 270 2,584,411 $ 75,298 $ 1,974,855 1,000 496,611 3,500,000 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,088 6,063,353 $ 75,298 $ 2,323,667 3,501,000 554,941 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,088 6,470,495 $ 66,490 $ 1,883,982 3,500,500 514,571 (1) 7,139 3,804 136 386 1,208 5,978,215 $ 75,298 $ 1,956,355 3,000 2,001,000 542,864 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,952 4,594,970 $ 367,312 (3,000) 1,500,000 12,077 (864) 1,875,525 0.0% 15.8% N/A 42.8% 2.2% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -79.4% 29.0% $ 896,157 $ 35,756,964 105 36,653,226 $ - $ 4,891,632 246 4,891,878 $ - $ 10,598,488 246 10,598,734 $ - $ 9,398,489 297 9,398,786 $ - $ 3,689,128 169 3,689,297 $ 6,909,360 77 6,909,437 N/A 65.2% 31.3% 65.2% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 39,626,680 $ 11,331,698 $ 17,462,787 $ 15,769,136 $ 8,689,186 $ 8,773,601 50.2% TOTAL USES $ 39,626,680 $ 11,331,698 $ 17,462,787 $ 15,769,136 $ 8,689,186 $ 8,773,601 50.2% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 96 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED % VAR -21.7% N/A -21.7% SOURCES $ 659,175 $ 688,388 1,347,563 $ 1,308,920 $ 1,308,920 $ 1,675,196 $ 1,675,196 $ 1,310,256 $ 1,310,256 $ 1,310,888 $ 1,310,888 $ (364,308) (364,308) $ SOURCES $ 4,435,368 $ 4,435,368 $ 4,572,866 $ 4,572,866 $ 4,630,823 $ 4,630,823 $ 4,617,251 $ 4,617,251 $ 4,696,645 $ 4,696,645 $ 65,822 65,822 $ SOURCES $ 6,504,921 $ 25,140,000 31,644,921 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ 5,706,856 11,904,658 $ 4,985,202 $ 5,706,857 10,692,059 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ $ SOURCES $ 1,789,171 $ 1,789,171 $ 1,845,539 $ 1,845,539 $ 1,845,539 $ 1,845,539 $ 1,781,470 $ 1,781,470 $ 2,135,978 $ 2,135,978 $ 290,439 290,439 15.7% 15.7% $ SOURCES $ (2,832,662) $ (2,832,662) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,956,535) $ (5,706,856) (9,663,391) $ (2,286,657) $ (5,706,857) (7,993,514) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ 1,395,144 5,706,856 7,102,000 -35.3% -100.0% -73.5% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,555,973 $ 25,828,388 $ 36,384,361 $ 10,334,868 $ - $ 10,334,868 $ 10,392,825 $ - $ 10,392,825 $ 10,407,522 $ - $ 10,407,522 $ 10,458,111 $ - $ 10,458,111 $ 65,286 65,286 0.6% N/A 0.6% FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING $ FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED 1.4% 1.4% (1,321,811) -21.3% (5,706,856) -100.0% (7,028,667) -59.0% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 583,852 $ 583,852 $ 1,272,788 $ 1,272,788 $ 1,639,064 $ 1,639,064 $ 1,267,045 $ 1,267,045 $ 1,274,756 $ 1,274,756 $ 364,308 364,308 22.2% 22.2% $ 3,438,828 $ 3,438,828 $ 3,948,367 $ 3,948,367 $ 4,006,324 $ 5,706,856 9,713,180 $ 2,586,722 $ 5,706,857 8,293,579 $ 3,096,830 $ 3,096,830 $ 909,494 5,706,856 6,616,350 22.7% 100.0% 68.1% 5,017,922 $ 31,511,982 36,529,904 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,564,078 $ 5,706,856 12,270,934 $ 4,992,669 $ 5,706,857 10,699,526 $ 4,875,991 $ 4,875,991 $ 1,688,087 5,706,856 7,394,943 25.7% 100.0% 60.3% 2,500 $ 1,904,258 1,906,758 $ 3,000 $ 3,500,000 3,503,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,500,000 3,503,000 $ 2,500 $ 3,500,000 3,502,500 $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 2,003,000 $ 1,500,000 1,500,000 0.0% 42.9% 42.8% FUND TOTAL USES $ (2,832,662) $ (2,832,662) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,956,535) $ (5,706,856) (9,663,391) $ (2,286,657) $ (5,706,857) (7,993,514) $ (2,561,391) $ (2,561,391) $ (1,395,144) (5,706,856) (7,102,000) 35.3% 100.0% 73.5% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 6,210,440 $ 33,416,240 $ 39,626,680 $ 7,831,698 $ 3,500,000 $ 11,331,698 $ 8,255,931 $ 9,206,856 $ 17,462,787 $ 6,562,279 $ 9,206,857 $ 15,769,136 $ 6,689,186 $ 2,000,000 $ 8,689,186 $ 1,566,745 7,206,856 8,773,601 19.0% 78.3% 50.2% 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL USES $ 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Operating $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Operating $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 $ 1,200,000 $ 6,906,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - Operating $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - 1,033,926 1,033,926 1,033,926 1,033,926 106,518 106,518 106,518 106,518 DEBT SERVICE Animal Control License Shelter (572) - Debt Service Animal Control Field Operations (574) - Debt Service 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 $ 1,200,000 $ 6,906,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - Operating $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - $ 1,095,339 $ 1,095,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 Operating $ 1,095,339 $ 1,095,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 1,095,339 $ 1,095,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 Operating $ 1,095,339 $ 1,095,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 $ 3,590,259 $ 9,663,391 $ 7,993,514 $ 2,561,391 Operating $ 3,590,259 $ 3,956,535 $ 2,286,657 $ 2,561,391 Non-Recurring $ - $ 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (3,590,259) $ (9,663,391) $ (7,993,514) $ (2,561,391) Operating $ (3,590,259) $ (3,956,535) $ (2,286,657) $ (2,561,391) Non-Recurring $ - $ (5,706,856) $ (5,706,857) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 6,698,594 $ 1,385,778 2,295,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - 2,295,339 $ 8,002,195 $ 6,698,594 $ 1,385,778 2,295,339 $ 2,295,339 $ 991,737 $ 1,385,778 $ - $ 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Operating $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 Operating $ 1,294,920 $ 1,661,196 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,175,613 $ 3,590,259 $ 9,663,391 $ 7,993,514 $ 2,561,391 Operating $ 3,590,259 $ 3,956,535 $ 2,286,657 $ 2,561,391 Non-Recurring $ - $ 5,706,856 $ 5,706,857 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (3,590,259) $ (9,663,391) $ (7,993,514) $ (2,561,391) Operating $ (3,590,259) $ (3,956,535) $ (2,286,657) $ (2,561,391) Non-Recurring $ - $ (5,706,856) $ (5,706,857) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,295,339 $ 8,002,195 $ Operating $ 2,295,339 $ Non-Recurring $ - $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ Operating $ Non-Recurring DEBT SERVICE OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM ACTIVITY INDIRECT SUPPORT BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROCUREMENT PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .85 1.10 .60 2.55 .85 1.15 .60 2.60 .85 1.15 .60 .00 .00 2.60 .85 1.15 .60 2.60 .80 .50 .55 .70 .10 2.65 (.05) (.65) (.05) .70 .10 .05 (5.9%) (56.5%) (8.3%) N/A N/A 1.9% 2.45 2.45 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.35 2.35 5.00 (.05) (.05) - (2.1%) (2.1%) 0.0% 99 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Executive Assistant Office Assistant Director - Stadium District Finance/Business Analyst Facil Capital Project Mgr Department Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% General Adjustments FY 2015 personnel expenditures increased due to the annualization of County performance pay and market study adjustments in FY 2014. Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating • Increase Regular Benefits by $167 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Decrease Internal Service Charges by $28 for the impact of changes in risk management charges. • Increase expenditures by $9,642 for the impact of Other Personal Services. Eliminations Fund (900) Operating • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $1,028,868 to eliminate transfers between Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year. FY 2013 ACTUAL 78.6% FY 2014 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST 82.4% 66.2% FY 2015 ADOPTED 82.7% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.3% 0.4% 97.7% 97.7% 90.8% 90.8% (6.8%) -7.0% 16.6% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” Measure Type Result Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue FY 2015 Measure FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 REV VS ADOPTED VAR % ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST Description ACTUAL 0.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% Percent change in economic benefit from 16.6% 5.0% Cactus League over prior year. 0.0% 10 10 10 Number of existing spring training facilities in 10 Maricopa County for the current Fiscal Year. 0.0% 10 10 10 Number of existing and planned spring training 10 facilities for the current Fiscal Year. 6.9% Cost per existing spring training facility in $3,526,739.40 $ 534,098.40 $ 496,383.20 $ 497,152.10 $ 36,946.30 Maricopa County for the current fiscal year. 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 1,328,610 $ 30,444,921 (645,719) 31,127,812 $ 1,661,196 $ 4,997,542 (1,661,196) 4,997,542 $ 1,294,920 $ 4,985,202 (1,294,920) 4,985,202 $ 1,296,888 $ 4,875,963 (1,175,613) 4,997,238 $ (364,308) (121,579) 485,583 (304) -21.9% -2.4% -29.2% -0.0% 583,209 $ 35,329,904 (645,719) 35,267,394 $ 1,638,102 $ 5,364,078 (1,661,196) 5,340,984 $ 1,266,083 $ 4,992,669 (1,294,920) 4,963,832 $ 1,271,143 $ 4,875,991 (1,175,613) 4,971,521 $ 366,959 488,087 (485,583) 369,463 22.4% 9.1% 29.2% 6.9% Expenditure 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ Activity Narrative: The annual cost per spring training facility declined in FY 2014 due to the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 in FY 2013. The reduction in debt service allowed for a payment of $1,539,421 to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement in FY 2014. Revenue collected for the Car Rental Surcharge is expected to decrease 2.5% from the FY 2014 Revised budget amount. This estimated decrease is based on historical results and conservative forecasting. Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Operating • Increase expenditures by $1,968 due to an increase in payment to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA). Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) Operating • Decrease revenue by $121,275 for the reduction in estimated Car Rental Surcharge in FY 2015. Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Mandates: Mandated by A.R.S 48-4204 which states, “From the taxes and surcharges levied pursuant to article 2 of this chapter for use with respect to major league baseball spring training, the district may acquire land and construct, finance, furnish, maintain, improve, operate, market and promote the use of existing or proposed major league baseball spring training facilities or stadiums and other structures, utilities, roads, parking areas or buildings necessary for full use of the training facilities or stadiums for sports and other purposes and do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish those purposes. The board shall require that any project undertaken by the district include financial participation from the county or municipality in which the project is located, from a private party or from any combination of these entities which equals or exceeds one-half of the amount to be expended or distributed by the district…” Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Expenditure Ratio Revenue Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year. Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year. Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year. Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year. $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ FY 2013 ACTUAL 78.6% FY 2014 REVISED 82.4% FY 2014 FORECAST 66.2% FY 2015 ADOPTED 82.7% 97.7% 97.7% 90.8% 90.8% 1,901 1,867 1,901 1,901 34 1.8% 2,462,793 2,175,539 1,669,337 2,409,142 233,603 10.7% 2,267,330 2,175,539 2,409,142 2,409,142 233,603 10.7% 4.01 73.8% 1.65 $ 4,390,920 $ 1,200,000 1,789,037 (2,186,943) 5,193,014 $ 5.44 $ 4,587,607 $ 6,906,856 1,845,439 (8,002,195) 5,337,707 $ 6.29 $ 1.42 REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.3% 0.4% (6.8%) $ -7.0% 4,596,079 $ 5,706,857 1,781,370 (6,698,594) 5,385,712 $ 4,676,645 $ 89,038 (6,906,856) 2,135,878 290,439 (1,385,778) 6,616,417 5,426,745 $ 89,038 1.9% -100.0% 15.7% -82.7% 1.7% 3,150,656 $ 9,417,743 $ 7,992,708 $ 1,200,000 6,906,856 5,706,857 3,503,000 3,502,500 1,906,758 (2,186,943) (8,002,195) (6,698,594) 4,070,471 $ 11,825,404 $ 10,503,471 $ 2,809,571 $ 6,608,172 6,906,856 2,003,000 1,500,000 (1,385,778) (6,616,417) 3,426,793 $ 8,398,611 70.2% 100.0% 42.8% 82.7% 71.0% Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: It is estimated that there will be a slight increase in routine maintenance items completed on time. The number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year is expected to increase in FY 2015. However, customer satisfaction is down due to results from a customer satisfaction survey conducted jointly by Maricopa County and the Diamondbacks. Increase in revenue results from agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks and an increase of one half the net of FY 2015 revenue. The District is working with the Arizona Diamondbacks to determine an amount for nonrecurring major maintenance or capital projects. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating • Increase revenue by $51,581 for Stadium District rental fees. • Increase revenue by $37,457 for Ballpark license permits fees. • Decrease Interest Revenue by $23,216 due to reduction in budgeted interest earnings for FY 2015. • Decrease Transfer Out by $919,275 based on existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels to be transferred to Long Term Project Reserve (F450). Stadium District Debt Service (370) Operating • Decrease Interest Earnings Revenue by $536 in FY 2015. 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget • • • Stadium District Decrease revenue by $121,275 for the reduction in estimated Car Rental Surcharge in FY 2015. Decrease expenditures by $1,321,811 due to a reduction in principal payments from the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. Decrease Transfer Out by $1,200,000 to Cactus League Operations (Fund 250) for payment to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA). Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non-Recurring • Increase Transfer In by $290,439 based on the existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels to be transferred to Ballpark Operations Fund (253). Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle, licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Stadium District Car Rental Surcharge Fiscal Annual Growth Year Collections Rate 7.9% 6,498,814 2005-06 -3.2% 6,288,093 2006-07 -2.5% 6,132,645 2007-08 -13.5% 5,304,567 2008-09 -12.0% 4,668,575 2009-10 6.8% 4,988,266 2010-11 4.1% 5,191,682 2011-12 0.5% 5,217,412 2012-13 -3.3% 5,043,631 2013-14* -3.3% 4,875,667 2014-15** * Forecasted ** Budgeted Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies Miscellaneous Revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of Miscellaneous Revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources are solely comprised by Fund Transfers In. 103 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds are utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from the Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) will be made for repayment of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the reduction in debt service payment will allow for a payment of $1,175,989 to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2015. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 3,666,764 $ 4,386,880 $ 4,386,880 $ 4,430,470 $ 4,473,681 $ $ $ $ 1,310,256 1,310,256 $ $ 1,675,196 1,675,196 $ $ 1,308,920 1,308,920 $ 1,310,888 1,310,888 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 659,175 688,388 1,347,563 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 583,852 583,852 $ $ 1,272,788 1,272,788 $ $ 1,639,064 1,639,064 $ $ 1,267,045 1,267,045 $ $ 1,274,756 1,274,756 Structural Balance $ 75,323 $ 36,132 $ 36,132 $ 43,211 $ 36,132 Accounting Adjustments $ (5) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 4,423,012 4,423,012 $ $ 4,423,012 4,423,012 $ $ 4,473,681 4,473,681 $ $ 4,509,813 4,509,813 4,430,470 4,430,470 $ $ 104 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2014 REVISED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 9,543,659 $ 10,285,906 $ 10,285,906 $ 10,540,187 $ 6,863,859 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,435,368 4,435,368 $ $ 4,572,866 4,572,866 $ $ 4,630,823 4,630,823 $ $ 4,617,251 4,617,251 $ $ 4,696,645 4,696,645 $ $ $ 2,586,722 5,706,857 8,293,579 $ $ 4,006,324 5,706,856 9,713,180 $ $ 3,948,367 3,948,367 $ $ 3,438,828 3,438,828 $ 3,096,830 3,096,830 Structural Balance $ 996,540 $ 624,499 $ 624,499 $ 2,030,529 $ 1,599,815 Accounting Adjustments $ (12) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ 10,910,405 10,910,405 $ $ 5,203,549 5,203,549 $ $ 6,863,859 6,863,859 $ $ 8,463,674 8,463,674 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 10,540,187 10,540,187 Stadium District Debt Service (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2014 REVISED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2015 ADOPTED $ 9,245,158 $ 3,800,218 $ 3,800,218 $ 4,360,173 $ 4,352,706 $ 6,504,921 25,140,000 31,644,921 $ 6,197,802 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 5,706,856 11,904,658 $ 4,985,202 5,706,857 10,692,059 $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 $ 6,564,078 5,706,856 12,270,934 $ 4,992,669 5,706,857 10,699,526 $ $ 6,197,802 6,197,802 $ $ 5,017,922 31,511,982 36,529,904 Structural Balance $ 1,486,999 $ - $ Accounting Adjustments $ (2) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 3,800,218 3,800,218 $ $ 3,433,942 3,433,942 $ $ 4,352,706 4,352,706 $ $ 4,352,706 4,352,706 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ 4,360,173 4,360,173 $ $ $ 105 $ $ $ $ (366,276) $ $ $ 4,875,991 4,875,991 (7,467) $ - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2013 ACTUAL FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2015 ADOPTED FY 2014 FORECAST FY 2014 REVISED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 8,951,563 $ 8,843,600 $ 8,843,600 $ 8,833,977 $ 7,112,947 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 1,789,171 1,789,171 $ $ 1,845,539 1,845,539 $ $ 1,845,539 1,845,539 $ $ 1,781,470 1,781,470 $ $ 2,135,978 2,135,978 $ $ $ 2,500 3,500,000 3,502,500 $ $ 3,000 3,500,000 3,503,000 $ $ 3,000 3,500,000 3,503,000 $ $ 2,500 1,904,258 1,906,758 $ 3,000 2,000,000 2,003,000 Structural Balance $ 1,786,671 $ 1,842,539 $ 1,842,539 $ 1,778,970 $ 2,132,978 Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 8,833,977 8,833,977 $ $ 7,186,139 7,186,139 $ $ 7,186,139 7,186,139 $ $ 7,112,947 7,112,947 $ $ 7,245,925 7,245,925 Expenditures Revenue Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment 1,308,920 $ 366,276 $ 366,276 366,276 366,276 $ 1,639,064 $ 1,675,196 $ (366,276) $ (366,276) $ 1,272,788 $ 1,308,920 $ 1,968 $ 1,968 1,968 1,968 $ 1,274,756 $ 0.2% 1,310,888 0.2% C-68-14-009-M-11 Agenda Item: C-68-14-009-M-11 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA 1,272,788 $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment $ (366,276) (366,276) Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 3,948,367 $ 4,572,866 $ 57,957 $ 57,957 57,957 57,957 FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 4,006,324 $ 4,630,823 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ 4,006,324 $ 4,630,823 $ 167 $ 167 (909,661) $ 9,642 37,457 37,457 Adjustments: Non Recurring IGA for Law Enforcement Serives Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Revenue - Ballpark License Permit Fees Expenditures - Other Personal Services Internal Service Charges Risk Management Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res General Revenues Interest Revenue Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA Revenue - Stadium Rentals Fee Agenda Item: C-68-14-002-M-00 Agenda Item: $ $ $ 37,457 9,642 (28) $ - (28) $ $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount (919,275) - $ - (23,216) (23,216) $ - $ - 51,581 51,581 $ 3,096,830 $ -22.7% 4,696,645 1.4% 51,581 Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment 6,197,802 $ 366,276 $ 366,276 - $ 6,564,078 $ 6,197,802 $ (366,276) $ (366,276) - $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ (1,321,811) $ (1,321,811) - $ - (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (121,811) (121,275) (536) 4,875,991 $ -21.3% 4,875,991 -21.3% C-68-14-009-M-11 Agenda Item: C-68-14-009-M-11 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Base Adjustments Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service General Revenues Car Rental Surcharge Interest Revenue 6,197,802 $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment $ Agenda Item: $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount $ 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,845,539 FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,845,539 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold $ 3,000 $ 1,845,539 $ - $ - 290,439 290,439 $ 3,000 $ 0.0% 2,135,978 15.7% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 3,500,000 $ - FY 2014 Revised Budget $ 3,500,000 $ - $ (3,500,000) $ (3,500,000) - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 - $ 2,000,000 $ - Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Agenda Item: FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non Recurring Chase Field Concrete Repairs Agenda Item: $ FY 2015 Adopted Budget 2,000,000 Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2014 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment (3,590,259) $ (366,276) $ (366,276) (366,276) (366,276) $ (3,956,535) $ (3,956,535) $ 366,276 $ 366,276 $ (3,590,259) $ (3,590,259) $ 1,028,868 $ 1,028,868 1,028,868 1,028,868 $ (2,561,391) $ -28.7% (2,561,391) -28.7% C-68-14-009-M-11 Agenda Item: C-68-14-009-M-11 FY 2015 Baseline Budget Threshold Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service (3,590,259) $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Debt Service Fund Budget Adjustment $ 366,276 366,276 Agenda Item: FY 2015 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Threshold Amount 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a Major League Baseball stadium, and; • Enhance and promote Major League Baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of existing, baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2013 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. During the year ending June 30, 2013, the Stadium District issued $25,100,000 in revenue refunding bonds with an average interest rate of 2.28 percent and contributed $8,895,485 to advance refund the outstanding Revenue Refunding Bonds ($30,945,000). As a result, the refunded bonds are considered defeased. The obligations are generally non-callable, with interest payable semi-annually. The securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the refunded bonds. The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. 109 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2013 Year Ending Total June 30 2014 Principal $ 3,180,000 Interest $ 511,632 Debt Service $ 3,691,632 2015 3,250,000 439,128 3,689,128 2016 3,325,000 365,028 3,690,028 2017 3,405,000 289,218 3,694,218 2018 3,480,000 211,584 3,691,584 2019 5,800,000 132,240 5,932,240 Total $ 22,440,000 $ 1,948,830 $ 24,388,830 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 Interest Principal Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. 110 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District Examples of the rating systems are: RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Premium quality High quality Medium quality AAA AA A Aaa Aa A AAA AA A Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade BBB BB B Baa Ba B BBB BB B Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest CCC CC C Caa Ca C CCC CC C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DD D DDD DD D Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Moody's Standard & Poor's BBB- (1) WR (2) AAA (3) (1) Bonds are insured, underlying rating. (2) Withdrawn (3) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating Stadium District Loans Payable On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Professional Baseball Team Limited Partnership (Team) for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over nine (9) years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2017. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten (10) years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2013 Year Ending June 30 2014 Principal $ 1,200,000 2015 1,200,000 2016 1,200,000 2017 1,200,000 2018 473,928 2019-21 432,929 Total $ 112 5,706,857 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2015 Tentative Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2015 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 113 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts DIST. NO. DISTRICT NAME K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv LEVY PURPOSE Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ FY 2015 LESS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT BUDGET FY 2014 REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT 296 $ 296 $ 215 $ FY 2015 - $ 215 1,517 1,517 1,472 - 1,472 1,813 $ 1,813 $ 1,687 $ - $ 1,687 - $ - $ - 6,006 240 $ 6,006 240 $ - - - 6,246 $ 6,246 $ - $ - $ - 4,087 $ 4,087 $ 2,919 2,919 11,191 - 11,191 7,007 $ 7,007 $ 15,045 $ - $ 15,045 13,800 $ - $ 3,854 General General 100,000 100,000 100,000 28793 Queen Creek Water Improv General 10,900 10,900 6,281 6,281 Subtotal $ 130,981 $ 130,981 $ 130,548 $ - $ 130,548 Total $ 146,047 $ 146,047 $ 147,280 $ - $ 147,280 114 13,800 $ - $ 28529 Estrella Dells General 13,800 $ 3,854 $ 28795 Circle City Community Park 28835 20th Street $ ESTIMATED FY 2014 13,800 - 100,000 10,900 - 10,900 5,848 - 5,848 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District MARICOPA COUNTY STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2015 FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Tow ne Meadow s The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadow s 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadow s 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B 3,642 3,950 12,305 1,514 9,013 13,554 1,122 23,738 3,485 6,056 8,132 7,424 303 1,377 5,335 7,379 3,028 12,788 4,905 5,550 7,822 4,171 6,141 908 691 10,608 2,293 15,912 1,192 8,030 722 10,887 8,933 13,604 19,447 1,954 2,682 14,926 4,542 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 3,609 3,911 12,192 1,500 8,930 13,430 600 23,508 3,452 6,000 8,058 7,347 300 1,364 5,286 7,312 3,000 12,671 4,860 5,494 7,758 4,132 6,084 900 600 10,509 2,274 15,763 1,180 7,955 1,200 10,786 8,850 13,477 19,266 1,936 2,657 14,776 4,501 115 Estimated TAX LEVY 60 4,580 15,042 1,813 703 16,861 35 29,197 3,911 6,213 8,830 7,673 399 1,557 6,570 9,186 2,960 15,136 5,447 6,479 9,640 5,291 6,748 1,038 24 11,838 2,657 17,787 1,285 8,655 1,200 11,924 10,135 15,171 21,666 2,125 3,316 16,105 4,639 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 TAX NET ASSESSED VALUE RATE 604,068 0.0099 1,167,050 0.3924 1,907,417 0.7886 223,330 0.8118 7,027,928 0.0100 1,832,260 0.9202 353,290 0.0099 1,947,805 1.4990 760,868 0.5140 2,319,361 0.2679 1,083,749 0.8148 1,776,030 0.4320 1,754,562 0.0227 598,112 0.2603 1,521,300 0.4319 1,638,096 0.5608 574,535 0.5152 2,279,278 0.6641 1,074,356 0.5070 865,830 0.7483 988,548 0.9752 459,051 1.1526 3,580,244 0.1885 763,058 0.1360 237,100 0.0101 3,692,178 0.3206 138,487 1.9186 5,362,706 0.3317 368,130 0.3491 2,559,162 0.3382 113,480 1.0575 2,967,062 0.4019 2,455,518 0.4127 3,682,405 0.4120 4,366,969 0.4961 1,183,636 0.1795 242,180 1.3692 1,624,834 0.9912 913,857 0.5076 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 2,820 4,815 5,276 32,449 1,514 1,772 8,375 5,092 1,039,886 15,633 3,028 3,331 260 3,936 25,607 3,094 7,412 5,661 20,302 13,563 3,634 2,751 4,243 2,384 29,501 3,864 29,656 32,065 3,634 6,056 3,934 3,576 8,960 17,579 14,280 23,710 10,037 6,496 20,133 18,798 12,643 180,749 6,383 15,389 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 2,793 4,770 5,226 32,117 1,500 1,756 8,297 5,043 1,020,284 15,487 3,000 3,300 258 3,900 25,344 3,065 7,343 5,609 20,093 13,424 3,601 2,725 4,202 2,362 29,193 3,824 29,385 31,738 3,601 6,000 3,895 3,542 8,877 17,415 14,147 23,472 9,944 6,433 19,928 18,606 12,515 178,904 6,318 15,242 116 Estimated TAX LEVY 3,088 5,219 6,570 33,867 1,935 2,180 9,407 5,364 1,084,115 17,295 3,764 4,096 128 3,966 26,599 3,689 8,187 7,125 21,241 14,466 4,399 3,063 4,637 2,985 31,110 3,865 30,469 33,439 4,148 6,999 3,723 3,781 9,999 19,471 15,735 27,520 12,696 6,791 20,952 19,205 12,954 183,510 7,185 16,049 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 TAX NET ASSESSED VALUE RATE 524,384 0.5889 688,351 0.7582 562,026 1.1690 3,154,861 1.0735 0.7897 245,040 0.8484 256,940 0.3533 2,662,607 1.6533 324,438 0.5521 196,373,412 0.4735 3,652,344 1.1821 318,409 0.6464 633,622 0.0649 197,075 0.3947 1,004,716 2,588,714 1.0275 1.5699 234,990 452,030 1.8112 1.6079 443,117 2,311,498 0.9189 1,617,491 0.8943 0.8832 498,100 1.8775 163,145 432,678 1.0717 366,590 0.8143 1.0262 3,031,533 288,952 1.3376 0.8487 3,590,116 3,534,557 0.9461 750,477 0.5527 864,054 0.8100 1.3660 272,550 568,368 0.6652 2,600,848 0.3845 3,285,445 0.5926 3,013,800 0.5221 3,604,145 0.7636 1,119,944 1.1336 531,161 1.2785 2,208,622 0.9486 2,438,038 0.7877 1,578,687 0.8206 34,983,969 0.5246 1,267,840 0.5667 1,518,763 1.0567 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 DESCRIPTION Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentw ood Acres 44,388 27,522 27,869 3,051 6,409 32,644 842 13,283 1,230 4,469 39,914 5,661 3,608 1,490 2,086 5,473 5,251 8,939 9,435 1,264 5,528 27,390 25,790 8,386 2,384 21,012 6,056 1,514 9,204 2,423 15,192 4,724 4,613 4,071 11,419 2,466 10,152 14,440 1,230 26,781 36,986 14,681 8,616 656 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 43,935 27,242 27,586 3,023 6,344 32,309 834 13,149 1,218 4,428 39,500 5,609 3,572 1,476 2,066 5,423 5,201 8,855 9,347 1,252 5,470 27,112 25,524 8,302 2,362 20,819 6,000 1,500 9,120 2,401 15,051 4,680 4,570 4,034 11,308 2,444 10,058 14,305 1,218 26,501 36,600 14,535 8,531 650 117 Estimated TAX LEVY 45,701 29,015 28,197 3,785 6,469 32,910 174 14,051 74 4,900 42,012 6,141 3,726 1,596 2,453 6,650 5,799 9,740 10,445 1,554 5,619 29,310 26,801 9,562 2,476 21,970 6,940 1,472 11,048 2,887 17,194 5,260 5,334 4,572 11,905 2,718 12,367 15,704 69 29,985 39,122 17,569 9,118 30 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 6,737,651 0.6783 3,733,594 0.7771 3,315,146 0.8506 443,510 0.8534 763,328 0.8475 3,739,779 0.8800 1,741,562 0.0100 1,759,767 0.7985 737,030 0.0100 299,955 1.6336 4,387,299 0.9576 561,755 1.0932 465,480 0.8005 272,480 0.5857 200,716 1.2221 397,900 1.6713 565,875 1.0248 1,644,467 0.5923 1,655,803 0.6308 210,390 0.7386 749,446 0.7498 3,168,927 0.9249 2,960,871 0.9052 2,656,645 0.3599 338,382 0.7317 5,694,030 0.3858 1,587,482 0.4372 265,696 0.5540 757,489 1.4585 260,220 1.1094 2,251,930 0.7635 727,078 0.7234 393,186 1.3566 495,176 0.9233 902,186 1.3196 456,874 0.5949 1,311,654 0.9429 2,328,323 0.6745 688,520 0.0100 3,162,127 0.9483 3,861,985 1.0130 2,793,630 0.6289 1,529,558 0.5961 299,490 0.0100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 DESCRIPTION Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Tow n & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 6,359 23,205 12,549 28,456 4,200 5,170 1,724 739 2,380 5,057 821 2,134 2,507 657 2,708 4,239 4,417 657 2,704 1,559 1,477 4,148 3,873 7,873 4,513 4,728 2,955 1,888 3,775 2,980 7,151 903 9,690 543 821 2,544 1,067 2,308 2,754 10,915 6,679 4,596 11,204 2,588 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 6,301 22,966 12,427 28,164 4,157 5,123 1,708 732 2,358 5,011 813 2,114 2,483 651 2,683 4,200 4,376 651 2,679 1,545 1,463 4,110 3,837 7,801 4,472 4,684 2,927 1,870 3,740 2,952 7,084 894 9,599 538 813 2,521 1,057 2,287 2,729 10,814 6,617 4,554 11,101 2,565 118 Estimated TAX LEVY 7,914 26,149 13,485 28,995 4,250 6,142 196 103 199 476 95 234 229 472 376 5,124 519 87 2,902 207 162 355 4,192 9,407 442 457 331 166 449 3,441 8,230 80 12,238 63 115 212 111 2,732 2,972 1,194 709 998 13,381 306 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 TAX NET ASSESSED VALUE RATE 891,821 0.8874 0.7705 3,393,632 1,219,298 1.1060 2,866,275 1.0116 1.2130 350,368 0.4510 1,361,977 0.0100 1,964,213 0.0100 1,033,930 1,991,932 0.0100 4,757,233 0.0100 0.0100 951,490 0.0100 2,344,306 0.0100 2,293,718 0.0100 4,716,280 0.0100 3,760,915 539,246 0.9502 5,188,477 0.0100 872,778 0.0100 0.8993 322,689 2,074,674 0.0100 1,617,709 0.0100 3,545,412 0.0100 0.3486 1,202,557 753,392 1.2486 4,419,172 0.0100 4,570,060 0.0100 0.0100 3,308,153 1,662,892 0.0100 4,493,154 0.0100 324,880 1.0592 0.9294 885,474 0.0100 796,341 2,038,982 0.6002 625,746 0.0101 0.0100 1,148,076 2,118,604 0.0100 1,112,794 0.0100 216,661 1.2610 0.6728 441,710 11,939,921 0.0100 7,085,396 0.0100 9,975,662 0.0100 0.5655 2,366,398 3,061,262 0.0100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 DESCRIPTION Merew ay Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 2,134 739 492 1,805 8,640 657 1,788 16,957 6,104 2,682 2,980 46,290 20,496 9,534 6,587 3,830 37,947 33,030 16,285 14,768 18,021 14,480 2,980 9,236 58,831 44,962 5,262 5,738 403,787 5,776 8,640 7,260 45,367 3,164 11,382 51,066 12,514 28,860 45,988 10,428 15,611 16,649 40,457 3,962 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 2,114 732 488 1,789 8,560 651 1,771 16,802 6,047 2,657 2,952 45,819 20,288 9,446 6,526 3,794 37,560 32,696 16,119 14,616 17,836 14,331 2,952 9,150 58,242 44,514 5,209 5,682 399,452 5,723 8,560 7,190 44,902 3,132 11,268 50,547 12,397 28,567 45,515 10,331 15,450 16,482 40,042 3,926 119 Estimated TAX LEVY 129 72 51 206 9,872 56 1,977 20,062 7,053 2,855 3,352 50,416 22,134 10,693 7,494 4,458 41,429 35,044 16,931 16,091 18,914 15,333 3,123 10,177 63,255 47,984 5,081 5,980 435,124 5,945 9,416 7,608 45,801 3,240 12,205 53,624 13,556 29,430 47,266 11,396 16,407 19,168 41,899 3,947 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 1,290,488 0.0100 722,260 0.0100 505,380 0.0101 2,057,258 0.0100 1,014,838 0.9728 560,680 0.0100 209,286 0.9446 3,531,014 0.5682 882,572 0.7991 260,755 1.0949 520,412 0.6441 4,323,973 1.1660 2,214,585 0.9995 1,281,526 0.8344 991,512 0.7558 302,850 1.4720 4,021,523 1.0302 3,064,969 1.1434 1,707,374 0.9916 1,565,165 1.0281 1,875,810 1.0083 1,189,712 1.2888 463,551 0.6737 1,194,158 0.8522 5,565,369 1.1366 3,717,473 1.2908 495,987 1.0244 491,122 1.2176 25,362,757 1.7156 619,566 0.9595 1,125,258 0.8368 683,369 1.1133 4,682,671 0.9781 352,126 0.9201 1,201,971 1.0154 5,279,185 1.0158 1,744,761 0.7770 2,334,564 1.2606 4,389,278 1.0769 1,395,498 0.8166 1,077,318 1.5229 2,912,783 0.6581 2,918,195 1.4358 645,585 0.6114 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 23579 DESCRIPTION Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadow s 10 Litchfield Vista View s II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigw am Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigw am Creek South Litchfield Vista View s IIIA& Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigw am Creek N 2&2b Coldw ater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver 5,363 7,751 12,651 53,524 28,727 14,576 53,768 24,354 12,415 20,288 9,084 3,936 11,226 26,357 22,550 20,796 1,311 10,729 4,754 21,436 13,154 7,294 3,781 18,202 2,750 9,654 772,425 1,608 7,994 106,082 54,905 2,086 16,697 25,474 4,719 58,212 1,440 5,099 32,103 6,297 35,742 10,470 83,953 17,816 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 5,313 7,674 12,521 52,979 28,432 14,425 53,217 24,121 12,301 20,102 9,001 3,900 11,111 26,082 22,318 20,579 1,299 10,623 4,706 21,211 13,031 7,218 3,744 18,025 2,722 10,204 765,132 1,593 7,935 105,056 54,462 2,066 16,569 25,273 4,679 57,736 1,429 5,059 31,863 6,250 35,465 10,390 83,411 17,678 120 Estimated TAX LEVY 5,942 8,227 14,973 55,401 30,385 14,584 55,576 29,940 12,725 22,297 9,182 4,043 11,847 26,661 23,840 21,071 133 12,552 4,939 22,318 14,562 7,661 4,613 23,126 3,219 13,155 977,247 2,033 9,715 109,075 69,219 2,411 20,930 31,751 5,501 73,168 1,698 6,473 44,002 7,738 44,930 11,435 106,624 22,993 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 541,856 1.0966 987,132 0.8334 2,213,668 0.6764 6,134,954 0.9030 3,346,662 0.9079 1,696,045 0.8599 5,367,916 1.0353 7,529,838 0.3976 3,370,564 0.3775 3,365,172 0.6626 2,798,285 0.3281 987,947 0.4092 1,493,534 0.7932 3,396,801 0.7849 2,018,998 1.1808 2,239,023 0.9411 1,330,226 0.0100 2,479,529 0.5062 508,335 0.9716 2,181,343 1.0231 2,062,876 0.7059 1,244,990 0.6153 1,385,670 0.3329 2,467,539 0.9372 1,280,280 0.2514 1,127,730 1.1665 116,634,879 0.8379 531,168 0.3827 2,405,337 0.4039 19,913,292 0.5477 14,595,459 0.4743 790,080 0.3052 3,929,741 0.5326 8,675,930 0.3660 3,290,700 0.1672 19,505,526 0.3751 1,996,213 0.0851 4,730,516 0.1368 10,186,382 0.4320 1,800,320 0.4298 9,058,464 0.4960 1,508,849 0.7579 21,337,620 0.4997 17,062,467 0.1348 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2015 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District (continued) FY 2014 BUDGET DIST # 23580 23594 23595 23596 23697 DESCRIPTION SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Arroyo Norte Unit 4 Totals 13435 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 23104 Litchfield Vista View s 4,553 28,664 4,568 730 4,824 5,470,161 2,980 2,422 Estimated FY 2015 BUDGET 4,511 32,451 4,532 724 4,786 5,412,277 2,952 2,422 121 Estimated TAX LEVY 5,874 32,383 5,875 929 5,452 5,972,885 2,831 3,010 TAX YEAR Estimated Tax Year 2014 2014 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 0.1334 4,404,030 1.2251 2,643,340 6,083,026 0.0966 1,178,040 0.0789 1,411,298 0.3863 983,622,406 2012 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 0.9037 0.2198