MARICOPA COUNTY FY 2014 Annual Business Strategies ADOPTED BUDGET Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Estimating Fund Balances Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program 1 2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 16 16 27 28 29 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 32 33 37 38 38 40 61 Library District 63 Motion i Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Staffing Variance Analysis General Adjustments Programs and Activities Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 64 65 67 68 69 70 71 71 72 73 74 74 75 75 75 75 76 78 80 81 81 82 82 82 83 83 85 Stadium District Motion Executive Summary Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision, Strategic Goals Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Programs and Activities ii 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 103 103 104 104 104 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service 107 107 107 107 107 107 108 110 113 Improvement Districts 119 120 121 Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion Approve the Flood Control District FY 2014 Adopted Budget in the amount of $72,009,409 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Flood Control District. Approve the Adopted Maricopa County Flood Control District property tax levy for Fiscal Year 2014, which is a reduction of $14,741,593 from the FY 2013 Flood Control District property tax levy. Approve the attached Executive Summary. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2014 Adopted Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guideline to conform with the budget. 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Denny Barney, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Clint Hickman, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The FY 2014 adopted expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $72,009,409. Capital project expenditures are budgeted at $40,000,000 in FY 2014, a $10,000,000 decrease from FY 2013. The budget continues to provide a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Commercial and residential property values continue to decline in Maricopa County for FY 2014. The FY 2014 budget has been developed with a decreased tax rate of $0.1392 per hundred dollars net assessed value. This has decreased the Flood Control District Levy to $39,842,985 in FY 2014, a decrease of $14,741,593 from FY 2013. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals $5,688,318 for cost-sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2014, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $40.2 million, which is $14.2M (26%) less than in FY 2013. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2012 through FY 2014 $56,000,000 $50,000,000 $44,000,000 $38,000,000 $32,000,000 $26,000,000 $20,000,000 FY 2012 Actuals FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Budget The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. In all, the Flood Control District has 51 scheduled projects totaling $194,000,000 in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Andy Kunasek Chairman, Board of Directors Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Bethany Home Outfall Channel Indian Bend Wash 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Harold Sigüenza, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) is to provide regional flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation an education to Maricopa County residents so they can reduce the risk of injury, death, and property damage from flooding, while still enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The Flood Control District vision is for the residents of Maricopa County and future generations to have the maximum level of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multi-use facilities that complement and enhance the beauty of our desert environment. Strategic Goals Department Specific By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to District social media satisfaction surveys will indicate satisfaction with the District’s use of social media to provide flood hazard education. Status: The District will increase utilization of social media outlets to provide flood hazard education, will issue periodic surveys to gauge satisfaction, and will use survey responses to pursue continuous improvement. This is a new goal for FY 2014 and a baseline measure will be assessed. Department Specific By June 30, 2018, 85% or more of County residents who respond to the Citizen Satisfaction Survey will indication satisfaction with the District. Status: In FY 2013, 90% of County resident survey respondents indicated that they were “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with the District’s services. The District will continue to emphasize customer service in all aspects of its operations to maintain and improve Citizen satisfaction. Quality Workforce By June 30, 2018, the annual voluntary turnover rate of District full-time employees will be 10% or less. Status: In FY 2012, the District experienced 5% voluntary turnover rate, meeting the current goal. In the next few years, the District will see more employees reach retirement status, causing higher voluntary turnover, but the District will continue to focus efforts on employee wellness and training to maintain a superior working environment for District staff. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Safe Communities Flood Control District By June 30, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Project Program submittals. Status: The District will reserve $1.5 million in annual funding within its Capital Improvement Program to support the Small Project Program. Should qualifying submittals require more than $1.5 million in funding; the District will work to shift its financial resources to support the additional funding needs. As of FY 2011, the District has approved funding for 32 out of 32 small project submittals that qualified for program funding, and will continue to maintain current trends. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will have conducted engineering inspections on 100% of District-maintained non-dam structures completed prior to 1996; and, the District will initiative corrective action on 50% of identified deficiencies, extending the useful life of those structures to provide ongoing flood protection to downstream residents. Status: The District will identify applicable structures, formulate an engineering inspection program, identify and prioritize deficiencies, and initiate corrective actions on prioritized items. This is a new goal for FY 2014 and a baseline measure will be assessed. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018, the District will increase County resident’s insurance premium discounts from 30% to 35% through the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System program. Status: The District will pursue Class 3 status in the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System program (and the associated insurance discount) through increased implementation of the Community Rating System’s Four Series of Activities (Public Information, Mapping and Regulations, Flood Damage Reduction, and Warning and Response). In FY 2012, Unincorporated Maricopa County advanced to a FEMA Rating System Class 4 community, establishing a resident flood insurance discount rate of 30%. Safe Communities By June 30, 2018 the District will increase the accuracy and effectiveness of flood hazard identification for 25% of prioritized watershed so that underlying County residents can be best informed of flooding hazard. Status: The District will identify prioritized watersheds most in need of updated flood hazard identification. District planning and delineation studies in these watersheds will employ updated and enhanced mapping and modeling techniques. This is a new goal for FY 2014 and a baseline measure will be assessed. 6 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type CAPITAL PROJECTS SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 6,396,917 SUBTOTAL $ 46,446,536 - $ 52,843,453 - $ - $ 39,364,869 $ 166,000 155,382 250,000 297,643 40,233,894 $ - $ $ 39,364,869 166,000 155,382 250,000 297,643 40,233,894 75,000 7,886,000 14,696,402 75,000 $ 22,582,402 $ 7,961,000 14,696,402 22,657,402 $ (14,696,402) (14,696,402) $ 7,961,000 7,961,000 62,891,296 $ (14,696,402) $ 48,194,894 - $ - $ 15,748,930 $ 2,033,943 13,581,352 570,184 31,934,409 $ - $ $ 15,748,930 2,033,943 13,581,352 570,184 31,934,409 - $ 2,300,000 $ 75,000 37,700,000 14,696,402 14,771,402 $ 40,000,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 75,000 37,700,000 14,696,402 54,771,402 $ - $ (14,696,402) (14,696,402) $ 2,300,000 75,000 37,700,000 40,075,000 TOTAL USES $ 46,705,811 (14,696,402) $ 72,009,409 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 8,299,485 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - NON-RECURRING OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ TOTAL SOURCES $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING USES $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 39,364,869 $ 166,000 155,382 250,000 297,643 40,233,894 $ 40,308,894 $ 22,582,402 15,748,930 $ 2,033,943 13,581,352 570,184 31,934,409 $ $ 52,843,453 TOTAL $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ $ ELIMINATIONS $ 40,000,000 $ 86,705,811 $ $ - $ 8,299,485 $ - $ 8,299,485 $ 29,028,938 $ 29,028,938 $ - $ 29,028,938 7 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2013 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FY 2013 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 33,775,369 $ 33,775,369 $ 31,934,409 $ 1,840,960 54,098,533 54,378,095 14,696,402 39,681,693 $ 87,873,902 $ 88,153,464 $ 46,630,811 $ 41,522,653 $ 349,000 $ 429,000 $ 75,000 $ 354,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 450,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 47,980,000 47,980,000 38,450,000 9,530,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (14,696,402) $ (20,121,297) $ 84,124,369 $ 103,764,765 $ 72,009,409 $ 31,755,356 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $72,009,409 Fund Balance $23,838,397 33% Property Taxes $39,364,869 55% Intergovernmental & Grants $8,092,500 11% Miscellaneous & Interest $547,643 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $166,000 0% Uses of Funds $72,009,409 Information Technology $2,532,321 4% Administrative Services $5,935,951 8% Floord Hazard Identification $8,679,097 12% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,151,803 3% Flood Hazard Regulation $2,294,442 3% Flood Hazard Remediation $50,415,795 70% 9 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2012 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ - $ 162,856 162,856 $ 13,000 $ 126,500 139,500 $ 13,000 $ 126,500 139,500 $ 5,855 $ 143,166 149,021 $ 3,000 $ 136,000 139,000 $ (10,000) 9,500 (500) -76.9% 7.5% -0.4% $ $ 320,286 $ 320,286 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ 269,686 $ 269,686 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ (274,000) (274,000) -78.5% -78.5% $ 3,553,440 $ 9,321,483 71,956 12,946,879 $ 4,800,000 $ 2,922,000 7,722,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 2,922,000 7,722,000 $ 2,763,000 $ 2,925,318 5,688,318 $ - $ 7,886,000 7,886,000 $ (4,800,000) 4,964,000 164,000 -100.0% 169.9% N/A 2.1% - $ 4,000 183,384 187,384 $ - $ 4,000 183,384 187,384 $ - $ 41,435 3,682,080 3,723,515 $ - $ 4,000 305,643 309,643 $ $ FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ 36,796 $ 30,174 16,725,828 16,792,798 $ 122,259 122,259 N/A 0.0% 66.7% 65.2% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 68,694,724 $ 68,694,724 $ 54,184,203 $ 54,184,203 $ 54,184,203 $ 54,184,203 $ 54,184,358 $ 54,184,358 $ 39,770,251 $ 39,770,251 $ (14,413,952) (14,413,952) -26.6% -26.6% GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 953,422 $ 953,422 $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 50,691 $ 50,691 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ (65,000) (65,000) -81.3% -81.3% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 99,870,965 $ 62,582,087 $ 62,662,087 $ 64,065,589 $ 48,194,894 $ (14,467,193) -23.1% 652,722 $ 1,683,645 2,336,367 $ 617,323 $ 1,887,077 2,504,400 $ 643,299 $ 1,889,369 2,532,668 $ 621,007 $ 1,866,817 2,487,824 $ 481,122 $ 1,813,320 2,294,442 $ 162,177 76,049 238,226 25.2% 4.0% 9.4% 205,302 $ 374,227 1,284,442 696,570 2,560,541 $ 249,855 $ 370,602 1,232,205 856,433 2,709,095 $ 249,855 $ 372,511 1,232,205 856,433 2,711,004 $ 217,568 $ 364,803 1,202,812 810,536 2,595,719 $ 171,406 $ 265,695 1,222,264 492,438 2,151,803 $ 78,449 106,816 9,941 363,995 559,201 31.4% 28.7% 0.8% 42.5% 20.6% 2,327,011 $ 4,794,233 7,121,244 $ 2,564,121 $ 6,466,611 9,030,732 $ 2,602,623 $ 6,418,812 9,021,435 $ 2,619,169 $ 5,955,051 8,574,220 $ 2,112,949 $ 6,566,148 8,679,097 $ 489,674 (147,336) 342,338 18.8% -2.3% 3.8% 10,260,140 $ 48,140,265 7,648,453 66,048,858 $ 13,982,669 $ 40,296,873 7,512,269 61,791,811 $ 13,201,699 $ 60,146,366 7,474,801 80,822,866 $ 10,756,036 $ 66,148,727 6,828,220 83,732,983 $ - $ 41,559,347 8,856,448 50,415,795 $ 13,201,699 18,587,019 (1,381,647) 30,407,071 100.0% 30.9% -18.5% 37.6% 61,800 $ 617,940 314,179 208,240 1,444,388 283,318 38,928 940,447 3,909,240 $ 66,700 $ 558,230 384,658 107,843 1,766,024 282,712 38,744 878,180 4,083,091 $ 53,744 $ 558,230 421,560 496,292 1,809,549 274,070 38,744 878,180 4,530,369 $ 51,634 $ 531,166 372,727 497,244 1,403,549 239,978 39,574 791,049 3,926,921 $ 62,318 $ 726,865 391,511 137,751 1,605,890 268,329 39,962 697,054 3,929,680 $ (8,574) (168,635) 30,049 358,541 203,659 5,741 (1,218) 181,126 600,689 -16.0% -30.2% 7.1% 72.2% 11.3% 2.1% -3.1% 20.6% 13.3% 1,274,433 $ 202,197 1,476,630 $ 1,524,626 $ 116,784 1,641,410 $ 1,524,626 $ 116,784 1,641,410 $ 1,524,626 $ 448,503 1,973,129 $ 1,592,089 $ 414,182 2,006,271 $ (67,463) (297,398) (364,861) -4.4% -254.7% -22.2% $ 540,457 $ 356,531 231,604 2,190,515 51,851 3,370,958 $ 619,875 $ 307,157 242,093 1,139,032 55,673 2,363,830 $ 619,875 $ 307,157 242,093 1,280,215 55,673 2,505,013 $ 543,734 $ 257,330 229,977 1,185,359 45,407 2,261,807 $ 693,828 $ 354,231 287,067 1,147,103 50,092 2,532,321 $ (73,953) (47,074) (44,974) 133,112 5,581 (27,308) -11.9% -15.3% -18.6% 10.4% 10.0% -1.1% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 86,823,838 $ 84,124,369 $ 103,764,765 $ 105,552,603 $ 72,009,409 $ USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ $ $ $ $ DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDGT - BUDGETING FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 10 31,755,356 30.6% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category $ $ 53,752,703 53,752,703 $ $ 53,752,703 53,752,703 $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 61,725,304 61,725,304 $ SUBTOTAL $ 15,700,800 $ 15,700,800 $ 166,400 $ 166,400 $ 166,400 $ 166,400 $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 351,528 $ 12,870,347 190,716 13,412,591 $ 349,000 $ 7,722,000 131,500 8,202,500 $ 429,000 $ 7,722,000 131,500 8,282,500 $ 6,767,462 $ 2,264,808 9,032,270 $ 300,000 $ 160,484 460,484 $ 300,000 $ 160,484 460,484 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ FY 2014 ADOPTED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2012 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ $ 39,364,869 39,364,869 $ $ (14,387,834) (14,387,834) -26.8% -26.8% 246,742 $ 246,742 $ 166,000 166,000 $ $ (400) (400) -0.2% -0.2% 53,752,703 53,752,703 349,686 5,688,318 163,112 6,201,116 $ $ - $ 7,961,000 155,382 8,116,382 $ $ -16.7% 85.5% 18.9% $ (14,467,193) -23.1% 250,000 297,643 547,643 $ 99,870,965 $ 62,582,087 $ 62,662,087 $ 64,065,589 $ 48,194,894 TOTAL SOURCES $ 99,870,965 FY 2012 ACTUAL $ 62,582,087 FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 62,662,087 FY 2013 REVISED $ 64,065,589 FY 2013 FORECAST $ 48,194,894 FY 2014 ADOPTED (429,000) -100.0% 239,000 3.1% 18.2% 23,882 -2.0% (166,118) (50,000) 137,159 87,159 268,543 $ 3,596,485 3,865,028 $ ALL REVENUES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES $ 0701 - REGULAR PAY 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ REVISED VS ADOPTED % VAR $ (14,467,193) -23.1% REVISED VS ADOPTED % VAR 571,890 $ 156,847 (78,034) 16,920,783 17,571,486 $ 14,057,874 $ 64,552 48,023 4,965,341 37,000 (5,567,099) 4,770,448 18,376,139 $ 14,049,973 $ 58,561 48,023 4,961,806 548,671 (5,664,981) 4,829,177 18,831,230 $ 13,451,235 $ 44,417 26,859 4,774,469 419,691 (5,360,799) 4,475,234 17,831,106 $ 13,795,912 $ 74,847 4,847,907 37,000 (5,402,107) 4,643,777 17,997,336 $ 254,061 58,561 (26,824) 113,899 511,671 (262,874) 185,400 833,894 1.8% 100.0% -55.9% 2.3% 93.3% -4.6% 3.8% 4.4% - $ 1,538,053 1,538,053 $ 1,232,010 $ 446,171 125,850 (46,000) 147,731 1,905,762 $ 1,232,010 $ 446,171 125,850 (46,000) 147,731 1,905,762 $ 1,058,522 $ 412,698 162,507 (43,864) 149,519 1,739,382 $ 1,279,250 $ 439,735 155,300 (63,050) 222,708 2,033,943 $ (47,240) 6,436 (29,450) 17,050 (74,977) (128,181) -3.8% 1.4% -23.4% 37.1% -50.8% -6.7% - $ 329,310 1 12,571,179 12,900,490 $ 451,250 $ 11,000,735 415,340 380,715 2,630,227 143,650 157,306 24,150 355,200 (41,088) 61,671 15,579,156 $ 19,556,555 $ 11,080,735 415,340 380,715 2,630,227 143,650 157,306 24,150 355,200 (41,088) 61,671 34,764,461 $ 25,496,598 $ 9,958,356 382,775 450,165 2,623,792 1 118,779 112,068 20,999 343,282 (50,398) 65,540 39,521,957 $ 372,000 $ 9,213,363 438,143 332,669 2,711,629 144,575 145,000 13,650 355,200 (213,649) 195,366 13,707,946 $ 98.1% 19,184,555 16.9% 1,867,372 -5.5% (22,803) 12.6% 48,046 -3.1% (81,402) N/A -0.6% (925) 7.8% 12,306 43.5% 10,500 0.0% 172,561 420.0% (133,695) -216.8% 60.6% 21,056,515 $ 6,305,922 $ 336,520 1,632,950 46,517,905 20,512 54,813,809 $ 2,110,000 $ 72,200 582,000 45,490,000 9,112 48,263,312 $ 4,264,000 $ 72,200 582,000 43,336,000 9,112 48,263,312 $ 3,055,937 $ 201,675 657,800 42,540,190 4,556 46,460,158 $ 2,305,000 $ 216,250 351,500 35,395,000 2,434 38,270,184 $ 45.9% 1,959,000 (144,050) -199.5% 230,500 39.6% 18.3% 7,941,000 6,678 73.3% 9,993,128 20.7% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 86,823,838 $ 84,124,369 $ 103,764,765 $ 105,552,603 $ 72,009,409 $ 31,755,356 30.6% TOTAL USES $ 86,823,838 $ 84,124,369 $ 103,764,765 $ 105,552,603 $ 72,009,409 $ 31,755,356 30.6% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0910 - LAND 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT APS ES ESCO IMPROVEMENTS FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FUND TOTAL FY 2012 ACTUAL $ 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 11,242 $ 340,286 351,528 $ - $ 349,000 349,000 $ - $ 429,000 429,000 $ - $ 349,686 349,686 $ - $ 75,000 75,000 $ (354,000) (354,000) N/A -82.5% -82.5% 86,606,934 $ 784 86,607,718 $ 54,511,087 $ 54,511,087 $ 54,511,087 $ 54,511,087 $ 58,027,585 $ 58,027,585 $ 40,233,894 $ 40,233,894 $ (14,277,193) (14,277,193) -26.2% N/A -26.2% SOURCES $ 45,000,000 $ 36,796 12,874,923 57,911,719 $ 54,098,533 $ 7,722,000 61,820,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 7,722,000 42,539,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 5,688,318 59,786,851 $ 14,696,402 $ 7,886,000 22,582,402 $ (20,121,297) 164,000 (19,957,297) -57.8% N/A 2.1% -46.9% $ SOURCES $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ 20,121,297 20,121,297 -57.8% -57.8% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 ADOPTED 86,618,176 $ 54,511,087 $ 13,252,789 $ 8,071,000 $ 99,870,965 $ 62,582,087 $ FY 2013 FY 2012 ACTUAL ADOPTED 54,511,087 $ 58,027,585 $ 40,233,894 $ (14,277,193) -26.2% 8,151,000 $ 6,038,004 $ 7,961,000 $ (190,000) -2.3% 62,662,087 $ 64,065,589 $ 48,194,894 $ (14,467,193) -23.1% FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED VS ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % 349,686 $ 349,686 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 354,000 354,000 82.5% 82.5% 33,775,369 $ 54,098,533 87,873,902 $ 31,893,697 $ 33,775,369 $ 54,378,095 79,581,223 88,153,464 $ 111,474,920 $ 31,934,409 $ 14,696,402 46,630,811 $ 1,840,960 39,681,693 41,522,653 5.5% 73.0% 47.1% $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 329,310 $ 329,310 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ $ 31,291,268 $ 45,000,000 76,291,268 $ 429,000 $ 429,000 $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG $ FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 1,692,048 $ 58,213 53,452,999 55,203,260 $ 2,000,000 $ 20,000 47,980,000 50,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 20,000 47,980,000 50,000,000 $ 1,982,623 $ 17,416 45,826,491 47,826,530 $ 1,550,000 $ 38,450,000 40,000,000 $ 450,000 20,000 9,530,000 10,000,000 22.5% 100.0% 19.9% 20.0% (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) $ (20,121,297) (20,121,297) 57.8% 57.8% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 31,291,268 $ 55,532,570 $ 86,823,838 $ 33,775,369 $ 31,893,697 $ 33,775,369 $ 73,658,906 $ 50,349,000 $ 69,989,396 $ 84,124,369 $ 103,764,765 $ 105,552,603 $ 31,934,409 $ 40,075,000 $ 72,009,409 $ 1,840,960 29,914,396 31,755,356 5.5% 42.7% 30.6% 12 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfer In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 Non-Recurring $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 Non-Recurring $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 ELIMINATIONS $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) Non-Recurring $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS - Fund Transfer Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 Non-Recurring $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 Non-Recurring $ 54,098,533 $ 34,817,699 $ 54,098,533 $ 14,696,402 ELIMINATIONS $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) Non-Recurring $ (54,098,533) $ (34,817,699) $ (54,098,533) $ (14,696,402) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 13 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROCUREMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION FLOOD WARNING PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2013 FY 2012 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2014 FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED VAR % REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .95 11.60 1.00 7.35 2.00 4.10 27.00 1.00 55.00 .80 12.00 1.00 7.20 4.00 27.00 1.00 53.00 .80 12.00 1.00 7.20 4.00 27.00 1.00 53.00 1.00 15.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 27.00 1.00 56.00 .20 3.00 (.20) 3.00 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% (2.8%) N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% .65 .05 .70 17.27 11.15 28.42 16.67 11.15 27.82 16.67 11.15 27.82 25.00 9.00 34.00 8.33 (2.15) 6.18 50.0% (19.3%) 22.2% .15 .15 2.55 5.73 4.05 10.18 22.51 2.55 5.73 4.05 10.18 22.51 2.55 5.73 4.05 10.18 22.51 2.00 5.00 3.00 9.00 19.00 (.55) (.73) (1.05) (1.18) (3.51) (21.6%) (12.7%) (25.9%) (11.6%) (15.6%) .75 .40 1.15 16.75 8.25 25.00 16.60 8.15 24.75 16.60 8.15 24.75 16.00 6.00 22.00 (.60) (2.15) (2.75) (3.6%) (26.4%) (11.1%) .15 .85 1.00 2.00 10.72 34.75 61.10 106.57 10.57 34.75 61.10 106.42 10.57 34.75 61.10 106.42 26.00 77.00 103.00 (10.57) (8.75) 15.90 (3.42) (100.0%) (25.2%) 26.0% (3.2%) 8.00 16.50 16.50 254.00 17.50 17.50 252.00 17.50 17.50 252.00 18.00 18.00 252.00 .50 .50 - 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 14 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Administrative Staff Supv Administrative Supervisor Administrator Applications Development Mgr Applications Development Supv Atmospheric Science Pro Attorney - Senior Counsel Chemical Applicatns Tech Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Communicatn Officer Supervisor Construction Maintenance Supv Crew Leader Database Administrator Development Svcs Specialist Development Svcs Supervisor Development Svcs Technician Director - Flood Control Dist Engineer Engineering Associate Engineering Manager Engineering Specialist Engineering Supervisor Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Executive Assistant Field Operations Supervisor Finance Manager - Large Finance Support Supervisor Finance/Business Analyst Financial Supervisor - Dept General Maintenance Worker GIS Programmer/Analyst GIS Programmer/Analyst - Ld GIS Technician Heavy Equipment Operator Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Specialist Inspection Supervisor Inspector Instrumentation Tech-Water Management Analyst Management Assistant Materials Inventory Specialist Mechanic - Automotive Media Specialist Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized Operations Supervisor - PW Operations/Program Manager Operations/Program Supervisor Planning Supervisor Procurement Specialist Procurement Supervisor - Dept Public Works Chief Appraiser Real Property Manager Real Property Specialist FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 34.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 0.0% 19.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% 16.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.0% 10.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 1.00 12.5% 2.00 2.00 1.00 (1.00) (50.0%) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 0.0% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.0% 15 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title (continued) MARKET RANGE TITLE Real Property Supervisor Software Sys Engineer Technical Program Supv Trades Generalist Water Instrument Tech Supv Web Designer/Developer Department Total FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 8.00 254.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 0.0% Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 991 FLOOD CONTROL Department Total FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 8.00 254.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 0.0% 8.00 254.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 0.0% General Adjustments Revenue: Decrease property tax revenue by $15,049,017 based on the Chairman’s Office request. Personnel: Increase Regular Benefits by $57,397 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. Services: Increase Other Benefits and Internal Services Charges by $6,315 for the impact of the changes in Risk Management charges. Base Adjustments: Decrease in operating budget by $1,900,178 for general reductions by the Department in order to address revenue shortfalls and litigation costs. Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Regulation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Regulation Program is to provide advisory information and enforcement services to the public with property within floodplains so they can avoid causing adverse impacts to surrounding property, and use their property safely and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. 16 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplain permits and clearances completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request FY 2012 ACTUAL 89.6% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Permitting • Floodplain Regulation Compliance Floodplain Permitting Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Permitting Activity is to provide clearance and permitting services to the permit applicant so they can make changes needed to their plans or pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain permits and clearances completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Percent of map change first reviews completed within 90 days of submittal to the District Number of floodplain clearance and permit applications reviewed Number of map change reviews completed Number of floodplain clearance and permit applications submitted Number of map change reviews requested Total expenditure per map change review FY 2012 ACTUAL 89.6% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 357 350 350 350 - 0.0% 34 357 8 350 8 350 8 350 - 0.0% 0.0% 34 $ 49,518.97 8 $ 236,171.13 8 $ 233,352.13 8 $ 226,665.00 $ 9,506.13 0.0% 4.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ $ $ $ $ 136,000 136,000 $ $ 9,500 9,500 7.5% 7.5% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,683,645 $ 1,683,645 $ 1,813,320 $ 1,813,320 $ $ 76,049 76,049 4.0% 4.0% 162,856 162,856 126,500 126,500 $ $ 143,166 143,166 Expenditure $ 1,889,369 $ 1,889,369 $ 1,866,817 $ 1,866,817 Activity Narrative: The FY 2014 performance measures are in line with the Forecast for FY 2013. Activity demand is generally driven by development in unincorporated Maricopa County, and the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. Demand has continued to be at lower levels due to the economic recession. FY 2014 expenditures are decreasing due to lower level of complexity in the demand for these services. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity is to provide inspection and enforcement services to property owners so they can develop their property without adversely impacting surrounding property. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request Number of floodplain complaints investigated Number of floodplain use permit inspections completed Number of floodplain complaints Number of floodplain use permits requiring inspection Total expenditure per floodplain use permit inspection completed FY 2012 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 98.6% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57 642 100 550 100 550 100 550 - 0.0% 0.0% 57 642 100 550 100 550 100 550 - 0.0% 0.0% $ 1,016.70 $ 1,169.63 $ 1,129.10 $ 874.77 $ 294.87 25.2% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - $ $ 13,000 13,000 $ $ 5,855 5,855 $ $ 3,000 3,000 $ $ (10,000) (10,000) -76.9% -76.9% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 652,722 652,722 $ $ 643,299 643,299 $ $ 621,007 621,007 $ $ 481,122 481,122 $ $ 162,177 162,177 25.2% 25.2% Revenue Expenditure Activity Narrative: Activity demand is driven by development in unincorporated Maricopa County, and in the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. Decrease in expenditures is due to low demand and re-organization of staff. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information services to the public and other agencies so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves from injury and loss of property from flooding. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed or electronic materials Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received FY 2012 ACTUAL 74.1% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 95.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 95.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % -5.0% -5.0% 93.2% 100.0% 95.0% 98.0% -2.0% -2.0% 99.4% 99.0% 99.2% 99.0% -0.0% -0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise the program include: • Flood Control Customer Service • Flood Control Public Information • • Flood Safety Education Flood Warning Flood Control Customer Service Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Customer Service Activity is to provide responsive flood hazard and mitigation advisory information services to the general public, government agencies and other entities so they can make informed development decisions and be protected from loss of life and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of Floodplain Management & Services customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests completed Number of Floodplain Management & Services customer information requests received Total activity expenditure per citizen information request response provided FY 2012 ACTUAL 98.1% FY 2013 FY 2013 FORECAST REVISED 100.0% 100.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 3,033 3,000 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% 3,033 3,000 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% $ 123.39 $ 124.17 $ 121.60 $ 88.57 $ 35.61 28.7% $ $ 374,227 374,227 $ $ 372,511 372,511 $ $ 364,803 364,803 $ $ 265,695 265,695 $ $ 106,816 106,816 28.7% 28.7% Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES Activity Narrative: Citizen demand has continued to be at low levels due to the economic recession, compared to previous years. However, other services provided in this Activity are seeing steady demand, such as federal obligations related to the National Flood Insurance Program and other regulatory tasks. Expenditures are decreasing due to reallocation of personnel to another activity. 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Public Information Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Public Information Activity is to provide project and study information services to affected Maricopa County residents and property owners so they can understand how their flooding risk is being mitigated in order to preclude injury, loss of life, and property damage. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3609E requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of affected residents surveyed who 74.1% 100.0% 95.0% 95.0% (5.0%) -5.0% report that the printed or electronic materials they received were useful to understand the subject project or study Number of public meetings held 11 23 23 26 3 13.0% Number of printed materials produced 57 40 40 50 10 25.0% Number of website hits received 12,489,570 5,400,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 6,600,000 122.2% Number of public meetings required 11 23 23 26 3 13.0% Number of printed materials (including 57 40 40 50 10 25.0% brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ 0.02 $ 0.05 $ 0.02 $ 0.01 $ 0.03 69.1% that utilized the District website Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 205,302 205,302 $ $ 249,855 249,855 $ $ 217,568 217,568 $ $ 171,406 171,406 $ $ 78,449 78,449 31.4% 31.4% Activity Narrative: The District’s successful outreach methods have produced an increase in demand for more information. The public outreach effort has in turn led to more Maricopa County Residents visiting the District’s website. Expenditures are decreasing due to the reallocation of personnel to another activity. Flood Safety Education Activity The purpose of the Flood Safety Education Activity is to provide flood and storm water safety education services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can be aware of flood hazards and understand how to avoid injury and loss of life due to flooding. Mandates: Administrative mandate. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that 93.2% 100.0% 95.0% 98.0% (2.0%) -2.0% understand media messages and/or civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Number of school and civic presentations 4 9 9 9 0.0% completed Number of school and civic presentations 3 9 9 9 0.0% requested Total expenditure per school and civic $ 174,142.50 $ 95,159.22 $ 90,059.56 $ 54,715.33 $ 40,443.89 42.5% presentation Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 696,570 696,570 20 $ $ 856,433 856,433 $ $ 810,536 810,536 $ $ 492,438 492,438 $ $ 363,995 363,995 42.5% 42.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Activity Narrative: Expenditures under this Activity are decreasing due to operating budget reductions by the Department addressing a revenue shortfall. In FY 2013, the District implemented a pilot program to convey education messages through billboard advertising and will expect a similar demand for school and civic presentations as they experienced in FY 2013. Flood Warning Activity The purpose of the Flood Warning Activity is to provide reliable weather, water level and stream flow information and flood response planning services to public safety managers so they can make public safety decisions in a timely and effective manner. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 requires the District to operate in accordance with Federal guidance that is normally issued in the form of structure Operating and Maintenance Manuals. The manuals federally direct the District to operate and maintain the structure and other equipment installed during construction in accordance with the standard in that manual. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and related laws require entities such as the District to protect those in a floodplain. In order to fulfill this requirement, monitoring is required to provide sufficient lead-time to allow evacuation of those in danger. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of days during which reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Number of sensor-days during which District ALERT system sensors are operational Number of flood response plans completed Number of sensor-days during which ALERT system sensors are needed Number of flood response plans requested Total activity expenditure per operational ALERT sensor-day FY 2012 ACTUAL 99.4% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 99.0% 99.2% 100.0% $ 100.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 99.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.0%) -0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 238,325 241,744 241,965 244,930 3,186 1.3% 1 239,658 1 244,185 1 243,970 1 247,404 3,219 0.0% 1.3% 1 5.39 $ 1 5.10 $ 1 4.97 1 4.99 $ 0.11 0.0% 2.1% $ 1,222,264 $ 1,222,264 $ $ 9,941 9,941 0.8% 0.8% $ Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 1,284,442 $ 1,284,442 $ 1,232,205 $ 1,232,205 $ 1,202,812 $ 1,202,812 Activity Narrative: The District had 662 sensors in place during FY 2013. Three sensors were installed in FY 2013 as the Flood Control District continued to expand the effectiveness of its flood warning network increasing the Activity’s outputs and demands. Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide flood hazard information and solution services to government entities so they can utilize knowledge of flood hazards to protect the public and infrastructure. 21 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of linear miles of floodplains delineated Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards FY 2012 ACTUAL 68.1% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 69.2% 68.6% 35.6% 54.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 68.6% 44.9% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % -0.7% -0.9% 48.3% -5.8% -10.7% Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Hazard Planning • Floodplain Delineation Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services to municipalities and public agencies so they can have the information necessary to mitigate identified flood and erosion hazards. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards Cumulative square miles of Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed through the end of this fiscal year Number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of new Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of updated Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Total number of square miles identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Number of linear miles of watercourse identified for Watercourse Master Plans Number of population in areas identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Total activity expenditure per number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year FY 2012 ACTUAL 35.6% $ FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 54.0% 44.9% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (5.8%) -10.7% FY 2014 ADOPTED 48.3% 3,029 3,254 3,590 3,862 199,367 504,318 292,407 317,642 (186,676) -37.0% 460 318 234 272 (46) -14.5% 749 138 106 116 (22) -15.9% 8,509 6,022 8,002 8,002 1,980 32.9% 191 191 191 191 - 0.0% 3,816,978 2,908,493 3,793,152 3,793,152 884,659 30.4% 24.05 $ 12.73 $ 20.37 $ 608 18.7% 20.67 $ (7.94) -62.4% $ 6,566,148 $ 6,566,148 $ $ (147,336) (147,336) -2.3% -2.3% Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 4,794,233 $ 4,794,233 $ 6,418,812 $ 6,418,812 $ 5,955,051 $ 5,955,051 Activity Narrative: Activity demand is driven by changes in population. Population density varies with each project, causing fluctuations in the number of residents that will benefit. As a result, the District 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District anticipates a reduction in output related to population, due to these fluctuations. The increase in expenditures for FY 2014 is attributed to District’s focus on conducting flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services in-house, in place of contracting it out. As a result, the District will conduct a staffing studying to determine the proper size of staff needed to conduct the lower demanded services provided through this activity. Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide National Floodplain Insurance Programbased flood hazard identification services to floodplain administrators so they can have the necessary information available to regulate floodplains. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3605, 48-3606, 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of linear miles of floodplains 68.1% 69.2% 68.6% 68.6% (0.7%) -0.9% delineated Number of cumulative linear miles of 4,078 4,144 4,105 4,105 (39) -0.9% floodplains delineated through the end of the fiscal year Linear miles of floodplains currently under 338 159 144 139 (20) -12.6% delineation study Linear miles of floodplain delineated this fiscal 196 159 144 139 (20) -12.6% year Total number of linear miles of floodplains 5,985 5,985 5,985 5,985 0.0% requiring delineation Total activity expenditure per linear mile of $ 11,890.71 $ 16,368.70 $ 18,188.67 $ 15,201.07 $ 1,167.63 7.1% floodplain delineated this fiscal year Revenue 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 320,286 320,286 $ $ 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 349,000 349,000 $ $ 309,310 2,017,701 $ 2,327,011 $ 269,686 269,686 $ $ 349,000 2,253,623 $ 2,602,623 $ 75,000 75,000 $ $ (274,000) (274,000) -78.5% -78.5% 269,686 2,349,483 $ 2,619,169 $ 75,000 2,037,949 $ 2,112,949 $ 274,000 215,674 489,674 78.5% 9.6% 18.8% Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: Activity demand is generally constant, as floodplain delineation data requires update on an ongoing basis with delineation studies taking 1 to 3 years to complete. Specific regions requiring new large-scale delineations may cause short-term aberrations. The Federal Emergency Management Act Floodplain Map Maintenance Programs Grant will be concluding in FY 2014, resulting in a decrease in revenues and expenditures for the Grant Fund. In addition, the operating expenditures decrease is due to budget reductions and reallocation of personnel to another activity. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Program Results Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year having multi-purpose features Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year FY 2012 ACTUAL 2.6% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 10.2% 10.2% FY 2014 ADOPTED 0.7% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % -9.5% -93.2% 80.0% 50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 50.0% N/A N/A N/A 100.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77.3% N/A N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A 100.0% N/A N/A Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Control Capital Projects • Flood Control Structure Maintenance Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural flood protection services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can have increased physical protection from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 and 45-1424 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Flood Control District FY 2014 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2012 Measure REV VS ADOPTED % ADOPTED VAR REVISED FORECAST Description ACTUAL -93.2% 0.7% (9.5%) 10.2% 10.2% Percent of square miles of area that receive physical 2.6% protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% Percent of capital projects completed this fiscal year 80.0% 50.0% 50.0% having multi-purpose features N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 100.0% Percent of qualifying Small Project Assistance Program projects approved for District funding this fiscal year N/A N/A 77.3% Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona N/A N/A N/A Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies 0.0% 4 4 4 5 Number of capital projects completed this fiscal year N/A N/A 7 N/A Number of Small Project Assistance Program projects N/A N/A approved for District funding this fiscal year N/A N/A 6 Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones N/A N/A N/A completed this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding -11.1% (76) 610 686 686 Number of square miles of area benefited by projects 690 in current five-year Capital Improvement Program N/A N/A Number of qualifying Small Project Assistance N/A N/A N/A 7 Program projects requested this fiscal year N/A N/A Number of dam rehabilitation project milestones 6 N/A N/A N/A identified for completion this fiscal year to ensure physical protection from flooding 22.3% Total activity expenditure per square mile of area $ 69,748.28 $ 87,664.14 $ 96,412.66 $ 68,130.08 $ 19,534.06 benefited by projects completed this fiscal year Revenue 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 54,321,483 $ 37,739,699 $ 42,925,318 $ 22,582,402 $(15,157,297) 20,121,297 (45,000,000) (34,817,699) (40,000,000) (14,696,402) $ 9,321,483 $ 2,922,000 $ 2,925,318 $ 7,886,000 $ 4,964,000 -40.2% -57.8% 169.9% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 46,847,339 $ 56,175,065 $ 67,304,737 $ 16,255,749 $ 39,919,316 (1,211,000) 40,000,000 38,843,990 38,789,000 46,292,926 (45,000,000) (34,817,699) (40,000,000) (14,696,402) (20,121,297) $ 48,140,265 $ 60,146,366 $ 66,148,727 $ 41,559,347 $ 18,587,019 71.1% -3.1% 57.8% 30.9% Expenditure Activity Narrative: Demand is a function of the nature of projects in the Flood Control District’s fiveyear Capital Improvement Program, and the available funding for the program. The areas that benefit from projects can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on the number, size, type and location of the projects. Dam rehabilitation projects dramatically impact demand, as individual dam rehabilitation projects have very large corresponding benefited areas. As the dams age, required rehabilitation projects cause large demand increases. Demand and expenditures do not directly correlate, as urban-area projects may have high costs but comparatively less benefited area. The activity includes several new measures for FY 2014 due to the consolidation of the Dams Safety Activity and the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity. In addition, expenditures are increasing for FY 2014 because of the consolidation of the two activities. Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity is to provide flood control infrastructure maintenance services that meet federal, state and local safety and operational standards to residents and visitors of Maricopa County so they can experience protection from flooding as a consequence of safe and well maintained flood control structures. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 48-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed within 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within 90 calendar days Percent of District dams for which assessments were completed this fiscal year Number of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed Number of Work Orders completed Number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed Number of dam assessments provided this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones completed this fiscal year Number of Work Order requests submitted Number of dam assessments required this fiscal year Number of dam repair project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year Total activity expenditure per Work Order completed FY 2012 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2013 FY 2013 FORECAST REVISED 100.0% 100.0% FY 2014 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A 100.0% N/A N/A 21 30 23 24 (6) -20.0% 731 31 765 60 868 55 703 45 (62) (15) -8.1% -25.0% N/A N/A N/A 22 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 766 N/A 850 N/A 731 N/A 801 22 (49) N/A -5.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A (2,827.10) -28.9% $ 10,463.00 $ 9,770.98 $ 7,866.61 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ $ $ - $ $ - 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 7,648,453 $ 7,648,453 $ 12,598.08 $ $ $ $ $ Revenue 71,956 71,956 - - N/A N/A Expenditure $ 7,474,801 $ 7,474,801 $ 6,828,220 $ 6,828,220 $ 8,856,448 $ 8,856,448 $ (1,381,647) $ (1,381,647) -18.5% -18.5% Activity Narrative: Rehabilitation and improvement projects attempt to combat aging infrastructure concerns, and the District has increased collaborative efforts with law enforcement to reduce trespassing and vandalism. However, as the District’s most significant structures begin to approach their design life, maintenance demand will continue to increase and expenditure trends will correspondingly increase on a long-term basis. For FY 2014, the District consolidated the Dams Safety Activity with the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity. The increase in expenditures for FY 2014 is attributed to District’s focus on conducting flood control infrastructure maintenance services inhouse, in place of contracting it out. As a result, the District will conduct a staffing studying to determine the proper size of staff needed to conduct the lower demanded services provided through this activity. 26 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy property taxes on the secondary net Net Assessed Tax Rate assessed values of real property. Value (per $100 Unlike the County primary property tax Fiscal Year Tax Levy (Thousands) N.A.V.) levy, there is no constitutional limitation 2005 26,585,248 0.2119 50,550,367 on growth in District secondary 2006 29,605,196 0.2119 62,733,411 property taxes. However, the Flood 2007 32,778,027 0.2047 67,096,622 Control District Board of Directors has 2008 45,937,945 0.1533 70,422,870 chosen to impose growth limitations 2009 54,751,263 0.1367 74,674,333 similar to those imposed on the County 2010 54,862,329 0.1367 74,996,804 primary levy in order to minimize the 2011 45,681,391 0.1489 68,019,592 burden on taxpayers. As a result, 2012 35,056,838 0.1780 62,401,172 beginning in FY 2007 the secondary 2013 30,665,493 0.1780 54,584,578 levy associated with the Flood Control 2014 28,622,833 0.1392 39,842,985 District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2014. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2013 to FY 2014. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate for FY 2014 will be $0.1392 per $100 net assessed value. Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.2500 50 $0.2000 40 $0.1500 30 $0.1000 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) 60 $0.0500 10 0 $05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Fiscal Year The FY 2014 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $39,842,985, a decrease from the FY 2013 Adopted Levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered the last fiscal year as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to keep property tax rates flat. Description Net Assessed Value FY 2014 Adopted FY 2013 Adopted FY 2012 Adopted $ 28,622,833,869 $ $ 30,665,493,359 $ $ 35,056,838,356 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Revenue from 1Value w/SRP cent Levy 108,165,991 $ 28,730,999,860 $ 108,165,991 $ 30,773,659,350 $ 104,838,912 $ 35,161,677,268 $ 27 2,873,100 $ 3,077,366 $ 3,516,168 $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.1392 $ 0.1780 $ 0.1780 $ 39,842,985 $ 54,584,578 $ 62,401,172 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 155,382 $ 192,535 $ 186,613 $ 39,998,367 54,777,113 62,587,785 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Levy Limit FY 2014 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2014 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 88,501,802 0.3092 FY 2014 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 39,842,985 0.1392 Amount Under Limit: $ 48,658,817 0.1700 55.0% FY 2014 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY $ 55,098,955 FY 2014 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy 0.1925 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) FY 2014 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 39,842,985 0.1392 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 15,255,970 0.0533 FY 2014 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 102,100 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 19.65 14.21 5.44 28 $ 27.7% 27.7% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2013: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ 111,000 0.1780 19.76 $ FY 2014: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 102,100 0.1392 14.21 $ 5.55 28.1% The FY 2014 budgeted property tax revenue of $39,364,869 is based on an historical collection rate of 98.8%. The table below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2014. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2014 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 39,842,985 $ 39,364,869 Rate 98.8% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2012 actual, the FY 2013 forecast and the FY 2014 budgeted revenue for this category. In FY 2012, the District received a settlement payment for Spook Hill in the amount of $15M. FY 2013 Forecast and FY 2014 Budget reflect normal yearly operating revenues. Licenses and Permits Revenue $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $FY 2012 Actual 29 FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2005 196,239 2006 191,727 2007 199,736 2008 149,582 2009 133,384 2010 144,249 2011 156,110 2012 186,613 2013* 192,535 2014** 155,382 Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the * Forecast right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2014 payments in ** Budget lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of SRP’s increase in estimated net assessed value. Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2014 budget is reflective of receiving $5,688,318 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. Interest rates have continued to decline leading to a decrease in interest revenue, but in FY 2012 the District received $6M in accrued interest from the Spook Hill settlement. $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $FY 2012 Actual FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. 30 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfer $50 $45 $(Millions) $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 2012 2013 2014 Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The schedules in the following section list estimated beginning fund balances, estimated sources and uses for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances at the end of the upcoming fiscal year. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Presentation of fund balances has been adjusted in accordance with Statement 54 of the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). For budgeting purposes, fund balances exclude any amounts defined as “non-spendable,” such as fixed assets. District ending fund balances are usually classified as “restricted,” because all District fund balances are subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions. However, a negative ending balance would be classified as “unassigned.” Estimating Fund Balances The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for the upcoming fiscal year begins with audited actual fund balance information as of the end of the prior fiscal year, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning balances for the upcoming fiscal year are estimated by taking the audited ending balance for the prior fiscal year, adding to the forecasted sources for the current fiscal year, and subtracting the forecasted uses for the current fiscal year. 31 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST $ (22,218) $ (22,218) $ (22,218) $ $ $ 11,242 340,286 351,528 $ 349,000 349,000 $ 429,000 429,000 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 329,310 329,310 $ 349,000 349,000 $ Structural Balance $ 11,242 $ - $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ - $ $ Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: - $ $ (22,218) $ (22,218) $ FY 2014 ADOPTED - $ - $ $ 349,686 349,686 $ 75,000 75,000 429,000 429,000 $ 349,686 349,686 $ 75,000 75,000 - $ - $ - - $ $ $ (22,218) $ (22,218) $ - - The Flood Control Grants Fund receives grant revenue. Grant revenue is received as a reimbursement which results in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2013 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 31,777,747 $ 26,043,506 $ 26,043,506 $ 34,486,215 $ 46,446,536 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 57,911,719 57,911,719 $ 61,820,533 61,820,533 $ 42,539,699 42,539,699 $ 59,786,851 59,786,851 $ 22,582,402 22,582,402 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 55,203,260 55,203,260 $ 50,000,000 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 50,000,000 $ 47,826,530 47,826,530 $ 40,000,000 40,000,000 Accounting Adjustments $ 9 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 34,486,215 34,486,215 $ $ 37,864,039 37,864,039 $ $ 18,583,205 18,583,205 $ $ 46,446,536 46,446,536 $ $ 29,028,938 29,028,938 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 49,544,757 $ 33,642,377 $ 33,642,377 $ 59,844,252 $ 6,396,917 $ 86,606,934 784 86,607,718 $ 54,511,087 54,511,087 $ 54,511,087 54,511,087 $ 58,027,585 58,027,585 $ 40,233,894 40,233,894 $ $ $ 31,893,697 79,581,223 111,474,920 $ 31,934,409 14,696,402 46,630,811 $ $ $ $ $ 31,291,268 45,000,000 76,291,268 Structural Balance $ 55,315,666 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 33,775,369 54,098,533 87,873,902 $ 33,775,369 54,378,095 88,153,464 $ 20,735,718 $ 20,735,718 $ 26,133,888 $ 8,299,485 (16,955) $ - $ - $ - $ - 279,562 279,562 $ $ - $ $ 6,396,917 6,396,917 $ $ - Expenditures Revenue 59,844,252 59,844,252 $ $ Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Grants Fund (989) NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants US Geological Survey Grant 349,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 80,000 80,000 $ 429,000 $ 429,000 $ (429,000) $ (80,000) (349,000) (429,000) (80,000) (349,000) $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 C-69-13-001-G-00 Agenda Item: C-69-13-001-G-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants Grant Reconciliation 349,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants US Geological Survey Grant Grant Reconciliation $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 50,000,000 $ 7,722,000 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 50,000,000 $ 7,722,000 $ (50,000,000) $ (50,000,000) (7,722,000) (7,722,000) $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 7,886,000 7,886,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 7,886,000 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 33,775,369 $ 54,511,087 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 33,775,369 $ 54,511,087 FY 2014 Budget Target $ 33,775,369 $ 54,511,087 $ 59,218 59,218 (1,900,178) (1,900,178) - Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Request Over or Under Target Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Property Taxes Budget Balancing Budget Balancing Adjustment for Chairman's Budget Agenda Item: $ $ $ $ FY 2014 Tentative Budget $ $ $ $ 86,759 86,759 685,065 685,065 (15,049,017) (15,049,017) $ 31,934,409 $ -5.5% 40,233,894 -26.2% $ - $ 6,315 (6,315) - $ 31,934,409 $ -5.5% 40,233,894 -26.2% Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Salary Adjustments Flood District Performance Incentive Awards Non Recurring Flood Control District Budget Adjustment Flood Control Fund Transfer Reduction - $ $ 455,091 $ 455,091 (175,529) $ 19,105,305 (19,280,834) - $ 54,378,095 $ - $ (455,091) $ (455,091) (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) 175,529 $ (19,105,305) 19,280,834 - $ - $ - $ 22,628,214 $ 22,628,214 7,117,205 $ 7,117,205 (15,049,017) $ (15,049,017) - 14,696,402 $ - C-49-13-037-2-00 C-69-13-028-2-00 C-69-13-034-2-00 Agenda Item: C-49-13-037-2-00 $ $ C-69-13-028-2-00 C-69-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Budget Balancing Budget Balancing Adjustment for Chairman's Budget 54,098,533 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Salary Adjustments Flood District Performance Incentive Awards Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Flood Control District Budget Adjustment Flood Control Fund Transfer Reduction $ Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Eliminations Fund (900) Revenue Expenditures NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Flood Control Fund Transfer Reduction (54,098,533) $ 19,280,834 $ 19,280,834 19,280,834 19,280,834 $ (34,817,699) $ (34,817,699) $ 54,098,533 $ 54,098,533 (19,280,834) $ (19,280,834) 54,098,533 54,098,533 (19,280,834) (19,280,834) C-69-13-034-2-00 Agenda Item: $ C-69-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Budget Balancing Budget Balancing Adjustment for Chairman's Budget (54,098,533) $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Non Recurring Flood Control Fund Transfer Reduction $ $ - $ - $ (22,628,214) $ (22,628,214) (7,117,205) $ (7,117,205) 15,049,017 $ 15,049,017 (22,628,214) (22,628,214) (7,117,205) (7,117,205) 15,049,017 15,049,017 (14,696,402) $ (14,696,402) Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget $ 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by A.R.S. Title 48 in accordance with District Resolution 2010R008, which specifies the Board’s financial management directives for the District. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Readiness • Hazard Mitigation Need • Federal Cost Share • Municipal Cost Share The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 2 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2014, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS F699P - SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FCIPP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Project 3,186,973 $ 1,982,623 $ 1,550,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 9,550,000 $ 14,719,596 225,765,097 45,826,491 38,450,000 38,000,000 38,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 184,450,000 456,041,588 228,952,070 $ 47,809,114 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 37,000,000 $ 37,000,000 $ 194,000,000 $ 470,761,184 Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By June 30th, 2018, the District will address realized local structural flooding issues by participating in 100% of qualifying Small Projects Program submittals. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Result Measures: Measure Percent of Square Miles of Area that Receive Physical Protection Benefits from Projects in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program that are Completed in this Fiscal Year FY 2012 Actual 2.6% FY 2013 Forecast 10.2% FY 2014 Projected with Capital Improvements 0.7% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 610 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP. 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retardant Structure 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Upper Camelback Wash Improvements Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements Laveen Area Conveyance Channel th 27 Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin rd 43 Avenue and Baseline Road Basin Berneil Channel Modifications Rittenhouse Basin Chandler Heights Basin East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Tres Rios White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation McMicken Dam Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain Watson Drainage System Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet State Route 85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction Saddleback FRS Modifications Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation Cave Buttes Dam Modifications New River Dam Outlet Improvements Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain Ellsworth Road & McKellips Road Drainage System th Union Hills Drive/115 Avenue Drainage Improvements White Tanks FRS No.3 Outlet Channel Lower El Mirage Wash Basin Bullard Wash (Phase II) Loop 303 Drainage Improvements Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) th DRCC (107 Avenue to Agua Fria) th DRCC (75 Avenue to 107th Avenue) th Van Buren St. Channel (99 Avenue to Agua Fria River) th th Camelback Road Storm Drain – 59 Avenue to 75 Avenue 40 District Scheduled Completion 1 2 4 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 1 1 4 5 4 3 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 FY 2017 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2011 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 FY 2018 FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2009 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 FY 2013 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2015 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2017 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2017 FY 2012 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Improvement th District Scheduled Completion 5 5 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 3 3 5 2 1, 2 N/A Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP N/A th Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79 Avenue to 59 Avenue) Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback Road to Lafayette Boulevard) Lafayette Interceptor Drain & Outlet Circle K Park Detention Basin Ashbrook Wash Channelization East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tail water system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. The District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement for design and construction of the project; however, the project has been delayed due to a lack of City funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for FY 2018. Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation (027A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. Project construction is in progress, under the City’s lead, with the District providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2011A010. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Construction schedule is dependent upon City funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (117A) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel improved the Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility capable of containing and conveying a 100-year flood event in the Laveen area from 43rd Avenue to the Salt River – a distance of approximately 5.8 miles. An associated flood detention basin at 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue mitigates peak flood flows getting to the conveyance channel. The peak discharge at the outfall of the channel for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be 2,800 cubic feet per second. This project was constructed by a public-private partnership involving the Flood Control District, City of Phoenix, Maricopa County Department of Transportation and the Salt River Project. The channel and basin are grass-lined, and a concrete low-flow channel carries tail water to the Salt River. The District's project involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project rights-ofway condemnations. The project is being maintained by the City of Phoenix. 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin (117C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. Project design is in progress. 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road Basin (117D) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road. Project design is complete. Construction is scheduled to begin in summer 2013. Berneil Channel Modifications Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley The Berneil Channel is operated and maintained by the Town of Paradise Valley and generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at approximately the 66th Street alignment. The channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. The Town submitted a project for modification of the Berneil Channel to the District’s prioritization procedure, and the project was recommended. Ideally, a modification project would increase channel capacity to convey the 100-year event, but funding constraints may limit capacity improvements to address 10-year events. The Town has completed a preliminary project study. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is largely dependent upon the availability of Town and District funding. Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Construction of Rittenhouse Basin flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. Chandler Heights Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in at least five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as funding becomes available. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will purchase an easement on the completed basin site, fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations in the future. Project is dependent upon the need of earthen material by agencies/contractors and funding availability of the District. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Project Partner: N/A The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications; however, should the issues remain, the District would construct a concrete low flow channel along much of the length of the EMF. Tres Rios (126A) Project Partners: City of Phoenix, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila Rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands, open water marshes and riparian corridors, and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2,000,000 in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The levee design and construction occurred in three phases – from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and along 123rd to Southern Avenue. Construction of all three phases is complete. A Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway is in progress. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to continued FEMA coordination. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Due to the slowing of development in the area subsequent to the ADMP, the ADMP-recommended project now lacks a viable project partner for implementation. The District has initiated design of a storm drain outlet that will solely accomplish the District’s dam safety needs. Remaining regional flows may be addressed by a future ADMP update. Project design is complete and construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2017. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (then Soil Conservation Service). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004, and the District has entered into an IGA with NRCS to accomplish project construction. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is complete. Phase two will utilize a Construction Manager at Risk contract and is expected to begin in FY 2014. McMicken Dam Project (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately nine miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) that discharges to the Agua Fria River. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has pursued, and continues to pursue, federal funding assistance for this project. Should such funding be non-viable, the District may evaluate the potential of initiating a unilateral project. Design is in progress, and construction will be accomplished in multiple phases. Ongoing efforts are taking place to include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Since its construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The District completed a planning-level assessment of potential alternatives, including a modified dam, a channel/levee system and combinations of both providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Design is in progress, and construction will be accomplished in two phases. Both phases will utilize a Construction Manager at Risk contract. Phase 1 construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2014. Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Design is complete, and construction will be accomplished in multiple phases as Town funding becomes available. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to the planning for the project. Watson Drainage System (211B) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Town of Buckeye submitted the full ADMP-recommended plan to the District’s FY 2012 prioritization procedure, and the plan was recommended. The Watson System will be the first to be implemented. A pre-design effort is in progress. Project implementation is dependent upon a viable design solution and a cost share agreement between the District and the Town of Buckeye. Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet Project Partner: Town of Buckeye Skyline Wash originates in the White Tanks Mountains and results in alluvial fan-type flood flows downstream. Flows ultimately pond behind Buckeye FRS No.3 and subsequently drain to the Hassayampa River. The Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet Project is a variation on a recommendation identified by the District’s Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan. The project proposes to construct a basin at the apex of the alluvial fan floodplain and to convey flows through a combination of new channels and existing natural washes to the Buckeye FRS No.3. The project would result in elimination of the alluvial fan floodplain, impacting both existing properties and future development. A pre-design effort is in progress. Project implementation is dependent upon a viable design solution and a cost share agreement between the District and the Town of Buckeye. State Route 85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Oglesby System’s outfall would be constructed as a co-use Arizona Department of Transportation/District facility, built in conjunction with State Route 85 improvements from north of Baseline Road to the Gila River. ADOT 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District has tentatively agreed to this plan, which would require ADOT to upsize its planned freeway channel to accommodate regional flows in exchange for District cost share participation. The portion of the Oglesby System upstream of State Route 85 would be completed in the future – likely without the use of public funding – as the area develops. Project schedule is dependent upon ADOT’s State Route 85 improvement schedule and funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The City initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. With the city as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the selection of an outfall alignment south of McKellips Road by the SRPMIC. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is driven by city funding authorization under a future city bond election. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS), the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the Loop 202 San Tan Freeway. The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. The FFMA recommended rehabilitation of the structures which could include structural improvements to the dam or replacement of the dams with channels, basins or other flood control facilities. A study to propose an ultimate recommended solution for the structures is complete. Alternative selection is in progress and the rehabilitation plan is expected to begin in FY 2014. The District continues pursue federal cost share funding, with construction being accomplished in multiple phases. 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation (310B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate reservoir storage monitoring and warning procedures have been put in place for this sitespecific condition at the dam. Site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, are required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall rehabilitation or replacement. Construction of the interim dam safety measures is in progress. Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction (330A) Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS is a compact earth-fill dam which detains floodwater from the southwest side of the Big Horn Mountains, the Harquahala Plain and Saddle Mountain. The water is conveyed to the Harquahala Floodway and the Saddleback Diversion Channel and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 11.5 miles in length. Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides comprehensive rock mulch and hydroseed treatments for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon District funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: N/A The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for the initial construction. Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. A pre-study for modification alternatives is in progress. . 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation (343A) Project Partner: Town of Wickenburg The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. The project provides a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It also conveys the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction was completed in FY 2009. The project remains active pending FEMA acceptance of revised floodplain limits. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to continued FEMA coordination. Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: N/A Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Pre-design/alternatives development is in progress. New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370A) Project Partner: N/A The District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the New River Dam and associated works in 1985 as part of the New River and Phoenix City Streams Flood Control Project, providing enhanced flood protection for downstream Maricopa County residents, and the District operates and maintains the dam. Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. Design is complete. Construction schedule is dependent upon District funding availability. 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Design is complete. Construction schedule is dependent upon District and City funding availability. Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project is the fourth scheduled project in support of this ADMP and likely will include construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. A design concept study is complete. The project’s implementation schedule will depend upon District and City funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Union Hills Drive/115th Avenue Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Peoria, City of Surprise The project is located in the Lower Agua Fria watershed and is part of the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update (ADMPU). The study area extends from Beardsley Road to south of Bell Road between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River. The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will likely include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The design concept report is complete. Project implementation is awaiting execution of an intergovernmental agreement between the District and Cities of Peoria and Surprise. Project design is scheduled to begin in FY 2014. 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel (470F) Project Partner: N/A In FY 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No.4. This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No.3 to White Tanks FRS No.4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Bethany Home Road south to Interstate 10, the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. Project construction and the District's involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project rights-of-way condemnations. The project is being maintained by the District. Lower El Mirage Wash Basin (470K) Project Partner: City of El Mirage The Lower El Mirage Wash Basin is located in the Lower Agua Fria watershed and is included in the Loop 303/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP). The City of El Mirage identified flooding issues along Lower El Mirage Wash from just north of Cactus Road southeast through Pueblo El Mirage to the Agua Fria. The watershed for this study area is 12.25 square miles of the Lower Agua Fria watershed. The primary goal of the project is to develop a 100-year regional outfall for the area and mitigate flooding hazards in a delineated floodway/floodplain. The project consists of the completion of a detention basin in Lower El Mirage Wash, located at the southwest corner of Cactus Road and El Mirage Road, along with new culverts at El Mirage and Cactus Roads. Design is complete. Construction is expected to start summer 2013. Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear Bullard Wash is included within the State Route 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This storm water would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to Interstate 10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City of Goodyear funding and will likely be phased, with work being completed outside the five-year CIP. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for storm water management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a storm water collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303. Under the District’s agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the District will be responsible for project implementation from Van Buren Street south to the Gila River, while ADOT will be responsible for project implementation the project north of Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will precede construction of State Route 303. Design is complete. Utility relocation and rights-of-way acquisition are in progress. Construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2014. Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (470H) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, City of Glendale The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)/Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from State Route 303 to Reems Road and outlets to the existing Dysart Drain. The project serves both roadway drainage and regional flood control purposes, providing 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with MCDOT and the City of Glendale. Construction is in progress by MCDOT. The District is contributing cost share to the regional flood control features of the project under IGA FCD 2010A008. Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements (470L) Project Partner: Luke Air Force Base This project is an element generated from the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan Update. The project will mitigate an existing delineated flooding hazard on and adjacent to Luke Air Force Base (AFB). Approximately 250 acres of on-base facilities within existing flood zones will be removed from the floodplain which includes aircraft hangars, command posts, control tower, simulator complex, dorms and drinking wells. An additional 300 acres of commercial/industrial/agricultural property south of the base limits would be protected. 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The project includes rehabilitating and improving the existing storm drain system to collect and convey 100-year flows from sensitive areas on the base to the improved channel system, contain those flows within the channel system and provide a connection to the existing regional outfall. The District anticipates executing an intergovernmental agreement with Luke AFB for this project in FY 2014 and initiating design efforts. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, Town of Queen Creek The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2008-09, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The channel will collect and convey the 100-year flow to reduce flooding hazards to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. Under the project cost share agreement, the District will construct improvements upstream (west and northwest) of Ellsworth Road, and the Town of Queen Creek will construct improvements downstream of Ellsworth Road. The District will additionally construct a bridge over Sonoqui Wash at Riggs Road, with bridge costs to be reimbursed by MCDOT. Construction of the District’s reach is complete. Construction timing of the Town’s reach is dependent upon the availability of town funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: Pinal County The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of channelization has been completed. The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization will outfall to the second phase, which is being implemented by the District in partnership with the Town of Queen Creek. The third phase includes channelization of the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northeast to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is generally located in unincorporated Maricopa County and in Pinal County. The District anticipates partnering with Pinal County to share in features that serve to both improve the project’s ability to capture flows and to provide an outlet for future Pinal County improvements. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is in progress. 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) (480B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash from Recker Road to Higley Road to complete channel improvements that have already been accomplished upstream of Recker Road and downstream of Higley Road. This project replaces the existing wash with a natural desert 100-year capacity channel. Project design and construction are complete with the exception of landscaping, and the project is owned, operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active pending future completion of landscape and aesthetic enhancements by the Town. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the FY 2003 Prioritization Procedure and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. Project implementation is awaiting an IGA between the District and the City of Avondale. Advancement is largely dependent upon the availability of City and District funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will construct basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. Upon completion, the project will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. Design is complete. Construction is scheduled to start in FY 2018. 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Van Buren Street Channel - 99th Avenue to Agua Fria River (565D) Project Partner: City of Avondale This project, proposed by the City of Avondale, will provide a drainage outlet along Van Buren Street, conveying flows to the Agua Fria River. The Van Buren Street Channel Project will serve a developing area bounded by the Agua Fria River, 99th Avenue, Interstate 10, and Van Buren Street. In addition to alleviating an existing flooding hazard at the 99th Avenue and Van Buren Street intersection, the project would provide an outlet for Avondale’s future city center. The District is completing a design concept study, as the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. A pre-design effort is in progress. Pending the successful negotiation of an intergovernmental agreement with the City, final design is scheduled to begin during FY 2014. Camelback Road Storm Drain (59th Avenue to 75th Avenue) (620F) Project Partner: City of Glendale and City of Phoenix The Camelback Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the cities of Phoenix and Glendale. The project consists of a trunk line in Camelback Road with capacity for a 10-year storm event and lateral storm drains aiding in collection. The storm drain ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. Construction was completed during Fiscal Year 2012. The project remains active for the preparation of a Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway and subsequent FEMA approval. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to continued FEMA coordination. Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale The Bethany Home Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The City of Glendale is the lead agency for project design and construction. Design of the storm drain from approximately 71st Avenue to 79th Avenue is in progress by the City of Glendale, and construction timing will be dependent upon City and District funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The FY 2008 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project’s design involves the installation of various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. When combined with the complete downtown system recommended by the ADMP, this project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. Construction of the Fillmore Street components and of a Jefferson Street sub-phase is in progress by the City. The District is contributing 50% of the project costs under IGA FCD 2009A009. Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback to Lafayette) (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase, which was completed by the City of Phoenix, constructed the system outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvement Project. This third phase of the Arcadia Area Improvement project will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Arcadia Drive. This project will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. City funding for this future phase will likely require future bond elections, and schedule would be dependent on funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Lafayette Interceptor Drain and Outlet (625M) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase, which was completed by the City of Phoenix, constructed the system outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvement Project. This second phase of the Arcadia Area Improvement project is intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. The project is located along Lafayette Boulevard from just east of the 44th Street to Arcadia Drive and south on Arcadia Drive to the Arizona Canal. Additionally, major storm drains will be constructed along the west loop of North Village Drive and through “The Park” office complex located north of Lafayette Boulevard. The project is located within the City of Phoenix jurisdictional limits. Construction is in progress. 57 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Circle K Park Detention Basin Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District's Hohokam Area Drainage Master Study/Plan has identified drainage and flooding hazards in the south Phoenix area. Rainfall runoff from the South Mountain flows from the south to the north towards the Highline Canal. Approximately 0.65 square miles of watershed drains directly to the location of the Circle K Park and accumulates at that location. High volumes of floodwater will overtop the Highline Canal and proceed to pond in residential areas north of the canal. It is anticipated the project will construct a 35 acre-foot detention basin and provide a 10-year level of flood protection. Design and construction timing is dependent upon the execution of an intergovernmental agreement and availability of District and City funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Ashbrook Wash Channelization Project Partner: Town of Fountain Hills Ashbrook Wash is the largest watercourse within the Town of Fountain Hills, having a watershed area of 13.06 square miles. The District’s 1995 Floodplain Delineation Study for Fountain Hills showed deficiencies at the Golden Eagle Park Dam on Ashbrook Wash, due to overtopping and potential dam failure. Dam safety improvements were made to the Golden Eagle Park Dam in year 2000 to prevent its overtopping and failure in the 1/2 Probable Maximum Flood. However, those improvements increased the regulatory 100-year peak flow downstream. The project will provide channel improvements to convey increased flood flow from the upstream dam and prevent the flooding of 13 residential properties, at the 100-year storm, adjacent to this wash reach. Improvements include replacement of corrugated metal pipes with new reinforced concrete box culverts, channel excavation, flood walls and re-vegetation. Design and construction timing is dependent upon the execution of an intergovernmental agreement and availability of District and Town funding. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. Phase one of maintenance road improvements is complete. Future enhancements 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District are dependent upon District funding availability. The FY 2014 budget includes labor costs related to the continued planning and design of the project. Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve (FCPR) Project Partner: N/A The project reserve provides contingency funding for unforeseen schedule or cost estimate changes. Auxiliary Budget Line (FCIP) Project Partner: N/A Several District projects did not have accounting lines at the time of this document’s preparation and were placed under this function code. Funding/Cost Summary: Sources 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Project 218,646 $ 3,553,440 104,538 - 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 244,987 470L - 4701630 LUKE AFB FLOOD MITIG - 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 3,084,746 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 2,208,613 625M - 6250233 LAFAYETTE DRAIN 1,152,014 FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP $ 10,566,984 250,000 320,000 886,000 387,000 337,000 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 840,000 3,975,000 250,000 325,000 250,000 - - Project Total 290,000 $ 195,000 2,763,000 4,592,000 $ 200,000 - $ 5,760,000 6,500,000 250,000 150,000 377,000 $ 4,650,000 2,600,000 - - 2,500,000 - - 3,000,000 3,250,000 - - 886,000 1,450,987 1,350,000 1,350,000 - 753,000 4,224,746 188,000 $ 250,000 188,000 - 750,000 $ 250,000 $ 758,646 11,250,000 14,803,440 13,075,000 13,075,000 250,000 549,538 325,000 3,088,000 10,000 - - - - 10,000 2,218,613 900,000 - - - - 900,000 2,389,014 - - - 200,000 250,000 9,938,000 $ 438,000 $ - 7,886,000 $ 13,037,000 $ 59 200,000 950,000 $ 32,249,000 $ 47,407,984 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Cost by Sub-Project 022A - 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 027A - 0271032 UPPER CAMELBACK WASH 109A - 109 02 30 AGUA FRIA LEVEE IMP 117A - 1170831 LAVEEN AREA CONV CHAN 117C - 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN $ Flood Control District Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Project 3,049 $ 2,889,158 1,183,984 390,611 117D - 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 3,000 $ 3,614,078 3,000 23,866 290,588 5,000 $ 3,800,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 5,000 $ 5,000 10,000 5,000 $ 5,000 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 5,490,000 250,000 $ 10,000 - 275,000 $ 281,049 3,800,000 10,303,236 35,000 38,000 5,000 1,212,850 5,520,000 6,201,199 188,800 352,317 1,690,000 - - - - 1,690,000 2,231,117 121A - 1210332 RITTENHOUSE BASIN 8,723,992 1,557 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 8,760,549 121B - 1210333 CHANDLER HEIGHTS BASIN 3,039,006 3,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 3,077,006 126A - 1260131 TRES RIOS 1,596,039 90,043 25,000 - - - - 25,000 1,711,082 757,894 50,303 10,000 10,000 75,000 11,645,000 12,453,197 201A - 2010131 WHITE TANKS 4 OUTLET 201B - 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 7,249,508 684,165 2,875,000 9,920,000 8,070,000 955,182 1,522,009 1,445,000 1,520,000 10,960,000 207A - 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 1,583,917 873,709 6,430,000 9,320,000 8,820,000 211A - 2110331 DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE 1,023,147 3,000 75,000 10,000 53,206 603,297 640,000 6,500 1,825,960 1,081,308 202B - 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 211B - 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 265A - 2650130 GRANITE REEF WASH 331A - 3310130 SADDLEBACK FRS MOD 343A - 3430131 WICKENBURG DOWNTOWN - 7,650,000 - 20,865,000 28,798,673 - 19,375,000 21,852,191 - - 24,570,000 27,027,626 10,000 10,000 10,000 115,000 1,141,147 895,000 870,000 120,000 1,470,000 3,995,000 4,651,503 10,000 15,000 15,000 2,550,000 1,620,000 4,210,000 4,216,500 613,468 4,625,705 900,000 570,000 900,000 - 910,000 - 930,000 - 9,400,000 - 13,040,000 570,000 15,479,428 6,277,013 - 310A - 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 310B - 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 3,900,000 5,450,000 996,006 171,571 15,000 - - - - 15,000 1,182,577 10,429,670 2,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 10,466,670 4,880,000 160,000 7,025,000 8,214,802 350B - 3500130 CAVE BUTTES DAM MOD 855,164 334,638 650,000 685,000 650,000 370A - 3700130 NEW RIVER DAM OUTLET 9,696 3,928 5,000 5,000 945,000 420D - 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 715,628 141,707 5,000 5,000 420E - 4200531 ELLSWORTH MCKELLIPS 122,392 2,837 5,000 4,066 120,833 790,000 450G - 4500731 115TH UNION HILLS DR 470D - 4701331 BULLARD WASH PH II - - 955,000 968,624 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 892,335 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 925,000 4,310,000 - - 5,000 10,000 10,000 - - - 160,229 6,149,899 35,000 134,200 23,990,000 37,093,629 - 5,000 28,164,083 - 120,000 5,002,478 950,000 1,847,782 3,205,202 96,085 3,115 5,000 5,000 470E - 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 11,481,989 1,621,640 12,430,000 11,560,000 470F - 4700432 WHITE TANKS 3 OUTLET 24,568,781 3,590,302 5,000 - - - 470H - 4701531 NORTHERN PKWY PH I 2,229,777 2,652,701 120,000 - - - 30,854 866,928 950,000 - - - - 470K - 4701132 LOWER EL MIRAGE WASH 35,000 6,025,000 5,202 460,000 420,000 60,000 600,000 1,660,000 3,200,000 450,841 1,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 486,841 480C - 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 17,904,969 759,031 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 15,000 40,000 18,704,000 480E - 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 3,503,918 9,072,260 690,000 5,000 250,000 7,310,000 8,255,000 20,831,178 89,793 3,792 10,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 15,000 45,000 138,585 565C - 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 5,842,805 77,117 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,150,000 10,175,000 16,094,922 620F - 6200333 CAMELBACK 59TH TO 75TH 13,147,995 68,289 25,000 - - - - 25,000 13,241,284 11,098 3,070 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 49,168 4,202,122 1,418,289 1,315,000 - - - - 1,315,000 6,935,411 470L - 4701630 LUKE AFB FLOOD MITIG - 480B - 4800531 QUEEN CK RKR TO HIGLEY 565B - 5650432 DRCC AVONDALE 620G - 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH 625J - 6250130 DOWNTOWN PHOENIX PH I 625L - 6250232 ARCADIA DR STRM DRAN - - 1,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 36,000 8,700,881 95,000 - - - - 95,000 9,758,781 625M - 6250233 LAFAYETTE DRAIN 962,900 698A - 6981030 EMF MAINT RD IMP 487,467 3,755 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 526,222 - 154,044 335,000 885,000 1,205,000 1,860,000 580,000 4,865,000 5,019,044 - 2,564,000 2,000,000 840,000 765,000 1,750,000 1,910,000 7,265,000 9,829,000 FCIP - FLOOD CONTROL CIP FCPR - PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD Project Total $ 130,688,777 $ 45,707,535 $ 38,450,000 $ 38,000,000 $ 38,000,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 184,450,000 $ 360,846,312 Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects th 60 Street & Hollyhock Street Storm Drain Project th 25 Street & Illini Street Storm Drain Project th 28 Street & East Polk Street Storm Drain Project nd 22 Street & Clarendon Avenue Storm Drain Project Almeria Road & Willetta Street Storm Drain Project th 7121 East 5 Street Drainage Improvement Project District Scheduled Completion All 2 5 5 3 5 2 N/A FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects (F699) Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. 60th Street & Hollyhock Street Storm Drain Project (69A1) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring first among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 25th Street & Illini Street Storm Drain Project (69A2) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring second among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of four residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 28th Street & East Polk Street Storm Drain Project (69A3) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring fifth among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 22nd Street and Clarendon Avenue Storm Drain Project (69A4) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring third among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of seven residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Almeria Road & Willetta Street Storm Drain Project (69A5) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring fourth among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 7121 East 5th Street Drainage Improvement Project (69A7) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2014. The project was recommended, scoring seventh among thirteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of one commercial property and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Fund/Costing Summary: Cost by Sub-Project 69A1 - 6991430 60TH ST HOLLYHOCK SD 69A2 - 6991431 25TH ST ILLINI ST SD 69A3 - 6991432 28TH ST E POLK ST SD 69A4 - 6991433 22ND ST CLARENDON SD 69A5 - 6991434 ALMERIA WILLETTA SD Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Project $ - 69A7 - 6991436 7121 E 5TH ST DI - F699 - SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE PRGM - Project Total - $ - $ 369,000 $ 369,000 $ 253,000 $ 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 32,000 1,550,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 62 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 253,000 $ 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 8,032,000 8,401,000 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 9,550,000 $ 9,919,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Approve the Library District Fiscal Year 2014 Adopted Budget in the amount of $25,525,017 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Library District. Approve the Adopted Maricopa County Library District property tax levy for Fiscal Year 2014, which is a reduction of $2,808,719 from the FY 2013 Library District property tax levy. Approve the attached Executive Summary. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2014 Adopted Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guideline to conform with the budget. 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Andy Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Steve Chucri, District 2 Denny Barney, District 1 Clint Hickman, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District revenue budget for FY 2014 is $19,424,499 and expenditure budget for FY 2014 is $25,525,017. The tax levy will decrease to $14,116,305 for FY 2014. The tax rate will decrease to $0.0438 per $100 of assessed value. The net assessed value is decreasing by $2,171,448,906 from FY 2013 to FY 2014. Due to property tax revenue decreasing by a large percentage, (16.6%) the reciprocal borrowing program with cities will continue being funded through non recurring sources as funding is available. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2012 through FY 2014 $22,000,000 Use of the District library facilities continues to grow for traditional services as well as electronic services, which allows the library user to download music and books. The District is working on providing downloadable movies as well. $20,000,000 $18,935,258 $18,000,000 $16,721,924 $16,000,000 $13,946,909 $14,000,000 The FY 2014 budget also includes onetime expenditure authority that will allow the District to convert the last two branches to the Deweyless System. $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2012 Actual I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Andy Kunasek Chairman, Board of Directors Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 65 FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Adopted Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Early Literacy Stations were a perfect size, great fun and safe way to explore on the computer. Story time and book discussions abound at all ages. 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Idamarie C. Flaherty, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to reading, exploring and discovering for all so they can be lifelong learners. Vision Maricopa County Library District aspires to be the vibrant community front porch, a destination where people exchange ideas, gain access, foster creativity and pursue knowledge. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: Customer satisfaction was 86% in FY 2013 with the library's collection of books and other materials. The FY 2014 Customer Satisfaction Survey will commence in April 2014. Individual Empowerment By June 30, 2016 there will be a 30% usage increase of electronic materials. Status: This is a new goal for FY 2014, and will be a baseline measuring year. Department Specific By June 30, 2015, there will be a 10% increase in municipal partnerships. Status: This is a new goal for FY 2014, and will be a baseline measuring year. 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE $ BEGINNING FUND BALANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,939,263 $ 12,285,661 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING $ 13,946,909 $ PROPERTY TAXES PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 296,957 3,912,806 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 20,952 OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES 684,670 FINES & FORFEITS INTEREST EARNINGS 72,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 190,205 TRANSFERS IN 900,000 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 20,024,499 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ SUBTOTAL - $ - $ 15,224,924 ELIMINATIONS $ $ 15,224,924 - $ (900,000) (900,000) $ 13,946,909 296,957 3,912,806 20,952 684,670 72,000 190,205 19,124,499 - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 3,504,810 (3,504,810) 3,804,810 $ (3,504,810) $ 200,000 100,000 300,000 13,946,909 $ 296,957 3,912,806 20,952 684,670 72,000 190,205 900,000 20,024,499 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 3,504,810 3,804,810 $ - $ - $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 23,829,309 $ - $ 23,829,309 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 11,080,146 $ 6,566,114 SUPPLIES SERVICES 4,278,757 OTHER FINANCING USES 900,000 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 22,825,017 $ - $ - $ 11,080,146 $ 6,566,114 4,278,757 900,000 22,825,017 $ $ NON-RECURRING SUPPLIES $ SERVICES OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 2,000,000 $ 1,600,000 343,555 3,943,555 $ TOTAL USES $ 26,768,572 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ (2,800,518) $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ - $ 68 - $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ $ 19,424,499 - $ (900,000) (900,000) $ 11,080,146 6,566,114 4,278,757 21,925,017 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,600,000 (3,504,810) 3,504,810 7,104,810 $ (3,504,810) $ 2,000,000 1,600,000 3,600,000 29,929,827 $ (4,404,810) $ (4,404,810) - $ (2,800,518) $ $ 9,124,406 $ 9,124,406 - TOTAL $ 25,525,017 - $ (2,800,518) - $ 9,124,406 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 650 244 242 246 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED $ 18,362,225 14,714,918 $ 33,077,143 $ 18,362,225 14,784,150 $ 33,146,375 $ $ $ - $ 4,515,096 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ $ 169,912 FY 2014 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 18,309,921 $ 52,304 3,400,000 11,384,150 $ 21,709,921 $ 11,436,454 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ 200,000 $ 4,515,096 $ 343,555 4,858,651 $ (30,088) 887,431 887,431 $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) $ (900,000) $ (499,725) (11,795,904) (11,494,462) (3,504,810) (11,150,907) $ (13,195,629) $ (12,894,187) $ (4,404,810) $ (11,650,632) $ 25,627,596 69 $ 26,168,182 $ 25,525,017 $ 643,165 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $25,525,017 Fund Balance $6,100,518 24% Property Taxes $13,946,909 55% Intergovernmental & Grants $4,430,715 17% Miscellaneous & Interest $362,205 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $684,670 3% Information Technology $2,022,269 8% Uses of Funds $25,525,017 Administrative Services $3,035,999 12% Public Library Service $20,466,749 80% 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2012 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 4,783,188 $ 4,783,188 $ 4,311,691 $ 4,311,691 $ 4,494,861 $ 4,494,861 $ 4,564,279 $ 4,564,279 $ 5,087,681 $ 5,087,681 $ FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 88,799 $ 88,799 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 19,499,007 $ 19,499,007 $ 17,042,276 $ 17,042,276 $ 17,098,250 $ 17,098,250 $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,305,824 $ 592,820 592,820 13.2% 13.2% 72,000 $ 72,000 $ (28,000) (28,000) -28.0% -28.0% 17,054,767 $ 17,054,767 $ 14,243,866 $ 14,243,866 $ (2,854,384) (2,854,384) -16.7% -16.7% 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ 20,952 $ (2,677) (2,677) -11.3% -11.3% 21,477,596 $ 21,716,740 $ 21,728,797 $ 19,424,499 $ (2,292,241) -10.6% 18,840,498 $ 18,840,498 $ 20,504,060 $ 20,504,060 $ 20,742,713 $ 20,742,713 $ 21,198,528 $ 21,198,528 $ 15,734,217 $ 4,705,600 20,439,817 $ 5,008,496 (4,705,600) 302,896 24.1% N/A 1.5% 119,469 $ 338,172 240,702 848,910 1,547,253 $ 124,273 $ 464,345 272,294 672,808 1,533,720 $ 124,273 $ 464,345 522,436 668,625 1,779,679 $ 148,093 $ 346,810 247,426 655,871 1,398,200 $ 124,986 $ 466,088 284,787 976,142 1,852,003 $ (713) (1,743) 237,649 (307,517) (72,324) -0.6% -0.4% 45.5% -46.0% -4.1% 914,342 $ 41,579 955,921 $ 952,741 $ 62,467 1,015,208 $ 952,741 $ 55,974 62,467 1,071,182 $ 952,737 $ 62,460 1,015,197 $ 1,085,301 $ 36,228 89,399 1,210,928 $ (132,560) 19,746 (26,932) (139,746) -13.9% 35.3% -43.1% -13.0% $ 291,190 $ 359,899 362,393 148,366 1,161,848 $ 487,318 $ 829,593 1,081,392 176,305 2,574,608 $ 487,318 $ 829,593 1,081,392 176,305 2,574,608 $ 355,433 $ 484,206 1,065,484 180,483 2,085,606 $ 474,631 $ 680,593 689,544 177,501 2,022,269 $ 12,687 149,000 391,848 (1,196) 552,339 2.6% 18.0% 36.2% -0.7% 21.5% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 22,505,520 $ 25,627,596 $ 26,168,182 $ 25,697,531 $ 25,525,017 $ 643,165 USES MAPC - MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH MUNI - SUPPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 2.5% Sources and Uses by Category FY 2012 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ $ 16,721,924 $ 16,721,924 $ 16,721,924 16,721,924 FY 2013 FORECAST $ $ $ $ $ $ (2,775,015) (2,775,015) -16.6% -16.6% 200,000 $ 296,957 496,957 $ 100,465 (23,395) 77,070 100.9% -7.3% 18.4% 3,912,806 $ 20,952 3,933,758 $ 506,355 (2,677) 503,678 14.9% -11.3% 14.7% $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 764,314 $ 764,314 $ 716,270 716,270 $ $ 716,270 $ 716,270 $ 725,266 $ 725,266 $ 684,670 684,670 $ $ (31,600) (31,600) -4.4% -4.4% $ 145,799 $ 445,411 591,210 $ 100,000 188,970 288,970 $ 100,000 $ 328,579 428,579 $ 92,631 $ 306,231 398,862 $ 72,000 290,205 362,205 $ $ (28,000) (38,374) (66,374) -28.0% -11.7% -15.5% $ $ $ 3,406,451 23,629 3,430,080 $ $ 142,906 $ 329,011 471,917 $ 13,946,909 13,946,909 REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 3,406,451 23,629 3,430,080 3,373,692 23,629 3,397,321 $ 99,535 $ 320,352 419,887 $ 16,721,924 16,721,924 FY 2014 ADOPTED $ SUBTOTAL $ 290,327 $ 327,394 617,721 $ FY 2013 REVISED 320,352 320,352 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS 18,935,258 18,935,258 FY 2013 ADOPTED 3,389,876 20,952 3,410,828 $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 24,305,824 $ 21,477,596 $ 21,716,740 $ 21,728,797 $ 19,424,499 $ (2,292,241) -10.6% TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,305,824 $ 21,477,596 $ 21,716,740 $ 21,728,797 $ 19,424,499 $ (2,292,241) -10.6% 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 7,514,831 $ 378,811 427 2,794,225 260 (12,800) 12,800 10,688,554 $ 7,127,653 $ 1,237,726 2,954,391 52,775 (12,800) 12,800 11,372,545 $ 7,052,101 $ 1,303,612 2,910,842 356,132 (12,800) 12,800 11,622,687 $ 6,921,369 $ 1,209,621 6,379 2,930,226 239,270 (12,800) 11,734 11,305,799 $ 6,808,852 $ 1,197,315 2,876,666 133,523 (12,800) 91,442 11,094,998 $ 5,405,910 $ 10,726 1,003,064 6,419,700 $ 7,403,645 $ 21,000 892,423 8,317,068 $ 7,549,919 $ 21,000 920,723 8,491,642 $ 7,584,641 $ 20,578 822,350 8,427,569 $ 8,144,382 $ 21,000 400,000 732 8,566,114 $ (594,463) 520,723 (732) (74,472) -7.9% 0.0% 56.6% N/A -0.9% 686,388 $ 582,608 713,180 2,219,618 44,573 24,201 261,359 596,530 5,128,457 $ 892,775 $ 723,518 660,770 989,265 1,649,150 87,300 246,315 688,890 5,937,983 $ 942,386 $ 723,518 669,445 2,589,265 49,150 87,300 246,315 688,890 5,996,269 $ 836,100 $ 605,662 767,729 1,001,750 294 40,719 1,651,090 229,237 716,948 5,849,529 $ 660,493 $ 671,619 691,171 2,733,905 50,000 87,900 246,225 722,136 456 5,863,905 $ 281,893 51,899 (21,726) (144,640) (850) (600) 90 (33,246) (456) 132,364 29.9% 7.2% -3.2% -5.6% N/A -1.7% -0.7% 0.0% -4.8% N/A 2.2% $ 268,108 $ 701 268,809 $ - $ - $ 57,584 $ 57,584 $ 114,634 $ 114,634 $ - $ - $ 57,584 57,584 100.0% N/A 100.0% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 22,505,520 $ 25,627,596 $ 26,168,182 $ 25,697,531 $ 25,525,017 $ 643,165 2.5% TOTAL USES $ 22,505,520 $ 25,627,596 $ 26,168,182 $ 25,697,531 $ 25,525,017 $ 643,165 2.5% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 243,249 3.4% 106,297 8.2% N/A 34,176 1.2% 222,609 62.5% 0.0% (78,642) -614.4% 527,689 4.5% Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2012 ACTUAL FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 90,556 $ 199,771 290,327 $ - $ - $ - $ 169,912 169,912 $ - $ 142,906 142,906 $ - $ 200,000 200,000 $ SOURCES $ 20,874,166 $ 45,481 20,919,647 $ 18,362,225 $ 1,230,986 19,593,211 $ 18,362,225 $ 1,244,244 19,606,469 $ 18,483,263 $ 1,230,986 19,714,249 $ 15,509,403 $ 3,604,810 19,114,213 $ $ SOURCES $ 3,035,016 $ 3,035,016 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,448,796 $ 4,448,796 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ $ 58,009 $ 2,825 60,834 $ - $ 10,564,918 10,564,918 $ - $ 10,319,450 10,319,450 $ 3,832 $ 10,564,918 10,568,750 $ - $ - $ SOURCES $ - $ - $ (1,399,725) $ (11,795,904) (13,195,629) $ (1,399,725) $ (11,494,462) (12,894,187) $ (1,350,000) $ (11,795,904) (13,145,904) $ (900,000) $ (3,504,810) (4,404,810) $ 499,725 7,989,652 8,489,377 -35.7% -69.5% -65.8% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,057,747 $ 248,077 $ 24,305,824 $ 21,477,596 $ - $ 21,477,596 $ 21,477,596 $ 239,144 $ 21,716,740 $ 21,585,891 $ 142,906 $ 21,728,797 $ 19,124,499 $ 300,000 $ 19,424,499 $ (2,353,097) 60,856 (2,292,241) -11.0% 25.4% -10.6% $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL $ SOURCES $ $ 72 30,088 30,088 (2,852,822) 2,360,566 (492,256) - N/A 17.7% 17.7% -15.5% 189.7% -2.5% 0.0% 0.0% N/A (10,319,450) -100.0% (10,319,450) -100.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON-RECURRING FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 290,327 $ 290,327 $ - $ - $ 169,912 $ 169,912 $ 142,906 $ 142,906 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ $ 18,805,806 $ 717,926 19,523,732 $ 18,362,225 $ 14,714,918 33,077,143 $ 18,362,225 $ 14,784,150 33,146,375 $ 18,306,057 $ 14,714,690 33,020,747 $ 18,309,921 $ 3,400,000 21,709,921 $ 52,304 11,384,150 11,436,454 0.3% 77.0% 34.5% 2,691,462 $ (1) 2,691,461 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ 4,448,796 $ 1,230,986 5,679,782 $ 4,515,096 $ 343,555 4,858,651 $ 887,431 887,431 0.0% 72.1% 15.4% - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 $ (3,161,255) (3,161,255) N/A N/A 21,497,268 $ 1,008,252 $ 22,505,520 $ 21,477,596 $ 4,150,000 $ 25,627,596 $ 21,477,596 $ 4,690,586 $ 26,168,182 $ 21,404,853 $ 4,292,678 $ 25,697,531 $ 21,925,017 $ 3,600,000 $ 25,525,017 $ (447,421) 1,090,586 643,165 -2.1% 23.3% 2.5% 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ (30,088) (30,088) -17.7% -17.7% Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 2,630,711 $ 2,574,737 $ 2,580,986 $ Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Non-Recurring $ 1,230,986 $ 1,175,012 $ 1,230,986 $ 3,504,810 4,404,810 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 1,230,986 $ 1,175,012 $ 1,230,986 $ 3,504,810 Non-Recurring $ 1,230,986 $ 1,175,012 $ 1,230,986 $ 3,504,810 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 $ 10,564,918 $ 10,319,450 $ 10,564,918 $ - CAPITAL PROJECTS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 10,564,918 $ 10,319,450 $ 10,564,918 $ - 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ 10,564,918 $ 10,319,450 $ 10,564,918 $ - Non-Recurring $ 10,564,918 $ 10,319,450 $ 10,564,918 $ - $ 13,195,629 $ 12,894,187 $ 13,145,904 $ 4,404,810 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Non-Recurring $ 11,795,904 $ 11,494,462 $ 11,795,904 $ 3,504,810 ELIMINATIONS $ (13,195,629) $ (12,894,187) $ (13,145,904) $ (4,404,810) Operating $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) $ (1,350,000) $ (900,000) Non-Recurring $ (11,795,904) $ (11,494,462) $ (11,795,904) $ (3,504,810) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 73 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 13,195,629 $ 12,894,187 $ 13,145,904 $ 1,243,555 Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Non-Recurring $ 11,795,904 $ 11,494,462 $ 11,795,904 $ 343,555 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 11,964,643 $ 11,719,175 $ 11,914,918 $ 900,000 Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Non-Recurring $ 10,564,918 $ 10,319,450 $ 10,564,918 $ - 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 1,230,986 $ 1,175,012 $ 1,230,986 $ 343,555 Non-Recurring $ 1,230,986 $ 1,175,012 $ 1,230,986 $ 343,555 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 CAPITAL PROJECTS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 $ 13,195,629 $ 12,894,187 $ 13,145,904 $ 4,404,810 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 1,399,725 $ 1,399,725 $ 1,350,000 $ 900,000 Non-Recurring $ 11,795,904 $ 11,494,462 $ 11,795,904 $ 3,504,810 ELIMINATIONS $ (13,195,629) $ (12,894,187) $ (13,145,904) $ (4,404,810) Operating $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) $ (1,350,000) $ (900,000) Non-Recurring $ (11,795,904) $ (11,494,462) $ (11,795,904) $ (3,504,810) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER DESKTOP SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAT ACCESS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 14.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 14.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 13.00 (1.00) (1.00) 0.0% (20.0%) 0.0% 0.0% (7.1%) 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 14.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 141.73 141.73 170.73 141.73 141.73 170.73 139.73 139.73 167.73 142.73 142.73 170.73 137.73 137.73 164.73 (2.00) (2.00) (3.00) (1.4%) (1.4%) (1.8%) 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Department Facilities Planner Deputy Director Deputy Director - Library Director - Library Executive Assistant Finance Manager Finance Support Supervisor Financial Supervisor - Dept Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Manager Human Resources Specialist Human Resources Supervisor IT Division Manager IT Services Supv Librarian Library Administrator Library Clerk Library Coordinator Library Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized PC/LAN Tech Support Systems Admin & Analysis Supv Systems/Network Administrator Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer-Sr/Ld Department Total FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 49.49 49.49 47.49 49.49 48.49 1.00 2.1% 12.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.0% 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 0.0% 22.00 22.00 22.00 23.00 18.00 (4.00) (18.2%) 11.00 12.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 170.73 170.73 167.73 170.73 164.73 (3.00) (1.8% ) Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Department Total FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 139.73 119.73 118.73 120.73 117.73 (1.00) (0.8%) 31.00 51.00 49.00 50.00 47.00 (2.00) (4.1%) 170.73 170.73 167.73 170.73 164.73 (3.00) (1.8% ) Staffing Variance Analysis There has been a decrease in staffing caused by the conclusion of the project eliminating the Dewey Decimal system. General Adjustments Library District Fund (244) • Increase Regular Benefits by $21,847 for the changes in retirement contribution rates. • The FY 2014 Operating budget includes a decrease in revenue of $2,852,822 due to a decrease in Property Tax and Other Revenue. 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget • Library District The FY 2014 Non Recurring Non Project expenditure budget for $3,400,000 includes $1,600,000 for the Reciprocal Borrowing Program, $1,000,000 for the Materials Assistance Program, $700,000 for Information and Communications Technology upgrades and $100,000 Donations. Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) • Increase Regular Benefits by $7,207 for the changes in retirement contribution rates. Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program FY 2012 ACTUAL 49.5% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 47.6% 47.6% FY 2014 ADOPTED 48.9% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 1.3% 2.7% 87.9% 87.3% 87.3% 88.0% 0.7% 0.8% 92.8% 91.4% 91.4% 91.3% -0.0% -0.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: Not mandated. 76 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Efficiency Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Number of items circulated Number of programs and activities provided Number of digital materials accessed Number of website visits Number of items requested to be circulated Number of digital materials requested to be accessed Total expenditure per item circulated Total expenditure per digital material accessed Library District FY 2012 ACTUAL 49.5% $ FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 47.6% 47.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 1.3% 2.7% FY 2014 ADOPTED 48.9% 87.9% 87.3% 87.3% 88.0% 0.7% 0.8% 92.8% 91.4% 91.4% 91.3% (0.0%) -0.0% 7,802,654 3,856 N/A N/A 8,000,000 N/A 8,000,000 2,800 N/A N/A 8,000,000 N/A 7,763,738 3,650 N/A N/A 7,904,000 N/A (472,524) 1,200 N/A N/A N/A -5.9% 42.9% N/A N/A 0.0% N/A 0.50 N/A 19.4% N/A 2.41 $ N/A 2.59 $ N/A 2.73 $ N/A $ 7,527,476 4,000 720,000 3,480,000 8,000,000 720,000 2.09 21.85 $ Revenue 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 199,771 1,499,768 3,035,016 48,633 $ 4,783,188 $ 169,912 $ 142,906 $ 200,000 $ 30,088 2,440,564 2,553,563 1,272,585 (1,167,979) 4,515,096 4,448,796 4,515,096 (2,630,711) (2,580,986) (900,000) 1,730,711 $ 4,494,861 $ 4,564,279 $ 5,087,681 $ 592,820 17.7% -47.9% 0.0% N/A -65.8% 13.2% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES 290,327 15,858,710 2,691,461 $ 18,840,498 169,912 $ 142,906 $ 200,000 $ (30,088) 17,513,404 17,956,826 11,955,349 5,558,055 5,690,108 5,679,782 4,478,868 1,211,240 (2,630,711) (2,580,986) (900,000) (1,730,711) $ 20,742,713 $ 21,198,528 $ 15,734,217 $ 5,008,496 -17.7% 31.7% 21.3% 65.8% 24.1% Expenditure $ $ Activity Narrative: The Library District Fund (244) has a decrease in revenues due to a decline of miscellaneous revenue, interest revenue, and a one-time transfer in FY 2013 of $1,230,986 from the Library Intergovernmental Fund (246), which has a similar reduction in expenditures. Additionally, the Library District Fund (244) expenditures decreased due to a change in personnel savings and a reclassification of supplies to the new Municipalities Services Activity. The Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) has an increase in revenues due to the City of Surprise paying for 50% of the operating costs of the Northwest Regional Library and transfer of $900,000 from the Library District Fund (244) for the District’s portion of the FY 2014 Northwest Regional Library operations. Support for Municipalities Services Activity The Municipalities Services Activity purpose is to provide a better library service to Maricopa County Residents through implementation of our Polaris Program, consulting services and partnerships with cities and towns. Mandates: Not mandated. 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of Summer Reading Program Participants completing the program Percent of affiliate staff reporting satisfaction with Summer Reading Program Number of Summer Reading Program participants Number of materials provided through Materials Assistance Program Number of materials requested to be provided through Materials Assistance Program Library District FY 2012 ACTUAL N/A Number of people requesting Summer Reading Program participation Total expenditure per Summer Reading Program participant FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 2014 ADOPTED 40.0% 90.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % N/A N/A N/A N/A 80,000 N/A N/A N/A 32,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 32,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 80,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 58.82 N/A N/A $ 4,705,600 $ 4,705,600 $ (4,705,600) $ (4,705,600) N/A N/A Expenditure 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT TOTAL USES $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - Activity Narrative: The FY 2014 budget supports the Department in meeting 100% of demand for services. This Activity includes services for support of the Intergovernmental Reciprocal Borrowing Program and Materials Assistance Program. These programs provide essential resources to libraries in the cities and towns of Maricopa County. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate in FY 2008. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last ten fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2014. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2013 to FY 2014 due to the decline in property values county-wide and a tax rate reduction. The tax rate will decrease to $0.0438 per $100 of assessed value. 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Fiscal Year Tax Levy (Thousands) N.A.V.) 2004 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 2005 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 2006 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 2007 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 2008 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 2009 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 2010 57,984,051 0.0353 20,468,370 2011 49,707,952 0.0412 20,479,676 2012 38,760,297 0.0492 19,070,066 2013 34,400,455 0.0492 16,925,024 2014 32,229,007 0.0438 14,116,305 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Fiscal Year The FY 2014 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $14,116,305, a change from the FY 2013 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years. FY 2014 PROPERTY TAX LEVY LIBRARY DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2014 Adopted FY 2013 Adopted Variance $ 32,229,006,810 $ $ 34,400,455,716 $ $ (2,171,448,906) $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1cent Levy 676,321,912 $ 32,905,328,722 $ 676,321,912 $ 35,076,777,628 $ - $ (2,171,448,906) $ 79 3,290,533 $ 3,507,678 $ (217,145) $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.0438 $ 0.0492 $ (0) $ 14,116,305 $ 16,925,024 $ (2,808,719) $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 296,957 $ 332,750 $ (35,793) $ 14,413,262 17,257,774 (2,844,512) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Levy Limit FY 2014 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2014 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 25,009,709 0.0776 FY 2014 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 14,116,305 0.0438 Amount Under Limit: $ 10,893,404 43.6% 0.0338 FY 2014 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2014 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 17,274,748 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0536 FY 2014 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 14,116,305 0.0438 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 3,158,443 0.0098 FY 2014 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 102,100 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 5.47 4.47 1.00 80 $ 18.3% 18.3% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2014 vs. FY 2013 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2013: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2014: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 111,000 0.0492 5.46 $ $ $ 102,100 0.0438 4.47 $ 0.99 18.1% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2014 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 98.8% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2014. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2014 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 14,116,305 $ 13,946,909 Rate 98.8% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. 81 SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2005 281,442 2006 270,953 2007 246,032 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011 269,405 2012 327,394 2013* 329,011 2014** 296,957 * Forecast ** Adopted Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 967,206 $ 901,768 491,470 941,470 26,200 26,200 1,905,000 2,043,368 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library TOTAL $3,389,876 $3,912,806 Fines and Forfeits The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2012 and the anticipated amount for FY 2013 and the budget for FY 2014. Fines and Forfeits $780,000 Miscellaneous Revenue $760,000 $740,000 $720,000 The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2012 through the FY 2014 budget. $700,000 $680,000 $660,000 $640,000 FY 2012 Actual FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Adopted Miscellaneous Revenue $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $FY 2012 Actual 82 FY 2013 Forecast FY 2014 Adopted Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted.” Fund Balance Summary Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FUND BALANCE SUMMARY LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS (242) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ $ $ 90,556 199,771 290,327 $ $ - Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ 290,327 290,327 $ $ Structural Balance $ 90,556 $ FY 2013 FORECAST $ $ 169,912 169,912 - $ $ - $ FY 2014 ADOPTED $ $ 142,906 142,906 $ 200,000 200,000 169,912 169,912 $ $ 142,906 142,906 $ $ 200,000 200,000 - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 14,506,287 $ 13,483,932 $ 13,483,932 $ 15,902,206 $ 2,595,708 $ 20,874,166 45,481 20,919,647 $ 18,362,225 1,230,986 19,593,211 $ 18,362,225 1,244,244 19,606,469 $ 18,483,263 1,230,986 19,714,249 $ 15,509,403 3,604,810 19,114,213 $ $ 18,306,057 14,714,690 33,020,747 $ $ 18,362,225 14,784,150 33,146,375 $ $ 18,362,225 14,714,918 33,077,143 $ $ 18,805,806 717,926 19,523,732 $ 18,309,921 3,400,000 21,709,921 Structural Balance $ 2,068,360 $ - $ - $ 177,206 $ (2,800,518) Accounting Adjustments $ 4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,902,206 15,902,206 $ - $ - $ (55,974) (55,974) $ 2,595,708 2,595,708 $ - Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $ 83 $ $ $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 1,230,986 $ 1,230,986 $ 1,230,986 $ 1,574,541 $ 343,555 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 3,035,016 3,035,016 $ $ 4,515,096 4,515,096 $ $ 4,515,096 4,515,096 $ $ 4,448,796 4,448,796 $ $ 4,515,096 4,515,096 $ 2,691,462 $ (1) 2,691,461 $ 4,515,096 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ $ $ 4,448,796 1,230,986 5,679,782 $ $ 4,515,096 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ 4,515,096 343,555 4,858,651 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ 343,554 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 1,574,541 1,574,541 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 343,555 343,555 $ $ - Library District Intergovernmental Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement, which may result in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 1,656,077 $ 1,660,429 $ 1,660,429 $ 1,716,911 $ 12,285,661 $ $ $ 3,832 10,564,918 10,568,750 $ $ 10,319,450 10,319,450 $ $ 10,564,918 10,564,918 $ $ 58,009 2,825 60,834 $ - Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 3,161,255 Structural Balance $ 58,009 $ - $ - $ 3,832 $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 1,716,911 1,716,911 $ $ 12,225,347 12,225,347 $ $ 11,979,879 11,979,879 $ $ 12,285,661 12,285,661 $ $ 9,124,406 9,124,406 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Geiger Trust Donation Reed Family Trust Robert K. and Dorothy L. Faust Donation Grants Library District AZLAPR Learning Lab Grant Library District Grant Reconciliation AZ State Library Grant BTOP 2 AzLAPR Grant Summer Reading FY e 2014 ce t CAdopted a ge oBudget a get - $ 42,077 $ 23,333 8,410 5,000 5,334 127,835 $ 49,611 28,300 24,924 25,000 42,077 23,333 8,410 5,000 5,334 127,835 49,611 28,300 24,924 25,000 $ 169,912 $ 169,912 $ (42,077) $ (23,333) (8,410) (5,000) (5,334) (127,835) $ (49,611) (28,300) (24,924) (25,000) (42,077) (23,333) (8,410) (5,000) (5,334) (127,835) (49,611) (28,300) (24,924) (25,000) C-65-11-002-D-00 C-65-13-005-M-00 C-65-13-015-D-00 C-65-13-031-M-00 $ C-65-13-006-M-00 C-65-13-014-G-00 C-65-13-019-M-00 C-65-13-029-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-11-002-D-00 C-65-13-005-M-00 C-65-13-015-D-00 C-65-13-031-M-00 $ C-65-13-006-M-00 C-65-13-014-G-00 C-65-13-019-M-00 C-65-13-029-M-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants Grant Reconciliation - $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Geiger Trust Donation Reed Family Trust Robert K. and Dorothy L. Faust Donation Grants Library District AZLAPR Learning Lab Grant Library District Grant Reconciliation AZ State Library Grant BTOP 2 AzLAPR Grant Summer Reading $ $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Agenda Item: ou t 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 18,362,225 $ 18,362,225 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 18,362,225 $ 18,362,225 FY 2014 Budget Target $ 18,362,225 $ 18,362,225 $ 21,847 21,847 (74,151) (74,151) - (37,094) (37,094) 345,527 345,527 (3,161,255) (3,161,255) Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Property Taxes Budget Balancing Budget Balancing Adjustment for Chairman's Budget Agenda Item: $ $ $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 86 $ $ $ $ 18,309,921 $ -0.3% 15,509,403 -15.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Library District Performance Incentive Awards Donations Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Donation Friends of Library Donation Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget $ 194,168 $ 194,168 120,532 $ 49,880 500 25,800 25,000 1,077 8,675 1,896 7,704 (245,468) $ (245,468) C-49-13-038-2-00 $ C-65-13-002-M-00 C-65-13-010-M-00 C-65-13-011-M-00 C-65-13-012-M-00 C-65-13-024-M-00 C-65-13-025-M-00 C-65-13-027-M-00 C-65-13-030-M-00 $ C-65-13-034-2-00 $ 1,230,986 14,784,150 $ 69,232 49,880 1,077 8,675 1,896 7,704 (55,974) (55,974) 1,244,244 Agenda Item: $ C-49-13-038-2-00 $ $ C-65-13-002-M-00 C-65-13-010-M-00 C-65-13-011-M-00 C-65-13-012-M-00 C-65-13-024-M-00 C-65-13-025-M-00 C-65-13-027-M-00 C-65-13-030-M-00 $ C-65-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Information and Communications Technology Other IT Non-Recurring Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer 14,714,918 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Library District Performance Incentive Awards Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Donations Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Donation Friends of Library Donation Donation Fountain Hills Library Association Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget Other Non-Recurring $ $ (194,168) (194,168) (10,564,918) (10,564,918) (120,532) (49,880) (500) (25,800) (25,000) (1,077) (8,675) (1,896) (7,704) (3,904,532) 245,468 (4,150,000) $ $ $ $ (69,232) (49,880) (1,077) (8,675) (1,896) (7,704) (1,175,012) 55,974 (1,230,986) - $ - 700,000 2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 - 443,555 100,000 343,555 $ - $ - 3,161,255 3,161,255 $ 3,400,000 $ 3,604,810 Agenda Item: $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget g g 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Revenue Expenditures OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 FY 2014 Budget Target $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 7,207 $ 7,207 (7,207) $ (7,207) - 4,515,096 $ 0.0% 4,515,096 0.0% Adjustments: Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Library District Performance Incentive Awards Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget - $ 55,974 $ 55,974 (55,974) $ (55,974) - $ 1,230,986 $ - $ $ (55,974) $ (55,974) (1,175,012) $ 55,974 (1,230,986) - $ - $ - $ 343,555 $ 343,555 - $ 343,555 $ - C-49-13-038-2-00 $ C-65-13-034-2-00 Agenda Item: C-49-13-038-2-00 C-65-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer 1,230,986 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Library District Performance Incentive Awards Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget Other Non-Recurring $ Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget g g 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget $ - $ - $ - $ 10,319,450 $ - $ - $ - (10,564,918) (10,564,918) 245,468 245,468 C-65-13-034-2-00 10,564,918 (245,468) (245,468) Agenda Item: $ C-65-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer - $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget $ $ - $ - $ 3,161,255 $ 3,161,255 - $ 3,161,255 $ - Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget g g 89 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Library District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) FY 2013 Revised Budget $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) FY 2014 Budget Target $ (1,399,725) $ (1,399,725) $ 499,725 $ 499,725 499,725 499,725 $ (900,000) $ -35.7% (900,000) -35.7% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Operating Fund Transfers Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget $ 301,442 $ 301,442 $ (11,494,462) $ (11,494,462) $ 11,494,462 $ (301,442) 11,795,904 11,494,462 (301,442) 11,795,904 $ - $ $ (343,555) $ (343,555) (3,161,255) $ (3,161,255) (343,555) (343,555) (3,161,255) (3,161,255) (3,504,810) $ (3,504,810) C-65-13-034-2-00 (11,795,904) 301,442 301,442 Agenda Item: C-65-13-034-2-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer (11,795,904) $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Library - Reduce Fund Transfers and Amend Budget Other Non-Recurring $ - Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget g g $ 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Approve the Stadium District FY 2014 Adopted Budget in the amount of $11,331,698 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Stadium District. Approve the attached Executive Summary. 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Executive Summary Approval of the FY 2014 Adopted Budget incorporates the suspension of any conflicting policies as needed and amends the previously issued guideline to conform with the budget. 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Denny Barney, District 1 Steve Chucri, District 2 Clint Hickman, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s adopted expenditure budget for FY 2014 is $11,331,698 and the adopted revenue budget is $10,334,868. Chase Field is now entering its 16th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility, the District completed Phase II of the Concrete and Structural Repair project and completed the Concourse Sound System project in FY 2013. The Concrete and Structural project is projected to be an ongoing, multi-year effort based on objective findings from the Facility Assessment Study (conducted every two years) and annual observation and investigation. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue On August 1, 2012, the District issued Revenue 5,200,000 Refunding Bonds, Series 5,100,000 2012 in the amount of 5,000,000 $25,140,000 (par value) 4,900,000 with an interest rate of 2.28%. The net proceeds 4,800,000 along with $6,239,304 of 4,700,000 the fund balance was 4,600,000 used to advance refund 4,500,000 of the Revenue 4,400,000 Refunding Bonds, Series FY10 Actual FY 11 Actual FY 12 Actual FY 13 Forecast FY 14 Adopted 2002. This action effectively bought down the debt and allowed for a lower interest rate and lower annual debt service payments. As a result of the reduction in principal and interest payments, it is expected that excess car rental surcharge revenue will be available to remit to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) in FY 2014. Revenue $$ 5,300,000 I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Andy Kunasek Chairman, Board of Directors Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 93 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Evening baseball game at Chase Field 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Karina Araiza, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction By June 2017, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 5% from 80% to 85% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: 79.8% of routine items are completed on schedule. It is anticipated that 82% of preventative maintenance items will be completed on time in FY 2014. Citizen Satisfaction By June 2017, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 3% from 168 to 173 non-baseball events. Status: There were 168 non-baseball events held at the ballpark during FY 2012. This represented a 49% increase over the baseline amount of 113 non-baseball events. It is anticipated that the number of non-baseball events for FY 2013 will be 168 or greater. This goal will be updated during the FY 2015 Strategic Business Plan update process. Department Specific By June 2017, the District will increase facility revenue by 3% from $627,509 to $640,334 for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: As of August 2012, the District received $627,509 for non-baseball events. The Department expects revenue to be $627,509 in FY 2013 and anticipates reaching $640,334 in FY 2014. 95 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 14,672,786 $ 3,800,218 $ 8,843,600 $ $ $ 4,996,942 860 1,200,000 6,197,802 $ $ 3,384,928 1,144,722 57,216 1,294,920 5,881,786 $ 5,881,786 $ 6,197,802 $ $ 374,237 $ 2,230 2,549,103 246 2,295,339 5,221,155 $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES $ TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ - $ - $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES SUBTOTAL $ ELIMINATIONS 27,316,604 $ - TOTAL $ 27,316,604 $ 100 $ 100 750,000 1,095,339 1,845,539 $ 4,997,042 $ - $ 3,384,928 1,144,722 58,176 750,000 3,590,259 (3,590,259) 13,925,127 $ (3,590,259) $ 4,997,042 3,384,928 1,144,722 58,176 750,000 10,334,868 $ 1,845,539 $ 13,925,127 $ (3,590,259) $ 10,334,868 - $ 11,250 4,891,632 1,294,920 6,197,802 $ 3,000 3,000 $ 374,237 $ - $ 2,230 2,563,353 4,891,878 3,590,259 (3,590,259) 11,421,957 $ (3,590,259) $ 374,237 2,230 2,563,353 4,891,878 7,831,698 NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES TOTAL USES $ 5,221,155 $ - $ 3,500,000 $ - $ 3,500,000 $ $ 6,197,802 $ 3,503,000 660,631 $ - $ 1,842,539 $ 3,800,218 $ 7,186,139 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 15,333,417 $ 96 $ $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ 14,921,957 $ (3,590,259) 2,503,170 $ 26,319,774 $ 3,500,000 3,500,000 $ 11,331,698 - $ 2,503,170 - $ 26,319,774 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2013 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT $ 99,143 $ FY 2013 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. 114,143 $ 1,272,788 $ (1,158,645) $ 3,733,168 $ 3,733,168 $ 3,948,367 $ 9,854 $ 3,733,168 $ 3,743,022 $ 3,948,367 $ (215,199) 9,854 (205,345) $ 6,750,044 $ 6,765,044 $ 6,197,802 $ 567,242 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,900,000 1,900,000 3,500,000 $ 1,903,000 $ 1,903,000 $ 3,503,000 $ (1,600,000) (1,600,000) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,590,259) $ $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,590,259) $ 1,375,239 1,375,239 $ 10,285,335 $ 41,689,493 $ 11,331,698 $ 30,357,795 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $10,334,868 Miscellaneous $750,000 7.3% Interest $58,176 0.6% Sales Taxes $4,997,042 48.4% Charges f or Services $1,144,722 11.1% Licenses and Permits $3,384,928 32.8% Uses of Funds $11,331,698 Administrative Services $285,864 2.5% Non-Recurring $3,500,000 30.9% Cactus League Support $4,974,708 43.9% Stadium Operations $2,571,126 22.7% 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2012 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ 5,526,620 $ 5,185,324 10,711,944 $ 5,051,987 $ 5,163,561 10,215,548 $ 30,191,987 $ 5,163,561 35,355,548 $ 30,848,093 $ 5,134,293 35,982,386 $ 4,997,542 $ 5,279,750 10,277,292 $ (25,194,445) 116,189 (25,078,256) -83.4% 2.3% -70.9% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 90,180 $ 90,180 $ 63,316 $ 63,316 $ 63,316 $ 63,316 $ 60,787 $ 60,787 $ 57,576 $ 57,576 $ (5,740) (5,740) -9.1% -9.1% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,802,124 $ 10,278,864 $ 35,418,864 $ 36,043,173 $ 10,334,868 $ (25,083,996) -70.8% $ 5,467,061 $ 4,206,357 9,673,418 $ 5,533,044 $ 4,502,382 10,035,426 $ 36,927,348 $ 4,498,362 41,425,710 $ 35,590,376 $ 4,263,139 39,853,515 $ 4,974,708 $ 6,071,126 11,045,834 $ 31,952,640 (1,572,764) 30,379,876 86.5% -35.0% 73.3% 19,929 $ 31,931 34,989 125,105 211,954 $ 19,343 $ 37,113 52,314 103,726 212,496 $ 19,343 $ 37,113 62,168 107,746 226,370 $ 24,182 $ 33,244 55,583 129,773 242,782 $ 19,360 $ 37,123 54,068 125,336 235,887 $ (17) (10) 8,100 (17,590) (9,517) -0.1% 0.0% 13.0% -16.3% -4.2% (12,564) (12,564) -34.2% 0.0% -33.6% $ USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 26,190 $ 744 26,934 $ 36,762 $ 651 37,413 $ 36,762 $ 651 37,413 $ 36,763 $ 653 37,416 $ 49,326 $ 651 49,977 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 9,912,306 $ 10,285,335 $ 41,689,493 $ 40,133,713 $ 11,331,698 $ $ 99 30,357,795 72.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2012 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2014 ADOPTED SUBTOTAL $ 5,192,005 5,192,005 $ 4,752,087 4,752,087 $ 4,752,087 4,752,087 $ 4,938,190 4,938,190 $ 4,997,042 4,997,042 $ 244,955 244,955 5.2% 5.2% $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,248,674 3,248,674 $ $ 3,234,031 3,234,031 $ $ 3,234,031 3,234,031 $ $ 3,268,681 3,268,681 $ $ 3,384,928 $ 3,384,928 $ 150,897 150,897 4.7% 4.7% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ 3,447 1,142,885 1,146,332 $ 13,601 1,164,993 1,178,594 $ 13,601 1,164,993 1,178,594 $ 5,811 1,058,128 1,063,939 $ 1,144,722 1,144,722 (13,601) -100.0% (20,271) -1.7% (33,872) -2.9% LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ 425,972 $ 789,141 1,215,113 $ $ 364,152 $ 750,000 1,114,152 $ $ 364,152 $ 750,000 1,114,152 $ $ 142,307 $ 1,490,056 1,632,363 $ $ $ 58,176 $ 750,000 808,176 $ ALL REVENUES $ 10,802,124 $ 10,278,864 $ 10,278,864 $ 10,903,173 $ 10,334,868 $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0652 - PROCEEEDS FROM FINANCING $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ - $ $ - $ $ 25,140,000 25,140,000 $ $ 25,140,000 25,140,000 $ $ - $ $ 10,802,124 FY 2012 ACTUAL $ 10,278,864 FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 35,418,864 FY 2013 REVISED $ 36,043,173 FY 2013 FORECAST $ TOTAL SOURCES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ (305,976) (305,976) 56,004 -84.0% 0.0% -27.5% 0.5% (25,140,000) -100.0% (25,140,000) -100.0% 10,334,868 $ (25,083,996) -70.8% FY 2014 REVISED VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % 271,213 $ 3,085 86,307 (50,532) 37,045 347,118 $ 267,424 $ 9,048 3,000 89,904 (41,136) 25,745 353,985 $ 267,425 $ 9,220 3,000 89,731 9,854 (41,136) 25,745 363,839 $ 272,849 $ 3,689 3,788 90,446 8,586 (29,232) 26,570 376,696 $ 268,455 $ 9,084 4,000 89,565 (11,867) 15,000 374,237 $ (1,030) 136 (1,000) 166 9,854 (29,269) 10,745 (10,398) -0.4% 1.5% -33.3% 0.2% 100.0% -71.2% 41.7% -2.9% 2,275 $ 7,723 187 10,185 $ 1,475 $ 56 1,531 $ 1,475 $ 56 1,531 $ 890 $ 116 1,006 $ 2,180 $ 50 2,230 $ (705) 6 (699) -47.8% N/A 10.7% -45.7% 23,736 $ 477,200 950,283 476,668 745 2,049 2,082 18 168 424 1,933,373 $ 75,298 $ 801,599 1,001,000 512,402 851 4,950 8,400 276 780 950 2,406,506 $ 75,298 $ 816,599 1,001,000 512,402 851 4,950 8,400 276 780 950 2,421,506 $ 70,690 $ 1,422,083 987,006 480,713 1,422 4,600 5,398 156 375 519 2,972,962 $ 75,298 $ 1,974,855 1,000 496,611 3,500,000 4,950 8,400 276 875 1,088 6,063,353 $ 0.0% (1,158,256) -141.8% 1,000,000 99.9% 15,791 3.1% (3,499,149) -411180.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (95) -12.2% (138) -14.5% (3,641,847) -150.4% $ 997,261 $ 6,624,369 7,621,630 $ 900,000 $ 6,623,294 19 7,523,313 $ 900,000 $ 38,002,598 19 38,902,617 $ 896,157 $ 35,886,892 36,783,049 $ - $ 4,891,632 246 4,891,878 $ 900,000 33,110,966 (227) 34,010,739 ALL EXPENDITURES $ 9,912,306 $ 10,285,335 $ 41,689,493 $ 40,133,713 $ 11,331,698 $ 30,357,795 72.8% TOTAL USES $ 9,912,306 $ 10,285,335 $ 41,689,493 $ 40,133,713 $ 11,331,698 $ 30,357,795 72.8% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 100 100.0% 87.1% -1194.7% 87.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % SOURCES $ 141,694 $ 141,694 $ 135,500 $ 135,500 $ 135,500 $ 135,500 $ 933,604 $ 688,388 1,621,992 $ 1,308,920 $ 1,308,920 $ 1,173,420 1,173,420 866.0% N/A 866.0% $ SOURCES $ 4,458,165 $ 4,458,165 $ 4,455,841 $ 4,455,841 $ 4,455,841 $ 4,455,841 $ 4,380,775 $ 4,380,775 $ 4,572,866 $ 4,572,866 $ 117,025 117,025 2.6% 2.6% $ 6,727,020 $ 6,727,020 $ 6,251,987 $ 6,251,987 $ 6,266,987 $ 25,140,000 31,406,987 $ 6,225,202 $ 25,140,000 31,365,202 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ SOURCES $ 1,760,542 $ 50 1,760,592 $ 1,635,556 $ 1,635,556 $ 1,635,556 $ 1,635,556 $ 1,783,144 $ 1,783,144 $ 1,845,539 $ 1,845,539 $ $ SOURCES $ (2,285,347) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,590,259) $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,802,074 $ 50 $ 10,802,124 $ FY 2012 ACTUAL 10,278,864 $ - $ 10,278,864 $ FY 2013 ADOPTED 10,278,864 $ 25,140,000 $ 35,418,864 $ FY 2013 REVISED 10,214,785 $ 25,828,388 $ 36,043,173 $ FY 2013 FORECAST FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING $ FY 2013 ADOPTED SOURCES $ $ (69,185) -1.1% (25,140,000) -100.0% (25,209,185) -80.3% 209,983 209,983 (1,375,239) (1,375,239) 12.8% N/A 12.8% 62.1% 62.1% 10,334,868 $ 56,004 0.5% - $ (25,140,000) -100.0% 10,334,868 $ (25,083,996) -70.8% REVISED VS ADOPTED FY 2014 ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 46,508 $ 46,508 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 114,143 $ 114,143 $ 901,876 $ 901,876 $ 1,272,788 $ 1,272,788 $ $ 3,454,130 $ 3,454,130 $ 3,733,168 $ 3,733,168 $ 3,733,168 $ 9,854 3,743,022 $ 3,638,528 $ 3,638,528 $ 3,948,367 $ 3,948,367 $ 6,737,538 $ 6,737,538 $ 6,750,044 $ 6,750,044 $ 6,765,044 $ 31,379,304 38,144,348 $ 5,430,838 $ 31,379,304 36,810,142 $ 6,197,802 $ 6,197,802 $ 567,242 31,379,304 31,946,546 8.4% 100.0% 83.8% USES $ 2,500 $ 1,956,977 1,959,477 $ 3,000 $ 1,900,000 1,903,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,900,000 1,903,000 $ 2,500 $ 1,888,607 1,891,107 $ 3,000 $ 3,500,000 3,503,000 $ (1,600,000) (1,600,000) 0.0% -84.2% -84.1% $ USES $ (2,285,347) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) $ (3,590,259) $ 1,375,239 1,375,239 -62.1% -62.1% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 7,955,329 $ 1,956,977 $ 9,912,306 $ 8,385,335 $ 1,900,000 $ 10,285,335 $ 8,400,335 $ 33,289,158 $ 41,689,493 $ 6,865,802 $ 33,267,911 $ 40,133,713 $ 7,831,698 $ 3,500,000 $ 11,331,698 $ 568,637 29,789,158 30,357,795 6.8% 89.5% 72.8% 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL USES $ $ USES $ $ 101 (1,158,645) -1015.1% (1,158,645) -1015.1% (215,199) 9,854 (205,345) -5.8% 100.0% -5.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE Operating FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 DEBT SERVICE Operating $ 1,200,000 $ 1,215,000 $ 1,205,497 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,215,000 $ 1,205,497 $ 1,200,000 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,215,000 $ 1,205,497 $ 1,200,000 Operating $ 1,200,000 $ 1,215,000 $ 1,205,497 $ 1,200,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS Operating TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 884,520 $ 884,520 $ 986,943 $ 1,095,339 $ 884,520 $ 884,520 $ 986,943 $ 1,095,339 $ 2,200,020 $ 2,215,020 $ 3,107,940 $ 3,590,259 $ 2,200,020 $ 2,215,020 $ 3,107,940 $ 3,590,259 $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE Operating FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 2,084,520 $ 2,099,520 $ 2,192,440 $ 2,295,339 $ 2,084,520 $ 2,099,520 $ 2,192,440 $ 2,295,339 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ - $ 15,000 $ 5,497 $ - Operating $ - $ 15,000 $ 5,497 $ - 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 2,084,520 $ 2,084,520 $ 2,186,943 $ 2,295,339 Operating $ 2,084,520 $ 2,084,520 $ 2,186,943 $ 2,295,339 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 DEBT SERVICE Operating 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 915,500 $ 1,294,920 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating ELIMINATIONS Operating $ 2,200,020 $ 2,215,020 $ 3,107,940 $ 3,590,259 $ 2,200,020 $ 2,215,020 $ 3,107,940 $ 3,590,259 $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,215,020) $ (3,107,940) $ (3,590,259) Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .20 .95 .65 .70 2.50 .25 1.10 .60 .60 2.55 .25 1.15 .60 .60 2.60 .25 1.15 .60 .60 2.60 .25 1.15 .60 .60 2.60 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.50 2.50 5.00 2.45 2.45 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 2.40 2.40 5.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Facil Capital Project Mgr Finance/Business Analyst Office Assistant Project Manager Department Total FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2012 REVISED TO ADOPTED VAR % ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 - 103 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Fund FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% DEPARTMENT/FUND 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total General Adjustments Base Adjustments: Cactus League Operations Fund (250) • Decrease interest revenue by $6,000 due to lower interest rates. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Increase expenditures by $1,188 for the impact of changes in retirement contribution rates. • Increase expenditures by $19,345 due to a decrease in Personal Services Allocation Out. • Decrease Intergovernmental Payments by $16,153 as a net result of an increase to the Central Service Cost Allocation intergovernmental payment and a decrease to the intergovernmental payment to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for security at Chase Field. • Increase Other Benefits and Internal Service Charges by $373 for the impact of the changes in Risk Management charges. • Decrease Other Services by $373 to maintain structural balance. Eliminations Fund (900) • Decrease revenue and expenditures by $1,390,239 to eliminate transfers between Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) and Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year. Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year. FY 2012 ACTUAL 80.5% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 92.0% 66.8% FY 2014 ADOPTED 82.4% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % -9.6% -10.5% 80.3% 80.3% 97.7% 97.7% 17.4% 21.7% 4.0% 4.0% 16.6% 5.0% 1.0% 25.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. 104 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Mandates: Not mandated. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 Measure REV VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % FORECAST Description ACTUAL REVISED 1.0% 25.0% 5.0% Percent change in economic benefit from 4.0% 4.0% 16.6% Cactus League over prior year. 10 10 0.0% 10 10 Number of existing spring training facilities in Maricopa County for the current fiscal year. 0.0% 10 10 10 10 Number of existing and planned spring training facilities for the current fiscal year. 86.5% $ 546,706.10 $ 3,692,734.80 $ 3,559,037.60 $ 497,470.80 $ 3,195,264.00 Cost per existing spring training facility in Maricopa County for the current fiscal year. Revenue 1021.1% -83.5% 892.3% -83.4% 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 1,603,888 $ 1,294,920 $ 1,179,420 30,165,202 4,997,542 (25,209,445) 30,206,987 5,526,620 (1,164,420) (1,294,920) (115,500) (130,500) (920,997) $ 5,526,620 $ 30,191,987 $ 30,848,093 $ 4,997,542 $ (25,194,445) 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES 45,023 $ 113,500 $ 901,231 $ 1,271,826 $ (1,158,326) -1020.6% 4,997,802 31,946,546 86.5% 35,610,142 5,537,538 36,944,348 -892.3% 1,164,420 (1,294,920) (115,500) (130,500) (920,997) 86.5% $ 5,467,061 $ 36,927,348 $ 35,590,376 $ 4,974,708 $ 31,952,640 $ Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: The annual cost per spring training facility is expected to decline in FY 2014 due to the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 in FY 2013. The reduction in debt service payment will allow for a payment of $1,173,645 to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement. Revenue collected for the Car Rental Surcharge is expected to increase 5.2% from FY 2013 Revised budget amount. This estimated increase is based on historical results and conservative forecasting. Base Adjustments: Cactus League Operations Fund (250) • Increase Transfer In by $1,179,420 from Stadium District Debt Service (Fund 370) related to the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. • Increase expenditures by $1,173,256 due to an increase for payment to the AZSTA. Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) • Decrease expenditures by $1,731,662 due to a reduction in principal payments from the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. • Increase Transfer Out by $1,179,420 to Cactus League Operations (Fund 250) for payment to the AZSTA. • Increase in revenue by $244,955 due to an increase in the collection of the Car Rental Surcharge. • Decrease in revenue by $299,140 due to a reduction in interest payments from the refinancing of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2002 and the issuance of the Revenue Refunding Bonds Series in 2012. Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: Not mandated. 105 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year. Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year. Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year. Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year. $ Stadium District FY 2012 ACTUAL 80.5% FY 2013 FY 2013 REVISED FORECAST 92.0% 66.8% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (9.6%) -10.5% FY 2014 ADOPTED 82.4% 80.3% 80.3% 97.7% 97.7% 1,927 1,867 1,901 1,867 2,355,132 2,210,704 1,838,964 2,175,539 (35,165) -1.6% 2,159,906 2,210,704 2,267,330 2,175,539 (35,165) -1.6% $ (0.76) -37.1% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 4,395,006 $ 4,412,625 $ 4,338,304 $ 4,529,650 $ 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,760,165 1,635,456 1,782,932 1,845,439 (2,169,847) (2,084,520) (2,186,943) (2,295,339) $ 5,185,324 $ 5,163,561 $ 5,134,293 $ 5,279,750 $ 117,025 209,983 (210,819) 116,189 2.7% 0.0% 12.8% 10.1% 2.3% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 3,216,727 $ 3,479,882 $ 3,358,975 $ 3,663,465 $ (183,583) 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,959,477 1,903,000 1,891,107 3,503,000 (1,600,000) (2,169,847) (2,084,520) (2,186,943) (2,295,339) 210,819 $ 4,206,357 $ 4,498,362 $ 4,263,139 $ 6,071,126 $ (1,572,764) -5.3% 0.0% -84.1% -10.1% -35.0% 1.79 $ 2.03 $ 2.32 $ 2.79 17.4% - 21.7% 0.0% Expenditure Activity Narrative: The number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year is expected to decrease in FY 2014. The reduction is actually a normalization of attendance. Increase in revenue results from agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks of $152,807 and an increase of one half the net of FY 2013 revenue. The District is working with the Arizona Diamondbacks to determine an amount for non-recurring major maintenance or capital projects. Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Increase Transfer Out by $210,819 based on the existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels to be transferred to Long Term Project Reserve (Fund 450). • Increase revenue by $117,025 for the net increase in Licenses and Permits and a decrease in Other Charges for Services and Intergovernmental Charges for Services. Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Operating • Increase Transfer In by $210,819 based on the existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels to be transferred to Ballpark Operations Fund (253). • Decrease interest revenue by $836 due to lower interest rates. Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Non Recurring Non Project • One-time funding of $3,500,000 for concrete and structural improvements of the Stadium. 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s Stadium District Car Rental cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Surcharge Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies Miscellaneous Revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of Miscellaneous Revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources are solely comprised by Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Fiscal Annual Year Collections 2004-05 $ 6,024,416 2005-04 6,498,814 2006-07 6,288,093 2007-08 6,132,645 2008-09 5,304,567 2009-10 4,668,575 2010-11 4,988,266 2011-12 5,191,682 2012-13* 4,938,049 2013-14** 4,996,942 Growth Rate 23.8% 7.9% -3.2% -2.5% -13.5% -12.0% 6.8% 4.1% -4.9% 1.2% * Forecasted ** Budgeted Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the AZSTA, the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds are utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from the Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) will be made for repayment of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the reduction in debt service payment will allow for a payment of $1,173,645 to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2014. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 3,571,574 $ 3,670,660 $ 3,670,660 $ 3,666,764 $ 4,386,880 $ 141,694 141,694 $ 135,500 135,500 $ 135,500 135,500 $ 933,604 688,388 1,621,992 $ 1,308,920 1,308,920 $ $ $ 901,876 901,876 $ $ 114,143 114,143 $ $ 99,143 99,143 $ 1,272,788 1,272,788 $ $ $ $ $ Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 46,508 46,508 Structural Balance $ 95,186 $ 36,357 $ 21,357 $ 31,728 $ 36,132 Accounting Adjustments $ 4 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 3,666,764 3,666,764 $ $ 3,707,017 3,707,017 $ $ 3,692,017 3,692,017 $ $ 4,386,880 4,386,880 $ $ 4,423,012 4,423,012 $ Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 8,539,622 $ 9,343,160 $ 9,343,160 $ 9,543,659 $ 10,285,906 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,458,165 4,458,165 $ $ 4,455,841 4,455,841 $ $ 4,455,841 4,455,841 $ $ 4,380,775 4,380,775 $ $ 4,572,866 4,572,866 $ $ $ 3,638,528 3,638,528 $ $ 3,733,168 9,854 3,743,022 $ $ 3,733,168 3,733,168 $ $ 3,454,130 3,454,130 $ 3,948,367 3,948,367 Structural Balance $ 1,004,035 $ 722,673 $ 722,673 $ 742,247 $ 624,499 Accounting Adjustments $ 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 9,543,659 9,543,659 $ $ 10,065,833 10,065,833 $ $ 10,055,979 10,055,979 $ $ 10,285,906 10,285,906 $ $ 10,910,405 10,910,405 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Service (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2013 REVISED FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 9,255,676 $ 8,511,299 $ 8,511,299 $ 9,245,158 $ 3,800,218 $ 6,727,020 6,727,020 $ 6,251,987 6,251,987 $ 6,266,987 25,140,000 31,406,987 $ 6,225,202 25,140,000 31,365,202 $ 6,197,802 6,197,802 6,737,538 6,737,538 $ 6,750,044 6,750,044 $ 6,765,044 31,379,304 38,144,348 $ $ $ 5,430,838 31,379,304 36,810,142 $ 6,197,802 6,197,802 (498,057) $ 794,364 $ - $ $ 3,800,218 3,800,218 $ $ 3,800,218 3,800,218 $ $ $ Structural Balance $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ (10,518) $ 9,245,158 9,245,158 $ $ $ $ (498,057) $ 8,013,242 8,013,242 $ $ 1,773,938 1,773,938 $ $ Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2012 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2013 ADOPTED FY 2013 REVISED FY 2013 FORECAST FY 2014 ADOPTED $ 9,150,447 $ 8,895,414 $ 8,895,414 $ 8,951,563 $ 8,843,600 $ 1,760,542 50 1,760,592 $ 1,635,556 1,635,556 $ 1,635,556 1,635,556 $ 1,783,144 1,783,144 $ 1,845,539 1,845,539 $ $ $ 2,500 1,956,977 1,959,477 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ 3,000 1,900,000 1,903,000 1,758,042 $ $ 1 $ $ 8,951,563 8,951,563 $ $ 3,000 1,900,000 1,903,000 1,632,556 $ $ - $ $ 8,627,970 8,627,970 109 $ $ $ $ $ 2,500 1,888,607 1,891,107 $ $ 3,000 3,500,000 3,503,000 1,632,556 $ 1,780,644 $ 1,842,539 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 8,627,970 8,627,970 $ $ 8,843,600 8,843,600 $ $ 7,186,139 7,186,139 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer 135,500 $ 539,722 $ 15,000 524,722 - $ 638,865 $ 660,222 $ (539,722) $ (15,000) (524,722) - $ 99,143 $ $ - $ - $ - C-68-13-008-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-13-008-M-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service General Revenues Interest Revenue Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA 99,143 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer $ 135,500 Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 110 1,179,420 1,179,420 (6,000) (6,000) $ 1,173,645 $ 1,173,645 - $ 1,272,788 $ 1183.8% 1,308,920 866.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 3,733,168 $ 4,455,841 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 3,733,168 $ 4,455,841 FY 2014 Budget Target $ 3,733,168 $ 4,455,841 $ 1,188 $ 1,188 230,164 $ 19,345 210,819 117,025 117,025 - $ (16,153) $ (16,153) - $ 3,948,367 $ 5.8% 4,572,866 2.6% $ - $ (373) - Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Tentative Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Decrease Other Services to maintain structural balance Internal Service Charges Agenda Item: $ (373) 373 FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 3,948,367 $ 5.8% 4,572,866 2.6% Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer 6,251,987 $ 539,722 $ 15,000 15,000 15,000 $ 7,289,766 $ 6,266,987 $ (539,722) $ (15,000) $ 6,750,044 $ $ (552,242) $ (1,731,662) 1,179,420 - $ - (54,185) 244,955 (299,140) 6,197,802 $ -8.2% 6,197,802 -0.9% C-68-13-008-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-13-008-M-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Base Adjustments Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service General Revenues Car Rental Surcharge Interest Revenue 6,750,044 $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer $ (15,000) (15,000) 6,251,987 Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,635,556 FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,635,556 FY 2014 Budget Target $ 3,000 $ 1,635,556 $ - $ - $ - 210,819 210,819 (836) (836) 3,000 $ 0.0% 1,845,539 12.8% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: $ FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 1,900,000 $ - FY 2013 Revised Budget $ 1,900,000 $ - $ (1,900,000) $ (1,900,000) - FY 2014 Budget Target $ - $ - FY 2014 Tentative Budget $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 - $ 3,500,000 $ - Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Carry Forward Agenda Item: Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 112 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2013 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer (2,200,020) $ (539,722) $ (15,000) (539,722) (15,000) $ (2,739,742) $ (2,739,742) $ 539,722 $ 15,000 $ (2,200,020) $ (2,200,020) $ (1,390,239) $ (1,179,420) (210,819) (1,390,239) (1,179,420) (210,819) $ (3,590,259) $ 63.2% (3,590,259) 63.2% C-68-13-008-M-00 Agenda Item: C-68-13-008-M-00 FY 2014 Budget Target Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res (2,200,020) $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Cactus League Transfer $ 539,722 15,000 Agenda Item: FY 2014 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a Major League Baseball stadium, and; • Enhance and promote Major League Baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. 113 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2012 Year Ending June 30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $ 44,270,000 $ 41,165,000 $ 37,905,000 $ 34,515,000 $ 30,945,000 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities 10,864,916 10,465,338 9,286,098 8,106,857 6,909,857 $ 55,134,916 $ 51,630,338 $ 47,191,098 $ 42,621,857 $ 37,854,857 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. On August 1, 2012, the Maricopa County Stadium District issued Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 in the amount of $25,140,000 (par value) with an interest rate of 2.28% maturing on June 1, 2019. The net proceeds, along with $6,277,014 of Stadium District funds will be used to advance refund the Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002 which mature on June 1, 2013 through June 1, 2019. The outstanding bonds are redeemable at par plus accrued interest on September 5, 2012. The total principal to be refunded is $30,945,000. The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2012 Year Ending June 30 2013 Principal $ Interest 3,760,000 $ 1,663,294 Total Debt Service $ 5,423,294 2014 3,960,000 1,461,194 5,421,194 2015 4,170,000 1,248,344 5,418,344 2016 4,395,000 1,024,206 5,419,206 2017 2018–19 4,635,000 10,025,000 787,975 815,388 5,422,975 10,840,388 Total $ 30,945,000 $ 114 7,000,401 $ 37,945,401 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Interest Principal Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • Economic conditions – stability of trends, • Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, • Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, • Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, • Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: 115 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Premium quality High quality Medium quality AAA AA A Aaa Aa A AAA AA A Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade BBB BB B Baa Ba B BBB BB B Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest CCC CC C Caa Ca C CCC CC C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DD D DDD DD D Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Moody's Standard & Poor's BBB+ (1) WR (2) AAA (3) (1) Bonds are insured, underlying rating. (2) Withdrawn (3) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating Stadium District Loans Payable On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Professional Baseball Team Limited Partnership (Team) for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over nine (9) years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2017. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten (10) years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. 116 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2012 Year Ending June 30 Principal 2013 $ 1,200,000 2014 1,200,000 2015 1,200,000 2016 1,200,000 2017 2018-22 1,200,000 906,857 Total $ 117 6,906,857 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Stadium District 118 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2014 Tentative Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2014 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 119 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts DIST. NO. 2013 DISTRICT NAME K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv LEVY PURPOSE Bond Interest $ $ Bond Interest Bond Interest LESS 2014 AVAILABLE DIRECT 2013 REQUEST 450 $ 450 $ 296 $ ASSESSMENT FUNDS - $ 296 1,844 1,844 1,517 - 1,517 2,294 $ 2,294 $ 1,813 $ - $ 1,813 240 $ - $ 721 $ 721 $ 240 6,006 6,006 6,006 - 6,006 $ 6,727 $ 6,727 $ 6,246 $ - $ 6,246 $ 4,905 $ 4,905 $ 4,087 $ - $ 4,087 2,919 - 2,919 7,007 $ - $ 7,007 13,800 $ - $ Bond redemption K-109 Plymouth Street 2014 BUDGET BUDGET $ Bond redemption K-106 7th Street North Improv. ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES Bond redemption - $ $ 4,905 $ 13,800 $ 4,905 $ 13,800 $ 13,800 28795 Circle City Community Park General 28529 Estrella Dells General 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 28793 Queen Creek Water Improv General 10,900 10,900 10,900 - 10,900 7,315 7,315 6,281 - $ 130,981 $ - $ 130,981 145,940 $ 146,046 $ - $ 146,046 28835 20th Street General Subtotal $ Total $ 132,015 $ 145,940 $ 120 132,015 6,281 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies MARICOPA COUNTY STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2014 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B 3,583 3,902 11,542 1,414 8,800 12,705 1,062 23,434 3,270 5,658 7,637 7,344 283 1,288 4,994 6,920 2,829 11,953 4,593 5,482 7,644 3,897 5,743 849 814 9,921 2,228 14,880 1,113 7,536 1,113 10,182 8,354 12,741 18,281 1,828 2,505 14,767 4,244 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 3,642 3,950 12,305 1,514 9,013 13,554 1,122 23,738 3,485 6,056 8,132 7,424 303 1,377 5,335 7,379 3,028 12,788 4,905 5,550 7,822 4,171 6,141 908 691 10,608 2,293 15,912 1,192 8,030 722 10,887 8,933 13,604 19,447 1,954 2,682 14,926 4,542 121 Estimated TAX LEVY 67 4,632 15,194 1,832 672 17,029 1,345 29,507 3,955 6,288 8,930 7,776 403 1,574 6,635 9,276 2,998 15,294 5,508 6,554 9,726 5,343 6,825 1,049 946 11,971 2,682 17,987 1,300 8,756 1,012 12,061 10,247 15,342 21,910 2,150 3,350 16,306 4,695 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 674,473 1,073,310 1,649,888 190,740 6,718,270 1,534,641 295,730 1,431,836 739,187 2,557,176 1,023,908 1,547,300 1,829,557 508,190 1,334,582 1,437,970 522,216 2,697,874 1,051,439 790,530 962,567 407,784 3,620,776 676,297 198,120 3,478,149 140,706 5,418,750 310,280 2,452,083 103,040 2,765,580 2,283,368 3,419,335 4,047,242 1,264,249 209,648 1,766,174 855,790 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.0099 0.4316 0.9209 0.9605 0.0100 1.1096 0.4548 2.0608 0.5350 0.2459 0.8721 0.5026 0.0220 0.3097 0.4972 0.6451 0.5741 0.5669 0.5239 0.8291 1.0104 1.3103 0.1885 0.1551 0.4775 0.3442 1.9061 0.3319 0.4190 0.3571 0.9821 0.4361 0.4488 0.4487 0.5414 0.1701 1.5979 0.9232 0.5486 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 DESCRIPTION Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 33,902 2,644 4,523 4,942 32,150 1,414 1,663 7,832 5,029 1,027,516 14,620 2,829 3,112 250 3,678 25,379 2,908 7,017 5,289 20,124 13,440 3,395 2,575 4,185 2,227 29,269 3,828 27,726 31,767 3,395 5,658 3,894 3,340 8,374 16,424 13,361 23,464 9,416 6,411 19,943 18,623 12,522 178,461 6,313 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 34,217 2,820 4,815 5,276 32,449 1,514 1,772 8,375 5,092 1,039,886 15,633 3,028 3,331 260 3,936 25,607 3,094 7,412 5,661 20,302 13,563 3,634 2,751 4,243 2,384 29,501 3,864 29,656 32,065 3,634 6,056 3,934 3,576 8,960 17,579 14,280 23,710 10,037 6,496 20,133 18,798 12,643 180,749 6,383 122 Estimated TAX LEVY 35,401 3,123 5,280 6,636 34,315 1,953 2,202 9,513 5,431 1,110,562 17,492 3,801 4,137 15 4,014 26,954 3,728 8,280 7,196 21,523 14,653 4,444 3,098 4,692 3,015 31,525 3,919 30,836 33,880 4,193 7,073 3,777 3,826 10,112 19,692 15,914 27,841 12,822 6,876 21,229 19,464 13,127 185,999 7,273 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 3,804,615 512,496 666,707 501,246 3,474,220 203,430 218,980 2,483,561 406,739 200,457,253 3,404,536 259,289 541,593 146,910 930,929 2,619,938 183,689 337,280 400,624 2,235,161 1,617,318 400,290 141,818 540,338 323,500 3,061,559 298,729 3,166,012 3,529,476 696,059 821,155 265,705 480,787 2,538,212 3,255,826 2,936,625 3,614,381 937,462 569,314 2,135,377 2,336,961 1,637,123 34,740,893 1,083,220 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.9305 0.6094 0.7920 1.3239 0.9877 0.9600 1.0056 0.3830 1.3353 0.5540 0.5138 1.4659 0.7639 0.0102 0.4312 1.0288 2.0295 2.4549 1.7962 0.9629 0.9060 1.1102 2.1845 0.8683 0.9320 1.0297 1.3119 0.9740 0.9599 0.6024 0.8613 1.4215 0.7958 0.3984 0.6048 0.5419 0.7703 1.3677 1.2078 0.9942 0.8329 0.8018 0.5354 0.6714 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13392 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 DESCRIPTION Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 15,182 43,977 27,255 27,598 2,852 6,349 32,352 821 13,141 1,197 4,176 39,580 5,289 3,573 1,392 1,949 5,116 5,174 8,351 8,835 1,185 5,483 27,118 25,569 8,300 2,227 19,737 5,658 1,414 8,632 2,263 14,196 4,420 4,326 3,815 11,279 2,317 9,510 13,501 1,197 26,572 36,699 14,515 8,519 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 15,389 44,388 27,522 27,869 3,051 6,409 32,644 842 13,283 1,230 4,469 39,914 5,661 3,608 1,490 2,086 5,473 5,251 8,939 9,435 1,264 5,528 27,390 25,790 8,386 2,384 21,012 6,056 1,514 9,204 2,423 15,192 4,724 4,613 4,071 11,419 2,466 10,152 14,440 1,230 26,781 36,986 14,681 8,616 123 Estimated TAX LEVY 16,248 46,313 29,392 28,579 3,823 6,557 33,362 164 14,230 66 4,956 42,570 6,212 3,775 1,615 2,479 6,718 5,866 9,853 10,563 1,570 5,696 29,684 27,161 9,676 2,506 22,230 7,015 1,491 11,162 2,917 17,385 5,320 5,391 4,622 12,055 2,748 12,495 15,886 62 30,362 39,642 17,765 9,234 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 1,732,951 6,588,410 3,778,533 3,215,912 375,808 843,964 3,711,698 1,642,792 1,831,975 664,586 362,231 4,253,860 669,732 455,962 236,140 175,370 372,089 709,520 1,624,538 1,633,681 178,260 719,810 3,279,598 2,981,067 3,075,258 288,548 4,992,318 1,274,333 225,569 616,601 224,530 1,807,525 591,319 354,569 338,171 1,245,445 430,469 1,052,260 2,291,988 616,720 3,563,734 3,853,826 2,818,615 1,342,004 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.9376 0.7029 0.7779 0.8887 1.0173 0.7769 0.8988 0.0100 0.7768 0.0099 1.3682 1.0007 0.9275 0.8279 0.6839 1.4136 1.8055 0.8268 0.6065 0.6466 0.8807 0.7913 0.9051 0.9111 0.3146 0.8685 0.4453 0.5505 0.6610 1.8102 1.2992 0.9618 0.8997 1.5204 1.3668 0.9679 0.6384 1.1874 0.6931 0.0101 0.8520 1.0286 0.6303 0.6881 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 DESCRIPTION Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 638 5,941 23,002 12,395 28,199 4,162 4,833 1,678 719 2,317 4,926 799 2,077 2,443 639 2,637 3,961 4,304 639 2,528 1,518 1,438 4,041 3,619 7,356 4,394 4,616 2,876 1,838 3,675 2,784 6,681 879 9,200 532 799 2,477 1,039 2,158 2,576 10,626 6,520 4,474 10,467 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 656 6,359 23,205 12,549 28,456 4,200 5,170 1,724 739 2,380 5,057 821 2,134 2,507 657 2,708 4,239 4,417 657 2,704 1,559 1,477 4,148 3,873 7,873 4,513 4,728 2,955 1,888 3,775 2,980 7,151 903 9,690 543 821 2,544 1,067 2,308 2,754 10,915 6,679 4,596 11,204 124 Estimated TAX LEVY 24 7,992 26,471 13,650 29,389 4,308 6,206 162 102 169 464 94 192 196 417 309 5,177 435 76 2,936 171 136 298 4,241 9,504 371 394 280 144 375 3,479 8,320 69 12,360 52 100 183 94 2,761 3,007 990 589 839 13,520 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 244,360 825,405 3,169,487 1,346,746 2,737,293 340,265 1,187,444 1,616,224 1,020,990 1,687,748 4,642,085 935,830 1,922,209 1,961,935 4,166,330 3,092,129 505,629 4,345,269 756,339 274,759 1,709,209 1,360,794 2,979,068 1,114,712 653,032 3,707,315 3,942,155 2,803,311 1,439,838 3,752,806 287,240 728,077 687,874 1,712,788 522,510 996,780 1,833,837 944,918 195,838 374,260 9,904,523 5,886,445 8,386,608 2,054,088 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.0098 0.9683 0.8352 1.0136 1.0737 1.2661 0.5226 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 1.0239 0.0100 0.0100 1.0686 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.3805 1.4554 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 1.2112 1.1427 0.0100 0.7216 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0099 1.4098 0.8035 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.6582 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 DESCRIPTION Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A 2,523 2,077 719 479 1,758 8,073 639 1,670 15,843 5,710 2,505 2,784 45,844 20,297 8,908 6,162 3,584 37,590 32,703 16,130 14,636 17,857 14,354 2,784 8,629 58,207 44,473 5,205 5,665 400,100 5,399 8,073 7,170 44,961 3,134 11,260 50,577 11,692 28,581 45,584 9,743 15,470 16,472 40,100 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 2,588 2,134 739 492 1,805 8,640 657 1,788 16,957 6,104 2,682 2,980 46,290 20,496 9,534 6,587 3,830 37,947 33,030 16,285 14,768 18,021 14,480 2,980 9,236 58,831 44,962 5,262 5,738 403,787 5,776 8,640 7,260 45,367 3,164 11,382 51,066 12,514 28,860 45,988 10,428 15,611 16,649 40,457 125 Estimated TAX LEVY 256 99 52 42 171 9,981 48 1,999 20,272 7,130 2,889 3,390 51,050 22,414 10,812 7,577 4,506 41,951 35,495 17,155 16,296 19,163 15,534 3,160 10,293 64,049 48,589 5,152 6,055 440,973 6,017 9,525 7,703 46,428 3,284 12,359 54,324 13,713 29,825 47,904 11,527 16,624 19,393 42,459 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 2,563,208 994,087 515,960 420,000 1,707,717 873,858 475,722 180,605 2,990,652 938,103 222,565 450,939 4,535,277 2,159,540 1,096,178 843,572 264,360 4,170,690 3,058,616 1,656,056 1,712,350 1,831,163 1,245,579 402,174 1,023,940 5,742,137 3,870,781 518,752 563,365 26,498,040 581,291 975,931 671,719 4,844,618 341,746 1,556,015 5,348,331 1,359,620 2,329,408 4,273,093 1,110,963 1,172,986 3,046,180 3,102,014 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.0100 0.0100 0.0101 0.0100 0.0100 1.1422 0.0101 1.1068 0.6778 0.7600 1.2980 0.7518 1.1256 1.0379 0.9863 0.8982 1.7045 1.0059 1.1605 1.0359 0.9517 1.0465 1.2471 0.7857 1.0052 1.1154 1.2553 0.9932 1.0748 1.6642 1.0351 0.9760 1.1468 0.9583 0.9609 0.7943 1.0157 1.0086 1.2804 1.1211 1.0376 1.4172 0.6366 1.3688 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 DESCRIPTION Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vista Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Coldwater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID 3,714 5,011 7,671 12,531 53,020 28,465 14,456 53,285 24,027 11,599 18,955 8,487 3,678 11,119 26,152 22,351 20,634 1,277 10,606 4,705 21,273 12,294 7,238 3,739 17,970 2,719 9,654 762,922 1,542 7,770 104,721 53,518 1,949 16,259 24,852 4,621 56,688 1,403 4,969 31,233 6,121 34,832 10,192 81,556 Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET 3,962 5,363 7,751 12,651 53,524 28,727 14,576 53,768 24,354 12,415 20,288 9,084 3,936 11,226 26,357 22,550 20,796 1,311 10,729 4,754 21,436 13,154 7,294 3,781 18,202 2,750 9,654 772,425 1,608 7,994 106,082 54,905 2,086 16,697 25,474 4,719 58,212 1,440 5,099 32,103 6,297 35,742 10,470 83,953 126 Estimated TAX LEVY 3,996 6,009 8,331 15,147 56,137 30,782 14,788 56,320 30,255 12,879 22,548 9,294 4,091 12,001 27,033 24,153 21,364 125 12,695 5,003 22,622 14,727 7,765 4,664 23,365 3,256 12,413 987,087 2,053 9,794 110,460 69,817 2,437 21,101 32,023 5,556 73,810 1,713 6,527 44,327 7,801 45,304 11,542 107,355 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 574,867 454,619 1,043,969 2,211,666 6,213,314 3,285,731 1,671,350 5,301,818 7,209,596 2,985,403 2,545,806 2,525,620 911,631 1,516,399 3,567,561 2,039,907 2,134,686 1,246,063 2,081,977 505,557 2,190,631 1,638,309 1,279,651 1,238,500 2,030,148 1,153,210 941,327 104,554,438 418,441 1,948,400 19,498,371 12,271,425 702,077 3,135,053 7,232,325 2,870,470 16,832,356 1,773,118 4,268,250 8,152,001 1,621,420 7,434,143 1,257,307 17,220,487 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.6951 1.3218 0.7980 0.6849 0.9035 0.9368 0.8848 1.0623 0.4196 0.4314 0.8857 0.3680 0.4488 0.7914 0.7577 1.1840 1.0008 0.0100 0.6098 0.9896 1.0327 0.8989 0.6068 0.3766 1.1509 0.2823 1.3187 0.9441 0.4906 0.5027 0.5665 0.5689 0.3471 0.6731 0.4428 0.1936 0.4385 0.0966 0.1529 0.5438 0.4811 0.6094 0.9180 0.6234 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2014 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (continued) 2012-13 BUDGET DIST # 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 23697 DESCRIPTION Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Arroyo Norte Unit 4 13435 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 23104 Litchfield Vista Views Estimated 2013-14 BUDGET Estimated TAX LEVY 17,361 4,286 27,838 4,454 713 3,357 17,816 4,553 28,664 4,568 730 4,824 23,179 5,930 27,274 5,923 936 5,503 5,396,107 5,504,378 6,085,278 2,745 2,418 2,980 2,422 127 2,869 3,010 TAX YEAR 2013 NET ASSESSED VALUE 13,761,046 4,787,230 2,560,452 4,703,234 1,034,761 295,230 2012 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 Estimated 2013 TAX RATE 0.1684 0.1239 1.0652 0.1259 0.0905 1.8640 0.9089 0.1659