MARICOPA COUNTY FY 2013 Annual Business Strategies Adopted Budget Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Mission, Vision Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Estimating Fund Balances Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects 1 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 14 15 16 17 28 29 30 31 31 31 31 31 32 32 32 33 34 36 37 37 Library District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class i 63 65 67 68 69 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Table of Contents 70 71 71 72 74 75 75 76 76 Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 79 80 81 81 82 82 82 82 85 Stadium District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Source and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service ii 89 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 100 101 101 101 104 104 104 105 105 105 105 107 110 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Improvement Districts 115 116 117 Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Motion Approve the Flood Control District FY 2013 Budget in the amount of $84,124,369 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Flood Control District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-3620 certify to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors this Budget as adopted, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Flood Control District’s FY 2013 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 1 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget 2 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The FY 2013 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $85,023,931. Capital project expenditures are budgeted at $50,000,000 in FY 2013, a $10,000,000 decrease from FY 2012. The budget continues to provide for a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Commercial and residential property values continue to decline in Maricopa County for FY 2013. The FY 2013 budget has been developed with the tax rate remaining flat at $0.1780. This has decreased the Flood Control District Levy to $54,584,578 in FY 2013, a decrease of $7,816,594 from FY 2012. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals $7,722,000 for cost-sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2013, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $57.2 million, which is $6.7 million (9.5%) less than in Fiscal Year 2012. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2011 through FY 2013 $60,000,000 $55,000,000 $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 FY 2011 Actuals FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Budget The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $20,000 for the Floodprone Property Acquisition Program. In all, the Flood Control District has 61 scheduled projects totaling $221,000,000 in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager 3 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget On June 18, 2012, the Maricopa County Board of Directors adopted the FY 2013 Budget totaling $84,124,369. The Flood Control District’s budget is reduced by the following reasons: • • Decrease in personnel allocation in by $195,845 is due to the Public Works reorganization. Decrease in expenditures by $620,000 is due to the transfer of orthophotography to the Office of Enterprise Technology. On August 20, 2012, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2013 Tax Levy and rates. 4 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Analysis by Harold Sigüenza, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The mission of Flood Control District (FCD) is to provide regional flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation an education to Maricopa County residents so they can reduce the risk of injury, death, and property damage from flooding, while still enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The Flood Control District vision is for the residents of Maricopa County and future generations to have the maximum level of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multi-use facilities that complement and enhance the beauty of our desert environment. Department Specific By June 30, 2014, Maricopa County Flood Control District will meet the increasing demands for public works services by constructing 85% of County flood control structure projects planned to be completed on time. Status: FCD is on track to exceed the 85% on-time delivery goal of FY 2008 Capital Improvement Program projects by 2014. Average implementation percentage across the four fiscal years between FY 2008 and FY 2011 has been 87%. For FY 2012, FCD anticipates exceeding 90% execution of its Capital Improvement Program. Of the 19 construction projects completed (or anticipated to be completed) between FY 2009 and FY 2012, 19 (100%) have been (or are anticipated to be) completed on time. Safe Communities By June 30, 2013, Maricopa County Flood Control District will enhance public safety for Maricopa County residents and visitors by completing 90% of all critical maintenance tasks that directly impact the immediate safety of Maricopa County residents and visitors within an average of 14 days, and 100% of those tasks within an average of 90 days to sustain maintenance of our flood control infrastructure to Federal, State, and local safety and operational standards. Status: FCD is exceeding performance expectations for this goal. FY 2011 critical maintenance tasks were completed within an average of 6.32 days, and FY 2012 Forecasted critical maintenance tasks are expected to be completed within an average of 3.33 days. 5 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Safe Communities Maricopa County Flood Control District will enhance public safety for Maricopa County residents and visitors by June 30, 2013, by providing structural and non-structural solutions to flooding such that 80% of residents will have a reduced risk of loss of life or property due to storm water flooding. Status: By the end of FY 2012, FCD structures and floodplain delineations will have reduced the risk of loss of life or property due to storm water flooding for 2,330,528 or 61% of Maricopa County residents. Note that this status update incorporates 2010 census data; previous updates utilized 2000 census data. This accounts for the small variation in the percentage of residents protected between this update and FCD’s January 2011 update. The County population has increased and the distribution of population within the benefited area boundaries has changed. 6 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type BEGINNING FUND BALANCE SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 33,620,159 $ 26,043,506 SUBTOTAL - $ 59,663,665 - $ - $ 53,752,703 $ 166,400 131,500 300,000 160,484 54,511,087 $ - $ $ 53,752,703 166,400 131,500 300,000 160,484 54,511,087 349,000 $ - $ 7,722,000 54,098,533 349,000 $ 61,820,533 $ 349,000 $ 7,722,000 54,098,533 62,169,533 $ - $ (54,098,533) (54,098,533) $ 349,000 7,722,000 8,071,000 $ 116,680,620 $ (54,098,533) $ 62,582,087 - $ - $ 15,976,139 $ 1,905,762 15,230,156 663,312 33,775,369 $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ - $ 2,400,000 $ SERVICES 349,000 CAPITAL 47,600,000 OTHER FINANCING USES 54,098,533 TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 54,447,533 $ 50,000,000 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 54,860,087 $ 61,820,533 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 15,976,139 $ SUPPLIES 1,905,762 SERVICES 15,230,156 CAPITAL 663,312 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 33,775,369 $ TOTAL USES $ 88,222,902 59,663,665 TOTAL $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 53,752,703 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 166,400 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 131,500 INTEREST EARNINGS 300,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 160,484 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 54,511,087 $ $ ELIMINATIONS - $ $ 15,976,139 1,905,762 15,230,156 663,312 33,775,369 2,400,000 $ 349,000 47,600,000 54,098,533 104,447,533 $ - $ (54,098,533) (54,098,533) $ 2,400,000 349,000 47,600,000 50,349,000 138,222,902 $ (54,098,533) $ 84,124,369 $ 50,000,000 $ $ - $ 20,735,718 $ - $ 20,735,718 279,562 $ 37,864,039 (22,218) - $ 38,143,601 $ (22,218) - $ 38,143,601 (22,218) STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 20,735,718 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED UNASSIGNED $ 7 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2012 ADOPTED FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP All Functions 900 ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FY 2012 REVISED FY 2013 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 36,860,323 $ 36,860,323 $ 33,775,369 $ 45,000,000 45,000,000 54,098,533 $ 81,860,323 $ 81,860,323 $ 87,873,902 $ $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 349,000 $ 3,084,954 (9,098,533) (6,013,579) 217,100 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,960,000 $ 2,000,000 $ (40,000) 50,000 90,000 20,000 70,000 57,950,000 57,950,000 47,980,000 9,970,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ 9,098,533 $ 97,426,423 $ 97,426,423 $ 84,124,369 $ 13,302,054 8 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $84,124,369 Fund Balance $21,542,282 26% Intergovernmental & Grants $8,202,500 10% Property Taxes $53,752,703 64% Miscellaneous & Interest $460,484 0% Permits, Fees & Fines $166,400 0% Uses of Funds $84,124,369 Information Technology $2,363,830 3% Administrative Services $5,724,501 7% Floord Hazard Identification $9,030,732 11% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,709,095 3% Flood Hazard Regulation $2,504,400 3% Flood Hazard Remediation $61,791,811 73% 9 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2011 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ - $ 179,750 179,750 $ 5,000 $ 275,900 280,900 $ 5,000 $ 275,900 280,900 $ 4,400 $ 225,142 229,542 $ 13,000 $ 126,500 139,500 $ 8,000 (149,400) (141,400) 160.0% -54.2% -50.3% $ $ 276,162 $ 276,162 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 335,391 $ 335,391 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ (217,100) (217,100) -38.4% -38.4% $ - $ 26,962,792 81,484 27,044,276 $ 4,080,000 $ 7,557,000 11,637,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 7,557,000 11,637,000 $ 1,340,000 $ 7,491,286 6,756 8,838,042 $ 4,800,000 $ 2,922,000 7,722,000 $ 720,000 (4,635,000) (3,915,000) 17.6% -61.3% N/A -33.6% - $ 4,000 230,964 234,964 $ - $ 4,000 230,964 234,964 $ 34,473 $ 29,886 878,902 943,261 $ - $ 4,000 183,384 187,384 $ (47,580) (47,580) N/A 0.0% -20.6% -20.2% $ FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ - $ 188,746 2,760,158 2,948,904 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 67,983,675 $ 67,983,675 $ 62,963,773 $ 62,963,773 $ 62,963,773 $ 62,963,773 $ 62,521,114 $ 62,521,114 $ 54,184,203 $ 54,184,203 $ (8,779,570) (8,779,570) -13.9% -13.9% GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 856,081 $ 856,081 $ 442,292 $ 442,292 $ 442,292 $ 442,292 $ 515,660 $ 515,660 $ - $ - $ (442,292) (442,292) -100.0% -100.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 99,288,848 $ 76,125,029 $ 76,125,029 $ 73,383,010 $ 62,582,087 $ (13,542,942) -17.8% 673,278 $ 2,579,510 3,252,788 $ 704,037 $ 1,844,373 2,548,410 $ 703,798 $ 1,843,911 2,547,709 $ 671,512 $ 1,888,809 2,560,321 $ 617,323 $ 1,887,077 2,504,400 $ 86,475 (43,166) 43,309 12.3% -2.3% 1.7% 204,565 $ 342,296 1,076,373 860,401 2,483,635 $ 248,750 $ 375,635 1,226,855 787,682 2,638,922 $ 248,750 $ 375,549 1,226,855 787,682 2,638,836 $ 235,840 $ 385,888 1,353,797 762,000 2,737,525 $ 249,855 $ 370,602 1,232,205 856,433 2,709,095 $ (1,105) 4,947 (5,350) (68,751) (70,259) -0.4% 1.3% -0.4% -8.7% -2.7% 2,339,836 $ 6,741,388 9,081,224 $ 2,782,981 $ 7,290,521 10,073,502 $ 2,782,945 $ 7,290,085 10,073,030 $ 2,559,450 $ 6,982,965 9,542,415 $ 2,564,121 $ 6,466,611 9,030,732 $ 218,824 823,474 1,042,298 7.9% 11.3% 10.3% 14,278,407 $ 60,719,331 6,402,650 81,400,388 $ 13,027,615 $ 51,271,943 7,172,906 71,472,464 $ 13,027,512 $ 51,271,371 7,172,377 71,471,260 $ 12,653,074 $ 50,505,490 7,151,711 70,310,275 $ 13,982,669 $ 40,296,873 7,512,269 61,791,811 $ (955,157) 10,974,498 (339,892) 9,679,449 -7.3% 21.4% -4.7% 13.5% 81,610 $ 2,265,658 319,680 212,653 1,075,604 364,506 68,831 695,517 5,084,059 $ 142,056 $ 1,168,219 379,715 237,652 2,837,453 313,374 39,048 971,341 6,088,858 $ 149,869 $ 1,168,219 387,444 237,652 2,814,126 318,700 39,048 971,341 6,086,399 $ 77,606 $ 1,118,716 350,253 228,736 1,779,824 298,630 32,119 917,231 4,803,115 $ 66,700 $ 558,230 384,658 107,843 1,766,024 282,712 38,744 878,180 4,083,091 $ 83,169 609,989 2,786 129,809 1,048,102 35,988 304 93,161 2,003,308 55.5% 52.2% 0.7% 54.6% 37.2% 11.3% 0.8% 9.6% 32.9% 1,419,286 $ 1,532,175 2,951,461 $ 1,274,433 $ 200,501 1,474,934 $ 1,274,433 $ 4,922 200,501 1,479,856 $ 1,274,433 $ 202,765 1,477,198 $ 1,524,626 $ 116,784 1,641,410 $ (250,193) 4,922 83,717 (161,554) -19.6% 100.0% 41.8% -10.9% $ 503,188 $ 351,584 416,551 1,898,486 36,926 3,206,735 $ 656,269 $ 388,370 308,872 1,727,138 48,684 3,129,333 $ 656,269 $ 388,370 308,872 1,727,138 48,684 3,129,333 $ 624,174 $ 388,307 303,644 2,223,700 48,957 3,588,782 $ 619,875 $ 307,157 242,093 1,139,032 55,673 2,363,830 $ 36,394 81,213 66,779 588,106 (6,989) 765,503 5.5% 20.9% 21.6% 34.1% -14.4% 24.5% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 107,460,290 $ 97,426,423 $ 97,426,423 $ 95,019,631 $ 84,124,369 $ USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ $ $ $ $ DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDGT - BUDGETING FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 10 13,302,054 13.7% Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Sources and Uses by Category FY 2011 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS 67,074,350 67,074,350 FY 2012 ADOPTED $ $ FY 2012 REVISED 61,777,160 61,777,160 $ $ FY 2012 FORECAST 61,777,160 61,777,160 $ $ FY 2013 ADOPTED 61,777,160 61,777,160 $ $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 53,752,703 53,752,703 $ $ (8,024,457) (8,024,457) -13.0% -13.0% $ SUBTOTAL $ 379,767 $ 379,767 $ 315,400 $ 315,400 $ 315,400 $ 315,400 $ 753,095 $ 753,095 $ 166,400 $ 166,400 $ (149,000) (149,000) -47.2% -47.2% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 376,162 $ 6,962,792 158,646 7,497,600 $ 566,100 $ 11,637,000 186,613 12,389,713 $ 566,100 $ 11,637,000 186,613 12,389,713 $ 355,391 $ 8,831,286 188,665 9,375,342 $ 349,000 $ 7,722,000 131,500 8,202,500 $ (217,100) (3,915,000) (55,113) (4,187,213) -38.4% -33.6% -29.5% -33.8% 1,000,000 $ 642,756 1,642,756 $ 555,289 $ 922,124 1,477,413 $ 300,000 $ 160,484 460,484 $ (700,000) (482,272) (1,182,272) -70.0% -75.0% -72.0% (13,542,942) -17.8% MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 750,684 3,586,447 4,337,131 $ $ 1,000,000 642,756 1,642,756 ALL REVENUES $ 79,288,848 $ 76,125,029 $ 76,125,029 $ 73,383,010 $ 62,582,087 $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 20,000,000 20,000,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - N/A N/A TOTAL SOURCES $ 99,288,848 $ 76,125,029 $ 76,125,029 $ 73,383,010 $ 62,582,087 $ (13,542,942) -17.8% 11 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 2,336,143 $ 234 96 644,568 924 (23,224) 14,454,892 17,413,633 $ 723,506 $ 203,016 17,608,765 18,535,287 $ 723,507 $ 203,015 17,608,765 18,535,287 $ 601,747 $ 160,377 (65,366) 16,921,891 17,618,649 $ 14,057,874 $ 64,552 48,023 4,965,341 37,000 (5,567,099) 4,770,448 18,376,139 $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ 1,471,832 1,471,832 $ - $ 1,896,807 1,896,807 $ - $ 1,896,807 1,896,807 $ - $ 1,923,743 1,923,743 $ 1,232,010 $ 446,171 125,850 (46,000) 147,731 1,905,762 $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ - $ 398,380 550,504 117,744 16,451,345 17,517,973 $ - $ 566,100 16,981,548 17,547,648 $ - $ 566,100 16,981,548 17,547,648 $ - $ 355,391 1 16,520,041 16,875,433 $ 451,250 $ 11,000,735 415,340 380,715 2,630,227 143,650 157,306 24,150 355,200 (41,088) 61,671 15,579,156 $ CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 6,777,019 $ 58,448 20,046 1,230,725 42,760,253 210,361 51,056,852 $ 7,922,000 $ 49,278,000 2,246,681 59,446,681 $ 7,962,000 $ 49,238,000 2,246,681 59,446,681 $ 6,275,112 $ 101,158 610,221 50,924,888 690,427 58,601,806 $ 2,110,000 $ 72,200 582,000 45,490,000 9,112 48,263,312 $ 5,852,000 (72,200) (582,000) 3,748,000 2,237,569 11,183,369 73.5% N/A N/A N/A 7.6% 99.6% 18.8% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 87,460,290 $ 97,426,423 $ 97,426,423 $ 95,019,631 $ 84,124,369 $ 13,302,054 13.7% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 107,460,290 $ 97,426,423 $ 97,426,423 $ 95,019,631 $ 84,124,369 $ 13,302,054 13.7% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0805 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION OUT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ 12 (13,334,367) -1843.0% (64,552) N/A (48,023) N/A (4,762,326) -2345.8% (37,000) N/A 5,567,099 N/A 12,838,317 72.9% 159,148 0.9% (1,232,010) (446,171) (125,850) 46,000 1,749,076 (8,955) N/A N/A N/A N/A 92.2% -0.5% (451,250) N/A (10,434,635) -1843.2% (415,340) N/A (380,715) N/A (2,630,227) N/A (143,650) N/A (157,306) N/A (24,150) N/A (355,200) N/A 41,088 N/A 16,919,877 99.6% 1,968,492 11.2% Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON-RECURRING 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON-RECURRING FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 376,162 $ 376,162 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 355,391 $ 355,391 $ 349,000 $ 349,000 $ $ 71,949,894 $ 71,949,894 $ 63,887,129 $ 34,800 63,921,929 $ 63,887,129 $ 34,800 63,921,929 $ 64,141,276 $ 20,584 64,161,860 $ 54,511,087 $ 54,511,087 $ 348,341 $ 46,614,451 46,962,792 $ - $ 56,637,000 56,637,000 $ - $ 56,637,000 56,637,000 $ - $ 53,865,759 53,865,759 $ - $ 61,820,533 61,820,533 $ 5,183,533 5,183,533 N/A 9.2% 9.2% (20,000,000) $ (20,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ (9,098,533) (9,098,533) 20.2% 20.2% 72,298,235 $ 26,990,613 $ 99,288,848 $ FY 2011 ACTUAL 63,887,129 $ 12,237,900 $ 76,125,029 $ FY 2012 ADOPTED 63,887,129 $ 12,237,900 $ 76,125,029 $ FY 2012 REVISED 64,141,276 $ 9,241,734 $ 73,383,010 $ FY 2012 FORECAST 54,511,087 $ 8,071,000 $ 62,582,087 $ FY 2013 ADOPTED FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING $ NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FY 2012 ADOPTED $ (217,100) (217,100) -38.4% -38.4% (9,376,042) -14.7% (34,800) -100.0% (9,410,842) -14.7% (9,376,042) -14.7% (4,166,900) -34.0% (13,542,942) -17.8% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % - $ 398,381 398,381 $ - $ 566,100 566,100 $ - $ 566,100 566,100 $ 20,000 $ 335,391 355,391 $ - $ 349,000 349,000 $ 34,355,300 $ 40,000,000 74,355,300 $ 36,860,323 $ 45,000,000 81,860,323 $ 36,860,323 $ 45,000,000 81,860,323 $ 35,064,240 $ 45,000,000 80,064,240 $ 33,775,369 $ 54,098,533 87,873,902 $ 3,084,954 (9,098,533) (6,013,579) 8.4% -20.2% -7.3% 52,706,609 $ 52,706,609 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 59,600,000 $ 59,600,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 10,000,000 10,000,000 16.7% 16.7% (20,000,000) $ (20,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ (54,098,533) $ 9,098,533 9,098,533 -20.2% -20.2% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ 34,355,300 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ 73,104,990 $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 107,460,290 $ 36,860,323 $ 60,566,100 $ 97,426,423 $ 36,860,323 $ 60,566,100 $ 97,426,423 $ 35,084,240 $ 59,935,391 $ 95,019,631 $ 33,775,369 $ 50,349,000 $ 84,124,369 $ 3,084,954 10,217,100 13,302,054 8.4% 16.9% 13.7% FUND TOTAL USES $ 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 13 217,100 217,100 N/A 38.4% 38.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Fund Transfer In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS Non-Recurring FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 Non-Recurring $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 Non-Recurring $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 ELIMINATIONS $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) Non-Recurring $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS - Fund Transfer Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE Non-Recurring FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 Non-Recurring $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 Non-Recurring $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 54,098,533 ELIMINATIONS $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) Non-Recurring $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (54,098,533) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 14 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROCUREMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION FLOOD WARNING PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .55 2.60 .00 1.75 .00 .10 .00 .00 5.00 .55 2.60 .75 .10 4.00 .95 11.60 1.00 7.35 2.00 4.10 27.00 1.00 55.00 .40 9.00 1.00 5.60 2.00 4.00 27.00 1.00 50.00 72.7% 346.2% N/A 320.0% N/A 4000.0% N/A N/A 1000.0% .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 17.27 11.15 28.42 16.62 11.10 27.72 2556.9% 22200.0% 3960.0% .15 .15 .15 .15 .00 .15 .00 .00 .15 .15 .15 2.55 5.73 4.05 10.18 22.51 2.55 5.58 4.05 10.18 22.36 N/A 3720.0% N/A N/A 14906.7% .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 16.75 8.25 25.00 16.00 7.85 23.85 2133.3% 1962.5% 2073.9% .15 .85 1.00 2.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 10.72 34.75 61.10 106.57 10.57 33.90 60.10 104.57 7046.7% 3988.2% 6010.0% 5228.5% 8.00 8.00 .00 9.00 8.00 16.50 16.50 254.00 16.50 16.50 245.00 N/A N/A 2722.2% 15 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Administrative Staff Supv Administrative Supervisor Administrator Applications Development Mgr Applications Development Supv Atmospheric Science Pro Attorney - Senior Counsel Chemical Applicatns Tech Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Communicatn Officer Supervisor Construction Maintenance Supv Crew Leader Database Administrator Development Svcs Specialist Development Svcs Supervisor Development Svcs Technician Director - Flood Control Dist Engineer Engineering Associate Engineering Manager Engineering Specialist Engineering Supervisor Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Executive Assistant Field Operations Supervisor Finance Manager - Large Finance Support Supervisor Finance/Business Analyst Financial Supervisor - Dept General Maintenance Worker GIS Programmer/Analyst GIS Technician Heavy Equipment Operator Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Specialist Inspection Supervisor Inspector Instrumentation Tech-Water Management Analyst Management Assistant Materials Inventory Specialist Mechanic - Automotive Media Specialist Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized Operations Supervisor - PW Operations/Program Manager Operations/Program Supervisor Planning Supervisor Procurement Specialist Procurement Supervisor - Dept Public Works Chief Appraiser Real Property Manager FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 2.00 3.00 6.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 34.00 19.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 16.00 4.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 16.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 2.00 N/A 3.00 N/A 6.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 1.00 N/A (1.00) (100.0%) 1.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 0.0% 5.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 5.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 6.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 0.0% 34.00 N/A 19.00 N/A 0.0% 4.00 N/A 8.00 N/A 16.00 N/A 4.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 7.00 N/A 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A (1.00) (100.0%) 10.00 N/A 10.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 11.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 16.00 N/A 4.00 N/A 3.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 8.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 0.0% 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 3.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Staffing by Market Range Title (Continued) MARKET RANGE TITLE Real Property Specialist Real Property Supervisor Software Sys Engineer Technical Program Supv Trades Generalist Web Designer/Developer Department Total FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 11.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 10.00 1.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 254.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 11.00 N/A 3.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 2.00 N/A 10.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 245.00 2722.2% Staffing by Fund 991 Department Total FUND FLOOD CONTROL FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 8.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 254.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 254.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 245.00 2722.2% 245.00 2722.2% Staffing Variance Analysis In May 2012, the Public Works constellation was dissolved such that each business segment returned to its own department. The increase in FTEs from FY 2012 to FY 2013 reflects the movement of all positions performing Flood Control functions from the Public Works Flood Control organization to the Maricopa County Flood Control District. Additionally the GIS and Real Estate functions will reside in Flood Control providing services to both Flood Control and Transportation. General Adjustments Flood Control Fund (991): • • • • • Increase in regular benefits by $96,725 is due to the net impact of changes in the retirement contribution rates while experiencing a decrease in the cost of County-funded life insurance for each employee. Decrease in expenditures by $47,940 is due to a reduction of payroll hours from 2088 in FY2012 to 2080 hours in FY 2013. Decrease in Other Benefits and Internal Services Charges by $83,717 for the impact of the changes in Risk Management charges. Decrease in personnel allocation in by $195,845 is due to the Public Works reorganization. Decrease in expenditures and revenue by $620,000 is due to the transfer of orthophotography to the Office of Enterprise Technology. 17 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Programs and Activities Flood Hazard Regulation Program Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplain permits and clearances completed within 90 days of submittal to the Flood Control District Percent of first review of map changes completed within 90 days of submittal to the Flood Control District Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request FY 2011 ACTUAL 87.2% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 68.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.3% 90.0% 90.0% 100.0% 10.0% 11.1% Activities that comprise this program include: • Floodplain Permitting • Floodplain Regulation Compliance Floodplain Permitting Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Permitting Activity is to provide clearance and permitting services to the permit applicant so they can make changes needed to their plans or pick up their approved permits. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of floodplain permits and clearances completed within 90 days of submittal to the Flood Control District Percent of first review of map changes completed within 90 days of submittal to the Flood Control District Number of floodplain clearance and permit applications reviewed Number of map change reviews completed Number of floodplain clearance and permit applications submitted Number of map change reviews requested Total expenditure per map change review FY 2011 ACTUAL 87.2% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 68.2% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 375 400 350 350 (50) -12.5% 22 375 8 400 8 350 8 350 (50) 0.0% -12.5% 22 $ 117,250.45 8 $ 230,488.88 8 $ 236,101.13 8 $ 235,884.63 $ (5,395.75) 0.0% -2.3% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 126,500 126,500 $ $ (149,400) (149,400) -54.2% -54.2% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 2,579,510 $ 2,579,510 $ 1,887,077 $ 1,887,077 $ $ (43,166) (43,166) -2.3% -2.3% 179,750 179,750 275,900 275,900 225,142 225,142 Expenditure 18 $ 1,843,911 $ 1,843,911 $ 1,888,809 $ 1,888,809 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Activity Narrative: The FY 2013 performance measures are in line with the Forecast for FY 2012. Activity demand is generally driven by development in unincorporated Maricopa County, and the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. Demand has continued to be at low levels due to the economic recession. Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Regulation Compliance Activity is to provide inspection and enforcement services to property owners so they can develop their property without adversely impacting surrounding property. Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3613, 3614, and 3615 requires authorization for development in watercourses and outlines violations and penalties; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of floodplain complaints investigated within 30 days of receipt Percent of floodplain use permit inspections completed within one day of request Number of floodplain complaints investigated Number of floodplain use permit inspections completed Number of floodplain complaints Number of floodplain use permits requiring inspection Total expenditure per floodplain use permit inspection completed FY 2011 ACTUAL 100.0% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 94.3% 90.0% 90.0% 73 526 200 1,000 100 550 73 526 200 1,000 100 550 FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 10.0% 11.1% 100 550 (100) (450) -50.0% -45.0% 100 550 (100) (450) -50.0% -45.0% $ 1,280.00 $ 703.80 $ 1,220.93 $ 1,122.41 $ (418.61) -59.5% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - $ $ 5,000 5,000 $ $ 4,400 4,400 $ $ 13,000 13,000 $ $ 8,000 8,000 160.0% 160.0% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 673,278 673,278 $ $ 703,798 703,798 $ $ 671,512 671,512 $ $ 617,323 617,323 $ $ 86,475 86,475 12.3% 12.3% Revenue Expenditure Activity Narrative: Activity demand is driven by development in unincorporated Maricopa County, and in the cities and towns for which the District provides floodplain management. Demand has continued to be at low levels for FY 2013 resulting in decreased expenditures. Flood Hazard Outreach Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Outreach Program is to provide information services to the public and other agencies so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves from injury and loss of property from flooding. 19 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Program Results Measure Description Percent of affected residents surveyed who report that the printed and electronic materials were useful to understand the project or study FY 2011 ACTUAL 95.2% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that understand the media messages and civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Percent of days that reliable weather, water level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Percent of customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.3% 98.0% 98.2% 99.0% 1.0% 1.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise the program include: • Flood Control Customer Service • Flood Control Public Information • • FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% Flood Safety Education Flood Warning Flood Control Customer Service Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Customer Service Activity is to provide responsive flood hazard and mitigation advisory information services to the general public, government agencies and other entities so they can make informed development decisions and be protected from loss of life and property damage due to flooding. Mandates: Not mandated. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of customers surveyed who were satisfied with the service/information that they received Number of customer information requests completed Number of customer information requests received Total activity expenditure per citizen information request response provided FY 2011 ACTUAL 95.0% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% 5,284 3,000 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% 5,284 3,000 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% $ 64.78 $ 125.18 $ 128.63 $ 123.53 $ 1.65 1.3% $ $ 342,296 342,296 $ $ 375,549 375,549 $ $ 385,888 385,888 $ $ 370,602 370,602 $ $ 4,947 4,947 1.3% 1.3% Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES Activity Narrative: Citizen demand has continued to be at low levels due to the economic recession. However, other services provided in this Activity are seeing an increase in demand, such as federal obligations related to the National Flood Insurance Program and other regulatory tasks. Expenditures remain fairly constant due to these other services provided in this activity. Flood Control Public Information Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Public Information Activity is to provide project and study information services to affected Maricopa County residents and property owners so they can understand how their flooding risk is being mitigated in order to preclude injury, loss of life, and property damage. 20 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Mandates: A.R.S. §48-3609E requires counties to have floodplain regulations adopted at a public meeting; 48-3616 requires the chief engineer and his staff to prepare a comprehensive program of flood hazard mitigation reported at a public hearing; 44CFR 59-78 (Code of Federal Regulations) establishes guidelines for emergency management assistance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) related to flood hazards and flood insurance. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of affected residents surveyed who 95.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% report that the printed and electronic materials were useful to understand the project or study Number of public meetings held 17 23 23 23 0.0% Number of printed materials produced 61 40 40 40 0.0% Number of website hits received 8,811,674 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 0.0% Number of public meetings required 17 23 23 23 0.0% Number of printed materials (including 61 40 40 40 0.0% brochures, advertisements and newsletters) needed Total activity expenditure per affected resident $ 0.02 $ 0.05 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ (0.00) -0.6% that utilized the District website Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 204,565 204,565 $ $ 248,750 248,750 $ $ 235,840 235,840 $ $ 249,855 249,855 $ $ (1,105) (1,105) -0.4% -0.4% Activity Narrative: This demand is decreasing from FY 2011 as the District continues to implement its Comprehensive Floodplain Management Plan. Demands in this activity are remaining constant and are keeping expenditures at FY 2012 Revised levels. Flood Safety Education Activity The purpose of the Flood Safety Education Activity is to provide flood and storm water safety education services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can be aware of flood hazards and understand how to avoid injury and loss of life due to flooding. Mandates: Not mandated. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of residents and visitors surveyed that N/A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% understand the media messages and civic presentations about the risks of floods and flood hazards Number of school and civic presentations 6 9 9 9 0.0% Number of school and civic presentations 6 9 9 9 0.0% requested Total expenditure per school and civic $ 143,400.17 $ 87,520.22 $ 84,666.67 $ 95,159.22 $ (7,639.00) -8.7% presentation Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 860,401 860,401 $ $ 787,682 787,682 $ $ 762,000 762,000 $ $ 856,433 856,433 $ $ (68,751) (68,751) -8.7% -8.7% Activity Narrative: Expenditures under this activity are anticipated to increase as the District implements a pilot program to convey educational messages through billboard advertising. Additional expenditure increases result from the filling of a formerly-vacant position. 21 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Warning Activity The purpose of the Flood Warning Activity is to provide reliable weather, water level and stream flow information and flood response planning services to public safety managers so they can make public safety decisions in a timely and effective manner. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 requires the District to operate in accordance with Federal guidance that is normally issued in the form of structure Operating and Maintenance Manuals. The manuals federally direct the District to operate and maintain the structure and other equipment installed during construction in accordance with the standard in that manual. National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and related laws require entities such as the District to protect those in a floodplain. In order to fulfill this requirement, monitoring is required to provide sufficient lead-time to allow evacuation of those in danger. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency REV VS ADOPTED Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of days that reliable weather, water 99.3% 98.0% 99.5% 99.0% 1.0% 1.0% level and stream flow information was available Percent of needed flood response plans that 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% were completed or updated and distributed to agencies Number of days the sensors were operational 232,831 234,202 178,298 241,744 7,542 3.2% Number of flood response plans completed 1 1 1 1 0.0% Number of days the sensors are needed 237,505 234,202 179,602 244,185 9,983 4.3% Number of flood response plans requested 1 1 1 1 0.0% Total activity expenditure per flood response $ 1,076,373.00 $ 1,226,855.00 $ 1,353,797.00 $ 1,232,205.00 $ (5,350.00) -0.4% plan provided Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ $ 1,076,373 1,076,373 $ $ 1,226,855 1,226,855 $ $ 1,353,797 1,353,797 $ $ 1,232,205 1,232,205 $ $ (5,350) (5,350) -0.4% -0.4% Activity Narrative: Activity demand follows the 659 sensors in place for FY 2012. An additional three sensors will be installed for FY 2013 as Flood Control continues to expand the effectiveness of its flood warning network. Slight growth on a year-over-year basis is anticipated due to the additional sensors. Flood Hazard Identification Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Identification Program is to provide flood hazard information and solution services to government entities so they can utilize knowledge of flood hazards to protect the public and infrastructure. Program Results Measure Description Percent of floodplains delineated (in linear miles) FY 2011 ACTUAL 68.8% Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards 40.4% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 69.4% 69.2% 55.3% Activities that comprise this program include: • Flood Hazard Planning 55.3% • 22 FY 2013 ADOPTED 69.2% 54.0% Floodplain Delineation REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.1%) -0.2% (1.3%) -2.3% Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Hazard Planning Activity The purpose of the Flood Hazard Planning Activity is to provide flood and erosion hazard identification and flood mitigation services to municipalities and public agencies so they can have the information necessary to mitigate identified flood and erosion hazards. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3609 establishes rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations including planning; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Output Output Output Output Output Demand Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of watershed square miles studied that provide residents with the information necessary to mitigate flood and erosion hazards Cumulative square miles of Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed through the end of this fiscal year Number of linear miles of watercourse where Watercourse Master Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of new Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Number of square miles of updated Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans completed this fiscal year Total number of square miles identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Number of linear miles of watercourse identified for Watercourse Master Plans Number of population in areas identified for Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans Total activity expenditure per number of population in areas where Area Drainage Master Studies or Plans were completed this fiscal year FY 2011 ACTUAL 40.4% $ FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 55.3% 55.3% FY 2013 ADOPTED 54.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (1.3%) -2.3% 2,430 3,331 3,331 3,254 - 27 27 27 - 0.0% 979,943 235,215 235,215 504,318 269,103 114.4% N/A 500 500 318 (182) N/A 3 3 138 135 4500.0% 6,022 6,022 6,022 6,022 - 0.0% 191 191 191 191 - 0.0% 2,908,493 2,908,493 2,908,493 2,908,493 - 0.0% 6.80 $ 30.99 $ 29.69 $ (77) -2.3% -36.4% 12.82 $ 18.17 58.6% $ 6,466,611 $ 6,466,611 $ $ 823,474 823,474 11.3% 11.3% Expenditure 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 6,741,388 $ 6,741,388 $ 7,290,085 $ 7,290,085 $ 6,982,965 $ 6,982,965 Activity Narrative: Activity demand is driven by changes in population. Although the County has not seen a marked population decrease, the District anticipates reducing its output and expenditures in this activity to counteract reductions in revenues. Results are anticipated to grow at a reduced rate, although Flood Control will continue to seek efficiencies to mitigate the impact of resource restrictions. Floodplain Delineation Activity The purpose of the Floodplain Delineation Activity is to provide National Floodplain Insurance Programbased flood hazard identification services to floodplain administrators so they can have the necessary information available to regulate floodplains. Mandates: A.R.S. §11-821 requires the County to establish a comprehensive long-term county plan for the development; 48-3605, 48-3606, 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations; 48-3616 establishes the requirement for a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. 23 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of floodplains delineated (in linear 68.8% 69.4% 72.3% 69.2% (0.1%) -0.2% miles) Number of cumulative linear miles of 4,119 4,151 4,328 4,144 (7) -0.2% floodplains delineated through the end of the fiscal year Linear miles of floodplains currently under N/A 220 309 159 (61) -27.7% delineation study Linear miles of floodplain delineated this fiscal N/A 30 209 159 129 430.0% year Total number of linear miles of floodplains 5,985 5,985 5,985 5,985 0.0% requiring delineation Total activity expenditure per linear mile of $ 91,625.18 $ 92,764.83 $ 12,246.17 $ 16,126.55 $ 76,638.29 82.6% floodplain delineated Revenue 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 276,162 276,162 $ $ 989 - FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 566,100 566,100 $ $ 298,381 2,041,455 $ 2,339,836 $ 335,391 335,391 $ $ 566,100 2,216,845 $ 2,782,945 $ 349,000 349,000 $ $ (217,100) (217,100) -38.4% -38.4% 335,391 2,224,059 $ 2,559,450 $ 349,000 2,215,121 $ 2,564,121 $ 217,100 1,724 218,824 38.4% 0.1% 7.9% Expenditure $ Activity Narrative: Activity demand is generally constant, as floodplain delineation data requires update on an ongoing basis. Specific regions requiring new large-scale delineations may cause shortterm aberrations. Flood Hazard Remediation Program The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Program Results Measure Description Percent of square miles of area that receive physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of Capital Improvement Program budget expended this fiscal year Percent of capital projects implemented with multi-purpose features this fiscal year Percent of Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders for critical maintenance tasks that directly impact the immediate safety of Maricopa County residents and visitors completed within an average of 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within an average of 90 calendar days Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Percent of the dam safety operating and capital budget expended this fiscal year to keep dams operating safely and functioning properly FY 2011 ACTUAL 4.2% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 9.2% 2.6% FY 2013 ADOPTED 10.2% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 1.0% 10.6% 90.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 60.0% 80.0% 50.0% (10.0%) -16.7% 95.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 89.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 72.7% 72.7% 68.2% (4.5%) -6.3% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% N/A N/A N/A 24 Department Strategic Plans and Budgets Public Works – Flood Control Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Activities that comprise this program include: • Dam Safety • Flood Control Capital Projects • Flood Control Structure Maintenance Dam Safety Activity The purpose of the Dam Safety Activity is to provide risk management and risk reduction services to the population of Maricopa County downstream of the District's flood control dams so they can experience the long-term benefits of flood protection provided by the dams. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 48-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies Percent of the dam safety operating and capital budget expended this fiscal year to keep dams operating safely and functioning properly Number of dam repair and rehabilitation project milestones completed this fiscal year Number of dam assessments completed this fiscal year Number of dam repair and rehabilitation project milestones identified for completion this fiscal year Number of dam assessments scheduled this fiscal year Total activity expenditure per dam repair and rehabilitation milestone completed this fiscal year FY 2011 ACTUAL 72.7% FY 2012 REVISED 72.7% FY 2012 FORECAST 72.7% FY 2013 ADOPTED 68.2% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (4.5%) -6.3% 98.6% 100.0% 100.0% N/A N/A N/A -25.0% 2 4 3 3 (1) 22 22 22 22 - 2 4 3 3 (1) 22 22 22 22 - $614,312.50 $ 3,256,878.00 $ 4,217,691.33 $ 4,660,889.67 $ (1,404,011.67) 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL SOURCES $ $ - $ $ 4,080,000 4,080,000 $ $ 1,340,000 1,340,000 $ $ 4,800,000 4,800,000 $ $ 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL USES $ 1,245,792 13,032,615 $14,278,407 $ 2,295,512 10,732,000 13,027,512 $ 1,663,897 10,989,177 12,653,074 $ 1,981,669 12,001,000 13,982,669 $ 0.0% -25.0% 0.0% -43.1% Revenue 720,000 720,000 17.6% 17.6% Expenditure $ $ $ $ 313,843 (1,269,000) (955,157) 13.7% -11.8% -7.3% Activity Narrative: All 22 dam structures are assessed every year. The results of these assessments are the projects that will be pursued the following year. Activity demand correlates primarily to the age of the structures and to regulatory judgments. Rehabilitation and improvement projects attempt to combat aging infrastructure concerns. Demand will continue to be at high levels due to rehabilitation programs in progress. Reduced revenues may cause delays in the delivering projects under this activity. Flood Control Capital Projects Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Capital Projects Activity is to provide structural and non-structural flood protection services to residents of and visitors to Maricopa County so they can have increased physical protection from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to flooding. 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1423 and 45-1424 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3616 establishes that the chief engineer develop a survey and report of flood control problems and facilities. Measure Type Result Result Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent of square miles of area that receive 4.2% 9.2% 2.6% 10.2% 1.0% 10.6% physical protection benefits from projects in the five-year Capital Improvement Program that are completed in this fiscal year Percent of Capital Improvement Program budget 90.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% expended this fiscal year 80.0% 60.0% 80.0% 50.0% (10.0%) -16.7% Percent of capital projects implemented with multi-purpose features this fiscal year Number of capital projects completed in this 5 5 5 4 (1) -20.0% fiscal year Number of square miles of area to be benefited 721 695 690 686 (9) -1.3% by projects scheduled in five-year Capital Improvement Program beginning this fiscal year Total expenditure per square mile of area $ 48,937.52 $ 73,792.99 $ 73,175.15 $ 58,733.24 $ 15,059.76 20.4% benefited by projects completed this fiscal year Revenue 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $46,962,792 $ 7,557,000 (20,000,000) $26,962,792 $ 7,557,000 $29,991,286 $42,922,000 $ 35,365,000 (22,500,000) (40,000,000) (40,000,000) $ 7,491,286 $ 2,922,000 $ (4,635,000) 468.0% N/A -61.3% 991 - FLOOD CONTROL 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $41,595,841 $ 2,003,371 39,123,490 49,268,000 (20,000,000) $60,719,331 $51,271,371 $24,394,667 $42,297,873 $(40,294,502) -2011.3% 48,610,823 37,999,000 11,269,000 22.9% (22,500,000) (40,000,000) 40,000,000 N/A $50,505,490 $40,296,873 $ 10,974,498 21.4% Expenditure Activity Narrative: Demand is a function of the nature of projects in the Flood Control District’s fiveyear Capital Improvement Program, and the available funding for the program. Project benefited area can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on the number, size, type and location of the projects. Dam rehabilitation projects dramatically impact demand, as individual dam rehabilitation projects have very large corresponding benefited areas. As the dams age, required rehabilitation projects cause large demand increases. Demand and expenditures do not directly correlate, as urbanarea projects may have high costs but comparatively less benefited area. Reduced revenues are anticipated to cause delays in delivering projects under this activity. Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity The purpose of the Flood Control Structure Maintenance Activity is to provide flood control infrastructure maintenance services that meet federal, state and local safety and operational standards to residents and visitors of Maricopa County so they can experience protection from flooding as a consequence of safe and well maintained flood control structures. Mandates: A.R.S. §45-1212 provides that the State’s director of water resources issue rules and orders necessary to secure maintenance and operation of dams which will safeguard life and property; 48-1423 gives power to Maricopa County to cooperate with the federal government in flood control projects; 48-3608 establishes that the director is designated as the state coordinator of the national flood insurance program to assist local jurisdictions in complying with the requirements of such program and state law; 48-3609 establishes assistance and rules for floodplain delineations and flood regulations. 26 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent of Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders for critical maintenance tasks that directly impact the immediate safety of Maricopa County residents and visitors completed within an average of 14 calendar days Percent of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed within an average of 90 calendar days Number of critical maintenance Priority 1 (P1) Work Orders completed Number of Work Orders completed Number of Priority 1 (P1A) Work Orders completed Number of Work Order requests submitted Total activity expenditure per Work Order completed Flood Control District FY 2011 ACTUAL 95.0% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 89.1% 100.0% FY 2013 ADOPTED 100.0% 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 20 30 27 30 613 46 850 60 688 42 765 60 845 $ 10,394.93 $ 850 9,819.96 $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 7,512,269 $ 7,512,269 $ $ 788 $ 10,263.07 $ 850 8,438.09 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL SOURCES $ $ $ $ - 991 - FLOOD CONTROL TOTAL USES $ 6,402,650 $ 6,402,650 - 0.0% 0.0% (85) - -10.0% 0.0% (1,381.87) 0.0% -16.4% Revenue 81,484 81,484 6,756 6,756 - N/A N/A Expenditure $ 7,172,377 $ 7,172,377 $ 7,151,711 $ 7,151,711 (339,892) (339,892) -4.7% -4.7% Activity Narrative: Activity demand correlates primarily to the age of District structures and to the prevalence of trespassing and vandalism. Rehabilitation and improvement projects attempt to combat aging infrastructure concerns, and the District has increased collaborative efforts with law enforcement to reduce trespassing and vandalism. However, as the District’s most significant structures begin to approach their design life, maintenance demand will continue to increase; expenditure trends will correspondingly increase on a long-term basis. The District’s FY 2013 expenditure increase in this activity is due to reallocation of fuel cost from Administrative Services. 27 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Fiscal 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Tax Rate Net Assessed (per $100 Value Year Tax Levy N.A.V.) (Thousands) 24,140,629 0.2119 44,165,629 26,585,248 0.2119 50,550,367 29,605,196 0.2119 62,733,411 32,778,027 0.2047 67,096,622 45,937,945 0.1533 70,422,870 54,751,263 0.1367 74,674,333 54,862,329 0.1367 74,996,804 45,681,391 0.1489 68,019,592 35,056,838 0.1780 62,401,172 30,665,493 0.1780 54,584,578 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2013. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2012 to FY 2013 due to the decline in property values county-wide. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate will remain flat at $0.1780 per $100 net assessed value. 60 $0.2500 50 $0.2000 40 $0.1500 30 $0.1000 20 $0.0500 10 0 $04 05 06 07 08 09 Fiscal Year 28 10 11 12 13 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The FY 2013 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $54,584,578, a decrease from the FY 2012 Adopted Levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to keep property tax rates flat. FY 2013 PROPERTY TAX LEVY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2013 Adopted FY 2012 Adopted FY 2011 Adopted $ 30,665,493,359 $ $ 35,056,838,356 $ $ 45,681,391,282 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Revenue from 1Value w/SRP cent Levy 108,165,991 $ 30,773,659,350 $ 104,838,912 $ 35,161,677,268 $ 104,842,101 $ 45,786,233,383 $ Tax Rates 3,077,366 $ 3,516,168 $ 4,578,623 $ SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.1780 $ 0.1780 $ 0.1489 $ 54,584,578 $ 62,401,172 $ 68,019,592 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 192,535 $ 186,613 $ 156,110 $ 54,777,113 62,587,785 68,175,702 Levy Limit FY 2013 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2013 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 85,955,378 0.2803 FY 2013 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 54,584,578 0.1780 Amount Under Limit: $ 31,370,800 0.1023 36.5% FY 2013 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2013 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 62,618,937 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.2042 FY 2013 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 54,584,578 0.1780 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 8,034,359 0.0262 FY 2013 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 111,000 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 22.67 19.76 2.91 29 $ 12.8% 12.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2012 vs. FY 2013 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2012: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2013: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) 124,500 0.1780 22.16 $ 111,000 0.1780 19.76 $ 2.40 10.8% The FY 2013 budgeted property tax revenue of $53,752,703 is based on an historical collection rate of 98.8%. The table below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2013. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2013 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 54,584,578 $ 53,752,703 Rate 98.8% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2011 actual, the FY 2012 forecast and the FY 2013 budget revenue for this category. In FY 2012, the District projected an increase from FY 2011 for licenses and permits due to a large license payment from the City of Scottsdale for an easement of a sewer line. 30 Licenses and Permits Revenue $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2013 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of SRP’s increase in estimated net assessed value. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2004 152,557 2005 196,239 2006 191,727 2007 199,736 2008 149,582 2009 133,384 2010 144,249 2011 156,110 2012* 186,613 2013** 192,535 * Forecast ** Budget Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2013 budget is reflective of receiving $7,722,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. Interest rates have continued to decline leading to a decrease in interest revenue. $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. 31 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfer $50 $45 $40 $ (Millions) $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 2011 2012 2013 Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The schedules in the following section list estimated beginning fund balances, estimated sources and uses for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances at the end of the upcoming fiscal year. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Presentation of fund balances has been adjusted in accordance with Statement 54 of the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). For budgeting purposes, fund balances exclude any amounts defined as “non-spendable,” such as fixed assets. District ending fund balances are usually classified as “restricted,” because all District fund balances are subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions. However, a negative ending balance would be classified as “unassigned.” Estimating Fund Balances The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for the upcoming fiscal year begins with audited actual fund balance information as of the end of the prior fiscal year, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning balances for the upcoming fiscal year are estimated by taking the audited ending balance for the prior fiscal year, adding to the forecasted sources for the current fiscal year, and subtracting the forecasted uses for the current fiscal year. 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ (18,712) $ (18,712) $ (22,218) $ (22,218) Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ $ 376,162 376,162 $ $ 566,100 566,100 $ $ 566,100 566,100 $ $ 355,391 355,391 $ $ 349,000 349,000 $ $ $ $ 20,000 335,391 355,391 $ $ 566,100 566,100 $ $ 566,100 566,100 $ 349,000 349,000 (20,000) $ - $ - Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 398,381 398,381 Structural Balance $ - $ - $ - $ Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ (22,218) $ (22,218) $ (18,712) $ (18,712) $ (18,712) $ (18,712) $ - (22,218) (22,218) $ $ (22,218) (22,218) The Flood Control Grants Fund receives grant revenue. Grant revenue is received as a reimbursement which results in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 37,521,531 $ 34,447,306 $ 34,447,306 $ 31,777,747 $ 26,043,506 $ $ $ 53,865,759 53,865,759 $ $ 56,637,000 56,637,000 $ $ 56,637,000 56,637,000 $ $ 348,341 46,614,451 46,962,792 $ 61,820,533 61,820,533 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ 52,706,609 52,706,609 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ 59,600,000 59,600,000 $ $ 50,000,000 50,000,000 Structural Balance $ 348,341 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 33 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 31,777,747 31,777,747 $ $ 31,084,306 31,084,306 $ $ 31,084,306 31,084,306 $ $ 26,043,506 26,043,506 $ $ 37,864,039 37,864,039 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 51,950,161 $ 50,776,728 $ 50,776,728 $ 49,544,757 $ 33,642,377 $ 71,949,894 71,949,894 $ 63,887,129 34,800 63,921,929 $ 63,887,129 34,800 63,921,929 $ 64,141,276 20,584 64,161,860 $ 54,511,087 54,511,087 $ $ $ $ $ 34,355,300 40,000,000 74,355,300 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ 36,860,323 45,000,000 81,860,323 37,594,594 $ $ 2 $ $ 49,544,757 49,544,757 $ $ $ 36,860,323 45,000,000 81,860,323 27,026,806 $ $ - $ $ 32,838,334 32,838,334 $ $ $ 35,064,240 45,000,000 80,064,240 $ 33,775,369 54,098,533 87,873,902 27,026,806 $ 29,077,036 $ 20,735,718 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 32,838,334 32,838,334 $ $ 33,642,377 33,642,377 $ $ 279,562 279,562 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Grants Fund (989) NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 566,100 $ 566,100 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 566,100 $ 566,100 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ (217,100) $ (217,100) (217,100) (217,100) $ 349,000 $ 349,000 Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Grant Reconciliation Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue NON-RECURRING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 60,000,000 $ 56,637,000 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 60,000,000 $ 56,637,000 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 60,000,000 $ 56,637,000 $ (10,000,000) $ (10,000,000) - 5,183,533 (3,915,000) 9,098,533 $ 50,000,000 $ 61,820,533 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 36,860,323 $ 63,887,129 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 36,860,323 $ 63,887,129 $ (3,408) $ (3,408) - $ - Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Adjust Hours Per FTE General Revenues Property Taxes Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Property Taxes $ 36,856,915 $ 57,938,844 $ 6,323 $ 6,323 (2,188,307) $ (2,188,307) - $ - (731,585) (731,585) (2,076,172) (2,076,172) $ 34,674,931 $ -5.9% 55,131,087 -4.8% $ (899,562) $ (815,845) (620,000) (620,000) Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2013 Tentative Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Orthophotography to OET & Public Work s Re-Org Internal Service Charges (5,948,285) (5,948,285) Agenda Item: $ (815,845) (83,717) FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 33,775,369 $ -8.4% Expenditures 54,511,087 -5.9% Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 45,000,000 $ 34,800 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 45,000,000 $ 34,800 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 45,000,000 $ 34,800 $ 9,098,533 $ 9,098,533 - $ - (34,800) (34,800) Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Non Recurring Carry Forward Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget $ 35 54,098,533 $ - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by A.R.S. Title 48 in accordance with District Resolution 2010R008, which specifies the Board’s financial management directives for the District. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Readiness • Hazard Mitigation Need • Federal Cost Share • Municipal Cost Share The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 3 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2013, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: Previous 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS APS ES ESCO IMPROVEMENTS SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROG FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP Project Total $ $ Actuals 550,504 $ 1,494,925 1,400,870 158,318,701 161,765,000 $ Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total - $ 1,856,457 36,852 57,608,598 59,501,907 $ - $ 2,000,000 20,000 47,980,000 50,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 43,000,000 45,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 40,000,000 42,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 40,000,000 42,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 40,000,000 42,000,000 $ Total - $ 10,000,000 20,000 210,980,000 221,000,000 $ Project 550,504 13,351,382 1,457,722 426,907,299 442,266,907 Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • • Dam Safety Flood Control Capital Projects Result Measures: Measure Percent of District dams identified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources with no dam safety deficiencies FY 2011 Actual 72.7% FY 2012 Forecast 72.7% FY 2013 Projected with Capital Improvement 68.2% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 689 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP; projects projected for FY 2013 completion will benefit 70 square miles. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Flood Control District Project Partners: See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Upper Camelback Wash Improvements Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements Laveen Area Conveyance Channel th 27 Ave. & South Mountain Ave. Basin rd 43 Ave. & Baseline Rd. Basin Berneil Channel Modifications Rittenhouse Basin Chandler Heights Basin East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Tres Rios White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation McMicken Dam Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain Watson Drainage System SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements Spook Hill FRS / SR-202L Modification PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction Saddleback FRS Modifications Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation Cave Buttes Dam Modifications Cave Buttes Access Rights Acquisition New River Dam Outlet Improvements Oak St. Detention Basin and Storm Drain Ellsworth Rd. & McKellips Rd. Drainage System th Pinnacle Peak Rd. Channel (99 Ave. to Agua Fria River) th th 115 Ave., Union Hills Dr. & 107 Ave. Drainage Improvements White Tanks FRS No.3 Outlet Channel Lower El Mirage Wash Basin Bullard Wash (Phase II) Loop 303 Drainage Improvements Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) th DRCC (107 Ave. to Agua Fria) 39 District Scheduled Completion 1 2 4 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 4 5 4 3 3 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2017 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2017 FY 2015 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2017 FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2015 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2015 FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Improvement th District Scheduled Completion 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 2 1, 2 N/A FY 2016 FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 N/A th DRCC (75 Ave. to 107 Ave.) th th Camelback Road Storm Drain (59 Ave. to 75 Ave.) th Van Buren St. Channel (99 Ave. to Agua Fria River) th th Bethany Home Rd. Storm Drain (79 Ave. to 59 Ave.) Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback Rd. to Lafayette Blvd.) Lafayette Interceptor Drain & Outlet Ashbrook Wash Channelization East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tailwater system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. The District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement for design and construction of the project; however, the project has been delayed due to a lack of City funding. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for FY 2017. Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation (027A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. Project design is in progress, under the City’s lead, with the District providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2009A006. Construction, by the City, is expected to begin during FY 2013. The District is providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2011A010. 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Construction schedule is dependent upon City funding. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (117A) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel improved the Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility capable of containing and conveying a 100-year flood event in the Laveen area from 43rd Avenue to the Salt River – a distance of approximately 5.8 miles. An associated flood detention basin at 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue mitigates peak flood flows getting to the conveyance channel. The peak discharge at the outfall of the channel for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be 2,800 cubic feet per second. The channel and basin are grass-lined, and a concrete low-flow channel carries tailwater to the Salt River. This project was constructed by a public-private partnership involving the Flood Control District, City of Phoenix, Maricopa County Department of Transportation and the Salt River Project. The District's project involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project rights-ofway condemnations, and the project is being maintained by the City of Phoenix. 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin (117C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. Project design is in progress. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road Basin (117D) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road. Project design is in progress. Construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2013. Berneil Channel Modifications Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley The Berneil Channel is operated and maintained by the Town of Paradise Valley and generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at approximately the 66th Street alignment. The channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. The Town submitted a project for modification of the Berneil Channel to the District’s prioritization procedure, and the project was recommended. Ideally, a modification project would increase channel capacity to convey the 100-year event, but funding constraints may limit capacity improvements to address 10-year events. The Town has completed a preliminary project study. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is largely dependent upon the availability of Town and District funding. Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Construction of Rittenhouse Basin flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. Chandler Heights Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in at least five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as funding becomes available. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will purchase an easement on the completed basin site, fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations in the future. Project is dependent upon the Town of Gilbert schedule and funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Project Partner: N/A The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications; however, should the issues remain, the District would construct a concrete low flow channel along much of the length of the EMF. Tres Rios (126A) Project Partners: City of Phoenix, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila Rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands, open water marshes and riparian corridors, and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2 million in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The levee design and construction will occur in three phases – from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and along 123rd to Southern Avenue. Construction of all three phases is complete. A Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway is being prepared and will be submitted to FEMA in FY 2013. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Due to the slowing of development in the area subsequent to the ADMP, the ADMP-recommended project now lacks a viable project partner for implementation. The District has initiated design of a storm drain outlet that will solely accomplish the District’s dam safety needs. Remaining regional flows may be addressed by a future ADMP update. Project design is in progress. White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (then Soil Conservation Service). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004, and the District has entered into an IGA with NRCS to accomplish project construction. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is in progress. Phase II will utilize a Construction Manager at Risk contract and is expected to begin during FY 2013. McMicken Dam Project (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately nine miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) that discharges to the Agua Fria River. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has pursued, and continues to pursue, federal funding assistance for this project. Should such funding be non-viable, the District may evaluate the potential of initiating a unilateral project. Design is in progress, and construction will be accomplished in multiple phases. Ongoing efforts are taking place to include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Since its construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The District completed a planning-level assessment of potential alternatives, including a modified dam, a channel/levee system and combinations of both providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Design is in progress, and construction will be accomplished in two phases. Phase one will utilize a Construction Manager at Risk contract and is expected to begin in FY 2013. Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Design is complete, and construction will be accomplished in multiple phases as Town funding becomes available. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Watson Drainage System (211B) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Town of Buckeye submitted the full ADMP-recommended plan to the District’s FY 2012 prioritization procedure, and the plan was recommended. The Watson System will be the first to be implemented. The schedule for final design and construction is dependent upon a viable design solution and Town funding ability. SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Oglesby System’s outfall would be constructed as a co-use Arizona Department of Transportation/District facility, built in conjunction with State Route 85 (SR-85) improvements from north of Baseline Road to the Gila River. ADOT has tentatively agreed to this plan, which would require ADOT to upsize its planned freeway channel to accommodate regional flows in exchange for District cost share participation. The portion of the Oglesby System upstream of SR-85 would be completed in the future – likely without the use of public funding – as the area develops. Project schedule will depend upon ADOT’s SR-85 improvement schedule. Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The City initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District With the City as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the selection of an outfall alignment south of McKellips Road by the SRPMIC. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is driven by City funding authorization under a future City bond election. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Spook Hill FRS / Red Mountain Freeway Modification (300A) Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation Spook Hill FRS is a structural plan element of a Watershed Work Plan, prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) in January 1963, for the Buckhorn-Mesa Watershed Project located in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The dam was designed to impound floodwaters for a 100-year flood event and direct flows in excess of the 100-year flood event through an emergency spillway. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) was the lead agency in an effort to modify Spook Hill FRS to accommodate construction of the Power Road to University Drive segment of the Loop 202, which passes over the dam and within the dam's floodway. Modifications were completed in FY 2009 and corrected all identified dam safety deficiencies through installation of a central filter throughout the dam to protect against cracking, slope erosion repair, and replacement of the principal spillway. The District will provide easements to ADOT on District land, generating revenue that is expected to completely offset its $5 million contribution to the modification costs. Easement value is under legal negotiation, and the project remains active pending settlement. PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS), the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the Loop 202. The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. The FFMA recommended rehabilitation of the structures which could include structural improvements to the dam or replacement of the dams with channels, basins or other flood control facilities. The study to propose an ultimate recommended solution for the structures is complete. Alternative selection is in progress and the rehabilitation plan began in FY 2012. The District continues pursue federal cost share funding, with construction occurring beyond the five-year CIP. 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation (310B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate reservoir storage monitoring and warning procedures have been put in place for this sitespecific condition at the dam. Site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, are required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall rehabilitation or replacement. Construction of the interim dam safety measures began in FY 2012. Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction (330A) Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS is a compact earth-fill dam which detains floodwater from the southwest side of the Big Horn Mountains, the Harquahala Plain and Saddle Mountain. The water is conveyed to the Harquahala Floodway and the Saddleback Diversion Channel and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 11.5 miles in length. Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides a comprehensive rock mulch and hydroseed treatment for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon District funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: N/A The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for the initial construction. Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Design of modifications is in progress. Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation (343A) Project Partner: Town of Wickenburg The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The project provides a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It also conveys the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction was completed in FY 2009. The project remains active pending FEMA acceptance of revised floodplain limits. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to FEMA coordination. Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: N/A Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Pre-design/alternatives development is in progress. Cave Buttes Dam Additional Access Rights Acquisition (350A) Project Partner: N/A A survey of District land rights identified additional rights required for operations and maintenance access to Cave Buttes Dam. The District intends to acquire a roadway easement from the Arizona State Land Department. Acquisition is expected to occur during FY 2012. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to the Right-of-Way coordination. New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370A) Project Partner: N/A The District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the New River Dam and associated works in 1985 as part of the New River and Phoenix City Streams Flood Control Project, providing enhanced flood protection for downstream Maricopa County residents, and the District operates and maintains the dam. Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. Design is complete. Construction is dependent upon District funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to the ongoing coordination with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Design is complete. Construction schedule will depend upon District and City funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project is the fourth scheduled project in support of this ADMP and likely will include construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. A design concept study is complete. The project’s implementation schedule will depend upon District and City funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Pinnacle Peak Rd. Drainage (99th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (450D) Project Partner: City of Peoria The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale/Peoria ADMP Update (ADMPU) to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMPU recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from 87th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The City of Peoria is accomplishing the 100-year conveyance drainage component from 87th Avenue to 99th Avenue through development stipulations. This project provides for drainage from 99th Avenue west to an ultimate outfall in the Agua Fria River. The project will also provide roadway improvements along this alignment to be paid for by the City of Peoria. 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Construction and the District's project involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project Rights-of-way condemnations. The project is being maintained by the City of Peoria. 115th Avenue, Union Hills Drive and 107th Avenue Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Peoria, City of Surprise The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will likely include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The design concept report is complete. Project implementation is awaiting execution of an intergovernmental agreement between the District and Cities of Peoria and Surprise. Project design is scheduled to begin in FY 2013. White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel (470F) Project Partner: N/A In FY 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No.4. This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No.3 to White Tanks FRS No.4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Bethany Home Road south to Interstate 10, the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. Construction is in progress. Lower El Mirage Wash Basin (470K) Project Partner: City of El Mirage The Lower El Mirage Wash Basin is located in the Lower Agua Fria watershed and is included in the Loop 303/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP). The City of El Mirage identified flooding issues along Lower El Mirage Wash from just north of Cactus Road southeast through Pueblo El Mirage to the Agua Fria. The watershed for this study area is 12.25 square miles of the Lower Agua Fria watershed. The primary goal of the project is to develop a 100-year regional outfall for the area and mitigate flooding hazards in a delineated floodway/floodplain. The project consists of the completion of a detention basin in Lower El Mirage Wash, located at the southwest corner of Cactus Road and El Mirage Road, along with new culverts at El Mirage and Cactus Roads. Project implementation is awaiting execution of an intergovernmental agreement between the District and the City of El Mirage. Design is expected to begin in FY 2012. Construction is scheduled for FY 2013. 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This storm water would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to Interstate 10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City of Goodyear funding and will likely be phased, with work being completed outside the five-year CIP. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for stormwater management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with Loop 303. Under the District’s agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the District will be responsible for project implementation from Van Buren Street south to the Gila River, while ADOT will be responsible for project implementation the project north of Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will precede construction Loop 303. Design is in progress. Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (470H) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, City of Glendale The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)/Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from Loop 303 to Reems Road and outlets to the existing Dysart Drain. The project serves both roadway drainage and regional flood control purposes, providing 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with MCDOT and the City of Glendale. Construction is in progress by MCDOT. The District is contributing cost share to the regional flood control features of the project under IGA FCD 2010A008. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Luke Air Force Base Flood Mitigation Improvements Project Partner: Luke Air Force Base This project is an element generated from the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan Update. The project will mitigate an existing delineated flooding hazard on and adjacent to Luke Air Force Base (AFB). Approximately 250 acres of on-base facilities within existing flood zones will be removed from the floodplain which includes aircraft hangars, command posts, control tower, simulator complex, dorms and drinking wells. An additional 300 acres of commercial/industrial/agricultural property south of the base limits would be protected. The project includes rehabilitating and improving the existing storm drain system to collect and convey 100-year flows from sensitive areas on the base to the improved channel system contain those flows within the channel system and provide a connection to the existing regional outfall. The District anticipates executing an intergovernmental agreement with Luke AFB for this project in FY 2013 and initiating design efforts. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, Town of Queen Creek The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2009, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The channel will collect and convey the 100-year flow to reduce flooding hazards to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. Under the project cost share agreement, the District will construct improvements upstream (west and northwest) of Ellsworth Road, and the Town of Queen Creek will construct improvements downstream of Ellsworth Road. The District will additionally construct a bridge over Sonoqui Wash at Riggs Road, with bridge costs to be reimbursed by MCDOT. Construction of the District’s reach of the project is in progress. Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: Pinal County The Queen Creek / Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of channelization has been completed. The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization will outfall to the second phase, which is being implemented by the District in partnership with the Town of Queen Creek. The third phase includes channelization of the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northeast to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is generally located in unincorporated Maricopa County and in Pinal County. The District anticipates partnering with Pinal County to share in features that serve to both improve the project’s ability to capture flows and to 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District provide an outlet for future Pinal County improvements. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Design is in progress. Construction will be completed in two phases, the first of which is expected to begin in FY 2013. Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) (480B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash from Recker to Higley roads to complete channel improvements that have already been accomplished upstream of Recker and downstream of Higley. This project replaces the existing wash with a natural desert 100-year capacity channel. Project design and construction are complete with the exception of landscaping, and the project is owned, operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active pending future completion of landscape and aesthetic enhancements by the Town. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the FY 2003 Prioritization Procedure, and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. Project implementation is awaiting an IGA between the District and the City of Avondale. Advancement is largely dependent upon the availability of City and District funding. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will construct basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Upon completion, the project will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. Design is in progress. Van Buren Street Channel (99th Avenue to Agua Fria River) Project Partner: City of Avondale This project, proposed by the City of Avondale, will provide a drainage outlet along Van Buren Street, conveying flows to the Agua Fria River.In addition to alleviating an existing flooding hazard at the 99th Avenue and Van Buren Street intersection, the project would provide an outlet for Avondale’s future city center. The District is completing a design concept study, as the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. The study has been completed. Future phases and schedule is dependent upon execution of an intergovernmental agreement and City funding availability. Camelback Road Storm Drain (59th Avenue to 75th Avenue) (620F) Project Partner: City of Glendale and City of Phoenix The Camelback Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the cities of Phoenix and Glendale. The project consists of a trunk line in Camelback Road with capacity for a 10-year storm event and lateral storm drains aiding in collection. The storm drain ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. Construction was completed during FY 2012. The project remains active for the preparation of a Letter of Map Revision revising the flood boundary and floodway and subsequent FEMA approval. Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale The Bethany Home Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The City of Glendale is the lead agency for project design and construction. Design of the storm drain from approximately 71st Avenue to 79th Avenue is in progress by the City of Glendale, and construction timing will be dependent upon City and District funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The FY 2008 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project’s design involves the installation of various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. When combined with the complete downtown system recommended by the ADMP, this project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. Construction of the Fillmore Street components and of a Jefferson Street sub-phase is in progress by the City. The District is contributing 50% of the project costs under IGA FCD 2009A009. Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback to Lafayette) (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase includes construction of an outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvements Project, which is complete. Additional phases will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard, intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. This project will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. City funding for this future phase will likely require future bond elections, and schedule would be dependent on funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Lafayette Interceptor Drain and Outlet (625M) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase includes construction of an outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvements Project. Later phases will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard, intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. Lafayette Boulevard improvements are currently in design. Construction is anticipated to begin in FY 2013. Ashbrook Wash Channelization Project Partner: Town of Fountain Hills Ashbrook Wash is the largest watercourse within the Town of Fountain Hills, having a watershed area of 13.06 square miles. The District’s 1995 Floodplain Delineation Study for Fountain Hills showed deficiencies at the Golden Eagle Park Dam on Ashbrook Wash, due to overtopping and potential dam failure. Dam safety improvements were made to the Golden Eagle Park Dam in year 2000 to prevent its overtopping and failure in the 1/2 Probable Maximum Flood. However, those improvements increased the regulatory 100-year peak flow downstream. The project will provide channel improvements to convey increased flood flow from the upstream dam and prevent the flooding of 13 residential properties, at the 100-year storm, adjacent to this wash reach. 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Improvements include replacement of corrugated metal pipes with new reinforced concrete box culverts, channel excavation, flood walls and re-vegetation. Design and construction timing is dependent upon the execution of an intergovernmental agreement and availability of District and Town funding. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately owned golf courses. Phase one of maintenance road improvements is complete. Future enhancements are dependent upon District funding availability. The FY 2013 budget includes labor costs related to the continued design of the project. Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve (FCPR) Project Partner: N/A The project reserve provides contingency funding for unforeseen schedule or cost estimate changes. Auxiliary Budget Line (FCIP) Project Partner: N/A Several District projects did not have accounting lines at the time of this document’s preparation. Budget system restrictions prevent budgets for these projects from being represented here. Collective budgets for these projects are represented by the FCIP line item, and are further detailed below: FCIP Bemeil Channel Modifications (120) East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel (121) SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel (211) 115th Ave., Union Hills Dr. & 107th Ave. Draingage Improvements (450) Luke Airforce Base Flood Mitigation Improvements (470) Van Buren St. Channel (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) (565) Ashbrook Wash Channelization (670) Project Total $ $ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 - $ 285,000 225,000 510,000 $ 57 - $ 410,000 500,000 910,000 $ Year 4 Year 5 FY 2016 FY 2017 - $ 10,000 $ 25,000 $ 10,000 15,000 450,000 1,175,000 3,725,000 250,000 5,000 15,000 15,000 30,000 565,000 125,000 730,000 $ 1,755,000 $ 3,930,000 $ 5-Year Total 35,000 10,000 15,000 6,055,000 1,020,000 15,000 720,000 7,870,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source INTERGOVERNMENTAL Project Total Cost by Sub-Project 0220132 CENTRAL CHANDLER DRNG 0271032 UPPER CAMELBACK WASH 0430130 CLOUD AND SOSSAMAN BSN 109 02 30 AGUA FRIA LEVEE IMP 1090130 VULCAN SETTLEMENT ACQ 1170831 LAVEEN AREA CONV CHAN 1170931 23RD AVE AND ROESER RD 1170932 27TH AVE AND SOUTH MTN 1170933 43RD AVE AND BASELINE 1210332 RITTENHOUSE BASIN 1210333 CHANDLER HEIGHTS BASIN 1260131 TRES RIOS 2010131 WHITE TANKS 4 OUTLET 2010231 WHITE TANKS 4 REHAB 2020231 MCMICKEN DAM PROJECT 2070131 BUCKEYE 1 REHAB 2110331 DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE 2110530 BUCKEYE WATSON SYSTEM 2650130 GRANITE REEF WASH 3000131 SPOOK HILL FRS REHAB 3100130 PVR REHABILITATION 3100131 POWERLINE FRS IDSM 3300130 HARQUAHALA EROSION 3310130 SADDLEBACK FRS MOD 3430131 WICKENBURG DOWNTOWN 3500131 CAVE BUTTES ADDL LAND 3500130 CAVE BUTTES DAM MOD 3700130 NEW RIVER DAM OUTLET 4200431 OAK ST BASIN AND ST DR 4200531 ELLSWORTH MCKELLIPS 4421131 SIPHON DRAW DRAINAGE 4500232 ROSE GARDEN LN CHANNEL 4500631 PINNACLE PK AND 99TH 4700430 WHITE TANKS 3 REHAB 4701231 REEMS RD 4701331 BULLARD WASH PH II 4701431 LOOP 303 DRAINAGE 4700432 WHITE TANKS 3 OUTLET 4701531 NORTHERN PKWY PH I 4701132 LOWER EL MIRAGE WASH 4800531 QUEEN CK RKR TO HIGLEY 4800432 SONOQUI WASH PH II 4800434 SONOQUI WASH PH III 5650431 75TH AVE STDR AND DRCC 5650432 DRCC AVONDALE 5650433 DRCC ELWOOD 75 TO 107 6200333 CAMELBACK 59TH TO 75TH 6200334 BETHANY 79TH TO 59TH 6250130 DOWNTOWN PHOENIX PH I 6250230 OLD CROSSCUT AZ CANAL 6250232 ARCADIA DR STRM DRAN 6250233 LAFAYETTE DRAIN 6981030 EMF MAINT RD IMP FLOOD CONTROL CIP PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total Project $ 19,381,186 $ $ 19,381,186 $ 8,831,286 $ 8,831,286 $ 7,722,000 $ 15,015,000 $ 10,937,000 $ 7,722,000 $ 15,015,000 $ 10,937,000 $ 1,780,000 $ 1,780,000 $ 2,450,000 $ 66,116,472 $ 132,232,944 2,450,000 $ 66,116,472 $ 132,232,944 Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total Project 3,049 $ 279,931 2,759,572 1,162,027 1,951,013 14,320 9,932 8,722,327 3,039,006 419,390 461,206 2,576,195 530,844 990,430 1,023,147 727,529 1,465,261 798,409 435 346,666 10,425,002 783,158 471,989 4,334 527,257 122,392 6,444,255 4,330,120 4,744,994 25,629,537 12,428,077 92,224 7,757,877 7,842,549 822,982 450,841 9,863,725 2,500,474 15,046,365 89,794 5,271,834 10,028,370 7,772 2,290,965 2,258,835 318,682 483,608 158,318,701 $ $ 22,611 777,814 3,632 4,625 30,559 164,212 56,758 1,287 1,086,046 248,448 2,155,406 176,492 293,676 126 192,455 162,097 116,543 82 505,929 4,169 98,638 5,173 99,874 822 5,687 655 1,269,653 917,037 111,615 2,524 975,815 9,908,473 4,928 85 3,829,756 655,507 62,195 2,754 335,924 2,174,274 3,212 2,459 22,843 372,525 3,859 30,739,344 57,608,598 $ 5,000 $ 4,450,000 5,000 30,000 110,000 765,000 1,000 5,000 10,000 30,000 1,215,000 715,000 3,320,000 5,000 470,000 10,000 6,000 370,000 5,290,000 5,000 445,000 15,000 5,000 600,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 36,000 5,000 1,236,000 1,945,000 3,960,000 1,120,000 1,000 340,000 9,650,000 5,000 10,000 50,000 5,000 1,355,000 5,000 7,895,000 5,000 510,000 1,950,000 47,980,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 58 5,000 $ 2,255,000 5,000 1,275,000 1,000 5,000 25,000 10,800,000 1,110,000 6,755,000 10,000 550,000 430,000 1,150,000 10,000 5,000 270,000 640,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 11,000,000 80,000 950,000 1,000 1,650,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,375,000 10,000 68,000 5,000 910,000 1,615,000 43,000,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 1,000 5,000 80,000 8,300,000 1,525,000 6,650,000 80,000 60,000 260,000 1,150,000 5,000 20,000 4,750,000 890,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,985,000 1,000 5,000 3,100,000 5,000 23,000 10,000 730,000 1,340,000 40,000,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 1,000 10,000 8,800,000 10,825,000 1,675,000 200,000 1,318,000 2,550,000 1,150,000 40,000 125,000 140,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 35,000 1,000 1,200,000 10,000 8,250,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 1,755,000 1,825,000 40,000,000 $ 225,000 $ 5,000 3,000,000 1,000 10,000 3,900,000 5,000,000 10,000 2,410,000 3,123,000 2,550,000 350,000 350,000 5,725,000 3,585,000 15,000 15,000 65,000 1,000 4,290,000 15,000 15,000 25,000 10,000 3,930,000 1,375,000 40,000,000 $ 250,000 $ 6,705,000 25,000 30,000 3,110,000 2,040,000 5,000 35,000 10,000 12,835,000 20,315,000 19,175,000 18,410,000 2,705,000 5,521,000 5,800,000 6,000 4,170,000 5,300,000 405,000 6,585,000 15,000 5,000 9,715,000 900,000 40,000 40,000 36,000 90,000 23,256,000 1,945,000 4,040,000 2,070,000 5,000 340,000 16,790,000 40,000 11,365,000 50,000 40,000 2,730,000 88,000 7,963,000 40,000 7,835,000 8,105,000 210,980,000 $ 253,049 7,007,542 3,537,386 25,000 3,632 1,196,652 1,981,572 3,288,532 2,106,690 8,728,614 3,074,006 1,515,436 13,544,654 25,046,601 19,882,336 19,694,106 3,728,147 5,521,126 5,800,000 925,984 5,797,358 6,214,952 405,517 7,437,595 10,444,171 788,158 10,285,627 909,507 667,131 163,214 6,449,942 4,330,775 6,050,647 26,546,574 12,539,692 184,748 31,989,692 19,696,022 4,867,910 2,070,000 455,926 14,033,481 19,945,981 15,108,560 132,548 16,972,758 12,252,644 50,984 5,023,424 2,281,678 88,000 8,654,207 527,467 38,574,344 8,105,000 426,907,299 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects th Beardsley Road and 55 Avenue Drainage Improvements Gilbert Road & Decatur Street Drainage Improvements Circle K Park Drainage Improvements nd 22 Street and Southern Avenue Drainage Improvements th 16 Drive and Bell Road Drainage Improvements th st Crittenden Lane – 45 Avenue to 51 Avenue Storm Drain th th Montebello Avenue – 12 Street to 15 Street Storm Drain th Arizona Traditions Outfall Channel at 175 Avenue and Bell Road District Scheduled Completion All 4 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 N/A FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. Beardsley Road and 55th Avenue Drainage Improvements (699S) Project Partner: City of Glendale The City of Glendale proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring sixth among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of one residential property and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Gilbert Road and Decatur Street Drainage Improvements (699T) Project Partner: City of Mesa The City of Mesa proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring eighth among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. 59 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of one residential property and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Circle K Park Drainage Improvements (699U) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring fifth among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of one residential property, damage to the Highline Canal and erosion to City park property. 22nd Street and Southern Avenue Drainage Improvements (699V) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring third among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of seven residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 16th Drive and Bell Road Drainage Improvements (699W) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring first among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties, one multifamily unit property and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Crittenden Lane: 45th Avenue to 51st Avenue Storm Drain (699X) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring seventh among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of four residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Montebello Avenue: 12th Street to 15th Street Storm Drain (699Y) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring fourth among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of seven residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Arizona Traditions Outfall Channel at 175th Avenue and Bell Road (699Z) Project Partner: City of Surprise The City of Surprise proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2013. The project was recommended, scoring second among sixteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Fund/Costing Summary: Cost by Sub-Project 699 11 30 BROADWAY RD AND 72ND 699 11 31 BROADWAY DRN W MESA 699 11 32 41ST PL CHARTER OAK 699 11 33 CAMPBELL STROM DRN 699 11 34 15TH AND DOBBINS CH 699 11 36 JERRY ST DRN IMPROVE 6991231 CAVE CREEK FLD HZD RD 6991236 BETHANY HM AND 5TH AVE 6991237 69TH PL AND AVALON DR 6991238 69TH PL AND WINDSOR 6991239 3201 N 66TH ST 6991330 Beardsley & 55th Ave 6991331 Gilbert & Decatur St 6991332 Circle K Park 6991333 22nd St & Southern 6991334 16th Drive & Bell 6991335 Crittenden Lane 6991336 Montebello & 15 St 6991338 175th Ave & Bell SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE PRGM $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total Project 250,175 $ 250,025 250,077 250,055 250,000 244,593 1,494,925 $ $ 1,034 57 227 111 84 1,854,944 1,856,457 $ $ 63,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 53,000 366,000 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ 63,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 53,000 8,366,000 10,000,000 $ 250,175 250,025 250,077 250,055 250,000 244,593 1,034 57 227 111 84 63,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 253,000 53,000 10,220,944 13,351,382 Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. Flood Control District Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District None Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Unallocated Floodprone Properties Acquisitions Rhodes (503-32-106) District Scheduled Completion All 4 N/A FY 2013 Purpose Statement: The Floodprone Properties Assistance Program provides limited District funding for acquisition and demolition of floodprone homes that cannot feasibly or cost-effectively be protected by structural projects. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Descriptions: Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects Using objective criteria, the Floodprone Properties Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. Rhodes (503-32-106) (700M) The Rhodes property was recommended for acquisition/demolition under the FY 2011 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program evaluation process. The property is in the process of being acquired, and demolition and relocation are anticipated to be completed by FY 2013. Fund/Costing Summary: Cost by Sub-Project 700 09 30 FPAP LADD 700 09 31 FPAP WELNA 700 09 32 FPAP STURTEVANT 700 09 33 FPAP ALCORN 700 09 34 FPAP LIGHT 700 09 35 FPAP MILLER 700 09 36 FPAP COLLIER FPAP DELOZIER 209 04 070B FPAP FLANAGAN 201 21 041C 7001032 FPAP BIBLE 7001130 FPAP COX 7001131 FPAP RHODES 7001132 FPAP SCHIFELING FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total Project 124,297 $ 180,778 279,729 1,950 110,026 334,516 117,744 50,383 17,761 169,277 6,296 4,448 3,665 1,400,870 $ $ 18,191 1,572 2,089 15,000 36,852 $ $ 20,000 20,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: No additional funds are being requested. 62 - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 20,000 20,000 $ 124,297 180,778 279,729 1,950 110,026 334,516 117,744 50,383 17,761 187,468 7,868 26,537 3,665 15,000 1,457,722 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Approve the Library District FY 2013 Budget in the amount of $25,627,596 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Library District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Library District’s FY 2013 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District revenue budget for FY 2013 is $21,477,596 and expenditure budget for FY 2013 is $25,627,596. The tax levy will decrease from $19,070,066 in FY 2012 to $16,925,024 in FY 2013. The tax rate will remain flat at $0.0492 per $100 of assessed value. The net assessed value is decreasing by $4,359,840,998 from FY 2012 to FY 2013. Due to the reduction in property tax revenue, the reciprocal borrowing program with cities will be funded through non recurring sources as funding is available. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2011 through FY 2013 $22,000,000 $20,168,753 $20,000,000 Use of the District library facilities continues to grow for traditional services as well as electronic services, which allows the library user to download music and books. The District is working on providing downloadable movies as well. The FY 2013 budget also includes onetime expenditure authority that will allow the District to convert the last four branches to the Deweyless system. $18,879,365 $18,000,000 $16,721,924 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Recommended I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 18, 2012, the Maricopa County Board of Directors adopted the FY 2013 Budget totaling $25,627,596. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. On August 20, 2012, the Maricopa County Board of Directors approved the FY 2013 Tax Levy and rates. 65 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Carmine L. Davis, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: Customer satisfaction was 86.7% in FY 2011 with the library's collection of books and other materials. The FY 2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey will commence in April 2012. Individual Empowerment Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: The Summer Reading Program in 2011 saw 32,384 children and teens registered. Pre-readers (0-5) had a 52.11% completion rate, Kids (6-11) had a 47.68% completion rate and Teens (12-18) had a 54.64% completion rate. Department Specific By June 30, 2015, the Library District will provide the Polaris Integrated Library System to 3 additional independent public libraries in the County. Status: The District is in discussions with one of the independent public libraries within the County on an agreement to provide this service. The Library District is currently providing Polaris to Avondale, Buckeye, Desert Foothill (Carefree & Cave Creek), Mesa, Tolleson, Wickenburg and Youngtown. Other identified candidates have been discussed, such as the City of Glendale. Department Specific By June 30, 2013, provide library materials and automation system interface in a 3rd language. Language chosen will be determined using 2010 Census data. Status: The Library District is awaiting release of the language information from the 2010 Census, which will be available in Summer 2012. 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 14,714,918 $ $ 1,660,429 $ - $ - $ 16,721,924 $ - $ 320,352 3,406,451 23,629 716,270 100,000 188,970 1,399,725 (1,399,725) 22,877,321 $ (1,399,725) $ 16,721,924 320,352 3,406,451 23,629 716,270 100,000 188,970 21,477,596 1,230,986 10,564,918 1,230,986 $ 10,564,918 $ 11,795,904 (11,795,904) 11,795,904 $ (11,795,904) $ - 34,673,225 $ - TOTAL 16,375,347 TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,108,307 $ 10,564,918 $ 16,375,347 ELIMINATIONS $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 16,721,924 $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 320,352 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,406,451 OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES 23,629 FINES & FORFEITS 716,270 INTEREST EARNINGS 100,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 188,970 TRANSFERS IN 1,399,725 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 22,877,321 $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES SUBTOTAL $ (13,195,629) $ 21,477,596 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 11,159,968 $ SUPPLIES 6,129,645 SERVICES 4,187,983 OTHER FINANCING USES 1,399,725 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 22,877,321 $ - $ - $ 11,159,968 $ - $ 6,129,645 4,187,983 1,399,725 (1,399,725) 22,877,321 $ (1,399,725) $ 11,159,968 6,129,645 4,187,983 21,477,596 NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 212,577 $ SUPPLIES 2,187,423 SERVICES 1,750,000 OTHER FINANCING USES 11,795,904 TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 15,945,904 $ - $ - $ 212,577 $ - $ 2,187,423 1,750,000 11,795,904 (11,795,904) 15,945,904 $ (11,795,904) $ 212,577 2,187,423 1,750,000 4,150,000 TOTAL USES $ 38,823,225 $ - $ 38,823,225 $ (13,195,629) $ 25,627,596 - $ 12,225,347 $ 12,225,347 $ 12,225,347 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 68 - $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2012 ADOPTED 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2012 REVISED FY 2013 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 19,401,590 $ 20,401,590 $ 18,362,225 $ 2,039,365 2,431,000 2,467,591 14,714,918 (12,247,327) $ 21,832,590 $ 22,869,181 $ 33,077,143 $ (10,207,962) $ 83,564 $ 228,775 $ - $ $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ $ - $ - $ $ (1,866,300) (1,230,986) (3,097,286) - $ (1,399,725) $ 1,399,725 (11,795,904) 11,795,904 - $ (13,195,629) $ 13,195,629 $ 24,564,950 $ 25,746,752 $ 25,627,596 $ 69 228,775 119,156 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $25,627,596 Fund Balance $4,150,000 16% Intergovernmental & Grants $3,750,432 15% Property Taxes $16,721,924 65% Miscellaneous & Interest $288,970 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $716,270 3% Information Technology $2,574,608 10% Uses of Funds $25,627,596 Administrative Services $2,548,928 10% Public Library Service $20,504,060 80% 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2011 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 4,237,196 $ 4,237,196 $ 3,882,868 $ 3,882,868 $ 4,059,459 $ 4,059,459 $ 4,228,069 $ 4,228,069 $ 4,311,691 $ 4,311,691 $ 252,232 252,232 6.2% 6.2% FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 50,000 100.0% 100.0% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 20,527,789 $ 20,527,789 $ 19,199,717 $ 19,199,717 $ 19,199,717 $ 19,199,717 $ 19,247,120 $ 19,247,120 $ 17,042,276 $ 17,042,276 $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,769,985 $ 23,156,214 $ 23,332,805 $ 23,523,818 $ 21,477,596 $ (2,157,441) (2,157,441) (1,855,209) -11.2% -11.2% 0.0% 0.0% -8.0% USES MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 20,725,609 $ 20,725,609 $ 19,693,447 $ 19,693,447 $ 20,832,090 $ 20,832,090 $ 20,266,196 $ 20,266,196 $ 20,504,060 $ 20,504,060 $ 328,030 328,030 1.6% 1.6% BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ 127,027 $ 326,547 236,393 842,785 1,532,752 $ 127,082 $ 467,850 326,718 869,524 1,791,174 $ 126,488 $ 466,277 325,600 866,237 1,784,602 $ 121,302 $ 371,661 277,518 844,654 1,615,135 $ 124,273 $ 464,345 272,294 672,808 1,533,720 $ 2,215 1,932 53,306 193,429 250,882 1.8% 0.4% 16.4% 22.3% 14.1% 827,326 $ 827,326 $ 914,342 $ 41,578 955,920 $ 914,342 $ 49,820 41,578 1,005,740 $ 914,342 $ 41,925 41,569 997,836 $ 952,741 $ 62,467 1,015,208 $ (38,399) 49,820 (20,889) (9,468) -4.2% 100.0% -50.2% -0.9% $ 381,617 $ 448,439 472,817 225,832 1,528,705 $ 461,497 $ 767,997 458,576 436,339 2,124,409 $ 459,979 $ 767,135 456,881 435,114 2,119,109 $ 419,768 $ 563,893 417,712 261,281 1,662,654 $ 487,318 $ 829,593 1,081,392 176,305 2,574,608 $ (27,339) (62,458) (624,511) 258,809 (455,499) -5.9% -8.1% -136.7% 59.5% -21.5% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,614,392 $ 24,564,950 $ 25,741,541 $ 24,541,821 $ 25,627,596 $ 113,945 $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 0.4% Sources and Uses by Category FY 2011 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 20,168,751 20,168,751 FY 2012 ADOPTED $ $ 576,380 $ 274,312 850,692 $ 2,427,904 2,427,904 $ $ 18,879,365 18,879,365 FY 2012 REVISED $ $ 43,564 $ 320,352 363,916 $ 2,945,144 23,629 2,968,773 $ $ 18,879,365 18,879,365 FY 2012 FORECAST $ $ 183,564 $ 320,352 503,916 $ 2,945,144 23,629 2,968,773 $ $ 18,879,365 18,879,365 FY 2013 ADOPTED $ $ 158,564 $ 320,352 478,916 $ 2,919,652 23,629 2,943,281 $ $ 16,721,924 16,721,924 REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ $ - $ 320,352 320,352 $ 3,406,451 $ 23,629 3,430,080 $ (2,157,441) (2,157,441) -11.4% -11.4% (183,564) -100.0% 0.0% (183,564) -36.4% 461,307 461,307 15.7% 0.0% 15.5% $ SUBTOTAL $ 786,652 $ 786,652 $ 723,750 $ 723,750 $ 723,750 $ 723,750 $ 731,024 $ 731,024 $ 716,270 716,270 $ $ (7,480) (7,480) -1.0% -1.0% $ 133,346 $ 402,640 535,986 $ 50,000 $ 170,410 220,410 $ 50,000 $ 207,001 257,001 $ 72,403 $ 418,829 491,232 $ 100,000 188,970 288,970 $ $ 50,000 (18,031) 31,969 100.0% -8.7% 12.4% SUBTOTAL $ ALL REVENUES $ 24,769,985 $ 23,156,214 $ 23,332,805 $ 23,523,818 $ 21,477,596 $ (1,855,209) -8.0% TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,769,985 $ 23,156,214 $ 23,332,805 $ 23,523,818 $ 21,477,596 $ (1,855,209) -8.0% 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 7,160,480 $ 837,939 722 2,501,988 15,573 (12,767) 12,767 10,516,702 $ 7,321,522 $ 965,325 2,941,506 55,175 (12,800) 12,800 11,283,528 $ 7,321,522 $ 965,325 2,941,506 55,175 (12,800) 12,800 11,283,528 $ 7,558,964 $ 452,009 331 2,831,692 27,131 (12,800) 12,800 10,870,127 $ 7,127,653 $ 1,237,726 2,954,391 52,775 (12,800) 12,800 11,372,545 $ 193,869 (272,401) (12,885) 2,400 (89,017) 2.6% -28.2% N/A -0.4% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% -0.8% 5,038,776 $ 17,278 859,576 5,915,630 $ 5,752,159 $ 21,000 997,000 6,770,159 $ 6,833,884 $ 21,000 1,001,866 7,856,750 $ 6,859,365 $ 14,602 1,082,580 7,956,547 $ 7,403,645 $ 21,000 892,423 8,317,068 $ (569,761) 109,443 (460,318) -8.3% 0.0% 10.9% -5.9% 524,960 $ 634,366 466,699 2,199,751 1,134 32,582 32,399 208,994 583,516 4,684,401 $ 1,093,775 $ 689,449 743,453 2,546,827 47,650 84,800 244,913 682,396 6,133,263 $ 1,183,775 $ 689,449 743,453 2,546,827 47,650 84,800 244,913 682,396 6,223,263 $ 1,208,152 $ 650,200 496,085 2,141,672 358 45,536 51,841 260,089 575,758 5,429,691 $ 892,775 $ 723,518 660,770 989,265 1,649,150 87,300 246,315 688,890 5,937,983 $ $ 3,055,019 $ 263,004 119,876 59,760 3,497,659 $ - $ 378,000 378,000 $ - $ 378,000 378,000 $ - $ 284,755 701 285,456 $ - $ - $ 378,000 378,000 N/A 100.0% N/A N/A 100.0% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 24,614,392 $ 24,564,950 $ 25,741,541 $ 24,541,821 $ 25,627,596 $ 113,945 0.4% TOTAL USES $ 24,614,392 $ 24,564,950 $ 25,741,541 $ 24,541,821 $ 25,627,596 $ 113,945 0.4% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 291,000 24.6% (34,069) -4.9% 82,683 11.1% 1,557,562 61.2% N/A (1,601,500) -3361.0% (2,500) -2.9% (1,402) -0.6% (6,494) -1.0% 285,280 4.6% Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2011 ACTUAL FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % (48,620) $ 85,000 36,380 $ - $ 83,564 83,564 $ - $ 223,564 223,564 $ - $ 198,564 198,564 $ - $ - $ N/A (223,564) -100.0% (223,564) -100.0% SOURCES $ 21,948,086 $ (1) 21,948,085 $ 20,423,854 $ 20,423,854 $ 20,423,854 $ 36,591 20,460,445 $ 20,635,515 $ 36,591 20,672,106 $ 18,362,225 $ 1,230,986 19,593,211 $ (2,061,629) -10.1% 1,194,395 3264.2% (867,234) -4.2% $ SOURCES $ 2,186,335 $ 2,186,335 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 4,515,096 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,866,300 1,866,300 70.5% 70.5% $ 42,449 $ 788,318 830,767 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,197 $ (13,845) 4,352 $ - $ 10,564,918 10,564,918 $ 10,564,918 10,564,918 N/A N/A N/A SOURCES $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (1,399,725) $ (11,795,904) (13,195,629) $ (1,399,725) (11,795,904) (13,195,629) N/A N/A N/A DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,128,250 $ 641,735 $ 24,769,985 $ 23,072,650 $ 83,564 $ 23,156,214 $ 23,072,650 $ 260,155 $ 23,332,805 $ 23,302,508 $ 221,310 $ 23,523,818 $ 21,477,596 $ - $ 21,477,596 $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL $ SOURCES $ $ 72 (1,595,054) -6.9% (260,155) -100.0% (1,855,209) -8.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON-RECURRING 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 69,999 $ 69,999 $ 83,564 $ 83,564 $ 223,564 $ 223,564 $ 198,564 $ 198,564 $ - $ - $ $ 17,446,229 $ 327,945 17,774,174 $ 19,401,590 $ 2,431,000 21,832,590 $ 20,401,590 $ 2,467,591 22,869,181 $ 19,273,898 $ 2,420,563 21,694,461 $ 18,362,225 $ 14,714,918 33,077,143 $ 2,039,365 10.0% (12,247,327) -496.3% (10,207,962) -44.6% 2,568,638 $ 2,568,638 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 4,515,096 $ 1,230,986 5,746,082 $ (1,866,300) -70.5% (1,230,986) N/A (3,097,286) -116.9% 4,433,163 $ 4,433,163 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (1,399,725) $ (11,795,904) (13,195,629) $ 1,399,725 11,795,904 13,195,629 N/A N/A N/A 20,014,867 $ 4,599,525 $ 24,614,392 $ 22,050,386 $ 2,514,564 $ 24,564,950 $ 23,050,386 $ 2,691,155 $ 25,741,541 $ 21,922,694 $ 2,619,127 $ 24,541,821 $ 21,477,596 $ 4,150,000 $ 25,627,596 $ 1,572,790 (1,458,845) 113,945 FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING NON-RECURRING FY 2012 ADOPTED $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING $ NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 73 223,564 223,564 100.0% 100.0% 6.8% -54.2% 0.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ - $ - $ - $ 2,630,711 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,195,629 CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 11,795,904 ELIMINATIONS $ - $ - $ - $ (13,195,629) Operating $ - $ - $ - $ (1,399,725) Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ (11,795,904) $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 74 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ - $ - $ - $ 13,195,629 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 11,795,904 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ - $ - $ - $ 11,964,643 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,195,629 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ 1,399,725 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ 11,795,904 ELIMINATIONS $ - $ - $ - $ (13,195,629) Operating $ - $ - $ - $ (1,399,725) Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ (11,795,904) $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER DESKTOP SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 14.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 14.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 2.00 15.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 2.00 15.00 4.00 2.00 7.00 1.00 14.00 (1.00) (1.00) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (50.0%) (6.7%) 142.73 142.73 171.73 141.73 141.73 170.73 144.73 144.73 173.73 143.73 143.73 172.73 141.73 141.73 170.73 (3.00) (3.00) (3.00) (2.1%) (2.1%) (1.7%) 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Market Range Title FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 48.49 49.49 51.49 51.49 49.49 12.00 12.00 11.00 11.00 9.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 25.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 19.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 171.73 170.73 173.73 172.73 170.73 MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Department Facilities Planner Deputy Director Deputy Director - Library Director - Library Executive Assistant Finance Manager Finance Support Supervisor Financial Supervisor - Dept Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Manager Human Resources Specialist Human Resources Supervisor IT Division Manager IT Services Supv Librarian Library Administrator Library Clerk Library Coordinator Library Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Network Engineer - Sr/Ld Office Assistant Office Assistant Specialized PC/LAN Tech Support Systems Admin & Analysis Supv Systems/Network Administrator Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer-Sr/Ld Department Total REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 1.00 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (2.00) (3.9%) (1.00) (8.3%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 1.00 100.0% (1.00) (100.0%) 0.0% (1.00) (100.0%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (3.00) (1.7% ) Staffing by Fund 244 246 FUND LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 140.73 139.73 142.73 141.73 119.73 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 51.00 171.73 170.73 173.73 172.73 170.73 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % (23.00) (16.1%) 20.00 64.5% (3.00) (1.7% ) Staffing Variance Analysis During FY 2012, a number of positions were reviewed and adjusted. This is why there is a variance between FY 2012 Adopted and FY 2012 Revised in the Staffing by Market Range Title Table in lines such as Deputy Director – Library and Deputy Director. 76 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District General Adjustments Library District Fund (244) Personnel: • • • • Increase Regular Benefits by $52,569 for the net impact of changes in retirement contribution rates and a decrease in the cost of County-funded life insurance for each employee. Decrease expenditure budget by $28,614 due to a reduction in the number of payroll hours from 2088 hours in FY 2012 to 2080 hours in FY 2013. The FY 2013 Operating budget includes an increase of $79,166 for salary savings to absorb the increase in retirement contributions. Increase Other Benefits and Internal Services Charges by $20,889 for the impact of the changes in Risk Management charges Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Personnel: • • • Increase Regular Benefits by $17,952 for the net impact of changes in retirement contribution rates and a decrease in the cost of County-funded life insurance for each employee. Decrease expenditure budget by $5,419 due to a reduction in the number of payroll hours from 2088 hours in FY 2012 to 2080 hours in FY 2013. The FY 2013 Operating budget includes an increase of $17,952 for salary savings to absorb the increase in retirement contributions. Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that they found enjoyment, personal development and/or cultural enrichment through library services Percent of customers who report that the program/activity was valuable to them Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner FY 2011 ACTUAL 47.6% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 47.6% 47.6% FY 2013 ADOPTED 47.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.0%) -0.1% 86.7% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% (0.0%) -0.0% 94.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.0% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% (0.0%) -0.0% 85.6% 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% (0.0%) -0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Public Library Services 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: Not mandated. Measure Type Result Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that they found enjoyment, personal development and/or cultural enrichment through library services Percent of customers who report that the program/activity was valuable to them Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner Number of items circulated Number of library cards issued Number of programs/activities offered Number of items to be circulated Expenditure per item circulated FY 2011 ACTUAL 47.6% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 47.6% 47.6% FY 2013 ADOPTED 47.6% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (0.0%) -0.1% 86.7% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% (0.0%) -0.0% 94.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 0.0% 0.0% 85.6% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% (0.0%) -0.0% N/A 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% (0.0%) -0.0% 0.04 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 7,506,169 48,414 3,187 8,500,000 $ 2.76 8,000,000 48,000 2,800 8,000,000 $ 2.60 8,000,000 48,000 2,800 8,000,000 $ 2.53 8,000,000 48,000 2,800 8,000,000 $ 2.57 $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 85,000 $ 198,564 1,382,236 1,187,099 2,186,335 2,648,796 815,207 (231,582) $ 4,237,196 $ 4,034,459 $ 198,564 1,380,709 2,648,796 $ 4,228,069 $ - $ (198,564) 2,427,306 1,240,207 4,515,096 1,866,300 (2,630,711) (2,630,711) $ 4,311,691 $ 277,232 -100.0% 104.5% 70.5% N/A N/A 6.9% 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ $ 100.0% 3.1% -117.6% N/A N/A 1.4% Expenditure 69,999 $ 198,564 13,885,391 17,967,625 2,568,638 2,640,901 4,433,163 (231,582) $ 20,725,609 $ 20,807,090 198,564 17,418,836 2,648,796 $ 20,266,196 - $ 198,564 17,409,578 558,047 5,746,082 (3,105,181) (2,630,711) 2,630,711 $ 20,524,949 $ 282,141 Activity Narrative: The Library District Fund (244) has an increase in revenues due to slight increases in miscellaneous and interest revenues and a one-time transfer in of $1,230,986 from the Library Intergovernmental Fund (246). Additionally, the Library District Fund (244) has a decrease in expenditures due to the reduction of total FTE hours in FY 2013, personnel savings and shifting the cost of the De-Dewey Program’s FTEs to Non Recurring Non Project. The Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) has an increase in revenues due to the City of Surprise paying for 25% of the operating costs of the Northwest Regional Library and transfer of $1,399,725 from the Library District Fund (244) for the District’s portion of the FY 2013 Northwest Regional Library operations. Additionally, the Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) has an increase in expenditure due to increased personnel, supplies and other services and a one-time transfer of $1,230,986 from the Library District Fund (244) for expenses in Non Recurring Non Project. There are no scheduled projects in FY 2013, therefore, the Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) has no revenues or expenditures. 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate in FY 2008. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last nine fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2013. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2012 to FY 2013 due to the decline in property values county-wide. The tax rate will remain flat at $0.0492 per $100 of assessed value. Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Fiscal Year Tax Levy (Thousands) N.A.V.) 2004 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 2005 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 2006 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 2007 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 2008 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 2009 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 2010 57,984,051 0.0353 20,468,370 2011 49,707,952 0.0412 20,479,676 2012 38,760,297 0.0492 19,070,066 2013 34,400,455 0.0492 16,925,024 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due October 1 and March 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Fiscal Year The FY 2013 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $16,925,024, a decrease from the FY 2012 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary 79 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to keep property tax rates flat. FY 2013 PROPERTY TAX LEVY LIBRARY DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2013 Recommended FY 2012 Adopted FY 2011 Adopted $ 34,400,455,716 $ $ 38,760,296,714 $ $ 49,707,952,123 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1cent Levy 676,321,912 $ 35,076,777,628 $ 651,121,529 $ 39,411,418,243 $ 653,895,628 $ 50,361,847,751 $ SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Tax Rates 3,507,678 $ 3,941,142 $ 5,036,185 $ 0.0492 $ 0.0492 $ 0.0412 $ 16,925,024 $ 19,070,066 $ 20,479,676 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 332,750 $ 320,352 $ 269,405 $ 17,257,774 19,390,418 20,749,081 Levy Limit FY 2013 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2013 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 24,011,518 0.0698 FY 2013 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 16,925,024 0.0492 Amount Under Limit: $ 7,086,494 0.0206 29.5% FY 2013 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2013 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 19,298,656 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0561 FY 2013 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 16,925,024 0.0492 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 2,373,631 0.0069 FY 2013 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 111,000 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 6.23 5.46 0.77 80 $ 12.3% 12.3% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2012 vs. FY 2013 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2012: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2013: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ $ 124,500 0.0492 6.13 $ 111,000 0.0492 5.46 $ 1.00 16.3% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2013 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 98.8% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2013. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2013 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 16,925,024 $ 16,721,924 Rate 98.8% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. 81 SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2004 252,593 2005 281,442 2006 270,953 2007 246,032 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011 269,405 2012* 320,352 2013** 332,750 * Forecast ** Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2012 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library TOTAL FY 2013 $ 1,140,289 $ 41,470 31,567 1,731,818 $ 2,945,144 $ 1,140,388 508,045 26,200 1,731,818 3,406,451 Fines and Forfeits Fines and Forfeits $800,000 The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the right illustrates the fines collected from FY 2011 and the anticipated amount for FY 2012 and the budget for FY 2013. $780,000 $760,000 $740,000 $720,000 $700,000 $680,000 FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Budget Miscellaneous Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 Forecast FY 2013 Budget The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the left illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2011 through the FY 2013 budget. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ FY 2012 ADOPTED 33,620 FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 43,620 $ 43,620 $ - $ - (48,620) $ 85,000 36,380 $ 83,564 83,564 $ $ $ 198,564 198,564 $ $ 223,564 223,564 $ - $ 83,564 83,564 $ 223,564 223,564 $ 198,564 198,564 $ - Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ (48,620) $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 43,620 43,620 $ $ 43,620 43,620 $ $ - $ $ - $ 69,999 69,999 - $ $ Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 11,565,828 $ 15,100,406 $ 15,100,406 $ 14,506,287 $ 13,483,932 $ 21,948,086 $ (1) 21,948,085 $ 20,423,854 20,423,854 $ 20,423,854 36,591 20,460,445 $ 20,635,515 36,591 20,672,106 $ 18,362,225 1,230,986 19,593,211 $ $ $ 19,401,590 2,431,000 21,832,590 $ $ 17,446,229 327,945 17,774,174 $ 18,362,225 14,714,918 33,077,143 Structural Balance $ 4,501,857 $ Accounting Adjustments $ (1,233,452) $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 14,506,287 14,506,287 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20,401,590 2,467,591 22,869,181 $ 19,273,898 2,420,563 21,694,461 1,022,264 $ 22,264 $ 1,361,617 $ - - $ - $ - $ - 13,691,670 13,691,670 $ $ 12,691,670 12,691,670 $ $ 13,483,932 13,483,932 $ $ - 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 379,824 $ 379,824 $ 379,824 $ 1,230,986 $ 1,230,986 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 2,186,335 2,186,335 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ $ 4,515,096 4,515,096 $ 2,568,638 2,568,638 $ $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ 4,515,096 1,230,986 5,746,082 (382,303) $ - $ - $ - $ - Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments $ 1,233,465 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 1,230,986 1,230,986 $ $ 379,824 379,824 $ $ 379,824 379,824 $ $ 1,230,986 1,230,986 $ $ - Library District Intergovernmental Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement, which may result in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 FORECAST $ 5,258,473 $ 692,024 $ 692,024 $ $ 42,449 788,318 830,767 $ - $ - $ $ $ 4,433,163 4,433,163 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Committed Assigned Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance FY 2012 REVISED $ $ $ - 42,449 $ $ - $ 1,656,077 1,656,077 $ $ $ $ - - $ $ - $ 692,024 692,024 $ 84 $ $ 1,656,077 18,197 (13,845) 4,352 $ 1,660,429 $ 10,564,918 10,564,918 $ $ - $ - - $ 18,197 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 692,024 692,024 $ 1,660,429 1,660,429 $ 12,225,347 12,225,347 $ $ FY 2013 ADOPTED $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Library District AZLAPR e-Book Grant Library District AZLAPR Orangeboy Grant Library District AZLAPR Teen Book Festival Grant Library District AZLAPR eBook Grant 83,564 $ 140,000 $ 25,000 65,000 25,000 25,000 140,000 25,000 65,000 25,000 25,000 $ 223,564 $ 223,564 $ (140,000) $ (25,000) (65,000) (25,000) (25,000) (140,000) (25,000) (65,000) (25,000) (25,000) $ 83,564 $ 83,564 $ (83,564) $ (83,564) (83,564) (83,564) $ - $ -100.0% -100.0% C-65-12-002-M-00 C-65-12-004-M-00 C-65-12-020-M-00 C-65-12-021-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-12-002-M-00 C-65-12-004-M-00 C-65-12-020-M-00 C-65-12-021-M-00 FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Grant Reconciliation 83,564 $ Agenda Item: FY 2012 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Library District AZLAPR e-Book Grant Library District AZLAPR Orangeboy Grant Library District AZLAPR Teen Book Festival Grant Library District AZLAPR eBook Grant $ Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Supplemental Funding Mid Year Adjustments Library Materials Asst Prog 19,401,590 $ 20,423,854 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 - $ 20,401,590 $ 20,423,854 $ (28,614) $ (28,614) - $ (1,771,577) $ (1,771,577) (1,822,455) (1,822,455) - $ 18,601,399 $ 18,601,399 $ 52,569 $ 52,569 (291,743) $ (212,577) - Agenda Item: C-65-12-005-M-00 FY 2012 Revised Budget Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Adjust Hours Per FTE General Revenues Property Taxes Structural Balance Structural Balance $ Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Agenda Item: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments De-Dewey Program Temporary FTEs to Non Recurring Non Project Personnel Savings Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Interest Revenue Property Taxes Reduction in Property Taxes Reduction in Collection Rate FY 2013 Tentative Budget $ $ (212,577) (79,166) - $ - $ - 45,812 45,812 (284,986) 50,000 (334,986) $ 18,362,225 $ -1.3% 18,362,225 -1.3% $ - $ (20,889) 20,889 - $ 18,362,225 $ -1.3% 18,362,225 -1.3% $ $ $ (311,886) (23,100) Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 86 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) Non Recurring Non Project Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation - $ 36,591 $ 8,866 27,725 36,591 8,866 27,725 $ 2,467,591 $ 36,591 $ (36,591) $ (8,866) (27,725) (2,431,000) $ (2,431,000) (36,591) (8,866) (27,725) - C-65-12-009-M-00 C-65-12-016-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-12-009-M-00 C-65-12-016-M-00 $ FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Polaris for Glendale Library Reciprocal Borrowing Program Material Assistance Program for City Libraries De-Dewey Program (Remaining Libraries) Computer/Equipment Replacement Website Redesign 2,431,000 $ Agenda Item: FY 2012 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of Library Donation Friends of Library Donation Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring $ $ - $ - $ 10,564,918 $ 10,564,918 4,150,000 $ 4,150,000 1,230,986 1,230,986 14,714,918 $ 1,230,986 Agenda Item: $ Revenue: Transfer In from Library Intergovernmental Fund FY 2013 Adopted Budget g g $ 300,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 800,000 300,000 150,000 $ 1,230,986 $ 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ (5,419) $ (5,419) - $ - Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Adjust Hours Per FTE Structural Balance Structural Balance Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec (5,419) (5,419) $ 2,643,377 $ 2,643,377 $ 17,952 $ 17,952 (17,952) $ (17,952) 1,871,719 $ 1,871,719 1,871,719 1,871,719 4,515,096 $ 70.8% 4,515,096 70.8% Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2012 Revised Budget $ - $ - FY 2013 Budget Target $ - $ - $ 1,230,986 $ 1,230,986 - $ 1,230,986 $ - Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Transfer Out to Library District Fund Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget g g 1,230,986 Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ - $ - FY 2012 Revised Budget $ - $ - FY 2013 Budget Target $ - $ - $ - $ - 10,564,918 10,564,918 $ - $ 10,564,918 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2013 Change Adopted Budget Percent from Target Amount 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Approve the Stadium District FY 2013 Budget in the amount of $10,285,335 by total appropriation for each fund and function class for the Stadium District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Stadium District’s FY 2013 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4232 submit a copy of the Stadium District FY 2013 Final Budget to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 89 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s Adopted expenditure budget for FY 2013 is $10,285,335 and the Adopted revenue budget is $10,278,864. Chase Field is now entering its 15th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility, the District began the Concrete Repair and Concourse Sound System projects in FY 2012. The Concourse Sound System project will be completed in FY 2013 and completion of the Concrete Repair project is expected to occur in FY 2014. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue 5,400,000 5,200,000 Revenue $$ 5,000,000 4,800,000 4,600,000 4,400,000 4,200,000 4,000,000 3,800,000 FY 09 Actual FY 10 Actual FY 11 Actual FY 12 Forecast FY 13 Adopted Although Car Rental Surcharge revenue is expected to improve modestly in FY 2013, it will not be sufficient to cover the scheduled debt service payment on the Cactus League bonds. Approximately $500,000 in fund balance will be used to cover the portion of the debt service not covered by FY 2013 revenue. Since there is no excess car rental surcharge revenue, there will be no funding turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in FY 2013. Despite the current insufficiency of the Car Rental Surcharge to fully cover debt obligations, the revenue now appears to be on an upward trend. In response to this recent trend, Fitch’s Bond Rating on the Maricopa County Stadium District has been upgraded from ‘BBB-’ to ‘BBB+’. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, Tom Manos Maricopa County Manager On June 18, 2012, the Stadium District Board of Directors adopted the FY 2013 Stadium District budget totaling $10,285,335. There was no change in total expenditures from the Tentative Adopted Budget. 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Jacqueline M. Edwards, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction By June, 2013, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 10% from 80% to 90% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: As of June 30, 2011, the District reached this goal. This goal will be updated during the FY 2014 Strategic Business Plan update process. Citizen Satisfaction By June, 2013, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 5% from 108 to 113 non-baseball events. Status: As of June 30, 2011, the number of District non-baseball events held at the ballpark was 164. This is a 52% increase over the baseline number of 108. This goal will be updated during the FY 2014 Strategic Business Plan update process. Department Specific By June, 2014, increase the number of major league baseball spring training facilities by 20% from 9 to 11 spring training facilities. Status: As of June 30, 2011, there were 10 spring training facilities. Department anticipates reaching the goal by the target date. Department Specific The By June, 2014, the District will increase facility revenue from $600,000 to $630,000 by 5% for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: As of June 30, 2011, the District received $600,000 for non-baseball events. The Department anticipates reaching the goal by the target date. This goal will be updated during the FY 2014 Strategic Business Plan update process. 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 13,013,820 $ 8,511,299 $ 8,895,414 $ $ $ 4,751,987 300,000 1,200,000 6,251,987 $ $ 3,234,031 13,601 1,164,993 63,216 115,500 4,591,341 $ 4,591,341 $ 6,251,987 $ $ 353,985 $ 1,531 1,392,256 19 2,084,520 3,832,311 $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES $ CAPITAL TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ - $ - $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES SUBTOTAL $ ELIMINATIONS 30,420,533 $ - TOTAL $ 30,420,533 $ 100 $ 936 750,000 884,520 1,635,556 $ 4,752,087 $ - $ 3,234,031 13,601 1,164,993 364,152 750,000 2,200,020 (2,200,020) 12,478,884 $ (2,200,020) $ 4,752,087 3,234,031 13,601 1,164,993 364,152 750,000 10,278,864 $ 1,635,556 $ 12,478,884 $ (2,200,020) $ 10,278,864 - $ 11,250 6,623,294 115,500 6,750,044 $ 3,000 3,000 $ 353,985 $ - $ 1,531 1,406,506 6,623,313 2,200,020 (2,200,020) 10,585,355 $ (2,200,020) $ 353,985 1,531 1,406,506 6,623,313 8,385,335 NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES TOTAL USES $ 3,832,311 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 13,772,850 $ 759,030 $ $ $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000 - $ 1,900,000 $ 6,750,044 $ 1,903,000 (498,057) $ 1,632,556 $ 8,013,242 $ 8,627,970 93 $ $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ 12,485,355 $ (2,200,020) 1,893,529 $ 30,414,062 $ 1,000,000 900,000 1,900,000 $ 10,285,335 - $ 1,893,529 - $ 30,414,062 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2012 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING All Functions STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT $ 99,143 $ FY 2012 REVISED FY 2013 ADOPTED 99,143 $ (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. 99,143 $ - $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,733,168 $ $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,733,168 $ (11,975) (11,975) $ 6,747,468 $ 6,747,468 $ 6,750,044 $ (2,576) $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 1,900,000 3,000 $ 2,003,000 $ 1,903,000 $ 100,000 100,000 $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,200,020) $ $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,200,020) $ 20,299 20,299 $ 8,391,083 $ 10,391,083 $ 10,285,335 $ 105,748 $ 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Uses of Funds $10,285,335 Administrative Services $250,004 2% Stadium Operations $4,502,287 44% Cactus League Support $5,533,044 54% 95 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2011 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ 5,437,811 $ 5,284,198 10,722,009 $ 3,421,745 $ 6,350,024 9,771,769 $ 3,421,745 $ 6,350,024 9,771,769 $ 4,797,955 $ 5,166,258 9,964,213 $ 5,051,987 $ 5,163,561 10,215,548 $ 1,630,242 (1,186,463) 443,779 47.6% -18.7% 4.5% $ $ 92,950 $ 92,950 $ 99,850 $ 99,850 $ 99,850 $ 99,850 $ 48,996 $ 48,996 $ 63,316 $ 63,316 $ (36,534) (36,534) -36.6% -36.6% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,814,959 $ 9,871,619 $ 9,871,619 $ 10,013,209 $ 10,278,864 $ 407,245 $ 5,555,292 $ 5,072,196 10,627,488 $ 5,529,626 $ 2,623,755 8,153,381 $ 5,529,626 $ 4,622,923 10,152,549 $ 5,456,812 $ 4,416,517 9,873,329 $ 5,533,044 $ 4,502,382 10,035,426 $ (3,418) 120,541 117,123 -0.1% 2.6% 1.2% 13,139 $ 29,972 50,330 142,695 236,136 $ 15,410 $ 40,079 53,190 102,087 210,766 $ 15,336 $ 39,878 52,954 101,565 209,733 $ 20,460 $ 36,660 42,901 109,712 209,733 $ 19,343 $ 37,113 52,314 103,726 212,496 $ (4,007) 2,765 640 (2,161) (2,763) -26.1% 6.9% 1.2% -2.1% -1.3% $ 40,967 $ 1,176 42,143 $ 26,190 $ 746 26,936 $ 26,190 $ 1,865 746 28,801 $ 26,190 $ 743 26,933 $ 36,762 $ 651 37,413 $ (10,572) 1,865 95 (8,612) -40.4% 100.0% 12.7% -29.9% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,905,767 $ 8,391,083 $ 10,391,083 $ 10,109,995 $ 10,285,335 $ 4.1% USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 96 105,748 1.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2011 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % FY 2013 ADOPTED SUBTOTAL $ 4,989,933 4,989,933 $ 4,321,845 4,321,845 $ 4,321,845 4,321,845 $ 4,491,363 4,491,363 $ 4,752,087 4,752,087 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,175,626 3,175,626 $ $ 3,200,901 3,200,901 $ $ 3,200,901 3,200,901 $ $ 3,239,936 3,239,936 $ $ 3,234,031 3,234,031 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ 1,071,277 1,071,277 $ 1,198,123 1,198,123 $ 1,198,123 1,198,123 $ 1,148,579 1,148,579 $ $ 13,601 1,164,993 1,178,594 356,557 $ 776,774 1,133,331 $ 364,152 750,000 1,114,152 LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ 426,811 $ 1,027,942 1,454,753 $ $ $ 400,750 $ 750,000 1,150,750 $ 400,750 $ 750,000 1,150,750 $ 430,242 430,242 10.0% 10.0% $ $ 33,130 33,130 1.0% 1.0% $ 13,601 (33,130) (19,529) N/A -2.8% -1.6% (36,598) (36,598) -9.1% 0.0% -3.2% 407,245 4.1% $ $ - N/A N/A $ $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 10,691,589 $ 9,871,619 $ 9,871,619 $ 10,013,209 $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 123,370 123,370 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 10,814,959 $ 9,871,619 $ 9,871,619 $ 10,013,209 $ 10,278,864 $ 407,245 4.1% TOTAL SOURCES $ PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 10,278,864 $ - 234,887 $ 2,769 78,410 307 (49,654) 79,059 345,778 $ 256,973 $ 9,085 84,296 (41,087) 24,886 334,153 $ 256,973 $ 9,085 84,296 (41,087) 24,886 334,153 $ 261,823 $ 3,759 1,137 82,543 (41,248) 26,810 334,824 $ 267,424 $ 9,048 3,000 89,904 (41,136) 25,745 353,985 $ (10,451) 37 (3,000) (5,608) 49 (859) (19,832) -4.1% 0.4% N/A -6.7% N/A 0.1% -3.5% -5.9% SUBTOTAL $ 1,665 $ 824 2,489 $ 3,430 $ 6,500 9,930 $ 3,430 $ 6,500 9,930 $ 1,451 $ 6,500 2 7,953 $ 1,475 $ 56 1,531 $ 1,955 6,500 (56) 8,399 57.0% 100.0% N/A 84.6% SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 60,861 $ 232,535 1,970,192 415,402 816 4,736 2,316 30 55 443 2,687,386 $ 75,298 $ 776,414 1,421 545,929 1,600 3,850 5,550 400 875 11,225 1,422,562 $ 75,298 $ 776,414 1,001,421 545,929 1,600 3,850 5,550 400 875 11,225 2,422,562 $ 41,544 $ 562,879 1,000,100 531,348 658 3,099 2,218 65 263 675 2,142,849 $ 75,298 $ 801,599 1,001,000 512,402 851 4,950 8,400 276 780 950 2,406,506 $ (25,185) 421 33,527 749 (1,100) (2,850) 124 95 10,275 16,056 0.0% -3.2% 0.0% 6.1% 46.8% -28.6% -51.4% 31.0% 10.9% 91.5% 0.7% SUBTOTAL $ 1,145,073 $ 6,601,655 16 7,746,744 $ - $ 6,624,438 6,624,438 $ 1,000,000 $ 6,624,438 7,624,438 $ 1,000,000 $ 6,624,369 7,624,369 $ 900,000 $ 6,623,294 19 7,523,313 $ 100,000 1,144 (19) 101,125 10.0% 0.0% N/A 1.3% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 10,782,397 $ 8,391,083 $ 10,391,083 $ 10,109,995 $ 10,285,335 $ 105,748 1.0% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ 123,370 $ 123,370 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 10,905,767 $ 8,391,083 $ 10,391,083 $ 10,109,995 $ 10,285,335 $ 105,748 1.0% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN $ $ 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ SOURCES $ 144,072 $ 144,072 $ 140,250 $ 140,250 $ 140,250 $ 140,250 $ 130,344 $ 130,344 $ 135,500 $ 135,500 $ (4,750) (4,750) -3.4% -3.4% $ SOURCES $ 4,309,575 $ 2,970,567 7,280,142 $ 4,474,024 $ 4,474,024 $ 4,474,024 $ 4,474,024 $ 4,422,083 $ 4,422,083 $ 4,455,841 $ 4,455,841 $ (18,183) (18,183) -0.4% N/A -0.4% $ SOURCES $ 6,501,621 $ 6,501,621 $ 5,821,745 $ 5,821,745 $ 5,821,745 $ 5,821,745 $ 5,998,162 $ 5,998,162 $ 6,251,987 $ 6,251,987 $ 430,242 430,242 7.4% 7.4% $ 2,115,503 $ 2,477 2,117,980 $ 1,615,321 $ 1,615,321 $ 1,615,321 $ 1,615,321 $ 1,747,967 $ 1,747,967 $ 1,635,556 $ 1,635,556 $ 20,235 20,235 1.3% N/A 1.3% (2,267,759) $ (2,961,097) (5,228,856) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,200,020) $ (20,299) (20,299) 0.9% N/A 0.9% 9,871,619 $ - $ 9,871,619 $ 9,871,619 $ - $ 9,871,619 $ 10,013,209 $ - $ 10,013,209 $ 10,278,864 $ - $ 10,278,864 $ 407,245 407,245 4.1% N/A 4.1% - 0.0% 0.0% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,803,012 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ 11,947 $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 10,814,959 $ 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING $ 20,992 $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 20,992 $ 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING $ 3,461,512 $ NON-RECURRING 2,967,468 FUND TOTAL USES $ 6,428,980 $ 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING $ 6,714,684 $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 6,714,684 $ 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING $ 2,500 $ NON-RECURRING 2,967,467 FUND TOTAL USES $ 2,969,967 $ 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING $ (2,267,759) $ NON-RECURRING (2,961,097) FUND TOTAL USES $ (5,228,856) $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 7,931,929 $ 2,973,838 $ 10,905,767 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 31,258 $ 31,258 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,618,545 $ 3,618,545 $ 3,733,168 $ 3,733,168 $ (11,975) (11,975) -0.3% N/A -0.3% 6,747,468 $ 6,747,468 $ 6,747,468 $ 6,747,468 $ 6,742,539 $ 6,742,539 $ 6,750,044 $ 6,750,044 $ (2,576) (2,576) 0.0% 0.0% 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 2,003,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,000,000 2,003,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,900,000 1,903,000 $ 100,000 100,000 0.0% 5.0% 5.0% (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) $ (2,200,020) $ 20,299 20,299 -0.9% N/A -0.9% 8,391,083 $ - $ 8,391,083 $ 8,391,083 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,391,083 $ 8,109,995 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,109,995 $ 8,385,335 $ 1,900,000 $ 10,285,335 $ 5,748 100,000 105,748 0.1% 5.0% 1.0% 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 DEBT SERVICE Operating 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Operating $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 864,221 $ 864,221 $ 969,847 $ 884,520 Operating $ 864,221 $ 864,221 $ 969,847 $ 884,520 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 864,221 $ 864,221 $ 969,847 $ 884,520 Operating $ 864,221 $ 864,221 $ 969,847 $ 884,520 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,285,347 $ 2,200,020 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,285,347 $ 2,200,020 $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) Operating $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating ELIMINATIONS 99 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,169,847 $ 2,084,520 Operating $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,169,847 $ 2,084,520 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,169,847 $ 2,084,520 Operating $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,169,847 $ 2,084,520 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,285,347 $ 2,200,020 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,285,347 $ 2,200,020 $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) Operating $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,285,347) $ (2,200,020) ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ DEBT SERVICE TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating ELIMINATIONS - Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED ADOPTED FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REVISED TO REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .25 .30 .30 .40 1.25 .20 .95 .65 .70 2.50 .20 .95 .65 .70 2.50 .20 .95 .65 .70 2.50 .25 1.10 .60 .60 2.55 .05 .15 (.05) (.10) .05 25.0% 15.8% (7.7%) (14.3%) 2.0% 3.75 3.75 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00 2.45 2.45 5.00 (.05) (.05) - (2.0%) (2.0%) 0.0% 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Facil Capital Project Mgr Finance/Business Analyst Office Assistant Project Manager Department Total FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REVISED TO REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% Staffing by Fund FUND 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REVISED TO ADOPTED ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.0% General Adjustments Target Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Decrease expenditure budget by $1,304 due to a reduction in the number of payroll hours from 2088 hours in FY 2012 to 2080 hours in FY 2013. Base Adjustments: Cactus League Operations Fund (250) • Decrease Interest Earnings by $4,750 due to lower interest rates. Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Decrease Interest Earnings by $31,784 due to lower interest rates. • Increase Regular Benefits by $2,690 for the net impact of changes in retirement contribution rates and a decrease in the cost of County-funded life insurance for each employee. • Net decrease of $1,522 to right-size Personnel, Supplies, Services, and Capital based on FY 2011 Actuals and FY 2012 Forecast. Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year FY 2011 ACTUAL 91.0% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 25.1% FY 2013 ADOPTED 92.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (8.0%) -8.0% 70.8% 70.8% 66.7% 80.3% 9.4% 13.3% 4.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% (1.0%) -20.0% 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 REV VS ADOPTED Description ACTUAL REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VAR % Percent change in economic benefit from 104.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% (1.0%) -20.0% Cactus League over prior year Number of existing spring training facilities in 10 10 10 10 0.0% Maricopa County for the current Fiscal Year Number of existing and planned spring training 10 10 10 10 0.0% facilities for the current Fiscal Year Cost per existing spring training facility in $ 555,529.20 $ 552,962.60 $ 545,681.20 $ 553,304.40 $ (341.80) -0.1% Maricopa County for the current fiscal year Revenue 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 115,500 5,322,311 $ 5,437,811 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 4,621,745 4,797,955 5,051,987 430,242 (1,315,500) (115,500) (115,500) 1,200,000 $ 3,421,745 $ 4,797,955 $ 5,051,987 $ 1,630,242 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ 0.0% 9.3% -91.2% 47.6% Expenditure 19,849 5,535,443 $ 5,555,292 97,658 $ 29,773 $ 98,500 $ 5,547,468 5,542,539 5,550,044 (115,500) (115,500) (115,500) $ 5,529,626 $ 5,456,812 $ 5,533,044 $ (842) (2,576) (3,418) -0.9% -0.0% 0.0% -0.1% Base Adjustments: Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) • Increase expenditures by $2,576 for the net of the increase in principal payment and the decrease in the interest payment on the 2002 Revenue Refunding Bonds. • Increase revenue by $430,242 for the increase in the collection of the Car Rental Surcharge. Activity Narrative: FY 2013 revenue collected for the Car Rental Surcharge is expected to increase 9.3% from FY 2012 Revised budget amount. This estimated increase is based on the FY 2011 Actual revenue received as well as the revenues received in the first six months of FY 2012. However, the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) will continue to remain out of structural balance in FY 2013 by $498,057. The beginning fund balance in FY 2013 is sufficient to cover required payments. Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Stadium District FY 2011 ACTUAL 91.0% FY 2012 FY 2012 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 25.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % (8.0%) -8.0% Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year. Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 7,217,678 $ 4,399,024 $ 4,388,515 $ 4,412,625 $ 13,601 1,179,241 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,116,135 1,615,221 1,747,590 1,635,456 20,235 (5,228,856) (864,221) (2,169,847) (2,084,520) (1,220,299) $ 5,284,198 $ 6,350,024 $ 5,166,258 $ 5,163,561 $ (1,186,463) 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 6,151,844 $ 3,484,144 $ 3,383,364 $ 3,483,902 $ 1,179,241 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,969,967 2,003,000 2,003,000 1,903,000 (5,228,856) (2,064,221) (2,169,847) (2,084,520) $ 5,072,196 $ 4,622,923 $ 4,416,517 $ 4,502,382 $ 70.8% 70.8% FY 2013 ADOPTED 92.0% 66.7% 80.3% 9.4% 78 16 1,867 1,867 2,261,944 2,264,472 2,228,603 2,210,704 (53,768) -2.4% 2,254,389 2,264,472 2,202,432 2,210,704 (53,768) -2.4% 2.24 $ 2.04 $ 1.98 $ 2.04 1,851 13.3% $ 0.00 11568.8% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 1.3% 141.2% -18.7% Expenditure 242 100,000 20,299 120,541 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% -1.0% 2.6% Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Increase Intergovernmental Revenue by $13,601 for a portion of the Stadium District Facilities Capital Project Manager salary and benefits charged to Maricopa County for work on County capital projects. • Increase Transfer Out by $20,299 based on the existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels (see Fund Transfer section for additional detail). • Increase Other Services by $24,352 for an Economic Impact Study to be completed in FY 2013 and also for facility assessment consultants. • Decrease Intergovernmental Payments by $32,540 as a net result of an increase to Central Service Cost Allocation intergovernmental payment and a decrease to the intergovernmental payment to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for protective services at Chase Field. Long Term Project Reserve (450) Operating • Increase revenue by $20,299 based on the existing agreement with the baseball team and the projected revenue levels (see Fund Transfer section for additional detail). • Decrease of interest revenue by $64 due to lower interest rates. Long Term Project Reserve (450) Non Recurring/Non Project • Increase expenditures by 900,000 for Phase Two of the Stadium District Concourse Sound System. • Increase expenditures by 1,000,000 for Phase Two of the Concrete Repair project. Eliminations Fund (900) • Decrease revenue by $20,299 to eliminate the funds to be transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) from Ballpark Operations Fund (253). • Decrease expenditures by $20,299 to eliminate the funds to be transferred from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). 103 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Activity Narrative: The number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year is expected to decrease by 2.4% in FY 2013. The reduction is actually a normalization of attendance, as attendance in FY 2012 was inflated due to the Major League Baseball All Star Game. Thus, the overall FY 2013 expenditures are budgeted to decrease by 2.9% in comparison to the FY 2012 Revised budget. In FY 2013, the Stadium District will begin tracking all routine maintenance items rather than just those items deemed critical to facility operation. As such, the reported increase in routine maintenance items from 16 in FY 2012 to 1,876 in FY 2013 is not necessarily an indication of an increase in workload. Long Term Project Reserve (450) non-recurring expenditures are budgeted to increase in FY 2013. This is due to the fact that $1,900,000 will be spent on Phase Two (of Two) of the Stadium District Concourse Sound System and Phase Two (of Three) Concrete Repair projects. In FY 2012, Phase One of these projects was approved by the Board of Supervisors through agenda item C-68-12-008-500. In FY 2014, Phase Three (of Three) of the Concrete Repair project will be completed for an additional $1,000,000. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Tourism and Sport Authority (AZTSA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at Stadium District Car Rental a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Surcharge Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum Fiscal Annual Growth amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Year Collections Rate Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service 2003-04 $ 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12* 2012-13** 5,556,717 6,024,416 6,498,814 6,288,093 6,132,465 5,304,567 4,668,575 4,989,933 4,423,031 4,752,087 The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for * Forecasted security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium ** Budgeted District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. 104 14.2% 8.4% 7.9% -3.2% -2.5% -13.5% -12.0% 6.9% -11.4% 7.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources solely comprise Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds are utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from the Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) will be made for repayments of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the revenue expected in FY 2013 results in no net revenue being paid to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2013. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 3,448,496 $ 3,526,043 $ 3,526,043 $ 3,571,574 $ 3,670,660 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 144,072 144,072 $ $ 140,250 140,250 $ $ 140,250 140,250 $ $ 130,344 130,344 $ $ 135,500 135,500 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 20,992 20,992 $ $ 99,143 99,143 $ $ 99,143 99,143 $ $ 31,258 31,258 $ $ 99,143 99,143 Structural Balance $ 123,080 $ 41,107 $ 41,107 $ 99,086 $ 36,357 Accounting Adjustments $ (2) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 3,567,150 3,567,150 $ $ 3,567,150 3,567,150 $ $ 3,670,660 3,670,660 $ $ 3,707,017 3,707,017 3,571,574 3,571,574 $ $ 105 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 7,688,449 $ 8,349,968 $ 8,349,968 $ 8,539,622 $ 9,343,160 $ 4,309,575 2,970,567 7,280,142 $ 4,474,024 4,474,024 $ 4,474,024 4,474,024 $ 4,422,083 4,422,083 $ 4,455,841 4,455,841 $ $ $ 3,461,512 2,967,468 6,428,980 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ 3,721,193 3,721,193 848,063 $ $ 11 $ $ 8,539,622 8,539,622 $ $ $ 3,721,193 3,721,193 752,831 $ $ - $ $ 9,102,799 9,102,799 $ $ $ $ 3,618,545 3,618,545 $ $ 3,733,168 3,733,168 752,831 $ 803,538 $ 722,673 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 9,102,799 9,102,799 $ $ 9,343,160 9,343,160 $ $ 10,065,833 10,065,833 Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 9,468,739 $ 8,770,121 $ 8,770,121 $ 9,255,676 $ 8,511,299 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 6,501,621 6,501,621 $ $ 5,821,745 5,821,745 $ $ 5,821,745 5,821,745 $ $ 5,998,162 5,998,162 $ $ 6,251,987 6,251,987 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 6,714,684 6,714,684 $ $ 6,747,468 6,747,468 $ $ 6,747,468 6,747,468 $ $ 6,742,539 6,742,539 $ $ 6,750,044 6,750,044 Structural Balance $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ (213,063) $ 9,255,676 9,255,676 $ $ (925,723) $ 7,844,398 7,844,398 106 $ $ (925,723) $ 7,844,398 7,844,398 $ $ (744,377) 8,511,299 8,511,299 $ $ $ (498,057) 8,013,242 8,013,242 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2011 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2012 ADOPTED FY 2012 REVISED FY 2012 FORECAST FY 2013 ADOPTED $ 10,002,435 $ 9,108,997 $ 9,108,997 $ 9,150,447 $ 8,895,414 $ 2,115,503 2,477 2,117,980 $ 1,615,321 1,615,321 $ 1,615,321 1,615,321 $ 1,747,967 1,747,967 $ 1,635,556 1,635,556 $ $ $ 2,500 2,967,467 2,969,967 Structural Balance $ 2,113,003 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ $ 3,000 3,000 $ (1) $ 9,150,447 9,150,447 $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,000 2,000,000 2,003,000 1,612,321 $ - 10,721,318 10,721,318 $ $ $ $ 3,000 2,000,000 2,003,000 $ $ 3,000 1,900,000 1,903,000 1,612,321 $ 1,744,967 $ 1,632,556 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 8,721,318 8,721,318 $ $ 8,895,414 8,895,414 $ $ 8,627,970 8,627,970 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 99,143 $ 140,250 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 99,143 $ 140,250 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 99,143 $ 140,250 $ - $ - (4,750) (4,750) $ 99,143 $ 0.0% 135,500 -3.4% Adjustments: General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 3,721,193 $ 4,474,024 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 3,721,193 $ 4,474,024 Adjustments: Employee Salary Adjustments Adjust Hours Per FTE Agenda Item: (1,304) FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Agenda Item: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Increase Intergovernmental Revenue for work on County capital projects Increase Other Services Decrease Intergovernmental Payments Net Decrease of Personnel, Supplies, Services, & Capital Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res General Revenues Interest Revenue FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 3,719,889 $ 4,474,024 $ 2,690 $ 2,690 $ 10,589 $ (9,710) 13,601 13,601 20,299 - $ - (31,784) (31,784) 3,733,168 $ 0.4% 4,455,841 -0.4% $ $ - 13,601 24,352 (32,540) (1,522) $ $ Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 6,747,468 $ 5,821,745 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 6,747,468 $ 5,821,745 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 6,747,468 $ 5,821,745 $ 2,576 $ 2,576 - $ - 430,242 430,242 6,750,044 $ 0.0% 6,251,987 7.4% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Debt Service General Revenues Car Rental Surcharge Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,615,321 FY 2012 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 1,615,321 FY 2013 Budget Target $ 3,000 $ 1,615,321 $ - $ - $ - 20,299 20,299 (64) (64) 3,000 $ 0.0% 1,635,556 1.3% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2012 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Stadium District Concrete and Sound System - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ (2,000,000) $ (2,000,000) - $ - $ - $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 - $ 1,900,000 $ - C-68-12-008-5-00 Agenda Item: FY 2013 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Stadium District Concourse Sound System Stadium District Concrete Repair - $ Agenda Item: FY 2012 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring $ Agenda Item: $ FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 900,000 1,000,000 Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) FY 2012 Revised Budget $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) FY 2013 Budget Target $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (20,299) $ (20,299) (20,299) (20,299) $ (2,200,020) $ 0.9% (2,200,020) 0.9% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2013 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 109 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2011 Year Ending June 30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities $ 47,230,000 $ 44,270,000 978,394 10,864,916 $ 48,208,394 $ 55,134,916 $ 41,165,000 $ 37,905,000 $ 34,515,000 10,465,338 9,286,098 8,106,857 $ 51,630,338 $ 47,191,098 $ 42,621,857 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. 110 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2011 Year Ending June 30 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017–19 Total Principal $ $ 3,570,000 3,760,000 3,960,000 4,170,000 4,395,000 14,660,000 34,515,000 Interest $ $ 1,850,718 1,663,294 1,461,194 1,248,344 1,024,206 1,603,363 8,851,120 Total Debt Service $ $ 5,420,718 5,423,294 5,421,194 5,418,344 5,419,206 16,263,363 43,366,120 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds $6,000,000 Interest $4,000,000 Principal $2,000,000 $- 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: BOND RATINGS Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings RATING AGENCIES Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Premium quality High quality Medium quality AAA AA A Aaa Aa A AAA AA A Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade BBB BB B Baa Ba B BBB BB B Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest CCC CC C Caa Ca C CCC CC C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DD D 112 DDD DD D Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Moody's Standard & Poor's BBB+ (1) WR (2) AAA (3) (1) Bonds are insured, underlying rating. (2) Withdrawn (3) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating Stadium District Loans Payable On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over nine years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2017. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2011 Year Ending June 30 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017-21 Total $ $ 113 Principal 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,106,857 8,106,857 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Stadium District 114 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2013 Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2013 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 115 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts ESTIMATED 2012-13 LESS 2012-13 2011-12 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT LEVY PURPOSE BUDGET 2011-12 REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT Bond Interest $ DIST. NO. K-91 DISTRICT NAME Queen Creek Water Improv Bond redemption $ K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest $ Bond redemption 540 $ 450 $ 1,844 - 1,844 2,384 $ 2,384 $ 2,294 $ - $ 2,294 1,037 $ 1,037 $ 1,897 1,897 6,006 - 6,006 2,934 $ 2,934 $ 6,727 $ - $ 6,727 6,072 $ 4,905 $ - $ 4,905 6,072 $ 14,597 7,000 $ 721 $ - 20,669 $ - $ 100,000 100,000 100,000 28793 Queen Creek Water Improv General 10,900 10,900 7,787 7,787 Total $ 151,674 $ 116 125,687 $ 151,674 $ 721 - 13,800 $ General General $ - $ 28795 Circle City Community Park Subtotal $ 125,687 7,000 $ - $ 4,905 $ 28529 Estrella Dells General 450 1,844 $ 20,669 $ 28835 20th Street - $ 1,844 14,597 $ 540 $ 4,905 13,800 - 100,000 10,900 - 10,900 7,315 - 132,015 $ 145,940 $ - 7,315 $ 132,015 - $ 145,940 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts MARICOPA COUNTY STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B 3,571 3,895 11,342 1,395 8,345 12,492 1,036 23,382 3,212 5,580 7,497 7,336 279 1,269 4,916 6,802 2,790 11,782 4,521 5,473 7,605 3,843 5,658 837 797 9,773 2,154 14,660 1,098 7,402 1,098 10,031 8,230 12,536 17,928 1,800 2,471 14,743 4,185 Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET 3,583 3,902 11,542 1,414 8,800 12,705 1,062 23,434 3,270 5,658 7,637 7,344 283 1,288 4,994 6,920 2,829 11,953 4,593 5,482 7,644 3,897 5,743 849 814 9,921 2,228 14,880 1,113 7,536 1,113 10,182 8,354 12,741 18,281 1,828 2,505 14,767 4,244 117 Estimated TAX LEVY 77 3,981 13,843 1,765 725 15,746 1,235 28,584 3,544 5,627 8,034 7,320 346 1,454 6,112 8,707 2,742 13,530 4,883 6,312 8,867 4,885 6,067 908 1,087 10,947 2,632 16,007 1,148 8,069 1,429 10,898 9,190 13,663 19,721 1,891 2,958 15,882 4,225 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 773,790 984,820 1,651,730 212,350 7,247,731 1,662,868 324,660 1,597,837 792,970 3,059,292 868,969 1,675,660 1,699,913 439,560 1,478,320 1,579,750 505,674 2,774,060 1,109,100 821,190 1,169,648 451,105 3,752,330 701,610 221,860 3,707,364 203,666 5,668,977 314,100 2,572,190 131,570 2,908,160 2,419,270 3,546,347 4,216,140 1,345,070 233,339 1,690,110 857,094 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.0100 0.4042 0.8381 0.8312 0.0100 0.9469 0.3804 1.7889 0.4469 0.1839 0.9245 0.4368 0.0204 0.3308 0.4134 0.5512 0.5422 0.4877 0.4403 0.7686 0.7581 1.0829 0.1617 0.1294 0.4899 0.2953 1.2923 0.2824 0.3655 0.3137 1.0861 0.3747 0.3799 0.3853 0.4678 0.1406 1.2677 0.9397 0.4929 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 DESCRIPTION Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 33,860 2,599 4,439 4,862 32,110 1,395 1,634 7,716 5,019 1,025,362 14,403 2,790 3,069 240 3,627 25,350 2,853 6,840 5,216 20,102 13,424 3,347 2,535 4,175 2,196 29,243 3,824 27,324 31,727 3,347 5,580 3,888 3,294 8,256 16,195 13,158 23,427 9,252 6,396 19,916 18,599 12,504 177,996 6,306 15,145 44,382 27,217 Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET 33,902 2,644 4,523 4,942 32,150 1,414 1,663 7,832 5,029 1,027,516 14,620 2,829 3,112 250 3,678 25,379 2,908 7,017 5,289 20,124 13,440 3,395 2,575 4,185 2,227 29,269 3,828 27,726 31,767 3,395 5,658 3,894 3,340 8,374 16,424 13,361 23,464 9,416 6,411 19,943 18,623 12,522 178,461 6,313 15,182 43,977 27,255 118 Estimated TAX LEVY 34,917 2,857 4,800 5,957 33,445 1,732 1,981 8,595 5,205 1,092,724 15,615 3,402 3,704 21 3,603 26,465 3,414 7,787 6,291 21,425 14,601 4,042 2,719 4,743 2,813 31,202 4,004 27,093 33,565 3,957 6,463 3,999 3,367 9,000 17,844 14,375 26,373 11,793 6,871 20,586 19,346 12,213 182,560 6,948 15,888 45,046 28,848 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 4,005,695 551,000 712,180 614,525 3,647,990 224,530 243,350 2,605,410 349,407 210,180,843 3,566,420 266,700 587,380 212,630 927,577 2,644,337 213,080 506,510 452,730 2,380,740 1,644,011 407,720 174,100 658,381 358,190 3,153,522 292,660 3,169,445 3,683,396 724,582 865,659 279,890 487,610 2,670,525 3,291,545 3,131,233 4,122,743 1,058,700 689,950 2,276,620 2,466,551 1,779,430 36,108,419 1,147,250 1,749,845 6,899,231 3,874,681 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.8717 0.5185 0.6740 0.9694 0.9168 0.7714 0.8141 0.3299 1.4897 0.5199 0.4378 1.2756 0.6306 0.0099 0.3884 1.0008 1.6022 1.5374 1.3896 0.8999 0.8881 0.9914 1.5617 0.7204 0.7853 0.9894 1.3681 0.8548 0.9113 0.5461 0.7466 1.4288 0.6905 0.3370 0.5421 0.4591 0.6397 1.1139 0.9959 0.9042 0.7843 0.6863 0.5056 0.6056 0.9080 0.6529 0.7445 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 DESCRIPTION Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B 27,560 2,811 6,341 32,314 780 13,120 1,138 4,118 39,541 5,216 3,568 1,372 1,922 5,043 5,160 8,235 8,695 1,165 5,478 27,079 25,542 8,288 2,196 19,370 5,580 1,395 8,484 2,232 13,996 4,353 4,252 3,752 11,255 2,274 9,357 13,304 1,138 27,010 36,669 14,488 8,504 607 5,858 22,976 12,369 28,166 4,157 Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET 27,598 2,852 6,349 32,352 821 13,141 1,197 4,176 39,580 5,289 3,573 1,392 1,949 5,116 5,174 8,351 8,835 1,185 5,483 27,118 25,569 8,300 2,227 19,737 5,658 1,414 8,632 2,263 14,196 4,420 4,326 3,815 11,279 2,317 9,510 13,501 1,197 26,572 36,699 14,515 8,519 638 5,941 23,002 12,395 28,199 4,162 119 Estimated TAX LEVY 28,753 3,476 6,336 32,426 186 14,126 77 4,227 41,099 5,533 3,649 1,467 2,172 6,084 5,777 8,774 9,331 1,395 5,572 29,030 27,069 9,741 2,269 19,441 6,195 1,292 10,271 2,685 15,539 4,881 5,118 4,303 12,133 2,531 11,619 14,171 71 29,707 38,535 17,370 8,795 29 7,423 24,538 13,247 29,013 4,414 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 3,414,780 410,038 855,719 3,843,596 1,858,270 2,115,101 767,870 359,275 4,547,383 670,682 552,245 244,920 180,460 519,000 657,953 1,634,359 1,649,264 179,150 790,850 3,369,203 3,161,714 3,391,227 301,140 4,799,309 1,399,400 250,680 635,425 248,740 1,869,488 606,535 495,570 382,327 1,321,257 435,132 1,483,210 2,300,239 707,540 3,636,242 4,029,027 3,321,682 1,685,225 287,820 1,018,438 3,423,647 1,225,319 2,951,140 390,705 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.8420 0.8477 0.7404 0.8436 0.0100 0.6679 0.0100 1.1765 0.9038 0.8250 0.6608 0.5990 1.2036 1.1723 0.8780 0.5368 0.5658 0.7787 0.7046 0.8616 0.8561 0.2872 0.7535 0.4051 0.4427 0.5154 1.6164 1.0794 0.8312 0.8047 1.0328 1.1255 0.9183 0.5817 0.7834 0.6161 0.0100 0.8170 0.9564 0.5229 0.5219 0.0101 0.7289 0.7167 1.0811 0.9831 1.1298 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 DESCRIPTION Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 4,764 1,595 684 2,203 4,681 760 1,975 2,321 608 2,507 3,906 4,089 608 2,491 1,443 1,367 3,840 3,569 7,253 4,178 4,378 2,734 1,747 3,494 2,745 6,588 835 8,946 503 760 2,355 988 2,127 2,538 10,103 6,184 4,254 10,322 2,397 1,975 684 456 1,671 7,961 608 1,647 15,623 Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET 4,833 1,678 719 2,317 4,926 799 2,077 2,443 639 2,637 3,961 4,304 639 2,528 1,518 1,438 4,041 3,619 7,356 4,394 4,616 2,876 1,838 3,675 2,784 6,681 879 9,200 532 799 2,477 1,039 2,158 2,576 10,626 6,520 4,474 10,467 2,523 2,077 719 479 1,758 8,073 639 1,670 15,843 120 Estimated TAX LEVY 5,615 176 95 182 437 88 206 212 410 332 4,835 517 73 2,739 185 147 319 3,718 8,666 391 420 339 153 397 3,071 7,459 74 11,632 57 95 195 103 2,572 2,638 1,113 639 910 12,207 278 119 54 45 183 8,570 52 1,793 18,008 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 1,317,076 1,760,623 953,790 1,819,630 4,367,860 877,870 2,057,110 2,118,930 4,103,220 3,320,860 563,290 5,168,244 725,114 289,790 1,851,730 1,472,989 3,193,050 1,180,630 786,912 3,908,002 4,202,890 3,391,283 1,532,800 3,966,260 346,730 769,745 741,050 1,803,922 567,940 951,410 1,949,720 1,033,027 221,158 395,110 11,129,211 6,389,578 9,101,520 2,185,961 2,775,820 1,187,329 539,320 454,360 1,825,040 917,330 517,032 182,660 3,212,030 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.4263 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.8584 0.0100 0.0101 0.9452 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.3149 1.1013 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.8857 0.9690 0.0100 0.6448 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 1.1630 0.6677 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.5584 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0099 0.0100 0.9342 0.0101 0.9816 0.5606 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 DESCRIPTION Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 5,624 2,471 2,745 45,781 20,269 8,784 6,069 3,529 37,542 32,656 16,109 14,619 17,835 14,338 2,745 8,509 58,113 44,397 5,196 5,652 399,453 5,322 7,961 7,154 44,908 3,129 11,242 50,509 11,529 28,543 45,532 9,608 15,451 16,445 40,054 3,652 4,941 7,659 12,515 52,951 28,430 14,442 53,222 23,969 11,438 18,691 8,369 Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET 5,710 2,505 2,784 45,844 20,297 8,908 6,162 3,584 37,590 32,703 16,130 14,636 17,857 14,354 2,784 8,629 58,207 44,473 5,205 5,665 400,100 5,399 8,073 7,170 44,961 3,134 11,260 50,577 11,692 28,581 45,584 9,743 15,470 16,472 40,100 3,714 5,011 7,671 12,531 53,020 28,465 14,456 53,285 24,027 11,599 18,955 8,487 121 Estimated TAX LEVY 5,812 2,613 3,023 49,383 21,938 9,618 6,711 4,244 40,847 36,625 16,889 15,950 18,735 15,079 2,824 9,004 62,612 47,875 5,266 5,868 440,179 5,204 8,744 7,699 46,706 3,268 11,481 52,726 12,047 30,204 47,352 10,316 16,016 19,307 41,789 3,526 5,271 8,169 14,866 55,848 29,597 14,671 55,874 28,495 11,533 20,413 8,253 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 1,003,267 233,015 467,980 4,869,599 2,462,498 1,141,582 891,060 267,890 4,568,221 3,582,313 1,885,428 1,765,137 2,148,947 1,245,175 420,615 1,077,840 6,140,202 4,131,057 613,172 568,765 28,262,410 586,452 1,025,032 893,144 5,129,232 362,670 1,379,770 5,787,038 1,417,570 2,520,702 4,669,404 1,159,630 1,210,345 3,073,847 3,067,806 574,265 480,260 1,088,680 2,494,163 6,410,726 3,510,054 1,780,228 5,639,690 8,410,172 2,850,528 2,701,570 2,519,717 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.5793 1.1214 0.6460 1.0141 0.8909 0.8425 0.7531 1.5842 0.8942 1.0224 0.8958 0.9036 0.8718 1.2110 0.6714 0.8354 1.0197 1.1589 0.8588 1.0317 1.5575 0.8874 0.8530 0.8620 0.9106 0.9011 0.8321 0.9111 0.8498 1.1982 1.0141 0.8896 1.3233 0.6281 1.3622 0.6140 1.0975 0.7504 0.5960 0.8712 0.8432 0.8241 0.9907 0.3388 0.4046 0.7556 0.3275 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2013 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2011-12 BUDGET DIST # 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 DESCRIPTION Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vista Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Coldwater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero 13435 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 23104 Litchfield Vista Views Estimated 2012-13 BUDGET Estimated TAX LEVY 3,627 11,105 26,130 22,326 20,616 1,214 10,586 4,697 21,257 12,119 7,233 3,732 17,930 2,714 9,492 760,681 1,487 7,719 104,486 53,197 1,922 16,161 24,715 4,600 56,322 1,394 4,940 31,036 6,082 34,630 10,129 80,905 17,260 4,198 21,019 4,428 709 3,678 11,119 26,152 22,351 20,634 1,277 10,606 4,705 21,273 12,294 7,238 3,739 17,970 2,719 9,654 762,922 1,542 7,770 104,721 53,518 1,949 16,259 24,852 4,621 56,688 1,403 4,969 31,233 6,121 34,832 10,192 81,556 17,361 4,286 27,838 4,454 713 3,573 11,638 28,089 23,855 21,593 130 10,894 4,892 22,105 13,545 7,628 5,632 23,001 3,264 12,057 958,312 1,876 9,680 109,631 68,565 2,181 20,276 31,101 5,355 72,509 1,664 6,444 40,978 7,731 44,263 13,647 103,653 22,500 5,421 31,335 5,625 921 5,360,496 5,392,750 5,899,683 2,745 2,418 2,784 2,422 122 2,704 2,902 TAX YEAR 2012 NET ASSESSED VALUE 906,959 1,778,665 3,433,905 2,100,770 2,342,060 1,303,702 2,396,911 596,900 2,261,570 1,696,645 1,492,310 1,211,720 2,063,035 1,061,350 1,017,957 107,353,517 406,765 2,029,080 20,130,720 13,378,318 781,809 3,376,435 7,863,990 2,884,850 17,907,291 1,640,803 4,519,684 8,150,046 1,754,230 8,190,303 1,476,772 17,657,410 13,345,091 4,903,320 2,578,123 3,697,676 1,038,344 2012 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 Estimated 2012 TAX RATE 0.3940 0.6543 0.8180 1.1355 0.9220 0.0100 0.4545 0.8196 0.9774 0.7983 0.5112 0.4648 1.1149 0.3075 1.1844 0.8927 0.4612 0.4771 0.5446 0.5125 0.2790 0.6005 0.3955 0.1856 0.4049 0.1014 0.1426 0.5028 0.4407 0.5404 0.9241 0.5870 0.1686 0.1106 1.2154 0.1521 0.0887 0.8632 0.2119