FY 2012 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Adopted Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Mission, Vision Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Estimating Fund Balances Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects 1 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 16 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 20 23 24 24 Library District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision Strategic Goals Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type i 53 55 57 57 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 66 67 68 70 71 71 72 72 72 72 75 Stadium District Motion Transmittal Letter Mission, Vision Strategic Goals Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Source and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax Licenses and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service ii 79 81 83 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 92 92 92 95 95 95 95 95 95 96 98 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Improvement Districts 105 107 108 Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies iii Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Table of Contents iv Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion Approve the Flood Control District FY 2012 Budget in the amount of $97,426,423 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Flood Control District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-3620 certify to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors this Budget as adopted, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Flood Control District’s FY 2012 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Recommended FY 2012 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $97,426,423. Budgeted capital project expenditures are budgeted at $60,000,000 in Fiscal Year 2012, a $548,481 decrease from Fiscal Year 2011. The budget continues to provide for a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Property values continue to decline in Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures Maricopa County. Commercial property FY 2010 through FY 2012 declined more steeply than residential $65,000,000 property between FY 2011 and FY 2012. The $60,000,000 FY 2012 budget has been developed with the $55,000,000 tax levy for the median home owner to $50,000,000 remain flat. This has decreased the Flood $45,000,000 Control District Levy to $62,401,172 in FY 2012. This is a levy decrease of $5,618,420. $40,000,000 While the levy is reduced in FY 2012 the $35,000,000 Flood Control District tax rate will increase $30,000,000 from $0.1489 to $0.1780. The District was FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget directed by the Board of Directors to implement a cap of 2% on its tax levy growth, excluding new construction, in order to protect taxpayers from tax increases due to increases in assessed property values. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals $11,637,000 for cost-sharing with other governmental entities on capital projects. In FY 2012, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $63.9 million, which is $6.7 million (9.5%) less than in Fiscal Year 2011. The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $1.55 million for the Floodprone Property Acquisition Program. In all, the Flood Control District has 70 scheduled projects totaling $420,395,091 in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Angie Flick, Management and Budget Supervisor Mission The mission of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is to provide flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation, and education to the people in Maricopa County so that they can reduce their risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding while enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The vision of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is that the people of Maricopa County and future generations will have the maximum amount of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multiple-use facilities that complement or enhance the beauty of our desert environment. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL ELIMINATIONS TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 50,758,016 $ - $ 34,447,306 $ 85,205,322 $ - $ 85,205,322 SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES 61,777,160 315,400 186,613 1,000,000 607,956 $ 63,887,129 $ - $ 61,777,160 315,400 186,613 1,000,000 607,956 - $ 63,887,129 NON-RECURRING GRANTS OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES 566,100 34,800 600,900 - 61,777,160 315,400 186,613 1,000,000 607,956 - $ 63,887,129 $ 11,637,000 45,000,000 56,637,000 TOTAL SOURCES $ 64,488,029 $ - $ 56,637,000 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 15,735,287 $ 1,896,807 16,981,548 2,246,681 $ 36,860,323 $ - $ - $ NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES TOTAL USES 566,100 45,000,000 45,566,100 - 566,100 11,637,000 34,800 45,000,000 57,237,900 566,100 11,637,000 34,800 12,237,900 $ 121,125,029 $ (45,000,000) $ 76,125,029 - $ 15,735,287 $ 1,896,807 16,981,548 2,246,681 - $ 36,860,323 $ 2,800,000 57,200,000 60,000,000 (45,000,000) (45,000,000) 2,800,000 566,100 57,200,000 45,000,000 105,566,100 - $ 15,735,287 1,896,807 16,981,548 2,246,681 - $ 36,860,323 (45,000,000) (45,000,000) 2,800,000 566,100 57,200,000 60,566,100 $ 82,426,423 $ - $ 60,000,000 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 27,026,806 $ - $ - $ 27,026,806 $ - $ 27,026,806 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED UNASSIGNED $ 32,838,334 $ (18,712) - $ 31,084,306 $ 63,922,640 $ (18,712) - $ 63,922,640 (18,712) 6 $ 142,426,423 $ (45,000,000) $ 97,426,423 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2011 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS APS ES ESCO IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CHANDLER PHOENIX DAM SAFETY PROGRAM CITY OF SCOTTSDALE TOWN OF GUADALUPE TOWN OF QUEEN CREEK SOSSAMAN CHANNEL AGUA FRIA RIVER S PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT ARIZ CANAL DIVERSION CHANNEL PARADISE VLY, SCOTTSDALE,PHX EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY SALT GILA RIVER SALTRIVER UPSTREAM INDIAN BEND WHITE TANKS DAM #4 MCMICKEN DAM BUCKEYE NO 1 BUCKEYE SUN VALLEY ADMP GRANITE REEF WASH SPOOK HILL FRS POWERLINE FRS Harquahala FRS SADDLEBACK FLOOD REMED STRUCT WICKENBURG ADMS WITTMAN ADMP AGUILA ADMP HASSAYAMPA RIVER CAVE BUTTES DAM SKUNK CREEK New River Dam UPPER NEW RIVER SKUNK CREEK NEW RIVER SPOOK HILL ADMP EAST MESA ADMP GLENDALE PEORIA ADMP WHITE TANKS ADMP QUEEN CREEK ADMP GILBERT CHANDLER ADMP HIGLEY ADMP ADOBE DAM ADMP DURANGO ADMP ACDC ADMP SCATTER WASH CHANNEL MARYVALE ADMP METRO ADMP MAINT ROAD PAVING PROJECT SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL CIP PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ FY 2011 REVISED FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 36,603,605 $ 40,000,000 76,603,605 $ $ 800,000 $ $ $ 548,481 $ 5,000 3,550,000 55,000 10,000 5,000 380,000 333,000 45,000 10,000 3,367,000 10,000 520,000 25,000 1,060,000 40,000 3,198,000 330,000 15,000 263,000 210,000 100,000 979,000 15,909,000 8,358,000 905,000 7,400,000 5,745,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 2,623,000 60,548,481 $ 548,481 $ - $ 5,000 305,000 974,000 1,000 25,000 289,000 1,120,000 535,000 306,000 2,232,000 70,000 812,000 634,000 40,000 169,000 2,420,000 40,000 271,000 45,000 80,000 631,000 70,000 321,000 118,000 4,134,000 16,253,000 11,318,000 2,021,000 8,345,000 4,034,000 628,000 1,505,000 2,000,000 249,000 50,000 57,950,000 60,548,481 $ 60,000,000 $ $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ 97,952,086 $ 97,952,086 $ 97,426,423 $ 7 36,603,605 $ 36,860,323 $ 40,000,000 45,000,000 76,603,605 $ 81,860,323 $ 800,000 $ 566,100 $ (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. (256,718) (5,000,000) (5,256,718) 233,900 548,481 5,000 305,000 974,000 1,000 25,000 289,000 1,120,000 535,000 306,000 2,232,000 70,000 812,000 634,000 40,000 169,000 2,420,000 40,000 271,000 45,000 80,000 631,000 70,000 321,000 118,000 4,134,000 16,253,000 11,318,000 2,021,000 8,345,000 4,034,000 628,000 (495,000) 199,000 (57,950,000) 548,481 5,000,000 525,663 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $97,426,423 Fund Balance $21,301,394 22% Intergovernmental & Grants $12,389,713 13% Property Taxes $61,777,160 63% Miscellaneous & Interest $1,642,756 2% Permits, Fees & Fines $315,400 0% Uses of Funds $97,426,423 Information Technology $3,129,333 Administrative Services 3% $7,563,792 8% Floord Hazard Identification $10,073,502 10% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,638,922 3% Flood Hazard Regulation $2,548,410 3% Flood Hazard Remediation $71,472,464 73% 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2010 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ 12,942 $ 201,565 214,507 $ 15,000 $ 210,000 225,000 $ 15,000 $ 210,000 225,000 $ 5,000 $ 179,362 184,362 $ 5,000 $ 275,900 280,900 $ (10,000) 65,900 55,900 -66.7% 31.4% 24.8% $ $ - $ - $ 35,900 $ 35,900 $ 35,900 $ 35,900 $ 11,945 $ 11,945 $ - $ - $ (35,900) (35,900) -100.0% -100.0% FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ 525,616 $ 525,616 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 210,966 $ 210,966 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ (233,900) (233,900) -29.2% -29.2% DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ - $ 52,316,832 10,071 52,326,903 $ - $ 4,908,000 4,908,000 $ - $ 4,908,000 4,908,000 $ 100,000 $ 9,465,969 53,897 9,619,866 $ 4,080,000 $ 7,557,000 11,637,000 $ 211,000 $ 1,892,308 2,103,308 $ 211,000 $ 1,892,308 2,103,308 $ 257,531 $ 1,151,513 1,409,044 $ $ $ 4,080,000 2,649,000 6,729,000 N/A 54.0% N/A 137.1% 4,000 $ 230,964 234,964 $ (207,000) (1,661,344) (1,868,344) -98.1% -87.8% -88.8% ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ 750,029 $ 3,599,943 4,349,972 $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 53,908,943 $ 53,908,943 $ 68,308,897 $ 68,308,897 $ 68,308,897 $ 68,308,897 $ 68,430,693 $ 68,430,693 $ 62,963,773 $ 62,963,773 $ (5,345,124) (5,345,124) -7.8% -7.8% GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 685,282 $ 685,282 $ 790,400 $ 790,400 $ 790,400 $ 790,400 $ 819,939 $ 819,939 $ 442,292 $ 442,292 $ (348,108) (348,108) -44.0% -44.0% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 112,011,223 $ 77,171,505 $ 77,171,505 $ 80,686,815 $ 76,125,029 $ (1,046,476) -1.4% 561,511 $ 1,175,111 1,736,622 $ 715,802 $ 1,851,565 2,567,367 $ 715,802 $ 1,851,565 2,567,367 $ 672,099 $ 1,669,632 2,341,731 $ 704,037 $ 1,844,373 2,548,410 $ 11,765 7,192 18,957 1.6% 0.4% 0.7% 198,485 $ 406,798 1,122,375 660,986 2,388,644 $ 251,452 $ 388,063 1,190,275 774,503 2,604,293 $ 251,452 $ 388,062 1,190,275 774,503 2,604,292 $ 222,205 $ 352,413 1,177,309 658,056 2,409,983 $ 248,750 $ 375,635 1,226,855 787,682 2,638,922 $ 2,702 12,427 (36,580) (13,179) (34,630) 1.1% 3.2% -3.1% -1.7% -1.3% 2,799,288 $ 5,060,949 7,860,237 $ 3,017,844 $ 6,961,221 9,979,065 $ 3,017,844 $ 6,961,221 9,979,065 $ 2,312,949 $ 5,510,234 7,823,183 $ 2,782,981 $ 7,290,521 10,073,502 $ 234,863 (329,300) (94,437) 7.8% -4.7% -0.9% 6,353,206 $ 78,593,968 5,595,668 90,542,842 $ 15,051,492 $ 49,815,210 6,540,501 71,407,203 $ 14,462,493 $ 50,404,210 6,540,500 71,407,203 $ 15,328,792 $ 40,101,973 6,448,347 61,879,112 $ 13,027,615 $ 51,271,943 7,172,906 71,472,464 $ 1,434,878 (867,733) (632,406) (65,261) 9.9% -1.7% -9.7% -0.1% 87,021 $ 901,290 351,602 176,784 1,113,598 335,861 54,028 904,869 3,925,053 $ 135,335 $ 1,643,347 347,612 236,868 1,675,370 350,453 68,500 984,930 5,442,415 $ 135,333 $ 1,643,347 347,613 236,868 1,675,372 350,453 68,500 984,930 5,442,416 $ 105,898 $ 1,628,834 330,936 238,532 1,054,888 356,841 67,360 848,321 4,631,610 $ 142,056 $ 1,168,219 379,715 237,652 2,837,453 313,374 39,048 971,341 6,088,858 $ (6,723) 475,128 (32,102) (784) (1,162,081) 37,079 29,452 13,589 (646,442) -5.0% 28.9% -9.2% -0.3% -69.4% 10.6% 43.0% 1.4% -11.9% 1,306,871 $ (20,000,000) 1,400,615 (17,292,514) $ 1,419,286 $ 1,409,137 2,828,423 $ 1,419,286 $ 1,409,137 2,828,423 $ 1,419,288 $ 1,380,853 2,800,141 $ 1,274,433 $ 200,501 1,474,934 $ 144,853 1,208,636 1,353,489 10.2% N/A 85.8% 47.9% $ 420,522 $ 209,854 524,926 1,591,674 30,832 2,777,808 $ 508,972 $ 373,403 457,058 1,748,081 35,806 3,123,320 $ 508,972 $ 373,403 457,058 1,748,081 35,806 3,123,320 $ 508,956 $ 398,374 474,303 1,649,490 36,302 3,067,425 $ 656,269 $ 388,370 308,872 1,727,138 48,684 3,129,333 $ (147,297) (14,967) 148,186 20,943 (12,878) (6,013) TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 91,938,692 $ 97,952,086 $ 97,952,086 $ 84,953,185 $ 97,426,423 $ 525,663 USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ $ $ $ $ $ DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDGT - BUDGETING FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 9 -28.9% -4.0% 32.4% 1.2% -36.0% -0.2% 0.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2010 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS 72,659,844 72,659,844 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ $ FY 2011 REVISED 67,353,206 67,353,206 $ $ FY 2011 FORECAST 67,353,206 67,353,206 $ $ FY 2012 ADOPTED 67,353,206 67,353,206 $ $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 61,777,160 61,777,160 $ $ (5,576,046) (5,576,046) -8.3% -8.3% $ SUBTOTAL $ 680,722 $ 680,722 $ 633,600 $ 633,600 $ 633,600 $ 633,600 $ 529,489 $ 529,489 $ 315,400 $ 315,400 $ (318,200) (318,200) -50.2% -50.2% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 525,506 $ 11,689,449 143,654 12,358,609 $ 800,000 $ 4,908,000 155,691 5,863,691 $ 800,000 $ 4,908,000 155,691 5,863,691 $ 210,966 $ 9,565,969 157,168 9,934,103 $ 566,100 $ 11,637,000 186,613 12,389,713 $ (233,900) 6,729,000 30,922 6,526,022 -29.2% 137.1% 19.9% 111.3% 1,105,456 $ 4,579,209 5,684,665 $ 800,000 $ 2,521,008 3,321,008 $ 800,000 $ 2,521,008 3,321,008 $ 920,319 1,949,698 2,870,017 $ 1,000,000 $ 642,756 1,642,756 $ 200,000 (1,878,252) (1,678,252) 25.0% -74.5% -50.5% (1,046,476) -1.4% MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 91,383,840 $ 77,171,505 $ 77,171,505 $ 80,686,815 $ 76,125,029 $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 20,627,383 20,627,383 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 112,011,223 FY 2010 ACTUAL $ 77,171,505 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ 77,171,505 FY 2011 REVISED $ 80,686,815 FY 2011 FORECAST $ 76,125,029 FY 2012 ADOPTED TOTAL SOURCES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ - N/A N/A $ (1,046,476) -1.4% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 2,444,105 $ 65 160 661,003 (12) 14,222,571 17,327,892 $ 754,133 $ 221,888 17,147,030 18,123,051 $ 754,133 $ 221,888 17,045,030 18,021,051 $ 1,836,941 $ 234 96 511,531 924 14,979,949 17,329,675 $ 723,506 $ 203,016 17,608,765 18,535,287 $ 30,627 18,872 (563,735) (514,236) 4.1% N/A N/A 8.5% N/A -3.3% -2.9% $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,153,674 $ 1,153,674 $ 1,906,952 $ 1,906,952 $ 1,906,952 $ 1,906,952 $ 1,752,071 $ 1,752,071 $ 1,896,807 $ 1,896,807 $ 10,145 10,145 0.5% 0.5% SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES $ 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 547,627 $ 194,448 12,823,140 13,565,215 $ 800,000 $ 117,745 17,179,836 18,097,581 $ 800,000 $ 117,745 17,179,836 18,097,581 $ 229,677 $ 180,136 117,745 13,667,351 14,194,909 $ 566,100 $ 16,981,548 17,547,648 $ 233,900 117,745 198,288 549,933 29.2% N/A 100.0% 1.2% 3.0% CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 8,473,263 $ 99,978 236,204 30,129,644 325,439 39,264,528 $ 4,518,000 $ 548,481 52,882,000 1,876,021 59,824,502 $ 8,679,000 $ 548,481 48,823,000 1,876,021 59,926,502 $ 5,608,564 $ 11,786 504,482 44,142,593 1,409,105 51,676,530 $ 7,922,000 $ 49,278,000 2,246,681 59,446,681 $ 757,000 548,481 (455,000) (370,660) 479,821 8.7% 100.0% N/A N/A -0.9% -19.8% 0.8% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 71,311,309 $ 97,952,086 $ 97,952,086 $ 84,953,185 $ 97,426,423 $ 525,663 0.5% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ 20,627,383 $ 20,627,383 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 91,938,692 $ 97,952,086 $ 97,952,086 $ 84,953,185 $ 97,426,423 $ 525,663 0.5% SUPPLIES 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN 10 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON-RECURRING FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 525,506 $ 525,506 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 210,966 $ 210,966 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ (233,900) (233,900) -29.2% -29.2% $ 79,167,685 $ 1,200 79,168,885 $ 70,581,286 $ 882,219 71,463,505 $ 70,581,286 $ 882,219 71,463,505 $ 70,438,556 $ 471,324 70,909,880 $ 63,887,129 $ 34,800 63,921,929 $ (6,694,157) (847,419) (7,541,576) -9.5% -96.1% -10.6% 52,316,832 $ 52,316,832 $ 44,908,000 $ 44,908,000 $ 44,908,000 $ 44,908,000 $ 49,565,969 $ 49,565,969 $ 56,637,000 $ 56,637,000 $ 11,729,000 11,729,000 26.1% 26.1% (20,000,000) $ (20,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ (5,000,000) (5,000,000) 12.5% 12.5% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ 79,167,685 $ 70,581,286 $ 70,581,286 $ 70,438,556 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ 32,843,538 $ 6,590,219 $ 6,590,219 $ 10,248,259 $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 112,011,223 $ 77,171,505 $ 77,171,505 $ 80,686,815 $ FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FUND / FUNCTION CLASS ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON-RECURRING $ 547,627 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 229,678 FUND TOTAL USES $ 547,627 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 229,678 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING $ 29,684,620 $ 36,603,605 $ 36,603,605 $ 32,083,313 NON-RECURRING 40,627,383 40,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 FUND TOTAL USES $ 70,312,003 $ 76,603,605 $ 76,603,605 $ 72,083,313 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON-RECURRING $ 41,079,062 $ 60,548,481 $ 60,548,481 $ 52,640,194 FUND TOTAL USES $ 41,079,062 $ 60,548,481 $ 60,548,481 $ 52,640,194 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING $ (20,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) FUND TOTAL USES $ (20,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) 63,887,129 $ 12,237,900 $ 76,125,029 $ FY 2012 ADOPTED 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 29,684,620 $ 62,254,072 $ 91,938,692 $ 36,603,605 $ 61,348,481 $ 97,952,086 $ 11 36,603,605 $ 61,348,481 $ 97,952,086 $ (6,694,157) -9.5% 5,647,681 85.7% (1,046,476) -1.4% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ $ 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 233,900 233,900 $ $ 36,860,323 $ 45,000,000 81,860,323 $ $ $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 548,481 548,481 0.9% 0.9% $ $ (45,000,000) $ (45,000,000) $ 5,000,000 5,000,000 -12.5% -12.5% 32,083,313 $ 52,869,872 $ 84,953,185 $ 36,860,323 $ 60,566,100 $ 97,426,423 $ (256,718) (5,000,000) (5,256,718) (256,718) 782,381 525,663 29.2% 29.2% -0.7% -12.5% -6.9% -0.7% 1.3% 0.5% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfer In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS $ FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 990 - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 NON-RECURRING TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (45,000,000) Operating $ - $ - $ - $ Non-Recurring $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS (45,000,000) - Fund Transfer Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 991 - FLOOD CONTROL $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 NON-RECURRING TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 45,000,000 ELIMINATIONS $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (45,000,000) Operating $ - $ - $ - $ Non-Recurring $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ $ - $ - $ - $ ALL FUNDS 12 (45,000,000) - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN PERMITTING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION COMPLNCE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FY 2012 FORECAST ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .40 2.00 .60 3.00 .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .40 3.00 .60 4.00 .40 3.00 .60 4.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 .65 .05 .70 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 - 0.0% 0.0% .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 .75 .40 1.15 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% .15 .85 1.00 2.00 7.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 8.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 8.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 8.00 .15 .85 1.00 2.00 8.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Administrator Attorney - Senior Counsel Director - Flood Control Dist Engineering Manager Financial Supervisor - Dept Operations Manager Operations/Program Manager Department Total FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 8.00 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED ADOPTED 7.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.0% Staffing by Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 991 FLOOD CONTROL Department Total 13 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2007 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Fiscal 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Year (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy 19,544,069 0.2319 45,042,553 21,174,169 0.2119 45,322,696 24,140,629 0.2119 44,165,629 26,585,248 0.2119 50,550,367 29,605,196 0.2119 62,733,411 32,778,027 0.2047 67,096,622 45,937,945 0.1533 70,422,870 54,751,263 0.1367 74,674,333 54,862,329 0.1367 74,996,804 45,681,391 0.1489 68,019,592 35,056,838 0.1780 62,401,172 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. The schedule above lists the District’s secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last ten fiscal years, plus the assessed values and the tax rates for FY 2012. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate increases from $0.1489 to $0.1780 per $100 net assessed value. 60 $0.2500 50 $0.2000 40 $0.1500 30 $0.1000 20 $0.0500 10 0 $03 04 05 06 07 08 Fiscal Year 14 09 10 11 12 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue has declined and is projected to decrease in FY 2012. FY 2012 PROPERTY TAX LEVY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2012 Adopted FY 2011 Adopted FY 2010 Adopted $ 35,056,838,356 $ $ 45,681,391,282 $ $ 54,862,329,172 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Revenue from 1Value w/SRP cent Levy 104,838,912 $ 35,161,677,268 $ 104,842,101 $ 45,786,233,383 $ 105,522,275 $ 54,967,851,447 $ Tax Rates 3,516,168 $ 4,578,623 $ 5,496,785 $ SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.1780 $ 0.1489 $ 0.1367 $ 62,401,172 $ 68,019,592 $ 74,996,804 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 186,613 $ 156,110 $ 144,249 $ Levy Limit FY 2012 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2012 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 83,996,185 0.2396 FY 2012 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 62,401,172 0.1780 Amount Under Limit: $ 21,595,012 0.0616 25.7% FY 2012 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2012 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 68,501,062 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.1954 FY 2012 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 62,401,172 0.1780 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 6,099,890 0.0174 FY 2012 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 124,500 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 24.33 22.16 2.17 15 $ 8.9% 8.9% 62,587,785 68,175,702 75,141,053 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2011 vs. FY 2012 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2011: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2012: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 148,800 0.1489 22.16 124,500 0.1780 22.16 (0.00) 0.0% The FY 2012 budgeted property tax revenue of $61,777,160 is based on an historical collection rate of 99.0%. The table below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2012. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2012 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 62,401,172 $ 61,777,160 Rate 99% Licenses and Permits The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue generated from licenses and permits is used to offset the cost of issuing the permits. The chart to the right shows the FY 2010 actual, the FY 2011 forecast and the FY 2012 budgeted revenue for this category. In FY 2011, the District projected a decrease from FY 2010 for licenses and permits due to the decrease in construction and development in the County. 16 Licenses and Permits Revenue $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2012 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of FY 2012 increase in the District’s secondary property tax rate. SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2003 136,905 2004 152,557 2005 196,239 2006 191,727 2007 199,736 2008 149,582 2009 133,384 2010 144,249 2011* 156,110 2012** 186,613 * Forecast ** Budget Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by IGA’s with the District. The District’s FY 2012 budget is reflective of receiving $11,637,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. Interest rates declined during FY 2011 leading to a decrease in interest revenue from FY 2011 to FY 2012. $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s Capital Improvement Program. Flood Control District Fund Transfers $50 $45 $40 $ (Millions) $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $- 2010 2011* 2012** * Forecast ** Budgeted Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The schedules in the following section list estimated beginning fund balances, estimated sources and uses for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances at the end of the upcoming fiscal year. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Presentation of fund balances has been adjusted in accordance with Statement 54 of the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). For budgeting purposes, fund balances exclude any amounts defined as “non-spendable,” such as fixed assets. District ending fund balances are usually classified as “restricted,” because all District fund balances are subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions. However, a negative ending balance would be classified as “unassigned.” Estimating Fund Balances The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for the upcoming fiscal year begins with audited actual fund balance information as of the end of the prior fiscal year, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning balances for the upcoming fiscal year are estimated by taking the audited ending balance for the prior fiscal year, adding to the forecasted sources for the current fiscal year, and subtracting the forecasted uses for the current fiscal year. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 43,092,131 $ 46,405,987 $ 46,405,987 $ 51,950,161 $ 50,776,728 $ 79,167,685 1,200 79,168,885 $ 70,581,286 882,219 71,463,505 $ 70,581,286 882,219 71,463,505 $ 70,438,556 471,324 70,909,880 $ 63,887,129 34,800 63,921,929 $ $ 32,083,313 40,000,000 72,083,313 $ $ 36,603,605 40,000,000 76,603,605 $ $ 36,603,605 40,000,000 76,603,605 $ $ 29,684,620 40,627,383 70,312,003 $ 36,860,323 45,000,000 81,860,323 Structural Balance $ 49,483,065 $ 33,977,681 $ 33,977,681 $ 38,355,243 $ 27,026,806 Accounting Adjustments $ 1,148 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 51,950,161 51,950,161 $ $ 41,265,887 41,265,887 $ $ 41,265,887 41,265,887 $ $ 50,776,728 50,776,728 $ $ 32,838,334 32,838,334 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ $ $ $ Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (18,712) Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 525,506 525,506 $ 800,000 800,000 $ 800,000 800,000 $ 210,966 210,966 $ 566,100 566,100 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 547,627 547,627 $ 800,000 800,000 $ 800,000 800,000 $ 229,678 229,678 $ 566,100 566,100 Accounting Adjustments $ 22,121 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Unassigned Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ 19 (18,712) (18,712) $ (18,712) (18,712) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 26,283,758 $ 24,075,924 $ 24,075,924 $ 37,521,531 $ 34,447,306 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 52,316,832 52,316,832 $ 44,908,000 44,908,000 $ 44,908,000 44,908,000 $ 49,565,969 49,565,969 $ 56,637,000 56,637,000 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 41,079,062 41,079,062 $ 60,548,481 60,548,481 $ 60,548,481 60,548,481 $ 52,640,194 52,640,194 $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 Accounting Adjustments $ 3 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 37,521,531 37,521,531 $ $ 8,435,443 8,435,443 $ $ 8,435,443 8,435,443 $ $ 34,447,306 34,447,306 $ $ 31,084,306 31,084,306 Expenditures Revenue Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Operations Fund (991) OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 36,603,605 $ 70,581,286 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 36,603,605 $ 70,581,286 $ (117,742) $ (117,742) - $ 36,485,863 $ 70,581,286 $ (7,314) $ (14,112) 6,798 (137,236) $ (137,236) - $ - (1,149,033) (1,149,033) (5,545,124) 30,922 (5,576,046) $ 36,341,313 $ -0.4% 63,887,129 -9.5% $ 519,010 $ 519,010 - $ 36,860,323 $ 1.0% 63,887,129 -9.5% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges Agenda Item: FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Emp Health Dental Prem Realloc Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2012 Recommended Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Equipment/Vehicle Carryover Baseline ISF Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 20 441,522 77,488 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Operations Fund (991) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 40,000,000 $ 882,219 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 40,000,000 $ 882,219 $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) (882,219) (882,219) $ - $ - $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 - $ - 34,800 34,800 45,000,000 $ 34,800 Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Agenda Item: FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Agenda Item: $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ Flood Control Grants Fund (989) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 800,000 $ 800,000 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ (800,000) $ (800,000) (800,000) (800,000) $ - $ - $ 566,100 $ 566,100 566,100 566,100 $ 566,100 $ 566,100 Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Grant Reconciliation Agenda Item: FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants Grant Reconciliation Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget 21 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue NON-RECURRING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 60,548,481 $ 44,908,000 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 60,548,481 $ 44,908,000 $ (1,006,000) $ (1,006,000) - $ 59,542,481 $ 44,908,000 $ 457,519 $ 457,519 - 11,729,000 6,729,000 5,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 0.8% 56,637,000 26.1% Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Flood CIP Reallocation Dec 10 Agenda Item: C-69-11-030-2-00 FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by State statutes and as directed by the District’s General Policies under District Resolutions 88-08, 88-08A and 2010R008. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Readiness • Hazard Mitigation Need • Federal Cost Share • Municipal Cost Share The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 3 capital project bins are budgeted for FY 2012, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: $ Flood Control District Primary CIP Flood Control District Small Project Assistance Program Flood Control District Floodprone Property Acquisition Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Actuals FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Project 102,239,291 $ 58,267,000 $ 57,950,000 $ 53,000,000 $ 46,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 46,000,000 $ 247,950,000 $ 408,456,291 1,505,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,000,000 11,505,000 155,800 228,000 50,000 50,000 433,800 102,395,091 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 55,000,000 $ 48,000,000 $ 47,000,000 $ 48,000,000 $ 258,000,000 $ 420,395,091 Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Result Measures: FY 2011 Year-To-Date Actual 41% RESULT MEASURE Percent of Capital Dollars Expended FY 2011 Projected Year-End with Capital Projected Improvement 95% 100% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 689 square 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP; projects projected for FY 2011 completion will benefit 30 square miles. Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Primary Capital Improvement Program Managing Department: Flood Control District Project Partners: See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Upper Camelback Wash Improvements Cloud Rd. & Sossaman Rd. Basin and Outlet Vulcan Materials Settlement Acquisition Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements Laveen Area Conveyance Channel 27th Ave. & South Mountain Ave. Basin 43rd Ave. & Baseline Rd. Basin Arizona Canal Diversion Channel Improvements Berneil Channel Modifications Rittenhouse Basin Chandler Heights Basin East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Tres Rios White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation McMicken Dam Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Watson Drainage System Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements Spook Hill FRS / SR-202L Modification PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction Saddleback FRS Modifications Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation Martin Acres Flood Hazard Mitigation Cave Buttes Dam Modifications Cave Buttes Access Rights Acquisition New River Dam Outlet Improvements Oak St. Detention Basin and Storm Drain Ellsworth Rd. & McKellips Rd. Drainage System Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements Rose Garden Lane Channel Pinnacle Peak Rd. Channel (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) 107th Ave. & Union Hills Dr. Drainage Improvements White Tanks FRS No.3 Modifications 26 District Scheduled Completion 1 2 1 4 4 5 5 5 3, 4 2 1 1 1 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 2 2 1 4 4 4 4 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 FY 2012 FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 FY 2015 FY 2015 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2014 FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Improvement White Tanks FRS No.3 Outlet Channel Reems Road Channel and Basin Bullard Wash (Phase II) Loop 303 Drainage Improvements Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) 75th Ave. Storm Drain and DRCC Phase I DRCC (107th Ave. to Agua Fria) DRCC (75th Ave. to 107th Ave.) Van Buren St. Channel (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) Camelback Rd. Storm Drain (59th Ave. to 75th Ave.) Bethany Home Rd. Storm Drain (79th Ave. to 59th Ave.) Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) Old Cross Cut Canal (Arizona Canal to Indian School Rd.) Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback Rd. to Lafayette Blvd.) Lafayette Interceptor Drain & Outlet East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve District Scheduled Completion 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 1, 2 N/A FY 2013 FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2013 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP Outside 5-year CIP FY 2012 Outside 5-year CIP FY 2016 FY 2012 N/A Purpose Statement: The Primary Capital Improvement Program typically funds projects that have been recommended by the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure, reducing flooding hazards to Maricopa County residents through construction of new facilities and improvements to existing flood control facilities. Project Descriptions: 022.01.32 – Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022A) Project Partner: City of Chandler Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tailwater system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. The District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement for design and construction of the project; however, the project has been delayed due to a lack of City funding. The FY 2012 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for FY 2013. 027.10.32 – Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation (027A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of 27 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. Project design is in progress, under the City’s lead, with the District providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2009A006. Construction is anticipated to begin during FY 2012. 043.01.30 – Cloud Road and Sossaman Road Basin and Outlet (043A) Project Partner: Town of Queen Creek The Town of Queen Creek completed the Cloud Road Channel capacity study in March 2003. The study recommended construction of a new basin and outlet in the area of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road to mitigate historical flooding to nearby homes along Cloud Road to the west. The project consists of a basin located at approximately the southeast corner of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road and an outlet along Sossaman Road from the basin site north to Sonoqui Wash. The project would provide 100-year flood protection for over 120 homes in the area as well as protect public infrastructure including roads and utilities. Construction is anticipated to be completed during FY 2012. 109.01.30 – Vulcan Materials Settlement Acquisition (109B) Project Partner: N/A Under the terms of a District settlement agreement with Vulcan Materials, the District will acquire rightsof-way for implementation of Agua Fria River improvements bordering a Vulcan Materials sand and gravel operation south of Bell Road. The District’s costs will be reimbursed entirely by Vulcan Materials. Right-of-way acquisition is in progress. 109.02.30 – Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation (109A) Project Partner: City of Avondale Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Project construction is awaiting City funding. 117.08.31 – Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (117A) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The Laveen Area Conveyance Channel improved the Maricopa Drain into a regional flood control facility capable of containing and conveying a 100-year flood event in the Laveen area from 43rd Avenue to the Salt River – a distance of approximately 5.8 miles. An associated flood detention basin at 28 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 43rd Avenue and Southern Avenue mitigates peak flood flows getting to the conveyance channel. The peak discharge at the outfall of the channel for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be 2,800 cubic feet per second. The channel and basin are grass-lined, and a concrete low-flow channel carries tailwater to the Salt River. This project was constructed by a public-private partnership involving the Flood Control District, City of Phoenix, Maricopa County Department of Transportation and the Salt River Project. The District's project involvement is complete, with the exception of litigation related to project rights-of-way condemnations, and the project is being maintained by the city of Phoenix. 117.09.32 – 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue Basin Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 27th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue. Project design is anticipated to begin in FY 2012. 117.09.33 – 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road Basin Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District’s South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Project Feasibility Study evaluated the watershed generally bounded by 43rd Avenue to the west, Central Avenue to the east, South Mountain Avenue to the south and the Salt River to the north. The study identified and compared alternative solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the watershed and selected a recommended plan. Plan elements included several detention basins and a storm drain system to provide an outfall to the Salt River, including a basin located at 43rd Avenue and Baseline Road. Project design is anticipated to begin in FY 2012. 118.01.30 – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel Storm Drain Improvements (118A) Project Partner: N/A The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the District, constructed the ACDC in the 1980s. The District owns, operates and maintains the channel. Storm drain inlet pipes have begun to exhibit cracking along vertical-walled segments of the ACDC. This cracking, if unaddressed, will allow storm water flows to enter the wall backfill to saturate and further consolidate, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the 20-foot vertical wall. This project will address this deficiency and will involve engineered storm drain improvements to extend the life of the channel wall. Storm drain inlets are being modified in three phases to allow for the exploration of multiple solutions. The project is anticipated to be substantially completed by FY 2012. 120.XX.X1 – Berneil Channel Modifications Project Partner: Town of Paradise Valley The Berneil Channel is operated and maintained by the Town of Paradise Valley and generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District approximately the 66th Street alignment. The channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. The Town submitted a project for modification of the Berneil Channel to the District’s prioritization procedure, and the project was recommended. Ideally, a modification project would increase channel capacity to convey the 100-year event, but funding constraints may limit capacity improvements to address 10-year events. The Town has completed a preliminary project study. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is largely dependent upon the availability of Town and District funding. 121.03.32 – Rittenhouse Basin (121A) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Construction of Rittenhouse Basin flood control features is complete, and the project is operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site in the future. 121.03.33 – Chandler Heights Basin (121B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins – the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins – to mitigate EMF flows. Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in at least five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as funding becomes available.Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will purchase an easement on the completed basin site, fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations in the future. 121.XX.X1 – East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel Project Partner: N/A The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and 30 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications; however, should the issues remain, the District would construct a concrete low flow channel along much of the length of the EMF. 126.01.31 – Tres Rios (126A) Project Partners: City of Phoenix, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila Rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands, open water marshes and riparian corridors, and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2 million in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. The levee design and construction will occur in three phases – from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and along 123rd to Southern Avenue. Construction of the first two phases is complete. Construction of the third phase is on hold pending right-of-way acquisition by the City. 201.01.31 – White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet (201A) Project Partner: N/A The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Due to the slowing of development in the area subsequent to the ADMP, the ADMP-recommended project now lacks a viable project partner for implementation. The District has initiated design of a storm drain outlet that will solely accomplish the District’s dam safety needs. Remaining regional flows may be addressed by a future ADMP update. The project’s construction schedule will depend upon the availability of District funding. 31 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 201.02.31 – White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation (201B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (then Soil Conservation Service). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004, and the District has entered into an IGA with NRCS to accomplish project construction. Construction will be in two to three phases, the first of which is in progress. 202.02.31 – McMicken Dam Project (202B) Project Partner: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately nine miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) that discharges to the Agua Fria River. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has pursued, and continues to pursue, federal funding assistance for this project. Should such funding be non-viable, the District may evaluate the potential of initiating a unilateral project. Project planning will include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. 207.01.31 – Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation (207A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). 32 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Since its construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The District completed a planning-level assessment of potential alternatives, including a modified dam, a channel/levee system and combinations of both providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Design is in progress, and construction will be accomplished in phases. 211.03.31 – Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project (211A) Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. Design is complete, and construction is being accomplished in phases as funding becomes available. 211.XX.X1 – SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Oglesby System’s outfall would be constructed as a co-use Arizona Department of Transportation/District facility, built in conjunction with State Route 85 (SR-85) improvements from north of Baseline Road to the Gila River. ADOT has tentatively agreed to this plan, which would require ADOT to upsize its planned freeway channel to accommodate regional flows in exchange for District cost share participation. The portion of the Oglesby System upstream of SR-85 would be completed in the future – likely without the use of public funding – as the area develops. Project schedule will depend upon ADOT’s SR-85 improvement schedule. 211.XX.X2 – Watson Drainage System Project Partner: Town of Buckeye The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The Town of Buckeye submitted the full ADMP-recommended plan to the District’s FY 2012 prioritization procedure, and the plan was recommended. The Watson System will be the first to be implemented. A pre-design effort is anticipated to begin in FY 2012 or FY 2013. 211.XX.X3 – Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet Project Partner: Town of Buckeye Skyline Wash originates in the White Tanks Mountains and results in alluvial fan-type flood flows downstream. Flows ultimately pond behind Buckeye FRS No.3 and subsequently drain to the Hassayampa River. The Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet Project is a variation on a recommendation identified by the District’s Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan. The project proposes to construct a basin at the apex of the alluvial fan floodplain and to convey flows through a combination of new channels and existing natural washes to the Buckeye FRS No.3. The project would result in elimination of the alluvial fan floodplain, impacting both existing properties and future development. Project implementation is awaiting a cost share agreement between the District and the Town of Buckeye. 265.01.30 – Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project (265A) Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The City initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. With the City as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the selection of an outfall alignment south of McKellips Road by the SRPMIC. 300.01.31 – Spook Hill FRS / Red Mountain Freeway Modification (300A) Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation Spook Hill FRS is a structural plan element of a Watershed Work Plan, prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) in January 1963, for the Buckhorn-Mesa Watershed Project located in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The dam was designed to impound floodwaters for a 100-year flood event and direct flows in excess of the 100-year flood event through an emergency spillway. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) was the lead agency in an effort to modify Spook Hill FRS to accommodate construction of the Power Road to University Drive segment of the Loop 202 freeway, which passes over the dam and within the dam's floodway. Modifications were completed in FY 2009 and corrected all identified dam safety deficiencies through installation of a central filter throughout the dam to protect against cracking, slope erosion repair, and replacement of the principal spillway. 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The District will provide easements to ADOT on District land, generating revenue that is expected to completely offset its $5 million contribution to the modification costs. Easement value is under legal negotiation, and the project remains active pending settlement. 310.01.30 – PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement (310A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS), the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the Loop 202 San Tan Freeway. The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. The FFMA recommended rehabilitation of the structures which could include structural improvements to the dam or replacement of the dams with channels, basins or other flood control facilities. The District has initiated a study to propose an ultimate recommended solution for the structures. Following alternative selection, the District would pursue federal cost share funding, with implementation likely occurring late in the five-year CIP. 310.01.31 – Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation (310B) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate reservoir storage monitoring and warning procedures have been put in place for this sitespecific condition at the dam. Site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, are required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall rehabilitation or replacement. Construction of the interim dam safety measures is in progress and is expected to be completed during FY 2012. 330.01.30 – Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction (330A) Project Partner: N/A Harquahala FRS is a compact earth-fill dam which detains floodwater from the southwest side of the Big Horn Mountains, the Harquahala Plain and Saddle Mountain. The water is conveyed to the Harquahala Floodway and the Saddleback Diversion Channel and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 11.5 miles in length. Harquahala FRS has exposed earthen slopes that will be subject to long-term erosion. This project provides a comprehensive rock mulch and hydroseed treatment for the slopes that will reduce this hazard and increase the dam’s life. Project schedule will depend upon funding availability. 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 331.01.30 – Saddleback FRS Modifications (331A) Project Partner: N/A The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for construction. The District and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service were cost share partners on the initial construction of this structure. Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Design of modifications is in progress, and construction is expected to begin in FY 2013. 343.01.31 – Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation (343A) Project Partner: Town of Wickenburg The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. The project provides a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It also conveys the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction was completed in FY 2009. The project remains active pending FEMA acceptance of revised floodplain limits. 344.01.30 – Martin Acres Flood Hazard Reduction Project (344A) Project Partner: City of Surprise The Martin Acres subdivision has historically experienced experienced flooding from the watercourse identified by the Wittmann Area Drainage Master Plan as Wash 3 East. This project proposes to address this hazard, likely through a combined channel and basin system. Details of a proposed solution will be identified through a design concept report, to be completed by the District in a partnership with the City of Surprise. Project implementation will be dependent upon design concept recommendations and District and City funding availability. 36 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 350.01.30 – Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350B) Project Partner: N/A Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modification will likely include the construction of a gated outlet with a drainage channel and a seepage collection system at the downstream abutment contacts. Initial investigations are in progress. 350.01.31 – Cave Buttes Dam Additional Access Rights Acquisition (350A) Project Partner: N/A A survey of District land rights identified additional rights required for operations and maintenance access to Cave Buttes Dam. The District intends to acquire a roadway easement from the Arizona State Land Department. Acquisition is expected to occur during FY 2012. 370.XX.X1 – New River Dam Outlet Improvements (TBD) Project Partner: N/A The District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the New River Dam and associated works in 1985 as part of the New River and Phoenix City Streams Flood Control Project, providing enhanced flood protection for downstream Maricopa County residents, and the District operates and maintains the dam. Erosion related to the dam’s outlet channel will potentially impact District maintenance access, and has caused outlet flow restrictions and resultant stagnant impoundments contrary to design specifications. District engineering efforts have identified that these conditions require corrective action, including improvements to the Dam’s outlet channel. 420.04.31 – Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420D) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Design is complete. Construction schedule will depend upon District and City funding availability. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 420.05.31 – Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements (420E) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project is the fourth scheduled project in support of this ADMP and likely will include construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, an interceptor drain east along McKellips Road, and an outlet generally along 94th Street. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. A design concept study is complete. The project’s implementation schedule will depend upon District and City funding availability. 442.11.31 – Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements (442B) Project Partner: City of Mesa The Siphon Draw project is the final element of the recommended plan for the East Mesa ADMP for the area south of the Superstition Freeway and north of Warner Road. The project includes a channel along Meridian Road that intercepts the flow entering Maricopa County from Pinal County and conveys the flow to a detention basin constructed east of Meridian Road and north of Elliot Road. Project construction was completed during FY 2011. The project remains active as storm-related damage is addressed. Implementation of future channel phases will require additional partnering agreements and will likely accompany construction of adjoining Meridian Road segments. 450.02.32 – Rose Garden Lane Channel (450A) Project Partner: City of Peoria The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update Study (G/P ADMPU) in May 2001 which made several recommendations for regional drainage infrastructure to provide 100year protection for the watershed. The Rose Garden Lane Channel is a high priority recommendation of the G/P ADMPU and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The City Council of Peoria adopted the recommendations of the G/P ADMPU in May 2001, and the Board of Directors of the District adopted the G/P ADMPU recommendations in December 2001 (Resolution FCD 2001R012). This project involves construction of an open channel along the north side of Rose Garden Lane and a basin at the Agua Fria River outfall, and the project will provide a 100-year level of protection for an area between approximately Lake Pleasant Road and the Agua Fria River, south of Rose Garden Lane. The channel will accept and convey flows that would otherwise flow over Rose Garden Lane and overflow the Beardsley Channel. Intergovernmental agreements between the District and the City of Peoria are in place for design and construction of the project, and the City is the lead agency for all tasks. Channel construction is complete. The basin site has been acquired, and excavation is being accomplished through a material auction at no cost to the project partners. 38 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 450.06.31 – Pinnacle Peak Rd. Drainage (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) (450D) Project Partner: City of Peoria The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale/Peoria ADMP Update (ADMPU) to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMPU recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from 87th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The City of Peoria is accomplishing the 100-year conveyance drainage component from 87th Avenue to 99th Avenue through development stipulations. This project provides for drainage from 99th Avenue west to an ultimate outfall in the Agua Fria River. The project will also provide roadway improvements along this alignment to be paid for by the City of Peoria. Construction is in progress. 450.XX.X1 – 107th Ave. and Union Hills Dr. Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Peoria, City of Surprise The area downstream of 107th Avenue and Union Hills Drive has historically experienced flooding, particularly in the City of Surprise’s Coyote Lakes subdivision. Existing drainage systems along Union Hills Drive are considered inadequate. The proposed project will likely include a combination of open channels and basins, along with utilization of existing drainage features, to relieve flooding in the area. The District is completing a design concept report. Further project implementation will be dependent upon formulation of an agreement with the cities of Peoria and Surprise, and funding availability. 470.04.30 – White Tanks FRS No. 3 Modifications (470A) Project Partner: Natural Resources Conservation Service White Tanks FRS No.3 is ranked first in the nation by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under their dam rehabilitation priority ranking process. The District and NRCS have proceeded with a rehabilitation project under the “Small Watershed Rehabilitation Amendment" (Public Law 106-472), which authorizes NRCS to assist watershed project sponsors with rehabilitation of aging dams on a 65 percent federal, 35 percent local cost share basis, and NRCS is additionally providing technical assistance for the project. The District and NRCS completed the final work plan and environmental assessment in 2004 and signed an IGA for the project early in FY 2005. In FY 2004, the District contracted an alternative evaluation and chose to modify the dam. The first phase of dam modification is complete. The first phase included plugging and abandoning existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP) outlets, construction of principal pipe outlets to replace the existing CMP outlets, and construction of a soil cement embankment section and cutoff walls in the dam's south fissure risk zone. The second and final phase of construction is in progress and includes a new emergency spillway drop structure and non-fissure risk zone embankment segments. 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 470.04.32 – White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel (470F) Project Partner: N/A In FY 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No.4. This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No.3 to White Tanks FRS No.4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Bethany Home Road south to Interstate 10 (I-10), the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. Construction is expected to begin prior to FY 2012. 470.12.31 – Reems Road Channel and Basin (470C) Project Partner: City of Surprise This project includes a flood control channel along the west side of Reems Road from south of Waddell Road to the Dysart Drain at the Falcon Dunes Golf Course, and a 42-acre basin north of Olive Avenue, providing 100-year flood protection. The District and the City of Surprise have geographically split project responsibilities, with the City being responsible for constructing the channel from Peoria Avenue north to Waddell Road, and the District being responsible for constructing the channel and basin south of Peoria Avenue, and also cost sharing with the City of Surprise on the box culvert to be constructed at Peoria Avenue. MCDOT agreed to cost share to extend box culverts at Olive and Butler to their ultimate length. The District also entered into cost-share agreements with two developers for extended box culverts on developer-owned property. Portions of the City of Surprise's component of the project are in place, and the District’s component of the project is substantially complete, with the exception of storm damage repairs that are in progress. 470.13.31 – Bullard Wash Phase II (470D) Project Partner: City of Goodyear Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This stormwater would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to I-10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City funding and will likely be phased, with work being completed outside the five-year CIP. 40 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 470.14.31 – Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470E) Project Partner: Arizona Department of Transportation The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for stormwater management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303 Loop (SR-303L). Under the District’s agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the District will be responsible for project implementation from Van Buren Street south to the Gila River, while ADOT will be responsible for project implementation the project north of Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will precede construction of SR-303L. Design is in progress. 470.15.31 – Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (470H) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, City of Glendale The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)/Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from SR-303L to Reems Road and outlets to the existing Dysart Drain. The project serves both roadway drainage and regional flood control purposes, providing 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with MCDOT and the City of Glendale. Design and right-of-way acquisition are in progress by MCDOT, and construction is anticipated to begin in FY 2012. 480.04.32 – Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480C) Project Partners: Maricopa County Dept. of Transportation, Town of Queen Creek The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2009, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The channel will collect and convey the 100-year flow to reduce flooding hazards to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the channel. Under the project cost share agreement, the District will construct improvements upstream (west and northwest) of Ellsworth Road, and the Town of Queen Creek will construct improvements downstream of Ellsworth Road. The District will additionally construct a bridge over Sonoqui Wash at Riggs Road, with bridge costs to be reimbursed by MCDOT. Construction of the District’s reach of the project is in progress. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 480.04.34 – Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480E) Project Partner: Pinal County The Queen Creek / Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of channelization has been completed. The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization will outfall to the second phase, which is being implemented by the District in partnership with the Town of Queen Creek. The third phase includes channelization of the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northeast to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is generally located in unincorporated Maricopa County and in Pinal County. The District anticipates partnering with Pinal County to share in features that serve to both improve the project’s ability to capture flows and to provide an outlet for future Pinal County improvements. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Design is in progress. 480.05.31 – Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) (480B) Project Partner: Town of Gilbert The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash from Recker to Higley roads to complete channel improvements that have already been accomplished upstream of Recker and downstream of Higley. This project replaces the existing wash with a natural desert 100-year capacity channel. Project design and construction are complete with the exception of landscaping, and the project is owned, operated and maintained by the Town of Gilbert. The project remains active pending future completion of landscape and aesthetic enhancements by the Town. 565.04.31 – 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (565A) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) was recommended by the Durango ADMP and was requested by the City of Phoenix. The project will provide an interim regional outfall channel and is the first phase of the DRCC project. Project improvements will reduce flooding hazards north of the Union Pacific Railroad and remove approximately 71 structures from an identified floodplain. The City was the lead agency for design of both the storm drain and the DRCC and is the lead agency for storm drain construction. The District is the lead agency for construction of the first phase of the DRCC. Project construction is complete with the exception of the 75th Avenue Storm Drain crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad. 42 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 565.04.32 – Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) (565B) Project Partner: City of Avondale The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. th This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107 Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the FY 2003 Prioritization Procedure, and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. Project implementation is awaiting an IGA between the District and the City of Avondale. 565.04.33 – Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) (565C) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. th This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75 Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. The project will construct basins along the channel alignment and box culverts connecting the linear basins. Upon completion, the project will serve to drain the area to the downstream channel in the City of Avondale. Design is in progress. 565.XX.X1 – Van Buren Street Channel (99th Avenue to Agua Fria River) Project Partner: City of Avondale This project, proposed by the City of Avondale, will provide a drainage outlet along Van Buren Street, conveying flows to the Agua Fria River. In addition to alleviating an existing flooding hazard at the 99th Avenue and Van Buren Street intersection, the project would provide an outlet for Avondale’s future city center. The District is completing a design concept study, as the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. Following completion of the study, the District may negotiate agreements with the City of Avondale for implementation. 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 620.03.33 – Camelback Road Storm Drain (59th Avenue to 75th Avenue) (620F) Project Partners: City of Phoenix, City of Glendale The Camelback Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the cities of Phoenix and Glendale. The project consists of a trunk line in Camelback Road with capacity for a 10-year storm event and lateral storm drains aiding in collection. The storm drain ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. Construction is in progress. 620.03.34 – Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) (620G) Project Partner: City of Glendale The Bethany Home Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The City of Glendale is the lead agency for project design and construction. Design of the storm drain from approximately 71st Avenue to 79th Avenue is in progress by the City of Glendale, and construction timing will be dependent upon City and District funding availability. 625.01.30 – Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625J) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The FY 2008 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project’s design involves the installation of various drainage features, generally along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. When combined with the complete downtown system recommended by the ADMP, this project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. Construction of the Fillmore Street components and of a Jefferson Street sub-phase is in progress by the City. 625.02.30 – Old Cross Cut Canal (Arizona Canal to Indian School Road) (625K) Project Partner: City of Phoenix Phoenix’s Arcadia neighborhood has historically suffered from flooding, as flows originating from Camelback Mountain pond against the Arizona Canal, and no substantial drainage outlet existed. 44 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District This project improves the Old Cross Cut Canal earthen ditch, constructing two large diameter pipe culverts from Indian School Road to the north side of the Arizona Canal. This completes earlier downstream improvements to the Old Cross Cut Canal from Indian School Road to the Salt River. Canal improvements will allow the canal to jointly serve as an outlet for a future upstream drainage system in the Arcadia area. Construction is in progress. 625.02.32 – Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback to Lafayette) (625L) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase includes construction of an outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvements Project. Later phases will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard, intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. This project will provide the outlet from Camelback Road to the Old Cross Cut Canal. City funding for these future phases will likely require future bond elections, and schedule would be dependent on funding availability. 625.02.33 – Lafayette Interceptor Drain and Outlet (625M) Project Partner: City of Phoenix The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase includes construction of an outfall – the Old Cross Cut Canal Improvements Project. Later phases will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard, intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. Lafayette Boulevard improvements are in design. Construction timing will be dependent upon District and City funding availability. 698.10.30 – East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698A) Project Partner: N/A Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately owned golf courses. Maintenance road improvements in progress. 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Project Reserve (FCPR) Project Partner: N/A The project reserve provides contingency funding for unforeseen schedule or cost estimate changes. 46 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 93,815,245 8,424,046 Project Total $ 102,239,291 Previous Cost by Sub-Project Actuals Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements (022.01.32 - 022A) $ 3,050 Upper Camelback Wash Improvements (027.10.32 - 027A) 43,212 Cloud Rd. & Sossaman Rd. Basin and Outlet (043.01.30 - 043A) 1,826,038 Vulcan Materials Settlement Acquisition (109.01.30 - 109B) Agua Fria River Levee Safety Improvements (109.02.30 - 109A) Laveen Area Conveyance Channel (117.08.31 - 117A) 1,111,506 23rd Ave. & Roeser Rd. Storm Drain and Detention Basin (117.09.31 - 117B) 184,031 27th Ave. & South Mountain Ave. Basin (117.09.32 - TBD) 43rd Ave. & Baseline Rd. Basin (117.09.33 - TBD) Arizona Canal Diversion Channel Improvements (118.01.30 - 118A) 1,036,086 Berneil Channel Modifications (120.XX.X1 - TBD) Rittenhouse Basin (121.03.32 - 121A) 8,198,701 Chandler Heights Basin (121.03.33 - 121B) 3,039,005 East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel (121.XX.X1 - TBD) Tres Rios (126.01.31 - 126A) 155,041 White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet (201.01.31 - 201A) 2,520 White Tanks FRS No.4 Rehabilitation (201.02.31 - 201B) 1,711,049 McMicken Dam (202.02.31 - 202B) 523,492 Buckeye FRS No.1 Rehabilitation (207.01.31 - 207A) 368,349 Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin & Storm Drain (211.03.31 - 211A) 490,879 SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel (211.XX.X1 - TBD) Watson Drainage System (211.XX.X2 - TBD) Skyline Wash Basin and Outlet (211.XX.X3 - TBD) Granite Reef Wash Drainage Improvements (265.01.30 - 265A) Spook Hill FRS / SR-202L Modification (300.01.31 - 300A) 566,602 PVR Rehabilitation / Replacement (310.01.30 - 310A) 710,611 Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation (310.01.31 - 310B) 260,656 Harquahala FRS Erosion Hazard Reduction (330.01.30 - TBD) Saddleback FRS Modifications (331.01.30 - 331A) 153,454 Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation (343.01.31 - 343A) 10,398,773 Martin Acres Flood Hazard Mitigation (344.01.30 - 344A) Cave Buttes Dam Modifications (350.01.30 - 350B) 67,543 Cave Buttes Access Rights Acquisition (350.01.31 - 350A) 747,125 New River Dam Outlet Improvements (370.XX.X1 - TBD) Oak St. Detention Basin and Storm Drain (420.04.31 - 420D) 207,671 Ellsworth Rd. & McKellips Rd. Drainage System (420.05.31 - 420E) 118,765 Rose Garden Lane Channel (450.02.32 - 450A) 4,327,609 Pinnacle Peak Rd. Channel (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) (450.06.31 - 450D) 1,389,599 107th Ave. & Union Hills Dr. Drainage Improvements (450.XX.X1 - TBD) White Tanks FRS No.3 Modifications (470.04.30 - 470A) 16,946,273 White Tanks FRS No.3 Outlet Channel (470.04.32 - 470F) 6,655,304 Reems Road Channel and Basin (470.12.31 - 470C) 10,784,779 Bullard Wash (Phase II) (470.13.31 - 470D) 86,930 Loop 303 Drainage Improvements (470.14.31 - 470E) 6,081,216 Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (470.15.31 - 470H) 23,297 Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) (480.04.32 - 480C) 2,008,616 Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) (480.04.34 - 480E) 559,286 Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) (480.05.31 - 480B) 450,791 75th Ave. Storm Drain and DRCC Phase I (565.04.31 - 565A) 14,642,157 DRCC (107th Ave. to Agua Fria) (565.04.32 - 565B) 79,555 DRCC (75th Ave. to 107th Ave.) (565.04.33 - 565C) 3,390,982 Van Buren St. Channel (99th Ave. to Agua Fria River) (565.XX.X1 - TBD) Camelback Rd. Storm Drain (59th Ave. to 75th Ave.) (620.03.33 - 620F) 1,564,305 Bethany Home Rd. Storm Drain (79th Ave. to 59th Ave.) (620.03.34 - 620G) 2,269 Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) (625.01.30 - 625J) 1,048,937 Old Cross Cut Canal (Arizona Canal to Indian School Rd.) (625.02.30 - 625K) 273,226 Arcadia Drive Storm Drain (Camelback Rd. to Lafayette Blvd.) (625.02.32 - 625L) Lafayette Interceptor Drain & Outlet (625.02.33 - 625M) East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving (698.10.30 - 698A) Budget Lineholder: FY2011 Projects Not in FY 2012-2016 CIP Flood Control Project Reserve (FCPR) Project Total $ 102,239,291 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 2011 $ 48,884,000 9,383,000 $ 58,267,000 Projected FY 2011 $ 5,000 305,000 914,000 14,000 48,000 53,000 50,000 50,000 1,070,000 535,000 281,000 551,000 1,151,000 20,000 735,000 585,000 40,000 120,000 809,000 1,561,000 20,000 203,000 35,000 40,000 591,000 30,000 70,000 349,000 10,000 5,000 3,776,000 8,908,000 1,729,000 1,616,000 9,000 1,913,000 775,000 8,055,000 2,505,000 1,000 369,000 15,000 1,787,000 8,132,000 10,000 1,334,000 2,311,000 422,000 521,000 531,000 3,298,000 $ 58,267,000 $ $ $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 47 Year 1 FY 2012 46,313,000 11,637,000 57,950,000 Year 1 FY 2012 5,000 3,039,000 825,000 107,000 60,000 5,000 420,000 420,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,060,000 394,000 2,151,000 50,000 990,000 25,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 220,000 749,000 3,146,000 30,000 641,000 10,000 190,000 300,000 170,000 840,000 125,000 435,000 10,000 805,000 10,000 173,000 14,765,000 20,000 10,000 3,484,000 2,550,000 9,589,000 1,188,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 2,995,000 1,582,000 5,000 1,423,000 20,000 619,000 20,000 2,105,000 57,950,000 $ $ $ $ Year 2 FY 2013 49,078,000 3,922,000 53,000,000 Year 2 FY 2013 145,000 5,334,000 5,000 10,000 1,420,000 1,550,000 5,000 5,000 28,000 2,445,000 566,000 1,285,000 2,020,000 520,000 685,000 800,000 540,000 1,350,000 20,000 5,000 2,150,000 460,000 260,000 20,000 1,960,000 235,000 10,000 900,000 20,000 1,704,000 10,000 8,400,000 1,550,000 120,000 5,205,000 5,000 10,000 11,125,000 5,000 5,000 50,000 58,000 53,000,000 $ $ $ $ Year 3 FY 2014 30,758,000 15,242,000 46,000,000 Year 3 FY 2014 10,000 10,000 1,420,000 585,000 5,000 5,000 6,230,000 10,780,000 1,140,000 7,620,000 20,000 850,000 50,000 540,000 1,350,000 5,000 40,000 980,000 535,000 1,930,000 1,100,000 10,000 1,060,000 10,000 5,200,000 10,000 50,000 5,000 10,000 2,000,000 5,000 5,000 2,320,000 110,000 46,000,000 $ $ $ $ Year 4 FY 2015 33,224,000 11,776,000 45,000,000 Year 4 FY 2015 20,000 5,000 20,000 20,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 3,550,000 2,568,000 5,400,000 1,520,000 420,000 850,000 600,000 5,060,000 1,350,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 180,000 40,000 3,150,000 6,150,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 7,190,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 5,000 435,000 4,240,000 2,067,000 45,000,000 $ $ $ $ Year 5 FY 2016 39,200,000 6,800,000 46,000,000 Year 5 FY 2016 1,290,000 230,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 50,000 50,000 7,250,000 60,000 30,000 3,050,000 30,000 30,000 10,100,000 5,200,000 5,000 4,150,000 5,295,000 2,100,000 20,000 10,000 40,000 5,000 30,000 10,000 30,000 1,050,000 1,800,000 2,125,000 1,925,000 46,000,000 5-Year Total $ 198,573,000 49,377,000 $ 247,950,000 5-Year Total $ 1,470,000 8,383,000 830,000 107,000 235,000 70,000 5,000 3,280,000 2,575,000 5,000 20,000 30,000 25,000 50,000 1,088,000 9,079,000 17,097,000 12,293,000 16,090,000 2,115,000 3,470,000 2,455,000 1,520,000 16,290,000 220,000 9,999,000 3,166,000 50,000 2,841,000 10,000 5,800,000 6,570,000 170,000 860,000 4,055,000 4,920,000 30,000 805,000 10,220,000 193,000 16,469,000 20,000 60,000 17,124,000 4,100,000 9,739,000 13,673,000 25,000 10,000 70,000 16,140,000 30,000 1,582,000 1,085,000 3,238,000 20,000 2,560,000 7,229,000 20,000 6,265,000 $ 247,950,000 Total Project $ 341,272,245 67,184,046 $ 408,456,291 Total Project $ 1,478,050 8,731,212 3,570,038 121,000 235,000 1,229,506 242,031 3,330,000 2,625,000 2,111,086 20,000 8,763,701 3,064,005 50,000 1,524,041 9,632,520 19,959,049 12,836,492 17,193,349 3,190,879 3,470,000 2,455,000 1,520,000 16,330,000 906,602 11,518,611 4,987,656 70,000 3,197,454 10,443,773 5,840,000 7,228,543 947,125 930,000 4,611,671 5,048,765 4,362,609 5,970,599 10,220,000 26,047,273 24,853,304 12,420,779 155,930 25,118,216 4,898,297 19,802,616 16,737,286 476,791 15,021,157 164,555 21,317,982 30,000 11,278,305 1,097,269 5,620,937 2,604,226 2,560,000 7,651,000 541,000 531,000 9,563,000 $ 408,456,291 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Small Projects Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District See Project Descriptions Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects 6th Street and Western Avenue Drainage Improvements Cave Creek Flood Hazard Reduction Hibbert and 1st Street Drainage Improvements Mesa Vista Drainage Improvements 525 East Mountain View Road Drainage Improvements 1525 West Helena Drive Drainage Improvements Bethany Home Road and 5th Avenue Drainage Improvements 69th Place and Avalon Drive Drainage Improvements 69th Place and Windsor Avenue Drainage Improvements 3201 North 66th Street Drainage Improvements District Scheduled Completion All 5 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 N/A FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 Purpose Statement: The Small Projects Assistance Program provides limited District funding for local drainage improvements that reduce flood flows where realized property flooding has historically occurred. Project Descriptions: 699.XX.X1 – Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects Project Partner: N/A Using objective criteria, the Small Project Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. 699.12.30 – 6th Street and Western Avenue Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Avondale The City of Avondale proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring tenth among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.31 – Cave Creek Flood Hazard Reduction Project Partner: Town of Cave Creek The Town of Cave Creek proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring fourth among ten 48 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce a documented flooding/erosion hazard that has historically impacted seven residential properties. 699.12.32 – Hibbert and 1st Street Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Mesa The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring second among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.33 – Mesa Vista Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Mesa The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring eighth among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.34 – 525 East Mountain View Road Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring sixth among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of three residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.35 – 1525 West Helena Drive Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring ninth among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.36 – Bethany Home Road and 5th Avenue Drainage Improvments Project Partner: City of Phoenix The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring seventh among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of seven properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 699.12.37 – 69th Place and Avalon Drive Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring first among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of four residential properties (including two multifamily units) and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.38 – 69th Place and Windsor Avenue Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring third among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.12.39 – 3201 North 66th Street Drainage Improvements Project Partner: City of Scottsdale The City proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2012. The project was recommended, scoring fifth among ten submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of two residential properties (both multifamily units) and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ Projected FY 2011 1,505,000 1,505,000 Projected FY 2011 $ 1,505,000 $ 1,505,000 - $ - $ Previous Cost by Sub-Project Actuals Small Projects Assistance Program (Unallocated) (699.XX.X1 - N/A) $ Budget Lineholder: FY2011 Projects Not in FY 2012-2016 CIP 6th St. and Western Ave. Drainage Improvements (699.12.30 - TBD) Cave Creek Flood Hazard Reduction (699.12.31 - TBD) Hibbert and 1st Street Drainage Improvements (699.12.32 - TBD) Mesa Vista Drainage Improvements (699.12.33 - TBD) 525 East Mountain View Rd. Drainage Improvements (699.12.34 - TBD) 1525 West Helena Dr. Drainage Improvements (699.12.35 - TBD) Bethany Home Rd. and 5th Ave. Drainage Improvements (699.12.36 - TBD) 69th Pl. and Avalon Dr. Drainage Improvements (699.12.37 - TBD) 69th Pl. and Windsor Ave. Drainage Improvements (699.12.38 - TBD) 3201 N. 66th St. Drainage Improvements (699.12.39 - TBD) Project Total $ - Year 1 FY 2012 2,000,000 2,000,000 Year 1 FY 2012 $ 106,000 190,000 252,000 252,000 250,000 252,000 252,000 227,000 152,000 42,000 25,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 50 Year 2 FY 2013 2,000,000 2,000,000 Year 2 FY 2013 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ Year 3 FY 2014 2,000,000 2,000,000 Year 3 FY 2014 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 2015 2,000,000 2,000,000 Year 4 FY 2015 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 2016 2,000,000 2,000,000 Year 5 FY 2016 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ $ 5-Year Total $ 10,000,000 $ $ 10,000,000 $ 5-Year Total $ 8,106,000 $ 190,000 252,000 252,000 250,000 252,000 252,000 227,000 152,000 42,000 25,000 $ 10,000,000 $ Total Project 11,505,000 11,505,000 Total Project 8,106,000 1,505,000 190,000 252,000 252,000 250,000 252,000 252,000 227,000 152,000 42,000 25,000 11,505,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Managing Department: Project Partners: Flood Control District None Scheduled Completion Dates: Improvement Unallocated Floodprone Properties Acquisitions Bible (502-36-101Q) District Scheduled Completion All 4 N/A FY 2012 Purpose Statement: The Floodprone Properties Assistance Program provides limited District funding for acquisition and demolition of floodprone homes that cannot feasibly or cost-effectively be protected by structural projects. Project Descriptions: 700.XX.X1 – Unallocated Small Project Assistance Program Projects Using objective criteria, the Floodprone Properties Assistance Program evaluates new projects annually. This line item provides funding for future (indeterminate) projects. 700.10.32 – Bible (502-36-101Q) The Bible property was recommended for acquisition/demolition under the FY 2010 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program evaluation process. The property has been acquired, and demolition and relocation are anticipated to be completed by FY 2012. Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 155,800 155,800 Previous Cost by Sub-Project Actuals Floodprone Properties Acquisition (Unallocated) (700.XX.X1 - N/A) $ Budget Lineholder: FY2011 Projects Not in FY 2012-2016 CIP 151,572 FPAP: Bible (502-36-101Q) (700.10.32 - 700K) 4,228 Project Total $ 155,800 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Projected FY 2011 228,000 228,000 Projected FY 2011 $ 62,000 166,000 $ 228,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 2012 50,000 50,000 Year 1 FY 2012 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 51 Year 2 FY 2013 $ $ Year 3 FY 2014 - $ - $ Year 2 FY 2013 $ $ Year 4 FY 2015 - $ - $ Year 3 FY 2014 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 2016 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 2015 - $ - $ - $ - $ Year 5 FY 2016 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 50,000 50,000 5-Year Total 50,000 50,000 Total Project 433,800 433,800 Total Project $ 213,572 220,228 $ 433,800 $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Approve the Library District FY 2012 Budget in the amount of $24,564,950 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Library District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Library District’s FY 2012 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District revenue budget for FY 2012 is $23,156,214 and expenditure budget for FY 2012 is $24,564,950. The tax levy will decrease from FY 2011 to FY 2012 from $20,479,676 to $19,070,066 based on the median residential owner’s tax levy remaining constant. The tax rate will increase from $0.0412 to $0.0492 per $100 of assessed value. The White Tank Library opened in FY 2011. It is a state of the art facility built in partnership with the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department. It is designed to be extremely environmentally friendly, from the exterior that blends with the surrounding park, to the lighting and power systems that have earned the building a Platinum Certification in accordance with rating standards recognized by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) with Net Zero Pollution. The new library was the first public library in Arizona to get that designation, and only the fourth in the nation. Library District Property Tax Revenue FY 2010 through FY 2012 $20,500,000 $20,000,000 $19,500,000 $19,000,000 $18,500,000 $18,000,000 FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget Use of the District library facilities continues to grow for traditional services as well as electronic services. Freegal service allows the library user to download music. Overdrive service allows for downloadable books. The District is working on providing downloadable movies as well. The FY 2012 budget also includes onetime expenditure authority that will allow the District to convert the last seven branches to the Deweyless system. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 55 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Carmine L. Davis, Management and Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: Customer satisfaction was 87.3% in FY 2010 with the library's collection of books and other materials. The FY 2011 Customer Satisfaction Survey will commence in April 2011. Individual Empowerment Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: Through February 2011, 1,158 Youth Programs have been presented to 36,638 children. The Summer Reading Program in 2010 saw 29,708 children and teens registered. Pre-readers (0-5) had a 47.4% completion rate, kids (6-11) had a 43.6% completion rate and teens (12-18) had a 48% completion rate. Department Specific By December 31, 2010, have a new contract in place that includes the ability to add new formats and vendors. Status: As of February 2011, the procurement of contract is complete, but is pending Board approval. 57 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL ELIMINATIONS TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 15,523,850 $ - $ 692,024 $ 16,215,874 $ - $ 16,215,874 SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES FINES & FORFEITS INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES 18,879,365 320,352 2,945,144 23,629 723,750 50,000 130,410 $ 23,072,650 $ - $ 18,879,365 320,352 2,945,144 23,629 723,750 50,000 130,410 - $ 23,072,650 $ 18,879,365 320,352 2,945,144 23,629 723,750 50,000 130,410 - $ 23,072,650 NON-RECURRING GRANTS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES 43,564 40,000 83,564 - - 43,564 40,000 83,564 - 43,564 40,000 83,564 TOTAL SOURCES $ 23,156,214 $ - $ - $ 23,156,214 $ - $ 23,156,214 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 11,283,528 $ 5,210,159 5,556,699 $ 22,050,386 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,283,528 $ 5,210,159 5,556,699 - $ 22,050,386 $ - $ 11,283,528 5,210,159 5,556,699 - $ 22,050,386 NON-RECURRING SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES TOTAL USES 1,560,000 576,564 378,000 2,514,564 - - 1,560,000 576,564 378,000 2,514,564 - 1,560,000 576,564 378,000 2,514,564 $ 24,564,950 $ - $ - $ 24,564,950 $ - $ 24,564,950 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ - $ - - ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 14,115,114 $ 1,022,264 $ - 58 $ $ 1,022,264 $ 692,024 $ 14,807,138 $ $ 1,022,264 - $ 14,807,138 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2011 ADOPTED 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT LIBRARY DISTRICT TECH PHASE II LIBRARY BLDG WHITE TANK All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011 REVISED FY 2012 ADOPTED (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 19,176,257 $ 19,176,257 $ 19,401,590 $ 368,582 377,282 2,398,000 $ 19,544,839 $ 19,553,539 $ 21,799,590 $ $ - $ 115,000 $ (225,333) (2,020,718) (2,246,051) 83,564 $ 31,436 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,648,796 $ 86,364 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 5,540,000 5,540,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ $ 28,088,417 $ 28,212,117 $ 24,564,950 $ 59 500,000 5,540,000 6,040,000 (231,582) (231,582) 3,647,167 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $24,564,950 Fund Balance $1,408,736 6% Property Taxes $18,879,365 77% Intergovernmental & Grants $3,332,689 13% Miscellaneous & Interest $220,410 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $723,750 3% Uses of Funds $24,564,950 Information Technology $2,124,409 9% Administrative Services $2,747,094 11% Public Library Service $19,693,447 80% 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2010 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 3,967,148 $ 3,967,148 $ 4,504,728 $ 4,504,728 $ 4,628,428 $ 4,628,428 $ 5,074,292 $ 5,074,292 $ 3,882,868 $ 3,882,868 $ (745,560) (745,560) FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ 51 $ 52,847 52,898 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - 0.0% N/A 0.0% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 16,502,606 $ 16,502,606 $ 20,573,091 $ 20,573,091 $ 20,573,091 $ 20,573,091 $ 20,629,209 $ 20,629,209 $ 19,199,717 $ 19,199,717 $ (1,373,374) (1,373,374) -6.7% -6.7% BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 83,510 $ 83,510 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $ - $ - $ 23,629 $ 23,629 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 20,606,162 $ 25,140,419 $ 25,264,119 $ 25,728,501 $ 23,156,214 $ (2,107,905) -8.3% 3,675,957 3,675,957 15.7% 15.7% 11,029 11,029 -16.1% -16.1% 87.5% 87.5% USES MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 22,348,277 $ 22,348,277 $ 23,245,697 $ 23,245,697 $ 23,369,404 $ 23,369,404 $ 22,380,363 $ 22,380,363 $ 19,693,447 $ 19,693,447 $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ 122,614 $ 319,874 225,717 1,009,842 1,678,047 $ 125,126 $ 476,548 340,543 902,841 35,654 1,880,712 $ 125,125 $ 476,547 340,542 902,838 35,654 1,880,706 $ 124,990 $ 361,026 269,103 870,809 11,886 1,637,814 $ 127,082 $ 467,850 326,718 869,524 1,791,174 $ (1,957) 8,697 13,824 33,314 35,654 89,532 -1.6% 1.8% 4.1% 3.7% 100.0% 4.8% 857,945 $ (4,251,154) 35,652 (3,357,557) $ 827,326 $ 827,326 $ 827,326 $ 827,326 $ 827,324 $ 827,324 $ 914,342 $ 41,578 955,920 $ (87,016) (41,578) (128,594) -10.5% N/A N/A -15.5% $ 307,520 $ 165,735 360,734 216,312 1,050,301 $ 397,929 $ 752,947 553,351 430,455 2,134,682 $ 397,929 $ 752,946 553,351 430,455 2,134,681 $ 493,413 $ 517,241 501,348 392,869 1,904,871 $ 461,497 $ 767,997 458,576 436,339 2,124,409 $ (63,568) (15,051) 94,775 (5,884) 10,272 -16.0% -2.0% 17.1% -1.4% 0.5% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 21,719,068 $ 28,088,417 $ 28,212,117 $ 26,750,372 $ 24,564,950 $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ 61 3,647,167 12.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2010 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 20,286,084 20,286,084 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ $ 50,000 $ 226,004 276,004 $ 2,574,722 71,510 2,646,232 $ $ FY 2011 REVISED 20,263,686 20,263,686 $ $ 540,000 $ 269,405 809,405 $ 3,052,843 3,052,843 $ $ FY 2011 FORECAST 20,263,686 20,263,686 $ $ 615,000 $ 269,405 884,405 $ 3,052,843 3,052,843 $ $ FY 2012 ADOPTED 20,263,686 20,263,686 $ $ 615,000 $ 274,312 889,312 $ 3,288,952 3,288,952 $ $ REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 18,879,365 18,879,365 $ $ (1,384,321) (1,384,321) -6.8% -6.8% 43,564 $ 320,352 363,916 $ (571,436) 50,947 (520,489) -92.9% 18.9% -58.9% 2,945,144 $ 23,629 2,968,773 $ (107,699) 23,629 (84,070) -3.5% N/A -2.8% $ SUBTOTAL $ 805,020 $ 805,020 $ 719,350 $ 719,350 $ 719,350 $ 719,350 $ 729,279 $ 729,279 $ 723,750 723,750 $ 241,723 $ 602,253 843,976 $ 90,000 $ 205,135 295,135 $ 90,000 $ 253,835 343,835 $ 116,211 $ 441,061 557,272 $ 50,000 $ 170,410 220,410 $ SUBTOTAL $ ALL REVENUES $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,857,316 $ $ 4,400 4,400 0.6% 0.6% (40,000) (83,425) (123,425) -44.4% -32.9% -35.9% (2,107,905) -8.3% $ 25,140,419 $ 25,264,119 $ 25,728,501 $ 23,156,214 $ (4,251,154) $ (4,251,154) $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - N/A N/A 25,140,419 $ 25,264,119 $ 25,728,501 $ 23,156,214 $ (2,107,905) -8.3% 20,606,162 $ 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (continued) CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % 7,273,192 $ 796,406 (92) 2,423,014 26,730 (320,872) 320,870 10,519,248 $ 7,351,979 $ 1,109,975 2,578,261 44,806 (282,315) 282,315 11,085,021 $ 7,351,979 $ 1,109,975 2,578,261 44,806 (282,315) 282,315 11,085,021 $ 7,147,112 $ 972,288 4,372 2,568,069 53,848 (12,766) 257,618 10,990,541 $ 7,321,522 $ 965,325 2,941,506 55,175 (12,800) 12,800 11,283,528 $ 30,457 144,650 (363,245) (10,369) (269,515) 269,515 (198,507) 0.4% 13.0% N/A -14.1% -23.1% -95.5% 95.5% -1.8% SUBTOTAL $ 4,830,817 $ 18,018 187,680 5,036,515 $ 5,842,774 $ 18,000 600,000 6,460,774 $ 5,871,474 $ 18,000 665,000 6,554,474 $ 5,704,674 $ 18,575 772,724 6,495,973 $ 5,752,159 $ 21,000 997,000 6,770,159 $ 119,315 (3,000) (332,000) (215,685) 2.0% -16.7% -49.9% -3.3% SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES $ 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 1,113,653 $ 501,333 726,267 2,396,583 25,848 39,015 243,075 522,872 (92,041) 92,041 5,568,646 $ 754,597 $ 700,110 669,027 2,735,809 49,700 84,800 229,300 648,245 5,871,588 $ 754,597 $ 700,110 699,027 2,735,809 49,700 84,800 229,300 648,245 5,901,588 $ 649,294 $ 798,795 666,426 2,141,457 41,987 87,480 204,874 642,313 5,232,626 $ 1,093,775 $ 689,449 743,453 2,546,827 47,650 84,800 244,913 682,396 6,133,263 $ (339,178) 10,661 (44,426) 188,982 2,050 (15,613) (34,151) (231,675) -44.9% 1.5% -6.4% 6.9% 4.1% 0.0% -6.8% -5.3% N/A N/A -3.9% CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS $ 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ 4,411,988 $ 361,306 72,519 4,845,813 $ 3,700,000 $ 800,000 112,000 59,034 4,671,034 $ 3,700,000 $ 800,000 112,000 59,034 4,671,034 $ 3,204,305 $ 655,413 112,000 59,514 4,031,232 $ - $ 378,000 378,000 $ 3,700,000 422,000 112,000 59,034 4,293,034 100.0% 52.8% 100.0% 100.0% 91.9% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 25,970,222 $ 28,088,417 $ 28,212,117 $ 26,750,372 $ 24,564,950 $ 3,647,167 12.9% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ (4,251,154) $ (4,251,154) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 21,719,068 $ 28,088,417 $ 28,212,117 $ 26,750,372 $ 24,564,950 $ 3,647,167 12.9% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON-RECURRING FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 83,564 $ 83,564 $ $ SOURCES $ 21,769,802 $ 21,769,802 $ 21,750,259 $ 25,000 21,775,259 $ 21,750,259 $ 33,700 21,783,959 $ 22,257,039 $ 30,699 22,287,738 $ 20,423,854 $ 20,423,854 $ $ SOURCES $ 3,530,748 $ 3,530,748 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ $ 49,010 $ 3,708,910 3,757,920 $ - $ 861,582 861,582 $ - $ 861,582 861,582 $ 34,320 $ 817,865 852,185 $ - $ - $ SOURCES $ (1,318,938) $ (7,183,370) (8,502,308) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ - $ 231,582 231,582 N/A -100.0% -100.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,030,622 $ (3,424,460) $ 20,606,162 $ 24,485,419 $ 655,000 $ 25,140,419 $ 24,485,419 $ 778,700 $ 25,264,119 $ 25,026,519 $ 701,982 $ 25,728,501 $ 23,072,650 $ 83,564 $ 23,156,214 $ (1,412,769) (695,136) (2,107,905) -5.8% -89.3% -8.3% 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ $ 63 (31,436) (31,436) -27.3% -27.3% (1,326,405) -6.1% (33,700) -100.0% (1,360,105) -6.2% (86,364) (86,364) -3.2% -3.2% N/A (861,582) -100.0% (861,582) -100.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function (continued) FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON-RECURRING FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 16,380 $ 16,380 $ - $ - $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 83,564 $ 83,564 $ $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 17,606,677 $ 4,131,913 21,738,590 $ 19,176,257 $ 368,582 19,544,839 $ 19,176,257 $ 377,282 19,553,539 $ 18,378,878 $ 374,282 18,753,160 $ 19,401,590 $ 2,431,000 21,832,590 $ $ $ 3,060,577 $ 3,060,577 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,648,796 $ 2,648,796 $ 86,364 86,364 3.2% 3.2% $ $ 5,405,829 $ 5,405,829 $ 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 5,418,634 $ 5,418,634 $ - $ - $ 6,040,000 6,040,000 100.0% 100.0% $ $ (1,318,938) $ (7,183,370) (8,502,308) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ - $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) N/A 100.0% 100.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 19,348,316 $ 2,370,752 $ 21,719,068 $ 21,911,417 $ 6,177,000 $ 28,088,417 $ 21,911,417 $ 6,300,700 $ 28,212,117 $ 21,114,038 $ 5,636,334 $ 26,750,372 $ 22,050,386 $ 2,514,564 $ 24,564,950 $ (138,969) 3,786,136 3,647,167 -0.6% 60.1% 12.9% 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL USES 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES 31,436 31,436 27.3% 27.3% (225,333) -1.2% (2,053,718) -544.3% (2,279,051) -11.7% Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer CAPITAL PROJECTS $ FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - NON-RECURRING TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ALL FUNDS 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - NON-RECURRING TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ 231,582 $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ (231,582) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ALL FUNDS 65 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER DESKTOP SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FY 2012 FORECAST ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 138.96 138.96 167.96 142.73 142.73 171.73 142.73 142.73 171.73 140.73 140.73 169.73 141.73 141.73 170.73 (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (0.7%) (0.7%) (0.6%) Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Deputy Director Director - Library Executive Assistant Financial Supervisor - Dept Financial Support Supv - Dept Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Specialist Human Resources Supervisor IT Division Manager IT Senior Manager Librarian Library Administrator Library Clerk Library Coordinator Library Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Network Engineer - Sr/Ld Office Assistant PC/LAN Tech Support Planner Planner - Facilities Systems Admin & Analysis Supv Systems/Network Administrator Systems/Network Admin-Sr/Ld Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer-Sr/Ld Department Total FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.00 32.00 42.72 48.49 10.00 9.00 1.24 1.24 27.00 25.00 18.00 19.00 6.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 167.96 171.73 66 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% N/A 32.00 31.00 31.00 (1.00) (3.1%) 3.00 3.00 3.00 N/A 48.49 49.49 49.49 1.00 2.1% 12.00 12.00 12.00 N/A 9.00 3.00 3.00 (6.00) (66.7%) 1.24 1.24 1.24 0.0% 25.00 22.00 22.00 (3.00) (12.0%) 19.00 11.00 11.00 (8.00) (42.1%) 4.00 4.00 5.00 1.00 25.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 100.0% 1.00 (1.00) (100.0%) 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.0% N/A 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0% 171.73 169.73 170.73 (1.00) (0.6% ) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Fund FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED ADOPTED 130.97 140.73 36.99 31.00 167.96 171.73 DEPARTMENT/FUND 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Department Total FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 REVISED TO ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 140.73 138.73 139.73 (1.00) (0.7%) 31.00 31.00 31.00 0.0% 171.73 169.73 170.73 (1.00) (0.6% ) Programs and Activities Public Library Service Program The purpose of the Public Library Service Program is to provide resources, activities and skilled assistance to our customers so they can meet their needs, interests and goals. Program Results Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the program/activity was valuable to them Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner FY 2010 ACTUAL 48.1% FY 2011 FY 2011 REVISED FORECAST 48.1% 48.1% FY 2012 ADOPTED 48.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 99.7% 99.7% 95.0% 95.0% (4.7%) -4.7% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 0.0% 0.0% 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include:  Public Library Services Public Library Services Activity The purpose of the Public Library Services Activity is to provide skilled assistance/referral, information literacy training, resources and activities to our customers so they can get the information they want in a timely manner and that they may find enjoyment, personal development and cultural enrichment. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Measure Type Result Result Result Result Output Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of customers who rate overall library services as excellent Percent of customers who report that the program/activity was valuable to them Percent of customers who report they are satisfied with the range of library programs and activities offered Percent of customers who say they can find items in a timely manner Number of items circulated Number of library cards issued Number of programs/activities offered Number of items to be circulated Expenditure per item circulated Library District FY 2010 ACTUAL 48.1% FY 2011 FY 2011 REVISED FORECAST 48.1% 48.1% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% FY 2012 ADOPTED 48.1% 99.7% 99.7% 95.0% 95.0% (4.7%) -4.7% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 0.0% 0.0% 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% 85.8% 0.0% 0.0% (7,756) (224) 0.46 0.0% -13.4% -6.9% 0.0% 15.7% (31,436) (37,760) (86,364) (821,582) 231,582 (745,560) -27.3% -3.2% -3.2% -100.0% -100.0% -16.1% 31,436 (2,250,261) 86,364 6,040,000 (231,582) $ 3,675,957 27.3% -15.3% 3.2% 100.0% 100.0% 15.7% 7,474,730 57,756 3,224 8,400,000 $ 2.99 8,000,000 57,756 3,224 8,400,000 $ 2.92 8,000,000 49,112 3,224 8,400,000 $ 2.80 8,000,000 50,000 3,000 8,400,000 $ 2.46 $ $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES 50,000 $ 115,000 $ 85,000 $ 83,564 988,459 1,188,268 1,654,277 1,150,508 3,530,748 2,735,160 2,735,160 2,648,796 3,649,095 821,582 831,437 (4,251,154) (231,582) (231,582) $ 3,967,148 $ 4,628,428 $ 5,074,292 $ 3,882,868 $ $ 242 - LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL 465 - LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ Expenditure 16,380 $ 115,000 $ 75,000 $ 83,564 18,116,645 14,710,826 14,383,151 16,961,087 3,060,577 2,735,160 2,735,160 2,648,796 5,405,829 6,040,000 5,418,634 (4,251,154) (231,582) (231,582) $ 22,348,277 $ 23,369,404 $ 22,380,363 $ 19,693,447 Activity Narrative: The Library District Fund (244) has an in expenditures increase due to one-time costs for the De-Dewey Project, materials handling equipment replacement, Polaris implementation, miscellaneous computer replacements, Microsoft 2010 Software Assurance Upgrade and website redesign software and implementation. There are no scheduled projects in FY 2012, therefore, the Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) has no revenues or expenditures. Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last ten fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2012. The tax levy will decrease slightly from FY 2011 to FY 2012. Due to the decline in property values county-wide, the tax rate will increase from $0.0412 to $0.0492 per $100 of assessed value. 68 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Fiscal Year (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy 2002 22,913,134 0.0421 9,646,430 2003 24,457,047 0.0421 10,182,607 2004 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 2005 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 2006 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 2007 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 2008 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 2009 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 2010 57,984,051 0.0353 20,468,370 2011 49,707,952 0.0412 20,479,676 2012 38,760,297 0.0492 19,070,066 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 $0.0600 $0.0500 $0.0400 $0.0300 $0.0200 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 $03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Fiscal Year The FY 2012 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $19,070,066 a slight decrease from the FY 2011 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2012 PROPERTY TAX LEVY LIBRARY DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2012 Adopted FY 2011 Adopted FY 2010 Adopted $ 38,760,296,714 $ $ 49,707,952,123 $ $ 57,984,051,718 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1cent Levy 651,121,529 $ 39,411,418,243 $ 653,895,628 $ 50,361,847,751 $ 642,894,514 $ 58,626,946,232 $ 69 3,941,142 $ 5,036,185 $ 5,862,695 $ Tax Rates SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.0492 $ 0.0412 $ 0.0353 $ 19,070,066 $ 20,479,676 $ 20,468,370 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 320,352 $ 269,405 $ 226,942 $ 19,390,418 20,749,081 20,695,312 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Levy Limit FY 2012 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2012 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 23,256,178 0.0600 FY 2012 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 19,070,066 0.0492 Amount Under Limit: $ 4,186,112 0.0108 18.0% FY 2012 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2012 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 20,697,998 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0534 FY 2012 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 19,070,066 0.0492 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 1,627,932 0.0042 FY 2012 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 124,500 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 6.65 6.13 0.52 70 $ 7.9% 7.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2011 vs. FY 2012 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2011: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2012: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ $ $ $ 148,800 0.0412 6.13 124,500 0.0492 6.13 - 0.0% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2012 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 99.0% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2012. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2012 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 19,070,066 $ 18,879,365 Rate 99% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. 71 SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2003 186,473 2004 252,593 2005 281,442 2006 270,953 2007 246,032 2008 202,829 2009 195,719 2010 226,942 2011* 269,405 2012** 320,352 * Forecast ** Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2011 FY 2012 967,206 $ 1,140,289 41,470 41,470 31,567 31,567 12,000 2,000,000 1,731,818 $ 3,052,243 $ 2,945,144 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Maricopa County Special Healthcare District (automation services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library TOTAL $ Fines and Forfeits The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart below illustrates the fines collected from FY 2010 and the anticipated amount for FY 2011 and the budget for FY 2012. Fines and Forfeits $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $‐ FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget Miscellaneous Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2010 through the FY 2012 budget. $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $‐ FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Forecast FY 2012 Budget Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. 72 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ 33,620 $ 43,620 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ 115,000 115,000 $ 85,000 85,000 $ 83,564 83,564 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 16,380 16,380 $ - $ 115,000 115,000 $ 75,000 75,000 $ 83,564 83,564 Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 33,620 33,620 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 43,620 43,620 $ $ 43,620 43,620 Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 11,534,608 $ 10,436,233 $ 10,436,233 $ 11,565,828 $ 15,100,406 $ 21,769,802 21,769,802 $ 21,750,259 25,000 21,775,259 $ 21,750,259 33,700 21,783,959 $ 22,257,039 30,699 22,287,738 $ 20,423,854 20,423,854 $ $ $ $ $ 17,606,677 4,131,913 21,738,590 Structural Balance $ Accounting Adjustments Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ $ 19,176,257 368,582 19,544,839 4,163,125 $ $ 8 $ $ 11,565,828 11,565,828 $ $ $ 19,176,257 377,282 19,553,539 2,574,002 $ $ - $ $ 12,666,653 12,666,653 73 $ $ $ 18,378,878 374,282 18,753,160 $ 19,401,590 2,431,000 21,832,590 2,574,002 $ 3,878,161 $ 1,022,264 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 12,666,653 12,666,653 $ $ 15,100,406 15,100,406 $ $ 13,691,670 13,691,670 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ (90,347) $ Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 3,530,748 3,530,748 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ Structural Balance Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED 865,662 $ 865,662 $ 379,824 $ 379,824 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 3,060,577 3,060,577 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,735,160 2,735,160 $ $ 2,648,796 2,648,796 $ 470,171 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 379,824 379,824 $ $ 865,662 865,662 $ $ 865,662 865,662 $ $ 379,824 379,824 $ $ 379,824 379,824 Library District Intergovernmental Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement, which may result in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 6,906,381 $ 5,348,416 $ 5,348,416 $ 5,258,473 $ 692,024 $ $ $ 34,320 817,865 852,185 $ $ 861,582 861,582 $ $ 861,582 861,582 $ $ 49,010 3,708,910 3,757,920 $ - Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 5,405,829 5,405,829 $ 6,040,000 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 6,040,000 $ 5,418,634 5,418,634 $ - Structural Balance $ 49,010 $ - $ - $ 34,320 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 5,258,473 5,258,473 $ $ 169,998 169,998 $ $ 169,998 169,998 $ $ 692,024 692,024 $ $ 692,024 692,024 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2011 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Grants LSTA Physical Collection Grant Library District AZLAPR Grant Library District AZLAPR Grant 2 Library District CW Modene Neely Grant - $ 40,000 $ 40,000 75,000 $ 10,000 25,000 30,000 10,000 40,000 40,000 75,000 10,000 25,000 30,000 10,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ (40,000) $ (40,000) (75,000) $ (10,000) (25,000) (30,000) (10,000) (40,000) (40,000) (75,000) (10,000) (25,000) (30,000) (10,000) C-65-11-002-D-00 $ C-65-11-004-M-00 C-65-11-010-M-00 C-65-11-011-M-00 C-65-11-013-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-11-002-D-00 $ C-65-11-004-M-00 C-65-11-010-M-00 C-65-11-011-M-00 C-65-11-013-M-00 FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants Library District AZLAPR Grant 2 Non Recurring Non Recurring Carry Forward - $ Agenda Item: FY 2011 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Elizabeth C Jones Trust Grants LSTA Physical Collection Grant Library District AZLAPR Grant Library District AZLAPR Grant 2 Library District CW Modene Neely Grant $ $ - $ - $ 73,564 $ 73,564 10,000 $ 10,000 73,564 73,564 10,000 10,000 83,564 $ 83,564 Agenda Item: C-65-11-011-M-00 $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 19,176,257 $ 21,750,259 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 19,176,257 $ 21,750,259 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 19,176,257 $ 21,750,259 $ 225,333 $ 167,285 58,048 - $ - $ - (35,494) (35,494) (1,290,911) 93,410 (1,384,321) 19,401,590 $ 1.2% 20,423,854 -6.1% Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Emp Health Dental Prem Realloc Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2011 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of Littchfield Library Friends of Library Donation 25,000 $ 8,700 $ 5,700 3,000 8,700 5,700 3,000 $ 377,282 $ 33,700 $ (8,700) $ (5,700) (3,000) (368,582) $ (368,582) (8,700) (5,700) (3,000) (25,000) (25,000) C-65-11-001-M-00 C-65-11-016-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-11-001-M-00 C-65-11-016-M-00 $ FY 2012 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring De-Dewey Project - Remaining Libraries Materials Handling Equipment Replacement Polaris Implementation for Glendale Public Libraries Computer Replacement Microsoft 2010 Software Assurance Upgrade Website Redesign Software & Implementation 368,582 $ Agenda Item: FY 2011 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Friends of Littchfield Library Friends of Library Donation Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring $ $ - $ - $ 2,398,000 $ 2,398,000 - $ 2,398,000 $ - $ 33,000 $ 33,000 - $ 2,431,000 $ - Agenda Item: $ 1,173,000 395,000 300,000 300,000 80,000 150,000 FY 2012 Tentative Budget Adjustments: Agenda Item: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Summer Reading Program & the New Friends of the North Valley Regional Library FY 2012 Adopted Budget 76 $ 33,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 45,524 $ 34,596 10,928 (45,524) $ (45,524) (86,364) $ (86,364) (86,364) (86,364) 2,648,796 $ -3.2% 2,648,796 -3.2% Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Emp Health Dental Prem Realloc Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Personnel Savings Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ - $ 321,582 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ - $ 321,582 $ - $ - (321,582) (321,582) FY 2012 Budget Target $ - $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ - $ Expenditures Revenue Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Agenda Item: - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 5,540,000 $ 540,000 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 5,540,000 $ 540,000 $ (5,540,000) $ (5,540,000) (540,000) (540,000) FY 2012 Budget Target $ - $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ - $ Expenditures Revenue - FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 500,000 $ - FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 500,000 $ - $ (500,000) $ (500,000) - FY 2012 Budget Target $ - $ - FY 2012 Adopted Budget $ - $ - Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: - TECHNOLOGY Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Approve the Stadium District FY 2012 Budget in the amount of $8,391,083 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Stadium District. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Stadium District’s FY 2012 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4232 submit a copy of the Stadium District FY 2012 Final Budget to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 79 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s Adopted expenditure budget for FY 2012 is $8,391,083 and the Adopted revenue budget is $9,871,619. Chase Field is now entering its 14th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility and the strategic goal of generating on-going revenue, the District began the Roof Coating and Party Suites Renovation projects in FY 2010. These projects have been completed in this fiscal year. Under the Agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks, the District will receive 10% of the party suites premium upon completion of the renovation. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Cactus League by Fiscal Year $6,500,000 $6,493,520 Revenue $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $6,286,155 $5,000,000 $4,668,575 $4,540,274 $4,500,000 $4,321,745 $4,000,000 FY 08 Actual FY 09 Actual FY 10 Actual FY 11 Forecast FY 12 Adopted Car Rental Surcharge revenues have been decreasing and fund balance will be used to cover the debt service payment on the Cactus League bonds. This decrease in revenue will also require the use of fund balance for Cactus League operations which are normally funded with the car rental surcharge revenue. In addition, because there is no excess car rental surcharge revenue, there will be no funding turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in FY 2012. Fiscal Year Car Rental Surcharge revenues have also affected the rating by Fitch’s Bond Rating on Maricopa County Stadium District, Arizona’s revenue bonds. The bonds have been downgraded from ‘BBB+’ to ‘BBB-‘ during this fiscal year due to the expected weakness in car rental tax collections for FY 2012. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 81 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis by Mary Driessen, Senior Management and Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals Citizen Satisfaction By June, 2013, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 10% from 80% to 90% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: As of June 30, 2010, the preventive maintenance items were 100% compliant. It is estimated that as of June 30, 2011, 100% compliance will be maintained. Citizen Satisfaction By June, 2013, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 5% from 108 to 113 non-baseball events. Status: As of June 30, 2010, the number of District events held at the ballpark was 129. This is a 14% increase over the baseline number of 108. Department Specific By June, 2014, increase the number of major league baseball spring training facilities by 20% from 9 to 11 spring training facilities. Status: As of June 30, 2010, there were 10 spring training facilities. This is an 11% increase over the baseline number of 9 spring training facilities. The Department anticipates reaching the goal by the target date. Department Specific By June, 2014, the District will increase facility revenue from $600,000 to $630,000 by 5% for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: As of June 30, 2010, the District received $600,000 for non-baseball events. The Department anticipates reaching the goal by the target date. 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE DEBT SERVICE $ 11,836,807 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 8,713,547 CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 9,122,152 SUBTOTAL ELIMINATIONS $ 29,672,506 $ - TOTAL $ 29,672,506 - $ 3,200,901 1,198,123 99,750 115,500 4,614,274 $ 4,321,745 $ 300,000 1,200,000 5,821,745 $ 100 $ 4,321,845 $ - $ 3,200,901 1,198,123 1,000 400,750 750,000 750,000 864,221 2,179,721 (2,179,721) 1,615,321 $ 12,051,340 $ (2,179,721) $ 4,321,845 3,200,901 1,198,123 400,750 750,000 9,871,619 4,614,274 5,821,745 1,615,321 $ 9,871,619 NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ $ $ $ 12,051,340 $ (2,179,721) 334,153 $ 9,930 1,408,312 3,720 2,064,221 3,820,336 $ - $ 11,250 6,620,718 115,500 6,747,468 $ - $ 334,153 $ - $ 9,930 3,000 1,422,562 6,624,438 2,179,721 (2,179,721) 3,000 $ 10,570,804 $ (2,179,721) $ 334,153 9,930 1,422,562 6,624,438 8,391,083 TOTAL USES $ 3,820,336 $ 6,747,468 3,000 $ 10,570,804 $ (2,179,721) $ 8,391,083 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 793,938 $ 1,480,536 ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 12,630,745 $ NON-RECURRING $ (925,723) $ 7,787,824 84 1,612,321 $ 1,480,536 $ - $ $ 10,734,473 $ 31,153,042 $ - $ 31,153,042 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $9,871,619 Sales Taxes $4,321,845 44% Miscellaneous and Interest $5,549,774 56% Uses of Funds $8,391,083 Administrative Services $229,721 3% Stadium Operations $2,631,736 31% Cactus League Support $5,529,626 66% 86 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2010 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ 5,116,294 $ 5,365,640 10,481,934 $ 4,646,495 $ 5,449,083 10,095,578 $ 4,646,495 $ 5,449,083 10,095,578 $ 4,849,240 $ 5,231,185 10,080,425 $ 3,421,745 $ 6,350,024 9,771,769 $ (1,224,750) 900,941 (323,809) $ $ 134,773 $ 134,773 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 103,496 $ 103,496 $ 99,850 $ 99,850 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,616,707 $ 10,095,578 $ 10,095,578 $ 10,183,921 $ 9,871,619 $ $ 5,549,898 $ 2,057,707 7,607,605 $ 5,530,094 $ 4,781,944 10,312,038 $ 5,530,094 $ 6,181,947 11,712,041 $ 5,501,172 $ 5,315,796 10,816,968 $ 5,529,626 $ 2,623,755 8,153,381 $ 4,539 $ 9,446 48,693 111,405 174,083 $ 18,170 $ 16,033 38,221 31,066 103,490 $ 18,169 $ 16,033 38,220 31,065 103,487 $ 15,490 $ 24,878 46,822 90,607 177,797 $ 15,410 $ 40,079 53,190 102,087 210,766 $ 2,759 (24,046) (14,970) (71,022) (107,279) $ 31,921 $ 1,303 33,224 $ 40,967 $ 11,455 52,422 $ 40,967 $ 11,455 52,422 $ 40,974 $ 1,172 42,146 $ 26,190 $ 746 26,936 $ 14,777 10,709 25,486 36.1% 93.5% 48.6% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 7,814,912 $ 10,467,950 $ 11,867,950 $ 11,036,911 $ 8,391,083 $ 3,476,867 29.3% 99,850 99,850 (223,959) -26.4% 16.5% -3.2% N/A N/A -2.2% USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 87 468 3,558,192 3,558,660 0.0% 57.6% 30.4% 15.2% -150.0% -39.2% -228.6% -103.7% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2010 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % SUBTOTAL $ 4,668,706 4,668,706 $ 4,321,745 4,321,745 $ 4,321,745 4,321,745 $ 4,541,941 4,541,941 $ 4,321,845 4,321,845 $ 100 100 0.0% 0.0% $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ $ 3,172,991 3,172,991 $ $ 3,172,991 3,172,991 $ $ 3,174,496 3,174,496 $ $ 3,200,901 3,200,901 $ $ 27,910 27,910 0.9% 0.9% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ $ 1,196,092 1,196,092 $ $ 1,196,092 1,196,092 $ $ 1,036,604 1,036,604 $ $ 1,198,123 1,198,123 $ $ 2,031 2,031 0.2% 0.2% LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ 473,687 $ 5,356,908 5,830,595 $ 404,750 $ 1,000,000 1,404,750 $ 404,750 $ 1,000,000 1,404,750 $ 412,290 $ 1,018,590 1,430,880 $ ALL REVENUES $ 10,499,301 $ 10,095,578 $ 10,095,578 $ 10,183,921 $ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0680 - TRANSFERS IN $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 117,406 117,406 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 10,616,707 FY 2010 ACTUAL $ 10,095,578 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ 10,095,578 FY 2011 REVISED $ 10,183,921 FY 2011 FORECAST $ TOTAL SOURCES $ CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 400,750 $ 750,000 1,150,750 $ (4,000) (250,000) (254,000) -1.0% -25.0% -18.1% 9,871,619 $ (223,959) -2.2% - $ $ - N/A N/A 9,871,619 $ (223,959) -2.2% FY 2012 REVISED VS ADOPTED ADOPTED VAR % 241,845 $ 2,248 66,485 772 (11,412) 11,412 311,350 $ 284,773 $ 9,084 75,124 (11,354) 11,354 368,981 $ 284,773 $ 9,084 75,124 (11,354) 11,354 368,981 $ 229,394 $ 3,063 1,739 76,855 (45,224) 75,966 341,793 $ 256,973 $ 9,085 84,296 (41,087) 24,886 334,153 $ 27,800 9.8% (1) 0.0% N/A (9,172) -12.2% N/A 29,733 261.9% (13,532) -119.2% 34,828 9.4% SUBTOTAL $ 1,666 $ 1,666 $ 3,430 $ 2,500 5,930 $ 3,430 $ 2,500 5,930 $ 2,358 $ 2,500 4,858 $ 3,430 $ 6,500 9,930 $ 0.0% (4,000) -160.0% (4,000) -67.5% SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 64,029 $ 272,951 23,689 417,178 1,544 416 1,176 111 91 781,185 $ 65,000 $ 727,619 2,098,921 575,335 1,684 3,850 5,550 400 875 3,479,234 $ 65,000 $ 727,619 3,498,921 575,335 1,684 3,850 5,550 400 875 4,879,234 $ 68,022 $ 603,758 2,985,005 409,400 1,227 2,280 5,277 162 337 951 4,076,419 $ 75,298 $ 776,414 1,421 545,929 1,600 3,850 5,550 400 875 11,225 1,422,562 $ (10,298) (48,795) 3,497,500 29,406 84 (11,225) 3,456,672 -15.8% -6.7% 100.0% 5.1% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 70.8% SUBTOTAL $ 6,603,305 $ 6,603,305 $ 6,613,805 $ 6,613,805 $ 6,613,805 $ 6,613,805 $ 6,613,805 $ 36 6,613,841 $ 6,624,438 $ 6,624,438 $ (10,633) (10,633) -0.2% N/A -0.2% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 7,697,506 $ 10,467,950 $ 11,867,950 $ 11,036,911 $ 8,391,083 $ 3,476,867 29.3% OTHER FINANCING USES 0880 - TRANSFERS OUT $ ALL OTHER FINANCING USES $ 117,406 $ 117,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A N/A TOTAL USES $ 7,814,912 $ 10,467,950 $ 11,867,950 $ 11,036,911 $ 8,391,083 $ 3,476,867 29.3% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN $ $ 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ SOURCES $ 154,744 $ 154,744 $ 24,750 $ 24,750 $ 24,750 $ 24,750 $ 147,770 $ 147,770 $ 140,250 $ 140,250 $ $ SOURCES $ 4,407,578 $ 23,689 4,431,267 $ 4,444,083 $ 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ 4,444,083 $ 3,497,500 7,941,583 $ 4,280,937 $ 3,002,193 7,283,130 $ 4,474,024 $ 4,474,024 $ $ SOURCES $ 6,005,607 $ 6,005,607 $ 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 $ 6,028,218 $ 6,028,218 $ 5,821,745 $ 5,821,745 $ 20,759 20,759 $ 2,519,143 $ 126 2,519,269 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,109,281 $ 2,474 2,111,755 $ 1,615,321 $ 1,615,321 $ (997,549) (997,549) (2,477,897) $ (16,283) (2,494,180) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,097,500) (4,884,611) $ (2,787,111) $ (3,497,500) (6,284,611) $ (2,383,259) $ (3,003,693) (5,386,952) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ 10,609,175 $ 7,532 $ 10,616,707 $ FY 2010 ACTUAL 10,095,578 $ - $ 10,095,578 $ FY 2011 ADOPTED 10,095,578 $ - $ 10,095,578 $ FY 2011 REVISED 10,182,947 $ 974 $ 10,183,921 $ FY 2011 FORECAST 9,871,619 $ - $ 9,871,619 $ FY 2012 ADOPTED SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FY 2011 ADOPTED 115,500 115,500 466.7% 466.7% 29,941 0.7% (3,497,500) -100.0% (3,467,559) -43.7% 607,390 3,497,500 4,104,890 0.4% 0.4% -38.2% N/A -38.2% -21.8% -100.0% -65.3% (223,959) -2.2% N/A (223,959) -2.2% REVISED VS ADOPTED VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 20,421 $ 20,421 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 70,223 $ 70,223 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ USES $ 3,708,449 $ 23,689 3,732,138 $ 4,444,083 $ 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ 4,444,083 $ 3,497,500 7,941,583 $ 3,621,352 $ 3,000,259 6,621,611 $ 3,721,193 $ 3,721,193 $ 722,890 3,497,500 4,220,390 16.3% 100.0% 53.1% $ USES $ 6,530,344 $ 6,530,344 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,726,836 $ 6,726,836 $ 6,747,468 $ 6,747,468 $ $ 2,500 $ 23,689 26,189 $ 3,000 $ 2,097,500 2,100,500 $ 3,000 $ 3,497,500 3,500,500 $ 3,000 $ 3,002,193 3,005,193 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ USES $ (2,477,897) $ (16,283) (2,494,180) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,097,500) (4,884,611) $ (2,787,111) $ (3,497,500) (6,284,611) $ (2,383,259) $ (3,003,693) (5,386,952) $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 7,783,817 $ 31,095 $ 7,814,912 $ 8,370,450 $ 2,097,500 $ 10,467,950 $ 8,370,450 $ 3,497,500 $ 11,867,950 $ 8,038,152 $ 2,998,759 $ 11,036,911 $ 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ $ 89 (136,133) (136,133) -2.1% -2.1% 3,497,500 3,497,500 0.0% 100.0% 99.9% (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) $ (607,390) (3,497,500) (4,104,890) 21.8% 100.0% 65.3% 8,391,083 $ - $ 8,391,083 $ (20,633) 3,497,500 3,476,867 -0.2% 100.0% 29.3% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE $ FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST REQUESTED ADOPTED 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,117,693 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Non-Recurring $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Operating $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NON-RECURRING DEBT SERVICE 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,179,241 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,607,870 $ 1,607,870 $ 1,090,018 $ 864,221 $ 864,221 Operating $ 1,607,870 $ 1,607,870 $ 1,088,518 $ 864,221 $ 864,221 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ - OPERATING CAPITAL PROJECTS 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 1,607,870 $ 1,607,870 $ 1,090,018 $ 864,221 $ 864,221 OPERATING $ 1,607,870 $ 1,607,870 $ 1,088,518 $ 864,221 $ 864,221 NON-RECURRING $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ - $ 4,884,611 $ 6,284,611 $ 5,386,952 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 Operating $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,383,259 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 Non-Recurring $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,003,693 $ - $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (4,884,611) $ (6,284,611) $ (5,386,952) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) (2,179,721) TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,383,259) $ (2,179,721) $ Non-Recurring $ (2,097,500) $ (3,497,500) $ (3,003,693) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ALL FUNDS 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out Fund/Function/Transfer OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST REQUESTED ADOPTED $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,269,259 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 Operating $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,267,759 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ - 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,269,259 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 OPERATING $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,267,759 $ 2,064,221 $ 2,064,221 NON-RECURRING $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Operating $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 Non-Recurring $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - DEBT SERVICE 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING CAPITAL PROJECTS $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ - $ - $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - Operating $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Non-Recurring $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,002,193 $ - $ - $ 4,884,611 $ 6,284,611 $ 5,386,952 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 Operating $ 2,787,111 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,383,259 $ 2,179,721 $ 2,179,721 Non-Recurring $ 2,097,500 $ 3,497,500 $ 3,003,693 $ - $ - ELIMINATIONS $ (4,884,611) $ (6,284,611) $ (5,386,952) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) Operating $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,383,259) $ (2,179,721) $ (2,179,721) Non-Recurring $ (2,097,500) $ (3,497,500) $ (3,003,693) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NON-RECURRING TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS ALL FUNDS 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY 680 STADIUM DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FY 2012 FORECAST ADOPTED REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % .20 2.00 .40 .30 2.90 .25 .30 .30 .40 1.25 .25 .30 .30 .40 1.25 .25 .30 .30 .40 1.25 .20 .95 .65 .70 2.50 (.05) .65 .35 .30 1.25 (20.0%) 216.7% 116.7% 75.0% 100.0% 2.10 2.10 5.00 3.75 3.75 5.00 3.75 3.75 5.00 3.75 3.75 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00 (1.25) (1.25) - (33.3%) (33.3%) 0.0% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE STADIUM DISTRICT Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Finan/Business Analyst - Dept Office Assistant Project Manager Department Total FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2011 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2011 REVISED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2011 FY 2012 FORECAST ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Staffing By Fund DEPARTMENT/FUND 680 STADIUM DISTRICT 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Department Total FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2011 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 FY 2011 REVISED 5.00 5.00 FY 2011 FY 2012 FORECAST ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % - 0.0% 0.0% General Adjustments Base Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Decrease Regular Benefits by ($2,100) for employee health and dental fixed benefit rate based on switching from an individual department rate to a countywide rate. • Increase Regular Benefits by $2,603 for retirement contribution rate increase. Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year. FY 2010 ACTUAL N/A FY 2011 FY 2011 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% FY 2012 ADOPTED 100.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% N/A 95.0% 70.8% 70.8% (24.2%) -25.4% N/A 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year. Number of existing spring training facilities in Maricopa County for the current Fiscal Year. Number of existing and planned spring training facilities for the current Fiscal Year. Cost per existing spring training facility in Maricopa County for the current fiscal year. FY 2010 ACTUAL N/A FY 2011 FY 2011 REVISED FORECAST 5.0% 5.0% FY 2012 ADOPTED 5.0% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% N/A 10 10 10 - 0.0% N/A 10 10 10 - 0.0% N/A $ 553,009.40 $ 550,117.20 $ 552,962.60 46.80 0.0% $ Revenue 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 110,000 5,006,294 $ 5,116,294 $ 24,750 4,621,745 $ 4,646,495 $ 115,500 $ 115,500 $ 90,750 4,849,240 4,621,745 (115,500) (1,315,500) (1,315,500) $ 4,849,240 $ 3,421,745 $ (1,224,750) 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ $ 366.7% 0.0% N/A -26.4% Expenditure 19,554 5,530,344 $ 5,549,898 98,000 5,432,094 $ 5,530,094 69,077 $ 97,658 $ 5,547,595 5,547,468 (115,500) (115,500) $ 5,501,172 $ 5,529,626 $ 342 (115,374) 115,500 468 0.3% -2.1% N/A 0.0% Activity Narrative: Cactus League Operations Fund (250) revenues are increasing by 366.7% since the FY 2011 Revised budget did not include the $115,500 operating revenue that will be sent by the Bond Trustee to Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) and transferred to Cactus League Operations Fund (250) in accordance with the Bond Document in FY12. The revenue of $24,750 in the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) in FY 2011 Revised revenue is interest earnings. It is anticipated that Revenue from the Rental Car Tax will not increase in comparison to FY 2011. Therefore, the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) will remain out of structural balance by $925,723. The beginning fund balance in FY 2012 is sufficient to absorb the costs. 93 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year. Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year. Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year. Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year. Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year. FY 2010 ACTUAL N/A N/A FY 2011 FY 2011 REVISED FORECAST 100.0% 100.0% 95.0% FY 2012 ADOPTED 100.0% 70.8% REV VS ADOPTED VAR % 0.0% 0.0% 70.8% (24.2%) -25.4% N/A 16 16 16 - 0.0% N/A 2,264,472 2,175,539 2,264,472 - 0.0% N/A 2,264,472 2,175,138 2,264,472 - 0.0% 1.57 57.6% N/A $ 2.73 $ 2.44 $ 1.16 $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 4,340,808 $ 7,941,583 $ 7,213,483 $ 4,399,024 $ (3,542,559) 1,000,000 1,179,241 1,179,241 1,200,000 20,759 2,519,012 2,612,870 2,109,913 1,615,221 (997,649) (2,494,180) (6,284,611) (5,271,452) (864,221) 5,420,390 $ 5,365,640 $ 5,449,083 $ 5,231,185 $ 6,350,024 $ 900,941 -44.6% 1.8% -38.2% -86.2% 16.5% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 3,525,698 $ 7,786,817 $ 6,402,814 $ 3,484,976 $ 4,301,841 1,000,000 1,179,241 1,179,241 1,200,000 (20,759) 26,189 3,500,500 3,005,193 3,000 3,497,500 (2,494,180) (6,284,611) (5,271,452) (2,064,221) (4,220,390) $ 2,057,707 $ 6,181,947 $ 5,315,796 $ 2,623,755 $ 3,558,192 55.2% -1.8% 99.9% 67.2% 57.6% Expenditure Activity Narrative: The percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with the facility during the current fiscal year is decreasing by 25.4% due a change in methodology in measuring this result that was recommended by the Internal Audit Department. While the Stadium District does not have direct control to improve this measure, the District spent $3,497,500 on major maintenance projects in FY 2011. It is anticipated that that the experience of baseball fans and District Event participants while attending baseball games and other events at the Stadium will increase with the improvements to the Stadium, thereby increasing customer satisfaction. Revenue for the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is decreasing by 44.6% due to the decrease in transfers for non-recurring projects such as the Roof Replacement and the Suites Renovations projects and a decrease in Interest Earnings. Revenue for the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) is decreasing due to the decrease in the estimated 50% net revenue transfer from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253), a decrease in payment per agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks Baseball Team and a decrease in interest earnings. Expenses for the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) are decreasing by 52.2% due to a decrease in nonrecurring projects as such as the Roof Replacement and Suites Renovations project and the decrease in estimated 50% net revenue transfer of from the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). Expenses for the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) are decreasing by 99.9% due to decrease in Transfers Out for the non-recurring projects. 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Tourism and Sport Authority (AZTSA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set Stadium District Car Rental the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a Surcharge motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and Fiscal Annual Growth designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of Year Collections Rate whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The 2002-03 4,865,038 -12.1% District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at 2003-04 5,556,717 14.2% a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of 2004-05 6,024,416 8.4% Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum 2005-06 6,498,814 7.9% amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. 2006-07 6,288,093 -3.2% Licenses and Permits The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11* 2011-12** 6,132,465 5,304,567 4,668,575 4,540,274 4,321,845 -2.5% -13.5% -12.0% -14.4% -7.4% * Forecasted ** Budgeted Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources solely comprise Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds will be utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to Stadium District Debt Series 95 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District 02 Fund (370) will be made for repayments of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the revenue expected in FY 2012 will result in no net revenue being paid to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2012. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 3,314,176 $ 3,251,965 $ 3,251,965 $ 3,448,496 $ 3,526,043 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 154,744 154,744 $ $ 24,750 24,750 $ $ 24,750 24,750 $ $ 147,770 147,770 $ $ 140,250 140,250 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 20,421 20,421 $ $ 99,143 99,143 $ $ 99,143 99,143 $ $ 70,223 70,223 $ $ 99,143 99,143 Structural Balance $ 134,323 $ (74,393) $ 77,547 $ 41,107 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ (74,393) $ (3) $ 3,448,496 3,448,496 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - 3,177,572 3,177,572 $ $ 3,177,572 3,177,572 $ $ 3,526,043 3,526,043 $ $ 3,567,150 3,567,150 Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 6,989,310 $ 7,348,557 $ 7,348,557 $ 7,688,449 $ 8,349,968 $ 4,407,578 23,689 4,431,267 $ 4,444,083 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ 4,444,083 3,497,500 7,941,583 $ 4,280,937 3,002,193 7,283,130 $ 4,474,024 4,474,024 $ $ 3,621,352 3,000,259 6,621,611 $ $ 4,444,083 3,497,500 7,941,583 $ $ 4,444,083 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ $ 3,708,449 23,689 3,732,138 $ 3,721,193 3,721,193 Structural Balance $ 699,129 $ - $ - $ 659,585 $ 752,831 Accounting Adjustments $ 10 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 7,688,449 7,688,449 $ $ 7,348,557 7,348,557 $ $ 7,348,557 7,348,557 $ $ 8,349,968 8,349,968 $ $ 9,102,799 9,102,799 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ 96 $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 9,993,482 $ 9,224,780 $ 9,224,780 $ 9,468,739 $ 8,770,121 $ 6,005,607 6,005,607 $ 5,800,986 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 5,800,986 $ 6,028,218 6,028,218 $ 5,821,745 5,821,745 6,530,344 6,530,344 $ 6,611,335 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 6,611,335 $ 6,726,836 6,726,836 $ $ $ $ $ $ Structural Balance $ (524,737) $ Accounting Adjustments $ (6) $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 9,468,739 9,468,739 $ $ $ $ (810,349) $ $ $ (810,349) $ $ $ (698,618) $ 6,747,468 6,747,468 (925,723) - $ - $ - $ - 8,414,431 8,414,431 $ $ 8,414,431 8,414,431 $ $ 8,770,121 8,770,121 $ $ 7,844,398 7,844,398 Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2010 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2011 ADOPTED FY 2011 REVISED FY 2011 FORECAST FY 2012 ADOPTED $ 7,509,358 $ 9,918,465 $ 9,918,465 $ 10,002,435 $ 9,108,997 $ 2,519,143 126 2,519,269 $ 2,612,870 2,612,870 $ 2,612,870 2,612,870 $ 2,109,281 2,474 2,111,755 $ 1,615,321 1,615,321 $ $ 3,000 3,002,193 3,005,193 $ $ 3,000 3,497,500 3,500,500 $ $ 3,000 2,097,500 2,100,500 $ $ 2,500 23,689 26,189 $ 3,000 3,000 Structural Balance $ 2,516,643 $ 2,609,870 $ 2,609,870 $ 2,106,281 $ 1,612,321 Accounting Adjustments $ (3) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 10,430,835 10,430,835 $ $ 9,030,835 9,030,835 $ $ 9,108,997 9,108,997 $ $ 10,721,318 10,721,318 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ 10,002,435 10,002,435 $ $ $ 97 $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 99,143 $ 24,750 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 99,143 $ 24,750 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 99,143 $ 24,750 $ - $ - 115,500 115,500 $ 99,143 $ 0.0% 140,250 466.7% FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 4,444,083 $ 4,444,083 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 4,444,083 $ 4,444,083 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 4,444,083 $ 4,444,083 $ 503 $ (2,100) 2,603 (723,393) $ (503) (722,890) 29,941 29,941 - 3,721,193 $ -16.3% 4,474,024 0.7% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Ballpark Operations Fund (253) OPERATING Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Emp Health Dental Prem Realloc Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: $ FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 6,611,335 $ 5,800,986 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 6,611,335 $ 5,800,986 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 6,611,335 $ 5,800,986 $ 136,133 $ 20,633 115,500 20,759 20,759 - $ 6,747,468 $ 2.1% 5,821,745 0.4% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,612,870 FY 2011 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,612,870 FY 2012 Budget Target $ 3,000 $ 2,612,870 $ - $ - (997,549) (274,659) (722,890) $ 3,000 $ 0.0% 1,615,321 -38.2% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2011 Adopted Budget $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) FY 2011 Revised Budget $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) FY 2012 Budget Target $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) $ 607,390 $ (115,500) 722,890 607,390 (115,500) 722,890 $ (2,179,721) $ -21.8% (2,179,721) -21.8% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2012 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 99 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2010 Year Ending June 30 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds Stadium District contractual obligations Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities $ 50,050,000 $ 47,230,000 $ 44,270,000 $ 41,165,000 $ 37,905,000 2,428,888 0 0 0 0 0 978,394 10,864,916 10,465,338 9,286,098 $ 52,478,888 $ 48,208,394 $ 55,134,916 $ 51,630,338 $ 47,191,098 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2010 Year Ending June 30 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016–19 Total Principal 3,390,000 3,570,000 3,760,000 3,960,000 4,170,000 19,055,000 37,905,000 $ $ $ $ Total Debt Service $ 5,418,694 5,420,718 5,423,294 5,421,194 5,418,344 21,682,568 $ 48,784,812 Interest 2,028,694 1,850,718 1,663,294 1,461,194 1,248,344 2,627,568 10,879,812 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING BY ISSUE As of June 30, 2010 Bond Issue Total Stadium District Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Amount $ 37,905,000 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Interest Principal $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 101 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 $0 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: BOND RATINGS Explanation of corporate/municipal bond ratings RATING AGENCIES Fitch Moody’s Standard & Poor’s Premium quality High quality Medium quality AAA AA A Aaa Aa A AAA AA A Medium grade, lower quality Predominantly speculative Speculative, low grade BBB BB B Baa Ba B BBB BB B Poor to default Highest speculation Lowest quality, no interest CCC CC C Caa Ca C CCC CC C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DD D 102 DDD DD D Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Stadium District Revenue Bonds Fitch Moody's BBB- (1) WR (2) Standard & Poor's AAA (3) (1) Bonds are insured, underlying rating. (2) Withdrawn (3) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating Stadium District Loans Payable On January 23, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the renovation of suites at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $537,723 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over two years, ending December 2010. On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over nine years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2017. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2010 Year Ending June 30 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016-20 2021 Total 103 $ $ Principal 1,179,241 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 3,273,928 32,929 9,286,098 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Stadium District 104 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2012 Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2012 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 105 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts ESTIMATED 2011-12 LESS 2011-12 DIST. 2010-11 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT NO. DISTRICT NAME LEVY PURPOSE BUDGET 2010-11 REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv Bond Interest $ 756 $ 756 $ 540 $ - $ 540 Bond redemption 2,216 2,216 1,844 1,844 $ 2,972 $ 2,972 $ 2,384 $ - $ 2,384 K-100 Marquerite Drive Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 290 $ 3,212 3,502 $ 290 $ 3,212 3,502 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 1,606 $ 4,113 5,719 $ 1,606 $ 4,113 5,719 $ 1,037 $ 1,897 2,934 $ - $ - $ 1,037 1,897 2,934 K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 11,993 $ 24,138 36,131 $ 11,993 $ 24,138 36,131 $ 6,072 $ 14,597 20,669 $ - $ - $ 6,072 14,597 20,669 Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street General General General General 8,000 $ 100,000 10,000 8,258 Subtotal $ 126,258 $ 8,000 $ 100,000 10,000 8,258 126,258 $ 7,000 $ 100,000 10,900 7,787 125,687 $ - $ - $ 7,000 100,000 10,900 7,787 125,687 Total $ 174,582 $ 174,582 $ 151,674 $ - $ 151,674 28795 28529 28793 28835 $ 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LEVIES SECONDARY ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Tow ne Meadow s The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadow s 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadow s 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET 3,362 3,668 10,183 1,244 25,254 11,185 936 23,241 2,879 5,040 6,725 6,978 249 1,133 4,394 6,091 2,488 11,137 4,041 5,045 8,236 4,132 5,062 747 717 8,744 2,025 13,116 979 6,645 979 8,974 7,364 11,232 16,123 1,611 2,203 13,889 3,732 32,338 2,327 3,982 4,348 30,255 1,244 1,464 3,571 3,895 11,342 1,395 8,345 12,492 1,036 23,382 3,212 5,580 7,497 7,336 279 1,269 4,916 6,802 2,790 11,782 4,521 5,473 7,605 3,843 5,658 837 797 9,773 2,154 14,660 1,098 7,402 1,098 10,031 8,230 12,536 17,928 1,800 2,471 14,743 4,185 33,860 2,599 4,439 4,862 32,110 1,395 1,634 108 Estimated TAX LEVY 600 3,000 13,311 1,671 787 15,202 1,248 28,657 3,357 5,412 7,635 7,962 362 1,524 5,911 8,272 2,670 12,416 4,820 6,286 8,102 3,659 6,023 902 1,054 10,328 2,581 15,775 1,099 7,999 1,385 10,400 8,934 13,098 18,984 1,849 2,942 16,678 4,107 35,064 2,713 4,408 5,817 34,157 1,570 1,918 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 807,174 0.0743 1,081,460 0.2774 1,849,032 0.7199 243,910 0.6851 7,867,037 0.0100 2,032,655 0.7479 383,730 0.3252 1,776,396 1.6132 849,914 0.3950 3,343,405 0.1619 893,455 0.8545 1,728,840 0.4605 1,903,330 0.0190 550,650 0.2768 1,720,220 0.3436 1,828,962 0.4523 595,836 0.4481 3,086,576 0.4023 1,176,312 0.4098 786,090 0.7997 1,474,491 0.5495 579,603 0.6313 3,899,506 0.1545 645,862 0.1397 260,370 0.4048 3,920,259 0.2635 200,496 1.2873 5,927,130 0.2661 352,402 0.3119 2,781,656 0.2876 156,100 0.8873 3,116,686 0.3337 2,546,276 0.3509 3,722,255 0.3519 4,438,956 0.4277 1,331,112 0.1389 288,981 1.0181 1,994,644 0.8361 990,092 0.4148 4,732,339 0.7409 589,586 0.4602 764,701 0.5764 738,424 0.7878 3,922,072 0.8709 257,790 0.6090 279,950 0.6851 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET 6,903 4,727 968,229 12,886 2,488 2,863 221 3,234 23,992 2,569 6,187 4,651 18,942 12,649 2,986 2,278 3,813 1,958 27,559 3,603 24,413 29,894 2,986 4,976 3,662 2,937 7,365 14,442 11,753 22,071 8,269 6,024 18,766 17,525 11,781 167,825 5,998 14,262 41,818 25,644 25,967 2,487 5,974 30,449 3,182 12,360 3,671 3,672 37,261 4,651 3,361 7,716 5,019 1,025,362 14,403 2,790 3,069 240 3,627 25,350 2,853 6,840 5,216 20,102 13,424 3,347 2,535 4,175 2,196 29,243 3,824 27,324 31,727 3,347 5,580 3,888 3,294 8,256 16,195 13,158 23,427 9,252 6,396 19,916 18,599 12,504 177,996 6,306 15,145 44,382 27,217 27,560 2,811 6,341 32,314 780 13,120 1,138 4,118 39,541 5,216 3,568 109 Estimated TAX LEVY 8,273 5,337 1,101,842 15,393 3,213 3,364 23 3,404 27,009 3,341 8,050 6,265 21,845 14,845 4,052 2,647 4,889 2,757 32,756 4,032 26,038 34,420 3,602 6,157 3,733 3,245 8,659 17,128 13,909 27,884 11,298 6,951 21,828 19,437 13,529 184,414 7,034 16,118 46,709 29,200 28,841 3,495 6,484 33,564 221 14,031 91 4,275 42,778 5,276 3,845 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 2,740,698 0.3019 434,308 1.2289 228,349,365 0.4825 3,741,134 0.4115 282,642 1.1368 703,656 0.4781 228,002 0.0101 1,053,113 0.3232 3,073,663 0.8787 231,347 1.4442 597,950 1.3463 584,874 1.0712 2,751,350 0.7940 2,059,332 0.7209 427,030 0.9489 207,384 1.2764 787,744 0.6206 455,810 0.6049 3,646,537 0.8983 348,762 1.1561 3,364,720 0.7739 4,311,788 0.7983 729,598 0.4937 874,135 0.7044 339,690 1.0989 570,826 0.5685 2,814,355 0.3077 3,488,501 0.4910 3,324,422 0.4184 4,131,285 0.6749 1,140,018 0.9910 773,349 0.8988 2,690,789 0.8112 2,893,605 0.6717 1,900,946 0.7117 38,649,232 0.4771 1,145,250 0.6142 2,033,771 0.7925 8,119,225 0.5753 4,590,983 0.6360 3,985,349 0.7237 469,870 0.7438 970,006 0.6684 4,492,768 0.7471 2,210,803 0.0100 2,382,791 0.5888 905,556 0.0100 417,113 1.0249 5,333,791 0.8020 759,171 0.6950 659,659 0.5829 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 DESCRIPTION Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentw ood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET 1,224 1,713 4,478 4,859 7,344 7,778 1,042 5,163 25,513 24,069 7,808 1,958 17,442 4,976 1,244 7,531 1,990 12,483 3,888 3,821 3,356 11,211 2,034 8,368 11,873 3,672 25,454 34,557 13,647 8,010 1,958 5,225 21,650 11,649 26,540 3,917 4,251 5,220 2,237 7,116 15,272 2,486 6,463 7,500 1,989 8,203 3,483 13,239 1,989 2,224 4,723 1,372 1,922 5,043 5,160 8,235 8,695 1,165 5,478 27,079 25,542 8,288 2,196 19,370 5,580 1,395 8,484 2,232 13,996 4,353 4,252 3,752 11,255 2,274 9,357 13,304 1,138 27,010 36,669 14,488 8,504 607 5,858 22,976 12,369 28,166 4,157 4,764 1,595 684 2,203 4,681 760 1,975 2,321 608 2,507 3,906 4,089 608 2,491 1,443 110 Estimated TAX LEVY 1,507 2,018 5,908 6,171 8,533 9,210 1,390 5,907 28,856 27,070 10,131 2,185 18,752 6,104 1,396 10,090 2,607 14,931 4,848 4,977 4,169 11,659 2,331 11,146 13,965 85 31,444 40,131 17,598 9,215 34 7,063 27,410 13,464 29,748 4,568 5,438 205 110 208 557 100 240 242 489 383 4,535 556 84 2,640 216 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 285,160 0.5285 210,930 0.9567 623,359 0.9478 755,744 0.8165 1,740,844 0.4902 1,755,410 0.5247 208,550 0.6665 926,746 0.6374 3,742,056 0.7711 3,704,639 0.7307 3,609,881 0.2806 358,216 0.6100 5,305,490 0.3534 1,666,794 0.3662 266,162 0.5245 679,118 1.4858 293,470 0.8883 2,208,163 0.6762 712,654 0.6803 583,907 0.8524 582,299 0.7160 1,288,820 0.9046 531,473 0.4386 1,801,540 0.6187 2,440,072 0.5723 847,240 0.0100 4,122,275 0.7628 4,744,581 0.8458 3,740,213 0.4705 1,956,379 0.4710 336,490 0.0101 1,222,533 0.5777 3,844,998 0.7129 1,610,604 0.8360 3,409,282 0.8726 443,952 1.0289 1,438,688 0.3780 2,053,169 0.0100 1,098,400 0.0100 2,076,118 0.0100 5,566,883 0.0100 999,080 0.0100 2,403,224 0.0100 2,421,446 0.0100 4,891,010 0.0100 3,834,172 0.0100 751,752 0.6033 5,563,701 0.0100 841,276 0.0100 344,912 0.7654 2,158,634 0.0100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 DESCRIPTION Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Tow n & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Merew ay Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET 4,474 12,472 3,182 6,469 13,672 13,813 8,949 5,717 11,435 2,447 6,004 2,642 8,097 1,555 2,486 7,706 3,139 1,898 2,266 33,061 19,726 13,921 9,204 7,749 6,463 2,237 1,492 5,469 7,496 1,989 1,469 13,929 5,070 2,203 2,497 43,135 19,097 7,833 5,519 3,153 35,373 30,768 15,178 13,776 16,805 13,511 2,448 7,737 54,747 41,824 4,894 1,367 3,840 3,569 7,253 4,178 4,378 2,734 1,747 3,494 2,745 6,588 835 8,946 503 760 2,355 988 2,127 2,538 10,103 6,184 4,254 10,322 2,397 1,975 684 456 1,671 7,961 608 1,647 15,623 5,624 2,471 2,745 45,781 20,269 8,784 6,069 3,529 37,542 32,656 16,109 14,619 17,835 14,338 2,745 8,509 58,113 44,397 5,196 111 Estimated TAX LEVY 174 375 3,652 8,770 462 487 405 176 471 3,128 6,925 88 11,121 65 110 227 119 2,451 2,540 1,218 731 1,048 11,456 322 149 63 54 216 8,387 59 1,721 17,540 5,941 2,460 2,917 50,416 23,058 9,422 6,342 4,134 42,097 34,971 17,185 16,345 19,754 15,682 2,789 8,775 64,065 49,130 5,472 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 1,737,440 0.0100 3,750,406 0.0100 1,186,587 0.3078 860,052 1.0197 4,618,302 0.0100 4,868,541 0.0100 4,049,209 0.0100 1,763,126 0.0100 4,705,200 0.0100 392,720 0.7965 902,322 0.7675 880,777 0.0100 2,227,037 0.4994 649,800 0.0100 1,103,270 0.0100 2,268,538 0.0100 1,188,229 0.0100 235,773 1.0396 467,200 0.5437 12,178,387 0.0100 7,313,314 0.0100 10,484,454 0.0100 2,557,221 0.4480 3,217,049 0.0100 1,486,854 0.0100 633,810 0.0099 540,500 0.0100 2,155,144 0.0100 1,093,376 0.7671 589,320 0.0100 223,354 0.7705 3,681,925 0.4764 1,159,766 0.5123 278,150 0.8844 557,134 0.5236 5,933,690 0.8497 2,997,614 0.7692 1,355,683 0.6950 1,059,837 0.5984 317,080 1.3038 5,207,770 0.8083 4,270,038 0.8190 2,198,274 0.7817 2,083,657 0.7844 2,660,451 0.7425 1,512,802 1.0366 500,894 0.5568 1,290,028 0.6802 7,200,648 0.8897 4,629,865 1.0612 686,494 0.7971 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 DESCRIPTION Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadow s 10 Litchfield Vista View s II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigw am Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET 5,323 378,646 4,749 7,794 6,738 42,214 2,948 10,590 47,590 10,278 26,893 42,905 8,562 14,559 15,493 38,038 3,268 4,406 7,215 11,792 49,891 26,788 13,610 50,150 24,453 9,952 16,671 7,464 3,234 10,463 24,626 21,038 19,429 3,916 9,971 4,426 20,034 10,770 6,816 3,515 16,887 2,556 8,935 777,934 1,365 7,254 98,404 50,046 1,713 15,192 23,239 5,652 399,453 5,322 7,961 7,154 44,908 3,129 11,242 50,509 11,529 28,543 45,532 9,608 15,451 16,445 40,054 3,652 4,941 7,659 12,515 52,951 28,430 14,442 53,222 23,969 11,438 18,691 8,369 3,627 11,105 26,130 22,326 20,616 1,214 10,586 4,697 21,257 12,119 7,233 3,732 17,930 2,714 9,492 760,681 1,487 7,719 104,486 53,197 1,922 16,161 24,715 112 Estimated TAX LEVY 6,164 458,523 5,187 8,376 7,999 47,506 3,344 12,112 53,891 11,953 30,763 48,662 9,908 17,190 20,655 42,214 3,356 5,409 8,401 15,394 56,155 30,545 15,614 57,385 29,688 11,923 19,465 8,117 3,537 11,940 27,871 24,011 21,427 138 13,017 5,309 23,027 12,903 7,985 4,518 23,129 3,268 10,660 908,585 1,701 9,783 112,226 68,258 2,075 19,866 30,888 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 647,846 0.9515 34,772,730 1.3186 724,208 0.7162 1,220,664 0.6862 1,135,051 0.7047 5,972,368 0.7954 413,262 0.8092 1,463,920 0.8274 6,386,948 0.8438 1,707,672 0.7000 2,981,533 1.0318 5,574,001 0.8730 1,375,932 0.7201 1,466,106 1.1725 3,586,526 0.5759 3,652,692 1.1557 657,847 0.5101 570,862 0.9475 1,199,020 0.7007 2,848,901 0.5403 7,577,041 0.7411 4,070,198 0.7505 2,123,104 0.7354 6,700,836 0.8564 9,226,200 0.3218 3,186,655 0.3742 3,265,988 0.5960 2,804,599 0.2894 1,054,100 0.3355 1,994,992 0.5985 4,115,723 0.6772 2,488,174 0.9650 2,746,202 0.7802 1,375,128 0.0100 2,796,573 0.4655 706,439 0.7515 2,678,106 0.8598 2,022,292 0.6380 1,671,618 0.4777 1,313,750 0.3439 2,305,590 1.0032 1,129,570 0.2893 1,125,942 0.9468 113,770,854 0.7986 460,604 0.3693 2,355,170 0.4154 21,848,959 0.5136 14,459,120 0.4721 844,436 0.2457 3,590,196 0.5533 8,502,005 0.3633 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2012 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) 2010-11 BUDGET DIST # 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 23578 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 DESCRIPTION Russell Ranch PH 1 Wigw am Creek South Litchfield Vista View s IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigw am Creek N 2&2b Coldw ater Ranch Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero 13435 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 23104 Litchfield Vista View s Estimated 2011-12 BUDGET Estimated TAX LEVY 4,328 53,008 1,310 4,645 29,171 5,716 32,557 9,521 76,292 16,227 3,784 49,773 4,163 667 4,600 56,322 1,394 4,940 31,036 6,082 34,630 10,129 80,905 17,260 4,198 21,019 4,428 709 5,412 70,829 1,631 6,098 41,218 7,413 42,310 12,471 93,905 21,806 4,997 8,145 5,921 868 5,331,866 5,360,496 5,863,514 2,448 2,280 2,745 2,418 113 2,938 2,910 TAX YEAR Estimated 2011 2011 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 3,307,882 0.1636 19,554,552 0.3622 1,735,287 0.0940 5,037,411 0.1211 8,817,560 0.4675 1,807,760 0.4101 8,596,994 0.4921 1,351,778 0.9226 20,982,025 0.4475 14,273,441 0.1528 5,050,701 0.0989 3,838,825 0.2122 3,620,962 0.1635 1,046,090 0.0830 2011 SQUARE FOOTAGE 313,262 1,369,683 0.9379 0.2125