FY 2010-11 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Adopted Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Motion Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levy Limit Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Other Intergovernmental Revenue Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers In Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Estimating Fund Balances Fund Balance Summary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Managing for Results (MRF) for All Projects 1 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 16 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 20 23 24 24 Library District Motion Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures by Department Fund and Function Class Sources and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program and Activity 77 79 82 83 84 85 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund Transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing By Market Range Title Staffing by Fund Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes Levi Limit Intergovernmental Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Intergovernmental Charges for Service Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenue Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program Summary Project Detail Table of Contents 86 87 88 88 89 89 90 91 92 93 93 94 94 94 94 97 101 101 Stadium District Motion Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class Source and Uses of Funds Sources and Uses by Program Activity Sources and Uses by Category Sources and Uses by Fund and Function Fund transfers In Fund Transfers Out Staffing by Program and Activity Staffing by Market Range Title Staffing by Fund General Adjustments Strategic Business Plan Update Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax License and Permits Other Charges for Service Miscellaneous Revenue Other Financing Sources Fund Transfers Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service 105 107 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 118 118 118 118 122 122 122 122 122 122 123 125 129 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Improvement Districts Special Districts Motion Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies 133 135 136 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Motion Approve the Flood Control District FY 2011 Budget in the amount of $97,952,086 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Flood Control District. This amount represents no net change from the Tentative Adopted budget of $97,952,086. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-3620 certify to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors this Budget as adopted, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Flood Control District’s FY 2011 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Don Stapley, Chairman, District 2 Fulton Brock, District 1 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Recommended FY 2010-11 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $97,952,086. Budgeted capital project expenditures are budgeted at $60,548,481 in Fiscal Year 2010-11, a $548,481 increase from Fiscal Year 2009-10. The budget continues to provide for a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. The decrease in the levy is less than the Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures FY 2009 Through FY 2011 decrease of property values. So while $62,000,000 the levy is reduced in FY 2010-11 the $60,548,481 Flood Control District tax rate will $61,000,000 $60,000,000 increase from $0.1367 to $0.1485. The $59,000,000 District was directed by the Board of $58,000,000 Directors to implement a cap of 2% on its $57,000,000 tax levy growth, excluding new $56,000,000 $55,213,186 $54,265,707 construction, in order to protect taxpayers $55,000,000 $54,000,000 from tax increases due to increases in $53,000,000 assessed property values. The District $52,000,000 itself placed a cap on the FY 2010-11 $51,000,000 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 levy at $68,000,000. This results in a Actual Forecast Adopted property tax revenue budget of $67,353,206 which is a decrease of $6,893,630 from FY 2009-10. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) revenue totals to $4,908,000 for cost-sharing with cities and towns on capital projects. In FY 2010-11, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $70.6 million, which is $6.9 million (8.9%) less than in Fiscal Year 2009-10. The Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $1.55 million for the Floodprone Property Acquisition Program. In all, the Flood Control District has 31 scheduled projects totaling $300,548,481 in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager Note: No changes from Recommended Budget 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Mary Driessen, Management & Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is to provide flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation, and education to the people in Maricopa County so that they can reduce their risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding while enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The vision of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is that the people of Maricopa County and future generations will have the maximum amount of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multiple-use facilities that complement or enhance the beauty of our desert environment. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL ELIMINATIONS $ 46,405,987 $ 24,075,924 $ 70,481,911 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 67,353,206 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 633,600 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 155,691 INTEREST EARNINGS 800,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,638,789 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 70,581,286 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ - $ 67,353,206 $ 633,600 155,691 800,000 1,638,789 - $ 70,581,286 $ TOTAL - $ 70,481,911 - $ 67,353,206 633,600 155,691 800,000 1,638,789 $ 70,581,286 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ 4,908,000 4,908,000 882,219 882,219 40,000,000 40,000,000 (40,000,000) 1,682,219 $ 44,908,000 $ 46,590,219 $ (40,000,000) $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 72,263,505 $ 44,908,000 $ 117,171,505 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 15,523,051 $ SUPPLIES 1,906,952 SERVICES 17,297,581 CAPITAL 1,876,021 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 36,603,605 $ 800,000 4,908,000 882,219 6,590,219 $ (40,000,000) $ 77,171,505 - $ 15,523,051 $ 1,906,952 17,297,581 1,876,021 - $ 36,603,605 $ - $ 15,523,051 1,906,952 17,297,581 1,876,021 $ 36,603,605 NON-RECURRING PERSONAL SERVICES $ - $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ - $ 2,600,000 SERVICES 800,000 800,000 800,000 CAPITAL 57,948,481 57,948,481 57,948,481 OTHER FINANCING USES 40,000,000 40,000,000 (40,000,000) TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 40,800,000 $ 60,548,481 $ 101,348,481 $ (40,000,000) $ 61,348,481 TOTAL USES $ 77,403,605 $ 60,548,481 $ 137,952,086 STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 33,977,681 $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 41,265,887 $ 6 $ (40,000,000) $ 97,952,086 - $ 33,977,681 $ 8,435,443 $ 49,701,330 $ - $ 33,977,681 - $ 49,701,330 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2010 ADOPTED 690 991 989 990 900 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS APS ES ESCO IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CHANDLER PHOENIX DAM SAFETY PROGRAM CITY OF SCOTTSDALE TOWN OF QUEEN CREEK SOSSAMAN CHANNEL AGUA FRIA RIVER S PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT ARIZ CANAL DIVERSION CHANNEL EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY SALT GILA RIVER WHITE TANKS DAM #4 MCMICKEN DAM BUCKEYE NO 1 BUCKEYE SUN VALLEY ADMP GRANITE REEF WASH SPOOK HILL FRS POWERLINE FRS SADDLEBACK FLOOD REMED STRUCT WICKENBURG ADMS HASSAYAMPA RIVER CAVE BUTTES DAM SKUNK CREEK NEW RIVER SPOOK HILL ADMP EAST MESA ADMP GLENDALE PEORIA ADMP WHITE TANKS ADMP QUEEN CREEK ADMP HIGLEY ADMP DURANGO ADMP SCATTER WASH CHANNEL MARYVALE ADMP METRO ADMP MAINT ROAD PAVING PROJECT SMALL PROJECT ASSISTANCE FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION PROJECT RESERVES FLOOD All Functions ELIMINATIONS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT $ $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 77,357,694 $ $ $ FY 2010 REVISED $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 77,357,694 - $ 800,000 $ 5,000 5,000 105,000 1,945,000 495,000 748,000 1,200,000 5,989,000 1,346,000 1,173,000 10,000 842,000 408,000 346,000 1,269,000 260,000 92,000 44,000 412,000 72,000 3,340,000 4,587,000 3,590,000 12,130,000 5,199,000 5,000 5,362,000 10,000 6,172,000 1,442,000 500,000 874,000 23,000 60,000,000 $ 105,000 5,000 315,000 40,000 30,000 635,000 560,000 5,640,000 55,000 1,088,000 10,000 1,480,000 162,000 100,000 1,340,000 10,000 25,000 345,000 560,000 2,693,000 5,825,000 5,325,000 17,540,000 4,323,000 10,000 2,524,000 5,000 2,518,000 2,297,000 1,565,000 2,870,000 60,000,000 $ FY 2011 ADOPTED $ $ (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 36,603,605 40,000,000 $ 76,603,605 $ $ 126,706 627,383 754,089 800,000 $ - 548,481 5,000 3,550,000 55,000 10,000 5,000 380,000 333,000 45,000 10,000 3,367,000 10,000 520,000 25,000 1,060,000 40,000 3,198,000 330,000 15,000 263,000 210,000 100,000 979,000 15,909,000 8,358,000 905,000 7,400,000 5,745,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 2,623,000 $ 60,548,481 $ (548,481) 5,000 (3,445,000) 1,890,000 485,000 (5,000) 368,000 867,000 5,944,000 1,336,000 (2,194,000) 322,000 383,000 (1,060,000) 306,000 (1,929,000) (70,000) 77,000 44,000 149,000 72,000 3,130,000 4,487,000 2,611,000 (3,779,000) (3,159,000) 5,000 4,457,000 10,000 (1,228,000) (4,303,000) (500,000) (2,000,000) (676,000) (2,600,000) $ (548,481) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,000,000) $ TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ 96,730,311 7 $ 97,530,311 $ 97,952,086 $ (627,383) (421,775) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $97,952,086 Fund Balance $20,780,581 21% Licenses and Permits $633,600 1% Miscellaneous & Interest $3,321,008 3% Intergovernmental & Grants $5,863,691 6% Property Taxes $67,353,206 69% Uses of Funds $97,952,086 Administrative Services $8,270,853 8% Information Technology $3,123,320 3% Flood Hazard Regulation $2,567,368 3% Flood Hazard Remediation $71,407,200 73% Flood Hazard Outreach $2,604,284 3% Flood Hazard Identification $9,979,062 10% 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2009 ACTUAL ACTIVITY / PROGRAM FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2010-11 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % SOURCES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ $ $ 347,073 347,073 FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ $ FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ DAMS - DAM SAFETY HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ $ $ $ $ $ 12,000 174,000 186,000 - $ $ 42,100 42,100 $ $ 42,100 42,100 54 51,729 51,783 $ - $ 600,000 600,000 $ $ $ 17,988 $ 56,599,190 56,893 56,674,071 $ 3,272,000 $ 10,319,000 13,591,000 $ - $ 5,694,735 5,694,735 $ 12,000 $ 174,000 186,000 $ $ 15,000 210,000 225,000 3,000 36,000 39,000 25.0% 20.7% 21.0% 13,952 13,952 $ $ 35,900 35,900 (6,200) (6,200) -14.7% -14.7% $ $ 700,110 700,110 800,000 800,000 3,272,000 $ 10,519,000 13,791,000 $ 3,843,747 10,494,336 6,200 14,344,283 $ 323,816 2,455,843 2,779,659 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 33.3% $ 211,000 1,892,308 2,103,308 211,000 (3,802,427) (3,591,427) -66.8% -63.1% 68,308,897 68,308,897 (7,032,188) (7,032,188) -9.3% -9.3% $ $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 29,472,156 29,472,156 $ $ 75,341,085 75,341,085 $ $ 75,341,085 $ 75,341,085 $ 75,341,085 $ 75,341,085 $ GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 722,616 722,616 $ $ 689,554 689,554 $ $ 689,554 689,554 689,554 689,554 TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 117,338,553 FY 2008-09 ACTUAL $ 95,544,474 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ $ $ 33.3% (3,272,000) (5,611,000) (8,883,000) 12,454 $ 30,058,400 30,070,854 $ $ 200,000 200,000 4,908,000 4,908,000 ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ACTIVITY / PROGRAM 5,694,735 5,694,735 145,980 145,980 $ $ 790,400 790,400 100,846 100,846 -100.0% -53.3% -64.4% 14.6% 14.6% 96,344,474 $ 94,014,623 $ 77,171,505 $ (19,172,969) -19.9% FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 ADOPTED VS REVISED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED VARIANCE % USES FCMP - FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION $ 589,672 $ 1,445,978 2,035,650 $ 780,092 $ 1,539,268 2,319,360 $ 780,092 1,539,268 2,319,360 $ EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH $ 324,247 379,231 940,944 626,602 2,271,024 220,263 382,109 1,180,372 729,688 2,512,432 220,263 382,109 1,180,372 729,688 2,512,432 $ FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ 2,509,389 $ 5,620,369 8,129,758 $ $ $ DAMS - DAM SAFETY FMLT - FLOOD MULTI PURP ENHANCEMENTS HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION $ BDGT - BUDGETING FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PROC - PROCUREMENT RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ $ $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 6,172,505 2,018,515 96,041,361 5,461,890 109,694,271 $ $ $ 2,865,350 $ 7,036,932 9,902,282 $ 17,057,965 48,878,399 6,462,379 72,398,743 $ 764,408 $ 1,448,598 2,213,006 $ 715,802 1,851,565 2,567,367 (64,290) 312,297 248,007 -8.2% 20.3% 10.7% 239,414 459,038 1,175,370 719,178 2,593,000 $ 251,452 388,063 1,190,275 774,503 2,604,293 31,189 5,954 9,903 44,815 91,861 14.2% 1.6% 0.8% 6.1% 3.7% 3,465,350 $ 7,036,932 10,502,282 $ 3,483,531 $ 6,687,005 10,170,536 $ 3,017,844 6,961,221 9,979,065 (447,506) (75,711) (523,217) -12.9% -1.1% -5.0% 16,106,965 $ 50,029,399 6,462,379 72,598,743 10,366,441 51,139,544 6,693,296 68,199,281 15,051,492 49,815,210 6,540,501 71,407,203 (1,055,473) (214,189) 78,122 (1,191,540) -6.6% 93,191 $ 544,658 341,731 195,204 1,278,442 327,426 62,294 911,502 3,754,448 $ 135,335 1,643,347 347,612 236,868 1,675,370 350,453 68,500 984,930 5,442,415 22,410 1,070,692 44,808 47,814 378,404 28,205 18,752 183,436 1,794,521 1,306,869 $ 1,558,821 2,865,690 $ 1,419,286 1,409,137 2,828,423 112,417 (389,806) (277,389) -21.7% -8.9% 483,486 $ 310,801 592,505 1,691,535 34,313 3,112,640 $ 508,972 373,403 457,058 1,748,081 35,806 3,123,320 25,486 62,602 87,554 102,397 1,493 279,532 5.3% 20.1% 23.7% 6.2% 4.4% 9.8% 421,775 0.4% $ 113,739 $ 1,049,571 305,140 173,374 1,134,437 374,846 18,121 786,074 3,955,302 $ 112,925 $ 572,655 302,804 189,054 1,296,966 322,248 49,748 801,494 3,647,894 $ 112,925 572,655 302,804 189,054 1,296,966 322,248 49,748 801,494 3,647,894 $ 1,232,332 $ (44,709,458) 2,111,839 (41,365,287) $ 1,306,869 $ 1,798,943 3,105,812 $ 1,306,869 1,798,943 3,105,812 $ 439,204 $ 199,675 518,478 1,622,738 33,344 2,813,439 $ 483,486 $ 310,801 369,504 1,645,684 34,313 2,843,788 $ 483,486 310,801 369,504 1,645,684 34,313 2,843,788 87,534,157 $ 96,730,311 9 $ $ $ $ $ 97,530,311 $ 92,908,601 $ $ 97,952,086 $ -0.4% 1.2% -1.6% 19.8% 187.0% 14.8% 25.3% 29.2% 8.8% 37.7% 22.9% 49.2% 8.6% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2009 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED 72,672,487 72,672,487 $ $ 74,246,836 74,246,836 $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 4,311,552 4,311,552 $ $ 1,133,600 1,133,600 $ $ 1,133,600 $ 1,133,600 $ 782,092 $ 782,092 $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 11,941,054 132,102 12,073,156 $ $ - $ 13,591,000 144,249 13,735,249 $ 800,000 $ 13,591,000 144,249 14,535,249 $ 700,000 $ 14,338,083 144,249 15,182,332 $ 1,377,432 $ 26,903,926 28,281,358 $ 950,000 $ 5,478,789 6,428,789 $ 950,000 $ 5,478,789 6,428,789 $ 950,000 $ 2,853,363 3,803,363 $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 74,246,836 74,246,836 REV VS ADPT VAR % FY 2011 ADOPTED $ SUBTOTAL $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS 74,246,836 74,246,836 FY 2010 FORECAST $ $ 67,353,206 67,353,206 $ $ (6,893,630) (6,893,630) -9.3% -9.3% 633,600 $ 633,600 $ (500,000) (500,000) -44.1% -44.1% $ (8,683,000) 11,442 (8,671,558) 0.0% -63.9% 7.9% -59.7% 800,000 $ 2,521,008 3,321,008 $ (150,000) (2,957,781) (3,107,781) -15.8% -54.0% -48.3% -19.9% 800,000 4,908,000 155,691 5,863,691 $ ALL REVENUES $ 117,338,553 $ 95,544,474 $ 96,344,474 $ 94,014,623 $ 77,171,505 $ (19,172,969) TOTAL SOURCES $ 117,338,553 FY 2009 ACTUAL $ 95,544,474 FY 2010 ADOPTED $ 96,344,474 FY 2010 REVISED $ 94,014,623 FY 2010 FORECAST $ 77,171,505 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ (19,172,969) -19.9% REV VS ADPT VAR % CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 2,113,743 $ 741 625,009 67 14,398,576 17,138,136 $ 653,161 $ 163,851 16,739,517 17,556,529 $ 653,161 $ 163,851 16,714,517 17,531,529 $ 1,827,064 $ 65 492,603 (4) 15,436,870 17,756,598 $ 754,133 $ 221,888 17,147,030 18,123,051 $ (100,972) (58,037) (432,513) (591,522) -15.5% N/A N/A -35.4% N/A -2.6% -3.4% (328) $ 1,412,845 1,412,517 $ - $ 2,193,972 2,193,972 $ - $ 2,193,972 2,193,972 $ - $ 2,028,741 2,028,741 $ - $ 1,906,952 1,906,952 $ 287,020 287,020 N/A 13.1% 13.1% - $ 251,557 (2) 15,523,746 15,775,301 $ - $ 194,449 17,609,415 17,803,864 $ 800,000 $ 194,449 17,609,415 18,603,864 $ 700,045 $ 194,449 16,771,878 17,666,372 $ 800,000 $ 117,745 17,179,836 18,097,581 $ 76,704 429,579 506,283 0.0% 39.4% N/A 2.4% 2.7% $ 4,845,684 $ (22,665) 513,276 323,430 47,212,333 336,145 53,208,203 $ 13,624,000 $ 44,176,000 1,375,946 59,175,946 $ 8,192,000 $ 49,633,000 1,375,946 59,200,946 $ 16,041,454 $ 6,089 38,471,801 937,546 55,456,890 $ 4,518,000 $ 548,481 52,882,000 1,876,021 59,824,502 $ 3,674,000 (548,481) (3,249,000) (500,075) (623,556) 44.8% N/A N/A N/A -6.5% -36.3% -1.1% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 87,534,157 $ 96,730,311 $ 97,530,311 $ 92,908,601 $ 97,952,086 $ (421,775) -0.4% TOTAL USES $ 87,534,157 $ 96,730,311 $ 97,530,311 $ 92,908,601 $ 97,952,086 $ (421,775) -0.4% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0910 - LAND 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 10 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING FY 2009 ACTUAL $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV VS ADPT VAR % (44,709,458) $ (44,709,458) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ 627,383 627,383 -1.5% -1.5% - $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING $ - $ NON-RECURRING 56,598,783 56,598,783 $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING $ 105,449,258 $ NON-RECURRING (30) FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 105,449,228 $ - $ 800,000 800,000 $ 700,000 700,000 $ 800,000 800,000 $ - 0.0% 0.0% - $ 54,218,383 54,218,383 $ 54,218,383 54,218,383 $ $ 54,965,466 54,965,466 $ - $ 44,908,000 44,908,000 $ (9,310,383) (9,310,383) N/A -17.2% -17.2% 77,453,474 $ 4,500,000 81,953,474 $ 77,453,474 $ 4,500,000 81,953,474 $ 78,975,340 $ 1,200 78,976,540 $ 70,581,286 $ 882,219 71,463,505 $ (6,872,188) (3,617,781) (10,489,969) -8.9% -80.4% -12.8% 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON-RECURRING DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ 105,449,258 11,889,295 DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 117,338,553 FY 2009 FUND / FUNCTION CLASS ACTUAL 900 ELIMINATIONS NON-RECURRING $ (44,709,458) FUND TOTAL USES $ (44,709,458) 989 FLOOD CONTROL GRANTS NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON-RECURRING $ 54,265,707 54,265,707 FUND TOTAL USES $ 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING $ 33,268,450 NON-RECURRING 44,709,458 77,977,908 FUND TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ $ $ $ 77,453,474 $ 77,453,474 $ 78,975,340 $ 70,581,286 $ 18,091,000 $ 18,891,000 $ 15,039,283 $ 6,590,219 $ 95,544,474 $ 96,344,474 $ 94,014,623 $ 77,171,505 $ FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED (6,872,188) -8.9% (12,300,781) -65.1% (19,172,969) -19.9% REV VS ADPT VAR % $ $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,000,000) $ (40,000,000) $ (627,383) (627,383) 1.5% 1.5% $ - $ 800,000 800,000 $ 700,000 700,000 $ 800,000 800,000 $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 57,173,300 $ 57,173,300 $ 60,548,481 $ 60,548,481 $ (548,481) (548,481) -0.9% -0.9% $ $ 36,730,311 $ 40,627,383 77,357,694 $ 36,730,311 $ 40,627,383 77,357,694 $ 35,035,301 $ 40,627,383 75,662,684 $ 36,603,605 $ 40,000,000 76,603,605 $ 126,706 627,383 754,089 0.3% 1.5% 1.0% 33,268,450 $ 54,265,707 $ 87,534,157 $ 36,730,311 $ 60,000,000 $ 96,730,311 $ 36,730,311 $ 60,800,000 $ 97,530,311 $ 35,035,301 $ 57,873,300 $ 92,908,601 $ 36,603,605 $ 61,348,481 $ 97,952,086 $ 126,706 (548,481) (421,775) 0.3% -0.9% -0.4% 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfer In SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - IN FY 2010 ADOPTED Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED CAPITAL PROJECTS 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECT Non-Recurring Flood Control (991) $ $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,000,000 40,000,000 40,000,000 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Non-Recurring $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 40,000,000 40,000,000 ELIMINATIONS Non-Recurring $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) (40,000,000) (40,000,000) ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund Transfer Out SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - OUT Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED SPECIAL REVENUE 991 FLOOD CONTROL Non-Recurring $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,000,000 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,000,000 40,627,383 40,627,383 40,627,383 40,000,000 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,627,383 $ 40,000,000 40,627,383 40,627,383 40,627,383 40,000,000 Flood Control Capital Project (990) TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS $ Non-Recurring ELIMINATIONS $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,627,383) $ (40,000,000) Non-Recurring $ (40,627,383) (40,627,383) (40,627,383) (40,000,000) ALL FUNDS $ - $ 12 - $ - $ - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM/ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 3.00 0.60 4.00 0.40 3.00 0.60 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% 50.00% 0.00% 33.33% 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 .00 .00 .00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 .00 .00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 .00 .00 .00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 8.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 8.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.29% VARIANCE REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Administrator Attorney - Senior Counsel Director - Flood Control Dist Engineering Manager Financial Supervisor - Dept Operations Manager Operations/Program Manager DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 FY 2010 REVISED 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 FY 2010 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 FY 2011 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 0.00% 1.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (1.00) -100.00% 1.00 1.00 14.29% Staffing by Fund FUND 991 - FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED 7.00 7.00 FY 2010 REVISED 7.00 7.00 13 FY 2010 FORECAST 8.00 8.00 FY 2011 ADOPTED 8.00 8.00 REVISED TO ADOPTED VARIANCE VAR % 1.00 14.29% 1.00 14.29% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Fiscal Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional Year limitation on growth in District 2001-02 secondary property taxes. However, 2002-03 the Flood Control District Board of 2003-04 Directors has chosen to impose 2004-05 growth limitations similar to those 2005-06 imposed on the County primary levy 2006-07 in order to minimize the burden on 2007-08 taxpayers. As a result, beginning in 2008-09 FY 2006-07 the secondary levy 2009-10 associated with the Flood Control 2010-11 District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year. Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 19,544,069 21,174,169 24,140,629 26,585,248 29,605,196 32,778,027 45,937,945 54,751,263 54,862,329 45,681,391 Tax Rate Tax (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.2319 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2047 0.1533 0.1367 0.1367 0.1489 Levy 45,042,553 45,322,696 44,165,629 50,550,367 62,733,411 67,096,622 70,422,870 74,674,333 74,996,804 68,019,592 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. The schedule to the left lists the District secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last twelve fiscal years, plus the assessed value and the tax rate for FY 20010-11. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate increases from $0.1367 to $0.1489 per $100 net assessed value in FY 2010-11. NAV (Millions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate $0.3000 $0.2500 $0.2000 $0.1500 $0.1000 $0.0500 $0.0000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $02 03 04 05 06 07 Fiscal Year 14 08 09 10 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was consistent in the past two fiscal years and is projected to decrease in FY 2010-11. FY 20010-11 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVY Flood Control District Levy Description Salt River Proj. Net Effective Net Assessed Value Assessed Value FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: $ FY 2010-11 Adopted $ FY 2009-10 Adopted $ FY 2008-09 Adopted 45,681,391,282 $ 54,862,329,172 $ 54,626,432,391 $ 104,842,101 $ 105,522,275 $ 99,338,740 $ Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1-cent Levy 45,786,233,383 $ 54,967,851,447 $ 54,725,771,131 $ Tax Rates Property Tax Levy 4,578,623 $ 0.1489 $ 5,496,785 $ 0.1367 $ 5,472,577 $ 0.1367 $ SRP Payments in Lieu of Taxes(PILT) 68,019,592 $ 74,996,804 $ 74,674,333 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 155,961 $ 144,249 $ 135,796 $ Levy Limit FY 2011 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2011 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 81,769,690 0.1790 FY 2011 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 68,019,592 0.1489 Amount Under Limit: $ 13,750,099 16.8% 0.0301 FY 2011 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2011 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 75,831,110 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.1660 FY 2011 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 68,019,592 0.1489 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ FY 2011 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 15 $ 7,811,518 10.3% 0.0171 148,800 24.70 22.16 2.54 10.3% 68,175,553 75,141,053 74,810,129 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2010 vs. FY 2011 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2010: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ $ FY 2011: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill $ Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ 192,000 0.1367 26.25 148,800 0.1489 22.16 4.09 15.6% The FY 2010-11 budgeted property tax revenue of $67,353,206 is based on an historical collection rate of 99.0%. The table below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2010-11. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2010-11 $ Levy Amount Estimated Collections Collection Rate 68,019,592 $ 67,353,206 99% Licenses and Permits $ (Millions) The Flood Control District collects revenue from customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, and licenses. Rates for licenses and permits are approved by Licenses and Permit Revenue the Board of Directors, unless otherwise set forth in statute. The revenue 5.0 4.5 generated from licenses and 4.0 permits is used to offset the 3.5 cost of issuing the permits. 3.0 The chart to the left shows 2.5 FY 2008-09 actual and FY 2.0 1.5 2009-10 forecast revenue for 1.0 this category. In FY 2008-09, 0.5 there was a one-time 0.0 unanticipated revenue for 2009 2010* 2011** the Trans Western Pipeline to go over the McMicken Dam ($3.25M). In FY 2010-11, the District is projecting a decrease from FY 2009-10 for licenses and permits due to the decrease in construction and development in the County. 16 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2010-11 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of FY 2010-11 increase in the District’s secondary property tax rate. Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The District’s FY 2010-11 budget is reflective of receiving $4,908,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10* 2010-11** Payments in Lieu of Taxes $ 152,544 136,905 152,557 196,239 191,727 199,736 149,582 133,384 144,249 155,691 * Projected Actual ** Budget $ (Millions) The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of Micellaneous Revenue miscellaneous revenues 30,000 include sale of copies, 25,000 interest earnings, building rental, 20,000 insurance recoveries, 15,000 land sales, map sales 10,000 and equipment rental as 5,000 well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. In FY 20082009 2010* 2011** Fiscal Year 09, the Flood Control * Projected **Budgeted District sold a piece of excess land to Gilbert for $24.5M. Interest rates declined during FY 2009-10 leading to a decrease in interest revenue from FY 2009-10 to FY 2010-11. Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. 17 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s CIP. (See schedule on page 12) Flood Control District Fund Transfers $46 $45 $ (Millions) $44 $43 $42 $41 $40 $39 $38 $37 2009 2010* 2011** * Projected **Budgeted Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The schedules in the following section list estimated beginning fund balances, estimated sources and uses for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances at the end of the upcoming fiscal year. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Presentation of fund balances has been adjusted in accordance with Statement 54 of the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). For budgeting purposes, fund balances exclude any amounts defined as “non-spendable,” such as fixed assets. District ending fund balances are usually classified as “restricted,” because all District fund balances are subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions. However, a negative ending balance would be classified as “unassigned.” Estimating Fund Balances The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for the upcoming fiscal year begins with audited actual fund balance information as of the end of the prior fiscal year, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Beginning balances for the upcoming fiscal year are estimated by taking the audited ending balance for the prior fiscal year, adding to the forecasted sources for the current fiscal year, and subtracting the forecasted uses for the current fiscal year. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Fund Balance Summary Flood Control Fund (991) FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 15,776,797 $ 15,776,797 $ 43,092,131 $ 46,405,987 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 105,449,258 $ 77,453,474 (30) 4,500,000 $ 105,449,228 $ 81,953,474 $ 77,453,474 4,500,000 $ 81,953,474 $ 78,975,340 1,200 $ 78,976,540 $ 70,581,286 882,219 $ 71,463,505 $ Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 15,620,793 FY 2010 ADOPTED $ 33,268,450 44,709,458 77,977,908 $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 $ 77,357,694 $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 $ 77,357,694 $ 35,035,301 40,627,383 $ 75,662,684 $ 36,603,605 40,000,000 $ 76,603,605 Structural Balance $ 72,180,808 $ 40,723,163 $ 40,723,163 $ 43,940,039 $ 33,977,681 Accounting Adjustments $ 18 $ $ $ $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ 43,092,131 43,092,131 - $ 20,372,577 $ 20,372,577 - - - $ 20,372,577 $ 20,372,577 $ 46,405,987 $ 46,405,987 $ 41,265,887 $ 41,265,887 FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Flood Control Grants Fund (989) FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 800,000 800,000 $ $ 700,000 700,000 $ $ 800,000 800,000 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 800,000 800,000 $ $ 700,000 700,000 $ $ 800,000 800,000 Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - 19 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 23,950,674 $ 30,946,992 $ 30,946,992 $ 26,283,758 $ 24,075,924 Sources: Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 56,598,783 $ 56,598,783 $ 54,218,383 $ 54,218,383 $ 54,218,383 $ 54,218,383 $ 54,365,466 $ 54,965,466 $ 44,908,000 $ 44,908,000 Uses: Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 54,265,707 $ 54,265,707 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 57,173,300 $ 57,173,300 $ 60,548,481 $ 60,548,481 Accounting Adjustments $ $ $ $ $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ 26,283,758 $ 26,283,758 8 - $ 25,165,375 $ 25,165,375 - $ 25,165,375 $ 25,165,375 - $ 24,075,924 $ 24,075,924 - $ 8,435,443 $ 8,435,443 Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Flood Control Operations Fund (991) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 36,730,311 $ 77,453,474 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 36,730,311 $ 77,453,474 $ $ (126,706) $ (126,706) - $ - $ 36,603,605 $ 70,571,286 $ 15,445 $ 9,000 6,445 (15,445) $ (15,445) 10,000 10,000 36,603,605 $ 0.0% 70,581,286 0.0% Adjustments: Budget Balancing PEHPEP FY 09 Adjustments General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Property Taxes Agenda Item: C-49-09-066-2-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments (6,882,188) 11,442 (6,893,630) Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 20 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Operations Fund (991) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 40,627,383 $ - FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 40,627,383 $ - FY 2011 Budget Target $ 40,627,383 $ - $ (627,383) $ (627,383) - $ - 882,219 882,219 40,000,000 $ -1.5% 882,219 N/A Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Floodprone Property Acquisition Program Land Sales Excess Land Sales to Glendale Miscellaneous Land Sales Agenda Item: $ 7,500 814,290 60,429 FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Flood Control Grants Fund (989) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants FEMA Floodplain Map Grant FEMA Delineation Study Grant - $ 800,000 $ 600,000 200,000 800,000 600,000 200,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ (800,000) $ (600,000) (200,000) (800,000) (600,000) (200,000) $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ 800,000 800,000 800,000 $ 800,000 $ N/A 800,000 N/A C-69-10-018-G-00 C-69-10-019-G-00 Agenda Item: C-69-10-018-G-00 C-69-10-019-G-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants FEMA Floodplain Map Grant - $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Grants FEMA Floodplain Map Grant FEMA Delineation Study Grant $ Agenda Item: C-69-10-018-G-00 FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 21 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Expenditures Revenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 60,000,000 $ 13,591,000 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 60,000,000 $ 13,591,000 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 60,000,000 $ 13,591,000 $ 548,481 $ 548,481 (8,683,000) (8,683,000) $ 60,548,481 $ 0.9% 4,908,000 -63.9% $ 5,000 $ 3,550,000 55,000 10,000 5,000 25,000 1,060,000 40,000 3,198,000 330,000 15,000 263,000 210,000 100,000 979,000 15,909,000 8,358,000 905,000 7,400,000 5,745,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 2,623,000 548,481 Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount Flood Control District Projects F022- City of Chandler F027- City of Scottsdale F043- Town of Queen Creek F108- Sossaman Road Channel F109- Agua Fria River F211- Buckeye / Sun Valley ADMP F265- Granite Reef Wash F300- Spook Hill FRS & Outlet F310- Powerline FRS F331- Saddleback FRS F343- Wickenburg ADMP F350- Cave Buttes Dam F420- Spook Hill ADMP F442- East Mesa ADMP F450- Glendale / Peoria ADMP F470- White Tanks ADMP F480- Queen Creek ADMP F565- Durango ADMP F620- Maryvale ADMP F625- Metro ADMP F698- Maintenance Road Paving Program F699- Small Projects Assistance Program F700- Floodprone Properties Acquisitions FCPR- Flood Control Project Reserve ESCO - Energy Conservation Projects 1,000,000 88,000 427,000 100,000 221,000 1,817,000 255,000 - $ 60,548,481 $ 4,908,000 Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ - $ 40,627,383 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ - $ 40,627,383 FY 2011 Budget Target $ - $ 40,627,383 $ - $ - (627,383) (627,383) $ - $ N/A 40,000,000 -1.5% Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by State statutes and as directed by the District’s General Policies under District Resolutions 88-08 and 88-08A. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Significance within a master plan • Hydrologic/hydraulic significance • Level of protection • Area protected • Environmental quality • Area-wide benefit • Total project cost • Level of partner participation • Operation and maintenance costs • Operation and maintenance responsibility The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 23 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 32 capital projects are budgeted for FY 2010-11, and recommended to the Board by the Flood Control District. The projects are as follows: Flood Control Capital Project 022 - CITY OF CHANDLER 027 - CITY OF SCOTTSDALE 043 - TOWN OF QUEEN CREEK 108 - SOSSAMAN ROAD 109 - AGUA FRIA RIVER 117 - SOUTH PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 118 - ARIZONA CANAL DIVERSION CHANNEL 120 - SCOTTSDALE ROAD CORRIDOR DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN 121 - EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY 126 - SALT/GILA RIVER 201 - WHITE TANKS FRS NO. 4 202 - McMICKEN DAM 207 - BUCKEYE FRS NO. 1 211 - BUCKEYE/SUN VALLEY ADMS 265 - GRANITE REEF WASH 300 - SPOOK HILL FRS AND OUTLET 310 - POWERLINE FRS 331 - SADDLEBACK FRS 343 - WICKENBURG ADMP 350 - CAVE BUTTES DAM 420 - SPOOK HILL ADMP 442 - EAST MESA ADMP 450 - GLENDALE/PEORIA ADMP 470 - WHITE TANKS ADMP 480 - QUEEN CREEK/SONOQUI WASH ADMP 565 - DURANGO ADMP 620 - MARYVALE ADMP 625 - METRO ADMP 698 - MAINTENANCE ROAD PAVING PROGRAM 699 - SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 700 - FLOODPRONE PROPERTY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FCPR - FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT RESERVE ESCO - ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS TOTAL FUND 990 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Previous 4,977,384 6,028 29 10,887 36,929,178 132,508 57,374,055 2,090,522 2,951,612 12,539,779 26,808 15,709 438,486 42,230 3,600,922 16,414,214 35,853,823 74,410,382 104,452,164 20,363,586 22,626,836 76,784,591 3,998,654 979,285 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 477,019,673 $ Projected FY 09-10 5,000 305,000 40,000 327,000 4,627 237,000 1,148,000 5,887,000 1,047,753 1,106,000 10,000 782,000 306,000 146,158 1,233,000 160,000 51,000 405,000 3,106,000 4,413,746 2,507,000 15,272,000 6,046,000 5,380,000 4,456,000 1,846,842 816,501 - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 57,044,627 $ FY 10-11 5,000 3,550,000 55,000 10,000 5,000 380,000 333,000 45,000 10,000 3,367,000 10,000 520,000 25,000 1,060,000 40,000 3,198,000 330,000 15,000 263,000 210,000 100,000 979,000 15,909,000 8,358,000 905,000 7,400,000 5,745,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 2,623,000 548,481 60,548,481 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 11-12 5,000 3,550,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 8,300,000 10,000 200,000 25,000 1,060,000 3,270,000 3,530,000 610,000 40,000 1,995,000 20,260,000 2,225,000 780,000 4,060,000 5,270,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 1,235,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 60,000,000 $ FY 12-13 15,000 10,000 15,000 5,000 700,000 80,000 6,290,000 10,000 12,850,000 665,000 8,060,000 1,660,000 20,000 2,380,000 630,000 1,935,000 12,530,000 1,065,000 3,810,000 3,040,000 40,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 640,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 60,000,000 $ FY 13-14 155,000 2,040,000 220,000 30,000 1,110,000 10,000 10,000 2,300,000 5,680,000 8,060,000 1,650,000 2,970,000 7,340,000 30,000 9,490,000 3,390,000 6,800,000 20,000 1,120,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 4,025,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 60,000,000 $ FY 14-15 1,310,000 20,000 20,000 6,150,000 9,260,000 1,150,000 60,000 30,000 7,060,000 5,150,000 50,000 60,000 4,160,000 6,690,000 4,190,000 10,000 8,180,000 2,000,000 1,550,000 2,900,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 60,000,000 $ 5 Year Total 1,490,000 7,110,000 2,135,000 10,000 255,000 380,000 333,000 6,885,000 10,505,000 10,000 17,967,000 1,190,000 15,930,000 6,425,000 25,300,000 40,000 14,928,000 3,880,000 15,000 6,273,000 8,280,000 100,000 4,939,000 62,349,000 21,728,000 16,485,000 14,530,000 20,355,000 1,000,000 10,000,000 7,750,000 11,423,000 548,481 300,548,481 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Project 6,472,384 7,421,028 2,175,029 347,887 259,627 37,546,178 1,613,508 6,885,000 73,766,055 3,148,275 22,024,612 13,739,779 16,738,808 6,746,709 25,300,000 624,644 16,203,230 4,040,000 3,666,922 6,678,000 27,800,214 40,367,569 81,856,382 182,073,164 48,137,586 44,491,836 95,770,591 26,200,496 1,000,000 10,000,000 9,545,786 11,423,000 548,481 834,612,781 Project details for Energy Conservation Projects are in the Maricopa County’s Annual Business Strategies Capital Improvement Project section. Managing for Results (MFR) for All Projects Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Program Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety 24 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Result Measures: FY 2009-10 Year-To-Date Actual through March 2010 33% RESULT MEASURE Percent of Capital Dollars Expended FY 2009-10 Year-End Projected 95% Projected 2010-11 with Capital Improvement 100% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 689 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP; projects projected for FY 2010-11 completion will benefit 30 square miles. Common Flood Control CIP Acronyms ACDC – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel ADMP – Area Drainage Master Plan ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation CFS – Cubic Feet per Second FPAP – Floodprone Property Assistance Program FRS – Flood Retarding Structure IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation NRCS – Natural Resource Conservation Service 25 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: City of Chandler 022.01.32 - T1S/R5E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 022.01.32 022.01.32 022.01.32 022.01.32 - City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 022.01.32 - Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tailwater system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. The District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement for design and construction of the project; however, the project has been delayed due to a lack of City funding. The FY 2010-11 budget includes labor costs related to planning for the project. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for FY 2013-14. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 4,977,384 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 155,000 $ 1,310,000 $ 4,977,384 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 155,000 $ 1,310,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 26 5-Year Total 1,490,000 $ 1,490,000 $ Total Project 6,472,384 6,472,384 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: City of Scottsdale 027.10.32 - T3N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 2 027.10.32 027.10.32 027.10.32 027.10.32 - City of Scottsdale City of Scottsdale City of Scottsdale FY 2012 Project Description: 027.10.32 – Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. Project design is in progress, under the City’s lead, with the District providing cost-share funding under IGA FCD 2009A006. Construction is anticipated to begin during FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 6,028 $ 305,000 $ 3,550,000 $ 3,550,000 $ 10,000 $ 6,028 $ 305,000 $ 3,550,000 $ 3,550,000 $ 10,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 27 Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 7,110,000 $ 7,110,000 $ Total Project 7,421,028 7,421,028 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Town of Queen Creek 043.01.30 - T2S/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 043.01.30 043.01.30 043.01.30 043.01.30 - Town of Queen Creek Town of Queen Creek Town of Queen Creek FY 2015 Project Description: 043.01.30 – Cloud Road and Sossaman Road Basin and Outlet The Town of Queen Creek completed the Cloud Road Channel capacity study in March 2003. The study recommended construction of a new basin and outlet in the area of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road to mitigate historical flooding to nearby homes along Cloud Road to the west. The project consists of a basin located at approximately the southeast corner of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road and an outlet along Sossaman Road from the basin site north to Sonoqui Wash. The project would provide 100-year flood protection for over 120 homes in the area as well as protect public infrastructure including roads and utilities. Design is in progress under the Town’s lead. Construction schedule is dependent upon the availability of Town funding. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 29 $ 40,000 $ 55,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 2,040,000 $ 20,000 $ 29 $ 40,000 $ 55,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 2,040,000 $ 20,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 28 5-Year Total 2,135,000 $ 2,135,000 $ Total Project 2,175,029 2,175,029 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Sossaman Road 108.01.31 - T1S/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 2 108.01.31 108.01.31 108.01.31 108.01.31 - Flood Control District None Flood Control District FY 2011 Project Description: 108.01.31 – Sossaman Road Channel Improvements The segment of the existing Sossaman Road Channel between Baseline Road and Guadalupe Road is earthen with concrete grade-control structures. It was designed and built as part of a Maricopa County Highway Department project for Sossaman Road in 1981, to convey regional storm water flows. It is located in the mid-length portion of the three mile long Sossaman/Guadalupe channel and basin system, which the District owns, operates and maintains. District staff has identified cracking, undermining and buckling of some of the concrete structures, erosion of channel bottom and banks, nuisance water ponding areas and other evidence of channel functional distresses. During a storm event, the structural failure of a channel feature could compromise the channel’s structural integrity and the level of flood safety provided by the Sossaman/Guadalupe system. The preparation of design plans for needed improvements has been completed, and construction is expected to be substantially complete prior to the start of FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 10,887 $ 327,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,887 $ 327,000 $ 10,000 $ Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ 5-Year Total 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ Total Project 347,887 347,887 Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services $ $ Year 1 FY 10-11 32,197 4,558 36,754 $ $ 33,323 4,717 38,040 Year 2 FY 11-12 Year 3 FY 12-13 $ 34,489 $ 4,882 $ 39,371 $ Year 4 FY 13-14 Year 5 FY 14-15 35,696 $ 36,946 $ 5,053 5,230 40,749 $ 42,176 $ 38,239 5,413 43,652 Total Project $ 210,890 29,852 $ 240,742 Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices $ Supplies & Services $ - $ - $ 29,738 $ 3,017 32,755 $ 30,779 $ 3,122 33,901 $ 31,856 $ 32,971 $ 3,232 3,345 35,088 $ 36,316 $ 34,125 $ 159,469 3,462 16,178 37,587 $ 175,647 Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices $ Supplies & Services $ (32,197) $ (4,558) (36,754) $ (3,585) $ (1,700) (5,285) $ (3,710) $ (1,760) (5,470) $ (3,840) $ (3,975) $ (1,821) (1,885) (5,661) $ (5,860) $ (4,114) $ (51,421) (1,951) (13,674) (6,065) $ (65,095) 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Agua Fria River 109.02.30 - T1N/R1W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 5 109.02.30 109.02.30 109.02.30 109.02.30 - City of Avondale City of Avondale City of Avondale Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 109.02.30 – Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Road and McDowell Road. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. The Department is awaiting City funding for project construction. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 - $ 4,627 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 220,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 4,627 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 220,000 $ 20,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 30 5-Year Total 255,000 $ 255,000 $ Total Project 259,627 259,627 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: South Phoenix Drainage Improvement 117.09.31 - T1N/R2E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 5 117.09.31 117.09.31 117.09.31 117.09.31 - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2011 Project Description: 117.09.31 - 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Storm Drain and Detention Basin The 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Detention Basin & Storm Drain is identified as an element of regional flood control infrastructure as defined by the recommended plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen Drainage Improvement Project. A proposed 10-acre detention basin, to be located on the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Roeser Road, will intercept flows from the north and the east. The basin will be designed to intercept flows from a 100-year storm and will then discharge flows into a storm drain system to be constructed along Roeser Road between 27th Avenue and Broadway Road. This storm drain will then discharge into an existing 108-inch storm drain that will convey the flows from Broadway Road to the Salt River. The City of Phoenix is the lead agency for all project tasks and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The City and District are sharing equally in project costs. Storm drain construction is complete; basin construction is in progress and is expected to be completed during FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 26,629,664 $ 237,000 $ 380,000 $ 10,299,514 36,929,178 $ 237,000 $ 380,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 31 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 380,000 $ 380,000 $ Total Project 27,246,664 10,299,514 37,546,178 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Arizona Canal Diversion Channel 118.01.30 - T3N/R2E, T3N/R3E, T2N/R3E, T2N/R4E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3, 4 118.01.30 118.01.30 118.01.30 118.01.30 - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - FY 2011 Project Description: 118.01.30 – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC) Storm Drain Improvements The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the District, constructed the ACDC in the 1980s. The District owns, operates and maintains the channel. Storm drain inlet pipes have begun to exhibit cracking along vertical-walled segments of the ACDC. This cracking, if unaddressed, will allow storm water flows to enter the wall backfill to saturate and further consolidate, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the 20-foot vertical wall. This project will address this deficiency and will involve engineered storm drain improvements to extend the life of the channel wall. Storm drain inlets are being modified in three phases to allow for the exploration of multiple solutions. The first phase has been completed, the second phase is anticipated to be complete prior to FY 201011, and the third phase is anticipated to be complete during FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 132,508 $ 1,148,000 $ 333,000 $ 132,508 $ 1,148,000 $ 333,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 32 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 333,000 $ 333,000 $ Total Project 1,613,508 1,613,508 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Project Name: Flood Control District Scottsdale Road Corridor Drainage Improvements 120.XX.X1 - T3N/R4E Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): 2, 3 120.XX.X1 - Town of Paradise Valley 120.XX.X1 - Town of Paradise Valley (Potential/Unapproved) 120.XX.X1 - Town of Paradise Valley 120.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 120.XX.X1 - Berneil Channel Modifications The Berneil Channel is operated and maintained by the Town of Paradise Valley and generally conveys storm water between Scottsdale Road at Mountain View Road southwest to the Indian Bend Wash at approximately the 66th Street alignment. The channel is undersized for the 100-year event; in sections, it is unable to contain events of a 2-year return frequency. The Town submitted a project for modification of the Berneil Channel to the District’s prioritization procedure, and the project was recommended. Ideally, a modification project would increase channel capacity to convey the 100-year event, but funding constraints may limit capacity improvements to address 10-year events. The Town has completed a preliminary project study. Advancement of the project to final design and construction is largely dependent upon the availability of Town funding. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ Projected FY 09-10 - $ - $ Year 1 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 - $ 5,000 $ 700,000 $ 30,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 3,000,000 - $ 5,000 $ 700,000 $ 30,000 $ 6,150,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 33 5-Year Total 3,885,000 $ 3,000,000 6,885,000 $ Total Project 3,885,000 3,000,000 6,885,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District East Maricopa Floodway 121.03.32 - T1S/R6E 121.03.33 - T2S/R6E 121.XX.X1 - T1N/R6E, T1S/R6E, T1S/R7E, T2S/R6E 1, 2 121.03.32 - Flood Control District 121.03.33 - Flood Control District 121.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 121.03.32 - Town of Gilbert 121.03.33 - None 121.XX.X1 - None 121.03.32 - Flood Control District 121.03.33 - Flood Control District 121.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 121.03.32 - Outside Five-Year CIP 121.03.33 - Outside Five-Year CIP 121.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 121.03.32 - Rittenhouse Basin The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins - the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins - to mitigate EMF flows. Rittenhouse Basin construction is being accomplished in multiple phases. Design and the first phase of construction have been completed, and the final phase of construction is in progress, with completion expected during FY 2010-11. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, the Town of Gilbert will fund recreational amenities and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations. The Town has purchased an easement on the 160-acre basin site, and the District will contribute limited funding to aesthetically-enhance the site. 121.03.33 - Chandler Heights Basin The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins - the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins - to mitigate EMF flows. 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as funding becomes available. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will purchase an easement on the completed basin site, fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations in the future. 121.XX.X1 – East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District is attempting to address these issues through comparatively minor maintenance modifications; however, should the issues remain, the District would construct a concrete low flow channel along much of the length of the EMF. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 57,174,055 $ 5,887,000 $ 45,000 $ 10,000 $ 80,000 $ 1,110,000 $ 9,260,000 $ 200,000 57,374,055 $ 5,887,000 $ 45,000 $ 10,000 $ 80,000 $ 1,110,000 $ 9,260,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 35 5-Year Total 10,505,000 $ 10,505,000 $ Total Project 73,566,055 200,000 73,766,055 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Salt / Gila River 126.01.31 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E County District(s): Managing Department: 5 126.01.31 - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, City of Phoenix 126.01.31 - City of Phoenix 126.01.31 - Flood Control District 126.01.31 - FY 2011 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 126.01.31 - Tres Rios The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila Rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands; open water marshes and riparian corridors; and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2 million in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. The levee design and construction will occur in three phases - from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and along 123rd to Southern Avenue. Construction of the first two phases is complete. Construction of the third phase will likely be initiated prior to FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 1,991,368 $ 1,047,753 $ 10,000 $ 99,154 2,090,522 $ 1,047,753 $ 10,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 36 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 10,000 $ 10,000 $ Total Project 3,049,121 99,154 3,148,275 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: White Tanks FRS No. 4 201.01.31 - T1N/R2W, T1S/R2W 201.02.31 - T1N/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: 4 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District Flood Control District None NRCS None Flood Control District FY 2014 FY 2013 Project Description: 201.01.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet Channel The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommended a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam and a multiuse trail corridor. Due to the slowing of development in the area subsequent to the ADMP, the ADMP-recommended project now lacks a viable project partner for implementation. The District has initiated a study to evaluate outlet solutions that solely accomplish the District’s dam safety needs. Remaining regional flows would likely be addressed by a future ADMP update. Final design for a dam outlet is tentatively scheduled for FY 2010-11, with rights-of-way acquisition and construction following. 201.02.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (then Soil Conservation Service). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The District has entered into a watershed agreement with NRCS as a precursor to an intergovernmental agreement, and design is in progress. Construction notice to proceed is anticipated during FY 2010-11, contingent upon negotiation of an intergovernmental agreement with NRCS, committing NRCS funds. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 2,951,612 $ 1,106,000 $ 2,367,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 6,290,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,000,000 6,000,000 2,951,612 $ 1,106,000 $ 3,367,000 $ 8,300,000 $ 6,290,000 $ 10,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 38 - $ - $ 5-Year Total 10,967,000 $ 7,000,000 17,967,000 $ Total Project 15,024,612 7,000,000 22,024,612 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: McMicken Dam 202.02.31 - T3N/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 202.02.31 202.02.31 202.02.31 202.02.31 - Flood Control District USACE (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 202.02.31 - McMicken Dam Project The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately nine miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) that discharges to the Agua Fria River. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has pursued, and continues to pursue, federal funding assistance for this project. Project planning will include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 12,539,779 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 12,539,779 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,150,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 39 5-Year Total 1,190,000 $ 1,190,000 $ Total Project 13,739,779 13,739,779 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Buckeye FRS No. 1 207.01.31 - T1N/R3W, T1N/R4W, T1N/R5W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 207.01.31 207.01.31 207.01.31 207.01.31 - Flood Control District NRCS (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District FY 2014 Project Description: 207.01.31 - Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Since its construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The District completed a planning-level assessment of potential alternatives, including a modified dam, a channel/levee system and combinations of both providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Design is in progress and is expected to be completed by FY 2011-12. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 26,808 $ 782,000 $ 520,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,650,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 60,000 $ 10,200,000 1,000,000 26,808 $ 782,000 $ 520,000 $ 200,000 $ 12,850,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 60,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 40 5-Year Total 4,730,000 $ 11,200,000 15,930,000 $ Total Project 5,538,808 11,200,000 16,738,808 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Buckeye / Sun Valley ADMP 211.03.31 - T1S/R3W 211.XX.X1 - T1N/R4W, T1S/R4W County District(s): Managing Department: 4 211.03.31 - Town of Buckeye 211.XX.X1 - ADOT 211.03.31 - Town of Buckeye 211.XX.X1 - ADOT (Potential/Unapproved) 211.03.31 - Town of Buckeye 211.XX.X1 - ADOT (Potential/Unapproved) 211.03.31 - Outside Five-Year CIP 211.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 211.03.31 - Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (Maricopa County Highway 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. The project's IGA commits the District to provide 50 percent reimbursement to the Town of Buckeye (the project's lead agency). 211.03.31 - SR-85 Oglesby Outfall Channel The District completed the Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in June 2009. The ADMP recommended construction of five north-south regional drainage channels and basins to capture regional storm water flow and convey it to the Gila River: the White Tanks System, the Watson System, the Rooks System, the Oglesby System, and the Palo Verde System. The Oglesby System’s outfall would be constructed as a co-use Arizona Department of Transportation/District facility, built in conjunction with State Route 85 (SR-85) improvements from north of Baseline Road to the Gila River. ADOT has tentatively agreed to this plan, which would require ADOT to upsize its planned freeway channel to accommodate regional flows in exchange for District cost share participation. The portion of the Oglesby System upstream of SR-85 would be completed in the future – likely without the use of public funding – as the area develops. 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 15,709 $ 306,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 665,000 $ 5,680,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,709 $ 306,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 665,000 $ 5,680,000 $ 30,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 42 5-Year Total 6,425,000 $ 6,425,000 $ Total Project 6,746,709 6,746,709 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Granite Reef Wash 265.XX.X1 - T2N/R4E, T1N/R4E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): 2 265.XX.X1 - City of Scottsdale 265.XX.X1 - City of Scottsdale (Pending/ Unapproved) 265.XX.X1 - City of Scottsdale 265.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 265.XX.X1 – Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The City initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Chaparral Road south to Salt River. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of State Route 101 Loop and State Route 202. With the City as the lead agency, project implementation is awaiting the identification of partner funding and the selection of a Section Twelve alignment by the SRPMIC. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected FY 09-10 - $ - $ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 - $ 1,060,000 $ 1,060,000 $ 8,060,000 $ 8,060,000 $ 7,060,000 $ - $ 1,060,000 $ 1,060,000 $ 8,060,000 $ 8,060,000 $ 7,060,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 43 5-Year Total 25,300,000 $ 25,300,000 $ Total Project 25,300,000 25,300,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Spook Hill FRS and Outlet 300.01.31 - T1N/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: 2 300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - Flood Control District, Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - FY 2011 Completion Date: Project Description: 300.01.31 - Spook Hill FRS / Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202L) Modification Spook Hill FRS is a structural plan element of a Watershed Work Plan, prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) in January 1963, for the Buckhorn-Mesa Watershed Project located in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The dam was designed to impound floodwaters for a 100-year flood event and direct flows in excess of the 100-year flood event through an emergency spillway. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) was the lead agency in an effort to modify Spook Hill FRS to accommodate construction of the Power Road to University Drive segment of the Loop 202 freeway, which passes over the dam and within the dam's floodway. Modifications were completed in FY 2008-09 and corrected all identified dam safety deficiencies through installation of a central filter throughout the dam to protect against cracking, slope erosion repair, and replacement of the principal spillway. The District will provide easements to ADOT on District land, generating revenue that is expected to completely offset its $5 million contribution to the modification costs. Easement value is under legal negotiation, and the project remains active pending settlement. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 438,486 $ 146,158 $ 40,000 $ 438,486 $ 146,158 $ 40,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 44 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 40,000 $ 40,000 $ Total Project 624,644 624,644 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Powerline FRS 310.01.30 - T1S/R8E, T2S/R8E 310.01.31 - T1S/R8E County District(s): Managing Department: 1 310.01.30 310.01.31 310.01.30 310.01.31 310.01.30 310.01.31 310.01.30 310.01.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District Flood Control District NRCS (Pending/Unapproved) NRCS (Pending/Unapproved) Flood Control District Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP FY 2012 Project Description: 310.01.30 – PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS), the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the Loop 202 San Tan Freeway. The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. The FFMA recommended rehabilitation of the structures which could include structural improvements to the dam or replacement of the dams with channels, basins or other flood control facilities. The District has initiated a study to propose an ultimate recommended solution for the structures. Following alternative selection, the District would pursue federal cost share funding, with implementation likely occurring outside the Five-Year CIP. 310.01.31 - Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate reservoir storage monitoring and warning procedures have been put in place for this sitespecific condition at the dam. The District anticipates site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, will be required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall 45 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District rehabilitation or replacement. Remedial work will likely include engineered, preventative revisions to a segment of the dam. Design is in progress, and construction is anticipated to begin during FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 42,230 $ 1,233,000 $ 2,198,000 $ 270,000 $ 1,660,000 $ 1,650,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 3,000,000 5,000,000 42,230 $ 1,233,000 $ 3,198,000 $ 3,270,000 $ 1,660,000 $ 1,650,000 $ 5,150,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 46 5-Year Total 5,928,000 $ 9,000,000 14,928,000 $ Total Project 7,203,230 9,000,000 16,203,230 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Saddleback FRS 331.01.30 - T2N/R8W, T1N/R8W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 331.01.30 331.01.30 331.01.30 331.01.30 - Flood Control District NRCS (Pending/Unapproved) Flood Control District FY 2013 Project Description: 331.01.30 - Saddleback FRS Modifications The Saddleback Flood Retarding Structure (FRS), located just south of Interstate 10, is a compact earth-fill dam which receives floodwaters discharged from the Harquahala FRS and runoff water from a more than 22-square mile drainage area. The floodwater is conveyed to the Saddleback Diversion Channel via the principal spillway and outfalls south at the tributary of Centennial Wash. The structure is 5.1 miles in length and has a height of 21 feet, with a storage capacity of 3,620-acre feet. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), was the federal sponsor for construction. The District and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service were cost share partners on the initial construction of this structure. Saddleback FRS has experienced the formation of numerous erosion holes and longitudinal cracking along the entire length of centerline of the dam crest. The issue cannot be addressed by normal maintenance work and has developed into a dam safety issue which is continuing to worsen over time. The District has identified a need to modify the central material zone of the dam known as the central filter and to reduce erosion through the placement of rock mulch. Design of modifications is in progress, and construction is expected to begin in FY 2011-12. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 - $ 160,000 $ 330,000 $ 2,530,000 $ 20,000 $ 1,000,000 - $ 160,000 $ 330,000 $ 3,530,000 $ 20,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 47 Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 2,880,000 $ 1,000,000 3,880,000 $ Total Project 3,040,000 1,000,000 4,040,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Wickenburg ADMP 343.01.31 - T7N/R5W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 343.01.31 343.01.31 343.01.31 343.01.31 - Flood Control District Town of Wickenburg Town of Wickenburg FY 2011 Project Description: 343.01.31 - Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. The project provides a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It also conveys the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction was completed in FY 2008-09. The project remains active pending a condemnation court action anticipated to be completed in FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 3,575,922 $ 51,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 3,600,922 $ 51,000 $ 15,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 48 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 15,000 $ 15,000 $ Total Project 3,641,922 25,000 3,666,922 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Cave Buttes Dam 350.01.30 - T4N/R3E 350.01.31 - T4N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: 3 350.01.30 350.01.30 350.01.30 350.01.31 350.01.30 350.01.31 350.01.30 350.01.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control Flood Control None None Flood Control Flood Control FY 2014 FY 2012 District District District District Project Description: 350.01.30 – Cave Buttes Dam Modifications Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modification will likely include the construction of a gated outlet with a drainage channel and a seepage collection system at the downstream abutment contacts. Final design is anticipated to begin prior to FY 2010-11, with construction immediately following. 350.01.31 - Cave Buttes Dam Additional Access Rights Acquisition A survey of District land rights identified additional rights required for operations and maintenance access to Cave Buttes Dam. The District intends to acquire a roadway easement from the Arizona State Land Department. Due to State auction scheduling timelines, acquisition will take several years to complete. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 - $ 405,000 $ 263,000 $ 610,000 $ 2,380,000 $ 2,970,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 405,000 $ 263,000 $ 610,000 $ 2,380,000 $ 2,970,000 $ 50,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 49 5-Year Total 6,273,000 $ 6,273,000 $ Total Project 6,678,000 6,678,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Spook Hill ADMP 420.04.31 - T1N/R7E 420.05.31 - T1N/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: 2 420.04.31 420.05.31 420.04.31 420.05.31 420.04.31 420.05.31 420.04.31 420.05.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District Flood Control District City of Mesa City of Mesa (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District City of Mesa Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 420.04.31 - Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Design is in progress. Construction schedule will be driven by City funding authorization under a future City bond. 420.05.31 - Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and likely will involve construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, and storm drains south along Ellsworth Road and east along McKellips Road. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. A design concept study is being conducted by the District and is anticipated to be completed prior to FY 2010-11. This effort will accomplish an update to the ADMP for the subject project. Final design and construction schedules will be driven by City funding authorization under a future City bond. 50 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 14,665,460 $ 178,000 $ 122,000 $ 40,000 $ 380,000 $ 4,340,000 $ 60,000 $ 1,748,754 2,928,000 88,000 250,000 3,000,000 16,414,214 $ 3,106,000 $ 210,000 $ 40,000 $ 630,000 $ 7,340,000 $ 60,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 51 5-Year Total 4,942,000 $ 3,338,000 8,280,000 $ Total Project 19,785,460 8,014,754 27,800,214 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: East Mesa ADMP 442.11.31 - T1S/R7E, T1S/R8E 442.12.31 - T1N/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: 1, 2 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control Flood Control City of Mesa None Flood Control Flood Control FY 2011 FY 2011 District District District, City of Mesa District Project Description: 442.11.31 - Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements The Siphon Draw project is the final element of the recommended plan for the East Mesa ADMP for the area south of the Superstition Freeway and north of Warner Road. The project includes a channel along Meridian Road that intercepts the flow entering Maricopa County from Pinal County and conveys the flow to a detention basin constructed east of Meridian Road and north of Elliot Road. Construction contracts for the basin and an initial phase of the channel are in progress, and substantial completion is anticipated prior to FY 2010-11. Implementation of future channel phases will require additional partnering agreements and will likely accompany construction of adjoining Meridian Road segments. 442.12.31 - East Mesa Drain Reaches 4 and 7 Modification In June 1994, the District assumed maintenance responsibility (previously held by MCDOT) for the East Mesa Drains, 11 dedicated local drainage easements in Unincorporated Maricopa County. The District conducted a Candidate Assessment Report (CAR) in April 2004 to investigate improvement alternatives to mitigate the extensive maintenance costs associated with the drains. The consensus of the District identified Reaches 4 and 7 as the best targets for structural improvements to decrease maintenance costs. The bottom and side slopes of the Reach 4 channel have experienced scour erosion maintenance complications associated with trees and trash; the Reach 7 channel has experienced chronic erosion from inflows across its east bank. The project will be unilateral and will likely include installation of concrete lining. Design is complete, and construction is anticipated to be complete by FY 2010-11. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 27,513,453 $ 3,063,746 $ (327,000) $ 8,340,370 1,350,000 427,000 35,853,823 $ 4,413,746 $ 100,000 $ Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total (327,000) $ 427,000 100,000 $ Total Project 30,250,199 10,117,370 40,367,569 Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services $ $ Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services $ $ Year 1 FY 10-11 Year 2 FY 11-12 Year 3 FY 12-13 Year 4 FY 13-14 Year 5 FY 14-15 Total Project 1,900 $ 669 2,569 $ 2,480 $ 693 3,173 $ 2,567 $ 717 3,284 $ 2,657 $ 742 3,399 $ 2,750 $ 768 3,518 $ 2,846 $ 795 3,641 $ 15,199 4,385 19,584 - $ - $ 403 $ 223 626 $ 417 $ 231 648 $ 432 $ 239 671 $ 447 $ 247 694 $ 462 $ 256 718 $ 2,161 1,196 3,357 - $ - $ (2,077) $ (470) (2,547) $ (2,150) $ (486) (2,636) $ (2,225) $ (503) (2,728) $ (2,303) $ (521) (2,824) $ (2,383) $ (539) (2,923) $ 53 (11,138) (2,520) (13,658) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Glendale/Peoria ADMP 450.02.32 - T4N/R1E 450.03.34 - T3N/R2E 450.06.31 - T4N/R1E County District(s): Managing Department: 4 450.02.32 450.03.34 450.06.31 450.02.32 450.03.34 450.06.31 450.02.32 450.03.34 450.06.31 450.02.32 450.03.34 450.06.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - City of Peoria City of Glendale Flood Control District City of Peoria City of Glendale City of Peoria, MCDOT City of Peoria City of Glendale City of Peoria FY 2012 FY 2011 FY 2014 Project Description: 450.02.32 - Rose Garden Lane Channel The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update Study (G/P ADMPU) in May 2001 which made several recommendations for regional drainage infrastructure to provide 100year protection for the watershed. The Rose Garden Lane Channel is a high priority recommendation of the G/P ADMPU and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The City Council of Peoria adopted the recommendations of the G/P ADMPU in May 2001, and the Board of Directors of the District adopted the G/P ADMPU recommendations in December 2001 (Resolution FCD 2001R012). This project involves construction of an open channel along the north side of Rose Garden Lane and a basin at the Agua Fria River outfall, and the project will provide a 100-year level of protection for an area between approximately Lake Pleasant Road and the Agua Fria River, south of Rose Garden Lane. The channel will accept and convey flows that would otherwise flow over Rose Garden Lane and overflow the Beardsley Channel. Intergovernmental agreements between the District and the City of Peoria are in place for design and construction of the project, and the City is the lead agency for all tasks. Channel construction is complete. The basin site has been acquired, and excavation is being accomplished through a material auction at no cost to the project partners. 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 450.03.34 – Northern Avenue Storm Drain (47th Avenue to 63rd Avenue) The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in 1987. The District partnered with the City of Glendale, City of Peoria and other agencies to construct the Northern and Orangewood Storm Drain and Basin project in 2001 in accordance with the ADMP. The project included a basin at 63rd Avenue and Northern Avenue, and storm drains along Northern Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, with an ultimate outfall at the New River. The Northern Avenue Storm Drain Project, also a recommended component of the Glendale/Peoria ADMP, enhances the efficiency of the previously-constructed project, directing storm water to the basin at 63rd Avenue, while mitigating flooding hazards historically affecting the downstream developed area. The City of Glendale unilaterally funded project design. Construction is in progress, and the District provided an up-front funding contribution. The City of Glendale will act as lead agency throughout the project and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 450.06.31 - Pinnacle Peak Road Drainage (99th Avenue to the Agua Fria River) The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale/Peoria ADMP Update (ADMPU) to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMPU recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from 87th Avenue to the Agua Fria River. The City of Peoria is accomplishing the 100-year conveyance drainage component from 87th Avenue to 99th Avenue through development stipulations. This project provides for drainage from 99th Avenue west to an ultimate outfall in the Agua Fria River. The project will also provide roadway improvements along this alignment to be paid for by the City of Peoria. Design and land acquisition are in progress and are expected to be completed during FY 2010-11. Construction will follow pending the negotiation of a construction cost-share agreement. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 63,772,909 $ 1,721,000 $ 879,000 $ 995,000 $ 935,000 $ 30,000 $ 10,637,473 786,000 100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 74,410,382 $ 2,507,000 $ 979,000 $ 1,995,000 $ 1,935,000 $ 30,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 55 - $ - $ 5-Year Total 2,839,000 $ 2,100,000 4,939,000 $ Total Project 68,332,909 13,523,473 81,856,382 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: White Tanks – Agua Fria ADMP 470.04.30 - T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W 470.04.32 - T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W 470.13.31 - T1N/R1W 470.14.31 - Loop 303 Corridor 470.15.31 - T3N/R1W 470.16.31 - T1N/R1W County District(s): Managing Department: 4, 5 470.04.30 470.04.32 470.13.31 470.14.31 470.15.31 470.16.31 470.04.30 470.04.32 470.13.31 470.14.31 470.15.31 470.16.31 470.04.30 470.04.32 470.13.31 470.14.31 470.15.31 470.16.31 470.04.30 470.04.32 470.13.31 470.14.31 470.15.31 470.16.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: - Flood Control District Flood Control District Flood Control District Flood Control District, ADOT MCDOT City of Avondale NRCS None City of Goodyear ADOT (Pending/Unapproved) MCDOT (Pending/Unapproved) City of Avondale Flood Control District Flood Control District City of Goodyear ADOT, Flood Control District MCDOT City of Avondale FY 2012 FY 2013 Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP FY 2011 470.04.30 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Modifications White Tanks FRS No.3 is ranked first in the nation by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under their dam rehabilitation priority ranking process. The District and NRCS have proceeded with a rehabilitation project under the “Small Watershed Rehabilitation Amendment" (Public Law 106-472), 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District which authorizes NRCS to assist watershed project sponsors with rehabilitation of aging dams on a 65 percent federal, 35 percent local cost share basis, and NRCS is additionally providing technical assistance for the project. The District and NRCS completed the final work plan and environmental assessment in 2004 and signed an IGA for the project early in FY 2004-05. In FY 2003-04, the District contracted an alternative evaluation and chose to modify the dam. The first phase of dam modification is complete. The first phase included plugging and abandoning existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP) outlets, construction of principal pipe outlets to replace the existing CMP outlets, and construction of a soil cement embankment section and cutoff walls in the dam's south fissure risk zone. The second phase of construction includes a new emergency spillway drop structure and non-fissure risk zone embankment segments. Construction is expected to begin prior to FY 2010-11. 470.04.32 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel In FY 2005-06, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4. This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Bethany Home Road south to Interstate 10 (I-10), the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. The District anticipates completing the project without substantial funding from other agencies. Design is in progress, and construction is expected to begin during FY 2010-11. Exclusive of future agreements, operations and maintenance of the completed project will be the District’s responsibility. 470.13.31 - Bullard Wash Phase II Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This stormwater would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to I-10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City funding and will likely be phased, with some phases being completed outside the five-year CIP. 57 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 470.14.31 - Loop 303 Drainage Improvements The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for stormwater management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with State Route 303 Loop (SR-303L). The District will partner with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) in this regional project, and intends to construct drainage solutions from south of Van Buren Street to the Gila River, while ADOT will construct the project from Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will precede construction of SR-303L. The District anticipates executing an intergovernmental agreement with ADOT for this project prior to FY 2010-11 and initiating design efforts. 470.15.31 - Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)/Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from SR-303L to Reems Road, subsequently connecting to the Dysart Basin at Falcon Dunes Golf Course and will construct a shared roadway drainage / regional flood control facility east of Reems Road to collect and convey additional flows to the Agua Fria River. The project provides 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with MCDOT. Construction is expected late in the five-year CIP, in sequence with Northern Parkway construction. 470.16.31 - Elm Lane Drainage Mitigation The Elm Drainage Mitigation Project at Central Avenue and Elm Lane in Avondale involves the construction of 0.8 miles of storm drains with catch basins, retention basins and an outfall culvert. The project resulted from an alternatives -study conducted by the City of Avondale in response to flooding in streets and homes. The drainage improvements will provide protection from a 10-year storm event. The City of Avondale is acting as the project's lead agency, and the District will share in 50 percent of the total project cost. Construction is in progress. Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Funding Source Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 Flood Control District Property Tax $ 85,142,521 $ 11,392,000 $ 15,909,000 $ 19,010,000 $ 10,030,000 $ 7,990,000 $ 4,160,000 $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA 19,309,643 3,880,000 1,250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000 Project Total $ 104,452,164 $ 15,272,000 $ 15,909,000 $ 20,260,000 $ 12,530,000 $ 9,490,000 $ 4,160,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 58 5-Year Total Total Project 57,099,000 $ 153,633,521 5,250,000 28,439,643 62,349,000 $ 182,073,164 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Queen Creek ADMP 480.04.32 - T2S/R6E, T2S/R7E 480.04.34 - T2S/R7E 480.05.31 - T1S/R6E County District(s): Managing Department: 1 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.05.31 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.05.31 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.05.31 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.05.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District Flood Control District Town of Gilbert Town of Queen Creek None Town of Gilbert Town of Queen Creek Flood Control District Town of Gilbert Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 480.04.32 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) The Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in FY 2008-09, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow to prevent flooding to property adjacent to the wash and to capture and convey sheet flow. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the proposed 200-foot-wide channel. The Riggs Road to Crismon Road portion of Sonoqui Wash collects overland flow from the south and conveys it into the main branch of Sonoqui Wash. This is a joint project between the District and the Town of Queen Creek. The District is acting as lead agency for design, which is in progress. Under the project cost share agreement, the District will construct improvements upstream (west and northwest) of Ellsworth Road; the Town will construct improvements downstream of Ellsworth Road. 59 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 480.04.34 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) The Queen Creek / Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of channelization has been completed. The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization will outfall to the second phase, which is being implemented by the District in partnership with the Town of Queen Creek. The third phase includes channelization of the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northeast to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is located in unincorporated Maricopa County, and the District anticipates funding the project unilaterally. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Design is in progress. 480.05.31 - Queen Creek Wash (Recker to Higley) The Town of Gilbert proposed improvements to Queen Creek Wash from Recker to Higley roads to complete channel improvements that have already been accomplished upstream of Recker and downstream of Higley. This project replaces the existing wash with a natural desert 100-year capacity channel. In accordance with the IGA, the Town is the lead agency for the project and will own, operate and maintain the completed project; the District's cost share is limited to a cap of $1 million. The Town has completed design and construction, with the exception of landscaping and aesthetic enhancements that are awaiting the resumption of development in the area. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 14,090,595 $ 5,746,000 $ 8,358,000 $ 2,225,000 $ 1,065,000 $ 3,390,000 $ 6,690,000 $ 6,272,991 300,000 20,363,586 $ 6,046,000 $ 8,358,000 $ 2,225,000 $ 1,065,000 $ 3,390,000 $ 6,690,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 60 5-Year Total 21,728,000 $ 21,728,000 $ Total Project 41,564,595 6,572,991 48,137,586 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District Durango ADMP 565.04.31 - T1N/R1E, T1N/R2E 565.04.32 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E 565.04.33 - T1N/R1E 565.XX.X1 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E 5 565.04.31 - Flood Control District, City of Phoenix 565.04.32 - Flood Control District, City of Avondale 565.04.33 - Flood Control District, City of Phoenix 565.XX.X1 - Flood Control District, City of Avondale 565.04.31 - City of Phoenix 565.04.32 - City of Avondale (Projected / Unapproved) 565.04.33 - City of Phoenix 565.XX.X1 - City of Avondale (Projected / Unapproved) 565.04.31 - City of Phoenix 565.04.32 - City of Avondale 565.04.33 - City of Phoenix 565.XX.X1 - City of Avondale 565.04.31 - FY 2011 565.04.32 - Outside Five-Year CIP 565.04.33 - Outside Five-Year CIP 565.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 565.04.31 - 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel The 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) was recommended by the Durango ADMP and was requested by the City of Phoenix. The project will provide an interim regional outfall channel and is the first phase of the DRCC project. Project improvements will reduce flooding hazards north of the Union Pacific Railroad and remove approximately 71 structures from an identified floodplain. The City was the lead agency for design of both the storm drain and the DRCC and is the lead agency for storm drain construction. The District is the lead agency for construction of the first phase of the DRCC, which is in progress and is anticipated to be completed prior to FY 2010-11. Construction of the 75th Avenue Storm Drain was initiated by the City of Phoenix but is at a stoppage awaiting resolution of a utility conflict. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 565.04.32 - Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Avenue to Agua Fria River) The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. th This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107 Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the FY 2002-03 Prioritization Procedure, and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. Project implementation is awaiting an IGA between the District and the City of Avondale. 565.04.33 - Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Avenue to 107th Avenue) The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. th This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75 Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. Construction of a basin (or basins) along the channel alignment is required prior to the construction of box culverts that will connect the linear basins and allow for an outfall to the phase to be constructed west of 107th Avenue. Design is in progress under a partnering agreement between the District and the City of Phoenix. 565.XX.X1 - Van Buren Street Channel (99th Avenue to Agua Fria River) This project, proposed by the City of Avondale, would intercept flows along Van Buren Street and convey them west to the Agua Fria River. In addition to alleviating an existing flooding hazard at the 99th Avenue and Van Buren Street intersection, the project would complement the existing Durango Regional Outfall Channel and provide the City of Tolleson with additional outlet capacity for a future project to minimize a floodplain impacting Tolleson residents further to the east. The District is completing a design concept study, as the proposed project would constitute a modification to the District’s previously-completed Durango Area Drainage Master Plan. Following completion of the study, the District may negotiate agreements with the City of Avondale and City of Tolleson for implementation. 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 18,112,463 $ 3,567,000 $ 684,000 $ 780,000 $ 3,810,000 $ 6,800,000 $ 4,190,000 $ 4,514,373 1,813,000 221,000 22,626,836 $ 5,380,000 $ 905,000 $ 780,000 $ 3,810,000 $ 6,800,000 $ 4,190,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 63 5-Year Total 16,264,000 $ 221,000 16,485,000 $ Total Project 37,943,463 6,548,373 44,491,836 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Maryvale ADMP 620.03.32 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E 620.03.33 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E 620.03.34 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E County District(s): Managing Department: 4, 5 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - City of Glendale - City of Phoenix, City City of Phoenix, City City of Glendale City of Phoenix, City City of Phoenix, City City of Glendale FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 of Glendale of Glendale of Glendale of Glendale Project Description: 620.03.32 - Bethany Home Outfall Channel The Bethany Home Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The channel will have a 100-year capacity and will serve as an outfall for storm drains to be constructed in Camelback Road and Bethany Home Road. The completed system will remove approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the channel, extending west from the Agua Fria Freeway to the New River along the Bethany Home Road alignment, has been completed by ADOT with District participation. ADOT increased the size of their channel to accommodate additional flows from the east. Phase II of the channel extends from 63rd Avenue south of Indian School Road northwest to the Agua Fria Freeway alignment at Bethany Home Road. The District is the lead agency for construction of this channel, with the cities of Phoenix and Glendale each contributing approximately 25 percent of the channel cost. Construction between 67th Avenue to the Agua Fria Freeway alignment is completed, and remaining construction will likely be completed prior to FY 2010-11. Final accounting is expected to be completed during FY 2010-11. 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 620.03.33 – Camelback Road Storm Drain (59th Avenue to 75th Avenue) The Camelback Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the cities of Phoenix and Glendale. The project consists of a trunk line in Camelback Road with capacity for a 10-year storm event and lateral storm drains aiding in collection. The storm drain ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The District is the lead agency for project design and construction, and the cities of Phoenix and Glendale are each contributing 25 percent of the project cost. Design is in progress, and construction will likely begin prior to FY 2010-11. 620.03.34 – Bethany Home Road Storm Drain (79th Avenue to 59th Avenue) The Bethany Home Road Storm Drain project, resulting from the District’s Maryvale Area Drainage Master Study, collects and conveys sheet flow that has historically flooded the Maryvale neighborhood in the city of Glendale. The project consists of a 10-year storm drain in Bethany Home Road that ultimately conveys flows to the New River through the Bethany Home Outfall Channel. The city of Glendale is the lead agency for project design and construction, and the District will contribute 50 percent of the project cost. Design of the storm drain from approximately 71st Avenue to 79th Avenue is in progress by the City of Glendale, and construction will likely begin prior to FY 2010-11. Remaining design and construction will require the identification of additional city funding. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 41,181,150 $ 781,000 $ 5,583,000 $ 1,060,000 $ 3,040,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 35,603,441 3,675,000 1,817,000 3,000,000 76,784,591 $ 4,456,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 4,060,000 $ 3,040,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 65 5-Year Total 9,713,000 $ 4,817,000 14,530,000 $ Total Project 51,675,150 44,095,441 95,770,591 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Metro ADMP 625.01.30 - T1N/R3E 625.02.30 - T2N/R4E 625.XX.X1 - T2N/R4E County District(s): Managing Department: 2, 3 625.01.30 - City of Phoenix 625.02.30 - Flood Control District 625.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 625.01.30 - City of Phoenix 625.02.30 - City of Phoenix 625.XX.X1 - City of Phoenix (Potential/Unapproved) 625.01.30 - City of Phoenix 625.02.30 - City of Phoenix 625.XX.X1 - City of Phoenix (Potential/Unapproved) 625.01.30 - Outside Five-Year CIP 625.02.30 - FY 2013 625.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 625.01.30 – Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) The FY 2007-08 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project’s conceptual design involves the installation of drainage features along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. When combined with the complete downtown system recommended by the ADMP, this project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. Design of the Jefferson Street and Fillmore Street components will be completed prior to FY 2010-11. Construction of the Fillmore Street components is anticipated to begin prior to FY 2010-11; construction of the Jefferson Street components is anticipated to begin during FY 2010-11. Design and construction of the 1st Avenue component will likely require the approval of additional funding in a future City bond election. Phoenix is acting as lead agency for project design and construction, and the District will contribute 50 percent of the project cost. 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 625.02.30 – Arcadia Drive Drainage Improvements The District is partnering with the City of Phoenix for design of the Arcadia Drive Drainage Improvements Project. This Project will include extension of the Old Cross Cut Canal (two 10’ X 10’ reinforced box culvert cells) from Indian School Road to just downstream of the Arizona Canal, a storm drain from the Arizona Canal to Camelback Road within the Arcadia Drive roadway, a storm drain under the Arizona Canal connecting the Arcadia Drive storm drain and the Old Cross Cut extension, and associated structures and features. Once complete, the Project will provide an outfall for future storm drains, principally along Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard Collectively, these features will reduce flooding to the Arcadia area resulting from storm water runoff originating from Camelback Mountain that has historically ponded along the Arizona Canal. The District is the lead agency completing the design of the project. Design is anticipated to begin in the winter of 2010 and conclude in the winter of 2011. Subject to funding constraints, construction would begin shortly thereafter. 625.XX.X1 – Arcadia Lafayette Interceptor Drain The greater Arcadia Area Drainage Improvements Project, recommended by the District’s Metro Area Drainage Master Plan, is being accomplished in multiple phases. The first phase includes construction of an outfall – the Arcadia Drive Drainage Improvements Project. Later phases will include construction of interceptor drains, primarily in Camelback Road and Lafayette Boulevard, intended to collect flows upstream (north) of the Arizona Canal. City funding for these future phases will likely require future bond elections, and schedule would be dependent on funding availability. Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 $ 3,998,654 $ 1,696,842 $ 5,490,000 $ 2,770,000 $ 40,000 $ 1,120,000 $ 8,180,000 $ 150,000 255,000 2,500,000 Project Total $ 3,998,654 $ 1,846,842 $ 5,745,000 $ 5,270,000 $ 40,000 $ 1,120,000 $ 8,180,000 $ Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 67 5-Year Total 17,600,000 $ 2,755,000 20,355,000 $ Total Project 23,295,496 2,905,000 26,200,496 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District Maintenance Road Paving Program 698.10.30–T1N/R6E, T1S/R6E, T1S/R7E, T2S/R6E 1, 2 698.10.30 - Flood Control District 698.10.30 - None 698.10.30 - Flood Control District 698.10.30 - FY 2012 Project Description: 698.10.30 - East Maricopa Floodway Maintenance Road Paving Flood control facilities operated and maintained by the District were commonly built in the past with unpaved dirt maintenance roads. District maintenance activities require the use of these roads, potentially adversely impacting air quality. This project includes chip-seal improvements to the unpaved East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) maintenance roads. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the EMF in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately owned golf courses. Maintenance road improvements are anticipated to begin in the FY 2010-11 and will likely be phased. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected FY 09-10 - $ - $ Year 1 Year 2 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 68 Year 3 FY 12-13 - $ - $ Year 4 FY 13-14 - $ - $ Year 5 FY 14-15 - $ - $ - $ - $ 5-Year Total 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ Total Project 1,000,000 1,000,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Small Projects Assistance Program 699.XX.X1 - N/A 699.11.X0 - T1N/R7E 699.11.X1 - T1N/R5E 699.11.X2 - T3N/R4E 699.11.X3 - T2N/R3E 699.11.X4 - T1S/R3E 699.11.X5 - T5N/R4E 699.11.X6 - T3N/R1W County District(s): Managing Department: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 699.XX.X1 - TBD 699.11.X0 - City of 699.11.X1 - City of 699.11.X2 - City of 699.11.X3 - City of 699.11.X4 - City of 699.11.X5 - City of 699.11.X6 - City of 699.XX.X1 - TBD 699.11.X0 - City of 699.11.X1 - City of 699.11.X2 - City of 699.11.X3 - City of 699.11.X4 - City of 699.11.X5 - City of 699.11.X6 - City of 699.XX.X1 - TBD 699.11.X0 - City of 699.11.X1 - City of 699.11.X2 - City of 699.11.X3 - City of 699.11.X4 - City of 699.11.X5 - City of Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: 69 Mesa Mesa Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Scottsdale Surprise Mesa Mesa Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Scottsdale Surprise Mesa Mesa Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Scottsdale Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Completion Date: Flood Control District 699.11.X6 - City of Surprise 699.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP 699.11.X0 - FY 2011 699.11.X1 - FY 2011 699.11.X2 - FY 2011 699.11.X3 - FY 2011 699.11.X4 - FY 2011 699.11.X5 - FY 2011 699.11.X6 - FY 2011 Project Description: 699.XX.X1 – Small Projects Assistance Program By the direction of the Board, since 1995, District capital projects have been evaluated under the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure. The evaluation criteria of the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure promote the prioritization of capital projects that are regional in nature; however, localized flood hazards exist throughout Maricopa County, and the mitigation of these localized flood hazards, on a limited basis, is consistent with the District’s statutory obligation. The District has developed a Small Project Assistance Program, intended to provide financial assistance to the municipalities of Maricopa County, on a trial basis, in implementing local flood hazard mitigation capital projects. The highly-structured program authorizes a collective maximum of $2,000,000 per fiscal year in funding for small projects targeting mitigation of historic flooding hazards, with a $250,000 per-project District cost share cap. 699.11.X0 – Broadway Road and 72nd Street Drainage Improvements The City of Mesa proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring first (tied) among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of four residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.11.X1 – Broadway Road Drainage Improvements West of Mesa Drive The City of Mesa proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring sixth among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of a commercial property and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 699.11.X2 – 41st Place and Charter Oak Road Drainage Improvement Project The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring third among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of eight residential properties in the Las Haciendas subdivision and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.11.X3 – Campbell Avenue Storm Drain (32nd Street to 35th Street) Project The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring fourth among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of five residential properties in the vicinity of the project. 699.11.X4 – 15th Avenue and Dobbins Road Channel Project The City of Phoenix proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring fifth among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of six structures within the th Arizona Humane Society facility at 15 Avenue and Dobbins Road and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.11.X5 – Boulder Ridge Flood Reduction Project The City of Scottsdale proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring seventh among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of four residential properties within the Boulder Ridge subdivision and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 699.11.X6 – Jerry Street Drainage Improvements Project The City of Surprise proposed this project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project Assistance Program for FY 2010-11. The project was recommended, scoring first (tied) among fourteen submittals by various municipalities. The project will reduce flows that have caused documented historic flooding of seven residential properties and will reduce flows that have caused roadway or access closures in the vicinity of the project. 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected FY 09-10 - $ - $ - $ - $ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 72 5-Year Total 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ Total Project 10,000,000 10,000,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Floodprone Property Assistance Program 700.XX.X1 - N/A 700.09.30 - T4N/R2E 700.09.31 - T7N/R5W 700.09.32 - T5N/R3W 700.09.34 - T4N/R2E 700.09.35 - T7N/R2E 700.09.36 - T4N/R2E 700.10.30 - T4N/R2E 700.10.31 - T4N/R1E 700.10.32 - T1N/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Flood Control District None Flood Control District 700.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP 700.09.30 - FY 2011 700.09.31 - FY 2011 700.09.32 - FY 2011 700.09.34 - FY 2011 700.09.35 - FY 2011 700.09.36 - FY 2011 700.10.30 - FY 2011 700.10.31 - FY 2011 700.10.32 - FY 2011 Project Description: 700.XX.X1 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Unallocated Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. 73 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 700.09.30 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Ladd (APN 209-04-070D) This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.09.31 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: 019A) Welna (APN 505-14- This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.09.32 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Sturtevant (APN 503-32114) This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.09.34 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Light (APN 209-04-070F) This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.09.35 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Miller (APN 202-11-020E) This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.09.36 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: 070G) Collier (APN 209-04- This property, evaluated in the FY 2008-09 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.10.30 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: 070B) Delozier (APN 209-04- This property, evaluated in the FY 2009-10 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District has purchased the property, and land management tasks remain to be completed. 700.10.31 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Flanagan (APN 201-21041C) This property, evaluated in the FY 2009-10 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to FY 2010-11 and completing land management tasks during FY 2010-11. 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 700.10.32 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Bible (APN 502-36-101Q) This property, evaluated in the FY 2009-10 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to FY 2010-11 and completing land management tasks during FY 2010-11. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 979,285 $ 816,501 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 979,285 $ 816,501 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 5-Year Total 7,750,000 $ 7,750,000 $ Total Project 9,545,786 9,545,786 Year 5 FY 14-15 Total Project Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Supplies & Services Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Supplies & Services Year 1 FY 10-11 Year 2 FY 11-12 Year 3 FY 12-13 Year 4 FY 13-14 $ $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,035 $ 1,035 $ 1,071 $ 1,071 $ 1,109 $ 1,109 $ 1,148 $ 1,148 $ 5,363 5,363 $ $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,035 $ 1,035 $ 1,071 $ 1,071 $ 1,109 $ 1,109 $ 1,148 $ 1,148 $ 5,362 5,362 Projects 700.10.30, 700.10.31 and 700.10.32 involve the acquisition of floodprone properties and demolition of the structures on those properties. The vacant land will be maintained by the District, or sold at some future date if appropriate. 75 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Flood Control Project Reserve NA County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 NA NA NA NA Project Description: Flood Control Project Reserve The District’s budgeted project reserve provides supplemental funding for unanticipated cost increases and increases project scheduling flexibility, allowing the District to accelerate flood control projects when it is appropriate or advantageous to do so. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals Projected FY 09-10 - $ - $ - $ - $ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 2,623,000 $ 1,235,000 $ 640,000 $ 4,025,000 $ 2,900,000 $ 2,623,000 $ 1,235,000 $ 640,000 $ 4,025,000 $ 2,900,000 $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 76 5-Year Total 11,423,000 $ 11,423,000 $ Total Project 11,423,000 11,423,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Motion Approve the Library District FY 2011 Budget in the amount of $28,088,417 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Library District. This amount represents no net change from the Tentative Adopted budget of $28,088,417. Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Library District’s FY 2011 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer. 77 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Don Stapley, Chairman, District 2 Fulton Brock, District 1 Andrew Kunasek District 3 Max W. Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District revenue budget for FY 2010-11 is $25,140,419 and expenditure budget for FY 2010-11 is $28,088,417. The tax levy will decrease slightly from FY 2009-10 to FY 2010-11. The tax rate will increase from $0.0353 to $0.0412 per $100 of assessed value. In FY 2009-10, the Campbell Library closed and the District completed the migration of operations of the Civic Center Library to the City of Avondale. The District will have opened three new branches by the time FY 2009-10 ends: Goodyear, Sun City and Fairway. Additionally, the District is continuing to convert the independent public libraries in the County to the Polaris Integrated Library System. Mesa is the latest library to convert to Polaris; Glendale and Chandler have expressed interest as well. Property Tax Revenue by Fiscal Year $22,000,000 $20,107,587 $20,053,624 FY 2008‐09 Actual FY 2009‐10 Forecast $20,263,686 $20,000,000 Property Tax Revenue FY 2010-11 marks the milestone of the Southeast Regional Library in Gilbert being fully funded by the Town of Gilbert. The White Tank Library will also open in FY 2010-11. It is a state of the art facility built in partnership with the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department. The new library is designed to be extremely environmentally friendly, from the exterior that blends with the surrounding park, to the lighting and power systems that have earned the building a Gold Certification in accordance with rating standards recognized by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) with Net Zero Pollution. $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 FY 2010‐11 Adopted Use of the District library facilities continues to grow as the use of materials increased by approximately 15% over the previous year. This is the sixth year in a row that use has increased by double digits. The Summer Reading Program in FY 2009-10 reached 63,000 children and teens, an increase of more than 40% over the previous fiscal year. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager Note: No Changes from Recommended 79 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Angie Flick, Management & Budget Supervisor Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. Strategic Goals • Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: Customer satisfaction was 87.3% in FY 2009-10 with the library's collection of books and other materials. • Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: Through March 2010, 1,724 Youth Programs have been presented to 55,533 children. The summer reading program, which grew from 45,000 children in FY 2008-09 to 63,000 children in FY 2009-10, will begin in May 2010. 81 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE CAPITAL $ 11,301,895 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ 20,263,686 $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES 269,405 INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,052,843 FINES & FORFEITS 719,350 INTEREST EARNINGS 50,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 130,135 TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ 24,485,419 $ NON-RECURRING GRANTS INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ - $ 25,000 25,000 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,510,419 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ 11,085,021 $ SUPPLIES 5,115,774 SERVICES 5,651,588 CAPITAL 59,034 TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 21,911,417 $ NON-RECURRING SUPPLIES $ SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 25,000 $ 112,000 231,582 368,582 $ TOTAL USES $ 22,279,999 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 2,574,002 $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 13,532,315 $ 82 SUBTOTAL 5,348,416 ELIMINATIONS TOTAL $ 16,650,311 $ - $ 16,650,311 - $ 20,263,686 $ 269,405 3,052,843 719,350 50,000 130,135 - $ 24,485,419 $ - $ 20,263,686 269,405 3,052,843 719,350 50,000 130,135 $ 24,485,419 540,000 $ 40,000 50,000 231,582 861,582 $ 861,582 540,000 $ 40,000 75,000 231,582 886,582 $ $ 25,372,001 $ - $ 11,085,021 $ 5,115,774 5,651,588 59,034 - $ 21,911,417 $ 1,320,000 $ 220,000 4,500,000 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 28,319,999 $ - $ 169,998 1,345,000 $ 220,000 4,612,000 231,582 6,408,582 $ 2,574,002 - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ 540,000 40,000 75,000 655,000 (231,582) $ 25,140,419 - $ 11,085,021 5,115,774 5,651,588 59,034 $ 21,911,417 - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ 1,345,000 220,000 4,612,000 6,177,000 (231,582) $ 28,088,417 $ - $ 2,574,002 $ 13,702,313 $ - $ 13,702,313 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class 650 244 242 246 465 900 LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS NON RECURRING NON PROJECT LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT LIBRARY DISTRICT TECH PHASE II LIBRARY BLDG WHITE TANK All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions TOTAL LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2011 ADOPTED $19,132,030 3,591,685 $22,723,715 $19,134,217 4,476,684 $23,610,901 $19,176,257 368,582 $19,544,839 $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 716,805 500,000 $ 5,540,000 $ 6,040,000 $ 4,060,000 4,060,000 $ - $ 50,000 (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 2,735,160 $ $ $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 500,000 9,600,000 $10,100,000 $ (659,469) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (3,591,685) $ (4,251,154) $ (4,251,154) $ $31,524,526 83 $32,961,712 $ (42,040) 4,108,102 4,066,062 - $ (659,469) (231,582) (3,360,103) (231,582) $ (4,019,572) $28,088,417 $ 4,873,295 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $28,088,417 Property Taxes $20,533,091 73% Fund Balance $2,947,998 10% Intergovernmental & Grants $3,592,843 13% Miscellaneous & Interest $295,135 1% Permits, Fees & Fines $719,350 3% Uses of Funds $28,088,417 Information Technology $2,134,682 7% Administrative Services $2,708,038 10% Public Library Service $23,245,697 83% 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2009 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV VS ADPT VAR % MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 3,422,636 $ 3,422,636 $ 3,607,050 $ 3,607,050 $ 3,869,237 $ 3,869,237 $ 4,230,034 $ 4,230,034 $ 4,504,728 $ 4,504,728 $ 635,491 635,491 16.4% 16.4% FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ $ 424 $ 140,711 141,135 $ 89,065 $ 89,065 $ 89,065 $ 89,065 $ 37,266 $ 52,847 90,113 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ (39,065) (39,065) -43.9% N/A -43.9% GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ $ 20,687,485 $ 20,687,485 $ 20,490,628 $ 20,490,628 $ 20,490,628 $ 20,490,628 $ 20,436,541 $ 20,436,541 $ 20,573,091 $ 20,573,091 $ BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 11,500 $ 11,500 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ 49,010 $ 49,010 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,262,756 $ 24,224,743 $ 24,486,930 $ 24,805,698 $ 25,140,419 $ 653,489 2.7% 5,316,852 5,316,852 18.6% 18.6% 82,463 82,463 (25,400) (25,400) 0.4% 0.4% -66.8% -66.8% USES MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE $ $ 18,281,946 $ 18,281,946 $ 27,125,363 $ 27,125,363 $ 28,562,549 $ 28,562,549 $ 22,618,770 $ 22,618,770 $ 23,245,697 $ 23,245,697 $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ 121,707 $ 254,445 218,898 1,094,638 1,689,688 $ 125,464 $ 476,696 275,168 855,139 35,654 1,768,121 $ 125,464 $ 476,696 275,168 855,139 35,654 1,768,121 $ 121,829 $ 409,236 243,370 848,168 1,622,603 $ 125,126 $ 476,548 340,543 902,841 35,654 1,880,712 $ 338 148 (65,375) (47,702) (112,591) 0.3% 0.0% -23.8% -5.6% 0.0% -6.4% CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 818,357 $ 43,644 862,001 $ 857,945 $ 857,945 $ 857,945 $ 857,945 $ 857,950 $ 35,041 892,991 $ 827,326 $ 827,326 $ 30,619 30,619 3.6% N/A 3.6% BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ $ 449,775 $ 174,319 384,376 330,116 1,338,586 $ 400,710 $ 757,153 346,492 268,742 1,773,097 $ 400,710 $ 757,153 346,492 268,742 1,773,097 $ 336,217 $ 363,231 328,178 344,039 1,371,665 $ 397,929 $ 752,947 553,351 430,455 2,134,682 $ 2,781 4,206 (206,859) (161,713) (361,585) 0.7% 0.6% -59.7% -60.2% -20.4% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 22,172,221 $ 31,524,526 $ 32,961,712 $ 26,506,029 $ 28,088,417 $ $ $ 85 4,873,295 14.8% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2009 ACTUAL CATEGORY TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES $ SUBTOTAL $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES SUBTOTAL $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS 20,107,588 20,107,588 FY 2010 ADOPTED $ $ 75,000 $ 195,720 270,720 $ 2,309,970 2,309,970 $ $ 20,263,686 20,263,686 FY 2010 REVISED $ $ - $ 226,942 226,942 $ 2,828,938 26,000 2,854,938 $ $ 20,263,686 20,263,686 FY 2010 FORECAST $ $ 15,000 $ 226,942 241,942 $ 2,828,938 26,000 2,854,938 $ $ 20,053,624 20,053,624 $ $ - $ 226,942 226,942 $ 3,159,117 49,010 3,208,127 REV VS ADPT VAR % FY 2011 ADOPTED $ $ 20,263,686 20,263,686 $ $ 525,000 3500.0% 42,463 18.7% 567,463 234.5% 3,052,843 $ 3,052,843 $ 223,905 7.9% (26,000) -100.0% 197,905 6.9% 794,022 $ 794,022 $ 654,696 $ 654,696 $ 654,696 $ 654,696 $ 754,170 $ 754,170 $ 719,350 719,350 $ 384,601 $ 395,855 780,456 $ 89,065 $ 135,416 224,481 $ 89,065 $ 382,603 471,668 $ 193,241 $ 369,594 562,835 $ 90,000 $ 205,135 295,135 $ SUBTOTAL $ $ $ ALL REVENUES $ 24,262,756 $ 24,224,743 $ 24,486,930 $ 24,805,698 $ 25,140,419 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,262,756 FY 2009 ACTUAL $ 24,224,743 FY 2010 ADOPTED $ 24,486,930 FY 2010 REVISED $ 24,805,698 FY 2010 FORECAST $ 25,140,419 $ FY 2011 ADOPTED CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ 0.0% 0.0% 540,000 $ 269,405 809,405 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE - 64,654 64,654 935 (177,468) (176,533) 653,489 9.9% 9.9% 1.0% -46.4% -37.4% 2.7% 653,489 2.7% REV VS ADPT VAR % 7,292,068 $ 899,291 2,036 2,450,274 48,341 (115,708) 115,708 10,692,010 $ 7,498,996 $ 1,136,153 2,624,669 32,420 (185,288) 185,290 11,292,240 $ 7,498,996 $ 1,136,153 2,624,669 32,420 (185,288) 185,290 11,292,240 $ 7,346,226 $ 876,110 (92) 2,485,897 14,513 (357,480) 335,227 10,700,401 $ 7,351,979 $ 1,109,975 2,578,261 44,806 (282,315) 282,315 11,085,021 $ 5,371,520 $ 14,202 135,413 5,521,135 $ 4,983,522 $ 18,000 5,001,522 $ 5,060,709 $ 18,000 185,000 5,263,709 $ 4,579,437 $ 18,466 314,888 4,912,791 $ 5,842,774 $ 18,000 600,000 6,460,774 $ 901,715 $ 391,133 630,108 2,789,388 34,254 38,286 249,848 469,908 (7,540) 7,540 5,504,640 $ 403,122 $ 396,188 768,389 3,017,287 71,225 105,145 230,800 567,582 (97,316) 97,316 5,559,738 $ 403,122 $ 396,188 768,389 3,017,287 71,225 105,145 230,800 567,582 (97,316) 97,316 5,559,738 $ 537,967 $ 401,224 949,311 2,521,999 72,235 70,395 213,857 564,222 (145,937) 98,610 5,283,883 $ 754,597 $ 700,110 669,027 2,735,809 49,700 84,800 229,300 648,245 5,871,588 $ (351,475) (303,922) 99,362 281,478 21,525 20,345 1,500 (80,663) (97,316) 97,316 (311,850) -87.2% -76.7% 12.9% 9.3% 30.2% 19.3% 0.6% -14.2% 100.0% 100.0% -5.6% $ - $ 151,004 52,955 250,477 454,436 $ 9,600,000 $ 71,026 9,671,026 $ 10,274,999 $ 500,000 71,026 10,846,025 $ 4,734,463 $ 802,332 72,159 5,608,954 $ 3,700,000 $ 800,000 112,000 59,034 4,671,034 $ 6,574,999 (300,000) (112,000) 11,992 6,174,991 64.0% -60.0% N/A 16.9% 56.9% ALL EXPENDITURES $ 22,172,221 $ 31,524,526 $ 32,961,712 $ 26,506,029 $ 28,088,417 $ 4,873,295 14.8% TOTAL USES $ 22,172,221 $ 31,524,526 $ 32,961,712 $ 26,506,029 $ 28,088,417 $ 4,873,295 14.8% SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ $ $ 86 147,017 26,178 46,408 (12,386) 97,027 (97,025) 207,219 2.0% 2.3% N/A 1.8% -38.2% -52.4% -52.4% 1.8% (782,065) -15.5% 0.0% (415,000) -224.3% (1,197,065) -22.7% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2009 ACTUAL FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST REV VS ADPT VAR % FY 2011 ADOPTED 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ SOURCES $ 21,343,101 $ 21,343,101 $ 21,134,047 $ 21,134,047 $ 21,136,234 $ 210,000 21,346,234 $ 21,181,309 $ 21,181,309 $ 21,750,259 $ 25,000 21,775,259 $ 614,025 (185,000) 429,025 2.9% -88.1% 2.0% $ SOURCES $ 3,904,488 $ 3,904,488 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 4,149,044 $ 4,149,044 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ (1,015,005) (1,015,005) -27.1% -27.1% $ 50,896 $ 7,531,024 7,581,920 $ - $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ - $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ 32,045 $ 3,694,454 3,726,499 $ - $ 861,582 861,582 $ (2,730,103) (2,730,103) N/A -76.0% -76.0% (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ 659,469 3,360,103 4,019,572 -100.0% -93.6% -94.6% FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL FY 2010 ADOPTED SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ 24,140,047 $ 24,224,743 $ 24,226,930 $ 24,702,929 $ 24,485,419 $ 122,709 $ - $ 260,000 $ 102,769 $ 655,000 $ 24,262,756 $ 24,224,743 $ 24,486,930 $ 24,805,698 $ 25,140,419 $ FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED N/A (50,000) -100.0% (50,000) -100.0% 258,489 1.1% 395,000 151.9% 653,489 2.7% REV VS ADPT VAR % 3,040 $ 74,995 78,035 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 50,000 N/A 100.0% 100.0% FUND TOTAL USES $ 18,657,250 $ 7,408,315 26,065,565 $ 19,132,030 $ 3,591,685 22,723,715 $ 19,134,217 $ 4,476,684 23,610,901 $ 17,947,771 $ 4,331,913 22,279,684 $ 19,176,257 $ 368,582 19,544,839 $ (42,040) 4,108,102 4,066,062 -0.2% 91.8% 17.2% $ $ 3,994,835 $ 3,994,835 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,193,035 $ 3,193,035 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 $ 716,805 716,805 20.8% 20.8% $ 2 $ 675,537 675,539 $ - $ 9,600,000 9,600,000 $ - $ 10,100,000 10,100,000 $ - $ 5,284,464 5,284,464 $ - $ 6,040,000 6,040,000 $ 4,060,000 4,060,000 N/A 40.2% 40.2% $ (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) $ (659,469) (3,360,103) (4,019,572) 100.0% 93.6% 94.6% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 21,421,689 $ 750,532 $ 22,172,221 $ 21,924,526 $ 9,600,000 $ 31,524,526 $ 21,926,713 $ 11,034,999 $ 32,961,712 $ 20,481,337 $ 6,024,692 $ 26,506,029 $ 21,911,417 $ 6,177,000 $ 28,088,417 $ 15,296 4,857,999 4,873,295 0.1% 44.0% 14.8% FUND TOTAL USES $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL USES 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ $ 87 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Fund Transfers In SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - IN FY 2010 ADOPTED Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED SPECIAL REVENUE 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Operating Library District (244) Southeast Regional Library District (244) Civic Center Library $ $ 659,469 $ 659,469 $ 435,587 223,882 659,469 $ 659,469 $ 435,587 223,882 659,469 $ 659,469 $ 435,587 223,882 - $ $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 231,582 231,582 231,582 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating Non-Recurring $ 4,251,154 $ 659,469 3,591,685 4,251,154 $ 659,469 3,591,685 4,251,154 $ 659,469 3,591,685 231,582 231,582 ELIMINATIONS Operating Non-Recurring $ (4,251,154) $ (659,469) (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (659,469) (3,591,685) (231,582) (231,582) ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 465 LIBRARY DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Non-Recurring Library District (244) - Fund Transfers Out SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - OUT Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED SPECIAL REVENUE 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT $ 4,251,154 $ 4,251,154 $ 4,251,154 $ 231,582 $ 659,469 $ 659,469 $ 659,469 $ - Library Intergovernmental (246) Southeast Regional 435,587 435,587 435,587 - Library Intergovernmental (246) Civic Center Library 223,882 223,882 223,882 Operating Non-Recurring $ Library District Capital Improvement (465) TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS $ Operating Non-Recurring ELIMINATIONS $ Operating Non-Recurring ALL FUNDS $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 231,582 3,591,685 3,591,685 3,591,685 231,582 4,251,154 $ 4,251,154 $ 4,251,154 $ 231,582 659,469 659,469 659,469 - 3,591,685 3,591,685 3,591,685 231,582 (4,251,154) $ (4,251,154) $ (4,251,154) $ (659,469) (659,469) (659,469) (3,591,685) (3,591,685) (3,591,685) - $ 88 - 3,591,685 $ - $ - $ (231,582) (231,582) - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM / ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER DESKTOP SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2009 ADOPTED FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV TO ADPT VAR % 1.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 16.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 140.96 140.96 170.96 138.96 138.96 167.96 138.96 138.96 167.96 138.96 138.96 167.96 142.73 142.73 171.73 3.77 3.77 3.77 2.7% 2.7% 2.2% FY 2010 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.00 42.72 10.00 1.24 27.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 - FY 2010 REVISED 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.00 42.72 10.00 1.24 27.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 - FY 2010 FORECAST 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.00 46.72 9.00 1.24 25.00 18.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Accounting Specialist Admin/Operations Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Database Administrator Deputy Director Director - Library Executive Assistant Financial Supervisor - Dept Financial Support Supv - Dept Human Resources Analyst Human Resources Specialist Human Resources Supervisor IT Division Manager IT Senior Manager Librarian Library Clerk Library Manager Library Page Library Paraprofessional Library Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Management Analyst Media Specialist Network Engineer Network Engineer - Sr/Ld Office Assistant PC/LAN Tech Support Planner Planner - Facilities FY 2009 ADOPTED 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 35.00 42.72 9.00 1.24 26.00 17.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 - 89 FY 2011 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.00 48.49 9.00 1.24 25.00 19.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 REV TO VAR 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 5.77 (1.00) (2.00) 1.00 (2.00) (2.00) 2.00 ADPT % 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A -100.0% 6.7% 13.5% -10.0% 0.0% -7.4% 5.6% -33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100.0% N/A Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Market Range Title (continued) MARKET RANGE TITLE Systems Admin & Analysis Supv Systems/Network Administrator Systems/Network Admin-Sr/Ld Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer-Sr/Ld Department Total FY 2009 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 170.96 FY 2010 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 167.96 FY 2010 REVISED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 167.96 FY 2010 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 167.96 FY 2011 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 171.73 REV TO ADPT VAR % 0.0% 1.00 N/A (1.00) -100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.77 2.2% FY 2010 REVISED 130.97 36.99 167.96 FY 2010 FORECAST 135.46 32.50 167.96 FY 2011 ADOPTED 140.73 31.00 171.73 REV TO ADPT VAR % 9.76 7.5% (5.99) -16.2% 3.77 2.2% Staffing by Fund FUND 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2009 ADOPTED 129.97 40.99 170.96 FY 2010 ADOPTED 130.97 36.99 167.96 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last thirteen fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2010-11. The tax levy will decrease slightly from FY 2009-10 to FY 2010-11. Due to the decline in property values county-wide, the tax rate will increase from $0.0353 to $0.0412 per $100 of assessed value. Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 Fiscal Year (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy 2001-02 22,913,134 0.0421 9,646,430 2002-03 24,457,047 0.0421 10,182,607 2003-04 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 2004-05 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 2005-06 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 2006-07 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 2007-08 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 2008-09 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 2009-10 57,984,051 0.0353 20,468,370 2010-11 49,707,952 0.0412 20,479,676 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value Vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 $- 0 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Fiscal Year The FY 2010-11 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $20,479,676 a slight increase from the FY 2009-10 adopted levy. As indicated in the table 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2010-11 PROPERTY TAX LEVY LIBRARY DISTRICT Description Net Assessed Value FY 2010-11 Adopted FY 2009-10 Adopted FY 2008-09 Adopted $ 49,707,952,123 $ $ 57,984,051,718 $ $ 58,303,635,287 $ Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1cent Levy 653,895,628 $ 50,361,847,751 $ 642,894,514 $ 58,626,946,232 $ 569,949,948 $ 58,873,585,235 $ Tax Rates 5,036,185 $ 5,862,695 $ 5,887,359 $ SRP Payment in Property Tax Levy Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 0.0412 $ 0.0353 $ 0.0353 $ 20,479,676 $ 20,468,370 $ 20,581,183 $ Total Tax Levy & PILT 269,405 $ 226,942 $ 201,192 $ Levy Limit FY 2011 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. SELF-IMPOSED LEVY LIMIT FY 2011 Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit Maximum Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 22,567,410 0.0454 FY 2011 Secondary Levy (excluding SRP) Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 20,479,676 0.0412 Amount Under Limit: $ 2,087,734 0.0042 9.3% FY 2011 LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY vs. "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" LEVY FY 2011 "Truth-in-Taxation" Secondary Levy $ 21,026,464 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) 0.0423 FY 2011 Secondary Levy Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) $ 20,479,676 0.0412 Amount Under/(Over) "Truth-in-Taxation" Levy $ 546,787 0.0011 FY 2011 Median Residential Full Cash Property Value $ 148,800 "Truth-in-Taxation" Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Property Tax Bill on Median-Valued Home Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ 6.29 6.13 0.16 92 $ 2.6% 2.6% 20,749,081 20,695,312 20,782,375 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District LIBRARY DISTRICT SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY FY 2010 vs. FY 2011 TAX BILL IMPACT ON MEDIAN HOME FY 2010: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill FY 2011: Median Residential Full Cash Property Value Secondary Tax Rate (per $100 Assessed Value) Property Tax Bill Tax Bill Savings/(Increase) $ $ $ 192,000 0.0353 6.78 $ 148,800 0.0412 6.13 $ 0.65 9.5% Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2010-11 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 99.0% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2010-11. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2010-11 Estimated Levy Amount Collections $ 20,479,676 $ 20,263,686 Rate 99% Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements, (IGAs). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. 93 SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2001-02 $ 191,864 2002-03 186,473 2003-04 252,593 2004-05 281,442 2005-06 270,953 2006-07 246,032 2007-08 202,829 2008-09 195,719 2009-10* 226,942 2010-11** 269,405 * Projected Actual ** Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 $ 967,206 $ 967,206 82,940 41,470 24,442 31,567 12,000 12,000 1,742,350 2,000,000 $ 2,828,938 $ 3,052,243 Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Maricopa County Special Healthcare District (automation services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library TOTAL Fines and Forfeits The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart below illustrates the fines collected from FY 2008-09 and the anticipated amount for FY 2009-10 and the budget for FY 2010-11. Fines and Forfeits $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $‐ 2008‐09 2009‐10 Projected 2010‐11 Budget Miscellaneous Revenue The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2008-09 through the FY 2010-11 budget. Miscellaneous Revenue $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $‐ 2008‐09 2009‐10 Projected 2010‐11 Budget Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning Spendable Fund Balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, Library District fund balances are “Restricted”. 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Grants Fund (242) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL Beginning Spendable Fund Balance FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 75,000 $ - $ 50,000 50,000 $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ 50,000 50,000 $ $ - $ $ 3,040 74,995 78,035 $ - Structural Balance $ 71,960 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 3,035 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ $ $ $ $ $ Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 16,257,049 $ 11,429,379 $ 11,429,379 $ 11,534,608 $ 10,436,233 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 21,343,101 $ 21,343,101 $ 21,134,047 $ 21,134,047 $ 21,136,234 210,000 $ 21,346,234 $ 21,181,309 $ 21,181,309 $ 21,750,259 25,000 $ 21,775,259 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 18,657,250 7,408,315 $ 26,065,565 $ 19,132,030 3,591,685 $ 22,723,715 $ 19,134,217 4,476,684 $ 23,610,901 $ 17,947,771 4,331,913 $ 22,279,684 $ 19,176,257 368,582 $ 19,544,839 Structural Balance $ 2,685,851 $ 2,002,017 $ 2,002,017 $ 3,233,538 $ 2,574,002 Accounting Adjustments $ $ $ $ $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted $ 11,534,608 23 - $ 9,839,711 95 - $ 9,164,712 - $ 10,436,233 - $ 12,666,653 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED - $ FY 2010 REVISED (568,641) $ FY 2010 FORECAST Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ 3,904,488 $ 3,904,488 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 4,149,044 $ 4,149,044 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ 3,994,835 $ 3,994,835 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,193,035 $ 3,193,035 $ 2,735,160 $ 2,735,160 Structural Balance $ (90,347) $ $ $ 956,009 $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Unassigned $ - $ (90,347) - $ (270,441) 865,662 - $ 865,662 - 298,200 - $ (270,441) (568,641) $ FY 2011 ADOPTED 298,200 (90,347) $ 865,662 Library District Intergovernmental Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement, which may result in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED $ 7,439,860 $ 7,439,860 $ 6,906,381 $ 5,348,416 50,896 7,531,024 $ 7,581,920 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 3,591,685 $ 32,045 3,694,454 $ 3,726,499 $ $ $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 5,284,464 $ 5,284,464 $ $ 2 675,537 675,539 Structural Balance $ 50,894 $ - $ - $ 32,045 $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted $ 6,906,381 $ 1,431,545 $ 931,545 $ 5,348,416 $ 169,998 Beginning Spendable Fund Balance Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ - $ 96 $ 861,582 861,582 6,040,000 $ 6,040,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants Fund (242) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 15,000 35,000 50,000 15,000 35,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ (50,000) $ (15,000) (35,000) (50,000) (15,000) (35,000) FY 2011 Budget Target $ - $ - FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ - $ N/A - Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Target Summer Reading Grant Walk er Lewis Trusts Sun City Agenda Item: C-65-10-013-M-00 C-65-10-020-D-00 FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Target Summer Reading Grant Walk er Lewis Trusts Sun City Agenda Item: C-65-10-013-M-00 C-65-10-020-D-00 Library District Fund (244) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Panda Exp and Fount Hills Don 21,134,047 $ 2,187 $ 2,187 2,187 2,187 $ 19,134,217 $ 21,136,234 $ - $ - 42,463 42,463 $ (2,187) $ (2,187) $ 19,132,030 $ $ 129,172 103,368 25,804 (84,945) (84,945) - C-65-10-011-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-10-011-M-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA 19,132,030 $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: General Revenues Payments in Lieu of Taxes Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Panda Exp and Fount Hills Don $ (2,187) (2,187) 21,176,510 Agenda Item: $ $ $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 97 $ $ $ $ 19,176,257 $ 0.2% 292,508 292,508 281,241 281,241 21,750,259 2.7% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Fund (244) (continued) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Fairway Branch Libray Donation New Fr of LD Summer Reading SE QC Summer Reading Donation Information and Communications Technology Technology Projects POLARIS Expansion Mesa POLARIS Conversion Supplemental Funding Mid-Year Adjustments Sun City Library Lease - $ 210,000 $ 200,000 5,000 5,000 210,000 200,000 5,000 5,000 $ 386,466 $ 133,816 252,650 - $ 288,533 $ 288,533 - $ 4,476,684 $ 210,000 $ (210,000) $ (200,000) (5,000) (5,000) (210,000) (200,000) (5,000) (5,000) $ (386,466) $ (133,816) (252,650) - $ (288,533) $ (288,533) - $ 3,591,685 $ - $ (3,360,103) $ (3,360,103) - $ 25,000 $ 10,000 15,000 112,000 $ 112,000 25,000 10,000 15,000 - 368,582 $ -89.7% 25,000 C-65-10-012-M-00 C-65-10-014-M-00 C-65-10-015-M-00 C-65-09-011-2-00 C-65-09-014-3-00 C-65-09-010-1-00 Agenda Item: C-65-10-012-M-00 C-65-10-014-M-00 C-65-10-015-M-00 C-65-09-011-2-00 C-65-09-014-3-00 C-65-09-010-1-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Panda Exp and Fount Hills Don Target Summer Reading Grant Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Hybrid Vehicles 3,591,685 $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Donations Fairway Branch Libray Donation New Fr of LD Summer Reading SE QC Summer Reading Donation Information and Communications Technology Technology Projects POLARIS Expansion Mesa POLARIS Conversion Supplemental Funding Mid-Year Adjustments Sun City Library Lease $ Agenda Item: C-65-10-011-M-00 C-65-10-013-M-00 $ $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 112,000 $ 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental Fund (246) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 3,451,965 $ 3,750,165 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 3,451,965 $ 3,750,165 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 3,451,965 $ 3,750,165 $ 27,528 $ 23,364 4,164 (744,333) $ (744,333) (1,015,005) (1,015,005) 2,735,160 $ -20.8% 2,735,160 -27.1% Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Retirement Contributions Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ - $ 3,591,685 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ - $ 3,591,685 FY 2011 Budget Target $ - $ 3,591,685 $ - $ - $ - 90,000 90,000 (3,360,103) (3,360,103) - $ 321,582 -91.0% Revenue Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Capital Improvement Program Transfer to Capital Proj Fund Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Expenditures CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 9,600,000 $ - FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 9,600,000 $ - FY 2011 Budget Target $ 9,600,000 $ - $ (4,060,000) $ (4,060,000) 540,000 540,000 $ 5,540,000 $ -42.3% 540,000 N/A Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 99 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) (continued) Expenditures Revenue TECHNOLOGY FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Information and Communications Technology Technology Projects Library Dist Tech Phase 2 - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 - $ 500,000 $ - $ (500,000) $ (500,000) - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 - $ 500,000 $ N/A - C-65-10-004-M-00 Agenda Item: C-65-10-004-M-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Prog Adj - $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Information and Communications Technology Technology Projects Library Dist Tech Phase 2 $ Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 100 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Capital Improvement Program Summary A Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) was established in FY 2008-09 to track the expenditure of capital project spending by the Library District. Project Detail A total of two capital projects are identified by the Library District Board of Directors. Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Funding Source Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY14-15 Total Project White Tanks Branch $ 675,537 $ 4,784,463 $ 5,540,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,540,000 $ 11,000,000 Technology Infrastructure - Phase 2 500,000 500,000 500,000 Project Total $ 675,537 $ 4,784,463 $ 6,040,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,040,000 $ 11,500,000 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Building – White Tank Branch Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Scheduled Completion Date: White Tank Regional Park Entrance, North side of White Tank Mountain Rd. 4 Library District Federal ARRA funding through EECBG September 2010 Project Description The building is being built by the Maricopa County Library District, who will own the facility, and is leasing the land from the Maricopa County Parks & Recreation Department. The 29,000 square-foot facility will be shared by the Maricopa County Library District and Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department. 4,500 square-feet of the facility have been designated for use as the Nature Center which will provide displays, exhibits and programs about native vegetation, animals in the park area as well as providing meeting rooms for public use and evening programs. The library faces southeast and has floor to ceiling windows that will face northwest for unabated, majestic views of the White Tank Mountains. The library will have capacity for 44 public use computers and will have capacity to house almost 45,000 units of materials. It will be a Wi-Fi compatible facility so customers can access the Internet with their own laptops. The Children’s Story time room will seat 137. There will also be a Teen Oasis designated area; four study rooms; Café/coffee shop and Friends of the Library bookshop. It will utilize the Dewey-less design with materials sorted into “neighborhoods” much like a bookstore for easy access and will use smart-check sorting. This project is expected to have created approximately 300 construction jobs in various trades. Purpose Statement The purpose of the White Tank Branch Library & Nature Center project is to provide public library programs and services along with a Parks Nature Center to county residents so that their recreation reading and viewing needs, requests for programs and information, and quality of life is enhanced. 102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Strategic Goals Addressed Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Strategic Plan Program and Activity Supported Public Library Service Result Measures RESULT MEASURE FY 2009-10 Year-To-Date Actual Percent of customers who report that the Library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Survey underway FY 2009-10 Year-End Projected 93.0% Projected with Capital Improvement 93.0% Funding/Cost Summary Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Funding Source Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY14-15 Total Project Library District Capital Project Fund 465 $ 675,537 $ 4,784,463 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 10,460,000 ARRA - EECBG Funding 540,000 540,000 540,000 Project Total $ 675,537 $ 4,784,463 $ 5,540,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,540,000 $ 11,000,000 Operating Cost Summary The department will operate the new library within the current operating budget. 103 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Technology Infrastructure Phase 2 Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Scheduled Completion Date: All District Branches All Library District None June 2011 Project Description The Library District Technology Infrastructure Phase 2 project will increase the capacity and the security of the District’s network in order to meet the growing demand in library use. It will also give the District complete redundancy at the backup site and move the main District Network Site to a server farm that has complete duplication of services, which protects the District’s information in the event of a catastrophic shutdown of communication, power, etc. The increase in capacity is also required to be able to run the Library Information System for multiple major client libraries coming onboard by the end of FY 2010-11. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Library District Technology Infrastructure Phase 2 project is to expand capacity of the network and create total redundancy for the District network for our customers and the client libraries within Maricopa County for whom we provide library services. Strategic Goals Addressed Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Strategic Plan Program and Activity Supported Public Library Service Result Measures RESULT MEASURE FY 2009-10 Year-To-Date Actual Percent of customers who report that the Library's collection of books and other materials meets their needs Survey underway FY 2009-10 Year-End Projected Projected with Capital Improvement 93.0% 93.0% Funding/Cost Summary Previous Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5-Year Total Funding Source Actuals FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY14-15 Total Project Library District Capital Project Fund $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Project Total $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Operating Cost Summary The department will operate the new library within the current operating budget. 104 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Motion Approve the Stadium District FY 2011 Budget in the amount of $10,467,950 by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Stadium District. This amount represents no net change from the Tentative Adopted budget of $10,467,950 Also, pursuant to A.R.S. §48-252, submit a copy of the Stadium District’s FY 2011 Final Budget to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Maricopa County Treasurer, and pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4232 submit a copy of the Stadium District FY 2011 Final Budget to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 105 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Don Stapley, Chairman, District 2 Fulton Brock, District 1 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s Recommended expenditure budget for FY 2010-11 is $10,467,950. Included in this amount is $2.1 million for the Chase Field Party Suite Renovations. The Recommended revenue budget is $10,095,578. Chase Field is now entering its 13th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility and the strategic goal of generating on-going revenue, the District began the Roof Coating and Party Suites Renovation projects in FY 2009-10. These projects will be completed in FY 2010-11. Under the Agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks, the District will receive 10% of the party suites Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Cactus League by Fiscal Year premium upon completion of the $6,500,000 $6,493,520 renovation. $6,286,155 Revenue $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $5,304,567 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,321,877 $4,321,745 FY 10 Forecasted FY 11 Adopted $4,000,000 FY 07 Actual FY 08 Actual FY 09 Actual Fiscal Year Car Rental Surcharge revenues have been decreasing and fund balance will be used to cover the debt service payment on the Cactus League bonds. This decrease in revenue will also require the use of fund balance for Cactus League operations which are normally funded with the car rental surcharge revenue. In addition, because there is no excess car rental surcharge revenue, there will be no funding turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in FY 2010-11. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager Note: No Changes from Recommended 107 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District 108 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis Lauren M Cochran, Management & Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals • By June, 2013, completion of preventive maintenance will increase by 10% from 80% to 90% of items that are scheduled for the Stadium to maintain the facility for the safety and convenience of the attendees. Status: New in FY 2010-11. • By June, 2013, the number of District events held at the ballpark will increase by 5% from 108 to 113 non-baseball events. Status: New in FY 2010-11. • By June, 2014, increase the number of major league baseball spring training facilities by 20% from 9 to 11 spring training facilities. Status: New in FY 2010-11. • By June, 2014, the District will increase facility revenue from $600,000 to $630,000 by 5% for non-baseball events to provide resources to ensure that Chase Field is a wellmaintained, state-of-the-art facility. Status: New in FY 2010-11. 109 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Budget Summary Consolidated Sources, Uses and Fund Balance by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE DEBT SERVICE $ 10,600,522 $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ LICENSES AND PERMITS OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES - $ 3,172,991 1,196,092 99,750 4,468,833 $ $ $ 2,097,500 2,097,500 $ $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 6,566,333 $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 9,224,780 $ 4,321,745 $ 300,000 1,179,241 5,800,986 $ - $ - $ 5,800,986 $ USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 368,981 $ 5,930 1,377,484 3,720 2,787,111 4,543,226 $ - $ 1,250 6,610,085 6,611,335 $ NON-RECURRING SERVICES $ OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ 2,097,500 $ 2,097,500 $ - $ - $ TOTAL USES $ 6,640,726 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ (74,393) $ ENDING FUND BALANCE: RESTRICTED $ 10,526,129 $ 6,611,335 SUBTOTAL 9,918,465 ELIMINATIONS $ 29,743,767 $ - TOTAL $ 29,743,767 - $ 4,321,745 $ - $ 4,321,745 3,172,991 3,172,991 1,196,092 1,196,092 5,000 404,750 404,750 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,607,870 2,787,111 (2,787,111) 2,612,870 $ 12,882,689 $ (2,787,111) $ 10,095,578 - $ - $ 2,612,870 2,097,500 2,097,500 $ (2,097,500) $ (2,097,500) $ 14,980,189 $ (4,884,611) $ $ $ 10,095,578 - $ 368,981 $ - $ 5,930 3,000 1,381,734 6,613,805 2,787,111 (2,787,111) 3,000 $ 11,157,561 $ (2,787,111) $ - $ 2,097,500 2,097,500 $ - 2,097,500 $ - $ 2,097,500 (2,097,500) 4,195,000 $ (2,097,500) $ 368,981 5,930 1,381,734 6,613,805 8,370,450 2,097,500 2,097,500 $ 2,100,500 $ 15,352,561 $ (4,884,611) $ 10,467,950 (810,349) $ 2,609,870 $ 8,414,431 110 1,725,128 $ - $ 1,725,128 $ 10,430,835 $ 29,371,395 $ - $ 29,371,395 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Expenditures and Other Uses by Department, Fund and Function Class FY 2010 ADOPTED 680 250 253 370 450 900 STADIUM DISTRICT CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT All Functions STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON RECURRING NON PROJECT BALLPARK SUITE RENOVATION All Functions ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING All Functions TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT $ 482,143 $ FY 2010 REVISED FY 2011 ADOPTED 482,143 $ (INC.)/DEC FROM REV. 99,143 $ 383,000 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,571,351 $ 4,444,083 $ 2,200,000 2,097,500 $ 4,506,391 $ 6,771,351 $ 6,541,583 $ 127,268 102,500 229,768 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,611,335 $ 313,759 $ $ 3,000 $ 2,097,500 $ 2,100,500 $ 102,500 102,500 3,000 $ 3,000 2,200,000 1,800,000 $ 1,803,000 $ 2,203,000 $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,200,000) (2,097,500) $ (3,161,264) $ (5,361,264) $ (4,884,611) $ $ 10,555,364 $ 11,020,324 111 $10,467,950 $ (374,153) (102,500) (476,653) 552,374 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $10,467,950 Sales Taxes $4,321,745 41% Miscellaneous & Interest $5,773,833 55% Fund Balance $372,372 4% Uses of Funds $10,467,950 Administrative Services $155,912 1% Stadium Operations $4,781,944 46% Cactus League Support $5,530,094 53% 112 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2009 ACTUAL PROGRAM / ACTIVITY SOURCES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ (2,317,367) $ $ (2,317,367) $ FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV VS ADPT VAR % 6,525,046 $ 5,949,844 $ 5,949,844 $ 4,670,563 $ 4,646,495 $ (1,303,349) 7,360,568 5,566,391 5,631,351 5,475,283 5,449,083 (182,268) $ 13,885,614 $ 11,516,235 $ 11,581,195 $ 10,145,846 $ 10,095,578 $ (1,485,617) - $ - $ - $ - $ 64,111 $ 64,111 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 11,568,247 $ 11,516,235 $ 11,581,195 $ 10,209,957 $ 10,095,578 $ (1,485,617) -21.9% -3.2% -12.8% N/A N/A -12.8% USES CACT - CACTUS LEAGUE SUPPORT STOP - STADIUM OPERATIONS 68SD - STADIUM DISTRICT $ 6,951,740 $ 5,913,370 $ 5,913,370 $ $ 6,090,641 $ 4,379,230 $ 4,844,190 $ $ 13,042,381 $ 10,292,600 $ 10,757,560 $ BDGT - BUDGETING FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $ CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 5,521,830 $ 5,530,094 $ 2,498,803 $ 4,781,944 $ 8,020,633 $ 10,312,038 $ 8,737 $ 14,117 52,883 149,113 224,850 $ 14,494 $ 20,052 34,914 160,354 229,814 $ 14,494 $ 20,052 34,914 160,354 229,814 $ 9,355 $ 9,056 47,739 152,511 218,661 $ 18,170 $ 16,033 38,221 31,066 103,490 $ 37,512 $ (2,517,876) 1,995 $ (2,478,369) $ 31,921 $ 1,029 32,950 $ 31,921 $ 1,029 32,950 $ 31,922 $ 1,300 33,222 $ 40,967 $ 11,455 52,422 $ $ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 10,788,862 $ 10,555,364 $ 11,020,324 $ 113 8,272,516 $ 10,467,950 $ 383,276 62,246 445,522 (3,676) 4,019 (3,307) 129,288 126,324 6.5% 1.3% 4.1% -25.4% 20.0% -9.5% 80.6% 55.0% (9,046) -28.3% N/A (10,426) -1013.2% (19,472) -59.1% 552,374 5.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2009 ACTUAL $ 5,304,567 SUBTOTAL $ 5,304,567 FY 2010 ADOPTED $ 5,450,000 $ 5,450,000 FY 2010 FY 2010 REVISED FORECAST $ 5,450,000 $ 4,321,877 $ 5,450,000 $ 4,321,877 FY 2011 ADOPTED $ 4,321,745 $ 4,321,745 REV VS ADPT VAR % $(1,128,255) -20.7% $(1,128,255) -20.7% $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ 3,172,991 $ 3,172,991 $ 3,172,991 $ 3,172,991 N/A N/A CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ 1,196,092 $ 1,196,092 $ 1,196,092 $ 1,196,092 N/A N/A CATEGORY 0606 - SALES TAXES LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ 644,830 $ 634,844 $ 634,844 $ 452,696 $ 404,750 5,618,850 5,431,391 5,496,351 5,435,384 1,000,000 SUBTOTAL $ 6,263,680 $ 6,066,235 $ 6,131,195 $ 5,888,080 $ 1,404,750 ALL REVENUES $11,568,247 $11,516,235 $11,581,195 $ 10,209,957 TOTAL SOURCES $11,568,247 $11,516,235 $11,581,195 $ 10,209,957 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $10,095,578 $ (230,094) (4,496,351) $(4,726,445) -36.2% -81.8% -77.1% $(1,485,617) -12.8% $10,095,578 $(1,485,617) -12.8% FY 2011 REV VS ADPT ADOPTED VAR % 249,271 $ 1,328 62,340 927 (11,075) 11,075 313,866 $ 288,444 $ 8,455 74,426 (11,416) 11,416 371,325 $ 288,444 $ 8,455 74,426 (11,416) 11,416 371,325 $ 278,663 $ 3,061 459 71,038 376 (11,416) 11,416 353,597 $ 284,773 $ 9,084 75,124 (11,354) 11,354 368,981 $ 5,482 $ 5,482 $ 3,430 $ 2,500 5,930 $ 3,430 $ 2,500 5,930 $ 2,647 $ 2,500 5,147 $ 3,430 $ 2,500 5,930 $ $ 25,100 $ 75,298 $ 75,298 $ 441,556 759,023 759,023 1,054 1,606 1,606 1,421 2,201,421 1,116,766 911,612 976,572 12,713 3,419 3,419 1,059 3,850 3,850 5,830 5,550 5,550 150 400 400 104 875 875 $ 1,604,332 $ 1,763,054 $ 4,028,014 $ $ 3,671 (629) (698) (62) 62 2,344 1.3% -7.4% N/A -0.9% N/A 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75,298 $ 575,417 484 103,421 539,848 2,003 2,549 4,891 183 373 1,304,467 $ 65,000 $ 10,298 727,619 31,404 1,606 2,098,921 102,500 575,335 401,237 1,684 1,735 3,850 5,550 400 875 3,479,234 $ 548,780 13.7% 4.1% 100.0% 4.7% 41.1% 50.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.6% $ 3,043,094 $ 1,800,000 $ - $ 5,822,088 6,615,055 6,615,055 $ 8,865,182 $ 8,415,055 $ 6,615,055 $ - $ 6,609,305 6,609,305 $ - $ 6,613,805 6,613,805 $ ALL EXPENDITURES $ 10,788,862 $ 10,555,364 $ 11,020,324 $ TOTAL USES $ 10,788,862 $ 10,555,364 $ 11,020,324 $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES SUBTOTAL CAPITAL 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL 114 1,250 1,250 N/A 0.0% 0.0% 8,272,516 $ 10,467,950 $ 552,374 5.0% 8,272,516 $ 10,467,950 $ 552,374 5.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV VS ADPT VAR % $ SOURCES $ 882,283 $ 882,283 $ 517,750 $ 517,750 $ 517,750 $ 517,750 $ 34,145 $ 34,145 $ 24,750 $ 24,750 $ (493,000) (493,000) -95.2% -95.2% $ SOURCES $ 4,572,704 $ 4,572,704 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,571,351 $ 2,200,000 6,771,351 $ 4,481,960 $ 102,500 4,584,460 $ 4,444,083 $ 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ (127,268) (102,500) (229,768) -2.8% -4.7% -3.4% $ SOURCES $ 5,715,002 $ 5,715,002 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 5,657,642 $ 5,657,642 $ 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 $ (1,124,108) (1,124,108) -16.2% -16.2% $ 2,915,548 $ 586 2,916,134 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,514,259 $ (152) 2,514,107 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,612,870 $ (115,394) (115,394) -4.2% N/A -4.2% (2,517,876) $ (2,517,876) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (2,200,000) (5,361,264) $ (2,477,897) $ (102,500) (2,580,397) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,097,500) (4,884,611) $ 374,153 102,500 476,653 -11.8% -4.7% -8.9% SOURCES $ $ SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL SOURCES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ FUND / FUNCTION CLASS 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FY 2010 ADOPTED 11,567,661 $ 11,516,235 $ 11,581,195 $ 10,210,109 $ 10,095,578 $ 586 $ - $ - $ (152) $ - $ 11,568,247 $ 11,516,235 $ 11,581,195 $ 10,209,957 $ 10,095,578 $ FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED (1,485,617) -12.8% N/A (1,485,617) -12.8% REV VS ADPT VAR % $ FUND TOTAL USES $ 720,077 $ 720,077 $ 482,143 $ 482,143 $ 482,143 $ 482,143 $ 96,356 $ 96,356 $ 99,143 $ 99,143 $ 383,000 383,000 79.4% 79.4% $ USES $ 3,324,329 $ 3,324,329 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,571,351 $ 2,200,000 6,771,351 $ 4,122,713 $ 102,500 4,225,213 $ 4,444,083 $ 2,097,500 6,541,583 $ 127,268 102,500 229,768 2.8% 4.7% 3.4% $ USES $ 6,232,990 $ 6,232,990 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,426,344 $ 6,426,344 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 $ 313,759 313,759 4.5% 4.5% $ 2,786 $ 3,026,556 3,029,342 $ 3,000 $ 1,800,000 1,803,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,200,000 2,203,000 $ 2,500 $ 102,500 105,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,097,500 2,100,500 $ 102,500 102,500 0.0% 4.7% 4.7% USES $ (2,517,876) $ (2,517,876) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (2,200,000) (5,361,264) $ (2,477,897) $ (102,500) (2,580,397) $ (2,787,111) $ (2,097,500) (4,884,611) $ (374,153) (102,500) (476,653) 11.8% 4.7% 8.9% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 7,762,306 $ 3,026,556 $ 10,788,862 $ 8,755,364 $ 1,800,000 $ 10,555,364 $ 8,820,324 $ 2,200,000 $ 11,020,324 $ 8,170,016 $ 102,500 $ 8,272,516 $ 8,370,450 $ 2,097,500 $ 10,467,950 $ 449,874 102,500 552,374 5.1% 4.7% 5.0% 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ $ 115 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers In SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - IN FY 2010 ADOPTED Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED SPECIAL REVENUE 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS Operating Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) $ $ 493,000 $ 493,000 $ 493,000 493,000 $ 493,000 $ 493,000 - $ - $ ‐ ‐ 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS Non-Recurring Long Term Project Reserve (450) $ $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 102,500 $ 102,500 $ 102,500 2,097,500 2,097,500 2,097,500 $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 1,179,241 1,179,241 1,179,241 $ $ 1,668,264 $ 1,668,264 $ 1,668,264 1,668,264 $ 1,668,264 $ 1,668,264 1,477,897 $ 1,477,897 $ 1,477,897 1,607,870 1,607,870 1,607,870 TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS Operating Non-Recurring $ 3,161,264 $ 3,161,264 - 5,361,264 $ 3,161,264 2,200,000 2,580,397 $ 2,477,897 102,500 4,884,611 2,787,111 2,097,500 ELIMINATIONS Operating Non-Recurring $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) - (5,361,264) $ (3,161,264) (2,200,000) (2,580,397) $ (2,477,897) (102,500) (4,884,611) (2,787,111) (2,097,500) ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ DEBT SERVICE 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERIES 02 Operating Ballpark Operations (253) CAPITAL PROJECTS 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE Operating Ballpark Operations (253) 116 - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fund Transfers Out SUMMARY OF FUND TRANSFERS - OUT Fund/Function/Transfer FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 ADOPTED REVISED FORECAST ADOPTED SPECIAL REVENUE 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS $ 2,668,264 $ 2,668,264 $ 2,477,897 $ 2,787,111 $ 2,668,264 $ 2,668,264 $ 2,477,897 $ 2,787,111 Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,179,241 Long Term Project Reserve (450) 1,668,264 1,668,264 1,477,897 1,607,870 Operating DEBT SERVICE 370 STADIUM DISTRICT DEBT SERIES 02 Operating $ 493,000 $ 493,000 $ - $ - $ 493,000 $ 493,000 $ - $ - 493,000 493,000 - - Cactus League Operations (250) CAPITAL PROJECTS 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE Non-Recurring $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 102,500 $ 2,097,500 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 102,500 $ 2,097,500 - 2,200,000 102,500 2,097,500 Ballpark Operations (253) TOTAL BEFORE ELIMINATIONS $ Operating Non-Recurring ELIMINATIONS $ Operating 5,361,264 $ 2,580,397 $ 4,884,611 3,161,264 2,477,897 2,787,111 - 2,200,000 102,500 2,097,500 (3,161,264) $ (5,361,264) $ (2,580,397) $ (4,884,611) (3,161,264) (3,161,264) (2,477,897) (2,787,111) (2,200,000) (102,500) (2,097,500) Non-Recurring ALL FUNDS 3,161,264 $ 3,161,264 $ - $ 117 - $ - $ - Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Program and Activity PROGRAM / ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL STADIUM DISTRICT STADIUM OPERATIONS PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2009 ADOPTED FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED REV TO ADPT VAR % 0.30 2.10 0.30 0.30 3.00 0.20 2.00 0.40 0.30 2.90 0.20 2.00 0.40 0.30 2.90 0.20 2.00 0.40 0.30 2.90 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.40 1.25 0.05 (1.70) (0.10) 0.10 (1.65) 25.0% -85.0% -25.0% 33.3% -56.9% 2.00 2.00 5.00 2.10 2.10 5.00 2.10 2.10 5.00 2.10 2.10 5.00 3.75 3.75 5.00 1.65 1.65 - 78.6% 78.6% 0.0% Staffing by Market Range Title MARKET RANGE TITLE Accountant Director - Stadium District Executive Assistant Finan/Business Analyst - Dept Office Assistant Program Coordinator Project Manager Department Total FY 2009 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2010 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2010 REVISED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2010 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2011 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 REV TO ADPT VAR % N/A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% FY 2011 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 REV TO ADPT VAR % 0.0% 0.0% Staffing By Fund FUND 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2009 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2010 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2010 REVISED 5.00 5.00 FY 2010 FORECAST 5.00 5.00 General Adjustments Operating Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Increase Regular Benefits in the amount of $2,587 for employee health and dental premium increase. • Increase Regular Benefits by $1,313 for the FY 2010-11 retirement contribution rate increase. • Right size Worker’s Compensation charges with an increase of $179 in expenditures. Strategic Business Plan Update The Stadium District underwent a comprehensive facilitated review of their strategic plan. Major changes to their structure and measures were made. The Event Management and Financial Management Programs were deleted, as were their related activities. In their place, the District implemented the Stadium District Program. Within this program are the Cactus League Support Activity and the Stadium Operations Activity. These Activities and their resulting measures reflect the work of the department and the customer to whom services are provided. 118 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Programs and Activities Stadium District Program The purpose of the Stadium District Program is to provide facilities and events to communities, residents and visitors so they can enjoy the benefits of baseball games and other events. Program Results Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year REV VS ADPT VAR % N/A N/A FY 2009 ACTUAL N/A FY 2010 REVISED N/A FY 2011 ADOPTED 100.0% N/A N/A 95.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0% N/A N/A Activities that comprise this program include: • Cactus League Support • Stadium Operations Cactus League Support Activity The purpose of the Cactus League Activity is to provide spring training facilities to Maricopa County communities so they can enjoy the economic benefit resulting from games and events. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Measure Description Percent change in economic benefit from Cactus League over prior year Number of existing spring training facilities in Maricopa County for the current Fiscal Year Number of existing and planned spring training facilities for the current Fiscal Year Cost per existing spring training facility in Maricopa County for the current fiscal year FY 2009 ACTUAL N/A FY 2010 REVISED N/A FY 2011 ADOPTED 5.0% N/A N/A 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 553,009.40 N/A N/A -95.2% -22.0% -100.0% -21.9% REV VS ADPT VAR % N/A N/A Revenue 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 810,458 5,714,588 $ 6,525,046 $ 517,750 $ 24,750 5,925,094 4,621,745 (493,000) $ 5,949,844 $ 4,646,495 $ (493,000) (1,303,349) 493,000 $ (1,303,349) 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ $ Expenditure 718,750 6,232,990 $ 6,951,740 481,276 $ 98,000 5,925,094 5,432,094 (493,000) $ 5,913,370 $ 5,530,094 $ 383,276 493,000 (493,000) 383,276 79.6% 8.3% 100.0% 6.5% Operating Adjustments: Cactus League Operations Fund (250) • Decrease Transfers In from the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) by $493,000 due to low interest earnings and reduced collection of the car rental surcharge. 119 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District • Due to reduced revenues, delete the payment to the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority for a savings of ($382,724) from the FY 2009-10 budgeted level. Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) • Reduce revenues $1,303,349 due to low interest earnings and reduced collection of the car rental surcharge. • Delete the Transfer Out to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) for operations and payments to the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, resulting in a reduction of $493,000 from the FY 2009-10 budget. Eliminations Fund (900) • Right-size eliminations by $493,000 due to the change in fund transfers. Activity Narrative: The Activity measures are new this fiscal year thus not allowing for a historical comparison. Due to a decline in the car rental surcharge revenue, the payment to the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority has been removed from the budget. Due to the decline in revenue, the Cactus League Operations Fund (253) and the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) be out of structural balance by $74,393 and $810,349, respectively. Each fund’s balance is sufficient to absorb these operating costs in FY 2010-11. Stadium Operations Activity The purpose of the Stadium Operations Activity is to provide Stadium events, capital improvement projects and a well-maintained facility to attendees so they can attend and enjoy events in an up-todate well maintained facility. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Measure Type Result Result Output Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description Percent of routine maintenance items completed on schedule during current fiscal year Percent of event attendees reporting that they are satisfied with facility during the current fiscal year Number of total routine maintenance items scheduled for the current fiscal year Number of attendees at all events for the current Fiscal Year Number of expected attendees at events for the current fiscal year Cost per attendee for the current fiscal year FY 2009 ACTUAL N/A FY 2010 REVISED N/A FY 2011 ADOPTED 100.0% N/A N/A 95.0% N/A N/A N/A REV VS ADPT VAR % N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 N/A N/A N/A 2,264,472 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,264,472 N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 2.11 N/A N/A 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 4,445,997 2,914,571 $ 7,360,568 $ 6,771,351 $ 6,541,583 $ 1,000,000 1,179,241 2,728,264 2,612,870 (4,868,264) (4,884,611) $ 5,631,351 $ 5,449,083 $ (229,768) 179,241 (115,394) (16,347) (182,268) -3.4% 17.9% -4.2% 0.3% -3.2% 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES 2002 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES $ 3,061,299 3,029,342 $ 6,090,641 $ 6,509,454 $ 6,386,814 $ 1,000,000 1,179,241 2,203,000 2,100,500 (4,868,264) (4,884,611) $ 4,844,190 $ 4,781,944 $ 122,640 (179,241) 102,500 16,347 62,246 1.9% -17.9% 4.7% -0.3% 1.3% Expenditure 120 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Operating Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Decrease revenues $127,268 due to lower event attendance and decreased Diamondbacks ticket prices. • Increase Transfers Out to the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) by $179,241 to provide funding for repayment of the suite renovation loan from the team. • Decrease Transfers Out to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) by $60,394 due to a reduction in net revenue as a result of the current economic climate. • Reduce expenditures $250,194 from the FY 2009-10 budgeted level to maintain structural balance. Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) • Increase revenues and expenditure for the Transfer In and the subsequent payment of $179,241 to the Diamondbacks out of debt service for the Party Suited Renovation Phase 1 loan. Long Term Capital Reserve Fund (450) • Decrease revenues $115,394 due to a reduction in expected interest revenue of $55,000 and a reduction in Transfers In from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) of $60,394. Eliminations Fund (900) • Right-size eliminations by ($118,847) due to the changes to the transfers in and out. Non Recurring Adjustments: Ballpark Operations Fund (253) • Increase revenue and expenditures $2,097,500 for the Roof Tile Replacement Project and the Suite Renovation Project. Long Term Capital Reserve Fund (450) • Increase expenditures $2,097,500 for a transfer out to the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) for the Roof Tile Replacement Project and the Suite Renovation Project. Eliminations Fund (900) • Right-size eliminations by ($2,097,500) to match the transfers in and out related to the Roof Tile Replacement Project and the Suite Renovation project. Activity Narrative: The activity measures are new this fiscal year thus not allowing for a historical comparison. 121 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax The Car Rental Surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Tourism and Sport Authority (AZTSA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Licenses and Permits Stadium District Car Rental Surcharge Fiscal Annual Growth Year Collections Rate 2001-02 $ 5,536,163 -1.8% 2002-03 4,865,038 -12.1% 2003-04 5,556,717 14.2% 2004-05 6,024,416 8.4% 2005-06 6,498,814 7.9% 2006-07 6,288,093 -3.2% 2007-08 6,132,465 -2.5% 2008-09 5,304,567 -13.5% 2009-10* 4,321,877 -18.5% 2010-11** 4,321,745 0.0% * Forecasted ** Budgeted The Stadium District receives revenue for naming rights, intellectual property rights and commissions on suite rental which it classifies as License and Permit revenue. In addition, there are receipts under agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization that fall into this category. Other Charges for Service The Stadium District classifies revenues from the booking manager for events, parking charges, and reimbursements for security services as Other Charges for Service. The Stadium District also receives a fee from Northwind related to the utilization of the District’s cooling system which is included as Other Charges for Service. Miscellaneous Revenue The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include certain receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization and interest earnings. . Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources solely comprise Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds will be utilized to maintain and improve the facility. In addition, transfers from Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to Stadium District Debt Series 122 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District 02 Fund (370) will be made for repayments of loans used for projects and renovations. As discussed previously, the decline in revenue expected in FY 2010-11 will result in no net revenue being paid to the AZSTA. For further detail on Fund Transfers, refer to the Fund Transfer section earlier in this document. Fund Balance Summary and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2009-10. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 3,151,957 $ 3,235,882 $ 3,235,882 $ 3,314,176 $ 3,251,965 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 882,283 882,283 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 34,145 34,145 $ $ 24,750 24,750 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 720,077 720,077 $ $ 482,143 482,143 $ $ 482,143 482,143 $ $ 96,356 96,356 $ $ 99,143 99,143 Structural Balance $ 162,206 $ 35,607 $ 35,607 $ Accounting Adjustments $ 13 $ - $ - $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ 3,314,176 $ 3,314,176 $ 3,271,489 $ 3,271,489 123 $ 3,271,489 $ 3,271,489 (62,211) $ - $ 3,251,965 $ 3,251,965 $ (74,393) - $ 3,177,572 $ 3,177,572 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 5,740,934 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 $ 6,989,310 $ 7,348,557 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 4,572,704 $ 4,572,704 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,571,351 2,200,000 $ 6,771,351 $ 4,481,960 102,500 $ 4,584,460 $ 4,444,083 2,097,500 $ 6,541,583 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 3,324,329 $ 3,324,329 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 $ 4,571,351 2,200,000 $ 6,771,351 $ 4,122,713 102,500 $ 4,225,213 $ 4,444,083 2,097,500 $ 6,541,583 Structural Balance $ 1,248,375 $ - $ - $ 359,247 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ 6,989,310 $ 6,989,310 1 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,348,557 $ 7,348,557 $ 7,348,557 $ 7,348,557 Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 10,511,470 $ 10,478,379 $ 10,478,379 $ 9,993,482 $ 9,224,780 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ 5,715,002 $ 5,715,002 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 5,657,642 $ 5,657,642 $ 5,800,986 $ 5,800,986 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ 6,232,990 $ 6,232,990 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ 6,426,344 $ 6,426,344 $ 6,611,335 $ 6,611,335 Structural Balance $ $ $ Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ 9,993,482 $ 9,993,482 (517,988) $ - $ 10,478,379 $ 10,478,379 124 - $ 10,478,379 $ 10,478,379 (768,702) $ $ 9,224,780 $ 9,224,780 (810,349) $ 8,414,431 $ 8,414,431 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2009 ACTUAL FY 2010 ADOPTED FY 2010 REVISED FY 2010 FORECAST FY 2011 ADOPTED Beginning Spendable Fund Balance $ 7,622,566 $ 6,790,360 $ 6,790,360 $ 7,509,358 $ 9,918,465 Sources: Operating Non-Recurring Total Sources: $ 2,915,548 586 $ 2,916,134 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,728,264 $ 2,514,259 $ 2,612,870 (152) $ 2,514,107 $ 2,612,870 $ 2,786 3,026,556 $ 3,029,342 $ 3,000 1,800,000 $ 1,803,000 $ 3,000 2,200,000 $ 2,203,000 $ Structural Balance $ 2,912,762 $ 2,725,264 $ 2,725,264 $ 2,511,759 $ 2,609,870 Ending Spendable Fund Balance: Restricted Total Ending Spendable Fund Balance $ 7,509,358 $ 7,509,358 $ 7,715,624 $ 7,715,624 $ 7,315,624 $ 7,315,624 $ 9,918,465 $ 9,918,465 $ 10,430,835 $ 10,430,835 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 2,500 102,500 105,000 $ $ 3,000 2,097,500 $ 2,100,500 Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 482,143 $ 517,750 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 482,143 $ 517,750 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 482,143 $ 517,750 $ (276) $ (276) (493,000) - - (493,000) Adjustments: Base Adjustments Other Base Adjustments Right size personnel allocation Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Other IGA Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 125 (276) $ (382,724) $ (382,724) - $ 99,143 $ -79.4% 24,750 -95.2% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 $ 64,960 $ 64,960 64,960 64,960 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 4,571,351 $ 4,571,351 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 4,571,351 $ 4,571,351 $ 3,900 $ 2,587 1,313 119,026 $ 179 179,241 (60,394) - $ (250,194) Adjustments: Grants, Donations and Intergovernmental Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements Stadium Law Enforcement IGA Adjustments: Employee Compensation and Benefits Employee Retirement and Benefits Employee Health/Dental Premiums Retirement Contributions Base Adjustments Internal Service Charges Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Fees and Other Revenues ProgRevenue Volume Inc/Dec Structural Balance Agenda Item: C-78-98-040-2-01 Agenda Item: $ $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount (127,268) (127,268) - $ 4,444,083 $ 4,444,083 -2.8% -2.8% Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov - $ 2,200,000 $ 1,200,000 1,000,000 2,200,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ (2,200,000) $ (1,200,000) (1,000,000) (2,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,000,000) $ - $ - $ 2,097,500 $ 2,097,500 2,097,500 - C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 Agenda Item: C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Other Non-Recurring Roof Tile Replacement & Suite Renovation Projects Non Recurring Fund Transfer E - $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov $ Agenda Item: $ 2,097,500 - FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ 126 2,097,500 $ 2,097,500 2,097,500 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 6,925,094 $ 6,925,094 $ (313,759) $ 179,241 (493,000) - $ - 179,241 179,241 (1,303,349) (1,128,255) (175,094) 6,611,335 $ -4.5% 5,800,986 -16.2% Adjustments: Base Adjustments Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service General Revenues Car Rental Surcharge Interest Revenue Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount $ Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,728,264 FY 2010 Revised Budget $ 3,000 $ 2,728,264 FY 2011 Budget Target $ 3,000 $ 2,728,264 $ - $ - $ - Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res General Revenues Interest Revenue Agenda Item: $ FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount (60,394) (60,394) (55,000) (55,000) $ 3,000 $ 2,612,870 0.0% -4.2% Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov - $ 2,200,000 $ 1,200,000 1,000,000 - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ (2,200,000) $ (1,200,000) (1,000,000) - $ - $ - $ 2,097,500 $ 2,097,500 - $ 2,097,500 $ - C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 Agenda Item: C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer E - $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov $ Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 127 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) Expenditures Revenue OPERATING FY 2010 Adopted Budget $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) FY 2010 Revised Budget $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) FY 2011 Budget Target $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ 374,153 $ 313,759 60,394 Adjustments: Base Adjustments Stad Net Op Transfer to/from Debt Service Stad Net Op Transfer to Long Term Res Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 374,153 313,759 60,394 $ (2,787,111) $ (2,787,111) -11.8% -11.8% Expenditures Revenue NON RECURRING NON PROJECT FY 2010 Adopted Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov $ (2,200,000) $ (1,200,000) (1,000,000) (2,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,000,000) $ (2,200,000) $ (2,200,000) $ 2,200,000 $ 1,200,000 1,000,000 2,200,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ (2,097,500) $ (2,097,500) (2,097,500) (2,097,500) $ (2,097,500) $ (2,097,500) C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 - Agenda Item: C-68-10-003-5-00 C-68-10-004-5-00 FY 2011 Budget Target Adjustments: Non Recurring Non Recurring Fund Transfer E - $ Agenda Item: FY 2010 Revised Budget Adjustments: Non Recurring Chase Field Roof Coating Proj Chase Field Party Suite Renov $ Agenda Item: FY 2011 Adopted Budget Percent Change from Target Amount 128 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt (2) Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2009 Year Ending June 30 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds $ Stadium District contractual obligations $ 4,428,888 Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities 52,735,000 $ 50,050,000 $ 2,428,888 0 0 57,163,888 $ 52,478,888 $ 47,230,000 $ 44,270,000 $ 41,165,000 0 0 0 978,394 10,864,916 10,465,338 55,134,916 $ 51,630,338 48,208,394 $ The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. 129 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2009 Year Ending June 30 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 – 19 Total $ $ Principal 3,260,000 3,390,000 3,570,000 3,760,000 3,960,000 23,225,000 41,165,000 $ $ Interest 2,159,094 2,028,694 1,850,719 1,663,294 1,461,194 3,875,913 13,038,908 Total Debt Service $ 5,419,094 5,418,694 5,420,719 5,423,294 5,421,194 27,100,913 $ 54,203,908 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING BY ISSUE As of June 30, 2009 Bond Issue Total Stadium District Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Amount $ 41,165,000 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Interest Principal $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 130 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation bond ratings of corporate/municipal Fitch Moody’s Standard Poor’s Premium quality AAA Aaa AAA High quality AA Aa AA Medium quality A A A Medium grade, lower quality BBB Baa BBB Predominantly speculative BB Ba BB Speculative, low grade B B B Poor to default CCC Caa CCC Highest speculation CC Ca CC Lowest quality, no interest C C C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DDD DD DD D D 131 & Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Fitch Stadium District Revenue Bonds Date Date Date Rating Rating Standard & Rating Assigned Moody's Assigned Poor's Assigned Aaa (1) AAA (1) (1) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating. Stadium District Loans Payable On January 23, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the renovation of suites at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $537,723 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over the next two years, ending December 2010. On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over nine years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2017. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2009 Year Ending June 30 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-19 2020-21 Total Principal $ 1,179,240 1,179,241 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 4,273,928 232,929 $ 10,465,338 132 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Improvement Districts Motion Pursuant to ARS §48-954, adopt the Fiscal Year 2011 Budgets for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2011 Budget Schedules entitled “Direct Assessment Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement Districts.” 133 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts 134 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Direct Assessment Special Districts ESTIMATED 2010-11 LESS 2010-11 DIST. 2009-10 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT NO. DISTRICT NAME LEVY PURPOSE BUDGET 2009-10 REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv Bond Interest $ 940 $ 940 $ 756 $ - $ 756 Bond redemption 2,410 2,410 2,216 2,216 $ 3,350 $ 3,350 $ 2,972 $ - $ 2,972 K-100 K-106 K-109 28548 28532 28795 28529 28793 28835 Marquerite Drive 7th Street North Improv. Plymouth Street 192nd Ave. Avenida del Sol Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 290 290 Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 2,015 2,336 4,351 Bond Interest $ Bond redemption $ 10,510 14,597 25,107 General General General General General General $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Subtotal $ 367 245 16,000 175,000 16,000 8,731 216,343 Total $ 249,441 135 290 290 2,015 2,336 4,351 10,510 14,597 25,107 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 367 245 16,000 175,000 16,000 8,731 216,343 $ 249,441 290 3,212 3,502 1,606 4,113 5,719 11,993 24,138 36,131 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,000 100,000 10,000 8,258 126,258 $ 174,582 - $ $ $ $ $ $ 290 3,212 3,502 1,606 4,113 5,719 11,993 24,138 36,131 $ $ - $ 8,000 100,000 10,000 8,258 126,258 $ - $ 174,582 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Tow ne Meadow s The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadow s 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadow s 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A 2009-10 BUDGET 3,059 3,307 9,869 1,214 24,572 10,854 895 21,154 2,788 4,907 6,506 6,178 243 1,103 4,273 5,908 2,427 10,844 3,928 4,486 8,040 4,022 4,930 728 705 8,721 1,881 12,774 955 6,052 955 8,887 7,245 11,479 15,575 1,627 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 3,362 3,668 10,183 1,244 25,254 11,185 936 23,241 2,879 5,040 6,725 6,978 249 1,133 4,394 6,091 2,488 11,137 4,041 5,045 8,236 4,132 5,062 747 717 8,744 2,025 13,116 979 6,645 979 8,974 7,364 11,232 16,123 1,611 136 TAX YEAR Estim ated Estim ated 2010 2010 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUE RATE 600 999,505 0.0600 3,000 1,211,390 0.2476 11,812 2,104,695 0.5612 1,520 300,380 0.5060 31,724 9,821,340 0.3230 13,538 2,554,260 0.5300 1,194 417,290 0.2861 29,594 2,683,730 1.1027 3,016 1,014,840 0.2972 5,627 1,161,953 0.4843 6,849 1,419,722 0.4824 7,947 2,282,590 0.3482 323 6,432,178 0.0050 1,261 659,220 0.1913 5,211 2,016,643 0.2584 7,530 2,137,935 0.3522 2,278 709,288 0.3212 10,658 2,792,551 0.3817 4,131 1,340,405 0.3082 5,968 1,075,870 0.5547 10,204 1,901,184 0.5367 3,712 698,340 0.5315 5,159 4,605,985 0.1120 797 1,082,705 0.0736 932 280,380 0.3324 8,898 4,352,319 0.2044 2,439 284,494 0.8573 13,931 6,996,639 0.1991 950 412,495 0.2303 7,666 2,935,080 0.2612 1,275 213,330 0.5977 9,116 3,565,333 0.2557 7,837 2,991,645 0.2620 11,186 4,269,115 0.2620 17,013 5,216,890 0.3261 1,515 1,430,305 0.1059 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 DESCRIPTION Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 2009-10 BUDGET 2,149 12,483 3,641 28,983 2,257 3,851 4,224 27,110 1,214 1,419 6,855 4,264 873,830 12,550 2,427 2,779 207 3,155 21,483 2,483 5,912 4,537 16,957 11,331 2,912 2,207 3,446 1,910 24,624 3,228 23,764 26,792 2,912 4,854 3,291 2,859 7,163 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 2,203 13,889 3,732 32,338 2,327 3,982 4,348 30,255 1,244 1,464 6,903 4,727 968,229 12,886 2,488 2,863 221 3,234 23,992 2,569 6,187 4,651 18,942 12,649 2,986 2,278 3,813 1,958 27,559 3,603 24,413 29,894 2,986 4,976 3,662 2,937 7,365 137 TAX YEAR Estim ated Estim ated 2010 2010 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUE RATE 2,393 380,925 0.6282 16,966 2,036,650 0.8330 3,522 1,047,128 0.3363 38,360 4,856,308 0.7899 2,435 695,745 0.3500 4,053 920,983 0.4401 4,988 942,805 0.5291 35,779 4,210,656 0.8497 1,554 315,900 0.4919 1,670 340,920 0.4899 7,093 3,235,815 0.2192 5,335 557,136 0.9576 1,067,919 254,434,790 0.4197 13,788 4,416,025 0.3122 2,947 430,685 0.6843 3,287 777,640 0.4227 120 401,480 0.0299 2,967 1,221,527 0.2429 28,967 3,125,680 0.9267 2,996 328,285 0.9126 7,423 1,094,305 0.6783 5,637 680,845 0.8279 23,025 2,818,870 0.8168 14,738 2,479,896 0.5943 3,618 631,170 0.5732 2,617 276,860 0.9452 4,592 1,134,503 0.4048 2,518 550,580 0.4573 33,598 3,744,608 0.8972 4,421 353,775 1.2497 24,364 5,445,053 0.4475 35,925 4,408,580 0.8149 3,212 891,639 0.3602 5,254 1,084,386 0.4845 4,096 353,300 1.1594 2,977 662,260 0.4495 7,600 3,265,013 0.2328 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 2009-10 BUDGET 14,088 11,492 19,826 8,017 5,442 16,824 15,707 10,567 151,462 5,313 12,898 37,483 23,032 23,293 2,411 5,356 27,270 3,104 11,109 3,578 3,582 33,328 4,537 3,016 1,194 1,671 4,362 4,404 7,163 7,402 1,012 4,614 22,895 21,538 7,012 1,910 16,863 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 14,442 11,753 22,071 8,269 6,024 18,766 17,525 11,781 167,825 5,998 14,262 41,818 25,644 25,967 2,487 5,974 30,449 3,182 12,360 3,671 3,672 37,261 4,651 3,361 1,224 1,713 4,478 4,859 7,344 7,778 1,042 5,163 25,513 24,069 7,808 1,958 17,442 138 TAX YEAR Estim ated Estim ated 2010 2010 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUE RATE 14,790 4,018,285 0.3681 12,459 3,821,185 0.3261 27,214 4,748,459 0.5731 10,339 1,362,055 0.7591 6,392 518,194 1.2335 22,657 2,760,020 0.8209 20,910 2,985,581 0.7004 13,994 2,388,885 0.5858 186,270 38,778,329 0.4803 6,979 1,470,320 0.4747 16,127 2,442,020 0.6604 46,961 8,426,900 0.5573 29,231 4,709,356 0.6207 30,677 4,059,425 0.7557 3,159 571,890 0.5524 6,539 1,329,588 0.4918 35,446 4,495,204 0.7885 3,581 2,044,549 0.1751 14,828 3,047,182 0.4866 4,396 1,012,754 0.4341 3,772 431,348 0.8745 44,668 5,463,388 0.8176 4,620 822,213 0.5619 4,016 958,365 0.4190 1,376 343,910 0.4001 1,893 254,660 0.7433 5,208 824,652 0.6315 6,527 1,038,755 0.6283 7,355 2,040,488 0.3605 8,400 1,908,417 0.4402 1,278 248,940 0.5134 5,736 958,355 0.5985 29,314 4,754,276 0.6166 27,330 3,828,754 0.7138 9,889 5,112,986 0.1934 1,978 445,235 0.4443 16,051 5,333,464 0.3009 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 DESCRIPTION Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentw ood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa 2009-10 BUDGET 4,854 1,214 7,313 1,941 12,407 3,783 3,691 3,258 10,618 1,948 8,130 11,569 3,582 22,748 30,869 12,285 7,210 1,910 5,097 19,382 10,509 23,772 3,509 4,144 5,577 2,182 6,939 15,861 2,425 6,305 7,310 1,940 8,484 3,398 12,905 1,940 2,140 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 4,976 1,244 7,531 1,990 12,483 3,888 3,821 3,356 11,211 2,034 8,368 11,873 3,672 25,454 34,557 13,647 8,010 1,958 5,225 21,650 11,649 26,540 3,917 4,251 5,220 2,237 7,116 15,272 2,486 6,463 7,500 1,989 8,203 3,483 13,239 1,989 2,224 139 Estim ated TAX LEVY 5,449 1,159 8,934 2,246 12,897 4,221 4,413 3,739 12,201 2,016 10,021 12,246 4,485 31,380 41,686 17,111 9,192 2,120 6,319 26,037 13,182 31,649 4,690 4,857 5,881 2,620 8,453 17,201 2,963 7,633 8,561 2,251 9,306 3,391 15,618 2,411 2,335 TAX YEAR Estim ated 2010 2010 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 2,066,130 0.2637 284,595 0.4072 1,031,830 0.8658 366,020 0.6136 2,682,641 0.4808 848,680 0.4974 827,310 0.5334 1,029,715 0.3631 1,196,586 1.0197 587,511 0.3431 2,324,940 0.4310 2,810,280 0.4358 997,200 0.4498 4,887,575 0.6420 4,960,109 0.8404 4,451,940 0.3843 2,638,475 0.3484 428,020 0.4953 1,554,842 0.4064 2,744,622 0.9487 1,735,102 0.7597 3,494,645 0.9056 535,040 0.8766 1,630,392 0.2979 2,358,698 0.2493 1,137,430 0.2303 2,563,912 0.3297 6,085,788 0.2826 1,040,110 0.2849 2,759,190 0.2766 3,105,517 0.2757 2,357,220 0.0955 4,372,905 0.2128 864,965 0.3920 6,367,612 0.2453 953,620 0.2528 407,965 0.5724 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 DESCRIPTION Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Tow n & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Merew ay Manor Cox Heights 7 Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 2009-10 BUDGET 4,607 4,361 12,156 3,121 6,304 13,336 13,443 8,729 5,577 11,154 2,382 6,108 2,575 7,704 1,510 2,425 7,517 3,060 1,849 2,683 32,250 19,205 13,579 8,967 7,553 6,304 2,182 1,455 5,334 6,900 1,940 1,433 13,554 4,886 2,149 2,385 38,686 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 4,723 4,474 12,472 3,182 6,469 13,672 13,813 8,949 5,717 11,435 2,447 6,004 2,642 8,097 1,555 2,486 7,706 3,139 1,898 2,266 33,061 19,726 13,921 9,204 7,749 6,463 2,237 1,492 5,469 7,496 1,989 1,469 13,929 5,070 2,203 2,497 43,135 140 Estim ated TAX LEVY 5,623 5,231 14,521 3,279 7,764 16,164 15,703 10,544 6,614 13,336 2,806 6,107 3,203 10,158 1,804 3,111 9,044 3,453 2,291 2,045 38,635 23,318 16,320 10,643 9,084 7,198 2,563 1,797 6,079 7,755 2,449 1,493 15,877 5,298 2,136 2,577 49,896 TAX YEAR Estim ated 2010 2010 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 2,402,603 0.2340 2,028,191 0.2579 4,366,385 0.3326 1,709,994 0.1918 1,294,850 0.5996 5,416,453 0.2984 6,058,726 0.2592 4,207,357 0.2506 2,192,535 0.3017 5,478,915 0.2434 548,950 0.5112 1,114,080 0.5482 1,147,730 0.2791 2,622,385 0.3874 740,590 0.2436 1,236,640 0.2516 2,607,730 0.3468 1,516,299 0.2277 352,017 0.6508 580,679 0.3522 13,686,930 0.2823 8,212,816 0.2839 11,750,320 0.1389 2,832,357 0.3758 3,620,500 0.2509 1,794,336 0.4012 817,350 0.3136 618,660 0.2905 2,487,860 0.2443 1,332,995 0.5818 672,190 0.3643 272,546 0.5478 4,415,150 0.3596 1,228,386 0.4313 345,020 0.6191 679,905 0.3790 6,170,170 0.8087 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 DESCRIPTION Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A 2009-10 BUDGET 17,131 7,641 5,269 3,067 31,621 27,611 13,610 12,336 15,055 12,094 2,388 7,393 49,203 37,612 4,402 4,806 339,183 4,586 6,881 6,081 37,811 2,645 9,520 42,678 10,001 24,121 38,412 8,311 13,041 13,924 34,065 3,172 4,289 6,482 10,571 44,727 24,000 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 19,097 7,833 5,519 3,153 35,373 30,768 15,178 13,776 16,805 13,511 2,448 7,737 54,747 41,824 4,894 5,323 378,646 4,749 7,794 6,738 42,214 2,948 10,590 47,590 10,278 26,893 42,905 8,562 14,559 15,493 38,038 3,268 4,406 7,215 11,792 49,891 26,788 141 TAX YEAR Estim ated Estim ated 2010 2010 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUE RATE 22,842 3,822,361 0.5976 8,301 1,648,441 0.5036 5,853 1,299,030 0.4506 3,623 380,480 0.9522 41,098 6,173,412 0.6657 36,813 4,386,175 0.8393 17,043 2,780,264 0.6130 17,154 2,216,185 0.7740 19,821 2,933,390 0.6757 16,329 2,009,156 0.8127 2,414 608,830 0.3965 7,845 1,574,855 0.4981 64,227 7,863,524 0.8168 51,472 5,979,691 0.8608 5,686 2,097,114 0.2711 6,763 723,013 0.9354 471,796 39,878,894 1.1831 4,651 779,573 0.5966 8,126 1,481,162 0.5486 8,011 1,431,300 0.5597 51,218 6,171,595 0.8299 3,775 478,655 0.7887 12,998 1,941,385 0.6695 53,811 7,170,473 0.7505 10,672 2,099,845 0.5082 32,824 3,075,190 1.0674 50,617 5,821,227 0.8695 8,998 1,670,530 0.5386 17,947 1,501,170 1.1955 20,383 4,549,798 0.4480 43,313 4,397,806 0.9849 2,842 738,822 0.3847 4,521 743,665 0.6079 8,620 724,261 1.1902 14,778 3,750,788 0.3940 56,897 7,872,558 0.7227 31,950 4,135,505 0.7726 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23574 DESCRIPTION Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadow s 10 Litchfield Vista View s II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigw am Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 RUSSELL RANCH PH 1 Wigw am Creek South Litchfield Vista View s IIIA& Dos Rios Units 1&2 White Tank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigw am Creek N 2&2b Coldw ater Ranch 2009-10 BUDGET 12,169 44,917 22,098 9,948 15,979 7,278 3,155 9,381 21,999 18,836 17,357 3,820 8,979 3,975 17,888 10,500 6,087 3,164 15,247 2,301 8,656 721,383 1,278 6,769 88,866 46,383 1,671 14,112 21,503 3,975 49,221 1,217 4,306 27,151 5,328 30,193 16,269 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 13,610 50,150 24,453 9,952 16,671 7,464 3,234 10,463 24,626 21,038 19,429 3,916 9,971 4,426 20,034 10,770 6,816 3,515 16,887 2,556 8,935 777,934 1,365 7,254 98,404 50,046 1,713 15,192 23,239 4,328 53,008 1,310 4,645 29,171 5,716 32,557 9,521 142 Estim ated TAX LEVY 16,093 58,766 32,267 9,192 18,213 7,159 3,062 12,246 28,276 25,085 22,909 4,448 12,505 5,412 23,877 11,373 8,289 4,350 22,135 3,172 9,359 782,693 1,538 9,393 116,217 65,071 1,790 19,062 29,482 5,134 67,945 1,570 5,284 39,233 6,130 36,625 9,560 TAX YEAR Estim ated 2010 2010 NET ASSESSED TAX VALUE RATE 2,204,065 0.7302 6,968,175 0.8433 12,152,197 0.2655 3,678,166 0.2499 4,107,031 0.4435 3,170,728 0.2258 1,220,190 0.2509 2,765,295 0.4428 4,967,163 0.5693 2,599,660 0.9649 2,851,705 0.8033 1,786,880 0.2489 3,834,754 0.3261 996,735 0.5430 2,782,310 0.8582 2,460,615 0.4622 2,200,755 0.3766 1,453,700 0.2992 3,151,320 0.7024 1,461,520 0.2170 1,240,982 0.7542 135,711,183 0.5767 662,160 0.2323 3,635,138 0.2584 22,454,030 0.5176 16,107,275 0.4040 872,133 0.2052 4,935,396 0.3862 9,152,717 0.3221 4,190,080 0.1225 21,661,875 0.3137 2,262,860 0.0694 2,359,467 0.2239 8,949,323 0.4384 2,532,180 0.2421 8,923,795 0.4104 2,015,364 0.4744 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts Street Lighting Improvement Districts (continued) DIST # 23578 23579 23580 23594 23595 23596 DESCRIPTION Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanTan Vista Unit III Rancho Cabrillo Jackrabbit Estates Sundero 13435 Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 23104 Litchfield Vista View s 2009-10 BUDGET 71,194 15,057 3,648 54,356 3,857 616 Estim ated 2010-11 BUDGET 76,292 16,227 3,784 49,773 4,163 667 4,914,274 5,331,866 2,388 2,052 2,448 2,280 143 TAX YEAR Estim ated Estim ated 2010 2010 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUE RATE 83,101 24,275,212 0.3423 18,769 17,229,838 0.1089 4,046 5,761,590 0.0702 49,729 4,947,811 1.0051 4,919 3,593,241 0.1369 766 964,114 0.0795 6,030,595 2,490 2,746 2010 SQUARE FOOTAGE 314,226 1,351,641 0.7924 0.2032 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget Improvement Districts 144