FY 2009-10 Annual Business Strategies Flood Control, Library, Stadium and Other Special Districts Adopted Budget Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Maricopa County Districts Flood Control District Flood Control District Motions Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Capital Improvement Program 1 3 5 9 14 16 18 Library District Library District Motions Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Capital Improvement Program 95 97 99 106 111 113 116 Stadium District Stadium District Motions Transmittal Letter Budget Summary Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Debt Service 119 121 124 133 135 137 140 Improvement District Special Districts Motions Direct Assessment Special Districts Street Lighting Improvement District Levies 145 147 148 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Table of Contents Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Motion Final Budget Adoption (Approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 22, 2009) Convene a public hearing, pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-17104 and 42-17105, to consider and adopt the following: The Fiscal Year 2009-10 Flood Control Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for the Flood Control District in the amount of $96,730,311. 1 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 2 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Adopted Fiscal Year 2009-10 expenditure budget for the Flood Control District is $96,730,311. Budgeted capital project expenditures have remained at $60,000,000 in Fiscal Year 2009-10. The budget continues to provide for a focused effort in conducting floodplain delineations so properties are designated as being located in or out of floodplains and floodways before building on the land is started. Flood Control District Capital Project Expenditures In Fiscal Year 2009-10 the Flood Control FY 2004 Through FY 2010 $70,000,000 District tax rate will remain steady at $60,718,007 $60,000,000 $58,006,298 $55,128,752 $0.1367. The District was directed by the $60,000,000 Board of Directors to implement a cap of $43,507,113 $50,000,000 $47,741,781 $42,692,818 2% on its tax levy growth, excluding new $40,000,000 construction, in order to protect taxpayers $30,000,000 from tax increases due to increases in assessed property values. The maintained $20,000,000 rate results in a property tax revenue $10,000,000 budget of $74,246,836 which is an $increase of $150,310 from FY 2008-09. FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Forecast Adopted revenue totals to $13,591,000 for costsharing with cities and towns on capital projects. In Fiscal Year 2009-10, the Flood Control District has budgeted operating revenue of $77.5 million, which is $567,696 (.74%) more than in Fiscal Year 200809. The Adopted Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program budget reflects strong activity in the construction phase of major infrastructure projects, which are geographically distributed to benefit all five County Supervisory Districts. Additionally, the budget provides for continued funding of $1.5 million for the Flood Prone Properties Acquisition program. In all, the Flood Control District has 31 scheduled projects totaling $300 million in their five-year Capital Improvement Program. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 3 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 4 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Flood Control District Analysis by Mary Driessen, Management & Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is to provide flood hazard identification, regulation, remediation, and education to the people in Maricopa County so that they can reduce their risks of injury, death, and property damage due to flooding while enjoying the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Vision The vision of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County is that the people of Maricopa County and future generations will have the maximum amount of protection from the effects of flooding through fiscally responsible flood control actions and multiple-use facilities that complement or enhance the beauty of our desert environment. 5 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Budget Summary Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2007-08 ACTUAL SOURCES 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST $ 134,697 $ 133,884 813 4,000 $ 4,000 4,000 4,000 $ 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE $ - $ - 6,000 $ 6,000 6,000 6,000 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW FCMP - FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE $ 269,265 $ 269,265 - 145,000 $ 140,000 5,000 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT DAMS - DAM SAFETY $ 78,799,106 $ 74,208,526 4,590,580 - 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES $ 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP 53,313 51,759 1,554 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ - $ (4,000) -100.0% (4,000) -100.0% $ 2,000 $ 2,000 42,100 42,100 $ 36,100 36,100 601.7% 601.7% 145,000 140,000 5,000 $ 320,938 $ 318,938 2,000 186,000 174,000 12,000 $ 41,000 34,000 7,000 28.3% 24.3% 140.0% 15,509,000 $ 13,550,000 599,000 1,360,000 15,509,000 13,550,000 599,000 1,360,000 $ 62,587,257 $ 58,206,073 4,363,196 17,988 13,591,000 10,319,000 3,272,000 $ (1,918,000) -12.4% (3,231,000) -23.8% (599,000) -100.0% 1,912,000 140.6% 2,852,601 $ 2,852,601 - 6,873,683 $ 38,000 6,835,683 6,873,683 38,000 6,835,683 $ 6,771,671 $ 30,574 6,741,097 5,694,735 5,694,735 $ (1,178,948) -17.2% (38,000) -100.0% (1,140,948) -16.7% $ 13,046,442 $ 13,046,442 75,129,910 $ 75,129,910 75,129,910 75,129,910 $ 24,820,028 $ 24,820,028 75,341,085 75,341,085 $ 211,175 211,175 0.0% 0.0% $ 664,520 $ 664,520 728,185 $ 728,185 728,185 728,185 $ 389,106 $ 389,106 689,554 689,554 $ (38,631) (38,631) -5.3% -5.3% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ USES 69HI - FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION $ PLNG - FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLDP - FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION 95,766,631 $ 98,395,778 $ 98,395,778 $ 94,944,313 $ 95,544,474 $ (2,851,304) -2.9% 10,526,326 $ 7,277,052 3,249,274 7,768,668 $ 4,941,286 2,827,382 7,768,668 4,941,286 2,827,382 $ 6,629,398 $ 4,208,189 2,421,209 9,902,282 7,036,932 2,865,350 $ (2,133,614) (2,095,646) (37,968) -27.5% -42.4% -1.3% 69HE - FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH MASM - FLOOD SAFETY EDUCATION EDAY - FLOOD CNTRL PUBLIC INFORMATION FCSR - FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE FWRN - FLOOD WARNING $ 836,882 $ 571,609 213,073 52,200 - 2,487,473 $ 606,671 701,476 411,367 767,959 2,487,473 606,671 701,476 411,367 767,959 $ 2,078,131 $ 514,205 459,654 352,295 751,977 2,512,432 729,688 220,263 382,109 1,180,372 $ (24,959) (123,017) 481,213 29,258 (412,413) -1.0% -20.3% 68.6% 7.1% -53.7% 69FH - FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FREV - FLOODPLAIN REVIEW FCMP - FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE $ 2,430,527 $ 1,454,609 975,918 2,309,086 $ 1,414,157 894,929 2,309,086 1,414,157 894,929 $ 1,865,145 $ 1,193,679 671,466 2,319,360 1,539,268 780,092 $ (10,274) (125,111) 114,837 -0.4% -8.8% 12.8% 69HR - FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION HAZD - FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS MAIN - FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT DAMS - DAM SAFETY FMLT - FLOOD MULTI PURP ENHANCEMENTS $ 125,353,215 $ 114,972,252 7,758,336 2,622,627 - 73,667,893 $ 55,414,706 6,481,664 8,862,294 2,909,229 73,667,893 57,253,706 6,481,664 8,023,294 1,909,229 $ 113,088,935 $ 96,401,241 7,485,456 6,873,501 2,328,737 72,398,743 48,878,399 6,462,379 17,057,965 - $ 1,269,150 1.7% 8,375,307 14.6% 19,285 0.3% (9,034,671) -112.6% 1,909,229 100.0% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES PROC - PROCUREMENT RWAY - REAL ESTATE SERVICES FACI - FACILITIES MGMT PROF SUPP SVCS RECO - RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ 2,467,530 $ 63,399 1,501,303 349,226 176,042 377,560 - 3,653,032 $ 109,111 1,301,249 281,321 198,956 364,208 753,956 628,611 15,620 3,653,032 109,111 1,301,249 281,321 198,956 364,208 753,956 628,611 15,620 $ 8,414,309 $ 115,843 6,220,852 284,263 175,464 323,358 740,287 541,210 13,032 3,647,894 112,925 1,296,966 302,804 189,054 322,248 801,494 572,655 49,748 $ 5,138 0.1% (3,814) -3.5% 4,283 0.3% (21,483) -7.6% 9,902 5.0% 41,960 11.5% (47,538) -6.3% 55,956 8.9% (34,128) -218.5% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES $ (56,186,608) $ 1,215,272 (58,357,554) 955,674 3,094,639 $ 1,232,332 1,862,307 3,094,639 1,232,332 1,862,307 $ (46,550,069) $ 1,232,332 (49,709,458) 1,927,057 3,105,812 1,306,869 1,798,943 $ (11,173) (74,537) 63,364 -0.4% -6.0% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT GISA - GIS APPLICATION DEV AND SUPP HDSP - HELP DESK SUPPORT $ 2,749,362 $ 391,199 721,171 1,636,992 - 2,981,497 $ 508,418 200,904 584,801 1,655,416 31,958 2,981,497 508,418 200,904 584,801 1,655,416 31,958 $ 2,266,142 $ 423,680 123,900 490,212 1,201,718 26,632 2,843,788 483,486 310,801 369,504 1,645,684 34,313 $ 137,709 24,932 (109,897) 215,297 9,732 (2,355) 4.6% 4.9% -54.7% 36.8% 0.6% -7.4% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 88,177,234 $ 95,962,288 $ 95,962,288 $ 87,791,991 $ 96,730,311 $ (768,023) -0.8% 6 3.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2007-08 ACTUAL TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ SUBTOTAL $ 68,973,118 68,973,118 $ $ 74,096,526 74,096,526 $ $ 74,096,526 74,096,526 $ $ 73,259,777 73,259,777 $ $ 74,246,836 74,246,836 $ $ 150,310 150,310 0.2% 0.2% $ SUBTOTAL $ 2,759,309 2,759,309 $ $ 746,000 746,000 $ $ 746,000 746,000 $ $ 4,242,162 4,242,162 $ $ 1,133,600 1,133,600 $ $ 387,600 387,600 52.0% 52.0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0620 - OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 15,984,724 82,552 16,067,276 $ $ $ 13,591,000 144,249 13,735,249 $ $ 8,548,368 132,050 8,680,418 $ $ 14,910,000 133,384 15,043,384 $ $ 14,910,000 133,384 15,043,384 $ CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ 12,000 12,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ 2,348,767 5,606,161 7,954,928 $ $ $ 950,000 5,478,789 6,428,789 $ $ 1,137,665 7,624,291 8,761,956 $ $ 900,000 7,609,868 8,509,868 $ $ 900,000 7,609,868 8,509,868 ALL REVENUES $ 95,766,631 $ 98,395,778 $ 98,395,778 $ 94,944,313 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 95,766,631 $ 98,395,778 $ 98,395,778 $ 94,944,313 $ LICENSES AND PERMITS 0610 - LICENSES AND PERMITS FY 2007-08 ACTUAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 10,054,692 $ 66,200 90,715 3,159,691 207,225 (19,636) 3,030,143 16,589,030 $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 0803 - FUEL 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0806 - SUPPLIES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 1,480,374 340,992 53,743 127,453 2,002,562 SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING 0850 - UTILITIES 0872 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION OUT 0873 - SERVICES-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ 442,878 10,747,430 566,654 242,238 2,765,278 1 62,653 64,407 10,651 289,833 442 197,042 15,389,507 $ $ $ FY 2008-09 REVISED 17,256,170 17,256,170 2,228,541 2,228,541 $ $ $ $ $ $ 17,437,329 17,437,329 8,672,832 $ 256,648 63,984 403,913 44,586,294 212,465 (1) 54,196,135 $ 7,251,000 50,230,031 1,559,217 59,040,248 $ 88,177,234 95,962,288 $ 17,223,170 17,223,170 2,228,541 2,228,541 17,437,329 17,437,329 FY 2008-09 FORECAST $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,531,545 777 454,929 165 16,300,146 18,287,562 $ 95,544,474 $ (2,851,304) -2.9% 95,544,474 $ (2,851,304) -2.9% $ (1) $ 4,135,712 4,135,711 $ 2,193,972 2,193,972 $ 194,449 17,609,415 17,803,864 $ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 653,161 163,851 16,739,517 17,556,529 162,926 14,828,451 14,991,377 - -8.8% 8.1% -8.7% 50,000 (2,131,079) (2,081,079) FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ (1,319,000) 10,865 (1,308,135) ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ $ $ $ $ $ (653,161) (163,851) 483,653 (333,359) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% -1.9% 34,569 34,569 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 1.6% (194,449) (172,086) (366,535) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.0% -2.1% -44.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% -0.8% OTHER FINANCING USES CAPITAL 0910 - LAND $ 0915 - BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0940 - INFRASTRUCTURE 0950 - DEBT SERVICE 0956 - CAPITAL-ALLOCATION IN SUBTOTAL $ TOTAL USES $ $ 7 $ $ 9,444,000 48,070,031 1,559,217 59,073,248 $ $ 5,505,510 38,737 189,629 223,464 43,507,113 912,888 50,377,341 $ 95,962,288 $ $ 13,624,000 44,176,000 1,375,946 59,175,946 $ (4,180,000) 3,894,031 183,271 (102,698) $ 87,791,991 $ 96,730,311 $ (768,023) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2007-08 ACTUAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 58,357,554 58,357,554 $ 95,766,631 95,766,631 $ $ $ ( 58,357,554) $ ( 58,357,554) $ FY 2008-09 REVISED 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ 76,885,778 6,600,000 83,485,778 $ $ $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ FY 2008-09 FORECAST 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ 76,885,778 6,600,000 83,485,778 $ $ $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 58,206,067 58,206,067 $ 79,847,704 6,600,000 86,447,704 $ $ $ - $ (49,709,458) (49,709,458) $ 54,218,383 54,218,383 $ 77,453,474 4,500,000 81,953,474 $ $ $ - $ (40,627,383) (40,627,383) $ (5,401,075) (5,401,075) 0.0% -9.1% -9.1% 567,696 (2,100,000) (1,532,304) 0.7% -31.8% -1.8% 4,082,075 4,082,075 0.0% -9.1% -9.1% DEPARTMENT O PERATING TOTAL $ 95,766,631 $ 76,885,778 $ 76,885,778 $ 79,847,704 $ 77,453,474 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL $ - $ 21,510,000 $ 21,510,000 $ 15,096,609 $ 18,091,000 $ (3,419,000) -15.9% DEPARTMENT TOTAL $ 95,766,631 $ 98,395,778 $ 98,395,778 $ 94,944,313 $ 95,544,474 $ (2,851,304) -2.9% FY 2007-08 ACTUAL 990 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 991 FLOOD CONTROL OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST 55,181,600 55,181,600 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ 51,209,749 51,209,749 $ $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ $ $ 91,353,188 91,353,188 $ 35,962,288 44,709,458 80,671,746 $ 35,962,288 44,709,458 80,671,746 $ 36,582,242 49,709,458 86,291,700 $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 77,357,694 $ $ $ $ ( 58,357,554) $ ( 58,357,554) $ $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ $ - $ (44,709,458) (44,709,458) $ $ - $ (49,709,458) (49,709,458) $ 0.7% ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ $ $ 567,696 - 0.0% 0.0% $ (768,023) 4,082,075 3,314,052 -2.1% 9.1% 4.1% - $ (40,627,383) (40,627,383) $ (4,082,075) (4,082,075) 9.1% 9.1% (768,023) -2.1% DEPARTMENT O PERATING TOTAL $ 32,995,634 $ 35,962,288 $ 35,962,288 $ 36,582,242 $ 36,730,311 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL $ 55,181,600 $ 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 51,209,749 $ 60,000,000 $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL $ 88,177,234 $ 95,962,288 $ 95,962,288 $ 87,791,991 $ 96,730,311 $ (768,023) 0.0% -0.8% Staffing by Program and Activity FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 690 - FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FLOOD HAZARD PLANNING FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD OUTREACH FLOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REGULATION FLOODPLAIN COMPLIANCE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW PROGRAM TOTAL FLOOD HAZARD REMEDIATION DAM SAFETY FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL PROJECTS FLOOD CTRL STRUCTURE MAINT PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 0.40 2.00 0.60 3.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.65 0.05 0.70 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 0.40 0.75 1.15 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 2.00 7.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Staffing by Market Range Title FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 690 - FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Administrator Attorney - Senior Counsel Director - Flood Control Dist Engineering Manager Financial Supervisor - Dept Operations Manager Operations/Program Manager Department Total FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 FY 2008-09 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Staffing by Fund FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 690 - FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 690 - FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 991 - FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED 7.00 7.00 FY 2008-09 FORECAST 7.00 7.00 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 7.00 7.00 0.00% 0.00% FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % - 0.00% 0.00% Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Flood Control District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real property. Unlike the County primary property tax levy, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in District secondary property taxes. However, the Flood Control District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the County primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Flood Control District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rates. Flood Control District Preliminary Tax Levy Fiscal Year 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Net Assessed Value (Thousands) 12,361,851 13,660,618 15,504,112 17,485,890 19,544,069 21,174,169 24,140,629 26,585,248 29,605,196 32,778,027 45,937,945 54,751,263 54,862,329 Tax Rate (per $100 N.A.V.) 0.3425 0.3270 0.2858 0.2534 0.2319 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2119 0.2047 0.1533 0.1367 0.1367 Tax Levy 38,118,477 42,339,342 44,670,223 44,310,754 45,042,553 45,322,696 44,165,629 50,550,367 62,733,411 67,096,622 70,422,870 74,674,333 74,996,804 9 The Board of Supervisors must adopt the Flood Control District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. The schedule to the left lists the District secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last twelve fiscal years, plus the assessed value and the tax rate for FY 2009-10. The Flood Control District’s property tax rate remains flat at $0.1367 per $100 net assessed value. Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District NAV (Millions) Net Assessed Value vs. Tax Rate 0.4000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 0.3000 0.2000 0.1000 0.0000 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Fiscal Year As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2009-10 ADOPTED PROPERTY TAX LEVY Flood Control District Levy Description Salt River Proj. Net Effective Net Assessed Value Assessed Value FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: FY 2009-10 Adopted $ 54,862,329,172 FY 2008-09 Adopted $ 54,626,432,391 FY 2007-08 Adopted $ 45,937,944,910 $ $ $ 105,522,275 99,338,740 97,574,499 Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP $ $ $ Revenue from 1-cent Levy 54,967,851,447 54,725,771,131 46,035,519,409 $ $ $ 10 5,496,785 5,472,577 4,603,552 Tax Rates $ 0.1367 $ 0.1367 $ 0.1533 Property Tax Levy $ $ $ 74,996,804 74,674,333 70,422,870 SRP Payments in Lieu of Taxes(PILT) $ $ $ 144,249 135,796 149,582 Total Tax Levy & PILT $ $ $ 75,141,053 74,810,129 70,572,452 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Levy Limit FY 2009-10 Flood Control District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 74,674,333 76,167,820 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 54,626,432,391 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value 54,862,329,172 D. Recommended Calculation D3. Recommended Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Divided by 100) D5. Recommended Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.1367 74,996,804 322,471 0.4% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 54,135,162,156 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 491,270,235 $ 54,626,432,391 11 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The FY 2009-10 budgeted property tax revenue of $74,246,836 is based on an historical collection rate of 99.0%. The table below reflects the estimated revenue collection for FY 2009-10. Property Tax Collection Analysis Flood Control District FY 2009-10 $ Levy Amount 74,996,884 Estimated Collections $ 74,246,836 Collection Rate 99% Licenses and Permit Revenue Licenses and Permits $ (Millions) The Flood Control District collects revenue from 6.0 customers for drainage plans, plan site reviews, 5.0 and licenses. Rates for 4.0 licenses and permits are approved by the Board of 3.0 Directors, unless 2.0 otherwise set forth in 1.0 statute. The revenue generated from licenses 0.0 and permits is used to 2008 2009* 2010** offset the cost of issuing * Projected Actual ** Budget the permits. The chart above shows FY 2007-08 actual and FY 2008-09 forecast revenue for this category. In FY 2008-09, there is a one-time unanticipated revenue for the Trans Western Pipeline to go over the McMicken Dam ($3.25M). FY 2009-10, the District is projecting steady requests for licenses and permits. Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental revenues are amounts received by the Flood Control District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Payments in Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. The table to the right reflects historical payments and the projected FY 2009-10 payments in lieu of taxes. The increase in revenue is reflective of FY 2009-10 increase in the District’s secondary property tax rate. 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09* 2009-10** $ * Projected Actual ** Budget 12 136,905 152,557 196,239 191,727 199,736 149,582 133,384 144,249 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Other Intergovernmental Revenue Other Intergovernmental Revenue includes a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The District FY 2009-10 budget is reflective of receiving $13,591,000 for cost sharing of capital projects. Miscellaneous Revenue Micellaneous Revenue 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 F iscal Y ear 2008 * Projected 2009* 2010** **Budgeted The Flood Control District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include sale of copies, interest earnings, building rental, insurance recoveries, land sales, map sales, and equipment rental as well as sales of fixed assets, and bond proceeds. Other Financing Sources In the Flood Control District, Other Financing Sources are comprised solely of Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers In The Flood Control District transfers fund balances from the operating to the capital fund throughout the year in order to support the District’s capital improvement program. Flood Control District Fund Transfers $70 (millions) $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009* 2010** * Projected **Budgeted 13 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Fund Balance Summary Operating Fund (991) FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 11,207,341 $ 9,685,968 $ 9,685,968 $ 15,620,793 $ 15,776,797 Designations: Budget Stabilization: Cash Flow / Property Tax Total Budget Stabilization Total Designations $ $ $ 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 $ $ $ 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 $ $ $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 $ $ $ 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 8,007,341 $ (2,814,032) $ (2,814,032) $ 3,120,793 $ 3,276,797 $ 95,766,631 95,766,631 $ 76,885,778 6,600,000 83,485,778 76,885,778 $ 6,600,000 83,485,778 $ 79,847,704 6,600,000 86,447,704 $ 77,453,474 4,500,000 81,953,474 36,582,242 49,709,458 86,291,700 $ 36,730,311 40,627,383 77,357,694 Sources: Operating Non Recurring Non Project Total Sources: Uses: Operating Non Recurring Non Project Total Uses: $ $ $ 91,353,188 91,353,188 Operating Balance $ Accounting Adjustments $ $ $ $ $ 35,962,288 44,709,458 80,671,746 $ 35,962,288 $ 44,709,458 80,671,746 $ 4,413,443 $ 40,923,490 $ 40,923,490 $ 43,265,462 $ 40,723,163 $ 9 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 12,420,793 $ - $ - $ 3,276,797 $ 7,872,577 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 15,620,793 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 15,776,797 $ 20,372,577 14 $ $ $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Project Fund (990) FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 20,774,706 $ 18,339,252 $ 18,339,252 $ 23,950,674 $ 30,946,992 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 20,774,706 $ 18,339,252 $ 18,339,252 $ 23,950,674 $ 30,946,992 $ $ - $ 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ 58,206,067 58,206,067 $ $ - $ 59,619,458 59,619,458 $ $ 54,218,383 54,218,383 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 $ 51,209,749 51,209,749 $ 60,000,000 60,000,000 Sources: Operating Non Recurring Non Project Total Sources: $ 58,357,554 58,357,554 Uses: Non Recurring Non Project Total Uses: $ 55,181,600 55,181,600 $ Operating Balance $ 58,357,554 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 14 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 23,950,674 $ 17,958,710 $ 17,958,710 $ 30,946,992 $ 25,165,375 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 23,950,674 $ 17,958,710 $ 17,958,710 $ 30,946,992 $ 25,165,375 15 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Budget Adjustments and Reconciliation Flood Control Operating (991) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 35,962,288 $ 76,885,778 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 35,962,288 $ 76,885,778 FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 35,962,288 $ 76,885,778 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: PERSONNEL SAVINGS ADJUSTMENT $ 768,022 $ - $ Subtotal $ 1 $ 1 $ $ 36,730,311 $ $ Subtotal $ - $ - $ $ 36,730,311 $ 77,453,474 $ Subtotal $ - $ 36,321,422 4,305,961 40,627,383 $ 4,000,000 500,000 4,500,000 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED NON-RECURRING BUDGET $ 40,627,383 $ 4,500,000 FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS Miscellaneous Adjustment FY 2009-10 Forecast Revenue Adjustment FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Increase in Property Taxes Increase in Licenses and Permits Increase in Payment in Lieu of Taxes Increase in Interest Earnings Decrease in Miscellaneous Revenue (Data Sales) FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET (3,834,045) (3,834,045) 73,051,733 3,984,355 387,600 10,865 50,000 (31,079) 4,401,741 NON-RECURRING NON-OPERATING 0001 Spook Hill Condemnation Sale of Excess Land Fund Transfer to Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) Increase in Fund Transfer to Flood Control Capital Projects Fund (990) 16 77,357,694 $ 81,953,474 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Projects Fund (990) EXPENDITURES REVENUE NON-RECURRING NON-OPERATING 0001 Transfer in From Flood Control Operations Fund (991) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F022 - City of Chandler F026 - City of Phoenix F027 - City of Scottsdale F043 - Town of Queen Creek F108 - Sossaman Road F109 - Agua Fria River F117 - South Phoenix Drainage Improvement F118 - Arizona Canal Diversion Channel F121 - East Maricopa Floodway F126 - Salt/Gila River F201 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 F202 - McMicken Dam F207 - Buckeye FRS No. 1 F211 - Buckeye/Sun Valley ADMS F300 - Spook Hill FRS and Outlet F310 - Powerline FRS F343 - Wickenburg ADMP F346 - Hassayampa River F350 - Cave Buttes Dam F400 - Skunk Creek and New River F420 - Spook Hill ADMP F442 - East Mesa ADMP F450 - Glendale/Peoria ADMP F470 - White Tanks ADMP F480 - Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash ADMP F491 - Highley ADMP F565 - Durango ADMP F590 - Scatter Wash F620 - Maryvale ADMP F625- Metro ADMP F700 - Floodprone Property Assistance Program FCPR - Flood Control Project Reserve FY 2009-10 ADOPTED NON-RECURRING BUDGET 17 $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 40,627,383 40,627,383 $ $ Subtotal $ 105,000 5,000 315,000 40,000 30,000 10,000 635,000 560,000 5,640,000 55,000 1,088,000 10,000 1,480,000 162,000 100,000 1,340,000 10,000 25,000 345,000 560,000 2,693,000 5,825,000 5,325,000 17,540,000 4,323,000 10,000 2,524,000 5,000 2,518,000 2,297,000 1,565,000 2,860,000 60,000,000 $ 2,780,000 1,986,000 1,780,000 3,535,000 300,000 804,000 2,406,000 13,591,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 54,218,383 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Capital Improvement Program Summary The Flood Control District primarily mitigates existing regional flood hazards through its five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – the revolving five-year plan for accomplishing capital projects. The CIP drives design and construction of new infrastructure in concert with the District’s planning activities and also addresses modification and replacement of existing infrastructure. The District maintains its five-year CIP as mandated by state statutes and as directed by the District’s General Policies under District Resolutions 88-08 and 88-08A. Since 1993, proposed capital projects have been reviewed for merit by the District’s annual CIP Prioritization Procedure, although project recommendations resulting from this process are contingent upon ultimate project adoption through Resolutions by the District’s Board of Directors. The CIP Prioritization Procedure solicits and evaluates project requests from the District’s client communities and other local agencies, generally resulting from completed drainage planning studies. The evaluation procedure allocates points based on: • Significance within a master plan • Hydrologic/hydraulic significance • Level of protection • Area protected • Environmental quality • Area-wide benefit • Total project cost • Level of partner participation • Operation and maintenance costs • Operation and maintenance responsibility The process promotes a balanced approach to the evaluation of proposed projects, identifying and supporting flood control and regional drainage projects that not only provide long-term protection to individuals and property from flash floods and seasonal flooding, but that also promote community development, protect natural habitats and maintain watercourse flow paths. The procedure favors projects that involve cost-sharing partnerships, allowing the District to best leverage limited financial resources, and allows the District to limit future structural maintenance responsibilities to projects that are multi-jurisdictional, regional or involve main watercourses. 18 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Detail A total of 31 capital projects are identified and adopted to the Board by the Flood Control District. The adopted projects are as follows: Flood Control Capital Project F022 - CITY OF CHANDLER F026 - PHOENIX DAM SAFETY PROGRAM F027 - CITY OF SCOTTSDALE F043 - TOWN OF QUEEN CREEK F108 - SOSSAMAN CHANNEL F109 - AGUA FRIA RIVER F117 - S PHOENIX DRAINAGE IMPROVEMEN F118 - ARIZ CANAL DIVERSION CHANNEL F121 - EAST MARICOPA FLOODWAY F126 - SALT GILA RIVER F201 - WHITE TANKS DAM #4 F202 - MCMICKEN DAM F207 - BUCKEYE #1 F211 - BUCKEYE SUN VALLEY ADMP F265 - GRANITE REEF WASH F300 - SPOOK HILL FRS F310 - POWERLINE FRS F343 - WICKENBURG ADMS F346 - HASSAYAMPA RIVER F350 - CAVE BUTTES DAM F400 - SKUNK CREEK AND NEW RIVER F420 - SPOOK HILL ADMP F442 - EAST MESA ADMP F450 - GLENDALE PEORIA ADMP F470 - WHITE TANKS ADMP F480 - QUEEN CREEK ADMP F491 - HIGLEY ADMP F565 - DURANGO ADMP F590 - SCATTER WASH CHANNEL F620 - MARYVALE ADMP F625 - METRO ADMP SMALL PROJECTS ASSISTANCE F700 - FLOODPRONE PROP ACQUISITION FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT RESERVE TOTAL FUND 990 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Previous 4,976,810 67,544 36,039,501 54,494,224 1,934,312 2,248,560 12,040,885 12,811 15,709 257,102 391,297 68,878,091 8,807,768 33,473,620 64,087,600 96,137,081 19,326,486 5,077,836 14,609,288 2,526,886 74,950,274 3,973,533 504,327,218 Projected FY 08-09 $ 2,000 $ 681,000 $ 5,000 $ 35,000 $ 85,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,374,000 $ 616,000 $ 3,193,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,090,000 $ 576,000 $ 5,000 $ 217,000 $ $ 120,000 $ 250,000 $ 3,633,000 $ 41,000 $ $ 10,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 2,018,000 $ 10,275,000 $ 10,516,000 $ 986,000 $ 1,977,000 $ 8,267,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 24,000 $ $ 1,052,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 58,863,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 09-10 105,000 5,000 315,000 40,000 30,000 10,000 635,000 560,000 5,640,000 55,000 1,088,000 10,000 1,480,000 162,000 100,000 1,340,000 10,000 25,000 345,000 560,000 2,693,000 5,825,000 5,325,000 17,540,000 4,323,000 10,000 2,524,000 5,000 2,518,000 2,297,000 1,565,000 2,860,000 60,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 10-11 110,000 7,020,000 10,000 610,000 10,000 10,000 560,000 1,120,000 345,000 10,690,000 480,000 5,780,000 1,010,000 6,100,000 1,585,000 390,000 20,000 2,210,000 7,347,000 45,000 2,830,000 1,880,000 2,780,000 2,000,000 1,560,000 3,498,000 60,000,000 19 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 855,000 70,000 1,200,000 9,880,000 10,000 10,000 90,000 60,000 50,000 6,450,000 22,892,000 160,000 480,000 11,000,000 780,000 2,000,000 1,560,000 2,338,000 60,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 12-13 2,020,000 10,000 2,020,000 10,000 1,145,000 3,685,000 20,000 80,000 80,000 5,020,000 1,020,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 11,420,000 14,632,000 8,360,000 3,260,000 80,000 20,000 2,000,000 1,560,000 3,438,000 60,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 10,000 450,000 12,275,000 3,685,000 6,100,000 8,180,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 2,160,000 30,000 11,680,000 4,240,000 5,860,000 10,000 2,000,000 1,560,000 1,670,000 60,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 Year Total 2,255,000 5,000 7,365,000 2,090,000 640,000 490,000 645,000 1,130,000 20,245,000 8,625,000 17,968,000 9,950,000 17,220,000 6,212,000 1,040,000 100,000 7,630,000 10,000 25,000 2,010,000 560,000 5,343,000 5,845,000 25,435,000 74,091,000 17,128,000 10,000 14,954,000 5,000 15,478,000 5,887,000 8,000,000 7,805,000 13,804,000 300,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Project 7,233,810 753,544 7,370,000 2,125,000 725,000 495,000 38,058,501 1,746,000 77,932,224 11,709,312 21,306,560 22,566,885 17,237,811 6,444,709 1,040,000 477,102 7,880,000 3,643,000 457,297 2,010,000 69,448,091 21,550,768 41,336,620 99,797,600 180,744,081 37,440,486 7,064,836 37,830,288 2,536,886 92,233,274 9,884,533 8,000,000 8,857,000 15,254,000 863,190,218 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Managing for Results Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation program is to provide flood hazard protection through structural and non-structural solutions to the public so that they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property due to flooding. Strategic Goals By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Program Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Activities Supported • Capital Projects Result Measures Measure RESULT: Percent of Capital Dollars Expended FY 2008-09 Year-To-Date Actual 37% FY 2008-09 YearEnd Forecast 96% FY 2009-10 Budget 100% Results: District CIP MfR results are not applicable at the individual project level or across multiple fiscal years and must be presented as gross, individual fiscal year figures. The District’s Key Result Measure for the Capital Project activity reports the percent of total capital budget expended. By default, as it entails CIP expenditures, this project contributes to the results of that measure. Additionally, the District measures the percent of area benefitted by projects completed in a given fiscal year (compared to the area benefitted by all projects in the five-year CIP). The District has calculated a total of 754 square miles of area benefitted by projects in the five-year CIP; projects projected for fiscal year 2010 completion will benefit 112 square miles. 20 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: City of Chandler 022.01.32 - T1S/R5E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 022.01.32 022.01.32 022.01.32 022.01.32 - City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler FY 2013 Project Description: 022.01.32 - Central Chandler Storm Drain Improvements Recommended by the City of Chandler’s March 2006 Storm Water Master Plan Update, this project removes all local drainage connections to an existing Salt River Project “Chandler Drain” irrigation tailwater system and establishes a distinct City storm drain system. Improvements are contained within a two-square-mile area of downtown Chandler subject to historic flooding problems. The City of Chandler has contracted additional work to refine the master plan’s recommended solution and verify a 10-year level of protection for the affected area. Pending the outcome of that work, the District anticipates entering a cost-share agreement for design and construction of the project. Design funding is tentatively scheduled for Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals 4,976,810 4,976,810 $ $ Projected FY 08-09 2,000 2,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 105,000 105,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 110,000 110,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 21 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 2,020,000 2,020,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 2,255,000 2,255,000 $ $ Total Project 7,233,810 7,233,810 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: City of Phoenix 026.01.30 - T3N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3 026.01.30 026.01.30 026.01.30 026.01.30 - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2010 Project Description: 026.01.30 - City of Phoenix Dam No. 7 Rehabilitation The City of Phoenix owns and operates four flood control dams that are of sufficient height and storage capacity to be classified as jurisdictional by the Arizona Department of Water Resources: Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7, East Park Dam, West Park Dam and North Mountain Flood Detention Dam No. 3. Safety assessments of these dams performed by the City under IGA FCD 2004A018 recommended rehabilitation of Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7 and implementation of minor dam safety improvements of the remaining jurisdictional dams. Phoenix Detention Basin No. 7, located in the North Mountain Preserve, provides flood protection to downstream areas for up to the 100-year flood event. This earth embankment dam is about 1,000 feet in length with a maximum height of 31 feet and a storage capacity of 120 acre-feet. An un-gated low level drain pipe (primary outlet) through the dam releases floodwaters captured in the impoundment at a rate of about 50 cubic feet per second (cfs) to a downstream natural channel. Dam rehabilitation includes adding a central filter into the existing earth dam, repair work of the dam embankment, removal of existing trees and large tree roots in accordance with current dam safety practices, and installation of new trash racks on the primary outlet of each of the four City jurisdictional dams. The design is complete, and construction has begun. Construction completion is anticipated prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation 22 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals 67,544 67,544 $ $ Projected FY 08-09 681,000 681,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 5,000 5,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 23 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 5,000 5,000 $ $ Total Project 753,544 753,544 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: City of Scottsdale 027.10.32 - T3N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 2 027.10.32 027.10.32 027.10.32 027.10.32 - City of Scottsdale City of Scottsdale City of Scottsdale FY 2012 Project Description: 027.10.32 – Upper Camelback Wash Flood Hazard Mitigation The City of Scottsdale’s Storm Water Master Plan recommended improvements to mitigate flooding hazards in the Upper Camelback Wash watershed. Conveyance capacity of the existing system of open channels and street conveyance is limited to a 2-year event level in some areas, creating a flood hazard for an estimated 600 structures. The proposed project will improve system capacity to convey the 100-year storm event. In advance of District participation, the City initiated design of the project, acquired rights-of-way and, during the widening of Cactus Road, constructed box culverts to accommodate the project. Project IGAs remain to be negotiated. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals - Projected FY 08-09 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 315,000 315,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 7,020,000 7,020,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 24 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 7,365,000 7,365,000 $ $ Total Project 7,370,000 7,370,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Town of Queen Creek 043.XX.X1 – T2S/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 043.XX.X1 043.XX.X1 043.XX.X1 043.XX.X1 – Town of Queen Creek - Town of Queen Creek - Town of Queen Creek - FY 2013 Project Description: 043.XX.X1 – Cloud Rd. and Sossaman Rd. Basin and Outlet The Town of Queen Creek completed the Cloud Road Channel capacity study in March 2003. The study recommended construction of a new basin and outlet in the area of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road to mitigate historical flooding to nearby homes along Cloud Road to the west. The project consists of a basin located at approximately the southeast corner of Cloud Road and Sossaman Road and an outlet along Sossaman Road from the basin site north to Sonoqui Wash. The project would provide 100-year flood protection for over 120 homes in the area as well as protect public infrastructure including roads and utilities. Design is anticipated to begin prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals - Projected FY 08-09 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 40,000 40,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 10,000 10,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 25 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 2,020,000 2,020,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 2,090,000 2,090,000 $ $ Total Project 2,125,000 2,125,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Sossaman Road 108.XX.X1 – T1S/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 2 108.XX.X1 108.XX.X1 108.XX.X1 108.XX.X1 – Flood Control District - None - Flood Control District - FY 2011 Project Description: 108.XX.X1 – Sossaman Road Channel Improvements The segment of the existing Sossaman Road Channel between Baseline Road and Guadalupe Road is earthen with concrete grade-control structures. It was designed and built as part of a Maricopa County Highway Department project for Sossaman Road in 1981, to convey regional storm water flows. It is located in the mid-length portion of the three mile long Sossaman/Guadalupe channel and basin system, which the District owns, operates and maintains. District staff have identified cracking, undermining and buckling of some of the concrete structures, erosion of channel bottom and banks, nuisance water ponding areas and other evidence of channel functional distresses. During a storm event, the structural failure of a channel feature could compromise the channel’s structural integrity and the level of flood safety provided by the Sossaman/Guadalupe system. The District initiated a study to identify repair and improvement alternatives to increase the structure’s life span. Design is anticipated to be complete in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals - Projected FY 08-09 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 30,000 30,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 610,000 610,000 26 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 640,000 640,000 $ $ Total Project 725,000 725,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 27 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Agua Fria River 109.02.30 – T1N/R1W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 5 109.02.30 109.02.30 109.02.30 109.02.30 – – – – City of Avondale City of Avondale City of Avondale Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 109.02.30 – Agua Fria River Levee Safety Mitigation Channelization of the Agua Fria River, completed by the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1980s, included construction of soil cement levees. The District entered IGA 2001A009 with the City of Avondale, granting the City a non-exclusive easement over certain District fee-held land, including channelized portions of the Agua Fria River, to facilitate construction of a City trail system. Maintenance of the Agua Fria River levees poses a hazard to District personnel, as the levees were originally constructed without pipe rail fall protection, and a trail atop the levees would pose a similar hazard to the public. IGA FCD 2008A009 establishes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the District for installation of pipe rail along levees between Buckeye Rd. and McDowell Rd. The District’s cost share is capped at $440,000, including a per-foot ceiling. The City, under the IGA, acts as lead agency for installation of the pipe rail, and retains operation and maintenance responsibility over the installed railing. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Project Total $ Previous Actuals - Projected FY 08-09 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 10,000 10,000 28 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 450,000 450,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 490,000 490,000 $ $ Total Project 495,000 495,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 29 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: User Department: South Phoenix Drainage Improvement Flood Control District of Maricopa County Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 117.09.31 5 117.09.31 117.09.31 117.09.31 117.09.31 - T1N/R2E - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2010 Project Description: 117.09.31 - 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Storm Drain and Detention Basin The 23rd Avenue/Roeser Road Detention Basin & Storm Drain is identified as an element of regional flood control infrastructure as defined by the recommended plan for the South Phoenix/Laveen Drainage Improvement Project. A proposed 10-acre detention basin, to be located on the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Roeser Road, will intercept flows from the north and the east. The basin will be designed to intercept flows from a 100-year storm and will then discharge flows into a storm drain system to be constructed along Roeser Road between 27th Avenue and Broadway Road. This storm drain will then discharge into an existing 108-inch storm drain that will convey the flows from Broadway Road to the Salt River. The City of Phoenix is the lead agency for all project tasks and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. The City and District are sharing equally in project costs. Design is complete, and storm drain construction is expected to be completed prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Basin construction completion is anticipated during Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 30 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 25,739,987 10,299,514 Project Total $ 36,039,501 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,374,000 $ 1,374,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 635,000 635,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 10,000 10,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 31 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 645,000 645,000 $ $ Total Project 27,758,987 10,299,514 38,058,501 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Arizona Canal Diversion Channel 118.01.30 - T3N/R2E, T3N/R3E, T2N/R3E, T2N/R4E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3, 4 118.01.30 118.01.30 118.01.30 118.01.30 - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix FY 2011 Project Description: 118.01.30 – Arizona Canal Diversion Channel (ACDC) Storm Drain Improvements The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the District, constructed the ACDC in the 1980s. The District owns, operates and maintains the channel. Storm drain inlet pipes have begun to exhibit cracking along vertical-walled segments of the ACDC. This cracking, if unaddressed, will allow storm water flows to enter the wall backfill to saturate and further consolidate, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the 20-foot vertical wall. This project will address this deficiency and will involve engineered storm drain improvements to extend the life of the channel wall. The project is phased to allow for the exploration of multiple solutions. The project will be accomplished unilaterally by the District. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 08-09 $ 616,000 $ 616,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 560,000 560,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 560,000 560,000 32 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 Year 4 FY 12-13 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 1,130,000 1,130,000 $ $ Total Project 1,746,000 1,746,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 33 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District East Maricopa Floodway 121.03.32 - T1S/R6E 121.03.33 - T2S/R6E 121.XX.X1 – T1N/R6E, T1S/R6E, T1S/R7E, T2S/R6E 1, 2 121.03.32 - Flood Control District 121.03.33 - Flood Control District 121.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 121.03.32 - Town of Gilbert 121.03.33 – None 121.XX.X1 - None 121.03.32 - Flood Control District 121.03.33 - Flood Control District 121.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 121.03.32 - Outside Five-Year CIP 121.03.33 - Outside Five-Year CIP 121.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 121.03.32 - Rittenhouse Basin The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins - the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins - to mitigate EMF flows. Rittenhouse Basin construction is being accomplished in multiple phases. Design and the first phase of construction have been completed, and the second phase of construction is in progress, with completion expected during Fiscal Year 2010. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, the Town of Gilbert will fund recreational amenities and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations. The District anticipates the Town will purchase an easement on the 160-acre basin site prior to Fiscal Year 2010, generating approximately $11 Million in District revenue and partially offsetting the project’s cost. 121.03.33 - Chandler Heights Basin The District's East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) Mitigation Study identified drainage and flooding issues associated with the 15,000 cfs 100-year flow exceeding the EMF's 8,500 cfs capacity. The study proposed two large off-line detention basins - the Rittenhouse and Chandler Heights Basins - to mitigate EMF flows. 34 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Chandler Heights Basin reduces flows from the Queen Creek and Sonoqui washes into the EMF. Construction is being accomplished in five phases. Design and the first two phases of construction have been completed. Future phases of construction will involve excavation of an additional 3 million cubic yards of material, and will be accomplished as funding becomes available. Although basin construction is being accomplished by the District alone, it is anticipated that the Town of Gilbert will purchase an easement on the completed basin site, fund recreational amenities, and assume certain operation and maintenance obligations in the future. 121.XX.X1 – East Maricopa Floodway Low Flow Channel The United States Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) completed the East Maricopa Floodway (EMF) in 1989 in partnership with the District and others. This 27-mile long earthen channel runs parallel to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District canal from north of Brown Road to Hunt Highway, and continues in a southwesterly direction through the Gila River Indian Community to an outlet at the Gila River. The EMF is a principal flood control feature for the east valley, intercepting floodwater flow impacting the Buckhorn-Mesa, Apache Junction-Gilbert and Williams-Chandler watersheds. The EMF is operated and maintained by the District, with the exception of segments that run through privately-owned golf courses. Due to the topography of the area, the EMF has a particularly shallow slope. Combined with the EMF’s earthen bottom, this causes nuisance ponding along much of the structure. In addition to causing mosquito control issues, this creates maintenance difficulties, as maintenance equipment is unable to function in the saturated channel bottom. The District intends to modify the EMF’s drop structures, construct a concrete low flow channel and construct associated low flow inlet features to capture and convey nuisance flows while facilitating proper maintenance. Implementation will be phased, with a first phase of construction anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010 or Fiscal Year 2011. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 35 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 54,294,224 200,000 Project Total $ 54,494,224 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 3,193,000 $ 3,193,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 5,640,000 5,640,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 1,120,000 1,120,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 36 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 65,000 65,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 1,145,000 1,145,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 12,275,000 12,275,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 20,245,000 20,245,000 $ $ Total Project 77,732,224 200,000 77,932,224 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Salt / Gila River 126.01.31 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E 126.02.30 - T1N/R2W, T1S/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: 5 126.01.31 - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, City of Phoenix 126.02.30 - Flood Control District 126.01.31 - City of Phoenix 126.02.30 - BWCDD, Town of Buckeye (Pending/Unapproved) 126.01.31 - Flood Control District 126.02.30 - TBD 126.01.31 - Outside Five-Year CIP 126.02.30 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 126.01.31 - Tres Rios The Tres Rios Project is a federal project under the auspices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and sponsored locally by the City of Phoenix. The project is located along the Salt and Gila rivers, from about 83rd Avenue to the Agua Fria River, and consists of the restoration of habitat within and along the river. It involves construction of wetlands; open water marshes and riparian corridors; and a flood control levee along the north bank of the river from approximately 105th Avenue to the Agua Fria River to remove property and homes along the river from the floodplain. The District's participation in accordance with the project resolution and IGA includes design review and coordination, $2 million in levee construction funding, operation and maintenance of the levee, and contribution of District-owned land required for the project. The levee design and construction will occur in three phases - from 105th to 115th Avenue, 115th to 123rd Avenue, and 123rd to 137th Avenue. Construction of the first two phases is complete. Construction of the third phase has not yet been scheduled, and District participation will likely be limited to design review. 126.01.31 – Gila River Bank Stabilization The District, in cooperation with the City of Avondale, City of Goodyear, and Town of Buckeye, completed the El Rio Watercourse Master Plan (WCMP) in 2006. The El Rio WCMP outlines a recommended alternative for managing the 17.5 miles of the Gila River from the confluence with the Agua Fria River to the State Route 85 Bridge. The recommended alternative includes soft structural levee/bank protection, floodplain management, vegetation management, and facilitates recreational and wildlife habitat enhancements. 37 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District This project, jointly requested by the Town of Buckeye and the Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, implements the portion of the levee/bank protection recommended in the El Rio WCMP from the 175th Avenue alignment to Jackrabbit Trail. The District has initiated a pre-design effort for the bank protection from the Citrus Road alignment to the Perryville Road alignment. Intergovernmental agreements with project partners are required before final design, rights-of-way acquisition, and construction are initiated. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 1,835,158 99,154 Project Total $ 1,934,312 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 55,000 55,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 220,000 125,000 345,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 38 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 730,000 125,000 855,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 1,935,000 1,750,000 3,685,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 1,935,000 1,750,000 3,685,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 4,875,000 3,750,000 8,625,000 $ $ Total Project 7,860,158 3,849,154 11,709,312 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: White Tanks FRS No. 4 201.01.31 - T1N/R2W, T1S/R2W 201.02.31 T1N/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: 4 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 201.01.31 201.02.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: – Flood Control District - Flood Control District - TBD - NRCS - TBD - Flood Control District – Outside Five-Year CIP - FY 2012 Project Description: 201.01.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Outlet Channel The District’s Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) examined alternatives to convey flows from White Tanks FRS No. 4’s impoundment area to the Gila River. The ADMP recommends a channel designed to intercept and convey the 100-year flood flow along its length, while simultaneously serving as an outlet to the dam. Construction of a facility serving solely as an outlet to the dam remains a feasible alternative satisfying dam safety requirements, although it would not provide the regional flood protection intended by the ADMP. The alternative ultimately implemented depends on partnering opportunities, primarily with the Town of Buckeye. Advance land acquisition is scheduled late in the five-year budget. 201.02.31 - White Tanks FRS No. 4 Rehabilitation White Tanks Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No. 4 was constructed in 1954 by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (then Soil Conservation Service). By agreement, the District operates and maintains the structure. The District completed Phase I Assessments for White Tanks FRS No. 4, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (state agency with regulatory authority) classified the dam as having safety deficiencies; corrective action is required to bring the dam into compliance with dam safety standards and requirements. Deficiencies include transverse cracking of the embankment, inadequate left and right spillways and unprotected corrugated metal pipe outlets. NRCS identified these same deficiencies as requiring corrective action. The District submitted an application to NRCS for federal funding assistance under Public Law 106-472 (Small Watershed Amendment) in May 2004. The District has entered into a watershed agreement with NRCS as a precursor to an intergovernmental agreement, and design is in progress. Construction notice to proceed is anticipated late in Fiscal Year 2010, contingent upon negotiation of an intergovernmental agreement with NRCS, committing NRCS funds. 39 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • • • Capital Projects Dam Safety Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 2,248,560 Project Total $ 2,248,560 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,090,000 $ 1,090,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 1,088,000 1,088,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 890,000 9,800,000 10,690,000 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 70,000 $ $ 70,000 $ Year 4 FY 12-13 20,000 20,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 6,100,000 6,100,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 8,168,000 9,800,000 17,968,000 Total Project 11,506,560 9,800,000 21,306,560 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ 3,053 3,000 6,053 $ $ $ 3,053 3,000 $ $ 6,053 $ $ - $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Year 1 FY 09-10 $ $ $ 40 Year 2 FY 10- 11 6,106 6,000 12,106 $ $ 106,106 53,000 159,106 100,000 47,000 147,000 Year 3 FY 11-12 6,320 6,210 12,530 $ $ $ 109,820 54,855 $ $ $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 6,541 6,427 12,968 $ $ $ 113,663 56,775 $ 164,675 $ 170,438 103,500 48,645 152,145 $ 107,123 50,348 157,470 $ $ $ 117,642 58,762 $ 121,759 60,819 $ 126,021 62,947 $ 176,404 $ 182,578 $ 188,968 $ 110,872 52,110 162,982 $ 114,752 53,934 $ 168,686 $ 536,247 252,036 $ 788,282 $ $ $ Total Project 7,007 6,885 $ 13,892 $ 6,770 6,652 13,422 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ 35,796 35,175 70,971 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: McMicken Dam 202.02.31 - T3N/R2W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 202.02.31 202.02.31 202.02.31 202.02.31 - Flood Control District USACE (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 202.02.31 - McMicken Dam Project The McMicken Dam Project was constructed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers in 1954 and 1955 to protect Luke Air Force Base, the Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility and agricultural activities in the area from flooding; it also provides flood protection for critical public facilities and infrastructure including hospitals, schools, police and fire stations, freeways and other public roadways, railroads and the Beardsley Canal. The McMicken Dam Project includes McMicken Dam itself (approximately nine miles in length), the McMicken Dam Outlet Channel (approximately six miles in length) and the McMicken Dam Outlet Wash (approximately four miles in length) that discharges to the Agua Fria River. The ability of the McMicken Dam Project to maintain the current level of flood protection for the benefit of the public in an increasingly urbanized environment is in question due to significant concerns regarding aging infrastructure, land subsidence, earth fissuring, urbanization encroachment and current dam safety standards. These dam safety issues have led the District to determine that an overall rehabilitation or replacement of the dam is required. Alternatives may include a modified dam, floodways or basins which will provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The District has pursued, and continues to pursue, federal funding assistance for this project. Project planning will include the coordination of any interested stakeholders for the incorporation of a recreational cost share component to the rehabilitation project. Design for the dam's rehabilitation or replacement is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2011, followed by phased construction several years thereafter. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation 41 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 12,040,885 Project Total $ 12,040,885 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA $ Projected FY 08-09 576,000 $ 576,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 480,000 480,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 42 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 1,200,000 1,200,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 80,000 80,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 8,180,000 8,180,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 9,950,000 9,950,000 $ $ Total Project 22,566,885 22,566,885 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Buckeye FRS No. 1 207.01.31 - T1N/R3W, T1N/R4W, T1N/R5W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 207.01.31 207.01.31 207.01.31 207.01.31 - Flood Control District NRCS (Potential/Unapproved) Flood Control District Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 207.01.31 - Buckeye FRS No. 1 Rehabilitation Buckeye FRS No.1 is the westernmost of a series of three flood control dams designed and built by the Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS) between 1973 and 1975. The dam is located along the southern slopes of the White Tank Mountains and parallels the north side of Interstate 10 for 7.1 miles west to the Hassayampa River. The dam is operated and maintained by the District and is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Since its construction, the dam has experienced considerable transverse cracking. ADWR has identified the transverse cracking in Buckeye FRS No.1 as a dam safety deficiency requiring corrective action. The District completed Phase I Assessments of the dam, and has requested NRCS federal cost share assistance under Public Law 106-472 for a rehabilitation project to address dam safety concerns and to maintain flood control benefits to downstream properties for the next 100 years. The District completed a planning-level assessment of potential alternatives, including a modified dam, a channel/levee system and combinations of both providing a minimum of 100-year flood protection. The selected alternative consists of dam rehabilitation. Design is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety 43 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 12,811 Project Total $ 12,811 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 1,480,000 1,480,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 780,000 5,000,000 5,780,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 44 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 2,880,000 7,000,000 9,880,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 80,000 80,000 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 5,220,000 12,000,000 17,220,000 $ $ Total Project 5,237,811 12,000,000 17,237,811 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Buckeye / Sun Valley ADMP 211.03.31 - T1S/R3W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 211.03.31 211.03.31 211.03.31 211.03.31 - Town of Buckeye Town of Buckeye Town of Buckeye FY 2014 Project Description: 211.03.31 - Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain Project The Town of Buckeye historically experienced flooding conditions downtown in the vicinity of Monroe Avenue (MC 85). The District completed a Candidate Assessment Report that identified potential structural solutions: a 10-year storm drain system and outfall, and 100-year retention basins. This project will relieve historic downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure that will mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. The project's IGA commits the District to provide 50 percent reimbursement to the Town of Buckeye (the project's lead agency). Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 15,709 Project Total $ 15,709 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Projected FY 08-09 217,000 $ 217,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 162,000 162,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 1,010,000 1,010,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 45 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 5,020,000 5,020,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 6,212,000 6,212,000 $ $ Total Project 6,444,709 6,444,709 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Granite Reef Wash 265.XX.X1 - T2N/R4E, T1N/R4E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 2 265.XX.X1 265.XX.X1 265.XX.X1 265.XX.X1 - City of Scottsdale City of Scottsdale (Pending) City of Scottsdale Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 265.XX.X1 – Granite Reef Wash Drainage Mitigation Project The City of Scottsdale has historically experienced flooding in developed areas along Granite Reef Wash. The City initiated a study to propose solutions to this flooding hazard, and has recommended installation of a drainage system, principally along the Pima Road alignment, from Thomas Road south to Salt River. In addition to mitigating flooding in the immediate residential area, the project would reduce flood flows to the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community’s (SRPMIC’s) undeveloped Section Twelve, at the junction of SR-101L and SR-202L. Prior to entering an IGA with the District, the City will obtain SRPMIC agreement and is attempting to identify additional funding sources to generate a combined 50-percent funding match. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ Projected FY 08-09 - $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 - $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 - $ - $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 46 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 10,000 10,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 1,020,000 1,020,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 1,040,000 1,040,000 $ $ Total Project 1,040,000 1,040,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Spook Hill FRS and Outlet 300.01.31 - T1N/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: 2 300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - Flood Control District, Arizona Department of Transportation 300.01.31 - FY 2010 Completion Date: Project Description: 300.01.31 - Spook Hill FRS / Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202L) Modification Spook Hill FRS is a structural plan element of a Watershed Work Plan, prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) in January 1963, for the Buckhorn-Mesa Watershed Project located in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The dam was designed to impound floodwaters for a 100-year flood event and direct flows in excess of the 100-year flood event through an emergency spillway. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) was the lead agency in an effort to modify Spook Hill FRS to accommodate construction of the Power Road to University Drive segment of the Loop 202 freeway, which passes over the dam and within the dam's floodway. Modifications were completed in Fiscal Year 2009 and corrected all identified dam safety deficiencies through installation of a central filter throughout the dam to protect against cracking, slope erosion repair, and replacement of the principal spillway. The District will provide easements to ADOT on District land, generating revenue that is expected to completely offset its $5 million contribution to the modification costs. Easement value is under legal negotiation, and the project remains active pending settlement. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety 47 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 257,102 Project Total $ 257,102 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Projected FY 08-09 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 100,000 100,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 48 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 100,000 100,000 $ $ Total Project 477,102 477,102 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Powerline FRS 310.01.30 - T1S/R8E, T2S/R8E 310.XX.X1 - T1S/R8E County District(s): Managing Department: 1 310.01.30 - Flood Control District 310.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 310.01.30 - NRCS (Pending/Unapproved) 310.XX.X1 - None 310.01.30 - Flood Control District 310.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 310.01.30 - Outside Five-Year CIP 310.XX.X1 – FY 2011 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Project Description: 310.01.30 – PVR FRS Rehabilitation/Replacement The Powerline, Vineyard Road, and Rittenhouse (PVR) Flood Retarding Structures (FRSs) are located in northwest Pinal County, south of Apache Junction and parallel to the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal between Baseline Road and Ocotillo Road. Per its agreements with the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resources Conservation Service, or NRCS), the District operates and maintains the structures. The FRSs protect approximately 169 square miles of residential, commercial, and agricultural land in Maricopa and Pinal Counties from being flooded, and protect structures such as the CAP canal, Williams Gateway Airport, and the Loop 202 San Tan Freeway. The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently reclassified the PVR FRSs as high hazard potential, medium size structures. The District prepared a Final Failure Mode Analysis Report, Structures Assessment Program Phase I (FFMA), in July 2002, that identified defects in the structures due to the age of the structures, proximity to fissures, subsidence of the area and cracking caused by drying shrinkage. The FFMA recommended rehabilitation of the structures which could include structural improvements to the dam or replacement of the dams with channels, basins or other flood control facilities. The District anticipates initiating a study in Fiscal Year 2010 to propose an ultimate recommended solution for the structures. Following alternative selection, the District would pursue federal cost share funding, with implementation likely occurring outside the Five-Year CIP. 310.XX.X1 - Powerline FRS Fissure Risk Zone Mitigation The District identified an earth fissure at Powerline FRS leading the Arizona Department of Water Resources to classify the dam as “unsafe, non-emergency, elevated risk.” Appropriate flood ALERT inspection and warning procedures have been put in place for this sitespecific condition at the dam. The District anticipates site-specific dam safety remedial work, otherwise known as interim dam safety measures, will be required to assure the safety of the dam until its overall rehabilitation or replacement. Remedial work will likely include engineered, preventative revisions to a segment of the dam. 49 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Implementation is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 08-09 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 1,340,000 1,340,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 6,100,000 6,100,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 50 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 90,000 90,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 50,000 50,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 50,000 50,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 7,630,000 7,630,000 $ $ Total Project 7,880,000 7,880,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Wickenburg ADMP 343.01.31 - T7N/R5W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 343.01.31 343.01.31 343.01.31 343.01.31 - Flood Control District Town of Wickenburg Town of Wickenburg FY 2009 Project Description: 343.01.31 - Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation The Wickenburg Downtown Flooding Hazard Mitigation project includes approximately 5,000 feet of channel and levee improvements to capture the floodplain associated with Sol’s Wash and a tributary, Hospital Wash, and convey 100-year flows from upstream of Tegner Street to the Hassayampa River. The project provides a 100-year level of protection to portions of the Wickenburg downtown area subject to flooding and will provide flood control benefits along much of Sol’s Wash within the Wickenburg town limits. It also conveys the 100-year flows to the Highway 93 Interim Bypass Bridge over Sol’s Wash, allowing the Interim Bypass embankment to be constructed as a levee to contain the Hassayampa River floodplain in the area. Construction was completed in Fiscal Year 2009. The project remains active pending a condemnation court action anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 51 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 08-09 $ 3,608,000 25,000 $ 3,633,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 10,000 10,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ $ $ 5-Year Total 10,000 10,000 Year 4 FY 12-13 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ 4,706 $ 1,251 $ 5,957 $ $ - $ Total Project 3,618,000 25,000 3,643,000 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ 4,101 1,090 5,191 $ $ $ 4,101 1,090 $ $ 5,191 $ $ - $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Year 1 FY 09-10 $ $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 4,245 1,128 5,373 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ $ 4,393 1,168 5,561 $ 4,547 1,209 5,755 5,245 1,628 6,873 $ $ 5,429 1,685 $ $ 5,619 1,744 $ 7,114 $ 1,000 500 1,500 $ 1,035 517 1,553 $ $ $ Total Project $ $ 4,871 1,295 6,165 $ 26,862 7,140 34,002 $ 5,815 $ 1,805 $ $ 6,019 1,868 $ $ 6,229 1,934 7,363 $ 7,620 $ 7,887 $ 8,163 1,072 535 1,607 $ 1,109 554 $ 1,663 $ 1,148 574 1,722 $ 5,365 2,680 8,045 $ $ Project 343.09.39 acquired a floodprone property, which will be demolished. The vacant land will be maintained by the District, or sold at some future date if appropriate. 52 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Hassayampa River WCMP 346.07.39 - T1S/R5W County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 346.07.39 - Flood Control District None 346.07.39 - Flood Control District 346.07.39 - FY 2010 Project Description: 346.07.39 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Parker (APN 401-28004B) Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2008 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District purchased the property in Fiscal Year 2008. Demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation are expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 53 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 391,297 Project Total $ 391,297 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Projected FY 08-09 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 25,000 25,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ 5-Year Total 25,000 25,000 Year 4 FY 12-13 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ $ - $ $ Total Project 457,297 457,297 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ Year 2 FY 10- 11 - $ 1,000 500 1,500 $ 1,000 500 1,500 $ $ $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ 1,035 518 1,553 $ 1,035 518 1,553 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 1,071 536 1,607 $ 1,109 554 $ 1,663 $ 1,071 536 1,607 $ 1,109 554 $ 1,663 $ $ $ Total Project - $ 1,148 574 1,721 $ 1,148 574 1,721 $ $ $ $ - 1,188 594 1,782 5,362 2,681 8,044 Project 346.07.39 acquired a floodprone property, which will be demolished. The vacant land will be maintained by the District, or sold at some future date if appropriate. 54 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Cave Buttes Dam 350.XX.X1 – T4N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3 350.XX.X1 350.XX.X1 350.XX.X1 350.XX.X1 - Flood Control District None Flood Control District FY 2012 Project Description: 350.XX.X1 – Cave Buttes Dam Modifications Cave Buttes Dam was constructed by the District in 1980, functionally replacing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1923-era Cave Creek Dam. A substantial flood event in 1993 resulted in a significant impoundment of water behind the dam, and seepage occurred along the dam’s left abutment. To prevent deterioration of embankment material from recurring seepage, the District pursued an analysis and investigation of the issue. This investigation has indicated that permanent modification to the dam is required. Modification will likely include the construction of a gated outlet with a drainage channel and a seepage collection system at the downstream abutment contacts. Final design is anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010, with construction immediately following. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Flood Control Capital Projects Dam Safety Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ Projected FY 08-09 - $ $ - $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 345,000 345,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 1,585,000 1,585,000 55 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 60,000 60,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 20,000 20,000 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 2,010,000 2,010,000 $ $ Total Project 2,010,000 2,010,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 56 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Skunk Creek and New River 400.06.31 - T3N/R1E, T4N/R1E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 4 400.06.31 400.06.31 400.06.31 400.06.31 - City of Peoria City of Peoria City of Peoria FY 2010 Project Description: 400.06.31 - New River (Grand Ave. to Skunk Creek, Including Paradise Shores) The Middle New River Watercourse Master Plan (MNRWCMP) study, undertaken by the District, identified projects to improve the conveyance capacity of New River and provide bank protection. Improvements include channelization and bank protection for approximately two miles of New River and an 800-foot reach on the west side of New River south of Bell Road. With the City of Peoria as a project partner, construction has been completed with the exception of channelization at the Thunderbird Road crossing. The City of Peoria is acting as the lead agency for construction at Thunderbird Road, being completed in conjunction with road improvements. District reimbursement to the City is projected in Fiscal Year 2010 following the completion of construction. This is the last reach of the New River that has not been improved consistent with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' “Phoenix, Arizona and Vicinity including New River” project. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 65,257,476 3,620,615 Project Total $ 68,878,091 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA $ Projected FY 08-09 10,000 $ 10,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 560,000 560,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ 57 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 560,000 560,000 $ $ Total Project 65,827,476 3,620,615 69,448,091 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 58 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District Spook Hill ADMP 420.02.31 - T1N/R7E 420.03.31 - T1N/R7E 420.XX.X1 - T1N/R7E 420.XX.X2 - T1N/R7E 2 420.02.31 - Flood Control District 420.03.31 - Flood Control District 420.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 420.XX.X2 – Flood Control District 420.02.31 - City of Mesa 420.03.31 - City of Mesa 420.XX.X1 - City of Mesa (Potential/Unapproved) 420.XX.X2 - City of Mesa (Potential/Unapproved) 420.02.31 - Flood Control District, City of Mesa 420.03.31 - Flood Control District, City of Mesa 420.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 420.XX.X2 – City of Mesa 420.02.31 - FY 2010 420.03.31 - FY 2010 420.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP 420.XX.X2 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 420.02.31 - Hermosa Vista / Hawes Road Drainage System The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road Storm Drain and Basin project is the first scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a storm drain from Spook Hill FRS, along Hermosa Vista Drive, Hawes Road and McDowell Road. The storm drain connects to a local basin and a detention basin constructed at Hawes Road and Culver Street as a component of this project. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the McDowell Road and Oak Street projects. Construction is expected to be substantially completed prior to Fiscal Year 2010. 420.03.31 - McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain System 59 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The McDowell Road Basin and Storm Drain project is the second scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at McDowell Road and 76th Street (Sossaman Road) and a storm drain east along McDowell Road to Hawes Road. This project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and Oak Street projects. Construction is in progress, with completion anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010. 420.XX.X1 – Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Oak Street Detention Basin and Storm Drain project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and involves construction of a basin at Oak Street and Hawes Road, and storm drains east along Oak Street and north along Hawes Road. The project will provide protection in conjunction with drainage infrastructure constructed by the Hermosa Vista/Hawes Road and McDowell Road projects. Design is anticipated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010, pending the formulation of an IGA between the District and the City of Mesa. Construction schedule will be driven by City funding authorization under a future City bond. 420.XX.X2 – Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road Drainage Improvements The Spook Hill Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP), completed in 2002, identified regional flood control infrastructure necessary for a 35-square-mile area located in northeast Mesa. The ADMP watershed extends from the Usery Mountains on the north and the Apache Trail on the east, to the BuckhornMesa structures on the west and south. The Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road project is the third scheduled project in support of this ADMP and likely will involve construction of a basin at Ellsworth Road and McKellips Road, and storm drains south along Ellsworth Road and east along McKellips Road. The basin rights-of-way are in place, owned by the City of Mesa. The project will provide protection to local, previously-developed subdivisions, where historic flooding has been noted. A design concept report is anticipated to begin prior to Fiscal Year 2010, to be accomplished unilaterally by the District. This effort will accomplish an update to the ADMP for the subject project. Final design and construction schedules will be driven by City funding authorization under a future City bond. 60 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 8,422,842 384,926 Project Total $ 8,807,768 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 5,582,000 1,818,000 $ 7,400,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 368,000 2,325,000 2,693,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 250,000 140,000 390,000 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 50,000 50,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 50,000 50,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 1,460,000 700,000 2,160,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 2,178,000 3,165,000 5,343,000 $ $ Total Project 16,182,842 5,367,926 21,550,768 Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ $ - - - $ $ $ Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay - Year 1 FY 09-10 $ $ $ 20,000 9,000 29,000 20,000 9,000 29,000 Year 2 FY 10- 11 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 20,700 9,315 30,015 20,700 9,315 30,015 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 21,425 9,641 31,066 21,425 9,641 31,066 Year 4 FY 12-13 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 22,174 9,978 32,153 22,174 9,978 32,153 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 22,950 10,328 33,278 22,950 10,328 33,278 Total Project $ $ $ $ $ $ - 23,754 10,689 34,443 107,249 48,262 155,512 Projects 420.02.31 and 420.03.31 are anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2010. Components of these projects in unincorporated Maricopa County will be operated and maintained by the District; components in the City of Mesa will be operated and maintained by the City of Mesa. 61 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: East Mesa ADMP 442.11.31 - T1S/R7E, T1S/R8E 442.12.31 - T1N/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: 1, 2 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 442.11.31 442.12.31 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District - Flood Control District - City of Mesa - None – Flood Control District, City of Mesa - Flood Control District - Outside Five-Year CIP - FY 2011 Project Description: 442.11.31 - Siphon Draw Drainage Improvements The Siphon Draw project is the final element of the recommended plan for the East Mesa ADMP for the area south of the Superstition Freeway and north of Warner Road. The project includes a channel along Meridian Road that intercepts the flow entering Maricopa County from Pinal County and conveys the flow to a detention basin constructed east of Meridian Road and north of Elliot Road. Construction of the basin is anticipated to begin prior to Fiscal Year 2010 with the City of Mesa as a project partner. Construction of the channel along Meridian Road will follow, likely in phases, pending partnering agreements. 442.12.31 - East Mesa Drain Reaches 4 and 7 Modification In June 1994, the District assumed maintenance responsibility (previously held by MCDOT) for the East Mesa Drains, 11 dedicated local drainage easements in Unincorporated Maricopa County. The District conducted a Candidate Assessment Report (CAR) in April 2004 to investigate improvement alternatives to mitigate the extensive maintenance costs associated with the drains. The consensus of the District identified Reaches 4 and 7 as the best targets for structural improvements to decrease maintenance costs. The bottom and side slopes of the Reach 4 channel have experienced scour erosion maintenance complications associated with trees and trash; the Reach 7 channel has experienced chronic erosion from inflows across its east bank. The project will be unilateral and will likely include installation of concrete lining. Design is being completed in part by District staff, and construction is anticipated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2011. 62 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 26,424,986 7,048,634 Project Total $ 33,473,620 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA $ Projected FY 08-09 704,000 1,314,000 $ 2,018,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 2,759,000 3,066,000 5,825,000 $ Year 2 FY 10-11 20,000 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 $ 20,000 $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ $ 5-Year Total 2,779,000 3,066,000 5,845,000 $ $ Total Project 29,907,986 11,428,634 41,336,620 Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ - - - Year 1 FY 09-10 $ - $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 74,000 174,000 100,000 74,000 174,000 Year 2 FY 10- 11 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 103,500 76,590 180,090 103,500 76,590 180,090 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 107,123 79,271 186,393 107,123 79,271 186,393 Year 4 FY 12-13 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 110,872 82,045 192,917 110,872 82,045 192,917 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ $ $ $ $ - 114,752 84,917 199,669 114,752 84,917 199,669 Total Project $ $ $ $ $ $ - 118,769 87,889 206,657 536,247 396,822 933,069 The first phase of project 442.11.31 is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2010. Components in Pinal County, protecting downstream property in Maricopa County, will be operated and maintained by the District. 63 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Project Name: Project Location: County District(s): County Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: Flood Control District Glendale/Peoria ADMP 450.02.32 – T4N/R1E 450.03.34 – T3N/R2E 450.05.30 – T3N/R1E, T3N/R2E 450.06.31 – T4N/R1E 450.08.31 – T4N/R1E 4 450.02.32 – City of Peoria 450.03.34 – City of Glendale 450.05.30 – City of Glendale 450.06.31 – Flood Control District 450.08.31 – City of Peoria 450.02.32 – City of Peoria 450.03.34 – City of Glendale (Pending/Unapproved) 450.05.30 – City of Glendale 450.06.31 – City of Peoria (Pending/Unapproved) 450.08.31 – City of Peoria (Pending/Unapproved) 450.02.32 – City of Peoria 450.03.34 – City of Glendale 450.05.30 – City of Glendale 450.06.31 – City of Peoria 450.08.31 – City of Peoria 450.02.32 – FY 2011 450.03.34 – FY 2011 450.05.30 – FY 2010 450.06.31 – FY 2014 450.08.31 – FY 2014 Project Description: 450.02.32 - Rose Garden Lane Channel 64 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Update Study (G/P ADMPU) in May 2001 which made several recommendations for regional drainage infrastructure to provide 100year protection for the watershed. The Rose Garden Lane Channel is a high priority recommendation of the G/P ADMPU and ranks as a high priority flood control project for the City of Peoria. The City Council of Peoria adopted the recommendations of the G/P ADMPU in May 2001, and the Board of Directors of the District adopted the G/P ADMPU recommendations in December 2001 (Resolution FCD 2001R012). This project involves construction of an open channel along the north side of Rose Garden Lane and a basin at the Agua Fria River outfall, and the project will provide a 100-year level of protection for an area between approximately Lake Pleasant Road and the Agua Fria River, south of Rose Garden Lane. The channel will accept flows that currently flow over Rose Garden Lane and overflow the Beardsley Channel and convey them to the Agua Fria River. Intergovernmental agreements between the District and the City of Peoria are in place for design and construction of the project, and the City is the lead agency for all tasks. Channel construction is complete. Basin construction is awaiting acquisition of rights-of-way from Arizona State Land Department, with contract award expected in Fiscal Year 2010. 450.03.34 – Northern Avenue Storm Drain (47th Avenue to 63rd Avenue) The District completed the Glendale/Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) in 1987. The District partnered with the City of Glendale, City of Peoria and other agencies to construct the Northern and Orangewood Storm Drain and Basin project in 2001 in accordance with the ADMP. The project included a basin at 63rd Avenue and Northern Avenue, and storm drains along Northern Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, with an ultimate outfall at the New River. The Northern Avenue Storm Drain Project, also a recommended component of the Glendale/Peoria ADMP, enhances the efficiency of the previously-constructed project, directing storm water to the basin at 63rd Avenue, while mitigating flooding hazards historically affecting the downstream developed area. The City of Glendale is unilaterally funding project design. The District anticipates entering a cost-share IGA to partially fund storm drain construction, which is anticipated to begin prior to Fiscal Year 2010. The City of Glendale will act as lead agency throughout the project and will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 450.05.30 - 67th Avenue Storm Drain The City of Glendale is the lead agency for this project, which will provide 10-year storm drainage protection for a three-square-mile area lying within jurisdictional boundaries of the cities of Glendale and Peoria. The project will consist of drainage pipes and catch basins, and will be constructed in rights-of-way provided by the City of Glendale. The outfalls for the project were constructed by the District along 67th Avenue and Cactus Road, and 67th Avenue and Olive Avenue, and are owned and operated by the City of Peoria. The first phase of the project is complete and involved the installation of 200 ft. of storm drain at the intersection of 67th and Peoria Avenue. The remaining storm drain design and construction along 67th Avenue from Cactus Road to the Arizona Canal Diversion Channel is expected to be substantially complete prior to Fiscal Year 2010. 65 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District The District is contributing 50 percent of the project costs, estimated at $3 million. The City of Glendale will own, operate and maintain the completed project. 66 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 450.06.31 - Pinnacle Peak Road Channel (89th Ave. to the Agua Fria River) The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed (ADMPU) to identify existing and future drainage and flooding develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Agua Fria River. the Glendale/Peoria ADMP Update problems in the watershed, and to ADMPU recommended a number of Peak Road from 87th Avenue to the The City of Peoria is accomplishing the 100-year conveyance drainage component from 87th Avenue to 99th Avenue through development stipulations. This project provides for drainage from 99th Avenue west to an ultimate outfall in the Agua Fria River. The project will also provide roadway improvements along this alignment. The District expects to enter an IGA with the City of Peoria and award a design contract prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Project construction is anticipated by Fiscal Year 2012. 450.08.31 – Pinnacle Peak Road / 67th Avenue Drainage Improvements The District and the Cities of Glendale and Peoria developed the Glendale/Peoria ADMP Update (ADMPU) to identify existing and future drainage and flooding problems in the watershed, and to develop cost-effective solutions to alleviate those problems. The ADMPU recommended a number of solutions to flooding problems including a project along Pinnacle Peak Road from the New River to 67th Avenue, north to Hatfield Road. The recommended project will capture and convey 100-year storm flows from areas north of Pinnacle Peak Road and east of 67th Avenue, and discharge those flows to the New River. It will provide protection to existing, proposed and future developments downstream of Pinnacle Peak Road. The District anticipates partnering with the City of Peoria. An IGA is required. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects 67 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 56,868,007 7,219,593 Project Total $ 64,087,600 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 7,825,000 2,450,000 $ 10,275,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 3,545,000 1,780,000 5,325,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 2,210,000 2,210,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 68 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 2,300,000 4,150,000 6,450,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 7,270,000 4,150,000 11,420,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 30,000 30,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 15,355,000 10,080,000 25,435,000 $ $ Total Project 80,048,007 19,749,593 99,797,600 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: White Tanks – Agua Fria ADMP 470.04.30 - T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W 470.04.32 - T1N/R2W, T2N/R2W 470.12.31 - T3N/R1W 470.13.31 - T1N/R1W 470.14.31 - Loop 303 Corridor 470.15.31 - T3N/R1W 470.16.31 - T1N/R1W 470.XX.X1 - T3N/R1W County District(s): Managing Department: 4, 5 470.04.30 - Flood Control District 470.04.32 - Flood Control District 470.12.31 - Flood Control District 470.13.31 - Flood Control District 470.14.31 - Flood Control District, ADOT 470.15.31 - MCDOT 470.16.31 - City of Avondale 470.XX.X1 - Flood Control District 470.04.30 - NRCS 470.04.32 - None 470.12.31 - MCDOT, City of Surprise, Peoria 180 LLC, Woolf Family Ent. 470.13.31 - City of Goodyear 470.14.31 - ADOT, City of Goodyear (Pending/Unapproved) 470.15.31 - MCDOT (Pending/Unapproved) 470.16.31 - City of Avondale 470.XX.X1 - City of Surprise, City of El Mirage (Pending/Unapproved) 470.04.30 - Flood Control District 470.04.32 - Flood Control District 470.12.31 - Flood Control District 470.13.31 - City of Goodyear 470.14.31 - ADOT, Flood Control District, City of Goodyear 470.15.31 - MCDOT 470.16.31 - City of Avondale Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: 69 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Completion Date: Flood Control District 470.XX.X1 - City of Surprise, City of El Mirage 470.04.30 - FY 2011 470.04.32 - Outside Five-Year CIP 470.12.31 - FY 2010 470.13.31 - Outside Five-Year CIP 470.14.31 - Outside Five-Year CIP 470.15.31 - FY 2013 470.16.31 - FY 2011 470.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 470.04.30 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Modifications White Tanks FRS No.3 is ranked first in the nation by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under their dam rehabilitation priority ranking process. The District and NRCS have proceeded with a rehabilitation project under the “Small Watershed Rehabilitation Amendment" (Public Law 106-472), which authorizes NRCS to assist watershed project sponsors with rehabilitation of aging dams on a 65 percent federal, 35 percent local cost share basis, and NRCS is additionally providing technical assistance for the project. The District and NRCS completed the final work plan and environmental assessment in 2004 and signed an IGA for the project early in Fiscal Year 2005. In Fiscal Year 2004, the District contracted an alternative evaluation and chose to modify the dam. The first phase of dam modification is complete. The first phase included plugging and abandoning existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP) outlets, construction of principal pipe outlets to replace the existing CMP outlets, and construction of a soil cement embankment section and cutoff walls in the dam's south fissure risk zone. The second phase of design is substantially complete and includes a new emergency spillway drop structure and non-fissure risk zone embankment segments. The second phase of construction is expected to begin prior to Fiscal Year 2010. 470.04.32 - White Tanks FRS No. 3 Outlet Channel In Fiscal Year 2006, the District examined a series of alternatives associated with the rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No.4. Project recommendations included an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4 (this project), rehabilitation of White Tanks FRS No. 4 (project 201.02.31) and an outlet channel from White Tanks FRS No. 4 to the Gila River (project 201.01.31). This project combines soft structural channel and a box culvert along a five-mile stretch of Jackrabbit Trail to convey storm water from behind White Tanks FRS No. 3 to White Tanks FRS No. 4; it provides additional protection from southeasterly flows for residents east of Jackrabbit Trail. From Camelback Road south to I-10, the project provides a 100-year level of protection. After completion of the White Tanks FRS No.4 Outlet Channel project, storm water conveyed by this project would subsequently be conveyed to the Gila River. The District anticipates completing the project unilaterally. A pre-design is in progress, and land acquisitions are anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010. 70 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Exclusive of future agreements, operations and maintenance of the completed project will be the District’s responsibility. 470.12.31 - Reems Road Channel This project includes a flood control channel along the west side of Reems Road from south of Waddell Road to the Dysart Drain at the Falcon Dunes Golf Course, and a 42-acre basin north of Olive Avenue, providing 100-year flood protection. The City of Surprise is constructing the channel from Peoria Avenue north to Waddell Road. The District is constructing the channel and basin south of Peoria Avenue, and also cost sharing with the City of Surprise on the box culvert to be constructed at Peoria Avenue. MCDOT has agreed to cost share to extend box culverts at Olive and Butler to their ultimate length. The District has also entered into cost-share agreements with two developers for extended box culverts on developer-owned property. Portions of the City of Surprise’s component of the project are in place. The District’s portion is expected to be substantially complete prior to Fiscal Year 2010. 470.13.31 - Bullard Wash Phase II Bullard Wash is included within the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP, which recommends wash improvements. Phase I of the project, from the Gila River to Lower Buckeye Road, was constructed as a District/City of Goodyear project. Phase II includes an earthen/greenbelt channel along the Bullard Wash alignment from Lower Buckeye Road to McDowell Road and a detention basin just south of McDowell Road. Landscaping and trails are anticipated along the channel alignment and within the basin. The project will channelize the floodplain north of the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport. It will reduce the floodplain width, and protect the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport and nearby development from flooding. This stormwater would otherwise collect in streets, farm fields, and residential and commercial areas. Design of Bullard Wash from Lower Buckeye Parkway to I-10 is complete, and IGAs with the City for construction of the project are in place. Construction timing is dependent upon the availability of District and City funding and will likely be phased, with some phases being completed outside the five-year CIP. 470.14.31 - Loop 303 Drainage Improvements The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMP consisted of an area drainage master plan to determine guidelines for stormwater management and structural mitigation measures for flooding in the White Tanks area. This included analysis of approximately 220 square miles of watershed, which extends from Grand Avenue south to the Gila River, and from the White Tank Mountains east to the Agua Fria River. The study identified drainage problems, updated the existing hydrology due to development and new hydrologic methodology, developed cost-effective solutions for a stormwater collection and conveyance system, and identified a preferred outfall alternative associated with SR-303L. The District will partner with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) in this regional project, and intends to construct drainage solutions from Van Buren Street to the Gila River, while ADOT will construct the project from Van Buren Street to approximately Bell Road. Construction of the District's portion of the project will likely precede construction of SR-303L. 71 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Additional partnering agreements with the City of Goodyear are anticipated. A pre-design will be completed prior to Fiscal Year 2010, basin rights-of-way have been acquired, and final design is anticipated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010 or 2011. 470.15.31 - Northern Parkway Drainage Improvements (Loop 303 to Reems) The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)/Glendale Northern Parkway project constructs a drainage channel along the north side of the parkway from SR-303L to Reems Road, subsequently connecting to the Dysart Basin at Falcon Dunes Golf Course. The project provides 100-year protection for local farms, future development and roadway traffic. The District intends to enter into a cost-share arrangement with MCDOT. Construction is expected late in the five-year CIP, in sequence with Northern Parkway construction. 470.16.31 - Elm Lane Drainage Mitigation The Elm Drainage Mitigation Project at Central Avenue and Elm Lane in Avondale involves the construction of approximately one-half mile of storm drains with catch basins, one or two retention basins and an outfall culvert. The project resulted from an alternatives mini-study conducted by the City of Avondale in response to flooding in streets and homes. The drainage improvements will provide protection from a 10-year storm event. The City of Avondale will act as the project's lead agency, and the District will share in 50- percent of the total project cost. Construction is anticipated to be completed by Fiscal Year 2011. 470.XX.X1 – Waddell Road Drainage Improvements The Waddell Road Drainage Improvements Project was originally proposed by the District’s 1994 White Tanks/Agua Fria Area Drainage Master Plan. The City of Surprise, under the Fiscal Year 2001 CIP Prioritization Procedure, requested the implementation of the project. The completed project will provide a 100-year level of flood protection for the Lower El Mirage Watershed in the vicinity of Dysart Road and Waddell Road. The District is completing a candidate assessment report that will further define the project’s recommended components. Project design and construction schedules will depend upon the availability of project partner funding and candidate assessment report recommendations. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. 72 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • • Dam Safety Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 78,980,255 17,156,826 Project Total $ 96,137,081 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 8,176,000 2,340,000 $ 10,516,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 14,005,000 3,535,000 17,540,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 5,847,000 1,500,000 7,347,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 73 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 20,392,000 2,500,000 22,892,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 14,432,000 200,000 14,632,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 9,180,000 2,500,000 11,680,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 63,856,000 10,235,000 74,091,000 $ $ Total Project 151,012,255 29,731,826 180,744,081 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Queen Creek/Sonoqui Wash ADMP 480.04.32 - T2S/R6E, T2S/R7E 480.04.34 - T2S/R7E County District(s): Managing Department: 1 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.04.32 480.04.34 480.04.32 480.04.34 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District Flood Control District Town of Queen Creek (Projected) None Town of Queen Creek Flood Control District FY 2014 Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 480.04.32 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Chandler Heights to Crismon) The Queen Creek / Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization, completed in Fiscal Year 2009, included a basin at approximately Chandler Heights Road and Sossaman Road, channelization northwest to Ocotillo Road and approximately Power Road, and channelization west along the Ocotillo Road alignment to an outfall at Queen Creek Wash at Higley Road. The second phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization includes the segment of the existing wash southeast from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road, and along Riggs Road to Crismon Road. The proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow to prevent flooding to property adjacent to the wash. The existing floodplain from Chandler Heights Road to Riggs Road will be contained within the proposed 200-foot-wide channel. The Riggs Road to Crismon Road portion of Sonoqui Wash collects overland flow from the south and conveys it into the main branch of Sonoqui Wash. This is a joint project between the District and the Town of Queen Creek. The District is acting as lead agency for design, which is in progress. Lead agency responsibilities for rights-of-way acquisition and construction may be split geographically and will be determined by a future IGA. 480.04.34 - Sonoqui Wash Channelization (Main Branch) The Queen Creek / Sonoqui Wash Hydraulic Master Plan recommended channelization of Sonoqui Wash. The first phase of channelization has been completed. The third phase of Sonoqui Wash Channelization will outfall to the second phase, which is being implemented by the District in partnership with the Town of Queen Creek. The third phase includes channelization of the main branch of Sonoqui Wash, from Empire Road at Ellsworth Road, northeast to Riggs Road at approximately Hawes Road. This section is located in unincorporated Maricopa County, and the District anticipates funding the project unilaterally. The 74 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District proposed channel will be designed to collect and convey the 100-year flow, remove 345 acres and 217 homes from the floodplain and provide protection to roads and other infrastructure. Design is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2012; however, project schedule will be dependent upon the progress of the second phase of channelization. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • • Flood Control Capital Projects Flood Infrastructure Multi-Purpose Enhancement Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 13,053,495 6,272,991 Project Total $ 19,326,486 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 658,000 328,000 $ 986,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 4,023,000 300,000 4,323,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 45,000 45,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 75 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 160,000 160,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 8,360,000 8,360,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 4,240,000 4,240,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 16,828,000 300,000 17,128,000 $ $ Total Project 30,539,495 6,900,991 37,440,486 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Higley Area Drainage Master Plan 491.04.31 - T2S/R5E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1 491.04.31 491.04.31 491.04.31 491.04.31 - City of Chandler City of Chandler City of Chandler FY 2010 Project Description: 491.04.31 - Queen Creek Road Basin The Queen Creek Road Basin was identified as one element of the recommended plan of the Higley ADMP. The off-line basin alleviates flooding problems along the eastern boundary of the Consolidated Canal as well as flooding to the west caused by possible overtopping of the canal from runoff generated within the study area. The completed basin will retain approximately 158 acre-feet of storage volume for up to a 100-year frequency storm event. The City of Chandler is the lead agency for project design and construction, and will own, operate and maintain the completed basin. The City plans to develop the basin site into a regional park. The District is participating in a cost-share IGA, with a contribution not to exceed $2.2 million. Construction is scheduled to be substantially completed prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 76 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 4,919,707 158,129 Project Total $ 5,077,836 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,977,000 $ 1,977,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 10,000 10,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 77 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 10,000 10,000 $ $ Total Project 6,906,707 158,129 7,064,836 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Durango ADMP 565.04.31 - T1N/R1E, T1N/R2E 565.04.32 - T1N/R1W, T1N/R1E 565.04.33 - T1N/R1E County District(s): Managing Department: 5 565.04.31 565.04.32 565.04.33 565.04.31 565.04.32 565.04.33 565.04.31 565.04.32 565.04.33 565.04.31 565.04.32 565.04.33 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: - Flood Control District, City of Phoenix Flood Control District, City of Avondale Flood Control District, City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Avondale (Projected) City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Avondale City of Phoenix FY 2011 Outside Five-Year CIP Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 565.04.31 - 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel The 75th Avenue Storm Drain and Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (DRCC) was recommended by the Durango ADMP and was requested by the City of Phoenix. The project will provide an interim regional outfall channel and is the first phase of the DRCC project. Project improvements will reduce flooding hazards north of the Union Pacific Railroad and remove approximately 71 structures from an identified floodplain. The City is the lead agency for design of both the storm drain and the DRCC, and is the lead agency for storm drain construction which began in Fiscal Year 2006. The District is the lead agency for construction of the first phase of the DRCC, which is in progress and is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2010. 565.04.32 - Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (107th Ave. to Agua Fria River) The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. 78 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 107th Avenue and the Agua Fria River, and between Lower Buckeye Road and Southern Avenue. The City of Avondale submitted the project for consideration under the Fiscal Year 2003 Prioritization Procedure, and the District anticipates participating in a cost-share agreement with the City. Project implementation is awaiting an IGA between the District and the City of Avondale. 565.04.33 - Durango Regional Conveyance Channel (75th Ave. to 107th Ave.) The District completed the Durango Area Drainage Master Plan to develop and evaluate solutions to mitigate flooding hazards in the Durango drainage area. The study recommended a regional channel and basin in the vicinity of the Salt River Project Buckeye Feeder Canal to intercept storm water flows and provide an outfall to the Agua Fria River. The project would reduce flooding hazards and provide a 100-year outfall in the Durango drainage area. This project constructs the portion of the recommended plan located between 75th Avenue and 107th Avenue, one-half mile north of the Broadway Road alignment. The channel was partially constructed as a series of linear retention basins by developers through efforts coordinated by the City of Phoenix. Construction of a basin (or basins) along the channel alignment is required prior to the construction of box culverts that will connect the linear basins and allow for an outfall to the phase to be constructed west of 107th Avenue. The District intends anticipates entering an IGA with the City of Phoenix for advance rights-of-way acquisition, and acquiring a project basin site prior to Fiscal Year 2010. Further project implementation will continue once the District has entered additional IGAs with the City. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 12,055,661 2,553,627 Project Total $ 14,609,288 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA $ Projected FY 08-09 6,625,000 1,642,000 $ 8,267,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 1,720,000 804,000 2,524,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 2,580,000 250,000 2,830,000 79 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 480,000 480,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 3,260,000 3,260,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 5,860,000 5,860,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 13,900,000 1,054,000 14,954,000 $ $ Total Project 32,580,661 5,249,627 37,830,288 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 80 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Scatter Wash 590.03.31 - T4N/R2E Supervisor District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3, 4 590.03.31 590.03.31 590.03.31 590.03.31 - ADOT ADOT ADOT FY 2010 Project Description: 590.03.31 - Scatter Wash Basin Improvements The Scatter Wash Basin Improvement project originated from an Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) proposal and consists of improvements to Scatter Wash at the Interstate-17 crossings, culvert improvements, and construction of an off-line basin. The completed improvements will provide a 100year level of protection. The District entered into an IGA with ADOT and the City of Phoenix to fund 28 percent of the total project costs, not to exceed $1,008,000. ADOT is the lead agency for design, right-of-way acquisition and construction, and the City and ADOT will share operation and maintenance responsibilities. Project design and right-of-way acquisition are complete, and construction is underway. The District has completed its cost-share commitment to the project. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 2,526,886 Project Total $ 2,526,886 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax $ Projected FY 08-09 5,000 $ 5,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 5,000 5,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ 81 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 - $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 - $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 5,000 5,000 $ $ Total Project 2,536,886 2,536,886 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 82 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Maryvale ADMP 620.03.32 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E 620.03.33 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E 620.03.34 - T2N/R1E, T2N/R2E County District(s): Managing Department: 4, 5 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 620.03.32 620.03.33 620.03.34 Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: – Flood Control District – Flood Control District – City of Glendale - City of Phoenix, City of - City of Phoenix, City of - City of Glendale - City of Phoenix, City of - City of Phoenix, City of - City of Glendale - FY 2010 - FY 2013 - FY 2013 Glendale Glendale Glendale Glendale Project Description: 620.03.32 - Bethany Home Outfall Channel The Bethany Home Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The project will have a 100-year capacity removing approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the project, extending west from the Agua Fria Freeway (Loop 101) to the New River along the Bethany Home Road alignment, has been completed by ADOT with District participation. ADOT increased the size of their channel to accommodate additional flows from the east. Phase II of the project includes a channel from the Agua Fria Freeway alignment to 63rd Avenue. The ADMP also recommends 10-year capacity storm drains, located within Bethany Home Road and Camelback Road, extending from 59th Avenue to the Outfall Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the cost to construct this 100-year channel and 10-year storm drains is approximately $67 million. The cost share for the project is approximately fifty percent District, and 25 percent each for the cities of Glendale and Phoenix. Construction of portions of the project from Loop 101 to 67th Avenue is completed. Completion of construction of the final phase of the primary outfall channel is anticipated in Fiscal Year 2010. 620.03.33 – Camelback Rd. Storm Drain (59th Ave. to 75th Ave.) The Bethany Home Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The project will have a 100-year capacity removing approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is 83 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the project, extending west from the Agua Fria Freeway (Loop 101) to the New River along the Bethany Home Road alignment, has been completed by ADOT with District participation. ADOT increased the size of their channel to accommodate additional flows from the east. Phase II of the project includes a channel from the Agua Fria Freeway alignment to 63rd Avenue as well as 10-year capacity storm drains, located within Bethany Home Road and Camelback Road, extending from 59th Avenue to the Outfall Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the cost to construct this 100-year channel and 10-year storm drains is approximately $67 million. The cost share for the project is approximately fifty percent District, and 25 percent each for the cities of Glendale and Phoenix. Construction of portions of the project from Loop 101 to 67th Avenue is completed. Completion of construction of the final phase of the primary outfall channel is anticipated in fiscal year 2010. Design of the storm drain in Camelback Rd., which outfalls to the channel, is in progress. Storm drain construction timing will be dependent upon the availability of project partner funding. 620.03.34 – Bethany Home Rd. Storm Drain (79th Ave. to 59th Ave.) The Bethany Home Outfall Channel project includes a linear basin and channel along the Grand Canal extending westerly from 63rd Avenue to the New River. The project will have a 100-year capacity removing approximately 745 structures from the floodplain. The channel alignment (Phase I and II) is in Phoenix, Glendale, and unincorporated Maricopa County. Portions of the channel are being used as a trail corridor and linear park. Phase I of the project, extending west from the Agua Fria Freeway (Loop 101) to the New River along the Bethany Home Road alignment, has been completed by ADOT with District participation. ADOT increased the size of their channel to accommodate additional flows from the east. Phase II of the project includes a channel from the Agua Fria Freeway alignment to 63rd Avenue, as well as 10-year capacity storm drains, located within Bethany Home Road and Camelback Road, extending from 59th Avenue to the Outfall Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the cost to construct this 100-year channel and 10-year storm drains is approximately $67 million. The cost share for the project is approximately fifty percent District, and 25 percent each for the cities of Glendale and Phoenix. Construction of portions of the project from Loop 101 to 67th Avenue is completed. Completion of construction of the final phase of the primary outfall channel is anticipated in fiscal year 2010. Design and construction of the storm drain in Bethany Home Rd., which outfalls to the channel will be accomplished by the City of Glendale and is anticipated to be phased. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. 84 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals 40,718,814 34,231,460 Project Total $ 74,950,274 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Partnership Contributions/IGA/IDA $ Projected FY 08-09 389,000 1,416,000 $ 1,805,000 $ $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 112,000 2,406,000 2,518,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 1,880,000 1,880,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 85 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 7,110,000 3,890,000 11,000,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 80,000 80,000 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ - $ $ 5-Year Total 9,182,000 6,296,000 15,478,000 $ $ Total Project 50,289,814 41,943,460 92,233,274 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Metro ADMP 625.01.30 - T1N/R3E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 3 625.01.30 625.01.30 625.01.30 625.01.30 - City of Phoenix City of Phoenix City of Phoenix Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 625.01.30 – Downtown Phoenix Drainage System (Phase I) The Fiscal Year 2008 Prioritization Procedure recommended this project as a component of the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project that was concurrently being studied under the Metro ADMP. The Metro ADMP subsequently recommended the Downtown Phoenix Drainage Improvements Project as a subset of its recommended downtown alternative. The project’s conceptual design involves the installation of drainage features along 1st Avenue, from Van Buren Street to Hadley Street; along Jefferson Street from 19th Avenue to 3rd Avenue; and in the vicinity of Fillmore Street and 3rd Avenue. Specific alignments will be determined during the final design process. When combined with the complete downtown system recommended by the ADMP, this project will deliver a 10-year level of protection for the downtown area. Design of the Jefferson Street and Fillmore Street components is in progress, with construction anticipated in Fiscal Years 2010 through 2012. Design and construction of the 1st Avenue component will likely require the approval of additional funding in a future City bond election. Phoenix is acting as lead agency for project design and construction, and the District intends to contribute 50 percent of the project cost. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 86 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Previous Actuals $ 3,973,533 Project Total $ 3,973,533 Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Projected FY 08-09 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 2,297,000 2,297,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 2,780,000 2,780,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 87 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 780,000 780,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 20,000 20,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 10,000 10,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 5,887,000 5,887,000 $ $ Total Project 9,884,533 9,884,533 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Small Projects Assistance Program 699.XX.X1 - N/A County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Various Various Various 699.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP Project Description: 699.XX.X1 – Small Projects Assistance Program By the direction of the Board, since 1995, District capital projects have been evaluated under the District’s Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure. The evaluation criteria of the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Procedure promote the prioritization of capital projects that are regional in nature; however, localized flood hazards exist throughout Maricopa County, and the mitigation of these localized flood hazards, on a limited basis, is consistent with the District’s statutory obligation. The District has developed a Small Project Assistance Program, intended to provide financial assistance to the municipalities of Maricopa County, on a trial basis, in implementing local flood hazard mitigation capital projects. The highly-structured draft program authorizes a collective maximum of $2,000,000 per fiscal year in funding for small projects targeting mitigation of historic flooding hazards, with a $250,000 per-project District cost share cap. Review of this program by the Board is anticipated during before August, 2009. Pending approval, projects may begin to receive District funding in Fiscal Year 2011. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects 88 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ Projected FY 08-09 - $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 - $ $ - $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 2,000,000 2,000,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 89 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 2,000,000 2,000,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 8,000,000 8,000,000 $ $ Total Project 8,000,000 8,000,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Floodprone Property Assistance Program 700.XX.X1 - N/A 700.09.30 - T4N/R2E 700.09.31 - T7N/R5W 700.09.32 - T5N/R3W 700.09.34 - T4N/R2E 700.09.35 - T7N/R2E 700.09.36 - T4N/R2E County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Flood Control District None Flood Control District 700.XX.X1 - Outside Five-Year CIP 700.09.30 - FY 2010 700.09.31 - FY 2010 700.09.32 - FY 2010 700.09.34 - FY 2010 700.09.35 - FY 2010 700.09.36 - FY 2010 Project Description: 700.XX.X1 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Unallocated Less than 18 percent of the estimated 9,800 miles of stream corridor in Maricopa County have been mapped with regulatory floodplains and floodways. In many of the mapped areas, development took place prior to the floodplain mapping, and as floodplains were delineated, residents learned their homes were within regulatory floodplains. The Floodprone Property Assistance Program (FPAP) involves the voluntary purchase of properties in flood hazard areas where structural flood control solutions are infeasible or impractical. Program applicants are scored and ranked under objective criteria. Existing structures on purchased properties are demolished and removed; property may be preserved as open space, sold, or leased for uses compatible with adjacent properties and floodplain regulations. 700.09.30 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Ladd (APN 209-04-070D) This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. 700.09.31 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Welna (APN 505-14019A) 90 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. 700.09.32 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Sturtevant (APN 503-32114) This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. 700.09.34 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Light (APN 209-04-070F) This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. 700.09.35 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: Miller (APN 202-11-020E) This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. 700.09.36 – Floodprone Property Assistance Program: 070G) Collier (APN 209-04- This property, evaluated in the Fiscal Year 2009 FPAP process, scored highly and was recommended for buyout. The District anticipates purchasing the property prior to Fiscal Year 2010, and completing demolition, environmental surveys and owner relocation in Fiscal Year 2010. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: Flood Control Capital Projects 91 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,052,000 $ 1,052,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 1,565,000 1,565,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 1,560,000 1,560,000 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 1,560,000 1,560,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 1,560,000 1,560,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 1,560,000 1,560,000 $ 5-Year Total 7,805,000 7,805,000 Year 4 FY 12-13 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ Total Project 8,857,000 8,857,000 $ $ Operating Cost Summary: Current Year Current User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Post Construction User Department Operating Costs Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Net User Department Operating Costs (post less current) Personal Sevices Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ Year 2 FY 10- 11 - $ 6,000 3,000 9,000 $ 6,000 3,000 9,000 $ $ $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 - $ 6,210 3,105 9,315 $ 6,210 3,105 9,315 $ $ $ $ - $ 6,427 3,214 9,641 $ 6,427 3,214 9,641 $ $ $ $ - $ 6,652 3,326 9,978 $ 6,885 3,443 $ 10,328 $ 6,652 3,326 9,978 $ $ $ - Total Project 6,885 3,443 $ 10,328 $ $ $ $ - 7,126 3,563 10,689 32,175 16,087 48,262 Projects 700.09.30, 700.09.31, 700.09.32, 700.09.34 and 700.09.36 acquired floodprone properties, which will be demolished. The vacant land will be maintained by the District, or sold at some future date if appropriate. The floodprone property associated with project 700.09.35 may be acquired prior to Fiscal Year 2010 – the District has extended an offer and is awaiting a response from the property owner; if this occurs, additional operating costs will be incurred following the demolition of the associated structures. 92 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District Project Name: Project Location: Flood Control Project Reserve NA County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): O&M Responsibility: Completion Date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 NA NA NA NA Project Description: Flood Control Project Reserve The District’s budgeted project reserve provides supplemental funding for unanticipated cost increases and increases project scheduling flexibility, allowing the District to accelerate flood control projects when it is appropriate or advantageous to do so. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Flood Hazard Remediation Program is to provide structural and non-structural flood hazard protection services to the public so they can live with minimal risk of loss of life or property damage due to flooding. Strategic Goals Addressed: By 2013, Maricopa County Public Works will provide to the residents and visitors of Maricopa County required public works infrastructure by delivering 90% of Public Works Capital projects identified in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program. Strategic Plan Programs Supported: • Flood Hazard Remediation Strategic Plan Activities Supported: • Flood Control Capital Projects Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Flood Control District Property Tax Previous Actuals $ Project Total $ - Projected FY 08-09 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ $ Year 1 FY 09-10 2,860,000 2,860,000 $ $ Year 2 FY 10-11 3,498,000 3,498,000 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable. 93 $ $ Year 3 FY 11-12 2,338,000 2,338,000 $ $ Year 4 FY 12-13 3,438,000 3,438,000 $ $ Year 5 FY 13-14 1,670,000 1,670,000 $ $ 5-Year Total 13,804,000 13,804,000 $ $ Total Project 15,254,000 15,254,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Flood Control District 94 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Motion Final Budget Adoption (Approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 22, 2009) Convene a public hearing, pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-17104 and 42-17105, to consider and adopt the following: Approve the Fiscal Year 2009-10 Library District Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for Library District in the amount of $31,524,526. 95 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District 96 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Library District adopted revenue budget for FY 2009-10 is $24,224,743 and expenditure budget for 2009-10 is $31,524,526. The tax rate will remain the same from FY 2008-09 to FY 2009-10. The rate will be $0.0353 per $100 of assessed value. In FY 2008-09, the District opened the new Queen Creek branch, assumed control of the Sun City Branch, and began work on plans for a White Tank Branch Library which will also include a Parks and Recreation Department Nature Center. In FY 2009-10, the District expects to complete negotiations to include the Mesa Public Library and the Ak Chin Indian Community Library to the District’s Polaris Integrated Library Automated System. Property Tax Revenue by Fiscal Year $22,000,000 $21,000,000 $20,375,371 $20,263,686 FY09 Projected FY10 Adopted $20,000,000 Property Tax Revenue $19,132,380 $19,000,000 $18,059,040 $18,000,000 $16,976,551 $17,000,000 $16,000,000 Use of the District library facilities continues to grow as the use of materials increased by more than 29% over the previous year. This is the sixth year in a row that use has increased by double digits. The Summer Reading program in FY 2008-09 reached 45,000 children and teens, an increase of more than 60% over the previous fiscal year. In FY 2009-10, the District expects to reach 60,000 children and teens $15,000,000 $14,000,000 FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 08 Actual Fiscal Year I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 97 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District 98 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Analysis by Julia Smith, Management & Budget Analyst Mission The Mission of the Maricopa County Library District is to provide access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Vision Maricopa County Library District’s vision is to exceed customer expectations by giving our best and transforming ourselves daily through innovation and relationship building. • Annually, by June 30 of each year, achieve and maintain customer satisfaction with the library’s collection of books and other materials at 90%. Status: Customer satisfaction with the library's collection of books and other materials was 88.3 percent, per in house Customer Satisfaction survey in FY 2008-09. • By June 30, 2008, increase resource usage to meet or exceed the average increase of 10 benchmark libraries. Status: This goal has been achieved. Circulation growth of 30% from 2005-2009 exceeded all other benchmark libraries which ranged from -13% to 22%. • By June 30, 2009, increase the number of active (card is used at least 3 times in 12 months) cardholders by 40% over the 89,593 cardholders on June 30, 2004. Status: Services and programs are being improved to encourage active use of the Libraries. The Library District is developing a tracking measure to count people who use public internet terminals as usage. • Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Status: In FY 2008-09, 2,948 youth programs were presented, serving 109,597 youths. In addition, over 63,000 kids and teens registered for the 2009 Summer Reading Program. Completion Rates were 41% and 51%, respectively. A $75,000 grant from Target Corporation allowed a more extensive marketing plan than in prior years contributing to this success. The Library District also worked with Cox Communications to advertise on television and with Arizona Parenting in their print publication to promote Summer Reading. 99 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Budget Summary Consolidated Budget by Fund Type FUND TYPE: SPECIAL REVENUE BEG. UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING PROPERTY TAXES $ PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES FINES & FORFEITS INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ NON-RECURRING TRANSFERS IN TOTAL NON-RECURRING SOURCES $ $ TOTAL SOURCES $ CAPITAL PROJECTS 8,335,738 $ 20,263,686 $ 226,942 2,828,938 26,000 654,696 89,065 135,416 659,469 24,884,212 $ - $ - $ 24,884,212 $ SUBTOTAL 7,439,860 $ - $ - $ 15,775,598 ELIMINATIONS $ 20,263,686 $ 226,942 2,828,938 26,000 654,696 89,065 135,416 659,469 24,884,212 $ - TOTAL $ 15,775,598 - $ (659,469) (659,469) $ 20,263,686 226,942 2,828,938 26,000 654,696 89,065 135,416 24,224,743 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ $ (3,591,685) $ (3,591,685) $ - 3,591,685 $ 28,475,897 $ (4,251,154) $ 24,224,743 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 11,292,240 $ 5,001,522 5,559,738 71,026 659,469 22,583,995 $ - $ - $ 11,292,240 $ 5,001,522 5,559,738 71,026 659,469 22,583,995 $ - $ (659,469) (659,469) $ 11,292,240 5,001,522 5,559,738 71,026 21,924,526 NON-RECURRING CAPITAL $ OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ - $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 3,591,685 13,191,685 $ - $ (3,591,685) (3,591,685) $ 9,600,000 9,600,000 9,600,000 $ 35,775,680 $ (4,251,154) $ 31,524,526 - $ 2,300,217 $ - $ 2,300,217 8,475,815 $ - $ 8,475,815 TOTAL USES $ 26,175,680 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 2,300,217 $ ENDING UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ 7,044,270 $ 100 1,431,545 $ Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds $24,224,743 Permits, Fees & Fines 3% Miscellaneous & Interest 1% Other Intergovernmental & Grants 13% Property Taxes, Penalties & Interest 83% Uses of Funds $31,524,526 Administrative Services, 8% Information Technology, 6% Public Library Service, 86% 101 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED SOURCES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH $ 4,710,824 4,710,824 $ 5,065,964 $ 5,065,964 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES $ 772,350 13,171 759,179 $ 17,483 $ 600 16,883 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 19,344,696 19,344,696 $ 20,558,488 $ 20,558,488 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP $ - $ 35,195 $ 35,195 TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 24,827,870 $ 5,151,268 $ 5,151,268 17,483 600 16,883 2,772,068 $ 2,772,068 $ (5,748) $ (5,770) 22 20,558,488 $ 20,558,488 20,667,326 $ 20,667,326 35,195 35,195 3,607,050 $ 3,607,050 (1,544,218) (1,544,218) -30.0% -30.0% $ 71,582 (600) 72,182 409.4% -100.0% 427.5% 20,490,628 $ 20,490,628 (67,860) (67,860) -0.3% -0.3% 38,000 38,000 2,805 2,805 8.0% 8.0% 89,065 89,065 $ - $ - $ 25,677,130 $ 25,762,434 $ 23,433,646 $ 24,224,743 $ (1,537,691) -6.0% USES 65PL - PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MAPC - MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH $ 16,695,683 16,695,683 $ 22,114,864 $ 22,114,864 22,200,168 $ 22,200,168 17,408,816 $ 17,408,816 27,125,363 $ 27,125,363 (4,925,195) (4,925,195) -22.2% -22.2% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES RMGT - RISK MANAGEMENT $ 1,951,456 122,411 1,355,006 199,247 274,792 - $ 1,645,794 $ 116,763 923,381 294,896 272,303 38,451 1,645,794 $ 116,763 923,381 294,896 272,303 38,451 1,649,895 $ 121,228 1,037,852 245,986 232,010 12,819 1,768,121 $ 125,464 855,139 476,696 275,168 35,654 (122,327) (8,701) 68,242 (181,800) (2,865) 2,797 -7.4% -7.5% 7.4% -61.6% -1.1% 7.3% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES $ 850,867 778,880 71,987 $ 818,357 $ 818,357 - 818,357 $ 818,357 - 847,453 $ 818,357 29,096 857,945 $ 857,945 - (39,588) (39,588) - -4.8% -4.8% 99IT - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUAS - BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DACR - DATA CENTER DESK - DESKTOP SUPPORT VANS - INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS $ 1,485,122 550,993 169,833 348,766 415,530 $ 1,098,112 $ 371,867 240,467 229,145 256,633 1,098,112 $ 371,867 240,467 229,145 256,633 1,408,933 $ 453,148 188,189 385,817 381,779 1,773,097 $ 400,710 757,153 346,492 268,742 (674,985) (28,843) (516,686) (117,347) (12,109) -61.5% -7.8% -214.9% -51.2% -4.7% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 20,983,128 $ 25,677,127 $ 25,762,431 $ 21,315,097 $ 31,524,526 $ (5,762,095) -22.4% Sources and Uses by Category FY 2007-08 ACTUAL TAXES 0601 - PROPERTY TAXES FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ SUBTOTAL $ 19,132,381 19,132,381 $ $ 20,375,371 20,375,371 $ $ 20,375,371 20,375,371 $ $ 20,154,006 20,154,006 $ $ 20,263,686 20,263,686 $ $ INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0615 - GRANTS $ 0621 - PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES SUBTOTAL $ 66,969 224,837 291,806 $ $ $ 226,942 226,942 $ $ 75,000 189,419 264,419 $ $ 75,000 183,117 258,117 $ $ 183,117 183,117 $ (75,000) -100.0% 43,825 23.9% (31,175) -12.1% CHARGES FOR SERVICE 0634 - INTERGOV CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 0635 - OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ SUBTOTAL $ 3,654,309 2,899 3,657,208 $ $ $ 4,023,156 24,210 4,047,366 $ $ $ 4,023,156 24,210 4,047,366 $ $ $ 1,856,600 1,856,600 $ $ $ 2,828,938 26,000 2,854,938 $ $ $ (1,194,218) -29.7% 1,790 7.4% (1,192,428) -29.5% $ SUBTOTAL $ 669,001 669,001 $ $ 609,020 609,020 $ $ 609,020 609,020 $ $ 684,170 684,170 $ $ 654,696 654,696 $ $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ 759,179 318,295 1,077,474 $ $ $ 89,065 135,416 224,481 $ $ 323,923 150,528 474,451 $ $ 216,883 255,677 472,560 $ $ 216,883 245,373 462,256 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,827,870 $ 25,677,130 $ 25,762,434 $ 23,433,646 $ 24,224,743 $ FINES & FOREFEITS 0637 - FINES & FORFEITS 102 (111,685) (111,685) 45,676 45,676 -0.5% -0.5% 7.5% 7.5% (127,818) -58.9% (120,261) -47.0% (248,079) -52.5% (1,537,691) -6.0% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Category (con’t) FY 2007-08 ACTUAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 7,015,568 1,735 2,338,797 26,209 1,500 10,333,305 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 5,268,343 14,622 5,614,458 SERVICES 0812 - OTHER SERVICES $ 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING SUBTOTAL $ 320,962 371,116 462,453 94,808 35,201 229,406 4,468,292 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ TOTAL USES $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0803 - FUEL CAPITAL 0950 - DEBT SERVICE $ $ FY 2008-09 REVISED 6,769,613 $ 2,416,633 54,638 (193,653) 193,653 10,730,943 $ 5,658,040 16,000 5,784,040 $ $ $ 561,927 386,918 598,750 80,100 170,345 240,770 5,669,717 434,283 567,073 $ $ 20,983,128 $ $ FY 2008-09 FORECAST 6,769,613 $ 2,416,633 54,638 (193,653) 193,653 10,730,943 $ 5,743,344 16,000 5,869,344 $ $ $ 561,927 386,918 598,750 80,100 170,345 240,770 5,669,717 250,835 3,492,427 $ $ 25,677,127 $ $ 103 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 7,157,390 $ 358 2,461,319 53,226 (80,689) 80,689 10,766,369 $ 5,138,530 14,900 5,222,755 $ $ $ 373,457 373,097 616,971 66,037 98,265 218,027 4,979,972 250,835 3,492,427 $ $ 25,762,431 $ $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 7,498,996 $ 2,624,669 32,420 (185,288) 185,290 11,292,240 $ (729,383) (208,036) 22,218 (8,365) 8,363 (561,297) -10.8% 759,822 (2,000) 867,822 13.2% -12.5% 14.8% 158,805 (9,270) (169,639) 8,875 65,200 9,970 109,979 28.3% -2.4% -28.3% 11.1% 38.3% 4.1% 1.9% -8.6% 40.7% 4.3% 4.3% -5.2% 4,983,522 18,000 5,001,522 $ $ $ 403,122 396,188 768,389 71,225 105,145 230,800 5,559,738 293,046 346,001 $ $ 71,026 9,671,026 $ $ 179,809 71.7% (6,178,599) -176.9% 21,315,097 $ 31,524,526 $ (5,762,095) $ $ $ -22.4% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2007-08 ACTUAL 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ 66,969 66,969 FUND TOTAL SOURCES $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING $ FUND TOTAL SOURCES 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING FUND TOTAL SOURCES 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL SOURCES 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL SOURCES FY 2008-09 ADOPTED $ 24,760,901 24,760,901 $ $ $ $ $ $ FY 2008-09 REVISED - $ $ $ 21,915,639 21,915,639 - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ 75,000 75,000 FY 2008-09 FORECAST $ $ 3,396,844 $ 3,396,844 $ 3,750,165 $ 3,750,165 $ 944,764 944,764 20.1% 20.1% 7,708,315 7,708,315 $ 7,708,315 7,708,315 $ $ 37,425 $ 7,408,315 7,445,740 $ - $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ 4,116,630 4,116,630 53.4% 53.4% (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (573,969) (3,816,630) (4,390,599) 46.5% 51.5% 50.8% 23,433,646 $ $ 25,377,130 $ 25,377,130 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ - $ 300,000 $ 385,304 $ DEPARTMENT TOTAL SOURCES $ 24,827,870 $ 25,677,130 $ 25,762,434 $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED $ $ FY 2008-09 REVISED - $ $ 1,152,387 4.5% - $ 385,304 100.0% 23,433,646 $ 24,224,743 $ 1,537,691 6.0% FY 2008-09 FORECAST $ $ $ ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED - $ $ - $ - $ 75,000 75,000 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 20,916,159 20,916,159 $ 19,078,544 7,408,315 26,486,859 $ 19,078,544 7,418,619 26,497,163 $ 18,577,170 $ 7,408,315 25,985,485 $ 19,132,030 $ 3,591,685 22,723,715 $ (53,486) 3,826,934 3,773,448 -0.3% 51.6% 14.2% $ $ - $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ 3,965,485 $ 3,965,485 $ 3,451,965 $ 3,451,965 $ 1,242,964 1,242,964 26.5% 26.5% $ $ - $ $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 $ $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 $ $ 5,880 $ 5,880 $ $ $ $ - $ (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL USES $ 20,983,128 $ 22,540,035 $ 22,540,035 DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL USES $ - $ 3,137,092 $ 3,222,396 DEPARTMENT TOTAL USES $ 20,983,128 $ 25,677,127 $ 25,762,431 FUND TOTAL USES 465 LIBRARY DIST CAP IMPROVEMENT NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL USES $ 75,000 75,000 24,224,743 $ $ - FUND TOTAL USES $ 246 LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATING $ 3.6% 100.0% 3.6% $ $ $ $ 781,592 10,304 791,896 4,694,929 4,694,929 24,827,870 FUND TOTAL USES $ 21,134,047 $ 21,134,047 $ $ $ $ 244 LIBRARY DISTRICT OPERATING NON-RECURRING 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4,694,929 4,694,929 DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL SOURCES $ 66,969 66,969 75,000 75,000 $ (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $ FY 2007-08 ACTUAL $ 21,157,815 $ 21,157,815 $ - 242 LIBRARY DISTRICT GRANTS OPERATING NON-RECURRING 75,000 75,000 ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 21,915,639 10,304 21,925,943 $ $ FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 9,600,000 9,600,000 $ $ (6,462,908) (6,462,908) -206.0% -206.0% (1,233,438) $ (7,408,315) (8,641,753) $ (659,469) $ (3,591,685) (4,251,154) $ (573,969) (3,816,630) (4,390,599) 46.5% 51.5% 50.8% $ 21,309,217 $ 21,924,526 $ $ 5,880 $ 9,600,000 $ (6,377,604) -197.9% $ 21,315,097 $ 31,524,526 $ (5,762,095) -22.4% 615,509 2.7% Staffing by Program and Activity FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 650 - LIBRARY DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS APPLICATION DEV SUPP DATA CENTER DESKTOP SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK SVCS PROGRAM TOTAL PUBLIC LIBRARY SERVICE MATERIALS PROGS AND OUTREACH PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 1.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 16.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 16.00 1.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 17.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 3.00 15.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 14.00 140.96 140.96 170.96 140.96 140.96 170.96 142.96 142.96 173.96 138.96 138.96 167.96 104 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (2.00) (3.00) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (25.00%) (6.25%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (1.42%) (1.42%) (1.76%) FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % (1.00) (1.00) (2.00) (4.00) (4.00) (6.00) 0.00% (14.29%) 0.00% (25.00%) (11.76%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (2.80%) (2.80%) (3.45%) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Staffing by Market Range Title FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 650 - LIBRARY DISTRICT Executive Assistant Accounting Specialist Human Resources Specialist Office Assistant Library Page Library Clerk Library Paraprofessional Admin/Operations Specialist Deputy Director Director - Library Financial Supervisor - Dept Library Supervisor Human Resources Supervisor Library Support Services Supv Systems Admin & Analysis Supv Financial Support Supv - Dept Library Manager IT Senior Manager Management Analyst Accountant Planner Librarian Human Resources Analyst Database Administrator Network Engineer Network Engineer - Sr/Ld Systems/Network Admin-Sr/Ld Web Designer/Developer Web Designer/Developer-Sr/Ld PC/LAN Tech Support Media Specialist Communicatn Ofcr/Govt Liaison Planner - Facilities DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.24 42.72 26.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 35.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 170.96 FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.24 42.72 26.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 35.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 170.96 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.24 42.72 27.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 19.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 173.96 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.24 42.72 27.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 30.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 167.96 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % (1.00) 1.00 (1.00) 1.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00) (5.00) (1.00) 1.00 1.00 (3.00) 0.00% -33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -0.01% 3.85% -100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.11% 0.00% 0.00% -50.00% 0.00% -14.29% 0.00% 0.00% -50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% -1.76% FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % .00 (1.00) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (1.00) .00 .00 .00 (1.00) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 (3.00) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2.00) (6.00) 0.00% -33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -5.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -9.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -100.00% -3.45% Staffing by Fund FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 650 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 244 - LIBRARY DISTRICT 246 - LIBRARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 129.97 40.99 170.96 FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST 129.97 40.99 170.96 134.97 38.99 173.96 105 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 130.97 36.99 167.96 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 1.00 (4.00) (3.00) 0.77% -9.76% -1.76% FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % (4.00) (2.00) (6.00) -2.96% -5.13% -3.45% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Property Taxes The Library District collects property taxes on the secondary net assessed values of real and personal property. Unlike the County primary property tax, there is no constitutional limitation on growth in secondary property taxes. However, the Library District Board of Directors has chosen to impose growth limitations similar to those imposed on the primary levy in order to minimize the burden on taxpayers. As a result, beginning in FY 2006-07 the secondary levy associated with the Library District was capped at 2% annual growth on property taxed in the prior year, resulting in a reduction in the tax rate. The schedule below lists the secondary net assessed values, tax rates, and secondary property tax levies for the last thirteen fiscal years, plus the assessed values and tax rates for FY 2009-10. The Library District’s property tax rate remains unchanged at $0.0353 per $100 net assessed value. Fiscal Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Library District Preliminary Tax Levy Net Assessed Tax Rate Value (per $100 (Thousands) N.A.V.) Tax Levy $ 14,343,156 $ 0.0421 $ 6,038,469 15,723,498 0.0421 6,619,593 16,813,017 0.0421 7,078,280 18,676,830 0.0421 7,862,946 20,877,716 0.0421 8,586,315 22,913,134 0.0421 9,646,430 24,457,047 0.0421 10,182,607 27,477,988 0.0521 14,162,234 30,066,987 0.0521 15,534,579 33,197,218 0.0521 17,295,751 36,294,693 0.0507 18,401,410 49,534,573 0.0391 19,368,018 58,303,635 0.0353 20,581,183 57,984,051 0.0353 20,468,370 The Board of Directors must adopt the Library District’s property tax levy on or before the third Monday in August for the fiscal year that begins on the previous July 1. Real property taxes are paid in arrears in two installments, due November 1 and May 1. 106 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District 70 $0.0600 60 $0.0500 50 $0.0400 40 $0.0300 30 $0.0200 20 Tax Rate NAV ($ Billions) Net Assessed Value Vs. Tax Rate $0.0100 10 0 $99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Fiscal Year The FY 2009-10 budget includes an estimated secondary property tax levy (excluding Salt River Project) of $20,468,370, a decrease of $112,813 from the FY 2008-09 adopted levy. As indicated in the table below, secondary property tax revenue growth was tempered in the past two fiscal years and is projected to continue in future fiscal years as the result of the Board of Director’s commitment to reduce property tax rates by establishing self-imposed limits on the District’s property tax levy. FY 2009-10 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Description Net Assessed Value LIBRARY DISTRICT: FY 2009-10 Adopted FY 2008-09 Adopted FY 2007-08 Adopted $ $ $ 57,984,051,718 58,303,635,287 49,534,573,831 Salt River Proj. Effective Net Assessed Value $ $ $ 642,894,514 569,949,948 518,745,464 Total Net Assessed Value w/SRP Revenue from 1-cent Levy Tax Rates Property Tax Levy SRP Payment in Lieu of Taxes Total Tax Levy & (PILT) PILT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 58,626,946,232 58,873,585,235 50,053,319,295 107 5,862,695 5,887,359 5,005,332 0.0353 0.0353 0.0391 20,468,370 20,581,183 19,368,018 226,942 201,192 202,829 $ $ $ 20,695,312 20,782,375 19,570,847 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Levy Limit FY 2009-10 Library District Self-Imposed Levy Limit A. Adopted Levy A1. Adopted Secondary Tax Levy A2. A1 multiplied by 1.02 $ 20,581,183 20,992,807 B. Current Net Assessed Value Subject to Taxation in Prior Year B5. Net Secondary Assessed Value (partially estimated*) $ 55,965,681,697 C. Current Net Assessed Value C5. Net Secondary Assessed Value $ 57,984,051,718 D. Adopted Calculation D3. Adopted Tax Rate (A2. divided by B5. Multiplied by 100) D5. Adopted Levy Limit (C5. Divided by 100 times D3.) $ $ Maximum Levy Increase: $ 0.0353 20,468,370 (112,813) -0.5% * Current value of property taxed in the prior year is unavailable for centrally valued property. Estimated as follows: Curr. Value locally assessed property taxed in prior year: $ 55,588,886,230 Curr. Value of all centrally assessed property: 2,714,749,057 Total $ 58,303,635,287 Property tax revenue is budgeted in FY 2009-10 based on prior years' collection trends, rather than on the actual levy amount. Each year, approximately 99.0% of the levy amount is collected. The chart below illustrates the estimated collection for FY 2009-10. Property Tax Collection Analysis Library District FY 2009-10 $ Levy Amount 20,468,370 Estimated Collections $ 20,263,686 108 Rate 99.00% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Intergovernmental Revenues Intergovernmental Revenues are amounts received by the Library District from other government or public entities, and include payments in lieu of taxes, grants, and payments required by intergovernmental agreements (IGA’s). Intergovernmental Revenues come from a variety of sources, including the Federal government, local cities and the State of Arizona. Included in the intergovernmental classification are grant revenues that typically carry restrictions on how they may be expended. Payments in Lieu of Taxes Payments in lieu of taxes are collected from the Salt River Project (SRP) and the Federal government. Although it is a public entity, SRP estimates its net assessed value and makes payments in lieu of property taxes to each taxing jurisdiction based on its property tax rates. Charges for Service SRP Payments in Fiscal Year Lieu of Taxes 2001-02 $ 191,864 2002-03 186,473 2003-04 252,593 2004-05 281,442 2005-06 270,953 2006-07 246,032 2007-08 202,829 2008-09* 201,192 2009-10** 226,942 * Projected Actual ** Budget Intergovernmental Charges for Service Intergovernmental Charges for Service include a variety of payments from other jurisdictions, usually as required by Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA’s) with the District. The following table shows the projected and budgeted intergovernmental revenue, by jurisdiction. Intergovernmental Charges for Service Gilbert, Perry Branch Library Surprise/Hollyhock Deer Valley Unified School Dist (lease & library services) Queen Creek Maricopa County Special Healthcare District (automation services) Gilbert, Southeast Regional Library Civic Center Library TOTAL 109 FY 2008-09 $ 1,067,206 82,940 25,408 837,092 10,985 1,456,762 542,763 $ 4,023,156 FY 2009-10 $ 967,206 82,940 24,442 12,000 1,742,350 $ 2,828,938 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Fines and Forfeits Fiscal Year 2001-02 $ 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09* 2009-10** Fines 256,605 339,099 479,128 524,082 621,684 547,589 550,000 609,020 654,696 The District collects fines according to the rates approved by the Board of Directors. The chart to the left illustrates the fines collected from FY 2001-02 through FY 2007-08, the projected amount for FY 2008-09 and the anticipated amount for FY 2009-10. * Projected ** Budget Miscellaneous Revenue The Library District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include vending receipts, sales of copies, interest earnings, building rental, and donations. The chart to the right illustrates the Miscellaneous Revenues from FY 2001-02 through the FY 2009-10 budget. Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09* 2009-10** * Projected ** Budget 110 Miscellaneous Revenue $ 374,637 $ 311,046 $ 531,961 $ 740,186 $ 1,140,257 $ 776,912 $ 684,586 $ 145,373 $ 135,416 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, along with resulting estimated fund balances. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated”, which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. Library District Operating Fund (244) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 12,412,334 $ 14,071,769 $ 14,071,769 $ 16,257,049 $ 11,429,379 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 9,976,131 $ 11,471,769 $ 11,471,769 $ 13,657,049 $ 8,829,379 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 24,760,901 24,760,901 $ $ 21,915,639 21,915,639 $ $ 21,915,639 21,925,943 $ $ 21,157,815 21,157,815 $ $ 21,134,047 21,134,047 $ $ $ $ 18,577,170 7,408,315 25,985,485 $ $ 19,078,544 7,418,619 26,497,163 $ $ 19,078,544 7,408,315 26,486,859 $ 19,132,030 3,591,685 22,723,715 $ 2,837,095 $ 2,837,095 $ 2,580,645 $ 2,002,017 (27) $ - $ - $ - $ - Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: $ 20,916,159 20,916,159 Operating Balance $ 3,844,742 Accounting Adjustments $ Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 13,820,846 $ 6,900,549 $ 6,900,549 $ 8,829,379 $ 7,239,711 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 16,257,049 $ 9,500,549 $ 9,500,549 $ 11,429,379 $ 9,839,711 Library District Intergovernmental Fund (246) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ (568,641) Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (568,641) Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ - $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ 3,396,844 3,396,844 $ $ 3,750,165 3,750,165 $ $ $ 4,694,929 $ 4,694,929 $ 3,965,485 3,965,485 $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ - $ 3,451,965 3,451,965 Operating Balance $ - $ - $ - $ (568,641) $ 298,200 Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ (568,641) $ (270,441) Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ (568,641) $ (270,441) Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST The Library District Intergovernmental Fund revenue is received as a reimbursement which results in a deficit balance at the close of fiscal year-end. 111 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Capital Fund (465) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ 7,439,860 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,439,860 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ - $ $ 7,708,315 $ $ - $ 7,708,315 $ 37,425 7,445,740 $ $ 3,591,685 $ $ $ - $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 $ 5,880 5,880 $ $ 3,137,092 3,137,092 $ $ - $ 9,600,000 9,600,000 Operating Balance $ - $ - $ - $ 37,425 $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ 4,571,223 $ 4,571,223 $ 7,439,860 $ 1,431,545 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ 4,571,223 $ 4,571,223 $ 7,439,860 $ 1,431,545 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 112 FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Library District Grants (242) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ - $ - $ Subtotal $ 75,000 75,000 $ $ 75,000 75,000 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 75,000 $ 75,000 FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 75,000 $ 75,000 MID-YEAR ADJUSTMENTS: Target Grant (C-65-09-006-G-00) OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Target Grant (C-65-09-006-G-00) $ Subtotal $ (75,000) $ (75,000) $ (75,000) (75,000) FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ - $ - FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ - $ - 113 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library District (244) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 19,078,544 $ 21,915,639 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 19,078,544 $ 21,915,639 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: PERSONNEL SAVINGS ADJUSTMENT FY2009-10 Forecast Revenue Adjustment $ $ Subtotal $ 1,097,877 - $ 20,176,421 $ 20,965,731 $ 168,316 (700,000) (173,040) (171,351) (1,044,391) $ 168,316 FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ (949,908) (949,908) BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Revenue Forecast Adjustment Property Tax Revenue Adjustment for Payment in Lieu of Taxes Adjustment for Fines and Forfeits Adjustment for Miscellaneous Revenue Adjustment for IGA Charges for Services Adjustment for Interest Earnings Countywide Electronic Resources Reciprical Borrowing Plan Operating Efficiencies $ - Subtotal $ FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ 19,132,030 EXPENDITURES $ 21,134,047 REVENUE $ Subtotal $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ $ - FY 2009-10 ADOPTED NON-RECURRING BUDGET $ 3,591,685 $ - FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 22,723,715 $ NON-RECURRING NON-RECURRING 0001 Transfer to CIP - Fund 465 114 21,134,047 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library Intergovernmental (246) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: PERSONNEL SAVINGS ADJUSTMENT TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS Structural Balance FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 4,694,929 $ 4,694,929 $ Subtotal $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ $ $ 4,694,929 4,694,929 $ 24,905 $ - $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 24,905 24,905 $ 4,719,834 $ 4,719,834 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: BUDGET BALANCING OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Declining Revenues and Reduced Expenditures from Partner Libraries $ Subtotal $ (1,267,869) $ (1,267,869) $ (969,669) (969,669) FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ 3,451,965 $ 3,750,165 FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 3,451,965 $ 3,750,165 Library District Capital Improvement (465) EXPENDITURES REVENUE NON-OPERATING NON-OPERATING 0001 Transfer to CIP - From Fund 244 $ Subtotal $ - $ $ 3,591,685 3,591,685 $ Subtotal $ 9,600,000 9,600,000 $ $ - FY 2009-10 ADOPTED NON-OPERATING BUDGET $ 9,600,000 $ 3,591,685 FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 9,600,000 $ 3,591,685 NON-OPERATING LDB1 White Tanks Library 115 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Capital Improvement Program Summary A Library District Capital Improvement Fund (465) was established in FY 2008-09 to track the expenditure of capital project spending by the Library District. Project Detail A total of one capital project is identified and adopted by the Library District Board of Directors. Projected Funding Source FY 08-09 White Tanks Branch $ Project Total $ - Year 1 FY 09-10 $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ $ - 116 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ - Year 4 FY 12-13 $ $ - Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ - 5-Year Total $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 Total Project $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Library District Building – White Tank Branch Project Location: At White Tank Regional Park Entrance, North side of White Tank Mountain Rd. 4 Library District None June 2010 County District(s): Managing Department: Project Partner(s): Scheduled Completion Date: Project Description Construction of the White Tank Branch Library will meet the library needs of the residents living in the unincorporated developments east of the White Tank Park. The Library District is receiving contributions for the construction of a library from the developers of these master plan communities. Purpose Statement The purpose of the Library District Building – White Tank Branch project is to provide library service for the residents of Maricopa County so that they have access to a wealth of informational and recreational resources for people of all ages and backgrounds so that they may have the opportunity to expand their horizons through reading and learning. Strategic Goals Addressed Promote, expand, and improve County-sponsored programs and activities for young people in Maricopa County to help them build their skills, develop a sense of civic involvement in the community, and successfully complete their education. Strategic Plan Programs Supported Public Library Service Strategic Plan Activities Supported Public Library Service Result Measures FY 2008-09 Year-To-Date Actual RESULT MEASURE Percent of customers who report that the Library’s collection of books and other materials met their needs 92.5% FY 2008-09 Year-End Projected Projected with Capital Improvement 92.5% 93.0% Funding/Cost Summary Projected Funding Source FY 08-09 White Tanks Branch $ 900,000 Project Total $ 900,000 Year 1 FY 09-10 $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 Year 2 FY 10-11 $ $ - 117 Year 3 FY 11-12 $ $ - Year 4 FY 12-13 $ $ - Year 5 FY 13-14 $ $ - 5-Year Total $ 9,600,000 $ 9,600,000 Total Project $ 10,500,000 $ 10,500,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Library District Operating Cost Summary Year 1 FY 09-10 Year 2 FY 10-11 Year 3 FY 11-12 Year 4 FY 12-13 Year 5 FY 13-14 $ 10,517,043 9,760,433 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,106,525 10,353,761 346,579 $ 21,806,865 $ 11,495,253 10,716,143 358,709 $ 22,570,105 $ 11,897,587 11,091,208 371,264 $ 23,360,059 $ 12,314,003 11,479,400 384,258 $ 24,177,661 Post-Construction Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services $ 10,517,043 Supplies & Services 9,760,433 Capital Outlay 529,561 Total $ 20,807,037 $ 10,730,942 11,353,761 334,859 $ 22,419,562 $ 11,417,034 10,664,065 346,579 $ 22,427,678 $ 12,780,760 11,455,940 358,709 $ 24,595,409 $ 13,228,087 11,856,898 371,264 $ 25,456,249 $ 13,691,070 12,271,889 399,258 $ 26,362,217 $ $ $ $ $ FY 08-09 Current Managing Dept Operating Costs Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay Net Operating Cost Increase (post less current) Personal Services Supplies & Services Capital Outlay $ Total $ - $ 118 - $ 310,509 310,304 620,813 $ 1,285,507 739,797 2,025,304 $ 1,330,500 765,690 2,096,190 $ 1,377,067 792,489 15,000 2,184,556 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Motion Final Budget Adoption (Approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 22, 2009) Convene a public hearing, pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-17104 and 42-17105, to consider and adopt the following: Approve the Fiscal Year 2009-10 Stadium District Budget by total appropriation for each fund and function for Stadium District in the amount of $10,555,364; and set a public hearing to solicit public comment on the FY 2009-10 Budget for June 22, 2009 at 10:00 AM. 119 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District 120 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Transmittal Letter To: Max W. Wilson, Chairman, District 4 Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 The Stadium District’s Adopted expenditure budget for FY 2009-10 is $10,555,364. Included in this amount is $1.8 million for the Chase Field Party Suite Renovations. The Adopted revenue budget is $11,516,235. The stadium is now entering its 12th season of baseball. In keeping with the District’s mission to provide a well-maintained, state-of-the-art facility and the strategic goal of generating on-going revenue, the District completed several projects in FY 2008-09 including the Chase Field Production Room Equipment Project and the Chase Field Flooring Project. The remodeling of all individual suites, as well as field level renovations at Chase Field, are on-going and are expected to continue to generate new long-term suite license agreements, which in turn will generate revenue to the District. Under the Agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks, the District receives 5% of the suite premiums, which currently amounts to more than $300,000 per year. Car Rental Surcharge Revenue Cactus League by Fiscal Year $6,493,520 $6,500,000 $6,286,155 $6,131,305 Revenue $6,000,000 $5,450,000 $5,500,000 $5,402,949 $5,000,000 Car rental surcharge revenues have been decreasing but have been more than adequate to cover the debt service payment on the Cactus League bonds. Once the required debt service payment has been made, and the District’s operations funded, the remaining revenue will be turned over to the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement. I wish to offer my appreciation to the Board of Directors for their support and Fiscal Year guidance during the budget development process. I believe this budget is sustainable, responsible, and aligns with the District’s mission. $4,500,000 FY 06 Actual FY 07 Actual FY 08 Actual FY 09 Forecasted FY 10 Recommended Sincerely, David R. Smith, County Manager 121 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District 122 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Analysis Maria Tutelman, Management & Budget Analyst Mission The mission of the Maricopa County Stadium District is to provide fiscal resources and asset management for the community and visitors to Maricopa County so they can attend Major League Baseball games and other entertainment events in state-of-the-art, well-maintained facilities. Vision Citizens serving citizens by working collaboratively, efficiently, and innovatively. We will be responsive to our customers while being fiscally prudent. Strategic Goals • The District will increase Chase Field revenues for non-baseball activities by 10% within five years beginning July 2006. Status: The District received $661,627 in non-baseball event revenue during FY 20072008. As of the end of the second quarter of FY 2008-2009, the District is projecting $679,808 in non-baseball event revenue. The District is on track to achieve the goal to increase non-baseball revenue by 10%. 123 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Budget Summary Consolidated Budget by Fund Type SPECIAL REVENUE BEG. UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ SOURCES OF FUNDS OPERATING SALES TAXES $ INTEREST EARNINGS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE TRANSFERS IN TOTAL OPERATING SOURCES $ FUND TYPE: CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL DEBT SERVICE 10,264,745 $ - $ TOTAL $ 17,055,105 $ - $ 17,055,105 5,450,000 634,844 5,431,391 3,161,264 14,677,499 $ $ - $ (3,161,264) (3,161,264) $ 5,450,000 634,844 5,431,391 11,516,235 14,677,499 $ (3,161,264) $ 11,516,235 - $ 99,750 4,431,391 493,000 5,024,141 $ 5,450,000 475,094 1,000,000 6,925,094 $ - $ 60,000 1,000,000 1,668,264 2,728,264 $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 5,024,141 $ 6,925,094 $ 2,728,264 USES OF FUNDS OPERATING PERSONAL SERVICES $ SUPPLIES SERVICES CAPITAL OTHER FINANCING USES TOTAL OPERATING USES $ 371,325 5,930 1,760,054 182,961 2,668,264 4,988,534 $ $ - $ 6,432,094 493,000 6,925,094 $ - $ 3,000 3,000 $ 371,325 $ 5,930 1,763,054 6,615,055 3,161,264 11,916,628 $ - $ (3,161,264) (3,161,264) $ 371,325 5,930 1,763,054 6,615,055 8,755,364 - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 1,800,000 NON-RECURRING $ CAPITAL TOTAL NON-RECURRING USES $ TOTAL USES $ 4,988,534 $ STRUCTURAL BALANCE $ 35,607 ENDING UNDESIGNATED FUND BAL. $ 10,300,352 6,925,094 $ 6,790,360 ELIMINATIONS $ $ 1,803,000 $ 13,716,628 $ (3,161,264) $ 10,555,364 $ - $ 2,725,264 $ 2,760,871 $ - $ 2,760,871 $ - $ 7,715,624 $ 18,015,976 $ - $ 18,015,976 124 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses of Funds Sources of Funds (Excluding Fund Balance) $11,516,235 47% 53% Sales Taxes Miscellaneous & Interest Uses of Funds $10,555,364 2% 1% 97% Administrative Services Entertainment Management 125 Finance Management Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Program and Activity FY 2007-08 ACTUAL SOURCES 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT EVEN - EVENTS FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ 568,606 568,606 $ 550,000 550,000 $ 550,000 550,000 $ 550,000 550,000 $ 600,000 600,000 $ 50,000 50,000 9.1% 9.1% 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 23,269,147 8,769,145 14,500,002 $ 11,206,485 6,025,094 5,181,391 $ 11,206,485 6,025,094 5,181,391 $ 11,017,764 5,980,925 5,036,839 $ 10,916,235 6,024,844 4,891,391 $ (290,250) (250) (290,000) -2.6% 0.0% -5.6% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ (1,461,373) $ (1,461,373) - $ - $ 159,287 159,287 $ - $ - TOTAL PROGRAMS $ USES 68EM - ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT $ EVEN - EVENTS 22,376,380 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,727,051 $ 11,516,235 $ 113,909 113,909 $ 104,054 104,054 $ 104,054 104,054 $ 24,892 24,892 $ 104,054 104,054 $ 68FM - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISC - FISCAL RESOURCE ASST - PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT $ 22,199,095 8,255,085 13,944,010 $ 11,534,627 6,201,383 5,333,244 $ 11,884,627 6,201,383 5,683,244 $ 10,919,771 6,002,815 4,916,956 $ 10,188,546 6,203,692 3,984,854 $ 1,696,081 (2,309) 1,698,390 14.3% 0.0% 29.9% 99AS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BDGT - BUDGETING ODIR - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FSAC - FINANCIAL SERVICES HRAC - HUMAN RESOURCES $ 217,874 8,852 139,804 11,171 58,047 $ 228,151 17,888 157,445 17,269 35,549 $ 228,151 17,888 157,445 17,269 35,549 $ 233,358 11,084 145,888 20,210 56,176 $ 229,814 14,494 160,354 20,052 34,914 $ (1,663) 3,394 (2,909) (2,783) 635 -0.7% 19.0% -1.8% -16.1% 1.8% 99GV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT CSCA - CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOC GGOV - GENERAL GOVERNMENT ISFC - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHARGES $ (1,423,738) $ 38,795 (1,462,533) - 39,354 37,512 1,842 $ 39,354 37,512 1,842 $ 39,549 37,707 1,842 $ 32,950 31,921 1,029 $ 6,404 5,591 813 16.3% 14.9% 11,906,186 $ 12,256,186 $ 11,217,570 $ 10,555,364 $ 1,700,822 13.9% TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 21,107,140 $ 126 (240,250) - -2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.1% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Category FY 2007-08 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS TAXES 0606 - SALES TAXES FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ SUBTOTAL $ 6,132,465 6,132,465 $ $ 5,450,000 5,450,000 $ $ 5,450,000 5,450,000 $ $ 5,402,949 5,402,949 $ $ 5,450,000 5,450,000 $ $ MISCELLANEOUS 0645 - INTEREST EARNINGS $ 0650 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE SUBTOTAL $ 1,198,561 4,877,311 6,075,872 $ $ $ 634,844 5,431,391 6,066,235 $ $ 737,263 5,586,839 6,324,102 $ $ 875,094 5,431,391 6,306,485 $ $ 875,094 5,431,391 6,306,485 $ (240,250) -27.5% 0.0% (240,250) -3.8% ALL REVENUES $ 12,208,337 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,727,051 $ 11,516,235 $ (240,250) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0652 - PROCEEEDS FROM FINANCING $ ALL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 10,168,043 10,168,043 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ TOTAL SOURCES $ 22,376,380 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,727,051 $ 11,516,235 $ FY 2007-08 ACTUAL ALL FUNDS PERSONAL SERVICES 0701 - REGULAR PAY $ 0705 - TEMPORARY PAY 0710 - OVERTIME 0750 - FRINGE BENEFITS 0790 - OTHER PERSONNEL SERVICES 0795 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-OUT 0796 - PERSONNEL SERVICES ALLOC-IN SUBTOTAL $ SUPPLIES 0801 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 0804 - NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ SUBTOTAL $ SERVICES 0810 - LEGAL SERVICES $ 0812 - OTHER SERVICES 0820 - RENT & OPERATING LEASES 0825 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 0830 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 0839 - INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES 0841 - TRAVEL 0842 - EDUCATION AND TRAINING 0843 - POSTAGE/FREIGHT/SHIPPING SUBTOTAL $ FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED - (240,250) 279,883 $ 8,456 84,465 (11,073) 11,073 372,804 $ 262,890 $ 2,819 178 63,889 927 (11,072) 11,072 330,703 $ 288,444 $ 8,455 74,426 (11,416) 11,416 371,325 $ (8,561) 1 10,039 343 (343) 1,479 3,514 45 3,559 $ 4,500 2,500 7,000 4,500 2,500 7,000 5,858 1,500 7,358 3,430 2,500 5,930 1,070 1,070 31,842 $ 214,551 2,732 1,740,575 (589) 1,560 6,142 352 1,997,836 $ 65,000 750,162 1,606 2,500 945,262 13,523 3,850 5,550 368 1,788,621 $ $ CAPITAL 0920 - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ 0930 - VEHICLES & CONSTRUCTION EQUIP 0950 - DEBT SERVICE SUBTOTAL $ 5,644,938 18,850,202 $ 5,837,761 9,737,761 TOTAL USES $ 21,107,140 $ 11,906,186 $ $ $ $ 65,000 750,162 1,606 2,500 945,262 13,523 3,850 5,550 368 1,788,621 $ $ $ 5,837,761 10,087,761 $ 12,256,186 $ 127 $ $ 56,568 387,321 1,202 1,500 851,726 13,451 2,590 7,902 188 1,322,866 $ $ $ 673,148 5,833,468 9,556,643 $ 11,217,570 $ -2.0% ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % 279,883 $ 8,456 84,465 (11,073) 11,073 372,804 $ $ -2.0% - 139,964 $ 1,788 53,735 1,002 (12,826) 71,880 255,543 $ $ 0.0% 0.0% $ $ -3.1% 0.0% 11.9% -3.1% -3.1% 0.4% 23.8% 0.0% 15.3% 75,298 759,023 1,606 1,421 911,612 3,419 3,850 5,550 400 1,763,054 $ $ $ 6,615,055 8,415,055 $ (777,294) -13.3% 1,672,706 16.6% $ 10,555,364 $ 1,700,822 $ $ (10,298) -15.8% (8,861) -1.2% 0.0% 1,079 43.2% 33,650 3.6% 10,104 74.7% 0.0% 0.0% (32) -8.7% 25,567 1.4% 13.9% Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Sources and Uses by Fund and Function FY 2007-08 ACTUAL 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % FY 2009-10 ADOPTED $ $ 1,588,648 1,588,648 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 566,111 566,111 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ $ 4,574,852 4,574,852 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ 4,594,625 4,594,625 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ - 0.0% 0.0% $ $ 6,671,849 6,671,849 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,889,266 5,889,266 $ $ 6,925,094 6,925,094 $ $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 16.9% 16.9% $ $ 11,003,564 11,003,564 $ $ 2,960,000 2,960,000 $ $ 2,960,000 2,960,000 $ $ 2,877,217 2,877,217 $ $ 2,728,264 2,728,264 $ $ (231,736) (231,736) -7.8% -7.8% $ $ (1,462,533) $ (1,462,533) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ (1,008,514) (1,008,514) 46.8% 46.8% (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) $ (2,200,168) $ (2,200,168) $ DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL $ 22,376,380 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,727,051 $ 11,516,235 $ (240,250) -2.0% DEPARTMENT TOTAL $ 22,376,380 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,756,485 $ 11,727,051 $ 11,516,235 $ (240,250) -2.0% FY 2007-08 ACTUAL 250 CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 253 BALLPARK OPERATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL 370 STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 OPERATING FUND TOTAL 450 LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE OPERATING NON-RECURRING FUND TOTAL 900 ELIMINATIONS OPERATING FUND TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED ADOPTED VS REVISED VARIANCE % $ $ 1,350,877 1,350,877 $ $ 482,288 482,288 $ $ 482,288 482,288 $ $ 482,187 482,187 $ $ 482,143 482,143 $ $ $ $ 1,160,018 1,160,018 $ $ 3,748,554 3,748,554 $ $ 3,748,554 3,748,554 $ $ 3,303,771 3,303,771 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ (757,837) (757,837) -20.2% -20.2% $ $ 6,862,873 6,862,873 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,922,357 5,922,357 $ $ 6,925,094 6,925,094 $ $ (1,000,000) (1,000,000) -16.9% -16.9% $ $ 3,000 3,900,000 3,903,000 $ 3,000 4,250,000 4,253,000 $ 2,794 3,706,629 3,709,423 $ 3,000 1,800,000 1,803,000 $ $ 13,195,905 13,195,905 $ 2,450,000 2,450,000 0.0% 57.6% 57.6% $ $ (1,462,533) $ (1,462,533) $ (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) $ 1,008,514 1,008,514 -46.8% -46.8% $ $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) $ $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) $ $ (2,200,168) $ (2,200,168) $ 145 145 (749,178) 0.0% 0.0% DEPARTMENT OPERATING TOTAL $ 21,107,140 $ 8,006,186 $ 8,006,186 $ 7,510,941 $ 8,755,364 $ DEPARTMENT NON-RECURRING TOTAL $ - $ 3,900,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 3,706,629 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,450,000 57.6% -9.4% DEPARTMENT TOTAL $ 21,107,140 $ 11,906,186 $ 12,256,186 $ 11,217,570 $ 10,555,364 $ 1,700,822 13.9% Staffing by Program and Activity FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGETING EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAM TOTAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISCAL RESOURCE PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 0.30 2.10 0.30 0.30 3.00 0.30 2.10 0.30 0.30 3.00 0.20 1.70 0.50 0.30 2.70 0.20 2.00 0.40 0.30 2.90 (0.10) (0.10) 0.10 (0.10) (33.33%) (4.76%) 33.33% 0.00% (3.33%) 0.30 (0.10) 0.20 0.00% 17.65% (20.00%) 0.00% 7.41% 1.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 1.30 2.30 5.00 1.00 1.10 2.10 5.00 0.10 0.10 - 0.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% (0.20) (0.20) - 0.00% (15.38%) (8.70%) 0.00% 128 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Staffing by Market Range Title FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) Executive Assistant Office Assistant Director - Stadium District Program Coordinator Accountant Finan/Business Analyst - Dept Project Manager Deptartment Total FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2008-09 REVISED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2008-09 FORECAST 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 0.00% 1.00 0.00% (1.00) -100.00% (1.00) -100.00% 1.00 0.00% 0.00% FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % .00 0.00% .00 0.00% .00 0.00% .00 .00 .00 0.00% .00 0.00% .00 0.00% REVISED VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 0.00% 0.00% FORECAST VS ADOPTED VARIANCE % 0.00% 0.00% Staffing By Fund FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT TOTAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 FY 2008-09 REVISED 5.00 5.00 FY 2008-09 FORECAST 5.00 5.00 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED 5.00 5.00 General Adjustments Base Adjustments: • Right-size internal service charges, increasing by $70, in Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating budget. Programs and Activities Entertainment Management Program The purpose of the Entertainment Management Program is to provide ticketing and entertainment event services to the Maricopa County community and visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Program Results Measure Description % change in District Event revenue % change in District event participants % change in Day Use Event net revenue % change in Day Use Events % of District Event usage days booked FY 2008 Actual (2.0%) Not Reported (38.5%) (64.8%) 100.0% FY 2009 Revised 6.7% (0.3%) (100.0%) (100.0%) 100.0% FY 2010 Variance % Variance Adopted Revised - Adopted Revised - Adopted 9.7% 3.0% 43.9% 14.3% 14.6% -4982.0% Not Reported Not Reported 15.1% (84.9%) -84.9% Activities that comprise this program include: • Events Events Activity The purpose of the Events Activity is to provide entertainment services to the Maricopa County community and its visitors so they can attend baseball and other entertainment events. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. 129 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Measure Description % of District Event usage days booked Result % change in District event participants Result Result % change in District Event revenue % change in Day Use Event net revenue Result Output % change in Day Use Events # of booked District Event usage days Output Output FY 2008 Actual 100.0% FY 2009 Revised 100.0% (0.3%) 14.3% 14.6% -4982.0% (2.0%) (38.5%) 6.7% (100.0%) 9.7% Not Reported 3.0% 43.9% (64.8%) 63 (100.0%) 50 Not Reported Not Reported # of District Event participants $ Day Use Event net revenue generated 84,752 24,813 84,000 0 Not Reported Not Reported Output Output Demand # of Day Use Events $ District event revenue generated $ District Event revenue to be generated 19 550,000 550,000 0 550,000 Not Reported Not Reported 600,000 600,000 50,000 9.1% Demand 25,000 550,000 0 -550,000 -100.0% 38 120 0 120 0 365 0 245 204.2% Demand $ Day use event net revenue expected to be generated # of expected day use events # of expected available District Event usage days # of expected District event participants 84,000 84,000 96,000 12,000 14.3% Efficiency $ spent/ $ generated in District revenue $ 0.21 $ 0.02 8.3% Efficiency $ spent / # of booked District Event usage days (Budget/# of booked District Event Usage Days) $ spent/# of District Event participants $ 1,808.08 $ 2,081.08 Not Reported $ 1.34 $ 1.24 Not Reported Demand Demand Efficiency Not Reported FY 2010 Variance % Variance Adopted Revised - Adopted Revised - Adopted 15.1% (84.9%) -84.9% 0.19 $ 0.17 $ Efficiency $ spent/ $ Day Use Event revenue generated $ 4.59 Not Reported Not Reported Efficiency Revenue Total $ spent / # of day use events $ 5,995.21 Not Reported Not Reported 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE TOTAL SOURCES $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 50,000 50,000 9.1% $ 545,352 $ 23,254 568,606 $ 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS TOTAL USES $ $ 113,909 $ 113,909 $ 104,054 $ 104,054 $ 104,054 $ 104,054 $ - 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% Expenditure Activity Narrative: The demand for this activity is dependent on the performance of the Diamondbacks and the additional booking events scheduled by the booking manager. The variance in district event revenue to be generated is attributed to day use events now being incorporated in district events. Financial Management Program The purpose of the Financial Management Program is to provide fiscal resources and asset management of Cactus League Facilities and Chase Field for the Board of Directors of the Stadium District, the community, and for its visitors, in order to ensure sound fiscal management of publicly owned facilities. 130 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Program Results Measure Description % of customer satisfied % change in revenue FY 2008 Actual 95.0% (1.1%) FY 2009 Revised 95.0% (12.8%) Activities that comprise this program include: • Fiscal Resource FY 2010 Variance % Variance Adopted Revised - Adopted Revised - Adopted 95.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0.0%) 12.8% -100.0% • Physical Asset Management Fiscal Resource Activity The purpose of the Fiscal Resource Activity is to provide Financial Management Services for the community and for its visitors so that they can be protected from future capital repair expenditures to Chase Field by increasing Financial Reserves. Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Output Demand Efficiency Revenue Measure Description FY 2008 Actual (1.1%) 12,208,335 11,980,867 $0.68 % change in revenue $ generated in revenue $ revenue expected to be generated $ spent/$ revenue generated 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 1,588,648 $ 198,680 6,671,849 309,968 $ 8,769,145 $ $ 1,346,538 $ 45,608 6,862,873 $ 8,255,019 $ FY 2009 Revised (12.8%) 10,856,485 10,434,704 $0.57 FY 2010 Variance % Variance Adopted Revised - Adopted Revised - Adopted (0.0%) 12.8% -100.0% 5,907,543 -4,948,942 -45.6% 6,024,844 -4,409,860 -42.3% $1.05 -$0.48 -83.8% 517,750 $ 75,000 5,925,094 (492,750) 6,025,094 $ 517,750 $ 75,000 5,925,094 (493,000) 6,024,844 $ (250) (250) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 480,412 $ 288,627 5,925,094 (492,750) 6,201,383 $ 481,276 $ 290,322 5,925,094 (493,000) 6,203,692 $ (864) (1,695) 250 (2,309) -0.2% -0.6% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% Expenditure 250 - CACTUS LEAGUE OPERATIONS 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES Base Adjustments: • Reduce the Operating Expenditure budget $145 in the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) to right by adjusting internal service charges. • Net impact of $0 in the Operating Revenue budget in Cactus League Operations Fund (250) for the decrease in interest earnings of $250 and the increase in the transfer in of $250 from car rental surcharge. This also is a net impact of $0 in the Operating Expenditure budget in the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) related to the increase in the transfer out of $250 and the decrease in the debt payment of $250. Activity Narrative: The department’s measures will be updated during FY 2009-10. measures are not useful in determining the activity’s results. Current Physical Asset Management Activity The purpose of the Physical Asset Management Activity is to provide oversight of Chase Field maintenance and use agreements for the users of Chase Field so that they can enjoy a safe and well maintained facility and be protected from future capital repair expenditures to Chase Field by increasing capital reserves. 131 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Mandates: This is a non-mandated Activity. Performance Analysis: Measure Type Result Output Output Efficiency Measure Description % of customer satisfied Number of items in compliance Number of items tested $ Total activity expenditure per item in compliance FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Variance % Variance Actual Revised Adopted Revised - Adopted Revised - Adopted 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 0.0% 0.0% Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Revenue 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL SOURCES $ 3,830,820 $ 10,669,182 3,881,391 $ $ 14,500,002 $ 2,960,000 (1,660,000) 5,181,391 $ $ 748,105 $ 3,090,244 $ 3,831,391 $ 1,000,000 2,728,264 (2,668,264) 4,891,391 $ (50,000) 1,000,000 (231,736) (1,008,264) (290,000) 3,850,118 $ 1,000,000 1,803,000 (2,668,264) 3,984,854 $ (759,874) (1,000,000) 2,450,000 1,008,264 1,698,390 -1.3% -7.8% 60.7% -5.6% Expenditure 253 - BALLPARK OPERATIONS 370 - STADIUM DIST DEBT SERIES02 450 - LONG TERM PROJECT RESERVE 900 - ELIMINATIONS TOTAL USES 13,195,905 $ 13,944,010 $ 4,253,000 (1,660,000) 5,683,244 $ -24.6% 57.6% 0.0% 29.9% Base Adjustments: • Increase the Non-Recurring Expenditure budget by $1,800,000 in the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450) to upgrade the Stadium’s Party Suites as recommended by an independent assessment on facility maintenance. • Reduce the Operating Revenue budget $240,000 in the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450) for decreased interest earnings. • Increase the Operating Expenditure budget by $1,000,000 in the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) for the transfer to the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) to provide funding for the repayment of the loan to the Diamondbacks for the video board construction project. This also increases the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) Operating Expenditure and Revenue budgets by $1,000,000. • Increase the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating Expenditure budget by $8,264 to adjust the amount of the transfer of ½ the net revenue from the prior fiscal year to the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450). This also increases the Long-Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Operating Revenue budget by $8,264. • Reduce the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) Operating Expenditure budget by $259,288 to insure the fund maintains structural balance. This adjustment includes a $202,642 reduction for the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) transfer, as the loan to the Diamondbacks for the sound system was paid off. Activity Narrative: The department’s measures will be updated during FY 2009-10. measures are not useful in determining the activity’s results. 132 Current Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Revenue Sources and Variance Commentary Special Sales Tax In FY 1994-95, State Legislation allowed the Stadium District to collect a special 0.25% sales tax for two years for the construction of the Chase Field. $238,000,000 of the $253,000,000 total cost to construct Chase Field was funded through the use of the special sales tax levy. The District obtained a loan from the Diamondbacks for the remainder of the total cost which was paid off in June of 2007. The car rental surcharge established by A.R.S. §48-4234 is used to repay Stadium District Revenue Bonds for Chase Field or the Cactus League and to fund Cactus League operations. Any net revenue is transferred to the Arizona Tourism and Sport Authority (AZTSA) according to an intergovernmental agreement. Pursuant to A.R.S. §48-4234, the District may set the car rental surcharge at $2.50 for each lease or rental of a motor vehicle licensed for hire for less than one year and designed to carry fewer than 15 passengers, regardless of whether such vehicle is licensed in the State of Arizona. The District Board of Directors initially levied a car rental surcharge at a rate of $1.50 beginning in January 1992. The District Board of Directors increased the surcharge to $2.50, the maximum amount permitted by Statute, in January 1993. Fiscal Year Stadium District Car Rental Surcharge 1996-97 $ 5,326,147 1997-98 5,443,369 1998-99 5,400,000 1999-00 5,722,238 2000-01 5,637,184 2001-02 5,536,163 2002-03 4,865,038 2003-04 5,556,717 2004-05 6,024,416 2005-06 6,498,814 2006-07 6,288,093 2007-08 6,132,465 2008-09 * 5,402,949 2009-10 ** 5,450,000 * Forecasted ** Budgeted Stadium District Major League Baseball $ 96,058,302 35,997,339 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 133 Total $ 101,384,449 41,440,708 5,400,000 5,722,238 5,637,184 5,536,163 4,865,038 5,556,717 6,024,416 6,493,520 6,286,155 6,132,465 5,402,949 5,450,000 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Miscellaneous Revenue Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 * 2009-10 ** * Forecasted ** Budget The Stadium District classifies miscellaneous revenues as any revenues that do not fall within a more specific revenue category. Examples of miscellaneous revenues include receipts from the agreements with the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball organization, the booking manager and interest earnings. The chart at the right illustrates the miscellaneous revenues from FY 2001-02 through the FY 2009-10 Budget. Other Financing Sources Other Financing Sources solely comprise Fund Transfers In. Fund Transfers Miscellaneous Revenue $ 4,953,957 5,071,762 4,916,724 5,276,945 6,000,467 7,269,570 6,075,872 6,324,102 6,066,235 Revenue is transferred between the Stadium District funds to provide resources for operations and capital improvements. Under an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (AZSTA), the District transfers any remaining revenue after debt payments, required reserves, and operations from the Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250). The remaining revenue is then sent to the AZSTA to be used for Cactus League purposes. Additionally each year, half the net revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) is transferred to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450). These transfers are made as required under the agreements with the baseball team. The funds will be utilized to maintain and improve the facility. Beginning in FY 2009-10, transfers from Stadium District Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to Stadium District Debt Service Fund (370) will be made for loan repayments. Fund Transfers $4,485,379 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,161,264 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,066,807 $2,200,168 $1,813,912 $1,462,533 $1,372,050 $1,003,599 $1,000,000 $500,000 $2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 134 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Beginning Fund Balance and Variance Commentary The following schedule lists the estimated beginning fund balances, projected revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as resulting estimated fund balances at the end of FY 2009-10. “Beginning fund balance” represents resources accumulated within each fund as of the start of the fiscal year, based on actual and projected revenues and expenditures for prior fiscal years. For budgeting purposes, fund balances are “Unreserved/Undesignated,” which means that estimated unreserved fund balances are reduced by amounts designated for other purposes. The Stadium District has no fund balance designations at this time. The process for estimating all beginning fund balances for FY 2009-10 begins with audited actual fund balance information at the end of FY 2007-08, as presented in the Maricopa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The “unreserved fund balance” is used. Cactus League Operations (250) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 2,914,188 $ 3,079,219 $ 3,079,219 $ 3,151,958 $ 3,235,882 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 2,914,188 $ 3,079,219 $ 3,079,219 $ 3,151,958 $ 3,235,882 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 1,588,648 1,588,648 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 517,750 517,750 $ $ 566,111 566,111 $ $ 517,750 517,750 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 1,350,877 1,350,877 $ $ 482,288 482,288 $ $ 482,288 482,288 $ $ 482,187 482,187 $ $ 482,143 482,143 Operating Balance $ 237,771 $ 35,462 $ 35,462 $ 83,924 $ 35,607 Accounting Adjustments $ (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 3,151,958 $ 3,114,681 $ 3,114,681 $ 3,235,882 $ 3,271,489 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 3,151,958 $ 3,114,681 $ 3,114,681 $ 3,235,882 $ 3,271,489 Ballpark Operations (253) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 2,326,098 $ 4,189,756 $ 4,189,756 $ 5,738,009 $ 7,028,863 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 2,326,098 $ 4,189,756 $ 4,189,756 $ 5,738,009 $ 7,028,863 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 4,574,852 4,574,852 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 $ $ 4,594,625 4,594,625 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 1,160,018 1,160,018 $ $ 3,748,554 3,748,554 $ $ 3,748,554 3,748,554 $ $ 3,303,771 3,303,771 $ $ 4,506,391 4,506,391 Operating Balance $ 3,414,834 $ 757,837 $ 757,837 $ 1,290,854 $ - Accounting Adjustments $ (2,923) $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 5,738,009 $ 4,947,593 $ 4,947,593 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 5,738,009 $ 4,947,593 $ 4,947,593 $ 7,028,863 $ 7,028,863 135 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series 02 (370) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 ADOPTED Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ 255,761 $ 255,761 $ - $ - Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ 255,761 $ 255,761 $ - $ - Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 6,671,849 6,671,849 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,889,266 5,889,266 $ $ 6,925,094 6,925,094 Uses: Operating Total Uses: $ $ 6,862,873 6,862,873 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,925,094 5,925,094 $ $ 5,922,357 5,922,357 $ $ 6,925,094 6,925,094 Operating Balance $ (191,024) $ - $ - $ (33,091) $ - Accounting Adjustments $ 191,024 $ - $ - $ 33,091 $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ - $ 255,761 $ 255,761 $ - $ - Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ - $ 255,761 $ 255,761 $ - $ - Long Term Project Reserve (450) Fund Balance Summary FY 2007-08 ACTUAL FY 2008-09 ADOPTED FY 2008-09 REVISED FY 2008-09 FORECAST FY 2009-10 RECOMM Beginning Unreserved Fund Balance $ 9,814,906 $ 7,504,359 $ 7,504,359 $ 7,622,566 $ 6,790,360 Beginning Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 9,814,906 $ 7,504,359 $ 7,504,359 $ 7,622,566 $ 6,790,360 Sources: Operating Total Sources: $ $ 11,003,564 11,003,564 $ $ 2,960,000 2,960,000 $ $ 2,960,000 2,960,000 $ $ 2,877,217 2,877,217 $ $ 2,728,264 2,728,264 $ $ $ 2,794 3,706,629 3,709,423 $ $ 3,000 4,250,000 4,253,000 $ $ 3,000 3,900,000 3,903,000 $ $ 13,195,905 13,195,905 $ 3,000 1,800,000 1,803,000 Operating Balance $ (2,192,341) $ 2,957,000 $ 2,957,000 $ 2,874,423 $ 2,725,264 Accounting Adjustments $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Unreserved/Undesignated Fund Balance $ 7,622,566 $ 6,561,359 $ 6,211,359 $ 6,790,360 $ 7,715,624 Ending Unreserved Fund Balance $ 7,622,566 $ 6,561,359 $ 6,211,359 $ 6,790,360 $ 7,715,624 Uses: Operating Non-Recurring Total Uses: 136 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Appropriated Budget Reconciliations Cactus League Operations Fund (250) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 482,288 $ 517,750 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment for Base Level Telecommunication Charges $ Reduce Other Revenue Sources Increase Transfer from Car Rental Surcharge from the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) Subtotal $ FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ (145) $ - (250) 250 (145) $ 482,143 $ 517,750 Ballpark Operations Fund (253) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 3,748,554 $ 4,506,391 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 3,748,554 $ 4,506,391 FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 3,748,554 $ 4,506,391 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS: PERSONNEL SAVINGS ADJUSTMENT $ 8,791 $ - FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 3,757,345 $ 4,506,391 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment for unemployment and workers compensation charges $ 70 $ Adjustment for transfer to the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) for loan repayment to Diamondbacks for construction of the video board Adjustment for transfer to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) of 1/2 net revenue in the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) from the prior fiscal year Structural adjustment, including $202,642 reduction for the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) transfer Subtotal $ FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ 137 - 1,000,000 - 8,264 - (259,288) - 749,046 $ - 4,506,391 $ 4,506,391 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 5,925,094 $ 5,925,094 1,000,000 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment for the Transfer from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) for Repayment $ of the Loan to Diamondbacks for Suites Renovation Adjustment for Decrease in Debt Payment Increase the to the Transfer to Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Subtotal $ $ 1,000,000 (250) 250 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET 6,925,094 6,925,094 $ $ Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ 3,000 $ 2,960,000 FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ 3,000 $ 2,960,000 FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ 3,000 $ 2,960,000 FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ 3,000 $ 2,960,000 BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment for Reduced Revenue from Lower Interest Rates $ Adjustment for the Transfer of 1/2 the Net Revenue from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) from the Prior Fiscal Year Subtotal $ - $ (240,000) 8,264 - $ (231,736) $ 3,000 EXPENDITURES $ 2,728,264 REVENUE $ Subtotal $ 1,800,000 1,800,000 $ $ - FY 2009-10 RECOMMENDED NON-RECURRING BUDGET $ 1,800,000 $ - FY 2009-10 TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGET $ 1,803,000 $ 2,728,264 FY 2009-10 RECOMMENDED OPERATING BUDGET NON-RECURRING SUITE RENOVATION PROJECT (BPSR) Adjustment for Party Suites Renovation 138 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Eliminations Fund (900) EXPENDITURES REVENUE OPERATING FY 2008-09 ADOPTED BUDGET $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) FY 2008-09 REVISED BUDGET $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) FY 2008-09 REVISED RESTATED BUDGET $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) FY 2009-10 BUDGET TARGET $ (2,152,750) $ (2,152,750) (8,264) $ (8,264) BASE ADJUSTMENTS: OTHER BASE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment for the Transfer of 1/2 the prior Fiscal Year Net Revenue in the Ballpark $ Operations Fund (253) to the Long Term Project Reserve Fund (450) Adjustment for the Transfer from the Ballpark Operations Fund (253) to the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) for Loan Repayment to Diamondbacks for Construction of the Video Board Adjustment for the Increase in the Transfer from the Stadium District Debt Series 02 Fund (370) to the Cactus League Operations Fund (250) Subtotal $ FY 2009-10 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET $ 139 (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (250) (250) (1,008,514) $ (1,008,514) (3,161,264) $ (3,161,264) Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Debt Service The Stadium District was formed through action of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in September 1991 pursuant to the A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26. The Stadium District has two purposes: • • To oversee the operation and maintenance of Chase Field, a major league baseball stadium, and; Enhance and promote major league baseball spring training in the County through the development of new, and the improvement of, existing baseball training facilities. To accomplish these purposes, the Stadium District possesses the statutory authority to issue special obligation bonds to provide financial assistance for the development and improvement of baseball training facilities located within the County. Debt Issuance History The Stadium District has used debt financing for many years to finance capital projects. The following chart illustrates the amount of debt, as well as categories of outstanding debt for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES All Categories of Debt (2) Maricopa County Stadium District, As of June 30, 2008 Year Ending June 30 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITES: Bonds, loans, and other payables: Stadium District revenue bonds Stadium District contractual obligations Stadium District loans payable Total Governmental activities $ 55,225,000 $ 52,735,000 $ 6,428,888 4,428,888 0 0 0 57,163,888 $ $ 61,653,888 $ 50,050,000 $ 2,428,888 52,478,888 $ 47,230,000 $ 44,270,000 0 0 978,394 10,864,916 48,208,394 $ 55,134,916 The Stadium District Revenue Bonds are special obligations of the District. The bonds are payable solely from pledged revenues, consisting of car rental surcharges levied and collected by the District pursuant to A.R.S., Title 48, Chapter 26, Article 2, §48-4234. The bonds do not constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith or credit of Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or any other political subdivision. The payment of the bonds is enforceable solely out of the pledged revenues, and no owner shall have any right to compel any exercise of taxing power of the District, except for surcharges. 140 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District The following tables illustrate the existing debt service for the outstanding Stadium District Revenue Bonds. DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Revenue Bonds Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2008 Year Ending June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 – 18 2019 Total $ $ Principal 3,105,000 3,260,000 3,390,000 3,570,000 3,760,000 22,040,000 5,145,000 44,270,000 $ $ Interest 2,314,344 2,159,094 2,028,694 1,850,719 1,663,294 5,060,563 276,544 15,353,252 Total Debt Service $ 5,419,344 5,419,094 5,418,694 5,420,719 5,423,294 27,100,563 5,421,544 $ 59,623,252 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING BY ISSUE As of June 30, 2008 Bond Issue Total Stadium District Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Amount $ 44,270,000 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Stadium District Revenue Bonds Interest Principal $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 FY FY 08 -0 9 09 FY 10 10 FY 11 11 FY 12 12 FY 13 13 FY 14 14 FY 15 15 FY 16 16 FY 17 17 FY 18 18 FY 19 19 -2 0 $0 141 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments of the relative credit worthiness of municipal securities are provided by rating agencies. They furnish letter grades that convey their assessment of the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. Credit ratings issued by these agencies are a major function in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and Fitch Ratings are the three major rating agencies that rate municipal debt. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for the Stadium District. There are five primary factors that comprise their ratings: • • • • • Economic conditions – stability of trends, Debt-history of District – debt and debt position, Governmental/administration – leadership and organizational structure of the District, Financial performance – current financial status and the history of financial reports, Debt management – debt policies, including long-term planning. Each of the rating agencies has its own method of assigning a rating on the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay in full and on time. Issuers must pay a fee for the opportunity to have one or more rating agencies rate existing and proposed debt issuance. The following chart outlines how the ratings reflect creditworthiness, ranging from very strong securities to speculative and default situations. Examples of the rating systems are: RATING AGENCIES BOND RATINGS Explanation bond ratings of corporate/municipal Fitch Moody’s Standard Poor’s Premium quality AAA Aaa AAA High quality AA Aa AA Medium quality A A A Medium grade, lower quality BBB Baa BBB Predominantly speculative BB Ba BB Speculative, low grade B B B Poor to default CCC Caa CCC Highest speculation CC Ca CC Lowest quality, no interest C C C In default, in arrears Questionable value DDD DDD DD DD D D 142 & Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District Fitch and Standard & Poor’s may use “+” or “-” to modify ratings while Moody’s may use numerical modifiers such as 1 (highest), 2, or 3. The following illustrates the Stadium District’s debt rating. Type of Debt Fitch Stadium District Revenue Bonds Date Date Date Rating Rating Standard & Rating Assigned Moody's Assigned Poor's Assigned Aaa (1) AAA (1) (1) Bonds are insured, no underlying rating. Stadium District Loans Payable On July 25, 2006, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the enhancement of the sound system at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $679,295 of the funding for the enhancement; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over the next two years, ending December 2008. This has been paid back. On January 23, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Arizona Diamondbacks (Team) for the renovation of suites at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $537,723 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over the next four years, ending December 2010. On September 10, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for the purchase of a video board and related equipment. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $8,273,928 of the funding for the purchase; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten years, beginning December 2009 and ending in December 2018. On October 12, 2007, the Stadium District entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the Team for phase II of the suite renovations at Chase Field. Under the terms of the agreement, the Team provided $1,832,928 of the funding for the renovations; and the agreement states that the Stadium District will pay the Team back over ten years, beginning December 2011 and ending in December 2020. 143 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Stadium District DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY Stadium District Loans Payable Maricopa County, Arizona As of June 30, 2008 Year Ending June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014-18 2019-21 Total Principal $ 399,577 1,179,241 1,179,241 1,200,000 1,200,000 5,273,928 432,929 $ 10,864,916 144 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Motion Final Budget Adoption (Approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 22, 2009) Convene a public hearing, pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-17104 and 42-17105, to consider and adopt the following: Approve the Fiscal Year 2009-10 Budget for the County Improvement Districts per the FY 2009-10 Budget Schedules entitled “District Assessment of Special Districts” and “Street Lighting Improvement District Levies.” 145 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District 146 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Direct Assessment Special Districts MARICOPA COUNTY DIRECT ASSESSMENT SPECIAL DISTRICTS FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DIST. NO. DISTRICT NAME LEVY PURPOSE K-91 Queen Creek Water Improv Bond Interest Bond redemption ESTIMATED 2008-09 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 2008-09 1,314 1,314 3,040 3,040 4,353 4,353 2009-10 LESS 2009-10 BUDGET AVAILABLE DIRECT REQUEST FUNDS ASSESSMENT 940 0 940 2,410 0 2,410 3,350 0 3,350 K-100 Marquerite Drive Bond Interest Bond redemption 385 0 385 385 0 385 290 0 290 0 0 0 290 0 290 K-106 7th Street North Improv. Bond Interest Bond redemption 2,349 6,006 8,355 2,349 6,006 8,355 2,015 2,336 4,351 0 0 0 2,015 2,336 4,351 K-109 Plymouth Street Bond Interest Bond redemption 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,510 14,597 25,107 0 0 0 10,510 14,597 25,107 192nd Ave. Avenida del Sol Circle City Community Park Estrella Dells Queen Creek Water Improv 20th Street General General General General General General Subtotal 420 210 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,205 135,835 420 210 16,000 94,000 16,000 9,205 135,835 367 245 16,000 175,000 16,000 8,731 216,343 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 367 245 16,000 175,000 16,000 8,731 216,343 Total $166,849 $166,849 $249,441 $0 $249,441 28548 28532 28795 28529 28793 28835 147 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13001 13003 13005 13010 13051 13056 13057 13059 13069 13070 13072 13075 13078 13079 13103 13107 13109 13121 13122 13128 13132 13147 13169 13176 13177 13178 13184 13188 13191 13203 DESCRIPTION Sun City 38B Sunrise Unit 5 Ph 2 Golden West 2 Empire Gardens 2 Towne Meadows The Vineyards of Mesa Clark Acres Country Meadows 9 Sun Lakes 09 Camelot Golf Club Est. 1 Desert Sands Golf & CC 3 Litchfield Park 19 Sunrise Meadows 1 Estate Ranchos Desert Foothills Est 5 Desert Foothills Est 6 Apache Wells Mobile P 3A Desert Sands Golf & CC 4 Sun Lakes 07 Litchfield Park 17 Valencia Village Superstition View #1 Sun Lakes 22 Villa Royale Coronado Acres Sun Lakes 10 Hopeville Sun Lakes 21 Dreamland Villa-19 Sun Lakes 19 3,010 3,270 8,953 1,100 22,275 9,857 813 20,923 2,534 4,451 5,915 6,124 220 998 3,878 5,366 2,200 9,835 3,565 4,399 7,827 3,646 4,481 660 652 7,918 1,830 11,609 866 5,502 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 3,059 3,307 9,869 1,214 24,572 10,854 895 21,154 2,788 4,907 6,506 6,178 243 1,103 4,273 5,908 2,427 10,844 3,928 4,486 8,040 4,022 4,930 728 705 8,721 1,881 12,774 955 6,052 148 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 600 1,249,216 0.0480 2,160 1,511,220 0.1429 11,097 2,694,946 0.4118 1,413 371,560 0.3803 29,161 11,434,144 0.2550 12,734 3,108,820 0.4096 941 469,200 0.2006 25,159 3,682,784 0.6832 3,285 1,146,456 0.2865 5,763 1,437,243 0.4010 7,558 1,368,645 0.5522 6,987 2,938,280 0.2378 293 6,827,613 0.0043 1,309 869,610 0.1505 4,978 2,351,250 0.2117 7,263 2,528,956 0.2872 2,702 599,243 0.4509 12,541 2,469,348 0.5079 4,441 1,584,410 0.2803 5,092 1,321,420 0.3853 9,561 1,915,689 0.4991 4,825 996,246 0.4843 5,604 5,666,428 0.0989 819 1,225,566 0.0668 807 321,660 0.2509 9,830 4,751,142 0.2069 2,436 451,549 0.5395 14,465 7,585,998 0.1907 1,031 485,216 0.2125 6,772 3,861,250 0.1754 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13210 13219 13220 13221 13223 13226 13228 13247 13248 13263 13264 13268 13271 13281 13287 13288 13290 13291 13298 13303 13310 13311 13312 13315 13316 13325 13326 13329 13330 13331 13335 13343 13346 13348 13349 13351 DESCRIPTION Crestview Manor Sun Lakes 12 Sun Lakes 14 Sun Lakes 16 &16A Sun Lakes 18 Sun Lakes 11 & 11A Crimson Cove Sun City 57 Apache Wells Mobile P 3B Sun City 10 Sun Lakes 03A Sun Lakes 08 Mesquite Trails Sun City 10A Empire Gardens 3 Empire Gardens 4 Sun Lakes 15 Sun City 50A Sun City West Sun Lakes 17 Casa Mia 2A Pomeroy Estates Rio Vista West 2 Apache Wells Mobile P 6 Sun City 44 Queen Creek Plaza Rio Vista West Desert Saguaro Estates 1 Sun City 45 Sun City 46 Casa Mia 2B Knott Manor Circle City Desert Saguaro Estates 2 Sun City 47 Sun City 38 866 8,071 6,581 10,427 14,153 1,477 1,948 12,357 3,300 28,750 2,050 3,502 3,829 26,896 1,100 1,286 6,225 4,215 875,238 11,405 2,200 2,524 188 2,860 21,233 2,321 5,364 4,112 16,825 11,243 2,640 2,004 3,403 1,731 24,468 3,203 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 955 8,887 7,245 11,479 15,575 1,627 2,149 12,483 3,641 28,983 2,257 3,851 4,224 27,110 1,214 1,419 6,855 4,264 873,830 12,550 2,427 2,779 207 3,155 21,483 2,483 5,912 4,537 16,957 11,331 2,912 2,207 3,446 1,910 24,624 3,228 149 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 1,165 338,900 0.3438 9,902 3,853,917 0.2569 8,290 3,336,408 0.2485 13,091 4,919,440 0.2661 17,423 6,715,472 0.2594 1,790 1,826,700 0.0980 2,210 304,568 0.7256 14,207 2,540,634 0.5592 4,104 1,055,805 0.3887 32,358 6,017,992 0.5377 2,493 795,066 0.3136 4,199 1,010,558 0.4155 5,238 1,397,415 0.3748 30,176 5,194,928 0.5809 1,383 391,250 0.3535 1,630 415,440 0.3924 7,694 3,542,938 0.2172 4,714 679,330 0.6939 943,654 285,919,589 0.3300 14,135 5,526,250 0.2558 2,844 784,726 0.3624 3,030 970,640 0.3122 120 478,062 0.0251 3,499 1,187,509 0.2947 24,025 3,834,260 0.6266 2,636 407,398 0.6470 6,977 1,274,556 0.5474 5,299 1,062,558 0.4987 19,149 3,447,656 0.5554 12,662 3,042,281 0.4162 3,318 1,163,010 0.2853 2,447 366,532 0.6676 3,959 2,055,786 0.1926 2,255 748,810 0.3011 27,683 4,614,122 0.6000 3,729 444,336 0.8392 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13352 13354 13356 13357 13358 13359 13361 13362 13363 13364 13371 13372 13374 13375 13376 13383 13386 13392 13393 13394 13395 13396 13397 13401 13402 13404 13417 13418 13419 13420 13421 13422 13423 13424 13432 13433 DESCRIPTION Mesa East Sun City 49 Desert Sands Golf & CC 6 Desert Sands Golf & CC 7 Sun City 38A Velda Rose Estates East 5 Sun Lakes 04 Sun Lakes 05 Sun Lakes 06 Sun City 48 Oasis Verde Sun City 15D Sun City 51 Sun City 52 Sun City 50 Sun City West Expansion I Litchfield Park 18 Sun City 41 Sun City 53 Sun City 54 Sun City 55 Desert Skies 2 Sun City 56 Sun City 33 Rancho Del Sol 2 Sun City 17E F&G Western Ranchettes AZ Skies Mobile Est E2 Sun City 35 Az Skies Mobil Estates Sun City 28A Velda Rose Estates East 3 Velda Rose Estates East 4 Linda Vista Sun City 17H Sun Lakes 01 21,547 26,577 2,640 4,400 3,260 2,592 6,493 13,299 10,427 19,554 7,283 5,375 16,686 15,580 10,478 150,533 5,265 12,554 37,180 22,836 23,484 2,187 5,312 27,062 2,814 11,003 3,298 3,246 33,097 4,112 2,990 1,082 1,515 3,954 4,342 6,915 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 23,764 26,792 2,912 4,854 3,291 2,859 7,163 14,088 11,492 19,826 8,017 5,442 16,824 15,707 10,567 151,462 5,313 12,898 37,483 23,032 23,293 2,411 5,356 27,270 3,104 11,109 3,578 3,582 33,328 4,537 3,016 1,194 1,671 4,362 4,404 7,163 150 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 27,853 5,066,821 0.5497 30,221 5,453,366 0.5542 3,476 844,183 0.4118 5,699 938,001 0.6076 3,813 450,440 0.8465 3,224 791,312 0.4074 8,255 3,753,717 0.2199 15,899 3,721,578 0.4272 12,846 4,427,148 0.2902 22,002 5,409,162 0.4068 9,432 1,937,418 0.4868 6,098 566,737 1.0760 18,795 3,436,234 0.5470 17,629 3,712,259 0.4749 12,021 2,807,312 0.4282 160,740 44,031,012 0.3651 6,054 1,764,830 0.3430 14,882 3,119,842 0.4770 41,255 10,234,586 0.4031 26,422 5,884,423 0.4490 25,738 5,082,604 0.5064 2,885 718,130 0.4017 6,068 1,468,964 0.4131 30,702 5,394,964 0.5691 3,485 2,475,840 0.1408 12,515 3,651,373 0.3427 4,093 979,420 0.4179 3,923 360,335 1.0887 37,611 6,671,087 0.5638 5,163 646,863 0.7982 3,446 1,172,253 0.2940 1,353 417,360 0.3242 1,854 312,360 0.5935 5,127 1,143,166 0.4485 5,145 1,213,326 0.4240 8,299 1,909,998 0.4345 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13434 13437 13438 13439 13440 13441 13444 13446 13447 13448 13450 13451 13452 13453 13454 13455 13456 13459 13460 13463 13465 13485 13486 13487 13488 13490 13492 13494 13495 13496 13499 13510 13801 13802 13810 13812 DESCRIPTION Sun Lakes 02 Granite Reef Vista Park Sun City 34 Sun City 34A Sun City 35A Sun City 36 Velda Rose Estates East 2 Apache Wells Mobil P 1&2 Apache Cntry Club Est. 5 Apache Wells Mobile P 4B Casa Mia Desert Skies Dreamland Villa 16 Dreamland Villa 17 Linda Vista 2 Lucy T. Homesites 2 Luke Field Homes McAfee Mobile Manor Rancho Grande Tres Sun Lakes 03 Western Ranchettes 2 Sun City 32A Sun City 31A Sun City 39 Sun City 40 Brentwood Acres Desert Sands Golf & CC 8 Sun City 37 Sun City 42 Sun City 43 Sun City 28B Camelot Golf Club Est. 2 Scottsdale Estates 01 Scottsdale Highlands 1 Melville 1 Scottsdale Estates 04 6,815 914 4,584 22,606 21,205 6,949 1,731 15,309 4,400 1,100 6,639 1,760 11,246 3,430 3,352 1,393 10,465 1,762 7,773 10,674 3,391 22,511 30,631 12,158 7,090 1,731 4,620 19,239 10,777 23,590 3,482 3,756 5,050 1,973 6,288 14,328 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 7,402 1,012 4,614 22,895 21,538 7,012 1,910 16,863 4,854 1,214 7,313 1,941 12,407 3,783 3,691 3,258 10,618 1,948 8,130 11,569 3,582 22,748 30,869 12,285 7,210 1,910 5,097 19,382 10,509 23,772 3,509 4,144 5,577 2,182 6,939 15,861 151 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 8,511 1,762,760 0.4828 1,158 357,460 0.3240 5,132 1,176,676 0.4361 25,492 5,367,907 0.4749 24,386 4,649,296 0.5245 7,815 5,502,205 0.1420 2,118 531,076 0.3988 18,320 5,673,495 0.3229 5,445 2,674,736 0.2036 1,287 351,466 0.3662 8,367 1,881,254 0.4448 2,208 498,350 0.4431 13,882 3,390,586 0.4094 4,300 1,063,852 0.4042 3,980 1,055,686 0.3770 3,917 1,216,977 0.3219 11,787 1,505,578 0.7829 2,263 504,000 0.4490 9,973 3,303,666 0.3019 13,480 2,627,372 0.5131 4,206 1,394,310 0.3017 26,099 5,653,634 0.4616 34,623 6,028,243 0.5743 13,572 5,133,584 0.2644 8,110 3,076,140 0.2636 2,216 493,190 0.4493 6,113 2,091,568 0.2923 21,305 3,347,950 0.6364 11,244 2,063,970 0.5448 26,308 4,289,188 0.6134 3,978 662,596 0.6004 4,727 2,094,280 0.2257 6,350 2,921,557 0.2173 2,424 1,491,490 0.1625 8,224 3,283,546 0.2505 18,598 7,281,770 0.2554 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13813 13816 13817 13820 13821 13825 13827 13830 13836 13837 13838 13839 13840 13844 13848 13849 13850 13851 13853 13855 13859 13862 13863 13864 13865 13868 13869 13870 13872 13874 13875 13876 13879 13882 13884 13885 DESCRIPTION Scottsdale Highlands 2 Scottsdale Estates 02 Cavalier Hidden Village Scottsdale Estates 03 Mesa Country Club Park Scottsdale Estates 05 Trail West Dreamland Villa Scottsdale Cntry Acres Cox Heights 1 Cox Heights 2 Dreamland Villa 02 Esquire Villa 1 Scottsdale Estates 07 Scottsdale Estates 06 Scottsdale Estates 08 Scottsdale Estates 09 Cox Hghts 3 & Scot Est 12 Glenmar Dreamland Villa 03 Town & Country Scottsdale Country Place at Chandler Scottsdale Highlands 4 Trail West 2 Scottsdale Estates 16 J & O Frontier Place McCormick Estates 1 Dreamland Villa 04 Hallcraft 1 Hallcraft 2 Hallcraft 3 Apache Cntry Club Est. 1 Scottsdale Cntry Acres 2 Mereway Manor Cox Heights 7 2,198 5,699 6,864 1,758 7,705 3,518 11,680 1,756 1,940 4,173 3,954 11,013 2,830 5,736 12,075 12,351 7,959 5,057 10,085 2,159 5,535 2,332 6,925 1,333 2,195 6,581 2,776 1,674 2,429 29,257 17,661 12,300 8,129 6,840 5,932 1,973 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 2,425 6,305 7,310 1,940 8,484 3,398 12,905 1,940 2,140 4,607 4,361 12,156 3,121 6,304 13,336 13,443 8,729 5,577 11,154 2,382 6,108 2,575 7,704 1,510 2,425 7,517 3,060 1,849 2,683 32,250 19,205 13,579 8,967 7,553 6,304 2,182 152 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 2,765 1,373,780 0.2013 7,244 3,427,138 0.2114 8,236 4,098,793 0.2009 2,302 2,662,420 0.0865 9,983 5,576,046 0.1790 2,856 1,238,710 0.2306 15,083 7,972,670 0.1892 2,182 1,180,450 0.1848 2,381 519,836 0.4580 5,201 3,102,854 0.1676 5,058 2,491,625 0.2030 13,964 5,417,648 0.2578 3,529 2,013,741 0.1752 7,347 1,860,762 0.3948 15,333 6,889,222 0.2226 15,726 7,798,137 0.2017 9,980 5,228,140 0.1909 6,535 2,811,848 0.2324 12,959 6,899,880 0.1878 2,678 781,360 0.3427 7,200 1,458,318 0.4937 2,939 1,466,572 0.2004 8,979 3,226,630 0.2783 1,782 945,970 0.1884 2,807 1,526,770 0.1839 8,856 3,235,258 0.2737 3,649 1,825,319 0.1999 2,265 565,086 0.4008 3,006 740,060 0.4062 37,047 17,556,690 0.2110 22,039 10,477,358 0.2103 15,443 14,628,702 0.1056 10,293 3,777,370 0.2725 8,479 4,506,570 0.1881 6,591 3,676,858 0.1793 2,680 1,223,310 0.2191 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13886 13888 13890 13896 13901 13908 13909 13911 13912 13916 13917 13919 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 13931 13932 13933 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 DESCRIPTION Cox Heights 6 Cox Heights 4 Dreamland Villa 05 Scottsdale Highlands 5 Velda Rose Estates 1 Apache Cntry Club Est. 3 Dreamland Villa 06 Velda Rose Estates 2 Velda Rose Estates 3 Sun City 06 Sun City 05 Dreamland Villa 07 Dreamland Villa 08 Velda Rose Cntry Club Add Sun City 06C Sun City 06D Sun City 06G Sun City 07 Sun City 08 Sun City 09 Velda Rose Estates 4 Dreamland Villa 09 Sun City 11 Sun City 12 Sun City 15 Sun City 17 Sun City 01 Velda Rose Gardens Dreamland Villa 10 Sun City 15B Sun City 18 & 18A Sun City 17A Sun City 17B & 17C Sun City 19 & 20 Dreamland Villa 11 Sun City 23 1,316 4,840 6,256 1,758 1,299 12,289 4,422 1,948 2,162 38,165 16,977 6,925 4,768 2,780 31,215 27,193 13,491 12,242 14,938 11,961 2,164 6,702 48,710 37,008 4,358 4,660 337,986 4,159 6,242 6,010 37,467 2,623 9,429 42,303 9,067 23,828 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 1,455 5,334 6,900 1,940 1,433 13,554 4,886 2,149 2,385 38,686 17,131 7,641 5,269 3,067 31,621 27,611 13,610 12,336 15,055 12,094 2,388 7,393 49,203 37,612 4,402 4,806 339,183 4,586 6,881 6,081 37,811 2,645 9,520 42,678 10,001 24,121 153 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 1,628 776,510 0.2097 6,074 3,144,116 0.1932 7,676 1,695,896 0.4526 2,446 859,780 0.2845 1,658 345,648 0.4797 15,453 5,597,112 0.2761 5,401 1,493,331 0.3617 2,358 414,282 0.5692 2,618 820,722 0.3190 44,508 7,530,072 0.5911 19,364 4,744,085 0.4082 8,730 2,059,874 0.4238 5,897 1,596,880 0.3693 3,602 445,630 0.8083 36,002 6,907,844 0.5212 31,287 5,244,090 0.5966 15,572 3,378,419 0.4609 14,267 2,689,707 0.5304 16,729 3,466,501 0.4826 13,568 2,253,245 0.6022 2,680 748,582 0.3580 8,237 1,963,468 0.4195 56,890 9,447,250 0.6022 44,275 7,315,343 0.6052 4,913 1,858,756 0.2643 5,625 662,330 0.8493 394,573 45,706,823 0.8633 5,153 676,279 0.7620 7,825 1,835,450 0.4263 6,978 1,744,938 0.3999 43,106 7,686,274 0.5608 2,916 590,766 0.4936 10,544 1,988,562 0.5302 47,603 9,087,493 0.5238 11,332 2,692,100 0.4209 27,693 3,809,990 0.7269 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUDGET DIST # 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13962 13964 13965 13966 13967 13968 13969 13970 13972 13973 13974 13978 13985 13986 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13999 23076 23137 23145 23176 23189 23254 23255 23324 DESCRIPTION Sun City 21 & 21A Dreamland Villa 12 Sun City 11A Sun City 15C Sun City 22 & 22A Apache Wells Mobile P 5 Velda Rose Estates East Sun City 14 Sun City 22B Sun City 25 Sun City 25A Sun City 27 Sun City 30 Sun City 16 Apache Wells Mobile P 3 Dreamland Villa 14 Apache Wells Mobile P 4 Apache Wells Mobile P 4A Sun City 24 Sun City 26 Sun City 26A Sun City 31 Suburban Ranchettes Sun City 24B Sun City 28 Sun City 32 Dreamland Villa 15 Sun City 24C Pinnacle Ranch at 83rd Ave Country Meadows 10 Litchfield Vista Views II Crystal Manor Anthem I Cloud Creek Ranch Citrus Point SCW Expansion 17 38,128 7,538 12,941 13,703 33,808 2,878 3,888 6,419 10,450 44,363 23,813 11,992 44,574 21,825 9,017 14,485 6,597 2,860 9,304 21,722 18,695 17,242 3,462 8,885 3,938 17,781 9,517 6,050 3,131 15,065 2,277 7,858 725,460 1,176 6,570 87,795 Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 38,412 8,311 13,041 13,924 34,065 3,172 4,289 6,482 10,571 44,727 24,000 12,169 44,917 22,098 9,948 15,979 7,278 3,155 9,381 21,999 18,836 17,357 3,820 8,979 3,975 17,888 10,500 6,087 3,164 15,247 2,301 8,656 721,383 1,278 6,769 88,866 154 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 TAX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATION RATE 42,505 7,172,842 0.5926 9,304 2,060,646 0.4515 15,467 1,877,874 0.8236 15,761 4,918,366 0.3205 38,627 5,222,261 0.7397 3,403 739,129 0.4604 4,580 754,876 0.6067 7,389 900,702 0.8204 11,510 4,080,239 0.2821 50,688 9,579,748 0.5291 26,631 4,991,407 0.5335 13,625 2,685,624 0.5073 50,806 8,536,524 0.5952 24,004 12,812,976 0.1873 11,092 3,767,023 0.2945 18,744 5,182,588 0.3617 7,957 3,324,220 0.2394 3,429 1,234,329 0.2778 10,565 3,246,773 0.3254 24,524 5,988,783 0.4095 21,004 3,145,124 0.6678 19,318 3,458,830 0.5585 4,397 2,141,580 0.2053 10,218 4,264,070 0.2396 4,477 1,214,160 0.3687 20,251 3,400,234 0.5956 11,850 3,091,336 0.3833 6,873 2,719,222 0.2528 3,644 1,796,210 0.2029 18,687 4,391,220 0.4256 2,598 2,009,220 0.1293 10,474 1,762,770 0.5942 763,733 170,004,891 0.4492 1,524 936,270 0.1628 8,042 4,836,736 0.1663 98,203 25,988,171 0.3779 Maricopa County Annual Business Strategies FY 2009-10 Adopted Budget Improvement District Street Lighting Improvement District Levies (Continued) 2008-09 BUD GET DIST # 23344 23352 23353 23360 23375 23399 23452 23502 23567 23568 23572 23578 23579 23580 23595 23596 23594 23574 13435 23104 DESCRIPTION Dreaming Summit 1,2a,2b Sun Lakes Unit 41 Wigwam Creek N.Ph.1 Dreaming Summit 3 RUSSELL RANCH PH 1 Wigwam Creek South Litchfield Vist a Views IIIA&B Dos Rios Units 1&2 White T ank Foothills Capistrano North&South Wigwam Creek N 2&2b Cortessa Sub SLID Crossriver SanT an Vista Unit III Jackrabbit Estates Sundero Rancho Cabrillo Coldw ater Ranch Az Skies Mobile Est. W 2 Litchfield Vist a Views Estimated 2009-10 BUDGET 45,315 1,515 13,727 20,959 3,891 48,176 1,184 5,941 61,611 7,329 41,644 99,582 25,534 4,703 18,284 1,617 0 0 46,383 1,671 14,112 21,503 3,975 49,221 1,217 4,306 27,151 5,328 30,193 71,194 15,057 3,648 3,857 616 54,356 16,269 4,850,627 4,914,274 2,162 2,029 2,388 2,052 155 Estimated TAX YEAR Estimated DIRECT 2009 2009 T AX NET ASSESSED TAX LEVY VALUATI ON RAT E 55,528 24,825,046 0.2237 1,977 1,101,221 0.1795 15,612 7,016,316 0.2225 25,736 13,862,768 0.1856 4,683 4,811,470 0.0973 56,291 28,948,847 0.1944 1,429 3,080,640 0.0464 6,714 2,988,180 0.2247 56,368 7,993,837 0.7051 5,568 3,410,860 0.1632 36,262 12,650,416 0.2866 81,358 31,317,372 0.2598 17,569 21,049,280 0.0835 3,859 6,540,800 0.0590 7,930 3,213,641 0.2468 1,289 1,254,510 0.1027 54,356 7,814,762 0.6956 16,269 2,518,641 0.6459 5,496,336 2,319 2,152 2009 SQUARE F OOTAGE 272,754 1,351,641 0.8502 0.1592