TABLE OF CONTENTS EXISTING AND FUTURE CORRIDOR FEATURES 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2. PLANS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10 2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15 2.2.16 2.2.17 2.2.18 2.2.19 2.2.20 2.3 3. Background and Study Need ......................................................................................... 1 Project Study Area ......................................................................................................... 2 Study Purpose, Goals, and Objectives .......................................................................... 2 Project Schedule ............................................................................................................. 3 Plans, Studies, Reports, and Documentation ............................................................... 5 Summary of Findings and Recommendations from Review of Plans and Studies ... 5 Maricopa County Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan (September 2000) ................................ 5 MAG Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (July 2008) .. 5 MCDOT Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway (August 2008) . 6 MCDOT Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study (August 2009) ......................................................................................... 7 MCDOT Enhanced Parkway Study (August 2007) ........................................................... 8 Unofficial MAG Updated Buildout Traffic Projection (June 2009) ................................. 8 Town of Buckeye General Plan (2008) ............................................................................. 8 Maricopa County Transportation System Plan (February 2007) ..................................... 9 Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan: Street Classification Atlas (revised September 2004)............................................................................................................... 9 2010 State of the Systems Report (Fiscal Year 2010) ....................................................... 9 MCDOT Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study (May 2010) ................................ 10 Final MAG Regional Transportation Plan (July 2010) .................................................. 10 Draft Buckeye Transportation Master Plan (December 2009)....................................... 10 Draft ASLD White Tanks Conceptual Land Use Plan (2007)......................................... 11 Belmont Planning Documents (November 2007)............................................................ 11 Montiere Planning Documents (June 2008) ................................................................... 12 Anthem Sun Valley Conceptual Land Use Plan (March 2007)....................................... 12 Sun Valley Villages III and IV Planning Documents (July 2008) ................................... 12 Balterra Planning Documents (January 2007) ............................................................... 13 Mirielle Land Use Plan (October 2007) ......................................................................... 13 Summary of Programmed Roadway Improvements ................................................ 13 EXISTING AND FUTURE CORRIDOR FEATURES ............................................................................. 14 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 Jurisdictional Responsibilities ..................................................................................... 14 Land Ownership ........................................................................................................... 14 Zoning and Land Use ................................................................................................... 14 Existing Zoning and Land Use ........................................................................................ 14 Future Land Use ............................................................................................................. 15 Existing and Planned Developments........................................................................... 21 Existing Developments .................................................................................................... 21 Maricopa County Planned Developments ...................................................................... 21 Town of Buckeye Planned Developments ....................................................................... 22 State Trust Land Development Plans .............................................................................. 22 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features i Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXISTING AND FUTURE CORRIDOR FEATURES 3.4.5 3.4.6 3.5 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.2.1 3.5.2.2 3.5.2.3 3.5.2.4 3.6 3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.6.5 3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 3.6.9 3.6.10 3.7 3.8 4. Framework Study and Development Plan Coordination ................................................ 22 General Development Timeline ...................................................................................... 22 Transportation Network .............................................................................................. 26 Existing Transportation Network .................................................................................... 26 Future Transportation Network ...................................................................................... 26 Roadways ....................................................................................................................... 26 Interchanges ................................................................................................................... 27 Transit and Rail .............................................................................................................. 27 Funding the Future Transportation Network .................................................................. 27 Utilities and Facilities ................................................................................................... 31 Water ............................................................................................................................... 31 Sewer ............................................................................................................................... 31 Electric ............................................................................................................................ 31 Gas .................................................................................................................................. 31 Irrigation ......................................................................................................................... 31 Farming and Ranching ................................................................................................... 32 Tonopah Desert Recharge Project .................................................................................. 32 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station ......................................................................... 32 Solar Energy ................................................................................................................... 32 Sand and Gravel Operations........................................................................................... 32 Topography ................................................................................................................... 33 Recreational and Wildlife Areas ................................................................................. 33 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS .................................................. 37 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features ii Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXISTING AND FUTURE CORRIDOR FEATURES LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 - Jurisdictional Boundaries ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 3 - Land Ownership ...................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 4 - Zoning...................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 5 - Existing Land Use ................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 6 - Future Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 7 - Existing and Planned Developments ....................................................................................... 24 Figure 8 - Existing Transportation Network ............................................................................................ 29 Figure 9 - Future Transportation Network ............................................................................................... 30 Figure 10 - Existing Utilities and Facilities.............................................................................................. 34 Figure 11 - Topography ............................................................................................................................ 35 Figure 12 - Recreational and Wildlife Areas ............................................................................................ 36 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Major Project Milestones ........................................................................................................... 3 Table 2 - Summary of Existing and Planned Developments .................................................................... 25 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix TM1-01: Appendix TM1-02: Appendix TM1-03: Appendix TM1-04: Summary Table of Documents Reviewed MAG Framework Study Data Arizona Parkway Detailed Information Master Planned Communities Land Use and Circulation Plans 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features iii Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 1. INTRODUCTION Technical Memorandum 1 (TM 1), entitled Existing and Future Corridor Features, documents existing and future corridor features for the Northern Parkway: Tonopah Parkway to Turner Parkway and Tonopah Parkway: Northern Parkway to Interstate 10 Corridor Feasibility Study (hereafter referred to as the Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS, or “the project”). The purpose of TM 1 is to provide an overview of land uses, roadway conditions, drainage, access management, socioeconomic conditions, and environmental assessments in sufficient detail to provide a foundation for the identification of issues and constraints and preparation of maps showing feasible corridor alignments within the study area. Additional detailed information about the project is included in the following companion documents: Environmental Overview (TM 2), Conceptual Drainage Report (TM 3), Development and Evaluation of Candidate Alternative Alignments (TM 4), and Detailed Preferred Alignment (TM 5). 1.1 Background and Study Need In July 2008, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) completed the Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (known as the Hassayampa Framework Study), that recommended a comprehensive roadway network to meet the future traffic demands that result when the area west of the White Tank Mountains is completely developed (hereafter referred to as buildout travel demand). This long-range regional transportation network includes the “Arizona Parkway” as a new facility type to supplement more traditional roadway classifications in meeting projected travel demand. The Arizona Parkway utilizes a distinct intersection treatment that prohibits left turns at major cross-street intersections and controls intersection traffic movements with two-phased traffic signal control. Left-turn movements are made indirectly using directional left-turn crossovers in the median immediately downstream of cross-street intersections. The Hassayampa Framework Study demonstrated the need for both Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway. Although today’s land development and travel demands in the project study area do not warrant major new high capacity roadways in the near-term future, the buildout forecast for future land development and travel demands does warrant major new high capacity roadways in the long-term future. Plans are already underway to convert some of the vacant lands within the project study area to land uses that will generate future traffic. To preserve sufficient public right-of-way for the future Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway, the planning process needs to identify right-of-way requirements for buildout conditions. This study is the first step in the roadway development process and is meant to aid the governing bodies in defining and protecting a continuous future roadway corridor that can accommodate buildout traffic demands in the project study area. The project scope of work for this study includes the tasks necessary to prepare a corridor feasibility report that will provide the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT), the Town of Buckeye, area property owners, developers, and other stakeholders with a planning tool for future growth and development that will lead to the preservation of a 200-foot wide rightof-way corridor to accommodate the typical Arizona Parkway design. This will require significant coordination with various governing bodies, other public agencies, development interests, and the general public. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 1 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 1.2 Project Study Area The project study area includes the planned Northern Parkway, an east-west corridor centered on the Northern Avenue section line, from the planned Tonopah Parkway (411th Avenue alignment) to the planned Turner Parkway (267th Avenue alignment). The Northern Parkway corridor within the project study area is approximately 18 miles long and two miles wide. This section of Northern Parkway is referred to as the Northern Parkway Hassayampa section to distinguish it from other planned Northern Parkway sections east of the White Tank Mountains. The project study area also includes the planned Tonopah Parkway, a north-south corridor centered on the 411th Avenue section line, from Interstate 10 (I-10) to the planned Northern Parkway. The Tonopah Parkway corridor within the project study area is approximately 3.75 miles long and two miles wide. The project study area boundaries are shown in Figure 1. 1.3 Study Purpose, Goals, and Objectives The primary purposes of the Northern Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study are to: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Define and assess the project study area for potential opportunities and constraints for alternative corridor alignments; Develop and evaluate conceptual alternative corridor alignments within the study area; Recommend a preferred corridor alignment; and Define the characteristics of the preferred alignment in sufficient detail for right-of-way preservation. The study goals for the Northern Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study relate specifically to the proposed Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway in the context of the existing and future transportation network in the study area. Specific objectives are listed below for each study goal. Goal #1: Achieve roadway network continuity and connectivity ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Determine the preferred corridor alignment from a regional transportation corridor perspective; Protect and preserve right-of-way for the preferred corridor alignment to maintain its long-term viability; Provide future connectivity with primary and regional roadway facilities; and Provide crossings of alluvial fans, drainage washes, rivers, and canals. Goal #2: Enhance traffic flow (capacity) and safety ƒ ƒ ƒ Preserve functional integrity of the Arizona Parkway by recommending unique segmentspecific solutions to address identified opportunities or constraints; Identify areas that may require additional right-of-way or easements, especially at crossings with other parkways, alluvial fans, and utility corridors; and Enhance traffic operations while maintaining reasonable access for developments. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 2 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Goal #3: Preserve the environment ƒ ƒ ƒ Comply with governing environmental regulations for new roadway development; Minimize adverse impacts to the study area environment, including wildlife corridors and archeological sites; and Enhance important environmental features (e.g., habitat areas). Goal #4: Develop consensus-driven improvement alternatives ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 1.4 Work with the Technical Advisory Committee and key stakeholders in developing feasible alternatives; Develop cost-effective roadway improvement alternatives; Conduct public outreach to obtain input on alternatives and build consensus; and Ensure consistency between the study’s transportation actions and regional and local plans. Project Schedule The project schedule spans 14 months, from May 2010 through June 2011. The major milestones and their anticipated completion dates are shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Major Project Milestones Anticipated Completion Date Milestone Existing and Future Corridor Features Environmental Overview September 2010 Drainage Overview Alternatives Development and Evaluation January 2011 Preferred Alignment Drawings March 2011 Final Report May 2011 Throughout the duration of the project, five meetings are planned with a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting of representatives of state, county, and local jurisdictions within the project study area along with key project stakeholders. Three public meetings will be conducted during the project: following the assessment of existing and future conditions, following the development and evaluation of alternatives, and following the identification of the preferred alignment. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 3 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 1 - Project Study Area 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 4 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 2. PLANS AND STUDIES 2.1 Plans, Studies, Reports, and Documentation Relevant information on existing and future corridor features was obtained from available studies, reports, and other documents. The reports and studies that were obtained and reviewed as part of the Northern Parkway (Hassayampa Section) Corridor Feasibility Study are listed in Appendix TM1-01. 2.2 Summary of Findings and Recommendations from Review of Plans and Studies This section documents the findings and recommendations from existing studies and reports that are pertinent to the general existing and future corridor features of the Northern Parkway study area. Detailed documents discussing environmental and drainage issues and features are addressed in TM 2 and TM 3, respectively. 2.2.1 Maricopa County Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan (September 2000) The Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan for 2020 was developed by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department and adopted in 2000. The plan includes information on land use, transportation, environmental issues, and economic development within the study area between 411th Avenue and the Hassayampa River. Pertinent information from this plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ 379th Avenue is shown as a Core Arterial between I-10 and Glendale Avenue; Daily traffic volume data is provided for the following roadway segments: ƒ 335th Avenue north of Indian School Road (181 vehicles per day); and ƒ 387th Avenue north of Indian School Road (142 vehicles per day). ƒ 335th Avenue has a future functional classification of Rural Collector through the study area. Both 411th and 387th Avenues south of Glendale Avenue have future functional classifications of Rural Collector and Rural Local, respectively; and Several large lot subdivisions are shown within the study area, including Belmont, Belmont Ranches, Silver Star Ranch, Coyote Ridge, West Valley Ranch II, and Ironwood Trails Ranch. ƒ 2.2.2 MAG Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (July 2008) The MAG Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study is a longrange transportation planning study conducted by MAG and finalized in 2008. This study established a conceptual network of freeways, parkways, and arterial roadways within its 1,400 square mile study area to provide access and preserve I-10 as a transportation corridor. Opportunities for alternative transportation modes and potential traffic interchange locations along I-10 were also identified in this study. Pertinent information from this study for the project study area includes: ƒ Northern Parkway is proposed to originate at Tonopah Parkway and continue east through the study area boundary to Turner Parkway; 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 5 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 2.2.3 Tonopah Parkway is proposed to originate at the State Route (SR) 801 Parkway Extension and continue north to Northern Parkway; The proposed alignment of Northern Parkway dips to the south between 363rd Avenue and Hidden Waters Parkway; Other proposed parkways in the project study area are Camelback Parkway, Wintersburg Parkway, Hidden Waters Parkway, Sun Valley Parkway, and Turner Parkway; A new freeway known as the Hassayampa Freeway is envisioned to traverse the project study area at about the 355th Avenue alignment within the Belmont masterplanned community; The study identifies proposed parkway traffic interchanges at Northern Parkway’s intersection with the Hassayampa Freeway and Tonopah Parkway’s intersection with I-10; 411th Avenue has a current functional classification of Arterial Roadway through the study area. 395th Avenue is classified as an Arterial Roadway south of the Northern Avenue alignment. 387th Avenue is classified as an Arterial Roadway south of the Glendale Avenue alignment. I-10 is classified as a Rural Principal Interstate between 419th and 403rd Avenues along the study area boundary; A potential CANAMEX Corridor is shown through the study area along the Hassayampa Freeway alignment; Tonopah Parkway and the section of Northern Parkway west of the Hassayampa Freeway have been designated “low priority” for implementation. The section of Northern Parkway east of the Hassayampa Freeway has been designated “high priority” for implementation; The conceptual transit options include a freight-rail connector line running northsouth through the project study area near 387th Avenue and a high-capacity community transit line running north-south through the project study area east of Sun Valley Parkway; and Exhibits showing the conceptual transportation framework, the projected roadway geometry and intersection/interchange locations, and the unofficial daily traffic volume projections at buildout are provided in Appendix TM1-02. MCDOT Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway (August 2008) The Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway was prepared for MCDOT in August 2008. These recommendations detail the indirect left-turn parkway design concept to be used for Arizona Parkway roadway facilities such as Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway. Pertinent details regarding the design and layout of the Arizona Parkway include the following: ƒ ƒ 200-foot minimum right-of-way corridor recommended for both four- and six-lane sections. Additional right-of-way and/or easements may be needed for turn lanes, bus bays, drainage structures, drainage facilities, side slopes, utilities, and landscaping; Twelve-foot wide lanes are recommended, with four-foot wide inside paved shoulders and six-foot outside paved shoulders; 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 6 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 2.2.4 An additional eight-foot minimum width public utility easement is recommended on each side of the parkway; Median width varies based on the number of lanes needed; Minimum design speed for rolling terrain is 50 miles per hour (mph) in urban areas; WB-50 is the recommended design vehicle; U-turn directional crossovers are recommended to be restricted to a maximum of eight per mile; Left turns in any direction are prohibited at all intersections; Left turns from a side-street or driveway onto the parkway are prohibited; Left turns from the parkway to a side-street or driveway are discouraged due to conflicts between u-turns and right turns; Intersections (full median breaks) will preferably be restricted to one-mile spacing, with a minimum spacing of one-half mile, and are only recommended where intersecting with arterial or major collector streets; Recommended minimum driveway spacing is 165 feet for low-volume segments and 330 feet for high-volume segments. The typical driveway will be limited to right-in/right-out maneuvers; and Parkway typical cross-sections and the typical parkway at-grade intersection are provided in Appendix TM1-03. MCDOT Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study (August 2009) The Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study analyzed the parkway network established by regional transportation framework studies and identified parkway intersection treatments for the purpose of preserving future right-of-way needs. Pertinent information from the study for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Based on level of service thresholds for the buildout condition, both Tonopah Parkway and Northern Parkway are anticipated to ultimately need four through lanes throughout the project study area; Right-of-way preservation of 200 feet is adequate to meet the needs of at-grade parkway-to-parkway intersections of up to eight lanes on each approach; There are six parkway-to-parkway intersections within the project study area: ƒ Tonopah Parkway/Camelback Parkway; ƒ Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway (411th Avenue); ƒ Northern Parkway/Wintersburg Parkway (379th Avenue); ƒ Northern Parkway/ Hidden Waters Parkway (339th Avenue); ƒ Northern Parkway/Sun Valley Parkway; and ƒ Northern Parkway/Turner Parkway. All six project area parkway-to-parkway intersections are recommended to be atgrade intersections; and 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 7 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ 2.2.5 Intersection entering volumes for each of the six project area intersections are discussed in the study. Based upon these volumes, the following number of lanes approaching each intersection are recommended: ƒ Tonopah Parkway (4 lanes)/Camelback Parkway (4 lanes); ƒ Northern Parkway (4 lanes)/Tonopah Parkway (4 lanes); ƒ Northern Parkway (4 lanes)/Wintersburg Parkway (6 lanes); ƒ Northern Parkway (4 lanes)/ Hidden Waters Parkway (8 lanes); ƒ Northern Parkway (4 lanes)/Sun Valley Parkway (8 lanes); and ƒ Northern Parkway (4 lanes)/Turner Parkway (8 lanes). MCDOT Enhanced Parkway Study (August 2007) The Enhanced Parkway Study was prepared for MCDOT in 2007 and analyzed the indirect left-turn parkway corridor design. The study found the minimum required parkway-toparkway right-of-way width with dual right turn lanes to be approximately 225 feet, assuming the continuation of the full 60-foot median width through the intersection. 2.2.6 Unofficial MAG Updated Buildout Traffic Projection (June 2009) In June 2009, MAG developed updated unofficial buildout traffic projections associated with the network of facilities from the Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study. Pertinent information from the unofficial buildout traffic projections for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 2.2.7 Updated projected daily traffic volumes for Northern Parkway range from 6,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day. Project daily traffic volumes for Tonopah Parkway north of I-10 range from 9,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. The buildout traffic projections are unofficial and have not been adopted by the MAG Regional Council; The recommended lane configurations for Northern Parkway are four lanes from Tonopah Parkway to Sun Valley Parkway and six lanes from Sun Valley Parkway to Turner Parkway; The recommended lane configuration for Tonopah Parkway is four lanes from I-10 to Northern Parkway; and All proposed intersections with Northern Parkway are anticipated to be at-grade with the exception of the interchange with the Hassayampa Freeway. Town of Buckeye General Plan (2008) The Town of Buckeye 2007 General Plan Update, adopted in January 2008, outlines the Town of Buckeye’s framework and policies for managing the development of the land within its planning area. The General Plan includes land use and circulation elements. The Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study served as the framework for the circulation element of the General Plan. Pertinent information from this plan for the project study area includes: ƒ Land use within the project study area consists of very low density residential (0-1 dwelling units/acre [du/ac], low density residential (1.01-3 du/ac), medium density 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 8 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ ƒ 2.2.8 residential (3.01-6 du/ac), medium high density residential (6.01-10 du/ac), high density residential (10.01-15 du/ac), regional commercial, business park, and open space; Sun Valley Parkway, Turner Parkway, and Northern Parkway are classified as parkway facilities; and The approved Master Planned Communities as of October 2007 within the study area were Sun Valley South, Sun Valley, and Montiere. Maricopa County Transportation System Plan (February 2007) The Maricopa County Transportation System Plan was last updated in February 2007. The 2007 update outlines Maricopa County’s plans for its transportation system through 2026. The existing and future conditions of the roadways owned and maintained by MCDOT were analyzed. Capacity needs for County roadways were also analyzed based on forecasted travel demands for 2015 and 2026. Pertinent information from the plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 2.2.9 Sun Valley Parkway is classified as a Principal Arterial and a Case 1 County Island Roadway through the study area; 355th Avenue/Wickenburg Road is classified as a Minor Arterial; Sun Valley Parkway is designated as a bike route per the MAG Regional Bikeway Plan; The Maricopa County Regional Trails Plan includes one Priority 3 and two Priority 4 trails through the study area; and Northern Avenue between 307th Avenue and 355th Avenue is shown as having capacity needs in the year 2026. Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan: Street Classification Atlas (revised September 2004) The Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan: Street Classification Atlas designates the future functional classifications for arterial and collector roadway facilities in the County Road Inventory System. The Atlas was last revised in September 2004 to include the most recent street function classification information as of April 2004. Pertinent information from the Atlas for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ 411th Avenue is classified as a Minor Arterial from I-10 to Bethany Home Road; 355th Avenue/Wickenburg Road is classified as a Principal Arterial and has a scenic overlay through the study area. The scenic overlay includes a scenic easement of 50 feet on each side of the right-of-way; and Sun Valley Parkway is classified as an Enhanced Arterial and a Road of Regional Significance (RRS) through the study area. As an RRS, the desired right-of-way width is 140 feet. 2.2.10 2010 State of the Systems Report (Fiscal Year 2010) MCDOT’s State of the Systems Report for fiscal year 2010 documents the physical and operational condition of its roadways. The section of the Systems Report titled Low Volume 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 9 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Road Management System inventoried and evaluated the unpaved roads owned, operated, or maintained by the County. This report shows the segment of 411th Avenue between Camelback Road and Bethany Home Road on the list of Low Volume Roads with an average daily traffic volume of more than 149 vehicles per day, meaning it has been recommended for further scoping for paving by MCDOT. 2.2.11 MCDOT Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study (May 2010) The Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study was completed by MCDOT in May 2010. This study identified a 200-foot wide corridor for a future parkway between I-10 and SR 74 just west of the White Tank Mountains. The recommended alignment for Turner Parkway within the project study area follows the alignment proposed previously in MAG’s Hassayampa Framework Study. 2.2.12 Final MAG Regional Transportation Plan (July 2010) The Regional Transportation Plan 2010 Update is MAG’s guiding regional transportation planning document for all major modes of transportation through fiscal year 2031. The Plan identifies future transportation facilities including planned roadway, freight, and transit system improvements. Pertinent information from this plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ The 2030 Arterial Street System Total Through Lane plan shows Northern Avenue as having six lanes between Sun Valley Parkway and 339th Avenue and four lanes between 339th Avenue and 411th Avenue; and The Hassayampa Illustrative Corridors plan shows the following: ƒ Illustrative parkway traffic interchanges at I-10/Tonopah Parkway and Hassayampa Freeway/Northern Parkway; ƒ Illustrative freight rail connector west of Wintersburg Parkway through the study area; and ƒ Illustrative High Capacity Community Transit parallel and east of Sun Valley Parkway through the study area. 2.2.13 Draft Buckeye Transportation Master Plan (December 2009) A draft version of the Town of Buckeye’s Transportation Master Plan was made public in December 2009. The Transportation Master Plan uses the Town of Buckeye’s General Plan as its base and develops the circulation element in more detail, covering short-, intermediate-, and long-term transportation planning time periods. Pertinent information from the Plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ Goal 9 of the plan is to “preserve the Arizona Parkway System” by requiring all Community Master Plans and General Plan Amendments for property across a proposed parkway route to be required to preserve parkway right-of-way; Sun Valley Parkway, Turner Parkway, and Northern Parkway are classified as parkway facilities; The portion of Northern Parkway within the Buckeye Master Planning Area (MPA) is between 331st Avenue and Turner Parkway; 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 10 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ ƒ An Intra-Buckeye Express mass transit route is shown crossing Northern Parkway at the 307th Avenue and Turner Parkway alignments. A light rail/bus rapid transit route is shown along Sun Valley Parkway through the study area; and Five local multimodal trails are shown crossing the study area within the Buckeye MPA. 2.2.14 Draft ASLD White Tanks Conceptual Land Use Plan (2007) In 2007, the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) assigned land use designations to the State Trust land parcels within the Buckeye MPA for future auction. The land use designations were coordinated with the master-planned communities in the area and existing private land owners. These land use plans have not been finalized and the ASLD study is currently on hold. Pertinent information from this draft land use plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ Designated land uses within the study area include low and medium density residential, commercial, open space, and employment; and The ASLD White Tanks Conceptual Land Use Plan showing the land use designations is provided in Appendix TM1-04. 2.2.15 Belmont Planning Documents (November 2007) Belmont is a proposed master-planned development in Maricopa County generally bounded by 331st Avenue on the east, the Cactus Road alignment on the north, 371st Avenue on the west, and I-10 on the south. Belmont is being developed by LKY Development. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approved the Development Master Plan for Belmont in June 2008. Pertinent information from the Belmont planning documents for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ The conceptual path and trail master plan shows an east-west Major Connector trail along the Northern Avenue alignment. The proposed Central Arizona Project (CAP) Loop, Interior Loop, and Village Loop also cross through the study area; The phasing plan for Belmont shows the development having 24 development phases. The following phases are within the project study area: 6, 8-14, and 19-21. Phases 11, 13, and 14 are currently on State Trust land; A park-and-ride trail head is proposed southeast of the Hassayampa Freeway and Northern Avenue intersection; The roadway sections presented include a parkway section with a 200-foot right-ofway; Hidden Waters Parkway and Northern Parkway are shown as parkway facilities; A new freeway known as the Hassayampa Freeway is envisioned to traverse the project study area at about the 355th Avenue alignment; The land uses designated within the study area include: large lot residential, small lot residential, medium density residential, high density residential, mixed use, regional retail center, community retail center, neighborhood retail center, educational, recreational open space, and dedicated open space; and The Belmont Land Use Plan, Conceptual Path and Trail Master Plan, and roadway sections are provided in Appendix TM1-04. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 11 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 2.2.16 Montiere Planning Documents (June 2008) Montiere is a proposed mixed-use development within the Buckeye MPA. Montiere is being developed by the Wespac Development Corporation. The development is generally bounded by Glendale Avenue to the south, Johnson Road to the east, Northern Avenue to the north, and the 315th Avenue alignment to the west. The Town of Buckeye has approved a preliminary plat for the development. Pertinent information from the Montiere planning documents for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ The Montiere Preliminary Plat shows a 200-foot wide strip of land along the Northern Avenue alignment for future additional right-of-way; The Regional Circulation plan shows Northern Avenue as a proposed principal arterial (6 lanes with raised median); The land uses designated within the study area include: single family residential, mixed use, school, park, utility infrastructure, water supply, open space, and commercial/employment; and The Montiere Land Use Plan, Regional Circulation Plan, and Preliminary Plat are provided in Appendix TM1-04. 2.2.17 Anthem Sun Valley Conceptual Land Use Plan (March 2007) Anthem Sun Valley is a proposed master-planned development within the Buckeye MPA. Anthem Sun Valley is being developed by Pulte Homes. The development is generally bounded by the White Tank Mountains to the east, Missouri Avenue to the south, Sun Valley Parkway to the west, and Northern Avenue to the north. The Town of Buckeye has approved several preliminary plats for the development. This development is part of the Sun Valley South Community Master Plan, last amended in January 2006. Pertinent information from the Anthem Sun Valley planning documents for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ The land uses designated within the study area include: residential, clubhouse/community centers, commercial, school, public services, worship, and park; and The Anthem Sun Valley Conceptual Land Use Plan is provided in Appendix TM104. The Regional Roadway Network exhibit and Master Street and Circulation Plan for Sun Valley South (which includes the Anthem Sun Valley development) are also provided in Appendix TM1-04. 2.2.18 Sun Valley Villages III and IV Planning Documents (July 2008) Sun Valley Villages III and IV is a master-planned mixed-use development within the Buckeye MPA. The development is generally bounded by Northern Avenue to the south, the 287th Avenue alignment to the east, Greenway Road to the north, and the 307th Avenue alignment to the west. The Sun Valley Villages III and IV Community Master Plan was approved by the Town of Buckeye in April 2009. Pertinent information from the Sun Valley Villages III and IV land use plan for the project study area includes: ƒ The land uses designated within the study area include: low, medium, and high density residential, commercial, business park, park, elementary school, major wash, and power line easement; and 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 12 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ The Sun Valley Villages III and IV Land Use Plan and Master Street and Circulation Plan are provided in Appendix TM1-04. 2.2.19 Balterra Planning Documents (January 2007) Balterra is a master-planned development in Maricopa County. The development is bounded by Indian School Road to the south, 395th Avenue to the east, Camelback Road to the north, and 415th Avenue to the west. The Development Master Plan for the development was approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in January 2007. Pertinent information from the Balterra planning documents for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ ƒ The land uses designated within the study area include: small lot residential, medium density residential, mixed use, recreational open space, dedicated open space, office employment center, neighborhood retail center, commercial retail center, mixed use employment center, business park, educational, and public facilities; and 411th Avenue is shown as a six-lane principal arterial with 65 feet of dedicated halfstreet right-of-way; and The Balterra Proposed Land Use and Street Circulation Maps are provided in Appendix TM1-04. 2.2.20 Mirielle Land Use Plan (October 2007) Mirielle is a master-planned development within the Buckeye MPA. The development is generally bounded by Bethany Home Road to the south, Sun Valley Parkway to the east, Northern Avenue to the north, and Johnson Road/307th Avenue to the west. The Mirielle development is part of the Sun Valley South Community Master Plan, last amended in January 2006. A preliminary plat for Mirielle was approved by the Town of Buckeye in March 2008. This plat was not extended and has since expired. Pertinent information from the Mirielle land use plan for the project study area includes: ƒ ƒ 2.3 The land uses designated within the study area include: commercial, high density residential, mixed use, medium density residential, parks, wash, school, water campus, and utility; and The Mirielle land use plan is provided in Appendix TM1-04. Summary of Programmed Roadway Improvements There are currently no programmed roadway improvements contained in the Capital Improvement Programs, Transportation Improvement Programs, and Regional Transportation Plans that pertain to the project study area. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 13 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 3. EXISTING AND FUTURE CORRIDOR FEATURES This section summarizes the information gathered from the documents cited in the previous section into existing and future corridor feature categories. Exhibits are provided, where appropriate, to graphically display the existing and future corridor features that should be considered in determining feasible alignments for Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway. 3.1 Jurisdictional Responsibilities The Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway corridors are located within Maricopa County. Maricopa County has jurisdiction over the majority of the land and roadways within the project study area. The Town of Buckeye has jurisdiction over the land within its town limits adjacent to and within the project study area. Portions of the project study area currently under Maricopa County jurisdiction are also within the Buckeye Municipal Planning Area. Jurisdictional boundaries are illustrated in Figure 2, as per the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data provided by the Public Works Department of Maricopa County in May 2009. Tonopah, an unincorporated community, lies within the western portion of the project study area. While the most recent attempt to incorporate in 2009 failed, any future attempt that does succeed would result in an additional governing body with jurisdiction over land within the study area. 3.2 Land Ownership The project study area contains a mix of both public and private lands. Over 81 percent of the land in the project study area is privately owned. Public land owners in the study area include ASLD, which owns 16 percent of the project study area, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which owns 2 percent of the project study area. Land ownership in the study area is shown in Figure 3, as per the GIS data provided by the Public Works Department of Maricopa County in May 2009. 3.3 Zoning and Land Use 3.3.1 Existing Zoning and Land Use Figure 4 shows the existing zoning and parcel boundaries in the project study area as of June 2009. Zoning data for the unincorporated portions of the project study area was obtained from the Maricopa County Assessor’s Office website (http://www.maricopa.gov/Assessor/GIS/map.html) while the zoning data for the portion of the project study area in Buckeye was obtained from the Town’s General Plan. The Maricopa County zoning designations shown in Figure 4 include: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Intermediate Commercial (C-2); General Commercial (C-3); Planned Shopping Center (C-S); Single Family Residential with 6,000 square feet per dwelling unit (R1-6); Multiple-Family Residential with 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit (R-4); Multiple-Family Residential with 1,000 square feet per dwelling unit (R-5); 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 14 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 ƒ ƒ Rural with 190,000 square feet per dwelling unit (RU-190); and Rural with one acre per dwelling unit (RU-43). The only Town of Buckeye zoning designation in the project study area is Planned Community (PC). The project study area is primarily zoned for rural agricultural activity and low density residential uses, with some commercial and higher density residential zoning near Tonopah and I-10. Figure 5 shows the existing land uses in the study area per the GIS data provided by Public Works of Maricopa County in May 2009. The predominant existing land use within the project study area is vacant land. There are a few clusters of residential and agriculture use located between 379th Avenue and 419th Avenue within the study area. The only public land use is a service yard owned by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). There are a few commercial land uses located directly south and east of the study area near the intersection of I-10 and 411th Avenue. 3.3.2 Future Land Use Figure 6 shows the anticipated future buildout land uses within the project study area per the MAG general plan GIS data provided by Public Works of Maricopa County in May 2009. This exhibit indicates that the existing vacant land within the study area is anticipated to be converted to primarily residential land use at buildout. Most of the study area land west of 371st Avenue is planned to have single family low density residential uses, while the land to the east of 371st Avenue is planned to have higher density residential uses. There are also large patches of retail, office, and industrial land uses at major intersections throughout the study area east of 371st Avenue. These future land use patterns follow the land use plans for the large master planned communities in this region. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 15 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 2 - Jurisdictional Boundaries 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 16 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 3 - Land Ownership 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 17 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 4 - Zoning 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 18 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 5 - Existing Land Use 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 19 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 6 - Future Land Use 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 20 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 3.4 Existing and Planned Developments Figure 7 shows the existing and active planned developments around and within the project study area. While virtually all of the land within the project study area is currently open desert with unpaved roadways and natural drainage features, a large percentage of the parcels have been subdivided or are part of a development master plan with associated entitlements. Table 2 provides a summary of the existing and planned developments within the project study area. 3.4.1 Existing Developments Beginning at the west end of the study area from 419th Avenue to an extension of the Wintersburg Road/379th Avenue alignment, there are several existing low density residential subdivisions, including Coyote Ridge, Silver Star Ranch, Ironwood Trails, West Valley Ranch Phase 2, and West Phoenix Estates 4 and 6. Through these subdivisions, a combination of roadway easements and dedicated right-of-way with various half-street cross-sections exists along the Northern Avenue and 411th Avenue alignments: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Coyote Ridge Plat – Dedicated a 110-foot easement along Northern Avenue; Silver Star Ranch Plat – Dedicated a 35-foot roadway and utility easement along Northern Avenue, and also acknowledges it as a 130-foot designated county road; Ironwood Trails Ranch Plat – Dedicated 33 feet of right-of-way along Northern Avenue; West Valley Ranch Phase 2 Plat – Dedicated a 33-foot roadway and utility easement along Northern Avenue; Belmont Ranches Map of Dedication – Dedicated a 33-foot roadway and utility easement along Northern Avenue; and West Phoenix Estates Unit 4 Plat – Dedicated a 55-foot segment and 40-foot segment of right-of-way along 411th Avenue. The majority of 411th Avenue up to Bethany Home Road has 80 feet of full-street right-ofway. There are also a couple of segments of 55-foot and 60-foot half-street right-of-way along 411th Avenue. Most of the existing right-of-way along 411th Avenue is not associated with plats or large area subdivisions of land. 3.4.2 Maricopa County Planned Developments West of the Hassayampa River, the land within the project study area is under the jurisdiction of Maricopa County. The planned developments within this region submit to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors for approval of their development master plans. The Board of Supervisors has approved two developments within the project study area: Balterra and Belmont. ƒ ƒ Balterra is located along 411th Avenue between I-10 and Camelback Road. The approved Balterra Development Master Plan shows 411th Avenue as a major arterial with a 65-foot half-street right-of-way; and Belmont is located along a seven-mile segment of the Northern Avenue alignment between the Wintersburg Road/379th Avenue alignment and the Hassayampa River. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approved the latest version of the Belmont plan on June 18, 2008, with stipulations requiring right-of-way dedications 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 21 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 and financial participation in constructing the Northern Parkway within a 200-foot footprint. The master plan envisions parkway-to-parkway and parkway-to-freeway interchanges where needed, but does not envision incorporating the indirect leftturn concept at the Northern Parkway arterial street intersections. 3.4.3 Town of Buckeye Planned Developments East of the Hassayampa River, the project study area lies within the Buckeye MPA where there are four approved master-planned communities: Montiere, Mirielle, Anthem Sun Valley, and Sun Valley Villages III and IV. ƒ ƒ ƒ 3.4.4 Montiere is along the south side of the Northern Avenue alignment. The approved preliminary plat for Montiere currently shows 200 feet of land for future right-ofway dedication along the Northern Avenue alignment which would provide the necessary width for the future parkway; Mirielle and Anthem Sun Valley are on the south side of the Northern Avenue alignment and are subdivisions of the approved Sun Valley South Community Master Plan (CMP). Their respective land use plans do not show the Northern Avenue alignment as a parkway. The Sun Valley South CMP was approved in 2006, prior to the parkway framework’s acceptance; and Sun Valley Villages III and IV is located on the north side of the Northern Avenue alignment. The Master Street and Circulation Plan for the development shows Northern Avenue as a parkway with 200 feet of right-of-way. State Trust Land Development Plans ASLD has developed a draft conceptual land use plan for the State Trust land located east of the Hassayampa River in the vicinity of the White Tank Mountains. Per this plan, the land use along the Northern Avenue alignment within the study area has been designated to coordinate with the master-planned communities in the area. It is anticipated that this land will be auctioned off for development at some point in the future. Minimizing the number of remnant parcels caused by new roadway alignments is important to ASLD to preserve the value of the State Trust land. 3.4.5 Framework Study and Development Plan Coordination MAG took into account the previously mentioned master-planned developments when the proposed parkway alignments were developed for the Hassayampa Framework Study. The Northern Parkway alignment dip to the south between 355th Avenue and 339th Avenue is a result of the Belmont development’s plans and approved layout. 3.4.6 General Development Timeline The progression of these master-planned developments, and development in general, within the project study area has slowed significantly in recent years. At the time the Hassayampa Framework Study was conducted, the Phoenix metropolitan area was experiencing significant population growth over a period of several years. In the past few years, however, the rate of growth has slowed due to the economic downturn, as evidenced by the fact there are few development or rezoning requests currently being processed by Maricopa County 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 22 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 and the Town of Buckeye for land within the project study area. The rate of growth within the project study area is expected to increase following a significant economic recovery, but the development timeframes for when buildout will be reached will likely be extended. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 23 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 7 - Existing and Planned Developments 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 24 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Table 2 - Summary of Existing and Planned Developments Jurisdiction Development Name Area [acres] Planned Units/ Existing Lots 1,110 4,458 780 228 Approval Date ROW Stipulations/Existing ROW Assumed Functional Classification of Roadway Length of Segment along Study Area Center Line Timeframe for Final Plat/Plan of Development th Balterra West Phoenix Estates 4 December 2006 130' full street, 65' half street (411 Ave) Major Arterial 1/2 mile 4 years March 1970 55' half street (411th Ave) Major Arterial 1/3 mile Plat Recorded th September 1970 75' half street (419 Ave); 40' half street (415th Ave) Major Arterial; Major Collector N/A Plat Recorded 8 March 1993 33' half street easement (Northern Ave); th 55’ half street easement (411 Ave) Minor Arterial; Major Arterial 3 miles Plat Recorded 160 4 April 1996 33' half street easement (Northern Ave) Minor Arterial 1/2 mile Plat Recorded 260 15 October 1996 33' half street (Northern Ave) Minor Arterial 1/8 mile Plat Recorded Silver Star Ranch 2,000 54 February 1996 35' half street easement/ 130' Designated County Road (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 1-1/2 miles Plat Recorded Coyote Ridge 1,150 31 June 1997 110' reserved easement (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 1/2 mile Plat Recorded Belmont 24,800 48,000 June 2008 200' full street (Northern Ave) Parkway 7 miles 4 years Montiere 780 1,584 June 2006 200' full street (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 1-1/6 miles N/A Mirielle 1,733 8,419 March 2008 65' half street (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 2 miles N/A Sun Valley Villages III and IV 6,099 16,117 April 2007 100' half street (Northern Ave) Parkway 2-1/2 miles N/A Anthem Sun Valley 4,445 12,420 October 2006 65' half street (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 2-1/2 miles N/A 929 0 January 2006 65' half street (Northern Ave) Major Arterial 1/2 mile N/A West Phoenix Estates 6 780 251 3,220 West Valley Ranch Phase 2 Ironwood Trails Ranch Belmont Ranches Maricopa County Town of Buckeye Sun Valley South (Employment Center) 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 25 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 3.5 Transportation Network 3.5.1 Existing Transportation Network Within the study area, Northern Avenue is an unpaved road not owned or maintained by Maricopa County. 411th Avenue is currently a paved two-lane road between I-10 and Camelback Road that is owned and maintained by Maricopa County. Other paved north-south existing roadways in the project study area are Sun Valley Parkway and Wickenburg Road/355th Avenue, along with portions of 387th Avenue and 411th Avenue. The only paved east-west roadways in the project study area are I-10 and Indian School Road, both of which are in the southwest portion of the project study area. Northern Avenue exists as an unpaved roadway along the study corridor centerline between 419th Avenue and 387th Avenue. It is neither owned nor maintained by MCDOT. East of 387th Avenue, east-west travel through the corridor is generally an option only for all-terrain vehicles. MCDOT utilizes the Road Management System (RMS) tool to analyze the physical attributes of roadways as well as the condition of roadway pavement and ride quality. One of the data items included in the RMS is the pavement conditions rating (PCR). The 2010 MCDOT State of the System report shows the PCR ratings for portions of several of the major roads within the project study area. 411th Avenue is rated to be in ‘good’ condition between I-10 and Camelback Road and ‘excellent’ condition between Camelback Road and Bethany Home Road. The only other paved roads with PCR ratings within the study area are Sun Valley Parkway and Wickenburg Road/355th Avenue, which are both rated to be in ‘excellent’ condition. Existing 2008 daily traffic count volumes for the existing transportation network were taken from the Traffic Counts web pages of MCDOT and ADOT. The daily traffic count volumes are shown in Figure 8. 3.5.2 Future Transportation Network The transportation network in the project study area is anticipated to change dramatically in the future buildout condition. According to the Hassayampa Framework Study and the MAG 2010 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), most existing roadways are expected to change to a higher functional classification and be upgraded as the existing transportation network is transformed into an interconnected multimodal network of parkways, freeways, arterials, railroad lines, and transit routes, as shown in Figure 9. 3.5.2.1 Roadways The project study area is anticipated to ultimately contain two east-west parkways (all of Northern Parkway and the western edge of Camelback Parkway) and five north-south parkways (Tonopah, Wintersburg, Hidden Waters, Sun Valley, and Turner Parkways) in the buildout condition. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 26 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 A new freeway known as the Hassayampa Freeway is envisioned to traverse the project study area at about the 355th Avenue alignment within the Belmont masterplanned community. Arterial roadways are projected to typically be spaced about one mile apart from other high-capacity roadways (i.e., freeways, parkways, and arterials), with the spacing being larger in the vicinity of the Hassayampa River and Jackrabbit Wash. 3.5.2.2 Interchanges A critical component of the envisioned future transportation network is the point where the high-capacity roadways will cross each other. It is anticipated that there will be two freeway-to-parkway interchanges and six parkway-to-parkway interchanges within the project study area. The two freeway-to-parkway interchanges are proposed where Tonopah Parkway would cross I-10 at the southwestern border of the project study area and where Northern Parkway would cross the Hassayampa Freeway within the Belmont master-planned community. ADOT is currently working on freeway-to-parkway interchange templates that will further define the design standards and right-ofway requirements associated with freeway-to-parkway interchanges. Five parkway-to-parkway interchanges are proposed along Northern Parkway where it crosses the Tonopah, Wintersburg, Hidden Waters, Sun Valley, and Turner Parkways. A sixth parkway-to-parkway interchange is proposed where Tonopah Parkway crosses Camelback Parkway. Each parkway-to-parkway interchange will have its own associated design standards and right-of-way requirements, as detailed further in the MCDOT Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operations Analysis and Design Concepts Study. 3.5.2.3 Transit and Rail An Illustrative High Capacity Community Transit line is proposed in the RTP that would cross through the study area east of and parallel to Sun Valley Parkway. An Illustrative Freight Rail Connector is proposed in the RTP that would run north from the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant and cross through the study area directly west of, and parallel to, the proposed Wintersburg Parkway. 3.5.2.4 Funding the Future Transportation Network The proposed master-planned developments throughout the study area will play a major role in the future layout, construction timing, and financing of the future transportation network within the project study area. There are significant financing requirements stipulated in some of the approved development master plans. For example, the Belmont Development Master Plan stipulates a regional transportation infrastructure contribution for each residential dwelling unit. In addition, the Belmont developer is stipulated to perform an archaeological survey and work with the Arizona Game and Fish Department to develop plans to mitigate potential wildlife impacts. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 27 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 For areas not addressed with this level of master plan stipulations, design and construction of the proposed future transportation network will likely require a combination of existing public and private funding sources, and perhaps new funding sources. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 28 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 8 - Existing Transportation Network 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 29 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 9 - Future Transportation Network 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 30 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 3.6 Utilities and Facilities Figure 10 depicts the existing and planned major utilities and facilities within the project study area. 3.6.1 Water The developed properties within the project study area have individual wells to supply water. The western portion of the study area is within the anticipated service area for the Water Utilities of Greater Tonopah, but there are currently no facilities within the study area. 3.6.2 Sewer There are no known existing or planned municipal or county sewer facilities in the project study area. Existing developed properties utilize septic tanks. 3.6.3 Electric Per the Tonopah Area Plan and maps provided by Arizona Public Service (APS), several major power transmission corridors run though the project study area. Three Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) transmission lines – two 500kV and a 345kV – diagonally cross through the project study area directly west of Sun Valley Parkway. Two APS 500kV transmission lines also cross through the project study area along the west side of Sun Valley Parkway. There are no known additional power transmission lines planned by APS or WAPA within the project study area. 3.6.4 Gas There is an existing 36-inch natural gas pipeline owned by Transwestern that crosses through the project study area parallel to the existing APS 500kV transmission lines that run along Sun Valley Parkway. There are no known additional transmission gas pipelines planned by Transwestern within the project study area. 3.6.5 Irrigation A branch of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal named the Tonopah Canal crosses through the project study area diagonally north of Northern Avenue and along the east side of 383rd Avenue south of Northern Avenue. This concrete-lined canal is owned by the Bureau of Reclamation and operated by the Tonopah Irrigation District (TID). The TID boundary is generally located along Northern Avenue to the north, 379th Avenue to the east, Salome Highway to the south, and 435th Avenue to the west. Within this district boundary, the TID uses the canal to distribute CAP water to farms. The canal right-of-way 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 31 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 width transitions from 100 feet north of the Northern Avenue alignment to 75 feet south of the Northern Avenue alignment. 3.6.6 Farming and Ranching There are two dairy farms within the project study area: Belmont Dairy along 387th Avenue and Tonopah Dairy along 395th Avenue. ASLD has granted grazing special land permits on the three State Trust land parcels west of the Hassayampa River. There are no grazing leases or permits on the four State Trust land parcels east of the Hassayampa River. 3.6.7 Tonopah Desert Recharge Project The 542-acre Tonopah Desert Recharge Project, owned and operated by the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, is located approximately 1.5 miles west of the project study area. The ground uplift caused by this recharge facility affects land as far east as 355th Avenue/Wickenburg Road, but the magnitude of the ground uplift is relatively small (zero to three centimeters between 2006 and 2010). Uplift or subsidence in the area affected by the recharge project should be monitored in future design phases, especially if the Tonopah Desert Recharge Project modifies or stops the groundwater recharge. 3.6.8 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) is located approximately eight miles south of the project study area. A portion of 355th Avenue/Wickenburg Road is a planned evacuation route for PVNGS. A small portion of the study area near the I-10 interchange at 411th Avenue is within the ten-mile radius Emergency Planning Zone and the entire study area is contained within the fifty-mile radius Ingestion Pathway Zone for PVNGS. 3.6.9 Solar Energy There are currently no large-scale solar energy projects within the project study area. There is, however, a 9,950-acre solar energy project in the planning stages west of the project study area. This project is called the Palo Verde Project and it is included in the BLM’s list of pending solar projects on file. Environmental studies have not begun for this project. 3.6.10 Sand and Gravel Operations There are currently no sand and gravel operations permits within the project study area. It should be noted, however, that the land within the project study area along the Hassayampa River has been determined to have potential for future sand and gravel operations by ASLD’s Mineral Assessment Asset Management GIS project. A proposed bridge where Northern Parkway crosses the Hassayampa River could impact future sand and gravel operations as there are currently restrictions on these operations within one mile upstream and two miles downstream of a bridge. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 32 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 3.7 Topography Figure 11 illustrates the topography of the region through slope analysis around and within the project study area. Most of the project study area is fairly flat, particularly west of the Hassayampa River. The Hassayampa River, which crosses the project study area roughly between the 315th Avenue and 333rd Avenue alignments, has resulted in significant topographic changes within the project study area immediately west and east of the river. There is an increase in elevation and topographic relief towards the eastern boundary of the project study area. There is a difference of 643 feet between the low elevation of 1,100 feet in the southwestern portion of the project study area and the high elevation of 1,743 in the northeastern portion of the project study area. Most of the project study area has an elevation between 1,100 and 1,400 feet. There are significant topographical changes (i.e., slopes greater than five percent) just to the east and north of the project study area. To the east of the project study area are the White Tank Mountains and to the north are the Belmont Mountains and Flatiron Mountain. 3.8 Recreational and Wildlife Areas Several recreational and wildlife areas exist within or adjacent to the project study area. Figure 12 shows the various potential wildlife linkage zones, wildlife habitat areas, and regional parks within or near the project study area. There are two potential wildlife linkage zones within the study area along both the western and eastern ends of the project area. There is also an existing recognized Sonoran Desert Tortoise habitat along the northern and eastern edges of the study area. The White Tank Mountain Regional Park is located northeast of the project area. According to the Maricopa County Trails Plan, there are three planned trails crossing through the project study area. These proposed trails are low-priority regional and conceptual corridors that traverse the project study area along the Hassayampa River, the Old Camp Wash, and the power line corridor which runs diagonally across the eastern portion of the study area. The Belmont master-planned development also has numerous trails planned within its boundary, including a trail along the Northern Avenue alignment. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 33 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 10 - Existing Utilities and Facilities 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 34 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 11 - Topography 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 35 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Figure 12 - Recreational and Wildlife Areas 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 36 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 4. SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS Based on the existing and future corridor features discussed previously, the following potential opportunities/constraints have been identified (generally listed in order from west to east and south to north in the project study area) that should be considered in determining feasible alignments for Northern Parkway and Tonopah Parkway: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Existing I-10/411th Avenue interchange; Potential wildlife linkage zone west of 411th Avenue; Segments of existing right-of-way and roadway easements along 411th Avenue and Northern Avenue; Existing vacancy of land; Relatively flat topography west of the Hassayampa River; Tonopah Canal; Planned rail line west of the proposed Wintersburg Parkway; Planned trails through the study area; Existing communities, such as West Phoenix Estates 4, West Valley Ranch Phase 2, Ironwood Trails Ranch, Silver Star Ranch, Coyote Ridge; ASLD State Trust land; Belmont master-planned community; Planned freeways, parkways, and arterials through the study area; Topography changes near Hassayampa River; Hassayampa River; Potential sand and gravel operations along the Hassayampa River; Montiere master-planned community; Mirielle master-planned community; Anthem Sun Valley master-planned community; Sun Valley Villages III and IV master-planned community; Potential wildlife linkage zone on eastern end of study area; Existing Sun Valley Parkway and utility corridor alignment; Planned community transit route along Sun Valley Parkway; High voltage power corridors running diagonally through the eastern end of study area; Recommended Turner Parkway alignment; and Topography changes near White Tank Mountains. 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features 37 Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 APPENDIX TM1-01 SUMMARY TABLE OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA Title No. 1 2010 Update - Regional Tranportation Plan 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A Compilation of Geomorphic and Hydrologic Reports on the Jackrabiit Wash Flood, October 2000, Maricopa County, Arizona Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary ITEM Description Author Discipline Source Jul 2010 MAG Jun 2002 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage ADWR Jul 2009 ADWR pdf BML Water ADWR Mar 2009 ADWR CD BML Water Coe & Van Loo Consultants Oct 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller May 2003 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller Apr 2003 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller Dec 2003 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage transportation improvement planning info MAG 3 reports: Landsat flood detection, geomorphic assessment, and flood reconstruction. Primarily looks at Jackrabbit Wash upstream of confluence AZGS with Star Wash (north of NP study area) so is not esp. pertinent. Active Land Subsidence Areas in Arizona Based map showing active subsidence areas on ADWR InSAR Data Shapefiles: recharge points, industry points, ADWR GIS Data CD-ROM depth to water and water level elev (Phoenix AMA only), irrigation polygons, hardrock Approximate Flood Hazard Assessment for White determines flood hazard delineation for alluvial Tank Fans Alluvial Fan Site 37A (East of Sun fan. Fan 37 is just south of NP study area and Valley Parkway) Town of Buckeye, Arizona ends at Sun Valley Pkwy Technical Data Notebook Approximate Zone A Floodplain Delineation 2 volumes in TDN. North of NP study area so not Study of Watershed "OO" Coyote Wash and esp. pertinent. Tributaries 6 volumes in TDN TDN, report in vol 1 and exhibits in Approximate Zone A Floodplain Delineation vol 4-6. only 2 tributaries at southern end of this Study of Watershed "OO" Hassayampa River study impact the NP (Inset 46B and 46C in Tributaries & Lower Jackrabbit Wash Tributaries maps). Approximate Zone A Floodplain Delineation Zone A delineation study, not esp. pertinent to NP Study of Watershed "OO" Upper Jackrabbit because is upstream of study area Wash and Tributaries TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By pdf BCP Date Transportation 9 Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange AZ parkway intersection ROW information Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study Wilson & Company Aug 2009 MCDOT PDF MLG Transportation 10 Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange report with R/W requirements, traffic volumes, Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study intersection layouts Wilson & Company Aug 2009 MCDOT pdf MLG Transportation 11 Arizona Parkway Projected Travel Volumes and Laneage/Interchange Needs Jun 2009 MAG pdf/GIS on CD MLG Transportation 12 As-Built Report Buckeye Site 1 Drain Maricopa County, Arizona Mar 1981 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Projected build-out traffic volumes for Hassayampa and Hidden Valley Framework Wilson & Company areas with laneage and interchange needs on parkways; GIS shapefiles as-built inspection report for 4.5 miles of 17.5' deep embankment drain trench for Buckeye FRS ERTEC, Inc. #1, includes plans at end of document KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls 1 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. ITEM Title 13 Buckeye Area Drainage Master Plan Recommended Design Report 14 Buckeye Area Flood Delineation Study Hydrology Report 15 16 Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary Buckeye/Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Study Volume I: Master Document Summary Buckeye/Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Study Volume V-A1: Area 3 Hydrology Report Description describes various plan components to manage runoff. Study area is south of I-10 so not esp. pertinent to NP. FEMA report to estimate 100-yr peak flows for floodplain delineation. Study area is south of I-10 so not esp. pertinent to NP. overview of the project and the four areas included. References the other eight volumes description of hydrologic methods and results for Area 3 maps showing groundwater conditions in the Hassayampa Sub-basin of the Phoenix Active Management Area maps showing groundwater conditions in the Phoenix Active Management Area maps showing groundwater conditions in the Phoenix Active Management Area AZ parkway ROW requirements, intersection layout Geologic Map of the Buckeye NW 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona Geologic Map of the Wintersburg 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona 1:100,000 digital map of OFR93-18, in jpg and shp formats 17 D.W.R. Hydrologic Map Series Report No. 10 18 D.W.R. Hydrologic Map Series Report No. 27 19 D.W.R. Hydrologic Map Series Report No. 35 20 Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway 21 DGM-37 22 DGM-47 23 DI-05: Geologic Data for the Phoenix South 30' x 60' Quadrangle 24 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Allocation brief history of Tonopah Irrigation District and its of Water Supply and Long-Term Contract CAP water allocation Execution Central Arizona Project Appendix L 25 Drainage Design Report for Sun Valley Parkway Drainage Enhancement 26 documentation for interceptor channel collector ditch, wagner wash outlet protection, detention basin ditch/inlets, and baffle block design. Not esp. pertinent since all of these drainage improvements are north of the NP study area. written in response to damage from August 1988 storm event: discusses storm frequency analysis, design approach, channel bank protection, Drainage Enhancements for Sun Valley Parkway Wagner Wash outlet protection, drop structure damage, roadside channel enhancements, interceptor channel damage. KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls Author TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Discipline Date Source Dibble Engineering Jun 2009 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage McLaughlin Kmetty Engineers Jul 1992 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage PBS&J Jun 2006 FCDMC pdf AOM Drainage PBS&J Jan 2006 FCDMC pdf AOM Drainage ADWR 1982 ADWR pdf BML Water ADWR 1992 ADWR pdf BML Water ADWR Nov 2002Feb 2003 ADWR pdf BML Water DMJM Harris; AECOM Aug 2008 MCDOT PDF MLG Transportation AZGS Nov 2004 AZGS CD BML Geology AZGS Mar 2006 AZGS CD BML Geology AZGS Mar 2006 AZGS CD BML Geology USBR Jun 2000 USBR pdf BML Water Collar, Williams & White Engineering Dec 1988 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Collar, Williams & White Engineering Oct 1988 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage 2 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary ITEM Title Description Author Date Source TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Discipline 27 Drainage Report Sun Valley Parkway Phase II (Station 410+00 - 1023+95) quantifies runoff that crosses roadway and sizes Collar, Williams & culverts/channels. Phase II starts at Northern Ave alignment and extends north/east to Phase I. White Engineering Drainage area map at end of document. Apr 1987 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage 28 Drainage Report Sun Valley Parkway Phase III (291st Avenue from I-10 to Northern Avenue) quantifies runoff that crosses roadway and sizes culverts/channels. Pdf is missing drainage area map. Apr 1987 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage 29 Earth Fissure Map of Maricopa County, Arizona mapping of earth fissures 30 Enhanced Parkway Study Final Report 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 AZ parkway intersection ROW information preliminary assessment for retrofitting Buckeye Executive Summary Existing Flood Control FRS 1,2,3 (and other projects outside NP study Facilities Landscape Aesthetics and Multiple-Use area) for enhanced recreational/aesthetic Opportunities Assessment opportunities FIS No. 04013CV001A: description of general Flood Insurance Study Maricopa County, Arizona flooding issues in county, effective discharges, and Incorporated Area and flood profiles FY 2011-2015 2011 2015 Transportation Improvement programmed transportation improvements Program Geologic Map of the Flatiron Mountain 7.5’ DGM-46. mapped surface and bedrock units with Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona descriptions DGM-38. mapped surface and bedrock units, Geologic Map of the Wagner Wash Well 7.5’ also includes separate report document with Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona descriptions OFR 91-10: outlines methods used to map Geologic Mapping of Flood Hazards in Arizona: alluvial surfaces of different ages, then converted An Example From the White Tank Mountains to five flood-hazards zones. Includes four Area, Maricopa County 24"x36" plates. GIS and Volume Data GIS Data, buildout traffic volumes 38 GIS shapefiles from FCDMC 39 GWSI Database CD-ROM 40 GWSI Hydrograph Site ID 333146112560801 41 Hassayampa Basin Gravity Survey drainage, floodplain, railroad, wilderness, jurisdictions, community features, subdivisions, road features, 10-ft contours, aerials Collar, Williams & White Engineering AZGS Dec 2009 AZGS pdf BML Geology Morrison Maierle Aug 2007 MCDOT PDF MLG Transportation Carter Burgess Feb 2001 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage FEMA Sep 2005 KHA pdf BML Drainage MAG Jul 2010 MAG pdf BCP Transportation AZGS Mar 2006 AZGS pdf BML Geology AZGS Nov 2004 AZGS pdf BML Geology AZGS Mar 1992 AZGS hardcopy BML Geology Wilson & Company Jun 2009 MAG CD BCP Transportation FCDMC May 2009 FCDMC GIS on CD ES ALL Jul 2009 ADWR CD BML Water Access database of Groundwater Site Inventory: well ownership, historic water levels, construction ADWR data, etc. historical groundwater levels at 411th Ave and ADWR Bethany Home Rd shows points for depth to bedrock study ADWR KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls Dec 2009 ADWR pdf BML Water unknown ADWR pdf BML Water 3 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. 42 43 44 ITEM Title FEMA report to estimate 100-yr peak flows for floodplain delineation (reach is Wickenburg to Gila River) Hydrologic Study Report for Luke Wash Zone AE Contains only the hydrology documentation Floodplain Delineation Study (Section 4) of a larger study Hydrologic Analysis of the Hassayampa River in Maricopa County, Arizona Hydrologic/Hydraulic Design Analysis of Proposed Sun Valley Parkway Crossing of the Buckeye Watershed Structure 46 Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study Final Report and Executive Summary 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Description Author Jackrabbit Wash Floodplain Delineation Study Contract Amendment Number One: Hydrologic Model Sensitivity Analysis Jackrabbit Wash Floodplain Delineation Study Technical Data Notebook Hydrology Lower Hassayampa Watercourse Master Plan Phase I Luke Wash Watershed FDS Luke Wash Watershed Zone AE Floodplain Delineation Study Technical Data Notebook Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Street Classification Atlas Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Maricopa County Transportation System Plan Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance National Engineering Handbook Part 630 Hydrology Open-File Report 91-8 summary of the analysis of the proposed improved interchange on the Buckeye FRS #1. south of the NP study area so not esp. pertinent. TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Discipline Date Source Aug 1997 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Cella Barr Associates May 1988 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Wood, Patel & Associates Sep 2008 KHA pdf BML Drainage Collar, Williams & White Engineering Aug 1987 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage DMJM Harris; AECOM Jul 2008 bqaz.org/ pdf/GIS on MAG CD MLG Transportation Burgess & Niple Jul 1991 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Burgess & Niple May 1991 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Hassayampa River Planning and Design Analysis investigation of bank erosion next to CAP (and CH2MHill Report concept designs) -- not esp. pertinent to NP study 45 47 Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary overview, existing and future conditions, evaluation framework, travel demand forecasting, alternatives, implementation, funding; GIS shapefiles supplement to FDS analyzing accuracy/sensitivity of HEC-1 parameters. Also includes FCDMC comments comments. 2 books. FEMA report to estimate 100-yr peak flows for floodplain delineation seven technical reports intended to develop guidance for managing the river floodplain map of Floodplain Delineation Study boundary 4 volumes. Report, survey field notes, supporting documentation, and exhibits. FCDMC Apr 2006 FCDMC pdf AOM Drainage FCDMC Wood, Patel & Associates unknown FCDMC jpg BML Drainage Mar 2009 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage drainage guidelines MC Jan 2007 KHA pdf BML Drainage road classifications MC Sep 2004 MC pdf BCP Transportation description of plans for regional trail facilities road conditions, road planning info zoning ordinance zoning ordinance descriptions and codes MC MC MC Maricopa County Aug 2004 Feb 2007 Jun 2010 Jul 2009 MC MC MC MC pdf pdf pdf pdf BCP BCP BCP MLG Planning Transportation Planning Planning Chapter 7 Hydrologic Soil Groups NRCS May 2007 NRCS pdf BML Drainage Surficial Geology Around the White Tank Mountains, Central Arizona AZGS Nov 1991 KHA hardcopy BML Geology KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls 4 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary ITEM Title Description Author 60 Palo Verde Watershed Zone A Floodplain Delineation Study Technical Data Notebook 61 Phase I Report Project Calculations Hydrologic Analysis Buckeye Floodwater Retarding Structures #1, #2, and #3 62 Phoenix Active Management Area 63 Preliminary Geologic Maps of the Eastern Big Horn and Belmont Mountains, West-Central Arizona 64 Preliminary Investigation Report for Tonopah Watershed Maricopa County, Arizona 65 Preliminary Master Drainage Report for Sun Valley Maricopa County, Arizona 66 Proposed Development: Belmont 67 Proposed Development: Douglas Ranch 7 volumes. Hydrology, hydraulics, and floodplain delineation for approx. 400 miles of washes; Area Entellus C and Area D cover western portion of NP study area. precipitation calcs, PMP storm distributions, HEC1 input parameters, capacity data and reservoir Dames & Moore routing documentation maps shows major infrastructure and ADWR grandfathered water rights OFR 85-14. mapped surface and bedrock units with descriptions. Mapped area is north of NP AZGS project area. high level overview of various problems and proposed drainage projects, contains useful USDA SCS exhibits at end of documents very preliminary (no specifics) drainage report for 28,000 ac master planned community north and Collar, Williams & west of White Tank Mtns, has useful exhibits at White Engineering end of document proposed site map showing development Hadley Design boundaries and primary features, vicinity map Group showing other developments in area conceptual land use and framework plans Greey Pickett 68 Proposed Development: Mirielle conceptual land use plan 69 Proposed Development: Montiere 70 Proposed Development: Sun Valley South 71 72 73 74 Proposed Development: Sun Valley Villages III and IV Roadway Design Manual Solicitation/Specifications Main Canal and Laterals Tonopah Irrigation District, Arizona Central Arizona Project Statewide Rail Framework Study proposed site map showing development boundaries and uses conceptual land use plan with boundaries; KHA traffic impact analysis TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Discipline Date Source May 2003 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Jan 1990 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Sep 2003 ADWR pdf BML Water Nov 1985 AZGS hardcopy BML Geology Jul 1974 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage May 1986 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Nov 2007 MC pdf MLG Planning Jul 2008 MC Communi ties Southwes t pdf MLG Planning pdf BCP Planning WRG Design Oct 2007 David Evans May 2006 MC pdf MLG Planning CMX; KHA May 2006 MC; KHA pdf MLG Planning conceptual land use plan with boundaries Carter Burgess Jul 2008 MC pdf MLG Planning guidelines for standard roadway design Vol 2 of 2 (DRAWINGS) -- contains construction plans and soil boring for major canal that runs along 383rd Ave alignment 2050 Vision plan with maps MCDOT Apr 2004 KHA pdf BML Transportation Franzoy Corey Engineering Feb 1985 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage BQAZ Aug 2009 BQAZ pdf MLG Transportation KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls 5 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary ITEM Title Description Author TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Discipline Date Source Aug 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Dec 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Logan Simpson Design Jan 2007 FCDMC pdf BML Landscape Architecture JE Fuller Aug 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller Sep 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage provides updated hydrology for Area 4 of ADMS -downstream end of this area impacts the NP JE Fuller study. describes federal, state, and local ordinances that guide development, also includes inventory of EDAW proposed developments 75 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Area 4 Hydrology Technical Data Notebook 76 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Planning and Regulatory Coordination 77 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Scenery Multiuse Data Collection and Analysis 78 outlines preliminary alternatives for flood Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Step 1 protection alternatives. Hassayampa and White Alternatives Formulation and Preliminary Analysis Tank Wash sub-areas apply to NP study. 79 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Step 2 Proposed Alternatives Report 80 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Step 3 Recommended Alternative Report JE Fuller Dec 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage 81 Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Technical delineates 100-year floodplain for alluvial fan Data Notebook Approximate Zone A Floodplain near NP alignment. Also includes lengthy section JE Fuller on geomorphic methods. Delineation Study of White Tank Fan 6 Nov 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller Nov 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage JE Fuller Sep 2006 FCDMC pdf BML Geology Parsons Dec 2006 MC pdf BCP Transportation/ Planning FCDMC unknown FCDMC pdf BML Drainage 82 83 84 85 assessed scenic/recreational resources and provides alternatives evaluation 7 volumes. Vol 1 provides overview of ADMP process, and Volumes 4 and 5 contain the specific alternatives for the NP study area. 7 volumes. Vol 1 provides overview of ADMP process, and Volumes 4 and 5 contain the specific alternatives for the NP study area area. delineates 100-year floodplain for alluvial fans Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Technical between White Tank Mtns and Hassayampa Data Notebook Approximate Zone A Floodplain River. Also includes lengthy section on Delineation Study of White Tank Fans 4 & 5 geomorphic methods. Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Plan Technical Data Notebook: Approximate Zone A Floodplain compilation of AZGS geologic reports/maps, Delineation Study of White Tank Piedmont NRCS soil surveys, and sediment yield analysis Appendix G Sun Valley Parkway Access Control and Corridor study for reference on right of way and utilities Improvement Study contains various documentation regarding the damage from the Aug 1988 storm, Greiner reviews of CWW drainage reports, variance from Sun Valley Parkway Correspondence standard drainage design criteria -- valuable lessons on building a roadway in this alluvial fan area KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls 6 of 7 Summary Table of Documents Reviewed - Kimley-Horn and Associates AZGS = Arizona Geological Survey ADOT = Arizona Department of Transportation ADWR = Arizona Department of Water Resources FCDMC = Flood Control District of Maricopa County FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency KHA = Kimley-Horn and Associates MAG = Maricopa Associated Governments MC - Maricopa County MCDOT - Maricopa County Department of Transportation LIBRARY KHA No. ITEM Title 86 Sun Valley Parkway North FIS Hydrology Report 87 SW Maricopa County Linkage Designs and Conservation Priorities 88 The Use of Multi-spectral Remote Sensing Imagery For Geomorphic Mapping and Determination of Flood Prone Areas on Piedmonts in Maricopa County, AZ: An Example From a Portion of the Jackrabbit Wash Watershed 89 Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan 90 Town of Buckeye Draft Transportation Master Plan 91 Town of Buckeye General Plan Figures 92 Town of Buckeye GIS Data 93 94 Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study Data Collection Summary Description Author land use, zoning, transportation classifications, environmental information exhibits showing planned road, trail, and transit networks land use, circulation, environmental conditions, growth area land use use, floodway transitional areas areas, master planned communities land use and zoning GIS data Mar 1991 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage Jul 2009 KHA pdf/GIS in email MLG Environmental JE Fuller Feb 2002 FCDMC pdf BML Drainage MC Sep 2000 MC pdf MLG Transportation/ Planning Town of Buckeye Dec 2009 Buckeye pdf BCP Planning Partners for Strategic Action May 2008 Buckeye pdf MLG Planning Town of Buckeye Aug 2010 Buckeye GIS in email BCP Planning May 2009 Buckeye pdf MLG Planning Mar 2010 ADWR pdf BML Water Town of Buckeye Zoning and Annexation History zoning and annexation history Town of Buckeye Figures Uplift in the Vicinity of the Tonopah Recharge map showing ground uplift from 2006 to 2010 due ADWR to recharge plume Facility KHA Project No. 091337127 K:\PHX_Systems\091337127 - MCDOT Northern Parkway\Data Collection\Data Collection Summary.xls Discipline Source hydrologic analysis to determine peak 100-yr flows to study area north of White Tank Mtns -A-N West, Inc. note that this is northeast of NP study area so will not be reviewed further comment letter from AGFD, wildlife linkage Arizona Game and designs, conservation priorities, environmental Fish Department features and constraints report explores using LANDSAT imagery to determine floodprone areas -- not esp. pertinent to NP study, only uses NE portion of Jackrabbit Wash watershed as an illustrative example TRACKING Format/ Collected File Type By Date 7 of 7 APPENDIX TM1-02 MAG FRAMEWORK STUDY DATA 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 93 TO 89 Wickenburg 60 60 TOYOTA TECHNICAL TESTING CENTER 211th Ave Lake Lake Pleasant Pleas ant F T6N R2W rwy Festival Ranch TO 187th Ave 17 Surprise Grand Vista BNSF Commercial Facility Witman Ranch Wittman T5N R3W T5N R4W Quintero Black Mountain Rd 163rd Ave Whispering Ranch 74 T6N R3W G ing r ton and No Av rt h e n ue er n (U Sa Circle City nta S-6 Fe 0 Ra ) Broadstone ilro Mountain ad Ranch Wild Rose Pkwy T5N R5W Turner Pkwy T6N R4W Box Was h ine Rd re M Vult u T5N R7W T5N R6W B Morristown url T6N R5W T6N R6W Hidden Waters Pkwy T6N R7W Carefree Hwy alignment Dove Valley Rd Marisol Ranch T5N R2W Dixileta Dr Tierra Sierra Rico Norte Peakview Estates Asante North Patton Rd/Dynamite Rd Desert Oasis VOLVO LUKE AFB PROVING Rio Rancho AUXILIARY GROUNDS Estates Whonnack FIELD White Tanks Frwy T3N R4W Sun Valley South Valle del Sol T2N R5W T2N R4W Elianto Elianto Tartesso West Buckeye FRS #2 Tartesso Was Luke PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Hidden Waters Pkwy Winters Wash Tonopah Pkwy T1N R5W Cipriani RID C Southern Ave T1S R6W n Pa Unio R cific Ar ntia Pote tension Ex anal p ar k Copper Falls 85 am Lower Buckeye Rd Broadway Rd Southern Ave 801 King Liberty Park Baseline Rd Ranch Beloat Rd Liberty Canal Buckeye Gila 801 Hassayampa Yuma Rd Canyon Trails III MC-85 Palo Verde Benessere Johnson Valley Van Buren St Trails Henry Park Riata West Rive Estrella Mountain Ranch 303 gton Canal lin Has say am Buckeye Hills Recreation Area Elliot Rd r T1S R3W T1S R4W Camelback Rd Thomas Rd White Tanks FRS #4 Canyon Southwest Ranch Sonoran Buckeye Vista Ranch Bethany Home Rd Indian School Rd T1N R2W Monte Verde Santana Arlington T1S R5W ad ailro West Silver Rock h wy T1S R7W l Pk Westwind Glendale Ave McDowell Rd INTERSTATE 10 Watson T1N R3W Estates T1N R4W Buckeye Municipal Airport Cactus Rd Abel Palm Valley Blue Horizons Ranch Sundance Wintersburg T1N R6W LUKE AIR FORCE BASE Zanjero Trails FRS #3 Tartesso Buck eye F RS # 1 Waddell Rd Northern Ave White Tank Foothills Sienna Buckeye Hills McDowell Pkwy Greenway Rd Olive Ave Woolf Crossing Dove Trails Jackrabbit Estates Litchfield Sedella Farms Verrado Deer Valley Rd Peoria Ave Arroyo Arroyo Seco Verde Tartesso West Yuma Pkwy Greer Ranch White Tanks Russell T2N R2W Ranch FRS #3 T2N R3W Surprise Prasada Sycamore Farms Cortessa Maracay White Tanks Tartesso Desert Creek 303 Rainbow Ranch T1S R2W Estrella Mountain Regional Park Narramore Rd Ray Rd Cotton Lane Hassayampa Ranch Legacy Park Cactus Lane Ranch Pinnacle Peak Rd Bell Rd Mountain Northwest Vista Ranch Ranch Sarah Ann Ranch Jackrabbit Trail Detailed tunnel feasibility study to be conducted Montiere Sierra Negra Ranch T1N R7W T3N R2W T3N R3W Happy Valley Rd Union Hills Dr Surprise Bell West Ranch Ranch Westside (ASLD) White Tanks (ASLD) Belmont Wintersburg Pkwy 10 White Tank Mountain Regional Park Sun City Grand Sierra Montana Beardsley Canal Phillips Wash Sierra Negra Ranch Tonopah Verde Tonopah Trillium West Jomax Rd Beardsley Rd Beardsley Arizona Traditions Surprise Farms Sun Valley Camelback RdT2N R6W T2N R7W Sun Valley Pkwy T3N R5W CAP Canal Northern Ave Bell Pointe 1, 2 Sun Valley River h as tW T3N R6W w Fr Austin Sun Valley Pkwy Hass ayam pa bi ab T3N R7W pa am ay s as H Pinnacle Peak Country Estates Northwest Ranch Regional Landfill Bell Pkwy y Asante T4N R2W Surprise Foothills Festival Ranch Del Webb Star Was h r ck Ja Hummingbird Springs Wilderness Area Fox Trail T4N R3W T4N R4W 60 Estates D Vistoso T4N R5W T4N R6W T4N R7W Buena Vista Ranch Spurlock Ranch Tierra Verde ic ke n Douglas Ranch M cM Wash Turner Pkwy Coyot e Lone Mountain Rd Sun Haven Ranch Walden Ranch Williams Field Rd Pecos Rd Germann Rd Rainbow Valley Queen Creek Rd Fr pa w Ocotillo Rd McRae Properties y Chandler Heights Rd Knorr Farms Riggs Rd Seibert Insignia Verma Ladera Wyatt John Rainbow Valley Lewis Prison Hunt Rd Patterson Rd Micca John Farms 85 Sonoran Desert National Monument TO 8 10 TO Woods Rd Estrella Pkwy Cotton Ln Sarival Ave Citrus Rd Jackrabbit Trl Perryville Rd Dean Rd Verrado Way/ Airport Rd Rainbow Rd Watson Rd Miller Rd Apache Rd Rooks Rd Turner Rd Oglesby Rd Wilson Rd Palo Verde Rd Bruner Rd Johnson Rd 315th Ave 323rd Ave 331st Ave 347th Ave 339th Ave 355th Ave 363rd Ave 371st Ave 387th Ave 379th Ave 395th Ave 403rd Ave 411th Ave 427th Ave 419th Ave 435th Ave 451st Ave 443rd Ave 459th Ave 8 TRANSPORTATION FRAMEWORK RECOMMENDATION Legend Study Area Boundary Railroads Roads Rivers/Washes Canals Unincorporated Communities Township/Range Noise Contours Topography (100' contours) State Land Development Planning Areas Master Plan Buckeye National Monument Glendale Wilderness Area Proposed Service Traffic Interchanges Proposed Parkway Land Ownership Traffic Interchanges BLM Proposed System Interchanges State Land Planned Developments Regional Parks BLM Raptor Protection Military Zone Bureau of Reclamation Goodyear Proposed Roadway Network Improvements to Existing Freeways Future Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Freeways (Prop 400) Surprise New Freeway Proposals New Parkway Proposals New Parkway Alternatives Future Major Arterial Network Notes While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, the Maricopa Association of Governments makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to its accuracy and expressly disclaims liability for the accuracy thereof. Arterial river crossings are conceptual to demonstrate the number of crossing needed to support development. Final locations and number will be determined in engineering and water resource studies. General alignments for new freeway, highway, arterial, and bridge facilities will be determined following the completion of appropriate design and environmental studies. Locations of proposed roadway facilities south of the study area are subject to refinement in the I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Roadway Framework Study to be completed in 2008, and roadways north to be planned in the New River Roadway Framework Study, schedule to be determined. Locations of proposed freeway interchanges and the use of parallel roads connecting to freeways are preliminary and subject to review and approval of the FHWA and ADOT. Olive Avenue traffic interchange on SR-303L to be a half-diamond. 0 5 7-1 Miles C 2007, All Rights Reserved Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study February 22, 2008 Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange - Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study Figure 2.3 Recommended Number of Lanes for Buildout Parkway Network In Association With Page 2-6 APPENDIX TM1-03 ARIZONA PARKWAY DETAILED INFORMATION 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 Source: Design Guildeline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway - MCDOT - August 2008 Source: Design Guildeline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway - MCDOT - August 2008 Source: Design Guildeline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway - MCDOT - August 2008 APPENDIX TM1-04 MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES LAND USE AND CIRCULATION PLANS 091337127, 2010-004, TT005 Technical Memorandum 1 Existing and Future Corridor Features Maricopa County Department of Transportation Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway CFS November 2010 24 Wa g n 20 19 21 er Wa 23 22 MDR EMP 24 19 21 20 WC MHDR MDR COMM MHDR COMM COMM WC MDR WC 3N 6W 28 Det Basin WC 26 30 25 29 28 27 30 29 yot e Co 35 34 36 31 35 02 03 OS VLR 33 LDR COMM COMM WC LDR NORTH E RN COMM LDR 04 05 03 OS LD R 02 06 01 05 11 12 07 08 10 09 11 07 12 08 ip s Wa s h 10 13 14 15 29 21 29 28 COMM 36 OS 31 OS VLR LDR 27 28 26 30 25 LDR 02 LDR OS 10 OS OS OS 01 LD R 34 WC 12 OS MD R 35 03 04 VLR 17 18 16 14 15 13 17 18 16 22 20 19 24 SURPRISE 16 21 22 27 25 26 3N 1W 30 28 29 27 02 31 36 3N 3W OS 01 OS MD R 06 33 32 04 05 15 13 14 35 34 03 3N 2W 36 02 32 31 06 01 05 OS LD R 18 03 04 o WC OS 07 34 33 OS 09 08 10 11 07 12 17 15 OS 16 14 13 09 08 17 18 10 11 15 2N 2W 16 12 07 ÿ A GLENDALE 14 13 09 08 17 18 10 16 LD R 26 30 25 20 21 15 23 22 24 LD R 28 29 LD R $ a " ! 22 24 23 20 19 25 26 29 30 21 2N 3W IND IAN SC H OOL LD R 27 21 20 19 22 28 26 27 2N 4W 25 30 28 29 36 35 31 DRAFT ASLD WhiteTanks Conceptual Land Use Plan 02 33 01 06 05 04 MHDR 6-10 du/ac 27 03 01 OS 12 A 07 09 08 OS OS 10 18 13 17 15 R WC 16 OS 12 13 33 04 35 MH D R 36 35 31 32 33 VL DR LD R 35 34 03 LD R 02 MH D R 05 06 MD R 08 MH D R 10 11 18 04 02 LD R 15 EM P 16 14 MD R MD R 01 MD R CO M M 06 10 24 23 19 22 21 24 23 19 BROADW AY 25 36 28 29 30 27 LD R 1N 5W 31 32 33 OS LD R 26 LD R LD R 34 25 30 29 LD R 35 27 28 1N 4W 26 State Trust Land Cities 02 05 06 01 20 25 Rooseve lt Cana 30 l 21 22 28 29 36 31 05 06 12 07 04 03 OS 01 02 32 33 34 35 36 1N 3W 31 MD R MD R 13 14 24 23 26 27 32 34 33 Buckey 06 05 04 03 02 07 MH D R 08 1N 1W 10 09 11 18 08 09 09 10 15 16 14 25 19 20 Interstates U.S.B.L.M. Highways Indian Reservation Roads Military Streams State & Local Park !!! Gas Pipeline 21 28 29 30 22 23 27 15 18 13 24 25 26 o 17 16 19 20 29 30 22 21 28 35 a Ag u 36 31 33 32 35 34 07 08 09 1S 4W 10 11 12 1S 3W 07 D R A F T Very Low Density Res (.5-1 du/ac) Medium High Den Res (6-10 du/ac) Low Density Res (1-3 du/ac) High Density Res (10-15 du/ac) Medium Density Res (3-6 du/ac) Commercial Employment Land Fill Open Space Proposed Roadways 09 08 OS BUCKEYE CONCEPTUAL PLAN - Draft Status 36 03 02 01 05 06 Gila River 04 02 03 1S 2W OS 11 10 07 12 08 09 ash mW Lu OS ASLD CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN for BUCKEYE DRAFT Map #2 . 0 1.5 Miles 3 10 Corge tt W a 11 01 12 33 32 31 BUCKEYE 04 Buckeye ! 05 xtension Canal S outh E 12 11 10 !G GOODYEAR 1N 2W 17 07 12 CO M M e Canal OS Private FEMA Floodplain 06 01 OS 08 03 27 BAS ELIN E 01 04 SOU THERN M Surprise Planning Area 03 CO M M 12 LD R MH D R 15 34 MD R 11 10 16 33 32 AVOND 20 LO Buckeye Planning Area 31 ES T R E L L A 22 SA 1S 6W 36 SARIVAL 21 20 LD R 1S 5W 11 35 34 04 05 OS 02 28 27 CO M M 09 17 18 13 22 ! 29 30 al MD R CO M M EM P 33 32 MD R BUCKEYE 08 31 OS OS EM P 17 07 12 BUCKEYE YUMA Map #2 03 21 Airline Can CO M M 03 LD R MH D R 09 LD R LD R LD R 01 LD R 07 36 LD R COTTON 19 Luke Wash 09 34 LITCHFIELD 20 VL DR CO M M 04 05 Middle School (20Ac) 26 25 26 CITRUS 24 Community Park (25 Ac) 27 30 PE R R Y V I L L E Detention Basin 23 22 Elementary School (10Ac) 28 06 EM P 14 19 24 EM P D 21 CO M M MD R 14 34 MD R MD R MD R 11 OS 23 27 28 29 JACKRABBIT 15 TC 33 MH D R MD R Hassayampa River 16 intersburg ! 32 MH D R MH D R MD R EMP RESORT 31 CO M M VL DR OS VL DR CO M M 02 25 A I R P OR T F 1N 6W COMMERCIAL 36 MD R OS 26 D EA N HDR 10 10-15 du/ac 11 MH D R MCCODOWEL L MM MDR 3-6 du/ac 09 HD R A PA C H E 03 LDR 1-3 du/ac 35 34 MD R T 04 VLDR .5-1 du/ac 32 22 21 CO M M MILLER 34 20 VL DR VL DR CO M M T UR N E R ile W ash Fourm 33 19 2N 1W CO M M MD R 24 23 RA I N B O W 27 19 WATSON 28 24 23 22 Dickey Wash 21 15 CO M M LD R LDR Det Basin 05 LD R VLR VLR WC LDR 11 33 32 WC OS BETH AN Y H OME 2N 6W 23 17 OL IVE 06 09 20 Phill 16 30 25 WC VLR LDR 09 24 23 22 19 OS 35 LDR 03 04 21 18 OS EMP WC 34 WC Det Basin WC OS LDR WC 06 01 32 20 13 VLR 26 LDR EMP 19 OS LDR WC MD R CO M M 2N 5W Jackrabbit Wash 04 31 36 34 3N 4W OS 24 OS VLR WC WC MDR MDR LD R 33 32 WC WC LDR 27 WC 28 VLR LDR OS VLR VLR WC WC Det Basin OS LDR WC WC 3N 5W 33 HDR MDR 25 26 OS LDR White Tank Mountains Regional Park RESORT 23 MDR OS OS HDR MDR Wa sh 27 MDR WC EMP 22 LDR Beardsley Canal 23 WC MDR s h 22 21 06 07 1S 1W 05 08 sh ASLD makes no warranties, implied or expressed, regarding information shown on this map. Produced by Planning / JW 11/2006, revised 2/2007 o:\jlaney\asset\greg\buckeye\BuckeyeConceptualPlan.mxd 04 aR Fr i iv e r 34 03 09 10