FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 STATE SYSTEM OF THE R E P O R T PROGRAMMING AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS www.mcdot.maricopa.gov 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the State of the System Report .............................................................................................. 1 Components of the State of the System Report ....................................................................................... 1 Timeframe of the State of the System Report .......................................................................................... 1 County Goals and Objectives for Transportation...................................................................................... 1 Traffic Management System.................................................................................................... 4 Overview and Background ........................................................................................................................ 4 Purpose of the Traffic Management System ............................................................................................ 4 Transportation System Plan Guidance ...................................................................................................... 4 Traffic Growth and Congestion ................................................................................................................. 4 Improving Traffic Systems Management and Operations ...................................................................... 17 Incident Management............................................................................................................................. 19 Traveler Information ............................................................................................................................... 20 Traffic Management Serving Regional Travel ......................................................................................... 21 Innovation ............................................................................................................................................... 28 Safety Management System ...................................................................................................30 Purpose of the Safety Management System .......................................................................................... 30 MCDOT Safety Management Procedures ............................................................................................... 30 Evaluation of Safety ................................................................................................................................ 30 Spot Safety Improvement Project Accomplishments ............................................................................. 30 County Crash Statistics ............................................................................................................................ 33 Safety Focus Areas .................................................................................................................................. 33 Low Volume Road Management System ...............................................................................44 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 44 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 44 Unpaved County Road System ................................................................................................................ 44 Bridge Management System ..................................................................................................49 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 49 Data Gathering and Analysis ................................................................................................................... 49 Evaluation Criteria................................................................................................................................... 49 Recommendations for TIP Programming Procedures ............................................................................ 50 Current Status of the MCDOT Bridge Management System................................................................... 50 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Asset Management for Structures .......................................................................................................... 50 Federal Funding Eligibility Comparisons ................................................................................................. 50 Notable FY 2014 Bridge Events ............................................................................................................... 56 Synopsis of MCDOT’s Bridge Projects ..................................................................................................... 56 Road Management System.....................................................................................................62 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 62 Summary of MCDOT Paved Facilities ...................................................................................................... 62 Road and Pavement Evaluation Ratings ................................................................................................. 63 Preventive Maintenance Procedures...................................................................................................... 76 FY 2014 Pavement Preservation Results................................................................................................. 76 5-Year Pavement Preservation Plan ....................................................................................................... 83 FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan ..................................................................................................... 84 Asset Management System ....................................................................................................86 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 86 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 86 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) .......................................................................................... 86 Appendix STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures Figure 1: Overview of General Areas of the County as Presented in the TSP........................................... 3 Figure 2: 2013 Two-way Daily Traffic Counts............................................................................................ 6 Figure 3: 2010-2013 Daily Traffic Volume Growth Rates .......................................................................... 9 Figure 4: 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios ................................................................................................ 14 Figure 5: Original MCDOT TMC (left) and New TMC (right) .................................................................... 17 Figure 6: MCDOT FY 2014 Traffic Signal Maintenance Activities Compared to Goal ............................. 18 Figure 7: REACT Calls for FY 2012 - FY 2014 by Jurisdiction.................................................................... 20 Figure 8: Categories of Incidents Responded to by REACT (FY 2012 - FY 2014) ..................................... 20 Figure 9: Regional Rental Car Center at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport ............................... 21 Figure 10: AZTech Regional Archived Data Center (RADS) ..................................................................... 23 Figure 11: Example of Loop 101 Detour Maps........................................................................................ 24 Figure 12: Arizona Crash Incident Clearance Times (2011-2013) ........................................................... 25 Figure 13: Example of the AZTech Performance Indicator Book ............................................................ 27 Figure 14: National Connected Vehicle Test Beds .................................................................................. 28 Figure 15: FY 2013 Safety Improvements on County Roads ................................................................... 31 Figure 16: FY 2014 Safety Improvements on County Roads ................................................................... 32 Figure 17: Fatal Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013............................................................................ 37 Figure 18: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 ............................................... 40 Figure 19: Work Zone Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013.................................................................. 43 Figure 20: Road Surface Types as of 2014 .............................................................................................. 46 Figure 21: FY 2012 - FY 2014 Comparison of Structures with Sufficiency Rating Less than 80 .............. 52 Figure 22: 2014 Bridge Sufficiency Ratings ............................................................................................. 53 Figure 23: Miles of Paved Roads owned by MCDOT (FY 2010 - FY 2014) ............................................... 63 Figure 24: FY 2009 - FY 2014 PCRs for Arterial County Roads ................................................................ 64 Figure 25: FY 2014 PCR for County Roads ............................................................................................... 65 Figure 26: FY 2009 - FY 2014 IRI for County Arterial Roads .................................................................... 68 Figure 27: FY 2014 IRI for County Roads ................................................................................................. 69 Figure 28: FY 2009 - FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Arterial Roads .......................................... 72 Figure 29: FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Roads ....................................................................... 73 Figure 30: FY 2014 Completed Maintenance Mileage ............................................................................ 77 Figure 31: FY 2014 Maintenance Costs ................................................................................................... 78 Figure 32: FY 2014 Pavement Maintenance Activities............................................................................ 80 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 33: FY 2014 Pavement Preservation 5-Year Summary Report .................................................... 83 Figure 34: FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan Summary .................................................................... 85 Figure 35: FY 2015 Estimated Maintenance Costs .................................................................................. 85 Figure 36: FY 2014 TIP Disposition .......................................................................................................... 87 Figure 37: FY 2014 MCDOT Assets Added by Percentage ....................................................................... 87 Figure 38: FY 2014 Land Assets Acquired by MCDOT ............................................................................. 88 Figure 39: FY 2014 Land Asset Reductions.............................................................................................. 89 Tables Table 1: Highest 50 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios ............................................................................... 13 Table 2: Growth of ITS Features for FY 2006 and FY 2014 ...................................................................... 17 Table 3: Bell Road Travel Time Performance for 2007-2013 .................................................................. 19 Table 4: Traveler Information Message Posts (FY 2011 - FY 2014) ......................................................... 21 Table 5: County Crash Rates 1998 - 2013 ............................................................................................... 34 Table 6: Intersection and Non-Intersection Crashes .............................................................................. 35 Table 7: Low Volume Roads Completed in 2013 and 2014 .................................................................... 45 Table 8: Structures with Sufficiency Ratings between 50 and 80 ........................................................... 51 Table 9: Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013 - FY 2017 TIP ............................................................... 56 Table 10: New Bridges and Bridge Improvements Completed in FY 2014 ............................................. 57 Table 11: Bridges Anticipated to Be Under Construction by MCDOT in FY 2015 ................................... 57 Table 12: Projects Currently in the Design Phase by MCDOT ................................................................. 57 Table 13: Summary of FY 2014 Inspection Results ................................................................................. 58 Table 14: Listing of Span Bridges Over 600’ in Overall Length ............................................................... 58 Table 15: Listing of Span Bridges between 300’ and 600’ in Overall Length .......................................... 58 Table 16: Listing of Span Bridges between 100’ and 300’ in Overall Length .......................................... 59 Table 17: Listing of Span Bridges Under 100’ in Overall Length ............................................................. 60 Table 18: Miles of MCDOT Paved Roads FY 2010 - FY 2014 ................................................................... 62 Table 19: Preventive Maintenance Treatment Longevity....................................................................... 76 Table 20: FY 2014 Completed Maintenance Plans.................................................................................. 77 Table 21: FY 2010 - FY 2014 Annual Network Rating Summary ............................................................. 79 Table 22: FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan ..................................................................................... 84 Table 23: FY 2014 TIP Summary .............................................................................................................. 86 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ADOT – Arizona Department of Transportation ALERT – Arizona Local Emergency Response Team AR – Asphalt Rubber ARHM – Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix ATIS – Advanced Traveler Information System BIS – Bridge Investment Study BSR – Bridge Sufficiency Rating CAD – Computer Aided Dispatch Chip Seal HV – Chip Seal High Volume Chip Seal LV – Chip Seal Low Volume CCTV – Closed Circuit Television Cameras DCR – Design Concept Report DMS – Dynamic Message Sign DPS – Department of Public Safety DSRC – Dedicated Short-Range Communications FHWA – Federal Highways Administration FMS – Freeway Management System FY – Fiscal Year GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GASB – Governmental Accounting Standards Board ICM – Integrated Corridor Management IGA – Intergovernmental Agreement IRI – International Roughness Index ITS – Intelligent Transportation Systems LRP – Laser Road Profiler LVR – Low Volume Roads MMITSS – Multi Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System MUTCD – Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices MVMT – Million Vehicle Miles of Travel NUG – National Unified Goal O&D – Open and Declared PCR – Pavement Condition Rating RADS – Regional Archived Data Server RDM – Roadway Design Manual REACT – Regional Emergency Action Coordinating Team RMS – Road Management System SHSP – Strategic Highway Safety Plan SMS – Safety Management System SOS Report – State of the System Report STSP – Strategic Transportation Safety Plan TAB – Transportation Advisory Board TIM Coalition – Traffic Incident Management Coalition TIP – Transportation Improvement Program TMC – Traffic Management Center TOC – Traffic Operations Center TSMO – Traffic Systems Management and Operations TSP – Transportation System Plan USDOT – United States Department of Transportation V/C Ratio – Volume-to-Capacity Ratio V/S Ratio – Volume-to-Service Ratio VMT – Vehicle Miles of Travel M&R – Mill and Replace MAG – Maricopa Association of Governments MAP-21 – Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century MCDOT – Maricopa County Department of Transportation MDI – Model Deployment Initiative STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 v OVERVIEW Overview Purpose of the State of the System Report The State of the System (SOS) Report is a compilation of the physical inventory and status of the Maricopa County Department of Transportation’s (MCDOT’s) transportation system infrastructure. The transportation system include roads, bridges, bicycle facilities, traffic signals, and other facilities. The SOS Report documents the performance and condition of the various components of MCDOT’s transportation system. Components of the State of the System Report The SOS Report includes the following components:  Traffic Management System;  Safety Management System;  Low Volume Road Management System;  Bridge Management System;  Road Management System; and  Asset Management System. Timeframe of the State of the System Report The last SOS Report was completed for the timeframe from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 which is known as Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. No SOS Report was prepared for FY 2013 (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013). This document focuses on FY 2014 (July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) but also includes limited information for FY 2013 in sections that discuss trends over the last several years. A SOS Report for FY 2015 (July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015) will be prepared in late calendar year 2015. It is anticipated that the SOS Report will be prepared annually moving forward. Most of the data analyzed in the SOS Report is aggregated by fiscal year. Notable exceptions are traffic volume count data and traffic crash data, both of which are aggregated by calendar year per industry standards. For timeframe references throughout the document, unless the year is noted as a fiscal year (e.g., FY 2014), the year referenced is a calendar year. County Goals and Objectives for Transportation Comprehensive Plan Guidance The Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1997 and revised in 2002 and directs the management of MCDOT. The Comprehensive Plan helps set direction for the County's transportation system investment, and the following objectives related to the transportation system are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: 1. Employ technology to improve the use of transportation facilities; 2. Identify and accommodate transportation corridors; 3. Optimize public investments; 4. Minimize travel times; 5. Reduce crashes; and 6. Minimize and mitigate impacts of construction and operation. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 1 OVERVIEW Transportation System Plan Guidance The Maricopa County Transportation System Plan (TSP) was adopted in 2007 and sets the overall policies, goals, and fundamental considerations for MCDOT decisions concerning current and future transportation needs and investments. The TSP recommends investment priorities based on three types of routes: primary, secondary, and local. Much of the content of the TSP reflects the County’s Comprehensive Plan guidelines for transportation. Figure 1 provides an overview of the three General Areas that are delineated in the TSP. Throughout this document, all maps that are presented are done so in sets of three, with one map for each area depicted in Figure 1. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 2 OVERVIEW Figure 1: Overview of General Areas of the County as Presented in the TSP STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 3 TRAFFIC Management System Traffic Management System Overview and Background MCDOT’s Traffic Management System – also known as Traffic System Management and Operations (TSMO) – includes the operations and management of traffic on Maricopa County (County) roads. For purposes of this document, County roads are roads that are fully or partially owned and operated by MCDOT or maintained by MCDOT through an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) or through courtesy grading pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 28-6705. MCDOT’s traffic management system includes the infrastructure, policies, and procedures in place to manage existing and potential traffic congestion on County roads as well as information about traffic congestion shared with other agencies and the traveling public. This section incorporates and expands upon information provided in previous SOS reports in the Congestion Management System section. Purpose of the Traffic Management System The purpose of the traffic management system is to:  Identify and measure traffic growth and congestion on County roads; and  Identify and measure how MCDOT improves traffic operations through innovation, intelligent transportation system (ITS) devices, incident management, and traveler information, Transportation System Plan Guidance The TSP includes several objectives related to traffic management to ease traffic congestion, which include: 1. Intersection improvements; 2. Alternate route enhancement; 3. Provide for both current and future traffic volume needs; 4. Monitor and measure congestion; 5. Inform decisions regarding what improvements are needed; 6. Identify alternative actions; 7. Recommend cost-effective mitigation measures; and 8. Evaluate actions related to congestion management. The TSP is currently in the process of being updated. Traffic Growth and Congestion Existing Traffic Volumes and Historical Growth Traffic growth and congestion are evaluated on all County roads for which traffic volume information is available from MCDOT’s traffic count program. Traffic counts from 2013 are considered “existing” traffic volumes for the purpose of the FY 2014 SOS Report. Maps labeled Figure 2 show the two-way daily traffic volume counts conducted by MCDOT on County roads in 2013. At locations where no count was taken in 2013, the most recent prior year’s count is reported. In locations where only one directional count was taken, the count was doubled to represent a two-way count. In rural areas, traffic volumes on County roads are generally less than 12,000 vehicles per day. In urban areas, traffic volumes on County roads are generally less than 30,000 vehicles per day. Bell Road is a notable exception at nearly 60,000 vehicles per day. Maps labeled Figure 3 show the average annual growth rate of the two-way daily traffic volume counts on County roads between 2010 and 2013. At locations where no traffic counts were taken in 2010 or 2013, STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 4 TRAFFIC Management System the most recent prior year’s count was utilized. Traffic volume growth rates vary widely across the County but are generally highest in the areas currently experiences rapid land development. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 5 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 2: 2013 Two-way Daily Traffic Counts Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 6 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 2: 2013 Two-way Daily Traffic Counts Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 7 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 2: 2013 Two-way Daily Traffic Counts Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 8 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 3: 2010-2013 Daily Traffic Volume Growth Rates Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 9 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 3: 2010-2013 Daily Traffic Volume Growth Rates Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 10 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 3: 2010-2013 Daily Traffic Volume Growth Rates Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 11 TRAFFIC Management System Traffic Congestion Performance Measures MCDOT has recently developed a traffic congestion performance measure known as the volume-toservice-standard-threshold (V/S) ratio. In contrast to the standard volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio, which compares traffic volumes to road capacity, the V/S ratio compares the volume on a given road segment to the maximum volume considered acceptable by MCDOT for the characteristics of that road segment. A road segment with a V/S ratio value over 1.0 is considered to have unacceptable levels of congestion. Table 1 lists the 50 County road segments with the highest V/S ratios. Maps labeled Figure 4 show the V/S ratio for the road segments for which 2013 traffic volume counts were available. It should be noted that the table and the figures exclude local roads. Most of the County’s roads have V/S ratios well below 1.0 but there are some road segments with a V/S ratio that approaches or exceeds 1.0. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 12 TRAFFIC Management System Table 1: Highest 50 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 On Road Litchfield Rd Rittenhouse Rd Baseline Rd Gilbert Rd Elliot Rd 51st Ave 67th Ave Ocotillo Rd Southern Ave Rittenhouse Rd 51st Ave Granite Valley Dr Beltline Rd Southern Ave Broadway Rd Carefree Hwy Broadway Rd Val Vista Dr Hunt Hwy Beltline Rd 151st Ave 67th Ave Carefree Hwy Broadway Rd 135th Ave Val Vista Dr Riggs Rd Bell Rd Bell Rd Carefree Hwy Meeker Blvd Bell Rd Olive Ave 67th Ave Bell Rd Indian School Rd Carefree Hwy Baseline Rd El Mirage Rd Olive Ave Baseline Rd Riggs Rd Carefree Hwy 111th Ave Cotton Ln 117th Ave Olive Ave Olive Ave Fort McDowell Rd Camino Del Sol Reference Road N. of Olive Ave S. of Combs Rd E. of 64th Ave N. of Brooks Farm Rd E. of Ellsworth Rd N. of Pecos Rd S. of Broadway Rd W. of Meridian Rd W. of 47th Ave S. of Via de Palmas S. of Pecos Rd N. of Meeker Blvd S. of Santa Cruz Rd W. of 39th Ave E. of 35th Ave W. of 52nd Ave E. of 59th Ave S. of Thomas Rd W. of Sossaman Rd W. of SR-347 N. of Johnson Blvd N. of Broadway Rd E. of 7th Ave E. of 79th Ave S. of Deer Valley Rd S. of Ocotillo Rd W. of 187th Ave E. and W. of Del Webb Blvd E. of 99th Ave E. and W. of 36th Ave N. of Grand Ave W. of 99th Ave E. of Litchfield Rd N. of Baseline Rd E. and W. of Burns Rd E. of 107th Ave E. of 7th St N. of US-85 N. of Bell Rd W. of Cotton Ln E. of 67th Ave E. of I-10 E. of 16th St N. of US-60 N. of Olive Ave N. of Pinnacle Peak Rd W. of Litchfield Rd W. of 99th Ave N. of SR-87 NW. of Johnson Blvd Number of Lanes 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 5 6 2 2 6 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 Daily Volume (2010) 20,771 29,611 16,145 22,568 11,170 8,022 13,092 17,963 12,621 20,491 8,546 16,434 7,222 8,064 11,526 21,932 6,793 7,297 9,059 6,980 11,358 9,886 19,486 11,496 10,067 9,294 4,907 53,830 55,817 19,025 23,911 56,350 14,669 10,891 59,994 30,103 17,229 6,614 11,499 7,029 16,145 13,791 12,953 1,107 6,044 7,470 8,337 37,576 5,637 11,115 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Daily Volume (2013) 16,540 21,777 16,957 24,233 14,804 8,892 15,714 19,215 18,276 18,184 7,666 11,906 7,092 15,772 12,816 18,462 11,798 6,535 6,530 6,308 10,290 11,238 17,219 11,038 9,793 13,547 5,285 56,578 56,238 16,191 25,602 55,403 15,064 9,937 53,206 28,239 14,296 8,235 13,331 9,024 16,957 12,922 13,640 48,712 10,712 8,002 12,252 29,427 4,050 7,415 2010-2013 Daily Volume Annual Growth Rate -5.54% -7.39% 1.23% 1.80% 15.12% 2.61% 4.67% 2.25% 9.70% -2.94% -2.68% -7.74% -0.45% 18.26% 5.45% -4.22% 14.80% -3.09% -8.21% -2.50% -2.44% 3.26% -4.00% -1.01% -0.69% 9.88% -0.85% 1.25% 0.19% -3.95% 1.72% -0.42% 0.67% -2.27% -2.96% -1.59% -4.56% 5.63% 7.67% 6.45% 1.23% -1.61% 1.72% -5.82% 15.38% 3.50% 10.10% -5.93% 0.06% -9.62% 2013 Daily V/S Ratio 1.798 1.701 1.662 1.616 1.609 1.588 1.541 1.501 1.428 1.421 1.369 1.294 1.266 1.232 1.187 1.161 1.157 1.149 1.148 1.126 1.118 1.102 1.083 1.082 1.064 1.058 1.057 1.032 1.026 1.018 1.016 1.011 1.004 0.974 0.971 0.914 0.899 0.895 0.889 0.885 0.874 0.861 0.858 0.854 0.837 0.817 0.817 0.811 0.810 0.806 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 13 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 4: 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 14 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 4: 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 15 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 4: 2013 Road Segment V/S Ratios Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 16 TRAFFIC Management System Improving Traffic Systems Management and Operations Data Gathering and Analysis Graphs, tables, and figures provided in this section are derived from established MCDOT reporting programs and are summarized herein. Some data sets have established goals associated with the annual collection of information while some data sets are simply reporting activity showing trending of data rather than performance compared to a specified goal. Data applies to FY 2014 unless otherwise noted. Intelligent Transportation Systems A network of ITS devices such as traffic signals, closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV) mounted on traffic signals, dynamic message signs (DMS), traffic detection, and communications infrastructure allows the MCDOT Traffic Management Center (TMC) to manage traffic on County roads. The operators at the MCDOT TMC use the ITS devices to monitor traffic conditions and develop final timing plans as warranted to relieve congestion, post messages on DMS to alert motorists to road conditions, and dispatch the County incident response team. The real-time services enabled through ITS help in reducing delays and enhancing safety. The MCDOT TMC was initially built in 1998 and moved in 2012 to a larger facility that allowed for more operational capabilities. Figure 5 shows the original TMC and the new TMC. Figure 5: Original MCDOT TMC (left) and New TMC (right) The MCDOT TMC has access to other jurisdictions’ ITS devices based on permissions agreed to by MCDOT and those jurisdictions to manage traffic and support incident and event management. MCDOT actively manages the signal system operations, provides regional monitoring of CCTV and DMS on freeways and arterials, and collects and processes data feeds for arterial and freeway traffic movement. The TMC also develops signal timing plans for MCDOT-owned traffic signals and changes/implements traffic signal timing using pre-set timing plans in response to real-time conditions. Table 2 compares the FY 2006 and FY 2014 levels of deployment for ITS infrastructure to measure growth in having and operating ITS devices. Table 2: Growth of ITS Features for FY 2006 and FY 2014 ITS Feature CCTV Cameras DMS with Travel Time Posting Capabilities Traffic Signals with Communication to TMC FY 2006 Amount 32 0 36 FY 2014 Amount 60 5 111 % Growth 2006-2014 187% 208% The MCDOT TMC operates ITS devices to manage congestion, incidents, and events on County roads. The percentage of uptime of ITS devices and communications to support those activities is an important measure the TMC tracks because it reflects the availability of the ITS infrastructure to support management of traffic. The MCDOT 2006 ITS Business Plan established a goal of having TMC-device communications to 95% of ITS field devices within 10 years. In 2006, 30% of field devices had communications connections to the TMC. As of the end of FY 2014, 93% of field devices are connected to the TMC. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 17 TRAFFIC Management System Performance of systems is critical to effective traffic management. TMC staff routinely performs system health checks and logs the status of devices and systems on the MCDOT TMC Performance Activity Log. The operators notify technical staff for troubleshooting support, if needed. MCDOT collects data to support performance metrics established for the TMC as well as the analysis of incidents and other as-needed requests for performance reporting. MCDOT tracks scheduled and unscheduled maintenance of MCDOT-owned traffic signals with the following goals:  Complete preventative maintenance for 90% of all traffic signals within the monthly preset schedules; and  Respond to 90% of unscheduled repair work within two hours of notification. Both include a level of maintenance to traffic signals that meets all federal, state, and local standards. Figure 6 highlights the FY 2014 performance of MCDOT signal maintenance staff in meeting the aforementioned 90% goal. MCDOT Traffic Signals Maintained to Meet All Federal, State & Local Standards Percent that Meets Standards 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Fiscal Year 2014 Mar Apr May Jun % Scheduled Maintenance Work Orders Completed Within MFR Measurement % Unscheduled Maintenance Completed within 2 Hours of Notification Goal - 90% Figure 6: MCDOT FY 2014 Traffic Signal Maintenance Activities Compared to Goal Bell Road Bell Road has been a priority corridor for MCDOT since 2000 when a Traffic Management Study was completed between Loop 303 and Loop 101. In 2004, a Concept of Operations and ITS Operations Plan were completed that defined the roles and responsibilities of traffic, incident, and traveler information management along the corridor across the multiple jurisdictions of Surprise, the County, and Peoria. Since 2004, ITS devices including CCTV, DMS, fiber communications to all devices and traffic signals were designed and installed in a series of three phases. In 2013, the ITS Operations Plan was updated to STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 18 TRAFFIC Management System reflect current operating conditions as well as incorporate the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) roles and responsibilities for the corridor. Although the corridor has experienced increased average daily traffic volumes, travel times have been reduced, as shown in Table 3 over multiple years since 2007. Table 3: Bell Road Travel Time Performance for 2007-2013 % Change in Travel Time Direction AM – Eastbound (EB)* 2007 - 2008 -7.3% 2009 0.0% 2010 -6.2% 2011 0.0% 2012 0.0% 2013 0.0% PM – Westbound (WB)* - -3.5% 0.0% -24.8% 0.0% 0.0% -9.7% Combined EB & WB - -5.0% 0.0% -17.4% 0.0% 0.0% -5.3% Cumulative Change - -5.0% -5.0% -22.5% -22.5% -22.5% -27.8% * Peak Hour - Direction Bell Road runs through six jurisdictions over a 25-mile corridor: Surprise, the County, Peoria, Glendale, Phoenix, and Scottsdale. The partner agencies along Bell Road have been planning for multiple years for an adaptive system(s) to be implemented along strategic sections of Bell Road. A Concept of Operations and System Requirements for four different segments along Bell Road have been developed to outline the deployment of signal control technology to the existing signal system. In 2013, the Bell Road corridor began providing arterial travel times. The Bell Road corridor is using third party and probe data as well as integrating freeway detection information to collect and post travel times eastbound as a pilot program in the County jurisdiction. The pilot program is being planned to expand along the entire Bell Road corridor across the Valley. Incident Management The MCDOT Regional Emergency Action Coordinating Team (REACT) is a team of personnel that dispatch to an incident scene on arterials throughout the County to provide first-responder emergency services (e.g., police, fire, medical) with traffic management and control assistance so the responders can focus on their responsibilities and clear incidents quickly, thereby reducing the likelihood of secondary crashes. REACT has six IGAs with agencies throughout the Phoenix Metropolitan region that cover 1,054 miles of road. These agencies include:  ADOT;  Glendale;  Peoria;  Avondale;  Scottsdale; and  Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community. The MCDOT TMC has access to incident data on freeways from the Arizona (DPS) and Phoenix Fire (arterial incidents) Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems. Incident management is one of the primary functions of the MCDOT TMC. For incidents occurring on County-owned roads and local agency-owned roads, the TMC supports the the County Sheriff’s Office, DPS, and local public safety agencies via alerts, closure reporting, scene monitoring through camera images (where available), and media relations (if needed). For all incidents that have requested REACT Team response, the TMC serves as the contact in actively STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 19 TRAFFIC Management System supporting REACT personnel as well as supporting the local agency that requested REACT support. For larger freeway incidents, REACT may be called upon to coordinate with ALERT. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show data tracking completed by MCDOT for REACT team activity. To date, there have been no secondary crashes while REACT is present and established at the incident site. REACT Calls for FY 2012 - FY 2014 Number of Call outs Jurisdiction Distribution 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 91 78 73 25 22 26 30 16 13 2 Maricopa County Glendale Peoria 7 4 2 1 2 State 0 0 Avondale 8 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Tolleson Rural Metro 6 4 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 Fire Assist Special Events Scottsdale Salt River IC Jurisdiction 2012 2013 2014 Figure 7: REACT Calls for FY 2012 - FY 2014 by Jurisdiction Number of Incidents Categories of Incidents Responded to by REACT (FY 2012 - FY 2014) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 79 64 54 44 51 51 13 0 2 2 1 2 2 4 4 4 Accident Accident Accident with No with Injuries with Fatal Injuries Haz Mat Homicide 2012 2013 8 2 Criminal Investigation 2014 Figure 8: Categories of Incidents Responded to by REACT (FY 2012 - FY 2014) Traveler Information The activities that MCDOT performs have a regional impact as the County has jurisdiction in STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 20 TRAFFIC Management System unincorporated areas within and surrounding the Phoenix metropolitan area. The MCDOT TMC provides various traveler information functions for the County as well as regionally. This includes e-mail traffic alerts, tweets, text alerts, data entry into MCDOT’s Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) program for arterial incidents and events for automated posting to the statewide 511 traveler information system, and travel time messages to DMS. As part of the Regional Rental Car Center implementation for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (shown in Figure 9), MCDOT developed a travel time and congestion information display system for travelers that need information to key locations in the metropolitan area. There are currently eight travel displays as part of this system located at the Rental Car Center and some key downtown public facilities. Figure 9: Regional Rental Car Center at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport MCDOT also operates and maintains nine DMS along Bell Road, MC-85, and McDowell Road that provide traveler information to the traveling public. Table 4 shows the number of traveler information messages posted from the MCDOT TMC between FY 2011 and FY 2014. Table 4: Traveler Information Message Posts (FY 2011 - FY 2014) Year FY 11 Traveler Information Messages Posted 5,170 Year-to-Year % Growth - FY 12 5,865 14% FY 13 6,204 6% FY 14 6,763 9% In an effort to broaden the scope, reach and timeliness of MCDOT’s overall public outreach efforts, it was formally announced on May 14, 2013 that the MCDOT TMC and REACT traffic incident management team have joined the MCDOT Public Affairs Office News Twitter feed. In addition to important news about MCDOT projects, @MCDOTNEWS Twitter followers now receive major TMC Traffic Alerts and are notified in “real time” of major incidents on Valley roads that could impact their commutes. The Twitter account @MCDOTNEWS has 1,473 followers, follows 111 other agencies and media Twitter feeds for retweets, and tweets 5-25 times each day depending on the amount of incidents or news reports happening that day. Information is regularly retweeted from @ArizonaDOT and @PhxTrafficAlert. Traffic Management Serving Regional Travel AZTech MCDOT serves as a program leader for the AZTech Regional Transportation Partnership. Through regional collaboration, this partnership aims to integrate and improve regional traffic management. Individual cities and towns deploy, operate, and maintain their ITS systems and equipment, and MCDOT STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 21 TRAFFIC Management System helps to integrate these efforts to facilitate better regional traffic management and coordination. The regional AZTech activities that are coordinated through MCDOT Traffic Management Division include:  Institutional collaboration and public-private partnerships;  Center-Center communications infrastructure development;  Inter-agency operations;  Regional traveler information support; and  Incident management. AZTech was initially established in 1996 as one of four metropolitan areas selected by USDOT for the ITS Metropolitan Model Deployment Initiative (MDI). The AZTech partnership was formed as a result of this MDI to integrate the region’s transportation system and give travelers up-to-the-minute traffic information through innovative partnerships among public sector and private sector technology companies. AZTech successfully completed the MDI in 2000 and has transitioned into a permanent partnership that continues to serve as a forum for innovation in transportation systems operations and management in the County. AZTech brings together decision makers and practitioners with a consensus-based approach to traffic management. ADOT and MCDOT provide joint leadership for the AZTech program. Members include ADOT, Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), Valley Metro, DPS, the County, cities, towns, and private partners. Members represent state and county traffic management and operations, regional transit operations, regional planning, municipal traffic and transportation agencies, state and regional law enforcement and public safety and emergency services. MCDOT and ADOT continue their leadership roles chairing the AZTech Executive Committee, which sets strategic direction for the AZTech partnership. The AZTech Strategy Task Force is a subgroup of the Executive Committee, and is comprised of senior staff from member agencies across the region. AZTech also includes the following committees and working groups, which meet regularly and include representation from multiple partner agencies. These committees include:  Operations Committee;  Traffic Incident Management Coalition;  Advanced Traveler Information Systems Working Group; and  TMC Operators Working Group. RADS In 2003, MCDOT, ADOT, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) developed and implemented an innovative archive and retrieval system for ITS data. The Regional Archived Data Server (RADS) was designed to provide and maintain valid, classified ITS-derived data for use in transportation system planning and modeling. MCDOT is responsible for management and oversight of RADS, and local jurisdictions provide data as appropriate to the RADS server as shown in Figure 10. The RADS server is housed in the ADOT traffic operations center (TOC) and ADOT provides technical support for maintenance activities to the server. RADS has become a critical part of the region’s data-sharing strategy. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 22 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 10: AZTech Regional Archived Data Center (RADS) The system is linked with ADOT’s Highway Condition Reporting System (HCRS) to provide real-time traffic data to support speed maps on the AZ511 website as well as supplemental road condition information collected from public safety agencies and local agencies not already provided through the HCRS system. RADS takes ITS data from systems throughout the Phoenix metropolitan area, stores the data in a centralized archived data server, and then makes the data available for a variety of users through a common Internet interface. Processes incorporated into the RADS system includes:  ADOT freeway management system (FMS) detector station data;  Travel times based on FMS detector station data that are displayed on freeway DMS, at the Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center, and at County buildings in downtown Phoenix;  ADOT HCRS events;  Phoenix Fire incident data; and  Traffic signal timing and traffic characteristic data from local jurisdictions. A summary of RADS implementation for years 2013 and 2014 is provided below. Integration of third-party travel time data  2013: integrated third-party travel time data (Nokia/HERE) in RADS. The third-party travel time data is provided based on the Traffic Message Channel, which contains pre-defined STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 23 TRAFFIC Management System segments of road of the County. The travel time data is updated every minute and archived in RADS. Expansion of travel time display on DMS using RADS travel time module  2013: freeway DMS travel time expansion processed by RADS.  2013-2014: implemented DMS travel time in several jurisdictions along the Bell Road corridor. The third-party travel time data was used to compute the travel time of the corridors advised on the respective DMS. The jurisdictions include Surprise, Peoria, Glendale, and Sun City (managed by the County). Assessment of RADS IT architecture  2013: a study was conducted to assess the IT architecture of RADS in anticipation of future growth. The study assessed the needs of RADS in terms of communications, data storage, security, and processing. Implementation of AZTech Regional Information System (ARIS)  2014: MCDOT developed an advanced tool for operators for notification and monitoring during incidents in the metropolitan area. The ARIS system uses information from RADS to display current speeds on freeways and arterials (where instrumented with detection), traffic volumes, freeway and arterial cameras, and incident status updates based on the Phoenix Fire CAD system. This helps operators receive timely notifications and understand the breadth of impact surrounding the incident location and provides a tool to manage in a cross-jurisdictional manner. Loop 101 ICM In 2014, ADOT, DPS, MCDOT, Scottsdale, ALERT, REACT, Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community and MAG jointly completed an Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Program for the Loop 101 corridor in Scottsdale. The plan includes traffic management protocols between operating and responding agencies involved in freeway detour of traffic and specific alternate routing options through the arterial network of Scottsdale. This Program uses a strategic combination of Scottsdale arterial signal and infrastructure control, ADOT freeway DMS messaging, ALERT freeway traffic control support, REACT arterial traffic control support, and other responding services. This ICM Program also produced a Detour Guidebook that provided specific detour planning for segments of Loop 101 through Scottsdale and roles for each specific detour for each responding/operating agency involved in freeway closure impacts, as shown in Figure 11. Figure 11: Example of Loop 101 Detour Maps STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 24 TRAFFIC Management System In early January 2014, the southbound Loop 101 freeway was shut down for a period of 4 hours due to an officer-involved incident while an investigation was completed. The partners successfully implemented the ICM plan and traffic was diverted to an arterial that was efficiently managed. Traffic Incident Management The AZTech Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Coalition was initiated in 2011 following TIM workshops in 2010 that addressed the need for a TIM Coalition in Arizona. Arizona DPS is the lead of the TIM Coalition and its members include FHWA, ADOT, MAG, first responders, medical examiners, towing and recovery entities, and Public Information Officers. The focus is to achieve the TIM National Unified Goal (NUG). NUG priorities include:  Responder safety;  Safe, quick clearance; and  Prompt, reliable, interoperable communications. The TIM Coalition has helped to improve cross-discipline communications, increase exposure to TIM training courses to attend in Arizona, debrief secondary incidents, and conduct joint training and planning. As of July 2014, the TIM Coalition had conducted 108 TIM 4-hour classes with 2,815 first responders and produced two training videos to educate how traffic reporters play a critical role in reducing congestion and improve safety. Figure 12 provides a comparison of incident clearance times over a three-year period, as reported by DPS. While the clearance times of minor incidents increased between 2009 and 2011, the clearance times for intermediate and major incidents decreased. Additionally, a major performance metric is the percentage of secondary crashes that occur in the state: Arizona is experiencing a 7% secondary crash rate compared to a near 20% average rate nationally. Arizona Crash Incident Clearance Times (2011-2013) 70 Pertentage of Incidents 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minor (30-mins or less) Intermediate (31-119 mins) Major (120 mins or more) Length of Time to Clear Incident 2011 2012 2013 Figure 12: Arizona Crash Incident Clearance Times (2011-2013) STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 25 TRAFFIC Management System AZTech TM&O Performance Indicator Book Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), the current highway authorization, emphasizes performance management and monitoring across multiple transportation modes. MCDOT completed an AZTech Traffic Management and Operations Performance Indicators Book (Book) in year 2011. The Book combines key regional traffic management, traffic operations, and transit performance measures that are tracked and reported throughout the Phoenix metropolitan region. The Book has been completed for years 2011 and 2013 and is underway in 2015 with the goal being to publish it every two years. The 2013 Book identified data collection corridors in the region for measuring travel time data year-to-year. An example of the Book is shown in Figure 13. The Book is available for download and distributed electronically to a statewide and nationwide group of individuals with influence in national committees and activities. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 26 TRAFFIC Management System Figure 13: Example of the AZTech Performance Indicator Book STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 27 TRAFFIC Management System Innovation MCDOT has strived to be at the leading edge of innovation in transportation both locally and nationally. This section provides a brief status update of MCDOT’s lead or involvement with innovative projects and programs. SMARTDrive Through a federal initiative called “Connected Vehicles”, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) is working to leverage ITS technology to improve traffic operations to support public safety and surface transportation mobility. MCDOT and its partners at ADOT, the FHWA, and the University of Arizona are moving this initiative forward to develop and demonstrate advanced ITS applications that integrate vehicles together with road systems in the County. MCDOT’s SMARTDrive ProgramSM, which originated in 2007, represents an evolution of connected vehicle research, testing and implementation in Anthem in unincorporated County. Initiated as a research project through the Arizona Transportation Research Center, SMARTDrive has successfully demonstrated live operations and connectivity in a test bed environment, and has been established as a formal test bed for other connected vehicle technology and application developers to use. A map of the existing national test beds is shown in Figure 14. Figure 14: National Connected Vehicle Test Beds The MCDOT SMARTDrive Test bed will continue to focus on traffic signal operations safety and mobility applications. MCDOT has deployed applications under the USDOT and Connected Vehicle Pooled Fund Program Multi Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System (MMITSS) initiative. The test bed in Anthem will continue to be expanded on in the upcoming years and demonstrated to local, state, and national stakeholders. Key components of the SMARTDrive demonstrations include:  Six signalized intersections equipped with Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Radios, WiFi and Bluetooth readers;  Traffic signal priority application installed;  Representative emergency vehicle and transit vehicle used to test application priority logic; STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 28 TRAFFIC Management System  Field test for emergency and transit applications;  Pedestrian crosswalk application using smartphones to display crossing status; and  Collection of detailed vehicle and traffic operations data for post-operational analysis. As a result of these achievements and the County’s commitment to ongoing innovative research, testing and implementation, the County is recognized by USDOT as one of six Connected Vehicle test beds in the nation. The USDOT announced in late 2014 that in early 2015 it will release a federal grant funding opportunity to advance Connected Vehicle implementation. MCDOT has worked in recent years to position itself and the region for pursuing federal funding for Connected Vehicle initiatives. MCDOT is proactively developing potential concepts and applications that would be the basis of a competitive proposal once the USDOT releases a formal request. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 29 SAFETY Management System Safety Management System Purpose of the Safety Management System The County Safety Management System (SMS) is a systematic process that has three goals. These include:  Document the road safety improvements made by the County during the previous fiscal year;  Identify the location, type, and severity of traffic crashes in the unincorporated portions of the County; and  Report trends in traffic crashes and recommend improvements to reduce the number and rate of crashes. MCDOT Safety Management Procedures MCDOT makes every effort to respond quickly to identify safety problems. These problems are frequently identified through public complaints about unsafe road conditions, first-hand observation by County staff members, and reviews of recent crash records for County roads. When an actual problem or potential problem is encountered, a detailed engineering analysis may be conducted and recommendations are made to correct the situation. These recommendations are handled in one of three ways based on the recommendation:  Relatively simple and inexpensive solutions are handled through the MCDOT maintenance process.  More complex problems are handled by the MCDOT Traffic Engineering Division.  Complex problems involving significant changes that require substantial funding amounts are handled through the MCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Evaluation of Safety MCDOT Traffic Engineering is continuing its program to identify and evaluate locations with potential safety concerns and prioritize and schedule improvements for upcoming years. The initial step each year is to examine the location and number of crashes, crash rates, injury severity, and the types of crashes occurring on County roads to identify locations with potential safety concerns. At these locations, crash history is used to evaluate the road and determine if improvements are required. Crash locations are plotted as indicated on ADOT crash reports. If five or more correctable crashes are detected within a road segment or intersection and occur within a 12-month period, an engineering evaluation is conducted to determine if an action should be taken. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) provides guidance to determine if an identified safety problem meets the criteria (‘warrants’) for the installation of multi-way stop control or traffic signals. There are additional warrant factors that may also be used to determine if an intersection needs improvements such as additional turn lanes or other safety items. Projects that meet the ‘warrant’ criteria are typically implemented in the order in which they are identified. The average daily traffic, road function, posted speed, and scheduled transportation improvement projects are also used to help determine if and when improvements are required. Spot Safety Improvement Project Accomplishments The safety improvement projects that were completed in FY 2013 can be found in Figure 15. In FY 2014, twelve safety improvement projects were completed; the location of these projects can be found in Figure 16. These were implemented by the MCDOT Traffic Engineering Division. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 30 SAFETY Management System Figure 15: FY 2013 Safety Improvements on County Roads STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 31 SAFETY Management System Figure 16: FY 2014 Safety Improvements on County Roads STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 32 SAFETY Management System County Crash Statistics The County crash rate summarizes the historical safety performance of the entire County-owned or maintained road system. The County crash rate measures the annual number of crashes per million vehicle miles of travel (MVMT) on the County road system. Table 5 shows that the County crash rate increased in 2013 compared to 2012 and is above the 2009-2013 5-year average. MCDOT also tracks crash rates for crashes involving fatalities, single vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, injuries, and work zones. Most of these crash rates increased in 2013 compared to 2012 and are above the 5-year average. The only exception is the work zone crash rate, which in 2013 was lower than the 5year average. Table 5 also compares the number of crashes to the population in unincorporated portions of the County. While the total number of crashes in the unincorporated County increased in 2013 compared to 2012, the unincorporated County population also increased, resulting in a net decrease in the number of crashes per 100,000 population. Most other types of crashes declined in 2013 compared to 2012 on a per 100,000 population, with crashes involving fatalities and pedestrians being the exceptions. Safety Focus Areas The state of Arizona has established twelve Emphasis Areas within the Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that indicate the areas that ADOT and other state agencies are focused on in order to improve safety in the state. The twelve Arizona SHSP Emphasis Areas are:  Speeding and Aggressive Driving;  Impaired Driving;  Occupant Protection;  Motorcycles;  Distracted Driving;  Roadway Infrastructure and Operations Improvement;  Age-related;  Heavy Vehicles/Buses/Transit;  Non-Motorized Users;  Natural Risks;  Traffic Incident Management;  Inter-jurisdictional Coordination;  Data Analysis Improvements; and  Policy Initiatives. Based on the Arizona SHSP initiatives, MAG developed its own set of Action Areas for the MAG Strategic Transportation Safety Plan (STSP). These Action Areas were developed to work with and supplement the statewide Emphasis Areas, recognizing that the MAG planning area is largely urbanized while most of the State highway system traverses areas that are more rural. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 33 SAFETY Management System Table 5: County Crash Rates 1998 - 2013 County Crash Rate* 1.43 1.30 1.01 1.12 1.37 2009-2013 5-Year Average 1.25 County Fatality Rate** 1.62 1.13 1.49 1.26 1.98 1.50 +32% Arizona Fatality Rate** 1.34 1.27 1.39 1.37 1.39 1.35 +3% U.S. Fatality Rate** Single Vehicle Crash Rate* Pedestrian Crash Rate* 1.15 1.11 1.10 1.14 1.10 1.12 -2% 0.318 0.255 0.214 0.238 0.281 0.261 +8% 0.009 0.014 0.010 0.008 0.014 0.011 +27% Bicycle Crash Rate* 0.011 0.018 0.015 0.015 0.017 0.015 +12% Injury Crash Rate* 0.254 0.204 0.160 0.200 0.235 0.211 +12% Work Zone Related Rate* 0.044 0.036 0.022 0.025 0.021 0.030 -29% Total County Crashes Miles of County Owned Roads That Have Traffic Counts Total County Road Miles 2,913 2,865 2,641 2,841 2,901 2,832 +2% 1,622 1,616 1,259 1,249 1,259 1,401 -10% 2,419 2,353 2,393 2,392 1,999 2,311 -14% Million Vehicle Miles/Day Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT)/Mile % Network with Traffic Counts 5.5903 6.0543 7.1479 6.9488 5.8111 6.3105 -8% 2,311 2,573 2,987 2,905 2,907 2,737 +6% 67.05% 68.68% 52.61% 52.22% 62.98% 60.71% +2% County Population 244,700 245,801 274,673 276,634 288,366 266,035 +8% Crashes Per 100K Pop 1,190.4 1,165.6 961.5 1,027.0 1,006.0 1,070.1 -6% 29 24 34 27 40 31 +30% 11.85 9.76 12.38 9.76 13.87 11.52 +20% 33 25 39 32 42 34 +23% 13.49 10.17 14.20 11.57 14.56 12.80 +14% 649 563 558 604 597 594 +0.5% 265.22 229.05 203.15 218.34 207.03 224.56 -8% Factors Fatal Crashes Fatal/100K Pop County Fatalities County Fatalities/100K Pop Single Vehicle Crashes Single Vehicle/100K Pop Pedestrian Crashes 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 vs. 5-Year Average +10% 18 30 27 21 30 25 +19% 7.36 12.20 9.83 7.59 10.40 9.5 +10% 23 39 38 38 37 35 +6% Bicycle/100K Pop 9.40 15.87 13.83 13.74 12.83 13.13 -2% Injury Crashes 518 451 417 506 499 478 +4% 211.69 183.48 151.82 182.91 173.04 180.59 -4% 90 79 57 64 45 67 -33% 36.78 32.14 20.75 23.14 15.61 25.68 -39% Pedestrian/100K Pop Bicycle Crashes Injury/100K Pop Work Zone Related Work Zone/100K Pop Source: Crash data is from ADOT, modified by MCDOT. Only crashes on County-owned or maintained roads are included. *Crashes per MVMT **Fatalities per 100 MVMT STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 34 SAFETY Management System MAG established the following Action Areas:  Eliminate Death and Injury from Speeding and Aggressive Driving Behavior;  Eliminate Impaired Driving;  Eliminate Death and Injury Related to Intersections;  Eliminate Death and Injury Involving Young Roadway Users;  Eliminate Death and Injury Involving Vulnerable Road Users – Bicyclists, Pedestrians, Persons with Disabilities; and  Improve Data Collection, Quality, Availability, Integration, and Analysis for Decision-Making. Based on these two sets of emphasis/action areas, MCDOT has identified four main Focus Areas for its safety program. These Focus Areas were identified as those that MCDOT, as a transportation agency, could most directly influence and take actions to improve. The MCDOT Focus Areas are:  Intersection Crashes;  Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crashes;  Non-motorized (Bicycle and Pedestrian) Crashes; and  Work Zone Crashes. Intersection Crashes Table 6 provides a summary of crashes that have occurred on County roads between 2009 and 2013. Crashes include those that occur within intersections as well as those that were not related to intersections. In total, there were 456 reported intersection crashes and 85 non-intersection crashes over the 5-year period. The table also delineates those crashes that were fatal and those that resulted in incapacitating injuries. For intersection crashes, the most prevalent type of crash was single vehicle crashes, with 30% of fatal crashes and 31% of crashes resulting in incapacitating injuries were a result of single vehicle crashes. The most prevalent type of non-intersection crash was also single vehicle crashes, which accounted for 57% of fatal crashes and 46% of crashes resulting in incapacitating injuries. With intersection crashes being such a large percentage of total crashes, MCDOT will continue to take actions such as the current process for performing safety analyses on intersections that experience five or more reported crashes over a 12-month period. Table 6: Intersection and Non-Intersection Crashes Type of Crash Angle Head On Left Turn Rear End Sideswipe Single Vehicle Other Total Intersection Crashes Fatal Incapacitating Injury (% of Total) (% of Total) 24% 26% 8% 4% 13% 14% 4% 15% 1% 4% 30% 31% 20% 6% 100% 100% Non-Intersection Crashes Fatal Incapacitating Injury (% of Total) (% of Total) 0% 10% 0% 3% 0% 8% 7% 17% 0% 10% 57% 46% 36% 6% 100% 100% STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 35 SAFETY Management System Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crashes Maps labeled Figure 17 show the number and location of fatal crashes reported between 2009 and 2013. While fatal crashes represent a small percentage of total crashes, they represent a large percentage of the societal cost of crashes in terms of medical expense and lost wages. Reducing the frequency of these high-severity crashes has become a priority at the federal, state, and local level. The County fatality rate increased in 2013 to 1.98 fatalities per 100 MVMT compared to 1.26 in 2012, but this value is still below the historical average fatality rate of 2.18. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes Maps labeled Figure 18 show the number and location of fatal bicycle and pedestrian crashes on County roads. While bicycle and pedestrian crashes represent a small percentage of total crashes, the likelihood of severe injury or death is high when a vehicle hits a bicyclist or pedestrian. In 2013, the bicycle crash rate for the County was 0.017 crashes per MVMT and the pedestrian crash rate was 0.014. These rates are higher than the 2012 rates. The 2013 pedestrian crash rate is higher than the historical average while the 2013 bicycle crash rate matches the historical crash rate. Work Zone Crashes Figure 19 depicts fatal work zone crashes between 2009 and 2013. MCDOT places a high priority on safety in and around work zones. There were 45 reported work zone-related crashes on MCDOT facilities in 2013. This is significantly fewer than in 2012, when 64 work zone crashes were reported. Between 2012 and 2013, the work zone related crash rate was reduced from 0.025 to 0.021, which is much lower than the historical average of 0.052 and represents the lowest rate since MCDOT began tracking this statistic. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 36 SAFETY Management System Figure 17: Fatal Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 37 SAFETY Management System Figure 17: Fatal Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 38 SAFETY Management System Figure 17: Fatal Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 39 SAFETY Management System Figure 18: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 40 SAFETY Management System Figure 18: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 41 SAFETY Management System Figure 18: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 42 SAFETY Management System Figure 19: Work Zone Crashes on County Roads 2009-2013 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 43 LOW VOLUME ROAD Management System Low Volume Road Management System Introduction MCDOT in FY 2000 initiated a formal program to pave low volume roads (LVR) in the County. A multiyear capital improvement program for paving low traffic volume unpaved roads was then created and implemented. This section documents the number and miles of unpaved LVRs that were paved by MCDOT in FY 2014. Background Prior to 2004, MCDOT paved LVRs primarily based on citizen complaints and field observations by MCDOT staff. However, beginning in 2004, MCDOT initiated a program to systematically identify low volume unpaved roads for paving. Unpaved roads with high or increasing traffic volumes, safety issues, or other significant concerns were to be considered for paving. This program was developed to specifically address unpaved roads that do not meet federal criteria for paving under the PM-10 (federal dust abatement) program. The County Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) recommended to the Board of Supervisors that an annual allocation be set aside in the MCDOT budget to pave selected LVRs. Unpaved County Road System In FY 2014, the County owned or maintained 2,466 centerline miles of roads, of which 400 miles are unpaved. These roads are located in the unincorporated parts of the County, which includes both urban or near-urban conditions as well as rural locations. There are five different types of unpaved roads in the County: 1. Roads that are owned by the County and identified as open and declared (O&D) - This means the County owns right-of-way for these segments of road and has accepted the road into the County System; 2. Roads that are partially opened and declared: These are roads where part of the right-of-way is owned by the County; 3. Primitive roads, or roads that are usually located in remote parts of the County and are accessing wilderness areas and are typically less developed than other areas; 4. Courtesy grade roads, which are existing, unpaved roads with little or no County owned right-ofway, but maintained by MCDOT through historical precedent and allowed by state statute; and 5. Unpaved roads not owned or maintained by the County. Table 7 lists the details of each of the LVRs that were paved in FY 2013 and FY 2014. Maps labeled Figure 20 show the surface type (paved or unpaved) of County roads as of FY 2014 as well as the PM-10 air quality dust abatement program boundary. Most of the unpaved County roads are outside of the PM-10 area. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 44 LOW VOLUME ROAD Management System Table 7: Low Volume Roads Completed in 2013 and 2014 Road Name From To Length (feet) Projects Completed in FY 2013 Galveston Street 43rd Avenue Choppo Road 45th Avenue Dusty Lane Monterey Street 486 45th Avenue Monterey Street Ivanhoe Street 667 45th Ave Avenue Ivanhoe Street Ivanhoe Street 528 Choppo Road Dusty Lane 43rd Avenue 697 Dusty Lane Galveston Street Choppo Road 798 Galveston Street Dusty Lane 43rd Avenue 1,197 Ivanhoe Street 45th Avenue End Road 1,232 Monterey Street 45th Avenue End Road 930 17th Avenue Maddock Road Joy Ranch Road 2,640 Sabrosa Drive New River Road 530' West of New River Road 1080' North of Honda Bow Road 6th Street 2,930 Perdiz Drive 16th Street New River Road Cavalry Road 582 560 1,525 Watkins Street Saddle Mountain Road Airport Rd Road 825' North of Cavalry Road 675' North of Saddle Mountain Road 203rd Avenue 2,460 Jomax Road 207th Avenue 203rd Avenue 2,615 203rd Avenue Mitchell Road (207th Avenue) 191st Avenue Jomax Road Morning Star Lane Bradley Road Radford Road 1,240 Jomax Road Roadrunner Road 1,270 Roadrunner Road 193rd Avenue 191st Avenue 1,320 22nd Street 7th Avenue Cavalry Road TOTAL MILES = Notes Project T423 - Completed April 2013 Project T397 - Completed May 2013 Project T409 'A' - Completed June 2013 825 730 Project T409 'B' - Completed June 2013 425 Project T409 'C' - Completed June 2013 4.86 Projects Completed in FY 2014 105th Street Circle Mountain Road McKellips Road Jensen Street I-17 Frontage Road 103rd Street McKellips Road 1,277 End of Maintenance 1,239 105th Street 1,285 TOTAL MILES = STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Project T410 - Completed June 2014 0.72 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 45 LOW VOLUME ROAD Management System Figure 20: Road Surface Types as of 2014 Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 46 LOW VOLUME ROAD Management System Figure 20: Road Surface Types as of 2014 Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 47 LOW VOLUME ROAD Management System Figure 20: Road Surface Types as of 2014 Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 48 BRIDGE Management System Bridge Management System Introduction As of April 2014, the County maintains and inspects a total of 418 structures on public roads. By the Federal Highway Administration definition, 279 of these structures are qualified to be called “bridges”, meaning the structure has a length greater than 20 feet and is qualified to receive federal aid for its maintenance. The remaining 139 are called “minor” structures with lengths of 20 feet or less. Data Gathering and Analysis “Bridges” and “Minor” Structures Every structure (bridge and minor) within MCDOT’s jurisdiction is inspected in accordance with the FHWA’s National Bridge Inspection Standards Recording and Coding Guide. This procedure allows MCDOT to maintain thorough, consistent records on each bridge and structure in the County system. The decision to maintain and inspect all of MCDOT’s structures enables MCDOT to include minor structures when considering how best to appropriate funds and prioritize in-house projects. Due to the comprehensive data MCDOT maintains on all structures, MCDOT is readily able to evaluate its inventory as a whole for both bridges and minor structures. Summary of FY 2014 Structures Total number of structures in inventory: Number of Federal Structures: Number of Non-Federal Structures: Number of bridges: Number of culverts: 418 279 139 78 340 Total number of new structures added to the inventory this year: 1 Total number of federal structures added to the inventory this year: 1 231st Avenue RCB 0.25 miles north of Patton Road (Peak View Ranch TC 20040379) 11327 Total number of non-federal structures added to the inventory this year: 0 Total number of structure replacements made this year: 0 Total number of structures removed/annexed from the inventory this year: 1 Southern Avenue RCB 0.5 miles east of Crismon Road – Structure Number 990222 Number of scour critical bridges in the MCDOT Structure Inventory: 1 Gilbert Road Bridge over the Salt River - Structure Number 7780 Number of fracture critical bridges in the MCDOT Structure Inventory: 1 Old US 80 Bridge over the Gila River - Structure Number 8021 Evaluation Criteria In 1997, the County Bridge Investment Study (BIS) recognized the need to evaluate bridges separately from road projects. The following information identifies MCDOT’s method of scoring and prioritizing bridge projects. The following categories of bridge projects were chosen for evaluation and prioritization: STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 49 BRIDGE Management System 1. Replacement Projects; 2. Replacement of Dip Sections with New Structures; 3. Scour Protection Projects; and 4. New Bridge Projects (not included in major road projects). A bridge should be considered for replacement if all of the following conditions are met: 1. The cost of rehabilitation is 50% or more than the cost of a new bridge; and 2. The Bridge Engineer agrees replacement is justifiable. Recommendations for TIP Programming Procedures Each year, MCDOT reviews the highest rated bridge projects from the following subcategories: 1. TIP Projects; 2. Replacement of Existing Bridges; 3. Replace Dip Sections with New Structures; and 4. New Bridge Projects (not included in major road projects). In any given year, the budget allocation may not support inclusion of all top rated bridge projects in the TIP Program. When this occurs, decisions are made based on the rating criteria and professional engineering judgment. Current Status of the MCDOT Bridge Management System The MCDOT Bridge Management System is up-to-date, complete, and meets or exceeds all current Federal National Bridge Inspection Standards. The MCDOT Bridge Management System is included in the ADOT AASHTOWare BrM electronic database. Asset Management for Structures In 2002, MCDOT began an Asset Management program for its structure inventory. Through FY 2014, MCDOT’s structure inventory asset valuation is estimated at approximately $139 million and consists of 279 bridges and 139 minor structures. In FY 2014, there was one new bridge added to and one minor structure removed from the MCDOT structure inventory. Federal Funding Eligibility Comparisons Structures Eligible for Federal Replacement Funds (Sufficiency Rating (SR) < 50) The Bridge Sufficiency Rating (BSR) is a rating based on multiple technical factors that measure how well a bridge performs its intended duty. Ratings range from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest. The FHWA guidelines stipulate that when a bridge’s sufficiency rating falls below a score of 50, the bridge becomes eligible for Federal replacement funds. As of July 2014, the County had no structures with a rating below 50. Structures Eligible for Federal Rehabilitation Funds (SR between 50 and 80) As a general rule of thumb, if a BSR falls between a score of 50 and 80, the bridge/structure is a good candidate for federal rehabilitation funds. Currently, there are twenty-four structures in MCDOT’s inventory that have sufficiency ratings between 50 and 80. After each inspection cycle, the Bridge Engineer pays specific attention to all structures that showed a significant change in the sufficiency rating (ten points or more) from the previous year in order to determine what caused the change. Remedial action is taken as necessary. Table 8 lists the bridges in MCDOT’s inventory that have sufficiency ratings between 50 and 80. It also indicates if a structure has a deficiency, meaning that it is considered either functionally obsolete (not built to current standards) or structurally deficient (has a defect that requires attention). STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 50 BRIDGE Management System Table 8: Structures with Sufficiency Ratings between 50 and 80 Structure No Structure Name Feature Carried by Structure Olive Ave Avenue RCB Deficiency Sufficiency Rating - 80.00 10516 Olive Avenue 9825 Carefree Hwy Highway WB Cave Creek Bridge - 79.92 990276 Olive Avenue Olive Ave Avenue RCB - 79.79 7780 Gilbert Road-FAS 229 Salt River Bridge - 79.72 10061 Old US 80 Arlington Valley Wash RCB - 78.85 11009 Olive Avenue & BNSFRR Reems Road Channel RCB Functional 78.38 9859 Camelback Road Agua Fria River Bridge - 77.63 9145 Indian School Road Agua Fria River Bridge - 77.56 9126 Bell Road Drainage Ditch RCB - 76.92 9289 91st Avenue RID Canal RCB - 76.76 990158 Camelback Road Agua Fria Drain RCB - 76.63 9927 Power Road RWCD Canal Bridge - 76.20 9928 Power Road East Maricopa Floodway - 76.20 990164 Cotton Lane Drainage Ditch RCB - 75.38 9375 Broadway Rd Road EB Tempe Canal Bridge EB Functional 75.27 9384 Broadway Rd Road WB Tempe Canal Bridge WB Functional 75.27 8553 Alma School Road Salt River Bridge NB - 74.68 8554 Alma School Road Salt River Bridge SB - 74.68 9503 Higley Road RWCD Canal Bridge - 73.49 10405 Anthem Way Anthem Way RCB - 73.26 990143 Sun Valley PkwyParkwayWash RCB 29 - 70.67 990169 El Mirage Road Drainage Ditch RCB - 67.67 8570 RH Johnson Boulevard Drainage Ditch RCB - 65.72 8021 Old US 80 Gila River Bridge - 60.58 Figure 21 shows the trends from FY 2012 - FY 2014 with respect to the number of structures that have sufficiency rates less than 80. Maps labeled Figure 22 show the location and bridge sufficiency rating of all MCDOT structures. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 51 BRIDGE Management System FY 2012 - FY 2014 Comparison of Structures with Sufficiency Ratings Less than 80 Number of Structures 25 24 23 24 23 22 22 21 20 2012 2013 2014 Fiscal Year Figure 21: FY 2012 - FY 2014 Comparison of Structures with Sufficiency Rating Less than 80 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 52 BRIDGE Management System Figure 22: 2014 Bridge Sufficiency Ratings Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 53 BRIDGE Management System Figure 22: 2014 Bridge Sufficiency Ratings Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 54 BRIDGE Management System Figure 22: 2014 Bridge Sufficiency Ratings Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 55 BRIDGE Management System Notable FY 2014 Bridge Events Bridge Inspector Certification MCDOT bridge engineering staff completed required certification training in compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, 23 CRF 650, Subpart C and the ADOT Bridge Inspection Guidelines, 2011. Two staff members attended a two-week, FHWAapproved comprehensive bridge inspection course and both passed the required exam to become a certified Bridge Inspector. The three staff members who were already certified Bridge Inspectors attended a National Highway Institute three-day refresher bridge inspection course and passed the exams required in order to maintain their inspection credentials. Miller Road Bridge The completion of the Miller Road Bridge widening project was the most notable accomplishment during FY 2014. The structural improvements made to the bridge increased its load-carrying capacity, provided improved pedestrian crossing accommodations, and provided additional width to accommodate the future widening of Miller Road. Northern Parkway Program – Phase I MCDOT managed the design and construction of three new overpass bridges and one reinforced box culvert that were completed in FY 2014 as Phase I of a 20-year multi-phase Northern Parkway Program in partnership with MAG, El Mirage, Glendale, and Peoria. In the next phase of this project, two additional overpass bridges should be completed by FY 2016. The MCDOT Bridge Group conducted initial inspections and inventories of the structures upon completion of Phase I. In accordance with the IGA terms, Glendale will eventually take over ownership and maintenance responsibilities of all of the structures constructed along Northern Parkway upon final acceptance and conveyance of rights-of-way. Synopsis of MCDOT’s Bridge Projects Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013 - FY 2017 TIP Currently, MCDOT has eight bridge and structure projects in the TIP. These projects include bridge project scoping and new bridge designs. Table 9 provides a list of these projects currently in the TIP. Table 9: Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013 - FY 2017 TIP Feature Facility/Facilities Current Improvement Stage Bridge Replacement Final Design Construction Location Salt River Gilbert Road Bridge At Salt River BID Canal Miller Road Bridge At BID Canal Salt River Dobson Road, McKellips Road, At Salt River and Gilbert Road Bridges Design Concept Report (DCR) Salt River 75th Avenue Bridge Initial Scoping Loop 101 Northern Avenue Parkway Over Loop 101 south of current Northern Construction Phase II Overpass at Loop 101 Ave Loop 101 interchange Agua Fria River Reems Road and Litchfield Road Dysart Road At Salt River Northern Avenue Parkway Bridge Northern Avenue Parkway Overpasses Northern Parkway between Dysart Rd and 111th Avenue Northern Ave at Reems Road and Litchfield Road intersections Dysart Road Overpass at Northern Ave Dysart Road at Northern Avenue STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Construction Construction Design FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 56 BRIDGE Management System The status of the Bridge/Structure work completed in FY 2014 is shown in Table 10. The bridges anticipated to be under construction in FY 2015 are shown in Table 11 below. Table 10: New Bridges and Bridge Improvements Completed in FY 2014 Structure No. 8021 Project Location Old US80 at the Gila River Description of Work Completed Bridge rehabilitation and erosion control project completed 9593 Miller Road at the BWCDD Canal Bridge replacement and widening completed N/A Northern Parkway at Sarival Avenue WB Grade separation overpass completed N/A Northern Parkway at Sarival Avenue EB Grade separation overpass completed N/A Northern Parkway at the BNSF Spur Track Bridge completed N/A Northern Parkway at the 135th Avenue Drainage Channel New RCB completed Table 11: Bridges Anticipated to Be Under Construction by MCDOT in FY 2015 Structure No. N/A Project Location Description of Work Northern Parkway at Reems Road New overpass under construction N/A Northern Parkway at Litchfield Road New overpass under construction Status of Bridge and Structure Projects Currently Being Designed There are currently nine bridge projects in various stages of design by MCDOT as well as numerous structure projects within private developments in the design phase. Table 12 lists the bridge projects currently under design or in the Design Concept Report (DCR) or scoping process. Table 12: Projects Currently in the Design Phase by MCDOT Name Facility Status Deer Valley Road Bridge Agua Fria River Construction Plans in progress Dobson Road Bridge and McKellips Road Bridge Salt River DCR completed Gilbert Road Bridge Salt River Identified for Replacement 75th Avenue Bridge Salt River Initial Scoping in progress Northern Parkway/Loop 101 Parkway Overpass Design in progress Northern Parkway Overpass Overpass at Dysart Road Design finalized Northern Parkway Bridge Agua Fria River Design in progress Eagle Eye Road Bridge Tiger Wash Bridge Selection Report completed Meridian Road Bridge Queen Creek Wash DCR completed Rittenhouse Road Bridge Queen Creek Wash Bridge Selection Report completed Summary of Inspection Activity for FY 2014 Each year MCDOT must submit a report to the County Board of Supervisors concerning the physical condition of its bridges and minor structures as compared to the adopted criteria as required by the Governments Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 34. The latest ratings of the County’s bridges and structures along with the BSR are shown below in Table 13: STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 57 BRIDGE Management System Table 13: Summary of FY 2014 Inspection Results Criteria Target Value Actual Value % of Bridges and Structures with BSR > 70 min. 90% 98.8% % of Bridges and Structures with BSR < 50 max. 3% 0.0% Table 14 through Table 17 provide a list of County bridges based on their overall length. The tables include information on each structure’s sufficiency rating. An alphabetical list of all structures within the MCDOT Bridge inventory can be found in Appendix A. Table 14: Listing of Span Bridges Over 600’ in Overall Length Structure No. Road Location Feature Intersected 8584 Tuthill Rd 0.5 mi S/ Beloat Rd 9859 8021 Camelback Rd Old US 80 1.0 mi E/ El Mirage Rd Agua Fria River S/ Gillespie Dam Gila River 9145 8981 7819 Indian School Rd 0.5 mi E/ El Mirage Olive Ave 0.8 mi E/ El Mirage Rd Gilbert Rd-FAS 0.5 mi N/ Thomas Rd 229 Happy Valley 1.5 mi W/Lake Pkwy Pleasant Rd MC-85 Hwy 0.5 mi W/ El Mirage 8553 Alma School Rd 300' S/ McKellips 7780 10396 Sufficiency Length Rating (ft.) Gila River Structure Name 96.18 1,770 Gila River Bridge 77.63 60.58 1,725 Agua Fria River Bridge 1,662 Gila River Bridge Agua Fria River Agua Fria River 77.56 92.74 1,623 Agua Fria River Bridge 1,504 Agua Fria River Bridge Salt River 79.72 1,302 Salt River Bridge Agua Fria River 88.34 1,256 Agua Fria River Bridge Agua Fria River Salt River (N. Channel) 93.94 1,203 Agua Fria River Bridge 74.68 936 Salt River Bridge NB Table 15: Listing of Span Bridges between 300’ and 600’ in Overall Length Structure No. Road Location Feature Intersected Structure Name 99.65 486 Hassayampa River Bridge 92.63 480 Blue Point Bridge 74.68 410 Salt River Bridge SB 10106 New River Road at Blue Point-Salt River Salt River Salt River (S. 0.25 mi N/ McLellan Channel) 0.25 mi E/ I 17 New River 96.61 407 New River Bridge 10085 10021 I-17 Frontage Rd 1000' S/ New River Rd New River New River Rd 0.25 mi W/ 7th Ave Skunk Creek 99.59 98.66 401 367 New River Bridge Skunk Creek Bridge 9825 Carefree Hwy WB 1 mi W/ Cave Creek Rd Cave Creek Wash 79.92 354 10162 Carefree Hwy EB 1 mi W/ Cave Creek Rd Cave Creek Wash 84.78 354 9588 Olive Avenue 82.69 302 Cave Creek Bridge Cave Creek Wash Bridge New River Bridge 9999 Old US 80 500' E/ Salome Hwy 9849 Bush Hwy 8554 Alma School Rd E/ of 99th Ave Hassayampa River Sufficiency Length Rating (ft.) New River STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 58 BRIDGE Management System Table 16: Listing of Span Bridges between 100’ and 300’ in Overall Length Structure No. 10582 Road Gavilan Peak Pkwy Location Feature Intersected Sufficiency Length Rating (ft.) Just S of Daisy Mtn Dr Deadman Wash 94.08 270 Structure Name Gavilan Peak Pkwy Bridge 7548 571st Ave 9.75 mi N/ I-8 via ACRd Gila River 98.88 257 9928 Power Rd S/ Guadalupe Rd East Maricopa Fldwy 76.20 226 10083 Cline Creek Wash 99.67 221 Sarival Avenue 100.00 203 Sarival Ave OP EB Sarival Avenue 100.00 201 Sarival Ave OP WB Queen Creek 81.41 193 Queen Creek Bridge 11108 New River Road 350' N/ Circle Mtn Rd Northern at Sarival Avenue Parkway Northern at Sarival Avenue Parkway .2 mi S/ Queen Creek Power Road Rd Riggs Rd .2 mi E of Hawes Rd E Maricopa Fldwy Bridge Cline Creek Bridge Sonoqui Wash 97.22 191 Riggs Rd Bridge 8038 Rittenhouse Rd .25 mi N/ Cloud Queen Creek Wash 85.54 180 Queen Creek Wash Bridge 8862 University Drive .5 mi E/ Ellsworth Rd CAP Canal 98.58 146 CAP Canal Bridge 8884 Southern Ave BNSF Spur Track .6mi E/ Signal Butte Rd CAP Canal (Mesa) 97.41 145 CAP Canal Bridge at BNSF Railroad Northern Parkway 99.44 144 BNSF OP 11160 11161 10390 11164 Gila River Bridge 9832 Salome Rd 8 mi W/ Harquahala Valley Rd CAP Canal 94.46 124 CAP Canal Bridge 8569 8856 Patton Rd Crismon Rd 1 mi W/ Grand Ave 500' N/ Apache Rd CAP Canal CAP Canal 94.08 94.70 119 109 CAP Canal Bridge CAP Canal Bridge 9895 Ellsworth Rd .25 mi N/ University Rd CAP Canal 99.25 106 CAP Canal Bridge 97.09 105 CAP Canal Bridge 91.01 103 MC-85 Bridge FanninMcFar CAP Aqueduct 9824 Bush Hwy 1.7 mi N/ Thomas 10230 MC-85 Hwy .3 mi E/ Estrella Pkwy Bullard Wash STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 59 BRIDGE Management System Table 17: Listing of Span Bridges Under 100’ in Overall Length Structure No. Road 8576 355th Avenue 8571 7883 8560 8881 10061 9834 7898 10787 9949 9927 10786 7901 8000 7557 9375 9384 10776 9503 9919 10051 8001 10126 8044 9593 7582 8638 10847 8043 7551 Feature Sufficiency Length Location Intersected Rating (ft.) Structure Name 7 mi N/ Indian School Rd CAP Canal 95.79 90 CAP Canal Bridge HaydenRhodes 163rd Avenue 5 mi N/ US 60_Grand Ave 93.80 88 CAP Canal Bridge CAP Aqueduct Colter Channel Dysart Rd-FAS 547 0.25 mi N/ Camelback Rd Colter Channel 98.41 86 Bridge Eagle Eye Rd 2 mi S/ Salome Hwy CAP Canal 96.88 86 CAP Canal Bridge Van Buren St 0.5 mi W/ Citrus Rd RID Canal 98.43 85 RID Canal Bridge Arlington Valley Arlington Valley Old US 80 0.3 mi S/ 331th Ave 78.85 84 Wash Bridge Buckeye Drain Old US 80 1 mi W/ Jct SR-85 Buckeye Drain 98.65 82 Bridge 1.5 mi N/32nd St/Cloud Cave Creek Pkwy Wash 98.84 80 Wash Bridge Rd Beardsley Dysart Road Dysart Road 0.25 mi. S/ Jomax Rd 99.99 76 Canal Bridge El Mirage Drain El Mirage Rd 0.5 mi N/ Glendale Ave Dysart Drain 97.41 73 Bridge RWCD Canal N. RWCD Canal (N) Power Rd S/ Guadalupe Rd 76.20 69 Crossing) Bridge 0.4 mi. N/ Happy Valley Beardsley El Granada Blvd El Granada Blvd 99.99 65 Rd Canal Bridge Buckeye Canal MC 85 Hwy 0.5 mi W/ Perryville Buckeye Canal 97.26 56 Bridge Buckeye Canal Baseline Rd 200' NW MC-85 Buckeye Canal 93.68 56 Bridge Bulldog Bulldog Fldwy Meridian Rd 0.5 mi N/ Brown Rd 97.37 54 Floodway Bridge Tempe Canal Broadway Rd EB 0.2 mi E/ Price Rd Tempe Canal 75.27 50 Bridge EB Tempe Canal Broadway Rd WB 0.2 mi E/ Price Rd Tempe Canal 75.27 50 Bridge WB 0.5 mi S/ Southern Rainbow Road Rainbow Road Buckeye Canal 98.23 48 Avenue Bridge RWCD Canal Higley Rd 0.5 mi S/ Germann RWCD Canal 73.49 44 Bridge Gila Bend Canal Woods Rd E/ Old US-80 Gila Bend Canal 98.43 44 Bridge Desert Lk Wash Desert Lake 7th St 450' N/ Carefree Hwy 98.34 44 S Branch S/Branch Airport Rd 0.5 mi N/ Lower Buckeye RID Canal 94.71 43 RID Canal Bridge Buckeye Canal Airport Rd 1 mi N/ MC85 Buckeye Canal 98.61 42 Bridge Buckeye Canal Perryville Rd 0.5 mi N/ Southern Buckeye Canal 98.86 40 Bridge Buckeye Canal Miller Rd 0.25 mi N/ SR-85 Buckeye Canal 86.34 40 Bridge Buckeye Canal 309th Avenue S of Lower River Rd Buckeye Canal 94.95 39 Bridge Buckeye Canal Dean Rd 0.75 mi N/ MC-85 Buckeye Canal 98.82 39 Bridge Power Line Meridian Rd Meridian Rd (Mesa) 0.5 mi S of Warner Road 93.10 39 Fldwy Chnl Bridge Perryville Rd 1/3 mi S/ Van Buren RID Canal 98.72 38 RID Canal Bridge Dean Rd 600' N/ Lower Buckeye Rd RID Canal 98.72 37 RID Canal Bridge STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 60 BRIDGE Management System Structure No. Road Location Feature Intersected 7782 Palo Verde Rd 0.75 mi N/ Old US80 Hwy Buckeye Canal 9672 99th Ave 0.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd RID Canal 9831 Jackrabbit Trail 1000' N/ Southern Ave Buckeye Canal 9374 University Dr 900' W/ Dobson Tempe Canal 10088 8583 Jackrabbit Trail 59th Ave 0.25 mi N/ Yuma 0.5 mi S/ Buckeye Rd RID Canal RID Canal 8629 Turner Rd 0.5 mi S/ Baseline Rd Buckeye Canal 8681 Rainbow Rd 10239 Roeser Rd 10240 Chambers Street 1 mi N/ Broadway 0.5 mi S/ Broadway Rd 0.6 mi S/ Broadway Rd RID Canal Buckeye Feeder Ditch Buckeye Feeder Ditch 8578 Wilson (283rd) Ave 1 mi S/ Baseline 11111 Centennial Rd 9426 8680 Palo Verde Rd Johnson Rd 5.7 mi W/ Harqua. Val. Rd 0.25 mi N/ Broadway 0.25 mi N/ Broadway 8855 Bruner Rd 990181 Old US 80 Sufficiency Length Rating (ft.) Structure Name Buckeye Canal 98.70 37 Bridge 97.24 37 RID Canal Bridge Buckeye Canal 98.31 37 Bridge Tempe Canal 95.40 36 Bridge 97.32 35 RID Canal Bridge 97.15 34 RID Canal Bridge Buckeye Canal 99.88 34 Bridge 98.49 34 RID Canal Bridge 93.83 34 93.84 34 Buckeye Canal 98.65 32 CAP Aux Canal 94.90 32 RID Canal RID Canal 98.22 98.86 31 28 0.75 mi N/ Old US-80 Buckeye Canal 98.99 28 0.25 mi S/ Cactus Rose Arlington Valley Wash 83.84 18 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Roeser Rd Bridge Chambers St Bridge Buckeye Canal Bridge Centennial Rd Bridge RID Canal Bridge RID Canal Bridge Buckeye Canal Bridge Arlington V Wash Bridge FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 61 ROAD Management System Road Management System Introduction Pavement maintenance is broadly identified as work accomplished to preserve or extend the functional life of a pavement surface until major rehabilitation or complete reconstruction is performed. Maintenance is classified by function as either routine or preventive. Preventive maintenance preserves rather than improves the capacity or strength of the pavement. In order for preventive maintenance to be effective, it should be applied to structurally sound pavement before the pavement displays significant environmental distress such as raveling, oxidation and block cracking. Timely treatments prove to be the most cost effective. Routine maintenance more typically consists of pothole repair, patching, sweeping and/or striping of pavement. All roads deteriorate over time due to environmental conditions and the volume and type of traffic using the road. However, the roads within the jurisdiction of MCDOT are maintained at a high level of service because of a County program that includes the following procedures:  Continuously monitor and evaluate road conditions – road evaluation ratings are stored in the Road Management System (RMS) database;  Report road conditions to decision makers via annual reports;  Model pavement conditions and maintenance strategies; and  Develop annual and long-term maintenance plans and implement the plans as funding permits. Summary of MCDOT Paved Facilities In 2014 MCDOT had jurisdiction of 915 miles (1,872 lane miles) of local roads and 1,086 miles (2,600 lane miles) of major roads (arterial and collector). This breakdown can be seen in Table 18 and Figure 23, which compare the MCDOT road composition between FY 2010 and FY 2014. In total, MCDOT owned and maintained 2,001 centerline miles of local and major roads in FY 2014, which equates to 4,471.50 lane miles. For comparison, in FY 2013, MCDOT maintained 4,469.50 lane miles of road. Table 18: Miles of MCDOT Paved Roads FY 2010 - FY 2014 FY Road Classification FY 2010 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Difference 2010-2014 Local 884 8898 910 912 915 31 Minor Collector 390 389 390 315 314 -76 Major Collector 282 274 272 266 266 -16 Minor Arterial 376 359 358 342 342 -34 Principal Arterial 126 158 164 164 164 38 2,058 2,070 2,094 1,999 2,001 -57 TOTAL STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 62 ROAD Management System Miles of Paved Roads FY 2010 - FY 2015 1,000 900 800 700 M i l e s 600 Local 500 Minor Collector 400 Major Collector Minor Arterial 300 Principal Arterial 200 100 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fiscal Year Figure 23: Miles of Paved Roads owned by MCDOT (FY 2010 - FY 2014) Road and Pavement Evaluation Ratings The following section describes the type of pavement evaluations and ratings that are conducted as part of MCDOT’s routine pavement maintenance. Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR) The Road Management Section evaluates pavement conditions for surface distress every 12-18 months for arterial and collector roads and every other year for local roads, with half of the local roads evaluated each year. The resulting ratings range from 0 to 100 with 100 being new pavement or pavement with no distress. The results help to quantify the overall pavement condition of the road network. The consistently positive results of implementing preventive maintenance on MCDOT roads is evident in Figure 24, which shows the FY 2009-2014 PCR quality by percentage ranking of all arterial roads in the County, and maps labeled Figure 25, which show the PCR for every County road. The PCR data is also presented as part of the Annual Network Rating Summary, which is found later in this Section. MCDOT utilizes the PCR ratings to forecast preventive maintenance programs and TIP planning. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 63 ROAD Management System FY 2009 - FY 2014 Arterial Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR) P e r c e n t o f 100% S y s t e m 90% 80% 70% 60% 59% 57% 57% 41% 40% 35% 30% 20% 10% 48% 48% 50% 39% 32% 25% 24% 18% 21% 18% 2% 1% FY 2009 FY 2010 17% 16% 19% 19% 1% 1% 2% FY 2011 FY 2012 Fiscal Year FY 2013 FY 2014 1% 0% Excellent (100-85) Very Good (84-70) Good (69-55) Fair (54-40) Poor (<40) Figure 24: FY 2009 - FY 2014 PCRs for Arterial County Roads STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 64 ROAD Management System Figure 25: FY 2014 PCR for County Roads Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 65 ROAD Management System Figure 25: FY 2014 PCR for County Roads Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 66 ROAD Management System Figure 25: FY 2014 PCR for County Roads Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 67 ROAD Management System International Roughness Index (IRI) MCDOT uses a Laser Road Profiler (LRP) equipped with three lasers, one in each wheel track and one in the mid-lane, to collect IRI data. Annually, the MCDOT Road Management Section collects the IRI for each arterial road segment with a length greater than a quarter mile. The IRI values are determined for each road segment on a scale from 1 to 500 with 500 representing an extremely rough road. IRI values are categorized by performance subgroups, and the percentage of each group for the years between FY 2009 and FY 2014 can be seen in Figure 26. Maps labeled Figure 27 show the IRI for each Countyowned road. MCDOT utilizes the IRI ratings to forecast preventive maintenance programs and TIP planning. FY 2009 - FY 2014 Arterial International Roughness Index (IRI) 100% P e r c e n t o f 90% 80% S y s t e m 70% 60% 50% 38% 40% 26% 30% 20% 10% 16% 1% 27% 18% 17% 18% 1% 26% 17% 18% 15% 23% 19% 22% 13% 3% 1% 47% 42% 43% 41% 38% 14% 3% 14% 22% 15% 2% 0% FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Fiscal Year Very Smooth (0-59) Smooth (60-94) Average (95-169) Rough (170-220) Very Rough (>220) Figure 26: FY 2009 - FY 2014 IRI for County Arterial Roads STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 68 ROAD Management System Figure 27: FY 2014 IRI for County Roads Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 69 ROAD Management System Figure 27: FY 2014 IRI for County Roads Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 70 ROAD Management System Figure 27: FY 2014 IRI for County Roads Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 71 ROAD Management System Sufficiency Ratings The Road Management Section identifies a sufficiency rating for each arterial road segment when it is initially constructed. The rating identifies how well each road segment compares to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual (RDM) standards. Ratings for each category are combined per road segment and scored on a scale from 0 to 100 with 100 representing a road in compliance with the RDM standards. The sufficiency ratings of arterial roads are updated only after major improvements are made to the road or the road is reconstructed. New construction, widening, or significant improvements to address safety issues such as bottlenecks, drainage, and vertical and horizontal sight distance will all impact the road’s sufficiency rating. The Sufficiency Ratings of the MCDOT road network between FY 2009 and FY 2014 are provided in Figure 28. Maps labeled Figure 29 below show the sufficiency ratings of County roads. FY 2009 - FY 2014 Arterial Sufficiency Ratings P e r c e n t o f S y s t e m 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 34% 33% 12% 1% FY 2009 32% FY 2010 31% 12% 13% 1% FY 2011 31% 11% 1% 1% 60% 57% 57% 55% 53% 53% FY 2012 29% 11% 1% FY 2013 10% 1% FY 2014 Fiscal Year Excellent (100-85) Very Good (84-70) Good (69-55) Fair (54-40) Poor (<40) Figure 28: FY 2009 - FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Arterial Roads STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 72 ROAD Management System Figure 29: FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Roads Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 73 ROAD Management System Figure 29: FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Roads Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 74 ROAD Management System Figure 29: FY 2014 Sufficiency Ratings for County Roads Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 75 ROAD Management System Preventive Maintenance Procedures Preventive maintenance extends the life of the pavement and provides for better road performance. The majority of treatments for pavement involves sealing the existing surface and providing a new wearing surface for traffic. MCDOT has used preventive maintenance practices for decades with excellent results. Table 19 shows the breakdown of each treatment that is typically used, the frequency of application and the observed increase in pavement life per application. Table 19: Preventive Maintenance Treatment Longevity Pavement Age at Time of First Application (year) 3 to 4 Frequency of Application (year) 3 to 4 Observed Increase in Pavement Life (year) 3 to 4 Crack Filling/Sealing 8 to 10 4 to 5 4 to 5 Single Chip Seal 10 to 12 5 to 6 5 to 6 Double Chip Seal 10 to 12 5 to 6 5 to 6 Micro Surfacing 10 to 12 5 to 6 5 to 6 Slurry Seal Arterial—Thin Overlay— 1.5”- 2” Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) Local—Mill & Resurface 1.5” ARHM 10 to 12 5 to 6 5 to 6 12 to 15 12 to 15 12 35+ To be determined To be determined Treatment Fog Seal/ Rejuvenate FY 2014 Pavement Preservation Results A maintenance plan was established that identified the major projects that were needed to maintain the integrity of the MCDOT owned roads in 2014. In FY 2014, there was a projected $7 million of pavement rehabilitation projects, $6 million for arterial mill and replace (M&R), $1 million for crack sealing, $3.65 million for chip seal, $1.14 million for preservative seal, and $0.56 million for slurry seal. A summary of the completed maintenance projects in FY 2014 can be found in Table 20. The cost to complete the FY 2014 maintenance plan was approximately $12.68 million. As a comparison, MCDOT spent $7.86 million in FY 2013 to complete the FY 2013 maintenance plan. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 76 ROAD Management System Table 20: FY 2014 Completed Maintenance Plans Project Name 2014 - Profile & Asphalt Rubber (AR) Overlay Eagle Eye Rd 2014 - Crack Seal - $1.2m - MPC14 2014 - Crack Seal - $1.2m - MPC14 2014 - Chip Seal Low Volume (LV) - MPH14 $850k 2014 - Chip Seal High Volume (HV) - Article 5 $2.25m - MPH14 2014 - Preservative Seal - $700k - MPP14 2014 - Slurry Seal - MPS14 - $530k 2014 - Slurry Seal - MPS14 - $530k 2014 - Micro Slurry - MPS14 - $355k 2014 - AR M&R - TT435 - $6.9m Cost per Square Yard (SY) WO# 2014 - Chip Seal HV - Article 5 - $2.25m - MPH14 Square Yards (SY) Lane Miles Total Cost MP067 $17.66 48,885 5.95 $863,309.10 MPC13 MPC14 $0.45 $0.45 12,314 2,734,148 1.5 332.9 $5,541.20 $1,230,366.55 MPH14 $2.25 354,306 43.14 $797,187.51 MPH14 $2.50 866,742 105.53 $2,166,855.00 MPP14 MPS13 MPS14 MPS14 TT435 $0.32 $1.59 $1.59 $2.10 $10.21 1,710,090 731 331,794 106,494 603,192 208.23 0.09 40.4 12.97 73.44 $547,228.83 $1,162.46 $527,551.73 $223,638.09 $6,158,594.10 $2.48 64,991 7.91 $161,177.38 Project Maintenance Totals TTTMP032 6,833,687 832.06 $12,682,611.95 TIP Funding: $6,158,594.10 Operations Funding: $5,660,708.75 In FY 2014, MCDOT’s pavement preservation group and the Operations Division completed 11 programs this year with an expenditure of $12,682,612. Figure 30 and Figure 31 break down the FY 2014 completed projects and costs by the type of surface treatment that was performed. As can be seen in Figure 29, the most prevalent road improvement undertaken in 2014 was the crack seal, with 334 miles of road undergoing a crack seal treatment. However, the type of surface treatment that resulted in the largest cost in FY 2014 was the Asphalt Rubber (AR) Overlay, which cost MCDOT more than $7 million. This is despite the fact that there were only 79 miles of road that underwent AR Overlay treatment. FY 2014 Completed Maintenance Mileage 400 350 335 Lane Miles 300 250 208 200 150 114 100 79 43 50 40 13 0 Crack Seal Preservative Seal Chip Seal HV AR Overlay Chip Seal LV Slurry Seal Micro Slurry Surface Treatments Figure 30: FY 2014 Completed Maintenance Mileage STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 77 ROAD Management System FY 2014 Maintenance Costs $8,000,000 $7,021,903 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 Cost $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,328,032 $2,000,000 $1,235,908 $797,188 $1,000,000 $547,229 $528,714 $223,638 $0 AR Overlay Chip Seal HV Crack Seal Chip Seal LV Preservative Seal Slurry Seal Micro Slurry Surface Treatment Figure 31: FY 2014 Maintenance Costs Table 21 shows the overall Network Rating Summary for FY 2014, which shows the results of the preventive maintenance efforts by evaluating the road system’s PCR and comparing it to previous years. The results of the FY 2014 pavement preservation program show that the network is being successfully maintained. It can be seen that the effort in FY 2014 resulted in maintenance of the network, as the 2014 average PCR value remained the same as the value in FY 2013 for local and park roads (93.27 and 89.63 respectively) and the average PCR of arterials showed minimal decline (79.40 in FY 2014 from 80.67 in FY 2013). If additional funding becomes available, MCDOT can consider accelerating the preventative maintenance plans for more crack seal, slurry seal, chip seal and mill and overlay projects to improve the quality of MCDOT roads and reduce more costly maintenance in the future. Maps labeled Figure 32 show the pavement maintenance activities that have been undertaken on County roads in FY 2014. These maps also show the MCDOT-delineated maintenance areas. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 78 ROAD Management System Table 21: FY 2010 - FY 2014 Annual Network Rating Summary Fiscal Year Average PCR Average IRI Mileage PCR 100-85 PCR 84-70 PCR < 55 Miles above 70 % above 70 % below 55 2010 Fiscal Year Average PCR Mileage PCR 100-85 PCR 84-70 PCR < 55 Miles above 70 % above 70 % below 55 2010 Fiscal Year Average PCR Mileage PCR 100-85 PCR 84-70 PCR < 55 Miles above 70 % above 70 % below 55 2010 Fiscal Year Network Avg PCR Network % above 70 Network % below 55 82.39 163.09 1112.54 627.5 264.45 6.77 891.95 81.00% 1.00% 91.93 884.09 724.48 119.62 5.1 844.1 98.50% 0.60% 89.39 52.11 44.97 5.46 1.3 50.43 97.00% 3.00% Arterial 2011 81.96 157.08 1119.18 631.09 273.28 8.03 904.37 82.00% 1.00% Local 2011 92.53 897.68 751.23 103.18 5.03 854.41 98.70% 0.60% Park 2011 89.61 54.97 45.22 5.46 1.3 50.68 97.00% 3.00% Network Totals 2010 2011 86.68 86.74 87.20% 87.34% 0.64% 0.69% 2012 81.84 149.9 1123.14 517.28 387.14 12.28 904.42 83.00% 1.10% 2013 80.67 150.52 1087.43 519.82 349.61 12.36 869.43 79.90% 1.10% 2014 79.40 154.44 1084.28 438.75 423.64 17.02 862.39 79.50% 1.60% 2012 93.62 910.02 815.22 61.99 1.26 877.21 98.40% 0.10% 2013 93.26 912.27 834.21 51.98 1.24 886.19 99.00% 0.10% 2014 93.27 920.97 852.88 42.22 0 895.1 99.40% 0.00% 2012 89.63 56.54 44.97 5.46 1.3 50.43 97.50% 2.50% 2013 89.63 56.36 44.97 5.46 1.3 50.43 97.50% 2.50% 2014 89.63 58.18 44.97 5.46 1.3 50.43 97.50% 2.50% 2012 87.18 87.67% 0.71% 2013 2014 85.88 87.62% 0.89% 86.5 87.84% 0.72% Note: FY data is typically selected from June 30th or the last work day of the FY. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 79 ROAD Management System Figure 32: FY 2014 Pavement Maintenance Activities Area 1 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 80 ROAD Management System Figure 32: FY 2014 Pavement Maintenance Activities Area 2 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 81 ROAD Management System Figure 32: FY 2014 Pavement Maintenance Activities Area 3 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 82 ROAD Management System 5-Year Pavement Preservation Plan Pavement preservation plans are generated by application of the preservation strategy flow charts to the current pavement ratings in the database. Per Figure 33, in 2013 it was projected that the pavement preservation and preventative maintenance needs for the five-year period of FY 2013 - FY 2017 would be $75.6 million to keep the County road system at the then existing serviceability level. In the past two fiscal years, FY 2013 and 2014, MCDOT has completed pavement preservation and preventative maintenance projects for a total amount of $20.5 million, or 27 percent of the projected five-year expenditures. The projected needs for pavement preservation and preventative maintenance were identified to be $86.1 million for the next cycle of five fiscal years, FY 2015 to FY 2019. FY 2013 – FY 2017 FY 2013 – FY 2014 5 Yr. Projection 2013 Preservation Type Lane Miles Completed Cost Lane Miles Cost % Reconstruction Arterial AR Overlay Local M&R Chip Seal HV Chip Seal LV Slurry Seal Micro Slurry Preservative Seal Crack Seal 12.18 187.26 174.11 560.09 217.53 215.51 0.00 1,112.67 1,317.06 $2,525,000 $16,045,000 $23,410,000 $12,500,000 $4,8835,125 $4,800,000 $0 $4,812,500 $6,656,050 12.03 5.95 76.36 218.49 78.03 82.86 12.97 465.06 612.86 $2,033,167.39 $863,309.10 $6,362,242.80 $4,484,960.43 $1,442,002.34 $1,259,512.32 $223,638.09 $1,496,382.34 $2,379,316.28 81% 5% 27% 36% 3% 26% Pavement Preservation Totals: 3,907.41 $75,583,675 1,564.61 $20,544,531.09 27% 31% 36% FY 2015 – FY 2019 5 Yr. Projection Preservation Type Reconstruction Arterial AR Overlay Local M&R Hot In Place Recycling (HIPR) Nova Chip Chip Seal HV Chip Seal LV Slurry Seal Micro Slurry Preservative Seal Crack Seal Pavement Preservation Totals: Lane Miles Cost 259.30 167.52 0.00 0.00 487.03 284.31 305.61 0.00 982.71 1,278.46 $31,635,823.65 $23,388,906 $0 $0 $10,502,500 $5,950,000 $5,140,000 $0 $4,589,050 $4,900,000 3,764.94 $86,106,280 Figure 33: FY 2014 Pavement Preservation 5-Year Summary Report STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 83 ROAD Management System FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan Table 22 shows the FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan that was developed in FY 2014. Implementation of the projected maintenance plan will cost $19.3 million to apply all the recommended surface treatments and existing pavement rehabilitation. Table 22: FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan Project Name WO # Cost/SY Rehabilitation - Mesa - Phase II - Superstition Country, Broadview, Glenrose, Knolls, Palo T434 $18.50 Verde Rehabilitation - Mesa Phase I - Superstition & T434 $18.50 Var. Extended to FY 2014-15 AR M&R – McDowell Rd MP073 $13.00 AR Overlay - Meridian Rd - IGA w/Apache T468 $12.87 Junction AR Overlay - Loop 303/Northern Pkwy Area T472 $10.50 AR M& R - Arterial +1000 ADT T469/470 $12.50 AC Overlay - 2" Superpave - Germann Rd MP071 $16.60 Chip Seal LV - Meridian Rd T468 $2.50 Chip Seal - HV $2.50 Chip Seal - LV $2.00 Micro Seal – Cape Seal $2.92 Slurry Seal $1.75 Preservative Seal – Arterial $0.35 Preservative Seal - Local - TRMSS MC $0.35 Crack Seal $0.32 Pavement Preservation Totals: Lane Miles SY Needs Cost 350,000 42.62 $6,475,000 60,000 7.31 $1,110,000 31,450 3.83 $408.850 55,745 6.79 $717,438 320,700 39.05 140,396 17.09 30,675 3.73 35,000 4.26 800,000 97.41 625,000 76.10 232,574 28.32 320,000 38.96 1,300,000 158.29 771,000 93.88 2,500,000 304.40 7,131,090 922.02 TIP Funding: Operations Funding: Additional Funding Required: $3,367,350 $1,754,950 $509,205 $87,500 $2,000,000 $1,250,000 $679,116 $560,000 $455,000 $269,850 $800,000 $20,444,259 $13,512,238 $6,932,021 $0 Figure 34 and Figure 35 break down the planned FY 2015 projected maintenance projects and project costs by the type of surface treatment that will be performed. Similar to FY 2014, the 14 projects in the FY 2015 plan will result in the highest number of lane miles being treated by crack seal. However, the FY 2015 plan projects a significantly higher proportion of miles being treated by preservative seal than was seen in FY 2014. For costs, in FY 2014, the treatment that was generating the highest cost was AR Overlay. In FY 2015, the treatment with the highest projected cost is a rehabilitation project, which is estimated to cost just under $7 million. AR Overlays are the next highest costs, with projections just under $6 million. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 84 ROAD Management System FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan 350 304 300 252 Lane Miles 250 200 150 97 100 80 67 50 39 Rehabilitation Mesa Phase I & II Slurry Seal 50 0 Crack Seal Preservative Seal Chip Seal HV Chip Seal LV AR M&R Arterial Surface Treatments Figure 34: FY 2015 Pavement Preservation Plan Summary FY 2015 Estimated Maintenance Costs $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,970,000 $5,942,384 $6,000,000 Cost $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,650,000 $1,139,050 $1,000,000 $560,000 Chip Seal HV Chip Seal LV Preservative Seal Crack Seal Slurry Seal $1,000,000 $0 Rehabilitation - Mesa Phase I & II AR M&R Arterial Surface Treatments Figure 35: FY 2015 Estimated Maintenance Costs STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 85 ASSET Management System Asset Management System Introduction It is the policy of MCDOT to maintain effective internal controls to manage its infrastructure assets and maintain proper records regarding the use and disposition of those assets. There is a necessity for MCDOT to safeguard and maintain assets in order to receive the maximum benefit, comply with state and federal requirements regarding their use and disposition, and properly account for infrastructure assets for financial statement purposes. An effort is taking place to provide transparency in how MCDOT provides services within the organization and to the County’s constituents. As a result, Divisions have a better understanding of their roles in relation to the development and maintenance of an Infrastructure Inventory. Government entities were encouraged to adopt the model of GASB Statement 34, titled Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments, to be in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) by June 15, 2001. Background GASB is responsible for establishing GAAP for both state and local governments. GAAP sets the criteria that governments must follow in order to obtain a “clean opinion” from auditors. A clean opinion means one has good credit, which is very important when a state or local government wants to issue bonds, obtain financing for long-term construction projects, and obtain performance bonds. GASB approved GASB 34 in June 1999, and it was the first time government entities were required to report the value of their infrastructure assets and develop methods and procedures for Financial Management Systems. The goal of GASB 34 was to have an agency’s financial statements reflect the financial health of government entities. Governments that do not comply with GAAP might end up paying more to issue debt because the bonding agency will not be able to determine the financial health of the government entity. In addition, it would be increasingly difficult for the agency to obtain loans for capital projects because of poor bond ratings. The County has received three consecutive “adverse opinions” as a direct result of three things: the method for recording infrastructure by MCDOT and Flood Control; lack of internal controls; and the assessment of value for non-TIP-related assets. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The TIP is a collaborative effort of the Planning, Project Management and Finance Divisions. Within the TIP program, projects are identified, and budgets and timelines are created for major construction projects led by MCDOT. Projects are added to the TIP based on evaluations of scope, schedule, and budget and are presented to the TAB for recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Projects can include transportation studies, improvements to structures, traffic signals, low volume road paving and reconstruction of roads. Table 23 and Figure 36 show the results of TIP projects for FY 2014. Additionally, Figure 37 highlights the amount and percentage of each type of Asset category (Land, Roads, Traffic Signals, or Structures/Bridges) that was added to the MCDOT inventory in FY 2014. Table 23: FY 2014 TIP Summary Completed Infrastructure Preservation Non-Capital Expenses Construction In Progress 6 Projects 19 Projects 45 Projects 1 Project $5,525,107 Spent $10,714,712 Spent $12,856,157 Spent $364,215 Spent STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 86 ASSET Management System FY 2014 TIP Disposition $364,215 Completed Infrastructure Projects (6) $5,525,107 $12,856,157 Preservation Projects (19) $10,714,712 Non Capital Expenses (45) Construction in Progress (1) Figure 36: FY 2014 TIP Disposition FY 2014 County Assets Added by Percentage 5% 8% Land $28,894,945 Roads $11,610,213 25% 62% Traffic Signals $2,317,413 Structures/Bridges $3,856,131 Figure 37: FY 2014 MCDOT Assets Added by Percentage Not all of the projects result in additions to the MCDOT Infrastructure Inventory. Some are expensed while others can be a part of an IGA where MCDOT recoups funds that are expended and a municipality STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 87 ASSET Management System assumes jurisdiction over the completed project. The future ownership/jurisdiction is typically identified through IGAs. Once a project is complete, MCDOT staff prepares correspondence to the contractor and internally to relevant MCDOT staff that the project is complete and accepted into MCDOT Inventory. There is a oneyear warranty period for newly completed project during which contractors are obligated to make any repairs as required by MCDOT. Real Estate The Real Estate Division is responsible for Property Management, Acquisitions, and Property Engineering. The Real Estate Division plays an important role by providing the detailed account of land rights dispositions associated with MCDOT projects. All land rights activity is validated by resolutions, deeds, or approval by the Board of Supervisors and is referenced within the Real Estate database. While much of this Division’s activity is associated with acquisitions of right-of-way for TIP projects and Flood Control Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), the Real Estate Division also processes municipal annexations, road declarations, road abandonment, and excess land sales. The Division also maintains the records and documentation of these activities. The Board of Supervisors authorizes Transportation and Flood Control projects by adopting resolutions that authorize the departments to spend money to acquire right-of-way and to construct and maintain projects. These projects are then added to the Asset Management Inventory. In FY 2014, the County added a net $26.9 million in land assets to the County Infrastructure Inventory ($28.9 Million in additions and $2 million in deletions). As seen in Figure 38, the most common means for adding to County Assets has been through purchasing it through the TIP; 54 percent of the additional land added to the MCDOT Inventory was acquired this way. The primary means of land asset reduction to MCDOT’s Inventory in 2014 came from annexation of roads by other municipalities, as shown in Figure 39. Land Assets Acquired By MCDOT in FY 2014 $15,400,447.53 $16,000,000 $13,000,104.00 $14,000,000 Land Asset Value $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $83,744.00 $2,000,000 $0 FY14 TIP LAND FY14 DEDICATIONS FY14 SUBDIVISIONS New MCDOT Land Assets Figure 38: FY 2014 Land Assets Acquired by MCDOT STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 88 ASSET Management System Land Asset Reductions in FY 2014 $1,310,745 $1,400,000 Deleted Asset Value $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $599,328 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $64,073 $17 $0 FY14 ABANDONMENTS FY14 ROADWAY LAND ANNEX FY14 TRANSFER FY14 ANNEXATIONS Deleted MCDOT Land Assets Figure 39: FY 2014 Land Asset Reductions Traffic Signals Traffic signals are either part of a TIP project or acquired via O&D subdivisions of a private development. When part of a TIP project, a signal light is added into the MCDOT Inventory on the date that it is switched on; a designated MCDOT employee then provides a letter of completion. Traffic signals added by subdivision O&D are done so after the Board of Supervisors approves the development’s acceptance into MCDOT Inventory and the signal is subsequently turned on. Deletions of traffic signals from the inventory list occur via municipal annexation of a road associated with a signal. Structures The Structure Division’s primary responsibilities are the design and safety of the structures throughout the County. State and Federal Mandates require MCDOT to track and inspect 407 structures; however, not all 407 structures are included in the Infrastructure Management System. Inclusion in the Infrastructure Management System can occur in one of two ways: as a project in the TIP; or as an O&D. TIP projects are scoped, designed and managed by MCDOT, and the structures’ values are determined by their actual costs. Structures acquired via an O&D process are mostly from O&D subdivisions and are valued based on current unit cost calculation (updated every two years). Until a more effective system is implemented, a coordinated effort between Development Services, Structures, Project Management and Planning is needed to identify and extract information for inclusion into the Asset Management System. Because the Structures Division reports on a Federal Year End, it is important that the time parameters are clearly outlined for staff. Timing is particularly important when annexations occur. STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 89 Appendix Appendix A – Alphabetical Listing of All Structures in the MCDOT Bridge Inventory Structure No. 10050 10051 10553 8583 9289 10444 990151 990153 9666 9672 990154 9677 990234 9678 9679 990257 990280 10783 990265 10368 7561 990202 10552 10554 10555 10556 990203 990204 10849 10850 8571 11109 7582 8576 7548 990156 8001 10126 7549 8553 8554 990117 990187 10405 990230 990228 990227 990229 990231 990232 990250 990258 990259 10551 990184 10163 Road 007th St 007th St 012th Street 059th Ave 091st Ave 096th Street 099th Ave 099th Ave 099th Ave 099th Ave 103th Ave NB 105th Ave 105th Place 106th Ave 107th Ave 107th Avenue 116th Street 117th Avenue 119th Avenue 129th Avenue 138th Ave 141st Ave 144th St-Rio Verde 144th St-Rio Verde 144th St-Rio Verde 144th St-Rio Verde 145th Drive 147th Drive 150th Street 150th Street 163rd Avenue 203rd Place 309th Avenue 355th Avenue 571st Ave_AguaCal 571st Ave_AguaCalR Airport Rd Airport Rd Aleppo Drive Alma School Rd Alma School Rd Alma School Rd Amigo Dr (SCW) Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Anthem Way Aurora Dr Avondale Blvd Location 0.2 mi N/ 7th St/Carefree 450' N/ Carefree Hwy N of Circle Mtn Rd 0.5 mi S/ Buckeye Rd at McDowell Rd 1/8 mi N/ Broadway Road 200' N/ Grand at Concho Circle 250' N Grand Ave 0.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 325' N/ Olive at Del Webb Blvd Median Quarterline Rd to Contess at Del Webb Blvd Median at Del Webb Blvd Median 0.5 mi. N of Williams Rd 600' S of Riggs Rd 620' S/ Agua Fria Blvd 0.5 mi s/ Williams Drive N/ Camelback Rd 200' W/ Camino del Sol 200' W/ Yosemite Dr 120' S of Dixileta Dr 350' S of Peakview Rd 1250' S of Dixileta Dr at Windstone Trail 200' W/ Yosemite Dr 200' N/ Antelope 765' N of Rio Verde Drive 1610' N of Rio Verde Dr 5 mi N/ US 60_Grand Ave S of Lower River Rd 7 mi N/ Indian School Rd 9.75 mi N/ I-8 via ACRd 8.5 mi N/ I-8 via AguaCal 0.5 mi N/ Lower Buckeye 1 mi N/ MC85 200' N/136th Dr_W/SpnGrdn 300' S/ McKellips 0.25 mi N/ McLellan 0.5 mi S/ Riggs Rd at Stardust Blvd Median East of I-17 350' W/ Anthem Club Dr 475' E/ Venture Court 530' E/ Navigation Way 200' W of Anthem Club Dr 220' E/ Freedom Way .25 mi W/ Daisy Mtn Dr 370' NW of LibertyBellWay 0.53 mi E/ Daisy Mtn Dr 0.4 mi E/ Daisy Mtn Dr 0.89 mi E/ Daisy Mtn Dr at Stardust Blvd Median 0.75 mi S/ Southern Ave STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Desert Lake Wash Desert Lk Wash S Branch Wash RID Canal RID Canal Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch RID Canal Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drain Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Wash Consolidated Canal Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Channel Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Wash Wash HaydenRhodes CAP Aqueduct Sonoqui Wash Buckeye Canal CAP Canal Gila River Wash RID Canal Buckeye Canal Drainage Ditch Salt River(N.Channel) Salt River(S.Channel) Golf Cart Underpass Drainage Ditch Wash Ped X Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Gila River Sufficiency Rating 97.98 97.98 99.98 97.65 78.08 99.64 95.73 96.02 96.41 98.08 96.72 96.94 96.94 96.94 96.62 98.62 93.59 92.42 90.5 96.93 96.95 96.95 81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 96.95 96.95 86.83 86.83 89.21 NEW 94.85 96.99 98.55 95.55 94.84 98.60 96.73 77.60 77.60 99.63 95.06 73.05 80.67 95.53 95.90 95.90 95.90 96.44 96.44 96.51 96.51 99.51 97.84 84.63 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 90 Appendix Structure No. 990185 8000 8555 990272 9126 9686 990157 990243 990244 10512 9676 9687 990101 990102 8975 9375 9384 8855 9688 9763 9849 990113 9824 7779 990158 9859 9689 10159 10160 10161 10158 9891 9892 9893 10162 9825 990269 990256 7550 7898 11111 10240 990116 990218 10084 10229 10520 990261 990236 990235 10443 990163 990162 990107 990164 10630 10629 Road Ballad Dr Baseline Rd Beardsley Rd Belfair Way Bell Rd Bell Rec Center Dr Beloat Rd Bethany Home Rd Bethany Home Rd Bethany Home Rd Boswell Blvd Boswell Blvd Broadway Rd Broadway Rd Broadway Rd Broadway Rd EB Broadway Rd WB Bruner Rd Burns Drive Bush Hwy Bush Hwy Bush Hwy Bush Hwy Bush Hwy-FAS 388 Camelback Rd Camelback Rd Cameo Dr Carefree Highway Carefree Highway Carefree Highway Carefree Highway Carefree Hwy Carefree Hwy Carefree Hwy Carefree Hwy EB Carefree Hwy WB Carlota Lane Castano Drive Cavalcade Drive Cave Creek PKWY Centennial Rd Chambers Street Chandler Hts Rd Cicero Street Circle Mtn Road Citrus Road Clarendon Avenue Clearview Trail Cloud Rd Cloud Rd Cloud Road Conquistador Dr Conquistador Dr Coralbell Ave Cotton Lane Cotton Lane Cotton Lane Location at Stardust Blvd Median 200' NW MC-85 100' E/ 125th Ave just N of Meridian Drive at 99th Ave at 99th Ave Median E/ Rainbow Rd 350' E of 137th Ave 418' W of 135th Ave 200' E of 125th Ave at Del Webb Blvd Median at 99th Avenue Median at Meridian Rd. 1000' E/ Crismon Rd 400' W/ FanninMcFar CAP 0.2 mi E/ Price Rd 0.2 mi E/ Price Rd 0.75 mi N/ Old US-80 at 99th Avenue Median 3.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd at Blue Point-Salt River 3.25 mi N/ McDowell Rd 1.7 mi N/ Thomas 3.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 0.5 mi E/ El Mirage Rd 1.0 mi E/ El Mirage Rd at 99th Avenue Median 0.5 mi W/ 24th Street 0.25 mi E/ 24th Street 0.5 mi E/ 24th Street W/ 16th Street at 10th St 200' W/ 12th St 200' W/ 24th St 1 mi W/ Cave Creek Rd 1 mi W/ Cave Creek Rd 313' W of 119th Avenue just N. of Bethany Home R 200' E/ 141th Ave 1.5 mi N/32nd St/Cloud Rd 5.7 mi W/ Harqua. Val. Rd 0.6 mi S/ Broadway Rd 0.5 mi E/ SR-87 (AZ Ave) E/ 105 St & N/ Univ Dr 3437' E/ New River Rd just N/ Northern Ave just W/ 195th Ave just N/ Meridian Dr 1000' W/ 32nd Dr just E/ Via Puzzola 500' W of 32nd Drive 200' S/ Beechwood 200' E/ Regal E/ Ellsworth & S/Broadway N/ Camelback Rd 0.25 mi S/ MC-85 1mi. S/ MC-85 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal Drainage Ditch Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal S. Branch Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Tempe Canal Tempe Canal Buckeye Canal Drainage Ditch Spook Hill Fldwy Salt River Wash FanninMcFar CAP Aqueduct Wash Drainage Ditch Agua Fria River Drainage Ditch Wash Wash Apache Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Cave Creek Wash Cave Creek Wash Drainage Ditch Wash Drainage Ditch Wash CAP Aux Canal Buckeye Feeder Ditch Consolidated Canal Drain Ditch Wash Wash Drain Ditch Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch (Wash) Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal Gila River Sufficiency Rating 97.84 93.68 97.36 89.38 76.43 96.63 88.93 85.53 85.53 96.81 96.76 99.81 96.21 96.21 97.33 76.31 76.31 98.98 99.57 86.21 91.77 95.63 96.96 95.63 76.51 77.51 96.86 96.78 96.78 96.78 98.93 98.54 98.54 98.54 97.40 79.92 98.89 96.81 96.73 98.84 98.84 98.99 97.20 96.95 73.63 80.68 92.34 81.73 84.82 87.46 86.72 86.9 96.86 96.85 74.97 98.91 99.91 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 91 Appendix Structure No. 10062 9736 8761 8856 990247 10557 10558 10559 10519 10627 10628 990266 7551 8638 10044 990166 990165 990167 11071 990168 990224 7883 10787 8560 10784 10785 10786 990169 990279 8561 11105 11106 9949 9586 9842 11107 9138 9895 7899 10367 10366 990223 10104 8019 10397 990233 10582 10855 10384 11005 11070 7554 10276 7780 990170 8562 10396 Road Cottonwood Rd Courthouse Rd Crismon Rd Crismon Rd Daisy Mtn Dr RCB Daisy Mtn Drive Daisy Mtn Drive Daisy Mtn Drive Daisy Mtn Drive Daisy Mtn Drive Daisy Mtn Drive Daley Lane Dean Rd Dean Rd Deer Valley Dr Deer Valley Dr Deer Valley Dr Deer Valley Dr Deer Valley Drive Desert Glen Dr Dysart Rd Dysart Rd-FAS 547 Dysart Road Eagle Eye Rd El Granada Blvd El Granada Blvd El Granada Blvd El Mirage Rd El Mirage Rd El Mirage Rd El Mirage Rd El Mirage Rd El Mirage Rd Elliot Rd Ellsworth Ellsworth Rd Ellsworth Rd Ellsworth Rd Ellsworth-FAU 7077 Forest Rd Forest Rd Forest Road Fort McDowell Road Ft McDowell Rd Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gavilan Peak Pkwy Gemstone Drive Germann Road Gilbert Rd-FAS 229 Granite Valley Dr Greenway Rd Happy Valley Pkwy Location N Entrance Lk Plsnt Pk 3 mi W/ Salome Rd 0.25 mi N/ Brown Rd 500' N/ Apache Rd 0.52 mi S of Anthem Way 92' E of Dedication Trail 750' E/ Dedication Trail 0.36 mi NE/ Dedication Tr 0.6 mi S of Anthem Way 0.4mi W/Gavilan Pk Pkwy 520' W/GavilanPk Pkwy just e/ 123rd Avenue 600' N/ Lower Buckeye Rd 0.75 mi N/ MC-85 W/ 135th Ave E/ Veterans W/ Dustrytrail Blvd (SCW) W/ Acapulco Drive Just N/ exist Deer Valley Dr 100' N/ 132nd Ave N/ Camelback Rd 0.25 mi N/ Camelback Rd 0.25 mi. S/ Jomax Rd 2 mi S/ Salome Hwy 0.18 mi. S/ Jomax Rd 0.42 mi. N/HappyValley Rd 0.4 mi. N/ HappyValley Rd 0.25 mi S/ Beardsley 600' S. of Loop 303 N/ Bell Rd 1.7 mi N. of Bell Road 3.4 mi. N. of Bell Road 0.5 mi N/ Glendale Ave at Sossaman 200' S/ Apache Trail Empire Blvd_PinalCo Line 0.25 mi N/ University Rd 400' N/ Broadway 1.4 mi N/ McDowell Mtn Rd 1.3 mi N/ McDowell Mtn Rd 1.3 mi N/McDowell Mtn Rd just N/ Yavapai Rd 2.25 mi N/ SR 87 W/ Navigation Way 1600' E/ Navigation Way just S of Daisy Mtn Dr 840' N of Daisy Mtn Drive 300 ' N. King Drive 0.5 mi N of Pioneer Rd just N. of Jordan Lane 200' W/ 136th Dr_SCW .25 mi E/ Sossaman Rd 0.5 mi N/ Thomas Rd 200' N/ Antelope Dr (SCW) at 99th Ave 1.5 mi W/LkPleasant Rd STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Cottonwood Creek Saddleback Diversn Chn Signal Butte Fldwy CAP Canal Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Channel RID Canal Buckeye Canal Golf Cart Path (SCW) Golf Cart Path Golf Cart Path Golf Cart Path Deer Valley Channel Drainage Ditch Drain Channel Colter Channel Beardsley Canal CAP Canal Drainage Channel Drainage Channel Beardsley Canal Drainage Ditch Pinnacle Pk Drain Channel Drainage Ditch McMicken Dam Outlet Wash McMicken Dam Outlet Wash Dysart Drain Sossaman Ditch Drainage Ditch Sonoqui Wash East Branch Sonoqui Wash CAP Canal Wash Small Wash Large Wash Golf Cart Crossing Wash Wash Wash Wash Deadman Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage channel Salt River Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Agua Fria River Sufficiency Rating 87.58 98.49 84.74 94.47 91.48 83.38 83.38 83.38 91.48 95.67 95.67 96.89 98.66 98.80 85.28 85.63 96.37 96.67 81.61 82.86 95.38 98.38 99.92 97.90 96.93 99.96 99.96 69.86 81.00 83.36 94.05 94.05 97.34 94.20 99.04 84.00 93.25 99.15 99.04 93.85 95.74 84.41 99.59 86.57 81.61 83.54 94.19 95.96 96.37 97.27 98.66 89.29 89.84 72.63 96.41 88.41 85.78 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 92 Appendix Structure No. 10457 10458 11006 990249 990254 990255 10518 10581 9503 9668 10085 8640 990213 990172 9145 990225 990260 10088 990175 9831 8680 990268 10274 10511 990248 990177 10052 10053 7556 11110 7901 990128 990214 990215 990219 990220 990127 10230 7819 7583 990262 10105 10242 8797 990179 990226 10385 10386 10388 990275 10560 10561 10108 7557 990217 10846 10847 Road Happy Valley Pkwy Happy Valley Pkwy Happy Valley Road Hastings Way Hastings Way Hastings Way Hemingway Lane High Noon Way Higley Rd Hutton Drive I-17 Frontage Rd I-17 Frontage Rd I-17 Frontage Rd Indian School Rd Indian School Rd Indian Springs Rd Iron Horse Way Jackrabbit Trail Jackrabbit Trail Jackrabbit Trail Johnson Rd Jomax Road Jomax Road King Drive Laurel Valley Way Lk Pleasant Ent Rd Lone Mountain Rd Lone Mountain Rd Lower Buckeye Rd Marsh Rd MC 85 Hwy MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 MC-85 Hwy McDowell Rd McDowell Road McKellips Road Meadowbrook Ave Meeker Blvd Meeker Blvd Memorial Drive Memorial Drive Memorial Drive Memorial Drive Memorial Drive Meridian Drive Meridian Drive Meridian Rd Meridian Rd Meridian Rd Meridian Rd (Mesa) Meridian Rd (Mesa) Location 2.06 mi w/ Lake Pleasant Rd 1.65 mi W/Lake Pleasant Rd 0.7 mi E of Dysart Rd 250' SE of Hickcock Trail 250' SW of Blaze Court 277' NW of Blaze Court just E of Dedication Trail just N of Kuralt Drive 0.5 mi S/ Germann at 99th Ave Median_SCW 1000' S/ New River Rd 0.7 mi S/ New River S/ Meander Rd at 191st Ave 0.5 mi E/ El Mirage W/ El Mirage Rd just N/ Meridian Dr 0.25 mi N/ Yuma 0.25 mi S/ SR-85 1000' N/ Southern Ave 0.25 mi N/ Broadway 0.25 mi. W of Dysart Rd .25 mi W/ Grand Ave 180' W of Opportunity Way just N of Keller Drive 0.2 mi E/ Castle HSpr Rd 0.75 mi E/ 227th Ave 0.65 mi E/ 227th Ave 1 mi W/ El Mirage Rd 0.5 mi W/ Perryville 0.25 mi E/ Cotton Lane 0.25 mi E/ Perryville Rd Just E/ Perryville Rd 335' W/ Estrella Pkwy 0.3 mi W/Estrella Pkwy 0.5 mi W/ Sarival 0.3 mi E/ Estrella Pkwy 0.5 mi W/ El Mirage W/ Jackrabbit Tr_195th Av 0.5 mi E of Hawes Rd_Mesa 0.5 mi W/ Loop 101 W/ Jackrabbit Tr (195Ave) 0.5 mi S/ RH Johnson Rd 0.75 mi S/ RH Johnson 170' E of Republic Way 600' E of Gavilan Pk Pkwy 1700' E of Gavilan Pk Pkwy 350' E of Republic Way 270' W of Daisy Mtn Drive 480' S/ Daisy Mtn Dr 0.3 mi S/ Daisy Mtn Dr 0.25 mi N/ McKellips Rd 0.5 mi N/ Brown Rd 1/8 mi N/ University 0.5 mi S of Warner Rd 0.5 mi S of Warner Road STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Wash Wash Trilby Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash RWCD Canal Drainage Ditch New River Wash Wash Beardsley Canal Agua Fria River Wash Wash RID Canal Buckeye Canal S. Branch Buckeye Canal RID Canal Drainage Channel Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash AFR Diversion Channel Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal S Branch Buckeye Canal S Branch Dirt Irr Ditch Dirt Irr Ditch Drainage Ditch Bullard Wash Agua Fria River Wash Drainage Ditch Granite Reef Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Golf Cart Underpass Split Flow Wash Wash Wash Split Flow Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Bulldog Floodway Drainage Ditch Drainage Channel Power Line Fldwy Channel Sufficiency Rating 91.32 91.32 96.55 96.78 96.78 96.78 89.34 96.89 92.31 99.68 88.32 96.62 99.58 68.87 76.86 97.72 89.38 97.12 97.76 98.33 98.88 96.47 99.94 89.40 96.89 93.87 98.96 98.96 83.14 NEW 97.06 79.81 81.65 81.65 90.16 90.16 93.55 94.23 94.86 99.88 96.74 98.61 92.94 96.24 96.24 81.61 81.78 81.78 81.78 96.66 99.33 99.33 81.2 85.24 96.54 96.06 96.06 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 93 Appendix Structure No. 10442 9593 10778 10241 990246 990245 10510 10086 8011 10021 7642 7643 10106 10083 10781 10780 8565 10507 10521 990114 8021 990181 990207 10061 990209 8025 8023 990180 990205 990206 9834 990155 11007 9999 990208 8981 11009 990276 10516 9588 10779 10517 990251 9426 7782 10580 8569 8043 8044 990264 990271 9928 9927 10390 990121 8681 10776 Road Meridian Road Miller Rd Mingus Road Minnesota Ave Missouri Ave Missouri Ave Missouri Ave New River Rd New River Rd New River Rd New River Rd New River Rd New River Road New River Road Northern Avenue Northern Avenue Old Lk Plsnt AccRd Old SR 87 Old SR 87 Old Stage Road Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Old US 80 Olive Ave Olive Ave & BNSFRR Olive Avenue Olive Avenue Olive Avenue Olive Avenue Osborn Road Owens Drive Palo Verde Rd Palo Verde Rd Patagonia Way Patton Rd Perryville Rd Perryville Rd Pinnacle Peak Rd Plymouth Drive Power Rd Power Rd Power Road Queen Creek Rd Rainbow Rd Rainbow Road Location 0.45 mi N/ Warner Rd 0.25 mi N/ SR-85 just E/ 25th Avenue W/ Jackrabbit Trl just W of Dysart S/ Marshall Ave near 135 N/ Marshall Ave_135thAve 100' E/ I 17 Frontage 0.25 mi E/ I 17 0.25 mi W/ 7th Ave at 29th Ave 0.25 mi E/ 27th Ave 0.25 mi E/ I 17 350' N/ Circle Mtn Rd 1 mi W/ Perryville Rd 1 mi. W/ Perryville Rd 1 mi N/ SR-74 0.8 mi NW of New SR87Junc 1.0 mi NW of New SR87Junc 0.6 mi N/ New River Rd S/ Gillespie Dam 0.25 mi S/ Cactus Rose 1 mi S/ Cactus Rose 0.3 mi S/ 331th Ave 1.5 mi S/ Cactus Rose 600' N/ 331st Ave 1 mi S/ Arlington Sch Rd 50' S/ Cactus Rose 0.75 mi S/ Cactus Rose 7/8 mi S/ Cactus Rose 1 mi W/ Jct SR-85 0.5 mi W/ Palo Verde Rd 3.5 mi S of Patterson Rd 500' E/ Salome Hwy 1.25 mi S/ Cactus Rose 0.8 mi E/ El Mirage Rd just W of Reems Road 800' E of Perryville Rd .5 mi W/ Perryville Rd E/ of 99th Ave 0.49 mi. W/ Perryville Rd just W of 195th Avenue E of Capra Way 0.25 mi N/ Broadway 0.75 mi N/ Old US80 Hwy N of Honor Court (Anthem) 1 mi W/ Grand Ave 1/3 mi S/ Van Buren 0.5 mi N/ Southern 70' w/ 121st Avenue just E of Gavilan Pk Pkwy S/ Guadalupe Rd S/ Guadalupe Rd 0.2 mi S/ Queen Creek Rd 0.3 mi W/ Higley 1 mi N/ Broadway 0.5 mi S/ Southern Avenue STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Wash Buckeye Canal White Spar Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Skunk Creek Wash Wash New River Cline Creek Wash FRS#3 Dvrsn Chnl Beardsley Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Gila River Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Arlington Valley Wash Buckeye Drain Buckeye Lateral Layton Wash Hassayampa River Arlington Valley Wash Agua Fria River Reems Road Channel Wash Wash W/ Beardsley Canal New River Waterfall Wash Drain Ditch Wash RID Canal Buckeye Canal Wash CAP Canal RID Canal Buckeye Canal Drainage Ditch Drainage Channel East Maricopa Fldwy RWCD Canal (N. Crossing) Queen Creek RWCD Canal (Gilbert) RID Canal Buckeye Canal Sufficiency Rating 99.82 86.24 99.96 96.96 84.28 84.37 84.39 86.55 97.87 98.65 99.76 99.76 97.87 99.65 83.91 89.87 88.91 94.26 94.26 86.93 46.50 64.79 85.85 89.35 94.86 95.16 95.81 96.86 96.87 96.87 98.68 98.89 99.51 99.68 99.87 91.08 82.38 79.52 80.00 80.85 84.77 84.73 89.38 98.17 98.77 96.89 93.98 98.78 98.88 83.74 81.73 80.65 92.60 94.96 65.77 98.50 98.24 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 94 Appendix Structure No. 990277 990278 11008 8570 990182 11108 990270 8038 10239 9669 9670 9832 990112 8982 990186 990252 990253 990211 990222 990108 7716 8884 8573 990183 7644 7645 7646 7647 7648 7649 7650 7651 7652 7653 990134 7655 7656 990135 990136 7657 7658 7659 990137 990138 7660 7661 990139 7662 7663 990140 990141 990142 990143 990144 990145 990146 7664 Road Ray Road Ray Road Reems Rd RH Johnson Blvd RH Johnson Blvd Riggs Rd Riggs Road Rittenhouse Rd Roeser Rd Royal Oak Rd Royal Ridge Rd Salome Rd Signal Butte Rd Signal Butte Rd Skylark Dr Sossaman Rd Sossaman Rd Southern Ave Southern Ave Southern Ave Southern Ave Southern Ave Spanish Garden Dr Stardust Blvd Sun Valley Pkwy Sun Valley Pkwy-01 Sun Valley Pkwy-02 Sun Valley Pkwy-03 Sun Valley Pkwy-04 Sun Valley Pkwy-05 Sun Valley Pkwy-06 Sun Valley Pkwy-07 Sun Valley Pkwy-08 Sun Valley Pkwy-09 Sun Valley Pkwy-10 Sun Valley Pkwy-12 Sun Valley Pkwy-13 Sun Valley Pkwy-14 Sun Valley Pkwy-15 Sun Valley Pkwy-16 Sun Valley Pkwy-17 Sun Valley Pkwy-18 Sun Valley Pkwy-19 Sun Valley Pkwy-20 Sun Valley Pkwy-21 Sun Valley Pkwy-22 Sun Valley Pkwy-23 Sun Valley Pkwy-24 Sun Valley Pkwy-25 Sun Valley Pkwy-26 Sun Valley Pkwy-27 Sun Valley Pkwy-28 Sun Valley Pkwy-29 Sun Valley Pkwy-30 Sun Valley Pkwy-31 Sun Valley Pkwy-32 Sun Valley Pkwy-33 Location 1200' E of Mountain Rd 900' E of Mountain Rd 0.5 mi N of Northern Ave N/ Bell Rd 100' E/ 132nd Ave 160' W of Robson Blvd 0.25 mi N/ Cloud 0.5 mi S/ Broadway Rd at 99th Avenue Median at 99th Avenue Median 8 mi W/ Harquahala Val Rd 0.5 mi N/ Brown Rd N/ Broadway Rd at Stardust Blvd Median 980' N of McDowell Rd 0.3 mi N of McDowell Rd 0.5 mi E/ MC-85 (unpaved rd) 0.5 mi E/ Crismon Rd E/ Ellsworth (Mesa) .6mi E of Signal Butte Rd .6mi E/ Signal Butte Rd 200' E/ 132nd Ave 165' S/ Yosemite Rd 300' W/ McMicken Dam 0.7 mi N/ McDowell Rd 0.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 1.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 1.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 1.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 2.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 2.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 2.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 2.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 2.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 3.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 3.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 3.7 mi N/ McDowell Rd 4.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 4.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 4.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 4.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 4.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 5.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 5.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 5.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 5.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.7 mi N/ McDowell Rd 6.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 7.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 7.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 7.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 7.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Wash Wash Reems Road Channel Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Sonoqui Wash Golf Cart Underpass Queen Creek Wash Buckeye Feeder Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch CAP Canal Signal Butte Floodway Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Wash Drain Ditch Buckeye Canal S Branch Drainage Channel Drainage Ditch CAP Drainage Channel CAP Canal (Mesa) Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch McMicken Dam Channel Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Sufficiency Rating 96.98 96.98 82.58 69.65 81.25 NEW 91.64 86.00 98.98 96.85 85.83 94.52 97.90 98.84 97.84 89.38 89.38 93.63 94.50 95.93 97.55 97.55 97.74 96.78 99.46 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 93.85 90.85 93.85 93.85 89.79 90.85 90.85 78.99 90.85 90.85 90.85 93.85 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 95 Appendix Structure No. 7665 7666 990147 7667 7668 990148 990149 990150 7669 7670 7671 7672 7673 990189 990190 7674 7675 7676 7677 7678 7679 7680 7681 7682 990191 7683 7684 7685 990192 990193 7687 7688 990194 7689 7690 7691 990195 7692 990196 7693 7694 7695 990197 7696 7697 7698 7699 7700 7701 7702 7703 990198 7704 7705 990110 9683 990200 Road Sun Valley Pkwy-34 Sun Valley Pkwy-35 Sun Valley Pkwy-36 Sun Valley Pkwy-37 Sun Valley Pkwy-38 Sun Valley Pkwy-39 Sun Valley Pkwy-40 Sun Valley Pkwy-41 Sun Valley Pkwy-42 Sun Valley Pkwy-43 Sun Valley Pkwy-44 Sun Valley Pkwy-45 Sun Valley Pkwy-46 Sun Valley Pkwy-47 Sun Valley Pkwy-48 Sun Valley Pkwy-49 Sun Valley Pkwy-50 Sun Valley Pkwy-51 Sun Valley Pkwy-52 Sun Valley Pkwy-53 Sun Valley Pkwy-54 Sun Valley Pkwy-55 Sun Valley Pkwy-56 Sun Valley Pkwy-57 Sun Valley Pkwy-58 Sun Valley Pkwy-59 Sun Valley Pkwy-60 Sun Valley Pkwy-61 Sun Valley Pkwy-63 Sun Valley Pkwy-64 Sun Valley Pkwy-65 Sun Valley Pkwy-66 Sun Valley Pkwy-67 Sun Valley Pkwy-68 Sun Valley Pkwy-69 Sun Valley Pkwy-70 Sun Valley Pkwy-71 Sun Valley Pkwy-72 Sun Valley Pkwy-73 Sun Valley Pkwy-74 Sun Valley Pkwy-75 Sun Valley Pkwy-76 Sun Valley Pkwy-77 Sun Valley Pkwy-78 Sun Valley Pkwy-79 Sun Valley Pkwy-80 Sun Valley Pkwy-81 Sun Valley Pkwy-82 Sun Valley Pkwy-83 Sun Valley Pkwy-84 Sun Valley Pkwy-85 Sun Valley Pkwy-86 Sun Valley Pkwy-87 Sun Valley Pkwy-88 Sunland Ave Thunderbird Rd Trail Ridge Dr Location 7.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd. 7.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 7.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 8.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 8.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 8.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 8.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 8.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 9.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 9.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 10.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 10.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 10.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 10.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 10.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 11.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 12.0 mi N/ McDowell Rd 13.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 13.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 14.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 14.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 17.7 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 18.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.3 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.7 mi N/ McDowell Rd 19.7 mi N McDowell Rd 19.8 mi N/ McDowell Rd 20.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 21.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 21.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 22.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 22.5 mi N/ McDowell Rd 22.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 22.9 mi N/ McDowell Rd 23.4 mi N/ McDowell Rd 23.6 mi N/ McDowell Rd 24.1 mi N/ McDowell Rd 24.2 mi N/ McDowell Rd E/ Ellsworth at 99th Ave Median 200' W/ Yosemite Dr STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Wash Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch Sufficiency Rating 93.85 92.85 90.85 92.85 93.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 93.85 93.85 81.99 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 90.85 96.89 87.58 96.83 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 96 Appendix Structure No. 8629 8584 990152 9374 8862 8882 8881 7706 990273 8983 990274 10369 10514 10515 10513 8577 10782 990263 8578 9919 990267 Road Turner Rd Tuthill Rd Union Hills Dr University Dr University Drive Van Buren St Van Buren St Van Buren St Venture Drive Via Hermosa White Tanks Mnt Blvd Whitman Drive Wigwam Creek Blvd Wigwam Creek Blvd Wigwam Creek Blvd Wildwood Drive Williams Drive Williams Drive Wilson (283rd) Ave Woods Rd Yearling Road Location 0.5 mi S/ Baseline Rd 0.5 mi S/ Beloat Rd at 99th Ave 900' W/ Dobson 0.5 mi E/ Ellsworth Rd 1 mi W/ 339th Ave 0.5 mi W/ Citrus Rd E/ SVP-Palo Verde Rd 0.46 mi. SW of Anthem Way W/ Forest Rd (Rio Verde) 460' W of 183rd Ave 600' E/ Galvin Peak Pkwy 550' NW of Orange Drive just N of Camelback Rd 200' SW of 124th Lane 200' W/ 125th Ave 0.3 mi. E/ El Mirage Rd at 123rd Avenue 1 mi S/ Baseline E/ Old US-80 0.2 mi. e/ Litchfield Rd STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT | www.mcdot.maricopa.gov Feature Intersected Buckeye Canal Gila River Drainage Ditch Tempe Canal CAP Canal Dickey Wash RID Canal Drainage Ditch Wash Wash Drainage Channel Wash Drain Ditch Drain Ditch Drain Channel Drainage Ditch McMicken Outfall Wash Drainage Ditch Buckeye Canal Gila Bend Canal Drainage Channel Sufficiency Rating 99.94 96.28 95.65 95.43 98.41 91.13 98.55 99.88 84.25 99.70 96.85 99.86 81.45 81.45 96.55 97.96 83.63 89.34 98.72 98.51 85.62 FISCAL YEARS 2013 & 2014 97