INTRODUCTION
The 2012 State of the System Report (SOS) is a compilation of the physical inventory
and status of the Maricopa County Department of Transportation’s (MCDOT)
infrastructure. It addresses roadway congestion, traffic safety, low volume road paving,
bridges, and pavement conditions. Also, included are recommendations for future
improvements within each of the infrastructure categories. The SOS report has been
produced annually since 1998.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Congestion Management System
Current and future roadway congestion is addressed in the Congestion Management
System Report (CMS). The ratio of a roadway segment’s current traffic volume as
compared to its physical capacity (V/C Ratio) is used to determine its congestion level.
The conservative method of measuring congestion as identified in the MCDOT
Roadway Design Manual is used in the report. Roadways under the jurisdiction of
MCDOT were analyzed with respect to their V/C ratios and their corresponding Levels
of Service (LOS).
Safety Management System
Safety conditions on MCDOT roadways are addressed under the Safety Management
System Report (SMS). This report documents the intersection safety improvements
made each year and those planned for the following year. In 2012 MCDOT completed
13 intersection safety improvements and has planned an additional 10 to be completed
in 2013. The SMS also tracks the overall crash rates and crash history of MCDOT
roadways.
Low Volume Road Management System
Paving Low Volume Roads is an annual budgeted activity within MCDOT’s
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Dirt roadways are selected for paving
based on criteria established by the MCDOT Transportation Advisory Board and the
Federal Environmental Protection Agency through the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality. Since 1983 MCDOT has paved more than 453 miles of dirt
roadways.
Bridge Management System
Bridges and other structures are identified in the Bridge Management System (BMS).
In 2012 MCDOT maintains 421 bridges and structures. This includes 82 bridges and
339 culverts. No new bridges and structures were added this year however two
structures were removed through annexations by cities and towns. Bridges and
structures are categorized as Federal or Non-Federal depending on their length. Those
1

over 20 feet in length are classified as bridges. Those under 20 feet in length are
classified as structures. Federal bridges and structures are rated on a 1-100 scale
using the Federal Highway Administration’s rating system. Those that have a rating
between 50 and 80 are eligible for federal bridge rehabilitation funds. Bridges and
structures rated below 50 are eligible for federal bridge replacement funds. In 2011
MCDOT had 23 bridges and structures rated between 50 and 80 and only one bridge
rated below 50. The BMS lists all of MCDOT bridges and structures as well as their
ratings.
Each year MCDOT must report the physical status of their bridges to the Board of
Supervisors (BOS) in accordance with the Governments Accounting Standards Board
Statement 34 (GASB). The physical condition of MCDOT’s bridges is within the
targeted bridge sufficiency ratings (BSR) adopted by the BOS.
Criteria

Target Value

Actual Value

% of Bridges and Structures with BSR > 70

min. 90%

98.8%

% of Bridges & Structures with BSR < 50

max. 3%

0%

Roadway Management System
The Roadway Management System (RMS) is the pavement management program
MCDOT uses to track and report on the physical attributes and conditions of all
MCDOT paved roads. Two methods are used to measure a roadway’s condition. The
International Roughness Index (IRI) is based on a 1-500 scale. The Pavement
Condition Rating (PCR) are on a 1-100 scale. In 2011 81.01% of all roadways were
rated Excellent to Good with respect to their PCR while only 0.61% were rated fair to
poor. Using the IRI, 17.6% of MCDOT’s roadways were rated Smooth to Very Smooth
with 44.6% rated rough to very rough.
Asset Management System
PCR Quality

PCR Range

Miles

Percent

Excellent to Very Good

> 70

901.58

81.01%

Fair to Poor

< 55

6.77

0.61%

The Maricopa County and the Department of Transportation (MCDOT) maintains
effective internal controls to manage its infrastructure assets, and to maintain proper
records regarding the use and disposition of these assets. This is done to safeguard
and maintain MCDOT’s assets in order to receive the maximum benefit from these
assets and to comply with State and Federal requirements regarding their use and
disposition. MCDOT properly accounts each year for its infrastructure assets for
financial reporting purposes in accordance with the GASB Statement 34.

2

MCDOT provides transparency as to how services are provided within the organization
and to the County’s constituents. It is the intent of the MCDOT Planning Division and
Asset Management Team to educate, inform, develop and streamline Asset
Management Reporting throughout MCDOT.

3

Congestion Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

Page

Purpose of the CMS

1

Past MCDOT Congestion Management Efforts

1
1

CMS OBJECTIVES
Objectives Based on the Comprehensive Plan

1

Objectives Based on the Transportation System Plan

2

CONGESTION EVALUATION PARAMETERS

2

MCDOT Roadway Design Manual Definition

2

CMS Performance Measures

3

Area of Consideration

3

CMS ANALYSIS PROCESS

3

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

3

List of Tables
Table 1: Top 100 Roadway Segments with V/C Ratio > 0.75

4

Table 2: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr. ADT Increase

6

Table 3: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr. ADT Decrease

8

List of Maps
Map 1: 2011 Traffic Counts

10

Map 2: Over Capacity Roadways, V/C Ratios > 0.75 in 2011

11

MCDOT

CMS

i

Congestion Management System

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND
Purpose of the CMS
The Maricopa County Congestion Management System (CMS) identifies existing and
potential traffic congestion on Maricopa County roads.
The purpose for the CMS is:
1. To identify and measure traffic congestion on Maricopa County roads based on
MCDOT’s annual traffic count program.
2. To implement the goals in the County’s Comprehensive Plan and the Major Streets
and Routes Plan.
3. To improve the efficiency and safety of travel on Maricopa County roads.
Past MCDOT Congestion Management Efforts
MCDOT has developed and updated its CMS annually for the past 15 years. The CMS
identifies congested roads based on the volume/capacity criteria established in the
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual (RDM) (Revised April 2004).
The adopted MCDOT Transportation System Plan (TSP) sets the overall policies, goals,
and fundamental considerations for MCDOT decisions concerning current and future
transportation needs and investments.
The TSP also recommends investment priorities based on three types of routes;
primary, secondary and local. Much of the content of the TSP regarding CMS
development and actions are a reflection of the County’s Comprehensive Plan
guidelines for transportation management.
CMS OBJECTIVES
Objectives Based on the Comprehensive Plan
The adopted Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan directs the management of
MCDOT. The Plan calls for the coordination of development, conservation of natural
resources, effective expenditures of public monies, and the promotion of the health,
convenience and welfare of the County's citizens. Several objectives related to
congestion are set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
They include:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Reducing trips made in single occupancy vehicles.
Increasing transit ridership.
Employing technology to improve transportation facilities.
Identify and accommodate transportation corridors.

CMS

1

MCDOT

Congestion Management System

5. Optimize public investment.
6. Minimize travel times.
Objectives Based on the Transportation System Plan
The TSP provides guidance to manage the Maricopa County roadway network. The
TSP goals set forth a vision for the planning and construction of transportation facilities
in the County. The TSP includes several objectives to ease traffic congestion:
1. Roadway widening.
2. Intersection improvements.
3. Alternate route enhancement.
4. Establish parking rules that influence traffic congestion reduction.
5. Improvements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
6. Provide for both current and future traffic volume needs.
7. Monitor and measure congestion.
8. Help decide what improvements are needed.
9. Identify alternative actions.
10. Recommend cost-effective mitigation measures.
11. Evaluate actions related to congestion management.
CONGESTION EVALUATION PARAMETERS
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual Definition
The MCDOT Roadway Design Manual (RDM) (Revised April 2004) uses a combined
functional classification and level of service (LOS) system for defining congestion. This
provides a measure of congestion and the flexibility to view individual road segments
based on their general characteristics and desired operation. To determine whether a
segment is congested, a minimum desired LOS is first assigned based on its functional
classification (Table 1). Local roads are classified at LOS A, collectors at B and C, and
arterials at C and D depending on their urban or rural classification. Roadway
capacities are established based on their desired minimum LOS and adjusted for the
number of lanes. Their traffic volumes are then divided by their roadway capacities to
see if they exceed the desired LOS.
The definition of congestion in the CMS is based on the operation of a roadway and
the RDM standards. If traffic volumes exceed the RDM roadway capacity, the road is
considered congested.
CMS Performance Measures
Accurate identification of congestion on roadway segments and intersections is critical
to the effective management of the entire network. This CMS identifies road segments
where congestion is currently occurring.
MCDOT

CMS

2

Congestion Management System

MCDOT uses traffic volume to roadway capacity ratios (V/C) because they best identify
congestion while satisfying County congestion management needs. These ratios
typically use the average number of vehicles (in the most recent year) that travel a road
per day divided by the number of vehicles that the road can reasonably handle per day,
as per the RDM standards.
Area of Consideration
Geographically, the CMS is applied within the confines of Maricopa County and to
roadways that are partially or completely under Maricopa County control. The MCDOT
2011 traffic count program includes counts on many of MCDOT’s arterial and collector
roadways.
CMS ANALYSIS PROCESS
This report uses the data from the annual 2011 MCDOT traffic count program and
previous MCDOT traffic data. There were 1,291 arterial and collector roadway
segments that were counted in 2011. Each roadway segment with a 2011 traffic count
was compared to its 2007 count value. The absolute ADT increases or decreases were
calculated along with each segment’s positive or negative change between 2007 and
2011. A roadway volume to capacity ratio was then calculated based on the number of
lanes in each segment, the RDM recommended roadway capacity, and each segment’s
2011 traffic count. The results are shown in Table 2.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the 2011 MCDOT traffic count program are shown on Map 1. All roadway
segments with a Volume to Capacity ratio (V/C) greater than 0.75 are shown on Map 2.
This means that the 2011 traffic volumes on these roadway segments exceed 75% of
the road’s vehicle carrying capacity, according to the MCDOT RDM. The RDM criteria
shown in Table 1 are very conservative with respect to capacity. This is done to give
MCDOT ample warning of potential problems.
A roadway’s high V/C ratio may indicate a capacity problem. However, the solution may
not be to immediately increase the capacity of the roadway. There may be multiple
causes and solutions. For example, not having enough alternative routes parallel to a
congested roadway may cause a temporary increase in traffic or a roadway may also be
experiencing increased traffic due to construction or closures on alternative routes.
Therefore, a thorough analysis of the roadway segments with high V/C ratios is required
before there is a determination concerning which ones need immediate attention and
which have high ratios due to other unseen or temporary factors. Detailed scoping
studies may be necessary to further define solutions to the capacity problems identified
in this report.

CMS

3

MCDOT

Congestion Management System

Table 1: Top 100 Roadway Segments with V/C Ratio > .75

MCDOT

CMS

4

Congestion Management System

Table 1: Top 100 Roadway Segments with V/C Ratio > .75 (cont)

CMS

5

MCDOT

Congestion Management System

Table 2: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr ADT Increase

MCDOT

CMS

6

Congestion Management System

Table 2: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr. ADT Increase

CMS

7

MCDOT

Congestion Management System

Table 3: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr. ADT Decrease

MCDOT

CMS

8

Congestion Management System

Table 3: Top 100 Roadway Segments With The Greatest 5 Yr. ADT Decrease (cont.)

CMS

9

MCDOT

Í
?

Hazen Rd

!
(

!
(

Southern Ave

!
(

219th Ave

Rainbow Rd
Dean Rd

Beloat Rd

!
(

!
(

Elliot Rd

!
(

Perryville Rd

Riggs Rd

!
(

!
(

Glendale Ave

!
(
!
(

!
(

!
(

Patterson Rd

!
(

GLENDALE

85

7
5
6
4

Thomas Rd

!
(

Southern Ave

!
(

$
a
"
!

!
(

ß
A

v
I

Broadway Rd

! !
(
(

Peoria Ave

Greenway Rd

Bethany Home Rd

Rd

Estrella Dr

!
(
!
(

!
(

Dobbins Rd

!
(

Carver Rd

!
(

!
(

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Camelback Rd

$
c
"
!

Union Hills Dr

Northern Ave

Elliot Rd

!
(

!
(

ß
A
Bell Rd

Glendale Ave

Lower Buckeye Rd

!
(

Carefree Hwy

Van Buren St

TOLLESON

!
! (
!(
!(
!(
!(
(

!
!
((
!
(

AVONDALE

!
(
LITCHFIELD PARK

!
(

!
(

!
(

EL MIRAGE

Ave
!
(
Burns

! Lindgren
(

Beardsley Rd

PEORIA

107th Ave

! !
(
(
!
(!
(
!
(
! YOUNGTOWN (
(
!

!
( (
(!
!

GOODYEAR

!
(

!
(

! Olive Ave (
(
!

Chandler Heights Rd

!
(

!
(

vd
Bl

Greenway Rd
Waddell Rd

ÿ
A

Northern Ave

rise

Sun

!
(

Dysart Rd

Sarival Ave

Dysart Rd

12
8th
Ave
El Mirage Rd
Old El Mirage Rd
El Mirage Rd

Dr

203rd Ave

Narramore Rd
Arlington Rd

Airport Rd

Litchfield Rd

103rd Ave

107th Ave
99th Ave

Camelback Rd

Jackrabbit Tr

91st Ave

New Ri
ver Rd

91st Ave
83rd Ave
83rd Ave

SURPRISE

Citrus Rd

Rainbow Valley Rd

Avondale Blvd

75th Ave
75th Ave

51st Ave

51st Ave

27th Ave
27th Ave

Be
ltli

¸
?

Southern Ave

32nd St

$
a
"
!

!
(
!
(

Northern Ave

ñ
A

!
(

$
a
"
!

á
A

GUADALUPE

Baseline Rd

TEMPE

McDowell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

Camelback Rd

Broadway Rd

ß
A

Bell Rd

!
(

ñ
A

Hunt Hwy

Riggs Rd

j ?
A
Ð

Ð
?

Germann Rd

CHANDLER

Warner Rd

Southern Ave

!
(

!
(

Williams Field Rd

GILBERT

v
I

Rd

!
(

San Tan Blvd

!
(

!
(

Chandler Heights Rd

MESA

Brown Rd

McDowell Rd

Th omas

FOUNTAIN HILLS

Rio Verde Dr

144th St

McKellips Rd

University Dr

ñ
A

Ð
?

SCOTTSDALE

ß Union Hills Dr
A

CAREFREE
New RiverRd
Carefree Hwy

De er Valle
y Dr

Chandler Heights Rd

Buckeye Rd

PHOENIX

ne
Rd

$
c
"
!

PHOENIX

!
(

Cloud Rd

16th St

7th St

7th St

Rd
Cre
ek
Cav
e

7th Ave

7th Ave

7th Ave

43rd Ave

43rd Ave

BUCKEYE

203rd Ave

Dobson Rd

32nd St
32nd St

Dobson Rd

Joy Ranch Rd

Cooper Rd

Â
?

67th Ave

203rd Ave

Tuthill Rd

Power Rd

McDowell Moun
tain Rd

Recker Rd

Needleroc kRd
McD
owe d
ll R

!
(

!
(

Rit
te

Hawes Rd

H
Bush

Ð
?

!
(!
(!
(

nh
ou
se

Rd

Germann Rd

wy

!
(

!
(

!
(

Meridian Rd

y

!
(
Empire Blvd
Hu
nt
Hw

Cloud Rd

!
(

!
(

Warner Rd

QUEEN CREEK

80th St

Alma School
Rd
Alma School Rd

Cotton Ln

Cotton Ln

Gilbert Rd

16th St

16th St

32nd St
Val Vista Dr

Use
ry P

ass
Rd
Crismon Rd

Reems Rd
Bullard Ave

Bullard Ave

Bullard Ave

Ellsworth Rd

67th Ave
Saint

Hawes Rd

Fo
rt
Sossaman Rd

Signal Butte Rd

Alsup Ave

Mountain Rd

Citrus Rd

92nd St

Meridian Rd

d
Forest R
Wild Horse Dr

ns
Joh

Map 1

15,464 - 22,322 vehicles
22,323 - 29,181 vehicles
29,182 - 36,708 vehicles

!
(
!
(
!
(

I

2 3 4 5 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterials

CMS 10

May 15, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

APACHE JUNCTION
0 1

8,605 - 15,463 vehicles
!
(

State Highways

6,407 - 8,604 vehicles
!
(

TOP 100
AVERAGE DAILY
TRAFFIC COUNTS
FY 2011

Í
?

!
(

!
(

Southern Ave

!
(

Rainbow Rd

Glendale Ave

!
(

Thomas
Rd

Narramore Rd
Arlington Rd

Elliot Rd

!
(

!
(

!
(

!
(

Patterson Rd

!
(
!
(

Dysart Rd

PEORIA

!
(

!
(

85

7
5
6
4

LITCHFIELD PARK

!
!(
!(
(

!
(

Olive Ave

!
(

Peoria Ave

!
(

!
(

!
(
!
(

!
(

¸
?

$
c
"
!

Southern Ave

Buckeye Rd

PHOENIX

Bethany Home Rd

Be
ltlin
eR
d

Dobbins Rd

!
(

Carver Rd
Estrella Dr

Elliot Rd

!
(

!
(

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Camelback Rd

Lower Buckeye Rd

!
(

Union Hills Dr

Greenway Rd

Bell Rd

ß
A

$
c
"
!

PHOENIX

!
(

16th St

Joy Ranch Rd
7th St
7th St

Cloud Rd

Cre
ek
Rd

32nd St

$
a
"
!

!
(

Dr

!
(

Northern
Ave

á
A

Chandler Heights Rd

!
(

$
a
"
!

Baseline Rd

ñ
A

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

McDowell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

Broadway Rd

ñ
A

Hunt Hwy

!
(
Riggs Rd

j ?
A
Ð

Ð
?

Germann Rd

CHANDLER

MESA

!
(

!
(

v
I

rt

!
(

!
(

!
(
San Tan Blvd

!
(

!(
!(
!
(

Germann Rd
ou
se

!
(

Goldfield
Rd
Hwy
Bush

Ð
?

!
(
Empire Blvd
Hu
nt
Hw
y

Cloud Rd

QUEEN CREEK

Rit
ten
h

!
(
Warner Rd

Chandler Heights Rd

GILBERT

Southern Ave

University Dr

Fo

Thomas
Rd

Brown Rd

FOUNTAIN HILLS

Rio Verde Dr

144th St

McKellips Rd

ñ
A

Ð
?

Camelback Rd

Dr

SCOTTSDALE

Union Hills
Bell Rd

ß
A

ß
A

CAREFREE

Carefree Hwy

Deer Valley

Cav
e

Carefree Hwy

Van Buren St

!
(

TOLLESON

Broadway Rd

!
(

$
a
"
!

!
(
AVONDALE

!
(

!
(

!
(
GLENDALE (
!

!
(

91st Ave

I
v
ß
!A
!(
!(
(

!
Burns (
Dr
!
!(
(
!
(
!
(
!
(
!(
(
EL MIRAGE
!
!
(
! YOUNGTOWN (
(
!

! (
!(
(
!

GOODYEAR

!
(

Chandler Heights Rd

!
(

!
(

!
(

!
(

Su
n
Blv rise
d

ÿ
A

! (
!
(
Northern Ave

Camelback
Rd

Riggs Rd

Peoria Ave

Waddell Rd

Olive Ave

BUCKEYE

Beloat Rd

!
(

219th Ave

Dean Rd

Greenway Rd

Jackrabbit Tr
Perryville Rd

Litchfield Rd

Bullard Ave

Dysart Rd

El Mirage Rd

Citrus
Rd

Cotton Ln

Old El Mirage Rd

Avondale Blvd

Alsup Sarival Ave
Reems Rd
Ave

107th Ave
107th Ave

91st Ave
83rd Ave

203rd Ave

Airport Rd

203rd Ave

99th Ave

ell Rd

Ne
w Riv
er Rd
75th Ave
75th Ave

43rd Ave

SURPRISE

Tuthill Rd

27th Ave

51st Ave
51st Ave

7th Ave

7th Ave

67th Ave

67th Ave

Citrus Rd

Rainbow Valley Rd

Cotton Ln

16th St

Dobson Rd
Alma School Rd

32nd St
32nd St

92ndSt
Dobson Rd

Â
?

Gilbert Rd

16th St

16th St

32nd St
Val Vista Dr

Bullard Ave

Bullard Ave

Cooper Rd

McDowel
l Mountain Rd

Power Rd
Recker Rd

80th St

Hawes Rd

McDow

Sossaman Rd

s Rd
P as
Usery

Mirage Rd

Ellsworth Rd

El

Crismon Rd

ve
99th A

Signal Butte Rd

27thAve

!
(

!
(

!
(

Map 2

0.851 - 1
1.01 - 1.5
1.51 - 2
2.01 - 2.66

!
(
!
(
!
(
!
(

Wild Horse
Dr

CMS 11

May 15, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

2 3 4 5 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterials

State Highways

0.75 - 0.85
!
(

CONGESTION

CONGESTION V/C
RATIO
FY 2011

APACHE JUNCTION
0 1

Meridian Rd

!
(

Mountain Rd

Forest Rd

Rd

Safety Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW & BACKGROUND

1

PURPOSE OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1

MCDOT Safety Management Procedures

1
1

ANALYSIS OF MCDOT’S SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FOR FY 2011-2012
Identifying and Ranking Low Cost Intersection Safety Improvements

1

SAFETY AUDIT PROGRAM

2

SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010

2

EVALUATION OF SAFETY

2

OVERALL COUNTY CRASH RATES

2

COUNTY CRASH STATISTICS

4

List of Tables
Table 1: Safety Improvement Projects Completed in FY 2011

3

Table 2: Planned Spot Safety Improvement Projects for FY 2012

3

Table 3. County Crash Rates 1998-2008

5

Table 4: Total Crashes 1998-2010

6

Table 5: Crashes per 100K Population 1998-2010

6

Table 6: County Fatalities 1998-2010

7

Table 7: County Fatalities Per 100K Population 1998-2010

7

Table 8: Number of Fatal Crashes by First Harmful Event 2007-2010

8

Table 9: Percent of Fatal Crashes by Collision Manner 2007-2010

9

Table 10: Number of Fatal Crashes by Driver Error 2007-2010

10

Table 11: Local, State, & National Fatality Rates Per 100 MVMT

11

Table 12: County Road Miles & Vehicle Miles of Travel 1998-2010

11

Table 13: Collision Manner for County Crashes 2007-2010

12

Table 14: Percent of County Driver Errors in Crashes for 2010

13

Table 15: Percent of County Crashes by First Harmful Event 2010

14

Table 16: County Injury Crashes 1998-2010

15

Table 17: County Injury Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010

15

Table 18: County Injury Severity 2007-2010

16

Table 19: County Single Vehicle Crashes 1998-2010

17

Table 20: County Single Vehicle Crashes Per 100k Population 1998-2010

17

Table 21: County Single Vehicle Crashes 2007-2010, Age of Driver & % of Crashes

18

Table 22: County Single Vehicle Crashes 2007-2010, By Percent of Driver Error

19

MCDOT

SMS

i

Safety Management System

List of Tables (continued)
Table 23: County Bicycle Crashes 1998-2010

20

Table 24: County Bicycle Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010

20

Table 25: County Bicycle Crashes by Age in 2010

21

Table 26: County Bicycle Crash Severity 2007-2010

21

Table 27: County Pedestrian Crashes 1998-2010

22

Table 28: County Pedestrian Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010

22

Table 29: Age of Pedestrians Involved in County Crashes in 2010

23

Table 30: Injury Severity for Pedestrians in County Crashes 2007-2010

23

Table 31: Type & Number of Motorcycle Crashes in the County 2009-2010

24

Table 32: Percent of Motorcycle Operator Errors for County Crashes in 2010

24

Table 33: Work Zone Crashes in the County 1998-2010

25

Table 34: Work Zone Crashes Per 100K Population in the County 1998-2010

25

List of Maps
Map 1: Safety Improvement Projects Completed in FY 2012

26

Map 2: Planned Safety Improvement Projects for FY 2013

27

Map 3: Location of all Crashes 2007-2010

28

Map 4: Location of Fatal Crashes 2007-2010

29

Map 5: Location of Bicycle Crashes 2007-2010

30

Map 6: Location of Pedestrian Crashes 2007-2010

31

SMS

ii

MCDOT

Safety Management System

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND
PURPOSE OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The County Safety Management System (SMS) is a systematic process that has
three goals:
x Document the roadway safety improvements made by Maricopa County during

the previous fiscal year.
x Identify the location, type, and severity of traffic crashes in the unincorporated

portions of Maricopa County.
x Report trends in traffic crashes and recommend improvements to reduce the

number and rate of crashes.
MCDOT Safety Management Procedures
MCDOT makes every effort to respond quickly to identified safety problems. These
problems are frequently identified through public complaints about unsafe roadway
conditions, first-hand observation by County staff members, and by reviewing
recent crash records for County roadways. When an actual problem or potential
problem is encountered, a detailed engineering analysis may be conducted with
recommendations made to correct the situation. These recommendations are
handled in three ways.
x Initially, through the MCDOT maintenance process for relatively simple and
inexpensive solutions.
x More complex problems are handled by the MCDOT’s Traffic Engineering
Division.
x Complex problems involving significant changes that require substantial funding
amounts are handled through the MCDOT’s Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP).
ANALYSIS OF MCDOT’S SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FOR FY 2012
Identifying and Ranking Intersection Safety Improvements
The most recent Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is used by
MCDOT as the guide to determine whether an identified safety problem meets the
criteria, also known as warrants, to move forward to become a project. The MUTCD
provides a guide to install multi-way stop control or traffic signals when it is
determined that five or more reported crashes at an intersection have occurred in a
12-month period, and are susceptible to correction by one or more traffic control
alternatives. Other warrant factors may also be used to determine if an intersection
needs improvements such as signalization, additional turn lanes, or other safety
items.
MCDOT

SMS

1

Safety Management System

SAFETY AUDIT PROGRAM
MCDOT Traffic Engineering is continuing its program to identify and evaluate
roadway conditions and to prioritize and schedule improvements for upcoming
years. This program is a continuation, at the local level, of the MAG initiative, also
known as the Safety Audit Program. This program ensures that the latest safety
standards are included in the designs for new roadways. A large percentage of
MCDOT roadways were constructed 20 to 30 years ago with the design standards
applicable at the time. The goal of this program is to be proactive in identifying those
areas where current design standards may be more applicable.
Criteria to determine priorities includes accident history, average daily traffic,
roadway function, posted speed, and already scheduled transportation improvement
projects. Accident history is used to evaluate the roadway and determine if
improvements are required. Accident locations are plotted as indicated on the
Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) accident reports. If five or more
correctable accidents are detected within a roadway segment or intersection and
occur within a 12 month period during the past three years, an engineering
evaluation follows to determine what action, if any, should to be taken. Once
projects meet the warrants criteria, projects are typically implemented in the order in
which they have been identified for improvement.
SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2009
In 2012, 13 projects were completed (Table 1). These were implemented by the
MCDOT Traffic Engineering Division. Ten projects were identified in FY 2013 for
completion (Table 2).
EVALUATION OF SAFETY
MCDOT is continuing its ongoing process of analyzing locations that exhibit
potential safety problems. The initial step each year is to examine the locations and
number of crashes, crash rates, injury severity, and the types of crashes occurring
on the roadways in unincorporated portion of Maricopa County.
OVERALL COUNTY CRASH RATES
Table 4 shows the relationship between the vehicle miles of travel per mile of
County Roadway and the total roadway miles in the County system through 2012.
This table shows that the miles of County roadways are continuously declining
primarily due to annexations, while the vehicle miles of travel on these remaining
SMS

2

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 1: Safety Improvement Projects Completed in FY 2012
Location

Project

1 Burton Avenue & 184th Avenue (Cortessa Elementary School)

School Crossing

2 Castle Hot Springs Road West & Rockaway Hills Dr

Multiway Stop

3 Daisy Mountain Drive & Dedication Way

New Signal

4 Daisy Mountain Drive & Hastings Way

New Signal

5 Daisy Mountain Drive & Meridian Drive

New Signal

6 Dobbins Road & 43rd Avenue

Multiway Stop

7 Glendale Avenue & Cotton Lane

Multiway Stop

8 Happy Valley Parkway & 115th Avenue

Signal Update

9 Lower Buckeye Road & Airport Road

Multiway Stop

10 MC 85 & Baseline Road

New Signal

11 MC 85 & Sarival Avenue

New Signal

12 Northern Avenue & Litchfield Road

Signal Update

13 Stardust Blvd. & 135th Avenue

New Signal

Table 2: Planned Spot Safety Improvement Projects for FY 2013
Location
1 Banff Lane: 75th Avenue - 79th Avenue
2 Baseline Road & Miller Road
3 Beloat Road & Jackrabbit Trail / Tuthill Road

Project
Traffic Calming
New Signal
Roadway Improvements

4 Elliot Road & Sossaman Road
5 Fire Station Driveway - North of Sun City Blvd.

New Signal
New Signal

6 Meeker Blvd. & Wilson Way

New Signal

7 Olive Avenue & Reems Road

New Signal

8 Olive Avenue & Sarival Avenue
9 R.H. Johnson Blvd. & Trail Ridge Drive

New Signal
New Signal

10 Southern Avenue & Meridian Road

New Signal

MCDOT

SMS

3

Safety Management System

roadways are constantly increasing. The net result is a slight increase in the
congestion on the County roads each year.
COUNTY CRASH STATISTICS
The overall County crash rate is the best indicator to represent the history of the
entire County system. The overall crash rate measures the number of crashes per
million vehicle miles of travel (VMT) per mile of County-owned roadway per year in
the unincorporated portions of the County. Table 3 shows that while the total
number of crashes in the unincorporated County has increased, the overall County
crash rate has declined when compared to the increase in population in the
unincorporated County. Since 1998 despite an increase of more than 53,000
people, more licensed drivers, and a rising number of miles traveled on County
roadways, the crash rates for all types of crashes has declined. Descriptive County
crash statistics are included in Tables 3-34.
The rate of all types of crashes in the unincorporated County in the 1998-2010
period has declined with respect to the population and miles traveled on County
roadways. Single vehicle crashes used to be the most common type but two years
ago they were exceeded by rear-end crashes. This trend mirrors the most common
crash type in the cities and towns and indicates that the unincorporated County is
becoming more urbanized.
Fatal crashes declined in FY 2010, due in part to the reduction of single vehicle
crashes. Single vehicle crashes are the most deadly and the reduction of this type
of crash is a welcome change. The fatality rate in the unincorporated County is now
only 1.13 crashes per million vehicle miles of travel. This is slightly below the
overall Arizona rate and is equal to the national rate. Bicycle and pedestrian
crashes in the unincorporated County are also declining, in keeping with the overall
national trend. Another important statistic tracked by the County is crashes in work
zones. This type of crash declined from 101 in 1998 to 79 in 2010, another
welcomed trend.

SMS

4

MCDOT

MCDOT
0.477
0.017
0.022
0.384
0.084
3,312
1,729
2,769
5.5297
1,997

1.58
0.486
0.014
0.022
0.350
0.054
3,200
1,592
2,829
5.1261
1,812

US Fatality Rate**

Single Vehicle Crash Rate*

Pedestrian Crash Rate*

Bicycle Crash Rate*

Injury Crash Rate*

Work Zone Related Rate*

Total MCDOT Crashes
Miles of County Owned Roads
That Have Traffic Counts

Total County Road Miles

Million Vehicle Miles/Day

2.18

2,070

5.6925

2,750

1,719

3,011

0.076

0.317

0.014

0.008

0.420

1.55

2.08

2.65

1.45

2000

2,260

6.0568

2,680

1,690

2,329

0.037

0.250

0.011

0.012

0.311

1.50

2.08

2.04

1.05

2001

2,256

6.0822

2,696

1,685

3,018

0.056

0.293

0.014

0.013

0.409

1.15

2.17

1.71

1.36

2002

2,435

6.5015

2,670

1,693

3,161

0.040

0.283

0.013

0.010

0.378

1.50

2.10

2.11

1.33

2003

2,543

6.6576

2,618

1,652

3,324

0.051

0.272

0.016

0.012

0.362

1.44

2.02

2.18

1.37

2004

2,456

6.4052

2,608

1,591

3,997

0.065

0.338

0.020

0.012

0.384

1.46

2.03

2.22

1.71

2005

2,421

6.2970

2,601

1,637

2,923

0.062

0.228

0.013

0.015

0.280

1.42

2.08

3.09

1.27

2006

1,937

5.0362

2,600

1,634

3,723

0.077

0.364

0.022

0.019

0.458

1.36

1.70

3.16

2.03

2007

1,802

4.5212

2,509

1,628

3,290

0.078

0.368

0.022

0.011

0.464

1.27

1.53

2.00

1.99

2008

2,311

5.5903

2,419

1,622

2,913

0.044

0.254

0.011

0.008

0.318

1.13

1.34

1.62

1.43

2009

2,573

6.0543

2,353

1,616

2,865

0.036

0.204

0.018

0.014

0.255

N/A

1.27

1.13

1.30

2010

SMS

5
53.10

101
85.79

169

775
393.40

655
344.37

44
22.34

41
21.56

35
17.77

29

962
488.32

909
477.92
15.25

69
35.03

54
28.39

62
31.47

47

48

873

27.01

55

23.58

34

39.65

82

267.41

553

12.09

25

12.57

26

332.21

687

21.76

45

16.44

34

57.62

124

302.04

650

13.94

30

13.94

30

421.47

907

17.66

38

15.80

44

43.32

95

305.97

671

14.59

32

10.94

24

409.03

897

22.80

50

20.06

48

53.02

123

285.34

662

16.38

38

12.07

28

378.88

879

22.84

53

20.69

49

67.47

152

351.09

791

20.86

47

11.98

27

398.58

898

23.08

52

21.75

65

61.74

143

225.82

523

13.39

31

12.09

28

278.07

644

30.66

71

28.07

54

58.92

141

279.98

670

17.13

41

12.95

31

351.44

841

24.24

58

22.57

31

52.96

129

249.18

607

15.19

37

9.44

23

314.04

765

13.55

33

12.73

29

36.78

90

211.69

518

9.40

23

7.36

18

265.22

649

13.49

33

11.85

** Fatalities Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles of Travel
Source: Crash data is from the Arizona Department of Transportation modified by MCDOT. Only crashes on County roadways are included.

77.60

158

323.67

659

14.24

29

8.35

17

428.78

* Crashes Per Million Vehicle Miles of Travel (MVMT)

Work Zone/100K Pop

Work Zone Related

Injury/100K Pop

Injury Crashes

Bicycle/100K Pop

Bicycle Crashes

Pedestrian/100K Pop

Pedestrian Crashes

Single Vehicle/100K Pop

Single Vehicle Crashes

MCDOT Fatalities/100K Pop

MCDOT Fatalities

Fatal/100K Pop

24.71

32.14

79

183.48

451

15.87

39

12.20

30

229.05

563

10.17

25

9.76

24

1,682.4 1,681.2 1,478.9 1,126.2 1,402.4 1,441.4 1,432.8 1,774.1 1,262.1 1,555.8 1,350.6 1,190.4 1,165.6

Crashes Per 100K Pop

Fatal Crashes

190,200 197,000 203,600 206,800 215,200 219,300 232,000 225,300 231,600 239,300 243,600 244,700 245,801

MCDOT Population

% Network with Traffic Counts 56.27% 62.44% 62.51% 63.06% 62.50% 63.41% 63.10% 61.00% 62.94% 62.85% 64.89% 67.05% 68.68%

VMT/Mile

1.55

2.15

Arizona Fatality Rate**

1.64
3.42

1.71
2.89

1999

MCDOT Fatality Rate**

1998

Annual MCDOT Crash Rate*

Factors

Safety Management System

Table 3. County Crash Rates 1998-2010

Safety Management System

Table 4: Total Crashes 1998-2010
Total Crashes 1998-2010
4,500
4,000
3,500

Crashes

3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Years
Total MCDOT Crashes

Linear (Total MCDOT Crashes)

Table 5: Crashes per 100K Population 1998-2010
Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
2,000
1,800
1,600

Crash Rate

1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Years
Crashes Per 100K Pop

SMS

6

Linear (Crashes Per 100K Pop)

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 6: County Fatalities 1998-2010
Fatalities 1998-2010
80
70
60

Fatalities

50
40
30
20
10
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

Years
MCDOT Fatalities

Linear (MCDOT Fatalities)

Table 7: County Fatalities Per 100K Population 1998-2010
Fatalities Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
40
35

Fatality Rate

30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Years
MCDOT Fatalities/100K Pop

MCDOT

Linear (MCDOT Fatalities/100K Pop)

SMS

7

Safety Management System

Table 8: Number of Fatal Crashes by First Harmful Event 2007-2010

SMS

8

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 9: Percent of Fatal Crashes by Collision Manner 2007-2010

MCDOT

SMS

9

Safety Management System

Table 10: Number of Fatal Crashes by Driver Error 2007-2010

SMS

10

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 11: Local, State, & National Fatality Rates Per 100 MVMT
Local, State, & National Fatality Rates\100M VMT
4.0
3.5
3.0

Fatality Rate

2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Years
MCDOT Fatality Rate**

Arizona Fatality Rate**

Linear (MCDOT Fatality Rate**)

Linear (MCDOT Fatality Rate**)

US Fatality Rate**

Table 12: County Road Miles & Vehicle Miles of Travel 1998-2010
MCDOT Road Miles & Vehicle Miles of Travel
3,000
2,800
2,600

Miles

2,400
2,200
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Years
VMT/Mile

MCDOT

Total County Road Miles

SMS

11

Safety Management System

Table 13: Collision Manner for County Crashes 2007-2010

Collision Manner 2007-2010
1,200

Number of Crashes

1,000

800

600

400

200

0
Rear End

Single
Vehicle

Left Turn Sideswipe
Angle
Same
Crash not
Direction
left turn

Other

Head On Sideswipe Unknown
Opposite
Dir

Rear to
Side

Rear to
Rear

Collision Manner
2007

SMS

12

2008

2009

2010

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 14: Percent of County Driver Errors in Crashes for 2010

MCDOT

SMS

13

Safety Management System

Table 15: Percent of County Crashes by First Harmful Event 2010

SMS

14

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 16: County Injury Crashes 1998-2010
Injury Crashes 1998-2010
900
800
700

Crashes

600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

SMS

15

Years
Injury Crashes

Linear (Injury Crashes)

Table 17: County Injury Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010
Injury Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
450
400
350

Crash Rate

300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Years
Injury/100K Pop

MCDOT

Linear (Injury/100K Pop)

Safety Management System

Table 18: County Injury Severity 2007-2010

Injury Severity 2007-2010

2,400
2,100

Number of Crashes

1,800
1,500
1,200
900
600
300
0
No Injury

Possible Injury

2007

SMS

16

Non
Incapacitating
Injury
2008

2009

Incapacitating
Injury

Fatal

2010

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 19: County Single Vehicle Crashes 1998-2010
Single Vehicle Crashes 1998-2010
1,200

1,000

Crashes

800

600

400

200

0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Years
Single Vehicle Crashes

Linear (Single Vehicle Crashes)

Table 20: County Single Vehicle Crashes Per 100k Population 1998-2010
Single Vehicle Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
600

500

Crash Rate

400

300

200

100

0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Years
Single Vehicle/100K Pop

MCDOT

Linear (Single Vehicle/100K Pop)

SMS

17

Safety Management System

Table 21: County Single Vehicle Crashes 2007-2010, Age of Driver & % of Crashes

SMS

18

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 22: County Single Vehicle Crashes 2007-2010, By Percent of Driver Error

MCDOT

SMS

19

Safety Management System

Table 23: County Bicycle Crashes 1998-2010
Bicycle Crashes 1998-2010
50
45
40

Crashes

35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2009

2010

Years
Bicycle Crashes

Linear (Bicycle Crashes)

Table 24: County Bicycle Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010
Bicycle Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
24

21

Crash Rate

18

15

12

9

6

3

0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Years
Bicycle/100K Pop

SMS

20

Linear (Bicycle/100K Pop)

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 25: County Bicycle Crashes by Age in 2010

Table 26: County Bicycle Crash Severity 2007-2010

MCDOT

SMS

21

Safety Management System

Table 27: County Pedestrian Crashes 1998-2010
Pedestrian Crashes 1998-2010
40
35
30

Crashes

25
20
15
10
5
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2009

2010

Years
Pedestrian Crashes

Linear (Pedestrian Crashes)

Table 28: County Pedestrian Crashes Per 100K Population 1998-2010
Pedestrian Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
20
18
16

Crash Rate

14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Years
Pedestrian/100K Pop

SMS

22

Linear (Pedestrian/100K Pop)

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 29: Age of Pedestrians Involved in County Crashes in 2010

Age of Pedestrians Involved in Crashes in 2010
5

Number of Pedestrians

4

3

2

1

0
0Ͳ10

11Ͳ20

21Ͳ30

31Ͳ40

41Ͳ50

51Ͳ60

61Ͳ70

71Ͳ80

81Ͳ99

Age of Pedestrians

Table 30: Injury Severity for Pedestrians in County Crashes 2007-2010
Injury Severity for Pedestrian Crashes 2007-2010
11
10

Number of Pedestrians

9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Fatal

Incapacitating
Injury
2007

MCDOT

Non
Incapacitating
Injury
2008

2009

Possible Injury

No Injury

2010

SMS

23

Safety Management System

Table 31: Type & Number of Motorcycle Crashes in the County 2009-2010
Type & No. of Motorcycle Crashes 2009-2010
70
65
60
55

Number of Crashes

50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Single
Vehicle

Rear End

Angle Crash
not left turn

Left Turn

2009

Sideswipe
Same
Direction

Head On

Other

Unknown

2010

Table 32: Percent of Motorcycle Operator Errors for County Crashes in 2010
Percent of Motorcycle Operator Errors in 2010
40%

39.4%

35%

Percent of Operator Errors

30%

SMS

25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%

24

10.9% 10.3%
9.1%

8.5%
3.6% 3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2.4%

2.4%

1.8%

1.8%

MCDOT

Safety Management System

Table 33: Work Zone Crashes in the County 1998-2010
Work Zone Crashes 1998-2010
180
160
140

Crashes

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

YEARS
Work Zone Related

Linear (Work Zone Related)

Table 34: Work Zone Crashes Per 100K Population in the County 1998-2010
Work Zone Crashes Per 100K Pop 1998-2010
100
90
80

Crash Rate

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

YEARS
Work Zone/100K Pop

MCDOT

Linear (Work Zone/100K Pop)

SMS

25

$
a
"
!

Castle Hot Springs Road
West & Rockaway Hills Dr

v
I

Í
?

$
"
!

8
9
O
N
M
L
:

Ç
Æ
Å

8
9
O
N
M
L
:

8
9
O
N
M
L
:

Lower Buckeye
Road &
Airport Road

$
!
"Aÿ

$
a
"
!

AVONDALE

ß
A

Dobbins
Road &
43rd Avenue

TOLLESON

ß
A

MC85 & Sarival Avenue

85

7
5
6
4

LITCHFIELD PARK

ë
é
è

GLENDALE

EL MIRAGE

v
I

Happy Valley
Parkway &
115th Avenue

Stardust
Blvd. &
135th Avenue

ë
é
è

PEORIA

Northern Avenue
YOUNGTOWN
& Litchfield Road

MC 85 & Baseline Road

$
"
!

BUCKEYE

Glendale
Avenue &
Cotton Lane

Burton Avenue & 184th
Avenue (Cortessa
Elementary School)

SURPRISE

Â
?

$
"
!

Daisy Mountain Drive
& Meridian Drive

$
c
"
!

PHOENIX

PHOENIX

¸
?

Daisy Mountain
Drive &
Dedication Tr

$
c
"
!

9
O
N
M
L
:
9
O8
N
M
L
:
8
9
O8
N
M
L
:

$
a
"
!

ñ
A

$
a
"
!

á
A

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

ñ
A

ñ
A

Ð
?

SCOTTSDALE

CHANDLER

ß
A

ß
A

CAREFREE

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

CAVE CREEK

Daisy Mountain
Drive &
Hastings Way

Maricopa County

Signal Update

School Crossing

New Signal

Multiway Stop

SMS 26

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles

$
!
"
8
9
O
N
M
L
:
Ç
Æ
Å
ë
é
è

Safety Improvement
Projects Completed
in FY 2012

Map 1

Baseline Road
& Miller Road

BUCKEYE

Olive Avenue
& Sarival
Avenue

EL MIRAGE

Meeker Blvd.
& Wilson Way

GOODYEAR

LITCHFIELD PARK

GLENDALE

AVONDALE

Fire Station Driveway North of Sun City Blvd.

YOUNGTOWN

Olive
Avenue &
Reems Road

Beloat Road &
Jackrabbit Trail
/ Tuthill Road

SURPRISE

R.H. Johnson Blvd. &
Trail Ridge Drive

TOLLESON

PEORIA

Banff Lane:
75th Avenue 79th Avenue

PHOENIX

PHOENIX

CAREFREE

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

PARADISE VALLEY

CAVE CREEK

CHANDLER

SCOTTSDALE

GILBERT

Elliot Road &
Sossaman Road

MESA

FOUNTAIN HILLS

QUEEN CREEK

SMS 27

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles

Traffic Calming

Roadway Improvements

New Signal

APACHE JUNCTION

Southern
Avenue &
Meridian Road

I
H
F
G

8
9
O
N
M
L
:

Improvement Projects For FY 2013

Planned Spot Safety

Planned Spot
Safety Improvement Projects
for FY 2013

Map 2

er R
Hyd

539th Ave

en
te

Rd

Peoria Ave YOUNGTOWN
Pain
ted
Olive Ave

Waddell Rd

EL MIRAGE

Baseline Rd
Eagletail Rd
Dobbins Rd
Elliot Rd
Narramore Rd

Southern Ave

Su
n
Blv rise
d

387th Ave

Rd

Bell Rd

$̀
"
!

ß
A
GILA BEND

Í
?

$
a
"
!

9th
31

331st Ave

Dobbins Rd

MARICOPA UNINCORPORATED

v
I

Elliot Rd
Narramore Rd

McDowell
Rd

Carefree
Hwy

Indian Rd

v
I

Wilson
Ave

Woods
Rd

Í
?

Beloat Rd

EL MIRAGE

LITCHFIELD PARK

7
5
6
4
85

Patterson
Rd

$
a
"
!

AVONDALE

Olive Ave
GLENDALE

GOODYEAR

PEORIA

YOUNGTOWN

Van Buren St

ÿ
A

Bell Rd

Riggs Rd

Elliot Rd

BUCKEYE

SURPRISE

Â
?

Reems Rd

491st Ave

491st Ave

Bullard Ave
Litchfield Rd

v
I
A
ß

Mesa

Carefree Hwy

le
Tab

TOLLESON

PHOENIX

PHOENIX

d

Baseline Rd

$
c
"
!

¸
?

Union Hills Dr

Be
ltlin
eR

Northern Ave

Greenway Rd

ß
A

$
c
"
!

43rd Ave
27th Ave

Cloud Rd

Rd

Ag
ua
Ca
li

d

Lahman Rd

579th Ave

Indian School Rd

El Mirage Rd

411th Ave

411th
Ave

Camelback
Rd

107th Ave

Centennial Rd
Van Buren
Courthouse Rd
St
Buckeye Rd

555th
Citrus
RdAve
Cotton Ln

SURPRISE

571st Ave

rprise
Ente

Sarival Ave

91st Ave

355th Ave
67th Ave

Johnson Rd

Ave

99th Ave
99th Ave

51st Ave
91st Ave
83rd Ave
75th Ave
67th Ave
51st Ave

83rd Ave

7th Ave
7th St

ñ
A
$
a
"
!

y Dr

Bell Rd

TEMPE

Riggs Rd

Ì
?

ó
A

$
a
"
!

Hunt Hwy

ñ
A

ì
A

v
I

MESA

GILBERT

Southern Ave

j?
A
Ð

Ð
?

FOUNTAIN HILLS

Brown
Rd

?
Ð
ñ
A

SCOTTSDALE

CHANDLER

ß
A

ß
A

GUADALUPE

$
a
"
!

á
A

Thomas Rd
McDowell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

Deer Valle

CAREFREE

Carefree
Hwy

CAVE CREEK

32nd St

WICKENBURG

Tuthill Rd

16th St

32nd St

7th St
16th
St C

ave

C re
ek
Rd
32nd St

92nd St

Dobson Rd

v
I

83rd Ave
75th Ave

203rd Ave

219th Ave

ow Valley Rd
inb
Ra

Gila
Blvd

Cooper Rd
Gilbert Rd

¿
?

Bullard Ave

Val Vista Dr

Citrus Rd

Ð
?

Pass R d

Ð
?

Empire Blvd

QUEEN CREEK

Germann Rd

Ñ
?

v
I

Broadway Ave

Ð
?

APACHE JUNCTION

Meridian Rd

Warner Rd

Usery

Rd
nt
Hu
y
Hw

91st
Ave

am
Rock D

Power Rd

ü
A

Æ
?

10 Miles

SMS 28

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

012345

Maricopa County

Arterials

State Highways

Crashes 2007-2010

LOCATIONS OF
ALL CRASHES
2007-2010

Map 3

579th Ave

er R
Hyd

Ag
ua
Ca
li

d

387th Ave

en
te

539th Ave

Rd

Pain
ted

Rd

Elliot Rd
Narramore Rd

355th Ave

Dobbins Rd

GILA BEND

Í
?

MARICOPA UNINCORPORATED

$̀
"
!

331st Ave
339th Ave

Broadway Rd

$
a
"
!
Johnson Rd

491st Ave

523rd
Ave

Southern Ave

Wintersburg
Rd

9th
31

Baseline Rd

Carefree
Hwy

Woods
Rd

Wilson Ave

Cloud Rd

v
I

Í
?

Beloat Rd

Southern Ave

Elliot Rd

BUCKEYE

Thomas
Rd

Riggs Rd

LITCHFIELD PARK

85

7
5
6
4

Van Buren St

Patterson
Rd

$
a
"
!

AVONDALE

Olive Ave

v
I
A
ß

Beardsley Rd

EL MIRAGE

GLENDALE

GOODYEAR

PEORIA

YOUNGTOWN

Bell Rd

Â
?

McDowell Rd

ÿ
A

Glendale Ave

SURPRISE

Citrus Rd

v
I

Dean Rd

491st Ave

Baseline Rd Dobbins Rd
Eagletail Rd Elliot
Rd
Narramore Rd

555th Ave

Bruner Rd

203rd
Ave
Airport Rd

203rd Ave

411th Ave

411th
Ave

Jackrabbit Tr
Tuthill Rd

ge
R
ira

WICKENBURG

TOLLESON

91st Ave

El
M

d
107th Ave

99th Ave
99th Ave

Sarival Ave
Reems Rd

91st Ave
83rd Ave

le
Tab

Mesa

Rd

Carefree Hwy

$
c
"
!

Thomas Rd

Northern Ave

Peoria Ave

Greenway Rd

ß
A

Desert Hills Dr

PHOENIX

PHOENIX

ltlin
e

SURPRISE

Be

Rd

Broadway Rd
Southern Ave
Baseline Rd

$
c
"
!

¸
?

Union Hills Dr

Elliot Rd Dobbins Rd
Estrella Dr

83rd Ave

ß
A

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

Dr

j?
A
Ð

Olive Ave

AEL MIRAGE
ó

Ì
?

ñ
A

v
I

MESA

GILBERT

Southern Ave

Brown
Rd

FOUNTAIN HILLS

San Tan Blvd

Talisman Rd

ß
A

r

Bell Rd A
ì
$Hutton D
a
"
!

Beardsley Rd

Hunt Hwy

Ð
?

CHANDLER

Rd

t t Da
rtle m Rd
Ba

Rio Verde Dr

?
Ð
ñ
A

SCOTTSDALE

Peoria Ave YOUNGTOWN

Waddell Rd

Greenway Rd

Deer Valley

Riggs Rd

Elliot Rd
!Warner
$
a
"
Rd

á
A

McDowell Rd

ß
Indian School Rd A
ñ
A
$
a
"
!

Bell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

Deer Valle

CAREFREE

y Dr

CAVE CREEK

32nd St

er
51st Ave

51st Ave

144th St

Riv

Ne
w
83rd Ave
75th Ave
67th Ave
67th
Ave

32nd St

27th
Ave

43rd Ave
27th Ave

7th Ave
7th St
16th St

Ca
ve
16th St

92nd St

Alma School Rd

C re
ek
Rd
32nd St

Sunri
se
Blvd

Camelback
Rd
Thomas Indian School Rd
Centennial Rd
Rd
McDowell Rd
Salome
Van Buren
Van Buren St
Hw
St
Buckeye Rd
y
Buckeye Rd

Lahman Rd

571st Ave

80th St

Horses
h

Val Vista Dr

Val Vista
Dr

331st Ave

Gila Blvd

Power Rd

¿
?

Bullard Ave

v
I

Bush

Ð
?
Hwy

Ð
?

Ñ
?

v
I

Broadway Ave

Ð
?

APACHE JUNCTION

Empire Blvd

QUEEN CREEK

Germann Rd

Ellsworth Rd

oeD
am
Recker Rd

Hawes Rd
Usery
Pass Rd

Sossaman
Hawes Rd Rd

7th Ave
7th St

Citrus Rd
Cotton Ln

Ave

e Rd
rpris

Bullard Ave
Litchfield Rd

Cooper Rd
Gilbert Rd

107th Ave

Dobson Rd
Mirage Rd

Sarival Ave

Old El Mirage Rd

Ente

Dysart Rd

El

91st Ave

ow Valley Rd
inb
Ra

83rd Ave
75th Ave

Meridian Rd
Mountain Rd

Rd
67th Ave

Forest Rd

nt
Hu
y
Hw

91st
Ave

am
Rock D

ü
A

Æ
?

10 Miles

SMS 29

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

012345

Maricopa County

Arterials

State Highways

Fatal Crashes 2007-2010

LOCATIONS OF
FATAL CRASHES
2007-2010

Map 4

579th Ave

er R
Hyd

491st Ave

491st Ave

539th Ave

523rd
Ave

Southern Ave

en
te

Rd

Baseline Rd
Eagletail Rd Elliot Dobbins Rd
Rd
Narramore Rd

Ag
ua
Ca
li

d

y

387th Ave

Pain
ted

Rd

Elliot Rd
Narramore Rd

Camelback
Rd
Thomas Indian School Rd
Centennial Rd
Rd
McDowell
Van Buren
Rd
St
Buckeye Rd

Hw

411th Ave

Rd

Wintersburg

Cloud Rd

Dobbins Rd

355th Ave
339th Ave

$̀
"
!

GILA BEND

Í
?

MARICOPA UNINCORPORATED

411th
Ave

$
a
"
!

Baseline Rd

Carefree
Hwy

Woods
Rd

Í
?

Beloat Rd

Southern Ave

Elliot Rd

BUCKEYE

Thomas
Rd

Riggs Rd

EL MIRAGE

LITCHFIELD PARK

GLENDALE

85

7
5
6
4

Patterson
Rd

$
a
"
!

AVONDALE

es a
Tab le M

I
v
ß
A

TOLLESON

Southern Ave

Van Buren St

GOODYEAR

PEORIA

YOUNGTOWN

Bell Rd

Â
?

McDowell Rd

ÿ
A

Glendale Ave

SURPRISE

Citrus Rd

lom
e

555th Ave

Bruner
Rd

331st Ave

319th 331st Ave
Ave
Johnson Rd

Gila Blvd

v
I

Wilson Ave

203rd
Ave
Airport Rd

203rd Ave

Jackrabbit Tr

v
I

Bullard Ave

Tuthill Rd

Sarival Ave
Reems Rd

d
ge
R
ira
El
M
128th
Ave

Rd

Carefree Hwy

$
c
"
!

Thomas Rd

$
c
"
!
PHOENIX

¸
?

Union Hills Dr

PHOENIX

d

SURPRISE

Be
ltlin
eR

Baseline Rd
Elliot Rd Dobbins Rd
Estrella Dr

Broadway Rd

Northern Ave

Peoria Ave

Greenway Rd

ß
A

51st Ave

WICKENBURG

83rd Ave

El Mirage Rd

er
Riv

Ne
w
83rd Ave
75th Ave
67th Ave
67th
Ave

ß
A

TEMPE

GUADALUPE

Dr

B
er lvd

Olive Ave

ì
A

Beardsley Rd

Riggs Rd

Bell!
$
a
"
Rd
Burns

j?
A
Ð

AEL MIRAGE
ó

Ì
?

ñ
A

v
I

MESA

GILBERT

Southern Ave

Brown
Rd

FOUNTAIN HILLS

Hunt Hwy

Ð
?

CHANDLER

t t Da
rtle m Rd
Ba

Rio Verde Dr

?
Ð
ñ
A

SCOTTSDALE

Peoria Ave YOUNGTOWN

Waddell Rd

Greenway Rd

ek
Me

Deer Valley

Warner Rd

$
a
"
!

á
A

McDowell Rd

ß
Indian School Rd A
ñ
A
$
a
"
!

Bell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

Deer Valle

CAREFREE

y Dr

CAVE CREEK

144th St

Rd
51st Ave

107th Ave
91st Ave
83rd Ave

91st Ave

43rd Ave
27th Ave

Sa

Lahman Rd

571st Ave

16th St

99th Ave
99th Ave

27t
h

Ave
7th Ave
7th St

Citrus Rd
Cotton Ln

32nd St

7th Ave
7th St
16th St
16th St

32nd St
Cre
ek
Rd

Ca
ve
32nd St

Sunri
se
Blvd
Sarival Ave

Rd
oeD
am
Recker Rd

Power Rd

¿
?

Bullard Ave
Litchfield Rd

ß
A

v
I

Ð
?
Goldfi
eld
Rd
Hwy
Bush
Hawes Rd

Empire Blvd

Cloud Rd

QUEEN CREEK

Germann Rd

Sossaman
Hawes Rd Rd

92nd St

Alma School Rd

Dobson Rd
Mirage Rd
Ave

12
8th
Dysart Rd

Alma School
Rd

Old El Mirage Rd

Usery
Pass Rd

Ellsworth Rd

Horses
h

Val Vista Dr

Dr

Mountain Rd

Ð
?

Ñ
?

v
I

Broadway Ave

Ð
?

APACHE JUNCTION

Meridian Rd

Cooper Rd
Gilbert Rd
107th Ave
111th Ave

e Rd
rpris

103rd Ave
99th Ave

El

91st Ave

Ente

83rd Ave
75th Ave

ow Valley Rd
inb
Ra

67th Ave

Forest Rd

nt
Hu
y
Hw

91st
Ave

am
Rock D

ü
A

Æ
?

10 Miles

SMS 30

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

012345

Maricopa County

Arterials

State Highways

Bicycle Crashes 2007-2010

LOCATIONS OF
BICYCLE CRASHES
2007-2010

Map 5

579th Ave

er R
Hyd

en
te

539th Ave

Rd

Pain
ted

Rd

Elliot Rd
Narramore Rd

$̀
"
!

GILA BEND

Í
?

MARICOPA UNINCORPORATED

Dobbins Rd

Broadway Rd

355th Ave
339th Ave

491st Ave

523rd
Ave

Southern Ave

Rd

Wintersburg

491st Ave

Baseline Rd
Eagletail Rd Elliot Dobbins Rd
Rd
Narramore Rd

Ag
ua
Ca
li

d

387th Ave

Camelback
Rd
Thomas Indian School Rd
Centennial Rd
Rd
McDowell Rd
Salome
Van Buren
Hw
St
Buckeye Rd
y

555th Ave

$
a
"
!

Baseline Rd

Carefree
Hwy

Woods
Rd

Bruner
Rd

411th Ave

411th
Ave

Í
?

Beloat Rd

Southern Ave

Elliot Rd

BUCKEYE

SURPRISE

Riggs Rd

$
a
"
!

AVONDALE

I
v
ß
A

TOLLESON

Southern Ave

Van Buren St

7
5
6
4
85

LITCHFIELD PARK

es a
Tab le M

Beardsley Rd

EL MIRAGE

GLENDALE

Patterson
Rd

PEORIA

YOUNGTOWN

Bell Rd

Â
?

GOODYEAR

ÿ
A

Citrus Rd
Perryville Rd
Cotton Ln

Cloud Rd

Dean Rd

331st Ave

319th 331st Ave
Ave
Johnson Rd

Gila Blvd

Tuthill Rd

v
I

Wilson Ave

203rd
Ave
Airport Rd

203rd Ave

Sarival Ave
Reems Rd

ge
R

d
107th Ave

v
I

Bullard Ave

Jackrabbit Tr

El
M

ira
El Mirage Rd

WICKENBURG

91st Ave

Rd

Carefree Hwy

Northern Ave

Peoria Ave

Greenway Rd

ß
A

$
c
"
!

Thomas Rd

16th St
PHOENIX

Cloud Rd

Desert Hills Dr

27th
Ave
7th Ave

d

SURPRISE

Be
ltlin
eR

Baseline Rd
d
Carver R

PHOENIX

¸
?

Union Hills Dr

$
c
"
!

43rd Ave
27th Ave

91st Ave
83rd Ave

83rd Ave

51st Ave

51st Ave

99th Ave
99th Ave

Rd
er
Riv

Ne
w
83rd Ave
75th Ave
67th Ave
67th
Ave

ß
A

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

Dr

j?
A
Ð

Olive Ave

Bell Rd

AEL MIRAGE
ó

Ì
?

ñ
A

v
I

MESA

GILBERT

Southern Ave

Brown
Rd

FOUNTAIN HILLS

ì
A

ß
A

Thunderbird
Blvd

$
a
"
!

Beardsley Rd

Hunt Hwy

Ð
?

CHANDLER

t t Da
rtle m Rd
Ba

Rio Verde Dr

?
Ð
ñ
A

SCOTTSDALE

Peoria Ave YOUNGTOWN

Waddell Rd

Greenway Rd

Deer Valley

Riggs Rd

$Warner Rd
a
"
!

á
A

McDowell Rd

ß
Indian School Rd A
ñ
A
$
a
"
!

Bell Rd

PARADISE VALLEY

¸
?

CAREFREE

y Dr

CAVE CREEK

Deer Valle

32nd St

Sunri
se
Blvd

7th Ave
7th St

Citrus Rd
Cotton Ln

32nd St
Cre
ek
Rd

Ca
ve
32nd St

7th St
16th
St

16th St
16th St

92nd St

Alma School Rd

Dobson Rd
Ave

12
8th

Lahman Rd

571st Ave

Old El Mirage Rd

144th St

107th Ave

¿
?

Bullard Ave
Litchfield Rd

e Rd
rpris

111th Ave

El Mirage Rd

Sarival Ave

ve
99th A

103rd Ave

Dysart Rd

Cooper Rd
Gilbert Rd

Rd
oeD
am
Horses
h

Val Vista Dr

Val Vista
Dr

v
I

B

wy
ush H

Ð
?

Empire Blvd

Cloud Rd

QUEEN CREEK

Ð
?

Ñ
?

v
I

Broadway Ave

Ð
?

APACHE JUNCTION

Apache Tr

Usery
Pass Rd

Ellsworth Rd
Crismon
Rd

Hawes Rd

80th St
Hawes Rd

Mountain Rd

Meridian Rd

Power Rd

Recker Rd
Power Rd
Sossaman
Rd

91st Ave

Ente

83rd Ave
75th Ave

ow Valley Rd
inb
Ra

67th Ave

Forest Rd

nt
Hu
y
Hw

91st
Ave

am
Rock D

ü
A

Æ
?

10 Miles

SMS 31

May 10, 2012

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

I

012345

Maricopa County

Arterials

State Highways

Pedestrian Crashes 2007-2010

LOCATIONS OF
PEDESTRIAN CRASHES
2007-2010

Map 6

Low Volume Road Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LOW VOLUME ROAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1

OVERVIEW

1

BACKGROUND

1

COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM

1

Facts About County Unpaved Roads

2
2

TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD EVALUATION CRITERIA

List of Tables
Table 1: Low Volume Roads Completed or Underway in FY 2012

4

List of Figures
Figure 1: MCDOT Dirt Road Paving History 1983-2012

MCDOT

6

LVR

i

Low Volume Road Management System

LOW VOLUME ROAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) in FY 2000 initiated a
formal program to pave low volume roads (LVR) in the County. A multi-year capital
improvement program for paving low traffic volume dirt roadways was then created and
implemented.
OVERVIEW
This report documents the number and miles of low volume roads paved by MCDOT in
Fiscal Year 2011. It also provides an historical picture of all MCDOT low volume road
paving since1983.
BACKGROUND
Prior to 2004 MCDOT paved low volume roads primarily based on citizen complaints
and field observations by MCDOT staff. However, beginning in 2004, MCDOT initiated
a program to systematically identify low volume dirt roadways for paving. Unpaved
roads with high or increasing traffic volumes, safety issues, or other significant
concerns were to be considered for paving. This program was to specifically address
those unpaved roads that do not meet federal criteria for paving under the PM-10
(federal dust abatement) program. The Maricopa County Transportation Advisory
Board (TAB) recommended to the Board of Supervisors that an annual allocation of 3
to 4 million dollars per year be set aside to in the MCDOT annual budget to pave
selected LVR’s.
COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM
In FY 2010 Maricopa County owned or maintained 2,353 miles of roadways. These
roads are located in the unincorporated parts of the County, which includes both urban
or near urban conditions as well as rural locations.
There are five different types of unpaved roads in Maricopa County:
x
x
x
x
x
LVR

Roads that are owned by the County and identified as open and declared. This
means the County owns right-of-way for these segments of road and has
accepted the roadway into the County System.
Roads that are partially opened and declared. These are roads where part of
the right-of-way is owned by the County.
Primitive roads. These roads are usually located in remote parts of the County
and are accessing wilderness areas and are typically less developed than other
areas.
Courtesy grade roads. These roads are existing unpaved roads with little or no
County owned right-of-way, but maintained by MCDOT through historical
precedent and allowed by state statute.
Unpaved roads not owned or maintained by the County.
1

MCDOT

Low Volume Road Management System

Facts About County Unpaved Roads
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

803 miles of unpaved roads are within unincorporated Maricopa County.
166 of these miles are considered open and declared by the County.
218 of these miles are courtesy graded by the County.
7 of these miles are partially owned by the County.
360 of these miles are unpaved roads that are neither owned by the County nor
courtesy graded by the County, but serve growing areas.
52 miles of these roads are primitive roads, accessing remote parts of the County.
597 road segments connect directly to a paved road.
230 miles of unpaved roads are inside the PM10 area and 573 miles of unpaved
roads are outside the PM10 area.
164 miles of unpaved road segments are adjacent to or surrounded by an
incorporated city or town boundary.

TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD EVALUATION CRITERIA
A comprehensive inventory of the unpaved roads system builds on the updated base
map and centerline file was created in 2008. Evaluation criteria was then inserted into
the database for each unpaved road segment. The data for the evaluation criteria are
important because they provide a descriptive picture of each unpaved road segment.
The criteria used by the TAB is listed below.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

The Board of Supervisor District the segment is located in.
The length of the roadway segment (miles).
Is the road segment located inside or outside the PM10 area?
Is the road segment County maintained or not?
The Major Streets and Routes Plan classification.
The average daily traffic count.
Does the road segment connect to an existing paved road?
The percent of estimated right-of-way owned by MCDOT.
Does the segment serve a public facility?
Are there any safety concerns (high accident rate for instance)?
The cost per mile to pave.
The total project cost.

Additional Criteria
In addition to the TAB evaluation criteria, MCDOT staff collected data on the following
information for each roadway segment:
x How many small washes cross the road segment?
x How many large washes or rivers cross the road segment?
MCDOT

LVR

2

Low Volume Road Management System

x
x
x
x
x
x

Are there any major utilities within close proximity?
How many public facilities are in the vicinity of a given road segment.
Crash data for a three year period.
The general land ownership where the road segment is located.
The distance to the nearest paved road.
What is the nearest or adjacent city?

LVR

3

MCDOT

MCDOT

ROAD NAME
191st Avenue - Jomax Road to Roadrunner Road
193rd Avenue - Jomax Road to Pinnacle Vista Alignment
Jomax Road - 207th Avenue to 203rd Avenue
Mitchell Road - Bradley Road to Radford Road
Roadrunner Road - 193rd Avenue to 191st Avenue
6th Street - BOM to EOM
7th Avenue - Saddle Mountain Road to EOM
16th Street - Honda Bow Road to Cavalry Road
22nd Street - Cavalry Road to EOM
Circle Mountain Road - 13th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Dove Valley Road - 10th Street to 12th Street
Peak View Road - 58th Street to 60th Street
Perdiz Drive - BOM to New River Road
Pinnacle Vista Drive - 40th Street to 42nd Street
Sabrosa Drive - New River Road to 6th Street
Saddle Mountain Road - New River Road to 12th Street
Venado Drive - New River Road to 6th Street
Watkins Street - Airport Road to 203rd Avenue
Watson Road - MC 85 to Buckeye Canal Service Road

ROAD NAME
43rd Ave - Choppo Rd to Galveston St
45th Ave - Dusty Ln to Montery St
45th Ave - Monterey St to Ivanhoe St
45th Ave - Ivanhoe St to Ivanhoe St
Choppo Rd - Dusty Ln to 43rd Ave
Dusty Ln - Galveston St to Choppo Rd
Galveston St - Dusty Ln to 43rd Ave
Ivanhoe St - 45th Ave to End of Road
Monterey St - 45th Ave to End of Road

Length (ft) WIDTH
581.60
24
485.81
24
667.42
24
528.00
24
696.95
24
798.14
24
1,196.81
24
1,232.23
24
930.11
24
7,117.08
Miles
1.35
Length (ft) WIDTH
1,286.16
24
3,912.17
24
2,556.77
24
1,297.94
24
1,324.01
24
3,288.58
24
792.00
24
2,607.31
24
916.63
24
2,568.96
24
1,286.05
24
1,333.58
24
541.52
24
1,277.03
24
2,951.51
24
1,832.34
24
3,094.78
24
2,489.66
24
1,289.56
24
36,646.58
Miles
6.94
SQ.YDS.
3,429.75
10,432.46
6,818.05
3,461.18
3,530.70
8,769.55
2,112.00
6,952.83
2,444.33
6,850.56
3,429.47
3,556.21
1,444.05
3,405.42
7,870.70
4,886.25
8,252.76
6,639.10
3,438.84
97,724.21

SQ.YDS.
1,550.94
1,295.50
1,779.79
1,408.00
1,858.55
2,128.37
3,191.50
3,285.94
2,480.29
18,978.89
STATUS
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)

STATUS
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)
To be bid in August 2012 (FY 2013)

Low Volume Road Management System

Table 1: Low Volume Roads Completed or Underway in FY 2012

LVR

4

Length (ft)
ROAD NAME
016th St - Joy Ranch Rd to Tanya Rd
1,434.00
020th St - Tamar Rd to La Salle Rd
1,282.46
La Salle Rd - 16th St to 20th St
2,615.39
Tamar Rd - 16th St to 20th St
530.71
Tanya Rd - 16th St to 16th Pl
528.86
6,391.44
Miles
1.21
Length (ft)
ROAD NAME
87th Ave: Deer Valley Rd to Williams Rd
2,640.00
Miles
0.50
Length (ft)
ROAD NAME
105th St: Jensen St to McKellips Rd
1,330.00
McKellips Rd: 103rd St to 105th St
1,320.00
2,650.00
Miles
0.50
Length (ft)
ROAD NAME
17th Ave: Maddock Rd to Joy Ranch rd
2,660.00
88th Ave: Deer Valley Rd to Williams Rd
2,690.00
5,350.00
Miles
1.01
Total Miles
11.51

LVR

5
SQ.YDS.
3,546.67
3,520.00
7,066.67

SQ.YDS.
STATUS
7,093.33
TT397-To be Bid Summer 2012 (FY 2013)
7,173.33
TT397-To be Bid Summer 2012 (FY 2013)
14,266.67

WIDTH
24
24

WIDTH
24
24

STATUS
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)

STATUS
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)

SQ.YDS.
7,040.00

WIDTH
24

STATUS
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)
Design Completed Fall 2012 (FY 2013)

SQ.YDS.
3,824.01
3,419.90
6,974.38
1,415.24
1,410.30
17,043.83

WIDTH
24
24
24
24
24

Low Volume Road Management System

Table 1: Low Volume Roads Completed or Underway in FY 2012 (continued)

MCDOT

MCDOT

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

11.2

15.3

22.7
20.0 19.4

35.5

8.9
6.2
3.9

12.2
10.4

17.8

24.1

10.5

36.1

FiscalYears

20.8

3.7

10.5

15.1

36.4
34.6

41.3

5.3

18.9

0.2 1.1

Miles of DirtRoadPavingbyMCDOTFY1983Ͳ2012

4.4
2.0
0.0

10.7

Low Volume Road Management System

Figure 1: MCDOT Dirt Road Paving History 1983-2012

LVR

6

MilesofDirtRoadsPaved

Bridge Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION

1

DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS

1

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1

REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING BRIDGES

1

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TIP PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES

2

CURRENT STATUS OF THE MCDOT BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

2

ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR BRIDGES

2

SUMMARY OF THE 2011-2012 INSPECTION SEASON (8/1/11 to 6/30/12)

2

FEDERAL FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COMPARISONS

2

Structures Eligible for Federal Replacement Funds (SR < Than 50)

2

Structures Eligible for Federal Rehabilitation Funds (Sufficiency Rating between 50 and
80)

3

POTENTIAL FEDERAL FUND PROJECTS & OVERALL MCDOT INVENTORY

3

NOTABLE 2011-2012 BRIDGE EVENTS

3

SYNOPSIS OF MCDOT’S BRIDGE PROJECTS

5

Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013-2017 TIP

5

Status of Bridge/Structure Projects Completed in FY 2011 (July 1, 2011 – June 30,
2012)

6

Status of Bridge & Structure Projects Currently Under Construction

6

Status of Bridge & Structure Projects Currently Being Designed

6

SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY FOR THE 2011–2012 BRIDGE INSPECTION SEASON

8
10-20

BRIDGE INVENTORY LIST
List of Tables
Table 1.

Structures with Sufficiency Ratings between 80 and 50

4

Table 1A. Structures with Sufficiency Ratings Lower than 50

4

Table 2.

Structure Projects in MCDOT FY 2013-2017 TIP

5

Table 3.

Structure Projects Completed in FY 2012

6

Table 4.

Status of Bridge & Structure Projects Under Construction

6

Table 5.

Projects Currently in the Design Phase by MCDOT

7

Table 6.

Summary for Activity 2011-2012 Bridge Inspection Season

7

Table 7.

Alphabetical Listing of All Structures in the MCDOT Bridge
Inventory Database.

10

MCDOT

BMS i

Bridge Management System

List of Figures
Figure 1: 2011-2012 Bridge & Structure Sufficiency Ratings

9

List of Maps
Map 1: Bridge Locations and Sufficiency Ratings

BMS

ii

21

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

INTRODUCTION
As of April 2012, Maricopa County maintains and inspects a total of 421 structures on
public roads. By the Federal Highway Administration definition, 281 of these structures
are qualified to be called “bridges” or “in-service” structures, meaning each of these
has a length greater than 20 feet. The remaining 140 are called “off-system” structures,
because their length is 20 feet or less.
DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS
“In-Service” and “Off-System” Structures
An “in-service” structure is described as one with an overall length greater than 20 feet,
therefore qualifying the structure for Federal aid, while bridge/structures 20 feet or less
in length are often called “off-system” or “non-Federal aid” bridges. However, every
structure within MCDOT’s jurisdiction is inspected in accordance with the Federal
Highway Administration’s National Bridge Inspection Standards Recording and Coding
Guide. This procedure allows MCDOT to maintain thorough, consistent records on
each bridge and structure in the County system. The decision to maintain and inspect
all of MCDOT’s structures enables MCDOT to include off-system structures when
considering how best to appropriate funds and prioritize in-house projects. Due to the
comprehensive data MCDOT maintains on all structures, MCDOT is readily able to
evaluate its inventory as a whole, rather than being restricted to information gathered
only on the in-service structures.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
In 1997 the Maricopa County Bridge Investment Study (BIS) recognized the need to
evaluate bridges separately from roadway projects. The following information identifies
MCDOT’s method of scoring and prioritizing bridge projects.
The following categories of bridge projects were chosen for evaluation and
prioritization.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Replacement Projects
Replacement of Dip Sections with New Structures
Scour Protection Projects
New Bridge Projects (not included in major road projects)

REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING BRIDGES
During 2011-2012, MCDOT did not replace any existing bridge structure. A bridge
should be considered for replacement if all four of the following conditions are met:
1. The cost of rehabilitation is 55% or more than the cost of a new bridge.
2. The bridge is functionally obsolete.
MCDOT

BMS 1

Bridge Management System

3. The sufficiency rating is less than 50.
4. The Bridge Engineer agrees replacement is justifiable.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TIP PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES
Each year, MCDOT reviews the highest rated bridge projects from the following
subcategories:
1.
2.
3.
4.

TIP Projects
Replacement of Existing Bridges
Replace Dip Sections with New Structures
New Bridge Projects (not included in major road projects)

In any given year, the budget allocation may not support inclusion of all top rated
bridge projects in the TIP Program. When this occurs, decisions are made based on
the rating criteria and professional engineering judgment.
CURRENT STATUS OF THE MCDOT BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The MCDOT Bridge Management System is up-to-date, complete, and meets or
exceeds all current Federal National Bridge Inspection Standards.
ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR BRIDGES
In 2002, MCDOT began an Asset Management program for its bridge inventory. To
date, MCDOT’s bridge and structure inventory asset valuation is estimated at
$139,462,084.
SUMMARY OF THE 2011-2012 INSPECTION SEASON (8/1/11 to 6/30/12)
In the 2011-2012 inspection season, MCDOT’s bridge inventory consisted of 281 inservice structures and 140 off-system structures. There were no new structures added
to the MCDOT inventory during this inspection season.
This year only one structure was annexed or otherwise removed from MCDOT’s bridge
inventory. A complete summary of the activity for the 2011-2012 inspection season is
included at the end of this report.
FEDERAL FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COMPARISONS
Structures Eligible for Federal Replacement Funds (SR < Than 50)
The Federal Highway Administration guidelines stipulate that when a bridge’s
sufficiency rating falls below a score of 50, the bridge becomes eligible for Federal
replacement funds. As of March 2011, Maricopa County had only one structure which
had a rating below 50: the Gillespie Dam Bridge located on Old US 80 at the Gila
BMS

2

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

River. This structure was originally constructed in 1927 and is on the National Register
of Historic Places (NRHP). It is the only steel truss bridge in the County.
Recognizing the value and importance in retaining and restoring this historical
structure, MCDOT committed to rehabilitating this valuable asset. Construction began
in the Fall of 2011 and was completed in the Spring of 2012.
The rehabilitation and restoration of the historically important Gillespie Dam Bridge
across the Gila River will help ensure that the structure remains in service for future
generations to both use and enjoy.
Upon completion of this project, the MCDOT bridge inventory had no structures with a
sufficiency rating below 50.
Structures Eligible for Federal Rehabilitation Funds (Sufficiency Rating between
50 and 80)
The Federal Highway Administration guidelines stipulate that when an in-service
structure/bridge sufficiency rating falls between a score of 50 and 80, the bridge/
structure becomes eligible for Federal rehabilitation funds. Currently, there are twentythree structures in MCDOT’s inventory that have sufficiency ratings between 50 and
80. Of these twenty-three, 23 are in-service structures that would qualify for Federal
aid for rehabilitation.
After each inspection cycle the Bridge Engineer pays specific attention to all structures
that had a significant change (ten points or more) in the sufficiency rating in order to
determine what caused the change. Remedial action is taken as necessary. Table 1
lists the in-service structures in MCDOT’s inventory that have sufficiency ratings
between 50 and 80.
POTENTIAL FEDERAL FUND PROJECTS VS. OVERALL MCDOT INVENTORY
In June 2011, the percentage of in-service structures in MCDOT’s inventory that were
eligible for Federal funds was 4%. In July 2012, the percentage of these structures in
our inventory was 5%. The vast majority of structures in Maricopa County are still in
excellent condition.
NOTABLE 2011-2012 BRIDGE EVENTS
In July 2011, the Arizona Department of Transportation released a new version of their
Bridge Design Guidelines. In an effort to provide uniform interpretation of the National
Bridge Inspection Standards as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, 23 CRF
650, Subpart C, the new ADOT guidelines clarify bridge inspection procedures as well
as documentation requirements. MCDOT bridge engineering staff has been diligently
working to implement and meet the new procedures and documentation requirements.

MCDOT

BMS 3

Bridge Management System

Table 1. Structures with Sufficiency Ratings between 80 and 50
Structure No

Structure Name

Feature Carried by Structure Deficiency Sufficiency Rating

10516

OliveAvenue

OliveAveRCB



80.00

9825

CarefreeHwyWB

CaveCreekBridge



79.92

990128

MCͲ85

DrainageDitchRCB



79.81

990276

OliveAvenue

OliveAveRCB



79.52

990143

SunValleyPkwyͲ29

WashRCB



78.99

9289

91stAve

RIDCanalRCB



78.08

8553

AlmaSchoolRd

SaltRiverBridgeNB



77.60

8554

AlmaSchoolRd

SaltRiverBridgeSB



77.60

9859

CamelbackRd

AguaFriaRiverBridge



77.51

9145

IndianSchoolRd

AguaFriaRiverBridge



76.86

990158

CamelbackRd

AguaFriaDrainRCB



76.51

9126

BellRd

DrainageDitchRCB



76.43

9375

BroadwayRdEB

TempeCanalBridgeEB

FuncƟonal

76.31

9384

BroadwayRdWB

TempeCanalBridgeWB

FuncƟonal

76.31

990164

CoƩonLane

DrainageDitchRCB



74.97

10084

CircleMtnRoad

ClineCreekRCArch



73.63

10405

AnthemWay

AnthemWayRCB



73.05

7780

GilbertRdͲFAS229

SaltRiverBridge



72.63

990169

ElMirageRd

DrainageDitchRCB



69.86

8570

RHJohnsonBlvd

DrainageDitchRCB



69.65

990172

IndianSchoolRd

BeardsleyCanalBridge



68.87

990121

QueenCreekRd

RWCDCanalRCB



65.77

990181

OldUS80

ArlingtonVWashBridge

Structural

64.79

BMS

4

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

The completion of the Gillespie Dam Bridge restoration and rehabilitation project was
the most notable accomplishment during 2011-2012. This structure is the only MCDOT
owned bridge that is listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Federal
aid was used to finance the rehabilitation cost. The completed project significantly
increased the service life-span of the structure.
SYNOPSIS OF MCDOT’S BRIDGE PROJECTS
Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013-2017 TIP
Currently, MCDOT has seven bridge and structure projects in the TIP. These projects
include bridge project scoping and new bridge designs. Refer to Table 2 for a list of the
projects.
Table 2. Bridge Projects in the MCDOT FY 2013 – 2017 TIP
STATUS

FEATURE

FACILITY/
FACILITIES

LOCATION

FY 2013
Agua Fria River
to 2017

Deer Valley Rd
Bridge

FY 2013
Salt River
to 2017

Gilbert Road Bridge At Salt River

Bridge Replacement Final
Design

FY 2012
BID Canal
to 2013

Miller Road Bridge

At BID Canal

Prepare Final Design

FY 2013
Salt River
to 2017

Dobson Road and
McKellips Road
Bridges

At Salt River

Prepare Final Design

FY 2013 Queen Creek
to 2017 Wash

Meridian Road
Bridge

At Queen Creek Wash

Prepare Final Design

FY 2013
Tiger Wash
to 2017

Eagle Eye Road
Bridge

At Tiger Wash

Initial Scoping

FY 2013
Salt River
to 2017

75th Avenue Bridge At Salt River

MCDOT

El Mirage Rd to Lake
Pleasant Rd

IMPROVEMENT

Prepare Final Design

Initial Scoping

BMS 5

Bridge Management System

Status of Bridge/Structure Projects Completed in FY 2011 (July 1, 2011 – June
30, 2012)
Five bridge/structure projects were completed in FY 2012, as listed below in Table 3.
Table 3. Structure Projects Completed in FY 2012
Status of Bridge & Structure Projects Currently Under Construction
PROJECT LOCATION

DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETED

Ellsworth Rd Improvements

Two New Box Culverts and One Culvert Widening and Extension
completed

Old US80 at the Gila River

Gillespie Dam Bridge Rehabilitation and Restoration completed

Indian School Road RCB at
the Beardsley Canal

Construction Plans finalized

Old US80 at the Gila River

Scour Plan of Action Report completed

Gilbert Road Bridge at the Salt
River

Scour Plan of Action Report completed

There are several Flood Control District structures currently under construction, including a significant bridge at Riggs Road at Sonoqui Wash, which will eventually be
owned and maintained by MCDOT. Table 4 lists the bridge projects currently under
construction by MCDOT.
Table 4. Bridge Projects Under Construction by MCDOT
PROJECT LOCATION

WORK DESCRIPTION

Indian School Road at the Beardsley Canal Existing bridge removed and new culvert constructed

Status of Bridge & Structure Projects Currently Being Designed
There are currently seven bridge projects in various stages of design by MCDOT, as
well as numerous structure projects within private developments in the design phase.
Table 5 lists the bridge projects currently under design or in the Design Concept Report
(DCR) or scoping process.

BMS

6

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Table 5. Projects Currently in the Design Phase by MCDOT
NAME

FACILITY

STATUS

Deer Valley Road Bridge

Agua Fria River

Construction Plans in progress.

Dobson Road Bridge and
McKellips Road Bridge

Salt River

Design Concept Report completed.

Gilbert Road Bridge

Salt River

Design Concept Report completed.

75th Avenue Bridge

Salt River

Initial Scoping in progress.

Miller Road Bridge Rehabilitation

BID Canal

Construction Plans in progress.

Eagle Eye Road Bridge

Tiger Wash

Initial Scoping in progress.

Meridian Road Bridge

Queen Creek Wash

Design Concept Report completed.

Table 6. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY FOR THE 2011–2012 BRIDGE INSPECTION
SEASON
Each year MCDOT must report to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
concerning the physical condition of its bridges and structures as compared to the
adopted criteria as required by the Governments Accounting Standards Board
Statement 34. The latest ratings of the County’s bridges and structures along with the
bridge sufficiency ratings (BSR) are shown below.
Summary of Structures for the 2011 - 2012 Inspection Season
CRITERIA

TARGET VALUE

ACTUAL VALUE

% of Bridges and Structures with BSR > 70

min. 90%

98.8%

% of Bridges & Structures with BSR < 50

max. 3%

0.0%

MCDOT

BMS 7

Bridge Management System

Summary of Structures for the 2011 - 2012 Inspection Season
Total number of structures in inventory: 421
Number of Federal Structures:
Number of Non-Federal Structures:
Number of bridges:
Number of culverts:

281
140
82
339

Total number of new structures added to database this year: 0
Total number of Federal structures added to database this year: 0
Total number of non-Federal structures added to database this year: 0
Total number of structure replacements made this year: 0
Total number of structures removed/annexed from database this year: 2
Dysart Road Bridge at RID canal SN 9412 (Annexed by Avondale)
Indian Springs Rd Pedestrian Crossing RCB at PIR SN 990216 (Annexed by Avondale)

BMS

8

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Figure1:2011Ͳ2012Bridge&StructureSufficiency
Ratings
s
e
r
u
tc
u
rt
S
d
n
a
se
g
d
ir
B
f
o
r
e
b
m
u
N

140
120
100

EligibleforFederal
BridgeRehabilitation
orReplacement

80
60
40
20
0

Range
94Ͳ90

MCDOT

Ra nge
89Ͳ85

Range
84Ͳ80

Range
79Ͳ75

Range
74Ͳ70

Range
69Ͳ65

Range
Less
than50

BMS 9

Bridge Management System

Table 7.

Alphabetical Listing of All Structures in the MCDOT Bridge

Structure No.

10050
10051
10553
8583
9289
10444
990151
990153
9666
9672
990154
9677
990234
9678
9679
990257
990280
10783
990265
10368
7561
990202
10552
10554
10555
10556
990203
990204
10849
10850

007thSt
007thSt
012thStreet
059thAve
091stAve
096thStreet
099thAve
099thAve
099thAve
099thAve
103thAveNB
105thAve
105thPlace
106thAve
107thAve
107thAvenue
116thStreet
117thAvenue
119thAvenue
129thAvenue
138thAve
141stAve
144thStͲRioVerde
144thStͲRioVerde
144thStͲRioVerde
144thStͲRioVerde
145thDrive
147thDrive
150thStreet
150thStreet

Location

10

0.2miN/7thSt/Carefree
450'N/CarefreeHwy
NofCircleMtnRd
0.5miS/BuckeyeRd
atMcDowellRd
1/8miN/BroadwayRoad
200'N/Grand
atConchoCircle
250'NGrandAve
0.5miN/McDowellRd
325'N/Olive
atDelWebbBlvdMedian
QuarterlineRdtoContess
atDelWebbBlvdMedian
atDelWebbBlvdMedian
0.5mi.NofWilliamsRd
600'SofRiggsRd
620'S/AguaFriaBlvd
0.5mis/WilliamsDrive
N/CamelbackRd
200'W/CaminodelSol
200'W/YosemiteDr
120'SofDixiletaDr
350'SofPeakviewRd
1250'SofDixiletaDr
atWindstoneTrail
200'W/YosemiteDr
200'N/Antelope
765'NofRioVerdeDrive
1610'NofRioVerdeDr

Feature Intersected

DesertLakeWash
DesertLkWashSBranch
Wash
RIDCanal
RIDCanal
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
RIDCanal
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
Wash
ConsolidatedCanal
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageChannel
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
Wash
Wash
HaydenRhodesCAPAqueͲ
163rdAvenue
5miN/US60_GrandAve
duct
203rdPlace

SonoquiWash
309thAvenue
SofLowerRiverRd
BuckeyeCanal
355thAvenue
7miN/IndianSchoolRd
CAPCanal
571stAve_AguaCal 9.75miN/IͲ8viaACRd
GilaRiver
571stAve_AguaCalR 8.5miN/IͲ8viaAguaCal
Wash
AirportRd
0.5miN/LowerBuckeye
RIDCanal
AirportRd
1miN/MC85
BuckeyeCanal
AleppoDrive
200'N/136thDr_W/SpnGrdn DrainageDitch
AlmaSchoolRd
300'S/McKellips
SaltRiver(N.Channel)

8571
11109
7582
8576
7548
990156
8001
10126
7549
8553
BMS

Roadway

Sufficiency
Rating

97.98
97.98
99.98
97.65
78.08
99.64
95.73
96.02
96.41
98.08
96.72
96.94
96.94
96.94
96.62
98.62
93.59
92.42
90.5
96.93
96.95
96.95
81.82
81.82
81.82
81.82
96.95
96.95
86.83
86.83
89.21
NEW
94.85
96.99
98.55
95.55
94.84
98.6
96.73
77.6
MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

8554
990117
990187
10405
990230
990228
990227
990229
990231
990232
990250
990258
990259
10551
990184
10163
990185
8000
8555
990272
9126
9686
990157
990243
990244
10512
9676
9687
990101
990102
8975
9375
9384
8855
9688
9763
9849
990113

AlmaSchoolRd
AlmaSchoolRd
AmigoDr(SCW)
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AnthemWay
AuroraDr
AvondaleBlvd
BalladDr
BaselineRd
BeardsleyRd
BelfairWay
BellRd
BellRecCenterDr
BeloatRd
BethanyHomeRd
BethanyHomeRd
BethanyHomeRd
BoswellBlvd
BoswellBlvd
BroadwayRd
BroadwayRd
BroadwayRd
BroadwayRdEB
BroadwayRdWB
BrunerRd
BurnsDrive
BushHwy
BushHwy
BushHwy

0.25miN/McLellan
0.5miS/RiggsRd
atStardustBlvdMedian
EastofIͲ17
350'W/AnthemClubDr
475'E/VentureCourt
530'E/NavigaƟonWay
200'WofAnthemClubDr
220'E/FreedomWay
.25miW/DaisyMtnDr
370'NWofLibertyBellWay
0.53miE/DaisyMtnDr
0.4miE/DaisyMtnDr
0.89miE/DaisyMtnDr
atStardustBlvdMedian
0.75miS/SouthernAve
atStardustBlvdMedian
200'NWMCͲ85
100'E/125thAve
justNofMeridianDrive
at99thAve
at99thAveMedian
E/RainbowRd
350'Eof137thAve
418'Wof135thAve
200'Eof125thAve
atDelWebbBlvdMedian
at99thAvenueMedian
atMeridianRd.
1000'E/CrismonRd
400'W/FanninMcFarCAP
0.2miE/PriceRd
0.2miE/PriceRd
0.75miN/OldUSͲ80
at99thAvenueMedian
3.2miN/McDowellRd
atBluePointͲSaltRiver
3.25miN/McDowellRd

9824

BushHwy

7779

BushHwyͲFAS388

MCDOT

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

77.6
99.63
95.06
73.05
80.67
95.53
95.9
95.9
95.9
96.44
96.44
96.51
96.51
99.51
97.84
84.63
97.84
93.68
97.36
89.38
76.43
96.63
88.93
85.53
85.53
96.81
96.76
99.81
96.21
96.21
97.33
76.31
76.31
98.98
99.57
86.21
91.77
95.63

1.7miN/Thomas

SaltRiver(S.Channel)
golfcartunderpass
DrainageDitch
Wash
PedX
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
GilaRiver
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanal
DrainageDitch
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanalS.Branch
wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
TempeCanal
TempeCanal
BuckeyeCanal
DrainageDitch
SpookHillFldwy
SaltRiver
Wash
FanninMcFarCAPAqueͲ
duct

3.5miN/McDowellRd

Wash

95.63

96.96

BMS 11

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

990158
9859
9689
10159
10160
10161
10158
9891
9892
9893
10162
9825
990269
990256
7550
7898
11111
10240
990116
990218
10084
10229
10520
990261
990236
990235
10443
990163
990162
990107
990164
10630
10629
10062
9736
8761
8856
990247
10557

CamelbackRd
CamelbackRd
CameoDr
CarefreeHighway
CarefreeHighway
CarefreeHighway
CarefreeHighway
CarefreeHwy
CarefreeHwy
CarefreeHwy
CarefreeHwyEB
CarefreeHwyWB
CarlotaLane
CastanoDrive
CavalcadeDrive
CaveCreekPKWY
CentennialRd
ChambersStreet
ChandlerHtsRd
CiceroStreet
CircleMtnRoad
CitrusRoad
ClarendonAvenue
ClearviewTrail
CloudRd
CloudRd
CloudRoad
ConquistadorDr
ConquistadorDr
CoralbellAve
CoƩonLane
CoƩonLane
CoƩonLane
CoƩonwoodRd
CourthouseRd
CrismonRd
CrismonRd
DaisyMtnDrRCB
DaisyMtnDrive

0.5miE/ElMirageRd
1.0miE/ElMirageRd
at99thAvenueMedian
0.5miW/24thStreet
0.25miE/24thStreet
0.5miE/24thStreet
W/16thStreet
at10thSt
200'W/12thSt
200'W/24thSt
1miW/CaveCreekRd
1miW/CaveCreekRd
313'Wof119thAvenue
justN.ofBethanyHomeR
200'E/141thAve
1.5miN/32ndSt/CloudRd
5.7miW/Harqua.Val.Rd
0.6miS/BroadwayRd
0.5miE/SRͲ87(AZAve)
E/105St&N/UnivDr
3437'E/NewRiverRd
justN/NorthernAve
justW/195thAve
justN/MeridianDr
1000'W/32ndDr
justE/ViaPuzzola
500'Wof32ndDrive
200'S/Beechwood
200'E/Regal
E/Ellsworth&S/Broadway
N/CamelbackRd
0.25miS/MCͲ85
1mi.S/MCͲ85
NEntranceLkPlsntPk
3miW/SalomeRd
0.25miN/BrownRd
500'N/ApacheRd
0.52miSofAnthemWay
92'EofDedicaƟonTrail

DrainageDitch
AguaFriaRiver
DrainageDitch
Wash
Wash
ApacheWash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
CaveCreekWash
CaveCreekWash
DrainageDitch
Wash
DrainageDitch
Wash
CAPAuxCanal
BuckeyeFeederDitch
ConsolidatedCanal
DrainDitch
Wash
Wash
DrainDitch
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch(Wash)
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanal
GilaRiver
CoƩonwoodCreek
SaddlebackDiversnChn
SignalBuƩeFldwy
CAPCanal
Wash
Wash

76.51
77.51
96.86
96.78
96.78
96.78
98.93
98.54
98.54
98.54
97.4
79.92
98.89
96.81
96.73
98.84
98.84
98.99
97.2
96.95
73.63
80.68
92.34
81.73
84.82
87.46
86.72
86.9
96.86
96.85
74.97
98.91
99.91
87.58
98.49
84.74
94.47
91.48
83.38

10558

DaisyMtnDrive

750'E/DedicaƟonTrail

Wash

83.38

BMS

12

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

10559
10519
10627
10628
990266
7551
8638
10044
990166
990165
990167
11071
990168
990224
7883
10787
8560
10784
10785
10786
990169
990279
8561

DaisyMtnDrive
DaisyMtnDrive
DaisyMtnDrive
DaisyMtnDrive
DaleyLane
DeanRd
DeanRd
DeerValleyDr
DeerValleyDr
DeerValleyDr
DeerValleyDr
DeerValleyDrive
DesertGlenDr
DysartRd
DysartRdͲFAS547
DysartRoad
EagleEyeRd
ElGranadaBlvd
ElGranadaBlvd
ElGranadaBlvd
ElMirageRd
ElMirageRd
ElMirageRd

0.36miNE/DedicaƟonTr
0.6miSofAnthemWay
0.4miW/GavilanPkPkwy
520'W/GavilanPkPkwy
juste/123rdAvenue
600'N/LowerBuckeyeRd
0.75miN/MCͲ85
W/135thAve
E/Veterans
W/DustrytrailBlvd(SCW)
W/AcapulcoDrive
JustN/existDeerValleyDr
100'N/132ndAve
N/CamelbackRd
0.25miN/CamelbackRd
0.25mi.S/JomaxRd
2miS/SalomeHwy
0.18mi.S/JomaxRd
0.42mi.N/HappyValleyRd
0.4mi.N/HappyValleyRd
0.25miS/Beardsley
600'S.ofLoop303
N/BellRd

Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageChannel
RIDCanal
BuckeyeCanal
GolfCartPath(SCW)
GolfCartPath
GolfCartPath
GolfCartPath
DeerValleyChannel
DrainageDitch
DrainChannel
ColterChannel
BeardsleyCanal
CAPCanal
DrainageChannel
DrainageChannel
BeardsleyCanal
DrainageDitch
PinnaclePkDrainChannel
DrainageDitch

83.38
91.48
95.67
95.67
96.89
98.66
98.8
85.28
85.63
96.37
96.67
81.61
82.86
95.38
98.38
99.92
97.9
96.93
99.96
99.96
69.86
81
83.36

11105

ElMirageRd

1.7miN.ofBellRoad

McMickenDamOutlet
Wash

94.05

11106
9949
9586
9842
11107
9138
9895
7899
10367
10366
990223
10104
8019
10397
990233
10582

ElMirageRd
ElMirageRd
ElliotRd
Ellsworth
EllsworthRd
EllsworthRd
EllsworthRd
EllsworthͲFAU7077
ForestRd
ForestRd
ForestRoad
FortMcDowellRoad
FtMcDowellRd
GavilanPeakPkwy
GavilanPeakPkwy
GavilanPeakPkwy

3.4mi.N.ofBellRoad
0.5miN/GlendaleAve
atSossaman
200'S/ApacheTrail

EmpireBlvd_PinalCoLine
0.25miN/UniversityRd
400'N/Broadway
1.4miN/McDowellMtnRd
1.3miN/McDowellMtnRd
1.3miN/McDowellMtnRd
justN/YavapaiRd
2.25miN/SR87
W/NavigaƟonWay
1600'E/NavigaƟonWay
justSofDaisyMtnDr

MCDOT

McMickenDamOutlet
Wash
DysartDrain
SossamanDitch
DrainageDitch
SonoquiWashEastBranch

SonoquiWash
CAPCanal
Wash
SmallWash
LargeWash
golfcartcrossing
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DeadmanWash

94.05
97.34
94.2
99.04
84
93.25
99.15
99.04
93.85
95.74
84.41
99.59
86.57
81.61
83.54
94.19
BMS 13

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

10855
10384
11005
11070
7554
10276
7780
990170
8562
10396
10457
10458
11006
990249
990254
990255
10518
10581
9503
9668
10085
8640
990213
990172
9145
990225
990260
10088
990175
9831
8680
990268
10274
10511
990248
990177
10052
10053
7556
11110
BMS

Roadway

GavilanPeakPkwy
GavilanPeakPkwy
GavilanPeakPkwy
GavilanPeakPkwy
GemstoneDrive
GermannRoad
GilbertRdͲFAS229
GraniteValleyDr
GreenwayRd
HappyValleyPkwy
HappyValleyPkwy
HappyValleyPkwy
HappyValleyRoad
HasƟngsWay
HasƟngsWay
HasƟngsWay
HemingwayLane
HighNoonWay
HigleyRd
HuƩonDrive
IͲ17FrontageRd
IͲ17FrontageRd
IͲ17FrontageRd
IndianSchoolRd
IndianSchoolRd
IndianSpringsRd
IronHorseWay
JackrabbitTrail
JackrabbitTrail
JackrabbitTrail
JohnsonRd
JomaxRoad
JomaxRoad
KingDrive
LaurelValleyWay
LkPleasantEntRd
LoneMountainRd
LoneMountainRd
LowerBuckeyeRd
MarshRd
14

Location

840'NofDaisyMtnDrive
300'N.KingDrive
0.5miNofPioneerRd
justN.ofJordanLane
200'W/136thDr_SCW
.25miE/SossamanRd
0.5miN/ThomasRd
200'N/AntelopeDr(SCW)
at99thAve
1.5miW/LkPleasantRd
2.06miw/LakePleasantRd
1.65miW/LakePleasantRd
0.7miEofDysartRd
250'SEofHickcockTrail
250'SWofBlazeCourt
277'NWofBlazeCourt
justEofDedicaƟonTrail
justNofKuraltDrive
0.5miS/Germann
at99thAveMedian_SCW
1000'S/NewRiverRd
0.7miS/NewRiver
S/MeanderRd
at191stAve
0.5miE/ElMirage
W/ElMirageRd
justN/MeridianDr
0.25miN/Yuma
0.25miS/SRͲ85
1000'N/SouthernAve
0.25miN/Broadway
0.25mi.WofDysartRd
.25miW/GrandAve
180'WofOpportunityWay
justNofKellerDrive
0.2miE/CastleHSprRd
0.75miE/227thAve
0.65miE/227thAve
1miW/ElMirageRd


Feature Intersected

Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
Drainagechannel
SaltRiver
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
AguaFriaRiver
Wash
Wash
TrilbyWash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
RWCDCanal
DrainageDitch
NewRiver
Wash
Wash
BeardsleyCanal
AguaFriaRiver
Wash
Wash
RIDCanal
BuckeyeCanalS.Branch
BuckeyeCanal
RIDCanal
DrainageChannel
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
AFRDiversionChannel
DrainageDitch

Sufficiency
Rating

95.96
96.37
97.27
98.66
89.29
89.84
72.63
96.41
88.41
85.78
91.32
91.32
96.55
96.78
96.78
96.78
89.34
96.89
92.31
99.68
88.32
96.62
99.58
68.87
76.86
97.72
89.38
97.12
97.76
98.33
98.88
96.47
99.94
89.4
96.89
93.87
98.96
98.96
83.14
NEW
MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

7901
990128
990214
990215
990219
990220
990127
10230
7819
7583
990262
10105
10242
8797
990179
990226
10385
10386
10388
990275
10560
10561
10108
7557
990217
10846

MC85Hwy
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85
MCͲ85Hwy
McDowellRd
McDowellRoad
McKellipsRoad
MeadowbrookAve
MeekerBlvd
MeekerBlvd
MemorialDrive
MemorialDrive
MemorialDrive
MemorialDrive
MemorialDrive
MeridianDrive
MeridianDrive
MeridianRd
MeridianRd
MeridianRd
MeridianRd(Mesa)

0.5miW/Perryville
0.25miE/CoƩonLane
0.25miE/PerryvilleRd
JustE/PerryvilleRd
335'W/EstrellaPkwy
0.3miW/EstrellaPkwy
0.5miW/Sarival
0.3miE/EstrellaPkwy
0.5miW/ElMirage
W/JackrabbitTr_195thAv
0.5miEofHawesRd_Mesa
0.5miW/SR101
W/JackrabbitTr(195Ave)
0.5miS/RHJohnsonRd
0.75miS/RHJohnson
170'EofRepublicWay
600'EofGavilanPkPkwy
1700'EofGavilanPkPkwy
350'EofRepublicWay
270'WofDaisyMtnDrive
480'S/DaisyMtnDr
0.3miS/DaisyMtnDr
0.25miN/McKellipsRd
0.5miN/BrownRd
1/8miN/University
0.5miSofWarnerRd

10847
10442
9593
10778
10241
990246
990245
10510
10086
8011
10021
7642
7643

MeridianRd(Mesa)
MeridianRoad
MillerRd
MingusRoad
MinnesotaAve
MissouriAve
MissouriAve
MissouriAve
NewRiverRd
NewRiverRd
NewRiverRd
NewRiverRd
NewRiverRd

0.5miSofWarnerRoad
0.45miN/WarnerRd
0.25miN/SRͲ85
justE/25thAvenue
W/JackrabbitTrl
justWofDysart
S/MarshallAvenear135
N/MarshallAve_135thAve
100'E/I17Frontage
0.25miE/I17
0.25miW/7thAve
at29thAve
0.25miE/27thAve

BuckeyeCanal
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanalSBranch
BuckeyeCanalSBranch
DirtIrrDitch
DirtIrrDitch
DrainageDitch
BullardWash
AguaFriaRiver
Wash
DrainageDitch
GraniteReefWash
Wash
DrainageDitch
GolfCartUnderpass
SplitFlowWash
Wash
Wash
SplitFlowWash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
BulldogFloodway
DrainageDitch
DrainageChannel
PowerLineFldwyChanͲ
nel
Wash
BuckeyeCanal
WhiteSparWash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
SkunkCreek
Wash
Wash

10106
MCDOT

NewRiverRoad

0.25miE/I17

NewRiver

Sufficiency
Rating

97.06
79.81
81.65
81.65
90.16
90.16
93.55
94.23
94.86
99.88
96.74
98.61
92.94
96.24
96.24
81.61
81.78
81.78
81.78
96.66
99.33
99.33
81.2
85.24
96.54
96.06
96.06
99.82
86.24
99.96
96.96
84.28
84.37
84.39
86.55
97.87
98.65
99.76
99.76
97.87
BMS 15

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

10083
10781
10780
8565
10507
10521
990114
8021
990181
990207
10061
990209
8025
8023
990180
990205
990206
9834
990155
11007
9999
990208
8981
11009
990276
10516
9588
10779
10517
990251
9426
7782
10580
8569
8043
8044
990264
990271
9928

NewRiverRoad
NorthernAvenue
NorthernAvenue
OldLkPlsntAccRd
OldSR87
OldSR87
OldStageRoad
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OldUS80
OliveAve
OliveAve&BNSFRR
OliveAvenue
OliveAvenue
OliveAvenue
OliveAvenue
OsbornRoad
OwensDrive
PaloVerdeRd
PaloVerdeRd
PatagoniaWay
PaƩonRd
PerryvilleRd
PerryvilleRd
PinnaclePeakRd
PlymouthDrive
PowerRd

350'N/CircleMtnRd
1miW/PerryvilleRd
1mi.W/PerryvilleRd
1miN/SRͲ74
0.8miNWofNewSR87Junc
1.0miNWofNewSR87Junc
0.6miN/NewRiverRd
S/GillespieDam
0.25miS/CactusRose
1miS/CactusRose
0.3miS/331thAve
1.5miS/CactusRose
600'N/331stAve
1miS/ArlingtonSchRd
50'S/CactusRose
0.75miS/CactusRose
7/8miS/CactusRose
1miW/JctSRͲ85
0.5miW/PaloVerdeRd
3.5miSofPaƩersonRd
500'E/SalomeHwy
1.25miS/CactusRose
0.8miE/ElMirageRd
justWofReemsRoad
800'EofPerryvilleRd
.5miW/PerryvilleRd
E/of99thAve
0.49mi.W/PerryvilleRd
justWof195thAvenue
EofCapraWay
0.25miN/Broadway
0.75miN/OldUS80Hwy
NofHonorCourt(Anthem)
1miW/GrandAve
1/3miS/VanBuren
0.5miN/Southern
70'w/121stAvenue
justEofGavilanPkPkwy
S/GuadalupeRd

ClineCreekWash
FRS#3DvrsnChnl
BeardsleyWash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
GilaRiver
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
ArlingtonValleyWash
BuckeyeDrain
BuckeyeLateral
LaytonWash
HassayampaRiver
ArlingtonValleyWash
AguaFriaRiver
ReemsRoadChannel
Wash
WashW/BeardsleyCanal
NewRiver
WaterfallWash
DrainDitch
Wash
RIDCanal
BuckeyeCanal
Wash
CAPCanal
RIDCanal
BuckeyeCanal
DrainageDitch
DrainageChannel
EastMaricopaFldwy

99.65
83.91
89.87
88.91
94.26
94.26
86.93
46.5
64.79
85.85
89.35
94.86
95.16
95.81
96.86
96.87
96.87
98.68
98.89
99.51
99.68
99.87
91.08
82.38
79.52
80
80.85
84.77
84.73
89.38
98.17
98.77
96.89
93.98
98.78
98.88
83.74
81.73
80.65

9927

PowerRd

S/GuadalupeRd

RWCDCanal(N.Crossing)

92.6

BMS

16

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

10390
990121
8681
10776
990277
990278
11008
8570
990182
11108
990270
8038
10239
9669
9670
9832
990112
8982
990186
990252
990253
990211
990222
990108
7716
8884
8573
990183
7644
7645
7646
7647

PowerRoad
QueenCreekRd
RainbowRd
RainbowRoad
RayRoad
RayRoad
ReemsRd
RHJohnsonBlvd
RHJohnsonBlvd
RiggsRd
RiggsRoad
RiƩenhouseRd
RoeserRd
RoyalOakRd
RoyalRidgeRd
SalomeRd
SignalBuƩeRd
SignalBuƩeRd
SkylarkDr
SossamanRd
SossamanRd
SouthernAve
SouthernAve
SouthernAve
SouthernAve
SouthernAve
SpanishGardenDr
StardustBlvd
SunValleyPkwy
SunValleyPkwyͲ01
SunValleyPkwyͲ02
SunValleyPkwyͲ03

0.2miS/QueenCreekRd
0.3miW/Higley
1miN/Broadway
0.5miS/SouthernAvenue
1200'EofMountainRd
900'EofMountainRd
0.5miNofNorthernAve
N/BellRd
100'E/132ndAve

160'WofRobsonBlvd
0.25miN/Cloud
0.5miS/BroadwayRd
at99thAvenueMedian
at99thAvenueMedian
8miW/HarquahalaValRd
0.5miN/BrownRd
N/BroadwayRd
atStardustBlvdMedian
980'NofMcDowellRd
0.3miNofMcDowellRd
0.5miE/MCͲ85(dirtrd)
0.5miE/CrismonRd
E/Ellsworth(Mesa)
.6miEofSignalBuƩeRd
.6miE/SignalBuƩeRd
200'E/132ndAve
165'S/YosemiteRd
300'W/McMickenDam
0.7miN/McDowellRd
0.8miN/McDowellRd
1.3miN/McDowellRd

QueenCreek
RWCDCanal(Gilbert)
RIDCanal
BuckeyeCanal
Wash
Wash
ReemsRoadChannel
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
SonoquiWash
GolfcartUnderpass
QueenCreekWash
BuckeyeFeederDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
CAPCanal
SignalBuƩeFloodway
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
Wash
DrainDitch
BuckeyeCanalSBranch
DrainageChannel
DrainageDitch
CAPDrainageChannel
CAPCanal(Mesa)
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
McMickenDamChannel
Wash
Wash
Wash

94.96
65.77
98.5
98.24
96.98
96.98
82.58
69.65
81.25
NEW
91.64
86
98.98
96.85
85.83
94.52
97.9
98.84
97.84
89.38
89.38
93.63
94.5
95.93
97.55
97.55
97.74
96.78
99.46
93.85
93.85
93.85

7648
7649
7650
7651
7652
7653
990134

SunValleyPkwyͲ04
SunValleyPkwyͲ05
SunValleyPkwyͲ06
SunValleyPkwyͲ07
SunValleyPkwyͲ08
SunValleyPkwyͲ09
SunValleyPkwyͲ10

1.5miN/McDowellRd
1.9miN/McDowellRd
2.0miN/McDowellRd
2.5miN/McDowellRd
2.6miN/McDowellRd
2.6miN/McDowellRd
2.9miN/McDowellRd

Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash

93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85

MCDOT

BMS 17

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

Roadway

Location

Feature Intersected

Sufficiency
Rating

7655
7656
990135
990136
7657
7658
7659
990137
990138
7660
7661
990139
7662
7663
990140
990141
990142
990143
990144
990145
990146
7664
7665
7666
990147
7667
7668
990148
990149
990150
7669
7670
7671
7672
7673
990189
990190
7674
7675

SunValleyPkwyͲ12
SunValleyPkwyͲ13
SunValleyPkwyͲ14
SunValleyPkwyͲ15
SunValleyPkwyͲ16
SunValleyPkwyͲ17
SunValleyPkwyͲ18
SunValleyPkwyͲ19
SunValleyPkwyͲ20
SunValleyPkwyͲ21
SunValleyPkwyͲ22
SunValleyPkwyͲ23
SunValleyPkwyͲ24
SunValleyPkwyͲ25
SunValleyPkwyͲ26
SunValleyPkwyͲ27
SunValleyPkwyͲ28
SunValleyPkwyͲ29
SunValleyPkwyͲ30
SunValleyPkwyͲ31
SunValleyPkwyͲ32
SunValleyPkwyͲ33
SunValleyPkwyͲ34
SunValleyPkwyͲ35
SunValleyPkwyͲ36
SunValleyPkwyͲ37
SunValleyPkwyͲ38
SunValleyPkwyͲ39
SunValleyPkwyͲ40
SunValleyPkwyͲ41
SunValleyPkwyͲ42
SunValleyPkwyͲ43
SunValleyPkwyͲ44
SunValleyPkwyͲ45
SunValleyPkwyͲ46
SunValleyPkwyͲ47
SunValleyPkwyͲ48
SunValleyPkwyͲ49
SunValleyPkwyͲ50

3.4miN/McDowellRd
3.6miN/McDowellRd
3.7miN/McDowellRd
4.2miN/McDowellRd
4.4miN/McDowellRd
4.5miN/McDowellRd
4.6miN/McDowellRd
4.6miN/McDowellRd
5.0miN/McDowellRd
5.1miN/McDowellRd
5.3miN/McDowellRd
5.6miN/McDowellRd
6.1miN/McDowellRd
6.1miN/McDowellRd
6.4miN/McDowellRd
6.6miN/McDowellRd
6.7miN/McDowellRd
6.8miN/McDowellRd
7.0miN/McDowellRd
7.2miN/McDowellRd
7.3miN/McDowellRd
7.3miN/McDowellRd
7.4miN/McDowellRd.
7.4miN/McDowellRd
7.6miN/McDowellRd
8.0miN/McDowellRd
8.1miN/McDowellRd
8.5miN/McDowellRd
8.6miN/McDowellRd
8.9miN/McDowellRd
9.2miN/McDowellRd
9.2miN/McDowellRd
10.0miN/McDowellRd
10.2miN/McDowellRd
10.2miN/McDowellRd
10.5miN/McDowellRd
10.8miN/McDowellRd
11.1miN/McDowellRd
11.2miN/McDowellRd

Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash

93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
93.85
90.85
93.85
93.85
89.79
90.85
90.85
78.99
90.85
90.85
90.85
93.85
93.85
92.85
90.85
92.85
93.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
93.85
93.85
81.99
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85

7676

SunValleyPkwyͲ51

11.8miN/McDowellRd

Wash

90.85

BMS

18

MCDOT

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

7677
7678
7679
7680
7681
7682
990191
7683
7684
7685
990192
990193
7687
7688
990194
7689
7690
7691
990195
7692
990196
7693
7694
7695
990197
7696
7697
7698
7699
7700
7701
7702
7703
990198
7704
7705
990110
9683
990200
8629
MCDOT

Roadway

SunValleyPkwyͲ52
SunValleyPkwyͲ53
SunValleyPkwyͲ54
SunValleyPkwyͲ55
SunValleyPkwyͲ56
SunValleyPkwyͲ57
SunValleyPkwyͲ58
SunValleyPkwyͲ59
SunValleyPkwyͲ60
SunValleyPkwyͲ61
SunValleyPkwyͲ63
SunValleyPkwyͲ64
SunValleyPkwyͲ65
SunValleyPkwyͲ66
SunValleyPkwyͲ67
SunValleyPkwyͲ68
SunValleyPkwyͲ69
SunValleyPkwyͲ70
SunValleyPkwyͲ71
SunValleyPkwyͲ72
SunValleyPkwyͲ73
SunValleyPkwyͲ74
SunValleyPkwyͲ75
SunValleyPkwyͲ76
SunValleyPkwyͲ77
SunValleyPkwyͲ78
SunValleyPkwyͲ79
SunValleyPkwyͲ80
SunValleyPkwyͲ81
SunValleyPkwyͲ82
SunValleyPkwyͲ83
SunValleyPkwyͲ84
SunValleyPkwyͲ85
SunValleyPkwyͲ86
SunValleyPkwyͲ87
SunValleyPkwyͲ88
SunlandAve
ThunderbirdRd
TrailRidgeDr
TurnerRd

Location

11.8miN/McDowellRd
11.9miN/McDowellRd
11.9miN/McDowellRd
11.9miN/McDowellRd
11.9miN/McDowellRd
12.0miN/McDowellRd
13.1miN/McDowellRd
13.9miN/McDowellRd
14.1miN/McDowellRd
14.3miN/McDowellRd
17.7miN/McDowellRd
18.1miN/McDowellRd
18.3miN/McDowellRd
18.4miN/McDowellRd
18.5miN/McDowellRd
18.9miN/McDowellRd
18.9miN/McDowellRd
19.1miN/McDowellRd
19.1miN/McDowellRd
19.3miN/McDowellRd
19.5miN/McDowellRd
19.6miN/McDowellRd
19.7miN/McDowellRd
19.7miNMcDowellRd
19.8miN/McDowellRd
20.4miN/McDowellRd
21.4miN/McDowellRd
21.6miN/McDowellRd
22.1miN/McDowellRd
22.5miN/McDowellRd
22.6miN/McDowellRd
22.9miN/McDowellRd
23.4miN/McDowellRd
23.6miN/McDowellRd
24.1miN/McDowellRd
24.2miN/McDowellRd
E/Ellsworth
at99thAveMedian
200'W/YosemiteDr
0.5miS/BaselineRd

Feature Intersected

Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanal

Sufficiency
Rating

90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
90.85
96.89
87.58
96.83
99.94
BMS 19

Bridge Management System

Structure No.

8584
990152
9374
8862
8882
8881
7706
990273
8983
990274
10369
10514
10515
10513
8577
10782
990263
8578
9919
990267

BMS

Roadway

TuthillRd
UnionHillsDr
UniversityDr
UniversityDrive
VanBurenSt
VanBurenSt
VanBurenSt
VentureDrive
ViaHermosa
WhiteTanksMntBlvd
WhitmanDrive
WigwamCreekBlvd
WigwamCreekBlvd
WigwamCreekBlvd
WildwoodDrive
WilliamsDrive
WilliamsDrive
Wilson(283rd)Ave
WoodsRd
YearlingRoad

20

Location

0.5miS/BeloatRd
at99thAve
900'W/Dobson
0.5miE/EllsworthRd
1miW/339thAve
0.5miW/CitrusRd
E/SVPͲPaloVerdeRd
0.46mi.SWofAnthemWay
W/ForestRd(RioVerde)
460'Wof183rdAve
600'E/GalvinPeakPkwy
550'NWofOrangeDrive
justNofCamelbackRd
200'SWof124thLane
200'W/125thAve
0.3mi.E/ElMirageRd
at123rdAvenue
1miS/Baseline
E/OldUSͲ80
0.2mi.e/LitchÞeldRd

Feature Intersected

GilaRiver
DrainageDitch
TempeCanal
CAPCanal
DickeyWash
RIDCanal
DrainageDitch
Wash
Wash
DrainageChannel
Wash
DrainDitch
DrainDitch
DrainChannel
DrainageDitch
McMickenOuƞallWash
DrainageDitch
BuckeyeCanal
GilaBendCanal
DrainageChannel

Sufficiency
Rating

96.28
95.65
95.43
98.41
91.13
98.55
99.88
84.25
99.7
96.85
99.86
81.45
81.45
96.55
97.96
83.63
89.34
98.72
98.51
85.62

MCDOT

YUMA
COUNTY

Eagle Eye Rd.

Lahman Rd.

Ag
ua

Ca
lie
nt
e

Rd
.

531st Ave.

Baseline Rd.

Lower Buckeye Rd.

Courthouse Rd.

Camelback Rd.

499th Ave.

LA
PAZ
COUNTY

0

2.5

5

10 Miles

W
as
h

355th Ave.

Vult
ure
Min
eR
d.

Wintersburg Rd.

477th Ave.

<50 Bridge Replacement Funds

Ton
o

307th Ave.

411th Ave.

eH
wy.

235th Ave.

Patton Rd.

d.
op a R
Mar ic

BUCKEYE

pah
- Sa
lom

GILA
BEND

331st Ave.

Sun Valley Pkwy.

River

pa

ya
m
Ha
ssa

Johnson Rd.

Cloud Rd.

Rooks Rd.

50-80 Bridge Rehabilitation Funds

Watson Rd.

>80 All Other Bridges

G ila River

211th Ave.
Airport Rd.

ua

AVO NDAL E

Hunt Hwy.

Ocotillo Rd.

Carefree Hwy.

Sku
nk
C

Av
e.

re

v
Ca

sh

Pecos Rd.

PHO ENIX

Estrella Dr. P H O E N I X

Baseline Rd.

Cloud Rd.

Salt Riv er

Lower Buckeye Rd.

McDowell Rd.

G
ra
nd

Northern Ave.

Cactus Rd.

Bell Rd.

Deer Valley Rd.

TOLLESON

GOO DYEA R

LITCHFIELD
PARK

Rd
.

Camelback Rd.

YO UNGT OW N
GLENDAL E EL
MIRAGE

SURPRI SE

PEO RIA

YAVAPAI
COUNTY

Ri
ve r

Ne
w

WICK ENB URG

Perryville Rd.
187th Ave.

Produced by Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division
May 2012

571st Ave.

Litchfield Rd.

43rd Ave.

Bridge Locations - Sufficiency Ratings

555th Ave.

Wilson Ave.

Old US 80

163rd Ave.
Sarival Ave.

91st Ave.

91st Ave.

lW
ko
Ve

PARA DISE
VAL LEY

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

PINAL
COUNTY

CHANDLER

se

QUEEN
CREEK
GILBERT

rd

Rd
.

MESA

Ve

Ri
tte
nh
ou

FOUN TAIN
HILLS

Hunt Hwy.

Camelback Rd.

Via De Ventura

Cactus Rd.

Bell Rd.

SCO TT SDALE

Jomax Rd.

Lone Mountain Rd.

CAREFREE

CAVE
CREEK
40th St.

Ri
ve
r
Ne
w
67th Ave.
67th Ave.

ek

Central Ave.

115th Ave.

Avondale Blvd.

Scottsdale Rd.

ek

e

19th Ave.
19th Ave.
h

as

In dian Bend Wa
sh

Cre

7th Ave.

d.
Tatum Blvd.

kR
Ca
ve
Cr
ee
40th St.
40th St.

7th St.

64th St.
Kyrene Rd.

16th St.
16th St.

Pima Rd.
Price Rd.

iver

e

2012 Bridge Ratings

Gilbert Rd.

zW
ru

Greenfield Rd.

aC

Power Rd.

it
bb
ra
ck

Ellsworth Rd.

Ja
Gi l a R iv e

nt

Baseline Rd.

University Dr.

McDowell Blvd.

Map 1

G ila R
iv e
r

BMS 21

Empire Blvd.

Q ueen Creek

Ocotillo Rd.

Pecos Rd.

Warner Rd.

APAC HE
JUNCTION

Meridian Rd.

R

Ag
Fria River

Sa
a

r

Waterman Wash

Roadway Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION

1

ROADWAY/PAVEMENT EVALUATION RATINGS

1

Pavement Condition Ratings

1

International Roughness Index

1

Sufficiency Ratings

2

TRUCK TRAFFIC ON ARTERIALS

4

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE

5

PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE RESULTS

6

PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PLAN

6

SUMMARY

10

List of Tables
Table 1: Preventive Maintenance Treatment Longevity

6

Table 2: FY 2010 Pavement Preservation 5 Year Summary Report

7

Table 3: Miles of MCDOT Paved Roads FY 1996-2010

9

Table 4: FY 2010 Completed Maintenance Plans

12

Table 5: FY 2011 Pavement Preservation Plan

13

Table 6: FY 2010 Annual Network Rating Summary

14

List of Figures
Figure 1: FY 2005-2010 Pavement Condition Ratings

2

Figure 2: FY 2005-2010 International Roughness Index

3

Figure 3. FY 2005-2010 Sufficiency Ratings

3

Figure 4: Average Percent of Trucks on Arterials & Collectors

4

Figure 5: Yearly Percent of Trucks on Arterials & Collectors 2006-2010

5

Figure 6: FY 2010 Completed Maintenance Mileage

8

Figure 7: FY 2010 Maintenance Costs

8

Figure 8: Miles of Paved Roads 1996-2010

9

Figure 9: FY 2011 Pavement Preservation Plan

11

Figure 10: FY 2011 Estimated Maintenance Cost

11

List of Maps
Map 1: Pavement Condition Ratings FY 2011

15

Map 2: International Roughness Index FY 2011

16

Map 3: Sufficiency Ratings FY 2011

17

Map 4: Maintenance Activities NW Area

18

Map 5: Maintenance Activities NE Area

19

Map 6: Maintenance Activities SE Area

20

Map 7: Maintenance Activities SW Area

21

MCDOT

RMS i

Roadway Management System

Introduction
Pavement maintenance is broadly identified as work accomplished to preserve or
extend the pavement’s life until major rehabilitation or complete reconstruction is
performed. Maintenance is classified by function as either routine or preventive.
Preventive maintenance preserves rather than improves the capacity or strength of
the pavement structure. In order for preventive maintenance to be effective it should
be applied to structurally sound pavement before the pavement displays significant if
environmental distress such as raveling, oxidation and block cracking. Timely
treatments prove to be the most cost effective. While routine maintenance more
typically consists of, pothole repair, patching, sweeping and/or striping.
All roads deteriorate over time due to environmental conditions and the volume and
type of traffic using the roadway. The roadways within the jurisdiction of the Maricopa
County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) are maintained at a high level of
service by the following County program:
x Continuously monitor and evaluate roadway conditions, roadway evaluation
ratings are stored in the Road Management System (RMS) database
x Report roadway conditions to decision makers via annual reports
x Modeling pavement conditions and maintenance strategies
x Develop annual and long term maintenance plans and implement the plans as
funding permits
Roadway and Pavement Evaluation Ratings
Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR)
The Road Management Section evaluates pavement conditions for surface distress
every 12-18 months for arterial and collector roads and every other year for local
roads. Half of the local roads are evaluated each year. The ratings range from 0 to
100 with 100 being new pavement or pavement with no distress. The result allows
for quantifying the overall pavement condition of the road network. See the Pavement
Preservation Program (PPP) document for further details.
International Roughness Index (IRI)
MCDOT uses a Laser Road Profiler (LRP) equipped with triple (3) lasers, one in each
wheel track and one in the mid-lane to collect IRI data. Annually the MCDOT Road
Management Section collects the IRI for each arterial road segment with a length
greater than a quarter of a mile. The IRI values are determined for each road
segment on a scale from 1 to 500 with 500 representing an extremely rough road.
IRI values are categorized by performance subgroups and the percentage of each
group can be seen in Figure 2; IRI Ratings.
MCDOT utilizes the PCR and IRI ratings to forecast preventive maintenance
programs and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) planning. The consistent
RMS

1

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

Figure 1: FY 2005-2010 Pavement Condition Ratings

FY 2005-2010 Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR)%
100%

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

90%

80%
70%
60%
60%

55%

58%

57%

54%
51%

50%

o
f

40%

30%

S
y
s
t
e
m

20%
10%

24%

24%

23%

21%

24%

23%

22%

20%

17%

19%

18%

16%

4%

4%

4%

3%

1%

1%

0%

FY 2005

FY 2006

FY2007

FY2008

FY2009

FY2010

Fiscal Year
Excellent (100-85)

Very Good (84-71)

Good (70-55)

Fair (54-40)

Poor (<40)

results of implementing preventive maintenance on MCDOT roads is evident in the
above chart Figure 1: PCR Ratings, which shows the PCR quality by percentage
ranking of all arterial roads in the County. The PCR data is also presented in Table 4
on page 12 of this report.
Sufficiency Ratings
The Road Management Section collects most of the details for each arterial road
segment. The rating identifies how well each road segment compares to the MCDOT
Roadway Design Manual (RDM) standards. Ratings for each category are combined
per road segment and scored on a scale from 0 to 100, 100 representing a road in
compliance with the RDM standards.
The sufficiency ratings of arterial roads are updated only after major improvements or
reconstruction of the road. New construction, widening, or significant improvement to
the safety issues such as, bottleneck, drainage, vertical and horizontal sight distance
are required to impact the rating. Sufficiency Rating of the network is provided in
Figure 3.

MCDOT

RMS 2

Roadway Management System

Figure 2: FY 2005-2010 International Roughness Index
FY 2005-2010 International Roughness Index (IRI)
100%
90%
P
e
r
c
e
n
t

80%
70%

S
y
s
t
e
m

60%
50%

44%

19%

20%

22%

10%

4%

17%

15%

11%

1%

18%

14%

38%

36%
29%

29%

28%

30%

o
f

38%

36%

40%

26%

18%

16%
1%

1%

38%
27%

18%

16%
1%

18%

17%
1%

0%
FY 2005

FY 2006

FY
2007Year
Fiscal

FY 2008

Very Smooth (0-59)

Smooth (60-94)

Rough (170-220)

Very Rough (>220)

FY 2009

FY 2010

Average (95-1 69)

Figure 3. FY 2005-2010 Sufficiency Ratings

FY 2005-2010 Sufficiency Ratings
100%

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

90%
80%
70%
60%
53%

51%

53%

52%

53%

53%

50%

o
f

40%

35%

34%

34%

34%

34%

33%

30%

S
y
s
t
e
m

20%
10%
0%

13%

12%

1%
0%

FY 2005

12%

1%
0%

FY 2006

2%
0%

FY 2007

12%

12%

1%
0%

FY 2008

13%

1%
0%

FY2009

1%
0%

FY2010

Fiscal Year
Excellent (100-85)

RMS

3

Very Good (84-71)

Good (70-55)

Fair (54-40)

Poor (<40)

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

TRUCK TRAFFIC ON ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS
Vehicle classification counts are conducted annually by MCDOT. The latest truck count
data is shown in Figure 4. Truck traffic has declined 49% on MCDOT’s arterial and collector roads since 2006. This is one indicator of the slow economy in the County. Individual yearly declines in the percent of truck traffic are shown in figure 5. The only positive aspect of this decline is that MCDOT’s roadways will experience slower deterioration until the economy improves.
Figure 4: Average Percent of Trucks on Arterials & Collectors

AveragePercentTruckson
Arterials&Collectors2006Ͳ2010
P
e
r
c
e
n
t

8.42%
9%

7.33%

8%

5.53%

7%
6%

4.43%

5%
T
r
u
c
k
s

4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2006

2007

2009

2010

Years

MCDOT

RMS 4

Roadway Management System

Figure 5: Yearly Percent of Trucks on Arterials & Collectors 2006-2010

Number&PercentTruckTraffic
OnArterials&Collectors2006Ͳ2010

%
T
r
u
c
k

80
70
60
50

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

40
30
20
10
0
0-5%

6-10%

11-15%

15-40%

Percent Truck Traffic
2006
2007
Preventive Maintenance Performance
Preventive maintenance extends the life of the pavement and provides for better performance. The majority of treatments for flexible pavement involves sealing the existing
surface and providing a new wearing surface for traffic.
MCDOT has used preventive maintenance practices for decades with excellent results.
Table 1 shows the break down of each treatment that is typically used, the frequency
of application and the observed increase in pavement life per application.
We can see how the maintenance of the road network could fall behind with only one
tenth ($10 million) of the needed amount ($95 million) funded each year.

RMS

5

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

Table 1: Preventive Maintenance Treatment Longevity
Treatment

Pavement age at time
of first application (yr.)

Frequency of
application (yr.)

Observed increase in
pavement life (yr.)

Fog Seal/ Rejuvenate

3 to 4

3 to 4

3 to 4

Crack Filling/Sealing

8 to 10

4 to 5

4 to 5

Single Chip Seal

10 to 12

5 to 6

5 to 6

Double Chip Seal

10 to 12

5 to 6

5 to 6

Micro Surfacing

10 to 12

5 to 6

5 to 6

Slurry Seal

10 to 12

5 to 6

5 to 6

Arterial—Thin Overlay—
1.5”- 2” ARHM
Local—Mill & Resurface
1.5” ARHM
* TBD—To be determined

12 to 15

12 to 15

12+

35+

TBD*

TBD*

Preventive Maintenance Results
MCDOT currently has jurisdiction of 1,112 miles (2,613 lane miles.) of arterial roads,
884 miles (1856 lane miles) of local roads and 52 miles (104 lane miles) of park roads.
That adds up to a total of 2,048 centerline miles and 4,573 lane miles. In Fiscal Year
2010 MCDOT maintained 1,257 lane miles of road which is equal to 27.5% of the total
lane miles.
The cost to complete the 2010 maintenance plans was $22,327,505. MCDOT also
spent $13,563,980 in 2009.
These efforts resulted in network average PCR value of 82.6 for arterial roads versus
81.70 for 2009. Local roads improved the average PCR value of 91.9, versus 90.3 for
2009. Park roads rated 89.40 for 2010, park roads are a new breakout in 2010.

Pavement Preservation Plan
Pavement preservation plans are generated by application of the preservation strategy
flow charts to the current pavement ratings in the database. Implementation of our
projected maintenance plans for FY 2011 will cost $27.0 million to apply all the
recommended surface treatments and existing pavement rehabilitation. While the total
network maintenance needs for the next five fiscal years (FY 2011 - 2015) are
estimated at $70 million. The FY 2011 pavement preservation plans and estimated
costs are provided in Figures 6 and 7.
The MCDOT maintenance funds will be enhanced in FY 2011 by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for $6.47 million and $2.5 million additional

MCDOT

RMS 6

Roadway Management System

Table 2: FY 2010 Pavement Preservation 5 Year Summary Report

FY 2010 - Pavement Preservation 5 Year
Summary Report
7/15/2010

FY 2009 - FY 2013
5 Yr. Projection 2008

FY 2009 - FY 2010
Completed

Preservation Type

Ln Miles

Cost

Ln Miles

Cost

%

Reconstruction
Arterial AR Overlay
Local M&R
Chip Seal HV
Chip Seal LV
Slurry
Micro Seal
Preservative Seal
Crack Seal

15.83
129.51
263.00
234.88
187.70
264.74
0.00
565.00
383.66

$3,412,500
$12,189,230
$25,058,275
$3,742,328
$2,990,576
$5,659,845
$0
$2,923,374
$1,985,130

1.85
92.69
314.96
165.77
152.87
37.97
29.61
385.36
711.38

$465,000
$7,700,356
$15,923,455
$2,929,188
$2,166,356
$695,445
$863,409
$2,198,335
$3,414,938

14%
63%
64%
78%
72%
12%

Pavement Preservation Totals: 2,044.32 $57,961,258

1,892.46

$36,356,482

75%
172%

63%

FY 2011 - FY 2015
5 Yr. Projection Preservation Type

Ln Miles

Cost

Reconstruction
Arterial AR Overlay
Local M&R
Chip Seal HV
Chip Seal LV
Slurry Seal
Micro Seal
Preservative Seal
Crack Seal

12.18
229.89
259.37
626.06
160.84
307.43
0.00
717.91
824.38

$2,570,000
$27,531,558
$11,817,465
$11,931,122
$3,224,500
$5,681,016
$0
$4,663,373
$5,028,982

Pavement Preservation Totals: 3,138.06 $72,448,016

RMS

7

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

Figure 6: FY 2010 Completed Maintenance Mileage
FY 2010 Completed Maintenance Mileage
600

580

550
500
L
a
n
e

450

M
i
l
e
s

300

400
350

246

250

176

200
150

108

100

56.5

38

30

22

Slurry Seal

Micro Seal

AR Overlay

50
0
Crack Seal

Mill and Preservative
Resurface Seal
SC & SCW

RBST HV

RBST LV

Surface Treatment s

Figure 7: FY 2010 Maintenance Costs
FY 2010 Maintenance Costs
$12,000,000
$11,000,000
$10,000,000
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
C
o
s
t

$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0

Surface Treatments

MCDOT

RMS 8

Roadway Management System

Table 3: Miles of MCDOT Paved Roads FY 1996-2010
Miles of MCDOT Paved Roads FY 1996-2010
Classification 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010

Diff

1,998 1,305 1,281 1,284 1,276 1,262 1,254 1,236 1,246 1,258 1,258 1,227 1,179 -819
Local
Minor Collec123 652 639 630 635 621 616 602 411 406 404 391 390 267
tor
Major Collec583 669 654 645 648 630 622 601 318 314 315 287 282 -301
tor
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial

86

88

87

39

108

106

85

85

78

73

69

484 473

472

389

376

290

105 104

105

105

109

150 150

150

125

126

87

2,829 2,822 2,769 2,750 2,749 2,696 2,670 2,618 2,608 2,601 2,600 2,419 2,353 -476
TOTAL
Note: As a result of changed land usages and road upgrades, a shift from collector roads to arterial roads
occurred.
In 1997 and 2005 MCDOT roads were reclassified accordingly as seen in the above table.
Figure 8: Miles of Paved Roads 1996-2010

MilesofPavedRoads1996Ͳ2010

M
i
l
2,000
e
s 1,750
1,500

Classified
Local

*

*

1,250

Minor
Collector

1,000
750

Major
Collector

500
250

Minor
Arterial

0
1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009
2010
* Asaresultofchanginglandusesandroad
upgrades,ashiftfromcollectorroads toarterial

RMS

9

Principal
Arterial

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

funds to be used in a 1.5” asphalt rubber overlay program. Furthermore, MCDOT is
going to fund $5.30 million for a mill and resurface plan for Sun City West MRS 1.
There will be $2.20 million of arterial AR overlays, $2.25 million for crack sealing, $2.5
million for chip seal, $1.20 million for preservative seal, and $0.88 million for slurry
seal. There will be 13 programs in all executed this year. See Table 4: FY 2010
Completed Maintenance Plans.

Summary
Fiscal Year 2010 has been a very successful year MCDOT’s pavement preservation
group and the Operations Division. We have completed 16 of 17 programs this year
with an expenditure of $22,327,505 and only the 2010 ARRA AR Overlay being
delayed due to federal requirements and is still in progress.
All the effort this year has resulted in an improvement in the network average PCR
value of 82.6 for arterial roads and PCR value of 91.9 for local roads. The results of
the FY2010 pavement preservation program show the network is improving. In 2009
the Avg PCR was 85.56. It increased to 86.80 in 2010, a 1.5% improvement. If
additional funding becomes available we will consider accelerating our preventative
maintenance plans for more crack seal, slurry seal, chip seal and mill and overlay
projects to improve the quality of MCDOT roads.
In 2008, it was projected that the pavement preservation and preventative
maintenance needs for the five- year period of FY 2009 to 2013 would be $57.9 million
to keep the County roadway system at the then existing serviceability level. In the past
two fiscal years, FY2009 and 2010, MCDOT has completed pavement preservation
and preventative maintenance projects for a total amount of $36.4 million, or 63
percent of the projection. Furthermore, due to the dynamic nature of the roadway
system, in FY 2010 the projected needs for pavement preservation and preventative
maintenance were identified to be $72.5 million for the next cycle of five fiscal years,
FY2011 to 2015. See Table 2: Pavement Preservation 5 Year Summary Report for
details.

MCDOT

RMS 10

Roadway Management System

Figure 9: FY 2011 Pavement Preservation Plan
FY 2011 Pavement Preservation Plan

L
a
n
e
M
i
l
e
s

400
350
300

391

250
200
150

205
142

128
84

100
50
0

48

45

30

28

2

Surface Treatments

Figure 10: FY 2011 Estimated Maintenance Cost
FY 2011 Estimated Maintenance Costs
$10,000,000
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
C
o
s
t

$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0

Surface Treatments

RMS

11

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

Table 4: FY 2010 Completed Maintenance Plans

MCDOT Pavement Management Program
Road Management System

FY 2010 Completed Maintenance - RMS
Project Name

WO#

Cost/SY

SY

Ln Miles

Total Cost

2010 - AR Overlay

30050068 $ 13.00

184,100

22.42

$2,393,300.00

2010 - Chip Seal HV

30050069 $

1.94

459,050

55.89

$890,557.00

2010 - Chip Seal LV

30050069 $

1.94

463,991

56.49

$900,142.52

2010 - Slurry Seal

30050070 $

2.23

311,859

37.97

$695,445.57

2010 - Preservative Seal - Local - TRMSS

30050071 $

0.94

1,009,514

122.92

$948,943.16

2010 - Crack Seal - All

30050072 $

0.52

993,097

120.92

$516,410.44

2010 - Micro Seal

30050080 $

3.55

243,214

29.61

$863,409.70

2010 - Crack Seal - All

30050081 $

0.46

1,113,921

135.63

$512,403.66

2010 - Crack Seal - All

30050082 $

0.50

1,267,200

154.29

$633,600.00

2010 - Chip Seal HV

30050083 $

2.33

428,871

52.22

$999,270.29

2010 - Preservative Seal - Local - TRMSS

30050084 $

0.65

360,740

43.92

$234,481.00

2010 - Crack Seal - All

30050093 $

0.51

32,690

3.98

$16,671.90

2010 - Preservative Seal - Local - TRMSS

30068006 $

0.18

75,100

9.14

$13,518.00

2010 - Sun City - MRS 3

TT174

$

5.74

662,719

80.69

$3,804,007.06

2010 - Sun City - MRS 4

TT175

$

5.79

1,357,522

165.29

$7,860,052.38

2010 - Crack Seal - All

TT175

$

0.77

1,357,522

165.29

$1,045,291.94

Project Maintenance Totals: 1,256.68

MCDOT

$22,327,504.62

TIP Funding:

$12,709,351.38

Operations Funding:

$9,618,153.24

RMS 12

Roadway Management System

Table 5: FY 2011 Pavement Preservation Plan

FY 2011 - Pavement Preservation Plan
Status Update 06.30.2010
Project Name

WO #

Cost/SY

SY

Ln Miles

300500XX
30050087
TT--TT322 & 326
TT343
TT--TT--30050086
30050086
30050088
30050088
30050092
30050091
30050091
30050089
30050090

$26.00
$9.80
$8.50
$7.75
$7.75
$0.00
$0.00
$2.00
$2.00
$2.00
$2.00
$2.25
$0.75
$0.75
$0.65
$0.65

20,000
224,772
370,000
1,167,647
686,594
721,818
523,281
681,000
158,500
370,811
82,500
390,500
401,656
1,282,575
1,933,000
1,276,665

2.44
27.37
45.05
142.17
83.60
87.89
63.71
82.92
19.30
45.15
10.05
47.55
48.90
156.16
235.36
155.44

Needs
Cost

ARRA
Budget

Fiscal Year 2011
Reconstruct 2 Ln
Arterial - AR Overlay
Arterial - AR Overlay - Bush Hwy & Usery Pass
AR Overlay - ARRA Funds
Mill & Resurface - Sun City West - MRS 1
Mill & Resurface - Sun City West - MRS 2
Mill & Resurface - Sun City West - MRS 3
RBST - High Volume - Plan 1 Fall - Low Bid
RBST - Low Volume - Plan 1 SE Fall - Low Bid
RBST - High Volume - Plan 4 - Spring JOC
RBST - Low Volume - Plan 4 - Spring JOC
Slurry Seal - Plan 1
Preservative Seal - Arterial Preservative Seal - Local - Plan 1
Crack Seal - Plan 1 - Article 5
Crack Seal - Plan 2 - JOC
Pavement Preservation Totals:

Project Name

10,291,319
TIP Funding:
Ops Funding:
Additional Funding Required:

$520,000
$2,202,766
$3,145,000
$9,049,264
$5,321,104
$0
$0
$1,362,000
$317,000
$741,622
$165,000
$878,625
$301,242
$961,931
$1,256,450
$829,832

$3,145,000
$9,049,264

1,253.05 $27,051,836 $12,194,264
$5,321,104
$9,536,468
$12,194,264

WO #

Cost/SY

SY

Ln Miles

300500XX
TT--TT--TT--300500XX
300500XX
300500XX
300500XX
300500XX
300500XX
TT286

$25.00
$8.00
$9.00
$9.00
$2.25
$2.25
$2.25
$0.75
$0.75
$0.70
$2.50

20,000
200,000
721,818
523,281
1,840,000
330,000
420,000
600,000
1,200,000
561,000
1,114,396

2.44
24.35
87.89
63.71
224.04
40.18
51.14
73.05
146.11
68.31
135.69

Needs
Cost

Fiscal Year 2012
Reconstruct 2 Ln ***
Arterial Thin AR Overlay
Mill & Resurface - Sun City West - MRS 2
Mill & Resurface - Sun City West - MRS 3
RBST - HV - FY11-2 608k & FY11-3 1.23m
RBST - LV - FY11-2 290k & FY11-3 40k
Slurry Seal - FY 11-2
Preservative Seal - Arterial FY11
Preservative Seal - Local FY11-2
Crack Seal - Plan
Micro Seal - Sun Valley Parkway
Pavement Preservation Totals:

RMS

13

7,530,495
TIP Funding:
Ops Funding:
Additional Funding Required:

$500,000
$1,600,000
$6,496,362
$4,709,529
$4,140,000
$742,500
$945,000
$450,000
$900,000
$392,700
$2,785,990

916.90 $23,662,081
$15,591,881
$8,070,200

MCDOT

Roadway Management System

Table 6: FY 2010 Annual Network Rating Summary

MCDOT Pavement Management Program
Road Management System

FY 2010 Annual—Network Rating Summary
Arterial
Average PCR
Average IRI
Mileage

2006
80.55
162.02
1213.37

2007
80.52
165.17
1132.23

2008
82.04
163.50
1100.18

2009
81.73
163.80
1102.45

2010
82.61
163.09
1112.54

PCR 100-85
PCR 84-70
PCR < 55
Miles above 70

623.30
284.67
49.22
907.97

602.88
221.15
43.56
824.03

655.57
177.67
28.50
833.24

646.28
200.90
18.76
847.18

636.02
260.19
6.77
896.21

% above 70
% below 55

74.8%
4.1%

72.8%
3.8%

75.7%
2.6%

77.0%
2.0%

81.0%
1.0%

Average PCR
Mileage

2006
88.51
840.86

2007
89.54
808.33

2008
89.18
806.64

2009
90.32
885.31

2010
91.93
884.09

PCR 100-85
PCR 84-70
PCR < 55
Miles above 70

525.42
254.94
3.95
780.36

587.38
181.21
1.55
768.59

597.49
173.76
1.30
771.25

721.16
136.03
1.30
857.19

724.48
119.62
5.10
844.10

% above 70
% below 55

92.8%
0.5%

95.1%
0.2%

95.6%
0.2%

96.8%
0.1%

98.5%
0.6%

Local

Park
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Average PCR
Mileage

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

89.39
52.11

PCR 100-85
PCR 84-70
PCR < 55
Miles above 70

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

44.97
5.46
1.30
50.43

% above 70
% below 55

0.0%
0.0%

0.0%
0.0%

0.0%
0.0%

0.0%
0.0%

97.0%
3.0%

Network Avg PCR

83.81

84.28

85.06

85.56

86.80

82.19%
2.59%

82.07%
2.32%

84.14%
1.56%

85.74%
1.01%

87.41%
0.64%

Network Totals
Network % above 70
Network % below 55

Note: FY data is typically selected from June 30th or the last work day of the fiscal year.

MCDOT

RMS 14

D
OL

UA
AG

D

AG
UA

RR
DE

GL
EA

CA
L

IEN
T

ER
D

N

RD

HARQUAHALA VALLEY RD

47
7

RD

TH

411TH AVE

POWERLINE RD

U TH
SO

WINTERSBURG RD

ERN

355TH AVE

PAC

T
IFIC

R

ELLIOT RD

VAN BUREN ST

$
a
"
!
TON

D
NTE
PAI

ROCK

GILA
BEND

WATERMELON RD

Y

PIERPOINT RD

S AL
OM
E HW

BUCKEYE

}
I

SISSON RD

OPA
H

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

CLOUD RD

E RD

$̀
"
!

D
ER

395TH AVE

NARRAMORE RD

INDIAN SCHO
OL RD

SION RD

DOBBINS RD

COURTHOUSE RD

NCH

E EXTEN
AG UA CA LIENT

BASELINE RD

SOUTHERN AVE

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

BUCKEYE RD

HW
Y

PE
AK

SA
LO
ME

EH
OR

AG
UIL O
A RACH
RD
OR
A

491ST AVE

WICKENBURG

TIO
LLA

80

HY

HIGHLINE RD

LAHMAN RD

TL

CENTENNIAL RD

LIT

539TH AVE

RD

URE
MIN
E
VULT

RD
YE
EE

RD

483RD AVE

v
I

339TH AVE

D

GATES RD

NR

OGDEN RD

Í
?

HAZEN RD

PATTON RD

RD
CH

BELOAT RD

YUMA RD

OLIVE AVE

CACTUS RD

GREENWAY RD

SURPRISE

ÿ
A

RD

Â
?

D EER VA LLE Y

v
I

DOVE VALLEY RD

211TH AVE

219TH AVE

GOODYEAR
ESTRELLA DR

W

DESERT HILLS DR

ANTH
EM

ó
A

CAVE
CREEK

BE

LTL

IN
ER

D

À

PECOS RD
BIA 32

TEMPE

BO
M

YD

RD
DOBSON

Ì
?

T

ð
A

CASA
BL

RD

ES

H

BARTLETT DA
M

EW
UR
IS
LE

ì
A

Ð
?

RD

T DR

BIA 51

LD
OR

VD
BL

e
A

WY
HH
BUS

EMPIRE BLVD

QUEEN
CREEK

GERM ANN RD

Ì
?

BROWN RD

MCKELLIPS RD

EAGLE CRES

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD

GILBERT

Ð
?

ANCA

SESAME RD

j
A

Ð
?

RS

RIO VERDE DR

HO

FOUNTAIN
HILLS

144T H S T

SHEA BLVD

v
I

ð
A
MESA

16

RI
GH

BIA

W

CHANDLER

Þ
A

Þ
A

BELL RD
FR
AN
K
LL
O

BL
VD

LT

D
TR
OU
OK
LO

F H 62
7

BASELINE AVE

LOST DUTCHMAN BLVD

OCOTILLO RD

RD

Ð
?

ü
A

ARIZONA FARMS RD

BELLA VISTA RD

Y

VALLEY RD

D
DAM R

$̀
"
!

NELSON RD

HU

SCOTTSDALE

PIMA RD

QUEEN CREEK RD

RIGGS RD

$
a
"
!

GUADALUPE

á
A

Y
PKW
ILLS
RD
OTH
RAY
RT FO
DESE
CHA NDLER BLVD

CAREFREE

MCDOWELL RD

LINCOLN DR
MCDONALD DR

PARADISE
VALLEY

PINNACLE PEAK RD

AVE
ERN

¸
?

TH
NOR

PHOENIX

TELEGRAPH PASS RD

$
c
"
!

I 17 FRONT

HAPPY VALLEY RD

DOBBINS RD

BASELINE RD

TOLLESON

RD

CAREFREE HWY

GLENDALE

Þ
A
AVONDALE

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

LITCHFIELD
PARK

PATTERSON RD

DR

EL MIRAGE
YOUNGTOWN

DEER VALLEY

JOMAX RD

PEORIA

SA RD
LE ME
TAB

87TH AVE
PKW
Y

TE
NS

PALO VERDE RD

EL MIRAGE RD
OLD EL MIRAGE RD

NE
W

¿
?

331 ST AVE

136TH ST

CO

AIRPORT RD

107TH AVE

DEL WEBB BLVD

SE VEN SPRIN GS RD
128TH ST

RD

M

DA

OE

PHOTO VIEW RD VALLEY RD

EN

IS
TERPR

IENTE RD
CAL

HARQUAHALA HYDER
RD

JACKRABBIT TR

SD
R
AB
LE
LG
CO
RA
19TH AVE

D
KR

REE
CAV
EC

SR
AN

DO
UG
LA
US
OLD

555TH AVE

OW
INB
RA

571ST AVE

JOHNSON RD

SCOTTSDALE RD

RIV
ER

SR

HW

OAT
MAN

E
AV

N
OH

SA
DD
L

NCH RD
EFF US RA
TUTHILL RD

HAYDEN R
D

KE
LA
RD NOR
TH

SOUTH
LAKE

RD
SS RD

}
I

99TH AVE

TATUM BLVD

RD
NEEDLEROCK

D
MOUNTAI
NR

EASA
NT
LAKE
PL

VEKOL VALLEY RD

D
RELLA PKW
Y
EST

RD
MOUNTAIN

TJ

POTATOE RD

N
COTTON L

IN
SA

BULLARD AVE

ALMA SCHOOL RD

G WY
STAN

GR
UR

MU

NB
KE
MCDOWELL

IC
W
USERY PA

WHITE TANK

EL LSWORTH RD

163RD AVE

MERIDIAN RD

D
BLV

VINEYARD RD

E
RD
Y
Y PKW
MOUNTA IN RD

UR
LT
K
CIA

CLINE
CABIN

VU
A
PE
TAN
VIS

88

D

H VALLE
RD
MAN
SOSSA

SCHNEPF RD

SPUR CROSS RD

SR

LE
ST
SR
NORT
PEAK PKWY

RD

QUAIL RUN LN

CA
G
IN
PR
TS
HO

Y
THOMPSON
LL
CDOWE
FORT M

NT
HU

ATTAWAY RD

KE RD
O LA
UAR
SAG

D

August 2011

RMS 15

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 2.5 5 7.5 10 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

PAVEMENT CONDITION
RATING (PCR)

Map 1

UA
AG

AG
UA

D
RR
DE
HY

CA
L

IEN
TE
RD

BASELINE RD

RD

491ST AVE

47
7

R AN
CH

RD

TH

DOBBINS RD

COURTHOUSE RD

OR A
CHO

411TH AVE

T
IFIC

R

ELLIOT RD

AC
NP

WINTERSBURG RD

R
THE

POWERLINE RD

SOU

355TH AVE

VAN BUREN ST

$
a
"
!

TON
O PA
H SA

CITRUS VALLEY RD

CK DA
D RO
NTE
PAI

GILA
BEND

SISSON RD
WATERMELON RD

PIERPOINT RD

Y

BUCKEYE

}
I

LOM
E HW

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

CLOUD RD

E RD

$̀
"
!

D
ER

395TH AVE

NARRAMORE RD

INDIAN SCHO
OL RD

EXTENSION RD
AG UA CALIENTE

SOUTHERN AVE

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

A

483RD AVE

TIO
LLA
TE
NS

D

GATES RD

NR

Í
?

HAZEN RD

PATTON RD

BELOAT RD

YUMA RD

ÿ
A

RD

OLIVE AVE

CACTUS RD

GREENWAY RD

SURPRISE

DEER VALLE Y

v
I

DOVE VALLEY RD

Â
?

GOODYEAR

EY DR

PATTERSON RD

MESA RD

ESTRELLA DR

DOBBINS RD

BASELINE RD

TOLLESON

W

DESERT HILLS DR

ANTH
EM

¸
?

H
NORT

ó
A

T FO

IL
OTH

BE
LTL
IN

ER

D

À

PARADISE
VALLEY

CAREFREE

TEMPE

RD

Ì
?

ð
A

RD

H

BARTLETT D
AM
R

IS
LE

ì
A

Ð
?

D

BIA 51

EW
UR

VD
BL

e
A

HH
BUS

EMPIRE BLVD

QUEEN
CREEK

GERM ANN RD

Ì
?

BROWN RD

LD
OR

USERY PA
SS RD

MCKELLIPS RD

ST DR
EAGLE CRE

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD

GILBERT

Ð
?

CASA
BLAN
CA

SESAME RD

j
A

Ð
?

ES

FOUNTAIN
HILLS

144TH ST

SHEA BLVD

v
I

ð
A
MESA

16

HT

RS

RIO VERDE DR

HO

WY

BASELINE AVE

LOST DUTCHMAN BLVD

OCOTILLO RD

RD

Ð
?

ü
A

ARIZONA FARMS RD

BELLA VISTA RD

Y

VALLEY RD

M RD

$̀
"
!

NELSON RD

BIA

RIG

CHANDLER

Þ
A

Þ
A

W
BL
VD

LT
BO
M

SCOTTSDALE

HU

BELL RD
FR
AN
K
LL
OY
D

QUEEN CREEK RD

RIGGS RD

$
a
"
!

GUADALUPE

á
A

MCDOWELL RD

LINCOLN DR
MCDONALD DR

RD
RAY
CHANDLER BLVD

WY
LS PK

PECOS RD
BIA
32

DESER

CAVE
CREEK

PINNACLE PEAK RD

AVE
ERN

PHOENIX

TELEGRAPH PASS RD

$
c
"
!

I 17 FRONT

HAPPY VALLEY RD

CAREFREE HWY

GLENDALE

Þ
A
AVONDALE

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

LITCHFIELD
PARK

EL MIRAGE
YOUNGTOWN

DEER VALL

JOMAX RD

PEORIA

LE
TAB

D
TR
OU
OK
LO

136TH ST

CO

80

D
OL

HIGHLINE RD

LAHMAN RD

HW
Y

EA
KR
D

BUCKEYE RD

ME

NP

D
ER
EY

HO
R

SA
LO

TL
E

CENTENNIAL RD

LIT

E
GL
EA

AG
UIL

D

MIN
ER
VULT
URE

OGDEN RD

RD

WICKENBURG

IS
RPR
ENTE

IENTE RD
CAL

HARQUAHALA HYDER
RD

HARQUAHALA VALLEY RD

v
I

339TH AVE

211TH AVE

219TH AVE

87TH AVE
NT PK
WY
LAKE
PLEA
SA

RD
ER

¿
?

331ST AVE

EL MIRAGE RD
OLD EL MIRAGE RD

SE VEN SPRING S RD
128TH ST

RD

M

DA

OE

PHOTO VIEW RD VALLEY RD

539TH AVE

SCOTTSDALE RD

RD

SOUTH
LAKE

7
FH 62

}
I

JOHNSON RD

107TH AVE

DEL WEBB BLVD

RD

REE
K
EC
CAV

AN
CH
DO
UG
LA
SR
US
OLD

555TH AVE

OW
INB
RA

HW

571ST AVE

PALO VERDE RD

G WY

RIV

R
NS

N RD

AIRPORT RD

HAYDEN R
D

NE
W

OH
TJ

SA
DD
L

JACKRABBIT TR

TATUM BLVD

RD
NEEDLEROCK

MCDOWELL
MOUNTAI
N RD

PIMA RD

DOBSON

NT
HU

OAT
MA

E
AV
TUTHILL RD

CH RD
EFFUS RAN

IN
SA

POTATOE RD

N
COTTON L

RELLA PKW
Y
EST

RD

M
SO SSA

BULLARD AVE

RD
99TH AVE

DR
LE
S
GA
B
AL
CO
R
19TH AVE

RG
BU
ALMA SCHOOL RD

N
KE
STAN

IC
MU

W
MOUNTAIN

VEKOL VALLEY RD

WHITE TANK

ELLSWORTH RD

SPUR CROSS RD

MERIDIAN RD

163RD AVE
LL R D

VINEYARD RD

RE
RD
WY
Y
MOUNTA IN RD

U
LT
K
D
BLV
CIA
TAN D
VIS BLV
GY
ILO
TR
PEAK PKW

CDOWE

SCHNEPF RD

VU
A
PE
CLINE
CABIN

RD
EY PK
H VALL

88

LE
ST
GS
RIN
NORT
FORT M

KE RD
QUAIL RUN LN

CA

P
TS
HO

Y
THOMPSON

A
RO L

SR

UA
SAG

AN RD

D

Map 2

August 2011

RMS 16

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 2.5 5 7.5 10 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Very Rough

Rough

Average

Smooth

Very Smooth

INTERNATIONAL
ROUGHNESS
INDEX (IRI)

UA
AG

AG
UA

D
RR
DE
HY

CA
L

IEN
TE
RD

BASELINE RD

RD

491ST AVE

47
7

R AN
CH

RD

TH

DOBBINS RD

COURTHOUSE RD

OR A
CHO

WINTERSBURG RD

411TH AVE

POWERLINE RD

RN
THE
SOU

355TH AVE

IF
PAC

IC T

R

ELLIOT RD

VAN BUREN ST

$
a
"
!

TON
O PA
H SA

CITRUS VALLEY RD

CK DA
D RO
NTE
PAI

GILA
BEND

SISSON RD
WATERMELON RD

PIERPOINT RD

Y

BUCKEYE

}
I

LOM
E HW

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

CLOUD RD

E RD

$̀
"
!

D
ER

395TH AVE

NARRAMORE RD

INDIAN SCHO
OL RD

EXTENSION RD
AG UA CALIENTE

SOUTHERN AVE

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

A

483RD AVE

TIO
LLA
TE
NS

D

GATES RD

NR

Í
?

HAZEN RD

PATTON RD

BELOAT RD

YUMA RD

ÿ
A

RD

OLIVE AVE

CACTUS RD

GREENWAY RD

SURPRISE

DEER VALLE Y

v
I

DOVE VALLEY RD

Â
?

GOODYEAR

EY DR

PATTERSON RD

MESA RD

ESTRELLA DR

DOBBINS RD

BASELINE RD

TOLLESON

W

DESERT HILLS DR

ANTH
EM

ó
A

T FO

IL
OTH

BE
LTL
IN

ER

D

CAREFREE

RD

Ì
?

ð
A

RD

H

BARTLETT D
AM
R

IS
LE

ì
A

Ð
?

D

BIA 51

EW
UR

VD
BL

e
A

HH
BUS

EMPIRE BLVD

QUEEN
CREEK

GERM ANN RD

Ì
?

BROWN RD

LD
OR

USERY PA
SS RD

MCKELLIPS RD

ST DR
EAGLE CRE

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD

GILBERT

Ð
?

CASA
BLAN
CA

SESAME RD

j
A

Ð
?

ES

FOUNTAIN
HILLS

144TH ST

SHEA BLVD

v
I

ð
A
MESA

16

HT

RS

RIO VERDE DR

HO

WY

BASELINE AVE

LOST DUTCHMAN BLVD

OCOTILLO RD

RD

Ð
?

ü
A

ARIZONA FARMS RD

BELLA VISTA RD

Y

VALLEY RD

M RD

$̀
"
!

NELSON RD

BIA

RIG

CHANDLER

Þ
A

Þ
A

W
BL
VD

LT
BO
M

SCOTTSDALE

HU

BELL RD
FR
AN
K
LL
OY
D

QUEEN CREEK RD

RIGGS RD

$
a
"
!

GUADALUPE

TEMPE

MCDOWELL RD

á
A

RD
RAY
CHANDLER BLVD

À

PARADISE
VALLEY

LINCOLN DR
MCDONALD DR

VE
NA

WY
LS PK

PECOS RD
BIA
32

DESER

CAVE
CREEK

PINNACLE PEAK RD

¸
?

HER
NORT

PHOENIX

TELEGRAPH PASS RD

$
c
"
!

I 17 FRONT

HAPPY VALLEY RD

CAREFREE HWY

GLENDALE

Þ
A
AVONDALE

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

LITCHFIELD
PARK

EL MIRAGE
YOUNGTOWN

DEER VALL

JOMAX RD

PEORIA

LE
TAB

D
TR
OU
OK
LO

136TH ST

CO

80

D
OL

HIGHLINE RD

LAHMAN RD

HW
Y

EA
KR
D

BUCKEYE RD

ME

NP

D
ER
EY

HO
R

SA
LO

TL
E

CENTENNIAL RD

LIT

E
GL
EA

AG
UIL

D

MIN
ER
VULT
URE

OGDEN RD

RD

WICKENBURG

IS
RPR
ENTE

IENTE RD
CAL

HARQUAHALA HYDER
RD

HARQUAHALA VALLEY RD

v
I

339TH AVE

211TH AVE

219TH AVE

87TH AVE
NT PK
WY
LAKE
PLEA
SA

RD
ER

¿
?

331ST AVE

EL MIRAGE RD
OLD EL MIRAGE RD

SE VEN SPRING S RD
128TH ST

RD

M

DA

OE

PHOTO VIEW RD VALLEY RD

539TH AVE

SCOTTSDALE RD

RD

SOUTH
LAKE

7
FH 62

}
I

JOHNSON RD

107TH AVE

DEL WEBB BLVD

RD

REE
K
EC
CAV

AN
CH
DO
UG
LA
SR
US
OLD

555TH AVE

OW
INB
RA

HW

571ST AVE

PALO VERDE RD

G WY

RIV

R
NS

N RD

AIRPORT RD

HAYDEN R
D

NE
W

OH
TJ

SA
DD
L

JACKRABBIT TR

TATUM BLVD

RD
NEEDLEROCK

MCDOWELL
MOUNTAI
N RD

PIMA RD

DOBSON

NT
HU

OAT
MA

E
AV
TUTHILL RD

CH RD
EFFUS RAN

IN
SA

POTATOE RD

N
COTTON L

RELLA PKW
Y
EST

RD

M
SO SSA

BULLARD AVE

RD
99TH AVE

DR
LE
S
GA
B
AL
CO
R
19TH AVE

RG
BU
ALMA SCHOOL RD

N
KE
STAN

IC
MU

W
MOUNTAIN

VEKOL VALLEY RD

WHITE TANK

ELLSWORTH RD

SPUR CROSS RD

MERIDIAN RD

163RD AVE
LL R D

VINEYARD RD

RE
RD
WY
Y
MOUNTA IN RD

U
LT
K
D
BLV
CIA
TAN D
VIS BLV
GY
ILO
TR
PEAK PKW

CDOWE

SCHNEPF RD

VU
A
PE
CLINE
CABIN

RD
EY PK
H VALL

88

LE
ST
GS
RIN
NORT
FORT M

KE RD
QUAIL RUN LN

CA

P
TS
HO

Y
THOMPSON

A
RO L

SR

UA
SAG

AN RD

D

August 2011

RMS 17

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 2.5 5 7.5 10 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

SUFFICIENCY
RATING

Map 3

TL
E

RD

RAN
C
HR
D

COURTHOUSE RD

ORA
CHO

INDIAN SCHOOL RD

$
a
"
!

EN
ICK
W

ME
HW
Y

PE
AK

RD

CLOUD RD

TON
O

PAH
SA

LOM
E HW

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

Y

}
I

GATES RD

PATTON RD

YR

D

BUCKEYE

OLIVE AVE

CACTUS RD

GREENWAY RD

SURPRISE

DEE R VALLE

v
I

DOVE VALLEY RD

Â
?

EL MIRAGE

Y DR

GOODYEAR AVONDALE

LITCHFIELD
PARK

PHOENIX

YOUNGTOWN

DEER VALL
E

JOMAX RD

PEORIA

CAMELBACK RD

GLENDALE

ÿ
A

163RD AVE

SA
LO

HO
RN

D

491ST AVE

WICKENBURG

D
NR

D
BLV

CENTENNIAL RD

LIT

R
YE
EE
GL
EA

AG
UI
LA

483RD AVE

VALLEY RD

v
I

339TH AVE

PHOTO VIEW RD

¿
?

RD
I NE
VULT
URE
M

WINTERSBURG RD

D

NC
HR

RA

HARQUAHALA VALLEY RD

TIO
LLA
TE
NS
CO

D

RD
OU
GL
AS

K
EA
EP
UR
LT
U
V
OGDEN RD

}
I

GY
ILO
TR
LITCHFIELD RD

RD
EL MIRAGE RD
OLD EL MIRAGE RD

CA
GS
IN
PR
TS
O
H
LE
ST

N RD
K MOUNTAI
WHITE TAN

RD
RG
BU

NCH RD
EFFUS RA

219TH AVE

211TH AVE

355TH AVE
395TH AVE

411TH AVE

Map 4

August 2011

RMS 18

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 1.252.53.75 5 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Dust Palliative

Chip Seals

Asphaltic Rubber

Seal Coats

Overlay

Crack Fill

MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES FY 2011
(N.W. AREA)

OLD CAREFREE HWY

107TH AVE

DEL WEBB BLVD

GLENDALE

Þ
A

PEORIA

D

RIV
ER
R

NE
W

I 17 FRONT

HAPPY VALLEY RD

CAREFREE HWY

GAVILAN PEAK PKWY

$
c
"
!

E
N AV

¸
?

R
THE
NOR

LINCOLN DR

PINNACLE PEAK RD

PHOENIX

MCDONALD DR

PARADISE
VALLEY

CAVE
CREEK

SPUR CROSS RD

GLENDALE AVE

YOUNGTOWN

EL
MIRAGE

SURPRISE

TH A E
V

87

PKW
Y

LAKE
PLEA
SAN
T

T HILLS DR
DESER

C

ES
DR
GA
BL

OR
AL

RD
REE
K

CA
VE
C

W

RD

CAREFREE

Þ
A

FR
A
NK
LL
OY
D

BELL RD

SCOTTSDALE

TE BLVD
DYNAMI

STAGECOACH PASS

PIMA RD

AN
TH
EM

TATUM BLVD

W
RI
GH
T

BL
VD

128TH ST

T
OU
OK
LO
LT
O
B
M
HU

RD

SH E

HO
RS
ES
H

EA
GL
E

Ð
?

D
BLV

GO
LD
EN

FOUNTAIN
HILLS

144TH ST

A B LV D

BARTLETT DAM R
D

RD

BL
VD

RIO VERDE DR

M
DA
OE

RD

D

MCDOWELL MO
UNTAIN RD

R
SA
ME

HAYDEN

DE
S

ER
TM
O
UN
TA
IN
PK
WY
ALMA SCHOOL RD

WY
VALLEY PK

PALISADES

Y

LVD

BLVD
NCIA
VISTA
PEAK PKW
THOMPSON

FOU
NTA
IN H
ILLS
B

RD
RINGS

H
NORT

NEEDLEROCK

HOT SP

MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PARK DR
MESA

LAKE RD
SOUTH

CASTLE

Y
MUSTANG W
Y

BIA 5
1

I
SPR

RD
NO
RT
HL
AK
E

EN
SE V
SAGUARO B

PASS
RD

USER
Y

E
BL
TA

BUSH

HWY
S R 88

KE RD
O LA
UAR
SAG

FORT MCDOWELL RD

LVD

D
SR
NG

CLINE CABIN RD

FH 627

136TH ST

SCOTTSDALE RD

Map 5

August 2011

RMS 19

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 1.25 2.5 3.75 5 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Dust Palliative

Chip Seals

Asphaltic Rubber

Seal Coats

Overlay

Crack Fill

MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES FY 2011
(N.E. AREA)

T

Y

KW

PATTERSON RD

AVONDALE

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

GOODYEAR

GLENDALE

GOODYEAR

ESTRELLA DR

ELLIOT RD

DOBBINS RD

BASELINE RD

TOLLESON

Þ
A

ó
A

N
SA

19TH AVE

ER
D

BIA 3
2

BE
LTL
IN

PECOS RD

RD
RAY
CHANDLER BLVD

PHOENIX

À

TELEGRAPH PASS RD
D
NR
JUA

TEMPE

$̀
"
!

RIGGS RD

Ì
?

QUEEN CREEK RD

NELSON RD

$
a
"
!

GUADALUPE

á
A

Þ
A

SCOTTSDALE

MCDOWELL RD

PARADISE
VALLEY

j
A

Ð
?

CHANDLER

v
I

CASA
BLAN
CA R
D

SESAME RD

ð
A

ð
A

Ð
?

ì
A

Ð
?

GILBERT

MESA

BROWN RD

e
A

MOUNTAIN RD

EMPIRE BLVD

HO
US
E
CLOUD RD RD

RIT
TE
N

GERMANN RD
QUEEN
CREEK

PINAL
UNINCORPORATED

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD

DR

MCKELLIPS RD

ST
EAGLE CRE

USER
Y PA
SS R
D

ELLSWORTH RD

INDIAN SCHOOL RD

OCOTILLO RD

APACHE
JUNCTION

LOST DUTCHMAN BLVD

BASELINE AVE

VINEYARD RD

AP

LL

RE

ES

BULLARD AVE

51ST AVE

NS
OH

BELLA VISTA RD

SCHNEPF RD

TJ
IN
SA

Ð
?

Y
W

VEKOL VALLEY RD

ü
A

QUAIL RUN LN

LITCHFIELD
PARK

ATTAWAY RD

RD
AN
CH

LN

ARIZONA FARMS RD

KI N
GS
R

N
COTTO
D OB S O N

CLEMANS RD

D
SOSSAMAN R

H
NT
HU

RD

RD

MERIDIAN RD

99TH AVE

Æ
?

Map 6

August 2011

RMS 20

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 1.5 3 4.5 6 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Dust Palliative

Chip Seals

Asphaltic Rubber

Seal Coats

Overlay

Crack Fill

MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES FY 2011
(S.E. AREA)

HARQUAHALA HYDE
R RD

R
DE

AG
UA

RD

CA

LIE
N

TE
R

D

BASELINE RD

483RD AVE

$̀
"
!

IENTE EXTENSION RD
AGUA CAL

DOBBINS RD

411TH AVE

WINTERSBURG RD

RN
THE
SOU

ELLIOT RD

395TH AVE

POWERLINE RD

NARRAMORE RD

IF
PAC

R
IC T

VAN BUREN ST

331ST AVE

339TH AVE

WATERMELON RD

SALO
ME
HW

Y

RD

OCK
TED R
PAIN

GILA
BEND

ON
SISS RD

PIERPOINT RD

80

HY

491ST AVE

SOUTHERN AVE 47

SALOME H
WY

PAH

RISE
ERP
ENT

HIGHLINE RD

LAHMAN RD

HARQUAHALA VALLEY RD

LOWER BUCKEYE RD

BUCKEYE RD

COURTHOUSE RD

$
a
"
!

TON
O

JOHNSON RD

INDIAN SCHOOL RD

PALO VERDE RD

US
OLD

571ST AVE

555TH AVE

CENTENNIAL RD

539TH AVE

OAT
MAN
RD

D

ER

Í
?

HAZEN RD

BUCKEYE

BELOAT RD

JACKRABBIT TR

RA

QUEEN CREEK RD

TUTHILL RD

AIRPORT RD

RIGGS RD

YUMA RD

T
ES

GLENDALE

PATTERSON RD

CHANDLER HEIGHTS RD

LEY RD
VAL

SA
DD
L

Y
KW

AP
LL

E
AV
W
BO
IN

POTATOE RD

LN

PHOENIX

GOODYEAR

AVONDALE

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

GOODYEAR

LITCHFIELD
PARK

BULLARD AVE

H
7T

RE

N
COTTO

RD
DAM

CITRUS VALLEY RD

355TH AVE

Map 7

August 2011

RMS 21

Produced by the Maricopa County
Public Works GIS Division

0 1.5 3 4.5 6 Miles

Maricopa County

Arterial Roads

U.S., State, or
County Highways

Interstate Highways

Dust Palliative

Chip Seals

Asphaltic Rubber

Seal Coats

Overlay

Crack Fill

MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES FY 2011
(S.W. AREA)

Asset Management System

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION

1

BACKGROUND

1

REAL ESTATE

2

TRAFFIC SIGNALS

3

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

5

List of Tables
Table 1: FY 2011 Transportation Improvement Program

4

List of Figures
Figure 1: FY 2011 Land Assets Acquired by MCDOT

2

Figure 2: FY 2011 Land Asset Reductions

3

Figure 3: FY2011 Transportation Improvement Program Disposition

5

Figure 4: FY 2011 Maricopa County Assets Added by Percentage

5

MCDOT

AMS

i

Asset Management System

INTRODUCTION
It is the policy of Maricopa County and the Department of Transportation to maintain
effective internal controls to manage its Infrastructure Assets, and to maintain proper
records regarding the use and disposition of those assets.
There is a necessity for Maricopa County Department of Transportation to safeguard
and maintain Assets in order to receive the maximum benefit and to comply with State
and Federal requirements regarding the use and disposition, and to properly account
for its Infrastructure Assets for financial statement purposes.
An effort is taking place to provide transparency in how Maricopa County Department
of Transportation provides services within the organization and to the County’s
constituents. As a result, Divisions are understanding and appreciating their roles in
relation to developing and maintaining Infrastructure Inventory.
Since the
implementation of GASB 34, there has not been a comprehensive account of what is
captured at the Division level. It is the intent of the Planning Division and Asset
Management Team to educate, inform, develop and streamline Asset Management
reporting.
Background
Government entities were encouraged to adopt GASB (Governmental Accounting
Standards Board) Statement 34, titled Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments, model to be in compliance
with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) by June 15, 2001.
GASB is responsible for establishing GAAP for both state and local governments.
GAAP sets the criteria that government must follow in order to obtain a “clean opinion”
from auditors. A clean opinion means you have good credit and is very important when
a state or local government wants to issue bonds, obtain financing for long-term
construction projects, and obtain performance bonds.
GASB approved GASB 34 in June 1999, and it was the first time government entities
were required to report the value of their infrastructure assets and develop methods
and procedures for asset management systems. The goal of GASB 34 is to have
financial statements reflect the financial health of government entities.
Governments that do not comply with GAAP may pay more to issue debt because the
bonding agency will not be able to determine the financial health of the government
entity. In addition, it would be increasingly difficult to obtain loans for capital projects
when needed because of poor bond ratings.
Maricopa County has received three consecutive “adverse opinions” as a direct result
AMS

1

MCDOT

Asset Management System

of how MCDOT and Flood Control are recording infrastructure, lack of internal controls
and assessing value for non-TIP related assets.
Real Estate
The Real Estate Division is responsible for Property Management, Acquisitions, and
Property Engineering. The Real Estate Division plays an important role by providing
the detailed account of land rights dispositions associated with MCDOT projects. All
land rights activity is validated by resolutions, deeds, or Board of Supervisors approval
and referenced within Real Estate database.
While much of this divisions activity is associated with acquisitions of right-of-way for
Transportation TIP projects and Flood Control CIP, the Real Estate Division also
processes municipal annexations, road declarations, road abandonment, and excess
land sales. The Real Estate Division also maintains the records and documentation of
those activities. The Board of Supervisors authorizes Transportation and Flood Control
projects by adoption of resolutions authorizing the departments to spend money to
acquire right of way, construct and maintain projects thus adding projects to the
respective Asset Management Inventory
Figure 1: FY 2011 Land Assets Acquired by MCDOT

MCDOT

AMS 2

Asset Management System

Figure 2: FY 2011 Land Asset Reductions

In FY11 Maricopa County added $42.7 Million in land assets to the County
infrastructure inventory. The predominate means of adding to County Assets has been
the acceptance of subdivision right-of-way and roadways. The acceptance of
subdivisions into the System resulted in 95% of the additional land added to the
MCDOT inventory. Annexations by County municipalities is the primary means of land
asset reduction to MCDOT’s Inventory.
Traffic Signals
Signals are either part of a TIP project or acquired via O&D of a development. When
part of a TIP project, a signal light is added into MCDOT inventory on the date it is
switched on. A designated MCDOT employee then provides a letter of completion.
AMS

3

MCDOT

Asset Management System

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
The Transportation Improvement Program is a collaborative effort of Planning, Project
Management and Finance. Within the program projects are identified, budgets and
timelines are created for major construction projects lead by MCDOT. Projects are
added to the TIP based on evaluations of scope, schedule, and budget and presented
to the Transportation Advisory Board for recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.
Projects can include transportation studies, improvements to structures, signals, Low
Volume Road paving and reconstruction of roadways. Not all of the projects result in
an addition to the MCDOT infrastructure inventory. Some are expensed while others
can be a part of an IGA where MCDOT recoups funds expended and a municipality
assumes jurisdiction over the completed project. The future ownership/jurisdiction is
typically identified through intergovernmental agreements (IGA).
Once a project is complete, MCDOT staff prepares correspondence to the contractor
and MCDOT internal customers that the project is complete and accepted into
Maricopa County Department of Transportation inventory. There is a one-year warranty
period. It is a timetable during which contractors are obligated to make any repairs as
required by MCDOT.
Table 1: FY 2011 Transportation Improvement Program
Completed
Infrastructure

Preservation

Non Capital Expenses

Construction In Progress

16 Projects

18 Projects

69 Projects

37 Projects

$38,287,931 Spent

$22,984,684 Spent

$16,261,316 Spent

$33,953,443 Spent

MCDOT

AMS 4

Asset Management System

Figure 3: FY2011 Transportation Improvement Program Disposition

Figure 4: FY 2011 Maricopa County Assets Added by Percentage

AMS

5

MCDOT