NAVAJO COUNTY ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2011-12 2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD FY 2011-12 The Government Finance Officers Association of the United State and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Navajo County, Arizona, for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010. In order to receive this award a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. This is the second consecutive year that the Navajo County Finance Department has received this award. 4 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET RESOLUTION FY 2011-12 5 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADOPTED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2011 - 2012 FY 2011-12 J.R. DeSpain Jerry Brownlow District 3 District 5 Jesse Thompson David Tenney Jonathan M. Nez District 2 District 4 District 1 James G. Jayne County Manager E.L. ―Dusty‖ Parsons Assistant County Manager BUDGET TEAM James Menlove, Finance Director Mary Springer, Deputy Finance Director Cris Parisot, Senior Accountant Bill Chaddick, Accountant Aaron Adams, Financial Analyst 6 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y NAVAJO COUTNY DISTRICT MAP FY 2011-12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Prefix County Attorney 98 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award 3 County Constables 103 Budget Resolution 4 Facilities Management 106 County Supervisors 5 Information Technology 111 District Map 6 Judicial Department 115 Table of Contents 7 Letter to Citizens 9 Superior Court Clerk of the Court Justice Courts Adult Probation Juvenile Probation Juvenile Detention Legal Defender 120 122 126 128 131 133 135 Library District 139 Public Defender 145 Public Fiduciary 149 Public Health Services District 154 Public Works 164 168 170 171 172 175 175 179 182 186 Budget Summary Budget Summary - General 15 Policies that Guide the Budget 20 Fund Types 30 Analysis of Revenues 31 Analysis of Expenditures 34 Department Expenditures by Function 36 Community Profile Location and History 37 Native American Populations 41 Tourism 43 People and Land 45 Economy 47 Mission Statement 52 Vision Statement 52 Engineering Fiscal/Contracts/GIS Fleet Operations Highways Office Administration Planning & Zoning Flood Control Code Enforcement Recorder/Voter Registration/Elections Strategic Plan 53 Sheriff/Patrol 194 Long-Term Non-Financial Goals 55 Sheriff/Jail 203 Organization Chart 56 Superintendent of Schools 207 Elected Officials /Department Directors 57 Treasurer 211 Elected Officials Biographies 59 Workforce Investment Act 215 County Leadership Capital Improvement Plan Department Profiles Administration/Board of Supervisors 72 Emergency Management Grants Administration Intergovernmental Affairs Risk Management Board of Supervisors Finance : Accounting Finance: Purchasing Finance: Special Districts Human Resources Assessor 73 74 75 76 78 80 83 86 88 93 Introduction Public Works Flood Control County Bonds 220 222 241 251 Summary Financial Statements 255 Tax Rates/Tax Levies 263 County Personnel 267 Schedules A-F 275 Glossary 299 8 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK LETTER TO CITIZENS 10 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LETTER TO CITIZENS FY 2011-12 July 26, 2011 Dear Citizens of Navajo County, Arizona Revised Statutes §11.705, §42-17101 — §42.17110 charges county boards of supervisors with the responsibility of passing a balanced budget each fiscal year. For fiscal year 2011-12, the Navajo County Board of Supervisors has adopted a balanced budget that reinforces our strategic priorities:       Provide Excellent Customer Service Ensure Safe Communities Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens Organizational Health and Fiscal Responsibility Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation Regional Leadership As you read through this budget presentation, you will be able to see how each department has identified goals that directly contribute to meeting the strategic priorities mentioned above. Guidelines for Budget Development In developing the budget for fiscal year 2011-12, the Navajo County Board of Supervisors was faced with similar financial challenges as prior years during the economic downturn. In an effort to provide direction and guidance to elected officials and department directors the Board of Supervisors adopted the following guidelines: 1. Protect employees. a. No new non-grant funded employees. b. Hold positions open when possible. c. Utilize special revenue funds for personnel and other expenses when possible. d. No anniversary raises. e. Evaluation of the 2.5% salary reduction. 2. No non-grant departmental budget increases. 3. Budget for expected increases for employee related expenses. 4. Limited capital expenditures for vehicles and equipment. These guidelines are nearly identical to those that were adopted for the fiscal year 2010-11. The primary change to the budget guidelines came in the form of language added to clarify that budget increases and new positions are authorized if grant funding is obtained. Protecting employees and minimizing lay-offs was a deciding factor for the budget guidelines. To achieve this objective in addition to salary reductions and forgone raises, vacant positions have been held open whenever possible, and new positions may not be added unless they are funded by a grant. 11 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LETTER TO CITIZENS FY 2011-12 Maintaining the financial position of the general fund was another critical influence in the budget process. In this effort, non-grant department budget increases were not allowed, while increases in certain anticipated employee related expenditures have been accounted for in the budget. In addition, travel expenditures have been strictly limited and purchases of supplies and services have been reduced to the greatest extent possible. Finally, expenditures for capital equipment and vehicles have been restricted to emergency replacement purchases only. State Budget – Legislative Impacts to Navajo County The Governor‘s initial estimate of the State of Arizona fiscal year 2011-12 budget deficit was approximately $1.147 billion. The budget deficit consists of $39.9 million in lost revenues and balance adjustments; as well as an increase in expenditures of $1.107 billion. The solutions proposed at the state level included $18.8 million in impacts to cities, and according to the Arizona County Supervisors Association, $93 million to counties. Arizona County impacts were related to the following: Highway Users Revenue Fund (HURF) Shifts to Department of Public Safety (DPS) The HURF revenues for Navajo County have decreased 18% from fiscal years 2007-2011. For Navajo County, the state‘s shift from HURF to DPS is estimated at $746,317, an increase of $275,000 over fiscal year 2010-11. The additional monies transferred from HURF to DPS in the 2012 budget will result in a reduction of the county‘s ability to provide services to the citizens of Navajo County. Navajo County HURF revenues are determined by a state formula largely based on fuel consumption, consequently higher fuel prices and more fuel efficient vehicles have resulted in lower HURF revenues in general over the last five years. Additionally, in the last 6 years (2007-2012) the DPS transfer from HURF has increased from 1% of total statewide revenues to 10%. The combination of reduced HURF revenues, a trend that is expected to continue, and increased diversion of HURF revenues to DPS has had and will continue to have a negative impact on the integrity and safety of our roads. Modernizations (including lane widening, adding lanes, shoulder improvements, and other improvements that require re-engineering the road pathway) are completely beyond current HURF funding levels. Additional transfers to DPS, or other state functions, will result in a further deterioration of the county‘s transportation infrastructure. On-going impacts from previous years: Requiring Counties to pay for 50% of the cost of Sexually Violent Prisoners (SVP) housed at the Arizona State Hospital (ASH) - Previously the county‘s responsibility required payment of 25% of the costs associated with treatment provided by the Arizona State Hospital for Violent Sex Offenders. For fiscal year 2011-12, the state has required Counties to pay 50% of the costs, at an estimated cost to Navajo County of $88,394. 12 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LETTER TO CITIZENS FY 2011-12 Payment for 100% of the Restoration to Competency (RTC) costs for applicable state prisoners - The estimated impact to Navajo County is $354,288. However, Navajo County has taken proactive steps to lessen this impact by entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Yavapai County to provide services to the state‘s RTC clients that resided within Navajo County. The IGA allows for quality care at a reduced cost to Navajo County. Reduction of State Share of Justice of the Peace (JP) Salaries - The State of Arizona permanently lowered the percentage it pays for JP salaries from 38.5% to 19.25%. This resulted in an increased cost to Navajo County of approximately $99,089. County Assistance Fund - Beginning in fiscal year 2009-10 the State County Assistance Fund began diverting revenues to pay for the State‘s debt service obligations. In fiscal year 2010-11 all distributions to counties were eliminated. This resulted in a permanent loss of $550,000 in general fund revenues. Increasing Costs Fiscal year 2011–12 also brought challenges due to increased costs.  Increased contribution rates for employee retirement plans, a total estimated increase of $256,000. Plan Name Elected Official Retirement Plan Public Safety Retirement Plan Corrections Officer Retirement Plan AOC – CORP Arizona State Retirement Arizona State Retirement – LTD    FY10 Rate 17.42% 21.93% FY 11 Rate 17.96% 24.50% Net Change .54% 2.57% 6.02% 11.64% 9.60% .25% 6.28% 13.13% 9.87% .24% .26% 1.49% 0.27% -0.01% Alternate Contribution Rates were adopted late in June 2011 by the Public Safety Retirement Plan and the Corrections Officer Retirement Plan. This will result in an increased cost of approximately $40,000. Indigent Health Care Costs Navajo County‘s contribution to the State of Arizona Long-Term Care System (ALTCS) increased by approximately $607,800 due to the elimination of the federal subsidy for the state‘s medicare program. Legislation Regarding Class Three Property Owners House Bill 2001 impacted homeowners that have multiple residences. Owners of second homes or vacation property will be required to sign an affidavit of ownership in order to obtain certain property tax rebates. This new requirement will significantly increase costs, estimated at $100,000 per year, for the Navajo County Assessor‘s Office. 13 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LETTER TO CITIZENS FY 2011-12 Short-Term Initiatives Navajo County has taken a number of proactive steps in an attempt to mitigate the impacts of the downturn in national, state and local economies and the effects of additional revenue reductions and additional costs.       Salary Reduction – A 2.5% salary reduction enacted July 1, 2009 remains in effect for fiscal year 2011-12. In addition, additional personal leave hours tied to the salary reduction in prior years was not awarded in fiscal year 2011-12 Combining of Elections Department with the Recorder’s Office - The combining of these departments allowed for the elimination of personnel and redundant services including streamlined processes. Reduction in Force (RIF) – Navajo County has had four separate reductions in workforce, an elimination of almost 30 positions. Voluntary Cost Savings Policy (VCSP) – In April 2011, the Board of Supervisors adopted a VCSP. This policy allows employees to request a reduced work week for a specified period of time. If approved by the department director, their schedule is altered for the pre-determined length of time at a cost savings to the department. Vacancy Management Strategy – As positions become vacant through attrition, each position is evaluated on a case by case basis by the department and Administration to determine if the position must be filled immediately or if it can be left vacant short-term or long-term. Critical functions such as those involving public safety have typically been filled. More than 40 positions are currently vacant through implementation of this strategy. Capital Purchases – Capital purchases have been severely restricted for the last three fiscal years. Therefore, replacement of all equipment and vehicles that are at the end of their useful life has been postponed. As the age of computers, vehicles, and other equipment grows, the probability of failures continues to increase. A small amount of funding has been set aside for replacements due to vehicle or equipment failures. Despite the economic realities described above, we remain hopeful that an improvement in revenue sources experienced in the last six months of the fiscal year 2010-11 will be sustained. Regardless of what the future holds, Navajo County is dedicated to providing its residents efficient services and effective leadership. It is a pleasure to serve as your Chairman on the Navajo County Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, David Tenney Chairman, Navajo County Board of Supervisors 14 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK BUDGET SUMMARY 16 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Budget Authority State law under A.R.S. §42-17101 and §42-17102 defines the schedule for public hearing and Board of Supervisors approval of the County preliminary budget, final budget, and property tax levy rates. The State Auditor General determines the guidelines for certain budget schedules of the budget document. Within the budget document there are schedules A through F, levy limit worksheet, and expenditure limitation. County management establishes the budget policy and administers the budgeting process to ensure that county departments adhere to the policy and understand the mission that has been defined by the Board of Supervisors. Navajo County Expenditure Limit History In November 2006, Navajo County voters approved Proposition 400 which restated the base year expenditure limitation. The expenditure limit is a constraint on the county‘s annual spending that was added to the Arizona Constitution in 1980. The limit is based on the county‘s actual 1980 expenditures and is adjusted each year for population growth and inflation. Basically, the service level provided in 1980 - the base year - is the benchmark for spending on today‘s essential services. Navajo County elected officials agreed that the expenditure limit, based on 1980 service levels, was not sufficient to meet the current demand for basic public services. Proposition 400 allowed the County to restate the base year expenditure limit which allowed for the allocation of resources to:  Public Safety - Increased law enforcement coverage and availability.  Transportation - Additional investment in transportation infrastructure.  Access to Services - Improvement of facilities and satellite offices to provide more accessible government services.  Quality Work Force - Focus on retention of staff, which reduced training and operational costs as employee turnover was greatly reduced. The proactive decision making of the Board of Supervisors has allowed Navajo County to better plan for the long-term financial sustainability of the county. Sound fiscal and budget management policies allow the County to better respond to the economic challenges that we face currently and in the future. 17 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Budget Basis The County prepares its budget on a modified accrual basis of accounting. This governmental basis of accounting means that revenues are estimated for the fiscal year if they are susceptible to accrual (e.g., amounts that can be determined and will be collected within the accrual period). Principal and interest on long-term debt are budgeted as expenditures when due, whereas other expenditures are budgeted for as liabilities expected to be incurred during the current period. Budget Administration The County‘s Final (or Adopted) Budget authorizes and limits any and all expenditures by county departments, functions and elected officials. The Board of Supervisors (BOS) has designated the County Manager as their agent to monitor and administer the budget, working through the Finance Department. The final budget adopted by the BOS cannot be increased during the fiscal year, except for certain grant-related funds. This requires that budgets be developed at 100% of total estimated sources. Any budget modifications to increase expenditures, including personnel, or to use contingency appropriations require BOS approval. For personnel services, the County Manager can approve temporary changes in staffing types that do not expand the number of positions or exceed the budget available for that position. Staff or budget increases in personnel services require BOS approval. Temporary employee services are controlled at the total budgeted amount rather than by position. The general fund budget is adopted as a modified lump sum budget, meaning amounts budgeted for salaries and employee benefits cannot be used for other types of expenses without prior BOS approval. Budget Planning Process Navajo County adopts its budget on a fiscal year basis beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 of the following year. The County Manager has the responsibility to develop and present a balanced proposed budget annually to the BOS for all County functions and agencies. This is accomplished in a two step process consisting of a preliminary budget submitted for approval in July and a final budget submitted in August after final property assessed values are available from the Arizona Department of Revenue and the Navajo County Assessor‘s Office. By statute, the final budget cannot exceed the preliminary budget in total. The following page outlines the significant dates in the budget cycle. 18 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 FISCAL YEAR 2012 — 13 BUDGET CALENDAR DATE DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED January 27 Preliminary FY12 expenditure limitation amount Arizona Department of Revenue / Economic Estimates Commission February 1 - 29 Departmental fund review & cash balance reconciliation Finance March 1 - April 6 FY12 budgetary data entry into New World Systems Departments March 13 - April 6 Meet with departments to review preliminary budget estimates Finance April 2 Final FY12 expenditure limitation amount Arizona Department of Revenue / Economic Estimates Commission April 6 Close department budget data entry Finance April 6 FY12 preliminary estimate of total available resources (i.e., revenues & fund balances) Finance April 6 Budget summary by department prepared for County Manager Finance April 9 Property valuation estimate Assessor April 13 FY12 total available resources estimate revised Finance April 9 - April 27 Meet with departments to review proposed budget revisions Finance April 9 - April 27 Preliminary FY11 accomplishments and FY12 goals & objectives Departments April 27 General Fund budget schedule compilation Finance May 22 - 23 FY12 budget hearings Board of Supervisors May 22 - 23 Final FY11 accomplishments and FY12 goals and objectives Departments May 24 - June 15 Meet with departments to review proposed budget revisions Asst. Co. Mgr. May 25 Assessed property value estimate Assessor June 29 Special district reimbursement schedule published Finance July 6 Special district FY12 budget remitted to BOS Districts July 10 Adopt preliminary budget Board of Supervisors July 24 Truth in Taxation hearing Board of Supervisors July 24 Adopt final budget Board of Supervisors Aug 20 Adopt tax levy rates for all Navajo County taxing jurisdictions Board of Supervisors 19 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Capital Outlay Budgeting Beginning in fiscal year 2008-09 the county prepared a five-year capital outlay budget. Deferred maintenance, furnishings and equipment were budgeted as capital outlay in the appropriate fund. Major construction projects will be budgeted in the Capital Projects Fund. The prior year‘s on-going projects and balances are detailed along with supplemental and new appropriations in the Capital Improvement Plan section of this book. Appropriations do not lapse for capital projects and the budget is under the administrative control of the County Manager. Budget Review Process The County Manager and Finance Director will meet with all elected officials and department directors to review budgets, identify budget goals, and establish budget priorities. The recommended budget is presented to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing and approval. Budgetary changes may occur from the Finance Director and County Manager meetings with elected officials and department directors and from the Board of Supervisors public hearing, and will be updated along with revenue estimates and year-end carry over. During the budget process, departments are required to provide revenue and expenditure estimates for the current fiscal year and planned revenues for the following year. The budget team uses these estimates to assist in updating the five-year financial plan which is used to monitor changes in available revenues and expenditure levels. Departments also provide an estimate of available fund balances in their special revenue funds to be carried over to the next fiscal year. Any changes to staffing levels are presented in the Navajo County Personnel section of this book. Contingency Funds Arizona law prohibits increases in budget appropriations of the general fund after the Board of Supervisors adopts the preliminary budget; therefore all available sources of funds are appropriated. The Board of Supervisors must approve use of general fund contingency amounts. The County Manager may approve the use of other funds‘ contingency amounts. Truth in Taxation A truth in taxation notice and hearing is required under ARS §42-17107, if the proposed primary property tax levy, excluding amounts that are attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied by the County in the previous year. Expenditure Limitation All Arizona counties are subject to annual expenditure limits set by the State of Arizona, Economic Estimates Commission. Changes in the annual expenditure limitation are based on inflationary and population factors. Budget Adoption Process Public hearings for the fiscal year 2011-12 budget were held May 24th and 25th, 2011. The Navajo County Board of Supervisors adopted a tentative budget on July 12th, 2011. After adopting a preliminary budget, the fiscal year 2011-12 budget cannot exceed budget expenditures. A balanced budget is defined as a budget where total expenditures do not exceed total revenues. The Board of Supervisors adopted the final budget on July 26, 2011. 20 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 How Policies Guide County Management and the Budget The Navajo County Finance Department has developed a set of fiscal management policies which guide budget recommendations. They will be reviewed and revised every year at the beginning of the budget process if necessary. The policies consist of:  Operating Budget Policy  Capital Budget Policy  Revenue Policy  Reserve Policy  Debt Policy  Budget Management Policy Operating Budget Policy  The county shall annually adopt a balanced budget by fund and department. A balanced budget is defined as a budget in which total expenditures do not exceed total revenues.  The county shall not use debt or bond financing to fund current operating expenditures.  The county shall generally use only recurring revenues to fund recurring expenditures. Nonrecurring revenues shall generally not be used to fund recurring expenditures.  The county shall maintain a budgetary control system to ensure adherence to the adopted budget and associated appropriations.  All departments shall share in the responsibility of meeting policy goals and ensuring long-term financial viability. Future service plans and program initiatives shall be developed reflecting policy directives, projected resources, and future service requirements. In order to ensure proper policy discussion, discontinuation (or "sunset") provisions shall be incorporated into service plans, as appropriate. Budgets are developed to support the Navajo County Strategic Plan.  The county will develop and annually update a five-year financial forecasting plan, which will include projections of revenues, expenditures, future costs of current budget decisions and costs, and financing of capital improvements.  Requests for increases in funding will be evaluated within the context of the request‘s financial impact on the county‘s financial condition on an on-going basis, the county‘s expenditure limitation, its impact on organizational performance, its future cost-benefit to the county, and its importance in accomplishing specific strategies of the strategic priorities for the organization.  The county shall move in the direction of identifying internal services that can be allocated to the different funds and departments of the organization. This allocation should be equitable, based on the use of these services. An indirect cost plan shall be prepared every year to determine the allocation basis for such services. 21 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12  Full reporting of all costs, direct and indirect, current and future, will be expected as part of new funding and service decisions. Grant funds will be expected to cover their full cost or be leveraged to the fullest extent possible.  When deficits appear to be forthcoming within a fiscal year, spending during the fiscal year must be reduced sufficiently to create a positive cash balance. This responsibility resides with the department. Capital Budget Policy The capital budget provides resources for capital maintenance and future capital needs, without adversely affecting the operating budget.  The county shall establish an adequate contingency for the maintenance and orderly replacement of capital assets. This is to protect the county‘s capital investments and minimize future maintenance costs.  The cost of all new capital projects should include a projection of the future maintenance costs of the assets.  Expenditures for maintenance supplies and materials or replacement items (other than motor vehicles) along with lease/purchase costs shall be budgeted as an operating item. These appropriations will not be placed in the capital budget.  The county shall purchase capital assets using pay-as-you-go financing whenever economically feasible. When economic and statutory constraints make pay-as-you-go financing impractical or financially unwise, the county will consider conservative borrowing to fund the acquisition of capital assets.  The county shall develop a five-year capital improvement plan (CIP) which shall be updated annually. The CIP shall be used to plan for major capital acquisitions, such as road construction projects, building construction or acquisition, and major building improvements.  The county shall develop a multi-year capital equipment replacement policy. Revenue Policy Funding for public programs should be derived from a fair, equitable and adequate resource base, while minimizing tax differential burdens.  The county will try to maintain a diversified and stable revenue structure to shelter it from the short-term fluctuations in any one revenue sources.  The county will follow an aggressive policy of collecting tax revenues. The county shall continuously explore new sources for revenue.  The county shall consider user fees, when appropriate, to fund services. User fees should be used when there is a direct relationship between the costs of the service and the user. User fees allow the county to provide services without increases to the general tax burden. 22 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12  The county will establish recovery rates for direct and indirect costs for user fees and charges. These shall be regularly reviewed to determine if pre-established recovery goals are being met.  The county will conservatively estimate its annual revenues by an objective, analytical process. This will include the use of historical trends, current local economic trends, national and global economic trends, and changes in State and Federal laws and policies. Reserve Policy Responsible reserve policies will provide adequate resources for cash flow and contingency purposes, while maintaining reasonable tax rates.  The county will maintain a contingency for cash liquidity purposes (i.e. designated fund balance) in the county General Fund equal to at least 10% of its annual operating budget.  The county will maintain a contingency account for the general fund‘s annual operating budget to provide for unanticipated expenditures, or to meet unexpected increases in service demands. Use of these funds is subject to the County Manager‘s approval. The County Manager will provide a quarterly activity report to the Board of Supervisors.  In other significant funds, currently the Highway User Revenue, and debt service funds, the county will maintain, whenever possible, a contingency fund for cash liquidity purposes (i.e. designated fund balance) equal to at least 10% of their annual operating budget. This will be evaluated on a fund by fund basis.  Available fund balances shall not be used for on-going operating expenditures unless a determination has been made that available balances are in excess of required guidelines and that plans have been established to address future operating budget shortfalls. For using fund balances, emphasis shall be placed on one-time uses.  An annual review of cash flow requirements and appropriate fund balances shall be undertaken to determine whether modifications are appropriate for the reserve/contingency policies. Debt Policy Responsible debt management policy maintains the county‘s ability to incur present and future debt at minimal interest rates in amounts needed for infrastructure and economic development without endangering its ability to finance essential county services.  The county will not fund current operations from the proceeds of borrowed funds.  The county will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements or projects.  When the county finances capital projects by issuing debt, it will repay the debt within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project. 23 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Budget Management Policy Overview  The Board uses the approved county fiscal policies and priorities to guide the county‘s budget process. Decisions are evaluated within these contexts as well as the accompanying five-year financial plan.  During the budget process, departments are asked to put together and evaluate a line item budget for revenues and expenditures as well as department accomplishments and measurable goals.  The timeframe for the budget preparation process is January through June of the prior fiscal year. All other times during the year are considered off-budget.  In accordance with state statutes, the county will adopt a tentative budget by the third Monday in July, and a final budget by the third Monday in August. The final adopted budget cannot exceed the total of the tentative budget. Departmental Responsibilities  Each department is responsible for managing its budget and ensuring compliance with these policies and procedures, i. e. performing the ongoing tracking of revenues and expenditures each month to guard against expenditures in excess of budget or the under-collection of budgeted revenues. Departments should be prepared to explain unexpected variances from the budget.  Departments may spend appropriations within their operations budget without formally reallocating the budget between line items. Budget compliance according to state statute is at the department or fund level.  Requests for transfers between salaries and the other budget categories should be submitted to the County Manager for approval by the department. The department should submit the request with an analysis of how this change will impact the department‘s budget. One-time salary savings cannot be used to fund recurring expenditures. The responsibility for projecting the ongoing impact will be calculated by the department and must accompany budget submissions.  To aid departments in managing their budgets, the Finance department should send out monthly expenditure and revenue reports to each department, and include a year-to-date percentage of budget for each line item. Capital Expenditure Carryover The Board of Supervisors adopts an annual budget which includes every department's approved expenditures for the year, with the dollar amounts distributed in detail according to the category of expense. Major expenditure categories are salaries, and capital. Policy guidelines and the criteria for requesting and approving carryovers are as follows: 24 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12  A department may request to carryover an approved capital expenditure appropriation into the next fiscal year when they do not expect to expend all of the appropriation for the project by the end of the current fiscal year. Requests to carryover operating budget items, however, should be limited to special studies or special projects, As with capital, the request should be based on the department‘s estimate that the project or study will not be completed in the current fiscal year.  Departments should submit carryover requests during the budget process when they identify current expenditure appropriations that will need to be completed in the next fiscal year.  Budget appropriation dollars must exist in the current year's annual budget so that there is already an appropriation that may be carried over to the next year. Requests for carryovers will be funded from the same source as the original appropriation.  The original budget appropriation from which the carryover is being requested will almost always be a one-time increment. If the carryover is approved then the carryover amount is a one-time appropriation in the next fiscal year's budget, and does not become part of that department's base budget.  Approved recurring increments become part of the base budget, and thus are "automatically" carried forward into future years.  Approval of carryover requests is subject to available funds. Grants and Special Revenue Funds need to specify the funding source for every carryover request.  The total actual expenditures for all years may not exceed the total project budget, regardless of the annual amount appropriated. The budget team reviews budgeted carryovers after the close of the fiscal year and adjusts them to meet this criteria. Capital expenditures are the most frequent type of carryover request. Often a project is begun in one fiscal year but must be completed in the next fiscal year. This is especially true of major road construction and maintenance projects, building construction or renovation projects, and purchases of major pieces of equipment where the delivery date is after the end of the current fiscal year. Salary and employee related expense (ERE) budget appropriations generally do not meet the criteria for carryovers. A request for additional staff must be submitted as an increment request, not as a carryover, since money for the additional full-time equivalent (FTE) is not specifically included in the current budget. Asset Policy Capital assets consist of assets of a relatively permanent nature, including land, land improvements, buildings, building improvements, vehicles, machinery, equipment, works of art and historical treasures, infrastructure assets, and construction in progress. Capital assets should be reported at historical cost. The cost of a capital asset should include ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended location and condition for use. Ancillary charges include costs that are directly attributable to asset acquisition. i.e. sales tax, freight, transportation charges, site preparation costs, and professional fees. 25 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Capitalization Policy  Machinery and equipment with unit costs of $5,000 or more and useful lives greater than one year will be capitalized and maintained on a capital asset list. The asset will be tagged, inventoried, and depreciated.  Assets costing between $1,000 and $4999.99 may be numerically tagged for stewardship purposes. Stewardship lists will be maintained jointly by the Asset Manager and the Department.  Any purchase or acquisition of an asset with a unit cost less than $1,000 will not be tagged inventoried or depreciated even if purchased with capital funds.  Title to state and federally owned equipment costing $5,000 or more with useful lives over one year remains vested in the state or federal government. Equipment must be managed in accordance with the state or federal agency‘s rules and procedures.  An inventory of all infrastructure $10,000 and over will be maintained. Infrastructure may be capitalized as a network, subsystem or as an individual asset.  Improvements other than buildings having a total project cost of $10,000 or more are to be capitalized. Improvement projects having a total project cost of less than $10,000 are properly classified as maintenance and/or repair items.  Capital Leases – Capital leases will be recorded as an acquisition of a capital asset and the incurrence of a liability. If the lease involves the acquisition of more than one asset, each asset may be capitalized if their fair value is $5,000 or more.  Buildings – Buildings costing $10,000 or more will be capitalized.  Land – Land costing $10,000 or more will be capitalized.  Operating Leases—A lease will be classified as an operating lease if the net present value of the Future minimum lease payments or fair value, whichever is less, is less than $5,000.  If title to the lease asset transfers to the county at the conclusion of the operating lease, capitalize the fair market value of the asset upon receiving title to the asset. Depreciation Policy  Depreciation is the allocation of the total acquisition cost of a capital asset over its estimated useful life. 26 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12  Land, certain land improvements, construction-in-progress, and non-exhaustible works of art, historical treasures and similar assets are not depreciated. Land is considered to have an unlimited useful life and its salvage value is unlikely to be less than its acquisition cost. Certain land improvements may be considered to have an unlimited useful life and therefore not depreciated. An example of a non-depreciable land improvement would include the movement or grading of dirt to prepare the land for its intended use. A non-depreciable land improvement should have permanent benefits.  The straight-line depreciation method, with an assumed salvage value of zero will be used to calculate depreciation on at least an annual basis. For any asset acquired (or placed into service) during the year, depreciation will be based on the full month convention, beginning with the first full month following the date of acquisition.  Depreciation expense is recognized for financial statement purposes only. For budgetary purposes, the full acquisition cost of a capital asset is recognized at the time of acquisition.  Total asset cost includes purchase price or cost of construction plus any other charges incurred to place the asset in its intended location and condition for use. Donated assets are valued at their fair market value at date of acquisition.  The estimate useful life of a depreciable asset is the period over which services are expected to be rendered by the asset.  Depreciation will be calculated on individual assets for buildings, equipment, vehicles and heavy equipment, computer hardware and software. Infrastructures will be depreciated based on the classification of the asset. Definitions  Land – This includes all land purchased or otherwise acquired by the county. The land account should include the cost of preparing the land for its intended use.  Buildings – This includes acquisition cost of permanent structures and related improvements. Permanently attached fixtures that cannot be removed without damaging the building or the item removed, such as heating and air conditioning equipment or security systems are classified with the related building.  Improvements Other Than Buildings – This includes the cost of permanent land improvements, leasehold improvements, and other improvements except buildings. Improvements in this account may include fences, retaining walls, sidewalks, and parking lots.  Machinery and Equipment – This includes all tangible personal property. Examples include machinery, tools, vehicles, equipment, and furniture.  Construction in Progress – This includes the cost of construction projects undertaken but not yet completed. 27 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY  FY 2011-12 Infrastructure – This includes long-lived capital assets that are normally stationary in nature and normally can be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital assets. Examples include roads, bridges, tunnels, drainage systems, water and sewer systems, dams, and lighting systems. Buildings, except those that are an ancillary part of a network of infrastructure assets, should not be classified as infrastructure assets. ASSET’S ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE Land Improvements Constructed Buildings Manufactured Buildings Infrastructure Assets Improvements Other Than Buildings Aircraft Heavy Trucks Light General Purpose Trucks Automobiles Office Furniture Capitalized Modular Furniture Works of Art and Historical Treasures Computer Hardware – Mainframe Computer Hardware – Midrange Computer Hardware – PC Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Equipment Office Equipment Computer Software – Mainframe Computer Software – Midrange Computer Software – PC Telecommunications Software Books Breeding Stock, Draft and Other Animals Intangible Capital Assets Leasehold Improvements 480 Months 480 Months 300 Months 420 Months 180 Months 180 Months 84 Months 60 Months 60 Months 60 Months 60 Months 600 months 60 Months 60 Months 36 Months 60 Months 96 Months 60 Months * * * * 120 Months 36 Months ** ** * If capitalized, life determined by the governing entity. ** Life determined by the governing entity. 28 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Navajo County Investment Policy It is the policy of Navajo County to invest public funds in a manner which will provide the highest investment return with the maximum security while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the entity and conforming to all federal and state statutes governing the investment of public funds. Scope This investment policy applies to all financial assets of Navajo County under the authority and control of the Navajo County Treasurer. These funds are accounted for in Navajo County‘s Annual Financial Report Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances existing at the time the investment is made, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the ―prudent person rule‖ standard and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal liability for an individual security‘s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments Objective The primary objectives, in priority order, of Navajo County‘s investment activities shall be:  Safety – Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of Navajo County shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. Acceptable levels of risk are as follows:  Credit Risk – The County limits its portfolio to investments with the top rating issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations.  Custodial Credit Risk – County securities that are held in a custody or safekeeping account must be held under the name of Navajo County or Navajo County Treasurer.  Concentration Risk – The County will diversify the investment portfolio by limiting investments to avoid over-concentration in securities from a specific issuer, excluding obligations issued or guaranteed by the United States or any of the senior debt of its agencies or sponsored agencies.  Interest Rate Risk – The County will purchase a combination of short, medium, and long term investments such that maturities occur evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow needed for operations. 29 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Navajo County Investment Policy—continued  Liquidity – Navajo County‘s investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable Navajo County to meet all operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated.  Return on Investments – Navajo County‘s investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the County‘s investment risk constraints and the cash flow characteristics of its portfolio.  Eligible investments and collateralization requirements are set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes §35-323. Delegation of Authority Authority to manage Navajo County‘s investments is granted to the Treasurer and derived from Arizona Revised Statute §11-491 regarding investments. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from conducting personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution and management of the investment program, or that could impair their ability to make impartial decisions. Authorized Financial Institutions No Navajo County deposit shall be made except in a qualified public depository as established by state laws. Authorized Investments and Collateralization Requirements Eligible investments and collateralization requirements are set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes §35-323. Safekeeping and Custody All security transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by Navajo County shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. Investment Policy Adoption Navajo County‘s investment policy and any modifications thereto shall be approved by the Navajo County Board of Supervisors. 30 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Fund Types Governmental funds—Most of the county‘s basic services are reported in governmental funds, which focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources and the balances of spendable resources available at year-end. These funds are reported using an accounting method called modified accrual basis of accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash. The governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view of the county‘s operations and the basic services it provides. Governmental fund information helps you determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the near future to finance the county‘s programs. The County maintains numerous individual governmental funds. The County reports the following major governmental funds: The General Fund is the County‘s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The Public Works/HURF Fund is used to account for road construction and maintenance of major and non-major regional roads, and is funded by highway user revenues and vehicle license taxes. The Flood Control District Fund is used to provide flood control facilities and regulates floodplains and drainages to prevent flooding of property in Navajo County and is funded by secondary property taxes. Fiduciary funds—Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. The County reports the following fund types: The investment trust fund account for pooled assets held and invested by the County Treasurer on behalf of county departments and other governmental entities. The agency funds account for assets held by the County as an agent for the state and various other local government units, other parties, and for property taxes collected and distributed to the state, municipalities, local school districts, community college district and special districts. 31 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Analysis of Revenues Revenue Sources  Taxes - comprised of real property and personal property. The amount of revenues expected for fiscal year 2011-12 is based on the tax rate that is levied. Navajo County levied the rate of .5984, which kept the total levy the same as fiscal year 2010-11, the only additional revenue that will be received is from new construction. New construction is estimated at $235,781, with the total amount of primary property taxes expected to be $5,970,898.  Other taxes - secondary taxes levied to fund the Navajo County Library District, Public Health Services District, Navajo County Flood Control District, and the Fire District Assistance Tax Fund. Projection: Revenues will decline slightly as assessed values of property fell an estimated 17% and tax rates remained at prior year levels.  Licenses and Permits - building permits, planning and zoning fees, and other miscellaneous licenses; i.e. cable TV and liquor license. These revenues fluctuate depending on the local economy. For fiscal year 2011-12, we are anticipating only a small increase to the combined total for building permits and planning and zoning fees.  Intergovernmental - State Shared Sales Tax, County Sales Tax, General Fund Vehicle License Tax, Payment in Lieu of Taxes, and other federal and state revenues. State Shared, County Sales Tax and the General Fund Vehicle Licenses tax are the three major revenue sources for the general fund. State Shared Sales Tax showed minor improvements in the last six months of fiscal year 2010-11, increasing approximately 4.8% over the prior fiscal year. Based on that trend, we budgeted for 3% growth, which will result in an additional $406,050 in revenues. While some months may exceed this projection, overall the projected growth of 3% is a conservative estimate and should be sustainable.  1,200,000.00 1,000,000.00 800,000.00 2005-06 600,000.00 2006-07 2007-08 400,000.00 2008-09 2009-10 200,000.00 - 2010-11 32 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Analysis of Revenues  County Sales Tax also showed minor improvements in the last six months of fiscal year 2010-11, increasing approximately 6.0% over the prior fiscal year. Based on that trend, we budgeted for a 3% growth, which will result in an additional $272,449 in revenues. 800,000.00 700,000.00 600,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 300,000.00 2008-09 2009-10 200,000.00 2010-11 100,000.00 -  General Fund Vehicle License Tax showed very slight improvement at the end of fiscal year 2010-11 and not consistently each month. This revenue source tends to fluctuate more than State Shared or County Sales Tax. July and August 2010 were both 10% under the budgeted amounts, however the majority of other months showed between 2.07% and 6.75% growth. Since July and August 2010 appear to have been an anomaly, they have been removed from consideration in projecting the fiscal year 2011-12 budget. We anticipate that the overall trend will continue to improve and have budgeted for a 3% growth, resulting in an estimated $59,571 in additional revenues. 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 2005-06 2006-07 100,000.00 2007-08 2008-09 50,000.00 - 2009-10 2010-11 33 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Analysis of Revenues  Charges for Services - Court, Assessor, Recorder, Treasurer fees and charges for other miscellaneous. services. The Assessor/Treasurer/Recorder fees have declined in recent years, however the rate of decline seems to have slowed and for the last two years has remained fairly consistent averaging approximately $268,000. Navajo County does not anticipate further declines or any increases to this revenue source.  Fines, fees and forfeits - Court fines, fees and forfeits. Fines, fees and forfeits are dependent on the county‘s ability to collect fines and fees that are imposed in our justice and superior courts. Navajo County does not anticipate any changes to this revenue source.  Investments - Investment income is revenues generated from the investment of the County‘s assets.  Miscellaneous - Proceeds from the sale of assets. County assets that are no longer in service are auctioned on PublicSurplus.com. Bidders can view photos for the auction items, bid online and make their payments online. Proceeds from the sale of assets varies depending on the quantity and types of items being auctioned. There should not be any significant changes to these revenues for fiscal year 2011-12.  Road Funds - Highway User Revenue Funds (HURF), Auto Lieu Tax, and other miscellaneous. road funds. HURF funds were impacted by cost shifts from the State of Arizona. The State swept funds totaling $13.1 million from all counties in an effort to a portion of the Arizona Department of Public Safety. Navajo County‘s portion for fiscal year 2011-12 was $746,317.  Public Health Services District and Library District - Includes revenues from secondary property taxes, grants, fees and other miscellaneous income.  Miscellaneous - Other revenues that do not fall into a more specific category.  Debt Service - Accounts for the accumulation of resources from secondary property taxes and operating transfers for general and special district long-term debt principal and interest. 34 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Analysis of Expenditures The Navajo County fiscal year 2011-12 budgeted expenditures held steady when compared with fiscal year 2010-11. While the expenditure level change was a very minor decrease, significant shifts within funds have been experienced. Many of these shifts are tied to changes at the state level, and the associated impact experienced by Navajo County. County expenditures are classified by the following functions, listed by percent of total expenditures: Public Safety, General Government, Highways and Streets, Health and Welfare, Debt Service, Culture and Recreation, Conservation, Special Items, Extraordinary Items, and Urban Redevelopment and Housing. Public Safety and General Government are the two largest of these functions, representing over 70% of expenditures. Public Safety The public safety function represents expenditures for Emergency Management, Jail, Sheriff, Juvenile Detention, Adult and Juvenile Probation, and Flood Control. Budgeted expenditures for public safety are $40,849,797 for fiscal year 2011-12, representing 35.86% of total expenditures. This amount represents a 22.79% increase over fiscal year 2010-11; largely attributable to $5,000,000 budgeted for jail construction. General Government General government is largely comprised of internal services, court services, and many of the county‘s offices under elected officials. These functions include: the assessor, recorder, treasurer, clerk of the superior court, constables, county attorney, justice courts, legal defender, public defender, superior court, facilities management, finance, human resources, information technology, and county administration. Fiscal year 2011-12 budgeted expenditures for general government are set a $39,860,079, or 34.99% of total expenditures. This figure represents a 12.91% decrease from FY11. Highway and Streets The expenditures for the highway and streets function are used for the public works department and certain special districts. The public works department is comprised of engineering, fiscal/contract/ GIS, fleet operations/animal control, highways, office administration, planning and zoning. Expenditures for fiscal year 2011-12 are budgeted at $19,752,827, representing 17.34% of county expenditures for the year. This figure is relatively consistent with the fiscal year 2010-11 amount, representing a 6.26% decrease in expenditures for fiscal year 2011-12. 35 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 Analysis of Expenditures Health and Welfare The health function accounts for county‘s Health Department and its programs. The public fiduciary and the Workforce Investment Act program make up the county‘s welfare function. Health and welfare is budgeted for $8,667,150 for fiscal year 2011-12, and constitutes 7.61% of annual expenditures. The fiscal year 2011-12 budget represents a 16.38% drop in expenditures from fiscal year 2010-11, due to the completion of a new health building during fiscal year 2010-11. Debt Service The debt service function is responsible for paying principle and interest for outstanding of the county including special district debts. Debt service has $1,481,053 budgeted in fiscal year 2011-12, or 1.30% of expenditures. Culture and Recreation Culture and recreation represents the county‘s library district. Fiscal year 2011-12 expenditures for culture and recreation are set at $608,076 or .53% of expenditures. Conservation The conservation function is responsible for the county‘s programs related to environmental programs, and is largely tied to expenditures related to an energy efficiency and conservation block grant awarded to the county. Expenditures are budgeted at $532,642 or .47% of total in fiscal year 2011-12. Environmental Environmental expenditures are budgeted at $250,000 in fiscal year 2011-12 and are designated for wild land fire recovery projects. Urban Redevelopment and Housing Urban redevelopment and housing expenditures in fiscal year 2011-12 are tied to a community development block grant, and are budgeted at $24,097. Education Education expenditures are budgeted at $339,829 for fiscal year 2011-12. This represents a slight increase from the $338,286 budget from fiscal year 2010-11. 36 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES Department General Government Administration X Assessor X Recorder X Public Safety Highways & Streets Health Welfare Superintendent of Schools Treasurer X X Adult/Juvenile Probation and Juvenile Detention X Clerk of Superior Court X Constabls X County Attorney X Flood Control X Justice Courts X Legal Defender X Public Defender X Sheriff Superior Court X X Health X Public Works X Facilities Management X Finance X Human Resources X Information Technology X Special Districts Education X Public Fiduciary X WIA X COMMUNITY PROFILE 38 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Location and History Location Navajo County is 9,959 square miles located in northeastern Arizona. The Mogollon Rim, an escarpment defining the southwestern edge of the Colorado Plateau, divides the County into two distinct climates. To the north is the ―high desert,‖ with elevations in excess of 5,000 feet with pinion juniper scattered across the landscape. Northern Navajo County is home to such geologic wonders as Monument Valley. South of the Rim is home to the world‘s largest stand of ponderosa pine, which covers the White Mountains at elevations from 5,000 to over 7,000 feet. The County seat is located in Holbrook. Navajo County shares borders with Coconino County on the west, Apache County to the east, Gila County to the south, and San Juan County, Utah to the north. History Navajo County was formed in 1895 as the final act of the Arizona Territorial Assembly before it adjourned at midnight. Pictured is the historic County Courthouse in Holbrook, the County Seat, which was founded in 1871. Legendary Commodore Perry Owens was Navajo County‘s first County Sheriff. Holbrook is also the starting point for the Annual Hashknife Pony Express ride. The horseback mail route covers 200 miles from Holbrook to Scottsdale. Each rider is sworn in as an honorary mail messenger; and braves the weather and terrain to deliver the United States Mail. Each February over 20,000 piece of mail are hand stamped and carried by the Hashknife Pony Express riders. Our very own Sheriff Clark leads the ride. 39 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Location and History Winslow was founded in 1882, named for either Edward F. Winslow, president of St. Louis and San Francisco Rail Road, which owned one half of the old Atlantic and Pacific Railroad or Tom Wilson, a prospector who lived in the area. The City of Winslow incorporated in 1900, and the last Harvey House along the Santa Fe Railroad opened in 1930. The Santa Fe Railroad closed the building in 1994, but it was purchased in 1997 by an independent investor and restored. It is now called the La Posada Hotel, and is considered the jewel of Winslow. Snowflake was founded in 1878 by William Jordan Flake and Erastus Snow, Mormon pioneers and colonizers. Today it is a town of approx. 5,603 residents and is home to a number of historic homes. Another site of interest is the Snowflake Latter-day Saint Temple, the second to be constructed in Arizona. It was dedicated by the late president of the Mormon Church Gordon B. Hinckley in 2002. Taylor was founded in 1881 and incorporated in 1966. The town was originally names for John Taylor, the third president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Taylor Museum opened in 2005 to show the development and growth in Taylor from its founding to present day. It is housed in the restored A.Z. Palmer/Hatch Brothers store in the center of Taylor. 40 COMMUNITY PROFILE N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Location and History Show Low is a city of approximately 12,400, established in 1870 and incorporated in 1953. According to legend, the city was named after a marathon poker game between C.E. Cooley and Marion Clark. The two men decided there was not enough room for both of them in their settlement. The two agreed to let a game of cards decide who was to move. According to the tale, Clark said, ―If you can show low, you win.‖ Cooley turned up the deuce of clubs (the lowest possible card) and replied, ―Show low it is.‖ The stakes were a 100,000 acre ranch. Show Low‘s main street is named ―Deuce of Clubs‖ in remembrance. Pinetop-Lakeside was founded in the early 1880‘s by Mormon pioneers. Lakeside derived its name from the area‘s lakes; such as Woodland lake (shown left). Pinetop derived its name from the nickname of a saloon keeper who served the Fort Apache soldiers. The two communities incorporated in 1984. Pinetop-Lakeside is home of the world‘s largest stand of ponderosa pine and is surrounded by the Apache/Sitgreaves National Forest. 41 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE Native American Populations of the Southwest Source: http://www.fgdc.gov/grants/2005CAP/projects/05HQAG0140_map FY 2011-12 42 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Native American Populations of Navajo County Hopi The Hopi Tribe is located in northeastern Arizona and occupies parts of Navajo and Coconino Counties. Hopi is a shortened name, derived from Hopituh Shi-nu-mu, which means ―The Peaceful People‖ or ―Peaceful Little Ones‖. The Hopi rely on livestock, primarily sheep, and agriculture to provide for their families. Maize is the primary crop that is grown and is central to the Hopi way of life. It is depicted in the Hopi Tribal flag shown at the left. Navajo The Navajo of the Southwestern United States are the largest Native American tribe of North America. The Navajo Nation is the largest land area assigned to the Native American jurisdiction within the United States, covering 26,000 square miles and stretching across three states. The symbolic Navajo Nation Flag is shown at right. On a tan background, the outline of the present Nation is shown in copper color with the original 1868 Treaty Reservation in Dark Brown. At the cardinal points in the tan field are the four sacred mountains. A rainbow symbolizing Navajo sovereignty arches over the Nation and the sacred mountains. In the center of the Nation, a circular symbol depicts the sun above two green stalks of corn, which surrounds three animals representing the Navajo livestock economy, and a traditional hogan and modern home. Between the hogan and the house is an oil derrick symbolizing the resource potential of the Tribe, and above this are representations wild fauna of the Nation. At the top near the sun, the modern sawmill symbolizes the progress and industry characteristic of the Navajo Nation's economic development. White Mountain Apache The White Mountain Apache Tribe consists of approximately 15,000 members, located in Navajo County and Gila counties. This isolated military outpost gained its notoriety through the soldiers‘ pursuit of renegade Apache leaders such as Geronimo and Cochise. Apache‘s original meaning is unknown, but it represents culturally related groups of Native Americans. The White Mountain Apache tribe owns and operates, Sunrise Ski Resort and Hon-Dah Resort and Casino. 43 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Tourism Holbrook boasts the Petrified Forest National Park, which features one of the world‘s largest and most colorful concentrations of petrified wood. The Petrified Forest area was designated a National Monument on December 8, 1906. The Painted Desert was later added and on December 9, 1962, the whole monument was made a national park. The park attracts tens of thousands of visitors each year. Winslow achieved national fame in 1972 in the Eagles song ―Take it Easy‖ which contained a verse ―standing on a corner in Winslow, Arizona.‖ Winslow now hosts the annual Standin‘ on the Corner Festival, which attracts vendors and visitors each summer. It is held in downtown Winslow. Snowflake is home to a number of historic homes, including Andrew Locy Rogers cabin, built in 1878. This small pioneer cabin was discovered within the smoldering ruins of a much larger house during a fire in 1988. The cabin had been converted into a small dining room when a home was built around it in the mid—1880‘s. Visitors may take a walking tour through Snowlake and view many other pioneer homes and historic sights. Taylor is the home of the renowned ―Firing of the Anvil‖ ceremony, a Standiford family tradition which takes place every 4th of July at 4:00 a.m. The ceremony is followed by a serenade of patriotic music from the Jennings Band. This unique tradition began with the Taylor pioneers and was revived in 1953. 44 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Tourism Show Low houses Fool Hollow Lake Recreation Area. The lake covers the tiny town of Adair, which was established by Thomas Jefferson Adair in 1885. The locals joked that only a fool would try and farm the place and the name stuck. Fool Hollow Lake opened in 1994 as a result of a partnership between Arizona State Parks, the U.S. Forest Service, Arizona Game and Fish, the City of Show Low, as well as corporate sponsors. Pinetop - Lakeside is home to Woodland Lake, a community recreational gem located in the heart of town. The park attracts thousands of visitors yearly for the following activities and facilities: fishing, hiking, bicycle trails, tennis courts, softball fields, equestrian trails, volleyball, boating, and playgrounds. Woodland Lake Park is a valuable asset for the people and wildlife of greater southern Navajo County. Navajo County is home of the historic landmark Monument Valley, called ‗Valley of the Rocks‘ it is arguably one of the most recognized images of the American West. Monument Valley has been featured in many films since the 1930s. 45 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 People and Land Statistics obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04/04017.html. Retrieved May 23, 20 11 46 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 People and Land Navajo County Population by City and Town Navajo County City of Show Low Town of PinetopLakeside 2010 Census 107,449 10,660 4,282 5,053 5,590 9,655 4,112 6,392,017 2000 Census 97,470 7,695 3,582 4,917 4,460 9,520 4,460 5,130,632 1990 Census 77,658 5,019 2,422 4,686 3,679 8,190 3,679 3,665,228 1980 Census 67,629 4,298 2,315 5,785 3,510 7,921 3,510 2,716,546 1970 Census 47,559 2,129 N/A 4,795 1,977 8,066 1,977 1,775,399 1960 Census 37,994 1,625 N/A 3,438 982 8,862 982 1,302,161 City of Holbrook Town of Snowflake City of Winslow Town of Taylor State of Arizona Statistics obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04/04017.html. Retrieved May 23, 20 11 47 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Economy Employment by Sector 2010 1400 3475 425 10125 3225 525 1125 1000 5125 650 Mining and Cons truction Educational & Health Srvs Financial Activities Governm ent Leis ure & Hos pitality Manufacturing Inform ation Profes s ional & Bus ines s Srvs Trade, Trans portation & Utilities Other Services 2008 2525 3425 600 10800 2975 725 800 1225 5725 625 SourcePrepared in cooperat ion wit h t he U.S. Depart ment of Labor, B ureau of Labor St at ist ics. A rizona Depart ment of Commerce, St rat egic Invest ment and Research. Figures are organized under t he Nort h A merican Indust rial Classif icat ion Syst em (NA ICS). Major Employers Employer Abitibi Cons olidated, Inc., (Catalys ts ) Snowflake APS, Jos eph City Bas has ', Taylor Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, Wins low Holiday Inn, Kayenta Kayenta Boarding B.I.A. School Keam s Canyon Indian Hos pital Navajo Governm ent Executive Branch Navajo Tribal Utility Authority, Keam s Canyon Safeway. Pinetop-Lakes ide Sum m it Healthcare, Show Low Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc. Northland Pioneer College, Holbrook Peabody Coal Co., Kayenta PFFJ, Inc., Snowflake Pinon Unified School Dis trict #4 Tate's Auto Center, Holbrook Wal-Mart SuperCenter, Show Low Wes tern Moulding Co. Inc., Snowflake Sources: Holbrook Chamber of Commerce; Navajo Nat ion, Navajo Nat ion, Division of Economic Development : Pinet op-Lakeside Chamber of Commerce: Show Low Regional Chamber of Employment Type Paper Mills Electric Services Retail Line-Haul Railroad Operation Hotels and Motels Education Medical Government Utilities Retail Hospital Utility Colleges Coal and Mining Pork Production Education Auto Dealer Retail Millwork 48 COMMUNITY PROFILE N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Economy Labor Force by Industry Winslow Holbrook PinetopLakeside Taylor Show Low Snowflake HeberOvergaard McNary Whiteriver Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 9 10 47 20 51 5 5 0 0 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 2 0 63 15 27 0 5 0 0 Utilities 24 9 3 8 69 21 2 0 0 Construction 46 136 253 84 214 24 18 0 1 Manufacturing 29 37 230 50 163 9 25 0 0 Wholesale Trade 92 51 11 37 274 36 2 0 1 693 265 78 199 2,180 263 31 0 13 Transportation and Warehousing 56 35 7 34 189 27 5 0 0 Information 51 123 11 14 94 33 3 0 9 Finance and Insurance 59 163 11 24 111 39 8 0 8 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 81 69 6 14 108 36 5 0 65 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 85 96 13 21 170 48 7 0 7 Management of Companies and Enterprises 15 4 0 4 16 9 0 0 2 Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 139 127 28 34 217 89 14 0 17 Educational Services 422 616 265 24 626 261 88 17 687 Health Care and Social Assistance 580 376 87 101 909 270 30 1 93 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 54 79 36 14 130 41 9 0 79 Accommodation and Food Services 423 466 89 118 661 217 24 0 56 Retail Trade Other Services (excluding Public Administration) Public Administration Total Labor Force www.censusbureau.gov 98 80 24 15 149 53 9 0 2 232 359 138 16 335 137 34 16 1,207 3,190 3,101 1,400 846 6,693 1,618 324 34 2,247 49 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COMMUNITY PROFILE FY 2011-12 Economy 50 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COUNTY LEADERSHIP “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” ~John Quincy Adams 52 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y MISSION AND VISION STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County provides the best customer service in a fiscally responsible manner, with courteous and dedicated elected officials and employees ensuring our public services meet and exceed the expectations of the citizens we are elected and appointed to serve. VISION Navajo County government shall provide leadership in partnering opportunities with stakeholders throughout the County. These partnerships with other government agencies, tribal governments, economic development representatives, educators, and citizens will enhance the quality of life and deepen relationships for citizens in all of Navajo County. NAVAJO COUNTY - STRATEGIC PLAN HIERARCHY Navajo County Vision Statement Navajo County Mission Statement Navajo County Strategic Plan Department Vision Statement Department Strategic Goals Annual Employee Performance Evaluation 53 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY - STRATEGIC PLAN Navajo County recognizes that the decline in the economy has impacted us as individuals and as an organization. Navajo County has been and will continue to be challenged to maintain mandated public services. Departments within the county are continually working together cooperatively to find additional ways to streamline the organization. Long-term planning is necessary to make the best decisions regarding efficient use of resources and overall plan for services. Navajo County is committed to excellence in customer service and fiscal responsibility. Through dedication to these principles we will be able to improve the quality of life for Navajo County citizens. The Navajo County Strategic Plan is an extension of the Vision and Mission of Navajo County and will guide departments in creating and achieving their internal goals for fiscal year 2011-12. Strategic Priorities and Goals for FY 2011-12 Provide Excellent Customer Service Ensure Safe Communities Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation Regional Leadership 54 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2011-12 Provide Excellent Customer Service Navajo County‘s primary responsibility is to our citizens. In all aspects of our service we will strive to be prompt, courteous, responsive, proactive and exceed the expectations of those we serve. Ensure Safe Communities Navajo County believes that it is important to ensure that the citizens of the county are able to live and work in safe communities. We will proactively and responsively work in partnership with our communities to lessen threats to the safety and welfare of our citizens. Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens Navajo County strives to educate and provide services to the citizens of our county. Through our educational programs and health clinics citizens are able to obtain services throughout the county. This proactive approach results in healthy citizens with an improved quality of life. Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility Navajo County implements sound fiscal and management policies to create a government that is accountable to our citizens and employees. We strive to maintain a quality workforce that is equipped with the resources needed to provide excellent customer service to our citizens. Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation Navajo County seeks to manage and conserve our natural resources while preserving our cultural heritage for our current and future citizens. We will strive to balance the current and future needs of the population with the proper management of our environment. Regional Leadership Navajo County strives to partner with local, tribal, state and federal governments, and legislative and elected officials to ensure that the county‘s resources are allocated efficiently and protected from external impacts. Navajo County and our stakeholders will provide leadership in the areas of economic and natural resource development, transportation, education and public safety. 55 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LONG-TERM NON-FINANCIAL GOALS FY 2011-12 In fiscal year 2010-11 Navajo County recognized the benefit in adopting Core Beliefs that guided all county departments throughout the budget process and ensuing fiscal year. Those core beliefs were: Provide Excellent Customer Service Fiscal Responsibility Improve the Quality of Life for Our Citizens. This was a good starting place for the county to begin thinking in terms of aligning goals from the highest levels (Board of Supervisors) of the organization to the front line employees. Departments made measureable goals that would assist the organization in meeting the core beliefs. For fiscal year 2011-12 Navajo County further expanded on the Core Beliefs, and adopted a set of Strategic Priorities. Again, each department has aligned their individual goals to the Strategic Priorities adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Each department has worked to make their goals measurable and meaningful to the operations within their departments and to meet the strategic priorities of the organization. In order to formalize and standardize this process, Navajo County will begin undertaking the process of adopting a formal five year strategic plan and implementing performance measures. This will be a lengthy process and one that must involve stakeholders countywide in order to achieve success. In fiscal year FY 2011-12 Navajo County will complete the following to contribute to the successful adoption of a five year strategic plan:     Develop a timeline from initial draft to final adoption of the strategic plan. Involve stakeholders in the process developing a five year strategic plan. Present initial draft to Board of Supervisors. Final adoption of Navajo County‘s five year strategic plan. For fiscal year 2011-12 Navajo County will complete the following to contribute to the implementation of performance measures:     Involve stakeholders in the process of identifying and adopting standardized performance measures. Work through mission statement, vision statement, and the five year strategic plan to guide development of meaningful performance measures. View the county‘s performance measurement program as a long-term journey rather than a short -term project. Adopt an implementation timeline. 56 Navajo County Organization Chart Voters NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County Attorney County Manager Administration Constable Winslow County Recorder Assistant County Manager Constable Snowflake County Assessor Clerk of the BOS Finance Director Constable Show Low Clerk of the Court Public Works Director Human Resources Director Facilities Management Director IT Director Health Director Constable Holbrook Constable Pinetop Constable Kayenta County Sheriff Superintendent of Schools County Treasurer Presiding Judge Judicial Branch Superior Court Judge Judicial Branch Superior Court Judge Judicial Branch Superior Court Judge Judicial Branch Court Administrator Superior Court Juvenile Director Judicial Branch Chief Probation Officer Judicial Branch Justice of the Peace Winslow Justice Court Justice of the Peace Holbrook Justice Court Library District Director Justice of the Peace Show Low Justice Court Justice of the Peace Snowflake Justice Court Legal Defender WIA Executive Director Justice of the Peace Kayenta Justice Court Justice of the Peace Pinetop Justice Court Public Defender Public Fiduciary NE AZ Training Center Manager Elections Director 57 Navajo County Elected Officials Board of Supervisors District I ......................................................................................................................... ….Jonathan M. Nez District II ............................................................................................................................ Jesse Thompson District III ........................................................................................................ J.R. Despain, Vice Chairman District IV............................................................................................................... David Tenney, Chairman District V............................................................................................................................... Jerry Brownlow Elected Officials Assessor .............................................................................................................................. Cammy Darris County Attorney ...................................................................................................................... Brad Carlyon Constable—Holbrook .............................................................................................................. Phyllis Romo Constable—Winslow ...................................................................................................... Pauline Hernandez Constable—Snowflake .............................................................................................................. Dave Wood Constable—Kayenta .................................................................................................................... Lita Dixon Constable—Show Low .............................................................................................................. Scott Tipton Constable—Pinetop—Lakeside............................................................................................. Ryan Reinhold Clerk of the Court .................................................................................................................. Deanne Romo Justice of the Peace—Holbrook ............................................................................................. Evelyn Marez Justice of the Peace—Winslow ............................................................................................ Alison Kolomitz Justice of the Peace—Snowflake ...........................................................................................Fred Peterson Justice of the Peace—Kayenta ............................................................................................... Susie Nelson Justice of the Peace—Show Low ........................................................................................... Stephen Price Justice of the Peace—Pinetop—Lakeside........................................................................... David Widmaier Recorder ............................................................................................................. Laurette ―Laurie‖ Justman Sheriff ............................................................................................................................... Kelly ―K.C.‖ Clark Superintendent of Schools ..................................................................................................... Linda Morrow Treasurer ......................................................................................................... Manuel ―Manny‖ Hernandez Superior Court—Division I ........................................................................................................ Ralph Hatch Superior Court—Division II ................................................................................................. Carolyn Holliday Superior Court—Division III ........................................................................................................ John Lamb Superior Court—Division IV ............................................................................................... Michala Ruechel 58 Navajo County Department Directors County Manager ................................................................................................... James G. Jayne Assistant County Manager ............................................................................. E.L. ―Dusty‖ Parsons Clerk of the Board ................................................................................................. Melissa Buckley Finance .................................................................................................................. James Menlove Human Resources ..................................................................................................... Shalice Cook Risk Management ......................................................................................................... Tim Norton Facilities Management ..................................................................................................... Dan Hinz Elections ................................................................................................................. Jonathan Roes Information Technology .......................................................................................... Robert Heming Court Administration ................................................................................................. Marla Randall Adult Probation ................................................................................................... Margie Brakefield Juvenile Probation/Detention .......................................................................................... Arno Hall Legal Defender ................................................................................................... Mariclare Hannah Library District ........................................................................................................ Geneva Durkee Public Defender .......................................................................................................... Dale Nielson Public Fiduciary .......................................................................................................... Sherry Reed Public Health Services District .............................................................................. Wade Kartchner Public Works .............................................................................................................. Homero Vela Workforce Investment Act ......................................................................................... Judy Bratcher 59 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Jonathan M. Nez—District I Nez is a lifelong resident of Navajo County and a current resident of Shonto, J onathan Arizona (the first LGA Governance-Certified Chapter of the Navajo Nation). He earned an undergraduate degree in Pre-Law and a Masters Degree in Public Administration from Northern Arizona University. During his undergraduate career, Mr. Nez completed internships at the state and federal levels. In the midst of completing a Doctor of Philosophy Degree at NAU, he made the hard decision of putting his academic aspirations on hold to run for Vice President of Shonto Chapter. Mr. Nez later accepted his communities‘ encouragement to run for council delegate and became one of the youngest legislators to serve on the Navajo Nation Council. During his first term as Council Delegate, Mr. Nez found a great need for representation within the state government and decided to bid for the position of Navajo County Board of Supervisor and successfully became the Supervisor for District 1. Mr. Nez is a graduate of Monument Valley High School and the proud father of Kelly and Sean Nez who carry on their father‘s positive actions of athletics and academics at MVHS. Their younger brother, Christopher Nez frequently attends Chapter meetings and has accompanied his father on the campaign trail. Jonathan is the husband of Phefelia Nez, son of John and Mabel Nez, and the grandson of former Councilman/Businessman H.T. Donald and Mae Donald. Jonathan is Ashįį hi, Ta‘néészahnii, Tó dich‘ íi‘nii, and Tá ‘chii‘nii. Jesse Thompson—District II J esse Thompson has served on the Navajo County Board of Supervisors since 1992. Prior to his election as a supervisor, he worked for the Navajo Nation Navajo Hopi Land Commission and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as a Tribal Operations Specialist. Supervisor Thompson serves on the following local, state and national committees: National Association of Counties Justice and Public Safety Steering Committee, Navajo Nation Partnership Steering Committee, Hopi Tribal Partnership Steering Committee, Northern Arizona Council of Government TPAC Tribal Government representative, and Northern Arizona Regional Behavioral Health Authority. He is also affiliated with the County Supervisors Association, Arizona Association of Counties, National Association of Counties and Tri-State County Elected Officials group. Supervisor Thompson actively participated in the development and construction of the Winslow and Holbrook Stabilization Centers. Supervisor Thompson‘s priorities include Reservation school bus route road and transportation improvements on both the Navajo Nation and Hopi Reservations, Veteran‘s Affairs, education for youth and he currently works cooperatively with Navajo Nation Southwest Veteran‘s Organization. Supervisor Thompson and his wife, Louise, reside in Teesto, Arizona, and have five children and six grandchildren. 60 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 J.R. DeSpain, Vice Chairman—District III DeSpain was elected to the Board of Supervisors in 2000 and was the J .R. Chairman in 2008-2009. Prior to becoming a Supervisor, he was the Navajo County Treasurer from 1978 to 2000. Supervisor DeSpain was the Arizona Association of Counties Treasurer President from 1982-84, Navajo County Fair Board President in 1981, Little Colorado RC&D President from 2001-03 and 2005 President of Navajo County Cattlemen and 2007 President of Arizona Association of Counties‘ Board of Directors. He is the past Chairman of the Northern Arizona Council of Governments (NACOG) serving on the NACOG Regional Council. He is Navajo County‘s representative to the National Association of Counties‘ Labor and Employment Steering Committee, serves on the Arizona Statewide Water Advisory Group, serves on the Working Group for BRP on Water Sustainability Group, sits on the Silver Creek Watershed Alliance, and is a representative to the North Regional Homeland Security group. Supervisor DeSpain and his wife, Linda, live at Obed Ranch, south of Joseph City. They have five children and four grandchildren. David Tenney, Chairman—District IV D avid Tenney was elected to the Board of Supervisors in 2004 and currently serves as Chairman of the Board. Born and raised in Heber, Supervisor Tenney has spent most of his life in Navajo County as a small business owner and community volunteer. Supervisor Tenney has served on a number of local, state and national committees: Natural Resources Working Group, Navajo County Regional Development Council, County Supervisors‘ Association Legislative Policy Committee, Silver Creek Watershed Alliance, Eastern Arizona Counties Organization, Environmental Economic Communities Organization and the Four Forest Restoration Initiative Steering Committee. Significantly, Supervisor Tenney currently serves as the President of the County Supervisors Association of Arizona and is a former member of the National Association of Counties Board of Directors. Previously, Supervisor Tenney also serve for three years on the Navajo County Planning and Zoning Commission and for nine years on the Show Low Unified School District Governing Board. Supervisor Tenney graduated from Snowflake High School in 1982. He served a mission to Bogota, Columbia for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in 1983-1984 and later attended Mesa Community College and Brigham Young University. Supervisor Tenney and his wife, Gay, married in 1987 and are the proud parents of six children. They currently reside in the Linden community. Supervisor Tenney‘s hobbies include hunting and football with his boys, singing with his daughter and traveling with his wife. 61 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Jerry Brownlow—District V Brownlow is a native born Arizonan, raised in Prescott and has lived in J erry the White Mountains for 35 years. He was elected to the Board of Supervisors in 2000 and represents District 5 in the southern part of Navajo County. Prior to serving with the Board, he was elected as Constable of the Pinetop Justice Court in 1996. He serves on the following committees: Chairman of the White Mountain Regional Transportation Committee, member of the County Supervisor‘s Association, Board Member of the White Mountain Stewardship Contract Monitoring Board, Natural Resources Working Group, Adaptive Management Oversight Committee for the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Project, past President of the Blue Ridge Scholarship Fund, member of the White Mountain Sheriff‘s Posse. Supervisor Brownlow and his wife, Colleen, have two children and five grandchildren and live in Pinetop-Lakeside. Cammy Darris—Assessor C ammy Darris was elected as County Assessor in 2004. She has been with Navajo County Assessor‘s Office for 26 years. She is currently serving as President of the Arizona Association of Assessing Officers and has also served as past secretary/treasurer for the organization. She is the Navajo County representative for the Arizona Association of Counties. Locally, she has served as vice chairman of the Navajo County Personnel Commission. She has completed the Certified Public Management program through ASU. Cammy holds a Level I and II appraisal certification from the State of Arizona and has received a personal property certification. Cammy has over 30 years of appraisal experience and is familiar with all aspects of the Assessor‘s Office, starting as a file clerk in the department. Cammy continues to attend numerous schools and workshops to ensure she is aware of current statutes and changes to the Arizona Property Tax System. Cammy was born and raised in Navajo County. She and her husband Kent have two children, Craig Darris and Sherri Manygoats, and one granddaughter, Breeana Darris. 62 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Brad Carlyon—County Attorney B rad Carlyon‘s legal career began with the regional law firm as a litigator. Brad acted as collection counsel for a number of state financial institutions. Brad worked on complex civil litigation cases involving lender liability, defamation, and professional liability. Brad was a partner in the Pinetop law firm of Higgins, Carlyon and Shaffery. Brad has served as a Chief Deputy County Attorney in Apache County and as a Deputy County Attorney in Navajo County. Brad has maintained a high conviction rate while prosecuting the most serious criminal, civil and juvenile cases. Brad has been nominated for Arizona Prosecutor of the Year numerous times. In addition to his public and private law practice Brad also brings a perspective from the bench; having served as a Navajo County Superior Court Judge pro tem for over three years. Brad was raised in Payson. He attended Northern Arizona University and obtained a degree in business administration-finance. After graduating, Brad worked for the Arizona State Legislature as a Research Economist Intern for the House Appropriations Committee. After the legislative session ended, Brad worked for the United States House of Representatives for an Arizona Congressman as a District Field Representative; covering Navajo and Apache counties. Brad graduated magna cum laude from the University of Arizona College of Law. He served as Managing Editor of the Arizona Law Review and received numerous honors including the Outstanding Editor and the Rosenberg Distinguished Editor awards. Brad‘s achievements during law school were realized while he worked to support his family. He is married to Anna and has three children; Tiffany, Thadeus and Arius. Deanne Romo—Clerk of the Court D eanne is a lifelong resident of Navajo County and has been a dedicated employee with the Navajo County government for the past 30 years. It has been a privilege and an honor to work for the great people of Navajo County, which also includes the Navajo Nation and the Hopi and Apache Tribes. Deanne is married to her high school sweetheart, Tommy Romo, and has three children; Nicki, Tommy and Aleah. Deanne feels blessed to have such an amazing, strong, support system. Deanne is proud to have been raised with personal and professional qualities such as: honesty, trustworthiness, dedication and the will to succeed. The Clerk of the Court requires a great deal of organizational skills and it is her desire and goal to serve the citizens of Navajo County to the best of her abilities. Deanne feels fortunate to be surrounded by a highly trained staff that is extremely knowledgeable. Their professionalism and expertise are limitless. I am very grateful to the wonderful citizens of Navajo County and am deeply appreciative of their support. 63 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Evelyn Marez—Holbrook Justice of the Peace E velyn Marez is the Justice of the Peace for Precinct One. Judge Marez was elected to the bench in the 2010 election. Judge Marez comes to the bench with 30 years experience in criminal justice. Her recent position as Director of Victim Services for the Navajo County Attorney brings 10 years of experience in grant administration, budget/office administration and legal research. Her previous 20 years employment in the Clerk of the Superior Court, Judicial Assistant, and Adoption Coordinator brings invaluable experience with all types of cases, including civil, criminal, domestic relations and juvenile. Judge Marez gained extensive knowledge in training and supervising, court budget, managing court calendars and developing and implementing new policies and procedures. Having worked closely with many Superior Court Judges, Marez has a thorough understanding of court operations. ―The most important lesson learned in 30 years is the importance of serving the public in a professional, helpful, and friendly manner.‖ Judge Marez has served the public through many community programs, including: Past PresidentArizona Coalition of Victim Services, Arizona Sexual Assault Network, Navajo County Interagency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, Navajo County Coalition for Domestic Violence, Citizens Advisory Counsel for the Holbrook School District, Holbrook Women‘s Civic Club. Judge Marez is married to Manuel and has two children (Reanna and Leah) and two grandchildren (Alexa and Logan). Alison Kolomitz—Winslow Justice of the Peace E lected in 1998, Alison Kolomitz is currently serving her fourth term as Justice of the Peace. Judge Kolomitz moved to Winslow in 1969 after graduating from High School in Colorado. She was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad for several years, and then was able to stay at home to raise her two children, Tiffany and Bart. In 1991 she began her career with the courts as a clerk and pro tem magistrate in the Winslow City Court. In 1995 she was hired as Lead Clerk in the Winslow Justice Court and again appointed as pro tem judge and was elected JP in 1998. She is Associate Presiding L.J. Judge of Navajo County. Judge Kolomitz held the office of Treasurer for the Arizona Justice of the Peace Association for many years, she is a member of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, a Committee member of the DUI Case Processing Committee, was on the Board of the Northeastern Arizona Big Brothers/Big Sisters and is currently a Big Sister. She is also a member of Winslow Soroptimists and Winslow Chamber of Commerce. For the past twelve years, Judge Kolomitz has taken the Court to the people of the Navajo reservation each month and handles Winslow Justice and City Court cases there, saving people a trip to Winslow. 64 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Fred Peterson—Snowflake Justice of the Peace T he Honorable Fred L. Peterson has served as Justice of the Peace in Snowflake Justice Court since 1995. This Justice Court Precinct includes the Heber-Overgaard area as well as Forest Lakes, Cedar Hills, Snowflake Taylor and Shumway. Judge Peterson holds a masters degree in counseling and human relations and has served on the Snowflake Town Council. He is past president of the Arizona Justice of the Peace Association; and served as Presiding Justice of the Peace in Navajo County from 2003-2004. He is also a past member of the Arizona Judicial Council. Judge Peterson is a symbol of leadership in his community because of his guidance, family values, and gentile nature. In 2004 he was nominated, and won, the Kenneth L. MacEachern Memorial Award, the highest award of the National Judges Association. Susie Nelson—Kayenta Justice of the Peace Susie Nelson was born in Monument Valley, Utah. She is the first-born of 7 children. She was raised in Shonto, AZ. She attended grade school at Shonto Boarding School. She graduated from Tuba City High School in 1979. She attended Northern AZ. University. Ms. Nelson has three children, Michael and Latasha are in college and Wesley is a freshman in high school. Ms. Nelson worked with the Navajo Nation Courts for 9 years, hired as a microfilm clerk and worked her way up to the Chief Court Clerk. In 1999, she made her transition to the Kayenta Justice Court as a court clerk to the former Justice of the Peace Evelyne E. Bradley. Upon Judge Bradley‘s retirement in January 2007, she was appointed Justice of the Peace for the Kayenta Justice Court by the Navajo County Board of Supervisors. She ran for election in 2008 and prevailed and again in 2010. 65 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Stephen Price—Show Low Justice of the Price is starting his third term as Show Low Justice of the Peace and J udge also serves as the City of Show Low Magistrate. Prior to being elected in 2002, Judge Price served Navajo and Apache counties as a pro-tem judge for over three years. Steve retired from the Phoenix Police Department in 1998 after serving the community for 25 years. Steve is married to LaRee and between them they have six children and seven grandchildren. David L. Widmaier—Pinetop –Lakeside Justice of the E lected in 2000, Judge Widmaier is currently serving his fourth term as Justice of the Peace. Judge Widmaier grew up in Phoenix attending Bourgade High School. After graduation, he joined the United States Marine Corps. He graduated from Glendale Community College and Northern Arizona University 1979 moving to Pinetop in 1980. In 1986 Widmaier was awarded a Rotary International Fellowship, as Ambassador of Good Will. He attended the University of Wales, Gwent C.H.E. graduating with a BTECH H.N.D. (M.A.) in Documentary Photography. In 1987 he returned to Pinetop-Lakeside where he opened a small business. He returned to school in 1989, finalizing a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Phoenix. He continued on in business while teaching as Associate Faculty at Northland Pioneer College. He has recently graduated from California Southern University Law School with a Master of Science in Law, Magna Cum Laude. He is currently Presiding L.J. Judge of Navajo County, past President of the Arizona Justice of the Peace Association for four years, Past President of the White Mountain Rotary Club (X2), active member of the American Legion, and the Knights of Columbus. He is currently a Mentor/Faculty member at the Arizona Judicial College and serves on several committees for the Arizona Supreme Court including, the Arizona Judicial Council. 66 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Laurette ―Laurie‖ Justman—Recorder L aurette Justman was elected as County Recorder in 2000. Before being elected as County Recorder, she started working in the Voter Registration Department of the Recorder‘s office, soon after in 1989 she was appointed Chief Deputy Recorder and served the county in that capacity for 10 years. Then in 1999 she was appointed County Recorder by the Board of Supervisors. She has been with the Navajo County Recorder‘s Office for 27 years. She is a past Recorder‘s Association President and is a member of the Arizona Association of Counties, the Recorders Association and the International Association of Clerks, Recorders, Election Officials and Treasurers. Laurie is certified in Elections with the Secretary of State‘s Office and is certified nationally as an Elections/Registration Administrator by the Election Center. She is a Certified Public Manager which she acquired through the Certified Public Management Program at ASU. In addition, she is serving as a member of the Navajo County Personnel Commission. Laurie has been a resident of Navajo County all her life. Laurie and her husband, Richard, have been married for 30 years and have three children. Kelly ―K.C.‖ Clark—Sheriff K elly ―KC‖ Clark was elected Navajo County Sheriff in 2008 and has served in the Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office since 1989. Sheriff Clark is an Arizona Certified Police Officer, having graduated from the Northland Pioneer College Police Academy, and is a graduate of the 220th F.B.I. National Academy and the Drug Enforcement Administration‘s Drug Unit Commander‘s Academy. Sheriff Clark has been supervising Criminal Investigations for 14 of his past 24 years with Navajo County. This unit includes the multi-agency drug task force, Major Crimes Apprehension team (MCAT), the Medical Examiner Investigators, K-9 unit, Internal Investigations and the Sheriff‘s Criminal Investigations unit. Sheriff Clark was one of the first law enforcement officials in Navajo County to partner with the Navajo County Drug Court Program and also assisted in forming the Navajo County Drug Coalition. Sheriff Clark is serving in an unprecedented second term as the Vice President for the Arizona County Attorney and Sheriff‘s Association in addition to being a member at large for the Northern Regional Advisory Committee for Homeland Security. He is also an appointed member of the Arizona Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee and President of the Arizona Narcotic Officers Association. Additionally Sheriff Clark is a member of several civic organizations within the Navajo County community. The Sheriff‘s Office is comprised of many units: Jail, Patrol, Communications, Criminal Investigations, Evidence, Administration, Training, and Search and Rescue. The Sheriff‘s Office also sponsors the Sheriff‘s Auxiliary Volunteers who assist the Sheriff‘s Office in numerous areas whenever called upon. Sheriff Clark has been a resident of Navajo County for the past 28 years. He and his wife Brenda have five children and have lived in Holbrook for the past 17 years. 67 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Linda Morrow—Superintendent of Schools L inda Lee (Rawlings) Morrow is a native Arizonan, raised in Show Low. A graduate of Snowflake Union High School, she completed her BA in Elementary Education at the University of Arizona. Linda taught in Tucson for a number of years before moving back to Navajo County to be closer to family. She taught in the Snowflake, Show Low and Blue Ridge school districts, completing her MA in Elementary Education with an emphasis in Mathematics Education. Linda was the Education Service Agency Director prior to being appointed as the Navajo County Superintendent of Schools, taking office in January 2006. She was elected in 2006 to complete the remaining term and elected again in 2008 for a four-year term. Superintendent Morrow has been associated with the following: leadership positions in the AZ Science Teachers Association, the AZ Association of Teachers of Mathematics, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and the National Council for Supervisors of Mathematics. She is currently the President for the AZ Association of County School Superintendents for 2011. Linda is also a member of the Steering Committee - Navajo County Drug Project, the Navapache Administrators Association, the Northland Youth Coalition, and the Yellow Jacket Youth Center. She and her husband, Jim, have three grown children, four 1/2 grandchildren, three dogs and a very precocious cat. Manuel ―Manny‖ Hernandez—Treasurer M anny Hernandez was elected County Treasurer in 2001. Prior to his election, Manny was with Safeway Stores, Inc. for 28 years, with 16 of those years as the store manager of Safeway in Holbrook. Manny is a life-long, born and raised resident of Navajo County. He is a past president of the Holbrook Rotary Club and a past member of the Holbrook Chamber of Commerce. He is affiliated with the following organizations: member of the Legislative Policy Committee to the Arizona Association of Counties, Past Chairperson for the Navajo County Personnel Commission, and past President and current Secretary/Treasurer to the Arizona County Treasurer‘s Association. Manny and his wife, Doris, have been married for 30 years. They have three children and five grandchildren. Manny is a graduate of Rockland Computer Institute, Phoenix Arizona, successfully completed business classes at Phoenix College and Scottsdale Community College and efficiently completed requirement classes at A.S.U. in the Ramsey Executive Education Public Programs and Public Affairs school receiving certification as a Certified Public Manager. 68 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 Ralph Hatch—Division I Ralph Hatch was born and raised in Holbrook, Arizona. After graduating J udge from Holbrook High School, he attended Brigham Young University where he graduated with a BA in Chinese Language. Judge Hatch graduated from Arizona State University Law School in 1984. He began his legal career that same year when he was hired by Navajo County to work as a Deputy County Attorney. Judge Hatch worked for 19 years as a Deputy County Attorney. In 1989 he left the County Attorney‘s office temporarily to become the founding Navajo County Legal Defender where he served for one year before returning to the County Attorney‘s office. In 2005 Judge Hatch was sworn in as the Holbrook Justice of the Peace and the Holbrook City Magistrate where he served through December, 2010. From 2005 to 2010 Judge Hatch was also appointed by the Arizona Supreme Court to serve as a Superior Court Judge Pro Tempore. In November, 2010, Judge Hatch was elected by the citizens of Navajo County to serve on the Superior Court Bench in Division I. Judge Hatch is married and has four children. Carolyn Holliday—Division II C arolyn Holliday was elected to the Superior Court bench in Navajo County in 2008. Currently she is the Presiding Judge of the criminal bench. Judge Holliday was first elected in 1996 being one of the first women elected to the Superior Court in Navajo County. In 1999 she was the first woman to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as Presiding Judge in Arizona. Judge Holliday grew up in Lake Forest, Illinois and graduated from the University of Illinois with a degree in Psychology and French. She started her legal career over 25 years ago having graduated from the University of Arizona in 1983;. She was an editor of the Journal of International and Comparative Law. As a deputy county attorney, she prosecuted child support cases in Pinal and Navajo counties. In private practice she focused in the areas of criminal defense and family law. During her career she has served as President of the Arizona Family Support Council and the Navajo County Bar Association. She had received the Legal Services award for volunteer work. She has served on various committees of the Arizona State Bar dealing with criminal and family law issues. She lives in the White Mountains with her husband Trevor Holliday, and their two sons. The Holliday‘s have a variety of interests that include travel, hiking and reading. 69 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ELECTED OFFICIALS FY 2011-12 John N. Lamb - Division III Lamb has been a trial judge in Navajo County for over fifteen years. He currently J ohn sits as Superior Court Judge in Division III. Judge Lamb earned his bachelor‘s degree from Stanford University, his master‘s degree in public affairs from the University of Texas (L.B.J. School of Public Affairs) and his law degree from Northwestern University, where he served as Student Body President. Currently serves in the following appointed positions: Judicial College of Arizona (2000-Present) - Co-Editor Criminal Bench Book - Book used by judges to conduct trials and hearings. Evidence for Limited Jurisdiction Judges - Primer on evidence. Member of the Editorial Advisory Board for Wendell-The Arizona Judicial Reference Site, and the Arizona Judicial Law Review - Reviews and edits submitted articles and approves or disapproves of their content. Faculty - Teaches several judicially related courses to new judges. Member of New Judge Orientation Court Curriculum Committee - Decides what courses and topics to teach new Arizona judges. Review tests given to judges at the orientation program. State Bar of Arizona — Member of Criminal Jury Instruction Committee (2005-Present) - Committee drafts standard jury instructions used by judges throughout the state in criminal trials. Member of State Bar Conflicts Case Committee (2010-Present) - Committee processes, investigates and prosecutes disciplinary cases involving members of the State Bar's Board of Governors, State Bar staff or the Court's Disciplinary Commission. Michala M. Ruechel—Division IV M ichala Ruechel was born on November 30, 1961, in Portales, NM. Michala‘s family moved to Tuba City when she was three years old. She lived there until she graduated from High School. After High School she attended Arizona State University where she graduated with honors with a Bachelors Degree in Political Science. She obtained her law degree in 1985 from ASU and returned to Northern Arizona to practice law. In 1986 Michala began working as a Prosecutor for the Navajo County Attorney‘s Office. In 1990, she began working for the Navajo County Superior Court as a judicial law clerk. In 1993, she became Commissioner for the Superior Court‘s Child Support Division and served as a Superior Court Judge Pro Tempore until 2006 when she was appointed as Navajo County Superior Court Judge for Division IV by Governor Janet Napolitano. Michala currently resides in Holbrook, Arizona. She is married to Joel Ruechel, they have three children. Michala was appointed as the Presiding Judge of Navajo County in 2008. She also serves as Presiding Juvenile Court Judge; and serves on several statewide commissions including: Child Support Review Committee; Committee on Superior Court; Committee on Juvenile Courts; and the State, Tribal, Federal, Court Forum. Her case assignments include: Juvenile Dependencies; Juvenile Delinquencies; Probate; guardianships; domestic relations; and conflict cases involving civil and criminal matters. 70 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DEPARTMENT PROFILES 72 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager/ NC Emergency Manager Clerk of the Board Government Affairs Director NATC Director Executive Secretary Finance Director Grants Administrator Accountant Accountant Accountant Senior Accountant Human Resources Director Deputy Director Human Resources Deputy Finance Director - Operations Senior Secretary Senior Secretary S. County Risk Manager Financial Analyst Purchasing Assistant Human Resources Technician Account Specialist (2) Office Support Specialist MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County Administration proudly serves their citizens and customers with a four-fold commitment:  Exemplary customer service.  Retaining and recruiting a quality workforce.  Maintaining a safe work environment.  Providing an accountable financial system that provides for the economic stability of the county. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Navajo County Administration is comprised of the following sub-departments: Board of Supervisors, Finance (including the Purchasing and Special Districts), Human Resources, Intergovernmental Affairs, Emergency Management, Risk Management and Grants Administration. These subdepartments do not have separate budgets and therefore all budget and full time equivalent (FTE) information is presented for Administration as a whole. 73 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Attended Arizona Division of Emergency Management‘s County Emergency Managers Meeting on a quarterly basis.  Attended Burlington Northern Santa Fe tabletop exercise.  Completed a full revision of the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).  Core Emergency Operations Center team and the Board of Supervisors are compliant with Incident Command System (ICS) 700 and 800 training.  Participated in the update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan.  Developed an Emergency Management webpage on the County‘s website.  Attended trainings/webinars pertaining to emergency management.  Hosted quarterly Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) meetings.  Participated in Adult Peer Exchange (APEX) training pertaining to the LEPC.  Hosted bi-monthly Navajo County Citizen Corp Council (NCCCC) meetings. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Attend Arizona Division of Emergency Management‘s County Emergency Managers Meeting on a quarterly basis.  Review and update, if necessary, the emergency management webpage on a monthly basis.  Host quarterly LEPC meetings.  Complete preliminary National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP) Goal 2 interoperable radio data from cities and towns, excluding tribal jurisdictions.  Complete NECP Goal 2 event. (Dependent on prior bullet point and the State schedule.)  Host bi-monthly NCCCC meetings.  Review and updated (if necessary) NCCCC by-laws annually. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Key Emergency Operations Center (EOC) team members will attend trainings/webinars pertaining to emergency management.  Coordinate annual training exercise(s).  Complete the update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan by December 31, 2011. 74 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Develop a database for inventory of all plans in emergency management.  Identify plans/documents needing to be updated.  Obtain plans/documents in electronic format.  Update contact lists for emergency response on a quarterly basis.  Submit all grants reports (financial and activity) as required. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Review and develop a database for inventory of mutual aid agreements and expiration dates.  Obtain initial and/or updates of all mutual aid agreements with local jurisdictions, state, federal and tribes. GRANTS ADMINISTRATION MISSION STATEMENT Grants Administration is committed to identifying funding sources, providing sound grant development and management practices, and facilitating partnerships with County Departments, local governments and tribal jurisdictions to fiscally support projects and services that improve the quality of life for Navajo County citizens. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010 – 11  Submitted 18 grant applications.  Awarded 11 grant applications.  Awards totaled $574,382.00.  Attended 2 grant related trainings/webinars. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Submit financial and activity reports by deadline. (Deadlines vary depending on grant, i.e. monthly, quarterly, bi-monthly, bi-annually, annually.)  Submit 12 grant applications. Prepare at least 1 grant application per month for upcoming funding cycle.  Attend 3 grant related trainings/webinars. 75 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Development and coordination of Navajo County‘s Federal, State and local legislative agenda and lobbying efforts, while providing daily/weekly updates (verbal and written) to the Board of Supervisors, County Management and Department Directors regarding legislative issues.  Successful reduction of fiscal year 2011-12 fiscal impacts from the State of Arizona to Navajo County in the amount of $1.36 million. Successful reduction of statewide impacts to all counties from $150 million to $93 million through coordinated lobbying effort with the County Supervisors Association.  Implementation, development and maintenance of Navajo County Facebook page.  Implementation, development and maintenance of Navajo County Administration webpages and biography information.  Development and coordination of all Navajo County press releases and speaking points for elected officials and professional staff, while also providing timely responses to press requests for information.  Development and coordination of several of Navajo County‘s major economic development efforts, including Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) and REAL AZ. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Develop and promote Navajo County‘s Federal and State legislative agenda for upcoming session with the Board of Supervisors, County Management and Department Directors.  Monitor and research all legislative issues of interest to Navajo County Board of Supervisors, County Management and Department Directors.  Provide timely and accurate information (verbal and written) with State and Federal elected officials regarding impacts of legislative proposals on Navajo County‘s Mission.  Testify on legislative impacts to Navajo County.  Provide daily/weekly updates to (verbal and written) to the Board of Supervisors, County Management and Department Directors regarding legislative issues.  Develop strategic plan with elected officials, and professional staff, to improve coverage and dissemination of information to media outlets by improving relationships with media personnel and management, and assessing the media needs of elected officials and staff. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Engage citizens and local cities and towns, in addressing mutual challenges, and sharing anecdotes to expand the understanding of Navajo County services. 76 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 RISK MANAGEMENT MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County is committed to creating, maintaining and continuously improving a culture that reflects a commitment to protect people, property and the environment by preventing and controlling losses of human, physical and financial resources, achieving and maintaining compliance with applicable rules and regulations and ensuring efficient and appropriate insurance coverage and recovery of losses through the Arizona Counties Insurance Pool programs. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Risk Managements primary objectives are: preventing and controlling losses of human, physical and financial resources, while achieving and maintaining compliance with applicable rules and regulations. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Lowered Workers Compensation premium by 100k.  Continued decline in number of workers compensation injuries. For fiscal year 2009-10 we had 31 claims, this number was reduced in fiscal year 2010-11 to 29 claims.  Maintained an E-mod of less than one, reducing insurance costs.  Provided new detention cadet training for Arizona Counties Insurance Pool.  Continued to work with the OSHA working group to discuss and implement compliance issues.  Performed 15-18 on site mock OSHA inspections and corrected all exception items. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Use the CARVER system to analyze all potential risks and threats. Approximately four buildings per month estimated completion of December 31,2011.  Provide processing within 7-10 days for all completed internal or external claims.  Work with employees to assist in the education of best safety practices. Will provide two classes per month. Meetings will focus on updated safety training and engaging the employees in the safety process.  Continue to maintain a safe work place through daily observation of processes and environment.  Provide County wide training on a quarterly basis for hazmat, first aid and blood borne pathogens. 77 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 RISK MANAGEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue to lower the costs of insurance, and exposures to risk. premiums for workers comp and liability. Seek a 1% reduction to  Maintain an E-Mod of below one by maintaining workers comp claims at the fiscal year 2010-11 level.  Thoroughly investigate all claims through documentation, photos, on-site inspection and interviews.  Analyze all data for trends to be proactive in eliminating hazards/risk.  Protect county assets thus keeping public expenditures to a minimum.  Assess and correct any and all potential for risks, in the day to day operations through building inspections; 2 buildings per month. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens  Maintain a secure environment for those who frequent County buildings and grounds. Initial assessment to be completed by December 31, 2011.  Provide a measurable criticality of the public infrastructure. Initial assessment to be completed by December 31, 2011. 78 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT The Navajo County Board of Supervisors proudly serves their citizens with a three-fold commitment:  Exemplary service.  Retaining and recruiting a quality workforce.  Maintaining public safety. The Supervisors are committed to implementing sound public policy with integrity, reliability, honesty and fairness, all of which are delivered without discrimination. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Board takes a leadership role with other County departments and strongly encourages and models partnerships with governmental agencies and institutions, striving in a fiscally responsible manner to improve the quality of life through planned development and to increase prosperity by facilitating environmentally responsible commercial and industrial growth. The Department consists of five County Supervisors, the Clerk of the Board, and three support staff. Together they coordinate schedules and travel for each of the Supervisors, County Manager, Assistant County Manager and Governmental Affairs Director. This office maintains all official records of the County to include Contracts, Resolutions, Ordinances, Intergovernmental Agreements, Grants, Plans, Mutual Aid Agreements, Memorandum of Agreements, Memorandum of Understanding, Easements, and Leases. This office is responsible for the yearly back tax land auction and Board of Equalization Hearings. This office oversees the receiving and distribution of all County mailings. The Clerk of the Board is the appointed person to accept service on behalf of the Board of Supervisors and/or Navajo County and receives all Public Records Request. The Clerk of the Board is responsible for each Board of Supervisors meeting agenda and minutes to include all Special and Emergency meetings. This office accepts all sealed bids and assists in the bid opening process. This office schedules 7 different conference rooms throughout the County. The Board of Supervisors department is the primary point of contact for many of our citizens. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FY 2010-11  Monthly monitoring of the general fund budget through meetings with Administration and the Finance Department.  Responded in a timely manner to all Public Information Requests.  Monthly reconciliation of expenses and travel documentation.  Prepared and coordinated the request and approval of 12 liquor licenses for citizens.  Met all statutory requirements regarding publication of agendas and Board of Supervisor meeting minutes.  Continued improvement of mailroom security and procedures. Provided cross training in procedures to Recorders staff. Maintained a high level of security in the mailroom. 79 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FY 2010-11 continued  Continue to maintain original documents of all Contracts, Resolutions, Ordinances, Intergovernmental Agreements, Grants, Plans, Mutual Aid Agreements, Memorandum of Agreements, Memorandum of Understanding, Easements, and Leases.  Successful completion of the Board of Equalization Hearings in an accurate and timely manner.  Continue to maintain healthy relationships with all county elected officials, city/town officials, County Supervisors Association and officials from surrounding counties. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Review forms currently on the Navajo County website and add new forms as needed on a quarterly basis.  Maintain Records on the Navajo County website monthly.  Continue to post all Board of Supervisors meeting agendas and minutes on the Navajo County website bi-weekly.  Continue to provide a response to all emails and or phone messages within a 24 hour period.  Maintain one staff member at all times in the front office to maintain accountability to our citizens. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Purchasing card reconciliation to be completed timely and in accordance with the fiscal year 2011-2012 budget to reduce potential errors in expense accounting.  Provide training to staff on changes in the fiscal year 2011-2012 budget by July 31, 2011. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Meet with Arizona County Clerks Association bi-annually to review duties of Arizona Clerks and attend training for all Arizona Clerks. 80 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - ACCOUNTING FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT The finance department is committed to providing reliable services to our customers with professionalism in a timely manner. The primary mission is continuous improvement in the effectiveness and efficiency of maintaining the integrity, accuracy, and completeness of records . DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Areas of operation include payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, grant accounting, special districts, budget and finance/systems. The finance department is responsible for maintaining financial records in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in compliance with regulatory requirements. We assist with the annual audit and preparation of financial reports and financial statements. Accounts payable provides for timely and accurate processing of all payments to vendors, external, and internal customers. Payroll processes bi-weekly payroll for approximately 650 employees and prepares all state and federal reports. Budget calculates yearly assessments and balances special district funds. Budget is responsible for billing and collecting for improvement district debt services management. Budget and management analysis of levies and tax rates, bonds and annual reports. Assist fire districts with timelines and checklists for fire district budget preparation. Finance/Systems provides accurate financial information to the County Manager, Board of Supervisors, departments and taxpayers. Provides training for departments for financial management software. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Provided monthly budget performance reports to Department Directors and Elected Officials.  Provided weekly analysis of the General Fund revenues and expenditures for Administration. Monthly updates provided to the Board of Supervisors.  Provided Finance Executive Summary to Administration on a monthly basis.  Audited Financial Statements for fiscal years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 issued.  Issued a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 2009-10.  Developed budget planning guidelines for Elected Officials and Department Directors.  Developed Strategic Priorities for fiscal year 2011-12.  Created and customized SharePoint sites for the Assessor‘s Office.  Participated in the New World Advisory Groups for Financial Management and Human Resources.  Processed and distributed W-2‘s two weeks ahead of Internal Revenue Service deadline.  Rolled out Revenue Receipting to the departments.  Received the Distinguished Budget Award for fiscal year 2010-11. 81 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - ACCOUNTING FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Pay card implementation completed. Employees without a valid bank account receive their biweekly paycheck on a ‗pay card‘ that allows them to withdraw funds and use the card as a debit/ credit card. Live check processing has been reduced by 99%.  Reduced invoice turn around (from receipt of invoice to check date) from 10-14 days to 7-10 days.  Completed review of all child support deductions.  Reorganized filing system for payroll. Streamlined processing and filing for active payroll deductions.  Converted payroll adjustment form to Excel. Adjustment form is used by Human Resources and Finance to review payroll calculations and correct potential errors before transmitting the direct deposit.  Revised payroll procedure manual.  Two staff members attended Use Tax training. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service Research feasibility of online open enrollment. Implement document scanning solution to allow departments to view invoices in New World easily.  Implement utility bill document scanning on shared drive for departments to view monthly paid invoices. Implementation to be completed by July 1, 2011.   Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Provide monthly budget performance reports to Department Directors and Elected Officials.  Implement process for purchasing card processing through accounts payable.  Issue the county‘s fiscal year 2010-11 audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.  Begin development of Five Year Strategic Plan.  Begin research and planning of performance measures.  Revise procedure manuals for accounts payable, accounts receivable, and payroll. Initial draft shall be completed by June 2012.  Maximize the use of the p-card process to minimize accounts payable processing costs and further increase the rebate received. Departments with frequent small dollar purchases that can be easily combined for payment processing should be considered. Complete review of vendors/ departments by June 2012. 82 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Follow up with 2011 New World upgrades and record ideas for potential future changes to the system for Accounts Payable and Payroll. Software suggestions and ballots to be submitted by September 2011.  Revise invoice number schedule for a more uniformed input of Accounts Payable. Implement by July 1, 2011. Final draft of schedule by July 31, 2011.  Develop a checklist that will accommodate two payroll specialists with processing in the same pay period and ensure all payroll activities are complete. Checklist to be completed by August 31, 2011. Implementation to begin September 1, 2011.  Implementation of EFT‘s for major payroll and accounts p  ayable expenses.  Complete initial review of potential vendors by June 2012. Target 1-2% of vendors for initial testing and transmittals of payments.  Complete revenue collection training with Library District by July 31, 2011. 83 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - PURCHASING FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the purchasing department is to facilitate the procurement and delivery of goods and services for Navajo County at pricing and quality that meets or exceeds the end user‘s expectations. We continually strive to employ the most effective and innovative methods for procuring quality goods and services. Our responsibilities include providing Navajo County with policies that foster an ethical, responsive and efficient environment and recognizing the department‘s obligations to our suppliers and our internal customers. Navajo County purchasing department is committed to the highest standards of service and continuously strives for improvement in all these areas. We will engage best practices for governmental purchasing and receiving, partnering with other agencies and organizations to ensure that the supply chain at Navajo County is a world class operation and a model of efficiency. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County purchasing department is a sub-department of the finance department who reports to the Finance Director. The purchasing department is comprised of purchasing, shipping and receiving, asset management and an in-house print shop. Purchasing is responsible for the procurement of goods and services for all County departments and divisions in accordance with the Navajo County Procurement Code, Arizona Revised Statutes and Federal Law. Shipping and Receiving is responsible for ensuring packages are shipped in a timely manner and items received are recorded accurately in the financial system and delivered in a timely manner. Asset Management is responsible for ensuring all capital assets are accurately recorded, reported and managed through the life of the asset. The In-House Print Shop was established to provide costeffective, timely in-house printing and service capabilities to all county departments. The purchasing department also provides project management services for most major facility construction projects throughout the county. We strive to be accountable and responsive to Navajo County‘s internal customers, including:  Same day turnaround on simple purchase orders.  Two day turnaround on more complex purchase requests.  Delivery of items received within 24 hours of receipt of goods.  Arrange for pick up of larger items within 24 hours of receipt of goods.  Return customer/vendor calls within one working day of receipt.  Initiate problem resolution process within one working day of initial call.  Problem resolution within one week of initiative, whenever possible.  Successfully support and promote the most efficient and effective purchasing practices.  Provide timely and meaningful info on laws, rules, guidelines, and ongoing purchasing initiatives. 84 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - PURCHASING FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Revised purchasing policy - draft revision completed June 30, 2011.  Implementation of banking bid - completed by July 1, 2010.  Commissary invitation for bid completed.  Jail food services invitation for bid completed.  Redistricting request for purchase completed.  90% completion of physical asset inventory by June 30, 2011.  Processed 636 purchasing card transactions.  Purchasing card administration for all cardholders.  New card orders, problem resolution, password resets, fraud verification and resolution, card closures, monthly audit and reconciliation.  Processed 372 purchase orders.  Online auction direct payments processing completed.  Set up separate public fiduciary auction site.  Completion of South County Complex.  Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) energy improvement projects completed: Replace HVAC units juvenile detention facility, replace motors and install variable frequency drives on chiller motors, and lighting replacement program. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Roll out electronic requisition process to all departments – completion by December 2011.  Purchase order processing within 48 hours of receipt of electronic requisition with required documentation.  Shipping and receiving completed within 24 hours of receipt of goods.  In-house document reproduction:  Routine printing completed within 24 hours of receipt of order.  Special printing completed by established deadline. 85 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - PURCHASING FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Prepare bid documents and solicit quotes for best pricing:  Bond Counsel request for purchase.  Underwriting request for purchase.  Vehicles invitation for bid.  Courier invitation for bid.  Medical examiner invitation for bid.  Electronic payment processing invitation for bid.  100% review of excluded parties listing for all purchase orders and bids.  Monthly review of administration budget; meet or exceed expectations on cost savings and accurate expense coding for administration.  Quarterly review of open encumbrance report.  Prepare and submit reimbursement requests for the following emergencies:  Wallow Fire.  Willow Fire.  Wash Fire. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  NIGP membership participation - participate in Grand Canyon Chapter monthly meetings.  GFOA membership participation - attend webinar and regional training sessions as the budget will allow.  Board Member for Rim Country Senior Center.  Process all payroll, accounts payable and bank reconciliations. 86 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - SPECIAL DISTRICTS FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT Special districts is committed to providing reliable services to our customers with professionalism in a timely manner. The primary mission is continuously to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of maintaining accurate and comprehensive records, while providing significant budgetary customer service to all Navajo County special districts. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION It is a special district‘s responsibility to:  Calculate yearly assessments (principal & interest) based on bonds debt schedule and any early payoffs received within fiscal year; submit to the Navajo County Assessor‘s office.  Balance special district funds within the New World accounting system vs. Excel accounting spreadsheet records, financial records, debt schedules and property assessment listings.  Properly dissolve any special district that is no longer active according to Arizona Revised Statutes.  Provide assessment payoff quotes received by requested customers, such as mortgage companies and title companies in a timely and efficient manner. Properly record, track and submit early payoff payments.  Provide monthly detailed general ledger reports to requesting districts.  Submit payment for bond payments, accurately and in a timely and efficient manner.  Submit reports required by Arizona State Statutes, such as Arizona Department of Revenue Bonded Indebtedness Report and Special District‘s Annual Report.  Compile Special District‘s Annual Report for Little Colorado Flood Control District, Silver Creek Flood Control District, Navajo County Library District, Navajo County Flood Control District and Navajo County Public Health District.  Provide timelines and checklists for the fire district budget preparation.  Calculation of yearly levies, tax rates and FDAT (Fire District Assistance Tax).  Truth in Taxation (TNT) hearing and publication.  Other services include: special district accounting, budget, research, assist with development of newly organized special districts and bonds. 87 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - FINANCE - SPECIAL DISTRICTS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Performed all special district duties effectively and efficiently in order to provide exceptional customer service to district participants. This included:  Maintaining accurate records of each district on a continuous basis.  Providing assessment pay off amounts to property owners and title companies within 24 hours of request.  Reporting financial data to special districts monthly or as requested.  Paid Bond interest and principal payments on eleven bonds on time to avoid penalties.  Provided budget information to special districts in a timely manner. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12  Provide assessment pay off amounts to property owners and title companies within 24 hours of request. Complete procedure manual to ensure consistent and efficient handling of special district business by December 31, 2011.  Reconcile all special district funds and review all assessment documents to verify the accuracy of district records by December 31, 2011. 88 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - HUMAN RESOURCES FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT We are committed to delivering streamlined, innovative services through exceptional and seamless customer service to attract, empower, and retain a dynamic, diverse workforce. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The human resources team performs the following functions: Recruitment: Recruit knowledgeable, dedicated individuals that best fit the County‘s needs and provide them with a quality workplace environment in which they can realize their individual potential. Employee Records Management: Maintain employment records that are current, accurate and in compliance with federal, state and county statutes, rules, regulations. Employee Relations: Provide an effective program that includes consultation services to departments and employees in the management and resolution of employee issues. Build an ongoing relationship between employer and employee that can evolve with the service needs of the County. Administer and coordinate annual performance appraisal process. Classification and Pay: Administer and coordinate employee classification and pay plans taking into consideration internal and external equity as well as budgetary limitations/economics of the County. Provide a classification/pay program that is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Coordinate and maintain position control and employee tracking. Employee Development: Plan and coordinate training to enhance employees‘ knowledge, skills and abilities. Schedule requisite training for all staff such as employment laws and personnel policies. Employee Benefits: Provide comprehensive benefits programs and ensure proper administration and compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. Personnel Policies and Procedures: Develop, revise and implement policies ensuring compliance with federal and state laws, rules and regulations. Provide policy interpretation when needed for implementation and clarification. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Daily communication with internal and external customers and responding directly and diligently to customer needs in the areas of recruitment, employee records, classification and pay, employee relations and employee benefits.  Provided a pool of applicants for each position and hired staff that fit the county‘s culture and needs.  Compiled, prepared and posted up-to-date accurate listing of job vacancies on a weekly basis.  Conducted employee orientation for all new hires to include their role and responsibilities as a County employee.  Educated employees on maximizing their medical/dental benefits through out the fiscal year. 89 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - HUMAN RESOURCES FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Coordinated fiscal year 2010-11 benefits enrollment in May of 2010.  Scheduled and coordinated Mobile On-Site Mammography (MOM) screenings and flu shots.  Implemented Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) online enrollment for new hires.  Updated the Health Insurance and Benefits Policies and the Leave Without Pay Policies as they apply to health benefits. Also implemented an Outside Employment Policy which includes selfemployment or a second position (part-time) with the County.  Coordinated with IT to update HR info, policies and procedures, wellness and health benefits, and job vacancy announcements on external/internal websites. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Communicate daily with various internal and external customers and respond promptly and carefully to customer needs – respond to all requests within 24 hours.  Keep employees informed of HR related activities through the use of e-mails, internal website, the Communicator and various meetings. Communication will be ongoing and as needed throughout the year.  Process all incoming Personnel Action Forms within appropriate pay period and with 100% accuracy.  On a weekly basis process and forward all applications received to the hiring department.  On a weekly basis screen, scan and forward all applications received to the hiring department.  On-going – continue working with IT staff throughout fiscal year 2011-12 to improve the HR web page and/or update HR information.  Partner/coordinate with Finance and IT - determine the most efficient method of obtaining improved ID card/door access system, issue Request for Purchase, select vendor and implement by June 2012.  Maintain updated accurate job descriptions on the internal website.  Revise the Personnel Policies Manual as laws, rules, regulations, change.  Ensure that notice and training (if needed) is provided to all departments within two weeks of the policy change(s).  Throughout fiscal year 2011-12, continue to educate employees to changes in their medical/ dental benefits.  Coordinate open enrollment changes in May of 2012. Process open enrollment changes for the July 2012 implementation date. 90 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION - HUMAN RESOURCES FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  During fiscal year 2011-12, continue partnering efforts with Summit Regional Healthcare to increase access to Summit services. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Implement Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic & Clinical Health Act (HITECH) policies and procedures by June 2012.  Reconcile and balance monthly insurance invoices by the end of each month.  Make one time payroll adjustments within the appropriate pay period and with 100% accuracy for those employees changing health insurance coverage.  Update the County‘s Equal Employment Opportunity Plan on or before January 2, 2012.  On a weekly basis, compile, prepare and post an up-to-date accurate listing of job vacancies. Personnel Requisitions received by noon on Thursdays will be included on the following week‘s list.  Submit background and Motor Vehicle Department checks for processing within 24 hours of request.  E-verify – 100% completion within employee‘s first three working days.  Arizona New Hire Report – submit report of new hires within 20 days of hire with 100% accuracy to the State.  Conduct Employee Orientation within 3 days of hire date (except for Sheriff‘s Office)  By December 2011, establish standard format for personnel records, implement HIPAA folder and apply to all active employee files.  Ensure compliance with the Arizona State Library Retention Schedule as it relates to human resources information, files, records, etc. Review documents on a monthly basis. 91 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE) positions. Three of the 28.75 FTE's in the General Fund have been included in vacancy savings, pending changes in the economy. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Adm inistration/BOS* FY08 Budget General Fund* FY09 Budget FY10 Budget FY11 Budget FY12 Budget 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 28.75 Department of Corrections Contract 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 Emergency Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 Jail Fees Adm inistration/BOS Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 32.00 31.50 *FY 2010 - Administration and Board of Supervisors w ere combined into one department DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The decrease in General Fund expenditures is due to salary and employee related expenses that are associated with vacant positions. The increase in the Special Revenue budget is due to anticipated reimbursement of expenses associated with the Wallow Fire, the Willow Fire and the Wash Fire; the overall budget for this department increased by 67.51%, of that, the General Fund budget decreased by 1.62%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 33,054 Balance Forward Total Sources 2,203,646 2,536,883 $ 1,530,188 334,759 2,108,271 $ 6,748,919 1,638,509 3,374,613 2,495,809 -1.62% 5,035,732 229.09% 2,026,041 23.65% $ 2,571,459 $ 5,705,580 $ 12,231,803 $ 9,557,582 67.51% $ 2,020,402 $ 2,310,629 $ 2,016,179 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses $ Accounting Adjustments* $ Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 2,546,021 10.19% 50,727 83,500 59,412 668,004 700.00% 184,457 2,896,073 7,791,847 6,333,840 118.70% 573 415,378 338,324 9,717 -97.66% 67.51% 2,256,159 315,300 $ 5,705,580 $ $ - $ $ - $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 10,205,762 2,026,041 $ 9,557,582 $ - N/A $ - N/A 92 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ADMINISTRATION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW 93 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ASSESSOR FY 2011-12 County Assessor Chief Deputy County Assessor Lead/Training Appraiser (2) Data Input Specialist (5) Assessment Specialist (2) Drafter (2) Senior Appraiser (4) Appraiser (3) MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County Assessor‘s Office is dedicated to continually improving the assessment procedures and valuing all property in Navajo County fairly, impartially and equitably, within the parameters established by Arizona Revised Statutes and Arizona Department of Revenue. Our staff is dedicated to providing excellent customer service and efficiency, while serving the citizens of Navajo County. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION It is the responsibility of the Assessor to locate, identify and appraise at current market value, locally assessable property subject to ad valorem taxes and to process exemptions specified by law. The Assessor has no jurisdiction or responsibility for area budgets, tax rates, or amounts of taxes paid. These matters are handled by the various agencies performing the services supported by the property taxes, such as the county governments, city governments, school districts and other taxing districts. The Assessor‘s Office consists of the following sub-departments:  Administration: Two staff members work on budget and personnel issues and oversee the daily operation of the Assessor‘s Office.  Appraisal: The Appraisal Section of the assessor‘s office is responsible for locating and listing all properties subject to Ad-valorem property taxes. This section is comprised of eight staff members, who are responsible for land and improved parcel appraisals. 94 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ASSESSOR FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION continued  Drafting: The drafting department consists of two staff members who maintain the Assessor‘s maps according to the recorded deeds, subdivision plat maps and combination request forms. They determine and assign new parcel numbers for the splits, subdivisions and combinations. They update Assessor‘s maps to reflect newly formed special districts and annexations to existing taxing districts (i.e. city, town, road, water, or sewer district boundaries). This function also requires issuing and/or changing area codes so that all parcels within a district are defined.  Personal Property: The personal property is divided into two sections: mobile homes and business personal property. The mobile home section which consists of two employees is responsible for locating and assessing mobile homes located within the county boundaries. This is accomplished in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Transportation, Recorder, Treasurer and Sheriff‘s Office. The business personal property section has one employee assigned to process business renditions which are filed by commercial entities located within the county boundaries. The rendition is the value of current assets used in the daily operation of the business. This process is completed annually.  Title Department: There are currently three employees that are responsible for the processing of all recorded title changes to property, as well as processing exemptions and address changes.  Analyst Section: There are two employees who confirm and validate Affidavits of Property Value which are recorded at the time property transactions are recorded. Data integrity is reviewed to ensure the valuations are fair and equitable. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Maintained quality of services to the public by either immediately responding to public inquiries or, with those that require research, striving to respond on the same day  The Assessor conducted presentations to over 35 organizations to enhance public awareness of the valuation process as it relates to taxing.  Staff personally met with over 250 seniors, widows, widowers or disabled property owners at their local senior centers to facilitate their application for senior property valuation freeze or property tax exemptions.  Achieved fiscal responsibility through maintaining a balanced department budget during a time of dramatically reduced budgets.  Employees continued education in their area of expertise:   All employees participated in departmental educational workshops  Four personal property staff participated in Department of Revenue workshops  One employee became certified as an appraiser through the Department of Revenue. All employees participated in a data clean-up project to assure integrity of property information, real and personal, from computer conversion. 95 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ASSESSOR FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Developed a procedure manual for the deed transfer department.  The mapping department exceeded its 2010-11 goal to identify and assign parcel numbers to 25% of the state and federal land within the county by 100% completion of this project.  The appraisers addressed taxpayer‘s field inspection request within three weeks of the request. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Continue employee education related to Assessor’s office responsibility as well as customer service training to better provide solutions to issues raised by the public.  The Navajo County Assessor’s office website will be revised to include zoning information linked to parcels.  Web-site generated comments from the public as well as Assessor meeting requests by organizations will be monitored daily to provide immediate responses to the inquiries.  Monitor information available via the county website to assure it is accurate and when discrepancies are found, collaborate with department staff and as needed the County Information Technology Department to immediately resolve any issues  Conduct training for staff to improve services in the annual community outreach programs. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  The Assessor will coordinate interdepartmental partnerships in the effort to utilize all resources available to minimize expenditures for all participating departments‘ budgets. The Assessor will employ sound fiscal principles to ensure the Assessor‘s fiscal year 2011-12 expenditures remain less than those of the 2009 budget.  The Navajo County appraisal team continually monitors the property market to assure valuations are fair and equitable. Additionally, they will participate in Assessor‘s office and Board of Equalization valuation appeals, presenting market information and factors that impacted their recommendation for the valuation of the appealed property. This team is made up of one business personal property appraiser, two land appraisers and five real property appraisers. Their specific fiscal year 2011-12 goals include:   Business Personal Property Appraiser: audit six mobile home parks.  Land Appraisers: revalue 25% of parcels. Real Property appraisers canvass 20% of parcels. 96 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ASSESSOR FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Due to the reduction of valuations of many properties in the southern part of the county there is a need to educate the public on the relationship between these valuations and their tax bill. The Assessor will continue contact with entities that conduct public meetings and will make a presentation to 100% of the entities that request such. The Assessor‘s power point presentation regarding valuations as well as a ―Request for Meeting‖ form is available on the county web site.  The Assessor is the county representative to the Arizona Association of Counties and will also continue her participation in the Assessors’ organization to assure she is well educated on pending legislation. She will participate in meetings, webinars and/or conference calls as needed to provide information to legislators and lobbyists as well as members of the public on the impact of pending legislation to the local property owner and to county operations.  The Navajo County Manager conducts regularly scheduled meetings to address issues that impact the county. The anticipated main area of focus during fiscal year 2011-12 will be budget reductions due to the economic downturn and state budget shifts. The Assessor will attend these meetings and work in partnership with the county team to meet the county mission statement to provide the best customer service in a fiscally responsible manner. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). However, two positions are included in vacancy savings pending changes in the economy. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Assessor FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 23.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 Assessor Total 23.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 97 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y ASSESSOR FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The increase in General Fund expenditures is due strictly to increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The 2012 special revenue budget increased by 82% and the expenditure budget increased by 4.23% due to a legislatively mandated special project (Affidavit of Residency) . That project deadline has been deferred. Therefore, $100,000 was budgeted in the revenue and expenditure budget but will not be received or spent in this budget year. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 1,192,839 Special Revenue $ 1,279,006 96,033 Balance Forw ard 80,318 Total Sources $ 1,185,118 75,000 $ 80,376 82,720 64,877 1,317,460 3.01% 136,500 82.00% 43,521 -47.39% $ 1,369,190 $ 1,436,726 $ 1,330,371 $ 1,497,481 4.23% $ 974,938 $ 1,021,878 $ 965,795 $ Uses Personal Services 1,040,240 1.80% 20,322 28,400 17,151 73,000 157.04% 279,957 376,448 298,526 374,775 -0.44% 9,977 10,000 5,378 9,466 -5.34% 4.23% Supplies Prof essional Services Capital Outlay $ Total Uses 1,285,194 $ 1,436,726 Accounting Adjustments* $ (5,100) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 78,896 $ - $ 1,286,850 $ 43,521 $ 1,497,481 $ - N/A $ - N/A * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. General Fund Expenditures $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $954,206 $1,060,332 $965,795 $1,040,240 Supplies 12,298 23,400 14,025 22,000 Professional Services 208,155 233,728 205,298 245,754 - - - 9,466 $1,174,658 $1,317,460 $1,185,118 $1,317,460 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 98 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY ATTORNEY FY 2011-12 County Attorney Executive Secretary Community Services Division Community Services Director Criminal Division (Victim Services Manager) Victims Advocate Bad Check Program Manager Senior Legal Secretary (6) Victims Advocate IAC Coordinator PT Office Support Specialist Chief Criminal Deputy Attorney IV Supervising Legal Secretary Civil Division Attorney IV Investigation Division Special Investigator Child Support Child Support Manager Attorney III (7) Attorney II(UFIII) Legal Secretary (3) Attorney II (3) Attorney I (UF III) Child Support Case Manager Office Support Specialist (2) Attorney I Attorney (Temp) Child Support Specialist (7) Senior Legal Secretary (RM) Attorney III Child Support Enforcement Ofcr Child Support Case Manager Susan Clark Child Support Specialist Jose Lerma Office Support Specialist MISSION STATEMENT The Office of the Navajo County Attorney is dedicated to:  Providing fair and vigorous prosecution under the law while supporting victims and witnesses;  Working to prevent crime;  Assisting partners in ways that help us become more effective; and  Communicating our role and the steps we take to be effective to the public. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County Attorney‘s Office (NCAO) is a constitutionally created office and the County Attorney is an elected official. The NCAO represents Navajo County, its Board of Supervisors and elected officials, and other county departments and agencies in administrative and legal matters. The criminal division of the office prosecutes all felony crimes and most misdemeanors committed in Navajo County. The NCAO also provides victim-witness assistance, child support enforcement and adoption services. 99 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY ATTORNEY FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 The accomplishments of the Navajo County Attorney‘s Office during FY 2010-11 are exemplified by the selection of County Attorney Brad Carlyon as ―2011 County Attorney of the Year‖ by WeTip, a nonprofit crime-fighting organization that is the nation‘s leading operator of anonymous crime-tip hotlines. The award was presented in April at WeTip‘s 38 th annual National Crime-Fighting Conference in Ontario, California. The presentation was made by WeTip Chief Executive Officer Sue Aguilar, who lauded Carlyon as ―an inspiration to other community leaders‖ and emphasized his office‘s numerous community-oriented accomplishments such as the following during FY 2010-11:  Spearheading a successful effort on the part of federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies to have Navajo County designated as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) by the President‘s Office of National Drug Control Policy, bringing new federal resources and funding to assist law enforcement in the war against drug trafficking and abuse. Navajo County was the first county in more than ten years to receive the HIDTA designation.  Establishing the Navajo County Domestic Violence Court, an intensive diversion program for first -time domestic violence offenders similar to the highly successful Drug Court that the County Attorney helped establish several years ago. The program has been successful in nipping domestic violence in the bud and preventing it from becoming a repetitive cycle that destroys families and relationships.  Helping to create the Ruth McCloskey Memorial Scholarship in partnership with the Northland Pioneer College Foundation to assist Drug Court participants in obtaining a higher education. The scholarship honors prosecutor Ruth McCloskey, who passed away in 2011.  ·  Raising money for the FAC by sponsoring the 2 nd Annual Car Show and Arts and Crafts Festival in Show Low on Memorial Day weekend and by actively seeking donations of money and equipment from local businesses throughout the year.  Creating a multi-disciplinary Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team to review all deaths directly or indirectly related to domestic violence with an eye toward preventing them in the future.  Hosting the second annual Victims‘ Rights Symposium to bring together nationally known experts in the field of crime victims‘ rights, local providers of victims‘ services, and professionals and citizens with an interest in victims‘ rights. This year‘s symposium in Holbrook attracted more than 200 attendees.  Assisting in the creation of a Restitution Court to help ensure that crime victims are compensated for their losses. Taking the lead in establishing Family Advocacy Centers (FAC) in Show Low and Holbrook. The FAC provide a convenient, non-threatening environment where victims of child abuse and neglect and adult sexual assault and their families can meet with medical examiners, mental health specialists, victim advocates, representatives of state agencies, law enforcement representatives and prosecutors. 100 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY ATTORNEY FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  In partnership with the Navajo County Drug Project, holding a series of meetings in the White Mountain communities for churches, other faith-based groups and community leaders and organizations to brainstorm ways to become more involved in the fight against substance abuse. The meetings focused on creative alternatives to the traditional ―prosecution model‖ of battling substance abuse.  Holding similar community meetings in Holbrook and Winslow to explore creative ways for these communities and their leaders and residents to address the problem of public intoxication.  Presenting ―Identity Theft‖ seminars to senior citizen groups and community organizations throughout the county.  Initiating Arizona Senate Bill 1243, which was signed into law and which significantly increases the funding for the Bad Check Programs in all County Attorneys‘ Offices statewide.  Collecting over $50,000 in bad checks for Navajo County merchants and residents without court involvement.  Creating a year-round program of public service announcements about the Bad Check Program to discourage the writing of bad checks and inform merchants and the public about the County Attorney‘s free services.  Creating a program of ―Don‘t Drink and Drive‖ Public Service Announcements that are aired during the holidays, high school graduation and other high-risk periods.  Assisting law enforcement in planning and conducting a successful Child Support Roundup of deadbeat parents who failed to pay their court-ordered child support and had warrants issued for their arrest. Arrests were made in Holbrook, Show Low and Winslow.  Designating a special ―zoning prosecutor‖ to criminally prosecute violators of the county‘s zoning, building and health codes who have not cooperated with the county‘s civil enforcement efforts.  Providing asset-forfeiture training to local law enforcement agencies to maximize their effectiveness in tapping into this important source of crime-fighting funds. (Asset forfeiture refers to the seizure of money and property used in the commission of crimes.)  Partnering with Sheriff K. C. Clark and the Navajo County Library District to create the ―Books for Youth Program‖ so that law enforcement officers throughout the county will have a comforting backpack of books to give to confused and frightened children at the scene of an accident, crime or other emergency.  Sponsoring the 1st Annual Veterans‘ Parade in Show Low on Memorial Day to honor our veterans and generate funds for the Disabled American Veterans. Three Navajo Code Talkers served as the Grand Marshalls of this well-attended event. 101 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY ATTORNEY FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Aggressively pursue all available state and federal grant and funding opportunities, providing monthly reports on progress.  Review monthly budget reports submitted by finance. Monthly reconciliation and submittal of journal entries to finance for all special revenue funds. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Continue partnering with Sheriff Clark to pursue BIA cross-certification for all Navajo County Sheriff Deputies. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). There has however been changes in FTE's between funds due to both increases and decreases in state and federal grants. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source County Attorney FY 08 Budget General Fund FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 25.10 25.00 25.00 24.51 23.22 Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Byrne Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 2.00 Anti-Gang Prosecution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arizona Domestic Violence Resource Prosecutor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Bad Check Program 2.00 1.31 1.00 0.50 0.50 Byrne Grant - Drug Enforcement 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Child Abuse 0.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Child Support 13.00 11.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 Community Gun Violence 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Criminal Justice Enhancement 3.00 3.00 3.50 3.50 2.00 Department of Public Safety Victims of Crime Act (DPS VOCA) 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 1.23 Family Advocacy 0.00 0.00 3.75 0.00 0.00 Fill the Gap - Local 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 Justice Assistance Grant Local Solicitation 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Justice for the Peace Ordinance 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 Juvenile Accountability Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Local Law Enforcement Byrne Grant 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misdemeanor Intergovernmental Agreement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.86 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations - Anti - Racketeering 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Rural Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Southw est Border 0.00 2.00 1.93 1.93 1.00 Victim Assistance 0.50 1.00 0.76 0.76 0.69 Victim's Rights 2.00 2.50 1.20 1.20 1.20 54.10 52.81 61.00 73.26 71.70 County Attorney Total 102 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY ATTORNEY FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The decrease in the Special Revenue budget is due to grant funding that is no longer available or reductions to funding levels of existing grants. The overall budget for this department decreased by 16.57%. The General Fund budget remains flat with no significant increases/decreases from fiscal year 2010-11. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 2,065,191 Special Revenue $ 2,136,123 1,808,430 Balance Forw ard 1,629,689 Total Sources $ 5,285,369 2,189,274 $ 2,272,122 1,469,757 860,234 2,136,123 0.00% 4,031,566 -23.72% 1,249,987 -14.95% $ 5,503,310 $ 8,891,249 $ 5,321,630 $ 7,417,676 -16.57% $ 3,441,783 $ 5,537,484 $ 3,253,763 $ Uses Personal Services 5,023,450 -9.28% 59,690 110,750 63,527 95,860 -13.44% Professional Services 462,923 2,279,987 567,225 2,071,574 -9.14% Capital Outlay 103,451 963,028 187,128 226,792 -76.45% -16.57% Supplies $ 4,067,848 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 109,302 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 1,544,764 $ - Total Uses 8,891,249 $ $ 4,071,643 1,249,987 $ 7,417,676 $ - N/A $ - N/A * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. General Fund Expenditures $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $1,927,599 $2,042,019 $1,953,215 $1,985,122 Supplies 27,248 23,709 39,307 32,491 Professional Services 106,906 70,395 183,520 114,510 3,438 - 13,232 4,000 $2,065,191 $2,136,123 $2,189,274 $2,136,123 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 103 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CONSTABLES FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY CITIZENS Holbrook Constable Precinct 1 Winslow Constable Precinct 2 Kayenta Constable Precinct 4 Show Low Constable Precinct 5 Pinetop Constable Precinct 6 Snowflake Constable Precinct 3 MISSION STATEMENT Constables execute judicial process; enforce court orders; and attend the justice courts as mandated by law. Constables perform their statutory duties in a manner which promotes the efficient and fair administration of justice. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Constables are elected peace officers who execute civil and criminal process for the justice courts, superior courts, the county attorney, the attorney general, and the political subdivisions of the state. There are six constables in Navajo County. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  All constables expended less than the budgeted amount.  100% participation in the 48-hour newly-elected Constable Orientation program in Santa Cruz County.  Three constables completed AzPost basic firearms training in Maricopa County and are now firearms qualified.  Five constables completed all annual training requirements.  Executed 22 arrest warrants to enforce collection of $13,200 in delinquent fines. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  Will serve all court process in a timely manner and at a success rate of better than 90%.  Will serve critical court process (e.g. Order of Protection, Injunctions Against Harassment, and Eviction actions) within 24 hours. 104 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CONSTABLES FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Will maintain radio contact with Sheriff‘s Office dispatcher during emergencies.  Three constables will attend the 50-hour AzPOST firearms academy.  Will assist the Sheriff and emergency services during county disasters. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Will diligently pursue defendants to ensure their appearance at required court hearings thereby maximizing the efforts of the judge, court clerk, prosecutors and public defenders.  Will consolidate travel to reduce mileage expenses by 10%.  Will share resources among precincts.  Will offer additional services to law offices and Superior Court litigants to enhance revenue. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Will be involved in state association leadership opportunities.  Will be active participants in Arizona Association of Counties opportunities.  Will coordinate with neighboring counties and tribes to improve efficiency. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Constables FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Constables Total 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 105 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CONSTABLES FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The overall budget for this department remained flat from 2011. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 210,081 Special Revenue $ 290,013 - Balance Forw ard - Total Sources $ - 238,519 $ 290,013 - - - - - 0.00% N/A N/A $ 210,081 $ 290,013 $ 238,519 $ 290,013 0.00% $ 188,002 $ 268,773 $ 221,386 $ Uses Personal Services 269,390 0.23% 1,479 1,700 2,176 2,071 21.82% 20,600 19,540 14,957 18,552 -5.06% - - - - N/A 0.00% Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay $ Total Uses Fund Balance as of 6/30 210,081 $ $ - 290,013 $ $ - $ 238,519 $ - 290,013 $ - General Fund Expenditures $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- Personal Services 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $188,002 $268,773 $221,386 $269,390 Supplies 1,479 1,700 2,176 2,071 Professional Services 20,600 19,540 14,957 18,552 - - - - $210,081 $290,013 $238,519 $290,013 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures N/A 106 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager Facilities Management Director Secretary Facilities Maintenance. & Constr Asst Dir Facilities Constr Foreman Facilities Maint Foreman Groundskeeping Foreman Facilities Maintenance & Constr Technician HVAC Technician Lead Custodian Custodian (5) Facilities Maintenance Worker Facilities Maintenance & Constr Technician Facilities Maintenance & Constr Tech Facilities Maintenance & Constr Technician Facilities Maintenance & Constr Technician Facilities Maintenance & Constr Tech Utility Worker Facilities Maintenance & Constr Technician Maintenance & Constr Technician MISSION STATEMENT The Facilities Management Department provides efficient, safe and fiscally responsible facilities and services to its citizens and employees. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The mission of the Facilities Management Department is to provide exceptional facility solutions to all customers, every time, utilizing efficient and innovative methods to ensure fiscal prudency. 107 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Provided craft cross training to all maintenance, construction technicians.  Successfully completed 1070 maintenance work orders in an efficient manner.  Successfully completed 1172 maintenance work orders for the Jail in an efficient manner.  Renovation of 9th Place Property in Show Low.  902 East Deuces of Clubs (Public Works).  904 East Deuces of Clubs (Probation).  Provide 24/7 maintenance coverage for the jail and juvenile facility, i.e., electrical, plumbing, welding, concrete and block work, carpentry and HVAC repairs.  Provide maintenance coverage for jail kitchen on a 24/7 basis.  Provide custodial services for all county buildings and grounds from Kayenta to Whiteriver and all county buildings in between.  Provide maintenance coverage on a 24/7 basis for the Board of Supervisors, Elected Officials and Department Directors.  Facilities Management completed 1172 maintenance work orders for jail.  Facilities Management completed 1070 maintenance work orders for county buildings and facilities.  Installed security bars in windows, repaired electrical short and renovated Kayenta library.  Ongoing energy conservation program, replaced HVAC units for juvenile facility with more efficient units. Installed variable speed drives on all air handlers for main complex.  Energy conservation, replaced 2025 bulbs with energy efficient bulbs and changed out 2000 T12 ballast to the energy efficient T-8 ballast.  Completed the renovation to two more classrooms at the McNeil Complex to accommodate office space for public and legal defenders.  Built a car wash for the Holbrook Auto Shop.  Installed a 9,000 pound lift for vehicle repairs within our facilities management building in Holbrook.  Pinetop installed a stainless steel sink and toilet combo pack for Sheriff‘s substation.  Rebuilt domestic hot water boiler #2. 108 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Rebuilt boiler for HVAC heating system for main complex.  Erected ―Dog Run‖ for the jail recreation yard for the jail.  Partnered with the finance department in the development for common codes to track/pay utility bills  Repaired the roof for the McNeil facility in Show Low.  Continued landscaping improvements to the main complex in Holbrook.  Built seven new dog kennels for county use at the Holbrook Dog Pound on February 10, 2011.  Installed bus stop at Holbrook complex on February 18, 2011.  Repaired multiple roof leaks to Holbrook fiduciary building on April 29, 2011.  Installed larger HVAC unit for the Winslow server room on March 20, 2011.  Completed renovations to Kayenta library on May 27, 2011.  Completed rebuilding boilers for domestic hot water #1 and HVAC boiler #1 on June 30, 2011. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Continue to provide maintenance coverage for our Jail and Juvenile Facility on a 24/7 basis.  Paint exterior walls of the Fiduciary, Elections and Facilities Management buildings to match the color of the new Jail.  Erect large building for Fairgrounds by October 28, 2011.  Erect metal storage facilities for Facilities Management in Holbrook by November 30, 2011.  Purchase and install new 1200 amp switch gear for Fairgrounds for electrical upgrade.  Upgrade arena lights at the Fairgrounds as part of energy conservation program. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue our energy conservation efforts for lighting and HVAC reduction throughout all County Buildings. 109 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE) positions. Increases in Public Health District and Public Works are attributed to positions reassigned from Public Works. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Facilities Managem ent FY 08 Budget General Fund FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 21.00 20.00 18.00 17.25 17.00 Emergency Management 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 Federal Detention Contract 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 Public Health District 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 Phone & Commissary 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 Public Works Facilities Managem ent Total 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 23.00 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The decrease in General Fund expenditures is due to the reclassifying of positions and reorganization within the department. The overall General Fund budget for this department decreased by 2.40%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ - Balance Forw ard Total Sources 1,709,630 2,008,406 $ 1,607,065 $ 1,960,225 - - -2.40% N/A - - - N/A $ 1,709,630 $ 2,008,406 $ 1,607,065 $ 1,960,225 -2.40% $ 911,053 $ 958,792 $ 875,957 $ 910,455 -5.04% Uses Personal Services Supplies 197,111 176,450 164,595 176,450 0.00% Professional Services 601,467 873,164 566,232 873,320 0.02% Capital Outlay Total Uses Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ $ 1,709,630 - $ $ 2,008,406 - 281 $ $ 1,607,065 - $ $ 1,960,225 - N/A -2.40% N/A 110 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW General Fund Expenditures $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget Personal Services $911,053 $958,792 $875,957 $910,455 Supplies 197,111 176,450 164,595 176,450 Professional Services 601,467 873,164 566,232 873,320 - - 281 - $1,709,630 $2,008,406 $1,607,065 $1,960,225 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 111 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT The Information Technology Department will provide the highest quality technology-based services, in the most cost-effective manner, to facilitate the Navajo County mission, strategic priorities and highest quality customer service. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The information technology department consists of 10 dedicated employees and currently has 1 vacant positions. Together we provide support for computer based hardware and software systems, various communication systems, internal and external web services and custom programming services where commercial solutions are not available. We strive to:  Promote and facilitate the effective integration of technology into the basic mission of the County through planning, programming, training, consulting, and other support activities.  Develop, enhance and manage the county‘s enterprise networks to provide high speed, transparent and highly functional connectivity among all information resources.  Develop and maintain highly effective, reliable, secure and innovative information systems to support administrative and research functions. 112 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION continued  Facilitate the collection, storage, security and integrity of electronic data while ensuring appropriate access.  Promote new uses of information technology within the organization through the support for exploratory and innovative applications.  Provide leadership for effective strategic and tactical planning in the use of technology.  Provide fast and reliable access to all information systems. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Continue working with the departments to develop sections on the county web site that don‘t currently have a presence (i.e. Public Defender and Courts) thereby improving customer service to the public.  Employee Online Time Entry — Online data entry timesheet that also provides auto archiving functionality for audit purposes. Implemented with administration and information technology.  Worked with finance to meet the schedule for completion of audits, as outlined by the Auditor General.  As recommended by the Auditor General‘s Office: Created backup data center in South County Complex; upgraded long haul wireless network connections between the Holbrook Complex and South County Complex allowing backups to be accomplished remotely on a nightly basis. Began virtualization of computer based network services for disaster recover purposes.  Continued to enhance web-based services for the public; improved forms, user-friendly web pages, improved browser support (preemptive testing for emerging technologies). Completely redesigned public website, capable of running in all modern browsers including mobile devices. www.navajocountyaz.gov GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  Open Enrollment using the Employee Portal and provide training for staff on implementation.  Continue to enhance web-based services for the public; improved forms, user-friendly web pages, improved browser support (preemptive testing for emerging technologies). Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Replace disparate communication systems with MS Lync Server 2010 which will promote effective communication at all levels of the county organization and for the public. Increase effectiveness of communication for public safety and emergency management.  Complete the radio communication link with DPS – so law enforcement can communicate across agency boundaries. 113 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Complete Mototurbo rollout county-wide and finish narrowband compliance. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Fully implement the virtualization of computer based network services for disaster recover purposes. Testing of backup site using production applications from disaster recovery location.  Work with finance to implement government reporting in New World Systems.  Migrate domain to new directory structure and implement new security certificates. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW The increase of one Full Time Equivalent (FTE) is attributed to the transfer of positions from the Sheriff's Office and Jail. Two of the 11.00 FTE's budgeted have been included in vacancy savings pending changes in the economy. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Inform ation Technology FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 Federal Detention Contract 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Health District 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Library District 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 Treasurer's Tax System 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.00 Inform ation Technology Total 8.00 8.00 9.50 10.00 11.00 114 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There is a significant increase in the General Fund budget due to positions being moved from the Sheriff's Office to IT. Special Revenue budget has had an overall decrease. The special revenue funds are generating the same level of revenues, but the funds are now incurring operating costs. The overall budget for this department decreased by 13.25%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue 559,286 $ 775,917 319,172 Balance Forw ard (1,462) Total Sources $ 565,742 $ 860,917 10.95% 308,020 327,410 287,502 -6.66% 81,321 77,858 171,187 110.51% 13.25% $ 876,996 $ 1,165,258 $ 971,010 $ 1,319,606 $ 559,925 $ 663,863 $ 504,296 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Prof essional Services Capital Outlay 697,553 5.07% 15,168 60,500 30,284 70,000 15.70% 235,560 439,895 264,775 542,053 23.22% 447 1,000 468 10,000 N/A 13.25% $ 811,100 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 15,027 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 80,924 $ - Total Uses 1,165,258 $ $ 799,823 171,187 $ 1,319,606 $ - N/A $ - N/A * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. General Fund Expenditures $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $459,950 $562,705 $433,654 $614,267 Supplies 15,168 60,500 30,284 70,000 Professional Services 83,721 151,712 101,336 176,650 447 1,000 468 $559,286 $775,917 $565,742 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures $860,917 115 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the judicial branch in Navajo County is to provide our constituents with a judicial forum for the just and timely resolution of disputes. Ease of access for users to court-related information and processes is an inherent obligation. Our responsibility as court system personnel is to fulfill the public‘s right to fair and efficient justice with dignity, professionalism and courtesy. We are dedicated to serving all whom use our facilities in a professional and courteous manner, while providing the best service possible. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The judicial branch consists of four Superior Court divisions, the Clerk of the Superior Court, six Justice of the Peace Courts, Adult Probation, Juvenile Probation and Juvenile Detention. The Superior Court handles matters including civil, criminal, mental health, probate, family court matters which include divorce, paternity, child support and parenting time, juvenile matters which include delinquency, dependency, adoption and severance cases, and limited jurisdiction court appeals. The Clerk of the Court is the official record keeper and fiduciary agent for the Superior Court. Among the Clerk of the Court responsibilities are to: provide public access to the records of the Superior Court in Navajo County; attend each Superior Court proceeding to record the actions of the court and prepare minute entries for distribution to appropriate parties; receive filings for initiating Superior Court actions in civil, criminal, mental health, probate, family court matters, juvenile matters, which include delinquency, dependency, adoption and severance cases, and limited jurisdiction court appeals; ensure accurate and safe handling of court-ordered fees, fines, and victim restitution, including disbursement of these funds; provide various family support services to the public; receive distribute, and preserve office court documents; store and safeguard exhibits and evidence for all court cases; issue and record marriage licenses; process applications for private process servers, bail bondsmen, and passports; compile and maintain statistics of cases and other business of the court; act as Jury Commissioner qualifying, maintaining and providing jurors for court trials. The Justice Courts handle matters such as civil lawsuits where the amount in dispute is $10,000 or less, landlord and tenant controversies, small claims cases, criminal matters and the full range of civil and criminal traffic offenses, including DUIs. Justices of the Peace also resolve other types of misdemeanor allegations (e.g. shoplifting, writing bad checks, domestic violence violations) and, like other trial judges, handle requests for orders of protection and injunctions against harassment. The Adult and Juvenile Probation departments help to enhance the safety and well being of our communities. They accomplish this through working in partnerships with the community to provide research based prevention and intervention services; assess offenders‘ risks/needs in order to help guide Court decisions and to apply the appropriate level of services; manage offender risk by enforcing court orders, and expecting law-abiding behavior and personal accountability. 116 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION continued Juvenile Detention staff provides a safe and secure living place for juveniles who must be detained to help maintain the safety of the community. Education services are provided to the juvenile detainees through the HOPE School, which is a nationally accredited school. The HOPE School is operated in conjunction with the Navajo County Superior Court and the Navajo County Superintendent of Schools. Counseling sessions are provided to give detained juveniles the tools they need to become good citizens upon their release from detention. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Superior Court services continue to be expanded in the southern portion of Navajo County providing improved access to court proceedings. The Superior Court conducts court hearings, and other services such as mediation, on matters which involve parties from the areas in the Southern portion of the County, limiting travel time and expense for these citizens. Expanding Clerk of the Court services in the future is included in our long term plan.  Continued use of interactive audio visual technology in the courts to conduct court proceedings continues to improve the efficiency in how initial appearances, arraignments, and other permissible hearings are done. This practice improves public safety by avoiding having to remove the defendant from the secured area of the jail into public population, and reduces the costs of transporting defendants to court.  Cost saving efforts continues to be a high priority. Local training opportunities are provided to Court employees. This training is conducted by the Court‗s Field Trainer and other individuals which provide training on issues specific to the court. In addition to on-site training, staff is also able to attend webinars and other e-training.  The CASA Program of Navajo County matches adult volunteers with dependent children so the court can hear an independent, volunteer voice who speaks solely for the best interests of a child in a dependency case. Volunteers go through an extensive background check and a 40 hour training program before being assigned to a case.  The Navajo County Drug Court continues to offer individualized support for drug and alcohol addiction through the use of counseling, monitoring and incentives. The Drug Court team which is made up of Judges, Prosecutors, Defense Counsel, Probation Officers and Counselors play a vital role in the success of the participants. During the first three quarters of fiscal year 2010-11 there have been 10 graduates from the Drug Court Program.  All of the Courts continue to participate in the FARE (Fines, Fees and Restitution Enforcement) program. This program assists the Courts in upholding the rule of the law by requiring that court orders be enforced and that defendants pay the fines, fees, and restitution they owe, but have avoided paying. In addition to other collection efforts, in 2010 the courts in Navajo County received close to $1,000,000 through the FARE program. 117 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  The Clerk of Superior Court‗s Office digitalized over 100,000 documents from old docket books. The digitalization of these documents will provide both the employees of the clerk‘s office, judicial staff and the public with simple accessibility for quicker viewing and printing of requested documents.  Per Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2009-43, the Clerk of the Court‗s Office is emailing orders, notices, minute letters and other documents. The e-mailed documents take the place of paper documents that were previously delivered by U.S. mail which greatly reduces postage expenses.  Per A.R.S. §12-283J the Clerk of the Superior Court electronically publishes all superior court criminal case minute entries which are viewable by any interested individual. The adult probation department received training and introduced Evidenced Based Practices (EBP). EBP is a decision-making process which integrates the best available research, clinician expertise, and client characteristics. The intent of EBP is to obtain the correct information in which to impose an effective sentence that supports the necessary treatment programs and promotes offender change which ultimately reduces recidivism.  On December 1, 2010 the Navajo County adult probation department was authorized by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona to be governed under Evidence Based Practices (EBP) (Administrative Directive 210-32). Under this directive the department implemented various new policies and procedures aimed to reduce offender risk and the likelihood of future criminal behavior. The EBP format requires probation officers to utilize graduated responses of consequences and incentive to address behavior and promote positive change. EBP integrates the best available research, clinician expertise and client characteristics to promote offender change and reduce recidivism.  During fiscal year 2010-11 the adult probation department collected $180,000 in restitution for victims of crime. Probationer‗s completed 49,000 hours of community restitution hours in the communities of Navajo County.  Ten probationers successfully completed the Thinking for Change program in 2010-2011, which was offered by the adult probation department. This is a problem solving program embellished by both cognitive restructuring and social skills interventions.  Another program provided by the adult probation department is Substance Abuse Cognitive Education. The program is a six week program that is attended once a week for two hours sessions. Fifteen probationers successfully completed this program for 2010-2011.  Juvenile probationers in Navajo County have worked a total of 7,287 hours in community restitution. The communities of Navajo County benefit from the service of these hours. When figured at the equivalent minimum wage of $7.25 per hour this equates to $52,830.75.  The juvenile collection program collected $675 in fines, $42,165 in probation fees, and $18,600 in victim restitution payments including monies collected through participation in the state tax interception program. 118 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  The juvenile detention center booked in a total of 427 juveniles during calendar year 2010. The average length of stay in the juvenile facility was 10.6 days. Total days of care for calendar year 2010 was 4,378.12.  The pre-trial services program‗s primary purpose is to advocate for the release of low risk defendants from jail who might not otherwise be able to post a monetary bond. Pre-trial services offers assistance in relieving jail overcrowding and provides a significant cost avoidance to the county and tax payers of Navajo County. This past year pre-trial services supervised 421 defendants totaling a cost avoidance of $2,505,035. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  Improving information sharing with our constituents will continue to be a focus of the judicial b ranch. Improvements to information available by means of the internet for both the Superior and Justice Courts will remain a focal point for the upcoming year.  The courts will work to improve the ability to accept payments by means of credit/debit. The current automation system has offered challenges to this process. Therefore improvements and development of this procedure are needed.  The Justice Courts will begin the process necessary to analyze data in the current case management system and have it prepared for conversion into the new case management system being developed by the Supreme Court. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Promoting public safety by making a positive difference in the lives of offenders, families, victims and the community will remain a priority of the probation departments. Officers will continue to assess offenders‘ risk/needs in order to help guide court decisions and apply the appropriate level of services. The departments will continue to provide supervision, intervention and treatment for probationers. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Navajo County judicial branch will continue its commitment to the citizens and strive to make the Arizona justice system the best system possible, to better serve Navajo County citizens. Fiscal responsibility remains a top priority. Budgets are reviewed monthly and alternative funding and service providers are sought when permissible.  Navajo County has always taken pride in being on the forefront of innovative initiatives for the collection of court imposed sanctions. Facing economic declines and shrinking budgets will require the courts to look deeper and use other creative techniques to ensure debtors meet their financial responsibility in paying their obligations. Local enforcement, and continued participate in the State Tax Intercept Program and FARE will help to ensure compliance of non-paying offenders. 119 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  The Clerk of the Court will continue to establish efficient and effective processes that provide superior service; and continue the process of digitalization of marriage licenses and manual dockets to electronic format for ease of access.  Pre-trial aervices (PTS) will continue to advocate for the release of low-risk defendants that would otherwise not be able to post a monetary bond. PTS anticipates providing services to 350 400 low-risk defendants, thus relieving jail overcrowding and providing cost avoidance to the county in the amount of approximately $2,000,000.  The Clerk of the Court will continue to establish efficient and effective processes that provide superior service; and continue the process of digitalization of marriage licenses and manual dockets to electronic format for ease of access. 120 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 Presiding Judge Judicial Branch Superior Court Judge Div II Superior Court Judge Div I Superior Court Judge Div III Court Reporter Court Reporter Court Reporter Judicial Assistant Judicial Assistant Judicial Assistant Sr. Judicial Assistant Court Commissioner Court Reporter Court Services Coordinator Court Administrator Superior Court Court Caseflow Manager CASA Accountant Judicial Secretary Judicial Secretary Collections/Deferral Supervisor Court Security Officer Collections/Deferral Spec (3) Bailiff/Court Security (2) Court Interpreter Court Assistant Bailiff (Temp) (2) Pre-Trial Services Officer Pre-Trial Surveillance Officer Pre-trial Investigator DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Reduction in General Fund is due to the loss of a Court Reporter position. Changes in Special Revenue funds is due to changes in grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Superior Court General Fund FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 25.50 25.50 25.82 24.47 24.02 Aztec Field Trainer 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.43 Court Appointed Special Advocate 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Child Support 1.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Child Support Visitation Fund 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Conciliation Court Fees 0.60 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 Court Improvement 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Drug Enforcement Grant 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.53 0.48 Fill the Gap 5.00 3.25 2.75 2.82 2.32 Noticing & Court Clerk - Fill the Gap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.63 32.65 33.00 32.00 31.00 Superior Court Total 121 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There is a slight decrease in the General Fund expenditures, although there were increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The Special Revenue increase is due to a change in reporting of funds that were previously reported under other departments. For this reason, the overall budget for this department increased by 25.99%, of that, the General Fund decreased by .21%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 2,719,058 605,186 Balance Forward Total Sources 2,710,944 $ 469,162 897,401 2,566,164 $ 964,589 1,062,269 674,089 2,713,405 -0.21% 2,547,504 442.99% 94,086 -91.14% $ 4,213,530 $ 4,250,489 $ 4,204,842 $ 5,354,995 25.99% $ 1,958,074 $ 2,046,005 $ 2,725,264 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses $ 2,970,517 45.19% 41,735 36,685 54,867 77,950 112.48% 1,282,621 2,157,634 1,319,411 2,238,605 3.75% 15,474 10,165 11,214 67,923 568.20% 25.99% 3,297,905 $ 4,250,489 Accounting Adjustments* $ (85,827) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 829,798 $ - * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. $ $ 4,110,756 94,086 $ 5,354,995 $ - N/A $ - N/A 122 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 Clerk of the Court Chief Deputy Superior Court Clerk (7) Account Specialist Child Support Case Mgr Records Clerk Account Specialist Courtroom Clerk Supervisor Superior Courtroom Clerk I Superior Courtroom Clerk II (4) Superior Courtroom Clerk II (5) Superior Courtroom Clerk I MISSION STATEMENT To assist the Navajo County Superior Court in the execution and enforcement of its rights and duties by authority granted to the Judiciary in the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION  Process, maintain and preserve the court records including felony, civil, domestic relations, Non IV-D child support, Fines, Fees and Restitution Enforcement (FARE) program, probate, guardianship, adoption, mental health, juvenile delinquency and lower court of appeals;  Process, record and issue marriage licenses, private process servers, bail bonds-men, and passport applications as applicable;  Compile and maintain statistics of pending cases and other business of the court;  Assure the attendance of a clerk in all court proceedings in order to transcribe and prepare minute entries for distribution to appropriate parties;  Qualify, maintain and provide jurors for all court trials;  Ensure accurate ad safe handling of all financial assessments, receipting, reporting and disbursement of public monies;  Assist court customers with courtesy, respect and impartiality;  Safeguard all exhibits and evidence. 123 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Enhanced public access with web viewing of minute entries of all case types that are public record.  Phase I of digitalization of old marriage records and old docket books.  Cost saving training was held on site to meet the required co-jet hours.  Pilot court for the Fines, Fees and Restitution Enforcement (FARE) program enforcing defendants to pay what they owe.  Emailing orders, notices, minute entries and other documents that were previously sent by U.S. mail, resulting in a savings of postage costs. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Continued training of staff in excellent customer service skills. Conduct two training sessions per fiscal year.  Establish efficient and more effective processes to provide superior service to the public and all other departments within the county and state. Complete a review and modification of workflow processes. Target completion date for review June 30, 2012.  Phase II of digitalization of old court records. One-third of all records digitalized by June 30, 2012.  Recertification of staff on passport applications; eleven employees.  Further development of the Clerk of Superior Court website to provide information to court customers, victims and litigants. Perform monthly evaluations of website content and update appropriately. Strive to place customer orientated information on website; forms, fee schedule etc. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Maintain one vacant position to realize vacancy savings for fiscal year 2011-12.  Continue to participate in the FARE program. This program assists the courts in upholding the rule of the law enforcing defendants to pay what they owe.  Electronic filing of all case types to the Court of Appeals – 100% participation. This results in a cost savings for paper and postage. 124 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Clerk of the Court FY 08 Budget General Fund FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 Child Support IV-D Local Juvenile Criminal Enhancement Fund 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 Document Storage & Retrieval 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Fill the Gap - State 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 24.00 24.00 23.00 23.00 22.50 Clerk of the Court Total DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The decrease in General Fund expenditures is due mainly to decreases in medical benefits. The increase in the Special Revenue budget is due to a minor increase in grant revenues. The overall budget for this department decreased by 5.33%, of that, the General Fund budget decreased by 4.96%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue Balance Forw ard Total Sources 1,098,374 $ 1,332,774 $ 1,103,335 $ 1,266,734 -4.96% 55,469 45,500 53,501 49,000 7.69% 189,839 217,706 208,912 195,240 -10.32% $ 1,343,682 $ 1,595,980 $ 1,365,748 $ 1,510,974 -5.33% $ 962,519 $ 1,079,575 $ 967,487 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Prof essional Services Capital Outlay 1,035,505 -4.08% 5,495 8,600 11,262 8,600 0.00% 154,231 286,343 183,704 290,222 1.35% 6,925 221,462 8,055 176,647 -20.24% -5.33% $ 1,129,171 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 3,341 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 217,851 $ - Total Uses 1,595,980 $ $ * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. 1,170,508 195,240 $ 1,510,974 $ - N/A $ - N/A 125 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW General Fund Expenditures $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $938,648 $1,055,164 $938,753 $989,124 5,495 8,600 10,600 8,600 154,231 269,010 153,982 269,010 - - - - $1,098,374 $1,332,774 $1,103,335 $1,266,734 126 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUSTICE COURTS FY 2011-12 Presiding Judge Judicial Branch Snowflake JP Snowflake Justice Court Kayenta JP Kayenta Justice Court Holbrook JP Holbrook Justice Court Winslow JP Winslow Justice Court Pinetop JP Pinetop Justice Court Show Low JP Show Low Justice Court Sr. Justice Court Clerk Snowflake Justice Court Sr. Justice Court Clerk Kayenta Justice Court Sr. Justice Court Clerk Holbrook Justice Court Sr. Justice Court Clerk Winslow Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Pinetop Justice Court Sr. Justice Court Clerk Show Low Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Snowflake Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Holbrook Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Winslow Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Pinetop Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Show Low Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Snowflake Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Holbrook Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Winslow Justice Court (DM) Justice Court Clerk Pinetop Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Show Low Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Snowflake Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Holbrook Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Winslow Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Pinetop Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Show Low Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Snowflake Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Holbrook Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Winslow Justice Court Justice Court Clerk Pinetop Justice Court DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE) Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Holbrook Justice Court General Fund Justice of the Peace Ordinance Fee Justice Court Total FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 25.75 25.75 25.75 25.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 25.75 5.00 30.75 30.75 30.75 30.75 30.75 127 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUSTICE COURTS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There were no significant changes in the General Fund expenditures. The decrease in the Special Revenue expenditures is due to an decrease in the personal services line items. The overall budget for this department decreased by 7.24%, of that, the General Fund decreased by .04%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 1,722,003 $ 1,773,874 $ 1,784,577 $ 1,773,212 -0.04% Special Revenue $ 75,445 $ 257,100 $ 48,221 $ 103,500 -59.74% Balance Forward $ $ 134,861 $ 155,795 $ 132,274 -1.92% $ 2,165,835 $ 1,988,593 $ 2,008,986 -7.24% Total Sources (481,054) $ 1,316,395 Personal Services $ 1,744,844 $ 1,794,358 $ 1,622,395 $ 1,598,517 -10.91% Supplies $ 27,738 $ 31,275 $ 50,691 $ 67,725 116.55% Professional Services $ 141,515 $ 234,016 $ 151,058 $ 240,019 2.57% Capital Outlay $ $ 2,248 1,916,344 $ $ 106,186 2,165,835 $ $ 32,175 1,856,319 $ $ 102,725 2,008,986 -3.26% -7.24% Accounting Adjustments* $ 181,751 $ - $ Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ (418,199) $ - $ Uses Total Uses * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 132,274 $ - N/A $ - N/A 128 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - ADULT PROBATION FY 2011-12 Presiding Judge Chief Probation Officer Deputy Chief Probation Officer Probation Officer III Probation Officer III Probation Officer III Probation Officer III Probation Officer III Probation Officer III Probation Officer II (2) Probation Officer II (3) Probation Officer II (1) Probation Officer II Drug Court Probation Officer II (3) Probation Officer I Probation Officer II (2) Presentence Screener II Secretary Secretary Secretary - PT Surveillance Officer II Probation Officer II (3) Secretary Accountant Senior Secretary Account Clerk 129 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - ADULT PROBATION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). The total number of FTE's has increased by 1 in Special Revenue funding sources due to the increase in grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source FY 08 Budget Adult Probation FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 10.00 10.00 8.72 8.50 8.50 Adult Intensive Probation Services 10.50 10.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Adult Probation Services Fees 5.70 7.20 5.28 3.00 4.00 Community Punishment Program 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Community Oriented Policing Services Grant 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drug Court 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Drug Treatment Education 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Excess Adult Probation Fees 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Juvenile Criminal Enhancement Fund/Adult Intensive Probation Services 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 17.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 State Aid Enhancement Superior Court Adult Probation Total 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.20 48.00 38.50 35.00 36.00 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The increase in the General Fund expenditures is due to increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The decrease in the Special Revenue expenditures is due to the loss of some grants from the State of Arizona. The overall budget for this department decreased by 9.86%, of that, the General Fund increased 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue 528,875 Balance Forw ard Total Sources $ 1,725,377 611,872 $ 1,844,446 331,663 553,502 $ 1,360,195 450,019 697,982 613,511 0.27% 1,537,758 -16.63% 468,625 4.13% $ 2,585,914 $ 2,906,337 $ 2,611,679 $ 2,619,894 -9.86% $ 1,980,480 $ 2,208,611 $ 1,956,930 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay 1,923,180 -12.92% 72,552 60,409 61,805 46,909 -22.35% 121,592 560,081 124,319 574,570 2.59% 2,557 77,236 75,235 -2.59% -9.86% $ 2,177,181 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 42,815 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 451,548 $ - Total Uses * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 2,906,337 $ $ 2,143,054 468,625 $ 2,619,894 $ - N/A $ - N/A 130 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - ADULT PROBATION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW General Fund Expenditures $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $454,406 $515,159 $485,284 $516,798 Supplies 28,380 36,409 23,376 36,409 Professional Services 46,088 60,304 44,842 60,304 - - - - $528,875 $611,872 $553,502 $613,511 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 131 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUVENILE PROBATION FY 2011-12 Presiding Judge Juvenile Director Diversion Program Mgr Probation Officer III TX Coordinator JIPS PDR Probation Officer II Juvenile Operations Spec Accountant Probation Officer II (2) Safe Schools Ofcr Surveillance Officer II Probation Officer II Administrative Assistant Probation Officer II (2) Secretary Surveillance Officer II CWS/Outdoor Prog Program Coordinator I Prog Coor I PT PINETOP OFFICE SHOW LOW OFFICE Probation Officer II Probation Officer II SNOWFLAKE HOLBROOK OFFICE OFFICE Probation Officer II WINSLOW OFFICE Probation Officer II Probation Officer II Secretary Secretary Secretary Secretary Secretary DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Juvenile Probation FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 7.34 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Diversion Consequence 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 Diversion Intake 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Diversion Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 Juvenile Intense Probation 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.50 5.50 Juvenile Probation Service Diversion 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Juvenile Probation Services Fees 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.75 Juvenile Standard Probation 2.50 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 Juvenile Treatment Services 1.50 2.50 1.00 1.50 1.50 Safe School Juvenile Probation Total 4.66 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.50 29.50 27.00 25.00 22.00 23.00 132 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUVENILE PROBATION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The increase in the General Fund expenditures is due to increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The decrease in the Special Revenue expenditures is due to the loss of some grants from the State of Arizona. The overall budget for this department increased by 1.59%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 460,494 924,787 Balance Forw ard Total Sources 410,171 $ 958,411 211,205 425,070 $ 909,649 239,131 235,347 474,687 3.08% 932,885 -2.66% 276,857 15.78% $ 1,546,163 $ 1,658,036 $ 1,570,066 $ 1,684,429 1.59% $ 1,216,824 $ 1,338,554 $ 1,158,947 $ Uses Personal Services 1,307,167 -2.34% Supplies 27,097 40,137 38,560 148,247 269.35% Prof essional Services 77,866 279,345 95,702 228,250 -18.29% 765 N/A 1.59% Capital Outlay - - $ 1,321,786 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 50,863 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 275,240 $ - Total Uses 1,658,036 $ $ 1,293,209 $ 276,857 1,684,429 $ - N/A $ - N/A General Fund Expenditures $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $374,102 $407,125 $388,474 $427,287 Supplies 13,253 19,350 15,929 19,150 Professional Services 22,815 34,019 20,667 28,250 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures - - - - $410,171 $460,494 $425,070 $474,687 133 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUVENILE DETENTION FY 2011-12 Presiding Judge Juvenile Director Juvenile Detention Manager Operations Supervisor Juvenile Detention Officer, Sr (2) Juvenile Detention Shift Supervisor Juvenile Detention Shift Supervisor Juvenile Detention Shift Supervisor Juvenile Detention Shift Supervisor Juvenile Detention Officer (2) Juvenile Detention Officer, Sr (2) Juvenile Detention Officer, Sr (2) Juvenile Detention Officer, Sr (2) Juvenile Detention Offficer, Sr (2) DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Juvenile Detention FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 Juvenile Detention Total 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 134 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT - JUVENILE DETENTION FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The slight decrease in the General Fund expenditures is due mainly to slight decreases in personal services and supplies. The overall budget for this department decreased by .51%, of that, the General Fund decreased by .49%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 1,051,373 Special Revenue $ 1,101,304 1,457 Balance Forw ard 7,157 Total Sources $ 1,850 1,078,172 $ 1,396 7,489 7,492 1,095,947 -0.49% 1,000 -45.95% 8,012 6.98% $ 1,059,986 $ 1,110,643 $ 1,087,060 $ 1,104,959 -0.51% $ 993,427 $ 1,039,704 $ 1,026,920 $ Uses Personal Services 1,032,347 -0.71% Supplies 27,919 36,789 21,745 30,450 -17.23% Professional Services 31,146 34,150 30,383 42,162 23.46% - - - N/A -0.51% Capital Outlay Total Uses Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 1,052,492 $ $ 7,494 $ 1,110,643 - $ 1,079,048 $ $ 8,012 $ 1,104,959 - N/A General Fund Expenditures $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- Personal Services 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $993,427 $1,037,704 $1,026,920 $1,032,347 Supplies 27,919 29,450 21,121 29,450 Professional Services 30,027 34,150 30,131 34,150 - - - - $1,051,373 $1,101,304 $1,078,172 $1,095,947 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 135 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LEGAL DEFENDER FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager Legal Defender Attorney II Administrative Assistant Attorney III Secretary MISSION STATEMENT Provide effective, ethical and meaningful legal representation in a timely, professional manner. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County legal defender‘s office was established for representation of indigent defendants in criminal cases in situations where the public defender‘s office may have a conflict of interest. This usually occurs when there are multiple people charged in the same incident or another conflict such as the public defender having previously represented the victim or a potential witness. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Adjudicated 88% of our felony cases within 180 days.  Provided valuable legal representation to indigent clients with felonies and misdemeanors that led to an effectual resolution.  Went beyond the normal scope of our responsibilities to help find counseling, housing and rehabilitation for our clients in need.  Reduced spending on office supplies by 48% over 2009-2010 budget and exceeded our goal of a 15% reduction for 2010-11. 136 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LEGAL DEFENDER FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  The legal defender‘s office will continue to serve our clients in a timely, polite and respectful manner. Our goal is to keep in contact with our clients and return all calls from clients and their family members. We help keep lines of communication open between inmates and their families so that there is support for the defendant in court and so that the family members are better informed of court procedures and policies. This helps create less confusion in court and engenders better will towards the county court system in general. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Part of the successful rehabilitation of defendants includes continuing support during and sometimes after sentencing. By ensuring that a defendant has access to counseling, housing and employment opportunities, the legal defender‘s office helps to encourage clients to do better in the community. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  This office has continuously worked towards reducing spending in every area possible. In 201112 our goal is to cut our use of postage by at least 15% by using email and other technology to pass information to our clients and business associates. This should also help by getting clients faster notice of court proceeding and therefore more lead time before court. We are still working towards finding a better, less expensive solution to our current WestLaw liability by possible combining our office with one or both of the other offices here at the county that subscribe to this service. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  In 2010-11 we reduced the amount of paper used by almost 20% by printing double sided and editing to keep motions and other paperwork to a minimal number of pages. In conjunction with our 2012 goal to reduce spending on postage by notifying clients electronically we hope to reduce our paper usage by another 10%. The legal defender‘s office also has a strong recycling policy to which we adhere throughout the year. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  The legal defender‘s office often assists other defense attorneys by maintaining a database of basic forms and a quick reference library here at the county. By being willing to help or cooperate with other offices here in Navajo County, as well as elsewhere in the State of Arizona and nationwide we are creating a stronger, more available network. 137 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LEGAL DEFENDER FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source FY 08 Budget Legal Defender FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 5.00 5.00 4.60 4.60 4.45 LDO Indigent Assessment Fee 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.55 Legal Defender Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There is a slight decrease in the General Fund expenditures, as some expenditures have been moved to Special Revenue funding. The overall budget for this department decreased by .56%, with a General Fund decrease of 1.10%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue Balance Forw ard Total Sources 378,266 374,906 -1.10% 7,722 $ 379,084 28,643 $ 364,657 51,551 $ 28,905 0.91% 89,359 54,071 37,153 55,410 2.48% $ 475,347 $ 461,798 $ 453,361 $ 459,221 -0.56% $ 390,176 $ 391,437 $ 376,830 $ 396,686 1.34% Uses Personal Services Supplies Prof essional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses 4,199 5,000 4,197 5,000 0.00% 24,144 65,361 15,399 57,535 -11.97% 459,221 N/A -0.56% 1,481 $ 419,999 $ 461,798 Accounting Adjustments* $ (1,462) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 53,886 $ - 1,525 $ $ * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. 397,951 55,410 $ $ - N/A $ - N/A 138 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LEGAL DEFENDER FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW General Fund Expenditures $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $378,266 $379,084 $364,594 $374,906 Supplies - - 63 - Professional Services - - - - Capital Outlay - - - - $378,266 $379,084 $364,657 $374,906 Personal Services Total General Fund Expenditures 139 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager Library District Director Early Childhool Literacy Specialist Library Assistant Library Automation Technician MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County Library District exists to aid and improve the services, materials, and technology provided by the member public libraries in the county to make people‘s lives better. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Navajo County library district, with a staff of five employees, coordinates countywide public library services and is an advisor and consultant to the thirteen member libraries in the county, representing our libraries professionally on a local, state and national level. The library district receives and administers annual State Grants-in-Aid and seeks out other grant funding opportunities that will enhance library services in the county. Our office provides training and professional growth opportunities for library staff throughout the service area. The library district maintains a countywide integrated automation system, enabling county residents to freely use any materials in any of the libraries with the same library card, and provides a courier service among libraries so that materials can be conveniently delivered to whichever location is best for our patrons. The library district purchases, processes and makes shelf-ready many different materials, such as audiobooks, DVDs, music CDs, large print books, graphic novels, adult literacy materials, and more, which are made available to the public either through rotating collections or as part of an individual library‘s collection. For materials not available in our system, the library district offers cost -free interlibrary loan service to patrons to borrow materials nationwide as needed. Navajo County library district maintains a website at www.navajocountylibraries.org that forms the primary web presence for most of the public libraries in the county. The library district gives additional direction and financial support to the volunteer libraries in unincorporated communities in Navajo County. 140 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Worked closely with the Arizona State Library to implement federal stimulus funding awarded from the Broadband Technologies Program. Of the $1,278,528 awarded, Navajo County‘s public libraries received a commitment of $157,700 for this AzPAC project, which the library district administered to purchase 130 public access computers for ten libraries plus software and other equipment, and gave much technical support to configure and set them up in the various libraries. The library district provided 20% matching funds for this stimulus package.  Completed an Library Services Technology Act (LSTA) grant for $13,470 in which we held Technology Expos showcasing the latest technical gadgets and gizmos in most of Navajo County‘s public libraries. People responded enthusiastically to the hands-on opportunity, especially when we had an iPad at the Expo.  Wrote and was awarded a grant for $7,312, called ―Senior Trips down Memory Lane‖ to make available Remembering Kits from Bi-Folkal Productions for programming to senior citizens in our senior citizen centers and rest homes as well as to other groups and individuals.  Besides the database subscriptions which the Library District subscribes to that are accessible to all library cardholders, we added access to Natural Standard, a database that provides high quality information about complementary medicine and alternative therapies.  Spent many hours working on and sending out to the libraries Early Literacy kits purchased through an Library Services Technology Act (LSTA) grant for $33,070 for early literacy development in the birth to five-year-olds. The kits contain a book and various manipulatives to provide a multisensory approach to working with babies and toddlers. The libraries will each receive between 120-200 kits when this project is finished.  Continued to make significant enhancements and additions to the library district‘s website, such as adding a whole new section for teens called the TeenPak, regularly adding video clips of author interviews or book reviews, photos to the friends‘ page, and continuously adding new informative material to the home page.  Wrote and was awarded a grant for $8,000 – ―Dewey Meets Droid‖ 21st Century library catalog enhancements for users, which enables us to subscribe to LibraryThing (significantly increasing the subject access and ease of browsing the catalog), Library Anywhere (making the catalog available on mobile devices), and video clips within the catalog.  Received and expended a Special Resources Allotment grant for $5,000 from the Arizona State Library to purchase new books, DVDs, and music CDs.  Secured E-rate funding commitments from the schools and libraries division for the library district in the amount of $43,814.21 and for the thirteen libraries $12,6218.35 for telecommunications and Internet costs.  Assisted the Hopi Department of Education in writing a federal Native Enhancement Grant for $150,000 to acquire and operate a mobile computer lab in tandem with the bookmobile to provide public access computers for Internet searching and training. The grant was awarded and fully funded. 141 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Selected, cataloged, and processed books for four Native American grants of $2,500 each for the Hopi, Cibecue, McNary and Whiteriver libraries. Hundreds of new books were added to their collections.  Upgraded the computer lab replacing the old laptops with fourteen new laptops which are used to give training in the member public libraries or other suitable locations with high speed Internet connections. Increased training sessions throughout the year.  Implemented the First Things First grant for $50,000 to enhance early literacy in the birth to 5 age group by hiring an early childhood literacy specialist who has given programs in a variety of venues.  Began providing book repair service to all the libraries in the county, with the purchase of a new CoverOne binding repair machine. This is hugely popular among the librarians and eases their workload and backlogs.  Subscribed to downloadable audiobooks online, offering almost 3,000 titles through Recorded Books/NetLibrary to library card holders.  Began a partnership with the Navajo County Sheriff‘s Department and the County Attorney to assemble Backpacks for Youth for disadvantaged children caught up in unfortunate circumstances. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Add useful features and links to the library district‘s web pages to better meet the information needs of our patrons, and monitor through annual website use tracking.  Evaluate the need for additional database subscriptions based on patron and library staff feedback, and develop a list of renewals and new subscriptions for the annual budget.  Maintain the availability of computer and Internet training classes for the public around the county utilizing the library district‘s portable computer lab for a minimum of twelve training sessions per year.  Provide a prompt response within two business days to requests for technical assistance and computer repair for all the member libraries.  Maintain staffing levels in order to improve the response time for sending out new materials and collections, and processing donations sent to us by the member libraries.  Offer special assistance to the member libraries in ways that will enable them to give excellent service to their patrons, whether it be sending staff to help out when they are short of help, purchasing labor-saving equipment, adding useful online features, scheduling workshops in the county, or other ways that meet their needs. 142 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Keep abreast of advancements in information technology that are desired by citizens and be nimble to make available resources that can be practically and economically added to the libraries‘ collections and services, such as eBooks and eReaders and mobile applications.  Work with First Things First to implement a $60,000 renewal grant to improve early literacy in parts of the service area by having the early childhood literacy specialist target parent and caregiver training in our libraries, pregnancy centers, and other venues for the birth to five year old age groups, and in partnership with other early childhood care providers.  Assist with the ongoing implementation of the Arizona State Library’s federal stimulus grant, Broadband Technology Opportunity Program II, which brings career kiosks to each of our libraries, plus a career training center in Holbrook Public Library.  Assist the new Kayenta Community Library to become fully functional after moving into the trailer that was donated by the county by retrospectively converting the collection, installing staff computers, and training the staff in use of the automation system.  Continue to enhance the rotating collections with the addition of new materials. Weed and replace outdated materials in selected subject areas in the various libraries.  Implement and administer three new Library Services Technology Act (LSTA) grant applications, should they be awarded, which are three diverse projects that will directly affect the lives of our citizens in a positive way.  Assist the bookmobile staff with additional training and help ensure that the bookmobile is wellstocked, the Internet access is stable, and the routes and scheduled stops are serving the communities well.  Work with the Hopi Education Department to implement their grant-funded mobile computer lab, which will operate in tandem with the bookmobile. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Explore grant funding opportunities, and apply for grants that support the mission of the library district. Assist other county libraries with writing their grant applications upon request.  Implement the Arizona State Library’s federal stimulus grant, Broadband Technology Opportunity Program I, for Navajo County from which most of our libraries will be receiving a number of new computers. 143 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Apply for E-rate funding for the library district and each member library and administer the program throughout the year to maximize the financial benefits of the federal E-rate program for each of our libraries and the library district for telecommunications, internet access and internet equipment costs.  Increase use of videoconferencing among libraries to reduce travel expenses, and to ensure increased participation in meetings and workshops.  Complete the purchases for the AzPAC stimulus project by carefully maximizing the returns on dollars available for computers and peripherals.  Assist the libraries in retrieving materials from delinquent patrons so that others may have increased access to these materials and good stewardship of taxpayers‘ support is manifested. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  If grant funding is awarded, will create and maintain a local history webpage comprised of historical documents and photo albums of historical local photos from the various museums and community resources with at least fifty photos from each of the five larger communities represented.  Will have a colorful directory created of all the county‘s libraries and museums, including those on the reservations, to promote the Arizona Centennial, highlighting significant cultural collections in these institutions, with an initial printing of 50,000 pamphlets for distribution to the public. This goal is contingent upon an award of grant funding.  Will acquire fifteen oral histories from various older citizens as part of the Capturing Arizona‘s Stories project, which may be posted on the local history webpage. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). The reduction in Library District is due to the Network Technician position being abolished and the reduction of one employee to .75 FTE to accommodate available grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Library District FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget Library District 4.00 4.00 4.50 5.00 4.00 First Things First Early Childhood Literacy 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.75 Library District Total 4.00 4.00 4.50 6.00 4.75 144 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: Navajo County Library District's budget has increased by 71.19% from fiscal year 2010. This is due to a increase in revenues. The Special Revenue budget has declined by 26.76%, this is due to the proper closure of old grant funds. The overall budget for this department decreased by 6.44%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources Library District Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 51,291 Balance Forw ard Total Sources 484,471 305,388 $ 155,575 320,270 505,538 $ 81,591 209,545 (10,820) 522,788 71.19% 113,936 -26.76% (9,378) $ 856,032 $ 670,508 $ 576,309 $ 627,346 $ 215,472 $ 318,104 $ 306,029 $ -104.48% -6.44% Uses Personal Services 344,607 8.33% 14,646 19,500 17,882 23,491 20.47% Professional Services 183,551 275,904 175,929 186,003 -32.58% Capital Outlay 119,104 57,000 85,847 73,245 28.50% -6.44% Supplies $ Total Uses Accounting Adjustments * $ Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 532,773 (9,699) 313,561 $ 670,508 $ - $ - $ $ 585,687 (9,378) $ 627,346 $ - N/A $ - N/A * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. Navajo County Library District $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Personal Services 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted $215,472 $318,104 $278,602 $302,521 Supplies 13,599 19,500 15,086 14,750 Professional Services 172,458 275,904 149,787 143,710 Capital Outlay 79,664 57,000 62,063 61,807 $481,193 $670,508 $505,538 $522,788 Total Library District Expenditures 145 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC DEFENDER FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager Public Defender Attorney III (5) Attorney I Special Investigator Office Manager Sr Legal Secretary Legal Secretary Office Support Specialist (2) MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Navajo County Public Defender‘s office is to protect the fundamental rights of indigent defendants by providing superior legal representation in criminal cases. This mission includes educating the community of indigents about their rights and the criminal justice process. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Public Defender‘s office is the response to the United States and Arizona Constitutional promise of legal representation for indigents articulated in the United States Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainright. This office is staffed by six lawyers, one investigator, and four support staff. We handle felony and misdemeanor criminal cases in the Navajo County Superior Court and the justice courts of the county (including Holbrook, Kayenta, Winslow, Pinetop-Lakeside, and Snowflake). We are also appointed counsel in mental health cases, juvenile matters and extraditions, and participate in the administration of the County‘s two specialty courts, Drug Court and Mental Health Court. 146 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC DEFENDER FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Implemented the new case management system and had a very successful and painless data conversion. The system will make the office more efficient.  The Board of Supervisors approved assigning dependency cases to this office which will result in a general fund savings of approximately $30,000 in attorney‘s fees.  Staffed the offices in South County at least three days per week which will provides easier access for the South County population.  Our Attorney I and part-time Legal Secretary are funded from the Indigent Assessment Fee fund; resulting in a General Fund savings. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Complete transition of staff for the South County Office by August 1, 2011.  Decrease the time to close cases by 5%.  Utilize the new county office in Dilcon to meet with clients from that area at least once per month. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Create a complete Motions Bank in Justware Program by October 1, 2011- Restructure case assignments to facilitate the processing of cases. This will be done by October 1, 2011.  Provide adequate training that allows for the Attorney I to be able to competently handle a felony case load by January 1, 2012.  Provide adequate training that enables each attorney in the office to handle any case in the office, including mental health, dependency, and juvenile delinquency, by January 1, 2012. 147 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC DEFENDER FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). There are 2 FTE's that are included in vacancy savings pending changes in the economy. Additional positions in Special Revenue funds is due to availabe grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Public Defender FY 08 Budget General Fund FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 Fill the Gap Local 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Indigent Assessment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 Public Defender Total DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There were no significant changes in the General Fund or Special Revenue budget. The overall budget for this department decreased by 10.38%, of that, the General Fund budget decreased by 3.81%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 804,737 $ 1,066,341 $ 766,330 $ 1,025,757 -3.81% Special Revenue 122,784 66,447 106,046 64,604 -2.77% Balance Forw ard 349,066 415,131 371,210 296,946 -28.47% -10.38% Total Sources $ 1,276,586 $ 1,547,919 $ 1,243,586 $ 1,387,307 $ 797,469 $ 1,017,000 $ 818,082 $ Uses Personal Services 1,062,412 4.47% Supplies 13,780 21,000 7,681 13,500 -35.71% Prof essional Services 36,528 368,919 53,233 301,395 -18.30% Capital Outlay 39,082 141,000 67,644 10,000 -92.91% -10.38% $ 886,859 $ Accounting Adjustments * $ 23,042 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 412,769 $ - Total Uses 1,547,919 $ $ * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. 946,640 296,946 $ 1,387,307 $ - N/A $ - N/A 148 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC DEFENDER FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW General Fund Expenditures $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $789,202 $1,008,962 $751,582 $970,878 Supplies 6,523 8,500 6,092 8,500 Professional Services 9,012 48,879 8,656 46,379 - - - - $804,737 $1,066,341 $766,330 $1,025,757 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 149 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC FIDUCIARY FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Assistant County Manager Public Fiduciary Public Fiduciary Financial Specialist Estate Manager Sr. Case Manager Sr Case Manager Mental Health Case Manager MISSION STATEMENT The Navajo County public fiduciary provides guardianship, conservatorship and decedent services including other type services that the Court orders, in a professional, efficient and compassionate manner when no other person or corporation is qualified and willing to serve. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The public fiduciary is appointed by the Superior Court for those persons in need of guardianship or conservatorship, for decedent‘s estates in need of administration and for whom there is no person or corporation qualified and willing to act in that capacity. As a guardian, the public fiduciary ensures that the basic needs of an incapacitated person are met. These needs include, but are not limited to, personal, medical, psychiatric and housing. Annual accountings and guardianship reports are filed with the Court for approval. The Navajo County public fiduciary handles primarily indigent cases when there are not sufficient funds with which to pay a private fiduciary. 150 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC FIDUCIARY FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Completed the department policies and procedures manual.  Maintained quality of services with a reduced number of staff (from 9 to 6 staff) and with an increased case load (from 85 to 105).  During fiscal year 2010-11 the Public Relations program presented four community based education opportunities about fiduciary services and other services for the public in the Navajo County area.  Three education opportunities have been given to the all six fiduciary staff in order to enhance their performance.  The Navajo County public fiduciary staff provided training to other 11 Arizona public fiduciaries in September 2010.  The fiduciary team is pro-active and advocated for our wards by communicating with providers about the needs for additional group home, assisted living and nursing homes in Navajo County. Practically through these efforts three providers responded by:  A provider built a new facility and provides nursing home care and rehabilitation services;  Second provider expanded their assisted living facility.    Both agencies offered more jobs in the South County area.  Our wards were also benefited because we were able to bring many back to the Navajo County area which was closer to their family and friends. Third agency has hired new folks to provide assistance with the mental health individuals at the Seriously Mentally Ill (SMI) housing unit in the Holbrook area. The Public Surplus Auction has been a success on behalf of our wards.  This year we held two special auctions, one live and on on-line, which had the same amount and like product.  Live auction took less time to liquidate, however after advertising and other related expenses it yielded $23,000. It also had limited buyer potential.  On-line auction took a few weeks longer to liquidate, however after advertising and other related expenses it yielded $41,000. The buyer potential with this auction was nationwide.  With online auctions, we have increased our ability to liquidate wards personal property from one to two auctions a year to six auctions a year, with less time and expenses.  Our online auctions have been so successful it has given us the ability to provide much needed services to the wards and also allows us to recover some of the expenses relating to caring for our wards to be refunded back into the general fund. 151 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC FIDUCIARY FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  The Navajo County public fiduciary will continue to provide opportunities for training for its staff to improve their ability to meet Arizona Fiduciary Standards of Practice and provide high quality of advocacy of vulnerable and/or protected adult (wards) appointed to the care of the public fiduciary. The Navajo County public fiduciary will also provide Navajo County citizens with information which will assist in finding alternatives and appropriate avenues to assist a vulnerable and/or protected adult in need of outside assistance. Training will be offered no less than three times this fiscal year.  The Navajo County public fiduciary will be hosting an Arizona Public Fiduciary training seminar in 2011-12 to provide a variety of educational opportunities. ·  The Navajo County public fiduciary policies and procedures manual have been printed in fiscal year 2010-11.  Arizona Office of the Courts (AOC)– Fiduciary Division is revising the rules regarding the fiduciary profession, which is expected to be completed early 2011. Once the rules have been changed we will revised by end of fiscal year 2011-12.  Monthly staff meetings will be conducted to communicate failures, success and changes in approach with providers and/or wards.  Navajo County public fiduciary will continue to facilitate data collection and comprehensive tools to encourage uniform practices to strengthen our profession and service delivered to the wards.  The data is communicated through monthly reports to administration.  The data is discussed within monthly department meetings.  Data is also shared among 14 other public fiduciaries through the email and annual meetings.  All the methods above provide us with opportunities to be a proactive spokesperson and preserve the assets of the wards appointed under our care while improving delivery of fiduciary. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens  We are planning to revise our Navajo County public fiduciary website to include various links for the community access.  These links will provide valuable information in regards the responsibilities of a guardian and conservator for their family member(s). We hope to have this completed by July 2011.  We will be researching to confirm what sights can be shared to the community in order for the community to prepare their own Court petitions or reports. 152 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC FIDUCIARY FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued   Various other counties are utilizing a sight which provides the Court petitions and/or reports for the general public. We hope to obtain permissions to use the link by October 2011. We will be collecting and confirming what other area and state benefit options the community might access on their own without requiring a guardian and/or conservator.  We will be meeting with 14 other public fiduciaries in September 2011 to confirm resources that could be shared with the community;  Once confirmation has been given, we hope to be able to provide this information on the website by June 2012.  We are planning a minimum of four meetings at various locations in the County to provide awareness and understanding for alternatives and solutions to Navajo County citizens so the vulnerable and/or protected adults may benefit from their support and cooperation.  There is a continuing need for services for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with mental health and/or substance abuse individuals:  We are communicating through letters and meetings, with providers to encourage housing and services in the Navajo County area. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Public Fiduciary FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Public Fiduciary Total 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 153 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC FIDUCIARY FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There are no significant changes in the Public Fiduciary budget. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 389,116 $ 445,583 Special Revenue - - Balance Forward - - Total Sources $ 388,611 $ 445,583 0.00% N/A - - N/A $ 389,116 $ 445,583 $ 388,611 $ 445,583 0.00% $ 356,293 $ 367,083 $ 358,455 $ 373,218 1.67% Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ $ 5,737 14,000 6,905 10,500 -25.00% 27,085 64,500 23,251 61,865 -4.09% - - - - N/A 0.00% 389,116 - $ $ 445,583 - $ $ 388,611 - $ $ 445,583 - N/A 154 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Administration Assistant County Manager Health Director Administrative Assistant Health Assistant Health Director Health Program Manager-WIC Asst. Medical Examiner Investigatoar Community Nutrition Worker (6) Asst Med Examiner PT Community Nutrition Worker (PT) Health Program Coordinator Prenatal/Maternal Health Program Manager Animal Care Animal Control Officer Animal Care (2) Bioterrorism Program Manager PIO/Training Officer Bioterrorism Nurse Supervisor Detention Secretary Health Health Prog Mgr Tobacco Use Prevention Health Prog Mgr Environmental Health Health Program Manager Nutrition Health Educator 04 Tobacco Use Prevention (PT) Health Inspector Environmental Health Health Educator 03 Nutrition Senior Secretary Public Health Health Educator 05 Tobacco Use Prevention Health Educator 02 Smoke Free AZ (PT) Health Educator 08 Nutrition Secretary Health Educator 01 Tobacco Use Prev Health Inspector Environmental Health Heath Educator 09 Physical Activity Program (reclass) Secretary Public Health (2) Nurse (RN) Detention Nurse (RN) Detention Nurse (RN) Detention Nurse PT (LPN) Detention Health Educator 11 Nutrition Nurse (LPN) Detention Nurse (LPN) Detention Health Educator Nurtition Nurse (LPN) Detention Nurse (LPN-Temp) Detention Vital Records Specialist Reclass-Sec Nurse Supervisor Public Health Community Outreach Specialist Health/Bioterrorism Nurse Public Health (2) Nurse Public Health (PT) (2) Health Educator 10 Oral Health Department (new) Health Prog Mgr Teen Preg Prev Health Educator 13 Fluoride NEW Health Educator 07 Teen Pregnancy Prevention Health Educator 14 PT Teen Preg MISSION STATEMENT Promoting quality health through community education, planning and partnerships. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County Public Health Services District (NCPHSD) provides public health services to Navajo County. 155 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 Public Health Services District  The department director took on the added responsibility to serve as the Alternate Medical Examiner for the county.  The department was awarded two new grants this year; the Whiteriver First Things First grant and the Oral Health Grant. Nursing Services  Nursing services held a Public Health & School Nurse Networking Meeting and Training on February 10, 2011 at NPC in Snowflake with 25 representatives from Kayenta, Cedar, Holbrook, Winslow, Snowflake, Show Low, Heber, Whiteriver & NPC present. The event was a success with the groundwork laid for future networking and meetings to address not only immunizations, but all NCPHSD programs that can be coordinated with school health programs. Women, Infants, and Children  The Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) staff will be fully staffed upon the hiring of the last Show Low Community Nutrition Worker (CNW).  Most of our CNWs went through a week long breastfeeding training to enhance their breastfeeding knowledge to assist their clients. One CNW became certified as a Certified Breastfeeding Counselor (CBC).  Promoted World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) in August by holding raffles, and handing out breast feeding goodie bags.  Implemented PC Webcam High Risk Program. The nutritionist is able to successfully conduct HR counseling sessions via the PC Webcams between all WIC clinics.  For the first time we achieved a clean AG Audit for fiscal year 2009 with no findings. Recognition was given by Mr. James Menlove and Mr. James Jayne.  Received good reviews on our AZ Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) financial audit, with no findings.  Most staff members have completed the series of new mandatory online nutrition trainings as required by Arizona Department of Health Services WIC. There are a total series of 6 courses that they must take to enhance their nutrition knowledge to conduct their nutrition assessments on clients.  Collaborated with First Things First Oral Health Program to conduct Fluoride Varnish Clinics in our Holbrook and Show Low WIC Clinics. Teen Pregnancy Prevention  The program expanded to two more school districts within the county. 156 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  The program was awarded funding to hire a part-time staff member.  Program staff presented information through community outreach activities in communities throughout the county. Office of the Medical Examiner  Added the Alternate Medical Examiner position to an in house employee cutting cost.  Completed the policies and procedures manual.  Changed the investigators report writing system to better streamline the process.  Started using the Coconino County medical examiner for autopsy‘s thereby reducing travel costs.  Hired a new part time investigator.  We have direct involvement with the Navajo County drug project assisting them with presentations during the spring 2011 town hall meetings across the county.  We have participated in drug and alcohol presentations to multiple high schools within Navajo County.  Assisted the child fatality review board. Public Health Emergency Preparedness  Held first ―Drive Thru‖ shot clinic in Arizona‘s northern region.  Provided funds for two registered Nurses so that flu vaccine and immunizations could be given to the public.  Provided funds for multiple advertising in print, radio and cable media for flu and immunization clinics and Medical Reserve Corp requirement. Environmental Health  The environmental health program performed 532 inspections, responded to 31 complaints and has issued four notices of violation. The program also collected West Nile Positive mosquito samples in Woodruff and worked in collaboration with the Public Works department to remediate the problem area and reduce the breeding habitat of the mosquitoes. Tobacco Prevention  As of December 31, 2010 we have provided services to 1,877 students during red ribbon week and through other one time presentations. 413 students grade 5 th and 6th have been given intensive presentations (5 or more classes) on the dangers of tobacco and chronic disease. 15 inmates in the Winslow Deparment of Corrections were given wellness classes over six weeks, and 95 adults were enrolled in a prevention relapse program and 38 referrals were made to the Arizona Smokers Help Line. 1,257 people were given some type of information during health fairs, open houses, or other community events. 157 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued Animal Care and Control  Changed the name of the division to (Animal Care and Control). This was done to show a new direction and philosophy for the program.  A mission statement was developed to provide direction for the new division. Some of the areas covered were to provide compassionate, timely and effective responses to calls. To insure the safety of all citizens and animal populations through consistent enforcement of state laws and local ordinances relating to the humane treatment and control of animals.  A vision statement was developed. We envision a time when no animal will suffer abuse, neglect, or lack a loving home. Our citizens are educated on the importance of pet population control, disease prevention and responsible pet care and ownership.  Established a new professional appearance. New uniforms were established for a higher standard of professionalism and attitude toward the program.  Animal Care and Control Officers received nationally recognized training from NACA (National Animal Control Association) for a better, safer working knowledge of caring for and handling of animals to better serve the county.  New equipment – An inventory of equipment revealed that there was a huge equipment deficit among the officers and vehicles. Vehicles were retrofitted with highly visible emergency lighting for the safety of the officers, animals and the public. Equipment was purchased so that every officer had the same tools to safely and humanely do their job. The vehicles were conspicuously marked on all three sides with large six inch letters for easy public recognition.  A new Animal Care and Control Budget was developed for the new fiscal year, taking into consideration new equipment, replacement of worn out equipment and supplies needed to operate with. Priority equipment included officer safety items along with animal welfare equipment such as rescue stretchers with wheels and first aid kits for each vehicle.  A state-wide survey was conducted to benchmark best Animal Control practices that could be brought and used for our program.  We developed and implemented a new Animal Care and Control Website to provide a wealth of information and help bring resources to Navajo County citizens.  We developed a new record & document management system to our program (NCIS). Every aspect of a case from the initial call until the case is closed, is captured electronically and accessed electronically. Every detail is now documented and electronically archived. Some of the areas include photographs, county licenses, witness statements and all supporting documents pertaining to that case.  All incoming calls are now going through the Navajo County Sheriff Office Dispatch Center in Holbrook and not a voicemail. This was made to better serve the citizens of Navajo County. This allows the citizen to report a complaint 24/7 and give their information to a live person insuring them that complete information is received. In addition, it allows us to track date and times of calls received, response time, site visit times and the time the site was cleared via Sheriff Dispatch. 158 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued Animal Care and Control  Another major change is in the dog licensing program. All veterinarians and animal clinics that participate in providing county dog licenses can do so electronically with a secure user name and password via a web-based application linked into our NCIS database. This allows all the license information to be obtained in a matter of minutes in the field by animal control officers for the identification of any lost licensed dogs and their owner’s information. Being able to identify a lost dog and the owners address enables the officer to return the animal to its owner in the field, rather than transporting the animal to a County contracted animal shelter.  As mentioned above, officers do have the ability to access our new computer database in the field. We now have laptops in every vehicle with broadband modems to access our web-based data. This allows our officers to work more efficiently and effectively.  Because of our web-based Work Management System and Web-based access, we’re able to download digital photographs into the system called ―Search for Lost & Found Animals‖. Every stray animal picked up by Navajo County Animal Care and Control is photographed and entered into our program. This link exports the lost dog information into our web application where owners can search for their lost pets on line. The information can also provide the owner which shelter their lost pet was taken too.  We reevaluated our contract for exclusive pound services with the White Mountain Humane Society. The time spent transporting animals from all over the county to one facility, not to mention the problem with the humane transport of animals for long distances in extreme temperatures; it was in everyone’s best interest to establish IGA‘s (intergovernmental Agreements) with Animal Control Shelters throughout the county. It makes sense to find your lost animal at the closest shelter. It also makes it more effective and efficient from a management and cost effective perspective. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  The Public Health Services District will continue to provide Vital Records outreach to Whiteriver, Kayenta, and Hopi on a quarterly basis and plan to provide this service to Show Low on a monthly basis by June 30, 2012.  The District website will be updated with all programs listed on a biannual basis or more often as needed.  By September 30, 2011, increase the proportion of SNAP recipients and eligibles aged two years and older who meet dietary recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption.  By September 30, 2011, increase the number of learning opportunities for SNAP recipients and eligibles that would promote cost-saving strategies while encouraging healthy food choices. 159 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  By September 30, 2011, increase the proportion of SNAP recipient and eligible children who participate in cumulative intermittent physical activity for 60 minutes a day. The Physical Activity Program has the following goals:  By March 31, 2012, increase the proportion of children who participate in cumulative intermittent physical activity for 60 minutes a day.  By March 31, 2012, the program staff will participate in four community events to increase their knowledge of increasing cumulative intermittent physical activity for 60 minutes a day. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  The District will be Project Public Health Ready recognized by July 31, 2011.  The Public Health Emergency Preparedness Program plans to increase the number of Medical Reserve Corp volunteers by 25% by June 30, 2012.  Continue to educate the public, and gain voluntary compliance to reduce the number of domestic animals running loose in Navajo County.  By March 31, 2012, the program staff will participate in four community coalitions meetings in order to cooperate and collaborate on wellness issues of the local communities where the Physical Activity Program is implemented.  Animals found in Navajo County are only kept for a short time in local; shelters. We need to try and learn more and work with other recourses, so to place unwanted animals by adoption or rescue.  Continue to promote public understanding and awareness of the need for getting their domestic animals vaccinated and licensed, for the protection of the public and their animals. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens  The Office of the Medical Examiner plans to send the new Medical Examiner Investigator to St. Louis for formal training in death investigations by August 31, 2011.  The Family Planning Program annual goal is to decrease overall number of unplanned pregnancies among NCPHSD family planning program clients by at least 10% by June 30, 2012, as evidenced by client‘s ability to properly verbalize proper technique for using/taking their birth control method.  The Immunization Program annual goal is that by June 30, 2012 the NCPHSD will have a contract in place with AHCCCS to bill eligible clients for vaccines they receive through our Vaccine for Children Program, as evidenced by having the contract in place and actually billing AHCCCS for eligible clients.  The STD & HIV Program annual goal is to increase awareness of availability of affordable STD & HIV testing through NCPHSD, as evidenced by increasing the number of HIV &/or STD tests performed through our department by at least 10% by June 30, 2012. 160 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  The Peri-natal Hepatitis B Program annual goal is to increase education to hospitals, NCPHSD staff, primary care providers and OB offices to increase overall effectiveness and efficiency of our Peri-Natal Hepatitis B Program by June 30, 2012.  The TB Program annual goal is to increase education and knowledge of TB disease and control to health department staff and area stakeholders by June 30, 2012, as evidenced by proof of knowledge increase measureable through pre & post tests at trainings.  The Communicable Disease Program annual goal is to increase the number of network partners and their knowledge of proper disease reporting procedures by June 30, 2012, as evidenced by training evaluations and sign-in sheets and signature sheets for those providers/ practices receiving infectious disease binders.  The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program annual goal is to expand the Program to more school districts and the parents of teens by June 30, 2012.  The WIC Program will increase their current caseload by 10%, be fully staffed through the entire year, and have every staff member certified as either Certified Breastfeeding Counselors or Certified Lactation Counselors. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  The goal of the Environmental Health Program is to have 75% of establishment fees collected by July 1, 2011 and 90% collected by September 1, 2011.  The Public Health Services District will have 100% of its employees performing proper p-card reconciliations every month. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  The Public Health Services District will take a leadership role in the region by becoming the lead agency in a contract with First Things First-Navajo Nation and Coconino County to provide nutrition education to citizens of Coconino County and Navajo County who live on the Navajo Nation by December 31, 2011. 161 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). The number of FTE's by fund have both increased and decreased due to changes in grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Public Health District Navajo County Public Health District FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 26.18 26.18 28.13 29.23 28.05 Bio-Terrorism 5.00 3.25 3.25 3.00 2.80 Community Nurse/New born 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Early Intervention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Family Planning 0.10 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.20 Fluoride Varnish 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Human Immunodeficiency Virus 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.00 Immunization Services 0.65 0.65 0.50 0.50 0.55 Injury Prevention 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.00 Nutrition 1.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 Nutrition Netw ork 2.00 2.75 2.00 2.50 4.20 Oral Health 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Prenatal/Maternal 1.80 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.00 Public Health Coronary 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 Smoke Free Arizona 1.65 1.40 1.90 1.50 0.85 Teen Pregnancy Prevention 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 Tobacco Use Prevention 4.25 4.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Tuberculosis Grant 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 Women, Infants, Children (WIC) Public Health District Total 6.50 6.00 6.00 7.50 7.50 51.76 52.01 51.45 53.49 53.95 162 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: The overall budget for the Health District shows decreased revenues due to budgeted transfers out of the Health District Fund to cover the costs of construction of the new health building in south county. The overall budget for this department has decreased by 3.67%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources Health District Revenue $ 2,307,112 $ (142,403) $ 447,531 $ 987,132 -793.20% Special Revenue 988,844 1,885,278 1,304,801 1,941,006 2.96% Balance Forward 2,378,205 2,494,877 2,514,928 1,153,903 -53.75% -3.67% Total Sources $ 5,674,162 $ 4,237,752 $ 4,267,259 $ 4,082,041 $ 2,533,088 $ 2,812,922 $ 2,345,453 $ Uses Personal Services 2,655,001 -5.61% Supplies 195,823 328,085 228,554 224,901 -31.45% Professional Services 498,395 1,012,556 500,777 1,137,861 12.38% Capital Outlay 422,123 84,189 38,572 64,278 -23.65% -3.67% $ 3,649,429 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 468,240 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 2,492,973 $ - Total Uses 4,237,752 $ $ 3,113,356 1,153,903 $ 4,082,041 $ - N/A $ - N/A 163 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 164 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Administration Assistant County Manager Public Works Director Assistant Director/ County Engineer Engineering Project Manager Engineering Sr Engineering Project Manager Sr Rd Construction Inspector Engineering Engineering Project Manager Road Construction Inspector Engineering Survey Supervisor Engineering Deputy Director Highways Road Maintenance Foreman Road Yard Supv I Road Maintenance Foreman Road Maintenance Foreman Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Office Manager Administration Transportation Project Manager (2) Office Manager Administration Secretary (2) Road Yard Supervisor I Road Maintenance Foreman Crew Leader Holbrook Rd Yd Secretary Administration Sign Maint Foreman Sign Maintenance Worker Crew Leader Crew Leader Crew Leader Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (3) Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (3) Road Maint Equip Operator (3) Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (3) Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Sr Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Road Maint Equip Operator (3) Road Maint Equip Operator (2) Civil Engineer Sr Secretary Secretary Show Low Secretary Heber 165 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Board of Supervisors County Manager Administration Assistant County Manager Public Works Director Floodplain/Code Enforcement Administrator Hydrology Technician I Flood Control Equipment Shop Foreman Fleet Operations Crew Leader (Reclass Equip Mech) Equipment Mechanic Fleet Operations Secretary Fleet Operations Waste Tire Site Attendant Fleet Operations Deputy Director Fleet Operations Equipment Shop Supervisor Fleet Operations Equipment Shop Foreman Fleet Operations Equipment Mechanic Fleet Operations (5) Fiscal & Contracts Administrator Secretary Administration Equipment Shop Foreman Fleet Operations Equipment Mechanic Fleet Operations (2) Account Clerk GIS Coordinator GIS Drafter GIS GIS Analyst GIS Deputy Director Planning/Zoning Planner II Planning & Zoning Chief Building/ Zoning Inspector Building/Zoning Inspector Sr Building/Zoning Inspector - Heber 166 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 MISSION STATEMENT ―BEST CUSTOMER SERVICE‖ The public works department is charged to provide the best customer services for our citizens. To facilitate accomplishing this, the department has adopted the following basic principles:  Strive to treat the public and our customers courteously and impartially. Their concerns are to be fully and promptly addressed within the limits of our authority and resources.  Each division is responsible for creating, updating and reporting of their strategic plan on an annual basis.  Implement policies which adhere to state regulations and county ordinances to assure the legal and equitable distribution of resources.  Approaches to work-related challenges are to be developed on a team basis with emphasis on customer service. To encourage open communication, regular team meetings will be held. Decisions are to be made and challenges addressed at the lowest organizational level possible.  Substantial tasks are to be performed in accordance with schedules, budgets, plans and priorities. Schedules and plans are to be developed and progress monitored on a team basis. Desired results should be accomplished optimally with allowance for cross-training and safety.  The department's safety policy is to be fully implemented and safety should be the first priority.  All work-related issues should be considered and resolved through the proper channels. Work requests are to go through chain of command so that workloads can be managed.  Obtain appropriate equipment and tools which promote efficiency, safety and worker comfort. Maintain equipment and tools in a safe and reliable condition.  Effectively communicate and advocate public works issues.  Commit to excellence.  Training and career development programs are to be made available to all employees. Positive accomplishments are to be recognized and substandard work corrected.  Be positive. Starve problems and feed possibilities.  Identify challenges, resolve them, or adapt and go on.  Allow for mistakes. Mistakes happen. Learn from them but do not dwell on them.  Foster cooperation. Cooperation creates a positive climate that leads to teamwork and more constructive communication. 167 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The public works department consists of 86 employees divided into seven divisions: Engineering, Fiscal/Contract/GIS, Fleet Operations, Highways, Office Administration, Planning and Zoning, and Flood Control/Code Enforcement. Note: Of the seven divisions, only Planning and Zoning and Flood Control have separate budgets. Therefore FTE counts and budget summaries will be presented separately, all other divisions are presented under Public Works. Engineering: The engineering division provides the best possible engineering support services to both inside and outside customers, in a timely manner, respecting the rights of all, providing convenient and efficient facilities, while protecting the safety of the public. The engineering division provides design and technical knowledge for construction, maintenance and planning for roadways and drainage structures. The engineering division also reviews all subdivision plats, land development projects, and works with road improvement districts to ensure that the roadway standards, which are adopted by the county, are met. Fiscal/Contracts/GIS: The fiscal/contracts/GIS division is responsible for the financials and contracts within the public works department. The GIS group performs data analysis and creates custom maps for all county departments, issues all E911 addresses and maintains all associated maps, performs deed research pertaining to addressing and rights-of-way, designs, implements and maintains the department-wide enterprise system (NCIS), provides all data management and mapping tasks for the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) accounting and consults with other county departments who are interested in further developing their GIS capabilities. Fleet Operations: The fleet operations division establishes efficient and effective county fleet services by providing customers with safe, reliable, economical, environmentally-sound transportation and related support services that are responsible to the needs of the customers and that conserve vehicle value and equipment investment. Fleet operations is responsible for purchasing and maintaining the county‘s fleet of motor vehicles and equipment. The county fleet is serviced on a regular basis to ensure efficient operation. Fleet operations is also in charge of proper disposal of waste tires. Highways: The highway division constructs, improves, repairs and maintains county highways, roads and streets to ensure the safety and comfort of the public. The highway division is also responsible for sign maintenance, culvert maintenance, bridge maintenance, snow removal and issuing Right-of-Way permits. Office Administration: The office administration division is responsible for office support within all divisions of the public works department. Planning & Zoning/Building: The planning and zoning division is responsible to promote and ensure the orderly growth of development in the unincorporated areas of Navajo County. The building department is under the auspices of the planning and zoning division, reviews plans and conducts inspections for building and septic permits. The planning and zoning division processes: zoning cases, special use permits, comprehensive & area plans, subdivision platting, and other land development projects as part of their community development activities. 168 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION continued Flood Control/Code Enforcement: The flood control district interprets and upholds the flood damage prevention ordinances, responds to inquiries about flood status, and insures the county retains its flood insurance rating by following best floodplain management practices. The flood control district is responsible for the safe maintenance and operation of the flood control structures and properties the district owns. The code enforcement section of this division also addresses citizen complaints regarding code enforcement via the Navajo County zoning ordinance. ENGINEERING ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Wind Turbine Ordinance – provided engineering input to the wind turbine ordinance.  Obed Bridge – construction administration for new bridge rehabilitation work crossing the Little Colorado River.  Mountain View Improvement District – completed the construction of the pavement improvements.  RAC Grants – obtained grant funding for Pinedale Road Chip Seal, Porter Mountain Chip Seal, FS 153 & FS 95 rock trimming, and graveling 9600T emergency fire road out of Pinetop County Club.  Aripine County Road Improvement District (CRID) Dissolution – met with the community at several public meeting and determined that the majority of the resident‘s want to dissolve the CRID.  Scott‘s Pine Wash - culvert crossing design under Pine Dawn Road. Prepared the construction documents for the culvert installation.  Navajo Nation Road graveling projects – assisted Navajo Nation Department of Transportation by developing spread sheets to estimate road construction costs.  Road Safety Inspections – provided all necessary road inspections to inspect and document existing county road conditions and enter their findings into NCIS.  Woodruff-Snowflake Bridge Rehabilitation – prepared application and received Travel Enhancement Grant from Arizona Department of Transportation for the bridge repairs.  January 2010 Storm Damage Cost Estimates - completed an estimate for road repair cost for the nearly 100 miles of roads damaged by the January 2010 storm.  Fawn Brook Curbs and Paving – worked jointly with the City of Show Low to construct curbs and pave the subdivision.  Frontier Fields Parking Lot - worked jointly with the City of Show Low to construct new paved parking lot. 169 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Aripine County Road Improvement District Dissolution/Easement Transfer - CRID dissolution scheduled to be completed by end of March 2011. US Forest Service scheduled to transfer the road easements to the county by the end of April 2011.  Annual employee performance evaluations address employee goals (On going).  Promote personal development, safety training, and career training as well as cross training. (Ongoing). Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Host Navajo County Quarterly Road Safety Committee Meeting – the Committee will meet quarterly to report road maintenance progress and safety issues. The Committee makes recommendations to improve the road maintenance reporting and execution. Attendees include staff from the Sheriff‘s Department, NCIS, PW road yards and Risk Management. Strategic Priority: Promote the Public Health of our Citizens  Wind Turbine Ordinance – engineering providing technical review for sound complaints. (Ongoing). Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Asphalt Concrete Overlay - prepare a five year schedule for overlays based on the road‘s pavement preservation data. Finalized plans to be provided annually on or before February each year. Currently working in finalizing 2011 plan year.  Slurry Seal / Chip Seal - prepare a five year schedule for slurry seal / chip seal based on the road‘s pavement preservation data. Finalized plans to be provided annually on or before February each year. Currently working in finalizing 2011 plan year.  Develop quality control program (monitoring and testing procedures) for testing contracted materials (gravel, striping, asphalt concrete, asphalt oils, etc.) for compliance to Navajo County material specifications by April 2011. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  RAC Grants – Preparing grant applications to the Forest Service for funding roadway and drainage improvements for Forest Service roads. Application due at the end of March. 170 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Hilltop Improvement District – Bid and construct paving improvement by September 2011.  Chevelon Creek Bridge - Working with Arizona Department of Transportation to obtain additional Bridge Rehabilitation funding by May 2011.  Woodruff-Snowflake Bridge - Working with Arizona Department of Transportation to obtain additional Bridge Rehabilitation funding by July 2011.  RAC Grant projects to be completed by October 2011; Burton Road chip seal, 2.5 miles; gravel Black Canyon Road (FS 86) gravel, 1 mile; and Fools Hallow Lake State Park pavement repairs.  Lone Pine Dam Road Bridge - Work with Arizona Department of Transportation Construction Management to minimize Change Orders and keep the project moving forward towards the target completion date of March 2012. FISCAL/CONTRACTS/GIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 NCIS Improvements: Completed 40% topology/parcel editing in December of 2010. Fiscal Year 2011 NCIS enhancements for Public Works, Flood Control and Assessors include: The ability to better manage respective NCIS functions, allow ―real-time‖ processes, create highway/signs subdivisions, improve Highway Work Reporting, streamline Fleet data input, streamline the building permit process, generate and automate flood control maintenance; and automate and import GPS data and improve public web mapping – 50% is estimated to be completed by June 30, 2011. NCIS Support:  GIS staff has provided support in the day-to-day functionalities of the NCIS System and have worked with the Information Technology Department and/or TerraGenesis to resolve system response time and server down time. Purchasing of Materials/Supplies/Contracts:  Purchasing of materials/supplies has been completed within 24 to 48 hours. Standard yearly contracts have been bid and/or extended with no or minimal lapse time between contract periods. Cross Training:  Account clerk has cross-trained invoice processing with the GIS Analyst, P-Card process will be cross-trained by June 30, 2011. NCIS Opportunities for County Divisions:  GIS staff coordinated with TerraGenesis and the Assessor‘s Office ―City Road‖ additions – completed August 2010; coordinated address/zoning updates on public web – completed April, 2010; New map display for the web – completed December, 2010. GIS staff also coordinated various Animal Control updates with TerraGenesis – completed August 2010. 171 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Continue to improve the GIS parcel database for internal/external customers by 40% – June 2012.  Continue to improve and enhance the NCIS database to provide efficient and accurate information to the end users (e.g., zoning information, road maintenance tracking & reporting, Fleet Management, etc.) by meeting quarterly with the end users – June 2012.  Develop a mechanism to minimize redundant data entry for E911 by automating GIS/Auto Cad entries – February 2012. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue to improve the public works budget process by forecasting a two year budget, etc. – May 2011 & May 2012.  Provide and review budget reports for the Public Works Deputy Directors – Quarterly.  Keep standard contracts up-to-date (no or minimal lapse from year-to-year) – (On going).  Complete fiscal year 2011 ―Year End‖ reporting for capital improvement projects, supplies Inventory, federal grant programs, and road adds/deletes by September 2011.  Convert to 100% use of P-cards for purchasing. FLEET OPERATIONS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Developed new Navajo County Information System (NCIS) utilization reports for identifying and tracking vehicles and equipment usage.  Completed infrastructure improvement by enclosing the existing wash rack at the Holbrook Auto Shop to provide a suitable controlled environment for cleaning vehicles throughout the year to eliminate inclement weather, wind and freezing temperature downtimes.  Continued to support equipment partnership projects with the Navajo Nation.  Reevaluated and implemented changes to Show Low Road Yard Shop operations to improve communications and effectiveness.  Suspended Waste Tire Tipping Fees for all tire classes except OTRs (large equipment tires greater than 25‖ in diameter).  Worked with the Deputy Director of Highways to develop a five-year equipment replacement plan based on priority equipment needs for projected projects.  Successfully continued to keep our county fleet performing at high levels despite the third consecutive year of no vehicle replacements due to budgetary restraints and cutbacks. 172 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  To establish efficient and effective county fleet services by providing customers with safe, reliable, economical, environmentally sound transportation and related services that are responsive to the needs of the customer groups, and that conserve vehicle value and equipment investment.  Continue to promote employee excellence through annual performance evaluations.  Infrastructure development at Show Low Rd Yd Shop-enclose the north exterior end of the shop to create a welding and fabrication area that will improve the air quality and reduce the noise level within the main shop. It will also enable creating an equipment engine/transmission rebuild area where the welding and fabrication work is presently performed. This will enable us to better utilize the talents and skills of our trained mechanics and reduce equipment repair/ rebuild outsourcing, saving money.  Construct cinder spreader hangers with existing materials already purchased and consolidate cinder spreaders from outlying areas (Pinetop & Taylor Rd Yards) to provide better and more cost effective access to the equipment. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Develop a five-year equipment replacement plan based on equipment condition, maintenance and repair costs and the Deputy Director of Highways recommended equipment priorities.  Reduce overall fleet operating costs by recommending reduction and/or reassignment of vehicles that are currently being underutilized by county departments.  Provide fleet data reports to county departments to aid in budgeting and decision making processes.  Provide a fleet utilization report twice a year.  Consider used equipment purchases in lieu of new equipment when viable.  Continue to maintain the integrity of an aging fleet of equipment and vehicles with limited replacement due to budget constraints. HIGHWAYS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 2010 Storm Damage:  January of 2010 Navajo County received record amounts of snow. With the amount of moisture that fell during the storm caused major problems with our road system. We had a total of 192.5 miles of road that was damaged with 80.2 miles of roads that had to be re-graveled. It has taken all year to fix the damages. We have submitted $663,147 to ADEM/FEMA for reimbursement and should receive 90% which will be approximately $596,832. 173 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued Bourdon Ranch Overlay:  Bourdon Ranch Road overlay was funded with stimulus monies. We had to have the road crack sealed and patched, before the contractor could overlay the 3.2 miles of roadway. This project took several divisions to accomplish. We had to qualify for the funding, then we had to work with FHWA and ADOT and with Granite Construction. We had to make sure that there were no overages because there was no money to pay for it, so we worked with all parties involved and finished the project under budget. Scott‘s Pine Drainage:  Scott‘s Pine Meadows drainage project took a lot of planning between Flood Control, Engineering and the road yard to make this project a success. We installed two 3x8 box culverts under Pine Dawn Road in the Wagon Wheel area to minimize the flooding in that area. The Navajo Nation Projects:  During the major storms we had the opportunity to go up and help the citizens of the nation. We hauled water, food, wood and coal, to many of the Chapter Houses on the reservation. We crushed red dog material for ten Chapter Houses, and we helped NDOT with the stockpiling of the materials. This is a joint project with Navajo County, Apache County and Navajo Department of Transportation. Mountain View Road Improvement District:  The home owners along Mountain View Drive and West Settler Drive formed an improvement district to have their roads paved. We had to move West Settler road to the north and install new culverts under the road, and along Mountain View road we replaced the cross culverts under the road and fixed the road side drainage. We prepared both road surfaces for the asphalt that would be put down by Hatch Construction. This project turned out to be very successful for all that was involved. Hutch Road Low Water Crossing:  This project was necessary so the people that live on the other side of the canyon can get out after a major flood. It provides them access to their property and homes sooner now. The project took several agencies to accomplish from Flood Control to Engineer Department to the road yard and we also used forces from Buildings and Grounds. 174 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued RAC Grant Projects:  We were involved in four separate projects with the RAC Grants. The first project we did was with the Forest Service in the Pinetop area. They received a grant to put Class 6 AB on Forest Service road 182, which we helped them with a motor grader, a roller and one water truck. They had a contractor haul the material in and we helped them lay and compact the material. The second project in that area was the 9600T road which is used as an escape route for the Pinetop Country Club. We hauled the material in and laid it down, compacted the road surface and watered it too. The project was approximately 2.3 miles long. The third project was a double chip seal on Porter Mountain road. We had to haul in material and reshape the road and we put down some magnesium chloride and lignum for a stabilizer for the road base. Then we did a double chip seal on the project. The last project was also a double chip seal on the Pinedale Road. We hauled in material and reshaped the road and we put down magnesium chloride and lignum for a stabilizer for the road base. Then we did a double chip seal on the project. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Improve on work order repairs.  Improve on maintenance schedules. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility   Develop a five year plan, by prioritized road name, to provide the following:  10 miles of overlay per year.  35 miles of slurry seal per year.  100 miles of crack seal per year. Quarterly review of Maintenance activity:  PW level.  Foreman level. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Gravel N9065, N8073, N4.  Complete Red Dog Crushing and Hauling. 175 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 OFFICE ADMINISTRATION ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Support Public Works divisions.  Established and maintained effective working relationships with public, employees and other local and tribal agencies. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Complete office administration cross-training for all offices (Holbrook, Show Low and Heber) by December 2011.  Update procedures manual (instructions for office functions) to include new processes in NCIS and New World which will be available at all locations by December 2011.  Organize and implement a filing system in the records room in Holbrook which will abide with the records retention schedule and fully utilize NCIS for records search by June 2012.  Work to provide office coverage at all locations, through June 2012.  Annual employee performance evaluations and address employee goals. PLANNING AND ZONING ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Maintained same day inspection services.  Continued to streamline and improve processes, forms, and reports.  Fee Changes: Adoption of a revised fee schedule which provides for an increase in planning, zoning & building fees based on services provided.  Completed the adoption of an Alternative Energy (Wind) Ordinance.  Completed updates to the Navajo County comprehensive plan.  Navajo County Information System (NCIS): Initiated NCIS-driven permit system.  Website: Began regular updates to department info for meeting, public notices, permits, forms, etc.  Successful adoption of snow load criteria for manufactured homes.  Zoning Maps: Revised and replaced all parcel maps – worked on full implementation with NCIS.  Storm of January, 2010: Assessed damage to structures and assistance with cataloging of damage. 176 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Manufactured Homes in Holbrook: Took over installation and inspection services for all manufactured homes within the City of Holbrook. Required a new IGA with the [State of Arizona] Office of Manufactured Housing.  Medical Marijuana: Began process for adoption of an ordinance regulating dispensaries and cultivation areas.  Reduction in Force: Eliminated two positions (one in Planning and one in Building), along with subsequent reorganization of duties.  Major Projects: Dry Lake II, Wind Ordinance, Younger Ranch, Show Low Mountain Ranch, SemStream, Medical Marijuana, Fees, Snow Load Criteria.  Planning: Processed 51 applications affecting approximately 240,500 acres and consisting of:  12 – Special Use Permits (including Dry Lake II).  4 – Text Amendments (including Wind Ordinance).  4 – Re-zonings (including Younger Ranch).  1 – Comprehensive Plan Amendment.  1 – Area Plan (Aztec).  11 – Temporary RV permits.  1 – Assurance Agreement.  2 – Use Permits.  4 – Special Event Permits.  2 – Site Plans/Amendments.  7 – Variances.  2 – Tentative Plat Amendments.  Building Permits: Issued 1,168 permits.  Building Inspections: Conducted 2,900 inspections. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Implement zoning maps to be fully available through NCIS & Assessor‘s Office for better availability to the public complete by December 31, 2011.  Update and revise the addenda to the building code to reflect current and accepted construction practices. Complete by December 31, 2011. 177 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Provide same-day/24-hour inspection services – provide monthly report.  Continue to provide for more website-based information, forms, etc. (On going).   Permit activity for previous month  Applications & Forms  Public notices Continue to streamline processes to expedite applications, requests and projects. (On going). Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Complete the update & revise the Addenda to the Building Code to reflect current and accepted construction practices. Complete by December 31st, 2011. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue to staff all Building Department offices to serve the diverse geography of Navajo County.  Monitor and track permit and inspection requests to better allocate resources and review trends. Provide monthly reports.  Continue to review processes to reduce costs and eliminate unnecessary processes and expenses.  Complete consolidate files and records – integrate into NCIS (use of intern) by December 31st, 2011. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  Adoption of Updates to the Comprehensive Plan (including Aztec Area Plan & Transportation Plans). Complete by December 31, 2011. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Review notification processes to enhance community outreach and participation. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW Planning & Zoning had no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE) over 2011. Changes in FTE's in 2010 and 2011 where caused by a decrease in building permits, inspections and needs of the public resulting in the need for fewer positions Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Planning & Zoning FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 16.50 16.50 7.25 5.65 5.50 Planning & Zoning Total 16.50 16.50 7.25 5.65 5.50 178 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. Due to the decline in the economy there has been a decrease in planning & zoning fees, building permits, inspections, on-call duties to the public, etc., that has therefore decreased the overall General Fund budget by 9.72%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 436,629 $ 423,306 Special Revenue - - Balance Forward - - Total Sources $ 375,423 $ 382,169 -9.72% N/A (19,444) - N/A $ 436,629 $ 423,306 $ 355,979 $ 382,169 -9.72% $ 393,104 $ 341,680 $ 320,649 $ 326,190 -4.53% Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ $ 9,899 13,976 10,137 12,023 -13.97% 33,626 67,650 25,193 43,956 -35.02% - - - - N/A -9.72% 436,629 - $ $ 423,306 - $ $ 355,979 - $ $ 382,169 - N/A 179 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 FLOOD CONTROL ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Maintain same day service for parcel reviews.  Worked with FEMA in support of revising the DFIRM‘s to reflect unshaded X zone in place of current D zone.  Completed construction on Scotts Pine Meadow drainage improvement project.  Convert all flood request reviews to an all electronic format in order to perform the core flood control activity in the most effective and efficient way possible.  Implemented erosion control for 1,300 ft of bank on Winslow Levee.  Continued working on Feasibility Study and completed aerial photography/mapping for Winslow levee Feasibility Study Area. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Maintain same day service for parcel reviews & report out monthly. Improve our process of logging and responding to drainage and flooding complaints through NCIS. July, 2011 Strategic Priority: Provide Ensure Safe Communities  Bring county ALERT system back to functioning at 100% by July 2011.  Work toward completing the F3 ―Without Project Conditions Report‖ for the Winslow Feasibility Study by June 2012. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens  Work with IT to improve the website material pertaining to flood control. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Develop a process using NCIS for scheduling and tracking maintenance of flood control owned structures and properties by November 2011. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  When possible implement Low Impact Development policy by requiring that floodplains remain open space during project reviews. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Work with NWS & USGS to develop flood stages for gages on the Little Colorado River by November 2011. 180 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 FLOOD CONTROL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Work toward completing more local drainage improvements in residential neighborhoods.  Pinetop Country Club (Elk Drive)  Lee Reese Drive  Sky High Retreat  Black Canyon Wash bank stabilization DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Navajo Co. Flood Control Dist. FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget Flood Control District 3.05 3.00 4.00 3.70 3.75 Flood Control District Total 3.05 3.00 4.00 3.70 3.75 181 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: The overall budget increased by 23.11%. The Flood Control District revenues increased to anticipated revenues from the federal level to assist with the Winslow Levee. The fiscal year 2010-11 allocation for Restoration to Competency & Violent Sex Offender costs has been removed for the fiscal year 2011-12. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources Flood Control Revenue LCR Flood Control District Revenue Balance Forward Total Sources 2,351,894 1,868,034 2,186,525 3,211,811 115,170 109,692 107,203 118,018 71.94% 7.59% 6,940,933 8,834,055 8,598,367 9,980,027 12.97% $ 9,407,998 $ 10,811,781 $ 10,892,095 $ 13,309,856 23.11% $ 244,284 $ 247,686 $ 220,955 $ 245,236 -0.99% Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay 3,028 4,928 3,814 5,235 6.23% 428,388 3,490,662 227,692 1,389,176 -60.20% 11,670,209 65.10% 23.11% 150,182 7,068,505 $ 825,881 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 257,429 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 8,839,545 $ - Total Uses 10,811,781 459,607 $ $ 912,068 9,980,027 $ 13,309,856 $ - N/A $ - N/A * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. Navajo County Flood Control District $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Personal Services Supplies 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $244,284 $247,686 $220,955 $245,236 3,028 4,928 3,814 5,235 Professional Services 428,388 2,779,901 227,692 1,389,176 Capital Outlay 150,182 7,068,505 459,607 11,670,209 Total Navajo County Flood Control District $825,881 $10,101,020 $912,068 $13,309,856 182 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 Navajo County Code Enforcement closed over 200 code violation cases in 2010 by the owners bringing their properties into acceptable compliance. Most of these cases resulted from repeated phone calls, site visits, and mailed notices to the property owners. Of the ten hearing cases listed below, six were brought into acceptable compliance during or shortly after the hearing process. Navajo County is continuing to work with the remaining property owners to bring their properties into compliance. 183 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Navajo County Code Enforcement continues to strive to improve customer service.  Return all calls during same business day when possible.  Respond to new complaints with initial site visit within 1 business day when possible.  When a code complaint property is unoccupied, mail a notice of inspection to the property owner within 24 hours of inspection.  If code complaint property is occupied by a renter or tenant, mail a notice of inspection to the property owner within 24 hours of inspection in addition to posting the property and/or giving a notice of inspection to the tenant (if present).  Follow up after 7 days, if owner has not responded to mailing.  Complete consent agreement with owner stating agreed deadline for compliance.  Utilize NCIS to track site visits and follow up site visits.  The Navajo County Code Enforcement committee meets on a regular basis to review open cases and provide recommendations on a course of action for non-compliant property owners. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Develop progress reports in NCIS that will measure work flow by June 2011. Strategic Priority: Provide Ensure Safe Communities  Improve compliance rate for correcting zoning violations and closing the complaint file by February 2012. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Bring closure to zoning complaint files that have been open longer than one year by February 2012.  Work with Planning & Zoning Director to amend portion of Ordinance that pertains to RV‘s by June 2012. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of Our Citizens  Work with IT to improve the website material pertaining to Code Enforcement. Ongoing Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Partner with ADEQ to and other local agencies to complete a neighborhood cleanup project by October 2011. 184 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). The increase in Public Works of 1.85 was due to moves from Waste Tire Disposal and Flood Control. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Public Works Public Works FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget 89.75 Waste Tire Disposal Program Public Works Total FY 10 Budget 87.50 FY 11 Budget 78.00 FY 12 Budget 77.65 79.50 0.00 3.00 3.25 3.25 2.25 89.75 90.50 81.25 80.90 81.75 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: Although the Highway User Revenue Fund is anticipating a loss due to state impacts, other revenue sources are expected to have minor increases, thus accounting for the 14.86% increase. The overall budget for this department has decreased by 10.62%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources Public Works Revenue $ 11,015,896 $ 9,813,434 $ 11,030,960 $ 11,271,661 14.86% Special Revenue 3,843,451 465,527 441,153 468,503 0.64% Balance Forward 6,851,427 12,125,459 11,691,191 8,283,822 -31.68% Total Sources $ 21,710,774 $ 22,404,420 $ 23,163,304 $ 20,023,986 -10.62% $ 4,438,268 $ 4,679,512 $ 4,387,131 $ 4,684,154 0.10% Uses Personal Services Supplies 1,158,880 1,197,339 1,236,409 1,252,583 4.61% Professional Services 1,468,719 3,317,803 1,992,902 5,543,633 67.09% 8,543,616 -35.32% -10.62% Capital Outlay 2,809,810 13,209,766 $ 9,875,678 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 625,660 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 12,460,757 $ - Total Uses 22,404,420 * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 7,263,040 $ $ 14,879,482 8,283,822 $ 20,023,986 $ - N/A $ - N/A 185 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y PUBLIC WORKS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW 186 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 County Recorder Chief Deputy County Recorder Voter Registration Coordinator Elections Director Elections Coordinator Elections Worker & Voter Registration Assistant Voter Outreach Assistant Voter Outreach Assistant Data Input Specialist (2) Data Input Specialist MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Recorder‘s Office is to provide the best customer service by maintaining a perpetual, comprehensive set of public records consisting of all documents appropriately presented for recording for the public so that any member of the public can readily access the information to conduct personal and business activities with the assurance that, where appropriate, privacy will be protected and transactions will be executed in accordance with the law. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Recorder‘s Office is comprised of the recording division which includes voter registration, voter outreach and early voting. Responsibilities in the Recorder‘s Office include processing and creating a public record of all documents received in a timely manner, and to ensure that all records are easily accessible to the public. Documents include real estate transactions, mortgages, deeds of trust, family trusts, personal property, tax liens, mining locations, subdivision plats, records of survey, military discharges, official appointments of office, and other documents required to be made of public record. Public records are also maintained on microfilm according to national archival standards. By statute the Recorder‘s office is also in charge of voter registration which includes voter outreach and early voting. Voter information is disseminated through our voter outreach program. The recorder, as registrar of voters, is responsible for maintaining voter records and conducting early voting with accuracy and consistency in accordance with Federal and State requirements. Our office works diligently to accomplish all duties in an atmosphere filled with courtesy, consideration and respect. The Elections Department was placed under the supervision of the Recorder in 2011 as directed by the Board of Supervisors. 187 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  We have satellite offices in Kayenta, Pinon and Whiteriver which are staffed once a month.  Installed official drop off boxes for early ballots at 5 different locations in the county which has reduced the cost of postage and given the citizens of Navajo County another secure way to drop off their voted ballot.  Recorded 24,167 documents from January 1 through December 31, 2010.  Recorded 13,582 electronic recordings out of the 24,167 above which reduced the cost of postage.  Applied and was accepted by the US Postal Service to mail out election related materials at a non- profit rate, saving the county money in postage costs.  Have transferred 14,143 voters to the permanent early voting list.  We have a total of 58,083 active and 6,310 inactive voters registered.  Developed a policies and procedures book for recording so that cross training of staff will be more efficient.  The clean up of the cancelled voter registration file is 90% complete.  Cleaned up the subdivision list of plats and surveys.  Provided voter education through radio and newspapers, as well as public meetings, including chapter meetings, senior citizen centers, nursing homes and high schools.  Conducted several voter registration drives at fairs, flea markets, satellite locations, chapter meetings and various other places throughout the county.  Established 18 early voting sites throughout the county. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  Continue expanding on our electronic recording customers by welcoming anyone who is eligible under A.R.S. 11-461.C which states that a title insurer or title insurance agent as defined in section 20-1562, by a state chartered or federally chartered bank insured by the federal deposit insurance corporation, by an active member of the state bar of Arizona, by an agency, branch or instrumentality of the federal government, a trusted submitter or by a governmental entity…This means your office could be eligible.  Continue redacting sensitive information daily on every new document we receive that can be seen on the web. By doing this task daily our documents are kept current and free from sensitive information. 188 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Continue to educate our voters through our voter outreach program, which consists of using radio and newspaper ads as well as giving presentations to different groups throughout the county, in order to transfer voters who wish to be placed on the Permanent Early Voting List.  Will have staff certified and re-certified in elections through the Secretary of State‘s certification program by the end of fiscal year 2011-12.  Continue working with Secretary of State‘s office on implementing enhancements to our statewide voter registration system to improve voter registration and polling place elections.  Continue disseminating voter information and election materials through our voter outreach program by attending registration drives, attending chapter meetings and visiting schools.  Work on developing a policies and procedures book for voter registration so that cross training of staff will be more efficient. First draft expected to be complete in 6 months.  Start working on an inventory of old record books and cancelled voter registration cards so that they may be transferred to the State Library and Archives for permanent storage. 20% to be completed by in fiscal year 2011-12.  Continue cross training staff in recordings, voter registration and outreach departments.  Conduct a mass mailing to our voters after the redistricting is complete.  Work on adding more information to our website, such as upcoming election material, voter outreach program, translations in Spanish on voting materials and more FAQ‘s materials for both recordings and voting. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Apply to Secretary of State to use Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Funds in order to upgrade equipment in voter registration. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue working with Apache and Coconino counties to share ideas in order to be more effective in our outreach program. We meet at least every three months or when needed. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW In prior years the Recorder and Voter Registration have been reported separately. Since the function of both are overseen by the County Recorder, they are combined for the purposes of this presentation. There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Recorder/Voter Registration FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 Document Storage 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Recorder Total 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 189 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: In prior years the Recorder and Voter Registration have been reported separately. Since the function of both are overseen by the County Recorder, they are combined for the purposes of this presentation. General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The overall budget for this department decreased by 1.45%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 410,086 Balance Forward Total Sources 361,711 484,172 $ 190,939 115,834 378,965 $ 95,363 53,563 65,647 498,292 2.92% 170,326 -10.80% 49,458 -7.66% $ 887,631 $ 728,674 $ 539,975 $ 718,076 -1.45% $ 368,856 $ 429,222 $ 402,535 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay 409,170 -4.67% 13,446 26,500 16,443 26,000 -1.89% 165,069 255,404 69,142 258,406 1.18% 3,216 17,548 2,397 24,500 39.62% -1.45% $ 550,587 $ Accounting Adjustment* $ (156,029) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 181,015 $ - Total Uses 728,674 * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. $ $ 490,517 49,458 $ 718,076 $ - N/A $ - N/A 190 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 ELECTIONS MISSION STATEMENT Navajo County Elections, under the direction of the County Recorder, administers, prepares, conducts and tallies federal, state and county elections in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION  The elections office is responsible for coordinating and administering all elections:  Securing polling place locations.  Recruiting, hiring and training of election board workers.  Issuing, accepting and maintaining candidate, initiative, referendum and recall filings and campaign committee financial reports.  Provides for printing of all election related material.  Establishes election precinct boundaries.  Secures use of facilities for election day.  Prepares, allocates and transports election materials to and from polling places.  Provides vote tabulation and official results for canvassing by the Board of Supervisors.  Provide outreach services to the Navajo, Hopi and Apache Tribes. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Successfully conducted one (1) jurisdictional, three (3) county-wide elections and a county wide recount of a state proposition.  Followed new security procedures and streamlined the new audit trail forms.  Brought the remaining working special districts up to compliance.  Took an active part with the Secretary of State‘s office to implement a state-wide automatic recount.  Reduced the number of poll workers used in fiscal year 2007-08 by 18%, saving the county approximately $12,200.00. 191 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  To offer set hours at the satellite office in Indian Wells in order to provide outreach service to the community and surrounding areas on a more consistent basis.  To continue to provide consistent and dependable outreach services to the Navajo, Hopi and Apache communities. We plan on providing a monthly schedule to the different communities so that people can count on our outreach to be there on the designated days.  To have all staff complete the State Election Certification/Re-Certification program.  To continue to participate with other departments to complete the mapping program with GIS so that detailed maps of precincts and districts will be available on the internet.  To continue to attend community meetings and functions on a monthly basis. Plan on a using the City and Town‘s Council meetings as an opportunity to bring public awareness to the new election laws and procedures that will be in place for the 2012 Presidential Preference Election.  To continue to educate ourselves with the ever changing election laws and procedures in order to better inform the community by attending the yearly AACo and EOA (Election Officials Association) meetings and being involved with the legislative process.  To prepare our poll workers for the upcoming 2012 elections by offering a County Wide Premium Certification Training to all current and future poll workers. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  To continue to program and design our own election databases which will save a substantial amount to the General Fund. By taking on this responsibility we will save the county approximately $18,000.00 for every county-wide consolidated election that we conduct.  To continue to cut cost wherever possible by shopping around and being more efficient in the way we conduct our daily business, by doing so this will eliminate the need for additional staffing.  To apply for non-profit status with the United States Postal Service so that all required mailings are done at a much reduced rate.  To maintain an equipment tracking and maintenance program that also tracks the chain of custody of all electronic election equipment. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  To continue to work with the Navajo and Hopi Election Administrations by attending the yearly Summit and tri-monthly meetings.  To work closer with the Tribal leaders and to be compassionate to their needs. Plan on having outreach worker attend monthly chapter meetings, fairs, rodeo‘s and other social functions where the community gathers. We will meet quarterly to discuss feedback and any action items that need addressed. 192 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW The reduction of one Full Time Equivalent's (FTE) is due to a cut in funding for voter outreach. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source FY 08 Budget Elections FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Elections Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. There is a significant decrease in the General Fund budget since this is a non-election year. There is however, an overall increase in the Special Revenue budget. This is due to an expecting increase in grant funding. The overall budget for this department decreased by 7.68%, of that, the General Fund budget decreased by 28.78%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopte d Budge t 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopte d Budge t % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue Balance Forw ard Total Sources 235,884 448,090 -28.78% 206,664 $ 629,174 213,835 $ 496,067 25,245 $ 306,605 43.38% 55,902 183,873 183,998 193,318 5.14% $ 498,450 $ 1,026,882 $ 705,310 $ 948,013 -7.68% $ 178,863 $ 222,664 $ 200,063 $ 203,171 -8.75% Uses Personal Services Supplies Prof essional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses 15,554 231,555 13,789 251,017 8.40% 108,541 472,663 285,465 459,159 -2.86% 34,666 -65.33% -7.68% 1,285 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 304,244 (3,791) 190,415 100,000 $ 1,026,882 $ - $ - 12,675 $ $ * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. 511,992 193,318 $ 948,013 $ - N/A $ - N/A 193 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y RECORDER/VOTER REGISTRATION/ELECTIONS FY 2011-12 General Fund Expenditures $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Personal Services 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $178,863 $222,664 $200,063 $203,171 Supplies 7,374 21,100 11,030 34,387 Professional Services 49,647 385,410 284,974 210,532 - - - - $235,884 $629,174 $496,067 $448,090 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 194 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 SHERIFF CHIEF DEPUTY SHERIFF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DETECTIVE (3) DIST 1 LIEUTENANT SERGEANT SERGEANT DIST 2 LIEUTENANT SERGEANT SERGEANT SERGEANT SERGEANT DEPUTY SHERIFF II (4) DEPUTY SHERIFF II (4) DEPUTY SHERIFF II (4) DEPUTY SHERIFF I DEPUTY SHERIFF II (6) DEPUTY SHERIFF II (3) DEPUTY SHERIFF I (3) DEPUTY SHERIFF I DEPUTY SHERIFF II (4) DEPUTY SHERIFF CADET 195 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 SHERIFF CHIEF DEPUTY SHERIFF DISPATCH/COMM SUPV DISPATCH/COMM SPEC (4) LEAD DISPATCH COMM SPEC- LEAD DISPATCH COMM SPEC DISPATCH/COMM SPEC (3) DISPATCH/COMM SPEC (3) LIEUTENANT MCAT/HIDTA DIVISION COMMANDER SERGEANT EVIDENCE CUSTODIAN SECRETARY DIVISION COMMANDER SECRETARY ACCOUNT CLERK SENIOR RECORDS CLERK SERGEANT DEPUTY SHERIFF I DEPUTY SHERIFF II (4) CRIMINAL ANALYST MISSION STATEMENT We, the employees of the Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office, commit to providing all individuals a safe environment using innovative techniques and resources while being sensitive to the needs of each community. We will respond in a timely manner with respect, dignity and compassion when called upon. We will make all decisions based on the highest ethical and moral standards and will accept responsibility for our actions. 196 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Sheriff of Navajo County is an elected position with powers exercised under common law, except in so far as it has been modified by constitutional and statutory provisions. The powers of the Sheriff are delegated to employees of the Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office in order to fulfill the requirements as established by law. The powers and duties of the Sheriff are to preserve the peace; prevent all affrays, breaches of the peace, riots and insurrections; attend all courts, except justice and police; take charge and keep the county jail; endorse all process and notices; serve process and notices; secure the home of a deceased person until heirs or executor has been determined; command as many inhabitants of the county as the Sheriff deems necessary in the execution of his duties; conduct and coordinate search and rescue operations involving the life or health of any person; request the aid of volunteer posse and reserve organizations; assist other counties at the request of their Sheriff; cause prisoners who are on work release to reimburse the county. The Sheriff has adopted the Incident Command System (I.C.S.) and the National Incident Management System (N.I.M.S.) as the standard by which all events, incidents and disasters will be managed within his jurisdiction. The Navajo County Board of Supervisors with concurrence of the Sheriff adopted, in open public session, the I.C.S. and N.I.M.S. on May 2, 2005. The Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office is divided into four divisions overseen by command staff. The divisions are Detention, Support, Special Services and Operations. The command staff supervises 168 positions which include certified peace officers, certified detention officers and support positions. The main headquarters of the Sheriff‘s Office is located at 137 West Arizona in Holbrook. The detention facility is located at 100 East Carter in Holbrook. Six substations are located in Kayenta, Pinetop, Show Low, Heber-Overgaard, Winslow and Taylor with the Holbrook substation operating out of headquarters. The Navajo County Operations Division is divided into two patrol districts and consists of 35 certified personnel and 10 dispatch personnel. The deputies respond to calls in the unincorporated areas of Navajo County in addition to providing assistance to the cities and reservations within the county as requested. The County‘s population swells in the summer months as summer residents return to the cooler temperatures of the White Mountains. In addition, the ski season brings in visitors and seasonal residents. Both seasonal population increases add to the call load of the deputies. The Criminal Investigation Unit is comprised of three detectives and one sergeant detective. The detectives respond to all major crimes within the Sheriff‘s Office jurisdiction to include identity theft, sexual assaults, robberies, burglaries, thefts, aggravated assaults, homicides, suicides, suspicious deaths, arson, child abuse, and fraud. Each detective is certified as a forensic interviewer for child crimes; in addition the sergeant detective is a certified arson investigator. The Major Crimes Apprehension Team (MCAT) is a multi-agency task force of which the Sheriff‘s Office is the host agency. The task force is comprised of seven detectives, three canine handlers, two sergeants and one lieutenant, one criminal analyst, and one secretary assigned to the unit. 197 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION continued The unit currently operates with two squads, one is located in Holbrook and the other unit is located in Show Low. The MCAT team main focus is drug enforcement but also assists all agencies in Navajo County when called upon. Detectives conduct surveillance, conduct undercover activities, purchase illegal drugs, draft and execute search warrants and apprehend individuals in our communities that are promoting illegal activity. The MCAT Team routinely works Domestic Highway Enforcement Details resulting in large seizures of illegal drugs and currency that is identified as ill gotten gains. The funding source for MCAT is the Bryne Memorial Fund Grant and our efforts have been recognized by both state and federal agencies for its accomplishments. From January, 2010 through March 2011 Major Crimes Detectives have recovered the following quantities of illegal drugs within Navajo County. Drug Type Quantity Street Value Heroin 23.4 lbs $ 348,876.00 Methamphetamine 17.4 lbs $ 151,773.00 Cocaine 50.7 lbs $ 742,732.00 Marijuana 163 lbs $ 557,603.00 Cash Assets $ 564,125.00 Other assets $ 191,819.00 The Support Division is comprised of the training section and administrative support staff operating out of headquarters at 137 West Arizona in Holbrook. The administrative clerical staff is responsible for accounts payable, account receivable, human resources and department criminal records. The Civil Deputies are responsible by statute to serve all process out of the Superior Court in the county, including criminal subpoenas, civil subpoenas, civil summons, writs of restitution, writs of execution, child custody papers and child support documents. In addition the civil deputies issue licenses to pawn shops in the county and collect delinquent personal and business property taxes. The Special Services Division oversees the Sheriff‘s Auxiliary Volunteers which are comprised of five units: District I Unit, Cedar-Hills Unit, White Mountain Lake Unit, Heber-Overgaard Unit, Pinedale-Claysprings Unit and High Country Unit. This division also coordinates four volunteer posses: Hashknife Sheriff‘s Posse, County Mounties, Heber-Overgaard Search and Rescue and White Mountain Sheriff‘s Posse. The Full Authority Peace Officer Reserve program, evidence management and fleet maintenance also fall under this division. 198 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Staffed the Kayenta Sheriff‘s Office providing a full time deputy who is cross deputized for the Navajo Reservation.  Twelve deputies attended BIA mandatory three-day training in preparation for pending tribal acceptance.  Final stages of Northland Pioneer College reserve academy accomplished; MOU has been drafted and waiting acceptance from the stake holders.  Re-established patrol reserve program and have recruited two full time deputies from the program.  Re-organized civil division now assuming more responsibilities including patrol, pawn detail and delinquent tax collection thereby increasing the presence of deputies in the outlying communities.  Funded with non-general fund money Leads Online software for every pawn broker and law enforcement agency and provided regional training to enhance the ability to monitor trafficking of stolen property enabling the recovery of over $30,000.  Assigned a civil deputy with primary responsibilities to monitor and audit the pawn program.  Obtained HIDTA (High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas) designation which funds two positions and additional overtime which will enable us to be more proactive in our drug interdiction efforts.  Navajo County‘s first honor guard unit established with donations and fund raisers. The unit has been able to represent the county at numerous memorials across the state and will attend the National Peace Officer Memorial in Washington, DC through donations and fund raisers.  Improved our intelligence lead policing by using Leads Online, NCSO monthly reports and crimereports.com which have resulted in reduced response time making NCSO more efficient in solving crime within Navajo County.  Increased our enforcement and investigative capabilities by purchasing radars, stop sticks, in-car cameras, taser shotguns, ballistic shields, video recorders, intoxilyzers and lap-top computers with non-general fund monies.  Rotated positions creating career enhancement opportunities and cross training for management positions.  Two additional K-9s were purchased with donated funds.  One addition deputy position was added using a Rural Law Enforcement grant.  One addition K-9 equipped vehicle purchased with non-general fund money.  Attended numerous grant funded training for command and line staff, i.e. Leading by Legacy, Leadership training (LPO) and HIDTA Task Force supervisory training.  Successfully re-evaluated assignments by under filling positions to save general fund monies and providing improved service. 199 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11 continued  Partnered with other departments to provide radio technician services and information technology services county wide reducing general fund costs.  Used GPS on department vehicles to audit speed, increasing accountability, response time, patrol habits reflecting fuel efficiency, officer safety and liability.  Used administrative hearing fees to build vehicle impound/evidence yard at the Mogollon Complex, installed razor wire on fenced impound/evidence yard at the Taylor substation and secured Holbrook Administration building with electronic access.  Used Administrative hearing fees to purchase in-car radar and camera equipment for two patrol vehicles and installation of a third unit.  Came in under budget on general fund by 5% - 10%.  Funded overtime to alarm calls from non-general fund.  Used crime analysis data to further reduce response time in high crime areas.  Reduced response times; increased patrol availability in turn increase patrol availability.  Acquired additional K-9 for patrol activity.  Partnered with Arizona Counties Insurance Pool (ACIP) to implement new Lexipol policies thus reducing liability for the county with updated and current policies.  Implemented false alarm fees which reduced false alarm calls by approximately 30% enabling deputies to respond to other calls for service.  Added additional SWAT team member to regional unit.  Trained both the Navajo County Attorney Civil Asset Forfeiture and our Criminal Analyst in asset forfeiture sponsored by Southwest HIDTA to have the capability to investigate large scale money laundering cases that are encountered while working Domestic Highway Enforcement.  During the last year the Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office and the Navajo County Attorney‘s Office have obtained four vehicles from criminals through the asset seizure process and utilized the vehicles for both undercover operations and patrol work saving Navajo County on vehicle purchases.  Partnering with the Board of Supervisors to provide a safe environment during the meetings for the supervisors and citizens at a reduced cost to the county. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Excellent Customer Service  Modify existing technology to enhance statistical data collection for our grant funding opportunities.  Partner with county grant administrator to research grant opportunities that will enhance our analytical capabilities to improve intelligence lead policing. 200 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  Create a web based records request process enabling citizens to purchase department records online thus increasing customer service and satisfaction by June 30, 2012.  Partner with City of Holbrook to provide dispatch services for police, fire and EMS reducing costs for the city, increasing the PDs data sharing capability and creating employment opportunities.  Complete regional dispatch study in partnership with the cities, fire and EMS entities throughout Northeastern Arizona with the following phases:  Phase I – Needs assessment, Phase II – business plan, Completion based on funding by participating agencies.  Create a Facebook page for NCSO.  Expand 24-hour coverage.  Increase high visibility patrols reducing accidents, crime and the fear of crime through increase traffic enforcement activities. This will be intelligence data driven in order to focus on high areas of criminal occurrence.  Implementation of neighborhood watch programs in Silver Lake Estates, White Mountain Summer Homes, Pinetop Country Club and Linden Trails which include Sheriff‘s Office Deputy liaisons.  Education on WeTIP, CrimeReports.com, BanditTrackerArizona.com and LeadsOnline.com usage by attendance at homeowners meetings and civic group organization meetings monthly. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Continue to come in under budget and purchase capital using non-general fund monies. Annual review of general fund budget.  Research funding opportunities to reduce strain on the general fund.  Combine two clerical positions to reduce county cost of one position by 80%.  Continue to under fill positions.  Fund portion of pawn detail for deputy‘s salary, fuel, training, overtime and equipment with pawn fee funds reducing general fund liability.  Research leasing options for vehicles and associated equipment by June 30, 2012.  Evaluated and improved anniversary evaluations for consistent and fair employee evaluations  Outlined internal affairs process by combining required employee notice forms and adhering to Peace Officers Bill of Rights and county policy. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Obtain Emergency Medical Dispatch training for communications personnel ensuring that at least 50% of our dispatch staff is EMD certified. 201 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Reduction of 1.5 FTE's in General Fund is due to an Account Clerk position moved to Administration and a Radio Technician moved to Information Technologies. Changes in Special Revenue Fund FTE's is due to changes in grant funding. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source FY 08 Budget Sheriff Operations General Fund FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 69.50 64.50 66.00 66.50 65.00 Adult Victim's Rights 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Boating Safety 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Community Oriented Policing Services Meth Grant 1.80 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dispatching Local 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Department of Corrections/Bureau of Prisons Contracts 1.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 1.25 Drug Enforcement 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Emergency Services 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.50 0.50 Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement (GIITEM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 H/O School Resource Officer 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 Paw n Transaction Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 Rural Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 78.80 74.00 73.00 72.00 75.25 Sheriff Total DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The increase in the General Fund expenditur es is due mainly to increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The increase in the Special Revenue is due to implementation of new fees associated with the jail. The overall budget for this department increased by 7.76%, of that, the General Fund decreased by .89%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 490,177 Balance Forward Total Sources 4,389,735 4,998,920 $ 622,220 2,918,997 4,714,922 $ 565,330 747,379 535,718 4,954,315 -0.89% 1,577,046 153.45% 331,501 -55.64% $ 7,798,910 $ 6,368,519 $ 5,815,970 $ 6,862,862 7.76% $ 4,256,032 $ 4,913,772 $ 4,511,514 $ Uses Personal Services 5,166,021 5.13% Supplies 400,385 455,305 361,139 293,080 -35.63% Professional Services 623,809 581,188 492,744 1,149,906 97.85% Capital Outlay 347,133 418,254 119,072 253,855 -39.31% 7.76% $ 5,627,360 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ 910,393 $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 3,081,944 $ - Total Uses 6,368,519 * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. $ $ 5,484,469 331,501 $ 6,862,862 $ - N/A $ - N/A 202 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW 203 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF— JAIL FY 2011-12 Sheriff Chief Deputy Sheriff Division Commander Deputy Commander Intake & Control Sergeant Booking (2) Jail Admin. Coor. Records/SORs Visitation Inmate Support Aide Visitation Inmate Support Aide Community Services Liaison-PT Commissary Deputy Commander Facility Security Medical Administration Office Support Specialist (2) Sergeant Classification Programs Office Support Specialist Intake Control Specialist (16) Nurse Practitioner Medical Nurse Supervisor Detention Nurse (RN) (3) Detention Nurse (LPN PT) Detention Officer II Classification Detention Officer II Programs Coor Program Technician Detention Shift Supv Shift 1 Sun-Wed FTO/Detention Officer II Detention Officer II (4) Det Shift Supv Shift 2 Sun - Wed Nights Detention Officer II (6) Detention Officer I (2) Detention Officer I (3) Det Shift Supv Shift 3 Wed - Sat Days FTO/Detention Officer II Detention Officer II (5) Detention Officer I (2) Detention Nurse (LPN) (3) Det Shift Supv Shift 4 Wed - Sat Nights FTO/Detention Officer II Det Shift Supv Shift 5 Mon - Fri Days FTO/Detention Officer II Detention Officer II (3) Detention Officer II (3) Detention Officer I (3) Det Ofcr Cadet Temp reassgnmt Detention Officer Cadet Detention Shift Supv Transport Transport Officer (6) Detention Officer Cadet VACANT Nurse (LPN-Temp) Commissary Coor. Office Support Specialist MISSION STATEMENT The primary function of the detention center is to safely and securely detain both pre-trial detainees and sentenced inmates while making the inmate‘s period of stay as productive as possible. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County Adult Detention Center employs as many as 95 detention and inmate support personnel whose mission is to provide for a safer community by maintaining facility security and providing for the welfare of its staff and inmates. 204 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF— JAIL FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Certified two employees as computer voice stress analyzer specialist to enhance and streamline the hiring process.  Installed pod and booking kiosks to allow inmates easier access in ordering commissary, making medical and classification requests, checking account balances and access to inmate handbook.  Added one person to booking to streamline booking process using non-general fund money.  Partnered with the school superintendent to provide additional nursing staff for Juvenile Detention facility at no cost to the general fund.  Conducted three civilian orientation classes for clergy.  Provide inmate laborers to other municipalities at no cost.  Awarded contract to food provider reducing the cost of inmate meals to the general fund and meeting nutritional requirements.  Hosted an ADA academy partnering with Apache County, San Carlos, Graham County and graduated 20 officers.  Added a inmate recreation yard using non-general funds.  Upgraded porcelain to stainless steel toilets and sinks booking holding cells.  Installed handicap accessible toilet/sink combos in two of the holding cells commonly used for inmates with wheelchairs or severe disabilities.  Upgraded commercial dishwasher for energy efficiency using non-general fund monies.  Purchased K-9 for cell and facility searches and extractions.  Co-hosted Leadership Retreat.  Co-hosted ADA Leadership and Technology Conference.  Awarded a scholarship to Jail National Leadership & Command academy.  Command staff elected as member of the AZ Detention Association executive board.  Implemented new booking software enabling inmate photos to be added to system.  Conducted a feasibility study for out-of-state inmate extradition.  Researched cost comparison for inmate transport.  Conducted refresher Spillman training for Sergeants and Intake Control Specialist on booking procedures. 205 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF— JAIL FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Evaluate the booking process using updated technology to make the process more cost effective and efficient.  Conduct an analysis of Spillman training to ensure we‘ve realized a reduction in data entry errors, are correctly billing cities for jail fees for misdemeanor arrests and more effectively using the Spillman records management software.  Recoat four showers in one of the larger jail units. The showers in the older part of the jail were coated with a seamless hard stone-like finish polymer and have held up very well.  Covert a standard isolation cell to a ―reverse airflow‖ cell which will be used to house inmates with airborne infectious diseases. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Complete study on benefits of privatization health care for inmates to include juvenile by June 30, 2012.  Implement municipal jail fee procedures for billing collections beginning July 1, 2012.  Complete a study in a regional shuttle transport system to reduce cost of out-of-state transports by June 30, 2012.  Develop and implement block training program for Detention Officers and associated personnel by June 30, 2012 modeled after Patrol block training program.  Implement pharmaceutical cost analysis by June 30, 2012. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Federal Detention Contract decreased by 1 FTE due to the transfer of a Network Technician position to Information Technologies. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Jail Operations General Fund FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget 40.00 38.00 41.50 40.50 40.50 Adult Victim's Rights 0.67 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.49 Department of Corrections Contract 5.00 5.10 5.17 5.25 5.25 33.50 35.50 33.50 33.50 32.50 Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement (GIITEM) 1.00 0.90 0.83 0.75 0.75 Phone & Commissary 6.83 6.00 7.40 7.40 7.51 Winslow Transport 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.00 86.00 89.00 88.00 87.00 Federal Detention Contract Jail Operations Total 206 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SHERIFF— JAIL FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The decrease in the General Fund expenditures is minimal and is due to decreases in professional services. The increase in the Special Revenue budget is due to a change in reporting the Bureau of Prisons Fund (110103) In fiscal year 2010-11 it was reported under the Sheriff's Department. For the purposes of consistency in reporting the 2010 Actual and Adopted Budget have been restated to include the BOP fund. The overall budget for this department decreased by 10.42%, of that the General Fund decreased by 1.20%. 2010 Actual Am ount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Am ount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 3,334,826 Special Revenue $ 3,191,142 3,102,349 Balance Forw ard 2,423,538 Total Sources $ 2,971,387 2,424,705 $ 2,750,660 2,022,836 (570,148) 3,152,747 -1.20% 3,749,954 54.66% (60,348) -102.98% $ 8,860,714 $ 7,638,683 $ 5,151,899 $ 6,842,353 -10.42% $ 4,007,084 $ 4,308,108 $ 3,842,589 $ 4,250,054 -1.35% Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay 1,054,175 930,467 913,117 961,816 3.37% 450,078 2,258,520 442,394 1,368,461 -39.41% 262,022 85.06% -10.42% 89,653 $ Total Uses Accounting Adjustments* $ Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 5,600,990 (493,181) 2,766,543 141,588 $ 7,638,683 $ - $ - 14,147 $ 5,212,247 $ (60,348) $ 6,842,353 $ - N/A $ - N/A * A cco unting A djustments may include prio r vs. new fiscal year transitio ns and no n-recurring items. General Fund Expenditures $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget $2,188,569 $2,194,792 $2,029,747 $2,202,263 Supplies 875,717 743,600 677,266 738,084 Professional Services 270,540 252,750 264,374 212,400 - - - - $3,334,826 $3,191,142 $2,971,387 $3,152,747 Personal Services Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenditures 207 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS FY 2011-12 *Superintendent of Schools *Chief Deputy Director Education Service Agency (ESA) Administrative Assistant *School Finance Supervisor Education Specialist & Peer Coach Education Specialist *Sr. School Finance Specialist *School Finance Specialist * Navajo County Employees Principal Navajo County Accommodation District #99 Director Special Services Consortium Administrator HOPE School for Juvenile Detention & Jail Ed Program Superintendent Unorganized Territory County Staff are designated by asterisks, Non-County Personnel are under the authority of the Superintendent, however are not funded by the county. MISSION STATEMENT Continuously improving the quality of life in Navajo County through life-long learning. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION The Navajo County Education Service Agency, office of the Superintendent of Schools (NCSS) is a constitutionally created office and the County School Superintendent is an elected official. This service oriented team works to provide quality educational services throughout Navajo County. 208 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Successfully implemented a GED program for remanded students.  Created partnerships in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) throughout the county.  Opened an alternative high school, NCIS, Navajo County Instruction for Success, for ‗At-Risk‘ students.  Re-established a successful Navajo County ‘School Fair‘.  Completed a ‘Solar Project‘ which provides an alternative power source for the Navajo County Accommodation District.  Implemented new financial accounting software.  Collaborated with Arizona Association of School Business Officials (AASBO) to locally provide business manager training to interested people in the region.  Implemented two internet-based learning labs.  Provided curricular support to small schools in the region.  Provided professional expertise for the continuation of the SIT (Statewide Integration in Technology) Grant.  Expanded services provided through the consortium to include education specialists. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  Utilizing a ‗Needs Assessment‘ and ‗Evaluation‘ provided to our partners, the NCESA will identify and provide relevant and rigorous professional development opportunities throughout fiscal year 2011-12. Strategic Priority: Ensure Safe Communities  Through our partnerships and collaboration with technology teams, anti-drug coalitions, and First Things First. NCESA will continue to provide assistance to students, educators, parents and communities that encourages safe practices and builds community awareness as demonstrated by the information artifacts collected throughout fiscal year 2011-12. Strategic Priority: Promote and Protect the Public Health of our Citizens  Through cooperative efforts, the NCESA will provide medical services and support to our educational partners as demonstrated by our annual program evaluation and survey. 209 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Utilizing shared resources, responsibilities, and fiscal accountability, the NCESA will strengthen the current Leadership Team by continuing to meet every six weeks. Strategic Priority: Natural Resources and Cultural Preservation  Through a monthly Journal of Joy and a series of ‘Fun Days‘, the NCESA will provide opportunities to establish a sense of community by acquainting them with Navajo County‘s regional, ecological, and cultural diversity throughout 2011-12. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Using the groundwork that has been established over the past year, the NCESA will initiate, implement and incorporate the strengths of partner stakeholders to create a ‗Regional Center‘ between Navajo, Coconino, and Apache County ESA‘s. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Superintendent of Schools FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Schools Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 210 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that is needed to support General Fund expenditures. The increase in the General Fund expenditures is due to increases in retirement rates and medical benefits. The overall budget for this department increased by .46%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ 322,658 $ 338,286 $ 318,434 $ 339,829 Special Revenue - - - - Balance Forward - - - - Total Sources 0.46% N/A N/A $ 322,658 $ 338,286 $ 318,434 $ 339,829 0.46% $ 316,934 $ 325,211 $ 312,704 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay Total Uses $ 326,754 0.47% - 4,100 380 4,100 0.00% 5,725 8,975 5,350 8,975 0.00% - - - - N/A 0.46% 322,658 $ 338,286 $ 318,434 $ 339,829 Accounting Adjustments* $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ - $ - $ - $ - N/A * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 211 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TREASURER FY 2011-12 County Treasurer Deputy County Treasurer Office Support Specialist Data Input Specialist Office Support Specialist Accountant MISSION STATEMENT To provide the maximum levels of professionalism and knowledge to the residents of Navajo County and to responsibly invest monies on behalf of the county. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION  The county treasurer is the ex officio tax collector and shall:  Collect all property taxes.  Apportion the taxes to the respective funds on or before the end of each month.  The Treasurer is the banker for Navajo County, the treasurer‘s department pays bonds, and invests county funds while keeping three principles in mind; Safety, Liquidity, and Yield. As an agent for the State of Arizona, we ensure reports are processed timely and accurately. ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  Superior client service was provided by all employees in the treasurer‘s office. This includes the offices and departments we service, our servicing bank, the tax payers we encounter and the employees of Navajo County.  Our fiscal responsibility was met by using Positive Pay from our banker; this program assisted us in reducing fraud risk. Taking advantage of the services offered by our servicing bank also made a difference in how we accomplished our tasks at hand.  The servicing bank provided lines of credit to the different entities that needed them i.e. schools and fire districts. This allowed those entities in the county to continue serving the constituents that are within their districts.  This year we sent delinquent tax notice via a post card instead of a standard letter, thus requiring less postage. Total amount of savings approximately $5000.  Cost of posting our notices in the county paper this year went down, this has given us the opportunity to reduce expenses in this area.  The treasurer‘s office invested with safety, liquidity, and return on investment in mind, we were able to ensure that tax dollars were properly managed. 212 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TREASURER FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Provide Excellent Customer Service  We will continue to serve our taxpayers in a professional, courteous, and exceptional manner by:  Acknowledging them with a smile.  Handling their payments with care.  Answering their questions giving them correct information.  Directing them to the correct offices if we are unable to assist them. We will measure our success of these goals by offering a customer satisfaction survey at our front counter. Results will be monitored throughout the year.  By being practical in our operation. We will make sure that our facilities are safe and that the environment is clean so that anyone who enters the building will feel safe and welcomed. Our immediate area will be maintained on a daily basis so that atmosphere is pleasant.  We will work with our Risk Management Department to meet OSHA requirements and correct any deficiencies.  The County website and Facebook page have become a tool for us to get information out to the public. The information available has been a great asset to our office. We will continue to disseminate information to citizens by reviewing website content on a monthly basis.  We are currently planning on taking payments in our south county complex. Anyone wishing to contact the Treasurer‘s office will be given that opportunity and payments will be accepted at the south county facility. Services to be offered no later than July 1, 2011. Strategic Priority: Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  Our adopted Investment Policy will continue to be enforced by making sure we invest with safety, liquidity and return on all of our investments.  Our staff will continue to receive training on money management skills and internal controls through office orientation. Orientation to be done on a quarterly basis.  Customization and implementation of SharePoint site. Begin customization in July 2011 and full implementation by August 1st, 2011. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  The treasurer‘s of the State of Arizona meet twice a year, during these meeting times we receive training on investments, state/county growth, and office management. We will attend meetings in FY 2011-12 and gain knowledge and retain resources that will be beneficial to our county, its employees, and it citizens. The information we obtain will keep us up to date with technology and skills that will make the treasurer‘s office fiscally sound and responsible. 213 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TREASURER FY 2011-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 continued  The treasurer’s office will commit to its citizens and leaders in assuring them that we will collect the taxes in an expedient fashion in order for all of the entities that rely on these tax dollars to operate their office. We will have the first half of tax payments processed no later than January 31, 2012. The second half of tax payments will be processed no later June 30, 2012. We will communicate the progress of the collections by posting information on the county website and Facebook.  We will strive to get the tax notices in the taxpayer‘s hands in a timely fashion. Estimated date of distribution – 4th week of September 2011.  We will work on partial payment plans for those that are not able to pay the full amount when due.  With the assistance of the Assessor’s office and the Sheriff‘s office we will be able to collect taxes on personal property taxes that have gone unpaid in past years. We will consult with our Information Technology Department to review and potentially modify our receipting process to track the effectiveness of this collection process. DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Treasurer FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget General Fund 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Treasurer Total 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 214 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TREASURER FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: General Fund support is at the level that isneeded to support General Fund expenditures. There is a slight decrease in General Fund and Special Revenue expenditures. The overall budget for this department increased by .09%, of that, the General Fund budget decreased by 1.04%. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources General Revenue $ Special Revenue $ 11,234 Balance Forward Total Sources 421,043 447,327 $ 30,000 40,255 416,723 $ 31,327 20,461 12,962 442,667 -1.04% 19,400 -35.33% 35,260 72.33% $ 472,532 $ 497,788 $ 461,012 $ 497,327 -0.09% $ 344,068 $ 347,577 $ 342,749 $ Uses Personal Services 352,167 1.32% 1,828 5,350 2,774 3,000 -43.93% Professional Services 85,017 95,861 71,200 90,500 -5.59% Capital Outlay 10,645 49,000 9,029 51,660 5.43% -0.09% Supplies $ 441,558 $ Accounting Adjustments * $ (10,500) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ 20,474 $ - Total Uses 497,788 * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. $ $ 425,752 35,260 $ 497,327 $ - N/A $ - N/A 215 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY County Manager Assistant County Manager WIA Executive Director Senior Secretary WIA Case Manager (3) WIA Program Coordinator MISSION STATEMENT The Navajo and Apache Counties‘ Workforce Investment Board will work to facilitate business retention and growth by partnering with education, service agencies and the business community to empower individuals with skills that promote self-sufficiency. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Workforce Investment Act administers and implements Department of Labor funded Workforce Investment grants for citizens of Navajo and Apache Counties that reside off tribal lands. The grant funding has four primary focus areas: Youth, Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Administration. Approved program costs for this employment and training program include education and training expenses as well as supportive services to assist participants in the elimination of barriers to their efforts in becoming self -sufficient. We make a difference by:  Partnering with local educational entities and responding to the changing training needs for the work environment  Training individuals to take charge of their career success, and  Providing employers with quality employees All in a fiscally responsible manner. 216 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT FY 2011-12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR FY 2010-11  We successfully underwent the following annual audits:  Equal Opportunity, Data Validation, WIA Program Review, WIA Fiscal Review, Auditor General‘s Single Audit.  Despite the current economic state, we are on track to meet or exceed all fifteen (15) performance measures as set by state and federal governments for WIA nationwide.  We have built partnerships with training entities inside and outside of our local area, therefore expanding the available educational opportunities for our participants and maximizing the impact of department funds.  Continued to improve upon departmental policies and procedures to allow for a more efficient delivery of services to WIA customers, both program participants and local employers by providing quality services in a timely manner.  Enrolled and effectively served eligible Youth, Adults, and Dislocated Workers with Intensive and training services as well as supportive services.  Assisted participants in overcoming employment and training barriers and assisted Dislocated Workers in obtaining new, marketable job skills following a recent lay-off. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2011 – 12 Strategic Priority: Providing Excellent Customer Service  To continue the department‘s focus on providing quality services in a timely manner, while approaching our participant‘s needs with empathy, dedication, and integrity.  To be proactive in assessing and responding to the changing needs of our customers, both program participants and employers through partnerships with educational entities and employers. Strategic Priority: Providing Organization Health and Fiscal Responsibility  To continue the department’s dedication to the responsible use of public funds by reviewing and revising local WIA policies and making adjustments to increase the efficiency of service and maximize the impact of department funds. Strategic Priority: Regional Leadership  Create regional partnerships with interested workforce service providers to maximize limited resources for the benefits of both employers and program participants;  Play a strategic role in regional economic development by strengthening the quality of the local workforce through training in an effort to leverage regional economic competitiveness and stability by meeting employers’ needs for talented and skilled personnel; which will in turn improve the regional quality of life by enhancing the employment skills of Youth, Adults, and Dislocated Workers. 217 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT FY 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) OVERVIEW There are no significant changes in Full Time Equivalent's (FTE). Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees by Funding Source Workforce Investm ent Act (WIA) FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget WIA 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 WIA Total 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW Department Budget Overview: The over all budget has increased by 20.11% this is in large part due to higher than anticipated revenues in 2010-11, resulting in a positive balance forward. This accounts for the increase to the supplies line. 2010 Actual Amount 2011 Adopted Budget 2011 Actual Amount 2012 Adopted Budget % Change Sources WIA Revenue 270,116 Balance Forward (23,479) Total Sources 1,261,340 634,137 (175,836) (178,665) 1,128,791 -10.51% 175,027 -199.54% 20.11% $ 246,637 $ 1,085,504 $ 455,472 $ 1,303,818 $ 244,662 $ 296,158 $ 216,554 $ Uses Personal Services Supplies Professional Services Capital Outlay 299,094 0.99% 11,900 50,000 13,756 146,107 192.21% 150,602 739,346 50,135 857,417 15.97% 1,200 N/A 20.11% 635 - $ 407,799 $ Accounting Adjustments* $ (10,126) $ - Fund Balance as of 6/30 $ (171,288) $ - Total Uses 1,085,504 * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. $ $ 280,445 175,027 $ 1,303,818 $ - N/A $ - N/A 218 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW FY 2011-12 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 220 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 INTRODUCTION It is the policy of the Board of Supervisors (BOS) to adopt a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which shall be published on an annual basis. The first year of the annual CIP shall be appropriated as the county‘s capital improvement budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The CIP shall be reviewed, evaluated, prioritized, and updated on an annual basis in conjunction with the operation budget cycle. The CIP shall include a schedule of capital improvement projects by year, including the estimated total capital cost, estimated annual operation costs or savings, and anticipated funding source(s) for each project. DEFINITIONS A capital improvement project is an investment of public funds of at least $100,000, which relates directly to the county‘s strategic plan and has a useful life of at least five (5) years. Examples of a capital improvement project include, but are not limited to:  Land acquisition.  New Construction or acquisition of public buildings or structures.  Remodeling and/or additions to public buildings or structures.  Construction of new and replacement infrastructure projects (roads, storm drains, bridges, sewers, etc.)  Equipment, individual vehicles, and major computer/software systems.  Soft costs related to items 1 through 5 above, including legal costs, engineering costs, and architectural design costs.  Studies less than $100,000, which are preparatory to a capital improvement project of at least $100,000. RESPONSIBILITIES The BOS is responsible for adopting a five-year CIP on an annual basis. The BOS is also responsible for appropriating the first year of the five-year CIP on an annual basis. The County Manager is responsible for preparing and submitting a final recommendation for the proposed five-year CIP to the BOS at least 45 days prior to the statutory deadline for adopting the annual budget. The Director of Finance is responsible for compiling agency and department capital improvement project requests, evaluating the impact of each request on the county‘s debt structure and multi-year budget projection, and assisting the County Manager with the development of a proposed five-year CIP. In developing the proposed five-year CIP, the Director of Finance will ensure that project costs are indexed for estimated inflation. 221 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 A five-year CIP shall be adopted by the Board of Supervisors on an annual basis to accomplish the following objectives:  To reflect the county‘s strategic planning regarding the future development of Navajo County and the county‘s desired level of support for future development.  To identify all capital improvement projects requests in the five-year period covered by the CIP.  To link plans for physical facilities to available financial resources.  To calculate the estimated financial impact of the five-year CIP on the county‘s debt structure and multi-year budget projection, including the estimated annual operation costs for each project.  To illustrate and communicate the county‘s proactive control over the management and issuance of new debt.  To encourage orderly growth by informing the private sector of public facility plans.  To facilitate intergovernmental coordination of capital planning in Navajo County.  To encourage citizen participation in the annual CIP process and citizen understanding of the county‘s capital improvement needs. 222 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 223 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 NAVAJO NATION JOINT PROJECTS User Department: Public Works Project Location: Navajo Nation County District(s): I and II Project Partner(s): Navajo Nation Department of Transportation Scheduled Completion Date: To Be Determined. Project Description: Navajo County has an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Navajo Nation for the Public Works Department to partner with the Navajo Nation Department of Transportation in completing approximately 32 miles of graveling within District I and District II of Navajo County. The County will provide assistance to the Nation in the procurement of road materials and supplies for the projects and provide technical assistance as needed. Portions of the following BIA Routes will have gravel applied: N4, N9102, N8031, N8073, and N9065. Staff estimates that these projects may take a few years to complete. Route N9102 was originally completed in October 2008 and additional work completed in December of 2010. These graveling projects will increase the safety to the traveling public. Funding/Cost Summary: The IGA specifies that the Nation has set aside up to $2,747,183 in the Navajo Nation Road Fund for reimbursement to the County. Thus, no financial impact to the County is anticipated in connection with these projects. Prior Years Actual FY 11-12 FY 12-13 Navajo Nation Road Funds 551,061 1,551,000 536,895 2,638,956 Project Total: 551,061 1,551,000 536,895 2,638,956 Funding Source FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 Total Project Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable since the Navajo Nation Department of Transportation will be responsible for maintenance. 224 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 WOODRUFF - SNOWFLAKE BRIDGE User Department: Public Works Project Location: Woodruff Road between Woodruff and Snowflake, AZ County District(s): III Project Partner(s): Arizona Department of Transportation/Federally Funded Scheduled Completion Date: Estimated: October 2014 Project Description: The Woodruff-Snowflake Bridge was built in 1939 and accommodates two-way traffic. The purpose of the project is to rehabilitate the existing bridge and to strengthen it for continued use without unduly impacting the historic significance of the bridge. Currently, the bridge load rating is 3-tons; the county seeks to upgrade the load rating to 15-tons. The scope of work includes; removing and replacing the existing wooden bridge deck, strengthening the steel trusses, stringers and floor beams, repairing both abutment walls, installing new steel guardrail, and adding new signage. The State Historic Preservation Office has approved these modifications to the historic bridge. This project has been selected for FHWA funding through the Travel Enhancement Grant (Round 18) as administered by ADOT Local Government Enhancement Group in the amount of $750,000 for the construction costs. The county is seeking additional funding through FHWA Bridge Rehabilitation funding for an estimated $425,500 to cover all design, environmental issues, utility and Right-of-Way costs. Matching funds from the county will total 5.7% of the total federal funds received. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public; protect historic resources, enhance visual appearance, allow county forces to maintain the roadway without having to divert selected equipment from Woodruff through Snowflake and continue to provide access to recreational opportunities. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Engineering Highway User Revenue Funds (5.7%) Federal Funds Construction Highway User Revenue Funds FHWA Funds Project Total: Prior Yrs Actual Year 1 FY 11-12 Year 2 FY 12-13 Year 3 FY 13-14 Year 4 FY 14-15 Year 5 FY 15-16 0 24,253 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 125,000 100,250 100,250 0 0 0 42,750 0 125,000 375,000 518,000 375,000 475,250 0 124,253 Total Project 24,253 425,500 0 42,750 750,000 1,242,503 Operating Cost Summary: $15,000 bridge inspection, wood deck surface repair, guardrail maintenance and gravel approach maintenance. 225 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 CHEVELON CREEK BRIDGE User Department: Public Works Project Location: Territorial Road between Holbrook and Winslow, AZ County District(s): III Project Partner(s): Arizona Department of Transportation/Federally Funded Scheduled Completion Date: Estimated: October 2012 Project Description: The Chevelon Creek Bridge was built in 1913 and accommodates two-way traffic. The purpose of the project is to rehabilitate the existing bridge and to strengthen it for continued use without unduly impacting the historic significance of the bridge. Currently, the bridge load rating is 10-tons; the county seeks to upgrade the load rating to 25-tons. The scope of work includes; removing and replacing the existing concrete bridge deck, strengthening the steel trusses, Stringers and floor beams, repairing one abutment, re-painting the bridge steel, installing new steel guardrail, and adding new signage. The State Historic Preservation Office has approved these modifications to the historic bridge. This project has been sitting idle due to insufficient funding. The project was originally bid in 2006 but, the bid price surpassed the construction budget by approx. 40%. The county is currently seeking additional Federal Funds (Bridge Rehabilitation of approximately $450,000) to offset the current estimated construction cost. All design and environmental issues have been previously addressed but, will need to be updated. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public; protect historic resources, enhance visual appearance, allow county forces to maintain the roadway without having to divert equipment from Holbrook through Winslow and continue to provide access to recreational opportunities. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Engineering Highway User Revenue Funds Federal Funds Construction Highway User Revenue Funds FHWA Funds Project Total: Prior Yrs Actual 59,378 Year 1 FY 11-12 Year 2 FY 12-13 18,783 Year 4 FY 14-15 Year 5 FY 15-16 Total Project 78,161 56,580 56,580 194,510 310,468 Year 3 FY 13-14 194,510 405,490 424,273 450,000 450,000 855,490 1,184,741 Operating Cost Summary: $15,000 bridge inspection, concrete surface repair, guardrail maintenance, bridge painting, and gravel approach maintenance. 226 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 PERKINS VALLEY SUBDIVISION - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Holbrook III N/A Summer 2012 Road Info: Length 2.107 (22' wide); ADT=26, Road Rating=5 Project Description: This project includes a 3" overlay (ADOT 409) for 2.07 miles of roadway in the Perkins Valley Subdivision. The cracks are too wide to be sealed. This subdivision is in bad shape and needs full pulverization and new pavement. The County will use millings for base and shoulders. Approximately 1" of ABC will be applied to create a smooth base. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/Cost Summary: Engineering Pulverize Yes Patch ABC 1" class 2 A/C 3" (409) Perkins Valley Subdivision Perkins Valley Road Davis Road Lateral #2 Section Line North Future Operation Costs: 2013 Slurry Seal - $73,216. Unit Unit Price Measured Qnty $2 SY 29,146 $35 $110 Ton Ton 1,420 4,358 0.62 0.94 0.25 0.26 2.07 Ext. Cost in-house $58,292 in-house $479,380 $537,672 227 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 WAGON WHEEL LANE - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Wagon Wheel IV N/A Summer 2012 SR 260 Road Info: Length=0.88; Road Rating=4 Project Description: This project is a 3" Mill and Fill. Road geometrics prevent raising road. This is the portion of Wagon Wheel Lane from SR 260 to Starlight Ridge Subdivision. The current road condition is slight surface rutting and deformation. There are many expansion/ contraction cracks, major block cracking, and major alligator cracks. A 1" Class 2 base will be added to create a smooth paveable surface. Milling at the SR 260 intersection will also be required to tie-in at Highway. An ADOT R.O.W. permit will need to be obtained. This overlay will include new pavement at the intersection because of all the potholes. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling 3" + 1"Base Patches Fabric + Tack ABC smooth base A/C 3" ADOT 409 Future Operation Costs: 2014 Slurry Seal - $15,654 Unit Cost Unit Measured Qnty $2 No No $35 $110 SY 11,360 Ton Ton 600 2,021 Ext. Cost in-house $22,720 in-house $222,310 $245,030 228 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 FARNSWORTH RANCH ROAD - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works/ USFS Pinedale IV N/A Summer 2012 Road Info: Length=0.12, ADT = 115 (July 2010), Road Rating=3 Project Description: This is the short section of paved road that comes off of SR 260 to a cattle guard. The road is completely falling apart and needs to be pulverized and a new 3" pavement. There is also a wide area (50' past the cattle guard) that is a bus stop that could be paved. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling Reconstruct/ shape ABC misc. A/C Future Operation Costs: Slurry Seal - $2,300 Unit Cost Unit Measured Qnty. $2 SY 1,800 $35 $110 Ton Ton 90 300 Ext. Cost in-house $3,600 in-house in-house $33,000 $36,600 229 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 ZANE GREY TRAIL - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Heber V N/A Summer 2012 Road Info: Length=-0.05, Road Rating=2 Project Description: This is a very short piece of road. There is a wide radius apron going up a hill and the paved surface is falling apart. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Unit Cost Unit Measured Engineering Milling Remove and Trash Reconstruct/ shape ABC A/C $110 Ton Future Operation Costs: 2013 Slurry Seal - $1,200 Qnty 200 Ext. Cost in-house in-house in-house in-house $22,000 $22,000 230 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 BOURDON RANCH ROAD - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works WML/ East Show Low III N/A June, 2011 Road Info: Length=2.3, ADT=1705(June 2010), Road Rating=7 (5 for this portion) Project Description: This is a 2" overlay with fabric from SR 60 to cattle guard. Pavement failure is occuring at both sides of cattleguard, remove failed sections and bring grade up to standards, patch 5" (two lifts) for smooth transition with cattle guards. Contractor will tie-into our patches. There are approximately 5-10 cracks that are wider than 2" that will need to be removed and patched. Cattle guards also have concrete structure failing. OPTIONAL: Additional 1.33 miles continuing North (just past Roundup Drive). Recommend paving turnouts for the new subdivision on the maintained side roads. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/Cost Summary: Unit Cost Unit Measured Engineering Milling no Patch $50 SY ABC shoulders $35 Ton A/C 2" (ADOT 417) $120 Ton fabric+tack $2.10 SY Qnty Ext Cost in-house 480 526 3815 32384 $24,000 in-house $457,800 $68,006 $549,806 Future Operation Costs: Delay chip seal until all overlay is complete up to M.P 12 approximate impact to operating budget $32,160 in 2013. 231 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 232 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 FOREST TRAILS SUBDIVISION User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Heber IV N/A Summer 2012 Road Info: Length=8.24, ADT=Low, Rating=5-7 Project Description: Subdivsion roads are aging / failing at a higher rate than surrounding areas. There are many cracks and some roads are entirely beginning to alligator. County forces will need to crackseal prior to the application of fabric and overlay. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/Cost Summary: Engineering Milling Reconstruct/ shape ABC A/C 2" Unit Cost Unit Measured Qnty Ext Cost in-house Ton 12,617 $1,387,870 No No $110 233 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 FOREST TRAILS SUBDIVISION - PAGE TWO RID Road Name From Road To Road Forest Trails #1 152 Cedar Circle 153 Cedar Ridge None 402 Fools Circle 465 Homestead Drive 514 Lodgepole Road 545 Meadow Trail 668 Pinion Street 1040 Ridge Circle 1042 Roundabout Way 739 Roundabout Circle 763 Silver Dollar Street 236 Two Bits Street 1051 Yellowjacket Circle 448 Halfway Street End of Cul de Sac Bootlegger Drive Forest Park Drive Lodgepole Road Meadow Trail Mogollon Drive Silver Dollar Street Pinion Street Arrowhead Drive Homestead Road Bootlegger Drive Mogollon Drive End of Cul de Sac Lodgepole Road Cedar Ridge Pinion Street End of Cul de Sac Chevelon Road Chevelon Road Country Club Drive Cedar Ridge End of Cul de Sac Homestead Drive End of Cul de Sac Homestead Drive Lodgepole Road Forest Park Drive Silver Dollar Street Phase #1 Miles: 0.06 0.38 0.07 0.44 1.35 0.86 0.45 0.11 0.4 0.89 0.65 0.11 0.1 0.08 5.95 Forest Trails #3 396 Buck Lane 117 Buck Circle 398 Crest Circle 417 Four Point 418 Four Point Circle 444 Grizzly Drive 1037 Monica Road 406 Monica Circle 613 Mountain Lion Lane 1041 Rim Circle 1045 Wapiti Drive 1046 Wapiti Circle Lodgepole Road End of Cul de Sac End of Cul a Sac Buck Lane End of Cul de Sac Lodgepole Road Ransack Road End of Cul de Sac Sunset Drive End of Cul de Sac Moccasin Drive End of Cul de Sac Mountain Lion Lane Buck Lane Monica Road Lodgepole Road Buck Lane End of Cul de Sac Wapiti Drive Monica Road Grizzly Drive Monica Road Chevelon Road Monica Road 0.3 0.07 0.05 0.3 0.13 0.18 0.48 0.06 0.26 0.06 0.27 0.13 Phase #3 Miles: Length 2.29 Future Operation Costs: Possible fog seal over rubber chips. Impact to operating budget approximately $146,522 in 2013. 234 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 SCOTT RANCH ROAD User Department: Public Works Project Location: City of Show Low County District(s): IV Project Partner(s): City of Show Low Scheduled Completion Date: Unknown at this time Project Description: The recently completed Transportation Study in the southern portion of the county recommended that Scott Ranch Road be extended from SR-260 (White Mountain Boulevard) to Penrod Road. The project is considered a critical route in the regional transportation plan. A Federal Aid Grant for approximately $2.25 million has been acquired by the City of Show Low to pay for a portion of the project‘s cost, estimated to be $5,500,000. The City of Show Low has requested that Navajo County share in the local cost of the project, due to its regional character and county-wide benefit. All project management will be provided by the City of Show Low. Funding/Cost Summary: Navajo County has provided $200,000 to the City of Show Low for the Design Concept Report and Environmental studies, and 30% plans. If the project proceeds to construction, four additional yearly installments of $200,000 would be provided to help in the cost of the project. The grand total of the participation would be $1,000,000, provided over five years. The City of Show Low has acquired 2.25 million and will provide additional funds as needed. Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable since the City of Show Low will be responsible for any maintenance cost. 235 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 NAVAJO NATION ROAD PARTNERSHIP PROJECT(S) User Department: Public Works Project Location: Navajo Nation County District(s): I & II Project Partner(s): Navajo Nation Department of Transportation Scheduled Completion Date: To Be Determined Project Description: Navajo County has set aside funding to partner with the Navajo Nation Department of Transportation for various public (BIA) road projects within District I & II of Navajo County. The county will provide assistance to the Nation in the procurement of road materials and supplies for the projects and provide technical assistance as needed. In Fiscal Year 2011 Navajo County provided funding for the excavating of 20,000 tons of red rock material to be utilized on various public (BIA) roads within District I of Navajo County. These road projects will increase the safety to the traveling public. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Highway User Revenue Funds Project Total: Prior Yrs Actual Year 1 FY 11-12 Year 2 FY 12-13 Year 3 FY 13-14 Year 4 FY 14-15 Year 5 FY 15-16 Total Project 129,600 150,000 150,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 729,600 129,600 150,000 150,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 729,600 Operating Cost Summary: Not applicable since the Navajo Nation Department of Transportation will be responsible for maintenance. 236 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 Old HWY 160 (Clay Springs) - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Clay Springs IV N/A Summer 2013 Road Info: Length=1.16, ADT=914 (June 2010), Road Rating=5 Project Description: Old Highway 160 has rutting deformities, some subgrade failure, and multiple patches and 'skin patches'. Engineering needs to look at drainage issues (possibly install cross culverts to drain to the West). Patch repair on this road needs to be deep. Remove failed sections down to stable subgrade(18" +/-), fill with class 2 ABC in 6" lifts , and T-Top patches. Leave patches on the high side for traffic to work in. Patch repairs need to be completed 1 year before overlay. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling no Patch repair ABC shoulders A/C 2" (ADOT 417) Unit Cost Unit Measured Future Operation Costs: 2014-2015 Chip Seal - $57,000 $100 $35 $120 SY Ton Ton Qnty Est Cost in-house 100 133 1776 $10,000 in-house $213,120 $223,120 237 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 CHRISTMAS TREE CIRCLE AREA - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Pinetop CC V N/A Summer, 2013 Road Info: Length=0.57 (total) Project Description: These are subdivision roads that are failing much quicker than surrounding roads. Roads are alligator cracked. Recommend pulverizing full depth and a new 3" overlay (ADOT 409). This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling Reconstruct/ shape ABC 2" base A/C 3" adot 409 Christmas Tree Circle Area: Christmas Tree Circle Grey fox Lane Muskrat Crossman Court Unit Cost Unit Measured Qnty $2 SY 8225 $35 $120 Ton Ton 782 1500 0.36 0.05 0.1 0.06 0.57 Future Operation Costs: 2015 Slurry Seal - approximately $11,000 Ext Cost in-house $16,450 in-house $180,000 $196,450 238 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 MOON CREEK CIRCLE AREA - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works Pinetop CC V N/A Summer 2013 Road Info: Length=0.79, ADT= , Road Rating=2 Project Description: Existing pavement is failing/100% alligator cracks and cannot be saved. These roads need a complete pulverization and a new 3" overlay (ADOT 409). This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling Reconstruct/ shape ABC 2" A/C Unit Cost Unit Measured Qnty $2 SY 12000 $35 $120 Ton Ton 1200 2100 Moon Creek Circle Area Moon Creek circle Trout Creek Lane Bear Paw circle Beaver Dam Beaver Dam circle Future Operation Costs: 2015/2016 Slurry Seal - $18,000 0.48 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.79 Ext Cost in-house $24,000 in-house $252,000 $276,000 239 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 LITTLE MORMON LAKE ROAD - OVERLAY User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Public Works 3 miles East of Show Low, AZ IV N/A Summer 2013 Road Info: Length=2.0, ADT=1042 (June 2010) Road Rating=5 Project Description: This is a 2" overlay. There are many isolated areas of failure down to subgrade. Must remove large excess portions around failure and go deep to stable material. Compact (wacker) ABC in 6" lifts. Ttop patches and patch 3" A/C. Just patching and crack seal would raise rating to 7. Crack seal road before overlay. This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling Remove and Replace ABC A/C Future Operation Costs: 2014 Chip Seal - $98,560 Unit Cost Unit Measured 16.67 35 120 SY Ton Ton Qnty Ext Cost in-house 600 50 3020 $10,002 in-house $362,400 240 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 SOARING EAGLE, DRIFT FENCE CIRCLE & ROARING FORK DRIVE - OVERLAYS Public Works Pinetop V N/A Summer 2013 User Department: Project Location: County District: Project Partners: Scheduled Completion Date: Road Info: Length=1.15, ADT= , Road Rating=4 Project Description: Roads are cracking (deep and wide). May have to use a sand mix along with regular crack seal. Then overlay 2". This project will increase the safety of the traveling public. Funding/cost Summary: Engineering Milling Reconstruct/ shape ABC A/C 2" adot 409 Road: Soaring Eagle Drift Fence circle Roaring fork Dr Future Operation Costs: 2014 Slurry Seal - $32,384 Unit Cost Unit Measured 120 Ton Qnty Ext. Cost in-house 1761 Length 0.61 0.13 0.41 Amount $112,091 $23,888 $75,340 1.15 $211,320 $211,320 5,160,142 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation Carryover 2,205,650 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation New Funding Winslow Levee Rehabilitation Carryover Winslow Levee Rehabilitation New Funding 200,000 300,000 25,000 150,000 50,000 Scott Ranch Rd Drainage Porter Creek Drainage City of Holbrook - Levee Maintenance Holbrook Rd Yd- Relocation Study Ski High Drainage 10,466,890 Total Budget 150,000 Lee Reese Drainage Improvements 8,690,792 Total Budget 25,000 Reservation Drainage Improvements 100,000 200,000 Improvements to County Drainage 1,000,000 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation New Funding 7,365,792 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation Carryover CONTRACT PROJECTS 2013-14 9,590,792 Total Budget 25,000 Reservation Drainage Improvements 200,000 Improvements to County Drainage 1,000,000 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation New Funding 8,365,792 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation Carryover PROJECTS 2014-15 10,590,792 Total Budget 25,000 Reservation Drainage Improvements 200,000 Improvements to County Drainage 1,000,000 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation New Funding 9,365,792 Winslow Levee Rehabilitation Carryover PROJECTS 2015-16 11,590,792 25,000 200,000 1,000,000 10,365,792 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Total Budget 25,000 Reservation Drainage Improvements Reservation Drainage Improvements Improvements to County 805,098 Improvements to County Drainage Drainage Anticipated Projects: Snowflake Dredging over Silver Creek (50,000) Taylor Detention Basin (50,000) Silver Creek Drainage (150,000) Southern Solution (271,789) Southern Solution Misc. Improvements (233,309) City of Winslow Levee (50,000) 1,396,000 CONTRACT PROJECTS CONTRACT PROJECTS Corp Feasibilitiy Study 2012-13 2011-12 FLOOD CONTROL - FY 2011/2012 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 241 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y FY 2011-12 242 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 WINSLOW LEVEE FEASIBILITY STUDY User Department: Navajo County Flood Control District Project Location: Winslow, AZ County District(s): II and III Project Partner(s): Army Corps of Engineers Scheduled Completion Date: 2016 Project Description: The Winslow Levee is a 7.2 mile flood control structure that was rebuilt 15 years ago to provide 100-year flood protection for parts of Winslow and the surrounding unincorporated areas. At that time, the levee met all Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements for 100-year flood protection, and was certified as such. Recent FEMA Map Modernization, September 26, 2008, resulted in the de-certification of the levee. The decertification of the levee placed approximately 2,700 parcels, several hundred homes and businesses, as well as the City of Winslow's wastewater treatment plant, into a new floodplain. Most of Winslow is now in a floodplain and most residents and business are required to buy flood insurance. This newly expanded floodplain will have a significantly negative economic impact on the Winslow community. The Army Corps and the funding partner, Navajo County Flood Control District (NCFCD), have begun work on the Feasibility Study. The work is funded, first, via Congressional appropriation and, then, with matching funds from Navajo County. The cost for the Feasibility Study is $5.7 million and includes project plans, feasibility reports, environmental impact statements, hydrology and hydraulic studies, engineering analysis, cost estimate and alternative comparisons. The Federal Cost Share is $2,850,000. NCFCD is also committed to the same amount (1 million in-kind contribution and 1,850,000 cash). The Feasibility Study will be followed by the Engineering Design and Construction Phases. In order to fund the construction phase, NCFCD is saving approximately 1 million per year. 243 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 WINSLOW LEVEE FEASIBILITY STUDY Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source NCFCD-Feasibility Study Federal Funds-Feasibility Study NCFCD (Construction Savings) Project Total: Prior Yrs Actual 453,900 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 353,000 260,750 260,750 260,750 260,750 Total Project 1,849,900 599,000 599,000 599,000 599,000 2,850,000 454,000 5,160,142 2,345,362 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 11,505,504 6,068,042 2,698,362 1,859,750 1,859,750 1,859,750 1,859,750 16,205,404 Operating Cost Summary: The Feasibility Study will be followed by an Engineering Study which will provide an Operating and Maintenance Manual. The current Operating and Maintenance Manual requires quarterly inspections to determine rodent activity, gate operation, bank protection condition, vegetation control, and other similar inspection activity. The inspections are conducted by the Floodplain Administrator for the Flood Control District. The current cost for vegetation and rodent control is $25,000 per year. In addition an average of $200,000 has been spent in the last 3 years for maintenance related to the levee structure. The Operating and Maintenance Manual that will be provided by the Army Corps will determine future Operating Costs. 244 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 LEE REESE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT User Department: Navajo County Flood Control District Project Location: Rainbow Lake Estates, Lakeside County District(s): V Project Partner(s): Navajo County Flood Control District Scheduled Completion Date: 2013 Project Description: Every year Lee Reese Drive experiences flooding problems caused by an inadequate drainage system and upstream development. The natural flow of water enters this portion of the Rainbow Lake Estates subdivision at 1808 Lee Reese Dr. and flows in a south westerly direction as it makes its way to Rainbow Lake. We asked Arizona Engineering Company to analyze the existing conditions and provide us with an improvement design. Based on their analysis we are planning to replace all existing culverts, pave Lee Reese Dr. and build a detention basin on parcel 212-32-007A to control the flow through the neighborhood. Parcel 212-32-007A is vacant land located in Rainbow Lake Estates Lot #8 and a potential site for a detention basin. This property is privately owned and a purchase agreement will need to be reached with the owner. The proposed basin on this property will be designed to detain flow for up to a 50 year storm event. The improved drainage system downstream of it would be sized to handle the volume of flow released from the basin. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Navajo County Flood Control District Prior Years Actual FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 Total Project $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Federal Funds Project Total: 245 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 PORTER MOUNTAIN ROAD – PORTER CREEK CROSSING User Department: Navajo County Flood Control District Project Location: ¼ Mile North of Town of Pinetop/Lakeside County District(s): V Project Partner(s): Navajo County Flood Control District Scheduled Completion Date: June 2012 Project Description: There are four culverts at the Porter Creek crossing that are showing signs of aging. These culverts need to have liners installed to expand the life of the culverts and to keep them from collapsing. This project will maintain the safety of the travelling public. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Navajo County Flood Control District Project Total: Prior Yrs Actual Year 1 FY 11-12 300,000 300,000 Year 2 FY 12-13 Year 3 FY 13-14 Year 4 FY 14-15 Year 5 FY 15-16 Total Project 300,000 300,000 Operating Cost Summary: Minimum maintenance will be required for the next 15-20 years. Semi – Annual maintenance (debris removal) $100/year. 246 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 HOLBROOK ROAD YARD RELOCATION STUDY User Department: Navajo County Flood Control District Project Location: Holbrook, AZ County District(s): III Project Partner(s): Navajo County Flood Control District Scheduled Completion Date: June 2013 Project Description: The area surrounding the Holbrook Road Yard is in a floodplain located adjacent to the Little Colorado River. County property at this yard is repeatedly attacked each year by the rivers flood waters when it is conveying volumes of high flow. Navajo County Public Works emergency crews, equipment and materials are required to mitigate flooding of the Holbrook road yard to minimize damage to County property. This usually occurs during times when the crews, equipment and materials are also needed to mitigate flooding around other parts of the County. Relocation of the Holbrook Road Yard will remove the threat of damage to this road yard from flood waters and enable crews to concentrate their efforts on the safety of our citizens during times of emergency. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Navajo County Flood Control District FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Total Project $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Federal Funds Project Total: 247 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 DREDGING OF SILVER CREEK User Department: Project Location: County District(s): Project Partner(s): Scheduled Completion Date: Navajo County Flood Control District Snowflake, AZ III Town of Snowflake June 2015 Project Description: Dredge silted in portions of Silver Creek through Snowflake and Taylor to clear the channel of sediment and invasive vegetation in order to mitigate potential disastrous flooding to property owners along Silver Creek. The buildup of sediment, silt and salt cedar has caused an obstruction to flow of water in Silver Creek through the Town of Snowflake and Taylor. As a result it has caused the elevation of flood waters to rise and damage several properties along Silver Creek. The water quality in Silver Creek has also been reduced with higher amounts of sediment as a result of the silt deposits that are made worse by the overgrowth of salt cedar. Navajo County Flood Control District shall reimburse the Town of Snowflake for 50% of the eligible costs of the Project, up to a maximum reimbursement of $50,000. Eligible costs are the actual expenses of design, engineering and other contractual services directly associated with the Project, property acquisition directly associated with the Project, and construction and program management. Funding/Cost Summary: Funding Source Navajo County Flood Control District Project Total: FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 Total Project $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 248 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 249 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2011-12 250 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COUNTY BONDS 252 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY BONDS FY 2011-12 Navajo County Debt Policy Navajo County adopted a debt management policy with the purpose of maintaining the stability of the County and the ability to incur present and future debt at minimal interest rates in amounts needed for infrastructure and economic development without endangering its ability to finance essential County Services. The legal debt limit of Navajo County is equal to 15% of the County's net secondary assessed valuation. For FY 2011-12 this would total $156,061,818. · · · The County will not fund current operations from the proceeds of the borrowed funds. The County will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements or projects. When the County finances capital projects by issuing debt, it will repay the debt within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project. Special Districts Debt Special districts incurred debt for a number of County improvement districts for districts such as County Road Improvement Districts and Domestic Water Improvement Districts. Assessments are levied annually on property owners within the boundaries of these special districts to pay the debt service for the improvements incurred. Debt Service Payments The following chart shows the principal outstanding on all Navajo County and Special Districts debt at the end of each fiscal year for the next five years. The figures below assume that Navajo County will not issue any new debt through FY 15. Principal Outstanding Navajo County Jail Facility Bonds, Series 2000 Pledged Revenue Obligation, Series 2008 Total Percent of Legal Debt Limit FY 12 $ 4,345,000 FY 13 $ 3,970,000 FY 14 $ 3,570,000 FY 15 $ 3,145,000 FY 16 $ 2,700,000 5,545,000 $ 9,890,000 6% 5,165,000 $ 9,135,000 6% 4,780,000 $ 8,350,000 5% 4,375,000 $ 7,520,000 5% 3,955,000 $ 6,655,000 4% FY 14 $ 254,752 996,238 249,000 3,713 120,000 37,523 113,021 36,262 415,000 40,981 404,374 80,343 $ 2,751,207 FY 15 $ 201,752 963,178 223,000 100,000 30,019 109,021 23,600 285,000 20,491 310,562 63,943 $ 2,330,566 FY 16 $ 145,752 929,458 196,000 80,000 22,514 105,021 10,937 150,000 212,202 47,543 $ 1,899,427 Principal Outstanding Special Districts Beaver Dam Circle CRID Bucking Horse CRID Drifting Snow Loop CRID Fawnbrook DWID Hilltop Drive CRID Madison Lane CRID Mountain View CRID North Whistle Stop Loop CRID Porter Mountain DWID Scott's Pine Tract A CRID Shumway Road CRID Sutter Drive CRID White Mountain Summer Homes DWID Wild Cat Way CRID Wonderland Acres DWID Total CRID - County Road Improvement District DWID - Domestic Water improvement District FY 12 $ 352,752 1,060,425 295,000 11,138 160,000 52,533 121,021 61,587 635,000 81,963 579,240 113,143 $ 3,523,802 FY 13 $ 304,752 1,028,649 274,000 7,425 140,000 45,028 117,021 48,925 530,000 61,472 493,629 96,743 $ 3,147,644 253 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY BONDS FY 2011-12 FY 11 Debt Payments The following schedule shows the FY12 interest and principal payments for debt in each Major fund and a total of all other Non Major funds. Jail Facility Bonds Pledged Revenue Obligation 2008 Series Non Major Funds Total Interest $ 278,100 215,985 166,205 $ 660,290 Principal $ 355,000 370,000 361,973 $ 1,086,973 Rating Agency Analysis Independent assessments are provided by rating agencies to clarify credit worthiness of municipal securities. Rating agencies provide letter grades from their assessment that determine the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay its debt in full and on time. These agencies issue credit ratings that play a major factor in determining the cost of borrowed funds in the municipal bond market. Two major rating agencies that rate municipal debt are Standard & Poor's and Duff & Phelps. These rating agencies have provided a rating assessment of credit worthiness for Navajo County. The following five items are primary factors in their decision of rating: · · · · · Economic Conditions – Stability of trends, Debt-History of County – Debt and debt position, Governmental/Administration – Leadership and organizational structure of the County, Financial Performance – Current financial status and the history of the financial reports, Debt Management – Debt policies, including long-term planning. Examples of the rating systems are: BOND RATINGS: Explanation of Corporate/Municipal Bond Ratings RATING AGENCIES Duff & Phelps AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC CC C DDD DD D * Duff & Phelps and Standard & Poor's may use "+" or "-" to modify ratings. Premium Quality High Quality Medium Quality Medium Grade, Lower Quality Predominantly Speculative Speculative, Low Grade Poor to Default Highest Speculation Lowest Quality, No Interest In Default - In Arrears Questionable Value Standard & Poor's AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC CC C DDD DD D 254 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY BONDS FY 2011-12 Jail Facility Bonds, Series 2000 - Municipal Property Corporation Navajo County received an "A" rating from major rating agencies, Standard & Poor's and Duff & Phelps. The bonds were issued to construct a phased jail facility program to provide the County with a standalone facility that will accommodate the projected inmate populations and comply with all American Correctional Association Standards. The County has covenanted in the 2000 Lease to the extent permitted by State Law and other terms and conditions of the 2000 Lease, that it will use its best efforts to include in its annual budget the Lease Payments due under the 2000 Lease and to make the necessary annual appropriations. The 2000 Lease doesn't constitute an obligation of the County to levy or pledge any form of taxation. Navajo County Pledge Revenue Obligations, Series 2008 Navajo County received an "AAA" rating from the major rating agency, Standard & Poor's. The bonds were issued to finance four projects. The construction of a new County administrative building in Heber-Overgaard, facility renovations and improvements of the water tanks and other facilities at the County Complex in Holbrook, renovations and improvements to the electrical system at the County Complex, and the acquisition of sites, improvement and buildings located in Show Low which will serve as a new regional County Service Center. The obligations are special limited revenue obligations of the County. Payments of debt service are payable solely from and secured by a first lien pledge of revenues form all unrestricted privilege taxes that the County now or hereafter levies. SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 256 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - All Funds Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (All Funds) - $113,913,886 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Taxes Special assessments levied Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeits Interest Contributions Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures $ $ $ $ Accounting Adjustments* 16,446,571 145,175 608,441 44,851,602 2,085,363 1,207,916 292,987 30,996 1,477,913 67,146,964 36,149,544 3,561,496 16,689,388 4,524,096 60,924,524 2011 Adopted Budget $ $ $ $ (1,718,860) 14,070,679 173,886 541,976 48,368,735 3,694,599 1,100,792 228,649 22,500 4,243,216 72,445,032 41,416,623 4,069,187 44,929,449 23,553,180 113,968,439 2011 Actual Amount $ $ $ $ - 17,443,224 333,121 529,230 42,110,370 2,339,359 1,329,900 237,733 24,268 2,326,147 66,673,352 35,870,065 3,618,684 21,923,743 9,733,710 71,146,202 2012 Adopted Budget $ $ $ $ (882,118) 17,282,679 566,195 494,632 52,495,272 3,203,371 1,333,109 377,956 23,000 7,543,012 83,319,226 40,905,148 4,894,993 40,272,069 27,841,676 113,913,886 - Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 4,503,580 (41,523,407) Other Financing Sources & Uses 2,361,194 5,195,729 Net Change in Fund Balances 6,864,774 (36,327,678) (4,995,920) (30,571,761) 29,289,077 36,153,852 36,153,852 31,157,932 Fund Balances, July 1 Fund Balances, June 30 $ 36,153,852 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. (173,826) (5,354,968) (30,594,660) 359,048 $ 31,157,932 22,899 $ 586,171 257 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - General Fund Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (General Fund) - $38,692,033 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Taxes Special assessments levied Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeits Interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues: Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures: $ $ 6,318,161 56,467 454,494 18,228,539 974,612 971,090 52,634 260,276 27,316,272 $ 21,498,185 1,624,657 7,853,113 94,838 31,070,793 Accounting Adjustments* $ $ 6,675,544 117,840 449,976 17,826,469 988,873 910,792 48,065 242,342 27,259,901 $ 23,483,301 1,584,969 13,327,878 451,000 38,847,148 11,107 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other Financing Sources & Uses Net Change in Fund Balances $ $ 6,637,115 121,293 390,496 19,067,601 991,389 938,826 39,408 747,340 28,933,468 $ 21,404,808 1,495,702 7,867,150 294,506 31,062,165 2012 Adopted Budget $ $ 6,872,854 154,603 414,532 19,392,830 873,561 907,509 39,476 785,046 29,440,411 $ 23,020,379 1,637,069 13,296,498 738,087 38,692,033 (367,406) - (3,743,414) (11,587,247) (2,496,103) (9,251,622) 4,568,082 7,788,570 2,019,623 5,251,622 (3,798,677) 2,866,377 $ 2011 Actual Amount - 824,668 Fund Balance, July 1 Fund Balance, June 30 2011 Adopted Budget 3,691,044 (476,480) 3,691,044 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. (107,633) (4,000,000) 3,691,044 $ 3,214,564 3,214,564 $ (785,436) 258 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - Public Works Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (Public Works) - $18,803,157 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Intergovernmental Charges for services Interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues: Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures: $ $ 14,379,239 39,249 69,955 171,305 14,659,747 $ 4,279,345 1,158,880 1,410,918 1,035,351 7,884,493 Accounting Adjustments* 2011 Adopted Budget $ $ 10,478,980 25,000 70,000 50,000 10,623,980 $ 4,526,496 1,152,339 3,105,455 10,663,184 19,447,474 (157,018) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures $ $ 11,596,143 98,695 63,189 119,749 11,877,776 $ 4,265,970 1,189,236 1,829,853 4,948,434 12,233,493 - 6,618,236 Other Financing Sources & Uses 2011 Actual Amount (3,528,645) 2012 Adopted Budget $ $ 11,852,700 400 70,000 50,000 11,973,100 $ 4,580,185 1,228,145 4,629,438 8,365,389 18,803,157 123,916 - (8,823,494) (231,801) (6,830,057) (810,546) (846,817) (701,439) Net Change in Fund Balances 3,089,591 (9,634,040) (1,078,617) (7,531,496) Fund Balance, July 1 6,603,442 9,693,033 9,693,033 8,614,416 Fund Balance, June 30 $ 9,693,033 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. 58,993 $ 8,614,416 $ 1,082,920 259 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - Navajo County Public Health District Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (Health District) - $1,840,055 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Taxes Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Interest Contributions Miscellaneous Total Revenues: Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures: $ $ 2,137,237 153,947 4,110 50,325 20,648 20,759 8,667 2,395,693 $ 1,468,843 70,274 284,210 397,657 2,220,984 2011 Adopted Budget $ $ 2,213,983 92,000 2,500 50,000 5,000 22,500 94,252 2,480,235 $ 1,666,697 74,611 221,470 14,458 1,977,236 2011 Actual Amount $ $ 2,170,261 138,734 3,873 48,481 16,584 14,360 7,122 2,399,415 $ 1,318,333 106,692 277,203 20,530 1,722,758 $ $ 2,042,329 80,100 2,500 83,000 5,000 23,000 14,000 2,249,929 $ 1,423,366 71,050 295,591 50,048 1,840,055 Accounting Adjustments* (26,175) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 148,535 Other Financing Sources & Uses (88,581) (2,622,638) (1,951,884) (1,262,797) 59,954 (2,119,639) (1,266,084) (852,923) 2,116,473 2,116,473 850,388 Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balance, July 1 Fund Balance, June 30 - 2012 Adopted Budget 502,999 2,056,519 $ 2,116,473 9,143 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. (3,166) - 685,800 $ 850,388 409,874 $ (2,535) 260 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - Navajo County Library District Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (Library District) - $522,788 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Taxes Intergovernmental Interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues: Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures: $ 544,375 30,707 3,034 10,884 588,999 $ 215,472 13,599 172,458 79,664 481,193 Accounting Adjustments* $ 563,929 30,888 2,700 11,000 608,517 $ 318,104 19,500 275,904 57,000 670,508 (6,457) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other Financing Sources & Uses Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balance, July 1 Fund Balance, June 30 2011 Adopted Budget $ 554,564 43,827 1,830 4,305 604,526 $ 278,362 15,031 149,787 62,060 505,240 2012 Adopted Budget $ 520,206 86,927 1,000 80,596 688,729 $ 302,521 14,750 143,710 61,807 522,788 - (44,552) 101,349 (61,991) 54,734 165,941 (104,528) (303,129) (345,082) (245,564) (3,179) (365,120) (290,348) (79,623) 363,348 363,348 73,000 366,527 $ 2011 Actual Amount 363,348 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. (1,772) $ 73,000 - $ (6,623) 261 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FY 2011-12 Summary Financial Statements - Non Major Funds Fiscal Years 2010 Through 2012 Total FY12 Adopted Budget (Non Major) - $54,055,853 2010 Actual Amount Revenues: Taxes Special asessments levied Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeits Interest Contributions Miscellaneous Total Revenues: Expenditures: Personal services Supplies Professional services Capital outlay Total Expenditures: $ $7,446,799 $88,708 12,209,007 1,021,178 236,826 146,717 10,237 1,026,781 22,186,252 $ 8,687,700 694,086 6,968,689 2,916,586 19,267,062 2011 Adopted Budget $ $4,617,223 $56,046 20,029,898 2,630,726 190,000 102,884 3,845,622 31,472,399 $ 11,422,025 1,237,768 27,998,742 12,367,538 53,026,073 2011 Actual Amount $ $8,081,283 $211,828 11,398,926 1,200,795 391,074 116,723 9,908 1,447,631 22,858,167 $ 8,602,593 812,023 11,799,750 4,408,180 25,622,546 $ $7,847,290 $411,592 21,160,315 2,246,410 425,600 262,480 6,613,370 38,967,057 $ 11,578,697 1,943,979 21,906,832 18,626,345 54,055,853 Accounting Adjustments* (4,697,530) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (1,778,340) (21,553,674) (3,367,645) (15,088,796) 1,514,867 1,143,472 1,483,208 (3,018,923) (20,410,202) (1,884,437) (18,107,719) 20,290,001 20,290,001 18,405,564 Other Financing Sources & Uses Net Change in Fund Balances (263,473) Fund Balance, July 1 Fund Balance, June 30 - 2012 Adopted Budget 20,553,474 $ 20,290,001 $ * Accounting Adjustments may include prior vs. new fiscal year transitions and non-recurring items. (120,201) (603,266) $ 18,405,564 - $ 297,845 262 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TAX RATES / TAX LEVIES 264 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TAX RATES/TAX LEVIES AUTHORITY CODE DISTRICT AND PURPOSE 02000 02001 Navajo County - (Primary) State of Arizona (Mandated) School Equalization 14900 Navajo County Library District 29999 FY 2011-12 DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX LEVY ASSESSED VALUATION PRIMARY TAX RATE SECONDARY TAX RATE 6,140,405 - 1,026,137,125 1,026,137,125 520,206 1,040,412,117 0.0500 Public Health Service District 2,042,329 1,040,412,117 0.1963 15726 15727 15728 NAVAJO COUNTY FLOOD DISTRICTS Silver Creek Flood Control Protection District Little Colorado Flood Control District Navajo County Flood Control District 48,459 119,258 2,421,589 43,748,860 59,628,931 807,196,274 0.1108 0.2000 0.3000 11900 County Wide Fire District Assistance Tax 1,040,412 1,040,412,117 0.1000 11201 11202 11203 11204 11205 11206 11207 11208 11209 11210 11211 NAVAJO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS Joseph City Fire District Lakeside Fire District Pinetop Fire District Show Low Fire District Heber/Overgaard Fire District White Mountain Lake Fire District Clay Springs Fire District Woodruff Fire District Linden Fire District Sun Valley Fire District McLaws Road Fire District 116,069 2,317,988 3,795,268 3,751,343 1,591,459 537,481 232,286 9,541 1,106,507 60,356 5,107 6,401,965 110,458,727 163,551,301 176,538,176 101,625,766 19,764,297 15,975,845 545,287 39,334,299 1,992,757 1,077,200 1.8130 2.0985 2.3205 2.1249 1.5660 2.7195 1.4540 1.7497 2.8131 3.0288 0.4741 20001 20010 28309 20038 ROAD DISTRICTS Timberland Acres Special Road Dist. #1 Silver Creek County Road Dist. White Mountain Lake Special Road Dist. #2 Victory Heights road maintenance District 70,000 8,400 66,000 16,000 4,904,666 1,124,872 4,801,124 1,112,931 1.4272 0.7468 1.3747 1.4376 21251 21255 SANITARY DISTRICTS Pinetop/Lakeside Sanitary Dist. Heber/Overgaard Sanitary Dist. 441,388 256,100 193,421,625 98,955,515 0.2282 0.2588 28329 Water Improvement Districts Clay Springs Water Improvement District 2,166,196 0.0000 04151 04151 13002 04155 32001 CITIES City of Holbrook - Primary City of Holbrook - Secondary Show Low Street Lighting District City of Winslow - Primary Show Low Bluff Facility District - 55,871 142,686 322,482 122,546 20,032,938 20,100,347 170,881,390 32,856,031 3,451,997 0.5984 0.4259 *** 0.2789 0.0000 0.0835 0.9815 3.5500 265 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y TAX RATES/TAX LEVIES AUTHORITY CODE 08150 08150 07001 07001 07002 07002 07003 07003 07004 07004 07005 07005 07006 07006 07010 07010 07020 07020 07025 07025 07027 07027 07032 07032 30000 30001 07990 07990 07999 07999 DISTRICT AND PURPOSE SCHOOLS Northland Pioneer College - Primary Northland Pioneer College - Secondary Winslow Unified SD #1 - Primary Winslow Unified SD #1 - Secondary Joseph City Unified SD #2 - Primary Joseph City Unified SD #2 - Secondary Holbrook Unified SD #3 - Primary Holbrook Unified SD #3 - Secondary Pinion Unified SD #4 - Primary Pinion Unified SD #4 - Secondary Snowflake Unified SD #5 - Primary Snowflake Unified SD #5 - Secondary Heber-Overgaard SD #6 - Primary Heber-Overgaard SD #6 - Secondary Show Low Unified SD 10 - Primary Show Low Unified SD 10 - Secondary Whiteriver Unified SD #20 - Primary Whiteriver Unified SD #20 - Secondary Cedar Unified SD #25 - Primary Cedar Unified SD #25 -Secondary Kayenta Unified SD #27 - Primary Kayenta Unified SD #27 - Secondary Blue Ridge Unified SD #32 - Primary Blue Ridge Unified SD #32 -Secondary NAVIT - Secondary NATIVE - Secondary Minimum School Tax #2 - Primary Minimum School Tax #2 - Secondary County Education District - Primary County Education District - Secondary FY 2011-12 DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX LEVY 12,710,760 700,510 1,556,735 4,173,693 1,073,477 2,239,132 1,481,164 3,823,489 827,148 2,788,834 811,253 8,817,712 2,429,161 290,667 870,763 8,719,952 3,123,850 510,242 8,323 N/A 26,372 N/A ASSESSED VALUATION 1,026,137,125 1,040,412,117 51,686,699 52,054,259 165,787,221 166,198,695 50,839,670 51,129,293 637,528 637,528 106,432,726 108,549,586 103,527,882 105,508,309 222,883,363 228,047,435 1,499,714 1,499,714 1,792,155 1,792,155 15,998,839 16,007,842 303,524,381 307,495,825 1,020,483,116 16,645,370 165,787,221 N/A 1,491,476 N/A PRIMARY TAX RATE SECONDARY TAX RATE 1.2387 0.0000 1.3553 2.9906 2.5175 0.6459 4.4043 2.8969 0.0000 0.0000 3.5924 0.7620 2.6938 0.7689 3.9562 1.0652 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8168 5.4396 2.8729 1.0159 0.0500 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 1.7682 0.0000 266 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COUNTY PERSONNEL 268 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 General Fund Full Time Equivalent (FTE) by Department The charts below illustrates the history of Navajo County FTE's over the last five years: FY 08 Budget Department Administration/BOS Adult Probation Assessor Clerk of the Court Constables County Attorney Elections Facilities Management Holbrook Justice of the Peace Information Technology Jail Operations Juvenile Detention Juvenile Probation Kayenta Justice of the Peace Legal Defender Pinetop Justice of the Peace Planning & Zoning Public Defender Public Fiduciary Recorder Sheriff Show Low Justice of the Peace Snow flake Justice of the Peace Superintendent of Schools Superior Court Treasurer Voter Registration Winslow Justice of the Peace General Fund Total FY 09 Budget 31.00 10.00 23.00 21.50 6.00 25.10 4.00 21.00 5.00 7.50 40.00 18.00 7.34 2.00 5.00 4.75 16.50 13.00 7.00 3.00 69.50 4.00 5.00 5.00 25.50 6.00 2.00 5.00 392.69 31.00 10.00 21.00 21.50 6.00 25.00 4.00 20.00 5.00 7.50 38.00 18.00 8.00 2.00 5.00 4.75 16.50 13.00 6.00 3.00 64.50 4.00 5.00 5.00 25.50 6.00 2.00 5.00 382.25 FY 10 Budget 31.00 8.72 21.00 21.50 6.00 25.00 4.00 18.00 5.00 7.50 41.50 18.00 7.00 2.00 4.60 4.75 7.25 13.00 6.00 3.00 66.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 25.82 6.00 2.00 5.00 373.64 General Fund FTE History 400.00 390.00 380.00 370.00 360.00 350.00 340.00 330.00 320.00 FY 08 Budget FY 09 Budget FY 10 Budget FY 11 Budget FY 12 Budget FY 11 Budget 30.25 8.50 21.00 21.50 6.00 24.51 4.00 17.25 5.00 7.50 40.50 18.00 7.00 2.00 4.60 4.75 5.65 13.00 6.00 3.00 66.50 4.00 5.00 5.00 24.47 6.00 2.00 5.00 367.98 FY 12 Budget 28.75 8.50 21.00 2.50 6.00 23.22 4.00 17.00 5.00 8.50 40.50 18.00 7.00 2.00 4.45 4.75 5.50 13.00 6.00 4.00 65.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 24.02 6.00 2.00 5.00 345.69 269 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 Total Full Time Equivalent (FTE) by Department and Funding Source FY 08 Budget Administration/BOS General Fund Department of Correction Contract Flood Control Emergency Management Jail Fees Administration/BOS Total Adult Probation General Fund Adult Intensive Probation Services Adult Probation Services Fees Community Punishment Program Community Oriented Policing Services Grant Drug Court Drug Treatment Education Excess Adult Probation Fees Juvenile Criminal Enhancement Fund/Adult Intensive Probation Services State Aid Enhancement Superior Court Adult Probation Total 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.00 FY 08 Budget 10.00 10.50 5.70 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 13.00 1.00 44.20 FY 08 Budget Assessor General Fund Assessor Total 23.00 23.00 FY 08 Budget Clerk of the Court General Fund Child Support IV-D Local Juvenile Criminal Enhancement Fund Document Storage & Retrieval Fill the Gap - State Clerk of the Court Total 21.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 24.00 FY 08 Budget Constables General Fund Constables Total 6.00 6.00 FY 09 Budget 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.00 FY 09 Budget 10.00 10.00 7.20 0.50 0.80 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 17.00 0.00 48.00 FY 09 Budget 21.00 21.00 FY 09 Budget 21.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 24.00 FY 09 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 10 Budget 31.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 FY 10 Budget 8.72 8.00 5.28 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 13.50 0.00 38.50 FY 10 Budget 21.00 21.00 FY 10 Budget 21.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 23.00 FY 10 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 11 Budget 31.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 FY 11 Budget 8.50 8.00 3.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 13.50 0.00 35.00 FY 11 Budget 21.00 21.00 FY 11 Budget 21.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 23.00 FY 11 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 12 Budget 28.75 0.25 0.25 1.25 1.00 31.50 FY 12 Budget 8.50 8.00 4.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 13.50 0.00 36.00 FY 12 Budget 21.00 21.00 FY 12 Budget 21.50 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 22.50 FY 12 Budget 6.00 6.00 270 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 County Attorney General Fund Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Byrne Grant Anti-Gang Prosecution Arizona Domestic Violence Resource Prosecutor Bad Check Program Byrne Grant - Drug Enforcement Child Abuse Child Support Community Gun Violence Criminal Justice Enhancement Department of Public Safety Victims of Crime Act (DPS VOCA) Family Advocacy Fill the Gap - Local High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Justice Assistance Grant Local Solicitation Justice of the Peace Ordinance Juvenile Accountability Project Local Law Enforcement Byrne Grant Misdemeanor Intergovernmental Agreement Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations - Anti - Racketeering Rural Law Enforcement Southw est Border Victim Assistance Victim's Rights County Attorney Total FY 08 Budget 25.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 0.50 13.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 2.00 54.10 FY 08 Budget Elections General Fund Elections Total 4.00 4.00 FY 08 Budget Facilities Managem ent General Fund Emergency Management Federal Detention Contract Public Health District Phone & Commissary Public Works Facilities Managem ent Total 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.00 FY 08 Budget Holbrook Justice of the Peace General Fund Justice of the Peace Ordinance Fee Holbrook JP Total 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 08 Budget Inform ation Technology General Fund Federal Detention Contract Health District Library District Treasurer's Tax System Inform ation Technology Total 7.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 8.00 FY 09 Budget 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 3.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.50 52.81 FY 09 Budget 4.00 4.00 FY 09 Budget 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 21.00 FY 09 Budget 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 09 Budget 7.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 8.00 FY 10 Budget 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 13.00 0.00 3.50 0.87 3.75 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.93 0.76 1.20 61.00 FY 10 Budget 4.00 4.00 FY 10 Budget 18.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 21.00 FY 10 Budget 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 10 Budget 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.50 9.50 FY 11 Budget 24.51 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 13.00 0.00 3.50 0.87 0.00 1.00 17.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.76 1.20 73.26 FY 11 Budget 4.00 4.00 FY 11 Budget 17.25 0.25 1.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 21.00 FY 11 Budget 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 11 Budget 7.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 10.00 FY 12 Budget 23.22 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 2.00 1.23 0.00 1.00 17.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 1.20 71.70 FY 12 Budget 4.00 4.00 FY 12 Budget 17.00 0.50 1.50 1.00 0.50 2.50 23.00 FY 12 Budget 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 12 Budget 8.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 11.00 271 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 FY 08 Budget Jail Operations General Fund Adult Victim's Rights Department of Corrections Contract Federal Detention Contract Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement (GIITEM) Phone & Commissary Winslow Transport Jail Operations Total 40.00 0.67 5.00 33.50 1.00 6.83 0.00 87.00 FY 08 Budget Juvenile Detention General Fund Juvenile Detention Total 18.00 18.00 FY 08 Budget Juvenile Probation General Fund Diversion Consequence Diversion Intake Diversion Fees Juvenile Intense Probation Juvenile Probation Service Diversion Juvenile Probation Services Fees Juvenile Standard Probation Juvenile Treatment Services Safe School Juvenile Probation Total 7.34 0.50 5.00 0.00 6.50 1.00 0.50 2.50 1.50 4.66 29.50 FY 09 Budget 38.00 0.50 5.10 35.50 0.90 6.00 0.00 86.00 FY 09 Budget 18.00 18.00 FY 09 Budget 8.00 0.50 4.00 0.00 6.00 0.50 0.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 27.00 FY 10 Budget 41.50 0.60 5.17 33.50 0.83 7.40 0.00 89.00 FY 10 Budget 18.00 18.00 FY 10 Budget 7.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 3.00 25.00 FY 11 Budget 40.50 0.60 5.25 33.50 0.75 7.40 0.00 88.00 FY 11 Budget 18.00 18.00 FY 11 Budget 7.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0.50 2.50 1.50 0.00 22.00 FY 12 Budget 40.50 0.49 5.25 32.50 0.75 7.51 0.00 87.00 FY 12 Budget 18.00 18.00 FY 12 Budget 7.00 1.00 4.00 0.25 5.50 0.00 0.75 2.50 1.50 0.50 23.00 Total Full Time Equivalent (FTE) by Department and Funding Source FY 08 Budget Kayenta Justice of the Peace General Fund Kayenta JP Total 2.00 2.00 FY 08 Budget Legal Defender General Fund LDO Indigent Assessment Fee Legal Defender Total 5.00 0.00 5.00 FY 08 Budget Navajo County Flood Control Dist. Flood Control District NCFCD Total 3.05 3.05 FY 08 Budget Navajo County Library District Library District FTF Early Childhood Literacy Navajo Co. Library District Total 4.00 0.00 4.00 FY 09 Budget 2.00 2.00 FY 09 Budget 5.00 0.00 5.00 FY 09 Budget 3.00 3.00 FY 09 Budget 4.00 0.00 4.00 FY 10 Budget 2.00 2.00 FY 10 Budget 4.60 0.40 5.00 FY 10 Budget 4.00 4.00 FY 10 Budget 4.50 0.00 4.50 FY 11 Budget 2.00 2.00 FY 11 Budget 4.60 0.40 5.00 FY 11 Budget 3.70 3.70 FY 11 Budget 5.00 1.00 6.00 FY 12 Budget 2.00 2.00 FY 12 Budget 4.45 0.55 5.00 FY 12 Budget 3.75 3.75 FY 12 Budget 4.00 0.75 4.75 272 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 FY 08 Budget Navajo County Public Health District Navajo County Public Health District Bio-Terrorism Community Nurse/New born Early Intervention Family Planning Flouride Varnish Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Immunization Services Injury Prevention Nutrition Nutrition Netw ork Oral Health Prenatal/Maternal Public Health Coronary Smoke Free Arizona Teen Pregnancy Prevention Tobacco Use Prevention Tuberculosis Grant Women, Infants, Children (WIC) NC Public Health District Total 26.18 5.00 0.25 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.65 1.20 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.80 1.00 1.65 0.00 4.25 0.00 6.50 51.76 FY 08 Budget Pinetop Justice of the Peace General Fund Justice of the Peace Ordinance Fee Pinetop JP Total 4.75 1.00 5.75 FY 08 Budget Planning & Zoning General Fund Planning & Zoning Total 16.50 16.50 FY 08 Budget Public Defender General Fund Fill the Gap Local Indigent Assessment Public Defender Total 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 FY 08 Budget Public Fiduciary General Fund Public Fiduciary Total 7.00 7.00 FY 08 Budget Public Works Public Works Waste Tire Disposal Program Public Works Total 89.75 0.00 89.75 FY 09 Budget 26.18 3.25 0.25 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.65 1.21 1.50 2.75 0.00 0.79 1.00 1.40 2.00 4.50 0.25 6.00 52.01 FY 09 Budget 4.75 1.00 5.75 FY 09 Budget 16.50 16.50 FY 09 Budget 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 FY 09 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 09 Budget 87.50 3.00 90.50 FY 10 Budget 28.13 3.25 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.16 0.50 1.21 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.79 1.00 1.90 2.00 3.50 0.25 6.00 51.45 FY 10 Budget 4.75 1.00 5.75 FY 10 Budget 7.25 7.25 FY 10 Budget 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 FY 10 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 10 Budget 78.00 3.25 81.25 FY 11 Budget 29.23 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.21 0.50 2.50 0.00 0.79 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.50 0.00 7.50 53.49 FY 11 Budget 4.75 1.00 5.75 FY 11 Budget 5.65 5.65 FY 11 Budget 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 FY 11 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 11 Budget 77.65 3.25 80.90 FY 12 Budget 28.05 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.55 1.00 0.00 4.20 1.00 0.00 0.80 0.85 2.50 3.50 0.00 7.50 53.95 FY 12 Budget 4.75 1.00 5.75 FY 12 Budget 5.50 5.50 FY 12 Budget 13.00 1.00 1.00 15.00 FY 12 Budget 6.00 6.00 FY 12 Budget 79.50 2.25 81.75 273 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 FY 08 Budget Recorder General Fund Document Storage Recorder Total 3.00 1.00 4.00 FY 08 Budget Sheriff General Fund Adult Victim's Rights Boating Safety Community Oriented Policing Services Meth Grant Dispatching Local Department of Corrections/Bureau of Prisons Contracts Drug Enforcement Emergency Services Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement (GIITEM) H/O School Resource Officer High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Paw n Transaction Fees Rural Law Enforcement Sheriff Total 69.50 0.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.80 FY 08 Budget Show Low Justice of the Peace General Fund Justice of the Peace Ordinance Fee Show Low JP Total 4.00 1.00 5.00 FY 08 Budget Snow flake Justice of the Peace General Fund Justice of the Peace Ordinance Fee Snow flake Justice Court - FTG Snow flake JP Total 5.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 FY 08 Budget Superintendent of Schools General Fund Superintendent of Schools Total 5.00 5.00 FY 08 Budget Superior Court General Fund Aztec Field Trainer CASA Child Support Child Support Visitation Fund Conciliation Court Fees Court Improvement Drug Enforcement Grant Fill the Gap Noticing & Court Clerk - Fill the Gap Superior Court Total 25.50 0.50 1.50 1.90 0.13 0.60 0.50 0.00 5.00 0.00 35.63 FY 09 Budget 3.00 1.00 4.00 FY 09 Budget 64.50 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.00 FY 09 Budget 4.00 1.00 5.00 FY 09 Budget 5.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 FY 09 Budget 5.00 5.00 FY 09 Budget 25.50 0.50 1.50 0.90 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.25 3.25 0.00 32.65 FY 10 Budget 3.00 1.00 4.00 FY 10 Budget 66.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00 FY 10 Budget 4.00 1.00 5.00 FY 10 Budget 5.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 FY 10 Budget 5.00 5.00 FY 10 Budget 25.82 0.43 1.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 2.75 0.00 33.00 FY 11 Budget 3.00 1.00 4.00 FY 11 Budget 66.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.00 FY 11 Budget 4.00 1.00 5.00 FY 11 Budget 5.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 FY 11 Budget 5.00 5.00 FY 11 Budget 24.47 0.43 1.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.53 2.82 0.00 32.00 FY 12 Budget 4.00 0.00 4.00 FY 12 Budget 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.25 2.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.50 1.00 75.25 FY 12 Budget 4.00 1.00 5.00 FY 12 Budget 5.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 FY 12 Budget 5.00 5.00 FY 12 Budget 24.02 0.43 1.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.48 2.32 0.00 31.00 274 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y COUNTY PERSONNEL FY 2011-12 SCHEDULES A - F 276 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE A FY 2011-12 277 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE B FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary of Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information Fiscal Year 2012 2011 1. Maximum allowable primary property tax levy. A.R.S. §42-17051(A) 2012 $ 5,900,775 $ 6,018,791 $ 5,900,775 $ 5,970,898 $ 1,127,857 2,644,314 126,629 563,929 2,213,983 $ 1,200,000 3,038,839 126,629 520,206 2,042,329 $ 6,676,712 $ 6,928,003 $ 12,577,487 $ 12,898,901 $ 5,553,140 284,781 5,837,921 $ 5,092,015 314,220 5,406,235 $ 11,244,156 $ 0.5572 $ 0.5984 2. Amount received from primary property taxation in the current year in excess of the sum of that year's maximum allowable primary property tax levy. A.R.S. §42-17102(A)(18) 3. Property tax levy amounts A. Primary property taxes B. Secondary property taxes Fire District Assistance Tax Fund Navajo County Flood Control District Little Colorado River Flood Control Zone Navajo County Library District Public Health Services District Total secondary property taxes C. Total property tax levy amounts 4. Property taxes collected* A. Primary property taxes (1) Current year's levy (2) Prior years‘ levies (3) Total primary property taxes B. Secondary property taxes (1) Current year's levy (2) Prior years‘ levies (3) Total secondary property taxes C. Total property taxes collected 5. Property tax rates A. County tax rate (1) Primary property tax rate (2) Secondary property tax rate Fire District Assistance Tax Fund Silver Creek Flood Protection District Little Colorado River Flood Control Zone Navajo County Flood Control District Navajo County Library District Public Health Services District (3) Total county tax rate 0.1000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.0500 0.1963 $ 1.5035 0.1000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.0500 0.1963 $ 1.5447 278 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE B FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary of Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information Fiscal Year 2012 B. Special assessment district tax rates Secondary property tax rates Beaver Dam CRID - DS Clay Springs DWID - Operating Drifting Snow Loop CRID - DS Porter Mountain DWID - DS Silver Creek Flood Protection District Silver Creek CRID - Operating Sutter Drive CRID - DS White Mountain Lake Co. Rec. ID - Op White Mountain Summer Home DWID - DS Wild Cat Way CRID - DS Madison Lane Circle CRID - DS Timberlake Acres Special RID - DS White Mountain Lake #2 Special RID - DS Victory Heights Road Maintenance Dist. Scott's Pine Tract A CRID Shumway Road CRID Bucking Horse Improvement District North Whistle Stop Loop CRID Wonderland Acres DWID Fawnbrook DWID Mountain View Improvement District Total Special Assessment Districts $ $ 358 8,766 46,920 15,000 26,971 154,459 115,160 4,353 70,000 66,000 16,000 12,662 126,800 70,630 11,180 28,504 166,833 21,360 961,956 $ $ 358 8,766 46,920 15,000 26,971 154,459 115,160 4,353 70,000 66,000 16,000 12,662 126,800 70,630 11,180 28,504 166,833 21,360 961,956 279 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE C FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Fund Type of Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2012 SOURCE OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND Taxes Personal Property Taxes Interest on Delinquent Taxes Penalties on Delinquent Taxes Total Taxes ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011 2011 2012 122,475 703,841 70,928 897,244 $ 322,239 127,737 449,976 $ 8,879,038 5,406,903 2,018,428 1,170,000 469,940 17,944,309 $ $ $ 551,251 277,447 160,175 988,873 Fines and forfeits Court Fines and Forfeits $ Investments Interest on Investments Licenses and Permits Planning & Zoning Other Licenses & Permits Total Licenses and permits Intergovernmental State Shared Sales Tax County Sales Tax VLT Auto Lieu Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Other Intergovernmental Total Intergovernmental Charges for services Court Fees Assessor/Recorder/Treasurer Fees Other Charges for Services Total Charges for services Miscellaneous Proceeds from Sale of Assets Miscellaneous Total Miscellaneous Total General Fund $ ESTIMATED REVENUES 114,182 710,210 77,606 901,998 $ 275,401 115,095 390,496 $ 9,285,088 5,846,576 1,985,572 1,341,507 730,151 19,188,894 $ $ $ 605,543 273,951 111,895 991,389 $ 497,300 273,951 102,310 873,561 910,792 $ 938,826 $ 907,509 $ 48,065 $ 39,408 $ 39,476 $ $ $ 13,765 747,340 761,105 $ $ 25,000 242,342 267,342 $ 12,908 785,046 797,954 $ 21,506,601 $ 23,212,116 $ 23,482,421 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 114,182 710,168 77,606 901,956 299,438 115,094 414,532 9,563,641 6,021,973 2,045,139 1,053,000 863,680 19,547,433 280 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE C FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Fund Type of Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2012 SOURCE OF REVENUES SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Public Works Road Fund Highway User Revenue Fund VLT Auto Lieu Other PW Road Fund Revenues Total Public Works Road Fund Health Services District Fund Health Services District Total Health Services District Fund $ ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011 2011 2012 $ $ 7,902,372 2,500,000 1,881,381 12,283,753 $ $ 7,534,514 2,486,020 185,503 10,206,037 $ 7,450,000 2,250,000 2,273,100 11,973,100 $ $ 266,252 266,252 $ $ 200,941 200,941 $ $ 207,600 207,600 $ 8,010,358 4,031,566 1,338,055 127,316 Other Funds by Function General Government (1) Administration County Attorney Courts Public Defense Public Safety (2) Sheriff's Office/Jail Juvenile Detention Probation Emergency Management Flood Control District Highways & Streets (3) Public Works Grants Special Districts Health and Welfare (5) Public Health Grants Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Culture and Recreation (6) Library District Recreation Education (7) Superintendent of Schools Recreation Environmental and Conservation (8) Natural Resources Programs Economic Development (9) Community Development Total Other Special Revenue Funds $ 8,631,205 $ 10,370,437 $ 68,534 28,080,552 Total Special Revenue Funds $ 21,181,210 $ 20,777,415 $ 40,261,252 5,696,912 7,717,167 6,023,502 1,000 2,466,359 1,226,498 393,200 840,679 700,002 396,288 72,215 1,520,702 1,246,059 1,992,560 1,128,791 95,293 51,290 282,459 156,851 95,293 51,290 175,772 206,554 - 140,725 450,403 13,500 365,000 281 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE C FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Fund Type of Revenues Other Than Property Taxes Fiscal Year 2012 SOURCE OF REVENUES DEBT SERVICE FUNDS General Government Public Safety - Jail Highways & Streets - Special Districts Total Debt Service Funds $ $ ESTIMATED REVENUES ACTUAL REVENUES* ESTIMATED REVENUES 2011 2011 2012 175,772 206,554 382,326 $ $ 140,725 450,403 649,044 1,240,173 $ $ 419,505 550,423 969,928 $ $ 63,809 5,000,000 271,615 384,208 5,719,632 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS General Government Public Safety - Jail Health & Welfare - Show Low Health Highways & Streets - Special Districts Total Capital Projects Funds $ $ - $ $ PERMANENT FUNDS N/A Total Permanent Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - ENTERPRISE FUNDS N/A Total Enterprise Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 43,070,137 $ 649,044 649,044 45,878,748 $ 70,433,233 * Includes actual revenues recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated revenues for the remainder of the fiscal year. 282 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE D FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Fund Type of Other Financing Sources/ and Interfund Transfers Fiscal Year 2012 FUND GENERAL FUND 110109 - Grants Administration 110121 - IT Communications 110191 - NC Health Insurance Trust 210109 - Grant Reserve 210124 - Tax Management System 213214 - Legal Defender FTG 213332 - Public Defender Fees 229460 - NC Flood Control District 229461 - LCR Flood Control Zone 230400 - Public Works 250600 - NC Health Services District 250602 - Bio-Terrorism 250612 - Tobacco Use Prevention 261800 - Library District 210109 - Grant Reserve 224245 - Family Counseling 227432 - Emergency Management 227432 - Emergency Management 227432 - Emergency Management 250600 - NC Health Services District 410124 - 2008 Series Revenue Bonds Total General Fund SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 110121 - IT Communications 110121 - IT Communications 110121 - IT Communications 110121 - IT Communications 110121 - IT Communications 210109 - Grant Reserve 210124 - Tax Management System 211201 - Fill the Gap Funds 211225 - Aztec Field Trainer 211999 - SCA Indigent Assessment 212309 - IV-D Child Support 224245 - Family Counseling 227432 - Emergency Management 227432 - Emergency Management 250600 - NC Health Services District 110103 - Bureau of Prisons Contract 110109 - Grants Administration 110121 - IT Communications OTHER FINANCING 2012 SOURCES $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2012 IN - $ - $ - $ 322,681 6,921 1,025,026 3,896,821 8,316 5,000 10,000 214,528 14,311 678,399 461,467 17,206 13,384 245,564 6,919,624 $ 23,040 15,840 4,675 8,259 12,505 190,599 15,000 355,595 7,000 28,798 398,645 4,285 61,328 25,713 211,175 - $ $ (190,599) (4,285) (15,840) (61,328) (25,713) (211,175) (1,171,970) (1,680,910) (633,100) (322,681) (6,921) 283 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE D FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Fund Type of Other Financing Sources/ and Interfund Transfers Fiscal Year 2012 FUND 110191 - NC Health Insurance Trust 210109 - Grant Reserve 210113 - Treasurer's Surcharge (TIF) 210124 - Tax Management System 211211 - Fill the Gap Local 211211 - Fill the Gap Local 212302 - IV-D Child Support SSRE 213214 - Legal Defender FTG 213227 - Indigent Assessment Fee 229460 - NC Flood Control District 229461 - LCR Flood Control Zone 230400 - Public Works 250600 - NC Health Services District 250600 - NC Health Services District 250600 - NC Health Services District 250602 Bio-Terrorism 250606 - Women, Infants & Children 250612 - Tobacco Use Prevention 261800 - Library District 213227 - PD Indigent Assessment Fee Total Special Revenue Funds DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 410122 - 2000 Series Jail Bonds 410124 - 2008 Series Revenue Bonds Total Debt Service Funds OTHER FINANCING 2012 SOURCES - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2012 IN (1,025,026) (3,896,821) (15,000) (8,316) (355,595) (7,000) (398,645) (5,000) (28,798) (214,528) (14,311) (701,439) (12,505) (461,467) (1,000,000) (17,206) (12,934) (13,384) (245,564) (10,000) $ 1,362,457 $ (9,406,241) $ $ $ 633,100 1,171,970 1,805,070 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ $ - $ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 350649 - Show Low Health Total Capital Projects Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ PERMANENT FUNDS N/A Total Permanent Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - ENTERPRISE FUNDS N/A Total Enterprise Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ - $ - $ 11,087,151 $ (11,087,151) 284 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE E FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Within Each Fund Type Fiscal Year 2012 FUND/DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND Adult Probation BOS/Administration Assessor Facilities Management Capital Outlay Clerk of the Court Contingency County Attorney Construction Projects Elections Holbrook Constable Holbrook Justice Court Indigent Health Jail Operations Juvenile Detention Juvenile Probation Kayenta Constable Kayenta Justice Court Legal Defender Information Technology County-wide Planning and Zoning Pinetop Constable Pinetop Justice Court Public Defender Public Fiduciary Recorder School Superintendent Sheriff Show Low Constable Show Low Justice Court Snowflake Constable Snowflake Justice Court Superior Court Treasurer Voter Registration Winslow Constable Winslow Justice Court Total General Fund ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ $ 611,872 2,536,883 1,317,460 2,008,406 450,000 1,332,774 4,000,000 2,136,123 629,174 26,476 336,996 3,398,400 3,191,142 1,101,304 460,494 56,413 111,298 379,084 775,917 1,531,235 423,306 59,872 346,873 1,066,341 445,583 283,810 338,286 4,998,920 47,734 287,638 49,234 379,252 2,719,058 447,327 200,362 50,284 311,817 38,847,148 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* 2011 $ $ 552,398 2,105,130 1,183,609 1,602,128 263,013 1,102,638 2,177,739 11,279 495,971 25,374 370,333 2,790,796 2,947,873 1,074,376 423,613 38,408 104,904 364,496 565,515 1,497,515 355,443 52,328 334,254 765,768 388,398 235,206 318,284 4,642,520 45,746 282,095 37,467 377,343 2,483,979 416,584 143,579 37,320 313,574 30,926,996 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 613,511 2,495,809 1,317,460 1,960,225 700,000 1,266,734 4,000,000 2,136,123 448,090 26,693 334,072 3,398,400 3,152,747 1,095,947 474,687 61,045 108,582 374,906 860,917 1,531,235 382,169 59,779 345,717 1,025,757 445,583 309,818 339,829 4,954,315 47,734 290,398 49,183 380,980 2,713,405 442,667 188,474 45,579 313,463 38,692,033 285 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE E FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Within Each Fund Type Fiscal Year 2012 FUND/DEPARTMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BOS/Administration Adult Probation Assessor Capital Outlay Clerk of the Court County Attorney Elections Flood Control District Health District Holbrook Justice Court Information Technology Jail Operations Juvenile Detention Juvenile Probation Kayenta Justice Court Legal Defender Library District Personnel Commission Pinetop Justice Court Public Defender Public Works Recorder Sheriff Show Low Justice Court Snowflake Justice Court Superior Court Treasurer Winslow Justice Court Workforce Investment Act Total Special Revenue Funds ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ $ 10,007,417 2,246,120 174,947 257,002 6,534,061 397,708 10,811,781 4,237,752 68,016 389,241 5,131,457 9,339 1,197,542 6,681 82,714 772,197 14,573 18,473 481,578 23,387,781 244,502 1,205,702 31,711 17,580 1,487,205 50,461 49,321 1,085,504 70,398,366 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* 2011 $ $ 8,092,887 1,581,094 97,251 51,859 67,162 2,270,156 19,925 900,942 3,073,095 18,284 222,329 2,833,876 875 861,052 5,440 33,287 584,186 9,162 8,661 175,664 14,527,209 65,624 766,308 17,827 522,505 9,029 8,894 277,641 37,102,224 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 7,061,773 2,006,383 180,021 244,240 5,737,674 499,923 13,309,856 4,082,041 63,894 458,689 6,385,747 9,012 1,209,742 1,336 84,315 627,346 10,580 14,779 361,550 20,023,986 219,784 1,908,547 21,015 29,155 1,574,486 54,660 105,595 1,303,818 67,589,947 286 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE E FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Within Each Fund Type Fiscal Year 2012 FUND/DEPARTMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 2000 Series Jail Bonds 2008 Series Revenue Bonds Special District Bonds Total Debt Service Funds ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 816,985 714,710 701,222 2,232,917 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS N/A Total Capital Project Funds $ $ 2,532,273 2,532,273 PERMANENT FUNDS N/A Total Permanent Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - ENTERPRISE FUNDS N/A Total Enterprise Funds $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES* 2011 $ 114,010,704 $ $ 648,260 593,460 684,101 1,925,821 $ 633,100 585,985 1,015,621 2,234,706 $ $ 586,009 586,009 $ $ 5,397,200 5,397,200 $ 70,541,050 $ 113,913,886 * Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. 287 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND BOS/Administration General Fund - 110101 Suspense Account - 110106 Grants Administration - 110109 Economic Development - 110110 Health Insurance Trust - 110191 Grant Reserve - 210109 SRS - Forest Fees - 210125 Hazmat Grants - 210361 Homeland Security - 210365 Emergency Preparedness - 210366 DOJ Equipment Exercises - 210619 Natural Disasters - 227430 Emergency Management - 227432 White Mountain Lake Recreation - 260702 Environmental Programs - 280464 EECBG DE-SC0002668 ARRA - 280466 Coop Ext Environmental Programs - 280908 Forestry Fire Recovery Projects - 280903 CDBG 2003 - 291961 CDBG 156-08 - 291963 CDBG 152-08 - 291964 CDBG 154-08 Pinetop - 291965 CDBG 153-08 Fairgrounds - 291967 OSW Suspense Account - 910106 Fire District Assistance Tax - 923120 Fiduciary Client Services - 952101 School Equalization - 970851 Department Total Facilities Maintenance General Fund - 110101 Department Total Elections General Fund - 110101 Special Election - 110115 HAVA Block Grant - 210114 Fed DHHS Elections - 210115 HAVA Elections - 210194 Department Total ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 $ $ 2,536,883 334,759 17,413 3,267,845 2,428,356 1,500 385,020 4,690 14,372 241,867 355,430 279 2,576 35,102 1,209,788 1,708,420 12,544,300 $ $ $ $ BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 2,105,130 7,185 14,369 14,108 910,654 3,000 217,472 82,276 152,007 2,795 165,508 (1,800) 25,932 9,000 1,116,355 1,851 5,372,175 10,198,017 $ 2,495,809 34,527 10,000 2,833 342,173 1,500 414,611 2,600 1,000,000 174,082 234,405 49,943 220,133 262,566 250,000 280 7,217 11,557 2,576 2,467 35,610 1,200,000 2,693 2,800,000 9,557,582 2,008,406 2,008,406 $ $ 1,602,128 1,602,128 $ $ 1,960,225 1,960,225 629,174 177,617 210,455 9,636 1,026,882 $ 495,971 4,000 13,621 1,813 491 515,896 $ 448,090 100,000 179,565 211,130 9,228 948,013 $ $ 288 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Planning & Zoning General Fund - 110101 Department Total Recorder General Fund - 110101 General Fund - Voter Registration Document Storage & Retrieval - 210111 HAVA Recorder - 210193 Department Total Assessor General Fund - 110101 Property Information S&R - 210112 Affidavit of Residency - 210116 Department Total Information Technology General Fund - 110101 IT Communications - 110121 Tax Management System - 210124 Department Total Treasurer General Fund - 110101 Taxpayer Information Fund - 210113 Department Total Personnel Commission Personnel Commission - 110107 Department Total Library District Library - 261800 State Grants in Aid - 261801 White Mountain Apache State Grants - 261804 Private Grants - 261814 LSTA Careering - 261820 Early Literacy Enhancement - 261821 Library Tech Expos & The Latest 261822 LSTA Dewey Meets Droid - 261823 Senior Trips Down Memory Lane 261824 FTF Early Childhood Literacy - 261825 Special Resource Allotment - 261826 DVD's Anywhere - 261827 AZ Centennial - 261828 Department Total ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 423,306 423,306 $ $ 355,443 355,443 $ $ 382,169 382,169 $ 283,810 200,362 133,548 110,954 728,674 $ 235,206 143,579 54,569 11,055 444,409 $ 309,818 188,474 109,786 109,998 718,076 1,317,460 174,947 1,492,407 $ 1,183,609 97,251 1,280,860 $ 775,917 202,567 186,674 1,165,158 $ 565,515 151,726 70,603 787,844 $ $ $ 416,584 9,029 425,613 $ $ 447,327 50,461 497,788 $ 442,667 54,660 497,327 $ $ 14,573 14,573 $ $ 9,162 9,162 $ $ 10,580 10,580 $ 670,508 24,948 8,066 191 286 3,989 6,897 7,312 50,000 772,197 $ 504,248 22,644 1,338 6,152 811 6,441 7,490 30,026 5,036 584,186 $ 522,788 23,000 729 1,559 60,000 2,500 16,770 627,346 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,317,460 80,021 100,000 1,497,481 860,917 245,304 213,385 1,319,606 289 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 DEPARTMENT/FUND ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 Contingency General Fund - 110101 Department Total $ $ 4,000,000 4,000,000 $ $ County-wide General Fund - 110101 Department Total $ $ 1,531,235 1,531,235 $ $ Public Fiduciary General Fund - 110101 Department Total $ $ 445,583 445,583 $ Juvenile Detention General Fund - 110101 Phone Service - 225251 Department Total Legal Defender General Fund - 110101 Fill the Gap State- 213205 Fill the Gap - Local - 213214 Legal Defender Training - 213341 LDO Indigent Assessment - 213342 Department Total County Attorney General Fund - 110101 Southwest Border Patrol - 110102 County JP Ordinance - 211298 AZ DV Resource Prosecutor - 212201 Fill the Gap State - 212203 Fill the Gap Local - 212212 Victim's Rights - 212305 Child Abuse - 212306 Bad Check Program - 212307 Victim Assistance - 212308 Child Support IV-D - 212309 CJEF - 212311 Crime Victim Compensation - 212312 State Crime Victim Comp Interest - 212313 $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,497,515 1,497,515 $ $ 1,531,235 1,531,235 $ $ 388,398 388,398 $ $ 445,583 445,583 1,101,304 9,339 1,110,643 $ 1,074,376 875 1,075,251 $ 1,095,947 9,012 1,104,959 379,084 646 12,563 20,339 49,166 461,798 $ 364,496 1,525 3,225 3,006 25,531 397,783 $ 2,136,123 130,396 329,413 49,701 322,550 73,405 39,459 39,500 32,161 947,905 292,830 65,372 9,815 $ 2,177,739 86,933 296,162 14,962 37,069 39,586 8,134 59,759 26,697 723,943 119,719 79,012 4,796 $ $ $ - BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 374,906 4,929 13,390 23,823 42,173 459,221 2,136,123 10,705 361,060 105,608 31,456 276,852 43,657 39,307 44,900 833,924 291,291 75,000 1,400 290 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Fed DPS VOCA - 212314 Byrne Drug Enforcement - 212315 Anti-Racketeering - 212316 Fed VOCA Comp - 212317 State Comp Restitution 212318 State Comp Subrogation - 212319 Rural Law Enforcement - 212320 Diversion Restitution - 212321 JAG Local Solicitation - 212323 ACJC Byrne ARRA - 212324 Prosecution Cost Recovery Fund - 212325 Illegal Employer Sanction - 212326 Victim's Rights Week - 212327 State Comp Donations - 212328 National Children's Alliance - 212329 HIDTA - 212330 SFSF-County Dist ARRA - 212331 APAAC Training - 212332 Municipal Misdemeanor IGA - 212333 Child Support IV-D Incentive Department Total Superior Court Administration General Fund - 110101 Fill the Gap - 211200 Fill the Gap State - 211201 5% Fill the Gap Local - 211210 FTG Local - Indigent Defense - 211215 Drug Court - 211224 Aztec Trainer - 211225 Conciliation Court Fees - 211226 CASA - 211232 Child Support Visitation - 211235 Domestic Relations - 211249 Access & Visitation - 211257 Court Improvement - 211260 Law Library - 211261 Spousal Maintenance - 211268 FARE Distribution - 211275 Interstate Compact Transport Fee - 211276 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 40,412 44,913 511,059 47,135 78,718 6,549 132,093 67,835 170,817 163,222 5,389 76,930 4,608 24,973 2,826,901 $ 8,670,184 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 41,349 (19) 289,683 18,269 74,301 7,160 60,781 123,285 7,330 1,675 143,200 6,370 $ 4,447,895 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 51,039 1,049,277 37,860 76,556 7,001 58,340 76,386 110,603 117,040 9,612 96,602 7,867 2,637 2,474 1,515,355 68,580 31,231 205,386 98,668 $ 7,873,797 $ $ $ 2,719,058 3 458,637 237,326 17,927 32,176 37,627 160,391 89,019 108,247 84,710 2,334 26,974 89,506 11,088 29,971 16,169 2,483,979 (15,003) 232,232 26,621 27,309 33,183 86,799 1,200 3,044 27,092 27,501 2,092 - 2,713,405 7 374,604 230,705 22,874 51,557 82,324 154,637 90,324 127,880 97,037 7,632 26,218 119,008 13,309 31,256 33,070 291 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Court Admin Fees - 211307 Drug Enforcement - 211315 Eradication - 211353 SCA Indigent Assessment - 211999 Department Total Public Defender General Fund - 110101 Fill the Gap - 213204 Fill the Gap Local - 213213 Indigent Assessment Fee - 213227 Public Defender Training - 213331 Public Defender Fees - 213332 PDO Indigent Assessment 213333 Byrne Grant - 213343 Department Total Clerk of the Superior Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211244 IV-D Case Processing - 211250 Document Storage - 211262 Department Total Juvenile Probation General Fund - 110101 Diversion Intake - 224227 JIPS - 224228 Juvenile Standard Probation - 224229 Juvenile Probation Fees - 224233 Family Counseling - 224245 Juvenile Treatment Services - 224253 Diversion Consequence - 224254 Juvenile Crime Reduction - 224255 Juvenile Probation Service Diversion - 224264 Excess Juvenile Probation Fees - 224265 Excess Juvenile Diversion Fees - 224266 JCRF - 224273 Safe Schools 224247 Safe Schools Heber 224276 Safe Schools Snowflake 224278 Department Total ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 165 47,881 6,245 30,809 $ 4,206,263 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 70,435 $ 3,006,484 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 167 43,453 7,680 60,744 $ 4,287,891 $ 1,066,341 145,008 89,950 63,381 183,239 1,547,919 $ 765,768 72,221 5,951 17,893 6,841 64,526 8,232 941,432 $ 1,332,774 124,844 11,129 121,029 1,589,776 $ 1,102,638 29,541 37,621 1,169,800 $ 460,494 226,053 303,253 199,064 162,208 21,320 118,028 59,193 32 32,649 29,699 11,787 34,041 184 31 1,658,036 $ 423,613 220,225 215,460 163,010 48,189 21,246 78,977 56,162 7,512 27,989 22,282 1,284,665 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,025,757 9,784 76,547 49,738 95,263 32,994 96,684 540 1,387,307 1,266,734 121,277 11,212 111,751 1,510,974 474,687 230,006 279,095 183,231 172,335 21,273 129,715 63,082 32,481 32,607 11,983 30,431 23,503 1,684,429 292 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Adult Probation General Fund - 110101 AIPS - 223230 State Aid Enhancement - 223231 Adult GPS - 223234 Community Punishment - 223237 Drug Treatment Education - 223252 Interstate Compact Fees - 223256 Adult Probation Fees - 223267 Excess Adult Probation Fees - 223276 Drug Court Fees - 223300 Probation Treatment Programs - 223301 Department Total Jail Operations General Fund - 110101 Federal BOP Contract - 110103 State DOC Contract - 110104 Commissary/Phone - 110123 Jail Enhancement - 220359 Department Total Sheriff General Fund - 110101 Dom Cannabis Eradicate - 220351 Bullet Proof Vests - 220356 Boating Safety - 220357 Drug Enforcement - 220360 Federal RICO - 220362 LETPP - 220363 Emergency Preparedness - 220366 Peace Officer Training - 220367 Victim's Rights - 220368 GITEM - 220383 DUI Enforcement - 220385 K-9 Program - 220386 COPs Meth - 220388 Local IGA's - 220389 Admin Fees/Vehicles - 220392 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ $ $ $ $ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 611,872 467,248 892,480 44 128,377 80,516 9,916 74,618 581,256 11,665 2,857,992 $ 3,191,142 2,936,925 1,299,535 474,664 420,333 8,322,599 $ 4,998,920 2,000 8,000 79,320 520,019 357 18,563 39,073 403 146 77,683 51,299 $ $ $ BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 552,398 335,337 838,122 69,317 24,563 37,530 270,666 5,559 2,133,492 $ 2,947,873 1,433,349 909,025 284,919 206,583 5,781,749 $ 4,642,520 2,000 3,966 18 (364) 170,541 8,995 18,441 34,655 25,595 26,706 28,590 22,145 $ $ $ 613,511 356,591 773,275 43 131,105 80,509 18,397 35,300 598,853 11,810 500 2,619,894 3,152,747 4,960,262 392,747 605,785 426,953 9,538,494 4,954,315 1,515 2,510 268,373 429,779 373 4,690 402 18,944 39,241 18,117 508 151,790 61,111 293 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND NATC Driving - 220393 ACJC Byrne AARA - 220394 Pawn Transaction Fee - 220395 NCSO Honor Guard - 220396 Southwest Border HIDTA - 220397 False Alarm Fees - 220398 JAG Local Solicitation - 220399 SFSF Public Safety - 220400 Rural Law Enforcement ARRA - 220401 Boating Enforcement Overtime - 220402 HIDTA - Domestic Hwy Enforcement - 220403 HIDTA Native Amer Proj - 220404 AATA Operation Hot Rod - 220405 HIDTA HINTS - 220406 Jail Fees Ordinance - 221100 Department Total Holbrook Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211238 Department Total Winslow Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211239 Department Total Snowflake Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211240 Department Total Show Low Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211241 Department Total Pinetop Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211242 Department Total ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 40,809 283,080 74,950 10,000 $ 6,204,622 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 247,672 29,098 3,933 75,011 735 20,197 3,598 36,737 2,170 3,248 2,621 $ 5,408,828 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 41,161 115,259 7,629 152,779 11,486 65,035 17,864 8,821 8,879 23,920 38,474 419,887 $ 6,862,862 $ 336,996 68,016 405,012 $ 370,333 18,284 388,617 $ 311,817 49,321 361,138 $ 313,574 8,894 322,468 $ 379,252 17,580 396,832 $ 377,343 377,343 $ 287,638 31,711 319,349 $ 282,095 17,827 299,922 $ 346,873 18,473 365,346 $ 334,254 8,661 342,915 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 334,072 63,894 397,966 313,463 105,595 419,058 380,980 29,155 410,135 290,398 21,015 311,413 345,717 14,779 360,496 294 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Kayenta Justice Court General Fund - 110101 JCEF - 211243 Department Total Public Works Public Works - 230400 Waste Tire Disposal - 230401 Reservation Roads - 230402 White Mountain Trans - 230404 LTAF II - 230405 Senior Center Fuel - 230406 Navajo Nation Road Yards - 230407 Special District Revolving Fund - 231500 Silver Creek CRID - 231514 Bucking Horse ID - 231526 Victory Heights - 231532 Mountain View CRID - 231556 North Whistle CRID - 231557 Wonderland Acres DWID - 241511 Timberland Acres DWID - 241512 Claysprings DWID - 241513 Overgaard Townsite DWID - 241529 Department Total Capital Outlay General Fund - 110101 Show Low Complex - 310101 Department Total Debt Service 2000 Series Jail Bond - 410122 2008 Series Pledged Revenue Bonds - 410124 Fawnbrook - 431515 Sutter Drive - 431517 Drifting Snow Loop - 431519 Madison Lane - 431521 Scott's Pine Meadow - 431523 Shumway Road - 431524 Bucking Horse - 431526 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 111,298 6,681 117,979 $ 19,447,474 333,218 110,880 52,146 166,210 25,000 2,269,492 288,946 86,201 264,855 33,975 201,925 22,490 37,287 12,054 933 34,695 23,387,781 $ 450,000 450,000 $ 816,985 714,710 42,514 22,412 9,329 44,216 137,762 65,000 $ $ $ $ BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 104,904 5,440 110,344 $ 11,985,336 186,369 110,063 10,897 240,628 2,672 1,811,821 8,806 12,309 158,268 40 14,527,209 $ 263,013 51,859 314,872 $ 648,260 593,460 75,396 32,627 3,713 15,279 135,173 88,268 $ $ $ $ 108,582 1,336 109,918 18,803,157 255,437 224,640 54,348 6,308 6,180 178,227 327,337 82,849 37,612 12,198 998 34,695 20,023,986 700,000 700,000 633,100 585,985 109,197 36,160 2,413 9,133 17,048 267,838 161,703 295 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Hiawatha Trail - 431533 Wild Cat Way - 431534 Beaver Dam - 431539 Misty Mountain DWID - 431545 Hilltop Drive - 431555 Mountain View - 431556 North Whistle Stop Loop - 431557 Wonderland Acres - 441511 White Mountain Summer Homes - 441542 Heber DWID - 441548 Porter Mountain - 441552 Department Total Public Health Services District Health District - 250600 Medical Reserve - 250601 Bio-Terrorism - 250602 Immunization Services - 250603 Folic Acid - 250605 W.I.C. - 250606 Nutrition Network - 250607 T.B. - 250608 Sexually Transmitted Disease - 250609 Physical Activity - 250611 Tobacco Prevention - 250612 Injury Prevention - 250613 Teen Pregnancy Prevention - 250614 Family Planning - 250615 HIV Prevention & Control - 250616 Prenatal - 250617 DOJ Equipment - 250619 Smoke Free Arizona - 250624 Arizona Dental Sealant - 250625 Oral Health - 250629 Community Nut Program - 250634 Pandemic Flu - 250635 Child Fatality - 250636 NC for Planning - 250637 H1N1 Phase I & II - 250638 H1N1 Phase III - 250639 Fluoride Varnish - 250640 Safe Routes to School - 250641 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 12,340 28,553 2,485 310,013 2,724 23,874 $ 2,232,917 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 48 1,842 29,851 11,180 25,036 251,037 14,651 $ 1,925,821 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 12,536 19,818 13 9,489 48,860 56,517 24,979 37,312 182,443 2,765 17,397 $ 2,234,706 $ $ $ 1,977,236 5,129 332,620 194,891 31,863 374,874 216,137 25,172 34,348 43,349 232,399 75,000 111,099 103,540 99,068 58,732 84,425 5,200 12,143 79,502 26,173 19,018 32,070 44,264 5,000 9,500 5,000 1,694,604 276 216,330 59,719 286,045 157,273 10,988 3,226 42,169 144,931 77,456 85,576 39,384 9,413 9,843 84,047 5,278 51,147 8,272 1,491 33,984 2,096 22,461 - 1,840,055 279,901 208,702 26,978 346,209 192,479 33,475 38,686 46,152 237,816 77,839 113,005 107,870 97,751 14,372 65,188 26,099 9,200 27,330 26,274 30,132 48 16,434 53,552 - 296 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ 4,237,752 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 27,086 $ 3,073,095 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 58,773 31,344 76,377 $ 4,082,041 Indigent Health General Fund - 110101 Department Total $ $ 3,398,400 3,398,400 $ $ 2,790,796 2,790,796 $ $ 3,398,400 3,398,400 Superintendent of Schools General Fund - 110101 Department Total $ $ 338,286 338,286 $ $ 318,284 318,284 $ $ 339,829 339,829 $ 56,413 59,872 49,234 26,476 50,284 47,734 290,013 $ 38,408 52,328 37,467 25,374 37,320 45,746 236,643 $ 61,045 59,779 49,183 26,693 45,579 47,734 290,013 631,063 215,722 41,904 1,643,584 2,532,273 $ 11,279 75,000 515 499,215 586,009 $ 10,101,020 710,761 10,811,781 $ 900,942 900,942 $ DEPARTMENT/FUND Whiteriver Oral Health - 250642 Immunization Services - 250643 Child Care Health Consultant - 250644 Department Total Constables General Fund - Kayenta General Fund - Pinetop General Fund - Snowflake General Fund - Holbrook General Fund - Winslow General Fund - Show Low Department Total Capital Projects General Fund - 110101 Jail Construction - 229460 Fawnbrook - 331515 Shumway Road - 331524 Hilltop Drive CRID - 331555 Health Building - 350649 Department Total Flood Control Districts Navajo County Flood Control District - 229460 Little Colorado Flood Control Zone - 229461 Department Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000,000 397,200 5,397,200 12,483,419 826,437 13,309,856 297 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y SCHEDULE F FY 2011-12 NAVAJO COUNTY Summary by Department of Expenditures/Expenses Fiscal Year 2012 DEPARTMENT/FUND Workforce Investment Act SAS -251651 Youth - 251656 Summer Youth - 251658 Dislocated Worker - 251659 ACP (Admin) - 251663 Interest - 251664 REPAC - 251665 WIA FY 09 - 251670 WIA PY 08 - 251671 WIA FY 10 - 251672 WIA PY 09 - 251673 WIA FY 11 - 251674 WIA PY 10 - 251675 WIA FY 12 - 251676 WIA PY 11 - 251677 WIA Stimulus - 251680 Department Total ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL ADOPTED BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2011 $ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES * 2011 $ $ 101,085 7,860 4,371 19,135 56,470 27,863 2,115 195,048 166,186 505,371 1,085,504 $ 114,010,704 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES/ EXPENSES 2012 $ $ 941 565 376 1,677 113,725 128,966 6,082 23,269 2,040 277,641 $ 101,085 7,483 17,263 19,135 56,470 59,088 48,476 258,608 221,585 247,765 266,860 1,303,818 $ 70,529,771 $ 113,913,886 * Includes actual expenditures/expenses recognized on the modified accrual or accrual basis as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus estimated expenditures/expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. 298 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK GLOSSARY 300 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Accrual Basis of Accounting - A method of accounting in which revenues are recorded when measurable and earned, and expenses are recognized when a good or service is used. Adopted Budget - A plan of financial operations approved by the Board of Supervisors and established by resolution which reflects approved tax rates, estimates of revenues, expenditures, transfers, departmental objectives and performance/workload indicators for a fiscal year. Agency Funds - These funds account for assets held by an entity in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental organizations or other funds. This is a type of fiduciary fund. AHCCCS - An acronym for "Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System." Arizona counties make a contribution to the State-managed AHCCCS system based on a formula proscribed by State law. The AHCCCS program provides indigent health care. ALTCS - An acronym for "Arizona Long-Term Care System‖ which provides indigent long-term care. Counties make a contribution to ALTCS based on a formula established by State law. Annual Financial Audit - The independent review of the financial position and reporting procedures of a local government entity. Navajo County is audited by the State Auditor General. Annualize - To calculate the full-year cost of any budget changes made mid-fiscal year for the purpose of adding that cost to a prepared annual budget. Appropriation - An authorized amount approved by the Board of Supervisors for a specified unit or agency of the county government against which expenditures may be incurred and obligations made for specific purposes within a specified fiscal year. Assessed Valuation - The valuation of real estate or certain personal property for purposes of taxation, which is a statutorily determined percentage of market value. Assessment Ratio - The ratio at which the tax rate is applied to the tax base. Asset - Resources owned or held by a government which have monetary value. Attrition - A method of reducing personnel by not filling positions made vacant through resignation, reassignment, transfer, retirement, termination or means other than layoff. Balanced Budget - A budget where total expenditures do not exceed total revenues. Bond - A long-term promise to repay a specified amount (on the face of the bond) on or by a particular date; used primarily to finance capital projects. Bond Refinancing - The payoff and re-issuance of bonds in order to obtain an improved interest rate and/or bond conditions. Budget - A plan for financial activity for a specified period of time (in Navajo County, a fiscal year from July. 301 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Budget Amendment - A change to the Adopted Budget for the purposes of re-allocating appropriations during a fiscal year. Budgetary Basis - The basis of accounting used by a government agency to estimate financing sources and uses in its budget, which are generally GAAP, cash or modified cash accrual basis. Budget Calendar - The schedule of key dates which a government follows in the preparation and adoption of its budget. Budgetary Control - The management of a government in accordance with its approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and resources. Capital Assets - Assets of a determined value ($5,000 or more for Navajo County) which generally have an assigned useful life of several years; also called fixed assets. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Also known as a capital improvement plan, this is a detailed plan for the expenditure of funds towards capital projects, usually over five years. Capital Projects Budget - A spending plan for improvements to or acquisition of county-owned land, facilities, and/or infrastructure. The capital budget (1) balances revenues and expenditures, (2) specifies the sources of revenues, (3) lists each project of acquisition, and (4) must ordinarily be approved by the legislative body. Capital Outlay – An expenditure used from a department‘s operating budget for the acquisition of a capital asset. A capital asset is an item that costs $5,000 or more and has an assigned useful life of at least one year. Capital assets should be budgeted and itemized in the capital outlay object codes. Capital Project - A major construction, acquisition or renovation activity which adds value to a government‘s physical assets or significantly increases its useful life; also called a capital improvement. Capital Projects Fund - A type of governmental fund established to account for expenditures related to capital projects. Capitalized Interest - A portion of the proceeds of an issue that is set aside to pay interest in the securities for a specified period of time. Interest is commonly capitalized for the construction period of a revenue-producing project and sometimes for a period thereafter, so that debt service expense does not begin until the project is expected to be operational and producing revenues. Sometimes referred to as ―funded interest.‖ Carry Forward – Cash available at the end of the fiscal year. Cash Basis - A basis of accounting in which transactions are recognized only when cash is increased or decreased. 302 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Certificate of Participation (COP) - An instrument producing a pro rata share in a specific pledged revenue stream, usually lease payments by the issuer that are subject to annual appropriation. The certificate generally entitles the holder to receive a share, or participation, in the lease payments from a particular project. The lease payments are passed through the lessor to the certificate holders. The lessor typically assigns the lease and lease payments to a trustee, which then distributes the lease payments to the certificate holders. Chart of Accounts - A chart that assigns a unique number to each type of transaction (e.g., salaries or property taxes) and to each budgetary unit in the organization. The chart of accounts provides a system for recording revenues and expenditures that fits the organizational structure and adheres to statutory and financial reporting requirements. Commodities - Expendable items that are consumable or have a short life span, such as office supplies, gasoline, and small equipment. Compensated Absences - Compensated absences are absences for which employees will be paid, such as vacation, sick leave, or other leave. Consumer Price Index - A statistical description of price levels provided by the U.S. Department of Labor and used as a measure of the increase in the cost of living to reflect economic inflation. Contingency - A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise budgeted. Contractual Services - Services rendered to a government by private firms, individuals or other governmental agencies, e.g. rents, maintenance agreements and professional consulting services. County Sales Tax - A general excise tax levied on all applicable categories of sales expressed as a percentage of the State Sales Tax. Debt Service Fund – A fund used to account for the accumulation of resources and payments of general long-term debt principal and interest; such as that associated with general obligation and special assessment. Deficit - The excess of an entity‘s liabilities over it assets or the excess of expenditures or expenses over revenues during a single accounting period. Department – An organizational unit directed by a director or elected official. In terms of financial structure, departments can have multiple funding sources (i.e. general fund, special revenues etc) and are approved for specified uses. Depreciation - This is the amount of expense charged against earnings by an organization to write off the cost of a capital asset over its useful life, giving consideration to wear and tear, obsolescence and salvage value. If the expense is assumed to be incurred in equal amounts in each business period over the life of the asset, the depreciation method used is straight line (SL). 303 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Designated Fund Balance - Current operating funds that have been limited for a specific purpose by specific action of the Board of Supervisors for fiscal reserve purposes or by an administrative unit authorized by the Board to designate funds. Employee Related Expenditures (ERE) - The ERE included in the Adopted Budget are the County's share of an employee's fringe benefits and taxes. ERE provided by Navajo County include FICA (Social Security), Medicare, employee and dependent health insurance, dental, vision, unemployment, and life insurance, retirement and workers compensation. Encumbrance - A reservation of funds for an anticipated expenditure prior to actual payment of that specific item. Funds usually are reserved or encumbered with a purchase order prior to the actual cash payment being disbursed. Enterprise Fund - A proprietary fund established to account for governmental facilities and services that are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges; or when the governmental unit has decided periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses and/or net income is appropriate, (i.e., governmentally owned utilities.) Expenditure - A decrease in net financial resources. Expenditures include payment in cash for current operating expenses, capital outlays and debt service. Expenditure Limit - In 1980 the Arizona Constitution was amended to limit the expenditures for counties and other local governments. Adjustments are allowed for increases in inflation or deflation and population growth. Set expenditure limitations can only be adjusted by a vote of the constituents. Expense - Charges incurred for operations, maintenance, interest or other charges. Fees – Charges for direct receipt of a public service on the party receiving the service. Fiduciary Fund - Fund held by a governmental unit in a fiduciary capacity for an external party. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) – Financial Accounting Standards Board. This private, non-profit organization is responsible for determining standards of accounting principles. These principals are commonly referred to as the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Function - A group of related activities aimed at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program for which a government is responsible (e.g., public safety). Fiscal Policy - A government agency‘s adopted policy for managing revenues, spending and debt related to the government services and programs it provides and its capital investment; fiscal policy establishes agreed-upon principles and guidelines for the planning and programming of government budgets and their funding. Fiscal Year (FY) - the 12-month period to which the annual operating budget applies. The Navajo County fiscal year begins July 1 and ends June 30. The county's fiscal year is expressed in terms of the ending date, for example, "FY 2011" refers to the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2010 and ends 304 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Flood Control District - This is a special taxing district that addresses flood control problems and issues through capital projects in Navajo County. Full Accrual Accounting - A basis of accounting in which revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred. Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) – A value equivalent to the number of employees paid full time (forty hours per week, or from 2,080 to 2,096 hours per year – depending on the calendar). A half-time position that is paid 20 hours per week equates to a .5 FTE. Fund - A fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts which is segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or objectives in accordance with specific regulations, restrictions, or limitations. The county has several funds. Governmental accounting information is organized into funds, each with separate revenues, expenditures, and fund balances. Fund Balance/Equity - The difference between a fund's assets and its liabilities. Portions of the fund balance may be reserved for various purposes, such as contingencies or encumbrances, carried forward into the next fiscal year, or reverted back to a granting agency if such is contractually stipulated. Fund Transfers – Transferring monies between funds is a tool for maintaining a structurally balanced budget. GASB 34 - Refers to Statement 34 issued by the Government Accounting Standards Board which establishes new requirements for the annual financial reports of state and local governments. The statement was developed to make annual reports easier to understand and more useful to the people who use governmental financial information to make their decisions (or who may do so in the future): legislators, their staff and members of oversight bodies; investors, creditors and others who provide resources to governments; and citizen groups and the public in general. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) - These are the uniform minimum standards for financial accounting and reporting, reflecting the rules and procedures that define accepted accounting principles. General Fund – A fund accounting for all financial resources of the county that serves as the county‘s primary operating fund. General Obligation (GO) Bond – General Obligation Bonds must be approved by a majority of Navajo County residents. They are sold to raise funding for capital expenditures. Funding for repayment would be provided by the county‘s secondary debt service property tax levy. Goal - A goal is the purpose towards which an endeavor is directed. A goal supports a department's Mission Statement and a county-wide priority. Goals should include expected performance levels (i.e. citizen satisfaction levels, turnaround times, efficiencies, etc.) and are results-oriented, specific, state outcomes in measurable terms and attainable within a specifically stated time frame. 305 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) – An independent not-for-profit organization that is responsible for issuing accounting standards for state and local governments. Governmental Fund - A generic classification used by GASB to refer to all funds other than proprietary and fiduciary funds. The General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Projects Funds, and Debt Service funds are the types of funds referred to as governmental funds. Governmental funds are said to be expendable; that is, resources are received and expended, with no expectation that they will be returned through user or departmental charges. Revenues and expenditures (not expenses) of governmental funds are recognized on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Grant - A contribution made by one governmental unit or other organization to another to support a specific function. Grants may be classified as either operational or capital, depending upon the grantee. Grant Revertment - When a government entity in receipt of a grant reverts any unexpended funds from the grant award to the granting agency. Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) - This revenue is derived from the gas tax, a portion of which is returned to counties by the state. Improvement District - In accordance with Arizona Revised Statute Title 48, Chapter 6, a special district created for the purpose of, among other actions, maintaining, landscaping, grading, regarding or otherwise improving the whole or any portion of one or more streets in the proposed district. Incremental Budgeting - A budgeting process in which precedent determines how funds will be allocated among departments and programs. Under incremental budgeting, increases in allocations usually occur in small increases over past levels. Increments - The term used in the county budget process to identify increased costs due to a program or service demand change. A program increment covers: maintenance of an existing program, an expansion/improvement of an existing program, a new program, or a proposal to fund from local dollars a program which has previously been supported by non-local sources of revenue. Sometimes an increment is adding staff or other resources to a program in order to continue the present level of service. Absence of an increment in the face of a growing population's service demands could lower the quality of service. Indirect Cost – A fixed or overhead cost that cannot be attributed directly to the production of a particular item and is incurred even when there is no output. Indirect costs may include the cost center functions of finance and accounting, information technology, administration and personnel. Infrastructure - The physical assets of a government (for example streets or bridges). Intergovernmental Revenue - Revenues from other governments, such as the state and federal government, in the form of grants, entitlements, shared revenues or payments in lieu of taxes. 306 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Internal Service Funds - One or more funds that account for the goods and services provided by one department to another within government on a cost-reimbursement basis. This is a type of proprietary fund. Land Development - Capital improvements to preserve land or to enhance its public use. This includes fencing, outdoor lighting, drainage/storm runoff, and planting vegetation, as well as forest thinning. Lease Purchase - This method of financing allows the county to construct or acquire property and pay for it over a period of time by installment payments rather than an outright purchase. The time payments include an interest charge, which is typically lower than standard rates because the recipient does not have to pay income tax on the interest. Levy - To impose taxes for the support of governmentally provided services. Levy Limit - In 1980 the Arizona Constitution was amended to limit the amounts which could be levied on property by counties and other local governments. Liability - Resources owned by a government which have monetary value. Limited Appointment - A position whose appointment is made for a specific project within a specific time frame. Limited appointments must be for no more than 24 months in duration. Line Item Budget - A budget that reflects appropriation by specific expenditure categories. Long-Term Debt - This is all debt, including bonds, debentures, bank debt, mortgages, and capital lease obligations with a repayment period greater than one year. Lottery Revenue - The state allocates a portion of the lottery proceeds to counties based on a formula. Major Fund - A fund consisting of 10% or more of the associated total revenues, expenditures/ expenses, assets or liabilities of all governmental or all enterprise funds, and 5% or more of revenues, expenditures/expenses, assets or liabilities of all governmental funds and enterprise funds. Marginal Cost - The additional cost of providing service to one more resident or consumer. Once capacity is reached, additional service capacity must be funded, and marginal cost increases substantially. Mission Statement - A clear, concise statement of purpose for the entire county or department. The mission‘s focal point is broad, yet distinctly describes the county or department goals. Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting - A type of accounting in which revenue is recognized when it is measurable and available to finance the expenditures of the current period and expenditures are generally recorded when the related fund liability is incurred (with some exceptions). 307 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 NCSO – Navajo County Sheriff‘s Office Net Present Value (NPV) - A method used to calculate the economic value of capital projects. NPV uses a discount rate to take account of the discrepancy between the present costs of undertaking a project and its future stream of benefits. The greater the NPV of a project, the more economically attractive it will be. Object Code – Identifies the expenditure type (e.g., cash, accounts payable, salaries and wages etc.) Obligations - Amounts which a government may be legally required to meet out of its resources, including both actual liabilities and encumbrances not yet paid. Operating Budget - That portion of a budget which deals with recurring expenditures such as salaries, electric bills, postage, printing and duplicating, paper supplies, and gasoline. Taken together, the operating and the capital budgets should equal the total amount of spending for the fiscal period. Operating Expenses - The cost for personnel, materials and equipment required for a department to function. Operating Revenue - Funds that the government receives as income to pay for ongoing day-to-day operations; includes taxes, fees from specific services, interest earnings and grant revenues. Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) - This revenue is received from the federal government by counties with public lands. Some counties have a large percentage of their area in public lands, and find themselves responsible for providing services to thousands of visitors each year. This revenue partially offsets those expenses incurred from public land use, and compensates for revenue lost due to the presence of public, non-taxable federal property in a county. Performance Indicators - Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed as an objective of specific departments or programs. Performance Measure - As defined by GFOA, a specific quantitative measure or qualitative assessment of results obtained through a program or activity. It summarizes the relationship between inputs and outputs in achieving outcomes with respect to effectiveness, cost (efficiency) and quality. Performance Measurement - As defined by GFOA, a process for determining how a program is accomplishing its mission, goals, and objectives through the delivery of products, services, or processes. Personnel Services – A category of expenditures within the budget that includes salaries, benefits, temporaries, and overtime etc. Personnel Savings – A savings in general, when budgeted positions are held vacant or employees are paid at a lower rate than was budgeted. 308 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Personal Property - For property tax purposes in Arizona, personal property is designated as all types of property except land, buildings or other real property improvements. Taxable personal property includes movable items used for agricultural, commercial, industrial or rental-residential purposes. Personal property is not attached permanently to real property and may be removed by its owner without damage to the real property. Mobile homes are also personal property unless the owners file an affidavit affixing the mobile home to their real property. Pledged Revenues - These are moneys obligated for the payment of debt service and the making of other deposits required by the bond contract. Gross pledge or gross revenue pledge - A pledge that all revenues received will be used for debt service prior to deductions for any costs or expenses. Net pledge or net revenue pledge - A pledge that net revenues will be used for payment of debt service. Position – A single specific instance of a job class, whether occupied or vacant, involving duties entailing the services of one person. A position may be full or part-time as reflected in the FTE value. Primary Property Taxes and Values - Primary or "limited" values are used to calculate primary property taxes which are collected to fund the maintenance and operation of school districts, community college districts, counties, cities and State government. Primary values and taxes are both "limited" as to how much they can increase if no changes have been made to the property. Program – A set of activities that have a common purpose that produces results for customers. Programs are described in the department description and are aligned with the department‘s mission and goals. Program Budget - A budget which allocates money to the functions or activities of a government rather than to specific items of cost to specific departments. Property Tax System - Arizona's property tax system is unique in that it uses two types of property values for taxing purposes; primary and secondary (see definitions of each). Property taxes are applied to each $100 of assessed valuation on real and personal property. Proposed Budget - A plan of financial operations submitted by the County Manager to the Board of Supervisors. This plan reflects estimated revenues, expenditures, transfers, and departmental goals, objectives, and performance/workload indicators. Proprietary Funds - Sometimes referred to as ―income determination,‖ ―non-expendable,‖ or ―commercial-type‖ funds. They are used to account for a government‘s ongoing organizations and activities that are similar to those often found in the private sector (enterprise and internal service funds). Revenues and expenses (not expenditures) are accounted for on the full accrual basis. Public Hearing - An open meeting regarding proposed operating or capital budget allocations which provides citizens with an opportunity to voice their views on the merits of the proposals. 309 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Real Property - Real estate, including land and improvements (buildings, fencing, paving) classified for purposes of assessment. Regressive Tax - A tax that is relatively more burdensome on lower-income households. Reserves - Fund balances that cannot be used for recurring expenditures but are available for emergency or onetime expenditures. Resolution - A special or temporary order of a legislative body; an order of a legislative body requiring less legal formality than an ordinance or statute. Resources - The total amount available for appropriation including estimated revenues, fund transfers and beginning fund balances. Revenue - An increase in assets or financial resources. Revenue Bond - A bond that is payable from a specific source of revenue and to which the full faith and credit of an issuer with taxing power is not pledged. Revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue and do not permit the bondholders to compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds not pledged for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of the financed project, grants and excise or other specified non-ad-valorem taxes. Revenue Neutral Position - A position is considered to be revenue neutral when its expenditure impact, i.e., its total cost, is directly offset by the generation of incremental (or "new") revenue. Secondary Property Taxes and Values - Secondary or "full cash" values are synonymous to market values. They are used to calculate secondary property taxes to support voter-approved budget overrides, bond issues and other debt service, such as special districts. Service Area - These are made up of departments with similar goals and priorities with a common purpose and common issues to address. Services – A service is the productive outcome that the customer receives from a department. Service Level - Services or products which comprise actual or expected output of a given program. Focus is on results, not measures or workload. Source of Revenue - Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin. Special Assessment - A tax or levy customarily imposed against only those specific parcels of real estate that will benefit from a proposed public improvement like a street or sewer. Special Revenue Fund – A fund that accounts for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than major capital projects)_ that is legally restricted to specific-purpose expenditures. State Shared Sales Tax - Sales tax collected by the state and distributed to cities and counties based on a formula set by state statute. Strategic Goal – A strategic goal translates resources into significant results to be achieved over the next two-five years providing the basis for evaluating the department as a whole. 310 N AVAJ O C O U N T Y GLOSSARY FY 2011-12 Strategic Plan – A strategic plan sets forth the purpose, strategic goals, operational organization, and performance expectations for a department. The strategic plan provides information to department staff, corporate decision makers, the Navajo County Board of Supervisors, and the public about how the department is organized to deliver results to its customers. It outlines the results that the department is accountable for achieving. The plan provides the opportunity for all department staff to observe how they contribute at all levels in the organization. Tax Levy - The resultant product when the tax rate per one hundred dollars of assessed value is multiplied by the tax base. Taxes - Compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefits of the people. This term does not encompass special assessments. Tentative Budget - A preliminary adoption of the budget that sets the expenditure ―ceiling‖ that legally cannot be exceeded during a given fiscal year. Title III - These are a portion of National Forest Fee revenue allocated by the board. Trend – A documented recurrence of a measurable events or circumstances over time that is increasing, decreasing or even staying the same. The size of the number of occurrences often determines whether the recurrences constitute a trend. Unencumbered Fund Balance - Amount of an appropriation neither expended nor encumbered; generally available for future purposes. Variable Cost - A cost that increases or decreases relative to increases/decreases in the amount of service provided. Vehicle License Tax - Also known as Auto-Lieu, a tax paid to the State by drivers when registering vehicles as part of the total registration cost, a portion of which is returned to the counties by the State.