1 2 Arizona State Statutes §41-861 through §41-864 direct state agencies to: preserve historic properties under their ownership or control; consider the use of historic properties for agency responsibilities; establish a program to locate, inventory, and nominate properties to the Arizona Register of Historic Places; insure that properties are not destroyed or substantially altered by state action or assistance; make appropriate documentation in accordance with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) standards if a property is destroyed or altered; and seek review and comment from the SHPO on agency plans. This report provides a summary of the performance of state agencies in compliance with these state statutes. The information provided was compiled from SHPO records and an agency self-evaluation questionnaire. Table 1 lists agencies that responded to the SHPO-designed survey questionnaire (see Appendix). Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) Arizona Department of Emergency & Military Affairs (ADEMA) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Arizona Department of Health Services/State Hospital (ADHS) Arizona Department of Housing (ADH) Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services (ADVS) Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM) Arizona Exposition and State Fair (AESF) Arizona Game a & Fish Department (AG&F) Arizona Geological Survey (AGS) Arizona Historical Society (AHS) Arizona Office of Tourism (AOT) Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) Arizona Mine Inspector (AMI) Arizona State Parks (ASP) Arizona State School for the Deaf & Blind (ASDB) Arizona State University (ASU) Arizona Water Resources Infrastructure and Finance Authority (AWIFA) School Facilities Board (SFB) University of Arizona (UA) 3 ADOA ADC N* --- ----- Y** Part Time Y Y Part Time Part Time Y Y Part Time Full Time Y --N 1-50 --- Y 1-50 N N 1-50 1-50 N Y 1-50 100-500 Part Time --- --- Y N ----- ----- ----- Y Part Time N 1-50 --Y --Part Time Y Y Y Y 50-100 1-50 ASLD Y Y Part Time Part Time 2 N Y 1-50 100-500 AMI ASP Y Part Time 2 N --- Y Part Time 1 Y 1-50 ADEMA ADEQ ADHS ADH ADOT ADVS ADEM AESF AG&F AGS AHS AOT Y1 5 4 Y Part Time N 1-50 AWIFA Y N Part Time --- Y --- 1-50 1-50 SFB UA Y Part Time N 1-50 Y Part Time Y 1-50 ASDB ASU Y2 * No ** Yes Y1 Permit writers and remediation project managers as required Y2 Volunteer/service advisory committee to University Agencies were asked if they have incorporated historic preservation into their agency planning. A total of 92.0% of the agencies responded that they had incorporated historic preservation in their agency planning, while 50.0% of the agencies responded that they had historic preservation in their state plan. A total of 77.3% responded that historic preservation was incorporated in agency policies, procedures, or regulations, and 70.0% had incorporated historic preservation in applications or agreements. Agencies were asked if they had designated an employee to coordinate the agency’s historic preservation responsibilities. Responses indicated that 86.4% of agencies had designated such an employee. Among agencies who had designated a historic preservation coordinator, 11.8% indicated that the employee was full time. In addition, 44.4% of responding agencies had additional staff devoted to historic preservation activities. However, only 47.1% of agencies indicated that their staff meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Standards for history, architecture, or archaeology. Asked how many historic preservation projects or activities they had during the 2010-11 fiscal year, 82.4% responded that they had between 1 and 50 projects/activities, 5.9% had between 51-100, and 11.8% had more than one hundred. Agency Considers the Use of Historic Buildings Y N Acquired, Leased or Constructed Buildings for Agency Use in 2010-11 N N Y Y Y N N Y N N Y N Arizona Division of Emergency Mgmt --- Y --- Arizona Exposition and State Fair Arizona Game a & Fish Department Y --Y Y N Y N Y N Y N N Y N N Y N Arizona Department of Administration Arizona Department of Corrections Arizona Department of Emergency & Military Affairs Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Health Services/State Hospital Arizona Department of Housing Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services Arizona Geological Survey Arizona Historical Society Arizona Office of Tourism Arizona State Land Department Arizona Mine Inspector Arizona State Parks Arizona State School for the Deaf & Blind Historic Property Acquired or Leased in 2010-11 Y1 5 Arizona State University Arizona Water Resources Infrastructure and Finance Authority School Facilities Board University of Arizona Y Y N N Y N Y Y Y2 Y3 1 Y Foster Ranch (Northern Arizona Shooting Range) Y2 Downtown Phoenix YMCA (lease space) Y3 Roy Place Building, 44 N. Stone, Tucson (lease); Sykes House (purchase) Table 3 summarizes agency use of historic buildings. Asked if they had acquired, leased or constructed buildings to carry out their responsibilities, 35.0% of responding agencies indicated that they had. Also, asked if they had considered the use of historic properties available to them prior to acquiring, constructing, or leasing buildings for purposes of carrying out their responsibilities, 68.4% responded that they did. Arizona Dept. of Administration Arizona Dept. of Corrections Arizona Dept. of Emergency & Military Affairs Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality Arizona Dept. of Health Services/State Hospital Arizona Dept. of Housing Arizona Dept. of Transportation Y N N None N Y N Y N N None None Y N N None Y Y --- None N Y N Y N Y None None 6 Arizona Dept. of Veterans’ Services Arizona Division of Emergency Management Arizona Exposition & State Fair Arizona Game a & Fish Dept. Arizona Geological Survey Arizona Historical Society Arizona Office of Tourism Arizona State Land Department Arizona Mine Inspector Arizona State Parks Arizona State School for the Deaf & Blind Arizona State University Arizona Water Resources Infrastructure and Finance Authority School Facilities Board University of Arizona N N N None --- --- --- None N Y --Y None None N N N None Y N Y N N N None None Y Y Y N N None None N N N None Y N N None Y N Y N Y N None None Y Y N N N Y None None Pursuant to A.R.S 41-862, agencies were asked to provide information on their program to locate, inventory, and nominate to the Arizona Register of Historic Places all properties under the agency's ownership or control that appear to meet the criteria for inclusion on the register. Responses indicated that 60.0% of agencies had such programs, with 35.0% having conducted survey or inventory to identify Arizona Register-eligible properties. A total of 25.0% of agencies had determined at least one property eligible for the register. Only 5% of agencies actually nominated a property to the Arizona Register. A total of 30.0% of agencies provided information on measures that they initiated, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer, to make appropriate documentary recordation of any historic properties that were or will be demolished or substantially altered due to agency action and provided information on the submittal 7 of these documents to the required archival repository. Of these, 33.3% included archaeological recordation, 16.7% included ethnohistorical data, 50.0 historical, and 50% architectural. A total of 16.7% included documentation meeting the standards of the Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Record (HABS/HAER) standards. None of the properties substantially altered or destroyed were actually listed in the Arizona Register. ADOA ADC ADEMA ADEQ ADHS ADH ADOT ADVS ADEM AESF AG&F AGS AHS AOT ASLD AMI ASP ASDB ASU AWIFA SFB UA N N N N Y N Y N Archaeological/Ethnohistoric/Hist orical/Architectural N SHPO Historical N SHPO Archaeological N SHPO Architectural N Architectural N ----Y N N N Y N N N Y N N Y SHPO 8 Agencies were surveyed on whether they solicited review and comment from the SHPO on agency plans involving properties either listed on or eligible for the Arizona Register of Historic Places, including any construction project, sale, lease or acquisition of a historic property. A total of 57.9% of agencies indicated that they had solicited review and comment by the SHPO on agency plans. Of these, 26.3% reported that their plans would have negative impacts on register-eligible properties, while 26.3% indicated that their plans would have positive impacts. Agencies provided the following information on the results of project review including any eligible properties negatively impacted or enhanced by agency plans/activities. Arizona Dept. of Administration Arizona Dept. of Corrections Arizona Dept. of Emergency & Military Affairs Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality Arizona Dept. of Health Services/State Hospital Arizona Dept. of Housing Arizona Dept. of Transportation Arizona Dept. of Veterans’ Services Arizona Division of Emergency Management Arizona Exposition and State Fair Arizona Game a & Fish Dept. Arizona Geological Survey Arizona Historical Society Arizona Office of Tourism Arizona State Land Dept. Arizona Mine Inspector Y N Y N N Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y --- N --- --- --Y Y --N N N N Y N Y Y Y Arizona State Parks Arizona State School for the Deaf & Blind N Arizona State University Arizona Water Resources Infrastructure and Finance N Y --Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y N 9 Authority School Facilities Board University of Arizona Y Y Y Y N Y Agencies reporting an enhancement of a historic property include work at the Verdugo Stage Station and School House on land administered by the Arizona State Land Department, replacement of roofs at the Quartermaster Depot at Yuma and at Fort Verde by Arizona State Parks, and the restoration of the Cannon-Douglass House by the University of Arizona. The following negative impacts resulting from actions by state agencies were reported: Planned alterations to the Montgomery Lounge in the Memorial Union at Arizona State University were mitigated through historic documentation of the property. Sites on State Trust Land that would be affected by road construction or development were mitigated through data recovery or testing. During construction at Game & Fish’s Eagar Pond project, human remains were found and appropriately treated. Arizona Department of Administration ADOA’s plans to remodel the former Mining and Mineral Museum into the Arizona Experience in celebration of the Arizona Centennial were submitted to SHPO for review and comment. This historic structure was built in 1921 as the El Zaribah Shrine Auditorium. Arizona State University ASU reported consultation on the following projects: • Alpha Drive Archaeology Cowden Family Resources Building - Finding of Effect (Solar panel rooftop installation) • Downtown Phoenix Post Office - Student Engagement rehabilitation Interdisciplinary Building B - Finding of Effect (New roofing & solar panel installation) • Memorial Union - Finding of Effect (Restroom) • Memorial Union - Finding of Effect (Exterior signage) • Memorial Union - Finding of Effect (Montgomery Lounge) • Pipeline Removal, Polytechnic Campus, Archaeology Physical Education West - Finding of Effect (Solar panel rooftop installation) • Stormwater Drainage – Archaeology • Tower Center - Finding of Effect (Exterior Painting) • West Hall - Finding of Effect (Door removal in Room 231) Arizona State Parks Consultation on roof replacement for the Quartermaster Depot State Historic Park. University of Arizona The University consulted on the Pima County Wireless Integrated Network project at Tumamoc Hill. School Facilities Board The Board consulted regarding ARRA Solar Energy Projects. 10 State agencies were asked additional questions regarding their historic preservation activities, planning, and funding. A total of 42.1% of agencies said that they had projects that involved consultation with Indian tribes in compliance with Executive Order 2006-14. 68.4% of agencies said that they utilized the State Historic Preservation Plan produced by the SHPO. 15.8% of agencies participated in the Arizona Site Steward Program. 10.5% of agencies said that they had applied for historic preservation grant funding in the last year to assist with acquisition, identification, evaluation, nomination, rehabilitation, or education activities. Of these, all received the funding they requested. Arizona Department of Administration Arizona Department of Corrections Arizona Department of Emergency & Military Affairs Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Health Services/State Hospital Arizona Department of Housing Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services Arizona Division of Emergency Management Arizona Exposition and State Fair Arizona Game a & Fish Department Arizona Geological Survey Arizona Historical Society Arizona Office of Tourism Arizona State Land Department Arizona Mine Inspector Arizona State Parks Arizona State School for the Deaf & Blind Arizona State University Arizona Water Resources Infrastructure and Finance Authority School Facilities Board University of Arizona Y N Y N Y Y Y N ----N --Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y The following training opportunities were offered in FY 2011: Training at the Historic Preservation Partnership Conference • Arizona Historic Preservation Act, AZSITE & Arizona Antiquities Act • Introduction to Prehistoric Artifact Analysis • The Basics of Historical Period Artifact Identification • Sharing Interactive Maps with Google Maps and Google Earth 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • National Historic Landmarks Update Greening Your Historic Home Preserving Small Business as an Economic Development Strategy Teaming Up for Preservation Bonding for Preservation Renewable Energy Meets Cultural Resource Management Arizona Burial Law, Past, Present & Future Urban Preservation Perspectives Rural Preservation Perspectives Tribal Preservation Perspectives How Can We Use Social Media to Help Preserve Historic Buildings A Sustainable Future for Cultural Heritage Undertaking Historical Research National Preservation Institute and SHPO • Conservation Strategies for Archaeologists • Archaeological Curation & Collections Management • Native American Property Law • • • Arizona Historic Preservation Act, AZSITE, & Arizona Antiquities Act Urban Preservation Perspectives Tribal Preservation Perspectives • • • • • Historic preservation legislation How to nominate a property to the Arizona/National Register Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Tribal issues and consultation Identification and evaluation of properties 12 APPENDIX State agency survey questionnaire conducted through SurveyMonkey 1. Has your agency incorporated historic preservation into your agency planning? 1.a. If yes, is historic preservation incorporated in agency plan? Agency policies, procedures, or regulations? Stipulations in applications or agreements? Other? 2. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-861 has your agency designated an employee to coordinate the agency’s historic preservation responsibilities? 2.a. If yes, how much of this designee’s work time is devoted to historic preservation activities? 2.b. Do you have additional staff devoted to historic preservation activities? 2.c. Does this designee or any other staff, who are designated to work on historic preservation activities, meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Standards for history, architecture, or archaeology? 3. Approximately how many historic preservation projects/activities did your agency have this year? 4. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-861, has your agency considered the use of historic properties available to the agency prior to acquiring, constructing, or leasing buildings for purposes of carrying out agency responsibilities? 5. Did your agency acquire, lease or construct buildings to carry out agency responsibilities in the last year? 5.a. If yes, list any historic properties acquired or leased in the last year. 6. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-862, does your agency have a program to located, inventory and nominate to the Arizona Register of Historic Places all properties under the agency’s ownership or control that appear to meet the criteria for inclusion on the resister? 6.a. Did your agency survey or inventory to identify, Arizona Register listed or eligible properties in this last year? 6.b. Did your agency, in consultation with the SHPO, determine any properties eligible for the Arizona Register or National Register in this last year? 6.c. Did your agency nominate any properties to the Arizona or National Registers in the last year? 6.d. If yes, list properties nominated. 7. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-863, did your agency take measures, in consultation with the SHPO, to make appropriate documentary recordation of any historic properties that were or will be demolished or substantially altered due to agency action? 7.a. If yes, what type of documentation? Archaeological (data recovery)? Ethnohistoric? Historical? State-level architectural? Historic American Building Survey? Historic American Engineering Record? 7.b. Was the property tat was substantially altered or destroyed listed on the Arizona or National Register of Historic Places? 7.c. If yes, please list the name of the property. 7.d. Has the documentation been submitted to the required archival repository? State Historic Preservation Office? Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records? 8. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-864, has your agency solicited review and comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer on any agency plans, which involve properties that are included on or may qualify for inclusion on the Arizona Register of Historic Places, including any construction projects, sales, leases or acquisitions of historic properties? 8.a. Were any properties eligible for or listed on the Arizona or National Register of Historic Places negatively impacted by agency plans/actions? 8.b. Were any properties eligible for or listed on the Arizona or National Register enhanced by agency plans/actions? 9. Did any of your projects involve consultation with Indian Tribes in compliance with Executive Order 2006-14? 10. Does your agency utilize the State Historic Preservation Plan produced by the SHPO? 13 11. The Arizona Site Steward Program is a volunteer program to help agencies protect and preserve Arizona and National Register properties through site/property monitoring and education. Does your agency participate in the Arizona Site Steward Program? 12. Has your agency applied for historic preservation grant funding in the last year to assist with acquisition, identification, evaluation, nomination, rehabilitation, or education activities? 12.a. If yes, did you receive funding? 12.b. If yes, which of the following funding sources did you receive funding from: Arizona Heritage Fund? Save America’s Treasures? Historic Preservation Fund? Other? 12.c. If yes, funding was awarded for: Survey/inventory? Assessment? Rehabilitation? Nomination? Acquisition? Education? Other? 12.d. If yes, amount of funding? 13. List any other proactive agency activities to protect, preserve or enhance Arizona Register listed or eligible properties. 14. If anyone from your agency has attended any of the following training offered by the SHPO and cooperating organizations/agencies in the last year, please indicate which training. 15. If you attended trainings at the Historic Preservation Partnership Conference, which trainings did you attend (check list). 16. If you attended National Preservation Institute trainings, which one of the trainings did you attend (check list). 17. Please check any additional training needs (check list). 18. Please provide any additional information on your agency’s historic preservation program and activities not covered by the above questions, including special achievements and awards. This document was compiled by Arizona State Parks, State Historic Preservation Office. For more information call 602-542-4174. 14