Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities Task Assignment TPD 03-06 Prepared by: January 30, 2007 091374015 Copyright © 2007, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT –PHASE III ACTIVITIES 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM (TASK 2).............................................................................................. 1 3. WEBSITE ENHANCEMENTS (TASK 3)............................................................................................ 5 4. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT (TASK 4)........................................................................... 5 5. STATEWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN STEERING COMMITTEE (TASK 5)................................. 6 6. STATEWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN POLICY (TASK 6) .......................................................... 6 7. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAP (TASK 7) ............................................................. 7 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................................ 8 A.1 Funding Proposal to Governor’s Office of Highway Safety for Law Enforcement Training ........................................................................................................................................... 1 A.2 Funding Proposal Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Application for Public Education Campaign......................................................................................................................................... 2 A.3 Funding Proposal to Governor’s Office of Highway Safety for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Training Course ................................................................................................................. 3 A.4 Proposed ADOT Bicycle Policy Revisions ............................................................................ 4 Proposed modifications to ADOT Bicycle Policy are shown in bold. ................................................. 4 A.5 Bicycle and Pedestrian related projects in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program........................................................................................................................................... 8 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 i Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities 1. INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of activities completed in support of Phase III of the Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. The purpose of Phase III was to implement recommendations from the Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Phase I and Phase II. Specifically, Phase III included the following tasks: § § § § § § § Task 1 –Project Management Task 2 –Educational Program Task 3 –Website Enhancements Task 4 –Highway Safety Program Grant Task 5 –Bicycle and Pedestrian Steering Committee Task 6 – Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Policy Task 7 – Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Map Activities completed on Tasks 2 through 7 are described below. 2. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM (TASK 2) Kimley-Horn continued development and implementation of the bicycle and pedestrian education program that was initially proposed in Phase II of the Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Education plan components included: § § Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Training Course Education Documents and Bicycle User Map Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Training Course In support of implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian training program, Kimley-Horn identified several existing educational training course programs that are focused on bicycle and pedestrian facility design. The identified curriculums are targeted at engineers, planners, and bicycle/pedestrian coordinators. Each curriculum is focused on bicycle and pedestrian facility design. The identified courses are listed in Table 1 on the next page. Kimley-Horn prepared a grant application (refer to Section 4) that was submitted to the Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety to provide funding to conduct a set of one of the bicycle and pedestrian facility design training course workshops listed in Table 1. The funding application was selected for partial funding by the GOHS. The specific training course that will be conducted will be selected in consultation with the GOHS and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The training course will be implemented as part of ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Phase IV activities. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 1 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities Table 1 – Available Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Education Training Courses Course Title Length Cost Description Contact Information Northwestern University Bicycle Planning and Facilities Workshop 3 days Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Walkable Communities 1 or 2 day courses National Highway Institute, Pedestrian Facility Design Course 1 ½ days $650.00 per participant 3-day Bicycle and Facilities Workshop is directed to traffic and transportation engineers, technicians, and planners to help them better understand the comprehensive nature of bicycle facility planning and design. 1-800-323-4011 Course presentation illustrates dozens of successful towns and cities of all sizes as they changed their town planning, roadway design and funding decisions from reactive to proactive. $2,000 per day 1-866-347-2734 DBurden@aol.com kowens@glatting.com $310 per participant NHI Training Team: nhitraining@fhwa.dot.gov (703) 235-0534 NHI Training Program Manager: Mila Plosky (703) 235-0527 mila.plosky@fhwa.dot.gov Technical Information: John Fegan (202) 366-5007 john.fegan@fhwa.dot.gov National Highway Institute, Bicycle Facility Design Course 1 ½ days $260 per participant NHI Training Team: nhitraining@fhwa.dot.gov (703) 235-0534 NHI Training Program Manager: Mila Plosky (703) 235-0527 mila.plosky@fhwa.dot.gov Technical Information: John Fegan (202) 366-5007 john.fegan@fhwa.dot.gov Designing streets for Safe Bicycle Accommodation 1 day 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Fee varies info@bicyclesolutions.com John Ciccarelli (650) 494-9140 650-714-1274 2 Target audience are engineers with planning, design, construction, or maintenance responsibilities; pedestrian and bicycle specialists; planners; disability and orientation specialists, transportation planners, architects, landscape architects, as well as decision makers at the project planning level. http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/ coursedesc.asp?coursenum=1066 Target audience are Federal, State, or local engineers with planning, design, construction, or maintenance responsibilities; bicycle specialists; transportation planners; landscape architects, as well as decision makers at the project planning level. http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/ coursedesc.asp?coursenum=1066 Workshop gives transportation planners and traffic engineers the framework they need to design bicycle travel space on any type of street. The seminar covers options for new construction, resurfacing, and widenings, and discusses state-of-the-art bicycle options such as Bicycle Boulevards. Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities Table 1 – Available Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Education Training Courses (continued) Course Title Length Cost Description Contact Information Designing Streets for Pedestrians 2- and 3-day combined bike and pedestrian courses; 1 or 2-day bike or pedestrian courses also available. $1,500 per day, plus direct expenses, $750.00 for an additional local focus. michaelronkin@comcast.net www.michaelronkin.com Focus is on street designs that better accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Courses provide enough detail so engineers and planners can substantially improve their understanding and skills. The courses can be customized to fit local needs. Course content includes: Designing Streets for Bicyclists 1 day $1,500 per day, plus direct expenses, $750.00 for an additional local focus. michaelronkin@comcast.net - Introduction - Basics of sidewalk design - Other sidewalk design issues: - ADA- “Universal Design”: - Street crossings (mostly midblock) - Intersection design part 1 and part 2 www.michaelronkin.com Course content includes: - The principles of bicycling: - On-road bikeways: - Surface design details: - Restriping roads with bike lanes - Intersection design: - Signing and marking - Shared use paths: - Bicycle parking - Advanced bikeway designs Education Documents and Bicycle User Map A second element of Task 2 was to update and order additional copes of the Arizona Bicycle Street Smarts and the Statewide Bicycle User Map. Minor changes to the Statewide Bicycle User Map were made, and 5,000 copies were ordered. Minor changes included: Update shoulder widths for the following: - Miracle Mile between I-10 and Oracle Road. Should width should be greater than 4 ft. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 3 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities - SR 77 from River to Ina Road to greater than 4 ft. SR 89A between milepost 356 and milepost 369 to greater than 4 ft. SR 260 between Heber and Payson to 0 to 2 ft. US 95 between milepost 32 and milepost 38 to 0 to 2 ft. US 95 between milepost 41 and milepost 71 to 3 to 4 ft. Update grade symbols on I-8 to “extreme grade’ southwest of Welton. Update symbols for rest areas to show on both sides of the highway for the following: - I-8 between Yuma and Gila Bend (3 locations) I-10 west of Phoenix (3 locations) I-10 between Benson and Wilcox I-19 south of Green Valley I-40 west of Kingman I-40 west of Winslow Move symbol for Homolovi Ruins to west of SR 87, north of I-40. Remove B-19 symbol between Tucson and Sahuarita Update summary of Arizona Bicycle Laws to include ARS 28735 (3-ft clearance law). Update Annual Bicycle Events to include: - Desert Classic, move from March to April McDowell Mountain Classic, add under November 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 4 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities 3. WEBSITE ENHANCEMENTS (TASK 3) Kimley-Horn and Associates provided enhancements to the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Program website (azbikeped.org) reflect current ADOT website standards. Enhancements included: Website was updated to reflect ADOT standards. The azbikeped.org left-side navigation was removed and replaced with left side navigation from the Transportation Planning Division at ADOT. In addition, the ADOT header was added to each webpage as illustrated. Inclusion of maintenance resource contact list for local city and county agencies throughout Arizona. When a maintenance need is identified, an individual can use the website to obtain the contact information for reporting the maintenance need. All links on the website were verified and missing/dead links were updated or removed. Kimley-Horn created a map utilizing existing ADOT GIS data that shows regional bicycle improvements that will be completed along with ADOT projects within the Transportation Improvement Plan that will improve conditions for cyclists and pedestrians, such as shoulder widths to be widened. The map was added to the website. 4. HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT (TASK 4) Kimley-Horn developed three funding applications that were submitted to the Arizona Governor’s Office of Highway Safety. Copies of the submitted proposals are included in the Appendices. The proposals submitted are: Bicycle and Pedestrian Engineering Design: Proposal is to conduct a series of bicycle and pedestrian facility design workshops throughout the state for local, county, tribal land and state engineers and planners so that they are better able to design safe facilities. The proper design of such facilities will improve the safety of the bicyclist and the pedestrian. Bicycle and Pedestrian Public Safety Education: Proposal is to develop a public education campaign to increase the safety awareness of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists on Arizona roadways. The awareness campaign will be targeted toward the general public throughout all of Arizona including in metropolitan areas, rural areas, and on tribal lands. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Motorist Enforcement: Proposal is to develop training materials and curriculum to increase awareness among police officers of bicycle and pedestrian safety laws, regulations, and practices so that they are better able to enforce them. The training materials will be prepared in coordination with the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (AZ POST). Alternatives include incorporating materials into the existing AZ POST training curriculum or providing the materials as continuing education curriculum. The 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 5 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities benefits of the project will be to increase officers’ knowledge of pedestrian and bicycle safe practices, laws, and enforcement opportunities. 5. STATEWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN STEERING COMMITTEE (TASK 5) The Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan identifies the need to continue regular stakeholder interaction to discuss statewide bicycle and pedestrian issues. Several options for maintaining regular interactions among stakeholders are available. Among the alternatives are: Establish an informal committee, similar to the Project Steering Committee established during the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Phase I, II and III; Establish a formal Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Steering Committee. This committee would be similar to the now defunct Governor’s Bicycle Task Force. Each of these alternatives was discussed at the Phase III stakeholder committee meetings. The consensus of the stakeholder committee was that a formalized Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Steering Committee should be established. The Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Steering Committee should: Be a formalized committee established by action of the Governor; Have a defined set of goals and objectives; Have a requirement for an annual report; Have regularly scheduled bi-monthly or quarterly meetings; Address both bicycle and pedestrian topics within the same committee; Be sponsored by either ADOT or the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety; and, Be multi-disciplined and include representatives from agencies such as Motor Vehicle Division (MVD), the Arizona Office of Tourism and the business community. Michael Sanders, the ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator is leading the task of determining how best to formalize the committee. 6. STATEWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN POLICY (TASK 6) The ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian coordinator hosted a meeting to review the existing ADOT bicycle and pedestrian policies. ADOT staff will continue to instigate the appropriate procedures within ADOT for a formal review of the existing Bicycle Policy and for the establishment of a Pedestrian Policy. ADOT Bicycle Policy: Proposed revisions to the existing bicycle policy are included in the Appendix. ADOT Pedestrian Policy: Current ADOT pedestrian policy is to only provide right-of-way for sidewalks in which the local jurisdictions can construct the sidewalks with local funding. The ADOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Steering Committee has expressed a desire that a pedestrian policy facility inclusion of sidewalks in roadway design projects. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 6 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities 7. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAP (TASK 7) Kimley-Horn reviewed the ADOT Five-Year Transportation Improvement Program to identify upcoming projects that will improve the accommodation of bicycles and pedestrians on state highways. In addition to bicycle/pedestrian-specific projects, roadway improvement projects that will improve bicycle accommodation, such as shoulder widening, were identified. The identified projects were included in a map and accompanying table. The map is based on the Five-Year Transportation Improvement Program GIS map that is updated annually by staff in the ADOT Transportation Planning Division. The map and accompanying project listing table were incorporated into the ADOT website and are available in the Appendix. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 7 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities APPENDIX 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 8 Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities A.1 Funding Proposal to Governor’s Office of Highway Safety for Law Enforcement Training 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities A. PROPOSAL SUMMARY SHEET FOR GOHS USE ONLY PROPOSAL NUMBER 2007 - ____________ AGENCY: Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division AGENCY CEO: Victor Mendez MAILING ADDRESS: 206 S. 17th Avenue, Mail Drop 100A CITY: Phoenix COUNTY: Maricopa AGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER: (602) 712-7227 ZIP: 85007 FAX: (602) 712-6941 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT DIRECTOR: Dale Buskirk E-MAIL: DBuskirk@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8143 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Sanders E-MAIL: MSanders@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8141 SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL: This proposal is to develop materials to use in providing additional training, education, and awareness among police officers about bicycle and pedestrian safety. These materials will be prepared in coordination with the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (AZ POST). ADOT will coordinate with AZ POST as to the appropriate method of delivery. Alternatives include incorporating materials into the existing AZ POST training curriculum or providing the materials as continuing education curriculum. The benefits of this project will be to increase officers’ knowledge of pedestrian and bicycle safe practices, laws, and enforcement opportunities. TOTAL AMOUNT OF REQUEST: GOHS USE ONLY: $ 29,500 B. AGENCY COVER LETTER (A transmittal letter from Mr. Victor Mendez, Director, ADOT, is transmitted separately.) C. PROJECT PROPOSAL OUTLINE NARRATIVE 1. BACKGROUND / PROBLEM a) General Characteristics: The applicant agency, the Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division, supports and manages the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. The purpose of the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian program is to plan, develop, and support implementation of facilities and programs that serve the mobility needs and improve the Arizona Facts accessibility and safety of bicyclists and Climate – The topography of the State of Arizona ranges pedestrians on Arizona roadways. from low-lying deserts in the south to high-elevation mountain peaks in the north. The weather and climate are b) Streets and Highways: ADOT is as varied, with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees responsible for the maintenance and during the summer time in the desert valleys, and falling operation of over 6,800 miles of state into the single digits and below in the high-altitude deserts highway throughout Arizona. However, and mountains of the north. influence of the ADOT Bicycle and Population – The estimated population of Arizona in July Pedestrian Program expands beyond the 2005 was 6,044,985. The population increased nearly state-owned highways. Programs 40% between 1990 and 2000. implemented by the ADOT Bicycle and Demographics – The people of Arizona are as diverse as Pedestrian Program serve cyclists on all the topography and climate. Over ¼ of the population is of Arizona roadways, including local city and Hispanic origin. Nearly 13% of the population is age 65 or county owned roads. In total, there are over, higher than the national average of 12.4%. more than 60,000 miles of roadways in Arizona. c) Problem or Deficiency: The awareness of behavior that improves the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians needs to be better understood by bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists and police officers. Many cyclists and pedestrians are unfamiliar with the “rules of the road” and often place themselves in dangerous situations. Examples include cyclists who ride on the wrong side of the road, or who run stops signs and red lights. Enforcement of existing bicycle and pedestrian laws and regulations is important to reducing the number of cyclists and pedestrians fatalities and injuries on Arizona roadways. Continued education and training of public safety officers is critical, so in turn they can enforce existing laws and regulations. Areas to target enforcement at bicyclists include: • • • Driving at night without lights or required reflectors. Riding the wrong way in a traffic lane or on the wrong side of the road. Running a stop sign or yield sign. Equally important, it is typical to see motorists driving on Arizona roadways in a manner that is especially unsafe to bicyclists and pedestrians. Areas to focus enforcement at the motorist include: • • Failing to yield the right of way to a pedestrian or cyclist when turning at intersections or driveways, entering a roadway, changing lanes, or to pedestrians in or entering cross walks. Overtaking bicycles in areas where it cannot be done safely (not giving bicyclists the required threefoot separation). Training and education of public safety and enforcement officers is needed to raise their awareness of cyclist and pedestrian laws and regulations. Officers who complete the curriculum will be better prepared to informally educate cyclists and pedestrians as part of their routine patrol and enforcement activities. Public safety officers assigned to bike patrol are particularly suited to enforce laws and regulations that pertain to bicyclists and pedestrians. The safety awareness materials could include specific suggestions and guidelines for bike patrol officers. Is the Proposal Enforcement Related: No, although this proposal, which is focused on training and education, is anticipated to increase enforcement awareness of bicycle and pedestrian laws statewide. 2. ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE PROBLEM There have been no specific efforts to focus attention on this type of training. A study of all traffic-related Arizona Revised Statutes is included in law enforcement training. The current class roster of the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board does not include specific training on this subject. 3. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Historically, the emphasis of bicycle and pedestrian programs has been on providing facilities. As communities, agencies, and programs gained experience, they began to realize that they couldn’t solve all bicycle and pedestrian issues simply by constructing facilities. For example, some safety problems are more easily solved through multi-faceted programs than through facilities. As a result, the concept of the "3E" program emerged, combining the elements of Engineering, Education, and Enforcement. The objective of the Public Safety/Law Enforcement Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Awareness Training Curriculum is to Educate the public through Enforcement. The approach will be to: • • • 4. Work with the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (AZ POST) to develop training materials and determine the format for the materials (e.g. DVD to mail, PowerPoint slide presentation, handout booklet). Develop Bicycle and Pedestrian safety awareness training materials within an eight-month time period. Review these materials with the AZ Post and determine how they can be incorporated into on-going or new training programs within a six-month period, including as a course to satisfy continuing education requirements. METHOD OF PROCEDURE The methods used to solve the problem and meet the project objectives include: a. Meet with Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board to discuss how the development of training materials would be incorporated into the existing AZ POST training curriculum; the format of the courses; and whether the course would be a stand-alone course or incorporated as a module of a longer class. b. Consultant will prepare a detailed outline of course elements and description of examples to be used in the training materials. This will be reviewed by the ADOT Project Manager, and refined. c. Review the detailed outline with the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board with representatives of the Pima Association of Government and the Maricopa Association of Government and revise the outline, if necessary. d. Prepare draft training course materials, using the detailed outline as a basis for the training materials. e. Review the draft training course materials with ADOT, the AZ Post, and possibly MPO representatives. f. Revise the draft course materials as necessary. g. Submit the final course materials. It is anticipated both hard copy and an electronic version of the course materials will be prepared. The total time required to complete the project is estimated to be eight months. This estimate is based on: • Two months to initially coordinate and prepare an initial and final detailed outline of the material. • Six months to prepare the draft training materials, receive comments on the draft, and prepare a revised final submittal. 5. BUDGET Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division BUDGET I. Personnel Services $0.00 II. Employee Related Expenses $0.00 III. Professional and Outside Services IV. Travel In-State Mileage expense 27,000 27,000 500 500 V. Travel Out-of-State $0.00 VI. Materials and Supplies 2,000 Miscellaneous Educational Materials VII. Other Expenses VIII. Capital Outlay TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 2,000 $0.00 $0.00 $29,500 6. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL Project Director: Dale Buskirk Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602-712-8143 Fax: 602-256-7659 dbuskirk@azdot.gov Project Administrator: Michael Sanders Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602-712-8141 Fax: 602-712-3046 msanders@azdot.gov A.2 Funding Proposal Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Application for Public Education Campaign 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities PROPOSAL SUMMARY SHEET FOR GOHS USE ONLY PROPOSAL NUMBER 2007 - ____________ AGENCY: Arizona Department of Transportation AGENCY CEO: Victor Mendez MAILING ADDRESS: 206 S. 17th Avenue, Mail Drop 310B CITY: Phoenix COUNTY: Maricopa AGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER: (602) 712-7227 ZIP: 85007 FAX: 602-712-256-6941 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT DIRECTOR: Dale Buskirk E-MAIL: DBuskirk@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8143 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Sanders E-MAIL: MSanders@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8141 SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL: This proposal is to develop a public education campaign to increase the safety awareness of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists on Arizona roadways. The awareness campaign will be targeted toward the general public throughout all of Arizona including in metropolitan areas, rural areas, and on tribal lands. TOTAL AMOUNT OF REQUEST: GOHS USE ONLY: $_125,000.00___________ AGENCY COVER LETTER (A transmittal letter from Mr. Victor Mendez, Director, ADOT, is transmitted separately.) PROJECT PROPOSAL OUTLINE NARRATIVE 1. BACKGROUND / PROBLEM a) General Characteristics: The applicant agency, the Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division, supports and manages the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. The purpose of the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian program is to plan, develop, and support implementation of facilities and programs that serve the mobility needs and improve the accessibility and safety of bicyclists and pedestrians on Arizona roadways. Arizona Facts b) Streets and Highways: ADOT is Climate – The topography of the State of Arizona ranges responsible for the maintenance and from low-lying deserts in the south to high-elevation operation of over 6,800 miles of state mountain peaks in the north. The weather and climate are highway throughout Arizona. However, as varied, with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees in influence of the ADOT Bicycle and the summer time in the desert valleys, and falling into the Pedestrian Program expands beyond the single digits and below in the high-altitude deserts and state-owned highways. Programs mountains of the north. implemented by the ADOT Bicycle and Population – The estimated population of Arizona in July Pedestrian Program serve cyclists on all 2005 was 6,044,985. The population increased nearly Arizona roadways, including local city 40% between 1990 and 2000. and county owned roads. In total, there Demographics – The people of Arizona are as diverse as are more than 60,000 miles of roadways the topography and climate. Over ¼ of the population is of in Arizona. Hispanic origin. Nearly 13% of the population is age 65 or over, higher than the national average of 12.4%. c) Problem or Deficiency: The education of bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists is a key component to reduce vehicle and bicycle/pedestrian conflicts. For bicyclists to safely travel with motorists, bicyclists need to practice safe cycling habits that exhibit knowledge of the “rules of the road.” Like drivers, bicyclists must understand and obey the rules and laws that apply. Likewise, pedestrians must also understand and obey rules and laws if they are to coexist safely with vehicles. Drivers also can be made to be more aware and careful around bicyclists and pedestrians through safety and education campaigns and through spot enforcement programs. Educating the public can provide the bicyclist, pedestrian and motorist the knowledge and skills necessary for each to more safely coexist. 2. ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE PROBLEM ADOT has devoted significant efforts over the past several years through the development of the Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. However, ADOT recognizes that there is significant work yet to be completed. To guide ADOT’s efforts in educating cyclists, motorists, and pedestrians, an Education Plan was developed that identifies five focus areas for improving bicycling and pedestrian safety. These are: • • • Safety Education Training; Safe Routes to School; Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Training; • • Safety Awareness Campaign; and Archived Data. As part of the Safety Education Training focus area, the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Program developed and distributed the following educational materials: • • • Bicycle Share the Road Guide Sharing the Road with Pedestrians Guide Arizona Bicycling Street Smarts As funding becomes available, additional elements of the Education Plan are being developed and implemented. 3. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of the Statewide Safety Awareness Campaign will further the implementation of the Education Plan of the ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. Specifically, the purpose of the Statewide Safety Awareness Campaign will be to: • • Increase Arizona bicyclists and pedestrians’ knowledge of safe practices, laws, and regulations. Increase Arizona motorists’ knowledge of bicycle and pedestrian laws, regulations, and safe practices. The Statewide Safety Awareness Campaign will improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety by educating the general public of the “rules of the road” for bicyclists and pedestrians. Specific strategies that could be employed include: • • • • • • Develop an attractive poster displaying, for example; “rules of the road”, “give a bicyclist five (5) feet”, facts on bike helmet use, and dangers of riding a bike against traffic. These can be widely distributed in schools, libraries, community centers and other public places, such as malls. Placing messages on transit buses and at bus stops, on light rail and at light rail stations. Using billboards. Distributing educational booklets/pamphlets that were developed by the ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program statewide. Developing articles for print media, and radio and TV public service announcements (PSA). For example, a PSA can inform motorists how to “share the road” with bicyclists. Sharing the road is something many motorists are uncomfortable with because motorists were never really taught how to safely deal with bicyclist when learning to drive. Nor do many motorists understand that the cyclist has a legitimate right to be on the road and that riding in the gutter or on the sidewalk is, in most instances, less safe. These and other messages should reach a larger audience than can be reached through a classroom setting. Remake/update driver education videos on bicycle/vehicle safety for the Defensive Driving School Program. Incorporate this video into the Defensive Driving School Program. Currently, the 12-minute video describes bicyclists as a “hazard.” Such terminology does not foster mutual respect between cyclists and vehicles. Thousands of individuals each year, essentially a captive audience, take the Defensive Driving Course instead of getting points on their license. 4. METHOD OF PROCEDURE The public education media campaign will be targeted towards the general public, will be bilingual (English and Spanish), and will also be implemented on tribal lands. The following activities will be followed to develop and implement the Statewide Safety Awareness Campaign: • • • • • ADOT will coordinate the media campaign with the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety. All media material will be approved by the GOHS. Distribute the Arizona Pedestrian and Bicyclist Share the Road Documents. Identify bicyclist and bicycle/motor vehicle safety issues and statewide problem locations. Collect bicycle and bicycle/motor vehicle crash data, citation data, and survey law enforcement agencies and medical facilities on the types of crashes occurring. Develop a Safety Awareness Campaign and present it to the Statewide Bicycle/Pedestrian Steering Committee and to the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety. Obtain the required professional services to design required poster program and Public Service Announcements. 5. BUDGET Until the details of the Safety Awareness Campaign are developed, it is difficult to determine a precise budget amount. Consultant services will be required to develop the graphics for posters, and to develop the video presentation. Final costs will be determined in conjunction with GOHS. The proposed program budget is outlined in the following table. Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division BUDGET I. Personnel Services $ 0.00 II. Employee Related Expenses $ 0.00 III. Professional and Outside Services IV. Advertising/Public Relations Consultant Services (develop posters, video, PSA’s, etc.) Travel In-State V. Travel Out-of-State VI. Materials and Supplies VII. Posters, brochures, etc. Other Expenses VIII. Capital Outlay TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $75,000 $75,000 $0.00 $0.00 $50,000 $50,000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $125,000 6. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL Project Director: Dale Buskirk Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602- 712-7431 Fax: 602-256-7659 dbuskirk@azdot.gov Project Administrator: Michael Sanders Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602-712-8141 Fax: 602-712-3046 MSanders@azdot.gov A.3 Funding Proposal to Governor’s Office of Highway Safety for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Training Course 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities A. PROPOSAL SUMMARY SHEET FOR GOHS USE ONLY PROPOSAL NUMBER 2007 - ____________ AGENCY: Arizona Department of Transportation AGENCY CEO: Victor Mendez MAILING ADDRESS: 206 S. 17th Avenue, Mail Drop 310B CITY: Phoenix COUNTY: Maricopa AGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER: (602) 712-7227 ZIP: 85007 FAX: 602-712-6941 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT DIRECTOR: Dale Buskirk E-MAIL: DBuskirk@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8143 PLEASE INDICATE WHO WILL SERVE AS PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Sanders E-MAIL: MSanders@azdot.gov PHONE: (602) 712-8141 SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL: This proposal is to provide funding to conduct a series of Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design workshops throughout the State of Arizona that will increase the knowledge and design skills of engineers and planners for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The proper design of such facilities will improve the safety of the bicyclist and the pedestrian. TOTAL AMOUNT OF REQUEST: GOHS USE ONLY: $ 62,780.00 B. AGENCY COVER LETTER (A transmittal letter from Mr. Victor Mendez, Director, ADOT, is transmitted separately.) C. PROJECT PROPOSAL OUTLINE NARRATIVE 1. BACKGROUND / PROBLEM a) General Characteristics: The applicant agency, the Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division, supports and manages the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. The purpose of the Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian program is to plan, develop, and support implementation of facilities and programs that serve the mobility needs and improve the Arizona Facts accessibility and safety of bicyclists and Climate – The topography of the State of Arizona ranges pedestrians on Arizona roadways. from low-lying deserts in the south to high-elevation mountain peaks in the north. The weather and climate are b) Streets and Highways: ADOT is as varied, with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees responsible for the maintenance and during the summer in the desert valleys and falling into operation of over 6,800 miles of state the single digits and below in the high-altitude deserts and highway throughout Arizona. However, mountains of the north. influence of the ADOT Bicycle and Population – The estimated population of Arizona in July Pedestrian Program expands beyond the 2005 was 6,044,985. The population increased nearly state-owned highways. Programs 40% between 1990 and 2000. implemented by the ADOT Bicycle and Demographics – The people of Arizona are as diverse as Pedestrian Program serve cyclists on all the topography and climate. Over ¼ of the population is of Arizona roadways, including local city and Hispanic origin. Nearly 13% of the population is age 65 or county-owned roads. In total, there are over, higher than the national average of 12.4%. more than 60,000 miles of roadways in Arizona. c) Problem or Deficiency: Approximately 20 percent of U.S. citizens, or nearly 41 million people, ride bicycles at least one or more times per month. Bicycling and walking are basic, fundamental modes of transportation that in today’s motorized world of travel are viable and necessary options to help manage our circulation and congestion issues. In recent years, the availability of federal, state, and local transportation funding for bicycle and pedestrian facilities has resulted in a significant increase in the number of facilities being planned, designed, and constructed. However, there are no federal design standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, though a number of design resources exist including the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Proper application of these resources for the design and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities requires significant engineering judgment. Education of engineers and planners throughout Arizona, including state, city, county, and tribal staff, is needed to help them learn how to properly apply these guidelines to design and construct safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 2. ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE PROBLEM The Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan was developed in two phases. Phase I, which began in April 2002, provided a review of existing conditions and development of a Statewide Bicycle Network, identified design guidelines for the design of safer bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and provided recommendations for bicycle and pedestrian programs that, when implemented, will improve the accommodation and safety of bicycles and pedestrians on Arizona Highways. Development and implementation of several of the most critical Phase I recommendations began in Phase II. Phase II included the production of a Statewide Bicycle User Map, Bicycle Share the Road Guide, Sharing the Road with Pedestrians Guide, Arizona Bicycling Street Smarts Brochure, website enhancements, a Grant and Funding Plan, an Education Plan, and a Pedestrian Action Plan. The need to educate engineers and planners of bicycle and pedestrian design guidelines and standards was identified in Phase II. 3. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Workshop is to further the implementation of the ADOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program, and specifically to improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety by educating engineers and planners of bicycle and pedestrian facility design considerations. 4. METHOD OF PROCEDURE A NHSTA/FHWA approved course curriculum will be selected in consultation with the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety. A list of existing courses is identified in Table 1. The course may be modified, in consultation with GOHS, to meet local Arizona agencies’ needs. Two course curriculums may be selected— one specifically for bicycle facilities and one specifically for pedestrian facilities. Attendance at the workshop will be targeted toward public agency staff from all agencies throughout Arizona including ADOT staff, local cities and counties, and tribal entities. The workshops will be held in multiple locations throughout the state including in major metropolitan areas (Phoenix, Tucson), smaller cities (Yuma, Flagstaff, Kingman), and on tribal lands. It is anticipated that the workshops could be completed within a reasonable timeframe, as workshop content is based on existing curriculum and courses. Course Title National Highway Institute, Pedestrian Facility Design Course Table 1 – Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Courses Length Course Cost Course Description 1 ½ days $310 per participant Target audience are engineers with planning, design, construction, or maintenance responsibilities; pedestrian and bicycle specialists; planners; disability and orientation specialists, transportation planners, architects, landscape architects, as well as decision-makers at the project planning level. This course broadens the design user to include persons with disabilities, offers class design exercises, and demonstrates how designing facilities for pedestrians can be done while also meeting the needs of other facility users such as motorists and bicyclists. Table 1 – Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Courses (continued) Course Title Length Course Cost Course Description National Highway Institute, Bicycle Facility Design Course 1 ½ days $260 per participant Target audience is federal, state, or local engineers with planning, design, construction, or maintenance responsibilities; bicycle specialists; transportation planners; landscape architects, as well as decision-makers at the project planning level. This course employs the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999 edition) as the source document. Designing Streets for Pedestrians (Michael Ronkin) Option # 1 2- and 3day combined bike and pedestrian courses; Standard fee is $1,500 per workshop, plus direct expenses, $750 for modification of curriculum to include in-depth local focus. Focus is on street designs that better accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. The courses can be customized to fit local needs. Course content includes: - Introduction - Basics of sidewalk design - Other sidewalk design issues - ADA “Universal Design” - Street crossings (mostly midblock) - Intersection design Part 1 and Part 2 Designing Streets for Bicyclists (Michael Ronkin) Option #2 1- or 2-day separate bicycle or pedestrian facility design courses also available. Assume 30 participants at each workshop, cost is $75 each, plus approximately $50 per participant for facility/room rental and miscellaneous costs. Course content includes: - The principles of bicycling - On-road bikeways - Surface design details - Restriping roads with bike lanes - Intersection design - Signing and marking - Shared use paths - Bicycle parking - Advanced bikeway designs 5. BUDGET As illustrated in Table 1 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Courses, there is a considerable range in program costs dependent upon the number of workshops that are held and the number of attendees at each workshop. The final decision as to the number of workshops held and the number of attendees at each workshop would be made in consultation with GOHS and dependent upon the funding provided. All workshops will be held in Arizona. No out-of-state travel would be required. It is anticipated that approximately 30 participants would attend each workshop. Workshops would be held, at a minimum in Flagstaff, Phoenix, Tucson, and Yuma. Particular outreach would be extended to tribal entities to encourage their participation and could also be held on tribal lands and in other rural locations throughout the state. Alternatively, funding could be provided for travel and lodging accommodations for participants from outlying areas and tribal entities to attend workshops in the metropolitan areas. The proposed program budget is outlined in the following table. Agency: Arizona Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Division BUDGET I. Personnel Services $ 0.00 II. Employee Related Expenses $ 0.00 III. Professional and Outside Services Course registration fee for National Highway Institute, Pedestrian Facility Design Course (150 participants at $310.00/participant)* IV. $46,500 $46,500 Travel In-State $14,280 Ground Transportation** $6,000 Per Diem (30 people, 2 days)** $2,280 Lodging** $6,000 V. Travel Out-of-State VI. Materials and Supplies VII. Miscellaneous course materials, advertising costs, postage, etc. Other Expenses $0.00 $2,000 $2,000 $ 0.00 VIII. Capital Outlay $ 0.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $62,780 * Final registration costs to be identified upon selection of course curriculum ** Assume 30 people travel 250 miles from rural areas and tribal lands, 2 nights lodging, 2 nights per diem. Final number of individuals to be accommodated to be determined in consultation with GOHS. 6. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL Project Director: Dale Buskirk Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602- 712-7431 Fax: 602-256-7659 dbuskirk@azdot.gov Project Administrator: Michael Sanders Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Mail Drop 310B Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: 602-712-8141 Fax: 602-712-3046 MSanders@azdot.gov A.4 Proposed ADOT Bicycle Policy Revisions Proposed modifications to ADOT Bicycle Policy are shown in bold. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities MGT 02-1 BICYCLE POLICY Purpose To establish uniform guidelines for accommodating bicycle travel on the State Highway System. Authority Arizona Revised Statute 28-812 Traffic laws apply to persons riding bicycles grants bicycle riders all the rights and subjects them to all the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle except where special regulations apply. Arizona Revised Statute 28-641 Traffic Control Device Manual and Specifications requires ADOT to adopt a manual for a uniform system of traffic control devices that correlates with the most recent edition of the national manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. Arizona Revised Statute 28-733 Restrictions on use of Controlled Access Highway authorizes ADOT to prohibit the use of any part of a controlled access highway by bicyclists. Requires ADOT to regulate prohibitions on controlled access highways through official signs. (Note: See reference 3.a. below) References 1. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. 2. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 9 –“Traffic Controls for Bicycle Facilities” 3. ADOT Traffic Engineering Policies, Guidelines and Procedures a. PGP # 1030 “Controlled Access Highways as Bikeways” b. PGP # 480 “Continuous Longitudinal Rumble Strips” c. PGP # 1031 “Signing and Marking of Shared-Use Paths” Definitions “Shared Roadway”(AASHTO) a roadway which is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel. This may be an existing roadway, street with wide curb lanes, or road with paved shoulders. “Bicycle Lane“(AASHTO) a portion of a roadway which has been designated by striping, signing, and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. “Shared Use Path”(AASHTO) a bikeway physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent right-ofway. Shared use paths may be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers and other nonmotorized users. “Bikeway” (AASHTO and MUTCD) a generic term for any road, street, path, or way which in some manner is specifically designated for bicycle travel, regardless of whether such facilities are designated for the exclusive use of bicycles or are to be shared with other transportation modes. “Designated Bicycle Route” (MUTCD) a system of bikeways designated by the jurisdiction having authority with appropriate directional and informational route markers, with or without specific bicycle route numbers. Bicycle routes, which might be a combination of various types of bikeways, should establish a continuous routing. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities Policy 1. It is ADOT’s goal to develop a transportation infrastructure that provides safe and convenient bicycle access. ADOT further advocates that bicyclists have the right to operate in a legal manner on all roadways open to public travel, with the exception of fully controlled-access highways. Bicyclists may use fully controlled-access highways in Arizona except where specifically excluded by regulation and where posted signs give notice of a prohibition. In support of, and in accord with the foregoing, it is ADOT’s policy to: a. Include provisions for bicycle travel in all new major construction and major reconstruction projects on the state highway system. New bridge and roadway widening projects are normally considered as being within the scope of major construction or major reconstruction. Pavement preservation, minor and spot improvement projects are not included; existing widths for bicycles will be maintained. The scoping documents for new construction and reconstruction will define the parameters for inclusion of bicycle travel. b. Utilize the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities as the design guide for roadway features to accommodate bicycles. c. Utilize the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 9 as adopted in accordance with ARS 28-641 for design of traffic controls for bicycle facilities. d. Provide shared roadway cross-section templates as a minimum condition with new major construction and major reconstruction projects, regardless of the presence of a shared use path. e. Consider, as a part of major new construction and major reconstruction in urban areas, wide curb lanes up to 15’in width (exclusive of gutter pan) and placement of a stripe at the vehicle lane edge where appropriate. This decision will be made on a project basis weighing such factors as location, vehicular traffic, grades, anticipated bicycle usage, and right of way availability. f. Consider bicycle lanes for inclusion with major new construction or major reconstruction when: 1) incremental costs for construction and maintenance are funded by a local agency AND 2) the bicycle lane is included as a part of an adopted bicycle facilities plan. g. As a part of major new construction and major reconstruction, ADOT will fund and construct at-grade or grade separated (including bridges) street or roadway crossings of state highway system roadways to meet cross section templates accommodating bicyclists that have been adopted as standard by the local agency. The limits of construction are determined on a project by project basis, are normally within the ADOT right of way, and may include appropriate transitions to existing roadways outside of ADOT right of way. h. Accommodate shared use paths within the ADOT right of way when the facilities are: 1) designed and located in accordance with accepted criteria for a proper and safe facility AND 2) funded and properly maintained by the local agency. i. Utilize the ADOT Traffic Engineering PGP # 1030 to designate route sections where bicycle traffic is prohibited on fully access-controlled State Highways. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities j. Utilize the ADOT Traffic Engineering PGP # 480 for placement of longitudinal rumble strips on State Highways. k. Use pavement surfacing materials that provide reasonably smooth surfaces on travel lanes and shoulders in conjunction with paving projects. l. Evaluate and consider the impacts of bicyclists when restriping roadways in conjunction with new construction, reconstruction, pavement preservation and minor spot improvement projects. m. Utilize Intergovernmental Agreements to define funding and maintenance responsibilities with local governments for bicycle facilities within State highway right-of-way. 2. It is ADOT’s Policy not to: a. Reduce existing travel lane widths to accommodate bicycle traffic unless supported by a traffic study. Concurrence by the State Traffic Engineer and the Assistant Engineer, Roadway Engineering Group are required. b. Sign or designate bikeways on any roadways on the State Highway System or roads on Stateowned right of way without concurrence of the District Engineer and State Bicycle Coordinator. c. Sign or designate sidewalks as bicycle routes or bikeways. d. Use transportation enhancement funds for maintenance of bicycle facilities. e. Mark or sign sidewalks or shared-use paths on State right-of -way parallel and adjacent to roadways for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists per ADOT Traffic Engineering PGP # 1031 3. It is ADOT’s policy to require written approval from the State Traffic Engineer and the Assistant State Engineer, Roadway Engineering Group in consultation with the State Bicycle Coordinator for any variations or exceptions to this policy. 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities A.5 Bicycle and Pedestrian related projects in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 091374015 ADOT BP PH III Summary (01-30-07).doc 01/30/07 Appendix Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase III Activities ADOT 2006-2010 5-Year Construction Program, Arizona Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvements nR 89A ï!P 1 r ive ( ' & % 15 û6 A Fredonia Elev 4600 PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT 1 Page × Elev 4380 89A !®v P ï ! ( Marble Canyon La ke ! ( ow e ll Ô !( A Riv er 89 Co lo ra do Shonto GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK ! ( Colorado River HUALAPAI VALLEY JOSHUA TREES 1 Peach Springs Truxton A̧ Seligman Elev 5250 ! ( 40 Kingman Elev 3325 ( ' & % ï Topock Marsh YA VAPAI 1 93 Paulden v ® Prescott v Elev 5354 ® 50 Parker Elev 420 LA PAZ Wilhoit Imperial Res ervoir Riv er Co lo ra do Wellton Elev 256 1 P ! ï Cottonwood Elev 3310 Prescott Valley Elev 5100 é A 44 58 206 259 ½ 60 A 1 v ® ( ' & % 8 New River ! ( Elev 1983 147 301 Star Valley 1 % ( ' & Phoenix Elev 1092 Sentinel Ç A É A Punkin Center ! ( GILA se ve lt L ak e É (!PA ' & % Eloy Elev 1565 Sells Elev 2360 v ® P ! ! ( Lukeville Menagers Lak e Á A Mammoth Elev 2348 ! ( ! Catalina ( v ® 169 v ® !× ®v P 237 8 ®v 249! È150 176 (A 132 41 19 205 P ! ù A × ! (Green Valley ï 19 5 10 20 Miles ! ( Sasabe M 60 Nutrioso 191 Alpine 180 1 191 1 Bylas Elev 3500 GRAHAM Gil a P ! P! ! P ï Safford Elev 2920 v ® A ö ! ( ì A 191 Clifton Elev 3464 Pï ! À A A ¾ 1 1 ï!( 191 70 Duncan Elev 3535 297 Bonita 1 191 367 COCHISE ( ï ' & % 10 Willcox Elev 4167 P ! Dos Cabezas ! ( ï Benson Elev 3580 v ® A18 Å ï!( Å A ! ( ï P ! 1 10 ! ( St. Davids Pearce ! ( Tombstone Elev 4539 AA Ï Ä !P P !  A P A ! Ï 387 240 S A N T A Elfrida ! ( 1 167 191 v ® ! ( Ð A Palominas à A 276 Huachuca City Elev 4440 Sierra Vista Elev 4600 á A 191 ( ' & %  A Nogales ÄCRUZ A A ó ä!PElev 3865 A v ® Riv er Pima Elev 2848 Thatcher Elev 2929 Patagonia Elev 4044 418 1!P Morenci Elev 4710 P ! Sonoita ( ' & % 0 Whiteriver Elev 5224 Tucson Elev 2389 Sahuarita Elev 2540 Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Greer 1 1 ! ( ! ( 1 Nelson Reservoir Crecent Lak e Big Lake P ! 145 308 347 436 ( ' & % ð A ! ( A ÷ íA A ê Sunrise Lake Springerville Elev 6965 ! P P ! v ® CORONADO TRAIL Ú 70 A ! ( ! ( Peridot San Carlos Reservoir ( 421A ' & % ¿ PIMA ! (San Luis A é ü A v ® Winkelman Elev 1972 Coolidge Elev 1400 Picacho Reservoir 10 Eagar Elev 7000 Lyman Lake ! ( Fort Apache Florence Elev 1490 6 P ! 191 60 ¼ A ! ( St Johns Elev 5725 1 1ï 1 v ® P ! ! ( © A San Carlos Superior Elev 2820 10 ! (Quijotoa Þ A 60 Globe Elev 3541 1 Zion Reserv oir 1 TONTO NATIONAL MONUMENT Miami Elev 3438 Florence Junction 191 180 Concho P60 ! v ® é A P! ! P Cedar Creek ï © A 1 1 White Mountain Lak e Show Low Elev 6331 Oracle Junction È A é A r Gila Rive PINA L 6 A Ç Riv er Pinetop-Lakeside Elev 7000 ò A A ã ï !(6 Apac he Lake Chandler Elev 1213 Stanfield ! ( rad o Snowflake Elev 5582 ! ( Roosevelt Casa Grande Elev 1395 ( ' & % olo Jakes Corner ( 1 ' & % Gila Bend Elev 735 le C P ! ! P Young Mesa Elev 1273 6 Litt Taylor Elev 5700 ! ( 266 P ! î A Heber Christopher Creek ï !( Fountain Hills Elev 2200 v ® Why ADOT Roadway Holbrook Elev 5075 øA A ¿ Roo ×% A 17 ( ' & Ä ! (Elev 1800 Bike/Pedestrian Related Improvements P ®v ! 40 PETRIFIED FOREST NATIONAL PARK Õ A É A ï 36 ( ' & % v ® ! ( Bartlett Reservoir Window Rock Elev 4000 ! ( Sanders PAINTED DESERT ¿ A ï!P 334 METEOR CRATER Rye Horseshoe Reservoir Ajo Legend 40 É 322 A ! (A é375 San Luis Elev 136 August 2006 ( ' & % ! ( ! ( v ® Tonopah HOT SPRINGS ! (Dateland A ïÕ 33 254 Payson Elev 4930 P ! FRANCISCAN MISSION 1 É A Riv er Leupp ! (! ( Pine ! (! ( 17 v ® ë A HUBBELL TRADING POST 191 rad o Sunrise é A ( ' & ï% Wickenburg Elev 2309 olo Long Lake Strawberry NATURAL BRIDGE v ® ! ( le C Tremaine Lake ! ( ! ( Klagetoh Litt Camp Verde Elev 3160 ! ( Maricopa er R iv Gila P 80 ! 306 39 ! ( Mormon Lake 6 ! ( Tacna Non-ADOT Roadways Keams Canyon ! ( AWATOVI RUINS GREENLEE YU MA Fergus on Lake APACHE HOPI VILLAGES 54 47 ×! v ® P 163®v ïÊ 329 11 10 ï É A ! ( A 335 × × A Ê A ! 242 198 ( 325 30 ®viver! 119 260 328 P vA ® æ 24 R v ® P ! Sa lt P ! P ®v! ! P 343 275 427 330 60 157 235 10 ® 250 ï!P 437 MA RICOPA v! P60 409 265 ! ( 60 ®v 275 292 ¿ A 318 252 437 Á A þA A Û A Ç382 349 A É v ® 199 v ® è !( 298A 71 â A ! ( ú !PA ñ!P õ A A 229 291 P ! úA ¿ A ï!( ï !( A Æ !P®v A ñ 8 ( ' & % 1 Gadsden 60 ( ' & % Mayer 222 ï v ® P 133 ï ! 27 ®v 218 P95 ! 307 ï!P!( 267 378 247 189 v ® 1 !Pï Salome ! ( 251 v ® P ! Black Canyon City Elev 2000 Hope 95 Yuma Elev 141 ! ( Congress WALNUT CANYON NATIONAL MONUMENT er Riv 1 ! ( ! ( 60 P ! ! ( de 10 ï ( ' & % ! (Aguila Wenden Quartzsite Elev 875 6 Lower Lake Mary 46 Ì 314 A P! ! (®v! P 246A Ü Cordes Junction ! ( Peeples Valley ! ( Yarnell º A ! ( » A P× ! r Ve Ñ A × Ìï A 17 Ù ¹A A ! ( A Ë Hillside Bouse Hotevilla Sunrise Springs v ® Sedona Elev 4240 × Rive r Dewey Alamo Lake P ! ! ( v ® 6 Flagstaff Elev 6905 Ì A P ! PA ! ¹ !( Bagdad Elev 4100 Ó A A Ò !( P ! v ® Ve rde ! P 419 P ! v ® Lake Havasu City Elev 482 Ë A ! ( Chino Valley Elev 4000 ! ( Ñ A Williams Elev 6770 CANYON DE CHELLY NATIONAL MONUMENT Cottonwood ë A SUNSET CRATER VOLCANO NATIONAL MONUMENT Upper Lake Mary Wikieup Lake Havasu P 224 ! × ! ( Cameron 89 ï P ! ! ( 353 40 Ñ A Ash Fork ( ' & % v ® v ® 180 389 P ! v ® 312 NAVAJO Tuba City Elev 4450 ® v 1 1 6 ª A GRAND CANYON CAVERNS P ! v ® 1 6 191 WUPATKI NATIONAL MONUMENT ! ( Many Farms Lake ! ( ! ( Hackberry P ! Many Farms 1 Gray Mountain ! ( «!( A × Bullhead City Elev 600 ª A MOHAVE Lake Mohave DAVIS DAM TUSAYAN RUIN Round Rock ! (160 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER GORGE COCONINO 93 California Mexico DINOSAUR TRACKS v ® Tusayan ! ( Rock Point Sa lt HOOVER DAM P ! ! ( ! ( LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA 64 ý A Tonalea The Gap 1 163 WHITE MESA NATURAL BRIDGE ¬ A Lake Mead ! ( Kaibito 160 Kayenta Elev 5798 6 89 89A FOUR CORNERS 1 MONUMENT VALLEY 1 NAVAJO NATIONAL MONUMENT 1 1 1 Jacob Lake P Riv er Vir gi × P ! Bisbee Elev 5490 v ®  A v ® P ! Douglas Elev 3990 ! (Chiricahua  A ADOT 2006-2010 5-Year Construction Program, Tucson Area Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 10 % ( ' & 421 145 308 347 436 0 2 4 8 Miles M ¿ A 169 Ina Rd Orange Grove Rd Sunrise Dr Sil Snyder Rd ve Sabino Canyon Rd d Swan Rd ll R 1st Ave rb e Saguaro National Park Fort Lowell Rd Grant Rd C a at lin a H w y Alvernon Wy Speedway Blvd nn ey 8 A ç Rd 22nd St Golf Links Rd Saguaro National Park Ajo W y Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 176 Kolb Rd 150 237 Ki Broadway Blvd O ld Los Reales Rd Sp an is h Tr l È A 10 % ( ' & Wentworth Rd Wilmot Rd 19 % ( ' & Houghton Rd Mis s io nR d ð A Sahuarita Rd August 2006 Legend Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Related Improvements Interstate Frontage Road Regionally Significant Non-ADOT Bikeway Arterial Roadways va Du lM in e Rd Country Club Rd Å A 18 Å A Ì A ADOT 2006-2010 5-Year Construction Program, Prescott Area Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvements W X W X W X Sedona Ë A SEDONA × 251 W X Ì A 46 Jerome Ì A 246 Ü 314 A W X Clarkdale Chino Valley 419 Cottonwood Sim Ì A m é A sH on Fain Rd Cr lo w W il Prescott Rd B Old W X k la c n yo Ca nH wy W X Prescott Valley W X l Rd pr in gs H il Ir o n S Robert Rd ee Glas sf kR d wy or d 80 Camp Verde ¹ A Ù A 17 % ( ' & Sen a tor W X Hwy Ë A August 2006 ¹ A Legend Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Ë A 0 3 6 12 Miles M Interstate Frontage Road Regionally Significant Non-ADOT Bikeway Arterial Roadway ADOT 2006-2010 5-Year Construction Program, Phoenix Area Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvements Carefree Hwy ½ A 147 301 44 58 206 259 Happy Valley Rd Pinnacle Peak Rd Deer Valley Rd Union Hills Rd × A Bell Rd Brown Rd Hawes Rd Sossaman Rd 47 260 275 335 437 Power Rd McDowell Rd Recker Rd å A McKellips Rd Higley Rd Val V ista Dr Gilbert Rd Lindsay Rd Mesa Dr 330 Greenfield Rd University Drive Ø A 16th S t 60 1 Broadway Rd Southern Ave Baseline Rd Guadalupe Rd Elliot Rd õ A McQueen Rd 10 % ( ' & Country Club Dr Warner Rd Alma School Rd 7th St 7th Ave 10 ( ' & % å A 24 198 Cooper Rd 27th A ve 35th A ve 43rd Ave 51st Ave 427 19th A ve 157 229 252 265 298 349 409 59th A ve 67th A ve 75th A ve 91st Ave 99th A ve 107th Ave 30 83rd Ave 10 ( ' & % 119 Dobson Rd McDowell Rd McClintock Dr Thomas Rd × A Rural Rd Indian School Rd 40th S t Camelback Rd É A 11 Lincoln Dr 32nd St 163 242 Bethany Home Rd 60 1 24th S t Glendale Ave Stapley Dr 329 Northern Ave 48th S t Olive Ave Ellsworth Rd Shea Blvd Peoria Ave 115th Ave Hayden Rd Ä 64th S t Cactus Rd 56th S t 17 % ( ' & Scottsdale Rd Greenway Rd Thunderbird Rd Ray Rd 60 Chandler Blvd 199 275 437 É A August 2006 É þA A Legend Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvement M É A Bike/Pedestrian Related Improvements Interstate Frontage Roads Regionally Significant Non-ADOT Bikeway Arterial Roadways è A 0 2 4 8 Miles California Ave 7E ADOT 2006-2010 5-Year Construction Program, Yuma Area Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 8th St 16th St 1 95 24th St co , + ) * 27 Ave 5E Ave 4E Ave 3E na o z Ave G ri A B8 40th St Somerton Ave i ex M 32nd St County 14th St 95 1 218 307 378 8 ( ' & % County 15th St County 16th St 133 247 267 August 2006 Legend Projects with Potential for Bike/Pedestrian Improvement M 0 1.5 3 6 Miles 189 Road Regionally Significant Non-ADOT Bikeway Interstate Frontage Road MAP ID 30 8 147 301 329 176 240 71 145 169 308 347 421 436 18 250 291 292 325 343 382 41 132 150 205 237 249 54 419 387 11 198 274 427 246 251 314 133 189 218 247 267 307 378 24 119 47 60 157 199 229 252 260 265 275 298 335 349 409 437 33 80 254 322 375 27 46 418 334 44 58 163 206 222 235 242 Road 07 99TH I 010 I 017 I 017 I 017 I 019 I 019 S 077 S 077 S 077 S 077 S 077 S 077 S 077 S 083 S 085 S 085 S 085 S 085 S 085 S 085 S 086 S 086 S 086 S 086 S 086 S 086 S 087 S 089 S 090 S 101 S 101 S 101 S 153UNBUILT S 179 S 179 S 179 S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 195UNBUILT S 202 S 202 S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 202UNBUILT S 260 S 260 S 260 S 260 S 260 S 280 SA089 SB019 SB040 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 060 AVE 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 6 Location I-10 TO MC 85 (99TH AVE) 6TH AVE TI SR 101L TO CAREFREE HIGHWAY (SR 74) SR 101L TO CAREFREE HIGHWAY (SR 74) BETHANY HOME RD TO NORTHERN AVE VALENCIA RD TO AJO WAY (JCT SR 86) DOE ST TO BAFFERT DR, NOGALES MP 145 - MP 147 TANGERINE RD - PINAL COUNTY LINE, PHASE I CALLE CONCORDIA - TANGERINE RD TANGERINE RD - PINAL COUNTY LINE, PHASE I TANGERINE RD - PINAL COUNTY LINE, PHASE I CALLE CONCORDIA - TANGERINE RD TANGERINE RD - PINAL COUNTY LINE, PHASE II HILTON RANCH RD TO 5 MILES SOUTH MC 85 TO SOUTHERN AVE MP 120.54 - MP 122.99 MP 139.01 - MP 141.71 SOUTHERN AVE TO I-10 MP 149.40 - MP 152.01 MP 130.71 - MP 137.00 EAST OF KITT PEAK (SR 386 - MP 140.8) EAST OF KITT PEAK (SR 386 - MP 140.8) VALENCIA RD - KINNEY RD MP 137.1 TO SR 386 (KITT PEAK) VALENCIA RD - KINNEY RD WEST OF KITT PEAK, PHASE III FOREST BOUNDARY TO NEW FOUR PEAKS MP 324.3 TO CENTER STREET CENTRAL AVE TO MOSON RD, E OF SIERRA VISTA PIMA RD, MCDOWELL RD - VIA LINDA, JPA PIMA RD EXTENSION, JPA PIMA RD EXTENSION, JPA SUPERIOR AVE - UNIVERSITY DR VILLAGE OF OAK CREEK TO NORTH FOREST BOUNDARY NORTH FOREST BOUNDARY TO SEDONA VILLAGE OF OAK CREEK TO NORTH FOREST BOUNDARY YUMA AREA SERVICE HWY AVE E 1/2 - AVE B 40TH STREET TO I-8 YUMA AREA SERVICE HWY YUMA AREA SERVICE HWY 40TH STREET TO I-8 40TH STREET TO I-8 RURAL RD TO SR 101L, WB 51ST AVE TO I-10 EAST/SANTAN TI UNIVERSITY DR - SOUTHERN AVE LINDSEY RD TO GILBERT RD I-10 WEST TO 51ST AVE POWER RD - UNIVERSITY DR I-10 / SR 51 TI TO SR 101L, EB I-10 WEST TO 51ST AVE UNIVERSITY DR - SOUTHERN AVE I-10 WEST TO 51ST AVE POWER RD - UNIVERSITY DR I-10 / SR 51 TI TO SR 101L, EB UNIVERSITY DR - SOUTHERN AVE I-10 WEST TO 51ST AVE I-10 / SR 51 TI TO SR 101L, EB POWER RD - UNIVERSITY DR LITTLE GREEN VALLEY COTTONWOOD TO CAMP VERDE DOUBTFUL CANYON SECTION LION SPRINGS SECTION DOUBTFUL CANYON SECTION I-8 TO B-8, SR 280 (AVE 3E) CEMENT PLANT ROAD - BLACK HILLS DRIVE DOE ST TO BAFFERT DR, NOGALES WINSLOW STREETS (TURNBACK) 303L (ESTRELLA) TO SR 101L (AGUA FRIA) 99TH AVE - 83RD AVE (INCLUDING NEW RIVER BRIDGE) SR 101L (AGUA FRIA) TO MCDOWELL RD 99TH AVE - 83RD AVE (INCLUDING NEW RIVER BRIDGE) 303L (ESTRELLA) TO SR 101L (AGUA FRIA) BOYCE THOMPSON STATE PARK SR 101L (AGUA FRIA) TO MCDOWELL RD Beginning Mile Post Ending Mile Post 0.00 0.01 260.99 260.99 215.00 224.00 215.00 224.00 204.90 204.91 58.70 62.30 1.72 3.08 145.00 147.00 82.00 87.82 77.50 77.51 82.00 87.82 82.00 87.82 77.00 82.00 82.00 87.82 44.00 49.00 150.40 152.50 120.54 122.99 139.01 141.71 152.00 154.52 149.40 152.01 130.71 137.00 133.30 140.80 133.30 140.80 159.50 166.10 137.10 141.40 159.50 166.10 141.40 145.70 194.00 203.00 324.30 324.31 323.50 325.50 42.00 49.00 48.00 49.00 48.00 48.00 0.00 0.00 304.50 310.00 310.10 313.40 304.50 310.00 0.00 26.00 5.50 9.08 25.96 27.40 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 25.96 27.40 25.96 27.40 8.00 10.00 0.00 0.01 27.80 27.81 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 23.30 27.80 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.01 27.80 27.81 0.00 0.01 23.30 27.80 0.00 10.00 27.80 27.81 0.00 0.01 0.00 10.00 23.30 27.80 263.10 270.00 214.00 214.01 269.00 272.50 258.00 260.00 269.00 269.00 0.00 1.30 349.00 351.20 1.72 3.08 251.90 257.50 138.00 149.00 148.90 150.50 148.90 161.90 148.00 148.01 138.00 149.00 220.00 220.01 148.90 161.90 CFY 2008 2006 2007 2007 2010 2007 2006 2007 2008 2006 2006 2008 2006 2009 2010 2006 2009 2006 2006 2009 2007 2008 2007 2008 2009 2006 2010 2007 2007 2010 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2009 2006 2006 2008 2010 2006 2006 2009 2008 2006 2008 2010 2006 2009 2008 2006 2010 2006 2009 2006 2008 2008 2006 2008 2010 2009 2009 2006 2006 2007 2006 2006 2009 2007 2009 2006 2007 2007 2010 Type of Work Widen roadway Sidewalks and artistic fencing Reconstruct & widen Reconstruct & widen Design / Construct pedestrian walkway along the frontage roads Widen Roadway Sidewalks, landscaping & scour retrofit Roadway Construction Construct roadway widening to 6 lanes Widen to 6 lanes Design (roadway widening to 6 lanes) Construct roadway widening to 6 lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Construct roadway widening to 6 lanes Design & construct roadway widening Construct Roadway Construct roadway Construct roadway Construct roadway Reconstruct & widen Roadway Reconstruction (utilities included) Construct roadway widening Design roadway widening Construct roadway widening to 4 lanes Widen roadway to 40' Design (roadway widening to 4 lanes) Design (roadway widening) Shoulder widening/median crossovers Construct 5 lane urban roadway Widen to 5 lanes Roadway Widening Construct Roadway Design Roadway Construct Roadway Construct roadway Construct roadway Construct roadway Construct New Roadway Construct 4 lane divided highway Construct roadway widening Construct New Roadway Construct new roadway Construct roadway widening Construct roadway widening Widen roadway Design roadway Construct Roadway Design & construct multi-use path Construct roadway Construct Roadway Widen roadway Construct roadway Construct Roadway Construct roadway Construct Roadway Widen roadway Construct Roadway Construct roadway Design roadway Construct Roadway Reconstruct Roadway Reconstruct roadway (IGA Repayment) Reconstruct Roadway Design (Roadway) Design (Roadway) Reconstruct Roadway Reconstruct roadway Sidewalks, landscaping & scour retrofit Reconstruct streets, curbs & sidewalks Widen roadway Widen roadway and bridge Design roadway Design widening Design roadway Construct road Widen roadway ADOT District E T E E E T T G T T T T T T T E Y Y E E Y T T T T T T E P S E E E E F F F Y Y Y Y Y Y Y E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E P P P P P Y P T H E E E E E G E County Name Maricopa Pima Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Pima Santa Cruz Gila Pima Pima Pima Pima Pima Pima Pima Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Pima Pima Pima Pima Pima Pima Maricopa Yavapai Cochise Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Yavapai Yavapai Yavapai Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma Yuma Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Gila Yavapai Gila Gila Gila Yuma Yavapai Santa Cruz Navajo Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Maricopa Gila Maricopa Type of Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement 259 318 328 330 50 353 224 36 39 167 266 276 297 306 312 367 389 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 060 U 093 U 093 U 160 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 U 191 83RD AVE & PEORIA FLORENCE JCT- QUEEN CREEK RUSSELL RD - RAGUS RD I-10 TO SR 101L (PRICE) SANTA MARIA RIVER - WICKENBURG ANTELOPE WASH VAN'S TRADING POST TO EAST OF SR 264 NAHATA' DZIIL RD - SANDERS TI BURNSIDE JUNCTION - NORTH, PH I ELFRIDA US 191, MP 355 - 356 (HARDSCRABBLE RD) ROPER LAKE STATE PARK TEN RANCH TO OWL CANYON (SEG III) BURNSIDE JUNCTION - NORTH CHINLE SOUTH MP 91.6 - MP 95.4 (SEGMENT II) CHINLE SOUTH 150.50 213.00 246.77 172.00 161.00 101.80 320.00 367.00 417.50 24.00 355.00 115.00 94.34 417.50 446.00 91.60 446.00 150.51 218.00 247.60 176.00 198.70 104.10 321.90 368.80 420.00 25.50 356.00 0.10 98.00 420.00 447.00 95.40 447.00 2006 2006 2006 2008 2006 2008 2006 2007 2006 2006 2006 2008 2008 2008 2010 2010 2009 Design & construct at-grade pedestrian crossing Reconstruct roadway (widening) New sidewalk & highway lighting Design general purpose lane Design (Roadway) Design new roadway Widening and drainage Reconstruct 3 bridges and roadway Design (widening) Construct pathway Reconstruct roadway & drainage Construct Road, PH II Construct parallel roadway Roadway Widening Roadway widening Construct parallel roadway Design roadway widening E G G E K K F H H S H S S H H S H Maricopa Pinal Gila Maricopa Yavapai Mohave Coconino Apache Apache Cochise Apache Graham Graham Apache Apache Graham Apache Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement Potential Bike/Pedestrian Improvement