frHWffiEffiIffiWffiMHW
FinalReport
Transpoftation
PlanUpdate

PreparedBy

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pase
. . . " . . - . . . ' . - . - . . . .1. . . '
. . .N. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTRODUCTIO
...........1
AND PT]RPOSE
STIJDYOVERVIEW
.........1
STIJDYPRODUCTS....
............."..... 1
AND PUBLICNN/OLVEMENT
AGENCYCOORDINATION
............3
OFTHEREPORT
ORGANIZATION
..........4
MO
I CN D I T I O N S . . - . - . . . . . . - . - . . . . . ' . . - . . . - ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . 4
H f l S T I N GS O C I O E C O N O C
........'....6
........
SYSTEM
STREET
E)flSTING
.....'-'..12
H i l S T I N GT R A F F I C O N D I T I O N S . . . . . . . . : . . . ' - . . . . . . .
.
"..'.....14
R O A D W A LYE V E LO FS E R V I C E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONDITIONS.
tr. E)ilSTING

m.

....,.".. L7
CONDITIONS.
FTj'TURE
'......l7
CONDITIONS.............
SOCIOECONOMIC
FUTURE
"...,...... 19
FUTURETRAFFICCONDITIONS.
19
.....................
NETWORK
AND COMMITTED
EXISTING
...-.-.22
.................
DEFICIENCIES
CAPACITY
ROADWAY

26
ROADWAYIMPROVEMENTS.....
tv. TRAFFICANALYSISOF ALTERNATTVE

A L T E R N A T wIEM P R O V E M E N T S ' . . . ' . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . - ' . . . . . . . . - . - . ' . . . . ' . " ' 2 6
43
SI'MMARYOF TTIEANALYSISOFIMPROVEMENTS...................,.....

v.

PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATIONPROGRAM.............. 44
TRANSPORTATION
.......,........4
PLAN.
TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDED
STUDIES
TRANSPORTATION
..............,....47
PLANNINGRECOMMENDATIONS
OTTIER
...............48
. . .N. . . . . . . . . . . .
IMPLEMENTATIO
...........
;...........'.......49
PROGRAM
IMPROVEMENT
TRANSPORTATION
........55
AND IJPDATING....,............
PLANMONITORING
.........,.56
MODEL
TRAFFICFORECASTING
.........s6
REVENUESOURCES

R E F E R E N C E S . . . . . ....-.........
APPENDD(A
APPENDD(B

. . . . . . . . .6. 0

LIST OF TABLES

I-1.

tr-l.
II-2.

tr-3.
tr4.
tr-5.
m-l.
fr- 2.
Itr-3.
IV-I.

rv-2.
rv-3.
v-l.
v-2.
v-3.
v4.
A-1.
B-1.

v2.
83.

LIST OF FIGURES
Paee

I-1.

AREA...........
STLIDY

A N A L Y S IZSO N E S . . . . . . . . . . . . ' - . : " " " " " " "
tr-l. T R A F F I C

rI-2. FUNCTIONALCLASSIFICATION........"""'
II-3.

""""""'5
"""""""""""8
"""' l0

OF LANES.....
NITMBER

""""""""""

LMfrS
tr4. S P E E D

tr-5. CURRENTAVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC."."...........
u-6. CuRRENTLEVELOFSERVICE.....'..-..."';"""
m-l. E)CSTINGAND COMMTTEDNETWORK

""""'
"""""""'
".'"""".,""""'

11
13
16
21

SERVICE- HilSTING AND COMMITTEDNETWORK""' 23
fr-z. 12OO|LEVIjLOF

m-3. 2OO7LEVEL OF SERVICE- E)flSTING AND COMMITTEDNETWORK."" 24
m-4. 2OL7LEVELOF SERVICE- DGSTING AND COMMTTED NETWORK""' 25
rv-l. 200TLEVELoFsERvIcE-ALTERNATTyEI-BASEzuTuRENETWoRK.30
tv-2. 20lTLEVELoFsERvIcE-ALTERNATIVEI-BASEFUTI']RENETWoRK.3l
IV-3. 20fl lilrwoF

- ALTERNATTVE
2-.'.--..'..."""""""""""""
SERVICE

32

- ALTERNATTVE
3..'..'.'.......""""""".'"""'
rv4. 2Or7LEVELOFSERVICE

33

- ALTERNATTVE
4.............'...'
""""""""""
Iv-5. 2017IJVEL OFSERVICE

34

w-6. 2017LEVELOF SERVICE- ALTERNATM 5 """""""""':"""""""""

35

- ALTERNATTVE
6.'.......-.....""".'""""".'"'
SERVICE
lv:1. 2Ot7LFIIIF'-OF

38

rv-8. 2Or7LEVELOFSERVICE-ALTERNATM 7 ...........-"""""""""""""

39

- ALTERNATTVE
'f|,-g. 2Ot7LEVELOF SERVICE
8 """""""""""""""""""

40

- ALTERNATTVE
9 """""""""""""""""""
w-10. 2ol7 LEVELOF SERVICE

41

Ll

LIST OF FIGLIRES (continued)
paee

v-l. ARIZONAIMPROVEMENTSAND LONG-RANGE
PLAN......
TRANSPORTATION

v-2. ARIZONA IMPROVEMENTSAND LONG.RANGE

...........'.""'45

PLAN- 2017TRAFFICVOLUMES...-.'.-.-...""""""
TRANSPORTATION

46

I. INTRODUCTION
STUDY OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE
ThepurposeoftheArieonaUpdateoftheColoradoRiverRegionalTransportationStudy
Transportation
*., io upa",. the Arizona portion of the 1993 Colorado River Regional
of Transportarion
StoOytCifnfSl. The study was conductedby the Arizooa Department
Mohave County. For this study, Bullhead
iaObii ir .""p"t rion witi Bullhead City and
on the cunent
iity *a Mohave County collected trafgrc volume data and information
populationand emPloYment.
Town of
The stuclyareafor the cRRTS shown in Figure I is comprisedof Bullhead ciw;
and
Nevada; City of Needles, California; Fort Mojave Indian Reservation;
;;gil,
a portions of Mohave County, Arizona. This transportation plan update
Gf*rpo*t
focusedonly on the Arizona ponions of the CRRTS'
The fust stepin updatingthe transportationplan was to analyzethe existing socioeconomic
and transportationconditions. Next, roadway improvementsproposedin the 1993 snrdy
were reviewed to ialentiry if enhancementsand/or changes'shouldbe nade to the original
recommendedimprovements. Based on the analysis of the future conditions, the
recommendedtransportationplan was revised. In addition, a transportationimprovement
progrrm wasdeveloped.

STTJDYPRODUCTS
The work for this study was documentsin the following working papers:
o
o
o
r

Workine Pager 1.
Sforking Paoer2.
Workine Paper3.
working Paper4.

Refined ScoPeof Work
Existine Conditions
TransoortationModel
Future Conditions and Amlvsis of Altemative Lnprovements

AGENCY COORDINATION AI\[D PIJBLIC INVOLVEMENT

o

The development of the update of the transportation plan was gUided by a Tecbnical
Advisory Committee(IAC) comprisedof individuals rqrresenting the Arizona Department
of Transportation (ADOT), Arizona Deparment of Environmental Quality (ADEO,
Bullhead city, Mohave county, and western council of Governments(WACOG). Table
I-1 lists the individuals on the TAC. Other partners in the snrdy were the Fort Mojave
Indian Tribe; clark county, Nevada; and the Nevada Departmeil of Transportation
(NDOT).

Linu & Associates

Arizptu Upibte of the CRRIS - PageI

NGIIREI. T
STTJDYAREA
N

A

Lima & Associatcs

Executive$nmuY'Page

2

TABLE I-1. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTE'E
Committee Member
JacquieJesse,Councilwoman
JaniceD. Paul, PlanningOff,tcial
MichaelP. Hentlrix, P.8., Assistant
Director
Christine Ballard, Director
Jim Zaborsky,CountYSuPervisor
Dave Barber, ExecutiveDirector
Pat Cupell, SeniorTransportation/Air
Quality Planner
Fred Garcia, SeniorTransportationPlanner
Philip B. DeNee,AnalYst
Debra Brisk, District Engineer

Agency
City Council, BullheadCity
Community DevelopmentDeparment'
Bullhead City
Public Works Deparurent, Mohave County
Planning$ /pning Deparunent,Mobave
County
Mohave County Board of Supervisors
WesternArizona Council of Governments
TransportationPlanningGroup, Arizorla
Departmentof TransPortation
EnvironmentalPl' nning, Arizona
Departmentof tra:rsPortation
Arizona Departurentof Environmental
Quality
fingman District, Arizona DePartnent of
flansportation

ln addition to the agencycoordination, severalpublic meetingswere held during the course
of the study. The fiIst public meetingwas held jointly with the Bullhead city council and
the Mohave county Board of supervisorson octotler 14, 1997. This neeting included an
overyiew of the snrdy, a review of the existing socioeconomiq and transportation
conditions,and discussedmajor transportationissues. The final public meetingwas held in
the spring of 1998 to prcsent the recommendedtranspoftation plan. One public meeting
was held with the Mohave county Transportation commission on April 14, 1998, and
another meeting was held with the Bullhead City Council on April 21, 1998' The
recommendedfarsportation plan was revisedbasedon commentsfrom the public, Mohave
County Transportatiotr Comnission, and BUmead City Council. The Bullhead City
Council acceptedthe study on May 19, 1998.

ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT

o

This report documentsthe method and results of the stldy and presentsa recomnended
-transportationplan and improvementprogram. The next chapter, ChapterII, presentsan
analysis of the current socioeconomic and transportation conditions. The future
socioeconomicand transportationconditions are then describedin Chapterltr. The fourth
chapter presents an analysis of potential alternatives. The fiml chapter presenB the
recommendedlong-rangetflulsportatiof,plan and improvementprogram.

I;inu & Associntes

ArizptuUylate of the CRRTS- Page3

tr. E)ilSTING CONDMONS
of the colorado
Bullhead city is locatedin Mohave county, Arizona on the easternshore
west
and the Black
River. The city is sinrated between the colorado River on the
The Town of
Mountains on the east, which separatesthe City from Golden Valley'
River.
Iaugblitr, Nevadais directly west Jr tne clry on the west side of the colorado
E}ilSTING SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Thecurrentpopulation,dwellingunits,andemployment.wereesdmatedtoprovideabasis
These
study area.
for understanding the socioeionomic conditions within the
for forecasting
socioeconomicestimateswill also be used to developa transportationmodel
traffic volumes.

Traflic Analysis Zones
zonalunils usedto tabulateland use and trip
-Te,zr
TrafFrcAnalysis Zones(TAZs) are geographic
are defined basedon similar land uses, physical
leneration data. Boundari", or tn
for the 1993
6"rri"rr, and major streetsin the transportaticinsystem' The TAZs developed
systemchanges'
cRRTS were modified to accommodatesocioeconomicand tra$portation
There is a total of
Figure tr-l showsthe revisedTAZ boundariesdevelopedfor this study.
TAZs are those
t6 rezs with lg3 internal TAZs and 6 external TAZs. The exrenul
to placesoutsidethe
znnesuseato representtrafrlc, which either originarcsat or is destined
s$dyarea.For-thissfirdy,extenalTAZsarelocatedonsR93'SR95'I40'andSR163'

Existing Population and Employment
jurisdictions for the study
Table tr-l $rmrnarizesthe estimated 1997 population for the
estiniatedemploymentis
area. The estimated1997sfirdy areapopulation is 57,762and the
by TAZ' The
2g,&5. Appendix e presents Oe ixl$ing populatiol-and employment
population and dle'ltng unit
sui'h"rd C'ity nu,,*n! Department prouia"d tue 1997
an0 the Cl1!-!ountf
estimatesfor rhe City.-Thc-Mohave iounty Planning Department
years
1990through 1996for the
iL66g Departrneniprovitledbuitding pennit data for the
laughlin, respectively.
portiod of f"foU* iounty in tne snrOyarea and-for the Town of
Thisdaawasusedtoexpandtheestimatedlgg0populationanddwellingunitstol99T
dwetling units data was revised
estimates. The remainderof the surdy area population and
CRRTS'
using the growth ratesfor thoseareasforecastedin the 1993

Lfuu & Associates

Ar,zorultfiate of theCnnff ' Page4

FIGI]RE II - 1
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZOIYES
N

A

See Inset Right

Lima & Associates

Arizona Updateof the CnRfS - Page5

TABLE tr-l. 1997ESTIMATED FOPI,JLATIONAND EMPLOYMENT
Jurisdiction
BullheadCity
GoldenValley and MohaveCounty Area
MohaveValley and SurroundingAreas

Population

28,494

6,503

5,093

656

10,859

r,242

Town of Iaughlii and Clark County Area

6,225

City of Needlesand SurroundingAreas

7,@l

Total

Emplolment

57,762

t9,2t0
2,034
29,&5

Employmentis dividedinto four categories:retail, office, gtineral,and casino. Eachof
thesecategoriesrepresents
a differenttrip generationrate. The BullheadCity Planning
provided
the currenttotal employmentestinratesfor the City. The Mohave
Deparment
County Pirnning Departnentprovidedthe estimatedincreaseof industrial, office, and
retail squarefootagebetween1990 and 1997 for MohaveValley and Golden Valley.
Employmentfor the City of Iaughlin was estirnatedfrom the squarefootageincrease
between1990and1997for commercial,casino,andretail usesprovidedby Clark County,
Nevada.Basedon this datethe numberof 1997.employeeswas estimatedbasedon the
squarefootageof commercial,indusfial, and offrce uses. The squarefootagewas then
convertedto numberof employees
by usrnga factor of oneemployeepcr 250 squarefeet
for commercialuses,oneemployeeper 400 squarefeet for offrceuses,andone employee
per 500 squarefeet for generaluses. The remabderof the studyareaemploymentwas
revisedusing a growth factor of three percentper year. The existing employ.ment
is
tabulatedby TAZ in AppendixA.
E}ilSTING S1TEET SYSIEM
The studyareastreetnetworkis comprisedof an inJerstate
highway,sratehigbways,urban
andrural arterials,andurbanandrural collectors: ArizonaSate Route95 traversesnorthsouthtbrougbthe entirestudyarea,and SR 68 traverseseast-westthroughthe snrdyarea
connectingthe Bullhead/kughlin area to US 93 and GoldenValley. . BoundaryCone
(Oatman)Roadto the southis a connectorbetweenMohaveValley andGoldenValley. On
thc northwestsideof the studyarea,NevadaSR 163providesaccessfrom the westinto the
region. IDterstate40 providesaccessto the southernportion of the study area from
CalifomiaandArizona.
Four existingbridgescrossthe ColoradoRiver in the saxly area. OnebridgeconnectsSR
95 in BullheadCity to CasinoDrive in Laughlin. This bridgewill be incorporatedinto the
ArizonaSatehigbwai systemin the nearfuture. Anotherbridgecrossesthe DavisDamto
the north and comectsArizonaSR 68 to NevadaSR 163junction. A bridsr on Harbor
Lina & Associales

Arimm Uplateof theC&itZS- Page6

antl lirizona in the souttrernponion of
Streetin Needlesallows .accessbetweenCalifomia
the Aha Machv of the Fort Mojave lndian
the study area. Another u.iai" to*tto
portion of the lndian Reservation.
Reservationin the california poiioo ro the Arizona
Thefollowingcharacteristicswereinventoriedforthestreetsystem:1)functional
'
classification;-2)numberof lanes;and 3) speedlimits

Functional Classification
R o a d s a r e c l a s s i f i e d t o d e f i n e t h e t y p e s o f r o a d s . t h a t h a v e s i m i l a they
r d e sperform
ignandtraffrc
roadsby the function
characteristics.rne runctionaJclassificationcategorizes
provides
-withA:principal arterial, for example,
in regard to providing .""... uoo mobility.
-inim"t accessto adjoining properties' A
mobiliry to drivers u.w""o toog distances
to homes rather than serving long
collector street, on the other iand, provides access
*J -i.r characteristicsof the snrdy area, each-functional
distances. Due to the
"ru*
rural category. Figure [t-2.shows the
classificationis further suuoiviiJ i o the urban and
the
to the streer network in the study. ln addidon-to
functional classification
"rrigoJ tbe Figure, there.is a federal functional classification
functional classification sho;;-;
eligible for
- slte andiegionally significant roads which are
systemwhich is usedto ioentiry
is a distinction betweetrlocal
federal transportationrunAs. ii is importantlo,note thatjhere
For example, a local roaf which is
functional classifications*o tn r.ao"r chssification.
designatedaminorarterialisnotnecessarilyclassifiedasaminorarterialonthefederal
fn" federai systemclassifiesroads on a broader regional
functional classification,yr*-.
and satewide geograPhicalscoPe'
AprincipalarterialservesthemajorcenlersofPti".y'carriesthehighestraffrcvolume,
the major portion ofrrips entering
and servesthe longesttrips. e pi"-rp.r arterial carries
ttp
as the najoritf of through movemetrtsbypassing
and leaving the urban
"r""r, "t'*.U
o. partially controlled access. ln the
ceDtralarea. principat arrerias uzually have irtty
sudy area, SR 95 is classifiedas a principal arterial'
MinorarterialsintercoDtrectwiththeurbanprincipalarterials,providey-lvicefortripsof
collector streets. Minor arterials are
moderatelength, and oistriuute veniclesto tle urban
the suburban
i, ,t" *r"a busincssdistrict to 2 3 miles in
usually spaced ttg - ln-i"
fringes.lnthesnrdy"'"",-rr-.o"rno"o,MariDaBoulevard'silverCreekRoad,within
Bullheadcitylimits,anacasinoDriveinhugblinareclassifiedasurbanminorarterials'
and shinarunp Road are examples
while Boundaryconeloaman-RoaO, Needlesiigt*"y,
of rural minor arterials.

Linu & Associates

Wapaon

7
of the 9RRTS-Page

FIGTJREII - 2
FTJNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
,----t--------'
lif,
i:E

N

iiu

A

tl

l a-r-i
I - - +- +rt l !
tl
-I---J----

FunctionalClassification
tll
rll

F---,
tl

I

!t!!
i---r-.-^-'--t---1
!' rl r' ;.l i J

\ j.ri'd
d

,
t

j
t

I

|

----------lEgg.---

i'---l----

\\

t\
I

|
.'

A/
/1
,\t
/1t

Rural Minor Arterial
I

____erplrunre

Rural Collector
Urban Major Arterial
Urban Minor Arterial

---Tr'------H.Bffi
a
I
I
I

>.t-

&\
a!

I
I
I

ail

,

t--

,r'-''.......,rtt

I
I
I
I

Ei
g,

>t

-----.

F'*

/v

lv
t

Lima & Associates

Rural Major Arterial

/v

.l

lAv

lv

Urban Collector
Parkway
Interstate
Traffic Interchanges

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- PageI

and direct
collector streets provide traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods
to the
accessto adjacentproperty. The collector systemdisUibutestrips from the arterials
in both the
local strees. The majority of the study area roadwaysfall under this category
rural and urban areas.

Number Of Lanes
lanes
The number of lanesfor various roadway facilities in the study alea vary flom two
undivided to four lanes divided. Data for the number of lanes of streetsin the network
system were collected by driving on all of the arterial and collector streets. Maps
displaying the observednumber of lanes were reviewed by Bullhead city and Mohave
County pirsonnel. The streetcross sectionsinclude the following lane configurations:
.
.
.
.
.

Two knes With a Conthuous kft-Tum kne
Two l,anesUndivided
Four I:nes Undivided
Four l,anesWith a Continuousl,eft-Turn lane
Four lanes Divided

Most collectors and minor arterial streets in. tbe sU.rdyarea axe two-lane facilities while
most major arterials including SR 95, SR 68, and the Bullhead Parkway are four-lane
facilities. However, SR 95, from Valencia Road to the Town of Needles is a two-lane
facility. The number of lanes for the arterid and collector streets in the study area are
shown in Figure tr-3.

SpeedLimits
The postedspeedlimits are shown on Figure tr4. Speedlimits generally rangebetneen 25
and 45 mph in the urban €nvironme and between 45 and 55 nph in the rural
environment. Bullheadparkway has a postedspeedlimit of 50 mph, while I40 hes posted
speedlimia between65 ad 75 nPh.

Unpaved Roads
For air quality analysispurPoses,an estimateof unpavedroad mileage was compiled for
Bullhead City and the portion of Moiave County inside the Bullhead City PMr.
tronattainmentarea. Bullhead clty has approximately10 miles of unpavedroads primarily
concentratedbetweenBlack Mountain Road and Mohave Drive west of SR 95. Mohave
Valley has approximately60 miles of unpavedroadsinside the nonattainmentarea'

o
Lbrn & Associates

Arizona afiate of the CRnfS - Page9

FIGURE II - 3
NUMBER OF LANES
N

A

Number of Lanes

/v
'f"v'/

Lima & Associates

2 Through Lanes
2 Through Lanes with Continuous Turn Lane

/\\/

4 Through Lanes

N/

4 Through Lanes with Continuous Turn Lane

Arizona Updateof the CRR?IS- Poge 10

FIGURE II . 4
SPEEDLIMITS
N

A

v')
c\

I

&

-F

-E

T
E
SpeedLimit

/v

25 MPH

,'tu,.r/

35 MPH

lv

40 MPH

/v

/v

A/

45 MPH
50 MPH
55 MPH

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- Page 1I

o

o

DilSTING TRATTIC CONDITIONS
Traf|rcconditionswereinventoriedforthestreetsinthestudyareaincluding:1)current
service'
traffrc, 2) roadwaycapacity' and 3) level of
;;**.;*t

Ttaffic Vol,,mes
in-Figure tr-5' Trafirc volumesin this
The Current AverageDaily Traffrc (ADT) is shown
and
pti"iA"A tV glrilh*o C-iw' Mott"u" County' ADOT'
figure are basedon traffic
and Mohave countv
""*u
iNoorl' . The.Bulihead ciry
Nevada Department rtt;;;;;
"f
and early 199?' Both ADOT and NDOT
collected current traffrc totff" io late 1996
traffic
raff'" nolom"s' which were adjustedto 1997
provided previously
"oil."J"tG
volumes.
percentaqesof Average Annual Daily
Table tr-2 presents inforrnation on the monthly
trafft recorJer (ATR) located-9i ll 68'
Traffic (AADT) tor a permanent automatic
City ' Information collectedby the 1993CRRTS
aDproxisntely five miles
"",Jgoilh'"A
on-vehicle mix is shownin Table tr-3'

TABLE II-2. MONTHLY PERCENTAGESOF AADT
SR 6EEAST OF BI'JLLIIEAD CITY
Month

Pertentage of AADT

Ianrrary

95.0

February

103.4

March

107.5.

April

r09.2

May

102.0

Jrme

101.0

July

98.9

August

97.s

September

98.3
100.2

October

Lfuu & Associates

November

94.9

December

91.7

ffi

- Page72
apd"t, ofthe ORRTS

FIGIJRE II - 5
CI]RRENT AYERAGB DAILY TRAFFIC

%q,
.

N

9.rl

h

SEEINSET

1000 AverageDaily Traffic (vpd)

r----------

I

ll
ll
ll

Fooo\gHancock

e
IK
K

Marine
_
10200

o

DOWNTOWN BT]LLIIEAD CITY

Lima & Associntes

Arizona Updateof the CRR?IS- Page13

TABLE II.3. VEHICIJ MIX
Location
Vehicle Type

sR 68

sR 95

sR 163

Needles
HighwaY

Car
Passenger

@%

52%

60Vo

64%

Pick up Truck

29%

42%

29%

27%

Light Truck

r%

37o

lVo

r%

Heavy Truck

2%

2%

6%

4%

3 -/o

r%

t -/o

3%

l%

r%

Recreational
Vehicle
CycleiOther

r%

ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE
arterial
Levels of service (Los) of the streetsin the study area were estimatedusing the
:naly5i5 in the 1994 Highway capacity Manual. Arterial LOS is basedon the average
the
through-vehicletravel speedover the length of the arterial. It is important to note that
LOS ;f individual intersectiotrscould vary from the arterial LOS. An intersection LOS
where
could govem the overall arterial Los. Levels of service range from LOS A to F,
LOS ; representsAee flow and LOS F representsforc€d traffrc flow. For traffrc
forecastingmodeling purposes,capacity of a roadway segmentis typical{ fefined. as the
ADT that-rezultsin a Los E operation. LoS E is characterizodby large delays and travel
that are one-third of the speedsat LOS A.
spee<ts
.2.0, was used to perform a planning
The Highway capacity software (HCS), version
analysisof the arterial street sectionsto determinetheii capacitiesin terms of maximun
ADT that can be accomnodatedby the roadway segmed. The directiooal daily lane
capacityby roadway functional classification,Aswell as the speed,is shown in Table tr-4.
The arterial level of service was estimatedis a function of volume-to-capacity(v/c) ratios.
The LOS ranges,basedon v/c ratios, were developedusing the HCS Software 2.0. with
the samei4ut variablesemployedin the capacitydevelopment. LOS rangesbasedon the
v/c ratio for rural facilities and urban facilities are tabulatedin Table II-5. The present
LOS operationfor eachlhk with ADT volurres was determinedbasedon v/c ratios and is
shown in FigUre tr-6. These ratio values will be comparedwith v/c ratios resulting from
the alternative street networks modeled larcr in the study and used to determine the
effectivenessof eachalternative.

Lima & Associates

Arizotu Ilylare of the CRRTS- Pagc14

TABLE tr{.

DAILY ROADWAY

.CITN,CTITPS

speed
(mph)

Functionalcrassificai'
uon

DirectionalDaily
LaneCapacity11,500

Rural Major Arterial

))

Rural Major Arterial
(2Jane SR 68 in mountainousterrain)

f,)

4,800

Rural Minor Arterial

45

8,750

Rural Collector

45

7,750

Urban Major Arterial

3545

10,800

Urban Minor Arterial

35

8,400

25-3-\

7,750

Parkway

5A

l0,oo0

Interstate

65

15,250

Ramps

25

8,000

Urban Collector

TABLE tr.s. LEVELS OF SERVI@
LOS

lirru& Assocides

Rual
MaximumV/C

Urban
Maximum V/C.

A

0.15

0.30

B

o.27

0.50

c

0.43

0.70

D

o.&

0.90

E

1.00

1.00

F

> 1.00

> 1.00

Arizotu Updateof thc CRI?S - Page15

FIGT]RE IT - 6
CIJRRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
N

A

ut
L

E

a

$
€
4

C

Lima & Associates

Cilrplvlctra't

LOS

Rural
Maximum V/C

Urban
Maximum V/C

A

0.15

0.30

B

0.27

0.50

c

0.43

0.70

D

0.64

0.90

E

1.00

1.00

F

> 1.00

> 1.00

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- Page16

III. FUTURE CONDMONS
This sectionof the report presentsthe analysisof future socioeconomicand transportation
conditions. The next section discussesthe future socioeconomicconditions including the
estimateof the population and employmentfor the years 2c02, 2007, and 2017. The third
section presentsfuture street conditions for the existing street systemplus the five-year
committie improvement. The final section presentsthe analysis of altemative roadway
imorovements.

FUTURE SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The future population, dwelling units, and employmentwere estimatedto provide a basis
for understandingthe future socioeconomicconditions within the study area. These
estimates*"r" *id to project future trafftc volumesin order to analyzethe performanceof
the streetsystemunder estimatedfuture socioeconomicconditions.

Future Population and EmPloYment

o

Lirna & Associates coordinated with the following organizations in developing the
data:
socioeconomic
.

BullheadCity PlanningDepartment

.

MobaveCounty PlanningDeparmeil

.

Clark County Phnning Deparment for the Town of l-aughlin

.

Hollock and Grossfor the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation

The remainder of the srrdy area population and dwelling units data were revised using
growth ratesfor thoseareasforecastediD the f 993 CRRTS.
The estimatedfunrre population and employmentfor the jurisdictions for the study area are
summarized in Tables ltr-l and m-2. For the yeat 20t7, the estimated snrdy area
population is approximately 182,4tD persons and the estimated employment is
approximately 82,000 employees. Employment is divided info four categories: retail,
office, general, and casino. Each of thesecategoriesrepresentsa different trip generation
rate. Tables B-1, B-2, and B-3 present the population and eryloyment by TAZ for the
years2002,2007,and2017, respectively.

Litttt & Associates

Arimnt Aybte of the CRRTS- Page17

TABLE III-1. ESTIMATED POPI,JLATION
Population

Jurisdiction

tw7
28,494

BullheadCity

20/D7
32,737 38,234

2017
50,473

7,045

8,984

6,065

Golden Valley and Mohave County Area

5,093

Mohave Valley and SurroundingAreas

8,658

10,808 12,968 r7,255

Town of l-aughlin and Clark CouDtyArea

6,198

11,836 17,709 29,452

City of Needlesand SurroundingAreas

5,119

FMIT

4,2N

5,893

6,665

19,965 35,98r

8,208
68,007:

57,762 87,3040 118,602 r82,379

Total Studv Area

Source: BullbeadCity, MohaveCounty, Hollock ald Gross

TABLEIII-2.ES1-IIaA-TEDEMPLOYMENT

Employment

Jurisdiction

rwl
BullheadCity
Golden Valley and Mohave County Area
Mohave Valley and SurroundingAreas

Town of laughlin andClark CountyArea

2W2
7,797

9,088

1r,674

656

1,156

1,660

2,69s

1,114

1,705

2,286

3,482

26,282

33'999

2,669

3,598

18,595

22,46

1,7.34

2,2W

Fort Mojave rndian Reserration

1,013

7,375

Linu & Associlites

2017

6,503

City of Needlesand SurroundingAreas

Total Study Area

2W7

29,95

4,679

13,706 26,516
55,691 81,964

- PageIE
Ariaom Uplate of fte CRJRIIS

TUTURE TRATTIC COI\'DITIONS
for the estimatedfuture socioeconomic
The performanceof tbe street systemwas -4*9
future traffic was projected
conditionspresentedin tlre previous section. For this analysis,
plus committed street oetwork'
i", ,n" v"i* 2ffi2, 2oo7: and 2ol7 on the existing
Committedfacilitiesarethosestateatrdlocalimprovementstbatarecurrentlyinadopted
The level of servicewas then estimatedfor sueetsin the existing
;;;;;;;"grams.
and committedsEeetneMork.
Travel Demand Modeling
Thetraveldemandmodelpreviouslydevelopedforthelgg3cRRTswasupdatedforthis
'*ol._rti'"paatedmodelincludesanupdateofcurrentstreetandhighwaynetworkand
ofthecurrentsocioeconomicconditions.Thetraveldemandmodelwasthenrevalidated
Models' documents
traffic conditiors. Working Paper 3' Transportation
i* *r.*,
developmentand validation of the travel demandmodel'
EXISTING AND COMMITTED NETWORK
programmed AnOf
1O
Table Itr-3 presentsthe transportationimProvemenqgurrently
!f
of
Transportation
-Zg612
Deparment
Nevada
period.
The
lisl
f"fofr"u" County over tle
not bave any
ano the catifornla Department of Transportation.(calTrans) do
olnorl
and committed network
commiueaprojerts other fhan ro-utinemaintenance. The existing
for the year 2002 is shownin Figure ltr-l '
progress:
In addition to the committedprojects, the following shrdiesare in
rDesignCorrceptsnrdytowidentheexistingtwo-lanesegmentsofSR63to4larcs
tfuough the mouoain
o DesU! ConceptStudy to widen the existing twolane SR 95 from Courtwright Road
to NeedlesBridge
oAfeasibilitystudytorelocatesRg5baweenCourtwrightRoadan$I40'bypassing
the NeedlesBridge and the City of Needles

Littu & Associates

oJtheCRRTS-Page19
ArizonaUpdate

TABLE M.3. COMMITTED STREETAND HIGIIWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Lry7 -2002
ImprovementLocation

Description

Bstinated
Cost

SR 95 - Courtwrightto CentralAvenue

Rigbt-of-wayAcquisition

al Avenue
SR95 - Coumwigbt to Centr.

Widento 4 latres

SR 95 - Hulet - Lipan

DesignRoadway

n4,aoo

Year

FY 98

SR 95 - North ReservationBoundarvMarinaBoulevard
SR 9,r - ValenciaRoad- Marina
Boulevard

Righr-of-wayAcquisitiou

SR 95 and 7' Street

InstaI Traffic Sienal
City of Bullhead

Roadto lakeside
Marina Boulevard-Trane
Dive

35s

Constuct Roadway
Subtotal

FY 98/99

$51s

F':G

l:-r

.t

ad - SR 68 to ShinarumpDrive

Grade,Drain & BaseCourse

$350

FY 97198

ShinarumoDrive - Eastof Aztec

Grade,Drain & Base

$350

F\'97198

ShinarunpDrive - Aztcc Roado
ColoradoRoad

Grade& Base

$120 Ft nt98

VandersliceRoad- Southof l,aguna

Gradeald Pave

$2s0 FY 97198

MohaveValley - SR 95

Install Trafhc Signals

AZL:.

Total Cost

Lirrn & Associates

$50

F{ nt98

]66,246

Arizpna Updateof the CRnfS - Page20

FIGURE III - 1
EXISTING AI\[D COMMITTED
NETWORK
N

A

Legend

Lima & Associates

A/

Two Lanes

A/

Four Lanes

Arizona Update of the CRRTS- Page 2l

ROADWAY CAPACITY'DEFTCIENCIES
for rhe years 2C/Jl2'2007' and 2017 are
The future averagedaily traffic volumes LOS
for the existing and committedsteet and
shownin FiguresIII-2 ,nt""gn m+, i"'pectfully'
was estimatedusing the samemethddologydescribed
trvel
;;;;;#;;;k.
"i;;t*or ibs indicate that the following roadway segEentswill
in cbapter tr. The
"o"ryrooperat€at LOS D or worse:
o Exis-ing two-lane segmentsof SR 68 through the mounain
r

SR95

.

I-aughlin Bridge

e NeedlesHighwaY
r

Existing twolane VeteransMemorial Highway

Bullhead city and the projected
Due to the increasein future traffic on sR 95 througb
traffrcgrowthinthecity,o.h",",,ofSRg5,thereisaneedtorelievetrafficonSR95.
in handling local
be accompliihedttrougtr better use of the Bullhead Parkway
fni,
".:,rfa
connectionsbetween the parkway and sR 95 are
For this, additional
traffic.
"rrt]*..t
required,aswellasmorenofth-southconnectionsintheareabetweentheparkwayandSR
g5. Becauseof the irrcreasedtrafhc load, relief is also neededon the laughlin Bridge'
Reservation areas will
The urbanization of Mohave valley and Fort Mojave Indian
or tt"m" on SR 95, the only contintrousnorth-south
contribute to a sigrificant i*r"*"
valley, there is a needfor
road in the area. As a result of the increasedtraf[rc in Mohave
nortb-southroadwaysparallelto SR 95'
casino, resort related
The combined growth of the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation
urban noderesulting
activities, atrdthe accompanyingresidentialgrowtn w l createanother
City development' This
in developmentsimilar to tn"t if tn" existing l-aughlin/Bullhead
gto*tl *iff increasethe interactionof activities on both sidesof the River'
area.and the Bullhead
The anticipatedtraffic gowth betweenthe Kingoan/Gol<lenvalley
speedson the twolane
Cityn-augilin areawilfcontribute to increasedcongestionand slow
the mountains. A need
,riioo oi sR 6g, and will restrict passing opporurnitiesthfough
exiss to upgradethe existing two-lane segmentson SR 68 to four lanes'

Lirrro& Associates

ArizotuUptlate of the CRRTS- Page22

FIGTJREIII - 2
2OO2LEYEL OF SERYICE
E)ilSTING AhID COMMITTBD IYETWORK
N

A

Irvel of Service
/

A/

Lima & Associates

A-C
D or Worse

Arizona Updateof the CnRfS - Page23

FIGT,]REIII . 3
2OO7
LEYEL OF SERYICE
EXISTING AI{D COMMITTED NETWORK
N

A

I-evel of Service

Lima & Associates

/v

A-C

A/

D or Worse

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- Page24

FIGURE rfr - 4
2OI7LEVBL OF SERVICE
DilSTING AT{D COMMITTED NETWORK

N

A

kvel of Service

/V
A/

lSdr&rE

A-C
D or Worse

Rrl

Lima & Associates

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS_ fage iS

TV. TRAFTIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATTVE ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS
lrvel of servicewas analyzedfor alternativeroadway improvements.
improvementsanzlyzedincludedthe following:

The generalqpe of

o Widen the two-larresegmentsof SR 68 and SR 95
.

RelocateSR95

r

Constructan aatditionalColoradoRiver crossing

oCompletethestreetsasrecornmendedintheBullheadcitychculationElement
.coDstructanexterxionofVeteransMemorialParkwayontheFortMojavelndian
Reservation
rlmprovemajorintersections,suchasthesRgs/LaughlinBridgeintersection.

o

be further
The Technical Advisory committee (TAC) identified specific improvementsto
:ng and comrritted network and a review of the
analyzed,basedon Oe LOS analysisof exis
pr""i*tfy recommendedand proposedprojects. Long-rangeimprovementprojects' wtrich
identifiedthe 1993 CRRTS, are shown in Table.IV-I. The Coloradobridge crossings'
proposedin the 1993CRRTS, were studiedin detail by clark county' Nevada.The results
I'
of ois snray are presentedin Final Report: Lauqhlin Bridqe Location studv, March
1996.

ALTERNATIVE IMPROVEMENTS
are shown in Table IV-2. A
The poteftial
-futurc improvementsidentified for furrher analysis
network, Altemative l, was developedto representa street Detwork which
base
ihe
include improvementsthat appearto have a high probability of being implementedovei
next 20 years. Alternatives2 tbrougb 10 were then analyzedas separateoptionsto the base
fu$re network.

Lima & Associates

Arizona Updateofthe CRRTS- Page26

TABLE TV.l, STIMMARY OF 1993 CRRTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Improvement

Constructthe Rio RanchoExpresswayfrom NeedlesHighway to BullheadParkway. Include
traffrc interchangesat CasinoDrive and SR 95 and a new six-lanebridge over the Colorado
River @assCanyonlocation).

Consmrctthe BullheadParkway exteDsionbetweenAha Macav Parkway and
including a four-laneColoradoRiver bridge.

ConstructLandon Drive betweenSR 68 and BullheadParkway as a four-lane arterial street.

Pavea network of two lane arterial roadwaysin Golden Valley includilg Colorado,
Tombstone,Estrella and ShinarunP.

Widen SR 95 to four lanesfrom Valencia Road to the NeedlesBridge.

Coosttu"t the J Streetcorridor in Needlesas a four-lane arterial streetbetweetrthe Needles

Linu & Associates

Arimru Uptuteof theCRRrS- Page27

o

TABLE TV-2. STREETAND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
IDENTIFIED FOR ANALYS$
Alter:rativeI
BaseFuture'
Network

POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT

oneof thefollowinglocations:
t"* bttdg"
"t
"."*ittg
"
SilverCreekRoad

6ffi

HancockRoad
RiverviewDrive
Extensionof Bullhead
Wid"" th. h."rt""/North

to Aha Macav

Alternative
Improvement

Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alernative 4
Altemative 5

Oatnan corridor roadwayto four

Fon Mojave Indian Resenation/County Improvements

ConstruCtIvtountainView Roadas a fourlane arterial with a two-

Consruct Ashley Road as a four-lane artedal street

Wia.o Sn SSto four lanesfrom CourtwrightRoadto theNeedles

ir"tign St eSfrom northof CourtwrightRoadTo I40

Widen NeedlesHighway/River Road to four lanes.

Lima & Assocfutes

Arizprn(Ipfute of the CRRTS- Page28

BaseFuture Network
T]rte2c/f,7,2017LOS, and daily traffic volumes for the basefuture network are illustrated
in Figures tV-l and IV-2, respectively. The. improvementsin the base future network
include the following:
o
o
r
r

completion of the stree$ in the Bullhead circulation Element, shown in Table Itr-3
Widening of SR 95 to four latres
Widening of SR 68 to four lanestlrough the mountain
ffidsning of Mountain View Road as a continuousfour-lane arterial

The completion of the streets in the Bullhead circulation Element will reduce traffic
volumes on SR 95 in the City of Bullhead. ln additiou, the implementation of the
Circulation Element will signifrcantly improve internal circulation and distribute more
traffic to the BullheadParkway; however, the l,aughlin Bridge would still have sigrificant
traffic volgmes. The widening of the VandersliceMountain View corridor will also reduce
11afficvolumes on SR 95 in Mohave Valley and better distribute traffic volumes in the
area. The widening of sR 68 to four lanes will significantly improve the LOS in the
sectionthrough the mountain
New Bridge Crossings
were analyzed. Figures IV-3 through rv-6
Fou potenrial colorado River bridge
"1sgsings
ittustrate the 2017 LOS and daily traffic volumes Orat u/ilI occur if the potential bridge
crossings at Silver Creek Road, Hancock Road, and Riverview Drive are in place. All
improve the Los on portiols of sR 95 h the city of Bullhead.
oree uridge
Silver Creek crossingincreasesthe traffic volunes on SR 95' south of Silver
However, the"rss5ings
creek Road, by approximately 10,000 vehiclesper day, but all three crossingsreduce the
traffic volume on tne.IaugHin nriOge. Among the three crossings' the Silver Creek
crossing reducesthe geatest amouot of traffic on the Laughlin Bridge by approximately
32,000 vehiclesper day. Tbe Silver Creek crossingalso increasestraffic volume on Silver
creek Road by approximately 9,000 vehicles per day. The Hancock Bridge crossing
iqroves tUe ievii of service of SR 95 more than the other two altemative bridge
crossings;however, it increasestraffic volume on Hancock Road by approximately' 13'000
vehiclesper day.
Another altenntive bridge crossing snrdied was a potentid bridge from an east-west
extensionof tbe Bullhead Parh*ray to the River and connectingto Aha Macav Parkway.
This bridge would carry approximately 10,800 vehiclesPer day'

Littu & Associates

tuizpna Updde of the CnXfS - Pagc29

N

A

FIGIJREIV. 1
2OO7
LEVEL OF SERVICE
ALTERNATIVE I.
BASE FIJTIJRENETWORK

Irvel of Service

/v A-c
A/

Lima & Associates

D or Worse

Arizona Updateof the CRRIS - Page30

N

FIGIIRE N - 2
24fi LEVEL OF SERVICE
ALTERNATIVB 1
BASE FUTI]RE IVETWORK

A

Irvel of Service

/V
A/

Lima & Associates

A-C
D or Worse

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- Page31

FIGURETV.3
2017LEVEL OF SER}'ICE
ALTERNATTVE2 . SILVER CREEK BRIDGE
N

A

Level of Service

A/ ^-c
/V

DorWorse
*izooo APiIateof he CRRIS - Page32

FIGI]RETV.4
2OL7LEYE,L OE SERVICE
ALTERNATIVE 3 - HANCOCK BRIDGE
N

A

E

s
R
_€

kvel of Service

A/
N

A-C
Por$y'orse

Linu & Associates

,Crirpr- Agfuu of fte CRRTS' Page33

FIGI]RE TV. 5
2017LEVEL OF SERVICE
BRIDGE
ALTERNATryE 4. RIVERYIEW/N' OATMAN
N

L

Level of Service

A-c

N
linu & Aslp,cialcs

D or Worse
lrtp""

Upatu

"the

34
CRRTS'Page

TIGURE TV - 6
2OI7LEVEL OF SERVICE
ALTERNATTYE 5 - BI]LLHEAD PARIilryAY BRIDGE
N

A

B.

s

Levelof Service
A-C

Al
Litru & Asnciatcs

D or Worse

AfipnoUplate of the CTRTS-Page35

Extension of B 'llhead Parkway/Veterans Memorial Parkway
to the
Alternative 6, illustrated in Figure IV-7, is an extensionof the Bullhead Parkway
reduces
west and south to veterans Memorial Parkway. The extension of the Parkway
trafficonsRg5southoftheParkwaybyapproximatelyT,000vehiclesperday.The
imFact section 10 owned by
extensionof the Parkway south to vetersns Parkway would
park and a
the Bureau of Ilnd Management@LM). This area is designatedas a
the
conservationarea. BLM has cooperativeagreemeffswith wildlife agenciesto conserve
areafor wildlife protection. The extensioncould also impactthe Fort Mojave site'

Relocation of NeedlesllighwaY
major improvementof the
Figure IV-8 illustratesAlternative 7, which is a relocation and
connect
Niates Hignway to parallel SR 95 on the west side of the Colorado River and
sR
direcrly to ,Ir, vt"".u-. The improvementof NeedlesHigbway did not reducetraffic on
95.
Relocation of SR 95 Betweenthe Bullhead Parkway and I40
g5
Altemative 8, shown in Figure IV-9, is a proposedmajor relocation of SR betweenthe
Bullhead Parkway and I-40 and ties into SR 95 from the south of I-40. The analysis
indicatestbat the relocatedSR 95 diverts a small tmount of trgffic from existing SR 95.

Relocation of SR 95 to I-40
This alremative,itlustrated in Figure IV-10, is a relocation of SR 95 north of Coumwight
Road and presentsa direct connectionwith I40 northwest of the City of Needles. This
alternative would divert a significant amount of trafFlc frorn the existing SR 95 south of
Courtwright Roadand from the NeedlesBridge and NeedlesCity streets.
Mountain View Road/Ashley Road Corridor

o

Mohave County is consideri4gthe designationof a future four-lane road'in the Mountain
View Road:/AshleyRoad corridor. Asbley Road is currently a north-south undeveloped
alignment located three miles !o tbe east of SR 95. The base future network included
Uountain View Road as a four lane arterial. Alternatives 10 through 12 include alternative
lane configurations for Mountain view Road, vanderslice Road, and Asbley Road.
Altemative 12 includes the improvement of Ashley Road as a high speedlimited access
arterial. Table tV-3 presents a comparison of .traffic volumes for the alternative lane
configurations. The trafhc volumes present€din the Able indicate that Mountain View
Roatlcarries a significant anouot of traffic in all the potential scenarios. This significance

Lim & Associaes

Ariztna Upilde of the CRRTS- Page36

to SR 95 and
of Mountain View Road as a north-southarterial is due to road's proximity
the distribution of projectedland use in the SR 95/Ashley RoadCorridor'.

OTIMR POTENTIAL IMPROVEMEN-TS
Another project, under considerationby ADOT, is the improvementof the sR 95/laughlin
Uriag. iot"ts."tion, including exclusivesouthboundright-turn lanesand additional sig;ning'
This project would improve the htersection level of service'
under
The Sierra Club recently proposed an additional alternative to those currently
traverse
considerationfor the Hoover bam Bypass. This additional altemative would
connect to
Arizona 68 to Arizona 95 in Bullhead City, cross the Colorado River, and
existing
the
or
Nevada95. The Colorado River crossing wbuld be on either new bridge
when this
bridge which would be widened. since the CRRTS update was being frnalized
Dam
alteiative was proposed, the update did not analyze the impacts of the Hoover
the
in
River
Bypass. Howlver, an alternative bypass crossing the colorado
in
nuiUeaOn-augltin area would impact traffic in tle area. If the alternative is included
'
alternative
the Environmentallmpact Surdy ior the bypass, a detail traffic analysis of the
must be conducted.

Littu & Assocides

ArimwUPlate of the CRRTS- Page37

FIGIJREW. T
OF SERVICE
?.OLTLEVB;L
PARKWAY
ALTERNATIVE 6 : EXTE,ITIDED
N

A

kvel of Service

A/
lV
linu & Associms

A-C
DorWorse
kizpraApdate oltlu CRRTS' Page 38

IIGURE TV - 8
M''LEVE,L OFSERVICE
ALTERNATIVE ?. RELOCAIED NEEDLES HIGHWAY
N

A

Level of Service

A/

A.C

A/

D or worse

Iima & Associaus

AdzpnUylate of he CRRTS'Page39

N

FIGIJRE fV - 9
2OL7LEVEL OF SERYICE
ALTERNATIVE 8
SR 95 BYPASS

A

Irvel of Service

Lima & Associates

/v

A-C

A/

D or Worse

Arizona Updateof the CRRUIS- page 40

FIGI]RE IV. 10
2OI7LE\ry'L OF SERVICE
ALTERNATIVE 9 - SR 95 BRIDGE BYPASS
N

A

l-evel of Service

A-C

lv
Linu & Associatos

D or Worse
Arizpna Apfue of the CRRTS' Page41

TABLE
_ -TID W.3. COMPARISONOF TRAFITICVOLIMES'FOR
MOI'NTAIN VIEW/ASHLEY ROAD CORRJDOR

Alternative
Altemative 10
sR 95
MountainView Road
VandersliceRoad
Alternative 11

sR95
Mountain View Road
VandersliceRoad

Alternative 12
sR 95
MountainViewRoad
VandersliceRoad
Arhl"., Road*

2017DailYTraffic Volume!
-Camp
Mohave BoundaryCone
Numberof
to King
to Rodeo
Lanes
4
4
2

37,800
9,300
6,W

30,900
16,200
8,800

4
2
4

37,800
8,900
7,3W

31,100
14,000
10,700

4
2
2
4

38,500
5'900
l'200
8'200

27',50o
15'000
7 '600
7'800

*assumes
asa high speedlimiredaccess:uterid
improvement

Li,nu & Associatcs

lrt'rpru ttPdde of the CBRTS- Page42

SIJMMARY OF IHE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVEMENTS
the following:
Major frndingsof the analysisof potentialimprovementsinclude
.AnewbridgebetweenBrrllheadCityandtheTownofl.aughlinwould.improvethe
Bridge'
level of serviceon sR 95 and reducetraffic on the existing Laugblin
.

tbat traffic
The closer that a new bridge is to the existing Laughlin Bridge, the more
would be reducedon the existing bridge'
Neweast-westandnorth-southstreetsbetweensR95andtheBullheadParkway,as
Pro$am' will
identified in tbe BullheadCity GeneralPlan and Capital lmprovement
and reduce
distribute traffic more uniformly betweensR 95 and Bullhead Parkway
traffic on SR 95.
View Road'
Constructionof arterial roadwaysparallel to SR 95, such as Mountain
VandersliceRoad,andveteransParkway,significantlyreducestrafrlconSR95and
will providebetterlocal traffic circulation.
The paving of selectedroads in Golden Valley will improve the continuity of
roadwaysand improve the internal traffrc circulation'
paving existing unpaved roads, located in the Bullhead city Particulate @Mto)
nonattainmentarea,will reducevehicle particulateemissioqs'
ffis $/idsning of SR 68 to four lanes through the mountain pass will significantly
improve the LOS and increaseoperatingspeedson SR 68'
The completion of the programmedyyidsningof sR 95 will improve the Los and
increaseoperatingspeedson SR 95'
f!6 sidsning of SR 95 betweenCourtwright Road and NeedlesBridge will improve
the level of iervice and increaseoperating speedson SR 95 south of Courtwright
Road.
A direct connectiouof sR 95 to I40 would reducetraffic delay througb the city of
Needlesand improve the connectionfrom other areasof Arizona and califomia to
the Bullhead/Iaughlin area.

Lima & Alsociates

Adzona Uplate of the CRRTS- Page43

V. TRANSPORTATIONPLAN INN NVPIBWWTATION
PROGRAM
This chapterpBsentsthe recommendedlong-rangeplan for BullheadCity, Mohave Valley,
and Golden Valley. A TraDsportationImprovementProgram (IIP) is also presentedalong
with cost estimatesand the agenciesresponsiblefor implementingthe improvements'

RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION PLAN
ed 2Ol7 long-rangetransportationplan is shown in Figure V-1. Major new
The recommend
facilities are shown in Figure V-2. Tnle 2017 long-range plan includes the following
improvements:
.

Completewidening SR 95 from NeedlesBridge to Central Avenue

r

Widen SR 68 to four lanesthrough the mountaiDpass.

.

Construct city collector and arterial streetsin the Bullhead City General Plan and
Capital lmprovementProgram.

o Constructa new Colorado River crossingbetweenBullhead City and the viciniry of
the Town of hugblin.
.

Construct Mountain View Road and Vanderslice Road as continuous two-lane
arterials betweenCouronight Road and the Bullhead Parku'ay'

o Consmrct a four-lane road along an existing alignment in the Mountain View
Road/VandersliceRoad/Asbley Road corridor. MohaVe County should designate
either Mountain View Road, VandersliceRoad, or Ashley Road as a future fourlane arterial. This designation would include a roadway cross-section,adequate
mrnegemeDtconEol. Tbe County should reserve
rightof-way width, and
"gse55
right-of-way along this funre designatedfour-lane brterial.
o Widen Camp Mohave Road, Bouodary Core Road, King Street' and Coumwig[t
Roadto four lanesbetweensR 95 and the funrre designatedfourlane arterial.
.

ExteDdBullhead Parkway &om SR 95 west to V€teransMemorial Parkway.

Lirru & Associates

Ari,zotuIIyIate of the CRnIS - Page44

FIGI'RB V-l
ARIZONA IMPRO\TEMENTSAND
LONG.RANGE TRANSPORTATIONPLAT{
N

.'1

h

\,'-

Soe ltlsct
Bclow

Improvement Plan Network

N
A/
/v
r

o

Lhna & Associates

4 Through PavedLanes
Improve to 2 Through PavedLanes
Existing 2 l-ane Roadway
Study Area Boundary
SpecialArea
Future Traffic Signal

Arizona apdate of the CRRTS- Page 45

N

FIGIJRE Y - 2
ARIZONA IMPRO\IEMENTS AT{D
LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN
2OI7TRAFFTCVOLT]MES

A

ImprovementPlan Volurnesin 100sof Vehicles
Existing Roadway
PlannedRoadway
Study Area Boundary
SpecialArea

Lima & Associates

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS- Page 46

TRANSPORTATION STI'DMS
by this study:
The following studiesare either in progressor recommended
'
o Completethe designconceptandpublic meetingsfor a bridge crossing
rCompletethedesignconceptandthedesignforSR63throughthemountainpass.
to Needles
o Completea design conceptfor witlening SR 95 ftom Courtwdght Road
Bridge.
.InitiateandcompleteafeasibilityStudyofrelocatingSRg5fromthevicinityof
of Needles'
Cournvright RoadconnectingI-40 just northwestof the City
olnitiateandcompleteafeasibilitysnldyofrelocatingSRg5fromBullheadParkway
connectingto I-40 eastof the ColoradoRiver'
southeast
.

Bypasscrossing
conducr a detailed traffic analysisfor the proposedHoover Dam
the ColoradoRiver in the Bullhead/Laughlinarea'

.

Initiate and completea BullheadCity Transit Planning Study'

OfiMR

PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning and Designing Streets
area as
The following recornmendationswill help improve traffic circulation in the study
new streetsare constructedand existing streetsare reconstructed:
.

since Butlhead ciry and ponions of Mohave valley are within the - Bullhead
ParticulatePM,ononattainmentarea,lacalandcollectorstreetsinfuture
sttbdivisionsin Mohave valley should bepaved with either curbs or paved shoulders
to red.ucevehicleparticulate emissions'

o The internal circulation systemsfor newly developedand redevelopedareasshould
becoordinatedtbroughapartnershipoftheCily,County,IndianReservation'
ADOT andPrivatedeveloPers.
o New and improved arterial streetsshouldbe continuousand run parallel to SR 95 in
order to reducetrafhc on the stateroute'
o To rrinimize the number of new accesspoints along state routes, accessfor newly
developedand redevelopedareas should be coordinated among the city' county,
Fort Mojave Indian Reservation,and ADOT'

Lina & Associates

Arimna Upiloteof the CRRTS- Page47

Metropolitan Planning Organization
An urban area of 50,000 personsor more is eligible to be designatedas a Metropolitan
Planning Organizxllsn (MPO) by the Federal Deparmrent ef ftansportation. An MPO
would have transportationplanning responsibility for the urban area and would be eligible
for federal funds. According to the population forecasts, the combined population of
BullheadCity and the Town of Iaughlin will reach approxinately 50,000 within ten years.
ln addition, the urban growth in the Fort Mojave lndian Reservation;Mohave County,
Ariz.ona; and Clark County, Nevada could accelerate the population growth in the
contiguous urban area. Local governments should begin to work with the Local
GovernmentSectionof ADOT's Transportationplanning Group, NDOT, and the Federal
Highway Administration (FI{WA) in laying the groundwork for an MPO.
for plan monitoring and updatingwill help set the technicalgroundwork.
Recommendations
ln addition, local govemmentsshould begin to discussobjectivesfor the MPO and begin
to researchthe technicaland institutional requirementsfor forming an MPO.
A formal Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) should be set up to monitor
populationgrowth and the progressmadetoward implementingthe tralsportation plan. The
committee should also develop a time schedule,process, and list specific steps for the
transitionto an MPO. It is importantthat political leadershipbe establishedfor the TPO
and that a "champion" be identified to steerthe implementationof the transportationplan.

Transit Planning
Alrhough transit planning was not within the scopeof this study, transit will fulfill mobility
needs,particularly for the tftrDsportationdisadvantaged,and help to reduce vehicle-miles
traveled. Bullhead City is currently negotiating with ADOT to conduct a citywide transit
study. I transit study is needed to identify transit needs, develap a transit plan, and
prepare a transit program with definite transit proiects andfunding sources.

IMPLEMENTATION
lmportant fansportation issuesin the Colorado River Region include a new bridge crossing
in the Bullhead laughlin area, the Hoover Dam Bypass, and a direct connectionof SR 95
in
to I40. All these issueshave far reaching local, refional, and statewide'consequences
both Arizona and California. A partnership of the state transportation agencies,cities,
counties, and the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation should be formed to: l) build a
consensuson the major iszues, 2) structure an orgeniTedapproach to the iszues, 3) and
partner on funding the needed transportation improvements. The parrrership could
collectively work to identif existing funding sourcesand focusing on finding new sources
of funding.
A formal regional tra1sportation planning organization should be formed as a focus for
identifying fiansportation needs and solutions. As the urbanized area approaches50,000

Lina & Assocfuiles

Arizpna Uplate of the CRX?S- Page48

into an MPO' The
population, the transportationplanning organizationcould develop
would be an organizedforum for
F..lsportation pianning org"rriritioo "ia Gn an MPO
improvemens.
,oUtio'i anJ leveragingtransportariontunding for needed
;ff;.;G
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
the recommended
A trensportationimprovementprogram was developedfor implementing
and tl-re responsibleagency.oJ -agelcies
o*opo*tion plan. Horizon^y.i', -pl*'
.
"ottt,
Estimated- improvement costs include funds
summarized improvements io ttt.
p*"-f""*progr^ammedbyADOT,BultheadCity,orMohaveCounty'Costsforprojects
thathavenotbeenprogrammedwereestimatedbasedontheunitcostspresentedinTable
V-l.TheimprovementcostsarealsosummarizedbythetotalcostforeachagencyinTable
V-2.TheimprovementprogramshowninTableVS-includesaphasingofdesignand
constructionofimprovements-overa20-yearperiod.TableV4summarizesirrrprovements
agencies resporsible for
according to esti;nted costs and the appropriate agency or
implementingthe imProvements.

TABLE V-1.. UNTTCOSTS
Unit Cost
ImprovementTYPe
Constructand pave a 2-lattecitylcounty road

$150,000/mile

$500,000imi1e
Consmrcta New 4-l,ane City/County Road or
Reconstructa Z-larreCity/County Road to 4 Lanes
Constructa new 4lane rural stateroad
Constructa New Bridge
Install Traffrc Signal

$700,000/mile
$10,000,000
$100,000

Study
Design ConceptRePort

$150,0m

Note: Coss includedesignandconringencies

Lima & Associates

Aizorn Updateof the CRRIS - Page49

TABLE V-2. STJMNIARYOF COSTSBY AGENCY
ZOOI-Z0Y
$0

fotA
$37,365,000

BullheadCitY

$9.125,000 $28,240,000

MohaveCountY

$1,135,000 $3,525,000 $16,500,000 $21'160,000

ADOT
Fort Mojave lndian
Tribe
Partnership
Totals

Lima & Assocides

$0

$65,3s0,000

$2,900'000

$0

$2,900,000

$800,000 $10,650,000

$0

$11,450,000

$34,200,000 $31,1s0,000
$0

$+5,260,000 $76,465,000 $16,500,000$138'225'000

lrWno (IPdateof the CRRTS- Page50

IIl

.s

Fl

$
t :
FI

!a
q

'1 .
l,''

5

I

*

t.,

s

l"l

z
N

t.
I
".1
Nl

{r

I

rl

a

(\l

z

6rl
I

II
I

I
II
II

zE-

I
II

E
-l

I

c{ 1....
,t.:
FI
A\l
C\l

-lat)
F
CJ

60

tf
Ig:

U
t=

Fl

s

l:'
I

l',;.r

llo

t5

Eli

.-

H
IE
a,rt -

EIE
'5'lE
t-lt
t3
t!

3:^
E E'j

E33i53i 3E$

BF

14
IE

IF

-.E
":'E I E
99E

&/

EiEEYaE
Xd -e

.s
tJ

t

s9:
f;E€E?€t
Egg
538s9'iri

s
l'

s
\]

6r

$ .9ot.r

:! I E.s

^

iE*s;
L !.t: E\o

EiE:gs

=qg E? P
s
EEEEE
d
! e o t - -( .n2

6!r

a C

7 ?q \

2 4

h6

E u caa'z

e

oHEg>

*g e e
= erE

-c u')

E

55p55xi#$85fi

'^-,
lrl

e>
99
ER
!-

F

,6

{

f..''."

i".':
{1'"
'; ,::,.
"''

lq
.?

itt..
io
.6

z

i::,,,:'

1,,'
lt-:''-

:::..

19 .,:,

I

|V',

i:
ia
ra,

a.

i ,.-

: :.'
iaa
:. a)

l,-

''......

i,:.'

i'.

I

i.

F

-'

il,,

N

z

e

iE

l

;>

z

U

a

'
I

F
I

I

>

g.

11

F

o
^
U'

'-l

.j

b6

99

9P
:(JO

Etr'

9p*1!Px

eIl.

ti .

.'''

.i,'.

?
q
E

:,.:

*
(J

;xxxx
,'

x

z

)a

;^

;\

;\

q)

'=d,=

s

€<<<<
oraioo
rb\OO(.)
=qQ-]2
r.)

U

+3

'
v5566
6.jodlA

(.t

N

z
tt)

na

F

tt)

U
F

z
2

a^l

tr

E

v)
F
F

(\

rh

F

O

+
,.1
F.

q

F

.s

g\

v,

o

g

o
l
\01
&l

'l

n
s

.s
'.l

\

t"

i:

Fg

a0

.9

n

O

il,

I

1,.
luo

.zz

l"'o

x=

-

l^

x

I
.i

i_

-:

,. OU

i

{

oi

:

o'

.Eoo

.:lF

9.

*

x

\ir

==
i r l . ' ^ aI

€
s

88R 5:
-1.|O

5E5F
jjea--i

i6
.f

t5
l,.i

:i
:' :

,t

I
N

,.-.
i.r

,9 9 9
ooo
OU()

lo'
I

z

60
as

::

tbo

I

:-

,''i

le!

(u

__

R

l"

.

1..

II
I

z
o
F
th

U

z
2.
ld

I

v'l

$

lo\

l-

I

l-

t.

l6
hl'H
5t9

h

ilr s

RIE'6
;
l>
to

a

cl

n

lr.r

lo!

It

o

i:

oE

'*
itr -o,

.e.9
;-Q E

E

ii',

({l

IiE E.E

F F,

F6E6
I
th

F

II
I

g

II
I

t

!-

I
I

r'l

ut

lag

a

le s
F

iq
aat,
fit

lee
18e

t€

lsE
6
ls
It
l>,

.o
:&

E

<

l€

-E

13

:&
,ot

'E

tl xB

t*o

ll\o

l'

t*

o

o9
\OH

5

tE .9
11."o

ra

d,
l)
q)

,.

.he
-'-l

^
E

{

PLAN MONITORING AND UPDATING
systembe mon]r111d1n a
The rapid gror+th of the areanecessitatestbat dre trrnsportation
every five-years' i'ontinuous
,aufo t..i, and the transportation plT b: updated
monitoringofthetrarsportationsystem.willallow.prefficientperiodicundatinqo|the
use
plan. Thi followinidatabases shouldbe maintainedfor monitoring land
o.*po*ioo
and transportatiotrsysrcms:
o Streetinventory
r Travelcharacteristics
. Socioeconomicconditions
record of the transponation
Maintenanceof these databaseswill provide an up-to-date
on how well the system is
syst"m and will provide the City and bounty with information
performing.

Street InventorY
updatedon a yearly
lnventory of curent streetconditionspresentedin this report shouldbe
parking lanes, 2)
basis and include the following charaiteristics: 1) number of travel and
traffrc signals
roadwaywidth, 3) estimateso1 ttt""t segmentcapacity,and 4) locationof
andstopsigns.

Ttavel Characteristics
city and
The city currently maintains a databaseof trafFrc counts. Furthermore, the
should establish a regular traffic count program so there will be accuratetrafirc
county
-information
over.a ttrei-year period. The trafltc count program would collect 48count
agencies
hour averagedaily traff,rc counts otr selectedsteet segments. ln addition, the
should conlnue to perform traffic counB of traffiC signal warrant studies in accordance
yearly database
with the Manual of Uniform Traff,rcControl Devices as well as maintain a
on accidents.

Street and Traffrc Database
using
Street condition and traffic count data should be maintained on a regular basis
to a
databasemanagementsoftware. The agencieswould maintain the data according
network map and then transfer the data into a TRANPLAN format
ffotteO fnel\IeUl
LtuU"r.. The data would be referencedby streetname, ANODE, and BNODE'

. Linn & Associates

Arizpna Ilpdateof the CRRTS- Page55

Conditions
Socioeconomic
InordertomaintaintheTRANPLANtrafficforecastmodel,itisimportantthatthe
dwelling units; 2)
following socioeconomicdata be kept up rc date: 1) number of
City
populatiJn; and 3) employment for commercial, offrce, and industrial uses' The
tract,
block'
by
ihould continueto maintain its residential and commercialpermit database
andlotnumber.Thecurrentpermitdatabaseshouldbemodifiedtoincludethe
industrial'
correspondingTAZ number, tract and block, and a classificationof commercial,
andoffice uses.
TRAFFIC FORECASTING MODEL
for this study'
The TRANPLAN traffic forecastingmodel for the CRRTS areawas updated
in a database
As noted previously, the street and traffic data should be maintained
could then be
referencediy eftfObE and BNODE numbers' The TRANPLAN model
and funds, it is
updated quiikly and inexpensively. Due to limited staff resources
model as
,i"oln-rod.d ihat the city use an outside consulrantto run the TRANPLAN
to the city: 1)
needed. The following data for a TRANPLAN model have beensubmitted
generation'
1995 and future network datz, 2) spreadsheetfor socioeconomicdata and trip
and 3) TRANPLAN controlfiles.

REVENUE SOI.JRCES

recommended
This section discusses potential revenue sources for funding the
ransponadon improvemenls.
Highway User RevenueFund (lIURf)
are generatedby tlre
The HURF is the primary state highway funding source' Revenues
following tiaxesand fees relarcdto motor vehicle use:
o
r
r
o
o
e

Gasolineand fuel taxes
Motor carrier taxes
Vehicle licensestaxes
Motor vehicle registration fees
Borderglossingfees
Other miscellaneousfees

TheStateConstitutionlfunitstheuseofHURFreve[uestofundoolyhighways,notother
as an entitlement
""*p*^.l."modes.TheHURFrevenuesarecollectedanddepositedintotheFundand
ai,t,iuot.a to ADoT, cities, towns, andcounties. Fundsare distributed
Futd'
,frur" -a are proportionalto populationand to -the Economicftreneth-hoject
projects'
HuRF distributionsmaybeusedasa debtservicefor revenuebond
Arizow tJPdateof fte CRRIS ' Page56
Lima & Associates

Local Tiansportation AssistanceFund (LTAD
the
The LTAF is funded by the Arizona lnttery for use by cities and towns lequesting
all
funds. The LTAF funds are allocated in proportion to the relative population of
Arizona cities and towns. Each requestingmunicipality is guaranteeda minimum of $10
thousanddollars. currently, $23 million may be depositedin LTAF from the Arizona
lottery fund each fiscal year. Cities and towns greater than 300,000 persoDsmust use
tTAi runasfor public 6ansportation. ln addition, up to ten percentof the requestedfirnds
assistance'
may be usedfor the arts, or disatledandhandicapped
The Regional Area Road Fund (RARF)
Some counties are granted authority by State law (A.R.S. 42-L482 through 42-1484) to
exact transportationexcisetaxessubjecttO voter approval. The statutepermits an increase
in existingialestaxesby as muchas l0 percentfor trarsponadonprojecn'

Federal Ilighway Funds
Federal funds are apportioned in accordance with the 1991 Intermodal Surface
TrarsportationEfFrciencyAct (ISTEA). The fundsincludethe following categories:
.
.
r
.
.
o
o
o
.
r
.
r
o
r

lnterstateConstruction
lnterstateMaintenance
National Highrvay System
SurfaceTransportationProgram (STP)
CongestionMitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)
TransportationEnhancementFunds
Bridge Replacementand RehabilitationFunds
SafetyFunds
Rail-Highway CrossingImprovementFunds.
Highway PlanningResearch
MetropolitanPlanning
Minimum Allocation
Donor StateBonus
Maintenance

The FY 95-96 estimatedstatewideapportioment was approximately$271.3 million.

o
Limt & Associates

Arizorw Uplate of the CRRTS- Page57

Local Government Transportation hogram
The Arizona Deparfinent of Transportation administers a federally funded Local
GovernmentTransporation Program for the Metropolitan Planning OrganizationsO'IPOs)
Approximately $52.0 million was
and the rural councils of Governments (coco.
allocated for Local Government projects in FY 95-96. The bulk of this amount,
approximately$,!1.3 million, was allocatedto the Maricopa Associationof Governments
(PAG). The remainderwas allocatedto
o,iac) -a tle Pirna Associationof Govemments
tte four rural coGs and to the Yuma Metropolitan Planning organization (YMPO).
Funds which are eligible to be distributed to the rural coGs include: 1) State
TransportationProgram (STP) funds, 2) bridge replacementand/or rehabilitation funds, 3)
safety funds, and 4) rail-highway improvementfunds'
Economic Strength Projects Fund
Local govemments are eligible sponsors and co-sponsors of transportation projects
frnancel by the Arizona Economic Srength Projects fund. This fund is sponsoredby the
provide at
Arizona Deparunentof Cornmerceand funped by HURF. A local match must
least 10 percentof the project cost. The fund furancesselectedroad projecs that suppon
objectives.
economicdevelopment

Governor's Oflice of Highway Safety
Federal funds are allocatedto finance stateand local governmetrthighway safety projects.
by the
These program funds, in the form of reimbursable contracts, are administered
.Highway
Govemor,J Office of Highway Safety. Funds are provided under the National
(FI{WA)
SaferyAct and funded *[ougtr grants from the Federal Highway Administration
priority
and ire Nationat Highway Traffic Safety Adininistration (NHSTA). The safety
areasiue listed below:
NHSTA Priority Program Areas
r
.
r
r
o
.
o

Police traffic services
Emergencymedical services
tnpaired driving
Occupantprotection
Trafhc records
Motorcycle safeU
Pedestrian/bicycle safetY

Linn & Asnciotes

FHWA Priority ProgramAreas

'

o Corridor safetyimprovementprograns
o Rural and local technical assistance
pro$arns
r Safety sildies of specific safetY
problems
o Pedestrianand bicYclesafetY
r Outreachprograms
r Safetymanagementsystems

Arizpna Updateof the Cfnfs - Page58

Public Transit
Publictransitforsmallurbanandruralareasisfundedbyfederaltransportationfirndsftom
generalpublic servicein rural
Sectiors5310, 5311' 5303' and 5313. Section5311 funds
public systems in
$3.8 mitlion is funded annually for general
npp-*i-"tely
"r".r.
Arizona'sruralandsmallurbanareas.Sections5303and5313fundsareavailablefor
statewideplanningtransitassistance.TheSection5310Programfundsvehicles-for
These services include
specializedtransportation services for the elderly or disabled.
sources for the
trips, meal deliveries, and miscellaneoustrips' Revenue
;;;;*g.t
DevelopmentBlock
Ip."t"f'il"a services include oldei America Act Funds' Community
Grant funds, County funds, and private funds'
ADoTisalsothedesignatedgranteeforFederalTransitAuthority(FfA)Section5303'
trarsit planningassistance'
MpO traosit planningAssistarice,andSection5313for rural
Funding
Pedestrian/BicYclist
are available ftom
Revenuesourcesfor bicycle facilities primarily used for transportation
the following sources:
.Federalfundsareavailabletoconstructbicycletransportationfacilitiesand
pedestrianwalkways on land adjacentto any highway on the National Highway
System(NHS).
.

and
Federal knds Highway Funds are available to cotlsmrct bicycle facilities
pedestrianwalkways in connectionswith roads, highways, and parkwaYs' -These
irod, *" distributed at the discretionof the departmentadministeringthe funds.

Other availablefunding for bicycle and pedestrianfacilities are:
r

The National RecreationalTrails Fund which provides for bicyclist and pedestrian
recreationalprograms.

r

The ScenicByways Program which can fund bicycle facilities alonghighways.

r

FederalTransit Fundswhich can be usedto provide bicycle and pedestrianaccessto
transit facilities, including sheltersand bicycle parking facilities'

Lit u & Associates

Arimnn Updateof the CRRIS - Page59

REFERENCES
study, JHK and Associates,
JHK & Associates,colorado River ReqionalTransportation
1993.
Louis Berger,Final Reoort.LaughlinBridse Ircation Studv,March l' 1996'
PresnellAssociates,lnc. Preliminary: TransportationPlanning Srudyfor the colorado
River Aeencv. VolumeIV. Fort Mojavelndian Reservation'

o

Lirna & Associates

Arizotu UPdateof the CAXff - Page60

APPENDTXA
CT]RRENTSOCIOECONOMIC DATA
BY TRANSFORTATIONA}IALYS$ ZONE

TABLE A-I. HilSTING POPTJLATIONAND EMPLOYMENT
ANALY$S ZONES
BY TR,ANSPORTATION

EmploymentData
PoPulalion

L9v1
DUs

I

r,027

41

30

20

0

0

2

3,091

L327

65

10

0

0

J

1,006

432

0

0

937

N2

0

0

0

0

5

9g

414

0

50

0

0

6

622

?57

150

20

30

0

7

809

0

U

8

2,094

899

r75

0

0

0

9

790

339

0

0

0

0

l0

834

358

180

45

0

0

l1

1,145

491

t20

0

0

0

12

529

a.r1

190

35

0

0

t3

1,869

50

0

{n

0

181

50

.0

2n

0

Lgn
TAZ

OIIice

0

i1

160

.w2

General

t5

0.

0

0

0

500

0

16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

t,426

612

6sQ

35

65

0

75

35

40

0

18

0

l9

519

m

1,090

458

100

0

250

0

al

588

252

115

0

0

0

.ta

|,617

6v

205

0

205

0

25

0

.300

0

0

190

0
0

2t5

23

xn

24

4

25

359

LY

0

0

o

26

t43

6t

0

0

0

'r1

2%

tn

2W

l5

1m

28

868

2ffi

175

0

29

2,Vn
0

0

0

0

0

30

605

45

30

EO

97
)

2fi

.30

TABLE A-1. DilSTING POPIJLATTON AND EII{PLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES (CONtiNUEd)

TAZ
31

EmploymentData

Lgn

.9n

Population
2:19
'105

JJ

Dus

General

Retail

t20

65

0

70

0

2

0

0

0

0

45

0

0

0

0

34

0

0

0

0

0

0

35

0

0

0

0

I

0

14

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

l5

0

0

0

0

2U

100

40

425

0

JO

37

0

38
tt

&

662

41

193

83

50

20

630

270

u0

45

'0

0

t79

77

EO

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

)
It

0

45

29

46

t2

5

0

0

40

0

47

0

0

0

0

0

0

48

0

0

0

0

0

49

601

258

40

.95
l0

50

29

12

0

0

0

5l

0

0

0

0

0

0

52

0

0

0

25

0

20

0

53

3,851

.0

,0

r,657

80

0
'0

0
I,200

0

v

0

0

0

0

55

0

I

0

0

0

0

56

n

1''

0

0

0

0

57

0

0

0

0

0

0

58

75

t2

0

J

0

59

557

239

l4

0

0

0

60

363

156

0

0

JJ

ll

0

TABLE A-1. EKSTING POPT]LATIONAND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYS$ ZONES(continued)

TAZ

1997
Population

61

627

62

785
''0

EmploymentData

L997
Dus

6eneral
,n

2j,9
t5l

80

ol

0

69

6l

0

0

18

2

0

0

255

109

30

8

10

0

65

?8

t2

0

0

0

0

66

28

It

0

0

0

0

67

3U

0

0

0

68

0

0

63
g

165

0

193

83

0

69

675

2n

15

5

0

0

70

39

t7

0

0

0

0

l0

0

0

'0

'0

7l

lot

45

72

384

165

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

146

0

0

0

0

0

0

I

0

0

0

w
75
16

130

56

0

0

f,

0

77

499

2t4

30

l0

l0

0

78

l0

4

0

0

0

0

79

286

r23

l4

80

40

8l

r,006

82

250

lm

83

w

l/t8

56

85

l6l

86

t,m7

n

.6

0
0

{

0
.,

0

0

0

0

0

o

0

vl

0

0

0

0

a

l5

5

62

0

4l

108

30

'1)

0

5(X

216

131

40

60

0

88

276

118

150

0

50

0

89

33

14

50

50

100

0

90

r.657

E

15

50

0

u

1.,

5

0

432

13

7lr

.0

,.

0

AND EMPLOYMEI{T
A.1. DilSTING POPT'JLATION
TABLE
--iv
(contbued) '
zoNEs
ANALY$S
rnl,usponrATloN

L997
Population

Emplolment Data

1997
Dus

General

Office

91

1,438

6t7

0

0

60

0

92

4?4

182

100

100

100

0

93

1,055

453

0

100

2@

0

94

653

2W

50

25

25

0

95

908

390

100

100

100

0

96

235

101

fu

250

0

25

25

0

.50
fU

97
I

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

100

60

26

0

0

0

0

101

0

0

0

0

0

0

rgz

0

0

0

0

103

)/

u

0

0

- 104

0

0

0

0

105

51

n

0

106

I

0

@

98
I

r07

0

.0
0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

30

0

0

0

0

108

5

7

0

0

0

0

109

I

0

0..

0

0

0

ll0

10

4

0

0

0

0

1ll

24

10

0

0

0

0

rt2

124

53

0

0

0

0
,,

0

0

0

0

0

I

0

0

0

0

r3n

561

0

0

0

0

lLJ

114
l15
116

6v2

291

80

0

m

0

LI'

199

85

80

0

20

0

95

80

0

m

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ll8
119

.'

tm

54

23

TABLE A-T. E)(ISTING POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALY$S ZONES (continued)

TAZ

1997
Population

Emplolm.ent Data

1997
Dus

General
0

0

2A

0

J

22

0

I

20

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

61

0

0

o

0

115

49

0

0

0

0

107

46

0

0

0

tJl

43

18

0

0

0

o

t32

10

0

0

0

0

133

68

29

0

0

0

0

lv

5

7

0

0

0

0

135

0

0

0

0

0

0

1!6

0

0

0

0

0

0

137

5

2

0

0

0

0

138

79

0

0

0

0

139

0

0

0

0

0

0

llm

0

0

0

0

0

0

14l

8

.'

0

0

0

0

142

0

0

0

0

0

0

t43

0

0

0

0

0

0

144

0

0

0

0

0

0

I

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

t21

ll

)

6

122

94

40

80

123

126

54

65

tu

7A7

104

80

125

504

2t6

126

246

106

lz7

88

38

rtt

r43

129
130

145

v

'0

)

146

0

147

8

148

0

0

0

0

0

0

149

0
.,

0

0

0

0

0

I

0

0

0

0

150

AND EMPLOYMEIYT
TABLE A.1. EKSTING FOPT,JLATION
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYSISZONES(continued)

TAZ

EmployEent Data

1997
Dus

Retail

Office

General

151

0

0

0

0

00

r52

11

5

0

0

00

0

0

0

00

IfJ

o

L997
Populaiion

,0

154

8

J

0

0

00

155

0

0

0

0

00

1:o

I

0

0

0

00

157

U

0

0

0

00

158

8

J

0

159

0

0

0

0

00

160

1()

0

0

00

161

7?

0

0

00

60

00

80

0

150

JI

.0

.0

'0

0

toz

252

108

t6?

378

r62

1g

l9

8

))

0

300

165

0

U

300

0

0

166

0

0

0

0

500

ICI

0

0

0

0

00

168

0

0

0

00

169

0

0

l0

0

0

8,400

170

0

0

0

0

o

2,320

t7l

173

74

0

0

00

t72

I,503

645

0

0

00

t73

0

0

o

t74

0

0

0

o

00

175

0

0

0

0

00

r76

0

0

0

0

00

'0

0

676

290

ll

2

00

178

557

239

11

2

00

r79

0

0

o

0

00

180

375

l6l

10

t

30

5,920

615

TABLE A.I. E) STING POPIJLATION AND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES (continued)

TAZ

1997
Population

181

0

182

r28

183

0

184

375

185

Emplolment Data

L997
Dus

General

Casino

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

U

0

0

161

5

0

8

0

147

6

0

0
:)

186

0

0

18?

161

69
6

0

.0

0
0
1)

0

)

zo

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

U-

0

0

0

6
E

188

IJ

189

69

190

86

l9l

0

0

r92

r05

45

193

0

0

0

0

0

0

194

0

0

0

0

0

0

195

0

0

0

0

0

0

196

0

0

0

0

0

0

197

0

0

0

0

0

198

0

0

0

0

0

0

199

0

0

0

0

0

0

TOTAI.s

57,762

30

24,791

5,542

t,499

4,t49

18,455

APPENDX B
F.I.]TTJRE
SOCIOECONOMIC DATA
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYSIS ZONE

TABLE 8.1. 2OO2POPIJLATION AND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALYSE ZONES

2002
Population
I,052
3,116
r,031
950
9'10
622

TLZ
1
2

)
6
7
8
9
l0
ll

cn

2,1o7
865

u9
I t<9

533
1,877

13
15
16
l7
18
l9

m

21
..,
z5

)<
76

27
28
29
30
32

v
!5
36
5t

38
40
4l
43
44
45
46

.

0..
106
0
1,501
5U
I,l 15
596
1,617
235
?54
4U
418
596

2,m2
.

0
905
4U
154
255
0
0
332
300
0
509
662
2t8
880

lvz
3l
29
0

2ffi2 DUs
452
1,337
44300
40800
416
?s7
353
m4
37r00
3&
497
229
805
181
000
4600
0500
644
225
479
256
694
101
lo9
20800
179
256
889
000
388
t73
6650
110
000
000
74250

Office

30
65

20
10

0
150
160
175

50
20
0
0

180
120
190
50
50

45
0
35
0
0

716
75
100
115
205
L3
n

29
35
0
0
0
0
45

17
333
2m

0
9
175

78
&

25
l2l

5,

0

r2850
000
218
2U
9450n
y8
82
1300
1200
000

87
..71

0
19

101
255

92
0

General

Casino

0050
0075
Eo25
000
0050
0
30
001@
00r75
000
0
0
00120
00225
0
50
20070
0
550
000
0050
5508m
400150
0
250
00115
0
205
0
475
0
308
00
'0
0
0
61
00375
0
0'
660168
00185
t2017
5010
000
000
005
75080
000
0087
0
809
20090
00193
00255
000
000
78078

Total

200

225..

100
550

350
410
488
375
1?
,103
0

899

POPI'LATION AND ENPLOYMEI{T
TABI,E B.I. 2OO2
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYS$ ZONES(continued)

2t02
TAZ

Population

48
49

0
2,235
|,207

fU

51
52
53
54
J)

56
57
58
59
@
61
62
63
&
65
66
67
68
69
70
7l

75
76.
78
79
80
81

&
83

u

'90

85
86
87
88
89
9l
92

0
0
4,735

2ffi2 DUs

0
959
518
0
0

2,o32
I

0
2,059
524
89
663
747
935
728
304
JJ

oK{

463
237
1,823
1,893
124
1,389
1,864
,tt)5
11
155
594
105

n6
63
t,197
0
477
75
t92

r,222
600
216
590
1,389
t,t79
323

884
225
38
?,85
181
320
,f01

3tz
127
14
414
t99
100

u9
813
52
591
800
174
66
u8

t26
2:t
514

0

no
32
80
524
251
109
185
596
509
138

Retail

0
l0l
78
0
0
0
IJJ

0
0.
0
58
0
@

0
22
40
145
I

10r
l9
9
209
205

rt2'
lzl
205
17
103
0
49
0
237
195
68
0

u

209
l4
111
124
295
115
..,

0
83

Office

General

000
9740
0190
0
0
0480
0390
000
000
04930
5420
31
000
0380
87670
81
1600
10lzo
010
9'160
2r40
r70
7000
19
10820
ll
19
2120
9750
0150
16
000

ru2
000
26
000
2180
19

0
0

Casino

1,352
1,142

Total
0
1E
184
E
97
1 1?{t
1,142
l

4
48
l194
9
(0
(0
4t
493
r05
l(

3

0

71

0

34
6
60
38
5

rn6
l!
tyz
l l6 l
59
5

2
l189
l

35
3
I

279
2

149

0

88
149

0
0

?20
?
5t5
'l

160

68

zv

0

100

30
I188
15
I
82
0
4W
195
104
0
44

r52

0

380

0

2t6
2t8
393
458
88
5E'
248

ss70
31
38570
0980
115
13530
0580
83830

740

229

TABLE 8.1. 2OO2FOPT,JLATIONAND dTTPLOYIVENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALY$S ZONES (continued)
EEplolment Dsta

TAZ
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
l@
101
107
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
ll1

tLz
113
114
115
116
l17
l18
l19
120

tzl
t22

r23
tu
t?5
126

tn
128

r29
130
131
L'L
IJJ

t34
135
136
ll7
138

2002
Population
1,203
8ll
954
335
212
0
0
12'l
0
0
0
60
6
81
7
6
12
29
143
0
J

1,548
811
233
2,62
63
L4
110
148
285
590
288
130
168
135
tt<

50
t2
80
0
0
93

2002DUs

General

Retail

5m
y5
N3
t33
85
0000
0000
54
0000
0000
30403
0000
26302
2100
35504
3100
?
5100
13201
61
0000
1000
&92861
38
100
ll3
2000
n403
6550
4769317
63603m
t22ul2|
253
t24
56i0
72
588r6
54715
22302
5100
y
3
0000
0000
3100
40614

0
39
80
53
42

87
19
80
53
21

174
t9
80
263
zl

13

110

l.

0

0

8

|

6

0
0
0

12
20
2L

130
80
s2

Cosino

0
077
o
0
083
00
00
0?4
00
00
08
00
06
0l
09
0l
0l
01
0
015
00
00
0
o
0
0
00

Total

26t
240
368

3'

167
162
100
103

o7

25
L2

10

3
z
l8
|

4.
'1

0
0

3
0

35
17

7

010
090
083
0
063
031
019
018
014
013
05
0l
08
01
00
00
0l
010

.106

POPULATIONAND EI\{SLOYMENT
TABI,E B.T. 2OO2
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYSS ZONES(continued)
Employmenr Data

2002
T
t39
140
t4l
142
143
IM
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
r{1
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
l6l
162
163
1&
165
166
lo/

0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
t0
0
0
8
0
13
0.
9
0
3
0
9
0
19
84
502
628
0
0
2
l7
0
0
0
0

168
169
t70
l7t
172
t73
174
t75
t76

r,4u2

tn

u4

178
179
180
181

874
0
1,456
t,456
ffi3
0
446
1,456

r82

1{t

183
184

0
446

2002
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
0
0
.f

0
6
0
4
0
I
0
0
I
36
2t5
269
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
ffz
375
0
625
6?5
362
2U
0
187
625
65
0
l9z

Genersl

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
I
0
I
0
0
0
I
0
5
16
97
83
259
53
I
0
9
0

o.
8l
25
0
t7
34
50
0
28
449
6
0
17

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
49
0
0
0
f,

0
0
0
0
0
0

o
.,

l5
9
0
8
4l
I
0
0

0
0
U

0
0
0
0
0
0

o
0
I
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0

o
I
4
0
'
ll
.46
0
.39
I
0
,0
0
0
59
,<
0
t2
25
0

o
0
8

3n.
4
0
26

Casino

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,308
0
0
0
8,59
2,13!

r,225
0
2,625
0
0
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0.
0
1

0
I
'0
I
0
0
0
I
0
2
9
65
108
t29.
6,567

n

2
0
8,561
1,ttt

r,225
147
2,eE
0
JI

62
59
0
45
817
1l
0
43

TABLE B-T. 2OO2POPT'LATION AND E}IPLOY}ENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALYSE ZONES (continued)

T

r85
186
187
188
189

r90
191
192
193
TOTAIJ

N7
0
1,432
t6
81
101
0
123
2,235
87

t75
0
613
7
Jf

43
0
17

959

23
0
17
20
)l

6
0
28
160

0
U

0
4
0
1
0
0
15
043

15
0
2t4
l6

0
0
llo

7.498

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
'r1 <7,7

Total
38
0
23t
39
8
11
0
28

2n

TABI,E 8.2. 2fiN FOPI,'LATION AND E]I{PLOYMENT
BY TRANSFORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES

zwr

TLZ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
l3
74
l5

Populotion 2(xn DUs
462
1,077
1,348
3,141
453
1,056
413
962
419
977
267
622
J)5
834
909
2,1t9
4U
%0
371
864

t,r70
537
1,8E4
422
0
213
0

lo

17
18
l9

1<14

530
1,140
ffi3
|,617
u2
ffi
ffi9
793
1,096

2T
2l
7','

?3

u

25
26
.,.|

t 177

28
29
30

0
1,405
529
304
$5
0
0
832
800
0
t,243
62

?','
'J

14
35
36
38
39
40

u3

o

a

1,130

43

2U
56
29

44

45
46

,0

23r
E09
181
0
91
0
677
227
489.
E9
694
lo4
259
26?
340
470',
9ll
00
603
22:t
130
174
0
0
!57
,.lJ

0
531
2V
104
485

Retail
30
65
0
0
0
150
160

t75
0
180
120
190
50
50
0
0
100
761
75
100
115

m5
L'
4,,

0
35
,()5
200
83
8r
10
l0
0
0
l0
l0
0
175

Oflice

2000
1000
0250
000
5000
20300
000
000
000
4500
000
3500
0500
0200
06000
000
000
31
35400
02500
000
02050
06330
63
000
000
ll
n500
000
26700
15400
0250
0100
000
000
'000

n

01500
000
000
26

50

m200

Lzl

10900
000
000
000
01150

w

2Q

12
0

0
0
0

General

Casino

Totsl
50
75
25
0
50
200
160
175
0
1J<

120

',',<

100

7o

580

435

0

74

0

600
0
100
850
150
?{n
?{n
l 1 55
410
410
650
530
0
35
4m
490
375
0
180
l8C
t ??5(

I,l(D

0

35
20
0
0
l0
160
16{
0
175
L7:
.t| 'r..
'rat
90
230
7@
0
0
115

POPI,JLATIONAND EMPI,OYMENT
TABLE B-2. 2OO7
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYSISZONES(continued)

47
48
49
50

0
4,470
1,812

)l

0
0
5,609
7
0

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
fi
61
62
63
g
65
66
67
68

69
70
7t
72
73
74
75
76
Tr
78
79
80
8l
8200
83
u9439
85
86
c7
88
89
90
9l

c2

2fiI7 DUs
00
1,918
777
0
0
0
2,q7
0

4,091
1,048
101
7't0
480
867
1,085
1,456
353
39
1,903
542
272

1,756
450
M
330
206
372
466
625
145
!7
816
232
117

2,9r
3,748
tM
2,394
3,728
469
l1
.180
689
105
265
86

r,407
1,608
59
1,01?
1,600
201

1,389

596

610

2C2

223
1,418
6%
r9
1,147
1,720

vn
nl

77
283
128
36

ffil
286
100
355
481
400
95

Retail
150
115
0
0
0
230
0
0
00370
115
0283
10500
0065
24
46
272

Oflice

General

0
109
29
0
0
72
58
0
0
10

84

95
93
30

72
82
0

19
4

151
28.

+t
.n',

208
39

192
&3
410

134
37

2t9

m

242
410
323
207
0025
68
000
461
38500
t22
000
48435
418
134
115
116

22
37

14
0
298
160
l?6
298

19

150

23

23

198

132

47

19

38
32
35

304
53
76
53

o
r79

147
359

m

179
19
0.
6

11
056
6666

45

0
1 tn?

2,283
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
065
0
0
0
069
04
0
070
035
o
0
0399
0
0
059
o
025
0
00
0
0
0
00
087
0
070

0
273
144
1,503
I 194

72
288
0
370
209
31
105
l9l
221
302

378

537
745
440
745
376
113
790
385
187

760

on3
02(X
0

586

o

7r7

075
0
0

56

7n

AND E]IIPLOYTIEJ'M
TABLE B-2. 2fiN POPTJLATION
zoNES (continued)
ANALY$S
BY TRANSPORTATION

2W
TIA

93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101

Population
1,351
968
1,001
435

v7
00
00
194
00

Loz

o0

103
tol
105

85
00
69
ll
93

r06
t07
108
109
ll0
lll
112
113
114
115
116
t17
118
119
!tn
Itt

t22

ta
tu
t25
126

tn
128
t29
130
131

r32
t33
lv
135
136
L37
138

2fiI7 DUs
552
410
417
165

r37
83

36
29
5
40

6J

11
156

5

?<

1{

t6z
00
42
1,775
929
257
301
15

r77
t26
169
326
676
330
172
192
155
t4
58
146
91
83
00
00
83
106

70

762
399
115
129
Jt

54
73
1,10
290
142
74
82
66
62
25
39

45

General

0
n14
60
55
33
000
000
27220
000
000
916
000

74
60
55
17

148
14
60
276
17

115

201
917
100
?o1
101
JU

t7212
000
000
184
180
80020
86021
'0
7
54.0
58315
56!19
89
70651
34325
21
m214
16
15
614
101
9t7
100
000
000
100
t0

17
0

0
|

122

215
112
111

18

134
45

0
.5

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

?22
54
180
387
66
0
0
49

lo
0
12
J

t7
I
J

2
6
0
0
t)1

100
107
0
'13
9
76
.Ltz
r)1
62
38
36
29

n
10
2
t7
I
0
0
I

l9

TABLE 8.2. 2fiN POPIJLATIONAND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALY$S ZONES(continued)
EmploymentData

20u7
TAZ
.

Population

0
0
0
0
0'
0
4
0
l1
0
0
l4
0
15
0
1l
0

139
140
14l
142
143
1M
145
146
147
148
149
l)u
l5l
152
l)J

154
155
156
157
158
159
1@
l6l
t62
163
1U
165
166
167
168
169
170
t7l
t72

U
1l

0
22

n

'fa',

878
0
0
f

v
0
0
0
0
1,302
I,747
0
2,912

r73
174
175
176
r77
178
t79
180
181

r82
183
184

2,9r2
.

1,0t2
769
0
518
2,912
r77
00
518

Total

2fi17 DUs

0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
'6
0
6
0
)
0
2
0
)
0
9
41

rn
0
0
2
15
0
0
0
0
559
750
0
1,250
1,250
435
330
0

2r2
1,250
76
2n.

000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
101
000
000
201
000
101
000
100
000
100
000
100
000
202
l0t7
18530
108
ltz
27300
79758
202
000
1000
0
000
162
500v)
000
.v
69650
32270
89
000
46
898
12
000
28045

0
0

.0

'12
6l

0

15

118

3

E

160
14
82
l9

14
653

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,ffi
0
0
0
8,7W
J aaa

2,450
0
5,250
0'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
.'
0
2
0
1
0
I
0
I

0
4
l8
70

r20
t73
6,9r3
' t44
4
0
8,7t2
2,333
2,450
291
5,350
0
62
IE
l4l
r05
0
l;533
aa

0

AND EMPIOYMENT
TABI,E B-2. 2M7 EOPT,JLATION
ZONES(continued)
ANALY$S
BY.TRANSPORTATION
-

EmPlolment Dats

.

2Wr

TAz

Po;lation 200,7.?Us Rgil

185
186
187
188
189
190
191
t9?
193

0
2,703
19
93
l16
0
141
4,470

TOTALS

118,@l

203
0
1,156
I
40
.50
0
58
1,918

39.
0
28
15
9
12
0
35
320

OTce

G€l:ral

0
0
0

26
0
354
t2
7
I
0
0

1
1
0
0
29

1aJ

C?mo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Tfl
0
38?
29
2l
0
35
581

TABLJ B-3. 2OI7 POPUI,ATION AND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES
EmDlovment l)ata

TAZ
I
?
5

5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
12
13
l4
15
l6
11

t8
19
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
J.'

35

x6
tl

38
39
40
4I
43
44
45
46
47
48
49

2017 DUs
1 111

3,191
1,106
987
989
622
859
)lM

l,090
894
r los
545
1,899
0
426
0
t,726
540
1,190
618
t,617
257

l,4u
859
I,g3
?,296
) ,,,j

0
2,605
779
604
705
0
0
2,A32
2,000
0
t os?

662
293
1,630
229
106
29
0
0
8,940
3,923

4U
1,370
475
424
424
26'l
369
920
468
384
513
234
815
181
00
183
0
741
232
5ll
265
694
110
603
369
705
985
9s4
00
1,1t8
334
259
303
0
0
872
858

0
r,267
2U
t26
7m
98
45
't')

30
65
0
0
0
150
160
175
0
180
120
lxl
50
50

m
l0
0
U

50
0
0
.45
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
35
35
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
l5
175
0

0
200
850
75
100
115
n5
E
50
0
70
550
200
95
115
m
20
0.
0
20

JU

?20
q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
/t0

0
350

rv)

m

50
160

145
0
0

no
0
0
0
0

0
0
3,837

a8

\2n.

190

0

otal

Retail

.0

0
0
)a
0

0
0
25
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
50
20
700
0
0
65
40
250
0
205
950
690
0
0
100
0
0
80
0
50
20
0
0
0
300
0
0
l,7w
20
0
0
0
0
190
0
l8l
480
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
o
0
070
0
00
0
0
0.
0
0
0
o
0
00
070
0
o
00
0
0
070
040
0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

50
I)

25
0
50
2W
160
t75
225
120
225
100
700
200
950
150
350
115
410
975
840
665
375
205
335
0
0
20

3m
0
350
1,899
90
305
270
0
0
190
0
451
238

TABLE B-3. 2017 POPI,JLATION AI\D EMPI'OYMENT

ANALYSISzoNEs (continued)

iv-rm,xsponrATloN
2017
---6--

o
sl
szo6ool19o119
7,356
s3
s414-'i1o1o2
550000000
8,155
56
2,os7
s7
58r3:.;iou2o26
slz
s9
605ziiool1eolle
1,106
61
1,3E5
62
z'st3
63
450
&
6s4sn5o4o10
3,i7i
66
6ee
6i
350
68
5,?66
69
7,45o
70
'71

'

181

4's67

9s

o

475

o
21

rzs
198

o
0

12s
4le

196

o

o

o

196

475
ssa
r'iso
i8o

27
57
525
56

110
1r7
58
15

84
103
o
19

0
0
o
o

22r
n7
583
90

r,izo
ioo
l5o
z,sx
,',r@

416
11
39
7gl
820

38
?
4
2&
7s

302
56
28
0
596

9
o
0
0
o

zsu
140
70
l'054
l'491

74

433

39

315

0

787

485
820
66
413

44
75
6
38

3sz
596
48
300

o
0
o
o

881
1'491
l2o
750

105
0
go7

35
0
389

35
0
E9

o
0
0

176
0
1'555

2!O

89

35

0

354

96
836
10
121
lo0
728
308
13

70
608
43
81
6
af
6rl
30
51
31
95
2
20
302

0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
093
0
O
0
O

175
1'520
57
235
r77
y'l
| '?33
50
51

0
4
20
ffi

9
76
3
34
31
o
308
8
0
31
48
2
?n
60

54

5

39

o

l,ist

380

o

s,ioo
-r00

o
?30

it

1,8?o
o-,*
;;
g,zm
7,456
73
ist
5eE
74
I
I
75
76?2s980046046
351
878
n
6
10
78
134
244
79
80:r325576400076/
1fi
1,771
81
82000000o
437
876
83
y
r32
84
114
2W
85
173
1,80E
86
355
E&
87
81
rr7
88
696
2,261
89
250
583
90
1830
4
Q
2
91
lE831
92
651
l,&7
93
539
1,2E3
94
444
t,093
95
230
6v
' m 6 1 696
24A1688032
980000000
ggoo0000o
327
l@

--o

4'567

o

140

0

143
8
50
423

98

TABLE 8.3. 2 T7 POPI'LATION AND EMPLOYIVTENT
BY TRANSPORTATION ANALY$S ZONES (continued)
Emplo

ent Data

2017
TAZPopir|ation2017DUsRelai|osceGmjralCa:inoTog|
0
0
0------0--0
101
1020000000
13
2
l8
48
112
103
1040000000
y
110
14
86
105
106zo930206
14
2
19
50
ll7
lo7
t2ol0t
11
108
10970g30206
2
o
3
8
19
110
5
|
7
19
45
111
3?4060
1r220oi;3f
o
0
0
b
o
1l3
1r45;10107
267
33
367
S5o
2,227
115
70
0
280
500
1,166
116
20
0
80
r44
335
rl7
23
0
90
rcz
377
118
119s21010?
111
15
39
91
L2o

0

0

0

34

026
0

35

0
014

6

0

o

0
0
0
0

668
350
tot
ll3

0n

i.,'t')g43007

i;;i68362eo47
2rz
rz3
,loe
124
848
rE
4r4
126
256
rn

tl
lie
3a
tie
iro

103
241
lX
i3
1e4
rzg
77
lEo
130
3
1
7
2
131
7
17
132
49
It4
133
5
I
l
t34
1350000000
1360000000
s
ll
137
57
133
138
13go000000
1,10060.0000
0600000
141
1420000000

2
|
13
6
4

16
24
lo2
50
3r

0
o
0
o
o

s
r23
E4
lu
77

rrc
32
30
12
3
19
2

4
3
r
l9
0
2
0l0

29
21
n',

72
58
54

2
14

0
0
0
0n
o
0

z
n'

010
2'

16

0

46
n
140
63.
42

5
34
3
3
40

-r43o6ooooo

1440600000
1455ir0102
1460000000
14izo2o4
r47
1480609000
l4goo0o00o
ll
r50
.25

4

0

3

0

8

TABLE B-3. 2OI7POPT]LATIONAND EMPLOYMENT
BY TRANSPORTATIONANALYS$ ZONES(continued)

TAZ
151
t52
153
154
155
156
t57
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
t67
168
169
t7l
t72
173
t74
175
t76
111

178
t79
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
t87
188
189
190
191

r92
r93
TOT

7 DUs

0
19
0
l3
0
7
0
0
27
tzl
r t<')
1,378
0
0
10
69
0

o
0
0
1,100
3,495
0
5,825
5,825
1,348
980
0
660
s tt{
725
0
6fi

ffiz
0
5,244
24
n6
145
0
177
8,940

00
83
00
62
00
31
0
6
0

Retail

0
2
0

1'

<t
)31

591
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
I,500
0
2,500
2,5N
579
421
0
2&
t <rn

n
0
283
258
0
2,243
l0
50
62
0
7l
1,837

0
2
0

0
0
0

20
20
130
r69
300
131
)
0
t0
0
0
324
100
0
69
138
6l
t6
0
83
|,797
25
0
51
0
5l

'0

o

z

0
0
0
0

0

U

0

0
.,

15

i

0

z

@

U

0
0
0
12

l5
92
0
95

0
0
0
0
29
0
0
6
l3
52
30
0

0
0
0
0
236
100
0
50
100
0
0
0
25
1,307
18
0
8t
48
0
631

t<

163
.2
0
0
0
0
0
t

L9
24
0
50
639

z
2
0
0
58

14
tn

0
0
465
15.96

Casino
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'1 ?n1

0
0
0
9,003
t '11)

4,900
0
10,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0 0
0
0
0
0
455

Total

0
6
0
4

0
2
0
0
8
JO

80
145
261
7,&7
238
9
0
9,013
2,372
4,900
589
10,7m
0
125
250

no

196
0
r32
3,267
45
0
t32
rto

0
682
7
35
44
0
50
1,162
8t.797

CITY OF BULLHEADCITY
1 2 5 5M a r i n aB o u l e v a r d
BullheadCity,AZ 86442-5733
(520)763-s400

TDD (520)763-9400

June24, '1998

Mr.PeteLima
LIMAANDASSOCIATES
7250North16thStreet,Suite412
Phoenix,AZ 85020
DearMr. Lima:
- ARIZONAUPDATEOF
OF TRANSPORTATION
RE: ARIZONADEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION
STUDY
THE COLORADO
RIVERREGIONAL
At theirmeetingof May 19, 1998,the BullheadCityCouncilvotedto acceptthe Arizona
Study,
Updateto the ColoradoRiverRegionalTransportation
thismatter,pleasecontactMs.JanicePaul,
Shouldyou haveanyquestionsregarding
PlanningOfficialat (520)763-0123.
Sincerely,

PatriciaG. Nichols,CMC
City Clerk
/dlp

cc:

lleneFrisch,Community
Development
Director

A\
/iffi\\

NITY
\_, OFBULLHEADCITY

i.[W7-T.oLrNCrLcoMMUNrcArroN
\#iz

MEETTNG
DAIE:05/r9/98

' ir ' '
SUBJECT:

DEPTOF ORIGIN:
DATESUBMITTED:
SIJBMITTEDBY

ARIZONA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION- AR]ZONA
UPDATE OF THE COLORADO RIVER REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION
STI.JDY
CDD - PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
MAY 7, 1998
ILENE S, FRISCH,COMMLTNITYDE\€LOPMENT DIRECTOR

Stttwut:
Thisis a request
for theMayorandCity Councilto accepttheArizonaUpdateto theColoradoRiverRegional
I ransDonallon
5tuov.
In June,tSS6theArizonaDepartment
of Transportation
entered
in to a contractwith Lima& Associates
to
updatethe Arizonaportionofthe Coloradofuver RegioralTransportation
Study.Thefirst stepin updatewas
to analyzeexistingsocioeconomic
proposedin
andtransportation
conditions.Next, roadwayimprovements
the 1993Studywerereyi1,;;g,ito identifoifenhancements
and/orchanges
shouldbe madeto the original
therecommended
transportation
of futureconditions,
Basedon'theanalysis
[:qi;filcid"-d itLp?ouements.
programwasdeveloped.
improvement
/planwasrevised.[n additio4a transportation
(TAC)comprised
AdvisoryCommittee
of individuals
Development
of theupdatewasguidedby a Technical
representing
thefollowingagencies:
(ADOT)
ArizonaDepartmentof Transportation
BullheadCity
MohaveCounry
Fort MojaveIndianTribe
ClarkCounty,Nevada
of Transportation
NevadaDepartment
ThisCommittee
meteighttimesto reviewthedocument
anda publichearingwasheldon October14,199'7.
Tbeupdateis nowcomplete
andADOT is askingtheCity to acceptthenewdocument.
:,scAL[^TPACT:

REI'IEI4,EDB',:

lli,. ,

/l

I ^rA^tcE

Therewill not be any fiscd impactsto the City as a resultofacceptingthe ArizonaUpdateto the Colorado
fuverR onalT
nation Stu
A TT"4CHA|EATTS:
alExecutive
Summary
of theArizonaUpdateto theColoradofuverRegional
Transportation
Study.

().\';
]iL(-( )l r\ a.\'D..i7I

Transporlation
Study.
Motionto accepttheArizonaUpdateto theColoradoRiverRegional

CIT'\' CLERK'S USE OI\LY
cot'NctL Acl loN'TAKEN

APPRO\GD FOR SLTB\IITTAL B\':

CO}TI\IIED
ORDI\A-xCE NO. r

*r"o'.n

t

57,iT4?--

TO

REFERRED TO

Df,i-rED-

A-PLAN-99r009

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EI\TITRONMENTALQUALITY
JohnF. Hagen,Acting Director

GovernorJaneDee Hull

February10, 1999
The HonorableNorm Hicks, MaYor
City Administration Building
1255Marina Boulevard
Bullhead City, Ar'tmm 86442
Area
SUBJECT: BultheadCity ModeratePMtoNonattainment
Dear Mayor Hicks:
The Arizona Deparrrnentof EnvironmentalQuality (ADEQ is ready to submit to the U.S.
EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (EPA) a requestto revoke the nonattainmentstarusfor PMto
for the BullheadCity area. The requestis basedon air quaiity data from 1994-96,which show
the area was in attainmentfor the 24-hr and annual standardsand is consistentwith EPA's
December1997guidanceregardingthe preexistingPM,o national ambientair quaiiry shndalds
(NAAQS). ln additionto havingcieanair, the statemust also demonstratethat eachreasonably
availablecontrol measureGACM) implementedto help the areareachattainmentwill continue
to ensurethereareno futureviolationsof the PMtoNAAQS.
As part of its research,ADEQ has verified with JanicePaul that the specifiedRACMs included
in the enclosediist havebeenimplementedby the City for the nonattahmentarea. We appreciate
of Ms. Paul in this task. It is critical that the RACMs impiementedare maintained.
the assistance
SinceEPA's actionto revokethe PM,o standardsfor the BullheadCity areais dependentupon the
RACMs remainingin place,pleasecall me at (602) zoi -2308if you haveany concernsover the
facr that theseRACIr{s must continueto be implementedby the City.

//

NancyC.

Enclosures(1)
cc:

WryL"4/* ff->
/*.!4-ffl

JanicePaul

3033North Central,Phoenix,Arizona85012,(602)207-2300

Control Measures Developed and Implemented for the Bullhead City
Moderate PM,o Nonattainment Area

developed
andimplemented
by theArizonaDepartment
Measures
of Transportation:
.
or chemicallystabilizeaccess
Pave,vegetate,
pointswhereunpavedtraffllcsurfaces
adjoinpavedroads.
.
Requiredustcontrolplansfor construction
or landclearingprojects.
.
Providefor traffic reroutingor rapidcleanup oftemporarysourcesofdust on paved
roads.
.
Requirecurbingandpaveor stabilizeshoulders
ofpavedroads.
developed
andimplemented
Measures
by MohaveCorurty:
.
Permitrequiredfor excavationandgrading.
.
Prohibit permanentunpavedhaul roadsandparking or stagingareasat commercial,
municipalor industrialfacilities.
.
Requirethepavingor chemicalstabilizationof unpavedroads.
.
Pave,vegetate,or chemicallystabilizeunpavedparkingareas.
.
Providefor stormwaterdrainageto preventwatererosionontopavedroads.
Measures
developed
andimplemented
by Clark County,Nevada:
.
permit
Dust control
requiredfor constructionactivities,including surfacegradingand
trenching.
.
Requirecurbingandpaveor stabilizeshoulders
ofpavedroads.

Measures
developed
andimplemented
by theArizonaDepartment
of Environmental
Quality
(ADEQ:
.
Require
dustcontrolmea$resfor materialstorage
piles.
Measures
developed
andimplemented
by the U.S.ForestService,Bureauofland
Management
andArizonaDeparnnentof StateLands,in cooperation
with ADEe:
.
Prescribed
buming.
J \AQD\}LANNNG\AIJ\BULLR^CNI.h0

Arizona Updateof the CRRTS

i lr

l--,

2ll7 Populationand Dwelling Units

-+.

ffi Bullhead
I ClarkCounty
i
Valley
lill-- Golden
j- I Laughlin

i--

=::

i|

l|

,.___..'

ji - - l
f
,_i,10tr
,'[--*;.-::I',

-l

\-",

i
I Oatman
f - f SanBernadino
Countu

tI
I
Moh_aveVaIIey

TAZ

'
' '1

-',,,,,

tut
: / t'.
,,.,.

: 48:

i

,

'l
' r:oilo '!,,,'

,

/,

:'IilS ,
ll4',, )"
.'-;J;
irn+'*i
l: ',,.
'l
t,s?'
,,ua
,i:,',ituti '11?' l ,'8f*
,,,.,,
u f,,,,.
'
Jt
''',
t,

-r;-,

lt 1

,li,

1,0,1

"'

,"t--{

o

Needles

199
500
233

*

il

MohaveValley
Needles

L]

-"\'

,'0

\..
l:.:.:

Eman

l...

iu' t.t' .

'li,its,o .l/'
$
--*l

iql.ig

=

)"t:t:

DwellingUnits

3olCIli.5...l.':s0....1i'.'
...'.tr
,,',.1,tr-,---"*.-*.,.
,*- . ',--ji, ,,'
f-,

i

l...

Population

I
i
t

'

"'

,.::.
,:,,,,," ' , ...,','itta

.'.l.','.',
'.i..
,,,:,.'".''
.,''",

1**,;,'';;

'

1:

J:
{i:.:.
\i'

October.1997

.il

{

, 1 . ''
/
_ , r 1 , , , t, 't' ', " , , ,l.,1l ,.:0 0
,
.,.,''l I
t.:

: I

1t:T.-;-*-r*-rl :.

itif

0

r91

- ---u'4'--'-i*'*
,rr-;',1,1-,t
9g
3'
_t'r
, _P,J, .-ru''

0 ti!

0l

jiI

'.

| /lI
liii

l_
52
0

53
8960,
3g4t'.

,

. i i i . ! : !

,:.

....rm',...i-?$,i'#.'.|';tll

,!'
/t

',--,.
: .,/'

38
0
0

#r\

I

:::!\
! - -

, ..:

r--:

y*J

:-

\,'*'-_-1*--:*

,,",,::,
';'''.-'+***:

i,''

,.,'l.sr
ls*,","/1 |
- o'i-+l[*---ilJ^,;i,
ill$
i,
'tlftsfo.1,,,:
,. .,,.-*F"
j

;}{

,'i-*'

l

._J

),'

#t

104
446.

{._

:t
::/
,l

:.:'
'
,""--'-i:*-',
' ${$$j'Ttf"j-', ,,,,
"",t'1'di':
1;;ffiq;i'5ffii,,,,',,i,".:i

i iij

:ii/t;

?frS.,l.

'741".t

[tszo{56rl
\,il

l,

s

I

:',.-'

-,-,-[-il'"""'rr'1'

-'L

't,'i','rzti..r.i,r,
'
,,
i;,,,t
, 1 -,
i
i-iss';,
.
^Jiilr.=F'
l,,E|',rrtr,, i - -r
,0- ,r,
i -il160\\.
I

_

..;or",...'....

j + ' ',
\ L, ,J
|

l, -'"''

2913

tgfr

64

49
2l

I84
4501 660 r83

I 2s0

283

rmltT
81li

0
0

67u*

69

7456
3200

I

II

66

ri;

5266
2525

ii

I

L..--*-

'--F

70

::'l
L-'"":'

[il

,.,,

l'i*,

l8s
0\
0

3777
1620

I
I
{
--

jlt*=

-=---

lB',\,77 2oog 75r

lo-,

836

o ill-

I

---*-- -,.

'79 ,,
;-" 80
r32
f

82

t77l

0i

l

*t.-_

I
I

84 83 1187I|
r32 876I

55

54

:\

t\

-._\,

86
ti''.s7-117,

,'t'

'-

l'l

I 808
773

10353
M36

'L

t-_.t-,--;-=

-

''-^-'!r--

| .'
t' l. . ' \ \

'\

.1ir

,t\i

i

i.
l-

1

\
\

\i

\F
. -- ' - ' \

l;_ l

l----

I
1'...

iatu ' ''...,

4oe'' ,'.t.,.,.
rti. .

\

-ii,\,

I

230., , l\

i
..'
"'
,,,,....il
:.

I

I
_. l
I

I
\
l.{
l/

,/'

]

,' ':,,i: ,; :' J, . , f

'

+91;J'-.,,0.i'+F-+:'..
__'i,,,

,iir-

i ,rld:

:r

i : ;,::;:.
....
...,.,.ii.,,:
.'....
,,,,.i
,,
',' '
..,'::,il,$#,,,,.

"';''il

0

I

:::i,:r

'il

-1
1.
:
1l5titt{riffifr
iI.-iJ:
':.'-{r'r;u
l,tmUiltzlil

:)i'';'

nn-.f

'. lt.r-'

.,,''''
'' .*+g,.,..,,

,'t,,',-- *f-+---+; --*+*-1.-'*t

,.,

t.

.,:

:' ,, , t
,'\
" " : ,l {
' : :'\

,:: .:: :

'"'r -

t

';:::,;

: , ':

];,'

t,

I

t.t

\i .'.. .\

Ariz,unatlpdate of the CRRTS
}ffi

rli
I

Employment

-+.

Bullhead
ffi
t-- lClarkCounty
GoldenValley
ffi
t- | Laughlin
MohaveValley
E
Needles
E
ffi

--li

t
I

itt

Bul-lhead

SanBernadino
County

Valley

NV

ii'
\\

i\

500

Employees

Sen

a

tilt
,l
ii

i1

I

\
\

ft4
'2

ffi

,ii,r
,\

,..!

'

\
\1

trt

Ir,rro

I18

i tr?

nn

)
1

I
II

I

\

0

\

Rorn:rli

35

',

'J

L-.

Needl-es

TAZ

l{}7

I

li

t0s

.I

l\

Laughlin

r99

l

/

\---

rG6

(}

i\

Golden

I\.

-l

''i

County,

. /t',.

-.-' lill

i

CIark

34

i--=
t

Mohave Valley

II

i

ts

Oatman

t{t3

I

t16

()clrrbcr. 1997

\
-\,
.'
.,. \\,',

{

j

I

I

'.,I
'

, \ Il0
t,
:

.t

.,n

i

,,'
i

i

I
*-*--.-__J

I

I

.'47
''-F-*

ii-

48

r2l

.:,"

-+
130'i.rsr

0.

rei

/2?

---

i'

i0

t68

t

:

ti

:,::.1

.13 r$4 13:S r3s 137 [

1

3

\34

u 1,48
T"=';'l
I

Il-.r4S
jo
I
J

0

I
L-

)l .lltiil.,.,.l...,+$t

l:

,"'x.li,lp''.r/
'.../ /1t;tTffi
'r,tz\
zn
273Irzl
lz8| nt
lT$\ '
rz7II
r:*ft
II
| rrl rz*

l'

i

J

t.ft
ffi

r4t r4{},r$9
ff

I44
.:
,0

fi

j+S

, ',,;ff.

,:,

r4s 146

,i

I.4?

i,j

r4ff r49 tSrl ls:I,
s,
s
0
s

.:

:

:i:.

.,,,

1-l

IS2;,
,$

l5$,.,
.,0,,

i rfs ttfo
i
-- .11160,\,
o

,l

,;i

/

E
t::,
i,,,

t/.

-,*-,,1

"" ,ftfr I
:,1
,:.:.

1l'

15-9,i I,\

/

;
i,

'4 ,'

s,:.

2

ll.

ii' ,' ,36

"

.,.
t

I

\
I

,/'li- -

* ,-l--.

:
t:

i'I

//

i

.:

tt:

l-1zs,orii---,/#,,,1
. ffi.;....,
.t 60
un;
\\r25\

,$'

0

\?

I

,/'

r^..J
,^\l2s
\

ri.

ts?
vsf
:s

I

tit\

(.3t0
'..
lI

t3t

54Izzi5

\,

,' .,i'.3s$

,r() ''-

t/

.:.,'.:,:':,1:
,::,:::,.i:l::
'trl
.
:r !

55

),"

f
I

:l

I

,.,J
,,:,

"i
.'-l

I

*'7 | I /dl I

ll}ol

I

,

\ i-==fi6f_TT9l

[-gt l

i_-tg--'

\

s \
v

| 1 s6 I t* l--;
L-J64 1184ir*3

\

|

|

oa,

ii

-'

11,

I

l \ 3 7 9 t 1 - _ _\ 3
- -7=9| -1_1+- -_-_. - - _ . t - _ + - - . _

I

I!

s 9 l 81 6- -

1

u

l

t / i - " f f i

lrur ir82
! I

i

i

?t) \ry!'EL
e6e
--

\

+

684

I

1_ - -_-i-::-r

lzr itz

66
4er

I

I

"
'i
1-

fi

\',

I

g0
0

1s 174 i
/lu 1 78
7501781
750

,fi#

I- JI

rr ll;1
I82

i8r

i

:!

o L-- i

l23ol
lrrut

*.,s Gn[il
n*
rr7I___i
1,,j|
1 1*, i rrz

lrir3irr+ I,u
! i\\t,
-a1
1
\
.,i- tr*ri:---i_ I
l--r----t-l
*7 x5 i g6. i
"',- . t+*I
*':
85
:i
j

,.'---*i. 235 i

,tf

,

-t']

1346

L.__:-t '

, ,:-1
. . . , i.\
\':::
"
1:: :
:' \
\
1
:\. , ,1
i
:\
1
,

,

;r;;t;:ii

i\

|l--'
1.lfrl

(ii

",.j,

'
\

,',\
'\

_-_?i-----. -'---r-- ---f

::::i\

/$.
itl

i.--I

L

I

1
l

/1. r, r
,.1
\\\.\
, jI
i'
''

I

.

lE--

t+

,''

r ..,\ ' \ . .,f'
51,

; ' ,,

I'
. ' j '/'...-

i
I

1

T
97

/'
/
I
i

+

,
I
I

...

/,r'-

I

I

.-!'

t2

l_